Slashdot Mirror


Self-Heating Coffee Hacking

ptorrone writes "Awhile back I wrote about the new Wolfgang Puck self-heating coffee containers that took 10 years and $24 mil to develop. Well, I managed to find them in a local store and bought them to take apart to see how they work. Once activated, they reach 145 degrees in about 6 minutes. This isn't a review of the beverage, it's all about the stuff that makes the liquid hot, how it works, pictures and links to patents. I am looking in to how these could be recycled too."

377 comments

  1. Wikipedia by Avuton+Olrich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He should definitely put that into the wikipedia.

    1. Re:Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should, if only because there seems to be little written about slaking lime on the site. seriously though, is this considered news, the guy dismantled an extremely simple setup, surely it's not /. worthy.

  2. Instantly hot! by LandownEyes · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish that worked on girlfriends...

    1. Re:Instantly hot! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does. But in addition to the coffee mug you need movie tickets, a box of chocolates and sometimes flowers.

    2. Re:Instantly hot! by SportyGeek · · Score: 4, Funny
      I wish that worked on girlfriends...

      Wait, what are those?

    3. Re:Instantly hot! by venicebeach · · Score: 1

      Maybe in 1957, pal. Nowadays if you want instantly hot what you need is about 10 million dollars to go along with that coffee.

    4. Re:Instantly hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish that worked on girlfriends...

      Forget girlfriends. That's what f*ckbuddies are for.

    5. Re:Instantly hot! by imuffin · · Score: 1

      No, silly, you need a different beverage to make your girlfriend instantly hot.

      ---
      watch funny commercials

    6. Re:Instantly hot! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well for "_instanly_ hot" you might just not need a girlfriend but pay $50 to someone on the corner. It is kind of like eating Taco Bell instead of fine cuisine that takes longer to prepare. You get it fast and quick but then you feel sick for a long time. With a girlfriend you need millions, coffee, chocolates, flowers and time but then you might find someone to be with you for the rest of your life.

      Well, I didn't have millions, my girlfriend (now wife) luckily for me overlooked that requirement.

    7. Re:Instantly hot! by anagama · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish that worked on girlfriends...

      Wait, what are those?

      Don't worry about it, coffee is better than women.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    8. Re:Instantly hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually from what I"ve noticed, all you really need are a few cheap beers and a nice body yourself.. I guess that puts all of us out to pasture :-P

    9. Re:Instantly hot! by icedcool · · Score: 1

      See this is one of the common problems with how men view women these days. If you think you have to pay millions etc etc.. then you do. But if you dont you dont. One of my good friends thinks it is easier to get two girls into bed than one. He also knows hes the catch with women. He is broke, has them buy him chocolates/coffee, and only goes out with models.

      All men can do this... I've found out. But whatever... I just think its interesting.

      --
      Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
    10. Re:Instantly hot! by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      I wish that worked on girlfriends...

      It does work, but it still takes 24 million to develop.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    11. Re:Instantly hot! by Lil-Bondy · · Score: 0

      just the way you wrote that it seems women are objects, its nice you have found a 'way' to get women, but please dont make this into another sexist argument, people could take your post the wrong way (btw, im a guy)

      --
      Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job. - HHGTTG
    12. Re:Instantly hot! by modecx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly! Being very empathetic can score you chicks, but it's just as likely to gain shopping partners.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    13. Re:Instantly hot! by The+Creator · · Score: 1
      Wait, what are those?


      Think of them as real world 3D porn.

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
    14. Re:Instantly hot! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Wow, is this kind of thing even legal ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    15. Re:Instantly hot! by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      Well, I didn't have millions, my girlfriend (now wife) luckily for me overlooked that requirement.

      And luckily for me, so did mine :-)
      And she gets instantly hot with just a suggestive look.

      No, I don't know why I responded to this post :-) Sunday morning boredom, I guess.
    16. Re:Instantly hot! by karlandtanya · · Score: 1
      You don't have to put cream in your coffee to make it taste good.


      Ewwww.

      --
      "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
    17. Re:Instantly hot! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      So, instead of paying $50 to someone on the corner, you pay millions to a nice girl to spend the rest of her life with you. What's the difference?

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    18. Re:Instantly hot! by kuldkollane · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm pretty sure the beverage which should be served to get a girl hot varies tremendously.

      One of the most charming abilities a guy can demonstrate is making me a cup of coffee which actually gets me to open my eyes in the morning. The beverage will most probably look and taste like asphalt but that's beyond the point.

      Of course, an ability to choose a god wine doesn't do any harm either, quite the contrary.

      And for my mother it's the tea, and for my best female friend it's buying exactly the right beer. So there.

      --
      I was possibly drunk when writing that.
    19. Re:Instantly hot! by TheScorpion420 · · Score: 1

      or lots of hard liquor, and an opportune moment.

      --
      If you pay your taxes you support terrorism!
    20. Re:Instantly hot! by Stankatz · · Score: 1

      With a girlfriend you need millions, coffee, chocolates, flowers and time but then you might find someone to be with you for the rest of your life.

      That's pretty sad that you fell like you needed to bribe a woman with so much money and attention to get her to like you. Why not find someone who's not so shallow, someone who likes you for who you are?

    21. Re:Instantly hot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't laugh out loud until I reached:

      43. You can have an intelligent conversation with coffee.

    22. Re:Instantly hot! by anagama · · Score: 1

      My all time favorite:

      INSTANT COFFEE!!! ---some lower case to avoid the lameness filter

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    23. Re:Instantly hot! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the nice girl doesn't even want the millions, but the ones on the corner always want their $50 dollars or some big guy with a large sparkly hat comes and beats me up - go figure... ;-)

    24. Re:Instantly hot! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      I was just perpetuating the typical relationship stereotype. My wife does love me for who I am (go figure!) but she still doesn't shy away from chocolates, flowers and Starbucks mochas once in a while - and I am glad to make her happy!

  3. well.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now that they've spent millions on making self heating coffee, how much will it cost to develop re-heated coffee that tastes good?

  4. Google Cache by charon_1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It has a bunch of pictures.. so in anticipation of a slashdotting:
    Google Cache

    1. Re:Google Cache by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's been mentioned time and time again that Google does not cache images. If you want a backup, use the coral cache or Mirrordot

  5. Soup by Punboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This would be great for taking soups along with you. Especially for lunchs or breakfasts, or on hiking trips.

    --
    If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    1. Re:Soup by Speare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except for carrying out all that extra self-heating crap with you. You do pack out your garbage, right?

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      there's a reply on the blog engine that mentions http://www.heatermeals.com/heatermeals.html . apparently these do exactly what you're thinking of and were used extensively in some of the hurricane areas where power was out for days = no alternative for hot meals

    3. Re:Soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You carried it in, can't be any harder to carry it out again.

    4. Re:Soup by ocelotbob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Better to get some of the self-heating pads from army MREs. They're a lot smaller, they get hotter, and they're not designed to be idiot-proof. Much more fun, and better all the way around, plus easier to pack out.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    5. Re:Soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell no, some self-righteous hippy like yourself will come by and clean up my mess while mumbling complaints about people like me.

    6. Re:Soup by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Burnt myself on one of those at the Naval Academy Summer Seminar. Ouch. (... wonder why I didn't get accepted, eh?)

    7. Re:Soup by vought · · Score: 1
      Sure, except who wants to eat Wolfgang Yuck on a hiking trip?

      I'd rather eat a pine cone than his commercialized versions of his already-bad food. So it's got a nifty heater. Still tastes like Yuck. Wolfgag Yuck!

    8. Re:Soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This stuff seems like a complete waste when ReHeater packs have been available for years. All you need to do is boil one for a few minutes to "recharge" and store. http://www.texas-medical.com/hotcold/reheater%20pa cks%20hm.htm

    9. Re:Soup by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Those things actually do taste pretty good, even when they're WAY past their expiration date (by about a year and a half. They are a little on the salty side, though.

      FWIW, someone else mentioned MREs (Meal, Ready to Eat). Basically, this is a civilian MRE.

    10. Re:Soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MREs are still good even when they are 5 to 10 years past the expiration date. Heck, there are even C rations that are no worse to eat today than they were when they first came out.

    11. Re:Soup by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Caches. Who carries all their stuff in with them? You set up caches of stuff ahead of time, about two or three days apart and hike between the caches.

      Leave your trash in the cache, and pick it all up later. Takes some prep, but you can hike longer and use more stuff as you go, without having to carry it all at once.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    12. Re:Soup by kevcol · · Score: 2, Funny

      So let me get this straight-

      To set yourself up, you do the hike the first time, and leave yourself your caches at predetermined intervals.

      Then, when you are ready, you do the hike all over again , happy in the knowledge that you already did the complete hike once to save yourself time and effort.

      Clearly this isn't backcountry backpacking you are talking about.

    13. Re:Soup by hilaryduff · · Score: 1

      also, what happens if they fall down a cliff or get eaten by a bear. or fatally wounded by owls? there would be caches of these space-age cans there for the next half a billion years. something tells me they arent exactly bio-degradeable. i reserve judgement on how they might be recycled or not.

    14. Re:Soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Better to get some of the self-heating pads from army MREs.
      Yeah, but they'll only work if you have a rock, or something.

    15. Re:Soup by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yeah, but they'll only work if you have a rock, or something.

      I don't think anyone appreciates how funny this is. If you've ever seen the directions for how to use the heater packet for an MRE you'd know what this is about. There is a line drawing of someone using the heater and how it must be propped up in order to work correctly since it contains water. There is a label that points to the thing it's propped up against and it says "rock, or something." Brilliant.

      On a side note, I once took my girlfriend camping and I went to the trouble to bring out all the ingredients for stir fry, including the wok. Well, one of my friends showed up with a case of MREs and she decided she'd rather have one of those. Did I write girlfriend? I think I meant to write ex-girlfriend.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    16. Re:Soup by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

      i'd think it'd take more energy to heat up soup since it's thicker and contains a lot more solids unlike coffee which is basically brown water.

    17. Re:Soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "no worse to eat" bit is the scary-but-true.

      As someone currently in the military(not, thank God, in Iraq), I can tell you that an MRE is both an anti-laxative, and full of unpalatable processed food-product.

      But if you have to, get the beef stew one.

    18. Re:Soup by LordofStars · · Score: 1

      Plus you can make an excellent bomb out of it.

    19. Re:Soup by ocelotbob · · Score: 1

      That's the much more fun part. Anything that outgasses hydrogen is fun.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    20. Re:Soup by djlowe · · Score: 1

      You missed the part where he wrote "and pick it all up later, too". So, basically, he does the trip three times.

      Clearly, "ProfaneMuthaFucka" has a lot more free time available than average.

    21. Re:Soup by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      Not really. The same volume of coffee will take longer for exactly the reason you say: it's mostly water. Water's huge thermal capacity is one reason it's popular for fighting most types of fire: it soaks up the heat and cools the fire. Compare the specific heat of water to that of the other soup ingredients.

    22. Re:Soup by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      Had 'em in England about 20 years ago. Don't expect they've made it across the pond yet, though. It seems to take 20 years or more for such things to gain traction over here.

      For example, front-loading washing machines are just becoming popular in the US, but they've been available in Europe for over 30 years. In fact, 25 years ago my wife had a front loading combination washer/dryer - just throw in dry, dirty clothes, run the cycle, take out dry clean clothes... It didn't even need a dryer vent hookup - the hot air was vented via the water pump-out drain. It was the size of a standard washer or dryer.

    23. Re:Soup by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      A detector for those space-age cans would be useful. Then I could travel light and just live off of other people's caches. (I'd leave a thank you note. There's no point in being rude.)

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    24. Re:Soup by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      At least three times. To build up a series of caches either requires a large group where half the team gets sent back at each stage, or a fsck of a lot of trips by one person (with diminishing returns as the cache line gets longer).

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    25. Re:Soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score: -1, Sanctimonious)

    26. Re:Soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if your in a pinch, surrounded by the enemy at night. You can use two MRE heat packs, a couple glow sticks, and a couple other random things that all soldiers will have to make a cool light grenade. When thrown, it sprays the glow liquid all over your enemy so you can see him. ...

      Or at least that's what they taught me at boot camp...

    27. Re:Soup by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      You don't hike along the same trail. Say you are on the Pacific Crest Trail -- you hike in a few miles from one trailhead, set up a cache. Then you go to another trailhead, and set up another cache. You set up several caches along the trail. Then, you start at one end, and hike to the other. You don't have to carry all the extra weight. It can be the difference between a tolerable 30-40 lb pack, and a nightmarish 80 lb pack. Then, when you finish, you go back and collect your trash.

      As to backcountry, there are few places in the lower 48 that are more than a day's hike from some trailhead. There are a few, but not many.

    28. Re:Soup by mike3411 · · Score: 1

      I've been wanting a combo washer/dryer for the longest time. Where did you find that? Seems about a million times more convenient.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    29. Re:Soup by Fjornir · · Score: 1
      Front loading washing machines have been available in the states for as long as I can remember. Top-loaders are popular because they're less likely to ruin your floor from spillage. It's easy to stuff in "that last sock" or whatever a few minutes late, and that has a lot of value...

      Now tell me where to get the combo washer/dryer. PLEASE!

      --
      I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
    30. Re:Soup by kevcol · · Score: 1

      As to backcountry, there are few places in the lower 48 that are more than a day's hike from some trailhead. There are a few, but not many.

      Well it's been some years since I've been backpacking as a kid but the trails I was on were deeper than a day's hike from a trailhead in the Sierras (Kings Canyon and Sequoia NPs) so it wouldn't have worked for what I was used to. But I can see how it works for more accessible trails.

    31. Re:Soup by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Balance the trash left in the woods against the hydrocarbons NOT burned by a guy who dies at a young age, and I think you come out ahead of the game.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    32. Re:Soup by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Where do you go backcountry where you are more than an hour or two away from any road at all for the entire trip?

      You don't hike the route, that would be stupid, unless you're trying to do what the Kalahari Bushmen used to do (and where the idea of placing caches comes from).

      We have roads now, and unless you're in backwoods Alaska you can find places along your route where you hike in an hour or two from a road and place your cache for later.

      If each cache has 4 days of stuff in it, and you have 6 caches sited 4 days hike apart, then you can hike for 28 days and only carry 4 days of stuff at a time.

      It's not a dumb idea. As I mentioned before, Kalahari Bushmen used to place water along their route, enabling foot journeys of many weeks across the desert. They would never make it if they had to carry the water all at once.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    33. Re:Soup by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Take a chill pill, dude. Read the reply to The Phantom. Yes, in the high Sierras, there are several backcountry trails more than a days hike from a trailhead. I know, I've packed a few.

    34. Re:Soup by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      Not a trailhead, a road. Any road. If you can approach within range of a trail on any road, you can leave a cache. Alternatively, you can divert from a trail to approach a road.

      Are there trails in the Sierras where this is impossible for a hike of say, a week? Never hiked there, so I don't know.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    35. Re:Soup by kevcol · · Score: 1

      Understood. The few places I packed (when I did that- and I haven't in many years) were out of road range once you were a day out from where you embarked. One particularly popular trail in Kings Canyon is called Rae Lakes Loop- about 50 miles in length and stunning scenery. I found an excellent travelogue of it here if you are interested:
      http://kevingong.com/Hiking/RaeLakesLoop.html
      The aspen forest once you gain some altitude is awesome. Now looking at that photolog, I'd love to do it again. But yeah, there are other trails in the Sierras that it would be difficult to reach once you went in the backcountry. And I am sure there are plenty that would facilitate the cache method you and Phantom described as well.

    36. Re:Soup by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Kings Canyon definitely has some behicle-inaccessible areas. There are also large parts of Montana and Wyoming, and parts of Idaho, that are rather remote. Other than that, and maybe the Klamath area, I can't think of any place that is more than a day's hike from a some trailhead or road.

    37. Re:Soup by the+phantom · · Score: 1

      er... s/behicle/vehicle

    38. Re:Soup by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      My wife had a combo washer/dryer back in England, about 25 years ago. And I'm not talking about two separate components stacked together either, but I guess you realise that.

      As I recall, it was made in Germany, so it's no surprise that it ran consistently for at least 15 years with no problems except for the one time the drain got clogged. We sold it, still working, before coming to the US about 10 years ago.

      I just tried googling for "combo washer dryer", and this company came out top of the stack: combo washer dryer. Several of their combos are supposed to be ventless, using a condenser to avoid venting moisture, which makes them functionally equivalent to the German machine we used to have.

      Disclaimer: I have absolutely no connection to this company, I don't own any of their products, and at this point in time have no plans to do so.

    39. Re:Soup by surprise_audit · · Score: 1
      When we came to the US about 10 years ago, front loaders were not common - I don't recall if we even saw any on display. Then, about 3 years ago (maybe?) there was this long gushy article in the local paper saying how front loaders were the hot new thing in washing machines, and how they X% less water and soap, and how they use a gentle tumbling action instead of violently swirling back and forth... And so one. My wife's reaction? "Finally, the US is catching up with Europe..."

      The combo we had in England was a German machine, ran for at least 15 years, washing babies clothes every day. Just load it up during the day, then in the evening, set the wall socket time switch to kick the machine on during the night to take advantage of cheaper, off-peak electricty. That way, even "that last sock" can be put in, because the machine doesn't kick in until after midnight.

      I just tried googling for "combo washer dryer", and this company came out top of the stack: combo washer dryer. Several of their combos are supposed to be ventless, using a condenser to avoid venting moisture, which makes them functionally equivalent to the German machine we used to have.

      Disclaimer: I have absolutely no connection to this company, I don't own any of their products, and at this point in time have no plans to do so.

    40. Re:Soup by mike3411 · · Score: 1

      cool stuff, I wonder why these aren't more prevalent. given that washers and dryers are usually around $400 each, the pricing is close to equivalent.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  6. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hot coffee hack? Wait till the ESRB hears about this!

  7. Waste? by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Those seem like such a waste (on top of the $25 million)

    Why did this take so long to figure out? MRE's have been self-heating for a long time and the heater in them gets really hot in less time...

    1. Re:Waste? by poopooboi · · Score: 1

      MREs require several steps, this is one simple step.

    2. Re:Waste? by n0-0p · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I totally agree. I appreciate the Make post on how it works, but this product is taking throw away culture to an extreme. The convenience can't possibly be worth all the manufacturing and materials going into a single hot cup of cofee. And given the way it's packaged, there's no way you're going to reasonably recycle any of this. This is so wasteful it honestly offends me.

    3. Re:Waste? by nic1m · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Maybe this is where government should step in to protect people from their own stupidity. All that stuff for a bit of coffee is insane!

    4. Re:Waste? by gonk · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. See my reply to the article titled "wasteful" or something; well, there isn't much to see, except that it shows my first reaction to the product.

      Anyhow, the sad part about this is that they wouldn't have made the thing if they didn't think people would buy it. I would really like to think people would turn their nose up at something this wasteful. But they won't, at least not for that reason alone.

      robert
      (not claiming to be a model of how folks should live)

    5. Re:Waste? by DarthTaco · · Score: 1

      "on top of the $25 million"

      That money didn't just vaporize, you know.

    6. Re:Waste? by oogoliegoogolie · · Score: 1

      Couldn't agree more. The waste of that just to heat a few ounces of coffee reminds me of a Bugs Bunny cartoon where those two courteous chipmunks ("After you, my good sir." "No, I insist, you go first") end up in a lumber mill and you see entire logs getting shaved down just to make one toothpick.

    7. Re:Waste? by ThndrShk2k · · Score: 1

      But with the Throw-Away culture that we are, there will be millions buying them... And millions of these coffee cups laying around in the trash And tens of thousands of THOSE breaking open and spilling out their heating powder And THEN hundreds of THOSE actually functioning and causing fires... Well I guess that we can get rid of alot of trash indirectly now, by incinerating!

      --

      ~--~
      Do not mind the one with the crazy, for he is sane
    8. Re:Waste? by prockcore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      MRE's have been self-heating for a long time and the heater in them gets really hot in less time...

      Oh man, I can't wait until some lawyer gets sue-happy and sues the military for patent infringement.

      Then a bunch of marines will issue their response by rapelling down from the skylight and dropping their papers on the CEO's desk.

    9. Re:Waste? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      Good thing it takes a lot more then 140 degrees to start a fire - paper generally sets fire at 450F degrees or so.

      A Bic lighter can put out about 1300 degrees F, and a lot of lighters find their way into the garbage.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    10. Re:Waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What, you whizz in a bag and suddenly it's complicated?

      Besides, this is just one food item, not a whole meal.

    11. Re:Waste? by roseblood · · Score: 1

      YOU:

      MREs require several steps, this is one simple step.

      REPLY:

      The can (you didn't RTFA didn't you) shows at least 5 steps. 3(or 4) printed upside down, 2 more printed right side up. More than one simple step for the WGP insta-hot beverage.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    12. Re:Waste? by n0-0p · · Score: 0, Redundant

      So now I'm making my second off-topic post on this story and I apologize. I just noticed that someone duped my post above as a reply to an earlier post so it looks like theirs proceeds mine. You can tell by the time stamps, but now my original post is getting modded down redundant. Has anyone else had this happen and is just a new troll trick?

    13. Re:Waste? by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Good thing it takes a lot more then 140 degree

      140 degrees is the temperature the beverage warms to, isn't it? Wouldn't the actual reaction be hotter than that?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    14. Re:Waste? by name773 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      at the very most they could put a tax on things like this if they really really really felt the need, e.g. if it was starting to be a problem or something. at that point someone could air statements against the use of such items during prime time commercials or something. get some media coverage

      the most ideal solution to me would be other people demonstrating to users of this product what a waste it is and maybe teaching them of the wonderful thermos (those things are sooo cool (or hot, depending)). this is something for society to correct, not the government (i think of them as separate but coexisting entities)

    15. Re:Waste? by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet their mixture tops out at about 140.

      By the pictures, there's a lot of that white stuff and it's all packed around and on the bottom of the coffee. Since it takes 6 - 8 minutes to get it to 140, and there's not a lot of coffee in the cup, I think it doesn't get very much hotter then that.

      Plus, any dumb kid could buy one and bust it open - 140 degrees won't do any damage but 250 could burn you.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    16. Re:Waste? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      I really doubt they spent that much, unless it was to get FDA approval.

      I remember reading about one of the Japanese instant ramen makers working on self-heating soup cups a while ago, maybe the mid-90s. I haven't heard of them since, so maybe these are unrelated, who knows. I can't find any references to them, so I imagine they didn't take off.

      Oh look, one of the first search results I found is to a previous Slashdot story about self-heating cans, dated 2002. Oh, and there's posters there saying they already have self-heating cans of coffee in Europe, circa 2002. Supposedly, they use hydrogen peroxide.

      And MREs are not 'self-heating', they come with a heating pad that you place on a rock or something to heat the meal with. And you have to watch out for the hot hydrogen vapors that come out of it. These coffee cans come with water, and all you need to do is open a tab and wait. It even sounds like you could be holding it while it heats. Saying they're the same is like saying a desktop computer with a UPS does everything that an iPod can do - but I guess that's typical of Slashdot, where people don't understand that convienience is a quality unto itself.

    17. Re:Waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had three WP self-heating cans of coffee. It isn't complicated: Turn over. Pull tab. Push button. Turn upright. Wait 5 minutes. Turn top. Pull tab. Drink.

      Too expensive, though. Paid $2.50 USD for 10oz of coffee. But it was neat.

      Anyway, I remember reading about self-heating cans in the late '80s (either Omni magazine or Popular Science, I think) and they were basically fuled by water and plaster of paris. There were also supposed to be self-cooling cans for sodas, too, but I've never seen those. I think a lot of the money that was poured into these cans, considering the nearly 20 year delay, was to idiot proof them. That is, to make sure no one could hurt themselves and sue.

    18. Re:Waste? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      wouldnt all the coffee turn to steam at 140 degrees? I prefer mine at around 80...

      --
      bickerdyke
    19. Re:Waste? by f()rK()_Bomb · · Score: 1
      wouldnt all the coffee turn to steam at 140 degrees? I prefer mine at around 80...

      kelvin? There are more temperatures scales than celsius you know.

      --
      "The space elevator will be built about 50 years after everyone stops laughing." - Arthur C. Clarke ~1980
    20. Re:Waste? by tf23 · · Score: 1

      I was reading the article and had the same thought.

      We saw a blurb on TV a few weeks back about the US importing other country's trash (one of them was Japan) into our landfills. It is products like this that seem to perpetuate the situation. They scream that the one-use is OK, and don't worry about where this thing goes after you toss it. After all, it's "just the trash".

    21. Re:Waste? by roseblood · · Score: 1

      1Turn over. 2Pull tab. 3Push button. 4Turn upright. 5Wait 5 minutes. 6Turn top. 7Pull tab. 8Drink.

      That makes for 8 steps. Although I imagine "Drink" isn't on the can itself as that should be obvious.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    22. Re: Waste? by Sjobeck · · Score: 0

      On the heals of the G8, the one.org campaign, the End Poverty campaign, etc, etc, etc, etc, where we all now know tht it costs $1 per day to feed a person in Africa, for the US to waste this kind of resources is stunning.

      Disgusting.

    23. Re:Waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but I didn't claim it was one step. I claimed it was simple. It is also self-contained as you don't need to add anything for it to work.

    24. Re:Waste? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      I appreciate the Make post on how it works, but this product is taking throw away culture to an extreme. The convenience can't possibly be worth all the manufacturing and materials going into a single hot cup of cofee.
      Worse yet - the coffee is terrible. It doesn't taste quite like coffee, and the added flavoring is off as well. Nasty, nasty stuff.
    25. Re:Waste? by Wayne247 · · Score: 1

      Then you would be a happy camper (pun intended) if you were to get yourself a nice Flavia machine.

      Ahh those millions of plastic/mylar/whatever pouches piling up the landfills for centuries... can't beat the great taste of individuality by having personally chosen your coffee flavor every morning!

      Yay for humanity!

    26. Re:Waste? by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 1

      " MREs require several steps, this is one simple step."

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
    27. Re:Waste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not the author who wrote "this is one simple step", I am the author who wrote "it isn't complicated" and listed several simple steps.

  8. Seems a bit much for a cup of coffee.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was curious, how much do one of these things go for?

    It seems like an awful waste to engineer all this just for a single use. When I read the article I imagined that this would somehow have multiple uses!

    1. Re:Seems a bit much for a cup of coffee.. by Netscryer · · Score: 1

      Are these only just being seen in the USA? We had them in the UK a couple of years ago, they were really hyped up, but they were damn expensive and haven't lasted.

    2. Re:Seems a bit much for a cup of coffee.. by ryanov · · Score: 2, Informative

      I subscribe to Consumer Reports, which has reviewed them in the 08/05 issue. They apparently go for $9 per four pack. Not TOO much more than current cold coffee drinks, but I think those are more than 10oz, right? I know I usually drink a 16 in the morning.

      A catch, they said, is that you have to store them at room temperature. On a cold day, apparently, they won't get as hot (108 was all that they could get after putting it in the fridge).

  9. Duey, Cheatem and How by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can see the lawyers lining up now. Can't wait to read the warnings on the label.

  10. But why? by pointguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    But why would anyone buy Wolfgang Puck's coffee, which I've never heard him associated with? It's like the idea of buying Lil' Caesar tea... why would I?

    1. Re:But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are we supposed to know who Wolfgang Puck is?

    2. Re:But why? by ryanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno where you are from, but at least in the NY area I've seen a number of Wolfgang Puck cold coffee drinks, akin to the Starbucks variety. They've become pretty common over here, and I think I've seen them in NY Penn Station among other places.

    3. Re:But why? by wvitXpert · · Score: 1

      I've seen Wolfgang Puck on Food Network's "Iron Chef", he is a very well known chef trained in french cooking but with influences from around the world. Why he would have his name on coffee of all things I have no idea.

    4. Re:But why? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Insightful? WTF?

  11. wasteful by gonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, maybe it is neat that they've been able to make this work, but doesn't it seem just a bit wasteful to anyone but me? Western society at it's best, I guess.

    robert

    1. Re:wasteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They have had heating and cooling containers in Japan for at least a decade. Western...?

      Don't hate.

    2. Re:wasteful by gonk · · Score: 1

      Please don't accuse me of hating.

      If they've had this technology in Japan for a decade, why is it such a big deal now?

      robert

    3. Re:wasteful by HardCase · · Score: 1

      If they've had this technology in Japan for a decade, why is it such a big deal now?

      It's not a big deal. Well, except on /., but this isn't exactly the place for the latest news.

    4. Re:wasteful by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      In Japan for a decade? Hell, the civilized world's armies have had these in MREs since the dawn of time!

      (Nevermine the inherent contradictions in "civilized armies," "armies since the dawn of time," "MREs since the dawn of time," "civilized armies," etc. It's still all true, I promise.)

    5. Re:wasteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hate to break this to you,but the only heat I had for my MRE was the generator for my ratrig.In the 80's. So self heating Mres are pretty new.

    6. Re:wasteful by jabuzz · · Score: 1

      Nestle also trialled this back in 2001 time frame int the U.K. under the "Hot when you want" brand. Unfortinately for reasons unknown they never took the product to full market. It was even covered on Slashdot back then so in true Slashdot style we have yet another dupe.

    7. Re:wasteful by batemanm · · Score: 1
      Unfortinately for reasons unknown they never took the product to full market.

      I think the reason would be the taste, it was awful.

    8. Re:wasteful by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I bought a self-heating Nescafe instant coffee in my local corner shop two years ago to see what it was like. It got hot quickly and tasted about as bad as Nescafe usually tastes. I really don't see what the fuss is about.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    9. Re:wasteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I first saw the heating packs in MREs in the early 90's. They certainly did get hot, though! There was one pack that you put in a plastic bag along with the meal packs you want to heat.. just did one, though. Would have been nice to have had another heating pack just for coffee/cocoa/washing/shaving water... Mmmmm

    10. Re:wasteful by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Rather unrelated and off-topic, but isn't usage of scripting languages and similar devices for development a waste of resources, too?

      I always wonder about this. Writing something e.g. in python instead of C may get you 10% developer time, but then you have the additional cycles wasted (leading to more CO2, more fission products whatever..) in the PCs of hundreds, thousands or even hundreds of thousands of users.

      No, I do use python regularly and consider it a wonderful language - this is no flamebait.

    11. Re:wasteful by KylePflug · · Score: 1

      Oh.

      Oh well.

      MREs get danged hot though. I burnt myself on one at the USNA last fall. Lots of food in there too.

  12. GTA tie-in by jridley · · Score: 4, Funny

    After the article earlier about the GTA hack, /.ers will all be much more interested in hot coffee than before.

  13. No reheating? by ViciousVII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would have been interesting if they made seperate compartments or something to allow for reheating later. And on a seperate note, what the hell did they spend $24 million on? The chemical compound? Beyond that everything else seems to be simple and already existing technology.

    1. Re:No reheating? by Punboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Getting Wolfgang Puck to endorse it :-p

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    2. Re:No reheating? by pla · · Score: 1

      And on a seperate note, what the hell did they spend $24 million on?

      Politicians. Even the SUV-loving twits at the EPA balked a tad at the thought of filling our landfills with these plastic monstrosities "constructed like a tank" (straight from TFA) for what amounts to a medium coffee.

      Otherwise... Well, we've all seen "Quik-Heet" hand and foot warmers. Same thing, different (but equally common) set of chemicals. Not a whole lot of R&D needed to figure out "keep the dry part dry and the wet part wet until needed, using an easily punctured membrane".

    3. Re:No reheating? by damian+cosmas · · Score: 1

      "what the hell did they spend $24 million on?"

      Beats me. They take a chemical reaction known since antiquity (cf. Greek Fire), and stick it in a cup of coffee. Maybe all the $$$ went into designing the container. Then again, on the corporate scale, $24m ain't really that much.

  14. The army has been using this tech by Punboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The army has been using this technology in its rations for a loooong time now.

    --
    If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    1. Re:The army has been using this tech by zenneth · · Score: 2, Informative

      The army has been using this technology in its rations for a loooong time now.

      Christ, I've been *out* of the Army since 1990, and we didn't have that technology built into our MREs, so please don't put such an emphasis on the "long" part. I'm getting old, but don't push it.

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
    2. Re:The army has been using this tech by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Brother, 1990 may as well be 90 for all that it matters now. It was so much a different world that it's like we're not even connected, you know?

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    3. Re:The army has been using this tech by evilviper · · Score: 1

      You're just overly sensative. 15 years is a long time, whether you want to accept it or not. (Yes 1990 was when FRHs were introduced)

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  15. "hacking"? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

    Besides the breaking apart of the container (a literal hack since he cut the thing), how is this "hacking"?

    1. Re:"hacking"? by arodland · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That pretty much covers it. Tear it apart, see how it works. That's been the way to "hack" for at least 50 years.

    2. Re:"hacking"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody cares what you think is hacking or isn't hacking.

      Hacking is manipulation of the world around you in clever (or not terribly so clever, but uncommon) ways. PERIOD.

    3. Re:"hacking"? by updatelee · · Score: 1

      I hacked into my boss's computer, I took a zip saw and cut the top off the server, looked inside, ripped everything out with brute force and carnage. left it in a million pieces, took pictures as I went and got onto slashdot with a howto hack a server :)

    4. Re:"hacking"? by Stanneh · · Score: 1

      i guess your right bro i thaught you had to atleast make the cup do something it was not intended for to be a hack as i dont consider opening my ipod shuffle a hack although i may not be supposed to open the device it is meant to be openable so its just not a hack in my opinion.

      --
      I Predict A Riot
    5. Re:"hacking"? by rtv · · Score: 1
      That pretty much covers it. Tear it apart, see how it works. That's been the way to "hack" for at least 50 years.

      Don't we want a little more from a hacker than this definition demands? Some crafty reverse-engineering, a nifty bit of design or code, or a surprising re-use of some existing object? Opening up a coffee pot is interesting, and credit to the authors for writing up the page, but it's not what I would want to call a hack. Here's the definition of "hack" in the Jargon File, A.K.A. The Hacker's Dictionary.

    6. Re:"hacking"? by arodland · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I realized after I posted that I should have said "tear it open, see how it works, find something interesting to do with it" -- but the first two bits are important steps :)

  16. Not a whole lot... by arstchnca · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article notes that the container, while appearing very large, actually holds less coffee than one would originally think. Even after the author removed the insulation, there was still little room for the coffee itself.

    Also, because it uses a water / calcium oxide reaction (basic high school chemistry stuff), which means that it'll heat once and then become nothing more than another cup. While I have no idea how much these retail for, I'm sure that the price is inflated more by the "oh shiny" factor than production or development costs.

    --
    -- arstchnca
    --
  17. But does it work on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    grits?

    1. Re:But does it work on... by grolschie · · Score: 1

      Only if combined with Natelie Portman. err... I am told.

  18. great idea but.... by R33MSpec · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a great idea however the amount of coffee you actually get to drink compared to the mechanism that makes the whole thing work is quite a small amount (i.e like the size of a short macchiato).

    1. Re:great idea but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly enough, approximately 90% of the civilized world, and at least 50% of Texans, know to the drop exactly how much liquid is in a short macchiato.

  19. MRE's by blueforce · · Score: 1

    I still have a bunch of the nifty paper MRE heaters Uncle Sam gave me back in.... '93. Sheesh. I'm getting old.

    --
    If you do what you always did, you get what you always got.
    1. Re:MRE's by DarkVader · · Score: 1

      Exactly - this is another set of stupid patents that shouldn't have been awarded. The "innovation" is putting the water in a breakable container that is broken by pushing a button.

      It's laughable in its obviousness. My reaction when I saw it in a store was "I was wondering how long it would be before somebody started shipping that" followed by "SEVEN DOLLARS!!! Are they NUTS!!!?"

    2. Re:MRE's by tripslash · · Score: 1

      Paper MRE heaters? Did that include matches? Hell, back in the day ('88), if you wanted a warm MRE you could a) sit on it, or b) tuck that brown plastic-wrapped MRE into a bracket mounted near the engine, while cruising the HMMV. Either way, half-warm ham loaf _is_ actually more revolting than cold ham loaf.

  20. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So there it is, an exothermic reaction.

    Good conclusion, Mr Obvious.

    Can I be in the Makezine, too? I've researched why it is that round objects roll better than ones with lots of corners.

  21. 25 Million and 10 years? Right... by XorNand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    25 Million and 10 years? That's like employing 15 scientists and engineers at a good wage (plus room for admin overhead), all working 40 hour weeks for an entire decade.

    For this low-tech device? Something doesn't add up.

    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    1. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Your figures fail to take into account the materials used in its development. That type of stuff could get expensive pretty quick. When you're prototyping something like this you're using some uncommon materials so they're more expensive to deal with, add onto this that some of those materials are being used in similarly uncommon ways and that even common materials (i.e. plastics) are being used in a low volume (molds can be expensive) and it just raises the cost. Beyond that, these are all prototypes, they want to find the one that works the best, so they have to spend this money several times over to get it just right and have a variety of design choices. I'm not saying that their number of $25,000,000 isn't inflated just to impress people, I'm almost certain it is, I'm just saying it's not an outrageous idea that it might cost that much. I mean, developing a product like this is very expensive, they make up for the development cost because the cost to produce the final product is rather cheap and they sell it in a large volume (or at least hope to).

    2. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, grasshopper. This is America, you have missed some things:

      Problem 1: Will it get too hot and burn a petty-lawsuit-starting lawyer?
      Problem 2: No matter how harmless the CaO, will it ever leak out from container failure?
      Problem 3: Will the FDA be OK with out materials?
      Problem 4: How do we make it simple to use?

      That's 4 problems in 10 seconds I thought of. Give them 31536000 times longer, and I'm sure they can come up with more.

    3. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by femto · · Score: 5, Funny
      $10k = scientist to develop the inside of the container.

      $500k = team of engineers to figure out how to make 10 million containers per month.

      $24,490k = marketing guys to decide on shape of the container and what to print on the outside of it.

    4. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by modecx · · Score: 1

      It's probably all in the lawyers to get the thing approved by the FDA/whatever.

      Stupid lawyers make everything cost more.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    5. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by alanlke · · Score: 1

      It's not the stupid lawyers you should be worried about...

    6. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by Mad+Quacker · · Score: 1

      That's called workplace politics. A group of engineers and scientists entrench themselves in a company. Despite making little to no progress or just complete crap for years and millions of dollars, they always look good to the managers that can actually do something about them, because they play the politics. This is what the "other 90%" of engineering and science majors do to make their living.

      Witnessing it firsthand is quite painful for a geek.

      --
      "I don't know that atheists should be considered citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." George HW Bush
    7. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by modecx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, no doubt. The ones that play stupid seem to make it to high office!

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    8. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by Klaus+Obermeyer · · Score: 1

      The largest cost was doubtless making the coffee actually taste of something deserving Wolfgang Puck's name. Masking the taste of various preservatives lending the freshly reheated coffee a pleaseant taste was seomthing that was doubtless not easy.

      Ever tried reheating month-old coffee and experienced it's achrid taste?

    9. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      Hey, ten years of sippin' lattes on a beach in cancun, while lazily & secretly reverse-engineering an Army MRE heater-widget would cost 15 scientists about.... $25 million.

      1> Round up a bunch of caffeine-junkie engineers
      2> Spend 10 years in cancun, 'perfecting' this widget
      3> profit!

    10. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      For this low-tech device? Something doesn't add up.

      It's clearly a front for a black-ops program. With a name like Wolfgang Puck, he must be working on a death satellite or lasers for sharks.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    11. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by ken95357 · · Score: 1

      $10k = scientist to develop the inside of the container.

      $500k = team of engineers to figure out how to make 10 million containers per month.

      $24,490k = marketing guys to decide on shape of the container and what to print on the outside of it.


      You forgot the part where they spend a great deal of time and money figuring out how the product would fail resulting in one of those mega-lawsuits then engineering to avoid it. Those lawyers can get expensive, you know.

  22. American Coffee by nihilogos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pulling it apart is probably the best thing you could do with it.

    You see, the thing that many people in the US completely miss is that the breweing of coffee was perfected in 1855 and it is senseless to mess with it. A shot of espresso made with freshly roasted / ground beans and on a well maintained machine by a well trained barrista is the apex of coffee perfection and cannot be improved upon. There is no substitute, and it cannot be put in an can.

    Why the hell such abominations as the Wolfgang Puck Gourmet Latte and just about everything they serve at Starbacks are permitted to exist is beyond me.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:American Coffee by Planesdragon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You see, the thing that many people in the US completely miss is that the breweing of coffee was perfected in 1855 and it is senseless to mess with it.

      We don't buy that line for ANYTHING, least of all our sources of caffeene.

      Not to mention that the invention of instant coffee added a whole new "ready in the front line" class to the beverage.

      And, of course, the fact is that since we're the land of the free and capitalism and all that, if your "well trained barrista" and whatnot could manage to sell coffee, they'd smack Starbucks around.

      Starbucks et al exist because they make coffee that people drink. Simple story.

    2. Re:American Coffee by Punboy · · Score: 0, Troll

      A shot of espresso made with freshly roasted / ground beans and on a well maintained machine by a well trained barrista is the apex of coffee perfection and cannot be improved upon.

      Why the hell such abominations as the Wolfgang Puck Gourmet Latte and just about everything they serve at Starbacks are permitted to exist is beyond me.

      Well, I'm pretty sure you just answered your own question about Starbucks. Starbucks ensures that all of its drinks are made on well-maintained machines by well-trained baristas. Thus achieving the "apex" of coffee perfection.

      Oh, and lets not forget that there is more to coffee than that. One man's coffee, even if brewed nearly the same as another man's coffee, will taste different. Plus there are different blends and roasting time for different coffees. There are many factors that go into making Starbucks' drinks, and indeed Wolfgang Puck's Gourmet Latte, unique.

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    3. Re:American Coffee by venicebeach · · Score: 5, Funny

      You see, the thing that many people in the US completely miss is that the breweing of coffee was perfected in 1855 and it is senseless to mess with it. A shot of espresso made with freshly roasted / ground beans and on a well maintained machine by a well trained barrista is the apex of coffee perfection and cannot be improved upon.

      Wow, spoken like a true innovator. You must work for Microsoft.

    4. Re:American Coffee by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "A shot of espresso made with freshly roasted / ground beans and on a well maintained machine by a well trained barrista is the apex of coffee perfection and cannot be improved upon. There is no substitute, and it cannot be put in an can."

      Which is exactly why this thing will be a hot selling item. Wake up, not everybody can run off to their corner coffeeshop. I personally think this will be a big hit with fishermen.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    5. Re:American Coffee by sholden · · Score: 1

      Because, in comparison with what they claim is "coffee" in America Starbucks is amazingly tasty.

      Of course compared with coffee everywhere else I've had the pleasure of drinking it Starbucks is swill, but it's all relative.

    6. Re:American Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, spoken like a true innovator. You must work for Microsoft.

      Wow, spoken like a true contributor. You must be an unemployed OSS activist.

    7. Re:American Coffee by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why the hell such abominations as the Wolfgang Puck Gourmet Latte and just about everything they serve at Starbacks are permitted to exist is beyond me.
      Here is why: Most people in America drown their coffee in milk or cream and saturate it with sugar. People don't like coffee, they like a slight coffee flavor. Wolfgang Puck's gourmet latte is the same thing most peoples' coffee tastes like but chilled. Quite frankly, I think it's a little gross, these people are putting so much crap in their coffee that it ceases to be coffee and becomes almost like hot chocolate. Hell, I once worked somewhere where we prepared two different chocolate flavored blends! People that got them were consistently the worst offenders in regards to cream and sugar over-use. I mean, I can understand somebody preferring their coffee with a bit of milk or cream and a packet of sugar, but you go somewhere and watch what people put in their coffee, in my experience it's not uncommon to fill a quarter of the cup with milk and put in three or more packets of sugar. Certainly there are plenty of people who put less or none (and a few who put more) but I would say the average is about as I have stated. I suppose it depends on where you get your coffee though, starbucks would be a little better and most other coffee houses would be a lot better. My experience comes from having worked in a convenience store -- a more average sampling of coffee drinkers in my opinion

      Also, when I said "Americans" before, I didn't mean to imply that this is something that only Americans do, but instead I said that just because that's where my experience is. I understand that people in plenty of other places do the same thing to a lesser or greater degree.
    8. Re:American Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that. It seems that all north american people will drink any kind of dish water, it's quite sad.

      At least I get to enjoy my espressos and lattes when I'm home...

    9. Re:American Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why must every cup of coffee be "perfection?" sometimes you just want a cup of coffee to get you through the morning, and you don't want to pay or wait for the well-trained barrista. And of course, I'm a crude American with poor taste and I can't tell the difference between a good cup of coffee, what Starbucks sells, or even a Folger's instant crystals. Why should I only be able to get my coffee from a "well trained barrista"?

    10. Re:American Coffee by LS · · Score: 1

      Fuck Microsoft's lack of innovation. Our goal is to have nutrition beamed directly into our bloodstream. Innovators, get working!!!

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    11. Re:American Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I've seen some pretty dirty and poorly maintained machines in several different Starbucks. Personally, I think Starbucks coffee is pretty poor tasting.

    12. Re:American Coffee by MacBorg · · Score: 1

      No, they exist because they can sell sugared swill to those who will pay for it. I mean, they are going over to SuperAutos to make their espresso... not even a real bloody machine!

    13. Re:American Coffee by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Pulling it apart is probably the best thing you could do with it.

      You see, the thing that many people in the US completely miss is that the breweing of coffee was perfected in 1855 and it is senseless to mess with it. A shot of espresso made with freshly roasted / ground beans and on a well maintained machine by a well trained barrista is the apex of coffee perfection and cannot be improved upon. There is no substitute, and it cannot be put in an can.

      Why the hell such abominations as the Wolfgang Puck Gourmet Latte and just about everything they serve at Starbacks are permitted to exist is beyond me.


      To make great coffee:

      1. put coffee grinds* into cafetier
      2. add boiling hto water
      3. stir
      4. pour
      5. add cream and sugar to taste

      * for best results, use 100% arabica beans.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    14. Re:American Coffee by SashaMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, spoken like a true innovator

      Wow, you managed to get in the obligatory anti-Microsoft comment on a story about a coffee can. Now that's innovation.

    15. Re:American Coffee by xeno-cat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      While having your coffee made by a profesional is certainly the best, I have found second best to be using a stove top Bialetti espresso maker. These things are amazing.

      Bialetti link

      I have a fairly good espresso maker with a steam wand but have found the Bialetti to be less hasle and it makes better coffee.

      Also, I got a battery powered stove top milk frother that allows me to make as much foam and latte milk as a pan will hold, quickly. I can get stiffer foam out of the steam wand but the stove top frother creates a nice foam that works when I need to make several at once for guests.

      To the sibling poster who said that Starbucks employees are well trained, I beg to differ. What the parent poster is talking about with regards to a profesional is not a graduate of a 2 week course on coffee making. They are talking about someone who has grown up in a culture that has an appreciation for excellence in coffee. You can't get that at Starbucks, no matter how hard they smile. Sadly, Europe is the place I have had the best coffees. I've had close in the North End in Boston. Starbucks is burnt motor oil by comparison.

      Kind Regards

      --
      "A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us w
    16. Re:American Coffee by nihilogos · · Score: 1

      he fact is that since we're the land of the free and capitalism and all that, if your "well trained barrista" and whatnot could manage to sell coffee, they'd smack Starbucks around.

      Bah. Much as I am loathe to quote Michael Moore, we all know capitalism selects the "ruthless but mediocre few."

      --
      :wq
    17. Re:American Coffee by nihilogos · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm pretty sure you just answered your own question about Starbucks. Starbucks ensures that all of its drinks are made on well-maintained machines by well-trained baristas.

      No way. I have been forced into a Starbucks by caffeine withdrawal headaches several times. Even when they're making the first coffee I've had in 3 days it tastes like rubbish. They'd do better if they were trained to crunch the beans up in their mouth and spat into the cup. Or maybe they'd screw that up too. There's no passion in their craft, it's just a part time job to them.

      Plus there are different blends and roasting time for different coffees

      This is exclusively where variety in coffee should come from. A caramel mocha frappuchino is not coffee, and it should not be called as such.

      --
      :wq
    18. Re:American Coffee by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

      Unlike you, most of us don't like to lug around a coffee or Expresso machine while hiking or going out doors. Most coffee places aren't open at the times some outdoor activities start.

      Furthermore, your comment on coffee making is just silly. I think many Cubans would disagree with you on the "apex of coffee perfection" as would any culture are DIFFERENT from your own. I personally prefer Cuban coffee when available, even though I'm not Cuban.

      Starbucks exists because people like them. What a concept! Letting people choose what they like instead of forcing them to accept some existing concept of "perfection".

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    19. Re:American Coffee by nihilogos · · Score: 1

      Nice work.

      I bough a La Pavoni a little while and thoroughly recommend them too.

      --
      :wq
    20. Re:American Coffee by GeoffP · · Score: 1

      A caramel mocha frappuchino is not coffee, and it should not be called as such.

      Ah, but what about the tobaccocino? Surely it must be real coffee.

    21. Re:American Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Invest in a cezve. Sip slowly.

    22. Re:American Coffee by SJ · · Score: 1

      Wow, spoken like a true innovator. You must work for Microsoft.

      So how's that new wheel you are working on coming along?

    23. Re:American Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah. Much as I am loathe to quote Michael Moore, we all know capitalism selects the "ruthless but mediocre few."

      His ruthless distortion of the truth is of course why that fat, mediocre, sack-of-shit is moderately well known.

    24. Re:American Coffee by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Starbucks is overroasted. That's why it's horrible. Properly roasted coffee is what Americans call "light" roast. "Medium" and "dark" roasts are just overroasted.

      Now coffee is an acquired taste. Nobody likes coffee when they first encounter it as a kid (although it does smell good, if brewed properly). Its popularity is mostly derived from its pharmacological effects. Even decaf lovers are probably pining for the caffeine rush they experienced beforehand and unconsciously still associate with coffee. Caffeine itself is bitter, and overroasted coffee is more bitter than properly roasted coffee, so people get it in their heads somehow that the coffee isn't "real" somehow unless it tastes like bitter crap. So there is market pressure to overroast the beans.

      Caffeine's bitterness is actually quite "clean"- it lacks a flavor, and doesn't leave a nasty aftertaste like coffee oils do when they are overroasted. I once (back when I was an analytical chemist at a pharma lab) prepared a caffeine solution by dissolving 150 mL of caffeine in 200 mL water, similar to the concentration in coffee. It is noticeable as hell- there's no ignoring it when you drink it. But, chase it with one gulp of water and it's gone. Coffee has tannic acid in addition to caffeine, which also has a bitter taste, and coffee oils which taste worse and worse the more rancid they get from overroasting and exposure to oxygen. (This is why coffee "burns"- if it sits on the pot more than a half hour it gets this awful smell like burnt hot dogs and the taste is unbearable, hard to wash out of your mouth, and imparts a nasty odor to your breath.)

      The same marketing phenomenon occurs with cough syrups. Usually these have centrally acting compounds like guaifenisin, dextromethorphan, and acetaminophen. They have to enter the bloodstream before they work and so they could just as well be pills. And they should be, since these compounds are extremely bitter, worse than anything even achievable with coffee. But, people won't buy them in that form, because they have the impression that cough syrup won't work unless it coats the throat. So they are sold as disgusting sweet syrups. One product (Thera-Flu) even has you mixing the active ingredients into a hot liquid, as if you're drinking chicken soup or something. Consumers are idiots, but they're always right.

    25. Re:American Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like added sugar in my coffee. I don't like sugared syrups, or any of the odd things one can obtain from Starbucks. I like unsweetened chocolate mixed into espresso cut with a large volume of heated low-fat or non-fat milk. That is to say that I don't like coffee as such, I actually like the flavor of unsweetened chocolate and find that a coffee flavor mixes well with that.

      I find the entire, almost cult-like, coffee following more than a little strange.

    26. Re:American Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the breweing of coffee was perfected in 1855...A shot of espresso made with freshly roasted / ground beans and on a well maintained machine by a well trained barrista...

      Oddly enough the term "barrista" didn't seem to be invented until about 1990. Just about the time Starbucks began their quest for world coffee domination. Now, of course, even someone who hates Starbucks calls the drink maker a barrista and orders coffee in short, tall, and vente sizes.

      http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/Barista

    27. Re:American Coffee by (negative+video) · · Score: 1
      They have to enter the bloodstream before they work and so they could just as well be pills. And they should be, since these compounds are extremely bitter, worse than anything even achievable with coffee. But, people won't buy them in that form, because they have the impression that cough syrup won't work unless it coats the throat. So they are sold as disgusting sweet syrups.
      I always figured it was so the drugs would hit the blood a little faster: they're predissolved, not having to dissolve into the cold water that tablets have to be swallowed with, and have minimum liquid for maximum osmotic pressure. Surely that outweighs the taste problem?

      Then again, I like the taste of single malt whisky...

    28. Re:American Coffee by inflex · · Score: 1

      Hey, since you know about these moka pots --- have you ever seen one of these http://www.pldaniels.com/mokapot.jpg ? (the moka pot, not the mug or the LCD panels ;-)

      It was sent to me from Italy along with some Segafredo vacuum packed grind.

    29. Re:American Coffee by N3Roaster · · Score: 1

      Starbucks ensures that all of its drinks are made on well-maintained machines by well-trained baristas.

      Not quite. Starbucks was a lot better when they were a chain in the Northwest. These days they're just too big. Too many stores and too many people and while they try, it has become impossible for them to keep up with training. This is the real reason behind moving to super automatic machines: to reduce the need for a skilled and knowlegable barista. Of course, that doesn't really work as these machines do go out of adjustment and if the operator doesn't know how to pull a perfect shot of espresso, the chances of that person being able to stay on top of these things with a more automated machine are pretty slim. I'm not going to go as far as another poster and say that super automatic machines are not real espresso machines. Properly cared for, they can produce an excellent drink. I can also see how they'd be useful in restarants and hotels where a properly trained person from the local roastery might be in regularly to make sure everything is okay while delivering the coffee as it would mean better coffee than you would otherwise get at a place that isn't really in the coffee business. There's a gas station a little ways out of town where I am that has a super automatic machine, but the person running the station knows how to deal with it and keeps it running well. I've had worse at real coffee shops.

      Now, there are some places where the Starbucks really does have the best coffee in the area. There's a common misconception that going into the coffee business is a great way to get rich quick and easy, so there are a lot of places where nobody has bothered to learn anything about coffee. After all, it's just coffee, right? But as you say, there's a lot to coffee and there's more to it than even a lot of people who know there's a lot to coffee think there is. That said, it isn't hard to make coffee better than what Starbucks makes. Why?

      Simply because Starbucks is a market leader, but they're in a somewhat sticky situation. You see, while it's true that they produce far less coffee than, say, Sara Lee, they do need to supply more coffee than they can while still sticking to excellent coffees. For example, it would be impossible for them to look at the recent eCafe Ethiopian coffee auction as there isn't enough of it. They seem to think that $1.20 per pound is a premium price. You just don't get the best quality Yemen Mocha Sanani or Papua New Guinea for prices that low. Now, to a large extent that doesn't matter as the Starbucks roast is darker than is really ideal for most coffees. That masks certain distinguishing characteristics across coffees, potentially improving consistency and hiding the lesser defects in these cheaper coffees.

      Bringing this back to espresso, it is interesting to note that this situation is comparable to buying practices in Italy. For all the romantic notions of Italian espresso, Italian roasters tend to get robusta and cheaper arabicas yet coffee establishments in Italy are still able to produce a good espresso. Why? Skilled roasters and blenders, well trained baristas, and good machines would certainly come into the picture somewhere.

      There are certain qualifications a person should have before they are called a barista. At a minimum, they should know the basics of pulling a shot of espresso, steaming milk, and putting together basic drinks. (That you find people who have worked for Starbucks for five years claiming to be a barista yet don't know what an espresso macchiato is says two things about the quality of training needed to become a Starbucks "barista".) More seriously, I would expect someone claiming to be a barista to be able to talk sensibly about the coffees they have available to work with, provide advice to people who a

      --
      Remember RFC 873!
    30. Re:American Coffee by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      not everything requires further innovation, like toilet paper.

    31. Re:American Coffee by DJCF · · Score: 1

      I think the grandparent was joking, being sarcastic, or trolling -- which is a pity as your post is far more accurate. I work in Starbucks myself, and it's true that about half the people we have don't know the first thing about coffee. The other half, however -- including the store manager, assistant store manager, and most of the scenior (non-parttime staff), a very, very knowledgable. I'd like to stress, however, that they reflect how management wants everyone to be and it is *not* acceptable for someone who has worked full-time for over a year to not know what a robusta is. That doesn't mean it doesn't happen, though. In the past, a black apron was awarded to the partner who knew the most about coffee in the store but the new training initiatives are designed so that the staff have to help each other before they can progress to the next level. Hopefully around this time next year, most stores should be "black apron stores".

    32. Re:American Coffee by The+Creator · · Score: 1

      You've obviusly never tried oiled silk sheets. It's lightyears ahead of any other ass wiping technology.

      --

      FRA: STFU GTFO
    33. Re:American Coffee by CharonIDRONES · · Score: 1

      not everything requires further innovation, like toilet paper.

      In case you haven't noticed before, but some Asian countries have innovated in that area. They spray your butt with water :)

      -Brandon

    34. Re:American Coffee by pintomp3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i've tried non-oiled ones, but my gf kicked me out of bed for doing it.

    35. Re:American Coffee by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1

      So are you saying that there should be One True Way to enjoy coffee?

      Dude, different people like different things. That's all it is. I love good wine to the point that I make a few gallons every year, but I'd still rather have a burger than lobster (yuck!).

    36. Re:American Coffee by sholden · · Score: 1

      Surely a large part of the reason for cough syrups is that parents give them to children.

      Giving cough syrup to my toddler is hard enough - giving him a pill would be next to impossible. I'd rather have him not choke to death thanks.

      So my guess would be that cough syrups are syrups because that's what they were when we were kids and hence that's what we look for as adults?

      As for Thera-Flu it's encouraging you drink some more fluids, which is a good thing - maybe the company is hoping that the increase in fluid intake will make people feel a little better and attribute that to the product?

      As for overroasted coffee that might be what the market wants in America - which I blame on them drinking the dirty water they call coffee and then experiencing Starbucks (which truly is much better ). People who have drunk non-american coffee notice that Starbucks tastes crap - but in America they have no choice anyway, espresso everywhere else is just as bad...

      And 150ml in 200ml seems high. There's about 100mg of caffeine in an espresso shot which is 30ml so about 30g of water. So 1:300 by weight. Since caffeine is a solid at room temp, I'm not sure how your 150ml was made (I'm guessing dissolved in water rather than melted, in which case it could contain anythng from 0mg to whatever the saturation limit is - which I can't be bothered looking up). Or are my recollections completely wrong?

    37. Re:American Coffee by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If you're getting headaches from caffeine withdrawal, the last think you should do is have some more coffee. The thing you do is to NEVER HAVE ANY AGAIN. Caffeine doesn't wake you up, you're just addicted to it so you need the caffeine to stay awake. When you're not addicted to it, you're just as awake as a caffeine addict after 5 cups.

      The only time you can get a benefit from caffeine is if you're someone who doesn't drink caffeine except the rare occasional cup. Anything else and you're just fulfilling the self-perpetuating addiction.

      As for Starbucks, they don't sell coffee, they sell image. Unless you count a watery, sugary froth served in a flimsy cup as 'coffee'. Like a lot of companies, they survive on marketing.

    38. Re:American Coffee by drsquare · · Score: 1

      Well what else do you expect from a chain business? Starbucks is the McDonalds of cafés. The whole point of a Starbucks is to make money, the same as KFC or Tescos. Quality is the bare minimum needed to keep the profits up. If you want quality go to a decent independent place where the motive for running it is reputation rather than money.

    39. Re:American Coffee by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I'm sure that fishermen know how to operate kettles. And they're not the sort who drink espressos either, or who care about freshly roasted beans or barristas.

    40. Re:American Coffee by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      Much as I am loathe to quote Michael Moore, we all know capitalism selects the "ruthless but mediocre few."

      That's for the jobs where a ruthless but mediocre choice is the cheapest.

      Best example to counter your quote: Apple. While arguably ruthless, they don't make their dollars by being mediocre.

    41. Re:American Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cleaning one's rear with water is not an innovation. It, like many other rear-end cleaning technologies, has been around for centuries.

      Even if you don't consider the ancient "rinse with water from a pitcher" technique that has been in use for thousands of years, the bidet was invented in the middle ages.

      The toilets that you mention basically have built-in bidets. The only real "innovation" is that they have built in drying fans as well.

    42. Re:American Coffee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter if they care. They SHOULD NOT be allowed to get coffee any other way. So says nihilogos.

    43. Re:American Coffee by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      They're sold in pill form as predissolved gel-caps. Always get them in that form unless they're more expensive or it's for a kid who will like the sickly-sweet syrup better. Thera-Flu (where you dissolve powder in hot liquid) is just for idiots who think they're buying chicken soup.

      When I was 7 I got pneumonia and had to take penicillin. I was scared to swallow the pills so I chewed the first one. That taught me really fast!

    44. Re:American Coffee by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      As for overroasted coffee that might be what the market wants in America

      I agree it's what the market wants. Markets don't always have smart reasons for wanting things- just look at real estate. In the case of cough syrups, as you mentioned, it could either be that individual consumers are looking for the crap their mothers gave them as kids, or it could be that people think the syrup acts topically, not centrally, and has to coat the throat. They add propylene glycol and glycerin to those syrups. Those ingredients both add sickly sweetness AND are sticky and gooey, consistent with both theories.

      And 150ml in 200ml seems high. There's about 100mg of caffeine in an espresso shot which is 30ml so about 30g of water. So 1:300 by weight. Since caffeine is a solid at room temp, I'm not sure how your 150ml was made (I'm guessing dissolved in water rather than melted, in which case it could contain anythng from 0mg to whatever the saturation limit is - which I can't be bothered looking up). Or are my recollections completely wrong?

      150 mg in 200 mL. A 7 oz cup of coffee is about 200 mL and has between 110-190 mg of caffeine. (Compared to a 12 oz Coke which has 50 mg, a 12 oz Mountain Dew which has 60mg, or a Jolt which packs 100 mg caffeine in 12 oz. Even Jolt is still only half coffee's strength, but they make up for it in disgustingness by adding twice the sugar of Coke.) A saturated solution of caffeine at room temperature has about 10 mg/mL IIRC, about 15-20X that of coffee. But the solubility of caffeine varies enormously with temperature compared to other solutes. In boiling water it approaches 1:1. If you create a saturated solution in warm water you can see needlelike crystals nucleate around particles of dust in the water as the water cools. They look a little like spiky snowflakes.

    45. Re:American Coffee by xeno-cat · · Score: 1

      Looks like it is functionaly the same but scores higher on the geek sheek scale. Although, Bialetti's have a hackish charm I like.

      I haven't seen that one in particular but have seen several different makes that I like.

      Kind Regards

      --
      "A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us w
    46. Re:American Coffee by inflex · · Score: 1

      This one is a Bialetti system (it pressures up then pops, rather than the continuous feed) but is just branded by Segafredo.

      Oh well, it works well (though the first time you use it it scares you a little) and makes some fine coffee.

      Thanks.

    47. Re:American Coffee by bob65 · · Score: 1
      People don't like coffee, they like a slight coffee flavor.

      That's true. I don't like coffee either, but I do like a slight coffee flavour. I don't like drinking plain coffee, because, quite frankly I think it's gross. I do however, like drinking sugar and cream with a big of coffee flavour for a nice added touch. I don't see how that's any more or less gross. And also don't see how sugar or cream or any of the other stuff in lattes is any more or less crap than coffee.

      Lattes and stuff is just another kind of hot chocolate, and there's nothing wrong with that.

  23. I have an idea! by elmegil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's just plug the MAKE blog's rss feed into Slashdot directly!

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    1. Re:I have an idea! by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1

      Let's just plug the MAKE blog's rss feed into Slashdot directly!

      Great Idea!

      Don't forget to add Thinksecret and space.com.

      --
      Stop the world; I need to get off.
  24. Wrong mineral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silicone oxide is the right one.

  25. Coral cache by Codester · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lots of pictures... try this Coral cache

    -Code

  26. a better way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why not just drop in a couple of nanograms of antimatter. Heats my coffee just fine.

    1. Re:a better way... by Ziggy7273 · · Score: 1

      that would use even more energy!

    2. Re:a better way... by incabulos · · Score: 2, Funny

      Antimatter would do a great job heating it up, but at the loss of a portion of the coffee, which would be annihilated. I hate seeing good coffee wasted, even on such an efficient process as total conversion of matter to energy.

      Fitting a magnetic bottle and cyclotron into a small portable coffeecup is also somewhat of a dilemma.

    3. Re:a better way... by mako1138 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Off topic, but...

      The energy in a matter-antimatter (proton anti-proton) reaction goes toward the production of various particles that are of sufficiently high energy to pass right through your coffee: muons, gamma rays. Neutrinos too, which don't interact.

      Under the unrealistic assumption that all the energy produced goes toward heating the coffee:

      2ng matter + 2ng antimatter = 4e-9 g

      E = m*c^2
      = 4e-9 g * (3e8 m/s)^2
      = 3.6e8 g*m^2/s^2

      A joule is kg*m^2/s^2, so we're looking at 3.6e5 J of energy. Approximating coffee with water, water has a heat capacity of 4186 J/(kg*K), and assuming we have 100 cm^3 of it:

      3.6e5 J / 4186 J/(kg*K) / 0.1 kg = 8600 K

      I hope you like your coffee vaporized.

    4. Re:a better way... by dougTheRug · · Score: 1

      8600 Kelvin has to be more of a coffee plasma. I'm sure that would change the taste considerably. Probably for the worse.

    5. Re:a better way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heating coffee causes you to "loss a portion of the coffee." It's called steam.

    6. Re:a better way... by mako1138 · · Score: 1

      I put an extra zero in there, so it's actually 860K. Besides, I realize now that I neglected the heat of vaporization, which is 2260 kJ/kg.

      Figure that the coffee starts at 10 degrees Celcius. We need 90 degrees of change to get it 100.

      90 * 4186 J/(kg*K) * 0.1 kg = 37674 J

      That's 10% of our energy budget. Another 226 kJ are required to vaporize the lot, 63%. The remaining 27% of energy is 96326 J. The heat capacity of water vapor is 1.84 kJ/(kg*K).

      96326 J / 1840 J/(kg*K) / 0.1 kg = 523.5 K

      Or 623.5 degrees Celcius.

  27. Aha! but... by DerKwisatzHaderach · · Score: 0

    does it run linux?

  28. candidate for sabotage by 5plicer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet you'll start seeing obnoxious pple going through all of a store's stock pushing the heat button on each of the cans so that the end customer gets cold coffee :p

    --
    The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
    1. Re:candidate for sabotage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, guess people will have to check the pink oval before they buy. Presumably it stays white after heating rather than turning pink again.

    2. Re:candidate for sabotage by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right after I finish squishing the Wonder bread, my good man. Right after.

    3. Re:candidate for sabotage by mpath · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually - they put a tennis ball can lid (you know, the kind that you have to pop & peel?) over the heat button to curtail that.

      --
      I'm not sure what the secret to success is, but the secret to failure lies in trying to please everyone -Bill Cosby
    4. Re:candidate for sabotage by PhotoGuy · · Score: 1

      Right after I finish squishing the Wonder bread, my good man. Right after.

      But we can't let ourselves be afraid, and deterred from shopping by these grocery vandals. If we do, then they will have won.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  29. How much?? by rerunn · · Score: 2

    Anyone know how much one of these things cost? Do is it even taste good? I cant imagine it would be any better than any other instant coffee.

    1. Re:How much?? by kent_eh · · Score: 1
      Anyone know how much one of these things cost?

      According to the all knowing Google:
      $9 per four-pack of espresso, mocha, caramel, or French vanilla flavors
      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    2. Re:How much?? by Lehk228 · · Score: 1, Troll

      $7.00, ass

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    3. Re:How much?? by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

      they did a story on this on the local news and let a bunch of ppl try it. first they wanted to see if it was too complicated for joe street, and then how they liked it. most of the ppl fumbled at first, but got it working ok. all of them said it tasted good. still a waste though.

    4. Re:How much?? by Subrafta · · Score: 1

      $12 for a 4-pack at our local Krogers.

      --
      Vuja De: That sinking feeling that this is going to happen again. Often occurs in meetings with Product Managers.
    5. Re:How much?? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Anyone know how much one of these things cost?
      I don't recall the exact price - but it's about 2-2.25 times the per oz cost of the fresh stuff. (And it's not as hot.)
      Do is it even taste good?
      It's utterly vile. The coffee is a weird weak coffeoid flavor - and the added flavors seem to have been the cheapest possible extracts/synthetics.
      I cant imagine it would be any better than any other instant coffee.
      This stuff makes the instant crap you find in hotel rooms taste like ambrosia.
    6. Re:How much?? by gnuyarlathotep · · Score: 1

      All the hotels I have stayed in the past ten years have had actual coffee makers and "normal" ground coffee to use in them. Granted the coffee is already inside a inclusive filter, but it's certainly better than instant. Are there places so cheap that they still have instant in your room?

  30. Cute hack... but how does it taste? by i+love+pineapples · · Score: 1

    Has any of ./'s coffee nerds had a chance to try this stuff? The concept sounds kind of gross to me-- I can't imagine reheated coffee tasting all that great-- but I'd buy a couple for "emergencies" if they found some way to make it good. Can anybody comment on the taste?

    1. Re:Cute hack... but how does it taste? by ryanov · · Score: 1

      I'd expect it to taste roughly similar to most of these sweet coffee drinks. Don't forget, these things really aren't about coffee anyway... too much sugar, etc., in them.

    2. Re:Cute hack... but how does it taste? by headonfire · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'll say that I tried the stuff just for the Shiny Factor ("Oooh! Shiny!"), and shockingly, it's not tremendously bad. I've had much, much worse cups of candy-coffee crap fresh from the spouts of the art wankers and the pimply-faced youths manning coffee machines at various coffeehouses and restaurants across the nation. For candy-coffee crap in a can, well, it's what you get, you know?

      I had the mocha latte, and, well, it tasted like coffee, cream, sugar, and chocolate stuff made by some jackass college kid with a bad haircut.

      But yeah, so, now - the next step is to figure out how to recycle the fucking things. They're like ten pounds each and the size of my left testicle - freaking huge. Feels kinda wrong to just toss them away.

      The cans too, I mean.

  31. which liquid? by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    You can easily remove the liquid and use it for something else.

    Which Liquid man?! I'm so confused already!!!

    Do I remove the coffee and heat my "hot choclate" or do I remove the water and wash part of my hand?

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    1. Re:which liquid? by dtungsten · · Score: 1

      Even more confusing: maybe you could do both?

  32. Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    "This is so wasteful it honestly offends me."

    Condoms are wasteful too.

    1. Re:Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your welcome to wear this as a condom

    2. Re:Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just make sure it doesn't heat up to 145 degrees on you.

    3. Re:Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by Oopsz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but are cheap to create, use little raw materiel, have a small waste footprint, and their production and use are in the public interest (epidemiologically speaking).

    4. Re:Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not like you'll ever have to use them...

    5. Re:Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Condoms are not only wasteful but they defy God's Will. When you fornicate with a condom you are very likely destroying one of God's creations before he or she even has a chance to live.

      We are becoming more and more powerful every day and we will overturn Griswold.

    6. Re:Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Than I suppose it is safe to say by (sadly) not fornicating today I have also defied God's will. I'll go to confession tonight and try to do better tomorrow, I promise.

    7. Re:Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You know, the real meaning of such statements completely eludes me. Forgetting for the moment that "God's Will" is, shall we say, subject to interpretation, let's take a closer look at this. For example, if I simply choose not to fornicate at all, the end result is exactly the same as if had had sex but used a condom effectively. Would that be against His Will? Presumably it would be (.e.g, no babies) so I should under no conditions wear a condom or abstain from sex, and always avail myself of an opportunity to inseminate a woman (I think I just described Slashdotter heaven, but that's a discussion for another day.)

      In keeping with our desire for 100% expression of God's Will, women should be required to have sex with any man that desires them, with (ahem!) stiff penalties for every act of refusal. Under ideal conditions, then, every act of intercourse should result in one (or more) offspring. Furthermore, women should be required to be continuously pregnant because (of course) if a woman isn't pregnant then yet another one of God's creations is being denied expression.

      Actually, what we should be doing is developing a drug which will force a woman's ovaries to expend all of their eggs over the course of her reproductive years, so that not a single one of God's potential creations is left unborn. Kind of an anti-prophylactic quintuplet enhancer, you might say. Of course, the misery and suffering that would inflict upon an already overpopulated world would be, well ... Biblical.

      I don't know how we could possibly handle converting the trillions upon trillions of excess sperm cells into babies, though. There aren't enough eggs on the planet. You need to face facts: the reproductive systems of humans and most plants and animals are extremely "wasteful" of genetic material, and in our case are no more or less wasteful whether a given act of intercourse results in implantation ... or not.

      Unless what you're really saying is that all the pleasure a man and a woman can generate between them is inherently wrong and against God's Will. For a whole lot of people, that's about the only thing they have to make life tolerable, and in my not particularly humble opinion it wrong be immoral to take that away from them. There's enough suffering already on this stupid planet, thank you very much. More of God's Will, I suppose.

      When you get right down to it, given all the other less-useful things our civilization throws into its landfills, condoms are at the bottom of the wastefulness scale.

    8. Re:Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by Charles+W+Griswold · · Score: 1

      Condoms are not only wasteful but they defy God's Will. When you fornicate with a condom you are very likely destroying one of God's creations before he or she even has a chance to live.

      All together now: "Every sperm is sacred. Every sperm is great. If a sperm is wasted, God gets quite irate."
      --
      "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber" -- Plato
  33. Where do you buy these things? by Oriumpor · · Score: 1

    I haven't even seen a glimpse of these things in cali and for all the searching it was worth I couldn't find anyone selling them online...

    1. Re:Where do you buy these things? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At Kroger's on Shilo and 190. Its in Garland, TX though...

    2. Re:Where do you buy these things? by evolutionaryLawyer · · Score: 1

      Just saw a bunch of these sitting on the counter at a White Hen in Chicago just today. Didn't know what it was but remember seeing wolfgang puck on the side and thinking he had done some of those campbell's drinkable soups. Guess I know now.

  34. There are 2 patents on this thing... by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Informative

    [/rant]
    The hack is cool.

    But this crappy coffee can is worthy of a patent? A calcium oxide/water reaction learned in any highschool advanced chemistry class?

    Reading the patent below, I must wonder if those who give out patents get lost in the gobbely-gook of the descriptions not to see that it seems to fail the basic requirements of a patent:

    http://www.patentsearchexpress.com/requirements.ht ml

    Especially in the view of non-obviousness in view of prior art. Self-heating pads using assorted chemicals have been around for a long time. How long was it before someone applied it to not to hands but to food/drinks which we've been warming up since like forever. This is question of application, not innovation.

    I also have to question the $24 million to develop this thing. Reminds me when GE (or maybe whirlpool???) came out with front-loading washers like 10 years or so ago and announced it took $100M to develop and spouting all the benefits of the system (lower water consumption, etcetera). When the europeans have been using front-loaders since at least the '50s, you gotta wonder who's been embezzling all that cash.

    [/rant]

    (From The article}
    United States Patent 5,461,867
    Scudder , et al. October 31, 1995
    Container with integral module for heating or cooling the contents

    Abstract
    An outer container for holding a material, such as a food, beverage or medicine with a sealed thermic module inside the container. The thermic module contains chemical reactants that mix upon actuation of the container by a user. Mixing of the reactants produces an exothermic or endothermic chemical reaction, depending upon the reactants selected. The contents of the outer container surround a portion of the outside surface of the thermic module, thereby facilitating conduction of heat. The thermic module has a hollow module body that is closed at one end and a module cap that seals the other end of the module body. The module body contains the solid reactant, and the module cap contains the liquid reactant. The module cap has a tubular section with a flexible member closing one end and a breakable barrier closing the other end. With the exception of the barrier, the cap is of unitary construction. The cap has one or more integrally formed prongs extending from the inner surface of the disc toward the barrier. The prongs move in an axial direction toward the barrier and may also spread apart radially when the outer surface of the flexible member or an actuator connected to it is depressed by the user's finger. The dual motion of the prongs in both axial and radial directions promotes complete puncturing of the barrier and thus fast mixing of the reactants.
    Link.

    1. Re:There are 2 patents on this thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, water+CaO for heating things has been known for a long time. It looks like they're claiming the container rather than the chemicals though, and it's likely that no one has made a container in exactly that shape before, so the patent claims may be sufficiently narrow to not be invalidated by prior art.

    2. Re:There are 2 patents on this thing... by HeyLaughingBoy · · Score: 1
      Reading the patent below, I must wonder if those who give out patents get lost in the gobbely-gook of the descriptions

      Somewhat OT, but I doubt it. We just got back a USPTO response to a patent we filed and my first impression was that the patent examiner was a really smart guy. It was obvious that he took the time to understand the complex software system we described well enough to be able to find previous examples of different parts of the system and show that our submission was a combination of several examples of prior art.

      These guys deal with complex technical documents that were "enhanced" by lawyers every day, I doubt they get confused by it.
    3. Re:There are 2 patents on this thing... by Captain_Chaos · · Score: 1

      Reading the patent below, I must wonder if those who give out patents get lost in the gobbely-gook of the descriptions not to see that it seems to fail the basic requirements of a patent:

      You're new here, aren't you?

  35. This has been available for ages. by sakusha · · Score: 1

    Self-heating cans have been around for ages and ages. I remember seeing ads for self-heating canned foods for camping back in the early 1980s. I first saw a can of self-heating sake in the Tokyo Hilton in 1996, ever since then I've been kicking myself for not buying it from the overpriced mini-bar. Self-heating foods are a staple of MREs in the US Military, it uses the same exothermic chemical packs.

    So, what's so special about the coffee cans now?

  36. ho hum... nothing new here. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The military has been doing this for YEARS.
    MRE heaters.. No big deal. You can buy them by the crateloads at gun shows for 50 cents each, will heat a meal in a few minutes, just add water. Stores forever.
    Must have items if you live on the coast where you may lose power from hurricanes, etc..

    (one of MANY places to get the things..)
    http://militarysurplusdepot.com/m_r_e_heater.html

  37. Pffft--- by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    you've never woken up late- and JAMMED your butt into the car, and had NO TIME..?

    I want a case of this on the backseat of my car.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:Pffft--- by (negative+video) · · Score: 1
      you've never woken up late- and JAMMED your butt into the car, and had NO TIME..?
      I did it the other way round once (car into butt). Let me tell you some warm liquid would have been pretty soothing.
  38. McWolfgang Lawsuit by TheStonepedo · · Score: 0

    It looks like, for the first time I can think of, the consumer is responsible for non-home-made coffee. In the event that coffee is purchased in stores to-go, the cups contain CYA disclaimers that the coffee is hot and can scald. This coffee, from the pictures I saw, has no disclaimer for its dangers. Many consumers will have little idea how the cup "magically" heats itself.
    Is the pushing of a button on a cup enough action on the consumer's part to save the company from all liability?

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
    1. Re:McWolfgang Lawsuit by corsec67 · · Score: 1
      the coffee is hot and can scald.


      If the coffee cup starts out fairly warm (like 80 degrees F), then it gets too hot to drink after 5-6 min, and then I have to wait up to 10 min for it to cool down enough to be drinkable.

      Both me and my friends have experienced this, where it starts out cold, gets nice and warm, then gets very hot, then gets nice and warm again.
      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    2. Re:McWolfgang Lawsuit by headonfire · · Score: 2, Funny

      jesus, not hot coffee, anything but hot coffee.

      What do you expect? Just don't put it on your nuts and you'll be fine.

  39. Mr Obviousman to the rescue! by paiute · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't believe that noone has made the obligatory joke about the old woman who spills the Wolfgang Puck coffee on herself and then sues him for millions.

    Followed by the debunking replies who will supply the link to snopes.

    Followed by the bashing of lawyers.

    Then someone will blame it on MS/USPTO/RIAA/SCO.

    By then it will have thankfully dropped to the bottom of the page and then into old news.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Mr Obviousman to the rescue! by SonOfFlubber · · Score: 1

      They will; you'll just have to wait for the Duplicate Post first.

    2. Re:Mr Obviousman to the rescue! by Hard_Code · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of hype about the McDonalds' scalding coffee case. No
      one is in favor of frivolous cases of outlandish results; however, it is
      important to understand some points that were not reported in most of
      the stories about the case. McDonalds coffee was not only hot, it was
      scalding -- capable of almost instantaneous destruction of skin, flesh
      and muscle. Here's the whole story. ...

      A vascular surgeon determined that Liebeck suffered full
      thickness burns (or third-degree burns) over 6 percent of her body,
      including her inner thighs, perineum, buttocks, and genital and groin
      areas. She was hospitalized for eight days, during which time she
      underwent skin grafting. Liebeck, who also underwent debridement
      treatments, sought to settle her claim for $20,000, but McDonalds
      refused. ...

      McDonalds also said during discovery that, based on a consultants
      advice, it held its coffee at between 180 and 190 degrees fahrenheit to
      maintain optimum taste. He admitted that he had not evaluated the
      safety ramifications at this temperature. Other establishments sell
      coffee at substantially lower temperatures, and coffee served at home is
      generally 135 to 140 degrees.

      Further, McDonalds' quality assurance manager testified that the company
      actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185
      degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a burn
      hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above,
      and that McDonalds coffee, at the temperature at which it was poured
      into styrofoam cups, was not fit for consumption because it would burn
      the mouth and throat. The quality assurance manager admitted that burns
      would occur, but testified that McDonalds had no intention of reducing
      the "holding temperature" of its coffee.

      --

      It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  40. very cool by andersen_hc · · Score: 1

    i see those self-heating coffee things so rarely though. Is there something wrong with them, or was it a waste pf R&D dollars because there was no market for it?

    1. Re:very cool by gerardrj · · Score: 1

      You don't see them because they are expensive and cumbersome. The heating portion of the unit takes up quite a large volume of the container. What looks like a large cup of tasty hot food stuff turns out to be only a few swallows worth.
      As with any mechanical device placed in consumers' hands, there is a risk of malfunction; either not heating, getting too hot, leaking, not opening/dispensing, etc. It doesn't take too many of those incidents to get a significant number of disgruntled customers. Disgruntled customers tend to share their experience with others who then don't buy.

      A similar fate became of the self-cooling soda cans. They couldn't change the size of the container since all the vending machines were built for the standard can size. That meant there was less soda in the can since it was displaced by the cooling apparatus. Same price, less soda = unhappy customer. Turns out it's cheaper to run the refrigeration system to keep the cans cool than invent/impliment per-can cooling.

      The only place these self-heating, self-cooling gizmos are really in demand is in military environments. aNd then the temperature unit and food product are two separate parts to minimize waste due to failure (among other reasons).

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  41. Wow! by iamdrscience · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Finally I can get a hot cup of coffee anywhere I go, because, you know, it's not like there's a place to buy coffee on every corner.

    Oh wait, Starbucks...

    ...and a million other convenience stores, restaurants, cafes and coffeeshops.

    1. Re:Wow! by reklusband · · Score: 1

      I've had this many times before. The exact same product, the only difference is the container was smaller and it was in italian...most small italian grocers and deli's have this stuff around the holidays for years now...the exact same triggering mechanism, the same product, the only difference is size. Why the hell is this product being marketed as new?

    2. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because jesus wants you to waste god's materials...see the thing is we can't all go to heaven until everybody's dead...everybody can't die until the world is completely fucked, so the faster the better!!!

    3. Re:Wow! by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      Now that I think of it, I know exactly what you're talking about. I've had the same thing, it was from an italian pastry shop, only this was a chocolate drink, not a coffee drink. You press in the bottom and it's all set in less than a minute (maybe you had to shake it or something, I forget). I would think though that anything made from a container like that couldn't taste any better than regular instant coffee and, well, I'm far from a coffee connoisseur, but even I think instant coffee is straight crap.

    4. Re:Wow! by luferbu · · Score: 1

      Yes, in some big Spanish hotel chains they provide in every room "instant hot drinks" for some time now.

  42. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes finally, a ham radio article on /.

  43. This would be awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if there weren't coffee shops everywhere, and microwaves everywhere else.

  44. Reminds me of the spoon in a lid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever happened to the snap together spoons that Danon embedded in its yogurt container tops? Nifty stuff. Wonder how much it cost to develop and produce that in comparison?

  45. What a waste! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    So that's what those things were! I saw those in the grocery store the other day. A package of four coffees cost about ten dollars! That's worse than those retarded Starbucks bottled "Frappuccinos." They look weird, like those thermos-like narrow and tall coffee cups that you can take on the road (like Starbucks used to sell, which I know only because someone gave me one as a gift), yet they look strangely like something you are supposed to microwave or something. Only you can't because on the inside of this cup, there is what appears to be an aluminum can.

    I couldn't gather, by looking at it, whether they're reusable or disposable. If they're reusable, it stands to reason that they should sell such a contraption "empty" (perhaps coffee grounds included in the package or sold separately) for people who could use such a thing. If they're disposable, it seems like an awful waste.

    Oh well. Wolfgang Amadeus Puck.

    1. Re:What a waste! by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      They are very much single-use. Also, the lid where you drink is glued down, so you can't buy 4, take out the liquid easily, and put your own in.

      The glue melts when the beverage is hot, releasing the lid. The point of the lid is to make sure that it doesn't explode while it is heating up.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  46. Yeah, it's worth a patent by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    That abstract is pretty specific in its description of the system. In patent negotiator speak, it's a "narrow" patent. Narrow patents generally cover a very specific implementation (used to prevent direct cloning of a product in most cases), but due to their specific nature are easy to work around.

    Essentially, this patent doesn't cover CaO heaters in general, it covers this particular cup design. It wouldn't be too hard for any competitor to develop a cup that did the EXACT same thing without infringing on that patent because it's so narrow and specific.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    1. Re:Yeah, it's worth a patent by the_quark · · Score: 1

      Yes, this patent is *very* specific:

      "With the exception of the barrier, the cap is of unitary construction." So, make the cap of two or more pieces. "The cap has one or more integrally formed prongs extending from the inner surface of the disc toward the barrier." So, have the prong not be integral. "The prongs move in an axial direction toward the barrier and may also spread apart radially when the outer surface of the flexible member or an actuator connected to it is depressed by the user's finger." So, don't have the user press anything - maybe a twisting motion?

      This patent is very, very specific to this individual design. The exothermic reaction is almost secondary to the patent claims.

  47. Gatorade Bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What we used to do in the Marines with the MRE heaters is make fun Gatorade bottle bombs (will scare the hell out of a nearby mark). Basically, you break up the heaters, put them into an empty Gatorade bottle. Add a LITTLE bit of water, twist cap on, and set. In about 4 minutes, you have one hell of a bang. I'm sure the same concept could be applied to this... turning useless products into a fun practical joke.

    1. Re:Gatorade Bomb by Ill_At_Ease · · Score: 1

      MRE heater bombs! Just what I was thinking. Better yet, crap in a MRE bag with the heater inside a bit of water hanging from a tree when you're being tracked! Crappow! Ha ha ha.

  48. Re:ditto... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would certainly not post this in wikipedia. Taking anything patented apart and figuring out how it works violates the DMCA. The last thing we need is for good community based projects to be sued or shutdown.

  49. I followed the instructions and they worked. by Erris · · Score: 1
    From the article:

    Simple instructions, pop the bottom, press it in. Watch for the pink spot to turn white.

    You don't want to try it, I promise.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    1. Re:I followed the instructions and they worked. by Ravatar · · Score: 1

      Haha, I didn't even think of that until you mentione d it...

  50. Don't like it don't buy it. by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 0
    Personally, I think this is a retarded idea too, but I sure am glad that I live in a consumer society.

    By definition, if this "wasteful product" finds a market, it is not wasteful to the society that produces it. It becomes part of the economy. Every supplier in the supply chain, the manufacturer, delivery, marketing, and retailer all make their bit on it. And nobody is forcing the consumer to buy it.

    Just because I personally find no use for, say, dry cleaners, nail salons, or professional sports, so what? I just don't buy any of that stuff.

    The alternative to allowing any fool thing to be sold, historically doesn't pan out too well.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:Don't like it don't buy it. by dangitman · · Score: 1
      By definition, if this "wasteful product" finds a market, it is not wasteful to the society that produces it.

      "By definition"? That doesn't make any sense. Just because someone buys something, doesn't mean it is not wasteful, and not environmentally damaging. How is it not wasteful to be wasting energy and natural resources on this, which has little necessity, when we are running out of energy and resources to make things that can improve our society greatly, or cure diseases?

      It might make me happy to buy food and throw it in the garbage, but I'm still being wasteful.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:Don't like it don't buy it. by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Don't bother to discuss with a "free world" advocate... they just are not bright enough to see that what is freedom to themselves is damaging or wasteful for others.

      The environment, they just don't care about it. Their country's economy is more important to them, in their narrowminded view. Cowboy Bush is their man.

    3. Re:Don't like it don't buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who sees that drugs like cocaine or heroin are fitting this definition nicely, too? But, yay, someone took a step foreward and banned them. Same thing goes here... it isn't humans who are directly harmed by this, I admit, but our environment will suffer even more damages than any income someone could make could ever justify.

    4. Re:Don't like it don't buy it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing you're around to tell us all what to do, what we can and cannot make, what we can and cannot research.

      Can I drink some water, oh exalted pe1chl? Do tell me when I'm damaging you or being wasteful. You, typing on your fucking computer, enjoying the fruits of the very sort of society you claim to despise.

  51. Cost... by cobrabyte · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to USA Today, the retail price is around $2.25.

    -c

  52. Cooling by trekkie314 · · Score: 1

    I remember reading in a physics book 5 years ago that soda companies had developed a self-cooling can, using the same principles as this. When the pop top was opened, liquid CO2 was released from a previously sealed capsule, and in the process of evaporating, would cool the contents of the can to close to freezing. Obviously, this idea never made it to the market (as far as I know)

    So, when I saw a commercial touting the coffee technology as "revolutionary" I was somewhat surprised--not only is the chemistry behind it unoriginal, but some other company already had the same idea years ago...

    1. Re:Cooling by dbIII · · Score: 1
      would cool the contents of the can to close to freezing. Obviously, this idea never made it to the market
      Take a look at a drink can - it has a narrow top and a domed bottom to cut down on the amount of aluminium used and cut costs due to the sheer number of the things. Adding in another section to handle gas at a much higher pressure adds to the cost. It could be done, Guinness beer can be found in cans with a pressurised nitrogen compartment to get the right froth, but people will pay a lot more for that than for a cold can of carbonated sweet beverage. This sort of thing competes against vending machines and plastic boxes lined with polystyrene foam.
    2. Re:Cooling by JKR · · Score: 1

      CO2 is an odd substance; if you try to liquify it at normal pressures, it simply freezes. To make liquid CO2 you need to pressurize it. At the triple point you'd need 5 atm. of pressure, at -56 deg. C. Colder, you get solid "dry ice". Warmer, you need more pressure (equals increased wall thickness, cost, safety risk...). I think the can would end up being made of heavy grade aluminium for safety reasons.

      Jon.

    3. Re:Cooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In canada, Labatt is currently selling a self-cooling beer can...
      http://www.sceneandheard.ca/article.php?id=1182

      But as a beer drinker and coffee addicted, I would say that, in normal cans, I usually drink all the beer before it gets warm, as for the coffee that I finish before it gets cold...

      Thoses "new" devices doesn't impress me.

  53. Japan by ryanov · · Score: 1

    Japan has solved this problem a different way -- keeping the cans warm. When I was over there a month or two ago, I found that you could get a can of hot coffee almost anywhere -- even ancient temple grounds -- out of a nearby vending machine.

    "Santori BOSS is boss of them all since 1992."

  54. 145 degrees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow thats hot. I guess they must keep it under pressure since water boils at 100 degrees (at normal atmospheric pressure).

    Anyway I prefer my caffiene cold, is there any chance of them coming up with a self cooling pepsi or mountain dew?

  55. Pure Marketing BS... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    Just like when Ford claimed that it took 4 Billion Dollars to develop the Taurus in 1995 - pure bull. Exothermic devices are old hat. In Japan it is used to heat saki. The military use it to heat rations. Canadians use it to warm their hands in winter.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  56. 24 million New Taiwan Dollars maybe... by HermanAB · · Score: 1

    even then, that is way too much for a primary school science kit.

    --
    Oh well, what the hell...
  57. Rough science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Took them 10 years and 24 million to develop this? Mike Bullivant, from Rough Science, did basically the same in 2 days using a kiln, a hammer and a few plastic bags.

  58. Rev 1 by EvilMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

    This is so wasteful it honestly offends me
    This is actually the revised eco-friendly version; the original product trialled was suitcase-sized and contained an rip-cord triggered inflatable chef who would pour the coffee for you. You just know it's gotta be good coffee when the instructions contain the word "deploy".

  59. Really? by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    I always thought it was a poor substitute for the ultimate recipe, using an ibrik, perfected by the Turks in the 16th century.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Really? by Anubis350 · · Score: 1

      I agree completely.

      My family (on my mothers side) are sephardic jews from Turkey. We've been drinking turkish coffee for quite literally centuries and I grew up on the stuff. While I can enjoy other coffee, nothing is quite like properly prepared turkish coffee.

      As a side, I have some truly ancient ibriks in the house that date back several generations to my great-grandmother's exodus from Turkey (and were probably old before then), damn do those things last :-P.

      --
      "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  60. Cowboy Bebop by grimiore1 · · Score: 1

    This reminds of that Instant Ramen-cups in Cowboy Bebop. (I believe it was in the movie)...They just ripped a strip, and presto, instantaneous hot Ramen cups... Of course, everybody wasn't exactly thrilled with having to eat cheap instant Ramen.. It seems that even as technology gets more convient and cooler, low quality mass products will still taste the same.

    --
    Ben, you've become an UberGeek! Take me as your padawan!!!
  61. Re:ditto... by n0-0p · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I realize this is offtopic and will risk getting modded down, but why are you duping my post word for word an hour later? Is this karma theft instead of karma whoring? It actually seems to work because you got modded up and I got modded down "redundant."

    I assume that you just wait for a higher rated post to scroll off the first page and then repost at the top. I am curious on why you'd even bother though. Are you just trying to game the mods and see if they're paying attention? It seems like an odd hobby.

  62. Write out the unit of measurement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When using retarded medieval units of measurements, please write it out fully instead of just "degrees". You're confusing people who are used to a boiling point of a clean 100 degrees. Thank you.

  63. Soup would be much better then coffee. by John+Sokol · · Score: 1


    Soup would be much better then coffee.

    I mean I can drink cold coffee but nothing is as nice as hot soup.

    Anyhow this isn't the first time something like this has been tried. I remember The self heating MRE's for US Troops.

    http://www.allproducts.com/manufacture98/cncrafts/ product3.html

    http://www.heatermeals.com/heatermeals.html

    Some time back they had a self cooling soda can too.

    My favorate reaction for something like this is Ferric chloride on aluminum, It gets hot enough to ignite paper almost instantly. But very quickly neutralizes the reaction. This way traditional Aluminum can technology could be used, rather then something exotic. But maybe the whole things needs to be FDA approved and edable...

    --
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Soup would be much better then coffee. by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      Err, no. If you ate calcium oxide, it'd cook your guts.

      Besides that, I think it's something I put in my swimming pool; the bag has warnings about producing hydrogen when mixed with water. Anyone got a match? ^_^

  64. Altitude problems? by zetetikos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've tried these. They are not too great tasting, but handy. However I dragged some along on a camping trip in Colorado, thinking how great it would be to have hot coffee first thing in the morning. Well they don't seem to work at 9,000 feet above sea level. It was also about 60(f) degrees out. Didn't even get warm. Buzz kill - literally. They heat up OK in Denver - 5,000 feet - starting from room temperature. There is no warning about altitude issues on the containers that I could find, so maybe it was the starting temperature, but if it reaches 140 degrees from 70, I would think it would still become reasonably warm from 60.

    1. Re:Altitude problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That doesn't make any sense. The MRE heaters are unaffected by altitude or starting temperature (a specific requirement by the military).

      In fact, many MRE's are frozen and contain two of the heater packs. One to thaw the food and another to heat it.

      Maybe these coffee things are using a crappier chemical heater?

  65. That PDF is dumbBe warned by GoClick · · Score: 3, Informative

    Be warned that the previos poster's opinion is wrong and he's not entitled to it. The PDF isn't related and the other blogger isn't better.

    We don't have those fancy things in Canada as far as I know but I wouldn't buy em if we did. First of all it looks like you don't get very much coffee and second it looks expensive and third you're allways in driving distance of a Tim Hortons anyways.

    How often are you so far from a power source that you can't spend $10 and get a small coffee cup sized hotplate?

    Silly silly silly

    On the other hand if you could somehow drain the coffee and put a heat activated smoke bomb or something in there than they'd sell

    1. Re:That PDF is dumbBe warned by mithras+the+prophet · · Score: 1

      Whoa weird, you're right. Grandparent post, if not a troll, is remarkably bad.

      --
      four nine eighteen twenty-7 thirty-nine forty-7 fiftyeight sixty-nine seventy-9 eighty-8 one-hundred-and-nine one-twenty
    2. Re:That PDF is dumbBe warned by unitron · · Score: 1
      "Be warned that the previos poster's opinion is wrong and he's not entitled to it. The PDF isn't related and the other blogger isn't better."

      You have mis-understood the (to you) parent poster's attempt at humor. The PDF, which is about what makes web sites credible, is related to his remark that he finds the earlier blogger more credible because the photos are better (and they are). His assertion that the earlier blogger is more credible is arguably humorous because, good photos notwithstanding, the explanation given is that the coffee is heated up by annoyed demons.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  66. A self contained Nuclear Reactor more efficient? by ChrisMacAttack · · Score: 1

    One small step forward for convenience. One giant Leap backwards for energy efficency. Seriously though 8 ounces of mineral Calcium Oxide and enough packaging to kill several small African Tribes ('The God's Must be Crazy' anyone?). All this just to heat a single serving of your beverage of choice. It seems pretty clear why we havent seen such a simple product in our retail outlets before. Personally I think the merits of a more durable mutli use container with a self contained element (powered by electricity, butane etc.) outweigh the merits of this container 10 fold purely because of cost efficiency (let alone energy efficiency). I guess only time will tell us if it is commercial. How much are people really prepared to pay for convenience? I know I wouldn't want to be forking out for this stuff on a daily basis. On the plus side I doubt we'll have to wait long before some yank seriously injures themself not following directions and gets this pulled from the market.

  67. Best. Comment. Ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thanks!

  68. Pricing... by Otto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I have no idea how much these retail for, I'm sure that the price is inflated more by the "oh shiny" factor than production or development costs.

    Yeah, pretty much. A 4 pack sells for about $6. I found these in a grocery store a couple months back and picked up a 4 pack for the "oooh shiny" factor. The coffee was only so-so, of course, but it did deliver as promised. Coffee got properly hot.

    I too was struck by the weight and heft of the thing. I felt that it's be useful for camping trips because, if necessary, you could beat a puma to death with the damn thing. Way, way overbuilt. Very solid feel to it.

    I have not purchased them again, and likely will not except for possible camping purposes. The real question, for me, is where would one need this sort of device? At home, you have a microwave if you need to heat up a plastic tube of premade coffee, so the self-heating is redundant. Most workplaces have coffee makers for the employees which tend to be always full. In the car on the way to work, you could stop by a coffee house or fast foodery or something. It would be handy for being out in the wild, far from power and easily obtained coffee, but how often does that occur? People who go camping usually only go maybe once a year, and usually they are in RVs nowadays, with power and coffee making devices.

    It's basically a product without a large market.

    If the thing held soup, now, you'd have something. Lots of office worker types would likely keep several in their desks. Because while many offices have microwaves, and microwavable soups already exist, not having to get up to have some soup has an odd attraction to it.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Pricing... by beebware · · Score: 1

      I brought some of Nescafe's self-heating expresso cups around a year ago here in the UK - around 1 UKP per cup (if I remember correctly) - expensive, but still cheaper than airport waiting area coffee (and coffee on the train to the airport).

    2. Re:Pricing... by coolcold · · Score: 1

      probably campers or some other uses though it does sound like a solution in search of a problem :/

      --
      I am harvesting funny/good quotes. Please help by putting them in your sigs :)
  69. Re:ditto... by blincoln · · Score: 1

    I am curious on why you'd even bother though. Are you just trying to game the mods and see if they're paying attention? It seems like an odd hobby.

    Given the high UID, it's probably someone from one of the various 13-year-old-l33+-hax0r groups that collect karma-possessing accounts on Slashdot to modbomb with.

    --
    "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  70. not so new imho... by Ecio · · Score: 1

    http://www.caldocaldo.it/eng/index.html is available in Italy since years (the domain is registered in 2000) and it looks like it works using the same principle...and we have Coffee with Grappa too :D PS FYI "Caldo Caldo" means "hot hot" in italian :)

  71. Re:ditto... by name773 · · Score: 1

    and how did it take 10y and $24e6 to develop such a simple product?

  72. Re:Instantly hot! (on the contrary!) by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

    Easier to just use Hershies Kisses and some alcohol, or sometimes just a movie in a dark room . . . not that I intended things to work that way any of the times, that would be manipulative . . . luckily, I can honestly say that unitended things happen sometimes . . . ah, maybe the trick is not intending anything devious from the beginning? (Can I honestly say that, or am I lying to myself? hmmm....)

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  73. buy these heaters for $1 each by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    on Froogle you can find these kinds of heaters for $1 each or less in bulk
    looks good for post hurricane situations without power!

  74. Oblig Futurama by RipTides9x · · Score: 1

    It's nice and all but still doesn't hold a candle to the Self-Microwaving Bavarian Creme Dog.

    Bzz-Zowp!
    Mmmmmmmmmm...

  75. Re:ho hum... nothing new here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The military has been doing this for YEARS.
    MRE heaters.. No big deal.

    But you need on of those patented "Rock or
    Something"s.

  76. longbox by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    so much waste. reminds me of those long cardboard boxes they put around cd cases until the 90s because record stores didn't want to change their shelving. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Longbox not unlike those self-destructing dvds too. there seems to be no incentive to reduce packing waste. seems like the nicer the product, the more waste. if only most consumers weren't so easily dazzled, companies wouldn't spend so much money/materials on making stuff look nice on the shelf. companies should offer none fancy packaged versions. i'de get it even if they don't discount it, just to reduce some of the waste. maybe online retailing will change the "billboard on a shelf" strategy.

    1. Re:longbox by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Fixtures are a big cost to retailers. I deal with a company that bought a used bookstore on eBay, just for the fixtures. This was not a small cost, and certainly the longboxes helped speed the acceptance of CDs into the existing distribution channels. Once the volume of CDs hit critical mass, the longboxes disappeared and the fixtures were update to acommodate the new form factor. Heck some retailers used those silly long plastic containers after the longboxes were gone, just to put off the cost of updating their fixtures.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  77. Oh.. Oh... by The+Creator · · Score: 1

    Getting to finish the joke on slashdot = Priceless.

    --

    FRA: STFU GTFO
  78. well... why did it take so long to get ready ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they could have used a simple acid / base reaction to heat the stuff, which is exothermic too and doesn't require carbon oxydes or whatever ?

  79. Canned Heat by Sharefield · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This "new" thing is in the First World War was used by the English army to warming up their canned food.

  80. Why does the thought of using these for ... by 3seas · · Score: 1

    .... bombs.....come to mind?

    1. Re:Why does the thought of using these for ... by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      yes we should all fear the explosives that ignite at 145f

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    2. Re:Why does the thought of using these for ... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Well, it's just something else for the TSA to ban on airplanes.

      Imagine walking onto an airplane with a cup of Wolfgang Puck coffee and a 20oz Diet Coke. You drink the Diet Coke, fill up the plastic bottle with the heating reagent, screw the top on, and put it in the bathroom trash barrel. Three minutes later...

      National Security Incident - $4. OK, $6 at airport prices.

      Still, it's not as cheap as the guy who wrote about making a in-flight knife using superglue and cardboard strips.

      Actually it's a pretty good excuse to ban carry-on beverages so you have to buy the airplane soda for $3 per 6oz plastic cup of super-chlorinated ice. Gee, thanks, Wolfgang.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  81. Hot? Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody should already know that FOOD is supposed to be hot, and beverages should be cold - or is that just me?

    Anyway, over here, one can buy beer kegs which are self cooling from a number of breweries. Turns out, they are all using the same system called CoolKeg, which is fully recyclable and goes with a quite hefty deposit. In that system, they use some strongly hygrophilic agent on the outside (which gets warm), and water that evaporates and thereby cools the beverage around the beverage. To recycle, they take out the chemical, heat it so it "dries" again, replace the valve between the chemical and the water and refill the water and the beer.

  82. Re:Instantly hot! (on the contrary!) by q.kontinuum · · Score: 1

    ah, maybe the trick is not intending anything devious from the beginning? (Can I honestly say that, or am I lying to myself?

    I think, You have definitely a point here. When I was in relation ship, it often happened that I was just friendly (as in friendship, asexual!) to some girls, and it turned out they asked for far more. (I was lucky, my girlfriend that time was not a jealous type of person and allowed me to have some fun...)

    Than again, when I was single, it took a loooong time to find some adventure, probably because I wanted it too much.

    Of course, when I had a girlfriend, I was nevr actively looking for other girls or wishing for an adventure. (Can I honestly say that, or am I lying to myself? hmmm....)

    --
    Trolling is a art!
  83. MUCH more fun uses by Seng · · Score: 1

    I always enjoyed tearing off the cardboard, crumble the "stuff" into a 20-oz soda bottle. Add water, screw on cap, stand back ;)

    Sounds like a cannon going off when it lets go!

  84. Camping and self heating devices by technoextreme · · Score: 1

    Actually, I have used self heating devices before when I went camping. They are really good glove warmers.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  85. Re:ditto... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of the money went to research legal defences in case someone ignites one of these in their lap then sues.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  86. Re:ditto... by SunPin · · Score: 2, Funny

    This happened to me twice. That's why I don't post anything meaningful anymore if I post at all.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  87. Kaboom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "bomb / grenade" urge seems to be surfacing again and again... John Brunner dreamed this up in the mid-sixties.

    In "Stand on Zanzibar", saboteurs drain the contents of self-heating "Camp with Campbell's" soup cans and refill them with suitable explosives.

    I take this as a sign that it's time to re-read it. It seems like every time I do, several additional aspects of the cultural background in that book have crossed over into reality.

  88. 10 more years and 20+ more million... by layer3switch · · Score: 1

    call me when you spent 10 more years and 20+ more millions on instant ice coffe in a bottle because i'm still working on how to disolve sugar and milk after mixing hot coffee with cup full of ice.

    --
    "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
    1. Re:10 more years and 20+ more million... by Mad+Alchemist · · Score: 1

      Why not put the sugar and milk in before the ice? Even coffee shops should be okay with giving you a glass of ice and a cup of coffee.

    2. Re:10 more years and 20+ more million... by layer3switch · · Score: 1

      BRILIANT!

      why, instant cold/hot coffee in a bottle?

      BRILIANT!

      1. Spend 10 years and 24 millions to invent instant cold/hot coffee
      2. Find investers to spend another 24 millions on mass production and another 24 millions to pay off the previous debt
      3. ?
      4. Make Zillions of Dollars

      BRILIANT!

      You and me, Mad_Alchemist! We'll be going out on town and buy some fancy clothes and record players soon! Oh, I can't wait til those big city ladies check me out on my new flashy state-of-art polyester slacks and platform shoes!

      --
      "Don't let fools fool you. They are the clever ones."
  89. Drugs or War on Drugs - which is more wasteful by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    Same argument here. I don't do drugs, but my life is somewhat diminished by having them be illegal.

    I am of the opinion it would be far cheaper as a society to treat drug abusers, than it is to spend billions every year on jailing them, and indirectly encouraging all of the associated criminal activity and violence that goes with supplying the users.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  90. but does it.... by Tyten · · Score: 0

    Nice. but does it run on Linux?

  91. definition of waste by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1
    waste: To use, consume, spend, or expend thoughtlessly or carelessly [dictionary.com]

    So, if someone spends $24M and 10 years developing a stupid product, is that thoughtlessly or carelessly?

    If someone labors to earn some money to spend on said product, then consumes it, would they have done that without feeling they got some value?

    The problem is WHO gets to define what is "wrong".

    For example; I could completely dislike your taste in music, therefore every compact disc you own is a wasteful piece of plastic that will end up in a holy landfill somewhere, by my definition.

    Finally, I do buy food that I throw out all the time. I would be a big fat pig if I ate every french fry I ever bought. Is it wasteful? I dunno, everyone who grew the potatoes, transported them, turned them into french fries, cooked them and sold them to me thought they were making a reasonable profit on them. I thought it was a good value for my money - in fact I got TOO MANY with my "#4 lunch special". I ate what I wanted and tossed the rest. Then the garbage man gets paid to haul it away. Whee!

    If we lived in a society that regulated each step of that process... everyone would be worse off.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    1. Re:definition of waste by JetTredmont · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Finally, I do buy food that I throw out all the time. I would be a big fat pig if I ate every french fry I ever bought. Is it wasteful? I dunno, everyone who grew the potatoes, transported them, turned them into french fries, cooked them and sold them to me thought they were making a reasonable profit on them. I thought it was a good value for my money - in fact I got TOO MANY with my "#4 lunch special". I ate what I wanted and tossed the rest. Then the garbage man gets paid to haul it away. Whee!

      At which time it goes into a landfill and quite rapidly decomposes, providing fuel for the non-immediately-biodegradable substances to start decomposing.

      The "waste" is that this coffee cup goes into the same landfill, takes up about as much space as two super-size french fry orders, and yet last, oh, let's just estimate that it lasts about ten million times as long in said landfill.

      The PROBLEM here is that not all costs are passed on to the consumer OR to the provider. The cost of waste disposal is horrifically uncapitalized in the US, primarily because, aside from materials deemed "hazardous waste", there is no good way to regulate it. If waste management were properly capitalized, styrofoam cups would run for hundreds of dollars. But, it's not. You pay as much to throw out the styrofoam cup that rents landfill space on the order of eons as you do to throw out the serving of lasagna you left too long in the fridge, which will be gone from the landfill (as a discrete body of substance) in a matter of weeks.

      No matter how "free market driven" an economy is, it needs to understand where free markets fail. They OFTEN fail when public goods and services are needed to handle their byproducts, and this is a perfect example of that.

      In other words: yes, this is a horrendous waste of resources, and even though I do firmly believe in free market forces, I'd love for my government to step in and put a mandatory recycling program (vendor-funded) or heavy use tax on products such as this. Because it's not the producer who pays for this today, nor the consumer, nor the garbage man. It's your children and mine, who have to live in this filth.

    2. Re:definition of waste by Eric+S.+Smith · · Score: 1
      I ate what I wanted and tossed the rest. Then the garbage man gets paid to haul it away. Whee!

      And there's no such thing as pollution.

      More generally, as a point of interest, I must ask: if I were to pay you to hunt endangered species to extinction, or to destroy great works of art, would the commercial transaction render the whole business desirable?

  92. Insensitive clods by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    I only drink iced coffee!

  93. The beauty of patent law ... by JetTredmont · · Score: 1

    Yes, old idea. Even older than the Army's use (using an exothermic reaction to heat materials ... isn't that one of mankind's first inventions? And didn't he just kinda steal that idea from Nature?)

    However, never before has someone thought of using an exothermic reaction contained inside a coffee cup, for this very purpose. I mean, I thought of flicking a zippo lighter inside a cup of not-quite-hot-yet chocolate, but the flame just always seemed to go out. Mankind was dumbfounded. How to harness the power of fire in a small, nonreusable, container to heat a miniscule amount of liquid while simultaneously consuming a massive volume of shelf and landfill space? No one could figure out this riddle.

    Well, apparently, at least not until 1997. Now, here, eight years later, we are able to enjoy the fruits of their genius!

  94. Yes, soup and redundancy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    This whole thing is rather redundant..

    See video here: http://www.wpgourmetlattes.com/howitworks.wmv and it explains the process with a pretty marketing scheme attached to it.

  95. Prior art by Animats · · Score: 1
    Nescafe Hot was developed in 1995. It was test-marketed in the Midlands of the UK in 2001, but wasn't enormously successful. Priced at £1.16 for a small coffee, it was rejected by the market.

    Someone took apart a Nescafe Hot can, which is the same technology Puck has licensed.

    An earlier approach appears in the Japanese self-heating sake cans. It's the same calcium oxide/water reaction as the others, but the mechanism for setting it off is clunkier.

    The idea is old, but the trick was to develop a simple, reliable way to start the reaction. The Japanese sake cans required that the user push a big pointed pin through a hole in one end of the can. Early versions had the pin attached externally to the can; later versions integrated the pin into a plastic cover. Thermotic Developments worked out an improved triggering mechanism with no loose parts. That's a neat trick, since it has to be idiot-proof, survive dropped cans and cases, and be manufacturable at high speed at very low cost with a near zero defect rate.

    The next generation of the technology runs hotter and can do soup and small packaged meals.

  96. Re:ditto... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Um, no. Part of patenting something is telling everyone how it works. That's why patents are published.

    It is possible that someone might use the DMCA to try to protect something that is a trade secret (which otherwise might be patentable).

    Improper use of the DMCA makes baby Jesus cry.

  97. This is not new at all. by ciw42 · · Score: 1

    I remember as a kid at least 15 or so years ago, here in the UK there was a product called the "Hot Can" which was exactly the same as this, only it contained soup or if I remember rightly some rice-based thing.

    I think they were about £5 (GBP) each, they were sold in regular shops, and were somewhat of a disappointment, mainly because the food was pretty dull, not because they didn't work well. There was also a coffee version at least 10 years ago, I remember my younger brother buying a load of them when he went camping one year.

    The question therefore has to be, how the hell did it takes these guys 24 million and 10 years to develop what is to all intents and purposes the same thing? If I were to present you with a bicycle wheel and tell you it'd taken me 10 years to develop and that I'd spent 24 million doing so, you quite rightly laugh and point at me. Seems a surprise that no-one seems to be doing that to these guys.

  98. Re:ditto... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    That's like saying - When I drive, I don't use my turn signal to change lanes anymore because the last two times I did, the guy in the other land sped up to block me out.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  99. OT, Your Sig by the+phantom · · Score: 1

    Thank god someone agrees with me. I had thought that the rest of the world had gone nuts.

    1. Re:OT, Your Sig by evilviper · · Score: 1

      I've gotten quite a few replies like yours.

      I think the advertising blitz just has to wear off...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  100. Re:ditto... by Charles+W+Griswold · · Score: 1

    Taking anything patented apart and figuring out how it works violates the DMCA.

    Um, no. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act covers (wait for it . . .) digital copyrights. A self-heating coffee cup is neither digital nor copyrighted.
    --
    "Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber" -- Plato
  101. Re:ditto... by Fussen · · Score: 1

    Yeah that's something that really blows me away... Sure 10 years could happen.. but 24 Million clamshells? GEEZE! What are these inventors eating for lunch? Caviar??

  102. Re:ditto... by ThJ · · Score: 1

    Russian caviar, maybe. Regular caviar is cheap and you get it on tubes. School kids have it on their sandwitches in Norway. :P

  103. Re:ditto... by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    I don't use my turn signal to change lanes anymore because the last two times I did, the guy in the other land sped up to block me out.

    You're from Massachusetts too?

    There was a quote from a survey of MA drivers a few years ago, one college student rationalized her 'never signal' policy by saying, "Oh no, you don't ever want to use the blinker, that's like giving information to the enemy!"

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
  104. Only one thing to say.... by Chiisu · · Score: 1

    That's hot

  105. Coffee fresco by jsproul · · Score: 1

    The same exothermic chemical reaction used in this coffee cup is the basis for ancient Roman hydraulic cement, plaster for fresco painting, etc. CaO + H2O = Ca(HO)2 + O + heat. The materials are essentially recyclable, since the calcium hydroxide can be baked to release water vapor and reduce it back to calcium oxide. However, in reality all these cups will simply end up in a garbage dump somewhere.

  106. Self heating coffee? by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    Self heating coffee? I don't need no self-heating coffee... I may arrive at an unlikely circumstance where I'm nowhere close to a coffee shoppe, but I am never far away from my overclocked P4 laptop... just flip that baby over, plug the fan, put my coffee cup over the CPU, and in just a minute I have steaming hot coffee! With the added bonus of a slight burny-laptop aftertaste.
    Juan Valdez, eat your heart out!

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  107. Re:ditto... by SunPin · · Score: 1

    As a matter of fact...

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  108. Re:ditto... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone call the parent a wambulance.

  109. Re:ditto... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I found some things while digging through his user page:

    Really cheep karma whoreing.
    Some intersting journal enterys.

  110. Does it produce a gas? by cfeagans · · Score: 1

    I remember many a bored day in the field when I was a soldier, we would tear open the heaters that they started supplying in the MREs (around the late 80's early 90's) to make bombs. All you needed was a airtight container, a few MRE heaters, and a bit of water. Seal. Shake. Toss. Bang.

    Glass always worked the best since it didn't stretch like a 20 oz soda bottle would.

    Does the coffee cup have a way to release the gas? Or does it create such a slight reaction that it is able to contain it?

    I see a law suit waiting to happen... where can I buy a cup?

  111. Re:ditto... by Popcorn+Dave · · Score: 1

    You mean that lever isn't a place to hang your cell phone when you're not using it? What will they think of next?

  112. caldo caldo - W.Puck copied 5 years ago?? by avision · · Score: 1
    As was pointed out by dedioste in a comment in Italian on Makezine, they must have quite justifiably spent all that money and time in first class trips to Italy to stock up on Caldo-Caldo - a "similar" product that's been around for at least 5 years and is now even available in Caffè Corretto flavour - with added grappa. See http://www.caldocaldo.it/

    /.ers may also like to rush down to their local bookies to place bets on OnTech either...
    1. inventing a cold coffee version in another 10 years' and $25M's time. Look into the future here: http://www.caldocaldo.it/freddo/index.html
    2. soon being up in court against Nuova Bit srl
    1. Re:caldo caldo - W.Puck copied 5 years ago?? by avision · · Score: 1

      sorry, just seen this startling similarity had already been noted

  113. So... by zlogic · · Score: 1

    ...they've patented the CaO+H2O (don't remember the exact formula of calcium oxide) chemical reaction.
    Wait... I'll patent all reactions which create C2H5OH and sue every alcohol-making company out there.
    Nice invention though. Shame about the patent.

  114. link to TrueTech MRE Food Heater directions by inQ · · Score: 1