Slashdot Mirror


aMSN 0.95 Released

An anonymous reader writes "After more than a year since their last update aMSN has published version 0.95. New features include 'webcam support, tabbed chat windows, improved skin plugin support, new file transfer protocol, many new plugins (like Ink and Nudge support), an improved bug report system, as well as LOTS of bug fixes.' In addition to many new features and fixes the aMSN site has been given a face lift to (hopefully) facilitate ease of use."

213 comments

  1. slow downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My download from sourceforge is going at 5kb/s, any mirrors aside from the official one linked on the amsn site?

    1. Re:slow downloads by WTBF · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why not try a different source forge mirror? One of them must work at a decent speed.

      Here is the sourceforge download page, following which you can select a mirror from.

    2. Re:slow downloads by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      http://amsn.sourceforge.net.nyud.net:8090/

      http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net.nyud.net:8090/a msn/amsn-0.95-windows-installer.exe

      http://amsn.sourceforge.net.nyud.net:8090/linux-do wnloads.php?PHPSESSID=5fefd10a127e798524de53a4088e 9433

      http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net.nyud.net:8090/a msn/amsn-0-95-final.dmg

      http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net.nyud.net:8090/a msn/amsn-0.95.tar.gz

      http://amsn.sourceforge.net.nyud.net:8090/amsn_cvs .tar.gz

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
    3. Re:slow downloads by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      I think the sslashdot effect has passed. Download going pretty fast for me, and I'm downloading from Europe.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  2. More features than Gaim by LinuxDon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After having taken a look on their website, aMSN seems to support more MSN features than Gaim: File transfers, webcam.

    Anyone who knows more about the specific advantages?

    1. Re:More features than Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know a specific disadvantage, it's a tcl script ffs.

    2. Re:More features than Gaim by Rob_Ogilvie · · Score: 1

      I don't know about webcam support (I don't care for webcams, myself) - but Gaim has supported file transfers for a long time. Lately, these file transfers have even been able to get through my NAT firewall. Yes, even with MSN.

      --
      Rob
    3. Re:More features than Gaim by LinuxDon · · Score: 2, Informative

      True, Gaims supports MSN file transfer, but not directly P2P (which is why they pass your NAT firewall fine).
      Unfortunately, sending a file trough a Microsoft MSN server makes the tranfer go *VERY* slow.

      It appears aMSN supports direct file transfers.

    4. Re:More features than Gaim by emeshuris · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use trillian. Personally I think this is one of the best im clients available. It works with everything. I have been using it for a very long time. Transfers from msn, never work for me through trillian, and it does not have the terminal services abilities of msn messenger.

    5. Re:More features than Gaim by moro_666 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ffs it's a chat client, it doesn't need to be written in C ...

      don't you think it's actually pretty rational that something as easy as a damn msn client is written in a language that makes the code 3-5 times shorter and easier to read ? many of your favourite tools in linux are written in C or use a bash scripts to start up complicated applications, i see no whiners there ...

      anyway, my problem is that amsn has crashed a lot on me. the tcl/tk has had issues with 2.6.x kernel line and tended to deadlock after some point. amsn ran fine with 2.4.x kernel line, but since 2.6.x came along it has been rather unstable and thats why i use gaim right now.

      however, gaim is YEARS back in it's msn support and amsn obviously is ahead here.

      --

      I'd tell you the chances of this story being a dupe, but you wouldn't like it.
    6. Re:More features than Gaim by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It works with everything" ... "never work for me through trillion"

      Um, that is either a contradiction or although I don't drink I've hit the scotch too early today.

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    7. Re:More features than Gaim by emeshuris · · Score: 1

      Transfers do not work because of firewall settings. Besides, I would rather use different transfer mechanisms than msn transfers.

    8. Re:More features than Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've hit the Scotch too early. If you can't parse that simple paragraph sleep it off then try again.

    9. Re:More features than Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, gotta agree with the GP. That's either a terrible sentance or a total contradiction.

    10. Re:More features than Gaim by c_forq · · Score: 1

      Works with everything refers to Yahoo, AIM, MSN, Jabber, IRC, etc. etc. etc.
      Works with everything does not mean utilizes all features, as Trillian doesn't support the Avatar stuff Yahoo has, nudge or animation things MSN has, and I'm sure it's missing things MSN has.

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    11. Re:More features than Gaim by kevv · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This client also lacks in features that MSN Messenger has... I say this in a good way. No spammy tabs on the left, no advertising on the bottom, no tricking computer illiterate people in paying for smileys or other charging services.

    12. Re:More features than Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey, there is a workaround to make amsn stable in 2.6 kernels. Ask in amsn forums as I don't know what is that.

      But it exists. I uses it in 2.6 kernels from ages and it's pretty-stable.

    13. Re:More features than Gaim by Azarael · · Score: 1

      The poster is right, when I was using trillian, msn transfers didn't work unless you had port forwarding set up on your router.

    14. Re:More features than Gaim by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      "It works with everything."

      But does it run on linux?

    15. Re:More features than Gaim by emeshuris · · Score: 1

      Dont know, I dont use linux, im a lowly ms developer.

    16. Re:More features than Gaim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a rhetorical question. I knows full well it does not.

      I was a commonly made joke to suggest that trillian isn't relevant because there is no source code. You must be new here. ;)

    17. Re:More features than Gaim by jZnat · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking the main reason that clients like aMSN, Psi, Xchat, etc., can become so much better than the Gaim version is that Gaim concentrates on a broad range of clients while aMSN can concentrate on only the MSN protocol. Better focus and whatnot.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    18. Re:More features than Gaim by neonmagic · · Score: 0

      amsn runs fine here on a Libranet GNU/Linux box. Running 0.94-3. Haven't had it crash or freeze in at least 4-6 months now, the stability issues that were present a year or so ago are now all fixed as far as I'm concerned. Maybe you're using a really bad Linux distribution that doesn't package things very well? Dave

      --
      Slashdot can go and get fucked.
    19. Re:More features than Gaim by mrjb · · Score: 1

      It must've been a while since you used Gaim. File transfers are working nowadays (although still a bit flaky for large files).

      Never mind the latest and greatest. Although I may not be able to have webcam chats with all my contacts, at least I can contact them without cluttering my screen with 3 different messengers.

      Now that some new features have been built in into the open-source application aMSN, the source code for these features is available and I expect that other messengers, including Gaim, will soon follow suit. After all, the reverse engineering has been done. Aaah, the beauty of community-supported software...

      --
      Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    20. Re:More features than Gaim by Aurix · · Score: 1
      the source code for these features is available and I expect that other messengers, including Gaim, will soon follow suit

      Errr, Gaim is open source...
    21. Re:More features than Gaim by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 1

      anyway, my problem is that amsn has crashed a lot on me. the tcl/tk has had issues with 2.6.x kernel line and tended to deadlock after some point. amsn ran fine with 2.4.x kernel line, but since 2.6.x came along it has been rather unstable and thats why i use gaim right now.

      I had the same problem. Reverting Tcl from version 8.4 to version 8.3 solved it. It's written somewhere but I don't remember where ...

    22. Re:More features than Gaim by schlenk · · Score: 1

      Tcl/Tk does not really have a problem with kernel 2.6, AFAIK its a glibc bug in the thread implementation which interacts with a newer kernel threading model and causes threaded Tcl/Tk builds to hang. (java hangs in similar ways...). Primitive workaround is to use the non-threaded builds of Tcl/Tk which are faster anyway. (Debian is currently the only distro which builds a threaded Tcl 8.4 as default due to the aolserver package needing a threaded Tcl, but threaded Tcl will probably become default with Tcl 8.5)

    23. Re:More features than Gaim by Marlow+the+Irelander · · Score: 1

      That wasn't his point. He was saying that now aMSN's developed the feature, Gaim can reuse the code and support features that they don't currently have (e.g. webcams, unless gaim-vv's been fully merged yet).

  3. OK, there is NO WAY... by mcg1969 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    this software is going to be able to keep its name if it gets even remotely popular. I can't help but think Microsoft will come down on him hard.

    1. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by LinuxDon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember that up till now, Microsoft has not really done anything harsh to any opensource project.
      And, since this is not commercial software, the odds are that they don't really care too much.
      Especially now, when they are having such a hard time with all of the monopoly lawsuits.

    2. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by AWhiteFlame · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're go the GAIM way. Noo, the AIM part is just general, its not an acronym.

      --
      "Everything worth innovating today will go to court tomorrow."
    3. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by mpontes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Easy. All they have to do is say that aMSN is an acronym for Alvaro's MeSseNger and that it has nothing to do with MicroSoft Network.

      --
      Bored? Browse Slashdot with a +6 modifier for Troll comme
    4. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by rbochan · · Score: 1

      Why, because Microsoft worries about bad PR or something?

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    5. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt its legal as it is.
        Same with gaim and other alternative clients, unless they got some sort of agreement with M$. Basically its resource theft. M$ runs a service for their customers under their terms, and now others just hog on it, without "paying" for it by the ads and links to other services.

      I know this is slashdot and MS is the enemy, but that doesnt justify it.

      But i guess this kind of parasiting is legal when its convenient for linux users ?

    6. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by johansalk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Microsoft intimidated the virtualdub author about asf support so he had to remove it.

    7. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why the fuck is this off topic.

      it is completly relevent to aMSN

      morons

    8. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by gkhan1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you say Lindows?

    9. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by mpontes · · Score: 1
      Err, redundant maybe, because someone already pointed that they'd only gave to go the GAIM way, but Offtopic? Wait, let me try this again:

      "Hay guyz, does any1 use msn, anyway? aim ftw!"

      Is this on topic now? I love it how the obligatory "AIM vs MSN vs whatever" debate that pops up every time an article about an IM network is posted is rated Insightful, but a comment talking about the specific software whose release the article talked about is modded Offtopic.

      --
      Bored? Browse Slashdot with a +6 modifier for Troll comme
    10. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a hint from Eminem: eMesSeM

    11. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by rm69990 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lindows is a company, a company that even develops proprietary software alongside open source software. Lindows was not, is not, nor will it ever be an "open source project". It was a commercial company that was gunning straight for Microsoft's market, using a very similarly named product. I won't go into the whole "is Windows a valid trademark" thing though.

    12. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like Mike Rowe Soft, eh?

    13. Re:OK, there is NO WAY... by Overly+Critical+Guy · · Score: 1

      But it would be a lie to say it has nothing to do with the Microsoft Network, since it is connecting to the Microsoft Network...

      That's like making aSlashdot.org which grabs and displays Slashdot's stories, then saying the name has nothing to do with Slashdot.

      --
      "Sufferin' succotash."
  4. Gaim? MS-messenger? by glomph · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What really is interesting is the islands of usage in the different IM systems. I use Gaim exclusively, have something like 250 buddies in the aggregate list, of which about a third are active. 90+% of them are AIM. Small number are Yahoo. MSN users countable on the fingers of one mutilated hand.

  5. Website? Looks bad. by vidarlo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really. They've got a nice website. But it requires javascript for downloading, it is broken in my Firefox, bypasses SF's default mirror system (which is bad in my eyes because it makes downloads potentially slower). So whilst I've not tested amsn itself, the website needs work.

    1. Re:Website? Looks bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What version of firefox are you using?

      Windows Firefox 1.5 looks fine.

    2. Re:Website? Looks bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FF 1.0.7 it seems. I can't see any reason for why they use javascript though... Some screw-ups in the layout can be expected, but they should try a bit in old ff's.

    3. Re:Website? Looks bad. by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 4, Informative

      The mirror system is bypassed because the packages haven't been synced to all servers yet. If we were to use the mirrors, you would be getting mirror failed messages for most.

      --
      Cheers,
      RoadkillBunny
    4. Re:Website? Looks bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hi,
      we bypassed the mirroring system because the file hasn't spread through sourceforge's mirrors yet.. we never thought he download links would die.. never expected getting almost 1GB downloads a minute... now it's back to using the mirroring system (osdn.dl mirror is down it seems...) but it will take you half an hour just to find a mirror which hold the file (depends on luck...)
      about being broken in FF, we spent days and days JUST to get it rendering correctly on all browsers.. could you tell us with more details what problem you get ?
      about javascript.. I'll look into that, but I remember we were removing javascript in favor of php... I'll see if all javascript can be removed!

    5. Re:Website? Looks bad. by vidarlo · · Score: 1
      The mirror system is bypassed because the packages haven't been synced to all servers yet. If we were to use the mirrors, you would be getting mirror failed messages for most.

      Ok, but why use javascript to select download then? You could at least provide a go-buttion, for those without javascript.

      Besides, tabbing is nice. However, I found no way to switch tabs with keyboard, and stretching for the mouse is painful (yes, I do use ratpoison), it is ugly when running in smal windows (the buttons and such fall outside the border of the window). So, if I'm gonna consider it instead of gaim:

      • proper keyboard bindings
      • better installation system. make install installed a whole lots of files in 700 mode, owned by root. Not executable by user. make rpm also failed. When chmod'd, amsn complained about no read access to a couple of files: I had to install it manually. Polish make install.
      • Webcam support is very nice. However, I have a v4l device, which amsn did not find. I did not care to research into this, so it is probably my own fault anyway...

      In short, some ironing needed before it is ready for mainstream. But it is the msn client for *nix closest to Microsoft's msn client. Keep up on the good work :)

    6. Re:Website? Looks bad. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      the website needs work

      By the sound of things, it needs less work.

    7. Re:Website? Looks bad. by vidarlo · · Score: 1
      hi, we bypassed the mirroring system because the file hasn't spread through sourceforge's mirrors yet.. we never thought he download links would die.. never expected getting almost 1GB downloads a minute... now it's back to using the mirroring system (osdn.dl mirror is down it seems...) but it will take you half an hour just to find a mirror which hold the file (depends on luck...) about being broken in FF, we spent days and days JUST to get it rendering correctly on all browsers.. could you tell us with more details what problem you get ? about javascript.. I'll look into that, but I remember we were removing javascript in favor of php... I'll see if all javascript can be removed!

      Javascript is not bad by it self, but please, provide a way for those surfin with javascript turned off. I accept that some people enjoy it, but make it possible to get your product without javascript. Add a nice Go-button :)

      And for the firefox problems... I have not looked into it, but I provided a screen shot. Feel free to contact me though. Email address is at my userpage.

    8. Re:Website? Looks bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? I'm running FF 1.5 with NoScript, with SourceForge definitely not allowed. The download does not seem to require any kind of javascript to work, the site renders just fine, and the mirrors are certainly functioning properly. ::confused::

  6. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by WTBF · · Score: 4, Informative

    In different areas different systems are popular. In Britain it seems as if MSN is used almost exclusively, and I know only two people who use different networks, although I am now using Google Talk with a few converts from MSN - so that is six more people off MSN messenger. However, I know a lot of American people that use AIM, and MSN seems (as you said) to be somewhat of a rarity.

  7. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a joke in there somewhere about how many of those 250 buddies are girls that can be counted on the fingers of one, mutilated, oiled hand.

  8. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Over here in England MSN Messenger easily has the majority, probably 80+%.

  9. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by bogado · · Score: 1

    In Brazil, unfortunaly, there are lots of MSN users, and as far as I know it is very popular in France also. I believe that it got late in the IM business, but since it get bundled with windows it has conquered the places where the public didn[ t yet have a favorite IM.

    --
    []'s Victor Bogado da Silva Lins

    ^[:wq

  10. Website Design by vectorian798 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Something messed up with their JS? On Firefox their menu renders into the middle of the page, but it looks fine on IE...

  11. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Justin205 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Very true. Canada seems to be going much the same way as Britain. Most people I know in Canada use MSN messenger exclusively. Whereas more of the people I know online (mainly Americans) tend towards AIM and/or YIM.

    It's really interesting, actually... To talk to people all over the world you generally need AIM and MSN. Perhaps YIM, but the people who *only* use YIM are few and far between.

    --
    "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  12. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It would be nice to make a map with the geographical spread.

    I live in Brazil. My only exclusively-AIM-or-Yahoo contacts are from people in the US. Most of my list is still ICQ because that was the "big one" here years ago, and I say "still" because most new users go to MSN and lots of the ICQ "early adopters" (me included) now have MSN accounts as well. So, I guess in order of popularity, it's:

    USA: AIM, Yahoo, MSN, ICQ
    Brazil: MSN, ICQ, AIM, Yahoo

    Other countries, anyone?

  13. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by acoster · · Score: 3, Funny

    MSN is amanzingly popular among the "average" users, and got really strong in Brasil after the launch of Windows XP. They did some TV ads too, but I think that the damn man-in-butterfly-costume scared normal people ;-)

    --
    "Go forth, and be excellent to each other" --Bill & Ted
  14. i don't get it... by twiggy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So, it's just a clone of MSN written by someone else, still for windows?

    Why is this a big deal?

    If it offered multiple clients like Trillian does, or had some snazzy features that MSN didn't already have, I could see it being big news...

    Strange indeed, seeing as MSN is probably the least popular messenger between AIM/Yahoo/MSN... I just don't understand the motivation behind writing a clone. Anyone see something I'm missing?

    --
    http://www.babysmasher.com
    http://www.openingbands.com
    1. Re:i don't get it... by Yoohoo+Ladies! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't know... just about everyone I know uses MSN... I prefer ICQ myself, though. I've got 90+ contacts through MSN... maybe three in AOL. But I'm Canada, so maybe that explains the difference?

    2. Re:i don't get it... by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Strange indeed, seeing as MSN is probably the least popular messenger between AIM/Yahoo/MSN..

      In the US perhaps.. In europe ICQ was pretty much "The" IM until Microsoft's bundling of MSN Messenger attracted the dimwitted hordes of teenagers, at this point anyone wanting to contact any of these people would use MSN Messenger (since before this point not a lot of people were using IM software) and this in turn led to a situation where only "nerds" were using ICQ and most of them ended up getting an MSN account just to be able to keep in touch with their friends..

      Now if only Microsoft could get offline messages for MSN Messenger I wouldn't mind this situation but it seems they think "E-mail = offline message"..

      /Mikael

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    3. Re:i don't get it... by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Informative

      IIRC, the motivation was to write a complete MSN Messenger clone that would run outside Windows - i've tried it a few times on Linux, and while i like GAIM much better, it really feels and behaves like the official client. It might help non-techincal users that need MSN to switch easier.

    4. Re:i don't get it... by mqduck · · Score: 2, Informative

      So, it's just a clone of MSN written by someone else, still for windows?

      The website's messed up, but you can get the linux version on the SF page: http://sourceforge.net/projects/amsn

      --
      Property is theft.
    5. Re:i don't get it... by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      At least for me, trillian ended the which ICQ/msn/aol is better debate.

    6. Re:i don't get it... by orasio · · Score: 1

      Popularity doesn't matter when the person you are trying to contact uses the least popular system.
      Plus, no one I know uses AIM.
      Maybe it's a US thing.

      I use GAIM most of the time (msn, in-house jabber server, jabber.org, yahoo messenger, and now google talk).
      Most of my friends I met in college use yahoo messenger and some jabber.org or google talk. People with no computer knowledge started using MSN around me, so I got a user. Plus, we use a jabber IM server at my job, because it's handy.

      But when you want to see the face of someone across the atlantic, it's difficult to resist the temptation of installing mswindows.

      Then, aMSN comes to the rescue. You can have webcam conversations. That, added to skype, is much better to me than a phone call.
      Now that skype has webcam support, if it ever reaches gnu/linux, it might stay as the unique piece of proprietary software in my drive.

    7. Re:i don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In europe ICQ was pretty much "The" IM until Microsoft's bundling of MSN Messenger attracted the dimwitted hordes of teenagers, at this point anyone wanting to contact any of these people would use MSN Messenge

      No, ICQ was popular until it started to become one giant bloatware piece of shit, and thats not microsofts fault

    8. Re:i don't get it... by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 1

      So, it's just a clone of MSN written by someone else, still for windows?

      The point is that it's a clone of MSN for Linux. And since it uses Tcl/Tk, it can run on any operating system that supports the toolkit: Windows, Linux, Mac OS X.

      --
      Cheers,
      RoadkillBunny
    9. Re:i don't get it... by kingturkey · · Score: 2, Informative
      Now if only Microsoft could get offline messages for MSN Messenger I wouldn't mind this situation but it seems they think "E-mail = offline message"..
      Actually I'm a beta tester for Windows Live Messenger (the next version of MSN Messenger) and one of the new features is offline messages. And for everyone saying AOL is the most popular, here in Australia MSN is the main one. I don't know anyone who uses any other client exclusively. I and a few others have Google Talk but MSN is the one used most.
    10. Re:i don't get it... by tourettes · · Score: 1

      aMSN is a great client, weather you run it from Windows or Linux (or whatever other platforms it supports). I'm not quite sure the reason why it's around, but, my girlfriend uses msn, and msn only. While trying to get her into Linux, i suggested GAIM, Kopete and other messengers, but she just wanted to go back to MSN Messenger. However, once i installed aMSN, that was it, it was exactly what she was looking for. Something that looks and feels like the official client, but works in linux.

      So, you may ask yourself, what's the point of running this in windows when the official client exists? Well, some of us don't like the added bloat that the official client brings, some of us just want a slimmed down app that will allow us to chat with our msn friends that looks and feels like the official, but runs much quicker.

      And of course, there is that "geek" factor of running free software that makes us feel warm and fuzzy inside :)

      --
      tourettes
    11. Re:i don't get it... by rrich007 · · Score: 1

      Actually, the upcoming version of MSN Messenger, now named Windows Live Messenger 8 does have offline message support.

    12. Re:i don't get it... by houseofzeus · · Score: 1

      Seconded, everyone I know uses MSN these days. Before that it was ICQ.

    13. Re:i don't get it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok I won't let the joke run any longer. It was my really 5 year old sister who designed the ICQ user interface. There that feels better.

    14. Re:i don't get it... by Lobais · · Score: 1

      Seems that msn 8 will have offline messages. http://www.winsupersite.com/reviews/msn8.asp

      In Denmark it is the same picture. Once all I knew were on ICQ. Then suddenly a lot of new people found IM through MSN, and all the people who once had an ICQ got an MSN too, just to have contact to the new people. Today I know no one with ICQ, I've even disabled it on gaim, but gtalk is slowly popping up.

  15. ASL? lol u sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm not sure I want to chat with anyone that can't use an IRC or Jabber client and it's hardly as if I'm setting a high standard here.

    1. Re:ASL? lol u sux by RedBear · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure I want to chat with anyone that can't use an IRC or Jabber client and it's hardly as if I'm setting a high standard here.

      I'm not sure I want to chat with anyone that can't speak Japanese or German and it's hardly as if I'm setting a high standard here.

      What's that, you aren't well-versed in foreign languages? Well then, you must be STUPID, and therefore not worth my time.

      Last time I checked both IRC and Jabber were rather confusing to the uninitiated. IRC has the concept of dozens of different networks to connect to with no easy way for a newbie to understand what makes one network preferable over another. Then you've got to decide on a room to be in, etc. It's a whole different world from a simple chat client. I have used IRC quite successfully for a while in the past but I still don't know how it really works so I am not comfortable in that world. Plus I just didn't like real-time chat that much. Consequently I haven't used it for years.

      Last time I tried a Jabber client it had somewhat similar problems where you had to go through a whole process to figure out what server to connect to, and that's if you could even find one that supported all the different protocols you wanted to have access to. Maybe it's gotten much better since then but all I know is that at the time it was overly confusing and the available clients sucked. Judging from the page about open Jabber servers on the offician Jabber website, it doesn't look like anything has really changed. Both IRC and Jabber were always more difficult for me to configure than ICQ, MSN, AIM or Yahoo ever were. The same will hold true for any person new to the chat world.

      But no, no high standards (or high horses) here.

    2. Re:ASL? lol u sux by Vicsun · · Score: 1

      You will die alone.

  16. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by vidarlo · · Score: 1
    What really is interesting is the islands of usage in the different IM systems. I use Gaim exclusively, have something like 250 buddies in the aggregate list, of which about a third are active. 90+% of them are AIM. Small number are Yahoo. MSN users countable on the fingers of one mutilated hand.

    Yes, I agree. However, if one wants to have some of the nice features of msn (no, not nudge!), like webcam or such, you have to use amsn on anything other thatn windows. I have not used amsn for some time, but their msn support is certainly better than gaim's, but gaim aims at many protocols, not just msn. Thus, I think both has a purpose, but it is really pity that a lot of amsn's features ain't merged into gaim. Combined, it'd be helluva IM platform. Alone, gaim don't offer anything shiny for the msn protocol, and amsn don't offer anything for jabber/aim/yahoo.

    The really sad thing is that those nets is so divided. It should be like email. Anyone to anyone, regardless of supplier. Only solution to this right now seems to be jabber, which lets me connect to a single point and let that handle the other protocols.

    Luckily, google talk is using jabber:) If they just could offer a default gateway for msn, so more people got caught on google talk...

  17. Good Business Practices by Chaffar · · Score: 1
    On Firefox their menu renders into the middle of the page, but it looks fine on IE...

    Target audience:*nix users... Probability that said target audience uses IE: 0% (±0.00)

    Going IE is not always the best thing to do®, IMHO...

  18. What's the count now? by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 3, Informative

    Two, three other packages that support webcams? Where's Gaim in the webcam support arena?
    I like Gaim the best of all the packages but it's lack of webcam support is sad.
    BTW, what would be a good choice of webcam to buy for Linux that is likely
    to work well with whatever comes along? Something economical but solid.
    I don't want to waste $10 on a POS cheap cam but I don't want to spend $200 either..

    Come on Gaim, get with the program!!

    1. Re:What's the count now? by pdbogen · · Score: 2, Informative

      A firewire card and an Orange Micro iBot is a pretty good deal. No integrated microphone, but firewire web cams give excellent quality and the iBot is pretty reasonably priced. Unfortunately, it's still at the high end of pricing (You're looking at around $100 for the camera, plus say $20 for the firewire card), but well worth the money. An equivalently priced USB webcam usually won't be anywhere near as good.

    2. Re:What's the count now? by lbbros · · Score: 2, Informative

      Unfortunately this (along with file transfers) has been always labeled "low priority" by gaim developers, so unless someone starts contributing patches it's unlikely we'll see that support for a while.

      --
      A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
    3. Re:What's the count now? by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      I don't know how aMSN does it, but cross-platform camera support could be tricky, afaik.

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
    4. Re:What's the count now? by electrichamster · · Score: 1

      Gaim2 is having gaim-vv backported into it, so expect webcam support very soon.

    5. Re:What's the count now? by christoofar · · Score: 1

      The Logitech QuickCam Chat works on Linux, and works great with aMSN.

      Here's the QuickCam Chat

      And, the kernel module (2.4/2.6) for it: http://mxhaard.free.fr/download.html

      Make sure you recompile ('make menuconfig') the kernel for Video On Linux support.

      After you compile the kernel module for your box, just modprobe it in before you start the webcam feature on aMSN.

    6. Re:What's the count now? by dcclark · · Score: 1

      You might be interested to know that there is indeed a project to add webcam support to Gaim. That's their old website, the project is now merged with Gaim itself and aiming to be included in the Gaim 2.0 release (and hopefully Adium, Fire, and other libgaim-based messengers, once Gaim gets it working).

      You might also consider that Gaim supports a whole boatload of protocols whose official clients have webcam support (AIM, MSN, Yahoo for a start). It's one thing to get webcam support working on one protocol, it's quite another to get it working on all of them. From what I know of the Gaim developers, they want support across the board, not piecemeal. I can totally understand this -- if you were to implement webcam/voice support on only one protocol, people would complain more than if you hadn't done it at all!

      I don't know how many times I've written this same comment -- pretty much every single IM-related article that shows up on Slashdot has someone complaining about Gaim and voice/video without actually checking out the facts.

    7. Re:What's the count now? by roju · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wrong. There was a whole fiasco with the gaim-vv and gaim 2.0 merge. In a nutshell, the guys working on gaim-vv submitted a big patchset, the lead gaim developer got hired by Google, and now, in a weird coincidence, the gaim-vv merge is cancelled to add Google Talk voice support instead.

    8. Re:What's the count now? by lbbros · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't hold my breath yet, what I'd really like from gaim developers is a roadmap. Sometimes it's not very clear what's being developed (though for example, the rewrite of the online status handling was one of the biggest changes in gaim 2.0).

      --
      A CC-licensed illustrated horror novel
  19. Here's the working download links: by StonedRat · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
  20. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Lisandro · · Score: 1

    MSN is also disgustingly popular here in Argentina, as i hear it's all over Latin America.

  21. Torrents for windows and mac by the_y_man84 · · Score: 0
  22. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by technoviper · · Score: 1

    That may be true in the US. However in Asia and Europe a lot of users are on MSN (all my friends in the US are on AIM/iChat while my European and Asian friends are split between Yahoo and MSN)

  23. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by mpontes · · Score: 1

    The A in AIM stands for America. MSN is used almost exclusively in most European countries. In fact, in the past, I knew about the existence of MSN, Y! and ICQ, but I only found out AIM after I started talking to American people online.

    --
    Bored? Browse Slashdot with a +6 modifier for Troll comme
  24. Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by onlyjoking · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The screenshots exemplify why Linux struggles to gain mindshare amongst Windows users. Font rendering is still awful on Linux and I'm afraid it's looks that count with IM apps. The same is true of that great open source flagship, Firefox. I love using it on OS X and XP but on Linux Firefox can't render simple CSS borders nor line-spacing properly. Websites just look awful viewed with Firefox on Linux (Fedora) and aMSN suffers similar problems with its flaky text. Linux is a serer OS with a half-decent graphics engine but with browsers and IM apps half-decent isn't good enough.

    1. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by StonedRat · · Score: 2, Informative

      My fonts look a lot better than those in the aMSN screenshot, but then the screenshot shows fonts without anti-aliasing enabled. Even windows looks shit if you disable that. Personally i think my linux fonts look better than the ones i get in windows. I use ubuntu and gnome by the way.

      --
      "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." - Arthur C. Clarke.
    2. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Could you explain? I use Windows XP on my desktop and Gentoo Linux on laptop (window manager is XFCE4). They both use the same or similar true type fonts and look almost identical, except I have font AA enabled on my laptop and disabled on my desktop. (I dislike the look of font AA on a CRT.) Default install, by the way, I did not change any settings relating to fonts.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    3. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The screenshots show anti aliasing disabled, which is not the default in any GNU/Linux distribution, and hasn't been for many years now.

      Check shots.osdir.com to see how fonts are rendered by default in systems like Fedora, Ubuntu, etc.

    4. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 4, Informative

      This has been fixed in Tcl/Tk 8.5 as it uses anti-aliased fonts. It is still in beta, but feel free to try it out. http://www.tcl.tk/

      --
      Cheers,
      RoadkillBunny
    5. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by nneonneo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, it is actually possible to achieve anti-aliased rendering on Linux (not without some effort): http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/tutorials/3 093/1/

    6. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No anti-aliased fonts? 10+ years later, Linux still hasn't caught up to Win95.

      Sad.

    7. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by gmf · · Score: 1

      Huh?! The article you linked to is almost 5 years old!

      All Linux distributions I've tried recently (Debian, Ubuntu, SuSE, and others) come with anti-aliasing enabled and working by default. And it looks quite well out of the box, although it's often possible to tweak it a little more, but that's also a matter of taste.

      What actually seems to be difficult these days is completely disabling font anti-aliasing...

    8. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

      One thing that people commonly overlook is the DisplaySize option in xorg.conf. X basically has to know your monitor size in order to render fonts correctly. The fonts on my laptop looked *awful* by default...it is a 15" 1024x768 display, and since it is a laptop it only works at native resolution. The defaults likely assume your display is 1280x1024 native. Once I set this, fonts now look identical to my desktop (which uses a 17" 1280x1024 LCD) and I don't have any more strange font rendering issues. Here's an article on this often overlooked not very well documented option: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Xorg_and_Fonts

    9. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by Wikipedia · · Score: 0

      I use ClearType rendering, and it looks beautiful.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search =ClearType

      --
      P2P Anonymous Distributed Web Search: http://www.yacy.net/
    10. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Eh, I do not like the way ClearType looks on CRTs, but that is just my personal preference. It looks very nice on LCDs.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    11. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by onlyjoking · · Score: 1

      My 19" Formac is set to the correct resolution: 1280x1024. Fonts in Firefox and many other apps are dog awful. I would never recommend Firefox on Linux to anyone and I'd be embarrassed to display many websites I've designed viewed on Firefox/Linux but which display fine in Firefox/OS X or Firefox/XP. Doesn't this tell us something about Linux? Stop pretending it's there where graphics rendersing is concerned. It's light years away.

    12. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by onlyjoking · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, all I can say is that successive incarnations of Firefox on Fedora are an embarrassment. I cross my fingers that none of my clients are viewing the websites I design for them with Firefox/Linux. 1px CSS borders turn into dotted borders and line spacing is almost doubled. I'm sure if I tweaked xorg somewhere I could get it right, or maybe it's how Firefox integrates with xorg. Who knows? All I know is it ain't ready for prime time and no-one at Mozilla.org seems to care.

    13. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

      The resolution isn't the problem, it's the DisplaySize/DPI setting. Fonts on Linux work just fine if everything is configured properly. I WILL admit that it is a royal pain to configure, and sometimes you have to wade through undocumented options to do it properly, but it does work once you do. Work needs to be put toward ease of configuration, not functionality, because the functionality is there even though it's poorly documented and a pain to set up.

    14. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because your complaint falls under the "HELP MY INSTALL IS MAGICALLY BROKEN" category that people get tired of hearing complaints from. It's not anyone at Mozilla.org's fault your installation is broken. What do you want them to do, fix your computer for you? While the rest of us don't have the problems you mention?

    15. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by jvital · · Score: 1

      What a TROLL. Insightfull??! Let's see.

      No, it doesn't "exemplify why Linux struggles" anything. It exemplifies why Tcl/Tk has bad fonts, which is not the same as "Linux sucks". Tcl is one thing, Linux is a whole another thing. Tcl/tk is very very distant from representing "Linux" in that area, as a matter of fact.

      Then you compare Firefox with Amsn... pfff, comparing apples and stones. Three words: completely different toolkits.

      Websites look just fine here, the problem is in your website, trust me. Look around more and you'll find the problem.

    16. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by labratuk · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'm going to start posting screenshots of dodgy windows shareware written by russian 15 year olds and talk about how much windows sucks because of it.

      --
      Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    17. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      I can achieve anti-aliased fonts on linux without any effort.

    18. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      I can honestly say I have never experienced any difference between the behavior of fonts of css formatting on firefox in windows, OS X, linux or FreeBSD. I think your linux install is fucked.

    19. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by onlyjoking · · Score: 1

      Well it came more or less right out of the box from Fedora so that doesn't say much for desktop Linux, does it?

    20. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by onlyjoking · · Score: 1

      I have a more-or-less default installation of Fedora 4 running on a high quality 19" Formac display set to its optimal resolution so there must be quite a few others out there with the same problem.

    21. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by Splintax · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's Mozilla.com now. :-\
      http://www.mozilla.com/about

    22. Re:Typicall awful font rendering on Linux by psymastr · · Score: 1

      I agree with your comments on font rendering on Linux. I use ubuntu and its fonts are ok for english, but to read/write in my language (Greek) I had to install msttcorefonts (yes, ms fonts) because otherwise it would look like shit, especially on the web it would be blurry and bold.

      --
      Improve at backgammon rapidly through addictive quickfire position quizzes: www.bgtrain.com
  25. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by LocoMan · · Score: 1

    Agree. I live in Venezuela, and while I don't use much IM, I don't think I have any link on my contact list that's from latin america and that uses anything other than MSN (I did use to get the odd random ICQ message/spam, but it's been years since I've gotten one of those). My mother (she is a heavy IMer) has installed yahoo messenger and MSN, but all of her friends (latinamerica and spain) use MSN only. The only reason she installed yahoo was one time trillian (what I use) was having problems connecting to MSN and she installed it as an alternative when she wanted to contact me.

  26. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Bootvis · · Score: 1

    In most parts of Europe MSN dominates all other clients. Germany seems to be the exception. There ICQ and AIm are used a lot more. I don't have any numbers to back it up just experience :(

    --
    Read, refresh, repeat.
  27. In canada... by logik3x · · Score: 1

    In canada every1 uses MSN... I used to use ICQ long time ago but then everyone who statrted using internet were using MSN... I had to switch from icq to msn has I only had h4x0rs on my ICQ... too bad MSN is such a memory hog.. aMSN is good to fix this issue but still ain't the same has MSN.. looking forward to try thi release though

  28. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by techefnet · · Score: 0

    This is true.
    In Norway where I live, MSN seems like the only IM ever used. I tried to stay with ICQ back a few years ago, but since I discovered no one was using ICQ I forgot it and went on with MSN.
    IRC is also very popular in Norway, there's a nice norwegian community. It's not IM per se, but it's superiour than IM. I love IRC, I don't understand why people would use IM instead of IRC. :>

  29. Mercury is better. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The newest release also features full-speed webcam support.

  30. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Refrozen · · Score: 1

    Western Canada: MSN, Yahoo, AIM, ICQ (I've actually never met someone in real life with an ICQ number)

    AIM and Yahoo are somewhat interchangable depending on who you're talking to, due to our close-ness to the states. :)

  31. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by gmf · · Score: 1

    In fact the situation here in Germany seems to be different from most of the rest of the world. I use ICQ almost exclusively. The only reason I also have an AIM account was for some contacts from the US.

    ICQ even started cooperating with a major TV station, and running some TV ads recently. So it's anything but dead, at least in Germany. And by the way, feature-wise ICQ still seems to be superior to most of the other instant messengers.

  32. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 4, Funny

    The A in AIM stands for America.

    Well, technically I believe it stands for "AOL".

  33. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by anhdres · · Score: 1

    i agree. most young users are exclusively MSN. some older users (as myself) had ICQ accounts, which were the most popular until almost 4 years ago. i use trillian, of my local contacts, 90% are MSN, with three ICQ, 1 Yahoo. of my international contacts, the list is much more different, with several AIM and ICQ from europe and other parts of the world, and even some Yahoos! only my geekiest fellows use gtalk or other jabber, like i do.

  34. AMD64 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where's the amd64 .deb !?!?!

  35. i dont understand... by Synth3t1c · · Score: 1, Insightful

    why would someone go open source if theres a closed source free version that works fine already out there?

    i mean, im in favor for creating open source programs but why even bother - aMSN is adding functionality already given for free from MSN themselves...

    1. Re:i dont understand... by oglueck · · Score: 2, Informative

      The MS product
      - is only available for Windows
      - displays ads
      - has a bad user interface (you can't even rename contacts)

    2. Re:i dont understand... by tftp · · Score: 1
      1. You want to know what the software is doing
      2. You want to change the code
      3. You don't want to see ads (if there are ads in the original code)
      4. You don't run the officially blessed OS
      5. etc.
    3. Re:i dont understand... by Hydroksyde · · Score: 1

      I don't know why the released a windows version, but I think the main reason is support in other operating systems. Some people wont use closed source software for political reasons, but then they wouldn't be using windows, would they? Of course, one windows to linux migration technique is to switch users to the windows versions of linux applications, then switch them to linux when the understand those.

    4. Re:i dont understand... by sp0rk173 · · Score: 2, Informative

      aMSN works on linux. MSN messenger does not.

  36. Here's the working download Windows link by FinchWorld · · Score: 1
    --
    "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
  37. Mac OSX and Web Cam by einis · · Score: 1

    This amsn release seems to be the first non-iChat client supporting webcam under Mac OS X. Hip hip hurray. If it only had as polished interface as Adium, it would be definately first in a row. Someone behind amsn is way much faster in development than Microsoft itself, with only 5th Messenger version for Mac.

    1. Re:Mac OSX and Web Cam by Blapto · · Score: 1

      What about mercury messenger?

  38. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by master811 · · Score: 1

    Well being in the UK, everyone I know uses msnim, and why not, one of the biggest advantages of it is being able to use ANY email address by just setting it up with a msn passport, which a lot of people i know including myself have done. I had an AIM account a few years back, just as a few friends used it but they have now gone to msn as well, and i don't know anyone that uses ICQ, or yahoo for that matter (or at least that few that do have it set as a passport anyway.)

  39. excuse my ignorance, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...how do you get an MSN chat account in the first place if you don't have a windows machine? I tried to get one with my linux box and it wouldn't let me even register. I'm sure it's something obvious I am missing, but would appreciate the trick for this one, if there is a trick to it. Thanks in advance!

    1. Re:excuse my ignorance, but... by grolschie · · Score: 1

      You need a .NET Passport or a Hotmail account. You do NOT need MS Windows, just a browser and internet connection.

    2. Re:excuse my ignorance, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! hotmail account, check! I'll try it.

    3. Re:excuse my ignorance, but... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Use your email address and sign up at http://passport.net/

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  40. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by b0rk+b0rk+b0rk · · Score: 1

    Quebec also (Eastern Canada) - everybody I know, without exception, uses MSN. This may be a teenage (high school/college thing, however - my parents do use Yahoo!

  41. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    México:
    MSN, MSN, MSN, yahoo
    Sorry, AIM or ICQ don't exist more.

  42. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Library+Spoff · · Score: 1

    Here in Glasgow most of the kids use Yahoo. Mostly it was so they could set up local rooms eg "young fleeto room", but AFAIK yahoo stopped this facility. The Yahoo chatroom logs were used in a couple of murder & attempted murder trials. kids bragging etc...

    --
    Acid House saves Souls
  43. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Cee · · Score: 1

    Sweden: MSN, MSN, MSN, ICQ, Skype (you can use it for IM too)
    Nobody here knows what AIM is, and I haven't seen anyone using Yahoo either.

  44. FINALLY! by christoofar · · Score: 1

    A Linux client that has decent support for webcams (Video Over Linux) support!

    I ran modprobe for my webcam kernel module, downloaded the tarball, ran the Tcl script, and it picked up the fact I had VOL and the driver woke up in a second.

    Well done!

  45. Tcl/Tk by zhenga · · Score: 1

    I used to use aMSN on Mac OS X until I got tired of the resource hog/slowness of it.
    Now I use Adium, which is pretty fast and doesnt hog all my precious resources.

    This is probably because aMSN is written in Tcl/Tk though and Adium is written in the native Cocoa language and has Gaim as its core which is written in C.
    Still I hope one day Adium gets most of the advanced features that aMSN has now, like webcam support.

  46. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Crayon+Kid · · Score: 1

    I wish people would stop making up statistics about IM usage based on their own country or aquintances. Stuff like this "people all over the world" means nothing. There are regions where they use YM almost exclusively, or Gadu-gadu or other stuff.

    --
    i ate crayons when i was a kid and now i have two braincells and the blue ones taste nicer
  47. Ignorant slut teens rejoice! by tod_miller · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can now webcam chat with overweight IT geeks who can help you fix your probelms in return for flashing your belly button!

    The word is a better place.

    --
    #hostfile 0.0.0.0 primidi.com 0.0.0.0 www.primidi.com 0.0.0.0 radio.weblogs.com
    1. Re:Ignorant slut teens rejoice! by corvax · · Score: 1

      lol you got that right... I dont get the use of msn why support microsoft? you are supporting the use/spread of their protocol / client if you refused to use it and everyone you know did then if someone wanted to get ahold of you theyd have to use a different client aol yahoo JABBER icq whatever JUST STOP USING IT .If your goal is to support m$ then keep using it...

  48. The MSN client I want is..... by robgamble · · Score: 1

    ...a console-based Win32 app. I found plenty of them for Linux and OS/X but I can't locate any character-based MSN clients for Win32. I'm pretty sure they exist! I googled and I googled, and I googled some more: came up zeros. Anyone else know of one?

    --
    No sig for you!
    1. Re:The MSN client I want is..... by Steinfiend · · Score: 1

      How about CenterICQ? I know it sounds like is should be an ICQ client, but it can handle all major protocols, and a few minor ones. I've never tried the Windows port, but the Linux version is great. As usual YMMV, not affliated etc...

      http://thekonst.net/centericq/

    2. Re:The MSN client I want is..... by predakanga · · Score: 1

      You could always use amsn-remote, if you don't mind still having amsn actually running, even if invisible. Using the bitlbee service in a console IRC client (I think there are win32 builds of irssi out there) - it's been a lifesaver for me.

    3. Re:The MSN client I want is..... by matts-reign · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you were to use cygwin, you could use the best (tm) console client for msn -- tmsnc. Google it.

      --
      Waffles rock.
    4. Re:The MSN client I want is..... by ViceVirtue · · Score: 0

      http://konst.org.ua/centericq/
      CenterICQ has a Win32 binary available, my good chum :D I hope you enjoy it.
      It's a good client, does ICQ, Yahoo!, AIM, IRC, MSN, Gadu-Gadu(woo! yeah!) and Jabber.
      TMSNC may also be available for Win32.... nope, but it doesnt matter, it's always been unstable for me anyway.

  49. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by elynnia · · Score: 1

    I live in Australia, and with few exceptions, MSN is by far the de facto instant messenger: some people haven't even heard of the others. There's a small minority on Yahoo, and just one of my friends uses AIM - because she has so many friends in the States. I think, partly, this relates to the lack of aggressive marketing on AIM's part in Australia...

  50. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

    Mexico: seems to be mainly MSN (my impression), Netherlands: might be the same.

  51. It works on Linux! by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    Motivation for this? This works under Linux. Written in TCL. If I have to use MSN to talk to someone I don't have to reboot into my Winders partition.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
    1. Re:It works on Linux! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't you use kopete (or gaim if you aren't a KDE user) to do that?

  52. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, here's my knowledge - countries I've had several contacts in, who without exception supplied me with ID from one particular brand of IM to contact them with:

    UK: MSN
    France: MSN
    Germany: MSN
    Spain: MSN
    Mexico: MSN
    Colombia: MSN
    Brazil: MSN

    Since my portuguese is only about a year and a half old, I don't know this: Do you guys use "o msn" as a noun for anything msn-messenger-related like in Spanish (dame tu msn, entra al msn, tienes msn? etc.)?

    PS: I like my list. For some reason I've never needed to talk to an American over an IM network. One time I set up an AIM account, for some site, but that's about all. It has also just occured to me that I can answer my own question from before using google. Hurray!

  53. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The primary reason why I don't use the official MSN program on Windows (opting for GAIM) is because of the nudge feature. Why are all the open-source alternatives including it? It's possibly the single most annoying, useless feature of any messenger ever.

  54. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by xiaomai · · Score: 1

    not true. yahoo! definitely has control of Taiwan. Everyone there uses it... no one uses AIM, MSN is also fairly prominent, but not nearly as much as YIM.

  55. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Norway is pretty much MSN territory..

  56. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by flibble-san · · Score: 1

    The most popular IM in China is QQ, sort of based on ICQ but incompatible. After QQ a lot of people use MSN, followed by Yahoo.

    --
    My other sig is crap too
  57. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by soliptic · · Score: 1
    Well, I don't know about that.

    I'm in Britain; I don't have MSN; I do have AIM; loads of my friends have AIM and only a couple have MSN.

    Obviously my anecdotal evidence is no stronger than yours, but, I'm just saying...

    To be honest it's not always geographically based either. The reason I have AIM (and most of my friends have AIM) is because it seems the standard within the drum'n'bass community: if you want to send tracks to label bosses and DJs, you need AIM, simple as. Whereas none of them have MSN really.

    On the other hand, in psytrance, MSN seems more popular.

  58. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

    No one claimed these to be definitive statistics, they were just remarking on their experience of a trend. For what it's worth, my experiences of the UK and US are the same.

  59. Still stands for america by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "a" in aol stands for america :)

    1. Re:Still stands for america by Zantetsuken · · Score: 1

      you both have no clue, AIM stands for AOL Instant Messenger, and AOL stands for America On Line

      BTW, AOL and anything made by AOL is bound to suck, including AOL's Moviephone.com service (movie listings), and their Netscape browser, which they aquired in about '99 or so, sat on it, then realized that the AOL name was hurting them because it sucked so bad, so they switched it to Netscape, which as I said, is still AOL

  60. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Sithgunner · · Score: 1

    So far, as in school and in office, in Japan, I only saw people use MSN.
    I used ICQ when talking to people in the USA some years back, but lately, I only use MSN for any domestic im. I guess some use Yahoo, but I never even saw a person use AIM here.

  61. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by foxhound01 · · Score: 0

    That must be why so many people send me buddy requests on MSN in either Spanish or Portugese.

    --


    Linux is to the internet as Duct Tape is to the Universe.
  62. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Orgazmus · · Score: 1

    after mIRC came, irc went to hell.
    with im, you at least get to filter the tards a bit better.
    nothing like the feeling of some fresh irc to piss me off.
    still addicted to it tho ;)

    --
    The system had the verbosity of HTML combined with all the readability of compiled assembly viewed as bitmap images
  63. If aMSN doesn't do it for you... by cybernezumi · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...try Mercury Messenger for MSN+webcam support on Windows, Linux & MacOSX. Its done multi-platform webcam for awhile. It also supports receiving video conferences on Mac & two way video conferencing on Win/Linux. It also has a ton of other features.

    1. Re:If aMSN doesn't do it for you... by texroot · · Score: 1

      Mercury seemed nice when I tried it, but I couldn't get notification via sound or a visual cue when it was backgrounded and I received a new message.

      Maybe I didn't set something up right. I didn't work that hard at trying to find an answer.

    2. Re:If aMSN doesn't do it for you... by chemturion · · Score: 1

      While mercury for mac allows you to send and receve webcam feeds, it does a bad job with conferencing .Video-conferencing technically is supported on Mac OS X, but it is receive-only, caused by an incomplete JMF file for Mac OS X

      http://www.mercury.to/index.php?page=Mac

  64. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by nurhussein · · Score: 1

    In Malaysia normal folks use Yahoo Messenger (mostly) or YM with MSN, and the crazy Microsoft wingnuts who daydream about fellating Bill Gates use MSN exclusively.

  65. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    The area I live in (Western Kentucky), almost everyone uses MSN. They just love the nudges, "winks" (100x100 flash animated movies that pop up over everything, and dance around, etc. Why they are called winks, I will never know), and all the other bs that comes along with it. Almost nobody uses AIM or YIM.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  66. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by jrock-jr · · Score: 1

    As in North or South America?

  67. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China here (Beijing). A few years ago the market was dominated by a Chinese program called QQ, but these days MSN has a bigger share. QQ still advertise heavily, but they're fighting a losing battle.

  68. If Microsoft knew what was best for them.. by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

    ..they would learn to embrace this project, and other open source projects. As it stands, this MSN messenger clone is better than the official Mac MSN client as far as feature implementation goes. Since it is written in TCL/TK, it doesn't run very well in terms of speed (I'm on a Mac Mini 1.42 Ghz/512 MB Ram). The official MSN client runs a lot faster than this clone. Of course, if they contributed to this project to expand it's user-base, but it would ultimately mean for them that someone will make a parallel version of the client that stripped out all of Microsoft's advertisements and propaganda.

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
    1. Re:If Microsoft knew what was best for them.. by Aurix · · Score: 1

      Microsoft knows what is best for them. The ads make them money. If there was a Microsoft-supported, ad-free, open source client, do you think they'd still want to run the MSN IM service?

  69. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

    Australia (NSW, anyway) appears to be predominantly MSN. There are still a few AIM users left over from the ICQ days, but you don't see many of them.

  70. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 1

    Yep. ICQ was a hit way back in day, until people discovered that the MSN client didn't suck quite as much as the bloated ICQ monstrosity, and suddenly everyone seemed to switch. Note, this was the bare-bones cut-down version before the tabs and avatars/icons were available.

  71. Showstopper bug? by fernique · · Score: 1

    There was showstopper bug in aMSN (and Tkabber) when using Tcl/Tk compiled with --enable-threads option under linux kernels 2.5+. I believe it is not Debian-specific issue. Is it fixed already?

    --
    igor
  72. Really Slow by Tokagima · · Score: 1

    i am a mac user thanks to my parents not being willing to fork out money to buy me a decent computer (i got the mac from an uncle who didnt need it because they were upgrading to powerpc G5's) so when i found aMSN it was a god send however i have been having some problems. 0.95 is horribly laggy and often crashes where as 0.94 ran great. any suggestions as to how i could get 0.95 to run faster or should i just switch back to 0.94?

    --
    *peace,love and all that jazz* -Gary
    1. Re:Really Slow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      get a job, nuff said

    2. Re:Really Slow by Tokagima · · Score: 1

      lol, i have two and im working up some cash for a nice laptop. i appreciate the input :P

      --
      *peace,love and all that jazz* -Gary
    3. Re:Really Slow by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      Cool. So then, someone gave you tickets to this lame concert?

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
    4. Re:Really Slow by Tokagima · · Score: 1

      no man its like $5 and you get to see a bunch of awesome local bands. Hellbound was awesome and Blacklist definately got the crowd pumped. its just a bunch of guys renting the local hall and putting on a good show for everyone to enjoy. lots of fun

      --
      *peace,love and all that jazz* -Gary
  73. Good Mirrors (from amsn website) by chemturion · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems mirrors and SF download pages are slow or down... try downloading from :

    http://agoodm.plus.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=7

    - or-

    http://amsn.amnestysalinas.org/

    Torrent links are available at :

    http://amsn.recordingground.com/viewtopic.php?t=10 3

    1. Re:Good Mirrors (from amsn website) by chemturion · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the double post, but someome asked for Linux torrents and I forgot to mention that the links above have all torrents and binaries for all distro's and os's.

  74. Worthless anecdotal evidence ahead: by Vicsun · · Score: 1

    I live in Denmark, have ~100 contacts on my contact list and most of them are active. About half of them live in Denmark, a quarter in other parts of Europe and a quarter in other parts of the world. In that last quarter I have 2-3 Americans (country, not continent). They are the only one using AIM. Everyone else use MSN exclusively.

  75. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by gaspyy · · Score: 1

    Very interesting.
    Here in Romania, everyone is using YIM, whereas I can confirm that everyone I now from U is on MSN...

    I use Trillian :-)

  76. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

    what's wrong with IRC? still works fine for me. being the network admin helps though ;-)

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  77. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AIM (and ICQ) were destroyed by MSN pretty much everywhere outside the US because they didn't have a localized version of their clients back then, and using a software of that kind where you can't understand most of the interface isn't fun. Most of my friends couldn't use AIM/ICQ for this very reason, and then MSN came along with ease of use - and localization - and got nearly 100% of the userbase.

    Which is a good thing, because (at least the official) client is so much better.

  78. download.php blocked by blackest_k · · Score: 1

    for those who didn't read the article.
    It appears MSN servers will block some words the example given is "download.php"
    I tested this and it appears to be true.
    sending download.php to a friend on MSN resulted in a message saying this message was not delivered.

    now this means that each and every line of text sent over MSN is parsed for content.

    it also means the msn server has a function built in to carry out a different action depending on what the parser found.

    The implications are that there are other phrases which could be used to maybe target specific advertisements at an individual user or perhaps create an alert that someone should take a look at an individuals msn chatting history.

    As a nonamerican I don't have any rights as far as this goes. in fact I probably agreed to have my conversations recorded in the EULA.

    Is there anyway to avoid this happening I guess that the answer is no. but it might not be too hard to make it a lot more expensive to routinely monitor everything we say.

  79. Kopete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Still no reason to use this over KDE 3.5's Kopete.

  80. Re:download.php blocked by acoster · · Score: 1

    When I've first seen the article about download.php, I kept wondering why microsoft would select such string, instead of, for instance, sourceforge or freshmeat. Seems like they block download.php as a very idiot way to avoid people from spreading the MSN Plus download link.

    --
    "Go forth, and be excellent to each other" --Bill & Ted
  81. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by techefnet · · Score: 0

    But that is because it's a difference between IRC and IM. IRC is more like a community. I don't mind the "tards", I can avoid them if I want to :)

  82. Not a bad release by obeythefist · · Score: 1

    As far as version release articles go on /., this is not a horrible one.

    But, since it wasn't explicitly mentioned, aMSN is an open source MSN Messenger IM clone.
    And, like many other /. product releases, I never saw it before today and I had no idea what it was for without researching it.

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    1. Re:Not a bad release by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

      You need to get out more. My first encounter with aMSN was actually with the Windows version (3 or 4 years ago). I've since used the Linux version as well (although that was some time ago).

      I generally prefer Gaim or Kopete, but I may take another look at aMSN now.

      --
      Scott

      ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved
    2. Re:Not a bad release by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      I think the opposite may be true, I need to stay inside more on the computer researching MSN messenger clones.

      I'll stick with Trillian for now, anyway.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  83. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In jamaica MOST ppl use MSN probably because we are a former british colony :)

  84. Re:Gaim? MS-messenger? by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

    Since my portuguese is only about a year and a half old, I don't know this: Do you guys use "o msn" as a noun for anything msn-messenger-related like in Spanish (dame tu msn, entra al msn, tienes msn? etc.)?

    Yes. I've never seen the name MSN being used in Brazil in any non-MSN-Messenger-related context.

  85. Eastern Canada by QBasicer · · Score: 1

    I live in Nova Scotia, and everybody I know uses MSN. One person I know from the states uses all of them on Trill, I know nobody on Skype or Google. Only a few years ago, just about everybody was using ICQ. I havn't really used ICQ in years and I still know my number...

    --
    x86, oh yes, I'm pro.
  86. Just rename it to... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1

    ...Damned Alvaro's MesSeNger and see if the judge has a sense of humour.

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  87. Re:download.php blocked by angrykeyboarder · · Score: 1

    What else is new? AIM has been doing this for years.

    --
    Scott

    ©20014 angrykeyboarder & Elmer Fudd. All Wights Wesewved