Slashdot Mirror


Polite Cell Phones

yEvb0 writes "Researchers at Motorola and Carnegie Mellon University are developing more polite cell phones. Strategies include programming the ringer to turn on and off according to the time of day, monitoring sound light levels to determine if the owner is a movie theater or talking to his boss, and even letting callers decide whether they'd like to interrupt based on this information."

292 comments

  1. good sales strategy by rd4tech · · Score: 2, Funny

    monitoring sound light levels to determine if the owner is a movie theater

    Ok, I'm confused enough, now, where can I buy this cellphone from?

    1. Re:good sales strategy by kannibal_klown · · Score: 2, Insightful
      monitoring sound light levels to determine if the owner is a movie theater


      Phones ringing are bad. Yes. But you know what? That's because people are inconsiderate jerks.

      I remember going to a couple of movies in a row. Each time, not only did a phone ring, but at least once a guy would answer the phone and start talking in his "cell phone voice." In other words, twice as loud as a person would normally talk. One movie, a guy's phone went off like 5 times. Each time he'd have a loud conversation. Unforunately, this guy was HUGE and mean looking so nobody wanted to be the guy to say "shut up a--hole!"

      There's no way to get around people. Even if you have the phone set to vibrate automatically (light+sound, radio flag, or GPS), some jerk will still answer the flipping thing and disturb everyone.
    2. Re:good sales strategy by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      Imho, none of these are solutions - they all require behaviour on the part of the user to be polite. The opposite approach should've been default. A venue should be able to mark themselves as "quiet" or "silent" by having a "venue flag broadcasting device".

      The phone would then enter either a "vibrate only" or "pager/SMS only" mode. Doctors and other emergency service personnel could, in turn, get this feature overridden by their provider if they can show need.

      Parents, on the other hand, could still recieve text messages and voicemail, allowing them to excuse themselves to return the call.

      This stuff, in general, should've been designed into the GSM standard a long time ago.

    3. Re:good sales strategy by somersault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A venue should be able to mark themselves as "quiet" or "silent" by having a "venue flag broadcasting device".

      woohoo! Then we could all carry around broadcasters that stop anyone within 200 metres from us from having their phone ring _

      I've not actually had any problem with people in cinemas here recently, maybe people are just more polite in the UK (and I've been going to the cinema a LOT in the last few months because I have an 'unlimited' card ^^; )

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:good sales strategy by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      Until there is a solution for this, I see no reason to pay to watch movies in a theater.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    5. Re:good sales strategy by Compulsion · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're just not as sensitive to the interruption since you're not shelling out a ridiculous amount of cash to see the movie.

      At one point in the not so distant past, my wife worked at a movie theatre. As such, I could see as many movies as I pleased for free. I remember leaving satisfied by even mediocre movies (Riddick). Now I have to spend $20 just for tickets for the two of us to see a movie. I'm more aware of conversations and ringing phones than previously. It's now far less likely for me to feel I got my money's worth after a night at the movies.

    6. Re:good sales strategy by somersault · · Score: 1

      yeah occasionally you get talkers and do want to turn round and scream at them or something, but I guess you are right, I dont even mind missing the start of movies, the idea being that I could see them again if I wanted I guess. Normal cinema prices aren't worth it at all, but paying £11 a month for as many shows as you want seems a good deal to me, so much so that I even bought some grossly overpriced Nachos the other day! No, they werent worth it. :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:good sales strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ok, so your boss calls and the phone tells him you're at his house in a darkened room with a moderate noise level... hmmm, time to look for a new job! eh?

    8. Re:good sales strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> monitoring sound light levels to determine if the owner is a movie theater

      Neat. A phone that has the ability to determine that it's in a movie theater, and not deep-down in my pocket with my coins and wooly-booger-what-nots.

    9. Re:good sales strategy by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      "cell phone voice."

      I *hate* the phone voice. Phones, unlike people's ears, can pick up your voice when you use quiet, directed speech. You can talk on your cell phone such that the person on the other end can hear you fine, but somebody 3 feet away can't make out what you're saying. People who use a loud "phone voice" are fucking morons.

      As a solution, I propose that cell phones be made such that talking too loudly cuts you off. It'll make the problem worse for a little while, and then solve it entirely.

    10. Re:good sales strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As a solution, I propose that cell phones be made such that talking too loudly cuts you off. It'll make the problem worse for a little while, and then solve it entirely.

      This will probably not work. I guess that it will only result in that the person gets annoyed (and starts to talk even louder).
      A better solution is to increase the volume of the received speech. Since we generally think that the person we talk to hear our voice at the same volume as we hear theirs, this will work (I hope/think).
    11. Re:good sales strategy by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the person calling has some common sense or respect for others.

    12. Re:good sales strategy by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1
      You're assuming the person calling has some common sense or respect for others.

      Maybe, but most of my callers aren't deliberately inconsiderate, they're just unaware. But what I really hate is machines that make assumptions about what I want. That's why I would never buy a phone that is programmed to interrupt under certain circumstances.

      Maybe I'm unusual in this, but I have a strict personal policy of keeping my phone on silent or vibrate when I'm somewhere it'll inconvenience others. But equally importantly, I also never answer it when I'm talking face-to-face with someone else; I'll just tell them I'm not going to answer it, and let it ring until the voicemail kicks in.

      After all, 99% of the time a voicemail or text message is all that is needed, and it certainly is not necessary to be rude to someone's face.

    13. Re:good sales strategy by Fishead · · Score: 1

      I also never answer it when I'm talking face-to-face with someone else; I'll just tell them I'm not going to answer it

      I like that. If you have call display, and voicemail, under most circumstances there is no reason you can't call back when the conversation is over. Just shows respect. The president of our company does that when talking to me (lowly tech) sometimes. Makes you feel important.

          If I was out with the wife, had a sitter for the kids, and saw my home number phoning... that would be different. Going someplace that would block any incoming calls would be totally unacceptable. Broadcasting a flag to put my phone on vibrate... sounds like a good idea. "Smart" phone thinking my wife's purse under the seat of my car is the inside of a movie theatre... not so cool.

  2. It's Called 'Vibrate' by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Set your phone to vibrate. It's been working for me for years. Non-invasive when doing anything in my daily routine.

    Is there really a reason I should have to enter my schedule into my phone? Because it's not going to happen.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by heinousjay · · Score: 1

      Some of us use our phones to keep our schedule.

      --
      Slashdot - where whining about luck is the new way to make the world you want.
    2. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by LinuxHam · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not to mention something Nextel has had for years. If I put my regularly scheduled meetings in my datebook, I can program the phone to switch to vibrate on its own, shut off the two-way radio feature, and even decide who in my phonebook is allowed to ring through, just for the length of the meeting. Its really an excellent feature, and I love it.

      --
      Intelligent Life on Earth
    3. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Set your phone to vibrate. It's been working for me for years. Non-invasive when doing anything in my daily routine.

      Is there really a reason I should have to enter my schedule into my phone?


      The idea behind this is that people forget to do this, so the phone does it automatically. That's why they want you to enter your schedule. Of course, people *conscious* of those around them and *concerned* about the impacts of their actions on others probably *already* do this consistently enough not to need one. The people least likely to buy the "polite" phone are the ones who probably need it the most.

      --
      Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
    4. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Vibrate is not always the best option:
      A couple examples:
      At church, during a quiet time, a hip-worn cell vibrating against a Wooden Pew makes a lot of noise...
      During one of my MBA classes, one guys phone was always vibrating, and it was distracting. Especially during exams.
      There are many more examples, but I have to get back to work...

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    5. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 4, Funny

      At church, during a quiet time, a hip-worn cell vibrating against a Wooden Pew makes a lot of noise...

      Well, I mean... they already have the crosses and nails there, right? Seems like a no-brainer to me.

    6. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Helios1182 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps it would be easy to simply move the cell phone away from the hip? Stick it in a shirt pocket, move it to be on your lap. Some problems are so easily solved without technology. As for the MBA guy, well, I suppose you were lucky it was on vibrate. The prof or you could have mentioned something, especially in the exam. Otherwise, there will always be inconsiderate people, and technology can't fix that.

    7. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Very tacky.

      But notice that if your insult had targeted an Islamic mosque instead of a Christian church, the targets of your joke would be murdering innocent people right now.

    8. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey! A thin-skinned, racist Christian!!! Off-topic much?

    9. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by rmallico · · Score: 1

      wish the blackberry would have something like that (not vibrate, but enable/disable a profile based on the calendar it as internally)... i have been asking around for at least 2 years that it would be so EASY to have the blackberry enable/disable a ringer profile based on your schedule from the calendar is has sitting there on the phone itself... some things just escape me how they get past product development... being in QA for a few years way back I then realize that development sometimes IS done in a vacuum, even when it comes to things like this... there is probably some 3rd party download out there... just not had time to dig it up, try it, be disappointed by it, delete it, go back to complaining like i am here.. :)

      --
      sig goes here!
    10. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by lampiaio · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Is there really a reason I should have to enter my schedule into my phone? Because it's not going to happen.

      Well, you really don't have to. My college has a (free) service that allows you to subscribe to your class schedule in an iCal-readable file format, which is then exported to my bluetooth cellphone so it knows when to automatically change to silent mode. I don't really have to enter anything into my phone, and any changes in schedule are automatically re-exported to my phone whenever it gets within range of the computer.

      you know, it's that newfangled "technology" thingie, as they call it. It's supposed to work.

      --
      My other account has mod points.
    11. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by jheath314 · · Score: 1

      REPENT! :)

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    12. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Islam isn't a race.

    13. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A typical islamophobic clueless idiot.

    14. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Vibrate is not always the best option:

      When a cell phone on vibrate is going to be too distracting to others, THEN TURN IT OFF!

      You have two options:

      1) Accept that cell-phone use in certain situations is inappropriate and don't use them.
      2) Don't put yourself in those situations.

      You used church as your example. Why are you there? To talk to God? (sorry, God, I need to take this call...wtf?) Or are you there just to be seen? (yeah, I'm here to look good, but I'm going to be an ass and disrupt the service dealing with my phone...wtf??)

      Seriously, if your cellphone going ringy-dingy is more important than the service you are attending, why are you there?

    15. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by unknownideal · · Score: 1

      Finally a unified argument against religion and hip-worn electronics.

    16. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You used church as your example. Why are you there? To talk to God? (sorry, God, I need to take this call...wtf?)


      Yeah, if you are a doctor you can just ask God to hold off on any emergencies for the duration...
    17. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Kelson · · Score: 1

      At church, during a quiet time, a hip-worn cell vibrating against a Wooden Pew makes a lot of noise...
      During one of my MBA classes, one guys phone was always vibrating, and it was distracting. Especially during exams.


      Reminds me of some of my college classmates.

      One had a pager that was louder on vibrate than on sound. The case was loose and couldn't be tightened.

      Then there was the friend whose office desk started vibrating mysteriously, because the phone sitting on the desk was still on vibrate.

      When it comes down to it, sound is vibration. The difference is just that one mode vibrates a speaker, designed to get the air going, and another vibrates the case. Put that case on any sort of sounding board, and you get noise.

    18. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      Huh? you make assumptions my friend. I agree with you, cells should be turned off at least, but better not brought into sanctuaries. I was referring to the fact that I have heard many a cell vibrating against pews. I was not refering to my cell in church. I leave my cell in my car when I go to church.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    19. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by paeanblack · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if you are a doctor...

      That excuse is worthless. People like doctors, firemen, etc, who actually need to be on call figured out how to unobtrusively use pagers and cellphones a long time ago. The obnoxious asshats are the ones who are only trying to look important.

    20. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by JourneyExpertApe · · Score: 1

      What if he's a physician with one of his patients in the hospital? Should he give up going to church (or any other activity that you deem incompatable with cell phones,) or should he put his patient's health in danger so as not to offend you? How about just not wearing you phone on your hip when you're sitting on a wooden bench in a quiet place?

      --
      If you can read this sig, you're too close.
    21. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, I have burned down a U.S. embassy to avenge this insult.

    22. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Alternatively: If your phone supports it, set it to RING ONLY ONCE.

      If it doesn't support it, get one that does.

    23. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      You used church as your example. Why are you there? To talk to God? (sorry, God, I need to take this call...wtf?) Or are you there just to be seen? (yeah, I'm here to look good, but I'm going to be an ass and disrupt the service dealing with my phone...wtf??)

      The problem is walking into church and not remembering to set your phone to vibrate. And then, of course, setting your phone down somewhere, forgetting to turn the ringer back on, stepping into the other room, and missing an important call.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    24. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by ross.w · · Score: 1

      I once set my phone to vibrate for a meeting (as one does) and then left it on the table instead of in my pocket.

      It rang during the meeting and started moving across the table, scaring the crap out of the guy sitting next to me.

      SO much for discretion.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    25. Re:It's Called 'Vibrate' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you'd like every religion to be as pussyass as (modern) christianity?

  3. vibrate? by schnits0r · · Score: 1

    And this is differnt from telling users to set their phones to vibrate?

    1. Re:vibrate? by dave420 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It will work regardless of whether the phone owner is rude or not. Like someone on the bus who gets a call they don't want to answer, and their phone is not on silent. They just stare at the phone as it rings and rings. I hate 'em. There is absolutely no reason for phones to have ring tones at all. The amount of intrinsic rudeness in mobile phones is ridiculous.

  4. once again, trying to get machines to "think" by acroyear · · Score: 4, Interesting

    since people obviously don't anymore...

    --
    "But remember, most lynch mobs aren't this nice." (H.Simpson)
    -- Joe
  5. I heard something about this long ago by bilbravo · · Score: 1

    Very similar to this idea... I think (especially with more and more bluetooth phones), it should be possible to turn phones to silent/vibrate (manner mode on my phone) when entering certain places, such as theatres and restaurants. Although, some will cry "invasion of privacy" or "taking away my rights", but I cry "I don't want my movie interrupted by your stupid cell phone".

    1. Re:I heard something about this long ago by mwvdlee · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Taking away my rights" is what happens when I throw their phone in the nearest trashcan, "Invasion of privacy" happens after that, when they feel the sudden impact of my foot in their groin.
      Thankfully, restaurants and theaters are allowed to block cellphone transmissions here in the Netherlands.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:I heard something about this long ago by plover · · Score: 1
      I think it'd be great if the phone had an option I could turn on to say "Respect requests for silence via Bluetooth." Then places where silence is desired (nice restaurants, movie theaters, libraries, churches, funeral homes) could have a Bluetooth transmitter at the entryway saying "Go silent until X:00", or "Go silent for three hours."

      Of course I'd like to have a bit more control than that. There are some places where I'd like the phone to go "dead" and others where I'd prefer it to go to vibrate mode. And my choice for behavior probably won't be the same as the institution setting up the transmitters. For example, I would want it to go absolutely silent for a funeral, but I would want vibrate mode if I went into a church.

      Anyway, it's not an invasion of privacy if I request the feature and turn it on voluntarily. In that case, it's simply a convenience for me.

      --
      John
    3. Re:I heard something about this long ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Taking away my rights" is what happens when I throw their phone in the nearest trashcan, "Invasion of privacy" happens after that, when they feel the sudden impact of my foot in their groin.

      Lead poisioning is what will happen to you eventually someday.

    4. Re:I heard something about this long ago by plover · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Thankfully, restaurants and theaters are allowed to block cellphone transmissions here in the Netherlands.

      We went to a nice restaurant yesterday morning for breakfast. The building was entirely copper clad. We got no signal inside, and we were just fine with that.

      They call themselves "Copper Bleu", but I think a better name for them would be "Faraday's."

      --
      John
    5. Re:I heard something about this long ago by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > "Taking away my rights" is what happens when I throw their phone in the nearest trashcan, "Invasion of privacy" happens after that, when they feel the sudden impact of my foot in their groin.

      Solution obvious: In parallel to the little off-centered cam/motor arrangement used for "vibrate" mode, add a solenoid with a coil and plunger that run the length of the phone.

      When you walk into a restaurant or movie theater, your phone obeys a store-owner-generated signal to switch to "cockpunch" mode and broadcast its relative position to nearby phones.

      Hey, if someone's showing off how many friends they have by letting their phone ring ("Look at me! People want to talk to me all the time!") I see no reason why we can't all give him a ring.

    6. Re:I heard something about this long ago by vertinox · · Score: 1

      "I don't want my movie interrupted by your stupid cell phone".

      Peter Jackson is that you?

      No but seriously, these aren't your movies. You didn't make them nor do you own the rights to them. You only pay a fee to aquire a license so your eyes can see them. There is an army of MPAA lawyers who will vouch for this.

      But it is still rude to have a cell phone ringing and interupt the licensed viewing of said movies.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    7. Re:I heard something about this long ago by DuranDuran · · Score: 1

      > No but seriously, these aren't your movies. You didn't make them nor do you own the rights to them.

      I do own these movies actually. I did make them. The MPAA does not represent me, nor any self respecting short film maker. And I don't want phones going off when I'm screening them.

      feel dumb yet?

      --
      "You can justify anything by putting it in quotes, adding a famous name and making it a sig" - Albert Einstein
  6. They should research by endrue · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a polite human being.
    Seriously folks! How hard is it to turn off the ringer? Are we so daft these days that our phones have to be polite for us?

    --
    I meta-moderate because I care.
    1. Re:They should research by thanuk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are we so daft these days that our phones have to be polite for us? Yes. Next question please.

    2. Re:They should research by jfengel · · Score: 1

      So you've never once forgotten to turn off your cell phone in a meeting?

      And the trick, I've found, isn't so much turning the thing to ringer as turning it back afterwards. I'll discover the following day that I've missed a call or two when my phone was out of my pocket and set to buzz.

      Perhaps a better (and simpler) algorithm would be to detect if the phone was in close proximity to the user. If it's in my pocket, always vibrate. If it's on the table recharging, always ring. Not perfect, but it sounds more practical.

    3. Re:They should research by zymurgy_cat · · Score: 1

      a polite human being. Seriously folks! How hard is it to turn off the ringer? Are we so daft these days that our phones have to be polite for us?

      Also, how hard is it to not answer the frickin' phone in the first place when you're doing something else like watching a movie or (gasp!) talking to another human being?

      I can understand emergencies or when you're waiting on time-sensitive information, but many rude people would not change their behavior one bit with such "polite" phones.

      --
      -- Fugacity: Confusing chemists since 1908
    4. Re:They should research by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      Nokia phones for the past several years have supported user-groups with varying rings depending on your mode. I do have some contacts where I *must* be available, and their contact group will ring full volume regardless of any other settings short of turning it off. Another group will ring in 'normal', vibrate in 'college' mode and vibrate in 'vibrate' mode; whereas yet another will ring at anything other than 'vibrate'.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    5. Re:They should research by Chuqmystr · · Score: 1
      Indeed. I don't know about you but what makes that goddamned ringer truly annoying to me is it is nothing more than a harbinger of the doom which is to follow. That would be the LOUD, often pointless yapping of the human slave of the evil little bits of plastic and metal. I mean c'mon people, why in the hell do you need to imitate someone making a transatlantic call in the 1940's?

      How many of you have been captors on a commuter train with about ten conversations like that going on? Let me tell you, it's just rich because not only must they try to implode the eardrum of the other participant on the far end of the call (who is most likely also loudly yapping away on their cell in a restaurant/theater/church/train near you) but absolutely MUST drown out the sounds of all surrounding mobile yapping competitors. As for the folks who are trying to have a normal conversation with their fellow passengers they rarely stand a chance. I've personally asked quite a few mouthy mobilenauts to keep it down. I mean, if I can hear them despite the fact I'm wearing IEM earphones and the volume around 40-50% on my stereo and they're two seats back, well then, it's definitely time to STFU! God I am glad I almost never fly. It's going to be ugly when VZW et al gets the FCC and FAA to allow for in flight usage.

      Oh, and pretty much every one of the afore-mentioned features are already here for series 60 smart phone users, i.e. many Nokias, Siemens, and those Sony Ericsson PDA things. They are third party apps but they exist and work. One would triangulate your location from tower information and you could assign profiles to locations. It was pretty slick... when it wasn't crashing my old 3650 :-D

    6. Re:They should research by xYike · · Score: 1

      Exactly! Why even have cell phones, why not message via Pony Express or just yell really loud! Why make progress when it was possible to do it in the olden days using another method. Stupid people with their new ideas.

    7. Re:They should research by paeanblack · · Score: 1

      The first step toward making "polite cellphones" would be eliminating the walkie-talkie feature. I've never seen that feature used in a way that did not: make the users shout, make the conversation take longer, accomplish anything that could not be done with a normal phonecall.

    8. Re:They should research by endrue · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right - we don't need no education, we just need a cell phone that will think for us and make common sense decision that we are incapable of. Silly me! I thought that cell phones were for making phone calls!

      --
      I meta-moderate because I care.
    9. Re:They should research by shadwstalkr · · Score: 1

      It's useful in businesses where it's like a long-distance intercom, i.e. people have very short conversations, they don't need any introductory talk, they can reasonably expect the person at the other end to respond quickly. Marketing the service for the general public was just stupid.

    10. Re:They should research by plover · · Score: 1

      Motorolas do this already. They switch to the "loud" profile when they detect charging current. They switch back to your chosen profile when disconnected.

      --
      John
  7. Great by scottennis · · Score: 0, Troll

    So terrorists will now be able to have a cell-phone bomb detonate based on more specific parameters, like, when the train goes into a tunnel. Or, when there's a lot of people around.

    1. Re:Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shut up - if a terrorist can wire up a cell phone bomb he can wire upa not gate and simple latch

    2. Re:Great by muhgcee · · Score: 1

      Yes, let's restrict technology based on what could be done with it. That has always worked in the past...

  8. best research in a while by abenton · · Score: 0

    About time someone did this, so all these peoples phones dont go off in class or the theatre after 15 mentions of "please disable all cellular phones"

  9. But... by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But can it tell the difference between a movie theater and my pocket?

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:But... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Some people never put their phone in their pockets. They have it surgically attacked to their ear.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    2. Re:But... by jrumney · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More to the point, can it tell the difference between my pocket in a cinema, and my pocket in my boss's office?

    3. Re:But... by precize · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's where the artificial butter detector comes in... which should work, unless you keep a lot of that in your pocket, in which case you're probably not the kind of person who minds what other people think of you.

    4. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't both places call for vibration? Perhaps, for different reasons...

    5. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not trying to read the article? They'd already given answer to this, and answer is of course no.

    6. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed it can.

      It is in fact a simple process, first it monitors for the average dampness of the surrounding area, the number of particles of salt per million, and finally the predominant odour.

      It then concludes that it has been placed in a packet of cheese & onion potato chips and reacts accordingly.

    7. Re:But... by somersault · · Score: 1

      that is actually a genius idea :) and when it detects a sweaty fat person sitting next near you, it releases some air freshener.. hmm

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:But... by steve_l · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the same problem that Nokia's context aware cellphone proto from 1999/2000 had. A dark and quiet environment can mean "phone is in briefcase" or "cinema"

    9. Re:But... by sethaw · · Score: 1

      From the article

      the phone relies on a wristwatch. The "eWatch" looks like a big geeky digital watch. But it also has sensors. One measures light, to see if you're in a dark room or watching TV. A motion sensor can tell if you are typing on a keyboard, and a microphone listens in to see if you're in a conversation.

      It doesn't use a sensor on your phone, its in a watch because of the very reason you stated.

    10. Re:But... by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      excuse me?

      A cinema is a dark and QUIET environment? Either what you said makes no sense or you have one hell of a party going on in your briefcase.

      --
      :x
    11. Re:But... by Random+Destruction · · Score: 1

      ...so now the cell phone company knows where you are at all times, when you watch tv, what you talk about, and what kind of pr0n you watch as you.. uh.. 'type'.

      ()

      --
      :x
    12. Re:But... by damsa · · Score: 1

      Only if your boss is really hot.

    13. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is where customized "away" messages come in, umm, handy.

  10. Silent by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2
    even letting callers decide whether they'd like to interrupt based on this information.

    How about no? Letting callers decide whether to override YOUR preferences? That'll work well.

    How about just put the damn thing on silent/vibrate, and leave the rest of us out of your phone call world. I don't need to hear your l33t ringtone.

    1. Re:Silent by Overzeetop · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's some merit to this, actually, though it has certain limits. I'd love to know when I call someone's cell (especially those who have no landline) whether I'm going to interrupt them in a meeting or during a meal. A lot of folks will not put their phones on vibe or silent - some are inconsiderate, some are just forgetful - when they don't really want to be disturbed. When I call, I have a reason - I rarely call "just to chat". I want someone's full attention, and if they are busy, I'd rather get voicemail than interrupt. The flip side is the occasional time I might call just to talk. I don't want to interrupt something important with a useless call. I'll just hang up.

      Then, there's the reason to want forced ring-through. If something happens to a family member, I want someone to interrupt me, whatever I happen to be doing. Even if that just happens to be a vibe when I've got the cell set for silent. If it's serious, I'd rather be rude. I'd probably not give out the "ring anywhere" access to most folks, or put a block in the phone (say, a per-number access level). Likewise, if I have an urgent message, I'd like to make sure the person gets notified of my call.

      This won't fix the problem of rude users who - rather than leaving the room - will take a call anywhere, anytime, and talk at full volume. That's not something technology can't fix (though I would recommend a location-specific bark-collar device for repeat-offenders while they're in otherwise quiet spaces)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    2. Re:Silent by paeanblack · · Score: 1

      It's just like those email systems that allow the sender to attach a priority level. There's always some dipshit in the office who thinks the reminder to not forget food in the fridge is Level 7, absofuckinglutely critical, when more reasonable coworkers are announcing a showstopper bug in a just-shipped product as Level 5, as-least-the-building-isn't-on-fire.

      Caller-determined ring-through would only work well if the receiver can moderate who gets to use it. No telemarketer is going to be told their message isn't the most important thing on earth. Neither are some relatives, for that matter.

  11. Polite is sugestive. by jellomizer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The problem with this is that you cannot take priority of the call. If I am talking to a Boss and say my Wife calls me to tell me she is having a Baby. I much rather have the phone stop being polite and call me. Also there is an issue of guessing correctly, If you are watching a movie in a theator vs. a home theator, with a good sound system. If you want to make the phone polite keep the vibrator on and make glasses (that are fasionable) that have a screen that can tell you who is calling. Don't bother with the AI Crap which will never work right, just go with a HighTech but simple solution.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:Polite is sugestive. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
      If I am talking to a Boss and say my Wife calls me to tell me she is having a Baby. I much rather have the phone stop being polite and call me

      And how often does that happen? A span of a week or so, once or twice a lifetime. I'm pretty sure your boss can handle the possible interruption.

    2. Re:Polite is sugestive. by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well it is used as an emergency, the reson why most people use to get Cell Phones for.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Polite is sugestive. by somersault · · Score: 1

      I would have thought that you'd be making special arrangements around that time, and surely the receptionist could take a message? I think your wife is more likely to phone the hospital if she's having her baby anyway..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Polite is sugestive. by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      Not every such event is predictable. But on those occasions the caller can make extra effort. For example, when I had news of a murder in the family, I called my wife's office and asked her co-workers to tell her to call me back; that's not the sort of thing I would put in an SMS. Prosiac tidbits can go by SMS so I don't interrupt a meeting.

      Many people point out the rudeness of cellphones ringing in unwanted places, but if callers practiced a little bit of common sense, that would help immensely. I have a co-worker whose wife will call his cell phone if she gets cut off in traffic.

      So when pointing out mobilettiquette, everyone should remember to remind people to send messages by the least-interruptive mode that is still adequate for the importance of the message.

  12. In Communist China by nmccart · · Score: 0

    Cell Phones monitor you ...

    wait ...

    Um, you monitor cell ph ... no

    I've got it: Cell Phone tells YOU when to ring!

    --
    Funny sigs make your Karma go down.
    1. Re:In Communist China by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is that like the american phones. When the vibrate goes off people go and pick up the phone and start talking loudly to it. Many times it is far more interupting then the phone itself.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:In Communist China by Y-Crate · · Score: 2, Funny
      How is that like the american phones. When the vibrate goes off people go and pick up the phone and start talking loudly to it. Many times it is far more interupting then the phone itself.

      A lot of people put their phones on vibrate when they go into the movies.

      Only to sit there and have a conversation the moment it rings.

      Needless to say, movie theaters need to have flamthrowers available to the audience.
    3. Re:In Communist China by chphilli · · Score: 1

      Flamethrowers are noisy! Now chloroform-soaked rags readily available to deal with cell phone talkers - there's an idea!

      --
      Please ignore any obvious problems in this post.
  13. Inside my pocket by mpcooke3 · · Score: 1

    It's dark and there is the sound of rattling change.

    Good luck with this one.

    1. Re:Inside my pocket by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
      It's dark and there is the sound of rattling change.

      What? Grues use currency these days, do they?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Inside my pocket by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Always did... mostly as bait though ;-)

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  14. Pocket Watch by clickety6 · · Score: 3, Interesting


    A lot of people use their phone as a watch these days, so it would be nice to have the possibiltiy to turn off the phone functionality but keep the clock functionality. Ditto with phones that have cameras, PDA capabilities, etc. That way you could still use them in aircraft, hospitals etc. without having the problems an active phone are supposed to cause.

    All the phones I've had are either fuly ON or fully OFF with maybe juts an alarm fucntion being available.

    --
    ----------------------------------- My Other Sig Is Hilarious -----------------------------------
    1. Re:Pocket Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's been an Aircraft option on phones for a few years now.

    2. Re:Pocket Watch by NiteShaed · · Score: 2, Informative

      A number of phones now feature "Airplane Mode", which basically shuts off the transmitter part of the phone, and lets you run everything else. As a bonus, I use this when I'm in an area where I know I won't get cellular reception, but I still want to use the MP3 player or camera. The battery life stretches a lot farther, leaving me plenty of power when I turn the transmitter back on.

      --
      Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    3. Re:Pocket Watch by fishbot · · Score: 1

      The new Sony Ericsson W range (W for Walkman) allow you to turn off the phone part so that you can just use the media player, etc.

    4. Re:Pocket Watch by MajinBlayze · · Score: 1

      My phone has an "airplane" mode that allows you to play games, etc. I used this once on a plane, but was still asked to turn it off. The stewardess only understood: It's a phone; needs to be off.

      --
      "Hate is baggage. Life's too short to be pissed off all the time." Danny Vinyard -American History X
    5. Re:Pocket Watch by thelonestranger · · Score: 1
      Ditto with phones that have cameras, PDA capabilities, etc. That way you could still use them in aircraft, hospitals etc. without having the problems an active phone are supposed to cause. All the phones I've had are either fuly ON or fully OFF with maybe juts an alarm fucntion being available.


      My P800 had a flight mode that could be used in areas where cell phones were not suppose to be used.
      --
      To err is human. To forgive is not company policy.
    6. Re:Pocket Watch by praxis · · Score: 1

      Um, my phone, which is now pretty old, has this functionality. I can turn the radio off but keep the phone one so that I can use the PDA in flight, etc.

    7. Re:Pocket Watch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The new RAZR actually has just that. Accordingly enough it's called 'Airplane mode" and silent seems to work fine for all other situations really...

      This research is pointless, I almost always remember to set it to silent and those few times I had to embarassingly apologize for forgetting were enough motivation to not forget again.

    8. Re:Pocket Watch by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

      PDA phones generaly have an airplane mode of some sort. My Treo 650 does that and I know that most any new Windoze PDA phone can switch off the phone options.

  15. Wrong, wrong, wrong by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

    Every time some newfangled crap tries to anticipate and adapt to my needs, it fails miserably. See also: Microsoft Word, Microsoft Excel.

    No thanks. Like a wise man once said -- If you're hungry, eat. If you're tired, sleep. If you have to go... you know... go. Don't expect Hal to catch these sort of things with any degree of accuracy.

    1. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong by aug24 · · Score: 1
      If you're hungry, eat. If you're tired, sleep. If you have to go... you know... go.

      Do not get these in the wrong order... napping in your pizza is one thing, but...

      Justin.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    2. Re:Wrong, wrong, wrong by freakmn · · Score: 1

      ...crapping in your pizza is quite another.

      --
      warning: This post is likely to contain gobs of dripping sarcasm. Consume at your own risk.
  16. How about human politeness by binaryDigit · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems to me that most of the "rudeness" of phones stems from peoples strange addictions to ringtones. I just leave my phone on silent/vibrate all the time, and just never worry about disturbing anyone. It's sad that so much energy has to be expended to deal with such an issue. Plus, many of those strategies sound iffy at best since, for instance, many women keep their cell phones in their purse/bag, rendering any attempt to guage light or sound pretty much useless. Plus, as far as sound is concerned, how many people are going to feel a bit disturbed by the fact that their phone is now ALWAYS "listening".

    That being said I see two useful features (which may have been mentioned in the article that I admit I haven't read). One, simply have the phone check your calendar to see if you have a meeting scheduled. Two, provide some type of "snooze" button. Right now, if you decline a call because you're in a meeting, you still get an annoying beep when they leave a message, or the same damn "ringing" 10 min later when they call again. Why not have a single button basically put the phone in silent mode for the next half/hour/n minutes?

    1. Re:How about human politeness by DudeTheMath · · Score: 1
      Keeping the phone in a purse/bag also renders "vibrate" useless. Okay, you might hear the buzz in an otherwise silent situation, but in a noisy restaurant or on the street?

      On the other side, though, I don't want my boss calling and being told I'm in a movie; does he want to interrupt?

      --
      You save only 59 seconds over 8 miles by going 75 instead of 65. Do you really have to pass that guy? Do the Math!
    2. Re:How about human politeness by Stephen+Williams · · Score: 1

      Right now, if you decline a call because you're in a meeting, you still get an annoying beep when they leave a message, or the same damn "ringing" 10 min later when they call again. Why not have a single button basically put the phone in silent mode for the next half/hour/n minutes?

      Or why not just switch the silly thing off before the meeting? Sure, this does require you to remember to do it, but the snooze button has the same drawback. (You also have to remember to switch it back on again afterwards, which might be a problem if your level of scatterbrainedness is anything like mine!)

      -Stephen

    3. Re:How about human politeness by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      The snoose button is an excelent idea. But it should put the phone at silent mode. Period. No time-out. When the owner get out of the meeting, he changes the mode himself.

    4. Re:How about human politeness by Billosaur · · Score: 1
      That being said I see two useful features (which may have been mentioned in the article that I admit I haven't read). One, simply have the phone check your calendar to see if you have a meeting scheduled. Two, provide some type of "snooze" button. Right now, if you decline a call because you're in a meeting, you still get an annoying beep when they leave a message, or the same damn "ringing" 10 min later when they call again. Why not have a single button basically put the phone in silent mode for the next half/hour/n minutes?

      Better yet, a "Do Not Disturb" feature, that allows you to keep the phone on, see who's calling, but not have to answer it. If the same number tries to call more than once, send it driectly to voice mail and have the phone note the number and times of the calls and display it actively. That way you could have your phone on silent but watch the display for important information.

      Still, most of the time you have this problem, it's rude people, so no amount of technology can cure that.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    5. Re:How about human politeness by garcia · · Score: 0, Redundant

      It seems to me that most of the "rudeness" of phones stems from peoples strange addictions to ringtones.

      It stems from people's strange addiction to using the phone, whenever and wherever they are. The previous poster's assertion that "vibrate" solves the issue is incorrect. It just lessens the initial shock of the phone ringing. It in no way stops them from answering that vibrating phone and then interrupting everyone when they take the call.

      Yeah, there area always times when you "must take a call", just do it outside where no one has to hear you.

      Common courteosy is the best option.

    6. Re:How about human politeness by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      The two most horrid ring tones are:

      1) the latin tango ringtone that I've found only annoying people put on their phones. I'm so scarred by it (or the people I've known to have it), every time I hear it go off I cringe.

      2) The people who've discovered how to "make your own" ringtone by recording a personal message and setting it to be a ringtone. Apparently, it requires you to place the phone next to a very loud AM radio playing some form of popular rock music, hit record, and then setting the ring volume to MAX.

      I have a friend who set a ringtone for any of the Guys to be the dukes of hazzard theme, and for his wife to be Pretty Woman. It's ok, I think, because he KNOWS it's cheesy. I hope...

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    7. Re:How about human politeness by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1
      many women keep their cell phones in their purse/bag

      Well that's just stupid. My mom does that and every time I call her, I have to call twice: once so she can dig the phone out of the bag just as it stops ringing, and again so she can actually answer it. If I'm lucky, as it's ringing the second time, my phone beeps at me, and she has called me back at the same time. It's ridiculous. Just put your phone in your pocket or a belt clip.

    8. Re:How about human politeness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just put your phone in your pocket or a belt clip.

      That's fine unless you're wearing a dress, which often times have no pockets or belts or waistbands.

    9. Re:How about human politeness by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Wow. My Nokia did that in 1998. Things have gone downhill a lot since then huh?

    10. Re:How about human politeness by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. A purse is a very good place for a phone. What's ridiculous is not being able to set a higher number of rings before voicemail picks up. I prefer my phone not to have the attitude of "answer me NOW. Whoops, too slow!" My stupid answering machine does this too... although it does make things interesting when I have to sprint across the house and find it before the third ring.

    11. Re:How about human politeness by ThinkingInBinary · · Score: 1
      A purse is a very good place for a phone.

      Yes and no. My mom's been known to have a tote bag, inside of which is her purse, inside which is a small case, inside of which is her phone.

    12. Re:How about human politeness by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Hard to lose that way. If she can still hear it, no problem. Or are you too busy to wait four or five rings for her to dig it out?

  17. monitoring WHAT? by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 3, Interesting
    monitoring sound light levels to determine

    So your phone is constantly 'listening' and evaluating the sound level.

    Listening to what, exactly? I can see the headline in a couple of years:
    "Your cellphone is listening in to all your conversations"
    And thanks to a new virus, is transmitting them!"

    1. Re:monitoring WHAT? by slackmaster2000 · · Score: 1

      It will probably just monitor SPL.

      Your phone would have to connect to transmit anything. I've actually had this problem on more than one occasion, although it was a flaw in my own programming, not the phone's! There's nothing more embarassing than forgetting to lock your phone and having it speed dial somebody while in your pocket. Especially when you're in your car singing along to the radio.

  18. This ain't new, folks by Radi-0-head · · Score: 1

    I've had several phones and pagers that allow you to set "quiet time", where the phone/pager will automatically put itself in vibrate mode at the times you choose.

    More recently, a Hitachi cellphone I used on the Sprint network had a light sensor that muted the ringer the moment it was removed from a pocket. If left on a desk, the ringer volume would be set lower than if it were in a dark place (i.e. your pocket)

    So, while this is certainly interesting, there have already been practical applications of such technology.

    1. Re:This ain't new, folks by danlyke · · Score: 1

      At the recent Emergening Telephony conference, I've also also seen cell phones that understood calendaring software and information about your contact list, so that if you were in a meeting only close coworkers could ring you, everyone else would get voice mail immediately. Other phones equipped with the same software get a menu suggesting that they IM or email the contact.

      So, yeah, the opening scenario of that article? It'll take a little hunting, but you can have one of those today.

  19. Could this be bloat? by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    This could be the start of bloated cell phones I regret to note. Once these phones are manufactured, cell phone companies will "force" us to upgrade. I won't forget the experience I had last week when I visited a cell phone supply shop to replace a battery for my phone. The man there looked at it and immediately asked, "Where did you get this?" I had no answer for him. Then he told me that my olny solution was to buy a "new" phone yet my phone was bought three years ago and had served me well since.

    1. Re:Could this be bloat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This could be the start of bloated cell phones

      The start of bloated cell phones? You're kidding, right?

    2. Re:Could this be bloat? by Spaceman40 · · Score: 1

      The start? As soon as phones went from calling people and recieving calls to taking pictures (you know how hard it is to get a phone with just call-related features anymore?), phones had bloat.

      It's hard to find a minimalist (in software, at least) phone.

      --
      I [may] disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.
  20. Modes are difficult for users by ewg · · Score: 1

    Having the device switch modes on its own depending on rules that may or may not be obvious to users will be a problem. Technophobes already complain their phones are too complicated: this is step further away from a simple desk phone people have mastered.

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
  21. Common courtesy is not a technology problem. by Murmer · · Score: 0
    "A technical solution may be defined as one that requires a change only in the techniques of the natural sciences, demanding little or nothing in the way of change in human values or ideas of morality." - Garrett Hardin, "The Tragedy Of The Commons".

    Substitute "technology" in for "natural sciences" and "common courtesy" for "morality" here, and you've got a pretty good idea what my view on this is. The name of this miraculous technology is "set to vibrate plus call display". It takes almost zero effort to use. You think people who don't have the brains or manners to do that are going to tell their cellphone when they're going into a movie theater? Or that a light sensor will work when people carry their phones in their pockets, for that matter? Please.

    Try not to be a dick. There's a novel idea.

    --
    Mike Hoye
  22. How about a cell phone with LEDs? by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Just have the phone light up and vibrate as the default, with the ringer as an option?

    Maybe this way it will cut down on the annoying cell music I hear every day?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  23. TMI by LightningBolt! · · Score: 1

    "The Verizon wireless customer you are trying to contact is busy. Based on the motion of his phone and the light level of the room, he appears to be shagging his secretary. Would you like to interrupt and ring his phone?"

    --
    Old people fall. Young people spring. Rich people summer and winter.
  24. My Treo already does these things... by jerkychew · · Score: 1

    Want the ringer to change based on the time of day? Callfilter.

    Change the brightness of the screen depending on the surrounding light? BrightCam.

    Not to mention the nice hardware switch right at the top that lets you choose between silent and ringer modes.

    You can do a lot more with a Treo than your standard phone, but it is nice to see manufacturers building these features right into off-the-shelf products.

  25. Why can't the movie theatre _tell_ the phone by wfmcwalter · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Rather than guessing we're in a movie theatre (which is what this amounts to) or places using cell-phone blockers, why can't someone implement a simple scheme to _tell_ the phone not to ring?

    Of those phones which do ring in an inappropriate place, the owners of the great majority have simply forgotten to turn their phone off (they're forgetful, not sociopathic). Movie theatres, concert halls, libraries and other please-keep-quiet places could have short-range radio equipment inside which sent a "this is a quiet zone" signal. You'd program your phone (and it would come programmed by default) that when it was receiving that signal it would go onto the vibrate-only ring preference. When the signal was lost, it would revert to your default. So when you entered, and when you left, there would be no need to remember to set the phone correctly (the nagging ads always remind me to turn my phone off, but very often I forget at the end and leave my phone off for the remainder of the day). Similarly noisy places like train stations and airport concourses could broadcast a "this is a noisy environment", which your phone would typically interpret to mean that it should use a loud, shrill ringtone.

    There >are Phones should, incidentally, have an "answer with hold" button. So a doctor in the movies whose phone rang (silently) could take it out, notice that it's the hospital's number, and push "answer with hold". The caller would get a short recorded message saying "this person is aware of your call, and will be with you shortly - please hold" - that way the doctor can take the call, but doesn't have to talk into the phone until they've walked into the theatre lobby, where they can take the phone off hold and talk.

    --
    ## W.Finlay McWalter ## http://www.mcwalter.org ##
    1. Re:Why can't the movie theatre _tell_ the phone by wfmcwalter · · Score: 1
      [urgh, should have previewed] Rather than guessing we're in a movie theatre (which is what this amounts to) or places using cell-phone blockers, why can't someone implement a simple scheme to _tell_ the phone not to ring?

      Of those phones which do ring in an inappropriate place, the owners of the great majority have simply forgotten to turn their phone off (they're forgetful, not sociopathic). Movie theatres, concert halls, libraries and other please-keep-quiet places could have short-range radio equipment inside which sent a "this is a quiet zone" signal. You'd program your phone (and it would come programmed by default) that when it was receiving that signal it would go onto the vibrate-only ring preference. When the signal was lost, it would revert to your default. So when you entered, and when you left, there would be no need to remember to set the phone correctly (the nagging ads always remind me to turn my phone off, but very often I forget at the end and leave my phone off for the remainder of the day). Similarly noisy places like train stations and airport concourses could broadcast a "this is a noisy environment", which your phone would typically interpret to mean that it should use a loud, shrill ringtone.

      There are people who legitimately (and quite reasonably) should have working cellphones in quiet places - doctors on homecall, standby emergency workers, out-of-hours plumbers, parents who've left their kids with a teenage sitter. Enabling these people to use their phones sensibly while largely preventing accidental annoyances would be a great (and surely hot difficult) idea.

      Phones should, incidentally, have an "answer with hold" button. So a doctor in the movies whose phone rang (silently) could take it out, notice that it's the hospital's number, and push "answer with hold". The caller would get a short recorded message saying "this person is aware of your call, and will be with you shortly - please hold" - that way the doctor can take the call, but doesn't have to talk into the phone until they've walked into the theatre lobby, where they can take the phone off hold and talk.

      --
      ## W.Finlay McWalter ## http://www.mcwalter.org ##
    2. Re:Why can't the movie theatre _tell_ the phone by MaceyHW · · Score: 1

      Yes, if only someone would develop a standard for devices to discover and communicate with other nearby devices, then integrate this technology into cellular phones. Perhaps some future generation of brilliant engineers will finally solve this problem.

    3. Re:Why can't the movie theatre _tell_ the phone by LeeMeador · · Score: 1

      I'd rather it vibrate in a loud place. I can't hear it above the din no matter how loud anyway.

      But the interesting issue is when a bar with live music is next door to the public library. How does the phone know which of the competing signals to listen to. Whatever they program into it to do would irritate someone. We know that either cell phone programmers aren't all that smart or someone at the company won't let them do it right. Just look at the "features" we have now.

    4. Re:Why can't the movie theatre _tell_ the phone by ross.w · · Score: 1

      perhaps simpler/better to just put shielding around the cinema itself so that no phone in there can receive a signal? That way you are not depending on the phone to be compatible.

      The other low tech device I've seen used in cinemas is a simple slide among the ads that reminds people to switch off their phone. That takes care of the "forgetting" issue and leaves only the "they can't make me so I won't" sociopaths.

      --
      If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
    5. Re:Why can't the movie theatre _tell_ the phone by EarthlingN · · Score: 1

      The quiet zone transmitter has been thought of before; unfortunately, the phones need to support it AND all meeting places need to buy a transmitter.

      How about a wireless standard just for the phones? Maybe one that adds herd mentality. Since most people silence their phones when they should anyway, the few who forget would get a message: "Hey, jerk! Everbody else is in silent mode. Why aren't you?"

      Or maybe something already available. Nearby cell/blue-tooth traffic might be used to determine local phone density, hinting that you're in a theatre situation.

      (BTW - I like the "answer with hold" idea.)

  26. Polite Phones!? How about polite people! by brewer13210 · · Score: 0

    We don't need a machine to be "polite", we need polite people who use them...like people who won't actually answer their cell phones in the middle of a movie in a theater! Who are these bone-heads?

    Todd

  27. really by GmAz · · Score: 1

    So what exactly is the silent and vibrate function for...oh wait, I just figured out the vibrate function. Geez, women get everything!

    --
    Click Click Bloody Click PANCAKES!
  28. That would be fantastic... by JohnnyDoesLinux · · Score: 1

    Now if they could only get cell phones basic features to work better (like signal quality, buttons you can actually press, not locking up) unlike the junky Motorola flip phones that I have (V60).

  29. Scene and Not Heard by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    How about if the phones just ship set to vibrate only, and people have to learn how to turn the ringer on? Make it simpler to turn the ringer on for a one-time ring on the next call, and just a little less simple to switch from vibrate to ring all the time. The dumber people who can't silence their phones when appropriate will be taken out, rather than me taking them out personally when they ruin a movie again.

    A real innovation would be a mode that autoswitches the phone from ring to vibrate on a bluetooth signal. A good phone would authenticate the signal, requiring a senderID authenticated against a third-party DB. Maybe even autoswitch phones from ring to voicemail (or call forward). Then private spaces could control their environment, rather than rely on the politeness of the masses of unsophisticated phone users.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  30. Simple, non-technical solution by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    How about you start charging people who disturb the peace in a movie theatre or another place where silence from the public is the norm? If you get a cell phone call in the middle of a theatre, you have no good excuse to not answer it outside. Sorry, not even having a group of kids under your watch is a good excuse to have a full blown conversation.

  31. Noisy cellphones, 1 advantage by og_sh0x · · Score: 1

    I hate noisy cellphones, I think people are rude for thinking they are so important that they can disturb others' peace. Having said that, there is one thing I wish I had when I keep my cell phone on vibrate: a distinctive vibrate "ring." The only thing I think is cool about ringtones is the ability to customize them so you know who is calling without looking at the phone. If I had distinctive vibrate I could definitely say there is no longer any excuse for a noisy phone.

    1. Re:Noisy cellphones, 1 advantage by laurens · · Score: 1

      Some of the newer Samsung models do this, it's really quite cool. Vibetonz, they call it.

  32. Here's a Thought for Polite Cell Phones by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    How about one that sputters, coughs, and dies verbally "Oh, I'm goin to meet my maker! I love you, Bill G! Tell the wife and microchips I love them!" when I stomp it into the ground after ripping it out of the cell phone user's hands while I'm watching a movie?

    Or how about one that apologizes for ten minutes when it's user talks on it while sitting (not standing, sitting) on the toilet in a public restroom? Especially one that comments on the personal hygiene habits of someone even using a phone in a public lavatory?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  33. Stupid charger by RingDev · · Score: 1

    I leave my phone on vibrate, but I work in a building with radio shielding (we are right next to a major radio broadcast tower). So my phone will often go into searching mode and kill its battery. So I leave it plugged in durring the day. Unfortunately, as soon as you plug the phone into the charger, vibrate mode gets disabled. A royal annoyance.

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    1. Re:Stupid charger by plover · · Score: 1

      Since the building your in has radio shielding, you're not likely to get a call there anyway. So what is the difference between your phone not ringing in "vibrate mode" vs. your phone not ringing in "audible mode"?

      --
      John
    2. Re:Stupid charger by RingDev · · Score: 1

      The difference is whether or not I have a dead phone when I leave the office. On the rare occurrence that a call does come through during the day my cell phone belts out toccata at max volume and there is no option to change it.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    3. Re:Stupid charger by abk_switch · · Score: 1

      Most phones, if you change the sound options while it's plugged into the charger, will remember that mode when you plug it in at a later time. Every Motorola I've ever used has done this for me, as well as the samsung I'm using currently.

    4. Re:Stupid charger by karnal · · Score: 1

      My current Motorola (v551) doesn't keep the setting. Every time you plug it in - Wham, back to LOUD. I've just gotten used to switching it every time I plug it in.

      It does remember to switch back to Vibrate when I unplug it though....

      --
      Karnal
    5. Re:Stupid charger by RingDev · · Score: 1

      My Kyocera just says "Feature Disabled". I've been thinking about picking up one of those Motorola Razors though.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    6. Re:Stupid charger by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Don't. They're horrid. The keypad is uncomfortable, the message dictionary is awkward, and as an earlier reply mentioned, you changing the speaker volume (for calls) switches off vibrate mode.

      I had a Nokia 3510i for a few years, which I replaced with a Samsung X660. Both have great keypads, standard T9 dictionary and silent mode is actually silent. The Samsung even asks you if it should play sound if you try to change a ring tone while in silent mode. Ok, it doesn't have bluetooth, but that's the only feature I kinda sorta miss from it.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    7. Re:Stupid charger by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      On the rare occurrence that a call does come through during the day my cell phone belts out toccata at max volume and there is no option to change it.

      Turn it off and use POTS.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    8. Re:Stupid charger by The+Conductor · · Score: 1
      Does the ringer still operate when a headset is plugged in? Most will redirect the ring to the headset. So if you plug headset (or just an empty plug from Radio Shack) whenever you charge, that will quash the ring, albeit in a hackish way.

      If you really want to hack, unsolder the ringer element, or put on hardware switch.

    9. Re:Stupid charger by hempalicious · · Score: 1

      I like the keypad and have no issues with the message dictionary. Personally, I've never been concerned that it turns off vibrate mode when I change the ringer volume. In fact, if I'm changing the ringer volume, it's probably because I want it to ring. Saves me a step.

      RAZR is the best phone I've had to date.

      My only real complaint is the lack of a minijack for headphones. Bluetooth is great, but it's expensive and not every scenario can be covered (for instance, my motorcycle com system has no bluetooth adapters).

    10. Re:Stupid charger by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      My current Motorola (v551) doesn't keep the setting. Every time you plug it in - Wham, back to LOUD.

      I haven't tried with mine, but would it be possible to edit Loud to something softer (or vibrate) then turn Soft into the loudest setting? I don't have my charger with me to try, but it might work.

    11. Re:Stupid charger by plover · · Score: 1
      I'm not as happy with my RAZR as I was with my Sony-Ericsson T637.

      My biggest gripes are about the Bluetooth stack -- it's buggy and quirky. If I connect to it with my PC, Bluetooth hangs and remains broken until I reboot the phone. It crashed Bluetooth every single time I tried to send it more than one contact from my previous phone. And it doesn't have S-E's "advanced mode" for the headset -- if it's in my car, the Bluetooth remains in session the entire time the car is on, keeping it busy so I can't use the Bluetooth from my Palm to access the network in the car. The S-E would attempt to establish headset communications only when the phone was ringing, otherwise I was free to use the network from my Palm.

      Other minor nits are: slow response times (scrolling in the browser blows), the Address Book doesn't understand the concept of multiple numbers per contact (it creates a full separate contact for each number, but it can "join" them to one name if you find the hidden preference option,) and I can't leave Bluetooth in "discoverable" mode (no fun at lunch. :-) I'm in the process of replacing the browser with Opera Mini, but it's not terribly convenient yet. Oh, and the menus aren't as configurable as on the S-E.

      On the plus side: it's small, has a very readable screen, the camera is quite sharp, and it has good audio. The battery life is pretty good, I think the constant car bluetooth connection is why mine drains faster than my wife's RAZR.

      On the way plus side: it doesn't have a stupid asymmetric keypad like the Nokias. The stainless steel on silicone rubber keys feel weird and are a tiny bit uncomfortable (edge of fingernail on edge of key == grating), but they have been working OK for me. At least they're in the right places.

      --
      John
    12. Re:Stupid charger by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      Good for you, then :-)

      I just tried it out when I was shopping for a new phone, and I absolutely hated it. It does look rather cool, though, and an all-aluminium phone? that's just cool. Too bad I hated everything else about it, because I really wanted to like it.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    13. Re:Stupid charger by RingDev · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the review. My kyocera slider is desent, except the battery life sucks on it. No bluetooth, no camera, nothing fancy. Just a small cell phone that is easy to use and works with my coverage areas. What I need is something rugged and thin. I drive a rather small sporty vehicle with deep seat side bolsters, so anything to clunky winds up catching when I get into the car.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  34. Quiet times by tpr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My motorola flip-phone thingy has this delightful habit of starting to bleep (bleat) about the battery charge level and somehow it manages to work out the most annoying possible time at which to start. Say, 2am or so. It very rarely seems to bleat during tpical wake times.

    Please, Mr Cellphone software developer, give me an option for a timerange when the phone will be silent. Yes, I'm sure I could turn it off but really, what are the odds of remembering? I know the odds of my wife remembering to turns hers back on are about 0 - from long experience.

    1. Re:Quiet times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My razr does the same. Usually it's when I am inside my house where I rarely get a signal. Thick walls, boiler pipes, tall condos all around me, etc. My phone wastes its battery trying to get any sort of signal (at least, that's my theory). It may just be that I used up my battery by the time I get home. Anyway, now I turn it off when I get home. Problem solved.

    2. Re:Quiet times by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 1

      I know it's probably not going to do you much good, but all B&O cordless phones (and the new Serene mobile, I believe) have a "quite time" setting. By default it's set to be quiet from 22:00-07:00. Basically, if the phone knows that it will have an alarm (low battery etc.) in during that time, It will remind you beforehand. Of course, calls will still come through, but if you don't want that, you can always switch off the phone :-P

      I would be surprised if B&O is the only company to have such a feature in their phones. Surely Nokia or Samsung or whoever have thought of some similar?

      --
      Eat the rich.
  35. Its a start by Dr.+Eggman · · Score: 1

    Its a much better direction than those stupid two way radio cellphonamajigs.

    *Beep-Berreep!*Yo, were you at?*Beep-Berreep!*

    I hate those things!

    --
    Demented But Determined.
    1. Re:Its a start by dwayner79 · · Score: 1

      *Beep-Berreep!*WHUUUUZZZZZZZ-UUUUUUUPPPPPPP*Beep-B erreep!*

      *Beep-Berreep!*Chillin*Beep-Berreep!*

      *Beep-Berreep!*WHUUUUZZZZZZZ-UUUUUUUPPPPPPP*Beep-B erreep!*

      *Beep-Berreep!*Watchin the game... Havin' a bud. *Beep-Berreep!*

      --
      Religion and politics, without the flame. godgab.org
  36. Oh noes... by jotate · · Score: 1

    I've come to rely on random cell phones to keep me awake during boring lectures.

  37. My treo 650 by fasuin · · Score: 2, Informative

    already is a polite phone. It can be automatically turned on and off, e.g., during a meeting, and change the ringer volume based on the lighting condition... Just use brightcam http://treoware.com/

  38. Finally! (sort of) by MaceyHW · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been wondering for years why cell phones don't allow you to program ring schedules. TFA mentions this feature in passing as something that's already out there, but I've never seen a phone with it. Is it only in top-end phones, or has it trickled down in the 18 months since I bought my last phone? I should say that I've always purchased mid-range cell phones, I only upgrade when my contract is up or the phone breaks, so I never have the latest and greatest.

    With that one exception, the features described in TFA seem virtually worthless. Is it really worth feeding my cell phone speed and breaking information from my car so that it doesn't ring for the 15 seconds out of the day that I'm breaking hard? Yes maybe some day when my phone already connects to my car and it's trivial to pass this information along, but such a small percentage of cars and phones interact with eachother now that it seems ridiculous.

    Certainly there are some features that could prevent phones from ringing at impolite times, for example, Wired article from like 1998 talked about how this emerging standard called 'bluetooth' would allow theaters and other areas to set up "quiet zones" which you could set your phone to automatically respect and switch to silent or vibrate. There's no need for my phone to have a set of expensive sensors to help it guess what I'm doing at the moment. KISS.

    The real problem with cell phone politness is the user. If people could just remember that answering a cell phone implies that the conversation is more important than what they're doing at the moment, and then stop and decide if it actually is, 90% of cell phone annoyance would disappear. Also, learn to love vibrate mode. /rant.

    1. Re:Finally! (sort of) by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      If people could just remember that answering a cell phone implies that the conversation is more important than what they're doing at the moment, and then stop and decide if it actually is, 90% of cell phone annoyance would disappear.

      Doesn't matter, my bf works in political government and I can pretty much guarantee that any phone call he actually takes on his Blackberry while we are out is more important than anything else going on at the time. But you have Suzy Housewife on an outing who only uses her phone to spout drivel to Betty Stayathome so she automatically thinks his call can't be more important than hers.

      It is.

      If 2 people are on a commuter train and they are having a conversation, would you think they are rude? Now what if it's one person having a conversation on a cell phone? It's a very American phenomenon to think a conversation is only acceptable when the two people are present.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    2. Re:Finally! (sort of) by MaceyHW · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry if my post gave the impression that I don't think talking on a cell phone isn't generally acceptable in public. I certainly enjoy being able to talk during my commute to and from work, and I think that's fine. I also understand that many calls are important and override what a person is doing at the time. I would hope however that your bf excuses himself from situations where his conversation is distracting (say dinner with another couple, or during a movie) to take the call. The importance of his job does not give him permission to detract from everyone else's enjoyment of a public space from which he can easily remove himself.

      Also, there are a few situations where the same conversation that would be acceptable in person but not on a cell because the person on the cell phone can't pick up on the same ques that someone in person can. For example, I find it extremely rude when people people talk on a cell while conducting retail transactions because the person checking out is frequently distracted and slows the process down. It also gives the impression that the person waiting on you is not worthy of your attention. However two phsyically present people talking during the same transaction can easily pause when necessary because both are aware of what is happening. I'm sure an anthropologist can give a better description of what I'm talking about, but there are clearly situations in which cell conversations are not equivalent to two physically present people having the same conversation in the same setting.

  39. Doesn't work for some of us... by everphilski · · Score: 1

    I work in a high-security building and can't take my cell phone in. Vibrating cell phone on my car seat does not make enough noise to alert me if I have a voicemail left by my wife, kids, etc during the day. Otherwise I am very considerate with my cell phone, but I am also very forgetful ... stuff like this is very useful for the forgetful among us.

    1. Re:Doesn't work for some of us... by Al+Dimond · · Score: 1

      If you can't take your cell phone into work, here's an idea: check the voicemail when you get in the car! I don't know what you're hoping for from the technology if you're not even around your phone most of the day. Do you want an automated ringer that goes off every day at 5:30 reminding you to check your voicemail? It's called a damn alarm clock. They make watches with them these days.

      Why increase your reliance on complicated technology when you can easily get what you need without it? And furthermore, if you can't have your cell phone with you for the large part of the day, what's the point of having it in the first place? If you have a 30-minute drive to work all it means is that you get all your voicemails 30 minutes earlier than if you just had the phone at home.

    2. Re:Doesn't work for some of us... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Why increase your reliance on complicated technology when you can easily get what you need without it? And furthermore, if you can't have your cell phone with you for the large part of the day, what's the point of having it in the first place? If you have a 30-minute drive to work all it means is that you get all your voicemails 30 minutes earlier than if you just had the phone at home.

      Well, first off, if the phone is left in the car during the day, why does it need to be on silent? leave it audible and in the glove compartment or something, chances are when you take it out after getting into the car you're going to check the screen anyway. Plus any message that's important enough that it can't wait until you get home, could generally be called into the office and left with the receptionist, left on your voice mail, told to you directly, etc, etc... Anything else can wait.

      Almost makes you wonder how some people survived before cellphones and pagers huh? Makes me miss the days of having to pull over to a pay-phone when a pager went off.

      I have a treo600 now, and -wish- I could shut off the phone while keeping the SMS (for server notifications) on sometimes. Sometimes I just do not want to be disturbed at all unless it's absolutely necessary (like a server going down).. Anyone have any suggestions other than separate devices?

    3. Re:Doesn't work for some of us... by Dionysus · · Score: 1

      I have a treo600 now, and -wish- I could shut off the phone while keeping the SMS (for server notifications) on sometimes.

      Don't know about the treo, but Nokia N70 lets you have different sounds/notifications for each event like phonecall,sms,email. So I could have phonecall and email be silent, while sms gives a beep for instance.

      --
      Je ne parle pas francais.
    4. Re:Doesn't work for some of us... by tzanger · · Score: 1

      The treo650 I have allows you to have different rings for calls or SMS messages, and even different rings per caller-id (based on the number in the address book). I'm fairly certain the 600 does this too.

    5. Re:Doesn't work for some of us... by everphilski · · Score: 1

      Cell phone is cheaper than a landline where I live. Leave it in the car, bring it home to charge, take it to the friends' house so the wife can get ahold of me when she needs me. Sheesh, think in more than 1 dimension. I'm just saying, there are uses for tech like this in ways that some people don't see, but others see quite clearly.

  40. Always thought that this would be a good BT profil by Scyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Silent or something like that. A device could be installed in locations that would try and pair with any bluetooth devices. You could allow the device the first time, and then everytime you visit that location again, it would automatically shift your phone into silent mode. Would be great for meeting rooms & movie theaters.

  41. I See You're Trying To Make A Phone Call by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    From a crowded movie theater?

    Would you like me to Dial 9-1-1 or Check on your insurance?

    Notify your next of kin?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  42. Good Idea; Some Issues by rewinn · · Score: 1

    Your suggestion makes massive sense although of course there are issues. To the extent that a technological solution can be helpful, there are many benefits to letting the owner of a location specify that it is a "quiet place". It can be turned ON or OFF as the situation demands, e.g. after the movie lets out, the theater's CellPhone property could be re-set to "Normal". It could be integrated with the property owner's provision of cellphone signal, to attact customers who want to talk during Normal Time and to have quiet during Quiet Time. I would have concerns that the facility would need some sort of GPS location of the cellphone, to determine for example whether the phone is in the theatre (Quiet) or the adjacent lobby (Normal). There's all sorts of privacy issues there. In the alternative ... I'd love to have a personal cellphone disrupter. I suppose it'd be illegal, but other that little drawback, it sure would be handy to be able to enforce peace & quiet around me.

    1. Re:Good Idea; Some Issues by deadmantyping · · Score: 1

      I think what he meant was that quiet zones would set your phone to vibrate, not keep you from talking on the phone. His point seems to be that many people would not talk on a phone in a theater, but would go outside to talk, but many people often forget to turn their phones off in quiet places, and on the other hand, may forget to turn their phones back on when they leave those quiet places.

    2. Re:Good Idea; Some Issues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not combine the two ideas? Most establishments know when the quiet time will be over! Movies last only so long. Church lasts only so long. When a caller calls, let the owner know by a vibrate so they can see who is calling (so they can step out of needed) and let the caller know when the owner will next be available to call back. (Phone knows this by the establishment telling it how many minutes are left in the movie or in church.) For things that are "gray" like restraunts, just use an approximate time. Heck, you could even let the caller know that the person is eating, call back when they are done, damnit! hehehe.

    3. Re:Good Idea; Some Issues by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      It makes sense to me that Bluetooth would be useful in this scenario. A program runs on your phone, detecting existing bluetooth nodes. Some of them, hearable from the theatre, are labeled 'Quiet Zone' or something. Your phone uses this to change your ringer to vibrate. Imagine the implications for abuse. Perhaps you'd need to carry with you a database of quiet-zones, and just match 'em up...

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    4. Re:Good Idea; Some Issues by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      You can also combine all three. Using Bluetooth, I think you're allowed to send some sort of SMS-type message to the phone (if they're allowed).

      "Hay, you're leaving the theatre. Did you turn your ringer back on?"

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
    5. Re:Good Idea; Some Issues by rewinn · · Score: 1

      >Using Bluetooth, I think you're allowed to send some sort of SMS-type message to the phone (if they're allowed). "Hay, you're leaving the theatre. Did you turn your ringer back on?"

      OK, but take it a step further ... more useful would be a Bluetooth (or whatever) message sent when you ENTER the theater saying:

      DOLT! TURN YOUR PHONE TO SILENT!!!!

  43. synchronous and asynchronous by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the greatest thing about email is it is asynchronous. i can communicate with someone else on my schedule, without my thoughts being interrupted by random claptrap. that's why my first cell phone ever was a blackberry, and before that the idea of a cellphone in my life horrified me. it didn't represent freedom to me, it represented being chained whereever i went. even now, my blackberry is silent, no ring or vibrate whatsoever, i just look at the screen every 5 minutes or so. i can't imagine a life interrupted and ruled by the random claptrap of a cellphone ringing

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:synchronous and asynchronous by dangerz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i just look at the screen every 5 minutes or so. i can't imagine a life interrupted and ruled by the random claptrap of a cellphone ringing

      You can't imagine your life interrupted and ruled by a cellphone ringing, yet you look at your phone every 5 minutes?

      I can easily say that the only time I ever even remember I have my cellphone on me is when it vibrates when I'm at work. At home, I switch it to ringer and it's all normal. I'm not latched to anything. If I don't want to talk, or I can't talk, I simply don't pick up. There's no law saying you can't pick up the phone. If I'm in a meeting, I put the damn thing on silent and it won't vibrate or ring.

      If I forget that I have it on silent, when I'm done work at the end of the day I'll look at it to put it on ringer and see what I missed. Those that are really important know my work number. Everyone else can wait.

      --
      The greatest experience we can have is the mysterious.
      - Albert Einstein
    2. Re:synchronous and asynchronous by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      the greatest thing about email is it is asynchronous. i can communicate with someone else on my schedule, without my thoughts being interrupted by random claptrap.

      And the great thing about a cell phone is, you can get ahold of somebody when you really need them RIGHT NOW and waiting until they get around to checking their e-mail won't work.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  44. Vibrating rin by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    I've always had a problem with vibrating ring in that

    1- you have to be in contact with the phone to feel the vibrations, and I'm a teeny paranoid about microwave radiation & illnesses, so I keep my phone in my bag if I have one, leaving it a few more inches away. Other people don't always have pockets, and people in general miss vibrating rings because they don't feel them.

    2- they aren't that quiet if you've got your phone on a table and it starts vibrating like mad, causing a rattle that's as annoying as some ringtones.

    In trying to come up with a solution, my own idea is to have a discreet wireless (bluetooth) wristband that passes a tiny electrical pulse across your skin to alert you of an incoming call. The tingle would be something similar to the effect of TENS ( http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=tens&btnG=Goo gle+Search )but obviously not enough to stimulate the muscles in the area & therefore cause involuntary movement of the limb :0) Having used TENS for back pain, it's not an unpleasant tingling, and can be scaled down to the point where it just feels like someone's pressing your skin lightly with their thumb.

    It would be a completely noisless alarm that alerts only the mobile phone user without creating any light. The only problem might be powering the device (normal TENS machines for medicine use 9v batteries) & making sure the wearer doesn't look like a complete twit, as is the case with a lot of bluetooth headsets.

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    1. Re:Vibrating rin by Darth+Maul · · Score: 1

      Wait a second. You're paranoid about microwave radiation (which in many studies has been shown to not be an issue), but you want a CURRENT APPLIED DIRECTLY TO YOUR SKIN?

      --
      --- witty signature
    2. Re:Vibrating rin by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

      Hehe, the current *is* tiny, and we understand what electricity does to the body a bit better than radiation. Anyway I only said I was a *tiny* bit paranoid to the extent that i mostly keep it in a bag (which distances it maybe 2-3 inches) and sometimes just keep it in my pocket.

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  45. My cell phone goes to a lot of movies, I guess by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If (as TFA suggests), monitoring the ambient light is an indication of cinema-ness, then my phone, which spends many hours in my coat pocket or in a flap-covered holster, must think I'm the most entertained guy in the world.

    BTW, if they're going to allow scheduled ring times, I think that's great. But (especially relative to the movie scenario) a very short keystroke sequence that says "don't ring for the next 1/2/4 hours" would be used 100 times more often than TOD programmability, IMHO.

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    1. Re:My cell phone goes to a lot of movies, I guess by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      a very short keystroke sequence that says "don't ring for the next 1/2/4 hours" would be used 100 times more often than TOD programmability

      I prefer just flipping the switch on my Treo.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    2. Re:My cell phone goes to a lot of movies, I guess by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I prefer just flipping the switch on my Treo.

      I can also easily disable the ringtone on my LG phone... but my point is that I sometimes forget to re-enable it after the movie (or dinner, or meeting, etc). By having a ring "snooze" control, it will be back to annoying me an hour later whether or not I remember to wake the audible ringer back up and miss some vital call in the wake of some meeting.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  46. Yes, but.. by ackthpt · · Score: 1
    Set your phone to vibrate. It's been working for me for years. Non-invasive when doing anything in my daily routine.

    The major drawback I've found with the Motorola Razr V3 is the volume control also changes your ring volume, so after each call I have to remember to turn it all the way back down to vibrate. Who thought of that?

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Yes, but.. by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Er, man, don't use the "mute to vibrate" feature. I've got a RAZR (as does half the country, or so it seems). Settings -> Audio -> Style -> Vibrate works just fine. As does using the left side buttons.

      Who thought of that?

      You, apparently.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  47. Why dont they just get kicked out by Tweekster · · Score: 0

    That would be excellent if the theater people just simply kicked the person out with the loud phone. with no refund, and it doesnt matter if it is 10 seconds after that "please turn phones off" screen.

    Kick them out, without a refund (they can do that). And who gives a shit about that person not coming back, the rest of the audience will more than make up for it.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  48. Polite phones don't help when people are rude. by jonnythan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    http://www.dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story/0,2028 1,18104683-5001022,00.html

    Seriously, the problem isn't the gadgetry, it's the people who use the gadgetry. In the link above, a woman's cell phone rings in a movie theater, then she whips it out and starts talking on it during the movie. Polite ringers won't do a damn thing when it's people that are the problem.

    1. Re:Polite phones don't help when people are rude. by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      1) Turn around
      2) Tell her to shut the fuck up (yes i personally would use those words)
      3) If she doesn't, go get Manager.
      4) Get her kicked out and get your money back.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    2. Re:Polite phones don't help when people are rude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a nice link, but when the annoyed person made physical contact with the cell phone user, that IS assault and it's as simple as that.

    3. Re:Polite phones don't help when people are rude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is bullshit. Assault? For touching someone's arm to get their attention - something that people have done for hundreds of years?

      Legally, someone might be able to press charges, but that doesn't mean it isn't ridiculous and a waste of court time.

      Face it - America's court system and freedom to sue for ANYTHING have rendered the country a retarded cesspool of ambulance-chasers and professional victims. I'm just thankful I never have to set foot in that craphole.

    4. Re:Polite phones don't help when people are rude. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Texas and I dunno if this is a fed or state law, but touching someone is considered "simple assault". Nobody is going to sue you, but it is a crime. There is a good reason for it. Either way you don't walk up to a total stranger and touch them. If you do, you're asking for it.

      I'm not defending some idiot on thier cell phone at the movies. If you think that's kind of extreme, you should read some of the other laws we have.

    5. Re:Polite phones don't help when people are rude. by jonnythan · · Score: 1

      I don't care about the annoyed person who touched someone else... the entire point was the rude idiot who whipped out a cell phone in a crowded theater during a serious movie and yapped away.

      How the phone *rang* is irrelevant when something like this happens.

  49. Idea for next invention... by corellon13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's invent polite people. Problem solved.

    --
    Do what is right and let the consequence follow
    1. Re:Idea for next invention... by repvik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, inventing polite people would be nice. But polite people are humans too, and humans forget to switch off the sound of their phones.

    2. Re:Idea for next invention... by corellon13 · · Score: 1

      I agree. Though, the problem that this is solving is a non-problem. The occassional whoops is understandable and forgiven by most in society. However, the reason for this "solution" is due to those who are sitting in the theatre chatting away without any regard for those around them. The problem is that most of the people for whom this solution was invented do not possess any consideration or respect for others. IMHO, this feature will not be a "why-buy" feature for those who really need it.

      --
      Do what is right and let the consequence follow
    3. Re:Idea for next invention... by repvik · · Score: 1

      And the final solution is simple. Kill the buggers ;-)

  50. Re:How about cell phone jammers by etully · · Score: 1

    While I would love to believe that we can get the whole world to work together, be polite to eachother, and sing songs and hold hands together, it's... umm... not going to happen. Why should I expect that the masses will buy and learn to use these phones correctly?

    Cell phone jammers are the correct solution for when people don't know how to be polite.

  51. Funny thing... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    Funny thing... All these people complaining about cell phones saying, "just don't answer it." Yet, I not seen a single person ever just let their home land line phone just ring without answering it. So, what is it about the little piece of wire that makes the land line polite, and the cell an abomination?

    1. Re:Funny thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, what is it about the little piece of wire that makes the land line polite, and the cell an abomination?

      Easy. The land line is in your home. The cell is often answered in public places, such as theatres, public transport and restaurants, annoying other people.

    2. Re:Funny thing... by jheath314 · · Score: 1

      The fact that you are unlikely to take your landline with you to the movies.

      --
      Procrastination Man strikes again!
    3. Re:Funny thing... by egburr · · Score: 1
      Location. Land lines tend to be restricted to home and office. Cell phones tend to go everywhere, and in public areas are often quite annoying if not handled nicely. For example, how hard is it to kill the ringer after the first ring (if you must have it ring instead of vibrate in the first place)? My phone does it, and it's one of the cheap "free with a contract" phones.

      I used to answer the phone every time, no matter what. Then I spent a year in a home office and had to train myself to ignore the home phone when I was working. That's one of the best things I've ever done. It was hard at first, but then I figured out there was nothing magical about the phone that required me to pick it up when it rang. That has carried over to my cell phone, too.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    4. Re:Funny thing... by Compulsion · · Score: 1

      We're not subjected to their landline on the bus, in the restaurant, in the movie, at church, etc...

    5. Re:Funny thing... by GlL · · Score: 1

      People got used to the land line rudeness. Think about the comments your grandparents made about the inconvenience of the phone ringing at times they would prefer it not to. Now, as you stated, you hear nothing about it. In twenty years people will have gotten used to the rudeness (My wife's biggest pet peeve is when she is talking to someone and hears the flush on the other end.) of cell phones and they too will be acceptable, and some other piece of inconvenient/overly convenient technology will take the hated place of cell phones.
      The trend that concerns me most is not the technological trend, but the emotional/Psychological end. There is now an expectation of availability. Jobs expect us to be reachable at all times, and family and friends do, too. I have actually started doing a communication fast once a month. I take one day and turn off all phones and my cable modem. I don't even check my snail mail. I always feel completely relaxed by the end of the day.

      --
      I'm a happy pessimist. I expect and prepare for the worst, when it doesn't happen I am pleasantly surprised.
    6. Re:Funny thing... by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      For example, how hard is it to kill the ringer after the first ring (if you must have it ring instead of vibrate in the first place)? My phone does it, and it's one of the cheap "free with a contract" phones.

      Apparently some people don't know about that 'feature'. I was in a restaurant the other night and someone's phone rang, he looked at it, and then put it back in his pocket and let it ring until it went to voice mail. Ridiculous, I can't believe he would be that rude or inconsiderate (or maybe he is!) in a restaurant, I'm -hoping- it was ignorance. Maybe the sales associates should point out the more important features such as hitting the volume button to stop the ringer when you don't want to answer?

    7. Re:Funny thing... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      I've not seen a single person ever just let their home land line phone just ring without answering it

      I do that all the time. So do, I imagine, most people. That's what answering machines are for.

      Another difference is that your landline does not ring in the movie theater, restaurant or other public place.

      Pretty simple, really.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  52. You can have both people and tech being polite. by cerebis · · Score: 1
    Although I do not know why this takes a university group to think about, you can bring both people and technology together to make for a more polite environment.

    Monitoring the environment isn't the way to go. We should be signalling phones to do things, where how much occurs within the phone is dictated by the owner.

    Signal fields which switch phones to a silent setting could still be configurable by the owner, assuming that the range of choices still results in a "silent" phone.

    As for another matter, why the heck do I need to set the time on my phone? Why isn't there a mobile equivalent of NTP on every phone today? How your phone reacts to change in time due to travel, could also be configurable.

  53. How will light levels help in the second case? by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    >monitoring sound light levels to determine if the owner is a movie theater or talking to his boss,

    But what if my boss *isn't* a being of pure darkness?

  54. Just Hold # by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

    I know where I my phone should be off, slilent, or if ringing is okay. My problem is usually forgetting to take the phone out of silent which is okay. On my phone (Samsung SCH-A650) I just hold down the # key to go to silent. I'm not one to spend a lot of time on the phone (unless I would normally on a landline and even less) because it is not a brick. Back before I got the case and I was having an eval out at a school, I sometimes needed to turn the phone off and sometimes forgot if I did. I simply (and discreetly) took the phone out of the holster, removed the battery, and reinstalled the battery which reset the phone to off. If my phone were to ring in an inapproriate place I know how to silence the ringer (either the up or down buttons on the side). If people would have common sense, and more importantly know how to use their cell phones, It would be a better world.

    --
    sudo mod me up
  55. Polite - to whom? by Tom · · Score: 1

    The question for me isn't if these "polite phones" are polite to the owner or caller - but to the bystander.

    There's nothing more irritating than riding in a full train where every minute or so some cell phone goes off - ringer on loudest possible setting, of course - and the owner proceeds to hold a conversation at a volume level he'd never even consider for a face-to-face talk.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:Polite - to whom? by danaris · · Score: 1

      Well, naturally for the phone to learn to be polite by your standards and mine, it has to be taught by someone who shares those standards. Teaching stupid technology to be polite only works as well as the people teaching it.

      If you want to teach stupid people to be polite...I think you've got a much, much longer wait ahead of you. ;-)

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
    2. Re:Polite - to whom? by Tom · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I know that one of those days I'll be to exhausted or angry and a kick to the head will be in order to teach basics of politeness to one of these a*******

      Did I mention I like your .sig? :-)

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    3. Re:Polite - to whom? by danaris · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and I know that one of those days I'll be to exhausted or angry and a kick to the head will be in order to teach basics of politeness to one of these a*******

      *sigh* If only more people would do that once in a while, we'd probably have a much more polite society. A kick to the head can do wonders for negative reinforcement...

      Did I mention I like your .sig? :-)

      Why thank you :-) I figured that since I found it through your sig (back when it said, "Back in beta, too many new features"), putting it in mine might let even more people see it, and join, and have lots of fun :-D

      Dan Aris

      --
      Fun. Free. Online. RPG. BattleMaster.
  56. Why do the phones have to be so noisy? by egburr · · Score: 1
    My two biggest peeves about cell phones: 1) *ring* (pick it up) *ring* (look at screen) *ring* (think about answering) *ring* (answer it)
    2) *bleep* after every sentence
    3) volume control

    My phone has a button that I use to kill the ringer after the first ring as I pick up the phone. It remains silent while I look at the screen and think about if I want to answer or not.

    My phone also doesn't *bleep* after every sentence. I don't seem to have much trouble figuring out when I am finished talking or when the person on the other end starts or finishes.

    It is possible to crank the volume of my phone up to where I can hear it when holding it about 10 inches away. I can't think of any reason I'd want to do that though. It certainly can't go so loud that I can hear it, and often even understand what is being said, from 5-10 feet away. No phone should be able to go so loud, but experience shows that plenty do. If someone is that deaf, they should get a hearing aid; after all what to they do about hearing things when they aren't on the phone?

    --

    Edward Burr
    Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Why do the phones have to be so noisy? by egburr · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I listed 3, not 2, and forgot to go back and change it. Sorry.

      --

      Edward Burr
      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a swimming pool.
  57. I've been waiting for this by QBasicer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been waiting for programmable ring times for a long while. To me, as a student, it just makes sense. I would rather have my cell phone switch between loud and vibrate according to the times I'm in school (so I don't have to try and remember to turn it on loud when I'm walking home, a time when I would never feel a phone vibrating). A day based schedule would work best, with an option in the contact list for an alternative schedule or override.

    --
    x86, oh yes, I'm pro.
  58. First give better user control by bobpence · · Score: 1

    My simple idea: Allow me to set it to meeting/movie/restaurant/polite/quiet mode for a set period; thus I don't need to (remember to) change it back because it will be automatic. I've missed a lot of calls from friends because the phone is on vibrate and sitting on a sofa cushion, ten hours after a meeting for which I silenced it. (And then left it on the meeting room table during the meeting, so that any vibrationss were amplified. D'oh!)

  59. Who is the target market? by phpWebber · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Polite people don't need it. Rude people won't buy it or learn how to use it. Seems a wasted effort.

  60. When vibrate won't work by Whiteout · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've always thought a good solution would be to have a small vibrating device fixed to your watch (say), which would be triggered by your phone (bluetooth or similar). You wouldn't miss any call when the phone's away from you, and perhaps you could configure the phone to ring audibly if it isn't able to contact your (*ahem*) vibrating device. Best of all worlds?

    Andy

  61. Entertainment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the current crop of Hollywood movies, your pocket (and its associated lint) is more entertaining.

  62. I'd be happy if... by rueger · · Score: 1

    ... phones would come defaulted to something like a ring tone instead of an obnoxious midi tune.

    I have yet to hear a musical ring that wasn't intensly annoying. May latest phone, a Moto e815, does not include any "normal" ringtone, just stupid songs and electronic irritations. Thus far I have been unsuccessful in trying to download something better.

    And why can't I just copy a sound file over from my computer and have it work? Is that too much to ask?

    Beyond that, any time someone leaves a voicemail it triggers a beep every five minutes or so, apparently until the end of time, and apparently which cannot be turned off.

    Then again, my previous cel provider (Primus Canada, and boy don't even THINK about using them) used to send a text message every time that a voicemail was left on the phone.

    So the routine became: look at phone, see voicemail indicator, check voicemail, delete voicemail message, see text message indicator, check text messages, see reminder of voicemail that you just deleted, delete text message.

    Again, there was no way to turn this thing off. The Primus drones claimed that the Ericcson phone was sending itself text messages to tell me that there was a voicemail.

    Yah, right....

  63. Rude Cellphone by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    We don't need qa polite cellphone, we need one that's outright rude. "What're you doing taling now, you're driving? ***zzzzap**** ". (High voltage external contacts would be a must)

  64. MOD parent UP! by Anitra · · Score: 1

    This is the best idea I've seen yet. I'd keep my phone on vibrate all the time, but I don't (usually) have a handy pocket to put it in. It's also annoying when I miss calls because I left my phone in my purse or coat pocket after putting them down (like at a party).

    The wristband idea would prevent all 3 problems I currently have with my phone:
    * I miss calls because the phone isn't within easy hearing range, often muffled by a coat or buried in my purse
    * I miss calls because I turn off my phone or set it on "silent" in church or in a movie theater, and then forget to turn it back on later in the day
    * OR I forget to turn off the phone, and get a call when I'm in a quiet environment, much to my embarrasment.

    --

    Have you read the Moderation Guidelines Addendum?
  65. Technical solution to an a***hole problem by BenjyD · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem isn't the phones, it's the morons who use them. I can't get on a bus round here without some group of braindead teenagers watching music videos or oh-so-amusing 'comedy' video clips using the phone's external speaker turned up full. The kind of person who thinks that is acceptable behaviour is not going to bother with a polite phone.

  66. maybe... by penguin-collective · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Researchers at Motorola and Carnegie Mellon University are developing more polite cell phones. Strategies include programming the ringer to turn on and off according to the time of day,

    Maybe "researchers at Motorola and Carnegie Mellon University" should make the effort and head down to their local electronics store to see which of the features they are so busily researching are already available in shipping phones.

    As for the rest of the scenarios, leaving your phone on "buzz" works just fine. In particular, if it's in your pocket, it's silent, when it's on a hard surface, it makes a lot of noise--just what you want.

    1. Re:maybe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a student at carnegie mellon (and someone familiar with the work of the professors described) i can tell you that this problem happens all the time--yet people think they're doing something new when it's really obviously not

    2. Re:maybe... by penguin-collective · · Score: 1

      Well, given that current cell phones already can be set on "silent", "vibrate", or "quiet between the hours of...", the problem is obviously not going to be fixed by adding more user configurable or flaky features to the phone.

      What is needed is a simple "quiet zone" standard that locally broadcasts (RFID, Bluetooth, cell site, ...) that a zone is to be quiet. But such a solution isn't a question of technology, it's a question of politics and business.

  67. Location based knowledge by nairb774 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why not have a feature that if the phone (via GPS, cell towers, what not) knows that you are in a theater or in a *place* then it would automatically change to vibrate or some other defined setting? Just an idea.

    1. Re:Location based knowledge by typidemon · · Score: 1

      Because it isn't accurate. Are you watching the movie, waiting in line for icecream, or waiting to pick up your daughter from the movies with your phone in your briefcase?

  68. It's not even that by LeonGeeste · · Score: 1

    They're basically coming up with algorithms to determine when the phone "should" be set to vibrate. What I want to know is, why are they involving a University for this? Anyone who's used or been around users of cell phones is capable of coming up with ideas on how to make phones go into silent mode. It's probably expensive to hire *professors* to work on this problem, when an engineering firm, or heck, asking high schoolers for ideas, could get you all the ideas you'd need on this. No new technology is needed for this -- just programming software.

    --
    Rank my idea: http://www.sinceslicedbread.com/node/531
  69. Bigger problems... by vorok · · Score: 1
    Strategies include programming the ringer to turn on and off according to the time of day, monitoring sound light levels to determine if the owner is a movie theater or talking to his boss, and even letting callers decide whether they'd like to interrupt based on this information.
    Seems to me that if the person is a movie theater, they have bigger problems than whether or not their cell phone is going off...
  70. um by pele · · Score: 1

    It's called pervasive computing and this subject has been brought up on slashdot about a month ago.

  71. The "Mossad" option by wsanders · · Score: 1

    1) Detect user is in movie theater with ringer activated.
    2) Explode.
    3) Profit!

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  72. The problem has never been the technology. by Oz0ne · · Score: 1

    While, I can't really complain that this sort of thing is being developed, I know it can only help. Still, it's very sad that people need to spend valuable technology r&d time solving a problem of human ignorance/rudeness!

    I for one have not been to a movie in YEARS where I did not hear at least one cell phone go off. Usually it's 2 or 3. I'm somewhat desensitized to where I only get ANGRY when they answer and start having a conversation.

  73. Because it solves the wrong problem. by sc0ttyb · · Score: 1

    I think you're using "forgetful" as a cop-out. What's really the issue here is common courtesy. Manners. Things hardwired into your social (and private) being that almost automatically tell you, "Hey, I'm in a quiet place. I should turn my cell off or on vibrate." As soon as I enter an actual viewing room in said theatre I turn my cell off without even thinking about it. If we can program ourselves to place napkins in our laps, speak quietly in restaurants, and hold doors open for women and the elderly, then making a phone not make noise should be a no-brainer.

    The vast majority of these cell phone issues would just go away if we just used a little common courtesy.

    --
    "Apparently so, but suppose you throw a coin enough times. Suppose one day, it lands on its edge."
    1. Re:Because it solves the wrong problem. by a1englishman · · Score: 1
      I think you're using "forgetful" as a cop-out.

      You know, some people have cells that are actually small enough to forget about? Not everyone is constantly thinking about the blessid thing.

    2. Re:Because it solves the wrong problem. by paeanblack · · Score: 1

      You know, some people have cells that are actually small enough to forget about? Not everyone is constantly thinking about the blessid thing.

      If they really did "forget" about their cellphone, they wouldn't have it on their person in the first place. The grandparent is right...it's not hard to train yourself to perform little things automatically. People who want the convenience of a cellphone but aren't willing to accept the reponsibility are just lazy asses.

    3. Re:Because it solves the wrong problem. by sc0ttyb · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      The size of the phone doesn't enter into it. If you can remember to take it with you when you leave the house, then the same principle can be applied when entering a theatre. Train yourself to be polite (as inconveniencing as that might be to some people), and sooner or later you'll start doing it without thinking about it.

      --
      "Apparently so, but suppose you throw a coin enough times. Suppose one day, it lands on its edge."
    4. Re:Because it solves the wrong problem. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I remember my cell phone in the morning exactly the same way I remember my wallet, my keys, and my watch. I don't think about these things when walking into a restaurant, and I don't think about my cell phone either. I have no idea how I would train myself to turn off my cell phone without thinking of it.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:Because it solves the wrong problem. by a1englishman · · Score: 1
      I remember my cell phone in the morning exactly the same way I remember my wallet

      Exactly! The phone goes in my pocket, every morning, along with the rest of the stuff, because it's always right there. Mornings when it isn't, it gets forgotten.

      I'm not continuously receiving calls on the cell, so it's not constantly reminding me of its presence. I don't go to the cinema on any frequent basis, so there's no routine. Sometimes I remember to silence the thing, but if I'm racing accross the parking lot, after my wife, then it's not on my mind. Nowadays, they often have a reminder in the cinema before the film, and I'll silence the phone then.

      Standard opperating procedure for my phone is to have it on progressive ring: It starts on vibrate, then starts ringing. Half the time, I don't even know it's ringing. A lot of phones don't have to ability to progress the ring. Most people can't figure out how to do it.

  74. why not fix the obvious problem first? by philipgar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The idea of a smart phone doesn't sound too appealing, there are just too many exceptions to rules, and I am generally better at choosing for myself.

    I think before we even get into changing phones so they're smart, why not change them so they're not retarded first? The biggest problem I have with phones is that many of them (the two motorolas I have) beep when you change yourself from "loud" mode to silent. At least when you don't have the phone open. Now what idiot thought up this idea? You're sitting in class, or a theater, and suddenly realize you left your phone on. Now you have to make a decision, do you annoy those around you by having your phone beep at you as you turn the ringer off, or do you run the risk that it might ring.

    Also as other people have said, once it rings and you hit the ignore button, don't beep for a voice mail message, or ring again from the same person etc.

    While people who use their phones all the time are generally better about remembering to turn off their phones, those of us who get a couple calls a week, and almost never during the day often don't think about the fact that they have their phone with them wherever they are.

    Basically, just fix the idiotic notions programmed into cell phones, and then think about smart phones.

    Phil

  75. Priorities by DigitlDud · · Score: 1

    I'd much rather have Motorola make a travel charger that doesn't suck, a WAP browser that doesn't run like shit and crash, and just about half a dozen other ways my phone sucks.

    Oh, and stop making trendy super-thin emo phones that are super hard to hold.

  76. My definition of a polite cell phone: by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

    One with a dead battery.

  77. I can see this coming... by QuebecNerd · · Score: 1

    I can see the MPAA suing over the fact that to know that you're in a movie theatre the phone has to record and analyse the suroundings wich includes the movie soundtrack.

    The case is going to look like this in a few years...

    Title: MPAA vs every cellphone owner in the world who wathed a movie once during the last year

    Alleged facts: Illegal recording of a movie soundtrack

    Offered settlement: 1,000$ per offender or 250,000$ if you go to court.

    They wont even need to make crappy movies anymore just like the RIAA doesn't need to spit out records; they just need to sue their customers!

  78. Ideas for motorola phone improvements by dynamo · · Score: 1

    - Have it NOT shut off and drop all calls just after you plug it in when the battery is low.
    - The phone could stay on until you turn it off, instead of just turning off randomly throughout the day.
    - It could use a low battery warning that does not double the rate of battery drain while the warning is going off.

  79. Typical American technological solution... by mccrew · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This same story was on NPR this morning, and I listened with increasing incredulity to the ridiculous technological lengths that the American tech crowd goes to find a technical solution to non-technical problems.

    There were discussions about having people wear various light and sound sensors so the phone could make an "intelligent" choice whether to ring or not, or going through an extensive training period where the user tells the phone whether to ring or not, and the phone "learns." Like with anything online these days, the topic went to how much private data was the user willing to give up in order to allow the callers to decide whether to make the phone ring or not.

    Hello??? The problem here is that people are thoughtless. No amount of tech is really going to change that.

    This reminds me of that old joke of the difference between the American space program and the old Soviet space program. The Americans spent lots of money to research and develop a pen that would work without gravity, while the Soviets used pencils. Nothing new under the sun.

    --
    Hey, Windows users, there is no such thing as "forward" slash, there is only slash and backslash.
    1. Re:Typical American technological solution... by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      "This reminds me of that old joke of the difference between the American space program and the old Soviet space program. The Americans spent lots of money to research and develop a pen that would work without gravity, while the Soviets used pencils. Nothing new under the sun."

      Yay for urban legends! Especially misleading ones.

      Americans used pencils in space too, the problem is that in the atmosphere, pencils really suck. So the space pen was developed by a completely independent organization which took no funding from NASA and provided pens which in turn was great advertising. The Russians were also allowed to use such pens.

      --
      I don't get it.
  80. Couldn't we just have polite people? by Expert+Determination · · Score: 1

    Compare traveling on mass transit in Japan to the same thing in the US and you'll see there is an immense difference. The Japanese won't use cellphones for voice on the Tokyo subway, say, and even when in the streets they'll use cellphones discreetly. Travel on the BART near San Francisco (or even the tube in London, outside of the tunnels), say, you'll get to hear the ins and outs of the love lives and business lives of everyone around you as people shout the details loudly enough into their phones to overcome the sound of the train.

    --
    "The White House is not an intelligence-gathering agency," -- Scott McClellan, Whitehouse spokesman.
  81. No need to "research" it is done by Polish company by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    If you have a Symbian series 60/80/UIQ, there is "Psiloc extended profiles (Pro)" which changes your phone profile based on time etc.

    http://www.psiloc.com/index.html?id=156

    More interestingly, there is (excellent) innovation by them, named "Where I am" which integrates to this product or used stand-alone

    http://www.psiloc.com/index.html?id=169

    It reads the specific "cell information" and switches to profiles, gives messages, do stuff (can even turn off phone!) based on that.

    Motorola and Carnagie has no access to these pages I assume ;)

  82. ...if the owner... by giantsfan89 · · Score: 1

    "...is a movie theater"

    If the owner of the cell phone is a movie theater, then we have worse problems!

    --
    Don't ping my cheese with your bandwidth!
  83. Security Concerns Maybe by cmansley · · Score: 1

    There is a reason this hasn't been done before and that is security. With complete access to the phone ringer control malicious content could run wild. Check out the original argument by Joel Spolsky here.

  84. Polite cell phone? Bah! by chinton · · Score: 1

    How about polite cell phone users? Turn the ringer off if you are somewhere it would be inappropriate. Don't talk on your phone where it would be disruptive to the others around you. If people have to turn to an engineering solution as a substitute to common sense and courtesy, then we have bigger problems than annoying cell phones.

  85. Audiovox SMT5600 by bradleyland · · Score: 1

    My SMT5600 has something called "flight mode". This turns off all radio systems, but still allows you to use the phones other features.

  86. I didn't hear one ringtone in Japan... by golemite · · Score: 1

    except our own.. couldn't figure out how to put it on vibrate for a few days. Really strange that you're the only one ringing in a crowded subway.

    --
    http://www.s4biturbo.com/
  87. Doesnt my Blackberry already do this? by enantiodromia · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure that after 8pm, my Blackberry doesnt make a sound, and goes to vibrate only. After midnight, vibrate is disabled, except for my Nagios alerts, which are always allowed to wake me up. Nothing new. Move on.

  88. As a computer geek... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the movie theater reminds me to turn off cellphones, I usually ignore it. Not because I'm being rude or lazy, it's just that nobody ever calls me. Did I mention I often go to the movies alone?

  89. Can they turn down the owner when he shouts? by Acetysal · · Score: 0

    It would be nice if they could make the phone turn down the volume of the owner's voice when it gets too high! HELLO!! I'M ON A BUS!!!

  90. The Pocket *gasp* Only two inches away... by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1
    a hip-worn cell vibrating against a Wooden Pew makes a lot of noise...


    Why people wear their cell phones on their belts a mere two inches away from their pocket, I don't know. Is it to advertise to the world that they're important? Is it to scream "look at me, I have a Blackberry"? Is it so that people around them know that they answer their phone just so often that that two inches adds up to miles of extra movement over the course of a given year?

    -M
    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
    1. Re:The Pocket *gasp* Only two inches away... by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 1

      I used to hate the hip holster cell look too, but now I sport it. Because men (In America) don't carry purses, we have to have a place to put our phones. When wearing a jecket, the pocket is a good solution. But when wearing a shirt and slacks, the hip is the best place for a phone- (can't go in pants pockets because it is too bulky- unless you wear baggy pants to work, which would be a career killer in an office job.) Can't hook the phone on the back of the pants, because it would interfere with sitting. Cant wear in in the front, above your zipper, because it would interfere with sitting also, as it would dig into your pelvis/stomach when sitting. Hence the hip, above the pocket, within easy reach is the best option.

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    2. Re:The Pocket *gasp* Only two inches away... by recursiv · · Score: 1

      Slow down there.

      Maybe it's because they find bulky objects in their pockets physically uncomfortable. I know I do. It's probably not a conspiracy. You're analyzing too much.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    3. Re:The Pocket *gasp* Only two inches away... by angle_slam · · Score: 1

      When you're sitting down, retrieving your phone from the hip is ten times easier than getting it from your pocket.

  91. Signalling... Not Scheduling by PhYrE2k2 · · Score: 1

    It would be neat to see signalling in major centres (thinking of a big DoS conspiracy though). A device in a movie theatre that signals all phones to not ring or to be dimmer when they are opened during a movie. Walking away from this device will turn it off. It's like the 'anti-cell phone' blocking devices, but doesn't inhibit service... it just enforces politeness.

    Similarly, in a hospital, it should do the same, or near an MRI machine turn off the wireless. These things are all neat, but a schedule is a bit much. Who geoes to the movies that regularly? Who goes to sleep at the same time every day?

    -M

    --

    when you see the word 'Linux', drink!
  92. The ultimate solution by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    The ultimate solution to this involve the application of Bayesian-based... ((ring ring)) Hold on. Yeah, I'm talking to slashdot. No, nothing serious. I'm good, how are you? No, I don't think we more bread. She said WHAT? Wow, ok, I think you'll need to give Steve a call and let him know that our plans for Saturday need to change. No, I said Steve. STEVE. S - T - E - V - E. Yes. No I haven't filed taxes yet, but I did order the Michigan module for TurboTax. Yeah, 4-6 weeks, but it's usually a lot faster. Yeah, I can wait while you let the cat in. I said YEAH, GO AHEAD. I'LL WAIT. So anyway, did you have a chance to wash our dark laundry last night? No, I can get that on the way home. So what about...

  93. Cell phone service needs a "secretary" mode. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The engineer in the article is over-analyzing the issue. Putting smarts into the phone is the wrong step. The smarts are in the heads of the caller and callee, we just need ways of modifying the operation of the device.

    I have asked cell phone providers for the following feature for years. All I have gotten from the sales people are blank stares of incomprehension when I did this.

    I want a toggle button that switches the phone between two modes. Mode one is normal - the phone rings or vibrates or whatever when someone calls me. Mode two intercepts the call with a message - "I am busy doing something important right now, to leave a message, please press one or just stay on the line, to interrupt me right now during my important task, please press 2." If you want to get fancy about it, you could have multiple buttons or whatever that would play different messages: " I am in a meeting", "I am at church", "I am at a movie", etc. If they don't press two, my phone never rings (or vibrates), and they have the option of leaving a message. If they press two, the phone rings, right now.

    That way, when my wife calls to ask me to pick up milk on the way home from work, she'll just leave a message. When she calls from the ambulance on the way to the hospital because my daughter just suffered a life-threatening injury, she'll interrupt. I don't care if I'm giving a presentation to the CEO of the company, I WANT that call, and will interrupt whatever I'm doing to take it.

  94. Texas by DaFallus · · Score: 1

    I read an article and heard on the radio this morning about a woman who answered her cell phone in a movie theater and began to have a conversation. Another woman in the theater reached over and tapped the shoulder of the woman on the phone and asked her to be quiet or go outside. When this happened, the woman on the phone called police and accused the woman who tapped her of assault. Now the woman and the courts have to waste time dealing with this. I believe this happened in Brownsville, Texas.

    I honestly cannot believe the number of times I have seen people answer their phone during a movie and attempt to carry on a conversation in a packed theater. The balls/arrogance of these people just amazes me. I personally believe that all movie theaters should automatically block all cell phone reception as soon as the previews begin to roll, or send a self destruct sequence to any phone with an audible ring during the movie. If you can't handle not being able to use your cell phone for 2 hours, then wait till the movie comes out on DVD. With all the selfish assholes on cell phones, irresponsible parents bringing crying infants into rated R movies and allowing toddlers to roam freely throughout the theater it is no wonder why I stopped going to the movies.

    On a somewhat related note, I've noticed that restaurants are starting to have designated cell phone areas. This is a relatively new practice, at least in Houston. I hope more businesses start adopting these policies. Now if we could just get designated family/children areas (a la Simpsons) I would be in heaven.

    --
    No one cares what your captcha was

    Houston TX, USA
  95. The real issue is the jerks by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    The real issue is the jerks who choose to be jerks. Not the people who forget to turn off their ringers, but the people who just don't give a shit. Load up the most obnoxious ringtone possible (it gets so hard to calculate that, since they're all obnoxious), head on down to the movies and take a few calls. Oh, is this bothering you? "Somebody Else's Problem" effect.

    Perhaps movie theaters could be retrofitted with Faraday cages...

    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  96. all it will do is keep honest folks honest. by Darth+Liberus · · Score: 1
    A good idea, but let's face it - the people who will actually bother to set up and USE this feature are the same ones who already (usually) remember to turn off their phones or set them to vibrate.

    Personally I'd like this feature just to save me from those moments when I forget to switch modes. It's rare but it does happen.

    --
    Beauty is just a light switch away.
  97. One step further by trjonescp · · Score: 1
    I like that they are finally adding features like these in phones. Some say, "Just turn off your phone when you are in a movie or meeting" Of course, it would be nice if we could always remember to do that. The problem is that even if we forget 1% of the time, there is a high probability that at least one or two people in a theater with 200 seats forgot.

    I think phones should take advantage of bluetooth by listening for a 'silencer' signal that is broadcast over bluetooth to phones withing some loosely defined radius. Then you can set your phone to listen to this 'silencer' signal and take some user-programmed actions such as "turn off ringer" or "switch to vibrate" upon leaving the silent zone, your phone would just go back to whatever mode it was in previously. Theaters, classrooms, conference rooms, whatever could be equiped with a simple little device to help people remember to do what they are already are trying to do but sometimes absent mindedly forget.

    (I know they are already using a dumber version of this in some Canadian theaters... it just kills the signal, which would be very annoying if you wanted to receiver emergency calls via a vibrate alert)

    --
    Only speak when it improves the silence.
  98. Re:How about cell phone jammers by yawn9 · · Score: 0

    Cell phone jammers are a rediculous idea. If someone has an emergency and needs to get a hold of me, I don't want them to be unable to be able to because some insensitive prick is running a jammer near me. I will, however, advocate the jamming of ones fist into a rude cell phone user's face, or even a foot into an ass.

  99. how do you deal with email? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i'm just saying i deal with my cellphone like i deal with my email. which actually is a mismoner, because all i use my blackberry for is texting and email. i probably do 2 calls a month. anyone important to me knows to email or text me instead of calling, including my gf and employers. even my mom has taken to sms and now uses it with my sisters, due to my influence

    i just don't deal with calls ever. as for your glorious ringtone management: have fun managing that. i just think it's easier never to have to manage it at all, ever, or think about a ringtone ever. and i think as time goes on, more and more people are going to operate like me. the idea of a phone ringing, and us rushing to the phone is from another century. a cellphone with a ringtone is just an anachronistic holdover form that era

    more people will be like me, as more people realize that true freedom is not with a cellphone, but from a cellphone

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  100. How about "emergencies only" mode? by Nerdposeur · · Score: 1
    I can manage my phone's noise with vibrate, thanks. But it would be nice to have the phone equivilent of a "do not disturb" sign. I'd put it in this mode when I went to bed, for example. A caller would get a message saying "Nathan is sleeping; press 1 if this is really really important and you need to wake him." That way emergency calls could still get through.

    If you've ever accidentally awakened someone, you'd appreciate this feature from the calling end, too.

  101. What about blocking numbers? by Catcher80 · · Score: 1

    A cell phone that has the option of shutting the ringer off at night is something useful, and the idea of a cell phone that can determine you're in a dark place and shut itself off is neat. I imagine it will be super expensive though--I mean, my cell phone gripes if I have more than 30 text messages saved, I can't imagine a phone doing all this costing near as much as the cells that don't.

    I've always wanted a cell phone that could/would block a specific number somehow. Why not? I have annoying people call me that I sure didn't give my number to them (or I regret doing so...). How about a section of the contacts/address book for phone numbers we want to ignore? Where's the phone that only takes calls from people who are actually saved in your phone? Cell phones are obviously going to be around for a long, long time. We have the technology, it only makes sense to make them better and extremely useful to us in everyday life (if you choose to use these features, of course..)

    --
    I sell out to The Man every day.
  102. Time of Day sensors! by audiodude · · Score: 1

    This is seriously useful! If I have class every day from 2-4 PM, why should I always have to manually turn my damned ringer on and off? Where was this 8 years ago?

  103. huh? by name*censored* · · Score: 1
    ...letting callers decide whether they'd like to interrupt based on this information."

    .......Has anyone else noticed the paradox there? Surely to ask you if you don't mind being interrupted, it'd have to interrupt you? :|

    Also, it seems to me that the kind of people who would buy a "polite" cellphone (or conversely if they become mainstream, bother programming times in) are the kinds of people who switch their cells to "silent" or "off" during movies. The jerks out there are still going to recieve loud calls in the cinema and hold up traffic for their conversation, even if this does become popular

    --
    Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
  104. Luddite! by Bit_Squeezer · · Score: 1

    Why do I need bluetooth to sync my razr when I could scribe a piece of papyrus? LOL

  105. What's the point? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Meetings etc never seem to run to schedule so what's the point of going through all the pain of trying to link your phone's ringer to your calendar?

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  106. I wonder. . . by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1

    How good would this "polite" cellphone be if it belonged to a doctor or someone else who had to be on-call all the time?

  107. Scheduling vibrate mode by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

    Some other /.er mentioned Nextel phone(s) had this capability. I'll have to look that up. Cause I would love that. Currently I have my phone on vibrate as to not disturb my coworkers. When I leave the office I should remember to turn on the ringer, but sometimes do not. Have missed some calls that I should have answered. Contribute it to old age or whatever, but scheduling the ringer type on a daily or weekly basis would be a huge convenience to me.

    I also like the idea of putting the cell phone in a 'do not disturb' mode. The caller gets shunted to voice mail immediately without the phone ringing at all. It would be nice if the the caller could hear a pre-recorded message for this mode. /off to do research

    -FlynnMP3

  108. The person you have called.... is.... by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
    Engaging in mad passionate sex with 3 members of the opposite sex. Would you like to interrupt? Yes

    Are you sure? Yes

    Are you really sure? Yes

    You are a cruel person... interrupting....

  109. It is called evolution you ape. by xYike · · Score: 1

    Computers originally performed numerical calculations. If you've been following along, we now use them for a little more than just that. Sorry - most can't simply freeze innovation and use cell phones for making phone calls.