Slashdot Mirror


Meetup.com Ends Free Meetups

jalefkowit writes "It was nice while it lasted... massively popular social-organizing service Meetup.com has announced that from here on out, they will be charging a $19/month fee to the designated organizer of each Meetup registered with the service. Regular users (those other than meetup organizers) can continue to use it free of charge, though they suggest that some organizers may wish to split the cost with their members. Users who paid for the Meetup+ service get the fees waived for one group of their choice (if they're not organizers, they can pass this benefit on to someone who is). Here's more information about the move and why they made it."

281 comments

  1. You heard it here first ... by B3ryllium · · Score: 3, Funny

    Pimp My Computerized Dating Match!

  2. And so ends the meetup.com dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I expect to see they're out of business by this time next year.

    1. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by k-0s · · Score: 5, Funny

      I agree and I'm sure Google will only help their demise by adding a "Google Meetup" feature to be followed about 2 months later by Yahoo. Seems to be the trend as of late.

    2. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Did you look at the team members and board of directors in the "about meetup" section? They are going to need to pull in a heck of a lot of money to keep all of those people gainfully employed. You could probably set up and run the whole operation with one manager and a couple of designers, maybe an external accountant contacted once a year to do up the wages.

      I wouldn't deny anyone providing a valuable service the right to make money from that service, but their operation is waaay too bloated to stay afloat. Dot bomb, anyone?

    3. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 1

      It would just be a simple feature to add to Orkut, Friendster, or Yahoo Groups. I don't see anything special about Meetup.com that would require anything more than just a little tinkering with already existing services from other websites.

    4. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, spit it out already. Why do you expect to see them out of business by next year? K-os, first replier to this, why do you think Google and Yahoo will offer similar services?

      Are you just noticing a trend, or do you suspect there is something CAUSING community organizing services like this to go private and ultimately be conglomerated (in this case into Google, et. al.)?

      Personally, I have been noticing a number of secret campaigns to sabotage the efforts of non-profit community movements organizing on the internet.

      For example, a network of "disinformation agents" has emerged to make sure anonymous posting on internet message boards doesn't undermine the publics perception of popular opinion on various issues, especially conspiracy theories.

      There is a campaign to destroy the free software movement. Notice the number of reports coming out that challenge key beliefs about free softwares democratic, philanthropic nature? Although this is only to be expected, there is a marshalling of opposition from commercial software vendors, such as Sun and Microsoft. There have been some suspicious deaths of free software developers / maintainers, and some suspicious illnesses as well.

      I've never used community organizing web sites, although a few years back I was IRC'ing. And yes, in about 2000 I began to notice a network emerging to control key EFnet channels, such as the ones frequented by college students. It doesn't surprise me that community organizing sites are being taken over.

      The bottom line: there is more to the way our supposedly democratic society here in the US works than meets the casual eye, and more to it than what you were taught in your third grade civics classes. Powerful interests are in control, and maintain that control through secret campaings, conspiracies really, which use both legal and illegal means.

      I don't think I like the limitations these powerful interests want to place on my options in life. What do you think? Can enough of us become aware of this, and organize against it, to make a difference?

      Stop speaking in codes. If you think you see this going on also, just say so -- at least anonymously.

    5. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      Pssst, your tinfoil hat is slipping.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    6. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Yahoo already owns Evite, which provides RSVP services for social gatherings. I'm sure Google can find someone to buy and innovatively tie in with all their other portal services.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    7. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      They want to get bought out - so they're "monetizing their assets".

      I predict we'll see a rise in

      1. signatures saying "slashdot meet-up in the #### area - click here".
      2. same deal with other blog services
      3. someone else starts a free service
      4. meet-up offers a meet-up - lite for groups w. less than N members
      5. meet-up goes tits-up
    8. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Yahoo Groups already has a "Calendar" feature that you can use to schedule meetings of import to a group. It even ties in with Yahoo Calendar.

      Google Groups, the embraced-and-extended version of Usenet, doesn't offer this functionality yet.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    9. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by kaushalonline · · Score: 1

      I usually prefer Ryze Mixers on Ryze.com They do have a paid version too. Honestly I think the way to really make this work is giving paid users special features like post-event sharing of photos/files etc. That adds real value to the deal. There's so much more that can be done with post-event features, and that way only the real benefactors of the service would pay!

    10. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except of course, that other sites don't have the problem of Yahoo randomly removing user accounts or groups for whatever reason. Given the volume that yahoogroups handles it's not necessarily so bad, but it seems everybody that actively uses it knows of some group that disappeared for no reason or had its moderator lose access.

    11. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Say, meetup.com?

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    12. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      as the organizer of the largest slashdot meetup, that's exactly what i'm going to do. put up a mailing list and wiki on my website, and link to it in my sig.

    13. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Cool.

      where and when ... ?

    14. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Good news! Google allows people to abuse its groups service as much as they want. As long as you're willing to let your group rely on a beta service, you needn't worry about Google doing evil things.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    15. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Meetup.com is a stable service that doesn't rely on ActiveX and JavaScript for its user interface. I don't really think it fits the Google mold at this point.

      Now if they could add some drop-down features, slap a BETA label on it, and temporarily shut out Safari users, that would be better.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    16. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by Pandora's+Vox · · Score: 1

      Toronto, Ontario, fourth thursday of the month, at Futures Bakery at Bloor and Brunswick. Turnout is usually from 15-20 people.

    17. Re:And so ends the meetup.com dream by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Thanx.

      if/when I'm in T.O., I'll see what I can do ...

  3. Re:You heard it here first ... by B3ryllium · · Score: 1, Troll

    (This is slashdot, no one needs to read TFA. However, in the interests of not being completely retarded, I will acknowledge that I jumped the gun on that FP - since Meetup is for group gatherings. Oops.)

    Based on what I've heard, Meetups are usually fairly popular - I don't think many organizers will have a problem with the fee, and I hope that the company has success with this business model. However, I can see a potential for one-off or irregular meetups to fall by the wayside with the monthly payment structure. I hope they'll have a package structure as well, where you can buy "X" number of meetups and use them at your own pace. Having never used this service, I'm not sure if their range of services are suitable for a package-based option, but I hope they would be.

  4. 2004 called. by Tackhead · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    They want their candidates back.

    All of 'em. Dean, Kerry, Bush, Peroutka, hell, fucking Robert Anton Wilson from the Guns and Dope Party.

    Folks, the election's over. We all knew meetups were just excuses for horny overstressed campaign workers to explain why they woke up with who the fuck is that and what's she doing in my bed? (She's asking herself the very same thing, that's what.)

  5. whatever happened to... by kangpeh · · Score: 5, Funny

    what ever happened to good ol' goin to clubs, getting drunk, findin a girl, who is as drunk as u, having a good night, and never seein that girl again, mutually?

    1. Re:whatever happened to... by mp3LM · · Score: 5, Funny

      STDs

    2. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      what ever happened to good ol' goin to clubs, getting drunk, findin a girl, who is as drunk as u, having a good night, and never seein that girl again, mutually?

      Well, I was going to link to my favorite transsexual shock site [bakla.net] but, sadly, it seems to have gone defunct sometime during the last year.

    3. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      The fact that this got modded interesting scares me.

    4. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what ever happened to good ol' goin to clubs, getting drunk, findin a girl, who is as drunk as u, having a good night, and never seein that girl again, mutually?

      Nothing at all. Why do you ask? It's alive and well, and I'd say better than ever.

      I had a good weekend, how about you? ^___^

    5. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm getting depressed.

    6. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. Nothing ever happened to it.

    7. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot.

    8. Re:whatever happened to... by OSXexpert · · Score: 0

      It was replaced with porno, diseases, fear mongering by the establishment and of course an insatiable desire to watch others struggle to make ourselves feel better. I met my GF online, it works.

      --
      --- Old Time NeXThead
    9. Re:whatever happened to... by piltdownman84 · · Score: 5, Funny

      My wife caught me.

    10. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides I typed "sex" in the "what are you interested in" box, but I got nothin'

      There were like 5 billion D&D groups though.

    11. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worry not, young man (or woman, yeah right). You can do it. Really.

    12. Re:whatever happened to... by aztektum · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be ex-wife?

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    13. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shouldn't that be ex-wife?

      No... She might be his ex-wife now, but at the time he's talking about she was still his wife.

    14. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got aids and died.

    15. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm just as scared that it got modded funny. STDs are no fun.

    16. Re:whatever happened to... by Martin+Spamer · · Score: 1

      Born again virgins.

    17. Re:whatever happened to... by maotx · · Score: 1

      It's kinda scary to wake up next to a girl and not be able to remember where you are, who she is, or why she is dead.

      --
      I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    18. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a blast to have a conversation with.

    19. Re:whatever happened to... by TyfStar · · Score: 1

      the clubs got better lighting?

      --

      "There is a reason Linux is free"

      ~me~

    20. Re:whatever happened to... by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      She caught you at the bar?
      You gotta wonder, what was *she* doing there.

      --
      I don't get it.
    21. Re:whatever happened to... by Safety+Cap · · Score: 1

      "Officer, the girl was dead when I got here, I swear!"

      --
      Yeah, right.
    22. Re:whatever happened to... by thatnerdguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking from experience, are we?

      --
      I saw the Sign, and it opened up my eyes
    23. Re:whatever happened to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is slashdot, you insensitive clod!

  6. Free Meetups end Meetup.com by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    the end is near for meetup.com

  7. alternative? by SolitaryMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This will just move most of the activities to some other place.

    --
    May Peace Prevail On Earth
    1. Re:alternative? by Eloquence · · Score: 1

      I've started a free wiki at Wikicities called EventWiki that can be used for the same purpose (but is broader in scope than MeetUp).

    2. Re:alternative? by bbtom · · Score: 1
      I've also done similarly. I've started a phpBB forum for London Meetups. Shout if anyone wants a forum on there for their meetup group. I've also set up RSS feeds for each of the forums so you can keep track of new group suggestions and any groups that are set up.

      Do join up. I'd quite like to see meetup.com burn for charging these ridiculous sums.

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
  8. Heard this from Democracy for America by payote · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's Howard Dean's old organization - an offshoot of his presidential campaign that used meetups early on. They'll be picking up the tab for Meetups of their DFA groups for a while. But I expect someone will come up with a CC version of the 'meetup' structure... you can't patent a gathering of like-minded people can you?

    --


    Never pet a burning dog.
    1. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by RotJ · · Score: 4, Funny

      The great thing about America is that you can patent anything. Brings a tear to my eye.

    2. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by bergeron76 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Agreed! It's too bad Dean didn't get elected.

      If he had, things might have turned out differently... ... in this case, the small-mid sized businesses (ala meetup.com) might have been able to survive without having to thwart the consumers.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    3. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by uberjon · · Score: 1

      Sorry I patented crying, and the source code for crying. Now fork over my royalties

      --
      Dick Laurent is dead.
    4. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by mo^ · · Score: 1

      You forget my retroactive patent on royalties

      "......mechanism by which the 'owner' of any original idea may recoup financial benefits from reproductions of their original idea....."

      Please hand me 15% of your 15% on your way out

      --
      bah!*@%!
    5. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by TheoMurpse · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now fork over my royalties

      Sorry, I hold the patent on fork(). Pay me.

    6. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I patented patents. Hand over the cash and no one gets sued. Don't look so sad. Imagine how IBM and Microsoft feel when I visit them.

      --
      "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    7. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by HughJJorgan · · Score: 2, Funny

      you can't patent a gathering of like-minded people can you?

      No, but if you're Tom DeLay, you can outlaw one.

    8. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by Stick_Fig · · Score: 1

      That just brought a tear to my eye, so as a result, I just patented your post.

      --
      ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
    9. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      thats why i always spoon(), since it's patent has already expired. Spoon() works for everything. Thats what the kid in the Matrix is trying to say - "there is no spoon() patent" he just got cut off.

      I would LOVE to use spork() but it's patent still has some life left to it.

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    10. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by mshiltonj · · Score: 1

      you can't patent a gathering of like-minded people can you?

      Well, that depends on how much you pay your lawyers, doesn't it?

    11. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I now own US Patent 6,594,193 for Tears on ones' eye. You now owe me $15 per tear for the next 75 years.

    12. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's your username supposed to mean, Return of the Jew? lol

    13. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you can't patent a gathering of like-minded people can you?

      YEEEAAAAAHHHH!

    14. Re:Heard this from Democracy for America by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      I dare say that The Tick patented "spoon" in the mid-80s.

  9. This will begin the downfall... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    of meetup.com. What a great service but now doomed to failure or at least stagnation.

  10. Am I the only one? by npietraniec · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who never heard of this website?

    1. Re:Am I the only one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes you are.

      meetup.com is like the new yahoo.com.

      dude wake up and smell the coffee.

    2. Re:Am I the only one? by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Who never heard of this website?"

      I heard about it, I even used it, but frankly, meetup.com makes some of the same old tired mistakes too many websites make.

      The site isn't transparently easy to navigate. There's no way (or I didn't see one) to search by meet-up time or day. ("Hey I'm free Tuesdays, what's going on Tuesdays.")

      To see the people or the number of people signed-up for a particular meet-up, you had to register with meet-up.com, then "join" that meet-up. Since meet-ups were canceled when fewer than three people signed up, you couldn't effectively browse for what looked like it was really going to happen without first signing up. Pain in the ass.

      You can't indicate, for a meet-up you are interested in, that the meet-up time doesn't work. You can vote for a location, but there's no easy way to indicate what sort of locations work for you: "I don't like smoky bars; I can do in the city but not the 'burbs; near the subway". And once you did sign up for a meet-up, you kept getting annoying email asking that you confirm.

      Some of these things make sense, but much of it was the typical website desire to control and constrain its users, probably at the behest of marketeers who wanted to "track" everything and everybody.

      And the irony is, if by registering, a user could make a profile of what works and doesn't work for him for a meet-up, the marketeers could have mined a hell of a lot more information, information that users would have willingly given.

      But since the site was a pain in the ass to use, without that pain benefiting me in any way, I stopped using it.

      Websites need to realize that people aren't going to change their lives to conform to what's easiest for marketeers to track. When they do realize that -- like craigslist -- they become popular. When they don't -- well, it's time to start charging fees and finding cheaper offices.

    3. Re:Am I the only one? by andy+jenkins · · Score: 1

      You do now! Ah, the power of advertising.

    4. Re:Am I the only one? by Sargondai · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, it doesn't solve all of your issues, but I'd recommend checking out http://www.mypeopleconnection.com/ as an alternative to meetup.com

    5. Re:Am I the only one? by alizard · · Score: 1

      looks like you're halfway to a business model, or at least what the concept needs to be a lot more workable. Consider taking it the rest of the way.

    6. Re:Am I the only one? by Lemuel · · Score: 4, Informative

      They did fix some of your issues in last fall's overhaul. They don't cancel meetings with less than three people anymore. They created the role of organizer, who picks a location, hopefully by consulting with the others through email or the group message board. There is also a place to add a comment when you RSVP, so you can say that you can't make it because it is in the 'burbs. You can control the email you get and none of it is for confirmation, just reminding.

      You still can't search by date, though, and you do have to belong to a meetup group to see what is going on with it.

    7. Re:Am I the only one? by yason · · Score: 1

      Did I miss something, or does "around the globe" (from their website) mean United Stated only these days?

    8. Re:Am I the only one? by nashy-nunu · · Score: 0

      I never heard of it. I am wondering why so much rantong about it...

    9. Re:Am I the only one? by Servo · · Score: 1

      I like the idea of organizer, but they shouldn't be tasked with defining the date/time/place. Especially for small meetup groups desperate for an organizer, they just never meet and an organizer never comes up, so the meetup events never work.

      In my opinion, they started going downhill when they made these changes.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
    10. Re:Am I the only one? by Lemuel · · Score: 1

      I understand what you are saying, and I think requiring the organizer to pay a monthly fee will wipe out small groups and make it hard to start new ones. I think having organizers before when they didn't have to pay, though, was overall a good idea. If you only have a few people in the group and they don't know each other, it is good for someone to take charge. Also, some people are leaders and some are followers, so you can end up with a group where no one does anything. Of course the other side of the problem is that you may get an organizer who makes bad decisions, like the one who tried to move one of my groups out of the county. He eventually gave up and finally resigned once the monthly fee was announced.

    11. Re:Am I the only one? by Servo · · Score: 1

      Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that having organizers was bad. My issue was when they went to having organizers, it started requiring the organizer make ALL the decisions. Before, it would suggest a meetimg place and time. So at least you had a starting point that interested parties could show up and get enough momentum that a leader would volunteer.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  11. Most of us never heard of this site before by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 3, Funny
    To prove it, I quote:
    Sorry, our server experienced an error, and is unable to process your request. This may be a temporary problem due to an upgrade, so please try again in a few minutes. If the problem persists, you can report a bug in our help section.
    A slashdot effect support group, anyone?
    --
    The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
    1. Re:Most of us never heard of this site before by Bifurcati · · Score: 2, Funny
      Meetup - helping slashdotters to get together! And slashdot us!

      Hmmm. Time to revise the business model. No wait, just did that...

  12. Re:You heard it here first ... by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

    I will acknowledge that I jumped the gun on that FP - since Meetup is for group gatherings.

    The two aren't mutually exlcusive, you closed-minded, puritanical clod!

  13. Oh this is Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are probably thousands of other social outcasts, all alone, wondering exactly the same thing.

    1. Re:Oh this is Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outcasts?

      People with a life actually go out and do things, not look on the web for things like this (or spend time on /.)

      This site looks exactly like a gathering of outcasts...

    2. Re:Oh this is Slashdot... by indifferent+children · · Score: 1

      Funny, the only meetups that I ever went to were all /. meetups.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  14. A Flock of Joes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "you can't patent a gathering of like-minded people can you?"

    Patenting congress.

  15. One bad experience... by alex_guy_CA · · Score: 1

    I went to a meetup meeting once, and I was the only one to show up. What a drag. I never botherd again.

    1. Re:One bad experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got food poisoning once. What a drag. I never bothered to eat again.

  16. Big deal by Cyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You don't need meetup to have a group - just have regular meetings and post your group info out there, on some random webpage - it'll show up in google for anyone who is looking.

    no amount of easy to use software is going to convince random people to congregate together - it's the message that matters. Meetup isn't a service - it's a very limited template system with forums.

    --
    cyn, free software and *nix operating systems enthusiast.
    1. Re:Big deal by sien · · Score: 1
      True, you don't need meetup to have a group, however meetup.com provided was a central place where you could find all those groups. If you check your local city you'll find heaps of groups that are surprising.

      The pity about this is that while some groups may not mind the fees there are many little groups that are tried and another hurdle has been placed in their way.

      It's a pity that they can't organise some kind of cheaper system. Really, meetup doesn't provide that much.

      You have to wonder how long it will be before the Yahoo, Google or even craigslist step up to fill the void.

    2. Re:Big deal by xiaomonkey · · Score: 1

      It seems interesting that there's not already more competition for this kind of service. It's not like we're dealing with a particularly complicated web, just something a small handleful of hackers probably could piece together in a weekend.

      Does anybody know of any alternatives? Well known or otherwise?

    3. Re:Big deal by rjshields · · Score: 1

      Meet up in my pants, every wednesday. Hot chicks invited! No nerds, please.

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    4. Re:Big deal by sellin'papes · · Score: 1

      A well known alternative is google-groups which allows groups to form around common interests and exchange information about meeting dates/locations. This information can be viewed by any member of the public who is looking for a similar project.

      --
      This is my last post.
      [6th Estate]
    5. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      me an my homiez gonna crash it boyee! Hope you be wearin da big pants fo' us

    6. Re:Big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft. I went last week and the place was empty.

    7. Re:Big deal by rjshields · · Score: 1

      I said *no* geeks, please.

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
  17. Re:You heard it here first ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I've got your attention; is Google somewhat horked for anyone else? I'm being force-redirected to the XHTML Search version. AKA, Ultra-Lean interface.

  18. At first I thought it was bad... by taxman_10m · · Score: 4, Insightful

    However, it's only $9 a month for those of us who are already organizers. My group consistently gets 9 people at the meetup and we usually spend in total $100+ on food and drinks. If everyone that showed up just threw in $1 then the dues for that month would be paid off (and even if I didn't get the whole $9, I'd just top it off myself). Not that big a deal as I see it.

    Of course it probably does discourage groups that are not already established from forming or growing...

    1. Re:At first I thought it was bad... by johnd39 · · Score: 1

      The bad part about it, though, is that this is yet another example of a corporation (like QLink/AOHell) redefining "community" as "cashflow". In the case of meetup.com - if everyone pays the Danegeld - $34 million/yr in cashflow to start ($19 x 12 months x 150,000 claimed groups).

      Sure, you can pay them, but why bother? The print flyers they're offering now? Are you going to find a use for them? If not, maybe you want to save your money for more food. ;>

    2. Re:At first I thought it was bad... by Kyrene · · Score: 2, Informative
      Of course it probably does discourage groups that are not already established from forming or growing...

      Yup, that's exactly what it's going to do. I am the organizer of two groups, both of which have less than 5 people who make it monthly. And that $9/month fee only lasts for this year on top of it all. I certainly can't expect nor wouldn't expect the one or two people who show up to start kicking in $4 a piece or whatever, so I plan to resign as organizer.

      Oh well. It was fun while it lasted. :(

      --
      Do not disturb. Already disturbed. http://www.teaaddictedgeek.com
    3. Re:At first I thought it was bad... by Reapy · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just exchange email addresses and organize your group that way? Why do you need a website like that if you have already met and established a group?

    4. Re:At first I thought it was bad... by Kyrene · · Score: 1
      That's great if you already know everyone in the group. The great thing about meetup.com was the ability to meet new people in your area who share your interests.

      I used their service when I moved to Boston in order to make new friends and get around socially. And yes, it worked. :)

      --
      Do not disturb. Already disturbed. http://www.teaaddictedgeek.com
    5. Re:At first I thought it was bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Dues " .. like it's Boy Scouts or something. How dull a marketing idea is that?

    6. Re:At first I thought it was bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just use yahoo groups its free

  19. To hell with that... by bergeron76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are much better ways to organize "real people". Meetup.com was fun while it lasted, but I'll be one of the first to remove links to it from my site.

    They offered a decent service while it lasted, and _yes_ they should get something for their efforts; but they _shouldn't_ sabotage their users to get compensation.

    They'll die unless they re-create or re-evaluate their efforts within the next 3 weeks.

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  20. Seems to me.... by Arclight17 · · Score: 0

    It seems to me that the only thing that they've really changed is the addition of newly printed materials (business cards, how to booklets, etc.). They did add back the free email, which had been free, then they charged for.
    And the ability for group organizers to collect fees from "free members".
    All I really see is vague allusions to NEW services. But nowhere can I find what these services actually are.

    --
    All men can fly, but sadly, only in one direction--Down.
  21. Re:You heard it here first ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in case anyone desperately needs the regular google front page

  22. Braindead by fremen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See, here's the problem: what Meetup did is really not that far beyond a good PHP programmer who knows a thing or two about MySQL. It's cool, but we're not talking about something like Salesforce.com or Turbo Tax Online. This is a simple web app.

    And here's the thing, someone is going to recreate Meetup. Their new page will have less brand recognition, and people will probably pay $19 for the Meetup name for a little while. However, this will not last forever. Meetup isn't Microsoft -- they have no extended brand or monopoly power in the face of competition.

    Prediction: Meetup.com will be appearing on the Dot-Com Deadpool shortly.

    BTW, if I were running Meetup, I would have investigated a completely different approach. These little web apps that become big should think about extending their services for a fee. For example, something like customized invitations for $20 a box or a set of subscriber only options.

    1. Re:Braindead by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1
      See, this is why things like Livejournal is still around, and other stuff has gone to the dogs.

      Anything that depends on the size of its community to stay afloat shouldn't be entirely non-free. That especially becomes true if what your site is can be replicated in less than 100 man-hours of work. Someone will clone you, and all your business will go away.

      I can't imagine anything like myspace staying around if all of a sudden it went to a membership system. People wouldn't fork up the money, and the allure of the site would go away.

      This proves that a programmer was behind this... because like me, the guy has no common business sense.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    2. Re:Braindead by snorklewacker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      > See, here's the problem: what Meetup did is really not that far beyond a good PHP programmer who knows a thing or two about MySQL.

      No, it isn't technically complicated at all. But there's not a whole lot of business plans that will fly on ad revenue alone, and meetup's niche is too small. I'm surprised citysearch or digitalcity didn't borg them long ago.

      I doubt you or I could even pay the hosting costs for such a site on ad revenue alone, let alone paying support and maintenance. You really need to stop thinking that the technical implementation is the magic that makes it all work and that you possess the keys to the kingdom by having more than passing knowledge of the technology. There's just a lot more to running a business than that.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    3. Re:Braindead by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      See, here's the problem: what Meetup did is really not that far beyond a good PHP programmer who knows a thing or two about MySQL. It's cool, but we're not talking about something like Salesforce.com or Turbo Tax Online. This is a simple web app.

      And here's the thing, someone is going to recreate Meetup.


      I just got an email from the guy who organizes a Meetup event that I sometimes go to. He pointed out http://www.mypeopleconnection.com/ as an alternative.

    4. Re:Braindead by cgenman · · Score: 1, Insightful

      there's not a whole lot of business plans that will fly on ad revenue alone, and meetup's niche is too small.... I doubt you or I could even pay the hosting costs for such a site on ad revenue alone, let alone paying support and maintenance.

      But save maintenance (which shouldn't be too much once things are up and running) costs and income scale with userbase. They should be able to get hosting that meets their needs for 40 bucks a month. If not, they should be able to split a colo for the cost of a common server and 50 dollars a month. It probably wouldn't pay the guy's rent, but the site certainly should pay for itself. You could probably premium the ads, as you can target with lazer-like efficiency what your users are interested in.

      But going pay is a bad idea. Social Networking sites thrive when there is no cost to sign up. Without the volume of groups, there is no reason for anyone to try going there to find groups. And do they really drive enough traffic to be worth the 20 dollars a month? Will they in a year once all of the groups have moved back to plain websites? My guess is no. Plus, when you have paying customers your support costs go way up, as you actually have to start supporting people. At least when you're ad supported you can ignore their cries for help.

      I always liked Craigslist's compromise... Charge those people least likely to be inconvienienced by charging, and keep everything else free. I don't know if that is directly relevant here, but the reason why Craigslist continues to thrive is all of the free postings. If it were charged, I'm sure the volume of everything would go down, the relevance would go down, the eyeballs would leave, and the site would fall alongside all of the other online classifieds.

    5. Re:Braindead by beforewisdom · · Score: 1
      You really need to stop thinking that the technical implementation is the magic that makes it all work and that you possess the keys to the kingdom by having more than passing knowledge of the technology. There's just a lot more to running a business than that.
      Yep, "build it and they will come" is not necessarily the case.

      A myriad of empty empty web boards, low traffic email lists, empty chat rooms, and forgotten IRC channels are proof of that.

    6. Re:Braindead by indifferent+children · · Score: 1
      You really need to stop thinking that the technical implementation is the magic that makes it all work and that you possess the keys to the kingdom by having more than passing knowledge of the technology.

      We tried putting the marketeers, professional managers, and VCs in charge. Result: dot-bomb.

      Small sites and businesses that revolutionized the ways that people communicate and use information turned into poorly run Superbowl-ad-purchasing, high burn-rate money sinks that thought innovation meant getting rich.

      --
      Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
    7. Re:Braindead by fremen · · Score: 1

      You really need to stop thinking that the technical implementation is the magic that makes it all work and that you possess the keys to the kingdom by having more than passing knowledge of the technology. There's just a lot more to running a business than that.

      Who said that the next implementation of Meetup would be run as a business? This is Slashdot, the biggest open source news site lacking a business plan there is. Most people reading this page would do something like this because it's cool or because they want to make a mark on the open source world. It's been my experience that most geeks don't even consider a business plan before bravely going off and doing something crazy. Many of them make loads of cash regardless.

      Don't get me wrong. I would have a business plan before I did anything goofy like this, but I'm not your average DIY geek with too much free time on my hands. Meetup is facing competition from all of those people who leap before looking. There are lots of them.

    8. Re:Braindead by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      A businessman who doesn't understand what "Low barrier to entry" means, is a fool.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:Braindead by Suidae · · Score: 1

      As has been pointed out, while an app like this is useful, its hard to make money from it because its not very valued. What I'd like to see is a distributed p2p version. Maybe using a scheme similar to what FreeNet uses for serial publications (each version of the publication includes links to the pre-generated key to the next few versions, queries for those versions fail until they are published). Since the requirement for FreeNet-like anonymity isn't there the performance and routing could be much better, and the publishing method allows for hosting whatever kind of content is required (web pages, message boards, etc).

      Distributed hosting of content like this would be a great thing to have working, it eliminates the need for ad-supported services. The load is shared by the members resources. The more members logged in, the more resources are available to support them.

    10. Re:Braindead by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      > We tried putting the marketeers, professional managers, and VCs in charge. Result: dot-bomb.

      Actually, it was starry-eyed techs who came to greedy VC's with nothing but sexy high-tech implementations, lacking such minor details as a business plan, that were the first to be shaken out. As speculation typically goes, no one on the inside really had control over why there there was a bubble or when it would burst, but the insiders are certainly the ones that can help or hurt their survival prospects when the inevitable shakeout comes. And the pure-techies lost big.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
    11. Re:Braindead by snorklewacker · · Score: 1

      > This is Slashdot, the biggest open source news site lacking a business plan there is.

      But this proves the point: go start another slashdot, a better slashdot, see how it does. You'll almost certainly still be much smaller, no matter how good you are. If that floats your boat, fine, but users are the lifeblood of social networking.

      Really though ... if anything calls for being based on P2P technology, social networking is it. Why have central hosting at all? People who are interested will already have the resources and will be interested in providing it. You might use single servers for identity purposes, but even that doesn't require a single authoritative root, just an agreement among the groups on a particular directory.

      A little embellishment on that paragraph could have netted seven figures in VC five years ago. I never even got the chance to have a Ferarri reposessed ... sniff.

      --
      I am no longer wasting my time with slashdot
  23. Another Slashdot Advertisement! Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Once again, Slashdot advertises for a service that:

    A) Has no bearing on my life
    B) Has no bearing on most of the SlashDot community
    C) IS probably being paid for to mention
    D) Means nothing to anyone except the author
    E) All of the above

    Of course, my spam "modifier" (i.e., biased opinion of the moderators) will send this post to -1 hell, but thanks anyway guys - that just means that you proved my point and I'm correct.

    Good going.

  24. What's really important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Patenting congress.

    Fine with me. Just don't patent sexual congress.

  25. One is that all members of a paid off group by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

    Will be able to one-to-one message eachother. This used to be a Meetup+ service ($5 a month). You couldn't even one-to-one message if you were an organizer.

    1. Re:One is that all members of a paid off group by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
      Will be able to one-to-one message eachother. This used to be a Meetup+ service ($5 a month). You couldn't even one-to-one message if you were an organizer.

      You mean, once we pay $19, we will finally be allowed to use our email clients to send each other messages? Amazing!

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  26. I don't quite get the point.. by proteonic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After reading the FAQ, I don't quite see the benefit of this service. They don't seem to offer anything that isn't already freely available (communications and email, they say). As far as professionally printed materials for your club.. anyone who's willing to go to the effort of putting together a club, I'd imagine, would be motivated enough to save the 19 bucks and get things printed themselves. Is there really a market for this service?

    I just don't get it.. is there some target group of motivated but lethargic people that are willing to put in the effort to organize, run and manage a club, but somehow, find keeping a list of members' emails a significant barrier to achieving their goals?

    I'm ranting a bit, but I'm quite surprised. This is one of the oddest services I've seen on the net. It goes against the intuition of online dating sites, for example. Where the clients may be a little more reserved and slightly anti-social (thus the need for online dating). Meetup is actually targeting what appears to be a socially very active group of clients. I wonder how they're doing.

    Any slashdotters using this service? Feel free to enlighten me.
    1. Re:I don't quite get the point.. by Lemuel · · Score: 1

      What they offer is a place for someone to go to find groups to meet with on subjects they are interested in. Meetup provides an initial place to publicize the group, so someone can try starting one even if they don't know too many other people who share their interest. I organize the Spanish group in Akron and while there may not be a huge number of people who will see the meetup page for it it is more than will see a page I put together somewhere else, and it is easier to do.

      The meetup isn't just targeted to the socially active. It is good for the socially inactive as a way to get out of the house. It is a lot easier to strike up a conversation among people with whom you share a common interest than it is to go to a bar and talk to random strangers.

      Having said all that, I'm in three groups. They all started out with one or two people last fall. The Investor's Business daily group now gets 10+ and is pretty good. The Spanish group gets 5 or so some nights and just me on others. The Chinese language group is still at one or two and may fold since our dormant organizer quit once he found he was going to be charged. Meetup admits that the new fee structure will shake out some of the weak groups, which is probably a good thing.

    2. Re:I don't quite get the point.. by Ubergrendle · · Score: 1

      I will second your post... what does this site do that I can't manage via Evite or Yahoo Calendar? Or manually updating my Outlook calendar offline?

      Sure, automated bookings and invites and calendaring online is nice and convenient, but $9/month is ridiculous.

      --
      John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    3. Re:I don't quite get the point.. by Lemuel · · Score: 1

      Evite is geared toward bars, restaurants, and events rather than groups meeting for a common interest. I'm not quite sure how Yahoo Calendar offers anything like Meetup at all.

      The $9 a month is a pain and it may be fatal to meetup.com, but only the organizer pays and they can collect from attendees.

  27. I'd expect evite.com to jump in by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

    They basically provide the same "show everyone that RSVP'd for something" service.

    1. Re:I'd expect evite.com to jump in by sien · · Score: 1

      It isn't international, which meetup was but does seem to provide much of the same stuff.

  28. In other news... by AaronStJ · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Meetup.com ends having users and meetups.

    --
    Stupid like a fox!
  29. Looks like a job for Google! by kinema · · Score: 1

    This is the first time I've heard of Meetup.com. Too bad, it truly looks interesting. Hopefully someone will clone it soon. Why not Google? It seems like a great application for AdWords.

  30. What do they do? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    What exactly is accomplished by meetup.com that couldn't be done through yahoo groups and a free geocities site?

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:What do they do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have pre-existing relations with venues that greatly facilitate the ease of setting up a meeting.

    2. Re:What do they do? by jazzfeigling · · Score: 1

      Also, Yahoo Groups is apparently incompetent when it comes to search engines. Even if you know the exact name of the group you want to find, The 'Find a Group' search on the Yahoo groups homepage: http://groups.yahoo.com/ will return 'Sorry, no matches found'. This means you can't tell someone that you have a group on Yahoo groups and just give them the name. You have to give them the exact URL, otherwise it doesn't exist.

  31. Great. by chardman · · Score: 1

    Another website that I could care less about will cease to exist in a couple of weeks.

    1. Re:Great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/could/couldn't/

      Think about it...

  32. Mmm... by mlk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Signed up for the London /.ers meetup thingy. Thought it would be a laugh.

    Got spam from spammers.
    Got spam from meetup, wanting a new coord.
    Got spam from meetup telling about new coord.
    Got spam from spammers.
    Got spam from meetup, wanting a new coord.
    Got spam from meetup telling about new coord.
    Got spam from spammers.
    Got spam from meetup, wanting a new coord.

    I think the London /. meetup thingy is dead.

    --
    Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    1. Re:Mmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      I think the London /. meetup thingy is dead.
      It's been dead for a while, IMO. The "original" /. London crowd forked their own mailing list and have had their own group, independent of Meetup.com, for a while.
      Thanks to Meetup.com for bringing us together.
      Thanks to mailman and my mates server for keeping us together.


      Steev
      (member of /. london: http://www.openthought.com/mailman/listinfo/slashd ot-london)
    2. Re:Mmm... by Slurms · · Score: 1

      Does the first guy to the pub shout 'First Pint' when he gets there?

      --

      -----
      Pretty Bad Privacy (PBP) Public Key
      6
    3. Re:Mmm... by mlk · · Score: 1

      Is it still going?

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
  33. Shooting Self in Foot by Comatose51 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've been signed up to that site for a while. Unless your group is well established, it's very difficult to get it going. The Dallas Chess meetup group collapsed. The cycling group meets never worked. Most of the members were inactive. The administrators are really killing any chance of these fledgling groups growing with this idea. They've done very little to promote as is. The idea of critical mass somehow managed to escape them. Charge well-established groups with N members but leave the little ones so they have time to grow. As it is, members can't directly message each other with their Meetup+ membership. It is very difficult to organize anything if you can't contact other members via email and only via the forums or the organizer. I've tried explaining critical mass to them but they don't seen to value it. Once a group get big enough, the numbers will attract other people and activities can happen and repeat. Below that level, things just fall apart. No one goes to meets so the newcomers become inactive, etc. When the next newcomers arrive, the old members are already inactive so there's not enough people to do anything.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:Shooting Self in Foot by Lemuel · · Score: 1

      Critical mass is definitely the problem. One of my groups, for the Investor's Business Daily, went from 2 to 10+ in one meeting for no obvious reason. It has done well since then. The other two aren't doing so well. The Chinese language group will get one or two people who decide it is a waste of time and quit going. Then one or two other people will go and decide the same thing. The trick is to get everyone to go at once, but that is hard to do. There's nothing like that loser feeling when you go to a meeting and you are the only one there.

      They do now allow open email between members under the new arrangement.

  34. Meetin.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Try http://meetin.org/ There is most likely a group where you are, (organized by city), all over the world. Instead of being limited to one focus, there are a wide variety of events to choose from and people to meet in each city. If your city is not yet added, you can easily have it added and start planning events!

    1. Re:Meetin.org by wlashell · · Score: 1

      There is no cost to be a member of meetin.org either. It's a great site with a good group of people at least in Phoenix. I've met members from other groups and they have all been cool too.

    2. Re:Meetin.org by caffeinewhore · · Score: 1

      I'm an Event Planner for MEETinDC, and I can't say enough good things about it. Of course... I might be biased. It's free, over 4000 people (in DC), and the events are a blast. House parties to Art Walks this group has something for everyone.

    3. Re:Meetin.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its great and free! events to suit everyone and if you want to host your own event you can. I've met some great people thru meetin. Long live Meetin.org

    4. Re:Meetin.org by Some+Bitch · · Score: 1
      There is most likely a group where you are, (organized by city), all over the world.

      Looks great for North America, not so much for the rest of the world. London is the only city listed in the UK and Germany only has Berlin/Dusseldorf. In both cases the vast majority of people will be well outside the useful radius of this service.

    5. Re:Meetin.org by mockingbird296 · · Score: 1

      I was a member of both until I just canceled my Meetup membership. Meetin.org is so much better and it's free! Much more of a cohesive group than Meetup.

  35. Going the way of the buffalo... by m4c+north · · Score: 1
    I use/used meetup.com. I found it very helpful to find some connections right after I moved to a new city. I even started a group, but after 8 months of one-man meetups, I figured out that folks in Shizuoka just don't Lindy Hop.

    I also found the Tokyo LUGs with meetup, as the websites google found were way out of date.

    My course is inaction. I wonder what will happen to a group whose organizer doesn't pay. How long before I get the boot? Will it be that far ahead of meetup's (seemingly inevitable) demise? At least my popular group won't be missed.

    --
    Who's your user, program?
  36. Couldn't People by lasmith05 · · Score: 0

    Just use evite.com or something? Does that cost money to? What happened to using IRC to organize people online. haha

    --
    www.samuraidreams.com - My Blog
    www.samuraifiles.com - Get Some Videos Here
    1. Re:Couldn't People by Kyrene · · Score: 1

      Evite assumes that you already know the people with whom you're meeting up. The great thing about meetup.com was meeting new people with the same interests.

      --
      Do not disturb. Already disturbed. http://www.teaaddictedgeek.com
  37. Yawn by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Totally YAWN.

    -d

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
  38. Meetup.com is being silly by Jane+Hackworth · · Score: 3, Interesting
    According to the article:

    Here's some of what's new:

    • Free one-to-one email for all members of your Group!

    Wait...people can send e-mail to each other instead of to a group address? Who'd've thunk it?

    Custom, professionally-printed offline materials for your group-- shipped (real mail, not email!) to Organizers for free!

    I could make a lot of photocopies for $19 a month.

    Optional online tools to make it easy for Organizers to receive money from their members.

    If these members are motivated enough to sign up with a Meetup payment system, why wouldn't they just go with PayPal, which they can use for everything else as well?

    We expect the number of Meetups will go down at first, but the community will rebound stronger than ever. The Group Fee will weed out less committed groups; the community will be smaller in the near-term, but it will be made up of the best Meetup Groups. ...

    Oh, I get it. If you're smart enough to figure out a more productive use for $19 a month, you're just not "committed" enough. Since when was being stupid with money a sign of moral fiber?

    1. Re:Meetup.com is being silly by randyflood · · Score: 1

      You know, in small cities, it is hard enough to just find 2 or three people willing to show up for a meetup of any kind at all. It is hard enough to find *anyone* willing to volunteer to oragnize a meeting without being paid. But you know, the beauty of the Internet is that it always finds a way to route around stupidity like this. I mean, someone has already mentioned MEETin.org . However, that site is pretty limited. It does not cover smaller cities and does not seem to focus on special interest groups like meetup.com does. What is needed is for someone to create a new free web site to compete with meetup.com, offering a free service, in order to rationalze thier prices.

      --
      Randy.Flood@RHCE2B.COM
  39. Re:Another Slashdot Advertisement! Nice! by eobanb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What a troll. This was to point out that Meetup is now charging for what was once a free service. It's not an ad. It's just informative. Personally, I'm the organizer of the Current TV group in Milwaukee. We just got off the ground, but now we're going to have to end this unless Current can pay. I heard about the fact that they were charging from this very article (Meetup also sent out an email but I hadn't checked it yet). Meetup was great while it lasted. Now we'll probably just move to a different site.

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

  40. Re:Another Slashdot Advertisement! Nice! by John+Seminal · · Score: 0, Troll
    Once again, Slashdot advertises for a service that:

    A) Has no bearing on my life
    B) Has no bearing on most of the SlashDot community
    C) IS probably being paid for to mention
    D) Means nothing to anyone except the author
    E) All of the above

    I was thinking the same thing. Who gives a fuck about meetup.com. I never even heard of them.

    I remember 3 or 4 years ago I saw a website with 1,000,000 singles looking for a date. It said "register for free, search for free, meet the love of your life". So I signed up. The thing they did not tell you was it cost money to send a message. And you could not delete your profile. So I bet of the 1,000,000 people there, 900,000,000 did what I did- made a profile and never went back. I would hate to be the idiot who sent a message to a dead account.

    One would think they could make enough money from advertising. Look at slashdot. They make money, and I ignore all their ad's.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

  41. Thanks for the idiocy, retard! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, who the fuck modded this shit up?

    Pure drivel.

    If anything, meetup.com is now fucked. I've never heard of an advertisement announcing a company was going to go under soon. Of course, I bet you think that Jump Domain is now ROLLING IN DOUGH thanks to their /. article.

  42. PayPal by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

    Meetup.com linked their payment options to PayPal.

    1. Re:PayPal by Jane+Hackworth · · Score: 1

      PayPal: free. Meetup.com: $19/month. Which should I use? Let me do the math... *scratch* *scratch* *puzzle*

    2. Re:PayPal by allpolitics · · Score: 1
      PayPal: free. Meetup.com: $19/month. Which should I use? Let me do the math... *scratch* *scratch* *puzzle*

      I just checked. Paypal doesn't provide a calendar, a way to set a venue, ability to rsvp, membership lists, communication tools, or other needed tools to organise a meeting. I know, I just searched paypal for that stuff.

      What's the deal? How's paypal doing it without me being able to find out?

      --ap
  43. I bet the poor nerds are really upset about this.. by killtheOSSnazis · · Score: 0

    I'm sure the poor OSS nerds are crying about this wanting their open source dating service /rolleyes

  44. meetup sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't believe this company is still around...

  45. What a brilliant idea! by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is pure genius!

    I already get emails from half the groups I'm signed up for saying "Your group has no organizer, would you like to volunteer?". Up until now, I didn't volunteer because I wasn't sure I'd have the time -- now that I get to volunteer AND PAY $20 FOR THE PRIVILEGE, I'll get right on it!

    I'm sure local meetup groups will really take off now! Next month maybe they'll finally add the "pay $5 and get kicked in the nuts" service we've all been clamoring for!

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    1. Re:What a brilliant idea! by beforewisdom · · Score: 1
      Up until now, I didn't volunteer because I wasn't sure I'd have the time -- now that I get to volunteer AND PAY $20 FOR THE PRIVILEGE, I'll get right on it!
      Exactly!
      Next month maybe they'll finally add the "pay $5 and get kicked in the nuts" service we've all been clamoring for!
      That would almost be greater evidence of their lack of business sense than charging to be an admin. You can get a lot more then $5 for kicking someone in the nuts, especially if you are a good looking gal decked out in something shiny and black. --
    2. Re:What a brilliant idea! by Threni · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the dot com boom all over again! What was that company called, the one that was like ebay - they sold stuff, other people made the money, and they just held the goods. You can't buy stupidity like that!

    3. Re:What a brilliant idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm sure local meetup groups will really take off now! Next month maybe they'll finally add the "pay $5 and get kicked in the nuts" service we've all been clamoring for!


      I'm sure some fetishist groups would be eager to
      pay for this service!
  46. no more redhat meetups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suppose it had just started to catch up.
    interesting.
    I understand it's commercial requirements. but was it too early??

  47. What the fuck?!?! by The+Dodger · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anyone who organise a meet-up without needing the help of some crappy dot-com to doesn't deserve to have a social life! Fuck 'em!

    They say: What are you interested in?
    I say: Making fun of sad, pathetic losers with no lives! Where's the nearest meetup to me, so I can turn up with a huge banner saying "YOU SAD, PATHETIC LOSERS!"?

    Time says: "A convenient, non-threatening way to connect to other people who share similar interests and live nearby."
    I say: Non-threatening? Not if I have anything to do with it!

    They say: Jobs. Meetup.com is looking for an exceptional Project Manager committed to helping our members succeed.
    I say: Succeed at what? Having a life?

    Christ, in my day, we had Usenet, 2600 and IRC, and we didn't fucking need no steenking meetup.com charging us 19 of your American dollars each time we wanted to get together and pretend that we weren't sad!

    Bah! Flogging's too good for 'em!


    D.

  48. Re:You heard it here first ... by icebike · · Score: 1

    Massively Popular? You must be kidding.
    A useless spam generator imho.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  49. Mod parent up by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just visited the site, and every group I looked at (in my area) lacked an organizer. Charging the only people WILLING to put in the TIME (remember, time = money) to organize the group just seems like defunct logic to me.

    Why can't they just display ads?

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Why can't they just display ads?"

      Because you forget -- every geek in the world is trying to promote the fact that you can get around displaying advertisements on sites and like to show off ot others how to do it themselves. I'm all for popup blockers -- but I'll be damned if I change whats in the main pages.

      But now with apps like Greasemonkey and standard ad blockers that come standard with some firewall software I get notes When Did You Start Advertising everytime I change the image sizes or location on my site -- it seems the people I'd really want to advertise to are the ones that won't even see the ads.

      Advertising is one way to go, but remember we also pay for cable television. Ads only go so far. On my site, I just started a premium service a month ago...its only $30 a year, and so far I've made a few hundred. This almost pays for a month or two of hosting. Glad I don't have to pay any of my 'staff' -- though they are whining now that they are seeing a lot of money come our way and have been asking about it as I'm getting both ad revenue AND premium services. I lose a few grand a year running the site, but if I weren't doing this, I'd be off spending money on some other hobby that was only entertaining to me and not so educational to others. The last conference I went to several of us met up (and didn't need meetup.com) and we were able to hold informal sessions while the big guys were charging $1500 a session...it still cost me a few hundred for the priveledge of flying out and being there along with all the conference fees.

      Some people run websites as businesses. We can't fault them for this. Anyone that has run a larger site knows what the realities of the situation are. I certainly do. I'd love to see my site as a commercial entity (it already is, but acts in reality like a nonprofit) but I'm not going to alienate my users to do so. Other sites were designed from the beginning to be commercial -- meetup.com seemed to be just that. They can't go on with good will alone.

      And ads get you no where...its just like TV these days -- several shows cost way to much to produce and as such advertising revenues don't even pay for the production. Its DVD sales that pay for the costs several years down the road (why do you think people are getting upset about trading shows over BT -- I just downloaded the last Lost yesterday as I missed a scene watching it over the air -- I might get sued now).

      Ads...sounds great until you run a larger site that needs actual structure and folks who know whats going on.

    2. Re:Mod parent up by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      Advertising is one way to go, but remember we also pay for cable television.

      Ah, so you are too young to remember when there WERE no ads on cable TV. You were paying for it; why would there be ads? Sure, at the top of the hour (and maybe the half hour), you'd see announcements for other shows and general branding spots (a la PBS), but there were no commercials.

      Those days are gone now, as cable TV companies have found how to have their cake and eat it, too.

      ----------------
      Shower to the Sheeple!

    3. Re:Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I remember this too.

      I also know that todays over the air television is better than 70s and 80s cable. And there wasn't much variety. You picked up HBO, Showtime and Cinemax back then for your troubles and for these 3 channels, you paid $40 a month. I pay $20 a month and get nearly 100 channels.

      So have their cake and eat it too? This might be true, but they have to provide a lot more for a much smaller portion of that cake...

  50. Re:Nothing to see here... by karniv0re · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is there anyone else on here who sees the need for a Firefox extention that filters out Slashdot cliches? Maybe it's just me.

  51. Re:Another Slashdot Advertisement! Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, my spam "modifier" (i.e., biased opinion of the moderators) will send this post to -1 hell, but thanks anyway guys - that just means that you proved my point and I'm correct.

    Since you're now at +5 it looks like we've proved you wrong, and you're incorrect.

  52. Braindead-TechnoGod. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You really need to stop thinking that the technical implementation is the magic that makes it all work and that you possess the keys to the kingdom by having more than passing knowledge of the technology."

    Technology is god.

    ---
    http://www.zopto.com/

  53. Re:Another Slashdot Advertisement! Nice! by bigmouth_strikes · · Score: 1

    It sounds like msn.com is more like the kind of news site your are looking for buddy. After all, it is catering to the uninformed masses.

    --
    Oh, I can't help quoting you because everything that you said rings true
  54. Re:Another Slashdot Advertisement! Nice! by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Once again, Slashdot advertises for a service that...
    Dude, chill out. The MeetUp service was totally free for a long time. You can see the original Slashdot story, plugging MeetUp and announcing the creation of Slashdot MeetUps, from almost three years ago.

    This story is relevant because there are a lot of people who actually went to various Slashdot MeetUps. If you want to bitch about paid ads on Slashdot, call me when the next Roland Piquepaille story is posted.
    --
    "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  55. Re:Another Slashdot Advertisement! Nice! by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    Speak for yourself. I use (or at least used to use) meetup.com myself, and know of many other slashdotters who do.

    C) IS probably being paid for to mention

    It always amuses me when I see somebody claiming this. You do realize that -anybody- can submit stories, right? I've submitted 41 in the past year, 21 of which were accepted. I assure you that I didn't pay for any of them.

  56. I was waiting for by danhan79 · · Score: 1

    hookup.com

  57. Re:Nothing to see here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about Slashdot filtering out articles where if you click "Read More..." it then presents a screen with "Nothing to see here move along" just as this one did

    That would remove the need for a Firefox filter

    So yes, its just you

  58. There is a better similar system by unk1911 · · Score: 4, Informative

    MEETin.org is a free, much more popular system and has very thriving communities in New York, D.C., and other large metropolitan areas. I was a member of both but meetup.com events never really got big enough to get excited over while MEETin peeps are much more fun to hang out with.

    --
    http://unk1911.blogspot.com

  59. Mod Parent Up by ploss · · Score: 1

    Quite informative; if only I had mod points!

    Plus, meetin.org is free to join. Seems like having your business based solely on a simple website is a recipe for failure (and they are following it quite well.)

    --
    What are the odds that some idiot will name his mutex ether-rot-mutex!
  60. Re:What a brilliant idea! MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    too insightful and too funny!

  61. We used it to start with... by nimblebrain · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but there are some kinds of meetups of people for which it ended up being... inappropriate.

    We used Meetup to get folks together and reunite local Delphi developers. The first couple of meet-and-greets at a coffee shop were pretty good.

    That said, at least at the time, the venues listed for meeting at were sponsored by local businesses, and precious few of them were even passable for a meeting of geeks, especially when it became clear that folks wanted to come out and learn stuff.

    The semi-biker-and-pool-hall that, through lack of folks knowing what it was, got voted in due to its convenient location. A quick survey of the hazy interior, and we realized the oops that we made.

    There was, of course, no provision for getting the word out on a secondary venue this late in the game, so a quick trip to the convenience store for stationery (I always wondered who bought tape and pens at a store next to a bar :) and some rescue signage was put up for the stragglers.

    Oh, wouldn't you know it - our second choice was closed.

    My sympathies to the souls who got lost that day :)

    So thanks, Meetup, for getting us together in the first place... I'm sorry we couldn't stay :)

    -- Ritchie

    --
    Binary geeks can count to 1,023 on their fingers :)
    1. Re:We used it to start with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the venues listed for meeting at were sponsored by local businesses

      That's an interesting thought -- if meetup could plan together with apartment complexes that have meeting areas and work on renting them out it could be a succesful program.

  62. Why would they charge for this? by Stick_Fig · · Score: 1
    This is a service that any person with half a brain and rudimentary experience with PHP could make. Why would they take their service and put a charge on it -- and on the organizer? Nobody's going to want to organize through Meetup anymore, and sites like thefacebook will jump on this territory quickly.



    It was nice while it lasted, Howard Dean followers.

    --
    ShortFormBlog: Writing a little. Saying a lot.
  63. No and for a reason! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Never heard of it before, but I figured I'd peek anyways just for fun...

    In a city of near a half million people here's the top groups:

    Pagan Meetup Group - Meet other local Pagans, Wiccans, Druids, all walks of pagan life - exchange lore, legends and learning. 23 members.

    All I can say is WTF?

    Darren Hayes Meetup Group; 6 members.
    Who the F is that anyways? And why would anyone want to get together to talk about some singner is beyond me.

    Next is a vegan meetup group with a whole 3 members. I see no interest in meeting with people based on what I eat. What's next? A steak eaters group?

    And it just gets worse... Like a psychic meetup group (or is that a group for people who hear voices?), a vampire group, a witches group... Like WTF is up with that?

    Wow! That is one amazingly useless site! I didn't know there were so many mentally retarded people around here, thanks!

    I'd rather just hang with normal people, TY.

    1. Re:No and for a reason! by aichpvee · · Score: 1
      All I can say is WTF?

      I say the same thing every time I see a church.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    2. Re:No and for a reason! by deimtee · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...and with the psychic group they don't even tell you where or when the meetup is.

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    3. Re:No and for a reason! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I never actually mentionned any religion is better or anything of that sort. I'm an atheist and proud of it.

    4. Re:No and for a reason! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Pagan Meetup Group...All I can say is WTF?

      Uhhh...

      the fuck? Or are you not familiar with the neopagan movement? (Which would be odd, since it has a hugely disproportionate presence in the tech sector.)
      Next is a vegan meetup group with a whole 3 members. I see no interest in meeting with people based on what I eat. What's next? A steak eaters group?

      I like to meet other vegans: swap recipies, talk about retaurants, where to find good non-leather shoes, etcetera. But more importantly, I prefer to date vegetarian women. :-)

      I'd rather just hang with normal people, TY.

      How boring. I prefer the company of interesting people, stimulates the brain.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    5. Re:No and for a reason! by blueskies · · Score: 1

      swap recipies, talk about retaurants,where to find good non-leather shoes,

      Vegans eat shoes? yuck.

      Or are you not familiar with the neopagan movement? (Which would be odd, since it has a hugely disproportionate presence in the tech sector.)

      Maybe this should be a slashdot poll? I don't know many people that know about neopaganism. Although, now that you mention it, we did have a company prayer to Odin before our last product release.

    6. Re:No and for a reason! by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1
      Vegans eat shoes? yuck.

      Presuming you're just ignorant and not trolling...

      Veganism is, in the broadest sense, a lifestyle which attempts to minimize suffering caused to sentient beings. It therefore includes finding alternatives to leather in clothing (list is in dire need of updating), as well as using consumer products that are not tested on animals and that do not contain animal-derived ingredients.

      I don't know many people that know about neopaganism

      You probably know more Pagans than you think. Many are in the "broom closet", since in less cosmopolitan areas of the US, admiting to being Pagan or displaying a pentacle makes people think you worship Satan.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  64. Coincidentally by Osmosis_Garett · · Score: 1

    This is the approach that heroin pushers generally take in the movies; the first uses are free, but once you're emotionally invested it begins to cost you.

    1. Re:Coincidentally by textnode · · Score: 1

      ...once you're neuro-chemically invested... :)

  65. Re:well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess I'll have to date-rape the old-fashioned way.

  66. Re:Another Slashdot Advertisement! Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    If you want to bitch about paid ads on Slashdot, call me when the next Roland Piquepaille story is posted.


    Roland gets paid, but I doubt he has to pay ./. With all kinds of stuff from Engadget and other paid webloggers being submitted, they probably just keep a few stories around for when the submissions are thin. Roland doesn't pay, whatever ad gets seen on the article page pays.

  67. It's not just for dating by Jetson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Meetup.com hosted groups for all sorts of reasons, including enthusiast groups for hobbies (slashdot.meetup.com) and support groups for the people and families dealing with disabilities (autism.meetup.com), so to characterize this just pimping the digital date scene is a bit simplistic.

    1. Re:It's not just for dating by Sircus · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is a hobby?

      --
      PenguiNet: the (shareware) Windows SSH client
    2. Re:It's not just for dating by crawling_chaos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hobby is a polite way of saying "addiction" in this case. What we really need is a Slashoholics Anonymous Meetup. Oh, and probably a Doublestorypostaholics Anonymous for certain editors...

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    3. Re:It's not just for dating by metlin · · Score: 1

      > Oh, and probably a Doublestorypostaholics Anonymous for certain editors...

      Yeah, for very large values of certain.

    4. Re:It's not just for dating by elemental23 · · Score: 1

      Slashoholics Anonymous

      What's "Slashohol"?

      --
      I like my women like my coffee... pale and bitter.
    5. Re:It's not just for dating by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      I'll add HumorlessPendantaholics to my list, I suppose...

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
  68. Geo-matching by Jetson · · Score: 3, Informative

    They had geographical searching. You could input your location and interest, and it would tell you where groups were located, starting at your location and working outward. Yahoo groups can't do that. The yahoo and geocities sites are also full of spam, popups and advertising.

    1. Re:Geo-matching by somepunk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and if you live in an area with more than one population center, such as: Minneapolis/St Paul, Fargo/Moorhead, Duluth/Superior, Kansis City KS/MO, etc, each city gets a group. This is fine for big meetups, but all the ones I use are tiny, and pooling them together would actually enable some reasonable attendance from time to time.

      Of course, I could just be a loser for having such unpopular interests (Python, anyone?)

      --
      Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. (Isaac Asimov)
  69. It's only worth something if you paid for it... by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    .. the creed of today ..

    I wonder if marrying counts as a form of payment.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  70. Re:You heard it here first ... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1
    Based on what I've heard, Meetups are usually fairly popular - I don't think many organizers will have a problem with the fee

    They will in some places. Where I live, $19 is enough to take a family of four out to dinner five nights in a row. I can almost guarantee that the Meetups in such places will shrivel up and die, ideally to be replaced by something homegrown.

    --
    "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  71. Standard business plan by indigeek · · Score: 1, Funny

    1) Bait
    2) Switch
    3) Rinse
    4) Repeat
    5) ???
    6) Profit ?

  72. huh? by beforewisdom · · Score: 1
    what ever happened to good ol' goin to clubs, getting drunk, findin a girl, who is as drunk as u, having a good night, and never seein that girl again, mutually?
    What do you mean "what ever happened to ..." ? This is Slasdot, we are the nerds the news is for.
  73. mypeopleconnection by michaeli · · Score: 1

    I just got an email from the guy who organizes a Meetup event that I sometimes go to. He pointed out http://www.mypeopleconnection.com/ as an alternative.

    A quick look at it, and it seems to suffer from a terribly US-centric viewpoint. Their global page has the inspiring text, "My People Connection brings new friends together through a variety of events in cities around the globe ," and yet only lists a handful of cities in the US. Not even any in Canada. I'm not familiar enough with meetup.com to know if their service went outside the borders of the US of A, but this "alternative" seems lacking.

    --


    "this is a really good piece of cantoloupe."
  74. What a brilliant idea!-Pay-Dot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I'm sure local meetup groups will really take off now! Next month maybe they'll finally add the "pay $5 and get kicked in the nuts" service we've all been clamoring for!"

    Wow! That's almost as bad as subscribing to slashdot.

    1. Re:What a brilliant idea!-Pay-Dot. by Servo · · Score: 1

      Subscribing to Slashdot IS paying to get kicked in the nuts.

      --
      A slip of the foot you may soon recover, but a slip of the tongue you may never get over. -Benjamin Franklin
  75. What, $19/month or "small fee"? by Kosi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    On one hand, they talk about having to pay a small fee, but the only numbers they talk about are $9 or $19/month, which are neither even near the small fee they talk about.

    Can someone please clear this up for me?

    1. Re:What, $19/month or "small fee"? by dstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $9 is lunch. $19 is dinner, without the wine.

      Meetup's prices are not unresonable to those that would be using the service. Foisting the charges on one member of the group, however, will likely not go over too well.

      --
      Not every argument requires reduction to absurdity.
  76. Any free replacements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any one knows for a free replacement for host my own group?

  77. like say--- by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    ebay ?

    cause yahoo and amazon auctions do so well..

    your argument holds, until you hit Juggernaught class.. people sell on ebay, cause that's where the buyers are, and people buy on ebay, cause that's where the sellers are...

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  78. Who are we kidding? Google will win by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few months from now, a subtle little link to "meetings.google.com" will pop up on the main search page, and google will completely destroy their technology and convenience the same way they wiped up the floor with mapquest hahahaha

  79. Ridiculous fixed meetup day/time by Happosai · · Score: 1

    For me, the biggest problem with Meetup.com is that the meetup day/time appears to be abitrarily decided by the site, with no way (as far as I can tell) to change it. If there is a group of people with a common interest in close geographical proximity to each other, it makes more sense to schedule a meetup for a day and time that is most convenient to the majority of the people in the group that are likely to attend.

    I run an anime community web site for fans in the North-West of England , and have been organising monthly meetups for over two years. Whilst I generally try to stick to the same schedule for these meetups (last Sunday of every month), I have to be flexible if, for example: the venue we use is not available; it would clash with another event that most of the regulars will be attending (e.g. anime convention); it's on a Bank Holiday weekend; etc.

    Whilst there are anime-related Meetup.com groups in the region that NanimeW (and some other anime communities) covers, I've never seen the point in participating due to the inflexible way the meetups are organised.

    [Happosai]

    1. Re:Ridiculous fixed meetup day/time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the group owner can configure this. At least the group I joined used to have auto-schedules, but since the owner changed he plans the events (after discussion in the forum).

    2. Re:Ridiculous fixed meetup day/time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest problem with my Dining out meetup is that the location changes each month (new restaurant). Meetup will send an e-mail about the next meetup (usually while the current meetup is held), but it is for the same location.

    3. Re:Ridiculous fixed meetup day/time by Kyrene · · Score: 1

      Actually, the organizer has the ability to put up polls and redetermine where and when the group can meet. I've done this a number of times to find the best day and time that people can meet up at.

      --
      Do not disturb. Already disturbed. http://www.teaaddictedgeek.com
  80. A grand new buisness plan by grazzy · · Score: 1

    1) Register freemeetups.com
    2) ???
    3) Profit!

  81. Should Have Been Bought Out When They Could by evileconboy · · Score: 1

    I know that several large media conglomerates had considered buying Meetup.com, but they wanted too much money. If they had been bought out, they could have benefited by leveraging off the social network and the marketing footprint of the larger company, not to mention benefiting from enormous cost savings with respect to tech costs and overhead. They'll get some people to pay fees, like campaigns, maybe for a year, but people with small, untested groups will run away. I wouldn't say they'll be out of business in a year, but they certainly will be forgotten or laughed at. They just don't provide enough value for someone to pay $228/year, and I'm not lonely enough to pay dues for a club that might suck.

  82. How to self destruct, in 4 easy steps. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 3, Insightful


    1) Provide a free service.

    2) Get people to depend on that service. Use poorly designed software.

    3) Then begin charging an extremely high fee for that service. $19 per month??? What could they be thinking? For an automatic, low-bandwidth service? There are many groups that have only 2 or 3 members, and have not attracted more, but hope to attract more later.

    4) Profit? No, go out of business.

  83. As Fonz goes flying over the shark... by Robotech_Master · · Score: 1

    Well, that's pretty much the death knell for meetup. The organizer of one of the local meetup groups just stepped down, not caring to pay $19 a month (or even $9 a month, the "special discount rate" they're offering). And if nobody steps forward to organize a meetup group, "this Meetup Group will be frozen and eventually disbanded."

    It was kind of neat while it lasted, but given that most of the meetups I've tried to visit in my area never really came together for free, I don't think too many people outside of big cities are going to be willing to pay for it. (And I don't even know how many of those will be. Historically, once-free sites suddenly starting to charge big bucks for their content don't tend to do so well.)

    I can understand the need to make money to keep the site alive, the dot-com era being far behind us and all. Still, it's sad to see this service jumping the shark this way. I wonder if it'll still be around a year from now.

    --
    Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    1. Re:As Fonz goes flying over the shark... by LVSlushdat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's certainly the deathnell for the Las Vegas wifi Meetup! I took over as organizer of it about six months ago, when the previous organizer dropped out. He had it being held at a Starbucks, and I moved it to a nearby Coffee Shop with free wifi.. We're probably like many small meetups, 20-30 people actually registered with the group, but only a tiny subset of that who actually come to the the monthly meets. In fact, the last couple of months, It's been me and one other guy showing up. In fact, tonight's the monthly meeting, and after reading this, if the turnouts like usual I'm gonna pull the plug tommorrow.... I certainly am NOT going to pay $9 or $19/mo to these bloodsuckers.. Now, if we had a thriving meetup, and I could get everybody to chip in, maybe.. Goodbye, Meetup.. Greed got ya in the end..

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  84. This part concerns me ... by adzoox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This part of the revision concerns me...

    Can Organizers profit from their Groups?
    Sure, as long as you comply with community standards (and Meetup's Terms of Service).


    As a business owner I don't mind anyone using my facilities for public free use ... but when they turn MY facility in to a paid venue, that concerns me and I'm sure would concern coffee shops and book stores (the most common place for meetups)

    If a group is meeting in my place and it is not sponsored by me, it must be free and inclusive of anyone that wishes to join. If I am sponsoring it, then I have the right to exclude anyone who doesn't want to pay dues.

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:This part concerns me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you're within your rights to say that. However, as a business owner you'd be foolish to do so. The meetup is bringing people to your business who would otherwise not be there at that time on that day. You can make some money from their presence. And, if the members (who didn't pick your venue and may not have previously known about it) like your place, they might well come back.

      You should also consider that they're not "turning your facility into a paid venue". They're charging to be part of the group/event, not to be in your facility. They can't stop you from welcoming other guests to your place: they can only refuse to associate with them. (Which they can do whether or not they're charging their members to be part of their group.)

      I find the new meetup.com fees obnoxious and I've already completed the information architecture for a competing site which I hope to code a substantial chunk of this evening, but I don't see where allowing such groups to visit a business in any way hurts the business.

    2. Re:This part concerns me ... by allpolitics · · Score: 1
      As a business owner I don't mind anyone using my facilities for public free use ... but when they turn MY facility in to a paid venue, that concerns me and I'm sure would concern coffee shops and book stores (the most common place for meetups)

      Actual, paid venues meet in eating establishments all the time. I'm not seeing to big of deal going on here.

      I guess what you are saying is that if you were a coffee shop owner you'd want to have a litmus test for people who purchase from your fine establishment. Did they pay anything to be in that coffee shop with taht group today? No? Well welcome in then. Yes? Oops, can't take any money from you, please don't purchase anything here, see ya later.

      It just doesn't make sense to me.

      If a group is meeting in my place and it is not sponsored by me, it must be free and inclusive of anyone that wishes to join.

      Huh? I've got to let just anyone sit at my table just because I'm eating at a public eating eshtablishment? I've never heard of anything like that before.

      --ap
    3. Re:This part concerns me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a business owner I don't mind anyone using my facilities for public free use ... but when they turn MY facility in to a paid venue, that concerns me and I'm sure would concern coffee shops and book stores (the most common place for meetups)

      I'll need to remember that the next time I schedule a $300-500 business lunch with a client. What did you say your loosing^H^Hsuccessful business was, again?

    4. Re:This part concerns me ... by adzoox · · Score: 1

      Your business meeting is a closed meeting - meaning you are not openly seeking admission or dues and expressly using my business as your only venue.

      and for clarification:

      What is:

      a $300-500 business lunch

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    5. Re:This part concerns me ... by adzoox · · Score: 1

      Whether I know about it or not ... I would choose to have ANY group get clearance from me before charging admission to my venue. Otherwise, I would rather them go somewhere else. (Windfall from their presence or not)

      Some guests may be offended by the topic or dujour the group is involved in.

      Again, if they are meeting for free and maybe someone else overheard and asked to join and was allowed to ... sure it's ok. Even that said, I would demand that you have the respect for my facility and ask in advance to meet there.

      To reply to this and another post ... casual business meetings between less than 4 or so people is NOT what I'm remotely discussing ... nor are you charging admission.

      --
      Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    6. Re:This part concerns me ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The meetup is bringing people to your business who would otherwise not be there at that time on that day

      Who's saying his business isn't full and has all the customers it can handle ... did he say, he had spare room... what if those "meet uppers" are taking space AWAY from customers who want to patronize but don't have the space to move or to sit!

  85. 2004 Innovator of the Year by jellings · · Score: 1

    In 2004, MIT's Technology Review picked meetup.com founder Scott Heiferman as innovator of the year (article text conspicuously absent - some detail here. At the time I couldn't believe he was picked over the accomplishments of so many others. Sure he was able to get 1.4 million users, but that was because the service was free! Sad to see it happen to them; I have always, and always will, question the process by which TR came to their decisions (something to do with the 2004 election hype I'm sure).

    1. Re:2004 Innovator of the Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:2004 Innovator of the Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the venues listed for meeting at were sponsored by local businesses

      And how many 1.4M subscriber companies have you started? Not picking on you, but there's a big attitude on Slashdot of "Oh that's just some PHP and MySql" -- uh yeah. And you have this free time to post on /. as you're a multi millionaire from your dot com company you started, right?

  86. The more intelligent response by ylikone · · Score: 1

    would have been...

    "I got food poisoning once, I never ate at that establishment again."

    You can replace "establishment" with wherever you got the food poisoning. See, in your attempt to make someone else look foolish you ended up making yourself look foolish.

    --
    Meh.
    1. Re:The more intelligent response by jasmusic · · Score: 1

      And you look like the ultimate dunce by completely ignoring or overlooking the context of the message.

  87. The number of "members" is inflated. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Note that most "groups" have a very small number of "members". Also, the number of members is vastly inflated because of a trick. You must become a "member" to get information about where the next meeting will be held. There may be many, many groups with "members" who decided they had no interest in the group, and never visited the group online again, or did anything with the group.

    How many people will pay $228 U.S. each year to try an idea of developing a group? The value of the U.S. dollar is dropping fast because the Bush administration is rapidly borrowing money, but the dollar is not worthless.

    Would you pay $2,280 over ten years to find other people in your area with an interest in a special breed of cats, for example? Especially when you never attract more than 4 people, and some of them are not very interested?

    Also, some groups may have fake members entered by organizers attempting to attract people by making it seem that there is more interest than there really is. I visited one group that showed photos of two very beautiful women who said they were enthusiastic about the group. However, neither of them visited the group again, according to their statistics. A $228 yearly fee makes dishonesty more likely.

    A web site for meetings is a good idea, but we need a non-adversarial method of making that happen.

    This always happens with closed-source, proprietary solutions. Sooner or later the proprietor becomes abusive.

  88. Re:You heard it here first ... by Masami+Eiri · · Score: 1

    $19 for 4 people over 5 nights? Where do you live???

  89. Just like a crack pusher... by IdJit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They get you hooked on the freebies and then get you on the come-back.

    Ah well...only a matter of months before someone comes out with another free version of MeetUp.

    1. Re:Just like a crack pusher... by Suicyco · · Score: 1

      You know where to get free crack?

  90. Umm, those *are* small fees by sczimme · · Score: 1


    the only numbers they talk about are $9 or $19/month, which are neither even near the small fee they talk about.

    A person's definition of "small fee" tends to increase along with disposable income. At the same time, if an individual derives a great amount of utility/enjoyment from $SERVICE, then the fee might be considered small when compared to utility/enjoyment derived (regardless of disposable income), i.e. "bang for the buck".

    (Yes, I combined "bang", "buck", "enjoyment" and "$SERVICE". Please focus.)

    You don't believe the MeetUp fee is money well spent? That's quite all right: spend your money elsewhere, don't spend it at all, do whatever works for you. To each his own and all that. (For the record, I don't use MeetUp either.)

    Cheers!

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Umm, those *are* small fees by Kosi · · Score: 1

      A person's definition of "small fee" tends to increase along with disposable income.

      I know, and because of that I always check such stuff against Joe Average's disposable income. And FTPOV, neither $9 nor $19 / month are small.

      You don't believe the MeetUp fee is money well spent?

      That is irrelevant in matters of the fee being small or not.

  91. More steps commonly taken... by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    Note also that now organizers must give their mailing addresses to Meetup.com.

    More steps commonly taken by proprietary services and manufacturers:

    1) Make a privacy policy assuring all the privacy anyone could want.

    2) Collect a lot of private information.

    3) Change the privacy policy to allow a lack of privacy, because that is more profitable. Include all the people who trusted the old assurances in the new lack-of-privacy policy.

    It's the old, "I mean what I say until I decide I don't mean what I say" trick, and it is legal in the United States, apparently. (Many companies have done this. There was a story on Slashdot about it being legal.)

  92. Re:You heard it here first ... by MMMDI · · Score: 1

    Ninety-five cents per person per dinner? Holy hell, and I thought my local $5 (per person) Chinese Buffet was great.

  93. See ya, meetup by British · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I remember the Livejournal meetups. The very last one i went to was a pure f'in sausagefest. Only one female showed up. The rest consisted of a bunch of guys who didn't look like they could get a date either(okay, one was married).

    This was after me and somebody waited around 2 hours looking for others. After everyone gathered, I realized the oddity that the meetup mainly consisted of mails, from a userbase that was 60% female. Got up and left after 15 minutes and never came back.

    I saw pictures for subsequent lj meetups, and they looked like weight watchers meetings, sorry to say.

    Meetup.com has got to have the worst interface for a website I've seen. It seems to involve several links just to get to your area code's page of events. I signed up for about 10-13 meetups, and just about all of them were cancelled due to lack of interest.

    Countdown to fuckedcompany in 3...2..1...

    1. Re:See ya, meetup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      common man, anyone should know that 95% of the females on the internet are hairy ass men =)

    2. Re:See ya, meetup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realized the oddity that the meetup mainly consisted of mails, from a userbase that was 60% female.

      Step away from the keyboard, you've been in cyberspace too long.

  94. Compare with eBay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eBay is the ultimate cgi-script that generates revenue.

    Compare Meetup with eBay, not Microsoft.

  95. Can you please say FUCK one more time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks, I didn't get the word FUCK enough in your post.

  96. You can do better, "tin foil hat" refs noticed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  97. Already affecting Bookcrossing.com by joelethan · · Score: 1
    There is a deal of noise at Bookcrossing.com who have a link to meetup.com on the front page.

    Like many virtual communities, BXers like to meet in Real Life sometime. Now no-one is going to stump up a monthly fee. Ah well.

    /Joelethan
    Free your books at Bookcrossing.com

  98. Go Kill Yourself Now. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Were you there to talk about Livejournal or were you there to prey on teenage girls? You are so fucking pathetic.

  99. upcoming.org? by jbrw · · Score: 1

    Not that i've really used either, but this seems to fill the same need at meetup and is being actively and aggressively developed at the moment. An API was just released for it, for example.

    It's developed by Andy Baio of waxy.org who has a track record of doing neat things.

  100. Re:You heard it here first ... by Guiness17 · · Score: 1

    Has it not occured to the above 2 posters that this person is obviously not from NA or Europe? Likely India judging by his nick...

    --
    Imagine for a moment a world without hypothetical situations...
  101. Too bad meetup.com was fundamentally flawed... by Otto · · Score: 1

    Meetup.com was/is fundamentally flawed and I thought so from the very beginning.

    The real problem is that the way that meetup's work are too restrictive. So I was registered in a group that had like a thousand members or so, scattered around the US. All these members had some kind of common interest or were members of a forum or what have you, so it was a reasonably good group of people who wanted to meet each other.

    The idea of meetup.com was to, once a month, send a meetup invite to everybody in some geographic area. Unfortunately, we were scattered, as most random selections of people are, and unless you could get 3 or more people to confirm, the meetup got cancelled. And you couldn't get information on other cities meetups. And you couldn't schedule your own meetup time/place.

    In other words, meetup.com took all the work that you didn't need it to take. People are quite capable of scheduling meetings. People are quite capable of picking places. What people need help with is:
    -Notifying other interested people.
    -Getting RSVPs and such.
    -Resolving schedule conflicts.

    If meetup had allowed people to select areas that they wanted to monitor for meetups, and have it email/notify them whenever somebody has a meetup in that area (perhaps for the given group only), and then an easy way to send an reply saying they'll be there... that would be perfect. That's all that's needed. Also add the ability to see all meetups regardless of area or in a given area.

    When people in my group wanted to have a national meeting, they resorted to forums and email. Why? Because meetup.com was fucking useless for real world meetings. It only created artificial once a month meetings that usually never actually occurred.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Too bad meetup.com was fundamentally flawed... by Kyrene · · Score: 1
      Those flaws have long been fixed. Whoever volunteers to be an organizer can reschedule the meetup places AND dates/times, and even set up polls to determine what arrangement works best for the majority of people.

      Ironically enough, many emails have gone out to members of the meetup.com groups, asking for "volunteers" to be an organizer. And I can say that as an organizer of two small groups, it's a thankless job--and even more thankless to be *PAYING* to do all of that work. Why should I pay to stick my neck out and get people to show up to events? Or worse yet, expect people to show up and pay a fee to help me out? What if only two people show? What about all of the "maybes"? What if you create an event and only one out of three people who RSVPed show up?

      All in all, the only option I see at present is to create a Yahoogroup, send out the link to current members, and resign as the organizer of the current meetup group. This of course means that I'll have the aggravation of running the emailing list, approving new members, setting new folks to moderated to weed out spammers, and I don't have time for that. I run too many emailing lists as is. Meetup.com eliminated spammers and the need to approve of new subscribers and posts in order to arrange a convenient way to get a bunch of people together who didn't know each other and meet somewhere locally. Now that's gone, hopefully someone will step up and take their place.

      --
      Do not disturb. Already disturbed. http://www.teaaddictedgeek.com
    2. Re:Too bad meetup.com was fundamentally flawed... by Otto · · Score: 1

      Those flaws have long been fixed. Whoever volunteers to be an organizer can reschedule the meetup places AND dates/times, and even set up polls to determine what arrangement works best for the majority of people.

      No, those flaws have not been fixed. There have been features added to the system to allow you to kinda/sorta modify the existing meetups that it generates, but the underlying "meetup of everybody local every so often" is still built in. It never should have been there, and they should have removed it. Essentially it's spamming all the members once every month or so, which is more than enough to cause most people to remove their name from the service entirely.

      Meetup.com eliminated spammers and the need to approve of new subscribers and posts in order to arrange a convenient way to get a bunch of people together who didn't know each other and meet somewhere locally.

      The thing is that if I want to meet a bunch of people I don't know, I can go outside and go to a bar. Most scheduled meetings in the online world are desired by people who do "know" each other, via forums or whatever, but want to get together to meet each other in meatspace. Meetup.com had the potential to cater to that, and they threw it away.

      I've gone to many online-people-I-know-meetings, but I dumped meetup.com after the first 3 monthly spams. The idea of meeting people with similar interests is great, but there's no need for meetup.com to bring those people together, and there never was. Those people are already brought together elsewhere, meetup.com should have made it easier for them to arrange to meet one another. It tried to do too much, and ended up not doing anything well.

      And the "be an organizer" functionality is still inherently flawed itself. The whole point of having an automated service like this is for the service itself to be the organizer. Nobody likes doing this sort of thing, and it's really unnecessary for anybody to do it at all. The machine can do it well enough to suit most people's needs. It needs to take dates from everybody as to when they're available, decide on a date, let the people pick places, maybe handle voting on places, and essentially finalize the whole shebang. As for money making, the opportunities for marketing within these confines are endless. Having a national meeting? Suggest hotels. Having a local or regional meeting? Suggest local restaurants/bars. And so forth.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    3. Re:Too bad meetup.com was fundamentally flawed... by Kyrene · · Score: 1
      The thing is that if I want to meet a bunch of people I don't know, I can go outside and go to a bar.

      While I do not necessarily disagree with you completely, I myself have very little in common with your average bar goer. I don't know about you personally, however. I am much more likely to go to a scifi or anime meetup and meet people with whom I can have an interesting conversation with, versus guys attempting to ask me my sign or chat me up regarding the last Survivor show, when I could care less about 99% of what passes for entertainment on television.

      The idea of meeting people with similar interests is great, but there's no need for meetup.com to bring those people together, and there never was. Those people are already brought together elsewhere, meetup.com should have made it easier for them to arrange to meet one another.

      Where? In my area, news to me. I guess I have to envy whatever geographical location that you have that you can automatically find people who are already meeting up for whatever interests you currently happen to possess.

      Meetup.com worked for me when I was new to the area, and in a lot of ways still does. I meet up with a lot of people who otherwise I wouldn't have met. I've heard of people saying that Yahoogroups is an alternative, and frankly it isn't. You have to deal with spammers on a regular basis and/or moderate new members to be certain that you're free from them. If the list gets huge, you'll have to find other people to help out in that moderation or face moderating it on a fairly regular basis. I moderate two lists, one with 200+ people and another with 400+, so I have a pretty good idea of what goes into moderating a list, and it is MUCH of more of pain in the ass than being a meetup.com organizer, as much of a thankless job as it is.

      --
      Do not disturb. Already disturbed. http://www.teaaddictedgeek.com
  102. Argh..... by dep01 · · Score: 1

    About a year before this site opened, I considered developing the exact same idea for the website (kicks self in ass over and over again).

    --
    "hey, could you pass me a paper towel? er.. I mean... DEPLOY ABSORBTION PANEL!"
  103. Re:You heard it here first ... by Pantero+Blanco · · Score: 1

    Most likely India, though the same amount of money would feed a family in Mexico for about the same length of time.

  104. This is way more interesting :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.meet2cheat.com

  105. Add in large # of employees and VC funds... by DoctoRoR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just like everybody else here, I'm wondering what possessed Meetup.com to charge this much money, and to make the volunteer organizer responsible for the bill. Then I took a look at the size of the company.

    Anyone else think 26 full-time employees, a full board of directors, and apparent VC funds are overkill for a company like this? Sure, they bring a lot of value added features to organizing local groups, but this isn't an amazingly difficult web app, and with VC funding on board, you just know the target valuation will force aggressive community-killing fees.

    Charging a flat high fee for groups of any size makes no sense. This will be another good idea, bad execution dot-com failure. If they have to charge those kinds of rates, it's clear that they didn't bootstrap the company in a judicious manner. It's too bad, because they provide a nice service. Evite.com will probably get some of their refugees.

  106. My initial thoughts - vary the pricing scheme. by Dieppe · · Score: 1
    Because a lot of what Meetup does is basically send out email to members about an upcoming "meetup", and the bandwidth varys depending on the size of the group, I felt that they should make a graduated scale similar to below:

    1-10 members: Free
    10-20 members: $2
    20-50 members: $5
    50-100 members: $10
    100 members: $20

    Unless disk space is their huge cost problem, having 20,000 5 member groups... but I suspect that isn't the case.

    This way small groups don't shrivel up and die.. and if you've got up to 20 members even the most willing moderator could pony up $2 a month. If you're getting a LOT of members showing up, why not be able to ask for a buck or two to help.. rather than sticking it to the 3 people that show up once a month?

  107. Free alternative by Corwin01 · · Score: 1

    Never heard of them, but I've been using OKCupid.com for ahwile now. If you remember TheSpark.com from back in the day, its the same people who ran it, so aside from the romance potential, you also have a bunch of funny tests and personality analysis. Its a good way to kill time if you're bored, heh.

  108. Campaign finance laws? by mehtajr · · Score: 1

    One of Meetup's biggest uses was organizing meetings during the campaign season-- I know every Democratic presidential candidate had meetups. Now that you have to pay, these seem like they may run afoul of the campaign finance rules that require out-of-pocket expenses to be reported to the FEC as donations in-kind.

  109. name change? by mapmaker · · Score: 2, Funny

    So are they going to change their name to PayUp.com?

  110. upcoming.org by miruku · · Score: 1

    i'd advised people looking for an alternative to check out upcoming.org. from the site itself: "Upcoming.org is a collaborative event calendar, completely driven by people like you. Enter in the events you're attending, comment on events entered by others, and syndicate event listings to your own weblog". it also uses restapi for inputting events and has syndication for specific venues and locations which is great for integration with other sites.

    --
    MilkMiruku
  111. Maybe Meetup knows something we don't. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1


    It is simply amazing how bad is the management of technically oriented companies.

    Or maybe Meetup knows something we don't. Some of the groups will pay the $228/year until they can make other arrangements. So, Meetup will have a sudden influx of money. Maybe they know that Meetup will die, and just want to extract as much money as possible before that happens.

    If you have a group, the best thing is to have a web site for your group. Then you aren't dependent on whatever sink-the-company idea someone has this month.

  112. Umm... this is /. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what ever happened to good ol' goin to clubs, getting drunk, findin a girl, who is as drunk as u, having a good night, and never seein that girl again, mutually?

    What do you mean whatever happened to that? This is /.. People here don't do that, never have, and never will... leave their parents basement.

  113. In desperate times and suffering a Slashdotting?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cruel....real cruel.

  114. It got replaced by TOOTHING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what ever happened to good ol' goin to clubs, getting drunk, findin a girl, who is as drunk as u, having a good night, and never seein that girl again, mutually?

    It got replaced by toothing.

  115. Upcoming.org seems like a good free alternative by Jon_Aquino · · Score: 1

    Haven't tried it yet (just signed up), but a Technorati search shows that Upcoming.org has been recommended by some as being a good alternative to Meetup.com. The front page says "Upcoming.org is, and always will be, free."

  116. GOTO meetin.org instead!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    evyone move? they chaging $ hear?

    go http://www.meetin.org/

  117. Re:min0s 4, Troll) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Says 'Be right back'. I've been waiting here for 5 days.