Slashdot Mirror


Ancient Greek Computer Reconstructed

afaik_ianal writes "A working reconstruction of an ancient Greek computer, the Antikythera mechanism, which was found at the bottom of the ocean in 1900 has been unveiled and is on display at the Technopolis museum, in Athens. The device is believed to have been used to calculate the positions of various celestial bodies including the sun and the moon on any given date. While some guesswork was required in the reconstruction, the bulk of the design is based on updated X-ray photographs of the device."

266 comments

  1. First Greek Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Alpha and the Omega and all that.

    1. Re:First Greek Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yet another redundant moderation for the first post on a discussion? Where did the mods go to school? Greece?

    2. Re:First Greek Post by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Well, until they get around to implementing that "-1, Stupid" flag, I guess we're stuck with either that or "Offtopic."

      And to someone who's meta-moderating later and won't know that the post was a FP, "Redundant" seems more believable.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    3. Re:First Greek Post by Brian4120 · · Score: 1

      Look at that. i never thought in my lifetime i would see a +3 funny on a first post.
      time to go kill myself.

    4. Re:First Greek Post by rlanctot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just imagine, a Beowulf cluster of these... er, wait. Was Beowulf written at that time? Dammit!

    5. Re:First Greek Post by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just imagine a phalanx of these!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    6. Re:First Greek Post by identity0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently, they did build a Illiad cluster of these, but it got Trojaned and 0wn3d.

      They are now trying to build a Minotaur cluster with them, and using the Labrynth Firewall system to protect it.

    7. Re:First Greek Post by DrEldarion · · Score: 1

      They'd be able to destroy tanks!

    8. Re:First Greek Post by aamcf · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's nothing. I just got a *helpful* person when I rang my credit card company's help line!

    9. Re:First Greek Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1, Geeky

    10. Re:First Greek Post by Eric+Giguere · · Score: 2, Funny

      Funny, I didn't think the DEC Alpha had such a long history.

      Eric
      View your headers here
    11. Re:First Greek Post by WilliamSChips · · Score: 5, Funny

      I know this is a really bad pun, but oh well.
      +1, Greeky
      You can kill me now.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    12. Re:First Greek Post by ngoy · · Score: 1

      ROFLMAO, Wiki says "This article has recently been linked from Slashdot. Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism."

      Does this always happen when /. links to Wiki?

      --
      --ngoy
    13. Re:First Greek Post by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      No. Sometimes they just protect the page from changes.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    14. Re:First Greek Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow guys, this must be the festival of humor or something like that...

    15. Re:First Greek Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this article is like 3 years old. it says on the top of the page of the article: 2002, gosh people. way to go slashdot, gg ytmnd lawl roflmao rofflemmaaoooo!!!1

  2. But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it run Linux?

    1. Re:But by toupsie · · Score: 3, Funny

      or support Ogg Vorbis?

      --
      Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
    2. Re:But by MiKM · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but a NetBSD port is nearing completion.

    3. Re:But by Lillesvin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Apparently, yes... "Spyridon Stais noticed that one of the pieces of rock had a gear wheel embedded in it." (from wikipedia).

      That's KDE, baby! :-p

      --
      "Live free or don't."
    4. Re:But by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Does it run Linux?

      No, but there is a Troyan Horse already.

    5. Re:But by SuperDJ · · Score: 1

      Not yet, but remember, Doom has to be ported to it first.

      --
      RTJKJAS
    6. Re:But by Jozer99 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Imagine a beowolf cluster.

    7. Re:But by appleLaserWriter · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does it run Linux?

      Well, the ship crashed, so we can easily surmise that it ran an ancient form of Windows. Perhaps even Windows 3.0. However, the ship must have been part of a trading network, so it could have had Windows 3.11 for workgroups.

    8. Re:But by Zediker · · Score: 1

      More important... can it do my research project without me even asking it to?

      --
      I love to slaughter the english language.
    9. Re:But by laffer1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, I suspect it was Microsoft Windows Age of Mythology edition.

    10. Re:But by bcat24 · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, a Beowulf cluster of these imagine YOU!

  3. Doesn't anyone remember ... by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... the clockwork owl in Clash of the Titans?

    Clearly the ancient Greeks had mechanical technology beyond even modern capabilities!

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    1. Re:Doesn't anyone remember ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, I used to love that movie when I was a kid. The owl was so cool. I got kind of a funny feeling when the girl was helplessly chained to the rock and in danger of being devoured by a monster. o_O

    2. Re:Doesn't anyone remember ... by zennor · · Score: 1

      I was hoping to forget it!!

    3. Re:Doesn't anyone remember ... by Wavicle · · Score: 1

      OMFG, didn't you pay attention?! The Gods made the clockwork owl! c'mon we know that the Greek Pantheon of Gods is more sophisticated than we are today.

      Wait! What if this computer were actually made by the Gods?? Maybe we now have irrefutable proof of their existence! Take THAT Greek God-Biatches, not so omniscient now are you? ARE YOU?!

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    4. Re:Doesn't anyone remember ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it was the "funny feeling" he gets when he chains girls up and leaves them to die.

    5. Re:Doesn't anyone remember ... by lcsjk · · Score: 1

      Remember what?

  4. They don't build them like they used to by saskboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "The Antikythera mechanism, as it is now known, was originally housed in a wooden box about the size of a shoebox, with dials on the outside and a complex assembly of bronze gear wheels within."

    Anyone place odds on our gold and copper monstrosities from the 70's on surviving thousands of years and people figuring out what they were used for? There's something to be said about elegantly simple one use devices like calculators.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:They don't build them like they used to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Anyone place odds on...monstrosities from the 70's on surviving thousands of years and people figuring out what they were used for?
      Sadly, disco lives.

      Additionally, unless there is some global cataclysm, clients will continue using their POS big iron (and not just to heat certain rooms or throw confounded tape I/O errors, baffling modern man).
    2. Re:They don't build them like they used to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone wanna place odds on intelligent life existing for a couple thousand more years?

    3. Re:They don't build them like they used to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Anyone wanna place odds on intelligent life existing now?

  5. At least a 100 years ago. by Negroiso · · Score: 1, Informative

    I saw a documentary on this on the Discovery channel at least a 100 years ago. I suppose now its just "traveling". They have had this thing running for a while.

    1. Re:At least a 100 years ago. by ludomancer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You saw this thing on the Discovery channel in 1905? Clearly your Clockwork Greek Television was ahead of it's time!

    2. Re:At least a 100 years ago. by Mahou · · Score: 1

      check out the date of TFA

      Sep 19th 2002

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    3. Re:At least a 100 years ago. by 10scjed · · Score: 1

      I too recall seeing a special on this, but i dont think they had a working reproduction - they were still completely mystified really, now they have reverse engineered what they think was the mechanism. Likely there are some subtleties yet to be realized.

      --
      --10scjed IANAL,AFAIK
    4. Re:At least a 100 years ago. by mikael · · Score: 1

      Early TV's from the 1930's were mechanical. See Mechanical TV - How it works.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  6. Probably slashdotted soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here's the text:

    The Antikythera mechanism
    The clockwork computer

    Sep 19th 2002
    From The Economist print edition
    An ancient piece of clockwork shows the deep roots of modern technology

    WHEN a Greek sponge diver called Elias Stadiatos discovered the wreck of a cargo ship off the tiny island of Antikythera in 1900, it was the statues lying on the seabed that made the greatest impression on him. He returned to the surface, removed his helmet, and gabbled that he had found a heap of dead, naked women. The ship's cargo of luxury goods also included jewellery, pottery, fine furniture, wine and bronzes dating back to the first century BC. But the most important finds proved to be a few green, corroded lumps--the last remnants of an elaborate mechanical device.

    The Antikythera mechanism, as it is now known, was originally housed in a wooden box about the size of a shoebox, with dials on the outside and a complex assembly of bronze gear wheels within. X-ray photographs of the fragments, in which around 30 separate gears can be distinguished, led the late Derek Price, a science historian at Yale University, to conclude that the device was an astronomical computer capable of predicting the positions of the sun and moon in the zodiac on any given date. A new analysis, though, suggests that the device was cleverer than Price thought, and reinforces the evidence for his theory of an ancient Greek tradition of complex mechanical technology.

    Michael Wright, the curator of mechanical engineering at the Science Museum in London, has based his new analysis on detailed X-rays of the mechanism using a technique called linear tomography. This involves moving an X-ray source, the film and the object being investigated relative to one another, so that only features in a particular plane come into focus. Analysis of the resulting images, carried out in conjunction with Allan Bromley, a computer scientist at Sydney University, found the exact position of each gear, and suggested that Price was wrong in several respects.

    In some cases, says Mr Wright, Price seems to have "massaged" the number of teeth on particular gears (most of which are, admittedly, incomplete) in order to arrive at significant astronomical ratios. Price's account also, he says, displays internal contradictions, selective use of evidence and unwarranted speculation. In particular, it postulates an elaborate reversal mechanism to get some gears to turn in the right direction.

    Since so little of the mechanism survives, some guesswork is unavoidable. But Mr Wright noticed a fixed boss at the centre of the mechanism's main wheel. To his instrument-maker's eye, this was suggestive of a fixed central gear around which other moving gears could rotate. This does away with the need for Price's reversal mechanism and leads to the idea that the device was specifically designed to model a particular form of "epicyclic" motion.

    The Greeks believed in an earth-centric universe and accounted for celestial bodies' motions using elaborate models based on epicycles, in which each body describes a circle (the epicycle) around a point that itself moves in a circle around the earth. Mr Wright found evidence that the Antikythera mechanism would have been able to reproduce the motions of the sun and moon accurately, using an epicyclic model devised by Hipparchus, and of the planets Mercury and Venus, using an epicyclic model derived by Apollonius of Perga. (These models, which predate the mechanism, were subsequently incorporated into the work of Claudius Ptolemy in the second century AD.)

    A device that just modelled the motions of the sun, moon, Mercury and Venus does not make much sense. But if an upper layer of mechanism had been built, and lost, these extra gears could have modelled the motions of the three other planets known at the time--Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. In other words, the device may have been able to predict the positions of the known celestial bodies for any given date with a respectable degree of accuracy, usin

  7. Is it a computer? by TeacherOfHeroes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm torn between marveling at the enginuity behind this and pointing out that this is really bluring the line between 'computer' and 'glorified watch'. Even the wikipedia article it links to describes this as a clockwork mechanism.

    When the title reads 'ancient greek computer', I would expect something more along the lines of the machine that Babbage designed.

    1. Re:Is it a computer? by stevesliva · · Score: 1

      No one said it was programmable.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    2. Re:Is it a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The parent comment has a good point. If a computer is simply any man-made device that takes information and makes it more recordable, calculable, or accessible, then this device qualifies, as well as any mechanical watch, or any magnifying glass for that matter.

      Presuming that one could have wound this device forward, to see future positions of these planets, I would argue that one can do that with the minute hand of many mecanical clocks.

      OTOH, I don't know of any mechanical (sprocket and gear) clocks that predate this.

      Pedantically speaking, however, a sundial would meet the above explanation, in that light rays/particles hit contrived designs on a sundial, from which pattern one can determine the time of day.

      a) 45+2=1 for qualified values of 1.
      b) Is language prescriptive and/or descriptive and all that...
      c) how much of the meaning of your life your life life depends on how you define, "meaning"?
      d) more or less pedantic blah.

    3. Re:Is it a computer? by lawpoop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You're right -- it's a computer that caculates a single problem. OTOH, if the greeks who built this lived on another planet, they could take the same principles and build another device that calculated the positions of those planets. Yet again, this isn't a general planetary positioning device, it just shows the future positions of *particular* planets.

      I'm coming down on the side of 'glorified watch.' Just wind it up and watch it go. No programming, no modularity, no general problem solving. Certainly nowhere near a Turing machine.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    4. Re:Is it a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we all know it ran linux... I mean why else would there be an os that was so secure... it's been around forever.

    5. Re:Is it a computer? by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Even the wikipedia article it links to describes this as a clockwork mechanism."

      But then it goes on to explain:

      "The device is all the more impressive for its use of a differential gear, which was previously believed to have been invented in the 16th century."

      It's far more sophisticated than a clockwork. Call it what you want, but it is a significant discovery in the history of analog computers.

    6. Re:Is it a computer? by iocat · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's a single-problem solving analog computer of the classic, pre-Turing sense. They used to have all kinds of crap like this for solving various problems. Easier (at the time) (and probably cooler) than a book filled with lists. Not a Turing complete machine by any sense... more like the ABC device that people are always claiming was the "first computer," than an ENIAC.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    7. Re:Is it a computer? by Alien+Being · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "No programming, no modularity, no general problem solving."

      Programming was done by selecting and arranging gears. Modularity was accomplished by adding layers, coupling the shafts from one layer to another. I'd even go so far as to say that it's general purpose in the sense of an "Erector Set".

      Differential gears make this device far more interesting than any other mechanical clockwork I've ever seen.

    8. Re:Is it a computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all computers are programmable.

    9. Re:Is it a computer? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1
      My draft-stopper of an enormous India-paper Webster's Unabridged from 1953 (Yard sale, $3) describes "Computer n. (archaic) One who computes."

      At sea, brass (or bronze) was more reliable than parchment or papyrus.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    10. Re:Is it a computer? by stuckinarut · · Score: 1

      Originally, a "computer" was a person who performed numerical calculations under the direction of a mathematician, often with the aid of a variety of mechanical calculating devices from the abacus onward.

      I think most people would agree that the first computer in the sense that we understand today would be Babbage's machine but this wasn't the original understanding of the term.

    11. Re:Is it a computer? by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      Yet again, this isn't a general planetary positioning device, it just shows the future positions of *particular* planets.

      I'm coming down on the side of 'glorified watch.' Just wind it up and watch it go. No programming, no modularity, no general problem solving. Certainly nowhere near a Turing machine.

      While it only works in one very specific problem domain, I would point out ...

      • This was probably over a thousand years before the mechanical clock was invented
      • Somone had to work out the equations to build the model
      • Babbages difference engine wasn't a general purpose computer either


      The existence of mechanical clockwork type stuff that old demonstrates that we clearly used to know a lot more than we've been told.

      I don't exactly think I'd poo-poo what was invented 2000 years ago because it hasn't got modular programming and the like.
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    12. Re:Is it a computer? by mbbac · · Score: 1

      A computer is something used to compute something. A watch computes time. Before we had VAX, we had rooms full of women doing addition -- and they were called computers.

      --

      mbbac

    13. Re:Is it a computer? by MorePower · · Score: 1
      Babbages difference engine wasn't a general purpose computer either

      No, his Analytical engine was the computer. I assume that's what the original poster was talking about.

    14. Re:Is it a computer? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      It's a single-problem solving analog computer of the classic, pre-Turing sense. They used to have all kinds of crap like this for solving various problems. Easier (at the time) (and probably cooler) than a book filled with lists. Not a Turing complete machine by any sense... more like the ABC device that people are always claiming was the "first computer," than an ENIAC.

      I'm sure that there's a better definition around. Otherwise, I'd be able to make a problem statement like...the room is dark. And, then the switch/wiring/bulb would be the computer and I'd be programming when I turned it on/off. My house has a whole network of these :P

      Maybe it's the type of problem that matters? Where do we split the definition of computer from the definition of tool?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    15. Re:Is it a computer? by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Pick up a book and read about the computers of WWII.

      American Submarines utilized a complex device called the TDC (Torpedo Data Computer). It was an electromechanical device that would take measurements from he periscope with range, direction, and speed estimates from the crew, and formulate a firing resolution for the Torpedoes.

      Similar devices were used by other navies on Battleships to work out the firing resolutions on the larger cannons.

      Back on point, just because it is clockwork doesn't mean it can't be a computer. Babbages own early attempts were themselves clockwork.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    16. Re:Is it a computer? by tpgp · · Score: 2, Funny

      No programming, no modularity, no general problem solving, less space then an ipod. Lame.

      --
      My pics.
    17. Re:Is it a computer? by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      The modern computer is regulated to "do stuff" each clock cycle, which, since we have harnessed electrons to do the ticking instead of gears, happens very very rapidly. As I write this post, it's as if millions of different microscopic "clock hands" (flowing electrons) are doing certain things. Typing on this keyboard is like moving the second hand 360 degrees (which advances the minute hand and ultimately the hour hand), only doing it lots and lots of different directions, with much more complex behavior of "what happens when such and such happens."

      So yes, I'd still call it a very basic computer. A watch IS a very basic computer. So basic it's "understandable" by just looking at it. The modern computer is so complex, and tiny, that you can't understand it just by looking at it. That's the only difference: size!

    18. Re:Is it a computer? by cavemanf16 · · Score: 1

      I hate replying to my own post, but I just thought of this facet of computing that I'd like to add:

      Modern computers are just glorified watches. They're so intricately complex and microscopic watches, that to our perception, some of what they are capable of doing somehow makes them "mysterious" and therefore a "computer." And some people think that one day "artificial intelligence" will attain sentience and be able to "think" on its own. But I say that ultimately this is impossible. At some level, that machine with the very complex programming and equipment is still only a very very VERY sophisticated watch at its core. To a human, yes, it may on the surface appear to be "thinking" as it talks to you, listens to you, and is able to carry on an "intelligent" discussion with you. But it IS fully explainable. It may take you hundreds or thousands of years to explain each and every action of the machine, but it is understandable and will never make an "irrational decision." Each and every action will be built upon some defined, pre-programmed, mechanical, fully logical "next step."

      As I always say to people when I'm trying to repair their PC: "It's only a machine, there is an explanation for each and every action, but I don't always have the knowledge about how to repair every problem without causing other problems."

    19. Re:Is it a computer? by iocat · · Score: 1
      Otherwise, I'd be able to make a problem statement like...the room is dark. And, then the switch/wiring/bulb would be the computer and I'd be programming when I turned it on/off. My house has a whole network of these :P

      But, at its most basic, that's exactly true! Light bulbs are even vaccum tubes! But obviously I see what you mean ;0

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    20. Re:Is it a computer? by instarx · · Score: 1

      I'm torn between marveling at the enginuity behind this and pointing out that this is really bluring the line between 'computer' and 'glorified watch'. Even the wikipedia article it links to describes this as a clockwork mechanism.

      First, I wouldn't rely on Wikipedia as a definitive source for anything, but that is another topic.

      Second, just because a device uses a clockwork mechanism doesn't mean it is a clock. For example, the fire-control computers used on ships in WWII used clockwork mechanicanism to accurately predict the fall of shells and no one denies that they were computers.

      It seems to me that the difference between a "watch" and a "computer" is that the watch doesn't calculate or predict anything, it just tells you what time it is now, while a computer does predict and calculate based on variable input. This device could clearly be used to predict or calculate the positions of the planets, sun and moon in the past or the future. Seems pretty obviously a computer to me.

  8. and was used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    for watching ancient Greek porn.

    1. Re:and was used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not good unless you accept homosexuality and pederasty.

      Although...maybe we could get some from the island of Lesbos...

    2. Re:and was used by viralburn · · Score: 1

      Greek Geek pr0n ... is that greek style or geek style ?

    3. Re:and was used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      imagine the bushes on those babes !

  9. Pffft... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Clearly the ancient Greeks had mechanical technology beyond even modern capabilities!

    HAH! That's NOTHING! What you must see, is their Orichalcum robots!

  10. /. - Home of the Dupe by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

    It was not a celestial tracking device but rather A Clock That Runs For 10,000 Years... or until the ship transporting it through the Bermuda Triangle capsizes and re-appears in Ancient Greece.

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
    1. Re:/. - Home of the Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, in arguement I recently had with someone about The Clock of the Long Now they link to this article (apparently to support there claim it would never last). First time i had heard about it. Now this. It's like god is a clockmaker, setting everything in motion... and building lots of crazy clocks.

  11. Like dodgy software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excellent, they built it but they are not sure what it does. I have written software like that.

  12. Actually... by Evil+Butters · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...which was found at the bottom of the ocean in 1900...

    Actually, it was found in 2000. Just that no one thought to correct for Y2K problems!

    --
    Homer no function beer well without.
  13. Non-troll mirror by loraksus · · Score: 4, Informative

    (notice the date, not quite "news")

    The Antikythera mechanism
    The clockwork computer

    Sep 19th 2002
    From The Economist print edition
    An ancient piece of clockwork shows the deep roots of modern technology

    WHEN a Greek sponge diver called Elias Stadiatos discovered the wreck of a cargo ship off the tiny island of Antikythera in 1900, it was the statues lying on the seabed that made the greatest impression on him. He returned to the surface, removed his helmet, and gabbled that he had found a heap of dead, naked women. The ship's cargo of luxury goods also included jewellery, pottery, fine furniture, wine and bronzes dating back to the first century BC. But the most important finds proved to be a few green, corroded lumps--the last remnants of an elaborate mechanical device.

    The Antikythera mechanism, as it is now known, was originally housed in a wooden box about the size of a shoebox, with dials on the outside and a complex assembly of bronze gear wheels within. X-ray photographs of the fragments, in which around 30 separate gears can be distinguished, led the late Derek Price, a science historian at Yale University, to conclude that the device was an astronomical computer capable of predicting the positions of the sun and moon in the zodiac on any given date. A new analysis, though, suggests that the device was cleverer than Price thought, and reinforces the evidence for his theory of an ancient Greek tradition of complex mechanical technology.

    Michael Wright, the curator of mechanical engineering at the Science Museum in London, has based his new analysis on detailed X-rays of the mechanism using a technique called linear tomography. This involves moving an X-ray source, the film and the object being investigated relative to one another, so that only features in a particular plane come into focus. Analysis of the resulting images, carried out in conjunction with Allan Bromley, a computer scientist at Sydney University, found the exact position of each gear, and suggested that Price was wrong in several respects.

    In some cases, says Mr Wright, Price seems to have "massaged" the number of teeth on particular gears (most of which are, admittedly, incomplete) in order to arrive at significant astronomical ratios. Price's account also, he says, displays internal contradictions, selective use of evidence and unwarranted speculation. In particular, it postulates an elaborate reversal mechanism to get some gears to turn in the right direction.

    Since so little of the mechanism survives, some guesswork is unavoidable. But Mr Wright noticed a fixed boss at the centre of the mechanism's main wheel. To his instrument-maker's eye, this was suggestive of a fixed central gear around which other moving gears could rotate. This does away with the need for Price's reversal mechanism and leads to the idea that the device was specifically designed to model a particular form of "epicyclic" motion.

    The Greeks believed in an earth-centric universe and accounted for celestial bodies' motions using elaborate models based on epicycles, in which each body describes a circle (the epicycle) around a point that itself moves in a circle around the earth. Mr Wright found evidence that the Antikythera mechanism would have been able to reproduce the motions of the sun and moon accurately, using an epicyclic model devised by Hipparchus, and of the planets Mercury and Venus, using an epicyclic model derived by Apollonius of Perga. (These models, which predate the mechanism, were subsequently incorporated into the work of Claudius Ptolemy in the second century AD.)

    A device that just modelled the motions of the sun, moon, Mercury and Venus does not make much sense. But if an upper layer of mechanism had been built, and lost, these extra gears could have modelled the motions of the three other planets known at the time--Mars, Jupiter and Saturn. In other words, the device may have been able to predict the positions of the known celestial bodies for any given date with a respectable degre

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    1. Re:Non-troll mirror by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Well, the current /. article isn't really about the device itself, it's actually about the unveiling of a new working reconstruction of the device, based on X-ray imagery of the original.

      So while I'm sure most of the discussion will be about the ancient invention, the article does have a (albeit thin) excuse for its own existence on the front page today: the particular event of the unveiling of the reconstruction. That's the "news," the rest is just background, and as you've pointed out, has already been reported.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    2. Re:Non-troll mirror by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful
      No, the "current" /. TFA is dated September 19th, 2002. Just a few more years and it'd be the Antikythera article. There's no unveiling taking place this week. It was unveiled three years ago.

      That said, it's still a cool device. Creating a mechanical clockwork that recreates an earth-centric viewpoint of the planetary motion is a remarkable feat in virtually any age.

      --
      John
  14. listen by shoelessone · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    you guys dont know shit about computers. I go to colege. Do you guys know what colege even is?

    here is what I do: attend a very prestigous school, where there is a shit ton of smart fuckers. A-Z-Ns. Do you guys even know what those are? Because I once slept with one. Ok, yes, she was a little drunk. Ok, maybe I shouldn't have. But the point remains: I know a lot about computers. Whats more, i'm greek. So I know a TON about greeks+computers. Gyros. Do you guys even know what those are? Let me tell you, they are really incredibly good. Lamb meat. OMG, so good. I love it. Go greek computers!

    1. Re:listen by nekoes · · Score: 4, Funny

      Greek computers have the fastest processors. No shit. I read it on slashdot.

      --
      Hey, it's my OPINION that dogs have eight legs and make a sound like a car horn every time they take a piss.
    2. Re:listen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I go to a somewhat prestigious university. Here, we already know that college has two l's.

  15. Presenting the device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "While some guesswork was required in the reconstruction, the bulk of the design is based on updated X-ray photographs of the device."

    Reporter: So what do you think the device is for?
    Archaeologist: Well we can't be entirely sure, but if you look at this X-Ray you can see what appears to be a cup-holder.

    1. Re:Presenting the device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, those CD-ROM drives have been around since forever!

  16. Dupe by airrage · · Score: 1

    No, mega-dupe! Did I just coin a phrase!?!

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
    1. Re:Dupe by IInventedTheInternet · · Score: 1

      No, you did not! Did I just coin a phrase!?!

  17. I bet it ran Windows, Millenium Edition no less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That old, if you extrapolate Moore's law backwards it just had to be a two-bit computer....

  18. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how much ram it had? or did they use slaves to power it?

  19. Greek? by tono · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the wikipedia article is right, that the clockwork was produced in 87BCE then the clockwork was actually Roman, as the whole of modern and ancient Greece was under Roman control at that time. Also, it's not a computer, it's a damn clockwork.

    --
    cheese logs keep my wang warm at night.
    1. Re:Greek? by jericho4.0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      The Greeks ended as an empire in 146 BC, when Rome defeated the Achaean League and and razed Cornith as a final gesture of power. The end of Ancient Greece is usually considered the death of Alexander the Great, 323 BC.

      It isn't a computer, though.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    2. Re:Greek? by LittleBigLui · · Score: 1
      device built in 87 BC, greek empire fell 146 BC

      It isn't a computer, though.


      You misspelled "either". (hint: they counted their years backwards back then.)
      --
      Free as in mason.
    3. Re:Greek? by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Well it could be much older. It is quite "possibly" ;) _atlantisian_ imported by greeks before the fall of Atlantis.

    4. Re:Greek? by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 1

      Greeks consider there to be a continuity in Greek culture from proto-historical civilisations on what is currently Greek soil all the way to current era. Since, historically, every single civilisation that conquered Greece was later assimilated by them (Romans would be an excellent example, actually), that would appear to be the correct way of going through things.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    5. Re:Greek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      There was no Greek empire - ever. There was an Athenian empire, but that never controlled all of the Greek city-states. Many of the Greek city-states maintained some degree of autonomy under the Macedonians, Roman Republic, and early Empire. Augustus himself confirmed Athens' autonomy (not independence, mind you, but autonomy - the Roman imperial administration didn't start interfering with internal issues until Caligula, I suspect). The Greeks considered themselves Greeks (and the Romans considered them Greeks) for at least 250 years after the fall of Corinth (in 146, yes) and Syracuse (in 212 BCE; remember Archimedes?). In the later empire and through until the fall of Constantinople to the Turks, they considered themselves romaioi - which is Greek for "Roman." So describing this as a Greek calculating mechanism is perfectly valid. (But no, it is not a computer.)

    6. Re:Greek? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I highly doubt that it was produced in the year 87BCE. That's still 553,977 years in the future!

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    7. Re:Greek? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Since, historically, every single civilisation that conquered Greece was later assimilated by them (Romans would be an excellent example, actually),

      Even to the point that quite a few "Roman technologies" turn out to actually be of Greek origin.

    8. Re:Greek? by I+confirm+I'm+not+a · · Score: 1

      It is quite "possibly" ;) _atlantisian_ imported by greeks before the fall of Atlantis.

      Nah, it's been dated to about 87 BC. My theory is that the Greeks ripped off Atlantean IP. Those Ancient Greeks better hope the Atlanteans didn't sell their IP to SCO before disappearing forever...

      --
      This is where the serious fun begins.
    9. Re:Greek? by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Not only did the Romans consider the Greeks to be Greek, they would have thought it absurd to call a Greek "Roman". The Romans had a strange relationship with Greece - they admired the ancient teachings, the knowledge, the philosophy of Greek times, and often hired Greeks as teachers and tutors. At the same time, Romans of certain classes during the late Republic and early Imperium also looked down a bit at the Greeks as a softer, more hedonistic people.

      As for your claim about there being no Greek empire ever, I suppose most people would say that Alexander the Great's Macedonian-seated empire was as close as it comes. It was certainly a pan-Hellenic empire, and thoroughly Greek in culture and outlook, though it didn't originate in any of the Greek city-states.

    10. Re:Greek? by Commander+Spock · · Score: 0

      Are you sure that they counted their years backwards? I thought it was just us "modern" folks counting their years backwards...

    11. Re:Greek? by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the problem is anyone who has been in an art museum knows that modern Greeks do not at all resemble the people who inhabited that land in antiquity. There is also the small manner of many Eastern influences, such as Greek music. Greeks today are primarily a Turkic/Slavic people, and most of their culture is derived from that ancestry.

      The Greeks of antiquity are gone, assimilated with the many invaders which have conquered their land, and that is why today they contribute pretty much nothing in comparison to the past. Such is the legacy of all great people.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    12. Re:Greek? by Knara · · Score: 1

      Actually, the technologies that the Romans are most known for are largely Etruscan, not Greek (the Etruscans did use Greek letters in their alphabet, though, if I remember; but culturally they weren't Greek).

    13. Re:Greek? by Hunnywoot · · Score: 1

      Happy Birthday on Sunday, Jericho....

  20. Ancient technology by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    Better tell Daniel Jackson so he can translate the writings. Now if we just find out where the Stargate is.

    1. Re:Ancient technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's sitting on the far side of that shark.

    2. Re:Ancient technology by drwho · · Score: 1

      Damned Stargate geeks...I am becoming addicted to that show. Just watched '1969' for the second time. You know, Daniel does look pretty good with those tiny glasses and his hair slicked back.

      But yeah, the ancients...Merlin was one...Do you think Jesus was a goa'uld?

    3. Re:Ancient technology by EtherealStrife · · Score: 1

      Come on man, keep up! The Stargate is buried in Egypt, not Greece. The Greeks are the ones with the giant death rays...

    4. Re:Ancient technology by Unordained · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend decides whether or not a rerun episode is worth watching based on which season it is -- not for the acting, but for how good Shanks looks in that season. Season 6 (when Jackson is ascended) is her favorite; she mumbles something about how "hot" he looks in his little white sweater. It gets a wee bit disturbing.

    5. Re:Ancient technology by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      Yes, of course, there is the one that was uncovered at the dig in Giza in the 1930s. But that sucker blew up on the Dark Side of the Moon.

      And the other was in Antarctica. It's locked up in Cheyenne mountain right now.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    6. Re:Ancient technology by Liam+Slider · · Score: 1

      No, it's more complicated than that. The original gate was beamed aboard Thor's ship so SG-1 could escape when it was infested with replicators. The ship was destroyed, but the gate survived and was recovered by the Russians. The Antarctic Gate was used in Cheyenne mountain until Anubis used an Ancient weapon designed to use one Stargate to destroy another to blow it up. Then the original gate was leased back from the Russians in exchange for a bunch of money, technology, and their own SG-team.

  21. this just in by coredump-0x00001 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Linux kernel has been successfully ported to the Antikythera mechanism, The highly distilled version of the kernel reportedly can boot in under 160 years and the process also effectively builds large amounts of forearm muscle in the process. Linuxworld.com calls it the perfect marrige between grassroot technological history and modern innovation, Steve Jobbs is currently preparing to manufacture a mini version of the Antikythera mechanism which will eventually make it's way into every Apple product. Microsoft has called the Antikythera mechanism the most astonishing technologinal innovation the world and microsoft have ever seen, Bill Gates said in an interview, "It's changing the way we have looked at computer technology completely, throughout the entire reign of microsoft we have never even considered this master-designed technology!"

    1. Re:this just in by mad.frog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but does it run Doom?

    2. Re:this just in by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

      Microsoft has called the Antikythera mechanism the most astonishing technologinal innovation the world and microsoft have ever seen

      The Antikythera mechanism is *not* user friendly, and until it is Antikythera will stay with >1% marketshare.

      Take installation. Antikythera zealots are now saying "oh installing is so easy, just do hammer-dowel install package or hit package": Yes, because hitting with "hammer" makes so much more sense to new users than double-whipping a slave that does "setups".

      Antikythera zealots are far too forgiving when judging the difficultly of Antikythera configuration issues and far too harsh when judging the difficulty of slave storage issues. Example comments:

      User: "How do I get Quake 0.03 to run in Antikythera?" Zealot: "Oh that's easy! If you have Redtoga, you have to smelt quake_3_rh_8_i686_010203_glibc.tin, then do chmod +x with a file.....

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  22. Navigation Aide by joemontoya · · Score: 1

    If you have an accurate model of what the sky looks like, you where you are and what time it is.

    1. Re:Navigation Aide by plover · · Score: 3, Informative
      The device you described is called an astrolabe. It's a different device, and much, much simpler. You don't need any gears to make an astrolabe, just the positions of some major stars for night observations, and of the sun for day observations. And note that with an astrolabe you either need to know "what time it is" or "where you are", and with one of those pieces of information (and an astrolabe) you can find the other.

      This clockwork planetary displaying device is (today) properly called an orrery, although it predates the Earl of Orrery by about 18 centuries. It also predates the astrolabe by about a thousand years, too.

      Not that you can't use an orrery to occasionally tell the date, but much of the time you won't have enough information to get a valid reading. It's completely useless during the day, and even at night some of the planets are usually "too near" the sun to be visible. Occasionally, the planetary alignment is such that none of the "visible" planets can be seen for weeks at a time.

      Also note that an orrery doesn't necessarily provide "altitude" information. I'm unaware of any hand-held clockwork orreries that do (including modern ones.) While you can base the date on azimuth readings of the planets, many of them move so slowly across the night sky that it could be difficult to make an accurate reading; especially with the tools of 87 B.C. The fixed stars are much easier to locate, and altitude is much, much easier to read than azimuth (gravity is a much easier reference to use than some concept of north.)

      --
      John
    2. Re:Navigation Aide by joemontoya · · Score: 1

      This device was used to determine longitude, not latitude.

  23. Translation of 'linked by Slashdot' message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'This article has recently been linked from Slashdot.
    Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.'

    This page has just been linked to by Slashdot, keep an eye on those dodgy characters.

  24. yeah but... by majest!k · · Score: 0, Redundant

    does it run apache?

    --
    smattawichu
    1. Re:yeah but... by musakko · · Score: 2, Funny
      does it run apache?

      It'll definately run Oracle

    2. Re:yeah but... by ccozan · · Score: 1

      nah, a Zeus Web Server :)

    3. Re:yeah but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In delphi...

    4. Re:yeah but... by pcnetworx1 · · Score: 1

      MOP PARENTS UP!

    5. Re:yeah but... by skaternum · · Score: 1

      Come on, somebod mod this up. That was clever!

  25. This proves that... by chris_eineke · · Score: 4, Funny

    the greeks were geeks. :P

    --
    "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    1. Re:This proves that... by jangobongo · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that they are the original founders of the Lambda Lambda Lambda fraternity, then, hmmm?

      --

      Sig cancelled due to lack of interest
    2. Re:This proves that... by chris_eineke · · Score: 1

      If you are a self-proclaimed geek or nerd and you haven't seen this movie, then you are a failure as geek or nerd. :)

      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    3. Re:This proves that... by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      But... the Greeks don't want no freaks.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  26. YAY! by distantbody · · Score: 1

    YAY! no images.

  27. Uh... looka t the date? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Has anyone else noticed that the Economist article linked is from 2002?

  28. Love the Wikipedia "Warning" by Kadin2048 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone else find it slightly amusing that Wikipedia stamps a big warning across the page as soon as it gets Slashdotted? Complete with a warning to look out for trolls? I'm sure it's not new, but I guess I've just always ignored it in the past.

    It's brilliant. Maybe we should include one at the top of every /. article from now on.

    On a sidenote, wouldn't it make sense to link to the static version of a Wikipedia entry page, rather than the top / dynamic one? I guess it would detract from the whole editable purpose of Wikipedia, but in terms of providing a reference -- which is what this article is using it for -- it seems like it would be safer to link against a static page of a specific revision, and then let people see the newest version if they wanted to.

    Of course if they did that, we'd never get to see their 'Do Not Feed The Trolls' warning.

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    1. Re:Love the Wikipedia "Warning" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice that the edit history mentions the blog, Slashdot.

    2. Re:Love the Wikipedia "Warning" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah.. Vandalism has happned to this page already. After /.ing. Its dissapointing to see that /. is frequented by kiddies who think its Uberleet to deface a page.

      ~AC

    3. Re:Love the Wikipedia "Warning" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the Wikipedia complains about search engines eating up their bandwith, maybe we should just link to the cached page from one of the major search engines

    4. Re:Love the Wikipedia "Warning" by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1
      Since the Wikipedia complains about search engines eating up their bandwith, maybe we should just link to the cached page from one of the major search engines


      I didn't realize that the Wikipedia people were complaining about that (not that I really pay that much attention) but if it's true then it wouldn't be hard to use one of the search engine caches or the more specific Slashdot caches, or even Coral. People just tend not to use them in the article bodies for whatever reason (I think it's because deep down, they want to melt somebody's webserver).
      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  29. Ancient Greece vs the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People in Ancient Greece over two thousand years ago had many things the US and other Western countries claim to have invented much later. Everything from democracy, theater, architecture, clocks, mechanical toys, Hero's heat engines, sport competitions, etc. Not only they knew that the Earth was round, they even managed to measure its diamemeter. They are the fathers of mathematics, which is the mother of all knowledge. Ancient Chinese and Egyptians had bits and pieces of mathematical knowledge but they failed to grasp the big picture and unlike the Greeks did not develop any axiomatic system or the concept of a mathematical proof.

    Truly an amazing people, I think they had the greatest impact on world culture, much greater than the Romans, Assirians, Sumerians, Chinese, Japanese or any other old or modern civilization (including the American civilization).

    Sure today's Greeks are not the same as the Ancient Greeks. Nevertheles I feel sad when Modern Greeks are made fun of by other peoples (including Americans).

    By the way I am not Greek or related to any Greek folks.

    1. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So in your world people claim to invent all those things and then make fun of Greeks? Where the hell do you live?

    2. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by manojar · · Score: 1

      only in america!

    3. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by dwandy · · Score: 1
      from tfa:
      The Greeks believed in an earth-centric universe and accounted for celestial bodies' motions using elaborate models based on epicycles, in which each body describes a circle (the epicycle) around a point that itself moves in a circle around the earth. Mr Wright found evidence that the Antikythera mechanism would have been able to reproduce the motions of the sun and moon accurately, using an epicyclic model devised by Hipparchus, and of the planets Mercury and Venus, using an epicyclic model derived by Apollonius of Perga.
      I'm still trying to get my head around the math that would be involved in explaining the shifting orbits for an earth-centric universe...I'm amazed at the lengths to which we go in explaining things around us. This leaves me wondering how many complicated explanations we have today for things that are far more simple. Will one day people ponder in disbelief our current scientific 'facts'?
      --
      If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
    4. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by mrroach · · Score: 1

      What I am wondering is, since they were obviously able to calculate the point that the planets were orbiting, and plot the movement of that point, wouldn't they have noticed that the sun just happened to always occupy that position? If not, I can't imagine why not...

      -Mark

    5. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by liposuction · · Score: 1

      Sure today's Greeks are not the same as the Ancient Greeks. Nevertheles I feel sad when Modern Greeks are made fun of by other peoples (including Americans).

      INCLUDING AMERICANS?!?! NO WAY! NORTH OR SOUTH AMERICA OMGZ WTF?!?

      Also you forgot anyone from the Rhineland area. They make fun of mondern greeks too! ^_^

      --
      "Thoughts are more powerful than any weapon, and I don't even let my people own guns." --Joseph Stalin
    6. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by GungaDan · · Score: 1

      Poor Greeks - always getting reamed.

      --
      Eloi are stupid, throw morlocks at them!
    7. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by Asic+Eng · · Score: 1
      wouldn't they have noticed that the sun just happened to always occupy that position?

      It wouldn't - if the reference point is earth, the position of the sun changes in relation to it. Nevertheless, the theory that the earth is orbiting the sun was also discussed by the ancient Greeks.

    8. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by kutuz_off · · Score: 1

      By the way I am not Greek

      Your first name sounds Greek allright.

    9. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by master_p · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Today's Greeks are exactly the same as the ancient ones from a biological point of view. From a social point of view, though, things are vastly different from what they were back then. There are historical reasons for this (in random order):

      1) 400 years of occupation under Ottoman empire; they missed the renaissance and the industrial revolution. The current Greek state was founded around 1830, yet it is in the first 30 countries when it comes to economic development and standard of living.

      2) 1000 years and more of theocracy in the Byzantine empire. This has had a tremendous effect on demolishing the hellenistic spirit of rational thinking and scientific research that has been the result of over a thousand years of ancient Greek culture. The actual effect of Christianity on this area was to halt development of civilisation for another 1000 years.

      3) the geographical position of Greece: big enemies from the east, big enemies from the west; no chance of survival. Western european countries were much more lucky: the closest enemy was far more away. This allowed western countries to loot Africa and India, thus raising the amount of gold in those countries, and helped making them superpowers.

      As for Americans, Greeks also make fun of them. Greeks consider Americans naive and stupid. Of course there are misunderstandings from both sides. The large number of successful Greek people in the western world (ranging from MIT professors to big enterpreneurs) proves that Greeks are not stupid at all. The poor emigrants of the early 20th century might have been perceived as stupid, though, but back then, Greeks were little more than savages.

      The reason I mentioned above that Greeks today are the same as the ones in Ancient Greece is that the same traits are found in Greece today as in ancient Greece, as those traits are visible in the ancient texts. The most important one is that Greeks are divided, they are constantly fighting against each other, and they are united only when there is an outside danger, as they were in ancient Greece.

      They are the same heros of yesterday (as Hitler said: "Greeks don't fight like heros, heros fight like Greeks"). In the war of 1940, Greece played a very important role in the war against Germans: they managed to stall the German invasion for about 6 months, that was enough for winter to catch them up in the Soviet front.

      They have the same tendency to philosophise about anything...if one participates in a discussion between Greeks (especially educated ones), you will see the same spirit of exploration as in the ancients, as well as the same temper.

      Finally, Greeks are very very competitive, between themselves or with foreigners. They are so competitive, in fact, that everything in Greece can be viewed as a competition. Most of young Greeks are holders of some degree; Greece has the highest percentage of foreign language knowledge, as well as the highest percentage of higher education participants in Europe (the money exported for education purposes to Britain is the highest amongst EU members). They are good in sports (holders of the European cup in soccer and basketball), with many metals in track'n'field; many martial arts categories are dominated by Greeks. Greek sport clubs are part of the few clubs around the world that have top successes in almost every sport. The Greek navy seals are amongst the top 3 around the world (along with the British and the Israelis). Greek fighter pilots are consistently recognized as the best, as they have won lots of international competitions. The spirit of competition is carried from the ancient times: sports where practically born in Greece.

    10. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by danheretic · · Score: 1
      ...the US and other Western countries claim to have invented much later. Everything from democracy, theater, architecture, clocks, mechanical toys, Hero's heat engines, sport competitions, etc.

      Obligatory US bashing? The US doesn't claim to have invented any of those items; in most cases publicly acknowledging that the source or inspiration for those things comes mainly from ancient Greeks. (Source: All of my History classes in the U.S.)

      They are the fathers of mathematics,

      Well, except for what they got from the Indians, Arabs, Chinese and Egyptians.

      Now don't get me wrong, the ancient Greek culture was truly spectacular in many ways, and definitely laid the formative base for many of the Western world's scientific, political and cultural views for thousands of years. I personally have a high admiration for their culture and intelligence.

      By the way I am American, though my grandmother was full Greek.

    11. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by caudron · · Score: 1

      had many things the US and other Western countries claim to have invented

      Not to be mean or anything, but what world do you live in? Every American Schoolkid knows what the Greeks gave us. It's common knowledge that our government was based in part on Greek ideas, like those that came from Plato's Republic. In Virginia, this is an SOL for the 3rd grade, meaning that the average 8 yr old has passed a test on the topic and is aware of the value that ancient Greece has to us now.

      I appreciate you wanted to make all this clear, but your post makes it sound like it wasn't already well known. The Greeks and the Hebrews gave more to the Western World than any other two peoples without question.

      Ancient Chinese and Egyptians had bits and pieces of mathematical knowledge but they failed to grasp the big picture

      Here you are going a bit too far, I think. Perhaps your comment is true about the Egyptians, but the Chinese were every bit as innovative and amazing as the Greeks, and every bit as influential to the Eastern worls as the Greeks were to the West.

      I feel sad when Modern Greeks are made fun of by other peoples

      You shouldn't. We all make fun of each other. It's OK. It's just friendly kidding. I've never heard anyone joke the modern Greeks that wasn't really just playing around. Really though, I almost never hear anyone joking about the modern Greeks. Frankly, they are pretty quiet on the international front, so they aren't mentioned that often in America, in my experience...maybe you live somewhere where nationalism runs higher than the norm and or peoples are regularly insulted. That would make me pretty sad too. Here in Virginia, however, it don't see any of that.

      --
      -Tom
    12. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrogance. Thinking that Earth was the centre of the solar system. And that they were in the middle... Naturally the world and the solar system revolved around them...

    13. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      It wasn't Hitler who said that. "Today We Say That Greeks Fight Like Heroes, From Now On We Will Say That Heroes Fight Like Greeks", Winston Churchill Hitler was too pissed my Mussolini's "fiasko" defeat in Albania by the Greeks and the fact that he was delayed more than a month in the northern Greek borderline, to try to come up with smart sentences like that. The delay caused by the ill-equipped Greek army was long enough to add more than one month of harsh winter to their campaign in Russia. Some ppl argue it has decicively changed the course of the war. I am not sure about that, but it definitely was much more contribution than the one by the French and Scandinavians combined... :). Who would have thought that the Metaxa line would hold much more than the Maginot line (yes yes...i know that Nazis cut through the Ardennes Forest)?

    14. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      It wasn't Hitler who said that. "Today We Say That Greeks Fight Like Heroes, From Now On We Will Say That Heroes Fight Like Greeks", Winston Churchill Hitler was too pissed my Mussolini's "fiasko" defeat in Albania by the Greeks and the fact that he was delayed more than a month in the northern Greek borderline, to try to come up with smart sentences like that. The delay caused by the ill-equipped Greek army was long enough to add more than one month of harsh winter to their campaign in Russia. Some ppl argue it has decicively changed the course of the war. I am not sure about that, but it definitely was much more contribution than the one by the French and Scandinavians combined... :). Who would have thought that the Metaxa line would hold much longer than the Maginot line (yes yes...i know that Nazis cut through the Ardennes Forest)? Greeks offered a lot to the world civilization, however the contributions of Chinese, Indian, Arabs, Hebrew, the European renaissance and so many other's should not be ignored and understated. And one should not forget of the the vastly greater contributions of today's scientists in US, Europe, Asia and elsewhere.

    15. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am (half) Greek and I am related to Greek folks. And I can tell you Modern Greeks are about as close to Ancient Greeks as Americans would be. The reason that Modern Greeks are so easy to make fun of is that they are about as far from Ancient Greeks as you can imagine: superstitious, obnoxious, uneducated, uncultured, I could go on for days. But they sure do know how to throw a great party!

    16. Re:Ancient Greece vs the US by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Also note that it was taken as axiomatic that the heavens were perfect and that therefor the planets had to move at constant speed in perfect circles. Thus epicycles.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  30. Beware of geeks bearing gifts... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long before someone writes a Trojan horse for it?

  31. My computer's just a glorified watch too... by Errandboy+of+Doom · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, I also use it to read /. But the watch part is far more productive.

  32. Re:FIRST P0ST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ya! Damn the man! Seize your destiny!

  33. Ptolomy's Almagest - first programming spec? by Captain+Sensible · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My guess is that its an analogue conputer, but there is a good chance that its a clock.

    If you are familiar with Ptolemy's "Almagest" you know he models the solar system as a series of epicycles. Until Copernicus' time (and after) European and Arab teaching was that these mechanisms were the physical reality but Ptolomy never actually endorsed that view. What if the "Almagest" was the specs for a dedicated astronomical computer and the Antikythera mechanism is the implimentation?

    Then again...clocks became simpler over the centuries. Our modern clocks only show hours, minutes, seconds and perhaps the date. Mediaeval clocks showed years, months, weeks, days and hours as well as planetary positions, seasons, and solar and lunar eclipses. Their mechanisms were more complex than mechanical clocks and watches (remember them?) produced in the 20th century. Mechanical clocks built in the 1970s were more accurate but less complex than mechanical clocks built in the 1270s in Europe. Clocks built in earlier centuries in Arab lands were equally complex. The Antikythera mechanism could have been just one in a line of astronomical clocks.

    1. Re:Ptolomy's Almagest - first programming spec? by necrostopheles · · Score: 1

      Except the wiki article linked to in the post says the Antikythera mechanism dates from 87BC. Another wiki article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almagest puts the Almagest at CE 150. That has the implementation preceding the specification by almost 240 years.

    2. Re:Ptolomy's Almagest - first programming spec? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, happens with my code all the time! Though I guess the lag time usually isn't THAT high!

      You knew that one had to be coming. ;)

  34. imagine, if you will, by weighn · · Score: 1

    ...a Beowulf cluster of these...

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  35. old news by kahrytan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This might be old news but it is just a reminder that people from ancient times were not stupid. The people around Mediterranean were smart and understand how things work.

    Also make note of Heron of Alexandria. A great Greek inventor who invented machine gun, steam power, vending machine and many other mechanical machines.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hero_of_Alexandria

    --
    \
  36. That proves it by tsa · · Score: 1

    All these adventure games with ancient mechanical things --- I always knew that wasn't fantasy.

    Pity there are no pictures in the Article.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  37. OT: Re:Dupe by Kinky+Bass+Junk · · Score: 1

    I believe you can only coin a phrase if you explain to people what exactly that term means. Otherwise it's just an expression in words/sound ;)

    --
    Anonymous Coward
  38. Clockwork virii? by Errandboy+of+Doom · · Score: 1

    Funny, but raises an interesting question: could a clockwork device have security flaws?

    1. Re:Clockwork virii? by Shano · · Score: 1

      While it's fiction, Pratchett managed to put security holes in a mechanical device in Thud! (well, it's a DoS attack, really). Given an appropriate state and sequence of inputs, the whole device literally locks up. It's a relatively unimportant point, so not really spoiler material.

      In some ways, a clockwork device is more susceptible to such attacks - a computer just has to be rebooted, while the clockwork device can be physically destroyed.

      As far as I know, nobody's made a real-life clockwork device complex enough to have security flaws, though.

  39. Other Greek versions of the Antikythera mechanism by macshune · · Score: 5, Funny

    If the Antikythera mechanism was made by different outfits in ancient Greece:

    Apollo: The mechanism would be highly polished in a mahogany box with an observation window that would crack due to poor workmanship and high profit margins. Device only works within a 10 sq. mile area around Athens. Anywhere else and it's off.

    Microsofticus: The mechanism would be essentially the same as the original, except some planets would be in different locations for 'efficiency' and 'because it runs faster that way.' Pebbles would bounce into the device via conspicuous holes and users would have to purchase a security contract from Symanticus. Not recorded in historical literature because nobody knew how it worked. Re-assembly from rusty bits required legions of scientists.

    Zeus Microsystems: The mechanism would be painted purple and lilac and probably have some confetti around a highly stylized Sun logo on the outside. Giant purple globe in center of device would confound scientists for decades. Works, but gets slower with every passing decade, even though the underlying architecture is salvagable.

    Linux Maximus: Device was buried with engineering diagrams in air-tight, humidity-controlled box at Delphi. Instructions for re-assembly (which it doesn't need) are also recorded within the device itself in every language known at the time as well as with pictures. Does what it needs to do and little else. Also, device was heavily cited in the historical literature and anyone was free to build one as long as they had access to commmodity blacksmith parts. Can be modified to suit different galactic locations, as well, with little effort.

    Hewletticus-Packardus: Originally a papyrus-ink outfit, H.P., decided to get into the astronomy business because its archon, Sappho, wanted to. Ended up building poor version and purchased Compacticus to try and fix things. Didn't happen and Sappho went to Lesbos to become a poet with a zillion Drachma severence pay and H.P. just had to deal.

  40. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wireless. Less space then a Nomad. Lame.

  41. I'm not sure since I usually don't RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was the first time I noticed it too, but I remember an article on the wikipedia - I think after a /., it was about the commodore64 and the article body was hacked, yet so appropriately highly informative.
    It was something like: [Teh elite computar numbar 1!!] and some other stuff. haha. I loved it.
    When I reloaded there was a whole page of 'real' article, the condensed version was so much better, well, if you already knew about the c64....

  42. Next, do the Shroud of Turin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Found" in an unverifiable location, check.

    Mysterious properties steeped in legend or too advanced for time period, check.

    Fudged "reconstruction" based on second-hand (instrumental) data, check.

    All the earmarks of a hoax. Nothing to see here, move along.

  43. MOD PARENT FUNNY by ShakiirNvar · · Score: 1

    ROFL, IMO the parent post should be modded funny :)

    --
    "Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public." - HL Mencken
  44. Ouch... by Kickboy12 · · Score: 1

    I can see the smoke coming from the wikipedia servers from here. Damn.

  45. Those pirates... by cammoblammo · · Score: 2, Funny

    So they've copied a several thousand year old computer, software and hardware. Surely there's a lawsuit there somewhere.

    --

    Cogito, ergo sig.

    1. Re:Those pirates... by slashnik · · Score: 1

      I think that Microsoft have got a patent on interlocking gear trains.

    2. Re:Those pirates... by cammoblammo · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder... is Greece in the EU?

      --

      Cogito, ergo sig.

    3. Re:Those pirates... by antoy · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    4. Re:Those pirates... by wikinerd · · Score: 1

      Greece is in the EU from 1981, joined just after UK. Spain joined in 1986. Sweden and Finland joined in 1995.

    5. Re:Those pirates... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the Dilbert comic when the PHB mentions that their blueprint or flowchart or something looks like Egyptian hieroglyphs, forces Dilbert to investigate possible copyright threats from ancient Egyptians, and then asks why all their projects take so long.

  46. Oblig. Server Comment by Mr.Progressive · · Score: 1

    Looks like Wikipedia's servers are hosted on the Antikythera...

    --
    Okay, so a philosopher, a philologist, and a philatelist walk into a bar...
  47. Greek or geek? by Plaid+Phantom · · Score: 2, Funny

    statues lying on the seabed that made the greatest impression on him. He returned to the surface, removed his helmet, and gabbled that he had found a heap of dead, naked women.

    A computer AND pr0n? They need to check their spellings. This was most certainly a geek ship, not a Greek ship.

    --
    All comments are properties and trademarks of the voices in my head. Not like I'm gonna claim them.
  48. Re:Greek computer reconstruction images by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't copy and paste personal bookmarks here.

  49. Ancient greek UPS by Muhammar · · Score: 1

    2 backup dudes at the crankshaft.

    (The audio output used master-slave speaker configuration)

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  50. The real question is, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    does it run UT 2004BC?

  51. To all the vandals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This article has recently been linked from Slashdot.
    Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism."

    Has anybody noticed this? :-)

  52. Re:FIRST P0ST! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear Cowboy Neil, Cmdr Taco, or anonymous code ranger,

    Please add "first post" to the lameness filter. That would really be everso nice. Even if it only leads directly to "first post" alterations whereby the first poster leads a series of text dances to cover up the fact that he is posting first ..oh, nevermind

  53. Wikipedia by ultranova · · Score: 1

    From Wikipedia:

    This article has recently been linked from Slashdot.
    Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.

    Isn't it nice knowing that Slashdot has such a nice reputation ?

    But, to get on topic: How is this a computer ? It can't be programmed, it doesn't have a memory or anything. It is simply a mechanical astronomical clock. An impressive clock, certainly, but that does not make it a computer.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    1. Re:Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it nice knowing that Slashdot has such a nice reputation ?

      Indeed. Check the edit history of the article; it is full of recent vandalism by obvious slashdot trolls. Next time, the wiki community will simply block all edits to an article that was recently linked form Slashdot.org for a few days. Or refuse hyperlinks from Slashdot. Troll wars on Slashdot are a bit of net folklore, but we should really keep this piece of fun to ourselves. Wiki vandals are asshats, pure and simple. Shoot on sight!

      But, to get on topic: How is this a computer ? It can't be programmed, it doesn't have a memory or anything. It is simply a mechanical astronomical clock. An impressive clock, certainly, but that does not make it a computer.

      It sure isn't a "computer", but it was an amazing step on the path to modern computing.

    2. Re:Wikipedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A computer is something used to, well, compute. Hence its name, "compute-er". And this is a computer by definition -- though probably not a Turing Machine (which is what most modern computers are).

  54. Greek Gods making clockwork owls.... by interactive_civilian · · Score: 4, Funny
    Heh...the Greek Gods were making clockwork owls, ancient computers, bags that could hold the winds, winged sandals, etc...

    ...And all the Christians got was a carpenter.

    Helluva nice guy, though.

    .

    Sorry. Seemed a little Monty Python-esque.

    Good-bye, sweet karma.

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    1. Re:Greek Gods making clockwork owls.... by eam · · Score: 1

      You must not be a home owner. I'd kill for a good, trustworthy carpenter.

      The only thing better would be if the messiah was a plumber.

    2. Re:Greek Gods making clockwork owls.... by Wavicle · · Score: 1

      I'd kill for a good, trustworthy carpenter.

      WWJD?!

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
    3. Re:Greek Gods making clockwork owls.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, you'd kill, but how? Are you willing to crucify?

  55. Great error messages, though. by interactive_civilian · · Score: 1
    Blue Tablet of Death, anyone?

    **Ripped shamelessly from the Fark headline.**

    But, it still gets a better Doom 3 framerate than a Dual G5 PowerMac. :p

    **Ripped shamelessly from my own comment on Fark.**

    disclaimer: I am a Mac User.

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
    1. Re:Great error messages, though. by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1

      I was reading through a few of the core dumps, but it's all Greek to me.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  56. That device is pretty fucking cool by Neuroelectronic · · Score: 0

    I just had to say that

  57. Well being a two thousand year old computer... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    The patent on the design just expired. Still waiting for the copyright to expire though...

  58. Aristarchus of Samos and Heliocentrism by wikinerd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The linked Economist article says that ancient Greeks (I am Greek) believed in a universe where Earth was at its centre. I don't agree with that. Geocentrism was the most accepted theory, but not all Greeks believed it. There were Heliocentrists in ancient Greece. Search Google for Greek and Heliocentrism and see what you can find. Learn about Aristarchus of Samos.

    1. Re:Aristarchus of Samos and Heliocentrism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything comes from the Greek!

  59. greek computer by manojar · · Score: 0, Troll

    does it have a wide-open backdoor?

  60. Saw it in the Archeological Museum in Athens by Betabug · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've spent an afternoon in the Archaeological Museum in Athens and without knowing the story stumbled upon this thing (no mention of the "clock/computer" in the weblog post though). It is impressive to look at, among the other ancient stuff it has an otherworldly air, it's not impressive in the sense of how big or complex it looks. Of course you can't see that much from the object itself, but I can imagine that people first looked at it and noticed that there is something really unusual about gears appearing in something so old.

    The bronze exhibition also has other fine worked small stuff (and the gold stuff exhibition has even smaller and more detailed worked stuff), so I give the old Greeks the ability to work on this level. Perhaps not your neighbourhood blacksmith, but some experts were definitely able to do this level of work.

  61. Antikethyra mechanism and programmability by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    Some folks think that all computers ought to be programmable. That's plain wrong. A non-programmable device can be a computer. The Antikethyra mechanism isn't simple and is definitely an ancient Greek computer, probably built in Rhodes island.

  62. Ancient Greek planetaria by wikinerd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ancient Greeks (I am Greek) had built complete moving planetaria from before 212 BCE. They had the knowledge and the technology to predict and actually show the movements of all planets they knew about. Ancient Greeks also had simple small steam engines and pumps.

  63. X-Ray company involved... by xgarb · · Score: 1

    The X-ray company involved is http://www.xtekxray.com/ in case anyone is interested. (Yes I work for them)

  64. Re:Other Greek versions of the Antikythera mechani by myram · · Score: 1

    The "-us"-suffix on device names would imply that it was Roman - not Greek. Ie. Linusoupoulos, Microsofoulas et cetera.

    --
    -.-
  65. Oh, look... by WheelDweller · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There's a webpage telling me that Microsoft doesn't support that any more. :)

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
  66. How Wikipedia views slashdotians... by lucason · · Score: 1

    What the hell!

    --- As mentioned on wikipedia ---
    This article has recently been linked from Slashdot.
    Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.
    ---

    How did slashdotians get that rep? Why does Wikipedia think Slashdotians would want to vandalise their pages. Or more to the point.. Why does wikipedia think that Slashdotians that would want to vandalise Wikipedia, would actually WAIT until there is a hyperlink from slashdot in order to do so??

    1. Re:How Wikipedia views slashdotians... by Skater · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Vandals go for max exposure. Thus when the link is on /., it's going to get a lot of exposure, thereby increasing the attractiveness of vandalizing the page.

      By the same token, no one tags the inside of railroad cars...

    2. Re:How Wikipedia views slashdotians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? You've obviously never riden inside a New York City subway car, have you?

    3. Re:How Wikipedia views slashdotians... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      "How did slashdotians get that rep? "

      By observation by people who maintain Wikipedia. They know it's not all /.ers. It's probably some of the same people who endlessly troll here.

      If you spend a minute or two with Google, you'll see that at least one person posted instructions on /. for easy vandalism of Wikipedia. I'm not going to post the link to that, and if anyone does find it, please don't post it, and please don't follow the instructions and vandalize Wikipedia.

      Other people have posted on /. the reasons why they vandalize Wikipedia.

      In a community of this size, there will be some bad eggs. And Wikipedia having a warning that there is a correlation between /. links to them, and false or vandalized information... well, that's just good policy.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    4. Re:How Wikipedia views slashdotians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      re: How did slashdotians get that rep?

      Take a look at the edit log for that entry since it was /.ed. Some of our own have been doing some terrible Wikipedia vandalism, and even more seriously unfunny stuff. It makes me almost ashamed to be a slashdotter!

      Obviously we deserve the bad rep. Why don't those of us who are responsible just grow up already, and then perhaps we won't have other sites shaking in their booties when we link them?

    5. Re:How Wikipedia views slashdotians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember it is not just people who post here and are part of the community, but passive users who click on the link to this article through RSS, other link sites (like Fark), etc...and then follow that link to Wikipedia. Basically they think it is funny to put personal information, introduce inaccuracies, scream obscenities, whatever you can think of in an article and it is damned frustrating working on something and then have a user who will go to that page at a moment where one of those things appears, see the vandalism, and think less of Wikipedia. Sorry for the rant...

      -IR

  67. It's an ANALOG computer, and Feynman's dubious by Ancient_Hacker · · Score: 1

    Yes, it's a computer, an analog computer. Before there were digital computers, a whole big heapin canful of computation was done with slide-rules, nomographs, sextants, and other devices that COMPUTED answers using mechanical (proportional) means. And Richard Feynman was mighty dubious about this device-- is it likely that just one of these survived all that time? And they'd be useless for navigation in the Mediterranean-- you need a very accurate clock to compute longitude, which didnt come about til the late 1700's. And navigation in the Med is mostly about longitude.

  68. Re:Other Greek versions of the Antikythera mechani by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

    Let's not forget about the lesser-known models:

    Beos: The device can easily display data for several solar systems at once. Unfortunately, at that time no one needed that functionality.

    "Zeta": The device got its name from the fact that it appears to be a Beos device with the letter Zeta and the words "new and improved" painted on the case. For some reason a Teutonic mail-order merchant seemed to be the only distributor.

    Netbsd: The strange spelling is seen as proof that this device was originally developed in eastern Europe. Known to work with any kind of cog imaginable. There are several scriptures in which a certain Netcraftos confirms that "Netbsd is dying".

    Ostenos: Experts are still arguing whether this device should be called "Ostenos" or "Osexos". But everyone agrees that it's really pretty.

    Mesdos: While somewhat clunky, many of the older Greek scriptures confirm that it was, in fact, much superior to the Windos offering of the time, which is often described as "just a pretty shell". They also explain in great detail how one can modify the starting configuration of the cogwheels in order to get as much as possible from than the first 640 rotations of the main cog (also known as conventional rotations).

    Windos 3.1: An addon to Mesdos. Mainly acts as a pretty shell that makes the box slower for some reason. Comes with a pupular card game that can only be used in conjunction with the machine, further lowering productivity.

    Windos 95: Got its name from the fact that there was a 95% chance of the device breaking when used due to the fact that everything was made from small glass windows. Known to leak blue ink from time to time.

    Windos NT: Based on technology sto-- innovated from Stonehenge, this mechanism is known to be rock solid but incompatible with many common celestial bodies of its time.

    Windos ME: The less known about this one the better.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  69. Re: MOD PARENT UP FUNNY by magicchex · · Score: 1

    The funniest thing I've read on here in days (not saying much but it's something!)

    --
    How many fulltime jobs can one man have?
  70. Tide Predictors by dmaxwell · · Score: 1

    http://www.bartleby.com/30/16.html

    Go down to figure 133. Around the turn of the century, there were devices even more elaborate than that one.

  71. First Geek Computer? by se7en11 · · Score: 1
    Did any one else read this as "First Geek Computer Reconstructed"? I thought for sure my grand grandpappy would be on the front page. He's the geek of all geeks....wait....er....no...he's just Greek.

    Nothing to see here. Move along.

  72. Paging Neal Stephenson! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And just about every author who seizes upon the latest geek meme to sell a few more novels...

    Yeah, I'm a tad cynical.

  73. Those crazy Greeks! by kurbchekt · · Score: 0

    Apparently, it wasn't thousands of years under the sea that caused the Antikythera mechanism to deteriorate. It BSOD'd when Microsoft Word tried to determine if "cleverer" was a real word, and Archimedes threw it threw out of his hotel window.

  74. Geek Computer? by Ruvim · · Score: 0

    Aren't all computers are geek in nature?

  75. Potential Patent Issues? by Ruvim · · Score: 0

    Since this technology clearly pre-dates any current PC patent, whouldn't it render some of those patents invalid, since it is an example of the earlier design? Or will it be dissmissed just as Mickey Mouse ancient drawings were?

  76. Kent Brockman by Viking+Coder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kent Brockman: I, for one, welcome our new Greek overlords.

    Kent Brockman (listens to earpiece)

    Kent Brockman: This just in, the classical Greek civilization fell thousands of years ago. And I, for one, welcome back our Republican overlords.

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  77. Computer Model Proves GeoCentric Universe by HighOrbit · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Blind Faith in Science Beware, because valid science can give wrong results. Valid reproducable observations that lead to a hypothesis and valid proven predictions does not make it "true". Based upon the Article, the Greeks used this to *accurately* predict the positions of planets. This meets all four steps of our modern scientific method.
    • 1. Observation and description of a phenomenon or group of phenomena. The Greeks see the planets, moon, and sun move across the sky
    • 2. Formulation of an hypothesis to explain the phenomena. The Greeks form a geo-centric hypothosis "in which each body describes a circle (the epicycle) around a point that itself moves in a circle around the earth"
    • 3. Use of the hypothesis to predict the existence of other phenomena, or to predict quantitatively the results of new observations. The Greeks build a mental model of the universe to predict where the the heavenly bodies will be in the sky and then build a device (computer model) that will execute their prediction.
    • 4. Performance of experimental tests of the predictions by several independent experimenters and properly performed experiments. The Greeks can run the machine over and over and every time come up with a reasonably accurate prediction that can be verified by going back and seeing that the phenomena conforms to the prediction of the computer model

    So, does this mean that a geocentric universe was "proven" by science in the 1st century BC? We would say that was absurd because we have more information about the universe now than the Greeks had from just looking skyward. But how many other computer models and predictions do we take on faith as "science" which are based on incomplete information. Our best global warming climate models are extemely *inaccurate* compared to this relatively accurate device. Yet we accept the inaccurate model on faith and reject the accurate model that this device "proves".

    What this device show is that you can have completely valid "science" and still be completely wrong because your information is almost never complete. Throw in some preconceptions, political or cultural prejudices, and the selective observations that are part of the human nature of the scientists and the the "science" is even more skewed.

    And no, its not just "acient" science that is wrong. Roughly 20 years ago every medical scientist *knew* that stomach ulcers were caused by stress. Then some crackpot came along and suggested they were caused by a bacterial infection. The crackpot couldn't even get approval to run tests, so he experimented on himself. A few weeks ago that crackpot won the Nobel Prize. So how many of our accpeted "truths" are wrong?
    1. Re:Computer Model Proves GeoCentric Universe by Skjellifetti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You make a very interesting point although I disagree completely with your statement that "we accept the inaccurate model [global warming] on faith and reject the accurate model that this device "proves"."

      Neither scientist nor scientific process accepts models based on faith. Current theories in science are always based on best-fit models of the observable facts. No scientist claims that new models won't supplant older theories as newer, better, more accurate observations are made. But the burden of proof when claiming a theory is wrong is on the scientist with the new idea or new observation. He must show why the new observation is relevent and why the current theory fails to account for the new observation. This keeps real crackpots (e.g. intelligent design advocates) at bay while eventually accepting the good ideas (e.g. Warren and Marshall's ulcer theory). Yes, this can often take awhile and the process is subject to the many frailties of humans. But overall, the process works quite well.

      And your post should not have been modded off-topic.

  78. You forgot one thing the Greeks invented by Lady+Jazzica · · Score: 1

    The Greeks also invented the kimono. Kimono is come from the Greek word himona, is mean winter. So, what do you wear in the wintertime to stay warm? A robe. You see: robe, kimono.

    1. Re:You forgot one thing the Greeks invented by Paul+Rose · · Score: 1

      :)

      Give me a word, any word, and I show you that the root of that word is Greek.

  79. A common lament for us old 'hackers' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You poor unfortunate kids today. Why, when I was young...

    You could build useful fun projects out of discrete transistors.
    (Tubes also, if you were a real masochist...)
    Then some early ICs came along that were still useful. Transistor hybrids (no more taking hundreds of curves to get a matched set for that class B amp!), VCOs, timers. Still the sort of 'stuff' you could hold in your hands and solder. Building an analog synthesizer was within reach (no Moog, but still quite fun) Then the IC age really ramped up. Soon you had op amps, then quad op amps. Parts got smaller, then became surface mount. Then (gasp!) BGA appeared. Oh farc! Plus for me, the (eh hem) age of bifocals arrived. Just for fun, I recently fully disassembled my Creative Zen Touch. Wow, nice design and packaging. What a beast to hack!

    I now understand the recent return to people designing and building discrete power amps for home stereo. (Sorry people, but I still do not get tubes (valves)...) At least you can go back to working on something where you can touch the parts. About the only thing left to hack on modern toys are the connectors and protocols.

    So were the ancient Greeks pure genious for the longevity of their technology? No. It has more to do with the technology being inherently long lived and accessible at a human level. Also, this particulat piece of history managed to sit where no one could reach it for a long time. I have to assume that there were other models on land that were recycled for their raw materials quite some time ago. I disassembled my synth to recover the controls....

  80. Re:Other Greek versions of the Antikythera mechani by PhraudulentOne · · Score: 0

    Buzzkill.

    --
    You create your own reality - Leave mine to me.
  81. How many truths are wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About half of them. Think about it.

    Science is all about the scientific method.
    Until the data and results are ALL in, you don't have the answer.
    You step from conjecture to hypothesis to theory.

    Global warming is happening, by the way, but whether it is a result
    of human activity is still conjecture.

    The rest of your blasting away at science? I call BS......

    1. Re:How many truths are wrong? by HighOrbit · · Score: 1
      The rest of your blasting away at science? I call BS.....
      I'm not blasting away at science. If I am blasting away at anything, it is people who claim they have the final and definative answer with "Science proves....." and then they close their minds, when all they really have is inaccurate and incomplete models.
  82. Windows by crashcodesdotcom · · Score: 1

    It was designed for use on a Wind Blown Operating System.

  83. article is dated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sep 19th 2002

  84. Ancient porn found on ancient Greek computer by elrous0 · · Score: 1
    World never to think of Socrates the same way again.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  85. IPod by NotFamous · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hear the Ipod's thumbwheel navigation patent is now endangered by prior art...

    --
    Some settling may occur during posting.
    1. Re:IPod by Mhtsos · · Score: 1

      We won't sue until we clear that trademark business with Amazon

  86. "Technopolis"... by jbarr · · Score: 1

    OK, this may be off topic, but does anyone else find the word "Technopolis" to be really cool? It has a great blend of ancient and modern all in one...

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  87. Did it Have a Spinning Beachball of Death? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If so, that's probably why the greeks threw it in the sea.

    This ancient computer probably would have blown the drive bay doors off every Apple g4 i've ever owned. God help me.

  88. Um...small correction by caudron · · Score: 1

    That's GNU/Antikythera if you please.

    --
    -Tom
  89. Re:Other Greek versions of the Antikythera mechani by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

    There were 163 people known in 43 BC to distribute their own version of the Linux Maximus, all doing something slightly different. If you want one that does exactly what you want, get a dozen of them, and change parts from one to the other. Then distribute and become number 164.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  90. Longitude Determination by skeptictank · · Score: 3, Informative
    Here is a link to an article about how the device could have been used to replace tables for determining longitude.

    http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/Spr ing03/Antikythera.html

  91. binary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's all greek to me

  92. wicked wooden shoebox mod case with knobs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notice the Greek amazing intellect:

    No 'Designed for Windows'
    or 'Intel Inside' badges on the case!

  93. But can I put Linux on it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe port Quake?

  94. Wikipedia strikes back by Spunk · · Score: 1

    There's a new box at the top of the article:

    This article has recently been linked from Slashdot.
    Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism.

    They know us too well :)

  95. Best-Fit Models by HighOrbit · · Score: 1

    I completely agree with you that a good scientist knows that new theories "supplant older theories as newer, better, more accurate observations are made". Good science always accepts a certain healthly level of uncertainty and provisionalness. However, there are a lot people who forget that and then go on to make far reaching claims and absolute conclusions based on "scientific" computer models. I cringe when somebody with an agenda (political, scientific, social) says "We *must* immediately do $action because scientists have proven $dramatic_result by conducting $flawed_computer_model"

    My illustrative point about Global Warming is that when the hypothosis was formed about 10-15 years ago, the computer models gave certain predictions of where global temperatures would be now. Those predictions were wildly inaccurate. Granted, newer models used today are more complex and contain more data than the old models, but given the long lead time of observations, we can have no more confidence in their accurancy than the ten year old models. These models haven't even risen to the level of "best-fit" for accurately describing or predicting phenomena. Yet, you have people running around spouting off about such-and-such computer models predicts so-and-so. Because the models are unproven (and indeed, the immediate anticedants that they modify were shown to be wildly wrong) their trust of the anthropogenic warming models equates to little more than "faith" under color of science.

    The Antikythera device is based on the theory of Geocentrism. It uses Geocentrism to make predictions that are correct everytime. We only know geocentrism to be flat-out wrong because of other observations and insights that we have gained in the last 500 years since Nicalaus Copernicus, Tyco Brahe, and Johannes Kepler. However, if we were in the 1st Century BC with the available information at the time, we would have had more scientific evidence of geocentrism then, than what we have for anthropogenic global warming today.

    I think that is a cautionary tale.

  96. Sometimes late at night... by Safe+Sex+Goddess · · Score: 1

    Sometimes late at night I wonder if I'm a modern reinvocation of a Greek Goddess.

    --
    Abstinence is a government conspiracy. www.SafeSexZone.co
  97. My ancestors ... by sdanis · · Score: 1

    were writing philosophy while yours were swinging from trees ...

    1. Re:My ancestors ... by slcdb · · Score: 1

      Did you rip this off straight from Eddie Izzard, or from some place else?

      --
      Despite what EULAs say, most software is sold, not licensed.
    2. Re:My ancestors ... by sdanis · · Score: 1

      Some place else ...

  98. Greek culture lighting to the nations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a book called "Oi Ellhnikes Leksies Sthn Agglikh Glwssa"(The Greek words in the English language) for those that read modern Greek. THe 1991 earlier edition has 398 pages, a newer edition published in 2004 has 669 pages(which I do not own).

    As to the continuity of the Greeks of course the modern are not ancient Greeks. But the beliefs of many Westerners that Greek is a dead language(thus Greeks a dead people), making it ok to teach Erasmic pronounciation is condescending to say the least. The modern demotic Greek language is the direct descendant of Koine Greek and most modern Greeks can understand most the New Testament's vocabulary.

    The most amazing thing about the ancient Greeks is that they wrote about everything and did nearly everything. That is almost all ideas and politics like communism, monarchism, socialism, anarchism, algebra, trigonometry, can be found in their munificience.

  99. If someone can operate it by geekoid · · Score: 1

    to get an answer to a problem, without needing to understand the problem, then it's a computer.

    the fact that you didn't plug it into a wall, and that it only had on purpose is irrelevant.

    It is also important to rememebr that anything built with software can be built with hardware. Not as practical, but it can be done.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  100. Intellectual Property Claim by Project2501a · · Score: 0

    Dear Sirs,

    My name is Yiannis Papadopoulos, I am a laywer and I come from the City of Antiketheria in Greece. I believe your beowulf clusters of linux and computer fans and well your entire western civilazation infridges on my ancestors intellectual property rights.

    We cannot tell you at the time the exact technologies you westerners infridge on, because we do not trust that you will not change them.

    This is a notice to seize and deceipt all activities of the Western Civilazation infridging on the technology of the Ancient Greeks. If you do not comply, I will have to seek legal ways of protecting my clients' rights.

    Thank you

    Yiannis Papadopoulos, IAAL

    --
    ----
  101. Chinese are adopting the Greek ways or else by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So that is why we are counting the years from the Chinese Calendar? Or from the religion with the New Testament as its basis which of course was written in Greek. Aristeides Konstantides has published a 669 dictionary tome of all the Greek words in the English language.

    Here are some of the Greek prefixes used in English: acanth(o), achromat(o), acr(o), actin(i/o), aden(o), aer(o), alg(o) ... I could go on.

    Is our architecture based on the Chinese or the Greek? Heck even the Chinese have adopted the Greek ways(architecture, calendar, Greek loan words from West European languages).

    1. Re:Chinese are adopting the Greek ways or else by caudron · · Score: 1

      Heck even the Chinese have adopted the Greek ways(architecture, calendar, Greek loan words from West European languages).

      I just left China 2 weeks ago. No they are not. Hong Kong is, buit Hong Kong was a British Colony for a century. They are quite westernized. The rest? It's a COMPLETELY different world, dude. The architecture is utterly foreign to the West. The Calendar referenced by the people of China is the Chinese one (which, in fact, caused me a funny bit of confusion while I was there). The western "loan words" are limited to "Bye Bye" and "OK", neither of which have a Greek root.

      Which brings me to the next point:

      Here are some of the Greek prefixes used in English: acanth(o), achromat(o), acr(o), actin(i/o), aden(o), aer(o), alg(o) ... I could go on.

      No, you couldn't. You could continue to copy and paste for the Greek online dictionary, maybe, but that's about it. I, however, can speak Koine Greek, the Greek used in the New Testement.

      Which brings me to the NEXT point:

      Or from the religion with the New Testament as its basis which of course was written in Greek.

      I have a degree in religious studies. The religion of the New Testement was distinctly Hebrew with some nod toward Hellenized Rome (ie, the Greek-speaking Roman Empire). With the exception of the Gospel of Luke, the hellenization of the New Testemant is pretty much limited to the written language and a few parables that reference Greek mythemes for purposes of reaching a different audience. The Theology and the ideas underlying it DO NOT have origins in Greco-Roman philosophy or religion. Even Luke's hellenized influence is not so great, just greater than the other writers of the NT.

      Is our architecture based on the Chinese or the Greek?

      OURS is based on the English and French, primarily, neither of which owe much in that specific regard to the Greeks. Your house has marble columns? Mine doesn't. I think one house in my whole neighborhood does. It's pretty ugly. Either way, you should actually READ what I said before replying with your dick-voice. I said the East was as influenced by the Chinese as the West was by the Greeks. We are the West, meanign that I already said we were influenced by the Greeks. But places like Japan, Korea, India, etc., are equally influenced by the Chinese, not the Greeks.

      --
      -Tom
  102. Terrible article. Photograph ????? by zymano · · Score: 1

    Great , they posted a photo of the original machine.

  103. Are we really such a group of miscreants? by wcanevari · · Score: 1

    Notice the banner at the top of the page? This article has recently been linked from Slashdot. Please keep an eye on the page history for errors or vandalism Is Wikipiedia so vulnerable?.....

  104. WikiPlagiarism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    The article in the Economist, linked from the Slashdot summary, is clearly cribbed from the Wikipedia entry that immediately preceeded its publication (or a common ancestor). Just look for common phrases like "an ancient Greek tradition of complex mechanical technology". Neither the Wikipedia nor the Economist stories are definitively attributed, so perhaps they are the work of a single author. But more likely the Economist just stole the IP from Wikipedia without giving credit to its actual author.

    --

    --
    make install -not war