Slashdot Mirror


Rob Levin, lilo of FreeNode, Passes

sneak was the first of many to tell us of the death of Rob Levin, known as lilo, the head of FreeNode and of its parent organization, PDPC. A transcript from the channel: ".:17:18:40:. [freenode] -christel(i=christel@freenode/staff/gentoo.christe l)-
[Global Notice] On the 12th September Rob Levin, known to many as Freenode's
lilo, was hit by a car while riding his bike. He suffered head injuries and
passed away in hospital on the 16th. For more information please visit
#freenode-announce
17:19:39==> Topic for #freenode-announce: Together with the PDPC board we are
currently preparing a general announcement, please also feel assured that we will
continue working with PDPC to ensure continuous service on freenode, in line with Rob's
mission."
Richard Hartmann writes, I just wanted to add that we of FreeNode will create a condolence book. All wellwishes can be sent to condolences@freenode.net."

365 comments

  1. RIP lilo by tonsofpcs · · Score: 2

    RIP Rob Levin.

    1. Re:RIP lilo by Emmettfish · · Score: 4, Interesting
      We had numerous and public arguments. I thought he was a jerk. He felt the same way about me. Both of us knew the good things the other did for the Free Software and Open Source communities, but every time we got into it, it was nothing but pure argument.

      I did respect him, and the work that he's done. While I disagree with a lot of the way he managed things, there's no doubt that he did what he did with the best of intentions. He will be missed as both a leader of the community and a human being.

      I wish the staff well in the upcoming days and weeks -- It will not be easy. I would urge complainers, sycophants and jerks to back off for a while. Best wishes to his family and friends.

      Emmett

    2. Re:RIP lilo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! :-(

      Very nice guy, I always enjoyed chatting with him. RIP.

    3. Re:RIP lilo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I would urge complainers, sycophants and jerks to back off for a while. Best wishes to his family and friends.

      I have no idea who either Rob or you are. However, I can't stand people who have to push themselves to the front of the crowd to define how others should feel or act. How about you just back off and let others do what they will.

      By the way, are you old/mature enough to lose the pansy locution, "I would urge ...."? Do you urge or do you not urge -- just say what's on your mind. Up or down. It's no less offensive or persuasive when you drop "would" into where it's not needed.

    4. Re:RIP lilo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      RIP Rob Levin.
      Mod parent redundant.
    5. Re:RIP lilo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do agree with the crux of your argument, but surely you do realize that he likely did not intentionally use "would," and that it is part of his vernacular? I would say (har har) that, in my experiences, this usage is very common.

    6. Re:RIP lilo by StormyWeather · · Score: 1

      Was this the same Lilo that used to administer #linpeople on Undernet years ago (like in 95/96)?
      If so that sucks, Lilo helped me get a start in linux which enabled me to grow in IT and become an administrator then programmer.

    7. Re:RIP lilo by Floody · · Score: 1
      Was this the same Lilo that used to administer #linpeople on Undernet years ago (like in 95/96)? If so that sucks, Lilo helped me get a start in linux which enabled me to grow in IT and become an administrator then programmer.
      Indeed, it was the same. I ran one of the linpeople irc servers after #linpeople moved from Undernet. I had significant daily interaction with Lilo for years, although not in person. In 98-99, Rob called my office. He happened to be traveling through the region and wanted to meet me. Unfortunately, that day, I was preoccupied with other matters, and didn't get the message in time to return Rob's call. Until I read this /. story, I had forgotten all about it.

      I never got another chance to meet the man in person. And now, I never will.
    8. Re:RIP lilo by sanoBabun+httpishwo- · · Score: 1

      May his soul rest in peace.

      --
      -- sig
    9. Re:RIP lilo by owlstead · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, I cannot stand persons that nitpick on statements of regret that somebody died. Especially if they were not direct friends. How about that?

    10. Re:RIP lilo by kernelistic · · Score: 1

      That would be Emmett Plant. He's a well-known member of the OSS community and a mighty fine guitarist.

      As an ex-IRC Operator and DNS server sponsor for OpenProjects.NET, this news saddens me tremendously. Though at times I did not agree with what Rob Levin said or did, I still respect his tenacity and his drive. My best wishes go out to his son, wife and family.

      I had fun working on dancer-ircd when it was still a patchset for hyb6. Those were good times!

      Andre "andy" Guibert de Bruet - aguibert@oftc.net

  2. Opportunity from Tragedy by wpanderson · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This is obviously a tragedy for his family, friends, colleagues and a complete shock to everyone who has heard of him, but once the dust has settled, it will be interesting to see how PDPC and Freenode will continue to be run.

    --
    neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
    1. Re:Opportunity from Tragedy by greyduk · · Score: 0

      who the hell modded this as troll?

    2. Re:Opportunity from Tragedy by RonnyJ · · Score: 2, Insightful
      who the hell modded this as troll?

      Probably people who read the subject 'Opportunity from Tragedy' - there's no opportunity from such a tragedy.

    3. Re:Opportunity from Tragedy by wpanderson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, in retrospect, that subject wasn't very tactful.

      --
      neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
    4. Re:Opportunity from Tragedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably people who read the subject 'Opportunity from Tragedy' - there's no opportunity from such a tragedy.

      At the very least, there's the opportunity to learn and grow. If truly nothing worthwhile came from this personal tragedy, I'd consider that an added insult.

    5. Re:Opportunity from Tragedy by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      well geeks are often socially unaware.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    6. Re:Opportunity from Tragedy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to GWB and the Republicans.

  3. Thanks Lilo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I appreciate all the good times you made possible on FreeNode, and your great stewardship of the system. Rest in peace Lilo.

  4. Loss of a good person by Cillian · · Score: 1

    Pity, he seemed like a nice guy...

    --
    -- All your booze are belong to us.
  5. You're welcome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I'm glad you appreciated it. Hey, who knew they had Slashdot in heaven?

  6. As said, good or nothing about the dead. by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    RIP.



    .

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  7. Rest in Peace :-( by Eloquence · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I only had very few interactions with Lilo, but he was always friendly and polite when I did. I am a long time user of FreeNode and a long time Wikipedian. The network has been invaluable to our community, and while of course a project like FreeNode is very much collaborative, I think he personally represented many of the core values that make it a great place for open source and free content projects. This is a very sad day. May he idle in peace. :-(

    1. Re:Rest in Peace :-( by Jon+Chatow · · Score: 3, Informative

      As someone who ended up talking to Rob on IRC every couple of days for over a year, and several times by 'phone, I can attest to this absolutely; his help to me in running the Wikimedia IRC channels was both invaluable and amazingly forth-coming - he was seemingly always available, and never anything other than friendly and massively helpful, even for the most tiresome and stupid of questions that I managed to come up with. Good bye, Rob. We will miss you. James F. Wikimedia GC.

      --
      James F.
    2. Re:Rest in Peace :-( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      ... his help to me in running the Wikimedia IRC channels ...

      And in the meantime his page on Wikipedia gets removed. :-(

  8. Re:LOL by Potor · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i just ran out of mod points. i wish i had them now.

  9. Rest in Peace, lilo by stesch · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a really sad day for freenode. He provided such a good service to all of us. :-(

  10. Re:LOL by Meltir · · Score: 2

    Same here.

  11. Last Post by pgregg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Last Post. :)

  12. RIP by cbrocious · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I got my start on Freenode many, many years ago, and now have been involved with dozens, possibly hundreds of projects, all on freenode. I've talked with Lilo many times and have never had a bad experience. One of the kindest and most helpful people I've ever met.

    My Condolences go out to his family.

    RIP lilo

    --
    Disconnect and self-destruct, one bullet at a time.
  13. Mod Parent Human Trash by db32 · · Score: 2

    I can't believe this garbage was modded informative. To think my mod points expired today and I can't shoot this down myself...

    --
    The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    1. Re:Mod Parent Human Trash by gkhan1 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the modder will be meta-modded to hell

    2. Re:Mod Parent Human Trash by db32 · · Score: 1

      And I get modded as a troll lol...seems some people really didn't like the guy. All hail maturity, compassion, and...oh wait this is slashdot isn't it? I love Apple, I hate MS, all DRM is useless, RIAA/MPAA is evil, Republicans are satanists, can I have my karma back now?

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    3. Re:Mod Parent Human Trash by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting the fact that Slashdot hasn't been like that for years now. Now the majority of Slashdot users act like "TEH EBIL SLASHBOT SHEEPLE ALWYAS HATE COPYRIGHT WHEN IT'S RIAA BUT LIKE IT WHEN IT'S GPL!!!!! BIAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  14. Stalker Connection by Planeflux · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know of there is any known connection to his stalker? Or was it just a plain accident?

    1. Re:Stalker Connection by floam · · Score: 1

      Yuck! I read that stalker blog post and it made my stomach turn, I sure hope it has nothing to do with it.

  15. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    die in a fire.
    same to the asshat that modded him positively

  16. RIP by tulare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My condolences to his family. He worked hard for what we have, right or wrong, and we should respect that and be thankful for what he has left us.




    --
    political_news.c: warning: comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
  17. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I know how you feel, but don't feed the trolls.

  18. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about we just call the cops and let them know that there's a psychopath on the loose? Or would you rather turn yourself in?

  19. WHAT by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

    That's the only response I can think of. Sorry.

  20. lilo by Bloater · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... will lie 6 feet lower than he ever lilo'd before.

  21. Just announced in #freenode-announce by Richard_at_work · · Score: 5, Informative
    22:58 +christel: Ok, first off, this is not a hoax
    22:59 +christel Rob was riding his bike on tuesday when he was hit by a car, he has spent the last few days at the neuro trauma ICU at a local hospital 22:59 +christel: where he has been in a coma
    22:59 +christel: the news reached us this morning that Rob passed away early today
    23:00 +christel: and we ask that you all respect their privacy at this difficult time
    23:01 +christel: Robs funeral is most likely to be monday afternoon, although we have yet to get confirmation as Debs is waiting to hear from the MEs office that it can go ahead as planned 23:01 +christel: and for those local, wishing to show their respects at his funeral, we ask that you email staff@freenode.net and we will try direct you as we can
    23:02 +christel: We will take some questions now and try answer them in channel, it would be appreciated if those with questions message beu, and we will answer on channel
    23:02 +christel: thank you
    My condolances to Robs friends and family.
    1. Re:Just announced in #freenode-announce by SaDan · · Score: 1
      christel: we will also try to coordinate so that we can get some things together for Debs and Benjamin, but at this point in time she has no particular wishes in that regard. Those wishing to help his family however, are encouraged to get in touch with us per email (again staff@freenode.net) and we will try connect you with those in the area that are coordinating support.
  22. Re:Who hit him? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 0

    Um.. to err is human. Let's not be exacting vengeance. Let the courts deal with part of giving justice. Thanks.

    sri

  23. More Info by ballermann · · Score: 5, Informative

    christel just posted the following in #freenode-announce

    christel> Ok, first off, this is not a hoax
    christel> Rob was riding his bike on tuesday when he was hit by a car, he has spent the last few days at the neuro trauma ICU at a local hospital
    christel> where he has been in a coma
    christel> the news reached us this morning that Rob passed away early today
    christel> Rob is survived by wife Debbie and son Benjamin
    christel> and we ask that you all respect their privacy at this difficult time
    christel> Robs funeral is most likely to be monday afternoon, although we have yet to get confirmation as Debs is waiting to hear from the MEs office that it can go ahead as planned
    christel> and for those local, wishing to show their respects at his funeral, we ask that you email staff@freenode.net and we will try direct you as we can
    christel> We will take some questions now and try answer them in channel, it would be appreciated if those with questions message beu, and we will answer on channel
    christel> thank you
    christel> the first question we've had is "What happens to freenode?"
    beu> to answer the "who verified this?" question, members of freenode staff have been in contact with Rob's family over the past few days
    christel> it is Debs wishes that freenode keeps running as close to normal as possible, and we will be working with the PDPC board to ensure that the network keeps running
    beu> we are currently formulating an announcement and hope to have it online soon, in addition to an online "book of condolences"
    christel> it has also been asked why lilos client is still connected
    christel> i am sure you will all agree that at this point in time, we feel uncomfortable killing his client and find the mere idea rather morbid
    christel> Robs nicknames will be quarantined to prevent abuse.
    christel> A lot of people have asked how they can help
    christel> Debs requests has been that people who knew Rob could donate to PDPC in his memory, or those wishing to make a more general contribution could give something to a bicycle safety campaign in their area.

    --

    Need a Wiki? Check out DokuWiki

    1. Re:More Info by tonsofpcs · · Score: 3, Informative

      From #freenode-announce
      18:03:10 <+christel> the first question we've had is "What happens to freenode?"
      18:04:09 <+christel> it is Debs wishes that freenode keeps running as close to normal as possible, and we will be working with the PDPC board to
                          ensure that the network keeps running
      18:05:04 <+christel> it has also been asked why lilos client is still connected
      18:05:28 <+christel> i am sure you will all agree that at this point in time, we feel uncomfortable killing his client and find the mere idea
                          rather morbid
      18:05:44 <+christel> Robs nicknames will be quarantined to prevent abuse.
      18:06:01 <+christel> A lot of people have asked how they can help
      18:07:07 <+christel> Debs requests has been that people who knew Rob could donate to PDPC in his memory, or those wishing to make a more general
                          contribution could give something to a bicycle safety campaign in their area.
      18:08:32 <+christel> we will also try to coordinate so that we can get some things together for Debs and Benjamin, but at this point in time she
                          has no particular wishes in that regard. Those wishing to help his family however, are encouraged to get in touch with us per email
                          (again staff@freenode.net) and we will try connect you with those in the area that are coordinating support.
      18:08:53 <+christel> "Should lilo's fellow Jews sit shiva for 30 days as is tradition?"
      18:09:17 <+christel> I am not jewish, and I dont know much about jewish traditions, so i will leave that up to each and every one of you
                          individually
      18:09:25 <+christel> "Where, as in city and state, would the funeral be?
      18:09:37 <+christel> Rob lived in Houston, Texas and the funeral will be held there
      18:10:08 <+christel> "was lilo wearing a helmet and was the car driver responsible? if they are responsible will they be charged?"
      18:10:33 <+christel> lilo was not wearing a helmet, we are unsure at this point about what will happen wrt the driver of the car
      18:11:30 <+christel> from what we know, it was a hit and run
      18:11:37 <+christel> and the driver has not yet been found
      18:12:51 <+christel> Any other questions?
      18:15:14 <+christel> I am recieving a lot of priv messages, and I am afraid I can't quite manage to reply to each and every one of you at the
                          moment, but I would like to thank you for the support and condolences
      18:16:36 <+christel> "will the name lilo still be in use on the server? be it as a bot, or otherwise?" We will q-line the nick to prevent it
                          from being used.
      18:20:48 <+christel> it has been asked why lilos client is idle only 27 hours, the reason for that is most likely scripts running

  24. Mod this jerk into oblivion, please. by SaDan · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Incredibly tasteless at a time like this. Please mod this jerk down.

    1. Re:Mod this jerk into oblivion, please. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      >Incredibly tasteless at a time like this.

      Welcome to the Interweb!

  25. 'Passes' too bland a euphamism by Bonker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first time I read the headline I was confused about what it meant. Was there some sort of position he turned down? Did he quit an important job?

    I've always despised death euphamisms, though. Trying to tone the tragedy down doesn't make it any easier to deal with for friends, families, or looker-ons. It also takes away from the importance of the death itself.

    He's dead. The man was killed in an auto accident. It's a sad, tragic ending, but it's the truth.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:'Passes' too bland a euphamism by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Religious types believe that your soul passes on to another place when your body dies in this world. Presumably it makes more sense to them than to actually say you are dead.

  26. What yah get ridein' in the street... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What yah get ridein' in the street...

  27. Freenode has been a great asset to open source by starseeker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would estimate that Freenode was responsible for more realtime communication between developers and between users/support than any other single medium, and as such it was and is a major asset to the open source movement. It has undoubtedly helped make many projects much better than would have otherwise been possible/workable.

    As a legacy, I'd say that's a pretty good one to leave.

    --
    "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
    1. Re:Freenode has been a great asset to open source by murderlegendre · · Score: 1

      You're totally right.. I've 'almost inadvertently' contributed to a few projects, just by being on freenode, and running into people who needed a little testing, comment, and so on. Come to think of it, one of the main reasons I was in a position to be helpful, was due to all that I had learned ... from channels like ##slackware on freenode. No doubt many others have had similar experiences. RIP Rob, and genuine condolences to your friends & family.

      --
      There's a Starman, waiting in the sky / He'd like to come and meet us, but he hasn't got the time.
    2. Re:Freenode has been a great asset to open source by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Could anyone explain to me why freenode in particular has been so useful for OSS projects? I'm not saying it's a bad network, but there were hundreds of other IRC networks before freenode and still are. If it died, they could and would skip to EFNET or something. Yeah maybe it has a few netsplits, but I'm sure you could find more reliable ones if that really bothers you.

  28. Sorry, I can't help it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe this'll stop the PDPC begging spam on the /wall, finally.

    Though I think I had his WALLs on ignore ever since they started to bug the living fuck out of me. Did you know he used to change his @-moniker every so often to _avoid_ his begging spam being ignored? Still, damn shame that he's gone.

    Truly an american icon.

  29. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    It is always hard to die. But it is even harder to live on with the knowledge of having killed someone.

    Let the poor boy alone - he has problems enough on his own and does not need your childish revenge

  30. All about the Benjamins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe he's going to be dead for a year for tax reasons.

  31. RIP by Antony.S · · Score: 1

    Have only met lilo a couple of times in IRC, and don't recall speaking to him, but as a fellow IRCer, RIP

  32. Sorry, Rob by weevlos · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Rob, I'm sorry about all those times we terrorized your network with banbots and the DCC SEND exploit.

    I'm sorry that after Grog took over freenode by convincing you he was Greg Lehey of FreeBSD I took the liberty of impersonating your caller ID and voice to shout obscenities and insults on Greg's voicemail.

    I'm sorry that you never learned to use SSL or SSH and we pulled your oper block password off the wire.

    I'm sorry about the time I pulled all your docs, released your SSN on the full-disclosure mailing list and gave your credit cards and checking account number to third world hustlers. That was really mean.

    Most of all, I'm sorry you're dead because I'll have to find someone new to troll.

    RIP Rob Levin, trolled to death by car.

  33. "Passes"? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Enough with the euphemisms, already. Just say that he died. "Passing" is something you do with yesterday's lunch shortly after you've eaten today's.

    1. Re:"Passes"? by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      Is it even a correct euphemism.

      I have heard "Passed away", but never passes.

    2. Re:"Passes"? by Splintax · · Score: 1

      Uh, what? You mean like taking a shit? I'm pretty sure that "passing" is a euphemism for that, too.

    3. Re:"Passes"? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Touché

  34. RIP by ferrisr · · Score: 1

    RIP man :'(

  35. I feel kinda bad... by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

    ...that I bagged on him a few times for accidentally tripping on a power cord, thus splitting the network (whether this actually happened is beyond me). I'm also terrified of riding my bike now.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    1. Re:I feel kinda bad... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I'm also terrified of riding my bike now.

      As you should be. Riding a bicycle on the streets just about anywhere in the US is dangerous as hell. It's one thing to want to exercise/save gas/not pollute/exert your rights of the road. It's another thing to be dead or paralyzed. I know waaay too many people killed or hurt from riding a bike on the road to ever do so myself (I live in an area where there are more road bikers per capita then I've ever seen before). I keep my bike riding in the woods.

      Maybe one day it'll be safe for bicyclists on the road. Until then, the only way I'm getting on a road is in a car. I'm not willing to give up my life to make a statement.

    2. Re:I feel kinda bad... by treke · · Score: 1

      Dunno about the power cord, but he has on occasion accidently banned everyone from the network. He's provided a great tool for projects over the years, and I wish his family the best in dealing with this horrible occurance.

    3. Re:I feel kinda bad... by scotch · · Score: 1
      News flash: driving in the roads is also dangerous. Are you willing to give up your life to make a statement about that? I mean that's the false dicotomy you've set up, either you are or you aren't. Reading your post, it would appear you think their are risk free activities about which one has to make no risk/benefit analysis (a less emotionally-laden way of saying "willing to give up my life to make a statement"). However, if there are such activities, cycling in the woods certainly isn't one of them.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    4. Re:I feel kinda bad... by NineNine · · Score: 1

      There's a risk/reward to doing *anything*. I haven't seen any studies or statistics, but just from my own common sense and experience, I know that riding a bike on roads in the US is as dangerous as hell. (ie: more injuries/deaths per man hour on a bike vs a car). I don't think it's rocket science to say that riding a bicycle on a road is dangerous as hell.

    5. Re:I feel kinda bad... by scotch · · Score: 1
      Of course it's not rocket science to say that. It is completely unsupported to say that. Where are your studies? How much more dangerous? I might believe it to be true, but what I don't grant you that is that the difference between the two activities is big enough to call one "dangerous as hell" while the other on is not. You can't just claim it, where are your numbers?

      Also, assume you do come up with some numbers. Like say, to make some up, cycling on the roads results in 3x more fatalities per hour on the road than driving. Wow, that sound like a lot. But they're both so low that my *reasonable* expectation of dying from the activities is very low. Like, say I ride 1000 hour this year on the roads, and my resulting expectation of dying would still be super low, like say 1/5000 chance while only 1/15000 chance for the same driving. Also, maybe I cycle much less than drive. Or maybe I derive more than 3x the benefit (qualitative) from cycling than driving.

      Anyway, these are all made up numbers, but hopefully, you get the point. You can't just claim that cycling is "dangerous as hell" implying that driving is not. I know that cycling accidents happen, and I've had a few myself (car accidents, too), but I don't personally know anyone who has died from cycling. That kind of puts an upper bound on what "dangerous as hell" means in my experience (anecdotally speaking, of course). With activities that are "dangerous as hell", the people I cycle with would be dropping like flies.

      All of this is not to say that we shouldn't try to be safer on the roads, more aware of our surroundings, more cognizant of the rules and dangers, etc, whether cycling or driving.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    6. Re:I feel kinda bad... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1
      I haven't seen any studies or statistics, but just from my own common sense and experience, I know that riding a bike on roads in the US is as dangerous as hell. (ie: more injuries/deaths per man hour on a bike vs a car).

      A while back I actually spent a few hours tracking down the statistics from places like the NHTSA website. It's hard to do a direct comparison, but from what I could tell the risk per hour of riding a bicycle in daylight was roughly comparable to driving. (The risk per mile would be much higher of course given that it takes longer to go the same distance.) The statistics are somewhat skewed because riding at night is far more dangerous. To make things worse, apparently there are quite a few drunks who have lost their drivers licenses, and they get hammered in bars and then try to ride their bikes home in the dark.

      By my math, I figured my life expectency increase from the exercise outweighed the decrease from the risk from a crash by a good margin. Even so, just to be sure I try to stick to bike paths or residential streets as much as possible. IMHO, the people who ride on hilly, narrow country roads with lots of no-passing zones and no shoulders are being both reckless and rude.

    7. Re:I feel kinda bad... by recursiv · · Score: 1

      http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/health/risks.htm

      Here are some stats for you.

      Executive summary: You're wrong.

      But read it for yourself. It's very in depth.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    8. Re:I feel kinda bad... by tap · · Score: 1
      Your common sense is completely wrong. The reason you think bicycling is dangerous is because you don't do it. It's unknown to you, and so you fear it. Data from Failure Analysis Associates, fatalities per million exposure hours:
      Skydiving 128.77
      General Flying 15.58
      Motorcycling 8.80
      Scuba Diving 1.98
      Living 1.53
      Swimming 1.07
      Snowmobiling .88
      Motoring .47
      Water skiing .28
      Bicycling .26
      Airline Flying .15
      Hunting .08
      Bicycling is much safer than driving, not more dangerous. And that's just looking at injury statistics. If your fat lazy ass dies from heart disease at 35, you're still dead aren't you? There are ZERO health benefits from sitting on your ass driving a car. There many health benefits from aerobic exercise, like riding a bike. When you consider the whole picture, accidents and health, cyclists are by far the safest people on the road. Driving a car for an hour decreases your life expectancy, riding a bicycle for an hour increases it. To put it another way, if it's a choice between driving a car or staying home, your're better off staying home. If it's a choice between riding a bike and staying home, you're better off riding a bike.
    9. Re:I feel kinda bad... by cuantar · · Score: 1

      Bicycling is also safer than "Living," and by quite a significant margin. Hmm. Perhaps that's the health benefit you mentioned?

      --
      Legalize it.
    10. Re:I feel kinda bad... by tap · · Score: 1

      The statistics are just fatalities per million exposure hours. "Living" just refers to other causes of death not listed. Like heart disease or lung cancer.

    11. Re:I feel kinda bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironic seeing the author of that page was killed cycling...

    12. Re:I feel kinda bad... by edschurr · · Score: 1

      The risk would be higher on bicycle per trip then, because a bicycle trip is longer.

    13. Re:I feel kinda bad... by recursiv · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. But the point stands.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    14. Re:I feel kinda bad... by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Yes, that's exactly what I said in the 3rd sentence.

    15. Re:I feel kinda bad... by drsquare · · Score: 1
      A bicycle journey takes 5-6 times longer than the equivalent car journey, so the risk of cycling is three times higher than in a car.

      And that's just fatalities, there are also far more non-fatal accidents involving bicycles, plus a higher rate of theft, assault, vandalism etc.

      There are ZERO health benefits from sitting on your ass driving a car. There many health benefits from aerobic exercise, like riding a bike.


      Sorry but cycling is the least effective form of exercise in the world. Cycling is an aerobic exercise like a bonsai is a tree. It qualifies, but only just. You probably get more exercise in five minutes running for the bus than an hour cycling. In fact I cycled to work for two years and didn't lose an ounce of weight, and got out of breath after a few seconds sprinting. Ironically I didn't start losing weight until I got a car and joined a gym.

      And you only have to look at the saggy, puny bodies of even the best Tour de France riders to see that cycling isn't going to keep you in shape.
    16. Re:I feel kinda bad... by scotch · · Score: 1

      LOL, what a post. I think the problem is not with cycling but with you - you're just some kind of worthless fat ass who couldn't figure out how to cycle.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    17. Re:I feel kinda bad... by edschurr · · Score: 1

      Not exactly, but yeah, I only ever skim.

    18. Re:I feel kinda bad... by paulmer2003 · · Score: 1

      ...If he would have been more intelligent and worn a helmet he would have probably been fine..

  36. just idle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    * [lilo] (i=levin@freenode/staff/pdpc.levin): Rob Levin
    * [lilo] #gaim ##freebsd
    * [lilo] irc.freenode.net :http://freenode.net/
    * [lilo] is away (Whoops, I've stepped away. For URGENT freenode help (channel flooding, trolling users, network problems or access issues), please email my pager at 4iiygyvs@freenode.net . It's my job and I'm happy to respond. For ROUTINE issues, please see http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#gettinghelp .... Please take a look at my personal blog when you get a chance: http://spinhome.org/ .... Thanks!)
    * [lilo] is identified to services
    * [lilo] idle 27:16:23, signon: Thu Sep 7 08:14:39
    * [lilo] End of WHOIS list.

  37. Passed? by munpfazy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've got no problem with friends and family members using passive, religiously charged euphemisms when discussing death. If people find it easier to talk about their sister having "passed," that's fine by me.

    But when it comes to journalism (or the slashdot equivalent), it comes off as silly at best and offensive at worst.

    Rob Levin didn't pass. He didn't "Pass", pass on, nor pass away. He DIED, and he was KILLED. This isn't just death, but death in a horrible, violent, disturbing way.

    Getting your head smashed in by an automobile and living for painful hours in a hospital critical care ward isn't gentle. It's horrible, and cruel, and ugly. Using gentle words to describe it doesn't make it any less so. It does us all a disservice by belittling the tragedy of what has actually happened.

    1. Re:Passed? by lewp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I doubt the dead, were they asked about it before they died, would want us to dwell on how we described their death. Rather, I think they'd prefer to have us remember who they were and what they did in life.

      I'm an atheist, but I have no problem with death being described as "passing". Losing someone you care about can be a lot to deal with emotionally. If using euphemisms helps with the process of coping, then I'm all for it.

      (If this was a deliberate troll, it was in pretty poor taste, but I guess IHBT.)

      --
      Game... blouses.
    2. Re:Passed? by 1310nm · · Score: 1

      Don't be a dick. A great person lost their life, whatever the circumstances are, and he and his family deserve our respect. To coldly headline his death with "Guy DIES OMFG" is insensitive and overly pragmatic, given you have a heart, I guess.

    3. Re:Passed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder aloud: was he wearing a helmet?

    4. Re:Passed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I wonder aloud: was he wearing a helmet?

      What's it to you, you politically correct little shit? Do you think he deserved to die if he wasn't? Was the driver of the car wearing a brain?

    5. Re:Passed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The word "passing" is used to DENY REALITY. I'm sure his family and friends are well aware that he is dead, so why try to hide the truth from the rest of the world, by sugar coating it? If a 100 year old man dies in his sleep, perhaps that can be referred to as 'passing away', but getting hit by two tons of metal, and then going into a coma, and finally dying, are not 'passing'.
      This is typical 'Newspeak'. (See 1984 by George Orwell)

    6. Re:Passed? by calharding · · Score: 1

      Using euphemisms for death isn't about "denying reality", it's about respect. Plain and simple. Sure, dead people don't really care if you respect them or not - considering that they're dead and all - but behaving in a way which is generally considered to be respectful is meant to convey politeness and a sense that you have some measure of care for the deceased person and/or their family.
      "Dead" is a very cold word (no pun intended) that brings to mind images of lifeless slabs of meat. Hardly the way you'd want the bereaved to have to think about someone whom they love and will never see again.

      Of course you could say that you don't care at all about the dead or their families, so why use euphamisms? Well, if that's the case then the most respectful thing to do is to not say anything at all. And in this case your respectfulness (or lack of) says more about yourself than it does about anyone else.

      --
      Before enlightenment - Code C, read Usenet, play NetHack. After enlightenment - Code C, read Usenet, play NetHack.
    7. Re:Passed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A great person lost their life,
      I thought this article was about Rob "Please Pay Me To Run an IRC NetworK" Levin.
    8. Re:Passed? by dubl-u · · Score: 1

      I doubt the dead, were they asked about it before they died, would want us to dwell on how we described their death. Rather, I think they'd prefer to have us remember who they were and what they did in life.

      Personally, I prefer to be remembered as a persnickety old coot who despised euphemism and bullshit. So for the record, when I'm dead, I insist that my friends admonish anybody who describes me as "passing", "in a better place", or having "gone to Jesus". I will, however, accept, "pushing up the daises" or "worm food".

      Of course, I've already made arrangements for the open bar at my wake, so perhaps I'm a little untraditional here.

    9. Re:Passed? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      George Carlin would no doubt have a lot to say on this issue.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  38. Another one? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Informative

    As a bike rider myself the first thing I thought of was the death in March of Richard Rauch.

    This is sad news. My sympathies to his family.

    1. Re:Another one? by johansalk · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are lots of such bike riders we don't hear of. I am sick of this. When I was in college two of my highschool buddies were killed the same way, on their bike, by cars, a year or two apart. Not only that those eco-unfriendly fat dorks won't get on bikes and ridicule us, but they're killing us too.

    2. Re:Another one? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I know what you mean. I still miss his music on "Who's Line is it Anyway".

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  39. Rest in peace, Levin by Tore+S+B · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Rest in peace.


    He leaves the legacy of being a man who started and ran the IRC network that is by far the most popular network for free software developer communication, and an invaluable asset to the entire community. We thank him for his contributions, and offer our deepest condolances to the friends and family.

    --
    toresbe
  40. We'll miss you lilo :( by Venim · · Score: 1

    This is truely sad. This person was very committed to keeping freenode running. Best of wishes to his family

  41. Why car drivers suck by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Car drivers, especially in the United States, have absolutely 0 regard for bike riders. A professor did an interesting study about how close cars come to bikers when they wear helmets versus when they don't. Not to mention in San Francisco they recently delayed a resolution that would build bike paths across the city so that bike riders didn't have to deal with ignorant SUV driving assholes too busy talking on their phone to notice a bike rider.
    Sorry for the strong language, but as a bike rider car drivers in America for the most part just totally piss me off. I have to spend my tax money attacking some random oil rich country so you can drive your SUVs, but you get all in a tizzy when I want a bike path so I don't have to worry about you hitting me even though I have as much a right to the road as you do.
    Ignorant car drivers disgust me. /Rant

    1. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Until you can do the same speed limit as the cars that have to "share" the road with you, I don't agree that you have any right to be on it, in the way, putting yourself in danger. I drive as carefully as I can around bike riders who observe the law, but I get disgusted when there's a line of cars doing 30 mph or more under the speed limit because they have to wait for a bike rider who won't let them pass. I also live and work in an area with seperate bike trails that cross roads at several points, the crosswalks have STOP SIGNS for the bikers and pedestrians (not for the cars), where they are supposed to wait for a reasonable chance to cross the road, and bikers are instructed to dismount and walk across. Instead most of them drive right into traffic without looking...

      Most of the bike riders I see on the roads in Maryland (USA) blatantly disregard any laws or right of way. I see them ride all over the road, with or against traffic and usually in front of moving cars without looking or warning.

      Maybe bike riders should get a "right" to be on the same road after they get a license, demonstrate knowledge of the law and tag their bikes with identification so they can be held responsible for breaking it? (in addition to previously mentioned being able to travel at the same speed as traffic.. good luck)

      In any case, I'm not suggesting Rob Levin is at fault for the horrible accident he was involved in. I'm very sorry to hear about it. I'm only responding to the parent poster.

    2. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd argue with you, but then I'd just be making your signature come true.

    3. Re:Why car drivers suck by ubernostrum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It goes both ways; I've seen plenty of asshole drivers, but I've also seen lots of cyclists who insist on ignoring traffic laws. Just yesterday as I was driving home from work, sitting at a stop sign, a cyclist came up behind me and went through the intersection without stopping -- quick reflexes on the part of the driver who had right-of-way were the only thing that stopped the cyclist becoming a stain on the pavement. Moral of the story: no matter what sort of vehicle you're operating, when you're on the road the laws of the road apply to you, and you need to be cautious and observant.

    4. Re:Why car drivers suck by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Informative

      Could not agree more. I have ridden and raced bikes all over Europe for years without concern. A few years ago I made the foolish decision to take my bike on vacation to Florida with me to help recover from an injury. I though the a few km in the heat would do me good. 10 mins on a fairly busy road scared the bejesus out of me. Its like I was invisible on US tarmac or something, drivers storming past at 70-80 kph just centimeters from me, not one made the slightest effort to give me any space. Not an experience I am keen to repeat.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    5. Re:Why car drivers suck by tepples · · Score: 1
      Take your bike riding pansy ass to a road designated for bike use and get the fuck out of the way.

      I will, as soon as you build a road designated for bike use parallel to your SUV roads and help my bike riding pansy ass to stay the fuck out of your way.

    6. Re:Why car drivers suck by Duncan3 · · Score: 1

      At least around here, there are 1m wide bike lanes many places, but the bikers ride on the CAR side of the line anyway.

      They do this becasue the cell phone users are usually driving in the bike lane :(

      I'm so glad California finally banned cell phones without hands-free. Paves the way for banning them entirely.

      --
      - Adam L. Beberg - The Cosm Project - http://www.mithral.com/
    7. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tips 4 cyclists

      Wear a real helmet, not a cap. Get mirrors for your bike.* Use the sidewalk if there isn't a bike lane. (I don't care if that's not legal where you are, it's better than getting hit by a car.) Assume everyone out there is out to kill you. Don't obliviously cut off traffic (mirrors can help here). Don't split lanes. Follow road signs, eg, stopping at stop signs, stop lights.

      *Above all I urge cyclists to get mirrors for their bikes.

    8. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you need to do is gather up all the rest of your fellow bike riding weenies and petition the local government to build more bike paths. It's not going to happen by itself. This is how a government run by the people for the people is supposed to work. If enough people give a shit, things will start to change. If not, well tough shit I guess. The price you pay for living in a democratic society.

      Meanwhile, get the hell out of the way or become roadkill.

    9. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen to that. Noob cyclists are generally a danger to everyone, whether ped, fellow cyclist or driver. Trouble is, few noob cyclists ever take the time to mature. And courier cyclists are dangerous too: they're on the clock and under pressure to move as fast as possible.

    10. Re:Why car drivers suck by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      I live in a major campus town, and get to watch this horror every day. Even with abundent bike lanes and slow moving traffic cyclist still feel the need to drive in between cars, acts as cars going with trafic, act as pedestrians going perpendicular to trafic, ride on the sidewalk until they hop the curb at random and cut without looking through streets. There are plenty of good natured eco-conscious bike riders out there, unfortunately in my experience they are not the majority, and when they end up getting hit by a car because they assumed bikes have some God-given right-of-way all I can do is shake my head.

    11. Re:Why car drivers suck by bcmm · · Score: 1

      If you don't have any sort of neck trouble, I find it's much better, and probably safer, to just look over your shoulder. There isn't really anywhere to mount a mirror which gives more than a tiny viewable area, and in any case it unbalances the handlebars and makes it harder to steer.

      Good cyclists should train themselves to look over their shoulders before doing anything, just as you have to train yourself to check your mirrors in a car.

      Also, I second the bit about assuming that people are out to kill you, but I feel that applies to driving, walking across roads, etc. Most people are basically not careful enough to have a car.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    12. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It does certainly NOT go both ways. Think about it:

      - Bike rider makes a mistake, gets hit by a car and dies. Car sustains minor scratches.
      - Driver makes a mistake, hits a bike rider or a pedestrian and kills him/her. Car sustains minor scratches.

      Because of this asymetry in potential outcomes, car drivers carry far more responsibility than bike riders/pedestrians - especially as long as bike riders are forced to share the road with cars. Unfortunately, that realization seems beyond the mental capacity of a large fraction of US drivers who continue to drive with a laxness that is simply astounding.

    13. Re:Why car drivers suck by bayankaran · · Score: 1

      I have to drive for a living...and I frequently come across bicyclists who has absolutely no regard for traffic rules/etiquettes. They squeezes to as little as space they can find and forget they can be in a blind spot to the person driving the vehicle. I am tolerant to bicyclists, but the looks and angry shouts I get from bicyclists for no fault of mine is disturbing.

      --
      Tat Tvam Asi
    14. Re:Why car drivers suck by ubernostrum · · Score: 1

      Because of this asymetry in potential outcomes, car drivers carry far more responsibility than bike riders/pedestrians - especially as long as bike riders are forced to share the road with cars. Unfortunately, that realization seems beyond the mental capacity of a large fraction of US drivers who continue to drive with a laxness that is simply astounding.

      No, cyclists and drivers carry exactly the same set of responsibilities:

      • They must obey all traffic laws at all times.
      • They must remain alert and aware of the other traffic on the road.
      • They must remain alert and aware of people and objects off the road which may affect traffic on the road.

      Getting everyone to realize that these rules apply to them, regardless of what sort of vehicle they're operating, would drastically improve safety.

    15. Re:Why car drivers suck by fotbr · · Score: 1

      What kind of bike are you riding than a half-pound of weight on EACH side "unbalances the handlebars and makes it harder to steer"?

      Just curious, because I've never seen a bike designed in such a way.

    16. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome. I sure am glad you were there to witness that:

      A) lilo didn't do anything to cause the accident.
      B) It was an "SUV driving asshole", and everyone knows that SUV drivers are assholes and bad drivers by default.

      Oh wait, you weren't there.

      Of course, I think it's more of a problem that people find it necessary to gather up on top of each other into large cities, where respect for human life is less important than convenience. Incidents like this happen much less often on average in environments where the population density isn't as high.

    17. Re:Why car drivers suck by Stormshadow · · Score: 1

      No offense, but I've dealt with a ton of ignorante bike riders too. They ignore traffic like they think they own the road. They pretend that traffic laws don't apply to them. News flash: "Car vs bike" ends just like "car vs person", except with more pointy metal bits. When I'm on a bike, I don't assume that I "have every right to be on the road as cars do" because I think that's an arrogant attitude and it just gets people killed. I keep my eyes peeled for traffic... and I stay the hell off the road if I can help it.

    18. Re:Why car drivers suck by berbo · · Score: 1
      Well at least in Wisconsin, cyclists do have the same rights (AND responsibilities) as motorists.

      Thats not arrogance - thats the law.

    19. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in your ideal world:

            * bikers should ride on sidewalks and dismount and cross sidewalks. (a major cause of accidents is bikers riding through a sidewalk where cars don't expect a faster moving object, so I suggest bikers should not be on sidewalks, period.)
            * bikers should pull to the right for the convenience of the car drivers. (if there's a line of cars on the right, parked, this is liable to get them hit by a door opening. This is also liable to prevent people turning onto the road, crossing, or turning left onto the road from the right side unable to see the bike and hit them. So I suggest bikers ride in the middle of the lane.)
            * bikers getting hit from behind are rare, and they typically occur at night, without a light, where one or both are drunk. (So I advocate biking in the lane, with a flashing light and letting a long line of cars pass every now and then at turnouts, but if there are not turnouts, the cars should wait their turn.)

      Note that unless it's a "limited access" freeway, like an Interstate, bikes have every right to use the road and cars must wait their turn to pass legally or, if you don't do this and/or buzz me, I'll use a public records search to look up your home address, and make a short visit to your house.

      I'm all for licensed bikes and bikers, as soon as we make it harder to get a drivers' license so people like you would have to know that bikers have every right to use the road, and states increase the fines for hitting bicyclists, admonishing law enforcement to treat it as the serious offense it is!

      Have fun motoring, asshole!

    20. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have to worry about you hitting me even though I have as much a right to the road as you do.

      Roads are made for motorized vehicles that can accelerate quickly and go at a much faster speed than a bike. Your post is like saying horse and buggies have as much "right" to the road. You're being selfish using up valuable resources that are better utlized by cars and buses.

    21. Re:Why car drivers suck by TheStonepedo · · Score: 1

      I think it's worth noting, though certainly not a cause-and-effect situation, that lilo may have been riding without a helmet. As a cyclist I have known a few people who have hit their heads hard in bike-car crashes with and without helmets and have been seriously injured or killed. He was a kind, helpful guy on IRC. I hope that when a memorial fund of some sort is made that any donations will be split fairly between FOSS and bicycle safety causes.

      --
      I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
    22. Re:Why car drivers suck by tftp · · Score: 1
      That is fine, of course. But as you say rights and responsibilities come together. So you are on a bicycle, on a road with two lanes in each direction. You are in the right lane. There are only few options:
      1. You stay in the center of the right lane and thus reduce the road from two lanes to one. If the road is in any way busy this creates a problem - drivers who are behind you are forced to merge into the left lane whenever they can, and if you take hundreds of such merges this is not safe primarily for other people who do their best to avoid you. I think most states do not allow such riding.
      2. You stay closer to the shoulder (1 meter or so, as many places prescribe.) Then you are at the mercy of drivers who, staying in the right lane, have to move as far as possible to the left to give you more space. This is not very safe either because lanes are as wide as they are because car drivers need space for safety too. They give up this safety, briefly, for you. If the car in the left lane needs to move toward the lane separator (to avoid an obstacle, for example - 100% legal and expected) then the two cars may be too close for comfort.
      3. But that's not all. If you are riding properly within 1 meter from the shoulder, what about the parked cars? They are everywhere, and unless you can ride through them you have to leave the relative safety of the right side of the rightmost lane and venture into the middle of that lane. This is worse than being there all along, since you have to check over the shoulder, wait (how?) until the traffic passes, and only then pass the parked car and return to the right. This weaving creates problems for you - because you have to change positions - and to other drivers because they have to always correctly predict your future actions.

        The (3) above is particularly dangerous. On the roads here if I, in a car, stay in the right lane then I have about 2 to 3 feet clearance to parked cars, even if I tend to stay closer to the far edge of the lane. This space is not wide enough to safely hold a bicycle rider. So if the rider weaves in and out of the gaps between parked cars he is a menace, and car drivers have to detect him and yield to him if he is out, passing the parked vehicles.

        I used to ride bicycles, and then a motorcycle. I will take a motorcycle any time over a bicycle. On a motorbike you are truly in control, and you move as fast as cars (if not faster - but that's another issue, totally voluntary on your part.) You are legal in any lane, and for a good reason - you are not a problem there. Your speed range is from 5 mph to 100, for example, and this gives you plenty of variance to merge (and plenty of acceleration for that too.) And when you do accelerate you don't have to focus most of your efforts on spinning the wheels - instead you just turn the handle toward you and continue to observe the traffic around you; the engine does the rest. You still can get in trouble on a motorbike, but that requires either the same bad luck as with cars, or some particular stupidity on part of the rider (such as riding too fast for the surface, fishtailing during poorly coordinated braking, underestimating railroad crossings, stone or wood surfaces, etc.)

        A bicycle is nothing like that. I would compare it to a toddler on a race track, among the sprinters. Possibly legal, but hardly safe there.

    23. Re:Why car drivers suck by pyite · · Score: 1

      Maybe bike riders should get a "right" to be on the same road after they get a license, demonstrate knowledge of the law and tag their bikes with identification so they can be held responsible for breaking it? (in addition to previously mentioned being able to travel at the same speed as traffic.. good luck)

      Frankly, what right do you have to be on the road? I drive much more than I ride my bike on the road, mainly because I mountain bike and when I'm on the road it's just getting to and from trails. I don't see what "right" you have more than a cyclist does to be on a road. Frankly, I don't think people should need a "license" to drive a vehicle. In a perfect world, anyone should be able to drive anything, anywhere. Obviously, that's not going to work so instead make it a more market-like system. Sell a certain number of vehicle "spots" and allow insurance companies to "sponsor" certain drivers. If you're a good driver, you can drive. If you have no demonstrably effective driving record, you have to pay up to drive. Maybe then we'd have safer roads.

      --

      "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    24. Re:Why car drivers suck by Nexx · · Score: 1

      FWIW, a lot of "bike" helmets don't cover the back of your head, and thus leave that part of your head at least moderately unprotected. I'm sure if wearing the kind of helmets skateboarders and rollerbladers wear will result in fewer major head trauma than wearing the traditional "aerodynamic" bike helmets.

      No, I dont want to wear them in the hot+muggy eastern seaboard summers either.

    25. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you won't get fit riding a motor bike.

    26. Re:Why car drivers suck by njh · · Score: 1

      Use the sidewalk if there isn't a bike lane.

      I agree with the rest of your points, but this is downright wrong. Riding on the footpath dramatically increases the chance of being killed.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vehicular_cycling

    27. Re:Why car drivers suck by tftp · · Score: 1
      What???

      I guess you don't own one. Please get a decent motorbike, and I will see you in a few months, stronger and fitter than ever. Do you know how much they weigh? Do you know that they don't have power steering? :-)

    28. Re:Why car drivers suck by dargaud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've also ridden bikes in Europe and the US, but noticed that in Colorado it's not too scary. It breaks down to this: if people have ridden bikes before, they pay more attention while driving. I currently live in a place where the roads are very narrow, there are thousands of bikers in summer, but very few accidents. A solution: force (?) everyone to ride bikes periodically, for instance when they are students...

      Something related to that which pissed me off royally is the following logic: a teenage friend of mine had an accident with his first car (in the US); conclusion of the parents: let's buy him the biggest car around so he won't get hurt next time. In that case a gigantic (but slow) '70s oldsmobile. What kind of a sick mind or education draws conclusions like this ? I've even seen it on SUV advertisement, which can be summed up as "you may not have more accidents with our SUV, but if you do, we'll make sure you kill the other guy from sheer inertia. Better than the opposite, right? So buy our Lincoln Titanagator"

      Like a fiend of mine said: "Best auto safety device? A giant pointy stick in the middle of the steering wheel. Just WATCH how carefully people would drive."

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    29. Re:Why car drivers suck by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Bike paths don't usually help because it's not the road that's the problem but the junctions.

      Pushing cyclists onto paths and off the road just means that they "appear from nowhere" every at every junction as far as the car drivers are concerned.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milton_Keynes_redway_ system

      The Milton Keynes redway system was designed when the town was built, so it's not a case of trying to fit it onto an existing road infrastructure.

      And in this case, even though accidents with a motor vehicle that occur at junctions between the redway and the road system are classes as road accidents, the redways still have a higher accident rate than the roads.

      http://www.cyclecraft.co.uk/digest/2decades.html

      Linked from that article is the original paper.

      Of course, it's likely there are confounding factors. A large proportion of experienced cyclists use the road rather than the redways. I would suspect that most inexperienced cyclists use the redways instead of the road.

      "Redways generally demand much more skill when cycling than most roads, not less."

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    30. Re:Why car drivers suck by Fulkkari · · Score: 1

      I say this as a bike rider/pedestrian. The roads are designed for car drivers, who of many have no respect of bike riders/pedestrians like me and you. I see weekly drivers at crossings and crosswalks that accelerate when they see someone is trying to cross the road. This is just shows the immaturity of many drivers. It looks especially stupid when it is winter time here and the temperature is something like -20 C (-68 F) and car drivers sitting comfortably in their warm cars are trying to ram you freezing outside. Really. Accelerating in this situations is just disgusting. Every year some kids that start school for the first time die because of some jerk doesn't have the patience to wait for the next green lights. I am a strong supporter of commuting, but commuting has here been made more expensive than using private cars. Roads are designed so that cars get the most straight road, when pedestrians and bikers have to shuttle between short pieces of road. And the traffic lights... There was some discussion in the main newspaper, that it would actually be more safe for bike riders and pedestrians to cross the road when the lights are red rather than green. I do always wait for the green light, and I must admit that there is a bit of sweet revenge when you see the angry faces of car drivers, when you stop the traffic on the road. The wait is however a small price for them to pay, after they've taken somebody's life.

      Rest in peace, Rob.

      --
      I demand the Cone of Silence!
    31. Re:Why car drivers suck by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      Yeah, because I'm trusting a Wikipedia entry which outright suggests that cyclists can ignore the laws of the roads as they see fit:

      The principles of driving require that a driver signal those who will likely be affected by a change in the movement of the driver's vehicle. If a look back meets this requirement when merging, then that is all which is required of a vehicular cyclist. While the law may require cyclists to use their arms to signal, the principle does not dictate that a vehicular cyclist must do so. Vehicular cycling requires sound judgment in the application of the principles of driving, not blind compliance with the law.

      Yeah, there's one way to increase your mortality - following road laws may not mean people know what to expect of you, and such, but 'ad hoc non compliance' is sure to put you at risk through unpredictability.

      As a completely minor aside, said article mentions nothing I could see about increased risks with riding on the sidewalk. The numerous - and in cases trivial - risks it lists for this, whilst nearly completely brushing aside any risks for riding on the road seriously tempt me to flag it as NPOV.

    32. Re:Why car drivers suck by bcmm · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was tired. What I meant was that I find any extra weight on the handlebars makes the steering feel heavier and causes you to have to exert more force to change direction. It's why I have a basket mounted behind me.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    33. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know your broken laws over there, but the speed limit should not make any difference and does not in any sane law.
      Here there are minimum speeds on some roads (mostly freeways or highways) and if you cannot
      reach them techically you are not allowed on them.
      For everything else you are only needed to be less
      than the maximum speed, less than speeds that are dangerous at the current situation (weather, ...)
      and as fast as you savely CAN go to not impose problems for others.
      If a car cannot pass a biker or whatever that has to use the street by law (and bikers have to use it) savely, then you are not allowed to pass at all, and if that is not possible for you. Then you have to slow down to the speed of the person before you, and if that is a old grandpa on his bike, bad luck to you, but your freedom ends at not trying to kill others. That's the only sane rule, so even considering how stupid US law is said to be, I'd be supprised if it is any different there.

    34. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF were you doing on a road without a bike lane where the cars are blasting along at 70-80 kph faster then you? Who is the jack ass? The simple fact of the matter is that some roads are simply not meant for slow moving vehicals. Don't ride on these roads. You cause pain for the cars in that they need to dramatically drop their speed or dive into oncoming traffic to get around you. You cause pain for yourself if someone hits you. Just don't be stupid. Find roads that are either biker safe or stay off the roads. All the complaining about the cars not slowing down 25 mph on a 60 mph road to accomidate you isn't going to make you any less likely to get your brains splattered across the pavement.

    35. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do always wait for the green light, and I must admit that there is a bit of sweet revenge when you see the angry faces of car drivers, when you stop the traffic on the road.

      I bet Rob felt the same way... right before his brains were splattered on the pavement. Ride like a jack ass, die like a jack ass. The only good thing about bikers is that through natural selection they are going to be bred out of the population.

    36. Re:Why car drivers suck by edschurr · · Score: 1

      The skateboarder helmets I've seen look thinner than bicycle helmets. Thinking about the types of accidents cyclists get into, I'd guess the bicycle helmet is generally safer for its purpose.

    37. Re:Why car drivers suck by drsquare · · Score: 1

      I think that motorists should have the same courtesey to cyclists as cyclists have for pedestrians and the rules of the road. I.e. none.

      When cyclists stop knocking down pedestrians, going through red lights, holding up traffic, and patronising everyone about how much better they are because they cycle (even though they all have arms thinner than my sister's) then I might think about not pushing them into the bushes.

    38. Re:Why car drivers suck by fotbr · · Score: 1

      Fair enough, though you'd think with modern materials someone could come up with a lightweight mirror. I agree its not a perfect solution, and turning your head is a better one, but it can't hurt to have them.

      My motorcycle is required to have mirrors, and does, and I still turn my head, but if nothing else the limited view in the mirror serves as a reminder to look over my shoulder before changing lanes or turning.

    39. Re:Why car drivers suck by sootman · · Score: 1

      And, if I may stretch "absolutely 0" the other way, bikers in SF have absolutely no regard for the rules of the road. I spent years working on Market Street in SF and have seen literally thousands of unsafe bike activities: cutting back and forth from the sidewalk to the street, going against traffic, weaving through pedestrians, zipping through stoplights and stop signs, and--I'm not exaggerating--sometimes all of the above at once.

      Just because you're smaller than a car and faster than a pedestrian does not mean you should squirt through traffic and people like a wet bar of soap. If you want me to be able to see you, be where you're supposed to be.

      On a serious, non-antagonistic note, I recommend you take a trip to Chico some day. Nowhere is perfect, but Chico is pretty nice.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    40. Re:Why car drivers suck by sznupi · · Score: 1

      In case you don't realise, speed limit isn't "nominal speed". It's _LIMIT_.
      Also...why cars should have a right to take city centers from pedestrians?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    41. Re:Why car drivers suck by sznupi · · Score: 1

      I find you description of problems with mirrors much exaggerated. Perhaps tru when mountain biking, etc., but I haven't experienced any of the problems you describe when using bike in the cite, at city roads/speeds.
      And for the record - I DO try to look behind me if there's any doubt when turning left, but often it's not neccesary. Or, OTOH, you know there's no point in looking behind. Also, you have a view of what's going behind you all the times - however narrow it would be it might warn you from possible danger.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    42. Re:Why car drivers suck by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      The study is fatally flawed, in my opinion. Basically, the guy didn't know where in the lane to ride so that he controlls driver's passing behavior. If passing margin is an issue, take the lane.

      -DM
      Lead Cycling Instructor, League of American Bicyclists

    43. Re:Why car drivers suck by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

      > "Until you can do the same speed limit as the cars that have to "share" the road with you, I don't agree that you have any right to be on it..."

      By this logic, cars should not be allowed to decellerate for turns, because they're not keeping up with traffic.

      By this logic, busses should not be allowed on roads, because they're not keeping up with traffic when they stop to disgorge passengers.

      By this logic, cars should not be allowed to || park on roads, because they're not keeping up with traffic.

      What are your thoughts on Amish buggies?

      You need new logic. The speed limit is an upper bound. In order for the street to function, it must allow lower speeds.

    44. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so glad California finally banned cell phones without hands-free. Paves the way for banning them entirely.

      Or it was passed to placate people who wanted to ban them completely, just to get them to shut up.

      I want driving with cell phones banned entirely, but banning some uses seems to be a step backwards: it's making the implicit statement that "hands-free is safe/safer", thus making it harder to ban.

    45. Re:Why car drivers suck by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, but on the other hand, hands free is safer! Substantially so. The people that get into trouble with their cell phones are the ones with one hand on the wheel and the other jamming their cell phone to the side of their head. Having a conversation while driving isn't much different, safety-wise, whether it's on a hands-free cellular phone or with a passenger sitting next to you. I might argue that hands free is actually safer than driving with that passenger, since you won't be tempted to look over at them while you're talking and a cell phone can't grab the wheel. So if safety is your concern, we'd best ban passengers as well since they can also distract a driver.

      I get as irritated as anyone at people that don't drive safely around me, but the problem isn't the phone it's the driver. If your brain isn't capable of proper prioritization you shouldn't be driving a car in the first place, cell phone or not. You sound a lot like people that want to ban smoking (taking away the freedom smokers have to kill themselves slowly by their own hand) just because it personally offends you. Well, sometimes I like to make a phone call in my car: I put on my headset and I drive as safely as I would be without it, and I resent your presumption that I'm automatically a threat.

      If you want to address the problem rationally rather via blind distaste, insist that drivers be trained well and not be granted a license to kil^h^h^hdrive without knowing what the hell they're doing. Most states will give driver's licenses to people that shouldn't allowed anywhere near a steering wheel, guaranteeing that significant numbers of vehicles are nothing more than badly-guided missiles waiting to commit murder. Granted, cell phone use can make a poorly-trained driver behave even more dangerously, but cell phones aren't the root of the problem.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    46. Re:Why car drivers suck by TrekCycling · · Score: 1

      Nevermind the whole "you don't buy gas, so you don't pay for this road" argument. But, um.... my taxes DO pay for the roads and I don't do a bit of damage or wear and tear to them. And yet I'm treated like a second class citizen and subjected constantly to the threat of vehicle manslaughter?

    47. Re:Why car drivers suck by larsl · · Score: 1

      Cyclists have a right to the road, it's a basic part of the common law that the United States inherited from Britain. Taking your multi-ton motorized vehicle on the road is not a right, but is permitted in some cases through licensing.

      Your car is perfectly capable of traveling at 18 mph with the rest of us. Learn to love it.

    48. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with the rest of your points, but this is downright wrong. Riding on the footpath dramatically increases the chance of being killed.

      Plus, in many places it's illegal.

    49. Re:Why car drivers suck by scotch · · Score: 1
      Question: what do you call someone who advocates violence or disrespect for a class of people based on the poor actions of a minority of members of that class?

      Answer: a racist, bigot, jerk, and/or asshole, dependending on the identity of the class.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    50. Re:Why car drivers suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    51. Re:Why car drivers suck by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Florida is a shithole for cycling. It has a poorly developed low density road network that it biased toward high speed roads to get cars quickly through the undeveloped areas. Throw in the legions of retirees barely able to see over the dashboard and you have a recipe for dangerous mayhem. While the US car culture can be opressive throughout the country, Florida is the among the worst.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    52. Re:Why car drivers suck by njh · · Score: 1

      I suggest you read this website:
      http://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/index.htm
      (ironically he was killed by a drunk driver, so perhaps his approach isn't perfect)

      I get the feeling from your post that you've never seriously ridden a bike for commuting. After reading that site and trying it out for a few years I've found that what he says is pretty much the truth for cycling. If you can identify issues with the vehicular driving article, please do flag them as NPOV!

    53. Re:Why car drivers suck by tinkerghost · · Score: 1

      I've actually had drivers twitch twords me as they pass. You can see them laughing as they drive away.

  42. A charity in his name. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It would be most delightful if the Wikipedia folks and the FreeNode folks were to get together and create a charity in his name. The charity could help support research into helping those who have suffered severe cranial trauma. If all of the Wikipedia and FreeNode users were to donate a small sum to this foundation, it could be the beginning of a program that could potentially help many victims of such injuries.

  43. Re:Who hit him? by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WTF?

    I don't see any informations on the circumstances of the accident, nor what happened to the car's driver. For all we know it could've been a mechanical issue with the car, or the driver didn't pay enough attention and is in jail, or anything.

    I know this is slashdot, but how about not being stupid and judgemental just for once?

    --
    "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  44. What he had to say about himself on Wiki. by twitter · · Score: 4, Informative

    User Rob Levin.

    As the cars get bigger, bike riding is scarier but remains my only convenient daily exercise.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  45. Re:Who hit him? by bsane · · Score: 1

    Or the fault of the cyclist... It happens sometimes.

  46. RIP Rob. by TwoTailedFox · · Score: 0, Funny

    You've now gone to Admin the IRC Server in the Sky.

    Kickban Timothy Mcveigh for me.

    --
    ~The TwoTailedFox posts again....
  47. Condolences by rdoger6424 · · Score: 1

    My condolences go out to his family. Unfortunately, it appears that he was not wearing a helmet while riding his bicycle. I wonder if a charity for bicycle safety will start in his name

    --
    "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    1. Re:Condolences by T(V)oney · · Score: 1

      If that is indeed that case, that he wasn't wearing a helmet, it would be truly insulting to the man and his memory for us not to learn a valuable lesson from this tragedy. The vast majority of drivers are idiots, and you need all the safety measures you can (practically) pile on to protect yourself. Helmets can be the difference between life and death, and a minor inconvenience and a bit of discomfort is a small price to pay for your continued existence.

      Here's to you, Rob, for being a cool dude and fostering a great community.

    2. Re:Condolences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Research shows that vehicles pass cyclists by an average of three inches less when the cyclist is wearing a helmet. There is also no agreement on whether helmets increase or decrease head injuries...in some accidents they increase head injuries and in others they decrease them.

    3. Re:Condolences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Helmets make ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE once the energy involved in the collision has more kinetic energy than that involved in a simple stationary fall (no forward velocity). In fact they may cause damage due to the fact that they increase the radius of the head and thus the leverage on the the neck. Stop blaming the victim, read the actual evidence about helmets http://www.cyclehelmets.org/

      Thank you.

    4. Re:Condolences by troon · · Score: 1

      Oh please, no. Bicycle helmets have no proven beneficial effect in accidents involving motor vehicles, and can actually be detrimental due to increased risk of rotational injury.

      Bike helmets are only any good if you fall off at low speed. The energies involved in motor vehicle accidents are far greater than they are designed to absorb.

      See cyclehelmets.org for real data on the situation.

      The only thing worht setting up would be a road safety education initiative for motorists, although I've seen plenty of cyclists that could use a bit of this, too!

      --
      Ydco co ,df C erb-y go. a Ekrpat t.fxrapev
  48. ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironic that he wasn't wearing a helmet and died of head injuries. BTW, your professor was in the UK when he did the study, not the US.

    1. Re:ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, I don't think you understand what irony is. It would have been ironic if he wore a helmet and because of that he got head injuries.

      It makes sense that he died of head injuries if he wasn't wearing a helmet.

  49. God Bless Rob by peterfa · · Score: 1

    May Rob smile down on us from Heaven.
    While Rob may be gone, Freenode will live on. Of course, Freenode won't be the same, but we will get by. He was the most thoughtful admins I have ever known.

  50. Sad Day by dammy · · Score: 1

    Sad day for his survivors and a sad day for Freenode. He will be missed.

  51. The cemeteries are full of indispensable people. by imbaczek · · Score: 1

    But their deeds shall not be forgotten.

  52. requiescat in pace by Isaac-Lew · · Score: 1

    I spoke to lilo several times a few years ago, just around the time freenode started. My condolences to his family.

  53. lilo gone by hebertrich · · Score: 1

    almost everyone had a chance to converse
    with him in various circumstances.
    he will be missed.
    goodbye old chap ..

  54. And what does this teach us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    For biker fans like myself: ALLWAYS wear an helmet! It isn't "cool" not to wear one when riding a bike, its plain out stupid. I know this sounds harsh, but after I read that he never bothered to put on an helmet I think different about this whole accident. However, despite my attitude regards to that I do wish his family strength and wisdom.

  55. Roads more than drivers by Infonaut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not just the drivers. Many roads seem to have been created with no real thought for cyclists. While this is particularly true in big cities (like SF, where the roads are insane for anyone traveling on them), even nice crunchy places like Santa Cruz make bicycle commuting a risky proposition, because they don't see cyclist-friendly roads to be a high enough priority. I can't tell you how many times I've nearly been annihilated because on-street parking forces me almost into the auto lane. Potholes, poorly-designed merge and exit lanes, and fast traffic signals turn a ride to work into a dangerous proposition.

    Until there are more people commuting in bikes rather than cars, I don't see the situation changing for the better.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Roads more than drivers by jesterzog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Until there are more people commuting in bikes rather than cars, I don't see the situation changing for the better.

      I don't think it takes more people on bikes than in cars to change things -- there are plenty of places around the world where lots of consideration is given to people on bikes, both by the majority of drivers and by city planning authorities, and it's not because there are more people riding bikes than driving cars. It does help to have a little recognition and help from local governments, however.

      This is (for the most part) true in New Zealand, where I live. There used to be a lot less bikes here. What it took to change was a realisation for a lot of people that cycling was a preferable way to commute, and then city planning authorities (who agreed) nudged it by re-designing many areas with cyclists in mind. Once that's in place, it's much easier for more people to take up cycling.

      Of course, this is New Zealand. We have highly taxed petrol, reasonable public transport systems in the largest of the main centres, and maybe there's quite a different culture here compared with parts of the USA when it comes to things like walking and exercise. I haven't been there, so it's hard to tell.

    2. Re:Roads more than drivers by archen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And not just cyclists, but anyone not in a car in general. I had to walk to work after my car was in the shop for a week and took the bus. After getting off the bus I was actually sort of surprised to find that there were no sidewalks in one section of town - a newer part I might add. Fun stuff walking on the street waiting for someone to wheel around the corner in an SUV and kill you...

    3. Re:Roads more than drivers by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Sounds like yet another reason New Zealand is high on my list of places I'd consider moving to. It helps, though, that your weather (at least around Auckland, Napier Bay, etc. is relatively temperate, without the scorching hot, humid summers and frosty winters of many areas in the U.S., which means bike-riding is more tolerable more of the year.

      I also think it does require a certain number of avid bikers. If I could get more places safely on a bike, I would, but I can't, so I drive, adding yet another car to the bikers' hazards.

      I think we're also spread out more in the U.S., making biking less practical in terms of time.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    4. Re:Roads more than drivers by oneski · · Score: 1
      by re-designing many areas with cyclists in mind

      If you're talking about that bike track they built along side the North Western motorway you still have to dice with death every day to get there.

      After having been knocked off my bike by a motorist once and having plenty of close shaves where I've had to stop and calm down before continuing, I get the impression the drivers here in NZ would much rather kill or seriously injure a cyclist than get somewhere 20 seconds later.

    5. Re:Roads more than drivers by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      What pisses me off is the dumbass law in this country (and no doubt some others) that, if there's no cycle lane, riders must use the road instead of the pavement. To my mind that is utterly stupid. Everyone's safer if they use the pavement. Bikers can much more easily avoid pedestrians (as long as it's not very busy, of course) than car drivers bikers.

    6. Re:Roads more than drivers by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1
      Sorry, the facts say you're wrong. The sidewalk has been shown to be more unsafe than the road in every traffic safety survey in the history of the world. That's because cars don't expect objects on the sidewalk to move faster than pedestrian speed. Splat.

      Check the book Effective Cycling by John Forrester, for details.

    7. Re:Roads more than drivers by larsl · · Score: 1

      It's not the autolane, it's the lane. You're allowed to ride your bike there to stay clear of the parked cars.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taking_the_lane

      Here's the relevant bit of the California-specific vehicle code:
      http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21202.htm

    8. Re:Roads more than drivers by jonbrewer · · Score: 1

      This is (for the most part) true in New Zealand, where I live. There used to be a lot less bikes here. What it took to change was a realisation for a lot of people that cycling was a preferable way to commute, and then city planning authorities (who agreed) nudged it by re-designing many areas with cyclists in mind. Once that's in place, it's much easier for more people to take up cycling.

      I'd disagree. I bought a bike around a month after I moved to Wellington in 2003. It took only a few trips through the city before I decided it was complete insanity to bike the streets here. This is after moving from Boston, where I biked to work through Brighton to Cambridge for a few years. The streets in Wellington are narrower, the cars faster, and the drivers are far less skilled.

    9. Re:Roads more than drivers by jesterzog · · Score: 1

      If you're talking about that bike track they built along side the North Western motorway you still have to dice with death every day to get there.

      Yeah, I'd be first to agree that it's not perfect, but it's definitely better than it was even a decade ago. There's the whole thing if the more cyclists there are, the more people there are who have a some respect for other cyclists (even when they're driving). There are definitely more people taking up cycling, and I think the messages are getting out a bit more.

      I'm in Wellington myself, and perhaps it's a bit better here than it is in Auckland. (It's probably more compact and somewhat easier to get around without a car, for starters.) Even then, however, there are some cycle lanes here that leave a bit to be desired. (eg. SH2 between central Wellington and Petone has quite a good cycle lane which is barricaded off to one side, until the final 400 metres when the barricade disappears for some reason and it re-joins the road in what's probably one of the more risky places to be on the side of the road near high-speed traffic.

      On the other hand, there's actually recognition by local authorities that cyclists exist, even to the point where they promote it, and it's considered a viable alternative to driving by a lot of people. In the above case that I mentioned, I don't think it'll be too long before the problem gets fixed, simply because having spent so much effort on the cycle lane in the first place indicates that there's actually an initiative there for cyclists.

    10. Re:Roads more than drivers by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      What a terrible wikipedia article. It's completely non-encyclopedic, and very biased. It doesn't even point out that the vast majority of people do not accept this philosophy, and do not want bikes going 5mph blocking their roads.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    11. Re:Roads more than drivers by larsl · · Score: 1

      What philosphy? It's legal to ride a bike in traffic. If the lane is wide the law requires that cyclists stay to the right. If the lane isn't wide enough to safely share between a bicycle and a truck then the cyclist is legally allowed to ride in the middle to assert his presence.

  56. What, no jokes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, when people make jokes about September 11 it is "dealing with the situation" or whatever. When people make jokes about this guy they are just trolling. Granted the few jokes made are bad taste at best, but so were many of the September 11 jokes.

    Too bad he wasn't taking performance enhancing drugs.
    Did anybody remember to delete all his child porn?

    Personally, I liked grub better anyway.

  57. Helmets & Accidents by resistant · · Score: 1

    Not to be too off-topic, I ran into a truck on a bicycle some years ago, on a long, straight road in the summer, with the dark brown UPS truck parked partly on the road in the shade, at noon, under a brown-leaved tree with brown vegetation all around in a boring, rather featureless landscape. Were it not for the helmet, I'd have suffered more than just a mild concussion that knocked me unconscious for apparently twenty minutes. Yes, I was a damn fool who should have paid more attention to the road on that day instead of fiddling with a bag I had been carrying from a handlebar, but the lesson holds for all bicyclists under all circumstances.

    It is to be hoped that Mr. Levin had been wearing a helmet. In any case, this death was tragic. :(

    I guess the point of this post is just to remind you that if you ride a bicycle, please do wear a helmet, no matter how annoying you may find it at first. A decent helmet is not expensive, will allow good air circulation, and becomes second nature after a while. Even if you're struck by a car, the helmet might make the difference between permanent head injury or full recovery.

    --
    A truly excellent pizza parlor is a delight unto the heavens. Treasure the sauce and the toppings!
    1. Re:Helmets & Accidents by TheViewFromTheGround · · Score: 1

      hile I largely agree with your point about helmets, I was really surprised to see this research, which showed that drivers in the study drove closer to the cyclist and generally increased the likelihood of a collision when the cyclist was wearing a helmet. This could have some safety implications in an high-density urban environment, where a cost/benefit analysis needs to be made that looks at the safety tradeoffs. Particularly because helmets are really necessarily all that good at helping in a collision with a moving vehicle, and become significantly less effective at higher speeds (I often hit 22mph for short periods in my daily commute, even in heavy traffic)

      To get back on topic, I'm deeply saddened to learn of Mr. Levin's death -- Freenode is a fantastic resource.

      --
      Online citizen journalism from the inner city: The View From The Ground
    2. Re:Helmets & Accidents by shaldannon · · Score: 1
      According to #freenode-announce, he wasn't wearing a helmet when he was hit. According to my logs (times in EST (US)):
      18:10 <+christel> "was lilo wearing a helmet and was the car driver responsible? if they are responsible will they be charged?" 18:10 <+christel> lilo was not wearing a helmet, we are unsure at this point about what will happen wrt the driver of the car
      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
  58. Tragic but.... by pugdk · · Score: 1

    Sure is always tragic when someone dies and in lilo's case I'm sure its a great loss as I have the feeling he did do great things and meant well.

    On the other hand I can now finally remove my lilo ignore on freenode as he won't be able to do those nasty irritating broadcasts (or whatever they are called) again.

    1. Re:Tragic but.... by SaDan · · Score: 1

      You do realize that SOMEONE will be making those broadcasts, as they are generally used to notify users of impending/existing server/network issues.

  59. Re:Passed? ... obscure meaning by pbhj · · Score: 1

    I have to say that this also creates an obscure title (for those not familiar with US euphemism).

    I thought it was referring to some sort of network bootstrapping using freenode. You soon realise the error, but then why have a title. "Died" is surely not offensive?

  60. maybe if you had read the study by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's ironic that the car was NOT farther away as suggested by the study, but actually close enough to hit him.

  61. "passes" what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where are the editors?

    He passes? passes the salt? passes wind?

    the phrase I believe should be "passes away".

  62. Actually, there are more bikes. by lullabud · · Score: 1

    The bicycle, not the automobile, is the most popular vehicle in the world. http://www.princeton.edu/~ina/maps/transportation. html

    1. Re:Actually, there are more bikes. by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1
      The bicycle, not the automobile, is the most popular vehicle in the world.

      Well, obviously he meant that the bicycle is the most popular vehicle in the world in America.

      Duh.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    2. Re:Actually, there are more bikes. by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's not the most popular, it's the cheapest. I'm sure those millions of peasants cycling through monsoons in China wish they had a car.

    3. Re:Actually, there are more bikes. by scotch · · Score: 1

      +1 to parent for not knowing what the word "popular" means!

      --
      XML causes global warming.
  63. Re:Who hit him? by nacturation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who's with me?

    I hope the police are, so they can arrest you. What's missing in all of this are the details. Maybe Rob went down an embankment that was too steep and his brakes failed, causing him to veer into oncoming traffic causing an unavoidable accident for the unfortunate motorist who happened to be there. Perhaps Rob wasn't wearing a bicycle helmet, further complicating any head trauma. Maybe he was wearing dark clothing and cycling at night without any lights or reflective gear.

    It's amazing that we live in an age where we have access to computers and, through that, to some of the world's best accumulated wisdom and knowledge. And yet there are still some shits like you who want to pick up the pitchforks and torches to arrange a lynch mob even when you likely don't possess any detailed information on the circumstances. But even if you were there and know everything firsthand, I still find your reaction a little too stuck in the dark ages.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  64. He is still logged in by mrkitty · · Score: 0, Redundant

    lilo is i=levin@freenode/staff/pdpc.levin * Rob Levin
    lilo using irc.freenode.net http://freenode.net/
    lilo is away: Whoops, I've stepped away. For URGENT freenode help (channel flooding, trolling users, network problems or access issues), please email my pager at 4iiygyvs@freenode.net . It's my job and I'm happy to respond. For ROUTINE issues, please see http://freenode.net/faq.shtml#gettinghelp .... Please take a look at my personal blog when you get a chance: http://spinhome.org/ .... Thanks!
    lilo is identified to services
    lilo End of /WHOIS list. :/

    --
    Believe me, if I started murdering people, there would be none of you left.
  65. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't agree with the call for vengeance, but, WTF?

    That bullshit you wrote has to be one of the worst pieces of crap I've ever had the misfortune to read.

    Have you ever thought that perhaps if someone kills another person that life SHOULD be hard for them? All too often, people who do stuff like this (whether by accident or negligence or malice) have so little empathy for other people that a few months down the track they are living life just as they always did.

    I really hope they throw the book at the idiot who caused this.

  66. Crossing the Bar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sunset and evening star,
    And one clear call for me!
    And may there be no moaning of the bar,
    When I put out to sea,

    But such a tide as moving seems asleep,
    Too full for sound and foam,
    When that which drew from out the boundless deep
    Turns again home.

    Twilight and evening bell,
    And after that the dark!
    And may there be no sadness of farewell,
    When I embark;

    For tho' from out our bourne of Time and Place
    The flood may bear me far,
    I hope to see my Pilot face to face
    When I have crossed the bar.

    1. Re:Crossing the Bar by cdn-programmer · · Score: 1

      Missing attribution. Does this mean copyright infringment? Sheesh... at least he could have said Tennyson wrote it!

  67. Re:The cemeteries are full of indispensable people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exactly was indispensible about lilo?

  68. Gas Prices by lullabud · · Score: 1

    As gas prices rise I have hope that bicycling will get increasing positive attention from people who would otherwise not have considered us cyclists.

  69. Re:(Older) local article by ForumTroll · · Score: 2, Informative
    Christel was asked about that article in #freenode-announce and that article is not about lilo. Here's the relevant log:

    18:47 < dungodung> http://www.khou.com/news/local/crime/stories/khou0 60911_ac_bikeauto.8af6ff6f.html
    18:47 <+christel> dungodung: that is not lilo
    18:49 <+nalioth> that news article is NOT about lilo

    RIP lilo. You will be missed and I wish your family all the best.
    --
    "A Lisp programmer knows the value of everything, but the cost of nothing." - Alan Perlis
  70. Critical Mass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many of us only knew Rob from his "global announcements" on IRC, but still he will be sorely missed. I only hope his death does not discourage cyclists. The more people cycling, the safer it is for cyclists.

    I will be supporting lilo and cyclists everywhere by attending Critical Mass to make it safer for cyclists. I encourage all slashdotters and freenoders to seek out and attend their own local Critical Mass (organised by YOU).

  71. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Normally I would say you are overreacting, but according to the article I read it was a hit-and-run accident. As far as I'm concerned, the driver deserves life in prison, minimum. If not a rotting box six feet under.

  72. Dead friend signed on IRC by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1

    I had a friend who died at a young age from a terminal disease, he was in his early 20's.

    His IRC client stayed signed on for about 6 months. Everyone knew he was dead, but we kept him oped in the channel. It was a bit freaky, but it was good having him around in spirit.

    Not sure what happened, I guess his shell account was deactivated... and his client was gone.

    --
    SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
  73. Freenode just won't be the same by QuantumFTL · · Score: 1

    I, like many thousands, have had the pleasure of working with Rob. I used to run #maestro to support software I co-authored at JPL, and thanks to Rob taking care of numerous problems, the support channel works beautifully, finally evolving into what is now #space.

    I know our channel would not have been a success without Rob's patience and wisdom, and I enjoyed several really great discussions with the man. I had always been hoping to take him out for a beer someday... guess we should do things like that sooner rather than later.

    Rob really believed in the work he was doing, and I think that that has really showed because freenode, while not perfect, is still a very productive place for develoment and support of FOSS. I hope that his dreams continue on long after today, I know that is what he would have wanted. We're going to miss you, Rob.

  74. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It was a hit-and-run, you insensitive clod.

  75. RIP by AlXtreme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Thanks lilo for your work on freenode, you made many open source projects possible and brought together thousands of people. My condolances go out to his friends and relatives, I feel sorry for your loss.

    --
    This sig is intentionally left blank
  76. HIt-and-run? by Suzuran · · Score: 1

    I hope the perpetrator is found, and forced to live the remainder of their life with the shame of being a murderer and a coward.
    Fleeing the scene is detestable. Death is too easy for this one.

    1. Re:HIt-and-run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A murderer? It was likely an accident.

      A coward? It may seem cowardly to you, but an accident like that would be one of the scariest things to happen to a person. It would certainly not impossible for someone to be charged with murder (especially with people like you on the jury), and imagine what the driver could be thinking about happening to him for it. He shouldn't have fled the scene, but you shouldn't be so quick to judge him.

    2. Re:HIt-and-run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The accident was not necessarily the driver's fault. But there is no excuse for leaving the scene if you know (or suspect) that you have hit someone.

      I witnessed a hit-and-run of a pedestrian. It was pretty disturbing to see the driver slow down, and then decided to speed off, leaving a broken body behind him on the side of the road. Fortunately the guy did survive. And I managed to get the license plate number.

    3. Re:HIt-and-run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea, nothing like compounding a vehicular manslaughter charge with a fleeing the scene of a crime.

      Sorry, but we live in an era where idiots will collide head on with someone, get them stuck in the car's windshield, DRIVE HOME, and let them die in the garage at the driver's house.

      http://www.snopes.com/horrors/gruesome/bargrill.as p The bulleted list, not the initial comment...

      Personally, I think a nice, justified punishment for these idiots is to make them watch as their car is crushed into a cube, without reimbursement, of course. Then they get sent to prison...

    4. Re:HIt-and-run? by Suzuran · · Score: 1

      I'm quick to judge? The very definition of cowardice is "A lack of courage or resolution". This person lacked the courage to face the results of their actions and so they fled. That's the dictionary definition of a coward.

      The act of needlessly killing someone, intentionally or not, is murder. If I am playing with a firearm and I fire the weapon through the wall of my apartment and kill someone on the other side, I will be charged with murder, and become the subject of many news stories condemning the ownership of firearms and much public outcry. But in this case, some innocent bicyclist gets run down by a car, and everyone wants to consider the criminal's point of view. It doesn't matter whether or not I planned to kill the person, I still killed them. There is self-defense and there is murder. One of these things is not like the other...

    5. Re:HIt-and-run? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but we live in an era where idiots will collide head on with someone, get them stuck in the car's windshield, DRIVE HOME, and let them die in the garage at the driver's house.

      Seriously, turn off the C.S.I.

    6. Re:HIt-and-run? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could follow the link instead of jumping to conclusions. Search up the AP news articles based on it. They exist. Someone's freaking in jail for it, search that up.

      Fact is stranger than fiction...

    7. Re:HIt-and-run? by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Seriously, turn off the C.S.I.

      In this case, art imitated life:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chante_Mallard

    8. Re:HIt-and-run? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Wow. I stand corrected.

      Is anyone else unsurprised that she was a Texan?

  77. More Bike Tips by lullabud · · Score: 2, Informative

    We're not all cyclists, I know, but we're all geeks, we all use the roads, and of course nobody likes to see comrades die under any circumstances. I thought it would be appropriate to point out some cycling related tips to go along with the parent's "always wear a helmet" statement.

    USE LIGHTS: Lights on your bike are to BE SEEN, even in daylight. Use them front and back, flashing. Many drivers subconsciously associate flashing lights with cars, and hence they will factor you into their driving logic, which in some cases means they'll notice you at all when they otherwise wouldn't have.

    Back Roads: One thing about biking is that you can take back roads which are more direct but have slower speed limits, since you won't be hitting that 50mph expressway speed limit anyways. This puts you around far fewer cars which are also going slower, and often in neighborhoods where people are more aware things other than cars. I know two great sites to find bike routes: www.bikely.com and www.motionbased.com

    Use Mirrors: There are a variety of mirrors, mostly cheap. You want a mirror which lets you see behind you without moving your head so that you don't swerve, even slightly, while glancing. One popular mirror which can be purchased off eBay for very ~$23 is the Italian Racing Mirror which mounts on end of the drop handlebars of a road bike.

    Know the Rules of the Road: Other people in this thread have pointed out that it doesn't require a license to ride a bike in the street. All of us, even we cyclists, have been pissed off by somebody on a bike who was doing something stupid. The laws may be different in each state, but sensibility isn't. If you ride a bicycle, or drive a car, take even just a minute to skim over this link: CHP - Bicycle Riding. (I include drivers too because they probably don't know that "Bicycle riders and automobile drivers follow the same rules and have the same rights.")

    Of course, this being the internet, there are plenty great resources to find information about cycling related stuff, including commuting, safety, etc.. bikeforums.net is a fantastic place to start.

    1. Re:More Bike Tips by dargaud · · Score: 1
      USE LIGHTS: Lights on your bike are to BE SEEN, even in daylight
      Bike lights are next to useless at night, useless in a city at night (any secondary reflection of a shop light will get noticed 100 times better) and just plain invisible and a waste in daylight.

      Personally I find mirrors on bikes annoying. Back road advice is the best. Another thing of note is that in many european countries, in case of bike/car collision, the car driver is automatically guilty. It may seem unfair, but it's no different than the right of way for boats. And it forces drivers to pay more attention.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    2. Re:More Bike Tips by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Bike lights are next to useless at night, useless in a city at night (any secondary reflection of a shop light will get noticed 100 times better) and just plain invisible and a waste in daylight.

      I'm not sure what kind of lights you are using, but flashing LED lights are very visible.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    3. Re:More Bike Tips by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1
      in case of bike/car collision, the car driver is automatically guilty

      Hmm, I wonder what the risk-return ratio is, and whether I should go visit Europe and start maliciously running into cars on my bike and living off the proceeds of lawsuits?

    4. Re:More Bike Tips by hanwen · · Score: 1
      in case of bike/car collision, the car driver is automatically guilty

      Hmm, I wonder what the risk-return ratio is, and whether I should go visit Europe and start maliciously running into cars on my bike and living off the proceeds of lawsuits?

      they're not automatically guilty for US-style emotional damage lawsuits (which are not very common in Europe either), but rather for material damages, and the hospital bill. If you would try to sue a car driver for emotional damage or lost productivity after an accident, you would be told off by the judge.

      It's like this because cyclist and pedestrians don't have a liability insurance for traffic accidents, so they are troublesome to have insurance disputes with.

      --

      Han-Wen Nienhuys -- LilyPond

    5. Re:More Bike Tips by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Bike lights are next to useless at night, useless in a city at night (any secondary reflection of a shop light will get noticed 100 times better) and just plain invisible and a waste in daylight.

      However, in many places they're legally required. Here the cops occasionally have a blitz and charge cyclists riding at night without lights. And you would be in a poorer legal position if there was an accident. Besides, I use sidestreets, parks, as much as possible, and there headlights really are necessary.

    6. Re:More Bike Tips by stric · · Score: 1

      Also illegal in some countries. Flashing lights are for vehicles like police and ambulance, they draw too much unconscious attention to them which can cause you to not notice other things in the traffic. (For comparison, try reading text on a web site with a flashing ad banner next to it)

    7. Re:More Bike Tips by PeterBrett · · Score: 1
      USE LIGHTS: Lights on your bike are to BE SEEN, even in daylight. Use them front and back, flashing. Many drivers subconsciously associate flashing lights with cars, and hence they will factor you into their driving logic, which in some cases means they'll notice you at all when they otherwise wouldn't have.

      True. However, at night it's a really good idea (and in fact law in the UK) to have at least one constant light at the front and back. Flashing lights screw with a human's distance perception at night.

    8. Re:More Bike Tips by evvk · · Score: 1

      Not everywhere in Europe. In Finland, the bicyclist is the guilty party, even when you slip on the icy streets in the winter and a car behind your drives over you, not keeping enough distance. And yet they don't let you use the sidewalks, where bicycles would really belong, after cars have devoured all the streets. Bicycles are also discriminated against on multi-use paths; the motorists are supposed to let pedestrians to cross the road, but not bicyclists. In many ways, Finland is close to America than (central) Europe, being very sparsely populated. The car is the king here, everyone else beware.

    9. Re:More Bike Tips by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I should have added this: at night wear a reflective jacket of the kind they wear in construction, those are highly visible. They can be found in professional clothing stores. Even blinking LEDs are not that visible at night when you are driving in a car, particularly in a city where you have so much parasite light (neon advertisement) and reflections.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    10. Re:More Bike Tips by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Other good tips:

      * Never overtake a car on the right. Drivers don't expect it and you can find yourself in trouble if they decide to make a right-hand turn.

      * Always pay attention. It seems self-explanatory, but it's very easy to settle into a rhythm and let your mind wander. This is a great way to get in an accident if an idiot driver suddenly pulls out in front of you.

      * Above all, *be predictable*. Bicycles are very light and agile, so it can be very tempting to make sudden moves. Don't do it! You can also assist drivers by signaling turns and lane changes where appropriate.

    11. Re:More Bike Tips by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Bike lights are next to useless at night, useless in a city at night (any secondary reflection of a shop light will get noticed 100 times better) and just plain invisible and a waste in daylight.

      Apparently you've never used a modern bike light. A decent LED lighting system can be *very* bright, and the movement of the bicycle makes it pretty clear that it's not a mere reflection. Combined with reflective materials, there's no reason a cyclist shouldn't be very noticeable at night.

      As for the day, I don't think anyone advocates the use of a headlight, so that's a bit of a strawman.

    12. Re:More Bike Tips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct about visibility and lighting. However you are massively and misleadingly mistaken when you assert that bike helmets are something that increases the safety of bicyclists. There is a a lot of research detailed at cyclehelmets.org which suggests that bicycle helmets are at best useless and in many cases actually harmful. You would serve yourself well to examine the data, especially in the papers that deal with the population level effects of helmet bans in Australia (controlled for a decrease in the number of cyclists due to the helmet ban, the serious head injury rate increased) and also to read exactly how much energy a helmet can absorb. Follow that up with reading about how the increased head-radius due to helmet wearing increased the leverage on the spinal cord and there's a very serious, non-kooky case to be made for not wearing helmets. Please consider this, it could save your life.

    13. Re:More Bike Tips by lullabud · · Score: 1

      You're totally right, reflectors can't be replaced by LED's in function. I guess I should've explicitly pointed that out rather than expecting people to read the legal requirement for at least 4 different locations for reflectors in the link I included. However, I also expected people to be more constructive and add to my post rather than tear me down for leaving out valid details. I must have forgotten this is cynical, flaming slashdot.

    14. Re:More Bike Tips by dargaud · · Score: 1
      I also expected people to be more constructive and add to my post rather than tear me down for leaving out valid details. I must have forgotten this is cynical, flaming slashdot
      Sorry, wasn't my intent. I was merely pointing out that there's no magic bullet for bike safety.
      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  78. Re:Who hit him? by bcmm · · Score: 4, Informative
    to err is human
    Granted, but this was a hit-and-run. That means that after hitting him, the driver drove off to avoid having to face the consequences, probably lengthening the time it took for help to arrive. That isn't an error, it's a deliberate, selfish attempt to get himself off the hook. I hope someone witnessed it and got the licence plate number, because IIRC the driver can go to prison for not stopping.

    BTW I don't agree with the GP, I just don't think "to err is human" applies here.
    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  79. .. and God typed ... by FIT_Entry1 · · Score: 0

    /kick #life lilo

    !

  80. temporary memorial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  81. Re:Who hit him? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    I'd rather 50 child rapists go free than one person be wrongfully arrested. That is all.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  82. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a hit and run, jackass. Even if it was lilo's "fault" it becomes the driver should still be made to suffer hell for running away from the accident.

    That and I find it damned hard to believe it's the cyclist's fault. Cycles fail safe. (Mechanical failure? Skid to a halt at the side of the road.) The chances that it's lilo's fault are so slim that we can ignore them.

    Drivers simply don't care about cyclists. This needs to be fixed, and if it takes ruining some dumbass SUV driver's life, then that's fine with me.

  83. the real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real issue at hand is that lilo made something like $16k a year and had to support a family. One has to think that if he was more well off he wouldn't be using his bike for a primary means of transportation. Also that he surely had an option to do something else with his life that paid more. Even a manager at McDonalds makes more than $16k a year.

    But he was dedicated to whatever his was doing and was willing to make a sacrifice to do what he thought had to be done. In the end he made the greatest sacrifice. He will be remembered by some but mostly forgotten by all. It really is a modern day tragedy.

  84. Yeah, you have a "right" to the road. by rantingkitten · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    With your "right" to use the road comes some responsibility -- like the responsibility to STOP at red lights and stop signs (bike riders seem to think this shit doesn't apply to them cause hey, it's just a bike!). Or the responsibility to not impede traffic flow by going 20mph slower than everyone else (yes, this is illegal, and saying "go around" doesn't cut it since it's nearly impossible on most roads, and if we try you'll gripe that we're maniacs trying to kill you). Or the responsibility to stop behind the car in front of you at red lights or other stops -- not bypass the line of cars and race your way to the front.

    You want drivers to respect your right and treat you like any other vehicle, then ACT like you're on any other vehicle. Or maybe you should accept that roads were built for cars, not your puny velocipede. I respect your right to travel using whatever means you can get your hands on or choose to employ, but not at the expense of other people's sanity and ability to get where they're going. Just because it has wheels doesn't mean it's ready for the road.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    1. Re:Yeah, you have a "right" to the road. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure about the law in the US, but here bikers are not supposed to stop at red lights and so forth. They are allowed to disregard "normal" traffic signs.

    2. Re:Yeah, you have a "right" to the road. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Or the responsibility to not impede traffic flow by going 20mph slower than everyone else (yes, this is illegal, and saying "go around" doesn't cut it since it's nearly impossible on most roads

      Tough. Obviously I wouldn't choose to ride on a narrow busy road if there was any alternative. Sometimes the only way to get from A to B is on a narrow busy road. And if there isn't room to safely pass, the only way to safely travel is to ride in the middle of a lane and prevent drivers from forcing me off the road. Generally such choke points are a few hundred yards at most. You might lose a few seconds by having to slow down for that stretch. If you don't like it, lobby for a wider road. not at the expense of other people's sanity and ability to get where they're going

      So because of your insanity, I'm not allowed to use roads? Well, at least you're honest in your reasons.

      Or maybe you should accept that roads were built for cars, not your puny velocipede.

      No, I don't. They were built with my taxes, they are built on public land. I don't care how much you paid for your car, I have a right to use public roads in my puny velocipede.

    3. Re:Yeah, you have a "right" to the road. by bsane · · Score: 1

      Tough. Obviously I wouldn't choose to ride on a narrow busy road if there was any alternative. Sometimes the only way to get from A to B is on a narrow busy road.

      Except that its illegal and dangerous to all... Some states (I expect most) have minimum speed limits, and they apply to all traffic, not just cars. Its just as dangerous to have someone riding 20-30 under the limit as it is 20-30 over the limit.

    4. Re:Yeah, you have a "right" to the road. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Some states (I expect most) have minimum speed limits

      On highways, sure. So maybe we're not talking about the same kind of roads.

    5. Re:Yeah, you have a "right" to the road. by bsane · · Score: 1

      Could be...

      I drive home on a narrow rural highway, speed limit is 55. There is a fair amount of bicycle traffic on the road. Mininum speed limit is 45mph...

    6. Re:Yeah, you have a "right" to the road. by scotch · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are very wrong, almost without exception, the only roads with minimum speed limits are freeways where bicycle riding is not permitted anyway. Reall, you're wrong.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    7. Re:Yeah, you have a "right" to the road. by bsane · · Score: 0
  85. Closure and progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had heard quite a lot about lilo. Some good things, mostly bad things. I never quite made up my mind on the character of the man. spinhome.org and other sites infuriated me, as did some of the other reports I'd read about him, but he's helped me and others more than enough times in getting to the channels / the information I needed.

    To trolls, I say, please hold your comments to yourself. To troll replies, please do not post them as it will only incite more anger. However, I don't think eulogizing him is a good idea either. By restricting posts to RIP-only material, it limits how people perceive lilo and ultimately history. Make your post in good taste and something that the world will enjoy - just like open source software.

    I remember going on OFTC and asking why it was perceived as "better" and the response was mainly "no lilo." Whether the issue of if he was helpful or not persists, I think the best thing to do is to let the organization and the community get over it (please don't take this offensively, I mean it as nicely as possible). I've had a few close friends die this year and it really is painful, but I've realized the most effective way to seek closure is to realize all that death is inevitable. That's why I'm wondering, where is PDPC going from here? Will there be a new head? What will happen to Freenode as a whole?

    There are so many questions such as: will the network transition to a more democratic system or out of respect for lilo, keep him as the head-in-spirit?

    I wish all the best to his family and to the Freenode community.

  86. Liberation of Freenode, Final Entry by diablo-d3 · · Score: 0

    I'm the guy who wrote the series of critical entries against Rob Levin. Today I have made my final entry.

    --
    Patrick "Diablo-D3" McFarland || http://AdTerrasPerAspera.com
  87. Re:Who hit him? by fotbr · · Score: 1

    By your logic, any vehicle on the road is fail safe. Car breaks? Roll to a stop at the side of the road.

    I've had the front tire on my bike blow out on me. Its not pretty, and it certaintly isn't fail-safe. Luckily for me, it wasn't on a road, it was on a bike path around a lake, so I didn't have to worry about being hit by a car.

    And while you're right that MOST drivers don't care about cyclists, there are more than a few cyclists that ALSO need an attitude adjustment -- you're on a public road, follow the laws. That means you STOP at stoplights and stopsigns. You signal before you turn. You yield when you need to. To be has cold hearted as you, this needs to be fixed, and if it takes ruining some dumbass cyclist's life, then that's fine with me.

    That said - in this case, if it was a hit and run, then hold the driver responsible for the hit and run. We have laws, and courts. We don't need lynch mobs, we have lawyers for that.

  88. Re:Who hit him? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

    Got a link to something saying (verifiably) that it was a hit-and-run?

    In any case, maybe if you weren't so dead set against CCTV cameras on busy city streets you'd have the guy's number plate. There have been 10 hit-and-run RTAs in the city where I stay, and every single one has been traced through CCTV footage. I'd say that was a net win.

  89. Does anyone know if they caught the driver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ?

    -j

  90. Such a sad day ... by MysticOne · · Score: 1

    You know, I've had many disagreements with lilo over the years with regard to my time as staff on Freenode, a PDPC board member, and with my work on WOPN/Freenode Radio a while back. While I disagreed with a lot of his views, I wouldn't ever have wished something this tragic upon him and his family. I wish his wife and his son all the best, and hope they're able to get through this tough time. Agree or disagree with the man, I don't think anyone could say his impact on the free software community was insignificant. I hope he's found peace, and can say that he'll be missed even by many of those who disagreed with him.

  91. Q&A by MadClikr · · Score: 2, Informative

    christel ok, im going to go +m for a moment
    christel and we will try answer some of the questions you've asked after a minute of silence
    christel Ok, first off, this is not a hoax
    christel Rob was riding his bike on tuesday when he was hit by a car, he has spent the last few days at the neuro trauma ICU at a local hospital
    christel where he has been in a coma
    christel the news reached us this morning that Rob passed away early today
    beu to repeat for those just joining us, this sadly is not a hoax; Rob was riding his bike on tuesday when he was hit by a car, he has spent the last few days at the neuro trauma ICU at a local hospital... news reached us this morning that Rob passed away early today
    christel Rob is survived by wife Debbie and son Benjamin
    christel and we ask that you all respect their privacy at this difficult time
    christel Robs funeral is most likely to be monday afternoon, although we have yet to get confirmation as Debs is waiting to hear from the MEs office that it can go ahead as planned
    christel and for those local, wishing to show their respects at his funeral, we ask that you email staff@freenode.net and we will try direct you as we can
    christel We will take some questions now and try answer them in channel, it would be appreciated if those with questions message beu, and we will answer on channel
    christel thank you
    christel the first question we've had is "What happens to freenode?"
    beu to answer the "who verified this?" question, members of freenode staff have been in contact with Rob's family over the past few days
    christel it is Debs wishes that freenode keeps running as close to normal as possible, and we will be working with the PDPC board to ensure that the network keeps running
    beu we are currently formulating an announcement and hope to have it online soon, in addition to an online "book of condolences"
    christel it has also been asked why lilos client is still connected
    christel i am sure you will all agree that at this point in time, we feel uncomfortable killing his client and find the mere idea rather morbid
    christel Robs nicknames will be quarantined to prevent abuse.
    christel A lot of people have asked how they can help
    christel Debs requests has been that people who knew Rob could donate to PDPC in his memory, or those wishing to make a more general contribution could give something to a bicycle safety campaign in their area.
    beu this question is cropping up a *lot*: yes, sadly rob did indeed pass away this morning, no, this is not a hoax
    christel we will also try to coordinate so that we can get some things together for Debs and Benjamin, but at this point in time she has no particular wishes in that regard. Those wishing to help his family however, are encouraged to get in touch with us per email (again staff@freenode.net) and we will try connect you with those in the area that are coordinating support.
    christel "Should lilo's fellow Jews sit shiva for 30 days as is tradition?"
    christel I am not jewish, and I dont know much about jewish traditions, so i will leave that up to each and every one of you individually
    christel "Where, as in city and state, would the funeral be?
    christel Rob lived in Houston, Texas and the funeral will be held there
    christel "was lilo wearing a helmet and was the car driver responsible? if they are responsible will they be charged?"
    christel lilo was not wearing a helmet, we are unsure at this point about what will happen wrt the driver of the car
    beu we are working on making a formal announcement on http://freenode.net/, and are currently setting up an online "book of condolences". our current eta is: soon.
    christel from what we know, it was a hit and run
    christel and the driver has not yet been found
    beu Rob passed away on the morning (texas time) of Saturday 16th 2006
    christel Any other questions?
    beu where Rob is Rob Levin, who most of us knew as lilo
    christel I am recieving a lot of priv messages, and I am afra

    --
    http://www.mostlystupid.com
  92. Re:Who hit him? by recursiv · · Score: 1

    What makes you think he was running red lights and stop signs? BTW, turns need not be turned on a bike if both hands are necessary for the safe operation of the bike. That's the legal wording in most states, I believe. I frequently find that both hands are necessary for the safe operation of my bike when approaching a corner.

    I suppose you never exceed the speed limit on public roads since you hold traffic law in such high regard?

    --
    I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
  93. Why bike riders suck by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bike riders, especially in the United States, have absolutely 0 regard for how traffic is moving around them. Trying to not run over their overly slow, lane hogging asses is rarely worth the effort. Especially when the smug cocksuckers decide to rant at you for driving on the road that your gasoline taxes mostly paid for. So you ride a bike. Big fucking deal. I hope you are as impressed as hell with yourself because nobody outside your small group of bike riding morons cares.

    Bike riders in the US also like to consider themselves to have as much right to the road as a car, but think that no traffic rules actually apply to them. Ever see a bike actually stop at a stop sign? How many have you seen zip through a red light? I would have loved to be able to get just the right jump on a green light to see some worthless cycle cunt sail over my hood and onto the pavement. Then make sure to sue him for the damage.

    1. Re:Why bike riders suck by flafish · · Score: 1

      More bike riders would get respect if:
      1) they didn't weave in and out of stopped traffic
      2) stopped at stop signs as required by law, a 4-way stop does not mean you have the right to barrel thru while a car must stop and wait for you
      3) rode in the proper direction with traffic
      4) got off and walked their bikes across like required to do, if they want to use a crosswalk
      5) paid for the use of the road as drivers of motor vehicles have to do
      6) rode in the proper location on the road
      7) had to prove they knew the rules of the road before being allowed out on the road /rant

      That said, it is sad when someone dies in a bike or motorcycle accident, both for the family of the rider and the driver, if they were not at fault.

      RIP Rob!

  94. sidewalk biking is standard in Japan by Trepidity · · Score: 1

    It works out pretty well in Japan---the roads, especially in Tokyo, are dense and covered with parked cars, like NYC, and about as good (bad) for biking as NYC. So the standard is that bikers ride on the sidewalks. It's a bit slower, since they have to go at a speed where they can avoid pedestrians, but it's significantly safer: Bike/car collisions can be fatal, while bike/pedestrian collisions rarely even cause serious injury.

    I suppose the ideal would be an Amsterdam-style network of separate roads for bikes, complete with their own traffic signals, but given a lack of infrastructure, Tokyo's solution seems more prudent than the standard U.S. solution of bikes riding on the street.

    1. Re:sidewalk biking is standard in Japan by Nexx · · Score: 1

      It (biking on sidewalks) works out pretty well in Japan---the roads, especially in Tokyo, are dense and covered with parked cars, like NYC, and about as good (bad) for biking as NYC.

      And it's just as illegal there as it is here in NYC. The difference, of course, is that it's one of those bits that are "condoned".

      I used to commute by bike when I lived in Gotanda and my employer's place was in Shinagawa; cutting across in front of Sony HQ was much quicker than going around saki on the Yamanote line, even if I accounted for crossing the Keiky tracks near Kita Shinagawa, and being on the roads at 8am was harrowing, but there's no way I can bike on the sidewalks at that hour either.

  95. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if "that idiot" turns out to be Rob?

  96. Simple by Myria · · Score: 1
    What exactly was indispensible about lilo?


    Nothing, he was replaced by grub.
    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  97. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the current system you get both. Even more than that, the different in punishment between terrible crimes and minor ones is ridiculous. People were recently sent 6 months to jail for taking fruit from a dumpster, even when the property owner said he didn't care. The same judge let horrid crimes get by.

  98. This SUV maligning has gotta stop. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know they're really unneccessary for most people, but in some places they're really helpful. I don't drive one myself, but here in New Orleans where we don't have potholes, we have concrete canyons, I often find myself wishing I had that extra clearance. I've bottomed out my car here multiple times while driving in what should be a perfectly safe manner.

  99. Re:Who hit him? by flewp · · Score: 1

    I think part of the problem drivers have with cyclists is precisely that a lot of cyclists don't follow the rules, and lack common courtesy. It seems that bicyclists seem to think they deserve special treatment on the road as well. Recently I was travelling down a main street in a car with a friend, that had major construction and was limited to one lane each way. A rather narrow lane. We get stuck behind a guy on a bicycle doing no more than 10 mph. We had no room to pass him. The result of this was my friend and I, and at least 10 other cars being held up by this inconsiderant idiot. Granted, that's one example, and not all bicyclists are like that, nor should judgement of all bicyclists be based on one experience, but that is merely one example. I can't count how many times I've been driving down the parkway, stuck behind a group of cyclists who are riding 4-5 wide, at 5-10 mph below the speed limit, taking up the entire lane with no room to pass (unless you illegally want to cross lanes into oncoming traffic), when there is a path along the parkway meant specifically for biking.

    The point is, if you're going to use the road, be it in a car or on a bicycle, obey the rules and use common courtesy. If you're unable to pedal hard enough to go the speed limit, get off the road and use the designated bike paths or use the side of the road, not the middle of the lane. And don't get pissed when I honk my horn at you because you're holding up traffic by being an idiot.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  100. It could have been Rob's fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You never know.

  101. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe you missed the part where he said "some" cyclists need to follow the rules... he wan't saying this specifically about lilo. though the helmet probably would have been a good idea and is the law in many places now...

  102. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, I laughted.

  103. here goes... by ClamIAm · · Score: 1

    Anyone remember the dilemma of "what if Linus Torvalds gets hit by a bus"? I do, and I'm sure pissed off that we wasted all our resources on one guy. Holding together a big chunk of the FOSS comms infrastructure is a very important task, and I want to tell myself that if we had only worried about lilo instead, maybe this wouldn't have happened.

    I feel a really strange disconnect about this whole event. One aspect that hits me is the fact that I've never met this guy (online or off), and I've only ever read about him online. It's really odd to think that your only knowledge of a real-life person is through second-hand ASCII flying around the net, and suddenly they're gone.

    The other aspect I feel is that of a math/computer person. We generally feel that everything has a perfect solution, and we can prevent failure by designing our systems correctly. Then something like this comes along, and it really just seems kind of strange in comparison. If only we could write an exception to handle a ton of steel hurtling at a person.

  104. Another Reason... by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Not to go outside. And there are bears out there. Out here at least. Seems like about once a day during the summer a pedestrian or biker gets hit by a car out here. The drivers of the cars have no intention of slowing down (Assuming they see the guy on the bike in the first place) and the guys on the bikes have no intention of moving over. There needs to be a lot more on the driver's test about motor vehicle interaction with bicycle traffic and bicycle interaction with motor vehicle traffic. I think that might help prevent a lot of deaths each year.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  105. We live in troubled times..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being an IRC user off and on over the years, I must say that I was shocked to find out that someone I knew from IRC was making Slashdot headlines. I go by the alias "troubled" and used to talk with lilo regularly. He was also kind enough to personally add my login information to the irc servers to cloak my account prelogin after a generous donation to PDPC.

    To all those who knew him and miss him, I wish you the best in dealing with the devastating news. Godspeed lilo, and may you install yourself as many MBR's as you can in that big mainframe in the sky!

    troubled

  106. RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We also mourn the passing of the OFTC irc network. With lilo gone, noone has any reason to move channels to them any more. Harsh but true. There are always a few bad sorts that lilo rubbed up the wrong way, and some of them had enough oomph to get certain channels shifted. I can't think of any other reason alone that would cause a move, any more.

  107. condolences by NaeRey · · Score: 1

    I've only had the luck to talk to him once, he was a simpatic guy, running an ambicious project even..
    Really sad what happened to him.
    Hopefully he went to a better place

  108. Re:rest in peace... by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    With all due respect to Rob Levin, I'm not sure he's the kind of guy Dimebag or Steve Irwin would gravitate to in a crowd...

  109. Re:Who hit him? by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

    Particularly with bicyclists who like to ride on public roads without helmets...

  110. Critical Mass (less cowardly version) by PengoNet · · Score: 2, Informative

    Many of us only knew Rob from his "global announcements" on IRC, but still he will be sorely missed. I only hope his death does not discourage cyclists. The more people cycling, the safer it is for cyclists everywhere, and the fewer sad incidents like this one.

    I will be supporting lilo and cyclists everywhere by attending Critical Mass [wikipedia.org] to make it safer for cyclists. I encourage all slashdotters and freenoders to seek out and attend their own local Critical Mass (organised by YOU).

    The next Critical Mass is Friday 29th September near you. Google it. Support cyclists.

    1. Re:Critical Mass (less cowardly version) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck Critical Mass. It has achieved absolutely nothing except to piss off a whole load of people and get a couple of bicycle ghettoes aka "bike lanes" of very short length. Critical Mass is a dead concept for sheep like retards. Get on your bike, ride every fucking day, enjoy it and stop huddling in the Critical M-aaaaaaa-aaaaa--aaaaa-sss

  111. Re:Tribute to Lilo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've made a tribute site for him:

    Why is he holding you by the neck, bitch?

  112. Will miss lilo. by ThatComputerGuy · · Score: 1

    This really sucks. Regardless of what some people think of lilo/FreeNode/PDPC, he was trying to do something that he saw as good for the community, and was genuinely a nice guy. Condolences to his family.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  113. Glorifying the dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay, i'm not going to say that i'm happy lilo is gone... but i'm incredibly surprised at all the comments in this thread.

    Thanking him for everything he's done? *What* has he done?

    He set up an IRC server for open source projects, which is great i guess, but the whole thing was only ever his own ego trip... even if you know nothing about lilo, you'd get this impression from the schitzophrenic approach to network management.
    He accepted huge amounts donations to the PDPC (consisting only of himself, BTW) for... uhh... what? Poke around on the internet, you'll find out. But it was not for the IRC network - all the servers and bandwidth are donated by host organisations like universities.

    He couldn't code, all the work on the Freenode IRCd has been done by supporting staffers. He repeatedly showed himself to be technically incompetant in so far as network management, the only reason freenode managed to grow was because it attracted other halfway competant staffers.

    His mindset was totally at odds with the coder/hacker community, as can be seen in the various network policy decisions made over the years, and hilarious flamewars with other people followed by abuse of power.
    These days, the network is practically unusable and doesn't resemble IRC at all (you need to 'register' before you can do barely anything).

    Open source projects are leaving left and right, both due to the reasons above, and/or policy issues. OFTC has always been where the people with clues have resided, and now other projects are starting to realise why.

  114. First Hacked, Now Smacked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude didn't have much luck, now, did he?

    (Bad taste, you say? Black humor appeals even to /.)

  115. Re:Who hit him? by bcmm · · Score: 1
    From #freenode-announce.

    christel "was lilo wearing a helmet and was the car driver responsible? if they are responsible will they be charged?"
    christel lilo was not wearing a helmet, we are unsure at this point about what will happen wrt the driver of the car

    christel from what we know, it was a hit and run
    christel and the driver has not yet been found

    No, it's not verifiable, although if you ask around people will agree that christel said this. It is all very sudden and I don't think anyone knows yet. I'm sure his family have better things to do right now than a) finding out what the police are doing about the driver and b) telling Freenode about it.
    BTW, I don't think I did express an opinion about CCTV. In any case, lets not discuss that here.
    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  116. typical cager mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this is a typical cager rant from a gas-spewing moron driver... these are the folks that are responsible for thousands of deaths on our highways...

    i only hope that one day you are the one riding a bike and getting buzzed by the thousand-pound monsters driven by idiots while chatting on cell phones and drinking coffee...

    just typical

  117. Re:Who hit him? by Megane · · Score: 1

    It was a hit-and-run, you insensitive clod.

    That's right. Texas state law. If you're involved in an auto accident, you stay to render aid, etc.

    --
    #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  118. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "it is even harder to live on with the knowledge of having killed someone." Idiot!
    It's only "harder" if you actually have compassion and empathy in the first place! No doubt the aggressive tosser who murdered Lilo lacks both of these qualities, and therefore WON'T be having a "harder" life because they've murdered an innocent, decent human being. No doubt they will go on to cause numerous other 'accidents' with their car. "Let the poor boy alone" = "Let the MURDERER off". It wouldn't be YOU by any chance, would it? You seem to be already working for his defence team!

  119. Die, dammit, die by Porchroof · · Score: 1

    The affected "pass" is NOT a synonym for "die".
    When told that someone passed, I immediately ask, "What did he pass? The gravy?"
    What most people are thinking of when they use "pass" for "die" is the colloquial phrase "pass away". That phrase, indeed, means "die". So use it, dammit.

    --
    Fata viam invenient.
  120. Re:Who hit him? by theonetruekeebler · · Score: 2, Informative
    We don't yet have details of the accident, except that it was a bike-car collision and the car left the scene. This is not to exhonerate the driver, of course. For all we know a bored psychopath crossed three lanes to do him in. But most likely this was a simple and tragic traffic accident.

    I was in a bus once when a bicycle plowed into us. If it handn't happened right below my window, I never would have known it happened. I'm almost positive we had the right-of-way and he somehow failed to comprehend that he was overtaking a bus that was braking, signaling a right turn and approaching a bus station on the right.

    If a bike strikes your SUV's blind spot or rear end, the car won't move at all and all you'll hear is a thump, easily drowned out by the stereo. In an especially tall vehicle (like the bus I was riding) the entire accident will happen completely out of view.

    One possible scenario: A fast-moving cyclist on a downhill run is rapidly catching up with a slow-moving SUV. As the cyclist starts overtaking on the right, the SUV suddenly turns right. The cyclist is unable to stop or swerve and his front tire hits the car's right rear tire. The bicycle is snapped violently to the side, slamming the rider's unhelmeted skull into the curb. The driver, meanwhile, has only heard a thumping sound and attributes the slight lurch of his car to irregular pavement at the edge of the road. The only damage to the SUV is a scuff on the sidewall. Or the driver later finds damage on the right side of the car and assumes some coward did hit-and-run on them in a parking lot.

    Who's at fault, the driver who failed to signal, or the cyclist who was following too closely? In my home state, leaving the scene of a fatal accident is itself a felony and is pretty damning evidence of at-fault driving. Almost certainly there were a number of contributing factors that we don't know about. That doesn't make lilo any less dead or urban cycling any less a risk.

    --
    This is not my sandwich.
  121. Re:Who hit him? by Elektroschock · · Score: 1

    So was it murder? A few years ago a car with Richard Stallman was hit...

  122. Re:Who hit him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing we do know is it was a hit-and-run, and even if it was the fault of the cyclist the car driver had a responsibility to wait with him until help arrived. I hope there is a law in Texas with a BIG penalty for this coward. I hope they find him. And I hope he gets the maximum allowable sentence.

    Lilo was in hospital for a while struggling before he died. Could he have survived if the paramedics had got to him sooner (i.e. called by the person who hit him)? Or did he lie on the side of the road for a while before someone else found him like so many other bodies that are forgotten in the name of cars?

    As a fellow cyclist I feel sick to the stomach to think the biggest danger to me is something I can't do anything about - getting hit from behind. And it makes me more sick to know there are a lot of drivers out there who would hit and run. If you read lilos blog you can see one of the reasons he was riding was because he was eminently aware of the ecological crisis cars are causing. So it's another soldier dead today in my view.

    I will not forget.

  123. He was by rasjani · · Score: 1

    Fine and Helpfull bloke. I've used many irc networks since i started to irc, back in '94 and i couldnt name a single person behind any of the networks (even thou many of my cow-orkers where ircops in IRCNet) beside Lilo. Thanks for providing the best network.

    --
    yush
  124. Re:Guys! by drsquare · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Odd how similar jokes about Steve Irwin were modded to +5.

  125. Re:Who hit him? by fotbr · · Score: 1

    Actually, no, I don't speed. I save that for the track.

    As for the rest, I was referring to SOME cyclists, not lilo specifically, since I don't know him, or what he was doing. But sadly, the cyclists that I know personally that throw fits about how bad car drivers are are the same ones that act as if they don't have to follow any of the rules of the road. I'm hoping thats not the case in general, but I've found it best to assume the worst and let people surprise me.

  126. Re:Who hit him? by fotbr · · Score: 1

    Thats exactly what the problem is, and I'd made that point in other posts, I just forgot to in this one.

    In any case, well said.

  127. Please wear a helmet by spun · · Score: 3, Informative

    18:10:08 "was lilo wearing a helmet and was the car driver responsible? if they are responsible will they be charged?"
    18:10:33 lilo was not wearing a helmet, we are unsure at this point about what will happen wrt the driver of the car


    This is not to blame lilo in any way for not wearing a helmet, but please, let's learn from what happened here. Always wear a helmet when riding a bike. The speed you are going doesn't matter, it's the distance from your head to the ground, which is the same on a bike as it is on a motorcycle. My life was probably saved once because I was wearing a helmet when I hit a pothole after coming off a long hill. Bike helmets nowadays are light-weight and not at all dorky looking.

    Again, the driver is to blame for this, not lilo. Doubly so as they fled the scene, when perhaps if they had stayed and summoned help immediately, lilo might have survived.

    Rest in peace, lilo. My condolences go out to his family.
    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Please wear a helmet by larsl · · Score: 1

      The prevalence of blame-the-victim superstition in this world is ridiculous. A bicycle helmet is designed to deal with low-speed rider-only falls. Even helmet promoters accept that they are of no use in a car-bike collision.

      Bicycle helmets save lives in the short term only by discouraging cycling altogether. Their efficacy does not extend past the prevention of roadrash. Skull-crushing forces are *way* beyond the spec.

      http://cyclehelmets.org/

    2. Re:Please wear a helmet by spun · · Score: 1

      Okay, first, I said that I was in no way blaming lilo. What a ridiculous strawman. The fact that you would bring that up shows me you are the type of sophist who will do anythign to win converts to your side of an argument, including disparaging your opponent and outright dishonesty.

      Second, although the site you linked to appears to be an anti-helmet advocacy site, it is balanced enough to admit that many studies show thatbicycle helmets are effective. Sure, it also presents counter arguments, but it as it appears to be an anti-helmet advocacy site put up by bicycle enthusiasts who do not want to see strict helmet laws enacted, I would take the number of studies presented on both sides with a grain of salt. The numbers of pro and con studies listed are problably not representative of the actual number of published studies out there.

      In addition, is there any chance you yourself (with a personal web site named bikeboom.com) are biased against the use of helmets? I don't support helmet laws, as long as people are willing to accept the risks themselves and sign something stating they will never impose upon the state for medical care if they are injured doing something foolish. But I certainly advocate for their use.

      Many helmets do not meet the high-impact safety standards, but the fact is there are helmets out there that do. Helmets today are lightweight, well ventilated and comfortable. Even if they can protect in only a small fraction of cases, isn't it worth it to wear one?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Please wear a helmet by pafrusurewa · · Score: 1

      Car drivers are much more likely to suffer serious and fatal head injuries. I sure hope you wear a helmet while driving and that you blame drivers for head injuries if they didn't wear a helmet?

      Also, please look at the funding behind the studies you linked to. Anything with the names "Rivara" and "Thompson" in them is sponsored by Bell. Guess what they produce?

      Bicycle helmets are designed to absorb energy by compressing a thin layer of styrofoam-like material. Most people who say "the helmet saved my life" report shattered helmets. In that case the helmet didn't work. It takes very little energy do crack styrofoam. All they're good for is preventing superficial bruises at best.

      You write: "Even if they can protect in only a small fraction of cases, isn't it worth it to wear one?"
      That kind of generic statement (think of the children!) can be applied to anything and everything. Showering is dangerous, very dangerous. Much more dangerous for your head than cycling and driving.

      So I answer: "Even if a shower helmet can protect in only a small fraction of cases, isn't it worth it to wear one?"
      See, that kind of argument gets you nowhere. We don't think showering is that dangerous. For a good reason, it isn't, yet it's much more dangerous than cycling.

      What it comes down to is this: Cycling is safer than driving and safer than walking. Cycling is better for your health than not cycling. Anything that discourages cycling will be detrimental for the health of the overall population. Making cycling appear more dangerous than it actually is will discourage people from cycling.

      Finally, when Australia made bicycle helmets mandatory two things happened: the number of cyclists dropped significantly (which costs society money because people don't exercise as much) and the rate of cyclist fatalities increased. Make of that what you will.

    4. Re:Please wear a helmet by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      Dude, he was hit by a car. A Magic Foam Safety Hat will do very little to alleviate that. Helmets for road cycling make about as much sense as wearing a breastplate whilst driving a car. Sure, they reduce the risk of a certain type of injury, but that type of injury is rare (the vast majority of cycling injuries are to the arms & shoulders); they also increase the risk of neck injuries, including fatalities. Moreover, the wearing of helmets discourages cycling, and the single greatest cycling safety factor is riders on the road--every region with high ridership has fewer accidents, fewer injuries & fewer fatalities.

      A recent study has shown that drivers drive significantly closer to helmeted cyclists, an average of 3 1/2 inches away.

      Research has shown that helmet wearing is correlated with fatality rates.

      Bicycle helmets are a Bad Idea.

  128. Re:Who hit him? by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Uhmm...you picture whole thing too much in black & white...
    More often than not beeing a bit "rude" on bike is the only safe way. Lack of bike paths, narrow roads/lanes (I imagine you don't experience this that much in US...) and heavy traffic in the city practically guarantee that when you use side of the road, many drivers pretend to not notice you when passing (with traffic from other side). So practically the only safe way is to drive a bit too much toward the center of the lane, so the cars will _have to_ slow down, and wait until they can pass you - at least then they're doing it with large margin for error.
    Cyclist simply learned that forcing cars behind them no stop/slow down is actually safer than playing nice...

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  129. Re:Who hit him? by nacturation · · Score: 1

    Yes, the law does have some harsh penalties for hit and run incidents and we should let the law mete out its punishment. The part I was disagreeing with is the forming of a vigilante justice lynch mob like they still do in some backwards parts of the world... sometimes even when the person is innocent.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  130. Re:Guys! by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

    That's because Steve Irwin worked with horribly dangerous animals for a living, and also essentially made jokes about himself for a living.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  131. Re:Who hit him? by dubl-u · · Score: 1

    Granted, but this was a hit-and-run. That means that after hitting him, the driver drove off to avoid having to face the consequences, probably lengthening the time it took for help to arrive. That isn't an error, it's a deliberate, selfish attempt to get himself off the hook.

    Let me be clear: I'm not condoning this, I think it was terribly wrong, and I hope the hit-and-run driver is caught and does time, no matter what the explanation. As an avid cyclist who has been hit a couple of times, I take these things pretty personally.

    However, we shouldn't be quick to judge the driver. People do crazy things in the heat of the moment. It's possible that the culprit is a perfectly nice person who had a moment of inattention followed by a moment of panic, and is now paralyzed with fear and remorse. The fight-or-flight reflex is a poweful one. It's also possible, of course, that the culprit is a sociopath who giggled on the way home. We don't know, and shouldn't assume.

    We also should be careful with our judgements for another reason: what we hope we will do in a crisis is no guarantee of what we'll actually do. A friend of mine is doing her medical residency right now, and there's a reason that new doctors spend three years practicing in punishing conditions and under close supervision. It's because when the shit comes down you need deeply established habits to fall back on. Good character and education aren't enough. Without those habits, it's a roll of the dice.

  132. You're daft. by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

    Obviously I wouldn't choose to ride on a narrow busy road if there was any alternative.

    The alternative is to get a vehicle capable of keeping up with the flow of traffic. Your pet choice doesn't give you some exalted status.

    No, I don't. They were built with my taxes, they are built on public land. I don't care how much you paid for your car, I have a right to use public roads in my puny velocipede.

    Hey! The park was built with my taxes and on public land! Does that mean I can drive my car all over it?

    No? Why not? Oh, because it wasn't built for cars?

    Well, the road wasn't built for bicycles.

    Now, whether you like it or not, as I said, with rights comes responsibility. If you cannot keep up with the flow of traffic, you are breaking the law. There is a minimum speed limit -- and not just on highways. You cannot, if you are in a car, just arbitrarily slow down to 20mph in a 45mph zone, and if you do so in front of a cop, expect to get pulled over. So why do you think that you get to do the same thing because you're on a bike?

    Keep up with traffic or get the hell off the road. Obey all traffic signs and signals, not just the ones that are convenient for you. Do not assume that because your bike can weave through cars, you're allowed to do so. Use hand signals to indicate to drivers when you're about to slow down or turn.

    These are not suggestions, these are laws. If and only if you can manage to adhere to all of them, I'll respect your right to use the road with a bike -- especially that first one. Until then, not only do you have no right to use the road, but it is patently illegal for you to do so.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    1. Re:You're daft. by larsl · · Score: 1

      Actually, the road was built for bicycles. The public movement to get the roads paved in the US in the 19th century was spearheaded by cyclists.

      I will concede that the 101 freeway that passes through Los Angeles wasn't built for bicycles, but rather for horses, donkeys, and foot-traffic. We used to call "the 101" "El Camino Real."

      Where is this minimum speed limit in the vehicle code, exactly?

      Not only can cyclists weave through cars, but we're allowed to do so in US states where lane sharing is legal (such as in California). It's much safer than riding between jammed traffic and parked cars.

      I stop at red lights and at stop signs.

    2. Re:You're daft. by MrZaius · · Score: 1

      Wow. Lots of venom in the parent.

      Note that, at least in my state, we are required to stay at the right-most edge of the lane and avoid major highways, on which non-motorized vehicles are banned. There really isn't an applicable minimum speed on any normal roads that I'm aware of, but, if there were, note that the laws in my state limit the scope of those limits to motorized vehicles capable of safely operating at such speeds.

      Illinois Rules of the Road:
      http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/publications/rul es_of_the_road/rrtoc.html

      Relevant legislation:
      http://www.winthropharbor.com/ordinance/ord_title7 _ch71.asp
        71.004 MINIMUM SPEED REGULATION.
      No person shall drive a motor vehicle at such a slow speed as to impede or block the normal and regular movement of traffic except when reduced speed is necessary for safe operation of his vehicle or in compliance with law.

      (ILCS Ch. 625, Act 5 11606(a)) Penalty, see 70.99

      (IANAL)

    3. Re:You're daft. by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      (a) Upon all roadways, any bicycle shall be driven either on a usable bicycle lane or, if a usable bicycle lane has not been provided, near the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway or upon a usable right- hand shoulder in such a manner as to prevent undue interference with the flow of traffic except when preparing for a left turn or when reasonably necessary to avoid conditions that would make it unsafe to continue along near the right-hand curb or edge. From the New York state statutes. Pretty typical (I'm in Atlanta, but for some reason I'm getting a 403 error when I try to look at Georgia statutes). What it means is that unless you are about to turn left, or there is some bizarre obstacle jutting out of the curb, you are not allowed to interfere with the flow of traffic -- period, end of story. If you cannot manage to do this because your bike is too slow, then you forfeit your right to use your bike on the road. Actually, the road was built for bicycles. The public movement to get the roads paved in the US in the 19th century was spearheaded by cyclists.

      So all the wide, multi-lane, paved roads that wend through my fair city are relics of the 19th century? Do you honestly expect me to believe this? Maybe the routes themselves are, but the infrastructure has been upgraded during the past century. These roads were not built with cyclists in mind.

      Cyclists, of course, know this, despite protestations to the contrary, and you can hear it every time one of them gets his knickers in a twist about "murderously anti-cyclist roads" and "inconsiderate drivers" and complaints of all the frost heaves and potholes -- things that barely affect cars but wreak havoc on bicycles. There's a reason nobody cares.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    4. Re:You're daft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      or when reasonably necessary to avoid conditions that would make it unsafe to continue along near the right-hand curb or edge

      Which includes lanes that are too narrow for both a car and a bicycle plus a safe passing distance. Ergo, you've just conceded his point.

    5. Re:You're daft. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      >Obviously I wouldn't choose to ride on a narrow busy road if there was any alternative.
      The alternative is to get a vehicle capable of keeping up with the flow of traffic. Your pet choice doesn't give you some exalted status.


      You're the one who wants exalted status, to tell me to get off "your" road. Sorry, no, it's not your road.

      Well, the road wasn't built for bicycles.


      Most roads were. Did they have cars in the 19th Century?

      If you cannot keep up with the flow of traffic, you are breaking the law


      Maybe on a freeway, which I don't have any desire to ride on anyway.


      Citation for this law, please.

    6. Re:You're daft. by ScrewYouTroll · · Score: 0

      You may think I'm daft, but you're so full of densely packed wrong you'd best be careful you don't collapse into a black hole of wrong. If you do so, also, please don't become a congressman; we have enough wrong there already.

      Also, screw you.

    7. Re:You're daft. by rantingkitten · · Score: 1
      You're the one who wants exalted status, to tell me to get off "your" road. Sorry, no, it's not your road

      I said "the" road, not "my" road. Sounds to me like you're reading what you want to see, not what's actually there. Which seems pretty typical of cyclists, many of whom act like they're a member of some oppressed minority group.

      Most roads were. Did they have cars in the 19th Century?

      Don't confuse "route" with "road". The "route" for the main drag of Atlanta, Peachtree Street, is quite old. But today it is a multi-lane, asphalt-paved, 45mph strip. Are you seriously suggesting that it was built this way with bicycles and horse-drawn carriages in mind?

      Citation for this law, please.

      Of course it varies from state to state, but most states, if not all, have a law that reads something like this:
      (a) Upon all roadways, any bicycle shall be driven either on a usable bicycle lane or, if a usable bicycle lane has not been provided, near the right-hand curb or edge of the roadway or upon a usable right- hand shoulder in such a manner as to prevent undue interference with the flow of traffic except when preparing for a left turn or when reasonably necessary to avoid conditions that would make it unsafe to continue along near the right-hand curb or edge.
      which means that unless there is some obstacle jutting from the curb, or you're about to turn left, you're not supposed to cause "undue interference with the flow of traffic". That's from New York state.

      Plenty of states have statutes regarding minimum posted speed limits. I'm not going to sit here and dig them up for you because you'll just counter that you're not riding your bike on roads with such a posted limit and I'll bitch that you're still impeding the flow of traffic and you'll say how is that illegal and I'll have to point out that that you're a doody head and you'll say maybe so but that's not against the law and I'll give you the finger.

      By the way, I'm also getting tired of the "my taxes paid for the road, I have as much a right to it as you!" In fact, to operate my car on the road, I have to pay a yearly fee, and that license does not transfer to any vehicle I happen to fancy -- I have to pay another fee for every car I wish to drive. When you start paying tag and registration fees for your bicycle you can come to me with your "my taxes paid for this", but until then, you're not on equal footing.
      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    8. Re:You're daft. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      I said "the" road, not "my" road. Sounds to me like you're reading what you want to see

      You said "the". But ordering me to keep off it does imply you imaginine it belongs to you.

      "or when reasonably necessary to avoid conditions that would make it unsafe"

      Those are the conditions.

      When you start paying tag and registration fees for your bicycle

      When bicycles kill as many people as cars, registration might be necessary. Otherwise it's public land, and roads are contsructed with public money. My money. And considering the minuscule amount spent on bicycle infrastructure, I don't get my money's worth.

  133. Re:Who hit him? by dubl-u · · Score: 1

    The point is, if you're going to use the road, be it in a car or on a bicycle, obey the rules and use common courtesy. If you're unable to pedal hard enough to go the speed limit, get off the road and use the designated bike paths or use the side of the road, not the middle of the lane. And don't get pissed when I honk my horn at you because you're holding up traffic by being an idiot.

    I completely agree with your first sentence, and disagree vigorously with the rest. Slower traffic, be it car or bike, should absolutely yield to let faster traffic pass. But cyclists are still traffic, and in places without good bike paths, the safest place to ride is often in the middle of the lane. Speed comes second to safety. At least in California, it's the law, and you see signs like this to remind impatient drivers of that.

  134. bikers already oversubsidize car travel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bikes don't cause wear on the roads, why should we pay for their use? We pay out of the general fund enough for their initial creation and a shitload more for your war for oil. I subsidize you assholes enough. Get over it and don't run us over.

  135. Re:Who hit him? by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    > "Recently I was travelling down a main street in a car with a friend, that had major construction and was limited to one lane each way. A rather narrow lane. We get stuck behind a guy on a bicycle doing no more than 10 mph. We had no room to pass him. The result of this was my friend and I, and at least 10 other cars being held up by this inconsiderant idiot."

    Hello, I am a lead cycling instructor for the Leauge of American Bicyclists.

    In this example, with the information you've given me, I think the cyclists was driving perfectly. I'm sorry you have to slow down in the construction zone, that must have been a real incovenience to you. I'm *sure* the cyclist wishes he didn't have to block the lane - we hate doing it, but please understand that the stakes are To The Death. Given the narrowness of the road, the main safety hazard is impatient motorists passing without safety margin on the left. Unfortunately, its not possible for a cyclist to tell by ESP which type of vehicle operator you are until you've hit him, or not. Thus the sane and safe lane position is blocking the lane, thus not tempting other vehicle operators to engage in unsafe passing behavior.

    The preliminary evidence leads me to believe that this cyclist was not an idiot, as was actually probably well-educated in vehicluar bicycling.

    I think you're blaming the wrong party. It sounds like you're angry at the cyclist. In fact you should be angry at the construction which narrowed the street to one lane, so that all vehicles must slow to the pace of the slowest vehicle. You'd be inconvenienced also if a car slowed to make a left turn, blocking the lane, but you wouldn't call that operator an idiot, nor post about that on slashdot, now, would you? Think about that for a minute before reading on...

    All transportation inconveniences other transportation. Its a fact of life. Bicycles inconvenince car operators in different ways than cars inconvenience car operators, but both forms cause inconvenience. For examples, the above mentioned left turning car ahead of you would inconvenience you. Also, when was the last time a row of bikes parked on the street blocked a lane of traffic? Probably never. But parked cars block lanes of traffic all the time. Also, on wide roads, bikes and cars can interpentrate and pass eachother. Cars can't pass cars in the same lane like that, instead they line up behind eachother, causing cascading gridlock problems.

    So have some empathy, relax, and enjoy sharing the road.

    Also, please don't honk unless a collision is imminent. It doesn't help anything. If you can't get past, ask why that is. Ask why you think you have more right to the road than the non-polluting, non parking-space-consuming bike rider? Ask how long you're _actually_ being delayed, and if the bike rider is waiting for a chance to let you through. Consider all these factors before becoming annoyed.

  136. Re:Who hit him? by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    > "As a fellow cyclist I feel sick to the stomach to think the biggest danger to me is something I can't do anything about - getting hit from behind. And it makes me more sick to know there are a lot of drivers out there who would hit and run. If you read lilos blog you can see one of the reasons he was riding was because he was eminently aware of the ecological crisis cars are causing. So it's another soldier dead today in my view."

    Good news chum! For trained cyclists riding in the proper lane position, overtaking collisions are reduced to only 0.3 percent of all bike-car collisions. (see _Effective Cycling_, John Forrester). The trick is proper lane positioning and (at night) lighting. If you're in the USA I strongly recommend taking one of the League of American Bicyclists' "Road I" classes, they cover this in detail. To find courses in your area, access the course finder at http://www.bikeleague.org/cogs/resources/findit/in dex.php , and check only the "BikeEd Courses" box.

    When I took the class I already had perhaps 10,000 urban miles under my belt. I was skeptical whether there was anything there to learn. I learned a lot. The experience of 10^10 miles of collective cyclist experience goes into those clasess.

  137. Helmet Superstition by larsl · · Score: 1

    as long as people are willing to accept the risks themselves and sign something stating they will never impose upon the state for medical care if they are injured doing something foolish.

    Riding a bicycle isn't foolish. Riding a bike in traffic is statistically safer than walking down the sidewalk. Basketball puts more people in the ER every year than cycling:
    http://bicyclinglife.com/SafetySkills/SafetyQuiz.h tm

    The dangers of cycling have been hyped by the auto insurance lobby to decrease payouts (scare people away from cycling, problem solved!) and taint juries (He was riding a *bicycle*, what did he *expect*?). They work largely through "bike advocate" professional 501c3 NGO-jockeys with no real interest or commitment to cycling. Look behind groups like Bikes Belong or the League of American Bicyclists and you will see the AAA. No joke.

    Many helmets do not meet the high-impact safety standards, but the fact is there are helmets out there that do. Helmets today are lightweight, well ventilated and comfortable. Even if they can protect in only a small fraction of cases, isn't it worth it to wear one?

    What standard are you talking about? SNELL? CPSC? Bike helmet standards in the US have been twice-downgraded since the early 1970s.

    Handwringers obsess over legions of tube-fed cycletards draining the common treasury, but economic analysis of cycling from the Wharton School shows the contrary: Cycling (with risk of accident factored in) increases longevity to such an extant that there is a real concern that longer-lived people will consume more energy by being around for extra decades to keep a fridge going and to forget to turn off the light in the garage. See:
    http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/~ulrich/publications .html

    1. Re:Helmet Superstition by spun · · Score: 1

      Jeebus cripes! You're reading way too much into what I said. Of course cycling is a net plus for society, for more than just the reasons you mentioned. But if helmets do save lives (which obviously you debate in the first place, but play along for a minute...) and you ride without a helmet, and sustain an injury which no one else can be held accountable for, shouldn't you have to pay for your medical expenses? (Given our current legal/medical system, which sucks. I do support universal medical coverage, and if such a system were enacted my point would be moot.)

      I used to ride in Critical Mass when I lived in San Francisco, during which I've been chased up onto the sidewalk and then ticketed for riding on the sidewalk by cops on motorcycles. I've done a fair bit of bike activism myself. I just happen to disagree with you that wearing a helmet is pointless.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:Helmet Superstition by larsl · · Score: 1

      Should I play along and accept your faith in bicycle helmets I'll again have to point out that bicycling is not particularly dangerous and does not create a statistically significant drain on public or private resources.

      If you want to go for the easy win, cancel the health insurance and public benefits for everyone that holds a drivers license. Auto accidents are the by-far #1 killer of young people in the United States.

      Pedestrians are statistically more likely to be killed or injured than cyclists. Should we put thumb-readers on crosswalk buttons to identify those sucklers of the public teat?

  138. You are already missed by cjcollier · · Score: 1

    Thank you for everything you did for the community in general and for me specifically. I wouldn't be involved in F/OSS the way I am were it not for your help early in my career. I'm certain the same could be said for many folks. You had a vast and overwhelmingly positive effect on the community.

    --
    moo.
  139. The truth about Rob Levin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  140. Biking by larsl · · Score: 1

    Bike lanes are often way more dangerous than riding in the street. Read:
    http://www.bikexprt.com/massfacil/cambridge/doorzo ne/laird1.htm

    Here in California the law recognizes that lots of bike lanes are substandard and can be legally ignored:
    http://www.dmv.ca.gov/pubs/vctop/d11/vc21208.htm

    As for your feelings about erratic sidewalk cycling, I'm with you. Bicycles belong out in the traffic lane.

  141. Re:Guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lol. Extra points for posting that logged in.

  142. Uh, no by larsl · · Score: 1

    The efficacy of bike helmets is strongly contested. The sidewalk is a demonstrably more dangerous place to ride than the traffic lane. People aren't out to kill you. Splitting lanes is safe and quite legal in some jurisdictions.

    I'm with you on the road signs and anti-oblivion.

  143. Three rules I wish people would follow: by Kjella · · Score: 1

    1. Pass a bike as you would a motorcycle. You would never, ever cut so close to a motorcycle even if it was going that slow. A bike at speed can't just take two steps and be out of the road like a pedestrian, in fact it the shoulder of the road can be more than bad enough.

    2. IF you bike, don't go speeding through the pedestrian crossing. Cars normally have green light to turn onto that road, and as long as you're not the bike you're not a pedestrian and don't have the right of way, at least not here in Norway.

    3. Never, ever run from the scene of an accident. The penalty for running should be equal or greater to being drunk, on drugs or whatever reason you're running. People could *die* because you run, and the right incentive is that it will always be better for you go back and help than to run.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  144. Please, MOD PARENT UP by crush · · Score: 1

    The League of American Bicyclists have put together excellent courses on the safest way to cycle based upon research done by people like Forester and John Allen.

    Reading the original post I wonder if it is a deliberate troll. My reasons for that suspicion are that the poster says that the lane was narrow. Now, according to the drivers handbooks of most states and a considerable body of case law it is not recommended to pass another road user with less than 4 feet of clearance. I would suspect that the cyclist knew that this was not possible and did not want to take the chance of a judgement-impaired driver trying to "squeeze past". I find it hard to believe that the OP would not be aware of that. Sit back dude, and relax, you won't get anywhere faster (except prison) by rushing around.

  145. It's not the network, it's the community by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 1

    Could anyone explain to me why freenode in particular has been so useful for OSS projects? I'm not saying it's a bad network, but there were hundreds of other IRC networks before freenode and still are. If it died, they could and would skip to EFNET or something. Yeah maybe it has a few netsplits, but I'm sure you could find more reliable ones if that really bothers you.

    You're right, there's nothing particularly special about the network. It's the community. It's by far the largest gathering point for people working on open source projects. Inevitably, in situations like this, people will go to the place where everyone else is because the value of the network is the highest when everyone is in the same place. It didn't have to be Freenode, but that's just the way it ended up.

  146. Re:Who hit him? by Unknown+Lamer · · Score: 1

    There is no excuse for a driver to not notice a bicycle hitting him. If a driver were that inattentive then he would be a hazard to everyone on the road and would not deserve a license.

    Oh wait, reality calls where almost everyone is like that. This is why being a cyclist is so damn dangerous (hello car making a left turn into me; I am in the intersection and perhaps you would see me if you got off of your phone and looked where you were turning).

    --

    HAL 7000, fewer features than the HAL 9000, but just as homicidal!
  147. Ugh it was a hit and run! by netrek · · Score: 1

    I hope police catch the vile murderer :( Here in the US hit-and-runs seem so common. Practically every few days on the local news I hear of one. The whole culture of driving here is messed up. People feel such entitlement and have so little regard for the safety of others. Look at the rates of drunk driving, hit and runs, etc. The courts often give offenders just a slap on the wrist. It's far too easy to get a driving license, and far too difficult to take it away. Whether it's an 85 year old who plows their SUV into a crowd a people, a reckless car load of drunk teenagers, or the 'soccer mom' with one hand on her cellphone and one on the wheel this is a huge problem.

  148. Legal but not always practical by Infonaut · · Score: 1

    What philosphy? It's legal to ride a bike in traffic. If the lane is wide the law requires that cyclists stay to the right. If the lane isn't wide enough to safely share between a bicycle and a truck then the cyclist is legally allowed to ride in the middle to assert his presence.

    It is legal, and it's usually the most effective way to stay safe, but it can be difficult to move out into a lane that is congested with cars.

    I do it frequently on certain sections of road, usually when I'm getting ready to make a left turn, but also when the bike lane is simply too narrow. Unfortunately, a lot of car drivers simply aren't paying enough attention, and they sometimes react quite viciously when a cyclist jumps into the middle of what they consider to be their lane. There is the legal, then there's the practical. It's not always practical to mix it up with the cars, particularly when drivers are pissy because of their morning commute.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  149. Oh apologies by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

    But ordering me to keep off it does imply you imaginine it belongs to you.

    You know what they say about "assume"? It makes people use trite cliches.

    Those are the conditions.

    The "conditions" being referred to in the statute are clearly not meant to include "riding the bike in general", else the statute would be meaningless. The law is that you stay as far to the right as possible and do not interfere with the flow of traffic, unless something unusual is preventing you from doing so or you are about to turn left.

    When bicycles kill as many people as cars, registration might be necessary.

    Don't be naive. Registration isn't about identification -- it's about money. If it were simply a matter of being able to ID cars in the event of a problem, then why do I need to "renew" it every year although my information, nor the car's information, has changed in five years?

    And considering the minuscule amount spent on bicycle infrastructure, I don't get my money's worth.

    I'd say you get far more than your money's worth, actually. Considering the number of people as a percentage who actually use bicycles as a primary means of transportation, which is ridiculously small, it doesn't make sense to pool everyone else's money into supporting the infrastructure for a small number of whiners who can't even be bothered to obey the laws that are already in place.
    You're complaining that there isn't enough bike infrastructure -- I have a sneaking suspicion that if the amount of money put into installing, upkeeping, and expanding bike lanes were actually proportional to the number of bikers out there, and how much taxes they really pay for the roads, there would be much, much less of that infrastructure, at least in the States.

    Cyclists are worse than Mac users when it comes to adopting elitist, oppressed-minority attitudes. I especially love how drivers are "inconsiderate" for not being super nice to cyclists, but cyclists see it as their divine freakin' right hold up traffic for three miles by going 20mph slower than everyone else, and that's not inconsiderate at all, eh?

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    1. Re:Oh apologies by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Those are the conditions.
      The "conditions" being referred to in the statute are clearly not meant to include "riding the bike in general"

      Sure. Who is making assumptions now. I don't choose to share a road with assumers like you if there is an alternative. Only when given no option do I use such a road, and if I must, I'm not going to let you force me off it.

      Cyclists are worse than Mac users when it comes to adopting elitist, oppressed-minority attitudes. I especially love how drivers are "inconsiderate" for not being super nice to cyclists, but cyclists see it as their divine freakin' right hold up traffic for three miles by going 20mph slower than everyone else, and that's not inconsiderate at all, eh?

      The oppression is quite real and sometimes lethal, thanks to attitudes like yours, that a few seconds of your time is worth more than my life. You are willing to put my life at risk because you resent slowing down for a minute.

  150. Terrible by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    Lilo always helped us out on #wikipedia, and popped in quite frequently. Terrible news :-(

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  151. Re:Who hit him? by flewp · · Score: 1

    The problem is, the bicyclist had MANY opportunities to let me by. We hit just about every stop light on the stretch of road. Lights that are normally timed so as to allow the flow of traffic to go uninterrupted. That is, they're timed so that if you hit one green light, the next few lights will most likely be green. However, because of the cyclists slower rate of speed, we ended up hitting just about every light. Surely he could have let me gone by at the light, no? There was plenty of room for him to move over to the side and let me by while waiting for the light to turn green.

    Your left turn analogy is a bit flawed. He's not doing anything wrong by turning left. IMO, A bicyclist holding up traffic, when he could have let other cars by, or taken a different route is wrong. There were plenty of side streets less than 25 yards north or south of the street we were on. Did he choose to use them? Nope. I couldn't use them because I needed to be on that street to find an open parking structure.

    And I normally never use my horn, I was simply using that as an example of "don't get pissed at me because I'm getting frustrated with the fact that you're holding up traffic. In fact, the only time I use my horn is to alert a driver ahead that the light has turned green, if they seem to be unaware of that fact, as it can be quite dangerous to have cars at a standstill at a green light.

    And don't use you're holier than thou attitude with your "non-polluting, non-parking-space-consuming" BS. It's not always possible to ride a bike. And for the record, I ride my bike just about everyday, and walk just about wherever I go. Granted, most people will drive wherever they have to go, be it 50 miles or 5 blocks. But with your holier than thou BS, you seem to assume that I'm somehow below you bike riders. Funny, considering that you're essentially telling me to better understand the facts.

    As for sharing the road, I'll gladly share it. Just make damn sure you're not taking up two lanes with your pack of riders when you could easily go single file in one lane.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  152. Re:Who hit him? by ArmorFiend · · Score: 1

    Thanks for your reply.

    > As for sharing the road, I'll gladly share it. Just make damn sure you're not taking up two lanes with your pack of riders when you could easily go single file in one lane.

    Yeah, these bicyclist convoys drive me nuts too. First of all, they're clearly not really _going anywhere_, they're just out to burn calories on their bikes for fun. So what's the diff if they packetize to allow faster vehicles to pass them? They won't draft as efficiently, but isn't pedaling the whole point? I don't get it, and in my personal, current opinion, they should have diminished rights to the road. (I think that too for admobiles and car drivers "scooping the loop", by the way ... the roads are there for TRANSPORTATION first, and recreation and other uses as capacity permits)

    As a clarification, in the left turn analogy, I was imagining that oncoming traffic was blocking the left turn for quite some time, as happens often. Both cases cause blocked traffic. I think you just have more empathy for the car, because you're in a car, and you understand that riding in a car, sometimes left turns are necessary. Well, sometimes, driving a bike, lane-blocking is necessary.

    > Surely he could have let me gone by at the light, no? There was plenty of room for him to move over to the side and let me by while waiting for the light to turn green.

    You're changing your story. Was there plenty of room, or not enough room? If there's enough room to pass in the lane, then I think he should have let you pass. But if the lane is narrow, I'm not mashing right while cars are stopped, and giving those cars the impression its okay to sleaze past me, because then the first car will sleaze past with 1 foot margin and 2mph speed difference... then the second at 1 foot margin and 8mph...then the third at 1 foot margin and 15mph, then you have a dangerous situation! For all the cyclist's consideration, the cars drivers won't let the bike back in 2/3rds of the time, believe me, I've tried. They play chicken to co-opt the right of way. And in games of chicken between bikes and cars, the cars always win.

    Even if you, personally, are reasonable and would only pass when its safe to do so, believe me, there are many out there who give in to tempatation, and pass within the margin of error if the cyclist gives them the option. Cyclists have to prepare for the lowest common denominator. The price for failure is death.

    As to there being lots of side-streets, maybe the cyclist didn't know the area well enough to realize that. If the side-streets were really so great, and your delay so interminable, maybe you could have used them to jink ahead of him? A car can cover 25m in no time, flat.

    The synchronized lights were probably aggrivating the cyclist more than you. You were losing time. The cyclist was losing time too, plus effort to restore his speed. FWIW in some places they're re-syncing them to make the effects on bike traffic (and all traffic stuck behind the bikes) less onerous.

    I admit to the "holier than thou" attitude. You also had such an attitude. I don't understand your feelings. However, I feel mine is well-justified: Car drivers pollute, take tons of space to park, and kill more Americans than 9/11 every month. What you call "BS", I call facts that sane people should weigh carefully. So even if you don't agree, you can at least understand where my opinion is coming from.

    -

    If I were going in a straight line, for, say, a mile, and there were ten cars piled up behind me with no safe place to pass, I would indeed cheerfully pull over to let them pass.

    -

    I think you're right, the "green light vegetable" situation is a good use for the horn.

  153. Re:Who hit him? by flewp · · Score: 1

    I didn't actually change my story. The plenty of room bit was in reference to the fact that at the stop light, there becomes more room (in that he could let the car through in an orderly, more organized way) in that when he came to a stop, he could have safely moved over and let us creep up to the front. Passing while actually driving was not an option because it could have put us both in jeopardy, but when we came to a stop light, I think it would have been perfectly safe for him to move over to the side, and wave us through. Surely you can agree that even with the lane still being narrow, it's safe for the bicyclist to let us through at the light? I see where you're coming from when it comes to the build up of cars behind, but there were a few opportunities for him to let us by before other cars came up behind us. Perhaps, if he had done this for us, and then another car at the next light, the bottleneck wouldn't have been so bad. Admittadely, I'm not sure exactly how the cars past the 3rd car behind us came up on us.

    I fully understood your left turn analogy. My point was that it's often necessary for cars to make left turns. It's not always necessary for bike riders to lane block. I understand that there are times when it is necessary, but I personally believe it should be as a last resort. This guy had at least two other options that I could see (letting us by at the light, or taking the other streets). I admit that he might not have had the option of side streets as you pointed out that he might not know where he's going. Or, he could possibly have known that he was looking for a particular building on the stretch of road, but was unsure where exactly it was. I'm willing to give him the benefit of the doubt on that, but I still think it's unreasonable that he failed to yield to our single car when he had the chance.

    As for using the sidestreets to get around him, this wasn't an option because as I said, the parking structures were along this particular street, and taking the side streets would not have allowed the option to find an open one, without going past them, and then turning back onto the street in question, and with the left lanes closed, it was impossible to take left turns into said parking structures.

    As for the holier than thou, again, you seem to think bikes are always a viable option for transportion. Sometimes, when say, in this scenario, carrying a portfolio of work to a place about 5 miles away, it isn't exactly an option. Like I said, I walk or bike just about everywhere I have to go, but it is not always an option.

    You say you would cheerfully let the 10 cars behind you pass - This is precisely why I said in my original post that it was just one example, and not all bicyclists should be judged on that one scenario. Surely now you can understand where my opinion is coming from.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  154. Oh bitch bitch bitch. by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

    The oppression is quite real and sometimes lethal, thanks to attitudes like yours, that a few seconds of your time is worth more than my life. You are willing to put my life at risk because you resent slowing down for a minute.

    Did I hold a gun to your head and tell you to ride your 25mph bike on a 50mph thoroughfare? No, it was your choice to do this. I have no sympathy for people who willingly put themselves into dangerous situations and then bitch about the danger -- even if it's "wrong" that your life is in danger, you have no one but yourself to blame for your being there.

    You're not being "oppressed" because 99% of the road-using populace doesn't cater to the 1% who chooses to put themselves in harm's way.

    --
    mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    1. Re:Oh bitch bitch bitch. by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      You're not being "oppressed" because 99% of the road-using populace doesn't cater to the 1% who chooses to put themselves in harm's way.

      And those niggers who put themselves in harm's way by going to the wrong part of town were asking for it too.

      Being asked to slow down is such an affront to your machismo you'd rather put someone's life at risk; and blame them for "being in harm's (i.e., your vehicle's) way". Amazing.

  155. Owned by bzuber · · Score: 0

    LOOK OUT ROB!___________________ \ |O o o o o o o o o o| o | R O F L B U S ! | /L, |____________________| (o)/(o) (o) (o) LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL DUMBFUCK SHOULDN'T PLAY WITH HIS TOYS IN TRAFFIC!

  156. Helmets are ineffective in automotive collisions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...above 20 MPH. Go and do the research. Get any helmet manufacturer to say otherwise in writing. Heck, cycle helmet safety standards are lacking. CPSC is the current standard, why did they abandon Snell B95 which was much better?