Slashdot Mirror


Apple Rumored to Be After Samsung Flash Memory

Steve Nixon writes "An unconfirmed report today from Reuters quotes an industry analyst firm iSuppli as saying that Apple plans to buy as much as 40 percent of Samsung's second-half flash memory output. The NAND flash memory cards will be used in a new, 4 GB iPod Mini, which Apple would release in time for the holiday shopping season, the report stated. The current version of the 4 GB mini contains a hard drive. Apple's iPod Shuffle uses flash memory."

274 comments

  1. Very good news by ChrisF79 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Flash memory is going to do wonders for both battery life and size. Maybe I'll buy one of the new iPod minis if the rumors are true.

    --
    Finance tutorials and more! Understandfinance
    1. Re:Very good news by mhore · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Flash memory is going to do wonders for both battery life and size. Maybe I'll buy one of the new iPod minis if the rumors are true

      Absolutely -- but I just have to wonder why they'd want to move the mini to flash. Battery life -- sure. But size? Wouldn't they just end up with an iPod shuffle with a screen? Maybe they're just going to discontinue the 4 gb mini and introduce a 4 gb shuffle (since the largest mini is currently 6 gb). Who knows... ;)

      Mike.

      --

      Mmmm......sacrelicious.

    2. Re:Very good news by milimetric · · Score: 1, Insightful

      what I don't understand is this. One of these little flash cards is like 4 GB but it's also VERY SMALL. So... why not put like 5 of them in an iPod Mini and get the fucking competition over with.

      I for one welcome our new short sighted flash enabled overlords.

    3. Re:Very good news by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The mini could be slightly smaller without reducing the UI size, if the hard disk could be made smaller. Personally, I like the size of the Mini. When they make a 20GB one, I will replace my 3G iPod with it - the only question is whether it will be 20GB of hard disk or Flash.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Very good news by devinoni · · Score: 1

      They have 8 gb ipod mini will probably arrive at the same time, since the harddrive of that size has been available for a few months now.

      Maybe we'll see 1 and 4Gb Shuffle, 6 and 8Gb Mini.

    5. Re:Very good news by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      Maybe they will make an Ipod Thin Mini. Shaped like a Mini... but thin. l;-)

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    6. Re:Very good news by Elranzer · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because each of those 4GB flashcards cost like $200+ in themselves. Apple will mostly get them discounted and you'll not likely pay $200 just for the internal, but if they put even two of those things in an iPod Mini, it would have to cost the consumer at least $400 (for an 8GB player!) in order for Apple not not go bankrupt over it.

    7. Re:Very good news by milimetric · · Score: 1

      touche, realistic person

      however, the cost of those little things should be going down soon, just like the cost of all the other memory. Then, my dreams will come true and fie you with your feasibility concerns : )

      Man, it would be so cool though, like a 20 GB flash mp3 god. I'd pay like 1000 for that if it has good data protection

    8. Re:Very good news by stevejsmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You get discounts when you buy in bulk. You get it practically for free when you buy 40% of a company's stock in any given period.

      Like all economics, the drugs analogy works best: one gram of cocaine is $50, an eight-ball (1/8 of an ounce -- 3.5 grams) is $150, but with bricks of the white, powdery goodness, you get it for less than $10/gram.

    9. Re:Very good news by McNally · · Score: 2, Funny
      Maybe they will make an Ipod Thin Mini.
      Sounds too much like an iTampon. Will it have "specially absorbent wings" that soak up that blue mystery fluid they use in the ads?
    10. Re:Very good news by spewey · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a Girl Scout cookie. Oh wait, that's Thin Mint.

    11. Re:Very good news by cowscows · · Score: 1

      Maybe it won't get that much smaller. Maybe they'll use the space saved for something else (larger battery, different/extra connector?)

      Maybe they'll just make it thinner. That'd still make it fit in a pocket better, while still keeping the same ui hardware.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    12. Re:Very good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be a maxi-pad. Try getting a girlfriend!

    13. Re:Very good news by Achoi77 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rumor from the grapevine has is that Samsung approached Apple and offered to match the cost of the tiny harddrive that are currently in the Ipodmini. So, Apple really isn't losing any money per unit. Then again, Apple really isn't going to gain any either. The big benefit is mostly consumer based: longer battery life, no moving parts, smaller space. The big benefit for Samsung is that they get a major push for a lot of these into the market, and force out their competitor at the same time. Then they make a name for themselves and get other companies like Creative, Dell or even Microsoft to purchase, once they can afford to reduce costs. When can we start seeing these things in laptops?

    14. Re:Very good news by martinX · · Score: 1

      I didn't know whether to mod you up or report you :-)

      Hmmm, karma on /. or kudos with the FBI. Decisions, decisions...

      Oh, expect a knock at the door sometime soon. HAND :-)

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    15. Re:Very good news by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Cost may be another factor.

      I foresee the prices of 4GB flash memory based devices to fall very soon.

      I just saw that Sandisk has launched a 4GB USB flash storage device (Thumbdrive, Flashdrive, Jumpdrive etc, same diff, diff branding.)

    16. Re:Very good news by FaasNat · · Score: 1

      Haven't been too big of a fan of the Shuffle. I prefer the LCD screen and being able to pick what song I'm listening to. Hmmm.....With these improvements, maybe they'll throw a FM radio in it.

      --
      There's never enough when you have too little
    17. Re:Very good news by karnal · · Score: 1

      I don't think the poster would get into trouble primarily about the drug pricing.

      It's the comment about "white, powdery goodness" that may cause issues.

      --
      Karnal
    18. Re:Very good news by hostyle · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that its not white? Cause it is.

      Not powdery? It certainly is.

      Not goodness? Go try some and come back to us with a report.

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    19. Re:Very good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why grass him up to the pigs ? He's got some pretty keen prices in bulk...

      *** walks to cashline ***

    20. Re:Very good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't that make it rather expensive?

    21. Re:Very good news by sud_crow · · Score: 1

      Actually, they are getting a benefit. The publicity one, and i believe its one of the best benefits you can get.

      If you have people talking about iPod, Apple and Samsung, they are all getting free publicity AND if they actually do this, the marketing department will have some work too, as the: "longer battery life, no moving parts and smaller space" at the same price point will mean more people will be interested. (Also, i would think that smaller space might mean --after some time-- a smaller production cost, less materials).

      I know i would check it if this happens!

      --
      no sig
    22. Re:Very good news by sribe · · Score: 1

      But size? Wouldn't they just end up with an iPod shuffle with a screen?

      Maybe they would keep the controls and display the same, but make it thinner, and shorter by eliminating some of the "blank metal space" above and below the scroll wheel. That would be sweet, in my opinion...

    23. Re:Very good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White and powdery, yes. Goodness: no. It's a crappy drug. It's nothing more than too many double espressos, without the jitters. And then you just want more of it. It wouldn't be so bad if it weren't for that always wanting more aspect.

      Fuck coke. It's even uglier and stupider than alcohol.

    24. Re:Very good news by stevejsmith · · Score: 1

      That was Novocaine you snorted, not coke.

  2. Slashdot by kevin_conaway · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rumors for nerds. Stuff that may turn out to matter tomorrow.

    1. Re:Slashdot by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is actually Step 2 in the The Apple Product Cycle

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Slashdot by hobbesx · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But this way, tomorrow's story won't be a dupe!
      (Please don't mod me redundant!)

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    3. Re:Slashdot by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Well, it's better than `News for people who don't read tech sites. Stuff you vaguely remember reading about last month. Or sometimes last week / yesterday / earlier today on Slashdot.'

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:Slashdot by interiot · · Score: 1

      And steps 1 through 49 in the Google Product Cycle. You know, Google already sells hardware (Google rackmount stuff), so breaking into the LED Mice business or even the console business isn't out of the question at this point. And where are their 9nm CPUs??

    5. Re:Slashdot by Arcane_Rhino · · Score: 1

      (Please don't mod me redundant!)

      Quit taking away mod points from moderators. You know they cannot resist moderating you redundant if you ask them not to do so. Such a polite request is baiting the moderators if I ever saw it.

    6. Re:Slashdot by hobbesx · · Score: 1
      Ah-ha! It was actually Troll bait!

      Thbpbhphbphphphbttt!!! ;)


      Still, reading your post, I'm not sure if you're being sarcastic or not?

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
  3. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would buy that. Never liked the idea of jogging with a hard drive strapped to my arm.

    1. Re:Finally by Golias · · Score: 5, Informative

      I call FUD. I jog with my 20GB iPod every day, and I've never had a problem.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that 250 Gig LaCie firewire hard drive looks so sporty on you!

    3. Re:Finally by timle · · Score: 0

      I had my doubts but I too jog alot with my trusty ipod strapped to my arm - no problems so far.

    4. Re:Finally by Reducer2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I call FUD on you! People who post to ./ don't jog, their only heavy breathing occurs when a bugfix is released to the Linux kernel.

      --
      When you get to hell -- tell 'em Itchy sent ya!
    5. Re:Finally by macaulay805 · · Score: 1

      I call BS!

      You have a low /. UID and jog??

    6. Re:Finally by milimetric · · Score: 1

      um... do you like have a computer game called Jogging where you "jog" every day because as is listed on Apple's web site the iPods have a skip free timeout of like 20 minutes so any serious jog would make it skip I would assume.

    7. Re:Finally by murch · · Score: 1

      My 40GB iPod doesn't do too well with my jogging. It seems to only last 30 to 40 minutes, and then just stops playing. I've got to plug it in and reset it once I get back home. However, I just got a 6GB iPod Mini about a week ago, and I haven't had that problem. I don't know if it's because it's still new, or if it bounces around less because of its reduced weight. Either way, I've also got a little 1GB Sony Network Walkman which I just take to the gym as my backup, in case my Mini eventually starts to fail on me.

    8. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is this dot-slash of which you speak?

    9. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like /., but with a goatee...

    10. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should've stopped at "never liked the idea of jogging."
      so when was the last time you left your parents' basement?

    11. Re:Finally by Golias · · Score: 1

      4 miles a day, no skipping.

      And no, I'm not fast enough to run 4 miles in 20 minutes.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    12. Re:Finally by milimetric · · Score: 1

      really? That's like contrary to what Everyone else says about these things. Cool, but it's still weird that you're like the only one I've heard of with that experience. If it ever breaks on you, please post back to this.

    13. Re:Finally by Golias · · Score: 1

      Uh... There are a couple people on this thread alone reporting good luck with their iPods.

      I imagine how you carry it is a factor. I just keep the iPod in one hand the whole time, so when the HD spins up it's usually not a problem. If somebody were to strap it to their hip or something, I can imagine it would get banged around quite a bit more.

      Anyway, I've been running almost every day with this thing for months now, and never once has it skipped or failed to queue up as a result. (The battery ran down on me once or twice though. It's one of the 3G players.) In the winter, I've also run on treadmills with the iPod sitting right on the front dashboard-like area, bouncing away. No problems at all.

      iPod drives are small and slow. They are built for data density and robustness, unlike most drives which are built for speed. They are obviously not as rock-solid as Flash, but they handle physical abuse considerably better than a typical desktop HD.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  4. Engadget? by J-bob2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is it all I see on Slashdot now-a-days is stories that were on engadget yesterday?

    1. Re:Engadget? by Golias · · Score: 1

      Why is it all I see on Slashdot now-a-days is stories that were on engadget yesterday?

      Because you (wisely) stay away from the "AskSlashdot" and "YRO" sections?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Engadget? by interiot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      A year or two ago, you could say the same thing about Slashdot-vs-BoingBoing. These days, it's really Slashdot-vs-Digg.

      Still, Slashdot is an old reliable standby for normal people who don't need 100%-up-to-date info, and Slashdot still has more people to argue with.

    3. Re:Engadget? by johndierks · · Score: 1

      Slashdot still has more people to argue with. That's not true!

    4. Re:Engadget? by interiot · · Score: 1

      That's not true!

      I bet you don't have the statistical data to prove it!

    5. Re:Engadget? by bano · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Here is the flochart for this type of news.

      Some sweaty dude in (pick a technology producing country japan,korea,taiwan,china) posts on his blog that the company he works at for USD $0.50/hr is demo'ing some product.
      Gizmodo posts it first 50% of the time
      Engadget posts it first 50% of the time

      Once the later of those 2 post it(usually 24hours).
      Some sweaty slashdot reader submits it to slashdot.
      Later that day after 3 other sweaty slashdot readers submissions havge been rejected.
      Roland Piquepalle rings Roblimo on the telly and gets it posted on slashdot.

    6. Re:Engadget? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it all I see on Slashdot are losers that scrape the internet for a similar story posted yesterday just so they can give that lame-ass line?

  5. Snappier? No, flashier! by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 4, Funny
    So will the constant in-joke among the Mac crowd change from:

    "It just feels snappier!"

    to

    "It just seems flashier!"

  6. All your memory are belong to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    All your memory are belong to us. Well 40% of it anyways. After we pay you for it.

    Sincerely,

    Apple Computer

    1. Re:All your memory are belong to us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So even memory manufacturers can get 0wn3d? Or would this be closer to l3a5ing?

  7. About time by giorgiofr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I hope this will help drive down the cost of flash memory so that flash-based hard drives will become available to the general public. Silent, less power-hungry, more reliable. How longer will we have to put up with very fragile magnetic disks spinning at 7000+ rpm under a head that would cut them in half if contact occurred...

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
    1. Re:About time by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know! I go through about 10 or 20 hard drives per day and have to wear safety goggles because of all the shards of platters flying about!

    2. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not for a while, most companies are struggling to cope with demand as it is.

    3. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ipod hard drive doesn't even spin near 7000 rpm

    4. Re:About time by hode · · Score: 1

      Drive prices down? If anything, all this demand is going to drive prices up in the short term.

    5. Re:About time by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It doesn't work that way. For one, flash is competing against microdrive in that case, which is tougher to make mechanical drives that small, being 1" drives and all.

      For another, I don't think the heads can cut through the platter, the heads would break first.

      Lastly, flash isn't anywhere near able to compete against laptop drives, much less desktop drives. For $100, I think one can get a 60GB laptop drive, which is faster in bandwidth than a high performance $60 1GB flash SD or CF chip. The 1GB chip I just bought was a high performance one rated at 9MB/s, laptop drives are easily faster. Desktop drives are even cheaper and higher performance, beyond 60MB/s and less than 50 cents per gig.

    6. Re:About time by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 3, Interesting
      For another, I don't think the heads can cut through the platter, the heads would break first.

      At the old office, we had a disk whose heads ground the platters to dust: all that was left in the inside was the heads, a small (1/16") stub of platter material and a lot of dust. Very cool.

    7. Re:About time by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      Having recently had a HD die of mechanical reasons on me, and also having a rock (ok, screwdriver and hammer) I took apart a hard drive for fun. The platters themselves are about a milimeter thick while the drive heads are less, and a lot more flimsy. Maybe back in the day they could, but not these days.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
    8. Re:About time by iamhassi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "The 1GB chip I just bought was a high performance one rated at 9MB/s, laptop drives are easily faster. Desktop drives are even cheaper and higher performance, beyond 60MB/s and less than 50 cents per gig."

      yeah but hard drive's measure access time in milliseconds while ram accesses in nanoseconds. When you're playing hundreds of ~5 mB files access time is far more important than transfer rate.

      Not to mention a flash iPod could be much smaller and weigh a lot less with much longer battery life.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    9. Re:About time by wasted+time · · Score: 1

      How does access time become even remotely relevant when playing a ~5mb file? Wouldn't transfer speed be more important, especially when loading songs to the player? I thought access times should only be an issue if you're running some app on the player which is constantly reading/writing to the disk. What am I missing?

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
  8. how will it change the price? by tont0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what kind of price changes would we expect to see, if any? right now id love to get an iPod, but they are a take on the expensive side. Would be nice if it dropped just a little for the cheapo people like myself :)

    1. Re:how will it change the price? by varmittang · · Score: 1

      Not much since Apple will be getting the memory at a very steep discount. Said to be getting the memory for the same price as they were getting the hard drives. So it wont raise the iPods price, just makes it better.

      --
      -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
      12345
      -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    2. Re:how will it change the price? by TrippTDF · · Score: 4, Informative

      ...which is exactly what Apple does, doesn't it?

      Apple almost never drops their prices, they just make things better at the current price point... remember, $300 5 years ago got you a black and white 5 GB iPod... look what it gets you now.

      I bet it will be redesigned a little, but the price is going to stay where it is.

    3. Re:how will it change the price? by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Funny

      But then low-lifes like yourself would be part of the hip, chic, "wealthy-appearing" culture that is Apple's base. Since you obviously aren't rich enough to flush $350 for a consumer item that will be passe in a year, you arean't really a good advertisement for Apple, now are you?

      Gotta keep the riff-raff out, you know? ;-)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:how will it change the price? by SlowSlow · · Score: 1

      You basically just proved yourself wrong. Apple started out with their 5 GB black and white iPod at $400. They often do release faster/bigger models of their products for the same price, but they are also known to reduce the price of existing configurations.

    5. Re:how will it change the price? by anagama · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've wanted to replace my 192 mb (w/ extra memory card) creative nomad mg II for a while. The other day I stopped into the local Apple store to poke around and I saw that they had 3g 15gb ipods for sale at $199. These include a dock and a wallwart charger (headphones, beltclip, and sync cable of course). It's a refurbished one (Apple has these on their website for $189 -- but I like the instant gratifaction of store buying). Anyway, I have a psychological barrier against paying more than $200 for a music player -- so this was perfect. I know the 20gb color model is only $100 more (more like $140 if you throw in the missing dock), but I'm not going to spend that much on music player ... I learned my lesson w/ the nomad. I think it was about $250 (with base 64mbs, another $100 for the memor card) and I don't think I ever got my money's worth out of it.

      With the 15gb ipod I will get my money back -- I've copied over all my CDs and I've finally heard old beloved songs I hadn't heard in ages merely because digging through piles of CDs for one good song is such a pain. Anyway, shall I ramble even more? ....

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    6. Re:how will it change the price? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      In truth, the top-end model eventually becomes not the top-end model and thus the price goes down. If, however, you're trying to tell yourself that you're part of the exclusive Club Apple, you say that the bottom-end part was upgraded to be identical in every way to the top-end part, and the price stayed the same.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    7. Re:how will it change the price? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, where are you getting your info from? The iPod is 3 years old, not 5. And that's for the Mac only version.

    8. Re:how will it change the price? by Smurf · · Score: 1

      You're basically right. The iPod will turn 4 years old on October 23rd, that is, in two months.

  9. A small gap already by rob_squared · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having a 4GB iPod for $50 less thana full iPod seemed like a bad idea, but it worked. I'm wondering if using flash, which should increase price, will shorten the gap between the Mini and the low-end iPod. Then again, maybe apple wants people to notice the GB/price ratio and get the full-fledged iPod instead.

    --
    I don't get it.
    1. Re:A small gap already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  10. 40 percent is pretty significant by sexyrexy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't think the big news here is that Apple is making a Shuffle-Mini hybrid, but that Fourty percent of the world's Samsung Flash memory stock is going to be eaten by a single buyer. Think about how many different manufacturers and resellers buy that memory - and 40% of it is going to Apple. Wow.

    --

    Rex is 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:40 percent is pretty significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, 40% of the second half of their output, so really only 40% of 50% or 20% total. Still impressive, but not nearly as large.

    2. Re:40 percent is pretty significant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding!!
      file:///usr/share/applications/MozillaFirefox.desk top
      God, when I read that, my penis got hard, I swear. The funny thing is, this is "soft" memory replacing "hard" disks. :)

    3. Re:40 percent is pretty significant by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      And that greater than 40% of this particular technology is being used for entertainment purposes. Entertainment has a way of driving most technology, sooner or later.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  11. More info by i_should_be_working · · Score: 5, Informative

    More info here

    Looks like Samsung is wooing Apple with a price reduction. Samsung also makes mp3 players. Seems like they would hoard the memory for themselves. Maybe they have figured out the sweet spot, in terms of profit, of how much to keep for themselves and how much to sell to the best selling brand.

  12. Cost ... by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 1

    Sooooo is it just me or does a 4 gig piece of flash memory cost significantly more than a 4 gig hard disk? How were they planning on making up for that? Increase in price? Or will they market it differently than the 4 gig minis currently being sold with the hard drive.

    --
    We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
    1. Re:Cost ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a coincidence, it is just you!

    2. Re:Cost ... by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 1
      --
      We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
    3. Re:Cost ... by TRRosen · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The present talk is that in making such a large purchase Apple has cut the price of a 4 Gb flash drive in half making it the same price as a HD.

      This is similar to the fact that when Apple introduced the iPod the 5Gb drive it used actualy cost more then the iPod retailed for causing many to buy iPods just for the drive. Of course Apple was probably less then 1/3 that price for them due to there sizable orders.

    4. Re:Cost ... by damiam · · Score: 1

      They'll take a cut in profits, initially. Apple makes a large margin on 4GB minis, and will probably make a small margin on flash-based Minis. They'll make up for it in volume and publicity (the coolness factor of flash memory). And the price of flash drives will keep going down.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:Cost ... by jensen404 · · Score: 1

      Before Apple started using the mini hard drive, it was only being sold directly to end users in low quantities at high margins (with little competition).

      Flash memory is already a huge market with hundreds of devices using it. I don't see as much room for cutting prices.

  13. How much would you pay? by L.+VeGas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An iPod mini with flash memory instead of a hard drive obviously would have much better battery life and be significantly lighter.

    What's it worth to you, though? $300? Will we have to wait a while before the price point becomes attractive? For me, frankly, battery life has never been an issue.

    1. Re:How much would you pay? by DisownedSky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Battery life is only an issue when you travel with it and forget to bring your charger. I just drop it in the dock at night and let it synch and recharge. As for ruggeddness - the Mini is hard to break - I've dropped mine several times with no problems. It also is more than acceptably light weight.

      So, it's wait and see as to why Apple is doing this.

      --

      "The impossible often has a certain integrity that the merely improbable lacks" - Dirk Gently

    2. Re:How much would you pay? by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Battery life is only an issue when you travel with it and forget to bring your
      > charger. I just drop it in the dock at night and let it synch and recharge.

      I've got a Creative Zen Xtra. It's great, but having to carry the charger is tedious. It's a real shame there's no apparant demand for one single charger which chargers every battery of it's type - ie a lithium ion charger which works for Zens, phones, walkmen etc, another for Ni Cds. Then you could just leave a charger (which would be extremely cheap) at home, work, etc and not have to worry about it. It would also make it much more likely you could get a charge for your phone/digital camera/portable games console if you were abroad etc. Er.rant over.

    3. Re:How much would you pay? by binarybum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      disagree - battery life is paramount on portable devices as are size and weight. I tend to travel places where there is no place to plug in a charger. You should view any portable device as portable only when it has charge, so a device with less battery life is in a sense less portable.
        Size and weight play into the opportunity cost of the device. I have to carry a lot of stuff when I'm traveling around. Music is nice to have, but am I willing to lose an entire pocket to it? Am I willing to have an additional something warm and heavy clunking against my thigh (whoa, I'm asking for it with that one). the lesser those size/weight/heat issues become, the more likely one is to consider the device worthy of occupying their luggage space.

      --
      ôó
  14. A good idea by Jetekus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hopefully this would push down the size of the iPod mini. I can't help but hide a smile when people talk about how small the minis are, when you can get 10 times the storage on something only about twice as big...

    Until the iPod mini is really small (like shuffle size), it is just impractical for people with decent sized music collections. The size and weight you save vs the large models isn't enough to outweigh the loss in capacity. Of course, I guess it's ok for people who call 64kbps "near CD quality"...

    1. Re:A good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most of us dont want 10 times the storage for something that bulky.

      the mini fits nicely in my pocket, the normal ipod doesnt even come close

      i have music on it i listen to as opposed to filling it with stuff i wont listen to

    2. Re:A good idea by ashpool7 · · Score: 1

      I fail to see how making the Mini smaller makes it more practical to people with larger music collections. Perhaps more attractive...

    3. Re:A good idea by Jetekus · · Score: 1

      That's fair enough, I mean people are buying them, so they must have a use for them.

      Maybe I'm just more eclectic than most...

    4. Re:A good idea by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      If you want smaller than a mini, get a shuffle or some other stick-of-gum sized player.

      The whole point of the mini is, it's the smallest you can go and still retain the excellent ipod touch wheel interface. THAT's why people buy a lot of them. Small enough to pocket but still containing the interface that keeps apple dominating the market.

    5. Re:A good idea by Moofie · · Score: 1

      My SO's music collection is larger than the largest available iPod, so she opted for the 4gb mini. She uses smart playlists, and fools with it every week or so to re-jigger the contents. Seems to work fine for her.

      Me, I've got a smaller collection that fits on my 40gb, but not for long. Certainly not when I figure out how to glom our collections together...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:A good idea by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 1

      To me personally, storage space and battery life are much more important than size.....

      However, my wife says that "size matters".

      --
      (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
    7. Re:A good idea by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      it is just impractical for people with decent sized music collections.

      I beg to differ. My music collection is 'reasonable' weighing in at something just under what the largest ipod will hold. My audiobook collection (with a smattering of podcasts and old radio productions) though tops 1/4tb. Since there is _no_ way any portable player is going to hold all of that any time soon there's simply no point in trying.


      I have a mini. I bought it because it had the wheel, was intuitive enough to use while walking (no visuals need most of the time) weighed less than the other hdd models (I tend to drop things) and it was cheap. That last point being the most important one. For 2/3s the cost of a 'larger' ipod I got everything I wanted.

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    8. Re:A good idea by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 1

      I have, at last check, >68GB of MP3s, which is more than can fit on the largest iPod. I own a mini because (a) it has a screen, so I can read my calendar and contacts and leave my Palm at home, (b) it's large enough for a week-long trip and/or carrying non-music files around.

      Sure, I could have more storage or color with a larger iPod, but I don't really care. I have my standard playlists, and a smart playlist of randomly-selected stuff I haven't listed to in a while to keep things interesting. As far as I'm concerned, anything else is just wasted money. (Speaking of which, I had planned to get a mini even before I got mine free from Citibank.)

    9. Re:A good idea by martinX · · Score: 1

      Me, I've got a smaller collection that fits on my 40gb, but not for long. Certainly not when I figure out how to glom our collections together...

      How hard could that be. I mean, it's not rocket science...

      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
    10. Re:A good idea by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      It's a bit difficult using iTunes, though.

      First, although iTunes will let you share your library, it's only available for others to listen to -- they can't modify it or download it to their own iPod.

      Second, you can't add music from someone else's account to your library without fiddling with the UNIX permissions (which isn't difficult for us, but could be for the majority of users). Of course, you could also copy both sets of files to the Shared directory instead, but then you no longer have a distinction between "your" music and "her" music.

      Third, once you have access to all the files, it's still necessary to somehow merge the iTunes data files so that you retain playcounts and such. That's the hardest part, especially since the file that matters isn't "iTunes Music Library.xml", it's the "iTunes Library" data file, which has an unknown, proprietary, and non-human-readable format.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    11. Re:A good idea by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Copy the files?

      Easy.

      Preserve my metadata?

      Less easy.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  15. aborted 'funny' post about being flashed by milktoastman · · Score: 1, Funny

    Okay, my comedic skills have failed me (as have my numchuck [sic] skills, my bo staff skills, my computer hacking skills, etc.)...Anyway, I was trying to come with some sort of joke about flash memory. You know, something about being flashed, the memory of being flashed, whatever...but no, I've got nothing. I can't find the proper set up or timing. Any of you have better skill at executing this idea?

    1. Re:aborted 'funny' post about being flashed by Jetekus · · Score: 1

      Weird, it's like the joke is right there, yet it's hard to put into words... All I can think of is something like: "So even more iPods are resorting to flashing now? I thought they were the classy man's MP3 player!" I realise that doesn't make total sense, but maybe someone can use that to make a decent joke. It's humour, but wiki-style. :)

    2. Re:aborted 'funny' post about being flashed by hobbesx · · Score: 1

      /me furiously twirls "numchucks" about and hits self in the nuts.

      --
      This rating is Unfair ( ) ( ) Fair (*) Funny
      Sigh... If only. Modding would be so much more fun.
    3. Re:aborted 'funny' post about being flashed by milktoastman · · Score: 1

      I was thinking something about jogging, and getting flashed with your iPod in hand. Like, "Take a jog with your iPod past certain homeless guys in the park, and you could get a few choice 'flash memories' for free, if you know what I mean...."

    4. Re:aborted 'funny' post about being flashed by jatemack · · Score: 1

      The Next Headline on /.
      "Rio releases the Rio Mini Moon, and Rio Brazilian Cut to compete with Apples Ipod Mini Flash..."
      *abort, abort....* this sucks...

      --
      // no
    5. Re:aborted 'funny' post about being flashed by milktoastman · · Score: 1

      Abort-worthy perhaps, although I love any excuse to dwell on Brazilian cuts....

    6. Re:aborted 'funny' post about being flashed by Psychor · · Score: 1
      My attempt:

      A man was arrested in Central Park last week whilst flashing his iPod. Onlookers objected to the size of his firmware.

    7. Re:aborted 'funny' post about being flashed by milktoastman · · Score: 1

      obscure, but to those of us who get it, it was pretty well timed. That was good.

    8. Re:aborted 'funny' post about being flashed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iPods flash, showing off pale white bodies.

  16. how much? by demonbug · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just doing a quick search of retail prices, it looks like I could get a 4 GB compact flash card for about $250, while a 4 GB microdrive runs about $200. Anyone know what the price is like on the Samsung NAND flash memory? The article claims Samsung would have to drop prices 50% to match microdrives, but that seems like a little much - how much less power does NAND flash memory use than a microdrive, and how much less battery would a flash-based device need for comparable performance?

  17. It's great as long as...... by hcob$ · · Score: 0, Troll

    You don't constantly add, remove, and overwrite files on the drive. The one drawback to using flash media is that it has a Limited Life Span. You can only write to each cell a certain number of times. So don't rush out and buy these if you plan on changing up what's on your list often.

    --
    Cliff Claven
    K.E.G. Party Chairman
    Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    1. Re:It's great as long as...... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you update your iPod once per day (for new podcasts mostly and a couple additions to your song collection) and you get 100,000 writes with flash memory (IIRC), then that's about 270 years of use.

    2. Re:It's great as long as...... by WombatControl · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is getting to be an urban legend...

      Yes, flash memory has a limited lifespan. So too does magnetic media. One can reasonably expect at least 10,000 write cycles on a particular NAND gate for consumer level flash memory - and that's the barest minimum. It's even more likely that you'll get a million cycles out of consumer NAND flash memory these days. And even that is conservative - it could be several million.

      In normal operation, how long would it take before you would use up a million writes on a particular sector? And with arranging files intelligently on the memory, that's going to be less of a concern. Do you completely recreate your entire music library on your iPod every single time you add a song? Probably not. Would you do this a million times before buying a new iPod. I'm guessing no.

      The number of cycles on current NAND flash technology is more than enough to last for years. Granted, I wouldn't want to use it for a swap partition, but for storing your music library you should be perfectly fine.

    3. Re:It's great as long as...... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Plus, music storage is one of the few applications where a flipped bit here or there is unlikely to hurt anything. The effective lifespan is probably much longer if you can tolerate some error rate.

  18. Re:too bad by i_should_be_working · · Score: 1

    The silver lining is that Samsung also makes mp3/ogg players, so Apple can't have a complete monopoly. They say they will have a 4gb flash player out next year.

  19. Perhaps an array by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Nothing says Apple has to stick with using only one 4GB flash memory... (beyond price).

    A smaller Mini that holds 8GB might go over well, and fit even better between the large iPods and the Shuffle.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  20. Maturing market blues by phorest · · Score: 1, Troll

    People, just how many DAPS do you need?

    Hey everyone, throw out your first gen & 2nd gen DAP's because our innovation is sure to please!

    My Creative JB2 is still playing (24/7) since christmas 2001. I liked it so much that I bought an IRiver H320 to be able to record at bitrates up to 320kbs. I suppose I'll buy another upgrade someday but why go lateral when it boils down to "It does the same thing" (but wait... that nasty consumerizm is the monkey on my back and gosh it is from apple!)

    It would be nice to see more features not more stripped-out things that have been done previously.

    Now if it can record at 320kbs and not be DRM heavy, I'll consider it

    --
    God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    1. Re:Maturing market blues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF is a DAP?

    2. Re:Maturing market blues by phorest · · Score: 1

      Coward... get with your acronyms.

      D igital A udio P layer

      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    3. Re:Maturing market blues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DAP? That's what pimply slashdot geeks call the whole category in a vain attempt to pretend that there are other contenders to the iPod throne. Must ... have ... TLA!

    4. Re:Maturing market blues by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Ummm, your beloved Creative has been releasing products by the bushel since 2001. The only difference between Apple's offerings and Creative's is that Creative's are more numerous (in terms of model count) and less popular (units sold).

      Nobody's coming to your house to take away your JB2 or whatever. Nobody's making you upgrade anything. Take a deep breath.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Maturing market blues by 2008 · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't own one yet. An 8 gig flash player might just convince me, so long as it's cheap and they doesn't leave the screen off.
      So, roll on the new models until they've convinced everyone to buy, I say.

      --
      I quit!
    6. Re:Maturing market blues by Slipped_Disk · · Score: 1

      I thought DAP made silicone sealants.....
      *shrug*

      --
      /~mikeg
    7. Re:Maturing market blues by Pope · · Score: 3, Insightful

      320kbps MP3s are a fucking waste of diskspace and time. You gain nothing with a bitrate that high, a 192VBR would be much better.

      And in case nobody has bothered to tell you or you're too ignorant to do your own research, there is no DRM on files you rip yourself, so I have no idea what you're talking about at the end there.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    8. Re:Maturing market blues by phorest · · Score: 1

      Jeeze, just when did geeks want anything popular?

      I like things that work well, I like to record stuff, I really use what I buy. The war over which player is best is stupid. I like Apples interface but sadly the extended features are lacking. That's just me.

      They all do mostly the same thing... (play music). But mine both record by mic, or by line input which is really keen for me. Creative upset me when they dropped all recording features after JB3 which in my estimation was a mistake for them because they were pretty strong out of the gate by being in the stores early (big-box retailers).

      They (Creative) don't have that zing anymore and they haven't marketed a product to replace my JB2. Besides, recording isn't on the "A" list for most consumers and while I may have that H320, that too was a sales dog and is now discontinued. (bought the diplay model for 100 bucks off, great score!

      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    9. Re:Maturing market blues by Moofie · · Score: 1

      What's the problem? Apple is releasing another product that doesn't appeal to you. So what? Why the rant?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    10. Re:Maturing market blues by phorest · · Score: 1
      It records at that speed IF you want it to... guess what, then you edit it and break it down (bitrate) a little more if you want.

      I would go .wav for recording, however...I don't store it at that speed. What I typically love are people who claim to be audiophiles and listen to noise that is called music...and still worry about lossy vs.lossless. It's a friggin concert with background noise! I'd do .wav on my stupid sony minidisc with no backlighting but the H320 is much better to see in some venues, beautiful color screen... that said it fills the bill.

      I don't do DRM... ever so why should I want something that I'll never use. I do use it for ripped music too, so I guess I am saying I'll never have an ITunes -or- Napster account! To each his own
      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    11. Re:Maturing market blues by phorest · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call it a rant, I was just pointing out that it's a maturing market and yet there's a buzz like the normal product upgrade cycle is right now, when in fact the previous generation players are still working fine. Ride that horse till it's dead, so to speak...

      Nothing to see here... move along

      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    12. Re:Maturing market blues by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

      Try 256 ABR (Lame --abr 256). You can tell the difference between 192 and 256 on quality systems.

    13. Re:Maturing market blues by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

      Why are you creating MP3's on your MP3 player?
      Do you like wasting your time? Your PC will make Mp3s much faster than any Mp3 player.
      If you are getting DRM protected MP3s you're using crap software.

      Please try this:
      1) Download Lame (Linux) or Winlame
      2) Rip CD Audio to Wav using Audiograbber or EAC
      3) Create Mp3's using lame, like this (lame.exe --abr 256 filename.wav filename.mp3). You can also enter the --abr 256 in Audiograbbers MP3 tab so it will do all of this automatically, including assigning a full ID3 tag to all your new DRM, HQ Mp3s.

      That's it!

      Besides the confusing name, Lame IS and Mp3 encoder!

    14. Re:Maturing market blues by phorest · · Score: 1

      Read what I posted. Yep, gonna drag that desktop into a smokey club with drinks spillin on the keyboard and people tripping over the power cord.

      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    15. Re:Maturing market blues by quakeroatz · · Score: 1

      You didn't say anything in your post about recording Mp3's in clubs.

      And if you really think recording live music on an Mp3 player at 320kbps is even close to a wise use of all those bits, you are a bigger twit than you already sound like.

    16. Re:Maturing market blues by blibbler · · Score: 1

      If you read the parent post more carefully, you will realise that the parent is referring to recording 320kbps MP3 *on the device*. This is even more retarded than recording 320kbps from a CD as the microphone on that device is unlikely to be very high quality, and even if it was, the background noise of even the HDD spinning would destroy the value of those extra bits. Even ignoring the microphone aspect of it, 320kbps is designed for full stereo. There is no chance that a device that small could record meaningful stereo without external microphones. Any decent lossless encoder would encode to smaller than 320kbps on mono 44.1kHz audio.

    17. Re:Maturing market blues by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One of my Japanese co-workers had this to say about Sony:

      They are masters of selling you expensive things you don't need. Case in point: TVs, Walkmen, Discmen, speakers, DVD players, boomboxes, and Playstations.

      I think, of DAPs and Apple, something similar can be said:

      Apple is master of making things you didn't know you need, at prices you didn't think you were willing to pay.

      You got a Creative JB2 in Christmas 2001 INSTEAD of an Apple iPod, 5gb (which is what I bought). Yours is 10gb, but is also the same size as a Mac mini. I later sold my 5gb iPod to a friend, and got a 10gb iPod, which I STILL have as well. I now have a 512mb iPod shuffle.

      You bought an iRiver H320 instead of an iPod; I suppose, from your admission, that you use it to record, and you wonder, "Why would I ever buy an iPod?" because you assume it's a lateral move. Apple's positioning is that there are TWO products that you don't own yet, and that is the mini and the shuffle.

      Well, lets put it another way; Your iRiver replaces your JB2 in both size and capacity; the mini replaces your iRiver in terms of 'carriability'. You can fit a mini in your breast pocket, your jeans pocket, your back pocket, etc. It's smaller than many cellphones, and is useful because it's size allows it to be lighter and easier to carry. It's not meant to record (which is why you use your iRiver), but only for strict playback.

      In other terms, it is a portable laptop to your iRiver desktop.

      The shuffle is even smaller, more rugged, and lighter; it is a PDA to your iPod mini laptop!

  21. Apple Leads Again by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Apple put a mouse on every one of their computers - now every computer has a mouse (or equivalent). Apple put a CD-ROM in every Mac - now every computer has one. Apple put ethernet in every Mac - now it's default standard. Apple put a "universal serial bus" in every Mac, for data and media, and now we all use them. If they replace HDs with FlashROM for all personal storage, we might just all get to leave the rotating discs behind, connected to the network. Go, Apple, go!

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Apple Leads Again by Pryon · · Score: 1

      I don't know about CD-ROM, mice, or USB, but I spent plenty of time in a heterogeneous shop hanging special dongles off of the macs in order to get them to talk to the other machines with internal ethernet cards. Does the name Farallon mean anything to you?

    2. Re:Apple Leads Again by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yes, at the time PCs were running "TOPS networks". There were predecessrors to everything: Apple had computers before the mouse, too. But once they switched to each of those techs, everyone else followed the lead that Apple proved was the way to go.

      There were other computers with ethernet standard before Apple, like Sun Sparcstations. But they didn't push everyone into offering them; Apple did the push that put the industry over the edge. That's how pushing the envelope over the tipping point works, and Apple is always there. Does the word "iPod" mean anything to you?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Apple Leads Again by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      That dongle used to drive me nuts, too, but then a coworker pointed out that it was still an ethernet card inside the Mac. The dongle was to enable the card to connect to either an RJ-45-ended cable, or something else with a different type of connector (thinnet, perhaps? it's been a while). That made me feel better about Apple, at least until the next dongle popped off on its own.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    4. Re:Apple Leads Again by larkost · · Score: 1

      AUII, a competing standard to RJ-45 Ethernet (BaseT). Sun also used them for a while, and at the time Apple decided on it it was the best bet... but since they were early they took the risk of betting on the wrong horse, and that was what happened.

      PC's on the other hand were woefully late having Ethernet standard (on the motherboard). They are also now woefully late to have FireWire.

      Ironically, Apple was late to having WiFi included in every Laptop. They were the first to have it in a laptop, the first to have the Antennas built into to every laptop, but they kept the actual card as a option for too long.

    5. Re:Apple Leads Again by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1
      "All personal storage?"

      One model of iPod definitely doesn't meet that qualification. If this revolution were to happen, Apple would have to use flash memory in everything they produce, and that's not very likely.

      Hell, you even said it yourself. Notice how many times you used "every" in your post?

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    6. Re:Apple Leads Again by Jozer99 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Apple put an Appletalk serial networking port on every mac, now... no, well... Apple put a 256 greyscale display option on every mac in 1997, now we... crap... Apple put a Firewire port on every Mac, now... well, maybe... Apple put an ADC connector on every Mac... um, you know what, I give freaken up!

    7. Re:Apple Leads Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ADB dumbass.

    8. Re:Apple Leads Again by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Did you notice that I used the word "if" in my post, as in: speculation that this move is the beginning of a wider trend?

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    9. Re:Apple Leads Again by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and they put an Apple logo on every PC they've ever made, but no one else has. So what? I never said that other PC makers have done everything that Apple has done. I just said that several of the things that every PC now has were pushed into universality by Apple first. Just because you're a pioneer doesn't mean you colonize every territory.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:Apple Leads Again by Maserati · · Score: 1

      Just last month I threw out, oh, 10 pounds (two bins) of Farallon AAUI transceivers. I kept even a couple for the Laserwriters (umm, yeah, I definitely kept some).

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    11. Re:Apple Leads Again by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      I have pentiums made 2 years before the iMac came out that have built in USB ports. Computers with color monitors were out A DECADE before the mac, although not so cheap.

    12. Re:Apple Leads Again by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I don't know why I have to give so many lessons in elementary logic on Slashdot, but here goes.

      I said that Apple does things that lead the whole industry to universal adoption. I named several examples. I did not say that Apple leads every innovation. I did not say that only Apple leads. I did not say that everything Apple does leads to universal adoption. I did not say all kinds of other things about Apple's leadership. Please don't say that I did, by arguing with things that I never said as if I had said them.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    13. Re:Apple Leads Again by wasted+time · · Score: 1

      Gee, I can't believe you left out Keyboards, Floppy Drives, Motherboards, CRTs, PSUs, and CPUs!

      But seriously, this is a rumor about Apple buying a lot of flash to use in a friggin music player. It's something that has been done by almost everyone for years; and long before Apple. How does that translate to Apple Leads Again, again?

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    14. Re:Apple Leads Again by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      For your first comment, I refer you to my Slashdot logic refresher course.

      For your second comment, finally a valid complaint in this thread, I say: Apple is a leader. iTunes wasn't before Napster, iPod wasn't before Rio. Leadership doesn't mean getting there first, it means setting the expectations for everyone once you've been there. I'm hoping Apple's move to replace HDs with FlashROM for large personal storage (4GB is almost the capacity of lots of notebooks) will again set the pace for the industry direction. Because Apple has done it before (which I bet most people never realize), and I'd like them to do it again. Otherwise, it will be yet another case of the industry ignoring Apple's leadership to its detriment, and another reason the people left behind with inferior platforms will think of Apple users as "elitist".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:Apple Leads Again by wasted+time · · Score: 1

      Heh, my first comment was a joke. My second comment was an easy fact added simply to question you about the silly subject you gave your post and take a jab at the 3 word exclamation at the end. I don't necessarily disagree with a lot of your comments in this thread; I just think you used a ridiculous fan-boy method to voice your hopes. Basically, I'm just being a smartass. (some would call it trolling but I just call it being me)

      Take no personal offense, because I have truly enjoyed many of your observations and comments over the few months I've been wasting time around here. It kind of surprised me to see your name on this post. I didn't comment as AC because I figured you'd take it in stride.

      This does bring up an interesting but off topic dilemma - how to filter based on content rather than foes lists or group think. I wish someone would develop a grease monkey script that allowed me eliminate all the MS, Apple, or whoever fan-boy drivel and only show comments with actual informative content. Of course I don't know how they'd do it; that's not my line of work. But then again, I guess I'd be missing out on all this fun stuff. - Cheers

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    16. Re:Apple Leads Again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Correlation versus causation. You haven't shown shit.

    17. Re:Apple Leads Again by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      When you post a joke, if it's not actually funny, but just makes fun, it will be taken as an insult by me. If it's a little bit of harmless fun, and you indicate you expect just a laugh with maybe an emoticon or some words to that effect, that's probably how it will be taken. Otherwise, expect reprisals ;).

      As for my post being "fanboy": it's not. Apple really did lead the industry to standardize on including all those features. Which are fundamentally important in letting every user expect that basic functionality from every computer, Mac or not. We have already taken too long to switch from discs to FlashROM drives, and I can see where Apple is going. I have used Apples since 1979 (Apple I), and I worked for Apple in the early 1990s. I haven't owned a Mac since 1996, when I was the first person in the world to bring a Quadra9500 to its knees (and I owned a beta 6100). Because I got sucked in by Win95's OLE app integration.

      But I'm so clued to Apple's momentum that I can tell when they're launching a new HW direction that will take the industry along with it. Like dropping floppy drives (which I wanted for years): depending on how this FlashROM move plays out in their iPods, then their iBooks, and how the supply chain holds up, I expect Apple to push the industry into moving to all-FlashROM within the next 5 years.

      That's not some Apple worship at work. Everything I've said is true, and in proportion. Including the status of my hope that Apple will take the step that the industry is ready for. If you do get some way to filter out hopeful posts, you're probably only going to see my posts flaming back some moron, or probably none at all. You can probably get that if you get a feature that lets you browse at "<=-1".

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    18. Re:Apple Leads Again by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I've shown a trend. That doesn't imply, or necessitate, any mechanics of causation. So fuck off, Anonymous asshole Coward. You've shown nothing but your venal stupidity.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    19. Re:Apple Leads Again by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 1
      I...

      You be quiet, mister. >_>

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    20. Re:Apple Leads Again by wasted+time · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'm going to drop this and chalk it up to semantics.

      Before I leave it however, I'd like to make a deal with you. I'll gladly pass along any hopeful filters I come across. You, being so clued to Apple's momentum, should be able to tell me when they're about to tank so I can dump their stock. If you have Apple that firmly in your sights, I'm going to start calling you William Tell. ;)

      --
      The Stone Age did not end because humans ran out of stones. - William McDonough
    21. Re:Apple Leads Again by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Again, you're engaging in a fallacy of a negated converse, and just generalization - not semantics, but logic. Just because I can often tell when Apple is about to do something that will lead the industry, that doesn't mean I can always tell. I'm not always right. I'm not always sensitive to when they're about to blow it. And I'm not tuned into the market, per se, and its reactions to Apple's moves - in fact, I'm better tuned than is the market, so my appreciation isn't always met by appreciation in their stock.

      I think this move by Apple will be recognizable within a year or two as the point at which Apple started dumping "personal HDs" for FlashROM, just as they started dumping the floppy for ethernet and CD-ROM. Judge me on that - you won't need any further info from me.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  22. Re:Talk about a news flash.... by Radres · · Score: 2, Funny

    Samsung: "Apple is always after me lucky flash memory; it's expensively shock-resistant!"

  23. A long, long time by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Informative

    This has been brought up in photography circles for quite some time. A surprising number of people were adverse to flash based Compact Flash (CF) cards because of this.

    BUT - you get unlimited reads, lots and lots of writes (about 10^6 with modern cards) and the write longevity can be improved by buffering algorithms. I wouldn't use flash for a swap file, but unless your taste in music changes every 30 seconds, flash memory should be just fine.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:A long, long time by bach37 · · Score: 1

      but unless your taste in music changes every 30 seconds,

      I don't know... the way pop music on the radio is these days....

  24. Three words: by winkydink · · Score: 1

    Different business units.

    One make mp3 players. another makes flash memory. While the mp3 player biz will probably get some preferential treatment, the flash guys have revenue quotas, just like everybody else.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Three words: by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Different business units.

      Definitely. I'd rather see a company like Samsung who is able to keep its business divisions separate rather than try to hobble one division in a vain attempt to help another. Samsung is big in consumer electronics, but they shouldn't hobble their semiconductor business just because they think a particular buyer is going to compete against them, because those competitors generally have alternative sources, so if Samsung's chips are in a competitor's device, it is still a win for Samsung.

      For instance, Sony made the wrong choice in flash and drive players to force users to transcode mp3 to ATRAC just to protect its music interests, and as such, they placed very poorly in the market for those devices everywhere in the world except Japan.

  25. Zzz by jolar · · Score: 0

    Ah, the Apple rumor-mill. I wonder how many kool-aid drinkers who already own 4GB iPods will go out and buy a 4GB Flash iPod if/when they get released to get an extra two hours of battery life and a product that's an ounce lighter than what they had before. Does anyone really care about how light they are? 3.6 ounces is nothing.

  26. I'd love to have a CD iPod... by zlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...or even a DVD-iPod.
    What I don't like about harddrives is that thowing them around isn't good at all. In addition, they rotate at 5200 RPMs at minimum which isn't good for the battery. And constantly stopping the drive reduces its life rapidly. Actually, shutting down (even correctly!) a harddisk is the most damaging thing that can happen to it.
    Flash memory is slow to write, and it wears off in rewrite cycles. Actually, all Siemens S45i phones I've seen had their flash memory broken because the phone constantly rewrote the addressbook. If you buy a flashdrive, it will probably have a notice about it supporting no more than 1000-10000 rewrites.
    I don't know if there's any progress happening, but I'm know that it was the situation 3 years ago .
    CDs on the other hand can be easily thrown away if broken.
    Also, they can have DRM that doesn't discriminate the user:
    for example, for each song recorded there can be an included license for the specific playback device. The song can have the license included directly at iTunes Store and then burned to the CD without having to be saved anywhere at the harddisk. The user can be allowed to copy the CD because it won't play on any device except the one listed in the license.

    1. Re:I'd love to have a CD iPod... by Rycross · · Score: 1

      There's plenty of CD players out there that will allow you to burn a CD full of MP3s and play it. I have one. The only problem with them are that they are as big as a normal CD player. I'm not sure if they have made any for DVD, as I now just use my iRiver.

    2. Re:I'd love to have a CD iPod... by zlogic · · Score: 1

      Well, that's the point. In my opinion, Apple in number one in usability and iRiver is number two. Yes, they make great hardware and decent software but I like Apple more.
      I may be wrong but Apple just feels better.

    3. Re:I'd love to have a CD iPod... by Lepton68 · · Score: 1
      Technology changes fast. The new Samsung 1.8" mini flash drives (same/similar chips Apple will use I assume) use five percent of the power of a magnetic hard disk. The new 70nm technology Samsung chips in question are fast - 57MB/s read, 16MB/s write. And they expect to double the density of these chips every 12 months. Current generation Samsung chips last 100K write cycles minimum. Some chips claim to go as high as 5 million cycles. I didn't see a spec for the specific new Samsung chips.

      But let's say it is just 100,000 cycles minimum. Once you wrote the same sector 100K times, it's gone. Yikes! If you completely rewrite your iPod twice a day, it will only last for 130 years.

      --
      Mike from www.myallo.com/blog
    4. Re:I'd love to have a CD iPod... by damiam · · Score: 1
      CDs are much, much, slower to write than flash memory, and have fewer rewrite cycles. 10000 rewrites isn't a problem in an MP3 player; at one sync a day that's three decades before you begin running into problems, and that's only if you completely rewrite the whole drive with each sync (which of course isn't the case).

      And I don't know what you're talking about with CDs and DRM, but DRM-wise there's nothing CDs can do that a flash or HD based player can't.

      The only real advantage for an MP3-CD player over a flash/HD player is cost. And maybe the fact that you can buy a CD straight off the shelf and play it without having to rip it first, but that's pretty trivial.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    5. Re:I'd love to have a CD iPod... by Sirdar+Bey · · Score: 0
      actually, i think all of the ipod drives are 4200rpm, not 5400rpm.

      the s45i came out ages ago.

      if you buy a flash drive it will have no such notices as technology has evolved and people have developed ways to circumvent those limitations. also most flash memory is between 20x and 40x the speed it was 5 years ago. i suspect that number will increase.

      cds suck. they scratch, they don't hold all that much, and i'll take solid state over spinny shit any day of the week.

    6. Re:I'd love to have a CD iPod... by nunchux · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine Apple would go in that direction-- frankly MP3 CDs are last decade's technology.

      Portable CD players are as fragile, if not more so than hard drive players. I've burned through three of them, all name brands treated with normal care and none last more than a year. The mechanism is simply too fragile for a portable device, which is why they never caught on like the far more reliable cassette players and flash/hard drive devices. (Cassette "walkmen" were still outselling portable CD players in that device's heyday, and that's long after the labels gave up on the tape format.)

      Portable CD players are also a pain to listen to unless you're standing perfectly still-- a speed bump or sharp turn in the car, or even walking at a regular pace can skip the tracks. Really, if you don't hold them level you're asking for failure, forget about carrying it by your side, in a bag, etc. Or in your pocket, where they probably wouldn't fit anyway.

      The only benefit MP3 CD players have is price. But CDs are a pain to burn, are ruined by a minor scratch and are prone to degrade (especially the ones you burn yourself.) Hard drive players aren't indestructable (and aren't cheap!) but they hold up better. Flash is best-- my Shuffle is a fifth the size of my last portable CD player and has been subject to much more abuse than I would dream of putting a CD player through, and hasn't missed a beat.

    7. Re:I'd love to have a CD iPod... by isotpist · · Score: 1

      A CD iPod?

      You mean like the one I bought from Sony 20 years ago, I think it was called a Diskman.
      Seriously, WTF? Anything based on a CD has to be at least as big as a CD (bigger than any iPod) and way more fragile when in use than a HD-based iPod. My diskman used to skip when walking, let alone jogging, why would Apple do that?

    8. Re:I'd love to have a CD iPod... by zlogic · · Score: 1

      A CD-MP3/AAC/WMA/OGG whatever iPod.
      I think traditional CD-Audio players are no longer made by anyone.
      And your diskman skipped because it didn't buffer anything. I have a Diskman like that in my garage and I completely understand what you mean. Antishock memory buffering has been introduced about 8 years ago.

  27. All things being equal... by suitepotato · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...which has the best MTBF Vs. Cost? Flash or HD?

    Given the history of CF cards on my digital camera, I'm not going to rush out when this releases. Anyone got some good hard data on which rules for this sort of thing and not "well, Apple must have done their homework if they're doing it". I leave everything before Mac OSX as evidence that they ain't perfect.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:All things being equal... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      OT subject nit: all things are never equal. (Chairs aren't tables.)

      What you're reaching for is "All other things being equal...", which means "change this one variable and that is the result."

      Now mod me down so I can be more powerful than hot grits, or something.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  28. In related news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "An unconfirmed report today from Reuters quotes an industry analyst firm iSuppli as saying that Apple plans to buy as much as 40 percent of Samsung's second-half flash memory output."

    In related news, iSuppli's shares in Samsung skyrocket.

  29. Re:too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    stop freeloading then. (see: copyright infringement)

  30. 'Upgrading' existing ipods? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Any chance of replacing sick ( or just power hungry ) disk drives in current models with flash ?

    Though, im sure they will be different enough to force you to buy new...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:'Upgrading' existing ipods? by Sirdar+Bey · · Score: 0
      yes, they will force you to buy new.

      the flash iPods will come out, and like the Nazis used gun registration records to go disarm the people they didn't want armed, Apple will use the iPod warantee registration records to hunt you down and FORCE you to fork over $$$ to replace your hard drive based iPod with the newer flash version.

      they'll probably do the same with x86 based Macs.

  31. I LOVE FLASH MEMORY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember 10 years ago when people were debating if it could even be done. Now it is so everywhere! I just bought a 1G SD card for $70(US) WOW!
    I can just see the new mini's ad:

    Now with even less moving parts!

    ---

    my confirmation word is : paints

  32. Re:too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know what kind of internets you've been logging onto lately but on mine, OGG is still pretty rare to come by. Besides if you are geek enough to want OGG support, you are geek enough to use iPod Linux and make it play whatever you want.

  33. If I only had mod points... by DesScorp · · Score: 0

    ...troll or no, that's the funniest damn thing I've read all day. Thank you :)

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  34. Re:Talk about a news flash.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you are not funny, please shoot yourself in the face.

  35. Cost issues by zeitgeist_chaser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Flash is far more expensive per unit of memory than disk drives. Engadget.com is estimating that Apple might get as much as a 50% price reduction from Samsung. However, even at such a sharply reduced cost, a 20GB flash iPod would likely cost ~$500 or more. The current market surely won't support such an expensive 20GB MP3 player.

    --
    While thinking philosophically, we see problems in places where there are none. -Wittgenstein
    1. Re:Cost issues by schtum · · Score: 1

      The current market surely won't support such an expensive 20GB MP3 player.

      That sounds suspiciously like that famous slashdot quote about the original ipod. $500 for 20GB of flash in an ultrathin iPod with 24+ hours of battery life and bragging rights? Priceless. The terminally poor (like me) will have to wait for prices to drop, but we'll be content to drool over them in the meantime. Apple better make those cases waterproof.

  36. Re:too bad by multiplexo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    OGG is widely used for distributing music on bittorent based sites, and it's annoying to have to convert it to mp3 or aac...

    And here's a great big reason why Apple doesn't support Ogg Vorbis (besides the fact that it doesn't do anything for you that MP3 doesn't), it's widely used for distributing music on bittorrent based sites, that is to say that it is widely used in piracy, and Apple doesn't need to get assfucked by the RIAA over iPod sales for a bunch of geeks, especially after the Grokster decision.

    --
    cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
  37. OH PLEASE by robyannetta · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    OH PLEASE let this new iPod play FLAC and OGG files.

    Are you listening, Apple? I'll actually money on you!

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    1. Re:OH PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "money on you"? Is that some new slang for golden showers?

    2. Re:OH PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahaha. when i read that the first thing i thought of was "money shot".

  38. Its called iGo by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Mobility Electronics aka iGo sells the universal charger you're looking for. Buy one converter and a tip to match each of your electronic devices. They even sell a base model which can plug into AC/Car/Plane, so you're even less likely to be without power. I've got one for my Dell laptop, and tips for my PDA and cellphone. Nifty and convenient, but expensive ($100 for the converter, $10 for the tips).

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    1. Re:Its called iGo by desenz · · Score: 1

      If you can go without the laptop power, the "Igo Everywhere" is only 60. Powers anything smaller like MP3 players, cells, games.

  39. Re:Snappier? No, flashier! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  40. Mini-Disc by Alistar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ok, I have to wonder, why these never caught on. I have a mini-disc player and I love it.

    I get 30 hours off of one AA, 15 off the rechargable.
    I can throw my MP3's on it easily, (sonicstage sure, stupid program, but its easy)
    I pay $5 for 1GB discs and it came with one.
    Playlist management on the device.
    Plus I can record through a mic to it, transfer back and forth and whatnot.
    It has never skipped for me.
    They are fairly small, smaller than an IPod.
    USB, optical or stereo jack in.
    Anyway, yea, I would love to be enlightened

    1. Re:Mini-Disc by koreaman · · Score: 0

      You have to carry your disks around. Same reason iPods (or similar devices) are better than Walkmen.

    2. Re:Mini-Disc by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anyway, yea, I would love to be enlightened

      No problem.

      1. ipods run MP3's natively. No encoding to a proprietary format (ATRAC) and losing quality as with minidisc.

      2. "sonicstage sure, stupid program, but its easy" Meet iTunes. It's not stupid, it's quite awesome, and quite easy. And it's a great portal into a digital music store.

      3. You have to use interchangeable discs. My iPod has 40GB. I have 5000 songs, over a dozen audiobooks, and now a dozen constantly synced podcasts on this thing. I drive a lot, and what I feel like listening to at any given moment can change frequently.

      4. You can use ipods like portable hard drives. Because they are.

      5. Apple engineering. Sorry, the iPods are a thing of beauty and great UI. This counts, A LOT.

      6. Marketing. iPods are hip. MDs were never hip. Yeah, this counts as well. When you see white headphones, you know there's an ipod on the other end. Steve Jobs is fucking brilliant at marketing.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    3. Re:Mini-Disc by fiftyfly · · Score: 1
      easy. it's sonicstage (stupid). It only 'works' under windows, and there's no realiable way to use the bloody thing without it. I'm not some kind of anti windows zealot, heck there's 2 machines running 2k in my cavement.... right over by the BSD routers, the mac mini, the debian server, the mythtv box and the small stack of ibooks.

      I spend much of my time working, not with applications, but services accessible with clients available to all of those systems. If it's not crossplatform, or at least not highly interoperable, I'm not interested.

      --
      "Sanity is not statistical", George Orwell, "1984"
    4. Re:Mini-Disc by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      In some ways, you are right, MD players are very nifty. I have owned two portable MD players and they've taken several drops to concrete and still worked. Eventually the battery door hinge broke on one, though the device still works.

      Being able to store MP3s on them is a very recent development, before they required ATRAC files, which was an asinine requirement.

      But still, being able to shuffle through more than a small fraction of a music collection is more important to me.

      I might look into one of the larger capacity MD devices for my next portable device. 1GB per disc is nice to have.

    5. Re:Mini-Disc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Plus I can record through a mic to it, transfer back and forth and whatnot.

      That's the feature I love about my MD player and the one I'd most miss should I switch to an MP3 player. The ability to record an entire episode of "Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me" or "Car Talk" and then listen to it at the gym with such simplicity is something I don't want to lose should I ever switch to an MP3 player. Until NPR start podcasting for free, I'll happily stick with my minidisc player.

    6. Re:Mini-Disc by zakezuke · · Score: 1

      Ok, I have to wonder, why these never caught on. I have a mini-disc player and I love it.

      I got one for my newphew at one point in history. To copy music to it required a usb dongle and some sort of optical connection, and recording to it was in real time. This had to have been 8 years ago or so, back when CD-Rs were for sale in 4x or 8x varities. I was shocked about this fact. Keep in mind this was an early generation MD Discman.

      But anyways... these days CD-R is up above and beyond 40x. A full cd burn can take as little as 2min without a problem. I'm not sure about CD3 but I imagine one of those can be made in about 1min. I don't have an accurate price for CD3, but I know I can get hockey rink CD-Rs for $30 per 100pack. I would expect that CD3s would float at about 20c to 50c each depending on where you shop. Regular CDs are in the same price bracket. while I know of very few cd3 mp3 players, normal walkmen style CD players can play them without a hitch. Portable CD mp3 players cost as low as $20, but $50 is a typical price.

      Minidisc I expect to spend $2.00 each for them on a good day.

      So.. I could either buy into a MD recorder at a price of $100ish and media at $2.00ish each. I assume slower recording that CD-r but I could be wrong as i'm out of touch. But a device only useful for one thing... playing portable music.

      or

      I could buy a burner at $30ish, a portable player at $20ish, and media at squatish. There is no real price advantage going CD3 over CD5, and CD5. There is an advantage with the fact that if I don't already have a CD burner it's useful for more things than music.

      Unless I needed recording in the field, something that MD does very well, I simply must say a good reason why sony MD didn't catch on was the fact that with the exception of that feature, it was pretty redundent.

      Don't get me wrong... they are a nice standard. I would have bought into one in a heart beat if I could buy a drive to replace my floppy for $100ish or so. Perhaps then we wouldn't have this stilly trivial war about zip and superdisc. The only reason I was not hip to them was the fact that I was more hip to multi purpose media.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    7. Re:Mini-Disc by Alistar · · Score: 1

      Well, with the new Mini-disc I have, the disc shows up as a mountable drive on my computer. I can place any files in there, but most of the time I can also throw MP3s in there and the device picks them up. Though some of them don't work, I don't know why.

      And as for all 40GB in one, well I guess its about preferences, I like just having discs with certain compilations on them myself.

    8. Re:Mini-Disc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MP3 is a proprietary format.

    9. Re:Mini-Disc by ray9x · · Score: 2, Informative

      NPR already offers some podcasts for free.
      You may want to check with your local NPR station for more podcasts. I know that KCRW here in L.A. already has a majority of their programs (including the music shows) up for download.

      --
      .-.
    10. Re:Mini-Disc by Tim+Browse · · Score: 1
      I can also throw MP3s in there and the device picks them up. Though some of them don't work, I don't know why.

      Maybe they're VBR? Just a guess.

    11. Re:Mini-Disc by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      And as for all 40GB in one, well I guess its about preferences, I like just having discs with certain compilations on them myself.

      So...you'd rather carry around 20 (or 60, or 40 in my case) separate discs, all for the sake of keeping your music...separare? Buy an iPod and create dozens playlists. You can keep your music separate and it's much simpler to "switch discs" when you don't actually have to switch anything.

      I still own an MD player, but it gets zero use now that I've got an iPod. It's more convenient ant useful in almost every way. Don't knock auto-sunchronization until you've known its benefits...it's VERY useful when you've got tens of GBs of music.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    12. Re:Mini-Disc by Alistar · · Score: 1

      Well actually, my music collection is very small, I carry around 3 disc and it has it all on it. You are probably right though, if I had 40 GB, I would get an IPod

    13. Re:Mini-Disc by dublin · · Score: 1

      No problem.

      1. ipods run MP3's natively. No encoding to a proprietary format (ATRAC) and losing quality as with minidisc.


      But not WMA, Ogg, FLAC, WAV, etc., if you care about any of those...

      2. "sonicstage sure, stupid program, but its easy" Meet iTunes. It's not stupid, it's quite awesome, and quite easy. And it's a great portal into a digital music store.

      Easy, sure, but pretty much a ball and chain, especially if you actually use that digital music store, which will happily sell you songs all day at approx 8x the price of the best legal alternative site that doesn't insist on onerous DRM, but will sell you most music in a huge variety of MP3 formats, and some music in alternative formats such as those mentioned above - even lossless formats. Apple's DRM won't look so innocuous when you realize a couple of computers or music players down the road that you have to buy the music *again*...

      I've never understood why the people in this community are so willing to accept Apple's extremely proprietary architecture and DRM schemes. I actually have no problem with DRM, if I could actually *own* whatever I buy, and (if I've authorized it) even sell it or give it away.

      I love the iPod's design and UI, but I may never buy one because of this.

      3. You have to use interchangeable discs. My iPod has 40GB. I have 5000 songs, over a dozen audiobooks, and now a dozen constantly synced podcasts on this thing. I drive a lot, and what I feel like listening to at any given moment can change frequently.

      Advantage over Minidisc, sure, but not over the many other HDD music players.

      4. You can use ipods like portable hard drives. Because they are.

      Again, like many others, *if* you remember the special USB cable...

      5. Apple engineering. Sorry, the iPods are a thing of beauty and great UI. This counts, A LOT.

      Granted, Apple does this really well, but Creative and others are finally starting to get close. Dell will never get it.

      6. Marketing. iPods are hip. MDs were never hip. Yeah, this counts as well. When you see white headphones, you know there's an ipod on the other end. Steve Jobs is f---ing brilliant at marketing.

      Absolutely.

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    14. Re:Mini-Disc by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Oh? You have a suggestion for a better device than the iPod then? I had been looking up iPod alternatives for a friend, and I could not find any that would even play AAC (a requirement, since his collection is currently in MP3 and AAC). Playback in the formats you listed would be nice, but not a requirement.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    15. Re:Mini-Disc by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 1

      At that size of music collection, I will admit a MD player can provide competition to the iPod. While the iPod mini is still smaller and (in my opinion) blessed with a better interface, the Hi-MD players are (correct me if I'm wrong) less expensive, and I have always been in awe of the amazing battery life Sony has managed over both their MD and CD lines.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    16. Re:Mini-Disc by Maserati · · Score: 2, Informative

      But not WMA, Ogg, FLAC, WAV, etc., if you care about any of those...

      And your minidisk player does ? If you try to transfer a WAV to an iPod, ti will complain. But iTunes will also make an MP3 out of it with a right-click. And there are Mac and Windows extensions to enable Ogg support. Apparently the Windows project on Sourceforge is moribund.

      I've never understood why the people in this community are so willing to accept Apple's extremely proprietary architecture

      Oh come on, iTunes is perfectly happy to index your existing music folders and not touch a file. Or you can let it manage one. If you stop using it, all your rips have nice, clean ID3 tags and your library is a structured folder full of whatever format you rip in. iTunes 4.9 will rip in MP3, AIFF, Apple Lossless, AAC and WAV; all at a wide-variety of settings. That's four wide-open formats (minus the patent issue with MP3s). And it puts them into well named. It'll even play those MP3s from the leading DRM-friendly online music store.

      Once you've ripped in your favorite format you can then burn audio CDs, data CDs (backups, unlimited burns) and MP3 discs that many, many players will handle.

      WTF about that architecture is "extremely proprietary" ? I see you have deep philosophical issues with the iTunes Store. I respect that. But if you factor out the objectionable parts, and there are legitimate objections, they have produced a system with very little lockdown built in.

      Yes, a successful DRM scheme is something to be concerned about. But a) it isn't mandatory, b) isn't so bad, and c) has an escape route (with a moderate quality loss) by burning audio CDs. Store music CDs plays fine on anything that doesn't reveal flaws in real CDs so it's a real escape. And I consider it to be a fair discount over new CDs given the quality and DRM issues.

      As for "sell or give away" for Store tracks, you can burn those to audio CDs and give 'em away. Last I checked it was... seven (?) burns for a playlist ? You could also create an account to do nothing else than buy some music and then sell the account later. You'll also need to provide a copy of the .m4p files - which iTunes will cheerfully burn to a DVD for you.

      Just don't use Apple's store. iPods are fundamentally disc drives and their library can be written to by programs other than iTunes. iTunes itself, as discussed, has no lock-in and reads and writes a variery of formats. The biggest problem with having the store available is that it's so damned convenient to drop $0.99 on a song that gets stuck in your head.

      Ok, and the Windows version is annoying. Most Windows software is. And I have no idea if it will talk to your minidisc burner, maybe mounting a virtual ISO and then burning that will work for you. The Windows version uses a lot of the Quicktime API and not Win32 so much and so might not see the minidisc as a generic device for burning.

      Lastly, do post a link to the "best legal alternative site that doesn't insist on onerous DRM". What's their catalog like ? Publicize the heck out of it (word of mouth is the best advertising) and give the market a chance to work. Link me up baby.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
    17. Re:Mini-Disc by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Because I didn't see anyone explicitly saying so in the other replies:

      Hi-MD came out too late to draw enough folks away from hard drive based players. Back then Sonicstage was buggy and more restrictive than today. There's also a lot of techy folks who don't like Sony being a proprietary dick with stuff like Memory Sticks and so refuse to buy their cameras, and some extend that to boycotting all their electronics.

    18. Re:Mini-Disc by Winterblink · · Score: 1

      I have a Minidisc unit, it's a great device. But frankly the thing that killed it for me was the removable media. I agree with every single one of your points, but being able to carry around my entire music collection instead of wielding it a portion at a time was the thing that killed MD for me. I still have the unit, it's just gathering dust on a shelf somewhere.

      The iPod+iTunes combination is also so dirt simple, yet flexible, that it trumps any music management software MD has/had. I can rip a CD, put my iPod in its dock, and it's ready to go five seconds later. The best part about it is the MP3s I get from it I can use anywhere, or do it to AAC and enjoy audio quality that surpasses my MD.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    19. Re:Mini-Disc by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      Easy, sure, but pretty much a ball and chain, especially if you actually use that digital music store, which will happily sell you songs all day at approx 8x the price of the best legal alternative site that doesn't insist on onerous DRM, but will sell you most music in a huge variety of MP3 formats, and some music in alternative formats such as those mentioned above - even lossless formats.

      I can only assume you mean allofmp3.com, which is not legally selling that music, any more than pirates on the streets of NYC and Shanghai are legally selling $5 DVDs.

      Apple's DRM won't look so innocuous when you realize a couple of computers or music players down the road that you have to buy the music *again*...

      You are ignorant of how Apple DRM works. I have my itunes music playing on 5 different computers and half a dozen different ipods. No need to buy them again, ever. When I am done with my computer and want to upgrade, I just deauthorize the computer and authorize the new one.

      If I am feeling paranoid, I burn the album to CD and store it away.

      I've never understood why the people in this community are so willing to accept Apple's extremely proprietary architecture and DRM schemes.

      What does "extremely proprietary" mean? How does it differ from plain old "proprietary"? Just curious.

      The reason we put up with Apple's DRM scheme is simple -- it is the best solution available for legally purchased digital music, in our opinion.

      Again, like many others, *if* you remember the special USB cable...

      Yeah I am not implying these features are not common, I was explaining why ipods took off compared to MD players.

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    20. Re:Mini-Disc by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Sony PSP's with the 2.0 firmware will play DRM-less AAC (you have to change the extension to mp4)

    21. Re:Mini-Disc by shrykk · · Score: 1

      1. ipods run MP3's natively...

      Your points all make sense, but bear in mind that minidisc players came along when most of us were happy with our tape decks.

      Those clued in on minidisc (I wasn't one of them) were effectively enjoying most of the benefits of having an iPod since, when? 1995? Maybe '97 or so when the benefits of the internet became apparent to everyone. Whereas iPods didn't become really big worldwide until, well, maybe two years ago.

      --
      #define struct union /* Reduce memory usage */
    22. Re:Mini-Disc by morgue-ann · · Score: 1

      I record NPR and PRI shows via RealAudio streams to .m4b (bookmarkable AAC) using Audio Hijack Pro on a Mac mini. I used to use Total Recorder Pro on Windows. TRP worked, but AHP has better auto-naming facilities so I can be lazy about deleting old stuff & still find the new. It also is able to "hijack" just RealPlayer's PCM output so I can use the computer for other audio stuff. TRP pretends to be a soundcard driver, so any other audio is recorded too.

      Finding a stream with a high enough bitrate to sound good that stays up during a popular show like Car Talk is tricky, but doable.

      I'll be switching to an FM tuner with an outdoor Winegard PR-6000 aimed at KQED and an Edirol UA-1A (out of production so I've linked the similar UA-1EX).

      Outdoor antennas are cheap. A good chimney mount is going to double my cost, but the total is still cheaper than an indoor Terk & it'll actually work. If the PR-6000 or PR-5030 can't pull in that distant station Antenna Performance Specialties makes what many claim are the best around. $219 for the APS-13 might seem like a lot, but compared to an Audible.com or Sirius subscription, it's not too bad & a good strong FM signal sounds pretty good below 15kHz. I'm tempted to get one of these just for pure outrageousness of a 200" boom, but it's overkill for KQED from Santa Cruz-- need a rotor to really justify it.

      I'll be using a cool 70's brushed-aluminum-faceplate Kenwood KT-5300 with analog "big knob" tuning that I got for $30 before I found the crazy FM DXers page that reviews every old radio & has info or links on tweaking them for better selectivity.

      If I end up wanting to record another station, rather than getting a Radio Shark and hacking on an external antenna connector, I plan to just get more tuners & switch them with a repurposed Keyspan USB->serial adapter and some relays.

  41. Re:Snappier? No, flashier! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's only an in-joke amongst slashdot Mac users. To your regular run-of-the-mill Mac user it's the truth (or gospel depending on how you swing).

  42. Re:Talk about a news flash.... by Radres · · Score: 1

    *sniff* and I tried so hard!

  43. Re:too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Those idiots who distribute music that cannot be played on a majority of the world's digital music players are the problem, not Apple.

  44. Three more words: by Bearpaw · · Score: 1
    Bigger market share.

    There'd be no point to Samsung hoarding memory to themselves if they can't sell it. As things are now, best case scenario, Samsung might be able to wrangle a somewhat bigger minority share of the mp3 player market. If they cut this deal with Apple, Samsung gets to benefit from Apple's huge share.

    1. Re:Three more words: by twiddlingbits · · Score: 1

      Spare Fab Capacity What do you want to bet the Fabs for the Flash are not running full out? Or that Samsung has some spare capacity at Fabs they can convert to make Flash. That way they can increase efficiency of the Fab, lower costs per item, supply Apple and thier own sister division.

  45. Seemed like a great idea because storage not all by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It only seems like a bad idea if you think only in terms of raw storage space. In the end the choice between a Mini and the full sized iPod is also one of form factor, where the significantly smaller size adds a lot of value, especially if people are not going to be listening to more than 4GB of music anyway (every person has an amount of storage beyond which nothing is useful).

    I don't think using Flash will increase price. What I thgink will happen in the new flash iPods will be smaller still, with longer battery life - at the same price as the old Mini. Alternatley (depending on how cheap it is to buy in that large a quantity) I could see all of the above being true plus perhaps expanding storage to 8GB (by using two) instead of 4GB - it could even cost the same as larger iPods though and it wouldn't matter, since again the forma factor is different enough to make it a factor. Even if they were the same price I might well choose the Mini over a larger iPod (especially if one is flash and one not or battery life is dramatically different).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  46. Re:too bad by damiam · · Score: 1

    Not nearly as widely used as MP3, and that didn't stop Apple from supporting it.

    --
    It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
  47. This just in! by NIN1385 · · Score: 1
    Apple plans to buy an orange.

    That is all.

    --

    If carrots got you drunk, rabbits would be fucked up. - Comedian Mitch Hedberg R.I.P. 03/30/68-2/24/05
  48. It ain't gonna happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure this will happen. Just as soon as Apple gets a multi-button mou...
    or goes with x86 architectu...
    or creates a UNIX-based operating syst...

  49. Quote from Samsung CEO by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Steve Jobs is always after me Lucky Charms!"

    1. Re:Quote from Samsung CEO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wahahaha maybe i'm delirious with exhaustion, but that made me spit out my drink hahahahaha

  50. internal flash hdd by E8086 · · Score: 1

    oh look, apple's making more ipods, with larger capacities and maybe thinner nothing new to see here.
    How long until all that flash memory makes its way into a part flash, part magnetic hdd. The kind that can have almost instant standby and resume. Will need to have at least 6-10gb of flash memory. It will be nice when we can finally buy a 10/500gb hdd
    (10 flash, 500 magnetic)

    --
    F7 doesn't work, ignore spelling and grammar
  51. Who the hell are iSuppli? by NekoXP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're making a name for themselves this week! Lots of rumours and speculation
    over Apple. I sense backhanders in return for hype :)

    Bad journalism or maybe just useless English composition skills: it is rumoured
    that Apple want flash memory. Then they say they *WILL* be used in 4GB iPod
    Mini's. How can you have an unconfirmed rumour and attach such certainty in it?

    Neko

  52. Re:too bad by Sirdar+Bey · · Score: 0
    right, cos mp3s are never used in piracy. ever.

    oh wait, that's right, the VAST MAJORITY of pirated sound files are MP3s.

  53. smaller than an iPod? by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    A mini-disc player is larger than an iPod mini.
    The (2nd gen, since February) iPod mini plays "18 hours" (tests show more like 25) on the internal rechargeable battery.
    An iPod mini holds 4X as much (although it cannot be swapped).
    It actually does take mp3s, and fast. Unlike the mini-disc which has to convert them. Slowly, using that awful software.
    It has playlist management on the device.
    iPod Mini cannot record.
    iPod mini doesn't skip either.
    It's smaller than the mini-disc player.
    It has USB in only.

    And it works with a good program, iTunes, not a crappy one.

    I'm not saying what you have isn't serviceable. But if you used the iPod Mini, you'd be able to tell the difference, you'd understand.

    Mini-disc was doing very well in many countries outside the US. Its market share is now a tiny sliver of the market with the release of good mp3 players like the iPod mini. Even in Japan, Mini-Disc is over now.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  54. used to get a million... by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    When flash was SLC (stored a single bit per cell). Now NAND flash stores multiple bits per cell (2 bits, 4 values) and the lifetime of the cell is rated at 10,000 writes instead of 100,000. Now I can agree you'll likely get a lot more writes than that, but it'll be more like 100,000 instead of the 1,000,000 you quote.

    NAND flash systems use wear levelling, so they spread out that wear, and the flash should last a long time. I still think a hard drive would last longer, but I dunno.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  55. Performance per Watt by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will this improve their Performance/Watt rating?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  56. Too little too late by Andy_R · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm an Apple zealot, I'm typing this on a Mac Mini, and I'm going to be clicking submit with my one mouse button, but there is no way I'll be buying a flash-based iPod. My free upgrade phone is on order (a Sony Ericsson K750), it has a USB connector, plays mp3s and takes a Memory Stick Duo Pro card (currently maxing out at 2Gb, but 4Gb version promised soon).

    By the time Apple gets to market, I'll have all it's functionality plus the ESSENTIAL feature of automatically stopping playing when my phone rings, just by adding a card to my phone - which also has the simple game play and video playback functionality that is missing from iPods (even if Sony forgot to add a usable fast forward/rewind or pause button).

    I'd love have an Apple device in my pocket, because they get the user interface right in ways that Sony Ericsson can't be bothered to think about, but until they have a LOT more functionality, I can't justify buying one.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    1. Re:Too little too late by jerk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've had a K750i for 4 months now and I can tell you that it will not replace an iPod. Unless you upgrade the ROM to the W800 ROM, you won't have sorting capabilities (artist, album, etc), 1GB+ Duo sticks are expensive, and unless you get a dongle, you're stuck with the crap headphones included with the phone. The battery life on the K750i isn't the greatest, either. While mp3 listening uses less battery, you won't be using it much if you value having a low battery. There's a workaround for the kernel panic the K750i causes when you disconnect it via USB (I always use Bluetooth) that you'll need to read about.

      The K750i is a great phone with a great camera, but it's not a good mp3 player. Oh, you'll use the FM radio even less than the mp3 player.

    2. Re:Too little too late by duslow · · Score: 1

      Judging from the success of the iPod, Apple has shown that "jack of all trades expert at nothing" devices are not what all customers want. Integration is one thing, but quality is another. The iPod does one thing best and that is to be an audio player. I just hope Apple doesn't sway to far with the iPod and turn it into a jack of all trades devices.

    3. Re:Too little too late by Andy_R · · Score: 1

      That's a very hasty conclusion to draw, many more people don't have an ipod than do!

      The problem with jack of all trades devices is partly that there is always at least one important part missing (in the K750's case it's missing a usable web browser, the PSP misses out the phone, etc), but mostly that they botch many of the parts, as the rather scathing review of the K750 pasted above makes clear. Apple could make a killing with their user interface skills by making an all-in-one that actually works well.

      --
      A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
    4. Re:Too little too late by rising_hope · · Score: 1

      For all those same reasons I considered using my Nokia 6620 phone as an MP3 player. With 2GB MMC cards available, it would have roughly half the size of my 4GB iPod, and be all in one. I can browse the internet on it using Opera 8, download all kinds of cool apps, play all kinds of Java games, play a TON of native 6620 games that actually have pretty awesome graphics for a phone, have a color screen, a simple UI, be stable and reliable, and I'd always have my music with me. But, the more I thought about it, I decided that a seperate device that kept it simple made more sense. Why? For a number of reasons. Apple's device is like iTunes for the road. I love the smart playlists, the ability to sync perfectly with the utterly kick ass iTunes, the ability to keep in sync with the latest podcasts now, without the use of other software and having to manage a seperate MP3 directory, the ability to quickly adjust volume, and be able to navigate long audio tracks quickly (this feature alone cannot be overlooked. I recored a lot of music from streaming music, and when you have 30 minute segments, being able to just roll around for about 5 seconds, versus holding down a button for a minute or two just to get 5-10 minutes forward), and the availibility of a lot of sports orientated holders. I generally use my iPod at the gym, or out jogging. It's not a time when I want to be interupted by phone calls anyway. I like it being mounted to my arm, so I can easily navigate the dials, skipping songs, adjusting volume. I like that it has a button lock, so that I don't accidently track forward, too. I like that I don't waste my time trying to fuss with copying MP3s, and not having them catagorized, or have smart playlists, or being able to play by genre. To me, the time and frustration I saved myself in getting an iPod was well worth the $200 investment over having to fuss with all in one devices. Perhaps if the new N91 were here, I might consider otherwise, as it looks to be a music orientated cell phone in a very compact size with the same great Symbian OS that I know and love. But, until then, there's no convincing me that any all-in-one phone out there can match the ease and simplicity and one-purpose design of the iPod. Apple has always been successful sticking to the old adage, "Keep it simple, stupid." No fuss, no muss - it just works, like you'd think it should.

  57. i think the interesting news here by utexaspunk · · Score: 4, Interesting

    is that if apple buys up 40% of their production, they're likely to seriously increase their production in the next year, and the market will likely be flooded in a couple years. it has been a long time coming, but flash ram is about to undergo a serious price drop. combined with continual improvements in scaling and capacity, perhaps this means we'll have 40GB flash drives by 2007. that ought to shake things up a bit...

  58. Why is Samsung willing to do this? by ase · · Score: 1

    The last I heard, Samsung was looking to increase its portable music player marketshare in 2006 to something like 10%, and become the dominant player (no pun intended) in the market by the end of 2007. If so, why sell cheap memory to its biggest competitor?

    1. Re:Why is Samsung willing to do this? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Because if iPods use Samsung memory, then they do become the dominant player in the market!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    2. Re:Why is Samsung willing to do this? by ase · · Score: 1

      But Samsung make their own players. They are competing against themselves.

    3. Re:Why is Samsung willing to do this? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      So what? They're still making more money than they would otherwise. Think about it this way: when people buy their player, they profit. When people buy their competitor's player, they still profit. They win either way!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  59. iPod has 4 games. by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    K750i is an okay phone. It's no iPod, but I can see where you're coming from here.

    The k750i doesn't even have a proper headphone jack. Pretty crazy for a music player, eh?

    I don't know what your idea that iPods don't have game play functionality. iPods currently have 4 games on them. Honestly, if you ask me, that's 4 too many. But either way, I don't see how you can say they don't have it.

    For the price of that 2GB MS Pro Duo, you could pretty much have an iPod.

    I'd have a k750i if it had GSM 850. But I know it wouldn't replace my iPod. I like to leave my iPod in the car when I go inside the store, or even play music from it at home. I'd prefer to have my phone in my pocket while doing these things.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:iPod has 4 games. by cakesy · · Score: 1

      You want a Motorola E1000 - accepts transflash card, has a stereo headphone jack, plays mp3s(as well as movies- and records them, 1.2mpixel camera) Moto E1000

  60. It's a porno stunt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an amazing feat of psychopathic proctology, which no sane woman would attempt for any amount of money. But there are a few crazy and very elastic porno actresses, probably with heroin addictions to feed, so...

    Google "Ashley Blue" for further details.

  61. current mini hard drive: $500 by bach37 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    $200 for a flash drive is nothing.
    The current Hitiachi drive alone in the mini is $500.

    1. Re:current mini hard drive: $500 by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Wow, you sure have a nose for a bad deal. A froogle search shows that just about every other company besides the one you're linking to sells them for at least $150 less.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:current mini hard drive: $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the point of the parent posted by a mile.

    3. Re:current mini hard drive: $500 by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      You missed the point of the parent posted by a mile.

      No, I didn't. The drive in the ipod mini wouldn't cost a smart consumer anywhere near $500. It certainly doesn't cost Apple $500 in the volumes they're buying.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    4. Re:current mini hard drive: $500 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I didn't.

      My, this not difficult at all. Just read the conversation I was responding to, instead of jumping into the middle of things.

      It certainly doesn't cost Apple $500 in the volumes they're buying.

      Yes that is the point. I was replying to the person who commented that 4GB flash drives cost $200. The fact is that the drives in the minis right now are ALREADY at least THAT EXPENSIVE.

  62. Agreed by chevyorange · · Score: 1

    Agreed. I have abused my iPod as I am a certified klutz (traced through genealogy).. never had a hiccup.

    I thought for sure mowing the lawn with it getting vibrated pretty good would cause it to skip. Not the case.

    Given the choice though, at equal costs, I'd take a flash drive.

    --
    http://homepage.mac.com/chevyorange
  63. Re:PARENT IS WRONG- NOT INSIGHTFUL by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In case you haven't been around in the last year, the current minidisc players play mp3s. No encoding to other formats. Also, these have the ability to record in raw PCM stereo, with a mic. And upload it USB to your computer to edit.

    That's great. But the guy asked why MDs never took off like ipods. MDs just added the feature you speak of DUE TO the popularity of mp3 players.

    If you love DRM, enjoy. Not me.

    iTunes DRM has never adversely effected me.

    And yes, you can also use the new minidisc models as external USB storage drives. 1GB disc are about $6 each.

    See above. I am not giving a state of the union on md's, I am explaining why they didn't take off like ipods.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  64. Caching by el_womble · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why couldn't you have a two tier tertiary storage system. 6GB of power hungry storage, and 256MB of low power storage, the 32 MB of volatile RAM etc...

    That way your iPod wouldn't have to fire up the harddrive half as often. If you need to access your music you can, but providing you don't want to change the playlist / album or are happy with the shuffle selection you'd only need to fire up the HDD every couple of days.

    --
    Scared of flying, pointy things snce 1979!
  65. Re:too bad by isotpist · · Score: 1

    ..and Apple doesn't need to get assfucked by the RIAA over iPod sales for a bunch of geeks,...

    I don't know about that, but they certainly don't need to get screwed by the RIAA for a very small number of geeky cheapskates who will not likely buy the product anyway.

  66. ipod mini by feiming · · Score: 1

    as far as i understand,flash drive is much smaller compare to microdrive.so does it make it "mini ipod mini"??

  67. Re:PARENT IS WRONG- NOT INSIGHTFUL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's great. But the guy asked why MDs never took off like ipods. MDs just added the feature you speak of DUE TO the popularity of mp3 players.

    Yes, because when the minidisc first came out, there was no such thing as mp3. They developed their own compressed format to carry around your music.

    See above. I am not giving a state of the union on md's, I am explaining why they didn't take off like ipods.

    Why not say this in the first place before listing off a numbering of seemingly factual statements bashing the 'un-hip' minidisc?

  68. Re:PARENT IS WRONG- NOT INSIGHTFUL by slim · · Score: 1

    Defending Minidisc vs iTunes, bach37 wrote:
    If you love DRM, enjoy. Not me.

    Actually I've been stung by minidisc DRM. You're basically limited to one generation of digital copying.

    I was putting together a music quiz. First pass attempt was to record an "answers" disc, containing complete versions of the songs, then record snippets from that disc onto another disc, to form a "questions" disc.

    It couldn't be done. Minidisc DRM wouldn't permit the second copy. I had to work around it.

  69. Re:PARENT IS WRONG- NOT INSIGHTFUL by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

    Yes, because when the minidisc first came out, there was no such thing as mp3. They developed their own compressed format to carry around your music.

    That's right, and then MP3 came out, and Sony stuck to ATRAC. And then MP3 became wildly popular, and sony released "digital music players" and did they support MP3? No. More proprietary sony formats ONLY. Finally they gave up on the latest iteration, and supported MP3.

    Why not say this in the first place before listing off a numbering of seemingly factual statements bashing the 'un-hip' minidisc?

    Because I wrongly assumed you could read. The person I was responding to asked: "Ok, I have to wonder, why [MD players] never caught on.... I would love to be enlightened."

    Clear enough?

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  70. not me. by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    Like I said, I have a couple common instances where I'd like my mp3 player and my phone to be two separate devices.

    Kinda cool though I guess. Thanks for the info. BTW, your link didn't work for me. But a quick search worked since you gave the info.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  71. 40GB flash drives by 2007 by javaxman · · Score: 1

    ouch dude, if that works out to be true... well... sure, at what price point? Will flash memory storage ever become competitive with hard disk storage at some capacities ? It seriously needs an overhaul but my current main computer sports a 60GB drive, if you know what I'm getting at... I can think of a *lot* of uses for a 40GB flash drive. My digital camera needs one, for starters... camcorders... portable video players... GPS receivers... lots and lots of gadgets can use something like that...

  72. Re:too bad you're completely wrong by AaronBaker2000 · · Score: 1
    And here's a great big reason why Apple doesn't support Ogg Vorbis, it's widely used for distributing music on bittorrent based sites,that is to say that it is widely used in piracy, and Apple doesn't need to get assfucked by the RIAA over iPod sales for a bunch of geeks.

    Actually, the great big reason that Apple doesn't support Ogg Vorbis is because Ogg decoding relies heavily on floating point calculations. The iPod doesn't have a floating point unit and isn't capable of decoding Ogg. Recently, a integer-only player called Tremor was developed, but it only can play on an iPod at 80% real time.