Slashdot Mirror


Nielsen Will Measure TV ratings Among DVR Users

prostoalex writes "TV ratings publisher Nielsen is one company that got affected by the digital video recorder boom. With 7 million households recording TV shows and watching them on their own schedules, the concept of primetime changes, and the audience reporting is becoming skewed. So now Nielsen is launching a special program for DVR households, which would allow advertisers and TV executives to track the popularity of TV programs. Nielsen plans to distribute paper diaries among the households that use digital video recorder. Last time I did a Nielsen TV rating diary, they paid $5 a week."

133 comments

  1. Torrents? by Laivincolmo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder if they'll ever start surveying torrent downloaders of tv shows... :)

    1. Re:Torrents? by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wonder if they'll ever start surveying torrent downloaders of tv shows... :)

      You misspelled subpoenaing.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Torrents? by Moofius.the.Cow · · Score: 1, Informative

      This wouldn't be terribly hard to do on an automatic basis, as long as you had access to a good directory of torrents.

      Just connect to each of the trackers in question, note which IPs have completed downloads of the shows you're interested in, and correlate this with your records of other trackers*.

      * Mass lawsuit against your fans optional.

    3. Re:Torrents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually www.tvtorrents.net already has those stats - look in the 'completes' column.

    4. Re:Torrents? by cosmic_0x526179 · · Score: 1

      Remember one thing... NMR could not care less what you download... they care what you watch. Which is also the point of the DVR stuff (unchanged from the days when I worked there oh so many years ago) is the same as with VCR playback. They care what you actually have your eyeballs on, not what you recorded (or downloaded in this case).

      --
      This msg is brought to you by the letter 'W'.. for Worthless Wuss
    5. Re:Torrents? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I downloaded all the episodes of Alias seasons 1, 2 and 3. I plan to do so for 4 when it comes out as well. Why? Because some kind person makes HDTV versions available -- which are higher quality than the DVDs I bought of the same, and I don't own an HDTV TV; I watch them on my computer.

      Yes, I bought the DVDs -- why? Because I want to give them a few bucks toward the next season. Vote with your wallet.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    6. Re:Torrents? by severoon · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think this is a great idea. It's just a shame that they have to use paper and pencil, because I understand that's a notoriously bad way to collect data. If only they had a computer-like device connected to the TV that received every remote click so they could know exactly what's going on...

      Oh well, I guess that's a pretty ridiculous idea, huh?

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    7. Re:Torrents? by creep · · Score: 1

      Are you sure they're higher quality, even after compression to DivX/XviD?

    8. Re:Torrents? by CajunElder · · Score: 1

      Actually, they do have such devices. I'm a Nielson family right now for overnight ratings. When Nielson came out there were about 12 techs that came out and put boxes on every TV, VCR, DVD player, video game console in the house (had to open all the cases and tap into the tuner chips). They ran cable to a central modem, and every night (around 2 or 3 am) it calls into the central office and reports what we watched during the previous day.

      --
      A treat to eat, in a puppet that's neat!
    9. Re:Torrents? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Go download them yourself.

      Don't forget that DVDs are MPEG-2 compressed as well; they're not "perfect" either.

      According to mplayer, the HDTV versions I have are:

      VIDEO: [XVID] 624x352 24bpp 23.976 fps 951.5 kbps (116.1 kbyte/s)

      AUDIO: 48000 Hz, 2 ch, 16 bit (0x10), ratio: 14000->192000 (112.0 kbit)

      Personally, they look amazing -- and I'm picky about video compression artifacts.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    10. Re:Torrents? by severoon · · Score: 1

      You're a Nielson family?

      Cool. Keep an eye posted on this thread--I'll get back to you with all the shows you should watch and not watch.

      Heh. I bet you get that all the time, huh?

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
    11. Re:Torrents? by CajunElder · · Score: 1

      Well... it's SUPOSSED to be a secret. I'm trusting that everyone on Slashdot will keep that secret. We're also supposed to just watch television "normally" without thinking of our effects on the ratings. I have to confess that I tape shows that are reruns of shows I like to give them a ratings boost even though I don't watch what I tape (the show still gets credit). I also fiercely avoid shows that I wish would die even if there is a 5 minute segment that I would normally watch.

      --
      A treat to eat, in a puppet that's neat!
  2. Already signed up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My DirecTiVo asked me awhile ago if I wanted to participate. I don't mind sharing data on what TV I watch, and if it will report it automatically to help the shows I do enjoy be renewed and stay on the air, I think it's great. I've also done a radio diary once, it was a pain to keep track of. This will make the process a lot easier.

    1. Re:Already signed up. by MBCook · · Score: 2, Interesting
      So did I. No only do I not mind people tracking what I'm watching, I WANT them to to monitor it. Anything I can to do to try to show how little I like much of the innane and stupid TV that's on these days (and to help them realize some of those little gems that I don't want to ever dissapear).

      That said, they said that they would call me if I was in (IIRC) and I've yet to be called.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Already signed up. by xanderwilson · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even without that agreement, Tivo keeps track of what people watch, but says they do it entirely anonymously. Which is why they got to know the "most replayed' moment during the Superbowl half time. I'm surprised Neilson doesn't just pay for that data directly from Tivo. They did that, and I'd even Tivo the Whedon episodes I have on DVD.

      Alex.

    3. Re:Already signed up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, to join the program, didn't you have to sign some sort of agreement about not divulging your participation in said endeavour?

    4. Re:Already signed up. by Class+Act+Dynamo · · Score: 1

      I found the radio diary quite easy. My car radio got stolen so when I got the radio diary, I just filled out "Did not listen" for seven days and sent it back when they asked. Easiest six bucks ever.

      --
      My other computer is a Jacquard loom.
    5. Re:Already signed up. by MBCook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They probably want much more specific data that the anonomized and agregated data TiVo collects. My guess is that most of the TiVo data is just "person X has 31 season passes and 12 hours on their thing and watches an average of 4 hours per day". I wouldn't be suprised if info like the Superbowl thing is only because they tracked that specific show. I'm not sure how valuable that kind of info would be on most shows.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    6. Re:Already signed up. by healy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can not confirm or deny any such agreement that I did or did not sign to join or not join such an endeavor.

      --
      "Jesus saves sinners...and redeems them for valuable coupons"
    7. Re:Already signed up. by whmac33 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just did a Nielsen survey.

      They tracked a lot more than what was tuned to on the TV. They had columns for each person in the house and when they were watching and how old and what sex each person is. They even wanted to know what the tv was on when we weren't watching.

      Nielsen isn't just total market share. It's demographics and stuff... Tivo can't automatically monitor that stuff.... I don't think.

      Also it had a section for what shows I used the myth box to record when I was watching live tv.

    8. Re:Already signed up. by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure how valuable that kind of info would be on most shows.

      I would say very . It would tell them which commercials are good enough in fast-forward (or "only see an instant then rewind and play it" like my ReplayTV, and the TiVo can be programmed to have a 30-second skip as well but it seems to keep "turning off" the setting so we have to keep programming it...), and which commercials are ignored.

      I tend to watch most of the ads for other shows, which tend to appear at the end of the commercial block. Many of those shows I watch, and I'm interested in learning what shows are new as well. The first commercial in the block is usually a movie, so I tend to watch those, again to stay informed.

      It's funny, people at work will ask me, "Have you seen that commercial where" etc., and I have to say, "Sorry, I don't watch most commercials, I have a ReplayTV."

      But as far as the information's value, advertisers would pay good money to know what's effective in this new medium.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    9. Re:Already signed up. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Now that it requires so little effort to give them the data, perhaps more people will do as you are and give it for the sake of improving the content.

      But five dollars a week? If you're telling me that up until now most of the data has been generated by people who were willing to fill out a load of forms for five dollars a week, then I think we may have discovered why US tv is so dreadful. Its been skewed towards the tastes of the five dollars a week people.

      When I lived in the States, there were two things I couldn't believe (or stand). The first was the random and sudden interruption by adverts. Here in the UK, if you get adverts (i.e. you're not watching BBC), then you get a fixed interval at a fixed time that appears after a closing screen / music to provide a less jarring break. And the second was the standard news broadcasts which had hardly any international content at all.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    10. Re:Already signed up. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We were picked as a Nielson family for our TiVo DVRs. They called us to get the household demographic information to see who used which TiVo. Also, your TiVo log records much more than just your season passes. It actually captures each button press on the TiVo remote, so they can tell when you are actually watching, vs, recording, and which portions of the program you fast forward through.

      Furthermore, it knows which things are recorded, but never watched, so the Nielsen data is actually pretty accurate.

      Now I hope that since my household is picked and we don't watch ANY reality TV, that maybe the execs will realize that not all americans live in a trailer and want to watch reality TV crap.

      (One can only dream)

      Long live TiVo!!! (Now if they would just enforce their patents against all other DVR providers, they might just be able to stay in business.....)

  3. One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by 0WaitState · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nielsen cheerfully tells you what shows are watched, but won't tell you whether the audience kept the commercials on, or whether they muted them, skipped forward, or changed channels for 3 minutes.

    Actually reporting what commercials are viewed to completion with sound-on would radically change televsion programming and advertising.

    --

    Remain calm! All is well!
    1. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure this is/can be taken into account, however. How users respond to commercial breaks could be determined in an experiment, and then statistically applied to the Nielsen data.

    2. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by banuk · · Score: 1

      I thought one of the plusses of DVRs was the ability to skip commercials, what use would this be at the Television Bureau of Advertising's annual research symposium. If I had a DVR I'd skip all the commercials and get my daily dose of advertising through /. banners and such

    3. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2, Informative
      Nielsen cheerfully tells you what shows are watched, but won't tell you whether the audience kept the commercials on, or whether they muted them, skipped forward, or changed channels for 3 minutes.

      Actually reporting what commercials are viewed to completion with sound-on would radically change televsion programming and advertising.

      FWIW, Tivos have the ability to do all of this, assuming of course that the owner of the Tivo uses the stock remote instead of a universal remote, and most Tivo owners do use the stock remote.

      The tivo remote also has the ability to control your TV and your sound system, and when e.g. you press the mute button, adjust the volume, or turn off the tv, the remote simultaneously sends another IR signal to the tivo telling the tivo what button was pressed, and the tivo logs it and reports it to the company every night. It also logs when you fast forward, rewind, instant replay, etc. It also logs what recordings you have watched throughout the day, how long you've watched them for, how many times you've watched them, etc.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    4. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why would they track something like this in the remote and not just the unit itself? i think you're making things up or supposing things.

    5. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by mdfst13 · · Score: 1

      "why would they track something like this in the remote and not just the unit itself?"

      Perhaps because you mute the *TV*, not the DVR?

    6. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by Peyna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two words: Product Placement.

      --
      What?
    7. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah... for each ad seperately if you want meaningful data. I remember to press mute when an annoying ad comes up.

    8. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by Saeger · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Two more words: "Video Overlay"

      If product placement gets bad enough, you can bet your ass that the DVR's worth having will also have the ability to download dynamic edit files off the net that can overlay/blur/cut-out the annoying branding. It's not THAT hard to do, and only one person or "release group" has to do it in order to make it available to millions.

      Suddenly all the annoying "FedEx" boxes in Castaway, for example, become barely noticable "Acme" refs, saving you from being mentally engineered like consumer cattle.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    9. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by ForestGrump · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't hide the face that Voigt is superior than Wilson.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    10. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by westlake · · Score: 1
      reporting what commercials are viewed to completion with sound-on would radically change televsion programming and advertising

      Meaning, more product placement and advertising tightly integrated into program content.

      It would be a return to the formula developed for radio broadcasting in the thirties and forties, and television in the fifties, with the advertising agencies firmly in control of what could be broadcast.

      The system worked well when it supported quality programing of the sort that only PBS and subscription services like HBO provide now. (Texaco's 75 year sponsorship of the Metropolitan Opera comes first to mind.) But the agencies rarely took chances and usually folded quick;y under pressure.

      They would not have fought for the uncensored broadcast of "Saving Private Ryan."

    11. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by Christopheles · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't see how that changes much, after you change it, it's still promoting Acme, and I don't support their exploitation of third-world sweat-shop workers to construct sticks of dynamite and bizarre Rube-Goldburg like devices that frequently fail and are indeed quite dangerous to their operators.

      BOYCOTT ACME!

    12. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dont know about this. Bladerunner wouldnt be the same without the cocacola and Atari signs. A lot of movies would make no sense without the ads.

    13. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1
      why would they track something like this in the remote and not just the unit itself?

      Read what I posted. If you press the mute button on the remote for example, it sends two simultaneous infrared signals: One telling the DVR that the mute button was pressed, thus it logs it, and another one giving the mute command to the TV.

      i think you're making things up or supposing things.

      I have been hacking tivos for almost three years now. My reputation in the tivo hacking scene should speak for itself. After a while one tends to notice these things, especially while probing the tivos log files and probing the MFS structure.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    14. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by bastard42 · · Score: 1

      only one person or "release group" has to do it in order to make it available to millions.

      Yep, I totally depend on other people from keeping me "mentally engineered like consumer cattle".

      Or did you mean that no one noticed "Acme". I always use Acme. It saved the Road Runner because it required a clueful user. Every once and a while it saves me too.


      RIP ODB. The Wu-Tang Clan ain't nothing't to fuck with.

    15. Re:One thing they carefully will NOT measure... by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I think that product placement in Bladerunner was done artfully and tastefully without the least bit distraction to the movie.

      However, times are changing. Some product placements are so glaring that I pause to myself and think "hey, wait, they are trying to sell me something here." I'm quite sure that the line will be crossed increasingly more.

      For a telling perspective on this see the Frontline show The Persuaders.

      Extremely revealing, I came away with a sense of hopelessness about where we are headed.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  4. Whew... by Moofius.the.Cow · · Score: 1

    Good thing it's just paper...

    I can just lie about my pr0^H^H^H Trek watching.

    1. Re:Whew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, you have it backwards. You're supposed to ^H the MORE pathetic one.

    2. Re:Whew... by Moofius.the.Cow · · Score: 0

      Oops! Fuck!

  5. Consider it community service by Alcimedes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please, if you have a chance to sign up for these services, do so. And watch decent television. The sooner we can get the Reality TV craze off the air the better.

    1. Re:Consider it community service by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      The sooner we can get the Reality TV craze off the air the better.

      I have DirecTV and a DVR. Hundreds of channels, all time-shifted. Watch what I want when I want. History, Discovery, Sci-Fi, Bravo, Trio, A&E, TechTV, Cartoon, Boomerang, VH1 A, B, C, & D, seventeen PBS nets, and Alison Mack in Smallville new once a week and seven more old in syndication. All the producers of Reality TV shows would have to band together, dress up like Carmen Miranda, and set off an M-80 in my living room before I was even aware of what channel they were on, let alone feel constrained to watch any of their stuff. Don't you have the same selections I do, or is Mark Burnett holding your dog hostage?

      (Now, Reality TV sucks big time because the producers don't pay proper Guild fees to the writers (in part because they don't want to formally acknowledge the shows _have_ writers, in part because they're cheap SOB's...), but that's a whole 'nother thread....)

    2. Re:Consider it community service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the ultimate reality show: 16 participants from all walks of life (13 white + 2 token african-americans + 1 token east-asian) spend 15 weeks sharing a single television set. Every night they must decide which shows to watch and at the end of each week one participant is voted off. Who will remain as the ultimate couch potato, and what shows will it watch?

    3. Re:Consider it community service by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      You are lucky, I no longer enough tv to be frightned by the possibilty some tv exec might spot that and use it. Else I might be tempted to say somthing REALLY bad about you.
      Perhaps you talk to your doctor about adjusting dosage?

      Mycroft
      (all in good fun, no offence intended(it is a scary idea though))

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  6. I always thought it was funny..... by thewldisntenuff · · Score: 3, Funny

    That they sent me the books with like $20 already inside.....

    I never did complete them, but I always hoped they'd send more...:)

    -thewldisntenuff

    1. Re:I always thought it was funny..... by KUHurdler · · Score: 1

      Yes, we told them on the phone we didn't want to fill out their survey/journal. For some reason, they went ahead and sent us the survey and $5 cash.

      Halfway through the week they called to check on how the journal was going. We told them we still didn't want to fill it out, and thanked them for the cash.

      I always wondered whether it was a mistake, or they just try to guilt people into filling it out by sending them money.

      --
      Fix Your Own TV - RiddledTV.com Avoid the Landfill
  7. That explains a lot by AllenChristopher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Reality television and the rest of the dreck suddenly makes a lot more sense if we're surveying people who are willing to spend the time writing down everything they watch for $5 a week.

    I thought they used special boxes... I guess that only worked when the television landscape was more uniform.

    1. Re:That explains a lot by ke4roh · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did a paper diary at Nielson's request some years ago - perhaps in 2000 - and they paid a whopping $1 for the data. We wrote down what shows we actually watched, those that were on but nobody was particularly watching, and the shows we liked that we didn't get a chance to watch. We also noted which shows we recorded (by VCR at the time) for later viewing. We didn't expend effort watch everything we like, we just did our usual stuff.

      I imagine they have different tiers - people paid $1 are differently motivated than people paid $5. Likewise, people with a set-top box (or a DVR) report different informaiton than those who write it all down. (TiVo switches back to playing live TV after a little while - whether the TV is on or not, nevermind if someone is in the room or not.)

      --
      I hate call waitin`~+~~~
      NO CARRIER
  8. Maybe some good shows will be saved by sdo1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had regularly TiVo'd the live-action version of "The Tick". When it was canceled, I remembered reading news articles about the time it was on and how that killed it in the ratings. And I, a TiVo user, had absolutely NO CLUE when it was actually broadcast. None. All I knew was sometime during the week a new episode showed up on the Now Playing list, so when I had a bit of spare time, I watched it.

    It's good that they're taking this step. Maybe some otherwise decent shows will show higher ratings now.

    -S

    --
    --- What parts of "shall make no law", "shall not be infringed", and "shall not be violated" don't you understand?
    1. Re:Maybe some good shows will be saved by Guiness17 · · Score: 1

      I was like that with Anime Unleashed. ('cept it was DTV and Ultimate TV).

      One sleepless night I was surfing at 3am, and saw it. I remember thinking 'this is when this it's on? Wow, does anybody actually see it?'

      --
      Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
    2. Re:Maybe some good shows will be saved by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      Also, the presidential updates on the war on terror and 9/11 didn't help The Tick much.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    3. Re:Maybe some good shows will be saved by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      So wait, you want more good shows, or more shows like teh live-action Tick? Now, the cartoon "The Tick" was amusing, but the live action version?

  9. "and watch decent television" by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

    Yeah, Europe and Canada are nice ... :)

    --

    The Raven

  10. Their Data will be Mythical - or will it? by icebike · · Score: 4, Informative

    Of course they are only likely to get information from people they can easily find, such as Tivo Customers and Sat TV companies who supply boxes with recording cabpabilities.

    They will totally miss those using Mythtv ( http://www.mythtv.org/ ) or Freevo ( http://freevo.sourceforge.net/ ) or any other home brew solution.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    1. Re:Their Data will be Mythical - or will it? by mojotooth · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes they will. But let's be fair... you have to walk before you can run.

      --
      -- Mojo Tooth : exploring our world as only an idiot can.
    2. Re:Their Data will be Mythical - or will it? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Write a plugin to send viewing/recording information anonymously to secure servers. Publish the stats information somewhere. Charge neilson for the data to pay for your plugin writing time.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    3. Re:Their Data will be Mythical - or will it? by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      Look up -- really high up, like higher than a skyscraper... that's the error margin that homebrew solutions all fall under.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
  11. No paper diary required for DirecTiVo by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 4, Informative

    Nielsen plans to distribute paper diaries among the households that use digital video recorder.

    I got a call from the Nielsen survey guy this morning (who in hell calls at 9:07 on a Saturday morning?) asking if we wanted to take part in the DVR survey. He specifically told me that with the DirecTivo, other than signing the permission for them to monitor the shows I watched/recorded, we wouldn't have to do anything.

    With luck, this will result in better data than last time. Last year we were asked to fill out a paper diary, but my wife was hogging the television all week watching the baseball playoffs, so that skewed the results.

    1. Re:No paper diary required for DirecTiVo by icebike · · Score: 1

      other than signing the permission for them to monitor the shows I watched/recorded,

      Its bad enough they can detect what you record, but inexcusable that they can tell what you actually watched.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:No paper diary required for DirecTiVo by mjh · · Score: 4, Funny
      but my wife was hogging the television all week watching the baseball playoffs

      My question stated in complete awe:

      You have a wife who likes sports?
      Normal slashdotter question:
      You have a wife?
      --
      Key to financial independence: Spend less than you earn. Save and invest the difference. Do it for a long time.
    3. Re:No paper diary required for DirecTiVo by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh suck it, you paranoid douche. If I didn't want them to know what I watched, I'd make the TiVo to stop sending my data. It's not like I'm typing my most perverse masturbation fantasies into the wish list, hoping that something cool will appear.

      I *want* them to know what I watched. I want them to know that I never watch Fear Factor, Good Morning America, Regis and whoever-the-fuck, reality shows, or any show with "Law and Order" or "CSI" in the title. I want them to know that when American Idol is on, I'm not watching or recording it. I want them to know that I don't give a rat's ass about Leno *or* Conan. I want them to get into their thick heads that western movies gobble donkey balls and my wife and I would rather rather watch hideous jewelry wobble around on a turntable on the Gemstone Shopping Network while we shout "eeeew!" than watch John Wayne swagger around.

      I want them to know that I never watch television news unless something's blowing up the fuck up right now, in which case I'll watch CNN. I want them to know that my wife thinks Iron Chef is better than Emeril, movies with Cary Grant are better than movies with John Wayne, and Wanda Sykes does great standup, but she sucks in any other format.

      I want them to scan my wish list and get those movies on the air. Right now. I want them to know that I still have a season pass set for Jonathan Creek, because it was a goddamned good program and I hope they bring it back. The same goes for Family Guy. (Yes, they're bringing it back, but knowing Fox, they'll again put it in the redheaded-stepchild time slot on Sundays, the one that starts when the football game still has two minutes of game time (translation: 1 hour of real time), no one will watch, and they'll kill it again.)

      So you can go suck it, TinfoilBoy. I want my opinion heard.

    4. Re:No paper diary required for DirecTiVo by wilhelmgoetz · · Score: 1

      Regular TiVo keeps track of all you watch and record, leading them to distribute great statistics like:

      'The baring of one of [Janet] Jackson's breasts at the end of her duet with Justin Timberlake, which caused a flood of outraged phone calls to CBS, was replayed a record number of times by TiVo users, a company representative said Monday.'

      From http://news.com.com/2100-1041_3-5152141.html?part= rss&tag=feed&subj=news

    5. Re:No paper diary required for DirecTiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question stated in complete awe:

      You have a wife who likes sports?


      Where'd you get "sports" from? He said "baseball".

    6. Re:No paper diary required for DirecTiVo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my wife and I would rather rather watch hideous jewelry wobble around on a turntable on the Gemstone Shopping Network while we shout "eeeew!" than watch John Wayne swagger around.

      Dude, give this a try: stop watching teevee so much.

    7. Re:No paper diary required for DirecTiVo by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      opinions=friend. :)

    8. Re:No paper diary required for DirecTiVo by mr_zorg · · Score: 1

      You too? He called me at 9:30. Nice guy. I didn't ask about a paper diary, I just kind of assumed it would be digital. Maybe the papaer diaries are for crappy DVRs that can't handle the custom software Nielsen worked out with TiVo some time ago. FYI, he told me that they still don't have a strategy in place on what to track, so for the first three years they would be collecting ONLY general usage habits, not specific shows. How many shows did you watch live? Did you pause them? How many recorded shows did you watch? Did you use Season Passes or Wish Lists? That kind of thing. (Those he mentioned specifically.) Kind of a bummer. But good that they want to get a feel for the market before trying to measure something they don't understand.

  12. Effect of broadcast flag deployment? by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a veteran time-shifter, I can only hope (but not hold my breath) that this service might convince broadcasters not to set aggressive limits on shifted viewing of "prime-time" shows. Once the media moguls understand that many viewers don't live life in 30-minute slots, they may be less likely to prevent time-shifting. On the other hand, I tend to time shift by weeks or months and I could see broadcasters setting the system to limit viewing to when 99% of viewers are watching with recording expiry times of only a few days.

    Perhaps its time to stockup on pre-broadcast flag equipment.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Effect of broadcast flag deployment? by Secrity · · Score: 1

      I have noticed that some network prime time shows are now being rebroadcast in the wee hours of the morning. This is a Very Good Thing for timeshifters.

  13. What's the point of a diary in this case? by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I don't understand. Why ask people to keep a diary? Isn't the whole idea of a DVR that your viewing habits are being digitally tracked automatically? A diary is weak since it depends on people keeping up with it, filling it out accurately, and so on. So why use that here? Just get the cable companies to release the data that they must be collecting in the aggregate (if not in the specific, for all I know).

    Or are there rules against doing that with digital subscribers? I've assumed from the moment I got a DVR from Time Warner that if they wanted to they could track my viewing habits on a second-by-second basis, which beats the pants off any diary method.

    And yes, Time Warner has by now caught on to how I like old movies and Star Trek...

    1. Re:What's the point of a diary in this case? by beaststwo · · Score: 2, Informative
      I have a ReplayTV box and it definitely sends stuff back to mommy. Since I started having it dial to a Linux box in my house to use my DSL connection, I started capturing all network traffic to and from it when it connects at night. In a typical night, it gets about 150KB of info and sends about 100KB.

      The only things that Neilsen can't get like this in knowledge of who in the family is watching and where they fit in the demographic. So a 40-year old like me might gets ads for Britney or Polygrip, when I really want to see "Bob the Enzyte guy".

      Also, my bet would be that ReplayTV and Tivo would want more green than the lousy $5 they pay to the public.

    2. Re:What's the point of a diary in this case? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      as i sit in a time warner building at a time warner PC I can tell you that your DVR recordings are done locally and are thus not being logged.

      now Icontrol or On demand... that is a different story as it is streamed from a server, so we have server like stats for it. Just like you might on a webserver.

    3. Re:What's the point of a diary in this case? by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      I don't understand. Why ask people to keep a diary? Isn't the whole idea of a DVR that your viewing habits are being digitally tracked automatically? A diary is weak since it depends on people keeping up with it, filling it out accurately, and so on. So why use that here? Just get the cable companies to release the data that they must be collecting in the aggregate (if not in the specific, for all I know).

      Near as I'm aware, a Nielson household is more than just some Joe/Jane with a TV. They are trying to gain demographic data on who watches what. Raw data of when something watched isn't enough. They want to know if it's Little Billy, Sally, Ma or Pops.

      I did participate in something similar once. I can't remember what they called it, but it was some form of television show preview where they send you out "tickets" to catch a couple of upcoming pilot shows. Basically you sat down in some hotel conference room and watched some gawd awful turnkey sit-coms with commercials. Imagine all the worst aspects of Threes Company, Dharma and Greg, Friends, and Mad About You all rolled into one. The data they wanted to collect was more than whether you liked the show or not, but whether you remember what was being advertised between commercials. Needless to say they wanted all sorts of subjective data that couldn't just be collected by machine.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  14. Unfortunately... by jangobongo · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can't just "sign up" to be a Neilson "family". They have to contact you. They study demographics and then invite only certain qualifying households to participate.

    The nice thing is, though, if you have any problems with your TVs or cable (etc) service, they will send someone over to repair or fix the problem. Anything to keep you watching... We got free service on our TVs that way.

    A negative is that you start to become a slave to your TV, because you're "voting" for your favorite shows. Gotta stay home and watch, you know. I always wondered how many Neilson "families" would turn on the TV to certain shows/channels, even when no one was physically there in ffront of the TV to watch.

    --

    Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    1. Re:Unfortunately... by Ibanez · · Score: 1
      You can't just "sign up" to be a Neilson "family". They have to contact you. They study demographics and then invite only certain qualifying households to participate.


      Hence the reason he said if you have a CHANCE to, then sign up for it.

      Not everyone sign up for it.
    2. Re:Unfortunately... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my girlfriend was a neilson tv slave ... until i built her a device that shakes her little "device" for her ...
      needless to say the tv was on techtv for 3 months LOL with no one actually watching

      the devices they use seem to be uhf recorders housed in old motorola pager cases with a mic and from what i could tell 256MB of some kind of flash memory with a base station that reports back via RF and phoneline

      interesting pieces of kit but i havent signed any NDA's so i can share my findings LOL
      are your tinfoil hats tight enough neilson?

  15. Commentary from a nielson member by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I am obligated to post this as AC, because the guidelines for Nielson households forbid me from advertising my involvement with them.

    My family has been participating in the Nielson rating system for 4 years now, and for as long as we've had it in our house, it records what channel our video recording units are tuned to when they are recording _as well as_ the tuner on the television itself.

    So I'm not sure how this is anything new, exactly

    1. Re:Commentary from a nielson member by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      I know my tivo records a lot of junk. Part of that comes from a household of people with different tastes, and also its poor suggestions (I like futurama, a cartoon, so therefore I should like Lizzie McGuire). I delete lots of it without watching. I'd think that would skew the results. Also, there are some shows it'll record because someone paid them to make sure it was available to me... that would skew the results majorly.

    2. Re:Commentary from a nielson member by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, we just use good old fashioned programmable VCR's... and nobody's hacking them anytime soon.

      I won't get a Tivo, for exactly the reasons you describe.

    3. Re:Commentary from a nielson member by AvantLegion · · Score: 1
      You know that you can turn off the retarded "auto-record suggested programs" feature, don't you?

    4. Re:Commentary from a nielson member by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give Lizzie McGuire a thumbs down before you delete it. The suggestions get better if you tell it what shows you don't like too.

  16. They will totally miss those using Mythtv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Both of them
    (only kidding!)

    1. Re:They will totally miss those using Mythtv by mrgreen4242 · · Score: 1

      While I know you are kidding, the number of people actually using these systems is likely small enough that, statistally speaking, they would only need to include 2 or 3 into the sample group to be representitive. Couple that with the fact that the deviation of shows watched between a geeky TiVo user (me) and a MythTV user is probably next to nil, so their ommision is larglely irrelivent.

  17. Direct Tivo by bschmitt · · Score: 1

    I have the Direct Tivo unit. It has absolutely changed the way my family watches tv. A few weeks ago we were offered to submit to be one the families for this. If you have Direct Tivo you may have the option at the main menu to join in also.

  18. time warner? by evilmousse · · Score: 3, Insightful


    I always wondered what time warners' cable boxes were capable of sending back to TW. Does anyone know if they do any accounting of what's watched?

    I don't see why TW would have to limit itself to DVR either, surely all digital boxes are capable.

    Go ahead, sell accounting of my viewing habits--it's one of the few circumstances I welcome it. TW Prices here in WI are just beyond rediculous, it would be nice to get back to being just short of it. =P

  19. GOOD! by Cirrius · · Score: 1

    Maybe the next Firefly equivalent won't get cancelled mid-season.

  20. Who needs ratings? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They should immediately cancel the few solidly-written, well-produced, well-acted shows currently on the air, continue producing thousands more hours of video dreck, those vacuous "series" that are as indistinguishable from each other as they are from white noise, and save themselves the worry about "ratings". It's what they really want to do anyways: TV executives seem continually surprised when people actually watch a quality production. It was predicted that Star Trek: The Next Generation would be too "highbrow" for the American audience and would fail miserably (this from some of the folks at Paramount, no less.) I mean, good heavens, a Shakespearean actor in the lead role? That it became a true hit series just blew them away, and that it was a hit among people of all walks of life, not just technojocks, nerds, and old-line Trekkies like me was especially shocking to them.

    I mean ... what was the whole point of denaturing the education system in this country to the point where college graduates can't write in full sentences if not to produce a generation of mindless boobs incapable of appreciating a good literary reference or understand humor any less subtle than a Mack truck. Apparently that effort has failed because we do still appreciate a good show with high production values, on those rare occasions when we see one.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    1. Re:Who needs ratings? by payndz · · Score: 1
      It was predicted that Star Trek: The Next Generation would be too "highbrow" for the American audience and would fail miserably (this from some of the folks at Paramount, no less.)

      Well, Paramount's certainly got no worries about Star Trek being 'highbrow' these days...

      --
      You must think in Russian.
    2. Re:Who needs ratings? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no kidding. I've been a Trek fan since the original series on but, honestly, after The Next Generation finished its run they should have just left it at that. Between Voyager, DS9 and Enterprise, it's hard to pay attention any more. I mean I watched Voyager largely because of Jeri Ryan's front-side bus, I watched DS-9 because of Terry Farrell (pretty much the same reason) and Enterprise ... well I really don't watch Enterprise. Maybe if they accidentally opened a a temporal rift and sucked Seven-of-Nine back a couple hundred years to become a new regular on the show I'd watch it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  21. The real reason TV programming sucks by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    Last time I did a Nielsen TV rating diary, they paid $5 a week.

    I think we now know why TV caters to the lowest common denominator - $5/wk to give up my privacy and maybe manually fill out paper records of what I watch? Only people with nothing better to do are going to participate.

    Just think, if someone were to hack the Nielson system, and instead of doing it to be a 1337 B1FF, no bragging rights, just subtle social engineering, we could get some good shows that last.

    No more cancelation of a good show because the network can't schedule it well, no more reality show spam. Heck, we could get more pr0n on the air - the next Janet to whip out a tit will get crazy good numbers - fuck the FCC!

    Hacking Nielson is better than being president, its like being the the guy who pulls the prez's strings, but without having to worry about a heart attack.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:The real reason TV programming sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we now know why TV caters to the lowest common denominator - $5/wk to give up my privacy and maybe manually fill out paper records of what I watch? Only people with nothing better to do are going to participate.

      That is TV's target market, people with nothing better to do. If you had something better to do, you wouldn't be watching TV would you?

    2. Re:The real reason TV programming sucks by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      There was a movie (comedy of course) along those lines a while back, some guy (played by Danny Divito IIRC) who was hack tv writer or producer or some such managed to get a list of the names and adress of all the neilson households and send them tickets for a 'cruise' they had won. Of course the 'cruise' was a sham and the boat took the neilson families all over the place except home while this guy hired people to stay in the neilson houses and keep the tv tuned only to shows he was responsible for.
      Had cartoons about successfull mobsters using such phrases 'get yer rocks off' on saturday morning and so on. Quite funny, though a bit overboard in some places. Been a while though so I can't remember the name of movie.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  22. Paper diaries? Reminds me of my boss by EvanKai · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ME: Boss, I'm slammed and I don't have time for any additional projects.

    BOSS: Ok. Why don't you start writing down everything you're doing.

    ME: And how is that going to save me any time?

    People by DVRs because they want to save time. I doubt many will give that up for $5 after paying $200-500 to get it.

  23. Pretty stupid experience by thoughtlover · · Score: 3, Informative

    We recently got rid of the Niesen 'box' in the house I live in. We had four roommates when we started and they didn't really participate. We also know that we are in the two most difficult groups to market to (young women and 25-35 year-old men - yeah, you read that right!) - yet, Nielsen didn't really pay much attention us. I remember a friend who was also doing the survey and he said that they would call his house if they weren't sticking to pressing the 'confirm button' on what looked like antiquated gear (circa 1970's) - the box wold start flashing all of it's lights in a crazed pattern if the person who changed the TV channel didn't also confirm the change with the Nielsen remote. One day, the Nielsen rep came to their door with $50 asking them nicely to be more diligent participants. He did that every month for about three months since they kept it up. At the beginning, they gave us $200 and paid for the monthly land-line phone fee (for their equipment to talk to the local server.)

    All of the experience made me curious. I wondered why it took them so long to switch to something more hi-tech. Cable boxes have been out since the 70's. I remember watching Jaws on HBO when I was a kid. We could have easily been a Nielsen house then if they got wise earlier. We didn't give them any useful information in the hopes they would come back to us and say 'it's so important for our statistic pool, here's another $200.'

    They never did. We did get Dish with a DVR so that was a great reason to ditch the 'UFO' that roosted on our TV.

    One thing they did do was break our VCR when they opened it up to install their sensing equipment. They replaced it with a new one, and then, when they packed up, they gave us a new one in the box because the technician needed to install it at a new house. I think it was refurbished because there was a sticker on the plastic inside that said 'Do Not Return To Retailer' - maybe Nielsen gets them in bulk.

    We probably gave them more bunk data than usable. In the end, I guess I'd have to say that we came out on top because I didn't own a VCR with stereo inputs until they came along.

    --
    No sig for you! Come back one year!
  24. We will be one of the measured families by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I'm posting anon for this...

    We volunteered for the measuring when it showed up in our DirecTivo Showcase a few weeks ago. Yesterday they called us during dinnertime and asked us questions for about 10 minutes about the makeup of our family.

    We're happy to volunteer, if only to support the shows that we like to watch.

  25. TiVO users were offered this by rograndom · · Score: 1

    I was one of the TiVO users selected for this program, but since I work in advertising I was disqualified pretty early in the interview process. I was really looking forward to it too.

  26. ... paper?! by enrico_suave · · Score: 1

    wilco tango foxtrot?!?!

    paper and pencil to document usage of a digital product

    *Shakes head* Not that I have a better way of getting data from different DVR platforms, but it still reeks of ridiculous...

    e.

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  27. When will Nielsen learn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nielsen/EDI just laid off a bunch of people that were collecting data by hand, because their competition was able to collect that same data electronically. Now, they move into the DVR market?

    Sorry, they're already late to the party, and if they even think about forcing pen and paper, they've already doomed themselves.

  28. Paper? $5/week??? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This SO explains what tv companies are doing. Their data is based on people who are willing to fill out a paper jounrla of their viewing activities for 5 bucks a week - i.e. who are fucked up enough to sacrifice their priuvacy for a measly sum that is not even a compensation for the time spent on it, even when you discard any notions of surveillance.

    Let's see, $5 buys how much of my spare time? Maybe 10 minutes if I am generous, less if it's a task I don't like.

    They could NEVER convince me to hand them over my viewing habits unless I knew for certain it would be reliably anonymized. And even then they'd have to pay me more like $100-$400 a week, depending how much effort it is!

    $5/week, I haven't laughed this much in quite a while.

    1. Re:Paper? $5/week??? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $5/Week for writing notes? Quit bitching. Go find out how much the workers who built the Brooklyn Bridge got paid in a week.

      When you do finally find some sucker to pay your ego that much money, go hire a spelling instructor.

    2. Re:Paper? $5/week??? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Ok, troll, I'll bite.

      $20/month. Half the cable bill. To do what? Write down what channel you watched?

      OH NO, BIG BROTHER KNOWS I WATCHED FRESH PRINCE OF BEL AIRE! I'MA GO TO GUANTANAMO BAY NOW!

    3. Re:Paper? $5/week??? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha by triffidsting · · Score: 1

      Five dolla, make you holla!

      --
      Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
  29. g4techtv by sewagemaster · · Score: 1

    perhaps this may give people a better portrail of g4techtv ratings and stop cancelling shows and firing show hosts like the screensavers.

    1. Re:g4techtv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not like anyone worth caring about ever watched G4, TechTV, or G4TechTV in the first place.

    2. Re:g4techtv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The worst thing is, I don't know if you're being sarcastic or serious...

      I miss my Leo :(

  30. On a related note... Why not ratings via DTV? by EdZep · · Score: 1

    Many Direct TV users have a permanent phone connection, primarily for ordering Pay Per View. But, it could also phone home time spent on each channel, at regular intervals. I've often wondered why this hasn't been done (if it isn't already being done).

  31. Redundant? by Romancer · · Score: 1

    I thought that tivo was already doing this.

    wouldn't it be easier to just pay tivo to forward their database to nielsen?

    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
  32. You have all those channels, you should have seen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're all doing Reality TV. Trading Spaces, He's a Lady, Junkyard Wars, cooking shows of all sorts, dating shows of all sorts... Junkyard Wars is really good, Trading Spaces is decent. Most of it is reprehensible.

    You just can't flip without seeing dozens of shaky-cam video feeds with bad lighting and people acting badly. It's the reverse of internet anonymous fuckwad syndrome... put someone in front of a camera and it all becomes bravado.

    So yeah. I'd like to have Discovery Network back from the "reality" phase and showing some documentaries or something. Thing is, the shows I'd like to watch are actually about reality. They're just not gossip.

  33. I got call today by hoyty · · Score: 1

    About 9 AM today I got a call from Nielsen letting me know I was selected for the TiVo program with them. Asked a few questions and said I was in. One question I have is a technical one. First, does it only count if you watch or does it also count what you record? What if you watch a suggestion? Time limit on ratings, I could watch a recorded show a year later? Lastly, what about when you have multiple tivos?

    --
    Hoyty
  34. watching futurama by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I have Tivo and authorized the same. I don't see the need for a paper diary when they can just tell them what my season passes are. Says a lot to have a TV show as a season pass. Basically you really like it.

    Now maybe they will get a clue that they should bring back Futurama. That and not cancell any great shows anymore like Futurama, Farscape, two guys and a girl, family guy, etc...

    Im soooo tired of awesome shows coming out and them getting a good following, but the non-cable channels executives don't have the courage or staying power to keep them on the air.

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  35. WHISKY by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think you meant Whisky Tango Foxtrot

    For Reference:

    Alpha Bravo Charlie Delta
    Echo Foxtrot Golf Hotel
    India Juliet Kilo Lima
    Mike November Oscar Papa
    Quebec Romeo Sierra Tango
    Uniform Victor Whisky X-ray Zulu

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    1. Re:WHISKY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You missed out Yankee

    2. Re:WHISKY by multipartmixed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whoops

      At least you can tell I didn't cut'n'paste it. I just forgot the alphabet. LOL.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  36. I have been writing one for a bit by clusterix · · Score: 1

    The server is almost done. Plan to have SOAP based transfers for client and Tivo-like recording suggestions for viewers to have the incentive to sign up.

    The next big step is a general client SDK licensed under BSD with multiple languages to integrate in any PVR/DVR. Need C++ for MythTV, Python for Freevo, and enough docs to help commercial systems integrate it.

    Not sure how commercially viable it is, or how popular it can be made...

    If anybody wants to work on it with me, please contact me.

  37. Paper Diaries? by chuckw · · Score: 1

    I'm participating in that very program and at least for us, there are no paper diaries. We signed a document that allowed Neilsen to utilize the data TiVo downloads from our recorder on a nightly basis. The reason I agreed to this violation of my privacy is that it allows me to have a direct impact on the shows that I like.

    --
    *Condense fact from the vapor of nuance*
  38. Choice of PVR by Baseclass · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm surprized that here on Slashdot (the epitome of geekiness) more people don't use homebrew PVRs like MythTV or Freevo.

    While I may be a paranoid tinfoil hat wearing nut who doesn't want Tivo knowing what I watch and rewind, my reasoning is dictated more by the fact that I like to customize my box, add functionality, watch videos I download, and freely distribute content to every PC in my house.

    The WAF (wife approval factor) is quite high, and it's definitely a hit with the kids. Add the fact that I've learned way more about Linux in the past year than I did over the past 6 years as a casual user and I consider the project a huge success.

    --
    ^^vv<><>BA
    1. Re:Choice of PVR by Luscious868 · · Score: 1
      I'm surprized that here on Slashdot (the epitome of geekiness) more people don't use homebrew PVRs like MythTV or Freevo.

      It all boils down to time. I looked into setting up a Linux solution, but I didn't have a whole lot of free time on my hands to put togather a box, figure out how to configure the software, test it, etc. Plus I've got digital cable, and I wasn't sure if the software you mention can work with the digital cable box. It took me a trip to Best Buy and about 10 minutes to install and configure TiVo. It's a more expensive way to go, but in this case I wanted something that just worked and I wanted it ASAP.

  39. hahaha by Brightest+Light · · Score: 1

    "He's TIMESHIFTING OUR RIGHTS!!!!" nearly made me spew a mouthfull of water all over my keyboard. thanks for the laughs

  40. Does anyone actually know what troll means? by kiddygrinder · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How did this get modded troll? He's joking you freaks!

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  41. Nielsen not getting along with major ad companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article http://www.livedigitally.com/2004/10/nielsen-ad-ra tings-bully.html (from LIVEdigitally) has some insight about the new "LPM" units, and why the advertisers aren't necessarily playing ball with the new Nielsen technologies. Kinda interesting if you are following this stuff.

  42. Tivo would want real money for the data by KalvinB · · Score: 1

    Tivo can negotiate how much they want for the data they collect. Typical Joe Public can't because another Joe Public will take the $5 and be content since they don't see it as valuable anyway. Tivo knows exactly how much it's worth. And it's more than $5 per viewer per week.

    Just look at how much various shows can pay their cast and demand from advertisers. That kind of information is worth a lot of money.

    Nielson is using a limited number of viewers to extrapolate the larger population. Tivo has access to a much greater population than Nielson can reach. And the data is already entered into a database and ready to be mined using statistical software. There's no time and money consuming data entry by people.

    Ben

  43. Would DVR users *sell* their TV watching history? by poopie · · Score: 1

    As a mythtv user, if there existed a module where I could choose to upload my non-anonymous tv recording and watching history in exchange for say $25/month and some monthly survey, I don't think I'd mind one bit.

  44. I'm DOING IT! by kittenthief · · Score: 1

    I'm Currently doing a Nielson diary this week, when they called they asked if I have a DVR, which I do (Myth DOES count!) The diary itself though is POORLY Designed. This is not the first time I've done a Tv Diary, its just a list of days and times where you list the channel watched...with an additional page at the end for shows recorded but watched later... theres no way to list shows from two months ago that I've recorded, but not watched... and they even call a DVR a DVD (digital video Device) so they have a LONGGGGG way to go yet.. gotta go and update yesterdays viewing ...

  45. Last Post! by boffy_b · · Score: 1

    Last Post!

    --
    Windows is only $500 if your time is worthless.