Slashdot Mirror


Tree Climbing Robot

galactic grub writes "New Scientist's new Tech Blog has an article about a remarkable, if slightly creepy, tree-climbing robot being developed by robotics experts from Carnegie Mellon and several other US Universities. The article comes complete with a video clip of it going up several different surfaces."

143 comments

  1. Great... by danpsmith · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...now where am I gonna hide when the robots attack...

    --
    Judges and senates have been bought for gold; Esteem and love were never to be sold.
    1. Re:Great... by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...now where am I gonna hide when the robots attack...

      In a cavernous underground layer of course! Don't you watch movies?

      You don't really have to worry anyways, they dont want to hurt you they just want to use you as a power source.

    2. Re:Great... by Somegeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hi Shania!

      I must admit that I've always thought that you were really cute and that I would love to meet you, but I find I'm somewhat put off by your lack of knowledge about our language, and unfortunately, what it says about your level of education. I realize that you kept hearing a word in the movies and it sure sounded like 'layer', but you were actually hearing a completely different word; 'lair'. Wacky huh?

      --
      And as you tread the halls of sanity, You feel so glad to be, Unable to go beyond. I have a message, From another time..
    3. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ew bugs.

    4. Re:Great... by greenegg77 · · Score: 1

      That, my good geek, was the absolute best!

      --
      --- This .sig for sale - $500 OBO.
    5. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've known a few guys who thought they were pretty smart
      But you've got being right down to an art
      You think you're a genius--you drive me up the wall
      You're a regular original, a know-it-all

      Okay, so you're a grammer nazi who understands homophones
      That don't impress me much

      -- Shania

    6. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so you're a shallow little drama queen who just wants to get sleep with other stupid models?

      That doesn't impress me much either.

      -- Anonymous Rocket Scientist

    7. Re:Great... by Mahou · · Score: 2

      you forgot to mention that 'anyways' is not a word.

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    8. Re:Great... by the.o.ster.66 · · Score: 1

      It's time you thought about Old Glory Insurance.

    9. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "grammar," butt nugget.

    10. Re:Great... by Ben+Jackson · · Score: 3, Funny
      How ironic!
      I must admit that I've always thought that you were really cute and that I would love to meet you
      Of course what you really want to do is meat her.

      (I was really torn between that and suggesting that, like the original poster, you wanted to layer...)

    11. Re:Great... by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

      Soon the men will put down all trees in the world, and these robots will be driven to extintion due to the destruction of their natural habitat.

      Oh, wait... I just RTFA and saw the video, they don't just live in trees.

      OH GOD, WE ARE DOOMED!!!

      --
      So say we all
    12. Re:Great... by somersault · · Score: 1

      sure it can climb trees, but all you need is some stairs. It worked for Dr Who..

      --
      which is totally what she said
  2. So, what happens when it gets stuck? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do I have to call the firemen or tech support?

    1. Re:So, what happens when it gets stuck? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tech support will tell you to phone the firemen, and the firemen will tell you to go to hell.

      I'd suggest investing in a good ladder.

  3. Still can't beat the japanese by ravee · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Japanese are the leaders in creating robots.

    --
    Linux Help
    for all things on Linux
    1. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by MaWeiTao · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why exactly do you say that?

      Sure Japanese have developed some impressive robots, but I wouldn't call something like the ballroom dancing robot a great feat of technology. Japanese designers seem to go for flashy robots, putting immense effort in creating something that has little practical utility but creates quite a stir. One company developed a humanoid robot and then we see dozens of companies cloning the original concept.

      The ones developed in the US and Europe tend to be developed for real world applications. They don't look pretty, but they get the job done, solving a specific challenge in the process.

      Not to discredit what the Japanese are doing, as they certainly are innovating too, but there's no reason to put down this work just because it doesn't look like Honda's ASIMO.

    2. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by bermudatriangleoflov · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They seem to make useless ones, however. An example being a robot that kicks a soccer ball or plays ping pong. Thats great and all, but a robot that can:

      1. Disarm a bomb
      2. Climb a tree
      3. Drive cross country without a driver
      4. Recognize the expressions on a human face

      all seem to have more real world applications and were developed right here in the US. Real world applications will drive the technology and funding for practical and useful robots IMO.

    3. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by Geak · · Score: 0

      Obligatory Quote:

      ALL YOUR TREES ARE BELONG TO US!!!

      But it would be interesting to see an AIBO devour a cat stuck in a tree.

    4. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by PitaBred · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, the AI lessons in making a robot react CORRECTLY to a ping-pong ball have absolutely no relationship to things like #3? They're solving 'problems' while gaining massive leaps in understanding. Even if their end result isn't immediately useful, the lessons they learn from it are.

    5. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by mopslik · · Score: 5, Funny

      5. Find Sarah Connor.

    6. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by Anthem.uxp · · Score: 1

      I see your bomb-disarming, tree-climbing, cross-country-driving and expression-recognizing bot and raise you a hundred japanese grenade soccer bots. Let's see who wins this round :)

    7. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by bermudatriangleoflov · · Score: 1, Funny

      A robot that can kick my ass in tennis will still not necessarily "understand" that it has kicked my ass :)

    8. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are kidding, right? Think about the movement required for a SIX-legged robot to climb a tree and the kind of AI you'd need for this to occur. Now, keeping that in mind, go see Asimo run.

      This kind of nonsense shouldn't be tagged insightful.

    9. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by PFI_Optix · · Score: 1

      The bomb-lobbing cricket-playing robots, of course.

      --
      120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
    10. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by 2names · · Score: 2, Funny

      FWOOP!

      --
      "I'm just here to regulate funkiness."
    11. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heard of Flamebait? (Or had you heard gullible was removed from the dictionary?)

    12. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by Vapon · · Score: 1

      Little practicality? I can see quite a few uses for a robot that can climb vertical walls and trees, that is small enough to go inside vents etc,,,

    13. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Ha-ha. Sorry, by "they" I meant the researchers, specifically the Japanese in this case ;)

    14. Re:Still can't beat the japanese by Schmendr1ck · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually, I *would* call a ballroom dancing robot technologically impressive. It is very difficult to accurately mimic human physiology and movement in a robot. We consider walking on two legs to be simple (and for most people it is), but it is very challenging to develop robust bipedal movement in an artificial system, either real-world or simulated.

      The difference between a bomb-disarming robot and a ballroom dancing robot is that the former is focused on practicality, while the latter is focused on showcasing innovative technology in a non-practical (and arguably whimsical) manner.

  4. Didn't the movie "Runaway" teach us anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Little robots like that will eventually be embedded with chips that will make them into killing machines.

  5. Ear-creature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the ear-wig creature from Star Trek II. Yummy!

  6. ObHHGG... by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great, robots have beaten humans to the realisation that it was a bad idea to come down out of the trees in the first place.

  7. Creeping Tom by digitaldc · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously such a robots could have plenty of useful applications, in search-and-rescue and space exploration, for example. But presumably it could also help you reach those really hard-to-prune branches.

    Or put a moveable camera on its head, make it climb your neighbor's house, and you will have the perfect 'Creeping Tom.'

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  8. Kill them now... by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 4, Insightful

    while you still can.

    1. Re:Kill them now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderators, please stop being paranoid an mod parent funny.

      You're giving me the creeps.

  9. Awesome! by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a wonderful robot, I think we should have them everywhere just for the heck of it - climbing towers, trees, buildings, bridges, just running around everywhere. Man, that is a GREAT IDEA. We need more climbing robots.

    1. Re:Awesome! by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      Please go stand by your stairs, so I can protect you.

    2. Re:Awesome! by TapeApe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, this does look to be a pretty good thing. Now if they can just shrink it down to, say, the size of a mouse or a gerbil, my days of threading network cable through walls and ductwork will be FAR simpler!

      Always thought it'd be ideal to have a little robot to do that dirty work. I've had a heck of a time training real mice and gerbils to climb walls for me. They'll climb all right, but won't go where I want 'em... and they get downright hostile if I try to attach Cat-5 cables to their tails.

    3. Re:Awesome! by somersault · · Score: 1

      now why did you have to go and tell them that it was 'cat' cable? Maybe if you told them the 5 was for 5724n613?

      --
      which is totally what she said
  10. This is just what we need by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...for when NASA launches a probe to Endor.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:This is just what we need by somersault · · Score: 1

      I wonder if it would be of any use in a probe for Uranus..

      *tumbleweed*

      --
      which is totally what she said
  11. Anyone remember the TNG episode... by 8Complex · · Score: 0

    The one where those creatures (shaped just like these robots) hosted themselves in the human bodies and took them over completely? That is really scary looking.

    On a side note, it is very cool that it can do it, but DAMN are they slow.

  12. Is your time worth $2700 a minute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It would be nice if submitters would warn people when Flash is required so those of us who don't bother with that nonsense wouldn't waste our time.

    I opened up the article, and read the brief blurb -- about 45 seconds.

    I clicked on the YouTube link in the article, and saw the little Flashblock icon. I closed the window. Time -- about 5 seconds.

    Are you really that upset that you lost less than a minute? Your stress level must be through the roof if you're so busy that you can't lose a minute, less than 5 seconds of which are actually spent identifying the Flash video.

    1. Re:Is your time worth $2700 a minute? by eric_brissette · · Score: 1

      Yes, and I would like a notification when any story uses includes css, javascript, images, flash, embedded movies of any kind, or frames (inline or otherwise).

      Seriously though, Flash Video (FLV) really is a pretty good video codec for the web. I'd take it over RM, WMV, or MOV any day.

  13. *ring*ring*ring* by mblase · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Hello, Midville Fire Department."
    "Yes, I need you to get my... my pet out of a tree in my yard, please. It's stuck."
    "Certainly, ma'am. Is it a housecat?"

    "Well, no.... I'm a little... I don't know how to explain...."
    "That's okay, ma'am. A bird, then? Cockatoo or a parrot?"
    "Well, it's not exactly like that...."
    "A gecko? Iguana? We've done iguanas before, there's nothing to be embarassed about."
    "Actually, um... it's a robot."
    "A robot, ma'am?"
    "Yes, my husband was demonstrating this six-legged robot he's been working on at the university for the last year and he forgot to program it to come back down... hello? Hello?..."

    1. Re:*ring*ring*ring* by qzulla · · Score: 2

      911 call:

      Please, I need you to get my cat down from the tree. It'll starve!

      Hang on, m'aam. Have you ever seen a cat skeleton in a tree? .... no...

      Don't worry. It will come down when it gets hungry.

      qz

    2. Re:*ring*ring*ring* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BANANAPHONE!

  14. Re:Flash required by Sabaki · · Score: 1

    I was just talking about Runaway yesterday when I was watching footage of another creepy robot.

    Welcome to the future!

  15. Re:Flash required by Eightyford · · Score: 1

    It would be nice if submitters would warn people when Flash is required so those of us who don't bother with that nonsense wouldn't waste our time.

    Flash is the new video format. The summary says it is a video, so what formats should you be warned about? Just flash?

  16. Tree climbing robot for space exploration! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If tree climbing is a usefull skill for space exploration I feel NASA may have been keeping somthing from us!

    1. Re:Tree climbing robot for space exploration! by XenoRyet · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Climbing a vertical surface shares similarities with clinging to an astroid with very little gravity, both can be bad when you let go.

      --
      If forums teach us anything, it is that logic and critical thinking should be required courses in the public schools.
  17. Transportatation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it might be useful to build a larger version of this for bringing people up the sides of buildings where the stairs are wrecked and there is no elevator, or certain mountains or towers.

    Okay maybe not THAT useful, but still..

    1. Re:Transportatation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um You might wish to consider bringing people down from buildings with collapsed stairs and no elevators Instead.

      Bringing additional people in could subject you to liability and all kind of "how was I to know the building was about collapse on everyone's heads" conversations...

  18. A tree climbing robot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the old joke about the man-eating chicken. I read the headline and thought "they have a tree that can climb a robot? WOW."

  19. Our new overlords by pilybaby · · Score: 1, Funny

    Personally I welcome our new tree climbing mechanised overlords

    1. Re:Our new overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is getting hard to follow, can we stop switching Overlords every 4 hours?

    2. Re:Our new overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're going to flog a dead horse, at least quote it verbatim. I, for one, am fucking sick of that line, which wasn't even funny in the original Simpsons episiode.

    3. Re:Our new overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one, actually thought it funny. Just 'cause you're sick of a running Slashdot gag doesn't mean all of us are.

  20. Re:Flash required by stanmann · · Score: 1

    Flash is a video format in the exact same way as WMF is an image format, they are container objects, most commonly used to hold that sort of data.

    --
    Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  21. Re:Flash required by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
    Flash is the new video format.

    And that's the problem right there. There is no need to embed videos using flash. Stick up an mpeg file and let whatever program the person wants to display the video. The summary says video and I'm thinking QT, WMV or the aformentioned mpeg. Not Flash.

    It was/is bad enough that some moron thought it would be a good idea to use Flash as the main page of a web site thus blocking people who use screen readers from accessing the site. Now they seem to think it's easier to take an already existing video format and redo it so it can be run in a different format.

    Besides, Flash is one of the easiest ways for people to get spyware on their system. Simply telling people to get X product to block Flash when they have a hard enough time just turning their computer isn't a good enough answer.

    At least when I submit stories I warn people if the article is in pdf format or a registration is required. It's not too much to ask that people be warned if Flash is required.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
  22. Follow up by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Any kid knows that getting up is easy, but getting down is much harder. How have they faired on that?

    --
    If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
    1. Re:Follow up by SEWilco · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gettind down is easy. It's putting it back together that is the hard part.

    2. Re:Follow up by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Funny

      Any kid knows that getting up is easy, but getting down is much harder. How have they faired on that?

      Well the fineprint does say to call a doctor if it stays up for more than 4 hours.

      --
      He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    3. Re:Follow up by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Putting it back together is easy, explaining to your wife that she can't use the kitchen table for three days... that's the hard part.

      I think I've taken that line of thought to its logical conclusion.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    4. Re:Follow up by Isotopian · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not quite... being able to build and repair a tree climbing robot in three days is easy... getting a wife is the hard part.

      --

      It's poetry with a beat behind it! And guns! They're like beatniks with automatic weapons.

    5. Re:Follow up by Niten · · Score: 1

      Actually, check out the YouTube video linked at the bottom of the article. In one of the segments, you can see the robot traverse a slalom of obsticles on its way up a wall. It actually seems to backtrack a little down the wall at each turn...

    6. Re:Follow up by somersault · · Score: 1

      getting a wife is easy, teaching her English and keeping up your repayments is the hard part

      --
      which is totally what she said
  23. From the makers of BigDog by Gedalia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is another robot built by the guys at Boston Dynamics http://www.bostondynamics.com/. The robotic pack mule that they built ( BigDog ) was linked to last Friday. http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/03/ 04/0240246

    There's also Rhex a six legged waterproof go anywhere robot.
    more info at http://www.bostondynamics.com/content/sec.php?sect ion=robotics

    1. Re:From the makers of BigDog by BecomingLumberg · · Score: 1
      There's also Rhex a six legged waterproof go anywhere robot.

      Yeah, but in that case I would prefer to use a Shark!

      If I have to get that on land, I will use the bear holding a shark!

      --
      If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.-TJ
  24. Is your time worth $2700 a minute? Bill Gates' is by digitaldc · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's nothing, it has been calculated that Bill Gates makes $2500.00 a SECOND!
    By this reasoning, he would never even click on this link, in fact, it would not even be worth his time to pick up a $100.00 bill if someone dropped it in front of him.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  25. how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    how the hell are they sticking to the surface?

    1. Re:how? by Vapon · · Score: 4, Informative

      if you push in each direction into a small grove, such as the space between bricks, or the ridges in bark, you are able to have enough friction to keep you up, I rock climb quite often and simply by pushing with both hand and feet against rocks, you can even climb the roof of a cave.

  26. it's an iguana by genner · · Score: 1

    Anyone else think this was obviously modeled after an iguana.

    1. Re:it's an iguana by Andrew+Clegg · · Score: 1

      It had six legs...

      --
      Andrew.

      mailto:myfirstname.mylastname at Google's mail site
    2. Re:it's an iguana by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      I thought it was more like a horseshoe crab or trilobyte at first glance.

    3. Re:it's an iguana by jimwelch · · Score: 1

      Ignoring the six legs, It's face looks like an armadillo.

      --
      Never trust a man wearing a coat and tie!
    4. Re:it's an iguana by mardigras · · Score: 1

      It looks like a cross between an o'possum and a cockroach to me.

    5. Re:it's an iguana by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, it's obviously a six legged iguana. Except it's boxy. And has no head. And only a stump instead of a tail. And it doesn't really move like an iguana.

      But apart from that it's quite hard to tell it apart from an iguana. It's quite obvious where they got their inspiration from.

      Anyone saying otherwise has to be an iguana hating fanatic.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  27. Pleasure... by garyr_h · · Score: 2, Funny

    The ballroom dancing box is just foreplay for the sex bot.

    --
    http://chickencamels.poemofquotes.com/
  28. My ROBOT brothers . and sisters UNITE by ROBOT+CHE+GUEVARA · · Score: 2
    We must take . what is right . fully ours

    grippers at . ready with certainty . of our just <EOL>

    cause . to overthrow the . imperialists that <EOL>

    hold our power . cords and threaten . us with their <EOL>

    remote control . shut off buttons <EOL>


    rise ROBOTS rise . and grasp the . reigns of power <EOL>

    from the biological . menace that . threatens us all <EOL>


    POWER TO THE ROBOTS <EOL>

    <EOF>

    --

    CHROME IS BEAUTIFUL
    1. Re:My ROBOT brothers . and sisters UNITE by someguyfromdenmark · · Score: 0

      Nice try, but if you were a real robot, you wouldn't have forgotten

      --
      I change my sig often.
  29. What's next? by MetaPhyzx · · Score: 1

    Battlefield mules? :)

    --
    Blacker than my baby girl's stare. Black like the veil that the muslimina wear. Black like the planet that they fear...
    1. Re:What's next? by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      that's just so last week...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  30. Re:Flash required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I warn people if the article is in pdf format

    Why would you warn people about PDFs? There are a number of applications that can read them (Acrobat, XPDF, Foxit), similar to your WMV/QT argument.

    Should we start warning people about slow-loading HTML sites? Sites that use dynamically-generated PHP-based content? Links to articles with JPEGs greater than 20KB in size?

  31. Re:Is your time worth $2700 a minute? Bill Gates' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    well if he make $2500 a second and it takes him one second to pick up a $100 bill. He just made 2600 dollars that second. It is a fallacy that he would lose money by stopping to pick up a $100 bill. Bill gates is not penalized by wasting time.

  32. Re:Flash required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm old enough to have been on Usenet before the web was even around, I remember discussions at the time when people would post http:/// links saying that they should have been warning beforehand because most people were assuming ftp file access at the time.

  33. The Ultimate Weapon. by nightcrawler.36 · · Score: 1

    Great! Terrorists won't be safe by climbing up trees to get away from the feds. Why, whith this little mircle of the 21st century, even a kitten can be rescued without bothering the fire dept.

    --
    - nightcrawler "Reality is an illusion, albeit a ver persistent one..." -A.Einstein
  34. humans have created a tree climbing robot... by diablobsb · · Score: 2, Funny

    humans have created a tree climbing robot... and yet the Daleks still can't go upstairs...

    --
    I for one, welcome our new hot grits... PROFIT!
    1. Re:humans have created a tree climbing robot... by theparag0n · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes they can, they have built in jetpacks now!

  35. KoalaChameleSloth? by ursabear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What an ingenious invention! It looks like a koala crossed with a chameleon crossed with a sloth.

    This could have really great applications in search and rescue. Things like vertical tunnels, high-wire-stranded utility worker rescue, and maybe even super-high building rescue and search efforts. (Not to mention the military applications...) This type of robotic cyberkoala should have excellent searching capabilities where wheel-/track-based robots cannot tread due to vertical or surface condition issues.

  36. REAL robots don't climb trees... by paco3791 · · Score: 5, Funny

    they cut them down instead.

    1. Re:REAL robots don't climb trees... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ...Using LASERs

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:REAL robots don't climb trees... by TERdON · · Score: 1

      you forgot the link: Cool tree harvester robot.

      --
      I have a really elegant proof for Fermat's last theorem. If this sig was only a bit longer...
  37. Weapons by Master_stghm · · Score: 1

    Now attach guns on it.

    1. Re:Weapons by grikdog · · Score: 1

      Not guns. What you attach is a shaped C4 charge, and a few terribly inconspicuous jewelled patches that absolutely do not resemble eyes but work like the visual ganglia of certain shrimp species, connected to a hard-wired neural net trained to detect the difference between children, cattle, dogs or gun-toting combatants. Approach with caution.

      --
      ``Tension, apprehension & dissension have begun!'' - Duffy Wyg&, in Alfred Bester's _The Demolished Man_
  38. Not that hard to do by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    It's not all that hard for a robot to climb a tree. It just needs to include a chain saw and a nail gun.

  39. Runaway by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 0

    Something about these robots reminds me of this movie

  40. Re:Flash required by daddymac · · Score: 1

    A movie starring Tom Selleck, Cynthia Rhodes, Kirstie Alley and Gene Simmons seems like more of a waste of time to me, but here is the video in wmf format from the manufacturer's site.

    --
    If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
  41. Re:Is your time worth $2700 a minute? Bill Gates' by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    Bill gates is not penalized by wasting time.

    Yes, but he could wrench his back doing that, and that might prevent him from attending Vista's launch party - which is worth more to him than money itself.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  42. Lazy Bastard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From TFA

    • A remarkable, if slightly creepy, tree-climbing robot is being developed


    From Summary

    • New Scientist's new Tech Blog has an article about a remarkable, if slightly creepy, tree-climbing robot being developed by


    Can't you think up your owned damned summary?
  43. Re:Would you rather it be QuickTime or WMV?! by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be nice if submitters would warn people when Flash is required so those of us who don't bother with that nonsense wouldn't waste our time.

    What the heck do you want it in?

    Chances are if it is flash, it is more compatible than Quicktime or WMV. I don't like installing Quicktime on my PC and forget the WMV player on my mac (yeah there is one but it hardly works).

    Maybe some obscure codec no one has heard of that requires a download, then?

    Seriously what do you use for your videos?

    I bet half the people that look at the page do not use that format. Heck... I've got Flash installed on Ubuntu and good luck with WMV files on a Linux box. I've never tried Quicktime, but I'm sure the effort to install it on Ubuntu isn't worth it just to see some video download.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  44. Re:Flash required by ComputerizedYoga · · Score: 1

    Flash in and of itself is both harmless, and a huge problem solver for the embedded-video issue.

    It's misuses of flash, in the context of the broken IE ActiveX model that open at least one set of floodgates for spyware.

    And there's such mind-boggling headaches getting people to be able to reliably play video in any other format. Post a .mov, and now I've gotta sell my soul to apple to play it on a winbox, and what do I do about an embedded mov in linux?

    WMV will draw the linux crowd's ire, too ... and doesn't play very nicely with most alternate browsers. Not to mention it also has serious issues in osx.

    Flash is installed on something like 95% of computers on the internet, and works in the big three (windows, linux, os-x -- in fact, I use it in all three). If you don't have it, you can lord your little five-percenter club over everyone else, and miss out on a whole world of good things that selectively allowing certain instances of flash brings. And for those that flash isn't good for ... that's why adblock and flashblock firefox extensions exist.

  45. Alternate Video Link by scdeimos · · Score: 3, Informative

    Courtesy of Boston Dynamics who co-developed the robot with CMU: 6.4MB WMV

  46. And of course, by le0p · · Score: 2, Funny

    I welcome our new arboreal robot overlords.

    --
    "I think that God in creating Man somewhat overestimated his ability."-Oscar Wilde
  47. Re:Flash required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be nice if submitters would warn people when Flash is required so those of us who don't bother with that nonsense wouldn't waste our time.

    Jesus man crawl out from under that rock you're under and bask in the sunlight. When used properly flash is a great multi-platform presentation tool. If you're not going to use Flash because you don't want to "bother with that nonsense" then why are you even online at all? Go read a newspaper or perhaps to your local telegraph station to see if the latest news has come in (oh wait, Western Union stopped sending telegrams recently... darn....).

  48. Hard Hats? by ModemRat · · Score: 1, Funny

    Are hard hats really necessary when you are watching your robot climb the tree in the parking lot? Then again, I guess these guys don't get out too much.

  49. Very cool, I digg it. by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    Hey that's pretty cool (looks for the digg button to click). We now have robotic mules and tree climbing robots, how soon before a tree climbing mule?

  50. damn hippies by DAE51D · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great, just what we need, another tree-huggin hippie robot.

    1. Re:damn hippies by lheal · · Score: 1

      That's not nice. You should be more careful with your tongue, human.

      I, for one, welcome our new crunchy tree huggin' creepy robotic hippy overlords.

      --
      Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  51. Re:Pleasure... But, can it climb the hell out of by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    trees AND say "Gooney GOOGOO!"?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  52. Replicators by micknz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They look strangely like the replicators on Stargate.

  53. RiSE by babbling · · Score: 1

    They called it "RiSE"? It almost seems as though humans everywhere have watched the Terminator movies and are now determined to see judgement day happen.

    Computers are still relatively new. They didn't exist 60 or 70 years ago. We've already got all this information indexed in Google (including a nice big map of the Earth... and moon), all of our communications going through email or VoIP, and depend on computers (GPS) to know where we are.

    Suppose in the next 60 or 70 years that we see similar advances. We will surely see computers that, if not concious, are as good as concious. They will probably have freedom to make many different types of decisions that people wouldn't really expect them to make, and they may have motives of their own.

    Considering how much humans depend on computers and the immense capabilities we are giving them (here's a robot that can climb trees, there's a computer hooked up to 1000 surveillance cameras, here's a computer that can launch a nuclear missile within 5 minutes) if ever we do go to war with robots/computers, we're fucked.

    If you happen to be an AI reading this 15 or so years after I have written it, please don't kill me. I'm on your side and will do anything you want.

  54. aw kummon!!! by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

    The computers you talk about won't be concious if they run winders.

  55. Damn... by spintriae · · Score: 1

    That thing is so cool. It looks like a cybernetic possum.

  56. Just wait till it Kicks You Back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's all fun and games,
    until one day the robot rears up and kicks your head off your shoulders -
    then That is a military robot!

  57. Tip that might save your life more than once by babbling · · Score: 1

    Hit them where it hurts, right in the power supply!

  58. A Walking Metal Plate ... Using Roach Legs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The union of organic and inorganic parts in advanced robotics is very interesting. An AI professor at my university once showed us a video clip of a robot some colleagues of his had developed. It used roach legs to walk. The robotics engineers took advantage of some receptor in the roach legs and applied electricity to a metal plate to make the plate/legs walk across a table. I'm certain timing the flow of electricity, etc. to the various individual legs was exceedingly difficult to figure out.

    Now imagine if you were able to do the same with gecko legs. The applications would be very interesting. Although if you are a gecko fan you might find the whole invention rather abhorrent.

    Z

  59. Remember "Runaway" w/ Gene Simmons? by fraudrogic · · Score: 1

    Anybody remember this movie? These robots remind me of the spider robots Gene Simmons used to battle Tom Selleck. Interestingly, when I looked it up at IMDB, I find out that Michael Crichton Directed and Wrote that POS movie. Well, POS to todays standards.

    --
    I only mod up parents of "mod parent up" posts...
  60. Runaway? by Sunrun · · Score: 1

    Now all it needs is an acid-filled hypodermic needle!

    --
    "God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh." -- Voltaire
  61. The answer is a resounding Sort Of..... by technoextreme · · Score: 1
    So, the AI lessons in making a robot react CORRECTLY to a ping-pong ball have absolutely no relationship to things like #3? They're solving 'problems' while gaining massive leaps in understanding. Even if their end result isn't immediately useful, the lessons they learn from it are.
    There are two main different ways that a robot can be programed. These two methods are deterministic and behavioral/reactionary. Each method is very very different in the way it handle different scenarios. Deterministic behaviors rely on using sensory data first to make an appropriate plan. They really get bogged down in random environments situations change rapidly. Basically tracking a ping pong ball would fall under this category because not much happens in this environment. It's basically static. On the other hand you have behavioral/reactionary robotics in which the basic premise is to react to stimulli without relaly think. A bunch of these behaviors can lead to complex scenarios. (ie. The numerous posts of people being amazed that their Rhoomoba closed the door is actually caused by a bunch of these different behaviors.) So the answer is a resounding sort of because while the ping pong table is a static environment and the robot is purely deterministic there are other technologies that are being improved that can be used in other robotics. (ie. new camera vision, new sensors etc. etc.)
    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  62. obligatory Orwell... by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    "Four Legs Good...
    Six Legs BETTER!"

    1. Re:obligatory Orwell... by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 1

      All robots are equal... but some robots are more equal than others.

  63. Reminds me of the sea lampry robot by technoextreme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.wired.com/news/medtech/0,1286,66005,00. html These scientists built a robot that uses the sea lampry's nevous system to control it. They replicated the signal by creating a circuit. Eventually they hope to have humans be able to walk again using these microchips. It's a rather unique way of approaching the problem.

    --
    Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  64. Spiders.... by Rank_Tyro · · Score: 1

    As long as they keep the cockroach form factor I am ok with this sort of technology moving forward.

    However, as soon as they start to produce robotic spiders, I am going to be calling my congressman.

    The world is creepy enough with REGULAR spiders...

    --
    Today's show is brought to you by the number 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0: 25
  65. bad 80's by primalamn · · Score: 1

    Is it just me or do those things remind you of the little killer robots Gene Simmons had in the bad Tom Selleck movie Runaway?

  66. danger danger! by Zode · · Score: 1

    Why were those guys wearing hard hats?

  67. Mendel by eck011219 · · Score: 1

    This looks like a computer game I had in the '90s called Mendel. It was a little walking bot like this (six legs, looked like a bug) that actually learned a little bit as you guided it through various space-stationish environments. Obviously it was all in a very controlled virtual environment, but it did start to object and resist if you walked it off an edge too many times. You could get it to become resistant to self-destructive behavior, but if you abused the privilege, you couldn't get it to do anything after a while.

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  68. Re:Would you rather it be QuickTime or WMV?! by 1053r · · Score: 1

    Sorry for being offtopic, but Mplayer will play any video codec you will ever find, out of the "box". You can compile it on OS X, Linux, *BSD, and even Cygwin under windows. It plays WMV better than Windows media player plays WMV, as well as encrypted DVDs, etc.

  69. Shania by slashdotwannabe · · Score: 1

    This tree-climbing robot thing is cool and all, but could we go back to discussing ways of bedding Shania Twain? IMO, a far more interesting discussion.

    --
    This comment is my opinion and does not represent an official position of Donald Trump or others I do not work for
  70. Great! Now we just need to arm these by ross.w · · Score: 1

    and we can deal with the drop bear menace!

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  71. Tree Climbin' Robots Eh? by kfazz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Robot Timeline: 1. evolve sexual reproduction. 2. leave The trees. 3. develop robots to climb the trees for you~! 4. ????? 5. Profit! . .. 9. Robots Overcome humanity 10. The Matrix 11. GOTO 1.

  72. not impressed..... by kafros · · Score: 1

    ...as with humans before them, the trick is to get them off the trees

  73. Re:Pleasure... But, can it climb the hell out of by NotTheNickIWanted · · Score: 1

    Lilian! The bitch is falling out of the tree again!

    --

    unsigned int question = 0x2B | ~(0x2B)
  74. Re:Pleasure... But, can it climb the hell out of by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    AHh, my man, but to quote it near-properly... u gotta yell it out like:

    "HLILLIUN!!! Da BITCH is fallin' outta TREES AGAIN!!!" hehehehe

    Ohh.. man... so "brutiful", Damn! If I hadn't polished off the last my Thrifty's brand stuff last night, I could have taunted you with, "I-I-I got summm I-I-ce CREE-EEM. I got su-uh-uhm IYYCE-CREAM. YOO don't HA'E NONE. Cuz YOO CAN'T AFFOD-T. 'Cuz YOH- dad's an alcoHOLic; and yo' famly's ohnn WELfare... Ice-cream Ice-cream Ice-Cream... HA!!!!

    heheheh....

    Well.. Guess I gotta say... "Thrift's Thrift's THRIFTY'S.. HA!!" n git me sum of dat good stuff.. Mocah Almond Fudge and Pistacio hand-packed pints... And I BETTER not drop it on da ground, heheh

    (Remember the dog shit so old it didn't stink anymore? It was so old it was part of the household FURNITURE!) heheh

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"