Slashdot Mirror


Google and Oregon Launch Open Source Initiative

* * Beatles-Beatles tells us that Google is entering into a $350,000 joint open source technology venture with both Oregon State and Portland State Universities. From the article: "With the grant, the universities will collaborate to encourage open source software and hardware development, develop academic curricula and provide computing infrastructure to open source projects worldwide. The universities will also help provide a bridge between Oregon's universities and Oregon's growing open technology industry." Google also has their version of the announcement on blogspot.

189 comments

  1. Google in State Universities? by pen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't it policy to keep religion out of state schools? ;-)

    1. Re:Google in State Universities? by jzeejunk · · Score: 3, Funny

      only if it isn't designed intelligently ;)

      --
      sarchasm
    2. Re:Google in State Universities? by CDPatten · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      lol, well they let Linux in...

      anyways I think the policy is just no christian religion in state schools.

    3. Re:Google in State Universities? by nmb3000 · · Score: 1

      Isn't it policy to keep religion out of state schools? ;-)

      Perhaps, but it's also policy for Slashdot to have at least 80 Google stories each week. Just trying to fulfill their quota, you understand.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    4. Re:Google in State Universities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > anyways I think the policy is just no christian religion in state schools.

      like any other religion would be brought into school...

    5. Re:Google in State Universities? by Agarax · · Score: 1

      Blessed be that the Disciples of the Penguin God are permitted to spread the word of Tux among the unbelievers and followers of Mammon!

      --
      Remember folks, slashdot doesn't have a -1 "disagree" moderation!
    6. Re:Google in State Universities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grandparent post was probably made by some Christian playing the persecution card again.

    7. Re:Google in State Universities? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No gaddarn palasy like dat d'ere in da good ol' U.S. of A. God bless ya.

      Damn glad I moved away from your .. well, entire continent, actually.

    8. Re:Google in State Universities? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Christians are always crying persecution, even when they're 90% of the population. They're always happy to push their morals on the rest of us, but as soon as someone objects, it's "we're being persecuted!!"

  2. I see why Google wants in by saskboy · · Score: 1

    "Analyst firm IDC estimates that the Linux® hardware and software markets will grow to $38 billion by 2008, with annual growth rates topping 25%."

    Google will need some of that $38 Billion goodness to keep its stock from stagnating.

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  3. A prediction by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can predict that the majority of posts will be that this is a good thing. However I can't help but think that if Microsoft worked with a state and university to encourage closed source software and hardware development, develop academic curricula and provide computing infrastructure to closed source projects worldwide that everyone would say how dare a company try to buy a university into spreading it's FUD.

    While it's a good thing that this university is helping to develop open source software, this sort of zealotry on slashdot makes it difficult to take any points it offers on closed or open source software. Open source zealots ultimately hurt open source software more then closed source software. So perhaps think about the points you make before you start preaching to the choir.

    1. Re:A prediction by Aadain2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must be new here

      Open Source = Good
      Closed Source = The Devil

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    2. Re:A prediction by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 5, Insightful
      However I can't help but think that if Microsoft worked with a state and university to encourage closed source software and hardware development, develop academic curricula and provide computing infrastructure to closed source projects worldwide that everyone would say how dare a company try to buy a university into spreading it's FUD.

      1. I don't see what Microsoft has to do with it. If Google were pushing closed source curricula on a university, I think the reaction would be negative.
      2. I don't see what Fear Uncertainty and Doubt anyone could be spreading by doing anything like this.
      3. How could a company pushing open source be looking to buy a university? The university can just go to another provider if they don't like Google's attitude -- that's why it's different with open source software. With closed source it would be a lock-in.
      4. Open source fits in more with academia. Mainly, academic/scientific discoveries are usually funded by the university and open to the world. The idea isn't to make profit (closed source), but to share information (open source).

      It's not as though open source = Good! closed source = Bad! all the time, it's just that in this situation, it seems clear open source is a better choice and doesn't apply to what you said.
    3. Re:A prediction by rumcho · · Score: 1

      I don't see anything wrong with zealotry, especially when it's for a good cause like open source software. Please bring a point and don't waste bytes. Roumen. P.S. BTW, your sig is stupid.

    4. Re:A prediction by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      I don't see anything wrong with zealotry, especially when it's for a good cause like open source software.

      Zealotry is an excess of zeal. Excess is bad. Even when it's for a "good cause."

      Zealotry denotes zeal in excess, referring to cases where activism and ambition in relation to an ideology have become excessive to the point of being harmful to others, oneself, and one's own cause. (zealotry - Wikipedia, emphasis mine)

    5. Re:A prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A key difference is that it's unlikely Microsoft would give a University that kind of money with no strings attached and say "do unspecified good things with it". I've never seen them do so. This is what Google did, and I think it's pretty amazing.

    6. Re:A prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      However I can't help but think that if Microsoft worked with a state and university to encourage closed source software and hardware development, develop academic curricula and provide computing infrastructure to closed source projects worldwide that everyone would say how dare a company try to buy a university into spreading it's FUD.

      -------

      Microsoft gives free version of Visual Studio .NET 2003, XP, 2k, Virtual Server, SQL, and a host of other programs for free to people who are in the engineering department of my school. The interesting thing is, even if you are in a completly unrelated curriculum (such as Electrical Engineering or Assembly Programming), you still get the whole lot of it for free.

      Draw whatever conclusions you like, I for one feel good about owning a valid Microsoft CD key for the first time since I played Zork. Then again, I liked Crystal Pepsi and the band Styx, so YMMV.

    7. Re:A prediction by sivadnitsuj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I almost never post comments here (and thus will probably never be seen), but I had to say something..

      While I might agree with some of the philosophical ideologies common on slashdot, I do get tired of the seeming group think sometimes.

      regardless, your comment seems ill thought out..

      If Microsoft contributed money, time, resources and influence to promote closed source software through American Universities, all it would add up to is a sponsored marketing effort, no different than coca-cola or pepsi sponsoring a high school to get their vending machines exclusively represented on campus.

      Google dumping money into open source projects (while it obviously provides them with some good PR) directly benefits everyone. *Everyone*.. or at least, everyone that's not supported by closed-source companies.

      cheers..

    8. Re:A prediction by ZombieRoboNinja · · Score: 1

      So your saying that people LIKE it when someone promotes their own agenda, and DISLIKE it when someone promotes an agenda diametrically opposed to their own? Scandalous!

    9. Re:A prediction by rif42 · · Score: 1

      Google news... Google news... Google news nuisance...

      I look forward to the day that Slashdot admins sell their Google stocks so there can come other news stories than these Google stock price nursings.

    10. Re:A prediction by killjoe · · Score: 1

      I would also like to point out that all people who use open source are zealots and should be labled as zealots at every opportunity. Nobody who works for microsoft is a zealot though. Even if they throw chairs around and curse. People who shill for MS also are not zealots along with people MS pays to astro turf for them. They are not zealots either.

      The only people who are zealots are people who speak about open source.

      "However I can't help but think that if Microsoft worked with a state and university to encourage closed source software and hardware development, develop academic curricula and provide computing infrastructure to closed source projects worldwide that everyone would say how dare a company try to buy a university into spreading it's FUD."

      DO you know what this is? Because closed source is bad open source is good. If MS paid money to encourage open source curriculums and software develepment we would all cheer (after we got done ice skating in hell of course).

      Face it MS would never do anything that would benefit open source. They would make sure everything that came out would be their property or only work in windows or some other silly and stupid thing. That's the way they are, they can't and won't change.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    11. Re:A prediction by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I would also like to point out that all people who use open source are zealots

      Not true. Despite what you see on slashdot, there are people out there that use open source because it gets the job done best (or they wouldn't use it).

      Because closed source is bad open source is good.

      That is zealotry.

    12. Re:A prediction by killjoe · · Score: 1

      You know if you believed that open source was the devil and closed source was good you could hang out at gotdotnet. It's a big internet, there is room for everybody. At least here they don't delete your posts.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    13. Re:A prediction by LionKimbro · · Score: 2, Insightful


      ROCK ON, PORTLAND!

      Face it: We're fighting a battle, and we see signs of winning! What's not to be excited about?

      Don't be shocked that we're happy and cheering! :) This isn't the place people go to for well reasoned arguments. They exist; They're just not here. This is where we cheer, talk, and give off-the-cuff strategy, ideas, encouragement.

      I don't know of any good effort that succeeds without room for clapping & celebration over small victories.

    14. Re:A prediction by zojakownith · · Score: 0

      refer to sig. (well, the 2nd line.)

      --
      I have bad karma....

      Open source is heavenly, Microsoft is the devil, SCO is going to hell

    15. Re:A prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Domo, domo, domo arigato, Mr. Roboto!

    16. Re:A prediction by tutori · · Score: 1

      But then again, they may simply be giving it away as a business strategy. They gave away Ms-DOS free as well. Students using your software -> students familiar with your software -> graduates with jobs who want to use your software...

    17. Re:A prediction by Azi+Dahaka · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Easy +5 insightful/interesting: In any thread regarding an open source-supportive company or FOSS project being praised, all you need to do is post a comment, "If Microsoft were to do this it would be decried!"

      These should be -1 Off Topic. These comments have nothing to do with the story and are misleading anyway. Most stories posted about Microsoft are about their latest shenanigans, so obviously most posts are critical of them. The few times Microsoft have been victimized by patents or done something positive a good portion of posts are supportive of Microsoft.

      Instead it's free karma for saying nothing of worth.

    18. Re:A prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drinks at Pala tonight! Who's in? I'll be there at 9PM.

    19. Re:A prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Microsoft (and Gates) have given billions to charity and put computers in thousands of schools.

      Google temporarily placed a hurricane donation link on their website.

      I'll let you draw your own conclusions.

    20. Re:A prediction by slvi · · Score: 1

      But isn't that already happening? Isn't closed source developement funded by companies the norm?

    21. Re:A prediction by size1one · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "The university can just go to another provider if they don't like Google's attitude -- that's why it's different with open source software. With closed source it would be a lock-in."

      In fact thats just what Oregon State University did when googles prices were too high. They replaced thier Google box with Nutch Search Engine and saved around $100,000 a year. Fortunatly Google apparently does not have any (or enough) bad blood about this to prevent them from taking the initiative to promote open source.

    22. Re:A prediction by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Academia is by its very nature open source. Try publishing a closed source paper :P

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
    23. Re:A prediction by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "That is zealotry."

      No that's just a belief. I believe in democracy too does that make me a zealot? I belive that sharing is good does that make me a zealot.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    24. Re:A prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you 100%. Anyway who are those ret...rds to assign scores?

    25. Re:A prediction by fiziksphreak · · Score: 1

      I previously went to a college that had an agreement with Microsoft that gave all of the computer science students free copies of Windows, Visual studio and a bunch of other software. The catch was of course that they had to use Microsoft software in the class room. I think "YOU" should think before you start preaching to the choir.

    26. Re:A prediction by nacturation · · Score: 1

      I belive that sharing is good does that make me a zealot.

      No, that makes you a communist. Thanks for playing. ;)

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    27. Re:A prediction by Taladar · · Score: 1

      And since all Americans were brainwashed somewhere around the 1980s to believe everything communist (not just the political system labeled communism in Russia) is bad that automatically makes you bad too.

    28. Re:A prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The University of Waterloo, Canada, is a very famous university recruitment center for, you guessed it, M$. M$ has donated millions to the university to ensure that their graduates are certifiable Micro$erfs. And M$ is attempting to brainwash the next generation with software and curriculum in high schools, etc. The Univ. of Waterloo campus is littered with bluescreen M$ junk. So, choose your poison. I am immediately going to investigate applying for the open source programs, and universities offering such courses have just jumped to the top of my list.

    29. Re:A prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most open source doesn't benefit Everyone (that's everyone with a capital e.) It benefits computer nerds. The vast majority of open source isn't productized and isn't usable by the people who make up everyone. Sure, theoretically my grandmother could go out and build a MythTV box, but in reality that's not going to happen. Code produced on the tax payer's dime should be public domain, not open source. Even with Google throwing a bucket of money at UoO, the tax payers are still supporting the production of whatever activities are going on here.

      The question people should be asking should be: What does Oregan have that Google wants?

    30. Re:A prediction by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I can't help but think that if Microsoft worked with a state and university to encourage closed source software and hardware development, develop academic curricula and provide computing infrastructure to closed source projects worldwide that everyone would say how dare a company try to buy a university into spreading it's FUD.

      Open source is a feature of software that benefits some users and purchasers of software. Closed source is the lack of that feature. With that in mind, I think I would object to any company partnering with a University to specifically create software without a given, beneficial feature. For instance, I would applaud "Google partners with universities to create more worm resistant software." I would be less thrilled about, "Google partners with local universities to create software that is not any more resistant to worms." Thus Google investing and helping to create software with a given feature is something most people find to be a good thing, but Google or anyone else partnering to create software specifically without a given feature, because it is good for their business model, well that is not something most of us would appreciate.

    31. Re:A prediction by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      Encourage closed source software at universities. Er whats the point, heres the software, use it, you can't see whats in it because it is closed source and proprietary (if you try you might get sued, DMCA), trade secrets you know.

      Excuse me but how would the microsofties make any money if they gave away all the software to universities with unlimited licences for the students (their work gets graded and passed around and openly reviewed), after all the is the inherent specific difference between Windows and Linux.

      Microsoft is free to particpate in open source just like anyone else, they largely choose not to and make efforts to prevent other people from doing so because of their inherent ignorance and greed. You don't get taught to write closed source software (what could you possibly learn the source is closed), you only get taught to pay for and use closed source software (and after you finish school, throw it in the bin and pay for the full proprietary version, no educational versions for you, you commie, zealot cancer upon microsoft profits).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  4. Me want info! by mister_llah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like a new and improved Sourceforge... interesting.

    I'd like to know what would qualify you to computing resources...

    I'd also like to know if this is intended as philantropy or investment...

    --
    MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
    http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  5. Why was Oregon U Chosen? by *+*+Beatles-Beatles · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did Oregon they feel invisibly sandwiched between Washington and Silicon Valley North California - as not also being on the forefront of the non stop tech - revolutions coming from the northwest USA?

    --
    http://george-harrison.info/
    1. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by genericacct · · Score: 5, Interesting
      For one thing, we are home to the OSDL and Linus Torvalds. PSU and OSU have pretty good Computer Science programs. Intel and Tektronix have huge campuses here. There's no shortage of computing professionals in Oregon.

      I'm just surprised Portland State and Oregon State don't have anything about it on their front pages.

    2. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by Sabaki · · Score: 1

      Not so invisibly.

      On the other hand, we've got Intel. And Linus. There's actually lots of tech here, it's just cheaper to live.

    3. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, just adding to the list

    4. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by Stupendoussteve · · Score: 0

      Well, Oregon State is home to the OSUOSL.... it's used by everyone from Gentoo to Mozilla, suse and freenode... No idea why PSU was involved...

    5. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by Professional+Slacker · · Score: 1

      And don't forget about OSL, they haven't been slashdotted recently.

      --
      A Free Market requires informed intelligent consumers, such people are rare, we're in trouble.
    6. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Portland state didnt have anything on their front page about it because the IT group there is a bunch of luddites.

    7. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      Wow, yeah.

      The Silicon Forest of Portland, Oregon is going strong.

      Nike, Adidas, Columbia Sportswear, Freightliner, and a few other companies call the Portland area home, as well as others mentioned.

      I've never had too much issue finding work when I needed it in Portland either.

      Portland is a great home for a geek.

    8. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by tji · · Score: 1

      Silicon Valley is ridiculously expensive..

      Commercial real estate is not too bad here, with over-capacity after the internet bubble burst. But, it's not exactly cheap compared to the rest of the country.

      Housing prices are insane (2 bedroom condo for $500K, small houses for $1M).

      Salaries are higher than other areas (though, not high enough to pay for housing).

      Silicon Valley is the land of the high roller startup, getting 10s of millions from VC firms. Obviously, this is not the standard operating procedure for open source projects.

      Oregon is in fairly close proximity to Silicon Valley and Seattle, but has lower costs associated with it.

      Okay, so where are the Oregon jobs listed? I would gladly get the hell out of Silicon Valley and move to Portland where I can buy a house.

    9. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by Cannedbread · · Score: 0

      maybe its just cause i live here, but about once a week i notice an article on slashdot reminding me of why portland/oregon is so wonderful. Anyone else notice that?

    10. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by Josh+Triplett · · Score: 1
      Okay, so where are the Oregon jobs listed? I would gladly get the hell out of Silicon Valley and move to Portland where I can buy a house.


      A few I know of are Jobdango and Oregon Live's jobs page. The former is likely more useful than the latter.

      You might also try just finding out which companies are in the Oregon area and looking at their jobs pages to see if they have jobs in the area.

      Some of the notable large employers in Oregon include Google, Intel, IBM, and HP. There are also a huge number of smaller companies in Oregon if you prefer that type of environment.
    11. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by Nailer · · Score: 1

      Did Oregon they feel invisibly sandwiched between Washington and Silicon Valley North California - as not also being on the forefront of the non stop tech - revolutions coming from the northwest USA?

      Yeah, I bet they totally feel that way. The poor Oregonians have to spend all day looking at cute semi-naked gothic girls, listening to indie pop music, and buying Diesel Sweeties T shirts. I'm sure they really miss your non-stop tech revolution.

      * I haven't actually been to the US. But when I will, Portland Oregon will be the first place I want to visit.

    12. Re:Why was Oregon U Chosen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: Why PSU?
      A: Keith Packard, principal X developer

      http://groups.osdl.org/forums/higher_ed_projects/

  6. They're doing too much stuff by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 3, Funny

    in the last 6 articles today, every other article is about google. Google is doing too much stuff, they need to spread their projects around a bit so I could get news about others companies and technological innovations as well.

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
    1. Re:They're doing too much stuff by jshaped · · Score: 1

      you're not the only person to notice that.
      and that brings up a good question...
      do we still like google?
      or are they starting to resemble a large, unstoppable giant?
      also, slashdot should create a google section to organize all google stories

    2. Re:They're doing too much stuff by Omnieiunium · · Score: 1

      It's not like Slashdot is owned by Google... wait a second..

    3. Re:They're doing too much stuff by Dmac1985 · · Score: 1

      http://www.google.com/corporate/tenthings.html> This is Google's "Ten Things" Philosophy. Number 2 on Google's "Ten Things" is "It's best to do one thing really, really well". I'm not saying they don't do search ridiculously well, but the idea that they may have too many things going on at once is not unwarranted.

    4. Re:They're doing too much stuff by CagedBear · · Score: 1

      I had this conversation with someone in my office recently. He likened Google's approach to "throwing a pot of wet noodles at the wall to see which ones stick". I think they have a percentage of their cash set aside for bottom-up creative thinking and R&D. They'll decide later which areas to focus on and which ones to let die out.

    5. Re:They're doing too much stuff by BarryNorton · · Score: 1
      do we still like google?
      Yes, what is the appropriate Slashbot response?... Quickly, I'm thinking for myself here!
    6. Re:They're doing too much stuff by CyricZ · · Score: 1

      Well, your answer could potentially be Yes, No, Perhaps, Maybe, Only on Tuesdays, Sure, Yup, Nope, I don't know, or any number of other replies to such a question.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
  7. OSH? by werewolf1031 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...to encourage open source software and hardware development...

    Ok, I can see open source software development being done at minimal cost, but hardware? Not trolling here, I'm genuinely curious, can someone explain to me how open source hardware development can be economical? I mean let's face a little reality here, if someone is going to undertake the (rather expensive) industrial task of hardware development, at the very least the need to recoup their investment, and ideally they'll make a profit -- at least that's the goal, or else they wouldn't bother in the first place.

    Sooo... Anyone care to chime in here and explain this to me? Thanks in advance.

    1. Re:OSH? by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Open Source Hardware

      Seems they share schematics for the design. I'd imagine you could sell the hardware for profit (binaries) so long as you made the schematics (source code) available to those who bought it. Seems like a reasonable idea.

    2. Re:OSH? by ankarbass · · Score: 1
      --
      Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    3. Re:OSH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's plenty of open source hardware, the *design* is open source, you obviously pay for the hardware itself. Think books with no copyright (shakespeare, for example). Since they don't have to recoup the R&D (or author rights) they cost a LOT less, potentially.

    4. Re:OSH? by po8 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Open hardware is like open source; it's about designs, schematics, PCB layouts, FPGA codes, etc. There are several existing open hardware projects at Portland State, notably Portland State Aerospace Society's rockets and a Software-Defined Radio project built on the open-hardware Universal Software Radio Peripheral. More are expected.

    5. Re:OSH? by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      There is a large market for using embedded and custom hardware running a non-proprietary control program (like linux). There are a ton of embedded projects that use proprietary technology and put an Open OS on it. Think Linux running on motorola based embedded microcontrollers, or Intel or AMD microcontrollers..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    6. Re:OSH? by werewolf1031 · · Score: 1

      First off, thanks to everyone who helped answer my question.

      Second, it seems to me that this open hardware concept could be not only hugely profitable to all involved, but could potentially be like dropping a lit match into a keg of gunpowder in terms of the shear rate of technological advancement for any respective hardware field. Being a gamer myself, I'm immediately thinking of video cards (among other gaming hardware). And then I think, imagine the explosion in graphical power for PCs if, for ex., both nVidia and ATI would open-source their hardware specs, both making advances on each others' research cooperatively? (Yes, modern 3D hardware is rapidly approaching "total realism" in terms of graphical capability, but it's the 1st thing that came to mind.)

      Ah, but there's the snag. Both of those corporations are in it for profit, first and foremost, and any advantage they can keep over the other is one that they'll fight tooth and nail to hang on to.

      I suppose eventually it comes down to two or more entities mutually choosing to cooperate and share the fruits of their labor (ie. hardware specs, performance advances, etc.) for this to really take off. As po8 pointed out, there are already open-hardware projects underway in the rocketry and radio fields. My question, as a gaming-oriented consumer, is: Does anyone know of any more "mainstream" open-hardware projects currently in progress? I'd love to hear about 'em.

    7. Re:OSH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever hear of a company called RedHat, as an example? I would suggest that open hardware could also be very appealing and profitable, especially to companies that are already using linux, etc., so that they could just buy off the shelf...:-)

  8. Core curriculum by kevin_conaway · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As long as they don't forget core CS curriculum like data structures, algorithms and operating systems, I see this as a good thing. Also note that this should be part of a well-rounded education.

    Learning ONLY about OSS software is just as bad as learning ONLY about proprietary and/or closed source software. Students need to be educated in all aspects of the field so that they can make good decisions when the time comes and not try to apply one solution to every problem.

    1. Re:Core curriculum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost as bad as ATM machines?

    2. Re:Core curriculum by size1one · · Score: 1

      No CS curriculum should focus on any software whether it is closed or open sourced. The core is the same for both. The things that need to be taught about OSS software development are general things like licensing, building and sending patches, how to evaluate software. In short, students need to learn how to use and be involved with Open Source and what it is all about: Community.

    3. Re:Core curriculum by Eivind · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Bull.

      CS-students learn about computer-science primarily, and only a distant second about licensing. In-depth studies over licensing is law, not CS. Sure, CS students should know the very basics, enough to avoid breaking the law themselves, or atleast enough to know when to consult a lawyer, but licenses are not central to a CS-curriculum.

      You can only usefully learn from a program you can study. You can only reasonably study a program where you are allowed picking the program apart and look at the innards. That is a lot more practical for programs that come with source-code.

      It's easy to pick say Linux apart and find examples where the kernel use semaphores, spinlocks, linked-lists, heaps, priority-queues, binary trees and a lot of other concepts a CS-student should know about.

      It's an exersize in frustration to try the same with say Windows, unless you've got the sourcecode. Actually, doing so with a closed program would teach you more about decompilers etc than it would about the basic algorithms and datastructures. (this migth be a worthwhile thing to learn btw, but it's still something different)

      Proprietary linked lists aren't conceptually different to OS linked lists. 99% of the stuff you learn in CS should be totally independent of the license the finished work will be published under.

    4. Re:Core curriculum by slapout · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I could see the Freshman starting with learning the data structures, etc. Then having the Seniors work on OSS for their work as opposed to a project that the prof makes up.

      --
      Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad
    5. Re:Core curriculum by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      "Learning ONLY about OSS software is just as bad as learning ONLY about proprietary and/or closed source software."

      Where do you get that idea that they are going to learn "ONLY about OSS software"?

      Also, a piece of code is a piece of code no matter what license you slap to it. I doubt there's such thing as OSS skill set and closed source software skill set. Of course there's different experience depending on the environment you work in, but I doubt they can teach that in school anyway.

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
  9. An attack on Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anykind of investment in open source is an implicit attack against Microsoft. Google knows this, and they know that with little money, they can create lots of open source software as demostrated by the Google Summer of Code program.

    Now I ask you this, creatively think of ways of what Microsoft can do with little investment that can be interpreted as an attack on Google.

    1. Re:An attack on Microsoft by kernel_dan · · Score: 1

      I really don't see it like that. Google is really just trying to build a positive reputation (which they seem to excel at with the Slashdot crowd) and get improve upon open source code so that they (Google) and their users can have good software. If supporting open source development were expensive, then you can bet that Google would not be embracing it to the level it does.

      There's no reason to say that this is a shot across the bow of Microsoft. Google is just encouraging an ideal of openess that happens to benefit them for a multitude of reasons.

      --

      Illegal? Samir, This is America.
  10. Oregon Trail? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I hope google doesn't get dysentery

    1. Re:Oregon Trail? by discogravy · · Score: 1

      don't worry, they have lots of oxen. I'd be interested in seeing a google-simple UI to OSU's "maintain" DNS and DHCP program (although maintain is already a simplification of isc's dhcp and djbdns, something like that would be a real boon to admins who don't want to deal with dhcp and dns via CLI all the time).

  11. Welcome by The-Perl-CD-Bookshel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Welcome to the new Googledot. Enjoy your stay!

    --
    I don't keep a lid on my coffee so when I walk around I look busy -me
  12. not sure... by CDPatten · · Score: 3, Insightful

    how this helps Google's investors. They won't own the rights to the software, or anything created with these schools.

    While I think its a "cool" "fun" "nice" thing Google is doing, it isn't creating revenue or raising the bottom line (other then the media having pre-mature orgasms over it).

    Google is turning into an amazing manipulator of the media, but they still don't have any tangible revenue streams other then their click ads revenue. They are following the path of all the dot bombs to date.

    Even look at GMail, wich many of us love, it has a puny share of the email market (hotmail and yahoo), and creates no real revenue.

    I hate to say it, but Bill Gates is right. Google is just in a long honey moon phase prolonged by being a media darling. They are just throwing money around like there is no tomorrow.

    It concerns me as an investor. PayPal/eBay won't go down without a huge fight. Google's attempt to cut into Amazon's market with Froogle flopped, and quite frankly, I don't see them unseating eBay anytime soon.

    I say give them two more years and their stock will be below yahoo and dropping fast.

    1. Re:not sure... by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 1

      It concerns me as an investor. PayPal/eBay won't go down without a huge fight. Google's attempt to cut into Amazon's market with Froogle flopped, and quite frankly, I don't see them unseating eBay anytime soon.

      Google's attempt to what? Does Amazon have search engine that finds the lowest prices? Google isn't actually selling anything with Froogle. They seem like completely different services to me.

    2. Re:not sure... by CDPatten · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Slow down cowboy, you have responded allot of posts on this topic and your responses are these have baked few liners. You racing somebody to see who has the most posts?

      Froogle is designed to take traffic from amazon's space. The idea is "Go to Froogle to buy something vs going to Amazon".

      Stop being such a no it all. Maybe if you slowed down a bit and stopped posting every ten seconds you would get a few more things right.

    3. Re:not sure... by LLuthor · · Score: 1

      Froogle lists amazon - therefore is not in competition with it.

      --
      LL
    4. Re:not sure... by Mr.123 · · Score: 1

      It builds goodwill. And goodwill shows up on balance sheets with an estimated value.

    5. Re:not sure... by darkmeridian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think we ain't seen nothing yet from Google. The projects are synergistic. Once it all comes together, then watch out.

      Froogle wasn't meant to compete with Amazon because Google never stocked products. But pretend Google gets a good micropayment system going. GMoney lets you buy from vendors that show up on Froogle. Or GMail/GTalk gives you an ad from a GMoney accepting vendor. So Google makes money from the ads and from the GMoney transaction fees.

      GVideo? Yep. Micropayments.

      GData? Don't use Microsoft. Just use our webbrower based system.

      You sell your Google stock. I think Google will do just fine.

      --
      A NYC lawyer blogs. http://www.chuangblog.com/
    6. Re:not sure... by CDPatten · · Score: 1

      Following your logic; until very recently MS used yahoo for all their click ads, yahoo ads on MSN? Oh my... "therefore is not in competition with it."

      great logic.

    7. Re:not sure... by Aadain2001 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Supporting Open Source is not throwing away your money or doing something purely for philosophical reasons. Look at it this way: Google uses Linux/OSS heavily, so promoting future developers to improve current OSS projects and create new ones could potentially lead to yet more OSS that Google can use in their business. Google is probably banking on the idea that this investment will be much lower than whatever future OSS that is developed from this program ends up saving.

      So you can support OSS with an eye on the bottome line. Maybe not the bottom line this quarter or next quarter, but sometime in the future. Look at IBM. They won't make a dime directly off of Linux, but they can use Linux to help them sell their servers. So it is in their interest to keep Linux improving and moving forward in performance. With IBM it's easy to see why they would want to support Linux. With Google it's a bit harder because they benifit from Linux in their daily operations of their company and services, which isn't directly seen by regular users.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    8. Re:not sure... by wickedhobo · · Score: 1

      I must say, I'm amazed at the overwhelming shortsightedness of this comment. Or maybe it's typical some people not to understand that not every return is immediate. So....

      1) Google employees loads of systems and software engineers. Giving money to a university based center like OSU, PSU, and the Open Source Lab seems pretty smart. Does it generate an immediate ROA? no...But lot's of companies looking to get into Open Source are complaining about access to talent. Contributing to cirriculum and research seems like a good non-direct return.

      2) Google uses loads of Open Source to help directly nail their margins. Having a healthy Open Source community helps that.

      --

      --Stupidity is Self Curing!
    9. Re:not sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is turning into an amazing manipulator of the media, but they still don't have any tangible revenue streams other then their click ads revenue.

      So what you are saying is: "They don't have any way of making money (if you don't count the ways they are making money)."?

      Even look at GMail, wich many of us love, it has a puny share of the email market (hotmail and yahoo), and creates no real revenue.

      GMail isn't a mature service yet. The "beta" label is a bit of a giveaway. It's also not been around anywhere near as long, so it hasn't had a chance to accumulate all the dead accounts that the others have. On what basis do you claim that it creates no "real" revenue (what other kind of revenue is there anyway, fictional revenue?), seeing as it's serving ads and Google are successfully charging money for that?

      They are just throwing money around like there is no tomorrow.

      What, exactly, do you think money is for, if not to spend? They've raised a hell of a lot of money, and now it's time to invest it. They are investing it in services (e.g. Gmail) and in mindshare/PR, which you have pointed out yourself.

      PayPal/eBay won't go down without a huge fight.

      What makes you think that Google are depending on them "going down"? Two companies can coexist in a market, with each one of them making a profit.

      Google's attempt to cut into Amazon's market with Froogle flopped

      I don't see the slightest connection between the two, beyond "people sell stuff over the Internet sometimes".

      and quite frankly, I don't see them unseating eBay anytime soon.

      Yeah, well I don't see NASA unseating Diet Coke any time soon. What's that? The two organisations offer radically different services? No shit. Since when does Google's profits depend on their nonexistent auction service?

    10. Re:not sure... by CDPatten · · Score: 1

      "Yeah, well I don't see NASA unseating Diet Coke any time soon. What's that? The two organisations offer radically different services? No shit. Since when does Google's profits depend on their nonexistent auction service?"

      Seriously. Did you even read the article that started this post? I'd go tit for tat with you now, but my wife is nagging me to get off the computer, so i guess you'll have to wait until morning.

    11. Re:not sure... by Bemmu · · Score: 1

      Contacts are everything. By helping universities, Google might get new brains to join their borg cube later on.

    12. Re:not sure... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      If Google gets students hooked on open source they deny talent to MS. MS has publicly stated that they intend to kill google (and the CEO of google was named explicitly). I think this makes perfect long term sense for shareholders. MS is going to Kill google unless google does something to stop them.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    13. Re:not sure... by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Relax. It's only Slashdot.

    14. Re:not sure... by CDPatten · · Score: 1

      where did they say it publically? I've read the an ex-employee who just quite said that Balmer said it to him privately in his office before throwing a chair. Did they say it somewhere else?

    15. Re:not sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the article that started this post?

      Of course I read it. It doesn't support your fantasy world one bit. You are talking bollocks.

      I'd go tit for tat with you now, but my wife is nagging me to get off the computer

      Don't you mean "mom and dad took away my Internet access for annoying grown-ups with my inane blather"?

    16. Re:not sure... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      That was sworn testimony in court.

      Why do you ask anyway? Does it need to be said someplace else? Is it a shocking thing to imagine that Ballmer wants to kill google or any other company on the planet?

      --
      evil is as evil does
    17. Re:not sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Froogle is designed to take traffic from amazon's space. The idea is "Go to Froogle to buy something vs going to Amazon".

      ...

      Following your logic; until very recently MS used yahoo for all their click ads, yahoo ads on MSN? Oh my... "therefore is not in competition with it."

      Following your logic, Slashdot is designed to take traffic from Amazon's space. The idea is "go to Slashdot to read instead of buying a book at Amazon."

      Froogle is completely different than Amazon. Froogle is for people who want to find the lowest price available and don't mind taking the time to do it. Amazon is for people who want to go to the same store that they know and don't mind paying a couple extra bucks for the convenience. Sure they are both "shopping sites" in a broad sense, but they are designed for completely different purposes.

      I think it's more likely Froogle is designed to take traffic away from Yahoo, MSN Search, etc. Google is branching it's searches now: shopping, local, blogs, books, and standard web, thus making it a more efficient search engine.

    18. Re:not sure... by CDPatten · · Score: 1

      Well, to be fair you were wrong; "MS has publicly stated that they intend to kill google (and the CEO of google was named explicitly)". MS has NOT said that publicly. In fact Ballmer has denied publicly in an interview that he threw the chair, and I'd imagine if asked he would deny the statement as well. You could say he is lying, but there were only two people in the room, neither of them were us, which means it's a 50-50.

      That said; let's pretend he did say it. I think anyone who is intellectually honest would say that it is not unreasonable for someone who just lost a prized employee to act out in frustration and say "I'm going to kill them", not literally KILL people, but more of a figurative, beat them in the business world. Kinda like "Fine take him, we don't need him, we are still going to win!" Athletes say they are going to kill the other team all the time, but that doesn't mean they walk on the field with a gun, it means that they think they are going to WIN.

      As far as surprising that corporations in the same market place want to kill/beat each other, no I don't find that surprising. I also don't mind it. That mentality comes from competition and from a company's desire to grow and do well. Google wants to kill/beat Yahoo, just like they killed AltaVista or Lycos forcing them into submission and then to be sold off as scrap. It's called the free market, capitalism, the real world. As long as no laws are broken, I think its great.

      If Ballmer didn't want to be the best and beat Google in the search market then MS should be looking for a new CEO. Just like if Eric Schmidt didn't want to beat MSN and Yahoo in search then Google should be looking for a new CEO.

      Stop trying to make up ammo against MS by holding them to standards you wouldn't hold another company to. It just makes you side look petty and quite frankly its just stupid.

    19. Re:not sure... by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "ou could say he is lying, but there were only two people in the room, neither of them were us, which means it's a 50-50."

      It was a sworn testimony in a court of law. The chances of it being true are way more then 50/50 because the person saying it is risking perjury. Also the statement is in keeping with Ballmers personality. This is not the first time somebody has reported profanity laden tirades from the MS executive boardrooms.

      "Stop trying to make up ammo against MS by holding them to standards you wouldn't hold another company to."

      Not all companies are unethical and sleazy as MS. There are good corporations on this planet as well as tens of thousands of companies run by good honest people who do good honest work. You demean those people when you compare them to MS and suggest that every single one of them is as evil and corrupt as Microsoft is. It's not fair to them.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  13. Google must be pretty forgiving... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    After the big middle finger they got from the OSU Open Source Lab last year: http://osuosl.org/news_folder/nutch Of course, in their defense, all the hard work their sub-department put into the conversion saved the university over $100,000 a year. Good work, guys!

  14. As a Portland State CS Student by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a Portland State CS Student I applaud this move, OSS groups are thriving in Oregon mostly do to a group of large tech industry players and a grassroots movement. I see a large amount of influence comming out of Oregon for OSS, (OSDL, OSU Opensource labs, OSCON, bla bla bla). I can say at Portland State that its the largest college in Oregon but a urban college. Their CS is mostly all Solaris Unix Stuff, but most of the CS majors are OSS freaks and Linux geeks.

  15. WOW. by Xx+Shinwa+xX · · Score: 1

    When I opened up Slashdot today, I saw a googol - 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999997 articles today. That's a lot of news items about Google.

    1. Re:WOW. by WNivek · · Score: 1

      correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't a googol == 10^100? I think you're about three short.

  16. Software freedom should be valued for itself. by jbn-o · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You completely ignore the ethical ramifications of non-free software, and you don't seem to have any criticism of corporate welfare either. It's also telling that pursuing free software gets called "zealotry" while a proprietor pursuing its ends gets no such namecalling.

    1. Re:Software freedom should be valued for itself. by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      "You completely ignore the ethical ramifications of non-free software"

      Not to mention the practical ramifications. Non-free software brings lock-in and lack of flexibility, it's even against free market principles most of the times by helping monopolies and hurting free enterprise (especially small companies).

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    2. Re:Software freedom should be valued for itself. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You completely ignore the ethical ramifications of non-free software

      The ethical ramifications of non-free software are on a par with the ethical ramifications of choosing what to have for lunch.

      The only people who make it seem like a big issue are those whose lives are completely devoid of meaning otherwise.

  17. Crossection of Portland culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Latte Town" was coined a few years back and is the most appropriate term for the City of Portland that I have ever heard. A Latte town consists of mostly white, educated baby boomers and young single people. The inhabitants of the town are usually newcomers who have priced out all the original inhabitants. These towns are usually expensive, pretentious, abound in natural fibers and are laid back on the surface. Latte towns like Portland pride themselves on their most cherished concepts of diversity and inclusiveness. Most Portlanders accept this myth as Gospel but upon close examination Portland's dirty little secret is revealed. Portland is an overwhelmingly white, non-ethnic city. It is as vanilla as it gets so it makes one wonder what all the celebrating of diversity is all about. Drive through any neighborhood surrounding the downtown area and the impression that you get is that Portland is nothing more than a series of elitist ghettos compromised of rich white homosexuals, rich white yuppies, rich white hippies, rich white trust funders, and rich white kids from the suburbs pretending to be street people. Where's the diversity? Well it doesn't exist but the average Portlander likes the concept and in their eyes the different shades of rich whites all constituent diversity. In a series of articles I will attempt to breakdown and explain these subtle distinctions between the various factions of lily white, latte people that make Portland what it is.

    The Artist-Intellectual
    The visitor or newcomer to Portland is bound to be struck by the sheer numbers that belong to this group. They seem to be everywhere and are in fact everywhere. They are the reason that all the coffee shops have tables and chairs. The artist-intellectual fancies himself as a poet, a I practice on my artist-intellectual room mate every nite. But we're artists, so it's not really gay.writer, a musician, a filmmaker, etc. You get the drift. They spend most of their days idling around the coffee establishments that one finds every 10 feet. They are usually equipped with a notebook that they use for their poems, journals or their artwork. No one ever gets to see the contents of these notebooks. More often than not they have a beaten and weathered paper back copy of some book authored by Kafka or William S. Boroughs. They love to discuss their favorite subject, themselves. Given the opportunity they will prattle on for hours about their poems, art work or the film they are making. You never get to actually see any of their work but you do get to hear about it. Their lives are like one never ending semester in grad school. Initially I believed these losers but then got to thinking. What would an aspiring actor, artist, musician, filmmaker being doing in Portland Oregon, a latte town? Why wouldn't they be in NYC or LA? Because they're phonies, that's why. Here's how it works with these clowns. They flunk out of college in New Jersey so their parents send them to Reed College in Portland in hopes that they will get their act together. They drop out of Reed but stay in Portland while still on Daddy's tab or some trust find. One Saturday Josh or Seth drifts down to one of the hundreds of hippie craft markets downtown. Some hippie is selling didgeridoos that he made I between bong reps. Josh buy one and takes it home where he proceeds to get baked after which he blows a few sour notes into the didgeridoo. The next day he's a musician. Not really but that's what he's telling everyone at the coffee house and pretending is good enough for a Portland artist-intellectual, in fact it's everything. In three months he will switch his designation from musician to filmmaker and then onto to something else 3 months later. As long as it sounds cool he will keep this charade up and no one in his circles will call him on it because they are doing the same thing.

    Sure, I leech off of daddy's trust fund. Yeah, he's a banker. But I am only using his money to right the wrongs of his generation. And to pay for my lift tickets, dude.The Activist
    This group is

  18. Other Google projects by zymano · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't also mind if Google invested in Optic Fiber projects to the home.

    I understand the 'broadband over powerlines' might get stalled because of protests by ham radio people.

    1. Re:Other Google projects by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even better yet, Google could invest in "free wifi in every city", so we can do away with our damnable cellular networks in favor of VOIP! Oh wait...

  19. How to kick M$ in the shin... by ztirffritz · · Score: 1

    Step 1: Donate a huge sum of money to the people most likely to undo the M$ monoply so that they can work on the biggest competitor making it better, faster, easier, CHEAPER, more secure...and in the process, swicth a whole campus (or two)over to Linux. Step 2: ummm Step 3: Profit

    --
    Why doesn't anything interesting happen when I have mod points?
    1. Re:How to kick M$ in the shin... by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      />Sounds like t3h underpants gnomes :-D

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
  20. Google mentioned more than Yahoo or Linux in Oct by elfguygmail.com · · Score: 3, Informative

    Interestingly, Slashdot had a Google story 22 times since Oct 1. Yahoo had 3 times and Linux 21 times.

  21. Really Committed to Open Source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I look forward to perusing all googles search engine source code.

    Or do they only want other peole to make their source code open?

    If they were really committed they would practice what they preach.

    1. Re:Really Committed to Open Source? by PrvtBurrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is exactly correct, and suggests at a flaw in the GPL. Web service companies can edit GPL'd code all they want and they do not have to redistribute those changes. This clearly favors web service models over traditional ones.

      --
      Laboratree - Scientific collaboration based on OpenSocial.
  22. Makes me wonder.. by FunWithKnives · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why there are no Linux (or BSD, etc) versions of the majority of Google's software? Kind of unusual, eh?

    --
    "We may face a scorched and lifeless earth, but they're accountable to their shareholders first."
    1. Re:Makes me wonder.. by coolGuyZak · · Score: 1
      Well, look at it this way:

      Why should Google release software for an OSS platform when that platform will do it cheaper, easier, and "better" than the code they produce? Think about this: If they stay true to implementing and releasing standards-compliant products, then OSS can provide reference designs. Many of their services already work well with OSS projects already.

      • Gtalk-GAIM/Kopete (with sound support coming for several projects once they release the codec info).
      • GMail (works completely in FireFox, with an HTML-standard version for other browsers.)
      • Google desktop search (Open source products are replicating this in ways that are more applicable to their platform. See Tenor in KDE & the Gnome equivalent... forget its name)
      • The google search bar (Konq, Mozilla both support it by default).
      • The google search site ().
      Now, It would be hot to see a Linux version of Google Earth, and a konq-friendly version of maps. Hopefully they're on the way.
  23. Seems logical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems pretty obvious ti me that open source software helps google and hurts companies like Microsoft. Why? I have often felt that open source, more exactly GPL-like, software helps web service companies, because they can use GPL software, but they don't have to redistribute their additions to the GPL'd code. Why? Because they don't redistribute their softare, they only provide an interface to use that software on their cpus. Personally, I think this is a flaw in the GPL in the new economy, it favors web service models over traditional models.

  24. I'm broke. by beefypirate · · Score: 1

    As long they're going crazy with spending money and funding new projects, they could always send me money. I don't do much but I am kinda hungry and could go for some food. Google Pizza Money (beta), anyone?

  25. Both by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    There is no difference in this case. The best thing that can happen for the tech world is decrease the dependancy on MS. Of course, I expect that chair companies all over the world will cry foul over that.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Both by mister_llah · · Score: 1

      Well, sure, dependency on MS decreasing may increase diversity... but if all the diversity is just in a single group (i.e. if Google is talent-farming, for instance) ... we might wind up with another monster in the place of the former one.

      I'm rather cynical about any matter involving any form of power... because I know how human beings are.

      But, hey, yeah, I agree... the interim period of competition will be very good at the very least :D

      --
      MoM++ - A Classic Expanded - [Master of Magic 1.5]
      http://mompp.sourceforge.net/
  26. A whole 350K by MushMouth · · Score: 1, Troll

    Mr Brin must have had his maid stop polishing the gold bidet for a week.

    1. Re:A whole 350K by kertong · · Score: 1

      Larry drives a toyota prius hybrid, and Sergey just gets around on skates and lives in a rented apartment in mountain view.

      Gold bidet? naah. Perhaps a garden hose and some duct tape...

    2. Re:A whole 350K by D3m3rz3l · · Score: 1

      Yeah. People at Google get paid a lot but dont drive nice cars to work. After all, you dont want to appear like you're upstaging the boss. Haha.

  27. Why only 4 Google stories today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Certainly there's room to promote Google even more...

  28. Is that even enough for the furniture? by tivoKlr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean, come on, what will 350k buy nowadays? Is that enough to equip a full sized office with aeron chairs and furniture? Will there be enough left to purchase hardware? I guess going Open Source will save the M$ tax, so that might cover some of the shortfall, but come on...

    --
    Ocean is land, covered with water.
    1. Re:Is that even enough for the furniture? by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that Universities take 50% off the top of all grants for "infrastructure" costs.

    2. Re:Is that even enough for the furniture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah lets bitch about having $350k being donated. The OSU Open Source Lab should obviously hand it back.

      Come on, it's a donation! Google doesn't have to donate anything. $350k can go along way.

    3. Re:Is that even enough for the furniture? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1
      Is that enough to equip a full sized office with aeron chairs and furniture?

      Come on, this is a Google project! Just give a small hint to Microsoft and that chair problem will solve itself. Just remember to be on guard and you'll be able to catch the thrown chairs without injuring yourself! =)

      But seriously, I think the folks who get the money will need to budget the thing wisely and won't blow it on furniture first, even when ergonomy is very important...

    4. Re:Is that even enough for the furniture? by ronanbear · · Score: 1

      350k is less than is spent funding some PhD projects. Graduates with experience of open source in general and Linux in particular will be useful for FOSS. Google get advertising and goodwill from sponsoring students. They also have the start of relationships and lots of information about students. For example students that collaborate with Google and receive grants from Google will be more likely to apply to work for Google and their work will bring them to the attention of Google. 350k of tax deductible cash isn't that much. Universities easily get locked into proprietary software. They are big customers of XP and Office. A huge amount of specialised proprietary software is discounted to universities to get it being used. Only a small amount of funding is needed and a little pushing is needed to get the GPL to turn (computer science departments of) universities into armies of FOSS coders.

      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
  29. A prediction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I know it doesn't pay a prophet to be too specific, but I really believe that in 10 years time, open source will be the default licensing model for commercial software, and closed source will be an oddity.

    Companies will still make money by selling software, and copyright will still protect the source and binary code, but everything will be a little more open; people won't trust code so much, so they'll insist on seeing it; there won't be any trade secrets in open source; interoperability will be key.

  30. Meh, give 'em a break. by game+kid · · Score: 1

    After having three Microsoft articles in a ROW yesterday (or the day before?), we oughta give GOOG some (more) time.

    Read a random Google page while you wait for that precious non-Google story, I guess...

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  31. Open Source Zealot (not z34107) by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    What was that, Addain? I thought that code in and of itself was neither inherently good nor inherently evil. Lollercost, here I was thinking it was just human-readable instructions to a interpreter/compiler. I suppose closed source might be evil, insofar that "they" (the man, or men? Penguins, maybe.... shift+1) would force only evil source to close itself...

    But then again, you could just be a zealot nerd (not affiliated with myself, of course) who believes that anyone trying to make money is somehow evil. This is worse than when you commies flouridated our water to weaken our resolve and corrupt our youth. >.<

    I'm sorry. If Bill Gates molestered you when you were young, I shouldn't mock your psychological trauma. </flame>

    Anyway..... I still don't get the "holy-war" thing. The instant MICRO$OFT Windows stops being worth $money++, people will stop paying $money and get Linux, or whatever alternatives there are. I mean, it would be a great day for both camps to admit that Windows is a good desktop OS and that Linux runs servers goodly. Then the healing could begin. Heck, if both Windows and Linux camps keep acting so extreme, everyone may just get pissed off and buy a Mac.... And then I'd have to hunt you down. :-D I have my own holy war against Apple to wage....

    By the way, can anyone tell me if the W3C deprecated the <flame> tag for some kinda stylesheet? I'd like to know for future rants, 'k thx

    Please don't eat my soul <3 moderators

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
    1. Re:Open Source Zealot (not z34107) by Aadain2001 · · Score: 1

      LOL, my comment ment to be exactly as it was rated: funny. It was a small jab at the mentality here on /., not what I believe is an iron clad rule in the real world.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    2. Re:Open Source Zealot (not z34107) by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      LOL, so was mine. I assume that all people here are kidding/joking until proven otherwise. I mean, really, who could like open source! :-D

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    3. Re:Open Source Zealot (not z34107) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not inherintly evil or good? Ever heard of malware? Virii? And to combat those forces of evil, we have spyware removers and anti-virus software. d-:

    4. Re:Open Source Zealot (not z34107) by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      Malware and virii are evil. Your for and return statements are not plotting to take over the world, though. They just sit around, waiting to be turned into native code for the CPU to crunch.

      So, programmers and programs can be evil. Code isn't, be it open or closed source.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
  32. In other news... by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

    A chair flung towards Oregon was spotted at Microsoft's Redmond,WA headquarters.

    --
    "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
  33. News at 10 by Comatose51 · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news, Oregon authorities have advised Oregon residents to keep an eye out for chairs being lobbed across the Oregon-Washington state border and are advised to duck.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    1. Re:News at 10 by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      ...and are advised to duck.

      No! Ducks are the other school. They should be advised to Beaver.

      --
      That is all.
    2. Re:News at 10 by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      Beaver, I dont even know her

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
  34. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MOD PARENT UP!

  35. Microsoft and Benderyishness by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    Despite generally being stubborn, Microsoft does bend when it's in its benefit. Remember t3h "glory days" of Windows 95? They were pushing their own communications standard incompatible with TCP/IP. However, when they were getting left out in the cold, they adopted TCP/IP and shipped it with Windows.

    My point is that Microsoft's primary source of income is Microsoft Office, as Office promotes Windows. Nice synergies. Open-sourcing something would vastly increase the number of the masses using the software (as opposed to charging great $money). As soon as it becomes cost effective Microsoft will support OPEN SOURCE, if only to increase the distribution of one of their OS or Office platforms.

    <THE POINT> Microsoft will do all it can to benefit open source, as soon as its profitable. And that will be the golden age of open source, because when its profitable for Microsoft it will be profitable for all companies and damned near everything will be open source.

    Ever think that all open-sourcey people might just be scared of the Windows API? :-D

    Oh, and I am a proud Microsoft Zealot, although don't have anything against Linux. Let the best OS and the best coders win.

    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
    1. Re:Microsoft and Benderyishness by killjoe · · Score: 1

      "My point is that Microsoft's primary source of income is Microsoft Office, "

      Last I checked it was windows.

      "Ever think that all open-sourcey people might just be scared of the Windows API? :-D"

      It never occured to me. I doubt it since MS is in the process of throwing it away anyway. The API is a great tool for them because it prevents competition but I don't think anybody in the open source world is afraid of it or even wants to deal with it (although some have to).

      --
      evil is as evil does
    2. Re:Microsoft and Benderyishness by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      The API is a great tool for them because it prevents competition

      Err... the API in and of itself does not stifle competition. It's an Applications Programming Interface - it just allows you to write Windows programs (with the cool titlebar an' everything), and a fancy acronym for a set of functions designed to let your program talk to Windows.

      I doubt it since MS is in the process of throwing it (the API) away anyway

      Not *exactly* true. Granted, Windows Vista is using Avalon instead of the API to create a 3D GUI needing a 256MB video card to render. However, because the Windows API has been around since the dawn of time (by "dawn of time" I mean "Windows 3.1") it's unlikely to go away soon, and is still supported by Vista. Remember, every Windows program for the past decade has been written with the API, and no-one's going to throw it away and break every Window's app in existence.

      I don't think anybody in the open source world is afraid of it

      Just flaming again. :P From what I've seen, open-sourcers are quite competent coders, and mastery of the API is not above any competent programmer's understanding. It *is* a pain, but it's just a new programming paradigm - in Soviet Union (Windows 95 and up) your program doesn't call Windows, Windows calls you(r program)!

      And, Office generates more revenue than Windows. Cheers, and bow down to the Microsoft Zealot!

      Or, just don't eat his soul.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    3. Re:Microsoft and Benderyishness by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
      "My point is that Microsoft's primary source of income is Microsoft Office, "

      Last I checked it was windows.

      MS Office and MS Windows are still the only profitable lines they have going. However, MS Windows sales are nearly 100% from OEM sales and MS Office are about 70%.

      It seems that the sale of new machines has been more than a little flat the last 5 years, so where is the money coming from? Is it magic Enron money magicked into place by cooking the books? Or is much of it made by buying and selling its own company stock? In that case, a flat or sinking stock price will be taking its toll as well.

      --
      Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  36. Ya, like Google earth. by thirdrock · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ya, dat Google loves open source.

    That's why every piece of software they make only runs on WinXP.

    Bah.

    --
    >>
    I am the director, and this is my movie ...
  37. wheres GOOG heading? by mayhemt · · Score: 0

    Google is in a littly hurry. The recent bull activity has made google's market cap close to 100bil$$$, but with only ~4bil$ sales (source: yahoo finance).
    Google has some catch up to do. Slowly it IS accepting the corporate aggresiveness many thought to be strange thing for google. In the run, it had to embrace open source, the classified ad service & other avenues (of course, I appreciate the innovation & steps) which were not in the path of big players (read:MS). Ad service would a give a break to the normal users from ebay's near monopoly of bidding/classified business. Open source would hit MS & other commercial players. I believe Google would team up with (for now I think of) Sun's Openoffice to give a deep impact to MS, thus making an entry into software promotions as well.

  38. Google and Synergies by Z34107 · · Score: 1

    Good point. Google's rumored free, online Office app could cripple Microsoft. Sure, once again, no revenue, but more text ads.

    And, anyone who's seen Googlezon knows that Google and Amazon are not competing. :-D

    Once again, don't eat my soul.
    --
    DATABASE WOW WOW
  39. Gotcher Back... by chrisd · · Score: 1
    --
    Co-Editor, Open Sources
    Open Source Program Manager, Google, Inc.
    1. Re:Gotcher Back... by beefypirate · · Score: 1

      *sniff* *single tear* I love you, Google.

    2. Re:Gotcher Back... by Anonymous+Freak · · Score: 1

      That's funny. Neither Oregon State nor Portland State are on the list.

      Hrm. A close friend of mine is a CS graduate from Oregon State, and is currently taking 'Classical Languages' at Portland State. Maybe she should sign up. Oh, wait... Her 'Classical Languages' program is Greek and Latin, not Pascal and Ada. (Yes, she has a CS degree, and is now pursuing archaeology as a career.)

      --
      Another non-functioning site was "uncertainty.microsoft.com."
      The purpose of that site was not known.
  40. well, they do by zogger · · Score: 2, Informative

    MS has long offered subsidised software to capture hearts and minds to schools. For years and years. Apple has, too. Go to local computer store, note MS retail prices, then check colleges discounts prices. They do the same with libraries, etc as well. And when they lost the anti trust case,(while still maintaining the monopoly OS install in most mainstream vendors retailed computers for some reason...) the so called "fine" was to subsidise software at free or cheap to schools mostly. I mean, really....google dropping 350 thou on encouraging open source is a joke compared to what MS has dropped.

    1. Re:well, they do by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      Oh really? How much money do you think it cost MS to give software away for free? Hint: It's prob around the cost of the cd it's put on.

      But hey, if we're talking about giving free software away for free, hasn't google done something like that before... what is it.... oh ya! it's that thing i use 23048912 times a day!

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
  41. TV Markets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Google is going into Oregon just because it will be on TV for thousands of MS employees to see. And then Billy G will buy the TV stations like Howard Hughes just to silence this issue. :)

  42. Pretty significant. by elgee · · Score: 1

    It will be a minor miracle if the state of Washington does something similar.

  43. Why Not? by Kickboy12 · · Score: 1

    With all these Google-related articles now days, why not just make a new Slashdot section?

    I now endorse google.slashdot!

  44. Get that anti-Google.... by divisivemind · · Score: 1

    To Slashdot moderators/editors/readers: Get that Anti-Google icon ready for all the future anti-google stories we'll see in about 3 years or so. Think along the lines of that Gate-monocle look.. Then again, Google will probably just buy Slashdot, so don't bother =)

    --
    Blog: http://richardrandomrants.blogspot.com/
  45. GOOGLE GOOGLE GOOGLE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot.

    News about Google. And some other stuff that matters.

  46. Possible the dumbest Slashdot title ever by Nailer · · Score: 1

    Pretty sure the Open Source Initiative already exists, guys. Could somebody with a passing knowledge of this site's audience please edit submissions?

  47. So when is OSU going to use open source itself? by MichaelPenne · · Score: 1
    Seems contradictory.

    If Google wants to promote OSS, why not support Cal State, which is using OS directly for learning management systems, at CSU San Francisco and CSU Humboldt?

    It works, too:-)

  48. RTFA: OSU nor UofO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Home of OSU Open Source Lab:
    http://osuosl.org/

    Go Beavs!

  49. Google Domination by z3usy · · Score: 0

    (((((google talk + frappr + blogspot) / myspace) + gmail + google earth) * dark fiber google owns) + google secure wifi app) + some random cellular provider = (google-net enabled wireless pda/celluar service) + (google-net network structure - microsoft)

    --
    z3uS -zNet- http://z3us.net/
  50. Re:Google mentioned more than Yahoo or Linux in Oc by BESTouff · · Score: 1

    Easy workaround: Linux has to team up with YaHoo!!! if it ever wants to make the headlines again.

  51. Open Source Hardware. A Concrete Example by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There was a company that made accelerators for the Amiga.
    You could download the masks for the circut board,
    and populate it yourself. You could get the PAL equations,
    and make your own PALs or get the kit. ( The designs, documentation, and software are STILL ONLINE! )

    ( look for Amiga Accelerator Lucas )

    There are also many many electronic projects that are maded this way.
    This is how Electronic Projects for Musicians got started, with Craig Andertons book.

  52. is M$ starting to ph34r Google yet? by Dimble+ThriceFoon · · Score: 1

    if not, they should be! BWAHAHAHAHA

  53. Buying the silence of critics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The reason Google invests so much in "Summer of Code" open source and this recent Oregon initiative is to buy silence from critics.

    This is because Google relies on its software patent regarding PageRank (named after Larry Page, the co-founder of Google), which is the fundamental reason why Google's search results are better than the competition's. Yet software patents are evil and are opposed by the open source crowd.

    By giving money to the open source crowd, Google is trying to buy their silence and support.

    Judging from the number of times Google has appeared on Slashdot, which is part of the "Open Source Technology Group", Google's ruse appears to be working.

    1. Re:Buying the silence of critics by Aadain2001 · · Score: 1

      This is a interesting point. There are definatly some people in the FOSS crowd that do believe that all software patents are evil and all source code should be free. But I'm not one of those. I think that something like PageRank is definately worthy of a patent. It's very none-obvious, very specifically defined and implemented. This is what patents where created to protect. The real problem is the people who patent ideas like "using a computer to buy goods online for delivery", which are so obvious as to be laughable to try and patent. These kind of patents hurt the industry and consumers, with only the lawyers coming out ahead. But PageRank is a very smart piece of coding and a very good concept, not the typical general/obvious software patents that you hear about on /. all the time.

      --
      Space for rent, inquire within
    2. Re:Buying the silence of critics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's very none-obvious, very specifically defined and implemented.


      Actually, Larry Page didn't the get idea out of thin air; he got the idea by looking at the results output by the Alta Vista search engine. That search engine produced resultant URLs, which in turn were accompanied by a listing of the pages that linked to each resultant URL. To create a statistic from these pages is actually pretty obvious.
  54. For Those Of You Wondering Where Oregon Is by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

    It's where Washingtonians and Californians go to skip paying sales tax.

    Seriously though, Oregon is great. Love those Pacific beaches and if you ever wanted to know where nowhere is at, take a drive on U.S. 395 from Pendleton to Alturas, California.

    --
    What?
  55. Re:Google mentioned more... by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

    "Interestingly, Slashdot had a Google story 22 times since Oct 1. Yahoo had 3 times and Linux 21 times."

    Maybe there were no more than 3 interesting news pieces about Yahoo. I don't say that all 22 stories about Google were either, but most of them were news for nerds, stuff that matter.

    --
    "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
  56. Speaking of open hardware & something we need. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want a little graphics gizmo that I can attach to the display port of an LCD or PDP that connects the display to the network and includes a network-upgradeable X server. The display needs to be a network resource. Every device that used to be a peripheral has become more useful when turned into a network resource. The display is no exception.

  57. And in other news.... by adnausium · · Score: 1

    Google announced during a press conference today their intentions to institute a program to bolster world employment rates by paying teens to help old ladies cross the street & cover puddles with jackets for women. The conference ended on a high note, with Google representitives passing out free kittens.

    --
    Don't ya hate it when the correct spelling of your favorite screen name is taken?
  58. not the same, not even close by zogger · · Score: 1

    You are equating an ad sponsored search engine on a browser to a monopoly desktop operating system that comes pre installed on the vast bulk of the worlds computers? These are supposed to be equivalent somehow? Sorry, not seeing it. MS was convicted of abusing it's status in the market place, violating the law, and their so called "fine" boiled down to further entrenching themselves into the market place by using their software as "legal tender". If YOU got fined by the government, wouldn't you like to be told to keep doing what you have been doing as the punishment? Be able to just print up something, give it an inflated monetary value, and "pay the fine" that way? Who else gets a deal like that? The other example I can think of is some of the **AA media distributors got busted for collusion and the "fine" was they got to dump old tunes that hardly anyone wanted, clean out the backrooms in the warehouses, to libraries and etc. That was covered here sometime back, sorry no link handy.

    Anyway, the discussion was about how allegedly "wrong" it was for google to fund some open source projects, to the tune of 350 grand. I disagreed that it was wrong. MS has been subsidising their closed source expensive products for years now, in the schools, in a very obvious attempt to capture hearts and minds so that down the road they can maintain monopoly status. Certainly if all these places paid full retail like the prices you see at the computer shops the numerical value would be vastly more than 350 grand, and the difference is, MS furthers a lock in, contravening the entire exercise of their monopoly abuse and investigations and alleged punishment. THAT is the difference so far in a general political and ethical sense, although apparently not in any common sense law enforcement actions. I am suspicious of that as well, that perhaps some...consulting fees...changed hands someplace. Obviously can't prove it of course, merely suspicious of it. I never had anything against MS until it became obvious what business slimeballs they were and still are, THEY changed my mind about them. In the earlier days, meh, a software company. Then it comes out over the years that there isn't a sleazy trick they won't pull, multiple times. Basically, lying bullies, strong arm goons.

        When and if google gets busted and loses in court for abusing their services in some manner, then we can discuss some sort of parity situation, now though, it is two different things. I have some issues with google as well, but at this time on the ethics scale I'll still put them head and shoulders over MS.

    1. Re:not the same, not even close by Braino420 · · Score: 1

      summary pls, thnx

      --
      They call me the wookie man, I guess that's what I am
  59. Microsoft and openness by tinku99 · · Score: 1

    Despite being a libertarian, I've been brainwashed almost thoroughly by slashdot into a bias against Microsoft. So, I was surprised that www.ocw.mit.edu is published using Microsoft software: this from their FAQ, at http://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Global/OCWHelp/help.htm# 25 "30. What technology is used to publish the MIT OCW Web site? The MIT OCW technology solution supports a complex publishing process. This is a large-scale digital publishing infrastructure that consists of planning tools, a content management system (CMS), and the MIT OCW content distribution infrastructure. The current technical solution has been in use since April 2003 with a four-person technical support team managing all aspects of this infrastructure. The planning tools used by the MIT OCW team to assist faculty in publishing their course materials include a custom application of FileMaker Pro, and several checklists and documents. For creating and managing content, we use several desktop tools (file conversion tools) as well as the CMS, an extensively customized version of Microsoft Content Management Server 2002 that fully supports our publishing process. Our content delivery infrastructure includes a sophisticated publishing engine, content staging server, and a content delivery network utilizing Akamai's EdgeSuite platform."

  60. this proves by PermanentMarker · · Score: 1

    Well finnaly something that does proof, there is no such thing such as inteligent design

    --
    I know you're out there. I can feel you now. I know that you're afraid. You're afraid of us. You're afraid of change.
  61. What is Google smoking? by matthew_t_west · · Score: 1

    Come to Oregon and find out! There's a lot going for this state. Not only does Google plan to open a site in the Dalles, but Linus Torvalds lives in Lake Oswego. Wireless connectivity is almost ubiquitous, and there's a ton of great beer here.

    So why pay sales tax and work in California or Washington, when you can live in Oregon? Although BEWARE! It rains a lot here (wink, wink, nudge, nudge!) PDX LUV, sucka.

    --
    Browse at 1. You'll thank me later.