Slashdot Mirror


Dell Quietly Leaves MP3 Market

An AD-Esque Sitcom writes "Dell has quietly retired from the portable player market. The Dell DJ Ditty — whose website is nothing more than an error now — was absent from Dell's catalogue, and the company was not offering any follow-up products, instead preferring to stick with PCs, printers, and not killing people in fiery laptop-related explosions. Dell will still be a third-party reseller of other MP3 players like the Creative Zen, but has left the Windows-based player market to the four big players — SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative."

166 comments

  1. A Lesson for Late Comers? by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back in the day there was a phrase going around, which seemed to have great merit: Stick to your core competency. While not always good advice, for there were a few companies who diversified and prospered, it was often easy to find examples of where companies had utterly done themselves in by getting into product lines and services where they were out of their depth or the product/service really wasn't ever going to produce the return hoped for (during hard times these units are often the first closed because the accountants can readliy point them out as hemorraging cash.) Good for Dell, get out and put your mind on sorting out your battery woes and making better PC's (the past years models are a far cry from the quality of early Dell units.)

    Microsoft, still willing to bet billions you have an iPod killer and wish to enter the digital music player market? of course, you love the challenge and it encourages those mean old euro dogs to request Windows with the media junk bundled the EU is currently spanking you for.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Stick to your core competency"

      Yeah, I wish Apple would have listened to you before they started selling iPods :-)

    2. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by vivek7006 · · Score: 1

      Stick to your core competency

      What if apple had followed your advice? We would have never seen an ipod. As the old saying goes, its better to try and fail rather than not try at all.

    3. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by bangenge · · Score: 3, Interesting

      apple would have loved to have stuck to their core competency, but they gambled. but they had a good (and you might even say great) marketing strategy, a good (again, conservative estimate) product and a market still not really saturated at that time. i have to admit, although you might say luck had to do a lot with the ipod's success, they did what they could to eliminate the need to rely on luck. dell apparently realized that they can't compete with the 50000000lb gorilla in there with the other known consumer electronic brands (sony, panasonic, creative) already having a tough time themselves. coincidentally, i was "watching" tv the other night (i'm in japan right now and i don't understand japanese that much), and i saw a chart that *probably* says that apple has about 50% share of the MP3 player market, with sony at 20% (i hope someone can check me on this one). if sony can't get a bigger share HERE in japan, why should dell have it? as much a lot of companies want to come out with an ipod-killer, they really can't do much about it.

      --
      . o O ( TwO hEaDs ArE mOrE tHaN oNe... )
    4. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back in the day there was a phrase going around, which seemed to have great merit: Stick to your core competency.

      You mean the way Apple stuck to its core competency as a computer hardware/OS supplier, and not a music distributor, or developer of portable music devices?

      That phrase should be ammended to "stick to your competencies". Consumers don't care whether or not this new service is "core", as long as the company does a good job with it. See also Microsoft's foray into hardware, with keyboards, mice and X-boxes, often praised by people who don't particularly like their software.

      In general, companies who don't diversify die. Once they fill their original product's niche, and get the attention of all their target market, there is no way to grow except diversification. And if a company isn't growing, it's dying. That's particularly true of companies with a retail model; once you've sold your product to everyone who wants one, the only sales you're going to get are for replacements. That volume of sale won't be able to support the sort infrastructure you had when you were growing, so your company wil have to downsize. As you downsize, your ability to produce and sell your product likewise decreases, and you start the slow (or more often, very fast) spiral into obscurity.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    5. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by FoxconnGuy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Apple has sticked to its core competency: Design fantastic products and marketing them. Though not always work, but for a consumer electronic product, Apple has good chance to win the fancy high-end ones. Especially with new business model been built. Apple joined the player market with iTunes supporting its iPod products. While back then if you tell someone to sell MP3 in this way, he/she mostly would thought you're out of your mind: RIAA will not allow that! Dell is good at: cost down and stream line the manufacturing all the way to service. With a PC or laptop, the price has been the critical factor you consider when you buy one (for most of us). That's one of the domains their core competency has effect on. I think designing fancy new stuff and dealing with the media industry shall not be their expertise (although they are supposed to be good at talking over phone.) You know what? I think Steve Jobs will not be Steve Jobs in Dell. Another example is dual version PC from Apple. Apple is selling their PC MAC in a new way. And by the time people found a dual-boot PC can work, you'll see *maybe* Dell selling PC that can dual-booting Linux and Windows with a very good price .

    6. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by tkdog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except I think Apple would take the view that they did stick to their core competency - making hardware and software blend into a useful appliance. The iPod has less of a range of functions than the things they typically make (Macs) but I think they see it as a "post-PC" gadget. A device that fits in your hand (or pocket) and allows you to do stuff - listen to music, watch video, carry files, some light PDA stuff so far. But there is a potential for them to build from what they have. The idea that all Apple is interested in is personal computers I don't think is valid. They were limited to that by a combination of available technology, money issues and inertia but I wouldn't be surprised if they released additional non-Mac "appliances", and considered them to be core products.

    7. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by 70Bang · · Score: 2, Informative


      I agree, but there's a hairball working to choke that off a bit. ;)

      It's called dividends and keeping the stockholders happy

      The Rule of 72 [1] means every three years will require an annual growth of 24%. That's hard to do year-in and year-out. To make the cut, you either increase sales at a frisky pace, increase the number of products people can buy, or buy someone else.

      The responses to maintain whatever magic numbers are expected are obvious, finite, and generate a lot of pain. Those who are in pain are very good at showing people sh5t flows downhill. And the various levels of management who normally do one of their most important tasks, acting as a buffer have to put that aside.

      I've been through it a couple of times.

      The simplest example was in the computer book publishing world, where the executives wore gold handcuffs, which is the general method of motivation throughout the business world. Word was given to the parent company [that] the next year's sales would increase 20%. Word within the division (holding the imprints) was an increase of 30% would be required. If anything over 20% occurred, the divisional prez made his bosses happy. The internal 20% was a different story: it affected those who answered to him. The only problem at the CEO/Publisher level was: the number of titles published within each imprint couldn't change.

      Cook the books? {snicker} Books were "pulled up a month" (either monthly, quarterly, or annually): if they were scheduled for early to mid September, an order to find ways to cut corners and get it into the August schedule was made. Scheduled for mid to late October? They'd find a way to pull it into September in order to make monthly and quarterly numbers. (Fun?) What happened if Borland or Microsoft didn't ship their software on schedule or made some changes, albeit minor, between their final build and the gold disk? It took some time before I could convince them to make their "Ship To Publisher" date the same as software's "Gold to Manufacturer" and there wouldn't be as much jumping around.
      ________________________

      [1] Doubling occurs when ( 72 == years * percentage)

    8. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My God, you really have abandoned all pretense at being anything other than an Apple shill.

    9. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by Steve001 · · Score: 1

      vivek7006 wrote and included with a post:

      Stick to your core competency

      What if apple had followed your advice? We would have never seen an ipod. As the old saying goes, its better to try and fail rather than not try at all.

      I think a way to look at is that you can move away from your core competency, but you are taking a greater risk of failure. But I don't view the iPod as a move away from their core business. When you strip it down to the basics, the iPod is simply a small, limited-use computer, well designed for a specific task. Much like a PDA, which is good for tasks it is designed for.

      In the same way, just because a new product is an extension of your core competency does not mean you will succeed. Since it is part of their business, Sony should have been able to make a successful high-capacity compressed audio player that can compete with the iPod, yet they have struggled to do so.

      At this point it will be difficult for any company to compete with the iPod because of what has already been established for it. It is not just the player itself, but it is also the established infrastructure (cases and accessories among them) that a new player will need. You can easily purchase items to make the iPod much more usable for yourself.

    10. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      I would argue that the iPod IS Apple's core competency:

      The iPod originally was:
      160x160 grayscale screen
      32mb RAM
      5gb HDD
      dual core 90MHz CPU
      Five buttons and a touchpad
      Fast serial bus
      Stereo speaker out

      That's a computer if I ever heard one. On top of that they designed two pieces of software to integrate with it: iTunes and the iPod OS, also both strong competencies of Apple.

      So with the original iPod they designed a portable computer, an OS, and an application. Things that Apple is very skilled at.

      Later when they branched off to music, what they were REALLY selling was a database application, another of their core competencies, what with their experience with WebObjects, FileMaker, iTunes, and OS X. The distribution mechanism probably drew very heavily from their existing Akamai/Quicktime Movie Trailer connection, and the database population was probably very similar to how iTunes works, except in much heavier volumes and higher quality sources.

      Apple diversified intelligently. They did something really well, and then decided to grow the market for that something. If they continued to diversify in the same manner, expect them to release HDD based camcorders/cameras, or HDD based car stereos, or HDD based home theater boxes. Essentially anything that can be done with a computer, an OS, and an application.

      Microsoft, with the XBox and Zune, aren't sticking to core competencies. What is Microsoft's core competency?

      OS bundling. Perhaps if they had partnered with Nintendo to design a killer web browser and OS for the DS and Wii, they would have done a lot better... they don't manufacture PCs, they don't design PCs, they don't distribute PCs...

    11. Re:A Lesson for Late Comers? by jaimegarcia · · Score: 1

      Stick to your core competency Tell Sony about this ;)

  2. Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Atleast they didnt leave explosively. You gotta give them credit for that much.

    1. Re:Hey by soupforare · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, they have a tendancy to simply stop working. Which is worse; at least with firey death you get a light show and possibly a million dollar lawsuit.

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
  3. Snakes on an MP3 Player by Kelson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess Dell couldn't make use of all that Snakes on a Plane tie-in publicity, huh?

    What, you didn't notice it? Small wonder, considering the character listening to the Dell MP3 player was known as iPod Girl until the last minute.

  4. Explosions! by MarkByers · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "and not killing people in fiery laptop-related explosions."

    Nothing like a bit of flamebait to start some lively discussions!

    Do we really need these sorts of comments in the summaries?

    --
    I'll probably be modded down for this...
    1. Re:Explosions! by w33t · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course we need these sorts of comments in the summaries! You vacuous, ill-educated buffoon! ...and when you say "flamebait", are you reffering to the comment or the laptop battery?

    2. Re:Explosions! by An+AD-Esque+Sitcom · · Score: 1

      Flamebait? Come on now -- it was, in fact, a cute little joke, ignore/laugh at your own risk.

    3. Re:Explosions! by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      What's funny is when the mainstream media picks up comments like that and presents 'em as fact.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    4. Re:Explosions! by geekoid · · Score: 0, Redundant

      1) it was a funny.
      2) it was not flaimbait.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Explosions! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Do we really need these sorts of comments in the summaries?

      No kidding! I have a Dell laptop right here, and I've never had a singl....AHHHHHHHH!!!

      SEARING HEAT!!!

      FLAMES!!!!!!! CHEMICAL SMELL!!! THE HEAT.. IT BURNS!! Good god HELP ME!!!! MY GENITALS ARE ON FIRE! They are reduced to USELESS CINDERS!!

      Oh god now my laptop has LEPT INTO THE AIR WITH EXPLOSIVE FORCE! Flaming SPARKS are RAINING on my HIGHLY FLAMMABLE HAIR! Same has now erupted into flames! AHHH!!!!!!!! The pain is UNBEARABLE!

      My EYES!!! Filled with BURNING LITHIUM!!! OH GOD WHY, WHY!

      ARGHGHH!!!!!!!! The laptop has completed it's ascent and subsequent DESCENT.. now it CRASHED ON MY HEAD!! PAIN!!! The FLAMING SHARDS are now propelled HORIZONTALLY!!!

      NOOOOOO!!!! NOT MY FIREWORKS COLLECTION!!! NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!!! I should've listened to my DEAR MOTHER and not stored them under my work desk. I SHAKE MY FIST AT MY MOTHER!!! CURSING her for bringing me into this world, only to MEET WITH A FLAMING LITHIUM DEATH!!! MY FIST THEN SHAKES AT MICHAEL DELL, the bringer of HELLFIRE!

      My charred body, lying prone on the ground, PRAYING that the SWEET RELEASE of DEATH will deliver me from TORMENT!!! YOUR RECALL IS USELESS TO A CORPSE.

    6. Re:Explosions! by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      Wait...how the hell did you type that last bit when you were dead? ...freaky...

    7. Re:Explosions! by Judge_Fire · · Score: 1

      "Wait...how the hell did you type that last bit when you were dead?"

      That, and not only that hints at Vista's speech recognition being used here.

  5. Now they've lost so many opportunities... by w33t · · Score: 4, Funny

    to kill people in fiery MP3-player-related explosions.

    1. Re:Now they've lost so many opportunities... by RuBLed · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...they still have the opportunity to kill people in fiery printer-related explosions, at least that one would be a little more colorful.

  6. HA! by bacterial_pus · · Score: 1

    What were they expecting with a name like this!

    1. Re:HA! by bacterial_pus · · Score: 2, Funny

      Quick! What rhymes with Ditty?

    2. Re:HA! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Pretty.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:HA! by generic-man · · Score: 1
      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:HA! by kabz · · Score: 1

      It could have been worse ... It could have been called the "Dell Pinto"

      I can't imagine that FORD would still call copyright infringement. Let burning cars lie and all that.

      --
      -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
    5. Re:HA! by HotBlackDessiato · · Score: 1

      pity, zitty....for starters. oh shitty, I forgot titty.

      --
      "If you don't have eyes you shouldn't have wings" -- Carl Pilkington
  7. They entered even more quietly. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd never even HEARD of the "DJ Ditty" until this morning's radio news mentioned that Dell had dropped it.

    With PR like that - versus Apple's dancing silhouettes - it's no surprise it never sold.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:They entered even more quietly. by StarkRG · · Score: 1

      My first thought was "They were part of it?"

    2. Re:They entered even more quietly. by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that the Dell DJ Ditty sounds rather immature/stupid. Reminds me of P. Diddy. What the hell was he thinking?!?

    3. Re:They entered even more quietly. by SeaFox · · Score: 1
      I'd never even HEARD of the "DJ Ditty" until this morning's radio news mentioned that Dell had dropped it.

      With PR like that - versus Apple's dancing silhouettes - it's no surprise it never sold.

      Yeah, it's been said "teasers" and other marketting gimmicks that build mystery and suspense around your product are good PR tools. Apple kept the dancer's true identities a mystery, and I guess Dell just had too much of a good thing. A product so quietly promoted, your customers don't even know it exists!
    4. Re:They entered even more quietly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe mystery used to be a good thing, but now mystery = boredom. If I still don't know wtf you're talking about in 1/3rd of the time you're going to be talking to me, then I will simply lose attention. If you make me work to figure out wtf you're supposed to be telling me, I don't give a shit, I just tune out.

  8. I think it's a good move for Dell by raitchison · · Score: 1

    IMO their overdiversification is a major reason (but not the only one) for their recent decline, they definitely need to consolidate back to their core buisiness (PCs) and dump all the other crap (Printers, Networking gear, televisions, etc.)

    1. Re:I think it's a good move for Dell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no margin...

  9. microsoft.. why else? by User+956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ell will still be a third-party reseller of other MP3 players like the Creative Zen, but has left the Windows-based player market to the four big players -- SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative. Of course they bailed on the market. Microsoft is about to enter it and drop a shitload of cash in an attempt to gain marketshare, just like they did with xbox. The most likely scenario is that they're going to initially cannibalize non-ipod sales.

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:microsoft.. why else? by samkass · · Score: 1

      Dell will still be a third-party reseller of other MP3 players like the Creative Zen, but has left the Windows-based player market to the four big players -- SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative."

      "Windows-based player market"? What does that even mean? SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative together have 1/7th of the market, with 6/7ths being iPods. And most iPods are used with Windows. And how can Sony, with, what, a 2% market share, count as a "big player"?

      Do you mean Microsoft "Plays For Sure"-based, perhaps?

      --
      E pluribus unum
    2. Re:microsoft.. why else? by bealzabobs_youruncle · · Score: 1

      With the popularity of iTunes I doubt they will grab much of the iPods marketshare, but I feel sorry for Creative, Sandisk.etc... The confusion and inconsistent interfaces/policies/available artist in the "Plays for Sure" camp won't help anyone but MS, who will rally behind one player/storefront and make them the focus of their promotional efforts (and featured in Media Player's front page, and linked off of MSN, etc...). But you are right, they will attempt to employ the same methods they did with the Xbox, but by comparison (technology wise, design wise) they have a lot of catching up to do this time.

    3. Re:microsoft.. why else? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative together have 1/7th of the market, with 6/7ths being iPods.

      It does? You might want to tell Apple. They seem to be under the impression that they hold slightly less than 3/4 of the US market, with similar in Europe, but substantially less in Asia (you know, where Samsung and Sony hail?).

    4. Re:microsoft.. why else? by samkass · · Score: 1



              SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative together have 1/7th of the market, with 6/7ths being iPods.

      It does? You might want to tell Apple. They seem to be under the impression that they hold slightly less than 3/4 of the US market, with similar in Europe, but substantially less in Asia (you know, where Samsung and Sony hail?).


      Okay... even given 75% for Apple and 25% for the rest of the companies on the planet combined, with Sony still something like 2%, how does that substantially change my point? There's no such thing as "Windows-based MP3 players", most iPods are used with Windows, and Apple is the *only* "big" player in the MP3 market, so to come up with some sort of metric by which they're not "one of" the "big" ones is just silly. Dell ceeded the market to Apple, period.

      --
      E pluribus unum
  10. not for me by cptgrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...but has left the Windows-based player market to the four big players -- SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative.

    iriver for life

    Unless the next model I want to buy sucks, of course.

    --
    Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
    1. Re:not for me by humble.fool · · Score: 1

      That's some serious brand loyalty right there, folks.

      --
      Being anonymous is not cowardice.
    2. Re:not for me by eddy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Both iriver and my personal current favourite iaudio produce very good players, it's just that the masses waggle along and buy shit like ''Sony'' (because of brand) or ''Noname'' (because of price)

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
    3. Re:not for me by OpenGLFan · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say this...I use mp3 players constantly. I started with a Korean player with an 8 segment display I got off lik-sang years and years ago, the first disc-based hardware mp3 player.

      Anyway, I've always been a fan of iRiver. I bought a ChromeX, then a SlimX, then a H320. All were excellent and are still running. BUT a few months ago I bought an iRiver T-series flash player. I had to flash the firmware with a hacked Korean version to use it in Linux and treat it as a USB drive. Then, a few days later, the back came off when I was running. (Possibly my fault, I might not have put it in firmly enough, so I'll give them the benefit of the doubt.) Then yesterday the thing started going crazy, thinking that "hold" was on when it was not, then powering off immediately after powering up.

      Today I'm switching back to my solid-as-a-tank H320 for the gym, but for the upcoming Austin Distance Challenge races, I'm hoping to get the SanDisk player mentioned yesterday. The T-series is indeed the dud you're referring to.

    4. Re:not for me by cptgrudge · · Score: 1

      That makes me sad. I've had an iRiver H120 for years. It's survived a freeway wreck with me, gotten rained on, and generally been through a lot with me, yet still plays like a champ. My sister got an H320 (solid indeed) and has been happy with it as well.

      I wonder if iRiver has taken a hint yet from the fact that there's a healthy aftermarket for mods and replacement parts for the H1xx and H3xx. (Maybe there is for other players too, I don't know.) I hope to get a 40GB or 60GB drive and a new battery for my H120 soon. Since the H120 is a one platter model, I've had to wait for drive densities to increase in consumer available 2.5" drives. I may just have to keep retrofitting my current player if iRiver quality has gone down. Might have to pick up another H120 as well, just for the future.

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  11. Zero margin product by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Except for Apple, which uses it's excellent marketing to convince people that they need to wait in lines for hours to pay waaaay too much for their particular brand name, I can't believe that portable MP3 players are going to be cash cows for much longer. They're cheap, basic, simple electronic commodities at this point. Upload MP3's to them, press play, you have music. No big deal. Hell, Verisign just sent me a free one for downloading a 2 page white paper!

    The excitement is already dying down.

    1. Re:Zero margin product by geekoid · · Score: 1

      what? who waits in line for hours? except for christmas, of course.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Zero margin product by badasscat · · Score: 1

      I can't believe that portable MP3 players are going to be cash cows for much longer. They're cheap, basic, simple electronic commodities at this point. Upload MP3's to them, press play, you have music. No big deal.

      Not exactly the type of comment I'd expect to see in relation to a story about Dell exiting the mp3 player market.

      If your argument is that mp3 players are commodities at this point, you've been proven wrong by the very story you're writing about.

    3. Re:Zero margin product by Mikey-San · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're cheap, basic, simple electronic commodities at this point.

      And this mindset, ladies and gentlemen, is why no one has been able to beat the iPod.

      --
      Mikey-San
      Karma: +Eleventy billion (mostly affected by watching Celebrity Jeopardy)
  12. Whose website is nothing more than an error now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, they still make the player.

    The website is down until they get some replacement batteries for the server.

    1. Re:Whose website is nothing more than an error now by benplaut · · Score: 1

      Well, now we know that dell.com is hosted on a Dell laptop. This explains the horrific speed and 'misplaced' pages...

  13. Dell is cutting its losses, perhaps by Parallax+Blue · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the wake of their battery recall and complaints about bad tech support (no surprise there) they are likely cutting their losses and allocating the capital spent on this player to other areas such as better advertising, and (hopefully) better tech support. A smart move on their part as it's too late to make a significant impact on this market now IMHO.

    As for going quietly/gently, that is probably the right way to do it as share holders are scrutinizing their Dell stock and wondering whether or not they should be selling it. News that Dell has dropped their MP3 player, while certainly not a tragedy, may indicate either a weakness or a willingness to cut loose products that just aren't taking off. In effect they're playing it safe.

    1. Re:Dell is cutting its losses, perhaps by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Sony is going to be paying for the batteries, dell's financials took only a very small hit. I do admit I have a ditty, I won it in their christmas game with the lezbo delf chick ;)

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:Dell is cutting its losses, perhaps by smilindog2000 · · Score: 1

      Dell tech support... the best example I know of where stupid US based management fired a highly experienced and skilled team and replaced them with a bunch of cheaper morons from abroad. I'm all in favor of H1-Bs, and understand that some jobs are leaving, but not my skilled support!

      I'm the CTO of a very small company, but this is the third company I've encouraged to standardize on Dell. I know Dell makes lots on it's warranties, since their machines rarely go bad (not many actually explode), but I can't buy them any more. Neither my company, nor any I can influence will buy Dell machines with extended warranties in the future. The support is just too useless. It's now simply better to throw the machine away, rather than make that first support call.

      --
      Beer is proof that God loves us, and wants us to be happy.
  14. Haha by TimmyDee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Farewell Dell! One market you can't take over by undercutting on price!

    Don't let the door hit you on the ass!

    P.S. I know I may be modded troll for this one, but its about time this happened. Maybe all of those "analysts" will stop spewing about "iPod-killers" whenever someone comes out with a cheaper mp3 player. They may be driven by price alone, but consumers aren't always (as we have seen here).

    --
    Per Square Mile, a blog about density
    1. Re:Haha by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      I know. Hey - why are people buying 100-dollar plus Nike's when there's cheaper shoes? Why pay for designer jeans when they're cheaper at K-Mart.

      Tech doesn't have to be about parts - sometimes good design, like fashion - makes it's own desire (and price points).

      But what do I know. I'm sure even my el-cheapo Mac Mini would be PWNED by some Dell rebate fan.
      Doesn't mean it isn't the coolest lump of plastic I've ever owned though. Fuck they're just - so - COOL.

      I want a rack of em' Beowolf BITCHES! With GRILLS!

  15. windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    left the Windows-based player market to the four big players -- SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative."

    iPod works with Windows as well.

    1. Re:windows by lolocaust · · Score: 1

      I think that it meant to say "windows media-based". At least that's how I read it late last night.

      --
      Why does my post history abruptly stop? I want to laugh at the stupid things I posted as a kid.
  16. What happened to Apple? by Blastrogath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "...left the Windows-based player market to the four big players -- SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative."

    What happened to Apple? My iPod certainly works with Windows.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
    1. Re:What happened to Apple? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      What happened to Apple? My iPod certainly works with Windows.

      I think Dell is still mad at Apple. If I recall correctly they used to sell iPods on the Dell store and pre-install iTunes on their boxes, but after about a year the deal went south. I've heard this was because Apple was not willing to make guarantees about unsold inventory and I've heard this was because MS was pressuring them to remove the iTunes pre-install. I don't know the real truth. Anyway, even without their own iPod competitor I doubt they will make another deal with Apple to sell them anytime soon.

  17. Huh-what? by rjoseph · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "...has left the Windows-based player market to the four big players -- SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative."

    So, let's do some math here. Apple currently has, according to the most recent reports, about a 75% market share in the portable music player market. If Apple has sold 50+ million iPods to date, that would give us a rough estimate of about 67 million portable music players sold, in total, from all companies who produce said products. 50M iPods, 17M "others."

    Last quarter, Apple sold a little over 1M Mac computers, while it sold over 8M iPods. This is not a new trend, either: there are far less Mac owners than there are iPod owners in the world.

    So, you're really trying to convince us that out of the 50M iPods that have been sold, there are more people who bought one of the 17M other players that use Windows than there are iPod users who use Windows?!

    Did everyone already forget how a big a boon iTunes for Windows was for both Apple and iPod sales?

    1. Re:Huh-what? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 1

      I think what they meant was WMA/MS DRM (aka PlayForSure) based players. iPods can't play WMA or DRM'd WMA, such as those files you download from services like Napster and Yahoo Music Unlimited. The comment was poorly worded, I grant you.

      --
      The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    2. Re:Huh-what? by rjoseph · · Score: 1

      Ah, very true, that thought hadn't even crossed my mind: kudos for catching the important distinction that I missed!

    3. Re:Huh-what? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It might have been shorthand for Windows "Plays-For-Sure" player market.

  18. Typical of Dell by vandelais · · Score: 1

    to treat an MP3 player as just a commodity.

    They see their competition as the 4 other electronics makers, not Apple. That's too many competitors at the manufacturing level to have any real margin.
    They will just wait for the inevitable shakeout to happen to the other manufacturers and start their own back up again to regain pricing power leverage after the carnage is over.

    Apple gets it, however, by making a great product with superior design and clever marketing.

    --
    Game: Player 'Donald J Trump' now has AI skill level 'experimental'.
  19. There will be an iPod killer by CubicleView · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Companies that don't ever diversify don't always do well either. Dell's foray into the MP3 market turned out to be ill conceived, but as the great Homer put it "No matter how good you are at something, there's always about a million people better than you." Dell were on the bottom and gave up (probably a wise decision) but the Apple iPod is just one of an eventual million other better products. I see no reason why any company with enough money and ingenuity can't beat the iPod into second place, it's just a matter of time.

    1. Re:There will be an iPod killer by peektwice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There will be an iPod killer

      And monkeys might fly out my butt...hey...what the fuck...

      Seriously though...all the supposed iPod killers thus far have been pitiful imitators.
      The real iPod killer is likely to be either

      A. something else from Apple, who spends a TON of money on interface design from an artistic and human approach, or

      B. something entirely different, that is not just a media player. This is why you find iTunes on phones. Apple realizes that this or potentially the PDA market can displace them from their throne, and they are ahead of the curve.

      --
      Other than this text, there is no discernible information contained in this sig.
    2. Re:There will be an iPod killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You based that on the assumption that Apple is doing nothing but wait for someone to take over. There is a huge R&D going on behind the screen. Just look at the patents Apple get. For all we know, they already have the next generation iPod almost ready for manufacturing. Not only the "iPod killer" compete with the iPod on the market, but it must kill this hidden target. Not an easy thing to do if you don't know what you must kill. Furthermore, time is what you don't have. The longer it takes to kill iPod, the bigger iPod userbase out there to overtake. The estimate now is 50 millions and in a couple years, it can be 100 millions. If it takes a couple years to come up with a true iPod killer, Apple still won't die right away. 3rd party vendors won't simply dismiss the 100 million userbase. That gives Apple time to design an iPod-killer killer. And your player is not compatible with the biggest paid music download service.

      So far, there is one iPod killer. The company is called Apple. Its product, iPod nano, killed iPod mini at its height of popularity.

    3. Re:There will be an iPod killer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "iPod nano, killed iPod mini"

      Both suck donkeys ass. Sandisk Sansa is million times better.

    4. Re:There will be an iPod killer by JonLatane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Undoubtedly someone will eventually beat out the iPod, or other devices will become small and powerful enough to toss it into that chasm called obsolesence. However, as it stands today there's pretty much no way for the iPod to lose out, even with a consumer base that is more open to change than ever before. The word "iPod" is to MP3 players as JIF is to peanut butter, Windex is to window cleaner, and Lysol is to disinfectants. I could name at least 10 people off the top of my head, more if I sat and thought for a while, who can tell you all about how awesome iPods are but would just look at you and scratch their head if you said the word "MP3 Player." The only way iPod can fail is if it just utterly fails to keep up with the competition, has some kind of severe flaw that hurts users in some way, or (as I said before) becomes obsolete.

    5. Re:There will be an iPod killer by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Aside from anything else...

      If it takes a couple years to come up with a true iPod killer, Apple still won't die right away. 3rd party vendors won't simply dismiss the 100 million userbase. That gives Apple time to design an iPod-killer killer. And your player is not compatible with the biggest paid music download service.

      This doesn't really add up. Say someone does come up with said killer. ITMS provides /some/ revenue to Apple, but all those units in circulation don't generate revenue for Apple (with the exception of those manufacturers who pay license fees for "made for iPod" - and even then, that's strongly dependent on the licensing model. So the userbase isn't /hugely/ important - it doesn't change the then "obsolesence" (I know, not strictly accurate phrase) of the unit versus that which has surpassed it.

    6. Re:There will be an iPod killer by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      This is a good point. For all we know, Apple might have an "iPod killer" on some whiteboard in somebody's office right now. They're not going to do a damn thing with it though, unless it looks like the current cash cow is going to be slaughtered by somebody else.

      Right now, Apple doesn't even have any reason to substantially improve on the iPod, except as they're forced to by competition from SanDisk and others. The price point for players is basically fixed, so at any time it makes sense to not give the machine more capacity than you really need to. This is why you're seeing SanDisk outdo Apple in capacity right now; I'm sure that come Christmas, Apple will probably match them. Without competition, they have no reason to eat into their margins.

      If somebody comes out with a real threat to the iPod, then you'll see Apple either start to engineer something new, or pull the sheet off of whatever they might have waiting in the wings. But until there's a threat, they have no reason to give us more than the occasional upgrades (to keep people who have iPods that have worn out or become obsolete buying Apple). I wouldn't expect something truly earth-shattering from them, not while they're doing so well.

      Of course, Apple-watching is notoriously unreliable. I should couch all this by saying that the best analysis of Apple is always hampered by the fact that it's driven by Mr. Jobs, and he seems to have made a career out of defying expectations.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    7. Re:There will be an iPod killer by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Apple doesn't run ITMS as a profit maker. The ITMS just about breaks even. It's more a traffic generator to drive iPod sales.

    8. Re:There will be an iPod killer by darklordyoda · · Score: 1

      I'd have to dispute you on the peanut butter remark. I'm a Skippy man, myself.

    9. Re:There will be an iPod killer by NotAgent86 · · Score: 1

      Position in this market seems to be based on more than both the design and delivery of hardware and software. Apple had credibility, or at minimum an established position, with those who controlled the content. Both of these contributed to their ability to enter and effectively take over the market, IMHO. Right company, right time, right place.

    10. Re:There will be an iPod killer by MyNameIsEarl · · Score: 1

      Peter Pan Peanut Butter is the only homonigized peanut product I will eat with jelly.

    11. Re:There will be an iPod killer by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Ha, Jif is a cleaning product in Australia.

      What does this say, who knows? But maybe, if you look close enough, there is some significance there, a moral to the saying if you will.

    12. Re:There will be an iPod killer by flagstone · · Score: 1

      "It's a floor wax!"
      "It's a dessert topping!"
      "Tastes great...and just look at that shine!"

      --
      These people have looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined.
    13. Re:There will be an iPod killer by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Both suck donkeys ass. Sandisk Sansa is million times better.

      I know that was flame bait, but while I do agree the Sansa has a lot going for it, it would be nice if it support more than the minimum file formats. When you have started converting to the MP4 audio format, known as AAC (Advanced Audio Coding), which has better quality at lower bit rate, or you have lossless encoded music (ALE or FLAC), then the Sansa doesn't cut it. The FM radio is a big plus, unless you are in Europe (not an option here!?) so it ends up being on par with the iPod Nano or less.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
  20. Better... by Kelson · · Score: 1

    ...to go out with a whimper than a bang, eh?

    1. Re:Better... by 70Bang · · Score: 1


      ...to go out with a whimper than a bang, eh?


      ...that's what Rio did, isn't it?

      Someone correct me, please, but didn't Rio predate iPod?

  21. dude! by minus_273 · · Score: 5, Funny

    dude! you're exiting the market!

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  22. Dell's never done niches well by jht · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When you look at Dell's strengths, it's always been in mainstream products (PCs, laptops, and servers), significant add-ons to them that get used as revenue boosters (printers, low-end network hardware), and to a lesser extent displays and now TVs. Other branded add-ons like the Axim PDAs and their various MP3 players have never really been a hit, because they're the type of consumer electronics that get bought in person - and Dell doesn't do that. It wouldn't shock me at some point to see Dell drop the PDA line, too.

    They've had enough hiccups in recent months that the pressure to execute is probably building. Dell has never been about "cool", or innovation. They've always been a supply chain-oriented company who makes money by taking a proven technology, building it faster and cheaper than everyone else, and taking advantage of every inventory trick in the book to keep the balance sheet clean. That works great for computers, but virtually nobody would ever buy a MP3 player over the web from them based on that alone. And Dell can't do sexy like Apple can. No wonder Michael Dell always sounds so bitter when he talks about Apple. He's about as much of an Anti-Jobs as any tech CEO could possibly be.

    --
    -- Josh Turiel
    "2. Do not eat iPod Shuffle."
  23. in other news by kahrytan · · Score: 1


    Dell also decides to quit making pcs and concedes to Apple.

    --
    \
    1. Re:in other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite a market share several times that of Apple?

  24. Fiery Death by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 2, Informative

    and not killing people in fiery laptop-related explosions

    Seems like Dell is taking all the blame for Sony's problem. http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=33 926

  25. It's not "flamebait" at all. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like it or not, the fact is that some Dell laptops have experienced problems with explosions. Those laptops were literally exploding, and many were close to injuring people. I'm sure you've seen the video clips. And don't suggest that it was a minor problem. Dell went to the effort of recalling the susceptible laptops. That's a VERY expensive undertaking for a "minor" problem.

    The summary is merely pointing out a very real issue with certain Dell laptops. When discussing other failed Dell products, it's important to keep such issues in mind. If you can't keep your emotions under control when facing these kinds of real-world issues, perhaps you should take a break from Slashdot.

  26. In the summary... by Digz · · Score: 2, Informative
    "...left the Windows-based player market to the four big players -- SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative."

    Granted, it would be much clearer as Windows Media-based, but I believe that's what the summary was alluding to.

    --
    SYS 64738
  27. They're still available.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You can still snag one on Dell Outlet (which is, to my knowledge, only available to the US) for cheap. I'm just waiting for them to get even cheaper now that they're discontinued....

  28. Shocked, shocked I say! by saboola · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ..because I thought they left the mp3 market like two years ago

  29. Simple Lesson Learned by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Windoze Media is a loser. Hell, they gave those things and the music away and people did not use them. A friend of mine got one from his apartment complex as a spiff for not moving. The DRM'd music the RIAA tried to push on campuses was a flop even when they gave it away. LSU never got suckered with that one so my buddy never bothered. He used WMP, as much as it sucks, to load it up and enjoyed it the player. Would he have spent $200 for it? Never. When he gets a new computer and WMP no longer works with his little device, the device is going in the trash. Music is about fun. Cool is easy. DRM is not fun and little devices that don't work everywhere are not easy. If Michael Dell can't push it, no one can.

    As someone else pointed out, easy is when the device shows up as a mass storage device and plays whatever format you have without transcoding.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      It's Windows. And last I checked, iPod/iTunes were still DRM'd up the wazoo.

    2. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by Glendale2x · · Score: 2, Insightful

      iPod/iTunes has a lot of DRM? Have you ever used iTunes with an iPod? It's crazy simple and transparent. Remember, Apple *had* to include some kind of DRM to get the distribution rights they did; the record companies demanded it. Even then, it's very light DRM compared to other stuff out there. Easy to strip if you really wanted to. Burn it to CD if you like. As far as DRM goes, it's pretty damn lightweight. Don't like DRM? Rip CD's and just copy the files to the iPod. It's possible Apple gets away with this light DRM because it's tied to a single player, the iPod with iTunes.

      If you had to use approved encrypted headphones to hear the music, like they want with HDTV, then I'd agree with you. Apple has to include DRM, so they do, but it's not hardcore DRM.

      --
      this is my sig
    3. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      Parent was complaining about how DRM and devices don't work everywhere. I can't buy music from iTunes and stick it into my Walkman phone. Ya, I'd have to burn it to CD and then rip it. I wouldn't call that easy.

    4. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by toddestan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, Apple uses it's DRM as a tool to keep third parties from selling songs to iPod users, as well as keeping people from loading up songs bought on iTunes to something other than an iPod. That's not transparent in my eyes - actually it's pretty restrictive, despite some of the hoops you can jump through to make it "just work". I'm not a fan of Windows media either, but atleast you get a choice of both music stores and players if you go that route.

    5. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by Glendale2x · · Score: 1

      As I alluded, perhaps it's the lock in that allows them to get away with rather light DRM compared to other options.

      --
      this is my sig
    6. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by toddestan · · Score: 1

      I kind of doubt that the record companies care much about Apple's bottom line.

    7. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by siegesama · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "tool to keep third parties from selling songs to iPod users?" The iPod plays non-DRM'd MP3 (and other formats, though as we all know, not Ogg, grr) just fine.

      Now, the bit about iTunes-bought music being playable only on an iPod (unless you want to throw away a CDR) is a big pain. However, I believe that if Apple could get away with selling the music without the encryption (which is apparently a step applied in iTunes), they would.

      --
      what the hell is a 'junk character', anyway?
    8. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by ahknight · · Score: 1

      Yes, it has DRM, but they went through the trouble to make it cross-platform DRM (the two that matter) so that everyone (that matters) could use it. Microsoft has done no such thing, and will not.

    9. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      And Apple refuses to license it's DRM to other MP3 player manufacturers, while Microsoft's DRM is licensed to third parties so you have multiple MP3 players that work with it. I wouldn't call either 'cross-platform'.

    10. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Hold on. You're concerned about interoperability, and you bought something from SONY? Are you high?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by Moofie · · Score: 1

      So how do I play DRMed Windows Media on my Mac? Oh, I don't. My bad.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    12. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by Khuffie · · Score: 1

      Note that last sentence where I said I wouldn't call either solution cross platform.

    13. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by Moofie · · Score: 1

      So, having arbitrarily defined an iPod as a "platform", you make your point. Righto.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    14. Re:Simple Lesson Learned by toddestan · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by "tool to keep third parties from selling songs to iPod users?"

      Exactly what I mean. Apple takes advantage of the fact that most music cannot be sold without DRM on it, due to the demands of the license holders of the music, by not opening their DRM.

  30. I've own the original Dell Jukebox... by HotBlackDessiato · · Score: 1

    ....and use (and recharge) it repeatitily every day. Apart from the crappola Musicmatch software included, my Dell Jukebox has been trouble free, and I've bee happy with it in every regard. So where do I go for my next mp3 player? (if, heaven forbid I ever do need a replacement) Bloodly dell, can't even keep doing someting it was good at.

    --
    "If you don't have eyes you shouldn't have wings" -- Carl Pilkington
  31. Re:It's not (Apple) "flamebait" at all. by klubar · · Score: 1

    I believe that Apple is "fast following" the Dell trend in recalling exploding laptop batteries. Apple "we don't need no stinking recall" has finally been pressured into recalling their exploding batteries.

    It's not a bug, it's a feature.

  32. Re:I've own the original Dell Jukebox... by HotBlackDessiato · · Score: 1

    Bloody careless grammer me....breath deeply before post button hiting next time idiot.

    --
    "If you don't have eyes you shouldn't have wings" -- Carl Pilkington
  33. Not completely accurate by digitalderbs · · Score: 4, Funny
    instead preferring to stick with PCs, printers, and not killing people in fiery laptop-related explosions.

    I'm a Dell representative, and I'd like to say that this statement is not entirely true. We're also in the business of selling monitors, and we'll continue to kill people in fiery laptop-related explosions.
  34. Re:I've own the original Dell Jukebox... by HotBlackDessiato · · Score: 1

    ...that should be "you idiot".

    --
    "If you don't have eyes you shouldn't have wings" -- Carl Pilkington
  35. Uhm.. Apple has a Windows-based player... the iPod by neuroklinik · · Score: 3, Informative
    Dell will still be a third-party reseller of other MP3 players like the Creative Zen, but has left the Windows-based player market to the four big players -- SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative."


    I'd say that Apple should be in that list of players who make a Windows-based portable audio device. The iPod works on Windows too.

  36. Re:I've own the original Dell Jukebox... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention "grammer", "breath" and "hiting" should be "grammar", "breathe" and "hitting."

    Seriously, I think you got more words wrong in the post to correct your original post. That's gotta be some sort of record.

  37. the problem is stock holders by SethJohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I see no reason why any company with enough money and ingenuity can't beat the iPod into second place, it's just a matter of time.

    The bedevelling problem is that public companies have these annoying stock holders who have little patience waiting for a product line to turn a profit. With Dell in particular, they've got razor-thin margins on EVERYTHING, and a bunch of stockholders screaming for profits to double year-after-year. Dell has far less time than a company like Microsoft where they've got huge margins on the OS and office suites, so they frequently win the 'cut off the air supply' waiting game, even when they don't have this 'ingenuity' thing you speak of.

    Seth

    1. Re:the problem is stock holders by mpcooke3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, plus Microsoft have cash reserves the size of a medium sized country and have a record of throwing it at new markets for years if neccessary.
      Dell is not that kind of business.

  38. Re:I've own the original Dell Jukebox... by HotBlackDessiato · · Score: 1

    You forgot my title line, but I appreciate the help always.

    --
    "If you don't have eyes you shouldn't have wings" -- Carl Pilkington
  39. What is an mp3 player? by gelfling · · Score: 1

    It's not a device. The device is actually pretty simple to make. You can get 31 different new units 4GB or larger from Tigerdirect. No that's the easy part. It's marketing and focus and channel and relationships and service. Do you remember when the first iPods had that battery 'problem' where Apple initially said stuff it go buy another one? They changed their tune pretty damn quick because they wanted loyalty and marketshare. Can you imagine any other mp3 vendor doing that? I can't. Dell left the mp3 space because they never had much commitment to it in the first place. They thought they could make cheap impulse items they didn't have to service or support or worry about. But in fact it's a market in its own right.

  40. I might of missed something, but..... by 8127972 · · Score: 1

    ..... Dell had an MP3 player? I couldn't tell based on all of the iPods that I see on the subway on a daily basis.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  41. Neither Microsoft nor Apple have homefield ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    Granted, it would be much clearer as Windows Media-based, but I believe that's what the summary was alluding to.

    FWIW, the summary repeatedly referred to the MP3 market. That gives neither Microsoft (.WMA) nor Apple (.AAC) a homefield advantage.

  42. Yeah, but it's not their only product. by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

    A dell axim with 1/4GB + another 8 GB of storage cards ($400 total, all new) gives you a great mp3 player, wifi Internet, tons of games, Direct3D Mobile and hardware accelerated 3D, bluetooth, a VGA resolution screen, and tons more features.

    Who needs another tiny dedcated MP3 player when I can get a nice little 600 MHz computer? My expensive laptop from 1999 didn't even have that good of specifications.

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    1. Re:Yeah, but it's not their only product. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Can your Axim play music for 16 hours straight? How about 4 hours of video? Does it have 60 gigs of storage to hold enough music and video to be able to go weeks without listening to the same thing twice?

      If so, I'll consider replacing my black 60 gig iPod video.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  43. Windows based? by CODiNE · · Score: 2, Insightful

    left the Windows-based player market to the four big players -- SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative."

    Strangely iTunes and iPods also work just fine on Windows. Was he attempted to say Windows-centric? Mac-ignoring perhaps? Or did he mean based on PlaysForSure? Microsoft Sponsored? Windows-only? Obviously they aren't all running Win CE.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  44. In other news: man bites dog! by SeaFox · · Score: 1

    Looks like another case of an "iPod Killer" being killed by the iPod. I'm expecting Creative to follow in the next 6-12 months given they're going to start making iPod accessories. Seriously, you know a company has lost faith in their player when they start adding value to their competitor's products.

  45. Hmmm. by Overfiend1976 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps they're a bit underfunded after having to replace 4 million+ laptop batteries?

    --
    This sig will self destruct in 5 seconds.
    1. Re:Hmmm. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps. You should worry, though. After all, Apple is less than half the size of Dell, and is in the process of replacing 2 million+ laptop batteries.

  46. Good for Dell by Sohil · · Score: 1

    They succeeded because they were lean, if want to emulate or continue that success they better continue being lean.

    --
    http://sohilsblog.blogspot.com
  47. Who's dumber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who's dumber, the guy who "pays too much" for an iPod whose design, quality, and ease of use give him continuing satisfaction, or the "smart guy" who saves a few bucks on a 3rd party "iPod killer" and goes on to quickly tire of the device's boring and cheap design along with its inefficient and crude interface and controls and buggy synchronization software?

    1. Re:Who's dumber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't judge between the two, but I'd say that neither is very smart, or that neither is really interested in music. Why else would they focus, whether positively or negatively, on the visual aesthetics or the technical qualities of their device of choice instead of actually using it to listen to music?

    2. Re:Who's dumber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who's dumber, the guy who "pays too much" for an iPod whose design, quality, and ease of use give him continuing satisfaction, or the "smart guy" who saves a few bucks on a 3rd party "iPod killer" and goes on to quickly tire of the device's boring and cheap design along with its inefficient and crude interface and controls and buggy synchronization software?

      In this example, I would say the dumber person is you.

    3. Re:Who's dumber? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >its inefficient and crude interface and controls and buggy synchronization software? Wait, I thought you liked the ipod?

  48. Re:It's not (Apple) "flamebait" at all. by TClevenger · · Score: 1
    Or maybe they wanted to verify that their batteries were a problem, determine which serial numbers and dates were affected, and make sure Sony was going to stand behind them before opening the floodgates.

  49. Fiery Explosions? by twifosp · · Score: 2, Interesting
    and not killing people in fiery laptop-related explosions.

    Wow, great piece of editorial comment there! I'm not one to defend cooperate giants here, but Sony is to blame for the shoddy electronics not Dell. Dell at least was the first to issue a recall for the battery issue. Apple uses the same batteries that cause fires and they are just NOW coming out with the a recall. They've known about it for a long time now. HP has about 3 million of the batteries in circulation and who knows how many Sony laptops contain the dodgey batteries. Neither of those companies have even issued a warning about the batteries, nor has Sony owned up to the issue and prefers to let the distributors of their energy storing grenades take the fall.

    If you want to flame a company, flame Sony. How exactly does Dell come out looking like the bad guy here? And on an article about MP3 players no less.

    Slashdot is getting as bad as Fox news. Congratulations editors.

    1. Re:Fiery Explosions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is getting as bad as Fox news. Congratulations editors.

      Are you implying that Fox would be biased in their reporting? I mean come on, Bill O'Reilly has a program that advertises itself as the "No Spin Zone"! If anything implies "unbiased" on a channel, that sure does. Especially coming from him!

  50. Of course, as the system integrator by HBI · · Score: 1

    They wouldn't have any responsibility for testing the oem parts they assemble into a final system, getting it certified, or anything like that.

    Didn't think of that, i'm sure. But don't worry, the product liability litigators have.

    There's lots of blame to go around here, but the name on the bezel is the one that will pay the lion's share of the settlement ultimately.

    --
    HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    1. Re:Of course, as the system integrator by twifosp · · Score: 1

      Yea, that's why Sony is reimbursing both Dell and Apple for each recalled unit. Nice logic there, but no cigar.

    2. Re:Of course, as the system integrator by HBI · · Score: 1

      Cost of goods is going to pale compared to the settlements demanded.

      Wait until the fat lady sings.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
  51. Still for sale, Dell page isn't down by Dh5 · · Score: 1

    http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/category.aspx?c =us&l=en&s=dhs&cs=19&category_id=5909&~ck=anav What's going on here? It's still for sale. Dell's pages disappear often.

  52. It compares well, yes. by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

    >> Can your Axim play music for 16 hours straight?

    Yes. I did opt for the bigger battery though, and I've heard that the lower batter can only operate as an mp3 player (the screen backlight off) for around 7 hours.

    >> How about 4 hours of video?

    No, I only get about 3 1/2 hours on one battery charge. It is long enough to watch two of the many feature-length DVDs I have transcoded and stored on a memory card. They look great, I just don't like that they take over 100MB per hour of footage. I have a CF card filled with all the movies I am interested in re-watching any time soon.

    >> Does it have 60 gigs of storage to hold enough music and video to be able to go weeks without listening to the same thing twice?

    It has SD and CF card slots. Currently it only has 8 1/2 GB in the device, but I have additional cards I swap when I want to change them.

    Besides, I don't feel the need to carry around 60 gigs of music -- I have found that 7GB is more than enough for the music I own.

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    1. Re:It compares well, yes. by Frobnicator · · Score: 1


      Yes, I can play video and music roughly as long as you can with your ipod 60GB, at VGA resolution and nicely encoded mp3 rates.

      No, I don't have all that storage with me all the time, I can swap it out.

      I suppose reversing the question is fair game, too:

      Can you play RPGs on your ipod?
      Can you play online games on your ipod?
      Can you play nethack on your ipod?
      Can you play ANY fun games on your ipod?
      Can you connect to the Internet at work without your boss tracking it to your PC, using your ipod? -_-
      Can you discretely record hours of incriminating personal converations at work using your ipod?
      Can you download DivX movies on your and play them back?
      Can you use skype on your iPod at any wifi hotspot?
      Can you use your ipod to transfer files to/from work, sync your email, and do personal projects?

      So while I suppose I did miss out on some of the storage space, for the cost I believe the device is much better all around.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    2. Re:It compares well, yes. by Frobnicator · · Score: 1

      Looks like I even forgot some more...

      Does your iPod let you take notes on it?
      Does your iPod have 3D accelerated game support? (Wait, I forgot, I said game.)
      Does your iPod let you grab pictures off your friend's digital camera?
      Does your iPod let you swap music with your friends when you get together, and copy it from one device to another?
      Does your iPod let you switch from playing music/games to taking notes with a single button press, or even listen to music while taking notes electronically?
      Does your iPod work as a GPS and navigation system? (True I had to buy that separately, but you buy music...)
      Does your iPod have an IR port that works as a universal remote control?
      Does your iPod have an IM client?

      I suppose I'll stop adding to the list, I hope you got the idea.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    3. Re:It compares well, yes. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      You make the claim that a PDA is as good of a portable music player than an iPod. I prove you wrong.

      I never said the iPod was any of the other shit you've mentioned. You prove that you're a fucktard.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  53. Clearly, Apple isn't even a player in this market. by pwnage · · Score: 1
    At least according to the poster.

    Apple isn't a player in this market? Hello, they own this market! Perhaps you meant the "crippled WMA market."

    Carry on!

    --
    Reminder: Apple owns 1/255th of the internet.
  54. Re:It's not (Apple) "flamebait" at all. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    Man, listen to that spin! Dell is issuing a recall for their fundamentally broken if not outright dangerous product, but Apple's recall is merely a verification of a possible problem.

  55. I like toast. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just love the smell of the exploading DJ in the mornin.

  56. Re:Clearly, Apple isn't even a player in this mark by k3vlar · · Score: 1

    I think the article meant "Windows-based player" was interchangable with "crippled WMA player". It's either that, or "crippled AAC player". Lesser of two evils, take your pick. I picked the shiny white one.

    --
    Unlike porn, which yada yada rimshot hey-ooh!
  57. Out of DJ, Out of PDA, OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Out of DJ, Out of PDA, OK, as long as the keep on with the DMA... I mean, AMD.

    jocund is not a word

  58. You're not looking at the bigger picture by IANAAC · · Score: 1
    If your argument is that mp3 players are commodities at this point, you've been proven wrong by the very story you're writing about.

    Just because Dell couldn't make it work for them doesn't mean that mp3 players aren't commodities. Look around. There are a TON of other brands selling mp3 players cheap. Not in ipod form factor either. Think USB flash players.

    And they sell too. There's a whole lot more to this world than the US.

  59. Important Error in the Summary by Dekortage · · Score: 1

    The summary says, "Dell... has left the Windows-based player market to the four big players -- SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative."

    Last I checked, the iPod works on Windows. What you really mean is that Dell has left the Microsoft DRM player market. So your "four big players" is missing a fifth larger one: Apple.

    --
    $nice = $webHosting + $domainNames + $sslCerts
  60. quietly? by symes · · Score: 0

    "Dell [wanted to] Quietly Leave MP3 Market" but then it got a mention on /. In other news... bag full of cats escape

  61. CAN SOMEONE PLEASE POST THE VIDEO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like most everyone else, I know the cultural reference for the joke. I think it's funny. It's easy to recognize. But I never watch TV and so have never seen a commercial from the ad campaign. A few minutes on YouTube and Google yield zilch. Anyone know where I can see a copy of an advert from this campaign?

  62. I never knew. . . by Zobeid · · Score: 1

    I never knew that Dell made a MP3 player. This is the first I've heard about it.

    I guess that's a pretty good summary of how it went over?

  63. Re:I've own the original Dell Jukebox... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, the Dell MP3 player product line was just a rebranding of the Creative product line. If you liked the Dell DJ, then make your next MP3 player a Creative Zen Nomad. They're the same thing with slightly different controls on the case.

  64. They're available in Dell's Outlet but... by sfled · · Score: 1

    ...why would anyone pay $79 bucks for a refurb 512MB player, when you can get a *new* 512MB iPod Shuffle for $67 on Amazon?

    hoofah.

    --
    I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
  65. I'm fascinated by this iPod fanboyism by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    "This commercial product is highly successfully, and I bought one, therefore I shall sneer at you!" Somehow this just doesn't mesh with other /. stances ...

    Is it because it's a cool kid clique that slashdotters can actually get into? ;)

  66. Me Too by colin8651 · · Score: 0

    Can someone name a good "Me Too" brand??

  67. There's 5 by Gonzodoggy · · Score: 1

    Actually, Dell is leaving the mp3 player market to the big 5. Apple sells more iPods to PC users than all the others.

  68. Re:I've own the original Dell Jukebox... by kaizokunami · · Score: 1

    I was really happy with my gen 1 DJ too until the headphone jack came loose last year. It's a simple soldering job to fix it, but I don't have a good soldering tool right now and when I took it to a computer repair shop they insisted they couldn't do it either. :/ So right now it's just a really small portable hard drive.

    Last Christmas I got a replacement: a Creative Zen Touch. The only thing I really miss from the Dell was the scroll wheel control - Dell licensed Creative's file system so it's pretty much identical. You don't even have to use MusicMatch; there's some great third-party software from Red Chair Software which is a nice answer to the bundled software.

  69. Marshmallows by phorm · · Score: 1

    I did quite enjoy this blurb however:

    If you switched over from a Dell because you ran out of marshmallows, or because you had some marshmallows left over after the last Dell caught fire, and wanted a PC to match it, your luck stinks, go buy an HP

    I'm going to have to break out blender and come up with a render of somebody toasting marshmallows over some Sony batteries and/or Dell+Apple laptops.

  70. Up and gone like a fart in the Wind? by n7ytd · · Score: 1

    Gee, that's funny, I had to search for "ditty" on their homepage to find them:


    http://accessories.us.dell.com/sna/productdetail.a spx?c=us&l=en&cs=19&sku=DJDTY90

  71. What? by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    >Farewell Dell! One market you can't take over by undercutting
    >on price!

    OK, I really don't get it. Why the identification with
    Apple and the triumphalism? What do you get out of it?

    What would be so awful about somebody else doing
    well selling cheaper music players?

  72. Zune? by steve_bryan · · Score: 1

    ...SanDisk, Samsung, Sony, and Creative

    Isn't much of this speculation and talk of Apple and the iPod missing the main point? It hasn't been released yet but Microsoft has made it clear that they intend to nudge aside all their previous partners with their own entry in the market. It isn't like Dell entered the market not realizing that Apple had this iPod thing going on. But the entry of Microsoft probably was a rather unpleasant surprise.

  73. Re:Uhm.. Apple has a Windows-based player... the i by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

    I think you have to be careful about defining the iPod as a true Windows-based portable music player. For one thing, you need Apple's iTunes software to copy and organize files on an iPod.

    In contrast, the players from Sandisk, Samsung, iRiver and Creative Labs work in accordance to the Windows Media Play for Sure specs, and music/podcast files can be copied to the player using Windows Media Player 10 or even Windows Explorer.