Slashdot Mirror


eBay Looking for Allies Against Google

Vitaly Friedman writes "A report in the Wall Street Journal today talks about how eBay is looking for partners to defend against the growing threat of Google. Specifically, Google Base and the payment system in the works in Mountain View are seen as possible dangers to eBay's auctions and PayPal payment operations, says the report. Google Talk just throws some salt in the wounds by looking for a toehold in Skype's turf."

216 comments

  1. Shouldn't be hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Microsoft and Yahoo and AOL are obvious partners they could work with if they really see those as friendlier than Google

    1. Re:Shouldn't be hard. by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Indeed. eBay seems like the perfect place for MS to scam the public with vaporware.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Shouldn't be hard. by eneville · · Score: 1

      But doesn't/didn't Yahoo!(tm) use google for searches? Surely partnering /against/ your provider is a bad thing.

    3. Re:Shouldn't be hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yahoo did use Google for a short time, but they have their own search engine now.

  2. Re:I remember by stupidfoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Huh?

    So, you're saying that Steve Jobs should have stated that Google, a non-existant company, was the enemy?

  3. Whose wounds? by slofstra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Salt in the wounds". Whose wounds? Competition is a good thing for most of us.

    1. Re:Whose wounds? by crazyjeremy · · Score: 1

      Salt in the wounds for the company that doesn't want to lose their ecommerce monopoly. PayPal is big, but google money could get just as big very quick. No wonder eBay is worried.

    2. Re:Whose wounds? by Blazeix · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, Ebay is looking for allies, huh? They should Google for them.

    3. Re:Whose wounds? by flogic42 · · Score: 1

      Competition is good. May the best, cheapest service win. All this talk of "turf" is plutocratic garbage.

      --
      Check out my women's designer clothing store.
    4. Re:Whose wounds? by niteskunk · · Score: 1

      Indeed, the consumers are like kids in a candy shop with all these flavors of software to chose some. Gotta feel bad for the candymakers in such a cut-throat field.

    5. Re:Whose wounds? by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 0
      "PayPal is big, but google money could get just as big very quick."

      Please.

      People said this about Gmail and Google Talk, too. I'm guessing some of them said this about Google Pages. I'm using Gmail, but I still use AIM and my Google Page isn't in use.

      Some people will switch, some won't. People will use whatever they prefer.

    6. Re:Whose wounds? by slofstra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      According to the WSJ article, eBay faces a difficult conundrum. They are spending millions on targetted search ads on Google, thus helping out one of their direct on-line auction competitors. It's called co-opetition. Personally, I'm disaffected with Google's increasingly unreliable search results and tacky ads. Slashdot has developed a wonderful self-moderating model for it's forum. How about a self-moderating subject index for the web? Maybe as an add-on to wikipedia. In some ways Google reminds me of those German barons of old who were able to charge exorbitant tolls to those needing access to the few bridges across the Rhine. We need more good ways into the Internet, so more power to whatever anyone can come up with, including ask, wikipedia, altavista and msn. What do you think - who can challenge Google? What's the next flavour of the month?

  4. I for one welcome our Google payment overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I'll welcome anyone other than Paypal.

    1. Re:I for one welcome our Google payment overlords by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I would too, but not just for the usual reasons that are cited against PayPal. I don't use paypal for a lot of reasons, and one of them is that it is seen as unprofessional. (For example, a professional organization I belong to needs a way to take cc payments over the web, but is too small for a merchant acct. And PayPal makes you look like a doofus, like an aol email addy.) Because Google is so much "cooler" and trendier, it would be easier to get google payment adopted instead of PayPal. I have no idea why PayPal seems so hokey... Is it the name?

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    2. Re:I for one welcome our Google payment overlords by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 3, Informative
      I have no idea why PayPal seems so hokey... Is it the name?

      Apart from the usual barrage of reasons to not like paypal, they are hokey in exactly the same way as an AOL email. Anyone can get one, no technical or professional qualifications needed. It's impossible to seem in any way ahead of your competition with a system that a teenager can sign up for in ten minutes.

    3. Re:I for one welcome our Google payment overlords by robertjw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone can get one, no technical or professional qualifications needed.

      There are plenty of things out there that anyone can get, but don't seem as hokey as PayPal. gmail accounts, myspace accounts (in the right context), etc.. It has more to do with the kind of people that are involved in using the service. The vast majority of individuals using AOL are not regarded by the rest of us as very bright. They are either paying way too much for dial-up, or adding AOL costs to their broadband.

      I think PayPal has suffered from the same problem. Outside of eBay use, the only sites that have used it have been completely unprofessional in appearance. This gives us all a collective unprofessional opinion of PayPal. I actually think that PayPal's overall reputation has improved over the last several years and you see more and more legitimate sites using them. I'm not a particular fan of PayPal (even though my buddy Shuanqun works there), but they do fill a need. Competition will be good, reduce costs of both online payments and merchant accounts and hopelly legitimatize the service.

  5. paypal can eat shirt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope google mops the floor with paypal.

  6. Oh no! by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now we finally know what the "e" stands for in eBay. Yep you guessed it, "Evil". If you're not on Google's side you must be wrong.

    1. Re:Oh no! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 0, Redundant

      You're being sarcastic, but from what I've heard about Paypal, it is evil.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    2. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous+Poodle · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Umm, more like EGOTISTIC. eBay is now the online auction eqivalent of Microsoft, that they feel the need for protection speaks volumes of their worldview . . . .

    3. Re:Oh no! by moochfish · · Score: 1

      Notice that eBay uses a little e. They're only a little evil. Whereas Microsoft is just Evil.

    4. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i dont get it, why are so many people trying to hurt Google. I like google, and wouldn't know what to do on the internet if google wasn't there!.

      Im on google's side.

      Id rather search the net for 'creative art' then pay a crook for the 'creative art', lol

    5. Re:Oh no! by microbee · · Score: 1

      And of course we know what G stands for in Google.

    6. Re:Oh no! by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      just for the record, and the people who weren't around back then, the e stands for eco.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    7. Re:Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am confused. Microsoft has no "E" in their name to signify "Evil." Perhaps the "M" is for "Machiavellian."

    8. Re:Oh no! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I am confused. Microsoft has no "E" in their name to signify "Evil." Perhaps the "M" is for "Machiavellian."

      No, Microsoft has no "e" in their name because they're so Evil that they're also hiding the fact that they're horribly Evil.

    9. Re:Oh no! by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      That's why the people who work for MS refer to themselves as "Microsofties". It's really a code phrase for "Microsoft 'E'-s", where "E", of course, stands for "evil".

  7. I hope Google shit on ebay by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sick of essentially being blackmailed by people I buy stuff off who refuse to give me feedback until I've given them feedback, even though I've just paid them £100 for an item they are yet to post.

    And fucking the Katrina victims out of Something Awful's donations was the straw that broke the donkey's back.

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    1. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by LunaticTippy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That is an increasing problem. I've had an even worse variant of it:

      Seller sends defective product, drags replacing it out past the 30 day mark (so I can't get my money back no matter what) and then stops dealing with me. I checked the seller feedback and they had lots of mutual retractions, and every negative feedback they received (over a legitimate problem such as mine) was retaliated against with improper negative feedback.

      I decided to leave no feedback, didn't want the strike on my record.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    2. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I personally wish Paypal a quick, painful death for other reasons. However, freezing SomethingAwful's account was a prudent thing to do. With any major need for relief donations, there will be scammers looking to prey on people's generosity. Seeing as SA is not a registered relief fund, what guarantee did anyone have that the money would go where it should have? None. If SA wanted to help, they should have posted links or buttons to registered relief funds for their viewers to donate to, not taken the money into their own hands. Sorry, but SA was in the wrong and Paypal reacted accordingly.

    3. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by generic-man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Social networking services weren't made much less vapid by Google's ill-fated introduction of Orkut BETA. Your problems with eBay seem related to eBay users being jerks. What can Google do to combat the same behavior that is so ingrained in the on-line auction seller community, a community that strikes me as the next dimension of flea market vendors?

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Anonymous+Poodle · · Score: 1

      As a frequent seller on eBay, I always give feedback once item is paid for. I have run across sellers that holdout for feedback from buyers before they will respond in kind, but that seems backwards to me. If someone bought something from you, give them feedback. Feedback whoring does nobody any good . . . .

    5. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by damiangerous · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just never use your seller account to buy. No one cares about negative feedback for a buyer, so you're free to leave whatever feedback is appropriate without fear of retaliation.

    6. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      I'm an idiot, why didn't I think of this?

      I already have 2 paypal accounts since they charge a percentage of every transaction on my cc-enabled one.

      Thank you for the advice.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    7. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 1

      Seeing as SA is not a registered relief fund, what guarantee did anyone have that the money would go where it should have?

      Like, oh, American Red Cross and United Way, both of which take a cut for themselves?

    8. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by blueday4 · · Score: 0

      Yea i also feel a little stupid for not thinking of this idea. Reading comments finally pays off.

    9. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Like the Salvation Army, who as far as I know, do not.

    10. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately this is not a black and white issue. I've been selling on ebay since the site's inception, and have gone to a mirrored feedback policy myself. Reason being is that there are always users who will try feedback extortion (if you don't give me 15 off then I'll leave a neg). Then there are those users who neg you for items damaged in shipping. There are users who just want to fuck with you and will leave a neg with a positive comment ... "oh, sorry I must've did that by accident."

      In the 15 or so years I've been selling online (USENET & Prodigy) I know there are just certain categories you should probably avoid buying used from non-niche sellers: optics, watches, computer components, guitars and most audio equipment. Also, there are certain categories on ebay that are just going to attract more scum (both bidders and sellers) than others. Caveat Empor

    11. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by ksattic · · Score: 1

      There's an interesting entry about this in the unofficial eBay FAQ:

      http://upce.toffee.net/#FAQ7.3

      "Incidentally, one poster to upce was recently added to the blocked bidders list of a number of regulars for expressing the view that he would leave neutral feedback for any seller who didn't leave him feedback immediately following his payment being sent."

    12. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by tddoog · · Score: 1
      Good idea but that doesn't fix the root problem and is more cumbersome for the user.

      Why don't they just fix the service?

    13. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by vux984 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Possibly because having multiple active accounts is against ebay's terms of service.... :)

      Next you should just start selling yourself stuff and pumping your own feedback rating...of course that might look suspeicious so you'll need to open and nurture a whole network of accounts...

      Once you break one rule... why not all of them ?

    14. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Pollardito · · Score: 4, Funny
      Once you break one rule... why not all of them ?
      i thought pretty much the same thing to myself when i was driving home last night at 5 over the speed limit. so i cracked open a beer, and did some drive-by shootings near the local elementary school. i mean, c'mon, i was already speeding.
    15. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by LunaticTippy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Fuck their terms of service. They change constantly, every time I've had a problem (buyer or seller) it seems tilted against me, they have inserted so many fees over the years, they ruined half.com, and as soon as there is a viable alternative I'm gone.

      ebay would love for me to sell myself stuff. They get $.25 + 3% + 1.25% + 4% of every transaction. I get 2 feedback points that they generate for free. Heck, if everyone did this ebay'd make a trillion dollars.

      And as for breaking rules, every time something rubs me wrong I think of ways around it. They stop irritating me, I'll stop seeking a less painful path.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    16. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by boxfetish · · Score: 1

      Actually, the same entity is allowed to have 5 active accounts.

    17. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had a feeling someone would come along and score a few mod points with that angle... but still... there is a difference.

      Each of those crimes you outline is separate, would be charged as separate, and you'd be convicted and punished for each of them "separately". (even if all in one trial).

      The difference here is that the ToS is one "contract". Violating one term or all of them or doing it x50 has exactly the same net effect -- you trigger their reaction to cancel and ban your account(s) when they catch you, that's it. Once you've broken it you've pretty much exposed yourself to the maximum penalty. Breaking a few more of them doesn't really change anything.

      Better analagies would be is if you are already going 5 over the limit... why not 7 over? or 10? (But there is a limit ... at 150 over, you're breaking new laws, with higher consequences.)

    18. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by microbee · · Score: 1

      : I'm sick of essentially being blackmailed by people I buy stuff off who refuse to give me feedback until I've given them feedback, even though I've just paid them £100 for an item they are yet to post.

      So you think Google will make them better people?

      Wow, no wonder why their stock price is so high. There must be some serious human engineering done there.

    19. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Anonymous+Coward+Gra · · Score: 1

      I now wait a month before I leave feedback except for those that have already left me feedback. Too many people like you describe, especially newbies.

    20. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are allowed to have multiple accounts on ebay. You just aren't allowed to have them interact with each other (ie bid on your own items). Many people have 2 or more accounts.

    21. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Dr_LHA · · Score: 1

      They could just Escrow the money until feedback is left. If positive feedback is given, the money goes through, if negative is given the money is returned. After all the only requirement of the buyer is to actually pay for the goods, nothing else.

    22. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outstanding idea. Google - are you listening?

    23. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      What can Google do to combat the same behavior that is so ingrained in the on-line auction seller community, a community that strikes me as the next dimension of flea market vendors?

      Quite simply, they can require the seller to post feedback before the buyer. If the buyer sent you money according to your terms, then they've done the only thing they are required to do.

      As it stands, I have rarely had a seller post feedback until I have given positive first -- the one time I gave negative (since the item was not shipped for over 3 weeks, and repeated emails were not answered) the seller gave me a negative despite my paying withing 30 minutes of auction close and providing him with all the information necessary to ship.

      It's a big protection racket and there are nhumerous little shit-on-the-customer things like this all through the eBay process, not including the massive financial fraud that is Paypal (we know who you are but won't list you as verified until you give us permission to withdraw any amount of money from your bank account at our whim).

      eBay doesn't need allies against Google, they need to find a mortician with a big enough coffin to bury their corpse when Google gets an auction and payment system online. It'll take a few years to overcome inertia, but I can't wait for the day I can tell eBay/Paypal to go screw themselves the way they screw so many of their own customers.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    24. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      ebay would love for me to sell myself stuff. They get $.25 + 3% + 1.25% + 4% of every transaction.

      Unfortunately, you can't sell yourself.

    25. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by damiangerous · · Score: 3, Informative
      Possibly because having multiple active accounts is against ebay's terms of service.... :)

      No, it's not. In fact it's explicitly mentioned as acceptable.

    26. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a crazy idea: If you don't like the way it works, don't use it.

    27. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you can dress it up in a lot of ways but SA weren't scamming anyone and the only reason they were going via SA was to post out rewards to donators. And the only reason for Paypal was because SA were hit during the hurricane too. SA weren't a scam. Paypal incorrectly identified them as such. After this there wasn't a way of proving Paypal wrong. Where's the process? Could SA send ID details and prove he'd been lived in the same house for years. How do you prove Paypal wrong? (even Paypal's website feedback didn't work -- it's stacked against users, that's the point).

    28. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      I have a crazy idea, I'll use the best option available despite its (many, horrible) flaws, since it makes me money. Then, when a better option becomes available, I'll gladly switch to it and dance on the grave of eBay. I call that a win-win situation.

      Most products have flaws, bitching about them and even cheering competitors' products says nothing about the overall value of the product. Ask anyone who works in publishing what they think of Quark, and more importantly, how big of a party did they have the day they able to burn their last Quark install CD and switch to Adobe InDesign? Quark controlled the market and had no viable competitors, so we had to grin and bear it through most of the 90s. Now they spiral towards bankruptcy and every one of their customers is cheering on the Grim Reaper.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    29. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Yep. Someone else already pointed that out. I could have sworn, back when I signed up, that you were limited to one... but I can't prove that.

      Anyhow, its interesting to know they do actively support it. Thanks to both replies for setting the record straight.

    30. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must be stupid, I can't understand why "Google" are nice guys and others are "evil". Tired of the "google cult" moderators so posting as AC.

      Go figure.

    31. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by Pollardito · · Score: 1
      Yeah, I had a feeling someone would come along and score a few mod points with that angle... but still... there is a difference. Each of those crimes you outline is separate, would be charged as separate, and you'd be convicted and punished for each of them "separately". (even if all in one trial). The difference here is that the ToS is one "contract". Violating one term or all of them or doing it x50 has exactly the same net effect -- you trigger their reaction to cancel and ban your account(s) when they catch you, that's it. Once you've broken it you've pretty much exposed yourself to the maximum penalty. Breaking a few more of them doesn't really change anything. Better analagies would be is if you are already going 5 over the limit... why not 7 over? or 10? (But there is a limit ... at 150 over, you're breaking new laws, with higher consequences.)
      i look at it as a Letter of the Law vs Spirit of the Law issue. there's a speed limit because we need something in stone so that a policeman can pull over someone for driving like an idiot. 5 miles an hour over, 7 miles an hour over, and 150 over all violate the letter of that law. 5 miles an hour over may not violate the spirit of the law, because if you're in control and the people around you aren't put in a situation by your speed that they can't handle than it's "ok". 150 over, violates both the spirit and letter of the law, and probably the warranty on your engine.

      the OP was originally posting about using a second eBay account to overcome the fact that the seller of an item can hold the buyer hostage in order to get dishonest feedback. you analogized that to using two accounts to give feedback to yourself. both those actions violate the letter of the law that says you can't have two accounts, but clearly the spirit of the law is not to prevent people from giving honest feedback.

      my analogy of taking speeding as a gateway to drunken driving and random shootings was an exagerration, but i think yours was also
    32. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Sure you can. You just need to market it properly:

      Items that contain human hair (such as lockets) as well as skulls and skeletons that are used for medical purposes may be listed on eBay.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    33. Re:I hope Google shit on ebay by RantRant · · Score: 1

      When I sell stuff on ebay I generally wait for the buyer to leave feedback before I do.

      I do this to make sure they get the item and everything is OK. The transaction isn't done until then. If they receive the item and there are issues then they should be resolved before I leave feedback.

  8. Re:I remember by servognome · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, you're saying that Steve Jobs should have stated that Google, a non-existant company, was the enemy?

    Yes, if he truly was a visionary ;)

    --
    D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  9. One good outcome of Google Payments.. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is that eBay will be forced to stop screwing their customers http://www.paypalsucks.com/ and improve their service.

    Oh the joys of competition.

  10. Ahah! by fatduck · · Score: 1

    Finally, a tech company that will pay handsomely for my military skills when I get out. But how will I lead my commando team against the Axis-of-Do-No-Evil without being spotted on Google Earth? Confound it!

    --
    Making you think you're crazy is a billion dollar industry.
    1. Re:Ahah! by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 1
      Finally, a tech company that will pay handsomely for my military skills when I get out. But how will I lead my commando team against the Axis-of-Do-No-Evil without being spotted on Google Earth? Confound it!

      I wouldn't worry too much about it. Google's maps are so outdated that my development shows up as nothing but a bulldozed 300 acre plot of land. They're at least 2 or 3 years out of date.

    2. Re:Ahah! by 1point618 · · Score: 1

      Ummm....

      I'd be more worried about their tracking your movements based on where you log into your gmail address from.

    3. Re:Ahah! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      But how will I lead my commando team against the Axis-of-Do-No-Evil without being spotted on Google Earth?

      Put your commando team somewhere outside the USA, Great Britain or Japan. Poof - you're invisible!

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  11. Interesting... by cp.tar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, eBay is afraid of Google.

    I've heard many complaints so far about both eBay and PayPal - could it be that they feel Google's service will be beta^Hter?

    So see if I care... they can get all the partners they want, but if Google rolls out a superior service, they can either adapt or go sulk in the corner.

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  12. Ally? We don't need no stinkin ally! by MudButt · · Score: 1

    You don't need an ally. Just build a better widget! How do you think Google, Linux, etc. came from being an underdog?

    1. Re:Ally? We don't need no stinkin ally! by Stop+Error · · Score: 1
      You don't need an ally. Just build a better widget! How do you think Google, Linux, etc. came from being an underdog?
      Last time I checked, Linux is still and underdog.
      --
      No keyboard detected. Press any key to continue.
    2. Re:Ally? We don't need no stinkin ally! by MudButt · · Score: 2

      Last time I checked, Linux is still and underdog.

      Underdog, fiscally maybe, but money was never the driving factor for OSS. In terms of a usable, alternative, stable, easy to use OS, Linux is definately no longer an underdog. (IMHO).

    3. Re:Ally? We don't need no stinkin ally! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But when you're a company like Ebay or Microsoft or Sony, building a better widget just isn't possible for whatever reason (costs too much, corporate culture/management discourages true innovation, etc.), so it's better to try to use other means of competing, like creating artificial barriers that prevent customers from defecting.

    4. Re:Ally? We don't need no stinkin ally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure what drugs you are using, but they are definatly working.

      It has less than 3% of the market... I don't care if Linux can produce trees that grow money... Linux is the underdog.

    5. Re:Ally? We don't need no stinkin ally! by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      Umm. . . next time you come across a word you don't understand, like "fiscally", look it up in the dictionary before you reply to prevent yourself from looking like a dumbass.

      Parent was just saying that we in the OS community don't care about market share or how much money companies make off it - especially since most of us don't ever see a dime of it.

    6. Re:Ally? We don't need no stinkin ally! by pushkar_t · · Score: 1

      Is it not the same strategy as instead of exesing we go to a docter or friend for advice which we already know?

  13. Re:I remember by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a world we would live in where we were all forced to use xfig to draw pictures, use pine and emacs, and program in Lisp and plain ole C! I don't know if that would be good or bad. Would the average human be better off if they knew how to use grep ?

  14. God forbid eBay would clean up its own act by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a. How about bringing back a real archive of auction results. Not the crummy 2 week limit in place now.
    b. Penalize bulk category flooders. Some categories are filled with sellers listing the same item over and over again. They should be forced to use the bulk option.
    c. 0 rated sellers should not be allowed to list without verified bank account/address info.
    d. Allow sellers to set feedback threshold restrictions on buyers.
    e. Finally, ebay should stop spamming its own users with "deals" and credit card offers.

    1. Re:God forbid eBay would clean up its own act by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1
      Exactly - All ebay has to do is implement the flood of feature requests it's been getting and then it will be the 'better' choice. The only reason I stopped using AltaVista and started using Google was Google was better. As long as ebay stays 'better' people will keep using it.

      (My ebay pet peeve? A seller should be forced to leave buyer feedback in order to receive payment. Once I pay I've help up my end of the bargain and should get my feedback immediately. Period.)

    2. Re:God forbid eBay would clean up its own act by mmell · · Score: 3, Funny
      . e. Finally, ebay should stop spamming its own users with "deals" and credit card offers.

      Oh, good . . . I was worrying that the e-mail I responded to with my credit card and social security numbers might have been a phishing scam. Good to see that it may have really been from E-Bay after all.

      Q: How do you tell a genuine E-Bay e-mail from a phishing scam?

      A: The phishing scam will probably cost less!

    3. Re:God forbid eBay would clean up its own act by Otter · · Score: 1
      How about bringing back a real archive of auction results. Not the crummy 2 week limit in place now.

      I agree with the rest of your proposals, but if I were E-Bay, absolutely no way I would do this.

    4. Re:God forbid eBay would clean up its own act by eclectro · · Score: 1

      You can actually turn off the spamming in the email preferences. It's buried somewhere, but it is there.

      Also, there could be a dozen other points (like redress for those that have been ripped off in the early days of ebay when they refused to do anything at all).

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    5. Re:God forbid eBay would clean up its own act by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Just curious, why?

      Disks are cheap. It's a helpful feature, looking for rarely-listed items to see if there is any market, get an idea of price.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    6. Re:God forbid eBay would clean up its own act by SlayerofGods · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My biggest pet peeve with them is crap being in the wrong category. It makes it such a chore to look for something to buy.
      For example lets go with wholesale lots of PCs
      The first 20 results are single buy laptop computers and then we have

      TEKTRONIX 840 850 860 AUXILLARY 500 SHEET PAPER TRAY
      100 x Antistatic Anti Static Bags ESD (6"x9")
      MAKE OVER £1000 A WEEK ON EBAY (100% PROFIT)
      Mystery Box Of Computers
      3 more single computers.
      LAPTOP REPAIR BUSINESS OPPORTUNITY
      Wholesale Lots- Buy Computers and MAKE A LOT OF MONEY !

      I mean holy shit, this reads more like spam then things to buy.
      And it goes on and on and on like this.

      --

      Technology, the cause of and solution to all of life's problems.
    7. Re:God forbid eBay would clean up its own act by tddoog · · Score: 1

      My own pet peeve/feature request is it costs too damn much. They probably would be reluctant to change that unless Google gives them some competition. I prefer to use Craigslist whenever possible.

    8. Re:God forbid eBay would clean up its own act by djmurdoch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      f. And they should try offering "Customer Service" in response to questions/complaints.

      I received a "free listing for new sellers" offer, listed an item at too high a price, and it didn't sell. After the auction, someone who had been asking questions during the auction wrote to me to ask if I would re-list it at a lower price. E-bay would not let me respond to the question, because I had "exceeded my daily limit of messages". I never did get a straight answer about what the limit was, just that I could raise it by giving them my credit card information. I had a "conversation" with 5 or 6 different monkeys passing me boilerplate FAQ answers, but never any answers to the questions I actually asked.

    9. Re:God forbid eBay would clean up its own act by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I hate this stuff. I often look for cisco stuff on ebay and I find stuff listed as:
      Dlink - NOT CISCO OR LINKSYS

      pure keyword spamming, its against their ToS, but do they do anything? No. Because they make money on it. Ebay has been consumed by its own greed, the sooner people see that and leave it so that its nothing but 20 wholesalers from "Hong Kong, Canada" (I absolutely detest that crap, when I search for North America, I want results from North America) and they can sell their crap to each other.

  15. Well... by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe if Paypal didn't confiscate its customers' money at will, they wouldn't have this problem.

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paypal really sucks..so does their Customer support.. I have seen people shouting at Paypal due to problems arising out of using it at ebay.. I use it to get payments for freelancing works, nothing else. Even though i dont use ebay, i have experienced the worst side of paypal already. huh!. Their security sucks. they dont even provide basic security like showing when you did your last login. Possibly, even showing the logs of logins can be a good call. This can reduce the *fraud* considerably.

      A good example of their customer support:
                  I live in India(yes!). I withdrew a check. It didnt reach me even after a month. I called their customer support number (doh! it was NOT a toll free number). I had to hear their ebay advertisements over the number at their cost. THIS IS BAD. make your customers pay for hearing your ads..thats the worst way you can display yourself.

      People "deserve" much better service than Paypal...

  16. Eventually there will be free online payment by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 1

    Paypal scrapes a % of your money for every transfer and they're making standard bank interest. If competition seeps in, they'll aim for the lowest fees. More competition is better for the consumer now.

    1. Re:Eventually there will be free online payment by fatalfury · · Score: 1

      exactly. eBay is just upset that their monopoly will be threatened. i also welcome the competition.

  17. Ebay Vs.Google by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can I be against both?

    --
    Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    1. Re:Ebay Vs.Google by Sqweegee · · Score: 2, Funny

      The enemy of my enemy is my friend....

    2. Re:Ebay Vs.Google by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      so wouldn't that make him both the friend and enemy of both services???

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    3. Re:Ebay Vs.Google by humble.fool · · Score: 1

      Methinks the term is: "Whoever wins, we pay more."

      --
      Being anonymous is not cowardice.
    4. Re:Ebay Vs.Google by sunwolf · · Score: 1

      Are you Chinese?

  18. Re:I remember by Feminist-Mom · · Score: 1, Informative

    Actually he said something like "Will Big Blue dominate the entire computer industry... the entire information age, was George Orwell right about 1984?"

    I think it was kinda linked to the commercial.

  19. China by IflyRC · · Score: 1

    So with Google and their support of China...does this mean when I go to purchase a product using Google Pay that the cost will be calculated in Chinese yaun?

    1. Re:China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody's laughing

  20. I remember when Wal-Mart was young . . . by mmell · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I actually was willing to drive an hour to shop at Wal-Mart; there was nothing even remotely like it in the major cities.

    I actually was willing to learn to type "http://www.google.com" instead of "http://www.altavista.com" to search on Google; even from the outset, no other search engine came close to their level of quality (read: good search results).

    Nowadays, Wal-Mart routinely grinds competition unto the dust. Woe betide the small businessman whose future neighbor is a Wal-Mart Supercenter. They're big, monopolistic, anti-competitive, predatory . . . all of the wonderfully evil traits which characterize success in our free enterpise system. This makes them fairly well hated, the price of success.

    Nowadays, Google is percieved as the ultimate digital destructor - crushing internet opposition wherever it rises, brutally redefining markets and networking in that fashion most likely to lead to their own growth and the demise of competing technologies.

    Either you love free enterprise or you hate it - either way, I wouldn't trust it!

    1. Re:I remember when Wal-Mart was young . . . by crzrsn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah... except everything which Google does is FREE!

    2. Re:I remember when Wal-Mart was young . . . by Yolegoman · · Score: 1

      I actually was willing to learn to type "http://www.google.com" instead of "http://www.altavista.com" to search on Google

      Dude, have you ever heard of a bookmark?

    3. Re:I remember when Wal-Mart was young . . . by jb.hl.com · · Score: 1

      Nowadays, Google is percieved as the ultimate digital destructor - crushing internet opposition wherever it rises, brutally redefining markets and networking in that fashion most likely to lead to their own growth and the demise of competing technologies.

      Yeah, that's why GMail is the world's biggest webmail service, MSN Messenger and Skype died in the face of Google Talk, Google News is the world's favourite news source...

      Face it; Google's strength is in search. That's it.

      --
      By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
    4. Re:I remember when Wal-Mart was young . . . by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with crushing opposition as long as all your customers like you and don't miss the opposition. I certainly don't miss Altavista, and I love Google's services. As long as Google's services are excellent, I'm not going to care that their competition has withered away. And unlike some monopolists, it seems that Google doesn't use any sideways, evil methods of killing their competition; they simple make better software, everyone uses it, and abandons the competition.

      The problem with monopolists is when they stagnate, but also use their power to unfairly destroy new competition. I haven't seen that with Google yet.

    5. Re:I remember when Wal-Mart was young . . . by dmitrygr · · Score: 1

      Google has my trust unless they prove they do not deserve it. Until then I'd trust them to watch my dog for the weekend. Point is: Microsoft and their Hotmail, eBay and their PayPal, as well as most other Google's competitiors have a record for playing dirty. Be it having to pay $15,000.00 to be un-black-listed on hotmail, or losing $2,000 in frozen PayPal accounts, it is bad history. Google has no such bad history, and I chose to give them my trust. I will reconsider when I am in the least bit unsatisfied, or hear of some problem that concerns me. Till then they are Good and Microsoft,eBay,Skype...are Evil.

      --
      -------
      1. Enjoy your job
      2. Make lots of money
      3. Work within the law

      Choose any two.
  21. Paypal alternative? by heresyoftruth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would jump on a paypal alternative. I juat want to use my online payment service to buy adult goods along with the non adult goods. I hate that Paypal makes a distinction, and doesn't allow that. The alternatives for payment for adult goods just aren't widespread enough to use, in my opinion.

    --
    Nothing hides evidence like a stew. -Gus Pratt
    1. Re:Paypal alternative? by BravoZuluM · · Score: 1

      It is not just adult goods, but anything that PayPal deems sinful; alcohol, guns, dating sites...ect. If PayPal wants to be taken seriously, they need to let an individual purchase anything that cash would purchase. If Google does that, good bye Paypal.

      M

    2. Re:Paypal alternative? by heresyoftruth · · Score: 1

      I agree. If Google provided an option that didn't put the same types of 'moral judgements' on my purchases Paypal did, then I would jump ship in a heartbeat.

      --
      Nothing hides evidence like a stew. -Gus Pratt
    3. Re:Paypal alternative? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      If Google provided an option that didn't put the same types of 'moral judgements' on my purchases Paypal did, then I would jump ship in a heartbeat.

      You might be waiting a while. Google allows advertising for gambling and porn in spite of their clearly stated policy against it, but steadfastly refuses to allow advertisements for firearms/ammunition and tobacco (among other things). So, I would not be surprised in the least if Google's service would make different but equally discriminatory 'moral judgements' regarding what kinds of business they will allow to be conducted through their service.

      I personally take their "do no evil" mantra with a very large grain of salt.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    4. Re:Paypal alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely, PayPal does not need allies, they need common sense. With common business sense they would realize that adult business is huge and currently under-served by a multitude of scamming bit players. I bet all of the adult webmasters would change to PayPal if they could - I sure would. Google, hear this: support adult business and in five years you will rule the online payment space. One more thing Google, make deals with the online authentication vendors. We do not need credit card specific security solutions - we need one to rule them all.

    5. Re:Paypal alternative? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They seem capable of not judging China. If they were at least consistent, they would stop judging businesses for selling legal goods and services. Google, "do no evil" does not mean preach your narrow minded morals. Come on Google, do good by taking the high ground of NOT preaching.

    6. Re:Paypal alternative? by JoeAmerica · · Score: 1

      I agree, me too. PayPal is annoying because centralizing your online payments is impossible. Their policy is too limiting. Requires you to have your credit card number in too many databases.

    7. Re:Paypal alternative? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      Excellent post.

      I now require two things:

      - An example of an ad for gambling. Instructional material, and play money sites don't count.

      - A citation for Google having a policy against Adult ("porn") ads.

      thanks.

      Oh. You don't have these? Oh.

    8. Re:Paypal alternative? by smallfries · · Score: 1

      - An example of an ad for gambling. Instructional material, and play money sites don't count.

      Just search for poker. I get three ads across the top for real-money sites, and a chunk down the side.

      But I don't understand why this is a big deal. Google don't have a policy on banning adverts based on what they sell. If you look at the Screened Products section in the adwords faq you'll find the phrase 'Specifically, we currently monitor the following in ad text and keywords:', not 'We do not allow...' In order words, they reserve the right to reject advertising of certain products, but they don't say what they are. They give a list of categories (including gambling and porn) that they *may* reject if they feel like it.

      Going off topic a bit, why should Google have a problem with gambling? It's perfectly legally in most of the countries that they serve with search, the WTO has decided that it should come under free trade, and other than some dead words from an obsolete religion, there is no reason that it should be restricted.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    9. Re:Paypal alternative? by NormalVisual · · Score: 2, Informative

      From https://www.google.com/adsense/policies, since you so nicely asked:

      Site Content

      Site may not include:

      * Excessive profanity
      * Violence, racial intolerance, or advocate against any individual, group, or organization
      * Hacking/cracking content
      * Illicit drugs and drug paraphernalia
      * Pornography, adult, or mature content
      * Gambling or casino-related content

      ...and a bunch of other stuff...

      Now granted, this is for their AdSense program and not for AdWords, but it still points to an inconsistent application of what they do and don't find acceptable. I'm not allowed to run porn or gambling ads via AdSense on my own site, but Google apparently has no problem running them on the main search results.

      An example of a gambling site that can be found in Google's search results is here. It's free to play, but don't think for a moment that they're not attracting traffic by virtue of the opportunity to win $10,000 in their "tournament", which is still gambling in spirit at the very least.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    10. Re:Paypal alternative? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      It is not gambling if someone does not have to risk money in order to win it. That is the definition of gambling.

      AdSense and AdWords are quite unrelated in this aspect.

      Google opens themselves up to liability by allowing its advertisements to be shown on potentially illegal (in your region_of_choice) adult/gambling sites.

      A crackdown has already begun on gambling affiliates, Google wants no part of that.

      Secondly, Google does not allow gambling and adult ads to be shown in the content network. This means that properly targeted adult/gambling sites publishing AdSense would *have no ads to show anyway*.

      Makes sense, right?

    11. Re:Paypal alternative? by michaelhood · · Score: 1

      Don't be confused, Google has no morals - it is a publicly traded company with a goal of profit.

      If they thought they could run more ads with no repercussions, they'd be all over it.

      The fact is, they probably can't. I'm sure it's drawn much debate within the Googleplex, but the general consensus is that there are many types of ads that could negatively affect the general AdWords experience.

      The secret key to the AdWords recipe is CTR - Click-through Rate.

      If Advertiser A is willing to pay $10/click, but only gets a 1% CTR, Google's EPM for that advertiser would be only $100.

      If Advertiser B is only willing to pay $1/click, but has a targeted ad drawing a 14% CTR - Google's EPM is $140.

      So now they made 40% more AND didn't waste an important ad slot AND provided a better user experience.

      A better user experience means MORE people look for their place to click within the screen-region of AdWords, providing an even higher overall CTR.

      If you look at some heat maps for Google searches, on most commercialized SERPs (result pages) - their CTR is well over 23%.

      This means is the average CPC (cost per click) is [!random example!] $0.55, they are earning an average $126.50 EPM.

      Google does 91M searches/day (source).

      91,000,000 / 1000 = 91,000. 91k * $126.5 = $11,511,500.

      Oh, yeah.. this doesn't include the content network, or the domain network, or search partners (AOL, Ask.com, et al).

      $$$

  22. Best ally against google by phy_si_kal · · Score: 1

    Next ally? Don't wait any longer and hire some nigerians to fill google base with some brand new laptops and dslrs.

  23. kind of funny... by ssand · · Score: 1

    Considering that no matter what you search on Google you get an EBay ad, it's funny that they are then fighting against google, who provides a huge portion of their advertisement.

  24. just wait by vee_voojagig · · Score: 5, Funny

    can't they just wait until steve ballmer f***ing kills google

  25. sniff.. by jspectre · · Score: 1

    and i should feel sorry for ebay why?

    the answer is simple. compete. offer more, better, cheaper, faster, and easier than google does.

    good luck ebay!

    --

    abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz

  26. Ebay's UI & Search Stinks by comforteagle · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I setup a tagging system for ebay last night using the scuttle bookmarking application: fyndr.com. ebay's UI is just too brutal to deal with and top down from sellers to buyers. Also, and I couldn't believe this, but ebay charges for categorizing products in more than a few, limited, categories... making products harder to find! coo coo!

    Between the cleaner UI of a bookmarking system, the tagging, and purposefully active userbase I'm hoping fyndr can put a, yeah yeah, web2.0 face on the old web1.0 beast.

    1. Re:Ebay's UI & Search Stinks by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      Also, and I couldn't believe this, but ebay charges for categorizing products in more than a few, limited, categories... making products harder to find! coo coo!

      Thats actually there as a preventative step against spamming your wares as everything under the sun. If they didn't do this, people would be ticked off about no category control and inaccurate product listings to a much larger degree.

    2. Re:Ebay's UI & Search Stinks by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      I doesn't bother me that you can only pick one category for free. What does bother me is you sometimes have multiple categories for the same thing.

      For example there is a Car Audio section under Consumer Electronics and a Car Audio section under eBay Motor. People to the search in two places to find what they are looking for.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    3. Re:Ebay's UI & Search Stinks by damiangerous · · Score: 1

      Social bookmarking for an auction site? That seems...counterproductive. Why would I want to draw attention to the auctions I'm interested in? So more people will bid and drive my cost up? No thanks, I'll keep the hard to find listings hard to find.

    4. Re:Ebay's UI & Search Stinks by comforteagle · · Score: 1

      It sounds weird until you consider how easy it is to add an entry for a seller. Think about how hard it is for a seller to get information onto ebay. Repeating that ardous process isn't an option. Here comes the genius of the boomarklet. Click... tag tag. Done.

    5. Re:Ebay's UI & Search Stinks by comforteagle · · Score: 1

      If there weren't so much noise on ebay it would be easy to demote or punish users for spamming. It can't be done currently because of the sheer volume of noise... you'd never see the link to block a user or to inflict damage on their reputation... which is a key part of dealing on ebay.

    6. Re:Ebay's UI & Search Stinks by comforteagle · · Score: 1

      "What does bother me is you sometimes have multiple categories for the same thing. For example there is a Car Audio section under Consumer Electronics and a Car Audio section under eBay Motor. People to the search in two places to find what they are looking for." This where I think tagging becomes so useful... a listing can be in both places and the person looking will likely find it, but not in such a nasty way.

    7. Re:Ebay's UI & Search Stinks by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      [...]I'm hoping fyndr can put a, yeah yeah, web2.0 face on the old web1.0 beast.

      So, how exactly are you trying to improve eBay by adding an utterly horrible interface? Seriously, Web 2.0 is synonymous with weird interfaces. (And yes, the concept of throwing a hundred words into a box and making the more popular ones bigger is utterly horrible. I don't care what other people are interested in, I want to navigate to what I'm interested in. Hiding the interesting-but-unpopular links between huge words is not helpful.)

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  27. Google, Destoryer of Dreams by Duncan3 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here in Silicon Valley, the most often spoken line is now "We would fund your company, it's brilliant, but Google would just copy it, so no."

    Google doesnt even have to do anything anymore... the fear of Google is killing the whole tech industry. They are the online version of Walmart, crushing every business within their grasp, and forcing everyone to play by their rules.

    Just ask any online business not on page 1 of a search result, if you can find one that's still in business that is.

    Anything Google even might possibly copy, isn't happening at all, just like Microsoft used to do - and did very well. Google will crush everyone just as effectively in the end.

    --
    - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    1. Re:Google, Destoryer of Dreams by sfjoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Here in Silicon Valley, the most often spoken line is now "We would fund your company, it's brilliant, but Google would just copy it, so no."

      The fact of the matter is that there are more startups being funded now than any time in the past 5 years.
      http://money.cnn.com/2006/03/03/technology/busines s2_nextpanel0303/index.htm
      Maybe your idea just sucked?

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    2. Re:Google, Destoryer of Dreams by geekoid · · Score: 1

      maybe he should start his presentation with:
      "It just like Google, but...."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Google, Destoryer of Dreams by AzureWrathHal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I find it really comforting that no matter what the subject matter is, there's always an "expert" on hand to inform you about the finer points of a slashdot post.

    4. Re:Google, Destoryer of Dreams by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      ...crushing every business within their grasp, and forcing everyone to play by their rules.

      You're forgetting an important point: generally, Google's rules kick ass.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  28. Hey! by Feminist-Mom · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some of us enjoy having things forced down our throats. :)

    1. Re:Hey! by doughrama · · Score: 2, Funny

      This coming from the "Feminist-Mom."

      I don't know if I should laugh or what... be either way I feel kinda dirty.

    2. Re:Hey! by doughrama · · Score: 1

      Wow! Relax, you read way to much into my post.

    3. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      28?

      What about this comment?
      Not that age has anything to do with libido. :) Kudos to your lack of prudishness!

    4. Re:Hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love you. write me sometime chiefsfan05 at gmail dot com

    5. Re:Hey! by Feminist-Mom · · Score: 1

      What is on your mind ?

  29. The evil will bubble up by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Microsoft and eBay are victims of their own success. They played the game and shut down every other player. They won. Now they are on top and seemingly nobody can touch them. The problem is that they are now making the rules. And to everybody else, that doesn't seem fair.

    Now Google has made their own game and a lot of people are playing it. Google is making new rules. Everybody's happy about that because they have a choice now. But the day will come when people don't want to play by eBay's, Microsoft's or Google's rules. People will once again feel trapped and left with no good optios. Then google will be evil and the newest significant startup will be the hero.

    Google is owned by the stockholders just like MS and eBay. The same greed for money will become more and more obvious to anybody who isn't love-sick.

    1. Re:The evil will bubble up by rtb61 · · Score: 1
      E-bay and paypal and not considered all that clean and any harm suffered by sellers or the customers is secondary to the profits being sought e-bay and paypal.

      Google in participating in that market would not be seeking to provide a more honest market place, it would just be seeking profit growth to increase share price but the likely result would be the exact opposite because of the nature of that markets behaviour will end up damaging the brand which in turn provides for easier competition in it's other market areas.

      Google are also again competing with it's customers (not only ebay but also all of ebay's existing competitors around the world), something google's other customers will have to look at before providing google with more funds to attack them in turn, in the future.

      Yahoo, MSN or AOL are not likely partners for E-bay either, they in reality are just future competitors and in fact all of them were less than successful competitors in the past.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:The evil will bubble up by NetRAVEN5000 · · Score: 1
      Don't be fooled. MS is NOT a victim of its success, it's a victim of its past.

      MS played the game - and they won - but they didn't play fair. I read the bio - all they ever did was screw the other guy. They took the very idea of a GUI from Jobs (another programmer blurted out their secret that the cursors were handled by software, not hardware as Gates thought), they screwed IBM by originally allying with them to make OS/2, then pulling out of the project only to use the code and the UI for Windows. They screwed Apple by failing to ship Mac versions of their software.

      In fact, Bill Gates coined the term "software piracy" when a minority of disgruntled users made copies of his Altair software. I guess some things never change - back then MS software was overpriced, now it still is.

  30. Re:I remember by wakejagr · · Score: 4, Funny

    echo hell yes > /tmp/temp_a.txt;
    echo hell no >> /tmp/temp_a.txt;
    grep -v no /tmp/temp_a.txt;

    --
    Don't save Windows XP! http://www.petitiononline.com/jjw1xp/petition.html
  31. Re:So... by bob_herrick · · Score: 1

    Don't you mean "All your bays are belong to us?"

  32. open the market by esocid · · Score: 1

    as much as I hate government regulation (except in the case of capitalism) eBay needs a little regulation since they have been screwing just about every 'customer' they have, not to mention the crap they pulled with something awful's katrina donations. just because google is trying to expand the market doesn't make them evil, it makes them the good guy. the only reason eBay is scared is because every other auction/pay service site has 1/100th of a percent of the publicity that they have but google has the ability to challenge them. i'm rooting for google on this one.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  33. What's the worst that could happen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Huh, e-bay? Afraid that you might have to actually do something about the fraud and deception that routinely happens in your auctions? Afraid that you might have to rein in Paypal and keep them from treating your customers, your only asset, like red-headed stepchildren? Afraid that you might actually have to return to the business model that you started with and provide real service again? Or are you really afraid that you will have to scale back your profits to something more reasonable with some competition? The last few things I sold on e-bay cost me nearly 11% of the auction price by the time all was said and done.

    I don't think this is anything but good!

  34. Google needs Ebay BS! by danath333 · · Score: 0

    from TFA: "Most" of eBay's annual US$400 million marketing budget goes to Google, and shareholders would surely notice the loss of that large a sum." 400mil annually is a drop in the bucket for Google.

  35. Ebay fees by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    If Ebay would cut it's fees it would have nothing to fear from Google. But ebay rather likes increasing it's fees at 2 to 4 times the rate of inflation.

  36. What about the advertising? by AusIV · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If eBay wants to fight google, they should stop being one of google's biggest advertisers. Search for any noun on google, you get an ad telling you that it can be found on Google. Example:

    A search for George Bush provides:
    George Bush
    Looking for George Bush?
    Find exactly what you want today.
    www.eBay.com

    A search for Eggs provides:
    Eggs
    All your favorite collectibles!
    Eggs and more -aff
    Ebay.com

    A search for Milk provides:
    Milk
    Save on Glass and Glassware!
    Milk and more -aff
    Ebay.com

    In fact, I dare you to find a noun you can search for on google without coming up with an eBay add. As near as I can tell, eBay is Google's single largest advertiser. If they want to hurt google, they should start by cutting off some funding.

    1. Re:What about the advertising? by Irish_Samurai · · Score: 1

      in fact, I dare you to find a noun you can search for on google without coming up with an eBay add.

      Testicles. eBay does not sell testicles. Well, they don't advertise on google that they do.

    2. Re:What about the advertising? by glam0006 · · Score: 0

      Really? What about blowup doll? No eBay link on the first page.

    3. Re:What about the advertising? by tomph · · Score: 1

      Those ads aren't necessarily paid for by eBay. Most likely, the people that purchase those ads are members of the eBay affiliate program. So eBay, though profiting off them, doesn't directly control them.

    4. Re:What about the advertising? by moochfish · · Score: 1

      Sure, at the expense of hurting themselves even more.

    5. Re:What about the advertising? by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      Perpetual Motion Machine
      Whatever you're looking for
      you can get it on eBay.
      www.eBay.com

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    6. Re:What about the advertising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's hope that Iran doesn't find this...

      Plutonium
      Great deals on Plutonium
      Shop on eBay and Save!
      www.eBay.com

    7. Re:What about the advertising? by sd790 · · Score: 1
      This is addressed in TFA:

      The auction giant gets about half of its traffic from some form of online advertising, making it very dependent on Google.

      "If eBay reduced its spending on Google, revenue at eBay would take a hit," says Jim Friedland, an analyst with Cowen & Co. "If eBay stopped spending on Google, the revenue decline would be dramatic and it would be disastrous for the stock. For better or for worse, eBay needs to continue to spend and grow its relationship with Google."

    8. Re:What about the advertising? by D+H+NG · · Score: 1

      FYI, the "aff" means that it's an affiliate who's getting a share of the money for every item sold on eBay. The eBay affiliates are the advertisers, not eBay itself.

    9. Re:What about the advertising? by tulsileaf · · Score: 1

      Sex
      Looking for sex?
      Find exactly what you want today.
      Ebay.com

      --
      - tlf
    10. Re:What about the advertising? by Chrax · · Score: 1

      Christian Death
      Looking for Christian Death?
      Find exactly what you want today.
      www.eBay.com

  37. Cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope google does this, because I think the fees for ebay + fees for paypal are too steep, especially on smaller items.

  38. The article lacks merit, and PayPal is hokey. by NRAdude · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The Uniform Commercial Code is the governing regulation for all accounts appraised by debt notes from the Federal Reserve System. What should hint everyone as "odd" is the fact that PayPal transacts a majority of its service in USD and yet the agents of PayPal have no qualifications (meaning merit and experience) in abiding by the aspects of Offer and Acceptance relevant in commerce. Agents of PayPal have one typical, worldly gut reaction to criticism and is similar to various other services offered from jail: seizure. Also, PayPal does not allow unhindered movement of funds to the account holder, and frivolously delegates authority of funds without ackowledging that PayPal is in-deed been Trusted to hold the funds on behalf of the account holder.

    In all manners of misplaced judgment by agents of PayPal, there is a distinct measure of tresspass that is difficult to redress because such service is evidence of misplaced faith and trust in a service that is neither correlated with banking under the Uniform Commercial Code. I've lost USD 300 to PayPal, from the beginning when someone created an account on my behalf and without permittion, then moving fund into that account as an antic to compel me to ship a predefined goods and services at the mercy of their payment method.

    Anyone that uses PayPal will surely know they are on borrowed time. PayPal apparrently moves the collected share of funds to no other place but Germany, and holds a pooled account with claims to Wells Fargo to generate interest. There you have it.

    I think there is an equal amount of concern to agents of Google, thereby not evincing any attraction to reserve the same controlls of any currency or trust regulation in its service as conferred from the claimants and onto Google. Google, for the life of its service and employs, is an ADVERTISING AGENCY. Google has no value, and is more evidence to create its measurements of currency to debase the currency trusted to it -- no different than PayPal. Every one of them, just as PayPal, are evidencing their intentional ignorance to move societies into their pretended form of commerce, ignoring the splendor and pragma of true government of the people; a service oriented by popularity of ignorance, than the lectors of intellect.

    As far as I can determine, any property within the grasp of PayPal will be hidden as PayPal Dollars -- no different than the speculations of Google to have its Google Coins. All I can say is the criminals in that Federal Reserve, Inc, have stopped the publishing of the M3 Money Supply and Gold and Silver is rising at a rate evincing the USD is about to collapse. PayPal Dollars and Google Coins are not shares to the stock of those corporations, but mismanaged currency of a collapsing economy of debt notes to no value in HJR 192.

    --
    without prejudice
  39. doesnt work for me by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1

    I tried all three of your samples and did not get the ebay ad returned

    Perhaps its targeted advertising somehow? I know I don't have any ebay cookies in my cookie jar.

    1. Re:doesnt work for me by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      I got the ads GP got, complete with identical catchphrases.

      It's funny, I was thinking "What kind of retard would buy milk over the intarweb" and one of the google ads was for my local dairy that delivers. Must've found my zip code in a cookie somewhere. A bit creepy.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    2. Re:doesnt work for me by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      Just tried some for myself: "chair", ebay was first, "windmill", ebay was second, "frog", ebay was the only one who had an advertised link here.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
    3. Re:doesnt work for me by happycat64 · · Score: 0
      Must've found my zip code in a cookie somewhere.

      They know your IP address, retard. From that, they can estimate the region you are in.

    4. Re:doesnt work for me by generic-man · · Score: 1

      They can find your location from your IP address, or if you've voluntarily given them your address (say, to customize Google Local) then they know exactly where you are.

      When Doubleclick did the same exact thing they were denounced as the devil. Good thing Google can't be evil. :)

      --
      For more information, click here.
    5. Re:doesnt work for me by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Not all queries return ebay ads, but here are a few that do:



      --
      Plutonium
      Great deals on Plutonium Shop on eBay and Save! www.eBay.com
      --
      "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
    6. Re:doesnt work for me by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      Well, my IP address (here at work) is in another state. I wasn't logged in to google or anything, I often use a fresh machine. I'd done a bit of browsing, and I think I tracked a UPS package. I was impressed/scared that they could localize me.

      Doubleclick was an irritation. I think they were the reason I started using a homemade proxy blocker. I had written them off for their irritation factor alone.

      I don't get the attitude about google. The minute they bother me, I'll stop dealing with google. I just hope there's some alternative left when/if that happens.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    7. Re:doesnt work for me by generic-man · · Score: 1

      What exactly was so irritating about Doubleclick that Google doesn't do? At this point Google sells text ads (including for your parked domains), image ads, and Flash ads. Google doesn't seem likely to follow the trend Doubleclick did into pop-up and pop-under ads, but there's very little to stop Google Adsense subscribers from intrusively slapping Google ads all over their web sites just like they did with Doubleclick ads.

      The only difference between Doubleclick and Google is that people trust Google enough to archive their personal e-mail, search histories, and browsing histories (Web Accelerator, wi-fi hotspots) forever. That just don't sit right with me.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    8. Re:doesnt work for me by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1
      I haven't seen much in the way of google image ads, and never seen a flash one. Part of that is due to flash/adblocking possibly.

      Doubleclick just rubbed me wrong. I don't know how rational it is to not care about google very much, but at least they've never installed adware on my machine. I've never been stuck in an infinite popup hell thanks to google. I've never even been asked to do something annoying for a free ipod thanks to google.

      I think people don't care so much about google because they haven't been actively and blatantly acting against the user's interests, or with a visible lack of respect for the user.

      I think they'll turn evil eventually, and boy will that be a fine mess.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    9. Re:doesnt work for me by generic-man · · Score: 1

      If you want Google to promote free iPod offers to you, you just have to ask :)

      I agree about the no-adware thing: Google seems to be on the most paranoid geek's whitelist, except for Google Web Accelerator and possibly Google's Desktop Search with multiple-computer searching option (yay for business data being sent over the 'net).

      --
      For more information, click here.
  40. Re:I remember by ZSO · · Score: 1

    Google? What are you talking about? He should have seen Microsoft as the enemy, you dolt.

    --
    "God deliver us from our friends, we can handle the enemy." -Patton
  41. About time by Jason1729 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Paypal has been an extremely customer hostile company for many years. The only reason a lot of people use them is there's no viable alternative. If Google come up with something good, nothing can save paypal from its own history.

  42. Everything Google does is free . . . by mmell · · Score: 1
    to you.

    Trust me, they're making money somewhere.

  43. Simple Solution by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Don't use eBay. eBay has been a festering pile of shit for many years. I have little sympathy for people who are just realizing this. Believe it or not, I live a full and rewarding life, and I don't buy or sell anything on eBay at all!

    1. Re:Simple Solution by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      This is a stupid solution. The reality is that there's a lot of stuff you can't easily find any other place. For instance, I'm looking right now for a 30s-50s analog AC voltmeter for an electronics project I'm working on. This is just a small project, so I'm not willing to spend a lot of money from some fancy web store based out of Nebraska which has these things for $75 each (ouch!), but there's lots of them on Ebay for $5 or $10, which I consider a reasonable price for an obscure antique which most people wouldn't care about.

      People selling used car parts have found a big market on Ebay too; instead of just hoping people will show up at your junkyard in Bumf*ck, Kansas, you can now post parts on Ebay and sell to people all over the country.

      Maybe you can live a full and rewarding life by only buying brand-new stuff at your local Best Buy, but some of us don't want only things that are found at local big-box stores. I've also managed to survive using ebay since 1996, with no negative feedbacks. But there are certainly a lot of problems with Ebay, especially Paypal and its stupid fees.

  44. Re:I remember by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    was George Orwell right about 1984?

    He was right, he's just about 30 years off. Wait 8 years to see why 2014 *will* be like '1984'.

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  45. Oh, you kids and your bookmarks! by mmell · · Score: 1

    Why, I remember having to memorize the IP addresses of sites which I wanted to go back to - and they had to be entered in binary! Seriously, you kids and your name services and your bookmarks and your heliotropes and your aeroplanes . . . all this technology is getting to be too much.

    1. Re:Oh, you kids and your bookmarks! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Entering in binary! We had to modulate the current on the cable by hand and we liked it that way!

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    2. Re:Oh, you kids and your bookmarks! by slofstra · · Score: 1

      Luxury!

  46. Ebay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i must say i would not be sad to see the end of all this Ebay marketing crap and it's about time they sorted out there dedicated bunch of spammers as well the Linux boxes dont get bothered but the works windBloZe box get crippled with Ebay crap and i dont even have an Ebay account and aint never gunna get one either ...

    Pete .

  47. It's from FOX News!? by SB_SamuraiSam · · Score: 1

    Quote a different source, please. FOX News takes it in the butt.

  48. One easy way to fix Paypal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hay you want to fix paypal and save yourself from Google.
    Make it so I can pay for porn with paypal again.

    Zbeast

  49. The reason Ebay is so successful.... by idfubar · · Score: 1, Interesting

    is that when you win an auction is practically a binding contract; you can't just flippantly decide that you don't want the thing anymore or that you found a better price somewhere else.

    Just try selling a handful of things on Craigslist and see for yourself whether people are flaky when there's no obligation to carry through on commitments. Unless Google can offer something that's binding I don't see it attracting EBay's seller community.

    --

    Rishi Chopra
    www.rishichopra.org
    1. Re:The reason Ebay is so successful.... by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 0
      is that when you win an auction is practically a binding contract; you can't just flippantly decide that you don't want the thing anymore or that you found a better price somewhere else.

      Oh really? Guess you haven't tried actually selling stuff on eBay then.
      Zero feedback bidders couldn't care less about feedback or unpaid item strikes. And if they receive any they'll just create a new account.

    2. Re:The reason Ebay is so successful.... by idfubar · · Score: 0

      What you're talking about is a boundary condition of the system. The greater majority of EBay users are *not* new/"zero feedback" bidders and actually do care about their "community" reputation. While I certainly don't dispute your assertion "zero feedback bidders" I also don't think it's representative (overall) of what selling on EBay is like, especially considering the ~50 auctions I've conducted in the last 2 years and the number of zero feedback winners (one? two?)

      --

      Rishi Chopra
      www.rishichopra.org
    3. Re:The reason Ebay is so successful.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where i'm from we just say "uncommon"

      boundary condition...lmao

  50. dog by Vellmont · · Score: 1

    I don't think you can sell animals on ebay, so that's probbably why they don't have a google clickthrough. Of course they sell all the dog "accessories" though, but still no clickthrough for dog bed.

    --
    AccountKiller
  51. Just make it free by mikerozh · · Score: 1

    Just make it free or cheap enough and they won't have any problems. There will be no reason to choose google pay system if paypal will be cheap/free. Paypal works fine.

  52. Its been a long time coming by Super+Dave+Osbourne · · Score: 1

    I have been a seller on FleeBay since Feb 2000, and around 2004 I finally gave up since Meg and company kept screwing us sellers around, and around, fees, changes in policy, in online payment options, in fees, in forms, in fees :) (get the point)... And with little to no seller support. If Google bends Meg and Co. over the preverbial table I'm all for it. Google can be the next evil empire for as far as I care. In the end someone takes the battan from the powers that be, it is time for a change of pain flavor, Google's my choice for the pain adminstrator.

  53. Will anyone actually be sad if Google won the war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would anyone be sad if Google won? Every time I go to ebay to search for something it's all the same - pirate game boy games from asia made to look genuine (and undercutting genuine items), pirate dvd's made to look semi-genuine, scams involving charging $2 for an item with $extortionate for postage (which is against eBay's TOS, yet still goes on all of the time...) It seems that they really don't give a shit what goes on unless a big corporation gets in touch and asks them to pull a legitimate auction.

    As long as google will take some responsibility and remove blatant scams they have my wholehearted support - and the support of the genuine traders which eBay depends upon.

  54. I vote for Google over Ebaypal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though, eventually the currency system should be put back in the hands of the government.

    Paying a 2-5% "TAX" to private companies like Paypal, or Google or VISA could be dangerous.
    In the short term, it is better to have multiple competitive alternatives.
    But in the long run, electronic currency is a natural monopoly and should be controlled by the government for obvious reasons.

  55. Better yet.. by tokengeekgrrl · · Score: 1

    ...if Google controls the online payment process, the seller's feedback would be irrelevant as Google's payment system would automatically know if they had been paid in full or not.

    The only manual feedback would come from buyer's verifying whether the product they bought was as advertised and satisfactory.

    - tokengeekgrrl

  56. Re:I remember by happyemoticon · · Score: 2

    Why, oh why can't the future be like Brave New World instead? Seriously, I find nothing at all wrong with happy drugs, mindless orgies on a weekly basis and 50-60 years of youth.

  57. That should be a possible exit strategy . . . by moultano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    not a liability. Google in the past has been willing to buy companies with a quality product. Bill this to investors as how they can get their money back in a few years.

    When they say, "Google would copy it," you say, "as soon as there's the slightest rumor of that, we offer to sell to them. If the product area stays below google's radar, we make money. If it doesn't, then we make our product good enough that they'd be better off buying us." An acquisition is generally a much more likely exit strategy than an IPO anyways.

    Furthermore, every good idea doesn't have to be a new company. If you want to make something, and you think google is in a better position to do it, go pitch it to google and get hired. There is as much opportunity for entrepreneurial skill within companies as there is in starting new ones.

  58. Destroy Google? Hmmm by VGfort · · Score: 1

    Doesnt it seem like everytime some new company comes around and gets good in 1 area, others are afraid of it, collaborate to take it down and while doing so Microsoft sneaks up out of no where and takes over. Either that or Microsoft was part of the collaboration to help another company and then backstabs them and then takes over

  59. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent +2 Funny -- Come on, that's a good pun.

  60. Sink or swim, bitch. by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

    "eBay is looking for partners to defend against the growing threat of Google."

    They could perhaps try being creative for once. I haven't seen any new ideas from eBay beyond "Yeah, we can buy PayPal!" I'm personally sick of having to sift through offers of "information CDs" and "ZOMG just like the real thing only not!" to get to what I want, to the point where I think eBay could seriously use a personal blacklist feature for blocking search results from certain sellers.

    If nothing else, they need to encourage sellers to use the Dutch Auction feature more instead of cluttering the system with 27 identical simultaneous auctions.

  61. One word: snipers by Jetson · · Score: 1
    f. Run real auctions. In the real world, the bidding is allowed to continue until the bids are far enough apart to make it obvious there will be no more of them. You don't have a problem with "snipers" tossing out a new bid just as the gavel falls at a real auction. Allowing snipers to control the auctions has a negative financial impact on sellers and discourages buyers.

    g. Get reasonable about locations. I live less than 10 miles from the Canada/USA border and have a postal address in both countries. Unfortunately my bank is in Canada, so eBay often won't allow me to bid on USA auctions even though I'm able to pay in USD and accept domestic shipping.

  62. Ebay + Paypal NEED competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Paypal treats its customers like SHIT. Ebay has started to crack down on even legit sellers now.. asking for receipts, supplier info etc etc, otherwise you dont get the account back. THEY FUCKING NEED COMPETITION. They are the only ones doing what they do so people dont have a choice. Ebay=evil Paypal=more evil

  63. Paypal alternative would be great by Killshot · · Score: 1

    There are many alternatives to paypal, but none are widely used enough to be useful. I really hope that a google payment system will provide a decent alternative.

  64. Let's See If I Understand this Correctly... by DaveJ45 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    eBay currently gets a huge percentage of it's traffic through paid advertising with Google.

    Now, because Google might infringe upon it's payment system and dabble a bit in online auctions, eBay will move it's advertising focus to someone like Yahoo or MSN that wouldn't send them anywhere near the referrals they get from Google?

    Anyone else besides me see that concept being a bit like tossing the baby out with the bathwater?

    Don't get me wrong, I'm quite willing to admit that I am hopelessly eBay addicted. I can also say that the chances of Google coming up with an auction site that would lure me away from eBay are somewhere between slim and none.

    As for PayPal, while I have personally never had any problems, there are enough horror stories around to make any rational person realize that they COULD happen to anyone. Who remembers, BTW, that eBay bought PayPal because, quite frankly, PayPal was kicking eBay's original online payment system's butt, to put it mildly. If Google can do a better job with their online payment system, then by all means, let the consumer benefit, and let the chips fall where they may.

    Like others have mentioned, eBay's (and PayPal's) achilles heel is their abominable customer service, on those occasions when a user needs some assistance. Their current policy is patterned, no doubt, like the model of some Hollywood version of the evil mega-insurance company. Just slam the door in the complaintant's face, and give them the double & triple dodge & shuffle untill they just give up in disgust and go away.

    Although I have been personally extremely fortunate to have not needed assistance from eBay or PayPal on more than a few occasions, I can attest to the fact that getting anything accomplished is more than frustrating, it's damn near impossible. (HINT: BE PERSISTANT, REFUSE to go away, and seach the net for a way to contact a real, honest-to-goodness, live, human-type Supervisor. They can and will help you, *IF* you can just figure out how in the world to contact one in the first place.)

    Here's a novel suggestion to eBay:

    Instead of shifting your advertising budget to a venue that will give you LESS business instead of more, divert some ad dollars into some semblance of REAL Customer Service instead. Beat your opposition in the good old fashioned capitalist way. Build a better mousetrap, etc., etc.

    Of course, you could also just opt for the new capitalism model, buy out your competition instead of going head to head against them in a free marketplace. Simply buyout Google like you did PayPal, and then you'd be the big, bad Internet bully everyone likes to think Google will someday become, instead.

    DaveJ45

    --
    Differences between how you act when some one is watching, and how you act when no one is watching, define who you are
    1. Re:Let's See If I Understand this Correctly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Beat your opposition in the good old fashioned capitalist way.

      Wait, what? The old fashioned way? You mean child labor? Sweat shops? Deceptive marketing, lethal working conditions and deadly products? Having union leaders killed? The "old fashioned capitalist way" is just as predatory and destructive as modern methods. Take off those rosy glasses: the history of capitalism is the history of robber barons, wanton exploitation and lies.

  65. heh by hatori · · Score: 1

    Competition is good for the market. eBay (and friends) needs to cowboy up and start innovating, or drawing support the old fashioned way.

  66. Vast.com new player in the game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very promissing http://www.vast.com/ with unique model od clasifieds redistribution...

  67. Beat them at their own game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    eBay can easily counter Google by beating them at their own game.
    Find out what Google does, and do it better!

    Ok! Let's get started.

    Goggle Corporate Principle #1: Do no Evil.

    Ummmm.... We all know how eBay and PayPal treat their customers like crap.
    Yeah... Forget it eBay. Compared to the likes of you, MSFT and Yahoo! Google still has such goodwill (even with their China thing) that you can't compete. If Google decide to get into online auctions, eBay will die. That simple. And no one will shed a tear.

    BTW is gauction.com taken?

  68. goodness me by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    maybe ebay needs to stop increasing their listings fees for one.. stop requiring your powersellers to switch to bogus pieces of software after using a different piece of software for over 4 years for two.. and to start actually making my business money for three.. none of things will be stopped.. ahh well

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  69. Ebay should lay in the bed they created.. by crossmr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ebay was good..for about the first year after it arrived. Its just a life support system for sketchy wholesalers and prima-donna powersellers.

    The following is an exchange I had with ebay:
    Background: We all know power-sellers jack their shipping to cover the cost of them offering stuff at 1 penny. However if you read Ebays ToS this violates it.

    I found a seller selling a USB dongle, domestic shipping via USPS (standard air mail, no insurance, etc). After an exchange with ebay, I was told that "Ebay trusts their sellers to set appropriate ship amounts".

    Reading their ToS further you discover that its also a violation to list the handling price as a percentage of the final fee. I found several listings by an individual doing just that. I was given the same form letter.

    Ebay is junk. They do nothing but protect their power-sellers. Many power-sellers hold feedback hostage. When you feedback like:
    Joeblow - item recieved broken, did not respond to e-mails, attempted to call, would not speak with me, etc

    Powerseller1111 - BAD EBAYER STAY AWAY!!!

    you know exactly what happened. If ebay actually cared about the integrity of its system it would institute a double blind feedback system where each user inputs their feedback then its applied when both have inputed and saved it.

    It was another nice idea that got ruined by the internet.