Slashdot Mirror


Ontario to Match U.S. DST Change

Devastator writes "CBC is reporting that Ontario will be the first Canadian province to change daylight savings rules to reflect the changes happening in the U.S in 2007. Attorney General Michael Bryant says 'the province's economy was the deciding factor and that if Ontario isn't on the same time as the United States, it will be hurt financially.'"

454 comments

  1. This is really stupid by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Last time I checked, both Canada and the US did trade with countries other than each other. Some of these are in other time zones. Hell, there's a 3h discepancy between here (BC) and Ontario, and I live in the same country.

    I hope that a lot of people come out very vocally to demonstrate what a stupid idea this is, and how it's just a case of nose-to-ass following without justification.

    1. Re:This is really stupid by pappy97 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What is even dumber is whole "clocks changing" half the year standard time, half the year daylight savings time. It makes little sense today.

      Every state should pick one, and hopefully pick the SAME one.

    2. Re:This is really stupid by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I agree. As a fellow BCian we trade a heck of a lot of with China. That is what.. 16 hours ahead? (correct me if I am wrong) and we have no problems trading with them.

      I remember reading about it in the paper, and it just seemed so lame. It was as if Canada was ruled by America.

    3. Re:This is really stupid by Dav3K · · Score: 1

      You aren't kidding. If I recall, several states (like Indiana) don't use DST at all, so this would just through Ontario out of whack with them for an even longer period.

      But then again, a stupid decision made by a politician should never surprise anybody.

    4. Re:This is really stupid by Seumas · · Score: 1

      If we can change the time of day, why can't we just create 28 hour days? I've wanted 28 hour days forever.

    5. Re:This is really stupid by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 2, Informative

      From webexhibits.org:

      Daylight Saving Time, for the U.S. and its territories, is NOT observed in Hawaii, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, most of the Eastern Time Zone portion of the State of Indiana, and the state of Arizona (not the Navajo Indian Reservation, which does observe). Navajo Nation participates in the Daylight Saving Time policy, due to its large size and location in three states.

      In Canada, currently the province of Saskatchewan doesn't observe it.

      Eric
      J2ME programming info
    6. Re:This is really stupid by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      "If we can change the time of day, why can't we just create 28 hour days? I've wanted 28 hour days forever."

      We can create 28 hour days.

      Instead of having our time system come from the rotation and revolution of the Earth, we simply arbitrarily say a day = 28 hours. Same calendar, but each day is 28 hours. The day starts at 00:01 and ends at 27:59, with 28:00/00:00 the point when the new day begins. Noon would now be 14:00 (The 28 hour format makes it simpler to show this).

      It's just that in this case, a year would not be a full trip around the Sun, but who cares???

    7. Re:This is really stupid by temojen · · Score: 1

      And the portion of British Columbia between the continental divide and the Alberta border.

    8. Re:This is really stupid by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Canada, currently the province of Saskatchewan doesn't observe it.

      Haha, funny, like there's _really_ a province called "Saskatchewan." That's hilarious. The last joke province name I heard was something like "Nunavut."

      Canadians obviously have the best sense of humour. ;)

    9. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daylight Saving Time, for the U.S. and its territories, is NOT observed in Hawaii, American Samoa, Guam, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, most of the Eastern Time Zone portion of the State of Indiana, and the state of Arizona

      This is an imortant initiate - god knows what woulf happen if trade were to be disrupted between Ontario and Guam.

    10. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, a year is already not a full trip around the sun. It either misses by 1/4 day, or is 3/4 of a day past depending on the year. If we made a day 28 hours, we could make the year 313 days, and it would be pretty close (leap years would be about every 7 years)

    11. Re:This is really stupid by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      What? Like forcing people to attend French-speaking schools if their parents took a French course in High School, because that makes them count as a francophone?

      Some how, I don't see anyone resolving the whole Ontario being idiots thing.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    12. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. There also is a cost to changing a time system that seems to be being minimized by these politicians. Since you're Canadian, I wondered if you could shed some light on the topic of bird flu being allegedly found in Canadian fowl?

    13. Re:This is really stupid by Lev13than · · Score: 5, Funny

      What is even dumber is whole "clocks changing" half the year standard time, half the year daylight savings time. It makes little sense today.

      In other news, the World Will End At Midnight..... 12:30 in Newfoundland.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    14. Re:This is really stupid by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Last time I checked, both Canada and the US did trade with countries other than each other."

      But Canada and the United States are easily each other's biggest trading partners.

      "Some of these are in other time zones."

      But very few are on the same meridians and also north of the Equator.

      "3h discepancy between here (BC) and Ontario,"

      Not your province, not your problem. Gotta love federalism. You should be happy that it's Toronto talking about doing this and not Ottawa.

    15. Re:This is really stupid by Chuq · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how silly "Massachussetts" sounds if you didn't grow up in the US?

      --
      - Chuq
    16. Re:This is really stupid by slashdotnickname · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope that a lot of people come out very vocally to demonstrate what a stupid idea this is, and how it's just a case of nose-to-ass following without justification.

      There is a justification, re-read Michael Bryant's statement again about how it'll help Ontario financially. This isn't a new concept in the business world either. One variant, for example.. I work for a company located in Central time zone, but most of our customer's main offices are Eastern time zone, so we start at 8am instead of 9. To someone that doesn't usually communicate with business customers, this might not seem important, but customers do appreciate it when your time schedule is in synch with theirs.

    17. Re:This is really stupid by Klivian · · Score: 1, Funny

      As a fellow BCian we trade a heck of a lot of with China. That is what.. 16 hours ahead? (correct me if I am wrong) and we have no problems trading with them.

      Then perhaps the average Chinese trading partner are smarter than the average American counterpart?

    18. Re:This is really stupid by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Do you have any idea how silly "Massachussetts" sounds if you didn't grow up in the US?

      Or even if you did. :)

      Mississippi is even funnier, though, even when only taking into account the name itself, let alone anything else about the state.

    19. Re:This is really stupid by Seumas · · Score: 2, Funny

      It was as if Canada was ruled by America.

      What do you mean if ? :P

    20. Re:This is really stupid by Eightyford · · Score: 1

      What? Like forcing people to attend French-speaking schools if their parents took a French course in High School, because that makes them count as a francophone?

      Where did you hear this? I was never forced into a French school.

    21. Re:This is really stupid by johnlcallaway · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or .. as it was referred to in Maine when I lived there for 20 years ... massive-two-shits. Some people called it tax-it-two-us, but since I worked in both states at different times, it seemed both of them screwed me equally as well.

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    22. Re:This is really stupid by Daxster · · Score: 1

      Nunavut isn't a province, it's a territory. And town names on both sides of border have fun names :)

      --
      Death by snoo-snoo!
    23. Re:This is really stupid by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Last time I checked, both Canada and the US did trade with countries other than each other.
      So what? The U.S. is not just another trading partner for Canada. The U.S. buys 85% of Canada's exports! And exports account for one-third of the Canadian economy. Do the math: for every dollar earned by a Canadian, 28 cents comes from selling stuff to the U.S.
      Hell, there's a 3h discepancy between here (BC) and Ontario, and I live in the same country.
      Again, so what? Ontario and New York State may be in different countries — but I'll bet that New York is a lot more important to the Ontarian economy than British Columbia.

      Scenario: one fine summer morning a factory in upstate New York runs out of left handed blivets. There's a blivet warehouse across the border in Ontario, and there's another one further south. The Canadian warehouse offers a better price because of the weak Canadian dollar (I hear its not so weak these days, but this is a scenario) so the factory calls them first. No answer — it's an hour earlier in Ontario, so the warehouse office is closed. Guess who gets the order?

    24. Re:This is really stupid by 2Bits · · Score: 1

      I remember reading about it in the paper, and it just seemed so lame. It was as if Canada was ruled by America.

      Heh, I remembered when I was studying at McGill, and met a journalist (couldn't remember her name) who was having fun about the Canada's status in Washington DC. She was a young reporter sent to Washington, and has heard a lot about the USians' ignorance of geography. So, she went out to the front gate of the White House, on Pennsylvania Avenue, with 2 friends, and asked a few bypassers if they could tell them where Canada is. One of the answers she got was:

      "Hmm... I saw it somewhere, but not really sure. I think it's around the corner over there."

      And this was from a bypasser who looked like a businessman or a government office worker, very decent and "respectable" man.

    25. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indiana (or rather, the state legislature, the bastards) also caved to pressure and will observe DST beginning next Spring.

    26. Re:This is really stupid by Courier9 · · Score: 2, Informative
      In Canada, currently the province of Saskatchewan doesn't observe it.

      Actually, Saskatchewan is always on DST all year round, we never change back.

    27. Re:This is really stupid by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Or if you have a lisp Massa-chu-tits.

    28. Re:This is really stupid by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      We also have a unit of currency known as a Loonie (dollar coin), and another known as a Toonie (two dollar coin) which are booth in wide circulation. :)

    29. Re:This is really stupid by plalonde2 · · Score: 1

      You mean 8 hours behind, right? Sure there's a date line, but in practical terms 16 hours of jetlag is no worse than 8. The question is which days of the week they keep as work days and days off.

    30. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's making it up, I'd wager. My parents apparently considered putting myself and my siblings through the French school system in Ontario, but were denied doing so as while my mother was raised francophone (which is far more French than "a French course in high School"), my father wasn't.

    31. Re:This is really stupid by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      I think you're thinking about Quebec.

    32. Re:This is really stupid by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 3, Funny

      My dad's friend was deep into a poker game in Canada, about 400 miles over the border, at a hunting lodge in the middle of nowhere. The worst thing that he could have said (and in fact did say) was "how am I supposed to care about losing if this stuff looks like play money?" But I'm sure you've heard Americans say that quite often.

    33. Re:This is really stupid by Kevster · · Score: 1
      "But Canada and the United States are easily each other's biggest trading partners."

      Not any more; it's China (see bottom of page). The Globe and Mail reported "China beats out Canada as top exporter to U.S." on September 15th, quoting July trade figures.

      Bush probably still thinks Japan or Mexico are number one, though.

      --
      I always equivocate. Well, almost always.
    34. Re:This is really stupid by Stephen+Samuel · · Score: 1
      Yeah, but we're talking here of places where you are 'smuggling' when you hand a beer to your neighbour across the back fence. (I'm thinking Pt. Roberts, here). When you're used to dealing with people 15 hours apart, the difference between 15 hours and 16 hours is trivial.

      The difference, on the other hand between the same, and an hour apart is quite noticable. If you're used to "I'll meet you in Bellingham at 4:00" meaning 4:00 on my watch, then having some of the people your're used to dealing with on a synchronized clock basis suddenly be an hour off for 3 months of the year can be really annoying.

      I think there's another article out there today on how habits burn into your neural pathways.

      And, yes, I agree that this is going to be a somewhat less obvious call out here in BC where we do a lot of business with both the far east and the US.

      --
      Free Software: Like love, it grows best when given away.
    35. Re:This is really stupid by fish+waffle · · Score: 1

      In Canada, currently the province of Saskatchewan doesn't observe it.

      Saskatchewan does observe DST. However, people there do not have to reset their clocks becausethe province also changes time zones at the same time, with a net 0 effect.

      In fact, that sounds like an excellent model for Ontario to follow too. Increase the length of DST to make the americans happy, but switch time zones for the DST extension so nothing really actually differs from the current system: everybody's happy!

    36. Re:This is really stupid by Subrafta · · Score: 4, Funny

      Canada conists of several states called "provinces." These include Extremely Upstate New York, Really North Dakota, the Pacific North by Northwest, Niagra Falls, and Quebec. Saskatchewan is the Eskimo word for Really North Dakota.

      --
      Vuja De: That sinking feeling that this is going to happen again. Often occurs in meetings with Product Managers.
    37. Re:This is really stupid by momboman4 · · Score: 1

      ... and Minnesota is an Indian word for 'weather sucks the big one.'

    38. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "Hmm... I saw it somewhere, but not really sure. I think it's around the corner over there."

      I guess he couldn't possibly have thought he was being asked about the Canadian embassy. No, you're right, the 'ignorance' tag is much too handy.

    39. Re:This is really stupid by fish+waffle · · Score: 3, Funny

      so the factory calls them first. No answer -- it's an hour earlier in Ontario, so the warehouse office is closed. Guess who gets the order?

      Oh my god, you're right---and that scenario must happen at least, what 1--2 times a year?! 10's, if not 20's of dollars could be lost!! Surely an excellent reason for millions of people to change their lifestyles!

      Canadians take note: you risk the complete loss of the incredibly lucrative industry that relies on emergency, last-minute blivet purchasing by morons who don't understand time zones and can't wait a hour!

    40. Re:This is really stupid by Barkley44 · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't you know - according to the radio everyone is hailing this as the greatest things, teachers are happy because it gives more daylight hours for kids to play, safer streets, etc What a load of crap.

      --
      KeepTrackOfIt.com - Find the lowest gas prices in your area graphically
    41. Re:This is really stupid by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "The Globe and Mail reported "China beats out Canada as top exporter to U.S." on September 15th, quoting July trade figures."

      First off, I'm too cheap to give them money to read the article, but from what I've seen in the first link and what they're showing before sale, I find it interesting that they're specifying "exporter of goods," as if there's other information that might keep Canada's rank in terms of raw dollars.

      At any rate, however, I doubt what Canada sends to the US is anything to sneeze at, and I suspect the US is still Canada's (and especially Ontario's) top export destination.

      "Bush probably still thinks Japan or Mexico are number one, though."

      They never were. Mexico eventually overtook Japan's place as #2 exporter to the US after NAFTA, but neither ever really challenged Canada's dominance.

    42. Re:This is really stupid by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 1

      Even more stupid is when people really think it's a big deal. Who cares if they change the official time or not? People just use this and other trivial things as a reason to get off WoW and bash USA, Canada, [insert target country here]

      --
      I am Spartacus
    43. Re:This is really stupid by ToasterofDOOM · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even growing up in the states it sounds funny. Some more funny names are Indian derived names like 'Chattahoochee' or 'Apalachicola'. And I grew up in Georgia where these are commonplace!

      --
      I am Spartacus
    44. Re:This is really stupid by subVorkian · · Score: 1

      You were modded as insightful? Man the moderators are sniffing glue tonight. So let's synch up clocks across Canada. To let you guys have the sunset at, say 8:00pm, we will let the sunset at 5:00 year-round? Give your fucking head a shake.

    45. Re:This is really stupid by robertjw · · Score: 1

      I, for one, welcome our new American overlords...

    46. Re:This is really stupid by ChairmanMeow · · Score: 1

      Or we could just redefine the length of an hour such that there are 28 hours for each rotation of the Earth.

      --
    47. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, cool, now you can just make stuff up and post it on /.!

    48. Re:This is really stupid by baomike · · Score: 1

      Wrote my congress criter complaining about the extension, the reply was bland.
      It was contained in a bigger bill and no one thought it important enough to question it.

    49. Re:This is really stupid by letxa2000 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I know you were just trolling (and not doing a very good job at it, really), but I have to ask...

      Fuck the US and fuck the bullshit beurocracy. The US gov't pisses me off so much with idiotic rules which serve the wealthiest minorities, i want to puke.

      Could you please let me know which wealthy minority is being served by this change to DST and, better yet, tell me which poor minority (or majority) is being hurt, and how?

      For the record, I wish DST were in effect all year long. I'd especially like it in the winter when the days are too short as it is. Give me an extra hour at the end of the workday, I could care less whether or not I drive to work in the dark.

    50. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Two tourists from the south (country unknown) got lost in the Canadian prairies. They saw a town, but didn't know what it was. They decided to ask a Canadian who was nearby plowing his field. "Can you tell me what town that is?". The reply came, "Saskatoon Saskachewan". "Drat, they don't speak English," one tourist said to the other.

      (OK, it works better verbally.)

    51. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably assumed they were being asked about the Canadian Embassy.

      After all, it would be pretty goddamn silly for somebody to be on the streets of Washington DC asking people where Canada is.

    52. Re:This is really stupid by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 1, Troll

      I know this was modded funny, but it's not entirely a joke. There's a growing sentiment that Canada is being pushed around by the States. The US refusal to hand over $5 billion in duties that, as declared by the top NAFTA panel, it illegally took. Getting Canada to extradite citizens to the US when they have broken no Canadian laws, Deity Of Your Choice knows what else. This is just the latest in a long line of American bullshit being forced upon Canada.

      What I find truly funny is how quick the US is to throw blame on Canada for *everything*. Canada encourages terrorits. Canada caused the The Great Blackout (which was a bald-faced lie, and I don't recall any appologies given later, either)

      It really bothers me that the US just *expects* everyone will roll over and do whatever the US says, to happily take abuse and mud slung from the US. And then when the US doesn't get it's way, like a 2 year old it throws temper tantrum and decimates other countries.

      And the American people wonder why no one else in the world likes them...

    53. Re:This is really stupid by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      Canada invented the idea of time zones. Stupid idea Ontario, get some balls.

        From one side of Canada to the other there is a 4.5 hour difference. (most central Canadians don't even know there are two time zones past them to the East)

    54. Re:This is really stupid by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      Another poster mentioned that this is Quebec... My bad, I blame the US educational system for not teaching me anything about the different Canadian provinces.

      There actually was a guy in Quebec who's son got screwed and forced to go to a French school, because his Dad studied French before. They classified him a francophone, and in Quebec the laws enforce French propogation. I'm certain one could find something with Google about it.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    55. Re:This is really stupid by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      D'oh!

      Yeah, you're right... *sigh* Leave it to my itch to make fun of the French, and even the French-speakers that even the French make fun of. I go and jump the gun, and miss my target. *sigh* well, thanks for setting me straight, at least I can have the dignity of posting a correction.

      Correction: Ontario doesn't suck, as the parent has just reminded me, the actual name of the province that sucks is Quebec.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    56. Re:This is really stupid by Krach42 · · Score: 1

      Well, I didn't make this story up. It actually did happen... just in Quebec, not Ontario. I admit being a dumbass for mixing up the two, but this story did actually happen to some poor guy who moved to Quebec.

      --

      I am unamerican, and proud of it!
    57. Re:This is really stupid by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Could someone explain how "Arkansas" is apparently pronounced "Arkinsaw"? I assumed they were two different states till recently.

    58. Re:This is really stupid by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > we have no problems trading with them.

      I dunno, I used to work for a company that was HQ'd in Arizona, with their flat-earth policy towards DST, we would routinely miss phone conferences. (The crappy scheduling system that only showed original timezones didn't help.) Cow-orks tell horror stories about working at companies located around Indiana. At least we will all be able to easily figure out what time it is in Ontario.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
    59. Re:This is really stupid by turnipsatemybaby · · Score: 1

      Whew boy, I needed that. Wow! Look at the time... Didn't realize it was that time of the month already... ;)

    60. Re:This is really stupid by NitsujTPU · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reason that I don't like you is because you is because you don't like me.

      By the way, plenty of non-Americans like me, so I don't know what you're on about. Perhaps if you turned off your television and did something with your life, you'd realize that politicians are politicians and that politicians in other countries do stupid things too. I didn't propose the change in DST, but you've decided that you dislike me because of my country of origin, and decided to hop on your soapbox and insult me over this issue.

      Last year, I spent a lot of time thinking about this. Why do high UID losers on Slashdot hate me because of my American origin?

      How about this one for stupid... Why do Slashdotters post about boycotting all things American... then view Slashdot (an American revenue stream), and buy junk from ThinkGeek (another American revenue stream). How about, you don't believe a word of what you say, or at least have no convictions so strong that you're actually willing to stand up for them insofar as that they might actually inconvenience you.

      You're a biggot. If I went around spouting off about how I hate the French and Germans, that's what I'd be called. It's no different just because you're Canadian, and I'm an American.

    61. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps, but the women are fantastic!

    62. Re:This is really stupid by rec9140 · · Score: 1

      What is even dumber is whole "clocks changing" half the year standard time, half the year daylight savings time. It makes little sense today.

      EXACTLY! There is NO NEED for this nonsense in the 21st century.

      There are no energy savings from this real or otherwise. Unless were going to go back to the way it used to be. No Sunday shopping, stores close at 1900 or 2000 Mon thru Sat.. Offices operate 0900-1500.

      That scenario just won't work in the 21st century. Its a 24/7/365 world.

      I can also hear the "What about the children!" hue & cry. Quite blunty I DON'T GIVE A DAMN about the children! (I am on /., so no I don't have kids, thankfully.) It was dark when I got on the school bus for all levels of school in all different places and I managed to survive. Those hordes of SUV/MiniVans/cars at bus stops need to go too!

      This whole practice of DST just needs to be outlawed completely and the time zones need some readjusting on their boundaries as well.

      --
      1311393600 - Back to Black
    63. Re:This is really stupid by Poeir · · Score: 1
      10's, if not 20's of dollars could be lost!!

      Canadian dollars.
      --
      Sigs are like bumper stickers.
    64. Re:This is really stupid by phorm · · Score: 1

      Did I say that? No, I said that given the provinces already have different time zones and yet still manage interprovincial commerce, stating financial reasons is pretty lame in towing to the US DST change. Really, letting the US have a different timezone isn't going make trade any worse than it is across the timezones of various provinces.

    65. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nunavut is actually a 'territory' but I suppose its asking a bit much for you to understand the distinction between provinces and territories.

    66. Re:This is really stupid by udowish · · Score: 1

      I am from Saskatoon, great city.

      --
      when in doubt press enter and we'll figure it out later..
    67. Re:This is really stupid by ve3oat · · Score: 1

      Exactly. A really stupid idea to follow the U.S. like some obedient sheep. I live in Ontario and I am ashamed of my provincial government. Besides, surely changes to something as fundamental to commerce and everyday life as Time Zones must be negotiated under the rules of NAFTA. Isn't that what NAFTA is all about?? So where is the consultation, the negotiation, the joint decision? Ah, well, we know what the U.S. government thinks about NAFTA and any rules imposed on the U.S. -- NAFTA rules are OK when imposed on Canada and Mexico but the U.S. is exempt from all of that!

    68. Re:This is really stupid by klparrot · · Score: 1
      Scenario: one fine summer morning a factory in upstate New York runs out of left handed blivets. There's a blivet warehouse across the border in Ontario, and there's another one further south. The Canadian warehouse offers a better price because of the weak Canadian dollar (I hear its not so weak these days, but this is a scenario) so the factory calls them first. No answer -- it's an hour earlier in Ontario, so the warehouse office is closed. Guess who gets the order?

      Scenario: one fine summer evening a factory in upstate New York runs out of left handed blivets. There's a blivet warehouse across the border in Ontario, and there's another one further south. The factory calls the American warehouse first (maybe arbitarily; I can't be bothered to think of a reason). No answer; the warehouse office is closed for the day. But it's an hour earlier in Ontario, so the Canadian warehouse office is still open. Guess who gets the order?

    69. Re:This is really stupid by Fyre2012 · · Score: 0

      lol

      Yah, i'll admit, WhatReallyHappened.com has probably gotten to my brain a little too much lately.
      *removes tinfoil hat*
      I wasn't trolling so much as just venting. After some further review done by surpressing that good 'ol leftie-knee-jerk reaction 'OMGCONSPIRACY!' cry, i'll agree that the notion of giving us some more daytime isn't such a bad one after all. Considering that the current system has been around for quite some time, and was built during a time which had different needs in relation to the governance of the measurement of time. (i.e. shipping via rail)

      Sorry for the 'fsk teh yankies' diatrabe, it wasn't called for. After my younger brother took his life shortly after Sept 11 because he felt that WW3 was inevitable that the world was going to end and no ammount of tin-foil could stop this, i get upset when i see the Canadian government bending over to the US's policies.

      Living near Niagara Falls, i'm already seeing a giant chunk of my country's hydro electric energy exported to the US which could be better used in our own back yards instead of building more 'less eco-friendly' power generators. There's talk about building a giant LNG storage favility in my town, $1.6B later, right near a major canal.

      my point? The US Government and it's policies scare me. I have no idea what's really going on, the politicians are liars who only care about their wallets and the wallets of their constituents. How can we trust anything they do or propose? *tinfoil hat back on*
      they sent your kids off to die in a war built on lies, and the world knows it, how can anyone trust them or any policy they wish to introduce?

      So anyways, sorry for the banter. The DST is a good idea. I'll stop looing for 'DST-Gate' and go back under my bridge

      --
      This is not the greatest .sig in the world, no. This is just a tribute.
    70. Re:This is really stupid by Astin · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's not where the bulk of Ontario's business is. Yes, there is billions in trade DAILY over the border, but possibly the most infulential business voices are those of the banks and trading firms. US Market opens at 9:30am ET. Toronto Stock Exchange also opens at 9:30am ET. Both close at 4pm ET. If the the exchanges are out of sync, then there will be huge arbitrage situation with interlisted securities. The fact of the matter is that the TSX is heavily dependent on US activity. On non-shared US holidays, Canadian trading volume drops tremendously. That one hour difference for a few weeks a year is a tremendous pain.

      --
      - In hell, treason is the work of angels.
    71. Re:This is really stupid by paving-slab · · Score: 2, Funny

      24/7/365? Is that 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 weeks a year... Talk about messing with time.

    72. Re:This is really stupid by yo303 · · Score: 1

      They have territories too: Puerto Rico, Guam, US Virgin Islands, and many more in the Pacific. Until recently, Hawaii and the Panama Canal zone were territories too; one became a state and one got given back. yo.

    73. Re:This is really stupid by AoT · · Score: 1

      except in our case 'territories' would be better refered to as 'colonies'.

      But, I swear we are not an empire.

    74. Re:This is really stupid by kletus · · Score: 1

      Basically a French translation of the name of a tribe here they traded with, the Oogapaw. Lots of French-Indian community names here.

    75. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Either way, territories and colonies are outdated in this day and age. In the US and Canada. Really, Puerto Rico should become a state and the Pacific territories should become part of Hawaii.

      But how do you arrange 51 stars symmetrically on a flag?

    76. Re:This is really stupid by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Not your province, not your problem. Gotta love federalism. You should be happy that it's Toronto talking about doing this and not Ottawa.

      The problem, though, is that Toronto thinks that Ontario is all of Canada, and Ottawa seems to agree. Well, Ottawa thinks that Ontario + Quebec are Canada, but you get the idea.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    77. Re:This is really stupid by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think I've ever heard it said with quite that degree of arrogance... but rest assured that we think that your money closely resembles monopoly money as well. ;)

      Still, it's kind of amusing that the US thinks that color coded money is so fake looking... when the US seems to be the last country on the planet to have money that comes in only one colour.

    78. Re:This is really stupid by Nanuq · · Score: 1

      Seen this? http://www.dbeat.com/28/

      It's still be a (near) revolution around the sun, except it'd be 312 "days" to the year, though still 52 weeks.

      24 hours * 7 days * 52 weeks = 8736 hours
      28 hours * 6 days * 52 weeks = 8736 hours

      All times approximate.

    79. Re:This is really stupid by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You've just pointed out the solution to the problem. If your business requires you to work 8am to 4pm because that's what suits your customers best, then work from 8am to 4pm. Don't set your clocks an hour forward and pretend you're working 9 to 5.

    80. Re:This is really stupid by csrster · · Score: 1

      It's not "Massachussetts" that sounds silly, it's the people who live there.

    81. Re:This is really stupid by BridgeGarth · · Score: 1

      The same size and the same colour.

    82. Re:This is really stupid by Dan+Hayes · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it. I work on doing stock charts for users around the world, which means that taking into consideration both the user's local DST and the market's DST rules - it's a bloody nightmare, and this change is going to mean more annoyances as Java doesn't have any mechanism to handle this sort of thing. I seriously wish they'd get rid of DST altogether.

    83. Re:This is really stupid by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      you risk the complete loss of the incredibly lucrative industry that relies on emergency, last-minute blivet purchasing by morons who don't understand time zones and can't wait a hour!

      Yea, we're risking trade with the U.S.
      Didn't you RTFA?

    84. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.moneyfactory.com/newmoney/main.cfm/curr ency/aboutNotes

      They hardly look all the same color to me.

    85. Re:This is really stupid by NitsujTPU · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also, to add insult to injury... I got modded troll for this. This guy hopped up on his soapbox to America-bash. All that I did is say that I disliked the sentiment that people dislike me because I'm American. Just because you dislike Americans too doesn't make you any less of a biggot.

    86. Re:This is really stupid by D-Cypell · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The US is generally disliked because of the nationalism that seems to be so pervasive over there. I cannot count the times I have seen a US citizen on TV droning on about how the US is "The greatest country on earth", it is this kind of thing that tends to piss people off. Many other countries have democracy, many the same kinds of freedom in the US, some even go beyond the US with a decent set of free public services (like healthcare).

      People react against this attitude and the whole situation escalates. It's like the kid at school is goes around telling everyone how he is the best at sports, has the richest family etc, even if he is correct, everyone still hates the little prick.

      I have a lot of friends stateside, I have absolutely no problem with Joe Public American. I dont hate *you*. I do 'dislike' the image your country has, in many ways states become 'people' (like corporations) with their own personality, views and belief structures. When people say they 'hate' America they are not talking about you, they are talking about this virtual person. If they say they hate Americans that is a different story....

      Many Americans demonstrate their tendancy towards nationalism when they get all pissed of if somebody critizes their country. I am from the UK, critize my country all you want, I would not interpret this as a personal attack, merely something to be considered if warrented and discarded otherwise.

      (At the risk of having Godwin's law invoked)
      People in Europe grew up being taught of the damage that such passionate nationalism can do. The US is a long way from that point, but is going in that direction.

    87. Re:This is really stupid by theolein · · Score: 1

      Becuase the original pronunciation (Arkans' ass) offended the founding fathers.

    88. Re:This is really stupid by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      except in our case 'territories' would be better refered to as 'colonies'.

      Except colonies are supposed to be profitable and important. Ours would be better refered to as 'companies that contract with Accenture'.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    89. Re:This is really stupid by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not just that someone critisizes our country. It's HOW they critisize our country. They often act as if the US is the source of all evil and their own countries are pristine and saintly. And then they wonder why we get pissed off at them.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    90. Re:This is really stupid by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Especially since Kansas is NOT pronounced "Kansaw".

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    91. Re:This is really stupid by neoform · · Score: 1

      Nunavut is a canadian territory, not a province.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    92. Re:This is really stupid by camt · · Score: 1

      For the record, I wish DST were in effect all year long. I'd especially like it in the winter when the days are too short as it is. Give me an extra hour at the end of the workday, I could care less whether or not I drive to work in the dark.

      I concur. Then you can do away with the DST moniker completely and simply have:

      EST = UTC-04:00
      CST = UTC-05:00
      MST = UTC-06:00
      PST = UTC-07:00

    93. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see, you're smart enough to handle EDT and PDT when daylight savings is in effect and EST and PST when it isn't in effect. Yet MST when daylight savings is in effect is a conundrum. Sure.

    94. Re:This is really stupid by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

      No doubt, I live in Ontario and deal with the USA all the time (im a network admin). Guess where MOST of my support comes from for MOST of my equipment? California. Thats 3hrs behind me. I have gotten used to the fact that I have to wait until 11:00am before any of those guys are awake at their desks. Is it an inconvenience? Mildly, and only on occasion. If I had a major problem, I could call the "emergency" line and it would be the same as if it was at 2:30am. Would I change my whole lifestyle around to "pretend" im Pacific Time? No!

      The whole idea of clock schedules is just fucked up. If there was an international database that had every timezone mapped to every location, and all major businesses had it, there wouldn't be this problem. Say your estimated shipping time is 48hours, put in your location, but in the remote location and then call the remote location and tell them the ETA. The DB can do the calculation on the difference.

      Or hey, do all your business dealings in GMT. Just say its leaving at 9AM GMT (even if that means 2:00pm your time or whatever), and say the customer should have it at 5PM GMT the next day (im my case, that would be 1:00pm).

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    95. Re:This is really stupid by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 1

      From one side of Canada to the other there is a 4.5 hour difference. (most central Canadians don't even know there are two time zones past them to the East)

      How do you know?

      --
      You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
    96. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Kansas. The Arkansas river begins in Colorado, goes through Kansas and onward to Oklahoma, Arkansas, etc. When the river is in Kansas, it is called Ar-Kansas River. A city on the river is called Ar-Kansas (spelled Arkansas) or Ark City.

    97. Re:This is really stupid by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      I hear that a lot from down here, but it seems that Ontario and Quebec are still so opposed to one another that Ottawa's need for a "hands-off" approach to dealing with one or the other gives the other seven trickle-down benefits of federalism.

      In many ways I envy you guys, and it's not about healthcare or your stance on Iraq.

    98. Re:This is really stupid by fm6 · · Score: 1
      I wasn't trying to describe a typical transaction (the blivet market is remarkably small). I was simply illustrating the disadvantages a business has when it's open at the same time as its market. Yes, any given business is only going to see a small effect — but multiply that by thousands of businesses, and you have a significant impact on the economy.

      In some parts of the U.S., where it's densely populated and impossible to draw time zone boundaries that don't intersect heavily populated areas, epic battles have been fought over what zone you get to be in. It's not a small matter.

    99. Re:This is really stupid by Rhipf · · Score: 1

      That's not as bad as Mackinac (Mackinaw). Who comes up with these names any way? ;-)

    100. Re:This is really stupid by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      For the record, I wish DST were in effect all year long. I'd especially like it in the winter when the days are too short as it is. Give me an extra hour at the end of the workday, I could care less whether or not I drive to work in the dark.

      I hate those "it's for the children!" arguments as much as everyone else, but it this case it's pretty much true. My city is pretty close to the western edge of its timezone, and pretty far north (same latitude as Boston (south of Minnesota, north of the majority of the country)). The chilluns have some long, dark mornings as they make their way to school.

      I wouldn't make a decision solely on that, but it's something to consider.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    101. Re:This is really stupid by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      The problem, though, is that Toronto thinks that Ontario is all of Canada, and Ottawa seems to agree.

      Get that tinfoil hat back on.

      Ontario is to the rest of the country like the US is to Canada - Other provinces moan and complain that Ontario isn't paying enough attention to them, or that Ontario makes some self-serving change without consideration for the other provinces. Amazingly you can substitute "America" for "Ontario", and "Canada" for "other provinces" in that statement and it is just as true.

      The thing is this - here in Ontario, and especially in Toronto, there's a lot of people and a lot of issues. We tend to focus on our own issues. For whatever reason, the rest of Canada also focuses on Ontario and Toronto's issues - And then they blame is on us! It's like the Canadians that bitch about how Americans don't know Canadian politicians, but we know all of theirs. Sounds more like a focus problem on our side, but strangely that's not how other people see.

      I marvel at a prior message in this discussion where someone moaned about the US pushing other countries around, and how we were being bullied into this change. What utter selfish bollocks: The US has the right to do whatever the hell they want with their time. If they want to go to a metric clock then they can. Our choice to follow is because that's the course of action that serves us best. It isn't being bullied any more than the US is being bullied by the sun.

      Of course many (not all) in the rest of the country are just astoundingly ignorant in their paranoia. Countless letters to the editor about how Ontarians hate those hill-billy Albertans, for instance, penned by an Albertan. Funny, I've never heard anyone actually here express that. Endless nonsense about how we don't care about trade unless it affects Ontario - Then why the hell is everyone here bitching and complaining about softwood lumber and mad cow, and why is it the main topic of news for months?

    102. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We Americans just say that we have no idea where Canada is. You see, it's always a Canadian who asks us and we are offended by the very question. We think it's funny to pretend we never heard of Canada because the only thing a Canadian can't stand is being forgotton, or assumed a part of the U.S. It's always fun to let the Canadians think we believe we own the whole continent, they always get so damn mad :P

    103. Re:This is really stupid by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Woah, a Canadian flame war! Pass the popcorn!

      Seriously, I think this stuff has the potential to be the next Big Thing on reality television or something similar, right on up there with Spanish language soap operas. We could call it "How the Other Tenth Lives."

      As you yourself said, nobody down here has any idea what you folks talk about during your spare time up there. We could be all like "Quebec is having another secession referenda next month, that hussy!"

      (I am so going to Hell)

    104. Re:This is really stupid by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Hmm... I saw it somewhere, but not really sure. I think it's around the corner over there."

      Considering there's a Quebec Street in DC, did the reporter consider the possibility that they were talking to someone who wasn't a life-long resident who thought they were talking about a "Canada Street?"

    105. Re:This is really stupid by n6mod · · Score: 1

      The last time I was in Canada, I'd been to the UK and Singapore within the past couple of months, and so I had ~$30 of leftover currency from each in my wallet. All of the non-US currency looked very similar, enough so that I inadvertantly tried to buy lunch with a ten-pound note.

      There was no mistaking the Greenbacks. It's all a matter of perspective. :)

      (That said, the new Fruit-Stripe US$20's and US$50's *do* look like monopoly money.)

      --
      You have violated Robot's Rules of Order and will be asked to leave the future immediately.
    106. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So basically, you think the last remaining superpower on earth should be a self-loathing one?

      Get over it. America is the center of the world, because the rest of the world MAKES IT THE CENTER. We don't flock to your country to become business tycoons, sports stars, entertainment moguls or just about anything else.

      I don't care for the senseless "god bless the USA" crap that for some reason causes SUV driving morons to place yellow ribbons in support of the war on their cars a few inches from the jesus fish and I'm tired of people who act like America is the only democracy on the face of the fucking planet or that everyone outside of the country lives in a hut and suffers under some evil dictator. However, I'm also tired of the rest of the world who clearly envies the country and emulates it like a kid-brother with his bigger-brother turning around and acting like we shouldn't dare to think anything of ourselves, despite the rest of the world making us the center of theirs.

      Want to make us stop thinking that way, as a society? Stop buying our soft drinks. Stop watching our movies. Stop listening to our music. Stop letting all of your entertainers come her eto make it big. Stop sending your sports pros here to make it big. Stop desperately trying to get a grip on the latest fashions in this country so you can mimic them in yours. Stop caring so much about American policy. We don't just THINk we're the center of the world. We ARE the center of the world. The fact that the entire world (including you right now) are spending their time talking about America while we're not spending our time talking about, say, Ireland or Zambia, just proves it.

      I don't own a gun, yellow ribbon or an SUV - and I'm about the least "patriotic" person I know. Still, just because you're not happy with or proud of your country doesn't mean other people shouldn't be of theirs. See, pride tends to come with success. When your country is only a couple hundred years old and you've saved most of "the old country" from themselves and rebuilt them and come to their aid whenever you can and won a couple of world wars and built the greatest financial super-power on the planet and still managed to have an essential democracy (though it has many failings) - I think you have a right to brag.

      Many Americans see europeans as people who don't care about much and are apathetic because they don't involve themselves in their government and their government is hundreds of years old or more and they feel completely disconnected and would rather sit around all afternoon on the sidwalk at a cafe, drinking and wearing khaki pants without underwear or socks. So... it goes both ways.

    107. Re:This is really stupid by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

      I've talked to suppliers on the phone and tourists from Ontario and it never amazes me that 90% of them alaways exclaim "Oh it's an hour earlier here than back home, I never knew that!"

    108. Re:This is really stupid by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      We're starting to come around now and have some colored bills...$20, $50 and $10 is coming out soon.

    109. Re:This is really stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your ignorance is astounding.

      before i actauly make a point id like to illustrate this.

      who made your TV? your DVD player? GE deosnt make TV's anymore Japanese companies squeezed them out of the market. What do the parts in your electronics say? "made in tiawan". Whats the biggest entertainment craze? anime. Do you see deluded fanboys spouting poor american slang or trying to sound like japanese? Hell even PORN sites brag about 'hot asian models' whens the last time you saw anyone bragging about 'hot american trailer trash'?

      The world much watch the US because its leaders are luinatics and idiots. We must watch, wonder and focus on your country because the rest of the damn planet has to sit here wondering who your going to invade next.

      The US has become the focus of the world because its barely literate leaders control enough firepower to glass the planet, and have direct control over the internet.

      and if anyone so much as looks at them funny they will be threatened with a large military and econimic sanctions, and of course for those reasons they can force other nations to fall in line for those sanctions.

      Your nation is going the way of the Romans, its corrupt and drunk on its own power. The US is rotting from the inside out, and it WILL fall, and not because of terrorism or a war ironicaly enough.

      Were just worried who else your going to take down with you.

  2. Bush and Time by LikwidFlux · · Score: 1, Funny

    U.S. President George W. Bush signed on to the change in August as part of a massive energy bill.

    Coming from a man who can only read digital clocks.

    --
    Just your everyday corporate code monkey.
    1. Re:Bush and Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lib troll sniper fire! take cover!!!

      SUVs... Global Warming... Haliburton.. Quail season!!!! OH MY FUCKING GOD!!!

    2. Re:Bush and Time by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0

      Coming from a man who can only read digital clocks.

      Who said he could read?!

    3. Re:Bush and Time by ddx+Christ · · Score: 1

      I hate to break it to you, but that's not saying much. A lot of students can't seem to read any clock aside from digital. It's quite pathetic. Someone asked me for the time and I told him there was a clock on the wall, and he must have stared at it for two minutes before I added that there's also a digital clock in the room.

    4. Re:Bush and Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps it was one of these damn things. bloody useless

    5. Re:Bush and Time by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I don't like those either, but I can tell you the time is roughly 10:10 on the clock in the image.

    6. Re:Bush and Time by sabernet · · Score: 1

      sorry...I don't know anyone who can't read an analogue clock around here.

      Educate the buggers better.

      Is this another one of them World/US cultural differences?

    7. Re:Bush and Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeap, in US they know what 'nucular' means.

  3. Peak Oil crisis spreading to Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now Canada is yielding to the DST rules. What next ... speed limits and gas rations?! The handwriting is on the wall ... Peak Oil is real and the government is panicking!

  4. oblig rant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can't stand daylight savings time, it kills my day. If the sun is only up for a few hours it should be up later in the day, not like 7 in the morning till 5:30 or something... 8 to 6:30 would be much better. It pissed me off when they started it "so children could get on the bus in the morning in the daylight" and it continues to piss me off now that it is expanding...

    1. Re:oblig rant... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1

      I usually rant about it in the spring. In the fall, I really look forward to that extra long Sunday.

    2. Re:oblig rant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it continues to piss me off now that it is expanding...

      Um, actually the change means it will be lighter out later in the day for two months longer out of the year. If you hate when it's lighter in the morning rather than the evening then this should be a step in the right direction for you...

    3. Re:oblig rant... by monkaduck · · Score: 1

      Move to Arizona or most of Indiana. We don't change our clocks.

      --
      Napalm is nature's toothpaste
    4. Re:oblig rant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you ever move to a different country because of it?

    5. Re:oblig rant... by Tsiangkun · · Score: 1

      I predict an increase in violence.

      Knowing the only daylight available is when most people are going to be working, or sleeping, can't be a recipe for peace.

      I hate DST.

    6. Re:oblig rant... by temojen · · Score: 1

      Then you really only have 2 options:

      1) Set your clock to GMT. Wouldn't it be nice to be able to sleep in till 1 in the afternoon every day, and still be on time for work?

      2) Set your clock based on a measured local noon (time of highest sun) and adjust it daily to keep in sync.

    7. Re:oblig rant... by grimr · · Score: 4, Informative

      You have it backwards. Daylight savings time is what gives more sunlight later in the day. The children getting on the bus argument is against making DST a larger percentage of the year or shifting the time more than just one hour.

    8. Re:oblig rant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must mean that your economy is in shambles! Your time is different than your neighbors'!!!!!

    9. Re:oblig rant... by Nerull · · Score: 1

      Thanks to the state government, Indiana will now.

    10. Re:oblig rant... by lancejjj · · Score: 1

      I can't stand daylight savings time, it kills my day. If the sun is only up for a few hours it should be up later in the day, not like 7 in the morning till 5:30 or something

      FYI, DST pushes the clock ahead so the sun is up later in the day (relative to local clock time).

      I think you mean to express that you can't stand "standard time", which is defined so that thethe sun rises earlier and sets earlier (again, relative to local clock time)

    11. Re:oblig rant... by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1

      same in queensland (australia), and they seriously did say it would confuse the cows and fade the curtains.

      petition to get it changed at
      http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/EPetitions_QLD/cg i-bin/Petitions.cgi?PetNum=553

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
    12. Re:oblig rant... by MHobbit · · Score: 1

      Actually, daylight savings team would indeed change the 7AM-5:30PM of sunlight to 8-6:30... it moves the hours ahead. So, in your example, DST would be ideal.

      --
      Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Bugs are good for building character in the user.
    13. Re:oblig rant... by b3nbr0wn · · Score: 1

      yes, I thought I'd gone mental for a second...

    14. Re:oblig rant... by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

      It's just wonderful for someone going to school at 6:30 in the morning at 40N Latitude!
      (Hint: 21/10/05 at 40N with DST: Twilight at 6:49, Sunrise at 7:17)

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    15. Re:oblig rant... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually childen will be in school bus in much brighter sun light
      when they get to school in the standard time (i.e. an hour later)

    16. Re:oblig rant... by AaronGTurner · · Score: 1

      The logic is that children going to school in the dark are more vulnerable to accidents as drivers in the dark don't see the kids until after they are under their wheels. The actual increased risk might not be that high and might be offset by mandating school uniforms in dayglo colours for all schoolchildren.

  5. Imagine a government so powerful.. by QuantumG · · Score: 5, Funny

    they can change time itself.

    Woe.

    --
    How we know is more important than what we know.
    1. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by ajwitte · · Score: 1

      Whoa?

      --
      chown -R us ~you/base
    2. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by saskboy · · Score: 1

      In Canada it's up to each province how they deal with time law. In Saskatchewan we don't change our clocks for DST, we are on it year round. This means that in the Summer we are on MST essentially, and in the Winter on CST. We're used to our American stations having their timeslots "shifted" an hour every 6 months, and I for one like it. I lived in Ontario for a bit, and the time shift sucked. Who wants to go to work an hour earlier in the spring?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Saskatchewan we...

      Stop it with that 'Saskatchewan' joke - you're killin' me here! :)

      It's like some kind of Wookie name or something.

    4. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by ScoLgo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No. I think he got it right. Not whoa, but woe. As in, "Woe to you, oh Earth and Sea. For the Devil sends the Beast with wrath. Because he knows the time is short - so he changed DST to compensate."

      (Score:-1, Poor Iron Maiden Reference)

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    5. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      Normally, I would ignore posts like this, but since you posted basically the same thing a few comments up, I have to let you know that you are a fucking moron. Saskatchewan is really the name of a province. Study some geography and learn these things! Stop making all Americans look like they're completely ignorant of anything but America!

      God I hope your not serious about this...

      --
      My other car is first.
    6. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, way to not recognize a joke. You get a gold star for the day.

    7. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Heh, thanks. I was going to reply to this guy (and the other guy who thought I misspelt 'wow') but I couldn't think of anything to say that wasn't an insult on the limited vocabulary of Slashdoters. You have reinstated my faith!

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    8. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by jrockway · · Score: 1

      The fact that you posted it more than once makes one wonder. One time it's funny, twice it's stupid, etc.

      Also, jokes are supposed to be funny, and yours wasn't.

      --
      My other car is first.
    9. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by Chrispy1000000+the+2 · · Score: 1

      Once is a joke. Twice is being a retard. Anymore, and your just asking for it.

      --
      Sig
    10. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by Analog+Squirrel · · Score: 1

      Arizona (most of it) stays on MST year round. I've decided that's one of the best parts of my decision to live here...

      --
      I'd rather be flying
    11. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

      once I got up too fast and bent my Saskatchewan

      DJCC

    12. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Saskatchewan, daylight time saves Wookies!

      Or something like that. Was that the Saskatchewan joke you were referring to?

    13. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      The fact that you posted it more than once makes one wonder. One time it's funny, twice it's stupid, etc.

      He referred in the joke to the fact that he'd made it more than once. And what's the "etc."? I haven't heard that phrase, but I have heard, "fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me." And you were apparently fooled on the second point.

      Also, jokes are supposed to be funny, and yours wasn't.

      Well, they both got +5 Funny, and humor is often subjective. Since enough moderators modded both of them up, we presume that many people thought it was funny (since the mods are a random sample). I for one thought it was great.

      If you're disputing humor it's often useful to wait an hour and see how it gets modded. (I made this mistake once, and I made an angry and embarrasing response to someone who made what I later realized was a joke against me, not a criticism.)

      Then again, you could say that since it got +5 Funny, not anything else, the mods didn't consider it that great because they didn't give him the karma.

    14. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 0

      Mebbe. Is Saskatchewan where Sasquatches come from? What _is_ the plural of Sasquatch, anyway, assuming that's even spelled correctly. If Canadian, it probably needs a superfluous 'u' in there somewhere.

    15. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the second time I had the Wookie bit to add. You'll probably live longer if you just chill the hell out. If you're up in Canada, that's probably not too hard, cuz you all live in igloos, right?

    16. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of a Simpsons quote by Ralph Wiggam, "I bent my Saskatchewan."

    17. Re:Imagine a government so powerful.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If the moderators thought it was funny, then it must be so.

      hahahahaha

  6. Man that's weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is

  7. Sleeping with an Elephant by dso · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This seems to be a typical Canada/US relation. It's like the old saying goes:

    "When you sleep with an elephant, if it rolls, you roll."

    1. Re:Sleeping with an Elephant by Red+Alastor · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not Canada it's Ontario. Timezones are of provincial authority. So if any province wants to switch timezone or DST, Canada can't say anything against it. Quebec already announced it would switch so either it is first to or Slashdot is slow to report the news :)

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    2. Re:Sleeping with an Elephant by Sandman1971 · · Score: 1

      Actually, according to the Globe and Mail , their article stated that Quebec will PROBABLY follow suit, but no official statement or decision has been formally made. Ontario is the first province to officially announce this change.

      --
      It's better to burn out than to fade away
    3. Re:Sleeping with an Elephant by Red+Alastor · · Score: 1

      And according to CBC (our National TV), we *will* follow suit.

      --
      Slashdot anagrams to "Sad Sloth"
    4. Re:Sleeping with an Elephant by Oliver+Defacszio · · Score: 3, Insightful
      It's not Canada it's Ontario.

      Man, if I had a nickle for every time I've heard that.

      --

      -
      Inventor of the term 'pardon my French'.
    5. Re:Sleeping with an Elephant by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Timezones are of provincial authority.

      You apparently don't live in the United States.

      Oh wait...

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    6. Re:Sleeping with an Elephant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to remember that the newspeople in Toronto have no clue as to what happened in Québec unless they heard it in English. Despite the fact that it has been announced for several days in French they wouldn't know.

      It is like two different countries with one having no clue what happens in the other. Québec is usually well informed as
      to what happens in Ontario but Ontario rarely knows what is going on in Québec.

      One has to remember the election that decided on having free trade with the USA.

      On the French Canadian TV it looked like a party
      on CBC (English Canadian TV) it looked like a funeral

    7. Re:Sleeping with an Elephant by Minwee · · Score: 1
      The old saying was said in 1969 by then Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau in a speech to the Washington Press Club.

      "Living next to you is in some ways like sleeping with an elephant. No matter how friendly and even-tempered the beast, one is affected by every twitch and grunt."

    8. Re:Sleeping with an Elephant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ontario is in Canada, so the comment you repied to is correct. Read it again. He just said it was typical of the releationship between the US and Canada. Ontario is part of Canada. See how pointless your comment is?

    9. Re:Sleeping with an Elephant by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      You have to remember that the newspeople in Toronto have no clue as to what happened in Québec unless they heard it in English. Despite the fact that it has been announced for several days in French they wouldn't know.

      Ahhh...okay, so why don't you point to some French media confirming Quebec's change prior to this announcement. They surely have electricity and computers there, don't they?

      "It is like two different countries with one having no clue what happens in the other. Québec is usually well informed as to what happens in Ontario but Ontario rarely knows what is going on in Québec."

      Sounds like Quebecers need to pay more of their attention on their own province then, doesn't it? Or are you trying to foolishly say that Ontario needs to know more irrelevant details about Quebec's day to day grind?

    10. Re:Sleeping with an Elephant by Lije+Baley · · Score: 1

      Erm, Arizona and Indiana are INSIDE "The Elephant" and they don't roll with it. *poof*

      --
      Strange things are afoot at the Circle-K.
  8. Re:Two peas in a pod. by temojen · · Score: 1

    Right next to eachother.

  9. UN DST System by N8F8 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ****NEWS FLASH*****
    Today the EU has pledged before the UN to create a new UN controlled Daylight Saving Time system. Emperor Bono of the EU declared this pre-emtive strike a hit back at US hegemony over Savings time.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:UN DST System by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1

      Funny you mention daylight savings, and a singer who can't count within the same sentence.

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  10. Great idea for here! by MavEtJu · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wish the australian government would do the same, so that don't have to wake up stupidly early to make conference calls to the US East coast.

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
    1. Re:Great idea for here! by Cave_Monster · · Score: 1

      Won't happen ... haven't you heard the people complaining, 'it fades the curtains' or 'it confuses the cows'.

    2. Re:Great idea for here! by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i live in queensland, and despite a great deal of business being done with the southern states, you wont get the farmers or hicks in the backwaters dealing with changing their clocks twice a year. Having the sun get up at 4-30am is not as useful to 99% of the people as having a few hours to do stuff in the evening after work. WTF is with getting home from work at 6pm and it being dark?

      there is an e-petition being circulated at the moment at
      http://www.parliament.qld.gov.au/EPetitions_QLD/cg i-bin/Petitions.cgi?PetNum=553
      to try and get rid of this nonsense.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
    3. Re:Great idea for here! by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excuse me, Sir! This is a site for Nerds. We don't need the big ball of fire in the sky to "do stuff". With the undebated health risks of sun exposure, shouldn't we be implementing Daylight Limiting Time? Everything fun happens at night anyway, so why are we trying minimize our fun by saving daylight?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Great idea for here! by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Having the sun get up at 4-30am is not as useful to 99% of the people as having a few hours to do stuff in the evening after work. WTF is with getting home from work at 6pm and it being dark?

      Without DST in effect, the sun will be at its highest point in the sky at noon. Hence, if the sun is up at 4-4:30 in the morning, it will be setting at 7:30-8 in the evening, not at 6pm.

    5. Re:Great idea for here! by Engineer+Andy · · Score: 1

      nice thought, but that's not how it's working.
      sun up at 4-30 or so, sun down at six or so.

      --
      "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World" 1 John 4:14
    6. Re:Great idea for here! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once partook of a debate on the internet regarding daylight savings with a Queenslander. The sun up there had obviously got to him—he was of the belief that us "mexicans" were trying to KILL YOUR CHILDREN by screwing with your economy till you implemented daylight savings, which would then mean that the children were walking home from school when the sun was still very hot. This then increases the rate of sunburn and skin cancer, so that the children die.

      As a Victorian, of course, I thought it was something of a good idea. The world could do with a few less Queenslanders.

      Still, daylight savings time would probably make far better sense in Western Australia than Queensland, if synchronisation's important. They lose four hours a day, not just one!

    7. Re:Great idea for here! by AxelBoldt · · Score: 1
      Without DST in effect, the sun will be at its highest point in the sky at noon.

      No, it depends on where you sit in your timezone. For the vast majority of people, highest point of the sun does not occur at noon.

  11. Question... by Chickenofbristol55 · · Score: 0

    When we turn back the clocks 2 hours, do I gain 2 hours or lose 2 hours?

    --
    public class null extends java applet { System.out.print ("Tabula Rasa"); }
    1. Re:Question... by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Neither. You're instead taking two hours of daylight from the morning and putting it into the afternoon. Daylight Saving Time is intended to shift the gain in sunlit hours after the vernal equinox primarily to the hours after noon.

  12. Damn by Whiteout · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That messes _this_ up:

    http://www.stemhaus.com/firefox/foxclocks/

    But at least it gives me the opportunity for a shameless plug :)

    Actually I'll add that as an Ontario resident, and a despiser of the current US regime, I think Ontario's move is entirely pragmatic: the US accounts for perhaps 80% of Canada's exports, and presumably a large portion of that comes overland from Ontario to the Eastern US. Having said that, I'll confess to the knee-jerk reaction that I don't want _my_ clocks set by a man who can't even set his own.

    Andy

    1. Re:Damn by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      How much of Ontario's turnover is in the export business? I'd guess that most of Ontario's business is internal to the province. [I'd welcome figures that prove/reject this theory]. Serve Ontarians first, not our external customers.

      If frigging with DST benefits those of us who pay taxes to Queens Park, great. Personally I'd like to see what's best for locals, wherever they may live. If business has to adapt to a constantly changing local environment at their international customers (tax laws, import regs, even office relocations) then I am sure that keeping track of time zones is something they already do.

      No large deal was ever nixed because of a single phone call going unanswered at 9am/8am.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  13. Talk about clock in Canada... by grumpyman · · Score: 3, Funny
    It's only since 2001 that Canada just started using a 24-hour clock. Listen here

    Something about Canada prime minister 'Jean Putin' and Bush LOL.

    1. Re:Talk about clock in Canada... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nobody (at least in my area of southwestern Ontario) really uses a 24 hour clock here. I can remember seeing them in public schools but that's about it. We use AM / PM.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Talk about clock in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, that 23 hour clock was a bitch, eh?

    3. Re:Talk about clock in Canada... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      It's only since 2001 that Canada just started using a 24-hour clock.

      Jesus...that's gotta make for a long fucking day!

    4. Re:Talk about clock in Canada... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to miss the joke. You must be from Canada, we think you're slow, eh?

    5. Re:Talk about clock in Canada... by KingEomer · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure it's used in Quebec. But, then again, I think it might have always been.

    6. Re:Talk about clock in Canada... by Minwee · · Score: 1
      Did you know that seventy percent of Canadian grade 7 students couldn't locate their state on a map or name their congressman? Do you feel this indicates a crisis in Canada's education system?

      It's good to see that Canada is moving to a 24-hour clock. Now if they could just get their hours to have more than 22 minutes they'd be ready to join North America.

  14. Bangalore will have 4 time zones by anandpur · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mayor of Bangalore says "that if Bangalore isn't on the same time as the United States, it will be hurt financially"

    1. Re:Bangalore will have 4 time zones by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      Already happens in a certain Swiss bank's support center here. There are four sets of teams, code-named Tokyo, London, Singapore and New York. No prizes for guessing what each team's work-hours are.

  15. Solution: by bersl2 · · Score: 1

    UTC for everyone!

    1. Re:Solution: by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      No thanks, where the sun is in relation to the meridian I'm standing on is far more important to me than where it is in relation to Greenwich (unless I'm actually in Greenwich). I'll offer you a compromise, though, and keep the time difference between Greenwich and myself down to integer hours.

    2. Re:Solution: by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      I think the idea is, keep time constant (because it fucking is ), and then base your locality's start/stop work times on your sunrise/sunset.

      Your locality can even change the work hours based on the change in sunrise/sunset.

      But changing the time? That's like declaring that pi is 3.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    3. Re:Solution: by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I think the idea is, keep time constant (because it fucking is )"

      First off, it isn't.

      Secondly, our own biology dictates that the position of the sun overhead is more important to us than an arbitrary mechanical time standard. Mechanical time has to attempt to work with solar time or else it will be ignored.

      "and then base your locality's start/stop work times on your sunrise/sunset."

      Carrying that line of thinking to its logical conclusion leaves us all using sundials and completely ignoring atomic time.

      Time zones and DST are both compromises on the part of mechanical timekeeping, keeping it acceptably close to solar time for the sake of both usability and promoting adoption.

      "But changing the time? That's like declaring that pi is 3."

      There is no end to pi. There has to be a point where you truncate it to a manageable number of digits so that you can actually use it.

    4. Re:Solution: by KenAndCorey · · Score: 1

      I don't see why we can't all use UTC. People in the southern hemisphere don't change months to match the seasons. January in Sydney is Summer, and January in London is Winter. No one is confused. If we were to follow timezone logic for months, then the southern hemisphere should offset their calendars by six months and January would be winter everywhere.

      I know it will never happen, but after doing UTC and Daylight Saving Time conversions for the past 12 months at work, it would be SO much easier if everyone just used UTC.

    5. Re:Solution: by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      First off, you're wrong: the article you referenced said that "sundial time" varies from "clock time" by as much as 16 min, 33 sec. That's not what I said, though: I said that time is constant. And it is: time marches forward one second every second, regardless of what angle the earth is at relative to the sun. (I.e., a sundial is artificial when talking about absolute time; thanks for pointing that out, but 16.55 minutes is "nothing" compared to transporting us an hour into the future/past.)

      Second, of course there's no end to pi. I was referring to this attempt at passing a law.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    6. Re:Solution: by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I don't see why we can't all use UTC. People in the southern hemisphere don't change months to match the seasons. January in Sydney is Summer, and January in London is Winter."

      What you're proposing is that Australians call July "summer," in spite of all the snow on the ground, because that's what season it is in Greenwich. Time zones are similar to what we see instead, allowing people to adjust their clocks so that "noon" (or "afternoon," "morning" and "night," for that matter) more closely corresponds to where the sun is in the sky over their own heads rather than where it is according to Greenwich.

      What we're talking about here is physical human perception. Your calendar analogy doens't hold up well because the Gregorian Calendar's track record for predicting weather is sketchy as it is without crossing the Equator. But where the sun is in the sky over the course of a given day is far more regular and far easier to perceive, and while it may have taken millennia for Western culture to devise a solar calendar that nails down the vernal equinox to two days in March, noon has always been noon.

      "after doing UTC and Daylight Saving Time conversions for the past 12 months at work, it would be SO much easier if everyone just used UTC."

      I'm not saying it wouldn't be easier for you, but it certainly wouldn't be easier for most of the planet.

    7. Re:Solution: by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "the article you referenced said that "sundial time" varies from "clock time" by as much as 16 min, 33 sec. That's not what I said, though: I said that time is constant. And it is: time marches forward one second every second, regardless of what angle the earth is at relative to the sun."

      Well, if you'd rather talk special relativity, I can do that as well.

      But time that "marches forward one second every second" doesn't matter to people as much as you seem to think. It is the sun, not cesium isotopes, that our biology is designed to follow, and because of our strong ties to the solar cycle, humans are fundamentally more interested in solar time than atomic time. If clocks do not at least try to resemble sundials, people will abandon clocks in favor of sundials.

      Or have the efforts to put Linux on the desktop taught you people nothing?

      "Second, of course there's no end to pi. I was referring to this attempt at passing a law."

      I was attempting to use your analogy and make it my own. You seem to be against any consession for the sake of functionality and usability, wanting to abandon 3.14159 just as much as you want to abandon 3 because "they're not really pi."

      Just as changing the definition of pi doesn't change the ratio of circumferences to diameters, changing the definition of time to cesium isotopes doesn't change the position of the sun in the sky. Most people don't use mechanical timepieces because they're better than solar time, they use clocks because they resemble solar time. A nice, round integer like 3 is better than the true definition of pi, but we don't use 3 because what we get don't resemble circles.

    8. Re:Solution: by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      it would be SO much easier if everyone just used UTC.

      How about siderial time? You measure the rotation of the Earth in absolute terms (taking out the orbit around the sun) so that the time of sunrise goes once around the clock over the year.

  16. And half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Half an hour later in Newfoundland

  17. Sleeping with an Elephant-sleep apnea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "When you sleep with an elephant, if it rolls, you roll."

    I'd rather sleep with a woman. When she rolls...er, never mind.

  18. The truth about the Canadian minute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you know that a Canadian minute is actually longer than an American minute due to a strange anomaly in the space-time continuum? Iowa Governor Thomas Vilsack did!

  19. Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by saskboy · · Score: 0, Troll
    This time change is such a boondoggle. Here's some facts:
    - The amount of oil predicted to be saved over the several weeks involved in the time shift, is less than all of the oil the USA uses in a SINGLE day.

    - There are going to be millions of VCRs and other hard coded devices designed to change to the old DST law, meaning many will auto-adjust to the wrong time.

    - Airlines and other businesses that depend on time are going to have to reprogram many things, and thus this will impact their bottom line. [Is this a good thing when so many are going bankrupt?]

    - If we legislated that vehicles must achieve twice the MPG rating they have today, then we'd use approximately half as much oil. That's a savings of 50% every single day. [Maybe if George thought about that every...single...day, just like he thinks about the Iraq War every..single..Day, then we wouldn't have to put up and deal with this stupid time change!]


    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by circusboy · · Score: 1

      - There are going to be millions of VCRs and other hard coded devices designed to change to the old DST law, meaning many will auto-adjust to the wrong time.

      what better way to force people to upgrade to the new Digital HD equipment...

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    2. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "So we shouldn't do it because it doesn't hit some arbitrary limit."

      As with any choice there are trade-offs. Saving oil is good, but there are better ways to do it, and ways that cause less harm or disruption like this new time law.

      "The high price of oil products will address this issue without dragging Bush into the equation. Free Market strikes again."

          The only thing high oil prices addresses is the Bush family pocketbook. Oil is a commodity that people can't avoid having a stake in, since all of our goods rely on it. If you aren't an oil owner, you're an oil buyer, so high oil prices hurt even if you buy a Prius. Farmers aren't going to combine using a Prius.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    3. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by lancejjj · · Score: 1

      Here's some facts: [...] There are going to be millions of VCRs and other hard coded devices designed to change to the old DST law, meaning many will auto-adjust to the wrong time.

      Well, no, I guess those are NOT all facts, just guesses.

      XDS, the data system that is used to transmit the time to your VCR, includes a bit indicating Daylight time versus Standard time. That bit is transmitted by the time provider (your local TV station).

      The algorithm is not hard-coded on any of the VCRs that use my former employer's XDS-capable chip [most?]. We just used the indicator from the XDS data stream... that was the only right way to do it. I'd be shocked if any vendor bothered to bake in all the various time rules into their devices... especially since the rules change all the time. DST rules changed most recently in the USA in the 1980s.

    4. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Airlines and other businesses that depend on time are going to have to reprogram many things, and thus this will impact their bottom line. [Is this a good thing when so many are going bankrupt?]

      Being in airline IT, I can tell you that the changes to our systems have almost zero cost. Being an international carrier, we deal with time rule changes just about every month. We know how to handle these changes with ease. Just because this one happens in the US doesn't make it any different.

      Airlines WANT to declare bankruptcy. Airlines are going bankrupt because corporate laws are such that declaring bankruptcy results in the airline not having to pay money to those people it owe, and results in the cancellation of existing contracts.

    5. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If we legislated that vehicles must achieve twice the MPG rating they have today, then we'd use approximately half as much oil. That's a savings of 50% every single day.

      You're right! I say why shoot so low?

      Let's legislate those flying cars we were supposed to have by now. Oh, and while we are at it, how about legislating a cure for cancer and AIDS?

      Hell, we might as well legislate against murder. Yo know, ban it. Then there'll be no more murder!

      This is amazing! We can fix anything just by passing a law!

      Right?

    6. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "There are going to be millions of VCRs and other hard coded devices designed to change to the old DST law, meaning many will auto-adjust to the wrong time."

      The federal government is not responsible for poor design in consumer goods, or else we should have passed a "Y2K Saving Time" law stating that the year after 1999 is 1900 again.

      If you can put a longwave receiver in my watch to tell it when DST starts or stops, you can put one in a VCR.

      "Airlines and other businesses that depend on time are going to have to reprogram many things, and thus this will impact their bottom line."

      Again, the federal government is not responsible for poor design.

      Besides, the change to Daylight Time and back is technically not a change of clocks so much as a change in time zones ("Eastern Daylight Time" is just a fancy name for "Atlantic Standard Time"). And if airlines can't handle changing time zones, they've got problems beyond DST.

      "If we legislated that vehicles must achieve twice the MPG rating they have today,"

      The Interstate Commerce Clause has been strained to the breaking point as it is, thankyouverymuch. The Weights and Measures Clause, on the other hand, works just fine and has yet to infringe on, say, Arizona's right to ignore DST entirely (and, coincidentally, the Mexican state of Sonora has chosen to ignore DST because of its shared border and commerce with Arizona)

    7. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - If we legislated that vehicles must achieve twice the MPG rating they have today, then we'd use approximately half as much oil. That's a savings of 50% every single day.

      Overall, I agree that DST is a waste, however, I do have a beef with this portion of the comment posted above.
      First: legislate that cars get 50% better gas milage? How do you plan to do that? Legislate that people can't buy SUVs? Legislate that companies can't manufacture SUVs? Or legislate that currently unknown technology come out of thin air? Theoretically there are ways to get better gas mileage with our current style of vehicle--hybrids, etc., but the higher cost of the vehicle outstrips the savings on gas. The government would have to legislate that car companies make hybrids cheap (which, by the way, are not that great on fuel efficiency anyway). There is hydrogen technology out there, but that has a great many of its own problems. Basically, you are asking for socialism, which the US veers away from.

      Second, even if the government required every car built from now on to get 50 miles per gallon, it would not change the amount of oil used. The change would cost the auto companies so much that the cars would have to sell for an astronomical price no one would pay, and it still would not remove from the road all of the 1969 454 Chevelles. Even if the 50mpg cars sold for the same price, they would still take a long, long time to make a difference in the overall fuel consumption of the nation.

    8. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by TCQuad · · Score: 1

      - The amount of oil predicted to be saved over the several weeks involved in the time shift, is less than all of the oil the USA uses in a SINGLE day.

      While I agree this is not the most potent measure (following the links from NIST to webexhibits gives a figure of about 1% energy savings), anything that aids in getting the concept of conservation into the mainstream shouldn't be immediately derided as ineffectual. Let's be honest: any critical system will have an upgrade process for patching and this is the simplest patch in history. It's just changing one database of dates. Everything else? Mostly upgradable. The only things that won't be are watches, VCRs, microwaves, etc. that are dependent on time but not networked.

      At this juncture, let it be. Explain to your parents how to set the time on their VCRs and then explain whatever new conservation energy bill has just been proposed as x number of daylight savings bills. It'll be the easy to comprehend benchmark, like "times the national debt" or "flaming Libraries of Congress".

    9. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by stienman · · Score: 1

      - The amount of oil predicted to be saved over the several weeks involved in the time shift, is less than all of the oil the USA uses in a SINGLE day.

      You are so right! I think you've convinced me that if we can't reduce consumption by at least [arbitrary] percent then we shouldn't reduce consumption at all! What a logical thought!

      - There are going to be millions of VCRs and other hard coded devices designed to change to the old DST law, meaning many will auto-adjust to the wrong time.

      Perhaps I haven't kept up with technology, but my VCRs and alarm clocks don't adjust to DST. My "atomic" radio clocks will adjust according to NIST. My computers will adjust correctly. I imagine even Tivo will manage just fine.

      Oh, I'm sorry, were you trying to bring up another y2k type scarecrow? Oh no! I can't adjust my clocks by hand! The world shall end!

      - Airlines and other businesses that depend on time are going to have to reprogram many things, and thus this will impact their bottom line. [Is this a good thing when so many are going bankrupt?]

      Oh no! The world shall end!

      - If we legislated that vehicles must achieve twice the MPG rating they have today, then we'd use approximately half as much oil. That's a savings of 50% every single day. [Maybe if George thought about that every...single...day, just like he thinks about the Iraq War every..single..Day, then we wouldn't have to put up and deal with this stupid time change!]

      Ah, back to the "if we can't save [arbitrary] consumption, it's best not to try at all" argument.

      DST is such a non-issue, and I say that if we can save some energy by adjusting our clocks (because us stupid humans like to live by the clock) then by all means let's go for it. Other countries change the DST change dates on a yearly basis, and so most electronic and computer hardware is already equiped to deal with this. Yes, there is some US-centric equipment whose designers, like MBA graduates, look only to the short term and those items will suffer.

      Is it worth all the consternation you're working up? I don't think so, but I'm not you, and perhaps this is the most important activity you need to spend time and resources on in your life.

      -Adam

    10. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by KingEomer · · Score: 1

      Ummm. What about oil used for heating? For industry? For Electricity? I'm pretty sure that uses much more oil than transportation. Or, at least, it's significant enough that there won't be a 1-to-1 correspondance between percentage decreases of fuel consumption in cars to the total used.

    11. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "My computers will adjust correctly."
      Only if they are patched, or work off a time server. And even then, you might not realize a bug is there until something goes wrong.

      If DST is such a non-issue, then why is Bush and gang touting it as such a monumental energy saver? When was the last time you saw a business besides pro sports or construction not using lights simply because it was daytime outside?
      How is it going to benefit children and the workforce to go to school and work in the dark?

      "You are so right! I think you've convinced me that if we can't reduce consumption by at least [arbitrary] percent then we shouldn't reduce consumption at all! What a logical thought!"
      Why thank you. It's good of you to notice that red herrings should be ignored, instead of being touted as energy saving measures. This is a make-work project for computer programmers, while giving the ignorant population the warm fuzzy feeling that Bush really gives half a crap about energy conservation, while it doesn't really conserve a significant portion of energy.

      There are real ways of conserving energy, and DST isn't one of them.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    12. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      Yes, you're right, I was referring to oil in the transportation industry, where we have the technology to roll out more efficient engines, but we aren't doing it because it's more important for people to have the RIGHT to buy a 9MPG SUV, than it is to have the right to breath.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    13. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Farmers aren't going to combine using a Prius.

      I hope that John Deere (not the military communications spammer; the farm equipment producer) is currently working on Prius-type technology for their farm equipment. If not, their competitors surely are!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    14. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "I mean if we're changing time around why not the measurements as well."

      The Constitution gives Congress the power to set standards (e. g. "meter means 39.37 inches" or the later "foot means 0.3048 meter"), but nothing's in there about the power to compell people to use them. This is why parts of the country ignores Daylight Saving Time to begin with.

      On the other hand, there's really nothing in th Constitution preventing the states from compelling metric usage, but I give it a week before somebody challenges it in federal court on Interstate Commerce grounds.

    15. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf are you talking about, military comm spam?

    16. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personal vehicles do not make up 50% of all oil consumption in the US.

    17. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      " Personal vehicles do not make up 50% of all oil consumption in the US. "

      Nice comprehension there AC. What's 50% of 50%? 25%.

      But that's not the point. The point is about 50% of the oil consumed for transportation in all new vehicles could be saved by making all new vehicles twice as efficient. It's a lofty goal, but not unattainable.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    18. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by zsau · · Score: 1

      Pardon me for being an idiot, but I've often heard the argument of hard-coded, auto-changing VCRs. It doesn't seem to make sense that they exist. Do they? How many people have them? They can't be all that important, surely, because even in the US not every state has daylight savings; and in different places daylight savings starts at different times (frex, in here in Australia, it starts at the beginning of October in Tasmania, the end of October in Victoria, New South Wales, South Australia and the ACT, and doesn't happen in the remaining states and territories. Compare October with the March-or-what it starts in in the US). In fact in 2000 for the Olympics, we started daylight savings in September so that it it happened while the Olympics were on, so that Americans would be able to watch them better, or something.

      So are there really millions of these hard-coded auto-changing VCRs that it's a legitimate argument? Do people who make them just limit their market (to the admittedly sizable) region that has daylight savings for the same period as most of the US?

      (Personally, as a Victorian, I'd prefer we started daylight savings at the start of October, same as Tasmania—it makes sleeping much easier.)

      --
      Look out!
    19. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be a bit cryptic, it was a joke at the "dear john" letters that are becoming more and more common as stays in Iraq are extended.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    20. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by klparrot · · Score: 1
      Only if they are patched, or work off a time server. And even then, you might not realize a bug is there until something goes wrong.

      IIRC, NTP only gives you UTC. To determine what time to show, your computer relies on locally-stored static time zone information. So even synching with a time server doesn't solve the problem. As you also mentioned, though, patching would work.

    21. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by AaronGTurner · · Score: 1
      As important as improved fuel efficiency is the improvement of traffic flows and reduction of total distances travelled as this impacts all cars by reducing fuel efficiency per mile of all cars apart from electric and some hybirds.

      Reducing congestion is difficult, though, as people will tend to drive up to their maximum congestion tolerance level - i.e. the point at which the commute gets too tedious. Building additional roads works for a period of time but may simply encourage more people to drive on them until such time as the commute tedium threshold is reached again, at which point there are more total cars stuck in congestion. I am not sure there is really a solution, except that if congested commutes are short the total number of congested miles is shorter. Changing junctions to reduce cars bunching up, which can cause congestion miles away, would help. Even changing traffic light timing can help.

    22. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by amightywind · · Score: 1

      The amount of oil predicted to be saved over the several weeks involved in the time shift, is less than all of the oil the USA uses in a SINGLE day.

      Sounds like about 5% to me. Your statement supports the opposite view.

      There are going to be millions of VCRs and other hard coded devices designed to change to the old DST law, meaning many will auto-adjust to the wrong time.

      A the US should waste millions of barrels of oil because some programmers chose a crude hack to adjust time? Also, VCR use is in rapid decline.

      Airlines and other businesses that depend on time are going to have to reprogram many things, and thus this will impact their bottom line. [Is this a good thing when so many are going bankrupt?]

      The airlines might have taken some of the 10's of billions the feds gave them after 9/11 to do this. Your point is adsurd.

      If we legislated that vehicles must achieve twice the MPG rating they have today, then we'd use approximately half as much oil. That's a savings of 50% every single day. [Maybe if George thought about that every...single...day, just like he thinks about the Iraq War every..single..Day, then we wouldn't have to put up and deal with this stupid time change!]

      Great idea. In mandating hybrids the average cost of a car doubles, meaning large segments of the population can't afford to drive. What George Bush really needs to do is levy a large tribute in oil from Iraq in payment for freeing their country. Say 25% of their production. GDub rocks!

      --
      an ill wind that blows no good
    23. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      "In mandating hybrids the average cost of a car doubles, meaning large segments of the population can't afford to drive. What George Bush really needs to do is levy a large tribute in oil from Iraq in payment for freeing their country. Say 25% of their production. GDub rocks!"

      From the last part of your comment, it's clear you're just joking. And simple economics tells us that with more hybrids supplied to us, the cost will go down.
      Most Americans are going to have trouble filling their 10MPG SUV in a couple years, if you want to talk about absurd points. And those are only the Americans who can afford an SUV, there are millions more with no car at all.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    24. Re:Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      When Canada was first being more-or-less forcibly converted to the Metric system, it was illegal for businesses to post signs, mail flyers, or sell stuff labelled in both Imperial and Metric sizes.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  20. Re:Rawr by serfx · · Score: 1

    i'm with you on that

  21. Zulu works for me. by Fen14 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    No daylight savings, no time zones, no AM/PM even! It's just GMT 24hour.

    1. Re:Zulu works for me. by Yehooti · · Score: 1

      I agree. After decades of working rotating shifts, any hour works for me, just don't add some clock-shift crap to the equation. If high-noon for us is 1700 hours, so be it. It's no harder to visualize that the east coast team doesn't start to work until 1500 hours than it is to figure they don't start until 8:00 a.m., or was that DST or Standard? Hate this biannual time tweak like the plague.

    2. Re:Zulu works for me. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      It's just GMT 24hour.

      I used to work on traffic signalling systems and twice a year I had to go in to work at 2 AM and change the time over on the whole system. God what a mess.

      Now I work in Air Traffic Control and everything runs on UTC. It's fantastic. I just can't get my wife to live with it at home.

  22. financial reasons? by boarder · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I've never understand the argument that a business loses money by being in a different mode of Daylight Saving Time. I grew up in Indiana and never understood why other states changed their times, but I figured maybe we were just backward or stupid (which the state is, but for wholly different reasons). When I moved out to California I learned just how stupid DST really is. It is a terrible idea. It's not just that I'm too lazy to change the 12 clocks in my house/car/office, but more that in the winter the sun goes down at like 5pm. I hate driving home in the dark and having the sun wake me up an hour earlier (all hail flex time). I've lived in both and can compare the two. The people I know who have moved from a DST state to Indiana say they like not having DST. Anyone who hasn't lived without DST can't argue with me. Indiana is changing this year to DST, and I can't wait to hear all the bitching that occurs.

    My mom has an international shipping business in Indiana and works with all time zones and all permutations of with/without DST. It has never affected her work. How can being in a different time zone affect your business? You already have to work with other time zones, so why would this affect them?

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
    1. Re:financial reasons? by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      The basic reason for DST is that some of us don't like having the sun up at 4 AM and still trying to get sleep. By shifting the clocks to 5am, that gives an extra hour of sunlight in the evening and 1 less of having as many lights on.

      As for Indiana going to DST, my understanding is that since it had a time zone running right down the middle of it, it didn't make sense for it to switch.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:financial reasons? by fideli · · Score: 1

      How is this a troll, can someone explain that to me? Yes, it's a rant, but well-justified. Calm down DST-supporting mods.

    3. Re:financial reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daylight savings time starts in the spring and ends in the fall. So your complaint that it gets dark to early in the Winter has nothing to do with DST. If we got rid of DST, the sun would set in the winter at the exact same time and you would still be driving home in the dark. DST is why you get an extra hour of sunlight in the evening during the summer.

      Now if you wanted to argue that we should stay on DST all year (or shift time zones) - you could then get the extra hour in the winter. Until that happens, I suggest living as far west in a given timezone as you can, to get the latest sunset possible. Indiana comes to mind.

    4. Re:financial reasons? by TCQuad · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you want to be really specific about it, the Eastern time zone should end about half-way through Ohio. All of Michigan should be in Central time. That's what's causing the most discussion in my neck of the woods (northwestern Indiana), since there seems to be some consensus that since we're near Michigan, we should go to Eastern.

      This is the problem with local governments deciding time zones. Everyone has a half-baked reason why we should be eastern, when if you look at the freakin' map, we're clearly central. But, since we want to be on the same time as Detroit, NYC and Boston, we'll end up like Michigan and parts of Kentucky in the Eastern time zone while completely ignoring those pesky scientists screaming about their logic.

      Sorry. That's been simmering for a while.

    5. Re:financial reasons? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " How can being in a different time zone affect your business? "
      think stocks/trade/wallstreet.

      "I hate driving home in the dark and having the sun wake me up an hour earlier (all hail flex time)."

      DST the sun will come up later. well, naturally I mean the the time will be later. (Only slashdot would be so pendantic that I catually have to say that I mean the clocks. )

      "Anyone who hasn't lived without DST can't argue with me."
      That is a fallacy. That like saying I've never been to the moon, so I can't argue that 1/6 gravity makes me lighter. If it was true, it would also mean that people who have always had DST can't agree with you also. Idiocy.

      Havine lived in a state without DST, and states with it, I can say that I think DST(in general) is a good idea as a whole.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:financial reasons? by parking_god · · Score: 1

      One financial argument is that it reinforces the stereotype of Indiana as a bunch of backwards-assed country fscks who don't know how to change their damn clocks, and why on earth should anyone do business with them?

      I've been living on Indiana Stupid Time for fifteen years now (after 25 years in DST states) and am damn glad that we're finally adopting DST. I am tired of explaining to people elsewhere in the country that our time difference varies depending on what time of year it is.

      This was especially fun last fall, when I worked on a program that hosted daily teleconferences with participants from all six* CONUS time zones - we reminded them daily for a week before the time change that our time difference would also be changing. It took us a week after the time change to get everybody to hook up at the correct time. I don't necessarily want to call BS on the parent post, but our mileage DEFINITELY varied.

      Not that I'm a diehard DST fan or anything - I'd be just as happy if the whole country dumped DST altogether, either by Springing Ahead and never Falling Back again or vice versa.

      (* Eastern, Central, Mountain, Pacific, Indiana Stupid, Arizona Stupid)

      --
      Brandishing Dangerous Logic
    7. Re:financial reasons? by boarder · · Score: 1

      I misstated my argument. I, like you, want to have that extra sleep in the summer which DST provides. I don't like the winter, however, when there isn't DST anymore and the sun wakes me up early. What I should've said is that I wish DST were used year round. Everyone should move their clocks permanently.

      With Indiana making the switch, it has become a huge battle. 1/3 the state wants to be in Eastern, another 1/3 wants to be Central, and the other 1/3 want to not switch at all. We don't want to end up like Kentucky and Tennessee with a time zone splitting the state, but people in the border towns don't want their neighbors in the next state having a different time zone either.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
  23. Blame Canada by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

    Any idea how?

  24. Re:Rawr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're a copraphilliac?

  25. Re:ONLY FAGGOT ASS NIGGERS VISIT SOMETHINGAWFUL.CO by netkid91 · · Score: 0

    Where are the mods??? I really wish I had mod points to put this at -1, AND DESTROY HIS KARMA. *Devil Grin*

    --
    NO~, I read Slashdot because I think it's stupid.....
  26. If you can't spell 'wow' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what are you doing with a keyboard?

  27. Nice move Bush.... Idiot!-Bush Jabbing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The amount of oil predicted to be saved over the several weeks involved in the time shift, is less than all of the oil the USA uses in a SINGLE day."

    So we shouldn't do it because it doesn't hit some arbitrary limit.

    "There are going to be millions of VCRs and other hard coded devices designed to change to the old DST law, meaning many will auto-adjust to the wrong time."

    Poor design-a la Y2K.

    "Airlines and other businesses that depend on time are going to have to reprogram many things, and thus this will impact their bottom line. [Is this a good thing when so many are going bankrupt?]"

    Poor design AND poor managment.

    "If we legislated that vehicles must achieve twice the MPG rating they have today, then we'd use approximately half as much oil. That's a savings of 50% every single day. [Maybe if George thought about that every...single...day, just like he thinks about the Iraq War every..single..Day, then we wouldn't have to put up and deal with this stupid time change!]
    "

    The high price of oil products will address this issue without dragging Bush into the equation. Free Market strikes again.

  28. 2007? by davidc · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean we have to wait until 2007 for this paltry half-assed extension of DST?

    Ugh! Government moves real slow, doesn't it? Come the bird flu we are doomed.

    We should adopt Double DST - as done in Europe in WWII. I don't mind geting up in the dark - hey, in the winter it happens whatever the clock says - but having lived in more northern latitudes I have to say that it is a PITA when it gets dark at 3:30 p.m. or so.

    Yes, I know you guys in Alaska get nearly 24h dark in the winter. Sorry! Can't buck nature..

    1. Re:2007? by Craig+Ringer · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think you'll find that it's business that moves really slowly. There are a *lot* of legacy systems out there that must be adjusted to the new rules, plus businesses need to work out what operational changes are required, how this will affect their dealings with other companies, etc. While the same is true of government, I suspect business will be the critical factor here since this decision is economically driven in the first place.

      The legacy systems issue is especially crucial. I should know, since I'm the poor bastard in charge of one in Western Australia. We recently rejected adopting daylight savings (I've lived with and without; I don't care either way), and the two main negative argument was cost and disruption to business.

      Of course, other negative arguments included "we'll have to get up earlier" (farmers) and "the curtains will fade faster." I kid you not. Yep, we're going to use scary weird magic to just /add/ an hour of daylight, that's it...

    2. Re:2007? by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I know you guys in Alaska get nearly 24h dark in the winter. Sorry! Can't buck nature..

      Sure you can - Live somewhere sane.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    3. Re:2007? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having lived through a season of double DST, I can tell you the problem is not getting up in the dark, the problem is going to bed in the light.

  29. typical response by uccemebug · · Score: 1

    I'm not surprised at the whining from my fellow Ontarioans - after all, it is the provincial sport.

    It's stupid to think that Ontario would do otherwise than adopt the US change. Ontario is in the business of selling goods (mostly cars & parts) to the US. Allowing for a difference in time changes would cost far more aggravation than will the three extra hours of DST for people too dim to figure out their VCR's. The TSX will have to remain in the same time zone as the New York indices, as well, if it wants to retain any relevancy at all.

  30. This makes sense by Husgaard · · Score: 3, Informative
    Some years back each european country had their own rules for DST. Travelling through Europe around the times of year when changing to/from DST was hell if you wanted to know the local time.

    Then EU kicked in and harmonized the rules for changing to and from DST, and this had made everything a lot easier. Even EU countries in different time zones have the same rules, so you know the time difference is always the same.

    To me it really makes sense that nearby countries want to have the same rules for changing to/from DST.

    1. Re:This makes sense by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      When I was a kid, DST or no DST was decided on a town-by-town basis in the province where I live. It made things very interesting when making a doctor's appointment in the next town and other things like that.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  31. This is the best the magic wand can do by Y-Crate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The entire practice of Daylight Savings time is inane and utterly ridiculous.

    The primary reason for changing it yet again is to reduce overall fuel consumption. So, instead of mandating higher fuel economy (the average being lower than it was two decades ago) we choose to change time.

    Just stop and think about that for a moment. The insanity of it threatens to collapse in on itself and tear a hole in the universe.

    George H.W. Bush once said in response to calls for conservation that "The American way of life is not negotiable." We want what we want, when we want it, without having to deal with the realities and consequences of acquiring it. It's too inconvenient to consider that we might be taking the wrong road. We Americans get viciously defensive when anyone questions our habits and have to largely be forced into making any changes that will benefit us in the long-term. What pleases us this instant is usually the only concern we have.

    We assume that any problems can be glossed over and this stands as a prime example of glossing over a major one at our own peril. When gas prices rise, legions demand that the president "Do something about it". Just wave the magic wand, make the problem go away, let us go back to living the way we want to, even if it isn't sustainable, simply because we desire it. There is nothing wrong with desiring something, but having unrealistic expectations for receiving it is pure greed. I could stand up and demand that the local bank hand over a large sum of cash just because, but my desire alone does not validate my demand. We act as if we deserve low gas prices simply because we want them to be low and cannot reconcile the demand/price relationship whatsoever.

    If you choose to drive a vehicle that gets 12mpg, you really have no leg to stand on when you bitch about rising gas prices. You are part of the problem. You cannot, and should not be protected from the widespread impact of your choice. You are not a child. Grow up.

    When you buy into sprawl by moving into the latest subdivision on the edge of the city to escape the last subdivision you lived in on the old edge of the city, you do not generate much sympathy when you complain about your traffic woes, lack of greenspace or rising taxes. You are making the decision to encourage the kind of development which is unsustainable and lowers your quality of life. (Note: I know in some areas, there is little choice about the kind of neighborhood you live in - sprawl is the only option, but many, many people continue to move further and further out to the same kind of development they already live in expecting the process not to repeat and that they will somehow escape the sprawl, and become indignant when they have to deal with the consequences I mentioned above. This example referred to the active supporters of the lifestyle and not the helpless participants who have no other choice.)

    I may want to eat ice cream all day, but if I choose to do that (which I do not) I cannot demand to be thin. Most people would laugh at me if I did. Yet, when we are greedy and selfish in other ways, we act as if some Constitutional amendment has been violated if we actually have to face up to the effects our actions produce.

    Time to take out the pacifier and deal with matters properly.

    1. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      sprawl is the result of a growing population, the only way to get rid of it is to keep your cock in your trousers, get the pope to agree that contraception is OK, or just kill off all the catholics and people with more than two children.

      Try living on a tiny Island like the UK and you'll appreciate what happens when people have too many kids.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    2. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by geekoid · · Score: 1

      this thinking that because the government does one thing, it couldn't do something else as well has got to stop. It's knee jerk reaction, and makes people look like an idiot.

      They also institute tax insentives for hybrids.

      "If you choose to drive a vehicle that gets 12mpg, you really have no leg to stand on when you bitch about rising gas prices. You are part of the problem. You cannot, and should not be protected from the widespread impact of your choice. You are not a child. Grow up. "

      of course they can complain. they can also take action. Justg because some chooses a vehical the gets a low MPG doesn't mean they can't complain when the prices are artificially kept high.

      Of course, you are sop obviouslty blind sided by your causes that you feel only people who belive what you do ahve a right to a voice.

      Please learn to think.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by stienman · · Score: 1

      The primary reason for changing it yet again is to reduce overall fuel consumption. So, instead of mandating higher fuel economy (the average being lower than it was two decades ago) we choose to change time.

      This is not insane - it's a perfectly legitimate decision. It's VASTLY cheaper to change DST than to mandate higher fuel economy standards.

      Aside from which, anyone who says we can save 50% on fuel economy by changing our cars either doesn't understand thermodynamics or the American buying public.

      We have cars that are very efficient, and people are still buying the less efficient cars.

      I suppose the government could impose a radical fuel savings plan that requires all cars to comply and forces the buying public to buy something they didn't want in the first place, but you can guess how well that will go over with the public.

      I may want to eat ice cream all day, but if I choose to do that (which I do not) I cannot demand to be thin.

      Exactly. And the government has no right to mandate low fat, low sugar ice cream to prevent you from being fat.

      Please note: Capitalist Economy. Democratic (well, republic) Government.

      If people wanted lower emissions cars, they'd buy them. If people wanted to mandate what kind of car their neighbors can or cannot drive, we'd be driving them. If people don't mind the government changing the DST... well, guess what? Apparantly people don't mind!

      -Adam

    4. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Drunk, again?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    5. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by toddestan · · Score: 1

      This is not insane - it's a perfectly legitimate decision. It's VASTLY cheaper to change DST than to mandate higher fuel economy standards.

      Yeah, at a 1% energy savings per day that DST is in effect. The total savings from this change is less energy than Americans use in a day. A 1MPG increase in the nation's fleet of vehicles would be a 5% savings (and that's taking the average MPG of a vehicle to be 20MPG, which might be a bit generous). Heck, a national campaign to get people to properly inflate their tires would save more energy with less hassle - and probably would save some lives too. Changing DST is a just a feel-good measure that will probably end up causing more problems than it solves.

    6. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So. You think its reasonable that the Government jerry-rigs the DST instead of trying to lead americans towards making WISE decisions?

      let GM, FORD and Chrysler convince you to buy an idiot SUV, Truck or other gas-waster is "OK" -- but the government saying "hey, dummies, gas aint cheap. its costing us a fortune. its polluting. sprawl is wasteful and expensive. lets move away from our car-lust" is a BAD message?

      your some kind of idiot eh... but pro-consumption propaganda dominating public discourse is acceptable?

    7. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by Raven_Stark · · Score: 1

      When people behave like children, one must often deal with them as if they were children.

      The rest of the world should consider investing their fuel tax revenues into building huge oil tanks and stockpiling crude oil. This should cause crude prices to go up around the world so that Americans can't continue to drive land yachts. Adjust your tax rates to keep your prices unchanged at the pump. When the oil wells dry up, you all can keep your stockpile for yourselves or sell it to us at a nice profit. Even George Bush wouldn't be dumb enough to go to war against the entire world over oil, we'd lose.

      --
      http://www.marxist.com/
    8. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by ergo98 · · Score: 1

      This is not insane - it's a perfectly legitimate decision. It's VASTLY cheaper to change DST than to mandate higher fuel economy standards.

      Are you kidding? I remember several years back I was comparing gas mileage between "Domestic" vehicles, and "Imports". Apart from a couple of brands (Hyundai), the imports won by a landslide - the Cavalier, for instance, used 25% more fuel than a very comparable Honda Civic or Toyota Corolla. _25%_ This is for a car that is on the road in the millions, and clearly it wasn't an economic reason because they were all priced within the same range (and are all made here in North America)

      Is it true that most consumers don't care? Absolutely. But if you're going to talk about fucking with the clock to theoretically (I call bullshit on it) save energy, at least go after the low hanging fruit first.

    9. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      You're right! Gas prices are too high!

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    10. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by CKW · · Score: 2, Interesting

      .

      I live in an apartment in the heart of the 5th biggest city in North America. I walk to work. I've made choices in my life that allow me to do this.

      I wish I could buy an affordable house *and* walk to work. But the only affordable houses are 1 - 1.5 hours commute from here. Which sucks the big one. Who the hell wants to spend 2-3 hours a day commuting. But tons and tons of people do so, because they want a) a house, and b) a job they like.

      But what forces companies to have their headquarters in the core of big-ass cities where they are "hard" to get to? Okay it's a natural progression from the olden days when cities weren't that dense, and you'd want to be near other businesses. But that was before telephones, before VOIP and $40 web-phones and modern systems. Right now most companies need to be in expensive centrally located cities like they need a hole in their head. My company's people spend 99% of their time dealing with people THOUSANDS of miles away. We sell our product WORLDWIDE, if sales reps or SE's want to see the customer, they have to get on airplanes.

      The company could *easily* move the location 50 miles north, to a place where tons of us employees could get a nice affordable house within a 15 mile radius and only have a 20 minute commute to work. I think lots of companies could do this.

      Funny thing is the provincial body that oversees development (reviews and hears objections to city zoning plans/rules) has been given the mission of "intensifying" the cities. I betcha that is FOR business, not at all in the interests of the general citizenry. Apartments in central Vancouver are getting as small as 300 square feet. That's not living space. That's a dog cage. That's not acceptable. I do not want to live my life in an apartment.

      Yes yes you're worried about "urban sprawl". First of all as soon as the rest of the world gets itself worked up to 1st world status - the birth rates should level out to the point where sprawl will stop - because there won't be "more and more" people. And in any case the only reason people don't like "sprawl" is because it creates choked roads, because people can't buy a house close to work, because work is in the core of an ultra expensive city core. See where I'm going? That leads me to the only other reason people "don't like sprawl" - becuase the sprawl is concentrated around single areas, so you end up with 200 miles of concrete. If the sprawl was broken up with places of work distributed around - same land area, a house for everyone instead of apartments - just not all together, no one would care.

      Take a look at a map of a place like Ontario. The sprawl is concentrated to within 40 miles of Lake Ontario. Northern Ontario is EMPTY. Okay it's a bit colder there. But it's no further north than a lot of the rest of Canada, and still further south than places like Sweden and Norway.

      So - how the hell do we convince companies to start spreading out their sites a bit better? So we can all live in houses in nice little 50-250,000 person cities surrounded by countryside?

      I guess the only real method we have of doing that - is to move. We go there and maybe the jobs will follow? Okay maybe you'll have to take a pay cut and get a job in a slightly different industry - but at least you'll be able to afford a house.

      Either that or start talking about it with everyone that will listen, and maybe someday an exec will follow through.

      .

    11. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by CKW · · Score: 1

      .

      I tell ya one thing that would keep me in the big city for the rest of my life. A spacious affordable tower-condo/apartment. Really spacious. An apartment building that has a pool and sun-roof on top. Fast elevators. Fast subway.

      So why the fuck haven't engineers figured out how to mass manufacture concrete and buildings anyways? Why does a 700 square foot 1-small-bedroom apartment cost $250,000 CDN? For $300,000 I want to see 1500-2000 square feet. It's only concrete. What the hell is the problem? None of the rest of the overhead goes up. And I think a TON of the rest of the overhead is fixed - advertising, legal/planning with the city/boards, building the basement/foundation (man it takes them a while to do that).

      I wonder if it isn't silly stupid zoning rules. I know they want to prevent too many people from living in a given land footprint - for good reasons too - because otherwise it would require too much infrastructure and clog the roads, etc etc. But I wonder if they haven't worded the restrictions wrong. I wonder if the restrictions are by "floorspace" instead of "occupants". That would just FUCKING suck.

      Man, I gotta write some provincial politicians, boards, building companies, and my city councillor/mayor about these things. Get the zoning plans reviewed to see if they are effectively forcing companies to artificially restrict the sizes of apartments - worried that if they build 1500 square foot aparmtents that 6 people will live in them...

      .

    12. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by CKW · · Score: 1

      > An apartment building that has a pool and sun-roof on top

      Man you wouldn't BELIEVE how many buildings do not have ANY outdoor space on them. A *spectacular* view and no, you have to stay indoors. Balconies don't cut it, they are the first things to start looking shabby and you can't see the sky, only half of it - and you're surrounded by other balconies. Besides if I'm at work, why can't I go relax at lunch on the top of the building and enjoy the air and the view? Noooo, we're forced to go down to the crowded street level where there's a concrete plaza whose benches have all been removed to prevent people from "lounging about".

    13. Re:This is the best the magic wand can do by Milican · · Score: 1

      The upcoming DST changes will reduce the amount of energy we use. This is good. Hopefully, market forces and high gas prices will change American buying habits for autos. If gas prices stay high people will slowly change their buying patterns on vehicles, their views of mass transportation, etc... I know the DART rail here in Dallas is now over crowded due to high fuel costs. When I drive to work I notice that the parking lot for the DART rail nearby is often overflowing with cars. Here is a quote from our local Dallas Morning news:

      "Rising gas prices are prompting a growing number of North Texas commuters to park their cars in favor of buses and trains, but Dallas Area Rapid Transit is considering service cuts to help balance its budget.

      Though DART ridership has increased 11 percent on its bus and light-rail lines and 18 percent on the Trinity Railway Express commuter line, the additional passengers have not helped the agency's finances."
      -Dallas Morning News (Subscription Required) Bugmenot.com

      Thats market forces in action and thats how capitalism works.

      JOhn

  32. Re:Great idea for here! Meet NDT. by twitter · · Score: 1
    Wish the australian government would do the same, so that don't have to wake up stupidly early to make conference calls to the US East coast.

    Awesome idea, mate! Just imagine not having to wake up early because you are already awake. By getting on US Eastern time you can live that cool all nighter life style. Siderial, smiderial, who needs sunlight?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  33. Wrong Bono by tepples · · Score: 1

    a singer who can't count

    I don't think N8F8 meant Paul "Bono" Hewson of U2. Try Chastity. And let's hope she doesn't follow in her late daddy's footsteps by 2018.

    1. Re:Wrong Bono by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, try reading the news once in awhile...

  34. It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by koick · · Score: 5, Informative

    Straight from the mighty wikipedia:

    Rationales for DST

    One of the major reasons given for observing DST in the United States is energy conservation. Theoretically, the amount of residential electricity needed in the evening hours is dependent both on when the sun sets and when people go to bed. Because people tend to observe the same bedtime year-round, by artificially moving sunset one hour later, the amount of energy used is theoretically reduced. United States Department of Transportation studies showed that DST reduces the country's electricity usage by one percent during each day DST is in effect.

    Part of the reason that it is normally observed in the late spring, summer, and early autumn is because during the winter months the amount of energy saved by moving sunset one hour later is negated by the increased need for morning lighting by moving sunrise by the same amount. During the summer most people would wake up after the sun rises, regardless of whether daylight saving time is in effect or not, so there is no increased need for morning lighting to offset the afternoon energy savings.

    Another perceived benefit of DST is increased opportunities for outdoor activities. Most people plan outdoor activities during the increased hours of sunlight. Other benefits cited include prevention of traffic injuries (by allowing more people to return home from work or school in daylight), and crime reduction (by reducing people's risk of being targets of crimes that are more common in dark areas).

    When the U.S. went on extended DST in 1974 and 1975 in response to the 1973 energy crisis, Department of Transportation studies found that observing DST in March and April saved 10,000 barrels of oil a day, and prevented about 2,000 traffic injuries and 50 fatalities saving about U.S. $28 million in traffic costs.

    1. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Well, why not just put the clock 1Hr backwards all year round? Or even better persuade companies/ the stock markets/ banks to operate 8 till 4 instead of 9 till 5.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    2. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      I don't quite understand why 9 to 5 ever became the norm anyway.. considering how "energy inefficient" it is :)

    3. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Or even better persuade companies/ the stock markets/ banks to operate 8 till 4 instead of 9 till 5."

      My company came up with a novel solution along those lines. Our office hours are 8 to 6.

    4. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Well, it's probably some average of daybreak and sunset in Europe and a legacy of industrialization. I haven't worked 9-5 for the past 10 years, but IT seems to be more flexable than other types of work.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    5. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      My company came up with a novel solution along those lines. Our office hours are 8 to 6.
      I'd quit, unless of course it really is your company in which case, Nazi!

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    6. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by billcopc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Thank you for posting the facts. I'm sick of repeating this stuff to ignorants all over the net. Daylight savings time is a pain in the butt, but it exists for a reason, and for once that reason doesn't descend from some ruler's unchecked vanity. No matter what the bureaucrats tell you, we're still animals and thus we exist according to the rules of nature. The fact that we have these ugly buildings and cube-farm hate factories is just fluff. Sunlight is a ridiculously important energy source which is why most of us live by day and sleep at night. Adapting our synthetic time system to nature's clock is only logical.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    7. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by alphaseven · · Score: 1
      Or even better persuade companies/ the stock markets/ banks to operate 8 till 4 instead of 9 till 5.

      Start work at 8 and people will complain about how early it is and that they're not getting enough sleep, but if you redefine 8 o'clock as 9 people will be happy about how much extra sunlight they're getting after work. I really hate DST.

    8. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      start work at 8 and people will complain about how early it is and that they're not getting enough sleep

      I think that after a few months the majority of people would forget ever starting work at 9, after a few years it will be like it has always been.

      It's just like Microsoft#s hiding menus, there really annoying for a while, but after a few months they only display the options you use and are really helpfull, but try and get any old skool fanboy to put up for a month.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    9. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      ...and crime reduction (by reducing people's risk of being targets of crimes that are more common in dark areas)

      As a recovering astronomer, I have many menories of how we had to fight everyone for less lighting, so we could do our research. Everyone always talked about the "more lights, less crime" theory, but nobody ever had any research to back it up. It is trivial to prove that rather than reducing crime, there is actually a positive correlation between lighting and crime rate.

      Just compare Montana and New Jersey, or Upstate NY and NYC. Lights = crime.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    10. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's just like Microsoft#s hiding menus, there really annoying for a while, but after a few months they only display the options you use and are really helpfull, but try and get any old skool fanboy to put up for a month.

      It has nothing to do with being an "old skool fanboy". I like interfaces that I can learn to the extent that I could "use them in my sleep". Specifically, I dislike interfaces like this that confound motor learning, because they basically force me to re-learn how to use the interface every time something changes.

    11. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by tknn · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Just compare Montana and New Jersey, or Upstate NY and NYC. Lights = crime. Well, that is one well-thought out argument. I am sure you were very successful in fighting for less light also.

    12. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I really hope you're kidding with that statement. That or that you're not scientifically trained at all. It's kind of trite, but in this case it's really true: correlation does not mean causation. Don't you think there might be some more important differences to explain the difference in crime (think population density).

      Steve

    13. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by koick · · Score: 1
      I thought you were high to say that there was a positive correlation between nighttime lighting and crime rate (and this is getting off-topic), but I found this interesting study:

      "In particular, while there is no statistically significant evidence that street lighting impacts the level of crime, especially if crime displacement is taken into account, there is a strong indication that increased lighting - perhaps lighting uniformity - decreases the fear of crime"

      Also in regards to light-pollution, I just learned that some of the common types of lights include:

      • Low Pressure Sodium (LPS) fixture produces a yellow tint.
      • High Pressure Sodium (HPS) fixture produces a pink tint.
      • Mercury Vapor fixture produces a blue/white tint.
      • Incandescent light (bulbs) produces a yellow/white tint.

      The first three types are a gas discharge source, and of all those only LPS can be filtered out with telescope filters.

    14. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't buy it.

      In Florida, at least, 1 more hour of sunlight = 1 less hour of lights and 1 more hour of A/C running on "high" instead of "med/low" (depending on time of year).

      Its stupidity, no matter what kind of inane justification they try to put to it.

    15. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
      why not just put the clock 1Hr backwards all year round?
      President Carter tried this back in the 1970s.
      The result was an increase in the accident rate between automobiles and schoolchildren, who were waiting for the schoolbus (or walking to the bus stop/school/etc.) in the dark.
      The plan was abandoned after one year.
      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    16. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Adapting our synthetic time system to nature's clock is only logical.

      Of course, and we do; to an extent. But, like many arguments, this is one of degree. Ideally, we'd adapt our time cosntantly so that the daylight hours were perfectly centred around midday, as defined by the highpoint of the sun in the sky. We don't do that, because it would be WAY too much work. So why don't we adapt our time, maybe, 8 times a year? Again, too much work. So, the argument is along the lines of: why do you (or did Ben Franklin) think that adjusting time once a year was the place to draw the line? I say a better place would be to pick a time for midday that sticks closest to (natural) midday around the year, and stick to that. Way less hassle.

    17. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by Geeky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I read somewhere that making street lights less bright actually helps to reduce crime. The logic was that very bright street lighting increases contrast between the areas nearest the lights and the gaps between them. This means that our eyes don't adjust to the darkness so well, and creates shadows in which the criminals can lurk.

      By reducing the brightness of the streetlights, our eyes are adjusted to the lower light levels and so we can see better into the unlit shadows; hence making it harder for the criminals to lurk unseen.

      Although this was borne out by a study (somewhere in Arizona? Can't find a link handy), Joe Public didn't understand and demanded their brighter lights back. The purpose of the study was to investigate ways to reduce energy use, but lower light pollution is an obvious side benefit.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    18. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      Rationales Against It:

      I live in the western end of a timezone in a northern latitude. The sun won't be rising here until 10 minutes before my kids have to leave for school and I have to head to work.

      Now, I'm not about to get ready in the cold, uncaffeinated dark. Instead, my furnace will now be kicking in at the absolute coldest part of the day, and every light in the house will be glaring. The only, ONLY difference between this and my summer routine is that I'll be spending more energy dollars in the morning than I would otherwise.

      Yay, DST - a dark drive to the office with absolutely nothing to show for it.

      To my neighbors to the north: I'm sorry about all this, really. Most of us realize this is a stupid idea, too, and we apologize for inflicting this on you.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    19. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by jthayden · · Score: 1

      I could be wrong, but what you are complaining about is Standard Time, not Daylight Saving Time. The time in winter is standard time, so you ought to be happy about Daylight Saving Time being extende since it makes it lighter in the morning during winter.

    20. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      The time in winter is standard time, so you ought to be happy about Daylight Saving Time being extende since it makes it lighter in the morning during winter.

      If you didn't have it exactly 100% backward, I'd probably agree with you. DST shifts the clock forward, so that when it would ordinarily be 7:00AM, my clock says 8:00AM.

      DST gives you darker mornings in exchange for lighter evenings. If your spot in the world has plenty of morning to spare, then it might be a good deal. My location doesn't have an extra morning light that I'm willing to part with, but we'll be losing it anyway.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    21. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by jim_redwagon · · Score: 1

      PLEASE STOP! You used LOGIC and RATIONALE to debunk an argument of the time change being "stupid". Next you'll want to show us actual numbers representing your views. Damn, I am too late.

      Peace /.ers, enjoy the sunlight.

      --
      I forgot what I wanted to say, but honestly, it was important.
    22. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by spun · · Score: 1

      You know, there are the same number of hours of sunlight in a day whether or not you are on daylight savings time. It's not like we have the power to slow down the earth's rotation for the summer.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    23. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by MarkGriz · · Score: 1
      By reducing the brightness of the streetlights, our eyes are adjusted to the lower light levels and so we can see better into the unlit shadows; hence making it harder for the criminals to lurk unseen.

      Although this was borne out by a study (somewhere in Arizona? Can't find a link handy), Joe Public didn't understand and demanded their brighter lights back.
      Indeed. These are the same people who think putting bright lights on the outside of their house and beaming them all over the neighborhood somehow improves security. You'd never be able to spot a burglar breaking in because you are blinded by their "security" lights.
      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    24. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      force me to re-learn how to use the interface every time something changes.

      You obviously didn't understand my post, you are precisely my point. People will whinge when things change even if it's for the better (that's the old skool fan boy bit). If you put up with changing menus for a month or so you'll find that they don't change any more and only display the things you use, but because change initially gives yo a head ache you never ride it out and will never benefit. Just like the people complaining that if they have to get to work for 8 they won't get enough sleep.

      -5 didn't get it.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    25. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Buy me a fancy new thermostat that will turn off my Floridian a/c during the times I'm not home and I might sign on. Oh, and check with my landlord to see if I'm allowed to replace the old one.

    26. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      I have a fancy old one, that has an "off switch". It's become second nature, right along with turning off the lights when I leave for work (I work nights), to switch off the A/C.

    27. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      True, but by shifting an hour ahead, you get home from work an extra hour before sunset. That's another hour of sweet freon-arctic goodness that's got Flicker, Pillage and Larceny[0] laughing all the way to the bank since some braindead politicians think that's less expensive than running an electric light for an hour.

      [0]publicly known as "FPL" or "Florida Power and Light"

    28. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by Dwonis · · Score: 1
      You obviously feel that Microsoft's design decisions are useful; Good for you. However, people other than those targeted by Microsoft's focus groups have to use Microsoft software.

      Allow me to list some of the problems I have with this particular interface feature:

      1. Once the options are stabilized, what happens if I let one of my friends use my computer while I'm away? I'm guessing that the interface will be both:
        • hard for my friend to use, and
        • will change in response to my friend's usage patterns, so that when I return, I will have to suffer for another month before it re-learns my usage patterns.
      2. What if my usage patterns tend to cause Windows to become unstable, so that I have to wipe the computer and reinstall Windows every few months. Do I have to suffer for a month each time I reinstall Windows?
      3. What happens when I upgrade to a new version of Office? Do I have to suffer for another month?
      4. It's hard to give someone instructions (tech support) over the phone when the interface changes itself around by default.
      5. What about users who learn to use computers by following step-by-step instructions? My experience is that this doesn't help them, because it's nearly impossible to give clear and precise instructions in the first place. Also, these people tend not to use the computer regularly enough for any training algorithm work reliably.
      6. I use a lot of different computers. My usage patterns don't follow me, so for n computers, I have to suffer n times the amount I have to suffer on one computer.

      Sure, having menus that adapt to a person's usage patterns is a nice idea, but (as is consistent with my experience) Microsoft has done a poor implementation of the idea. This feature, if implemented at all, should:

      • not be on by default,
      • allow learning and interface updates to be switched on and off separately, and
      • have support for importing and exporting interface profiles in some user-editable format

      "Old skool fanboys" have different usage patterns than you do. Get over it.

      <rant>I find it amazing that so many people repeat the wonderful statements that Microsoft's interfaces are easy to use, but when I actually watch them use them, I see everything but ease-of-use.</rant>

      Want an example of what I consider to be a good interface? Have a look at Vim, particularly, GVim (the GUI version of the program). Anyone who knows how to use Notepad can use GVim after learning one additional bit of information: If you don't see "-- INSERT --" at the bottom-left of the screen, press "i" (to switch to "Insert" mode) then just type whatever you want. The rest is obvious to a Notepad user: When you want to load, save, print, quit, or whatever, use the menus. Many advanced features are available by looking through the online help, or asking a friend, but once you learn how to do something in Vim, you know it, and you can practice it until you can do it your sleep, if you like.

      But I suppose I'm easily dismissed as an "old skool fanboy" who needs to 'get with the times' instead of using 'archaic text-based UNIX programs' (even though GUI Vim for Windows has been around for several years)... Whatever.

    29. Re:It's to save energy you insensitive clod! by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry that you fail to perceive yourself in a way that allows you to adapt and use potential benefits that are presented to you because you cling to the present and don't accept the future.

      1. Don't you have a guest login? II also expect that your PC is different enough to your friends (different version of windows, different version of office, differentiffer applications installer), I have very little problem using other people's PC, even windows ones and I've been using only Linux at home for years.

      it would be nice if Microsoft provided a way to export you personal settings so that you can take them with you.

      2. WFT? Unless there's a bug in the menuing system (the menu system is only a small part of the OS so it should be easy to fix any bugs in the first service pack) how is your usage pattern going to cause instability? Please I'd really like to know where your going with that one.

      3. I hope not, ref it would be nice to export your settings in #1. If you do have to suffer than that's Microsoft's fault for not implementing smooth upgrades not the fault of intelligent menus.

      4. So make it possible to turn the feature off and on, hey you could even have different profiles depending on the work your doing.

      5. Generally if you don't use a PC enough for the algorithm to work then your always going to be learning how to use it, I don't think intelligent menus are going to cause too much of a problem and you could always turn the feature off. But your problem implies that those people who do use a computer enough for the algorithm would benefit.

      6. See #1, and it is possible to share profiles over the network so that when you logon to another PC it's just like you like it (even down to the wallpaper), I think it may be possible to export your settings to a USB key and then import them when you use another PC. (It's been a while since I've used Windows, but under NT is seemed possible so I expect more recent version s of windows would be better)

      I think you've found quite a few exceptions to prove the rule, I didn't say that Microsoft's system couldn't be improved upon all I said is that if you give it the time (like you have to give anything new some time to learn) it will benefit you and not hinder you.

      Want an example of what I consider to be a good interface? Have a look at Vim.

      I use vim all the time, though I only new a few commands for years. About a year or so ago I thought it would be a good idea to learn a few more commands and went through vimtutor.
      It has some quirks (like having to escape ('s etc.. when searching because vim uses regexps to search etc...) that take a while to learn, but once you've learnt Vim it can be very usefull.

      Notepad can use GVim after learning one additional bit of information.

      Except when you paste with the mouse it has a horrible habit of double indenting everything unless you tell it your going to paste. (that's Vim maybe not GVim, I usually use VIM in the command line)

      If you want to see a really good editor look at textpad, it's simple, yet powerfull.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  35. Re:Great idea for here! Meet NDT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He can always blame it on Microsoft... er, I mean 'M$'

  36. Great by RomulusNR · · Score: 1

    So they'll also have to change it back when the stupid US version of the law gets pulled before its supposed to take effect.

    Damn near every DST-aware invention is going to be screwed when this happens for those four extra weeks.

    I think they should give us a three-week national holiday so that we don't have to deal with the chaos. Who's with me?

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'd have to be a three-week provincial holiday. I'm with you, though.

  37. Why not UTC? by vertinox · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would make things simple and just go by UTC. So when we mean we are going to have a meeting in New York at 15:00, we mean we are going to have a meeting in California at 15:00.

    You make the time different based on what you are and work around the time... No the other way around. I wake up at 13:00 and you can wake up at 18:00 whever you may be. It would save the trouble of having to talk with other people in other time zones and always manually adjust the time.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    1. Re:Why not UTC? by teslar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Going to UTC won't change a thing.
      I would go to work from 0900 to 1700, the guy in Germany from 1000 to 1800, the American from 0200 to 1000 or whatever. You haven't gotten rid of timezones at all, you've simply hidden them away in a more confusing system.

      As it is now, at least I know when I go to the States, that I'll be able to go shopping at 1500 hours, because that's the way it is in my country too and human life tends to follow similar patterns. In your system, if I try buying something at 1500 hours, I'll get a strange look from people and they'll say 'you're not from around here, are you?' So you've made it worse for me - not only am I jetlagged, I also have no ideas at what time I'm supposed to do what things - I'll simply be the laughing stock of the hotel employess when I demand my breakfast at 0800 hours.

      If I want to call someone in Calfiornia now, I'll have to check timezones to make sure I won't wake him up in the middle of the night. If I want to call someone in your system, I have to check at what time people go to bed and when they wake up over there to make sure of the same thing. So - it really is the same difference.

    2. Re:Why not UTC? by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      human life tends to follow similar patterns. In your system, if I try buying something at 1500 hours, I'll get a strange look from people and they'll say 'you're not from around here, are you?'

      I agree with your points, but that problem exists with the current system too.

      Most societies have differing shut down times. Heck, here in the United Kingdom most towns have differing "half closing" days where the stores generally close half way through the day. Most European countries have similar arrangements. It's also common practice to be able to drop into a French bakery at 6.30am, but in the UK a bakery may not open till 8.30, and so on.

    3. Re:Why not UTC? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      In your system, if I try buying something at 1500 hours, I'll get a strange look from people and they'll say 'you're not from around here, are you?' So you've made it worse for me - not only am I jetlagged, I also have no ideas at what time I'm supposed to do what things - I'll simply be the laughing stock of the hotel employess when I demand my breakfast at 0800 hours.

      Maybe I am too used to things always being available 24 hours... But from my perspective I don't travel, but I always communicate with people at other locations. Personally, I think things should run 24 hours like the stockmarket or liquor stores but perhaps the world is not ready for that.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    4. Re:Why not UTC? by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      But people aren't expected to run 24 hours individually. And like people have said, there are complications with an internationally aware system in both cases. So you have to pick your poison. People typically choose the existing standard where noon, 1200, represents approximately the time the sun is directly overhead. For most people, who only deal with their local area, this works quite well. If you have to do command and control of a military, or even business, that operates, literally, around the world, then you tend to use UTC. Both systems truly are necessary, and folks who have to, will, change between both at will.

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    5. Re:Why not UTC? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It would make things simple and just go by UTC.

      Besides the comments others have made... DST has a purpose, and switching to UTC would eliminate any possibility for implimenting DST. How would that be a good thing?
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:Why not UTC? by bergeron76 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because almost _everything_ as we know it would have to change.
      For example, how do you tell your employees to be at work at 8:00 UTC if some of them are in New York and others are in California?

      Here's how: Have some of them come to work at 8:00 UTC, and others at 11:00 UTC? That is called having Time Zones.

      Time Zones exist because of geography and physics. The Sun and Moon will be a specific places in certain geographic regions at certain, erhm, times. Benjamin Franklin was the one that proposed "Daylight Savings Time" as we now know it - in order to save Paris "Millions of Dollars"(century adjusted) in Candlewax use.

      Candles were used for lighting homes at night back then.

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    7. Re:Why not UTC? by realbadjuju · · Score: 2, Funny
      So when we mean we are going to have a meeting in New York at 15:00, we mean we are going to have a meeting in California at 15:00.

      How can we going to agree on what time the meeting is, when we don't know which side of the continent it's on? :)

    8. Re:Why not UTC? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yes, and they needed to save candlewax because instead of getting up when the sun comes up and going and doing the things that need to be done in daylight, people were getting up on the tick of the clock.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    9. Re:Why not UTC? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Uhm, no, that's a completely and utterly different 'problem'.

      And the fact that you've just referred to opening times using the timezone system is a good example of why it's good - everyone can understand what kind of times 6.30am, and 8.30am are.

    10. Re:Why not UTC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      in order to save Paris "Millions of Dollars"(century adjusted) in Candlewax use.

      Right, because simply adjusting our daily schedules is physically impossible. So instead of say, simply waking up an hour later and going to be an hour later, we change time itself. Brilliant.

      For all Ben Franklin contributed to the world, this one was not only pointless and arbitrary, but couterproductive.

    11. Re:Why not UTC? by sootman · · Score: 1

      It would make things simple and just go by UTC. So when we mean we are going to have a meeting in New York at 15:00, we mean we are going to have a meeting in California at 15:00.

      Dude, my clock doesn't even go to 15.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    12. Re:Why not UTC? by FreeUser · · Score: 1

      I share your digust with Daylight Savings Time, but the disgust shouldn't be aimed at those who invented it (Ben Franklin) or those who implimented it, it should be aimed at the whole morass of humanity that is so fucking inflexible we refuse to change our schedules (or, as another poster pointed out, our rediculous driving habits in 12mpg SUVs) and instead leave those who would like to increase energy savings no other choice but to change time itself.

      For all Ben Franklin contributed to the world, this one was not only pointless and arbitrary, but couterproductive.

      I don't agree. I think it is quite productive. It results in energy savings, despite peoples' inflexibility in their habits and their schedules. Now, we could institute a "you waste energy, you die" policy and breed for humans with a more flexible sense of schedule and better driving habits, but those of us who even dare suggest such methods of, ah, eugenics, tend to be labelled nazi-sympathisers, damn liberals, or somesuch. [/humor]

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    13. Re:Why not UTC? by Ichijo · · Score: 1

      >> Why not UTC?

      > Because almost _everything_ as we know it would have to change.

      It would be a one-time change. Compare that with DST, which makes us change our clocks twice a year, every year.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
  38. The other provinces probably won't be far behind by Hannah+E.+Davis · · Score: 1

    Bah, I have a hard enough time remembering the time difference between myself (in Vancouver) and my parents (in Ottawa) without the time difference changing due to some new kind of DST. However, realistically, if Ontario is doing it, most other provinces (with the possible exceptions of ones which want to appear "distinct") will probably follow suit... no matter how silly they think the whole thing is. If something is annoying for me, it'll probably be even worse for someone running a business.

  39. Call me when truck dispatching to China happens... by HBI · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please.

    When you can drive across the border, and time loads to arrive at particular locations at particular times, then time matters. The less weirdness, the better.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  40. It is amazing by LesPaul75 · · Score: 0

    ... that the government of this country takes time out of it's day to even think about things like this. The only message this sends is that the citizens of this country are idiots (according to the government). Either A) They believe that changing the clocks actually changes the number of daylight hours in each 24-hour rotation of the Earth, or B) They believe that everyone is too stupid to just set their clocks an hour earlier or later, as needed, without the government passing a law forcing everyone to do it. Moronic.

    1. Re:It is amazing by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, it makes it so people use less electricty in the evening. If you expect business to just start an hour early, you are the moron.

      It would disrupt WallStreet and global economics.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:It is amazing by RoboRay · · Score: 0

      Yes, and forces everyone to use MORE electricity in the MORNING. End result? Negligible benefit. The only good change to DST would be to eliminate it (or we all just get fed up and move to the places that are already DST-free.)

    3. Re:It is amazing by LesPaul75 · · Score: 1

      What would disrupt Wall Street and global economics? Doing away with DST? Or changing DST? Or not changing DST? I didn't argue for any of those things. I just said that the fact that our government cares at all about DST is amazing. Like I said, moving the clocks one way or the other has no effect on the number of light hours in a day. If that's not obvious, then you are the moron.

      It may have been true, back when DST was first introduced, that just about all businesses operated on a 8-5 work day, but that's hardly the case today. And there are many, many other arguments against DST. Here's a good starting point: http://www.standardtime.com/

  41. Re:auto shifting times by saskboy · · Score: 1

    I've seen plenty of devices that switch times when they should not. I should know, I'm in a place that doesn't change the time when DST rolls around, yet the devices change anyway. This includes radios, VCRs, and probably microwaves too [if they bothered to insert a DST rule for it.]

    I'm aware of VCRs that have the ability to get the time signal from the cable. I own one.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  42. I continue to maintain ... by constantnormal · · Score: 1

    ... that any place crazy enough to get on the DST bandwagon should go all the way and adopt year-round DST. If a little of it is a good thing, and more is better, then shouldn't we maximize that goodness and adopt DST 365 days a year?

    I mean, in the absence of any sort of hard data as to whether or not there actually is any beneficial impact to DST (and one would think, that after a century of bickering about it, someone would have collected some data to statistically demonstrate that DST does ANYTHING, but NOooo!), Why the Hell Not?

    The morons^H^H^H^H^H^HThoughtful Citizens who insist that this is such a Good Thing will be happy, and I won't have to change all my clocks multiple times a year. Software could be simplified and a ton of consumer electronics could have one less poorly-implemented configuration item for the consumer to screw up.

  43. I have already completed this entire thread by BOOTSTRAPS · · Score: 1, Funny

    I have finished this thread for you:

    >It's not broke, don't fix it. (Score: 5, Insightful)
    >>Yea but America controls it and I don't like America. (Score:4, Interesting)
    >The Government is controlling too much stuff (Score: 4, Interesting)
    >>We can just have some countries control it, then (Score: 5, Insightful)
    >>>Rules are made to be broken! (Score: 5, Funny)
    >>>>What time is it now? (Score 5, Interesting
    >>>>>At least they don't bomb people! (Score: 4, Funny)
    >>>>>>I hate Canadia. Ive never been there, but i hate it. (Score: -1, Troll)
    >>>>>>>Arrogant Americans. Just like all Americans. All Americans are ignorant and generalize. (Score: 1, Redundant)
    >I hate microsoft (Score: 1, Off-Topic)
    >Canadian Weed (Score: 3, Interesting)

    _29 replies_ below your current threshold

    --
    (\(\
    (^.^)
    (")")
    Saving sig aborted.
    Reason: Your subject looks too much like ascii art
  44. People REALLY don't understand the trade issues by gorim · · Score: 1

    I have read all of the comments here and virtually all people are not understanding the issue here. As is stated in the article, Ontario did this for *economic* reasons.

    Ontario is US' largest trading partner in the entire world, and the vast bulk of that trade is with the eastern timezone states of the US. There are vast economic reasons for them to keep to the same daylight schedule as the US.

    There are literally no other reasons to do this, and if the reason was anything else, those complaining would have a point. But given the economic issues at stake, with full consideration, I can't see how anyone can argue against this move by Ontario.

    1. Re:People REALLY don't understand the trade issues by adrianmonk · · Score: 1
      Ontario is US' largest trading partner in the entire world, and the vast bulk of that trade is with the eastern timezone states of the US. There are vast economic reasons for them to keep to the same daylight schedule as the US.

      You don't have to adopt the same daylight saving time conventions as another area in order to trade with it. If your clock reads one hour different from someone you really wish to trade with, simply shift your business's hours of operation by an hour in whatever direction is necessary to match up with them. It's not as if there are laws saying you must open or close your business at a particular time. If a private business has an economic reason to open or close at a particular time, then by all means, they should go ahead and change their schedule.

      And if the government wants to encourage people to do that, why not do a public education campaign that would help businesses trade people improve their abilities to trade not just with people in the corresponding time zone across the border but other foreign trading partners as well?

  45. Onratio first? Québec too... by plsavaria · · Score: 1

    Just to say that Ontario isn't the first province that will match US DST time. Québec will to, announced last week.
    http://www.cyberpresse.ca/actualites/article/artic le_complet.php?path=/actualites/article/16/1,63,0, 102005,1193040.php

    --
    The answer IS 42.
  46. It's a Great Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I think that DST is really good. Let's all do it all year round!

  47. A radical solution to save daylight! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Instead of, you know, redefining time itself so that you'll be able to wake up an hour earlier or later, why not... and the apparent simplicity is the sheer genius of my idea... just wake up an hour later, and leave the clocks the hell alone!. You know... like, go to work an hour later, go home an hour later, do everything the same, but an hour later!!! Totally radical, I know!!!

    It's a tricky concept, but the public can figure out how to readjust time itself twice a year, they might just be grown up enough to handle getting up when the sun's up. Those bastions of progress and ingenuity, farmers and other backwater hicks, have been adjusting their sleep schedule to match the sunrise since, oh, the dawn of time.... but we're not smart enough to keep up with those slack jawed geniuses, right?!?

    Nah... way too radical!!! ... much better to screw with time itself, right? That would never cause anyone hassles, like when an hour of time is just missing from the middle of the logfiles, and you have to teach your new manager every single freaking year where the "missing time" went... but I'm not bitter... really, I'm not...

    This is gonna cost Canada *and* the US a tonne of money, because businesses now legally have to screw around with all their clocks for no good reason. Who really cares!!! If Ontario really need to do business with US trading partners during the very first hour of the day, we can certainly get up an "earlier" or "later" to do it. If we can schedule late night conference calls to accomodate clients in California, we can afford to be an hour out of synch with Michigan, too.


    But then we "won't be the same" as the US, and we'll magically "lose business"... somehow... because the business between two major trading partners is somehow going to go up in smoke!!! They'll both get disgrunted with each other and go off in a huff and even start trading with some other developed country ... that shares a common border... within a one hour time zone distance... of Ontario... like... umm... no where else in the world?!?

    Stupid DST. Stupid Canadian government. Stupid US government! Bad politicans! No biscuit!!!

  48. Kinda worrying... by sanx · · Score: 1
    Am I the only person who's kinda concerned about the statement in the In Depth: Daylight Saving Time section linked from TFA, that reads:

    Some parts of Australia have adopted daylight time. Of course, it's done a little differently than in the Northern Hemisphere where seasons are opposite. So, when daylight time starts in Canada, it comes to an end in Australia and vice versa. When Canadians are waxing their skis in December, Australians are waxing their surfboards because it's summer there. (Emphasis mine)

    Are there actually people who don't know that it's summer in the southern hemisphere when it's winter in the northern? Although I do know that you north americans have some stunningly thick people (+1 Insightful, -1 Troll), it beggars belief that this is sufficiently unknown to warrant comment.

    1. Re:Kinda worrying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I think we still have people who don't know there is a southern hemishpere, and another set who wonder why everything doesn't fall off of the "bottom of the earth".

  49. 49 Hour Weekend WOOT! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    I think we should set the clocks back 1 hour every Saturady night for a longer weekend and more time to party!!!

  50. Slashdot: Group blog. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course. But remember Slashdot basically is a group blog. Were we come on here and rant and rave, and occasionally praise. But it's NOT a forum for education about economics, law, business, government, or even human nature. The day that it does, is the day it ceases to be Slashdot.

    1. Re:Slashdot: Group blog. by gorim · · Score: 1

      My God, the most insightful comment I have read in months! :)

  51. I think your wrong by geekoid · · Score: 1

    the singer "Bono" is very active in global politics
    "Bono" is from across the pond. Much closer to the EU then Sonny Bono, or Chasity.
    "Bono" was nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize
    "Bono" is one of the foremost experts in hunger policy, Accross the globe.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  52. Completely untrue.. Quebec was first by Tester · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is funny... Because a few days ago Quebec announced that it had decided to follow the US and that the gov of Qc was trying to convince Ontario and New Brunswick (that are also in EST). Radio-canada reported it (in French)

    1. Re:Completely untrue.. Quebec was first by linuxbert · · Score: 2

      Ontario is Eastern. New Brunswick is one hour ahead - in the Atlantic Time zone.

  53. Re:Great idea for here! Meet NDT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why won't you just die already?

  54. And if the United States by Mynn · · Score: 1

    were to jump off a cliff, would Toronto do it, too?

    --

    Face it, people are stupid, and the internet is the place where they all meet.
  55. Excellent by BeerMilkshake · · Score: 3, Interesting
    With Ontario making the announcement, other provinces will follow, including the one I live in.

    Why is this great news? Because of all the software maintenance effort that will be required to upgrade the systems to comply. The additional workload will mean more money and maybe even a recovery in the job market after the tech bubble a few years back.

    This is the one thing GWB has done that will benefit me. Thanks George!

    1. Re:Excellent by Chirs · · Score: 1

      "With Ontario making the announcement, other provinces will follow, including the one I live in."

      I live in Saskatchewan. We don't do DST at all, so I'm fairly sure we won't be following Ontario...

  56. I hate DST by Psx29 · · Score: 1

    It messes up my sleeping every year, and my birthday falls right on it sometimes what a great gift...usually takes me a few weeks to adjust at worst or 1 week at best. I hate changing my damn 15000 million clocks everytime its DST !!! WTF IS THIS BULLSHIT WHY TORTURE US LIKE THIS? pick a time and stick with it. My body will always want to wake up when the sun comes up no matter what. Damn you bastards.

    1. Re:I hate DST by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      It's contemporary Darwinism in action, and you're losing.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  57. Why? by azakem · · Score: 1

    The last time I checked, both the US and Canada had a pretty firm grasp upon the concept of electric lighting. Why are we still messing around with this daylight savings time hooplah?

  58. Re:auto shifting times by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    also some care is needed with computer setups and in places where theese things are done by hand its rarely done right.

    generally your computer works in either local time (windows) or UTC (unix) and converts to the other one as needed. The problems start when a user sets things up such that local time is shown right but the time bias is wrong so the computers idea of UTC is wrong.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  59. I hate DST by kbahey · · Score: 1

    If I were to have my way, DST should be in winter not summer, so when I am going home, the sun is still up, and it is not dark.

    Failing that, let us unify time across the whole world. UTC would be the time everywhere, anywhere, any time of the year. It would be hard when setting up appointments and such, but we are in a mess anyway.

    I have to use a tool like Time And Date to know what time it is in a city I am calling.

    As someone living in Ontario, this is yet another fine mess we got ourselves in, in the name of trade and economy.

    As others have pointed out, we do trade with China and Europe and they are not on the same zone we are in.

  60. 51 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fine - so ontario is the 51st state and not canada - were allowed to be partly wrong every once in a while

  61. Problems with re-scheduling DST by sasha328 · · Score: 1

    I'll give you a worse scenario than VCRs. In sydney during the Olympics, daylight savigs was started a month or so earlier than usual (sugust rather than October).
    MS issued a "patch" for for Windows to "create a new timezone". You would not believe how many problems this caused in the corporate world (using outlook calendars). It was a problem in some companies for years afterwards. The problem arose when one company applied the patch, but another didn't and the appointments were off by an hour and people missed important meetings. People who have thought this through, actually decided not to apply the patch "and told their employees to manually move their appointments during the extra DST period". These were the companies that didn't have problems.
    So, to answer another question about why 2007 for the implementation date: well it gives people time to prepare for situations like this!

  62. It's really because by Bullfish · · Score: 1

    It's really because we don't want to screw up the TV schedules and miss our favourite shows.

    1. Re:It's really because by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont understand.
      cant you just watch your tv programs whenever you want?
      are you in a third world country or something without dvrs?

  63. Nice move Bush.... Idiot! by Fuzzball963 · · Score: 1

    Just curious here but since you mentioned the Weights and Measures clause, any more initiatives for finally switching over to the metric system? I mean if we're changing time around why not the measurements as well. I bet if they did it the only people that would have trouble with it would be the people that hadn't been taught it in school or havent heard of it (a very small number I'm sure). I'd like to see it start gradually, say by putting the road signage in kilometers and miles both. That way we can all dip our toes in the water gradually :).

    --
    "The boy is dangerous, they all sense it, why can't you?"
  64. DST is moronic by ocelotbob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, the easy, cheap answer is to just encourage people to work different hours, with things like tax credits, etc. Save a lot of money, save a lot of fuel, everybody wins. Changing your clock is just silly.

    --

    Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

  65. Why DST? by Barkley44 · · Score: 1

    With this, now we have what, only 3 months now NOT in DST - why not just move our timezone to -4 instead of -5 all the time? Why even have DST? From a programming prospective, it sure would make it easier on me. Of course, if no other province is dumb like us, then it's just another joy of adding in code to handle DST for a specific province. Nice...

    --
    KeepTrackOfIt.com - Find the lowest gas prices in your area graphically
  66. Understanding Daylight Savings Time by ergo98 · · Score: 1

    This seems to be a typical Canada/US relation.

    It is remarkable that we deal with organizations throughout the world from Ontario, but it's so very important that we match the US for 3 weeks of the year. Of course we'll only match one timezone, and actually by ignoring this DST extension we could have benefitted from matching another timezone (CDT) for those weeks. We could have called it "MidWest Monster Mash!"

    Anyways, many people don't even understand how DST affects them, or what this change will mean. Wouldn't you know it - I put up an entry explaining it!

  67. largest trading partner to each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Last time I checked, both Canada and the US did trade with countries other than each other. Some of these are in other time zones.

    80% of Canada's exports go to the US; 25% of the US' exports go to Canada. Each country is the others' largest trading partner. 40% of Canada's population is in Ontario. The next largest province is Quebec, which is also in the Eastern timezone. The largest city is Toronto (in Ontario), the next largest is Montreal (in Quebec). Toronto and Montreal are two of Canada's busiest airports (Vancouver is in the top three as well I believe).

    Anyway you cut it Canada and the US are interconnected economically. Anything that messes up the interaction can have serious repercussions.

  68. DST Graph For Toronto, Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's linked in another thread, hidden deep in conversation, and I though it worthwhile, so here's a graph of DST in Toronto, Canada. One of the few informative things I've read in this.

  69. It's British California not by baomike · · Score: 1

    >

    1. Re:It's British California not by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      And it's on the left coast.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  70. haha - USA owns Canada... again. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF, why don't they just become the 51st state. All of it except the smelly french part.

  71. Try Humptulips by baomike · · Score: 1

    Clue; it's in W Washington. (upper left hand corner of the map).

  72. I hope so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in Vancouver. Toronto has thought of themselves as the centre of the universe for longer than George Bush has. We'd very much like to see Toronto jump off a cliff, with or without the United States. :)

    1. Re:I hope so by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Seconded from Alberta. :-)

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  73. CBC is wrong like usual by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Québec was the first one but since CBC has no clue what happens outside of Toronto that is no surprise that they haven't
    heard yet. Québec has made the decision as soon at Washington decided to make the change.New York being one of Québec's largest trading partner they have little choice.

    This is a business decision much like the one that Indiana made this year to join the daylight saving time scheme. The decision in Indiana wasn't made because it was popular but to please business. Close to 75% of the population didn't want to make the change but it was on the platform of the republican party who took power. They knew that the population didn't want it but didn't give a rat's ass because the voters were not the important factor to the election of the new governor.

    Without big money from corporations who wanted the swith this prick would never have gotten elected governor. You have to remember that he's the same asshole who refused to fund the levies in New Orleans when he was working for the nutcase GW at the White House.

  74. +5 +5 +5 +5 Best Post Here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There isn't even any Adsense or ads there. Very cool.

    Thnx

  75. Re:VCR time by saskboy · · Score: 1

    My family has owned at least one, it was Sanyo I think, although it might have been RCA. It wasn't a generic Walmart model, and this was about 4 years ago.

        The option is to turn the feature on [which is now broken in some parts of North America], or off.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  76. legislating physics by Tipa · · Score: 1

    We should just legislate that cares take NO fuel - that would save even more!

  77. Southern viewpoint? by baomike · · Score: 1

    I can see a savings in the south, but up north it means you get a hour more of dark in the morning. I am either going to have an hour of dark in the AM or the PM. I happen to prefer getting up after the sun.

  78. Stop messing with it by CurbyKirby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While you're at it, have it last year-round. Not like it hasn't been done before:

    The last time the United States and Canada observed different winter time systems was during the 1974-75 oil crisis. The U.S. did not turn its clocks back at all that fall in an attempt to conserve energy.

    From http://www.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/07/28/ daylight050728.html?print

    Better to have to change once and get it over with than replay the same drama every decade when someone wants to avoid problems like having hundreds of thousands of people driving huge vans and SUVs to work with no passengers. By the way, why is gas so much more expensive in other countries when we seem to waste it? From time to time I hear about equivalent prices of over $10/gallon.

    --

    --
    "Extra Anus Kills Four-Legged Chick" -- Headline
    1. Re:Stop messing with it by sita · · Score: 1

      While you're at it, have it last year-round. Not like it hasn't been done before:

      The last time the United States and Canada observed different winter time systems was during the 1974-75 oil crisis. The U.S. did not turn its clocks back at all that fall in an attempt to conserve energy.


      And that is not a first either. Ever wondered why France is in a different timezone? They didn't change back after the war.

    2. Re:Stop messing with it by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      By the way, why is gas so much more expensive in other countries when we seem to waste it?

      Taxes.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    3. Re:Stop messing with it by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      By the way, why is gas so much more expensive in other countries when we seem to waste it?

      Volume discount. We are a good customer.

    4. Re:Stop messing with it by evilWurst · · Score: 1

      "By the way, why is gas so much more expensive in other countries when we seem to waste it? From time to time I hear about equivalent prices of over $10/gallon."

      Taxes.

      No, really. When you hear about the global crude oil price going up or down, that's the price *everyone* who imports pays. However, most European countries put a high tax on gasoline. Some use it for road repair and others use it for different social programs, whereas in the US things tend to be paid out of the general state or federal budgets. I've also heard there are a lot of high road tolls in parts of the EU.

      (The US federal gas tax is about 18 cents/gallon. State gas taxes can be as high as about 30 cents/gallon; some apply a sales tax to it on top of that, others don't.)

      (A little googling shows the UK gas tax in 2000 came out to about $3.40/gallon. Yep. The tax alone was more than twice what the final price was in the US at the time.)

  79. A Plains Indian word... by pollux_polex · · Score: 1

    Saskatchewan: "From the Plains Indian word, "kisiskatchewan", meaning "the river that flows swiftly"; a reference to the area's major river."

    1. Re:A Plains Indian word... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Two major rivers. North Saskatchewan, and South Saskatchewan. Oddly enough, the capital doesn't have a river at all.

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
    2. Re:A Plains Indian word... by Kuad · · Score: 1

      Well, you wouldn't want the Pirates of the Saskatchewan to show up on the Premier's doorstep, would you?

      ...farmers bar your doors, when you see the Jolly Roger on Regina's mighty shores.
      The Arrogant Worms -- The Last Saskatchewan Pirate

    3. Re:A Plains Indian word... by dadragon · · Score: 1

      Well, you wouldn't want the Pirates of the Saskatchewan to show up on the Premier's doorstep, would you?

      Sometimes I would ;)

      --
      God save our Queen, and Heaven bless The Maple Leaf Forever!
  80. Development of timezones by koick · · Score: 1

    On November 18, 1883, four standard time zones for the continental U.S.A. were introduced at the instigation of the railroads. When people began traveling by train, sometimes hundreds of miles in a day, the calculation of time became a serious problem. Operators of the new railroad lines realized that a new time plan was needed in order to offer a uniform train schedule for departures and arrivals.

    Since every city was using a different time standard, there were over 300 local sun times to choose from. The railroad managers tried to address the problem by establishing 100 railroad time zones, but this was only a partial solution to the problem.

    ref: LOC: Today in History

  81. Canada's a Country!?!?!?!?! by Dutchmang · · Score: 0

    Wow, and I thought it was just an irrelevant state... Like Idaho or Arkansas.

    --
    I'm looking over the wall, and they're looking at me!
    1. Re:Canada's a Country!?!?!?!?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not completely off, just need to match up properly

      $Idaho =~ m/PEI/;
      $Arkansas =~ m/Saskatchewan/;

  82. More benefits by ozTravman · · Score: 1

    Ontario should "benefit" more form the daylight savings change. The further you are form the equator the more daylight savings helps.

    1. Re:More benefits by ve3oat · · Score: 1

      Not really. If you are far enough north that the amount of daylight is less than about 7 or 8 hours per day, then DST doesn't make any difference any more. Any gain of daylight early in the day is equally lost later in the day. And north of the Arctic Circle DST is totally irrelevant.

    2. Re:More benefits by ozTravman · · Score: 1

      Its the act of shifting an hour of daylight from 5am to 7pm that makes the day seem longer.

  83. Trading by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 1

    Canada and the US aren't just each other's biggest trading partners, they are THE biggest trading partners. Our economies are inseperably intertwined. There really aren't any two nations on earth with a closer relationship, despite our rather interesting political and social differences.

  84. Hear, hear! by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

    You deserve to be modded up. Sadly, you probably won't be, because you're not slagging the U.S., Microsoft, or SCO...

    Anyway, I digress. I just thought you made a good point. People love to invent grand conspiracy theories, especially when they can feature The Man forcing All Those Little People to change their clocks back from DST a month later. It's oppression! It's cultural genocide! It's an obvious plot by Halliburton to ... do something! Evil!

    I think the tinfoil has gone to their heads.

    For the record, I think Daylight Saving Time (no 'S' on saving, by the way) is a pretty slick idea, and a good manipulation of the fact that time is inherently arbitrary anyway. So why not make it work for us, or at least a little bit in our advantage, if we can? Seems like a no-brainer to me.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Hear, hear! by chmod+u+s · · Score: 1

      For once the tinfoil hats have it. This is a total and complete bullshit made-up problem that serves only to create work. *IF* you believe the estimates that the equvalent of 10000 barrels of oil a day will be saved, that is ~30 days * 10000 * ~$60 =$180 million a year saved. Whoopdee-f**king-doo! It is going to cost far, FAR more than that to retool every daylight savings time algorithm, device, clock, calendar, etc. American Airlines alone will have to foot a bill of that magnitude to update, test and deploy their software. And now we all have a y2k style annoyance with our machines.

      DST is NOT as simple as changing your clock; for example: Go outside. Look at the power meter on the side of your dwelling/office building. There is a recorder there. It may or may not adjust for the existing DST. It may or may not be read by a human. It may or may not dial in and send your data directly. You may or may not be able to choose your own retail electric provider to service your meter. Your meter reading entity may or may not be the same as your transmission and distribution service provider. Your power generation company might be any of a number.

      My point is ALL of these folks now have to change their code, their processes, their accounting, everything. And it all needs to happen by the same day in 2007. This is the insight I have because of my day gig, I am sure there are thousands of other problems as bad or worse that are created by this idiotic timeshifting crap.

      Timezones, daylight savings, local time - all bullshit that is supposed to simplify our lives that *really* only complicates it. Designed in a day that had no ramifications other than "oops, time to reset my watch".

      WAKE UP EARLIER, GO TO BED EARLIER. I have read all the hoopla about how DST saves energy. It doesn't. What does save energy is people doing things earlier and quitting things earlier. /rant

    2. Re:Hear, hear! by letxa2000 · · Score: 1
      I have read all the hoopla about how DST saves energy. It doesn't. What does save energy is people doing things earlier and quitting things earlier.

      I couldn't care less if it saves energy. I'd just like more daylight at the end of the day. Oh, and I for one am not particularly fond of getting up early. :)

  85. Daylight saving time is in the summer by p3d0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Daylight saving time has no bearing on what time the sun rises or sets in the winter.

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    1. Re:Daylight saving time is in the summer by boarder · · Score: 1

      That is absolutely true, but I don't notice it in the summer. I guess I should've been more specific and said I wish we had DST all year, so that in the winter with DST the sun would be out at a later time.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
  86. You'd still need to do that by p3d0 · · Score: 1
    Failing that, let us unify time across the whole world. UTC would be the time everywhere, anywhere, any time of the year. It would be hard when setting up appointments and such, but we are in a mess anyway.

    I have to use a tool like Time And Date to know what time it is in a city I am calling.

    You'd still need to do that. The only difference is, instead of saying "2pm in Toronto is 11am in Vancouver" it would say "the work day in Vancouver starts at 3pm and ends at 11pm".

    I think it's less confusing right now. If I say "it's 11am in Vancouver" then you know the sun's up, and people are about an hour from lunchtime. How do you get the same information when everyone uses UTC?

    --
    Patrick Doyle
    I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
  87. Re:The other provinces probably won't be far behin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (with the possible exceptions of ones which want to appear "distinct")

    What do you not like about Saskatchewan ???

  88. Bring me back night sky! by YGingras · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The summer night is already so short. By artificially moving sun set later you have to be pretty damn motivated if you want to look at the stars. But looking at the stars is something free, something that doesn't require energy and something that anyone will enjoy if they have an opportunity to see them. Instead, we only see the sun in the evening. So every one just sit inside, with the lights on, just because they see better that way, event if the sun is still high and they watch TV because they have nothing better to do.

    Wanna save energy? Why don't you shutdown or at least dim all those fscking lamp posts after the rush hour? Do we really need to light up the streets so bright that at in any large enough city (and you know its not that large) the night sky looks like dawn all night long. Just try it, stop reading /. and go outside. Mars is in opposition and we are in the peak of the Orionids meteor shower. There is quite a show going on and its not too cold yet to stay hours laying on the ground.

    1. Re:Bring me back night sky! by Zebidiah · · Score: 1
      This is something that I have been thinking a lot about lately and it really is pissing me off for some reason. I think the last time I saw the night sky in all its glory was about 20 years ago. I remember as a kid (I'm 41 now) my mother taking me home after visiting my grandmother and looking up at the night sky in complete awe. I was walking along the street looking upwards not where I was going. A most amazing sight.

      My modest ambition before I die is to see the night sky at least once more.

    2. Re:Bring me back night sky! by Alioth · · Score: 1

      You can't actually dim the typical streetlight lamps - they are usually high or low pressure sodium lights (low pressure sodium lights being the most energy efficient lamps ever made - however, most places replace the orange low pressure lights for light pink high pressure sodium lamps for a number of reasons). A dimmable type of lamp would actually be a lot less efficent - it'd have to be a tungsten filament lamp which is just about the least efficient type of lamp that we have.

      A better plan is to turn off the streetlights altogether in some areas, and switch off every other streetlight in other areas where lighting is needed all night. That's what we do where I live. Also, be proactive in fixing the lights that stay stuck on continuously (I think our streetlights here are switched by both a timer and the ambient light, so if the ambient light sensor fails, the light won't stay stuck on because the timer will switch it off). Last time I was in the UK, travelling on one of the motorways, it seemed like at least 10% of the street lights were stuck permanently on.

    3. Re:Bring me back night sky! by endlessoul · · Score: 1

      Mars is in opposition and we are in the peak of the Orionids meteor shower. There is quite a show going on and its not too cold yet to stay hours laying on the ground.

      Says you. It is getting chilly here (Central New York) at night. If I were to stay out with a jacket, I would be freezing in about an hour.

      Although, Mars captivates me whenever I gaze at the sky.

    4. Re:Bring me back night sky! by YGingras · · Score: 1
      It is getting chilly here (Central New York) at night. If I were to stay out with a jacket, I would be freezing in about an hour.

      I live in Montréal and I'm pretty sure the night is colder here than it is in New York. Yes, soon it will be too cold and I wear gloves so I can hold binoculars without freezing. But until it gets below -10C at night you can easily lay without freezing for at least an hour (about 20 meteors if you go out tonight) so stop looking for excuses and enjoy the universe in all its glory at least once.

  89. Provincial borders? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Ummm, like if you drove over a province or two and swapped 1-2 timezones. Because goodness knows nobody goes between provinces but everyone goes to the US...

    1. Re:Provincial borders? by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      If you drive across timezones, the time difference is the same no matter when you're doing it. Even in Arizona and parts of Indiana where DST is not observed, you know that the time difference will be the same during the whole summer and during the whole winter.

      However, if the US changes when DST takes effect by a couple of weeks, things start to get confusing. Why should people crossing between New York and Ontario need to figure out if the time is exatly the same like it is 48 weeks out of the year, or whether it just got either one hour earlier or later during the other 4 weeks?

      The US making a unilateral change is dumb and confusing. For Canada not to follow it would be just as dumb.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  90. Economics aside, the two are not the same by buddy+g · · Score: 1

    Although I see the sense in matching time zones between jurisdictions engaged in significant mutual trade, following the United States with respect to daylight savings time is not that obvious. As you venture farther North, the seasonal variation in day length increases. If the rationale for DST is to align the populace's waking day with the sun, at a certain latitude you are bound to fall short. At some point, you will have to travel to and from work in the dark. What makes sense for Florida may not translate to Northern Ontario or Québec City.

  91. The comment wasn't too bright either... by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
    Last time I checked, both Canada and the US did trade with countries other than each other.

    Canada does about 80% or more of its trade with the U.S. (which does about 25% of its trade with Canada). The largest share of that is from Ontario. I don't blame them one bit for trying to keep in sync' and believe it is in their best self interest. Economically, Canada relies much more on America than America relies on Canada.

    If Canada doesn't want to rely as much on America, then it should develop more trading partners... but the U.S. will always be the major trading partner just due to its proximity. Another thing Canada could do is like what they do in Quebec and Israel: pay people a bunch of money whenever they have kids. That would help encourage Canadians to increase the population. With more people would come more economic leverage as they would be able to create a larger economic output.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  92. Lets go one better... by sdnoob · · Score: 1

    the two most populated nations, china and india, each have a single time zone across their entire country. no dst, no time changes, period... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_zone#Trivia

    so what if pakistan/china border has a 3:30 time difference.. that's less relevent here because there's nothing but water on both sides.

    makes sense to me....

    a single time zone, with no dst, for the entire "lower 48" and (at least) the southern canadian provinces. base it on "high noon" on the summer solstice somewhere smack in the middle.. and for a lack of a better point of reference.. how about using TIME, ILLINOIS?!? at the junction of north, south, east, and west streets. http://tinyurl.com/dcra3

    if eastern canada still wants to be screwed up, they can join puerto rico and be +2 hours. alaska and hawaii should be on the same time anyway, they're approximately the same longitude.. make them -2 hours.

    definately simplify travel.. no more "2 hour" flights from toronto to vancouver and "7 hour" flights on the way back.

  93. People love DST by weighn · · Score: 1
    I hope that a lot of people come out very vocally to demonstrate what a stupid idea this is

    People generally love these ideas.

    The state government in Queensland (Australia) has an online petition on the subject of daylight savings. It has been running for about a week, and already has more than 3 times as many signatures as any other e-petition they have ever run. Despite sitting on the tropic of Capricorn, Queenslanders want DST. Stupid, but thats how it is.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
    1. Re:People love DST by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      "Despite sitting on the tropic of Capricorn, Queenslanders want DST. Stupid, but thats how it is."

      Queensland is still physically attatched to the rest of Australia and still does a great deal of overland trade with states south. It's similar to how Mexico observes DST (but not Sonora because they border Arizona) but Hawaii doesn't.

  94. don't remind me of Arizona by GunFodder · · Score: 1

    Arizona has a lot of gall just ignoring DST; same for those counties in Indiana. I wrote scheduling software at my last job, and it was a real pain trying to keep everyone happy when it came to time. One of the first quirks I learned was Arizona. Did you know Australia extended DST for a week by government decree when they last hosted the Olympics? Try accounting for that in software. Our corporate datebook software had very primitive timezone support. We used Java for our actual application, and the timezone code was a work in progress. We did end up changing some of our code to just use the timezone of the location being scheduled because our infrastructure wasn't reliable enough to handle more sophisticated logic.

    1. Re:don't remind me of Arizona by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Arizona has a lot of gall just ignoring DST; same for those counties in Indiana.

      Actually, I have yet to hear a good reason for going on DST, except that "everyone else does it". In fact, if you want to talk gall, talk to the US Government. When the reailroads created timezones, they had Indiana on Central. When the US government took that over, they put the line between Eastern and Central down Pennsylvannia Street in Indianapolis. That's three blocks from the exact middle of the state.

      Brilliant! [CLINKS GUINNESS GLASS]

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    2. Re:don't remind me of Arizona by NutscrapeSucks · · Score: 1

      "Everyone does it" is probably good enough reason. (I myself would support year around daylight time.)

      California has their flat earth ideas as well -- the state rejected posting exit numbers on the highways. Now they are doing it (in a haphazard manner), largely because it's expected by out-of-state travellers and not because californians need exit numbers to get around.

      --
      Whenever I hear the word 'Innovation', I reach for my pistol.
  95. Assawoman Bay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget Assawoman bay in Maryland!

  96. Standard vs Daylight Savings Time? by duncf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone else find it a bit unusual that "Standard Time" will now only be observed for 3 months of the year, while "Daylight Savings Time" will be observed for 9 months?

    Maybe they should change the names, so we have "Standard Time" in the summer... and "Night Savings Time" in the winter?

  97. great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think this is a great idea. The US and Canada have a long history of cooperation. We speak the same language and use similar money. We share many cultural values. Why not share time zones as well? This is yet another demonstration that Canada is America's bitch.

  98. Ontario Economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A massive chunk of the Ontario economy is synchronized down to the minute with the U.S. economy due to so-called "just in time production" in the automotive industry. Quite a few posters here seem to have no clue about this at all but the Ontario government is well aware of what drives its economy. So this change makes perfect sense to me.

  99. China had a better idea.. by musakko · · Score: 1

    China is about the same width as the US and the whole country is one time-zone! I feel sorry for those people way out in the western provinces..

    1. Re:China had a better idea.. by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      One time zone! Unless the government dictates when people sleep, they must have fun keeping track of when the people at the other end of China are in the office!

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  100. It doesn't save energy you insensitive clod! by achurch · · Score: 1

    Theoretically, the amount of residential electricity needed in the evening hours is dependent both on when the sun sets and when people go to bed. Because people tend to observe the same bedtime year-round, by artificially moving sunset one hour later, the amount of energy used is theoretically reduced.

    Theoretically, there's no difference between theory and practice. In practice . . . well, you know the rest.

    As a demonstration: How many of you have the air conditioner on while you're at home in the summer? (raises hand)

    When the U.S. went on extended DST in 1974 and 1975 in response to the 1973 energy crisis, Department of Transportation studies found that observing DST in March and April saved 10,000 barrels of oil a day

    And how many buildings had air conditioning in 1974 and 1975, or used it all the time even if they did? Far fewer than have it now, I'm willing to bet.

    1. Re:It doesn't save energy you insensitive clod! by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And anyway, ten thousand?! Ten measly fscking thousand? Take a look at this, even Canada uses 1.7 MILLION barrels a day. For some reason the US isn't on there, but I bet it uses significantly more. 10,000 a day is chickenfeed. Is that worth the hassle and lost productivity in the economy that DST causes?

  101. This is really stupid (reprise) by mark-t · · Score: 1
    The so called "economic impact" of being out of sync with the US for a mere 3 weeks out of each year is just a drop in the bucket compared to the economic impact it will have of trying to actually successfully implement this sort of change in every industry in the province. At least with y2k we had more than just a couple of years' warning, and quite frankly this sort of change very easily has the potential to cause problems of a not entirely disimilar in nature (although certainly not as large in scope, unless the problem is ignored until it is too late to fix everywhere it is needed).

    I predict that this change will do more harm than good in the short term - in both countries - and long before the time the proposed changes might have started to turn around economically (in terms of the so-called oil or energy savings, which one should realize won't be anywhere even close to the projected estimates because in actuality our society is far more functional around the clock now than it was when the study that predicted the energy savings was done), everyone will be so fed up with all the hassles that they've put up with so far, they will probably just drop the whole thing (probably with some sort of "oops... well that idea didn't work out very well, did it?" sort of excuse by the corresponding governments) and go back to the way things were before (that is, how they are right now).

  102. What do you call the 51st state? by Aaron+England · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Canada.

  103. Re:Call me when truck dispatching to China happens by Cyberdramon · · Score: 1

    Honestly, it's worse to dispatch trucks in America. What with half of some states observing DST and all... It's very difficult to have a driver say "I can deliver by 2200" and they're talking EST which is actually CDT and the customer is in EDT. So they get their stuff at 2300 instead. How do you tell your customer "Oh, I'm sorry. We forgot that Indiana is in a temporal flux." I think the whole hullaballo over saving 1% of our energy costs is negligible to the amount of time, effort and energy needed to compensate for for time zone variances. While I think the whole time zone system could use some serious work, for now it seems effective to have time only changed for regional purposes and not seasonal purposes. Essentially, stop the whole idiocy of springing forward and falling back. The time should be constant year round world wide.

  104. Capital Markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It may not make sense for every province to adopt the new US time, but from a capital markets perspective it is imperative. The North American financial markets generally operate on EST, and it makes sense for the TSX to open with the NYSE and NASDAQ so that interlisteds aren't an hour adrift. If you had that kind of drift, you could see capital flow from one market to another as traders try to get a jump on the day by hitting the earlier market place. These sorts of imbalances (and I'm sure there are more in other industries) are the kinds of things that would be easily avoided by continuing to share a common time.

    I know there are plenty of North American equities that trade in Europe or Asia overnight, but it isn't quite the same thing. To have a one hour difference, you effectively stretch the trading day by an hour because you'd have to include both market places. And since the entire TSX trades less volume in a day than a single large US financial institution, the Canadians have a lot to lose if there's an imbalance. The Canadian marketplace is small - it has a lot going for it - but it must play ball with the big boys next door if it hopes to continue to maintain relevance in an increasingly interconnected world.

  105. Steps for profit by enko · · Score: 1

    1. American firm sleeping with Bush patents 25 hour clock.
    2. US changes to new 25 hour time system.
    3. Spineless canadians change to 25 hour time system.
    4. ???
    5. Profit!

  106. EU and DST by sita · · Score: 1

    Then EU kicked in and harmonized the rules for changing to and from DST

    Interestingly enough, the current EU directive on daylight saving time is the ninth such directive to be issued. The eigth directive specified the date and hour to switch to and from DST, but forgot to mention the time zone. Hence Britain was out-of-synch with the rest of the union for one hour (or in-synch, depending on your point of view).

    One wonders how the heck it could take nine tries to get it right...

  107. Canada needs to match the U.S. for IT's sake!! by Bloodwine77 · · Score: 1

    Imagine all the systems that have "Central (US & Canada)", "Eastern (US & Canada)", etc. timezone settings (including Windows itself).

    If Canada does not match up to U.S., then those settings will become out-of-sync between the U.S. and Canada.

  108. The parent qualifies as "Insightful"? by Bueller_007 · · Score: 0, Troll

    So, basically, you're saying the same thing as Bush.
    Bush: "The American way of life is not negotiable."
    You: "Our use of standard time should not be negotiable."

    According to many studies, switching to DST saves fuel. (I'm not going to debate whether or not that is actually true, because you basically admitted that it was.) You're saying we SHOULDN'T try to save fuel by changing to DST? Just because you don't want to give up the idea that "time is absolute"? Now THAT is stubborn.

    Of course we should try to increase our fuel economy, BUT if we can use even less fuel by changing to DST, why is that a bad thing?

    Oil is concrete and limited. Time is abstract (and infinite?) Which is more important to you?

    1. Re:The parent qualifies as "Insightful"? by sa666_666 · · Score: 1

      According to many studies, switching to DST saves fuel. (I'm not going to debate whether or not that is actually true, because you basically admitted that it was.) You're saying we SHOULDN'T try to save fuel by changing to DST? Just because you don't want to give up the idea that "time is absolute"? Now THAT is stubborn.

      Of course we should try to increase our fuel economy, BUT if we can use even less fuel by changing to DST, why is that a bad thing?

      Because most people don't want to change the way they do things, and the government will use the 'DST saves us fuel' argument to relieve them from looking at the real thing to do; INCREASE THE EFFICIENCY OF VEHICLES.

      That's why some people are against the idea. Most other people want to put their fingers in their ears and sing 'la la la' until some politician comes along with a token gesture and tells them exactly what they want to hear. Specifically, that they can continue to live their lives without any consequences for their actions, and feel good about it.

  109. I guess... by eth1 · · Score: 1

    ...stupidity really IS contagious!

  110. Ever heard of short-haul and long-haul? by HBI · · Score: 1

    The tractors without the sleepers in the back of the cab are generally short-haul trucks that are dispatched from a local distribution center.

    They don't cross time zones very much, if they can avoid it.

    The long-haul trucks are the ones that cross time zone boundaries, and usually have trip lengths measured in days, hence, the China issue again.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  111. Quebec Language Laws by PinkPanther · · Score: 1
    Yes, there are laws in Quebec geared towards preserving the french language (and Quebec culture). It is understandable as an island surrounded by a completely different and domineering language/culture, that the older generations will fear the loss of their own language/culture. The youth get bombarded by english (Canadian and USian) television, music, Internet, so they gravitate away from their own.

    I believe the current rules are that if the parent did not have an "english" education in the province that the children must attend a french school.

    There have been some cases of pretty brutal mis-enforcements of the laws by some extreme groups. A simple search should find you more info.

    --
    It's a simple matter of complex programming.
  112. what is the point? by compro01 · · Score: 1

    DST is way overblown. I'm from Saskatchewan, and we're one of the few places that don't buy it.

    just on the news last night, one of the reporters in Ottawa was going on about the virtues of DST, saying it will reduce traffic accidents, save energy, reduce crime, [sarcasm] and even cure cancer [/sarcasm].

    last time i checked, it's still dark for the same number of hours. and i fail to see how making people get up earlier reduces accidents (if anything, i would increase them for a couple days after they move the clocks back in spring, as people are tired from getting an hour less sleep)

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  113. Re:Call me when truck dispatching to China happens by JFitzsimmons · · Score: 1

    Of all things, why don't shipping companies use UTC? There's no ambiguity there...

    --
    Beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master. -Anonymous
  114. ugh, DST by syrinx · · Score: 1

    It's like cutting off your head and standing on it to become taller.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  115. What happened without Daylight Savings Time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many decades ago they were looking to name this new northern country. The evening "turned dark" early because they were running on Standard Time, and finally in utter frustration the leader said "I'm gonna put all the letters of the alphabet in this hat, and the first three letters I pull out, that's gonna be the name of this country:"

    C, eh?
    N, eh?
    D, eh?

  116. O.T. question. by Rhipf · · Score: 1

    How does redesigning the currency ever 7-10 years help protect against counterfeiting? What is stopping someone from making money that looks like the old currency? Are they also going to make older bills non-legal tender?

  117. Re:Call me when truck dispatching to China happens by Cyberdramon · · Score: 1

    We do, when we can... but my company in particular is a broker... so we do business with many companies most of them local to the origin of whatever it is we're moving. While trying not to heavily insult their intelligence... the best thing I could say is "They're good at driving trucks".

  118. Compound stupidity? by phorm · · Score: 1

    So basically, for Canada not to follow in doing something stupid is also stupid? There's a point where somebody has to stop and say "this is dumb, I'm not doing that" rather than saying "this is dumb, but everyone else is doing it"

    1. Re:Compound stupidity? by geoffspear · · Score: 1
      It's not inherently dumb to change the dates when DST ends. It's dumb for one neighbor to do it without the other one also doing it, as it will lead to all kinds of confusion.

      The Canadians should be annoyed at the American government for deciding to do something like this without at least bilateral (and preferably international support), and there would be some satisfaction in telling the US "screw you, we're not your lapdogs." But acting stubbornly in international relations is only likely to make things worse, not better, in a lot of situations.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    2. Re:Compound stupidity? by phorm · · Score: 1

      Definately true... but the problem is: when does it end? At some point, you have to suffer the issues associated with not following a stupid trend, in order to demonstrate that you will not always blindly follow in current and future stupid trends...

  119. Re:Great idea for here! Meet NDT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    twitter, quick! There's a running story about an IT meltdown in Australia! You can jump in and blame 'M$' like you did in the Comair fiasco and look supremely stupid again! Go for it!

  120. Why do we switch back in the winter? by AxelBoldt · · Score: 1
    Daylight savings time as energy conservation makes sense to me: most people are awake from about 7am to 12pm, and the daylight before 7am in the summer is thus wasted; DST reduces the daylight before 7am.

    But why do we switch back in the winter? There's not enough daylight in the winter no matter how you slice it. Whether the sun comes up at 8am and goes down at 4pm, or comes up at 9am and goes down at 5pm, what's the difference? In both scenarios we need 10 hours of artificial lighting per day.

    So why not simply set clocks one or two hours ahead once and for all, and be done with it?

  121. Re:Stock Markets! by GecKo213 · · Score: 1
    stock markets/...to operate 8 till 4 instead of 9 till 5

    The NYSE is open from 9:30 am - 4:00 pm Eastern Time. Just an FYI.

    --
    Generation Trance: What generation are you?
  122. Re:auto shifting times by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

    Also stuff that's a little more critical than your VCR. Like traffic lights.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!