Slashdot Mirror


When Does Maturity Set In?

An anonymous reader writes "Two Dartmouth researchers claim that they are one step closer to discovering at what age human maturity sets in. From the article: 'For the study, Baird and graduate student Craig Bennett looked at the brains of nineteen 18-year-old Dartmouth students who had moved more than 100 miles to attend college. A control group of 17 older students, ranging in age from 25 to 35, were also studied for comparison. The results indicate that significant changes took place in the brains of these individuals. The changes were localized to regions of the brain known to integrate emotion and cognition. Specifically, these are areas that take information from our current body state and apply it for use in navigating the world.'"

300 comments

  1. It depends... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

    For ordinary people or those of us on Slashdot?

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    1. Re:It depends... by jimmyhat3939 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I think 18 year olds are just as mature as those who are 35 or even 45 years old. Moreso in most cases.

      --
      Free Conference Call -- No Spam, High Quality
    2. Re:It depends... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's because you don't really appreciate being 18 until you're 35.

      Ouch, my arthritis!

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    3. Re:It depends... by Ucklak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What an almost pointless study.
      Maturity sets in when responsibility is a requirement.
      Environment plays a heavy in maturity.
      Multiple siblings I'm sure plays a role vs that of an only child as well as a parental death or divorce.
      Circle of friends plays a role and none of this is an age requirement.
      I've seen 10 year olds whose had a parent killed with more maturity than a 16 year old. That 10 year old will be a more mature 16 year old than a 20 year old drinking it up in a small college town.
      A 22 year old with a handle on debt will be more mature than a 34 year old that is a renter in suburbia that is adamant that you can't make money in real estate.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    4. Re:It depends... by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A 22 year old with a handle on debt will be more mature than a 34 year old that is a renter in suburbia that is adamant that you can't make money in real estate.
       
      There are many instances where it makes more financial sense to rent than to "own."

    5. Re:It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There are many instances where it makes more financial sense to rent than to "own."
      Agreed.

      But that does not mean that "you can't make money in real estate." Regardless of whether it makes sense for any given individual to rent or own at any given moment in time, real estate remains a very good way to make money in general.

    6. Re:It depends... by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think we're talking about generalities here. When one particular person becomes "mature" is really irrelevent. If you were talking about height there's certainly 12 year olds that're taller than a 30 year old. That doesn't mean that there's not such a thing as growth spurts, and an age when most people are "full grown".

      I also think there's a difference in brain maturity and being responsible. The researchers aren't studying "being responsible" as that would be quite hard to define and compare among different people in any kind of objective way. What they're studying is difference in brain structure, at different ages. What it sounds like they've found out is that generally speaking there is still brain development going on after age 18. To anyone that ever sees a lot of 18-20 year olds, compared to say anyone over 24 or 25 that really shouldn't be much of a surprise.

      --
      AccountKiller
    7. Re:It depends... by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "Maturity sets in when responsibility is a requirement."

      The hell it does. You haven't noticed the "immature, unable to get along with others" segment of our society (which has a broad age range)?

      Perhaps you were referring to children thrust into situations (like your example) being able to survive. Note: survival != maturity. It only equals acting appropriately to survive.

      There is an element of CNS physical maturity in the resultant overall appearance of maturity. The CNS is not done developing until late teens at best, so yeah, there's an age element to maturity.

    8. Re:It depends... by CyricZ · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You're only suffering from arthritis?! Wait until impotency sets in, and then you'll really wish you were 35 again, let alone 18.

      --
      Cyric Zndovzny at your service.
    9. Re:It depends... by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maturity sets in when responsibility is a requirement.

      Seems to me you're exhibiting the same logical fallacy you're projecting on the study: confounding correlation with causation.

      But before you can argue correlation or causation, you need to have data. As far as uselessness of the study, you're ignoring the importance of variation in the population as well. It's all well and good to say people get more mature as they get older, but it isn't always true, nor is always true in the same way. These variations are highly significant on a day to day basis, we're all aware of them, but in a very imprecise fashion.

      Subjective impressions may do to be going on with, but precise and reproduceable data is more useful to the process. Normative data has to be the first step, even though it is of limited interest in itself. Once you have your baseline data, then you look at exceptional individuals and see what insight they give you into the process, for example the person who never moves out of his parent's house, or who never seems to learn no matter how many times he's burned.

      Maybe at that future date you have complementary normative anatomical or neuroscience data to work with too showing precisely how a 34 year old brain functions differenly from an 18 year old one. This doesn't explain why 34 year olds are more mature.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:It depends... by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      Real estate remains a very good way to make money in general.

      I'm still not following that statement from the 34yr old. Is he talking about buying real estate as an investor or just a place to live and betting on appreciation? As an investor there are easier ways to play the RE market through equities rather than owning physical property.

    11. Re:It depends... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Thanks. That made me feel better in an evil kind of way.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    12. Re:It depends... by Ucklak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm quipping from personal experience.
      Renter in suburbia (to me) implies someone who isn't mobile and is planted within the community with no intention of moving.
      There are plenty of times when renting is a sound choice and I'm not knocking renting at all.

      The 34 year old I mention is actually a 54 year old that has filed bankruptcy every 10 years, lost money on a house in a booming market because he didn't want to deal with a realtor or pay 6% or negotiate, falls for most 'get rich quick' schemes and has lost a substantial amount of money in one, has flat out told me "I don't know what the fuss is about real estate, you can't make money in it and you always have to pay"
      When he did manage to get a house (after he lost money on his original house and rented for 5 years), he got a balloon mortgage and didn't plan for the end of the 5year term where the balloon payment was required so he foreclosed. He got the balloon mortgage becaue the payments were cheaper than a standard 30 year fixed. I guess he didn't know what the hell a balloon mortgage is.

      This guy only knows price and not value and I call him a scam victim because he definitely isn't a scam artist even though he thinks he's clever by buying senior citizen movie tickets ans always returns food in a restaurant so he can get a free dessert.
      My mortgage is $300 higher than his rent and he claims that he has the better deal because I'd have to pay for maintenance on the building, air conditioning and pay for water on top of a higher monthly payment.
      He doesn't get it that I'd rather pay extra when I file for personal income tax than 'get money back' because we all know that that money you 'get back' is extra money that the government gives you.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    13. Re:It depends... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      I think they're using the scientific meaning of the word maturity, meaning fully grown or fully developed. You can talk about squirrels reaching maturity; this doesn't mean they have responsibility. From one viewpoint mankind is another species of animal. At what age does this species reach maturity?

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    14. Re:It depends... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Excellent point.

      Culturally (in a typical industrialized nation), maturity can mean being independantly responsible.
      In some cultures, maturity can be when you make your first kill then, you're labeled as an adult within the community.

      I've heard that at age 95, the body stops aging. Maybe that's the magic age.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    15. Re:It depends... by infinite9 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've seen 10 year olds whose had a parent killed with more maturity than a 16 year old.

      Indeed. My wife and I adopted two children from russia. Since then, we've done a lot of research into russian children who either spent most of their time in orphanages, or were taken from their russian* parents because of abuse or neglect. There are dozens of cases where a sibling group of three children or so, made up of, say, a 2 year old, 4 year old, and 6 year old, end up with the 6 year old going out and finding food for the younger children, even to the point where the oldest child is starving so that the younger ones can eat. Some of these sibling groups end up adopted by american families. When this happens, the oldest child can't seem to let go of this parental sense of responsability for the younger kids. It's almost like part of their childhood has been lost. So I agree. I think it has to do with the presence of responsability. Nothing makes you grow up faster than having to care for a child of your own.

      * Not to single out the russians. I'm sure there are plenty of examples of this sort of bad situation in every other country including the US.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    16. Re:It depends... by GMC-jimmy · · Score: 1

      There is more than 1 type of maturity,
      - Physical maturity
      - Mental maturity
      to name 2.

      One is mandatory, and the latter is voluntary.

      --
      __________________________________
      Free your mind - Flush your toilet
    17. Re:It depends... by Retric · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "nineteen 18-year-old Dartmouth students who had moved more than 100 miles to attend college" vs "A control group of 17..."

      With a sample size that small you realy can't tell anything specific.

      I don't know how they can try and publish a study where they look at such a small sample size, and assume the diffrence between the older and younger group's brain is based on maturity. Now if they had tracked 100 people from age 12 to 30 and compared brain scans with their behavior they could get good data but this study is worthless.

    18. Re:It depends... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      You haven't noticed the "immature, unable to get along with others" segment of our society (which has a broad age range)?
      I've also noticed the difference in how kids act in school these days compared to when I was in there. Most of these kids wouldn't last a day with the environment we were in. The way they run their mouths these days, they would get the crap beat out of them by both teachers and the students back then.

      These days you can't lay a hand on anyone without being sued. Just the threat of "the Coach" coming in with the paddle with holes drilled in it (for less air resistance...haha) was enough to keep you in line. I honestly believe that had quite a bit to do with maturing....learning the morals of society do's and don'ts. Cutting in line = getting kicked in the nads....you know....essentials... before you cut in traffic and get rammed by someone with road rage later on that is.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    19. Re:It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your 54 year old isn't immature, he's stupid. There's a difference.

    20. Re:It depends... by tomhudson · · Score: 0, Troll

      I've seen 10 year olds whose had a parent killed

      Geez, the youngest I've seen a kid "off" their parents was 16 ... you people start 'em off young.

      Now, whether that's the most "mature" way to settle an argument is another question.

    21. Re:It depends... by NewKimAll · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I have an uncle that I refer to as "Drunken Uncle". He's 53, currently without a job and without a license as a result of a 2nd DUI offense. Thankfully, he has been the only victim of his drinking.... so far. He will NEVER be what people think of as "mature". Perhaps the study needs to be re-done to find out why some people, such as my uncle, never mature and what we can do about it. I figure society can only benefit from such a study, assuming there is actually something that can be done to correct the problem.

    22. Re:It depends... by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The headline is misleading. What it actually should be is:

      "What differences are there in the brains of 18 and 25-35 year-olds? Do those differences help regulate behavior in a way that we traditionally refer think of as signifying 'maturity'?"

      Unfortunately, that's too long, so we get this misleading one.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    23. Re:It depends... by hey! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh, I agree. If you think about it, it's almost a social scientific scandal that there isn't better data. Getting data is expensive and difficult.

      It's a bit of a vicious circle. Insufficient funding means weak data sets; weak data sets lead to conclusions that are heavy on speculation; overspeculative results lead to lost credibility; lost credibility means less funding.

      But I do stand by this: it's not a good idea to dismiss the very idea of social scientific research because we are satisfied with our pet personal theories.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    24. Re:It depends... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Ha!

      Obviously I mean through other than direct means. Personally, I lost a parent when I was 8 through a work related incident.
      The 10 year I speak of old lost a parent to hepatitus.

      I've also seen an 18year old female lose her mother to cancer and was a basket case for years because of it.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    25. Re:It depends... by SloppyElvis · · Score: 1

      Right on, you should get the grant money. I was going to say that for me it was when my daughter was born. Ever since that fine day its been responsibility that takes precedence over tomfoolery (unless we're playing, in which case tomfoolery is my responsibility).

    26. Re:It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      niggajews are cool.

    27. Re:It depends... by Eccles · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know what you mean.

      At 18, I could grab my manly equipment, bend it with all my might, and it wouldn't bend at all.

      At 30, I could grab my manly equipment, bend it with all my might, and it would deflects a quarter inch.

      Now at 40, I grab my manly equipment, bend it with all my might, and it deflects a half inch.

      So I'm getting stronger!

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    28. Re:It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rubbish. Everyone knows russian children don't eat.

    29. Re:It depends... by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      I don't know how they can try and publish a study where they look at such a small sample size, and assume the diffrence between the older and younger group's brain is based on maturity.


      It all depends on the variability of the thing they're studying (specific brain structures) among the population, and among the two different groups. To give you (a really boneheaded, but simple to understand) example, I could study the height of 6 month old children vs 2 year old children with very small sample sizes and come up with a conclusion that children are growing in height over that 1 1/2 years. It would be much harder to do that same study with a small sample size if I were studying the height differences between 6 month olds and 6 1/2 month olds. It's all based on normal distributions (also called a gaussian distribution). It's really too bad more people aren't exposed to statistics as it's far more applicable to everyday life than say trigonometry, or even calculus.

      The take-home is that small sample sizes aren't necessarily statistically meaningless. Probbably more problematic was the specifics they chose, Darmouth college students. That isn't exactly a random sample of the population at large.

      People here seem to be jumping up and down claiming it's totally meaningless because they didn't have a diverse enough group to study. That's just preposterous. The study doesn't really prove anything, but it's certainly very interesting and warrants a larger, and more diverse study to see what's going on. It'd also be interesting to track indiduals over the same time period and see if the same brain structures change.

      --
      AccountKiller
    30. Re:It depends... by wile_e_wonka · · Score: 1

      You don't use calculus in your everyday life?!

    31. Re:It depends... by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      of course, "moreso in most cases". we all know that we get less mature as we age.

    32. Re:It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's immature _and_ stupid. Why can't he be both? :P

    33. Re:It depends... by iamhassi · · Score: 1
      "So I'm getting stronger!"

      actually i think ur getting weaker and ur manly equipment is getting really weak, u should have a 18 yr old girl try to bend it and see what happens...

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    34. Re:It depends... by kwack · · Score: 1

      Wrong... parent is far to quick to judge. Indeed, the sample size is to small to calculate reliable quantitative estimates of the differences. Nevertheless, one may use non-parametric tests to check for whether there is a *qualitative* difference between the groups, and this is really what's claimed here.

    35. Re:It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Not to single out the russians. I'm sure there are plenty of examples of this sort of bad situation in every other country including the US.

      Plenty? I hardly think there are plenty of examples of this in America. I doubt there are plenty of examples anywhere in Europe or Canada or Australia either. This is almost entirely a 3rd world problem.

    36. Re:It depends... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      You don't need a large sample size, what's important is your p value. The p value tells you the chance that your results were due to chance. If your p value falls below the threshold for significance, (say, p = .05) then your results are statistically significant, no matter how many people are in the study. What sample size is important for is detecting small effects.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    37. Re:It depends... by ted_the_canuck · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yes. It may make sense to rent under some circumstances. If you have to move frequently for work, or if there is a housing bubble where you live, purchasing a home may not be a good choice.

      An interesting study would be to correlate brain changes with FICO scores. Fiscal responsibility and brain development might be related.

      I see in other threads that some people equate "mature" with "not having fun". I believe that it is possible to behave in a mature fashion, but still enjoy life to the fullest. It makes sense to live life as fully as possible, since life is pretty short in the big scheme of things.

      And speaking of maturity and responsibility, I better get back to work rather than burning time posting to slashdot.

      --
      ==
    38. Re:It depends... by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and I bet they would like funding to do a more thorough study. Why critisize?

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    39. Re:It depends... by fitten · · Score: 1

      I think 18 year olds are just as mature as those who are 35 or even 45 years old. Moreso in most cases.

      I used to think that, too... when I was 18. I was on my own at 17 and making my own way through life and at the time, I thought I was mature. 20 years later, I can see how immature I still was back then, even though I was more mature than pretty much anyone else I knew in that age group.

    40. Re:It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Owning" your own house and making money in real estate are two completely separate situations. A house is not an investment if you're stuck paying for it for the next 25 years, along with all the repairs and taxes you have to pay, you barely outpace inflation. Plus if you lose your job, you lose your "investment". People back in the Nortel days where both working at Nortel, had Nortel stock in their RRSP and bought a house. Guess what? They lost the house. Some "investment", hey?

      And let's say you want money NOW. How you gonna do that with a house? Sell it? You still have to live somewhere, and guess what, all the other houses increased in value as well! So the real value of a house, is a house! You want money, you have to borrow against the house. How smart is that?

      "Real estate" means you buy a bunch of crappy buildings and become a landlord. That's money in the bank.

    41. Re:It depends... by fafalone · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh shut up, you have absolutely no understanding of research. A small N design does not invalidate the results. The size of the sample is accounted for in the methods that determine whether results are significant or not. Did you even bother to look at the research methodology or did you just eyeball that number and use your (complete lack of) experience with experiment design to determine that 19 and 17 could never produce a significant result? 19 AND 17 AREN'T EVEN CONSIDERED SMALL SAMPLES IN THIS KIND OF RESEARCH, WHICH YOU WOULD BE AWARE OF IF YOU WEREN'T TOO BUSY USING YOUR MIDDLE SCHOOL UNDERSTANDING OF STATISTICS TO CALL THE RESEARCH OF PHD-HOLDING SCIENTISTS WORTHLESS INSTEAD OF ACTUALLY REVIEWING THEIR METHODOLOGY. ffs, how did this idiot get modded up to +5? Oh right, because most people here are blissfully ignorant of experiment design and statistical significance, and he's saying something that makes sense to the completely uninformed, who just go ahead and presume that makes them right.

    42. Re:It depends... by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      Personally, I lost a parent when I was 8 through a work related incident.

      You were working at the age of 8? That is mature...or illegal, I forget which.

      (Belated condolences, by the way, my aim is to ridicule English grammar, not your personal tradgedy. No offence intended; I spent my teens caring for my brother while he was dying of a brain tumor, so I'm inclined to agree with you about emotional maturity. Though it doesn't always last, obviously.)

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    43. Re:It depends... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You completely missed it there, friend. He was being sarcastic.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    44. Re:It depends... by PriceIke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, you're like, being so immature.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    45. Re:It depends... by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Did you hear a loud whooshing sound?

      [Foghorn Leghorn imitation]

      Son, I say son, it's a joke, son. I keep pitchin'm and you keep missin'm.

      Nice boy that, but about as sharp as a sackful of wet mice.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    46. Re:It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that there isn't much in this study that doesn't seem intuitively apparent. Of course one would expect 18-year-olds attending their first year of college to be more mature than they were at 17. That said, I think it'd be interesting to see more research looking at the level of maturation and the extent to which challenging life experiences play a role.

    47. Re:It depends... by dakirw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Plenty? I hardly think there are plenty of examples of this in America. I doubt there are plenty of examples anywhere in Europe or Canada or Australia either. This is almost entirely a 3rd world problem.

      A lot of children in broken families living in housing projects and the like in America might disagree. Living in those slums is almost like being in the Third World, I'd guess. Anecdotally, a lot of older children are taking care of the younger ones, especially when their parent(s) are incapacitated for some reason or other.
    48. Re:It depends... by Retric · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having tutored a PHD though quantitative methods (she had one and was working on the 2nd) I can tell you the required level of Statistical knowledge for a PHD is shit. This PHD program spent about as much time teaching them how to use SPSS as they spent trying build a foundation for understanding and applying statistics.

      Anyway, I have read fair amount of "PHD" level research in neuroscience and it's full of tiny sample sizes, which does not mean it's a good idea. The problem with those sample sizes you don't know the underlying variability. You can guess it's distributed about a "standard bell curve" and that your "representative sample's" variability relates to the overall populations variability ect. But, you don't know shit about it. This study used two self-selecting populations (people that chose to go to over 100 miles to Dartmouth at 18 or they are 25 to 35 year old collage students.) and tiny sample sizes so even if the math seems to work out they don't know shit about what's going on.

      Now, if they want to use this research to look for grant money to study what's going on fine, but don't publish this research like they discovered something.

      PS: Granted I did not read the study only the linked article, but they did not imply that the control group where freshmen only "older students" and based on the quote. "During the first year of college, especially at a residential college, students have many new experiences," I can only assume the other participants where not necessarily freshmen so this is looking more like a fishing expedition than a look into how age relates to brain maturity. Now I could be wrong in this case after you see enough misrepresentation of research you will start hearing alarm bells every time you see a tiny sample used to backup a plausible argument. After all if they had used the same methods with 12 year olds and 60 year olds and found no difference in brain development how would you have interpreted the results? It's not that their methods are sufficient but the fact that their results are so expected that makes you willing to trust their results.

    49. Re:It depends... by Kesch · · Score: 1

      This is probably implied, but you had to walk a mile uphill both to and from school in the snow, right?

      Oh, shit, I see you kept the paddle.

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    50. Re:It depends... by yusing · · Score: 1


      That's because you don't really appreciate being 18 until you're 35. Ouch, my arthritis!

      Oooo, lucky! What I wouldn't give to joost have arthritis again! -- Over 55

      --

      "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

    51. Re:It depends... by yusing · · Score: 1


      Maturity sets in when responsibility is a requirement.

      Maturity's set in when leaving home to go fight a war doesn't sound a thrill.

      A 22 year old with a handle on debt will be more mature than ...

      Let's wait to see whether the spouse he picks out doesn't spend everything he saved ....

      --

      "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

    52. Re:It depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define Ordinary. I, for one, refuse to grow up (mature). Life is way to short and there are too many things to do that are fun and immature to do.

      Or maybe I am so old I forgot being mature.

    53. Re:It depends... by jayayeem · · Score: 1

      Let's wait to see whether the spouse he picks out doesn't spend everything he saved ....

      I'd mod that up if my wife hadn't used up all my mod points.

      --
      I metamoderate, therefore I am
    54. Re:It depends... by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 1

      >>...Living in those slums is almost like being in the Third World, I'd guess....

      And you'd be completely, totally, and utterly wrong.

      I've been in both places (in the 1st, as a building inspector, in the 2nd, as a visitor) and the difference is like night and day. Americas slums still have power, water, sanitation and are more or less environmentally resistant. 3rd world slums are literal garbage dumps. Power is a concept, not a reality. Water is a death sentence. Sanitation is an unknown idea. Never mind safety from roving death squads, armed gangs, slave traders, or worse.

      I could go on, but I think you get the picture.

      --
      So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    55. Re:It depends... by blofeld42 · · Score: 1

      Right now if you live on the coasts there's an excellent chance you'll lose money--a lot of it--if you buy real estate. In my area it costs about 1/2 as much to rent a place as to buy the same place, across the whole range of housing spiffyness. People who buy condos as "investments" are having to kick in more money on top of the rental income just to meet mortgage payments. They're nowhere close to making cash flow. The affordability index is in single digits, meaning you need a top 10% income to afford a median priced house. That doesn't leave much room for more appreciation. The for-sale inventory is ballooning, and average house time on market is, too. Mortgage rates are creeping up, and a boatload of ARM mortgages are going to reset in 2006-2007. Prices are down a few percent from last spring's peak. I strongly suspect that the people who bought on interest-only mortgages in the last two years with little or no down are going to be upside down on their loans within the next 3-5 years. Perhaps by a lot. Housing is highly leveraged. If you put 10% down, and prices drop by 10%, you lose your entire down payment. With "starter" houses going for $750K around here, a 20% drop would mean you'd be out $150K. Pay twice as much for housing and get massively more risk, not to mention a soul-crushing mortgage? No thanks. Maybe I've got an immature brain, but the housing market is irrational right now. I'll bide my time and pick up something on foreclosure in a few years.

    56. Re:It depends... by Profound · · Score: 1

      >> that is a renter in suburbia that is adamant that you can't make money in real estate.

      What the hell is this about? What if he did the figures and found out that in the current environment renting is cheaper?

      Does renting money from the bank to buy property make you more noble and mature than renting property from a landlord?

    57. Re:It depends... by m4dh4773r · · Score: 1

      ...pull my finger

    58. Re:It depends... by Profound · · Score: 1

      Yep. You might like this site:

      http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/

    59. Re:It depends... by fafalone · · Score: 1

      It's just frustrating that this is supposed to be a site for people who have some appreciation of things like mathematics/statistics that go along with computer science, not to mention the scientific logic the "nerd" is associated with, and this guy comes along and calls the entire study worthless just based on the sample size. This is absolutely asinine because not only can ANY sample size produce statistically significant findings, but because it's obvious that he didn't make any effort at all to determine whether their methodology was designed well enough to allow for a reliable test of results. Even if their methodology was flawed or it turned out no significant results could be found, it's a blatant affront to every single bit of logic and knowledge related to experimental design and statistical methodology.
      This kind of thing happens, people with no common sense or experience in the relevant issue talk out their ass all the time. But the worst part of this was that it was modded to +5, and the moderation system is supposed to be here to, among other things, REDUCE THE VISIBILITY OF POSTS THAT ARE A DISGRACE TO SCIENCE. See, what makes this so bad is that his post was modded up because all those people actually thought that shit was INSIGHTFUL because it appeared to be logical only for those just as unfamiliar with statistics as the poster, so went ahead and used up a mod point without any kind of standards of quality whatsoever.
      That's happening all too often on this site, and this is an exceptionally egregious example of uninformed posts pandering to the uninformed being rewarded. And then I get modded a troll for standing up and exposing disgraceful use of the moderation system and commiting the instant-mod-down act of pointing out blatant cretinism that made the ignorant feel good about themselves for being able to agree with.
      Yes I'm being harsh because the message doesn't get through peoples thick skulls the other way.

    60. Re:It depends... by fafalone · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is how you can demonstrate an understanding of the limitations of their sample, yet do something obnoxiously stupid like call an entire studies findings worthless because of 17/19 person samples. Based on this post, you should know damn well that it's flat wrong to claim this number of people could never produce a significant result especially without reviewing their methodology. While the statistical ability of PhD holders may not be as advanced as is desirable, I assure you that it's advanced enough to know that you can't dismiss a study as worthless without reviewing their methodology because the sample size is 17 or 19. I did take the time to read the study, the authors were aware of the limitations of their sample based on size and participant pool and interpret their results with this in mind. 17 to 19 may not be a very large sample size, but it's not "tiny" either, tests of significance work fine for samples of this size if used properly, which you seem to think there's no way it could have been despite admitting you didn't read the study.

      I don't know what exactly your background is in, but it's definately not in research in the biological sciences. You noticed alot of small sample sizes in neuroscience research, so you would then contend that every study involving a sample smaller than 100 is completely invalid no matter how statistically significant their results actually were, because YOU THINK small N designs can't produce significant results? Are you actually that unfamiliar with how validity and reliability of small N designs are established while somehow able to accurately delineate the limitations of their sample, or were you just pandering to the idiots here who legitimately have no clue?

    61. Re:It depends... by fafalone · · Score: 1

      Oh, and as if you hadn't already demonstrated your complete lack of understanding of statistics, I also wanted to point out this little gem:

      Having tutored a PHD though quantitative methods (she had one and was working on the 2nd) I can tell you the required level of Statistical knowledge for a PHD is shit. This PHD program spent about as much time teaching them how to use SPSS as they spent trying build a foundation for understanding and applying statistics.

      So based on your sample size of ONE individual in ONE program, it's your conclusion that ALL PhDs require "shit" for statistical knowledge? Is your sample size of one valid BECAUSE YOU CAN TELL, but 17-19 invalid BECAUSE YOU CAN TELL AND STATISTICAL TESTS CANT, and then suddenly at 100 conclusions are valid again? Let me go ahead and inform you that a sample size of one WILL NOT produce a significant result for statistical ability of PhD holders in general, and IS NOT representative of the population of PhD holders in the biological sciences.

    62. Re:It depends... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      A quote from rom personal experience with an immature, stupid in-law:
      "you can't make money in real estate."

      This is a quick rundown, if anyone is interested, please elaborate...

      Renting money from a bank for a $150,000 mortgage:
      First year about $8,000 will be spent on the note, $1,600 of it will go to principal, $6,400 will go back to the bank - rent you could say.
      When you file for income taxes, $6,400 is deductible so if you make $52,000, you get to file that you made about $45,000 that you pay taxes on.
      Equity = $1,600 plus appreciation for the first year.

      Paying a landlord rent for similar square footage @ $850 a month = $10,200 out of pocket.
      When you file, you file on $52,000 income. Your cost of housing deducted from that takes you to $41,800 so you paid tax on $52,000 for $41,800.
      Equity = 0;

      Time and location is a different factor. If you can't stabilize either of those, obviously, renting is the better choice.

      I am aware that some real estate markets aren't lucrative but my parent comment about renting vs. owning is that you can rent for 10+ years and within that time, the real estate market will be profitable.
      I have a friend that just sold a 30+ year old house in a depressed area (big industry has moved out) for slightly above market value which is really all you hope for.

      For me, a renter in suburbia means someone who has been in the community for 5+ years and has no intention of moving. Why throw away money when you can invest it?

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    63. Re:It depends... by Profound · · Score: 1

      >> When you file for income taxes, $6,400 is deductible

      Not in my country.

      >> Equity = $1,600 plus appreciation for the first year.

      Appreciation can be negative.

      It's not hard to lose that 1600, if inflation is 3% and prices rose only 2% that year, your $1600 is gone.

    64. Re:It depends... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      >> Not in my country.

      Good call.

      >> Appreciation can be negative.

      Real estate isn't meant to be a short term investment.
      Markets fluctuate.

      If owning is such a bad thing, why not be a landlord? They seem to be making out in a renters market.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    65. Re:It depends... by cobras2 · · Score: 1

      >What an almost pointless study.
      >Maturity sets in when responsibility is a requirement.

      I think the point is supposed to be *physical maturity*... which is not about when a person *does* make good judgements, but when they are *capable* of making good judgements; which is a huge distinction.

      Then again, I may be wrong, from the quote below...
      From the article:
      "When do we reach adulthood? It might be much later than we traditionally think."

      On the other hand, some people are 5'6" tall and some are 6'8" tall.. the 5'6" people may not be as big, but they can still do most things a 6'8" person can. 18 year olds may not have brain development as 25 year olds - it doesn't mean they can't make most or possibly even all the same decisions. How do I know that? Err duh, because most of them *do* make the same judgements. Emperical evidence.
      Do you want to make it so nobody qualifies as an adult 'capable of making judgments' unless they are as smart as einstein? Some (most) people will never make it. Just like most people will never be 6'8" (unless you put them on the rack, which is kind of painful).

      (Sorry if that last paragraph was a little garbled, but I am trying to draw a connection between 'smaller now but will get bigger' and 'smaller and always will be smaller')

      Maybe the problem with what they're saying here is our concept of "adult"... adult means "a mature person" ("Webster's New World Dictionary", copyright date 1995) (which I believe means primarily 'physicaly mature', although the connotation usually includes 'mentally mature'), but do you really need to be totaly mature (physically) in order to be considered an adult (mentally) in terms of responsibility and accountability? There ought to be (well, is, usually) an age (or at least *some* measurable factor) at which, if a person is ignorant of a certain law, and brakes it, they'll still be punished.. because they *souldn't* have been ignorant of that law. They should have *educated themselves* about that law - as an adult they have that responsibility.

      So when does that age come into play? In Alberta, that age is 18; if you're younger (even a day younger) you don't actually have a resposibility to know the laws, or, really, to adhere to them. It gets a bit tricky sometimes, but that's the gist of it. So, it seems, what this article is suggesting is that age (18) ought to be extended since people aren't actually finished growing at 18.

      But what I am asking is.. so what? I lean much more towards Heinlein's view. You don't need to be fully mature in order to be held responsible under the law - in fact you *shouldn't be*! It's bad for you. You need to be held accountable as soon as you are even capable of understanding the laws - which is much younger than when you're totally physically mature.
      Puppies should not be allowed to poop in the house as long as they're not fully grown.. and children/teenagers should not be allowed to do wahtever they want as long as they're not fully grown (yes, I know, they aren't generally - but they *are* let off easier than "adults" who do the same things; and honestly, how is a 17 1/2 year old who murders someone different from an 18 year old who murders someone?).

      --
      Early bird may get the worm.. but the second mouse gets the cheese.
    66. Re:It depends... by Retric · · Score: 1

      Basic logic.

      Your assumption PHD = a good level of statistical understanding.

      Counter Example:

      A single case where a PHD program produces students with little statistical understanding.

      QED: While some PhD's might have a good understanding of statistics simply having a PHD does not equate to high level of statistical knowledge.

      I would agree that on average PhD's have a better understanding of statistic than the average 12th grader. However, there is probably some population of 12th grade students with a better understanding of statistics than some population of PhD's.

      Anyway, if you do enough research and you will get some 98+% correlations simply from the number of studies your performing but it's even worse when you do small populations studies. One of the basic assumptions in statistical analysis is that the distribution of your sample relates to the destitution of the population. When you have small sample sizes your sample's variability needs to be representative for your results to be accurate and there is no amount of statistics that will demonstrate this. The smaller the samples size the more important your assumptions become. You can't have a 20-person study that gives you a 99.99% level of certainty even if the statistics seem to point in that direction. Take a simple case study where 20 people from Nebraska and none of them are left handed but your control group has 19/20 people are left handed. What does that say about the overall population of Nebraska being left handed?

      Now if you think they did a great job then cool. I might agree with you when I read the study, but with the information I have gained so far I think their conclusion is reliable enough to warrant further study, but not enough to be worth a posting in the popular press. Doing so (for these type of studies) erodes the credibility of science as seen by the general public as a lot of these stories turn out to be false. 1 in 20 is a good gamble as far as investing in further research but it a horrible level of certainty when expounding ideas to the public. The general public does not understand the difference between a preliminary study and the scientific consensus around things like global worming so they seem to equate them and say "it's just a guess."

      PS: I would love to have a 19 in 20 chance of knowing who would win the next supper bowl but I would not bet my retirement on those odds. When I read something in the popular press that talks about a small population study I think that's nice go back and tell me what's up when you have better data it's not that I think they did I poor job I just don't have enough data to trust their results.

    67. Re:It depends... by blofeld42 · · Score: 1

      On the coasts it runs more like this:

      The lowest priced condo in my area is $400K, for which you get 800 sq ft and one bedroom. At 6% 30 year fixed and a $50K down payment that's $2,100 per month in mortgage payments. Taxes, homeowner association, and insurance will add several thousand a year to that. A comparable apartment in the same area (across the street, actually) rents for $1K. At a 30% marginal tax rate the mortgage deduction saves you perhaps $500 per month. Renting is more than $600 per month cheaper, probably $800 or more. Save and invest that.

      Of course, house prices can (and are) going down. A 20% drop in house prices--which would return them to roughly 2003 levels--means you lose $80K. Your entire down payment is wiped out, and you're $30K underwater on the loan. Can you wait it out? Maybe. But a more typical appreciation rate of 3% per year means you'll have to stay there a very long time to recoup your money, assuming you don't get a new job and move, or pop out a couple kids and move to a different neighborhood, or get divorced.

      That's at the low end of the market. A more typical starter SFH or larger condo would go for around $750K. A 20% drop there means you're out $150K. There's a very real probability that many people couldn't survive that without a bankruptcy. (In california there's a "single action" rule, meaning that the lender can only foreclose, not go after you for additional money, absent one of many exceptions, such as certain types of 2nd mortgages.) At the very least, even a well-paid household would be digging out of that for years.

      And of course on the coasts people who bought in the last three years are leveraged to the utter limits of their ability. An increase in their ARM, losing a job, and they're at the wall and facing foreclosure within months.

      Wait 3-5 years and pick up the McMansions on the cheap.

  2. Bullshit study by rylin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You're only young once, but you can be immature forever.
    God knows my colleagues agree!

    1. Re:Bullshit study by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're only young once, but you can be immature forever.

      Oh, that's wrong. It really should be: You're only young once, but you can be immature any time you want to be.

      I guess it's the perspective age brings. Now go fetch Grampa his whiskey, and mind you he knows exactly how much should be in there.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Bullshit study by popra · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      hey Grampa, Grama's been dead for 15 years, so that whiskey ain't exactly gonna help you with your sex life.

    3. Re:Bullshit study by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Funny

      lol, I agree. To be considered a mature adult you should be able to beat a 2yr old at their own game.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Bullshit study by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I have noticed that the happiest people at work are the ones that are not mature.

      The Executive VP who is always serious and demands reverence is a sad sad man. yeah he get's to drive home in his $78,000.00 Mercedes but he is still sad.

      The engineers that happily throw nerf items at each other and typically kid around are very happy people.

      Maturity = sadness.

      Now before all the sitck in the mud serious mature people show up to poke holes in what I said. Maturity != responsibility.

      You can be a 13 year old PITA in the body of a 35 year old and still be responsible. ;-P you tight ass mature people. Your life must suck not laughing and playing most of the time.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Bullshit study by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be considered a mature adult you should be able to beat a 2yr old at their own game.

      The fun of being a mature adult is allowing the two-year-old to win.

    6. Re:Bullshit study by mgblst · · Score: 1

      My experience is that everybody is sad, just some people don't realise that they are sad. I find that it is my role in life to go and inform those happy but sad people how they really feel.

    7. Re:Bullshit study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BEating them with a large stick usually does the trick.

      Management uses that as a motivational tool.

    8. Re:Bullshit study by mickwd · · Score: 1

      "Maturity = sadness."

      I suspect you do not know what you are talking about.

    9. Re:Bullshit study by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

      hey Grampa, Grama's been dead for 15 years, so that whiskey ain't exactly gonna help you with your sex life.

      No, but spending your inheritence will.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:Bullshit study by Steve525 · · Score: 1

      I think you are confusing maturity with forgetting how to enjoy life. Children seem to naturally know how to have a good time so we equate having fun with youth. Maybe it's just a question of semantics, but I disagree with your definition.

      For me, Maturity = responsibility. If you think about it, what is the one thing that defines being an adult versus a child. It's responsibility. As an adult, you are responsible for taking care of yourself (and possiblly your family) and you are responsible for your actions (at least in the eyes of the law). As a child, your family supports you financially, and you can get away with more transgressions.

      Having said that, I don't disagree with the idea behind what you are saying. Getting older and accepting responsibilities doesn't mean you have to be a stick in the mud. You do have to be careful, though, because sometimes having fun and being responsible are in conflict. (I'd love to skip work today and go see a movie, but if I do that and loose my job, I won't be able to pay my bills...). So, yes, being mature does mean you can't always have as much fun as you'd like. But being mature shouldn't mean never being silly and having a good time. (Of course, it really is a matter of semantics. When our parents yelled at us to act mature, they were, in fact, telling us to stop being silly, and stop having a good time).

      As far as the executive with the expensive car goes, I read an interesting article recently: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/gilbert03/gilbert_ index.html. It's about how we are lousy at predicting what will make us happy. Money doesn't really make us happy (once you have enough to meet your basic needs), but friends and family do.

    11. Re:Bullshit study by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Funny
      "To be considered a mature adult you should be able to beat a 2yr old at their own game."

      what game would that be? the shitting-in-diapers game?

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    12. Re:Bullshit study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why I concour old chap. Last week I was with my colleagues and were discussing the advantages of Computing your ROI on every purchase at the store when I was offered to have a dinner at the local mens club and we spend the evening discussing our new carpet in the lounge. It was a grand old time.

      Money and maturity go hand in hand and the happy people have lots and lots of money...

      Mmmm money... I think I'll make myself happy today by firing some poor sod in the office only making a paltry 100G or less.

      My god, how anyone can live or be happy on less than $500K a year I will never understand.

      I'm happy I have money and never laugh. Mmmm my money!

    13. Re:Bullshit study by yusing · · Score: 1


      You're only young once, but you can be immature forever.

      They studied normal people, not academics.

      --

      "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

    14. Re:Bullshit study by cellocgw · · Score: 1



      To be considered a mature adult you should be able to beat a 2yr old at their own game.

      The fun of being a mature adult is allowing the two-year-old to win.
      (I would have PM'd you but I guess /. doesn't have that feature)
      Funny but true: I tried the "let the kid win" trick w/ my daughter when she was 4 or 5, and she got really upset. "Daddy, I wanted YOU to win," she said. So much for parental psych :-)

      --
      https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  3. Never! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm never going to grow up! First post!!!!!

    1. Re:Never! by FinchWorld · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're never going to get first post! Grow up!!!!!

      --
      "I may be full of crap about this game, and I may be wrong, and that's fine." -Jack Thompson
    2. Re:Never! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1, Funny

      first, Grow: You're never going to get up, post!!!!!!

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    3. Re:Never! by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      My post grows when I first get up!

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    4. Re:Never! by LilGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm up when my post first grows!

      --

      You're nothing; like me.
    5. Re:Never! by popra · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, first post gets you!
      TA-DA! I'll be here all week folks!

      Ok, you may mod me down now.

    6. Re:Never! by D4MO · · Score: 1

      In Korea only old people grow up!

      *ducks*

      --

      Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
  4. Hmm, let's see... where have I seen this story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Is Slashdot ganking from Science Daily now, too?

    1. Re:Hmm, let's see... where have I seen this story? by grimJester · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slashdot's stories come from elsewhere on the web. Breaking news is reported on many sites around the web. This links to the original Dartmouth souce, as it should, rather than to the place it was first spotted by the submitter, which may well have been Science Daily.

  5. Maturity or additional Memories by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    When moving away from home you encounter a hell of a lot of new experiences and theres so much to learn and take in.

    For instance, embedding the location of the pub and distance to the nearest kebab shop are key.

    Students who cannot manage this feat rarely last a week, you see them cold hungry and sober in lectures wishing they were back at home.

    Of course your brain matures when you leave home though, you do have to adapt, because you just couldn't survive if you let your mummy do everything.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Maturity or additional Memories by ettlz · · Score: 1

      For instance, embedding the location of the pub and distance to the nearest kebab shop are key.

      Students who cannot manage this feat rarely last a week, you see them cold hungry and sober in lectures wishing they were back at home.

      And those who can manage it are seen pasty, sickly and smelly in lectures, wishing they were back at the pub.

      Dirty, noisy undergrads.

    2. Re:Maturity or additional Memories by Gabrill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ditto that. Those changes would set in at 15, if the study had included young men and women that were forced to care for themselves at that age. Maturity comes from experience, not some legislated atomically accurate age. For crying out loud, it should be obvious that you can nail people to a measuring stick!

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    3. Re:Maturity or additional Memories by greginnj · · Score: 1
      When moving away from home you encounter a hell of a lot of new experiences and theres so much to learn and take in.

      For instance, embedding the location of the pub and distance to the nearest kebab shop are key.

      Students who cannot manage this feat rarely last a week...
      Aha, so it makes sense that TFA found development in "areas that take information from our current body state and apply it for use in navigating the world" ... students that didn't have this development didn't survive the Uni environment long enough to be studied....
      --
      Read the best of all of Slash: seenonslash.com
    4. Re:Maturity or additional Memories by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      For crying out loud, it should be obvious that you can nail people to a measuring stick!

      True, but I prefer using wood screws. They really have a lot more holding power. You should give them a try sometime.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  6. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  7. 30 year old here. by fixinah · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I would just like to say POOP! *giggle*

    1. Re:30 year old here. by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 4, Funny

      I fail to see what's so funny about Professional Object Oriented Programming.

    2. Re:30 year old here. by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      I'd say the Professional part is pretty damn hilarious.

    3. Re:30 year old here. by MrNougat · · Score: 1

      I'm almost 36, and I say "poop" several times a day. Well, actually, "poopy," and in reference to diapers. I am here to tell you that poop is not a giggling matter.

      --
      Web 2.0 == Giant Blogspam Circle Jerk
    4. Re:30 year old here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that all depends, if you get to sit and watch a buddy elbow deep in poop while you and the rest of his friends are watching the superbowl...i could see humor in that. I think poop is by far one of the funniest mediums in existance just ask any stand up comedian, very often bodily functions = funny.

      wait wasnt this thread supposed to be about maturity?

        Weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

    5. Re:30 year old here. by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

      It just goes to show the maturity of Slashdot as a whole, since this is modded +5 Funny.

      --
      "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  8. "Significant changes" by user24 · · Score: 5, Funny

    From TA:

    "During the first year of college .... significant changes took place in the brains of these individuals"

    - yeah, because it's the first year of college - they're all busy pickling their brains with newly found alcohol and drugs.
    duh.

  9. The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Worthless research.

    What constitutes maturity is not exactly well defined; these fellows just seem to have chosen a bunch of criteria (ability to navigate the world my ass) and proceeded on such basis.

    The problem here isn't when people mature, that part's easy enough given an accepted definition of maturity. The problem is reaching that definition.

    Do they allow people to do research now without the prerequisite of being able to distinguish between subjectivity and objectivity?

    This research is like if I stated that the volume of an alarm clock is a good determinant of how likely one is to be a successful employee. There's just so much wrong with the premises it isn't even worth the few minutes to read.

    Bad science has a home on slashdot, I see.

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    1. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      ability to navigate the world my ass

      I agree. They moved to another state. That isn't halfway across the world. Now I know to some Americans, the concept of The World != America is a novel one. But being able to navigate to another state in America, doesn't constitute being able to navigate the world.

    2. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by chub_mackerel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's all a game of semantics, yes. The term "maturity" is a superbly dumb choice for a scientific study, since it has so many conflicting and unclear pop-science (and culture) meanings.

      Not that such a pesky fact will stop many on /. from arguing about it as if "maturity" means something concrete.

      Personally, I don't even think it's worthwhile to argue about a definition for maturity. Rather than argue about how to categorize, it seems a more fruitful path to directly study the types of psychological/mental changes that actually take place: the quantifiable ways in which the brain responds to various stimuli, what have you. It seems reasonable that these things vary as a function of aging. If that's really what the scientists are up to (I RTFA, but not TFAbstract) then it's not so worthless.

    3. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      No, it's not semantics. The human brain does not "mature", that is, cease it's major developments, until certain times in life. Yes Virginia, there is a bell curve associated with those times -- when the glands kick in, when the eyes develop, when the frontal lobes are fully functional -- but that doesn't negate the general idea that there is a time of maturity. And no, it's not "accurate" in the sense that you can set a watch by it, but that does not negate it's usefulness in psychological studies.

    4. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The research is not worthless. The real point is that the brain was changing. Typically, brain activity for people is assumed to be generally constant once adulthood is reached. That is, particular thoughts involve particular portions of the brain. This section is language, that section is long-term memory, here is short-term memory, and there is euphoria. There has been significant research into brain damage and how it changes the way the brain works (such as aphasia).

      This research indicates that the brain is not done changing at the age of 18, even though it is done "growing" by that point. There is much less research about this topic available. Thus it is not worthless and is adding to the body of knowledge.

      As a side note, the article does not really mean "maturity" in terms of behavior (colloquial usage). The study is talking about "maturity" in terms of physical development of the brain.

    5. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by chub_mackerel · · Score: 1
      No, it's not semantics. The human brain does not "mature", that is, cease it's major developments, until certain times in life...

      Well, if it's not semantics, then why do you need to clarify what you mean by "mature" right off the bat?

      I suppose next you'll want to be saying which developments you're referring to, and why you don't include others (like changes associated with menopause or aging). Or which ones are "major" and which aren't.

      I guess it'll be easier for me to redefine "semantics" instead... ;)

    6. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by 01dbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How exactly is this worthless?

      And more to the point, did you actually RTFA? Because the researchers DON'T use the word maturity; the Dartmouth Public Affairs office uses the word maturity. The researchers conclude that significant anatomical changes occur in the brain long after an age that's generally -- and legally -- accepted as "adulthood." This is an important conclusion, because it tells us something about how encountering new and more challenging circumstances has a significant and measurable effect on brain development. That's especially important knowledge, because it has implications for how we go about teaching young adults, whether its college instruction or training young soldiers or whatever.

      The conclusions of the study -- and their potential benefits in practical circumstances -- hold regardless of any arbitrary definition of maturity.

    7. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by Surt · · Score: 1

      Well, without being able to read the detailed research:

      They measured brain changes taking place in younger students but not older students. Their research is about physical brain maturity (the cessation of major brain developmental changes) and not about 'maturity' as the common public would understand the term. It is, however, related to that notion of maturity in the sense of asking this question: do you hold someone with a not-yet-fully developed brain fully responsible for their actions? We generally as a society have agreed that we do not hold two year old children responsible for their actions. By 8 years of age the societal disagreement is fuzzy, and at 18 it is concretely the other way. This research suggests that perhaps the age of full responsibility needs to be raised to 25.

      Anyway, the point of my post is that there is basically no subjectivity in this research. It's about physical maturity, which has a rigorous definition.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    8. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      The research is not worthless. The real point is that the brain was changing.

            Which makes it worthless. Newsflash: brain matures as you age.

            Your argument is a non sequitur. The fact that we know different areas of the brain are specialized for different functions has no relation to this study.

            Plus this study is completely biased as they only analyzed "students", which are not necessarily representative of the population in general. The also didn't have a negative control group. This means the only place they could get it published is the internet, oh, and slashdot, apparently.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    9. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by Art+Tatum · · Score: 1

      What I wonder, though, is how "self-fulfilling" this is. If we don't allow people to drink, smoke, have sex, drive a car, vote, or fight in a war until age x, isn't it possible that age x is when these new experiences and events in the environment spur brain development? I'd say that's very likely considering the evidence from past times when all those things happened earlier in life and produced responsible adults much more quickly than today.

    10. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with aging happening much faster (puberty often happens under 10, type 2 diabetes is happening in children) today than ever before, perhaps we should lower the age minimums in society - manytimes people are physiologically old and broken down while still legally underage. Even if not, there are much less good years, 21-29 (or 25-29 - 25 is the age at which car rentals and car insurance becomes reasonably affordable) is about it.

      You aren't allowed to serve in the US Senate until 30, and by then you are already old and broken.

    11. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by jonhainer · · Score: 1

      This research is not at all worthless. As others have pointed out, the group is not studying human responses, they are studying actual physical and chemical changes that are taking place in the brain. All bones, tissues and organs change rapidly at different points during childhood and adolescence. Frequently these changes are affected greatly by outside stimulus.

      By studying the normal function under different stimuli, you lay the groundwork for studying abnormal cases in the future. It could turn out that the changes recorded here will alert us to growth deficiencies that may be associated with neurological disorders such as autism. We may find that certain processes of the brain that are stimulated and developed at this stage of life that, if they could be replicated later, could counteract degenerative diseases like Alzheimer's.

      Understanding the phyical processes of our bodies we work and grow is rarely useless.

    12. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by E++99 · · Score: 1
      It is rash to condemn where you are ignorant.
      -Seneca
      Quick summary for the ignorant: This is research comparing the measurable anotomical differences between the brains of statistically meaningful samples of 18-year-olds versus 25-35-year-olds, also tracking the anatomical changes in the brains in the former group over the course of a year.
    13. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by yusing · · Score: 1


      Worthless research. What constitutes maturity is not exactly well defined;...

      For starters, it's when you don't blame the researchers for an immature link to a shitty article.

      --

      "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

    14. Re:The problem isn't measuring, it's defining by Peeteriz · · Score: 1

      I feel that whatever you set that age, the ability to behave responsibly will come only some time after you get the responsibility and ability to learn from your mistakes.
          If you are 'shielded' from much responsibility and also prevented from 'risky' things until the age of X, then I'd bet 1 to 100 that at age of X or X+1 you won't be a responsible, mature person, regardless if X is 12 or 52.

  10. drugs and alchol? by millahtime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have also read, but I can't remember where and it's to friggin early for me to take the time to look it up, that drugs and alchol (certain amounts like a lot) can affect the brains development as an organ keeping it in the state of a younger brain.

    This could be, and I think the study even said so, one of the reasons drunks and drug addicts act so immature if they have been doing it for a long time or started when they were kids.

    I wonder if the study took enviormental factors such as this into account in the study.

    1. Re:drugs and alchol? by ab762 · · Score: 1

      They also impact your ability to spell, it seems.

    2. Re:drugs and alchol? by tvlinux · · Score: 1

      Alcohol and drugs can effect the physical makeup of the brain. On the other foot, when your 50 it is great to feel like a kid:)

    3. Re:drugs and alchol? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I have also read, but I can't remember where and it's to friggin early for me to take the time to look it up, that drugs and alchol (certain amounts like a lot) can affect the brains development as an organ keeping it in the state of a younger brain.

      This could be, and I think the study even said so, one of the reasons drunks and drug addicts act so immature if they have been doing it for a long time or started when they were kids.

      I wonder if the study took enviormental factors such as this into account in the study.


      Welcome to the science of human psychology. Err, the study of the college freshman :)

      Psych is a very difficult field, especially with humans. Control, interperson and intraperson variability, operational definitions, tests and measurements, you name it. Psych science is almost impossible to do do, especially with complex social organisms like humans.

      Regarding drugs and alcohol (what is the difference???), I've heard that emotional maturity stops when the abuse begins. To some degree, I would agree with this. A majority of the reasoning behind this is the cultural stigma against substance abuse, and the constant hiding of the usage via lies, hiding, going into "subcultures", and whatnot can certainly hinder emotional development. Basically, its very common for substance abusers to be "full of shit", and they cannot mature when they cannot differentiate from reality and fiction. It hinders normal learning and social interactions. Personally, I believe its more of society's irrational beliefs about altered states of consciousness that create such a problem, than the altered state in itself. But again, psych research on humans is almost impossible.

      Regarding maturity in general. I have no clue. Some it depends on the individual and their environment, especially their family. Personally, I would guess that only 20-50% of males mature by their mid to late 20s if ever. At least here in the USA. American young males are the focus of about everything, and its common for them to get this "confidence in their ignorance" attitude. Hey, I knew everything when I was 23-27, didn't you?

      Its pretty much common knowledge that females mature faster than males, and that makes sense (disclaimer, I believe there is a difference between the sexes, which is taboo here). Females have to mature, because they are basically potential walking baby factories from about 13-14 years old on. Diet has decreased the age of female puberty to a fairly low age, and biologically they realize that they are potentially responsible for raising another human being for many years, and they usually take this pretty seriously. On average, women have about 1/2 or less sexual partners than males Yes, whores/sluts do exist to skew this number because the men have to have sex with someone right? But even those kinda girls are still responsible enough to prevent pregnancy.

      I don't know when a human is "mature". There does seem to be an age when most humans basically stop progressing and become docile or merely creatures of habit, and eventually infantlike in many ways towards the end of their life.

      Yes, I have studied psych, have been employed in psych hospitals, including drug and alcohol ones. Yes, I'm a drunk too, but I believe I'm pretty mature, but who knows?

  11. Age by Elitist_Phoenix · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here is a link to and science program in Australia called Catalyst. I actually managed to watch this episode and this reminded me of it and I was bored enough to google for a link.

    What it says is that the brain doesnt mature fully until the age of 25.

    http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s1424747.ht m

    --
    "I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google"
    1. Re:Age by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      Oh great. Another excuse to raise the drinking age. When are the legislatures going to learn that it's experience that matures people. It's not set to some cosmological timer.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    2. Re:Age by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd say when someone can die for their country, they can drink alcohol. But y'know, that's just crazy old me.

    3. Re:Age by Elitist_Phoenix · · Score: 1

      And its pretty stupid having the ability to drive and the ability to drink kick in on the same day.

      --
      "I'm going to f***ing bury that guy, I have done it before, and I will do it again. I'm going to f***ing kill Google"
    4. Re:Age by hey! · · Score: 1

      Oh great. Another excuse to raise the drinking age

      Age has it's compensations. Granted the compensations of age (money, pulling rank on young 'uns and telling 'em what they can and cannot do) suck next to the compensations of youth (sex,drugs, offensive music), but there you have it.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    5. Re:Age by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

      "When are the legislatures going to learn that it's experience that matures people."

      Because it's not. If that were so, people would learn from their mistakes. There are too many immature people who have arm-length DUI records and too many immature programmers who continue to perform badly with their team-mates for this to be true. People don't learn from experience if their brains aren't ready to. QED.

    6. Re:Age by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      So your saying that if these people had been locked in daycare until they were 25, they'd be any more mature? I hate to pull nature vs nurture in, but troubled people generally get their habits from inside the home. Making it more difficult to get away from a bad environment will only make matters worse. Acting on this study would keep young adults from fully attaining independance for a much longer time.

      Face it: by 25, you've missed your youth. All that's left is to raise your family, start your career, or resign yourself to obscurity.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
  12. Areas of further study? by Teiresias_UK · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder what the effect of beer is on maturity and these areas of the brain known to integrate emotion and cognition?

    I know after 12 pints I often lose the ability to speak, start dribbling, and crawl around on the floor like a 2 year old ...

    1. Re:Areas of further study? by CmdrGravy · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's tragic ! After 12 pints I become extremely chatty, witty and insightful, gain the ability to dance like a sex god and become immeasurably more attractive to the ladies. I think, I rarely have any clear memories to back this up absolutely.

    2. Re:Areas of further study? by fritz1968 · · Score: 1

      Are you a Frat boy? Let me guess... the first thing you do in the morning is walk home? No no, wait, wait! The first thing you do is introduce yourself... theeeeen you walk home.

      --
      It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.
    3. Re:Areas of further study? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After 12 pints I become bullet-proof!

    4. Re:Areas of further study? by yusing · · Score: 1


      After 12 pints I become extremely chatty, witty and insightful, gain the ability to dance like a sex god and ...

      DAMN! No wonder I have a problem, I always gave up after 8 pints !!

      --

      "You must try to forget all you have learned. You must begin to dream." -- Sherwood Anderson

  13. Obligatory Dave Barry quote (was Re:Bullshit study by shreevatsa · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What I look forward to is continued immaturity followed by death."

  14. contorl group by koekepeer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (read with tongue in cheeck)

    so ehm... they take a bunch of older students as the control group. is that a smart idea? i'd take a bunch of people already working for a while, who have been confronted with Real Life (tm) and have developed into Maturity

    1. Re:contorl group by JustAnotherBob · · Score: 1

      But the entire point was testing if people moving out of the house, and going to college make freshman(the brain) undergo these changes, by keeping similar variables between the two test groups they have a greater degree of certainty that the data will be compatable between them.

    2. Re:contorl group by koekepeer · · Score: 1

      ... which teaches me to not knee-jerk respond and rtfa carefully. thanks

  15. Use it or lose it? by l0rd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if someone who doesn't move out before a certain age won't have certain brain development, just as someone who hasn't learnt to talk will never talk after a certain age.

    In other words, do the experiences of moving out change you or does the brain change naturally?

    Also are the effects of alchol and drugs on brain development also taken into account, seeing as these are college freshmen ;)

    1. Re:Use it or lose it? by museumpeace · · Score: 2, Informative

      yup. The conclusions at the end of the paper [I can see the Wiley Interscience via my library site license] implies that the changes in brain activity they measured are the result of both nature and nurture...the old debate can rage on.

      --
      SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    2. Re:Use it or lose it? by l0rd · · Score: 1

      It would have been interesting if they put a few mamm's boys in the test too so they can see the difference.

      Of course the changes in the brain can be due to any number of things (alchol, regular sex etc. etc.).

  16. They don't say how we prevent it! by Madman · · Score: 1

    Never gonna grow up

  17. Simle Answer by joel8x · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Once you stop drinking like a fish, you start to mature. People who keep hardcore drinking after their college-era stay at ~18 years old in their maturity.

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
    1. Re:Simle Answer by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Once you stop drinking like a fish, you start to mature. People who keep hardcore drinking after their college-era stay at ~18 years old in their maturity.

      Of course. Alcohol's a preservative. Think "Pickled BrainZ".

      I disagree about them staying ~18 in their level of maturity, though - it seems that, as time goes on, they act less and less mature, until they're acting just like a baby - spitting up their food, drooling, puking wherever they want, and pissing themselves. How they think this constitutes a "good time" is beyond me. Maybe what's needed is a study in booze and masochism.

    2. Re:Simle Answer by Nephroth · · Score: 1

      There have actually been some interesting studies done that show a possible (mind you, only possible, not direct) link between the development of various brain disorders later in life and excessive drinking, especially in 18-21 year old males. It seems that flooding your brain with the "happiest hydrocarbon" while it's in the middle of a major restructuring can result in some defects. In what is perhaps the greatest irony of it all, the years that are most dangerous for people to drink heavily are the ones that the desire to drink heavily is the greatest. Fear not, if you've gotten slobberingly drunk a few times, I'm pretty doubtful that you've permanently damaged your brain. But those of you whose weekends are hazy clouds of intoxication... you might want to think about a little moderation.

      --
      Our greatest enemy is neither a single man, nor is it a nation, it is, as it has always been, our own greed.
  18. Re:Amazing by aussie_a · · Score: 1

    Had I known sooner, I would have taken up smoking pot a long time ago.

  19. Think about why car insurance gets cheaper at 35 by aegilops · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There has to be a statistical reason why your car insurance is so absurdly high when you're a late teen, with a steady decrease before a significant reduction at the age of 35. Certainly your appetite for risk behind the wheel doesn't completely reflect your all round maturity in life, but I'd suggest a strong correlation.

    Aegilops

  20. depends on your definition of maturity by themysteryman73 · · Score: 1, Interesting
    I think that it depends on your definition of maturity. Saying that the brain takes 25 years to fully mature is basically saying that after 25 years, you've finished aging mentally. I'd say that using this information to say that someone who's 25 is definitely more mature than someone who is 18 is an immature view in itself.

    That's not to say, of course, that 25 year olds are not often more mature than 18 year olds. At the same time, the mere physical age of ones brain is not the only factor to take into consideration when evaluating someones maturity. Environmental factors, for example, make up a big part of any one persons maturity level, or personality in general.

    But what am I saying? We all know that every single 18 year old, without exception, is an immature, boozing, sex-addict. :P

    1. Re:depends on your definition of maturity by crimson30 · · Score: 1

      But what am I saying? We all know that every single 18 year old, without exception, is an immature, boozing, sex-addict. :P

      While your statement is likely tongue in cheek, I just wanted to point out that when I was 18, I was digusted with such types (my peers).

      Incidentally, I haven't matured all that much since, and I'm 29 now... and I still find people in my age bracket that I find to be irresponsible idiots with poor impulse control.

    2. Re:depends on your definition of maturity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you must be a really fun guy to hang out with.

    3. Re:depends on your definition of maturity by themysteryman73 · · Score: 0

      Yep, it was a joke. I also know plenty of people who were quite mature and responsible when they were eighteen...

  21. Control group? by nordelius · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Maybe I'm missing something, but wouldn't a suitable control group comprise 18 year olds who didn't go to college? As the experiment stands, you could argue either that:

    a) going to college changes your brain
    b) being 18 and full of hormones changes your brain
    c) both to varying extents

    --
    -- "You never mentioned comets before, Mac. This opens up a whole new area of negotiation." - Gordon Urquart
    1. Re:Control group? by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Seconded.

      This an experiment which has only a positive control group. There is no negative control group which means that this is not a scientific observation but a boatload of blah blah blah.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    2. Re:Control group? by Surt · · Score: 1

      The control group of older students suggests that college alone doesn't change your brain. It could still be the case that college + young changes your brain, but that doesn't really hurt the maturity claim.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Control group? by the+idoru · · Score: 1

      In my opinion, many psychoolgy experiments suffer from sampling problems like this. Many have experimental groups consisting almost entirely of undergraduate students--a group that is hardly demographically similar to the population as a whole. I have no doubt that the group of 25-35 year olds consisted of a bunch of graduate students and post-docs who were acquainted with the experimenters. I think we can all agree that anyone who is a graduate student is probably not representative of the average 25-35 year old, at least in education level.

      So, you have one group of Dartmouth undergraduates (non-representative of all 18 year olds) being compared to one group of slightly older Dartmouth graduate students (again, non-representative of their age group). How powerful is that comparison when addressing the overall question of maturity, and especially when comparing to the human population as a whole?

  22. I speculate around 175 by smchris · · Score: 1


    Or as they say, "Too soon old, too late smart".

    One of the best reasons for life extension.

    1. Re:I speculate around 175 by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1
      Or as they say, "Too soon old, too late smart".

      One of the best reasons for life extension.

      I don't know, I kind of agree with Ivanova in Babylon 5.

      Ivanova: It wouldn't matter. Even if we lived two hundred years, we'd still be human. We'd still make the same mistakes.
      Franklin: You're a pessimist.
      Ivanova: I'm Russian, doctor. We understand these things.

    2. Re:I speculate around 175 by baadger · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, you're only mature when you're old enough for Ultra Porn.

  23. Agreed. by deep44 · · Score: 0

    Additionally, they only studied the brains of other college students. What about the brain of the person who skipped college because the pace is too slow and the culture is counter-productive? What about the brains of the people who are making more money (annually) at age 16 than most college graduates make before their 40th birthday?

    I conclude that the brains of the people described above are much different than that of a regular college student's brain. Now, can I have a grant, too?

  24. Responsibility by jpopper · · Score: 1

    College is for having fun and acting the eejit and generally screwing around. When you leave college/university then the reality of finding a job and having to support yourself and get on with the sobering thought of getting a career sets in, then you start to mature.

    1. Re:Responsibility by Nephroth · · Score: 1

      For you, perhaps. Some of us have had to support ourselves while attending school. To us, "generally screwing around" sounds pretty foolish.

      --
      Our greatest enemy is neither a single man, nor is it a nation, it is, as it has always been, our own greed.
  25. Re:Think about why car insurance gets cheaper at 3 by A+Bugg · · Score: 1

    It's 25 not 35 when car insurance dramatically decreases.

  26. If only that were true. by raehl · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We all know that every single 18 year old, without exception, is an immature, boozing, sex-addict.

    I've encountered more immature 18 year olds who are straight-edge sexaphobics than boozing sexaholics. There is a whole segment of our society devoted to making sure children are shielded from any sort of adult social behavior until at least after they graduate college. Are they safe until they finish college? I suppose. Are they prey after that? You betcha.

    1. Re:If only that were true. by Hershmire · · Score: 1

      I'd mod this up if I had the points.

      I completely agree. The trend toward sheltering our children is causing way more harm then good. Don't believe me? Google search for "boomerang generation." We're creating a generation of kids unable to cope with the realities of life and therefore decided to never grow up/leave the house. Just ask my puritanical 27-year-old sister who has yet to get a full-time job and leave the nest.

      I'm not saying smoke crack around your kid and beat him regularly. The key is finding a balance between care and dissappointment. And, Christ, say "No" once in awhile. There'd be a lot fewer problems in the world otherwise.

      --
      if(!toilet_paper) roll.replace(new roll); //Stupid roommates.
  27. The problem with this post by museumpeace · · Score: 5, Informative
    is that NONE of us can RTFA. All that is posted here is the write-up by a Dartmouth PR person. The link to the journal article hits a roadblock unless you can toss it a Wiley Interscience license cookie...you may be lucky enough to be near a university library..you probably aren't. When I submitted this to the Agonist.org yesterday, I had such access. The paper is long, spends 2/3 of its pages clarifying and justifying its particular use of the somewhat controversialVBM technique and otherwise qualifying its results. The authors are fairly up front about distancing their work from claiming a universal result...how "average" could your findings be based only on 19 Dartmouth freshmen. [did they control for alcohol use?].

    Even with all the disclaimers, they had two supportable contentions:
    1. whatever change it is,[myelination was their pick] higly localized changes in brain areas that integrate emotion and decision ARE changeing.
    2. their data do little to pick apart the nature vs nurture issues that may rule such changes...only supporting the conclusion that at 18 something is still rewiring your brain.
    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.
    1. Re:The problem with this post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Research Article
      Anatomical changes in the emerging adult brain: A voxel-based morphometry study
      Craig M. Bennett 1 *, Abigail A. Baird 1 2
      1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Moore Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
      2Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Moore Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
      email: Craig M. Bennett (craig.bennett@dartmouth.edu)

      *Correspondence to Craig M. Bennett, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Moore Hall, Hanover, NH 03755

      Funded by:
      NICHD; Grant Number: R03 HD45742-01A1

      Keywords
      magnetic resonance imaging voxel-based morphometry human development

      Abstract
      Abstract INTRODUCTION SUBJECTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Acknowledgements References
      Research has consistently confirmed changes occur in brain morphometry between adolescence and adulthood. The purpose of the present study was to explore anatomical change during a specific environmental transition. High-resolution T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were acquired from 19 participants (mean age at initial scan = 18.6 years) during their freshman year. Scans were completed during the fall term and 6 months later before the conclusion of the school year. Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess within-subject change. Significant intensity increases were observed along the right midcingulate, inferior anterior cingulate gyrus, right caudate head, right posterior insula, and bilateral claustrum. Regional changes were not observed in two control groups; one controlling for method and another controlling for age-specific change over time. The results suggest that significant age-related changes in brain structure continue after the age of 18 and may represent dynamic changes related to new environmental challenges. Findings from the regions of change are discussed in the context of specific environmental demands during a period of normative maturation. Hum Brain Mapp, 2005. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
      Received: 2 March 2005; Accepted: 13 September 2005

      Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

      10.1002/hbm.20218 About DOI

      Article Text

      INTRODUCTION
      Abstract INTRODUCTION SUBJECTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Acknowledgements References

      The transition from adolescence to adulthood is known to be a time of tremendous change. Between the ages of 18 and 25, most young adults move away from their parents or guardians and become self supported for the first time [Cohen et al., [2003]]. Marked shifts in the romantic relationships, risk-taking behavior, insight, and worldviews of young adults have been well documented during this time [Arnett, [2000]]. Such research has demonstrated convincingly that a person continues to mature behaviorally between the ages of 18 and 25; however, changes in brain structure accompanying this period of development have remained unclear. A thorough understanding of the structural and functional changes occurring in the brain during young adulthood is critical to advancing our knowledge of the neural basis of cognitive, social, and emotional development.

      Postmortem studies were the first to reveal that development in the central nervous system begins during gestation and continues well into the third decade of life [Benes et al., [1994]; Brody et al., [1987]; Hunter et al., [1997]; Yakovlev and Lecours, [1967]]. These findings have been supported by work using positron emission tomography (PET), which can provide regional measures of baseline glucose metabolism. Using this method, cortical metabolic activity across the brain has been shown to reach stable, adult-like, levels in the mid-twenties [Van Bogaert et al., [1998]]. More recently, studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have confirmed that brain maturation continues throughout adolescence and into young adulthood. Specifically, white matter volume increases linearly and continues to increase into midlife [Bartzoki

    2. Re:The problem with this post by AlterTick · · Score: 1
      Try here:

      http://www.theteenbrain.com/about/publications/pdf s/2005-Bennett-VBM.pdf

      Posted elsewhere in the discussion here by one of the authors. Just spreading it around.

      --
      Conclusion: the Empire squashes the Federation like a bug. Accept it.
    3. Re:The problem with this post by demetrius-k · · Score: 1
      > 2. their data do little to pick apart the nature vs nurture issues that may rule such changes...only supporting the conclusion that at 18 something is still rewiring your brain.

      No one doubts that your brain goes through changes as you grow up. The nature vs. nurture question is whether this *has* to happen at a fixed age such as 18, or is it a function of how you are brought up.

      Example: In Quebec the drinking age is a loosely enforced 18. Consequence: most people that age are much more grown up about their alcoholic consumption.

    4. Re:The problem with this post by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      The paper is long, spends 2/3 of its pages clarifying and justifying its particular use of the somewhat controversial VBM technique and otherwise qualifying its results.

      Personally, I don't feel that Visual Basic Macro techniques have ANY place in the realm of Science...

  28. There's no age for maturity.... by catdogven · · Score: 0

    Maturity is not something you get....it's something you develop during your whole life. There's no age for being mature...and i think there will never be. There's an age when you become responsable for your actions (18, 16 depends on the country) but you can still be a very inmature person at that age. Like they say in my country...the devil knows more coz he's old than coz he's the devil....

    --
    It's never too late to stop doing something wrong, or to start doing something right.
  29. Not always. Case in point..... by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    .....Our current President went to one of the finest institutes of higher "edumacation" on the planet. They couldn't help him.

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  30. ...and what is maturity exactly? by master_p · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've seen 20 year olds to drive carelessly, doing various wheelies and other tricks on the road, while at the same time many 40 year olds drive very carefully, respecting road signs etc.

    Then again I have seen those 20 year olds voting for those politicians that really care about the environment and the world's state, while those 40 year olds voted for their 'connection' that promised them a better job, a bigger loan, more money, etc.

    So who is mature after all?

    1. Re:...and what is maturity exactly? by leereyno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You see 20 year olds voting for those politicians who CLAIM to care really care about the environment and the world's state. In other words those 20 year olds were young enough to be had.

      The only thing that a politician cares about is power. A firm pre-requisite for power is staying in office and that means votes. There is a reason why writing your senator or congressman makes a difference, and why they're VERY, VERY interested in whether you're a registered voter when you do. It is why they employ teams of statisticians to crunch the NES data to help them determine how many voters they have to keep happy back home in order to stay in office. Politicians are very principled, and the primary principle they believe in is fooling enough of the people enough of the time to maintain their position.

      By the way, who am I supposed to vote for to get a better job, a bigger loan, or more money? The only person who can get those things for you is yourself. Anyone who thinks a politician is going to hand it to them is a bigger fool than the 20 year olds you mentioned.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    2. Re:...and what is maturity exactly? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Voting for Howard Dean is the political equivalent of doing wheelies on the road.

      I will guess that you don't know that because you aren't mature.

      And you get +4 insightful because many slashdot modders also aren't mature.

      Congratulations on figuring out that doing tricks on the road is foolish.

      You may apply for membership in the mature club when you figure out that leftism is even more foolish and gets a lot more people killed.

    3. Re:...and what is maturity exactly? by sac13 · · Score: 1

      Then again I have seen those 20 year olds voting for those politicians that really care about the environment and the world's state, while those 40 year olds voted for their 'connection' that promised them a better job, a bigger loan, more money, etc.

      Don't confuse the idealistic nature of the 20 year old for maturity. In fact, you can chalk that up to immaturity. The 40 year old is looking out for himself, sure. However, that's not a matter of immaturity. Mr. 40 year old is being pragmatic. Despite what many people would wish, the environmental movement is dead. How many of these politicians the 20 year old is voting for are winning (at least in the US where I am)? The fact is, the entire system is made up of people giving each other hand jobs or some equivalent. Everybody has their hand in the pie and no one is going to give up their piece.

  31. Define It Fool by aplusjimages · · Score: 3, Funny

    How do you define or measure maturaty for a study? Is it when you stop laughing when someone farts or says penis? Penis.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  32. What the study was really about: by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    Brains....
    Brains....

    How else would someone GIVE them brains, except to "study"

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
    1. Re:What the study was really about: by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      How else would someone GIVE them brains, except to "study"

      Braaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii innnnnnnnnnnnsssssss - mfffff munch mmmmm chmmm ummm

      Dunbal points out the other use for brains...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  33. It's True by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    I myself expierienced this after moving on to third level education. I can't exactly describe why now, but at the time, about six months after starting university, I was keenly aware that my mind had "changed" somehow. I was viewing the world very differently. I put this down as a consequence of moving from an enviornment where permission had to be given in order to urinate, to a place where no one really cared whether I turned up for class or not.

    This occurred again after I moved out of the barent's basement, but in a subtly different way. Suddenly I began to view the opposite sex in a whole new way.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  34. Maturity by Britz · · Score: 1

    In some ways I was very mature early on. In other ways I was a "late bloomer". Guess in which.

  35. Right about ... by MaxUK · · Score: 1

    when impotence sets in.

  36. I think I must be a slow developer by Anthony · · Score: 1

    I don't think I felt 'grown up' until I hit 42. Living a peaceful existence with low physical and emotional stress compared to hunter gatherers, farmers, soldiers etc may have something to do with it.

    --
    Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  37. Re:Think about why car insurance gets cheaper at 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It tends to coincide with marriage which also pushes the price down. It's 25, by the way, as another poster pointed out.

  38. IT's an old saying but true as the hills by Ogemaniac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you vote Republican before you are 20, you have no heart. If you vote Democrat after you are 20, you have no brain.

    All you are noting is that many people, somewhere along the line, realize that idealism doesn't actually work.

    1. Re:IT's an old saying but true as the hills by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      If you vote Republican before you are 20, you have no heart. If you vote Democrat after you are 20, you have no brain.

      Thanks for Bush, asshat.

      He's doing a heck of a job.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    2. Re:IT's an old saying but true as the hills by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Actually, I like the line: A Conservative is a Liberal who got mugged.

    3. Re:IT's an old saying but true as the hills by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I like the pair:

            A conservative is a liberal who's been mugged.
            A liberal is a conservative who's been arrested.

      Gives you a better perspective on a black-and-white world.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    4. Re:IT's an old saying but true as the hills by DrCode · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can work the other way too. You can be conservative when you're young because you think your destiny is in your own hands, and that people who fail are lazy and/or stupid. As you get older, your realize that much of our success is luck and that it makes sense for us to have the government help out those who are less fortunate.

    5. Re:IT's an old saying but true as the hills by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      Here's another good one:

      "As people do better, they start voting like Republicans...unless they have too much education and vote Democratic, which proves there can be too much of a good thing." - Karl Rove

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
  39. Maybe I'm Just Optimistic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but for most Slashdot readers, I have to think "any day now."

  40. I don't wanna grow up. . . by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    I'm a Toys R' Us kid.
    A million toys to choose from, that I can play with.
    From bikes to trikes and video games, its the biggest toy store there is. GEE WIZ! I don't wanna grow up, cuz baby if I did....I wouldn't be a Toys R' Us kid!

    *Sorry, couldn't help myself. Whenever someone tells me to grow up that song kicks in*

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:I don't wanna grow up. . . by el+cuco · · Score: 1

      thats awesome.. same here.. that song kicks in when someone tells me to act my age. I'm 30 and have a 1 month old newborn. I can wait for him to get older so we can hit up Toys R us!

  41. Re:It depends... Bull$hit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's ALL in the brain chemistry.

    Chemical dependency studies point out that use of drugs and alcohol impede the maturation process. That shows us that brain chemistry is important. Look at the reproductive cycle for more on brain chemistry. Look at how stupid many young males act to "get the girl." Look at how stupid many young females act to "get the guy". The answer? It varies. And it will vary for some all the way into their late 20's.

  42. Re:Think about why car insurance gets cheaper at 3 by 2old2rockNroll · · Score: 1

    My auto insurance premium had a significant decrease at 35. Of course my health insurance premiums increased, but there are always tradeoffs.

  43. Next Research Topic . . . by Dausha · · Score: 1

    Maturity is really a process, not a destination. I know some pretty rash, immature seniors (i.e. 60+) and some very level-headed tweens (i.e., 20-30). After they figure out when maturity sets in, I believe we should find out how green is green and how far is up. Then we'll be getting somewhere.

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  44. Just before death, I hope! by ab762 · · Score: 1

    Or a little after, maybe.

  45. Free Cluestick by Caspian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The entire point of the study is meaningless. It's like asking "how much does it cost to buy a house?" Well, some houses are $100,000, some are $1,000,000, some are $10,000,000... Asking "at what age does maturity set in" is the same.

    We don't ask "how light does your skin have to be for you to be a genius", since everyone recognizes that prejudging intelligence by skin color is wrong. Why do we persist in asking "how many years old do you have to be for you to be treated as a mature human being"?

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  46. Still tragic by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 3, Funny

    After 12 pints I am invisible - and Superman !

  47. I am the first author by benntop · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is good to see a lot of thoughtful comments here regarding the paper.

    If you have any questions for me specifically then please reply to this post and I will try to answer as directly as I can.

    Best,
    ~Craig

    1. Re:I am the first author by benntop · · Score: 5, Informative

      The linked Slashdot article is just the College Relations department press release. You can look at the full prepress PDF at the following address:

      http://www.theteenbrain.com/about/publications/pdf s/2005-Bennett-VBM.pdf

    2. Re:I am the first author by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      The press release was too fluffy, but the full article was a little too complex.

      I guess my first question is, isn't a sample and control of around 20 people a little small? Especially since they are all coming from basically the same background?

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    3. Re:I am the first author by benntop · · Score: 3, Informative

      You couldn't be more correct about the press release.

      The sample size of ~20 is small when compared to many other studies. Oddly enough though, it is above average for many MRI and fMRI experiments. Several of the studies we built off of have even smaller sample sizes. Gogtay et al., 2004*, a very good paper, had a sample size of 13! This doesn't justify the low number, but does give you an idea regarding normal study sizes.

      We had wanted to end up with usuable data for 40 subjects. We scanned 50 subjects for our time1 acquisition, which we thought would be plenty to keep our numbers high after our time2 scan. In the end subject dropout, scanner breakdowns, and just plain old bad data conspired to limit the sample to 19.

      * Gogtay, N. et al. Dynamic mapping of human cortical development during childhood through early adulthood. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 8174-9 (2004).

    4. Re:I am the first author by collin66 · · Score: 1
      Reading the summary (even just the Dartmouth PR) brought to mind constraint-induced therapy and some cognitive therapies for OCD, the latter of which were investigated using PET. I just recently read about these in The Mind and the Brain by Schwartz & Begley.

      I wonder how you would compare the nature & scale of the neurological changes you observed vs the changes associated with CIT and the cognitive OCD treatments?
      thanks...

    5. Re:I am the first author by benntop · · Score: 1

      The Schwartz et al.* paper investigating functional changes in the brain arising from the use of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is a classic, so I can imagine that his book would be quite good.

      In the last 15 years there have been a number of similar studies looking at CBT effects in OCD and other disorders, such as phobias. The results of all of these studies underscore the idea that the brain is in a constant state of change. The way your brain operates today will not be entirely similar to how it operates a year from now, or a decade from now. The especially cool part? Research shows that you can play some part in shaping that change. It gives a whole new definition to "meta-cognition".

      The nature our results varies somewhat from the above-mentioned effects. We believe that the changes observed in our study are due to both normal development and environmental provocation. While the brain is plastic to a degree throughout the lifetime, it is most plastic and malleable while it is still developing. What our results indicate is that this development, and consequent increased malleability, continues well past the age of 18.

      * Schwartz et al 1996. J.M. Schwartz, P.W. Stoessel, L.R. Baxter, K.M. Martin and M.E. Phelps , Systematic changes in cerebral glucose metabolic rate after successful behavior modification treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 53 (1996), pp. 109-113.

    6. Re:I am the first author by ravenfrank · · Score: 1

      Craig, It would be interesting to do a similar study on subjects who were thrust into an "adult" world much earlier than age 18 - many teenagers (myself included long ago)and indeed pre-teenagers have to enter the workforce to either support their families or at the very least, begin to have some savings or spending money. I had to develop rapport with co-workers and supervisors much older than me at age 13, and I'm sure it had an impact on what is now my view of "maturity" and how I interact with other human beings. Great work, BTW! Frank Boyle Washington, DC

    7. Re:I am the first author by benntop · · Score: 1

      You know, the idea of investigating a younger group of people with adult-level responsibilities is the number one suggestion we have gotten since the press release went out. Many have cited the exact situation you describe - moving to the workforce or having other adult responsibilities as a teen. One individual who wrote to us cited historical cases, such as Alexander the Great, Napoleon, Constantine, Cleopatra, Marc Anthony, and Julius Caesar, as other prime examples of people who had great environmental demands placed on them early on.

      You have a very astute observation that just because a brain is still maturing doesn't mean that the behavior of an individual will be immature. Speaking in general, the brain has a remarkable ability to rise to the challenges placed before it. Still, we don't have a firm grasp on what effect such challenges have on the developing brain. More work is needed.

      As it stands we are continuing to follow the participants who were scanned as part of the Human Brain Mapping paper. They are all juniors now and will be graduating in a little over a year! We are also looking at beginning anew with a fresh group of high school seniors who have different aspirations after graduating. We want to bring folks in who are going to college, heading to the workforce, going to tech school, going into the military, or just staying at home and living with mom and dad. In short, we want to determine if having environmental challenges play any role in ongoing brain maturation.

      I appreciate your comment Frank. Good to hear from you!

      ~Craig

  48. Cinema Display? by broohaha · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oooh. Isn't that a 30" Cinema Display featured in the picture of the two researchers?

    1. Re:Cinema Display? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're so immature

  49. Re:It depends... Bull$hit! by LeonGeeste · · Score: 0

    I'm glad someone finally mentioned men and women. That seems to be the most important part of this study -- about emotional and cognitional areas of the brain changing. It seems to me that the average (or median) 16-year-old male is more emotionally mature than the average (or median) 30-year-old female because they can better set aside emotion and think rationally.

    --
    Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
  50. Not an exact science by HangingChad · · Score: 1
    One could argue that maturity takes a certain combination of experience and physical changes that come together at different times for individuals. I'd argue there is no fixed point of defined maturity, but an ongoing process that manifests itself more as time goes on.

    Isn't that right, Mr. Poopy Pants? NEENER! NEENER! NEENER! Your theory sucks!!! Loooooooser.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
  51. "Growing Up" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As was explained to me a long time ago...

    At about the age of 12 or 13, the Puberty Fairy comes along one night and takes away your brain. Sometime later, as soon as 18, she might come back and give you a grown-up version of your brain. It seems to happen a little earlier for girls. Sometimes she completely forgets to return your brain (hence, "I may have to grow older, but I don't have to grow up.")

  52. It's the environment by Hasai · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    From my own personal experiences, I think it's strictly environment.

    I base this on the fact that I've met many people well-into middle-age (mostly in the US and Europe) with all the emotional maturity of the typical toddler. I've also met Third World kids, many of whom were 'older' than I ever want to be.
    :(

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

  53. When does maturity set in? by SpasticWeasel · · Score: 1

    Still waiting at 39 years, 10 mos, 2 days.

    --
    No sooner do I get over one, then you put a better one right next to me. Bastards.
  54. If you've signed up to die, you can by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    Enlisted servicemen can drink at 18 when on base. Some pubs will look the other way for them, as well. Depends on the bar, though.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
    1. Re:If you've signed up to die, you can by Daniel+Wood · · Score: 1

      That only applies to certain bases.

      Bases close to the Mexican border, for example. They do that because they know that if they don't, the younger soldiers will go across the border to drink.

      If I'm wrong, well, I missed out on three years of drinking, damnit. (I'm 22 now).

  55. Maturity is like getting run over by a bus by spindleguy · · Score: 2, Funny
    Maturity is closely tied to Responsibility. IMO not even then, it's when you truely accept the responsability.

    I went to univeristy right after high school and bombed out. Went into the army, the Canadian Army for years after that. Since, during that time, I was never seriously in dannger of losing life or limb, no real maturing happended there (there was a lot of drinking/bar hopping though).

    About 8 years later I realized the army wasn't a career. Was I becoming more mature? Nope, the money sucked.

    After ditching the army I went back to school and got a CS degree (made dean's list too one year). Mature? nope. well, perhaps. Was able to concentrate although I didn't take it that seriously.

    Graduated at the start of the boom, made lots of money, bought fast cars, got married. Did marriage make me 'mature'? nope.

    I even bought a house and started a business and made even more money. When I had 9 employees the responsability of having these people depend on me and the business for thier livelyhoods did make me pause a few times. No big deal, the business is going gangbusters no need to truely accept the responsibility. The status quo of immaturity continued thoughout the bust. I even had a couple of kids.

    Then the business tanked. Not suddenly but I could have handled it better if I had truely accepted the responsibility from the get go. Now I matured *fast*. took some wrangling (and most of my life savings) but all the *people* got thier due and the bogey man bills got paid.

    That left me out of work with little prospect for employment in my town. Little savings left, a big mortgage, and 5 mouths to feed. I was 38 feeling like a 55 year old.

    It took a year but I finally got a job paying less than half of what I was making before.

    I am a fully mature adult now, scraping to get by. Every cent we spend is carefully accounted for. No money for gadgets, movies, dinners out, vacations. We buy our duds at a used clothing store.

    I liked it better when I was immature.

    1. Re:Maturity is like getting run over by a bus by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      you should get a "+1 exactly". In fact, all other posts should be deleted so that everyone will be sure to read yours.

  56. as long as they vote by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the problem is not the 20 year old voting for the "right" candidate, the problem is all of the 20 year olds who didn't bother to vote because they were too busy playing gta: san andreas. the 40 year old may vote for the "wrong" candidate, but the point is, they VOTE. and that, in the end, is more important than anything else

    if a slight shade more 20 year olds had voted in 2000, for example, how would history be different?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:as long as they vote by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      who's to say that the 40 year old didn't vote for the right candidate and the 20 year old did. It's a silly, contrived example that means nothing. A candidate that's pro-environment doesn't necessarily make a better or more effective elected official. He may not even be better for the environment.

      Fact is, a person who votes without understanding the issues or the candidates isn't helping, and a person who doesn't vote because he know he's uninformed isn't hurting. The smart person realizes there are ways to have a more meaningful contribution to the process than voting, since large voter turnouts lead to "the rule of the dumbest". There's nothing less useful to the process than "MTV rock the vote". Those are the votes we don't want, those and the ones of ppl who devote all their thought into playing gta: san andreas.

      So, if a slight shade more 20 year olds had voted in 2000, history may have been different but in an arbitrary, who-knows-if-it's-better sort of way. Sure, anything would be better than George W. but the problem wasn't poor 20 year old voter turnout. 20 years olds in urban areas wouldn't have made a difference because Kerry was already strong there. 20 year olds in rural areas probably vote like their parents.

    2. Re:as long as they vote by leereyno · · Score: 0

      "If a slight shade more 20 year olds had voted in 2000, for example, how would history be different?"

      * The US would be secretly paying yearly tribute to Al-Qaeda in the hope of preventing future attacks.
      * Al-Qaeda would have launched even more attacks against us, financed by the very tribute we paid to it.
      * Women in Afghanistan would still be living under the worst sort of misogynistic tyranny imaginable.
      * Saddam Hussein would still be murdering his own people and working to obtain nukes.
      * The UN and France would still be helping him do it via the "Food for Oil" program.
      * Iran's nuclear weapons aspirations would be a far more serious threat without the US Army to the east and west of it, and the US Navy sitting just off the coast.
      * Kim Il-Sung might actually dare to believe that we wouldn't turn North Korea into a parking lot.

      I for one am very glad that so many idealistic 20 year olds voted....for Ralph Nader.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    3. Re:as long as they vote by leereyno · · Score: 1

      Large voter turnouts lead to "the rule of the dumbest"

      NO, it leads to the rule of the AVERAGE.
      You have heard of bell curve distribution right?

      Also the larger the group, the smarter the outcome:

      http://webcast-law.uchicago.edu/levmore-cbi-09-29- 05.mp3
      http://uchicagolaw.typepad.com/faculty/2005/11/the _wisdom_of_g_1.html

      http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0385503865/002-73 33566-8455228?v=glance&n=283155

      "Wise crowds" need (1) diversity of opinion; (2) independence of members from one another; (3) decentralization; and (4) a good method for aggregating opinions.

      In other words the process of voting will tend to choose the better candidate. The more people you have voting, the more likely this is to happen, regardless of their reasons for voting.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  57. Re:Bullshit study- control sucks by SirLanse · · Score: 1

    They need a better control group. How about some 25 year olds that are going to college for the first time? (Brain better keep growning) Or a group of 18yr olds that are still in High School? (smoking dope and brain does not change) The control group has little relationship to the test group. Maybe add some of the campus terrors(65 yr old single class retired curve busters) to the group. See how the old brains change.

  58. When Does Maturity Set In? by toupsie · · Score: 1

    When those damn kids won't get off your lawn!!!

    --
    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government.
  59. Amusing posts... by ElboRuum · · Score: 2, Informative

    You know, I've read a few of the posts and I am relatively amused. Most of the people who have stated a knowledge of their own immaturity would be shocked to hear that this realization is a mark thereof.

    It's the ones who think they've got it all figured out who are usually the most immature.

    One thing that maturity has taught me is what a completely immature person I was when I was younger and thought I was mature. Seems like an ongoing process.

    1. Re:Amusing posts... by ficken · · Score: 1

      Crazy people don't know they're crazy. Maybe the same could be said for mature people...

      --
      Victory shall be mine!
    2. Re:Amusing posts... by gobbo · · Score: 1
      One thing that maturity has taught me is what a completely immature person I was when I was younger and thought I was mature. Seems like an ongoing process.

      I'm still grappling with the 14-year-old in me who was frustrated that the world was grey but everyone talked in black-and-white. I'm over 40, don't party much, have kids and a mortgage, drive safely, have some great stories to tell and can handle most situations. But many of the foibles I struggled with as a child are still with me, and I don't feel mature, and don't really expect to.

      Is not feeling mature a sign of maturity? Or has raising kids given me perspective? I look around at my peers of all ages, and see the toddler barely concealed under the veneer of civility and confidence.

      The older I grow
      the more I recall
      how little I knew
      when I knew it all.
  60. Blah. by tabatj · · Score: 0

    Your tax money at work.

  61. Come on... by Landshark17 · · Score: 1

    I spent all this time getting to the societally accepted mature age of 18, please don't raise the bar on me now!

    --
    This sig is false.
  62. perhaps it's the branch by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    My family in the USAF were allowed to drink on base, and weren't THAT close to the Mexican border - Lackland for basic training IIRC, and various bases across the south as he trained on aircraft mechanics.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  63. I'm 27... by odyaws · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...and I'm still waiting.

    --
    Still trying to think of a clever sig...
  64. Making money in suburban real estate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A 22 year old with a handle on debt will be more mature than a 34 year old that is a renter in suburbia that is adamant that you can't make money in real estate.

    Making money in suburban real estate (my frame of reference is the Dallas/FtWorth metroplex) does not require maturity, rather it requires you to have no problems being crooked, ruthless, greedy, willing to cheat, steal and to lie your ass off with impunity, and have no scruples about doing any of those things to anyone, even the most downtrodden happless victims. And smile every minute of the time while you're doing it. If you're capable of such, you'll do well financially in the suburban real estate market. If you have even the tiniest trace of a real conscious or heart, you'll get squashed like a bug in an instant.

  65. Liberal Brainwashing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may have been subjected to some liberal brainwashing techniques. Quickly, while there is still time! Don an extra thick tin-foil hat, yes tin good aluminum bad, and watch many many hours of Fox News. Rig up an electric shock device or get a good old cattle prod. Everytime you think Hillary Clinton would make a good president, shock the living hell out of yourself.

    I am glad I didn't go to a Liberal Arts College. Those places are the schools of the Devil!

  66. Clearly the mods are not 35 by mapmaker · · Score: 1

    Funny, my ass. You should be modded +10 Insightful.

    1. Re:Clearly the mods are not 35 by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't worry, it will catch up with them in the end ;)

      Mind you, I've had arthritis since I was 15, which has lead to my philosophy on aging: you're never too young to be a geriatric, and never too old to have a happy childhood. Though the walking frame makes skateboarding a bit of a bugger...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  67. Are they measuring maturity at all? by Duck+of+Death · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do they know if they're measuring maturity or if they are seeing how the brain changes when a person has to adapt to significant new living conditions. Rather than just looking at 18 year old college students why not also look at:

    14-15 year olds who have been sent off to boarding school.

    Children of divorced parents who now move between two households and have to deal with step-families.

    Children who have lost their parents and who are now being raised by relatives.

    Saying that the brain changes when someone is put into a new situation where they are being forced to become more self-reliant is one thing, but labeling it "maturity" is a bit of a stretch. I know a fair number of pretty immature adults.

    Hey, here's an idea - don't give someone the rights of an adult until their brain has gone through these changes! "No, I'm sorry, sir, the brain scan still indicates you are not ready to drink or vote. Shall we make an appointment for another scan next year?"

    DD

    --
    "Can I finish? Can I finish? ... Okay, I'm finished."
  68. executive skills by Jeff1946 · · Score: 1

    This is not new information about brain development. About 15 years ago, I attended a lecture about gifted students who under performed. The lecturer commented that often for males the ability to perform executive tasks did not fully develop until age 25. Executive skills are defined as being able to take a large task and break it in to smaller tasks that are manageable in order to accomplish the task. In contrast the ability to play a simple video game that requires rapid hand-eye coordination was fully developed by age 6.

  69. Moving doesn't make you mature faster by cerebud · · Score: 1

    Most students I knew who lived on campus were less mature, not more. I had to commute an hour from my parents' house, work two to three jobs, and I'd say that I was much more mature than them. It's not that all kids who lived on college didn't have to work, of course. It's just that most worried more about parties or just their classes. I knew kids that were fairly competent in high school that became drug addled losers in college. I really question the methodology of this study. And it's insulting.

  70. Forced Maturity by SeanDuggan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When this happens, the oldest child can't seem to let go of this parental sense of responsability for the younger kids. It's almost like part of their childhood has been lost. So I agree. I think it has to do with the presence of responsability. Nothing makes you grow up faster than having to care for a child of your own.
    You can see the same thing in the children of alcoholics and the like. Forced to become the responsible adults in the family, they often have to give up on their childhood in the process. Major psychological pitfalls often lie ahead for them.

    Personally, I feel every child should have the opportunity to be a child, without major care or responsibility. It's not always been the historical precedent (adolescence, and especially the teenage period are relatively recent inventions within the last century or two), but I think it's been established as something necessary in today's society. Not to say that you shouldn't instill a sense of maturity and responsibility within your kids, but it's more along the lines of keeping their rooms clean and budgeting their allowance, not having to keep up the house finances and ensure that mummy and daddy get tucked into bed after they drink themselves into an alcoholic stupor.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  71. That's what I call science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another breathtaking discovery from those brilliant, brilliant (and chubby) scientists.

  72. Re:Amazing by Surt · · Score: 1

    I know that was just meant to be funny, but perhaps we should all get depressed instead over the news that once you pass 25 you can go to college and your brain won't change.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  73. A double blind methodology should have been used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    'For the study, Baird and graduate student Craig Bennett looked at the brains of nineteen 18-year-old Dartmouth students who had moved more than 100 miles to attend college. A control group of 17 older students, ranging in age from 25 to 35, were also studied for comparison.


    In addition to the previous groups studied, this study to show any merit should have looked at the brains of nineteen 18-year-old who did not go to college and did not have a change in environment (geographically) and see what development takes place.
     
  74. When Does Maturity Set In? Never! by ficken · · Score: 1

    When does maturity set in? Never! Just take a look at a politician - theres your proof.

    --
    Victory shall be mine!
  75. Brain Development... by Nephroth · · Score: 1
    Doesn't really end until the age of 25 in most people, that much has been seen. Interestingly enough, the last component of the brain to develop is the the one that helps one correlate current actions with future consequences.

    The US CDC categorizes teenagers as anyone between the ages of 13 to 25. Through their statistics, they have found that the perception of risk for HIV and various other sexually transmitted diseases is only marginally higher in someone who is 21 as compared to someone who is 15, or even younger.

    That being said, I'm 22.

    This poses an interesting question, I think, as I have been aware of this particular shortcoming of the human developmental cycle for some time. Growing up (and to this day) I have had a very strong interest in psychology and sociology, and because of that I have been making a conscious effort to make up for that which has not developed yet in my mind. The question is, by training myself to contemplate my actions and correlate outside circumstances with my own vulnerability to the point in which they are now instinctual, have I forced these sections of the brain to develop willfully? Or have I simply emulated it to the point in which it's like some sort of Pavlonian conditioning? Have I shortcut my own development, or will I find myself more able to perform these tasks in another few years?

    Looking back introspectively, I can say that I am much more mature now than I was even as little as three years ago. At 18 I was faced with finding a job and supporting myself indefinitely and while this was something that I was able to choke down, it was nothing that I was happy about. I managed to get myself decently employed and to remain in school at the same time, something I found immensely stressful at the time and it pushed the limits of my sanity pretty hard. Now days I cope with these things more easily. I am able to manage my money more effectively, not to mention my time and other resources. I find that I'm able to do much more in a day than I ever thought was possible, and I am more capable of dealing with situations that would have previously caused a panic, now cause a thirty minute budgeting session. Will I look back in another three years and recount to everyone how I was quite a fool? Will I be able to stand the company of my peers at 25? Because as it stands I find it hard getting along with people under the age of 30, let alone 25. I suppose the best thing to do is wait and see.

    --
    Our greatest enemy is neither a single man, nor is it a nation, it is, as it has always been, our own greed.
  76. Full Article Text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given my university status, here is the full article text:

    Research Article
    Anatomical changes in the emerging adult brain: A voxel-based morphometry study
    Craig M. Bennett 1 *, Abigail A. Baird 1 2
    1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Moore Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
    2Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Moore Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
    email: Craig M. Bennett (craig.bennett@dartmouth.edu)

    *Correspondence to Craig M. Bennett, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Moore Hall, Hanover, NH 03755

    Funded by:
    NICHD; Grant Number: R03 HD45742-01A1

    Keywords
    magnetic resonance imaging voxel-based morphometry human development

    Abstract
    Abstract INTRODUCTION SUBJECTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Acknowledgements References
    Research has consistently confirmed changes occur in brain morphometry between adolescence and adulthood. The purpose of the present study was to explore anatomical change during a specific environmental transition. High-resolution T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were acquired from 19 participants (mean age at initial scan = 18.6 years) during their freshman year. Scans were completed during the fall term and 6 months later before the conclusion of the school year. Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess within-subject change. Significant intensity increases were observed along the right midcingulate, inferior anterior cingulate gyrus, right caudate head, right posterior insula, and bilateral claustrum. Regional changes were not observed in two control groups; one controlling for method and another controlling for age-specific change over time. The results suggest that significant age-related changes in brain structure continue after the age of 18 and may represent dynamic changes related to new environmental challenges. Findings from the regions of change are discussed in the context of specific environmental demands during a period of normative maturation. Hum Brain Mapp, 2005. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
    Received: 2 March 2005; Accepted: 13 September 2005

    Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

    10.1002/hbm.20218 About DOI

    Article Text

    INTRODUCTION
    Abstract INTRODUCTION SUBJECTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Acknowledgements References

    The transition from adolescence to adulthood is known to be a time of tremendous change. Between the ages of 18 and 25, most young adults move away from their parents or guardians and become self supported for the first time [Cohen et al., [2003]]. Marked shifts in the romantic relationships, risk-taking behavior, insight, and worldviews of young adults have been well documented during this time [Arnett, [2000]]. Such research has demonstrated convincingly that a person continues to mature behaviorally between the ages of 18 and 25; however, changes in brain structure accompanying this period of development have remained unclear. A thorough understanding of the structural and functional changes occurring in the brain during young adulthood is critical to advancing our knowledge of the neural basis of cognitive, social, and emotional development.

    Postmortem studies were the first to reveal that development in the central nervous system begins during gestation and continues well into the third decade of life [Benes et al., [1994]; Brody et al., [1987]; Hunter et al., [1997]; Yakovlev and Lecours, [1967]]. These findings have been supported by work using positron emission tomography (PET), which can provide regional measures of baseline glucose metabolism. Using this method, cortical metabolic activity across the brain has been shown to reach stable, adult-like, levels in the mid-twenties [Van Bogaert et al., [1998]]. More recently, studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have confirmed that brain maturation continues throughout adolescence and into young adulthood. Specifically, white matter volume increases lin

  77. Read my sig by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

    This article is just another little study most likely commissioned by someone who wanted to set an age restriction on something.

    Read the sig.

  78. Maybe.... by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

    ...what they're seeing aren't the last stages of "maturity", but rather the earlier signs of old age?

    Drawing sweeping conclusions from only two groups and making all these blanket assumptions makes for a completely worthless study.

  79. I hope this is redundant by blair1q · · Score: 1

    What a crock of crap.

    Maturity doesn't "set in".

    It's forced on you by circumstance.

    Send a child to war and he'll grow up instantly.

    Send a poor little rich kid to the White House and, well...

    1. Re:I hope this is redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's remarkable, it would appear that average intellectual input from Slashdot posters is not significantly different from sampling in the population at large.

      ABSTRACT

      Research has consistently confirmed changes occur in brain morphometry between adolescence and adulthood. The purpose of the present study was to explore anatomical change during a specific environmental transition. High-resolution T1-weighted structural MRI scans were acquired from nineteen participants (mean age at initial scan = 18.6 years) during their freshman year. Scans were completed during the fall term and six months later before the conclusion of the school year. Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess within-subject change. Significant intensity increases were observed along the right midcingulate, inferior anterior cingulate gyrus, right caudate head, right posterior insula, and bilateral claustrum. Regional changes were not observed in two control groups; one controlling for method and another controlling for age-specific change over time. The results suggest that significant age-related changes in brain structure continue after the age of eighteen and may represent dynamic changes related to new environmental challenges. Findings from the regions of change are discussed in the context of specific environmental demands during a period of normative maturation.

  80. That's easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When a child (or a young adult) is allowed to take responsibility for his or her condition in life.

    In ancient Rome, it was not uncommon for 14 year olds to marry and hold public office.

  81. From experience... by catdevnull · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I would say that most people mature into more stable and "mature" people between 25 and 30. Not that younger people can't make mature decisions, it's just that the consistency starts to set in. Women tend to mature a bit earlier while men hold on to the "crazy" years a bit longer.

    Why do you think there's "SpikeTV?"

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
  82. Don't STUDY maturity -- find a CURE! by DulcetTone · · Score: 1

    In the West, over 80% of deaths occur to mature people. They also are responsible for dampening 75% of unrealized fun. Rather than learning how to live with this debilitating syndrome, can't we work on eradicating it?

    tone

    --
    tone
  83. Measuring Brain Development not "Maturity." by zacnboat · · Score: 1

    I think this is a worthwhile study, and I'm interested in reading the ACTUAL paper written by these scientists and not just the PR push from the Dartmouth marketing department. Ignore the buzz words and try to see the science...

    Why not look at the structural changes in the brain and attempt to assert a position on brain behavior and development that can be substantiated by actual data instead of "When I was 12 my parents, and my dog, died in a tragic back-hoe accident... and ever since then I've been mature." I think this study is asserting a very interesting position based on a significant amount of research done on their control group. Having hundreds of participants in your control group might have proved MORE interesting, but it is not necessary.

    The point, that I think they're trying to demonstrate with this study, is that the human brain continues to develop after the age of 18. If there is a corollary between brain development and "maturity" e.g. becoming an "adult" then they've certainly demonstrated that if "maturity" is based on brain development your not fully matured until much later than we initially believed.

    This study is VERY interesting as it relates to Juvenile culpability and responsibility. If our brain continues to develop after the age of 18 how culpable are we for crimes committed before the age of 18 or 25? Consider the implications of being able to determine when we are not simply "emotionally adult" but functionally adult, when our brains and bodies are no longer changing in such a way that we should be held MORE responsible for our actions.

    Disregarding this study simply because many of us were uber-geeks as teens and were intellectually if not emotionally more developed than our class-room counterparts does not negate the need, or the relevance, of this study. Our cognitive development may be based on a combination of intangible elements such as emotional growth and nurture, but the fact remains that the human body is a machine which can and should be studied to determine it's functional limitations and possibilities. Understanding the human animal, especially in relation to development, is an important area of study.

    Anyway, who wants to take bets on whether or not that grad student is reading the Slashdot forums as we speak. Hi, Craig!

    --
    "We're gonna need a bigger boat." - Jaws
  84. im old... by el+cuco · · Score: 1

    is it bad that i'm 30 and i still laugh when my brother farts?

  85. You actually have a point :) by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

    There are so many problems with this study, I don't know where to start. For one thing... how do we even measure maturity? Is it just a physical thing? Most people seem to think that a person is in their prime at around 30, and this study is examining brains, not physique, so I don't think that's the question. Personally, I would judge maturity as when someone "puts away childish things", like... their childish, self-centered worldview, and accepts that they're human, fallible, and really no better than anyone else. They develop a fairly complete reasoning faculty, and enough humility to admit when they're wrong, apologise, and learn from their mistakes. They accept responsibility for their actions, and take care of others as much as they can. I think some sense of spirituality is an important aspect of maturity too -- I'm NOT claiming that religion is required, though. Also... and this is why I'm replying to you... I think an ability to enjoy child-like things without actually being child-*ish* is a good sign too. By these standards, it seems that some people never grow up. The study didn't actually seem to define maturity, or look for people who were in the process of maturing, or had matured, even in the control group.

  86. Re:Think about why car insurance gets cheaper at 3 by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    There has to be a statistical reason why your car insurance is so absurdly high when you're a late teen

    I suspect that driving experience/knowledge is a bigger factor. While it's true that younger drivers are more likely to take risks and be more aggressive (which might be related to the driving experience/knowledge thing) it's also true that very good, well trained drivers can be more aggressive and have the ability to manage that aggression/risk.

    I've pointed out that one of the major failures of driving schools is that they teach 16 year olds to drive like grandmas. Of course, they get out into the world and they drive based on the fact that their perception and coordination skills are several times better than your average grandma, so to them what they are doing isn't all that risky. In reality, it's risky because they're not taught to drive to the level of their abilities.

  87. Re:The problem with this post (FULL TEXT of FA) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    full text of article--and please, don't thank me, thank Dartmouth's digital subscription to that journal.
    Figures and tables excised because the lameness filter wouldn't accept them.

    -AC, Dartmouth '06

    Anatomical changes in the emerging adult brain: A voxel-based morphometry study
    Craig M. Bennett 1 *, Abigail A. Baird 1 2
    1Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Moore Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
    2Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Moore Hall, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
    email: Craig M. Bennett (craig.bennett@dartmouth.edu)

    *Correspondence to Craig M. Bennett, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Dartmouth College, Moore Hall, Hanover, NH 03755

    Funded by:
    NICHD; Grant Number: R03 HD45742-01A1

    Keywords
    magnetic resonance imaging voxel-based morphometry human development

    Abstract
    Abstract INTRODUCTION SUBJECTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Acknowledgements References
    Research has consistently confirmed changes occur in brain morphometry between adolescence and adulthood. The purpose of the present study was to explore anatomical change during a specific environmental transition. High-resolution T1-weighted structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were acquired from 19 participants (mean age at initial scan = 18.6 years) during their freshman year. Scans were completed during the fall term and 6 months later before the conclusion of the school year. Voxel-based morphometry was used to assess within-subject change. Significant intensity increases were observed along the right midcingulate, inferior anterior cingulate gyrus, right caudate head, right posterior insula, and bilateral claustrum. Regional changes were not observed in two control groups; one controlling for method and another controlling for age-specific change over time. The results suggest that significant age-related changes in brain structure continue after the age of 18 and may represent dynamic changes related to new environmental challenges. Findings from the regions of change are discussed in the context of specific environmental demands during a period of normative maturation. Hum Brain Mapp, 2005. © 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
    Received: 2 March 2005; Accepted: 13 September 2005

    Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

    10.1002/hbm.20218 About DOI

    Article Text

    INTRODUCTION
    Abstract INTRODUCTION SUBJECTS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Acknowledgements References

    The transition from adolescence to adulthood is known to be a time of tremendous change. Between the ages of 18 and 25, most young adults move away from their parents or guardians and become self supported for the first time [Cohen et al., [2003]]. Marked shifts in the romantic relationships, risk-taking behavior, insight, and worldviews of young adults have been well documented during this time [Arnett, [2000]]. Such research has demonstrated convincingly that a person continues to mature behaviorally between the ages of 18 and 25; however, changes in brain structure accompanying this period of development have remained unclear. A thorough understanding of the structural and functional changes occurring in the brain during young adulthood is critical to advancing our knowledge of the neural basis of cognitive, social, and emotional development.

    Postmortem studies were the first to reveal that development in the central nervous system begins during gestation and continues well into the third decade of life [Benes et al., [1994]; Brody et al., [1987]; Hunter et al., [1997]; Yakovlev and Lecours, [1967]]. These findings have been supported by work using positron emission tomography (PET), which can provide regional measures of baseline glucose metabolism. Using this method, cortical metabolic activity across the brain has been shown to reach stable, adult-like, levels in the mid-twenties [Van Bogaert et al., [1998]]. More recently, studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have confi

  88. This is a surprise? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

    I'll be turning 28 this year, and I feel like I've still got plenty of maturing to do. When I think about what I was like at 18 or 20 or 22, I feel like I'm remembering a completely different person. Anyone in their late 20s or early 30s can tell you maturity doesn't magically appear when you graduate high school or stop being a teenager or even graduate college. And that's not in a "kids these days are so immature" way, it's "Wow, I can't believe I was so immature at that age".

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  89. Who thought people matured at 18? by qmVSE*w!7e,QF(, · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course people don't mature until their mid-to-late twenties. Why do you think that the U.S. military takes 18 to 26 year olds during drafts? It's because most 18 to 26 year olds aren't mature enough yet to have a nice, healthy fear of death, paralysis, disfigurement, etc. (This isn't a dig on anybody. I'm eternally grateful for the service of the men and women in the armed forces... it just takes a certain mindset that most people lose as they "mature".)

  90. amen brother by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    couldn't have said it better itself, you understand the spirit of democracy

    the person you are responding to meanwhile, would seem to be happier living in a corrupt autocratic orwellian state where some "know" and others "don't"

    can you believe that classist aristocratic bullshit?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:amen brother by leereyno · · Score: 1

      Attitudes like his are very common among the political left. You see, they don't actually believe in democracy.

      In any nation there will always be disagreement on public policy, on what the government should or should not do. There will never be complete agreement on what the policy is. The key to democracy is that it provides something that there can be agreement upon, the PROCESS by which the policy will be decided.

      The problem with the left is that they don't actually believe in democracy, except of course when it leads to the outcome that they want to see. When that outcome doesn't come, they quickly begin talking about how stupid voters are and how dangerous it is that so many people who obviously don't know what is good for them are allowed to have a say. Sound a little like the response to the 2004 election? All this in spite of the fact that the policies they espouse are demonstrably disastrous and have been every time and in every place they have ever been implemented. Who's stupid now?

      The truth is that the American people are almost notoriously good at choosing good candidates and good policies. Our nation has gone from being a backwater British colony to become the most powerful nation the world has ever seen. This is not by accident. Our culture and our political system combine to create a nation where good ideas tend to win out in the end, not always mind you, but a lot more often than not. When we do embrace bad ideas, we're willing to take a step back and try again with something else long before disaster strikes.

      There are a lot of people who seem to think that America is in trouble, that we're going down the tubes. Well I don't think so. There are problems to be faced just as there have always been, but our ability to meet those challenges is greater than at any other time in our history. Thanks to the internet the ability of the average voter to obtain many varied points of view on any given issue is at an all-time high. The fact that the Left no longer has a lock on the news media is also a very good thing. Not only that, but the ability of the lefties within the news media to lie and twist the facts is pretty much gone. Had something like the Memo-gate scam been attempted before the internet was ubiquitous it very likely would have succeeded. But because old media's lock on the eyes, ears and mind of the public was gone, the scam was quickly debunked, leading to the fall of Dan Rather and a deep stain upon the reputation of CBS News.

      The more information the average voter has, the more quickly good ideas will be embraced and good policies implemented as a result. Not only is our nation in a better shape than it once was thanks to the internet, but imminent and nascent democracies around the world have a much greater chance of succeeding and growing into nations of the free. The fact that cleptocracies like China are working hard to stifle the power of the internet as an instrument of liberation are testaments to its potency. But even these evil men cannot hold back the tide forever. Our world grows more and more free each day. Freedom, which is the birthright of all mankind, will eventually become a reality for all mankind.

      Lee

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  91. you are stupid and evil by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the end result of your thinking is aristocracy, autocracy, and classism

    why do we have juries of our peers?

    why trust joe sixpack to interpret complicated dna evidence instead of expert judges who have studied the matter?

    the reason is, these people have agendas. they are not impartial or neutral

    the problem with you is that you equate education and intelligence with what you are really talking about: indoctrination into a given agenda

    to you there is a "right" way that an elite subculture knows what is best and the common people can't possibly understand what is good for them

    this is the same type of thinking that runs china, for example

    your instincts are non-democratic

    a democracy places trust in it's PEOPLE because the people know better about who should rule them than anyone else, period, end of story

    if you don't trust the common man, move to north korea, where they understand the way you think very well

    you are genuinely stupid and evil

    if the united states as a democracy is ever to come to an end, it is because of people who think like you

    you are the enemy of democracy, the way you think

    you don't trust the common man

    you are an elitist snob

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  92. I wonder though by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As you have shown, maturity was brought upon by the hefty requirement for survival. What I would wonder is how this might 'erode' over time as the responsibility is lessened, and/or they children are exposed to the more carefree individuals of a similar age.

    Moreover, how well do your children interact with children of their own age? I have a family member who adopted a young girl from Russia. She's been with his family for a long time now and you really couldn't much tell where she came from, but in the beginning she seemed to carry a very heavy load.


    Also, to you and all who are willing to give these children an extra chance at life: bless you, and may happiness smile upon you and your family.

  93. Addiction prohibits maturity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a recovering addict, I found that my maturity growth slowed dramatically when my addiction took hold. It wasn't until I started getting sober that I realized I was behind the rest of the world. I was a functioning adult with the maturity level of a 12 year old. A bad combination. There are ways to get out of the disease of addiction though.

    Alcoholics Anonymous - Alcohol (duh)
    Narcotics Anonymous - Drugs
    Overeaters Anonymous - Food
    Co-Dependants Anonymous - Co-Dependancy
    Sexaholics Anonymous - Internet Porn
    Gamblers Anonymous - Internet/Live Gambling

    The poison chooses the cure.

  94. Anybody else surprised? by koafc · · Score: 1

    Anybody else surprised that the answer wasn't 42?

  95. Always ask why someone is asking by Expert+Determination · · Score: 1

    Humans change throughout their lives - whether it's puberty, menopause or old-age grumpiness due to hormonal changes. So when someone decides to investigate when "maturity" happens they are introducing a cutoff. In such a situation the important question is to ask why they are doing this - it's almost certainly not a pure research issue if they are giving it a name like "maturity". For example they may be trying to justify a political position: maybe something about the age of consent or the age of majority. It might not be apparent from their research but you can be sure it's there.

    --
    "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
  96. When does maturity set in? by EmagGeek · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're asking slashdot?

  97. Real maturity... by thewiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    doesn't set in until an individual is willing to take responsibility for ALL of their actions, good or bad. I've met young children who are very mature and senior citizens that refuse to take responsibility for anything in their lives.

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:Real maturity... by themusicgod1 · · Score: 1

      I'm all for taking responsibility for actions but...
      How the hell do you do this? Will every ant I smush require payment to his family for damages? What about all the air I'm breathing? I don't think I have any way of really making it less CO2 since I don't own anything that could grow plants with. What about all the time I'm wasting of people who are reading these words here on slashdot? The people who are hurt because their loved ones are wasting time on slashdot? the people who are negatively effected by people who are vocal with them due to psychological struggling with themselves due to the lack of their loved ones who are too busy being tied up reading my words on slashdot?

      There are externalities that no one considers, while your guideline is a good one, I don't think it's airtight.

      --
      GENERATION 26: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  98. You're not quite on the same topic as the rest of by voxel · · Score: 1

    us here.

    Maturity != Responsibility.

    Think of the word in the more literally sense. For something to mature is to reach it's development peak or hop over the bell curve and reach close to 90% of it, then its mature. Same applied to financial markets, your bonds can "mature", etc.

    So, you can have a 80 year old man thats not responsible, but his brain technically "matured" to its development peak, perhaps when he was 24 years old.

    You can also have a 6 year old thats very responsible, puts away all his toys and keeps his room clean, but that doesn't mean that his brain has matured, it will continue changing at a rapid rate and his core personality will change for a while after that.

    There isn't alot you can do in your environment to alter this primative function of your brain reaching maturity.

    At least I hope, and beleive that this is what these reseachers are truely trying to observe.

    --
    Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
  99. I hope you are trolling. by Medievalist · · Score: 1


    If not, I recommend you get aquainted with someone who works professionally in the adoption system and ask to see the listings of children available for adoption for any state in the USA.

  100. Re:Think about why car insurance gets cheaper at 3 by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

    With a little stretch of the imagination we could make a much larger theory out of your statement regarding risk/car insurance.

    Lets assume everyone (of any age) is fully intelligent and mature, being as intelligent and mature as they are, they would of course take action based on a weighted-risk decision making process.

    Now this very intelligent and mature person knows, that in their younger years, they have very little risk. Very little to lose. No mortgage to pay, no kids to take care of, no wife to beat, etc.

    Hence the decisions made by these entirely equally intelligent (and mature!) youngsters are perfectly logical. They are able to do things which may seem a bit crazy to the older folk with more to lose, but given their nice young (and simple) circumstances, the decision is quite logical.

    Same reason most of your fancy startup companies are coming from kids who dropped out of Stanford... They have very little to lose. Sure, all the super wise older teachers, parents, mentors tell them they are crazy, stupid, and immature... But they aren't crazy, they've just got nothing to lose.

    But don't listen to me, I'm only 12 :).

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  101. Possible Definition of Maturity by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    Maturity -n.- muh-CHUR-i-TEE (someone's going to have to tell me where to find the schwa character)

    1. The state of being where a person derives a sense of realism and perspective where there was little or none previously.

    2. The condition of being as in 1. with the corollary realization of one's previous lack in this regard and a desire to assume the responsibilities associated with that realization.

  102. There is no age that you reach maturity by Metex · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "During the first year of college, especially at a residential college, students have many new experiences," says Baird. "They are faced with new cognitive, social, and emotional challenges. We thought it was important to document and learn from the changes taking place in their brains."


    Maturity happens through experiances. There is no age for it. I have met 12 year olds who are more mature and functional in the real world then the people I go to college with. It is just a matter of how much criticle thinking you have to do for your own welfare.

    I personally think this study is pretty meaningless in order to find out when maturity sets in. Your putting your subjects through a (somewhat) emotionally traumatic event and seeing what effects it has on the brain. The only thing I think this will do is see how does changing from an enviroment where responsibility is on someone else's shoulder to one where it is not effects the brain.
    --
    Never could figure out why my girl liked my bitch tits, then I found out she was a lesbian.
  103. Re:Think about why car insurance gets cheaper at 3 by asuffield · · Score: 1

    There has to be a statistical reason why your car insurance is so absurdly high when you're a late teen, with a steady decrease before a significant reduction at the age of 35.

    There's elementary survival statistics here, for one thing. Significant numbers of the worst drivers get themselves killed; the survivors will overall be better drivers. Older people have survived longer therefore are more likely to be better drivers.

  104. MODERATORS! Re:contorl group by koekepeer · · Score: 1

    never thought i'd ask this :-D

    please mod me (parent post) down! if you read the reply to my post, you will see i was reasoning from wrong assumptions

  105. Maturity when it's needed by bobcote · · Score: 2, Interesting

    During WWII there were teenagers flying fighter planes and officers in their 20s commanding warships. In peace time parents are reluctant to let a teenager take the Volvo and what company would routinely entrust someone in their early 20's with an asset as valuable as a destroyer or attack submarine?

    Remove the safety net and people mature quickly, taking on incredible responsibility. Knowing Daddy's lawyer and credit cards can bail you out of trouble retards maturity.

  106. The answer to the question is... by l0tu53at3r · · Score: 0

    27.

    If you're lucky.

    --
    ---Excuse the bad English, I'm American---
  107. Money vs. Happiness by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    Money can't buy you happiness, but it can rent it for you.
    Similarly, money can't buy you love, but again, it's available for rent.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  108. Basis of Voting by SeanDuggan · · Score: 1

    You see 20 year olds voting for those politicians who CLAIM to care really care about the environment and the world's state. In other words those 20 year olds were young enough to be had.
    More frightening, I know some girls in high school who voted for Clinton because he looked cuter. Then again, I've found more older people who vote straight party lines which I personally see as about the most idiotic voting practice you can do. Anyone else think it's a disservice to encourage people to vote when they're disinclined to it? You get people voting who don't know the issues, don't know the candidates. Everyone should have the right to vote. Only those willing to intelligently vote ought to.

    --
    This sig has absolutely no significance and serves only to take up screen space and waste the time of the reader.
  109. When indeed? by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    The results indicate that significant changes took place in the brains of these individuals. The changes were localized to regions of the brain known to integrate emotion and cognition. Specifically, these are areas that take information from our current body state and apply it for use in navigating the world.

    Are not.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  110. With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility..thus by sebazdenton · · Score: 1

    I am 22, and have spent most of my life since 13 studying at schools in different countries then the one where my family lives and works. Thus, I guess that whole '100 miles or more' from the article applies to me, but for high school it was more like 2000 miles, and for college more like 12000 miles. I am currently a director on the board of three companies in my father's group with a combined turnover of $10,000,000.00 annually, in the jewellry manufacturing, diamond polishing, and luxury retail sectors. While this is not a massive turnover by any means, being as we are located in a developing country, and that we employ over 150 people across the group, and that we've been around since 1970, we are in the top 125 companies in my country (top 100 in a few years if everything goes to plan). What does this have to do with maturity? Well, being 22, male, having gone to a liberal arts college in the USA, having grown up on a tropical island, yep, its a developing independant island nation, I naturaly am completely spoiled, party-addicted, hopelessly immature, ex-school and university party and comedic personality, and basically the type of person who was late for everything in all parts of my education and life, perpetually underachieved and defaulted on my responsiblities due to party binges, I handed in my all-too long thesis that I still don't believe is finished on the last possible day, a month late of the original final deadline, still somehow graduated with my double major, and promptly stopped on stage at graduation, attempted to coerce the crowd into increased applause, which they obliged, and then swayed over to the president to collect my degree. Now, less about me, more about maturity. I was asked by my father to come back here to work with him, and I naturally wanted to come and hang out back home for a while (tropical island, duh!), so I said okay during my winter break before graduation, little did I know what I was getting into. Two days after graduation, I was in New York, meeting clients, and learning the business in their many offices for two weeks. This entire work and responsibilty shock snow-balled to the point where my father, after dragging me all over to meet our associates and giving me a few months running around the companies and departments, just threw me into the top of the management structure, and stepped back, and in fact over the last three months, our peak selling season at retail, he has been overseas not really on business for about a month, and was at home, albeit with a sprained ankle, for 3 weeks, with me driving him to work when he wanted! On top of this, leaving me to take care of any other personal investment projects that he seems to have conveniantly left to me to look after. The long and short of all this is that I have and had no desire to manage the family finances, and thus be responsible for myself, my mother and my sister, be responsible to all those employees for the health of the company and thus their jobs, their familes income and thus lives, and any and all the other mistakes and irresponsibilites my father may have made in the past that have been thrust on me as a new manager and memeber of the controlling family, but I unfortunately have had no choice thus far, I have been forced to give up my life, from getting drunk 4 days a week, getting high everyday, basically being one of those people you hate if you work hard because they seem to never do, to someone who never goes out, who falls asleep in front of the TV on Friday nights while all his friends are waiting for him at the bars/restaurants/nightclubs, and in fact I've even started doing the same thing Sat nights as I work Saturdays to, and I can't do the whole socializing and work thing anymore, I tried so hard for the first 6 months but its nearly impossible now, I even used to go out mid-week in the begining. So the question is, am I more mature because I've changed my life to adapt to these responsibilites that I can't avoid because there are so many people depending on me to be there everyday, to work at

  111. An obvious answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Maturity sets in when you realise that the volume control turns down, too.

  112. physiologizing by brre · · Score: 1
    I studied the homunculus and found that he matures at at 18. That's why maturity arrives in you at age 18.

    In other words: this simply reeks of physiologizing. Maturity is a class of behaviors. If you want to know when it typically develops, get off your ass and measure that. What happens inside the skin adds nothing to the account.

  113. The study is flawed by Madslasher · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In judging when maturity sets in, this experiment automatically assumes it is when a person goes to college? How is this a legitimate study?

  114. Need more than one control by Mab_Mass · · Score: 1
    It should be noted that when we talk about a control group, we need to be explicit about what is being controlled.

    In this study, their control group is designed to control the variable of age.

    You are absolutely right in thinking they need to think of more details, since perhaps there is a difference between college and non-college students.

    This is why in a good scientific experiment, we often talk about controls, plural, not control, singular.

    My guess is that the researchers didn't look beyond college students for the simple reason that they are at a university, and it is easy to get student volunteers for a study but hard to get non-student volunteers.

  115. Hey dickhead mods... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Read the fucking story title, then read my post, then jump off a cliff for a modding it a troll. Why can't you learn to establish the context before modding like a reactionist machine parser?

  116. Three cents says you do by buck-yar · · Score: 1

    Driving.

    You ever think about how you accelerate or brake? I do. Sometimes i brake at a linear rate (second deriv = 0). Sometimes I brake at a progressive rate (second deriv != 0). Its all in whether you're going for a certain deceleration rate or if you're responding to the situation (or neither).

  117. Well, except that is not true by Ogemaniac · · Score: 1

    Approximatly 90% of people who are in the top 1% of wealth today did not have parents who were in the top 1%. Income mobility is extreme in the US.

    Having grown up in a dirt-poor rural area, I know for a fact that the vast majority of poor people who are there are there precisely because of decisions they have made. Luck has little to do with it. Same is true on the other end. I have yet to meet a smart, hard-working poor person (well, except grad students and post docs, but that is another story).

  118. uh... no by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    there are just as many on the right who are undemocratic as on the left

    in the 1990s, in the age of newt gingrich, everything you just said would have applied, except replace "left" with "right" and visa versa

    even what you said about the media: it's funny how the right complained about the left dominated media in the 1990s, and now in the 2000s the left complains about the right dominated media with the rise of fox news and such

    complaining about the media, from the right or the left is a retarded cop out, blaming the media for what the american people, whom we both have faith in, have decided for themselves

    the pendulum swings, back and forth... in the 2010s the left will be ascendant again, in the 2020s the right, etc...

    and no matter what the braindead kneejerk partisans or demagogues, from the right OR left say, we both know the american people, the great silent moderate middle, will decide what is best

    the fringes- on the right or left, are loud and dumb, and the moderate middle is quiet and wise

    and thus the power of democracy, the quiet middle always wins, it lends incredible legitimacy and stability to our government

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  119. Sounds like research by type A personalities by bandmassa · · Score: 1

    With the western idea of "maturity" comes the death of creativity. Never grow up!

    --
    "I hope you like Guinness, Sir. I find it a refreshing substitute for, er... food." Col. Jack O'Neil, SG-1