Slashdot Mirror


5 Strangest Materials

MattSparkes writes to tell us that NewScientist recently posted a quick look at five interesting materials with some very strange properties. There are liquids you can walk on, liquids that will escape containers by creeping up the sides, and magnetic liquids that can easily show you the shape of magnetic fields. The story also offers video links to display some of more amazing properties described.

196 comments

  1. I have one for you by heauxmeaux · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would like to nominate whatever the hell Wonder Bread is made from.

    One tiny loaf can turn an entire nation into disgusting bloated sacks of lazy crap.
    Truly a mystery of the ages.

    --
    Beat 'Em and Eat 'Em
    1. Re:I have one for you by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

      What about transparent aluminum?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:I have one for you by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would like to nominate whatever the hell Wonder Bread is made from.

      I believe that would be high fructose corn syrup. Yes. Mostly high fructose corn syrup.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:I have one for you by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have a feeling I'm missing a reference to something, but in case I'm not, Wonder Bread isn't that bad. It's 60 calories a slice. 70 is about average for white bread. Most whole wheat breads are around 90. The best you can buy around here is 35, and it tastes like recycled toilet paper that came out too moist and delicious so they ran a hairdryer over it for a week. If you're trying to be less of one of those bloated lazy crap sacks, switching to Wonder Bread isn't a bad place to start.

    4. Re:I have one for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      60 empty calories made from refined sugars and saw dust. The quality of the food is more important than the number of calories it has.

    5. Re:I have one for you by king-manic · · Score: 1

      I prefer real bread to any "white" bread. Rye, sour dough, French bread. ect.. "white" bread feels like I'm eating peanut butter without the peanuts after a few chews.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    6. Re:I have one for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm scared of foods that mold won't grow on. It's just not right.

    7. Re:I have one for you by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Absolutely. Unless you're trying to stop the "bloated, lazy crap"-ness mentioned. Unless that was literal bloating and non-fatness-related laziness. Since it was country-wide in scope and water-retention is hardly a national epidemic, I assume the OP meant, "it makes you fat." In which case, 99% of the time, the only number you need to worry about is calories.

    8. Re:I have one for you by waynemcdougall · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to work out the dynamics of the matrix.

      --
      Recycle PCs and build a wireless community network www.hillsborough.org.nz
    9. Re:I have one for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gold can be beaten into a transparent gold foil (0.00013 mm thick)

    10. Re:I have one for you by AlHunt · · Score: 1

      >If you're trying to be less of one of those bloated lazy crap sacks, switching to Wonder Bread isn't a bad place to start

      And you are the local Wonder Bread rep?

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    11. Re:I have one for you by acherusia · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have mod points, but I'm commenting instead because you kind of hit a pet peeve of mine. I used to feel the same way about low calorie foods. The lower the calories were per serving, the better it was for me, even if it tasted like someone had put dog turds in it.

      Only I was never satisfied after that, because everything was so bloody tasteless. I want food with flavor and texture and interest, damnit. So I ate more because I was craving something that resembled real food. I gained a lot of weight following that advice. Then I switched to cooking more from scratch (which I enjoy anyway), to paying more attention to the flavor of the food than the caloric content, and to enjoying what I ate. And to not eat crap food when I wasn't hungry simply because it was time to eat. Didn't lose the weight I gained (partially, I'll admit, because a hobby of baking desserts, especially when bored or stressed, just never helps on any diet), but didn't gain any more. And I was a hell of a lot happier with myself than when I was eating cardboard for breakfast, lunch, and dinner.

      I'm not saying you should always only eat high calorie foods, just don't eat low-calorie food if you think it tastes like crap. Life's too long to waste on bad food every day.

    12. Re:I have one for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yup, cooking from scratch is definitely the way to go. If you're looking to diet, I recommend spicy foods. Capsacin irritates the stomach lining and makes you feel more full. And spicy food is tasty too.

      Me, I just make 10 bean and cheese burritos every week. Made with organic beans. onions, olive oil, cheese, green chile, habanero, sour cream, and tortillas. Cook once and freeze.

      Then I cook other home made foods if I feel like it, or just eat a burrito if I'm feeling lazy.

    13. Re:I have one for you by imdx80 · · Score: 3, Funny

      i can also think of a object that gets bigger (like an auxetic material), when beaten or (repeatedly) stretched

    14. Re:I have one for you by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Cheddite Cheese (Source: Star Smashers of the Galaxy Raiders) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star_Smashers_of_the_ Galaxy_Rangers

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    15. Re:I have one for you by Raenex · · Score: 1

      It's not just calories. You'll get fatter eating a bunch of sugary, empty calories instead of wholesome food that satisfies your nutritional needs and fills you up without putting you on a sugar rollercoaster. The twin epidemics of diabetes and obesity is no coincidence.

    16. Re:I have one for you by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      This works really well with some foods. Buy yourself some really good chocolate, then you're good after a couple squares, you don't have to eat very much. If you buy crappy chocolate, you end up eating an entire bar, and still not feeling satisfied.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    17. Re:I have one for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about edible underwear? That stuff blows my mind.

    18. Re:I have one for you by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wonder Bread, which is neither...

      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    19. Re:I have one for you by nomadic · · Score: 1

      A good combo is low-calorie foods and low-calorie, but very flavorful, flavoring stuff. Mustard, hot sauce, salsa, vinegar, spices, etc. A mixture of mustard and curry powder is a good combo.

    20. Re:I have one for you by markmier · · Score: 1

      That's aluminium, you insensitive clod!

    21. Re:I have one for you by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      You must mean Twinkies, right?

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    22. Re:I have one for you by waif69 · · Score: 1

      That would be High Fructose Corn Syrup.

    23. Re:I have one for you by chochos · · Score: 1

      And it emits a super fluid that when placed in the right spot, produces people.

    24. Re:I have one for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pet peeve of mine, so sorry if I offend anyone... but - ORGANIC beans? As opposed to the inorganic kind that is so common I suppose?

  2. Finally an answer! by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always wondered why I kept sliding out of the bath.
    Now I know its just because my atoms all have the same quantum state.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Finally an answer! by Guy+Harris · · Score: 1
      Now I know its just because my atoms all have the same quantum state.

      You must be a real Boso, then.

    2. Re:Finally an answer! by spyinnzus · · Score: 1

      you never have anything witty to say Fermi...

    3. Re:Finally an answer! by Peldor · · Score: 1

      Virgin is not a quantum state.

  3. Magnetic Fluid by sporkme · · Score: 5, Informative
    4. Ferrofluids - magnetic fluids that can look spectacular. They're made from nanoscale magnetic particles suspended in a liquid. The spectacular sculpture in the video below is made using a ferrofluid and electromagnets.
    You can get this stuff from United Nuclear (about 2/3 of the way down the page, sorry no anchors), as well as some fun looking "super magnets" and some radioactive ores.

    When I read about the fluid that can flow up the sides of a container, all I could think about was THE BLOB!
    1. Re:Magnetic Fluid by barry99705 · · Score: 5, Funny

      DO NOT!!! Put one of those magnets within two feet of the bottle of ferro fluid while the lid is off. That stuff stains paint, on the ceiling....

    2. Re:Magnetic Fluid by jobsagoodun · · Score: 1

      Wow, great link. Some of those really big magnets, the ones that say "THESE ARE DEFINATELY ___NOT___ TOYS DO NOT PUT THEM IN THE SAME ROOM AS ANY OTHER MAGNETS" look like absolutley fabulous toys!!

    3. Re:Magnetic Fluid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is also fluid that changes from liquid to solid in magnetic field and vice versa (according to certain university course). It can be liquid in a cup and can be pulled out with magnet as a solid piece. Do anyone know name of that stuff?

    4. Re:Magnetic Fluid by bar-agent · · Score: 1
      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    5. Re:Magnetic Fluid by bdonalds · · Score: 1

      I just got my order of "super magnets" from United Nuclear in the mail yesterday. I bought a bunch of 1/4" spherical and 2 3/4" spherical magnets. They are ridiculously strong, and more dorky fun than should be allowed!!

      Be careful though...they are seriously strong. The 3/4" magnets are strong enough that I can place one on the palm of my hand and the other on the back of my hand and they hold tight! I can't imagine what some of the larger magnets are like to handle....

      --
      The most important thing to do in your life is to not interfere with somebody else's life. -FZ
  4. Dry Ice doesn' freeze at -78C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can make a cold solution of dry ice and acetone at -78. You can also make one at -100 using dry ice and ether.

    1. Re:Dry Ice doesn' freeze at -78C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And you can make a solution of water and sodium chloride at -9c, does that mean water doesn't freeze at 0c?

    2. Re:Dry Ice doesn' freeze at -78C by presentt · · Score: 1

      Water, as any liquid, only freezes at 0c at 1 atmosphere of pressure and no dissolved contaminants. For every ion in a dissolved compound (for example, sodium chloride consists of Na+ and Cl- when dissolved. This makes it have what is called a "van't Hoff factor" of 2.), the freezing point of the solvent drops. The actual depression is a function of the solvent's heat of fusion and freezing point under 1atm of pressure, as well as the concentration of the solute and its van't Hoff factor. This is why we salt roads in the winter.

      Also, substances may freeze at substantially lower temperatures than normal if there is nearly perfect purity, due to a phenomenon known as nucleation. The substance's molecules need some form of particle to act as a "seed" to start forming crystals on.

      --
      I decided to stop stealing cynical quotes to use as a signature line.
    3. Re:Dry Ice doesn' freeze at -78C by GTMoogle · · Score: 1

      Off topic, but anyway...

      I was making Jello and took a 2 cup pyrex measuring cup from the recently-finished dishwasher. Filled it with tap water and put it in the microwave. I forgot how long I put it in and I didn't see any condensation on the rim so I figured it wasn't long enough and put it in for another minute. When I took it out the handle was much warmer than I thought it should be, so I carefully tapped a pinch of Jello powder into the measuring cup from about 2 feet in the air. Yup, I had superheated water. It erupted into a frothing boiling mass that emptied half of the water from the cup. It was really neat to witness firsthand, but I'm very glad I knew about it beforehand, or else I would probably have dumped the whole packet in while holding the damned thing.

      Remember kids, knowing is half the battle.

  5. Superfluid temperatures by Tx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to TFA, "To make a superfluid you must cool helium down to a couple of a degrees below zero - not one to try at home."

    Now I'm no physicist, but I'm pretty sure a couple of degrees below absolute zero isn't possible, and on any other scale I can think of, it's a bit warm for superfluids. I guess he meant "above zero", although a unit would still have been useful. Funnily enough, I was just bitching about scientific faux pas in the mainstream media, but New Scientist?

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
    1. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...or maybe, just maybe, it's hyperbole?

    2. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      "Absolute" isnt a very good assumption when lacking a scale. As for what scale:

      "First one, then the other."

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    3. Re:Superfluid temperatures by TheManifold · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you know that the Editor of New Scientist is a biologist?

      Food for thought.

    4. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Mursk · · Score: 2

      A quick Google search reveals that Helium acts as a superfluid at a temperature of ~5 K, so the most likely explanation is that the author did, in fact, mean a few degrees above (absolute) zero.

      --
      "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
    5. Re:Superfluid temperatures by merreborn · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that this is a blog entry, not an edited article. Hence the blatant error.

    6. Re:Superfluid temperatures by shimage · · Score: 3, Informative

      My recollection was that it (the HeI/HeII phase transition) was in the neighborhood of 2.2 K. Now, you can say, "that's pretty close to 5 K", but keep in mind that at 1 atm, the boiling point is just over 4 K, so 0–5 K covers all of hydrogen's interesting low-T behavior.

    7. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Khashishi · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is possible to have negative temperatures under certain circumstances, using the thermodynamic definition of temperature, but these negative temperatures are actually hotter than any positive temperature. (Positive) absolute zero is still the coldest something can be, while negative absolute zero is the hottest anything can possibly be. Negative temperatures are only possible in a system where the number of quantum states available decreases as energy is added to the system.

    8. Re:Superfluid temperatures by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I just read "Hell phase transition" and wondered if someone had finally advanced current thinking on the physics of the supernatural...

    9. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Funnily enough, I was just bitching about scientific faux pas in the mainstream media, but New Scientist?
      Dude, have you seen New Scientist lately? Their cover story a few months ago was a levitation device for flying cars. Which would have been great, if the basic operating principle weren't one that could have been debunked by a sharp high school student. Lo, behold the mighty EmDrive.

      New Scientist's response is just embarrasing. From editor Jeremy Webb (emphasis added):

      "It is a fair criticism that New Scientist did not make clear enough how controversial Roger Shawyer's engine is. We should have made more explicit where it apparently contravenes the laws of nature and reported that several physicists declined to comment on the device because they thought it too contentious.

      But should New Scientist should have covered this story at all? The answer is a resounding yes..."

      New Scientist is fun to read, but it's definitely not a good idea to mistake it as a source of solid science reporting.
      --
      ~Idarubicin
    10. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Mursk · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're correct. 5 K is when the Helium becomes (ordinary) liquid. It becomes a superfluid at ~2 K. Guess my Google search was a bit too quick. ;)

      --
      "This thing does science so hard, you say, 'I've never seen that much science.'" -Sam
    11. Re:Superfluid temperatures by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      "Which would have been great, if the basic operating principle weren't one that could have been debunked by a sharp high school student."

      It's ok, that was the "new" part...

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
    12. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know that the Editor of New Scientist is a biologist?

      Food for thought.

      What, him, or what he works with?

    13. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hello!: Because it is vocally oriented, sarcasm can be difficult to grasp in written form and is easily misinterpreted.

    14. Re:Superfluid temperatures by Psychotic_Wrath · · Score: 0

      Because the person stated "Degrees" in TFA it shoud be assumed it isn't Kelvin because when measuring in Kelvin the label of degrees is not applied to it. However, there is no way a few degrees below zero in celcius or ferenheite would yeild frozen helium there must have been a mistake.

      --

      Doctors do Massage in Longview WA now, who knew?
    15. Re:Superfluid temperatures by kalirion · · Score: 1

      We should have made more explicit where it apparently contravenes the laws of nature

      Reminded me of this little classic.

    16. Re:Superfluid temperatures by permawired · · Score: 0

      To make a superfluid you must cool helium down to a couple of a degrees above absolute zero - not one to try at home that is what is in the article.... I just cut ant paste it myself... Me thinks you need a better material for your glasses my friend :)

  6. Does it include the ever mysterious ethyl alcohol by HMC+CS+Major · · Score: 5, Funny

    The simple liquid capable of making clothes come off, cars swerve, and random impregnation?

  7. What? by Swimport · · Score: 1

    What no flubber?

  8. Safe to drink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder which are safe to drink?

  9. Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Fall heavy towards the moon, and the moon falls also towards you." -- Nietzsche

    Hammer and feather are dropped simultaneously from equal heights (as measured by distance from the center of the moon), separated laterally by a distance substantially less than the moon's diameter. Both hammer and feather experience force from the moon's gravity proportional to their mass, and hence both accelerate at the same rate. Meanwhile, the moon is also accelerating towards the other two objects, but unevenly so: the hammer exerts a greater gravitational pull due to its greater mass. The moon is therefore subject to a torque, causing it to accelerate more rapidly towards the hammer.

    The hammer is first to hit the ground.

    Anyone who denies this truth is a spatially absolutist lunocentric whose refusal to recognize the validity of hammer/feather mechanics places him wholly beyond the help of Galilean metaphysics. Such hammer/feather rejectionists ought to be banished to the stars, for their own good and for the good of not only hammers and feathers but all subjugated smaller objects, everywhere, who find themselves victims of this scientifically perpetrated emassculation.

    --
    a756f345ec354225c08ff1a10a43162a

  10. What? no mention of silly putty!? by Mc_Anthony · · Score: 1

    You insensitive clods.

    1. Re:What? no mention of silly putty!? by palndrumm · · Score: 2, Informative

      From TFA:
      1. Dilatants - fluids that get more solid when stressed.

      That pretty much covers silly putty, doesn't it?

    2. Re:What? no mention of silly putty!? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Informative
      Actually, no; Silly Putty expands when stressed, it doesn't get more solid.

      I've always known dilatants as Newtonian Solids (for instance, cornstarch mixed with water, which you can sink your hand into, but which can also withstand the force of a sledgehammer [as can your hand if it's submersed at the time]).

    3. Re:What? no mention of silly putty!? by Foehg · · Score: 2, Informative

      I believe you mean 'non-Newtonian'.

      Oh, and "Slow down, cowboy!"

  11. So Did Jesus walk on water using cornstarch? by Phrogman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    It was the first thing that came to mind when I saw the demo of the people running over the water like that...

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    1. Re:So Did Jesus walk on water using cornstarch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      at the time corn only existed in the Americas.

      so, no.

    2. Re:So Did Jesus walk on water using cornstarch? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, he walked on ice. Do a Google search about it.

    3. Re:So Did Jesus walk on water using cornstarch? by really? · · Score: 1

      Of course. Well, except for the fact that corn was no known in the old world at the time of JC's walkabouts.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    4. Re:So Did Jesus walk on water using cornstarch? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, except for the fact that corn was no known in the old world at the time of JC's walkabouts.

      That's why it's a miracle.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    5. Re:So Did Jesus walk on water using cornstarch? by HermanAB · · Score: 1

      He knew where the rocks were.

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
    6. Re:So Did Jesus walk on water using cornstarch? by Arthur+Dent+'99 · · Score: 1

      I've heard the ice explanation before, but it's simply not plausible given the information in the text of Matthew 14:22-33.

      1. If the lake was solidified enough for someone to walk across it, a wind-powered wooden boat wouldn't be able to sail across it.
      2. It's very difficult for ice to make waves.
      3. Most people forget that not only did Jesus walk on the water, but so did Peter. Peter jumped out of the boat and walked toward Jesus while Jesus was still approaching. At first, Peter did fine, but once he started to notice the waves, he began to sink, something that is also difficult to do on ice. Once Jesus caught him, though, they walked into the boat. If, as some may contend, there was ice under the surface of the water, why would it sink under the weight of one person, then suddenly bouy back up with the weight of an additional person?
      4. Finally, there's nothing miraculous about walking on ice. I'm sure there are hundreds of Canadians walking on frozen lakes right now. No one in their right mind would go up to one of them and claim that they are the Son of God.
    7. Re:So Did Jesus walk on water using cornstarch? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Here's an article about it.

      1. The whole lake wasn't frozen; it was a patch of floating ice, called "spring ice". The wooden boat was sailing through the mostly unfrozen water.

      2. See #1.

      3. Maybe Peter stepped onto the edge of the ice or into the water. Or, maybe that part was made up. After all, Matthew wasn't even alive when Jesus was; all he did was compile oral stories that other people told. Oral history has a well-known way of turning actual but uninteresting events into fantastic myths.

      4. There's nothing miraculous about walking on floating ice, but if observers can't see the ice and think you're walking on water, and you tell them you're walking on water, it will seem like a miracle. For comparison, look up Joseph Smith, the founder of Mormonism. He claimed to find some gold tablets that only he could read and translate, and which were later lost. Is this true, or did he make it all up? A bunch of people in Utah believe this, but most people think it's hooey.

  12. Does it include the ever mysterious insertion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silly poster. When was the last time you've seen a pregnant bottle of beer?

    1. Re:Does it include the ever mysterious insertion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen what can be done with beer bottles on the usenet. Never underestimate drunk chicks.

  13. "There are liquids you can walk on..." by EXMSFT · · Score: 5, Funny

    Really? Jesus!

    <sorry - had to do it.>

    1. Re:"There are liquids you can walk on..." by dbIII · · Score: 1
      Really? Jesus!

      Not with those holes in your feet. Pilate.

  14. Re:Does it include the ever mysterious ethyl alcoh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Funny you should say that as I read this today:

    "...Yesterday, government scientists suggested that men should take a look at their beer consumption, considering the results of a recent analysis that revealed the presence of female hormones in beer. The theory is that drinking beer makes men turn into women. To test the finding, 100 men were fed 6 pints of beer each. It was then observed that 100% of the men gained weight, talked excessively without making sense, became overly emotional, couldn't drive, failed to think rationally, argued over nothing, and refused to apologize when wrong. No further testing is planned..."

  15. What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the liquids used to put out the flames coming from a slashdotted server?

  16. Slashdotted by RAMMS+EIN · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunately, it does not include the mysterious liquid that prevents servers from being slashdotted.

    Coral cache link

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
    1. Re:Slashdotted by slothman32 · · Score: 1

      I looked for the "slashdotted" tag and found none so I checked.
      Regardless, or irregardlesslyfulness if you want, it worked for me.
      How good is "newscientist" against /.ing?

      --
      Why don't you guys have friends or journals?
  17. I got it. So I've got to ask: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't I see you at the rollout of the first wheel?

  18. Dry Ice by Kelson · · Score: 1
    Last of all, perhaps the best thing is that it's not that hard to get hold of - search online and you'll see.

    Forget going online. Chances are you can pick it up at your local grocery store. It's been a mainstay at Halloween parties for years: Punch bowl + block of dry ice = foggy punch.

    1. Re:Dry Ice by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It's also used to ship perishables. I ordered some sticky buns from pepperidge farms - bake and eat type - and they came in a styrofoam cooler (recycled) with a big chunk of dry ice (played with in the driveway - muddy puddles look pretty amazingly gross with dry ice in them.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Dry Ice by Nephilium · · Score: 1

      Completely off-topic... but also in mixed drinks... there's an old drink called swamp gas. It's a mixture of Everclear, Mountain Dew, the inside of a glow stick (non-toxic), and a granule of dry ice...

      Of course, glowing, fizzing, foaming, foggy drinks aren't my first choice...

      Nephilium

      "A rising economic tide is bad for people who live off of the poverty of others." -- Jonah Goldberg

  19. Yes but can they change shape into Robert Patrick by spaceramblings · · Score: 3, Funny

    and go looking for 'that boy'?

  20. My keyboard by MrWa · · Score: 1

    I notice they didn't mention the goop left on my keyboard after I'm gone from home for long weekend. My roommate doesn't seem to know what it is either...

  21. Market potential for auxetic materials by Pvt_Waldo · · Score: 1

    Pull it, make it longer, it gets bigger... Hmm. I think there would be a big market in the sex toy industry for "devices" made from Auxetic materials (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auxetic).

  22. They forgot Aerogel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Aerogel is a low-density solid-state material derived from gel in which the liquid component of the gel has been replaced with gas. The result is an extremely low density solid with several remarkable properties, most notably its effectiveness as an insulator. It is nicknamed frozen smoke, solid smoke or blue smoke due to its semi-transparent nature and the way light scatters in the material; however, it feels like extruded polystyrene to the touch.

    1. Re:They forgot Aerogel by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      There was even a version saturated with helium that could float in gas. Granted, it was on CO2 or Ar.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  23. Superfluid Helium video by tha_rippa1be · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At the end of this video there is a short part about the fluid going upwards. http://web.ujf-grenoble.fr/PHY/FOREXPER/TPhelium/p ages/Presentation%20film.html

  24. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Mattcelt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm embarrassed to admit this, but I can't tell if your post is hyperbole or not.

    So straight up - does the hammer really hit the ground first? Replacing the hammer and feather with larger bodies - say, one (as the hammer's stand-in) which is the same mass as the moon, and the other (the feather's double) which is 1/10th the mass of the moon, it seems obvious that the more massive body will impact first, as it does have a significantly larger bearing on the moon.

    ...HOWEVER...

    Does the hammer's insignificant size relative to the moon negate any realistic gravitational influence it may have? Or for that matter, does the term 'significantly larger' really apply to the hammer and feather?

    I think the 3-body dynamics may be so small at that scale as to be nearly nullified - I would suspect that the gravitational pull of the hammer on the moon would move it less than the diameter of an atom required to change the timing of the impact of the two objects. [Unless one is counting the impact of the electron shells prior to the impact of the nucleus, in which case I suspect the preponderance of heavier (atomic weight-wise) elements in the hammer, with correspondingly more electrons, necessitating population of the "larger" d- or f-shells, would be first. But again, it's not the gravitational influence of the mass of the hammer that would be the deciding factor...]

    So.... anybody care to do the math?

  25. Number 6 - Elastic fluids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They left out elastic fluids, such as a mixture of high molecular weight polyethylene oxide in water. Once the fluid begins to pour out of its container, it will partially empty the container, even if righted. This is the open siphon effect. If while pouring out the fluid, you cut it with scissors, the fluid will snap back into the beaker like a rubber band. This can all be done at room temperature.

    What makes this happen is the high molecular weight polyer. The molecules become entangled, and when poured, they pull each other along, resulting in the emptying of the container.

    These fluids also exhibit other interesting behaviours, such as the Weissenberg effect, where when rotating rod is placed in the fluid, the fluid climbs up the rod. Also, add some particles (or bubbles), start stirring, then suddently remove the stirring rod, you will see the fluid snap back when it comes to rest.

    1. Re:Number 6 - Elastic fluids by bdonalds · · Score: 1

      I blew some of this stuff out of my nose this morning!

      --
      The most important thing to do in your life is to not interfere with somebody else's life. -FZ
  26. 5 strange materials by robyannetta · · Score: 2, Funny

    Alas, Taco Bell was left off the list again, coming in at number six.

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
    1. Re:5 strange materials by Kelson · · Score: 1
      Alas, Taco Bell was left off the list again, coming in at number six.

      And yet there are seven layers in their burritos. We've accounted for six, but what's the seventh? Please, someone fund this vital research!

  27. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    I'm embarrassed to admit this, but I can't tell if your post is hyperbole or not.

    The hammer would hit first assuming that the relevent section of the moon was perfectly spherical, but the effect is so miniscule that I doubt you could detect it with existing measuring devices. The effect would be largest when the hammer and feather are dropped from opposite sides of the moon (the hammer would pull the moon away from the feather, if they were close by they would both pull the moon towards the other but unevenly so). Certainly there's no way Gallileo would have been able to see a difference. Had he, you know, been on the moon dropping feathers and hammers.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  28. One More I would inlcude: Plutonium by Gat0r30y · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Funny note: as i was looking for the thermodynamic properties of plutonium, ebay promised to make me a great offer on it. Seriously, like ice it will expand and get less dense as it drops in temperature. Only, instead of just the one phase change, there are many. Unfortunately, this is the best I can find for a phase diagram. In thermo, my prof put up a much nicer one, just trust, the phase diagram is pretty crazy looking.

    --
    Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    1. Re:One More I would inlcude: Plutonium by Gat0r30y · · Score: 1
      --
      Prediction: The real iPhone killer is going to be sex robots from Japan. Think about it.
    2. Re:One More I would inlcude: Plutonium by whitehatlurker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wikipedia has a nicer version of the same diagram. It appears that only the delta phase (or delta prime phase) exhibits this expansion on cooling phenomena.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
  29. Water comes to mind by G00F · · Score: 0, Troll
    Now I haven't RTFA yet, but going off just the blurb:

    There are liquids you can walk on, liquids that will escape containers by creeping up the sides, and magnetic liquids that can easily show you the shape of magnetic fields.

    Funny, how water can be made to do those.
    • Liquids you can walk on: Plenty of small creatures walk on water as a liquid, and so could a human with the right pair of shoes, or moving fast enough.
    • liquids that will escape containers by creeping up the sides: Put a straw in a glass of water, and the water will be higher in the straw. Do it with a smaller/thinner tube.
    • magnetic liquids that can easily show you the shape of magnetic fields: again you can do this with putting things in the water.

    --
    The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    1. Re:Water comes to mind by StarvingSE · · Score: 1

      Your first two points have to do with surface tension. TFA is talking about non-newtonian fluids which act like solids when a force is applied. See the video of the guy walking across the lake o' corn starch.

      --
      I got nothin'
    2. Re:Water comes to mind by Dadoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah, but water is one of the few (only?) materials whose liquid is denser than its solid and, as a result, freezes from the top down, rather than the bottom up. That's pretty strange, in my book.

      It also has one of the highest specific heats of any material. (Highest of any common material.)

      --
      Sit, Ubuntu, sit. Good dog.
    3. Re:Water comes to mind by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Sure water is pretty unique amongst chemicals, but the article is about "stuff that behaves a little bit outside the norm". Water, being among the most common materials on Earth, does not fit that description. It may be interesting, but it's in no way unfamiliar to anyone.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    4. Re:Water comes to mind by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, and it self-dissociates in its liquid state - hence pH, easy ionization required for cell behavior, etc. As I stated in an earlier post, it's weird stuff, common and "familiar" or not.

      --
      Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  30. I love stuff like this! by markbt73 · · Score: 2, Funny

    When I was a kid I had a book called "Scientific Experiments You Can Eat." I seem to remember there being something like the "Oobleck" in there.

    I'd love to try it out, but I get the feeling my wife would kill me if I started cooking up stuff like that in the kitchen...

    --
    "Oh boy! Are we going to try something dangerous?"
  31. Negative IOR? by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

    How about a material that has a negative index of refraction?

    It only works for energy with a wavelength of a few meters right now, but weird shit none the less.

    http://www.las.iastate.edu/newnews/soukoulis0324.s html

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    1. Re:Negative IOR? by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      funny- I had a physics class with that guy. Interesting to see him pop up here!

    2. Re:Negative IOR? by CorSci81 · · Score: 1

      I'm amused by your choice of link. That's the man who taught me introductory physics as an undergraduate. Brilliant researcher, horrible lecturer.

    3. Re:Negative IOR? by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

      Agreed on both counts. I hope I don't have to deal with him again in a classroom.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    4. Re:Negative IOR? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Not true. IIRC someone's gotten a material to exhibit negative refractive index at infrared wavelengths.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  32. Try this at home - if... by jpellino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ... you have to mix the non-newtonian fluid pretty accurately - too thin and it won't support you, too thick and it's trivial... you'll notice they have a stirrer of some sort in the pool video - this is important - this stuff can settle in short time so you end up with mostly water above and mostly cornstarch below. Jearl Walker once lept over tables into a feed trough full of this stufff on his show. He didn't splash a drop. He did, however lose his balance, and tipped the whole thing which slowly flowed into the audience...

    And they mention conrflour - I'd stick with cornstarch. One time going France and Hungary to teach science, I figured I'd forego the big containers of white powder on the international flights... and getting to Nice, I found that you can only buy boxes of cornflour, not boxes of cornstarch in French grocery stores. You could get sugar-packet sized envelopes of it, which were labeled in French with something I could not read but I imagine said "You are in France. We are famous of our sauces. If you need cornstarch to make a sauce, then go away!."

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:Try this at home - if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I'm not mistaken, cornflour == cornstarch.

    2. Re:Try this at home - if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they mention conrflour - I'd stick with cornstarch..
      What Americans call cornstarch the British call cornflour. I don't know what the French would call it, but if you were reading an English translation on a French box, it probably was British English.

  33. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Mattcelt · · Score: 2, Informative

    That's ok, David Scott did it for him:
    http://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a15/a15.clsout3.html

    So what you're saying is while there's a theoretical difference between the impact timings, the practical effect likely couldn't be measured. Makes sense.

  34. What about aerogel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about aerogel?

    1. Re:What about aerogel? by runlevel+5 · · Score: 0

      Aerogel is solid. All the materials in the article are fluids.

  35. Re:Moderators!!! by parasonic · · Score: 1
    He is unfairly singling out AC's.
    So Anonymous Cowards are made of Wonderbread? Or are you saying that only AC's eat Wonderbread?
  36. Re:Not relevant to my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have to ask you're never gonna find out.

  37. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by JeffAMcGee · · Score: 1

    I've seen this comment somewhere before. Although this comment is interesting, it is off-topic and redundant.

    --
    This sig cannot be proven true.
  38. Re:Moderators!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Both.

  39. Re:Moderators!!! by jpardey · · Score: 1

    It would seem to me like he was making a sharp jab of SATIRE and WIT at people who post AC.

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
  40. You want Smart Mass by ylikone · · Score: 1

    Thinkgeek sells putty called Smart Mass which solidifies when you apply force.

    --
    Meh.
  41. Re:Moderators!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, no

  42. why are the only interesting materials only fluids by The_Rook · · Score: 1

    united nuclear also makes aerogel. that's an interesting material and it's a solid

    http://www.unitednuclear.com/aerogel.htm

    --
    when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  43. Aerogel by Coppit · · Score: 1, Redundant
    I always thought aerogel was some pretty cool stuff. If you insulated your house with it, you would only need one candle to keep the entire house warm. :)

    1. Re:Aerogel by kaszeta · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I always thought aerogel was some pretty cool stuff. If you insulated your house with it, you would only need one candle to keep the entire house warm. :)

      It's not quite that magical. A two inch layer of aerogel will keep things about as insulated as a really good vacuum thermos, however.

      I know, I work with the stuff on a regular basis, we use it as insulation, by the 400 liter barrel. See some of my pics of some of the solid slabs I have in the office.

  44. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could have sworn I have read this same exact post in the past.

  45. Ummm... by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny
    LSD is a pretty strange material.

    Hey! Who moved the submit button? And what are all these ponies doing here?

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! Ponies!!!!!

    2. Re:Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want a real psychedilic experience, try ayahuasca. www.ayahuasca.com

      Just an example of a journey:

      "As usual, I was very quiet on the upward slope. I was getting lots of pretty closed eyed visuals and intricate colored patters all over everything. There is this weird buzzing noise all over everything. I know the brew is strong because at the 45 minute mark, my wife starts turning into an elf and I start giggling all the time. I start to get these really cool flashes of experience and I decide to lie down on the blanket by the fire to let them happen. I lie on my back and stare up at the trees that tower overhead. The stars are literally dancing in the heavens. Embers from the fire and smoke are rising up overhead, turning into fairies that dance up into the trees. The trees sprout flowers of all sorts and varieties and begin to move about in their own rhythms. The tree branches appear to be filled with little critters with big eyes, all peering at me. Patterns of colored crisscrossing lines dance down out of the sky and swirl around the rising smoke and embers.

      I start rubbing and scratching my head. I don't really remember deciding to do it, it sort of happened by itself. I was rewarded with incredible pleasure and vibrant visions. As soon as I started to do that, I got my first entity contact. It looked like a sentient salamander about 2 feet long including a tail. It wrapped itself around my head. I could see that all the happy pleasure feelings in the nerves in my scalp were producing this energy that was dripping out of my head. This creature was flipping out, running around on my head, eating the energy, saying, "OH YEAH, OH YEAH, Oh this is good, Oh yeah, yesyesyes, OH THIS IS GOOD, UH UH OH YEAH! YUM YUM YUM." I was startled and I stopped rubbing my head. It looked startled and ran away.

      I realized that it was time to go find the outhouse for my purge. It was almost pitch black by this time. I don't really know how I made it to the outhouse. My world was completely made up of swirling colors by now. The purge was difficult but swift. Afterwards, there were too many colors and it was too dark to find my way back. Luckily, my wife realized that I had gone to the outhouse without the flashlight and came to get me and lead me back.

      I washed my mouth out and then went back to my blanket, too far into the dream to talk to anyone. I closed my eyes and fell into hyperspace. Some other aliens played games with me. One of them said, in a nice feminine voice, "If that something wasn't that, It would be something else!!" and then went off laughing. J and his wife A were deep in some personal conversation about personal issues between them that J's experience was bringing to the surface so my wife came over to cuddle with me on the blanket. She felt warm and loving next to me. I closed my eyes and felt safe and warm and wonderful all over. I tried to wrap my love around her and into her and the most wondrous thing happened. It was like the boundaries that separate us came down and we merged together into one. I felt our souls wrap around each other, coiling tightly and I felt totally ecstatic and in love and filled with pure ecstatic joy and made a wish that she and I would be together through eternity.

      Then I was in hyperspace again. I have been here before, on my two other breakthrough journeys, so I know a little bit about how to get around. It was ten times easier to move around than normal because we were two beings in one which gave us way more control. Hyperspace was, as always, a huge series of interconnected complex multicolored rooms that changed constantly filled with entities of all sorts. The entities seemed to be taking particular interest in our connected soul situation. They seemed to think it was quite interesting. Then, quite suddenly, they all split. They expressed something along the lines of "HE is coming!!!!!" and they all left. Then hyperspace itself came alive. The rooms became infinitely more complex and I realized that it was some sort of ultra powerfu

    3. Re:Ummm... by csrster · · Score: 1

      One of these days, when the kids have moved away and I'm quietly retired, I'm really going to have to try all those psychadelics I missed out on when I was young. (ie all of them) (one at a time)

    4. Re:Ummm... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Ayahuasca's great. Tried some of that with Terrence McKenna. DMT is also very interesting.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  46. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Brandybuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm embarrassed to admit this, but I can't tell if your post is hyperbole or not.

    This is Slashdot. He was probably being completely serious.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  47. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

    funny you mention that, i googled the GP's sig, out of curiosity, and the only two hits were the threads in your links...

  48. A liquid you can walk on.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called Glass.

    1. Re:A liquid you can walk on.. by Apocalypse111 · · Score: 1

      The idea that glass is in fact a liquid is in dispute, and is likely not correct. Check here for more details.

      --
      There is no mod option "-1: Disagree" for a reason. "Overrated" is not an acceptable substitute. Post something instead.
  49. Re:why are the only interesting materials only flu by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

    Dry ice is not a fluid.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  50. Liquid Metacrystal Displays by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    What about LCDs of metamaterial crystals? Any way to use their refraction for multidimensional, or just higher efficiency, light modulation? What about a liquid metamaterial suspending optically normal crystals?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Liquid Metacrystal Displays by dweebzilla · · Score: 1

      What about - Donald Trump's Hair

      --
      Get your tagline off my lawn.
  51. Re:Does it include the ever mysterious ethyl alcoh by Landshark17 · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're doing plenty of casual studies on it at my college.

    --
    This sig is false.
  52. More than five things... by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

    Even common, everyday stuff can have interesting properties. You can suspend liquid oxygen in a strong magnetic field, for instance, because it's a paramagnetic element. Of course, one could argue that _liquid_ oxygen isn't really an everyday material.

    1. Re:More than five things... by trentblase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can also suspend a frog in a strong magnetic field because water is diamagnetic. http://www.hfml.ru.nl/froglev.html

    2. Re:More than five things... by Wilson_6500 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but liquid oxygen you can suspend with a permanent magnet from a freshman physics lab. No 16 (or whatever) Tesla field needed.

    3. Re:More than five things... by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Interesting, when you said strong, I though you meant STRONG. Of course, I can suspend gaseous oxygen without any magnetic field at all ;)

  53. the hell if I'm ever by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    eating corn bread out of your kitchen.

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  54. Re:why are the only interesting materials only flu by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

    They don't make it, they sell it. The guy that runs United Nuclear works at Los Alamos, and has for years, and has contacts that get him some scraps that he can sell.

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  55. Re:why are the only interesting materials only flu by munpfazy · · Score: 1

    >Dry ice is not a fluid.

    It's also a weirdly specific.

    Am I the only person who thinks something like "cryogens" would be a more natural addition to a list whose other members are dilatants, auxetic materials, superfluids, and ferrofluids?

    Sure, dry ice may be the cheapest and most readily available household cryogen, and that it sublimates is kind of cool, but every "neat" thing mentioned could be done with any cryogenic liquid. (Well, except the mosquito thing, which doesn't really have much to do with the properties of the dry ice at all.) What's more, there are plenty of neat things that you can do with colder materials that you can't do with dry ice.

  56. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by fireman+sam · · Score: 1

    Maybe he is the only hammer, feather, moon gravitational expert who reads slashdot. You know they (the HFMG members) have very busy social lives.

    BTW, if a hammer and a feather fall on the moon and nobody sees it, does anyone give a shit?

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  57. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference between theorectical physics and pratical physics...

  58. oobleck in the woofer by cathector · · Score: 1

    a couple years ago that video of the vibrating oobleck inspired me to duplicate it, but i didn't have a handy-dandy oscillating table. so i went out to the thrift store and bought a couple woofers for like $5, laid 'em on the floor facing up, put some saran-wrap on them, and poured in the oobleck. then hooked a moderately powerful amp up to a simple tone-generating app in the computer, and that was it! got some pretty decent creeping growing fingers.

  59. Re:why are the only interesting materials only flu by scottv67 · · Score: 2, Informative

    They don't make it, they sell it. The guy that runs United Nuclear works at Los Alamos, and has for years, and has contacts that get him some scraps that he can sell.

    Bob Lazar used to work at Area 51. I'm sure he has contacts who can make practically anything. It's a safe bet that only the "tame" stuff shows up in the United Nuclear catalog...

  60. cornflour cornstarch by jpellino · · Score: 1

    Except in nomenclature, as the British refer to cornstarch as cornflour.

    I can vouche for the difference on two fronts - I tired the corn flour sold in Carrefours in Nice and it was definitely not cornstarch and didn't work.
    As someone has learned the intricacies of gluten-free cooking, you can buy corn flour and use it in a celiac diet, and it's not corn starch, it's a separate thing.

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
  61. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by berzerke · · Score: 1

    The hammer is first to hit the ground.

    Only at temperatures above absolute zero. At absolute zero, inertial and gravitational mass are equal. Of course, as others have mentioned, we don't have instruments sensitive enough to see the difference even at normal (for us) temperatures.

  62. Re:why are the only interesting materials only flu by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

    God, I feel like a dope.. I didn't read the enough of the site and see the name Bob Lazar. My bullshit detector just went on high! Thanks for the update!

    --
    "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
  63. Hey retard by ArchieBunker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It said "below zero" and does not specify which scale. Below zero celsius and fahrenheit are easily attainable with liquid helium. Below zero kelvin is another matter.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Hey retard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Please read what the GP posted again.

      According to TFA, "To make a superfluid you must cool helium down to a couple of a degrees below zero - not one to try at home."

      It doesn't state anything about using helium to cool anything. It does mention cooling helium until it becomes a superfluid, which occurs just above absolute zero. The scale is implied, unless you know of a scale that has 0 just above the temperature in which helium becomes a superfluid.

  64. Maybe, maybe not by ConanG · · Score: 1

    I assume the height we are dropping the feather and hammer from is equal to their centers of gravity? I'm going to take a small liberty and specify the feather as a peacock feather (approximately 48 inches in length). I'm going to drop my feather oriented such that it's longest axis is pointed towards the center of the Moon. We must drop the hammer and feather from more than 24 inches in order to allow for the length of the feather. Assuming a perfectly spherical lunar surface, it will definitely hit the ground first.

  65. Re:cornflour cornstarch by Reziac · · Score: 1

    I don't know about elsewhere, but in the American livestock feed industry, "corn flour" is the extremely fine dust remaining from the production of cornmeal. It's essentially fine-ground whole corn, but the texture is about the same as cornstarch or cake flour. It's very digestible and is commonly used in livestock and pet foods, but in recipes I don't imagine it would behave the same as cornstarch.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  66. Water not on list? by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wonder which are safe to drink?

    Which makes you wonder why water isn't on the list. It may be ubiquitous, but it's weird. Think about it - how many other materials become less dense (ie. expand) when they freeze? I think there are about two or three known. How many others dissociate on their own in their liquid state? How many others have as big a specific heat? Think about the myriad things which are a result of those properties, some of which are a pain in the ass (cracked engine blocks if no antifreeze); some of which are boons (life in general - dissociation, frog hibernation - whole lakes don't freeze solid because ice is weird enough to float, water is one of the best coolants there is - specific heat).

    Water is truly a strange chemical. Think about that next time you blithely pour it down your throat.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  67. Putin on the ritz by Tablizer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Putin's Political Defense League bought up the whole lot of all 5.

  68. MMmmmMMmmm.. Acid. Fun Psychedelia. by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 1

    LSD is a pretty strange material.

    Anything that makes the concrete sidewalk light up under my feet like I'm in Saturday Night Fever is a pretty strange material indeed. Oh, the pretty colors. Fsck the aerogel, it can't do that.

    People talk about it like it's addictive. It's addictive like chocolate, not like nicotine or heroin: the only thing I miss is beautiful colors, more saturated and gorgeous than your eyes are capable of seeing, sort of like how chocolate is more rich and beautiful than your tastebuds can taste. (Nor was I an acid-head, but I did it a few times because I'm a fan of psychedelic music and I wanted to understand what the hell Yellow Submarine ("Oh my God! They're blue meanies!") was all about. I learned, I loved, I rejoice in understanding a time and place I was born too late to experience firsthand.)

    Note to anyone wanting to try it: Research reputable scientific sites (ie. FDA's advice on treating patients presenting with acid intoxication), chemistry sites (it would take a lot more rat poison than would fit in a couple of squares of blotter to hurt you let alone kill you), addiction sites (gets you as speedy high as, and is as additively dangerous as, drinking a medium double-double coffee), have a protective (and clean/sober) friend with you as a chaperon during the trip (and offer to do the same for him if he wants to try it), and find an old hippy who can get you good stuff. No, you won't stare at the sun - that would be at least as painful as if you did it clean. No, you won't suddenly believe you can fly, nor will you gouge your eyeballs out. No, you won't get acid flashbacks, unless your trip shows you something extremely traumatic (which is one of your brain's own fabrications anyway). No, acid is not stored in your fat - hell, it's one of the most water-soluble chemicals known and it will be completely out of your body in 24 hours. You are more lucid than you would be if you were stoned or drunk. If you see something unpleasant, remind yourself that it isn't real, and tell it to go away - it will. Most of what you hear about it is FUD based on anti-hippy propaganda. Acid screws with your visual cortex, nothing else.

    As a recovering alcoholic, caffeine fiend and smoker, I can assure you that if drug laws were based on actual damage done - or even damage-causing potential based on *scientific* criteria - all three of these things should have been outlawed far before acid.

    Ponies? No. Actual hallucinations will be more along the lines of colors which change with the sounds that you hear, and they'll follow outlines of things your eyes are seeing. (ie. sidewalk squares, each lighting up a different color; swirls and "lightning bolts" coming out of small objects in dark-colored contrasting fields, etc.)

    Look up the LD50 of LSD and compare it with ethanol (ie. drinking alcohol). Do the same with nicotine. Tell me which are the bigger toxins.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
    1. Re:MMmmmMMmmm.. Acid. Fun Psychedelia. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Ponies? No. Actual hallucinations will be more along the lines of colors which change with the sounds that you hear, and they'll follow outlines of things your eyes are seeing. (ie. sidewalk squares, each lighting up a different color; swirls and "lightning bolts" coming out of small objects in dark-colored contrasting fields, etc.)

      Well, there are times when those "visually enhanced" elements can take on a life of their own. It all depends on what's in one's subconscious. Generally I don't have many visual effects from acid, more distortions of the body and physical sensations. Some people get all kinds of strange visuals, though. But you are correct, LSD is a quite benign substance which is demonized far beyond its effects.

      Also, I was writing at the time, so there's no need to assume the ponies were visual, they could have been textual or literary ponies.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:MMmmmMMmmm.. Acid. Fun Psychedelia. by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted to try it, but one of the problems (other than being able to find the good stuff) is the chaperone. None of my friends are anywhere nearly big and strong enough to restrain me. I'd be the perfect chaperone for THEM, though. Oh well.

    3. Re:MMmmmMMmmm.. Acid. Fun Psychedelia. by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't worry about them needing to restrain you all they really need to do is hang around and tell you it's all cool every now and again.

      From my observations of people on acid you're really really deeply unlikely to become physically dangerous to anyone or to yourself.

    4. Re:MMmmmMMmmm.. Acid. Fun Psychedelia. by G-funk · · Score: 1

      If you're seeing things take on a life of their own, switch dealers. you're on shrooms not LSD. LSD is not an hallucinagen, it gives you synysthaesia, and messes about with your visual cortex (things will wobble, seem to move around, change colours with sounds and smells) but if you're seeing something that's not there at all, you've been gypped.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    5. Re:MMmmmMMmmm.. Acid. Fun Psychedelia. by dangitman · · Score: 1
      Not. Pure LSD can induce hallucinations. It acts on the brains - and people's brains are very powerful. Just because it acts in a certain way for you, that doesn't apply to everybody. Heck, some people hallucinate from smoking marijuana. It's all in the brain. There's nothing in LSD that prevents your brain from making images if you are so disposed.

      By the way, I don't use "dealers" I use chemists who know what they are doing. Screw the street crap, I like it pure and strong.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    6. Re:MMmmmMMmmm.. Acid. Fun Psychedelia. by G-funk · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless, LSD cannot induce hallucinations. Either you're not taking LSD, or you don't know the meaning of the word.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    7. Re:MMmmmMMmmm.. Acid. Fun Psychedelia. by dangitman · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless, LSD cannot induce hallucinations

      Yes it can. Where are you getting your information from?

      Either you're not taking LSD, or you don't know the meaning of the word.

      Huh? It means Lysergic Acid Diethylamide - but I'm not sure what that has to do with hallucinations. And I've definitely taken it.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    8. Re:MMmmmMMmmm.. Acid. Fun Psychedelia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes... I LOVE going to Bondi beach in Sydney and watching the shore lap up and down against the sea (and the results of waves going to the beach and continuing in the lights of the buildings). Best trip ever :)

  69. 1. Dilatants by _newwave_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    fluids that get more solid when stressed. The classic example is a mixture of cornflour and water - it's runny until you hit it when it becomes solid.

    I remember playing with this mixture in grade school and since then I have always wondered why materials like this could not be used to make protective/bullet proof armor. Could someone explain this to me?

  70. There are no laws of nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it apparently contravenes the laws of nature

    There are no laws of nature. Laws are made by Man.

    Nature does what she wants, without respecting any laws we might make up. That's why scientists have to continually revise their theories to be consistent with new observations. The concept of "natural laws" is completely at odds with science.

    1. Re:There are no laws of nature by KnuthKonrad · · Score: 1
      There are no laws of nature. Laws are made by Man.
      Could some "Man" than please remake Murphey's Law?
    2. Re:There are no laws of nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too many philosophy classes ... not enough science classes.

  71. empty calories by ukemike · · Score: 2, Interesting

    60 calories and 0 nutritional value. How is that a good thing? Wonder bread is to wheat as high fructose corn syrup is to corn. Wonder has almost no fiber. It is almost pure starch which is quickly converted into sugar in you digestive system. If you have low blood sugar and need a boost NOW eating a slice of wonder is faster than eating a powered sugar donut.

    --
    -- QED
  72. Transparent aluminium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  73. Oblig. Calvin and Hobbes by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    Tigers are classified as liquids.

  74. magic sand on youtube by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about magic sand?

  75. Missing option by Daetrin · · Score: 1

    Ice-9!

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  76. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    This is Slashdot. He was probably being completely serious.
    It's a cut and paste troll, I've seen it before on slashdot.
    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  77. Re:cornflour cornstarch by tehcyder · · Score: 1
    Except in nomenclature, as the British refer to cornstarch as cornflour.
    Ah, thanks, I was just getting to the stage as a UK slashdotter when I was going to ask someone what cornstarch was. The weird properties of (our) cornflour when mixed with liquid are well known and a source of endless amusement for kids of all ages.
    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  78. Re:Does it include the ever mysterious ethyl alcoh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be American - Any British person can still drive, perform the act of love and fight just fine after 6 pints. Get us up to 10 however...

  79. Wonderbread ACs eating Wonderbread by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

    No No No -- those are Anonymous Cannibals. Wrong acronym.

  80. Re:you definately dont work out then... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    yeah...and eating mcdonalds daily is ok too if you only eat half the fries
    and leave the corners of the bread off and have no mayo....come on already

    "And then he asked --Are you a bodybuilder???"

  81. first to go in blizzards by peter303 · · Score: 1

    We had two blizzards in December in my town. The processed, slice white bread was the first to be emptied from the shelves along with milk, eggs, and TV dinners.

    1. Re:first to go in blizzards by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      I've noticed the same odd buying pattern during storms 'round these parts, as well. I've always wondered what the hell these people are making out of bread, milk, and eggs when the power goes out? French toast?

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
  82. Re:why are the only interesting materials only flu by TheLink · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nah.

    Dry ice is sublime ;).

    --
  83. Re:you definately dont work out then... by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

    Seriously? There's someone that has a problem stopping after just 2 slices of Wonder Bread? Who gorges themselves on bread? That's crazy. There's pizza and beer to be had.

    If that last thing was directed at me, no, I'm not a bodybuilder, just a former fat guy. Not any part of which was due to bread. But maybe that's just me.

  84. Imagine getting laid on dilatants by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmmm....

  85. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nice copy and paste:

    to and old post

  86. 3vil? by Tabernaque86 · · Score: 1

    Is it wrong to want to create a transparent/translucent non-newtonian fluid, and substitute that into a high dive pool?

    Or even drop the cornstarch solution from one of those airplanes used for forest fires?

  87. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theorectical physics? What does a deity want with my arse?...

  88. Re:Hammer, Feather, Freefall on the Moon: Revisite by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    Even at 0K, the reasoning still stands.