Slashdot Mirror


Your Homework is Play Video Games

GuitarNeophyte writes "Four schools in the UK will be testing a new program idea to use video games for educational use. An IT researcher, along with Electronic Arts (the software game giant) are funding the proposition. 'We're looking at developing some of the softer skills that are needed for the 21st century, such as problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration.' "

331 comments

  1. Ew... by ZakuSage · · Score: 5, Funny

    They have to play EA games? Wow, I feel sorry for them.

    1. Re:Ew... by ucahg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey, at least the summary was kind enough to clarify that he meant Electronic Arts the game giant, and not Electronic Arts the chimney sweep.

    2. Re:Ew... by southpolesammy · · Score: 2, Funny

      "No Johnny, you can't go outside and play. You've only put in 10 hours of homework today, and you haven't made your weekly quota of 110 hours yet."

      "But Mom, it's Sunday!"

      "Do you want to let us down? Now go back and don't come out until you've put in another 5 hours, and maybe we'll let you watch TV for a couple minutes before bedtime."

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    3. Re:Ew... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 5, Funny

      Playing EA games they will learn important business skills , such as :

      1:) milking a franchise for all its worth

      2:)Maximising your profits by removing such silliness as overtime wages and workers rights

      3:) how to count (One sequel , two sequels ....... fifteen sequels )

      4:) how to rush things to market to upstage your opposition

      5:) how to cover up #4 with marketing

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:Ew... by xtracto · · Score: 0, Redundant

      And note that they are not any games thy are EA games... indeed poor kids... they will get into the 28 hour/days :)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    5. Re:Ew... by Gleng · · Score: 2, Funny

      At least they'll learn how to Challenge Everything.

      --
      "Proudly Posting Without Reading The Article"
    6. Re:Ew... by BlizzyMadden · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, especially if they give you 90 hours of homework per week!

    7. Re:Ew... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 2, Funny

      What I'm worried about is the game programmers mentioning "persistence". To them, that just means the ability to save your game.

    8. Re:Ew... by EasyComputer · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      How many weeks in a light year?

      52!! Hahahaha,

      What do I win?

      Huh? What do you mean I win nothing?

      Do I at least get the respect of my peers?

      You mean I just get ridiculed for thinking I'm cool for answering such an easy question?!! Damn Slashdot!!

    9. Re:Ew... by CableModemSniper · · Score: 2, Funny

      And of course the absolutely vital fact that, if its in the game, its in the game.

      --
      Why not fork?
    10. Re:Ew... by Elias+Ross · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Am I the only one who remembered EA back in the C=64 days, when they truly were the maker/publisher of innovative video games? Classics such as Archon, Mail Order Monsters, Racing Destruction Set, Modem Wars, Wasteland, etc.

    11. Re:Ew... by Choad+Namath · · Score: 1

      Yeah, cause the Battlefield franchise totally bombed...

    12. Re:Ew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The company that created Battlefield wasn't owned by EA until well into the developement of the sequal(s) to Battlefield. So they weren't developed under the conditions you'd think of when you think of EA, and your point is bogus :P

    13. Re:Ew... by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1
      No, your not, many people do, but they like to dissociate the old Electronic Arts, when they had that cool logo, and still called themselves by thier full name, from the current entity called EA with the stupid logo, kinda like how people like Micheal Jackson when he was black, but not now hes white and a kiddie fiddler. Thus, Thriller = black Jackson = good, Earth Song = white plastic Jackson = bad.

      It's ok to like Black Jackson but not White Jackson, and it's ok to like Electronic Arts (cool logo), but not EA (suck logo).

    14. Re:Ew... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      "We can easily get another son, you know..."

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    15. Re:Ew... by lgw · · Score: 1

      Heck, I still play those games on my C64 emulator from time to time, as they're better than EA's current offerings!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    16. Re:Ew... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      But will they use this approach in special schools, where Everything is Challenged?

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    17. Re:Ew... by sukotto · · Score: 1

      More like Valve.

      "problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration" sounds like counterstrike to me.

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    18. Re:Ew... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      If we're lucky they'll hire Rockstar for the Sexual Education units!

    19. Re:Ew... by GoldAnt · · Score: 0

      Wow.. im so glad im almost done with school. The idea of having to play some cheezy game for credit sounds worse than listening to some ill educated teacher drone on.

    20. Re:Ew... by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Archon and Mail Order Monsters were the bomb. Sooo much fun.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    21. Re:Ew... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that's most software houses. Just try and start a campaign on /. to boycott computer games. That's like starting a campaign to outlaw the use of fishing rods at a fisherman's convention.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    22. Re:Ew... by jftitan · · Score: 1

      Though this is a really late response... this should be an easy solution. Back in the day, I never wanted to do my assignments, because it was called homework... Now, my kids will never play games, because its called homework. For the love of doG, please rename homework to... gaming... "Look kids... your gaming, all these pages of math... its not homework, its a game..."

      --
      "Don't Forget to Salt the Fries"
  2. I suppose that's possible by Alcimedes · · Score: 3, Funny

    IIRC, Doom had a lot of very graphic anatomy lessons built in.

    1. Re:I suppose that's possible by deadmantyping · · Score: 1, Redundant

      yeah and they could use GTA:SA as sex education

    2. Re:I suppose that's possible by Shads · · Score: 4, Funny

      Look at the bright side, parents and kids can agree on what makes them go on suicidal rampages-- homework. :P

      --
      Shadus
  3. I beleive this to be the future of education by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IMO, it is vital to make homework not feel like homework in order to get children interested in their schooling again and combat their growing apathy.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    1. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by ryanov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't really get it though. My parents told me "listen, quit the fucking apathy and do your homework." If I didn't, I was sorry (no, they didn't beat me up, but they punished me, y'know... like parents). I'm not really sure why grade school kids get to decide whether they wanna do work or not these days.

    2. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by gr8_phk · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "IMO, it is vital to make homework not feel like homework in order to get children interested"

      Sure, but rather than have them PLAY video games, have the MAKE video games. Yes, you can start that in elementary school - I did, and so did every other kid lucky enough to have a computer prior to 1980 - the masses were getting ATARI though. Besides, you don't need to pay EA to make games: Python and PyGame - now get started.

    3. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by hungrygrue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ummm no. If it is necessary to keep the brats entertained at all times and constantly stimulated in order to get their attention, then there is a serious problem. The correct response is to not allow them to have their toys and games at all if they can't be bothered to come out of their fantasy world and do some work.

      Pandering to them and trying to keep them interested because they have the attention spans of fruit flies will only make the problem worse. It is the kids that need to change, not the entire world in which they live. If little Johnny can't be bothered to do his Math homework because it's not as fun as playing Quake, then little Johny should get teh $#!+ beat out of him until he decides that maybe he SHOULD do his work. His math teacher should not have to wear a clown nose, dance a jig, and assign video games for homework just to keep him awake.

    4. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by mrRay720 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How very true.

      But then since you can seemingly get branded a child-hating monster of a bad parent nowadays by even looking at your child in a disaproving manner while they rape and old woman... this isn't really surprising.

      Children nowadays are given more and more freedom and less and less resonsponsibilites. You can get away with pretty much anything short of murder if you're under 16. What are parents getting in return in order to combat this? Well they're told that it's not their responsibility, and this is reinforced over and over. For those that realise that this is completely stupid and dare actually try and rase their child sensibly, they're attacked for doing so.

      Homework is just a tiny fraction of the overall problem here.

    5. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I find that children respond better to positive reinforcement and supportive counselling than savage beatings. What is this, 1920?

      YMMV..

      --
      I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
    6. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by tourvil · · Score: 2, Funny
      IMO, it is vital to make homework not feel like homework in order to get children interested in their schooling again and combat their growing apathy.

      You know, I'd love to help eliminate the growing apathy problem, but... meh...

    7. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The idea here is to make homework more engaging. Even though the term "video game" is being bandied about, what they're really talking about is "computer simulation." This technology will make it easier to introduce the concept of *case studies* to kids at an earlier age. As anyone who went to college knows, the best way to learn something is by doing case studies.

      When I was in grade school and high school, we just did pages full of math problems, with no real explanation of what use they are. While I still think that is necessary just to build up practice, I would have appreciated going to the next level and learning how some of those concepts actually applied to real life. As a result, there is a lot of stuff I learned in algebra and trig that I have simply forgotten over the years because I never had a chance to apply it to a real life situation, albeit a simulated one.

    8. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      IMO, these magical "soft skills" are learned by interacting with one's classmates on a daily basis, not combating child apathy. Child apathy is due to the morons teaching them poorly, and overcrowding problems in schools - not their lack of entertainment in school. I enjoyed learning like many of my classmates the smaller the class was because we interacted with the teachers more, not because the teachers were necessarily "entertaining."

    9. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Children, until trained to act and communicate like a grown human, are simply small, human-looking animals. Pain is the most effective and simple way to let someone know "hey, you fucked up!"

    10. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Washizu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I find that children respond better to positive reinforcement and supportive counselling than savage beatings."

      Especially when savage beatings are the next step when positive reinforcement fails.

      --
      OddManIn: A Game of guns and game theory.
    11. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Andrewkov · · Score: 1
      I find that children respond better to positive reinforcement and supportive counselling than savage beatings.

      But which gives the teacher more job satisfaction?

    12. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by LDoggg_ · · Score: 1

      I think its fine but only if it used in addition to written homework.
       
      As far a real world application, isn't that what the word problems are for?

      --

      "If they have both, tell them we use Linux. And if they have that, tell them the computers are down." -Dave Chapelle
    13. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by mnemonic_ · · Score: 1

      ellipsis with only two full stops
      lol errors

    14. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Shotgun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IMO, it is vital to make homework not feel like homework in order to get children interested in their schooling again and combat their growing apathy.

      Bullocks. How will you make the hamburger-flipping jobs they get after graduation not feel like hamburger-flipping? Will EA create a hamburger-flipping game to make minimum wage exciting. This is nothing but a total abdication of responsibility by the teacher organizations.

      People need to get it through their thick skulls that success depends not on what happens to a person, but how they react to it. Apathy doesn't come from the homework being boring. It comes from the lack of a connection between the work and the real world. Teaching is the art/science of helping students make that connection, and then standing back while the student does the rest. Once the children discover that the games are pointless, the apathy will be just as deep. Except now we'll be further along the path of convincing ourselves that it is the world, not ourselves, that is screwed up, and that everything would be more exciting if we could just change the color of the virtual armor to make life not feel like work.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    15. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by neildiamond · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, kids don't have more freedom. When I was a kid my parents let me walk all over the neighborhood and explore. I can't image that hapenning today. Video games just make a good babysitter and help us get fat. That's about it.

    16. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by coflow · · Score: 1

      "As anyone who went to college knows, the best way to learn something is by doing case studies."

      Is this really something that anyone who went to college knows? I know the professors seem to think so.

      I found the best part of my college experience to be the "old-fashioned" part, where the professor lectured us and we took notes and were encouraged to study further on our own. That gave me a conceptual foundation. The case studies we were given (and there were plenty of them) were generally useless generalizations that did not factor in the millions of variables that real life presents us. I hope that the "video game" approach gives a better approximation of reality, because I do think in theory case studies are a good idea (when used as a followup to a conceptual overview). I just found the case studies that I encountered to be too much fluff and not enough stuff.

    17. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 2

      How many children do you have?

      What are their ages?

      Thanks.

    18. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      resonsponsibilites

      Sounds like the beatings your parents doled out gave you a stutter. Well, now I know how *not* to parent.

    19. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1
      You know, I'd love to help eliminate the growing apathy problem, but... meh...

      Give me apathy, or give me something else!

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    20. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by kniLnamiJ-neB · · Score: 1

      Dork. It's

      "Give me ambiguity, or give me something else!".

      Or it could be

      "Give me apathy, or don't. I don't care."

      Nice try though.

      --
      Windows isn't the answer... it's the question. NO is the answer!
    21. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      It depends upon the quality of the case study. I had one class where the entire grade was based upon writing a business valuation report...analyzing a company, its financial statements and then analyzing similar companies to come up with a value. The professor gave us bits of guidance, but in the end the class was a case study. In fact, that particular class was basically my "pre-internship" for the company I later interned with and eventually went to work for.

      In other classes, there was much more fundamental lecture, but then we went in-depth with various long-term projects to see how it applies.

    22. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Is a checkbook balancing simulator really going to be any more engaging than a page of math problems.

      You really can't get to interesting case studies until you've done the grunt work in grade school.

    23. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by milimetric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I strongly disagree.

      If you make something easy or fun it loses educational value. This is much more obvious in athletics. I have yet to encounter a workout regime that is "fun" and actually works to make you a great athlete. To run even a 5 minute mile, you have to get your ass out there and run until your veins pump acid and keep running and do it every day with a little day of rest once in a while.

      Why is it that everyone seems to think mathematics or language or anything is any different? There may be some geniuses among us that love to learn and absorb everything and make it seem fun. However, they are most often tormented by their passion and driven through some very hard nights of sleeplessness and study.

      To learn something well, you have to work hard at it. When America comes to grips with the fact that working hard is not fun and that you can't buy such and such device to make it fun, it will perhaps be the country it once was. Until then, it is headed in the direction of easy come easy go.

      I am a 23 year old young adult who learned mathematics, programming, language, art, science, history, basketball, all the hard way. I loved every minute of it without having an ounce of fun. I had fun playing starcraft and quake and unreal tournament and pick up basketball games. I've lived in many varied neighborhoods and been educated in many different schools. Trust me on this one. What the world needs is not fun, it's hard work. The world was built on hard work. Having fun would only consume what has been built. Working hard would further develop and build our world. It's your choice, but I sincerely hope we'll choose to work hard.

    24. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Captain+Penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I am inclined to disagree with you. It is not always so simple. Some children simply have major mental and social issues that need to be addressed and merely threatening punishment will do no good. Instead, for some children threatening punishment will only make things worse. Counseling and, if absolutely necessary, medications are the only way to deal with such children. I should know. It happened to my younger brother.

    25. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by karnal · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      Went back to my hometown this weekend, and took a walk at 1am for about a mile or so one way on a dirt road with 2 of my friends. We all turned 30 this year.

      When we were all growing up, we'd walk all over the place, if we needed to get somewhere. Of course, I did eventually get my license, but I still rode my bike and walked, if need be. I can't imagine kids today having curfews and being thought of as criminal if they're out past 10pm or so...

      Of course, I didn't do much screwing around if I was out and about. Maybe other kids are different.

      --
      Karnal
    26. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is worse? Ignorance or apathy?

      Who knows? Who cares?

    27. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree that there are some children with real mental problems that need professional treatment. The problem is that we are getting to the point where ALL children are being treated that way. Drugs are being given to children who don't need them because adults don't want to have to deal with thier naturally overactive personalities instead of teaching them that there is a time and place for different kinds of behavior. Constant counseling given to genuinely 'bad' kids who learn that they can do anything they want and get no punishment at all except having to BS their way through a talk with a boring old guy every few days.

    28. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by sedyn · · Score: 1

      What happens when little Johnny or Sally grows up and has to do real studying?

      It would be great if we could teach real world knowledge through gaming for their entire lives. But, we can't. Should we augment some of the tougher concepts through gaming, yes. All concepts, no.

      This is where I make a point about Grand Theft Auto and encouraging children to be mindless slaves to entertainment for the sake of debate. Then proceed to coat my computer with asbestos for the sake of the flaming. Or something similar.

      --
      Am I open minded towards open source, or closed minded towards closed source?
    29. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      Positive and Negative Reinforcement.
      Positive and Negative Punishment.

      A mixture of all 4 works wonders.

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    30. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by B1ackDragon · · Score: 1

      But then since you can seemingly get branded a child-hating monster of a bad parent nowadays by even looking at your child in a disaproving manner...

      Yeah, and plus it gives us real child-hating monsters a bad name!

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
    31. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by SimilarityEngine · · Score: 1

      Absolutely 100% right. Don't mislead children into thinking that you can become a top physicist/surgeon/athlete without putting in serious hours, and learning the art of self-discipline. We should be teaching them that the best rewards in life come from working extremely bloody hard, doing stuff that sometimes, just sometimes, you will hate. Otherwise what will they do the first time they encounter a genuine challenge?

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    32. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      What exactly is 'positive punishment'?

    33. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      I'm all for learning the grunt work, but it should be followed up with giving the students experience. Actually, my 8th grade check writing lessons were very engaging :)

    34. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by mrRay720 · · Score: 1

      What I meant, of course, is the freedom to commit crimes without fear of retribution.

    35. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by I+Killed+Your+Cat · · Score: 1
      --
      I Killed Your Cat
    36. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by bdcrazy · · Score: 1

      To impart a punishment on the next occurance of the unwanted behavior.

      --
      Tonights forecast: Dark. Continued dark throughout most of the evening, with some widely-scattered light towards morning
    37. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Orkan · · Score: 1

      It's not just a matter of doing the homework. When I started high school I had really bad homework habits. I wasn't really interested in a lot of the subjects, I felt we were given too much work, and I resented school eating into what I saw as my free time. Because of this I usually ended up leaving the work until the night before it was due in and I generally only did the bare minimum necessary. When I went to sixth form this changed; I only had to do subjects that I was interested in, they treated me like a person (i.e. no just threatening me with detentions), and I felt the amount of work was better suited to the time I had available. As a result I usually did the work thoroughly within a day or two of receiving it.

      The homework I did at sixth form helped me a lot and I breezed through my A-levels, whereas I feel my earlier homework barely helped.

      Enforced homework is of little use. Yes, it can help in some ways but it can also make children lose interest and that is more harmful in the long run

    38. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Redwin · · Score: 1

      Beating for people with masochistic tendencies. :-)

      Hmmm, unless by positive punishment you mean that they inflict the punishment on someone else. Kinda like, "if you do well then you get to decide the punishment of those who don't". Motivation to do well through fear of your peers.

      --
      Warning, comments may not have been passed by the sanity department of my brain.
    39. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by dnoyeb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Video games feed information at a relatively accelerated rate. They contribute to low attention span, impatience, and quickness to boredom. Bad qualities to nurture.

      But hey, theres always Ritalin.

    40. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by jd0g85 · · Score: 1
      IMO, it is vital to make homework not feel like homework in order to get children interested in their schooling again and combat their growing apathy.
      Maybe personal responsibility shoudn't feel like personal responsibility in order to get citizens (of America) interested in democracy again and combat their growing apathy
      --
      There is no belief, however foolish, that will not gather its faithful adherents who will defend it to the death.-Asimov
    41. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get a handjob until you are about to get off, then they stop. Repeatedly

    42. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Getting to be less and less true, though. The tough on crime stance requires kids to be tried as adults.

    43. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Savage beatings will continue until morale improves!

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    44. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Analogy+Man · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Right on!

      I am 37 and have heard our generation refered to by some as the last "free range" generation. Some kids got out of line and ended up in trouble, but in balance kids learned where reasonable limits were and were held responsible for their behavior. I later observed in college as a Resident Assistant that the kids to watch out for were the ones who's parents tightly controlled them. The ones that had a longer leash growing up knew how to negotiate the wild wild world without going bonkers. I think the key was that other adults (besides your parents):

      • where around (more stay at home moms)
      • knew who the kids around the neighborhood were
      • cared what they were doing
      • were outside
        • people used to open windows and go outside
        • people would mow their own lawns
        • more people had gardens
        • people walked to places (yesterday a neighbor drove to our house from 5 doors down the street!)
      • could step in and discipline someone else's kid (within reason) without fear of
        • kid shooting them
        • parent shooting them
        • parent filing lawsuit
        • being arrested for assault for hauling a kid home by the scruff of the neck
      • It will never be the same, but I hope to provide for my 4 kids some of the life experience I had that I feel is critical.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    45. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by foilhl2 · · Score: 1

      As a parent myself, and one who volunteers with family community services ... Amen.

    46. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Mr.Progressive · · Score: 1

      As I see it, this has nothing to do with what lazy kids want or what overaccommodating parents want. Rather, this is about what EA wants. Private enterprise is the "savior" of underfunded schools everywhere and this is the unfortunate result. Plenty of exposure of EA to young, impressionable kids and laughable approaches to "education". Yes, I hate to be "the guy" complaining about corporate bogeymen impinging on his present and future, but c'mon, this is pretty obvious.

      --
      Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
    47. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by twifosp · · Score: 1
      Ack, no! This is the WRONG attitude.

      Kids need to learn that work, which may not be fun, but will end up in a positive pay-out is a neccesary thing in life.

      By removing the work-ethic aspect of it, we're teaching kids that if they don't have fun it's not worth doing.

      Kids NEED to understand that sometimes you gotta grit your teeth, suck-it-up, and do some work to get a the pay-off.

      Unless, that is, we're also planning to make all future activities and work into video games as well.

    48. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1
      IMO, it is vital to make homework not feel like homework in order to get children interested in their schooling again and combat their growing apathy.

      No, it's necessairy to make homework be appropriate to the level of development, while preventing it from being a tedious, menial exercise.

      For me, math homework failed both requirements. The teachers usually assigned easy problems that you had to do each night - this took a lot of paper and time, and ultimatly gave no benefit for those who already learned how to do arithmetic.

      Similar problems are occurring with teaching history - while the topic is important, the focus of the education system attempts to pound dates info the minds of students, while completely ignoring the more appropriate or serious aspects (e.g. The date of DDay might not be ultra-important, but the story about German Generals in-fighting over resources is more critical to the purpose of teaching history in the first place.)

    49. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by EasyComputer · · Score: 1

      +1 Insightful

    50. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by lgw · · Score: 1

      I hope no one is stupid enough to answer questions like this on Slashdot (or any internet forum). Don't let your need to assert some sort of moral authority compromise important anonymity, especially for your children.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    51. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Durinthal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They contribute to low attention span, impatience, and quickness to boredom.

      That's because you're letting them play an FPS before an RPG.

    52. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Of course I'm not saying that that should be applied to all children (ie. they should all stop whining and so the work). There are geniune issues out there that need to be addressed. However, the kid saying "sorry, I dun' wanna" is an issue that generally is best solved by saying "sorry, then no video games" rather than by giving them video games in school. :)

    53. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by OnceDark · · Score: 1

      The growing apathy of children is a direct reflection of parental apathy.

      Society should not pander to children just because many parents are too busy with their own lives to pay attention the needs of their kids.

      Things like this continue to make me ill. More families need a stay-at-home parent who looks after the children, helps out at school and teaches their kids what is important.

      So many times I have seen families out in public where one or two of the kids are walking around playing a gameboy or other hand-held blippity-bleep, flashity-flash thing. Interact with your kids for goodness sake. Limit television. Limit videogames. Get a clue.

      Note:
      I am a parent. I limit what my kids can watch/play, etc. I play with my children often. My wife is a stay-at-home parent and I'd do it in a second if she had the better job.

    54. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by mikael · · Score: 1

      Hmmm.. I found the concept of note-taking the most frustrating part. Since there are any number of good text-books and research papers out there, I'd rather have a professor tell me what papers/chapters to read, digest that information in my own time, and then come into class and then go over the material ask about any points that weren't clear. Having to sit and listen to someone else interpretation of a topic while frantically scribbling down every last word in order to guess which were and were not the important bits for the exam, was tedious and frustrating. Especially, when you're studying eight subjects simultaneously and having to do courseworks every evening, having to rewrite every set of lecture notes is just a timewaster.

      Although, as far as Computer Science goes, nothing is better than actually designing and writing real software/hardware examples, with writing essays probably being the worst learning method.

      Using the "video game" approach would be good for simulating chemistry, biology and physics, hardware engineering experiments, where the equipment is expensive, and accident insurance costs are constantly rising.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    55. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I believe you are thinking of television. Video games are almost the exact opposite of what you suggest:

      - They tend to be quite long in length, and are typically played for long durations at a time.

      - They require careful attention to detail, and precision of action (again, over prolonged periods)

      - They require patience to overcome progressively more difficult (and often repetitive and frustrating) challenges.

    56. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by coflow · · Score: 1

      This is not a personal attack (please don't construe it as one), but perhaps you could have taken notes more effectively? I never wrote down every last word; I tended to write down things that were new concepts to me or that I thought could be useful to research later.

      I think you hit the nail on the head when you said "digest that information in my own time". I looked at what the professor said as the real value in return for the money that I was spending, because anybody could take a list of reading material and digest it on their own time. If that's the best way to learn, I think that college would be a waste of time. I would take down those things that the prof. said that gave insight I could not gleam from a book, and used that input to broaden my understanding of the subject.

    57. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      What?!?

      Man, I gotta get me some Alcoa stock, cuz the tin-foil hat population just grows and grows.

      Here's the point: I have 4 children, aged 10, 7, 4, and 4. When the topic is kids and their homework, I get a say, value of 'X.' Some childless 20-something turning his nose up at all the 'breeders' and their 'brats,' he gets a say as well, but it's of considerably less value than 'X.'

      Now, obviously, if the topic is the Fall line of Ikea furniture or the unfortunate choices Cher has made in her career, I yield the floor to the breeder-haters, but since we're talking about raising children here, my question to hungrygrue is valid and remains: "How many children do you have, and what are their ages?" His comment history is riddled with disparaging statements about children; why should one's anonymity afford credibility?

    58. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I bet that classrooms in the 1920s were a hell of a lot more disciplined than they are today. Ever looked in a school recently? They're like war zones. The teachers have no authority, they can't even look at kids the wrong way without being sacked/sued/jailed.

      No-one's talking about a savage beating, just the cane. Kids have too many 'rights' these days. As far as I'm concerned, kids have the 'right' to do as they're damn well told, and nothing else. Soon it'll be illegal to make them do homework or even go school at all in case it hurts their feelings.

      The whole point of corporal punishment isn't to punish or dissuade individual incidents, it's to let them know who's in charge.

      It's not surprising that schools with the harshest discipline get the best results, and so are the schools where all the parents want to send their kids.

    59. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by lgw · · Score: 1

      I figured there was an ad-hominum argument lurking behind your request. But it's just a bad habit to give out info like that online. You're never as anonymous as you think you are, and Slashdot has a very large audience.

      From my point of veiw you only need one test to see how good a parent someone (with younger children) is - have them take their kids to a restauraunt for an hour-long meal. The parenting skills will be proven. Short of passing that test, I'll treat everyone's parenting advice with equal skepticism.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    60. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      ad-hominum argument

      Ad hominem? I'm missing that. Don't see it, you'll have to be specific.

      From my point of veiw

      And what perspective is that, that of a parent or a non-parent?

    61. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by mikael · · Score: 1

      Not at all - This was only for a single subject - oddly enough in two universities I've worked at, it was always Database Systems who never gave handouts, but insisted students take their own notes, even though both courses were taken straight out of a textbook.

      This was in the time before PDA's, Powerpoint presentations, and PDF documents. I considered using a personal voice recorder like several other students did, but it was sufficient to highlight the key phrases from the papers being discussed (I never liked scribbling over textbooks).

      If I had to take lectures again, I would probably use a PDA to record what the professor was saying, and if it had sufficient resolution, also take pictures of the whitescreen/overhead projector. Although now, everyone seems to have switched over to Powerpoint presentations, and give out a link to the PDF of the paper, and maybe give out the occassional handout.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    62. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by cliffski · · Score: 1

      depends on the game.if its EA trying to get kids hooked on their sports franchises earlier that sucks, but if its using games like this: Democracy That actually educate people as they entertain, thats good.

      --
      DRM-free indie games for the PC and Mac: Positech Games
    63. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by coflow · · Score: 1

      Oooh, that was always the worst type of professor to me, the one that lectures straight out of the book. I always felt like I was being ripped off when I got one of those types. It's like going to a five star restaurant and the chef orders Outback for you...

    64. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by dancpsu · · Score: 1
      Well, part of the problem today is taxes:
      In fact in 1950 the average American family paid 2% in taxes. Today that average American family pays 27% in taxes to the federal government. Oddly enough the difference, 25%, is what the average second wage earner makes in America today.
      from here

      The lawsuit thing is a big deal too. No one disciplines anyone for fear of a lawsuit. Maybe a patch on the problem would be for lawyers to serve subpeonas as "discipline". K-12 schools could have a lawyer on call, and serve a lawsuit to each parent whose kid got sent to the principal's office. All in all, without a more family friendly tax structure that allows one parent to stay at home, and severe tort reform to stop all the stupid lawsuits (severe punisment to the person suing if their lawsuit consists of "my kid was hurt because you made him sit down in class") this whole society will go down the toilet.
      --
      "Scientists don't change their minds, they just die." -- Max Planck
    65. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. There's nothing "intelligent" about an RPG. Well, then again, they might improve math skills trying to min/max.

    66. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      bet that classrooms in the 1920s were a hell of a lot more disciplined than they are today. Ever looked in a school recently? They're like war zones. The teachers have no authority, they can't even look at kids the wrong way without being sacked/sued/jailed.

      Not all schools are however liek that, and I think that the situation is not quite as alarming as you make it out to be.


      Kids have too many 'rights' these days. As far as I'm concerned, kids have the 'right' to do as they're damn well told, and nothing else.

      It's obvious that the majority disagrees with your boot camp approach. Kids have rights, granted not as many as adults, but I do not think they have too many. An education, safety, security, breaks, is that really unreasonable? They are human too, they need to be brought up correctly, but treating them like crap won't do that at all. They will do what they are told if made to do so, and I agree that they should, but the way you approach it... it's too lacking of exceptions and circumstance. What if the teacher is threatening for no reason... is drunk... on drugs... or asks them to do dangerous things... surely that is a time where they should do more than what they are told, right?


      Which leads me to my philosophy... we have many problems partially because of people who try to implement the kind of ideals you want and fail miserably, or have too many emotional problems... at least in the high school I went to it was the problem. Not at all am I saying out of control kids are not the problem, but you take it that this is a one should fit all solution even where it isn't problematic, or as problematic.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    67. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by lgw · · Score: 1

      An ad hominem attack is attacking the speaker instead of the argument. Why should it matter whether I'm a parent or not (not like you can tell if I'm truthful) when it comes to evaluating the usefulness of my restaurant test (or the ancestor post's arguments)? You're looking for an excuse to say "you're not a parent, so you know nothing". Regardless of the details of my family that won't be divulged on /., if you can't make your kids behave for an hour in a quiet-ish public place (or don't see the need to), you suck at life.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    68. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Chandon+Seldon · · Score: 1

      I'd say that feeding kids information is a big step up from the alternitive.

      --
      -- The act of censorship is always worse than whatever is being censored. Always.
    69. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by mikael · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what Outback means, but I guess it would be the equivalent of roadkill? Visions of dead squirrel on a platter...

      I think it depends on the subject - if you're doing an undergraduate subject like object orientated programming using C++/Modula-2/Java, ASIC design, Mathematics or Statistics then there's no other option but to use a textbook, but I would expect and a readable (modular) book with both questions and answers. The worst situation is when a really bad book is selected simply because the author is an ex-college friend of the professor. Having professors who are currently researching the field they are teaching, are using the latest technology, and are currently working in industry are definitely the best.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    70. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by focitrixilous+P · · Score: 1
      I think the ever so subtle irony of correcting a post about apathy has escaped you.

      "Dork."

      --
      SAILING MISHAP
    71. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by Analogy+Man · · Score: 1
      The decision to have a parent stay at home (one we made by the way) requires choices. We don't take expensive vacations, we don't live in a 3,600 sq ft McMansion, we drive cars into the ground, we don't buy mountains of toys to make up for stuffing kids in daycare...

      Much of that 25% from a second income goes toward supporting expensive choices.

      --
      When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.
    72. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by confused.brit · · Score: 1

      takeaway?

      --
      Sigs are for wimps
    73. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by dnoyeb · · Score: 1

      There is no difference.

      Try turning the speed down and playing a slow game of starcraft. See how everyone complains about it. Heck even official SC games on battlenet are set a notch faster than a few years ago...

    74. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

      An ad hominem attack is attacking the speaker instead of the argument.

      Um, I know that, D00d. I've borne more than my share of them online for something like 15 years.

      My point here is that perspective of the speaker is valid. Putting it in /. terms: if a poster has a history of trashing Linux, denigrating it and its users, is in fact an avowed and rabid Windows devotee, his contribution to a discussion re the development of the Linux kernel should be viewed (in the very least) as, say, 'colored.' Practically speaking, he would probably get shouted down and modded as Troll. "Hungrygrue" has just such a comment history re Children, yet in a discussion re new theories for their development, his rant and namecalling got modded *up*. It's not a "you're not a parent, so you know nothing" thing, it's a "you've plainly established that you hate children so why are you even part of this discussion" thing.

      you suck at life.

      Beware those snap judgements, my friend. They have a way of coming and back and biting you somewhere down the line.

      Peace.

    75. Re:I beleive this to be the future of education by adamgolding · · Score: 1

      keep in mind, however, that children who are driven to do their work by extrinsic forces often lack any intrinsic motivation for those activities--"why am i doing this? they're making me learn, so it couldn't be because i WANT to learn--so it must be that the main purpose of learning is avoiding punishment. once the punishment is gone, i won't have to learn anymore--phew!"--and how many college students are there who 'just want a degree'--i.e. they JUST want the reward of a high paying job and that's it. fuck learning!--i'm doing this for a reason--MONEY...

            this has be studied in social psycholgy in many ways, including reading programs involving free pizzas, etc. rewards and punishments tend to reduce intrinsic motivation. this is especially true if intrsic motivation was high initially, however the effect can be minimized if rewards a scaled based on performance, as opposed to a binary "task is complete, you get the reward" situation.

      anyway, the point is, it is NOT as simple as "just fucking MAKE them do it!!!!"--that parenting philsophy can have troubles of its own. now, studies *have* demonstrate that parents who strike a balance between permissive and authoritarian parenting tend to achieve the best results, but we're far from establishing causation in that instance--maybe they're able to strike a balance because their children were more well adjusted to begin with...

  4. How 'bout teaching the three "R"s? by mmell · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know - Readin', Ritin', and 'Rithmatic? After all, it worked for decades here in the USA!

    1. Re:How 'bout teaching the three "R"s? by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 1

      Yep... and now we have 'Raq.

      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
    2. Re:How 'bout teaching the three "R"s? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder US americans can't spell!

    3. Re:How 'bout teaching the three "R"s? by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Which is apt because the three R's should really be W.A.R (well RWA) .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    4. Re:How 'bout teaching the three "R"s? by gmuller · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It worked fin in the ol' U.S.A. before we starting catering to the LCD, you know, lowest common denominator. gmuller

    5. Re:How 'bout teaching the three "R"s? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Great idea! How about a game where zombies attack you, but they're holding signs with words on them, and you have to say the word in order to kill the zombie. In advanced levels, they could be wearing sandwich boards with entire sentences on them, and in the final level, a series of zombies could attack, each carrying the next paragraph of William Golding's Lord of the Flies. Yeah, that would really get kids to enjoy their...

      Er, that's not what you had in mind?

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    6. Re:How 'bout teaching the three "R"s? by eremitic · · Score: 1

      I read that second R as "ritalin." :-x

      --
      Warning: Could be fatal if taken seriously
    7. Re:How 'bout teaching the three "R"s? by jjr1 · · Score: 1

      This level is brought to you by the letter 'R'....

      --
      Best Trivia answer ever... Name the largest aquatic man eater... Contestant: Tsunami
    8. Re:How 'bout teaching the three "R"s? by BitwizeGHC · · Score: 1

      You liked "Typing of the Dead" too? :)

      --
      N4st0r, trixx0r h0bb1tz0rz! Th3y st0l3 0ur pr3c10uzz!
    9. Re:How 'bout teaching the three "R"s? by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      And administering the other three Rs:

      Reefer, Ritalin and Rohypnol.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
  5. Calling Captain Obvious by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it's work, it won't bring the same satisfaction as playing a game for pleasure.

    1. Re:Calling Captain Obvious by bedroll · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Exactly.

      As an example I'll use my nephew. When he was 5 years old my brother-in-law bought a new computer, after two years of me pleading that he accept that his Packard Bell Pentium 133 wasn't up to playing 99% of available video games. When he did this we almost immediately bought my nephew several K-3 educational video games. At first he really liked them and was excited to play them, until someone gave him their old playstation. Now you can't pull him away from your standard lot of sports and kids games. These games do little to teach more than hand-eye coordination. They are more fun, though, so he'll stick to them.

    2. Re:Calling Captain Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wrote small computer programs in the fifth grade that let my do my english (and later, german) homework on the computer.
      I remember it being more fun to do the homework using those programs.... or was it more fun to write the programs than doing the homework? I forget...

    3. Re:Calling Captain Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would consider most MMORPG's work once you reach a certain level, yet look at the crackheads still playing em ;)

    4. Re:Calling Captain Obvious by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's just like those sex education classes... never as satisfying as the real thing!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  6. Ouija Board by captnjameskirk · · Score: 5, Funny

    And in related news, the TEA are consulting Ouija Boards to determine the next Social Studies curriculum.

  7. All your homework are belong to us. by jwriney · · Score: 5, Funny

    Your Homework is Play Video Games

    Apparently someone skipped their English homework.

    --riney

    1. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by strider44 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not necessarily. The capitalisations of "Play Video Games" suggest that it is a title of a subject or field of homework, in which case the grammar is correct.

    2. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      "their" -> "his or her"
      </pedant>

    3. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by Evro · · Score: 1

      Meh, just use "his" and be done with the politically correct crap. "His/her" and "(s)he" need to go away.

      --
      rooooar
    4. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by ApolloCreed · · Score: 1

      'To be honest, the applications more likely to take off are ones where students can file homework online.'

    5. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by stewby18 · · Score: 1

      No, it suggests that it is in the title of an article, where almost all words are capitalized.

    6. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently someone skipped their English homework.

      And as a make-up assignment, their new homework is improve English.

    7. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by Evolt's+RonL. · · Score: 1

      Sorry man, couldn't do my homework ... f-ing dog ate my joystick!

    8. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by itchy92 · · Score: 1

      Actually, if it was properly formatted to be a title, "is" would also have to be capitalized, since the only things you don't capitalize are prepositions and noun identifiers (unless they are at the beginning of the title).

      Conversely, it's not properly formatted to be a sentence wherein "Play Video Games" is a title or subject, since "Homework" is capitalized. You could argue that "Homework" refers to a proper noun in this case rather than the common noun, although there is no reason to assume that. Furthermore, I really hate myself for taking the time to argue this crap. Sorry.

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    9. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word 'they' can be singular. Historically and contemporary usage bears this out. http://www.google.com/search?q=they+singular

    10. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by Distinguished+Hero · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently someone skipped their English homework.

      Perhaps it was administered to them in the form of video games.

      --
      Uttering logically derived and empirically supported truths to the disciples of the orthodox establishment.
    11. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by lgw · · Score: 1

      Every time I need to choose a gender for an unkonw referent, I flip a coin to choose "his" or "her". Strangely enough, I ended up with "his" the past 1729 times. :) Of course "his/her" and "(s)he" might be two new transgendered pronouns in the PC world, I never can keep up.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    12. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by lgw · · Score: 1

      It can be, but like using the word "ain't", using the "singular they" sends sideband information you might not want to transmit. It's good for showing that a character lacks education through dialog, however, so it's still a useful tool.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    13. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by doshell · · Score: 1

      Why not "them"? I use it all the time (even if the subject is singular), and it doesn't feel too awkward after you get used to it. I don't know how grammatically correct it is (I'm not a native speaker, besides), but I've seen it quite often.

      --
      Score: i, Imaginary
    14. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by lgw · · Score: 1

      It's not really correct for formal writing. There are some people so obsessed with political correctness that they abuse the language, but the proper English is to use "him" when the sex of the referent is unknown or unimportant. There's not really a neutral gender in English, but the male pronouns can be properly used as if they were neutral.

      Even more formally, one can use "one" as a neutral pronoun, but one's writing might be considered archaic. (And technically, "one" is the formal second-person pronoun, not the neutral third-person pronoun, not that is really matters).

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    15. Re:All your homework are belong to us. by Trejkaz · · Score: 1

      I thought the guy was commenting about the "to" which was missing from the title.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
  8. Hmm... by Musteval · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder what their adult education games are like.

    *moves to UK*

    --
    Note to mods: I'm probably being sarcastic.
    1. Re:Hmm... by ryanov · · Score: 2

      We've already got Hot Coffee here. All they got over there's tea.

    2. Re:Hmm... by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      So you haven't seen the GTA:SA "Hot Tea (milk, two sugars and a scone)" mod yet? I thought everyone was grabbing the torrent!

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
  9. how about by jest3r · · Score: 1

    Lemonade Stand ...

    1. Re:how about by utopianfiat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oregon Trail
      Dino Park Tycoon
      Odell Down Under

      and the endless other games we played in school. How is this new?

      --
      +5, Truth
    2. Re:how about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That old game is pretty much the reason why I am now a programmer. It was pretty boring at first, but then someone showed me that we could modify how it worked, that you could change it's behaviour, that you could make it do what you wanted. I fell in love with programming right then!

      So basically, I'm a programmer because of *almost* open source code.! :P

      Thanks whoever made this and to my old school for buying that software! :P

    3. Re:how about by jjr1 · · Score: 1

      Looking back at it now Oregon Trail really isn't all that educational. Besides how to spell dysentery what did it really teach you? Most of the kids I remember just spent the entire time hunting. And people wondered why it was always more popular than word and number munchers at school.

      --
      Best Trivia answer ever... Name the largest aquatic man eater... Contestant: Tsunami
    4. Re:how about by utopianfiat · · Score: 1

      Also didn't take them long to figure out the stupid joke that you can make when you die.

      YOU HAVE DIED.
      PLEASE ENTER YOUR EPITAPH:
      What do you want on your tombstone?
      P-E-P-P-E-R-O-N-I-sp-A-N-D-sp-C-H-E-E-S-E
      oh, you're so funny.

      --
      +5, Truth
    5. Re:how about by ninjagin · · Score: 1
      Wow. That brings back sooo many good memories. Late nights with the ][+, desperately trying to break my best score. Simple simulation, but very engaging.

      --
      .. pa-ra-bo-la, pa-ra-bo-la, 2 pi R, 2 pi R, where's your latus rectum, where's your latus rectum, 2 pi R
  10. There's a simple truth in all of this. by rob_squared · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Some work just can't be fun. And playing games for one area will just detract from another (IMHO).

    --
    I don't get it.
    1. Re:There's a simple truth in all of this. by grasshoppa · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some work just can't be fun.

      You are a product of the industrialized education system. So am I. We were taught that work wasn't fun, it was work. And it wasn't something we had a choice in, regardless.

      My daughter *loves* school. She loves the work, and looking it over, so would I ( and would have, at her age. ).

      When I was in 2nd grade, my math homework ( for example ) was a sheet of numbers and operators. She brings home these little booklets that have word problems, stories, with numbers. Both accomplish the same thing, but hers also teaches problem solving ( figuring out which numbers go where in the equation ) AND she enjoys it because it's a story.

      I won't even get into the science. They do some awsome things with science now.

      History, for some reason, they still teach like they did when I was in school. On this date, this happened. On this date, this happened. And then they test you on the dates. idiotic.

      My overall point being, we were taught by our schools not to have fun while doing work. Now a days, teachers have better tools at their disposal, and kids are actually learning to have fun while working.

      Now if we could only get the parents to show some interest in their child's education and get the ID people to drop it. A scary world where a teacher feels too threatened to teach science theory because of religous nuts.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:There's a simple truth in all of this. by UnderDark · · Score: 1

      I am a Junior in the American public high school system, and I can tell you that I would prefer the page with the numbers and operators. I always have loved the logics part of school, and I don't mind the fact that I have to memorize facts/formulas. As a programmer, I find myself doing just that more and more (with syntaxes and routines).

      I would also like to point out that school is NOT a playground! School was not meant to be fun, it was meant to be place of learning. I for one would probably not play the game beyond the required parts, I would spend too much time trying to figure out how to modify it to suit my own educational and philosophical endeavors.

    3. Re:There's a simple truth in all of this. by GozzoMan · · Score: 1


      I declare beforehand that I live in Italy, not USA, so the situation might be a little different.

      My daughter *loves* school. She loves the work, and looking it over, so would I ( and would have, at her age. ). [...]

      I agree to each word from the parent msg, and I don't think that the fact that the children do should learn to apply and commit, since life's not so easy after all, has really nothing to detract from the reasonableness of try to raise them to love knowledge and skill-building, and have fun with them. On the contrary: to love what you do (or at least to love what you are able to love in what you do), can be a great advantage in confronting the uneasy situations of life.

      On the other hand, I am absolutely astonished by the number of posts advocating children beating. Maybe I'm just a bohémien European or whatever, but I had the impression that /. was a place where the Free roam. How can a man be a free man if raised by violent coercion?

      With regard to that, where I think the grandparent has a point is:

      Children nowadays are given more and more freedom and less and less resonsponsibilites.

      Well, my understanding is that children should be given freedom and responsibilities; and this is more important that even knowledge and skills, since I think that we do should try to raise our children as competent engineers, doctors and whatever, but even before and more important, we should try to raise them as citizens, or in the end they will be no more than labourers and consumers.

      To be a citizen, love for freedom and will to take responsibilities are both fundamental; but what's the point of will to take responsibilities without love for freedom? To make the perfect slave? No, thank you, not my sons.

      I want my sons to be responsible independent free thinkers, even to question my authority, to demand me reasons for, when they feels to.

      I do prefer to risk and raise a rebel than to risk and raise a slave.

    4. Re:There's a simple truth in all of this. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      I would also like to point out that school is NOT a playground

      Hence the problem. For me, school wasn't exciting, it wasn't interesting. It was a place to go during the day that I didn't want to go.

      School should be a fun, exciting and interesting place to be. For the love of Dogs ( I'm dyslexic ), it's a place to learn! What can be more exciting than that?

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    5. Re:There's a simple truth in all of this. by svkal · · Score: 1

      Sure, the purpose of schoolwork is education, not entertainment. The two, however, are neither opposites nor inherently incompatible: Many people theorise that if learning does not entertain the student in any way, he or she will lose interest in the subject being taught and learn less efficiently. A simple demonstration of this is that people tend to perform worse in subjects they find uninteresting or boring.

      While I enjoy the stringently logical fields of study as well, throughout my entire education I've personally loathed the equivalents of "those pages with numbers and operators". To me, they appeared to be mindless and horribly repetetive exercises that served no real educational purpose. Worse: being very time-intensive because of the sheer mass of calculations students were asked to do, they took away time that could have been spent focusing on more interesting aspects of, e.g., mathematics.

      That said, most attempts at making school "fun" fail miserably and end up having little entertainment value and little educational value. Furthermore, a video game can't tailor the level and focus of the education to the individual student like a good teacher can, no matter what the sticker on the box says, so I'm generally skeptical of spending time on such "automated education".

      It's just important not to fall into the trap of thinking that because school wasn't meant to be fun, school can't be, or shouldn't be, fun - those are reactionary ideas that are hard to justify.

    6. Re:There's a simple truth in all of this. by lpangelrob · · Score: 1
      Conversely, would you think it was a scary world when a teacher feels too threatened to teach arguments and counterarguments for intelligent design because of anti-creationist nuts?

      But I agree with the rest of your post wholeheartedly. :-)

    7. Re:There's a simple truth in all of this. by dominion · · Score: 1

      a teacher feels too threatened to teach arguments and counterarguments for intelligent design because of anti-creationist nuts?

      You misspelled 'scientists.'

    8. Re:There's a simple truth in all of this. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Conversely, would you think it was a scary world when a teacher feels too threatened to teach arguments and counterarguments for intelligent design because of anti-creationist nuts?

      As long as they don't teach it as a science, I have no problems with it being taught in school. Evolution is science, ID is a belief.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  11. It's a start by Nairoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The way I see it, at least they're considering if this is a good idea, rather than going down the "games=bad" route. All of the skills they want to teach the kids, from the article, are present in games.

    I'd be interested to see how this turns out, and if it's actually teacher-led "gaming", as it were, rather than "I'll sit here with a cup of tea catching up on my mountain of paperwork when you play these games and hopefully learn something".

    At the very least, it's a start.

    --
    Just another harmless drunk
    1. Re:It's a start by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Kids will tend to think something is great fun when it is a video game. I think this could also be applied to gym class. Why not have Dance Dance Revolution setups in gym classes? It is a great workout, and lots of kids might enjoy what they are doing!

      Not to say that gym class should be only this sort of thing... it just might be a worthwhile component.

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  12. Games in school? Not MY child! by Knight+Thrasher · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Some parent, some where, is in a panic thinking the system is about to spring GTA on their kid.

    It's been said before that parents don't care what kind of games their kids play but rather how much time they're spending playing them.

  13. Make video games cool? by burtdub · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does this mean the next generation will procrastinate by reading Socrates and performing Fourier Transforms?

    1. Re:Make video games cool? by dascandy · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, sorry, that was the previous one. The next one will use Bacardi Breezer 4nd 1337sp33k.

    2. Re:Make video games cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or, the next one will procrastinate using sticks and stones

    3. Re:Make video games cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The nitpick patrol: either "reading Plato" or "reading about Socrates", since Socrates didn't left any writings for posterity.
      Sorry, couldn't help. Now please continue with your own regular OCD out-acting ...

    4. Re:Make video games cool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...since Socrates didn't left any writings for posterity... Did he right and writings for posterity?

  14. Drivers Ed by rlp · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A lot of American schools have eliminated drivers ed. It would be useful for a driving simulator (not racing) that is designed to help new drivers with both normal driving (merging, heavy traffic, navigation) and emergency situations (accident avoidance, skids, bad weather, etc).

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Drivers Ed by Eddy_D · · Score: 1

      How about GTA San Andreas? - Eddy_D

      --
      - I stole your sig.
    2. Re:Drivers Ed by tont0r · · Score: 1, Informative

      id imagine a lot of schools have simulators. i went to a really ghetto highschool and we somehow managed to get some. it wasnt really a game though. it was a machine that played a movie (same one no matter one) and it would keep a log of if you did the right things or the wrong things.

    3. Re:Drivers Ed by Doverite · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I had this idea a while ago. The problem is that unlike flight sims like MSFS nobody is willing to risk the potential for lawsuits and liability that these things would generate. Nobody expects to only use a flight sim program to learn to fly but all those teenagers are to big a risk for the software companies to take, not my opinion but, otherwise there would be dozens of these simulators. I know I'd spend a couple hundred on SW and equipment for myself let alone my kid. But all those ambulance chasers out there would look past the hundreds of lives these things could save to sue the company for a few mill. because there is a potential flaw in the program.

      --
      You can legislate morally you can't legislate morality
    4. Re:Drivers Ed by Kalak · · Score: 1

      There are sumulations like your suggestion on the market already. They are geared towards passing your driver's test. I've seen them come with or without a steering wheel. It's been a while though, so I don't have the name of one. I'm sure if you tell a teenager to find one on the net before they can get their license, they'll find it.

      IIRC, they were PC based, though a console based one makes sense as well, since not everyone has a computer. Anyone want to make one?

      --
      I am, and always will be, an idiot. Karma: Coma (mostly effected by .hack)
    5. Re:Drivers Ed by Transcendent · · Score: 1

      It's called Grand Theft Auto.

    6. Re:Drivers Ed by hahafaha · · Score: 1

      Drivers Ed is an online driving education game. You can play it here. I believe it requires Shockwave to play...

    7. Re:Drivers Ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with this though is that a computer simulation cannot recreate things like the feel of the steering wheel when a car hydroplanes or hits black ice nor the actual feeling of driving with several vehicles around you. To me, learning to drive with a simulator would seem to produce more bad drivers than we have now, given that I know that in games, I am much more willing to try dumb things because all I am going to destroy are a few polygons.

    8. Re:Drivers Ed by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      No simulators?!

      What about Sega Rally? Daytona USA? Screamer? Smashing Drive (my personal favourite :-)?

    9. Re:Drivers Ed by k31bang · · Score: 1

      When I took Drivers ed back in '97 or '98, half of my course was in what they called the "simulator". Basicly driving movies from the 1960s and '70's were played, and you had to steer/brake a the right times or the system would score you lower. If i hear "Look left, look right, look left again" one more time in my lifetime, I'll go on a rampage. We all got so much more out of the real driving. Including the snow driving. That was a blast. Good Ole Pittsford, NY.

      --
      -+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+ *** http://www.mountainfort.com *** +-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-=-+-
    10. Re:Drivers Ed by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I learned to drive from GTA.

  15. Problem-solving by daniil · · Score: 1
    FTA:'We're looking at developing some of the softer skills that are needed for the 21st century, such as problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration.'

    I don't get all the fuzz about problem-solving. What's so special about it? Why has it suddenly become so important? You can find it even in the synopses of some of the subjects taught in colleges: "helps improve problem-solving skills" or something similar. Except that, well, it's no use if you are a wicked awesome problem solver, but you cannot find the fucking problem as you have no experience with the thing in question.

    That, of course, is just my totally uninformed opinion. Mod me flamebait if you wish.

    --
    Man is a slave because freedom is difficult, whereas slavery is easy.
    1. Re:Problem-solving by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      Part of problem solving *is* defining the problem.

      As you pointed out, what good is being able to solve a problem if you can't define it. You aren't the first to come up with this insight, and as such, these things are taught if the teacher is truly interested in teaching problem solving.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:Problem-solving by Talrinys · · Score: 0

      I have to say that is the wisest thing i have heard for a long time. I'm a 14 year old from a danish private school, and when i hear about the stuff other schools are doing i am so glad that my parents put me here(even though they have crappy computers!) Problem-solving is a skill of course, a skill that gets developed by learning the origin of the problem and how to fix it, that's it, it really ain't a hell lot harder than that. Some schools here are doing things like letting kids do their assignments in school in 5 different ways, like you can go play a ball game and the teacher will show you how it realates to the laws of gravity. I don't see how that will work, seriously, you spend 5 times as much money that could well have went into improving the books and other educational resources. If you spend 10 years playing games instead of learning maths the proper way do you really think you will get it, or will you think of the game instead? I guess that is individual, but the traditional way has worked here for over 250 years so why not today? "We're looking at developing some of the softer skills that are needed for the 21st century, such as problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration." That is just plain wrong, a kid that doesn't know how to collaborate or be persistent enough to solve a problem, shouldn't have extra resources spent on them, they need a friggin lesson where teachers tell them how the rest of their lives will be. You don't tell your boss that you don't want to collaborate, of that this problem takes too long so i will just go do something else instead. So why teach kids that that is ok and a common problem?

    3. Re:Problem-solving by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      >> "I don't get all the fuzz about problem-solving. What's so special about it? Why has it suddenly become so important?"

      Perhaps it is because of the overwhelming lack of critical thinking and other cognitive skills in young adults nowadays. Apparently, someone thought that *barely* being capable of reading and/or writing was not enough to perform any real work.

      But that could also be my totally uninformed opinion, too.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    4. Re:Problem-solving by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps it is because of the overwhelming lack of critical thinking and other cognitive skills in young adults nowadays.
      I wonder if every generation says this about the generation they produced. Meanwhile technology still progesses forward.

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    5. Re:Problem-solving by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      Yes, technological progress still marches on, but at what expense? The cost seems to be the alienation of its users, as they continue to lose interest in (or lack exposure to) rational thinking, problem solving, social interaction, and other basic human tasks.

      The advent of the automobile certainly made transportation and communication more efficient and accessible; and so did the telephone, the personal computer, and the Internet, in their time. But just as there was a time when auto owners used to understand and be able to repair and maintain their own vehicles, there was a time when computer owners used to know how their tools worked, which ultimately resulted in better and more responsible use of them.

      My point is that the more technology takes over our most basic tasks, the less humans have to perform, well, *human* actions. Until eventually, that most specific of human functions, reasoning, will not be necessary. It might make modern life easier, but some argue that the price is just too high.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    6. Re:Problem-solving by mashx · · Score: 1
      That is just plain wrong, a kid that doesn't know how to collaborate or be persistent enough to solve a problem, shouldn't have extra resources spent on them, they need a friggin lesson where teachers tell them how the rest of their lives will be.

      Unfortunately, IMO, you have just described a large percentage of people, let alone school children. Just because you can already see that you will need these skills, doesn't mean most people can. When I was at school, I completely understood why I would need maths, but I couldn't see the value in working on a 'group' project when I could 'do' half the problems in my head. But the problem I was working on wasn't the specific maths problem or physics problem, it was the problem of getting people working together and working out how we could solve the problem. My job consists of collabarative problem solving, and if only half the people that work for me had those skills, I'd be able to spend so many more days doing things I wanted to do, rather than solving their problems for them rather than collaborating to solve their problems.

      I think what is missing is that so many kids leave school with just 'instructions' that when they come across a problem or situation that they don't have the instructions for, they just stop. Even just looking for the cause of the problem is beyond a lot of people. If they are unable to even consider looking for the origin of the problem it indicates to me they have missed being taught simple problem solving, which is why I believe it is needed.

      You are right that not all (even most) teaching can be based on this idea and there is a need for a lot of instructional teaching (e.g. mathematical methods, using correct grammar (and paragraphs :-p)), but at least some teaching including how to go about solving a problem with lateral thinking should be included.

      Lastly, don't forget that spending the extra money so that the general level of education of a country can only ever be a Good Thing, since it means less time having to deal with those people, just as you say, for the rest of their lives. Not everyone can understand a concept just by reading about it, they have to see it.

      --

      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~
    7. Re:Problem-solving by ErichTheRed · · Score: 1

      I don't get all the fuzz about problem-solving. What's so special about it? Why has it suddenly become so important?

      Lack of problem solving and critical thinking skills is a major problem these days in companies and in general. Do you work in the corporate world? There is a big lack of ability to do big-picture, innovative thinking anymore. People are very good about following set procedures, but those jobs are going overseas. Think about it...how much creative skill does it take to tell someone their credit card balance over the phone, or reboot a server when it's hung? This is exactly why white-collar outsourcing is happening, and people who aren't armed with a good head for larger-scale tasks are in for a lot of trouble.

      I did technical support in large companies...it's mind-boggling how many people can't understand basic cause-and-effect reasoning.

    8. Re:Problem-solving by lgw · · Score: 1

      Have you studied geometry yet? The only purpose of this class is to teach "problem solving" skills, in this case logic. Many kids get out of school with no ability at logical reasoning at all. If these same logicl skills could be taught by a computer game (I'm pretty sure they can't, but just as an example) there'd really be no point in teaching geometry. Strangely enoug, the ability to prove that two traingles are similar has never come in handy.

      Of course, orginizational skillls and several other useful skills are part of "problem solving" and can be taught through computer games. I learned the foundation for my engineering skills through understanding resource management in turn-based strategy games. Games can teach how to break a problem into to smaller problems until you get peices you can handle (organizational skills) and can teach how to optimize for particular goals. Learning *how* to collaborate effectively on large problems is certainly a usefull skill (and one that, back when I used to lead large raids in a MMORPG, I wished more people *had* learned in games!).

      Some skills can only be learned through rote and drill. That won't change. But there are other skills also worth learning.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    9. Re:Problem-solving by lgw · · Score: 1

      . But just as there was a time when auto owners used to understand and be able to repair and maintain their own vehicles, there was a time when computer owners used to know how their tools worked, which ultimately resulted in better and more responsible use of them.

      People didn't become less smart - cars became more complicated. They also became more reliable, so you could just drive, and not have to worry about being a mechanic. I don't see any evidence that this has resulted in less responsible driving - some percentage of people are just idiots, and this is true whereever (and whenever) you look.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    10. Re:Problem-solving by dzfoo · · Score: 1

      You missed my point. People didn't become less smart because they couldn't fix their cars; they became *less active* without an incentive to walk to get to the places they needed to go. The phone also didn't make people stupid, but decreased the necessity to interact in person with others. E-mail and Instant Messaging are doing the same. This in itself is not a bad thing, and I am not advocating it is.

      However, the more activies and tasks we abdicate to technology, the less we have to do. This can be A Good Thing, of course, as it frees us from some menial burdens, to do other things. But if we in turn relinquish those "other things" to technology too, we run out of meaningful tasks to perform. And if one of those meaningful tasks is rational thought, then there goes our humanity.

      In a Brave New World this would be great; no need for hard work, nor difficult things such as decision making and critical thinking; just pure leisure and pleasure, all the time. But in reality, it atrophies the mind, and distorts our perception of the world around us; in essence turning people into unthinking idiots.

            -dZ.

      --
      Carol vs. Ghost
      ...Can you save Christmas?
    11. Re:Problem-solving by lgw · · Score: 1

      I suspect people who enjoy problem solving seek out problems to solve, not the other way around. There are also more opportunities for full-time problem solving than ever before.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
  16. Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sending out an Immediate Action Memo to boycott all schools which use this EA-sponsored plan. Electronic Arts is bad news for everyone.

    Local merchants must not sell to students, faculty, or staff of any EA-sponsored school. No employer may hire any graduate of any EA-sponsored school. No motor vehicle company may allow its products to drop children off at any EA-sponsored school.

    With your help, parents, we can win this fight.

  17. Great idea! by October_30th · · Score: 5, Funny
    skills that are needed for the 21st century, such as problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration.

    Hey, what a great idea! We never needed those before, but NOW there's some serious demand for brand new skills like problem-solving.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  18. Problem solving skills... by Iriel · · Score: 1

    Like finding l337 phucking ways around $h|77y chat filters? I'm sure these kids will be giving presentations at Black Hat in no time ;) </drippingwithsarcasm>

    --
    Perfecting Discordia
    www.stevenvansickle.com
  19. How effective are these "educational" games? by manavendra · · Score: 3, Informative

    There was talk early this year (or was it last year), about the game developed by WHO, to teach young kids in the developed countries, about the plight and standard of living of people in third world countries. However, it met with the same fate as the others that I heard of in the past... the launch of such a game is covered a lot by the media, but fizzles out with no updates posted about the effectivness.

    On the other hand, how does one measure the effectiveness of such an initiative?

    As for this trial, one has to wonder how much of a push is it from the gaming giant to lure more children into the gaming world?

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
  20. MOD PARENT UP PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hes teh funnay

  21. Good game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, and let'em play GTA San Andreas, some say it's good for sexual education.

  22. How 'bout teaching the three outcomes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You know - Readin', Ritin', and 'Rithmatic? After all, it worked for decades here in the USA!"

    Yeah! And look at how well we turned out.

    1. Re:How 'bout teaching the three outcomes? by JLEGERE · · Score: 1

      'Readin, 'Writin, 'Rithmatic...

      You forgot 'Ritalin...

  23. Together at last? by deathwombat · · Score: 0

    Videogames as homework? Oh my god they've done the impossible!!!! *Head explodes*

    --
    Accept any challenge, No matter the odds.
  24. Sounds like fun! by TildeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When I was little, I had all the computer games like Operation Neptune, Super Solvers Midnight Rescue, Where in Time is Carmen Sandiego, Number Munchers, and so on. Those were totally awesome. I'd play them again if I had them. When I was even younger (like maybe 4), I had an awesome baseball game where at each at-bat, you choose a level of difficulty and they give you an appropriate arithmetic problem. You get it right, you get a hit. You get it wrong, you're out. /No point to this post, just waxing nostalgic...

  25. Math Blaster FPS! by bobsacks · · Score: 2, Funny

    Too bad they didn't parter with ID to make a Math Blaster FPS. Or maybe an American McGee's Reader Rabbit.

    1. Re:Math Blaster FPS! by Musteval · · Score: 1

      Math blaster FPS, eh?

      "Look! A square root! Use the rocket launcher!"

      *BOOM*

      "Yeah! You blasted that math!" ...

      "Oh no! A math teacher! Use a boost to break through!" ...

      "Do a barrel roll!"

      --
      Note to mods: I'm probably being sarcastic.
  26. Right. by dzfoo · · Score: 2, Interesting
    'We're looking at developing some of the softer skills that are needed for the 21st century, such as problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration.'

    Right. Too bad they will be lacking in social skills and cultural values.

    But then again, he did say "needed for the 21st century"...

    -dZ.
    --
    Carol vs. Ghost
    ...Can you save Christmas?
    1. Re:Right. by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Bah! dont worry United States has been making its kids learn what they will need for this for some time now... just blow up things and kill "aliens" (in the broad sense of the word)... just a nice training.

      Procreation? moral values? ethics? ha... who needs that? /rant

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:Right. by goldspider · · Score: 1

      Not to mention mathematics, reading comprehension, history, civics, science. Once upon a time, those were taught in schools.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  27. Cue the "perennial dumbing down of America" posts by RealityProphet · · Score: 1

    Oh, wait....

  28. EA? by grasshoppa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Top three reasons why I don't want EA involved in this

    1) Homework will take 10 hours a night to complete, but "only during crunch time".

    2) There are always other students willing to participate in the program if you don't want to

    3) Students won't get extra credit, no matter HOW much homework they do

    On a more serious note, I've been saying for YEARS that we need to focus on these so called "softer" skills. Current education is too hooked on what a child knows and how well they can memorize, not how able they are to figure things out. I realize that the subjects are supposed to be vehicles to teaching these "softer" skills, the problem is many teachers don't. They teach facts to be memorized ( especially at the higher levels ), not concepts to be thought about.

    --
    Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    1. Re:EA? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Mech Eng at the University of Ottawa was nothing but 'here is a list of things, remember them'.

      Many classes were passed with a simple, but /programmable/ calculator...

    2. Re:EA? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Playing Electronic Arts games is just like homework already: doing the same thing over and over for several hours.

  29. You say "Homework" and they'll whine by TarryTops · · Score: 1

    Make learning interesting. Teahc them young to become great game developers. That's what you ought to do. Make them passionate about it not just experiment on them as guinea pigs!

    --
    Java Oracle Linux Enthusiast
  30. From by JustOK · · Score: 1

    from the 3 R's to the 4 buttons. How fundamentals have evolved

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  31. This is nothing new by Samir+Gupta · · Score: 1

    For schools, from a maintanance and TCO point of view, game consoles often prove to be financially more viable as a technology platform than PCs or Macs, very recently studies have shown, especially with the capabilities of the next generation.

    Even using older game consoles such as N64 and even SNES/SFC enables schools, particularly in rural areas, to immediately gain the benefits of technology without the cost and maintainence expense associated with traditional PC platforms.

    Nintendo have done a lot of research into uses of Nintendo consoles other than gaming, such as using it as a inexpensive terminal for Internet access, or more compellingly, education, and we have done preliminary work with various Chinese governmental bodies and NGOs to make games such as Super Marx Brothers and The Legend of Deng Xiaoping to teach Chinese youth in new and engaging dynamic ways.

    We look forward to seeing the results of this experiment in China, and will likely expand to other developing countries if it goes well.

    --
    -- Samir Gupta, Ph. D. Head, New Technology Research Group, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan.
    1. Re:This is nothing new by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      NGOs to make games such as Super Marx Brothers and The Legend of Deng Xiaoping to teach Chinese youth in new and engaging dynamic ways.

      Haven't you gotten tired of this yet, after 10 years? And I thought you were working for Sega?

  32. Skills... by Transcendent · · Score: 1

    We're looking at developing some of the softer skills that are needed for the 21st century, such as problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration.

    As well as shooting machine guns or plasma cannons while jumping 10ft in midair, jumping out of moving vehicles at 30mph to run into and fly a nearby helicopter, diffusing explosives with a pocket knife, commanding legions of foot soldiers while maintaining a productive economy, and of course... respawning.

  33. This isn't exactly new..... by 8127972 · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  34. I know two games I'd take to do this by Qbertino · · Score: 0

    'We're looking at developing some of the softer skills that are needed for the 21st century, such as problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration.'

    Tribes 2, CTF.
    Mind Rover for programming skills.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  35. What about human interaction? by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

    Is this going to take time away from human interaction, i.e. class discussions, teachers lecturing?

    1. Re:What about human interaction? by dakkon1024 · · Score: 1

      >Is this going to take time away from human
      >interaction, i.e. class discussions, teachers
      >lecturing?

      Come on now, even Logictec makes a headset for the Xbox

  36. Headshots for soft skills... :P by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Problem-solving... Get into difficult-to-reach sniper spot.

    Resilience... Survive long enough in difficult-to-reach sniper spot to make a difference.

    Persistence... Inflict as many headshots as possible without missing.

    Collaboration... Can someone get me some more sniper ammo?

    1. Re:Headshots for soft skills... :P by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Co-operation ... voting to have you kicked off the server for camping

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Headshots for soft skills... :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, Jack Thompson should be all over this. Letting CHILDREN play VIDEO GAMES?!?! Lawsuit filed.

    3. Re:Headshots for soft skills... :P by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      If the game has a sniper rifle and ideal sniping positions, it's not camping. I had to repeatedly remind my co-workers at Atari when we were testing UT 2004 that someone has to test the sniper rifle out and someone has to use the rocket launcher to flush me out. The fact I was using a female character (I'm a guy, BTW) probably didn't help. ;)

    4. Re:Headshots for soft skills... :P by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Whilst i was being a bit silly above , i do agree with you there.
      I have been very irritated at warnings given to me for camping(coincidentally on UT). Mostly followed by accusations of cheating , which i graciously responded to by switching weapons and winning the match the good old fashioned way , With a flak cannon .

      On better servers people instead of bitching about being killed , would use their heads and flush me out with the flak cannons secondary fire or a sniper rifle of their own .

      Now i can understand accusations of camping on a game like UT , which is after all an action based affair mostly . Though i have seen the same thing happen in tactical games , which really made me wonder if they accusers had any idea what the word "Tactics" meant (although trying to get someone good kicked off the server for camping is a sort of Machiavellian tactic).

      Though online team based FPS games do seem to be a good way for helping children develop communication skills , co-ordination skills and planing skills .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    5. Re:Headshots for soft skills... :P by NewStarRising · · Score: 1

      If there is a sniper rifle and places to snipe from, surely it IS camping?
      I'm not saying its good or bad, but isn't that what camping is? Settling down with a sniper rifle till someone walks past?

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    6. Re:Headshots for soft skills... :P by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 1

      Exactly why I prefer to play against bots (instead of 12 year olds!) or a cooperative game like Raven Shield.

      I grew up with two brothers that were just as competitive as me. We would fight over video games all the time. When I lost, I'd blame anything but myself - the game messed up, the controller is broken, the sun was in my eyes. Cooperative games, however, are a way to work with someone against a common enemy. Even if that enemy is another team (Halo CTF, for example) it's more fun because you know you're contributing to a group effort.

      Man, I miss Bubble Bobble.

    7. Re:Headshots for soft skills... :P by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Camping in my mind is sniping a spawn point or putting automatic turrets near a spawn point. Either way, the poor sucker spawning in gets it before realizing what's going on.

    8. Re:Headshots for soft skills... :P by NewStarRising · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sure, base-camping is not nice, if the poor new-spawn can't do anything before getting sniped.

      But then, my experience of online FPS is about 20 hours of Counterstrike: Source, 15hours of that on Dust2 map. 25 per team.
      Plenty of sniping, lots of grenades, and choice of weaponry.
      And I get BORED sniping. More fun to run around, shooting, retreating, grenading, than sit in one place looking at a cross-hair, waiting for a light pixel near the centre (piece of background in the far distance) to turn dark (Person). BANG. dang, missed.

      --
      b3 4phr41d 0f my 4bov3-4v3r4g3 c0mpu73r kn0wI3dg3!
      MadDwarf
    9. Re:Headshots for soft skills... :P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Persistence... Spawn camping

  37. Easy homework by mynickwastaken · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There will be some web sites filled up with cheats as well.

  38. Today's Assignment: Hit 2 German bunkers and MATH! by IcyNeko · · Score: 1

    Yay! I'd love to learn basic school skills while raiding Iraq, Germany, or Vietnam! Given that EA/Origin poopoo'd the Wing Commander projects, I'm sure the superior graphics and gameplay of UO will make total winners out of tomoorow's kids. Personally, I'd love to learn Calculus and Advanced Math by having the World of warcraft elves teach me. :D Hothothot!

  39. Why Johnny Can't Deduce by moviepig.com · · Score: 1
    We're looking at developing some of the softer skills that are needed for the 21st century, such as problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration.

    "Soft" skills? "21st century"? In which human-inhabited geologic era were such talents not a near-necessity?

    The project may prove valuable, but its mission seems the more commonplace one of sweetening a learning curve ...this time with the known seductions of a joystick...

    --
    Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
  40. Ender's Game? by edwardd · · Score: 1

    How long before educational games are networked & have psycological analysis built in?

  41. WTF? by ahhell · · Score: 1

    Geez and I always thought that TV rotten one's brain. I can't imagine what kind of zombies kids will be if they are "taught" by EA's shitty products. Yikes!! I think I would rather be on heavy doses of Ritalin than have to play Madden for hours on end. EA should rot in hell.

  42. Bad Idea by bizitch · · Score: 1

    Think of the boom in eyeglass salses - all those kids retina's trashed from video games AND homework.

    --
    ---- "Logoff! That cookie shit makes me nervous!" - A. Soprano
  43. Good for the kids. by RamboIII · · Score: 1
    Little Johnny, you still haven't cleaned your room, or taken out the garbage! What's the deal??

    Sorry mom, I'm doing my homework.

    But you've been doing it for 6 hours now, it's almost time for bed.

    Yeah yeah yeah ma, I gotta study for this test tomorrow. If I can't successfully beat the 4th level in 10 minutes, I have to repeat the 5th grade. You dodn't want THAT do ya?

    --
    Time is comparison of movement to other movement.
  44. Ack! I thought of this ages ago by Anonymous+Cowpat · · Score: 1

    I knew I should have gone down to the patent office instantly!

    My idea was to hand out copies of Diablo to the kids (possibly over the summer) and then give them all copies of Jarulf's Guide and set question such as what the probability of finding a specific unique item in one complete single player game, from a unique monster is. Requiring maths skills and the ability to locate and use the information given in the guide

    --
    FGD 135
  45. A Well Thought Out Reply by mister_llah · · Score: 1

    by Mister "The Yellow Dart" Llah

    Since maybe like the Middle Ages, there have been many differing opinions about hustle and bustle. This cannot be denied. It is my intention to sit down and play video games for several hours.

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  46. Games for Education by Hroth1 · · Score: 1

    I've got the "Educational" version of SimCity here. The pack contains the DOS software (I didn't say it was recent), schemes of work and photocopiable assignment worksheets. Its all good stuff!

    Most of the SIMxxx stuff was amenable to this approach, The value of the current trial would all depend on the games selected!

  47. When I was a child.... by kinglink · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We had many games that are "educational" the suprising thing though is these were well built games, and I believe the best ones came out of EGA (if I remember that company right) and EA. Carmen Sandiago anyone? I particularly liked the Super Solver series for their logic problems.

    If EA is making games for children that'd be great, but Video games for homework only works when we deal with games for learning. Madden isn't going to teach anyone that much except hand and eye coordination and how not to get your QB completely sacked (then again I have yet to learn that).

    All I hope is that they are as interesting and entertaining as the games in my youth, such as the typing games that had a car moving and the faster you typed the faster you went. Those games were entertaining to me, and kept my attention and taught me some spelling (though not that much) and typing.

    1. Re:When I was a child.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Madden isn't going to teach anyone that much except hand and eye coordination and how not to get your QB completely sacked (then again I have yet to learn that).

      I think the strategy online is to be Michael Vick and run around like a mad man. At least they fixed it in 06 so his passing ability sucks just like the real Michael Vick.

  48. Good--we need some teachers as admins by writertype · · Score: 1

    "Johnny1337, that's a wallhack! You're to sit over in that corner, by the crates. Johnny, put that sniper rifle DOWN!" ...

    "No, evilgrrl, that's spelled "dudes". There is no "z" in "dudes". How will you ever write for IGN if you can't spell correctly?" ...

    Look, BillyBadAzz, I know the pirates came and stole your isk. You need to tell them that that's wrong, and not let them do that to you. And Billy... Billy, that's a BAD WORD in your name. You change that right now! /kick

  49. They were doing something right back then. by CyricZ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People coming out of the 1920's education system were far smarter than what the system is producing now. They could actually read, write, and perform mathematics. Imagine that! Today you'll find many university-level students who struggle with such basic tasks.

    The strict discipline of the early 20th century gave children only one choice: to learn! And so they did.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    1. Re:They were doing something right back then. by Nutshell_TA · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it just that nowdays there are much more students then in 1920, because it became more basic to go to university, so now you also have more students with issues?

    2. Re:They were doing something right back then. by condour75 · · Score: 5, Informative
      People coming out of the 1920's education system were far smarter than what the system is producing now.
      Um. No they weren't. Literacy and intelligence have steadily gained since the 1870s.
    3. Re:They were doing something right back then. by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 1
      Today you'll find many university-level students who struggle with such basic tasks.


      Football players don't count as university-level students.
      The 20's system might have produced more students that could write formally, but I don't think it's fair to say "many" struggle with the tasks today.
      The ones that may struggle in one area are more likely to specialize in another...nothing wrong with that.
      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
    4. Re:They were doing something right back then. by Kiaser+Wilhelm+II · · Score: 1

      Its not the school's fault. The fault is our culture which embraces frivolity and meaninglessness. Culture has changed since then. It is oversimpliflying the issue to try to pin it down on one thing.

      Plenty of bright and intelligent people come out of our public school systems. Its hardly their fault if parents and students aren't doing their job.

      In fact, I would go so far to say that smart students learn better when they have LESS authoritarianism and more freedom to lean what they choose and however they wish.

      The reality is that you can't force people to learn any more than you can force people to be productive members of society (however you define that) or force them to be moral, ethical, etc.

      --
      Lord High Crapflooder The Right Honourable Vlad Craig Esther McDavenpherson III
      Destroyer of Mercatur.Net
    5. Re:They were doing something right back then. by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Honestly they were not , it's just that there is far greater accountability today and universities are far less restrictive.
        It only looks like the education system is worse because of the modern media .We are on mass far better educated than we were 76-85 years ago

        the strict discipline of the 1920s-50s(and beyond) did not help children learn . There are as many old ignoramuses as there are young ones .
      I would say that strict discipline unless self imposed is a hindrance to learning , Children must be taught to enjoy learning , this is vital . Beating them every time they speak out of term or fail a test is not going to gain you a love for learning .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    6. Re:They were doing something right back then. by hsmith · · Score: 1

      Before children were forced into schools, litercy rates were ~100%, now, they are no where near that leve. MA for on example, prior to forcing all children into school after the civil war had a rate of 99%, since it has never been above 91%.

      That is pathetic.

    7. Re:They were doing something right back then. by Choad+Namath · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many people even finished high school then? Both of my grandfathers dropped out of school after 8th grade (in the 1920s), and I'm sure that wasn't uncommon.

    8. Re:They were doing something right back then. by Flaming+Babies · · Score: 2, Interesting

      US literacy rates as reported by the census bureau:
      1900: 89%
      1910: 92%
      1920: 94%
      1930: 95%
      1950: 97%
      1960: 98%
      1970: 99%
      I guess MA is just behind the rest of the country.

      --
      The right to be heard does not automatically include the right to be taken seriously.
    9. Re:They were doing something right back then. by zentinal · · Score: 1
      "Before children were forced into schools, litercy rates were ~100%"
      Source please.
    10. Re:They were doing something right back then. by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 1

      Regrettably, the literacy data stops in 1979. It would be interesting to know how the trend evolves in the latest quarter century, ie. into the age of cable TV and mass advertising.

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    11. Re:They were doing something right back then. by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 1

      That's an average, a mean of the rate of literacy of the population. I think what the original poster was alluding to was the fact that the graduates of various educational institutions have gotten dumber, relatively speaking, since the 1920s.

      How could this be true, but with literacy *also* on the rise? Simple. More people have access to education nowadays, but that education is of lesser quality compared to the educations handed out during the early part of the 20th century.

      Want proof? Pick up something published before, say, 1970, and read it. I'll wager that you'll find a higher standard of writing, geared towards a much more literate audience. I've got a small pile of old how-to books about everything from photography to housework, and all of them are written in much more articulate language than almost anything I've seen in a bookstore in the past decade.

      Note: If you find problems with my writing, I apologize in advance, as I've been writing in pretty much nothing but Perl, C, and Japanese over the past few months, so my English has been suffering a bit.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    12. Re:They were doing something right back then. by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      Pfffft. I call BS on that one right out the gate.

      Could kids in the 1920s do anything as complex as using a computer? How about programming? What games did they play - hopscotch, checkers, tag? Anything even remotely as complex as Tetris, or Puyo Puyo?

      Kids these days are sifting, sorting and extracting meaning from games a million times as complex as a game of chess (look at the game-state-space of Civilisation, then chess, then STFU), all in realtime. They shift axiom- and rule-sets within minutes to play wildly different games, and train both their conscious mind and subsconscious mind to learn and react faster and in more complex ways than anything anyone would ever encounter in 1920. And they do it for fun.

      Mass-media like TV and the internet haven't destroyed out kids brains - our kids spend their lives immersed in a density of information that would give an elderly person a migraine, and don't even notice it.

      Since there is so much more information available, people have self-protectively started to reduce the depth they go into - they learn a little bit about a lot rather than everything about a tiny, tiny fraction of the available fields, then increase their knowledge of a particular field when they need to. We've stopped learning things by rote, and instead we're in the process of keeping most of our knowledge in external media, only loading it in (and often then temporarily) when we need it. How stupid is it for kids to spend a school career learning by rote the date of the Normandy Invasion, when they can hop on the web from their mobile phones and find out it was 1066?

      We should be teaching them how to use and understand technology, and how to do research, not reiterating the same educational techniques we used a hundred years ago, before the modern computer or the "information society" was even conceived of.

      Look at kids today - people claim they "have no attention span", and yet will still rag on them for "spending hours and hours playing that bloody computer game". Circle the two statements. Compare and contrast.

      Us adults have always had a go at the younger generation for being lazy, stupid, inattentive or backward - nostalgia's just not as good as it used to be. Here in the UK A-Level exams have been derided as "easier than they used to be" every single year of my adult life because pass-rates keep going up. Erm, no - kids have been getting more intelligent, generation-on-generation, ever since WWII at least.

      You're right, if you measure intelligence by the ability to spell well (when spell-checkers are becoming ever-nearer to ubiquity) or do mental arithmetic (when you're never, and I mean never more than five feet from some kind of calculator).

      However, half a century of psychological research seems to be tending away from such stone-age definitions involving specific single skills, and tending more towards general measures of information-sorting capability like progressive matrices tests.

      So yeah, sit a modern kid down in a bare room with one from the 1920s and ask them to do a 1920s task like work out 58*468 in their heads, and the 1920s kid will win. But I guarantee you, sit them down with calculators, and the modern kid will be finished before the 1920s kid has finished listening to the question.

      And (to be fair), also give them a modern task - sit both kids down in front of a computer and ask them to find out who's the current president of france, and the modern kid will be finished with the job before the 1920s kid has worked out how to use the mouse.

      Now granted, there are some skills that we're de-emphasising that I think we should spend more time on, and "reading and writing proper English" is one of them. However, using a single (non-essential) deficiency to claim that "all modern kids are stupid" is rosy-tinted nostalgia-lead BS at best.

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    13. Re:They were doing something right back then. by kartaron · · Score: 1

      Did you read your sources? One is a measure of IQ's which is not an accurate measure of an education system. The other is a measure of the overall population but does not address the fact that a significant portion of the population was not participating in the education system at the time.

      from Wikipedia:
      "by 1910, 72% of American children attended school"

      Around 30% of your literacy sample never attended school in the first place. They might have chosen not to, or had just recently immigrated but they never used the system in the first place.

    14. Re:They were doing something right back then. by Paul+Fernhout · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Try Gatto's writings:

      Cited:
      http://www.timboucher.com/journal/2005/07/25/gatto -on-literacy/

      Gatto says:
      http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/3j.htm
      http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/3b.htm
      (And so on).
      He cites military test results in particular.

      People used to learn the basics from their parents. Gatto and others like Holt argue it doesn't take more than a hundred hours or so of instruction for almost all kids to learn the basics of reading, writing and arithmetic, and then bootstrap from there on their own, once a kid actually decides they want to learn those things. The notion that it takes years of study is just self-justifying propaganda put out by the school system.

      Gatto writes: "Looking back, abundant data exist from states like Connecticut and Massachusetts to show that by 1840 the incidence of complex literacy in the United States was between 93 and 100 percent wherever such a thing mattered. According to the Connecticut census of 1840, only one citizen out of every 579 was illiterate and you probably don't want to know, not really, what people in those days considered literate; it's too embarrassing. Popular novels of the period give a clue: Last of the Mohicans, published in 1826, sold so well that a contemporary equivalent would have to move 10 million copies to match it. If you pick up an uncut version you find yourself in a dense thicket of philosophy, history, culture, manners, politics, geography, analysis of human motives and actions, all conveyed in data-rich periodic sentences so formidable only a determined and well-educated reader can handle it nowadays. Yet in 1818 we were a small-farm nation without colleges or universities to speak of. Could those simple folk have had more complex minds than our own?"

      --
      A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
    15. Re:They were doing something right back then. by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. Before schools, literacy rates were 100% only because they only polled the children of the wealthy, who had schools and private tutors. They didn't poll the rest because they didn't expect Joe Schmoe to read- he has no need to. Literacy rates were close to 0 in all other sectors of society. That is the way it always was in society, and the reason that scribes were so important. Schools, while nowhere near perfect, are a *vast* improvement to what we had before.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    16. Re:They were doing something right back then. by condour75 · · Score: 1

      The reason I included the IQ is because the previous comment had mentioned that people were "smarter", not making this distinction. And considering that the subject at hand is the potential of video games in education, I think referencing the flynn effect is germaine -- it's recently been suggested, with much publicity, that things like video games might be partially responsible for the effect.

      I'd be the first to admit that college standards have fallen in the humanities, where grade inflation runs rampant. But I strongly doubt that the good old days of corporal punishment and hazing had much to offer in the way of better pedagogy. A circa 1920s Harvard graduate could probably quote more Shelley, but I'd venture that his contemporary equivalent has a much better set of problem-solving skills.

      And I also strongly suspect that people throughout history have complained that "kids today are dumb."

    17. Re:They were doing something right back then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd log in but I can't be bothered.

      If you look farther back, to Hawthorne's work or Poe's you will find that they are even more complex. It's more a matter of erudition being valued more on its own merits and therefore people pushing farther and farther towards the limits of appearing this way than a matter of the content being more intellectually stimulating on its own.

      The reason many of these things seem more 'dumbed down' now is because their exceution in this way is less important. The complexity has moved to niches rather than being as mainstream.

      Plus, you're not looking at language as mutable, meaning some of the things from the fifties will APPEAR more complex while being nowhere near as complex, simply because you don't understand grampa's lingo perfectly

    18. Re:They were doing something right back then. by RogueLeaderX · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the big difference is that a greater % of people attend University (or college if you prefer.) This means that a greater % of the illiterate are attending University, especially as education become increasingly commoditized. 'Corporate' educators care more about your ability to pay tuition then your ability to add correctly. Fortunately, I do not think most universities are 'corporate' yet, but that could be my youthful optimism.

    19. Re:They were doing something right back then. by cnerd2025 · · Score: 1

      Apparently your data-collecting skills are comparable with those of the 1920's...and you have a vast internet in front of you! Today's education and societal problems are NO DIFFERENT from societal problems in history. Education is a smorgasbord of extremes. 30 years ago, emphasis was being placed on being together. Open classrooms (the ones with no walls) and things like that were concieved to "be in touch with everyone." It was a miserable failure. Noise was excessive, and soon false walls were added to maintain some semblence of order. In the early 1980s, the US Government published "A Nation At Risk," a document describing "inadequacies" of the education system. This led to the standards movement that we are (unfortunately) locked into today. It no longer matters that one learns *how* a mathematical problem is derived, but it is only important that sin^2(x) + cos^2(x) = 1. Also, the job market has significantly changed in the last 40 years. In 1960, 20% of men dropped out of high school to work in manual labor, and they could get a good job. Today, no one can get that kind of job if they drop out. Granted, the education system is short-sighted by promoting college for *all* students, but service jobs do require more skills than manual labor. One must read, write, do basic arithmetic, not to mention speak correctly. Today the system is flawed because of a) the public school system, and b) the lack of parental responsibility. School isn't meant to teach discipline/people skills/responsibility. My parents taught me those things (and to the misinformed reader who said that BS about being under 16, I am 16. You are more ignorant than brats whom you were talking about). My mother is a teacher and she deals with parents who absolutely refuse to accept that their children have discipline problems with responses such as "my baby would never do that!" Why are parents allowed to do this? Because stupid legislation like No Child Left Behind is allowed to pass. Teachers unaffectionately call it "no teacher left unscrewed." Among other insane provisions in the law, students who are for all intents and purposes vegetables must pass a test, even if they cannot coherently speak or read. Parents can move their children if the schools don't pass the accreditation ratings, yet the unaccredited schools happen to pull from poor and minority neighborhoods. How "coincidental" ::cough cough::. I am tired of the crap that they feed us at school. I am in all honors, "gifted", and AP classes. Our classes sometimes break the 30 students mark, far more than is conducive to successful education. Yet, to pass the tests, students who acheive lower on tests are put into classes with AVERAGE sizes of about 12. Is this right at all? Who will be more productive in society? That sounds harsh, but in all honesty, which group has more potential for growth? Part of the problem is that we think that "all people can acheive if they work hard." To a degree this American ideal is correct, but acheiving academically is not the goal. Academia should NOT be an end to itself. Someone mentioned that they have not used the algebra or trig they learned in high school. Being a student who enjoys math immensely, I can determine what it is used for. But it frustates me to no end how teachers teach it. "OK, the standard formula for a parabola is Ax^2 + By + C = 0," as if Sir Isaac Newton just looked in a book when he invented Calculus. What's the purpose of learning math? Learning logical thinking skills! But in many respects, standards is killing that. Classes such as algebra, trig, and geometry are simply excercises in wasting time. Science should be about satisfying curiousity. Instead most science stifles curiousity because of the "dry" subject matter. All of these things considered, I think the biggest problem is that the *parents* are apathetic about school. I think the children who do poorly in school have parents who do not encourage it. They have this "I didn't do well in school so you don't have to" idea. They may say "do as I say, not as I do,

    20. Re:They were doing something right back then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would help your argument if you were using paragrpahs.

    21. Re:They were doing something right back then. by hplasm · · Score: 0

      Breathe, dammit!!

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    22. Re:They were doing something right back then. by zentinal · · Score: 1

      Interesting. Gatto seems to be an anti compulsary public schooling activist. I don't know if I trust his interpretation of the data. I'd rather see the data and know exactly how he interpreted it and reached his conclusions.

  50. I've been saying and doing this for YEARS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it doesn't work though...

  51. Sorry I can't resist... by Andrewkov · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, your homework plays YOU!

  52. Old is new again by couch · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is nothing new, until the Windows platform completely wiped out the homegrown competition, we always had educational games in schools in the UK. Companies like Sherston, 4Mation and others released loads of 'games' for schools. Googling about now, I've found a few of the old-skool education games still knocking aroung (for example Granny's Garden), and some others that never seem to have made the jump from the 8 bit days (like Suburban Fox).

    Some of the games that were created back in the 90s were very closely tied in with specific National Curiculum targets, and still manages to be quite fun to play - albeit made on quite a small budget, with the sort of money that EA has to throw at production, these new generation of education games could be really good.

  53. GvR sounds like a good idea by pdamoc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://gvr.sourceforge.net/ is an interesting concept to build upon.

  54. the response by justforaday · · Score: 1

    "But Mooooommmmmm...I don't want any hot coffee right now..."

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  55. Play games, but keep them away from GameFAQs! by CyricZ · · Score: 1

    If they let these children play games, they should also make sure they keep them away from the GameFAQs.com forums. Frankly, I think such forums are destroying the minds of youth all over the world.

    My grandson pointed out to me the horrible grammar and spelling of most young people there. He has decent communication skills, and he found it very funny how poorly some of the fools there wrote. GameFAQs is anti-education: it makes young people stupider.

    --
    Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  56. I see no reason why this can't work by WidescreenFreak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Depending on how it's implemented, I see no reason why games can't be developed that either (A) require a printout when a student completes a level/course to prove that it was done or (B) reports back to central repository so that the teacher can determine if the work was done.

    So, for example, a student plays a game that deals with the multiplication tables. The game is entertaining and informative at the same time, so the kid enjoys playing it. Once the "work" level has been "won", out goes a signal (or a report) stating that little Johnny has completed the work. The teacher has proof that the game was played and little Johnny had fun with it to the point that he looks forward to the next assignment. I don't see this as being difficult to achieve, nor to I believe that this is something that is unattainable as TFA suggests.

    Obviously, there are technical issues with this (being cynical geeks we can always find flaws), but I don't see any reason why this could not be done to the point that video games, classwork, homework, and education are synonymous.

    So, let's see. A boring book or a complete multimedia experience. Gee, which one do you think the kids will want more? Apparently, the cynics here have not heard of the still-popular Reader Rabbit series.

    And give Taco some slack. After years of having to deal with "All Your Base Are Belong To Us" derivative posts on Slashdot, it was only a matter of time before that type of fractured grammar became a part of the Slashdot mentality. :)

    --
    The Overrated mod is for reversing inappropriate, positive mods, not for voicing disagreement with a post.
  57. Dance Dance Gym Class by Travelsonic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They should go to Konami for games they could use in gym class. Last time I checked, Dance Dance Revolution is one helluva addicting, and sweat inducing game even when you are not in workout mode.

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  58. My homework was to watch "Tron" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was in Comp. Sci back in the 1980s, I was lucky enough to be taking computer graphics when Tron came out and the prof told us the homework was to go to the theatre and watch "Tron" and be prepared to discuss it next class!
    Cool.

    TDz.

  59. Conversation Leaked From EA HQ!! by Quick+Sick+Nick · · Score: 5, Funny

    Computer games giant Electronic Arts and education IT researcher NESTA Futurelab, are to conduct trials to see how computer games can be used as educational tools in schools.

    Sales Rep: Sir! We have a problem, no one is buying our shitty games!

    CEO: Hmmmm.... is it because 25 of our last 26 games have been sequals?

    Sales Rep: That's part of the problem, sir, but all of our games contain a copious amount of um, shit.

    CEO: Interesting. We need a new market approach.

    Sales Rep: Sir?

    CEO: We sell our games to schools, and say they our educational!

    Sales Rep: Brialliant!

    CEO: We have to make sure they buy our utter crap too, so let's say "all our genres have something to offer"...

    Sales Rep: Oh Sir, the school districts will love it! I'll get the board on the phone right away. Hello Add'em '06!

  60. & we wonder why ADD is prevalent in children t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone who is for this really needs to read High-tech Heretic by Clifford Stoll. Stoll was one of the early pioneers of DARPANET and has become a ferocious opponent of hte widespread use of computing technology in education.

    When I went to school, we had to do work the old-fashioned way. With a pencil and paper, sitting hours in front of a book and developing critical thinking skills the right way. In this ADD-age, people are looking for instant gratification... guess what, the only graitification you are supposed to receive from education is moving on to the next problem!

    What do you think playing videogames for homework will do for this children? They are more likely to blindly punch in numbers/words without understanding the concept behind them to access the animation/mini-game. In other words, the most important part of education: critical thinking skills, will be lost.

    I, for one, say we need to throw all computers out of the classroom and teach the old-fashioned way. Hell, ADD was used to describe something in Math as opposed to a drug-company-invented-disorder when I was in school.

  61. If you want to teach resilience by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2, Funny

    just hire some kids to be bullies to pick on the kids every day. Either that, or disable "God mode" in Doom.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  62. Soft skills by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1
    ...such as problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration

    You know, I learn't all these when I was young too. The difference being that I did it in a group of people which meant that I also learn't how to listen properly, empathise with others, social skills, a sense of achievement and made a few friends to boot.

    Seriously, I know computer games aren't soley single player these days, but I can't help thinking that there are far better and cheaper ways to teach all this and more and also don't help further a corporations goals (EA doing this out of the goodness of their hearts? I think not) without going near a computer.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  63. As opposed.. by BlackCobra43 · · Score: 1

    to now, with sites giving cliff notes and sometimes entire written reports?

    I remember a survey that was a done a few years ago found that somewhere around 60% of American students admitted to having cheated at some point. I don't see how this could be worse, as most game cheats are easily detectable, certainly more so than detecting a duplicate essay.

    --
    I never spellcheck and I freely admit it. Save your karma for more worthwhile "lol erorrs" replies
  64. A bad idea IMO by Drasil · · Score: 1

    I have 3 kids at school in the UK, I went to school here myself, my father worked in an FE college and both his parents were school teachers. From what I know of the education system here this sounds like a terrible idea.

    Schools here in the UK have changed a lot in the past few decades. In recent years the politicians have been trying the same privatisation-by-stealth tactics they are using on the health service, this sounds like the latest. I don't think what we are seeing here is a leap forward in computer aided learning, more like the latest way to give taxpayers money to some corporation.

    More worrying is the quality of education my kids seem to be getting. #2 daughter would like to learn latin, but it's not taught. At least she could take a qualification in "consumer and lifestyle studies" if she wants.

  65. My two cents by 0110011001110101 · · Score: 1
    My daughter has one of those vSmile gaming systems, and games are available for different age groups and learning levels... in her particular case, they seem to work well in teaching her counting, letters, and now as she gets older, reading and math.

    Fortunately for my wife and I, my daughter has always been a bit of a bookworm and has loved to learn new things, and has picked them up rather quickly. I think it's her insatiable desire to keep learning that makes these games fun for her, the same as it makes actual reading, puzzles and math type written exercises fun for her... on the other hand had she not exhibited these sort of qualities naturally or through our prodding, I'm not entirely convinced that these sort of electronic games would hold any sort of interest for her any more than the old manual style of learning would.

    Unfortunately I think this is just EA capitalizing on yet another market they can tramatize their employees with and fatten the pockets of their execs with... Natural curiousity and good parenting will never be trumped by the newest educational tech gadget...

    --
    Don't anthropomorphize computers: they hate that.
  66. Chances are it won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don Landcaster has for years been a prolific writer on electronics and inventing. His rule of thumb when evaluating the probability that something is worth working on was something like: "How long have people been trying to solve this problem?" If people have been working on something for a long time without much luck then your chances of success are poor. /www.tinaja.com/

    People have been trying to produce educational games that would capture the interest of students for the last thirty years. There hasn't been much success yet so I don't hold up much hope for this one.

    Can students learn by playing games? Absolutely. We used to call it phys ed. Does that still exist? I have also seen it work with video games. I have watched a room full of students play Doom or ROT over the network. The rugged individual who didn't want to cooperate always got clobbered by a couple of guys who teamed up. So, students can learn teamwork playing video games.

  67. Sample educational game by geekwithsoul · · Score: 5, Funny

    You are in a 21st Centurty school, your teachers are underpaid, the facilities are obsolete, your fellow students are apathetic. It is dark. There is a computer in front of you.

    >>turn on computer

    The computer is on.

    >>play educational game

    You are distracted by the bright colors and cool sound effects. You are supposedly learning problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration; skills for which there is no test to measure your progress. You graduate.

    >>get job

    Your attempt to get a job fails. It is dark.

    >>get job

    Your attempt to get a job succeeds! You are now a fry cook at McDonalds.

    >>get better job

    Your attempt to get a better job fails. Your education never prepared you with either the intellectual tools or actual knowledge to succeed. You have no health care, you don't vote, and your kids will turn out even worse than you. Oh, and you've been eaten by a grue.

    Your dead

    1. Re:Sample educational game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your dead

      Oh dear, if the educational games are going to include spelling as bad as that, then, speaking as the human race*, we may well be soon.

      *something I have no right to do, though as an Anonymous Coward I represent the human race better than anyone with an account ;)

    2. Re:Sample educational game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The spelling seems fine, it's the grammar that's lacking.

    3. Re:Sample educational game by not-enough-info · · Score: 2, Funny
      Damnit! I was just getting into this game.
      Your dead

      My dead what???

      Damn you EA! DAAAAAAMMMMMN YOU!!!!!
      --
      ---k--
      </stupid>
  68. It's been done before by 06metzp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As I recall, this has been done already... when I was in kindergarten (circa 1993), we had two or three old Apple IIe computers in the classroom and we were on a scheduled rotation so that every week or so every kid would get a chance to play with it for a period of time. As educational games were the only ones available (at least to us), we were learning while we played. I loved playing and always looked forward to it. Number Munchers and Word Munchers were excellent games (among many others) and I still pull out the ol' IIe from time to time to revisit some old games that were truly educational. (This is not to say my education hasn't advanced since Kindergarten, but my future children will definitely be playing some of those same games if they still work by then)

    --
    This sig left blank for page turns.
  69. Missing key by RyoShin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'We're looking at developing some of the softer skills that are needed for the 21st century, such as problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration.'

    And, in the back of the package, in small print: Social skills not included.

    1. Re:Missing key by vga_init · · Score: 1
      And, in the back of the package, in small print: Social skills not included.

      Explain how bookwork is different in that respect.

      People with poor social skills have a greater tendency to do better in academics, and these games are designed for academics. Social skills aren't really much of a priority, but it did mention "collaboration."

  70. Reminds me of my homework at the university... by TERdON · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reminds me of my homework at the university, which I had at the beginning of this semester. It was to watch animated movies (ie Toy Story etc). Ok, the course was on computer graphics and animation, but anyway...

    --
    I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
  71. Re:it could be worse; imagine Squaresoft games by Psykechan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Alright class, your homework for this weekend is to finish Squaresoft's Final Math Fantasy. It's an 80+ hour game with plenty of repetitious "math battles" and I want your Memory Card (8MB) (for Playstation 2) on my desk Monday morning.

    We had this sort of thing in my time. We called it edutainment and it wasn't that popular then either.

  72. Yes I've said it before by amliebsch · · Score: 1

    Grand Theft Auto: Mathmagic Land

    --
    If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
  73. move! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    These skills can also be acquired through athletics, or the physical and artistic discipline of dance. Which might help us stop raising generations of overweight kids who grow into chronically obese adults, in sedentary jobs with all the attendant health problems (mental and physical), who are barely aware that they have bodies, much less how to use or take care of them.

  74. PyGame by Yazheirx · · Score: 1

    PyGame is just what I was looking for. I have an 11 year old that is looking to make video games on his laptop (an old Pentium 120 that a client of mine gave me).

    I started him on Q Basic such that he could start to think logically, understand subroutines and variables and the other basics. I was going to have him move to Java next, but I knew that it would be difficult for him to do much graphically. This looks like something that might just fit the bill.

    Other suggestions from other /. parents are welcome

    --
    More of my thoughts
  75. Is this really a good thing? by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

    What happens when these kids get out into the workforce and their boss expects them to do the job even when they aren't being entertained and stimulated.

    Are we going to have to turn every job into a video game in order to keep the workforce of the future working?

    --
    Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
  76. Dear me by Goodgerster · · Score: 1

    In China, roads are diverted, sirens are disabled and policemen patrol the roads outside of institutions to ensure that sixteen-year-olds can take their secondary examinations in peace, without interruptions.
    In Britain, we are given weekly cash to stay on after GCSE, and some of the more chavvy students have to be bribed with iPods to take their GCSEs in the first place!
    And now, Americans want to bring in video games to help keep their mentally subnormal children entertained while homeworking! We learn best with teachers who are quietly authoritative, who can keep everyone quiet but not bored. Return to the thirties' public schools, I say.

  77. you mean like... by 5plicer · · Score: 1
    --
    The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
  78. I learned everything I know from consoles by Lunchbox777 · · Score: 1

    Video games have been my homework for years, sure they had all that other stuff but it doesn't teach the essential skills in life. Where else can you learn: 1.) To reach high ledges you must simply jump twice, once on the ground and another time once you're in the air. 2.) Money can be accumulated not only through real world earnings and jobs, but also by defeating the many monsters who ravage the forests and tall grass of our world. 3.) If you are lacking in strength, speed, or endurance, there is always a shirt, pair of pants, and/or pair of boots that can remedy this situation. 4.) The ninja profession has become one of the most competative job markets available out there, only the strong, quick, and intelligent will survive (see above if your lacking in some of these necessary skills).

  79. Homework should be abandoned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I get home from work I'm off duty - It should be the same for the kids. There ought to be a sharp line dividing private time with work time.

    A day in school can be quite stressing and when you get home to your even more stressed parents getting homework done can be an absolute drag for the student and sheer horror to endure for the parents who have been slaving their day away at some factory or in some office.

    It would be healthy for the education of kids if their actual learning abilities were trained in school where teachers are able to monitor their ability to learn.

    Solitary study assignement should be something only older students had to go through and only in order to see if the student was able to think for him/her self and able to retrieve and process information on a given subject - solving whatever assignment.

    Learning belongs in the school and so does the testing of those abilities (i.e. homework)

    However the concept of using games to hone individual abilities is not to be frowned at, and as such I don't mind educational games - Especially since learning through play can be exceptionally effective. I would however like to see homework abandoned - Perhaps a few extra hours in school could be appropriate, so that assignments could be handled within reach of professional help.

    On the other hand soon there ought to be no need for schools as a physical place as remote education is quite possible. I do however believe meeting up IRL in different environments and working or RL useful assignments would be very beneficial for our youth.

    Myself - I'm heading off back to school while working full time at the same time, so the next couple of years will be tough... Yuck homework on the horizon.

    Imagine, going back to school adding to the 13 years already served on the bench, and that after almost 20 years "on the market"... phew!

  80. Of course by papasui · · Score: 1

    Because exactly what we need is ways to make our children use the computer for more hours a day. How about better social interraction.

  81. Wow, talk about a grudge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some mod just wasted all of his mod points on these posts to bring them down. Hah.

  82. Re:I believe this to be the future of education by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

    I have to point out that this has been a problem for time immemorial. Every generation feels like things are horrible now and there was reasonable discipline and order in the past. The following observation was made more than 2 millenia ago, which tends to suggest that generations of kids don't really change all that much over time (and neither do grown ups):

    Children today are tyrants. They contradict their parents, gobble their food, and tyrannize their teachers.
        - Socrates

  83. Solid Research Behind This by McLuhanesque · · Score: 1

    There is actually some solid and serious research behind this initiative, and other similar projects that are pushing the traditional boundaries of education. I've commented on it here, with links to the research, theory and project pages.

    The historical fact is that our current educational system is only about 350 years old, give or take a decade. Prior to that, what was considered knowledge, appropriate pedagogy, and educational techniques were considerably different, and different still compared to the same items in ancient Greece. With the fundamental changes that are occuring in many aspects of our contemporary societies, radical new approaches to education are not only to be expected, but are to be welcomed.

    Besides, has anyone considered the idea that the current dysfunction among modern corporations, and the plethora of McJobs may be a direct outcome of a now obsolescent educational system - one that served the industrial age well, but is sadly outdated today?

  84. What's really going on... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is that the teachers are fed up with their workload for $h|+ pay and are going to be turning their classrooms into gold farming communes on MMORPGs.

    They can monitor the kids keyboarding skills, grammar, spelling (no spell checkers to help out!), collaboration, etc. Toss in an occasional applied math problem ("Armor A has +15 stam and +8 agi; B has +6 stam, +9 agi and +8 str -- which is better for me?") and pretty soon all of the kids will have the skills necessary to be contestants in the CPL. Or at least work in an asian gold-farming shop.

    Meanwhile, the virtual teachers reap the profits, sell them on Ebay and triple their monthly incomes...

  85. the proplem is... by adnausium · · Score: 1

    i dont know how it happened, or exactly when...but at some point it became cool to be as stupid as possible. We are not talking basic geek and jock crap...we are talking about kids really believeing they are cool amungst thier peers, for knowing as little as possible about anything & everything. Its sickening. I long for the days when an ignorant rebelious teen, still tried to stay in school and graduate with some "edjumakation". We are supposed to be rearing our children, preparing them for adulthood, not catering to their every want & desire. Parents are affraid to be parents these days. Here's a hint: if ur kid back talks you, yells at you, disobeys you; here is what you do: BEAT THE LIVING TAR OUT OF THEM. My mother carried a wooden spoon in her purse everywhere we went (even church) till i was about 7 or 8 years old. When i hit my teens i pretty much had figured out who was in charge. Love your children. Teach your children. But dont idolize them. Here's what I mean: this running trend now that every ones a winner, everyone gets a ribbon, there are no losers, all about saving face for your child...its all a crock of sh*t!! In life there are hardships, sometimes you lose, some times life hurts. Dont coddle your children, because you are f*ckin up their heads.

    --
    Don't ya hate it when the correct spelling of your favorite screen name is taken?
    1. Re:the proplem is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, my Mom used to beat me witha wooden spoon too, but I got even with her now that she's old and feeble... heh, heh, heh...

  86. New homework excuses by servognome · · Score: 1

    "My dog unplugged the controller"
    "My little brother kept TKing me"
    "Power was out"
    "My dad put a virus on my comp"
    "This game gives me seizures"
    "I'll never use this in the real world"

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  87. Re:I believe this to be the future of education by ryanov · · Score: 1

    That may be... however I know of a lot of kids where they say "oh, he just won't do his homework." It's usually the parents who are at fault. One extreme example is from one of those Nanny 911 type shows: the kids won't eat dinner, but they have unfettered access to a snacks closet. Hello?

    Maybe it's just that the few of us who had decent parents are looking around at the rest of the world and saying "these kids today." No idea.

  88. I had a brick to play with. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. What's with these pussy parents? When I was a kid, my dad gave me a brick to play with. If I complained about the brick, he'd drop-kick me in the throat and I'd realize what an ungrateful little shit I was being.

    Kids these days. Feh!

  89. they hate our freedom by Psionicist · · Score: 1
    Children nowadays are given more and more freedom and less and less resonsponsibilites. You can get away with pretty much anything short of murder if you're under 16. What are parents getting in return in order to combat this? Well they're told that it's not their responsibility, and this is reinforced over and over. For those that realise that this is completely stupid and dare actually try and rase their child sensibly, they're attacked for doing so.
    The parents hate our freedom!!1

    It's a joke, laugh.
  90. Qualification of EA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... along with Electronic Arts (the software game giant) "

    is akin to stating:
    "... along with Microsoft (the software giant) "

    or
    "... along with an iPod (the mp3 player) "

    I suppose it's to be expected on a CmdrTaco story.

  91. New EA employees.... by trmcdougle · · Score: 1

    Since everyone who already plays computer games knows that EA are slave drivers, they are trying to generate a new group that don't know that?

  92. Game Playing as a Skill by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Increasingly, Computer Game Playing (or, rather, Computer manipulation) is becoming a skill of some importance. For example, there was a recent article in the Washington Post about Coal Mining in Virginia:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/artic le/2005/08/14/AR2005081401174.html

  93. It's all a big conspiracy I tell you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If video games become part of the school curriculum then kids wont think that they're cool any more and wont want to play them. Much in the same way that English class crushed any possible enjoyment kids might have had from a classic piece of literature.

    Getsome, Rockstar!

  94. Dear Slashdot Editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your homework is Write Bad English.

  95. It's just the next "Carmen San Diego" by zarmanto · · Score: 1
    I don't exactly see how this is such earth shattering news. The United States Army is using a first person shooter for much the same purpose (although, admittedly with the very specific agenda of recruiting our youth, of course) and Broderbund has done this for years with Carmen San Diego, Oregon Trail and other titles, so why would it be so surprising that another big video game house might experiment within the educational market as well?

    So this might well be A Good Thing(tm), as it brings a fresh infusion of programming talent into the educational software arena, but it's not exactly shocking news.

  96. 10 years ago... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used computers and software that taught persistence, team work, problem solving and resiliance... It was called Mathematica, oh, and I got one heck of a lesson in Calculus while I was at it!

  97. 21st Century Skills? by mb12036 · · Score: 1

    Wow, I didn't know that problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration were skills we didn't need in the 20th Century.

  98. Holy backlash batman by loose_cannon_gamer · · Score: 1
    After reading this page's comments (at least, the filtered ones), I am stunned by the overwhelmingly negative response to this idea. I generally think of the slashdot crowd as reasonably open minded freethinking creative types, but wow, not on this issue.

    Aside from the fact that EA is involved, and most modern games probably aren't the way to go, what is wrong with this idea?

    I think that most rational people agree with the claim that learning something using fun method A is better than learning the same thing with boring method B. If all else is equal, then absolutely, use method A, having fun while learning is much more likely to lead to positive results.

    So the root assumption I'm getting from most posts today is, in fact, nothing useful can be learned from fun video games, and they bring a host of bad lessons. Is the problem of creating a fun game (hard) that also teaches a valuable lesson (moral / arithmetical / logical / etc.) (hard) a completely intractable problem? I don't think it is.

    So if it is likely possible to make fun games that will benefit today's kids, why is that inherently a bad idea?

    Don't get me wrong, I can easily see where the idea could be made to go wrong (and many have pointed out some of the pitfalls). But overall, if this idea was well executed, I think it has great potential.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, us are belong to all your base.
  99. Actually we did that in highschool by drgonzo59 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Back in Russia in early 1990's we had just got a new classroom with IBM computers. The computer science (we called it 'informatics') teacher let us play Sokoban and Lemmings for a grade. It was really fun, made you think logically, and gave the teacher time to go out and run errands and take smoke breaks. A win-win situation if you ask me ;)

  100. Re:it could be worse; imagine Squaresoft games by generic-man · · Score: 1

    Aw man, can't I just upload it using my Sony Network Adapter (Ethernet/Modem) (for PlayStation® 2)? I'm running out of space on my Sony Memory Card (8MB) (for PlayStation® 2).

    --
    For more information, click here.
  101. games work in education if you use them right... by peaceful_bill · · Score: 1

    I've been quite involved in games in education. I am an elementary school computer teacher, and use a variety of COTS games to support learning in my school. Here's the address to my blog where I've discussed this stuff:

    http://www.mackenty.org/index.php/learn/games_work

    The key is, of course, not to stick a kid in front of a computer game for an hour, and hope for a miracle. It won't happen.

    In order for games to work in education we need active engagement, kids need to think about what they are doing. This requires a more sophisticated approach to teaching than the old "drill and kill". It also requires assessment that isn't a state-sponsored "fill in the oval" test.

    I've written about this very thing, and I use several games in my classroom. There is fantastic potential for games in education.

  102. My English lessons by ehiris · · Score: 1

    It really works. I learned my first English installing, executing, and playing the original Leisure Suit Larry games.

    For example I now know to take the cab to the Convenience Store and ask for a condom (the word lubber worked too) before fucking a prostitute.

  103. Why am I not surprised... by Adammil2000 · · Score: 1

    that EA is sponsoring this?

    Of course, EA is well known for it's educational games. Sounds more like Pepsi sponsoring drink vending machines in schools to me...

  104. Re:I believe this to be the future of education by Miaowara_Tomokato · · Score: 1

    And what happens when they internalize this lesson, and then generalize the idea as they grow up? In twenty years, you have a large, human-looking animal.

    Pain is the quickest and easiest solution for a parent, but it is not the most effective (i.e., long-lasting) training option. In order of efficacy (from memory, so correct with a cited source if I'm wrong), the best training methods are:

    Positive Reinforcement:
    Giving subject something they like after exhibiting desired behavior (e.g., candy bar)
    Positive Punishment:
    Giving subject something they don't like after exhibiting behavior to be extinguished (e.g., sharp smack to rump)
    Negative Punishment:
    Taking away something disliked by subject after exhibiting desired behavior (e.g., extend curfew for good grades)
    Negative Reinforcement:
    Inverse of the above (e.g., grounding)

  105. Seen it by TheDarkRogue · · Score: 1

    They tried this at a district in the Pittsburgh area. They got a grant to use the students as rats, and gave every student in the test grade a PS1 (Before the PS2 came out) and the in school ciriculum was designed around the educational games provided with it. The program was an absolute failure. Now the school district has several thousand PS1s in nice leather cases sitting in various bins throughout the basements of the schools. The kids mostly took them home and then just rented/bought games for them. The district is now holding onto them waiting for them to be completly worthless before they put them up for auction.

    --
    (Score:0, Interesting)
  106. And the real Irony... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Your attempt to get a job succeeds! You are now a fry cook at McDonalds. ....Oh, and you've been eaten by a grue.

    The real irony here is the grue had already eaten someone else and would have passed the poor player by, except he smelled irresistably of fries and the grue just could not resist a bite or two.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  107. EA homework by radu124 · · Score: 1

    Somehow, I forsee a decrease in computer games popularity. But I guess EA didn't think of that.

    What will the kids of the future tell you when you ask them about games?

    "Games? Oh yeah, I hate them. We have them for homework."

  108. Typing of the Dead by computechnica · · Score: 1

    Typing of the Dead blends horror with a typing tutorial for an original gaming experience. There are several game modes to help you become a terrific typist. Drill mode focuses on different skills, such as typing speed, accuracy, reflex, and special keystrokes. In the boss mode, your battle against each boss emphasizes a different skill, from quick reading and answering to story reading and typing. Two-player modes include cooperative and competitive.

    This game was the reason I bought 2 keyboards for my Dreamcast. My kids will play this before Mavis Beacon Typing.

  109. Online Encyclopedias and Games by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I probably learnt alot of more by reading/using Wikipedia than going to school. :)

    I think online encyclopedias are very important, in school you dont know what there is to learn and you have to learn predefined subjects. On an online encyclopedia its endless big and you can read about pretty much everything, then in the article it contains link to other related articles which make you click there and read that and gain interest in something different. It is really great, I love online encyclopedias, it is the best thing ever. So great for learning.

    Games might be useful too, imagine an entertaining game made in an way that inspires people but to progress you must solve things and educate yourself to figure out things. Then that maybe could teach people who played those games alot.

  110. New Idea? by pinkstuff · · Score: 1

    Okay, so I'll be first to admit I havn't read TFA - but I didn't want to either; I lost interest as soon as I read 'new program idea to use video games for educational use'.

    I remmember playing educational games on the old Amiga's and such when I was a kid, in fact, if I recall correctly, a heck of a lot of the games back then had some sort of educational value to them. I don't know how much they taught me, but my interest in them could well have led me on the path to becomming a programmer.

    1. Re:New Idea? by pinkstuff · · Score: 1

      In fact, I would take this a bit further and say that games are generally designed as learning tools (fun being the main ingredient). Board games, kids school yard games, AND computer games. MHO anyway.

  111. You brought back some memories... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    The days of Number Munchers, Math Shop, Writer Rabbit and CrossCountry USA (sp?) were a golden age. I played all of those and more in elementary school, and I feel they made me better at computing (and math, and reading, and geography) than most around me.

    I deeply miss those games. Windows is a good gaming platform now, but the Apple ][e was teh pwn at that stuff back then.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  112. And your homework by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And your homework is learn about infinitives.

  113. YOUR homework is Learn Proper Grammar by riker1384 · · Score: 0

    Tonight you are expected check if headline might be missing the word "to." Please learn write proper English.

  114. Forget EA... by cobras2 · · Score: 1

    "problem-solving, resilience, persistence and collaboration.' ".... hey, Zork! or.. a MUD?

    --
    Early bird may get the worm.. but the second mouse gets the cheese.
  115. hello 1985 by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

    Hello 1985. We want our Carmen Sandiego and Supermunchers back.
    -l

    p.s., We were using those for learning in our elementary school circa 1987. Supermunchers ruled. I have a floppy image of both I load up in Dosemu every now and then. Good times.

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  116. Re:I believe this to be the future of education by confused.brit · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah, I'm sure in Socrates' day the kids were bringing a gun to school & blowing their classmates/teachers away because they just didn't like doing homework/were being bullied. I'm sure that kids in Socrates' day were doing drugs and sniffing glue. And what about the whole vandalism? Did Roman kids write 'Romanes eunt dommum' on the walls? (outside of 'The Life of Brian') Get real. The world is on a downward spiral, and only a firm hand with the kids is going to settle it. And no, I'm not going to AC. Flamebait or not, it needs to be said.

    --
    Sigs are for wimps
  117. Previous games in school uses by jkirriemuir · · Score: 1
    There's a growing body of evidence and examples from the last few years of purely commercial / entertainment computer and video games being used in the classroom for curriculum-related reasons.

    There's some in this 4Mb Powerpoint presentation: http://www.bris.ac.uk/education/research/networks/ gern/gdc05.ppt

    A few more in my lickle blog of examples: http://silversprite.blogspot.com/

    The "games in education" research sector has generally moved on from the question of "Can games be of use in curriculum-based learning?" (answer: yes - look at the examples), and is looking more at "Which games?", "How?", and "What support do educators need to make the best use of them?". The EA / FutureLab linkup will be looking at these three.