Slashdot Mirror


Daleks Return to Dr Who

Jim Hall writes "An article on the BBC says that a Dalek will return to Dr Who, in an episode titled simply 'Dalek'. The Doctor discovers that a Dalek has been collected by an unsuspecting billionaire. Many of the perceived weaknesses of the Daleks have been addressed: Stairs have not been a problem for Daleks since 1988, when they first levitated towards Sylvester McCoy in Remembrance of the Daleks. The new Dalek can also spin its torso independently of his head, so creeping up from behind is no longer an option. Its trademark 'sink plunger' attachment also reveals a terrifying new function. 'Dalek' is on BBC-1 on Saturday, 30 April."

239 of 339 comments (clear)

  1. Sink plunger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Its trademark 'sink plunger' attachment also reveals a
    > terrifying new function.

    Is it just me or does that sound terrifyingly sexual?

    1. Re:Sink plunger? by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 2

      Is it just me or does that sound terrifyingly sexual?

      You mean like this?

      WARNING: Not safe for work. lol.

    2. Re:Sink plunger? by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damnit, I screwed up the URL. lol.

      I meant this!

      WARNING: still not safe for work. ;)

    3. Re:Sink plunger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      google for 'gay daleks'...

    4. Re:Sink plunger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      From TFA:
      "You would be amazed at the number of people who wanted to get inside the Dalek," says Edwards

      For Christ's sake, this is supposed to be a family show, not alt.sex.daleks
    5. Re:Sink plunger? by runlvl0 · · Score: 1
      > Its trademark 'sink plunger' attachment also reveals a terrifying new function.
      Is it just me or does that sound terrifyingly sexual?
      You're not the only one: on first reading, I thought it said "stink plunger"
      --

      Carthago delenda est!
    6. Re:Sink plunger? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1, Funny

      > > Its trademark 'sink plunger' attachment also reveals a
      > > terrifying new function.

      > Is it just me or does that sound terrifyingly sexual?

      "White wee-wee!"

      "Exsperminate!"

      Bring back the Gay Daleks!. Hmm...

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    7. Re:Sink plunger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      (+1, Troll)

    8. Re:Sink plunger? by elmarkitse · · Score: 1

      Although I think you're right on most counts, you've clearly forgotten that toilet humor is still funny.

    9. Re:Sink plunger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > Its trademark 'sink plunger' attachment also reveals a
      > terrifying new function.

      Is it just me or does that sound terrifyingly sexual?


      You mean, NYPD sexual, or something else?

    10. Re:Sink plunger? by bechthros · · Score: 4, Insightful

      a) the fact that the picture has been published without the publisher being sued into oblivion shows clearly that the woman in the picture was perfectly content to pose for, and profit from, it's publication

      b) most male geeks don't get laid because we're not good looking. never forget SNL's three rules for getting dates: be handsome. be attractive. don't be unattractive. BTW a lot of female geeks don't get laid either.

      c) women are superior to men in some ways, men are superior to women in others, and neither could survive without the other. anybody who tells you all of one group is always superior to all of another group, especially when dealing with groups as large as all men and all women, is either very very dangerous or selling something.

      d) you have a massive male-guilt complex and I don't envy you it, assuming you're even a man, which i somehow doubt from your SCUM manifesto-ish tone

      e) the people who would really disempower women (in other words, dangerous fascists like you) are the ones who would deny them the right to pose for pictures like this if they wanted to. this is america, asshole, you have no right to deny others' humor or entertainment no matter how much you disagree with it, as long as nobody's being hurt. you either have free speech or you don't. where would you draw the line? do women have no right to participate in, and profit from, the production of pornography? do they have the right to "degrade themselves" by telling off-color jokes? by wearing pants? have fun sliding down that slippery slope.

      f) it's probably just photoshop anyway

      g) let the PC modbombing begin, i'm not posting this anon because i'd like there to be some record that i'm not a knee-jerk leftist, karma be damned.

      h) i'm thrilled to see the return of the daleks. or at least a dalek. i've always harbored a sneaking suspicion bill gates has one hidden away somewhere. now all that needs to happen is for some villain to somehow "borrow" a tardis, go back and grab davros, bring him to this one renegade dalek and have him close it, etc etc...

      i) daleks still aren't as cool as cybermen, even if (and perhaps because) they did kill adric.

    11. Re:Sink plunger? by TWX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Based on what I've seen (used to frequent the Goth scene and go to RHPS for years) you're probably right. Hell, they might not have even gotten paid.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    12. Re:Sink plunger? by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      For Christ's sake, this is supposed to be a family show, not alt.sex.daleks

      Experiment
      Experiment
      EXPERIMENT!

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    13. Re:Sink plunger? by bechthros · · Score: 3, Interesting

      oh, don't get me wrong, i'm definitely a leftist. just not a knee-jerk one. that is to say, i have liberal values, but i don't let others manipulate me into things like censorship with them. i remember in the 80's when self-purported "liberals" thought it'd be great to have copies of huck finn purged from all public schools because they used the word "nigger". never mind that the novel was set in the mid 1800's and had a very anti-racism message. they burned the books anyway - nobody who burns books is a liberal. period.

      i'd be completely against the photo if it was taken against the woman's will, or was of a minor, etc etc. but i've seen a lot of women do a lot more offensive things than pose for a photo of them with a plunger that may or may not be photoshopped in on their face. this was clearly consensual, and as a leftist i don't believe anything that goes on between consenting adults should be illegal.

      BTW, has anybodye else figured out that now that daleks are made of gold, a dalek-cyberman war would be MUCH more interesting?

    14. Re:Sink plunger? by bechthros · · Score: 3, Insightful

      let me clarify - where I'm posting from, this is America. if you're unlucky enough to live in a part of the world where people can't at least pay lip service to freedom of expression, my sympathies. regardless of location, consent is consent is consent. the minute you say a woman has no right to pose for this picture if she chooses too, you disempower her more than the picture ever would.

    15. Re:Sink plunger? by khallow · · Score: 1
      BTW, has anybodye else figured out that now that daleks are made of gold, a dalek-cyberman war would be MUCH more interesting?

      That may be why daleks are made of gold.

    16. Re:Sink plunger? by drsquare · · Score: 1

      That is not a funny picture in the least. It is terribly misogynist. It is not a wonder that most geeks do not get laid. At least I learned how to treat women and have had several long term relationships and friendships with women over the years. Odd that I just cannot relate to most men at all. Sports are stupid. I do not drink alcohol. Yes, I like porn, but only if it is uplifting to women and focuses on them experiencing sexual pleasure. I guess I am the model of the man of the future. Anyone who disagrees with me is obviously a dinosaur from a different time. Let us face facts, women are superior in many ways and therefore can demand respect from men. Images like the above only serve to prove that women have a point when they say most men are immature. If you thik about it, the picture is nothing more than toilet humor. How sophmoric.

      I think you mods are being a bit harsh, that's quite a funny troll and deserves to be seen by a wider audience.

    17. Re:Sink plunger? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      See 'Gay Daleks': mini screenshot, article.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    18. Re:Sink plunger? by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      a) the fact that the picture has been published without the publisher being sued into oblivion shows clearly that the woman in the picture was perfectly content to pose for, and profit from, it's publication

      Or she's unaware that a picture was taken at all, or she's unaware the sorority prank made it to the net, or (get this) she's got a sense of humor.

      b) most male geeks don't get laid because

      Wrong already. The ones that get laid just don't speak up because the stereotype is almost as funny as the people which believe it and try to make rational arguments with it. (There is a surprisingly strong correlation between the second crowd and people which never realize that it might just be that the girl had a sense of humor.)

      c) ... , d) ... , e)

      Oh, shut up. You're the same person that thinks that movies lead to violence, aren't you? Racist jokes don't lead to racism. Anyone which turns racist because of a joke or a book or a movie was already pretty much there, and any little thing could have tipped them over; it's not the joke or the book or the movie's fault. Talk to the idiot's parents, not the person trying to tell them jokes.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    19. Re:Sink plunger? by Wingit · · Score: 1

      RHPS - Royal Air Force Homing Pigeon Service ?

      --
      We win together or suffer without.
  2. I can exclusively reveal by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    The terrifying new feature is a dupe checker for /.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  3. Scary things, these daleks. by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 5, Funny

    "But there were a lot of shots which had to be re-done because the Dalek got stuck in a doorway."

    Well there's an enemy that has me scared.

    1. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by fm6 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, not the most convincing bad guys. But remember that before it became late-night PBS fare, Dr. Who was a kiddie show, and thus couldn't make its horrors too conspicuously horrible. The main selling point of the Daleks was not that they were scary, but that it was a lot of fun to march down the streek, one arm pointing directly in front of you, and screaming in a high-pitched voice, "EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!"

    2. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It obviously scared the hell out of a lot of game AI coders, they've been implementing that characteristic perfectly for years.

    3. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by spockette · · Score: 4, Funny

      I may be alone in this, but I'm scared of the Daleks. I saw an episode of DW when I was about five, and I had nightmares about Daleks for YEARS afterward. I'm pathetic, I know.

    4. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by Amiga+Lover · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh not so much - I was perhaps 12 when I saw an episode (the name escapes me) with a robotic maggot thing that bit people on the arm and gave them green pulsing glowing veins until they were cured.

      I remember little more than that from those episodes, and it's the reason I'm STILL apprehensive about What Might Be Under The Bed :)

    5. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by joFFeman · · Score: 3, Informative

      that would be the green death. go find the dvd and come to terms with your fears.

      --
      "Life is great; without it, you'd be dead." -Harmony Korine
    6. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by cruachan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apparently, when I was about 5 or 6 I was so scared of Daleks I didn't just hide behind the sofa, I actually used to run to the end of out back garden when they appeared and hide out for the rest of the episode.

      And I do still remember those green glowing maggoty things as really yuck. I've had a real parania about maggots ever since.

    7. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by Angostura · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're thinking about Doctor Who and the green death. A very scary story, which if I remember correctly involved a computer running a company that pumped out toxic waste that caused these nasty mutant maggots. One bite and you died as the green glowing stuff slowly grew up you arm.

      Let's see... a yes here we are.

      Scared the willies out of me, as did the daleks. Oddly though, it was The Master that always scared me most.

    8. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by jd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Your average Dalek taskforce has nukes, time machines, radiation-proof armor, the ability to remotely brainwash people, pure evilness, the propensity to massacre in order to control populations. They even tried to extract the Earth's core in order to turn the Earth into a gigantic warship.


      Is it just me, or does this sound awfully familiar?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    9. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're all things George Bush claims Saddam could do in 45 minutes?

    10. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by markw · · Score: 1

      And in fact in Saturday's episode the villain tried to dupe the world into handing over permission to start a nuclear war by claiming there were aliens with "massive weapons of destruction" that could be "launched within 45 seconds". And all this in the middle of an election campaign, too.

    11. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      My housemate and I have a theory that the BBC was issuing it's own little "fuck you" to the government over them Andrew Gilligan.

    12. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by BluedemonX · · Score: 1

      No, he's thinking of Cybermats, which also caused that cheesy 70s effect.

      Probably Return of the Cybermen...

      --

      --- Jump!! Fire!! Bullet time!! - Lego version of the Matrix
    13. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by a1englishman · · Score: 1
      but that it was a lot of fun to march down the streek, one arm pointing directly in front of you, and screaming
      Thanks for reminding me of fond memories. Genesis of the Daleks scared the hell out of me, but I too marched around with my friends, pretending to be a Dalek.
    14. Re:Scary things, these daleks. by fm6 · · Score: 1

      That's why small kids love to be scared. When you're small and helpless, and the whole world is a strange place, making scary things into a game can be very comforting.

  4. Radio interviews by RonnyJ · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's been known for a fair while about the return of the Daleks - Eccleston has said in radio interviews that they will appear in this next (the 6th) episode, and that they will also have a part to play elsewhere in the current series (although he has been somewhat vague on the details).

    1. Re:Radio interviews by code601 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They should make an entire series, DR who vs daleks

    2. Re:Radio interviews by Daxx_61 · · Score: 1

      Indeed - check out the websites of most fan clubs, wikipedia, and even the bbc website if you're interested - http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/

      This is old news.

      --
      Quoth the server, "404."
    3. Re:Radio interviews by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      http://www.tvtome.com/tvtome/servlet/GuidePageServ let/showid-34391/epid-407904/

      If you want to know what episode. It may contain spoilers if you don't like to know what future episodes will be about.

  5. The more things change... by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Funny

    "We have taken all the perceived weaknesses of the Dalek and made them deadly" - Mike Tucker, miniature effects supervisor

    Well, they used to be deadly, too. It's just they were deadly for the Dalek, not for it's opponent.

  6. What I wonder is... by halivar · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is it about the typical English psyche that finds the image of giant saltshakers so horrifying?

    1. Re:What I wonder is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Its the fear of the ugly little monster you never really see sitting inside it: Doctor Who usually does a slow reveal on its monsters to avoid showing what they really look like (usually an episode 1 cliffhanger) but for the daleks this has been forty years and still no clear look at anything but the travel machine.

      Also, IMHO, there's something scary about a race that have no hands, but because they have an integrated gun they can still function as a society by intimidating other life forms.

    2. Re:What I wonder is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Simple,,
      Most english folk are reincarated snails.

    3. Re:What I wonder is... by TelJanin · · Score: 2, Informative

      for the daleks this has been forty years and still no clear look at anything but the travel machine.

      Yes there was.

    4. Re:What I wonder is... by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Funny

      What is it about the typical English psyche that finds the image of giant saltshakers so horrifying?

      Dude, didn't you see it? Not only is it a giant salt shaker, it's made of gold. GOLD! Nothing can stop gold! And what are those little bulbs on the outside? Those could be anything! They might be filled with death itself, for all we know. That giant lever? I'm going to assume that plays a random clip from Walker, Texas Ranger.

      But even Cordell Walker himself couldn't stop these things from shaking the salt of death on it's enemy. Oh, no. Maybe Walker could take a Dalek, but only if he enlisted the help of that black Texas Ranger and possibly the younger man & woman Texas Rangers, too. But that's only if the Dalek hasn't taken Walker's wife hostage.

      I predict: many drop kicks in the next Dr. Who episode.

    5. Re:What I wonder is... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know your joking, but when the dalek's first made an appearance on the show they were made out to be these cold, unfeeling, utterly ruthless beings. I remember when I was a kid the fact they will kill anyone who got in their way without question was pretty frightening.

    6. Re:What I wonder is... by GWTPict · · Score: 1

      We were kids. They were deeply, deeply scary shit.

    7. Re:What I wonder is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What is it about the typical English psyche that finds the image of giant saltshakers so horrifying?

      It's related to the thing in the American psyche that makes space aliens be humans with wrinkly foreheads.

    8. Re:What I wonder is... by Mancat · · Score: 3, Funny

      This thing looks like R2D2's gay cousin from the Big City.

      --
      hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
    9. Re:What I wonder is... by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "...the fact they will kill anyone who got in their way without question was pretty frightening"

      Like US military patrols on the streets of Iraq.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    10. Re:What I wonder is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What is it about the typical English psyche that finds the image of giant saltshakers so horrifying?

      Probably the same thing that makes them afraid to use a toothbrush.

    11. Re:What I wonder is... by Anonymous+Monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it is the same thing that made the Borg scary, way back in the day. One face, one voice, no individuality. They can't be scard, they can't be talked out of what they do, therefore they are unstopable. Deeply scary is corect

      --
      We are the Borg...
    12. Re:What I wonder is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      oh HAHAHA ORIGINAL. With all these lame stereotypes, you'd think you were perpetuating a stereotype of the dumbass american who doesn't know anything of the outside world... but seeing as this is /., I'll get modded down for saying that, so AMERICA RULES EVERY OTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD SUCKS

    13. Re:What I wonder is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm sorry to pick your fleas here, but we're re-incarroted snails.

    14. Re:What I wonder is... by jimmy · · Score: 1

      I swear its got nothing to do with this

    15. Re:What I wonder is... by halivar · · Score: 1

      Or it's option #3: I was joking, and you and your parent poster are too stuffy and snobbish to have a sense of humor.

      Lighten up, people. After all, what good is avoiding salt if your irascibility still drives your blood pressure through the roof?

      Cheerio!

    16. Re:What I wonder is... by Zey · · Score: 5, Informative
      Lets see...
      1. They're symbolic of the results of nuclear war (particularly terrifying in 1963 when they were introduced, just after the Cuban Missile Crisis proved how close nuclear war could have been).
      2. General fear of the unknown; what mutant lurks inside the Dalek travel machine. It took a few stories before they were shown. Even then, they're generally only seen briefly.
      3. Fears of biological and genetic engineering, classic Frankenstein losing control of a creation story.
      4. Stories involving Davros also add the fear of fascism, the seductiveness of evil and warns of the dangers of logic and self-preservation over ethics and humanity.
      5. The 'next generation' seen in Revelation of the Daleks added the question: what if you went to sleep and woke up with only your head and turning into a Dalek hybrid?
      Unfortunately, not a lot of that was seen in the Tom Baker era, apart from Genesis... just a lot of Tom causing them to get confused and explode by dropping a hat on their eye-stalk, or yell "Exterminate!" a lot, which really cheapened them as villains.
    17. Re:What I wonder is... by alib001 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Looks like Davros has been on Pimp My Ride.

    18. Re:What I wonder is... by mikael · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It was probably the fear of evolution into unemotional machines, world war, mutation from radiation, and the ability to replace parts of the human body with machines. The latter concept was greatly extended upon by the "Cybermen", who fought off disease and old age by replacing the failing parts of their bodies with robotics, until everything from their hearts to minds was machine.
      From HypnosInMedia

      The Doctor's first and most persistent enemy. Created by the mad scientist Davros, they were the descendants of the Kaleds from the planet Skaros. When centuries of nuclear war caused mutations in the race, Davros encouraged the mutations and designed the travel shells they use. He also gave them their unstoppable thirst for conquest. Their chilling cry of "Exterminate!" was feared throughout the galaxy.

      The Daleks would eventually come to realize that they were imperfect, mainly because of their many failures at conquering the galaxy, and they would seek out and eventually be led by their creator, Davros.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    19. Re:What I wonder is... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Hah, suck on my "+5 Funny" Mr Butter. If that is your real name.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    20. Re:What I wonder is... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Dude, didn't you see it? Not only is it a giant salt shaker, it's made of gold. GOLD!"

      I always wondered why the Daleks never got into it with the Cybermen.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    21. Re:What I wonder is... by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "It's related to the thing in the American psyche that makes space aliens be humans with wrinkly foreheads."

      That's not American psyche, that's budget control. When Gene Rodenberry, for example, pitched Star Trek, one of the selling points was that the budget wouldn't grow out of control because the aliens would simply be makeup tricks on humans.

      Star Trek, in particular, is lengendary in it's effeciency with money. The 'bumpy headed alien' is one of the reasons why.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    22. Re:What I wonder is... by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      Star Trek, in particular, is lengendary in it's effeciency with money.

      I can build you SIX full Dalek props for the less than the cost of applying Michael Dorn's forhead ONCE.

    23. Re:What I wonder is... by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      If he had been there would be a plasma screen and a playstation in the back somewhere.

      Along with built in equipment for Davros' favourite hobby.

      And a flame paint job.

      Davros: "When I used to go cruising, people used to pick on me for my blind crippled body, and my face that looked like a pruned up version of The Master. I used to get kicked around until I had to yell HAVE PITY ON ME! Now I have confidence built into my ride. And a death ray. And a pingpong table. Thanks MTV Pimp My Ride!"

    24. Re:What I wonder is... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Dude, why you made me a foe? I was being funny, I got a genuine laugh out of your post because its sadly true. Damn mods should of modded me offtopic not troll!

    25. Re:What I wonder is... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      I get that problem too.

      But since you've made clear that you arnt an idiot, I'll change that. The system has worked :)

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    26. Re:What I wonder is... by nickco3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The funniest thing about "horrible British food" jokes is it's always Americans, of all people, that make them.

      Coming from French or the Italians it would just be standard "my country is better than yours". But from Americans? Americans! The country whose major contribution to world cuisine is the supersize portion?

      Who says Americans don't appreciate irony?

      --
      -- Nick "Hallo this is Beel Gates, und I pronounce weendows as ... WEENdows"
    27. Re:What I wonder is... by bheer · · Score: 1

      And now that we're all jaded with the cheap-looking effects, I hear the next season of Dr Who will feature 'evolved' Daleks who look indistinguishable from human beings and whose female forms are horny like cats.

      Or maybe I've been too much BSG lately...

    28. Re:What I wonder is... by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I know you get the same problem, I checked and read your comment history... :)

    29. Re:What I wonder is... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      But of course, Tom Baker was only ever in two Dalek serials: "Genesis" and the relatively awful "Destiny of the Daleks." In fact, in the last 30 years there have only been five stories featuring Daleks, total.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    30. Re:What I wonder is... by harmlessdrudge · · Score: 1

      Whatever it is they are flattered by imitation. Seems to me that R2D2 and C3pio are sugared shades of the daleks and the cybermen!

    31. Re:What I wonder is... by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      America has one of the riches epicurean traditions on Earth, thanks. We've got immigrants from six more countries than actually exist on Earth, and they all brought their cuisines; the pastiche of cuisines which has erupted as a result is nothing short of fantastic.

      Besides, you eat spotted dick, and that's not what irony is.

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    32. Re:What I wonder is... by shog9 · · Score: 1

      Heh...
      Get out of the fast food block, visit some real restaurants/lunch counters/delis. McD's is everywhere, but that doesn't mean that's all there is.

      And for what it's worth, i've enjoyed most British foods i've eaten (with the exception of Marmite). But none have compared to a good Chicago dog, a well-made caesar salad, or real Texas bbq. IMHO, of course.

    33. Re:What I wonder is... by Golias · · Score: 1

      This thing looks like R2D2's gay cousin from the Big City.

      No, that would be C3PO.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    34. Re:What I wonder is... by nickco3 · · Score: 1

      No, no, no! We aren't discussing facts, this is the cultural stereotypes corner.

      --
      -- Nick "Hallo this is Beel Gates, und I pronounce weendows as ... WEENdows"
    35. Re:What I wonder is... by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      You should see the moderation history of that post. For every one that mods it -1 overrated or -1 flamebait it gets a +1 insightful or +1 funny.

      It now appears to be sitting at +5 insightful. I don't think it was truly an insightful post though...

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    36. Re:What I wonder is... by Zey · · Score: 1
      You seem to have the disadvantage of being an American. Everyone else knows the series began in 1963, not 1975.

      1. The Daleks
      2. Dalek Invasion of Earth
      3. The Daleks' Master Plan
      4. The Power of the Daleks
      5. Day of the Daleks
      6. Death to the Daleks
      7. Genesis of the Daleks
      8. Destiny of the Daleks
      9. Resurrection of the Daleks
      10. Revelation of the Daleks
      11. Remembrance of the Daleks
      12. Dalek

      The above only includes the TV episodes, not the audio dramas.

  7. This could be really good... by cliffski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah doctor who was fairly crap, the acting bad, the scripts dire, the special effects a joke... But in terms of concepts it was actually pretty good.
    I remember the first time I read the story of genesis of the daleks, in some book, before there were repeats or DVDs of the episodes. Maybe I was young, maybe I was drunk, but its actually a pretty grim, depressing and scary story. The whole idea of the war on skaro being so endless, so destructive, and some maniac scientist deciding that instead of fighting the mutations, he just had to 'roll with it' and see what they would turn into... Its all pretty heavy stuff, carried on into dr who and the daleks, where they are convinced they will never ever be able to leave the dalek machines because they basically fucked up their own planet. The potential for the daleks to be scary is certainly still there, if you can suspend disbelief on the stairs thing.
    My fingers are crossed that this will be a really good episode, handeled well.

    --
    DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    1. Re:This could be really good... by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

      What would be really good is if the Daleks became sez crazed machines. Just to hear all the daleks chanting for-ni-kate in their little dalek voices would be priceless.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:This could be really good... by Zey · · Score: 1
      I read that as: "What would be really good is if the Daleks became Pez crazed machines."

      Now there's a marketing gimmick waiting to happen...

    3. Re:This could be really good... by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      I have to say I am looking forward to the episode. I never got into the original Dr. Who, but this version is much better and has a great deal of potential. Kind of like the new battlestar galactica which stomps all over the original. Maybe with the crash of ST Enterprise we may actually start to see some good sci-fi. There is actually a wealth of old shows that could be reborn with modern equipment and effect. Maybe some of the old Gerry Anderson shows (but not that god awful space 1999). None the less, bring on the golden salt shakers with the tinny voices!

    4. Re:This could be really good... by Badfysh · · Score: 1
      Have you not seen the new Captain Scarlet?

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    5. Re:This could be really good... by Bullfish · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking about UFO which I liked as a kid (when I saw it as an adult I realized how truly bad it was). Updated it could be quite good.

    6. Re:This could be really good... by dahlek · · Score: 1
      I thought the acting was on-par, but of course the effects were horrible - but you are correct, that was a very nicely done story.

      I always laughed at the over-dramatic and slow-moving aliens too - it was almost like Twilight Zone mixed with a cheesy horror flick...

      The first episode of the new Dr. Who was really good for about 20 minutes, and then turned to shait when the trash can swallowed up the boyfriend. It seemed that in the old series, at least the Tom Baker era, they didn't bend over backwards to try and make it "funny"...

      Welp, I've kept watching, and it's got potential...I think 40 some-odd minutes is too short, but the last two episodes were connected via a "to be continued", if they do that often, it could work.

      If they can balance the "cheese factor" (which is needed for Dr. Who, IMO) without getting stupid (or stupid funny), I think it could be a hit with a whole new cult following...

      Can't wait to downlo...er...legally watch the Dalek episode ;)

    7. Re:This could be really good... by Badfysh · · Score: 1

      I'd have to agree with you there, it was pretty dark for a kids show.

      --

      I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

    8. Re:This could be really good... by AussieVamp2 · · Score: 1

      as long as they don't go Battlestar and look like Thatcher!

  8. Space has a terrible secret. by istewart · · Score: 1

    We are here to protect you... from the terrible secret of space.

    Do you have stairs in your house?

    1. Re:Space has a terrible secret. by tehshen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry to break it to you, but the stairs thing doesn't work anymore. They can (apparently) climb stairs in this series as well.

      So, to be safe, I'm sleeping on the roof.

      --
      Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
    2. Re:Space has a terrible secret. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Funny


      Real Daleks don't use stairs, they just level the building.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:Space has a terrible secret. by TylerL82 · · Score: 1

      I'm relieved to know that I am protected.

    4. Re:Space has a terrible secret. by Celt · · Score: 1

      I am protected

      Anyway it should be interesting to see what the new ep is like come Saturday :)

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
  9. Sink plunger?-Deep Sink. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Is it just me or does that sound terrifyingly sexual?"

    Now you know why former IT workers are going into the plumbing business.

  10. lines by ArbitraryConstant · · Score: 1

    ""Roughly a third of the lines in the episode are either spoken by the Dalek or Rose," says Briggs. "It never shuts up!""

    I'm having trouble imagining a Dalek having that much dialogue. They barely know words other than "Exterminate!".

    --
    I rarely criticize things I don't care about.
    1. Re:lines by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm having trouble imagining a Dalek having that much dialogue. They barely know words other than "Exterminate!".

      He commented on the quantity of the Dalek dialogue, not the quality.

      For all we know it could go like this:
      Rose: Hi. So, uh, you're like a robot Dalek
      Dalek: EXTERMINATE!
      Rose: Wot? Why are you being like that?
      Dalek: EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!
      Rose: Um, please stop saying that.
      Dalek: EXTERMINATE! ... etc...

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    2. Re:lines by GWTPict · · Score: 1
      I seem to remember

      It Is The Doctor, Exterminate, Exterminate etc etc.

      So they do have more of a vocabulary than you may think, they're just very single minded.

    3. Re:lines by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      Surely if there's only one Dalek, then there's not much point in it saying "Exterminate" at all?

    4. Re:lines by Feneric · · Score: 1

      Actually in some of the episodes Daleks have pretty long monologues. One observation that I have though is the longer they talk, the more excited and angry sounding they get...

    5. Re:lines by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I'm having trouble imagining a Dalek having that much dialogue. "

      Heh. There was a Red Dwarf vid a while back called from "From A to Z". They went down the alphabet and.. yadda yadda yadda. At some point, they had a pair of Daleks up for an interview. The first said that it didn't watch Earth programs, the second said the red alert bulb gag was funny. Then the first cried that its counterpart had been infected by human propoganda and blew its head off.

      That was the most I ever heard a Dalek speak.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:lines by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 1

      The Dalek Empire Series from Big Finish is fanatastic, better than the TV show by far [I'm still a fan though], and it has lots of Dalek dialogue and phycology.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    7. Re:lines by SimplyCosmic · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's something the later Dalek episodes forced upon them, and adding Davros, who usually did most of the speaking for them in his episodes didn't help.

      In earlier episodes like The Dalek Invasion of Earth, the Daleks are downright chatty.

  11. Re:Thanks for those massive spoilers, Slashdot. by tehshen · · Score: 1

    Well with a title like Dalek, what do you expect to turn up?

    (Although I am more concerned with the twelfth one's title)

    --
    Guy asked me for a quarter for a cup of coffee. So I bit him.
  12. arghhhhhhhhhh by Skiron · · Score: 1, Funny

    ./me hides behind sofa

    1. Re:arghhhhhhhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      oh for goodness' sake, man..

      from reading your post, I assume you are an Englishman, or at least a Briton. We are made of sterner stuff than this - every Dr. Who monster has a fatal weakness:

      Daleks : common salt : easy - UK is an island, with lots (way lots) of rain.. easy to cause trouble with salt.

      Cybermen : Gold : again, easy - move to Switzerland..

  13. Torrent? by stalefries · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone got a torrent of it yet?

    --
    -stalefries
    1. Re:Torrent? by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      The torrents and eMule links usually crop up within 24 hours of the episode airing, which happens at 7pm UK time next Saturday.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    2. Re:Torrent? by StuffJustHappens · · Score: 1

      ..which is good because my DVD recorder keeps locking up and so eMule is working as a great backup PVR!

      --
      --What's this sig thing all about then? Should I have one?
  14. Yes, now that they've fixed all the limitations by Colin+Smith · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Daleks can rule the world....

    Hang on a minute... What if we made all the doors just that bit too narrow for them to get through!!!

    Ha ha! Foiled again!

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Yes, now that they've fixed all the limitations by Grey_14 · · Score: 1

      Nah, All the fat people would bitch, and in the interest of being PC, we would make the door's bigger, Sure the Daleks would exterminate us all, but at least we would all be treated equally!

    2. Re:Yes, now that they've fixed all the limitations by AkaXakA · · Score: 3, Funny

      What if we made all the doors just that bit too narrow for them to get through!!!

      Shhh, that's China's plan to foil the American takeover of earth!*

      *Come on, being able laugh at yourself is a sign of maturity :)

    3. Re:Yes, now that they've fixed all the limitations by malf-uk · · Score: 1

      Well in the UK, it would contravene the Disability Discrimination Act.

      Daleks wasted their time developing and installing their anti-grav devices as ramps should be thoughtfully provided too.

      --
      R Tape loading error, 0:1
  15. Collected by an unsuspecting billionaire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The elusive C M Burns, who wants to form an army of dogs with bees in their mouths, but it turns out the dogs are merely a front for a Dalek invasion of earth.

  16. Return of classic scifi: Land of the Lost by AtariAmarok · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With a Land of the Lost movie in the works, this new Dr Who, and the success of "Battlestar Galactica", it seems that these are good times for the return of classic scifi. Except for "Star Trek", which hardly went away, and managed to wear itself out.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Return of classic scifi: Land of the Lost by Flamsmark · · Score: 1

      doctor who and galactica are different breeds. doctor who is very escapist, a normal person being taken on a wonderful, impossible, creative journey. galactica is very human. it's documentary style, and it lookas at how people act under pressure. and stuff.

      --
      copyright © 2005 Flamsmsmark the ravings of a melancholly i
  17. Dr. Who? by Darvin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hopefully the next episodes will be much more welcoming. The last two episodes had a good story line, however the slapstick of the farting aliens, and hearing the Dr. actually say "fart" several times was more than pathetic, it was cring-making.

    1. Re:Dr. Who? by GWTPict · · Score: 1

      It's a kids program. Every kid I've ever known likes fart jokes.

    2. Re:Dr. Who? by Quirk · · Score: 1

      The fx seem to have been done by someone transfixed by Ghost Busters. I've watched every episode as they come on in Canada and the fx all seem to be a la the swirling gases and bubbling amorphous masses of ectoplasm introduced in Ghost Busters.

      --
      "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
      Cohen
    3. Re:Dr. Who? by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      pfft the last 2 episodes had blue lights man! Thats like.. blue!

      You have a point, it does have that feel but so does most modern Sci fi. The problem is they keep trying to use Earth settings because "It's scarier" when really it's much easier to use human characters then do a full cast of aliens which costs money.

      --
      I like muppets.
    4. Re:Dr. Who? by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 2

      I kind of agree, although I'll cut it some slack 'cos it is a kids programme really!

      Did anyone notice it getting a little bit political with the alien-PM using the threat of Weapons of Mass Destruction against the Earth, and being able to deploy them in 45 seconds**?

      **In the UK, the "intelligence" information that Iraq was able to deploy WMD in 45 minutes was used as a pro-war agruement by the government, but the evidence turned out to be very flimsy. Long story, but the government and the BBC were very much at logger-heads. So someone at the beeb obviously thought this would be fun!

    5. Re:Dr. Who? by 6 · · Score: 1

      My boyfriend nd I nearly fell off the sofa laughing at the weapons of destruction lines.

      The British have given proof of the weapons of destruction to the U.N. :)

    6. Re:Dr. Who? by TheRedGuy · · Score: 1

      Yes! I and the wife noticed and were rather amused by the blatant mocking of the Gov. ;-)

      --
      In Soviet Russia, $daily_meme YOU!
    7. Re:Dr. Who? by cybpunks3 · · Score: 1

      But what producers of "kids" programs don't realize is that the most successful "kids" SF tend to be "adult" SF.

      For instance, Trek reruns in the 70s.

      The second you talk down to kids, you alienate them (think Jar Jar). They don't like it, especially geeky kids who are looking for SF.

  18. Re:Thanks for those massive spoilers, Slashdot. by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reminds me all the times there's "Dalek" in the title but they still tried to build suspense by making the Daleks appearance a surprise at the end of Episode 1.

  19. Scary things, these religions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The main selling point of the Daleks was not that they were scary, but that it was a lot of fun to march down the streek, one arm pointing directly in front of you, and screaming in a high-pitched voice, "EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE! EXTERMINATE!""

    REPENT! REPENT! REPENT! CONVERT! CONVERT! CONVERT!

  20. Old... by EdZ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This was news MONTHS ago, when the issue of 'rights' to the daleks first cropped up, and when it was resolved, also several months ago. And even before the first episode aired (and even before it leaked) we knew that the daleks would first appear in episode 6. How is this news then, if it's not new?

  21. Pffff by FinchWorld · · Score: 1
    Daleks scarey? Only the gay Daleks were. Exsperminate!

    Man I wish I could remember which commedy sketch that was from.

    --
    "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    1. Re:Pffff by simonwalton · · Score: 1

      It was TV Offal.

    2. Re:Pffff by AndyboyH · · Score: 1

      Which was a creation of Victor Lewis Smith iirc

      --
      Baka Drew
  22. I feel I should say something here... by Thedalek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I mean, I just feel involved, you know?

    Anyway, the new Doctor Who series is absolutely gripping, laugh-out-loud funny, and subtly frightening all at the same time. In short, all the things Doctor Who has always been, and should always be.

    My only disappointment is that the new series seems to be heavily reusing plot elements from the Big Finish audio dramas. Episode two, The Unquiet Dead, basically took the setting and overall structure (Victorian ghost story, ghosts are caused by alien influence, seance held to communicate with spirits, heavily rational character who has trouble coping with the new facts before him) from the second Big Finish audio play, Phantasmagoria. Granted, they were both written by the same person, but he even goes so far as to mention it in the TV Episode (Charles Dickens [Upon seeing an alien/ghost]: What phantasmagoria is this?)

    Next week's episode (simply titled "Dalek") seems to be a retooling of the Big Finish play, Jubilee. They're both written by the same gentleman, and both deal with a lone Dalek captured and tortured for the betterment of mankind. The trailer at the end of last week's episode implies that they share other plot elements as well.

    Then again, I'm still puzzling over what all the "Bad Wolf" clues mean. I somewhat suspect that this Doctor's relationship with Rose extends prior to the first episode. Who (and where) is Rose's father? Why is the Doctor so staunchly opposed to Jackie travelling with them, when he was willing to bring Mickey? I also suspect that this Doctor may not be the Doctor. This will probably become more clear when the new novel, Gallifrey Chronicles is released, although the TV Show will probably reveal more plot details before then.

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    1. Re:I feel I should say something here... by GWTPict · · Score: 1

      Willing to bring M(R)icky? When?

    2. Re:I feel I should say something here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Episode #5: World War Three

    3. Re:I feel I should say something here... by gmenhorn · · Score: 1

      The Bad Wolf reference has showed up in Episodes 2, 3, 4, and 5.
      Episode 2: The face saying this is 'bad wolf scenario'.
      Episode 3: Gwyneth seeing a 'big bad wolf!' in Rose's mind
      Episode 4/5: 'Bad wolf' painted on the side of the TARDIS.

    4. Re:I feel I should say something here... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Some reference to Fenric from the last season?

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    5. Re:I feel I should say something here... by Psiren · · Score: 1

      one man's trash is another mans treasure I suppose

      True enough. I've never been a Dr Who fan myself, but given all the hype surrounding this series I thought I'd give it a shot and see what I was missing. Obviously I needn't have bothered, but I guess there's enough people enjoying it to make it worthwhile for them.

    6. Re:I feel I should say something here... by asuffield · · Score: 1

      Why is the Doctor so staunchly opposed to Jackie travelling with them, when he was willing to bring Mickey?

      Because she's an idiot. I wouldn't want her travelling with me either.

      I also suspect that this Doctor may not be the Doctor.

      Every Doctor is unique. All they really share is memory. Regeneration is more than a physical change.

  23. Hands off! by David+Horn · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd just like to say to any non-British resident that I expressly forbid you to download the new series.

    My license fee paid for the Dalek (or at least the sink plunger), and I don't see why anyone other than me should enjoy it. After all, I'm always being told that it's "my BBC."

    Anyone interested in an exclusive DVD can get in touch using the usual methods, supplying delivery address and credit card number. Doesn't have to be your card, I'm not picky.

    --
    PocketGamer.org - For the gamer on the go!
    1. Re:Hands off! by whiteranger99x · · Score: 1

      Placing an order here:

      CC Number: 772985 12331568 01

      Address: Please send it to the dumpster behind the chinese restaurant, the one next to the video store, not the one next to a pharmacy.

      K thnx, bye

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    2. Re:Hands off! by 3vi1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's "your BBC". We have "BBC America". Unfortunately, their programming consists of 23 different home-redecorating shows and Benny Hill reruns.

    3. Re:Hands off! by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      What about a person who *IS* British yet is not living in the UK? - Like, say... Me?

      I know you reference non-resident... But I am downloading my quota of BBC just the same. ;)

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    4. Re:Hands off! by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

      The current episodes are £10.99 from Amazon IIRC.

    5. Re:Hands off! by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I'm in a commonwealth nation too. And I agree the british should insist that other tv stations in other countries show the new show!!!!!

  24. Obligatory by JumperCable · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well I don't know about you, but I for one welcome our new... aaah crap, that one actually makes sense.

  25. Just seen the advert for this episode on the telly by j.a.mcguire · · Score: 1

    Really, they could have updated the design to be a little more "now" It looks like the original crappy dalek, it's laughable why anyone would be convinced by an up-turned dustbin with wheels and a plunger is beyond me.

  26. Re:Who? What? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "THIS is news?!! Sweet Jesus on a motorbike!...you might as will run a Google story or a "bring back Enterprise" story."

    I submitted two now-rejected stories on yesterday's "Land of the Lost" revival. If minor details about Dr Who make it, why not this one? Hope somebody gets this as a news item (I don't really care that it won't be me).

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  27. You've got to remember it's a kids sci-fi show by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    It is to scare young children into hiding behind the sofa. I suspect we're all just that little bit too old for it. Having said that my nearly OAP parents schedule their dinner times round it.

    Think horror for 5-10 year olds.

    --
    Deleted
  28. I have nothing to contribute to this conversation by mrshowtime · · Score: 1

    except....EXTERMINATE!!

    --
    "Jeremy, you need to get to an internet cafe and cut and paste some appropriate sentiments about me from the world wide
  29. sign of weakness by fermion · · Score: 1
    Daleks were trotted out when ratings needed a boost. By putting on a dalek episode this early, the BBC has a made a vote of no confidence wrt the show. I would have really hoped that we would have one season of dalek free original scripts.

    There were a lot dalek episodes in the first 10 or so seasons, which was fine because it was new and they allowed much development. Then they reduced the frequency in the height of the Tom Baker years, and then were made occasionally to support the weaker seasons, especially after Davidson.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:sign of weakness by Thedalek · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except that the episode was written and filmed last year, back when the series was shot. This is not a case of "Oh, the ratings are slipping a bit. Let's put in a Dalek episode." This is a case of the fans saying, "It's not proper _Who_ unless we have classic _Who_ villians, like the Daleks, the Autons, the Cybermen..."

      The BBC is heavily banking on the new Doctor Who, and it's no wonder, considering that the first episode was the highest rated show in its timeslot, and third highest rated in the week. They've already gone and commissioned a second series, a Christmas special, a line of toys, novels, and heaven knows what else. They advertise the show non-stop, set up tie-in websites here and here, and even show a documentary series which ties in to the most recent episode of the show.

      Point is, they've spent a whole heck of a lot of money on the show, and they plan on spending a lot more. If this is a vote of no-confidence, I wish more sci-fi series would get such treatment.

      --
      Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    2. Re:sign of weakness by md04 · · Score: 1

      You have to remember that these shows were filmed months ago and not filmed week by week. So it isn't a case of "Oh no! Crap ratings, quick knock out a Dalek episode" and film it within the week.

    3. Re:sign of weakness by wk633 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The true sign of ratings weakness will be Rose losing clothing.

    4. Re:sign of weakness by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      it's no wonder, considering that the first episode was the highest rated show in its timeslot, and third highest rated in the week.

      I'm fed up of hearing what the ratings for the first episode were. Lots of shows (which have had lots of hype) get large ratings for the first episode, which often drop quite alarmingly as time goes on. Not that I'm suggesting that this is the case, but let's look at the figures for episode 3 onwards as a more accurate barometer.

      They advertise the show non-stop, set up tie-in websites here and here, and even show a documentary series which ties in to the most recent episode of the show.

      Anyone notice the not-entirely-subtle plugging of the BBC's other services, such as "BBC News 24", and even when Billie.. er, Rose mentioned something she'd seen on "Newsround Extra". I mean, Newsround is intended for *children* dammit!

      You're meant to be 19, not 9...

      That having been said, I had a flatmate of similar age who got more news from watching "Newsround" than anything else. And it bloody showed, too.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:sign of weakness by eddy · · Score: 1

      Can't wait!

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    6. Re:sign of weakness by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      I watched Newsround will into my 20's.

      When the major news is all about wars and elections, it's much better viewing.

    7. Re:sign of weakness by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      Anyone notice the not-entirely-subtle plugging of the BBC's other services, such as "BBC News 24", and even when Billie.. er, Rose mentioned something she'd seen on "Newsround Extra". I mean, Newsround is intended for *children* dammit!

      I liked that. Rose, at the beginning, is The Chav From Hell. She's so clueless that her knowledge of current affairs comes from Newsround Extra, which is as you say a childrens' show and spectacularly dumbed down. I remember there was always a running joke at school about how there were always at least two articles about dolphins in any Newsround...

      Travelling with the Doctor for a while will hopefully broaden her hitherto unused mind. She's already showing some political awareness - 'Why not? It worked last time', she says, about the distinctly dubious pretext given by the faux-PM for the nuclear strike. By the end of the series, she'll be a long way from the loathsome little Newsround Extra viewer she once was.

      As for plugging News 24... well, why the hell shouldn't they? It's not even unrealistic; when a UFO crashes into Big Ben, BBC1 will definitely cancel all programming and switch to News 24, and that's where most people will see it. And anyway, we see enough movies and shows from the US where the President watches events on Sky News...

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:sign of weakness by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I just hope it gets shown on maltese or italian tv too or any fta station on satellite or even BBC PRIME (which has said it will not be showing any DR WHO) hopefully.. though I will be getting the DVD box sets.

    9. Re:sign of weakness by JeremyGL · · Score: 1

      That puts me in mind of Nicola Bryant and Peter Davidson's complaint that everybody missed his perfect acting during his regeneration scene because she was leaning over him in a low cut top ! :-)

    10. Re:sign of weakness by wk633 · · Score: 1

      I just remember 'Nissa' (sp?) - late in the Tom Baker era, same time as Adric. She didn't follow the usual female companion clothing trend, so in her last episode, she bascially undressed through the entire thing.

  30. Re:What I wonder is...the English Class System by Quirk · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's the horror of being below the salt. At dinner there were two sorts. Those above the salt were entitled to sprinkle salt on their fare, but the unlucky, below the salt, were denied salt and were deemed to be below the salt. Granted they probably didn't use salt shakers when this quaint custom was in play.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  31. Not convinced so far by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    I have to say, the dialog on last weeks show was beyond cringe-making. I think they can act, but the lines they've been given are just cruel. I can handle the dodgy special effects and the really crappy looking 'organic' tardis (why is it that in every fucking scifi series you here the artists say something like "we were going for a more organic looking ship" its really out of fashion now) but they need some better writing.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  32. See the Trailer for yourself by gnugnugnu · · Score: 3, Informative

    The trailer for Doctor Who Episode: Dalek
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/video/index.shtml

    It is in Real Video format.

    Maybe a good slashdottting will encourage the BBC to put up bitorrent links for its trailers?

    1. Re:See the Trailer for yourself by onebuttonmouse · · Score: 4, Funny

      You're going to slashdot this?

      --
      MacBook Pro. Worst name since the Bicycle
  33. What's wrong with that? by lheal · · Score: 1
    (Victorian ghost story, ghosts are caused by alien influence, seance held to communicate with spirits, heavily rational character who has trouble coping with the new facts before him)

    That's typical Dr. Who stuff. I'd be disappointed if it didn't have that kind of thing.

    On the other hand, for the non-Who-fan, imagine if the original Star Trek series had just kept going on, and on, with a new cast starring in the same roles. Sort of like 60 minutes, but more realistic :-).

    Now, where'd I put my sonic screwdriver? I need to brew some tea.

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  34. Re:Thanks for those massive spoilers, Slashdot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    So I suppose you switched off, the very second last night's episode ended, so as not to see next week's preview?

    No, but from everything I saw in the preview it COULD have been a cyberman wearing a dalek costume for a fancy dress party or Dr Who convention.

  35. The previews.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    The preview made it look rather lame in all honesty. It seems to be in a giant muesum which looks very similar to a bunker complex. Theres loads of soldiers shooting at it in one scene and the bullets just vanish midair. It zaps a few people and then turns and zaps some more.. it really does look rather tame now.

    The flying wasn't that impressive either, it just sorts of floats upwards, nothing THAT impressive.

    I mean we live in an era where you can fire 10 shots a second if not more yet we're afraid of something which fires about 1 shot every 10 seconds?

    Plus the doctor has his magic screw driver, he can screw it over with that alone.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:The previews.. by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      what a complaints.

      well. in a time where you can't be sure star trek series run the full 7 seasons, doctor Who is really cool.

      By now we know 'the enemy' also knows how to lay a bomb and hoe to fight back dirty, so that hollywood myth is busted too, but still bad guys in the movies don't know how to aim and the good guys still kill a whole army with 100 bullets.

      just enjoy the doctor or watch something else :)

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    2. Re:The previews.. by Funksaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're forgetting something important.

      The Dalek is a f*cking tank.

      Who cares if he can fire once every 10 seconds. I would imagine a Bradley tank can't fire more often than that.

      Now, imagine this. An American tank, made with DU armor, up against a WWII era tank - the DU ammunition would tear through the WWII era tank like tinfoil, while the WWII era tank wouldn't be able to do more than scratch the surface of the modern tank.

      Okay, now replace Depleted Uranium shells with a DEATH RAY, and replace DU armor with Dalekanium. Put it into a package that has hover capabilities, 360 degree view, 0" turning radius, and put a mad monster with a nazi-like fascination for genocide of the whole human race behind the wheel.

      The only hope of defeating it is a device which requires you to get relatively close to it. It is paranoid and will destroy everything that gets in it's way. The only person that knows how to use the device is a person that the Dalek vows to kill on sight...

      Salt shaker, my ass. Those things are scary as hell...

  36. Re:Thanks for those massive spoilers, Slashdot. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 3, Funny

    The new series isn't like that saddly. It's damn obvious from the get go whats happening and just needs Rose to discover it basicly.

    The last 2 weeks episodes were quite frankly dire and maybe thats why the Dalek one is next.Go from "look farting fat bastards" to "look shiny like a spoon!"

    --
    I like muppets.
  37. Re:Who? What? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
    "I've got a different story still pending from friday afternoon!"

    I suggest you do as the Republicans do: ban the slashdot fillibuster. I've got no complaint: I had swift rejection of my "nominees".

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  38. Bad Wolf... by Thedalek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    [i]Which clues would these be? Some kid wrote his nickname in graffiti on the side of the Tardis... later the doctor caught him and made him paint it blue again. This is a clue to something? Somehow I doubt it.[/i]

    Episode 1 (hearsay) - The Nestine Conciousness mouths the words "bad wolf" when speaking with the Doctor.

    Episode 2 - The Moxx of Balhoon mentions a "Big bad wolf scenario" to the Face of Boe.

    Episode 3 - Quinneth mentions the "Big bad wolf" and pulls away from Rose, terrified.

    Episode 4 - "Bad Wolf" spray painted on the TARDIS.

    Episode 5 - Indirect reference. Who Is Doctor Who?, the tie-in website, mentions "big bad wolf" when referencing the closing minutes of the episode.

    There is also an upcoming episode titled "Bad Wolf."

    Where is the ambiguity?

    The writers have already implictly and explicitly stated that there is a dark mystery regarding Rose and the Doctor, and their relationship.

    What? You are crazy... he is the best Doctor since Tom Baker.

    He's the first Doctor to brutally kill a villian. His behavior is sometimes darker than Colin Baker's darkest moments. We still don't know all the events surrounding the Time War, and we have no regeneration sequence to show that this Doctor came from McGann's incarnation. It has even been explicitly stated that there will be no such sequence.

    Plus, from a practical standpoint, he's eating up incarnations like candy. Going on to the 10th out of 13 after just one series seems a bit quick, but allowing the current Doctor to be a phoney gives the writers an extra incarnation to play with.

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    1. Re:Bad Wolf... by mark-t · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Allowing the Doctor to somehow resolve the time war and bring back Gallifrey and all Timelords also resolves his incarnation issues.

      Remember, the Timelords *were* willing to grant a whole new life cycle to the Master in exchange for his cooperation in "The Five Doctors". I think the Doctor somehow bringing the Timelords back from non-existence would be a service worthy of similar reward.

      And they don't even have to break continuity to pull it off, since the precedent is already there.

    2. Re:Bad Wolf... by Feneric · · Score: 1
      Plus, from a practical standpoint, he's eating up incarnations like candy. Going on to the 10th out of 13 after just one series seems a bit quick, but allowing the current Doctor to be a phoney gives the writers an extra incarnation to play with.

      He's also gotten younger. I recall the sixth Doctor mentioning that he was already 900 years old in one of his first season episodes, and the seventh Doctor mentioned (AFAICR) that he had been messing around with alien technology for over 900 years implying that he'd already been off Gallifrey for at least that long, and yet in the new series he's back to 900.

    3. Re:Bad Wolf... by DarkZero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Episode 3 - Quinneth mentions the "Big bad wolf" and pulls away from Rose, terrified.

      I'm pretty positive that the Gelth just randomly says the words "Bad Wolf" while crying out during the seance. I didn't even notice the whole "Bad Wolf" thing until I heard that and then noticed the kid painting "Bad Wolf" on the TARDIS in the preview for episode 4.

      I wouldn't be surprised if the Nestine Consciousness in the first episode also said it, because it seems like most people didn't catch the Gelth saying it.

    4. Re:Bad Wolf... by Lavaeolus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Plus, the BBC registered badwolf.org.uk last November.

      Coincidence?

    5. Re:Bad Wolf... by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I hope he gets retrogenerated back into his fifth regeneration and we can get Peter Davison back, only somewhat older, of course! I can hope, can't I?

    6. Re:Bad Wolf... by VdG · · Score: 1

      I know plenty of people who seem to be stuck on 29; The Doctor's just scared of the big 1000.

    7. Re:Bad Wolf... by malf-uk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Add another indirect reference on Episode 5. On one of the news clips on the site - the american news presenter is named as Mal Loup

      --
      R Tape loading error, 0:1
  39. Re:Thanks for those massive spoilers, Slashdot. by Dougy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can't stand the american-esque way of revealing half of the ENTIRE plot of the next episode at the end of each one! At least we don't have commercial breaks, so theres no 5 minute segment telling you EVERYTHING thats going to happen after the commercial! (okay, I know most programs arent really like that over there, but the reality ones are full of it, and it is just dire).

  40. Re:I hope I'm not alone.. by Quirk · · Score: 1

    I took a quick sample, and, it appears that, uhmm, yes, you're alone in asking. Give it some thought.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  41. May 10th on CBC for those of us in Canada. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
    'Dalek' is on BBC-1 on Saturday, 30 April."

    Or, for those of us in Canada, it will be on the CBC main network on Tuesday, May 10th.

    So far, I've been good: because the BBC broadcasts the episodes ten days before we see them here in Canada, I could download and watch them rather than wait the ten days -- but other than the initial leaked episode ("Rose"), I've waited for the local broadcasts on CBC.

    I just hope they decide to release the DVD boxed set here in Canada as well.

    And what's up with Planet of the Doctor anyhow? The CBC site still claims that it will start "in early April". Well guess what guys -- early April has come and long gone.

    Yaz.

    1. Re:May 10th on CBC for those of us in Canada. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      If they do release it in Canada, that'll give all of us US-based Who fans a *much* better option for buying DVDs, rather than importing R2 releases from the UK. Damn, I wish someone would hurry up and sell us this damn thing, so I can stop stealing it.

    2. Re:May 10th on CBC for those of us in Canada. by Yaztromo · · Score: 1
      If they do release it in Canada, that'll give all of us US-based Who fans a *much* better option for buying DVDs, rather than importing R2 releases from the UK. Damn, I wish someone would hurry up and sell us this damn thing, so I can stop stealing it.

      I know this is complete and utter blasphemy in the US -- but why not call up your cable or satellite company and ask that they carry the CBC?

      Okay, they'll probably blow you off, but nothing ever happens when you don't try :).

      Yaz.

    3. Re:May 10th on CBC for those of us in Canada. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 1

      Good point, but that still won't get us a DVD release. Oh well, US-based Who fandom is used to being left in the lurch.

  42. Its not sci-fi.. by Bazman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its political satire.

    Last night's episode had aliens disguised as politicians trying to start a phoney war by claiming alien forces had "massive weapons of destruction" that could be unleashed in "45 seconds".

    And the reason for the war? They wanted the earth for fuel. Mmm. Sounds familiar...

    Now that the BBC cant be overtly political, what with the coming election, its sneaking its politics covertly into "kids" programmes :)

    Baz

    1. Re:Its not sci-fi.. by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      It was quite funny... remember it was filmed long before the election date was known.

      The 45 second line and the subsequent 'he's making it all up!' had us rolling about on the floor laughing...

      The overweight deputy prime minister definately reminded me of someone too...

    2. Re:Its not sci-fi.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That story was riddled with political allusions. Consider the central idea of the show: an aircraft hitting a major structure in a city; stage-managed by aliens to provide a photo-oppurtunity that will allow those aliens, masquarading as politicians, to further their agenda by scaring the bejezzus out of the rest of the world.

      The reason the aliens crashed the spaceship was so that they could convince the world that there was (as you said) a threat from alien "weapons of mass destruction" that could be released in "45 seconds". The goal being that the Earth uses it's own military power to destroy itself, leaving the irradiated debris of the Earth available for sale as fuel, to the highest bidder.

      Not exactly the material from a "kids programme".

      I'll leave the real world parallels to the imagination of the reader. Needless to say, to anyone who's been paying attention for the last four years or so the allusions are obvious.

      -- G.S. (posting anonymously because this post will be moderated down by Republicans.)

    3. Re:Its not sci-fi.. by Mant · · Score: 1

      You say that is if the two are mutually contradictory. Sci-fi stories (as oppssed to space fantasy and action with sci-fi effects) often make commentary on modern day events or attitudes. Nothing stops it being sci-fi and political satire at the same time.

  43. Re:Thanks for those massive spoilers, Slashdot. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    It's to "get you to watch next week".. it's common pretty much every where including the UK now. Personally I'd rather they just showed the episode title and left it at that.

    Then again watch any TV show here and Billie Piper will pop up sooner or later and spoil the next episode for you.

    --
    I like muppets.
  44. One of the greatest SciFi series by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With the possible exception of Sliders (which was still low rent compared to any season of Doctor Who), the Doctor Who series is one of the greatest science fiction series ever produced. They got it right from day one: the story comes first. Screw the special effects, the "ass kicking" or the quality of the acting and focus on what matters, a good story line. As a hero, the Doctor definitely has always been brains first and physical action as a last resort. It's not a wonder that this series is really good for children as well as adults. It's got a decent message.

    I've been keeping up with Doctor Who 2005 via P2P since it probably will never air in the states. I have to say that Eccleston plays a really good turn at the Doctor. He definitely doesnt' try to imitate anyone else that came before him. Billie Piper isn't as annoying as I had feared either. I was worried that she'd just be cheesecake like Nicola Bryant. But she seems to play a decent companion that thinks for herself. They also did a really good job of making the new theme song. They still have a lot of the original Delia Derbyshire rendition (1st-4th Doctor) mixed in with the new stuff. Prodution values are much higher, probably owing to better technology than what was available even in the late 80s with Sylvester McCoy.

    What I am surprised about is that I really haven't heard other people's opinions about the new series. I expected to hear lots of people either raving about it or potting it. But I've heard nothing. Hasn't anyone else on /. in the USA been doing the P2P thing to get hold of those shows? One more thing to mention... Apparently, the BBC is going to be releasing a DVD box set of this season in the fall. It will only be for Europe and the UK, so get out those region free DVD players or try out Xine if you're lucky enough to have a DVD drive that is reagion free. They will also be releasing the individual programs starting after the airing of this season's last episode.

    If you can find it... enjoy. :)

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:One of the greatest SciFi series by AkaXakA · · Score: 1

      Well, that's mainly because the dialog, lighting and staging is just too horrible for words. Proper BBC shows (and earlier Dr. Who series) were a lot better than this. _that's_ why there's no real hype about it.

    2. Re:One of the greatest SciFi series by ctid · · Score: 1
      CAUTION: This post contains a very mild spoiler, but the link herein contains a huge spoiler. Don't follow the link unless you've seen all the episodes!


      I agree. I think it's wonderful, in the main. Have you seen the website that goes with the series? [SPOILER WARNING] Do not follow the link unless you have seen all the episodes so far!!! Who is Doctor Who website [SPOILER WARNING] This website was alluded to in the first episode, but you really should not go to the website if you've not seen the episodes. Interestingly, it looks like there is a .com (as opposed to .co.uk) version of the URL which doesn't have any content yet. Hopefully the producers are keeping this one for when the series is shown in America. It really is a clever idea and one which shows how much thought has been put into this series.

      --
      Reality is defined by the maddest person in the room
    3. Re:One of the greatest SciFi series by BlightThePower · · Score: 1

      I've enjoyed it very much.

      Perhaps what may not go down to well with the Slashdotesque approach to sci-fi is that Dr Who is both a national instituion in the UK and (most importantly to the producers of the present series) a children's programme that adults can enjoy. They've done superbly well in the latter category particularly, the last two episodes having in interesting and satirical plotline that adults can wink at eachother about but also featuring lots of scary aliens, explosions, running about and the longest sustained farting joke I've ever seen, for the kids. Best of all its quite scary in places but scary in a wholesome way. Its traditional to grow up terrified of Dr Who villains (I was, my parents were) and I'm glad to say its been retained in these days of worrying overly "about the children" and the tendency towards 'gross out' horror.

      Its hard to put this clearly, but the point of reference for Dr Who isn't Battlestar Galactica or Startrek or Farscape or D&D or whatever. It isn't written by a sci-fi writer (as such), its written by a popular dramatist who writes for TV. Its 40-odd years of Dr Who itself. It more a British thing, more a kid's thing than it is Geek-ghetto thing possibly.

      --
      Plays violent online games as: Nerfherder76
  45. Re:Just seen the advert for this episode on the te by youngerpants · · Score: 1

    becasue... it's... a... dalek. Would you rather it looked like an iPod?

  46. Stairs? by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Stairs have not been a problem for Daleks since 1988,"

    I've heard it said that real Daleks don't climb stairs, they level the building.

    1. Re:Stairs? by meringuoid · · Score: 1

      That is so siggable. Ta!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  47. Re:Once again Doctor Who jumps the shark! by Drantin · · Score: 1
    "maybe Daleks run Linux now as their core OS"
    Except that Daleks have mutated Kaleds in them rather than computers...
    --
    Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
  48. Re:He's not alone. by Quirk · · Score: 1

    Wait for a mod. They'll let you know.

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  49. Re:45 second alian WMD!! by rewinn · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, to be fair, "Dr. Who" is a work of fiction. This is to be distinguished from .. oh, wait, I see your point ...

  50. Get your Who on: (Bittorrents) by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't even own a TV - however, I do like the 2005 Dr. Who series. For those of you who do not own a TV line myself, or get a channel that has Dr. Who on it:

    Dr. Who (2005) Bittorrents.

    The first torrent (at the bottom) is just a preview, the rest are the current episodes.

    --
    Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  51. Gitmo'd dalek by BlightThePower · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...well I reckon from the trailer and the fact that the last two episodes were thinly veiled 9/11/Bush allegory (destruction of national landmark by flying craft, blamed on pigs(?), weapons of mass destruction, the UN, fat-people-as-villains (ahem) and something about fuel).

    We'll know for sure when they start threatening it with dogs and taking polaroids I guess.

    --
    Plays violent online games as: Nerfherder76
    1. Re:Gitmo'd dalek by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Remember it's british political satire not US political satire... the humour was all about the british government... the fat deputy PM bore more than a passing resemblance to John Prescott, for example. Quite a bit of taking the p...s out of Andrew Marr too (who was clearly up for it).

      The landmark destruction didn't come across as a 9/11 thing.. very early on it was deemed to be accidental, and little or no mention of it was given in the subsequent dialog... I think it was just a dramatic special effect to start the story.

    2. Re:Gitmo'd dalek by BlightThePower · · Score: 1

      The landmark destruction thing I only wondered about because the Doctor draws attention to it at one point as being a bit unlikely to have been accidental (and it wasn't, the 'accident' was deliberate as it turned out). Also its not really imagery to accidentlly invoke, I would have thought someone at the BBC would have called it if it wasn't intentional. I didn't really get the TwoJags thing myself to honest, but fair enough.

      As to the Dalek, well it does appear to be held by Americans. And Davies has said already that he hoped we'd feel pity for Dalek on one level. I'm wondering if its going to be a 'inhuman (ahem) treatment of our evil enemies is still wrong' kind of thing.

      --
      Plays violent online games as: Nerfherder76
  52. Re:Just seen the advert for this episode on the te by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

    . . . besides, in the future, Ipods look like Wurlizter jukeboxes. And play Earth's finest classical music, like "Tainted Love" by Soft Cell . . .

  53. Confused by JohnG307 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who has no idea what a "Dalek" is? I've been watching the new series, but the original is just a bit before my time, so the reference is lost.

    1. Re:Confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I the only one who has no idea what a "Dalek" is?

      No. There's also a guy in Mongolia who hasn't heard of them. Unless you're him.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalek

    2. Re:Confused by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Yes.

  54. Who turned off the lights? by stuntpope · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its trademark 'sink plunger' attachment also reveals a terrifying new function

    It has a hat-removal function?

  55. Er... not really news though. by biglig2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Am I the only person who watched Doctor Who on the telly yesterday and saw the trail for next week's episode, which had a Dalek in it?

    Am I also the only person to deduce that the Daleks might be back from the fact that the 6th episode is called "Dalek"? (The names of all the episodes except the twelth have been known for quite some time.)

    Was I the only person who read in various news articles that the BBC had sucessfully concluded negotiations with Terry Nation's estate to allow them to use the Daleks?

    --
    ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  56. Clip of the Dalek in action by WorselWorsel · · Score: 3, Informative
  57. Re:Once again Doctor Who jumps the shark! by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    He didn't quit after one episode. He had a contract for a single series, and decided not to renew it. The first series had already been filmed in its entireity by the time that happened.

  58. Re:Just seen the advert for this episode on the te by Badfysh · · Score: 1
    *POSSIBLE SPOILERS*

    Take this with a pinch of salt because I can't find the original source but I was reading a while back that this old Dalek (that has been on Earth for years) somehow gets free and is able to send a message and call for help, so at the beginning of series 2 we see the new Super Daleks and their invasion fleet...

    --

    I was conned by an old man in a cloak. It turns out those *were* the droids I was looking for.

  59. Cool, just as long as.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... The Daleks don't turn out to be hot chicks.. ;)

  60. Lighten up, for God's sake by ishmalius · · Score: 1

    It's just a good-natured joke. I thought the word play was cute, and not really that political. Fat green dyspeptic aliens (possibly adult Teletubbies) saying that with a Cockney banter is not exactly something to be taken seriously.

    You're going to give yourself an apoplexy like that. ^^

  61. Re:Once again Doctor Who jumps the shark! by Artifakt · · Score: 1

    If you can run Linux on a 286, you can run it on a mutant Kaled, I always say. It's probably easier to run it on a live mutant than a dead badger.

    --
    Who is John Cabal?
  62. Return of the Nightmares by FrankTheCrazy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One of the few recurring nightmares that I had as a child was of those friggin' Daleks.

    They were scary as hell just being a trashcan that awkwardly bumped around and screamed "EXTERMINATE" at everything... BUT NOW, with their "upgrades" they are scary as hell x 100 which = nightmares x 100 for me.

    Thanks BBC for bring back my nightmares!

  63. Good times.. by incabulos · · Score: 1

    I found the cybermen more scary than the daleks, what with their elite stair-climbing skills, and how they could kill people and then re-animate them with nasty control-helmet things on as proto-cybermen.

    The daleks did have a spot in Paradroid on the C64 though, one of the better games of the era, and faithfully reproduced in Freedroid

  64. It Gives Blow Jobs Now? by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1


    "Its trademark 'sink plunger' attachment also reveals a terrifying new function."

    Look out, Angelina Jolie - somebody with more lips than you!

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  65. Its British Humor then. by cqnn · · Score: 1

    Its funny if you're the type that finds
    humor in that sort of thing.

  66. I'm guessing by Aexia · · Score: 1

    We'll see the *actual* updated designs later this season. The ones that finally managed to take down Gallifrey.

  67. Showing in America by still-a-geek · · Score: 1

    When can we Americans start viewing this? I've been a huge Dr. Who fan since I was a little kid. I first saw Dr. Who in the early 80's on PBS in Chicago. Are there any UK people nice enough to recommend a way to view these new episodes without resorting to buy expensive international subscription channels? Thanks and much appreciated!

    Vince

    --

    "Happily lived Mankind in the peaceful Valley of Ignorance." -- Hendrik Willem Van Loon
    1. Re:Showing in America by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      When can we Americans start viewing this? I've been a huge Dr. Who fan since I was a little kid. I first saw Dr. Who in the early 80's on PBS in Chicago. Are there any UK people nice enough to recommend a way to view these new episodes without resorting to buy expensive international subscription channels? Thanks and much appreciated!

      I don't know what you mean by expensive international subscription channels. If you're talking BBC-America it might be on digital cable or might be in the regular expanded basic lineup. I get it Doctor Who in America over cable via CBUT, a CBC affiliate In a handful of cities carry CBC as a basic cable channel.

      If you really want to, you can request CBC from your cable operator. If you like watching the Olympics then this is a must have.
      Contact your local PBS station and ask them to license it. Toss them a couple of bucks if you like.
      Wait for the DVDs and buy them... region free player that does PAL might be helpful, these are not uncommon.
      Ask the BBC for streaming video or downloads
      Screw the BBC and download your self

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  68. OTS klingons by nounderscores · · Score: 1

    Look back at "trouble with tribbles" the klingons are basically mongoloid makeup applied to give a bunch of guys fu man chu beards... kinda timely with politics of the day. The klingon got more russian as the 80s movies came to pass, and also got their own language (which i believe has taken off in a really big way).

    Michael Dorn's forehead is the final evolution of trek makeup. Much like the difference between the season 1 red dwarf cardboard sets and the final season sets with all their elaborate "lived in" detail.

    On the other hand, shows like "buffy the vampire slayer" and "dark angel" had remarkably consistent, convincing and affordable special effects from start to finish. Probably because Joss and James insisted on starting and ending well.

    1. Re:OTS klingons by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 2, Funny

      On the other hand, shows like "buffy the vampire slayer" and "dark angel" had remarkably consistent, convincing and affordable special effects from start to finish.

      Actually, Buffy gave vampires forehead wrinkles remarkably similar to those on a Klingon, which had no relationship to pre-existing vampire mythology. So I didn't find them convincing at all- give me the pale, haughty beauties of Bram Stoker and Anne Rice any day.

      (Additionally, that program also made vampires distintegrate when stabbed through the chest, a plot and prop convenience that also is different from vampire legends, but similar to what happened to Klingons when Kirk zapped his phaser at them)

    2. Re:OTS klingons by nounderscores · · Score: 1

      Good points.

      Doom 3 zombies disintegrate save resources in much the same way.

      One good thing about the Anne Rice books is that they went to movies and stayed in movies, and never had to deal with a TV budget.

    3. Re:OTS klingons by Golias · · Score: 1

      The reason for the forehead transformation on Buffy was to make vampires more rodent-like.

      The main rival in season one was a elder vampire who had a face very much like a rat or a bat (since, as an older vampire, he more closely resembled the demons from which they spawned. The mythology of the Buffy series includes a Lovecraftian concept of demons pre-dating humans on Earth, and Vampires are a lesser half-breed form of those elder demons.) Other vampires on the show were younger and tended to look more human, as they are "less pure" than The Master was.

      Funny that Buffy should come up. One of the Buffy/Angel writers (David Fury) was consulted by the BBC when they were trying to pin down the format of the new Doctor Who show.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:OTS klingons by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      The reason for the forehead transformation on Buffy was to make vampires more rodent-like.

      If you say so, although rodents don't actually have lumpy foreheads. I can think of many simpler features to suggest rat similarity, such as, a pointy nose, enlarged incisors, or just GIANT WHISKERS.

      (Vampires are usually depicted with enlarged canines like a wolf, instead of big incisors like a rodent)

      The mythology of the Buffy series includes a Lovecraftian concept of demons pre-dating humans on Earth,

      That's not Lovecraftian. That's a Christan concept- check Isaiah, or Genesis- noticing that the Serpent was already there before Adam & Eve. Also, Lovecraft never wrote a story involving a demon on Earth.

      Other vampires on the show were younger and tended to look more human, as they are "less pure" than The Master was.

      I didn't pay much attention, but in the episode where she tried (and failed) to destroy Dracula it was implied he was unusually old, but he didn't look any more deformed than the new vampires she demolishes at the rate of 3-5 per episode.

  69. Sink plunger by Orlando · · Score: 1

    Its trademark 'sink plunger' attachment also reveals a terrifying new function.

    It now does toilets as well?

    --
    -= This is a self-referential sig =-
  70. Re:Thanks for those massive spoilers, Slashdot. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the episode guides, which have listed episode 6 as being Dalek since before the first episode ever aired!

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  71. Re:Who? What? by Kanon · · Score: 1

    New Land of the Lost? Excellent. Got a url?

  72. Big Scoop? by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

    The Dalek was in the bloody preview at the end of this week's episode! Hardly a big scoop, is it?

  73. Yes by beforewisdom · · Score: 1

    Yes, but do they still look like trash cans?

    I guess that can be an advantage...camaflouge

    They can sneak up on you, and then pounce on you when you try to stuff your drink up down their heads.

  74. The Green Death by Macka · · Score: 1


    Oh yeah, I remember those as a kid too. Scared the hell out of me as well. If I remember right it was the only Dr Who story line that they either didn't repeat, or they cut it short because of the number of complaints they received from parents. It was giving the kids nightmares.

    Of all the Dr Who monsters, the Green Death maggots were the scariest. Though those large spiders that attached themselves to your back and took over your mind were a close second.

  75. Re:BSG is crap by Macka · · Score: 1


    Thankfully your views are in the minority. I loved it (so did everyone I know) and can't wait for the next series to air.

  76. I'll be scared when... by triffidsting · · Score: 1

    they feature the dalek machine in an episode of "Pimp my ride" and add the undercarriage neons and big bass boosters.

    --
    Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
  77. Sempfer Fidelis by jahknow · · Score: 1
    "To promote a team enviroment, you will all dress the same so there is no individuality. Remember all of Boot Camp is a team effort." http://www.grunt.com/forum/topic.asp?TOPIC_ID=4408 7&#444697

    "When sailors get tattoos, they do it to express their individuality, and their choices range from Betty Boop and Mickey Mouse to raging sea serpents. When Marines get tattoos, they do it to express their solidarity, and choose bull dogs, 'death before dishonor,' and 'USMC.'" http://leathernecklane.com/marine/text/reasons.htm

    --
    ^^
  78. Dalekanium Powerbook G5 by jahknow · · Score: 1

    Death ray, cool. But will it have Bluetooth?

    --
    ^^
  79. Re:Thanks for those massive spoilers, Slashdot. by Golias · · Score: 1

    Shocked? That there's Daleks in Dr Who?

    It's somewhat of a surprise because Daleks are not the intelectual property of the BBC.

    Every time they do a Dalek episode, they have to cut a check to the writer who came up with them.

    Also, they are kind of lame as villians go. Kind of like Star Trek's "Borg"... if all the Borg were wheelchair-bound and instead of a collective mind they communicated mainly by shouting at each other.

    What makes the Daleks popular is the general creepiness of them. They look a little like tanks and behave a little like zombies. A good director can easilly create a rather suspenseful episode of TV around zombie tanks.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  80. Re:Who? What? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Go to news.google.com, and search on "land of the lost". You will find several stories.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  81. possible spoiler by jimbofin · · Score: 1

    Like the Tardis being the Bad Wolf, for instance?

    Zagreus is about the Dr's darkside and is based on a Gallifrean fairytale story, and the sentinet Tardis takes on several personas because it is jealous of the Dr's relationship with a companion (and he hasn't been as close to any companion as much as Rose)It would make more sense for a mainstream TV series to refer to a well known fairytale rather than a fictional one.

    Perhaps Rose should have been killed by the Autons in the normal timeline, if the Dr hadn't intervened?

    Were the Gelphs the people who had their existence wiped from history because of the Dr's intervention?

    The graffiti was written on Tardis ( do you know that in early episodes it was referred to as 'TARDIS', not 'The TARDIS'?)

    I can't remember how the Dr has been referred to in this series...is he 'The Dr' or 'A Dr'?

    If he is an alternative Dr then that might have the benefical side-effect of saving a regeneration; DT could be the 'same' Dr as CE in an alternative leg of time.

    I'm sure the BF audios hold the key to what is going on.

    JF

  82. Re:Once again Doctor Who jumps the shark! by jimbofin · · Score: 1

    Fewer weaknesses? I thought a Dalek being on it's own was the bigest weakness a Dalek could have.

    Running Linux though, I don't don't know, that kinds of make sense, is Linus really Davros?

    JF