Slashdot Mirror


U.S. to Get New IP Czar

tetraminoe writes "Reuters is reporting that Congress's latest spending bill provides for the creation of a federal copyright enforcement czar. According to the article, 'Under the program, the president can appoint a copyright law enforcement officer whose job is to coordinate law enforcement efforts aimed at stopping international copyright infringement and to oversee a federal umbrella agency responsible for administering intellectual property law.' It also gives $2 million to the National Intellectual Property Law Enforcement Coordination Council (NIPLAC), created in the '90s and never funded. NIPLAC will work to protect American IP overseas and oversee enforcement."

320 comments

  1. RIAA/MPAA out of a job now by Strog · · Score: 1

    I guess they don't have to police everything themselves now.

    "Forget, we don't want on Internet2 any more"

    1. Re:RIAA/MPAA out of a job now by essreenim · · Score: 0

      The best art is he gets to be called Czar.

      I would have though hell would freeze over before a Republican government would give anyone such a title!!

      Will he be able to give our 'order of Lenin' medals

    2. Re:RIAA/MPAA out of a job now by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. They've scared congress with enough tales of financial ruin that there will be even more heavy handed legislation and most importantly for them, federal enforcement. The civil copyright infringement remedies, which have traditionally relied on the owner for enforcement, have now been transferred to the taxpayers. But somehow I doubt the government would be nearly as responsive if some smalltime software developer asked for federal help to stop illegal distribution of his applications.

    3. Re:RIAA/MPAA out of a job now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the US honouring real property rights and giving the land they STOLE back to the descendants of the natives? Then we'll talk about the rights of the US to enforce "intellectual property", whatever that may be!

    4. Re:RIAA/MPAA out of a job now by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Good luck trying to control piracy and copyright issues. The industry can barely stop a 1k spyware.

    5. Re:RIAA/MPAA out of a job now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt the government would be nearly as responsive if some smalltime software developer asked for federal help to stop illegal distribution of his applications.

      Of course "some smalltime software developer" won't get the same response when they complain to the feds. The more loss involved, the more serious a crime becomes. If someone is losing millions of dollars, a proportionate response would be merited. The nature of a corporation is that it is a group of people. If a bigger corporation has a problem, by definition more people stand to lose. That also includes the shareholders. Many of the folks here at /. derive benefit from these very corporations and their inherent rights as legal entities. However much we may hate the big corporation, they are money machines. Get used to it or go join the rest of the hippies in the unemployment line. /wank wank wank

      I hate lots of corporations. I don't even necessarily agree with the principal. I do, though, recognize that I am a member of a society and culture that have their very basis in corporations and their markets.

      -Jude

    6. Re:RIAA/MPAA out of a job now by tambo · · Score: 1
      The industry can barely stop a 1k spyware. Apples and submarines. The industry has no interest, none whatsoever, to kill spyware on your machine. The only companies that do are those pitching anti-spyware products at you. Sure, those warez could be completely bulletproof, given a billion-dollar market incentive. Don't count on it, though.

      The MPAA, otoh, has an enormous incentive to preserve its bloated cash-cow market. And so they will buy every senator, judge, hardware manufacturer, and code monkey they can until the system serves them again. They can throw more money at the "problem" than you can. Game over, man.

      Now, I have tremendous faith that they'll fuck up their first 500 attempts to develop hardware restrictions that actually work. My concern is that the 501st will probably succeed. Because thanks to all those Britney Spears fans buying her shitty records, the MPAA can keep trying until it gets it right. It's practically a force of nature.

      Our only hope is a representative government that supports its body politic, as a whole, rather than a single mega-wealthy corporation. ... So, yeah, we're fux0red.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    7. Re:RIAA/MPAA out of a job now by tambo · · Score: 1
      I guess they don't have to police everything themselves now.

      Yup. They get us to do it - and to pay for the enforcement, out of our own tax dollars.

      I wonder... Once the RIAA pays enough senators to make copyright infringement punishable by death, do you think they'll send your family a bill for the bullet?

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
  2. I sure hope this IP czar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...is version 6. But knowing the government, I doubt it.

    1. Re:I sure hope this IP czar... by Lispy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I want a pizza too...

    2. Re:I sure hope this IP czar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      remember the password was zion5

  3. Am I the only one by phaze3000 · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Was it just me who read the title of the article and thought IANA was being replaced?

    This is news for nerds, IP should mean Internet Protocol, not some copyright sillyness.

    --
    Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    1. Re:Am I the only one by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As mentioned repeatedly on slashdot, IP law is now critical to nerds. No one can write software and put it out there for the public to use without having to consider IP law (even deciding to put it in the public domain is a decision in IP law). Back in the day, when nerds were all in the basements and few people had a computer no one cared about IP. But with more than half of the US licensing software IP law is more and more a part of everyday lives. And if you're a nerd who programs or even just tinkers it's an important part of your hobby.

      You can personally choose to ignore it, but it's at your own expense. If you don't fight to keep IP laws fair you'll one day find it's illegal or too expensive to be a nerd.

    2. Re:Am I the only one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I disagree with this. The majority of us will continue doing what we've been doing for many years now. Nerds might be physically pathetic, but all of the years of social abuse have left us with a rebellious spirit. Sure, some will cower, but that is where the youth movement comes in. The youth is tired of the abuse as well. Combine us and you have a pretty big problem on your hands if you are attempting to enforce Intellectual Property.

    3. Re:Am I the only one by tambo · · Score: 1
      As mentioned repeatedly on slashdot, IP law is now critical to nerds. No one can write software and put it out there for the public to use without having to consider IP law (even deciding to put it in the public domain is a decision in IP law). Back in the day, when nerds were all in the basements and few people had a computer no one cared about IP. But with more than half of the US licensing software IP law is more and more a part of everyday lives. And if you're a nerd who programs or even just tinkers it's an important part of your hobby.

      You can personally choose to ignore it, but it's at your own expense. If you don't fight to keep IP laws fair you'll one day find it's illegal or too expensive to be a nerd.

      I'm probably your mortal enemy in this regard - I'm a software patent attorney. (But if it's possible, I'm the good kind - I'm horrified by notions of patents on "e-Commerce" and the ISNOT operator - and I want to reform the system so that only truly new, truly useful software gets patented.)

      But I completely agree with you - this issue is too important for software developers, even hobbyists (like me), to disregard. The set of rights and obligations inherent in a patent used to be this weird, insubstantial body of theoretical (imaginary) value. It's become surprisingly concrete and relevant.

      The good news is that the patent process is too expensive to be used frivolously, so once we build up a sufficient store of software prior art (and, hopefully, a competent patent office examining corps), software patents will - like biotech before it - mostly be limited to fights between big companies. Let's hope history repeats itself.

      - David Stein

      --
      Computer over. Virus = very yes.
    4. Re:Am I the only one by ipour · · Score: 1

      You at least have to love the acronym NIPLAC. Sounds like baby formula.

  4. Finally by btwIANAL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am just glad they found a cause better than education to give money to. I was affraid my kids might get an educaion. Everyone knows we cant have that.

    --
    And then they armed me with moderator points and the world mourned.
    1. Re:Finally by Ironsides · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's a meazley $2 million. If you distribute that evenly thats less than a dollar for every kid in school. Not like it would do anything if assigned to education. Besides, cracking down on conterfit goods should increase revenues, which will raise the amount of taxes colelcted which pays for things such as Education, Roads and Security. Besides, the Federal Government doesn't contribute that much to Education in the first place. It's mainly the states and local jurisdictions that pay for it.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Finally by finkployd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am just glad they found a cause better than education to give money to. I was affraid my kids might get an educaion.

      They are getting an education in how government operates and where its priorities are.

      Copyright law, as intended, has certainly jumped the shark and needs to be completely re-writen or eliminated (which, while not ideal would be a better situation than we are heading toward)

      Finkployd

    3. Re:Finally by kmak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ya, because they might vote for Kerry.

      --

      I'm not the devil.. just his advocate.
    4. Re:Finally by JWW · · Score: 1

      The federal government could spend an infinite amount of money on education, and they'd still do everything completely wrong!!

    5. Re:Finally by kfg · · Score: 1

      I am just glad they found a cause better than education to give money to.

      And what makes you think that some of this money won't be spent "educating" your kids about the shame and horror of giving a friend a copy of a CD, or even just loaning it to him, because, you know, he's just borrowing it to copy it?

      I figure they'll drop ten mil just making the movie "File Sharing Madness." History shows that that sort of thing works like a charm.

      KFG

    6. Re:Finally by hype7 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      They are getting an education in how government operates and where its priorities are.

      Copyright law, as intended, has certainly jumped the shark and needs to be completely re-writen or eliminated (which, while not ideal would be a better situation than we are heading toward)


      You'd have thought the lawsuits would have done that for most of the kids.

      Maybe it's me, but the US seems to be heading down a deeper and deeper spiral, with the Government losing sight of the fact it exists for the people, by the people. Instead, it's for the corps, by the corps. Even wars are seen in economic terms.

      Until all the political donations by artificial entities are eliminated, things are going to get a lot worse.

      -- james
    7. Re:Finally by ilyanep · · Score: 0
      Honestly, the US system of education is one of the most overfunded educational systems in the world! The fact is nobody knows how to manage it correctly (I would know, since I'm an 8th grader).

      The Soviet Education system was bankrupt (mostly because the Soviet Union was bankrupt), and they still had no trouble giving what was considered to be one of the best educations in the world!

      We pay $4,200 property tax yearly on a $200,000 house. Then our school goes out and gets some sort of assembly on "caring". Also, in the past two or three years, our school has spent thousands of dollars on student-helped sculptures and stuff. Has this improved our quality of education? Of course not! The only reason we stay in this district is because our school has a 'gifted' magnet class. (Oh, and the computers block slashdot!)

      But that's what happens when bureaucrats manage the school system.

      --
      ~Ilyanep
      To get message, take amount of carrier pigeons at each stage mod 2. Then decode binary.
    8. Re:Finally by neoform · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Copyright law, as intended, has certainly jumped the shark and needs to be completely re-writen or eliminated
      that's true.. but..
      aimed at stopping international copyright infringement
      ..at what point did US law become International law?

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    9. Re:Finally by finkployd · · Score: 1

      aimed at stopping international copyright infringement ..at what point did US law become International law?

      Beats me, they way you wrote that it looks like you are quoting me saying that. I certainly never said anything of the kind.

      Unfortunately, while the US cannot enforce its laws internationally, there has been no problem getting other countries to "harmonize" their laws and enforce them.

      Finkployd

    10. Re:Finally by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking but if you really care about education help us figure out a way that works. We've thrown heaps of money at education and nothing changes. When hillary took over Arkansas education reform they went from almost last to second to last. This problem doesn't get fixed by throwing millions at it. Big city's put an excessive amount of money into education, but have a much lower graduation rate than rural areas.

      If you want a better education all you have to do is get involved with your child cause nobody else will.

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
    11. Re:Finally by miu · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's a meazley $2 million.

      I'm gonna call BS on that right now. The low dollar cost projects SETI, PBS, and NEA have been favorite points of attack for the dems and pubes in their little budget battles for years - any government funding of this sort of philosophical project is an endorsement of it by the recognized rules of engagement.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    12. Re:Finally by prell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The government controls money.
      The government controls the military.
      The government controls the law.
      The government controls the prisons.

      I dunno.. somehow, I don't feel comfortable with the government also controlling the schools.

    13. Re:Finally by Thunderstruck · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, different governments with competing interests control different aspects of the military, the law, the prisons, and most of the schools.

      Lets hope greed and avarice can keep things on an even keel between them.

      --
      Trying to use sarcasm in text-based forums does not work.
    14. Re:Finally by Stiletto · · Score: 1


      You assume that throwing more Federal money at "Education" equates to getting your kids an education.

      There is a mountain of evidence just a Google away that shows that More Federal Money != Better Education For Kids.

    15. Re:Finally by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 1

      But how would copyright law be re-written?
      I don't see how it could be eliminated, as that would allow the GPL to be killed.

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    16. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they sorta control the military. Long as they dont go against the constitution.

    17. Re:Finally by learn+fast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      with the Government losing sight of the fact it exists for the people.

      "The government" is not an intelligent entity. This is, despite all appearances to the contrary, still a democracy, and if the lawmakers get away with doing things like this it's because the people don't care.

      Stuff like this doesn't happen because "the government" is big, and bad, and evil, it's because the people stopped paying attention. Stuff like IP law doesn't show up on literally 99.7% of the population's radar screens. And that's how they're going to get away with it.

    18. Re:Finally by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

      I figure they'll drop ten mil just making the movie "File Sharing Madness." History shows that that sort of thing works like a charm.

      :) Now, that brings back memories. I think Reefer Madness probably had exactly the opposite effect from what was intended.

    19. Re:Finally by cHALiTO · · Score: 1

      maybe, but if it is eliminated we'd practically have no need of the GPL :)

      --
      "Luck is my middle name," said Rincewind, indistinctly. "Mind you, my first name is Bad." -- Terry Pratchett
    20. Re:Finally by kfg · · Score: 1

      Reefer Madness probably had exactly the opposite effect from what was intended.

      Yes. I refer to any argument so ludicrously framed that it not only discredits any validpoints, but all other related arguments as well (they lied to me about pot, therefore they must be lying to me about heroin. I'm going to get high and shoot up to just to say "Fuck you, assholes") as "Reefer Madness Syndrome."

      A Skinnerian might refer to this as "losing your pigeon."

      KFG

    21. Re:Finally by quarkscat · · Score: 1

      Looks like just one more step into the
      twilight zone --
      Next step: Corporate National Socialism.

      Between the "Bono" copyright ammendment,
      DCMA, USA Patriot Act (I), etcetera, no
      IP can be allowed out in the wild -- this
      is yet another step in the corporate endrun
      around any "fair use" and "prior art".
      Expect various "unnamed" corporations to
      use this to crush the F/OSS competition.

    22. Re:Finally by mr_jrt · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, in this copyright-less world of yours, where exactly would the means to enforce the dissemination of any changes you make to source code come from? No copyright means no right to restrict copies. Microsoft could take Linux, add a damn good Win32 layer and release a binary disribution as "Windows Server X".

      Still sound as good?

      --
      Boo.
    23. Re:Finally by scribblej · · Score: 0

      I'm not aware that SETI gets any public funding. Am I wrong?

      If they DO get public funding,t hen I'm going to hop ont he bandwagon saying they should be cut off. I don't want *my* dollars wasted on that shit.

      Then again, I don't want *my* dollars wasted on this shit either. Fat lot of choice I've got, eh?

    24. Re:Finally by EarthlingN · · Score: 1

      Haven't you heard? Corporations are people.

    25. Re:Finally by jafac · · Score: 1

      Copyright law, as intended, has certainly jumped the shark and needs to be completely re-writen or eliminated

      No, let's just go back to the Consitution:

      "Limited Time" was originally 7 years. Okay, that's good.
      ". . to promote the useful arts and sciences" -
      The burden should be on the copyright SEEKER to PROVE that the copyright would "promote the USEFUL arts and sciences", and the copyright should be reviewed (by a board of jurors, selected in the same way court jurors are selected) throughout it's period, and if it's shown that that particular copyright has NOT promoted a useful art or science, then it should be revoked, and the property fall into the Public Domain.

      I think that would go quite a ways towards solving this problem.

      Oh yeah - also, only a human being, a citizen, should be granted a copyright. Corporations are not human beings, they were never endowed any rights by God. Therefore, at the very least, corporations should not be allowed to hold copyrights. Only trademarks. Maybe.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    26. Re:Finally by finkployd · · Score: 1

      I agree, but I would say that going back to the constitution would be a major rewrite from where we are now. And not copyright law at all would be better than this mess.

      Finkployd

    27. Re:Finally by miu · · Score: 1
      I'm not aware that SETI gets any public funding. Am I wrong?

      Actually I don't think it does anymore - it used to be at least partially funded by NASA but was made completely private in the 90's.

      --

      [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
    28. Re:Finally by neoform · · Score: 1

      shame no other country can harmonize with the US concerning their laws..

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    29. Re:Finally by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      It's still a government structure issue. Initially, the united states federal government was designed to have trouble growing.

      Over the following 200+ years, dozens of legal exploits have been found that have allowed the government to grow much larger, and the people who do care have gotten themselves into positions to exploit that.

      It ends up being an education problem in the end, but there's no real movement to support education that teaches people to be responsible citizens and oppose ridiculous government stunts.

      Another issue is the sheer scale of the US federal government. It's so large that there's no real way to keep track of what's going on.

      There's one president to 294,800,000 people.
      For each senator (100), there are 2,948,000 people. The average number of people represented by a senator is twice that. Can two people really claim to speak for 6 million? Is it really democracy at that point any more, or is it just crowd psycology?

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    30. Re:Finally by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      They can do that anyway with *BSD. Hasn't been a problem yet.

      If there were no copyright laws, we could just go ahead and write a compatible version anway - decompiling their code if nessisary.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    31. Re:Finally by nuklearfusion · · Score: 1
      There is a mountain of evidence just a Google away that shows that More Federal Money != Better Education For Kids.

      I have to wonder if thats because all the goverment does with that money is spend it on tests (for "accountibility") instead of teachers, who can actually help the kids.

      --

      There's no such thing as a stupid question, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots.

    32. Re:Finally by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Or perhaps it's because of school boards pissing away millions of tax dollars on sports facilities and programs.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    33. Re:Finally by haruchai · · Score: 1

      Not my kind of people, that's for certain.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    34. Re:Finally by yourmom16 · · Score: 1

      Yes; They don't make linux any worse by doing that, and Linux programmers could reverse engineer it and implement the changes themselves.

      --
      "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
  5. W00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I was so worried the MegaCorps aren't getting the government backing they need. They're so weak and defenseless, what would they do without government intervention?!

    1. Re:W00t! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No joke! And why would the government be worried about defending IP violations in countries where WE HAVE NO AUTHORITY!?! Seriously - let's have the government focus on what's wrong with the US first. Forget about protecting your fat-cat corporate friends - they can handle that on their own just fine. FIX YOUR DAMNED COUNTRY FIRST!

  6. Well by C_Kode · · Score: 1

    It also gives $2 million to the National Intellectual Property Law Enforcement Coordination Council

    Well, at least we know they will have a full set of pens and pencils now...

    1. Re:Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, at least we know they will have a full set of pens and pencils now...

      Might it therefore be called the Property Enforcement Nationally Coordinated Intellectual Law Council?

  7. Department slogan: by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    IP every day.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    1. Re:Department slogan: by Sepper · · Score: 1

      And for the computer crack team

      I TCP/IP but mostly IP

      --
      I live in Soviet Canuckistan you insensitive clod!
  8. IP Czar or P2P Czar by mordors9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I feel so much better knowing my tax money is going to help fund the enforcement efforts of the RIAA and MPAA. Obviously that is much more important than the fact our borders are wide open, that security screeners at the airport are more concerned about searching 78 year old black men and 18 year old young ladies than some more obvious candidates. Sorry for the rant.

    1. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im a 22 year old white guy, and they are super-concerned about searching me. Dont discriminate against my peoples. The screeners are after us too!

    2. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read again. This isn't just movies and music. It's knock off goods posing as real goods. Such as purses, and physical CDs and DVDs. Nothing is mentioned about the internet. This should also include fake Games, computer equipment and many other things posing as real (Official) ones.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    3. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by Golias · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When people get over their knee-jerk "anything that has anything to do with copyright must be t3h suck" reactions, they will hopefully realize that this "IP Czar" idea is a Good Thing.

      IP law is currently enforced by the Justice Department. About three years ago, we were all forcefully made aware that the top levels of our federal enforcement agencies have more important things to do with their time. Shuffling these responsibilities off into a separate, relatively low-cost, department with it's own management frees up a lot of resources that are better used elsewhere.

      For us Regular Joes, it probably only means that the annoying FBI warnings on our DVDs will now be replaced with an annoying IP Czar warning. You can all take off the tin foil hats.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Glad I finally found someone who understand that IP!=**AA

      On a side not, I have seen some companies that have made ther FBI warnings quite humorous. Rhino's transformers DVDs draw a pair of glasses, beard and some other stuff on the guy in the picture on the FBI warning. Be nice if others did something like that instead of giving just the dull warning picture.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    5. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by beeglebug · · Score: 1

      "more concerned about searching 78 year old black men and 18 year old young ladies than some more obvious candidates..."

      I'm not sure exactly who you mean by that, but I bet if I squinted hard enough i'd see an offensive comment between the lines...

    6. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by mbrod · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the rant.

      It is a perfectly valid rant. I am more concerned however that the priority now days seems to be helping existing companies squeeze a few extra percentage points of extra profits out of consumers. The government is actively helping them in this endeaver.

      I would much rather see government put its weight behind creating new technologies and radical concepts that can in turn create entire industries. Like public space travel/space tourism, space mining, hydrogen powered economy instead of petroleam powered one, fusion reactors, innovative public transit systems, automating more of education and making it cheaper, etc.

      Putting extra effort and concentrating time on making sure someone who is already making money makes just a little bit more money is not helping people who aren't making enough money to live, and that is what the role of gov't should be.

    7. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

      Taxes in Canada just go to paying the industry off so they shut up. Yay for legal fileswapping!

      --
      Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
    8. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      I have seen some companies that have made ther FBI warnings quite humorous.

      Ilapallazo is watching you!

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    9. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      The Guns and Dope Party takes this even further: everybody should be a Czar of its own. And yes, they compare the current system in the US to Tsarism.

      I don't know how serious their political aspirations are, but it's a good opinion anyway. Quote from their homepage:

      A MAYBE MAP OF THE FUTURE Position Paper 23E

      The goal of the Guns and Dope Party --
      return to constitutional democracy --
      will probably remain unacceptable to many in this country.
      Especially in the middle of the continent,
      a majority seems to prefer the tyranny of TSOG
      and its associated "faith-based organizations."
      Thus, Western secession must remain on our agenda,
      at least as a distinct "maybe."

      In Freetopia we will end all "faith-based" bans on
      scientific and medical freedom, including the
      verbots against orgonomic medicine, LSD, cloning, stem-cell research etc.
      Every citizen will choose the type of health care he or she wants,
      just as they did in the old U.S. before the Tsarist take-over.
      Every scientist will research whatever she or he finds most interesting.
      In short, we will become full members of the "civilized" world again,
      and ostriches will have the respect they deserve.

      Meanwhile, the Tsarist states will probably
      sink deeper and deeper into barbarism,
      becoming more and more terrified of a world
      that also feels more and more terrified of them --
      until like all closed systems they choke
      on their own entropy [communication jams] and perish.
      Maybe.

      Emphasis mine.

    10. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by mutterc · · Score: 2, Informative
      security screeners at the airport are more concerned about searching 78 year old black men and 18 year old young ladies than some more obvious candidates
      Minor point here...

      Bruce Schneier points out that, if you're not going to search everybody, random searches are more secure than profiled searches.

      Example: Suppose you have the resources to screen 20% of people coming through the airport. You can do this randomly or by a profile. If you select the victims randomly, then a Bad Guy has a 20% chance of getting caught no matter what. However, if you select the victims according to a profile, then if the Bad Guys learn what the profile is, and send someone through who does not fit the profile, they have a 0% chance of getting caught.

      (Of course, he also points out that airport security is mostly security theater, there to make travelers feel safe and show Something Is Being Done).

    11. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Exactly. Except instead of 'if', it's 'when'. They don't have to break into some top secret security system, they just have to try flying a few times and see who doesn't get searched. That person gets to carry the thermonuclear device in their hearing aid or whatever it is we're supposed to be worried about now that cockpit doors can't be forced open and everyone would immediately attack hijackers and, if worse comes to worst, we'd shoot down the plane. (We have an expression around here, it's 'closing the barndoors after the horses escaped'. It's a waste of time and stops you from catching the damn horses.)

      About the same thing applies to the no-fly list. Unless you stop everyone from flying, then some terrorists are going to fly, and it's trivial for them to figure out which ones. Hell, now we've told them which ones we think are terrorists! They can set up some fake terrorist organization for those guys to be a part of.

      Luckily, the no-fly list doesn't work at all, so terrorists are not learning who we think are terrorists, and it's possible we might incorrectly stop terrorists we don't know about from flying. The intent isn't to randomly stop random people from flying, but that appears to be the effect.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    12. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd like to know where the hell the yanks come up with these words... 'czar' to describe a government official? Bizarre.

      Or 'pooh-poohed' thats another good yank-ism.
      Or 'nixed'.

      I could think of about a million more if it wasn't so early in the morning, so lets stick with this 'czar' word.

      Why did Americans start using that Russian word for royalty to describe government officials?

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    13. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by kaustik · · Score: 1

      Interesting site, but they knock their believability with the whole ostrich thing... "Equal rights for Ostriches"

      Weird.

    14. Re:IP Czar or P2P Czar by flyingsquid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, these guys are no better than the Dems and Republicans, I mean they are clearly just a tool of the Ostrich special interest groups...

  9. big deal by SubtleNuance · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Im sure the war on CopyrightAbuse will be as affective as the War on Drugs and the The War on Terra.

    1. Re:big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      War on terra. You don't know how right you are.

    2. Re:big deal by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1



      The war on terra is going well. Just the otherday efforts were renewed to drill in the Alaskan refuge. Terra will yield.

    3. Re:big deal by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Highly effective. Why, millions of dollars have already been diverted away from valuable programs like our pathetically underfunded education system, so it must be working. Otherwise why waste the money, right? I mean, with all of the students turning to drugs and violence because they're the intellectual inferior of an H1-B immigrant from Calcutta who barely speaks english, then the war on drugs and terror must be tremendously effective to have any sort of net gain.

      Trust your government: they're here to help. ...someone. ...we think.

    4. Re:big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? You been deaf for the last fucking 3 years?

    5. Re:big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the education system is not funded primarily by federal taxes to begin with so that point is irrelevant. and the education system does not suffer from a lack of money, but a lack of responsible spending.

      drugs and violence have existed in the schools for what, 40-50 years now? (violence even longer).

      the school system has problems, but dont pretend they are on a shoestring budget, especially when they waste so much money.

    6. Re:big deal by ratamacue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Effective as in creating the first prerequisite for organized crime (a black market), providing justification for more expansion of government powers? Or effective as in fostering hatred and resent around the world, providing justification for more expansion of government powers? If government is lucky, it will be both.

      Any way you look at it, government wins, at the expense of the individual.

      Ending or "winning" the war on drugs, or the war on terror, or poverty, or copyright abuse, is the last thing government wants to do. These programs are set up not to succeed, but to provide a steady stream of revenue and justification for expansion of government powers.

    7. Re:big deal by antiMStroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The rights and liberties of American citizens saw the greatest curtailment in generations over those two wars. I'm afraid you're right.

    8. Re:big deal by Oddly_Drac · · Score: 1

      The War On Terror. Unfortunate acronym.

      Still, now you've won the war on drugs, and nearly all the terrorists are in Guantanomo bay, the war against home-tapers should be over by Christmas.

      I have a much better idea, though. Slap a chainlink fence around the coastline and assume that everyone is a criminal until they can prove otherwise. A bank statement should suffice, because the rich have no reason to commit crime.

      --
      Oddly Draconis
      Too cynical to live, too stubborn to die.
    9. Re:big deal by prell · · Score: 1

      I don't really blame the concept of copyright violation here. I think what you have is a law that was founded on clear and arguably good motives, but is used by invisible people who wield an inordinate and inordained amount of power that allows them to influence and control both the government and the media at the same time.

      Corporations aren't about management and executive wealth. They're about allowing the people with actual marketable skills to do things for trade.

    10. Re:big deal by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      The War on Terra.

      As in Final Fantasy III?

    11. Re:big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laugh if you feel like that, but I for one find the 'War on Terra' more affective than I would like it to be.

    12. Re:big deal by Tokerat · · Score: 1


      Yes, support The War Against Terror!

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    13. Re:big deal by myklgrant · · Score: 1

      Check out the second comic on this page from "GetYourWarOn".
      http://www.mnftiu.cc/mnftiu.cc/war.html
      Michael

    14. Re:big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that was the biggest dissapointment with the cold war....you accidentally won it.

  10. Maybe it's a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Look people. At some point, when there is rampant illegal copying and distribution of creative works, someone is responsible for the damage to the creators. We don't wanna hold the developers responsible for eggregious assistance in infringement. We don't want to sue 12 year olds. So what else is left but for this to become a law enforcement issue?

    1. Re:Maybe it's a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, modded down for a "troll". Un-be-freakin-lievable. If there was ever a good reason to support stronger enforcement of IP Laws, that's exactly it. Peace.

    2. Re:Maybe it's a good idea by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 1

      This to me is more proof that Bush and company are trying to trigger the Apocalypse.

    3. Re:Maybe it's a good idea by quintessencesluglord · · Score: 1

      Err, no.

      The problem was never that the **AA sued people. It was how they went about it. You wanna do the scattergun approach; fine, just make damn sure you can deal with the fallout.

      Lobbying congress with your pet peeves doesn't help either. I sit around wondering why DeCSS isn't covered under freedom of speech. How much more of my rights must I sacrifice to protect theirs? Where is the department for enforcing fair use rights?

      Oh.

      You know it is a bad sign when you can hire out the gov. as your own personal police force.

      There are just as many concerns on the other side, but it doesn't matter. 2 million today, several hundred million years from now, and in the end I won't even be able to afford my own thoughts.

  11. I for one, by Rooktoven · · Score: 1

    Look forward to our Disney-Cartoon Millenial masters.

    --

    Acquiescence leads to obliteration
  12. Not a good feeling about this... by The+I+Shing · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why do I get the idea that this new IP czar isn't going to be concerning himself much with corporations abusing copyright law to silence their critics and prevent parody and satire being made about their property?

    And is he going to work toward finding a middle ground between fair use and IP protection? I have my doubts.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Not a good feeling about this... by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Why do I get the idea that this new IP czar isn't going to be concerning himself much with corporations abusing copyright law to silence their critics and prevent parody and satire being made about their property?

      And is he going to work toward finding a middle ground between fair use and IP protection?


      Well, duh. Where is the money in that? Expect to see copyright violation successfully linked to pirates (arrrr matey) and then terrorism (copyright jihad!) in the future. We must do all we can to protect the patriotic, campaign financing, copyright holding, megacorps from the greedy citizenry.

      "if you excercise your fair use rights than then terrorists have already won"

      Finkployd

    2. Re:Not a good feeling about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do I get the idea that this new IP czar isn't going to be concerning himself much with corporations abusing copyright law to silence their critics and prevent parody and satire being made about their property?

      Because you post on slashdot instead of writing your congressman.

    3. Re:Not a good feeling about this... by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Depends on who's president as this falls under the executive branch. Republicans will be the most corporate biased. Democrats slightly less. Ralph Nader would be the most individual-focused.

      If Lawrence Lessig ever gets appointed to the position then we'd have nothing to worry about.

    4. Re:Not a good feeling about this... by g0hare · · Score: 1

      your congressman does not give one fuck about you unless you donate thousands of dollars to his campaign.

      --
      Vote Quimby!
    5. Re:Not a good feeling about this... by Golias · · Score: 1

      Wired magazine ran a very interesting chart last week showing the levels of campaign contributions.

      The candidates in the last election had a lower percentage of corporate gifts (or PACs or Unions) than any modern Presidential candidates.

      Well over 70% John Kerry's funding came from single-donor contributions of $2000 or less. Most of the remaining funding came from corporations, and a little from PACs and Unions.

      George W. Bush's funding? 92%

      Granted, George Soros and a few other rich Democrats managed to slip in a lot of pro-Kerry money through 527s, but there were very few 527s which relied heavilly on corporation money.

      The only pro-Bush 527 of note (the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth) probably even came close to turning a small profit, thanks to the sale of their best-selling Kerry-bashing book.

      In other words, candidates from both parties relied much more on passing the hat among ordinary citizens to fund their campaigns than on corporate money.

      So the bottom line here: The notion that corporations like ADM (one of the largest corporate contributers to both parties) "own" our candidates, while very sexy and fashionable to believe, is a total myth.

      In spite of all the Frontline documetaries "investigating" the golf tournaments and dinners that corporate donors get, the actual numbers show that both Kerry and Bush were both, contrary to conventional wisdom, grassroots candidates who raised most of their money via church meetings, mass mailings, and web sites.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    6. Re:Not a good feeling about this... by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      So one election less proportionately corporate-funded and our representatives are now paying less attention to corporations than citizens? Pretty naiive. It still costs $15,000+ to have a cup of coffee with the president. That's any time in the next four years. If you pay enough you can sleep in the Lincoln bedroom. The rich still have by far the most visibility and direct say with representatives. Corporate spending on lobbying is higher than ever. Are you saying citizens have stronger lobbying? Hardly.

      You're ignoring everything but one election's donations. Taken as a whole corporations still have a far bigger say in US government than individuals.

  13. Imagine! by tkrotchko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its comforting to know that a government agency will be responsible for ensuring the MPAA and RIAA are profitable.

    And we get to pay for it both on the enforcement and higher prices caused by inefficient distribution systems.

    What a warm way to start this holiday.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    1. Re:Imagine! by CumInHerTaco · · Score: 1

      While NIPLAC has been around since the early 1990s, it has never done anything, and appropriators hope that giving the organization $2 million and a new charter will make the office effective.

      Boss: Johnson, you've been with the company for 14 years now...

      Johnson: Yeah...

      Boss: Well, we can't seem to find any record of one singal thing you've done, the entire time you've been with us. Not one.

      Johnson: Yeah...

      Boss: Well, great job Johnson! Diligence like yours should be rewarded, which is why we're promoting you with a big fat raise.

      Johnson: Yeah?

      Boss: And, we're giving you a $2,000,000 bonus. We thought that this would help make you more effective.

      Johnson: Yeah!

      Boss: Keep up the good work....

      --
      The only way to end war is for everyone to get a piece!
  14. VOLTRON! by Luigi30 · · Score: 2, Funny

    The power of the MPAA, RIAA, and FBI have combined to firm... NIPLAC!

    --
    503 Sig Unavailable

    The Signature could not be accessed. Please try again later or contact the administrator
    1. Re:VOLTRON! by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      combined to firm... NIPLAC

      I hope the nipple police have really cool uniforms like the name suggests and really big.....Oops, did I say that out loud.

    2. Re:VOLTRON! by Cylix · · Score: 2, Funny

      W can then say his really nifty new catch phrase, "And I'll Form The Head!"

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  15. Czar invades Russia! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we'll finally stop screwing around like a bunch of liberals, and invade Russia to stop their theft of honest American labor. Once we've got them whipped, it's on to China! The Czar rides again!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Czar invades Russia! by northcat · · Score: 1

      Why isnt parent modded as flamebait or troll.

    2. Re:Czar invades Russia! by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Because sarcasm and hyperbole doesn't always draw flames, predictably useless responses, or get suppressed by moderators.

      Why doesn't your post say something worthwhile about US copyright jurisdiction expanding around the world?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Czar invades Russia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Why isnt parent modded as flamebait or troll.

      I don't know. Why can't you punctuate? Taking a stab in the dark, I'm guessing the punctuation gene is tied to the humor and satire genes. As for the moderation, there's no way to know, since no one can see the former, but the latter is apparent from the current "Score:4, Funny".

    4. Re:Czar invades Russia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't get the joke, look up the origin of the word Czar.

  16. Canada Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And I thought I could avoid the US copyright insanity by living in Canada!

    1. Re:Canada Eh? by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      Well maybe the one good thing that will come out of this is that the US will invade Canada :)
      But don't worry, nothing much will happen. 2 mil should cover the Czar's salary.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    2. Re:Canada Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw that! The Americans can keep their IP crap right where it belongs.

      I don't even visit the states anymore just because of the annoyance of crossing the border. Someone wants to hire me? Telecommute baby!

    3. Re:Canada Eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course Americans need to protect their IP vigorously,.. intellect in general is obviously becoming pretty scarce in a lot of states. But if the US does invade Canada we'll at least be able to influence your next election :-)

  17. The real question by nametaken · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will they also be responsible for sifting through and cutting short spurious IP claims?

  18. Re:First by strider5 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe instead they should have allocated more money for USPTO auditors so we can put a stop to people gaining patents for shit like shoelaces by calling them:

    "cords made of woven fibers, providing tension across multiple eyelets to prevent footcoverings from falling free of the body"

    seriously, this is bananas. what next?

    --
    "All that glitters is not gold"
  19. Why aren't I comforted by this? by yetanothermike · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'd prefer that someone appoints some decent litigators, legislators and judges to look at reforming the actual laws instead of inforcement of those which are already botched.

    Anyone else breaking out their sleds? I see a great slippery slope to head down...

    --

    [insert sig file here]

  20. How? by Locdonan · · Score: 1, Funny

    How can a czar (of all things) enforce our laws in another country? Other than certain areas where our law is recognized, we would be SOL! I can jsut see it.

    "Hello Nigeria, we have about 4000 people we need to have you arrest for sending spam and rerouting information over the internet in a effort to scam our residents. What are you laughing at? Stop it! Hello? Hello? Oh well, we will try again tomorrow."

    I can't imagine this actually taking hold.

    --
    If I wrote something witty, you would say I stole it from somewhere.
    1. Re:How? by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      How can a czar (of all things) enforce our laws in another country? Other than certain areas where our law is recognized, we would be SOL! I can jsut see it.

      Look at what we did to arrest Saddam Hussein... and he only had a couple of fake paintings. Well that and a few huminitarian crisises (isn't that what the UN has renamed genocide to).
      Seriously, it is about time the world focuses on horrible things like IP theft our resources are being very well squandered.

    2. Re:How? by LabRat007 · · Score: 1

      "How can a czar (of all things) enforce our laws in another country? Other than certain areas where our law is recognized, we would be SOL!"


      I can remember a couple of russians that were tricked into coming to the US to be arested. I cant remember what their "crime" was, it may have been IP related but I'm not sure. The point is the US Government has a habit of enforcing it will outside it's supposed area of governance.

      Highlights include...
      Korea
      Vietnam
      Iraq
      Iraq II the return of the Bush
      Iran (I've only seen the trailers but it looks big budget)

      Don't kid yourself we will certianly nail a few citizen outside the US in some fasion just to piss of a few world governments so they know where their place is.

      I don't personally see this ending until the US suffers a serious economic colapse or severe problems at home require military intervention (like the happy situation Russia has going on).

      --
      "Capital punishment makes the state into a murderer. Imprisonment makes the state into a gay dungeon-master"
  21. I for one... by ravenspear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    welcome our new Gov. enforcing, brutally regulating, fiercely punishing, justice mutilating, freedom curtailing, property upholding, paradigm shattering, useless blathering IP overlords.

    1. Re:I for one... by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 1

      And it's already November, so we have to wait until next October overthrow and kill the czar.

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
    2. Re:I for one... by automag · · Score: 1

      Gimme an 1... Gimmie an 9... Gimmie an 8... Gimmie an 4. What's that spell? Goodbye freedom. Helllooo Big Brother.

      --
      ---As my daddy used to tell me: "You gotta be smart before you can be a smartass."
    3. Re:I for one... by 320mb · · Score: 0

      Well all this copyright and IP garbage means NOTHING to me........if I need something done in LINUX, I will write my own $BASH script or $PERL program and just share it with my friends instead of releasing it as GPL.......... I will do what I want and it does not matter what the GOV'T says........!! so there

      --
      === 'Kernel Panic' no sig found:
    4. Re:I for one... by jeffasselin · · Score: 1

      You should learn some history. The October Revolution took place in November, on the 7th to be more precise:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_Revolution

      --
      If he explores all forms and substances Straight homeward to their symbol-essences; He shall not die.
    5. Re:I for one... by xsupergr0verx · · Score: 1

      I am aware, it was part of the joke. Fwooosh!

      --

      Click here for a free picture of an iPod!
  22. well thank god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...we didn't spend it on education or anything stupid like that.

    That isn't flamebait and yes, i know we have edu money, but if you think it's enough, go hang out in k-12 and then hit up a state higher ed. campus. It's not enough.

  23. Why NIPLAC? by The+Dodger · · Score: 2, Funny

    I guess NIPLECC was too close for comfort. :-)

    D.

    1. Re:Why NIPLAC? by sd.fhasldff · · Score: 1

      You know it.

      It's the NIPLE Coordination Council.

      Hopefully, they'll do more than just scratch their arses... or maybe not.

    2. Re:Why NIPLAC? by clickster · · Score: 1

      Well, they were going to use NIPLECC, but FCC was refusing to let anyone use that on the air. They were going to start a new anti-piracy campaign, but I think their publicity dept. pretty much killed them. Apparently their idea for a great commercial was: Janet: "Give me your cheapest mocha latte" Employee: "Cheapest? Aren't you rich?" Janet: "I'm so poor these days. Everyone is 'stealing' my music. Who will protect me?" Duck: "NIPLECC!!!!" Janet: "I know I wrote that anti-piracy number down here somewhere" Apparently they thought that would get young kids attention. Go figure

      --
      If you mod me down, I shall become less powerful than you could possibly imagine.
  24. NIPLAC? by computational+super · · Score: 1

    NIPLAC... yeah, I think my wife still has one of those left over from when she was breastfeeding...

    --
    Proud neuron in the Slashdot hivemind since 2002.
  25. Senator Hatch by PortHaven · · Score: 2, Funny

    Needs to be tarred, feathered and deballed!

  26. Because we all know... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... the copyright industry lacks sufficient funds to sue infringers on their own. Poor Disney. Poor Sony. Poor Universal. These guys really need a break!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:Because we all know... by Ironsides · · Score: 1, Informative

      RTFA, this doesn't include just movies and music. It covers physical goods such as Clothing and other things. It will also cover books, electronics, games, hardware.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Because we all know... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, we all know that the clothing industry is broke too. Heck, they use sweatshops to create their product. They must REALLY be broke. I have such sympathy for ALL of the IP industries.

      I wonder if we'll get a Fair-Use Czar to help consumers from being screwed?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    3. Re:Because we all know... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Well, since it is the next story on slashdot. how about making sure that when people buy batteries for their cell phones they make sure that they are getting batteries from the company and not know offs? Since their seem to be exploding cell phones in the news yet again.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    4. Re:Because we all know... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      It's easy to know you're buying cheap knockoff: THE PRICE IS VERY LOW!!! If the price is too good to be true, it's a cheap knockoff! Do you really need a government agency to tell you that?!

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    5. Re:Because we all know... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Not all have very low prices. Many just masquerade as the same item at a similar price (maybe a buck less, maybe the same price). Same goes for video games, memmory, phones...

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    6. Re:Because we all know... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      And the fact that you're buying them from a back of a truck doesn't give you a clue?

      Seriously, if someone is violating Motorola's IP, why does the government have to bring a lawsuit?! Why should I pay higher taxes to protect businesses who only want to screw me over, e.g., making cell phones that require specific and much more expensive batteries.

      If you think the government should be Corporate America's lackey, that's your right. But I totally disagree.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    7. Re:Because we all know... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about the back of a truck? You have some really bad info about this stuff. A lot of counterfit goods are sold right along the real things in shops and kiosks in malls. The shops never buy directly from the manufacturers, they all buy through distributers. If they come across a distributer out to make a couple of extra bucks thats passing on coutnerfits, or someone who claims to be an authorized distributer selling for near the regular price, you get a counterfit without even knowing it. This has nothing to do with selling dirt cheap or off the back of a truck or anything that looks shady to the end retailer and the customer. The smartest counterfitters sell their knock offs within a few percent of the regular price so that it doesn't look suspicious to anyone and looks like a regular discount. No one is the wizer until something bad happens.

      If you think the government should be Corporate America's lackey, that's your right. But I totally disagree.

      So if someone started to sell knock off GE microwaves that happened to have a habit of exploding, it would ruin GEs reputation. Corporations have money but they don't always have the authority to go after people. I hate to say this but, sometimes without Government intervention you can't stop a problem.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    8. Re:Because we all know... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Corporations certainly have the authority to stop manufactures from selling knock offs. They can file injunctions, they can confiscate merchandise, they can do ANY thing the government can do except lock people up. Heck, if the infringer violated any civil court order, the corporation could even move to have him or her locked up. So, I guess they can do EVERYTHING the government could do.

      Once again, why should I pay police to settle what are essentially disputes between businesses?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    9. Re:Because we all know... by antiMStroll · · Score: 1
      " It covers physical goods such as Clothing..."

      Finally, an end to all those highly publicized Fruit of the Loom lawsuits!

    10. Re:Because we all know... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Corporations can not:
      Do sting operations
      Get a hold of shipping records
      Send people in undercover
      Force another company to turn over who they are buying their merchandise from
      Many other things necessary in finding out where a lot of stuff is coming from.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    11. Re:Because we all know... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Corporations DO perform sting operations. There is nothing stoping a coporation from hiring a person to go and buy a knockoff to be used latter in evidence.

      Corporations CAN get shipping records. It's called discovery.

      Corporations CAN send people in undercover, see my first answer.

      Corporations can get any information they want via discovery.

      Anything else?

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    12. Re:Because we all know... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      So tell me then how you find the guy thats distributing the fake merchandise when he's already changed addresses, you have no idea where he is, the landlord doesn't give a shit, and you can't get an injunction against a landlord or file a lawsuit when you don't know who you are suing. Add to that the fact that a lot of this is taking place across national borders and you can't even find out what country the goods are coming from. Sometimes it is possible for a corporation to find out, but most times it is not.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    13. Re:Because we all know... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Here's a hypothetical:

      Imagine that Sony discovers that Best Buy might be selling knockoff camera batteries. Sony could send an employee over to Best Buy to buy one of the batteries.

      Once it is determined it is a knockoff, Sony could file a lawsuit for ex parte injunction. There would be no hearing. Basically the judge would sign an order giving Sony the right to all of the knockoffs and the right to obtain information about where Best Buy got them from.

      Sony would send its process servers out to Best Buy and collect all the batteries and would be given the records.

      Sony would then amend their lawsuit to name the party who sold the batteries. They'd continue with this process until they got the factory who made them.

      This type of thing happens EVERY day in the US. It isn't hard to do at all and it's perfectly legal.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    14. Re:Because we all know... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Exactly how is the government supposed to "find the guy"?! If the government can find him, then certainly a multi-national corporation can.

      And, in case you don't know, the FBI doesn't have much jurisdiction outside the US. Considering that a company such as Sony has a presense in nearly every country on earth, I'd think it would have better luck catching the guy than the FBI.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    15. Re:Because we all know... by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      First off, most of this stuff happens with the small guys, but lets poke holes in this one

      Sony files injunction against Best Buy
      Best buy didn't know they were knockoffs and directs Sony to who they bought from
      Sony goes to distributer who says who he bought bateries from
      Guy who distributer bought batteries from is over seas and has since closed up shop and changed name/address etc... being a front for a counterfitting group. Who they gonna sue? Neither the distributor nor best buy were doing anything illegal and the counterfiters have disapeared. Oh, and selling counterfits are not illegal unless you know they are counterfit.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    16. Re:Because we all know... by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      "Who they gonna sue?"

      And if the FBI was involved, who would they arrest?!

      You're not aruging in support of your position, you're only arguing that the law is not simple.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    17. Re:Because we all know... by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      The only reason the clothing industry is getting ripped off is because it's relying on promotion instead of quality.

      It really shouldn't be possible to make a profit by making medium quaility tennis shoes in Asia, putting a fake label on them, and reselling them for a profit here, except that that's also what Nike is doing, except that Nike spends a hell of a lot of money promoting its name.

      I don't really have an sympathy for Nike or the idiots buying their shoes or the idiots buying knockoffs, and I'd rather my tax dollars didn't go to stopping this 'problem'. It'd be one thing if the knockoffs were poorer quality, I'd feel sorry for purchasers of the fakes, but Nike's aren't sold on quality. The knockoffs are pretty much the same quality.

      I couldn't care less if the person making money off your shoes is the person who made you want to have Nikes, or a person who was smart enough to figure out the only reason you were purchasing them was the name.

      And pretending multi-nationals don't have the money to go after stuff like this is inane. If the government were less corrupt, I'd express hope that this would help people who couldn't cover the cost of their own lawsuit, like a garage-inventor who patents something and gets ripped off by a large corperatation, but excuse me while I go laugh my head off at the idea of the government actually caring about individual people.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    18. Re:Because we all know... by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      Actually, using an amazing existing interface called the courts system, a corporatin can do most (if not all) of those things.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
  27. Huh? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Obviously that is much more important than the fact our borders are wide open, that security screeners at the airport are more concerned about searching 78 year old black men and 18 year old young ladies than some more obvious candidates.
    Airport and border security have always been a joke. The point of the TSA is to con you into thinking you're "safe" so you'll go about your life instead of cowering in fear.
    I feel so much better knowing my tax money is going to help fund the enforcement efforts of the RIAA and MPAA.

    As for being the enforcement arm of the *AA, this country's core creed is "the protection of capital" even to the point of propping up failed business models (hey, it works for Amtrak and the Big Three Airlines). Ignore that at your peril.

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Huh? by DaHat · · Score: 4, Funny

      Airport and border security have always been a joke. The point of the TSA is to con you into thinking you're "safe" so you'll go about your life instead of cowering in fear.

      Shhh, don't say that too loud.

      Do you want the population to hear you undermining our system of security? Every time you criticize our leaders and the safeguards they have put in place to keep you and me safe... you help the terrorists win.

    2. Re:Huh? by LihTox · · Score: 1
      Airport and border security have always been a joke. The point of the TSA is to con you into thinking you're "safe" so you'll go about your life instead of cowering in fear.

      Some would say that the current administration would prefer you to be cowering in fear (and supporting its actions).

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...so you'll go about your life instead of cowering in fear.

      s/instead of/ /

    4. Re:Huh? by kfg · · Score: 1

      Airport and border security have always been a joke. The point of the TSA is to con you into thinking you're "safe" so you'll go about your life instead of cowering in fear.

      It ain't workin'. I can't fly anymore because I'm cowering in fear of the morons in security who haven't got the brains or basic good sense of the plastic crochet hooks they confiscate from grannies.

      . . .this country's core creed is "the protection of capital" even to the point of propping up failed business models. . .

      I'm changing my name to Chrysler, And I am going down to Washington DC
      And I will tell some power broker, what they did for Ioccoca
      Will be perfectly acceptable to me.

      I'm changing my name to Chrysler, and I am getting in that great receiving line
      And when they hand a million grand out, I'll be standing with my hand out
      Yes sir, I'll get mine

      -- Tom Paxton

      KFG

    5. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point of the TSA is to con you into thinking you're "safe" so you'll go about your life instead of cowering in fear.

      No, the point of the TSA is to convince you that you're not safe unless you submit to the ever-watchful and magnaminous eye of friendly government agents.

    6. Re:Huh? by prell · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think we do have a problem in trying to maintain businesses indefinitely, and many times we blatantly reference the size and age of the businesses as arguments as to why they should be helped. If a business is ailing, let it die. Procuring money and maintaining failed business models creates a very perverse and greedy economy that is no longer based on trade.

    7. Re:Huh? by goatan · · Score: 1
      I'm cowering in fear of the morons in security who haven't got the brains or basic good sense of the plastic crochet hooks they confiscate from grannies.

      You fool they could have someone's eye's out with those hooks.

      That was something my granny used to say whenever I picked up something she didn't want me to touch, even if it was the size of my head. Ironically she was often doing crochet.

      --
      Saying Apple is better than MS is like saying Botulism is better than rabies.

    8. Re:Huh? by kfg · · Score: 1

      You fool they could have someone's eye's out with those hooks. That was something my granny used to say whenever I picked up something she didn't want me to touch. . .

      I got back at my granny for saying that. I replied:

      "I could? Cool!"

      Then ran out of the house with the item.

      KFG

    9. Re:Huh? by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1
      The point of the TSA is to con you into thinking you're "safe" so you'll go about your life instead of cowering in fear

      Actually, keeping you in fear is part of the plan, but they still have to look like they are trying. That way you won't care if they have to take away some of your rights to help them with their difficult task of "protecting" you.

      3000 people died on 9/11, and that is a terrible thing, but 40,000 people die in traffic accidents in the US every year. Would they give up their rights for that?

      Perspective is clearly lacking when the fear factor is played up.

    10. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your also forgetting that 3000 died in 1 day where as 40000 in 1 year.

    11. Re:Huh? by Kernel+Kurtz · · Score: 1

      3 years later, its still 3000.

      Car accidents have now claimed 120,000

  28. They stole my idea! by Meredeth · · Score: 1

    Quote form the article " While NIPLAC has been around since the early 90's, it has never done anything" and it gets 2 million dollars! Thats my life plan and they stole it from us. I'm going to sue. Who do I speak to?

    1. Re:They stole my idea! by mr_z_beeblebrox · · Score: 1

      Thats my life plan and they stole it from us. I'm going to sue. Who do I speak to?

      If you wrote the plan down, you could speak to Niplac, that would be copyright abuse.

  29. While another article illustrates that the by Sai+Babu · · Score: 1

    motion picture industry can take care of itself.

    Actor violates copyright

  30. &^#*(^$ Lazy Editors! by shaneh0 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's spelled c - a - r.

    IDIOTS!

  31. Better yet... by Mipsalawishus · · Score: 1

    IP in my computer.

    1. Re:Better yet... by banana+fiend · · Score: 1

      Or even..

      IP in YOUR computer

      --
      Johns: Well, how does it look now? Riddick: Looks clear.
  32. War on..... by Pinkoir · · Score: 1

    So if the Drug Czar runs the War on Drugs and the Intelligence Czars wage the War on Terror what does the IP Czar run? The War on Freedom?

    I sure hope not.

    -Pinkoir

    1. Re:War on..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or

      War on Intellectuals
      War on Property
      War on IP Freely ...

  33. WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by Le+Marteau · · Score: 5, Insightful

    'Czar'? Weren't czar's, like, emperors who had ultimate rule in a non-free society?

    Is that what it's come down to in 21st century America? 'Czar's?

    At least the US gubment is going out in the open about it. No more of this pussy footing about the real intent here: screw freedom. Drug Czars, IP Czars, what next?

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
    1. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Well, we were going to save the surprise for later, but we've had plans in the works now for kicking puppy dogs and stealing children.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Govermnent bureaucrats are typically older than slashdotters.

      The older generation is still stuck on telling each other "In Czarist Russia" instead of "In Soviet Russia" jokes.

    3. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by truthsearch · · Score: 3, Informative

      IIRC czar was the Russian word for Ceasar. The ceasar of Rome ruled a republic (most of the time). Although the balance of power continually shifted, ceasar was not "the ultimate rule in a non-free society." Elected senators wrote laws.

    4. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Insightful
      > 'Czar'? Weren't czar's, like, emperors who had ultimate rule in a non-free society?
      >
      >Is that what it's come down to in 21st century America? 'Czar's?
      >
      >At least the US gubment is going out in the open about it. No more of this pussy footing about the real intent here: screw freedom. Drug Czars, IP Czars, what next?

      In Tsarist Russia, Soviet Russia came next.

      You know the grand experiment in freedom has ended when Yakov Smirnoff jokes start sounding like a cross between Cold War era history textbooks and tonight's evening news.

    5. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nyet, that's what we WANTED you to think! Muhahahaha!"

      ["Russia" sign flips over to "Soviet Union"]

    6. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by Mant · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're a little of base there.

      Originally Caesar was Julius Caesar's name, nothing more. It was later taken by his grand-nephew, Octavius the first Emperor, and later became a title.

      This Wikipedia article has some info.

      You seem to be thinking of Consuls, the highest executive office in the Roman republic. The Caesers after Julius where Emperors, and ruled an empire, not a replublic.

    7. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by ratamacue · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's marketing. "Czar" just sounds so much more "secret spy movie star" than "program director". Just like "war on terror" sounds much more righteous than "military conquest".

    8. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where are my mod points when I need them? :)

    9. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by NoMercy · · Score: 0

      A male monarch or emperor, especially one of the emperors who ruled Russia until the revolution of 1917.

      It's not Caeser, it's prounanced zar, (zaa not zee like most american z's though).

    10. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The grandparent post was providing some background information on the origin of the word czar, which is derived from caesar.

    11. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by multiplexo · · Score: 1

      No shit! The czars were a bunch of useless, tyrannical, stupid, lazy inbred bastards (sort of like our current president). Now we have a drug czar (who is a good guy, as opposed to the drug "lords" who are bad guys) and are going to get an IP "czar". I'd love to see a meme get started where, whenever the government appoints someone as "czar" of something we just start calling them "fuerher" instead. So instead of having a drug czar we would have a drug fuehrer, IP fuerher, etc, etc.

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    12. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by Groovus · · Score: 1

      You're mostly right, although at times the Republic allowed itself to be run by a Dictator which eventually came to supersede the Consuls and Senate/House. Some of the dictators included Sulla and Julius himself - these last coincided with (caused?) the defacto end of the Republic.

      To the topic at hand - whatever happened to small government? What ever happened to the rights and freedoms of the citizens of this country? This is a non-partisan problem at this point. Both parties are tax and spend parties (pay now or pay later is your only option) well in the clutches of big business (just different big businesses). I don't believe in heaven and hell, but if there is a hell I sure hope the foolish judges who gave corporations legal personhood beginning around 1877 and culminating in 1886 with the egrigious Southern Pacific ruling roast in it for all eternity.

    13. Re:WTF is this 'CZAR' BS? by NoMercy · · Score: 1

      In the 17th century, the origin of the word is only really misleading in it's modern context, and since I would imagine a large percentage of the population of the west is ignorant of west european history I think it's not really the best thing to be pointing out how the caesar word was adoped into the Slavic languages as a term for Emperor.

  34. US ALWAYS TRIES TO RULE THE WORLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know this is just a ploy to sue the world
    if they infringe on anything US patent and copyright
    even though it costs too much to fight it.
    Thats why China wont sign the WTO and allow
    this kind of Economic Emperialism to spread!

    Suck on that

    Ching Gao

  35. And the President's first appointee will be...? by adamh526 · · Score: 2, Funny

    None other than Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah).

  36. Me either.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you'll notice *who* gets to appoint said position, the President - i don't have a good feeling about that either.

    1. Re:Me either.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only we had another Democrat President who could appoint enforcement officers who shoot innocent women holding the babies, abduct Cuban children from their families, and burn down the communes of "wrong" religious sects, all our civil rights would be much more safe.

    2. Re:Me either.... by Coral+Snake+USA · · Score: 1

      Actually I don't think you have to worry that much. I DON'T think that President Bush has ANY interest in protecting the IP of those who voted for and promoted John Kerry and promoted Michael Moore.

  37. So ..... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Is this guy going to be spearheading more commando-style raids by the RIAA of little old Mac using grannies?

    Is there any reason to expect this won't just be a post to make sure that big business continues to suddenly have their own law-enforcement branch, as opposed to actually having any interest in the consumer??

    Will Microsoft now get to buy a judgement saying that Linux already infringes and is therefore illegal?

    Sigh More protectionistic laws to come out of America are what I forsee here. But I'm sure they'll start putting pressure on Micronesia and The North pole and the like to harmonize their copyright laws with the US so we can all bend over^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^Hbow down as we should.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  38. Patent wars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...protect American IP overseas..." ..
    does that mean the US starts bombing Europe when we don't allow software patents? It wouldn't surprise me.

  39. Potentially useful for USA, but... by petersam · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Now the creation of someone to coordinate the United States' efforts to enforce international copyright law would be a good thing; who here thinks that its a good thing that you can buy "Oceans 12" or "Half Life 2" on the streets of Hong Kong today for 50 cents? With the WTO making the rules these days and our jobs being outsourced, I'm all for leveling the playing field and making sure that US companies and artists get compensated for their work.

    The bad news is that the other posters are right - this czar will probably focus more on coordinating the RIAA/MPAA legal fights and forcing computer makers to build in DRM so that I can't even legally backup copies of my own CDs/DVDs/etc.

    It frustrates me to see people who *share* content getting more persecuted/prosecuted than those who try to profit from stolen content - the real pirates.

    1. Re:Potentially useful for USA, but... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now the creation of someone to coordinate the United States' efforts to enforce international copyright law would be a good thing; who here thinks that its a good thing that you can buy "Oceans 12" or "Half Life 2" on the streets of Hong Kong today for 50 cents?

      I think that there should be only two precepts of international copyright law: 1) National treatment, i.e. that you treat foreigners the same as one's own people, and 2) Avoidance of conflicts so that obtaining a copyright in one place doesn't preclude you from being able to in some other place.

      There should NOT be any minimum standards, however. If a country feels it is in its own best interests to have more copyright or less copyright than another, or no copyright at all, then that is a perfectly valid decision and should be respected.

      So to answer your question, if China thinks it's okay to have cheap pirated copies of just-released or unreleased works, then I think that that's fine. It's their decision. We don't have to follow it, but by the same token, they shouldn't have to follow us.

      I'm all for leveling the playing field and making sure that US companies and artists get compensated for their work.

      The problem is that the level playing field is still in the advantage of the US and Europe basically, because it is up to their level. And anyway, why should other countries care if we make money? Let it be our concern, and let their law be their concern.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  40. Good to know by booyah · · Score: 1

    Good to know that Ashcroft will continue to have a place in our fair and unbiased government

    damn, and i said that with a straight face

    --
    #include sig.h
  41. The new spending bill by shaneh0 · · Score: 1

    The new spending bill also included a clause that makes it illegal for States to enforce laws forcing HMO's and other insurance companies to cover abortions as a legitimate medical procedure.

    And if Democrats hadn't caught it last week, it would have contained a paragraph allowing any member of congress or their "agents" to have undocumented access to any citizens tax return.

    Currently the director of the IRS has discretion over whether or not a congressmen or anyone else can view tax returns.

    The Republican leadership claims they don't know how it got there. They have blamed it on "A few aides, and maybe someone working at the IRS"

    This is a major piece of legislation! They know damn well who made the changes but they're not going to tell us.

    All this bullshit and this is the VERY FIRST BILL PASSED after the election. The GOP thinks it has a "mandate" and this is how they're using it.

    This concludes the broadcast for this evening.

    Courage.

    1. Re:The new spending bill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      All this bullshit and this is the VERY FIRST BILL PASSED after the election. The GOP thinks it has a "mandate" and this is how they're using it.

      Actually, the Senate struck down that bit of the bill.

  42. Chaps My Hide… by automag · · Score: 1
    Great. Another way for big corporations to use my tax dollars to go find abusers in other countries while here at hope we are still stuck with the same laws that still don't work- no matter how hard the politicians try to make the DMCA relevant. You know, originally copyright was intended to protect individual folks like me- people who create stuff. Now it seems to be the dominion of corporate giants who use it to bludgeon those for which the law was put in place for.

    Now I know that *really* updating copyright law is akin to abolishing Medicare or Social Security on the list of things that 'won't be discussed by those who want to keep their cushy political jobs... EVER,' but we can dream, can't we?

    --
    ---As my daddy used to tell me: "You gotta be smart before you can be a smartass."
  43. Tired of the whole "Czar" thing by CheeseTroll · · Score: 3, Funny

    How about "Drug Fuhrer"?
    "Education Pharoah"?
    "Emperor of Homeland Security"?

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  44. Government propping up private enterprise by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "While congressional aides said there was a lot of support for the program, its inclusion still raised some eyebrows as there have been questions about the government's involvement in protecting a private, for-profit enterprise. A recent congressional attempt to approve legislation known as the "Pirate Act," which would allow the Justice Department to file civil lawsuits, was turned back over complaints that it would advance Hollywood's interest at taxpayer expense.

    "This isn't the Pirate Act, but I think the taxpayers would be surprised that there's money being spent for copyright enforcement when terrorists and criminals still roam the streets," said Gigi Sohn, president of the nonprofit fair-use advocacy group Public Knowledge. "When every dollar is being counted for education, health care and homeland security, it seems like a strange priority."

    Indeed, it's funny how certain industries always seem to get government help when they need it. Must be nice. "Lesse, my business is suffering because of competitors who won't play by my rules. I could try to out market them, or out produce them, or enforce my own rules, or, wait a minute! I know! I'll just cut a check to my congresscritter and get them to do my job for me! Whee! Ain't America grand!"

    Maybe that's why the article began this way:

    "Buried inside the massive $388 billion spending bill Congress approved last weekend is a program that creates a federal copyright enforcement czar. "

    Yeah, better not let this one see too much of the light of day. Just bury it in the spending bill that has to pass.

    1. Re:Government propping up private enterprise by Suidae · · Score: 1

      "Buried inside the massive $388 billion spending bill Congress approved last weekend is a program that creates a federal copyright enforcement czar. "

      Yeah, better not let this one see too much of the light of day. Just bury it in the spending bill that has to pass.


      This is why I think we need more computer technology in our government, so we can handle issues at a more granular level. Too much effort is spent in political manipulation to get unpopular stuff attached to bills that are sure to pass.

    2. Re:Government propping up private enterprise by ratamacue · · Score: 1
      it's funny how certain industries always seem to get government help when they need it

      Indeed. Most of these corporations are actually playing by the rules. The problem is that the rules are horribly broken.

      This is a failure of government, not free enterprise.

    3. Re:Government propping up private enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then there was this, which was fortunately caught. Makes you wonder what else is buried inside that bill. It could be a whole graveyard of bad ideas. It's not like anybody actually read it before they voted on it.

    4. Re:Government propping up private enterprise by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      One thing that needs to be understood is that the American entertainment industry is also the govt main propaganda machine. The govt needs this to insure that only authorized information is transmited. They both need each other. Its mutually parasitic, but in reality, we are the host from which both feed. The drones that are squealing about artists "rights" are missing the point and are distracting us from the real issue. It's about power and who has it.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:Government propping up private enterprise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Nothing new here. Note that none of those groups (education, public health care and homeland security) are members of the political donor class.

      Media corporations have the deep pockets needed to buy influence in congress. What we really need is an IRS Czar to fix tax laws that let corporations and the wealthy pay nothing while the middle class gets the squeeze.

      Read "Perfectly Legal" if you haven't yet. It's a great book to read if you care at all about where >25% of your paycheck goes.

  45. Lobby Money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is funny, but if we could scrape up enough money together, wouldn't it be fun to lobby for something stupid just to see congress spelled out as the greed-driven bottom feeders they are? Hrrm, what should we lobby for? Maybe make geeking a religion, and have all our computer parts become tax free and subsidizeable? That would be cool..

  46. Quick! by mogrify · · Score: 2, Funny

    Quick! Somebody patent the idea of government-enforced copyright protection!

    --
    perl -e 'foreach(values %SIG){$_="IGNORE";}while(){}'
    1. Re:Quick! by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe such a thing has prior art. But submit it to USPTO anyway and label it a business process and you'll probably get it.

    2. Re:Quick! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, go ahead. This time of year the weather's really nice in Guantanamo.

    3. Re:Quick! by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's easier than that. Just tack "with a computer" on to any existing process and viola. Almost instant patent and let the courts sort it out. The last business to survive in this world will be IP litigation.

      --
      What?
  47. Re:First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    seriously, this is bananas. what next?

    Patent application for plant-based cylindrical food product, tapered at the ends with slight curvature along length. Product employs ColorGrow(tm) technology which enables consumer to judge product age visually. Also incorporated natural and artifical flavor molecules to aid in ingestion and marketing.

  48. Welcome to the Plantation by plinius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For those of you who don't know, there REALLY IS an international conspiracy to limit people's freedoms. Globalization according to the WTO/IMF/WorldBank is not about giving cellphones to Eskimos, it's about preventing sick people from getting patented drugs at a penny less than the Corporations allows. Things get really scary when you look at GATS VI.4, which creates a non-democratic Panel that will have veto power of parliaments, the US Congress, everything. It's real and it's very, very bad -- unless you hate freedom.

    1. Re:Welcome to the Plantation by Sein · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You know, I really wish parent wasn't +5 insightful, but as far as I can tell, out of the above trio at least two are infected with rabid Randites.

    2. Re:Welcome to the Plantation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to denounce what you don't understand.

  49. IP Czar or P2P Czar-Information economy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now stop that! :>

    Don't you know we never RTFAs.

    We make wild ass rants, and prefix all our posts with, IANAL but...

    Seriously people shouldn't be surprised about the emphasise on IP. We're an "information economy" now. Alan Toffler and others predicted this. Of course people who have forgotten history. Should remember we had "protections" when we were a more industrial society. People bitched about those too.

  50. too early in the morning by trb · · Score: 1

    I just read the headline as: Your Rights Online: U.S. to Get New ZIP Car. Oh, that's nice. I need more sleep.

  51. Scariest. Title. Ever. by The_Real_Nire · · Score: 1

    Can't they pick a more friendly, inviting title than the Cold-War-Era-feel inducing title of Czar?

    It's very frightening to me personally.

    1. Re:Scariest. Title. Ever. by automag · · Score: 1

      Copyright Gnome? The Fairy Godmother of of Copyright? Dr. Evil? Maybe we should just call him... Shaft.

      --
      ---As my daddy used to tell me: "You gotta be smart before you can be a smartass."
  52. WIPO? by isa-kuruption · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I guess this is a national version of WIPO? Would NIPLAC deal directly with WIPO?

    I work for a company that has been attempting to "clean up" some fraudulent sites who use our copyrighted name to spam and sell "vi\[ag)(ra" and "c[]el3br1x" via email, www popups, etc. We, as a company, have delt with WIPO on many occasions since it seems a lot of the domain owners are in Asian nations (like China). Our efforts have been mediocre at best (it's been 6 months of chasing registrars and new registered owners to just live up to the WIPO ruling).

    Anyway, I wonder if we could use the gov't power of NIPLAC to assist us in obtaining these domain names. That would definately assist us in dealing with ICANN and their "approved" registrars, at the very least.

    1. Re:WIPO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your site: "He who dies with the most toys.... WINS!"

      What does he win?

  53. Mod Parent Up by mykepredko · · Score: 1

    I would think the *AA lobby would appreciate this - they are no longer the bad guys for suing grandparents because of what gets put on their machines during weekend visits and they have someone to complain about when U2's new album shows up as MP3s before the master is cut.

    myke

  54. What after petrol a war on IP? by jamiguet · · Score: 1

    Is this the embrio of what would be required to invade China?

    Looks sacry if you start policying internationally about ideas too. Not that it is any good doing on petrol like the US is doing in Nigeria, Afganistan and Iraq.

    What a world.

    --

    Where is my mind?

  55. I forgot by ravenspear · · Score: 1

    to add corporate catering, innovation retarding, *IAA enforcing, common law redefining, content restricting, product shilling, obsessively litigating, objectivity abandoning, livestock fucking, (well ok maybe not that last one).

  56. Over seas or in America? by blanks · · Score: 1

    What do you think will be their primary focus, trying to enforce existing corporations IP like the RIAA.

    Or will they make an attempt to get some type of process here in america working with filing.

  57. Nothing better to do by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    its nice to know that all the terrorists have been eradicated so they are no longer a concern.

    Its nice to know that there are no more starving children in the country, or neglected. or abused.

    All other *real* crime has been removed from our land.. so now we can waste resources on meaningless things like this.. and have the feds invade farther into our lives, what should be civil issues?

    Don't we all just feel so much safer now?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  58. I do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "who here thinks that its a good thing that you can buy "Oceans 12" or "Half Life 2" on the streets of Hong Kong today for 50 cents?"

    Piracy is the only check we have on the price of games, movies, and CD's.

    CD prices have dropped recently. Why? Because the competition (i.e. "free") forced it down.

    There is a myth that if there was perfect copy protection, prices would decrease because of "less losses from piracy".

    In fact, prices go up in this situation, because there is no competition.

    I view a small amount of piracy as a healthy thing for the consumer, because it forces the producer to compete with *something*.

  59. Just say no to "Czars" by pherris · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Look at the position of "Drug Czar" and picture the same tactics used for IP enforcement: prison and "rehabilitation". How about if you violate an IP law you lose the ability to get a federally backed college student loan.

    The private prison industry is growing and to sustain that growth they need fresh meat. Any guesses who's on the menu?

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
    1. Re:Just say no to "Czars" by automag · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the question is... which state are we going to house 'em in? I mean literally- which state are we going to have to kick all the citizens out of in order to be able to hold every lawbreaker...

      --
      ---As my daddy used to tell me: "You gotta be smart before you can be a smartass."
  60. How to gather the evidence by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    Back in the day, it was pretty easy to spot couterfeit computer software. You could take one look at the floppy disk in question, check the label, and examine the disk contents.

    These days, the internet has made most removable media redundant, and strong encryption is commonplace. Somebody could simply load all their illegal software onto an encrypted drive and a search by an unauthorized user would turn up absolutely nothing.

    In these cases, gathering evidence of IP infringement will become pretty useless pretty quick. The only way to gain evidence would be via networks, and even then that is fraught with possible errors.

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  61. 2 million is a joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sorry but this is chump change. They must have wanted to create the token appearance of funding something.

  62. Czar, as you should remeber from history class, is russian for Ceasar. Ceasar, as you should remember from lunch, is a salad. So, like the drug and IP Czars are just like leafy green vegitables coated in a mixture of vinagar and oil. I might be afraid of soft furry kittens that rub agianst my leg, but I couldn't be afraid of something so weak and pittiful as romaine lettuce.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  63. Oversee enforcement. by ahfoo · · Score: 1

    This is an interesting and amusing way to put it. It's trivial to create treaties and even push though laws in other countries, but when it comes to enforcement it's like pushing a freight train up a hill with a well cooked spaghetti noodle. It's not that you didn't find the train that needs to go up the hill or that you didn't get your noodle ready. The problem is, that noodle will not push the train.
    The trick here is that the assumption that you can force other countries to enforce so-called IP laws as they are enforced in the US is to assume that other countries already have similar law enforcement systems in other respect, ie, outside of this fig newton of the imagination called IP, and that assumption is an outrageous leap into fantasy.
    So, "overseeing" is a nice way to put it. This new tax payer funded office will be very busy "overseeing" the enforcement, and the lack of it as well.
    I can hear the Czar already.
    "Yep, I can see a long ways from this office. Hell of a view."

  64. One czar to rule them all... by gmuslera · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... is a single point of failure, one that can be bribed, could not be objective, could follow the pressures of RIAA/MPAA/etc instead of what is fair/freedom of speech/logic/etc, and will validate whatever atrocity is done in that matter ("the czar said so, bow and agree, or else.."). Even worse, will enforce the madness involved in IP/patents? where i can patent i.e. "thinking"?

    In the other hand, "international copyright infringements"... what about US infringements about international copyrights? US laws/view of the problem always seems to be "i am the right one, the other countries just copy what is done here" even when its not, same with the "fair trade" US definition (accept our products, lets see if I accept yours)

  65. Czar? by NiceGuyUK · · Score: 1

    I say bring back McCarthyism - anyone calling themselves a Czar is obviously a Commie spy and needs to be removed from the US

  66. TSOG by mazarin5 · · Score: 1
    Fight the Tsarist Occupation Government by supporting the Guns and Dope Party.

    Fnord.

    --
    Fnord.
  67. IP Czar? by nwbvt · · Score: 1

    Would it be too much trouble to think of a better name? We went through this when the 9-11 report called for a "Intelligence Czar", naming a government position after a line of Russian monarchs is not the best public relations move one can make.

    --
    Mathematics is made of 50 percent formulas, 50 percent proofs, and 50 percent imagination.
  68. Don't blame me - I voted for Bush! by Handbrewer · · Score: 1

    And he said, he was going to protect me. I trust this is to protect me from the terrorists getting money to buy WMDs from piracy. Why are you people whining? You're all terrorists, im calling Departement of Homeland security, damn commies. And in other news, Slashdot editors were hauled away by the DHS this morning for alleged conspiracy to commit "insert political FUDword"... More news at 11.

  69. Re:What the fuck is this 'CZAR' BS? by Le+Marteau · · Score: 1

    The ceasar of Rome ruled a republic (most of the time).

    Indeed. Then came the fall of the republic. The average citizen still thought he was still living in a republic, when in fact, the fix was in. The purportedly free country was in fact an empire, ruled by the Caesars, but the poor schmuck citizens still went about thinking they were living in a republic.

    --
    Mod down people who tell people how to mod in their sigs
  70. Hoping about the GOP? by GaelenBurns · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Having the GOP control the entire government is bad on so many levels - and one of the worst is the constant shilling they do for corporations at the expense of individuals. The normality of our nerd lives is continually threatened by the Republican party.

    1. Re:Hoping about the GOP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new GOP is willing to reach out and meet the needs of the people - the old conservative mantra of "private risk for private profit" has been replaced with the neo-con slogan "socialized risk for private profit".

    2. Re:Hoping about the GOP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which Pres signed the DMCA? A Democrat.

      Who proposed the SSSCA? A Democrat.

      Both sides are guilty here.

    3. Re:Hoping about the GOP? by Trizor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More like the entire political system. Corporations have gotten so close to politicians that the interest conflict is worse than the Cold War. We need to separate corporation and state, and church and state, because religion is weeding its way back in.

  71. National overseas....errr by LabRat404 · · Score: 0

    so...bsically, National Intellectual Property Law Enforcement Coordination Council is going to enforce this law in other countries as well? can you say "what the fcuk?"

    --
    1001100 1100101 1100001 1110110 1100101 1001101 1111001 1000010 1101001 1110100 1110011 1000001 1101100 1101111 110111
  72. Umbrella Corporation? by shuz · · Score: 1

    After a recent trip to the theater I am a bit skeptical and a bit scare about any corporation or goverment agency with the word umbrella in it.

    --
    There is or can be built a machine that can simulate any physical object. -Church-Turing principle
  73. Czar = by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ceasar

  74. Thought police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So if intelectual property is our ideas or thoughts, is this a national thought police agency?

  75. "middel ground"? Not from The Shrub by doublem · · Score: 1

    And is he going to work toward finding a middle ground between fair use and IP protection?

    "Middle Ground" is a firing offense in the Bush administration.

    We'll see swat teams take out MP3 swappers Branch Dividian style in a couple months, just wait and see.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  76. Whoever has the biggest lobbyist wins. by gelfling · · Score: 0, Troll

    This is a good example of the political reality that if you have a big enough lobbyist you can actually get a branch of government creates to benefit you and only you.

    Usually in George Bush's America if you have an industry that needs some money you go invade a country and hire that country to administer the post hillarity era. But in the case of movies and music, we can't actually force people to listen or watch it at gunpoint, yet. So we have to create a special branch of the Federal government, like the FCC for example which is specifically dedicated to insuring that you use the approved products and only the approved products and services.

    1. Re:Whoever has the biggest lobbyist wins. by gelfling · · Score: 1

      ok laugh it up and mod me down. Pretty soon /. will be illegal.

  77. In.. by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia the Bolsheviks overthrow Czar!

  78. whoa Whoa WHOA by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 1
    The gov't provided patents for protection, but in exchange they made it clear that enforcement was the jurisdiction of the patent holder. It was the owner's problem to identify infringers and drag them into court. The only resource the gov't provided was the court system, not law enforcement. It was counterproductive to use taxpayer funded law enforcement to enforce a government granted monopoly.

    This was the same with trademarks and copyrights.

    Coupled with the Sonny Bono copyright extension act, this should NEVER have been passed. Now we have taxpayer $$$ being used to enforce near-perpetual copyrights. This is WRONG and violates the spirit of the original copyright drafters.

    Copyright are entertainment tools, people. There is no public threat to copyright infringement. They pose no threat to the economy, to defense, to public utility infrastructure, or to domestic security. Entertainment is not an economic cornerstone like banking, transportation, farming, and raw goods.

    I can't believe this provision evaded the radar of gov't watchdog groups.

    --
    Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
  79. Geeks and Conservatives unite on P2P by Nohea · · Score: 2, Informative

    Criminal Penalties Suggested in S. 2560 are Anti-Consumer and Set Dangerous Precedent, Says ACU

    http://www.conservative.org/pressroom/040920.asp

  80. Can't we return to the good old days? by squarooticus · · Score: 1

    When the taxpayers weren't forced to pay for having their own rights trampled? When copyright holders were required to take pirates to court at their own expense and prove damages before a judge or jury?

    --
    [ home ]
    1. Re:Can't we return to the good old days? by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      Blame Lincoln

  81. Plethora of Czars by discordare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thirty years ago or more Nixon appointed an Energy Czar to make us more energy independent. Since then we're ever more dependent on the Saudis & their ilk.

    Every administration since at least Reagan has appointed a Drug Czar. He has had absolutely no effect on the availability of drugs in this country.

    Before creating the Department of Homeland Insecurity, Bush appointed Tom Ridge to be his Homeland Security Czar. Far from making everyone feel more secure, he's spent the last three years or so scaring the bejezus out of us.

    So now that we're going to have an IP Czar, file traders everywhere should be breathing a sigh of relief. It means the government isn't really serious about the "problem" and is just going through the motions.

    1. Re:Plethora of Czars by jalefkowit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There is more truth to this than you know.

      I've come to the conclusion that the primary function of these types of "Czars" is to do one thing -- generate B-roll. Actually solving energy/drug/homeland security/IP/etc. problems is beside the point.

      For those of you lucky enough to not have to deal with media on a regular basis, here's what I mean. When the TV types do a story on a subject, they typically build it by combining a tiny amount of actual news footage -- i.e. footage of something important happening -- with a larger amount of stock footage of people, places, and things that are related to the event in question.

      Example -- if you're watching a story about a bill passing Congress, there will usually be a part where you hear the reporter talking while you see a visual of the Capitol Building looking pretty in the springtime.

      That visual is "B-roll" -- stock footage that they can use over and over again, any time they need to do a story on a particular subject.

      So what does this have to do with Czars? Well, think about it. If a problem rises to a high enough level of prominence that the Executive Branch is supposed to start paying attention to it, the TV people are going to need some B-roll -- some visual shorthand -- to indicate that. And many times they're going to use footage of the President getting off a helicopter, walking across the White House lawn, etc. as that B-roll, while the reporter's voice-over explains that "the Department of Justice announced today that heroin claimed the lives of 500 more ghetto children last year..."

      No President wants his image associated with stuff like that -- it's bad media. So he appoints a "Czar". Now the TV types have new instant visual shorthand they can use, instead of the President. So now when they're looking for B-roll to put under narration like "Maps of secret U.S. nuclear facilities were found today in an Afghan cave", they can just reach for the footage of Tom Ridge looking constipated at the podium. And now people associate Tom Ridge with bad news about bearded killers, and not the President.

    2. Re:Plethora of Czars by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Every administration since at least Reagan has appointed a Drug Czar. He has had absolutely no effect on the availability of drugs in this country.

      Not true. The price of coke went from over $300usd down to less than $100usd a gram. It has never been easier to get. I beleive this was intentional. It's not just for doctors and lawyers anymore. There are times when I can't find a package of Twinkies at the store, but coke is available on every corner(let me exaggerate, will ya?) all day every day. They did put a dent into the weed business with their reefer madness campaign of the 80's.

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Plethora of Czars by Tom_Yardley · · Score: 1

      Am I the only guy scared when the goverment wants a Ceaser / Kaiser / Tzar / Czar? When reading history it seems the only thing the Czar was any good at was killing jews. Is that the answer to ip issues, Pograms? Do words matter any more?

  82. war on terra = war on earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah. that sounds about right.

  83. Here they come... by Kid+Zero · · Score: 1

    Nice to know the Stormtroopers are finally coming. Lord knows we can't have all those evil Movie thieves running loose. I guess Bush thinks that's better than funding... Heck, anything else.

  84. Very sad news. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    Corporate money in the federal government is a major problem. It enables huge corporations to extend their money grubbing wishes into federal law. This is a major conflict of interest and borders on corruption, but I'm sure the first thing they did was lobby the government to declare that this is not corruption.

    When a corporation is able to use its money to lobby the federal government to enact a law which in turn forces taxpayers to foot the bill for a corporate wish, something is seriously wrong.

    Can you imagine how much more pure government would be if lobbyist money was kept out of the politicians' hands?

  85. GPL = IP by konijn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So will this federal copyright enforcement czar work to enforce the GPL as well?

    Or is US made Free Software not considered "American IP"?

  86. How crazy can it get? by MadMoses · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, a federal copyright enforcement czar from the US watches you!

    --

    Do not be alarmed. This is only a test.
  87. Don't forget the rebranding! by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    If they're going to be protecting US IP abroad, they probably want a name which doesn't make it sound as though their focus is entirely domestic. Two million in any currency is cheap for an organisational renaming nowadays.

  88. Copyrighted name?! by pjt33 · · Score: 1
    our copyrighted name
    Presumably you mean trademark?
  89. Czar czars by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1
    Drug Czars, IP Czars, what next?

    Czar czars. So many czars, somebody's gotta keep track.

    (They're going to hire a guy named Binks...)

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  90. Re:What the fuck is this 'CZAR' BS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm.. "then came the Fall of the Republic.." which was actually 400 years later not the next day. The Caesars vastly increased the territory of the Empire, its wealth and maintained order 2x the time the entire US has existed.

  91. Much like the Drug Czar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This new person will highly ineffective against the top level professionals making money from it and will make the average person's life a lot more hazzardous annoying and expensive.

  92. You can't say that! by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    By saying jumped the shark I think you have mis-appropriated someone else's IP.

    Or at least mentioned an act that is indecent in most southern states.

    Either way, by posting it online, you are in deep trouble!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:You can't say that! by finkployd · · Score: 1

      Or at least mentioned an act that is indecent in most southern states.

      Nice visual. Perhaps the next step after "jumping the shark" and continuing on should be called "raping the shark" :)

      Finkployd

  93. Why is it that we can send a Nigger to the Moon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but can't put an Astronaut through college?
    You fuckers and your "priorities".

  94. Historical note by Lifewish · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Read some Machiavelli. Wars have historically almost always been seen in economical and political terms. At the moment, the US is powerful enough and self-confident enough not to worry about the political, hence the economic factors will tend to take precedence.

    --
    For the love of God, please learn to spell "ridiculous"!!!
    1. Re:Historical note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oil

  95. What the? by helmespc · · Score: 1

    With a half trillian dollars in deficit... where are they getting this "money?"

  96. Is there an 'Event Horizon'... by mutterc · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ... past which power will inexorably slide away from the people towards the corporations? Has it already been passed?

    If so, then everything we try to do to get consumer-friendly laws pass will be thwarted, and all we will be able to do is to watch as current trends move towards their logical conclusion, where there's a small number of ultra-rich corps/people, and the rest of the world lives like Bangladeshi farmers do today.

    Have a pleasant holiday!

    1. Re:Is there an 'Event Horizon'... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      ... past which power will inexorably slide away from the people towards the corporations? Has it already been passed?

      Possibly, but things have been worse than this before. The monopolists of the early 20th century USA were far worse than today's breed, and you're probably aware of the bloody awful lot the workers had in 19th century Britain.

      The great problem right now is that the corporations are beginning to surpass the governments in power. There are only a few countries in the world that are much wealthier than the largest corporations, and since they're mostly democracies that means that their leaders can be easily bought. If you have a single socialist bone in your body then this is a nightmare - the government, representative of the workers, should protect our rights from the capitalist barons, but they're selling us out. It's beginning to look almost like feudalism.

      But as I said, we've seen worse before and come back from it. We probably need the left to get over the fall of the USSR and develop a post-Marxist philosophy; perhaps left-wing libertarianism along the Dutch model. Unfortunately, for socialism of any kind to have a fighting chance would probably need a really serious recession to damage the credibility of the ultra-capitalist model; this would be No Fun At All.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Is there an 'Event Horizon'... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes Virginia, it's been there for some time now, along with law and tax reform. Maybe Ralph Nader knew this.

      However, China is not buying it, whacking down unworthy copyright style patents, and doing the right thing, and ignoring shameless mass consumer transgressions.

      It will never allow legal fine print to shut down factories and the engine rooms that drive its economy. If the US wants to use oil, as a driver for fine print enforcement, that is unlikely to work.

    3. Re:Is there an 'Event Horizon'... by mutterc · · Score: 1

      That's the scary part - the easily bought leaders. That means, even if / when people wake up, it might be after they have little enough voice in the government that it doesn't matter.

  97. big deal-Selective Ignorance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Im sure the war on CopyrightAbuse will be as affective as the War on Drugs and the The War on Terra."

    Apparently the War on Ignorance goes up their too.

  98. Not a good feeling about this...Diarrhea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And is he going to work toward finding a middle ground between fair use and IP protection? I have my doubts."

    Uh huh. Explain to me what your job is, citizen?

  99. i must be missing something obvious by 4-D4Y · · Score: 1

    but don't the states have 55E12$ to pay off already?

    since when does a couple mil not matter?

    oh wait, lame duck session and president. my mistake.

    --
    A-Day
  100. I for one welcome etc... by JonToycrafter · · Score: 1

    And just to show that there's no hard feelings between the /. crowd and the IP czar, I think we should chip in and buy him a brand-new cellphone...

  101. Imagine!-A world without crimminals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Its comforting to know that a government agency will be responsible for ensuring the MPAA and RIAA are profitable."

    As a small time artist, it 's comforting to know I have legal recourse against those who have zero respect for copyright, or me. But then no one ever mentions that aspect, and thinks it's all about big business. Dehumanizing one's "enemy" is always the first step to justification of one's actions.

    "And we get to pay for it both on the enforcement ..."

    Blame the victim.

    Crimminals don't have any effect on society. That's why you don't needs pins and passwords. You don't need locks on doors and windows. You don't need to pass through metal detectors, and body searches. Your checks aren't written on safety paper, and legal documents watermarked. Your insurance rates are at an absolute lowest because no one speeds, or drives drunk. Your goods and services are at their cheapest because people don't do five-fingered discounts, or "scams". People don't fill up and drive away without paying. People don't submit false claims to their insurance. Perfectly healthy people don't lie in order to get welfare benifits. Identities don't get swipped, and we all don't have to clean up the resulting mess.

    People are absolutely upright, and honest, and all the bad consequences are the victims fault.

    "...and higher prices caused by inefficient distribution systems."

    Appaerntly it's so "inefficient" that it's keeping them from making money, and you from getting goods and services.*

    *Make note audiance. The implied "efficient distribution system" is always electronic in nature e.g. Internet. Now who here knows about the real world and can tell me why this will only work for a small portion of the total music, and movie buying public. Anyone? Maybe the guys over at Fark know, because no one here with their "better distribution systems" do [1].

    [1] Here's an idea. How about you all become "artists"? You suddenly become even more "efficient" because you're doing all the work, instead of someone else. How about that for eliminating the middle man between consumer and entertainment the world owes me? You even get to keep the money you're too tight-fisted to exchange for goods amd services.

    1. Re:Imagine!-A world without crimminals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As a small time artist, it 's comforting to know I have legal recourse against those who have zero respect for copyright, or me."

      Puhleeese. If someone rips you off on Ebay for $100, I invite you to go to a federal agency for relief. Hell, pick the FBI, since its interstate commerce. They won't even bother to laugh.

      The purpose of this agency is to help big businesses. Period.

      "But then no one ever mentions that aspect"

      Well, no. But then they never mention santa claus or the easter bunny either. Why is that?

      "Blame the victim."

      Its your creative work. Why do I have to pay to enforce your copyright?

      "People are absolutely upright, and honest, and all the bad consequences are the victims fault."

      Careful. If you put too much straw in one place, you could start a fire.

      "Appaerntly it's so "inefficient" that it's keeping them from making money, and you from getting goods and services.*"

      Ahhh...so your "art" is now a good and/or service. How convenient. Earlier you claimed it was intellectual property. When that line of reasoning proved nonsense, then you call it a good/service.

      "How about you all become "artists"?"

      We're right behind you. In the meantime, I don't care to pay taxes to make sure your quaint notion of how your art should guarantee you an income is fulfilled. I don't care to pay tax money to make sure that Vivendi/Sony et al get all their entitled to.

      As for you, get a real job and stop pretending to be an artists. I just got a call from a real artists and he just laughed at you. Out loud.

  102. Wow, this is great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a great idea.

    Too bad they can't catch /bin/Laden in the act of downloading a movie or something...

  103. Exactly by DavidTC · · Score: 1

    The law, in its majestic equality, forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets or steal bread.
    -Anatole France

    --
    If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  104. I do-Invertebrate consumers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Piracy is the only check we have on the price of games, movies, and CD's."

    No it isn't. You can start your own companies to fulfil demand. Pure lazyness on consumer (and citizens) part is what's keeping that competition from appearing. Oh wait, it is appearing from people who've done just that. Guess some people do put their money were their mouth is. The rest just make hollow excuses.

  105. Actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "hey, it works for Amtrak and the Big Three Airlines"

    Amtrak was never a corporation in the sense that United or IBM was a corporation.

    The Federal Government helped created Amtrak to make sure there was infrastructure in place for passenger rail. As such, the business was set up without regard to a mission, or even how to make money.

    Its kind of late to complain about it.

    The proper debate is whether we should have passenger rail and what form it should take, not "ooh, Amtrak is failed". Well, as a business yes, but it has accomlished what the feds wanted it to.

    Besides, we've poured half a trillion into Iraq to destroy it. Seems a bit cheap not to spend some money to pay for useless infrastructure at home...

  106. The US virtual economy by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Much manufacturing is already outsourced. More software engineering is getting outsourced. What will be the most important thing that America contributes to the world market in the not-too-distant future?

    Distribution rights for copyrighted media and patent licenses!

    So all it will take for the US economy to collapse is basically the rest of the world deciding not to honor US IP. What a great thing it is to base our economy on.

    So the US just has to enforce their IP rights... I guess that's why we spend 15% of our budget on the military. At least it's less than what we spend on the Treasury department (presumably mostly on interest payments on the national debt)

    Numbers: (from a few years back, I ought to update this)
    http://hairball.bumba.net/~rwa2/misc/USbudg et/hist /US_Historical_budget,_1962_-_2008.html

  107. A Tsar? by jazman_777 · · Score: 1

    What has a republic of free citizens got to do with all these Tsars? It's authoritarian, I tell you.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  108. Hello - Big Charade. by Foktip · · Score: 0

    Exactly - this is just a front to appease/fool large companies, and also to send some sort of message to the "Public". Nothing more. Its like the Jedi Mind Trick, except it only works on idiots. That kind of funding just doesnt warrant any "Real" progress - i mean, were talking about a governmental Entity here, those things are notorious guzzlers. They'll probably spend most of their money on "American" office supplies and non-pirated, high cost software. LOL.

  109. not funny by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you realize that we are currently in a situation with Russia? Your comments are harmful and will be viewed world wide.

    The United States will never invade Russia.

    Though we did send 'trainers' their during WWI.

    1. Re:not funny by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Do you realize that the US has been in a "situation" with Russia for centuries? And that free people can make any comments we please? For sanity's sake, Anonymous Coward, keep your primitive fascist repression urges under control. If Bush has screwed up our "situation" with Russia to the extent that my sarcastic Slashdot post can affect it negatively, we're all doomed. I wouldn't be surprised, but I won't be spending my final days walking around silent, scared and towing the Bush line. Get a life, Anonymous coward Coward.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  110. I bet M$ instigated and paid into this IP crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so that fat fuck Steve Ballmer can go around Far East and bully small countries into using Winblows over Linux, which violates M$'s IP rights.

    God Blesh Amerika

  111. the next czar appointed... by ilduce · · Score: 1

    Since Congress likes to appoint a czar for every type of crime I propose that the next czar be the Loitering Czar. Included in his jurisdiction would be simple loitering, cruising, skateboarding in public places, being black, ringing bells, "hanging out" (either literally or figuratively), being poor, and we can through in J-walking, since of course all loiterers facilitate their heinous crimes by first j-walking over to their intended loitering spot.

  112. same as it ever was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't feel outraged over something that was inevitable.

    Did you fools think that you could eat the music and movie mafia's lunch and they were going to let you?

    I read 'international' not 'domestic' in that law. So does this new czar have any domestic law enforcement capability?

    Do you really think that the groups that should have been doing this stuff (the FBI) will let this get by? It will slice their budget.

    Most in government are not the 'evil facist' that so many who post on the net these days seem to want to have be real. They are just people who want to go home and have dinner at the end of the day.

    Stop stealing movies and you won't need to worry.

  113. Finally-People Action Committees. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Until all the political donations by artificial entities are eliminated, things are going to get a lot worse."

    And then they will be replaced by individual political donations. Oh much better.

  114. Do you realize how paranoid you sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt that they will do what you say to Chinese or Indian nerds.

    1. Re:Do you realize how paranoid you sound? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not appropriate for red-blooded American boys and girls to become Nerds. We need to let our nerdy-class wear-off on the Foreign Devil$-er-hmm 'workers', so our young folk can pursue a life of executive compensation, sports, bible school, doe hunting, and country-club living - more upstanding, wholesome and enlightening than all that scientific mumbo-jumbo...

  115. "Of the corporations, by the corporations..." by Atario · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You hit the nail on the head. "Of the people, by the people, for the people" became "of the corporations, by the corporations, for the corporations" bit by bit as corporate personhood became the norm in the US. Since corporations are immortal and made of the labor of many people, however, they have a distinct advantage over the rest of us poor slobs.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:"Of the corporations, by the corporations..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. This government enforcement of copyright seems to be a new phenomenon, traditionally it was a civil matter. However I'm sure they will only be interested in helping corporations, and the chance of an individual copyright holder getting help with enforcement is not very high.

  116. Howsabout a freaking Fair Use Czar? by Disco+Stu · · Score: 1

    Or a Giant Corporations that Get Unconsitutional Laws Passed in Order to Sheild Themselves from Copmpetition Czar? We can dream...

  117. ok., who do we have to kill to prevent this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm ready for the revolution.

  118. If and IP Czar existed in... by robyannetta · · Score: 1
    ...the late 1800's, there would be only one brand of cars (and no innovation).
    ...the late 1800's, the only movies being made would be from the Thomas Edison movie studio on the east coast. Hollywood wouldn't exist.
    ...the early 1900's, there would be only one phone company.

    I can keep going, but I'm making a list. Maybe I'm violating David Letterman's IP.

    See how STUPID IP laws are?

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  119. NIPLAC??? by ChuckSchwab · · Score: 0

    What a stupic acronym. It's like it's short for Nipple Lactate.

  120. Scared Congress??? by ChuckSchwab · · Score: 0

    Are you trying to imply that the RIAA is somehow not justified in its claims that downloaders on p2p services are hurting them? Let me explain the simple math for you: if you have a choice between "paying" and "not paying" for music, which will you do? Hm. That's a tough one. So obviously, OBVIOUSLY, it's going to hurt musicians when people can download. So yess, the RIAA has 100% legit claims of financial ruin.

    1. Re:Scared Congress??? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Are you trying to imply that the RIAA is somehow not justified in its claims that downloaders on p2p services are hurting them?

      I'll imply it. In fact, I'll come right out and say it: The RIAA is not justified in its claims that downloaders on p2p services are hurting them. Primarily this is because their claims are overblown and are used by RIAA as the SOLE culprit in their revenue loss, when in fact it is only a small portion of the blame.

      Let me explain the simple math for you: if you have a choice between "paying" and "not paying" for music, which will you do? Speak for yourself. Since you seem to have no regard for the law, I suppose you will do anything you can get away with. Personally, I don't care for the crap the RIAA label put out these days, and I don't buy it, and I don't listen to it (other than occasionally on radio and tv, or at a bar - I do have friends and family).

      Artists (even bad ones) should have some way of being compensated, if that's what they care about. But the RIAA model of stealing from artists, controlling the broadcasters, and ripping off the public is old and dying and deserves no respect. And using the government to protect their dying business model is plain evil.

      So yess[sic], the RIAA has 100% legit claims of financial ruin.

      So, along with the airline industry, the auto industry, etc., etc., I suppose you think it's ok for MY tax dollars to be stolen from me (at gunpoint) to bail out the music industry? Well, then, fuck you.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
  121. So when do we get... by RKBA · · Score: 1
    So now we have a copyright enforcement czar as well as a "drug war" czar. Should I get worried when they start calling themselves Führers?

  122. Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I couldn't have thought of a better way to wreck the U.S. economy... help the big ones crush the small ones.

    I wander how long the U.S. economy will last with this in place.

  123. I love the name of the new agency that's going to by multiplexo · · Score: 1
    enforce IP, NIPLAC. OK, I'm going to have a hard time taking anyone from an agency called "NIPLAC" seriously even if they are carrying a gun and have a shiny badge.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  124. How about a peoples rights czar? by msimm · · Score: 1

    I know thats flip, but they're not even trying to hide it anymore. And all this has a cost you and your family pays. If I was a corporation you can bet I'd be making damn sure this czar was on my dinner list.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  125. You don't want the rich to go without, do you? by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So, along with the airline industry, the auto industry, etc., etc., I suppose you think it's ok for MY tax dollars to be stolen from me (at gunpoint) to bail out the music industry? Well, then, fuck you.
    You raise in your good post an important point about fairness in America: life is unfair for the majority, but it always must be made fair for our masters.

    In practice, this plays out through the operation of two seemingly diametrical systems. The laissez-faire economy is operated for the poor and working classes, who must either sink or swim, while a kind of socialism is provided for the rich. They are entitled to sink all they like. Their political servants--the US government--will always be on hand at poolside to revive them, pump their waterlogged bellies, and towel down the poor dears while delivering fulsome praise for their bravery and daring in plunging to the bottom.

  126. The Real Pirates / The Scapegoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It frustrates me to see people who *share* content getting more persecuted/prosecuted than those who try to profit from stolen content - the real pirates.

    The real pirates operate out of places like Taiwan, China, Hong Kong, and Russia where copyright is nothing more than a 9-letter word. These are countries that are notorious for not enforcing copyrights as well as not being within the jurisdiction of the United States Of America. The real pirates are laughing all the way to the bank. The copyright infringers are mostly in America and are subject to its laws--hence a 12-year old child is sued for copyright infringement. Being a minor, their parents are legally held responsible in the suit and are given the choice of bankrupcy by going to trial or settling out of court for a stiff penalty.

    This is all absurd and truly shows that Money Talks and nothing else matters.

    By comparison, If the 12-year-old had committed some heinous crime--like kill someone--they'd probably be detained until they became an adult and then let go. I guess the rationale is, you can always replace dead people through procreation so why bother crushing defendants with steep, steep fines?