Slashdot Mirror


AOL Names Top Spam Subjects For 2005

JamesAlfaro writes "Donald Trump and "penis patch" were the most popular subject lines used by spammers this year, as the fraudsters grew more sophisticated in trying to trick consumers, America Online said Wednesday in its third annual Top 10 Spam List. Six out of the 10 top subject lines this year fell into what experts call "special-order spam," which pretend to be from a friend, or part of a legitimate, customer-driven transaction."

205 comments

  1. Donald Trump and "penis patch" by Garg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like the title of a children's book from Hell.

    --
    Garg
    Alumnus, Xavier's School for Gifted Youngsters
    1. Re:Donald Trump and "penis patch" by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Funny

      I just thought it sounded redundant.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:Donald Trump and "penis patch" by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      You think that being around Donald Trump will make your penis larger?

  2. Sadly... by parasonic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The topics/products that they are using must be effective because they keep the spammers in business. It's horrible, but since these spammers are in business, a LOT of people must be falling for them.

    1. Re:Sadly... by Jeng · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, it means that the spammers are being employed by businesses that are falling for them.

      Doesn't necassarily mean that it is bringing in more business to those who employ spammers.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    2. Re:Sadly... by jtorkbob · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is true in many cases. But I'm surprised how often I hear of people buying things from spammers.

      It's not that expensive or difficult to send a spam out to, say, two million addresses. Even if 95% are blocked, and only .1% of those who recieve it buy something, that's still 100 sales. Not bad if you're selling a $50 knock-off watch.

      --
      AC: Only on slashdot... could the sentence "My hovercraft is full of eels." be moderated "+4, Insightful
    3. Re:Sadly... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      no, people who spam make lots and lots of money for themselves and there clients.
      It's pretty easy to trace which customer is responding to spam.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Sadly... by qzulla · · Score: 1
      no, people who spam make lots and lots of money for themselves and there clients. It's pretty easy to trace which customer is responding to spam.

      --

      free Mac mini [freeminimacs.com] Now thats

      I'm not sure how to respond to this. Probably best I don't except...

      pot, kettle, black

      qz

    5. Re:Sadly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't necassarily mean that it is bringing in more business to those who employ spammers.

      Then WhyTF do the companies buy the spammer's service?

  3. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we all need an article to tell us the Top "Top $insert_tagline_here of 2005"... So many to choose from.

    -- D

  4. Maybe the two are linked? by the-dark-kangaroo · · Score: 1

    Does "Donald Trump" and "Penis Patch" have something strangely in common?

    --
    If Carling made signatures they would be the best signatures in the world...
    1. Re:Maybe the two are linked? by Crilen007 · · Score: 1

      Maybe Donald has a Penis Patch? Maybe hes funding it? He should fire his apprentice.

    2. Re:Maybe the two are linked? by ShibaInu · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think "firing his apprentice" is Donald's term for working his penis patch.

    3. Re:Maybe the two are linked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know they have something in common for me. Ever since I started using a Penis Patch, mine has gotten so big that a few months ago I started calling it "The Donald."

    4. Re:Maybe the two are linked? by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Is the fact that the first ad which appears at the base of the article is "Buy latest anti-virus software. Protect your PC with Symantec" part of some grand scheme? I thought that was the beginning of the list.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    5. Re:Maybe the two are linked? by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 1

      I think he probably just calls it "Playing with my other bald head."

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  5. Spam is interesting by tbarker · · Score: 1

    When I first got an internet account my spam was all p0rn and stock tips. Now it's cheap drugs and mortage loans...

    Sort of a collective gutter sub-consciouness I suppose :-)

    --
    "I like people. They're like little Happy Meals with legs" - Spike
    1. Re:Spam is interesting by Dominic+Burns · · Score: 1

      "Sort of a collective gutter sub-consciouness I suppose :-)"

      Or desperate people trying to climb out of the constantly degrading financial 'gravity well'?

      :-(

    2. Re:Spam is interesting by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I started reading my spam recently to see what kind of things I was getting. A significant proportion of it seems to be selling glass dildos. I can't help think that such a device is a sure way to get on the list of the top ten most embarrassing reasons for being admitted to hospital...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Spam is interesting by jbrader · · Score: 4, Funny

      Thay're actually pretty heavy duty (I'm not going to discuss how I know). You'd have to be engaged in some pretty vigorous activity to damage one.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    4. Re:Spam is interesting by murayava · · Score: 1

      Yes, p0rnos. Don't you wish things were back the way they were in the old days? And heck, even stock tips might have a use someday...

      --
      THE (beat that!)
    5. Re:Spam is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know how you know this. You're one of them spammers aren't you? he he.

    6. Re:Spam is interesting by Burning1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Parent is absolutly right. These toys are often quite large and sturdy. Having some knowledge of them I can say with confidence: here in the USA, glass dildo breaks YOU.

  6. AOL could really help out.... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... you know, something really simple that would help the war on spam.

    1) Clean up your 20 year old database of it's unused usernames
    2)Blacklist any server/ip/whatever that sends email to x amount of disabled accounts (I would say x ==5 but any value really would work)
    3) Publish said blacklist

    There is no way a spammer could avoid an AOL address. Start doing this with hotmail, yahoo mail, netscape mail, whatever mail, and I think we would be able to lock off the "bad" senders a lot faster than projects such as spews.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:AOL could really help out.... by grasshoppa · · Score: 1, Insightful

      2)Blacklist any server/ip/whatever that sends email to x amount of disabled accounts (I would say x ==5 but any value really would work)
      3) Publish said blacklist


      Gee, what a great idea

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    2. Re:AOL could really help out.... by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There is a better idea: do this locally.

      Set up two accounts on your mail server (example.org): aaron@example.org and zeke@example.org -- any two names that sound legitimate and sort very early/very late. Then, make sure these two names are well-published; you may put them on your webpage, include them in .sig, whatever.

      When anything hits one of these mailboxes, just block the relevant traffic -- autolearn the piece of spam, _temp_ block the IP and/or bump its score.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:AOL could really help out.... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks. Not only do you apparently not understand the full nature of spamhaus, you never even read my full comment, else you wouldnt have made yours.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    4. Re:AOL could really help out.... by fishybell · · Score: 0
      That's essentially one of the 10 or so ways that I filter spam at my company. Want the list of blacklisted spam servers? Here ya go (or at least the last 500 of 11000+):
      • 69.251.4.133 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 00:57:17 MST 12005
      • 202.140.36.53 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 02:44:37 MST 12005
      • 60.49.57.77 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 04:08:35 MST 12005
      • 202.175.190.35 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 04:45:05 MST 12005
      • 69.207.109.25 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 05:11:19 MST 12005
      • 82.228.10.168 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 05:21:54 MST 12005
      • 71.194.172.94 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 05:36:16 MST 12005
      • 71.192.144.96 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 06:35:08 MST 12005
      • 71.198.224.94 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 06:54:46 MST 12005
      • 84.227.195.5 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 07:04:47 MST 12005
      • 66.98.89.58 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 07:09:13 MST 12005
      • 209.128.122.4 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 08:36:17 MST 12005
      • 221.128.77.96 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 08:47:11 MST 12005
      • 66.176.177.123 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 09:25:55 MST 12005
      • 69.15.194.66 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 10:24:53 MST 12005
      • 10.10.223.148 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 10:24:53 MST 12005
      • 71.56.252.236 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 10:38:17 MST 12005
      • 216.91.137.142 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 10:38:17 MST 12005
      • 85.164.12.85 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 10:40:12 MST 12005
      • 66.24.76.120 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 11:03:20 MST 12005
      • 200.121.78.122 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 11:11:41 MST 12005
      • 67.189.134.138 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 11:48:49 MST 12005
      • 24.175.121.141 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 11:51:43 MST 12005
      • 216.163.188.54 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 11:51:43 MST 12005
      • 86.62.199.181 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 12:02:42 MST 12005
      • 85.228.96.231 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 12:11:17 MST 12005
      • 24.164.119.71 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 12:11:23 MST 12005
      • 85.225.90.116 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 12:13:34 MST 12005
      • 24.19.255.79 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 13:05:20 MST 12005
      • 83.171.156.120 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 13:52:02 MST 12005
      • 66.63.208.195 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 14:01:45 MST 12005
      • 130.212.178.158 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 14:59:52 MST 12005
      • 71.14.19.44 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 17:04:56 MST 12005
      • 87.74.70.29 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 17:06:51 MST 12005
      • 65.190.135.168 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 17:45:33 MST 12005
      • 68.60.66.189 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 18:07:58 MST 12005
      • 66.65.41.231 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 19:04:49 MST 12005
      • 129.187.254.102 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 19:04:49 MST 12005
      • 24.10.202.61 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 19:14:03 MST 12005
      • 38.117.156.34 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 19:49:52 MST 12005
      • 66.75.158.41 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 20:58:11 MST 12005
      • 212.108.64.64 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 20:58:11 MST 12005
      • 12.25.244.120 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 20:58:41 MST 12005
      • 61.91.131.114 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 21:45:03 MST 12005
      • 24.210.100.147 REJECT # ST:Mon Dec 19 23:02:23 MST 1
      --
      ><));>
    5. Re:AOL could really help out.... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Adn essentially, I imagine a LOT of people do this locally. But AOL is in a unique position, that they are the largest target for spam, and have the EASIEST way of detecting it (by flagging excessive mail to unused accounts). Have that list for the general public to suck down and everyones spam from said places would drop dramatically. The response time could be multitudes faster and more effective than spews

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    6. Re:AOL could really help out.... by SlowSlow · · Score: 1

      That might not be a fair approach for good companies. Many companies have legitimate opt-in newsletters and other email announcements that go to their members. Most people don't go through and change all of their subscriptions when they change email addresses. Many companies would be marked as spam because their members changed addresses without notifying them.

      Of course, they should make sure that they aren't getting bounced emails already, though some ISPs such as AOL often don't tell you when you've sent many bad emails.

    7. Re:AOL could really help out.... by jtorkbob · · Score: 1

      Uh, WTH?

      That wasn't necessary. At all. Your attempt at honeypotting is slightly interesting but I can't think of a single reason to post that much info.

      --
      AC: Only on slashdot... could the sentence "My hovercraft is full of eels." be moderated "+4, Insightful
    8. Re:AOL could really help out.... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      I agree that this is a possible problem... but a companies opt-in list of aol members wont miraculously become void of actual people. They will drop off slowly, to where said org can appropriately groom their list (WHICH YOU JERKS SHOULD DO ANYWAY INSTEAD OF BEING LAZY)

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    9. Re:AOL could really help out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's unused usernames

      "its".

      sends email to x amount of

      "x number of".

      Also, you can use <ol> to make a numbered list, rather than doing it manually.

    10. Re:AOL could really help out.... by rabbit994 · · Score: 1

      And if your running a legit newsletter organization, you should auto scrub your list when mail server your sending to newsletter gives you "550 Mailbox no longer valid" (or whatever SMTP status and error message is)

    11. Re:AOL could really help out.... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Those are mostly residential cable/adsl systems.
      I find that I can cut most of them by excluding patterns like these for the reverse-resolved address:

      *.res.rr.com
      *.??.comcast.net

      I enable a filter with a long list of these whenever a new spam/virus storm breaks out. Could probably leave it enabled all the time as we (as a Dutch company) never get any valid mail from addresses like that, but you never know...

    12. Re:AOL could really help out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, good idea. I'll start here.

      Any questions, email me at

      alex@mikegoode.com
      tom@mikegoode.com

    13. Re:AOL could really help out.... by fishybell · · Score: 1

      and that's why you're on my hit list

      --
      ><));>
    14. Re:AOL could really help out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you wouldnt have

      "wouldn't".

    15. Re:AOL could really help out.... by Kelson · · Score: 2, Informative
      you should auto scrub your list when mail server your sending to newsletter gives you "550 Mailbox no longer valid"

      ...subject to some minimum amount of time to allow for temporary errors when the server crashes and the admin only gets it halfway back up, or someone breaks the config, or the domain name or hosting contract expires and mail gets routed to a parking server until it's renewed, etc.

    16. Re:AOL could really help out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a great idea! Now I just need to forge x emails from someone@mindchild.net to sdfjasjwtetj@aol.com, and you'll never get any e-mail again!

      If only e-mail were traceable... (And the Received: header weren't forgable - you may be fairly sure of the LAST hop, but I can fake any ones before it!)

    17. Re:AOL could really help out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As someone who knows the mail system at AOL, I can attest that we block an average of over 2 BILLION mails a day as SPAM, and allow a trickle of 350 million or so per day to our members.

      This blocking occurs because we maintain blacklists, whitelists, use SPF and incredibly sophisticated processing to detect the SPAM before it can reach our members mailboxes. After that, the member themselves can teach their own personal SPAM filters what they think is SPAM.

      I could tell you how all this stuff works, but then I'd have to kill you. Part of it is NOT letting the bad guys know the contents of your white/black lists, or how you determine what is and is not SPAM.

      SPAM is no longer an issue to AOL members. Sure the occasional bit of crap gets through the gauntlet, but it is nothing like the old days. Most of the SPAM comes from hijacked accounts or zombie PCs. If someone could get Microsoft to clean up their act the level of SPAM would drop to practically nil.

    18. Re:AOL could really help out.... by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      Set up two accounts on your mail server (example.org): aaron@example.org and zeke@example.org

      Pity the bored IANA employee who one day decides that example.com is missing a mail server.

    19. Re:AOL could really help out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction to my post.

      The 350 million mails I referred to are those that our systems have let through as "not spam".

      My comment about Microsoft stands. I can't believe we almost got into bed with those people.

    20. Re:AOL could really help out.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only e-mail were traceable...

      I've had an idea to make it so for a long while.

      Well, it at least makes email Accountable.

      YOu want to set up an email server? You apply to your ISP (Let's say 'Joes ISP'). They check you out, and 'certify' you as being legitimate. You are given a public/private key pair. Your email server is set up to encrypt a header line with your private key. This header line consists of your certification, and who certified you, time stamp, etc.

      When the email reaches it's final destination (That is to say, the server it's destined for), the server at that end will use your public key to decrypt the header (fetching it from your dertifier's server if necessary). If it decrypts correctly, the email is confirmed as coming from your server.

      This provides accountability. Any such 'certified' email can be proven to come from a certain server.

      Using that info, the upstream providers can be held acountable for the people they certify. In the example above, if you start sending spam, then complaints get sent to Joe's ISP. They have a choice:

      1) Contact you quickly and get you to stop spamming
      2) Withdraw your certification.
      3) Get their certification (or even internet access altogether) cut off from their upstream. ...

      At the user level, nothing changes. You send an email like you always have. You receive emails like you always have. The only possible difference is that you might have your email program filter out the non-certified emails, or handle them differently from the certified ones.

  7. Cannot... Resist... by BigCheese · · Score: 1

    Now someone is going to be hawking the "Donald Trump Penis Patch" in my email.

    OK It's out of my system now.

    --
    The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer. - Edward R. Murrow
    1. Re:Cannot... Resist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now someone is going to be hawking the "Donald Trump Penis Patch" in my email.

      If you put it on, does it make you as big of a dick as The Donald? What does it do to your hair?

  8. Spelling by Tri0de · · Score: 4, Funny

    What I STILL cannot figure out is WHY some jerk off thinks I would refinance my mortgage with, or trust the health and safety of Mr. Happy to, someone who cannot even fucking *SPELL*!!

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
    1. Re:Spelling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he is hoping that you can't spell either? That might tell smething about people who answer to spam.

    2. Re:Spelling by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      It might also tell smething about people who answer to posts complaining about spelling mistakes in spam.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    3. Re:Spelling by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1

      Misspellings are frequently intentional, to bypass some spam filters.

      --
      Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
    4. Re:Spelling by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

      The average person cannot spell worth a damn (at least in my experience). If they don't know that it's spelled all wrong, why would they think it's any less legit?

    5. Re:Spelling by Lxy · · Score: 1

      I find it ironic that you post complaints about spelling to Slashdot. We can't spell, either!

      --

      There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
      :wq
    6. Re:Spelling by SmittyTheBold · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...said Tri0de.

      --
      ± 29 dB
    7. Re:Spelling by OrangeCowHide · · Score: 1
      I think there's a slight difference between a slashdot off the cuff remark with typos, grammar errors, and general brainfarts compared to the spam standard trying to sound like a genuine professional (you know, someone that could actually offer the services listed in the e-mail) and trying to beat the spam filters.

      Subj: You're Acccount #7787778SsBBhAAH

      Wee have a spe<irrelevant HTML tag>cial deal for u to get the m<irrelevant HTML tag>on3y u need 2day. We cn get u upto $1,000,00 in as litte a 10 minutes.

      tango lemon acoustic shoelace daughter Mars mug thoroughbred alleyway cabinet wildfire fragrance option

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains. - Evilest Doe
    8. Re:Spelling by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      hehehe brilliant. extra point if intentionally not closing the two s. I've received spam in my work inbox that claims to be from the FBI and CIA that ends with "cya"......it's a sick sad world out there.

    9. Re:Spelling by boingo82 · · Score: 1
      I love the ones from people who can't figure out their automailer scripts either.

      [[fulllname]] Could you use $10,000?
      [[fulllname]] we have $10,000 ready too send you.
      Click the link below, and it will be on you're doorstep in [[city]] within 24 hours. Dont let this opprotunity pass you buy!!

      --
      As a republican I feel it my responsibity to manufacture criminals. People need punished!
    10. Re:Spelling by Tri0de · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not the only one who can tell when something is spelled wrong, even if I don't know the correct waqy to spell it. I'm sure there's a term for it, but you gotta know what I mean - something just looks wrong.

      And I think there is a difference between a quickie post between friends or on a bbs as opposed to a formal solicitation for business. I usually don't spellcheck an off-the-cuff email to a bud, I damn well do so for a resume. I mean of course I know that they actually misspell stuff like 'penis' to get past spam filters.

      --
      "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
  9. Need s0ftware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the one that I've gotten at least once a day for the last couple of weeks.

    The list of IP ranges from which my server will not accept inbound SMTP traffic is already staggering, and yet I can't seem to get them all. It's ridiculous, and nearly every one is very obviously a pwned Windows box sitting on a consumer broadband connection.

    I'd like to find these morons running these machines, and remove their fingernails with a pair of pliers.

    1. Re:Need s0ftware? by jtorkbob · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ever head of the many great realtime blackhole lists?

      http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml
      http://dnsbl.njabl.org/
      http://ordb.org/

      No need to roll your own. There is even one designed to list dynamic IPs (http://www.dnsbl.nl.sorbs.net/).

      --
      AC: Only on slashdot... could the sentence "My hovercraft is full of eels." be moderated "+4, Insightful
    2. Re:Need s0ftware? by Medievalist · · Score: 4, Insightful


      You don't need to find the lusrs with pwned boxen. They, after all, are only doing what they've been told to do by us technical elitey types.

      You just need to realize that the broadband providers are capable of stopping this problem by themselves, with their existing equipment, and the only reason they don't do it is because it would impact their revenue stream (well, that and the high correlation of greed with stupidity).

      With Comcast's resources at my disposal, I could stop all spam and virus propagation from their networks in a month or less. But a certain number of customers (mostly spammers and other criminals) would stop paying their monthly bill as a result, and thus Comcast has a simple ROI equation: Screw you over, and get paid, do the Right Thing, and don't get paid.

      Easy decision for them, because WE are letting them get away with it. Write your congresscritter, make Comcast (and their ilk) liable for running worm farms.

    3. Re:Need s0ftware? by jtorkbob · · Score: 2

      You are proposing that we block connections to port 25?

      Or some more complicated magic?

      In either case, leave my ISP alone :P

      --
      AC: Only on slashdot... could the sentence "My hovercraft is full of eels." be moderated "+4, Insightful
    4. Re:Need s0ftware? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      The list of IP ranges from which my server will not accept inbound SMTP traffic is already staggering, and yet I can't seem to get them all. It's ridiculous

      Deciding what is spam or not based on where it comes from works in some specific cases (ie, the spam bots you talk about) if you could keep up with all such sources. The broader your list becomes the bigger the chance that you will end up blocking non spam mail as well however.

      Whitelisting has its obvious problems with regards to people trying to contact you whom you don't know about but with whom you'd want contact. One could use greylisting instead which sortof works (untill you run into one of the many lame smtp servers that don't know about temporary failures and won't resend.. Sadly enough there are quite a few of those out there also that are used for legitimate email)

      In the end, using blacklists and whitelists in an 'advisory way', ie, as an indication of possible spam in case of a blacklisted source, and likely not spam in case of a whitelisted source, combined with content based filtering, seems to work relatively well, and when used with a feedback system it can work really well, stopping virtually all spam with no or an extremely low number of false positives.

    5. Re:Need s0ftware? by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would it really be that much trouble to make one phonecall?

      Example: Comcast (or other huge ISP) blocks port 25 by default. To unblock your port 25, call the 1-800 number and make the request. The End.

      Yes it will add another hoop to jump through, and will undoubtedly complicate things for n00bs trying to setup whatever flavor of e-mail client they want/need to use, but the vast majority of subscribers aren't using this port.

      For companies like Comcast, this is just another added line to the papers they stuff into your self-install kit.

      just my 2 cents

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    6. Re:Need s0ftware? by jtorkbob · · Score: 1

      Hello, Comcast? My name is Joe Spammer, I'd like you to open my port 25. Thanks!

      Do you pay any attention to the hoops that many spammers are currently jumping through? Throwaway domains, DNS & reverse IP games, etc. Unless you're willing to close it totally, restricting port 25 will have little effect.

      --
      AC: Only on slashdot... could the sentence "My hovercraft is full of eels." be moderated "+4, Insightful
    7. Re:Need s0ftware? by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      What you're missing is that the phone calls wouldn't be made, because the people who own the machines aren't aware that they're actually sending spam courtesy of the last Trojan they installed.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    8. Re:Need s0ftware? by eneville · · Score: 1

      Whitelisting has its obvious problems with regards to people trying to contact you whom you don't know about but with whom you'd want contact. One could use greylisting instead which sortof works (untill you run into one of the many lame smtp servers that don't know about temporary failures and won't resend.. Sadly enough there are quite a few of those out there also that are used for legitimate email)

      greylisting works just fine here, using qgreylist, it greys a /24 network at a time, cleans up rather nicely. It's certainly blocking lots, and all my maillist mail gets through just fine. I don't know of anyone who's had trouble mailing me, I think the problems may lie with pariticular implementations of greylisting software, rather than the MTA which is delivering mail.

    9. Re:Need s0ftware? by shawb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What this will do is prevent zombie networks from sending out spam.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    10. Re:Need s0ftware? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      I think the problems may lie with pariticular implementations of greylisting software, rather than the MTA which is delivering mail.

      You are mistaken.

      The problem comes down to the delivering MTA treating a temporary failure as a permanent one, and never resending that mail. That is a broken MTA according to the RFCs and is the problem here. There is nothing whatsoever that a greylist implementation can do to prevent this (given we are not using entirely different definitions of greylists)

      Of course this is a non-issue if you don't want that mail anyway.

      At any rate, I've seen this issue a few times, and it is easily resolved but requires manual intervention. A better solution would of course be for the sender to install a proper MTA.

      If you want to nitpick then you can argue that this is not a problem with greylisting but with those MTAs, and right you are, but I want my mail to arrive and it stands in the way of that at times, whereas my current content and rbl based filters don't.

    11. Re:Need s0ftware? by fredklein · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because spammers would NEVER pretend to be other people....

    12. Re:Need s0ftware? by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Doesn't scale nearly as well as botnets do, and they'd also have to spoof Caller ID unless they'd like to make it incredibly obvious.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  10. Paypal pfishing by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am suprised that paypal pfishing didn't make the article. I get these every day.

    --
    Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

    http://financialpetition.org/
    1. Re:Paypal pfishing by greysky · · Score: 4, Funny

      I haven't seen any of these. But I have had to re-enter all my financial info into paypal about a hundred times this year.

    2. Re:Paypal pfishing by Flwyd · · Score: 1

      My mother in law likes to send cash in the mail (wrapped in tinfoil, no less). We were wondering out loud if we could get her to stop. She seems incapable of using a check, though she must have an account. I wondered aloud if we should explain PayPal to her, but then I wondered if she'd fall for those spams. Since PayPal spam is probably more frequent than people stealing USPS mail, we resigned ourselves to receiving cash (unrequested) for birthdays and holidays.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  11. Bad memory ? by ultranova · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the article:

    For example, this year's list features "your mortgage application is ready," another claims to have sent "you to the wrong site," and others simply say "thank you" or "re:," as if they are responding to the recipient.

    How can anyone possibly fall for these ? I have the worst memory of anyone I know (or remember ;), and I have no trouble remembering if I have any bending applications or e-mail conversations.

    Or are these things trying to make people think that they've accidentally gotten someone elses mail and might profit by playing along - are these messages trying to tempt people into trying to commit fraud in order to defraud them ? That would be ironic, and essentially the same tactic that Nigerian letters used - could the senders of Nigerian spam claim patent violation ?-)

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    1. Re:Bad memory ? by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      How can anyone possibly fall for these ?

      Believe it or not, the general populace is pretty dumb and high proportion of them use AOL.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    2. Re:Bad memory ? by clark625 · · Score: 1

      Spammers make money by a certain percentage of people that view their messages. With the advent of better spam-identfifaction, it's important for the spammers to rewrite their messages to get around those filters. Remember, a spammer can't make money if his/her message is caught by the spam filter and the end-user doesn't see it.

      So, what you think looks like a subject and even semi-normal text but seems weird, is really about getting past the spam filters and so that you can see it and make an "informed decision". Sure, you think it looks fishy and hit delete; but others still send out their credit card numbers. And 1 credit card number in 1 million messages is still cheap for the spammer.

      --
      Long, cute, or funny Sigs are just another form of over compensation, used by geeks, nerdz, etc.
    3. Re:Bad memory ? by merreborn · · Score: 1

      I have the worst memory of anyone I know (or remember ;), and I have no trouble remembering if I have any pending applications

      There's a goodly number of people out there who will see a subject like that and think: "IDENTITY THEFT! SOMEONE'S APPLYING FOR MORTGAGES WITH MY PERSONAL INFORMATION".

      I know this for a fact because a coworker's code, which was supposed to email everyone who'd purchased from us exactly 21 days ago, emailed everyone who'd purchased from us in the last 2 years. We've since received dozens of emails saying "I'VE NEVER ORDERED FROM YOU, CANCEL THE CHARGE OR I'LL CONTACT MY LAWYER" or "I DIDN'T ORDER FROM YOU SOMEONE MUST HAVE STOLEN MY IDENTITY!", when in reality no charge has been made, and they did purchase from us -- a year and a half ago.

      So: I can see how someone would OPEN the email, given that subject line, but I can't imagine why they would then PURCHASE any good or service from the spammer!

    4. Re:Bad memory ? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      and sadly, the average american idiot can easily see a 40k a year income, and easily see quadruple that in credit limit with about 15-25 credit card offers... 'a fool and his money are soon parted' has never been more true. heck even a 'intelligent' person can be suckered in with a plausible pitch you pay $15 to be 'included' in a special survey group, whhere you fill out market surveys and recieve $1-2 per survey filled out, the '$15' membership fee to filter out 'rif raff' so as to attract more 'marketers' seems like it could ve a viable and realistic marketing company, only it turns out that the first 'batch' are paid with the money they 'paid' to the company, and not given more than a few surveys and when they give 'good' feedback on said site, massive more suckers come in, and then the place rakes in enough cash closes shop, and no-one ever sees their $15 memberships except the 'first' thousand or so... and the next 20-50 thousand all their cash is just taken to parts unknown... 300k to 750k in 'easy' money :/ if you bother to mail out fake checks you can keep the operation running a month or two longer than if you simply stop offering 'surveys' and possibly fool enough people to get a quick million... basically any offer that asks for money up front is probably a scam, even if they're only asking $10-$15 sometimes they make the offers sound almost too plausable.. 'install our adbar, get paid to surf the web' meanwhile their adbar includes a keylogger and phishing toolkit to data mine you for access to bank accounts etc, so they can clean you out in one fell swoop...

      remember, Netzero started off offering 'free' dialup access with 'ad' banners... and they were perfectilly legitimate... so it's possible for some clever scam artists to come up with reasonable or realistic sounding 'scams' that act like a legit business for weeks or months before they 'become' a bogus scam that trys to clean out a lot of unsuspecting people for millions...

    5. Re:Bad memory ? by operagost · · Score: 1
      What was wrong with Netzero's business plan? It's essentially the same as broadcast TV's. I don't see the connection to these scams, which invariably DO ask for money up front.

      By the way, please capitalize the first letter of your sentences (?) and layoff the ellipses. A single period will do.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    6. Re:Bad memory ? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      the point is that someone could take the netzero buisness plan, and make a scam based company that instead of 'installing' just a simple ad banner installed a data mining tool so they could scam everyone at once out of loads of cash. the problem isn't with netzero, just the fact that a legitimitabe buisness started out with a 'too good to be true' model and wound up with way more customers than they could realistically provide service for for the ad revenues they had.. well.. it shows how easily some scammer could Start up a scam site that seemed on the face of things to be legitimate... and wound up wiping out peoples checking accounts etc...

      i never liked capitilization rules :p

    7. Re:Bad memory ? by Photon+Ghoul · · Score: 1

      are these messages trying to tempt people into trying to commit fraud in order to defraud them ?

      After having spam detail for a few months at our company when the former sysadmin left and getting to see more than my share of subject lines, I have to say "yes". The spammers prey on three types of people: the naive, the desperate and the degenerate.

    8. Re:Bad memory ? by Inda · · Score: 1

      I think you've hit the nail on the head because you can only con the greedy and the dishonest.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    9. Re:Bad memory ? by dangitman · · Score: 1
      and I have no trouble remembering if I have any bending applications

      Does that have something to do with blackjack and hookers?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  12. AOL by suso · · Score: 3, Funny

    At first I thought you meant AOL tops the list of spam subjects.

    Me too!

    1. Re:AOL by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1
      Me too!

      But it's:
      AOL Names Top Spam Subjects For 2005
      NOT
      AOL Named Top Spam Subject For 2005

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:AOL by suso · · Score: 1

      Actually, I didn't misread it, I just thought with all the corporate takeovers that what was meant was stuff like Google, Time Warner and Microsoft where showing up in the subjects.

      They all want a piece of the "AOL Names".

  13. FYI by broothal · · Score: 3, Informative
    Here's the list in readable form:

    • Donald Trump Wants You - Please Respond
    • Double Standards New Product - Penis Patch Body Wrap
    • Lose 6-20 inches in one hour
    • Get an Apple iPod Nano, PS3 or Xbox 360 for Free
    • It's Lisa, I must have sent you to the wrong site
    • Breaking Stock News** Small Cap Issue Poised to Triple
    • Thank you for your business. Shipment notification
    • Your Mortgage Application is Ready
    • Thank you Your $199 Rolex Special Included
    • Online Prescriptions Made Easy
    1. Re:FYI by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Even better, a "You Are Wrong Because" list, from one of the Dilbert books.

      http://www.megat.co.uk/wrong/

    2. Re:FYI by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Strange. Where's Doctor's "The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical" or Vanessa J. Smith's "Software"? I know I'm not the only one who gets those. And the repetition of the same subject in their respective e-mails should make them show up on the list somewhere. The Rolex and Xbox 360 spams tend to change their subject lines...

    3. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, I am getting a lot of "(insert place name here) Customer #(insert random "tracking" number here) Delivery confirmation" crap in an account I suspect they grabbed from yahoo groups a while back. The other common one is all these "X vs. Y" poll type junk.

      Hell, I get the same message style "from" McDonalds, Walmart, Levi's etc and it is amazing how long this spammer has kept it up. Most of the content is just directing you to some obviously unrelated site to "claim" your "free XYZ". While it makes it to my yahoo spam folder, I have 30 similar messages in there. And some of them are quite stupid, "Maxwell House Customer #idremovedfuckoffspammers" WTF??

      The crap claims to come from:
      ThirtyOne
      5114 Balcones Woods Dr Ste 307 PMB 443
      Austin, TX 78757
      USA

      If this crap is intended as a pish, they sure don't seem like it and fail in doing so. I am not giving their sites any clicks, and like hell I am going to give them any info so they can list wash.

    4. Re:FYI by Slashcrap · · Score: 2, Funny

      - Double Standards New Product - Penis Patch Body Wrap
      - Lose 6-20 inches in one hour

      Someone has to try using both of these products at the same time. Let them fight it out and see which one is most effective. We could place bets on whether it ends up longer or shorter.

    5. Re:FYI by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

      Doctor's "The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical"

      I get about 10 of those a day. Well. did before setting a filter...

      I also get the software one, but from many different names.

      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    6. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does the Penis Patch Body Wrap cause you to lose 6-20 inches in one hour?

    7. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Lose 6-20 inches in one hour

      what is this? some kind of antidote for the penis pills/patches/whatever?
    8. Re:FYI by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

      Lose 6-20 inches in one hour
      And others claim to gain 3 inches in 2 weeks.
      Either something very strange is going on or I'm confused.

    9. Re:FYI by kendbluze · · Score: 1

      ...or WHERE it ends up!

    10. Re:FYI by Splintax · · Score: 1

      Dude, what the fuck? I thought it was just me. Who is that bitch Vanessa J. Smith, and why is she trying to sell us software?

    11. Re:FYI by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 1

      She runs an OEM reseller. (I clicked the link once.) It's illegal, because presumably the OEM installation hasn't been deleted (so she's selling a "backup" copy), and because you can't transfer the license on OEM software anyway, even if you did uninstall it - it's in the license agreement and probably on the CD cover.

      It doesn't appear illegal, because according to the pre-IP concept of ownership, the company gave you two copies of the software (one preinstalled, one on the CD), and you can resell the extra one, right? And it's not "piracy" in the strict* sense of the word, since she's not making any copies, she's only selling an existing one.

      *Arrr, not that strict, landlubber.

    12. Re:FYI by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I already was wondering why they couldn't just mark it up as a list.

    13. Re:FYI by JaLooNz · · Score: 1

      I also got dozens of these...

      Medical Ones
      ============
      "The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical"
      "Tadalafil Soft Tabs - Great results!"
      "Remember the old days?"
      "Prescription Drugs"
      "Pharmacy - No doctor visits"
      "Get it up again"
      "Better than Viagra"
      and many more on these drugs...

      Rolex Ones
      ==========
      "Replica for you"
      "Get Your Own Replica"

      So far, I can conclude the drugs do sell better than the watches, considering the quantity of spam sent.

    14. Re:FYI by Rxke · · Score: 1

      Those are easily blocked, because they always use the same wordings. I guess most servers/filters block them before they, and so they don't show up at most people's inboxes... Then again, I get those in my Gmail account, (and those are in fact almost the only spammails I get, 3 or 4 a week...) which I think is strange, because if *I* can redirect those to my spambox by using a simple, dumb filter myself, I don't understand why GMail doesn't filter them theirselves...

  14. Please, please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone post a witty 'your plan will not work' check-box list. I could do with a giggle.

  15. Most Effective Subject Line by DiGG3r · · Score: 2, Funny

    Click here for Boobies!

    1. Re:Most Effective Subject Line by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Where's the link?

      I clicked, but there wasn't a link.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    2. Re:Most Effective Subject Line by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      you poor, sad soul.

      Now go back to google and just search for pr0n like a normal person.

    3. Re:Most Effective Subject Line by John+Bokma · · Score: 1

      I clicked 10 times, and nothing happened!

  16. What a letdown by thaerin · · Score: 1

    Considering the amount of spam I deal with in a days time, I'm amazed I've never seen one mentioning the Trumpmeister. These days my top two seem to be cheap discounts on v1agra /drugs and Rolex watches. Guess I'm in the minority, gone are my days of penis patch adverts. I guess there's always tomorrow and another unscrupulous a-hole who will add me to one of his lists to ensure that I gain 1 to 3 inches.

    --
    If big boobed women work at Hooters do one legged women work at IHOP?
    1. Re:What a letdown by shawb · · Score: 1

      My guess is that since these stats are put out by AOL, this is in reality a "Top ten spam subject lines recieved by AOL servers."

      Some spammer who used the Donald Trump thing probably decided to simply try [lots of potential email addresses]@aol.com. AOL users have a stereotype of being less computer literate, (or at least less "net savy*") and so more likely to actually make money for spammers.

      *Man, I do hate that term. Up there with "Information superhighway" and the whole late 90's trend of putting an e before anything that had to do with computers: e-commerce, e-business, e-culture, e-personality and so on. For a while it got me even annoyed at the word e-mail (it's email in my mind: one word)

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  17. It's been said before by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

    by those with a greater style than I, but it's worth saying again:

    If you have to get sneaky or sleazy to try and sell your products, perhaps it's a sign no one wants it?

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:It's been said before by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      If you have to get sneaky or sleazy to try and sell your products, perhaps it's a sign no one wants it?

      Most places doing this are scammer/phishers, not legitimate businesses. Thus, they are already sleazy and will do anything they can to get people to click on the links.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:It's been said before by Hymer · · Score: 1

      You mean like a big US software corporation which are sneaking their below average products on any bloody PC I buy ?
      ...and wich is yelling out that a free (as in beer) and far superior product is more expensive than their product ?
      --
      [A]bort, [R]etry, [F]ail

    3. Re:It's been said before by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Actually, plenty of people want viagra and porn. We get so much spam, because it is so effective, and so many people want the products. As to being sneaky and sleazy - that describes every advertiser and marketer out there. You don't stay in business long by being nice and wholesome. Fundamentally the whole consumer/capitalist society is a sleazy, sneaky thing. But we love it because we are whores.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  18. Change of Tactics?? by Ed+Almos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm wondering if the spammers are changing tactics. I used to get one spam message at a time but now I get up to a dozen messages from the same slimeball, all with the same subject line. I can't figure out why they do this because it makes spam filtering easy, more than one message with the same subject line and into the bit bucket you go.

    Anyone know why this is happening?

    Ed Almos

    --
    The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus, 56-120 A.D.
    1. Re:Change of Tactics?? by lbrandy · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering if the spammers are changing tactics. I used to get one spam message at a time but now I get up to a dozen messages from the same slimeball, all with the same subject line.. Anyone know why this is happening?

      Because the wonders of the uniq command have not yet descended to their circle of hell yet?

    2. Re:Change of Tactics?? by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Actually, I started noticing this as well, but what was peculiar is these, of all the mail that I got, was somehow NOT being flagged as spam (or possible spam for that matter). Upon some minor investigation, the email coming across actually did have other charactors in the subject, just wierd non-ascii ones you generally cant see. I imagine this, plus some randomness in the actual body, and spam filters get pretty baffled. At least for now

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:Change of Tactics?? by 7macaw · · Score: 1

      >Anyone know why this is happening? Perhaps, they don't bother to synchronize zombie systems' progress through the recepients list? Each email is actually slightly different and comes from a different IP...

  19. Need vengeance? by lheal · · Score: 0, Troll
    I'd like to find these morons running these machines...

    I think they found you first.

    But besides, wouldn't it be much nicer to crap down the neck of the marketing genius who designed the operating system responsible for the mess in the first place?

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
    1. Re:Need vengeance? by burning-toast · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, E-mail has been around a lot longer than most any operating system in existence today. Just the abuse of that system has been made easier because of the caliber of the majority of the users on the "operating system responsible for the mess in the first place" that you allude to.

  20. Wouldn't that require a change of TOS? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

    Just seems to me like an ISP has to get permission from the user before blocking any email. It has to be an opt-in thing. AOL can't unilaterally junk stuff right now (and not even put it in a "spam" folder) because it violates some rule.

    1. Re:Wouldn't that require a change of TOS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They most certainly can block email. For example, AOL blocks email from domains with a residential IP (as do many other mail services). I now have to route my outgoing mail through Comcast instead of directly sending it out.

  21. I'm just upset because by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

    Paris Hilton never writes me any more :(

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:I'm just upset because by 7macaw · · Score: 1

      That's because you're not as cool as I am!
      I get invitations to view exclusive "Paris Hilton & Nicole Richie video clips , pictures & more" every day. They even send me my personalized download manager and it works swell!

    2. Re:I'm just upset because by anticypher · · Score: 1

      I've never stayed there, I tend to stay at the Sofitel when in France. They keep sending me photos of some naked woman, but they aren't viewable on a Solaris Sparc station. I guess I'm missing out on something, but I really don't have any desire to find out.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
  22. Donald Trumps Penis Patch? by colonslashslash · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Donald Trump and "penis patch" were the most popular subject lines used by spammers this year, as the fraudsters grew more sophisticated in trying to trick consumers"

    Oh yeah, they are getting really sophisticated in their trickery. Who wouldn't open an email with the subject line of "Donald Trump's Penis Patch"?

    --
    She's built like a steak house, but she handles like a bistro....
    1. Re:Donald Trumps Penis Patch? by Kelson · · Score: 1

      They sound as sophisticated as a bunch of Aristocrats!

  23. Penis Patches.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Penis Patches are of course for Penis Pirates (to go with the little penis parrots)

    Yaaaaaaaaaaargggggh! Avast! I see booty

    (etc etc etc)

    1. Re:Penis Patches.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean booby?

    2. Re:Penis Patches.... by Joe+Random · · Score: 1

      It's driving me nuts!

  24. And coming to an email client near you in 2006... by Billosaur · · Score: 2, Funny
    • I have this great Sony DRM removal tool
    • Martha Stewart wants to have your child
    • Your dry-cleaning is ready
    • Stock Tip: Microsoft (MSFT)
    • Get 1,000,000 hours of free AOL
    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
  25. "Sophisticated", eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yeah, with subjects like "Donald Trump", "penis patch" and "Thank you Your $199 Rolex Special Included", it's obvious those fraudsters are getting more and more sophisticated with their spam.

  26. This really shows where America is at... by deathbyzen · · Score: 0
    We're Fat

    We're Insecure

    We're Consumers

  27. Good reminder to... by giaguara · · Score: 1

    actually check my hotmail account.

    125 messages in my inbox of which 125 messages are spam.
    18 messages in spam folder.

    i don't even bother to read the titles, just select all and report spam.

    as long as the spammers are happy with my hotmail account, and my work email gets nothing else than "next to kin" offers of all those Nigerians living in a concentration camp somewhere in Africa to transfer me their millions of $, I'm fine. My custom made filter for Nigerian scams works, and the spam in hotmail has not ceased to amaze me in these 10 years. Well past caring about my own statistics.. maybe I bother for next year.

  28. Dear Mr. Trump by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Dear Mr. Trump,


    I have found your "patch" to yield little to no desirable results after 30 days. YOU are fired!


    Please do not contact me with any more offers for your substandard products. A man in your position should reconsider the effects of such ventures on your public standing


    - AC

  29. depends... by pe1chl · · Score: 2, Informative

    A listing of this week's subjects:

              10 Subject: Re:
                4 Subject: IMPORTANT MESSAGE
                3 Subject: BE INFORMED ( UNCLAIMED - PRIZE)
                2 Subject: UK LOTTERY WINNING NOTIFICATION Batch: 074/05/ZY369
                2 Subject: AWAIT YOUR URGENT REPLY
                1 Subject: àúä äåìê ìâìåú àú îä ùàó àçã ìà øåöä ùúãò...
                1 Subject: contact your claims agent
                1 Subject: Your Urgent Attention Is Required
                1 Subject: WINNING NOTIFICATION LETTER.
                1 Subject: Urgent Funds for Investment.
                1 Subject: TRUSTING YOU IN ACTUALIZING THIS
                1 Subject: THANKS
                1 Subject: REQUEST ASSISTANCE/PARTNERSHIP .
                1 Subject: REPLY TODAY PLEASE!!!
                1 Subject: RE: URGENT RESPONSE NEEDED
                1 Subject: Please kindly get back to me.
                1 Subject: PRIVATE AND URGENT
                1 Subject: PRAY FOR ME
                1 Subject: PLEASE TREAT URGENTLY-------
                1 Subject: PLEASE ASSIST
                1 Subject: ONLINE DRAWS
                1 Subject: NOTICE
                1 Subject: NEED YOUR REPLY
                1 Subject: Mrs. Nora Walters(Benefactor).
                1 Subject: Mrs Mary Koffi/ Michael son.
                1 Subject: Martinez
                1 Subject: MY INTRODUCTION
                1 Subject: LAST WINNING NOTIFICATION$$$
                1 Subject: INVESTMENT
                1 Subject: Hope to hear from you soonest.
                1 Subject: Good day
                1 Subject: From: DR. JOSEPH
                1 Subject: FROM DR IBRAHIM DABLA
                1 Subject: FRANCIS SULE
                1 Subject: FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION
                1 Subject: FINAL WINNING NOTIFICATION!!!
                1 Subject: Expecting your response.
                1 Subject: Dear Friend.
                1 Subject: Contract Payment From Central Bank Of Nigeria
                1 Subject: Congratulations! You won...
                1 Subject: COULD YOU BE ENTRUSTED WITH US$50,000,000 (?)
                1 Subject: CONTACT YOUR CLAIM AGENT
                1 Subject: CONGRATULATIONS- YOU JUST HIT THE JACKPOT.
                1 Subject: CALL FOR LOTTERY CLAIM!!!!!!!!!!!
                1 Subject: ATTENTON////Pascoe???

    Apparently I get a different kind of spam than AOL.

    1. Re:depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, looks like the 419 scamers love you.

    2. Re:depends... by Psykus · · Score: 1

      1 Subject: àúä äåìê ìâìåú àú îä ùàó àçã ìà øåöä ùúãò...

      http://ualuealuealeuale.ytmnd.com/ ?

    3. Re:depends... by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Interesting. My Gmail account (which is forwarded to by my ol' university accounts, which have been public for far too long) rarely gets 419s these days.

      About 200 spam per day tends to be find its way there, mostly

      - pharma spam (including 'herbals' and genitalia enlargement)
      - stock pumping
      - spams I can't read because they're in Korean
      - spams I can't read because they're in Chinese
      - w4r3z (HUGE spike lately, of identical spams, pretending to sell 'OEM' software and 'instant downloads')
      - spams I can't read because they're in Hebrew (waning)
      - fake diplomas (recent upswing)
      - online casinos (waning)

      I've also gotten the odd spam from an Austrian pr0n site (in German), and a very very occasional French spam from what appears to be a Canadian-based retailer of books and music (!), and the odd Russian bride site. But it's been a while since the last 419.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    4. Re:depends... by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      They have little reason to, as every one of those was reported to the sending provider (usually Hotmail or MSN) and the provider of the dropboxes (usually Yahoo or Walla). I wrote a script to do that, so it is little effort.

      I always wonder why MSN/Hotmail, being the largest 419 scam distributor, does not do some spamscanning on outgoing mail. Those 419s are very easy to catch, at least for my SpamAssassin filter.

    5. Re:depends... by SD_92104 · · Score: 2, Informative
      A listing of this week's subjects:
      At least your subjects make sense - here is a sample of the last few I got:

      see homophobia, Brew but iron
      The finish a clansman pothead
      Re: It swim the mangrove
      on Barth, may coney
      An fall it fearful zippy
      on break he steamboat
      I just found out about her. megalomania mantic
      Re: in do no bedside effectiveness

      But then, maybe I am just too stupid to understand all the great things I am missing due to my spam filter...
    6. Re:depends... by Crizp · · Score: 1

      Haaa haaaaaaahaha, roflmao :)

    7. Re:depends... by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. hmmm someone clue me in on the funny. Do they spell words, or pictures...what? =P

    8. Re:depends... by ChocoBean · · Score: 1
      hmmmm may i offer a translation?

      See homophobia -- true but ironic,
      They finish at Clansman Pothead --
      (Re) It swam the mangrove.

      On Barth, many coney
      And fall its fearful zippy

      On break, he steamboat:
      "I just found out about her." -- megalomania mantic --
      (Re) n I dono bedside effectiveness

      And now it's a "new age" poem!!

  30. Top 10 criminal verdicts against spammers? by swb · · Score: 0

    Were there even 10?

    When will the FTC/DOJ/FBI/DEA ever get their collective acts together and start jailing people for criminal fraud? Why aren't there RICO prosecutions against the individuals and institutions backing spam enterprises? Can it really be that hard to follow the money trail?

    Or is the answer one or more of the following:

    1) Too busy trying to find Osama
    2) Too busy busting bong makers
    3) Too busy watching, er, catching porn makers
    4) Spammers are *entreprenuers*, not con men, and this administration is pro-business..
    5) Laura Bush approves of prez's new-found stamina, can't cut off his supply of enhancements..

    1. Re:Top 10 criminal verdicts against spammers? by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      When will the FTC/DOJ/FBI/DEA ever get their collective acts together and start jailing people for criminal fraud? Why aren't there RICO prosecutions against the individuals and institutions backing spam enterprises? Can it really be that hard to follow the money trail?

      Oh, maybe because some of them are based in other countries whom we do not have extradition treaties with?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Top 10 criminal verdicts against spammers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We respect treaties now?

    3. Re:Top 10 criminal verdicts against spammers? by swb · · Score: 1

      I don't doubt that some spam networks are controlled overseas, but I still believe that a lot of the dollars get handled here first, which is why RICO prosecutions would be so effective, since the middlemen would be just as guilty since they are participants in the conspiracy.

  31. Donald Trump would say with a new hand move... by antdude · · Score: 1

    "You need a bigger penis!" :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    1. Re:Donald Trump would say with a new hand move... by murayava · · Score: 1

      Yes and I am sure you are one to know this type of information.

      --
      THE (beat that!)
  32. so... by Tachikoma · · Score: 1

    ... you're telling me i won't be recieving my Penis Patch Body Wrap anytime soon?


    dammit!

    --
    i don't care
  33. Insidious, crafty, devious, and dangerous? by aconkling · · Score: 1
    While the volume of spam reaching AOL email inboxes has remained at low levels compared to it's height in late 2003, the spam that's out there is more insidious, crafty, devious, and dangerous than ever," Charles Stiles, AOL's postmaster who helps direct its spam-fighting unit, said in a statement.
    With this coming from AOL's postmaster, it's no wonder AOL users get so much spam.
  34. Stupid assholes by wetfeetl33t · · Score: 1

    When I read articles like that, I lose faith in the so called "human intelligence"

    1) What kind of person would send an email with "Penis patch" in the title
    and
    2) What kind of person would actually open it/view attachements.

    --
    Register the editry.
    1. Re:Stupid assholes by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      People who actually want penis patches? I don't know, maybe someone was hoping that if their boyfriend wore one they can stop taking birth control pills. Or someone was hoping that the patch can break their porn watching habit like a nocotine patch. or ...i don't know.

      Humanity remains hopeful, and that's where we go wrong most of the time.

      Personally I prefer the theory that says the real scam is taking money from advertisers who choose to advertise with spam. That they do not in fact make money from click-sales from spam. That sleezy jerks win sometimes, but sleezy idiots don't win.

      *sigh* yeah I still have hope in humanity....

  35. Wait... by Kaioshin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...so they read the e-mails of their clients?

    Let's say I get some great real-estate offers in my email account. I choose to report it as spam, once. AOL or anyone else gets this mail and they can analyze it or do anything they want with it.
    The next day I get an identical mail and it gets sent to the SPAM folder. Do they have the ability to see this one as well? What if one that isn't spam gets marked as such, but contains sensetive and personal information? ...so is this either "Top 10 Reported spam subject lines" or are they invading our privacy?

    1. Re:Wait... by Nephilium · · Score: 1

      Well... ummmm... you are aware that e-mail isn't a secure communication medium... right?

      If you don't want people reading your mail, you have one option. Have people sending you mail, and people you send mail to encrypt it.

      Nephilium

  36. Penis patch? by EnsilZah · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, i for one am happy to see the makers of penis are fast to respond to the latest penis exploits.

    1. Re:Penis patch? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Bless you brother, best laugh I've had all day.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Penis patch? by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Hey, penis security problems are no laughing matter!
      I know this one guy who caught a virus through penis and couldn't get his system back up for like a week, totally currupted his hard drive. =\

    3. Re:Penis patch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon, this is Slashdot, nobody has any penis exploits.

    4. Re:Penis patch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just thinking how uncomfortable it would be to get a puncture in your penis.

  37. Mortgage / lending spam by bigberk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For some time, I have been closely tracking levels of mortgage/lending/credit spam received on several email accounts. I am doing this because I am interested in the lending business and hope to see levels of spam correlate with activity in the industry.
    Anyway you can find my data here:
    http://www.perpetualbull.com/mortgage-spam/
    Various regex are used to locate spams of this topic. Not 100% accurate but pretty good

  38. names? by revery · · Score: 1

    question, is that "names" as in "AOL identifies Top Spam Subjects For 2005", or names as in "AOL makes up Top Spam Subjects For 2005"?

    Just wondering...

  39. Penis patch by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    Heh, funny, i thought you'd be more likely to write about the penis patch... =\

    1. Re:Penis patch by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      amatures....

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
  40. Anyone else? Korean Ads by Namronorman · · Score: 1

    Anyone else get a LOT of Korean advertisement? Some of these products are so weird, I have no clue as to what they are. It's the only spam I mind, it's actually quite funny some of the emails I get. The intervals of Korean advertisement, unfortunately, has been increasing though.

    --
    $fortune
    Tomorrow has been canceled due to lack of interest.
    1. Re:Anyone else? Korean Ads by Psykus · · Score: 1

      I've been getting Japanese spam lately, and more recently, French. Perhaps my New Year's Resolution should be to get spam from all over the world?

    2. Re:Anyone else? Korean Ads by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      If you search for "Korean spam" on USENET, you'll find that you're hardly alone. ROK systems -- notably KORNET -- have a reputation for combining oddles of bandwidth with a disregard for spam complaints, and they're outside the jurisdiction of the FTC or other non-ROK enforcement bodies...

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    3. Re:Anyone else? Korean Ads by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Try clicking on the "I don't want this" button for a while. Especially those that link to a URL with the word "cotegory" (sic).
      (unfortunately they always link to a form where you once again have to enter your e-mail address, sometimes with a dropdown list of domainnames of which you have to select the last one, which apparently means "other", to enable the entry of a full user@domain address)

      I know it is contrary to widespread advice, but with Korean mail it really helps! Apparently they have effective anti-spam laws that forbid sending of mail to users who have opted out.

    4. Re:Anyone else? Korean Ads by Namronorman · · Score: 1

      I don't really mind, doesn't affect my main email account. Actually, I find a lot of it to be funny.

      Interesting how it sounds like that works for Korean advertisement, shame they're all not like that. Oh well. Thanks for the advice though!

      --
      $fortune
      Tomorrow has been canceled due to lack of interest.
  41. According to my spam archive.. by riflemann · · Score: 1

    I've kept every spam caught by myself or spamassassin for the past couple of years and have just checked the top 10 subjects of the spam caught:

            380 Subject: Remember the old days?
            442 Subject: Impotence treatment
            443 Subject: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
            467 Subject: Re:
            534 Subject: Message subject
            861 Subject: New product! Cialis soft tabs.
            932 Subject: Tadalafil Soft Tabs - Great results!
            933 Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
          1024 Subject: The Ultimate Online Pharmaceutical
          1030 Subject: failure notice

    Not sure how accurate this is, but it's all from SA. Seems I'm targetted for pharmaceuticals (though i dont need them, really!)

    1. Re:According to my spam archive.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I've kept every spam caught by myself or spamassassin for the past couple of years

      You really need to get laid, in a big way :-)

    2. Re:According to my spam archive.. by riflemann · · Score: 1

      just 5 minutes on procmail and bash scripting left me with *plenty* of time to be with my woman :)

      Its the geeks who don't automate tasks that fail to get laid...

  42. The Essential Spam Quote of the Day by Toxicgonzo · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a perfect world... spammers would get caught, go to jail, and share a cell with many men who have enlarged their penisses, taken Viagra and are looking for a new relationship.

    http://bash.org/?203815

  43. Don't need to block port 25. Bad idea in fact. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    The patterns used by worms and spammers are extremely noticeable. You can identify them with Snort (free software) and you can slow them down with a tarpit (free software). It's almost impossible not to see the worms, in particular, if you are doing the most basic sorts of network monitoring in order to allow proper network management.

    It'd be easy to block infected machines, and machines that are spamming, using the DOCSIS cable modem (which is controlled by the ISP, not the end user). Reroute all traffic to and from infected machines to a special "hey you are infected here are some antidotes" network and charge the antivirus companies for the privilege of hawking their products and services on that network.

    Easy, that is, for a highly competent and experienced network engineer. Which is to say someone who commands a higher salary than the greedy broadband ISPs are apparently willing to pay. Instead they hire people who think port-blocking customers is reasonable (that is, inexperienced people) and incompetents who can't even figure out how to run a web cache (also available as free software) without getting themselves in trouble.

  44. Naming by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    Since AOL gets to name them, does that make it their parent?

  45. How is this "more sophisticated"? by Rick+Genter · · Score: 1
    "Donald Trump and "penis patch" were the most popular subject lines used by spammers this year, as the fraudsters grew more sophisticated in trying to trick consumers, America Online said Wednesday in its third annual Top 10 Spam List.


    How is a subject line of "penis patch" being more sophisticated? If consumers are being defrauded by unsolicited messages with a subject line of "penis patch", I think it's a case of consumers becoming more stupid, not fraudsters becoming more sophisticated...
    --
    Don't underestimate the power of The Source
  46. Information Week oddness by Mercano · · Score: 1

    Sorta off topic, but, Information Week, did you really need spread this article over two pages when the sidebar with your ads is longer then the article itself? Go page hit count.

    --
    #include <signature.h>
    1. Re:Information Week oddness by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      That's darn near "irony" - an article about spam in which about 300% of the article space is taken up by ads - and the actual subject lines are presneted in one long, illegible sentence. :)

  47. I've heard worse ideas. by Medievalist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I'd prefer an approach that puts the burden on the infected PC owners rather than on people who actually have a clue, I'd be willing to make the phonecall.

    And your method would be simple enough that even Comcast might conceivably be competent enough to implement it. Maybe. Unfortunately I am a customer, so I'm kind of pessimistic on that front.

  48. ITYF they can read *all* your mail by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Should they choose to. Technically it's dead easy, whether they will or not depends on the terms and conditions (you did read and understand them didn't you?).

    Don't like that? Encrypt it. Emails are like postcards not letters.

    --
    Deleted
  49. Re:Don't need to block port 25. Bad idea in fact. by jtorkbob · · Score: 1

    Right.

    But any such solution creates complexity. I recently had my Comcast connection die for no apparent reason. I spent hours on the phone only to find out that it was a bug in their modem registration system and that their pre-built tools couldn't fix it. It took days to get a bug fix.

    Besides, I'm afraid such implementation would encourage the RIAA or CIA to pull some funny business...

    --
    AC: Only on slashdot... could the sentence "My hovercraft is full of eels." be moderated "+4, Insightful
  50. and um... by cyberbob2010 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    where does aol fall on this list again?
    You do realize that they send unwanted advertisements to their own customers right?
    Its not as if they are related to AOL services either. For the right price your ad can be sent by AOL to an AOL subscriber FROM AOL

    --
    We seldom regret saying too little but often regret saying too much.
    1. Re:and um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Complete with customized subject lines so this kind of aggregation won't show them.

  51. Can they? Yes. Do they? Dunno. by Kelson · · Score: 1

    They certainly have the technical ability to read it. As to whether they allow their admins and spam fighters to read it? Good question. It may be covered in the Terms of Service.

  52. Couldn't apply the patch by reset_button · · Score: 1

    I actually purchased the penis patch, but it failed to apply with "patch -p1 penis_patch" - any advice?

    1. Re:Couldn't apply the patch by reset_button · · Score: 1

      I also failed to realize that I can't use the "less than" symbol in the patch command.

  53. Sweet. by Mancat · · Score: 1

    Funniest thing I've seen in a while

    --
    hello dear sirs my name is jamesh i are india (bihar) can u guide me install red had linux 9?
  54. What about No Subject at all? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you guys, but I find a lot of spam comes in with no subject line at all, or something like Re:[20] with nothing else in the subject line. Then again, IANAOL.

  55. Did you um, uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... UNZIP it first? Man, I hope we're never in adjacent urinals....

  56. Re:And coming to an email client near you in 2006. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    # Stock Tip: Microsoft (MSFT)

    You may joke, but the Xbox 360 launched. Sure, the actual launch could have gone better due to availability - but the important thing is that they're in an excellent position to fight Sony's PS3. It's possible for Microsoft to win this round of the console wars. Also, the next generation of Windows is on the horizon and will be shipping in 2006 - bringing the next wave of software products (and the next round of Office, etc) with it. People still buy commercial software.

    And it's widely believed that Microsoft stock is due for a recovery. MS is in excellent financial health. The stock has been flat for the past 3 years, while the company has continued to make money and strengthen it's position. Based on the financials, their stock is estimated to be worth about 1/3rds more than the current price.

    Unlike, say, Apple's stock price, which is so high to be meaningless. Given the size of their profit vs their stock price, Apple's stock should be priced at half current values.

  57. I always keep my penis up-to-date by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Always update your penis regularly with the latest patches. It is effective security against viruses and bugs. Just don't use Microsoft patches, as they cause shrinkage and floppiness.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  58. A spam filter that works by hutchike · · Score: 1

    Finally I've found a spam filter that works - www.mail-filter.com - it uses disposable email addresses, RBL's and spam signatures to weed out the chaff. Seriously, this is the MessageLabs for the people...

    --
    Zen tips: Pay attention. Don't take it personally. Believe nothing.
  59. Penis patch, eh? by Kremit · · Score: 1

    Penis patch? Is this for those unlucky times when your penis has sprung a leak?
    (Yes, I know what a penis patch is... some of these subject lines just crack me up)

    Anyway... I actually have any spam caught on my mail server (several hundred per day) forwarded to an IMAP account that my roommate checks. The first thing he does in the morning is to laugh his ass off at spam subject/body lines for about 15 minutes. Some of my favorites from today are:

    Penis Launcher
    up! no down
    Greetings, white man! :)
    Re: hobgoblin belong
    Hardly of age teen cutie taking it deep in all holes. forever
    Did you have a sex yesterday? real
    It seems to be an appropriate way to say hello to OOP lovers :)
    The world is getting bigger; your penis has to get bigger too.

  60. Home vs Work by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 1

    I get a completely different selection of spam on my home and work email accounts.

    At work it's 99% online pharmaceuticals. They charge less but give better service, apparently. All 1000 of them.

    At home it's sex ads, fake prestige watches and some moron who bombards me with inane stock tips. Possibly morons, because they use two different ways of getting past spam filters.

    Then there are the usual subterfuges, like the all-graphics email, the emails with blank times to screw up inbox date sorting, and the random words email subjects (just what the fuck does "that begin an exclusion seventeen" mean, anyway?).

    The less said about my various hotmail accounts the better. Shudder.

    ...laura

  61. sorbs sux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At any given time, I am on or off sorbs naughty list, because if you are on dialup, you can get assigned a number when you logon that previously was issued to some zombified windows machine. This situation applies to me, and trying to get sorbs to "fix" the situation is pointless. Yes, that makes SO much sense to tar someone else with the clueless brush. Idiots. Well meaning I guess, but truly, they are morons. Here's a better idea from a strictly technical and practical standpoint: automatically include *any windows operating system detected*, blacklist them until they go through a once a month (or weekly or daily, I don't care) check to see they aren't spam spewers before they can use email. Makes more sense and would actually work, and would shift the blame squarely where it belongs, to the redmond profits at any cost internet polluters. Really, spam is 99% a windows and windows users problem, let's just call it like it really is, 'K?

  62. most of mine are from Asia by qzulla · · Score: 1

    This is an example:

    iuxm.lmeoerzyh@msa.hinet.net FW:1Äv¼Ð ®É©|¥]¥] ¥@ɦWö

    I have no idea what they are selling as I don't read Chinese/Japanese/Korean/

    So what is the point of sending them to me?

    qz

  63. The more things change (2004) by slowbad · · Score: 1
    AOL's previous Top Spam E-Mail Subject Lines:

    special offer
    As seen on oprah
    Online degree
    Viagra online
    Lowest insurance rates
    Hot teen action
    XANAX online
    lower your mortgage rates
    Get out of debt
    Hot porn action
    Online pharmacy
    Get Bigger
    Lowest mortgage rates
    online prescriptions
    Hot XXX action
    lower your insurance now
    improve your sex life
    meds online
    satisfy your partner
    Valium online
    online diploma
    refinance

    : Today on Oprah:
    :
    : A special offer to get your online pharmacy degree by refinancing and
    : lowering your insurance. Sexy teens will want you. Free meds for life!

  64. No one could stand such torture! by ScottCooperDotNet · · Score: 1

    A hundred and fourteen years of AOL? No one could stand such torture!

  65. Re:Don't need to block port 25. Bad idea in fact. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You probably talked to someone in texas, feeding you BS. They really dont know how to workaround the quirks in the provisioning system, so they have to send it to someone in Newfoundland to fix (which is why it took 24-72 hours). If you talk to someone in Canada (Alberta, Newfoundland, surprisingly they have better training than the American outsourced ones) they probably could have fixed it in 3 minutes.

    and yes I do work for comcast.

  66. Topping next year's list by arun_s · · Score: 1

    lol no this am not a virus!

    --
    I can explain it for you, but I can't understand it for you.
  67. comcast DOES block port25 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I dont know about other ISPs, but Comcast *does* block port 25, when the system autodetects spam.

    Usually it results in "my emails aren't going out what is wrong", and then an explanation of zombie botnets and how people like them are sending the spam they are getting in their mailbox.

    Usually they get their computer cleaned out, send an email to an email address with the MAC of their cable modem, and they can send emails again.

    Posted anonymously so I dont get this pinned on me at work :)

    Better than a blanket blocking of Port25, and pretty effective.

  68. Re:Don't need to block port 25. Bad idea in fact. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    While I understand your point (Alan Robertson likes to say "Complexity is the enemy of reliability") there is a necessary level of complexity required to provide a decent service.

    Would it be acceptable for a doctor to hire nurses and receptionists with infectious typhus, if that cost him less money, or somehow simplified his office routines?

    Why is it acceptable for broadband ISPs with billion-dollar budgets to create a breeding pit for worms and viruses, when they could just hire more capable staff and solve the problem by increasing the level of complexity their staff could handle?

    Because they have geographic monopolies, the large ISPs don't have to provide decent service. Remember Lily Tomlin's old routine? "Sir, we are the phone company. We are a monopoly. We don't care, because we don't have to." A little dated since the breakup of Ma Bell but it seems those days are coming back again.

    As for the RIAA, you are probably right that a cleaner network worldwide would help them with their nefarious schemes. The CIA, on the other hand, is probably quite happy knowing millions of zombie computers are available to them at any time. Plausible deniability is easy to come by under such circumstances.

  69. Re:Don't need to block port 25. Bad idea in fact. by jtorkbob · · Score: 1

    Well, as I previously implied, I've always been very happy with the quality of my connection to Comcast, even if their customer service sufferes from perhaps a minimum of typical corproate ailments. Working with other broadband providers out this way, I've often had big gripes. MSN DSL didn't even provide an SMTP server - perhaps they still don't. Comcast is fast and reliable. That's all I really need. Then again, if they screwed that up, I might be willing to go back into the market.

    --
    AC: Only on slashdot... could the sentence "My hovercraft is full of eels." be moderated "+4, Insightful
  70. Where do you live, if that's not too personal? by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    You're the first person I've ever heard describe Comcast as "fast and reliable". You must not be in Delaware!

    I've been a customer of theirs for five or six years now, and I've been on several different segments.

    I've completely replaced my firewall box 3 times, my cable modem twice, and all my internal wiring twice, because Comcast insisted that my problems must be my fault. Eventually I discovered that every single person in my neighborhood had the same problems and confronted Comcast with this (the neighbors claim they had reported their problems already, but I dunno really) so they sent a guy out who determined that the ground on the pole at the end of the street was no good. Before he made this determination (which eliminated 80-90% of the outages, incidentally) he rewired everything between the pole and my house, creating an incredibly baroque +60' cable run that went all over the place and involved repeatedly puncturing the drip cap tin on my back porch roof, which compromised my waterproofing. When I got home from work I cut it down to a 25' run that went directly from the pole to my entry point and caulked all the extraneous holes with silicon; after that the service was comparitively good (only a couple of 1 to 5 minutes total service interuptions a day).

    A weird side effect of this incident was that I started getting 3 or 4 cable channels on my TV that I hadn't signed up for; after a few months, though, they went away again.

    Despite all my whining about Comcast's incredibly unreliable, slow (due to thousands of worms which attack my firewall all day long), and poorly designed service (ever look at their DNS setup?) it's the only thing I can get at this time. Unless I was willing to steal wireless from my neighbor, but he's on Comcast anyway.