Slashdot Mirror


Dvorak Admits To Trolling Mac Users

jalefkowit writes "Tech pundit John Dvorak has long been known for his inflammatory opinions. Many have suspected that these opinions are just a way to drive up traffic to his column. Now, we have it straight from the horse's mouth: Dave Winer has Dvorak on video describing his methodology for trolling the Mac community to pump up his stats." I have to admit I'm also guilty of posting the occasional inflammatory story, but I find it's usually best to suffix the title with a question mark, and let our ever-knowledgeable readers hash out the issue and decide for themselves.

354 comments

  1. Trolling the Mac community? by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Thats an almost impossible task - mac users are too smart to take the bait ;)

    --
    There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    1. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this guy is right, we are way too smart i don't see how he could do it

    2. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by mkw87 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just like they are too smart to operate the elevator at the NYC Store?

      --
      Arguing with an engineer is like wrestling a pig in mud. Soon, you realize the pig is dirty, and he likes it.
    3. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Mac sites are up in arms, with commentors demanding that PC Magazine pull their columnist because he has no integrity. I don't know why anybody ever takes Dvorak seriously. If you don't, you'll see that he can actually be pretty entertaining.

      Too bad Apple does not include a sense of humor with iLife. Even now when Dvorak's let us all in on the joke, they still don't get it.

    4. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by BobPaul · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey! That's not fair! That elevator is really super confusing. It has all of these buttons you have to push... It's hard.

    5. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Hey! That's not fair! That elevator is really super confusing. It has all of these buttons you have to push... It's hard.

      An elevator with the Mac UI would have just one button "THERE". I mean, after all, I'm already HERE.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An elevator with the Mac UI would have a picture of the building, and you'd have to drag and drop the elevator to the floor you wanted to go to. With flashy animations and stuff.

      Never mind that just pushing a button is quicker, easier, and more efficient...

    7. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by zoomshorts · · Score: 0

      I think NOT. The Apple community are the FIRST to have knee-jerk responses,
      despite their being around 4 percent of the PC users on the planet.

      Oh well.

    8. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by MustardMan · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Grandparent - funny and insightful comment about the sometimes over-simplification of mac UI's

      Parent - stupid troll who doesn't realize that there are about ten different ways to do most tasks in OS X, with more uniform keyboard shortcuts and extensive contextual menus than windows has.

    9. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by mattkinabrewmindspri · · Score: 2

      An elevator with the Mac UI would have a picture of the building, and you'd drag the elevator over the floor you wanted to go to, at which point the picture would change to be a picture of that floor, and then you'd drop the elevator on the specific room you wanted to go to, and it would take you to that room.

    10. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
      Meanwhile, though, thanks to the underlying UNIXy OS, powerusers who type faster than they mouse can just open a terminal window and type (with tab-completion)
      open /Floors/14/Offices/Mike\'s\ Office
      to get right there.
    11. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by stunt_penguin · · Score: 5, Funny

      An elevator with a Google interface would be similarly easy to use, if slightly more text heavy, and there'd be some buttons off to the right hand side advertising what's on other floors based on the floors you've already visited, what you were talking about when you came into the elevator and what you're carrying.


      Reportedly, Ballmer now prefers to take the stairs

      --
      When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
    12. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey! That's not fair! That elevator is really super confusing. It has all of these buttons you have to push... It's hard.

      And they go, like, beep-beep-beep-beep... and the doors open up and the floor you were on is, like, gone!
      --Ellen Feiss

    13. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by asuffield · · Score: 1

      mac users are too smart to take the bait

      Are those the same mac users who have in the past done themselves injuries by trying to cram a graphite powermac into their mouth and suck on it, believing it to be a throat lozenge?

    14. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by swiftstream · · Score: 1

      Actually, for a two-floor structure like the Apple Store, that would work quite nicely. I'm not sure "there" would be the best label for the button, though.

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    15. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by wavedeform · · Score: 1
      An elevator with the Mac UI would have just one button "THERE". I mean, after all, I'm already HERE.


      Actually, for an elevator with only two destinations, this would be a pretty cool UI, IMO.

    16. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by svanstrom · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Not as cool as if it'd be one huge button which just says "don't panic"... ;)

      --
      perl -e'print$_{$_} for sort%_=`lynx -dump svanstrom.com/t`'
    17. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by macphile84 · · Score: 0

      AKA a click-through ad space. Brilliant.

    18. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by kv9 · · Score: 5, Funny
      > Reportedly, Ballmer now prefers to take the chairs

      there, i fixed that for you

    19. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by colinbrash · · Score: 2, Funny

      An elevator with the Mac UI would have just one button "THERE". I mean, after all, I'm already HERE.

      And the button would be in the middle of a big touch-sensitive circle that makes the elevator go up and down at varying speeds.

      Actually, that might be kind of cool...

    20. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by kimvette · · Score: 2, Funny

      But -- but -- but I thought the "mighty elevator" was the latest innovation! Mac users got confused by more than one button? Tell me it ain't so! I'm shocked! ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    21. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      But, how would the elevator know to open the door when you get there? Do you drag the elevator and drop it on a dumpster outside the building? Or, do you hop on one leg while pressing the elevator button labeled "E"? ;)

      Hey wait a minute! I thought we were supposed to be razzing that hack Dvorak here, not Mac users??

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    22. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by kimvette · · Score: 1

      I was drinking water when I came across your post. You owe me a new monitor and keyboard! :-D

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    23. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Actually, for a two-floor structure like the Apple Store, that would work quite nicely. I'm not sure "there" would be the best label for the button, though.

      Why the hell would you need any buttons on a two-floor structure? That's as useless as a modal dialog box with only an OK button. If someone is in the elevator, it's because they want to go to the other floor.

      I'll grant that a button does serve one useful purpose -- people like to push buttons. But an elevator should be designed to move people from floor to floor, not help treat their psychological problems.

    24. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Dot+Solipsism · · Score: 1

      In fact, the elevator uses Windows Vista. You have to confirm your desire to exit the elevator 7x before it finally lets you out.

      [7 steps to deleting shortcut in Vista]

    25. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by darvs · · Score: 1

      I've heard Ballmer does not let his kids use elevators either.

    26. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      so you either need buttons or a reliable occupation detection system

      and also if pranksters left something in your lift (assuming the list is publically accessible) would you wan't it wasting power moving up and down constantly.

      and you'd also wan't buttons for panic alarm, close doors now (i HATE lifts that lack this or respond slowly to it) etc.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    27. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Funny

      Um, the button might be helpful for telling the elevator there is someone inside wanting to go to the other floor. Just throwing out ideas here.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    28. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1
      and you'd also wan't buttons for panic alarm, close doors now (i HATE lifts that lack this or respond slowly to it) etc.
      On the majority of lifts, the "close door" buttons exist only to give the occupants something to do while waiting for the doors to close. The publically accessible thermostat is more likely to affect the temperature in your office building.
    29. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That kind of "fuzzy logic" would rock, dude!

    30. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Um, there are many ways that are helpful for telling that someone is inside an elevator that don't involve buttons. And if someone is inside an elevator, then they want to go to the other floor. Just throwing our ideas here.

    31. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      well the recently fitted ones here in the sackville street building at manchester university its somewhat noticeable, if the button is held it will start to close before its finished announcing "LiFt GoInG uP" in the most irritating female voice possible. If you don't press it it waits until that announcement is finished.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    32. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by crashelite · · Score: 2, Funny

      it would also have a im feeling lucky button... just make sure ur safe lift filter is on unless u want to go to those floors....

      --
      (yes i know i suck at spelling fell free to correct my grammar and/or spellin i dont care, im still not going to change
    33. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      "An elevator with the Mac UI would have a picture of the building, and you'd drag the elevator over the floor you wanted to go to, at which point the picture would change to be a picture of that floor, and then you'd drop the elevator on the specific room you wanted to go to, and it would take you to that room."

      And if you want to exit the elevator, you intuitively drag the picture of the elevator to the trash can!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    34. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Ascay · · Score: 1

      > Reportedly, Ballmer now prefers to take the stairs

      And I thought he prefers to take chairs.

    35. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Admiral+Ag · · Score: 1

      Nah.

      The Apple iElevator (sorry, MacElevator Pro) would have a touch screen display that displayed the available floors (and not the one you were on) along with the relevant information of who was on each floor. It wouldn't beep, but would have a chord played by the Berlin Philharmonic as the alert sound. And it would have the awesome feature that Korean elevators have and Canadian ones don't: I mean that if you push the button twice it cancels the action (so you aren't doomed to visit your mistakes).

      And it would be round.

      --
      "by that I mean people who don't sit on slashdot all day wondering why everyone else isn't building robots" DECS
    36. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by swiftstream · · Score: 1

      Well, having a button to push ("Go" or something) could help people signify when they were ready to go, e.g. if there were several people getting on the elevator. I personally don't think I would like an elevator with no buttons at all--but maybe those are just my psychological problems showing through.

      I think the same thing applies to modal dialog boxes, personally. I want a button that I can push when I'm done reading it. I don't want the computer to try and decide when I'm done and close the dialog box before I'm ready. Maybe I wasn't reading for the first half of the time the computer calculated it would take me to read the dialog box, because I was distracted. Honestly, would you rather have dialog boxes disappear by themselves, or something?

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    37. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by NMerriam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, there are many ways, and the button is least expensive and most reliable. Plus, it makes the user feel in control.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    38. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by azav · · Score: 1

      "The Other Floor"

      ??

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    39. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by mattkime · · Score: 1

      >>It has all of these buttons you have to push... It's hard.

      Push? I thought you licked them...

      --
      Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
    40. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or the quicker version
      open /Fl[tab]/14/Off[tab]/Mike[tab]
    41. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by fbg111 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you don't, you'll see that he can actually be pretty entertaining.

      Or you'll realize that time and life are precious, and reading Dvorak is a complete waste of both.

      --
      Flying is easy, just throw yourself at the ground and miss. -Douglas Adams
    42. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by pjay_dml · · Score: 1

      "close doors now (i HATE lifts that lack this or respond slowly to it)"
      Yeah, especially when that "loved" cow-orker starts dashisng for the lift you are standing in ....

    43. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      You'd think they'd have figured out he's not to be taken seriously when he proposed a decade ago that Microsoft be nationalized for national security.

    44. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      We've got an elevator with only two floors like that around here. I've been saying for years that they should just have a big green button labeled "GO!".

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    45. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Baddas · · Score: 1

      His point is that the dialog box should always have a choice. You should always be able to decide "wait, that's not good" and cancel, or the like.

    46. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Nationalize Microsoft, shut it down, and replace Windows with OpenBSD. Wouldn't that contribute to natinal security? Or wasn't that the plan?

    47. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by YU+Nicks+NE+Way · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but single clicking it would just turn on the highlight. You have to double click it to actually activate the elevator.

      When you do that, the elevator delivers you wherever it infers you should og. To get the complete control, you hold down the control key while clicking the button, then navigate the contextual menu with your nose.

    48. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1
      Yes, there are many ways, and the button is least expensive and most reliable.
      I'll grant that a button may be a few dollars less expensive than many other equally reliable ways to detect when people are on elevator. But if you think saving $5 is important, you'll shocked to realize the real cost savings you can achieve by ripping out the elevator and installing stairs.
    49. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by cfuse · · Score: 1
      The Mac sites are up in arms, with commentors demanding that PC Magazine pull their columnist because he has no integrity.

      Why exactly would a magazine targetted at PC users give a flying fuck what mac sites think? They aren't the target market.

    50. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Katanasensei · · Score: 1

      Reportedly, Ballmer now prefers to take the stairs
      I have seen elevators with chairs in it...

    51. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Skroggtar · · Score: 1

      Hey, lay off. Anyone could've made that mistake.

    52. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by CountBrass · · Score: 1
      No buttons? How would lift know that everyone is in and ready to go?

      The only effective no-button lifts I am aware of are Paternosters.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    53. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by swissfondue · · Score: 1

      "you'd also wan't buttons for panic alarm, close doors now (i HATE lifts that lack this or respond slowly to it) etc."
      um...that would be "force quit".

      --
      Rubies and Pearls are not what you think.
    54. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if you want to exit the elevator, you intuitively drag the picture of the elevator to the trash can!

      Or just hit command-Q. You can also use command-W, but this causes the elevator car to wait around holding a triangle until you come back, clogging up traffic.

    55. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by celotil · · Score: 1

      An elevator with the Mac UI would have just one button "THERE". I mean, after all, I'm already HERE.

      Actually, that's not a bad idea for places where there are only two floors.

      You have a There button, Open Doors (for when you have that person running towards the elevator shouting "hold the lift!", and Close Doors (for when you don't like that persistantly late arse-hole), plus the Alarm and Stop buttons.

      I wonder if any elevators have been built like that.

      --
      Te Quiero, Puta!
    56. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by cafard · · Score: 2, Funny

      An elevator with the Mac UI would have just one button "THERE". "THERE" being randomly determined on the Elevator Shuffle, the only affordable one for trendy but short in cash companies.

      --
      This post is awesome.
    57. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by rhkramer · · Score: 1

      Except maybe the elevator cleaning person?

    58. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      That would eject the elevator.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    59. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by menace3society · · Score: 1

      ... plus a button that randomly takes you to whatever floor Google thinks is best.

    60. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about one button labelled "Where do you want to go today?".

    61. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 2, Funny
      that would be "force quit".
      Since we're talking about the Apple store, I assume they'll have an emergency paperclip behind the counter.
    62. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      You could still have the call button on the outside, so that the elevator wouldn't be running constantly. There's just no point to having a floor button on the inside.

      --
      Why not fork?
    63. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1

      Do you suppose the button delays the start of the announcement, or increases its duration?

      You should do tests.

    64. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you'll shocked to realize the real cost savings you can achieve by ripping out the elevator and installing stairs.

      ADA lawsuits are mighty expensive.

    65. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by swiftstream · · Score: 1

      If that's his point, how does it apply to the elevator? Is he saying the elevator should have a "wait, that's not right, I don't want to go anywhere" button? :-|

      I'm not sure I buy that...

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    66. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by Karma+Farmer · · Score: 1
      Is he saying the elevator should have a "wait, that's not right, I don't want to go anywhere" button?
      Yes, just like an escalator, all elevators should probably have a big red emergency "OMFG STOP!" button. Two floor elevators just don't need a "go" button".
    67. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by EricTheO · · Score: 0, Redundant

      > "Hey! That's not fair! That elevator is really super confusing. It has all of these buttons you have to push... It's hard." That's why for years Mac user have only had a one button Mouse. They can't figure out what to do with a more efficient 5 button/scroll wheel mouse. ;-p

      --
      -Eric
    68. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by DRM_is_Stupid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm, that's rather interesting. The Ginza Apple Store elevator has zero buttons to push. It just continuously stops at every floor in a loop.
      I just assumed it would be the same for other stores as well..

    69. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by tigersha · · Score: 1

      It would also be able to tell you exactly in which aisle on the floor you get the stuff you want, what it costs, and suggest alternatives in other the stores on the planet.

      An option to view a picture would be there too.

      --
      The dangers of excessive individualism are nothing compared to the oppressiveness of excessive collectivism
    70. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by real+gumby · · Score: 1
      Or you'll realize that time and life are precious, and reading Dvorak is a complete waste of both.
      Actually, I've read both Time and life and hate to break it to you: they are a complete waste.
    71. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by swiftstream · · Score: 1

      Wait, so now you're saying the elevator should have only one button (which the OP was complaining about), but it shouldn't be a "go" button?

      I have to disagree again, I'm afraid. An emergency button is great, but I still think a "go" button should be there. Me telling an elevator when I'm ready to go is one of my psychological diseases, maybe. From too many years lugging suitcases into and out of hotel elevators, maybe.

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
    72. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by jackbird · · Score: 1

      Somebody actually tried to address this 'problem'. There's an installation in the Marriott Marquis in Times Square. Guess which hotel now has to have a staff member on hand at all times to explain the elevator?

    73. Re:Trolling the Mac community? by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      No, that's a different problem. My pretend complaint was that elevators were too difficult for Mac Users who are used to simple interfaces. What you're talking about is just a more efficient elevator, and it's been on slashdot 2 or 3 times when it was in various testing stages on a building in Seatle I think.

  2. Torrent download by nacturation · · Score: 2, Informative

    Direct link: http://s3.amazonaws.com/scripting/dvorak.mov?torre nt

    Of course, Dvorak will just say that it's not true -- he was just trolling on that recording, thus completing the prophecy and dooming mankind.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Torrent download by azav · · Score: 1

      Here's a smaller file at identical quality (1/3 the size, 6 vs 20 MB)

      Could someone please torrent this?

      http://69.3.167.6/~zav/Dvorak-3ivx-streaming.mov

      Cheers. Please don't melt my server.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  3. I've said it before by thefirelane · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dvorak is nothing other than the worlds most successful troll. As much as everyone here complains about him, we eat it up and come back for more. We used to be able to pretend it was the editors foisting him upon us... but lo' and behold, democratic Digg comes along, and he still makes the front page!

    1. Re:I've said it before by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dvorak is nothing other than the worlds most successful troll.

      I think you meant:

      Dvorak is nothing other than the worlds most successful internet troll.

      (see Stern, Rush, etc etc)

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    2. Re:I've said it before by generic-man · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Two words: Ann Coulter.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:I've said it before by DingerX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, he's been doing this for a long time. And the tech world is full of enough fanatics that you can't help but piss people off. Write an inflammatory article on Apple, Open Source, Linux, Nintendo, or any number of other technosacredcows, and bang! instant traffic. Much easier than saying something intelligent.

    4. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Two words for Ann Coulter: "Itsa Dude"

      S(H)e has man hands and an adams apple. Nothing like politics from a repressed christian transexual.

    5. Re:I've said it before by dbzero · · Score: 1

      I used to love flipping PCMag's pages to Dvorak's work. But that's before I knew better. Which was about ten years ago when I let my subscription finally run out.

    6. Re:I've said it before by telbij · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We used to be able to pretend it was the editors foisting him upon us... but lo' and behold, democratic Digg comes along, and he still makes the front page!

      No, this is backwards. The unwashed masses will never be collectively smart enough to distinguish a troll, statistical certainty and all that. This is the purpose of editorial control, to go beyond the bell curve. Dvorak can be kept off /. All that we need is to convince the few editors that he is, in fact, a full-time troll, And that his rantings do not deserve a place on the front page because they are neither news, nor are they 'stuff that matters'. Unfortunately I think a successful troll is just as good for /. as it is for Dvorak's employers, so there's little incentive for them to change. We can always dream though.

    7. Re:I've said it before by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      If /. had a dvorak filter I would use it.

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    8. Re:I've said it before by P3NIS_CLEAVER · · Score: 1

      She trolls people about things they have a right to be pissed about...

      Dvorak taps into people that get up in arms over their technology choices; pretty pathetic, don't you think??

      --
      Please sign petition to restore sanity to our banking system!!!

      http://financialpetition.org/
    9. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, WMF, you're not that far behind.

    10. Re:I've said it before by sphealey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dvorak writes a lot of different stuff, including some real journalism and technology analysis. But his best known work, and that which I am sure earns him his bread-and-butter, is technology gossip. Like every gossip column ever written since the first traveling minstrel appeared on the scene 30,000 years ago, Dvoark's gossip columns consist of a mixture of truth, exaggeration, spin (whether planted by the technology companies or generated by Dvorak himself), trolling, and some totally made-up stuff.

      For example, Dvorak has been trying to force the monitor companies to bring new technologies to market for at least the last 20 years. That is why he hypes-Hypes-HYPES any rumour of a new display technoloy (seen that 300 dpi Texas Instruments display he reported "almost ready for production" in 1995 yet?). 40% truth, 40% exaggeration, 20% Dvorak-generated spin.

      But as I said, that is how gossip columns of any kind work. Don't like it, don't read it.

      sPh

    11. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Dvorak is nothing other than the worlds most successful troll.

      Just because it is a troll does not mean that it isn't true. When Apple hands you an iBook that looks like a makeup case ... many other tech writers would still write enough "quoteable nice things" to ensure more goodies in the future.

      --
      I'm not an AC for USA topics.
      I'm not an AC for NSA topics.
      Be very afraid on Mac topics.

    12. Re:I've said it before by slyborg · · Score: 1

      Amen to that. That's how we finally got rid of the other infamous troll moron from the early days whose name shall not be spoken, but which rhymes with Gone Bats....

    13. Re:I've said it before by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      I agree. When they cut out the source for their utilties, Dvorak was the only thing really left reading. (Which isn't saying a lot.)

      The thing is, he wrote stuff that "sounded" like it could be "real" -- It was to enjoyable to speculate, on what _might_ happen, for us geeks, when the industry could of gone any number of directions.

      At least back then, it didn't sound too crazy.

      Cheers

    14. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wmf isn't a troll!!!!!111!!!

    15. Re:I've said it before by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I'm very upset that you didn't mention me, Bill Ohreally. Don't you get Fox News in whatever dingey pinko European country you live in?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    16. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two more words: Adam's apple.

    17. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Why would you want to keep him off slashdot? His articles are entertaining, and the response of the Mac users is equally entertaining.

    18. Re:I've said it before by bob_calder · · Score: 1

      Because life is short and he is a waste of meat.

      --
      Any preoccupation with ideas of what is right or wrong in conduct shows an arrested intellectual development. (Wilde)
    19. Re:I've said it before by JavaLord · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Two words: Ann Coulter.

      Yes, much like Dvorak she voices unpopular opinions, and people look to censor both of them, because god forbid someone held an opinion, or wrote a story they didn't like.

    20. Re:I've said it before by falcon5768 · · Score: 1
      To censor a opinion you have to have one. She contradicts every single thing that comes out of her mouth. It is widely known that not only do liberals hate her, but most republicans too because she routinely is used as a example of what is wrong with the right wing because she is so fascist and out of touch from even the extreme right in her ideals.


      Dvorak is just a idiot, she on the otherhand exibits the type of evil one sided view that helped the Nazi party come to power.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    21. Re:I've said it before by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      Yeah, he's been doing this for a long time. And the tech world is full of enough fanatics that you can't help but piss people off. Write an inflammatory article on Apple, Open Source, Linux, Nintendo, or any number of other technosacredcows, and bang! instant traffic. Much easier than saying something intelligent.

      The funny part is, he writes 'inflammatory' articles about every tech company. Hell he wrote one about microsoft a few weeks ago. Some mac users just get pissed off because they define their life by what OS they use.

      Any time a writer will go after a 'sacred cow' as you put it, they encounter people trying to censor them. It's really too bad.

    22. Re:I've said it before by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      to censor a opinion you have to have one.

      Uhh ok? What does that mean comrade falcon?

      She contradicts every single thing that comes out of her mouth.

      Really? Name some stuff. She's more consistant than most conservative politicians. You may not agree with her, but she does not contradict anything that I've ever heard.

      It is widely known that not only do liberals hate her, but most republicans too because she routinely is used as a example of what is wrong with the right wing

      Most republicans actually like her, as do independant conservatives. Most mature people don't have to share a point of view with someone to read what they have to say, and maybe get a laugh out of it.

      because she is so fascist and out of touch from even the extreme right in her ideals.

      lol, welcome to dreamland, population you.

      Dvorak is just a idiot,

      Yes, anyone you don't like is an idiot. That is why he's been writing for the tech industry since for the past 20-30 years, and you are posting on slashdot.

      she on the otherhand exibits the type of evil one sided view that helped the Nazi party come to power

      I think you have a poor sense of history if you think advocating the screening of muslims at American airports is the same as putting Jews into ovens.

    23. Re:I've said it before by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I think a successful troll is just as good for /. as it is for Dvorak's employers, so there's little incentive for them to change.
      Slashdot is supported by sponsorship, subscriptions and advertising. The more interesting or inciteful a story is, the more ad impressions it will generate.

      While flooding the site with trollish articles would likely be counterproductive (as people would probably leave), the odd one here and there to drive up ad impressions can't hurt.

      (Why yes, I am cynical)

    24. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Digg is not democratic. They operate as a democracy only when the folks running Digg don't decide differently. In one particular thread, they censored comments (deleting them, not just modding them down to -1 like on /.) and they regularly seem to put whatever they want on the front page regardless of how the unwashed masses feel about it, including obvious spam/advertisements.

    25. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, the IQ of a mob is the IQ of the thickest person divided by the number of people in the mob.

    26. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, but I'm going to have to agree with the parent post. I've read her editorials before and they can be pretty extreme. I have no examples I can give, so maybe I should start clipping and saving them. I also suggest you read, "They Thought They Were Free: The Germans 1933 - 1945" to get a good idea of the type of thought that was common place in Germany as the Nazis were coming into power.

    27. Re:I've said it before by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? I've read her articles in the local newspaper, and she seems to just have a lot of fun being a jackass, but little else.

      Oh noes! Teddy Kennedy had some scandal? I might CARE if I didn't care at all about what that fat fuck does!

      --
      It's been a long time.
    28. Re:I've said it before by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      The proof in the pudding is that when I'm at a coffeehouse people still stop and look at my blueberry clamshell iBook, vintage 1999. People don't give a crap about everyone else's generic black lappie. "Wow, that's so cool!" "That still works for you?" "It's so cute!" "Those Macs still rock." It has its limitations: 300MHz proc, 800 x 600 screen. However, boosting the HD space to 30GB and the RAM to its capacity 544MB means that Panther is quite happy on it, as are many Mac OS X apps. Sometimes I don't run the most 100% up to date version of a given app...I have Office for Mac:X on it instead of Office For Mac 2004. But still and all it's been good for me. It's nice to be able to go on a public WiFi network and not have to worry about getting 0wnz0r3d in spite of running a software firewall and spyware removers and anti-virus proggies etc. etc. etc.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    29. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does he appear if you say his name?

    30. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Replying to your detractors anonymously? Whiney Mac Fanboy, except for the trademark anime smiley, you're as bad as TMM.

      What's next, an AC FP campaign to unseat ScuttleMonkey?

    31. Re:I've said it before by DingerX · · Score: 1

      ... but some people have hit on a way to make money doing it.

    32. Re:I've said it before by realityfighter · · Score: 1

      You know that "I may not like what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it," goes both ways, right?

      I believe it's common decency to afford your fellow man the right to disagree, even vehemently, without being accused of censorship.

      I understand that we are all working from First Amendment rights here, but those do not include the right to be agreed with, or the right to be popular. You seem to believe that they do.

      --
      A strain of paranoid prevention can be worse than the disease, whate'er the intention.
    33. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you count the number of posts to the Dvorak columns posted on /., it appears that he is good for business. More posts mean more eyeballs, therefore better for /.. If we really want him to go away, we need to stop even clicking on articles involving Dvorak. Eventually he will go away.

    34. Re:I've said it before by Whanana · · Score: 1

      Sure people have curiosity for the controversial - it is human nature. He has built a reputation for trolling, but he does often has interesting ideas - even if they are wholly inaccurate and silly (kind of like Cringely).

      But everyone is on to him (and has been for sometime) so while we may still put him on the front page of digg and /., we'll never believe him again. How do I know? /. debates about a Dvorak story are increasingly swamped by "dvorak is a troll" comments and 6 of the last 10 Dvorak stories on Digg got buried.

    35. Re:I've said it before by Whanana · · Score: 1

      Sure they will. Discussion of Dvorak stories on slashdot is always swamped by highly moderated "Dvorak is a troll, don't listen" comments.
       
      If you don't think moderators are the unwashed masses, look at Digg: 6 of the last 10 stories by Dvorak were buried.

    36. Re:I've said it before by fastgood · · Score: 1
      Dvorak can be kept off /. All that we need is to convince the few editors

      NEVER! You are forgetting the modified slogan for the most hardcore of Slashdot users:
      "The nuts and dolts of IT"

    37. Re:I've said it before by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Didn't Coulter recently reveal that she didn't know Thomas Jefferson was a president? The woman is a moron, pure and simple. But she's reasonably good looking and says vile things. In short, she's Pat Robertson with tits.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    38. Re:I've said it before by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      "Really? Name some stuff. She's more consistant than most conservative politicians. "

      Really? Let's compare Coulter's 'Christianity fuels everything I write' (June 2006) with the statements below. Has she really never called for anything more radical and violent than racial profiling? Oh wait...

      'I think the government should be spying on all Arabs, engaging in torture as a televised spectator sport, dropping daisy cutters wantonly throughout the Middle East and sending liberals to Guantanamo.' (21 Dec 2005)

      'We should invade their countries, kill their leaders and convert them to Christianity. We weren't punctilious about locating and punishing only Hitler and his top officers. We carpet-bombed German cities; we killed civilians. That's war. And this is war.' (Predictably enough, 12 Sep 2001)

      'Perhaps we could put aside our national, ongoing, post-9/11 Muslim butt-kissing contest and get on with the business at hand: Bombing Syria back to the stone age and then permanently disarming Iran.' (15 Feb 2006)

      Unless your definition of "Christian" has no relation to the teachings of Christ, Javalord, you're just another droning conservative apologist too lazy to even read about the things you defend.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    39. Re:I've said it before by soft_guy · · Score: 1

      She's more consistant than most conservative politicians.

      Here's a news flash for you. Ann Coulter is NOT a politician. She is a commentator.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
    40. Re:I've said it before by KwKSilver · · Score: 1

      Yep. Like JavaLord above said Dv's trolled Windows users, too, e.g. here. I sort of remember some trollish article on Office couple of years bac, hmmh ... this, perhaps? Although the last sounded like legit complaints. Whatever, page-hit$ are page-hit$: ka-ching!

      --
      If you want your life to be different, live it differently.
    41. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Two words for Ann Coulter: "Itsa Dude"
      Two more words for Ann Coulter: "I Fucked Ann Coulter in the Ass, Hard." Whoops, that's eight words.
    42. Re:I've said it before by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1
      --
      Conservatism: The fear that somewhere, somehow, someone you think is your inferior is being treated as your equal.
    43. Re:I've said it before by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, ohreally too, along with moore, etc. Doesn't matter where you are on the political spectrum to be a troll.

      And, no, thank the fuckin' lord, I do not get fox here.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    44. Re:I've said it before by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Dvorak is nothing other than the worlds most successful troll
      Not really - a big chunk of the Australian IT press for many years has been reprints of US articles, and reading that I had never heard of Dvorak until there was an article about him on Slashdot. It appears that if an editor gets the right to say whether his articles get in or not they don't get in. I have no idea why he is not under editorial control in the magazine he writes for - he at least needs someone to check for stupidity like "the windows idle process is eating my CPU" article which makes Dave Barry a far more credible IT commentator.
    45. Re:I've said it before by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      comrade ... welcome to dreamland, population you

      Yay! Insults are fun!

      She's more consistant than most conservative politicians.

      "Consistant" does not mean "unequivocal". She has not doubts about what she says today, but she doesn't care if it's different than what she said yesterday.

      Most mature people don't have to share a point of view with someone to read what they have to say, and maybe get a laugh out of it.

      Most people I disagree with I can learn from and see where they're coming from. Someone that says that "There is no plausible explanation for the Democrats' behavior other than that they long to see U.S. troops shot, humiliated, and driven from the field of battle." and "These people are not only traitors, they are gutless traitors." is flipping nuts. And every educated Republican I know personally does their best to distant themselves from her. I do get a laugh out of her, she's the only person that makes Cal Thomas seem sane by comparison.

      I think you have a poor sense of history if you think advocating the screening of muslims at American airports is the same as putting Jews into ovens.

      I think you have a poor sense of what she advocates if you think the screening of muslims at American airports is the worst she's ever advocated. I mean "Coulter has stated that women are "not as bright" as men[31], "have no capacity to understand how money is earned"[32], and "shouldn't be in the military."[33]." and "I think the government should be spying on all Arabs, engaging in torture as a televised spectator sport, dropping daisy cutters wantonly throughout the Middle East and sending liberals to Guantanamo."

    46. Re:I've said it before by jZnat · · Score: 1

      Oh, but Al Franken can pwn her any day. Take for instance, Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them. He totally thrashes her in a few of the chapters.

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    47. Re:I've said it before by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      Hey soft guy,

      Take an english class, I never said she was a politician, I merely said she was more consistant than politicians. Go kill yourself now.

    48. Re:I've said it before by JavaLord · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Unless your definition of "Christian" has no relation to the teachings of Christ, Javalord, you're just another droning conservative apologist too lazy to even read about the things you defend.

      You must be on the low end of the democrat spectrum. Let me guess, you dropped out of high school? Try looking up the word hyperbole. Thanks for playing.

    49. Re:I've said it before by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      And, no, thank the fuckin' lord, I do not get fox here.

      I'm curious, if you did, who would force you to watch it? I get CNN but nobody makes me turn it on; Google News is much better.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    50. Re:I've said it before by sh00z · · Score: 1
      re: Ann Coulter:
      I do get a laugh out of her, she's the only person that makes Cal Thomas seem sane by comparison.
      You misspelled "James Carville."
    51. Re:I've said it before by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, if you did, who would force you to watch it? I get CNN but nobody makes me turn it on;

      The attitude of TV new helps shape public opinion, people's conversations, prejudices, etc.

      Yes, I wouldn't watch it (although it would still irritate me flickin'), but I would have to put up with people asking me / telling me / whatever about the utter bullshit they'd seen on it.

      (and I've watched enough fox to believe that enough on that channel is utter, utter horsecrap.)

      Google News is much better.

      Agreed.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    52. Re:I've said it before by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That's true - let me know if you find a decent news outlet on TV. I remember watching CNN report about Sandy Berger stealing papers from the National Archives and forgetting to mention that he snuck them out in his underwear. Until I heard that from another source (which I thought was comedy at first) I assumed he inadvertantly left something in his briefcase and the gov'y types were just giving him a hard time for something innocent. So you're absolutely right that the way news is told affects opinion. If I could find an unbiased source I'd be much happier. CNBC is too market-gung-ho, Fox and CNN are slanted to the extremes, and the networks are only showing news at weird times for modern life. Ah, well, back to Google News then.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    53. Re:I've said it before by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      Google news is good because its an aggragator rather than a source of news, so you can read al jazeera or fox's stance on the latest iraq sadness.

      I'm not familiar with any of the channels you mention apart from CNN (which is drifting slowly right), but for a reasonably non-biased (and I stress, only reasonably) news channel, give BBC world a try if you can get it.

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    54. Re:I've said it before by Sunburnt · · Score: 1

      "You must be on the low end of the democrat spectrum. Let me guess, you dropped out of high school?"

      This is funny, since your incomprehension illustrates my point. My point is that Coulter's hyperbole is the most aggressive promoter of a culture where political discussion becomes a contest in outrageousness and misdirection rather than a discussion of facts. It panders to the same grunting instinct that causes a garden-variety moron to spout factual inaccuracies such as "democrat" and "high-school dropout" and refer to a dictionary entry (defining an undisputed issue) as though it were an actual answer.

      --
      Tags != Comments, and -1 (Troll) != -1 (I Would Respond Angrily To This Poster So They Must Be Trolling)
    55. Re:I've said it before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thrashing someone != telling the truth about the person.

      But since you obviously are of his ilk, I don't expect you to agree with that anyway.

  4. Disgraceful by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next you will be telling me that Ann Coulter only accuses the 9/11 widows of enjoying the death of their spouses to get attention.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:Disgraceful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Heh, an aunt of mine knows coulter well, and assures me she doesn't believe most of what she says. In her own words, she has no qualms about telling the book buying public what they hope to hear from her, both liberals, conservatives and anyone else. It's just good business.

      Others might call it trolling but if you call it "catering to your market" it's a great way to make moniey.

    2. Re:Disgraceful by Zeinfeld · · Score: 1
      Heh, an aunt of mine knows coulter well, and assures me she doesn't believe most of what she says. In her own words, she has no qualms about telling the book buying public what they hope to hear from her, both liberals, conservatives and anyone else. It's just good business.

      I have no doubt that she is merely doing what Colbert does, only staying in character more and taking the winguts for a very profitable ride.

      She gets $30,000 per speaking engagement and the wingnut 'think' tanks buy tens of thousands of copies of her books. Or did before she went off message with her last rant.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:Disgraceful by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      In other words, she's an intellectual prostitute. Wonderful. I know a few people like that. And I'm convinced the world would be better off if they would just slink back to the primordial ooze they came from.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    4. Re:Disgraceful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except what she does is dangerous and promotes bigotry, hatred, and stupidity.

    5. Re:Disgraceful by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 1

      Next you will be telling me that Ann Coulter only accuses the 9/11 widows of enjoying the death of their spouses to get attention.

      I doubt that the 9/11 widows enjoyed the deaths of their spouses, but I'll be they do enjoy the money, the power, and the attention that resulted.

  5. Who hasn't by packetmon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    ? Well? Anyone? Who hasn't trolled up an issue to some extent to get a fix on a certain group of individuals. Military does it, businesses do it, news agencies do it, and the list goes on and on...

    There's No Such Thing as Overconfidence

    The best in every business are likely to strike most people as irrationally confident, but that's how they got to the top.

    Richard Branson, Bill Gates, Michael Dell -- they first believed in themselves, utterly, and let their belief be their guide. Sure they experienced numerous obstacles and setbacks and failures. Confidence allowed them to keep getting up and looking for ways to move forward.

    Most importantly, leaders like Branson and Gates prioritized believing in the people around them. Confidence is also not arrogance, and unless your employees think that they're better human beings in general than everyone else, let them believe that they're good enough to do exceptional things.

    Legends Never Say They're Sorry

    Having a long or frequent memory for mistakes and a short or infrequent memory for successes is a guaranteed way to develop fear of failure. High achievers dwell on what they do well -- and spend very little time evaluating themselves and their performances.

    Learn from your mistakes? Of course. The road to success is full of adversity from which we can gain significant insight. The key, however, is to set aside specific, deliberate times for evaluation. Process setbacks, errors, and your performance in general only at times when you have planned to.

    The alternative is to get caught up in second-guessing, doubt, and worry whenever things look a bit gray. You excel during the tough moments by having a positive blueprint to look at -- and to have a positive blueprint, you have to spend a lot of time looking at the image of success.

    ... REVERSE PSYCHOLOGY FOR SUCCESS
    1. Re:Who hasn't by HotmanParisHiltonKam · · Score: 1

      Of course this hogwash is coloured by one person's definition of success. Having enough money to feed evey person on the globe, without actually doing so, is not necessarily everyone's primary goal in life (whether a capitalist can believe that or not).

    2. Re:Who hasn't by yndrd1984 · · Score: 1
      Having enough money to feed evey person on the globe, without actually doing so, is not necessarily everyone's primary goal in life (whether a capitalist can believe that or not).

      A "capitalist" is someone who advocates a free market, or someone who owns a lot of capital (productive property) - neither definition tells you what their life goals are.

      I guess my point is that using "capitalist" where you really mean "money obsessed" is as bad as saying "socialist" in place of "lazy bum". You're insulting a very large group of people when you really should be focusing on a much smaller one that's (at best) only slightly related.

  6. Cowboy Neal in Slashdot troll shocker! by caluml · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cowboy Neal in Slashdot troll shocker! Read all about it for only $19.99 at all good book stores

    1. Re:Cowboy Neal in Slashdot troll shocker! by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

      Cowboy Neal in Slashdot troll shocker! Read all about it for only $19.99 at all good book stores

      if you subscribe, you can beat the rush and see it early! :P

  7. Re:O RLY? by ParticleMan911 · · Score: 0

    Since when do mac users need to pay any more for an external hard drive? Standard USB 2.0/Firewire external hard drives are compatible with any modern PC and Mac.

    --

    --
    Are you a Chipotle Fan?
  8. Idiot moron troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Has anyone else noticed tags being censored, as Dvorak seems to be immune to the usual tags of "idiot moron troll"?

    1. Re:Idiot moron troll? by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 2, Funny

      People must not be rolling high enough to overcome his Tag Resistance.

  9. Trolling? by skinfitz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The thing is though one has to understand that the Mac community is a tiered structure. At the top there are we Mac users who are experienced computer users, who understand what we are doing and how computers and operating systems work and accept the existence of things such as 'bugs' and 'vulnerabilities' etc.

    Unfortunately the thing that gives us all a bad name are the very vocal ignorant users that for example simply flat out refuse to accept any criticism of Apple or it's products whatsoever - in fact I'd go as far to say it becomes a religious issue as no matter how much evidence they are confronted with, they either are not capable of comprehending what is being presented to them or if they are, refuse to even consider it as this could mean Apple *might* be wrong and as they know, this cannot possibly happen as they consider Apple infallible.

    Very, very odd behaviour and quite annoying as for example, should I attempt to get someone to consider a Mac, all it takes is someone they know who has 'heard about those Mac zealots' to put them off.

    Consider also that any comment on apple.slashdot that however truthful, might mention a bug or vulnerability or other otherwise is perceived as a criticism gets modded as troll or flamebait (like this comment for example), tells a lot about the community.

    1. Re:Trolling? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The thing is though one has to understand that the Mac community is a tiered structure. At the top ...

      Interesting post. If you look at the Mac Community 10 years ago, the "Top technical elite" had almost entirely bailed off the platform.

      It was the "very vocal ignorant" zealot-type users that pulled Apple through their dark days. They felt that Apple was getting a bad rap in the press (although it was deserved IMO), and formed this "Evangilista" group which involved flooding the airwaves with denials and counter-arguments to any bit of news which might be perceived as a negative to Apple. The fact that Apple rebounded just validated this behavior and mandated that it must continue.

      So, when the technical users returned for the nice UI and Unix-underpinnings of OS X, they're probably scratching their heads over why every silly little Apple lawsuit is worthy of essays worth of Brand-Loyalist attention, or even makes the papers at all. But at this point everyone in the computing press (not just Dvorak) understands that riling up Mac users = Page Hits and Attention. That is why ever little bit of minor Mac news becomes a major trade story.

      Another issue is that Apple themselves thrives off these super-loyalists. A key element of their product strategy is based on the fact that there's a large group of wealthy Appleites that will buy anything they put out for a maximum premium. I saw these stats recently that showed that over 40% of Omni users are already running on Intel Macs. Omni is a small developer favored by the super-loyalists, but that's an astounding level of uptake even among that crowd. So, tossing the zealots an occasional pile of red meat really only helps Apple.

      I suspect, but can't prove, that the "Evangilista" still exists (formally or infomally, sponsord by Apple or not). There's several Slashot users that one can count on only seeing when there's some bad Apple news to spin.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    2. Re:Trolling? by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      I ran into this on the macrumors forums just yesterday. There was an article about that DRM protest, and these rabid fanbois were FOAMING AT THE MOUTH defending DRM. It was unreal to see a bunch of people who so strongly supported DRM. In fact, outside of someone who PROFITS from DRM, these idiots were the only people I've EVER seen defend that bullshit. It was really mind-blowing.

      A lot of my friends accuse me of being a mac fanboy, or even a zealot, because I strongly believe the platform is superior and try to get as many people as possible to switch. If I'm a zealot, what the hell are those whackjobs over at MR?

    3. Re:Trolling? by MustardMan · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, the new intel macs represent a MASSIVE leap forward in terms of speed and flexibility of a system. The laptops were stagnant as hell, with Apple trying to squeeze years of extra life out of the G4, a processor that should have died a long time ago. I had a G4 ibook, and upgraded to a 13" macbook the week it came out - even with the stock 512 megs of Ram, and the shitty intel integrated graphics, my macbook is faster than my ibook...

      and the macbook is running two OSes at once via parallels!

      Mac folks are certainly ones who like to upgrade and upgrade often - they like to have the newest and shiniest goodies from the Holy Land in cupertino. The Intel switch, though, is something a little bit extra-special, as it represents not an incremental speed bump but a massive leap.

      And one final point - you can usually sell an Apple product a year after you bought it and only take around a 10-20% loss. That's pretty remarkable for a computer - a Dell sure doesn't hold its value like that. I know more than one Apple user (myself included) who takes the extra money it would cost to get a 3-year applecare plan, and uses that money to upgrade in a year by selling the old system off on ebay and buying a newer, better one. Part of why mac users upgrade so often is because it's actually fairly cheap to do so if you are smart about it.

    4. Re:Trolling? by Handover+Phist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Thank god us Linux users dont have to put up with that sort of thing!

    5. Re:Trolling? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree that the Intel Macs are sweet machines -- and the G4 PowerBook upgrade curve was so bleh that there was probably massive pent up demand for fast laptops.

      But even in the PowerPC dark days I observed this behavior among certain users. There's several people I know who continually rotate through multiple Macs and iPods, just because that's a convienent way to spend their (inherited) savings. I don't care what the resale value is, selling a PB 1.3Ghz and buying a 1.5Ghz, or buying a G4 Mini "because it's cute" when you already have a G5 Tower isn't really rational behavior. And these people tend to talk much like the zealous posts seen on the interweb.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    6. Re:Trolling? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is some rational basis for Mac users defending iTunes DRM -- it runs on Macs while the others don't. After a decade of seeing Macs being cut out of one market or another, having an Apple technology ontop in one segement is small victory. I'm not saying that justifies the extermism, but it does explain it.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    7. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should say that Omni is a favorite for NeXTStep loyalists, not the old Apple loyalists in the dark ages...

    8. Re:Trolling? by IntlHarvester · · Score: 2, Funny

      Haven't you heard? All Mac programs* should be rewritten in Objective-C and Cocoa, and any failure to do so is evidence of complete, traitorous disloyalty to the Mac community. In fact, there's strong evidence that Carbon programs aren't really Mac programs at all! Omni are the gods of Cocoa, and therefore the most loyal Apple developer and most deserving of Zealot support.

      Seriously, expecting any historical consistency out of this crowd is pointless. Intel processors suck because they are "CISC", remember.

      *except the Apple programs that are written in carbon (almost all of them)

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    9. Re:Trolling? by Drizzt+Do'Urden · · Score: 1

      That's so true!

      I have a Intel iMac 17", it's a really nice machine, fastest Mac and fastest Windwos machine I saw in a long time (and I work as a computer technician).

      I think your parent comment doesn't render justice to the OmniGroup. Has the person tried any flagship Omni product (like OmniGraffle). It (OmniGraffle) just makes Vision look like an ugly hack! It's really fast (even on a 400Mhz PowerBook G4) and really easy to use, and still it was made by a really small team of developpers, who made the original MacOS X Quake 3 port.

      They are very good developpers making very good products, and I guess the Universal Binary building was just a recompile for them.

    10. Re:Trolling? by Twid · · Score: 1
      I suspect, but can't prove, that the "Evangilista" still exists (formally or infomally, sponsord by Apple or not). There's several Slashot users that one can count on only seeing when there's some bad Apple news to spin.


      Hey, I post at other times too! :)
      --
      - "When you want something with all your heart, the entire universe conspires to give it to you" -Paulo Coelho
    11. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you look at the Mac Community 10 years ago, the "Top technical elite" had almost entirely bailed off the platform.

      Yep. We were all on NeXTSTEP.

    12. Re:Trolling? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Actually, there is financial sense to rotating thru gadgets. My brother-in-law, who is not a Mac head, does this with his gadgets and always has the latest and greatest. He sells a gadget every six months to a year on ebay and buys a new one, taking an average of 20% loss (guessing here). He puts about $500 into new gadgets every year, beyond what he recoups on ebay.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    13. Re:Trolling? by FangVT · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There's several Slashot [sic] users that one can count on only seeing when there's some bad Apple news to spin.

      I agree with most all of your post, but on this point I'd like to make it clear that there are Slashdot users that can be counted on both pro and con. Every story brings out the apologists, the attackers and the defenders, as well as both the informed and the uniformed.

    14. Re:Trolling? by rreay · · Score: 1

      Omni's tools started shipping with the OS relatively recently. I've been watching these numbers as well, but I've been assuming that newer machines are heavily overrepresent simply because people with older machines would have to know about and download them themselves. people on newer machines just need to try all the apps in /Applications.

    15. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mac folks are certainly ones who like to upgrade and upgrade often

      I think it depends heavily on what mac users you know. I know myself and several others who are still using clamshell ibooks by choice, whether for ergonomics or simply because they still handle email and web browsing at nice snappy speeds...

    16. Re:Trolling? by GaryPatterson · · Score: 1

      I used to be a member of Guy Kawasaki's 'EvangeList' (albeit a distant member) and it was fun at the time, and good to counter a *lot* of misinformation about the platform.

      I'd be surprised if anything like it existed today though. I've not heard a peep about it for ages.

    17. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations on the stupidest post ever.

    18. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There is some rational basis for Mac users defending iTunes DRM -- it runs on Macs while the others don't.
      On the other hand, Apple refuses to license iTunes DRM to others while Apple is free to purchase and use the others' DRM (MS DRM, at least). The others' DRM can be used on many portable music players while iTunes DRM can only be used on music players made by one company.

      I know, you were talking about personal computers while I talked about portable music players. Maybe Microsoft should produce a crappy Mac port of Windows Media Player (even crappier than iTunes for Windows). To be fair, I think Microsoft should allow Mac software developers (even Apple) to license WMA DRM for free (as in beer). Apple should do the same.

    19. Re:Trolling? by Riquez · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately the thing that gives us all a bad name are the very vocal ignorant users that for example simply flat out refuse to accept any criticism of Apple or it's products whatsoever
      Although there is an element of truth to this, as indeed there is for any product with fans - The Playstation, for example. - I don't think we can say that evangelism exists specifically or only for Mac users.
      The perceived zeolotry of Mac users has a lot to do with victimisation. OS X only has 5% (or thereabouts) share of the OS market & so therefore a vastly larger group of people have the ability to make flames or FUD against Apple, thus leading to the feeling of victimisation. This is exactly what this story about Dvorak is all about.
      If someone says your Computer is rubbish, & you say "no its not" & they scream "ahh, zeolot!" - you're goning to get pretty pissed off & probably retaliate without thinking calmly.
      The other reason this myth perpetuates is that in the Windows community exists a group who love to hate all things Apple. I would see this in the IT dept where I used to work on a daily basis - whatever minor problem existed with their network configuration I would overhear "It's probably those bloody Macs upstairs" followed by loud guffaws and snorts.
      --
      * Game Over * High Score: 264,846,927 -- Your Score: 14
    20. Re:Trolling? by eraserewind · · Score: 1
      There's several Slashot users that one can count on only seeing when there's some bad Apple news to spin.
      I'm curious. How can you possibly tell? I've been reading slashdot for a few years, and the number of non-editor users I can recognise I can count half the fingers of one hand. Slashdot's design doesn't lend itself towards user recognition.
    21. Re:Trolling? by schwatoo · · Score: 1

      Well there is a lot in your post I disagree with, for example, wouldn't the bailing "top technical elite" also mean all the developers bailed too? As a long time mac developer I can assure you that is not true. All the mac developers I knew from back then are still mac developers now (persistence paid off). But the part of your post I can firmly address are the Omni statistics. What you're completely missing is that Omni software ships with every Mac sold today. This means that every intel Mac has a copy of OmniOutliner and/or OmniGraffle sitting in /Applications. Is it really that surprising that the stats on their website reflect that. Is it really any surprise that the Omni stats are skewed towards new machines?

      --
      I have trouble with passwords among other things.
    22. Re:Trolling? by menace3society · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would say that Omni caters largely to the technical elite, coming from the old days of NeXTSTEP and all that. Many loyalists latch onto their products, but that's because their products are useful, intelligent, and technically excellent (something that cannot be said for the evangelistas).

      On the whole, I'd say a 40% conversion ratio isn't totally far-fetched, particularly since many of the people who use Omni's products are themselves developers, and hence need to test on the latest and greatest toys.

    23. Re:Trolling? by Chode2235 · · Score: 1

      I'm confused....

      Are we actually talking about apple now, or are we still symbolically talking about the 'war on terra' and the United States?

      I think your post is a veiled message about geopolitics, but on the other hand seems true about apple too.

  10. VIVE LE QUÉBEC LIBRE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talk about starting a bonfire with a flamethrower

    1. Re:VIVE LE QUÉBEC LIBRE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      de gaul 'o de man

  11. Like bugs to a bug-zappin light by MikeRT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He makes great stats for years doing this, ups the ante by admitting that he knows it's the key to his success (thereby getting a lot of people to show up again) and now, the question is, will people stop reading him? Of course not. For the same reason that the right can't ignore Ted Rall and the left, Ann Coulter. He's the Rall and Coulter rolled into one of the tech press.

    1. Re:Like bugs to a bug-zappin light by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but one thing glossed over by your analogy is the fact that Ted Rall (whom I think is almost never funny, and is relatively unknown) doesn't show up regularly on television, spewing his ill-informed hatred of his perceived political enemies. Coulter does. I guess my point is that the idea that people can become popular by being outrageous is not really accurate; they can do that if and only if they are aided and abetted by the owners of the media outlet they rely on.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  12. So what? by eagl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    In other news, slashdot posters guilty of posting comments intended to spark debate and foster discussion of interesting topics!

    It's sort of like accusing a congressman of creating and passing good legislation because he has a secret desire to get re-elected, or accusing someone of going to work to get paid. Imagine the nerve of some people!

    1. Re:So what? by MouseR · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Half the comments and stories on /. about Macs or Mac users are trolls anyhow.

      Most Mac users are immune to that. Mac N00bs voice their discontent. But they tend to be happy at the next PC virus wave anyhow.

      I still here because the other half of stories and comments are worth a read. And it helps me understand what makes a Linux Joe a Linux Joe and keep current on THEIR fight against MS. Like we have our own, but we like to see what's going on on other fronts.

    2. Re:So what? by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      It's sort of like accusing a congressman of creating and passing good legislation because he has a secret desire to get re-elected, or accusing someone of going to work to get paid. Imagine the nerve of some people!

      There's a slight difference between writing a well informed, interesting article that sparks debate and draws reader and speading disinformation and making inflammatory statements to illict responses from others.

      One type of writing is editorial journalism, the other belongs on the pages of Weekly World News

  13. advertising, not "stats" by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [SNIP]Dave Winer has Dvorak on video describing his methodology for trolling the Mac community to pump up his stats." [SNIP] I have to admit I'm also guilty of posting the occasional inflammatory story, but I find it's usually best to suffix the title with a question mark, and let our ever-knowledgeable readers hash out the issue and decide for themselves.

    You do it for the same reason Dvorak did it. Not to boost "stats"- to boost advertising revenue by increasign page hits. A 300-post thread is thrilling advertising-wise compared to a 30-comment thread. It's always about increasing advertising revenues.

    The evil "main stream media" has a term for it: sensationalism. You should attract readers via the quality of your content, not its controversialism. These days I see the average tech story on the homepage of my city's newspaper 1, 2, 3 days before it hits slashdot- and half the time, it's an AP wire story! Gone are the days when the media outlets didn't have contacts in the tech industry or didn't "understand" it. Slashdot's become a real bore, and the quality of commentary both on the part of editors and readers has gone straight downhill.

    1. Re:advertising, not "stats" by emmons · · Score: 1

      Yet it is wildly successful. What does that say about your argument regarding quality?

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    2. Re:advertising, not "stats" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot poster ranting about sensationalism, with a sensationalist sig, complaining about the quality of slashdot. Perfect.

  14. Slashdotted, see it on YouTube by tdvaughan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Link to the video. The sound was out of sync for me, but he basically comes across as a smug arse.

    1. Re:Slashdotted, see it on YouTube by blackcoot · · Score: 2, Funny

      this is standard procedure for dvorak --- if you don't believe me, listen to the "this week in tech" (aka twit) podcast. as far as i'm concerned, he gets filed together with used car sales people and 97% of politicians under "people i may or may not swerve to avoid on the street"

  15. The question mark by trifish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but I find it's usually best to suffix the title with a question mark, and let our ever-knowledgeable readers hash out the issue and decide for themselves.

    Which is, unfortunately, the case with many Slashdot (and most Digg) stories. As soon as I see a sensationalistic title ending with a question mark, I automatically skip to the next story.

    1. Re:The question mark by kfg · · Score: 2

      As soon as I see a sensationalistic title ending with a question mark, I automatically skip to the next story.

      He fooled you this time by leaving off the question mark.

      KFG

    2. Re:The question mark by kertong · · Score: 1

      "As soon as I see a sensationalistic title ending with a question mark, I automatically skip to the next story."

      That's nice. want a cookie?

    3. Re:The question mark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's nice. want a cookie?

      And the point is?

  16. Question Mark ? by 88NoSoup4U88 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have to admit I'm also guilty of posting the occasional inflammatory story, but I find it's usually best to suffix the title with a question mark, and let our ever-knowledgeable readers hash out the issue and decide for themselves.
    Ohwait, make that : Dvorak Admits To Trolling Mac Users ?

    :D
  17. ha by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    He can now make another article about how apple paid him to say this. That'll be an awesome way to continue the trolling.

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
  18. Brace yourselves by BMonger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dvorak admits to trolling Mac users and Rosen admits the RIAA is wrong... apparently they know the second coming is happening soon and want to get some things off their chest.

    REPENT I SAY!

    1. Re:Brace yourselves by baKanale · · Score: 1

      the second coming is happening soon

      But 6/6/06 already happened.

    2. Re:Brace yourselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you idiot, the Second Coming was in the year 666 AD, but nobody noticed. Satan has ruled the world for the past 1340 years! (yeah, I know Revelations says something about a thousand years, but at the end of the deadline, God was taking a break trying to deal with Europe and completely ignored Satan! Come on, people!)

  19. Breaking News! You won't believe it! by Kelson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, this does remind me of one of those stories where someone does a scientific study to find out something that "everyone already knows."

    Except, of course, we didn't all know it before, we suspected it, and assumed it was true. Every once in a while you find out that something "everyone knows" isn't true after all, so getting confirmation does have value.

  20. Has CowboyNeal stopped beating his wife? by identity0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    We Slashdot users, of course, will never stoop to such measures just to get modded up :)

  21. Two things by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Two things...

    First, do we have a confirmed source for this? The YoutTube video is INCREDIBLY out of sync. Can anybody confirm that it is indeed him speaking and not someone doing a voice-over?

    My second question is, now that Cowboy Neal himself has commented on this, does that mean Slashdot editors will stop posting his stories finally? Something inside tells me it won't change a damn thing because much like Dvorak, Slashdot also gets large amounts of revenue from posting his trolling stories.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To answer your first question: The .mov torrent is perfectly in sync, unlike the youTube clip.

      I think you already answered the second question yourself.

  22. Since he's still around... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It must be really working. Apple fanboys have no one but themselves to blame.

  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. Michael Moore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Dvorak is nothing other than the worlds most successful troll.
    Are we forgetting Michael Moore?
    1. Re:Michael Moore by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      How about Bill, I'm the only one who gets to spin on my show and the minute I'm shown to be wrong I cut your mike, O'Reilly?

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    2. Re:Michael Moore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll grant you they're both blowhards, but I think you'll find that Mike has better name recognition. And that's the whole point of being a Troll, isn't it?

  25. Everything in this post is SO OS9 (Re:O RLY?) by aergern · · Score: 1

    Aqua is no more dumbed down the Gnome is in Ubuntu 6.06 which I use at work.. but it is better layed out the Windows is..

    Mac users DO not pay double or triple for ANY external device .. you make things up and look stupid for it. I have 4x300G Seagates in plain external enclosures. *ding* Go back to the end of the line and please try again.

    The heat issue was a mistake that has been corrected.. IBM, HP or Dell never make mistakes in manufacturing? Yeah.. right. Moron.

    --
    Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
    1. Re:Everything in this post is SO OS9 (Re:O RLY?) by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      That's right! You tell him! He should have never posted that helpful link!!

      Who are you replying to?

    2. Re:Everything in this post is SO OS9 (Re:O RLY?) by BobPaul · · Score: 1

      Oh, never mind... it looked like the parent was someone else. I'd blame the new discussion system, but I'm probably just dumb.

  26. Re:O RLY? by ThePooka · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that understood that this was meant to be funny? (Change its score, for chrissakes...)

  27. The irony... by Chief+Typist · · Score: 1

    This video is a troll on the Mac community.

    -ch

  28. meta-troll by weierstrass · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is itself a troll. The video does not show Dvorak saying these things, but has him talking with the audio completely out of sync. From the FTA:
    he started telling a story about how he deliberately pisses Mac users off to get flow for his stories, and I said, hold a minute, I want to record this, and shit if he didn't stop and repeat it for me and my video camera. I guess now I'm an official video blogger
    Think about it, if you were doing well by professional trolling (and I'm not saying he's not) would you talk about it on video, and lose all that revenue by 'serious' news sites deciding not to link to you anymore? This is a hoax. It's also probably one of these things that ring so true that everyone goes on acting as though they were even after they're discredited, like Al Gore inventing the Internet.
    --
    my password really is 'stinkypants'
    1. Re:meta-troll by MustardMan · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because re-encoding a video NEVER puts the sound of out sync.

      Watch the original available from TFA - it's perfectly in sync.

    2. Re:meta-troll by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Think about it, if you were doing well by professional trolling (and I'm not saying he's not) would you talk about it on video, and lose all that revenue by 'serious' news sites deciding not to link to you anymore?

      Everyone is pretty much on to him at this point, so by admitting it, he can troll the Mac users one last time. In a few years, everyone will have forgotten about it and he can start the cycle by trolling them again. This happened before when he was fired from MacWorld.

      Most of the stuff that Dvorak said was so batty (Itanium Macs?) that it was doubtful that anyone really thought he was being all that serious.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    3. Re:meta-troll by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      If it wasn't slashdotted I would. Besides, the man GETS NO SPAM! That's pretty awesome. ^_~

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    4. Re:meta-troll by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      somebody doesn't get Spam (R)??
      quick you get on the phone to a trucking company you call up hormel and find where the nearest warehouse is

      (note to self make sure to sub turkey spam if he he requires it to be "kosher")

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    5. Re:meta-troll by Swift2001 · · Score: 1

      Gee! Dvorak a troll? Oh, my God. Next you're gonna tell me they didn't find WMD in Iraq, and the people didn't greet us as liberators. That's ridiculous!

    6. Re:meta-troll by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 1

      The word is "unpossible".

      You're welcome.

  29. One thing about Dvorak by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 1

    Don't forget he gets no spam.

    dvorak.org/blog

    I think he is funny on TWIT, he is always getting things wrong it cracks me up.

  30. Trolling Nothing New by PhreakinPenguin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Trolling is nothing new especially when you look right here on Slashdot every day. What gets Slashdot the most pageviews? Stories about Microsoft. The anti MS people comment like crazy while the pro MS people do the same. I swear there could be a story about finding a cure for cancer above a story about Microsoft and the Microsoft story would have more comments.

    --


    My sig of choice is Marlboro
    1. Re:Trolling Nothing New by joe+155 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      in all fairness there is very little to say about a cure for cancer if it turns out to be true other than "good. glad we figured this one out" - it hardly makes for interesting comments. Now a good ol' troll on MS can lead to thousands of opinions and is really the basis of pretty much all tech discussions... which is why we find it so easy to talk about

      --
      *''I can't believe it's not a hyperlink.''
    2. Re:Trolling Nothing New by aukset · · Score: 1

      Heard of the HPV vaccine yet?

      Nothing (not even a cancer vaccination) is free from controversy, apparently.

      --
      No sig now
  31. Re:O RLY? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why do they pay double or triple price for simple pieces of hardware that works with Mac like an external USB hard drive?

    If you can get me an external HDD enclosure for $8.00 including shipping, please post the vendor's name and address here.

    Otherwise, I'll continue to recommend the $24 enclosures for Mac users.

  32. Can Not Compute! by mattwarden · · Score: 1

    Dave Winer has Dvorak on video

    Calculating hatred ratio, Winer:Dvorak...

    Warning: overflow
    Warning: overflow
    Warning: overflow
    Warning: overflow
    DOES NOT COMPUTE! ERRORRR!!@@
    1. Re:Can Not Compute! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rotfl! ;)

    2. Re:Can Not Compute! by apflwr3 · · Score: 1

      rotfl! ;) rotfl! ;)

  33. OFF TOPIC but I dont care by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "and let our ever-knowledgeable readers hash out the issue and decide for themselves."

    And when your not manipulatively inflammatory against "the other camp", your a manipulative kiss-ass to this one.

  34. Overtonnage Overkillers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ann Coulter is the rightwing Anchor Troll in their "Overton Window" strategy.

    It's a simple way to force the public debate "spectrum window" to your end of the spectrum by trolling unthinkable statements in public. Successful trolls create only predictable responses, not any further development of the ideas. So the "unthinkable" is now part of the public conversation, without risking rejection by anyone actually thinking about it. Changing the ideas in the public window of the spectrum moves the window closer to the new idea. Now the window includes more of the thinkable ideas that were excluded or marginalized, while the window excludes or marginalizes the ideas previously more in the "center", but further away from the troll.

    The only risk with overtonning the window is that the troll discredits its entire end of the spectrum by association. Which is why it's important that the troll make as extreme, ridiculous comments as possible. And frequently defend their statements with "I was just kidding". The associates who benefit from the troll in their neighborhood must also not even repudiate the troll, as any association (positive or negative) is contagious. The troll must work alone. Though of course they can be paid by the same beneficiaries, or have their "home markets" all subsidized by the same beneficiaries.

    Now Ann Coulter actually makes sense, probably for the first time. As do her fellow trolls like Rush Limbaugh, Bill O'Reilly, and most of the rightwing talkradioheads.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by thedogcow · · Score: 0, Troll

      what? That made no sense at all.

      --
      Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    2. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Funny

      You and your comment should be annihilated, after being burned alive watching your family forced to cannibalize each other.

      See? It works, even in response to an overton attack. Of course, when opposing ends of a spectrum overton, the arms race makes the rubble bounce.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    3. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
      You and your comment should be annihilated, after being burned alive watching your family forced to cannibalize each other.

      You've gone too far! They shouldn't have to cannibalize each other!

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
    4. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You missed one requirement (actually, two) that makes Ann Coulter successful in that area. The requirement is that speech that appears in books, on television or radio has inherently more value and more weight than what your neighbor says. Once that goes out the window, there is no way to move the debate in a particular direction by simply having "anchor trolls". The second requirement is that people don't actually recoil in horror at the statements. The sad truth is that the US is a country with fascist undertones, and has more in common with some fascist dictatorships than it has with a lot of democracies. This means that there is no way to have a left-leaning anchor troll - that would have to be a communist, and we all know what happens to communists here.

      I wouldn't so much say that Coulter is shifting the debate to the right - I'd say she is merely exposing sentiments that are already part of the national undercurrent. Which is far scarier.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    5. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by feyhunde · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're Quoting the Daily Kos about Ann Coulter being a troll?

      Kettle, meet Pot.

      --
      I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    6. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Squirrelgirl · · Score: 0

      What about Lewis Black?

    7. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't read Dvoraks blog, have you?

    8. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Burz · · Score: 1

      This only works if media conglomerates develop a preference for inflammatory rightwing invective in the first place.

    9. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Moderation 0
          50% Funny
          50% Flamebait

      See? It works, even in response to an overton attack. Of course, when opposing ends of a spectrum overton, the arms race makes the rubble bounce.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    10. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Fascism is rightwing. Fascism is corporate government, communicating with the people through only violence and propaganda.

      Perfect for media corporations. Trolls are their national bird.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    11. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Try reading either my post, or the message I quoted, before posting gibberish.

      You're posting a troll calling a nontroll a troll. You've already met more pot than you can handle.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    12. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by thornist · · Score: 1

      But Lewis Black, great as he is, presents as a comedian. If Ann Coulter presented as a comedian she'd bomb - she isn't funny. And Lewis Black doesn't get to have the kind of effect on the overton window that Coulter does. She somehow manages to get herself presented as a serious pundit.

    13. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're making my point for me. A) he's a comedian. Like George Carlin or Carlos Mencia, they overstate their case to make a point. They know it's preposterous, we know it's preposterous, and we laugh about it. B) If you compare his political diatribes with the speeches of some (elected) European politicians, he actually comes across of fairly center.

      The fact that you bring him up as a possible counter troll to Ann Coulter shows just how far on the right the US sits.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    14. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Starting Score: 1 point
      Moderation -1
          100% Flamebait

      TrollMods fly their corporate media propaganda flags on Slashdot. Even while they anonymously suppress the simple truth.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    15. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Moderation 0
              50% Funny
              50% Flamebait

      See? It works, even in response to an overton attack. Of course, when opposing ends of a spectrum overton, the arms race makes the rubble bounce.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    16. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Burz · · Score: 1

      Your mention of violence reminds me of a similar description of fascism:

      http://www.peopleforchange.net/forums/index.php?sh owtopic=30633&st=15#

      Fascism is a natural choice when corporations want to spread their underlying values through the rest of society: Internally corps are rigid authoritarian heirarchies with almost no room for democracy. The CEO acts as strict father figure, so naturally the public sector counterpart to this is 'fuhrer'. These major organs of capitalism deem themselves a 'natural' order, whereas fascists work to shoehorn government into the 'organic' mold of the patriarchal family.

      Now examine corporate newspeak and ask what is the single most important qualifier besides profit when evaluating individuals: To me that is "Agressive". In fact there are times when it comes out of corporatists mouths almost once per sentence (sometimes more). "Agressive... agressive... agressively... AGRESSIVE..." Depending on who's speaking, it starts to sound like quacking or barking.

      Coming back to network news, note the trend in anchors standing up (even prancing) to deliver the news. This connotes a position of authority (a professor, a team coach, a military commander). They also seem two steps shy of barking or shouting the way a commander would; I don't think 'urgency' quite describes the way they often speak.

    17. Re:Overtonnage Overkillers by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      China is fascist. The British Empire and mercantile Holland were fascist outside Britain and Holland, in their colonies. And less than fascist at home in the same measure that they were constitutional democracies.

      Fascism is the government face on the corporate body. It thereby communicates with propaganda covering its violence, to prevent the people from organizing to resist - and keep them hurting each other. The US is marching down the same fascist road paved by its British predecessor, with Britain following as closely as its better organized people allow.

      These fascisms are pretty obvious to me. The degree to which fascism is unclear to Americans in those countries and at home is a measure of how American fascist propaganda and violence have already succeeded.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  35. Apple on Itanium by jbailey999 · · Score: 1

    I hadn't seen any announcement about Itanium macs, but I'd certainly assumed that's what was going to happen. For all of the money that Intel has pissed away on Itanium, I had assumed two things:

    1) They must come out with an interesting version eventually.

    2) A great time to announce that they'd made the things interesting would be with a huge splash announcement like Apple adopting it.

    The roadmap of desktops now, laptops shortly would be pretty consistant with a technology breakthrough.

    Pity it didn't happen. It's sad to see the processor world still dancing around the stinking carcass of x86.

    1. Re:Apple on Itanium by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      I suppose it made some sensational sense, but the real news was that HP was dropping Itanium Workstations, and MS was stopping XP for IA64, making it practically impossible for that a desktop Itaniums for Macs would ever appear. Not that I expect Dvorak to know anything about chip roadmaps.

      But to be fair, the ultimtely correct Apple/Intel rumors were swirling around and he was just trying to spice them up a bit.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  36. Mac by mfh · · Score: 1

    I don't mind. Mac trolls windows users with their ads -- so it's fair game.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  37. Interesting ... by khasim · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Others might call it trolling but if you call it "catering to your market" it's a great way to make moniey.
    Interesting. You know another way to make "moniey"? Have sex with strangers who will pay you.

    Now ... if only there was a word for the kind of person who does that.
    1. Re:Interesting ... by jdgeorge · · Score: 1
      Others might call it trolling but if you call it "catering to your market" it's a great way to make moniey.

      Interesting. You know another way to make "moniey"? Have sex with strangers who will pay you.

      Now ... if only there was a word for the kind of person who does that.


      Of course there is. Following the well-thought-out logic of the GP, the word you are looking for is caterer.
    2. Re:Interesting ... by wolfponddelta · · Score: 1
      Now ... if only there was a word for the kind of person who does that

      This is far too easy... Do I even bother? Ooohhhh... I have to say it. If I don't someone else will, and I'm just in the mood. The body of christ compels me... Politicians? Lawyers? Talking heads on "news" programs? Software programmers?

    3. Re:Interesting ... by wolfponddelta · · Score: 1

      Oops... Didn't mean to troll with the programmers thing. Just popped out. I have nothing against Developers, and in fact happen to live with one.

      Must be the subconscious leaking out again. Someone needs to make a protective undergarment for that.

    4. Re:Interesting ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...mom?

    5. Re:Interesting ... by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      No need to diss hookers, dude. What they do is honest.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    6. Re:Interesting ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Now ... if only there was a word for the kind of person who does that.

      Do you mean "honey"?

    7. Re:Interesting ... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      What, like Freudian Boxers or something?

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
  38. Re:UI Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot's new layout fits right in with Vista.

  39. Re:It's called advertising. by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

    Ever ask yourself how so many Dvorak posts end of on the front page of Slashdot?

    Slashdot owes it's success to posting trolls on it's front page all day, every day.

    These Dvorak columns got huge comment responses across every Mac-oriented tech site, ZDNet would be really stupid to be paying people to post them. The slashvertisements are for the random hardware products that get posted or the crappy unknown hardware review sites.

    --
    Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  40. As UK tabloids columnists know.. by abigsmurf · · Score: 1

    Nothing gets people reading like a controversial opinion. When ad services pay per view, writing something that goes against popular opinion and getting it posted endlessly on "I can't believe this guy" theads on forums. Who cares if you have to write something that isn't inline with your own views if it can earn you a quick buck?

  41. Big Surprise...not by themadplasterer · · Score: 1

    Like we really needed him to admit the obvious.

  42. Technical users returning? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UI is not nice, its awful. OSX was a major step backwards for interface consistency, intuitiveness and usability. And the unix underpinnings of OSX make technical users sick to their stomachs. Even those who can tolerate jumbled up random messes like modern linux distros are put off by the horrible job they did of OSX.

    Only the wanna-be technical users think OSX is nice. They are the same ones who think gentoo is nice. They don't know their ass from a hole in the ground. They consider themselves the technical elite, but don't even know the basics yet.

  43. Horse's mouth? by Dorsai65 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Or was that the other end of the horse?

    --
    --- Asking inconvenient questions for over 30 years...
  44. Stop posting stories by or about Dvorak by rbanzai · · Score: 1

    After this story how many more reasons does Slashdot need to stop posting stories by or about Dvorak?

    Just stop. There is plenty of tech news from legitimate sources.

  45. re: sense of humor? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    As far as I'm concerned, the real humor left PC Mag. whenever Penn Jilette quit writing the back page column for them, years ago.

    I don't find Dvorak "funny" ... nor do I take him too seriously. I just find his columns to be full of personal ramblings and random "what if?" type thoughts, tossed out there for the world to read.

  46. That URL is bad, the one in my post is not. by ickeicke · · Score: 1, Informative

    It's the URL that sucks, it ought to be http://mac-sucks.com/ :) .

    --
    Firehed - Unfortunately, thanks to medical breakthroughs, common sense is not as common as it once was.
  47. Dvorak Screws PC Advertisers by sakusha · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I said it before and I'll say it again: Dvorak is deliberately screwing the advertisers that pay for his web hits.

    Dvorak publishes on PC-centric websites, but he trolls Mac users for hits. The PC advertisers are getting screwed, they pay for advertising to PC buyers, Mac users aren't the target audience. The trolling articles draw a massive influx of Mac users, the PC advertisers pay for all those hits from people that will never buy their products.

    The only way Dvorak is going to stop trolling is if the PC advertisers wake up and realize their money is being wasted by a maniac that values his own ego more than he provides value for advertisers.

    1. Re:Dvorak Screws PC Advertisers by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      No, the Mac users are targets of the Windows advertisers, to convince them that the Mac market is too small and that the products they need are easily available under Windows. When it comes to CAD software and games, the Windows advertisers are also corretc.

    2. Re:Dvorak Screws PC Advertisers by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that a lot of Mac users are also Windows users too, especially thanks to Boot Camp.

    3. Re:Dvorak Screws PC Advertisers by ZachPruckowski · · Score: 1

      Most internet advertising is pay-per-click, as I understand it. If Mac users are totally uninterested in ads for stuff for Windows, they don't click on the ads, the advertisers lose nothing. PC Magazine loses bandwidth though. The only way a Mac user who doesn't have Windows would click on a PC ad would be "Hey that looks cool. Oh, the webpage says Windows only. OH well"

    4. Re:Dvorak Screws PC Advertisers by winwar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I said it before and I'll say it again: Dvorak is deliberately screwing the advertisers that pay for his web hits."

      OK everyone, let's shed a tear for the poor advertisers.

      Hey, where did everyone go?!?

      Advertisers aren't innocents. If they get hurt, they went in with their eyes open.....

  48. Has this guy been right? by WheelDweller · · Score: 1

    I remember Dvorak since WAY back...the 8-bit days. Kilobaud Microcomputing and early issues of Byte- that far back. I don't think I've ever heard anything from him that met reality...why do we care, again?

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    1. Re:Has this guy been right? by nancypants · · Score: 1

      Dvorak's an asshole. I thought everyone knew this?

  49. Is this really shocking? by deviator · · Score: 1, Funny

    I like Dvorak. He's a smart & funny guy.

    1. Re:Is this really shocking? by deviator · · Score: 1

      Someone actually modded this comment "Flamebait," though I was being serious.

      I have read Dvorak's columns for about 15 years; he was very pro-OS/2 back in the day (as was I) and generally has a lot of intelligent stuff to say about some things. And he knows how to work it to increase the distribution of his articles. It's his job; who can blame him?

      The fact that people get so worked up over his stuff is their own issue for not seeing that he's just trying to get his numbers up.

  50. "Technical Elite" and Macs by david.emery · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If you look at the Mac Community 10 years ago, the "Top technical elite" had almost entirely bailed off the platform.


    There's some truth to this, but only some truth..


    Of the senior people I work with who were on Macs 10 years ago, at least 50% are still there, and recently some that moved on to Windows are seriously considering moving back. And I'm talking about people like chief engineers, tech directors, etc; not just "old farts" who were unwilling to learn new technologies. Where I used to work, on a "pay scale" of 3..7, with 3.5 being the average paygrade of staff, the self-supporting Mac Users list had an average paygrade of about 5.5. (And that's with a typical pyramid distribution, there were very few paygrade 7s in the company, but I'll bet 10%-15% of those were die-hard Mac users.)


    The primary reason for moving away was usually "Software I wanted wasn't available on the Mac." However, the continued problems with Windows viruses, spyware, malware, etc, plus the strength of the OS X underpinnings of Unix, have been a big part of the re-connection. Most of these same people have substantial Unix backgrounds, so coming back to OS X and popping up a terminal shell, is like 'coming home'. We'll see how much effect MacTel has on the availability of software for the Mac platform.


    But I count myself as a super-loyalist, and that belief was strongly reinforced by the 18 months I spent being forced to use Windows NT (versus MacOS 8 at the time), and my continued attempts to try to maintain a Windows (98->2k->now XP Pro) machine in my home environment (alongside 1 old Mac running OS 9, and 4 Macs running X.4). My informal estimate was that being on Windows cost me between 10 and 30 minutes lost productivity each day at work on the Windows box. Multiplied by 250 days in a year, times my billing rate at the tme, and that's a fair amount of money (enough to buy me a new Mac every 30 months...) And that doesn't include the cost of all the tech support that was provided on the Windows box, that didn't come out of my productivity measure.


    So when I switched jobs (in part because my employer was discontinuing all support for Macs, don't get me started on that situation and the company's unwillingness to back up assertions of life-cycle cost savings with the data we all knew they had collected...), I made it a condition of employment with my new company that they'd provide me with a Mac and make sure their core business systems (e.g. web-based timecards) would be standards-conformant to support not just my Mac, but anyone who wanted to remain on Linux.


    When something better comes along, I'll try it. But I'll point out I bought my first personal computer in Oct 1978, and I've tried just about everything except Windows 3, BoB and Windows ME. Pretty much consistently, at each point in time, the Apple offering was markedly better than the WinTel offering, enough to justify the price (and performance) differential. Linux systems have some significant price/performance advantages over Mac OS X (and certainly over WinTel), but not strong enough usability for the 90% of the stuff I spend my time doing (and that's the stuff that cost me the productivity hit on Windows.)


            dave

    1. Re:"Technical Elite" and Macs by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Yup, as you admit, you are a "super-loyalist". MacOS was a complete shitfest in the late 90s ... even regular users were getting fed-up, the techies were long gone. I do find it kind of humorus that your types are still desperately trying to rewrite the history of MacOS8 vs WinNT, but I don't think you'll get very far outside of the Evangalistas.

      Anyway, thank you for providing an object example to my point about Applenuts that will post essays to counter the slightest infraction.

      Mac Users list had an average paygrade of about 5.5.

      In a lot of organizations, you need a certain amount of "pull" to get a Mac on your desk due to the higher cost structure. Anyway, a silly example that doesn't speak to my point at all.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    2. Re:"Technical Elite" and Macs by dal20402 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      MacOS was a complete shitfest in the late 90s ... even regular users were getting fed-up, the techies were long gone. I do find it kind of humorus that your types are still desperately trying to rewrite the history of MacOS8 vs WinNT, but I don't think you'll get very far outside of the Evangalistas.

      This is a little simplistic. Even in the Mac OS 8/9 era (before OS X became usable for mainstream purposes with Jaguar), which is when Mac OS was technically most embarrassing, there were legitimate uses for it. Its worst weaknesses were the lack of the two PMs and any more than marginal multi-user support. On a dedicated-purpose workstation always running one stable application, it could achieve very long uptimes, and it had real security advantages over any of today's systems. Coupled with the total superiority of the PPC before the G4 stagnated in 2001-03, it's actually not that hard to see why even knowledgeable users in certain fields kept their Macs, and why Apple continued to sell $3000+ Power Mac G4s during the darkest days.

      Now, for the majority of us, the story was different. I waited a very long time after I bought my beige G3 in 1998 to buy another machine, simply assuming the OS X transition was going to fail, the platform was going to die, and I'd need to switch to Windows when the G3 got Too Old. I didn't feel comfortable buying another Mac until the Aluminum PowerBooks and Panther came out in 2003.

      Incidentally, one irony of this history is that Windows has become what many technically knowledgeable users feared the Mac would be twenty years ago: a system where it's almost impossible for the user to assert control over the OS at a granular level. What ultimately keeps me from switching to Windows (besides the superiority of Apple laptop design) is Windows and its applications' consistent and deliberate obfuscation of every modification they make, which has just gotten worse in every generation of Windows since 95, and which is promising to get even worse in Vista. Of course Linux in general doesn't suffer this problem, but I need an OS that will run mainstream music production software, and Linux ain't it.

    3. Re:"Technical Elite" and Macs by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      As soon as Microsoft put some decent OS products on the market, Apple went from enormous profits to enormous losses, and ended up losing the majority of their market presence, forcing them to radically reshape their product marketing strategy. Was MacOS "good enough"? One can argue techncial details until the end of time, but from a business standpoint, it clearly wasn't.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    4. Re:"Technical Elite" and Macs by david.emery · · Score: 1
      In a lot of organizations, you need a certain amount of "pull" to get a Mac on your desk due to the higher cost structure.


      Exactly my point. Those with "pull" are exactly those who I claim to be "Top technical elite" , or at least relatively highly correlated with the "Top technical elite" , and those who had much more choice about computing platforms than the average tech staff. The fact that they exercised that pull is my specific counter-example to your claim that he "Top technical elite" had almost entirely bailed off the platform.


      It might be a silly example, but I assert it most certainly speaks to (actually argues against) your point about "Top technical elite" abandoning the platform. I don't mind my post being called silly, but I disagree that it's irrelevant...


            dave
         

    5. Re:"Technical Elite" and Macs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YHBT HAND

    6. Re:"Technical Elite" and Macs by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      Well, as an American, a high "pay grade" implies some sort of government union bureaucracy, which usually is just the opposite of a technically elite organization. Apologies if my biases entered the discussion.

      I should say that I found ye olde Mac OS phenomenal from a user-oriented design perspective -- far beyond OS X and NT and NextStep and other nerd-toys. But still, when running a web browser became an arduous task, and Mac-using friends came to me astounded by the multi-tasking abilities of Windows 98 (!), it was clear that MacOS was profoundly failing user demands in the late 1990s. Sure some technical users stuck to the Mac for the basic UI goodness, but let's be honest here -- there was very little else going for the platform, and it was a lame duck that Apple management had failed on multiple opportunities to replace.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
  51. Companies vs Their Products; The Nature of Flaming by Locus+Mote · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Mac trolls windows users with their ads.

    "Mac" is the brand name of a product line (of computers) made by Apple. Products do not troll. Apple is a company, so if trolling is being done, it is Apple (or more specifically Apple Marketing) that is doing it. Choose your nouns carefully!

    Apple's OS X v. Windows XP ads are hardly trolling. It is not trolling when a company compares their product line against their competitor's in a non-subjective way.

    When I pull up the terminal window and type 'uptime' my Mac will return a date figure which is in months (and for a while there in years + months!) I have owned a PC running Windows XP and this was never the case. So memory fragmentation and frequency of rebooting are a legitimate comparison between the two platforms.

    The iLife suite of applications, like iPhoto, iTunes, iEtc, is far better integrated, reliable and functional than any of the lifestyle applications that Microsoft bundles with Windows. So again, the point that Apple is making is legitimate. Just because you don't like the comparisons being drawn does not make the act of doing so flaming any more than my debate with you is flaming. Too often people call out others for flaming simply based on the fact that they don't like what the other party is saying.

    This is not the case with Dvorak. I've been reading him since the late 80s/early 90s. While not being as overtly ridiculous a buffoon as someone like Bill O'Reilly, Dvorak's idea of "fair and balanced" is about as legitimate as that of Fox News. He often chooses which facts to include in a story to give it the slant he wants. He is consitently anti-Apple and makes little attempt to hide the fact. He reminds me of 60-Minutes' Andy Rooney or that idiot on ABC News, John Stossel. (Note: That bit about John Stossel was flaming. The man has the epistemological skills of a turnip and regularly makes an ass of himself on national television.)

    The point isn't to hate Dvorak or harbor any emotion toward him whatsoever. The point is that he exists and has the right to voice his opinion, just like when skinheads march or Rupert Murdoch distorts the news. The only way to make people like them go away is to stop listening to them. How many times is a guy like Dvorak going to cry wolf (or inferior product) before people learn to roll their eyes at him? How many people in this country listen to writers like him because they're simply looking for someone they perceive to be in a position of authority (paid writer) to legitimize the things they already want to believe? It is not about facts, truth, or knowledge, it's all about spin.

  52. What is this "trolling" you speak of? by jayhawk88 · · Score: 1

    If Dvorak was smart, he'd get a patent for that word quickly, then sell the rights to Steve Jobs for use in his next MacWorld keynote. You know, the one where Apple is going to announce they are purchasing the country of China, and setting up a new Mac store on Europa?

    1. Re:What is this "trolling" you speak of? by RPoet · · Score: 1

      You can't get a patent on a word. You may be thinking of trademarks.

      --
      "Oppression and harassment is a small price to pay to live in the land of the free." -- Montgomery Burns.
  53. He's joking, isn't he? by mrbarkeeper · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who thinks he is joking? I mean, for all that is wrong with Dvorak, at least he has a sense of humor.

    Where is my irony meter when I need it...

  54. What's the right course of action by suv4x4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Reporters are not supposed to troll, they are supposed to at least believe what they say is correct (even if it's not).

    When John Dvorak writes his typical troll stories, potentially millions of people not familiar with the phenomenon John Dvorak take the article at face value and form opinion of people and products that affect their purchase choice and they also share the misinformation with other people.

    Tell a lie enough times, and it stops being a lie in people's minds.

    So are "Mac zealots" to be mocked about reacting strongly to lies spread in the media, or should the liears not exist in first place?

    It's not so funny that media use misinformation just to drive ad impressions up. That's really low of them.

  55. Planet Spin by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    It is not about facts, truth, or knowledge, it's all about spin.

    It is funny, isn't it? In this age of abundant information, understanding seems to be slipping from our (collective) grasp. Since everything is subjective anyway, apparently we should all simply abandon to even attempt objectivity.

    That seems to be the gestalt: In essence, the world is too crazy to figure out. Too many facts. Too many opinions. Just give up and read stuff that makes you feel good about your own assumptions. Dvorak obviously thinks so. He just figures it's all entertainment anyway, so why bother working from facts, when pure conjecture and baiting will serve his purpose much better?

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  56. Manipulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't any one else notice that the video was manipulated - I mean I haven't seen such a dubbing disaster in years.

    1. Re:Manipulated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It can't be manipulated because DVORAK IS TEH EVIL, he also kicks babies and eats puppies!!!

      And we know this couldn't just be him just joking and playing off what Apple fanatics think of him, or anything like that....

  57. Mac Users Admit To Ignoring Dvorak by DaddyBird · · Score: 3, Insightful

    editing: "Tech pundit John Dvorak has long been known for his lame and baseless opinions."
    ... and generating traffic from Mac and PC users as vacuous as he is.

    If Slashdot didn't occasionally regurgitate his vapor I wouldn't know that he was still around.

    --
    I forgot to sig
    1. Re:Mac Users Admit To Ignoring Dvorak by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      troll, dvorak, duh, moron, idiot (tagging beta) --> I wonder what would happen if they weren't ignoring him.

  58. Haha! This should be followed by... by BillX · · Score: 1

    "Oh...wow, I was totally wrong about the dumbed-down interface, and the pricey hardware, and heat issue, thanks for pointing that out folks. In fact, my opinion has done a complete 180..."

    --
    Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
  59. Thurrot does it too by Twid · · Score: 1

    Paul Thurrot used to be a lot worse, but he still drops the occasional Apple troll. Check out this story from today, for example. He mentions a nice article from the Apple support kbase on letterboxing and such, which clearly in the article is geared towards iMovie users, and then says "Coming next week from the iPod maker: Personal advice about dating."

    Yeah Paul, Apple has no products with anything to do with video playback or video content creation, right?

    To Paul's credit, he's come around a lot and rarely does stuff like this lately. When he does, though, it makes me scratch my head.

    --
    - "When you want something with all your heart, the entire universe conspires to give it to you" -Paulo Coelho
  60. Transcript of the video by InakaBoyJoe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's the transcript of the video. Note that the audio is out of sync on the BitTorrent version too.

    ---------
    (Dvorak): ... there's a formula for pissing off Macintosh users and getting a lot of links or attention. And this has been deconstructed, but never accurately. I'm going to give you the deconstruction.

    First, I write something that would be semi-innocuous, with just enough insulting stuff to get a lot of attention from the Macintosh community. So then they would write in -- and by the way, it would always be done in such a way that I had outs -- in other words, I would write in kind of a leisurely way. That would get me one column with a lot of numbers.

    Then I'd get a lot of hate mail, and all kinds of weird Macintosh reaction. And then, I would react to it as though I was flabbergasted that everybody misterpreted me, and that they hated it, and I don't get it, and what's wrong with these people ... which would piss them off even more.

    So I'd get like huge hits ...

    (Interviewer): So what was the point of all this?

    (Dvorak): Now wait a minute. For numbers!

    (Interviewer): Which numbers -- exactly, what numbers are you looking for?

    (Dvorak): I get them. Believe me. Lots of numbers.

    Now, then I let it simmer down for a while, and then whatever position I took originally, I would change the position exactly the opposite, and tell the Macintosh people I was completely wrong, and they were write all along, and the numbers would go through the ceiling!! Haha!

    1. Re:Transcript of the video by InakaBoyJoe · · Score: 1

      oops... write --> right in the last paragraph...

    2. Re:Transcript of the video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i think leisurely -> weaselly...

  61. The speed of news reporting on /. is amazing... by wkcole · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was only about 20 years ago that Z-D tasked Dvorak with trolling Mac users as the inside back cover columnist for the old MacUser, where he openly admitted to writing things to inflame Mac users enough that they'd have to buy the magazine just to have reference for their 10-page crayon screeds to the editors against him. And if ancient history and paper is too hard, he has said what he said to Winer oon at least a half-dozen TWiT podcasts over the past year. This is not news, it is Dvorak stating an obvious truth for the umpteenth time. He is apparently still getting a chuckle from the fact that some people who take everything too seriously (e.g. Dave Winer) still don't get the joke after having it explained to them repeatedly over decades. If Winer really thinks this is some great revelation of sin, he's got his head further inserted than ever.

    It is the job of anyone who writes for ad-supported media to attract eyeballs, and Dvorak has never been ashamed of doing that job. Being scandalized by his honesty says a lot more about the intelligence (or maybe integrity) of those who are scandalized than it says about Dvorak.

  62. And the Nobel price for egoism goes to... DVORAK!! by Lactoso · · Score: 3, Interesting
    My favorite part about this video is how even in his 'coming clean', he's really only correcting the people who have incorrectly 'deconstructed' his trolling methodology before.

    He mentions that in the first five seconds of the vid.

    If Dvorak was a serial killer, he'd be the one that's caught because he's just so damn proud of his body of work and smug enough to want to get caught so that he could explain to the great unwashed masses how brilliant he really is (not that it would help, because there's only so much the great unwashed can comprehend...).

  63. The real secret... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No matter what anybody or any company does, the end result is the same:

    I lose, you lose, we all lose (except big business). Somebody trolls, we complain, big business gets money. Who wins? Nobody (except big business).

  64. Re:ever-knowledgeable readers by gangien · · Score: 1

    this is the first reply i've seen that insults us the /. community as stupid? and it's labelled redudant! lol

    sorry i find that amsuing.

  65. Slashdot needs a Dvorak filter by Aqua+OS+X · · Score: 1

    Dvorak posts shit to get hits... and the more hits we give him, the more shit he's going to post.

    Why this site encourages him time and time again, I have no idea.

    --
    "Things are more moderner than before- bigger, and yet smaller- it's computers-- San Dimas High School football RULES!"
  66. have you seen the elevator? that could work! by johnpaul191 · · Score: 1

    it literally goes from street level down to the store (and back up) and that's it. in theory you really could have a single "GO!" button. it was still broken as of last saturday when i was there... not that i was going to ride it, but the staircase spirals around it so you can't miss it. it is a really nice looking design with the glass stairs and glass elevator under the glass cube. it had to suck for those students being trapped in a transparent fishtank. heh.

    as for the store itself, it is really nothing more than a larger version of your nearest Apple store. there is no theater or anything like the other NYC Apple store. they do have a crapload of computers out for people to play with (check email etc). i would expect a ton of the people that come in there do not actually own a Mac. they are either possible switchers, iPod owners, or people looking for free net access.

  67. Re:O RLY? by Eideewt · · Score: 1

    I think we generally stick to modding posts up for *being* funny, not just for trying.

  68. And in other news, Dvorak discovers meta-trolling. by porkchop_d_clown · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder how many hits his site will get as people visit just to complain about the movie?

  69. Confession of a Mac User by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With Apple selling out to x86 I feel like someone who's been proclaiming all this time that my balls are bigger when they're not. The only thing I have left to boost my ego with is my looks.

  70. Give him a category by jesterzog · · Score: 1

    All that we need is to convince the few editors that he is, in fact, a full-time troll, And that his rantings do not deserve a place on the front page because they are neither news, nor are they 'stuff that matters'.

    I just wish he'd be given his own category. That way I can block him from my personal front page in favour of more interesting stories, and those who want to be trolled can still be trolled. I'd settle for the slashdot editors deciding not to post his crap anymore, but I just don't think that's realistic. As sad as it is, Dvorak drives Slashdot activity as much as he drives his own pageviews.

  71. Re:Companies vs Their Products; The Nature of Flam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple's OS X v. Windows XP ads are hardly trolling. It is not trolling when a company compares their product line against their competitor's in a non-subjective way.

    The iLife suite of applications, like iPhoto, iTunes, iEtc, is far better integrated, reliable and functional than any of the lifestyle applications that Microsoft bundles with Windows. So again, the point that Apple is making is legitimate.

    IIRC, the ad comparing iLife to Windows' offerings compares the suite to Calculator and Clock, not Windows Media Player and Windows Picture and Fax Viewer. So it is trolling, whether you like it or not.

  72. magic slink-off powder by epine · · Score: 1
    In other words, she's an intellectual prostitute. Wonderful. I know a few people like that. And I'm convinced the world would be better off if they would just slink back to the primordial ooze they came from.


    Hey, does your magic slink-off powder also work on cockroaches and malaria-bearing mosquitoes? Empty-nesters, meet empty-nichers. What is the supreme emotional satisfaction you seem to derive from slapping the label prostitute on an entire class of survival strategy? I guess there was a karmic distortion in the cosmic primordial plasma, and like Gandalf, somehow we are tasked with dispatching the Balrog from the omininous, obscure depths of Middle Earth. Gandalf smacks staff on narrow stone arch: Slink off! You shall not pass! But seriously, what gave you so much evident pleasure in voicing those words? I'd like to gather together a group of fifty people and do a nice little MRI run to see what nerve cluster is activated when these sentiments are voiced. I would guess it's not that far from the witch-hunting locus: general discomfort with the entire spectrum of feminine wiles that burns incandescent on one or two unfortunates just far enough off toward the end of the spectrum to become vilified as the exemplar for the entire class. Yes, that's what it is: the sound of a diffuse, non-specific anger collapsing to a focal point with the matches in hand. Another karmic flaw in the cosmic soup, or a redeeming characteristic of human nature? I'm getting a little twitchy with this slick-off powder. My first impulse is to pour it on everything in sight. Hey look, a warning label: product contains nano-granulated magnesium, do not inhale, keep away from exposed flame. Perfect! What's a good slink-off without a match, white light, and smoke?
    1. Re:magic slink-off powder by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's one hell of a tangent you got there. It must be pretty strong for how far out you went on it.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    2. Re:magic slink-off powder by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      You do realize that the word prostitute does not denote a particular gender? Or were you just channeling Hunter Thompson there?

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  73. Re:Breaking News! You won't believe it! by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

    Agreed. For a fact to be scientifically acceptable, it must be tested and quantified. Relying on common knowledge doesn't advance knowledge, but testing it might.

  74. mod parent up please by stunt_penguin · · Score: 1

    Oh, man you made me laugh so hard- you made my idea complete _^^

    --
    When the posters fear their moderators, there is tyranny; when the moderators fears the posters, there is liberty.
  75. And your good taste and smarts! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apple's customers are like no others--a rich blend of the most sociologically elite with those seeking elegant, simple computing... Unlike users of Intel/Windows computers, a significant portion of Apple's users are active , exploratory , avant-garde and early adopters . The activities they enjoy are unique in the way that they more often incorporate rich media such as video and music as well as more active prosumer behavior than many more passive Windows [and Linux] users.

    -- MetaFacts, Inc.


    With above-average household income and education levels, the Mac population [is] very attractive [ intellectually as well as physically .]

    -- Nielsen/NetRatings (as quoted by C|NET)


  76. "THERE..." by msauve · · Score: 1

    really. That's all that's needed, isn't it? Doesn't that Apple store only have 2 levels? No matter which one you enter on, you want to go to the other, so a 1 button elevator is all that's needed.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  77. Re:Companies vs Their Products; The Nature of Flam by Drizzt+Do'Urden · · Score: 1

    Windows Picture? You mean the thing not released yet?

    Fax viewer? No equivalent in the iLife suit..

    True, they should have compared with WiMP and Windows Movie Maker, but there is still so much stuff missing!

  78. Gotta love the mods by Das+Auge · · Score: 1

    80% Insightful 10% Informative 10% Mac Users

  79. Re:Companies vs Their Products; The Nature of Flam by OnanTheBarbarian · · Score: 1

    No, you're not putting Dvorak in perspective. Dvorak voicing his opinion is like 'skinheads marching'? Come on, that's clearly understating the case. Dvorak voicing his opinion is like the Nuremberg rallies. Dvorak voicing his opinion is like those radio stations stirring up the Hutus to go massacre the Tutsis.

    There you go. Hope this helps.

  80. PC Mag and Integrity? by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

    PC Magazine? Integrity? Who are they kidding? PC Magazine lost all integrity years and years ago. Did something happen that they got a shred of it back?

    1. Re:PC Mag and Integrity? by steeviant · · Score: 1

      Yeah Dvorak told the truth for once.

  81. Parent not insightful by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1, Informative
    Hey there.

    If you could read you'd know that he's actually meta-quoting Josh Trevino of http://redstate.com/ via http://www.swordscrossed.org/?p=50. Here's what you didn't read to illuminate the situation:

    By far the most enlightening thing I have read on the blogosphere in the past two months came from Republican Operative and founder of RedState.com Joshua Trevino, on Armando's and Trevino's new blog Swords Crossed. In an incredibly instructive piece--and I encourage everyone to read the whole thing--Josh Trevino does us all the favor of introducing us to the Overton Window.

    Anyway, I know it's both faster and easier to just jump straight to the ad hominem rather than make any substantive argument. I don't fault you for it. Least resistance is the natural order.
    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
  82. Republican Trolls by Penguinoflight · · Score: 1

    As could be expected, the trolls you mention often stray from legitimate topics to something just to get people excited. Unfortunately there's now a lot of legitimate unrest caused by foreign policy (US dealings with Iraq and the rest of the middle east), illegal immigration, social security failure, NSA wiretapping... the list goes on.

    Most of the trolls are just complaining about how their government leaders are doing no better (if not worse) than a left-leaning government. It doesn't fit because a lot of the choices made in conflict to the public's interest don't have a clear benefit to the lawmakers. Either they are hopelessly led astray, or there is some other power behind the decay of the government of the US.

    This really doesn't take away any of the blame from the right-controlled government officials. I just wish that the left had a solid case for better things to come. In the absense of that assurance I will be voting for the libertarian party.

    --
    "And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the World"
    1 John 4:14
  83. Re:Companies vs Their Products; The Nature of Flam by Locus+Mote · · Score: 1
    IIRC, the ad comparing iLife to Windows' offerings compares the suite to Calculator and Clock, not Windows Media Player and Windows Picture and Fax Viewer. So it is trolling, whether you like it or not.

    I'll grant you that, although I would still put it in the category of advertising hyperbole in that they are trying to take it to an extreme to prove a point. (They really should've slammed WMP and all the other garbage that MS bundles though...) In reality Windows Media Player and Windows Picture and Fax Viewer are both singularly and collectively a joke compared to iLife apps.

  84. I am absolutely shocked ... by kitzilla · · Score: 1

    ... to see that hospitality rooms are obviously still in operation at professional conventions.

    --
    This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
  85. Bah... by sheldon · · Score: 1

    If Republicans hated Ann Coulter, they wouldn't buy her books. And if they didn't buy her books, she'd never get on television spouting her nonsense.

    Naw... Ann Coulter is representative of the mainstream of modern Republican thought.

    She's just stupid enough to say out loud, what all the Republicans are thinking.

    1. Re:Bah... by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      Actually, there was some controversy a while back about her sales numbers being inflated by mass purchases, mostly from rightwing mailing organisations that then gave them away. You know the sort, the "join now and we'll send you Ann Coulter's new bestseller for free!" offers.

      I have heard and read anecdotal evidence that her books actually have low turnover at brick-and-mortar bookstores. But anecdotal evidence isn't worth much.

      While I'm on the subject of anecdotal evidence, the few times I talk to registered Republican voters, I get the feeling that there is a huge disconnect between what voters think and what party leaders think. Party affiliation is based more upon tradition ("we've always voted Republican") and peer pressure than on any issues. I get this vibe from Democrat voters as well, but to a lesser degree.

      As for Dvorak and Coulter, they both have one thing in common: a strong desire for "strokes". Be it a caress or a slap, the main thing is that they get you to make contact with them. Everything they write is designed for their own benefit, and the topic is merely a vehicle for getting strokes. Actual discourse is not desired. I've had my fill of both, and refuse to grant them page clicks any more.

  86. Re:Breaking News! You won't believe it! by dangitman · · Score: 1
    Every once in a while you find out that something "everyone knows" isn't true after all [snopes.com],

    Such as the fact that snopes is often biased and inaccurate, even though many believe it to be gospel?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  87. So this is why... by chemindefer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Macs don't come with Dvorak keyboards.

  88. No, Two Better Words by new500 · · Score: 1

    Arthur Schopenhauer

    For a more concise and virtually definitive guide to trolling, see The Art Of Controversy

    Translated here: http://coolhaus.de/art-of-controversy/

    And though i can't find a date of publication for that work, it sure predates cable and the intardweb :

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Schopenhauer

    But this was a good troll. I just don't comprehend that some people couldn't tell from Dvorak's expression and voice he was just having a laugh.

    Or did they choose not to laugh along, so they could troll the idea this Dvorak is serious about this, and - implying he was ever serious and not just a fun and often insightful columnist, that he must therefore be a fraud? Reverse meta-trolling.

    Now, where was i . .

    Oh, well . . . :-)

  89. Re:Companies vs Their Products; The Nature of Flam by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Mac" is the brand name of a product line (of computers) made by Apple. Products do not troll.
    C'mon. You and everybody else knew what mfh meant. This isn't English class.

    Apple's OS X v. Windows XP ads are hardly trolling. It is not trolling when a company compares their product line against their competitor's in a non-subjective way.
    I would agree that it's hardly trolling (depending on one's definition of "trolling"), but to say Apple is comparing "Mac" to "PC" in a "non-subjective way" is laughable.

    When I pull up the terminal window and type 'uptime' my Mac will return a date figure which is in months (and for a while there in years + months!) I have owned a PC running Windows XP and this was never the case.
    In this case, you're comparing your Mac (hardware and software) to your Windows XP PC. Uptime depends on much more than just the OS. Bad hardware and drivers will kill the uptime of both OS X and WinXP. Running unpatched WinXP in administrator mode with the firewall turned off will also kill uptime. Sure, there are a lot more crappy PCs out there than crappy Macs (which do exist). But there are plenty of non-crappy PCs with Service Pack 2 that don't freeze or need to be rebooted regularly. I'm surprised yours isn't one of them.

    The iLife suite of applications, like iPhoto, iTunes, iEtc, is far better integrated, reliable and functional than any of the lifestyle applications that Microsoft bundles with Windows. So again, the point that Apple is making is legitimate.
    Not legitimate, IMO. iLife is not bundled with OS X, it is bundled with new Macs and costs $79 seperately. You compared a $79 suite to whatever is included with Windows, not whatever is bundled with a new PC. Some PC companies bundle comparable software with their new PCs or make it an option. You should compare iLife (which is not free) to software bundled with a new PC, not with whatever is free with Windows.

    Many PC makers bundle (or offer as a cheap option) Microsoft Works Suite, which includes Word 2002, Works (basic spreadsheet, database, calendar), Digital Image Standard (iPhoto), Encarta, Money, and Streets & Trips Essentials. Every PC sold with a DVD burner is bundled with DVD creation software (iDVD) and the vast majority are also bundled with movie-making software (iMovie). Whether or not the software bundled with a particular PC is comparable to iLife (or is better) depends on the PC.

    I think I agree with the rest of your comment. I just think the new Apple ads are almost as misleading as Bill O'Reilly or Michael Moore.

    --
    TO START
    PRESS ANY KEY

    Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

  90. good lesson by zpok · · Score: 1

    Good lesson in "objective reporting". The anglo-saxon tradition is: bring the news as objectively as possible. Deconstructed this means: don't tell people your own (boss') opinion, lead them to it by suggestion, and weighing and omitting facts in order to boost own viewpoint.

    Which imo is sick.

    Contrast with the subjective and unprofessional french tradition of being an opiniated bastard. State the facts and then tell your readers exactly what you think of it and why. Not only do you get the facts (omission or misdirection is not honorable) but man, can those french write!

    Of course, saying this on /. is an open invitation to french-bashing, so ladies and gentlemen, load your trolls!

    Cheers

    --
    I think, therefore I am...I think.
  91. Speed isn't everything by MROD · · Score: 1

    I've just bought an Apple refurbished iBook G4 12" (1.3GHz) in preference to the new Macbook. I had the following reasons:

    (1) I hate the current crop of glossy screens. When you are in a location with multiple bright light sources close to eye level it's very difficult to use the screen.
    (2) I'm not keen on the "Casio calculator" keyboard.
    (3) The iBook's smaller, has a slightly better battery life and runs cooler.
    (4) I don't need processor speed for what I want to do with the machine.
    (5) I don't trust first generation Apple machines. :-)
    (6) They are more expensive.

    At least in the laptop/notebook arena, speed isn't everything.

    --

    Agrajag: "Oh no, not again!"
  92. The first and last post to this should be... by Hercules+Peanut · · Score: 1

    Duh!

    Now I really don't understand why CowboyNeal didn't post my submission about scientists suspecting that the Sun will rise in the east again tomorrow.

  93. mod parent up by mfh · · Score: 1

    This is one of the best Zen comments I've read on Slashdot, in a long time. There is too much internet clutter and the bottom line is that you can look at each piece of a forest if you want -- each specific twig and rock -- and you can spend your life classifying them all and arguing about the relevance of each item, or you can simply sit under a tree and eat a fig.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  94. Re:Companies vs Their Products; The Nature of Flam by Locus+Mote · · Score: 1
    C'mon. You and everybody else knew what mfh meant. This isn't English class.

    Are classes something we take just to say we passed? Get the grade and forget everything you learned? It is an attitude prevalent in American schools and it is one of the reasons the world is kicking our butts economically speaking. To give one example among countless others, the Indians I have worked with in the United States and for whom English is a second language speak it more fluently than the majority of the Americans I know. (And most of the Americans I know have at least a Bachelors degree.) If your thoughts are inarticulate it follows that the words you use to express them will be as well. If your worlds are inarticulate, it most likely reflects a sloppiness in your thinking.

    In this case, you're comparing your Mac (hardware and software) to your Windows XP PC. Uptime depends on much more than just the OS. Bad hardware and drivers will kill the uptime of both OS X and WinXP. Running unpatched WinXP in administrator mode with the firewall turned off will also kill uptime. Sure, there are a lot more crappy PCs out there than crappy Macs (which do exist). But there are plenty of non-crappy PCs with Service Pack 2 that don't freeze or need to be rebooted regularly. I'm surprised yours isn't one of them.

    My PC was running Service Pack 2, it did have the firewall turned on, and it was still garbage. This had to do with the rate of memory fragmentation and other factors during the day to day running of the OS. (I tend to be they type of user which has 15+ applications open at any given time. This is not unreasonable to expect of an OS. My Mac manages all the time.) Actually, I could argue that it was Windows inability to properly manage its running assets which was at issue. The same hardware ran BSD and Linux just fine.

  95. HOLY CRAP!!!! by frankinla · · Score: 1

    ...here's another shocker: Fox News isn't fair and balanced!!! they takes side and stack the news!!!! OMG!!! Wow, this still goes on. I haven't bought a Mac in 7 years, partly because I thought the Mac heads where crazy. They would always fall for this Dvorak crap as if he poked a stick in thier eye and say the stupidest. I honestly believe that if The Wizards of Infinate Loop told them they had to thin the Mac heard and every Mac owner who's last name begins with C had to off themselves, there would be a night of sobbing and goodbys followed by a morning of carnage (relatively speaking 300x10^6 * .5 * .04 * 1/26 = 231x10^3 corpses). Don't get me wrong, I loved the Mac. The operating system was and is the best out there. But the market place of ideas (like, what do you do with that great OS?) left it behind, and it still hasn't caught up. iTunes and the IPTV revolution following in behind it is thier strongest hand right now. If they would just free-up the OS from the WAY OVERPRICED niche boxes they would take off like a rocket.

  96. Voice-overs! by maxx_730 · · Score: 1

    Think of all the great voice-overs that could come of this movie! I, for one am waiting.

  97. Re:Breaking News! You won't believe it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Got any examples?

  98. Here is a Mac troll: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Steve Jobs is less than godlike, and Apple is not the perfect company of all time.

  99. Re:ever-knowledgeable readers by larske · · Score: 1

    I understand that you felt you were the target of that post, but let me correct your spelling error:
    sorry i find that I am suing.
    And suing is as usual the best solution to insults ;-).

  100. Trolling Mac Lusers == No Challenge by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

    Mac people are easy targets for trolling. They've been sucked in to paying a premium for a below average machine. They gleefully pay for style over substance, then feel the overwhelming need to try and convince others that it is foolishness to do otherwise, apparently to justify their folly to themselves. I don't get it, but sometimes they can be amusing when they're all riled up and hissy.

    --
    by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  101. Trolling Windows Lusers == No Challenge by argent · · Score: 1

    Windows users are easy targets for trolling. They've been sucked in to putting up with the most outrageous problems for the sake of saving a few dollars on an overpowered computer, then feel the overwhelming need to try and convince themselves that they don't really care about Windows annoyances and disasters, apparently to justify their purchase of a fancy videogame console. I don't get it, but sometimes they can be amusing when they're trying to be dry and ironic.

    1. Re:Trolling Windows Lusers == No Challenge by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      You've crystalized my point. Even when I state "I'm trolling Mac Users, it's easy" I catch some sap that can't stand to let things lay. No challenge.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  102. Who are you calling "a Mac user"? by argent · · Score: 1

    I've been using BSD since before Finder 0.9 was a glint in Jef Raskin's eye. Mac OS before OS X (before Jaguar, really) was exactly the kind of joke you're trying to make it. Today it's a decent desktop OS, and better than Windows as a server, but only because it's fired the creaky old 1960-quality OS that was holding it back. What's there now is no more "Mac OS" than Linux or FreeBSD are. Pity Microsoft can't bring themselves to bury the horrorshow of misdirected grad theses in the NT kernel and the crippled Win32 subsystem and start over from scratch.

    1. Re:Who are you calling "a Mac user"? by Babbster · · Score: 1

      He was trolling and he said it twice! Good God, man! If a tree falls in the forest and you're there to hear it, do you stand under it?

  103. China and fascism by Burz · · Score: 1

    I think China has acquired the 'capital' incentives of fascism, but doesn't qualify in other areas.

    It is a country trying to move away from violence at many levels of its society: There is no coordinated fascist agitprop campaign against communists or unions, nor any particular affinity for recruiting violent gangs. Women are still a part of the governing and business cultures, and homosexuality has been decriminalized. And there is no large movement toward incarceration (as there is in the United States).

    China could be heading toward incipient fascism, but my money is on them heading in a better direction. The big questions are whether they can keep seperatists from fragmenting the country, and whether democracy will play a role in their future.

    1. Re:China and fascism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I don't see China moving from violence, as they still enforce their laws with neighborhood cops who kill people, all the way up to capital punishment for, say, bootleggers. And they keep people in line with the threat of violence outside the legal system, in the political system instead. Their fascism has coopted real "communists" into harmless pets among their fake "Communist" propaganda.

      They are very much "national socialists". They succeeded in their purges during their "Great Leap Forward" and "Cultural Revolution". Sexism and homophobia aren't fascist, though they are used by fascists to target weak groups for propaganda and militarizing the remainder. China targets weak (weaker than the government) groups that actually represent a threat to fascist power, like the Falun Gong and Muslim theocrats, real and "imagined", to the same effect.

      China has been through generations of unrestrained fascism. They are moving towards the purer form, with less of a balance between government corporations and corporate government. A lot of their means to the fascist end have run their course as they've become more fascist from merely authoritarian, so they've retired the cattlecars and roving streetgangs enforcing ideology. But they're a corporate government, communicating with the people only through violence and propaganda: fascist.

      I don't think they can stay that way. I think that their economic and tech development has produced decentralized forces of demand, expectation and interconnectedness that mere violence and propaganda can't control. Mainly the vulnerability of the "official truth" to distributed media spells the end of their current model. I expect they will see fragmentation from "separatists", which serves the more developed provinces who want to keep more of the money while exploiting the resources (including labor and dumps) of the less developed provinces. Some kind of feedback through the government to the people will develop, though the sinking degree of democracy in the US as an example and partner bodes ill for real "democracy" in China.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    2. Re:China and fascism by Burz · · Score: 1

      Your points are well-taken, especially the concise definition "corporate government, communicating with the people only through violence and propaganda: fascist."

      However, I may be overly stuck on the early European concept, but I'd still expect some visible manifestation (in the form of propaganda) of national romanticism casting the populace as exceptional 'supermen' or sorts. U.S.ers have this in the current global version of manifest destiny. It is anti-humanism which I thought was an essential ingredient of fascism.

  104. OMG! by solistus · · Score: 1

    What an outrage! Someone post a link to one of his articles so we can all leave scathing comments about this!