Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X Drives Grand Challenge Entry

Anonymous Coward writes "Apple technology drives a new fully-autonomous vehicle developed for a major U.S. competition. From the article: 'Team Banzai is one of just 40 teams selected from 118 entrants from around North America to have made it through to the semi-finals of the 2005 DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency) Grand Challenge.'"

152 comments

  1. I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...welcome our OS X-powered autonomous vehicle overlords.

  2. Must be a marvel of engineering... by Laivincolmo · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...with only a single pedal for both acceleration and braking...

    1. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by Suburbanpride · · Score: 4, Funny

      technicaly, there are three accelerators on a car the gas pedal provides positive acceleration, the brake provides negative acceleration and the steering wheel allwos for lateral acceleration.

      --
      sorry 'bout the mess...
    2. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think you missed the one butan joke

    3. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by HermanAB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really - Joysticks are rather common in aircraft and many moons ago GM built a Cadillac with a joystick as a test vehicle, but they found it too hard to control.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    4. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by iabervon · · Score: 1

      The Grand Challenge rules say that you put in the route on a map, and the vehicle has to drive itself there. Obviously, this is how any Mac car would have to work, so it's a perfect fit. Really, those cars with 2 buttons (or, worse, 3) and a wheel are just too complicated for users, and just lead to people making mistakes. With an iCar, on the other hand...

    5. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      Someone shoudl build a beowolf cluster of these.

    6. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by lakin · · Score: 1

      I dont remember many details, but a few years back Tomorrows World (cancelled bbc show on new technologies, science etc) showed a combined accelerator/brake pedal. As i recall, you tilted it down to accelerate, and pushed it in to brake. A quick google search has turned up this, which sounds pretty similar.

      --
      Paul
    7. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I admire your inverse smartness.

    8. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by FuturePastNow · · Score: 2

      That's all right, power users can plug in a two pedal brake/accelerator and it works just fine. The single pedal is so elderly drivers don't get confused.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    9. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "with only a single pedal for both acceleration and braking."

      Actually easy! -1 to -128 for braking, 1 to 127 for acceleration, 0 for coasting.

      We might have built cars that way if we had velcro on the feet, and could pull up as well as push down.

    10. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the clutch.

      *sound of gnashing gears*

      Oh well, whatever. . .

    11. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by it_flix · · Score: 1

      And how do you eject yourself out of the vehicle? drag yourself to the exhaust?

      --
      www.notesmax.com
    12. Re:Must be a marvel of engineering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg awful idea

  3. Fruit-flavoured Victory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ""Apple technology drives a new fully-autonomous vehicle developed for a major U.S. competition."

    Woo Hoo! Cars run on Apple juice.

    1. Re:Fruit-flavoured Victory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 usage of u after o

    2. Re:Fruit-flavoured Victory. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought it was RDF kool-aid.

  4. Alternative headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful



    Pentagon backed competition (DARPA) recruits American schoolchildren to design its next generation of automated killing machines

    funny how different words can chill the reality

    1. Re:Alternative headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "DARPA recruits school children to design next aid convoy equipment"

  5. Why did they choose Macs? by intmainvoid · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Unfortunately the article doesn't expand on why they chose Macs. It'd be interesting to know if that was just what they were familiar with, or if they choose it for some specific reason.

    It's not like they'd be making use of spotlight or having a dashboard widget drive the car!

    1. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by mrseigen · · Score: 2, Informative

      Judging from the site, they just really seem to like Macs. Either that, or there were a few sitting around after they kitted out the lab that nobody was using, so they did an "intradepartmental relocation" under cover of night.

    2. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably to stand out in some way. It's a gimmick and little else, as there is functionally (at least for something like this -- remember the desktop is irrelevant for this particular application) nothing you can do with OSX that you can't do with a free OS, like Linux or any of the BSDs. It'll give Apple fans more ammo to tout their platform and possibly get the team some recognition from Apple itself.

    3. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boo hoo apple usurped your linux :(

    4. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by edrams · · Score: 1

      It could be because it's a pretty solid system that they can be confident about. I definitely wouldn't run Windows. It could cause a crash in a most literal way.

    5. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I did think the same thing - I'm typing on a Mac and judging by your sig you like them too, but there are some places that you don't need ease of use or a solid interface. Having said that, three of the team are previous NeXT/Apple software developers - if it's what they know then there's a good chance they can code faster for OSX than Linux/BSD and they can also probably take advantage of some nice features either of the PowerPC architecture or of OSX itself.

    6. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by dcstimm · · Score: 1

      if you read the article you would see that they are NEXT developers and they worked for apple and NEXT.. gezz

    7. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      In addition,

      what OS were the other 39 vehicles using?

    8. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by WatertonMan · · Score: 1

      I suspect they coded in Obj-C which is a little more robust on the Mac. I know it is available for Linux. But not in a terribly elegant fashion.

    9. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just aching to know if Linux is on the track too, aren't you.

    10. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by tm2b · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In their place, the main reason I'd select it (beyond liking Mac OS X) would be hardware - Mac mini motherboards cheaply pack a lot of punch with very modest space and power demands while not leaving a lot of device driver issues to worry about.

      There's also support for some realtime features in Mac OS X, but Linux can do that too.

      --
      "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
    11. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

      yes...

      I'm not ashamed of my zealotry

    12. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by dourk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Automator. Like, duh!

      --
      Wake up.
    13. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This... is why you fail.

    14. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by azav · · Score: 1

      To quote/paraphrase John Carmack, "failure in brakes.dll." :]

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    15. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Objective C was available as an installable option in Linux back when I was running Slackware 3.4 in the mid 90's.

      I'm not sure why it would be more 'robust' on the Mac.

    16. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Then they should be running Darwin, and dispense with all the eyecandy and bloat, which inherently translates 'instability' in the real world.

    17. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I'm not sure why it would be more 'robust' on the Mac.

      Because large parts of the OS depend on it.

      Also a lot of the system APIs are Cocoa (aka Objective-C) APIs.

      If you want to develop in Objective-C, you will definitely want to use a Mac.

      Andreas
    18. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by huckleup · · Score: 1

      Though your post sounds like flamebait to me, I will begrudgingly respond...

      I imagine someone actually had to write some software to run the thing. That would make the development environment/desktop quite relevant.

    19. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by huckleup · · Score: 1

      sorry, I meant that for the parent post, not the 'boo hoo' post.

    20. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by ztirffritz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I read about this somewhere else. If I remember correctly, some of the key members of their team were NeXT developers so they know OS X pretty intimately. That would be the only reason to use OS X for this task, unless you were give financial assistance from Apple.

      --
      Why doesn't anything interesting happen when I have mod points?
    21. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by CptNerd · · Score: 1
      Then they should be running Darwin...
      Well, technically, they are running Darwin...

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    22. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      I can download isos of Darwin without visiting warez sites.

      What you claim is like saying that somebody running Windows 3.1 is just running MS-DOS.

    23. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by aneroid · · Score: 1
      probably so that if the car does do well (results aside), then they won't have to re-invent what they've already done when they want to expand on the idea ie. autonomous car testing, etc.
      It's not like they'd be making use of spotlight or having a dashboard widget drive the car!
      expand implies they might. design issues aside, speed and reliability would/should be the main reasons for choosing an OS. versatility and future integration would be "bigger picture" reasons that might also be part of the decision.

      while i personally would've gone with linux or a *nix, in a large enough group of evangelists u'll obviously find alternate and/or opposing views.

      being familiar with the inner workings of any system is another obvious reason (as stated before). the article mentions the lead guys' experiences with apple.

      it's cool that there are several OSes involved in the race but it's not a big deal that a particular team picked OS X (unless it was a company with conflicting interests; which is not the case here).
    24. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by andreyw · · Score: 1

      Actually his claim is much more valid than yours. Windows 3.1 provided system-level/"kernel" features that were not present in the MS-DOS "kernel" (cough) - like protected mode, the ability to run more than one program at the same time, a network stack, etc,

    25. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      From one of the developers, originally posted on clubtouareg.com

      "The software architecture is totally object-oriented. We're using Objective-C and Cocoa to write all custom software to parse the serial datastreams, process the information, and monitor the whole process.

      We have total tie-in to Touareg's CANbus and came up with algorithms to reverse-engineer the header codes. For example, we can plot in real-time (up to 100Hz) the independent rotation rate of each wheel and compare it the axle rotation rate and the GPS datastream (10 cm accuracy updated at 10Hz).

      The computers are task dedicated pre-processing machines which talk to each other using a wired network (race rules prohibit any kind of wireless - to prevent any remote control "cheating"). The computers are called Navigator, Tactician, and Driver.

      For debugging purposes we have a wireless router that sends all that information to our chase vehicle ('Lisa'). All that information, plus an "e-stop" switch is displayed on our custom"Dashboard" app.



      Lots of fun stuff. "

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
    26. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      boo hoo youre a mac whore. how's jobs' cock tasting these days, artfag?

    27. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by Thu25245 · · Score: 1

      Looking at their site, specifically the pictures they're using 3 Mac minis.

      Perhaps a small, power-efficient, and relatively inexpensive box provides some sort of advantage when deployed in a vehicle with limited available space and power?

      Nahh, couldn't be. These people are probably fashion-conscious snobs who want the right computer to go with their berets and expensive coffee. That's the only reason anyone would choose a Mac, right?

    28. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better than that smelly tramp Alan Cox's.

    29. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by CptNerd · · Score: 1

      Lemme 'splain.
      (pause)

      No, is too much, lemme sum up:

      You can run Darwin without running Mac OS X, but you can't run Mac OS X without running Darwin.

      So, to say they should be running Darwin instead of Mac OS X doesn't really make any sense.

      --
      By the taping of my glasses, something geeky this way passes
    30. Re:Why did they choose Macs? by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Well, then they should strip off all the candy-colored bloat and just run Darwin.

      Your characterization is actually improved, thank you, because it clearly delineates MacOS X as a needless parasite for the kind of work they're doing.

  6. Guffaw Guffaw by Lord+Marlborough · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's biggest advantage is that it gets to start off several years ahead of any windows machines... Ha Ha... hmmmmm :-(

    1. Re:Guffaw Guffaw by coolgeek · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. Clearly the biggest advantage is that your vehicle is less prone to collision.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
  7. Meanwhile... by Tiberius_Fel · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Linux car drove in a never-ending circle (infinite loop), the Solaris car barely got moving at speed, and the Windows car crashed into a tree... :P

    --
    Join the Empire! http://www.empirereborn.net/
    1. Re:Meanwhile... by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 2, Funny

      But don't forget linux does infinite loops in 5 seconds (according to Linus :)

      --
      ^_^
    2. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it's obviously the Mac car that drives in an infinite loop.

    3. Re:Meanwhile... by jjiizxr · · Score: 0

      Linux car could comprehend the man pages to start the vehicle.

      Windows car move about three feet, bought out the the entire terrain, and declared itself the winner.

      Tiger car decided that it was too pretty to race around the desert.

      Solaris car declared itself exctinct and jumped into the la brea tar pit.

      Vista car was too busy thinking of a new name for itself.

    4. Re:Meanwhile... by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Mac car puttered along at 5mph, but damn did it look pretty.

      The SCO car just clamped onto the back of the Linux car for the entire race.

      The Amiga car was a marvel of engineering, but fell into a ditch two miles in.

      And the Hurd car will be ready to race any day now. Really.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    5. Re:Meanwhile... by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Solaris car wound up going off the track and didn't stop till it reached India.

    6. Re:Meanwhile... by Seumas · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, the Linux car never left the start-line, because RMS stood in front of it and refused to move unless they started calling it the GNU/Linux car.

    7. Re:Meanwhile... by mpeg4codec · · Score: 1

      The BeOS car never made it to the race; it had been abandoned by its creators. However, in retrospect, it probably would have won.

  8. Which of the Tiger features are they using? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    My money's on Dashboard...

  9. Wow by jrockway · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I used to believe that slashdot didn't run slashvertisements, but now I know I'm wrong. How is this news for nerds? It's just "propaganda for apple". What would be news for nerds would be a profile of the competition and the non OS X entries. But no, all we get is an article about how good Apple is because some robot is run by their OS. Great.

    I'll also note that the same article has been on Apple's "start page" (the default site for Safari) for over a week.

    Staying on topic :), I don't see the point of running embedded systems with OS X. OS X is a nice OS because of the usability factor. But a control system doesn't need a shiny GUI and integration with your iPod. So I think FreeBSD or Linux might have been a better choice... what specific Aqua/Cocoa feature was used here?

    --
    My other car is first.
    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      > what specific Aqua/Cocoa feature was used here?

      OS X isn't just a nice environment for users, it's an awesome environment for many coders. If they're like the many coders who love xcode, then xcode may have been that aqua/cocoa feature used as a big part of the development process, rather an important part of the resulting product.

    2. Re:Wow by FLAGGR · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Funny that you people like you wouldn't say anything if the thing ran FreeBSD. Just because you don't run OSX, don't care about Apple or anything related, doesn't mean other people don't. I admit some of the /. Apple stories are crap, but this one is good. If you have a problem with Apple stories on /., go to your prefrences and turn 'em off. Slashdot wasn't made specifically for you. God I hate "How is this news for nerds?" posts. /.'s new slogan should be "News, and if you disagree then shut the fuck up because its free"

      OSX is more than Aqua. It's based of the BSD kernel, and you can run said kernel by itself, without Aqua. Why the hell would they include Aqua in the car? (Unless there somekind of embedded computer display or soemthing)

    3. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux doesn't have the monopoly on nerds, maggot. Some of us much prefer OS X. Apologies if this doesn't fit with how you want Slashdot to be.

    4. Re:Wow by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      ...a control system doesn't need a shiny GUI and integration with your iPod. So I think FreeBSD or Linux might have been a better choice...

      For an embedded RT system QNX would be the go.

    5. Re:Wow by MustardMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I agree that xcode is an awesome development environment, there's nothing to stop the designers from using xcode on their desktops, then compiling and running the code on another *nix on the embedded computers in the robot. You can use xcode without using any apple-specific extensions, and because it's mostly a frontend to existing GNU tools, it's very easy to write console apps that work on both platforms without any tweaking. I do a similar thing on a daily basis - tweak my code in xcode, then upload it to a linux cluster to crunch numbers.

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they just really liked mac minis too :)

    7. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe you're right. Who knows? I didn't RTFA, and from what you wrote I'm guessing you didn't either. If xcode really is as nice as you say, they could have run a story about how great xcode is and linked to some surveys proving that xcode makes developers code 25% faster and 106% more bug-free. Runing a cheerleading fluff piece about shiny cars with shiny apple computers inside is indefensible.

      Off topic, but does anyone know of a good alternative to slashdot? I gave up on kuro5hin months ago, and el reg has no equivilent comment system.

    8. Re:Wow by xenoandroid · · Score: 1

      So if the article replaced every instance of OS X with Linux and Apple with some distribution of your choice it suddenly becomes news for nerds instead of propaganda for Linux zealots.

      FreeBSD and Linux might not have been a better choice if say, the developers knew how to develop for Macs better or if there are some aspects of Darwin that lend themselves to the task. Maybe they wanted the benefits of having a tightly integrated system as a base so that they wouldn't have to worry about making a mistake in their configuration. Who knows, even if it's just because they're all Apple fans I wouldn't call it a poor choice.

    9. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run OSX and I couldn't care less about it being used to run a vehicle.

      Since "driving a vehicle" is not an included module on OSX Tiger, the headline should not be "OSX Drives [blah]." I'm sure the developers of the vehicle aren't happy that the operating system that they're using gets more press out of them building an autonomous car than they do for actually building it.

      And given the bloat of OSX, I would consider it an inappropriate choice relative to a stripped-down FreeBSD - the size of Mac Minis isn't even a factor given micro-ATX PC motherboards.

    10. Re:Wow by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Whoa, whoa, whoa. Nobody said anything about hating Apple. I made that post from my Powerbook running Tiger! (I've also never installed a *BSD; GNU/Linux is my thing...) I just want to know what the point of the article is... why is it so interesting that someone is using OS X to control a vehicle?

      It's based of the BSD kernel, and you can run said kernel by itself, without Aqua. Why the hell would they include Aqua in the car?

      Specifically, what does their version of BSD (darwin) do that a free BSD couldn't do? I mean, why bother with it? I don't see the point of using OS X unless it's on a desktop. (Actually their X serves are nice for a server, too...)

      --
      My other car is first.
    11. Re:Wow by aergern · · Score: 1

      It's the MACH kernel.. NOT FreeBSD's kernel.

      --
      Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
    12. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also after reading TFA, two of the main guys in the project are Apple or Ex Apple and NeXT developers. They're just using technology they know intimately well, no doubt.

    13. Re:Wow by J.+Random+Luser · · Score: 1
      The kernel has been hacked to death by Apple, so they call it xnu
      [-macinstein-:~] p% uname -a
      Darwin -Macinstein- 8.2.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.2.0: Fri Jun 24 17:46:54 PDT 2005; root:xnu-792.2.4.obj~3/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh powerpc
    14. Re:Wow by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      It's the MACH kernel..

      ...with a pile of BSD-derived code on top of it (i.e., xnu isn't just the Mach kernel, the name mach_kernel nonwithstanding; it also has a large chunk of BSD-derived code in the bsd directory).

    15. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw, poor baby. Must be tough to find that perfect place to bitch.

    16. Re:Wow by jrockway · · Score: 1

      It's BSD running on the Mach microkernel. Just like MkLinux was Linux running on the Mach microkernel.

      --
      My other car is first.
    17. Re:Wow by Ed_Moyse · · Score: 1

      Genuinely not trolling, but don't you find the XCode editor a bit pants? Kate/Kdevelop seem so much nicer to me (though this is what I started with, and I'm only just learning XCode now).

  10. An obvious choice by civman2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    If I were designed a car, I'd want to be sure it had a dashboard too!

    And since it's autonomous, it doesn't need any Windows!

    1. Re:An obvious choice by ndansmith · · Score: 1

      For the record, I made this joke in an email to my friend Nate on Friday of last week, so I think I deserve some Funny mods as well.

  11. So when's this getting released? by EggyToast · · Score: 1
    I'd imagine an iCar would be quite popular among all those people hacking their car's computers, be they prius owners or otherwise.

    Heck, the G5 already looks like it could be substituted out for various engine parts, or at least fit in with most modern "blocks" under the hood.

  12. umm..... by dotspeaks · · Score: 0

    why didnt they see, what they can do using linux? :\ beats me.

    1. Re:umm..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they wanted to be taken seriously.

  13. Very cool, more information.. by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 4, Informative

    There's more information from Team Banzai on 'Dora' the self-driving touareg at their official website, including pictures of the three mini macs & networking hardware that drive the car. Considering some of the other competitors are entering in Hummer H1's, their choice of a relatively sane offroader (VW Touareg) could be very interesting. There are also interesting technical discussions over on the Club Touareg forums.

    1. Re:Very cool, more information.. by Baricom · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. TFA says they're Power Mac G5s. Do they have Power Macs also, or did somebody screw up (hopefully, not the team)?

    2. Re:Very cool, more information.. by Buran · · Score: 2, Informative

      vwvortex.com has more info, too. I heard of this there first.

      I, Touareg, indeed ...

  14. Hmm... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Does Microsoft plan to enter a vehicle running Windows Vista? I wouldn't mistake the red on the windshield for a Red Screen Of Death (RSOD). It just might be a Mac user who got splattered. :P

  15. Out of the way by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

    Lets just get it out of the way- Of course they didn't use windows- then it would have crashed...
    Anyhow, I remember back in the day when the LOGO turtle was the height of tech- and we would do little programs on Apples also.
    Does the DARPA entry have an iPod adapter?

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
  16. volksapple by pintomp3 · · Score: 1

    i've wondered what the link between apple and volkswagen is. their ads have a similar feel. the ipod and beetle were paired. osx on a toureg. anyone care to shed some light?

    1. Re:volksapple by damsa · · Score: 1
      Some people have this perception that Volkswagen are "gay" cars. In that the owners of the cars are gay. Not necessarily the car itself.

      Apple used to have a rainbow logo. So, no I can't really shed any light on this.

    2. Re:volksapple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apple likes to team up with VW cause they are seen as quality "hip" products(like macs).

      VW is like apple in that they both try to screw people into buying their products by making them look pretty. VW went to shit after about 1996.

  17. publicity stunt by rnx · · Score: 1

    that's all it is if you ask me.
    can't imagine the OS used playing any role in such a setting.
    don't think the autonomous vehicle needs e.g. the
    new "strong desktop search tool"

    1. Re:publicity stunt by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      if you read the article you insensitive clod, you would see these were former NEXT programers. i cant imagine why they choose OS X, other than it is based on Next.

      oh, but because they used the programing environment they preferred long before it became Apples, its a Stunt.

      If it OSX wasn't Next, and they still choose next, you would probably be saying, pretty neat.

    2. Re:publicity stunt by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      They need it to search the HD for the map incase they get lost.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    3. Re:publicity stunt by rnx · · Score: 1

      i read the article (not that there was much to read) and noticed the Next link as well.
      no problem with them using what they know.
      it's a publicity stunt because their OS selection is sold as exciting news without any clue as to what special role OSX actually plays.
      It's just a general purpose OS ... their software probably could run pretty much anywhere.

  18. In other news... by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In other news, 39 out of 40 Grand Challenge Entries not OSX driven.

    I love OSX and everything, but this isn't exactly something to be proud of.

    1. Re:In other news... by jjiizxr · · Score: 0

      CosmeticLobotamy said: I love OSX and everything, but this isn't exactly something to be proud of. ------ Wouldn't you just say "I love everything"? bit redundant to say "I love OSX and everything", isn't it?

    2. Re:In other news... by sokoban · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, they have a better market share among Grand Challenge entries than they do on the desktop.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    3. Re:In other news... by Kafka_Canada · · Score: 1

      Right.. but it's Zonk. Sort of like the BSD troll, but with editing privileges.

      (And, of course, "Apple rulez1!!!" posts instead of BSD is dead posts.)

      --
      Fuck it
    4. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, Apple has 2.5 percent of this market too.

    5. Re:In other news... by legolas_a20 · · Score: 1

      Those were my thoughts too. Esp. since the other 118 entries also don't seem to run osx. And I'm guessing most of them use a pc laptop. Which brings me to... power. How long before the g5 drains whatever batteries they put in there 1 minute? 2?

  19. Buckaroo! by invisigoth · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dr. Lizardo surrenders.

    IMDB

    1. Re:Buckaroo! by Pampusik · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that the Oscillation Overthruster is behind OSX? I've always had my suspicions...

  20. The reason they chose OSX.. by rylin · · Score: 1

    The reason for chosing OSX is pretty simple.
    If you're going to crash, you get a rather soothing message on your windshield, saying something went wrong.

    On the plus side, if you're running with classic mode enabled, you also get a sadface prior to when all hell breaks loose.

    1. Re:The reason they chose OSX.. by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a soothing message would help the driver of this vehicle a lot.

      Did I mention this vehicle is autonomous?

  21. Mac OS X is FreeBSD, most of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    qwack

  22. if they win ... by ta+ma+de · · Score: 1

    IRAQ (AP) - MacMini driven HUMVEE, armed with .50 Cal machine gun, jump starts apple's new switcher campaign. Female insurgent, Ahbudla Muhamda 22, says, "The thing just works, I was on the PC and it was like beep, beep, beep, beep, then bam, like from no where this thing, like, obliterates my Dell with, like a, storm of bullets. I switched and fast." Terrorists, according to local reports, are scared shitless and rumors suggest the whole insurgency is being hamstrung without computers.

  23. No problem... by Infinityis · · Score: 1

    Good thing this vehicle is autonomous. Otherwise they would want to equip it with an Apple escapePod.

    1. Re:No problem... by Tanmi-Daiow · · Score: 1

      maybe you mean Apple iScapePod

      --
      "Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive." - C.S. Lewis
  24. idiotic propaganda by autopr0n · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Okay, so one of the machines uses OSX. What do the others use? If this machine had won, it would be a diffrent story, but here all we see is that it one particular machine runs OSX. Who cares? God slashdot sucks these days.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:idiotic propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story, shockingly enough, brought to you by Zonk. Could somebody please fire that guy already? Is he fucking Taco, or what?

    2. Re:idiotic propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is he fucking Taco, or what?" Probably. He seems to like Macs, and we all know what that means.

  25. Grand Challenge is one of the few events... by vertinox · · Score: 1

    ...I'm actually following these days (next to the Space Shuttle).

    So is there any place I can place my bets on which team is going to win?

    I'd bet on Team Red over the OS X but only because they have two entries ;)

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  26. And this is news because by PinkX · · Score: 0, Troll

    A car of such kind running Linux isn't news anymore, in the sense that it's expected to do so, we've already seen Linux running on all kind of cars and many devices before that its use is seen as normal and almost isn't worth noting anymore, ie. it's what we are all used to see.

    A car running Windows wouldn't be news but a joke, be it Windows ME/CE/.not/mobile/xp/vista/whatever.

    I don't know the real technology behind the 'Powered by OS X' of the car, if it's using some OS X-only tools or anything like that.

    1. Re:And this is news because by SA+Stevens · · Score: 1

      It's a newsworthy novelty, like if one of the cars was 'Powered by OS/2' or something.

      Really, more of a NASCAR sort of thing, like the big logos all over the place.

  27. If it were using OS 9 Re:Must be a marvel... by aergern · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Moron.

    --
    Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
  28. Dupe? by kc0re · · Score: 1

    Dupe.

  29. Automator! by robolemon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course they built an autonomous vehicle with Mac OS X! It has Automator! Just drag and drop the Chess AI engine onto a car and you should be good to go!

    All this talk of coding, and they didn't even need to do any!

    Silly slashdotters!

    --

    I design user interfaces for a free network management application,

    1. Re:Automator! by lpangelrob · · Score: 1

      Would the Chess AI engine be driven by a Bayesian filter?

  30. god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    god this story has been beat to death. Get over it already. CHRIST.

  31. Let the movie jokes roll! by Diordna · · Score: 1

    And now for a collection of movie references:
    ---
    Laugh while you can, OS X-bashing monkey boys!
    ---
    Where are they going?

    THE DARPA GRAND CHALLENGE!

    When?

    REAL SOON!!!
    ---
    Which member is Pecos? Or is Pecos still in Tibet?
    ---
    Maybe it'll get to its destination by traveling *through* the obstacles!
    ---
    I'm sure that at at least one point in the building process, someone said "No no no, don't tug on that, you never know what it might be attached to!"
    ---
    Does the computer driving the car wear a ninja headband?


    Sorry if those were all horrible...I tried.

  32. Why the focus on OS? by puusism · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't see why the operating system is relevant for design like this. As far as this challenge goes, the innovation is in the application which drives the vehicle, not in the operating system. I believe that any modern OS would be stable enough and offer the relevant services (real-time scheduling etc.) for such an application. The same applies for coding environment mentioned in the article: there isn't an IDE or design model for OS X which is qualitatively better than an IDE or design model for any other major OS -- these things are OS-independent. Actually, the whole article (and the way it was posted) seems to be just a marketing plug for Apple. "See, OS X can drive a car!"

    --
    - Ismo
  33. What's the big deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    What's the big deal? I'm sure some vehicles are powered by Linux and some by Windows, but there aren't any articles saying "Wow! robotic cars powered by windows!".

    Sounds like it's just another stupid PR campaign by Apple to try to convince people that Apple is on the edge of technology when if you look into it, the other OS's have been doing it for a while.

  34. And the most amazing thing is... by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 2, Funny


    The most amazing thing is that they did it all in Interface Builder without any code.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  35. If one had System 9... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is way off topic, but what would happen when it crash-restarts and you hear that startup tone? That could be fun!

  36. Maybe... by Mechcozmo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was because the 3 Minis use ~60W of power each? Also, the Minis are really light. Weight and power-savings might have influenced their decision.

    1. Re:Maybe... by chibimagic · · Score: 1

      If, like someone else mentioned, people are entering Hummers in the contest, I doubt the weight was much of a deciding factor. They could have just as easily gone with G5 towers, and those things are 44.4 pounds without extra ram/hd/etc. And considering that some people install 500 watt speakers in their cars, I don't think the low power consumption was that much of a factor either. Most likely it was just because the people that designed it worked for NeXT, so they were comfortable with the coding environment.

  37. And one of the entrants uses... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...Kleenex to wipe the oil off their hands after working on their car. That's not newsworthy either.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  38. I can see it now . . . by Yeechang+Lee · · Score: 1

    Announcer: . . . And at the 46-mile marker, Team Banzai has pulled ahead! Team Banzai has just passed Team Caltech to take the lead in the DARPA Grand Challenge! Look at it go!

    [...]

    Wait, what happening? Ladies and gentlemen, the Team Banzai car has suddenly frozen up. And it looks like there's a rainbow-colored wheel spinning above it!

  39. They exist. by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Informative

    [Must be a marvel of engineering...] ...with only a single pedal for both acceleration and braking...

    There's an amusement park in my area with these.

    They are small cars (look a little like miniture Model-T's, I think they use go cart engies in them). Anyway, there's a course of a half mile or so where the cars run on a rail with limited manuveability (one rail down the middle of track, gliders on the left and right underside edge of the car to keep it from completely leaving the track). The cars only have one pedal. You push down to accelate (not a high range of speed, this is a kiddie ride), and when you take your foot completely off the gas a brake applies.

  40. Frameworks by jscotta44 · · Score: 1

    Because of the new and ever improving (arguably) frameworks that come with the most recent versions of OS X. Not to mention the IDE (Xcode). It is just a nice, out of the box package for doing development. It doesn't have to mean that. But it does.

  41. Depends by jscotta44 · · Score: 1

    Since they have to analyze a lot of data, maybe using the AltiVec engine in the PPC and/or the additional processing made available using Core Image frameworks (for processing images gathered by radar, laser, GPS, etc. made their work easier, cheaper, faster, etc. If they start out with a base Linux or BSD install, those frameworks are not available. Believe it or not, there is much more to OS X than just a pretty interface.

  42. OS X? by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    I've thought it was iPod Shuffle.

  43. Good thing they're not using an Intel Mac yet.. by core · · Score: 1

    They would have to have another autonomous vehicle attached to this one to carry the batteries :) (allright, I'll go out now)

    Ball matching frenzy for MacOS X: http://www.funpause.com/atlantis/

  44. Slashdot fails again by Legodude522 · · Score: 0

    Old news my friends. Someone better get the Apple RSS feed.

    --
    Because I have low karma, I need pills.
  45. Linux Drives Grand Challenge Entry by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

    Posted by Hisham on 23:11 Saturday 23 July 2005
    from the penguins-for-brains dept.
    Anonymous Coward writes "Linux technology drives a new fully-autonomous vehicle developed for a major U.S. competition. From the article: 'While enterprise and desktop discussions grab headlines, Linux is quietly infiltrating into much more mundane applications -- such as running the on-board computers of the University of Central Florida's entry for the DARPA Grand Challenge autonomous, unmanned vehicle competition. Prof. Kien Hua of the College of Engineering and Computer Science heads up the UCF program as team leader.'"

    (Straight from the Bizarro World, where /. is still a Linux-oriented website.)

  46. But serious... by tgv · · Score: 1

    Saying OSX powers this vehicle is about the same as saying that the NASA canteen in Houston powers the Space Shuttle. It's nice to see that a relatively prestigious project runs on OSX, but OSX doesn't make any real contribution to the task at hand. Or did I miss something in Tiger's 200 new features?

  47. Objective C by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    As has been noted elsewhere, Objective C is a little more difficult to set up on Linux or BSD, and somewhat less functional.

    And, as noted in TFriendlyA, they are using Objective C rather extensively.

  48. Objective C by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    in case you haven't picked that up elsewhere, yet.

    Perhaps they are also using Remote Desktop (or whatever that is) to make monitoring more, er, intuitive? The remote would not be a determing feature, but the integration with Objective C would.

    And I'm wondering about the lack of OS 9 jokes.

  49. So why no puns by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    about OS-9?

    Maybe I just haven't read far enough yet.

  50. I'm surprised. by Joseph_Daniel_Zukige · · Score: 1

    A few comments on the Objective C angle and a lot of complaints that the OS shouldn't matter by people who apparently missed the Objective C angle or perhaps assume that the GNU support for Objective C is equal to the Darwin/Cocoa support for Objective C.

    And nobody seems to be reaching for jokes about Microware's (Radisys) OS-9.

    Maybe Microware should have tried harder to defend their trademark after all.

  51. Just wait till it's out in BFE... by a+gash · · Score: 1

    and it won't compile anything untill it downloads the 750 meg develoeper tools package. Fire up the airport!

  52. G5 minis? by gr0k · · Score: 1

    The article says "Power Mac G5s running OS X inside the car"... yet the pictures on the website show that it is actually controlled by 3 Mac Minis. Since when do they make G5 minis? :)

    --
    http://evoketv.com - TV Listings 2.0
  53. BTW by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

    I did submit this, and it was rejected.

  54. actually... by circusboy · · Score: 1

    drove a forklift once that had just that. very weird experience...

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
  55. That's fantastic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the other entries running?

  56. Hmmm... by Blue+Lozenge · · Score: 1

    That autonomous vehicle seems snappier than the rest!