Slashdot Mirror


Sprint Close to Buying Nextel

NateDawg writes "After the recent merger of AT&T and Cingular, it looks like Sprint is close to buying out Nextel. According to CNet, the different networks could bring expensive problems, but that could be overcome by the diversity of the company's clients. Nextel has many corporate clients, while Sprint appeals to families and teens."

256 comments

  1. I don't know how it is in the rest of the world... by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...but here (Argentina), Nextel offers the best mobile comunications solution, bar none. Yes, it can be expensive, but it's worth it - i have friends who work with their celular & sattelite network and have nothing but praise for the service.

    Things always tend to change after a company is bought; i hope they stay doing good.

  2. We'll see ... by nbvb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We'll see how this goes.

    If you think Cingular/ATT is a bloodbath, wait till you see this one.

    Divergent technologies, different networks, and completely different corporate philosophies.

    Nextel caters to the business user (not typically the white-collar CEO types, but more of the blue-collar type) and it's great for that.

    Sprint basically picks up the leftovers that VZW & Cingular don't want (those with iffy credit ratings ...)

    Yeah, good luck. Match made in heaven, really.

    1. Re:We'll see ... by cyberise · · Score: 1

      They don't necessarily need to go under one name. Sprint can simply keep the Nextel name and let them run along the same course that the company has done so far. In addition they can now utilize any technologies Nextel may have had to further improve upon their own Sprint network.

    2. Re:We'll see ... by nbvb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      iDEN (Nextel) and CDMA2000 (sprint) are about as functionally different as it's going to get.

      If they want to act as one, they'll have to pick a technology and run with it.

      This merger is just a me-too because of Cingular/ATT ...

    3. Re:We'll see ... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1
      Nextel caters to anybody who's actually trying to get work done. Those people aren't often in management. And Nextel's offerings are very good, though you do pay for it.

      Sprint will take anybody. Of course, their "pay up front for the phone" approach generally keeps the worst non-payers away.

      I've used both services, and they're definitely for different people and different circumstances. If Sprint pulls off this merger, they're going to be able to offer something to everyone. Whether they completely screw it up remains to be seen.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    4. Re:We'll see ... by krbvroc1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nextel caters to anybody who's actually trying to get work done

      Nextel caters to self absorbed individuals who think 'getting their work done' is so importatnt that they can walkie talkie their converstation anywhere and everywhere. Blasting their two-way conversation to everyone in the area. Even when they are driving alone, you'll pass them as they drive 10 miles under the speed limit in the fast lane hunchbacked over the steering wheel conversing with their Nextel walkie-talkie. I put Nextel users who behave this wasy one step above SPAMMERS and smokers.

    5. Re:We'll see ... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I chose Sprint because they have the best reception in my area. ATT, Verizon, Nextel all had worse connectivity in general, in my area. I guess there are other players, I don't pay attention.

      And I hate Nextel for the push to talk feature. The connect / disconnect beeps for EVERY little statement drives me nuts from across the room. I also don't need to hear one side of the conversation, never mind both. This seems to cater to people that can't have a normal conversation, and to those that crank up the volume so much that the speaker distorts madly.

      Sprint will take anybody. Of course, their "pay up front for the phone" approach generally keeps the worst non-payers away.

      My phone was free after rebate. You could buy more expensive phones, but I chose to buy the best free phone.

      I hate the $150 break-contract fee, but it seems everyone has that.

    6. Re:We'll see ... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      Well, this could torpedo my company. We provide oursourced (no, not offshore) billing and customer care operations for wireless carriers. We are in the process of losing AT&T to competitors that serve Cingular, and now we will probably lose Sprint.

      Time to dust off the resume again.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    7. Re:We'll see ... by hendridm · · Score: 1

      Although I agree with you on Nextel, I think you're wrong about Sprint. I've been a Sprint customer for about 4 years, and have always contemplated switching because of the price, but then I hear my friends with other providers bitching about this and that, and I think to myself, "Cool, I've never had that problem."

      Sprint is expensive, but it's worth it. Like a Macintosh. The quality, features, and reliability are top notch. Customer service has been poor, but I doubt it's any worse than the other providers (hell, it's still better than when I was with Cellular One *cringe*).

      Lovin' the nationwide LD and unlimited night minutes after 7pm. I'm going to go give plasma now so I can afford my shared plan...

    8. Re:We'll see ... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a minority of users. I've used Nextels at two jobs now, and experienced it at two where others used them, and they can be extremely convenient when in places where it's difficult to get a phone set up, and inconvenient to run an earpiece.

      In addition, Nextel's PTT (dunno about Verizon's) can be used for group communication, where one person sends a message to multiple people, which can be used to get a response from first available, or just to get a message out to many scattered workers. This is especially useful on construction sites, where, for example, all of the foremen can be contacted in one shot.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    9. Re:We'll see ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not necessarily. It is unlikely that Sprint will change any of its existing business arrangements due to this deal.

      AT&T was different because it was acquired by Cingular, and if you didn't have business with Cingular, you likely lost it.

      But with this merger, it is Sprint that is going to be calling the shots, so I don't think you have anything to worry about. You might worry if your business was with Nextel, but we don't know yet how quickly Nextel will be integrated with Sprint, or if in fact it will be. It could be run as a separate unit within Sprint.

    10. Re:We'll see ... by doi · · Score: 2, Informative

      You may actually have a good chance for work if this does go through. I worked for Nextel for almost 5 years, and their billing system SUCKED. They changed it about 3 years and $2 billion ago, and from what my old co-workers tell me they're STILL having issues with it. Not to mention that Nextel does all of their development work with contractors and outsource companies now...

      --
      A man's reach must exceed his grasp, or what's an erection for?
    11. Re:We'll see ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tought CVG had contracts with ATTWS, Cingular, Verizon, Sprint, etc, etc... as well as MANY MANY other non-wireless phone companies (IBM, MSFT, Proctor and Gamble, General Foods, etc)

    12. Re:We'll see ... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      I lost touch with guys I knew that left here to go to Nextel (mostly consulting). I though I remembered they were using Kenan (before Lucent got their grimy mits on it). What did they go to, dox?

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    13. Re:We'll see ... by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      *sigh* google, then post, not other way round

      http://www.amdocs.com/hotnews.asp?news_id=303

      They have a seven year deal with amdocs that started in 2002 -- Sprint was a customer of ours and left to dox only to come back after they apparently were very unhappy. Hmm, will be interesting to see what they end up doing.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    14. Re:We'll see ... by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

      The connect / disconnect beeps for EVERY little statement drives me nuts from across the room.

      It's fashionable to beep. Nextel wants exactly the attention you describe. Would their phones get noticed if they weren't annoying as hell? It's the same as instant messaging with the boop-beep and beep-boop with every damn message. When I was in college, I could have thrown a chair at the instant messengers. And they didn't have a care in the world.

      --
      -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
    15. Re:We'll see ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, yeah, lots of contracts that don't generate much revenue. ;-)

      AWE was just merged with Cingular and it doesn't look like we may keep much of that business.

      Sprint -- yeah, that's what I'm talking about tho I didn't realize Sprint was doing the buying and Nextel uses the competitor's system that Sprint left us for and then came back (man, that has to be fucked up to come back).

      Lots of other little guys like Triton, Dobson, CincinnatiBell Wireless as well as cable and broadband -- but losing AWE and FON would really suck.

    16. Re:We'll see ... by nial-in-a-box · · Score: 1
      Calling this a "me-too" is suggesting that Sprint and Nextel would merge because the cool kids are doing it. Yea, it looks like they're just jumping on the bandwagon, but this is big business not teenagers we're talking about. Because of the way that U.S. wireless carriers are set up, smaller companies seem to be losing relevance on a daily basis. Some expert said it was about survival of the largest, not survival of the fittest. This is going to make three large wireless companies that are fairly close in size. Perhaps this will in some way lead to better values for consumers because the playing field will be somewhat leveled. I'm not very convinced that will happen though. It seems that Verizon will continue to be for those who simply want a basic cell phone that works most places (and are willing to pay an extra $10 a month for the same plan as other providers). Cingular is for those who want cooler phones, and cheaper plans. Sprint-Nextel will cover business and whatever's left.

      I would like to see numbers on who Nextel's customers really are. I know this is wildly inaccurate, but at my school Nextel phones are quite popular. Probably at least 20% of cell phone carrying students have Nextel. With boost bringing Nextel to the pre-pay customer base, I think they may find even more appeal with a younger audience. I think that if Sprint-Nextel priced all their plans under the competition and slashed phone prices a bit more they could see serious gains in customer base. I'm not even a business major, but it seems obvious and doable to me.

      --
      I am feeling fat and sassy
    17. Re:We'll see ... by BigBuckHunter · · Score: 1

      So far, the Sprint/AWS merger has only involved changing half a billion logos on web pages. I wouldn't consider branding to be a bloodbath. Nextel also caters to kids and teens, but the do so under the Boost brand. It's a pre-paid only service.

      BBH

    18. Re:We'll see ... by doi · · Score: 1
      Yeah, Amdocs pushed very hard to nail that contract. I was peripherally involved with some early data migration issues. Let's just say the old billing data was a mess and Amdocs (thankfully) required a great deal of clean up before they could migrate it. Still, it took a good year to get that fixed.

      The initial deployment, however, was very problematic. The system worked off of Citrix clients, and they did not spec the right hardware to handle the approx. 4000+ users they needed to handle. It has improved since, but there were times when it would take over 30 minutes just to log into the system. The interface was originally done with PowerBuilder, and was very difficult to use in some areas. When you consider the old system was a Telnet session into a Unix box, and it was much easier to use, that should give you some idea how bad it got.

      Naturally it's gotten better, but if Sprint and Nextel decide to merge, that is going to be a very painful transition for their billing area. Nextel has already outsourced their IT (EDS) and call center (can't remember the name) so they might go that way with billing too.

      --
      A man's reach must exceed his grasp, or what's an erection for?
    19. Re:We'll see ... by Jyvin · · Score: 1

      Nextel has to change technologies... the FCC is making them. Because of this mandate, Nextel was going to have to put up BILLIONS to create a new network. Sprint comes along and says hey we will hook you up with our already established network and you give us your PTT customers. This merger makes a lot of sense.

    20. Re:We'll see ... by 1lus10n · · Score: 1

      This merger has been rumored for about 2 years now. The cingular&ATT merger took place because AT&T was getting its teeth kicked in and because cingular didnt want to be the small kid on the block.

      Technologies be damned they are buying into a completely seperate market and thats a smart thing to do right now. I have had sprint for 5 years and have never had a problem with the service. I have had one problem with a phone that they let me return.

      --
      "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." --Albert Einstein
    21. Re:We'll see ... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1

      That people misuse technology doesn't make the technology itself bad. The walkie-talkie feature is immensely useful, but you definitely have no business using it while driving.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    22. Re:We'll see ... by XO · · Score: 1

      Bzzt. Verizon's prices are basically the same (within $5 and/or 100 minutes) of all the other major players. Verizon does not have a market corner on cool phones, but they are getting some nice ones. They also have the market cornered on network reliablity, absolutely period, and no one else will ever touch them.

      Cingular's phones are definitely cool, but only on the high end. The low end cool phones are completely cornered by Sprint. Also Sprint and Verizon's handsets are FAR more reliable, as they will not allow a phone to suck ass and make their networks look like crap.

      But if you want the coolest phones, you get T-Mobile. Of course, you'll never be able to make a call without the other party going "What? I can't understand you." but you'll ahve an awesome phone.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    23. Re:We'll see ... by XO · · Score: 1

      I/O, I'd expect better than this comment from you :P

      "pay up front for the phone"?? Where are you buying your equipment? Oh, wait, you're in Iowa aren't you.. yeah.. Iowa isn't actually Sprint, it's some partner that supplies Sprint with the service, and they don't provide instant rebates. Virtually everywhere else in the country you get anywhere from $150 to $290 off each phone with activation...

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    24. Re:We'll see ... by XO · · Score: 1

      Sprint and Verizon's group-talk works much the same way, and it's free, whereas with Nextel, only the 2-way directconnect is free, you pay for all group calls.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    25. Re:We'll see ... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      The thing is, a lot of Nextels customers used to be Sprint customers. Back around 2000, Sprint was it for the road warrior. Big bucket of minutes, and no roaming. No one could touch them. But the poor customer service and constant billing mistakes drove everyone off. The technology won't mean squat. If the merger goes with Sprint billing and customer service, they will be buying a shell.

    26. Re:We'll see ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only, you can disable the speaker module, and in public those of us not self absorbed do this.

    27. Re:We'll see ... by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

      Eh?

      I thought Cingular and AT&T both used same-frequency GSM. And now Cingular gets to ride in on that EDGE broadband stuff AT&T was doing...

      Why's it going badly?

      --

      +++ATH0
    28. Re:We'll see ... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      That billing change - where the cycle date changed (the woman on the phone said that the parent company changed the billing procedure - I wasn't aware that Nextel had a parent company) so one bill was due 3 weeks after a previous bill. Somehow, my cost was still for 4 weeks of service, despite the period only being 3 weeks long. I can't believe I'm the only person in the world that noticed, but I canceled my subscription a few weeks later and went back to Sprint. I was already irritated that they wouldn't do something else that was trivial (and a long story), but the billing change was the icing on the cake. I'm back with Sprint again, since T-Mobile has 0 coverage here (despite maps claiming the opposite), I just don't like Cingular, and I truly hate Verizon. Granted, I hate Verizon because of some bad data / land line dealings (short version: they cost me personally a couple grand through lying, but I'm too lazy to go to court), and VZW is a separate company that mostly just shares a name, but I can't get past that name. :)

      I liked the Nextel service, and I didn't use the speaker phone in public places (figure out a wiretap/scanner if you wanna listen to my phone call), but the billing change and inadequate explanation really irritated me.

    29. Re:We'll see ... by kaybi · · Score: 1

      Hell, Im in Nextel Care Support and thats new to me, where does this come from? Care to tell us why Nextel has to change technologies? (btw, the bandwith Nextel was fighting over wasnt in use for iDEN)

    30. Re:We'll see ... by kaybi · · Score: 1

      Nextel Call Center Outsourcers:

      TeleTech (um, sucks)

      ACS, Inc. Formerly CyberRep(Tualitin, Gideon, and Coos Bay, Oregon. Kentucky, Maryland, Washington and Juarez Mexico (spanish care)).

    31. Re:We'll see ... by Jyvin · · Score: 1
      Check this out.

      http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/story.asp?guid=%7B 3EAAB40F-9BB2-4049-83BB-BE498FE9810A%7D&siteid=mkt w&dist=

      And I quote...

      "Adding to Nextel's urgency is its planned transfer to another part of the wireless spectrum to avoid interference issues with public safety providers. That could cost $4 billion or higher.

      In addition, Nextel might have to spend several billions more to upgrade the speed and capacity of its network, a decision that could prompt the company to junk its inferior Iden wireless technology in favor of the CDMA standard now used by Sprint. Nextel is the only wireless carrier that uses Iden."

    32. Re:We'll see ... by TeleoMan · · Score: 1
      --
      $6.21 is the number of the beast before sales tax. Meh.
  3. Misprint by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 5, Funny

    According to CNet, the different networks could bring expensive problems, but that could be overcome by the diversity of the company's clients.

    This sentence should read: "According to CNet, the different networks could bring expensive problems, but that could be overcome by making the customers pay through the nose"

    --
    Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    1. Re:Misprint by wcitechnologies · · Score: 1
      I hate random political correctness. "Uh, we don't really have an answer for this problem. I know! Lets compliment the customer's diversity!"

      Reminds me of a certain episode of South Park.

      --
      Electrons are free; it is moving them that becomes expensive.
    2. Re:Misprint by hendridm · · Score: 1
      but that could be overcome by making the customers pay through the nose

      In that case, they must have been a deal years in the making! :P

  4. Buiing companies to grow by canuck57 · · Score: 1

    Too bad Sprint didn't learn from NorTel, ATT, Compaq, HP and others. The best way to get to be bigger is to grow a company not in aquiring others.

    Another CEO mistake.

    1. Re:Buiing companies to grow by binary42 · · Score: 1

      That is what you think... I have been through many companies and aquiring brings "value" (sarcastically used -- whether or not it makes your company more successful or larger). I agree in a basic sense that companies need to concentrate on themselves before they go out like this but investors just don't think that way so your stock may or may not change in the short term (yeah... darn short sighted CEOs who want their bonus ;) ).

      --
      ruby -le"32.times{|y|print' '*(31-y),(0..y).map{|x|~y&x>0?' .':' A'}}"
    2. Re:Buiing companies to grow by nbvb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      well, that depends.

      When the Bell Atlantic/GTE/AirTouch/PrimeCo merger was announced, it made lots of sense.

      For the most part, the technology was the same, and there was little coverage overlap. They basically took 4 companies -- a Northeast, South, West, and Southwest company, and made them one.

      Cingular/ATT is all overlap, but at least similar technology.

      Nextel/Sprint is even worse..... It's all overlap, and completely different technologies.

    3. Re:Buiing companies to grow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's probably not a mistake. When companies merge, the top executives can obtain tangible benefits (e.g: commissions, special dividends). As a matter of fact, there are a lot of corporations where the top executives obtain commissions (or other benefits) when they approve mergers, acquisitions ... - their employment contracts states that they are entitled to such "benefits" when they approve such deals (without any clause restraining such intent, even if the deal is bad for the companies involved).

    4. Re:Buiing companies to grow by JavaMoose · · Score: 1
      Actually, if done right, buying a company CAN increase your profits and growth - and can be good for both sides.

      For example, the 22bil/yr company I work for just bought a 75mil/yr company that was no2 in a field we couldn't expand into. Now we are in that field, and with what we brought to the table, have grown their business to 100mil/yr in a few month. Into the billions in a few (2) years (projected).

    5. Re:Buiing companies to grow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nextel is dumping its technology, in a sense, because they have to move their equipment anyhow. So basically they're asking Sprint to help them with their upgrade and move and saying here are all of our customers.

    6. Re:Buiing companies to grow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nextel has to get out of the 800 spectrum, and needed a 3G upgrade path. IDEN is a dead end technology. Merging with Sprint and letting Sprint pay for their upgrade to new technology makes a lot of sense for Nextel.

    7. Re:Buiing companies to grow by s.o.terica · · Score: 1

      Seeing as how Nextel is going to have to give out all new phones anyway when they move their network spectrum, there's absolutely no functional reason why they wouldn't move to CDMA 1xRTT at the same time. That way they can use Sprint's network on 1900MHz while they're building out their own network. Which would be a much better plan than AT&T had when they moved everybody from their IS-136 TDMA network to a GSM network with a fraction of the coverage area.

    8. Re:Buiing companies to grow by bullitB · · Score: 1

      It's all overlap, and completely different technologies.

      They're overlapping, and yet completely different, huh? 8)

      In all seriousness, this is really exactly what Sprint needs. Their primary problem right now is that they don't have any low-freq spectrum space, they only have stuff in the PCS range. Nextel has stuff in the 800/900 MHz range. So, yeah, it will take a year or two to migrate the cells (and Nextel customers) from iDEN to CDMA, but Sprint is already doing the 1xRTT -> 1xEV-DO/DV transition, so this can't be too terribly hard. And if they have the rights to the spectrum, they could start switching their current cells to the lower frequencies as soon as possible, and slowly turn down Nextel capacity as they switch to CDMA phones.

    9. Re:Buiing companies to grow by Jyvin · · Score: 1

      You are right on. Sprint and Nextel apart will be fighting to compete with the big 2. Together they can do some real damage because of what they both bring to the table.

    10. Re:Buiing companies to grow by kaybi · · Score: 1

      Nextel/Sprint is even worse..... It's all overlap, and completely different technologies.

      *cough*TelusMobility*cough*

  5. wall st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Wall Street Journal is reporting that Sprint and Nextel have tentatively agreed to basic terms of a merger. The $36 billion deal would create a third giant cellular carrier with nearly 39 million subscribers. Although Sprint shareholders will retain more than 50% of the combined company, to be called "Sprint-Nextel", the merger will otherwise be mutual. The new company will have a 50-50 split among board members from each company. The new company would spin off Sprint's local landline operations. Nothing has been finalized yet, but the companies are said to be "advanced negotiations", and an official announcement could come next week.

    http://www.phonescoop.com/

    1. Re:wall st by Patik · · Score: 5, Funny
      the combined company, to be called "Sprint-Nextel"
      Darn, I was hoping for Sprixtel, or Nextint, or maybe Sextel.
    2. Re:wall st by AtillaTheKilla · · Score: 1

      maybe nextInt... damn there's that java again

    3. Re:wall st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like the Sextel notion. Where would I sign up?

  6. network type. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets just hope they don't go with Sprints "special" technology... then the US would finally be a bit closer to other places (europe & japan etc..) regarding wireless technology (disregarding spectrums right now though.. FCC?).

    1. Re:network type. by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Sprint uses CDMA, which is the dominant technology in much of Asia (and will be until 3G takes over, if it does). I don't know how popular Nextel's iDEN is outside the Americas, though.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:network type. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean GSM as the dominant technology in Asia. The same technology used by OmniPoint/VoiceStream/T-Mobile and more recently Cingular/AT&T.

      The only places they use CDMA are USA, Japan, and Iraq.

    3. Re:network type. by WhytTiger · · Score: 1
      Just FYI, Nextel ALSO uses CDMA, the iDEN technologies are on top of CDMA. The one major difference I see is that Sprint uses the PCS band (1900 MHz), a technically weaker band while Nextel uses the Cell Band (800 MHz). I would suspect that if Sprit buys Nextel, you will no longer hear "the only all PCS, all Digital..." and the coverage in rural areas on Sprint will improve.

      In terms of asia, CDMA should still be the dominant technology into 4G. With improvements like EV-DO, CDMA can attain 3G data rates, so is technically can be a 3G network already.

      --
      My Sig Beat up your Honor Roll Sig
    4. Re:network type. by blackdevl · · Score: 1

      the fact that iDEN is based on TDMA, kind of makes me think thats its not running over CDMA.

    5. Re:network type. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iDEN is a variant of GSM, with extra features for low-latency dispatch (that walkie-talkie thing.)

      There's a push-to-talk for CDMA networks, but I understand it goes over package data, and is painfully slow to connect. Nextel derided it as 'push-to-wait'.

    6. Re:network type. by s.o.terica · · Score: 1

      iDEN is definitely a TDMA-based technology, as is GSM. It's not CDMA.

    7. Re:network type. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't talk shit.
      CDMA is not the dominant technology in any place in the world.
      GSM is by far the dominant technology, worldwide.

    8. Re:network type. by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Sorry. In the future, I'd like to contact you before I post a comment. What's your email address?

      Don't talk shit.
      CDMA is not the dominant technology in any place in the world.
      GSM is by far the dominant technology, worldwide.
      --
      For more information, click here.
  7. Nextel and the art of communication by Nine+Tenths+of+The+W · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this the same Nextel who once showed a fine grasp of taste by running an ad campaign called "The Final Solution" featuring a Hitler impersonator promising to "exterminate all dues"?

    More on this here

    --
    Slashdot: News for Nerds, Stuff that matters only to them
    1. Re:Nextel and the art of communication by doi · · Score: 1

      RTFA moron.

      --
      A man's reach must exceed his grasp, or what's an erection for?
    2. Re:Nextel and the art of communication by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. Let's boycott a company forever because they made one PR mistake.

      Taking your ideology to heart, I'm going to start boycotting Slashdot because of that godawful Slashdot Cruiser they raffled off.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:Nextel and the art of communication by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 3, Informative

      An independent dealer issued the advertising materials and Nextel acted quickly to cut relations with them and stop the advertisements.

      --

      HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
    4. Re:Nextel and the art of communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People go off the deep end so much in regards to anything that is connected with racism at all, that they can't even see humor in something harmless and discern what is intended to be something more, and when something is just a joke. Look at the commercial for what it is. Don't try to make it into something more. If your white, keep your guilt to yourself. If your a jew, they said dues. Not jews. Let the past be in the past.

    5. Re:Nextel and the art of communication by muletool · · Score: 1

      What is this I'm guilty of?

      --
      Can I bum you a .sig?
    6. Re:Nextel and the art of communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahah!!! that's hilarious!!

  8. goodbye cheap phones / packages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    from the article
    If regulators approve a Sprint-Nextel merger, Montezemolo said, "those great deals that consumers have come to expect and the ever-better packages will be a thing of the past."


    oh well.

    ---------------
    http://freedvr.home.comcast.net/
  9. telco dreams by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    ", the different networks could bring expensive problems, but that could be overcome by the diversity of the company's clients"

    "It's a bad deal, that won't work, but we'll be passing those savings on to our customers!"

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  10. What about the technology? by prisoner · · Score: 1

    I am a nextel customer. Have been for years. The PTT is the only reason. With the spectrum swap in the recent past and now this, I wonder what happens to the phones that I use for my business? I don't know a hell of a lot about cell phone tech but I don't imagine that my nextel will work on multiple freqs. It is starting to sound like I'm gonna have to buy all new phones. Access to the fast data network on the sprint side would be nice but I don't need it so bad that I'm gonna junk $1500 worth of phones....

    1. Re:What about the technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Access to the fast data network on the sprint side would be nice but I don't need it so bad that I'm gonna junk $1500 worth of phones....

      Holy shit, Sprint data is fast?! Is that a setting, or have I been using the wrong intarweb? I'd hate to see how slow the competition is. Makes me yearn for my old 1200 bajad modem, and that think didn't cost me an extra $15/month.

    2. Re:What about the technology? by MajestikMoose · · Score: 1

      The iDEN network (Nextel's) and the CDMA network (Sprint's) are two completely different kinds of technology, you're right in saying that your Nextel phone isn't going to work on Sprint's network. For that reason I don't think that they are going to implement a network merger of any kind, Sprint's PTT is not nearly as good (or as popular) as Nextel's. And since PTT is what draws Nextel's customer base, for them to scrap that in favor of Sprint's technology would be financial suicide.

    3. Re:What about the technology? by jseale · · Score: 1
      Sprint PCS also has PTT functionality on its network, but it's nothing like Nextel's though. This merger is the perfect opportunity to at least get that particular aspect of the tech disparity between the two companies worked out.

      You also have to wonder which 'pay as you go' service will win out in this merger. I think it'll be Sprint's Virgin Mobile since it has 'star power' so to speak and it's been around longer than Nextel's Boost. Hey, when was the last time you saw Boost's phone cards in stores? Virgin Mobile also gets alot of action from Target stores which carry the full Virgin product line in the electronics department.

  11. Consolidate is expected, plus Nextel Phones rock by FerretFrottage · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In this area consolidation is exepcted. How many carriers can the market space really support...I say 3 just because it's a magic number I think Nextel is currently the number 5 wireless carrier, not sure about sprint, but I think it's in the top 3 (Verizon is/was number 1 last time I checked).

    The thing I love about Nextel are their phones. From a developers [J2ME] perspective, the are very easy to work with (except for webjal). Specifically, their iDen network and their programming APIs allow access to the GPS functionality of the phone. The i730 has a complete programmers' guide available for download from the Motorla site. Can't wait to get my hands on their latest camera phone to see if you can programatically control the camera. Then you could snap a pic and tag the info with the GPS coordinates.

    Additionally, they [Nextel] have a nice developers site. Downside is that I find Nextel converage to be much worse than Verizon, so I ended up needing a Verizon phone for actual talking and a Nextel one for fun development.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. As a sprint user... by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


    I kind of like the idea of merging with nextel. Maybe this will eventually make it so I can have one of the memory chips that allows me to transfer my account/number/phone memory right to another phone just like Nextel. Right now, I cannot do that with Sprint, which makes it a hassle and a $35 cost to activate a new phone.

    But thing that irritates me the most about Nextel phones is that people feel it is a good idea to carry out entire conversations with the radio feature...STOP IT!!! And if more people (ie the Sprint customer base) get this feature, I think I will be driven insae. If you need to have an entire conversation, just call them instead of repeatedly beeping back and forth in the grocery store! Or at least turn off the sound so the rest of us can't hear it.

    1. Re:As a sprint user... by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      I think the radio feature was unilimited with the basic fee. That might have something to do with it... ;)

    2. Re:As a sprint user... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      I'm on my third phone with Nextel, and not once have the chips been movable to the new phone. There are ways to transfer the data, but swapping chips does not seem to be one of them, unless it's the same model, or perhaps very nearly so.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    3. Re:As a sprint user... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think the radio feature was unilimited with the basic fee. That might have something to do with it... ;)

      Actually, minutes for 2 way come from a pool shared by all phones on the plan, usually. People tend to use 2 way because their boss (who likely pays for their phone) doesn't see who's using 2 way on the bill, but if you call someone using the cell phone it shows up itemized on the bill and he'll say "who the hell were you talking to for 65 minutes during work that day?"

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:As a sprint user... by Mr.+Spontaneous · · Score: 1

      Actually, they don't. We get a certain number of 2-way minutes, and this is independent of the normal plan minutes.

      --
      Its all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then its just fun.
    5. Re:As a sprint user... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are called sim cards and yes they are interchangeable. The only exception being that you can't migrate 32 bit to 64 bit and vice versa without phone corruption. It works, sometimes for a long period of time, but eventually craps out. I've bought a new phone and simply switched sims and it worked beautifully. If they told you they couldn't switch sims either you were changing generations or they are liars.

    6. Re:As a sprint user... by Artemis · · Score: 1

      As a longtime Nextel user I have also never been able to move the chip to the new phone, even on the exact same model. Apparantly it has something to do with the way the #'s are recorded in their billing system or some junk. Thankfully they have always transferred all of my data to the new phone for free.

    7. Re:As a sprint user... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      Actually, they don't. We get a certain number of 2-way minutes, and this is independent of the normal plan minutes.

      Actually, that was precisely the point I was making. 2-way minutes generally come out of a common pool, while regular calls come out of minutes assigned to each phone. People have a tendency to use the 2-way because 2-way time use isn't itemized on the bill, while cell calls are.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    8. Re:As a sprint user... by XO · · Score: 1

      Maybe if you just buy a data cable, then you can actually manipulate your data using a real computer, as well.. it's much better than having a stupid memory chip that can be destroyed, shorted, cloned, erased, and other bad things.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    9. Re:As a sprint user... by jjhall · · Score: 1

      Actually they do, depending on your service plan. I use Nextel, and my plan includes unlimited direct connect. I can use it as much as I like, and not incurr any extra fees. Now Group Connect is different and charged by the minute.

      Even though Nextel is more expensive when you look directly at the numbers, it actually can work out to be cheaper. Most of my family members have Nextel, so we get free Direct Connect between us. Free evenings and weekends, so we generally just call during that time. And yes, I do turn off the speaker when using DC around others, so I'm not one of those annoying people walking around going "beep-beep-beep" all the time.

      The biggest thing that makes Nextel cheaper for me is the free incomming minutes I get with my plan. I like the fact that people can call me all they want, and it doesn't change my bill. My outgoing minutes are for *me* to use when I choose to use them, not to be used whenever the phone is in use as the other carriers choose to do.

      I'd been an AT&T customer for about 6 years, and switched to Nextel about 3 months ago due to the rest of my family being happy. I had a couple of technical issues with my phone but Motorola warranty service resolved that. I couldn't be happier with the service itself.

      The biggest thing to keep in mind is that the plan your company chooses to put your phone on doesn't necessarily represent the entire offerings of a company. Nextel has several different plans, some including unlimited direct connect, some that have a (limited) pool that can be individual or shared between phones, and some plans that charge by the minute of direct connect. Your company obviously feels they get the better value by having a limited pool of minutes, whereas I get better value with a plan that has unlimited.

      Jeremy

    10. Re:As a sprint user... by jjhall · · Score: 1

      It actually just depends on the phone. My wife had an older Nextel phone (i60) that wasn't being used, so when my phone (i730) needed to be sent in for warranty service, I just used her old one.

      Hers was a model that doesn't "work" with the new larger-memory-size SIMs as my phone uses. Therefore the phone could not access the address book of the SIM, but it still let me use the phone with direct connect, Internet, and standard calling. Nextel said I had the choice to take it in and transfer my data and service to the old style SIM at no charge, but since I only needed it for a week or so, I just waited and dealt with the inconvenience of using the web address book exclusively.

      If I were to buy a new phone from them, like the new camera phone, I could just take my SIM and put it in the new phone. I would be up and running without even needing to call them. My brother broke his phone about a year ago, and he has been using his girlfriend's old phone for the whole year now, and Nextel doesn't even know the difference, or at least they don't care. Both phones use the older SIM style so he didn't have any issues at all.

      As you said, they always offer to transfer data for free if you need to switch between SIM types, so it isn't much of a concern in reality. In the 6 years of using AT&T TDMA service, they never once offered to transfer my data to a new phone. When I inquired, they either charged an unreasonable fee, or didn't have ability to do so. Their new GSM service is obviously different, but my point is at least Nextel offers the ability at no charge, even if it means walking into the local store.

      Jeremy

  14. Does me no good by DongleFondle · · Score: 1

    I would personally much rather see Sprint teaming up with a carrier that actually has decent coverage in more rural areas. In my opinion, for the demographic Sprint caters to, they should be focusing more on expanding their network off of the major metropolitan areas and putting investment into their own company instead of trying to buy up some non-compatible competitor. What possible good could this do me as a Sprint user?

    1. Re:Does me no good by cybertears · · Score: 1

      in my area nextel is the only carrier that covers places that every other carrier can't. My grandparents live only 10 minutes out of Columbus and sprint, att, verizon, all of them don't work worth shit... not even roaming. Nextel works perfect. I'm hoping it will be easy to switch from my sprint service to nextel service once this merger is final.

    2. Re:Does me no good by DongleFondle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there are a LOT of situations around the country where one company is dominant in the non-metropolitan areas. In my area, (and well, many others) Alltel is the only provider that will cover you out in BFE. But if you look at the two coverage maps for Sprint and Nextel, you will see that they are already catering to all the metropolitan areas around the country. My point was that instead of buying a company that has basically already done exactly what they are doing with a completely non-compatible technology, they should invest that money in their own company, expand their network and give the people in the rural areas competition and choice.

    3. Re:Does me no good by SaDan · · Score: 1

      I agree entirely.

      From my own personal experiences, Nextel has very poor coverage in rural areas (Indiana, Illinois, Ohio, Salt Lake, Washington, Wisconsin). I carry a Nextel for work, and when I travel, it's important that the phone actually work.

      Nextel service is even pretty cruddy in the NW suburbs of Chicago!

      Nextel/Sprint both need to improve their coverage areas, and this merger isn't going to do it.

    4. Re:Does me no good by Jyvin · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of behind the scene things that will help you as a Sprint user. Buying Nextel will give them a load of 1.9 MHz spectrum. This allows for future growth that other wireless carriers might have problems with in the future. Also, Nextel's Push-to-Talk is far more advanced than Sprint's or Verizon's. Bringing this technology to Sprint is nothing but a plus. There will be some growing pains, but overall, this is a good move for both companies.

    5. Re:Does me no good by Artemis · · Score: 1

      In southeastern Michigan Nextel's rural coverage cannot be beat. For example, when I'm out at the lake (20 miles from civilization outside the lake itself) I can still get 3-4 bars with Nextel, but my Sprint phone will lose all reception during the beginning of my drive out there, when I'm still 15 miles from the lake (ie, 5 miles from civilization). In my personal experience this also seems to be true throughout the state, but it could simply be that they are "the carrier" for this area.

    6. Re:Does me no good by DongleFondle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, once again, all of that really doesn't make a difference to me if none of it works ten minutes outside of my home city. Now, it may very well be a wonderful opportunity for both companies, but its really not the sort of thing that's helping me out to any great extent.

  15. Virgin Mobile by Patik · · Score: 1

    What will become of Virgin Mobile, which uses Sprint's network? Hopefully it will stay the same at worst or add Nextel's network at best.

    1. Re:Virgin Mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose not much will happen with Virgin Mobile USA. What I think will be interesting is to see what happens to Boost, which is Nextel's version of a pre-paid plan. Interestingly, it has almost the exact same terms and rates as Virgin Mobile USA; it was the only clear competitor, in my book, to the pre-paid offerings of Virgin Mobile USA. They both had 25 cents per minute flat rates with a $20 minimum every 3 months.

      The other prepaid offerings weren't even close; they had varying rates depending on how much you wanted to spend, and what really irked me most, was if you didn't use your account balance by a certain date, you forfeited minutes.

    2. Re:Virgin Mobile by Jyvin · · Score: 1

      It will stay with Sprint. Sprint has multi-year agreements in place with Virgin.

    3. Re:Virgin Mobile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they just announced another MVNO deal for ESPN phone service.

      Everyone is thrilled with the way the Virgin MVNO has worked out. Sprint is making money hand over fist selling excess capacity, Virgin loves not having to own towers, and Virgin's customers love the service. Win-Win-Win.

      Sprint will be doing a lot more MVNO deals as will Cingular and Verizon and anyone else who can work out the billing. It's an easy way to make bank.

      If a a certain fruity computer company ever launches their alleged phone, you can bet it will be an MVNO.

  16. Heh... by mswope · · Score: 1

    "while Sprint appeals to families and teens."

    More like Sprint is *tolerated* by families and teens. At least it's cheap.

    1. Re:Heh... by TheAntiCrust · · Score: 0, Troll

      What are you talking about? Sprint is teh rocks!!! I used it all the time and loved it. It felt like I had a land line with me all the time where-ever I went. My dad switched to cingular to save money (it was almost a THIRD the price) and I HATED my cell phone. It never ever got reception anywhere. It has to be the worst cell phone service I have ever had. Now I just recently got my own sprint phone again and I am so happy! I can make calls again! ee!

    2. Re:Heh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. It's not even tolerated. If I were not stuck for another year with it, I would switch to someone else. Sprint PCS is the worst phone service I've had, right next to T-mobile.

  17. AT&T Wireless, not AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a note, AT&T didn't merge. It was a company called AT&T Wireless. That company at one time did come completely from AT&T, but was diversified before AT&T Wireless decided to merge with Cingular. Today, AT&T is still on it's own. It's pretty small by it's previous standards, and now that Spring is merging I expect AT&T's time is coming.

  18. NEXTEL is my cheapest option by geniusj · · Score: 1

    I know I'm in the minority. But people complaining about NEXTEL's prices don't realize that they're the cheapest option for some people. First of all, free incoming calls is HUGE. As it stands now, my minutes are tapped only for outgoing calls made on the weekday during the day. I have a 600 minute free incoming plan and I use at least 2,000 minutes every month. I'll typically have at least 1200 minutes of incoming calls with the rest being spread out between nights and weekends and prime time. But I have still never exceeded the 600 minutes.

    3,000 minutes for $70/mo? I'll take it. It just fits my calling patterns best.

    1. Re:NEXTEL is my cheapest option by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      First of all, free incoming calls is HUGE. As it stands now, my minutes are tapped only for outgoing calls made on the weekday during the day. I have a 600 minute free incoming plan and I use at least 2,000 minutes every month.

      Can it really be said you have free incoming minutes if there is a 600 minute limit in there. Sounds like just another plan stipulation.

      I have an older T-Mobile plan that gives me the first incoming minute free, unlimited.

    2. Re:NEXTEL is my cheapest option by geniusj · · Score: 1

      You misread my post. I have unlimited incoming minutes.

      From the post:
      As it stands now, my minutes are tapped only for outgoing calls made on the weekday during the day.

    3. Re:NEXTEL is my cheapest option by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      I cant beleive that 'free incoming minutes' is a selling point for you guys in the states! Ive never ever had a contract which made me pay for incoming anything (calls, data, sms), and ive had a mobile phone for going on 10 years. Where am I? The UK. My current contract costs me less than $30 per month including insurance for the phone, 200 free any time any network minutes per month, and 30 sms messages per month, and the phone (Samsung E700) was completely free.

    4. Re:NEXTEL is my cheapest option by geniusj · · Score: 1

      It evens itself out. I know that in the UK no cell customers pay for incoming calls. However, last I checked, it costs quite a bit more to call a UK cell phone than it does to call a UK land line. In the US, there is no difference. My theory is that the cost is made up by the extra charge levied on the calling party. It just looks like two different approaches. But here in the US, as far as I know (and someone PLEASE correct me if I'm wrong), NEXTEL is the only carrier that is currently offering free incoming calls.

    5. Re:NEXTEL is my cheapest option by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Ahh that might be it then, we do have to pay for incoming if we go international with the phone, but thats starting to change, since the telecommunications watchdog has told the various telecoms companies to bring down the charges on fixed-to-mobile calls. That said, our mobile number range is completely different to fixed lines (07*** verses 01***, with 08*** for non geographic calls), whereas Ive been told the US has it all mixed in, same range for both fixed and mobile?

    6. Re:NEXTEL is my cheapest option by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      In the US we have a smaller differentiation. US numbers are 10 digits if you ignore the 1 country code. The first three numbers make up an area code which usually include a city (NY now has two LA might have two also) but generally they encompass a small region. Mobile and fixed lines share an area code. The next three numbers are for an exchange and are generally consistent within cities and towns (if you are in a small town you all have the same three numbers but the next town over will have a differeent set of three numbers) mobile numbers use a different set of 3 exchange numbers.
      With regard to billing, from a fixed line, we have free local calling based on what is called a LATA which generally coveres an entire town, so you get free calls to your entire town from a fixed line. From a fixed line you do not pay for recieving a call.
      Mobile calls are priced based on accessing the network either send or recieve, and the differentiator is time. During business hours mobile plans generally have a fixed number of minutes of calling (say 200-1000 per month) to send and recieve calls, after hours and on weekends most plans sold today allow either unlimited or enough minutes to be unlimited for most people.
      It's my understanding that the big differences between Europe and US telecom are calling party pays, higher pop density, and the US had higher fixed line penetration prior to the development of wireless telecom which is why we have lagged Europe in mobile penetration (even though generally the larger number of carriers has resulted in considerably cheaper mobile service in the US. We're only at about 50% penetration of mobile phones.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    7. Re:NEXTEL is my cheapest option by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Ah, I see.

      I actually hear this is how it works for most European providers. I thik that as landline phones become less and less "normal" people will begin to demand their cellphone service is billed more like their landline, and European cellphone providers do.

    8. Re:NEXTEL is my cheapest option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OR better than that, in the Richmond/Connertucky area, Sprint has Unlimited Local Calling with free long distance for just $55. You can call anywhere in the US, just as long as you're calling from within the Richmond/Connertucky area, if not, it's 0.10 per min. I wonder how long it's goint to be before someone is going to have a true nationwide Plan with no roaming costs and unlimited anytime minutes for around $50 to $70.

  19. Nextel's spectrum only useable by IDEN tech? by richardoz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what possible technology can be used for the 800Mhz spectrum to carry cellular/pcs/what-have-you traffic other than IDEN technology.

    The 800Mhz frequencies Nextel uses are the leftovers from the SMR group with channel spacing of 25Khz and are shared with Public Safety and Heavy Industrial (like utilities). It's not a clean contiguous block of spectrum like the PCS carriers have.

    This must be a consolidation of companies for other reasons...

    --
    All the worlds indeed a .sig, and we are mearly players..
    1. Re:Nextel's spectrum only useable by IDEN tech? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This must be a consolidation of companies for other reasons...

      yeah--power, ego, and jealousy.

  20. All these mergers and one that I wish would happen by reiggin · · Score: 1
    I just want Verizon to buy out Alltel. Alltel has this magic hold on some people in the Southeast and if Verizon would just go ahead and swallow them up, I could call EVERYONE i know for free on the Verizon InNetwork.

    Verizon's InNetwork is the best in my opinion. Free calls all the time to Verizon customers. What we need is a monopoly by Verizon so that all my calls will be free. :o)

  21. Let's get something accurate first... by sacremon · · Score: 2, Informative

    AT&T did not merge with Cingular. AT&T Wireless, which had already been spun off from AT&T, merged with Cingular. AT&T is still around as a separate company.

    --
    If you can't beat them, embrace and extend them.
  22. Which cellular tech.in Japan? (Re:network type) by mah! · · Score: 1
    Not exactly.

    According to the Japanese Cellular Phones FAQ cellular phone networks in Japan use PDC (TDMA-like, used only in Japan) for 2G networks and both WCDMA (successor to GSM) and CDMA2000 (successor to CDMA) for 3G networks.

    By the way, GSM is the only global standard which has coverage in almost every country in the world:
    with a cheap GSM quad-band phone like the Moto V400, you can roam in 212 countries, and you can keep using the same phone by purchasing pay-per-use SIM cards anywhere. Try that with a CDMA or iDEN phone...

    1. Re:Which cellular tech.in Japan? (Re:network type) by bullitB · · Score: 1

      Try that with a CDMA or iDEN phone...

      Check out the Samsung i790. It's a combination CDMA/GSM phone. You can pretty much use it anywhere they use CDMA (South Korea, Canada, US, parts of China, Taiwan, Thailand, Israel, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, India....there's a lot of them), then you can use in GSM mode in all the other countries. Pretty cool.

    2. Re:Which cellular tech.in Japan? (Re:network type) by mah! · · Score: 1
      Samsung i790? I found the Samsung i730 which is a PDA, and the Samsung A790 which is a CDMA 800 / CDMA 1900 / GSM 900 / GSM 1800 phone. With the A790, in North America you can't use any GSM network since they all operate on 850/1900MHz, and you can't use the CDMA2000 operators you list, since the phone is a 2G CDMA device.
      All in all, this phone is no equivalent to the ubiquitous "swap your SIM and go" quad-band GSM phones ... and these come quite cheap nowadays.

      The link you provide (CDMA site) while a useful list of CDMA-2000 operators, it is not at all the same as the list of 2G CDMA operators (which is less extensive).

      And while you find GSM networks in almost all countries which have CDMA or CDMA2000 (e.g. in the US it is now about 50%-50%), the opposite is by far not true. Both by coverage, by countries and by number of users, GSM is the standard (e.g. over 1000M GSM vs. 226M CDMA)

      Even where CDMA operators exist, you can't bring your phone to one of those countries and swap a SIM, because there is no SIM... you need a new phone anyway to use their service at local rates (while any unlocked GSM phone can accept a SIM from any GSM operator in the world).

      Finally, GSM is vendor-independent - not tied to a single company like CDMA with Qualcomm...

  23. Nextel has everything to gain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nextel has everything to gain from this.

    Nextel has been getting ready to get off of the 800 band anyhow since they are interfering with emergency services. Here's the catch though, Nextel does NOT have the money to aquire a whole new band and no one would buy the old 800 or if they did it would be for very cheap. In comes Sprint and Nextel gets to slowly wean their costomers off of the 800 band onto Sprints without the enormous expense of buying their own band.

    Nextel also gets the benefit of Sprints nationwide longdistance. No more need to make other deals for that "FREE" longdistance everyone comes to expect. Realize that the wired end is still very valuable as Sprint is wholesaling it many other companies like Cable providers who are trying to get into the local telephone buisiness.

    Also Sprint is wholesaling other parts of its network out, like the 5 year deal with AT&T to provide them wireless serivice.

    The only thing Sprint is really getting is buisness customers, which it is salivating over... other than that Nextel is making out like a bandit.

  24. Sprint will destroy Nextel by rubmytummy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was a Sprint customer two separate times for a total of three years. I thought the design of their network services was incompetent: as an example, they never did provide two-way SMS, you had to use a very slow WAP page to send messages. Stability of calls was consistently inconsistent. The brand of phones that treated me best (Nokia) they carried the fewest models of, and most of the others had poor design and quality. They were constantly doing backflips trying to sell useless flashy techno-gewgaws, and ignoring the idea of improving basic services. The only company that was worse, in my experience, was AT&T.

    Nextel, on the other hand . . . Best I can tell, Nextel's service has it all over everybody, bar none. They offer network features no-one else can even come close to, and I don't just mean the walkie-talkie thing. Their services and features are actually interesting, useful, and well documented! Almost everyone I know who uses Nextel just loves them. The only shortcoming I've ever even heard of is modest geographical coverage, which, sadly, was the show-stopper for me. So now Nextel's merging with Sprint. What a disaster for Nextel. Both the differences in their technology and the fact this is a merger not a buyout will prevent Nextel from fixing Sprint, unlike Cingular with AT&T Wireless. (The latter really stank; trust me on this.) Sprint's grasping incompetence will suffuse Nextel like red dye bleeding through the laundry, and where we had a big clumsy company and a smaller, really good one, there'll just be one really big, rather poor one. What a shame.

    1. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      It's unfortunate your entire post is one giant lie. Sprint has had two way SMS for the past 5 years (or more). I have no clue as to where you got the idea you had to use a WAP page for sending text messages. *boggle.

      Nokia phones are the lowest reliability phones on the market. They are literally the crappiest phones you can buy. If they "treatet you well," I would hate to see what treats you poorly.

      Sprint also has had a PTT solution similar to Nextels for over a year now. Eh.

    2. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by davie · · Score: 1

      Sprint did not offer real SMS until the beginning of 2004. Prior to 2004, all of Sprint's messaging was implemented via a web-based product called shortmail. All Sanyo phones through the 8100 and all Samsung phones through the a620 were shortmail phones.

      Shortmail is a sub-optimal messaging solution because it is slow and the implementation is unnecessarily complex. Shortmail is a pain to support: troubleshooting involves verification of access to the Vision network (a properly provisioned device, successful authentication to the AAA, etc.), a stable browser instance, and successful authentication to the shortmail server. Mobile originated/terminated SMS, on the other hand, is faster, more reliable, and much easier to support.

      --
      slashdot broke my sig
    3. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      You are so wrong, I don't even know where to begin.

      Shortmail was used concurrently with Sprints SMS service. There was no web-based product that was required to be used, regardless of whether you were using shortmail or sms; it was transparent to the user.

      Regardless of the complexity of the back end authentication, the user experience was that of being able to send and receive SMS messages, and the user has been able to do that for the past several years. So the original posters premise is totally false, as is yours. Web based text messaging was not a *requirement* to send sms.

    4. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by Realm+Lord · · Score: 1

      Using WAP is phone dependent. My old phone had text messaging (just not SMS) that I could send directly from the phone.

      Now I have an older Sanyo SCP-5300 which I have to log into a Sprint messaging website to send a message, really annoying. So I think it really all has to do with the phone manufacturer.

    5. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by vsync64 · · Score: 1
      My coworker has a Sanyo phone with Sprint service. He cannot send or receive SMS without going through the WAP interface. He has called customer service to confirm this, and they said he must purchase a new phone in order to have true SMS functionality.

      It is absolutely not transparent to the user. If I send him SMS he has to sit there and wait for 5 minutes for the slow WAP site. Strangely if I send him an email to xxxxxxxxxx@messaging.sprintpcs.com it goes straight to his phone, but he cannot reply.

      If you don't believe me I will get him to post here.

      --
      TO BUY A NEW CAR WOULD MAKE YOU SEXUALLY ATTRACTIVE.
    6. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by davie · · Score: 1

      You don't know where to begin because you're clueless on the subject. Prior to two-way SMS, there was one-way SMS which was Mobile Terminated only, meaning that messages could not be sent from the device and could not be replied to, and there was Shortmail. Shortmail is "two way", but relies on a web interface. You may not believe this, but I know it to be a fact. Why do you suppose the Shortmail Inbox is accessible from the Vision Home Page? Why is it that a device that is unable to authenticate to AAA (error 67, 97, 1012, etc.) is also unable to send or receive shortmail? Don't confuse Shortmail notifications with the actual messages they relate to, a notification is simply an alphanumeric page. In order to retrieve the announced message, one is still required to log in to the messaging server via the browser.

      --
      slashdot broke my sig
    7. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by Jyvin · · Score: 1

      Prevent Nextel from fixing Sprint! You got to be kidding me! Sprint has its problems for sure (customer service, holes in network) but not near the problems Nextel has. Do you realize they must recreate their entire network for a mistake they knew about when they first started their "perfect" little wireless company! While Sprint is signing deals to fix their problems and expand out their network, Nextel is spinning its wheels figuring out how to deal with their spectrum issues. Nextel certainly has more to gain from Sprint than the other way around.

    8. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by XO · · Score: 1

      Actually, Nokia's phones are consistently top notch... except for the ones they make for Sprint.

      It's too bad all the other networks that Nokia makes good phones for suck ass.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    9. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by RasputinAXP · · Score: 1

      Sorry, my work phones from Cingular have all been Nokias (5100, 8200 and...I forget, one that had a nice number pad for once) and they suck ass. Not durable in the least. I drop mine every now and then. The 5100's battery would slide off the contacts and cause me to drop calls, the 8200 had horrible reception...I have a ton of complaints in regards to Cingular's Nokia series of phones.

      Sprint's Sanyo 8100 and 8200 have been great to me, though.

    10. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by XO · · Score: 1

      ah, yes, i love my 8200, i just upgraded from the 8100 about a week ago.. going to exchange it for the 7400 now that it's out. *drool*

      all sanyo needs is megapixel+ cameras, and bluetooth (especially with something besides just headset mode.. sigh) and they will absolutely rock.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    11. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      Top notch compared to what? A box of raisins? Maybe, but that's pushing it.

      The last two Nokia phones I had were on AT&T and Cellular One (I think it was, was awhlie ago) They sucked.

      I work with every new cellular handset that comes out for Sprint, Nokia's included... and they all suck. Every last one of them. All my co-workers agree as well. We laugh at the poor saps that have to test the Nokias out.

    12. Re:Sprint will destroy Nextel by jnalley · · Score: 1

      Who the fuck is Nitro Wolf???

      I have a Sanyo 8100 and my phone does not have the capability to use SMS text messaging. I have to use a web base email called SHORTMAIL!!!! I have to wait for the massage to be received, and then wait again when I want to open up the message to read its contents, and then again I have to wait to receive information to even reply.

      All of this is through their web. If you had a 8100 two years ago when they were first coming out you would know what I'm talking about.

      "There was no web-based product that was required to be used" That right there is funny! You must be incrediably stupid or just retarted in which case I will tolerate your statment.

  25. Read about Sprint's ReadyLink.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have had commercially viable PTT for about a year.

    But don't worry. Both networks will be maintained for years. You will continue to receive the same service you expect.

    I have been with Sprint since Spectrum/PCS started up in 96.

  26. This would be cool. NOT! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    It would be cool if all telecommunications companies merge into one huge telecommunications company.

    It would be cool if all software companies merge into one huge software company.

    It would be cool if all automobile companies merge into one huge automobile company.

    It would be cool if all toy companies merge into one huge toy company.

    Apply the above four to all other types of industries.

    Then, it would be cool if all the resulting huge companies merge into one really, really, really huge company that does everything. It would be so big that nobody would be able to compete against it.

    And then, that company would purchase the government, and enslave all the people.

  27. Credit Raitings and Cingular? Yeah Right! by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    Early on, AT&T Wireless, Cingular, and TracPhone came out with prepaid cellular. AT&T called their's "Free2Go" and "Prepaid Advantage". I was the latter, because the phone was cooler. This was back in 2000.

    In 2003, AT&T Wireless One upp'ed and brought out the GoPhone service -- Prepaid w/automatic debit. I got the one w/Wireless Internet.

    Now, in 2004, AT&T Cingular are one, and my GoPhone service is little more than a renamed Take Charge service.

    My credit? Shot.

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
  28. Backwards by maukdaddy · · Score: 0

    You have it backwards:

    Sprint serves mostly corporate clients, whereas Nextel serves mostly families and teens.

  29. COOOL! by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

    It's so awesome that two shitty companies have now merged together! The only reason Sprint "Merged" with Nextel, is because Nextel just got 6.5 BILLION dollars in free bandwidth from the FCC to fix their own fuckups! (interfering with emergency frequencies)

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
    1. Re:COOOL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this is not a Nextel fuckup as you might believe! This is a Motorola problem because they can't build a better public safety radio. If cab drivers were to still use the spectrum that Nextel bought from them, public safety would have the same problem. Let's blame the cab drivers now!

  30. Re:Consolidate is expected, plus Nextel Phones roc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes, because iDen == CDMA.

    Oh wait, it doesnt.

  31. Here's how this will work. by s.o.terica · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The reason that Sprint wants Nextel is that Nextel is the network that has best been able to take advantage of the Network Effect, i.e. the effect where each node on a network is made more valuable by each additional node that is added. Nextel has Direct Connect, its walkie-talkie service that is hugely popular with businesses, and the main reason that Nextel has the lowest "churn" rate in the industry. Nextel business customers won't switch to another network because then they won't be able to Direct Connect with other Nextel phones anymore. Period.

    So, Sprint/Qualcomm came up with a competing alternative to Direct Connect called ReadyLink, but it's not anywhere near as useful as Direct Connect because there aren't nearly as many other people who have it.

    So in the short term, what Sprint is going to do is to make changes on the network side to allow Sprint phones to walkie-talkie with Nextel phones. That will effectively instantly make more valuable both Nextel's phones and Sprint's phone.

    In the longer term, Nextel is going to have to move to new spectrum that the FCC has given them due to Nextel phones interfering with emergency vehicle communication. Because of this, they will have to move customers to new phones. So since they have to move their network and swap out their customers' phones anyway, there is no reason that they wouldn't just take the opportunity to move to the significantly more efficient, flexible, and forwards-compatible CDMA 1xRTT (and soon EV-DO high-speed data) standard (that Sprint just happens to run on.

    Bingo. Now it begins to make sense, eh?

    1. Re:Here's how this will work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Qualcomm doesn't have anything to do with ReadyLink. Qualcomm's PTT solution is called QChat, and it happens that Nextel bought an exclusive license to use it in the US. The idea being that Nextel would switch to QChat (probably branding it as Direct Connect) when (if?) they switch their network from iDEN to CDMA.

      More information

    2. Re:Here's how this will work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You nailed it.

      Nextel was going to have to swap out EVERY phone in the next few years. Everybody afraid of that happening because of the merger needs to understand that they will have to swap phones anyway. There is no way around it merger or no merger.

      Where is Nextel going? Into the bands now used by Sprint. It makes total sense to join with Sprint who already owns towers and infrastructure and backend so they have a place to move their users, and Sprint is now offering their PTT feature so that was the direction they were headed.

      Both companies were converging on the same thing anyway. Merging just makes sense.

  32. HORSE SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sprint basically picks up the leftovers that VZW & Cingular don't want (those with iffy credit ratings ...)

    Try again. You are referring to Clear Pay, a pay-as-you-go style program promoted 3 years ago by "previous management." Yes, this program clearly was an attempt to inflate the total number of "Gross Ads," a measurement of added subscribers over time, which for good or bad is used as a key indicator (along with other indicators like COH and ARPU) by Wall Street to evaluate the carriers.

    It *did* achieve its intended short term goal... gross ads ballooned, however many folks were deadbeats. The program has been reduced to a near halt.

    I love how everyone loves to dog on PCS. The fact is, their customer care is pretty weak. They outsource it to some real boners. But their engineering is fairly top notch. Know how I know? I have worked with their network architects and engineers for 20 years.

    You ever wonder why Verizon uses CDMA? Think for a moment about when they entered the game, and the technology that Sprint had (and still has) in operation at the time. CLICK! Did everybody hear that?? Yes! That was the realization that the core Verizon service in major coverage areas is largley delivered over Sprint PCS's towers, lines and network!

    So is Virgin Mobile's! ALL OF IT.

    Same with Qwest wireless! ALL OF IT.

    These carriers differentiate themselves through market segmentation, customer care, plan and service bundling, and yes, price.

    You would think that as detached Slash-dottian engineers, we could be a bit more immune to the marketing and hype, and recognize the physical truths of the system.

    1. Re:HORSE SHIT by nbvb · · Score: 1

      You are so wrong, it's not funny.

      Virgin Mobile, yes, Qwest, yes, VZW, wrong.

      Sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but VZW owns their own switches. Just how it goes.

      Towers, yes, they probably rent space from Sprint since they divested the towers, but so what? So does everyone else.

  33. there *is* something around the corner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... most people don't know that Nextel Broadband [http://www.nextelbroadband.net] uses the *new* iDEN spectrum and employs the Flarion Flash-OFDM technology [http://www.flarion.com] .

    The Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill NC test market has been 'live' for a year or so, and I am a customer since this past spring. VERY good!! I can surf at 80 MPH. And it's even easier when somebody else is driving ;-) /.'ers should know that this merger simply accelerates this service's availability.

    Also, Sprint's tower spacing is better "tuned" for the common frequencies they will end up sharing, and in 90% of cases they are already co-located. The merger will incent them to put up new sites, which is the problem they have now, insufficient critical mass to support the coverage rollout both desperately need.

    My only question is how the Nextel side will incent their users to ditch their old phones and move to the new band. The already-in-the-works spectrum swap requires it, so, I just figure people will be given either new phones or a subsidy that allows them to get either a free cheap new model or a big credut to a more feature-rich 1900MHz model.

  34. Where is the money coming from? by matth · · Score: 1

    My understanding was Sprint was coming close to bankrupt in their wireless division? I know personally here where I live in Williamsport, PA Sprint closed down their store, as well as stopped construction on a tower in the area because they said they ran out of funds.... how are they affording to purchase Nextel?

    1. Re:Where is the money coming from? by Secrity · · Score: 1

      Why do you say that you understand that Sprint ran out of funds? Have you checked Sprint's financials lately? Have you looked at the financials involved in the potential merger? Your understanding in this matter is very worthless.

    2. Re:Where is the money coming from? by s.o.terica · · Score: 1

      Affiliate area. Probably Horizon Wireless, which filed for bankruptcy a year ago

    3. Re:Where is the money coming from? by Jyvin · · Score: 1

      YOU ARE DUMB! Sprint's wireless group accounted for more than half of last quarters earnings for the company. Sprint PCS is in a huge growth mode. Earlier in the week they signed 3 billion in new contracts to expand out and add to the network. Work in a little research to avoid embarrassing yourself in the future!

    4. Re:Where is the money coming from? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally I would love to see sprint go out of business. I used them for one year and it was the absolute worse service ever. Made the change to Nextel and it's been great. I don't mind spending a little bit extra either. The news that they might be merging is disheartening indeed.

    5. Re:Where is the money coming from? by matth · · Score: 1

      Yes indeed that is who it was.. horizon wireless...

    6. Re:Where is the money coming from? by matth · · Score: 1

      Ditto... they seem to think people only want to use their phones on the interstate!!! ack... Verizon is whom I'm with now and it works mostly everywhere.

    7. Re:Where is the money coming from? by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      While I detest Sprint, the events you mention are very likely not connected to Sprint in any way. Sprint stores are all owned by local small businessmen who re-sell Sprint service. Sprint does not own the store in Williamsport. Further, most cell phone towers are not owned by cell phone companies. They are sited, built, and maintained by independent companies like Crown Castle who rent space on their towers to cell phone companies. It's one of the reasons you may see three or four sets of cell phone antennae on a single mast -- they're leasing space to more than one company. From where do you get your "understanding?"

    8. Re:Where is the money coming from? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      There's a couple places at the mall that still sell SprintPCS service, isn't there?

      I coulda sworn the store just moved from the TJ Maxx plaza to somewhere else (where, I dunno), I didn't know it had clased.

    9. Re:Where is the money coming from? by matth · · Score: 1

      Nope they closed up... there was a notice on the store window for several months (may still be there) that said the closest store for service (it didn't say that.. those are my words) was in Scranton! yeah right.. like I'm going to drive to Scranton to get my phone services...

      It basically said... to serve you better, we have closed this store to cut costs. You can still find us at blah blah in Scranton.

      Hey.. does this mean there is another Williamsportite on here? :)

    10. Re:Where is the money coming from? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Yep. Born and raised. Escaped to State College for a while, but driving all the way back to Billtown for work every day got old. State College is a MUCH more entertaining area.

      I've done about all there is to do in Williamsport. Seen the inside of the Williamsport Police station, and unfortunately seen the State Police barracks from the inside in leg irons shackled to the wall. I've definately got the Home of Little League figured out. :P

  35. And I still don't have a cell phone. by PrintError · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    And I don't want one.

  36. Link Nextel PTT with Sprint PTT (ReadyLink)? by chamilto0516 · · Score: 1
    I wonder where linking Nextel PTT with Sprint's PTT (called ReadyLink) falls in the merger plan. I got one of those ReadlyLink phones as a replacement and from what I can tell, I'm the only one with one. I have had it for 4 months now and have been unable to find someone with it to even test the silly service/technology.

    What did I expect, it is only available to people if they purchase one of only 4 Sanyo phones.

    --
    Magic Eight Ball: Outlook not so good., Hmmm, how about Excel and Word?
    1. Re:Link Nextel PTT with Sprint PTT (ReadyLink)? by davie · · Score: 1

      Samsung is adding Ready Link to its line. If I remember correctly, the SPH-a760 will be the first device to include the feature.

      --
      slashdot broke my sig
    2. Re:Link Nextel PTT with Sprint PTT (ReadyLink)? by s.o.terica · · Score: 1

      Sprint will make Nextel Direct Connect (using iDEN) seamless with ReadyLink (using CDMA 1xRTT), then eventually move all Nextel customers over to CDMA. iDEN is a technological dead-end used by virtually no one other than Nextel.

    3. Re:Link Nextel PTT with Sprint PTT (ReadyLink)? by XO · · Score: 1

      But, the Sanyo phones account for more than 50% of all Sprint handset sales since the addition of the ReadyLink service. Hell, I personally sold over 100 ReadyLink phones specifically to people who wanted to be able to "chirp", within a week of it's release. And the clip of selling ReadyLink capable phones has NOT slowed down one bit.

      "chirp" is a feature that all the kids want now.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  37. Re:Credit Raitings and Cingular? Yeah Right! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    I don't understand, are you saying the phone service killed your credit rating, or that your credit rating prevented you from getting a contract plan in the first place?

  38. This just in: by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

    Man doesn't have cell phone, and insists on telling people.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. Re:All these mergers and one that I wish would hap by g0hare · · Score: 1

    That's because ALlltel has COVERAGE, baby! Nextel does not have it.

    --
    Vote Quimby!
  40. Nextel, NASCAR? by trevor_hellman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This seems odd as Nextel just made a huge commitment to NASCAR. I think it was a 10 year contract to sponsor their top Cup division. In addition, they must have spent a ton this year alone branding their name on the NASCAR circuit. Why would Sprint want anything to do with that?

    Trevor

    1. Re:Nextel, NASCAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if they would then spend the money renaming the nextel cup series again, I doubt it. I know many racing fans were skeptical on how nextel would handle their first year as the Cup sponsor, but I think they performed very well

    2. Re:Nextel, NASCAR? by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just a quick FYI, but outside of the blue states NASCAR is one of the most popular activities in the area. While the millions of people who enjoy the store may not mean a hill of beans to you, they are generally the target market for NEXTEL (who happens to have the highest fees and lowest churn in the industry) so they must be doing something at least a little bit right. Also they are almost as profitable (per sub) as Verizon (who carries a tremendous advantage because of its size).

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    3. Re:Nextel, NASCAR? by qqaz · · Score: 1

      hahahaha, what is there to worry about how a SPONSER performs? "oh wow, Nextel sure did a great job of plastering their logo on Dale Earnhart's car! What a great color scheme choice!"

      --
      sup :cool:
    4. Re:Nextel, NASCAR? by UrlorJkron · · Score: 1

      Sprint has previously bought sponsership in NASCAR. Adam Petty was sponsored by Sprint until he died in practice at Martinsville Speedway. His father Kyle Petty then drove with Adam's team with Sprint sponsorship for about two years. Kyle is now sponsored Georgia-Pacific.

      Having your name on the sport gets much more screen time than having just a driver. I forsee a "Sprint-Nextel Cup" if the merger comes through.

      --
      The public will believe anything, so long as it is not founded on truth. --Edith Sitwell
    5. Re:Nextel, NASCAR? by UrlorJkron · · Score: 1
      The division was still called the Winston Cup when Dale Earnhart was racing. Also they only put a small sticker on the car you can't really see unless you're close to the car.

      Sponsering the class is all about getting you company mentioned any time the sport is brought up.

      As for driver sponsorship: http://www.nascar.com/2004/kyn/nascar_101/05/20/te am_costs/index.html

      --
      The public will believe anything, so long as it is not founded on truth. --Edith Sitwell
    6. Re:Nextel, NASCAR? by pgfault · · Score: 1

      Minor correction, Adam Petty was killed in turn 3 during practice at New Hampshire International Speedway in Loudon. Kenny Irwin also died at this track a couple months later in a similar crash (throttle hung at 160mph, hello wall).

      For the pertinent stuff, all we need now is for R.J. Reynolds to purchase Sprint and the circle will be complete. We'll once again have the Winston Cup and metastable equilibrium will have returned.

      Of course, for true world peace, the Colts would have to move back to Baltimore, the Rams to LA, the Cardinals to StL, and the Lakers to Minneapolis.

    7. Re:Nextel, NASCAR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that would be Cardinals to Chicago and Rams to Cleveland to have them in their original cities.

    8. Re:Nextel, NASCAR? by XO · · Score: 1

      And the Expos back to Montreal, and the Dodgers back to Brooklyn, and the Astros back to Washington.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  41. Re:capitalism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Criticize capitalism with compelling details, and you're "baiting flames":

    Moderation -2
    50% Flamebait
    50% Overrated

    Flame a critic, and you're probably "Insightful". If I believed the telcos had their acts together, I'd probably think these mods were astroturf.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  42. Sprint appeals to families and teens?? by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

    Around here (suburban NY) all the families and teens have Nextel (ugh) because the PTT feature caught on. So when I walk around at school between classes all I hear is "BLEEP yo what up my homie?" Not very many people I know have Sprint. I'd say the most popular carriers used in this area are Verizon, Nextel, and Cingular.

    --
    Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
    1. Re:Sprint appeals to families and teens?? by TheUnknownOne · · Score: 1

      (also living in suburban NY) The best part about Nextel is their wonderful sound quality. I mean, when people use that PTT feature in a public place almost everyone can hear the garbage coming through the other end (usually sounds like a burst of static followed by something similar to someone talking with a microphone in his/her mouth.)

    2. Re:Sprint appeals to families and teens?? by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      That and Motorola's oh-so-wonderful bleep sound and the huge speakers they put into the iDEN phones so you can hear it from 100 feet away!

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
  43. NYT had an interesting tidbit on this - by caveat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    From their article a few days ago on these talks (their current cover story omits this info):
    A deal could be reached as early as next week if the talks continue apace. In the meantime, the talks may bring to the game a third player, Verizon Wireless, which held several internal conference calls yesterday to discuss the possibility of making a run at Sprint, executives close to Verizon Wireless said.
    If you think Sprint-Nextel would be a bloody mess, just try and imagine Sprint-Verizon...ow, my head...
    --

    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley
    1. Re:NYT had an interesting tidbit on this - by CallFinalClass · · Score: 1

      Sprint-Verizon actually would work out much much better, as they both use CDMA. I'm sure Verizon would buy out Sprint - those "mergers as equals" don't tend to work out all that well overall.

    2. Re:NYT had an interesting tidbit on this - by Nameles · · Score: 1

      In a perfect world, it'd be awesome:

      I'd have my nice "call any Verizon customer, anytime, anyplace, free" combined with DirectConnect and cool Nextel phones...

    3. Re:NYT had an interesting tidbit on this - by thule · · Score: 1

      As soon as I heard about the AT&T/Cingular merger I wondered if this ment that Verizon would buy SprintPCS within 2-3 years. Just like AT&T and Cingular both use GSM, Verizon and SprintPCS use CDMA. What would be really interesting is if Nextel, SprintPCS, and Verizon merged. What would Cingular think? :)

  44. Re:Consolidate is expected, plus Nextel Phones roc by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    There's really no such thing as an unlocked Nextel phone. Nextel is the exclusive provider of iDEN phones in the United States. I guess you could take your "unlocked" phone to canada and try to get Telus service but I heard they don't allow outside iDEN phones on their network.

  45. Which is a durable cell phone to get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I abuse my handsets a lot and they never last too long. Any suggestion on a tough durable handset?

    1. Re:Which is a durable cell phone to get? by rxmd · · Score: 1
      I've been using a Nokia 5140 for some time (I'm a GSM user). While it comes a lot of unnecessary gadgets such as the compass and flashlight, it's definitely rugged. It can take a good beating and it's fairly waterproof. I've been using mine in temperatures between plus forty and minus thirty (Centigrade), it has survived a couple of drops up to about ten feet, as well as being submerged in water for a couple of minutes. I guess if you don't want to go for a special ruggedized solution, it's the best rugged brand model you can get so far. It doesn't win beauty contests, though, the blue version is OK, but the red one is butt-ugly.

      My sister uses one, too. She spends a lot of time out in the open (she's a biologist doing environmental science), and she recommends it as well.

      --
      As a state gets corrupt, its laws multiply; the most corrupt states have the most numerous laws. (Tacitus, Annales 3:27)
    2. Re:Which is a durable cell phone to get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not available in the USA yet.

    3. Re:Which is a durable cell phone to get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. I'm in Europe.

  46. Re:capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would all be wonderful. Except the very content of your post is the exact opposite of the heading of yoru post. So your either a troll or a idiot. In the event that you are the later, the very nature of capitalism coupled with greedy investors will not allow companies to reduce their profits. Reduced profits = lower price per share. People do not see beyond the end of their nose in regards to investing anymore. We had a correction to balance out the madness of the dot bomb era. But we are yet to have the correction to balance out the complete polar opposite (which again, was the manifestation of the correction itself). Once we reach the corrections correction, then what you are talking about is possible because shareholders will tolerate strategy. But they refuse to do so right now. They will only tolerate quarter after quarter of consecutive growth AND profit. And really, that is the case because investors lost so much money previously. They still haven't recovered in many cases. If anything, I think the market is worse this year than it was in 03. You are a typical dumb ass Republican.

  47. Re:Credit Raitings and Cingular? Yeah Right! by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1


    No, he's saying he was dumb enough to do anything automatic-debit. Giving any company access to a checking account for anything but deposits is just insanely stupid. It is not convenient--it is downright stupid. Why? Because they make mistakes. Where is your money? They have it. How to get it back? Sue us. Suddenly $0.37 for a stamp doesn't look so bad.

    --
    -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  48. Re:I don't know how it is in the rest of the world by Ark42 · · Score: 1


    Nextel offers the best service for me as well (Michigan). I can get service in the middle of lakes near Coldwater where my other various uncles/grandparents/etc cannot get a signal at all. The walkie-talkie feature is by far the best with Nextel. The only bad thing about Nextel really is the ticking noise you near in nearby unshielded speakers even when you aren't using the phone. If anything remotely changes for the worst, I will absolutely be cancelling my service, because I really do not want to be paying Sprint any money. They have horrible customer service and this deal is most likely going to be very terrible for Nextel. I'm not sure who is left after all these mergers, but I certainly wouldn't want to pick up a Verizon phone it its place.

  49. Re:capitalism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    You are an idiot, Anonymous illiterate Coward. What is the opposite of "capitalism"? Maybe "communism", maybe nothing. Surely a criticism of capitalism is appropriately titled "capitalism".

    Then you go on to say "Reduced profits = lower price per share", which is, of course, not true except in economics theory - due to speculation. Which you then decry yourself in your following sentences. You can't even read your own post for sensibility!

    By the end of your ramble, you've drifted so far from your brief connection to my post that you're babbling about market performance, as if I claimed it was increasing, when I didn't even mention it. You then outdo yourself by calling me a "Republican", though that has no basis in fact, in my post, or in any way whatsoever.

    You are one of the stupidest Anonymous Cowards I've yet seen responding to my posts who can still spell. So your stupidity isn't pure incompetence - you are willfully stupid, and beyond hope. Keep your gibberish away from my posts, or get turned out as a fool again, Anonymous idiot Coward.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  50. Re:capitalism by mrm677 · · Score: 1

    You are between the ages of 18-25 for sure.

    It shows on how naive and smart you think you are.

  51. Re:I don't know how it is in the rest of the world by SaDan · · Score: 1

    I have to carry a Nextel phone for work, and I absolutely HATE this thing.

    The phones are huge, have cruddy battery life, and service (Chicago suburbs & downtown) is horrific. Constant interruptions, lost signal on almost every call, poor voice quality, you name it. I cannot believe they are still in business, at least around here.

    If I travel anywhere away from a MAJOR road in Indiana, I have no signal. It's not the phone either, I've already had it checked.

    Sprint and Nextel... It'll be a match made in hell.

  52. Sure! Diversity will solve the structural problems by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    could be overcome by the diversity of the company's clients

    I swear I hear one more thing about diversity overcoming problems, I'll wring someone's neck.

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  53. Nextel by sulphurlad · · Score: 0

    I can't stand nextel, and I am a Plumber, I've used nextel since they first came out with the 10 lbs bricks that were their 1st phones. In my area they oversold the towers and connection blows, hell I spent 1/2 a day 3 months ago waiting for to get connected to system, full signal and all. And their so called cutomer service, whatever..... yeah they are real nice when you sign up, but when you have an issue with a bill.... that's another story. I pay the bills for a plumbing company and for 10 phones we were paying like $1,400.00 a month..... A MONTH!!!! Screw that, and every time that we needed a new phone because of whatever, like the day a guy dropped his in the porta-potty, 2 Year contract to get a new one..... No, they would not replace it, I had to buy a new one with a New 2 year contract. Whatever, they call themselves the bussiness company.... well that might be true, but not my bussiness.

    I went with T-mobile, good bussiness division, no Bullshit... I get what I want now, 20 phones @ Half the cost, better service.

    And no more of that embarrasing crap, that beep, then a guy rambleing on that you cannot interupt because it's a one way conversation till he's done yakking. or worse yet, that beep, one of my guys asking "what the fuck is going on with so and so" while I'm in a meeting with people or a woman's present.

    Bottom line, Nextel 2 way is only conveniate for the person calling, Not the person that has to answer!!!

    And Sprint..... Man FUBAR all the way around, wife had them as her cell phone provider for 2 years, never had a correct bill from them, neet had good service, don't bother leaving a voice mail, Mailing a letter would get to her faster.

    Hell I had them for my home phone service till they came out with VOIP, Man that was a Glorious day.....I loved taking Bolt Cutters to that box on the side of my house.... Left them with bear cables exposed to the weather, hehehehehehehe.

  54. Damnit, The first thing to go is competition by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

    I just got my nextel, the beauty of the thing is It's got unlimited incoming calls. I can bet the first thing to go will be that service.

  55. Teens like Nextel even more than they like Sprint by jessecurry · · Score: 1

    I just wanted to let you know that on the west coast of Florida(Tampa/Sarasota) teens like Nextel even more than sprint. The direct connect feature doesn't use minutes and is a quicker way to get ahold of someone than have to (gasp!) dial their number and wait for them to answer.

    I've actually noticed that almost anyone who has to keep in touch with a large number of people on a budget is switching to Nextel, it's true that they are a little more pricey, but the direct connect saves the users from overage charges.

    I can only assume that as more people make the switch Nextel will become a more attractive option.

    --
    Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
  56. Cool by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

    I haven't a clue how they're going to get around the CDMA/GSM issues, but the truth of the matter is that Sprint has gotten about a million times better about their biggest complaints in the last year. Those were wrong bills and coverage. Now, well, I've had my Sprint phone for well over 4 months and never had a wrong bill, and never dropped a call or been in a place without coverage that didn't make sense (i.e. a tunnel). I don't know much about Nextel, except people use their Walkie-Talkie feature a lot. Sprint has that too, so...

    --
    --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
  57. Diversity solves monopoly problems. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    In this case, that diversity talk is a nonsensical lie broadcast to the harshest critics of monopoly to lull them into complacency. In general, though, the alternative to monopoly is diversity, the kind of plurality that survives surprise crises through a multiplicity of reactions. Which is why, when the diversity is relevant to the structure, it is reassuring to critics of monopoly. Which, in turn, is why this telco merger is using its style, though its substance is false.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  58. Re:Credit Raitings and Cingular? Yeah Right! by sarlen · · Score: 1
    Now, in 2004, AT&T Cingular are one, and my GoPhone service is little more than a renamed Take Charge service.

    As far as prepaid is concerned you'll never find a better service than GoPhone as far as minutes are concerned and available features. Infact, GoPhone was SO tremendously popular it caused AT&T Wireless's selling in an indirect way. They had been testing a new GSM customer care system because they knew the current rendition of Siebel could not handle much more than their current GSM subscribers - it wasn't fully tested and suddenly GoPhone popped on the scene and they had to push it out. This resulted in nearly 3 months of lost activations, and consquently ATTWS's buyout.

    Fyi tho, Cingular intends on keeping the GoPhone the way it is I do believe.

  59. Re:I don't know how it is in the rest of the world by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

    A couple of months ago, the company I work for switched all the staff phones from Cingular to Nextel, and we've had nothing but problems in the Chicago area. Dropped calls. Garbled speech. And more often than not, we can't reach these people at all. They all have to carry a pager so we can page them to let them know we can't reach them on their Nextels. Disaster.

  60. greater detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/business/article.adp?id =20041210203609990007

    Sprint-Nextel deal talk sparks vendor concern
    By Sinead Carew, Reuters

    NEW YORK, Dec 10 (Reuters) - The prospect of a deal between Sprint and Nextel Communications sparked concerns on Friday about a shrinking U.S. market for mobile network equipment, sending shares of Nextel's key supplier Motorola Inc. down almost 8 percent.

    Sprint Corp. is in advanced negotiations to buy Nextel Communications Inc. for more than $36 billion in a mostly stock deal that would combine the No. 3 and No. 5 U.S. mobile providers, according to sources familiar with the deal.

    Motorola is the sole network supplier and the main handset supplier to Nextel, and analysts say it has the most to lose as the industry shrinks to four main service providers.

    If Sprint and Nextel merge they are expected to operate Nextel's Motorola-based network for another several years but choose technology Sprint uses for future networks.

    "Motorola would certainly get a piece of that business on the infrastructure and the handset side but one, it would be a more competitive market so the margins are lower, and two, they would be sharing it," said Deutsche Bank analyst Brian Modoff, who has a "hold" rating on Motorola shares.

    Sprint runs a network on standard technology known as CDMA and has plans to start using a faster version next year. Nextel uses Motorola's proprietary iDen technology.

    Motorola's President and Chief Operating Officer Mike Zafirovski told an investor conference in San Francisco on Friday that he was confident Nextel would continue to use the Motorola technology known as iDen for the next 2-3 years.

    Analysts believe Sprint needs to keep Nextel's network running for several years because Nextel's walkie-talkie style Push-to-Talk feature has a strong following among Nextel's lucrative and loyal business customer base.

    CHALLENGES AHEAD FOR MOTOROLA

    Nextel has been testing a high-speed technology from a private company called Flarion Technologies. But a Sprint deal would likely mean it does not end up using this technology, at least in the near term, several analysts have said.

    Sprint will most likely instead migrate Nextel's customers to CDMA, said Legg Mason analyst Christopher King who believes the pair can save about $2 billion in the next few years by building a CDMA based network for high-speed mobile services.

    In the meantime Charter Equity Research analyst Ed Snyder said Motorola is likely to lose out on the equipment side but could win some new business at Sprint by building phones that will work on both the CDMA and iDen networks.

    Motorola, the U.S. market leader among handset makers, has been struggling to win back Sprint as a handset customer after being displaced by rivals, including Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. , in recent years.

    Sprint currently uses network gear from Lucent Technologies Inc. , Nortel Networks and to a lesser extent Motorola. A Nextel-Sprint deal could mean more business for Lucent and Nortel.

    "In terms of impact on specific vendors. If they combined and went with CDMA that's an incremental positive for Nortel and Lucent and an incremental negative for Motorola," said Tim Daubenspeck of Pacific Crest Securities.

    But the mobile network gear industry as a whole will find itself fighting harder for orders from a smaller group of bigger U.S. providers, he said. European countries already only have about three or four large mobile providers each.

    Ericsson , the world's biggest mobile network gear maker, recently blamed U.S. consolidation for declining sales. One of its biggest customers, Cingular Wireless , bought another client, AT&T Wireless, in October, shrinking the U.S. market to five national providers.

    Daubenspeck said consolidation among service providers could force a merger spree in the

  61. Re:I don't know how it is in the rest of the world by Ark42 · · Score: 1


    The phones aren't *huge* but they aren't as unusably tiny as some others you can get from other providers, no. What do you want? Phones you can accidently swallow (queue futurama reference)?
    I don't think I've ever gotten a dropped call or reception bad enough that I couldn't hear the other person. Its really good for the rural areas too, I think Nextel has the furthest reaching signals and from what I understand, their real big with the farmers. Sprint and Nextel is still a match made in hell though, but its really Sprint I am not looking forward to.

  62. Re:Credit Raitings and Cingular? Yeah Right! by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

    This happened to me once. State Farm Insurance did the automatic-debt thing anyway two months after I had cancelled it. They ended up bouncing my rent check for me. Gee, thanks.

    To their credit, with a couple of days, State Farm had put the money back, plus my bounced check charges and late rent penalty. They even faxed a letter to my landlord saying it was all their fault. But still, it shouldn't have happened in the first place.

  63. Verizon to buy Sprint, kill Nextel by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Nextel was going to be to the next great thing when it was rolled out a decade ago. They suffered from the "We have better technology ergo we don't have to do anything else" syndrome. I can't really understand why Sprint would want to pay that much for Nextel's clients. In either case Verizon should buy Sprint and hopefully increase and improve Sprint's coverage area which is the worst of the major cell players. I am a Sprint customer and I experience digital roaming practically everywhere I go.

  64. Re:Consolidate is expected, plus Nextel Phones roc by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 1

    I actually just got back from Nextel's developer conference (Miami Beach!! Beats the heck out of New York)...and yes. You can control pretty much all the aspects of the i860 via the interfaces in the J2ME dev kit. They've provided access to everything, including the call APIs. You should be able to get dev stuff from Nextel or Motorola's iDEN site.

    It's a pretty nice phone to. You're supposed to be able to activate download apps via an iFUN transaction (buying a J2ME app via the wap deck, as from cellmania, for example) and not having to open the download apps J2ME app manually, but I haven't seen that operate yet.

    Look out for the i930 thought -- it's an MS "smartphone"

    Looks like crap.

  65. Teens like to connect instantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It only *seems* like PTT is faster to connect than a cell phone. You still have to scroll through your phone book, push the button on the side (instead of the one with the phone on it), and then wait for the system to actually connect to the other phone. Nextel's "get right through" ads are complete crap. The other phone might be in a bad reception spot, it might be off, it might be busy, and the other person can still ignore your call. It's no different from a regular phone! The only differences to the user are the cost (cheap) and the fact that no one bothers to turn off the speaker for conversations in public areas (annoying).

    *Please wait while the NEXTEL subscriber you are trying to reach is located...*

  66. Well, there goes the neighborhood by Cleetus+Freem · · Score: 1

    Sprint. I remember them well. They provided my long distance and cell for a year. That year will go down in my memory as 365 days of Sprint pooping on me.

    Without gettng into the gory details (heck the poop reference was gore enough) of lousy customer service, poor cellular coverage, overbilling, etc. I will present you with the straw (assuming straws weigh several tons and are made of steel) that broke this camel's back.

    My wife was in Macau for a week. When I called her I somehow missdialed or simply forgot to dial the access code we normally used for long distance. The call was thus carried by my normal long distance provider, Sprint. We spoke for about 45 minutes.

    When the next phone bill came we found that Sprint charged us over $4 per minute! After my wife pried me off of the ceiling, sedated me and cleaned the angry froth off my chin, I called to complain. The call went no where so I spoke to a manager who promptly suggested that I had been calling a phone sex line! (The nerve! Why would I pay for phone sex when there is so much free pr0n on the web?) The number went to a university in Macau for crying out loud! They could easily see/check that.

    In the end, they refused to cut the bill at all and I dropped Sprint, vowed never to use them again and promised to do what I am doing here. Spread the word. Oh, and to get back on topic, I guess I won't be using Nextel either, now.

    1. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in other words, if you had dialed the code you were supposed to use you wouldn't have been charged so much? Personally I'd be mad at myself instead of trying to pin the blame on someone else.

    2. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Cleetus+Freem · · Score: 1

      But I was a VICTIM!! You can't blame me!!!....LOL, kidding... Seriously, you are right, I was almost as pissed at myself as my wife was.

      My own stupidity is a known quantity to me, however. My beef is, in part, that Sprint was perfectly happy to charge a rate that was so high it was extortion and they were unwilling to work with me. My MAJORbeef was that they implied I was calling a phone sex line and, joking about pr0n aside, that is something I find very offensive (and something they could have verified was not true).

      Thus, they lost a customer AND get to share the blame with me! :)

    3. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by sanityspeech · · Score: 1

      Sprint. The bane of my existence. I recently discovered that I have developed an allergy to incompetence, thanks in no small part to customer service provided by Sprint.

      I got my first wireless phone in 1999, which was locked in with Sprint. In 2002, I upgraded to the Treo 300. Prior to the upgrade, I had no need to call Sprint customer service for assistance. However, the Treo repeatedly crashed, causing me to lose what data was stored on the device.

      Whenever I tried to call customer service for assistance, I was directed to an automated system which "screened out" customers before they could talk with a live person. I would be trapped in a "press button number..." maze for minutes. I guess the most annoying part of the ordeal was that the automated system used a pathetic speech recognition system. Nice.

      This, coupled with a poor coverage area (Washington, DC - imagine that!) made the decision to switch to Verizon very easy for me. Oh, I also decided to abandon the Treo product line. Based on recent news reports, this seems to have been a smart move on my part.

      My brother uses Nextel (he has for years) and I wonder what will happen when he realizes that the quality service he is familiar with has become tainted by one of the more incompetent vendors around.

      What more can I say?? Live and Learn, live and learn.

    4. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by XO · · Score: 1

      International calls often have excess surcharges billed to them by carriers in the middle.. and I don't know what the country code to the area you were calling is, but I bet it's used predominantly by phone sex operators...

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    5. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Cleetus+Freem · · Score: 1

      It was 853 (Macau). The call was to a number at the University of Macau. A normal, easily accessible rate for Macau, at the time, was 15 cents per minute.

      Sprint charging me over $4 per minute was criminal, in my opinion. Yes I screwed up by not dialing properly but Sprint charging me so much per minute was ridiculous.

      Anyone going with Sprint should just be aware that they aren't a customer friendly organization.

    6. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by XO · · Score: 1

      is that a direct dial from the U.S., or does it have to be done with country code? (ie, does it use the ten-digit US convention?) A ton of those numbers ,even ones with legit purposes, are actually billed by phone sex ops...

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
    7. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Cleetus+Freem · · Score: 1

      You have to dial the usual 011 to get out of the States then the country code and then a city code (although Macau doesn't have a city code), then the actual number.

      No matter, it was poor customer relations to claim I was calling phone sex. Especially when it was really Sprint themselves who were doing the charging. Also, over $4 dollars a minute! Shouldn't that be illegal? Oh well, I learned my lesson and will forever avoid Sprint.

    8. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are not capable to operate the technology correctly maybe you should not use it. It is way to often we make errors and request others to make concessions for them. Companies pay for the rights to give you these services. If you screw up you need to pay. I am sure nextel and Sprint would not want a customer of your magnitude as part of there organization. They get tired of hearing from people whining about the bills they jack up.

    9. Re:Well, there goes the neighborhood by Cleetus+Freem · · Score: 1

      LOL... you seem a tad thick in the head my friend. Let me broaden the argument a bit so you can see past your over simplifications. If they can charge me over $4 a minute for my stupid mistake, I think I should be allowed to charge them every time they over-billed me. Say, 15% of the overage. I should also be allowed to charge them, say, $4 a minute, for the time I had to waste hanging on the phone waiting for customer service to fix their ignorant billing mistakes. Given the number of mistakes they made (always in their favor, of course) they would have been paying me to use their service. Unfortunately, I cannot do any of this. I can, however, complain. Thus my posts here. Until they are willing to pay up for their own stupidity, why should I have to pay for mine? Let me turn your own words around on you... If they screw up they need to pay. We get tired of dealing with simple minded customer service hacks. Next time, boy, think before you post.

  67. Re:All these mergers and one that I wish would hap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And once this monopoly kills the competition, they will have no need to have free InNetwork...

  68. Re:I don't know how it is in the rest of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nextel in Argentina is Nextel International. They are no longer affiliated with Nextel as of a few years ago.

  69. Re:I don't know how it is in the rest of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither nextel or sprint offer the best service here (Kansas City)...It's odd too that sprints world headquarters is here (Kansas City) and you only have to travel a few miles outside the city and you have no service. Can't say as I've ever been too keen on Sprint. Seems as though the only news I ever hear about them is that they are laying people off.

  70. I Think You're Mistaken by c_spencer100 · · Score: 1

    I transfer Sprint phones all the time, not only for myself (I broke 2 phones in the last 2 months) but for family members as well. Not only do they do it for free over the phone, I've walked in a Radio Shack and a Sprint store and had them do it for free there as well - and I didn't even buy the phone from the Sprint store. The $35 fee that you speak of applies only to activating a new service, not a new phone.

    1. Re:I Think You're Mistaken by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


      Well, I have not transfered a phone for almost 2 years now, but previous to that I have done it twice. And I am 100% sure that the $35 is not for new service only. Even when the replacement phone was an "equipment replacement" phone that I got for free when my first phone died, I had to pay the $35 fee. It is in the equipment replacement contract that I had.

      That said, I have not done it for a couple years so it may be different now. It sure seems silly to charge an existing customer to switch phones...I mean where has the term "valued customer" gone?

    2. Re:I Think You're Mistaken by JustinHoMi · · Score: 1

      Sprint hasn't charged for ESN swaps for at least the last year.

  71. Re:Credit Raitings and Cingular? Yeah Right! by upsidedown_duck · · Score: 1

    To their credit, with a couple of days, State Farm had put the money back,...

    Yes, this is to their credit, but I can imagine plenty of companies who will just hold on to the money. For example, my old cell phone company kept billing me for months after cancellation--I dread what would have happened if they got the money directly (I think this is actually part of their business model). I'm sure getting the money back from a hospital or nursing home would be like squeezing blood out of a rock. Add lawyer consultation and exhaustion from arguing, and automatic-debit just isn't worth it.

    --
    -- "Makes Little Debbie look like a pile of puke!" - Moe Szyslak
  72. "Nextel...straight outta Compton??!?!?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not too crazy about Nextel's recent advertising campaigns for their PTT service,
    and I wonder if it might have hurt business sales
    to those who want to use it as a serious service,
    instead of mindless prattle.

  73. Rogue ad agency...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    From the article:

    In a letter to Abraham H. Foxman, ADL National Director, the wireless communications company said it was seeking to end its relationship with Syntech, an authorized independent dealer based in Makati City, the Philippines. Nextel has filed for a temporary restraining order against Syntech, charging the dealer had created the "vile and offensive" sales brochure without its knowledge or consent.

    "To say we are outraged and dismayed by Syntech's conduct is an understatement," Lo van Gemert, President of Nextel International, stated in a letter to Mr. Foxman. "You have our sincerest apology for this most unfortunate and regrettable transgression on the part of one of our dealers."

    Anyone with just a few functioning braincells
    knows this would be suicide to pull a stunt
    like this.

  74. Re:Consolidate is expected, plus Nextel Phones roc by Syre · · Score: 1

    Actually, all you have to do is to call Nextel and say you want international accesss, and your Nextel phone will work fine in Canada. I just got back from Vancouver/Victoria and everything worked fine, even the internet!

    It will also work in various parts of Latin America and a few other places.

  75. Re:Credit Raitings and Cingular? Yeah Right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been on prepay service for something like 8 years. Why? All the marketing reasons they claim, and I have no credit. No debt either.

    Went with Powertel initially because they were GSM and had first minute free on incoming calls. I got VERY good at having :50 conversations.

    Then Powertel got bought by VoiceStream who was in turn gobbled up by T-Mobile. So now T-Mobile is my carrier. This is good and bad. Good because I now have national roaming for free. Bad because T-mobile has only recently gotten a grip on how to handle prepay. For a long time, they sort of denied that they even had such a product and denied prepay users any of the niceties offered to the billed customers. I got the feeling they would rather not have prepay at all except VoiceStream and Powertel had a ton of people using it and spending lots of money so T-Mobile would have been stupid to get rid of it.

    So now they have it sorted out so you can refill airtime over the phone with a credit/debit card and that takes all the hassle away. I've been with them so long, I now get a great discount on every refill so my rate is like 12c a minute as opposed to the advertised rate of 35c. I am now in the sweet spot of prepay.

    Still, I really would like to have a new phone and not have to worry about minutes. MetroPCS has their CDMA all-you-can-talk plan for $40. But no roaming to mention and absolutely no cache. MetroPCS is the foodstamps of cellphone.

  76. Re:Consolidate is expected, plus Nextel Phones roc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nextel is NOT the exclusive provider of iDen in the US. Stop perpetuating that myth.

    iDen is only the technology they use just as Sprint uses CDMA, but Nextel didn't invent it any more than Sprint invented CDMA. Motorola owns iDen, not Nextel. Motorola is happy to sell iDen to anyone who wants to buy it and there are indeed other companies using it in the US. Right now.

    SouthernLinc is a big one. They use the exact same technology and iDen phones plus others that Nextel doesn't offer -and they sell the service to the same business customers that Nextel wants. They are in direct competition in the same geographic service areas.

    Now, you are correct that Nextel doesn't allow outside phones on their network -but that alone should tell you that there ARE outside phones out there and somebody must have sold them, i.e. other iDen carriers. Think about it.

  77. Does this mean ... by jkujawa · · Score: 1

    That we're going to have to listen to that goddamned chirp even more often?

    Push to talk ... AND DIE.

  78. You have it Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Sprint's primary wireless market focus are those people who are too old for the Virgin Mobile Prepayed service (Who incidently rents service through Sprint's Network) but do not necessarily have the strong credit rating that Verizon Wireless would prefer from their users. Their current PTT System (ReadyLink) is insufficient to support the needs of most corporate clients.

    This is why NexTEL's PTT is so much more appealing to a corporate user. They essencialy have all the functionality of a privatized radio band without having to pay for the FCC Licences... NexTel Takes care of that for the company as part of their business model.

    Disclaimer: Information used here has been taken from training material furnished by a Sprint Affiliate to be used as a selling point when qualifying a potential wireless customer as to what service would best suit their needs.

  79. sprint vs. nextel by XO · · Score: 1

    if Sprint goes through with this, and doesn't just gut all of Nextel, and offer every one of their customers a great deal on a Sprint phone with ReadyLink, they are completely stupid.

    Nextel's network sucks, Nextel's telephone service sucks, and Sprint's ReadyLink works a lot better (albeit somewhat differently) than DirectConnect.

    --
    "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  80. Went back to outsourcing by ghoul · · Score: 1

    I used to work for Amdocs the billing provider for Sprint PCS in Europe. About 2 years back some nutcase decided that they do not want their work to be outsourced to Europe so all the work was shifted to our American centres which is just staffed by shitheads (Nothing against American programmers but given the small margins on telco software the only people the company can afford in the US are the bottom of the barrel) So basically the whole billing system got screwed up and bills were not going out for months. I even heard at one point they were trying to calculate and print bills using Excel spreadsheets. So finally the management called out Mommy and sent the work back to Cyprus where Indian engineers fixed it so now it works.
    Just goes to show how companies can get fucked if they think they can somehow reverse outsourcing. The fact of the matter is the cost of living in the US is so high its just not possible to hire good people when the salaries you can pay have to compete with those paid to people equally qualified in India.
    The solution reduce healthcare costs. Compared with anywhere else in the world Doctors,Nurses,Medical Assistants and pharmacists get paid ridiculously high wages. In India a computer Engineer will work fewer hours than a doctor and earn 5-6 times more than one. In the US nobody seems to mind paying out of their ass for medical care.
    Secondly get rid of Social security retirement benefits. Rest of the world people have children care for them and then the children care for them in their old age. In the US people who have children actually get punished (lesser promotions) and then society expects those children will take care (through SS taxes) of people who were too lazy or selfish to have children.
    If you think this will never get through congress as the elderly are a group of people who have all the time on their hands to turn out to vote you might be right

    --
    **Life is too short to be serious**
  81. I worked for sprint and owned a nextel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it is a shame that Nextel would do this I hop the FCC puts a stop to it. I worked for sprint z(for a short time period) and that company has major internal issues with the way thay do biz. and it is was borderline breaking the law. If they do get nextel I am going to tell them where they can stick my phone and their early-term-fees. They are taking a choice away not the be owned but some big conglom. of a company.

    guess it is time do a bail to t-mobile or cingular...

    sprint needs to a MAJOR AUDIT of their internal processes used in callcenters and clean up their act. !

    to bad I signed an NDA.... hmm where is a law person when you need them...

  82. What about T-Mobile? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    Half of the articles I read about this merger mention only Sprint, Verizon, and Cingular/AT&T. What about T-Mobile? Aren't they a player too? I use their service right now and the coverage isn't necessarily the best, but the quality of the calls is good, it's a nationwide GSM network, the plan is affordable, and their customer support staff has been pretty universally friendly and helpful.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:What about T-Mobile? by NaDrew · · Score: 1
      What about T-Mobile? Aren't they a player too? I use their service right now and the coverage isn't necessarily the best, but the quality of the calls is good, it's a nationwide GSM network, the plan is affordable, and their customer support staff has been pretty universally friendly and helpful.
      All that, plus they have her...
      --
      Vista:XPSP2::ME:98SE
  83. Re:capitalism by BushIsEvil · · Score: 1

    Yes, well we both know that capitalism is evil and that George W. Bush caused the Cubs to lose to the Marlins in Game 7 of the National League Championship Series so that oil companies, Rush Limbaugh, and gun owners could kill minorities. Right Doc?

    --
    George Bush Banned my IP Address!
  84. UK system by cameldrv · · Score: 1

    The thing is, of course, the minutes aren't free, they're just paid for by someone else. The problem is that you have no incentive to choose a cell provider that has a low incoming call charge because you're not paying for that call. Thus you get the stupid consequence of a competitive commodity good that still has to have regulated prices. In the U.S., the person who pays for the call is the same person that chooses the provider, thus providing an incentive to shop around.

  85. T-Mobile by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    But if you want the coolest phones, you get T-Mobile. Of course, you'll never be able to make a call without the other party going "What? I can't understand you." but you'll ahve an awesome phone.

    I don't know where you're from, but I'm guessing you're not in Southern California. Right now, T-Mobile has one of the best networks out here. It was like night and day when I moved from AT&T TDMA to T-Mobile GSM.

    I don't know how things are going to be once Cingular and T-Mobile comb apart their networks, but right now with the continued interop agreement they seem to be doing just fine.

    I am just damn glad I'm off AT&T's crappy network, away from their crappy customer non-service, and with the geekiest damn mobile phone company on the planet. The coolest phones is only the beginning. Discount 802.11b service at T-Mobile hotspots, very workable GPRS service, all you can eat data or 802.11b for $20/month. (if you want both it's $40) And also, I can travel to Europe and parts of Asia (not Japan alas) and use my own phone!

    Oh yeah: Verizon has a very small local calling area. If I visited my buddies in Santa Barbara and used my phone on VZ I'd be getting hit with roaming charges. My local area with T-Mobile: The continental United States. VZ charges a bomb for nationwide service.

    T-Mobile rocks. (No, I don't work for T-Mobile. I'm just a happy customer.)

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:T-Mobile by XO · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for service specifically in Southern California, but no one in their right mind buys a local only plan anyway.. and sure, your local area with T-Mobile is .. anywhere they have service. Which, by the way, is virtually nowhere. There's a reason they are the smallest physical network. And the sound quality is like garbage cans rattling in an alleyway.

      --
      "Champagne for my real friends - and real pain for my sham friends!" http://ericblade.postalboard.com/
  86. Good... an end to those horrible commercials by MxReb0 · · Score: 1

    I absolutly hate that
    "Where YOU at?!"
    slogan. What a degradation of the English language.

    --

    MAKE YOUR TIME
  87. Networks by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    What makes iDEN so special that it seems to be the only technology one can base a PTT system on?

    Both Sprint and Verizon's experiments with this feature have been unqualified disasters, as you note.

    --

    +++ATH0
  88. Erm. by StarKruzr · · Score: 1

    Jews (Ashkenazim, anyway) ARE white.

    --

    +++ATH0
  89. QChat(tm) for PTT + Mixing best features by PCMeister · · Score: 1

    Earlier this year, there was a conference (Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association or CTIA) which featured a test of the QChat(tm) PTT system. Spear-headed by Nextel, Qualcomm, Kyocera Wireless and Lucent (who happens to be at the core of Sprint's infrastructure), the technology promises cross-platform support. You can read about it here

    Given that Qualcomm's Qchat(tm) system is based on CDMA technology (used by Sprint), and is compatible with NexTel's iDEN(tm) network, this should offer some hope to those worried about being forced to part with their current phones. Of course, that remains to be seen. One can only hope for the best!

    As with any major merger, one of the keys to success lie in the transition team. All the technology in the world won't help if the decision makers are a bunch of egotistical maniacs, hell-bent on implementing "their" vision (no pun intended on the Sprint moniker) of the direction the combined companies should take. All the while, the customer would be left to suffer at the hands of a lousy tech support staff and billing system from hell (both companies suffer from this.)

    I think the implementation of the following features would give rival companies a run for their money:

    * Hybrid version of Vision(tm)/NexTel Web that would be cross-platform compatible.
    * Cross-platform SMS support
    * Unlimited incoming call plans (NexTel)
    * Unlimited Mobile-to-Mobile (or PCS-to-PCS from Sprint)
    * Unlimited PTT (offered by both - hopefully inter-connected via QChat)
    * Proper implementation and use of FOTA (Firmware Over The Air) enabled phones to offer upgrades without the need to visit a local store. Newer Sanyo and Samsung phones offer this feature. I believe many Motorola phones have this capability. If not, a small J2ME program should be written to have the firmware downloaded and only run after the checksum is verified. This would eliminate the worry of a lost signal causing damage to the phone. I don't know the details of the FOTA specs used in Samsung/Sanyo phones, but a similar operation should take place as well.

    * New feature MUST: Tech support and billing system that doesn't screw over the customer and/or give them the run around!

    1. Re:QChat(tm) for PTT + Mixing best features by PCMeister · · Score: 1

      "This would eliminate the worry of a lost signal causing damage to the phone."

      Correction: This would eliminate the worry of a signal loss causing damage to the phone

  90. Re:Consolidate is expected, plus Nextel Phones roc by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    That's why I said "in the united states" :) Nextel does have subsidaries in South America and Telus in canada maintains a compatable network that uses the same phones as Nextel.

  91. Re:Consolidate is expected, plus Nextel Phones roc by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

    I know iDen is a Motorola product. I've just never heard of southern linc before today. (I had a Cingular phone when I traveled in the regions that had Southern Linc coverage) They appear to be a regional provider because I put in my zip code (which is currently serviced by Nextel) and they said they don't offer any coverage in that area. "We are sorry, based on your zip code choice, Southern LINC currently does not provide service in your area. Please check your zip code for accuracy and re-enter if necessary."

  92. Re:capitalism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I don't know about all that baseball crap. I do know that the description of capitalism I posted is accurate. *You* claim to be the expert in "evil", so that's for you to say. I'm just realistic: business is business, and morality is a sideshow in it.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  93. Re:I don't know how it is in the rest of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i HAVE ALWAYS LOVED NEXTEL. I HAVE ALSO ALWAYS LOVED THE DURABILITY AND QUALITY THAT MOTOROLA HAS PROVIDED TO THE NEXTEL HANDSETS.i HAVE STOOD ON MY NEXTEL I 530 WITH ONE FOOT AND NO DAMAGE, i HAVE RAN AN I 500 OVER IN MY 4X4 F150 NO DAMAGE OTHER THAN SCRETCHES. NO OTHER HANDSET PROVIDER DEVELOPES THE DURABILITY OF A NEXTEL. I AM ROOTING FOR MOTOROLA TO SOLELY CREATE THE 2 WAY OHINES FROM THE MERGER ON.

  94. Re:I don't know how it is in the rest of the world by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

    Nah, even though Sprint has bad CS, it's Nextel I'm worried about. It doesn't matter if they've got the furthest reaching signals if they don't even have towers up in an area. Also, while we've had trouble with Sprint CS, Nextel's screwed us over, so they're on the blacklist (the same one AT&T got put on before Cingular bought them out).

    I think Sprint wants Nextel's customer base, and maybe some help with their Ready Link feature (their version of Direct Connect). They've got the business features, and the phones.