Slashdot Mirror


Philips Recalls Almost 12,000 Flat Panel TVs

wh0pper writes "Arcing capacitors have caused Philips to recall select Ambilight flat panel (read plasma) TVs. Because the TVs make use of flame retardant materials, damage was only sustained to the TVs and not homes. This is the first time I've heard of TVs having this type of issue. How safe are LCD and DLP TVs from this type of thing?"

173 comments

  1. Plasma?!?! by brohan · · Score: 5, Funny

    The plasma's leaking all over Engineering Seal off engineering with a level 10 forcefeild and jettison the warp core^W^W TV.

    1. Re:Plasma?!?! by nettdata · · Score: 1

      Where the hell is CleverNickName when you really need him!

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    2. Re:Plasma?!?! by StanVassilevTroll · · Score: 0

      no, no. fuck me.

      --
      I like to take it in the ass
  2. CRT by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ever see a CRT go up? A nice big flash followed by some of the worst stench outside of a Linux convention ;)

    Seriously, I think the hazard from the toxic chemicals is worse than the danger of something catching on fire.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:CRT by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 4, Funny

      The tingle just means it's working!

    2. Re:CRT by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd just like to say that the "Linux convention smell" is obviously directed at all the Microsoft employees who sneak in to see what they are up against. In no way was I refering to our Open Source Overlords' bathing patterns.

      (bye bye karma)

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:CRT by pryoplasm · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      yeah, though you have to go in and break off the nipple first before disposal of a CRT, if you want to do it the legit way and what not...

      --
      Those who live by the sword, get shot by those who live by the gun...
    4. Re:CRT by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't think 'once' can be claled a pattern.

    5. Re:CRT by silverdr · · Score: 0

      Ever see a CRT go up?

      In fact, yes! In the late seventies and early eighties some of the early, tube based colour CRTs with wooden cabinet were quite high on the fire risk and I saw some catching fire myself.

      --
      Now, mod me down freely. My karma can't get any worse...
    6. Re:CRT by el_benito · · Score: 1

      Here comes the science!! //couldn't resist

      --
      http://liquidben.com - Aspiring to an 'under construction' gif
    7. Re:CRT by bodester17 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actaully arcing capacitors just mean that there is a design flaw in the capacitor, not the TV itself. This has nothing to do with the type of TV it is. All electronic devices have capacitors. An arcing capcitor just means that the insulating material inside the capacitor does not have a high enough insulation constant to prevent the amount of voltage in the capacitor from sparking. Either phillips overloaded the capacitors or the manufactorer of the capacitors did not spec them correctly.

    8. Re:CRT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next time you might try replying to the correct post. Kudos to the mod for missing this as well.

  3. fire retardant by alxkit · · Score: 1

    "Because the TVs make use of flame retardent materials,"
     
    RoHS does not allow for this. Arching capacitors can be just a smoke screen.

    1. Re:fire retardant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't know what you are talking about. RoHS says nothing about flame retardant materials. RoHS is mostly concerned with the composition of circuit boards and the way in which they are soldered.

    2. Re:fire retardant by alxkit · · Score: 1

      strong words coming from Anonymous Coward. But to edumacate you, I have to say that RoHS (just like Senate Bill 20) aims at reducing hazardous substances from consumer electronics. Fire retardants are amongst them. Look it up, beyatch: "heavy metals (Pb,Hg, Cd and Cr6), and of brominates fire retardants (PBB or PBDE)"

    3. Re:fire retardant by Xciton · · Score: 1

      Ummm.. Maybe you should start doing some reading and get your story stright. I hope the company you work for isn't going by your knowledge. You're gonig to get a big surprise in mid 2006!!!!

      RoHS is not limited to PCB's.

    4. Re:fire retardant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to read he said mostly.

    5. Re:fire retardant by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      In this model however, the "flame retardant" is just a water filled baloon stuck above the power supply. Excessive heat triggers the water release. Perfectly environment friendly.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    6. Re:fire retardant by Disavian · · Score: 1

      How are you gentlemen?!?!

    7. Re:fire retardant by Amouth · · Score: 1

      you Remined me of a funny one

      take an LED

      reverse the polarity of the power input and increase it x10

      you get an SED

      (Smoke emiting diod)

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    8. Re:fire retardant by caesar-auf-nihil · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, RoHS does allow for some flame retardants deemed safe under those use guidelines. While not knowing exactly what Philips uses for its plastic, since I am a fire safety researcher, I'm betting that they used a polycarbonate + RoHS allowed flame retardant system, or something similar.
      Not all flame retardants are banned under RoHS. Many are eliminated under a related code (waste electronic and electical enclosures or WEEE) but not all are banned.

      --
      -When going for broke, go for Ithaca!
    9. Re:fire retardant by StanVassilevTroll · · Score: 0

      wow. it's usually hard to tell from a text post, but you're either a hairy ugly fat bitch or a gay man. If you are indeed a gay man, I would like to invite you to join the party at the honeypot that is my ass.

      --
      I like to take it in the ass
    10. Re:fire retardant by BillX · · Score: 1

      Does that necessarily mean "impregnated with a flame-retarding chemical"? Concrete is a good flame-retardant material, but I doubt it's banned by RoHS. (yes, IAAEE, but RoHS hasn't hit our 5-prototypes-a-year lab yet)

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  4. Isn't Plasma... by Kittie+Rose · · Score: 1

    The fourth state of matter you get from Super-heating gas? Clouds of highly charged particles and that? Wouldn't you kind of expect that to be dangerous?

    --
    EpiAdv - if you like Pokey the Penguin, try this comic!
    1. Re:Isn't Plasma... by theurge14 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, it's something you donate by sticking needles in your arm.

    2. Re:Isn't Plasma... by tector · · Score: 5, Informative

      Plasma TV methodogy basics.

      A Plasma tv has two plates of glass that sandwich panels of cells (the pixels) that house 3 sub-pixels corresponding to the colours blue red and green.

      The TV's control circuit can address any of the sub-pixels through the rear glass substrate mounted circuit and pass an electrical charge through neon and xenon gas and as a result, the gas state changes to plasma and ultraviolet light is emitted.

      This UV light is absorbed by the blue, red and green phosphors in the cell, and re-radiate the energy in the visible spectrum.

      It's fairly old technology, dating back to the '60s.

      Isn't science fun?

    3. Re:Isn't Plasma... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Donate? You dumbass, it's something you sell so you have some pocket change for the night at the bar! Newbie....

    4. Re:Isn't Plasma... by pallmall1 · · Score: 2, Funny
      The fourth state of matter you get from Super-heating gas? Clouds of highly charged particles and that?
      Sounds like a really ripe fart.
      Wouldn't you kind of expect that to be dangerous?
      Only if you try to light it.
      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    5. Re:Isn't Plasma... by Firehed · · Score: 1

      I think comments like that tend to earn you the bottom spot in the blood transfusion list. You must be confusing blood plasma with another highly useful bodily fluid, which tends to be considerably less painful to give away.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    6. Re:Isn't Plasma... by Kittie+Rose · · Score: 1

      Well yeah, I did read up on "How Things Work" a while back :P I wasn't aware it was as old as the 60s though. But technically, Plasma is often considered the fourth state of matter, and is hotter than the substance's equivellent gaseous form.

      --
      EpiAdv - if you like Pokey the Penguin, try this comic!
    7. Re:Isn't Plasma... by tector · · Score: 1

      hmm... I seem to remember something about superheating a substance until it is too hot for an atom to maintain the atomic bond between the nuclei and the electrons, resulting in a highly electrified soup of free electons and still bonded nuclei surrounded by neutrons and protrons.

      I am gazing suspiciously at my plasma tv, not running as hot as the sun and not a hot as a fusion reactor. I think it is a plasma(tm) tv. Probably not too many free electrons :)

    8. Re:Isn't Plasma... by umofomia · · Score: 3, Insightful
      But technically, Plasma is often considered the fourth state of matter, and is hotter than the substance's equivellent gaseous form.
      So? The gas only remains as a plasma as long as the electrical current is going through it. If it breaks, then it immediately cools down to room temperature since there's so little of the gas in the first place. Each of the individual ions are at a high temperature, but since there are so few of them, not much heat energy is transferred to the surrounding environment. All those neon lights you see everywhere are also just glowing tubes of plasma. You don't see them wreaking havoc when they break.
    9. Re:Isn't Plasma... by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I used to "donate" plasma.

      $20 for first visit in a week, $30 for the second visit in a week. A week being from sunday to saturday.

      Nice extra $200 a month for bout 16 hours.

      Blood you can only donate something like once every month or two.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    10. Re:Isn't Plasma... by Warg!+The+Orcs!! · · Score: 1

      You don't see them wreaking havoc when they break.

      Ho ho! Sounds like someone here has never had to clear up a shattered neon tube. Not fun.

      --
      Travelling forward in time at a rate of 1 second per second.
    11. Re:Isn't Plasma... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Not really. Neon signs? Plasma. Ordinairy fire? Plasma.

      Basically any self-illuminating gas is in the plasma state.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    12. Re:Isn't Plasma... by modecx · · Score: 1

      A plasma TV is basically just a collection of a bunch of tiny flourescent lights, in different colors. I don't know exactly how long flourescent lights have been around, but the principle has been known since aroun 1900.

      And "plasma" dosen't necessairly mean that it's any hotter than the component gasses normally would be, it just means that the gas has at least partially ionized (the gasses' electrons expand from their normal positions, or completely disembark from the neucleus, forming an electron cloud of sorts)... Though it's usually the case that plasma has to be heated. Maybe someone in the future invents a method for creating plasma without heating it so signifigantly...

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    13. Re:Isn't Plasma... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Well, the gasses in a plasma TV are at low pressure, and therefor don't need nearly as much heat to excite them to that point.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    14. Re:Isn't Plasma... by (negative+video) · · Score: 1
      Maybe someone in the future invents a method for creating plasma without heating it so signifigantly...
      You mean like the corona discharge inside every laser printer and photocopier?
    15. Re:Isn't Plasma... by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

      Plasma technology dates back far beyond the sixties. I should know, I'm a tech buff and a sixties buff (I will be writing a journal to explain). You find plasma technology in fluorescent lights (30's) neon lights (19th century and up), HID lights (again 19th century and up), Carbon Arc Lights, neon glow tubes, thyatron tubes (tube verson of an SCR), and so on. There are many plasma technologies out there. Oh I forgot the holy grail of numerical displays; the Nixie tube.

      --
      sudo mod me up
    16. Re:Isn't Plasma... by tector · · Score: 1

      Yes, the flourencent tube lights do date well before the sixties, but unless I'm mistraken, the use of the UV discharge from the neon & xenon to excite the rgb phosphor was from the sixties.

  5. Turnips... by Spactonic · · Score: 1, Informative

    LCD and DLP rear projection TVs use entirely different technology, you muppet. if you want to be a techie, know WTF you are talking about.

    1. Re:Turnips... by Spactonic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Disclaimer: Drueank!

    2. Re:Turnips... by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      They're not entirely different. They all have power cords so they all have an associated fire risk. Something else they have in common is that they are usually mounted to a wall where a small fire could turn into a big one.

    3. Re:Turnips... by Spactonic · · Score: 1

      I salute your nerdness

    4. Re:Turnips... by bluephone · · Score: 1
      He didn't say they were, he asked. That sounds less like him trying to be a techie, and more like he's trying to learn. Learning should always be encouraged.

      To answer the OP, much "safer", but only if you plan on jamming metal implements into your TV. Plasma TVs make use of highly charged gases (neon and xenon, my favorine noble gases), which means you need to generate that charge in the TV set. CRTs also use high voltage, but LCDs can run on just a few volts of power with little current (I.E. a slow trickle versus a raging river). DLPs are also low power, aside from the lights inside the projector. All TVs can have components blow, in the old days, fuses and tubes, today, capacitors and power transformers. with proper manufacturing, and proper use (No, the TV really doesn't need a chocolate milkshave, I swear, and it's considered bad taste to watch TV in the shower) they're all safe.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    5. Re:Turnips... by jmcmunn · · Score: 1


      I have never seen a DLP mounted to a wall...I guess it would be possible since my 46 inch Samsung only weighs about 75 lbs, but there is no wasy way to do it unless you buy a huge wall bracket or something. So there's one less thing they "all have in common". Yes, the power cord is a fire risk I suppose...

    6. Re:Turnips... by Spactonic · · Score: 1

      Beer! Excellent! Oops! Must watch out for those arcing capacitors...aaah, Beer! Sod the burning TV.

    7. Re:Turnips... by Spactonic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Christ, you really are an American cunt aren't you...

    8. Re:Turnips... by UltraAyla · · Score: 1

      yes they are different, but LCDs happen to also make use of capacitors, the cause of the problems, even if they aren't necessarily using them for the exact same reasons.

    9. Re:Turnips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LCD TVs can cause prostate cancer unles you eat hot peppers while watching. I swear it's true. Bill Nye, the Science Guy told me so.

    10. Re:Turnips... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's at least one. It uses the same OmniMount bracket that a plasma or LCD of similar size would use.

    11. Re:Turnips... by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      I want a chocolate milkshave!!! Where can i get one? Thailand?

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    12. Re:Turnips... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      but LCDs can run on just a few volts of power with little current

      That's true about the LCD, but it's not true about the backlight.

    13. Re:Turnips... by bluephone · · Score: 1

      LED backlighting, hell, even small incandescents, like in flashlights, or any portable video game system/TV.

      --
      jX [ Make everything as simple as possible, but no simpler. - Einstein ]
    14. Re:Turnips... by iainl · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'd be more than a little surprised if Philips' Ambilight LCD range don't have the same problem; the problem is with the Ambilight circuitry and not that of the TV itself.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  6. First time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    >>This is the first time I've heard of TVs having this type of issue.

    Of course. Because it was the first time somebody came out with a really stupid idea of ambilight!

    1. Re:First time? by chthon · · Score: 1

      Are you working at Philips ?

    2. Re:First time? by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Not the first time at all. Sylvania had a similar idea back in the B/W era.

      Beginning in 1952, some of their high-end sets incorporated a feature called "HaloLight", which was an illuminated bezel surrounding the CRT, designed to reduce eyestrain when watching the set in a dark room.

      Everything old is new again....

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  7. Those boys over at Philips... by mangus_angus · · Score: 1

    should check out these TVS... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4614598.stm

  8. Not a problem with the panel... by heli0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "This is the first time I've heard of TVs having this type of issue. How safe are LCD and DLP TVs from this type of thing?"

    The source of the problem are fluorescent lights that Philips built into these sets to illuminate the wall behind the display. There is a fix: turn the bulbs off.

    http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/electronics-com puters/philips-plasma-tvs-recalled-306.htm

    "The recall includes sets with "Ambilight," or ambient light technology that projects a soft glow onto the wall behind the set, to create atmosphere and an enhanced viewing experience, according to the company. If owners turn off the Ambilight feature, the hazard is eliminated."

    --
    Whenever the offence inspires less horror than the punishment, the rigour of penal law is obliged to give way...
    1. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know why the Ambilight feature is cool don't you?

      It helps reduce eye strain when you watch tv/movies with the lights off.

      Even neater is that it provides different colors based on what's being displayed.

      I was really hoping the idea would take off & quickyl trickle down to cheaper TVs. Looks like they're going to have to reengineer their solution :o(

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re-engineer, I am more thinking buying more sturdy caps, or tossing a new PSU design (that are made by the dozen)

    3. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by syukton · · Score: 1

      I think some RGB LEDs would solve the problem rather nicely...

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    4. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by tech10171968 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm surprised this has just *now* made the news, because my electronics repair shop received the bulletin a few months ago (we're a Phillips-authorized electronics repair facility). There's also another issue not many people know about: it seems that when Ambilight is engaged the unit will sometimes shut down intermittently. My shop's been swamped with fixing these Phillips recalls lately, but fortunately none of our customers have experienced "Phillips flameout" as of yet.

      --
      This space for rent!
    5. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by HaMMeReD3 · · Score: 1

      It doesnt sound to hard, some leds with some sort of fiber to spread the light. it's amazing that it would use so much power as to spark the lcd. The cheap way of doing this would be to allow light from the tv to leak out the back, which would also change depending on what it's displaying. Save some money on materials too.

    6. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the knee-jerk pet-peeve reaction, but ... Philips spells its name with one L only. I guess the tendency to double it is for easier/more natural pronounciation in English, but ... It's still not right. :)

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    7. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      What eye strain? Could just turn down the brightness if it's that big a deal to ya.

    8. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

      If your a bit of a techy you can make your own using the color component of an svideo output and a little pile of LED's. I think mine was about $21 of parts from radio shack, and its got 3 ultra bright LEDS for R, G, and B (9 total), and you get the color in sync with a little varistor.

      --
      Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
      Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
    9. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1
      What eye strain?

      They use to say not to watch TV in the dark. Your pupil dilates in the dark, more light gets in than would normally, greater stress to the eye happens. Now, the CAO says watching TV in day light conditions is equally as dangerous, but that overall reading is more dangerous to your eyes. Well, if I have these eyes, but can't use them, what good are they? According to this link, the CAO also suggests you shouldn't watch TV with sunglasses on (sic). Well, what else am I supposed to use these Ray Bans for?

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    10. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Looks like they're going to have to reengineer their solution :o(

      I'm surprised they were using fluorescent lighing for this in the first place. I would have thought a couple banks of inexpensive LEDs would provide the effect quite nicely.

    11. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      "to create atmosphere and an enhanced viewing experience"

      Well, that's what you get for watching Backdraft on this thing.

      --
      I don't get it.
    12. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Turning down the brightness also reduces the contrast in the image itself, which leads to eye strain.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Not a problem with the panel... by unitron · · Score: 1

      This is off-topic (although I'd be glad to throw in a rant about "capacitor disease"), but do you guys have access to Daewoo VCR parts? I need a source for a particular gear that got chewed up due to a design flaw and they won't sell to individuals. No Daewoo authorized shops around here either. You can email me your shop phone number at myslashdotusername@coastalnet.com if you can help.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  9. Philips... Ambiflame by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

    images so realistic you won't be sure your wall's not on fire.

    1. Re:Philips... Ambiflame by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      images so realistic you won't be sure your wall's not on fire.

      Hehehe, is it on fire or is it Philips?

      Hey, whadda ya know, its both.

  10. CRT-Tubes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Ever see a CRT go up? A nice big flash followed by some of the worst stench outside of a Linux convention ;)"

    Yup. I've been responsable for a few.* I even remember when TV had metal chassis and tubes. Shocking would be an understatement.

    *Ok, ok so my team lost a couple times.

  11. Not a plasma issue by stephenisu · · Score: 4, Informative
    How safe are LCD and DLP TVs from this type of thing?

    RTFA, the fires were caused by an arcing capacitor used in the ambilight system. The ambilight system has nothing to do with the plama technology, its just a rear lighting system projected on your back wall to help prevent the weird feeling you get from watching a large image (that and a marketing gimmick). This is more fire cause by a faulty ballast or capacator in a flourecent lighting system in your ceiling.

    --
    Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
    1. Re:Not a plasma issue by stephenisu · · Score: 1

      self mod down redundant. Better said above.

      --
      Sigs? We don't need no stinking sigs!
  12. News I need? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 0, Troll

    When ever there is a product recall, will it make fron page at Slashdot?

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:News I need? by technoextreme · · Score: 1
      When ever there is a product recall, will it make fron page at Slashdot?
      News for nerds. Stuff that matters? Im not sure about you but something that may set fire to my house may be something that might matters to someone.
      --
      Ooo man the floppy drive is broken. No wait. The computer is just upside down.
  13. HDTV by Taimat · · Score: 5, Funny

    "WOW Dad.. you were right about HDTV - Those flames in Ladder49 look real!"

    --
    The above comments are not guaranteed to make sense to anyone other than the author...
  14. Ambilight is... by eno2001 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...the stupidest thing I've seen in decades. I think they must have resurrected some Zenith engineer from 1957 who thought that would be a "futuristic" idea. The claim is that it would reduce eye strain since the border between the monitor and the wall would be less harsh. I say BS, because being honest, how many people watch movies with the lights on? at my house we even turn the lights off to watch The Mighty Boosh on BBC America!

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    1. Re:Ambilight is... by Anne+Honime · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I say BS, because being honest, how many people watch movies with the lights on? at my house we even turn the lights off to watch The Mighty Boosh on BBC America!

      Like most people suffering from frequent headaches, I never watch at a screen (be it TV or computer) without an ambient light. Without, I can be sure to develop a severe migraine after 1 hour of concentrated watch. With a dim light, I can watch TV up to 4 hours without side effects (save brain wash). This sadly apply to theatres too, so I really don't watch a film on a big screen often.

    2. Re:Ambilight is... by Xciton · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps you should do some reading before spouting off.

    3. Re:Ambilight is... by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I say BS, because being honest, how many people watch movies with the lights on?

      I would prefer to use my monitor with the lights off but some bastard keeps on turning on the sun.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    4. Re:Ambilight is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an Phillips ambilight and I can speak from personal experience. Ambilight sucks. It isn't that the set doesn't look better with lighting, it does. It is just that the ambilight is far too weak. WhenI watch the plasma I turn on the overhead recessed lighting. It (subjectively) makes it much easier to watch, From what I can tell Ambilight is like getting warm from a candle. It might keep you alive if you're stranded in car but if you want to be comfortable you need a bit more.

    5. Re:Ambilight is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sun? What's that?

    6. Re:Ambilight is... by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      I think it looks like a ricer feature. Like you, I turn the lights off, but I do it to get the theatrical effect. When simply using my computer or watching normal TV, I keep the lights on so the contrast isn't so blinding.

      Still, whatever makes you a few extra bucks a pop, right?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    7. Re:Ambilight is... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      I have to admit it never even occured to me to turn the lights off to watch a movie...

      Except possibly when there was a light reflected in the screen or something...

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    8. Re:Ambilight is... by Rick.C · · Score: 1
      some bastard keeps on turning on the sun

      Voice of God: Bastard? If I had wanted a father, I would have created one for myself.

      Voice of God, (walking away shaking head): Whiners. I gave them Light... I gave them Lightning... I gave them Bud Light... Bunch a' whiners...

      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    9. Re:Ambilight is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why you can adjust contrast and luminosity. You can probably even save it in custom settings that you can recall by one button on the remote control if your TV set is well designed.

    10. Re:Ambilight is... by GrayCalx · · Score: 1

      I would prefer to use my monitor with the lights off but some bastard keeps on turning on the sun.

      You would've gotten away with it too if it wasn't for those pesky God and Jesus characters.


      - Izzard

    11. Re:Ambilight is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  15. Turnips...IANA...but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "LCD and DLP rear projection TVs use entirely different technology, you muppet. if you want to be a techie, know WTF you are talking about."

    • ...a lawyer

      ...a businessperson

      ...an economist

      ...a politician

      ...a HCI expert





    1. Re:Turnips...IANA...but. by Spactonic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You forgot my plumber, who is exceedingly competent.

  16. Now we know where pillip is building there stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    China still uses the capacitor formula that they "aquired" from a japanense firm. Of course, the firm detected the theft and allowed the spy access to an old formula from the 60's. Sadly, the formula fails after about 2 years. Hence the reason why so many motherboards fail after just 2 years (capacitor leaks and arcs).

  17. No... by Kittie+Rose · · Score: 3, Funny

    Someone's been watching too many 90s Spider-man cartoons with Michael Morbius in them. Plasma is something found in blood, but it's also a kind of high energy gas.

    --
    EpiAdv - if you like Pokey the Penguin, try this comic!
    1. Re:No... by mink · · Score: 1

      "Someone's been watching too many 90s Spider-man cartoons with Michael Morbius in them."

      Wasn't he that Sleapwalker dude?

      --
      Well I've wrestled with reality for thirty five years doctor, and I'm happy to say I finally won out over it.
  18. proper safety protocol by megacia · · Score: 5, Funny

    As demonstrated by Mr. LaForge, proper safety protocol when dealing with plasma is the same in the 24th century as today: stop, drop and roll under the door.

    1. Re:proper safety protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, that happened in another timeline, and thus didn't happen.

  19. What the by maelstrom · · Score: 1

    Yeah, no other type of TV uses caps.

    --
    The more you know, the less you understand.
  20. it's supposed to do that! by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 0
    It's a feature.

    It's meant to switch the TV off, and scour the surrounding area after prolonged use.

  21. Oh, hell... by k4_pacific · · Score: 4, Funny

    What is it with people these days, back in my day, I had a 21" black and white console Zenith TV that caught fire once. Yup, one of the wax capacitors arced over and up she went. I blasted it with a dry chemical extenguisher and replaced the bad capacitor with some rolled up wax paper and alumninum foil and she still worked!! Hell, I'd still be using it if Rexall still carried vacuum tubes. The 6U8A that drives the sound went out, and I don't have a glass blowing kit to make a new one. Product safety, hummmpphhh!! Damn yuppies.

    --
    Unknown host pong.
    1. Re:Oh, hell... by unitron · · Score: 1
      "The 6U8A that drives the sound went out, and I don't have a glass blowing kit to make a new one."

      You can make a new electrolytic out of Cut-Rite and Reynolds Wrap but you couldn't use the old tube base, stick in a dropping resistor for the filament string and an FET and some resistors for the triode? :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    2. Re:Oh, hell... by k4_pacific · · Score: 1

      Dammit, I never thought of that!! Where's my hammer?

      --
      Unknown host pong.
  22. Looking it up isn't enough - you need to use logic by non-sequitur · · Score: 1

    While RoHS does call for the elimination of the fire retardents you've listed, it in now way should be interpreted as to exclude ALL fire retardents. Not all fire retardent additives are polybromides.
    Those are plentiful, effective, and cheap. But there are others.

    In general, government authorities do not regulate against immediate safety in favor of environmental (long term safety) unless there is a viable alternative.
    Usually (but not always), the regulation is deemed necessary to overcome the economic incentive to keep using the commonly accepted materials and methods.

    But, if you acknowledge the logical reality, you can't "edumacate" and call other people "beyatch".

  23. slightly offtopic -- that whole Ambilight concept by timothy · · Score: 1

    It seemed silly to me at first, but now that I've seen it a few times, I actually like this Ambilight thing. Now, with the caveat that *I* am unqualified to do this, and am only making an idle observation, it seems that a PC with webcam (webnbcam pointed at your LCD panel TV) and an LED array behind the panel would make it a reasonable proposition to recreate this effect. (Software on the PC would analyze the image from the webcam to see what dominant color should be ordered up from the LED arrray ...

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  24. Too Hot for TV by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if all these sets were tuned into the "Teen Sex Orgy" on Without a Trace when this happened.

  25. Could be worse ... by rlp · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least it's not one of those hazardous TV's with three guns that shoot beta particles at you!!

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Could be worse ... by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 0

      I always wondered if you could make a cool ray gun with one of those, and why noone has.

    2. Re:Could be worse ... by 2008 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I always wondered if you could make a cool ray gun with one of those, and why noone has.

      Because the electrons can only go about 10 cm in air. They bounce off the air molecules, lose energy, and stop.
      This is why we use a vacuum tube in CRTs like TVs, if there was air in them you wouldn't get a picture. It's not just for the fun implosions.

      --
      I quit!
    3. Re:Could be worse ... by (negative+video) · · Score: 1
      This is why we use a vacuum tube in CRTs like TVs, if there was air in them you wouldn't get a picture.
      Heh. You'd get a picture alright, drawn on thin air! The blue glow of Cerenkov radiation is so soothing...
    4. Re:Could be worse ... by 2008 · · Score: 1

      That is a really cool idea. Not so good for TV pictures but... well lets just say I'm off to patent an electron beam + fishtank Cherenkov nightlight :)

      --
      I quit!
    5. Re:Could be worse ... by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 1

      But you have to admit that the implosions are pretty sweet.

    6. Re:Could be worse ... by Wellspring · · Score: 1

      Turn it bright enough and watch it long enough and you soon won't need it at all-- your fish will soon start glowing of their own accord.

    7. Re:Could be worse ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Implosion?!?

  26. Never heard of TV's catching fire? by spaceturtle · · Score: 1

    I heard they were the second most likely thing to cause fires, after heaters.

  27. Caps go sometimes. by dbc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, sometimes caps go.

    A few years back, one of the big-two makers of the electrolytic paste put out bad goop for several months. This paste found its way to several manufacturers of high quality capacitors. These caps found their way into PC mobo's, and there was a spate of in-the-field capacitor failures in certain motherboards. Some name-brand makers of high quality mother boards got bit by that one. (My then-employer included.) No flames, though. These caps were being operated entirely within spec, but were fabricated with out-of-spec paste.

    Caps that are pushed beyond their ratings will go. Sometimes, their are transient voltages the designer didn't account for that cause caps to be operating beyond their rating.

    I remember oh... about 25 years ago when the TI "Silent 700" thermal printing terminal with built-in acoustic modem was the Bee's Knees. No shit, we all coveted those babies. Way better than an ASR33. Anyway, I was working in the cube next door to one guy that was cranking away on a Silent 700. For some odd reason, it was a period of dead silence among the 16 code monkeys in that area. There was a loud *BANG* and then a "Woah" from the user when a fairly large 'lytic released it's magic smoke(*). A rather spectacular amount of smoke, as I recall, since it was a large cap. A memorable occasion.

    About 20 years ago at a startup company, we had just gotten the first prototype PC boards for the first product. The boards were the first of the design, using a brand new CAD system tool flow. The entire company (all 16 people) gathered in the lab for the power-on ceremony. Anyway, with the whole company watching, the VP of Eng flips the big red switch, and -- *BANG* -- along with lots of smoke. Now, the engineers were in their glory, fanning the smoke away with notepads and laughing like drunken sailors. The newly hired VP of Finance turned white as a sheet. The Pres. got a frozen smile on his face and mumbled something encouraging. He told me later he was thinking about how much money he could get for the furniture at liquidation. Turns out, with several brand new untried cad tools in the tool flow, the silk screen for one type of electrolytic had the polarity backwards, and so those caps had been stuffed backwards. A trival, but spectacular bug.

    And then, in college, after a couple of brews my roomie and I decided to strip out the electrolytic caps from a worthless transistor radio, plug them into the end of an extension cord, and lower them out the window to the room blow, plug in the extension cord, and let them go *BANG* outside the window of the room below. Yes, sometimes caps go.

    (*) The magic smoke theory of electronics: All components run on factory inserted magic smoke. This is easy to prove, as sometimes you will see a component rupture and release its magic smoke. It never works again after that. Therefore, all electronic components require magic smoke in order to operate.

    1. Re:Caps go sometimes. by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I had one of those motherboards with the bad caps. The top end of some of the caps sort of split open a bit, and goop oozed out, hardening over the split. It worked fine for years, until one day I went into lab and one of my coworkers told me there was a horrible burning smell when he got there that morning. That particular computer had died, and when I opened it up, I found that the mobo had indeed caught fire for a brief moment.

      Back in undergraduate circuits lab, we had to build the power supply for a modular breadboard kit. The PS kit gave you pretty much only the parts you needed, with no spares, and the electronics shop at that time was only open a couple days out of the week. So, about 10pm, a bunch of us were working on our kits, when from the other end of the bench I was working at comes a BANG! I look over, and there was a poor guy looking dumbfounded at his kit, knowing that because he had soldered a cap in backwards, he wouldn't be able to finish until after the weekend.

      On a side note: Magic smoke, though vital for the operation of any electronic device, is actually odorless. The burning smell that comes from exploded parts is actually added afterwards, like mercaptan is added to natural gas. It's there to warn people that an electronic device has given up the ghost, and it is manufactured from the blood, sweat, and tears of the engineer who designed the part.

    2. Re:Caps go sometimes. by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1
      And then, in college, after a couple of brews my roomie and I decided to strip out the electrolytic caps from a worthless transistor radio, plug them into the end of an extension cord, and lower them out the window to the room blow, plug in the extension cord, and let them go *BANG* outside the window of the room below.

      Sounds like a fun prank, When I was a kid I took a large cap out of something and wired it up to my model railroad transformer; I counted the seconds ("one-one-thousand, two-one-thousand..") and at exactly "ten" (I swear) it blew with a loud band and sent a large volume of fuzzy white stuff all over my room. My mom ran in yelling "What the hell???"; that was funny.

      You can often fix those bad motherboards; I desoldered the bad cap and soldered in a good replacement on a co-worker's Abit PIII motherboard, and he says it's worked fine since.

      --
      We apologize for the inconvenience.
    3. Re:Caps go sometimes. by chgros · · Score: 1

      You're probably referring to this;

    4. Re:Caps go sometimes. by evilviper · · Score: 1
      You can often fix those bad motherboards; I desoldered the bad cap and soldered in a good replacement on a co-worker's Abit PIII motherboard, and he says it's worked fine since.

      That works if the cap went open. If the cap shorted, then it's destroyed other components in the process.

      Personally, I returned my motherboard to MSI (about 4 years outside of warranty) and they replaced it with a much newer, much more expensive model, which I'm using right now...
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    5. Re:Caps go sometimes. by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1
      That reminds me of our old Data General Nova 2, which was still running in the late 1980's. We were always replacing components, including the whopping 8K of magnetic core (that ran a few grand).

      Anyway, one day the tech was over working on it with me late at night. He sealed it up and plugged it in, then hit the power switch. There was a high pitched whine that increased in pitch and volume, and then BANG!, and we were choking on the magic smoke. The cap had blown - and it was huge, easily as big as a can of hairspray. The tech looked at it sadly, then looked at me and said, "Well, it looks like we smoked it".

      I could never power it on after that without wincing...

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    6. Re:Caps go sometimes. by confused+one · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you can replace them... But I had about 15 bad caps on mine. Cost of parts + labor (and my times worth too much). It was not worth it. A cheap motherboard from a local shop and It was back up and running.

    7. Re:Caps go sometimes. by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      I believe you're referring to the recent theft of technologies for tantalum bypass capacitors: unfortunately, the technology thief didn't get all the details of the technology, and the result was a lot of failure-prone motherboards coming out of Taiwan and failing after less than a year in the field. Dell, in particular, had a problem with them but was very good about replacing the motherboards at the first sign of trouble. They got some good support reviews for dealing so well with something clearly not their fault.

    8. Re:Caps go sometimes. by jeroen94704 · · Score: 1

      >These caps found their way into PC mobo's, and there was a spate of in-the-field capacitor failures
      >in certain motherboards.

      That's funny, because it's exactly what happened here just last week. All the caps on a Dell motherboard blew out, and the tech that came in to fix it told me it was a known issue with that particular batch of mobo's.

      --
      He who laughs last, thinks slowest.
    9. Re:Caps go sometimes. by Suidae · · Score: 1

      You can often fix those bad motherboards; I desoldered the bad cap and soldered in a good replacement on a co-worker's Abit PIII motherboard, and he says it's worked fine since

      I've done that a number of times as well. Note that most MOBO's use lead-free solder which requires a bit hotter temp than regular lead solder and also tend suck heat away from the soldering point pretty quick. This can make it tedious to get capacitors out. Use a high-wattage iron (45 to 90W works pretty well) or pick up one of those butane irons (iron, not torch!) and crank it up.

    10. Re:Caps go sometimes. by smoker2 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I used to work for a company called AVX (part of the Kyocera group) where we made tantalum caps. When some of those went wrong, they were quite nasty.

      I remember seeing a Motorola phone that had some of our caps in and when they went, they made a nice black sqishy mess out of the phones back casing.

      Another thing about burning tantalum caps, the only thing that will put them out is salt. The manufacturing process is pretty involved with each cap taking about 1 to 2 weeks to go through all the processes. The chemicals were pretty shitty too. Phosphoric acid, glycolic acid, acetic acid, manganese and many other horrible mixtures. I remember one day I was working on the manganese section (Black dip) where the anodes were dipped into the manganese solution up to the shoulder, then blotted to remove excess fluid. After that, they went into an oven with a water bath for an hour. The dozy QA came walking round and was opening each oven door in turn and big clouds of green (highly toxic) smoke was pouring from the ovens. Apparently she was "checking that I had put water in the baths" ! I think she ended up in management...

      I'm glad I got away from that place.

    11. Re:Caps go sometimes. by PagosaSam · · Score: 1
      I know this is pretty late in this discusion, but I used to work on the line that made those old Silent 700s. Nearly every day one of the board would blow a cap. The caps were hand inserted and soldered and QA was famous for not noticing that the cap was inserted backwards. Most of the boards would fail spectacularly (sound of a 30-30 and a cloud of smoke) on first power up. Oddly, a few would not fail right away but later on in the burnin. I always wondered if some failed much later, after leaving the plant...

      I think the electrolite they were using must have been based on a fish oil, because the smell of rotten, burnt, fish always lingered. Yuch!

      --
      :q! Oh crap, not again...
  28. Re:Looking it up isn't enough - you need to use lo by alxkit · · Score: 1

    u must be from the academia! where i come from - every penny matters. and if i was a gambling man i'd say that someone fucked up and used up a bunch of cheap-ass materials. thus the recall. thus someone is getting fired. assumption? yes. but i'm going with my gut feeling.

  29. After further study... by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Funny

    It has been determined the real problem is that there is nothing on.

  30. Re:Looking it up isn't enough - you need to use lo by non-sequitur · · Score: 1

    No - you misunderstood - *I* am not suggesting that the RoHS law is good or bad - I'm simply pointing out to the OP that RoHS doesn't outlaw fire retardents, it only outlaws *some* fire retardents.

    "where I come from" is just as cost-sensitive. Successful business (esp in manufacturing) is largely about using the cheapest solution that's still effective. Not all costs are material.

    So, I don't know where you assumed that my explanation of the way these regulations come about can IN ANY WAY be interpreted as my endorsement of them. No, I'm not from academia. But I did attend.

  31. Re: Fire Retardant Material by SaidinUnleashed · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't think that term is politically correct.

    Shouldn't it be "ignition challenged" material?

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys.
  32. It's a "feature" by JRGhaddar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I use mine to roast marshmallows...

  33. They're Everywhere! by Zibara · · Score: 1

    The plasma......they're everywhere! Frogblast the Ventcore!

  34. Re:slightly offtopic -- that whole Ambilight conce by JVolkman · · Score: 1

    Someone has done something similar, but used photocells from RadioShack instead of a webcam.

    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=47 98540&&#post4798540
    http://www.avsforum.com/avs-vb/showthread.php?p=48 07796&&#post4807796 (pic)

  35. They already did... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...newest feature will be ambilight on four sides.

  36. Re: Fire Retardant Material by dlelash · · Score: 1

    How about "Differently Flammable"?

  37. Simply put? No safety anywhere. by NeuroManson · · Score: 1

    LCD panels: Backlight runs off of a high voltage supply to power the cold cathode tube, relying on capacitance based power supplies, depending on the company making it, and how cheap the components are, can burst into flames.

    Plasma: See above.

    DLP: See above.

    Television: Different tech, yes, but still see above.

    The quality of your product is based on the quality of the products put into it. If they're sub par, don't be surprised if it doesn't melt into a pile of plastic and glass.

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  38. Could you detail that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...just a bit further, I just got an Ambilight and experience the shutdown problem twice already. In order to do something about it, I would like to know a bit more about it. Is it easily repaired ? Does it occur more often when you use the set longer ? Can you prevent it somehow (apart from turning ambilight off) ?

    1. Re:Could you detail that... by tech10171968 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll see if I cn dig up that bulletin tonight but, in a word, not really. The repair involves parts only available from Philips (I spelled it right this time), and I don't think they're going to help you void your own warranty. Besides, most TVs (even plasmas) involve some very, very high-voltage circuits; if you don't know where they are (or what you're doing) then there's an even chance that you will no longer be among the living.

      --
      This space for rent!
    2. Re:Could you detail that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still interested, if you could drop a link to the bulletin here, that would be great !

  39. buzzing ambilight by Bender+Unit+22 · · Score: 1

    I hear some people complaning that their ambilight emits a buzzing sound after some time after getting the TV, could that be part of the same problem?

  40. Re:slightly offtopic -- that whole Ambilight conce by pe1chl · · Score: 1

    I have another type of Philips TV with ambilight, which I bought not because of ambilight but because of the very good picture quality on an LCD screen, but I should say the ambilight is a really nice feature indeed.
    Even though my set is not flat against a wall, but angled in a corner where it lights a wall and a curtain, it really gives a good effect, which astonishes especially when you turn it off and you notice what is missing.

    It also occurred to me that this must be easy to fabricate as an add-on to existing sets. However, I would not use a camera or other light sensor, but use the video-out from the TV to watch the average video brightness electronically. This should not be that difficult to do.

    (european TVs have SCART connectors which nearly always provide video-out. on a US TV with all those separate cinch connectors, it may be that video out is not so easily available)

  41. bad caps?! by bjoeg · · Score: 3, Informative

    How safe are LCD and DLP TVs from this type of thing?

    If I read the article correct, the products are just as safe as any other product. Caps arcing has been seend for ages and is a "common" problem. Here at work, we got old computers dieing every month due to caps.

    Just check out http://www.badcaps.com/

  42. Re: Caps by macaroo · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the good ole days of HV CRTs with the 20KV supporting power supplies. You would be watching TV and suddenly hear a large snap or crack. You know it was time to break out the vacuum cleaner and clean out the accumulation of dust into the unit. BTW good article on the defective cap problem on computer motherboards. I run a repair business and have personally seen this problem many times. I have a website that goes into detail about the problem and sells recapping kits for computer motherboards. It is a shame when a +$100 motherboard stops working for the want of a 50 cent part. The biggest problem I have is soldering the new caps on these multi layered boards. I have a hand drill with a needle bit to ream out the hole as my soldering tools can't put enough heat into the small area to clean out the holes. The ground and power layers suck up the heat too fast.

  43. Near misses and desensitization by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    How many times have I been around when an electronic device has failed catastrophically (loud noise and smoke?) That is, when the failure has occurred for some reason other than something I was doing? Twenty? Fifty?

    In none of these events did anything nearby catch fire. Fire extinguisher not needed, nothing required of me but the mourning of the dead device.

    That creates the illusion that these are riskless non-events. But that's always the with risks. One of the reason why accidents happen: we start to ignore the near misses because experience seems to show that they are harmless.

    Ever see what happens when the mechanism that turns off a toaster oven jams or fails? After a few minutes the continuous heating action of the elements causes the toast to outright catch fire. In another fraction of a minute, the flames from the burning toaster ignite the plastic components inside the toaster oven. At this point you have serious flames and clouds of black, evil-smelling smoke (that is probably not the healthiest stuff in the world to inhale). Now, suppose that toaster is on a kitchen counter underneath the edge of a wooden counter...

    That's as far as I've seen things go....

  44. IT crowd by Graemee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dear Sir stroke Madam.

    Fire, exclamation mark. Fire, exclamation mark. Help me, exclamation mark.
    123 Carlignton Road. Looking forward to hearing from you.

    All the best, Maurice Moss.

    1. Re:IT crowd by neafevoc · · Score: 1

      Four! I mean five! I mean FIRE!

      (Sorry, couldn't help myself. That show rocks.)

  45. Timing, people! by tbone1 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Having this come out during the opening weekend of the NCAA basketball tournament is not a way to endear your brand most Americans. You should try during an event that no one in this country cares about, like The Stanley Cup Finals or The World Series.

    --

    The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    1. Re:Timing, people! by Wolvie+MkM · · Score: 1

      Very true, given it's a toss up for me usually one which sleeping aid I should use, college basketball or competitive bowling.

      --
      I Like Pie...
  46. Probably not so uncommon by smchris · · Score: 1

    How safe are LCD and DLP TVs from this type of thing?"

    I suspect about as safe as any good design that is built with crap parts. Same as many of us who got Mexican Palm Pilots that bled the batteries in three or four days? Maybe capacitors are difficult to successfully cheapify?

  47. Correction... by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    a formula was stolen, and improperly formulated, by one of the big two.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague
    Cause of the failing capacitors
    The primary cause of these problems is industrial espionage gone wrong, with some Taiwanese electrolyte manufacturers using a stolen formula that was incomplete, and lacked ingredients needed to produce a stable capacitor.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  48. China components by gemtech · · Score: 1

    them there Chinese do a great job of knocking off components... NOT. I just got back from a 3 week business trip to China. We're pretty sure that they view component specifications as suggestions. They have the same view of traffic laws and sanitation practices, IMHO.

    --
    Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results. Albert Einstein
  49. By the way by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

    The only Ambilight model listed on Philips' website is a 42" LCD unit, not a plasma.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  50. "Ambilight" is certainly NOT a new idea..... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 3, Informative

    Although it was Sylvania, not Zenith, that pioneered this idea. And a few years prior to 1957, too...

    Beginning in 1952, some of their high-end sets incorporated a feature called "HaloLight", which was an illuminated bezel surrounding the CRT, designed to reduce eyestrain when watching the set in a dark room.

    Everything old is new again....

    --
    Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  51. DLP Backlight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Umm, DLP is a projection technology, there is no backlight.

    Plasma, like CRT, is a phosphor technology, so again, no backlight.

    It's not to say there are no capacitors or high voltages involved, but referring all your arguments to a backlight description is a bit misleading.

    1. Re:DLP Backlight? by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the light in a DLP set is, if I am not mistaken, usually a halogen incandescent bulb that just runs on line current. No fancy HV power supply required.

  52. Who edits this stuff? by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

    "damage was only sustained to the TVs..."

    That just makes my head hurt.

  53. Re:slightly offtopic -- that whole Ambilight conce by XMilkProject · · Score: 1

    It's substantially easier and less overkill to just catch the video output directly. Building them off of svideo or component is easy becuase the color signals are already seperated out for you. I made mine with svideo, but come to think of it you might be able to do it with component with hardly any components (no pun intended).

    --
    Big ones, small ones, some as big as yer 'ead!
    Give 'em a twist, a flick o' the wrist...
  54. Exploding capacitors from China by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wells Gardner (a major player in the arcare monitor business) had to recall several thousand of their units for a similar problem. It turns out that the high-grade capacitors the engineer spec'd for were substituted for cheap parts by a contractor.

    Result: 2-inch arcs from the flyback transformer to the capacitor. I have several of the carcasses under my bench, some have holes the size of golf balls burned through the boards.

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  55. Amateurs by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 1

    What a bunch of amateurs. When I first plugged in my lastest power supply design, the capacitor exploded.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  56. Yet, it's still the common wax candle.. by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

    Despite all of the potentially malfunctioning electronics in a given home, candles are still the leading cause (21%) of house fires in the USA.

    In this case, 'candles' includes other open-flame devices, like oil lamps, etc. Still, kind of ironic for 2006

    --
    There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
  57. Re:Looking it up isn't enough - you need to use lo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    u must B from AOL... LOLz0r, you ignorant motherfucker.

  58. Nice... by woolio · · Score: 1

    You managed to post the exact same thing twice and get modded up both times.... Nice job!

    OTOH, I wonder how long the patents on the HaloLight lasted.... Perhaps this is why we are seeing it again just now? [I haven't seen a Sylvania TV recently....]

    1. Re:Nice... by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      Sylvania TVs are still being made:

      http://www.sylvania.com/

      The brand is now owned by Osram. LOTS of old US consumer electronics brands are back on the market, under new ownership. Saw a "Curtis-Mathes" set in a newspaper ad the other day...

      Philips probably acquired any remaining patents on the halolight technology when THEY bought Sylvania back in the late 70s or early 80s, and folded it into "NAPCEC", or North American Philips Consumer Electronics Corp.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
  59. Re: Open Source Overlords by Nai7 · · Score: 1

    I for one would like to welcome our Open Source Overlords! And would like to remind you that as a closed source coder, can be usful in rounding up other closed source coders.

    Welcome!