Slashdot Mirror


Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming

Harmonious Botch wrote in with a CNN story that opens: "A spent Russian booster rocket re-entered the atmosphere Thursday over Colorado and Wyoming, the North American Aerospace Defense Command said. NORAD spokesman Sean Kelly said the agency was trying to confirm a report that a piece of the rocket may have hit the ground near Riverton, Wyoming, at about 6 a.m. Kelly said military personnel had not yet reached the scene. No damage was reported and the debris was not believed to be hazardous, NORAD said. Eyewitnesses reported seeing flaming objects in the sky at the time the rocket was re-entering, Kelly said."

265 comments

  1. In Soviet Russia... by PurifyYourMind · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wyoming hits rocket!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bravo :-).

    2. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In soviet russia rocket attacks you!

      Im serious it does....

    3. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 0

      we have a winner. This one cant be beat. Dont even try. It's too perfect.

    4. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Borat 2: Rocket Man - A film for make benefit glorious space program of Kazakhstan

  2. Take us to DEFCON 1 . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    . . . get the President on the horn.

  3. hmmm... by User+956 · · Score: 5, Funny

    No damage was reported and the debris was not believed to be hazardous, NORAD said. Eyewitnesses reported seeing flaming objects in the sky at the time the rocket was re-entering, Kelly said.

    Are they sure it wasn't just a weather balloon, or maybe some swamp gas?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:hmmm... by RealityMogul · · Score: 5, Funny

      REPEAT: The large chunks of flaming debris are NOT hazardous - feel free to run outside and try to catch them.

    2. Re:hmmm... by kimvette · · Score: 2, Funny

      6:00am? It was probably just Venus.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    3. Re:hmmm... by labeth · · Score: 1

      I assure you: it was nothing other than the planet Venus.

    4. Re:hmmm... by mrmeval · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Who is the asshat that prefilters my posts? Shitheel.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    5. Re:hmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been confirmed as swamp gas resulting from a bad case of swamp ass.

    6. Re:hmmm... by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Who is the asshat that prefilters my posts? Shitheel.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  4. Most misleading headline ever? by RexHowland · · Score: 4, Interesting

    For what the story is...

    The headline sort of makes you think of a Cold-War Russian rocket attack.

    At least, it made me think that. -- And I'd already heard about the story.

    1. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by Salvance · · Score: 1

      Yeah, talk about sensationalizing ... got my attention. Even so, 20 years ago this probably would have started WWIII, or at least fueled speculation of a WWIII by the talking heads.

      Putin and Bush's spats aside, I guess this means we're still on somewhat friendly terms with the Russians. Sure, space watchers saw it coming, but I bet there'd be a far greater degree of skepticism regarding Russian debris then than there is now.

      --
      Crack - Free with every butt and set of boobs
    2. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry.

    3. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess this means we're still on somewhat friendly terms with the Russians.

      Yeah 20 years it wouldve been 'World War three! Everybody hide! Canned food and shotguns!

      now its

      'Those crazy Russians! Theyre so wacky arent they?, Lol!'..

    4. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by Atomic6 · · Score: 1

      The accuracy of the title does not change the fact that it is sensationalist. And I'm sure everyone began reading the article immediately after reading the title.

      --
      "We have exactly as much freedom as we are willing to demand and as we can defend."
    5. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my first thought was, "Well gee, all my life I've been worrying about WW III, and when it finally happens, it doesn't even make the front page!"

    6. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by JWSmythe · · Score: 0, Redundant


          So....

          NORAD sees a rocket go up from Russia.

          NORAD sees an object come down from that rocket, towards the United States.

          NORAD aparently didn't advise the whitehouse that there was a launch, or that a potential first strike had just been launched.

          It's not unreasonable to believe that it could have been a first strike. How many countries don't exactly like the US right now? How many have the budget to buy an old russian ICBM where it sits? Oh ya, quite a few. If they were to do such a thing, obviously Russia wouldn't be doing it, so we wouldn't (hopefully) return fire on Russia, but whoever the enemy is did just get a first strike in.

          I'm glad we didn't nuke the planet over this. I have to wonder how many people were scrambling for their bunkers, while us civilians didn't hear anything about it until it made the news...

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    7. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by bs7rphb · · Score: 1

      IT'S A JOKE! You know, irony?

      Oh, never mind, this is slashdot.

    8. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by saider · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not unreasonable to believe that it could have been a first strike. How many countries don't exactly like the US right now? How many have the budget to buy an old russian ICBM where it sits? Oh ya, quite a few. If they were to do such a thing, obviously Russia wouldn't be doing it, so we wouldn't (hopefully) return fire on Russia, but whoever the enemy is did just get a first strike in.

      I'm glad we didn't nuke the planet over this. I have to wonder how many people were scrambling for their bunkers, while us civilians didn't hear anything about it until it made the news.


      The rocket was a commercial launch that was announced and observed a few weeks ago. The booster stages are simply returning to earth. NORAD and amateur astronomers have been tracking this from the get-go. Just because _you_ weren't informed does not mean that it is reasonable to believe it was a first strike.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    9. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You think that's misleading? Well, at least it wasn't "Russian Rocket Misses White House".

    10. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


          If a chunk of missile lands on my roof, and says UUCP, I'd think it was a first strike. :)

          I didn't see the little details about NORAD already knowing.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    11. Re:Most misleading headline ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people who think that headline is not misleading, advertisers must just love them.

  5. Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure those red commies are now peeing themselves from laughter going "Har har, we put rocket on amerikana soil for once"

    anyway, any idea what would have happened if it actually caused damage?

    1. Re:Right... by megaditto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      anyway, any idea what would have happened if it actually caused damage?

      If what happened to Canada is any indication, then nothing at all

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:Right... by p0tat03 · · Score: 1

      Disclaimer: I am Canadian.

      The US is smaller than Canada, but has over 10 times its population. The odds of something hitting a populated area in Canada is pretty small - it's not nearly as true for the USA. Not to mention that most of the US is quite hospitable, whereas a lot of northern Canada is just tundra - where deadly radioactive waste scattered across the frozen wastes probably won't harm all that many people. Try saying the same for radioactive waste littered all over the farms of Kansas.

    3. Re:Right... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      "Disclaimer: I am Canadian."

      Phew, you Canadians are modest, even disclaiming to be one...

  6. I for one by SonnyJimATC · · Score: 1

    Wondering where Kent Brockman lives, anywhere near here? (Very tenous, I know)

    1. Re:I for one by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Springfield, Oregon

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:I for one by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "It's a bit of a mystery, yes, but if you look at the clues, you can figure it out."

      http://www.snpp.com/guides/springfield.list.html

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
  7. Sensationalist title or what!? by syousef · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on. Try Russian space debris hits...not rocket. It hasn't been (part of) a rocket in some time...

    Oh wait, that'd actually be good journalism. Can't have that.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by uber_geek9 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Exactly. Sensationalism pisses me off like nothing else. You can call the story whatever you like -- it's not going to make it a bigger deal just because you make it sound scarier.

      But hey, it's only Slashdot. CNN's title was "NORAD looking for Russian rocket in Wyoming".

    2. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by bky1701 · · Score: 4, Funny
      CNN's title was "NORAD looking for Russian rocket in Wyoming".
      That title just makes me think NORAD is in bad need of a road map.
    3. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A spent Russian booster rocket re-entered the atmosphere Thursday over Colorado and Wyoming, the North American Aerospace Defense Command said. NORAD spokesman Sean Kelly said the agency was trying to confirm a report that a piece of the rocket may have hit the ground near Riverton, Wyoming, at about 6 a.m."

      Uhh? What sensationalism?

      How about you actually try to read the freaking article first before you start making assumptions about it without even seeing the article at all. Oh, wait, that would be too difficult for such a smart guy like yourself.

    4. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by muindaur · · Score: 1

      The problem is they would still get lost because they held the map upside down and didn't realize it.

    5. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by DilbertLand · · Score: 1

      Yep, sensationalism pisses me off too. It looks like some of the posters are starting to pick up nasty habits from the digg.com people.

    6. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Not that I disagree, but if it didn't work so god damn well they wouldn't do it.

    7. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by syousef · · Score: 1

      A rocket booster is not a whole rocket. A spent rocket booster is not a missle aimed at the US for the purpose of blowing things up.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    8. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by Joebert · · Score: 1
      But hey, it's only Slashdot. CNN's title was "NORAD looking for Russian rocket in Wyoming".

      Wait, so the reason we can't find any WMD is because they've been hiding them right under our nose ?
      Brilliant !
      I wouldn't have thought to look in Wyoming either.
      --
      Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
    9. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      >> Sensationalism pisses me off like nothing else.

      Uber_geek9 Enraged, Vows Bloody Vengeance on Headline Writers!!!

    10. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by zoefff · · Score: 1

      is Wyoming not in bad need of roads?

    11. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      Yeah... and here was me thinking the commies had finally invaded!

    12. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh wait, that'd actually be good journalism. Can't have that.

      Sadly that is about all you could expect from a writer like this it should be said.

      The Associated Press doesn't really seem interested in hiring good writers, I said.

      I have said before that they could really use writers that know how to construct paragraphs. I have also said that they could use a thesaurus.

      As I have said before the AP writes some of the most simplistic stories around, I said.

      You won't find good journalism or even an ounce of effort in AP stories, I have often said.

    13. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by Palshife · · Score: 1

      "Andre...are you telling me you guys lost another submarine?"

      --
      Attention deficit disorder is a complicated issue, spanning several major... HEY LET'S GO RIDE BIKES!
    14. Re:Sensationalist title or what!? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Sensationalism pisses me off like nothing else.

      "Hey, thanks for reading our sensationalist story and the extra ad impressions we sold via your comment."

      The best policy is to ignore the trolls, especially when they're the editors.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  8. How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    The title is: "Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming". Now let us see if it is in any way misleading.

    "Russian": The rocket is Russian. Nothing misleading here.

    "Rocket": The object in question is indeed the remains of a rocket. Nothing misleading here.

    "Hits": The rocket did indeed crash into the ground in Wyoming. It "hit" Wyoming, if you will. Nothing misleading here.

    "Wyoming": The location of the rocket crash was Wyoming. Nothing misleading here.

    I'm not sure how you justify your claim of the title being misleading. Every word in the sentence is correct and factual. The sentence as a whole is also completely correct.

    1. Re:How is it misleading? by RexHowland · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the key word is "hits," as opposed to "falls in," or "lands in."

      If you shoot an arrow, and the arrow "hits" the apple, you worry that something might have happened to the apple.

      If you shoot an arrow, and it "lands in" the forest... -- You're probably not too concerned for the forest.

      Maybe I'm just a stickler. -- I think it could be easily misunderstood, though.

    2. Re:How is it misleading? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Anonymous coward will not stop molesting badgers"

      Since the Anonymous coward never molested badgers in the first place, the above headline is correct. Simply because something is technically correct does not mean it is misleading. You might want to look at the difference between "mislead" and "lie" in the dictionary. Kind of reminds me of the RNC fund raising letter where "Bush cuts deficit 40% in two years". Factually correct, but does not mention that Bush caused the deficit in the first place.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    3. Re:How is it misleading? by Unlucke · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I think what RexHowland was referring to was "Rocket Hits," which to me sounds more like a planned destination rather then, what I assume to be, a mechanical failure of somekind (I basically skimmed throught the article) Optimists would most likely read "Crashes" instead of "Hits" ("Russian Rocket Crashes in Wyoming - Mechanical Failure Brings Rocket to Earth") Pessimists would probably read "Rocket" as "Missle" ("Russian Missle Hits Wyoming - Retaliation for Bush's Low IQ") That's just my take on the post. It's all about how you read the article, not what's typed.

    4. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Since the Anonymous coward never molested badgers in the first place

      Speak for yourself there, buddy. I'm proud of my family traditions.

    5. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the case at all. "Hit" is commonly referred to completely unplanned collissions.

      Take the phrase, "As we drove by the golf course, a golfball hit my windshield." Clearly, the driver of the car did not plan the collission, nor did the golfer who hit the ball into the windshield. The incident was much akin to what happened in Wyoming: a projectile impacted (ie. hit) it. The use of the word "hit" in no way suggests that it was an intentional or planned event.

    6. Re:How is it misleading? by megrims · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know.
      What if the arrow "lands in" your eye, for example?

      It's probably justified to be concerned for the state of an apple that an arrow lands in. Changing the victim to a forest is misleading.

      Of course the differing connotations of the two terms make it all a big mess anyway. Landing in terms of missiles gives a different impression than it would with a bullet or a loosed arrow.

    7. Re:How is it misleading? by uhlume · · Score: 0, Redundant

      The use of the word "hits" strongly implies targetting -- in this sense, the use of the word in the article headline is highly misleading/sensationalistic. I don't doubt the sensationalism was intended for humorous effect rather than to actively mislead Slashdot readers, however.

      --
      SIERRA TANGO FOXTROT UNIFORM
    8. Re:How is it misleading? by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 0
      What if the arrow "lands in" your eye, for example?


      The arrow does not "land in" your eye unless your eye has a 10 course landing strip. It does however strike you in your eyes.
    9. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it could be easily misunderstood, though.

      As with all MSM headlines, that was the editors' deliberate intent. It wasn't "false" and it wasn't "misleading", but many people will read it the wrong way and CLICK (they hope!) on the advertisements.

      Writing MSM "news" headlines for sites like slashdot is a careful process of misleading _just enough_ to make things sound worse than they really are, getting people to BUY, all without getting into too much trouble. On Internet "news" sites, BUY of course means "click on the ads".

      There's nothing more to it than that.

    10. Re:How is it misleading? by Jonnty · · Score: 1

      Something doesn't necessarily have to be factually incorrect to be misleading. For instance, a company may show pictures which suggest they are comparing their product and a similar one from a competitor, but then in the small print somewhere state that the one that you think is the competitor's product is actually a substandard copy. This is factually correct, but it misleads those who are not vigilant enough. While this title is factually accurate, 'rocket' actually suggests a whole rocket, and 'hits' reinforces the image that a whole rocket has hit part of Wyoming. A less misleading title would be something like 'Spent Russian Rocket Booster Falls Into Wyoming' or something more succinct to that effect.

      --
      Any grammatical or spelling errors above are for comic effect, and do not signify imperfection in the writer.
    11. Re:How is it misleading? by binarybum · · Score: 1

      i don't think you have any idea what misleading means.

      --
      ôó
    12. Re:How is it misleading? by GimliGloin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed... A better way of putting it is that the term "hits" implies that the Russians were "aiming" for us. The term "falls in" implies that it was a mistake which is what it was...

      John

    13. Re:How is it misleading? by GimliGloin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How about this statement? -> Joe Blow (fill in the name) NEVER denied that he molested children.... For people that would true statement but totally misleading...

      GSG

    14. Re:How is it misleading? by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The truly misleading word here is not "hit". The misleading word is "rocket". Had it said "rocket fragment", it would not have been misleading or particularly sensationalized to say that it hit Wyoming. In much the same way, saying "a busload of thirty people died today" is not the same thing as saying "the driver of a busload of thirty people killed himself today". :-)

      Could be worse. It could have said "Russian rocket explodes over Wyoming."

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    15. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all of your people are belong to us.

    16. Re:How is it misleading? by iminplaya · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down
      That's not my department," says Wernher von Braun

      --
      What?
    17. Re:How is it misleading? by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 2, Funny

      I suspect the rocket debris didn't politely touch down on a landing strip, either; so going by your distinction "hits" (or "strikes") is certainly more appropriate than "lands in". Wyoming could well be the equivalent of Planet Earth's eye. (Or some other part of its anatomy.)

    18. Re:How is it misleading? by Divebus · · Score: 1

      Tom Lehrer Lives!

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    19. Re:How is it misleading? by Divebus · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I believe Dr. von Braun also said "Nazi, Schmatzi"

      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    20. Re:How is it misleading? by Holmwood · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now a misleading headline would have been "As Democrats Take Power, Russian Rocket Hits USA".

      Hmmm. Let me go check Fox News.

      Holmwood.

    21. Re:How is it misleading? by durnurd · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how you justify your claim of the title being misleading. Every word in the sentence is correct and factual. The sentence is more than the sum of its parts. Context must be also be considered. If, for example, the headline were "Russian Head Seeks Arms" we could assume that:
      1. The President of Russia is looking for weapons, or
      2. Some floating head with Russian citizenship has grown tired of not being able to eat with a spoon.
      --
      --Edward Dassmesser
    22. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 0, Redundant

      But saying a rocket "lands" implies guidance. This rocket fell out of the sky.
      How about "Russian Rocket Crashes in Wyoming"?

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
    23. Re:How is it misleading? by davester666 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I believe the implication is that the rocket 'landing' in Wyoming is like landing in the forest. There's nothing in Wyomin to 'hit'. :-)

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    24. Re:How is it misleading? by TommyMc · · Score: 1
      Reminds me of the headline in the Evening Standard (London's "Quality" Newspaper) a few days ago.

      For those among us who've never visited London, the Evening Standard plasters it's headlines all over billboards outside any shop which sells it's paper and on street vendors outside tube and train stations.

      On Wednesday this read "HEALTH ALERT ON MARS BARS".

      The story? Mars will soon be putting nutrition information on it's packaging.

      Tabloid journalism. What would we do without it?

      --
      Stupid people think it's cool. Smart people thinks it's a joke; also cool.
    25. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Learn to spell "its" and we'll listen to you.

    26. Re:How is it misleading? by urbanradar · · Score: 1

      How about "Russian Rocket Crashes In Wyoming"?

    27. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the key word is "hits," as opposed to "falls in," or "lands in."

      "Crashes".

      Compare to the Concorde that *crashed* into a french hotel, and the two planes that *hit* the WTC. One is an accident, the other is a deliberate attack.

      "Falls" can work too, but "lands" also gives the purpose that it was done on purpose, just in a non-violent matter (i.e. it landed at the airport).

    28. Re:How is it misleading? by TommyMc · · Score: 1
      Learn to spell "its" and we'll listen to you.

      "Pedantry: stupidity that read a book"

      --
      Stupid people think it's cool. Smart people thinks it's a joke; also cool.
    29. Re:How is it misleading? by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 1

      AHA!

      I saw that too and was wondering what lie it was this time. I love their sensationalist billboard headlines. I think there should be a 'guess the real story' competition each day.

    30. Re:How is it misleading? by ultranova · · Score: 2

      Could be worse. It could have said "Russian rocket explodes over Wyoming."

      "Russian rocket strikes Wyoming. No casualty or damage reports have arrived yet. The military has been unable to reach ground zero. Eyewitnesses further away talk of a blazing fireball in the night sky. The president has not issued a statement yet."

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    31. Re:How is it misleading? by 21st+Century+Peon · · Score: 1

      I still remember the day there was a series of unrelated signal failures and train breakdowns on the Underground (far more so than usual), causing all sorts of palaver for commuters, last summer (IIRC). The Standard's front page coverage used the word "terror" no fewer than four times in the opening two paragraphs, as well as one in the headline.
      Gawd bless 'em... A London newspaper, whose correspondents clearly all hate living in London.

      --
      "Knowledge, sir, should be free to all!"
      ~Harcourt Fenton Mudd
    32. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No mushroom cloud? No problem then.

      -L

    33. Re:How is it misleading? by UglyTool · · Score: 1
      But doing that adds 5 letters to the headline, including two whole vowels! And an extra word!

      Think of all that work you are creating for the editors. Won't somebody, please, think of the editors?

    34. Re:How is it misleading? by Adam+J+Stone · · Score: 1

      August 6, 1945 Object Touches Ground An object was reported to have touched the ground in Hiroshima city today. Gravity was the confirmed cause of the object's apparent movement.

    35. Re:How is it misleading? by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      "The Russian ambassador could not be reached for comment" (I forgot to charge my cell phone last night)

      Rich

    36. Re:How is it misleading? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      That'd be a little misleading, because "Crash" connotes an unexpected, tragic event. This bit of booster was meant to reenter the atmosphere and hit something. True, it was probably hoped it'd hit an ocean instead of farmland or someone's house, but it was meant to come back to Earth.

      "Lands" is a little misleading because it connotes a safe touchdown. "Hits" when talking about a rocket connotes a target. "Comes to rest" just sounds silly in this context. "Plummets into" might be okay, I guess.

      This is why RFTA is suggested when a headline could be misinterpreted. A short snippet of text can be completely factually accurate and still interpreted to mean something utterly different than what was intended. Accuracy != precision.

      In other news, "American sailor rescued by Navy". Of course, it's not a U.S. Navy seaman, nor was it the U.S. Navy that rescued him. It was some guy doing a solo sailing trip, and he was rescued by the Chilean Navy. Kudos to the Chilean Navy, BTW.

    37. Re:How is it misleading? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      August 6, 1945Object Touches GroundAn object was reported to have touched the ground in Hiroshima city today. Gravity was the confirmed cause of the object's apparent movement. Errm, actually that object failed to hit the ground by 2000ft.
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    38. Re:How is it misleading? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      How about "Russian Rocket Debris Hits Wyoming", or "Russian Booster Rocket Debris Lands In Wyoming"? Sure, it's longer, but this isn't a newspaper. We can afford the extra words for the sake of clarity, and anything that reduces sensationalism...uh, never mind.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    39. Re:How is it misleading? by AlHunt · · Score: 1

      >Kind of reminds me of the RNC fund raising letter where "Bush cuts deficit 40% in two years". Factually correct,
      >but does not mention that Bush caused the deficit in the first place.

      Which was a poor analogy on your part. "Bush" did not cause any deficit - the so-called "balanced budget" of the Clinton admin was a myth in the first place. Alternatively, I could argue that congress caused any deficit because congress appropriates money.

      Too bad - you were doing great until you got to that last line and injected your personal agenda into your reply.

      All this is rhetoric, the original headline was intended to be attention grabbing. One might argue that it was an *abuse* of rhetoric. Rhetoric by itself is not a bad thing, it has simply gotten a bad reputation due to it's abuse, usually for political purposes.

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    40. Re:How is it misleading? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      I voted for Bush the first term. I receive information still from RNC because I have supported them in the past. If you cannot see his mishandling of finances, then you have issues with reality.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    41. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His spelling's not off, dipshit. He used an apostrophe inappropriately. If you're going to post asinine remarks, you should at least pick on the actual grammatical error.

    42. Re:How is it misleading? by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      The term "falls in" implies that it was a mistake which is what it was...

      Yeeesss, That's what they WANT you to believe...

      --
      What?
    43. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a silly news poll would have been "Poll: Bush is hero and villain of the year"

      Oh wait, CNN already did that one! :)

      How about when those in the media elite had the audacity to educate us common folk that the Iraq war has "officialy" collapsed into civil war?

      Can we take any news network seriously? Apparently not.

    44. Re:How is it misleading? by argel · · Score: 1

      How about this: "Russian rocket that was supposed to deconstruct over the Pacific hits Wyoming instead". I'm not seeing any sinister connotations for "hits" in that alternate and likewise not in the actual headline. Besides, do you really think Slashdot would have such a boring headline if it had really been a Russian attack?!?!

      --

      -- Argel
    45. Re:How is it misleading? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      While I agree that most slashdotters are not worried about Wyoming, I think "hits" is the better choice of words. Whenever I have heard or been part of any discourse on the subject of ballistic objects, the projectile has always "hit' or "missed" the target, as opposed to "landing on" the target. Any connotations of weapons or violence are themselves relics of the cold war.

    46. Re:How is it misleading? by serutan · · Score: 1

      Of course, the real question is whether Ghost Pirates are pirates who died and became ghosts, or ghosts who became pirates after they were already dead.

    47. Re:How is it misleading? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1


          Think about it in the context of an aircraft.

          When an aircraft lands, it makes a nice controlled contact with the ground.

          If it "hits" the ground, well.....

          If the russian rocket landed in Wyoming, that would be something completely different. :)

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    48. Re:How is it misleading? by zue · · Score: 1

      It is misleading! When I read the headline all I could think was "What does Pavel Bure have against Wyoming?"

    49. Re:How is it misleading? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about "Russian Rocket Debris Crashes In Wyoming"?

    50. Re:How is it misleading? by ic0wb0y · · Score: 1

      Remember when those atom bombs landed in Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

  9. Dupe! by naoursla · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is just a cover for the UFO story posted on slashdot the other day.

    1. Re:Dupe! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      This is just a cover for the UFO story posted on slashdot the other day.

      Or, it could be the other way around... (cue scarry music)

    2. Re:Dupe! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. The O'Hare UFO was actually the Blue Origin vehicle...this is a cover for something else...

  10. Poor Aim by edwardpickman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Today President Bush responded to the space attack by launching a counter attack on Boswanna. The Boswannan space program being seen as a threat to national security. He's also considering attacking the Moon for the unprovoked attack by Martian meteors on Antarctica thousands of years ago.

    1. Re:Poor Aim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, are you misspelling "Botswana" or really, really misspelling "Russia"?

    2. Re:Poor Aim by complete+loony · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... President Bush also sited secret evidence that conclusively proves the existence of Boswanna's dihydrogen monoxide enrichment program, though the country still claims these facilities are only used for humanitarian purposes ...

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    3. Re:Poor Aim by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      The CIA, though, still has not just found weapons of mass destruction, but also the nation of Boswanna, even after a spending a few millions on a fact-finding trip to Africa.

  11. Red Dawn by Greventls · · Score: 1

    I thought Reagan ended the cold war? Who is joining me in the wilderness to fight the Red Army? We obviously can't call ourselves the Wolverines though.

    1. Re:Red Dawn by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      I'm not joining you unless we have a cool name. Otherwise what's the point?

    2. Re:Red Dawn by EveLibertine · · Score: 1

      How about the Mongooses? That's a good team name. "The Fighting Mongooses." Yeah!

    3. Re:Red Dawn by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I don't think Partick Swayze is doing much theese days, give him a ring....

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    4. Re:Red Dawn by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      How about the Mongooses? That's a good team name. "The Fighting Mongooses." Yeah!

      Wouldn't that be... "The Fighting Mongeese"?

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

  12. Video from Denver news station by theinfobox · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is video taken by a local news crew this morning: ABC 7 Note: They use an embedded Windows Media Player.

    1. Re:Video from Denver news station by PeelBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      My god how did they get the rocket to use that piece of junk media player?

    2. Re:Video from Denver news station by bgeerdes · · Score: 3, Informative

      There is better footage at the local Fox station.

    3. Re:Video from Denver news station by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      They didn't. Why do you think it crashed in the first place?

  13. In other news Wyoming high schoolers unite.. by Bamafan77 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wyoming High School students unite to fend off Russian invasion. Fortunately, Hollywood has taught us exactly how to deal with such things.

    1. Re:In other news Wyoming high schoolers unite.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wolverines!

    2. Re:In other news Wyoming high schoolers unite.. by mattthateeguy · · Score: 1

      Hey! I am from Wyoming High School! (no joke)

    3. Re:In other news Wyoming high schoolers unite.. by Adriax · · Score: 1

      Wyoming High School students unite to fend off Russian invasion.
      All 70 of them.
       
      What, you think I'm joking? I'm from there.
      Frankly they wouldn't even need 70, 6inches of hard packed mud armoring their trucks and more guns than people by a factor of atleast 5 makes wyoming the dumbest place in america to attack.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    4. Re:In other news Wyoming high schoolers unite.. by seventhc · · Score: 0

               0
              \|/
               x
              / \ WOLVERINES!!!
           

      --
      'sig' deleted due to the stupidity of it's 'nature'
  14. Saw video on the news by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Somebody got some really good video footage of this thing breaking up in the atmosphere. It was a series of streaks of fire against a dark sky. Probably just a matter of time before it starts showing up on youtube, etc.

    1. Re:Saw video on the news by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Somebody got some really good video footage of this thing breaking up in the atmosphere

      It was a TV news helicopter crew, actually. They were already up in the air, and had camera gear. The footage is quite cool.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Saw video on the news by trcooper · · Score: 1

      I saw this yesterday morning in Omaha, NE. At the time I thought it was a plane, but it was out of place for anything with their landing lights on. Way to far west for anything approaching either Omaha eppley or Offutt AFB. When I read the story yesterday, the time matched up, as did the position.

      Didn't look quite like the video from here, more like a very bright light, but still cool to see in person.

  15. Increased Space Traffic + Debris = First Strike by Random+Q.+Hacker · · Score: 0, Redundant

    With Russia's increase in commercial space traffic, they now have excellent cover to leave nukes disquised as debris in a decaying orbit. With very subtle changes in orbit they can cause the "debris" to come down in the middle of any major US city. We won't realize it until it is too late.

    1. Re:Increased Space Traffic + Debris = First Strike by megaditto · · Score: 1

      Newsflash: They don't have to hide nukes from us. Even with a clear 40 min launch warning, it would still be too late!

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    2. Re:Increased Space Traffic + Debris = First Strike by SnakeStu · · Score: 0, Troll

      Hmm, I don't know about that. We saw some pretty effective city evacuation with Katrina. With a 40 minute warning, we could save, oh, I don't know, maybe tens, even dozens of people...

      (And, of course, it wouldn't be too late at all for a retaliatory strike from mobile platforms.)

    3. Re:Increased Space Traffic + Debris = First Strike by drgonzo59 · · Score: 1

      They probably already did this, the sats with nuclear devices in orbit are very effective for the EMP effect when detonated. Dropping them down will probably not be too hard...

    4. Re:Increased Space Traffic + Debris = First Strike by dbIII · · Score: 1

      You need a reason to do expensive things and then keep expensive secrets. Why would they bother?

    5. Re:Increased Space Traffic + Debris = First Strike by Carewolf · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You need the presidential approval for a nucular retaliation strike. He could be unavailable if... for instance he is being reading a book about a girl and her goat.

    6. Re:Increased Space Traffic + Debris = First Strike by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      And don't forget the time it takes him to let the news sink in. I mean, it took him like 5 Minutes to come to rationalize it when a plane hit a house, now extrapolate to a nuke hitting a town!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  16. "...No damage was reported..." by NoseBag · · Score: 4, Funny

    "...No damage was reported..."

    Well, duh! It's Wyoming, fer christsake.

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
    1. Re:"...No damage was reported..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The city I live in has a larger population than Wyoming.

    2. Re:"...No damage was reported..." by edwardpickman · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do you mean, there was substantial damage. 10 sq ft of grass was destroyed and several jackrabbits were frightened by the debris. A legal team is organizing a class action suit on the rabbits' behalf.

    3. Re:"...No damage was reported..." by guabah · · Score: 1

      What?

      Didn't you get the memo?

      The end of the world will probably start in Wyoming.

    4. Re:"...No damage was reported..." by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Most likely the only person living within 100 miles was hit and killed, so nobody was close enough to report.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:"...No damage was reported..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those were jackalopes, your insensitive clod !

    6. Re:"...No damage was reported..." by DMoylan · · Score: 1

      take your pick

      $50 worth of damage

      $100 worth of improvements

  17. Home on the Range by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh give me a home
    Where the buffalo roam
    And the deer and the antelope play

    Where seldom is heard
    a discouraging word
    and the skies are not full of spent Russian booster rockets

    1. Re:Home on the Range by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Shorter version:

      Oh give me a home
      Where the buffalo roam
      And the {crunch!}

    2. Re:Home on the Range by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      'Mid the yuccas an' the thistles
      I'll watch the guided missiles
      While the ol' FBI watches me (yee-hoo!)...

      Chris Mattern

    3. Re:Home on the Range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you hear? They paved over the range and outsourced jobs to the deer and the antelope. But, you know, if you're looking for somewhere without discouraging words, I got this great place. It's called Oceania...

      P.S. The rocket's probably some delayed-retaliation scheme from the Cold War. Just a test, the next one'll have a warhead.

    4. Re:Home on the Range by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I just wanted to let you know that this was the funniest thing I've read on Slashdot in a while. I kept reading and reading on, wondering where the funny lyrics were, and then the final line bashed my head in. Nice job.

    5. Re:Home on the Range by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, give me a clone
      Of my own flesh and bone
      With its Y-chromosome changed to X
      And when it is grown
      Then my own little clone
      Will be of the opposite sex.

      (Chorus)
      Clone, clone of my own,
      With your Y-Chromosome changed to X
      And when I'm alone
      With my own little clone
      We will both think of nothing but sex.

  18. More info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    From Spaceweather.com

    Something from space disintegrated over Denver, Colorado, this morning around 6:20 am MST (1320 UT). Witnesses describe it as "brilliant, slow, twinkling, sparkly and full of rainbow colors." It was not a meteor. The fireball was the decaying body of a Soyuz U rocket that launched the French COROT space telescope on Dec. 27th. The re-entry caused no damage on the ground--just a beautiful display in the sky.

    1. Re:More info by Voice+of+Meson · · Score: 5, Funny
      Witnesses describe it as "brilliant, slow, twinkling, sparkly and full of rainbow colors."
      It was a Gay Pride parade?
      --
      Dammit! I had a good one.
    2. Re:More info by doubleu606 · · Score: 1

      well, Riverton is where the Brokeback Mountain boys used to retreat to!

    3. Re:More info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well duh, TFA said they were "flaming..."

  19. Missles heading for New York by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Film at 11....

  20. Umm... link to video? by lpangelrob · · Score: 4, Informative

    Link. This story could use a visual. Clearly, as opposed to what the poster of the video would like us to think, it is not a UFO.

    1. Re:Umm... link to video? by drewzhrodague · · Score: 1

      it is not a UFO.

      It is also not a truck.

      --
      Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  21. Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Neither Boswanna or the Moon has any oil. And at least one of those places doesn't even really exist!

    Love,
    George
    POTUS

    1. Re:Bullshit! by PeelBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wish I didn't already respond to this article because I still have mod points. The GP was kind of funny just because I can laugh at that kind of thing but the whole bush went to war because of oil thing is obviously (to anybody who has half a clue?) bull shit.. Let me know when the extra oil starts rolling in I'm looking forward to the day because then atleast we could fucking say we got SOMETHING out of the deal.. Don't you think?!

    2. Re:Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's a hint: when you lose a war, you don't get the spoils. Bush lost in Iraq, hence he doesn't get the oil.

      Don't kid yourself for an instant about the many reasons and potential rewards (and if you do, you're a fool for thinking so simplistically about the reasons for going to war and spending $350 billion dollars); we're talking a stronger American presence in the Middle East, military bases and a launching point against neighboring countries that may prove troublesome, proceeds from exclusive contracts with Iraqi oil companies and the government, a belief that the war machine would pump up the American economy, the delusion that democracy would spread through the Muslim world and bring peace to a tumultuous region, intimidation of countries that might resist US policy, the maintenance of the US military and its funding in a period of post-Cold War decline, and the power that consolidates in the executive during a time of war that can be used to control huge parts of the country (how many times have you heard "You don't question the president during a time of war" on topics totally unrelated to the actual war?).

      Yeah, talk about half a clue. I'm glad to see you're tuned into the nuances of government. Any critical thinking beyond the most simple and limited of steps seems beyond the reach of most Americans.

    3. Re:Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lost what war? Last time I checked Sadam's dead and Iraq's now a democracy. If that's a defeat then I guess the US has lost a lot of wars.

    4. Re:Bullshit! by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      You got me... I got no idea what he's talking about.

      Good thing he isn't President, huh?

    5. Re:Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must spend most of your life watching Fox News. Iraq currently has a fragile joke government with no credibility that is on the verge of exploding at any moment and plunging the entire country into an outright civil war that even Georgie can't deny. A democracy must be sustained by the people - how long do you think it will be after the US pulls out before the government falls apart?

      The US and Britain went in under completely false pretences, with a unrealistic view of the forces required to do the job (at least of the the part of the American forces under the idiot Rumsfield - the Brits were more pragmatic, but were overruled), and more importantly, the forces required to stabalize the region after creating a massive power vacuum.

      There is no happy way out of this mess for the US. So tell me how it is that we won? Sure, we destroyed a military that had no significant battlefield capability against US and British forces and not much motivation or loyalty, but that isn't the same as winning.

    6. Re:Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Iraq's now a democracy

      Just like in all the other democracies, they have a puppet for a head of state.

    7. Re:Bullshit! by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Informative

      You missed the point with Iraq. It was never about getting our hands on more oil it was about controlling oil. Notice that years later oil is still flowing at a trickle when it was supposed to pay to rebuild Iraq. It was about restricting oil to drive up prices. Oil won't flow so long as the US is in control. I'm an american and this isn't paranoia it's a simple fact. The oil ministry was the only governmental office protected yet four years after the war was declared over the oil industry in Iraq ia at a near standstill and they have become a net importer of oil not an exporter inspite of having some of the largest reserves in the world. The oil will magically flow once the prices are perminately up and the middle east can no longer supply what we need. Like I say it's about controlling oil.

    8. Re:Bullshit! by thedeviluknow · · Score: 0, Troll

      "If that's a defeat then I guess the US has lost a lot of wars." The US has lost a lot of wars, Vietnam ring any bells? War of 1812? That however, is beside the point, Iraq is as close to complete and total explosion as any Mid East nation since Iran under the Shah; the war has added to the political polarization globally and dramatically increased the number of dedicated anti US terrorists in many nations around the world, THIS is not a victory, it is a complete and total loss on a scale not seen before. Vietnam fell to Soviet backed revolutionaries; Iraq has been taken from the US by a loose collection of still novice resistance fighters. How embarrassing for her invaders. How tragic for her people.

    9. Re:Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You missed the point with Iraq. It was never about getting our hands on more oil it was about controlling oil. "

      Umm...

      If you wanted to control anything in Iraq you would do it via Saddam. That's what he was put in place by the Americans for. And at the end of the day he would do what the Americans wanted. If he didn't, it was open to the US to have him replaced with another puppet who would do the same job.

      So why didn't the US do this? Because it wasn't about oil in any shape or form at all. It was about re-electing Bush.

      Bush had a disastrous Home policy (remember ENRON) and a disastrous Foreign policy, culminating the the WTC incident. He was not going to get re-elected. The only way he could manage this was by having a war and riding in on patriotic fervour. This is why we had a war with no aim - the point was just to have the war, kill lots of sub-human foreigners and then go home (after the election).

      If you give democracy to Iraq you give the oil fields to the Shiites - a theocratic group who look to Iran for support. Is this a credible US aim?

      Look at the war so far - really no one knows what it's for or what would count as a victory or ending. Oil was only an issue insofar as it helped the neocons argue that the war could be paid for by stealing Iraqui oil. The idea that America will keep oppressing the Iraquis and refusing to let them pump oil until the Middle East runs out of oil is risible - are we going to stay there 20 years?

    10. Re:Bullshit! by Real1tyCzech · · Score: 0

      The US has already turned 3 of the 18 provinces of Iraq to total Iraqi control. We fully expect to have most of the rest turned over by the end of the year.

      I love hearing from the folks who think the goal in Iraq is stability. When was the last time any country in that region was "stable"? They've been at war, or at the very least, forced peace on fear of annihilation for over 1400 years. Anyone who thinks the goal is stability did not pay attention in their History classes. So long as there are Palestines vs Jews, and Shia vs. Sunni, there will be conflict and instability in the Middle East. Period. Full Stop. End of Story.

      I actually agree with you on the false pretenses. WMD's were a poor justification. Saddam himself and the simple fact that folks like him don't go away, they get worse, would have been more than enough.

      Our goals entering Iraq were to find and remove any supposed WMDs (done, since they likely weren't there to begin with) and depose Saddam, replacing his regime with a democratic government. How have we *not* won, or at the very least, come very close at this point to it?

    11. Re:Bullshit! by JavaLord · · Score: 1

      the whole bush went to war because of oil thing is obviously (to anybody who has half a clue?) bull shit.. Let me know when the extra oil starts rolling in I'm looking forward to the day because then atleast we could fucking say we got SOMETHING out of the deal.. Don't you think?!

      You shouldn't get into the line of thinking that anyone who agrees with you 'has a clue' and anyone who doesn't must be clueless.

      Anyway, the Iraq war was about more than just oil. It was mostly about the neoconservative/PNAC foreign policy. They tried to pressure Clinton into fighting a war against Iraq too. It's about more than just oil, it's about American military dominance, and the safety of Israel. After 9/11 these people basically converted Bush, who came into office with little to no foreign policy. Of course, now they all blame Bush for what happened, even though they claimed before the war that Iraq would be a cakewalk, and they pushed for it even before Bush was in office.

    12. Re:Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That war was about oil alright, just not in the way you think. Iraq had started selling that oil for euros instead of dollars. That problem didn't take long to rectify after the liberation of Iraq. How do you think the USA is able to sustain such a huge trade deficit? Hint: it's not by promoting the euro.

      The threats to Iran were made for exactly the same reason.

      One last thing to think about: If this was all really about WMDs, then why isn't north korea being invaded? They even bragged about developing WMDs!

    13. Re:Bullshit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So these neoconservatives, you wouldn't mean Cheney & Wolfowitz?

      As I understood it, they were actively working to divert attention from Al Quaeda, to start a war against one of Al Quaeda's more bitter enemies (Saddam), THE DAY AFTER 9/11. I accept that Bush lacks the nouce to have really followed this. This doesn't change the fact (& the point) that they had access to Bush because they were his team.

      The military had always indicated that Cheney's figures for the required personnel & equipment bordered on the delusional. The war on Iraq part 2 was Cheney's war. It was done Cheney's way & for Cheney's purposes. The complete domination of all other countries, (free & democratic or otherwise) by the USA. You could call the result karma. Either way, Cheney is Bush's boy. Don't separate Cheney from the administration that enabled him.

      For further reading I refer you to http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article15 44.htm

  22. Just remember, everyone... by dubdays · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...duck and cover.

    1. Re:Just remember, everyone... by dubdays · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's a link for those of you who may not get it. I should have included it originally. Sorry.

    2. Re:Just remember, everyone... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      You know, the "educational" video to that is scarier than the whole incident.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  23. Mmmmmmmm rockets. by edflyerssn007 · · Score: 1

    I just got finished reading the article about how Bush was about to start opening everyone's mail, and then news of a Russian rocket hitting Wyoming. I'm like great, now there's an emergency and Bush is gonna start opening our mail.

    It's like the cold war, except they actually hit us.

    I know its not an attack, but it would be kinda ironic.

    -Ed

    --
    So you see what had happened was....
    1. Re:Mmmmmmmm rockets. by PeelBoy · · Score: 1

      Fuck it! I decided to read your email anyway. Dude you really need to get surgery for that thing, and about your babies momma.. Fuck what she said.... The bitch is crazy... Besides.. I read her email too and it turns out she is preg *again* with some other dude.. Man I feel sorry for THAT guy haha. And no.. It doesn't look like she's gonna give you the car back. Sorry.

  24. The Truth: One less Ori Ship... by sjs132 · · Score: 1

    Thanks Colonel Mitchell! Keep up the good work!

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  25. /. is so slow on this story... by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 0, Troll

    ...I already made fun of it hours ago. Pretty sad when a stupid little joke site beats the news site. On the other hand, had this been an actual attack, I wouldn't have made fun of it, and /. still wouldn't have posted the story as the editors would have been heading for the hills.

  26. Video showed on Fox News earlier by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 3, Informative

    Space Junk: Norad identifies Denver light as body of Russian rocket re-entering the atmosphere

    View

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
    1. Re:Video showed on Fox News earlier by Sporkinum · · Score: 3, Funny

      DEVO

      She was walking all alone
      Down the street in the alley
      Her name was sally
      She never saw it
      When she was hit by space junk
      In new york miami beach
      Heavy metal fell in cuba
      Angola saudi arabia
      On xmas eve said norad
      A soviet sputnik hit africa
      India venezuela (in texas
      Kansas)
      Its falling fast peru too
      It keeps coming
      And now Im mad about space junk
      Im all burned out about space junk
      Oooh walk & talk about space junk
      It smashed my babys head
      And now my sallys dead

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    2. Re:Video showed on Fox News earlier by saned · · Score: 1

      Is this the same NORAD that couldn't track and intercept 4 (four!) commercial airplanes flying wildly off-course in September 11th 2001? Hmm...

      -saned

      --
      signal_connect(0, "test_top.dut.my_sig", "clk");
  27. Follow-up by FunWithHeadlines · · Score: 1

    And yes, before anyone who visits my site today says so, it was a slow news day, I myself didn't care all that much for my jokes today, but as Groucho said in Animal Crackers, 'Not all the jokes can be good ones. You've got to expect that once in a while.' Hit the archives for better material.

  28. So, when ARE you going to stop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've heard that YOU, Anonymous Coward, have been molesting badgers...

  29. red dawn by minus_273 · · Score: 2, Funny

    oh no! now only Patrick Swayze can save us like in that 80s documentary!

    --
    The war with islam is a war on the beast
    The war on terror is a war for peace
  30. Dead Like Me by tekrat · · Score: 3, Funny

    I hope Ellen Muth wasn't in the area..
    (For reference, her character (George) was killed by a piece of debris from the de-orbiting of Mir)...

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:Dead Like Me by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I wasn't the only person who immediately thought of DLM....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Dead Like Me by PeDRoRist · · Score: 1

      Namely, she was hit by MIR's toilet seat.
      It always cracked me up.

      --

      Anything you do can get you slashdotted, including nothing.
    3. Re:Dead Like Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Namely, she was hit by MIR's toilet seat.
      It always cracked me up."

      And it was down hill from there on. it is a bad sign when a TV series peaks in the first 5 minutes of the pilot.

  31. A better subject line... by dghcasp · · Score: 3, Funny
    BREAKING NEWS:

    Extremely slow Soviet ICBM hits US one month after launch and over ten years after breakup of the Soviet Union.

    Film at 11

  32. I'm thinkin Ebay! by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    If I lived around the impact zone, I'd be thinkin Ebay :-D If I remember correctly, people tried to sell off parts the last time something like that landed in the US but a lot got poisoned and stuff cuz it was hazardous

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  33. Re:The Truth: One less Ori Ship... by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Russia, the Ori hallow you!

  34. Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming! by SQLz · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Bush lanuches back!! Its global war!

    1. Re: Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming! by plopez · · Score: 1

      Invades Canada!

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re: Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bush lanuches back!! Its global war! The fact that post was labeled as "1, Redundant" just made my day.
  35. Putin called a news conference by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Funny

    My fellow Russians, I'm pleased to tell you today that I've signed legislation that will outlaw Wyoming forever. We begin bombing in five minutes.

    1. Re:Putin called a news conference by Skidmarq · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Left your mic on did you? Nice reference! ;)

      --

      "I don't think I ain't" -Thompson's Corollary to Descartes

  36. Rocket Seen 6:14am over Billings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    2 of my coworkers and I saw the rocket burning before it began splitting up at Billings Logan International Airport in Montana. It split into 3 pieces south of us before going out of sight. It sure was pretty cool to see-- about 1/4 the size of the full moon that was out.-- JB, Billings, MT

  37. missle defense system? by mabu · · Score: 2, Funny

    So much for any notion of a warning system for missiles eh?

    1. Re:missle defense system? by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why would you assume that NORAD wasn't tracking it?

    2. Re:missle defense system? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Experience with the general state of the US defense system, I guess.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:missle defense system? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      You must not have much experience with it in that case.

    4. Re:missle defense system? by mabu · · Score: 1

      Considering how fast the Feds reacted to 9/11 or Hurricane Katrina, I think it's safe to assume some time next week they'll have a meeting to discuss "WTF that was in the sky??"

    5. Re:missle defense system? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Right. Always good to see a member of the "I WANT IT MY WAY AND I WANT IT RIGHT NOW!" culture. I'm not going to get drawn into another pointless discussion of Katrina. Suffice it to say that the Fed response was as timely and efficient as circumstances allowed, and was a damn sight better than anything that any other country could accomplish in similar circumstances. That people like you have chosen to use this disaster as another opportunity to cast spurious accusations against the Bush administration is truly despicable.

  38. Piece of Alien Space Ship Hits New Jersey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Russian space junk hitting cow land is nothing. A real piece of alien SUV technology hit New Jersey. Did anyone notice that right off it was said not be part of a plane ? The pictures I have seen seems to look like some type of superalloy and my crude calc of the density puts it near materials used in jet engines. Anyone else do the math ? Things about 2.5" long 1" diameter and weighs 13oz.

    1. Re:Piece of Alien Space Ship Hits New Jersey by Anpheus · · Score: 0

      Just imagine what function this deformed and round piece of unknown metal performs in the UFO! It could be the core to a poor gyroscope! It could be some sort of misshapen weapon meant to inflict damage upon suburban homes!

    2. Re:Piece of Alien Space Ship Hits New Jersey by DM78 · · Score: 1

      ... or it might just be a previously-molten chunk of a Kazakhstani launch vehicle. As for the possible extra-terrestrial encounter at O'Hare, I'd certainly like to say that they definitely inspected the most boring city on the planet, next to Milwaukee and Bismarck.

    3. Re:Piece of Alien Space Ship Hits New Jersey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you have never been to Cleveland.

    4. Re:Piece of Alien Space Ship Hits New Jersey by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      Yes, John Bigbooty, that's what we want them to think!

  39. Hmm, what about in NJ by sideswipe76 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    recently a large chunk of metallic rock crashed into a house in NJ and embedded itself into the wall. Coincidence? I think not.

  40. fucking russians, can't they do anything right ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a once in a decade chance to take out the US president (moron in chief, sorry) and they *MISS*...

  41. Nuke 'em by lelitsch · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Damn commies.

    ------------
    And screw the lameness filter, I want to be lame right now.

  42. Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wyoming?

    How did they know?

    1. Re:Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming by Buelldozer · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn you damn communists!

  43. Dick Cheney's from Wyoming... by cojsl · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where the men are men, and the sheep are.... threatened by falling space debris??

  44. not believed to be hazardous ? by Easy2RememberNick · · Score: 1

    "and the debris was not believed to be hazardous"

      A ton of hot metal falling out of the sky going Mach 1 is certainly not hazardous...it's lethal.

    1. Re:not believed to be hazardous ? by EveLibertine · · Score: 1

      Better yet is the usage of the word "was". The debris was not believed to be hazardous. But now it has transformed into a giant robot and is currently rampaging through downtown Milwaukee.

    2. Re:not believed to be hazardous ? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1

      It's not dangerous if you follow this rule of thumb: Don't stand in the path of fast flying objects.

  45. Ship's Log... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The captain came on deck. He was not drunk.

  46. Good luck finding it now... by cjsnell · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's been snowing like mad all day.

  47. Misleading by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Misleading does not necessarily involve actual falsehood. In fact, that's pretty much why we use the word "Misleading" instead of "Deceiving." To differentiate between outright fraud and the most dangerous of all lies: the one your victim tells himself.

    For instance, When President Clinton went on national television and told an audience, "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky," while shaking his hand at an elderly woman in the front row, it was obvious to any observer that he was not actually disclaiming the possibility of having had sexual relations with Ms. Lewinsky.

    In fact, the structure of that particular sentence would seem to imply that he was telling ms. Lewinsky that he didn't have relations with the old lady in the audience. A statement which has the virtue of bearing no individual falsehood whatsoever.

    He did, however, by those completely truthful words, lead people to the mistaken conclusion of the absence of improper sexual conduct toward an underling.

    Regardless of what one thinks of Clinton's behavior however, the statement, "Russian Rocket Hits Wyoming," while technically factual, is unnecessarily inflammatory nonetheless.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  48. Re:Extreme Right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, than the Russian had attacked USA soil, We need to liberate all those oppressed Russians. The dictator Putin and all his oil and natural gas will no stop Our will for a Free Russia. God Bless USA.

  49. Aw Cowpies! by ahayes_m · · Score: 0

    Now we're going to have all sorts of conspiracy theorists right here in WYO... and I though our lack of population shielded us from such things.

    1. Re:Aw Cowpies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe your lack of population should scare you enough due to the risk of inbreeding.

  50. The Old Adage... by AnotherUsername · · Score: 1, Funny

    There are lies, damn lies, and Slashdot postings...

    --
    I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    1. Re:The Old Adage... by MeanderingMind · · Score: 1

      While some might not consider this funny, I hardly think the parent is a troll.

      Anyway, I laughed.

      --
      Thunderclone: ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE! ONE MAN ENTERS! TWO MEN LEAVE!
    2. Re:The Old Adage... by AnotherUsername · · Score: 0

      Hmmm....it was meant to be humorous...thank you for laughing, at least. It wasn't meant to be a troll comment. Some people don't seem to find my style of humor funny, apparently.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
  51. A stickler you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But with all that evidence, well my word! it almost makes it sound like... sensationalism!!

  52. Untrue... by thrill12 · · Score: 1

    ...it *is* a UFO: unidentified flying object.

    Why does everyone thinks of aliens when the word UFO is mentioned ?

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:Untrue... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      But it is not "unidentified".

    2. Re:Untrue... by scheming+daemons · · Score: 1
      ...it *is* a UFO: unidentified flying object.

      Why does everyone thinks of aliens when the word UFO is mentioned ?

      No... it's an IFO. We KNOW what it is... it has been identified.

      Actually... it *WAS* and IFO. Now it is an IFFO (Identified, formerly-flying object).

      --
      "I have as much authority as the pope, I just
      don't have as many people who believe it" - George Carlin

  53. Not hazardous? by AaronLawrence · · Score: 1

    How about the story that ran last year about how Kazakhstan and Siberia were littered with highly-toxic remains of rockets? IIRC this was due to the poisonous hydrogolic (self-igniting) fuels many of the Russian rockets still use. If this was an upper stage especially.

    --
    For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert. - Arthur C. Clarke
    1. Re:Not hazardous? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's "hypergolic" to you. Water has nothing to do with it.

  54. Re: poison eh? by goga_russian · · Score: 0

    now Thats Funny ! come on touch the peices.. , yeah there ja go.. now taste them... hmm? no> ok maybe let your 'smarter' friend try... ah, love that fuel. some villagers in Kazahstan tried to sell it off for cash as metal... many did not make it. some are pissed till this day that the 3rd arm always itches.

    --
    Dont Judge The situation by the Misfortunate. Goga.
  55. coldwar scenario by chrisranjana.com · · Score: 0

    I bet they would have shot it down had it been 10 to 20 years earlier during the cold war period and of course a full length movie would have been made about it too.

    --
    Chris ,
    Php Programmers.
  56. Mixing Curse Levels by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    Those Godless, nickel stealing, toilet licking, straw sucking, red wearing, anti-American, ignorant, hack-bringing, country stealing, president converting, 5-year planning, backwards talking, astronaut suffocating, satellite launching, Afghan invading, Cuban Corrupting, gosh-darned commies are at it again. *Grabs gun* "Let's shoot these mother *******."

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  57. I think I hear a little girl saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... They're heeeeeere!

  58. film... by jonnystiph · · Score: 0, Redundant

    at eleven

    --

    If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

  59. Whereas the yanks dropped the whole lot on us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...back in 79. Skylab, the first US space station. The whole darn thing was dropped on us aussies with nary a 'sorry' from our northern hemisphere overlords.
    We had insurance companies selling policies for $20 million cover for being hit by it - seriously.

    1. Re:Whereas the yanks dropped the whole lot on us by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...back in 79. Skylab, the first US space station. The whole darn thing was dropped on us aussies with nary a 'sorry' from our northern hemisphere overlords.

      Ah, who cares about a bunch of convicts.

    2. Re:Whereas the yanks dropped the whole lot on us by SEE · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering why anybody would have bought the insurance. The U.S. and Australia are both parties to the Outer Space Treaty, and were back in 1979; all damages caused by the Skylab crash were accordingly the full financial responsibility of the United States.

    3. Re:Whereas the yanks dropped the whole lot on us by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      It wasn't deliberate. America didn't shoot Skylab down like Mir was shot down. The US gov. thought Skylab was in a parking orbit safe for eight years; unfortunately, it left orbit about three years early. They wanted a Space Shuttle to move it to a higher orbit, but the Shuttles weren't ready in time. (Two years late.) They even considered using a unmanned satellite to try to move Skylab, but that wasn't even built.
      Skylab wasn't brought down deliberately. It just fell out of the sky.
      That said, the gov. should've paid that fine for littering.
      http://www.wikipedia.com/wiki/Skylab

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  60. MAD by bWareiWare.co.uk · · Score: 1

    Well at least all that StarWars money was worth it. Wasn't the point of MAD that you were meant to be able to tell if Russian Rockets were going to hit *BEFORE* they actually did.

  61. The most exciting thing to happen in Wyoming by j3w · · Score: 1

    ...since we got some of them new fangled in-door out houses!

    Good luck finding it out there... someone off the windriver reservation probably already found it and traded it for a case of pbr and a pint of whiskey.

  62. Am I the only one wondering... by simm1701 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ... why the much vaunted US anti missile defense system didn't respond to this?

    Or since the radiological alarm not go off it was deemed not worth shooting at?

    --
    $_="Slashdotter";$syn="OTT";s;..;;;sub _{print shift||$_};s!ash!Perl !;s=$syn=ack=i;tr+LLEd+BLAH+;_"Just Another ";_
    1. Re:Am I the only one wondering... by ThinkWeak · · Score: 1

      Which would be more open to conspiracy theories.......

      Russian Rocket debris crashing down into Wyoming

      or

      U.S. Missile Defense system shoots down unidentified incoming missile?

      I, personally, am glad it's been listed as a russian rocket falling out of space and that it has impacted in Wyoming. At least now Mr. Bush SHOULD NOT be able to declare war on the Kremlin.

    2. Re:Am I the only one wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US Space command would have been tracking this thing from the moment it went into space (something they do expressly so they won't respond to events like this.

  63. Red Dawn by maple_shaft · · Score: 0

    Sort of reminds me of that cheesy 80's movie churned out by our government propogandists to boost patriotism during the end of the cold war.

    Ya know the one...

    Where Russians invaded the United States and brilliantly decided to start in Idaho or Colorado or some other north western insignificant state. @_@

  64. Did you have to post that? by wiredog · · Score: 1

    I've been trying to forget that movie for decades. Sigh. The stupid things we whilst stoned...

  65. Let's see if anybody gets this one by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 2, Funny

    I thought Pavel Bure retired many years ago. And Wyoming doesn't even have an NHL team!

    1. Re:Let's see if anybody gets this one by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Man, I wish I had mod points right now.

      Apparently no other Canadians do either.

      Off topic, but I saw a guy in a Bure jersey last night, as the Panthers were in town.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  66. ...citing precedent by Xodmoe · · Score: 1

    When American territory was attacked in 1941 by the Japanese, the first country they invaded was Italy.

    ...or possibly somewhere in North Africa. It was before my time.

    ...funny thing. I think the US still has troops in both countries.

    1. Re:...citing precedent by Anonymous+McCartneyf · · Score: 1

      We invaded both places. I think North Africa came first: the Italians and Germans controlled much of it at the time.
      "Somewhere in North Africa" is not a country. As far as I know, we don't have soldiers in any of the countries that we fought in over there. It's not like there are European colonies in that area anymore.
      We've plenty of soldiers in Italy, though.

      --
      There is a fine line between recklessness and courage... -- Paul McCartney
  67. I never thought... by Zaatxe · · Score: 1

    ...that the way I would come to know that a place could be called Wyoming as by it being hit by a russian rocket! Imagine the odds!!!

    --
    So say we all
  68. Just a Little Ironic... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    ...that we've had all those missiles in Wyoming pointed at the USSR/Russia for decades, and they actually got the first strike. It used to be common practice for both sides to occasionally test the others reactions in various ways. So, having not RTFA, and putting on my tin foil hat, I wonder if this was truely debris, or could it have been been an "accident" to test our defenses?

    Related link: http://www.strategic-air-command.com/missiles/Peac ekeeper/Peacekeeper_Missile_Home_Page.htm

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  69. "Turn your key, sir!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  70. Cheney's home by peter303 · · Score: 1

    He a summer home near Jackson Hole and possibly another house in the state too.

  71. only in by jaimz22 · · Score: 0

    in soviet america, wyoming hits rocket!

  72. George W. Bush on Falling Debris by davro · · Score: 0

    G W BUSH I do declare, This is a calculated attack from the Russians.
    It may seem a simple accident, but i G W BUSH have it on good intelligence that i am not that simple (Laughter.)
    They want to go back to the Cold war days, forget it we shall give them a Luke Warm War with heated blankets (Laughter.)
    The only people who are going to reform Russia are the Americans, and now is the time to strike (Applause.)

    G W BUSH: Thank you all. Very good night we shall address this matter in the morning. (Applause.)


  73. Mod Parent Up by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

    I also used to think the war in Iraq wasn't at all about oil until I learned a few things. First, Iraq has one of the (if not the) largest oil reserves remaining in the Middle Eastern region. And what happens there will continue have a big impact on the world oil markets for decades to come, while reserves begin to dry up in other countries. This and the fact that the US 'planners' (in discussions that took place well before 9/11) knew well in advance that any war in Iraq would take decades to resolve, makes one think that the Administration's motive was something more than the simple "Saddam is evil - has WMD's" arguments.

    Second, prior to the invasion, Iraq was set to convert their oil exchange from dollars to Euros which would have had a pretty severe impact on the value of the dollar and hence the US economy. Those things alone are enough to make you think that the whole WMD argument was just a smoke screen to complete an agenda that was probably in place well before 9/11 even happened.

    --
    What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
  74. Petrodollar by JavaLord · · Score: 1

    Second, prior to the invasion, Iraq was set to convert their oil exchange from dollars to Euros which would have had a pretty severe impact on the value of the dollar and hence the US economy.

    If this was a large factor, expect an attack on Iran soon. Iran is changing over to the euro.

    1. Re:Petrodollar by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 1

      Well if this rumor turns out to be true, things could get real intersting over there soon. And just when oil prices had started coming down again.

      A correction to my previous post: I did some checking and learned that Saudi Arabia has the largest known oil reserves in the region. Iran and Iraq are close seconds around a billion barrels each which combined is still less than what is known to exist under the Saudi sands. That will teach me to quote stuff I hear on the radio without checking first.

      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    2. Re:Petrodollar by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      If this was a large factor, expect an attack on Iran soon. Iran is changing over to the euro.

      It was much more practical to invade Iraq than Iran. Even Bush & Co. realize that invading Iran would be a nightmare, which is why all the back-and-forth sabre ratling has so far amounted to nothing even though Iran presents a real threat of WMDs and terrorism. They may be happy -- or have to be happy -- with having claimed Iraq. On the other hand, Bush has clearly stated that he has left all options open.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  75. OK, ok... by Wapiti-eater · · Score: 2

    You've seen the smoldering piece of space junk.
    You've taken photos of the dimple in the prairie where it landed.
    You drank all our beer.
    You've chased our women and you've run over our Antelope.
    We tolerated your complaints about there not being enough Starbucks around to satisfy your habits.

    Now, just pay your damn bar tabs and go home already. Winter is setting in, we got work to do and we don't want to have to spend time saving your happy asses when the weather gets bad.

    Thank you and have a nice day.
      - Wapiti-eater
            Wyoming Immigration Officer
            Central District

    --
    Senior NCO in the fight against entropy. I've seen things, man. Things no one should have to see.....
  76. Personal Experience by bbockholt · · Score: 0

    Once, long ago, I witnessed the re-entry of a large booster section. It was nightime, and it looked like an enormous sparkler drifting silently across the sky in slow motion. The main body was slowly tumbling, getting larger and smaller, and leaving a trail of golden sparks as long as my spread-out hand. Smaller bits would split off, each with their own trail, and they would split again, and again. After maybe thirty seconds it disappeared over the horizon toward the ocean.

    Glad it didn't land in my backyard, although the souvenir sales might have compensated a bit.

    --
    Rocket Scientist + Brain Surgeon = Rocket Surgeon! (Let's get this O.R. in orbit!)
  77. Fireworks by WiseMuse · · Score: 0

    Cool! Fireworks! ... Sort of

  78. An even funnier film by spun · · Score: 1

    Even more hilarious is another FCDA film linked to from that article. Called The House in the Middle and distributed by the Federal Civil Defense Administration, the same folks who brought you Duck and Cover, it attempts to show that a clean, freshly painted house is more likely to survive a nuclear attack.

    The film was actually produced by the National Paint, Varnish and Lacquer Association.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  79. Iraq's oil needs less refining. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That means higher profit margins, as it's sold at the same price at the pumps as oil which requires more refining. That's one of the reasons why it was so important to grab Iraq's oil.