Slashdot Mirror


Something in Your Food is Moving

Dekortage writes "The New York Times has a report on probiotic food: food that has live bacteria in it. From the article: "[for Dannon's] Activia, a line of yogurt with special live bacteria that are marketed as aiding regularity, sales in United States stores have soared well past the $100 million mark.... Probiotics in food are part of a larger trend toward 'functional foods,' which stress their ability to deliver benefits that have traditionally been the realm of medicine or dietary supplements.""

378 comments

  1. Patent infringement? by Average_Joe_Sixpack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Activia, a line of yogurt with special live bacteria that are marketed as aiding regularity

    Taco Bell should sue them for patent infringement.

    1. Re:Patent infringement? by bwd234 · · Score: 0

      I wish I had mod points for that one! LOL

    2. Re:Patent infringement? by EmagGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      They said "aiding regularity," not "forcibly exploding your colon out through your asshole."

    3. Re:Patent infringement? by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's the difference? Everything ends up in the toliet bowl of life...

    4. Re:Patent infringement? by JanneM · · Score: 5, Funny

      They said "aiding regularity," not "forcibly exploding your colon out through your asshole."

      Well, if it bursts out on the hour, every hour...

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    5. Re:Patent infringement? by springbox · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it's more like - If Dannon tries to file a patent, Taco Bell already has prior art.

    6. Re:Patent infringement? by hotani · · Score: 1

      Farnsworth: "This will be one hell of a bowel movement. He'll be lucky to have any bones left!"

    7. Re:Patent infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Perhaps if people stopped eating animal products they wouldn't be constipated...
      The human body is not designed to consume animal products. Humans can't chase and kill 99.9% of wild animals. Humans would never naturally suck milk from a cow's breast, or from any other animal's. Humans might naturally eat the occasional egg, but that's about it.
      But hey - you were brought up to believe that killing animals is 'normal', so let's not question it!

    8. Re:Patent infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Bullshit. We are designed to eat whatever food we can get. We didn't make it thousands of years by eating soybeans. If you've ever taken an anthropology class, it's pretty clear that meat has been part of our diet from day one. Community, migration patterns, and technology were all driven, in large part, by our quest for meat... precisely because we can't chase down and eat animals barehanded. Our nature was to develop tools to help feed us. The vegan propaganda machine would like to remind you that all nature is beautiful, except our own. Killing and eating animals is one of the most "normal" things we do. The milk argument might have some merit, but again, we are designed to be omnivores, to survive. You can argue against industrial farming, slaughterhouse conditions, bioengineering, etc... but the notion that we aren't meant to eat meat is so far from true that it borders on the hilarious.

    9. Re:Patent infringement? by ePhil_One · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Humans can't chase and kill 99.9% of wild animals

      Just because you can't doesn't mean your ancestors couldn't. Humans chase down prey largely by endurance, sure, a cheetah can run 60Mph for a few hundred yards, but he won't recover enough to repeat that dash when the 10 "cave men" catch up. Humans are pack hunters like many others, and humans, like many other hunters, use cammaflauge and stealth to get close enough to the prey to kill. And besides, .1% of anaimals is a pretty wide variety of animals compared to the 10 or so varieties we depend on today as food sources. The survivors of the Ice Age that killed off almost all Homo Sapiens all those Millenia ago were known to be huge meat eaters, dining on the wicked fast shellfish that gathered on the shores of ancient Africa (HUGE piles of proto-oyster shells are ample evidence of the evolutionary presence of meat in our diets). Insects were likely another mainstay (termite mounds keep several African villages alive as I recall). Small rodents and infants of other species could be easily captured by humans working in groups. You think we just happened uppon domesticated sheep one day?

      Any thoughts you have that proto man had a concious and would choose death over killing are comical. Our ancestors were brutal survivors living on the edge, domestication of animals is one of the things that gave us the spare calories to invent things like morals.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    10. Re:Patent infringement? by EatHam · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Most evolutionary biologists believe that eating meat was what provided the necessary ingredients for humans to be able to develop our brains, language centers, and the other things that make us who we are. This explains why most vegetarians are so fucking stupid.

    11. Re:Patent infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    12. Re:Patent infringement? by EatHam · · Score: 1

      You've got 'er backwards there chuck.

    13. Re:Patent infringement? by RKBA · · Score: 1

      I would have said "... borders on insanity", but in any case I wish I had some mod points to give you, my fellow omnivore.

    14. Re:Patent infringement? by MSZ · · Score: 1

      This is why everyone should join the Meatarian Movement! Meat good, grass and leaves bad!

      And we want our food the way it should be - dead. Possibly also grilled, fried, roasted or stewed.

      Join us! We can rule the galaxy together!
      (And have a medium done steak with crispy bacon on the side)

      --
      The moon is not fully subjugated. I demand a second assault wave preceded by a massive nuclear bombardment.
    15. Re:Patent infringement? by zobier · · Score: 2, Funny
      The survivors of the Ice Age that killed off almost all Homo Sapiens all those Millenia ago were known to be huge meat eaters, dining on the wicked fast shellfish that gathered on the shores of ancient Africa (HUGE piles of proto-oyster shells are ample evidence of the evolutionary presence of meat in our diets).
      Just to clarify; are you suggesting we were killing ourselves off or some other Homo sp.?
      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    16. Re:Patent infringement? by draxbear · · Score: 1

      If we're not supposed to eat animals, why are they made out of meat? :)

      --
      --- I've completed diagnosis of your problem and can classify it as a YOYO...You're On Your Own
    17. Re:Patent infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe he's saying that a different evolutionary branch of humanity that wasn't Homo Sapiens was killing us. Think Neanderthal.

    18. Re:Patent infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we are not supposed to eat people, why are they made out of meat? :)

    19. Re:Patent infringement? by Dabido · · Score: 1

      Don't take this the wrong way, I don't care if you eat meat or not, BUT you've wandered off track a little.

      Just becasue You're not a vegetarian doesn't give you open slather to start insulting us.
      As a vegetarian who also has an IQ in the top 1% I'd like to tell you how wrong you are. Most vegetarians I know are actually highly intelligent. [And that includes their off spring too, who are normally also vegetarians].

      But, let's checka list of some of histories vegetarians
      Leonardo Da Vinci was a vegetarian. [Stupid was he?] He's probably the most brilliant human that ever lived.
      Clint Eastwood; Paul McCartney; Henry David Thoreau; Mohandas Ghandi; All the Dhali Lamas; Albert Schweitzer; Thomas Edison; Albert Einstein; Nikola Tesla; Franz Kafka; Leo Tolstoy; Voltaire; Yehudi Menuhin; All vegetarian [and there are even more if you want to add to the list I'll let you google it]. IN fact, you'd probably be amazed at how many Professors and highly regarded Doctors are on the list.

      So, don't go around saying most vegetarians are fucking stupid, as you're only insulting some of the greatest minds that ever lived [as well as some of the greatest minds they STILL exist].

      So pack your prejudices away and just accept the fact that brilliant people can eat things other than what you eat. [And I'll just repeat so you don't go down the wrong road. I don't care what you eat.]

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    20. Re:Patent infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star Trek XII: The Quest for Meat. Kirk and Spock roam the galaxy searching for the perfect hamburger, rumored to be served by green carhops wearing Spandex. On the way, they run into an alien race called the Activians, who communicate by flinging poo. Bones points out that they resemble ancient Congressmen running for election. End titles: No redshirts died in the making of this movie.

    21. Re:Patent infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to clarify; are you suggesting we were killing ourselves off or some other Homo sp.?

      Not the clearest way to say it, but after reading it a couple of times, it becomes clear that the way it was meant to be read was: "the Ice Age that killed off almost all Homo Sapiens".

    22. Re:Patent infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an omnivore with an IQ in the top .0007348917%, allow me to point out that you are a pretentious douche. Among other famous vegetarians, you can also include such luminaries as Corey Feldman, Steven Seagal, and Rikki Rockett from Poison. Meat eaters are not running around doing studies to prove that they are smarter than vegetarians. Humans are designed to eat meat, and by "designed" I'm not talking about Intelligent Design. Taking a look at our teeth is all the proof you need. If your conscience doesn't allow you to eat meat, or some diet guru has convinced you to switch to soy, or whatever your motivation... that does not mean you are smarter. Get over yourself.

    23. Re:Patent infringement? by AP31R0N · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i know i'm coming to this thread late, but your post reminded me of a theory i recently made. Morality is a luxury and a by-product of technology. Civilization and its evolution is a sort of social technology. (YHIHF!) We can afford to think about women's rights because we aren't running away from lions and wolves. We can argue about the morality of eating animals for pleasure because we aren't spending all of our daylight hours working the fields or chasing down a gazelle. We can learn about Nietzsche because our fellow humans aren't trying to take our land and females. Similarly, the rich can buy paintings, while the poorest of us might resort to crime to buy food. How can one care about history or math when one is hungry or under constant threat of death? Therefore: World peace or utopia will be the result of technologies that bring everyone out of hunger, fear and envy. It won't be diplomats or peace activists who bring us peace. It will be scientists and companies making things to bring luxuries down to the masses.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    24. Re:Patent infringement? by Dabido · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, I'm NOT the one being the pretentious douche.

      At no time did I try or even claim that vegetarians were smarter. I was the one replying to the person who claimed vegetarians were 'fucking stupid'. All I did was point out that the parent was mistaken for making such a stupid claim. Like I mentioned TWICE in my comment, I don't care if people eat meat or not. That wasn't the point I was making or even trying to make.

      So don't get on your high horse and try to put words into my mouth. At no time have I tried to convert peope to vegetariansm nor have I tried to claim that being a vegetarian makes you smarter. READ WHAT I DID SAY. Just because someone is a vegetarian DOESN'T MEAN THEY'RE 'FUCKING STUPID' as the parent claimed. That's the ONLY point I was making, and the list of famous vegetarians who were also brilliant was to prove my point, which I beleive I have.

      Some people on slashdot seem to think that by name calling they can win an arguement. First the parent by calling vegetarians 'Fucking Stupid' and now you by deliberately trying to twist what I was saying to try to make it seem like I was claiming it makes you smarter. Learn to read. It might make your life a lot easier to actually understand what is being said.

      As for your arguements about conscious and diet gurus, neither of these are the reason I don't eat meat. I'm allergic to the stuff. I'm also allergic to soy.

      As for it making me smarter, like I pointed out already those are your words not mine. I never made that claim. So you can learn to read and can go get over yourself.

      And just to repeat AGAIN, I don't care if people eat meat or not! [But will you pick it up this time? Probably not.]

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
    25. Re:Patent infringement? by Bertie · · Score: 1

      See those pointy teeth in your mouth? Do you think they're there for chewing vegetables?

    26. Re:Patent infringement? by zobier · · Score: 1

      D'oh! You're right. I didn't read it that way, I think my caffeine gauge was on E.

      BTW: Why was it modded funny!?

      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    27. Re:Patent infringement? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      The human body is not designed to consume animal products.

      Correct. However, it has most certainly _evolved_ to consume "animal products" (else it would be physically incapable of deriving nutritional value from them like, say, herbivorous animals).

      Humans can't chase and kill 99.9% of wild animals.

      Sure they can. Or are you trying to suggest people didn't hunt animals before they days of guns ?

      Humans would never naturally suck milk from a cow's breast, or from any other animal's. Humans might naturally eat the occasional egg, but that's about it.

      Anyone who thinks humans aren't omnivores is either stupid, or ignorant.

      But hey - you were brought up to believe that killing animals is 'normal', so let's not question it!

      It is *far* more "normal" than a vegan diet, which - especially in the absence of modern food processing techniques - is quite difficult to live healthily on.

  2. Where's the Gagh? by Chicken04GTO · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wheres the Gagh? [/wendys wheres the beef lady]

    1. Re:Where's the Gagh? by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      In the words of the Klingon that offered Cpt Kirk the moving delicacy: "Gagh is better alive"

  3. Activia by ShaunC · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been eating Activia for breakfast every morning for probably 6 months, and haven't really noticed that it's doing any good in the gastro department. Maybe if I quit having vodka for dinner...

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    1. Re:Activia by SNR+monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, I think it's the vodka + Activia for breakfast that is keeping me from seeing any real benefits.

    2. Re:Activia by araemo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Perhaps someone here can tell me, what is the real difference between this fancy 'Activia' brand, and normal live culture yogurt (such as the Yoplait custard style I've been eating for 20 years when I want yogurt)?

      Good yogurt has always had live bacteria in it, and the health effects of eating that live bacteria are not news.

    3. Re:Activia by linzeal · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They patented it and called it a healthy sounding name.

    4. Re:Activia by value_added · · Score: 5, Informative

      Perhaps someone here can tell me, what is the real difference between this fancy 'Activia' brand, and normal live culture yogurt (such as the Yoplait custard style I've been eating for 20 years when I want yogurt)?

      Check the ingredients, lately?

      Yoplait, etc. are marketed as yoghurts in the same way colourful beverages are sold as juice: there might be some juice in there somewhere, and it may look like juice, but all in all, it's mostly something else.

      Don't recall off-hand, but Yoplait, etc. are predominantly milk and milk solids with a healthy (pun intended) dose of various gums and emulsifiers added to give it the texture of real yoghurt.

      To take this a step further, what's the difference between real cheese, and the waxy pasteurised stuff sold as cheese in the typical supermarket? Easy -- one is cheese; the other is something else. Anyone that has even once tasted either will agree this.

      Real yoghurt (and real cheese) are available in the U.S., but typically only at high-priced cheese shops, specialty stores, or similar venues that escape notice from regulators. IIRC, it's illegal (as much so as Cuban cigars), but the market for the stuff is alive and well (again, pun intended), and the customers are loyal and happy to pay. Not too many people make real yoghurt locally, but it's not uncommon to find raw cheeses available at better farmers markets.

    5. Re:Activia by araemo · · Score: 1

      The general consensus elsewhere in the thread seems to be along the lines of: "Other yogurts might not have much that is still alive, this stuff is metered so you KNOW you get the real stuff."

      and yet, how do you make homemade yogurt? Buy some store bought, stick it in a container with some freshly-pasteurized milk, and let it sit at a given temperature for x hours. Makes me think there is enough in there. ;) Especially since I end up eating some every morning before work, just because I like the taste, and it's higher-protein(Keeps me going longer) than the muffins and other fast food I have available.

      (On the other hand, the store brand junk that doesn't have any mention of 'live cultures' and has to call it something like 'yogurt food product', I'd be willing to bet is not as healthy. ;) )

    6. Re:Activia by g1zmo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I tried the Activa last year and had to quit eating it before I even got through the first 8-pack. It made me itch, particularly on the back of my neck and ears. I liked the flavor and texture (very creamy), but I guess I was just allergic to something in it.

      --
      I have found there are just two ways to go.
      It all comes down to livin' fast or dyin' slow.
      -REK, Jr.
    7. Re:Activia by Otto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps someone here can tell me, what is the real difference between this fancy 'Activia' brand, and normal live culture yogurt (such as the Yoplait custard style I've been eating for 20 years when I want yogurt)?
       
      Good yogurt has always had live bacteria in it, and the health effects of eating that live bacteria are not news. The real difference is that Activia invented some fake-latin sounding names for their bacteria, trademarked 'em, and then used it in their marketing campaign.

      Consumer Reports mentioned them a few issues ago, and said that a test of Activia's bacteria showed that only 0.1% of them survived the passage through the stomach. So the idea that they somehow aid digestion is rather silly.
      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    8. Re:Activia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know about Yoplait. But Dannon (standard Dannon yogurt, not just the Activa stuff) still announces "contains active yogurt cultures including L. acidophilus." I don't know where you get the idea that it's illegal. Ingrediant-wise. There's some geletin and your standard acids and phosphates but the top ingrediant is still "Cultured grade A low fat milk"

    9. Re:Activia by 42nnn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Activa has Active in the name so fat ladys dont feel bad when they eat 30 of them

    10. Re:Activia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      passage through the stomach isn't much of a test. you wouldnt really expect most things to survive passage through, nor would you necessarily want to (who knows what a large amount of live culture in your colon would do?). the proper question is how long do they survive in the stomach before dying and what do they actually do there, not how many get pooped out alive.

    11. Re:Activia by SpiritGod21 · · Score: 1

      Real yoghurt (and real cheese) are available in the U.S., but typically only at high-priced cheese shops, specialty stores, or similar venues that escape notice from regulators. IIRC, it's illegal (as much so as Cuban cigars), but the market for the stuff is alive and well (again, pun intended)

      I think I'm just not understanding something, so I was wondering if you could comment back and clarify for me... I know you can't be saying that real yoghurt and cheese is illegal, right? Please tell me dairy products haven't been put on the terrorist list...

      If they are, wow. Learn something new every day.

    12. Re:Activia by Rei · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think that's common knowledge. There's an old joke that goes something like:

      "Q: What's the difference between (city-you-hate) and yoghurt?

      A: Yoghurt has an active, living culture."

      --
      Yes, I've read a poem. Try not to faint.
    13. Re:Activia by panaceaa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Less than 0.1% of sperm survive the passage through the vagina and fertilize an egg. Is the idea that they somehow aid reproduction rather silly?

    14. Re:Activia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Real yoghurt (and real cheese) are available in the U.S., but typically only at high-priced cheese shops, specialty stores, or similar venues that escape notice from regulators.

      Bullshit. Several brands sell real yogurt. Stonyfield Farms is sold widely in almost every supermarket in Massachusetts, probably elsewhere. Just because it's not available where YOU are doesn't mean it's not available.

      IIRC, it's illegal (as much so as Cuban cigars), but the market for the stuff is alive and well (again, pun intended), and the customers are loyal and happy to pay.

      Uh- the only thing that is "illegal" is unpasteurized products, and with mostly good reason. The US isn't alone- the UK and many other countries ban unpasteurized products.

    15. Re:Activia by eaolson · · Score: 0
      Don't recall off-hand, but Yoplait, etc. are predominantly milk and milk solids...

      Out of curiosity, what do you actually think yogurt is made out of?

    16. Re:Activia by Moraelin · · Score: 1
      passage through the stomach isn't much of a test. you wouldnt really expect most things to survive passage through, nor would you necessarily want to (who knows what a large amount of live culture in your colon would do?). the proper question is how long do they survive in the stomach before dying and what do they actually do there, not how many get pooped out alive.


      Heh. Actually surviving through the stomach is the _whole_ idea, since these bacteria are supposed to help in your intestines, not in your stomach. Noone found a bacteria that's useful in the stomach yet, unless maybe if you're a cow.
      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    17. Re:Activia by joelgrimes · · Score: 1

      Cheese and yoghurt are legal, but only if they are made from pasteurized milk - which supposedly makes the end-product different from the European variety (dunno, never tried theirs).

      I think the parent was overstating his point. If you go to a regular supermarket and buy yoghurt that says "Contains live and active cultures", you'll be getting the real thing - just made from pasteurized milk.

    18. Re:Activia by karzan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The UK bans unpasteurised products? That's funny--the unpasteurised cheese I regularly buy at Waitrose, Sainsbury's, and the local farmer's market must all be illegal!

      FYI, pasteurisation is not required here in the UK, nor is it required almost anywhere else except the US. There is no good reason for it at all, particularly in the case of cheese, where any cheese older than a couple of months is harmless for anyone with a normal immune system who is not pregnant. People can take care of themselves, if food is properly labelled and people are educated; in the same way I do not eat dish detergent, a pregnant woman would not eat unpasteurised cheese. If you doubt the viability of this, consider the fact that most countries in the world do not require pasteurisation, and yet (miraculously!) do not have particularly high rates of related illnesses, miscarriages left and right, etc.

    19. Re:Activia by Obyron · · Score: 3, Informative

      The GP is being a food snob, and mostly (s)he's right. It has to do with how the FDA requires milk to be pasteurized. Rather than being pasteurized for a longer amount of time at slightly lower temperatures (allowing more "good" bacteria to survive), the FDA requires that milk be pretty much nuked at "critical mass" temperatures for a shorter amount of time, because it's cheaper and generally results in a bacterial holocaust.

      Milk in other countries isn't pasteurized to the FDA "Chernobyl" Standard, and because of that the cheeses and other products made from it can't be sold in the United States. Whether or not this somehow means that all cheese sold in the US is inferior is up for argument. I'm of the opinion that it's not all bad.

      --
      --Obyron
    20. Re:Activia by jmrives · · Score: 2, Informative

      In addition to that excellent explanation, I would like to add that making yogurt at home is very simple. Here is a site that gives the details: http://biology.clc.uc.edu/fankhauser/Cheese/yogurt _making/YOGURT2000.htm. Here is another informative article: http://homecooking.about.com/library/archive/bldai ry9.htm

    21. Re:Activia by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Stonyfield is also available here in NJ. And for what it's worth, it tastes @#^&ing AMAZING. God. It's like an orgy in my mouth...

      (Because it is!)

    22. Re:Activia by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh, it definitely makes a difference. For me, not a good one either. I've had IBS for a while now (something a 26 yr old really shouldn't have.) I eat Columbo yogurts, mostly 'cause I like 'em and they're good protein/calcium and easy on my stomach.

      I tried Activia for a week instead of the Columbo, and all I could think of were the commercials for "foaming pipe snake" drain cleaner/clog remover. Because there was some definite foaming and snake like action coming from my rear end for 3 days afterwords.

      I'm not going to eat it again, unless the Fleet enema is the only other alternative.

      --
      "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
    23. Re:Activia by fxm87 · · Score: 1

      It's the Retsyn(TM) of yoghurts.

    24. Re:Activia by Katharine · · Score: 1

      Actually, raw milk cheese is perfectly legal in the U.S. so long as it is a variety that has been aged at least 60 days.

    25. Re:Activia by CoffeeJedi · · Score: 1

      The larger organic chain stores here in the US (Whole Foods, Earth Fare) sell raw cheese.

      --
      May you be touched by His Noodly Appendage. RAmen.
    26. Re:Activia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to think about log factor reductions of very large numbers: i.e. 0.1% survival is the same as 99.9 percent destruction is the same as a 3 log kill. reduce one billion by three log and you have one million. This is much less than a billion, but objectively still a large number. These bacteria go on to attach to the walls of your intestine. Since there is only so much room for bacteria to grow there the more places taken up by commensal or benificial bacteria, the less spaces there are for pathogenic bacteria to find a toe hold. FYI - the active cultures in stoneybrook (stoneyfield?) farms are proven to be benificial, I don't know if the same studies have been run on Activa bacteria. Also, there is almost nothing easier in the kitchen than making one's own youghurt.

    27. Re:Activia by Suicyco · · Score: 1

      What the hell are you talking about? Cheese and yogurt are illegal? Everything labeled "cheese" in your local market is CHEESE. "Pastuerized process cheese food" is what you probably meant (I hope, you can't be THAT stupid), the prepackaged slices of cheese, which are NOT labeled cheese.

      I buy bree, gouda, cheddar, all kinds of REAL cheese every flipping week you dumbass. From my local grocery store, in southern california. They also have a huge selection of LIVE culture yogurts. Why dont YOU try reading your food labels sometimes. Jesus. The shit people will believe about food is amazing. People want to eat all kinds of "good" foods containing live cultures, but they are terrified of genetically modified vegetables, or irradiated foods, etc. You know last time I checked, most deadly food poisoning happens with "live cultures". Not that I have anything against eating various strains of microorganisms, I love yogurts and cheeses, beer, etc. Just commenting on the stupidity of idiots like this who believe all kinds of fallacies their local "health food" morons promote to get you to buy their expensive crap.

      Go get an enema and quit spreading misinformation around. I'll go enjoy some premium aged gouda, bought at a big chain supermarket. Then maybe enjoy a live yogurt culture from the same market.

      BTW, you do know that yogurt is primarily milk solids, as it cheese. Do you have any idea what it is you eat or what?

    28. Re:Activia by Suicyco · · Score: 1

      Its totally irrelevant unless the end product is also heat pastuerized. The colonies added to yogurt are not naturally present in milk, neither is the renet added to cheese.

      Now there is some merit to the argument regarding imported beer, because it is pastuerized which kills any live yeast in bottle conditioned beer. Some argue this kills some nutritional and taste benefits.

      With regards to european cheeses and yogurts, its largely irrelevant. Its just food snob hype. All the cheese sold in markets in the US that is labeled cheese is CHEESE. Period. Killing microorganisms in the milk prior to the cheese making process has no effect on the cheese flavor itself, as that is a factor of the fats and solids on the milk plus to microorganisms added to create the cheese.

      We are simply talking recipe's here. Not food product definitions. Nor the illegality of "real" cheese. Just marketing hype.

    29. Re:Activia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my dad is really into the health food thing and made me switch to soy milk for a week to make me see if I felt different. I didn't notice any difference he did, I am about to read an article in this months wired on the placebo effect should be interesting. But the soy milk he got me said on it "with live bacteria culture to promote immune system." Any fans of Nietzsche?

    30. Re:Activia by zobier · · Score: 1
      Perhaps someone here can tell me, what is the real difference between this fancy 'Activia' brand, and normal live culture yogurt (such as the Yoplait custard style I've been eating for 20 years when I want yogurt)?
      Well with Yakult, which is the brand we get here, the Lactobacillus casei Shirota strain they use is supposed to reach the intestines unharmed. Could all just be a marketing ploy but I find it makes a big difference.
      --
      Me lost me cookie at the disco.
    31. Re:Activia by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2, Funny

      God. It's like an orgy in my mouth... (Because it is!)

      Ahhh yes, the bukkake of yogurts...

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    32. Re:Activia by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Don't recall off-hand, but Yoplait, etc. are predominantly milk and milk solids

      What do you think "real" yogurt is made out of?

      with a healthy (pun intended) dose of various gums and emulsifiers added to give it the texture of real yoghurt.

      "Real" yogurt -- as you describe it, sans additives -- has a low consistancy and tends to seperate quickly, hence the process of homoginzation and the addition of gums. These things were specifically added to combat the problem of consistency and texture, not to "emulate natural yogurt."

      There are no emulsifiers that I know of in yogurt, since the ingredients blend readily. "Emulsifier" is a scary word, but it's just something that allows two otherwise immiscible substances (like oil and water) to be more easily blended. They're typically natural substances, such as mustard, egg yolk, and other protiens. In other words, nothing to get one's panties in a bunch over.

      what's the difference between real cheese, and the waxy pasteurised stuff sold as cheese in the typical supermarket? Easy -- one is cheese; the other is something else.

      Processed American cheese must contain at least 90 percent real cheese. Products labeled "cheese food" must be 51 percent cheese, and most are 65 percent.

      Anyone that has even once tasted either will agree this.

      Fortunate then, that opinions are not evidence.

      To answer the GP's question, the difference between Yoplait and Activa is mostly the name and some of the flavorings. They both have live bacterial cultures, else they wouldn't ferment to begin with.

    33. Re:Activia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi. Let a 28 years old french guy share some of his knowledge.

      To answer the question about the difference between Activia and other yoghurts, as someone wrote in another post, it "contains active yogurt cultures including L. acidophilus.". I'm not amazed that no one amongst the posters knew that, because now it's almost totally occulted. But things used to be different.

      When I was a kid, when they started to sell these yogurts containing "active bifidus"*, the ad clearly explained that "active bifidus helps keeping your intestinal flora (not sure of the translation) in a healthy state, thus facilitating the transit", etc etc. Nowadays, the only effect mentioned in the ad is that it "brings back order inside", with a big yellow arrow moving on a nude woman's belly (I think you have the same kind of bullshit out there). No more mentions of active bifidus, or intestinal flora, in the ad. Even more funny : the ingredients list now shows "bifidobacterium (Bifidus Actif Essensis)" and, below : "To know the complete scientific name, contact us".

      I never posted on /. but this thread made me feel like showing you (although I think most /.ers are already aware of that) how much TV is now made "for dummies", purposely rendering people less and less used to use their brains.**

      Here, I just needed to write it to the face of the world (yeah I know I should get a blog) : I hate this stupid TV we have nowadays, and I hate even more the fact that people just ask for more, although they perfectly know that its goal is to keep their brains in a passive state.

      --
      Raph

      * ("Bifidus Actif" in french - hence the name of the very first yogurt of this type, "B.A.", in the mid-80's - some months later, Danone made a similar yogurt called "Bio", but due to a recent law which allows only products from biological agriculture (not sure of the translation) to mention the word "Bio", Danone recently renamed it to "Activia" - That's it for the story)

      ** I don't know if it has reached your country, but some months ago, a scandal has arised after the big boss of the first french private channel (TF1) said in an interview that "From a business point of view [...] what we sell to Coca-Cola is available-human-brain time" - the key word here being "available", since he explained later that "making the brain available, entertaining it, relaxing it between two messages" was the goal in their mind when they make/buy TV programs (more on this : http://www.acrimed.org/article1688.html but it's in french).

    34. Re:Activia by Raenex · · Score: 1
      People can take care of themselves, if food is properly labelled and people are educated; in the same way I do not eat dish detergent, a pregnant woman would not eat unpasteurised cheese.

      I find food that should not be eaten by pregnant women disturbing. I have never heard of this before, but then again I wasn't aware of pasteurised cheese debate, either.

      Don't you think there's something wrong if food should not be eaten by pregnant women? Well ok, there's alcohol, but that's an intoxicant, not really food. What is the trouble with unpasteurised cheese?

    35. Re:Activia by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Well, y'see, pregnant women have a hyperactive senes of smell, and if you brought unpasteurised cheese into the house, she'd do nothing but complain about the pong, so it's more for your good than hers...

    36. Re:Activia by karzan · · Score: 1

      Pregnant women have depressed immune systems, and the immune system of the foetus is not fully developed. They thus fall into the general category of people with immune systems that are not fully functional.

      If you fall into this general category, it is important to avoid foods including honey, unpasteurised dairy products, pasteurised soft cheeses, raw/undercooked eggs, and any kind of food that has not been prepared in a particularly sanitary way. What all of these foods have in common is simply that they may bear pathogens that are perfectly well dealt with by an ordinary person's immune system, but that a depressed immune system may have trouble with.

      There is absolutely no harm in a person with a normally functioning immune system eating these foods, just as there is no harm in a person eating foods they are not allergic to, just because some people are.

    37. Re:Activia by Otto · · Score: 1

      True, but nobody claims that sperm aid digestion in the intestines, after passing through the stomach.

      Well, okay, I'm sure that somebody does claim that, but that's rather beside the point.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    38. Re:Activia by cocopopsicle · · Score: 1

      Whether or not cheese is made from pasteurized milk doesn't make it inferior. However, whether the milk is pasteurized may affect the flavor. Australian cheeses are made from pasteurized milk and are just as good as French cheeses (judging from the many different international medals and awards). It's probably more a matter of personal taste.

  4. Food which moves by maroberts · · Score: 0

    Just goes to show that Klingons invented everything first! :-)

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  5. what? by jaymzru · · Score: 0

    $100 million dollars? Poor people have had stuff moving in their food for years.

  6. Old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How is this new? I've seen stuff like this advertised on TV for a good ten years -- yoghurt with live lactic ferments, for one. The spots even bragged about you being able to feel them on your tongue at some point.

    http://www.vivailfitness.it/fermenti.htm for a source, I don't want to link to an actual brand.

    1. Re:Old news? by alva_edison · · Score: 1

      The news is that it is starting to be marketed in the United States; the article is a business piece, not a science piece. They even mention that Activia has been marketed in Europe for 20 years.

      --
      He effected a bored affect.
  7. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The street meat hotdog vendors have been selling food that has live bacteria in it for ages!

    1. Re:Old news by KDR_11k · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're not supposed to eat the stuff Dibbler sells.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  8. Mmmmm bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    food that has live bacteria in it

    I love that sensation of the probiotics crawling down my throat!

    1. Re:Mmmmm bugs by AutopsyReport · · Score: 5, Funny

      I love that sensation of the probiotics crawling down my throat!

      If I only I could get my wife to say the same thing.

      --

      For he today that sheds his blood with me shall be my brother.

    2. Re:Mmmmm bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I can get your wife to say it.

    3. Re:Mmmmm bugs by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1

      That must cost a fortune. You can't even afford a slashdot account.

      --
      Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
    4. Re:Mmmmm bugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was just too easy.

      Just like his wife!

  9. Yogurt! by ReidMaynard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now with FHG-4532 !
    (what's that? My License plate)

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  10. Testing by gravesb · · Score: 1

    Is this tested at all by the FDA, or is it like a supplement, and not subject to testing? Are these common bacteria that we already consume, or are they introducing new bacteria into our system?

    --
    http://bgcommonsense.blogspot.com
    1. Re:Testing by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's food, not a drug, so it doesn't require testing anymore than prunes would do if marketed as a cure for constipation (which they're rather good at!) From TFA

      The Food and Drug Administration takes a neutral position, policing food packages to make sure that companies do not try to equate probiotic products with disease-curing drugs (unless they have scientific evidence to back up a claim). One scholarly group that has addressed the topic recently, the American Academy of Microbiology, said in a 2006 report that "at present, the quality of probiotics available to consumers in food products around the world is unreliable."
      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    2. Re:Testing by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      oh gnoes teh germs will get you!!

      seriously though, don't you think our bodies are capable of handling most bacteria, and certainly i doubt any of these companys would sell anything with poorly cultured bacteria in this litigation happy age we live in. all these health foods and suppliments are crap anyway. we don't need them, our bodies are PERFECT at looking after themselfs. what we need is LESS not more of everything.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:Testing by somersault · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, our bodies are PERFECT at getting what they need, which is why if you eat cardboard and gravel, and stand in a poorly ventilated garage with your SUV running, you'll still be able to bench press said SUV while singing your national anthem of choice while your many cultures of natural bacteria are forming a United Organs and vito-ing your brain.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Testing by oohshiny · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, they are common bacteria, known to be not harmful. Also, you eat lots of bacteria in many other foods anyway.

      Keep in mind that there are a huge number of bacteria living in you and on you, most of them completely uncharacterized, and many of them probably essential for your health and well being.

    5. Re:Testing by kfg · · Score: 5, Informative

      Jesus Christ, are we really that disconnected from our food these days?

      Dude, bacteria is what yogurt is. It's milk, spoiled under controled conditions. Conditions that promote the growth of . . .bacteria.

      For the past few decades commercial yogurt has been pastuerized, i.e, put under controlled conditions that kill bacteria. Don't do that and your yogurt remains live. That's all there is to it.

      KFG

    6. Re:Testing by arivanov · · Score: 5, Interesting

      IIRC - the bacteria is not common for the US. In fact it is uncommon for most of EU.

      It is Lactobacillum Bulgaricum and relatives which are originally from the Balkan peninsula (you can guess from the name). Even now in the remote mountain areas of Bulgaria, Macedonia, Northern Greece and South Eastern Serbia if you leave milk outside it has a very fair chance of becoming a proper yogurt naturally. This does not happen every time though and that is the reason why people add some of the old yogurt in the new milk to start the fermentation. The difference between Lactobacillum produced yogurt and other yogurts is that lactobacillum can ferment even buffalo milk to yogurt without starting to produce nasty ketones and the smelly stuff we usually associate with bad milk. In addition to that once the fermentation has taken place the product is surprisingly stable and can survive up to several weeks in the fridge without any extra preservatives. For reasons not completely understood even today outside its native region native Lactobacillum does not last long so any place using it has to refresh its stocks regularly from the Balkans.

      Danone got their hands on Lactobacillum and started producing decent yogurt after buying the biggest Bulgarian dairy food producer Serdika in the 90-es. Before that their yogurt had the taste of condensed rancid piss fortified with non-sour cream (same as the yogurt still made by most other manufacturers nowdays). Now it is more or less edible. It is not anywhere close to the real stuff which you can get in the Bulgarian, Greek or Macedonian mountains (I sometimes feel like killing someone for a jug of buffalo yogurt), but it can actually be eaten.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    7. Re:Testing by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      +5 finallysomeonesaidit

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    8. Re:Testing by OmniChamp · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oddly enough I happened to check the ingredients on the side of a container of Activa yoghurt and in Canada, the particular strain of probiotic bacteria has a DIN (Drug Identification Number) beside it. Due to my strobe light attention span, I didn't check it out on the Drug Product Database, but I figured it should be mentioned here. I'll probably go and follow up on that at lunch. Hey, pretty lights! (*wanders away aimlessly*)

    9. Re:Testing by j33pn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The bacteria they add are normally found in traditional yogurt. These newer yogurts are just reintroducing some of formally common lactose digesting bacteria that are believed to be beneficial to humans. The sugar in milk is lactose and it is found only in the milk of mammals. As a result, the only bacteria that can digest lactose are found in the digestive systems of mammals, specifically breast feeding 'younglings' and milk drinking humans. Yogurt is made when these bacteria are allowed to feed off of the lactose in milk, which results in the creation of lactic acid. Lactic acid gives yogurt it's tart taste and prevents the growth of other BAD bacteria. In old-world yogurt, there are a bunch of different bacteria that can be found in yogurt, many with beneficial qualities for our health. In industrial yogurt production the process is controlled and limited to only two specific bacteria that are only prized for the ability to produce yogurt very quickly. Yogurt is historically a middle eastern food, b/c the preservative power of the lactic acid would help keep the yogurt safe to consume for some time. In northern Europe people developed the ability to digest lactose into adulthood, an ability that most people and other mammals do not have. There was an article on /. a few weeks ago about this same ability having been found to have developed in a tribe in Africa just in the past few thousand years. I highly recomend the book "On Food and Cooking: The Science and Lore of the Kitchen". In fact, on Amazon, they show the section about Milk and human history in the excerpts. It is really pretty fascinating information regarding this subject.

      --
      You people and your slight differences disgust me! - Prof. Farnsworth
    10. Re:Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>The Food and Drug Administration takes a neutral position, policing food packages to make sure that companies do not try to equate probiotic products with disease-curing drugs (unless they have scientific evidence to back up a claim)

      BS. If I remember right, there was a case of Benecol (A spread that is supposed to lower cholesterol) about five years ago. They had oodles of scientific papers behind it, however FDA did delay after delay, just to stall the market entering so that local US companies would have time to develop competing product.

    11. Re:Testing by Huitzlopochtli · · Score: 1

      Actually, you are wrong - pasteurization is a process that was developed to reduce the load of bacteria, not sterilize it. So, in effect, all commercialized yogurt is "live"...it even says 'contains live cultures' on it.

    12. Re:Testing by norpan · · Score: 1

      Actually, when making yoghurt, the milk is first pasteurized, and then new lactobacteria are added. It's not pasteurized again and so yoghurt will contain living lactobacteria.

      There is yoghurt that is pasteurized again, but this is only too prolong its shelf life.

      The first pasteurization is made to kill disease-causing bacteria.

      --
      Opinions expressed above are mine, and not my employees'.
    13. Re:Testing by Zabu · · Score: 0

      (I sometimes feel like killing someone for a jug of buffalo yogurt)
      Commandment 6: Thou shall not kill (even for a jug of buffalo yogurt) - God

      --
      It's all good.
    14. Re:Testing by kfg · · Score: 1

      Actually, when making yoghurt, the milk is first pasteurized, and then new lactobacteria are added. It's not pasteurized again and so yoghurt will contain living lactobacteria.

      Yeeeeeeeah? That's the way I make it.

      There is yoghurt that is pasteurized again, but this is only too prolong its shelf life.

      Yeeeeeeeeah? That would be most of the commercial stuff you'll find on . . . shelves. That's why the article is here, innit?

      KFG

    15. Re:Testing by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      . . .not sterilize it.

      I didn't say anything about sterilizing.

      . . .it even says 'contains live cultures' on it.

      No, "it" doesn't.

      KFG

    16. Re:Testing by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

      Aye. What gets me is they are marketing this like it's something new. Anybody that's been to the Dr. in the last 20 years and got a prescription for anti-biotics, they tell you to go to the store and get some "live culture" yogurt to help replenish the helpful bacteria in the digestive system that the drug kills off. So now they are marketing this Activa crap as new? This is news? Maybe only to people that don't read labels in the supermarket to figure out what they are sticking in their bodies.

      --
      Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
    17. Re:Testing by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      your many cultures of natural bacteria are forming a United Organs and vito-ing your brain.

      So that's how a brainchild is made?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    18. Re:Testing by fbjon · · Score: 1

      A Bulgarian aquaintance of mine said the same thing, lamenting the virtual nonexistence of Real Yoghurt where she is now.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    19. Re:Testing by somersault · · Score: 1

      I think that tends to happen only in brains where the bacteria have implemented government, taxes, and public education. They tend to get there in a few minutes though, due to their accelerated growth cycle.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    20. Re:Testing by Johnny5000 · · Score: 3, Funny

      The sugar in milk is lactose and it is found only in the milk of mammals.

      Mammal milk you say? As opposed to what, bird milk?

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    21. Re:Testing by j33pn · · Score: 1

      Touche'... coconut milk and soy milk do not contain lactose.

      --
      You people and your slight differences disgust me! - Prof. Farnsworth
    22. Re:Testing by Johnny5000 · · Score: 1

      Touche'... coconut milk and soy milk do not contain lactose.

      arrggg.. my smartass reply has backfired.

      you got me there.

      --
      The libertarian solution to the failures of capitalism is to apply more capitalism til the failures are fixed.
    23. Re:Testing by atomico · · Score: 1

      Lizard milk, you ignorant clod!

    24. Re:Testing by gobbo · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind that there are a huge number of bacteria living in you and on you, most of them completely uncharacterized, and many of them probably essential for your health and well being.

      They outnumber "your" cells 10 to one in your own body (a quadrillion), though they're so small the mass isn't much. Your gut flora is particularly essential to your survival, converting carbohydrates etc. for you to use. You are a walking fermentation vat.

    25. Re:Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most commercial stuff does contain live cultures. This is why you can use it as a starter to make your own yogurt. The National Yogurt Association, an industry group, created the "Live and Active Cultures" label over a decade ago to promote this fact. They are backed by both Dannon and Yoplait who together have the majority of the US market and whose products carry the label. This article is really about them selecting new strains to promote various benefits that are specific to those strains.

    26. Re:Testing by kfg · · Score: 1

      Dannon and Yoplait who together have the majority of the US market and whose products carry the label.

      Yes; Dannon and Yoplait are notable for having live and active cultures and are suitable to use as a starter. I've always used Dannon myself, because it is reliable, whereas most commercial stuff is not.

      Bummer that they've joined the gelatin crowd.

      This article is really about them . . .

      Yeah, just like the National Yogurt Association.

      KFG

    27. Re:Testing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That would be coconut and soy juice. It's only called milk because it's white. Similar to how a cucumber is a fruit but everyone calls it a vegitable because it's green and not sugary sweet.

  11. living 'brew' has been available for 2000+ years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    that would be kombucha tea.

  12. Functionality by JudgeSlash · · Score: 1, Funny

    Get back to me when my vindaloo can fetch some beer.

  13. Live bacteria by pubjames · · Score: 4, Informative

    food that has live bacteria in it

    What, like normal yogurt and cheese?

    Although perhaps in the USA everything is sterilized? Seems a bit nuts to kill all the bateria (yogurt is essentially a culture of bateria) and then add them back in again.

    1. Re:Live bacteria by hshana · · Score: 1

      As far as I know bacteria has always had live cultures in it. Go look at the side of the cup. Mine says "set with active cultures of L. acidophilus and B. bifidum". I know the Dannon claims live cultures of acidophilus for sure.

    2. Re:Live bacteria by operagost · · Score: 3, Informative

      All yogurt contains some live cultures, and one of the consumers interviewed in the article even said so. It's just that the author of the article is too brain-damaged to comprehend what they have written, apparently.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Live bacteria by hjames · · Score: 2, Informative

      We used to be able to buy milk with Acidopholis culture at Giant food - but they phased it out over the last year or so and Safeway doesn't sell it. Thats the "live culture" that lives in your stomac and aids in digestion, but gets killed when you take antibiotics like penicillin.

    4. Re:Live bacteria by oohshiny · · Score: 1

      What, like normal yogurt and cheese?

      Yogurt and cheese that aren't specifically meant for that purpose do not consistently contain large numbers of live bacteria; these drinks should.

    5. Re:Live bacteria by pubjames · · Score: 1

      Yogurt and cheese that aren't specifically meant for that purpose do not consistently contain large numbers of live bacteria; these drinks should.

      Rubbish. If they haven't been sterilized yogurt and cheese are full of bacteria. They are bacterial cultures for chrissakes. If it wasn't for the bacteria, there wouldn't be any cheese or yogurt!

    6. Re:Live bacteria by Aqua_boy17 · · Score: 3, Informative
      Seems a bit nuts to kill all the bateria (yogurt is essentially a culture of bateria) and then add them back in again.
      I used to work in a hospital pharmacy and we stocked several products for doing that very thing. Some patients who had severe infections and aggressive antibioitic therapy would have their natually occuring intestinal bacteria wiped out. These products were given to the patients to help restore the bacterial flora and the ability to digest food without discomfort. IIRC, most of the products were essentially just cultured lactobacillus strains but an MD or pharmacist could elaborate.
      --
      What if the Hokey Pokey really is what it's all about?
    7. Re:Live bacteria by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, I'm afraid US food is dead. Go to any US supermarket and all you see is food in plastic bags. Once you leave the produce section, the whole supermarket looks like a morgue full of sealed body bags that contain once living foodstuffs that have been killed/hydrogenated/frozen/sealed/irradiated to extend their shelf life. Man I miss the open air market in Gif sur Yvette.

      --
      Think global, act loco
    8. Re:Live bacteria by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      While all yogurts are made with active cultures, aren't most commercial yogurts that are sold in the U.S. now pasteurized or heat treated to increase shelf life? If so, that process effectively kills off the live culture. If the label says that it's been pasteurized or heat treated it doesn't have any live cultures. Or, put another way, if the label doesn't say that it contains live and active cultures or that it has the live and active culture seal, then it doesn't (or at least any significant amount).

    9. Re:Live bacteria by themadplasterer · · Score: 1

      Sterilizing milk is required by law in many coutries in order to kill brucellosis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brucellosis and other zoonotic diseases http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zoonosis . That is why pasteurization was started. The healthy bateria are added afterwards for obvious reasons.

    10. Re:Live bacteria by Reverend528 · · Score: 1
      What, like normal yogurt and cheese?

      As well as bottle-conditioned beers which contain living yeast and sometimes bacteria.

    11. Re:Live bacteria by fbjon · · Score: 1

      How the hell does healthy food get phased out, in this day and age?

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    12. Re:Live bacteria by RexRhino · · Score: 2, Informative

      Although perhaps in the USA everything is sterilized? Seems a bit nuts to kill all the bateria (yogurt is essentially a culture of bateria) and then add them back in again.

      It is a weird coalition of capitalists and reactionary leftists at work in America.

      The big corporations like Kraft realize that it is much more expensive to sell foods with live cultures and bacteria in it, as they have a shorter shelf life and are more expensive to manifacture. The trouble is, the stuff with live cultures tastes better and is healthier.

      So what the companies like Kraft did is push for legislation that sets "Safety Standards", that require all dairy products to be pasterized, that set strict limits on the live bacteria that is allowed in food, and essentially have made real foods illegal or prohibitively expensive.

      And since the left almost universally love big government and regulations, then jump in to support the regulations. "GOVERNMENT REGULATIONS ARE HERE TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN FROM BEING POISONED BY EVIL BIG CORPORATIONS!!! IF WE DON'T REQUIRE ALL FOOD TO BE PASTURIZED, OUR CHILDREN WILL DIE!!!". They accuse anyone who doesn't support the regulation of being "evil capitalists" Since the left are pretty much incapable of looking at any law or regulation on industry with any degree of skeptism, they play right into the hands of the big corporations who push for self-serving regulations.

      So now, Kraft doesn't have to compete with real traditional foods... all foods are required by law to be as cheap, tastless, and unhealthy as Kraft products, and if anyone complains about not being able to buy unpasturized cheese from France, the leftist do their part for Kraft by accuse the people of being "evil capitalists" and "industry shills" and whatnot.

      It is brilliant, actually. You have to admire the capitalists for turning a group of people whose raison d'être is to destroy capitalism into being political tools of big corporations.

      So, in the United States, you have things like Stevia (a natural and safe plant ingredient that is a low calorie sweetner) being banned as a food additive because the FDA recieved one single annonmous complaint (YES! That is right, they banned the substance because on one single anonymous complaint of a stomach ache!)... while corn syrup (which is causing an epidemic of obesity), and sacharine (which has been shown to cause cancer) are all totally legal! (You can guess which products are manufactured by large American corporations! :) )... and the great thing is if anyone complains about the situation, THEY get accused of being a "shill for the corporations". (Like that big, powerful, uh, Stevia lobby, you know!).

    13. Re:Live bacteria by hab136 · · Score: 1
      Yes, I'm afraid US food is dead. Go to any US supermarket and all you see is food in plastic bags.

      Solution: Don't go to the supermarket. Farmer's markets, fruit stands and the like carry fresher produce. Supermarkets strive for consistency, even if they're consistently sub-par.

      Man I miss the open air market in Gif sur Yvette.

      Here you go:
      Open air markets in US, Canada, Mexico
      Farmer's Markets in the US
    14. Re:Live bacteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that why you can only buy health food in leftist states?. This is strange, I have seen that leftists are more aware of such food problems then the conservatoves. If you dont believe me compare Missouri and California, you will see the difference.

      Please dont pull politics in here. All polititcians work for the highest bidder.

    15. Re:Live bacteria by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      You find health food in richer states. Poor areas won't have much health food available, rich areas will have health food available. Part of the reason is because of the restrictions placed on healthy food (and the government subsidies on unhealthy stuff, like corn syrup).

    16. Re:Live bacteria by bandannarama · · Score: 1

      The reason for all the food being made dead is precisely because of health issues. Most bacteria/mold/fungi/etc. that would otherwise be present are potentially significant public health risks. When you have a gigantic national food distribution system, a few E. Coli on your spinach can kill quite a few people. From the FDA administrator's perspective, it would be hard to defend setting the public health policy to a lower standard of "deadness" than we have today.

      Although I agree there's something to be said for obtaining the freshest possible food, it only works well when you're connected to the original source in some way (e.g. farmers' market). In a supermarket, I want everything dead, dead, dead.

      --
      Bandannarama
    17. Re:Live bacteria by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      It gets phased out because the store management discovers that 25 packs of frozen White Castle burgers are a better seller.

    18. Re:Live bacteria by oohshiny · · Score: 1

      Rubbish. If they haven't been sterilized yogurt and cheese are full of bacteria. They are bacterial cultures for chrissakes. If it wasn't for the bacteria, there wouldn't be any cheese or yogurt!

      Of course, cheeses and yogurts are "full of bacteria" when they are being made. However, depending on how they are processed and stored, the product that reaches you may even be completely sterile, or it may contain only a low count of viable bacteria.

  14. I support probiotic foods by brother_b · · Score: 5, Funny

    In fact, I consume a good quantity of it on a regular basis. This is assuming that bottle-conditioned unfiltered beer counts.

    Man, live yeast really gives you gas of doom, though.

    1. Re:I support probiotic foods by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      Full of B vitamins too!

    2. Re:I support probiotic foods by blackicye · · Score: 1

      "n fact, I consume a good quantity of it on a regular basis. This is assuming that bottle-conditioned unfiltered beer counts.

      Man, live yeast really gives you gas of doom, though."


      If the yeast is still alive, doesn't that mean the alcohol content of said beer is extremely low?

    3. Re:I support probiotic foods by brother_b · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not necessarily. Different strains of brewer's yeast have varying alcohol tolerences; some can survive in a solution that is over 10% alcohol. Champagne yeast is incredibly tolerant and neutral, and is used sometimes to bottle condition high ABV beers.

    4. Re:I support probiotic foods by MrMr · · Score: 1

      It's probably not the yeast, but the dextrins that give you the gas problem (same as with beans). Of course, beer with live yeast tends to be high-gravity high-dextrin as well in practice.

    5. Re:I support probiotic foods by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      live yeast really gives you gas of doom

      And that's what yogurt's supposed to be good at killing off.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    6. Re:I support probiotic foods by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Of course, beer with live yeast tends to be high-gravity high-dextrin as well in practice.

      So it's not the alcohol but the gravitational pull of the beer that makes keeping your balance difficult?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  15. New to the US by Sciros · · Score: 5, Informative

    There have been probiotic yogurts for sale in Europe (or at least in the UK) for quite some time now. I lived there 2005-2006 and ate this stuff daily (yogurt tastes better there on average anyway).

    If you ask me, the US has a long way to go before reaching the standards in terms of taste and healthiness (is that a word?) that grocery food has set in the UK, Belgium, Netherlands, etc.

    --
    I like basketball!!1!
    1. Re:New to the US by Empty+Threats · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Healthiness" is a word, but not the word you want. People are "healthy." Food is "healthful."

    2. Re:New to the US by inviolet · · Score: 1
      If you ask me, the US has a long way to go before reaching the standards in terms of taste and healthiness (is that a word?) that grocery food has set in the UK, Belgium, Netherlands, etc.

      You, obviously, have never compared (say) Weetabix to (say) Oatmeal Raisin Crisp. American cereals are teh pwnz!

      --
      FATMOUSE + YOU = FATMOUSE
    3. Re:New to the US by splutty · · Score: 1
      There have been probiotic yogurts for sale in Europe (or at least in the UK) for quite some time now.

      Completely correct! I'll hazard a guess and say it's several centuries if not more :)
      --
      Coz eternity my friend, is a long *ing time.
    4. Re:New to the US by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      Mmmmm, a nice healthy bowl of sugar for breakfast!

    5. Re:New to the US by Bill+Barth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Active yogurts have been available in the US for decades if not centuries. Activa is just the first product that I've seen to specifically mention its active cultures as a cure for certain ailments in its advertising. It's really just new marketing (and good marketing, IMO).

      --
      Yes...I am a rocket scientist.
    6. Re:New to the US by Mike_ya · · Score: 1

      Ya, very true. Yogurts that have a certain amount of active cultures display the Live & Active Cultures seal from the National Yogurt Association on the package. Most yogurts I have seen in the store carry the seal.

    7. Re:New to the US by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      but not the word you want "Nutrition" is what he was looking for.
    8. Re:New to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      the US has a long way to go before reaching the standards in terms of taste and healthiness (is that a word?)

      Maybe in English, but not in American.

    9. Re:New to the US by nomadic · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you ask me, the US has a long way to go before reaching the standards in terms of taste and healthiness (is that a word?) that grocery food has set in the UK, Belgium, Netherlands, etc.

      Eh, I wasn't especially impressed by UK groceries. Prepared food, especially, is significantly better in upscale US supermarkets than in anything I found in England.

    10. Re:New to the US by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      The yogurt you speak of is Actimel. It's been in Europe since at least 2000. It's US counterpart (also by Dannon/Danone) is called DanActive and came out sometime last year. The bacteria in that yogurt is L. Casei . A lot of supermarket chains don't carry it but the US's largest retailer (Wal-Mart) does.

      I also tried Activia. It did seem to help somewhat, but it just tasted too boring, like regular old yogurt. DanActive/Actimel comes in little shot-sized packets that just make the process seem more manly and fun. Like the yogurt pirates would have drank.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    11. Re:New to the US by Damek · · Score: 1

      Are you eff'n kidding me? I live in NYC and eat Weetabix every day! It's awesomely good. Particularly with some lovely Shredded Spoonfuls layered on top. Nice!

    12. Re:New to the US by estarriol · · Score: 1

      Weird, I came to the US recently and had the reverse reaction. In the US it seemed that basic foodstuffs were plentiful, but of relatively low quality, and even more sugar and starch-centric than the UK. Good quality prepared food was hard to find. Then again, the quality of prepared food in UK supermarkets has improved steadily over the years, and of course there's a vast variety between chains. Which supermarkets did you go to in the UK, and when?

    13. Re:New to the US by mgblst · · Score: 1

      Wow, I would never put up UK food over any other country, including third world. This is a very bad indication of things in the US. I remember seeing in a supermarket ready-to-pour scramble eggs in a carton.

      But come on, the UK, where half the supermarket is taken up by ready meals, where 30% of the population don't eat fresh fruit or vegetables (and not just regularly, ever!)

    14. Re:New to the US by osarusan · · Score: 1
      in terms of taste and healthiness (is that a word?)

      It's a word, but the word you're looking for is healthfulness.

      A person will become healthy by eating healthful food.

      If your food is healthy, then it's still frolicking in the meadows somewhere. (Actually, in the case of probiotic foods, maybe healthiness and healthfulness are both concerns...)

    15. Re:New to the US by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Mostly Sainsbury's and Tesco, about 2 years ago.

      I'm not sure where you moved to in the US, but I know most major urban areas on the east coast have some pretty good supermarkets. Whole Foods, Wild Oats, and Wegman's spring to mind.

    16. Re:New to the US by dpilot · · Score: 1

      >If you ask me, the US has a long way to go before reaching the standards in terms of taste and healthiness (is that a word?)
      >that grocery food has set in the UK, Belgium, Netherlands, etc.

      You seem to have the mistaken idea that "taste and healthiness" are goals of the US food industry.

      Remember, the goals of industry in the US - any industry, are revenue and profit. Niceties such as "taste and healthiness" are merely means for achieving that goal. They may even even be simply costs to be reduced as much as possible, at least almost to the point where you'd buy a competitor's product, instead.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    17. Re:New to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesco and Sainsbury's food has gotten a bit better, but M&S is consistently really good. More expensive, but food you want to eat.

      Canadian->UK transplant

    18. Re:New to the US by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      But Tesco don't sell food, I think that's where you were going wrong.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    19. Re:New to the US by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1

      In the UK this is what is meant by the term Weetabix (OK technically it's a company that makes all sorts, but that is their namesake)

    20. Re:New to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word.

      M&S Quiche Lorraine is the bomb.

    21. Re:New to the US by estarriol · · Score: 1

      Ah no, I was in Colorado, mostly Denver. Sadly I didn't get a chance to visit the East Coast (yet!). Sainsbury's and Tesco have come on a lot in the last 2 years... generally the industry is becoming extremely competitive and given that people in the UK work a lot, prepared food is one of the key battlegrounds for the supermarkets. Thanks for the info.

    22. Re:New to the US by btellier · · Score: 1

      >Remember, the goals of industry in the US - any industry, are revenue and profit.

      What are the goals of food companies in other countries? Losing money? Minimizing profits and growing their business as slowly as possible? Or do you believe that many companies outside the US have found that happy medium between capitalism and socialism, where customers get low-priced, healthful, tasty food, and the company makes a small but sensible profit? Just enough profit so that the owners of the company live juuuuust a wee bit better than the average citizen, right?

      Get a grip man. It's not the US, it's nearly every successful company, food-based or otherwise, in any country on Earth.

    23. Re:New to the US by Sciros · · Score: 1

      Haha cheers for that distinction; if I had paused to think about it I might have thought of it, but it's still so much better to have it explained succinctly and with wit. :-)

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    24. Re:New to the US by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I do miss the coronation chicken sandwiches, I'll admit. And the cheese.

    25. Re:New to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have that form of Weetabix here in the US too. I know people who eat it every morning. It's great with chocolate milk (unhealthy yes I know).

    26. Re:New to the US by Damek · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, I know. Click my links and you'll see it's the same thing. In fact, here's the "standard" Weetabix. The company licenses their brand to Barbara's Bakery in the US.

      I just prefer the "Crispy Flakes & Fiber" version as it has more fiber & protein. A little more sugar, too, but not much. Sorry to see they don't have this version in the UK. But when I was there I had the biscuit version and it wasn't too much different, flavor-wise, so I still say, bring on the Weetabix in the morning! Great with yogurt.

    27. Re:New to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My response is completely off topic, but: your statement makes me think that you might share my appreciation of a related (and very minor) subtheme in the movie Kiss Kiss Bang Bang. I recommend the movie for many reasons, but in particular if you do end up renting it take note of the exchange between Val Kilmer and Robert Downey Jr about the word "badly"... had me laughing for hours.

    28. Re:New to the US by Bertie · · Score: 1

      You're right, and yet nonetheless, what you can buy in supermarkets in the UK nowadays is utter, utter shit. Unless, of course, you're stupid enough to pay a significant premium for what your local butcher/greengrocer/fishmonger would have provided you with as a matter of course before the supermarkets ran them into the ground.

    29. Re:New to the US by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I disagree. I think the US has gone off its rocker in pursuit of money. To put it in good old conservative religious terms, "The Great Whore of Babylon,' whoring after the almighty buck.

      Take a concrete example... You've been married 1/5/10/25 years, and you want to take your wife out to dinner. Do you want to take her to the restaurant with the *best* chef, or the most profitable restaurant - the one with the chef who got into that business for the money?

      Early in my career, I was visiting another semiconductor test center. The particular tester I was looking at had a "programmable knob" on the front, basically a shaft encoder whose function could be reassigned. As a joke, someone labeled it, "Yield". Of course on a tester, the only way you can deliberately crank up the "yield" is by cranking down the quality, assuming that the testing was correctly specified and implemented in the first place.

      Same for that magical knob called, "Profit." There is no such knob, and pretending there is, is stupid and shortsighted. In today's world, it seems that CxOs look at the knob labeled "Cost" and mistakenly think it's really "Profit" with a backwards scale. It sorta works, but it ain't really so. While every successful company pursues revenue and profit, there must be a balance between that and the function being delivered. From MY perspective, Ford and GM are in business to make cars available to me, and I don't give SPIT about profits to stockholders, since I'm not one of them. Perhaps they're just a little too focused on stockholder value, and not enough on delivering cars that people want, and that's why they're sliding downward from #1 and #2.

      IMHO, being too focused on making money may distract you from what the company is really supposed to be doing, and may not be good in the long term.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  16. IBS by theMerovingian · · Score: 4, Interesting


    That Activia stuff seems to help with irritable bowel syndrome (which in turn was caused by a $300/month starbucks habit). My wife is a dietitian and recommended I try it out.

    Now what we need is probiotic coffee so I can go back to a caffeine-fueled frenzy and finish this project I am working on.

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
    1. Re:IBS by Deagol · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      $300/month on coffee?!? That's more than my monthly house payment. Some people have more money than sense!

    2. Re:IBS by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      House? Less than $300 a month?

      Either way I agree $10 a day or close to $15 per workday is a bit MUCH. But not unusual for someone who has the money to spend, plenty of $5+ drinks available.

    3. Re:IBS by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      I can confirm (at least on my end) that it does help with IBS. I tried it for about two weeks and got pretty good results.

      However, I didn't stick to it for two reasons: 1) cost and 2) the only bulk packs I can find now are peaches and something.

      Why do bulk yogurt packs always have peaches and something? I hate peaches. Feh.

      Anyway, I just use Metamucil now, which has the same overall effect. So if you like peaches and have IBS, give it a whirl.

    4. Re:IBS by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      a $300/month starbucks habit
      In the UK, this would average out at about 2 cups a day, so I'm guessing it's a lot cheaper in the US...
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:IBS by Deagol · · Score: 1

      $273/month, and that's with a shitty 8.x% interest rate. The house was $40k, but the loan is just south of that much.

    6. Re:IBS by value_added · · Score: 1

      That Activia stuff seems to help with irritable bowel syndrome (which in turn was caused by a $300/month starbucks habit). My wife is a dietitian and recommended I try it out.

      Dude, buy yourself an espresso machine! Even the Barrista models Starbucks sell in their stores work quite well (assuming you have zero interest in learning the finer points of espresso machines), and should set you back about the same amount as a month of your current habit.

      And, yes, if you do drink large amounts of coffee (and drink it on an empty stomach), yoghurt is an excellent idea.

    7. Re:IBS by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Wow where do you live? Manufactured homes in the wheatfields here cost over $100,000 USD.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    8. Re:IBS by jweller · · Score: 1

      $273/month, and that's with a shitty 8.x% interest rate. The house was $40k, but the loan is just south of that much.

      where do you live? There isn't an apartment within 100 miles of my zip code I could rent for that, much less buy a house.

    9. Re:IBS by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      A $40K house? Consider yourself lucky. Here in the DC Metropolitan area, you're hard pressed to find a single-family detached house for $400K, and that's no exaggeration. I'm just glad I was able to get a house back in '98 before the market went through the roof otherwise we'd've had to move out of the area completely.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    10. Re:IBS by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

      You bought the UniBomber's shack?

    11. Re:IBS by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Considering the size of the payments he could have bought that a long time ago and still be paying it off.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    12. Re:IBS by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Na, property gets reaccessed to taxes occasionally. They would be paying $300 just in taxes if that was the case.

    13. Re:IBS by Deagol · · Score: 1

      Had the place for about 15 months. It was a bank repo. Aside from busted plumbing due to the house freezing, and having to clear out another family's crap (there was a *lot*), it's a nice place. Solid brick.

    14. Re:IBS by 0xA · · Score: 1

      It works for me too although I am certain that MSG and derivatives were the root cause of my bowel problems rather than generic "IBS".

    15. Re: IBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Activia helps the IBS stemming from the Starbucks habit? Not so much. Both milk and caffeine are triggers for Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS); it's true that the lactobacillus cultures (probiotics) make yoghurt, and the *lactobacillus* and other probiotics are medically helpful in enough cases of IBS that the effect shows up in medical studies of some rigor. Stopping coffee is probably the source of the effect in the correspondent with the Starbucks habit; that and a not-to-severe lactose intolerance probably did the trick.

      For coffee alternatives, see IBSTummychow.com or the ForMyTummy blog. I swear by a mocha half-coffee, half-roasted-soy blend from RocaMojo--but not when I'm taking antiobiotics.

      P.S. "Bifidis regularis" in the Activia ads probably is only half-fake Latin. I've seen "bifidis" as a preliminary word for some of the multitudes of names of good bacteria, but "regularis" doesn't ring true.

  17. I hate to break it to you all, but... by bluemonq · · Score: 1

    ...if your food isn't packed in a vacuum and it's not too hot, it probably has some live bacteria in it already, though maybe not the kind you want. Safety tip: never leave warm food out in the open too long. Oh, and unless you're at a super-fancy-expensive restaurant where they make *everything* the moment you order it, don't eat the hollandaise sauce. Raw egg yolks lying around = bad stuff.

    1. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by pryonic · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Or maybe we should just realise that we're designed to cope with a bit of bacteria and get away from this antibacterial over clean lifestyle we live before we destroy our immune systems forever.

      I saw a product on TV advertised earlier today: Vicks First Defense. It's an anti bacterial hand spray you can use after you've shook hands with someone or pressed a button in a left/elevator etc. I've been doing those things for years, and the worst I've had a little cold.

      I'm not saying don't wash your hands after using the toilet and don't take precautions with food, I'm just worried we're going too far. If we don't use our immune systems they'll become weak, and we'll be wiped out by some bug in the next century or so.

      Come on people, we surivived for years without all this over-sanitisation, I'm sure we can survive a few colds and a bit of stomach flu!

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    2. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Kandenshi · · Score: 1
      Come on people, we surivived for years without all this over-sanitisation...


      y'know, I generally speaking agree with you that things have gone too far, and that mild amounts of dirt/germs is a Good Thing overall, and that we've gone a bit far in our zeal for clean...

      But what was the average life expectancy 500/2000/5000 years ago again? :P Sure, our ancestors survived, but a hell of alot of people died because of diseases caused by poor sanitation too. People still are dying because of it. Like most things we need a healthy balance, and I'd probably rather we stick fairly close to our current approach rather than revert too far to the days of yore.
    3. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Come on people, we survived for years without all this over-sanitisation, I'm sure we can survive a few colds and a bit of stomach flu! That reminds me of an old joke:

      "How Middle-Ages people survived without the fridge?"
      "They didn't."

      But anyway... we live longer than even 30 yrs. ago (on average), and that is because of sanitisation (pollution on the other end is balancing things out.) Having said that tho, I do agree with you. I remember playing in the mud with my plastic soldiers something that would horrify many of today's mums and nothing terrible ever happened to me... a part from the evil monkey hidden in the wardrobe.
    4. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In fact the over-sterilisation of our environment has been linked with the rise in immune disorders such as asthma.

      I was always tought that it's good to let children get covered in mud occasionally so their immune systems get a good workout - and this was years ago. Seems that this advice is becoming accepted again.

    5. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by pryonic · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Agreed. I think the rise of food allergies is basically due to immune systems becoming 'bored'. They have nothing hostile to attack to they start attacking things like wheat, stomach linings, the lungs etc...

      Getting filthy is part of being a kid!

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    6. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by maxume · · Score: 1

      I agree with what you said, but no amount of rational thought can counter the heebie-jeebies I get from the handles and knobs on the doors in public restrooms.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      If we don't use our immune systems they'll become weak, and we'll be wiped out by some bug in the next century or so.

      Or just as bad: a lot of people are deciding that our overly clean environment breeds autoimmune disorders. The idea is that we have an exquisitely powerful immune system. If it doesn't find something to fight, it assumes it's not looking hard enough and turns up the sensitivity. It will eventually find a target, even if its own host.

      I don't know if this is accepted fact now or mainly conjecture, but I'm steering clear of the antibiotic hand soap anyway.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    8. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      What we need is to determine which microbes are good and which are bad. Then we need to eliminate the bad ones and encourage the good ones.

      Any unknown source (a door knob) should be treated as potentially having bad bacteria. But your oversimplification (we should have more bacteria, harmful and helpful) is dumb. Fewer illnesses is only a good thing.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    9. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying don't wash your hands after using the toilet and don't take precautions with food, I'm just worried we're going too far. If we don't use our immune systems they'll become weak, and we'll be wiped out by some bug in the next century or so.

      Come on people, we surivived for years without all this over-sanitisation, I'm sure we can survive a few colds and a bit of stomach flu!


      Well, I'd rather live in a world without the common oold or season sneezing and coughing. I'm not worried about any bug wiping out humanity. That's an overstated risk. Diseases just breed and its not to their evolutionary benefit to kill their hosts. We might have something breakout and spread through the developed world withing a month and everyone know is hacking, sneezing, coughing, or running to the bathroom. Any of the really nasties that basically disables a person or gives the hives, rashes, 100+ fever, or really annoying side effects would be slower spreading and if we had an outbreak of something like that we'd really start over sanitizing. Let's be honest. Sanitization has saved more lives and prevented more plagues than our vaulted medical community has. Sanitization is the only real method that we have to prevent and control the outbreak of disease. All it would take to eliminate the hand shake as a social welcoming custom or casual hugs with non family member would be one really heavy outbreak. Elimination of those two things would reduce disease transmission. Really, we need a list of 10 things everyone could do on a daily basis to reduce their infection potential and start teaching it in public schools.

      Genetically, we could survive in really nasty enivornments. We could exist with heavy diseased percentages of the population, but why if we don't have to?

    10. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by pryonic · · Score: 1
      You've missed my point here. I'm saying your body needs the bad microbes to remain healthy. It seem may illogical at first but you have to use your immune system to keep it strong. Your body is constantly fighting off bad bacteria and virii but because you have a strong immune system you rarely feel ill. Illness is caused when they get a foothold and it takes your immune system a while to catch up. If we use science to eliminate *all* the bad bacteria when a new bad bacteria comes along it'll be too weak and underused to fight it off

      As other posters have said in replies to my post the rise in over sanitised conditions has been linked to the rise in auto-immune diseases and food allergies. These are diseases where the immune system starts attacking benign things such as wheat or your own lung. The line of thinking is that the immune system is so underused it starts attacking something harmless as it's not occupied fighting of the usual everyday infections we hardly even notice.

      So no, I don't think that removing all 'bad' bacteria is a good idea at all. I also don't think my idea is 'dumb'...

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    11. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      Amen to the voice of reason. Things like anti bacterial wipes are going to do us in just as throughly as global warming, nuclear war or republican politics. Our bodies *need* to be exposed to bacteria, bugs, sundry muck to enable our immune systems to work properly, either recognising and combating new ones or refreshing our ability to fight off known targets. One of the reasons we get less colds as we get older is that there are only so many variants and after a while we've learned to fight off a larger percentage of them.
      As the OP said, wash your hands after the toilet and when preparing food. Anything else is going to hurt you more than help you.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    12. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

      >Getting filthy is part of being a kid!
      Damned right. These days, if your kid eats mud they get bundled off for a life sentence of Ritalin or somesuch. I used to. know a girl who liked to eat ants.
      Thinking about it, maybe she needed help, but apart from her, it's good to get involved with the mud.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    13. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Pragmatix · · Score: 1

      In fact a friend of mine is a pediatrician, and he told me that the best thing you can do for your kid is to put them into day care, because they be exposed to all kinds of germs at an early age which will help develop their immune system.

    14. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      Oh, and unless you're at a super-fancy-expensive restaurant where they make *everything* the moment you order it, don't eat the hollandaise sauce. Raw egg yolks lying around = bad stuff.

      I make and eat hollandaise sauce all the time, 'cause I love it, and I've never had any ill effects from eating it. I even eat it after it has been left-over.

    15. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stay away from my kids. I don't want them growing up with paranoia about shaking hands or touching doorknobs.

    16. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by GeePrime · · Score: 1
    17. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by bluemonq · · Score: 1

      But do you keep the leftovers at room temperature, like it's supposed to be served at?

    18. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the downside to this is that you get the diseases too. But hey, some good fevertime with your family, beats disney world anytime !

    19. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Again, that's an oversimplification. If we were to cause extinction of HIV, we have nothing to lose and everything to gain. The immune systems aren't either "strong" or "weak." In many cases they provide antibodies for SPECIFIC diseases. Having antibodies for a certain disease won't necessarily help you fighting another disease, so it is better to not encounter that disease at all.

      With that said, it is a very complex set of systems. There are some cases where seemingly-harmful disease exposure has some benefits. But for a lot of diseases, there is NO BENEFIT WHATSOEVER in being exposed to them--only harm. THAT is why your idea is a dumb oversimplification.

      All we have to do is avoid serious plague for a little while longer (100 years perhaps?) and we will be able to create artificial antibodies, thus wiping disease out as we know it. So I caution you not to support immune strengthening through natural selection or any other crazy idea like that.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    20. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Please stay away from my kids. I don't want them growing up with paranoia about shaking hands or touching doorknobs.

      Hey, I hate actually sending my kids to school. I have nothing against public school, but most of the common colds that travel home do so through our kids going to school. Sanitization (washing hands after going to the bathroom and avoiding generally touching other people unless needed or getting breathed on)needs to be stressed more than it is. I have nothing against shaking hands, but it is the one acceptable form of touch other than maybe hugs and both involve body contact. I didn't think about doorknobs, but yes they spread disease as well. I wouldn't worry about my doorknobs, but I work in a building open to the public. I have no idea how many sick people may have been in or out of the building. Heck, I can smell some people not bathing. Trust me its not that much of paranoia when I can smell others.

    21. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let your kids get a few colds, they'll be fine. And yes, maybe you'll catch a cold or the flu from someone coming through your building. You'll be fine too. I could not take a shower for a week, come down with a cold, cough all over my hands, shake your hand and give you a hug. Trust me, it won't kill you.

    22. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by kabocox · · Score: 1

      Let your kids get a few colds, they'll be fine. And yes, maybe you'll catch a cold or the flu from someone coming through your building. You'll be fine too. I could not take a shower for a week, come down with a cold, cough all over my hands, shake your hand and give you a hug. Trust me, it won't kill you.

      Genetically we are the same and my system and my kid's sytem could handle it fine. Do I want you or your kind anywhere near my family if I can help it? Not on your life. I hate smokers and those that emit oders as forcefully invading my personal air space. Those that smoke, emit oders including perfume, from too much drink body from lack of regular bathing/showering, and those that knowingly purposely spread disease should all have the same social stigma as worse than sex offenders that aim for little kids. I don't mind you doing your thing, but you better not let my senses be aware that you and your friends are doing your thing and that includes smell. The human nose is the most underused air sampling tool that we have.

    23. Re:I hate to break it to you all, but... by Bertie · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the first item on the list would be "don't try to sterilise the world. You can't."

      Sensible precautions are all well and good, but you're fighting a losing battle if you think you can keep germs permanently at bay. One of these days something's going to sneak up on you unawares, and your immune system won't know what's hit it. Meanwhile, I'll have a bit of a cold.

  18. Trouble stomachs by Lazerf4rt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The fastest way to consumers' hearts may be through their troubled stomachs.

    Maybe if the food industry didn't fuck so much with food to maximize profits in the first place, people wouldn't have so many troubled stomachs?

    1. Re:Trouble stomachs by Deagol · · Score: 1
      If people weren't such dumb-asses and ate obviously-labeled shit to begin with, people wouldn't have so many troubled stomachs.

      As much as I despise the shit food industry, people themselves are at least 50% culpable for their poor choices.

    2. Re:Trouble stomachs by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      50% of people are below average at wise choice making, they entrust those with more wisdom to use theirs for the benefit of all.
      Too bad that the bad choice makers are also bad at choosing good choice makers.

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    3. Re:Trouble stomachs by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      A basic rule of thumb for those without a sense for quality food....

      If it has a shelf life of more than a few days when exposed to air it's no good for you. Imagine what it takes for your body to break it down (hint >> more acids) and even if the body can break it down completely (often not the case), what benefit are you really getting out of it?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    4. Re:Trouble stomachs by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Flour, lentils of all kinds, sugar, rice, oats, etc... are all bad for you then? Man, this is really going to affect my diet, it's going to be hard to cook if I can't use staple foods.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:Trouble stomachs by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      I don't think the GP is talking about people chowing down on cheezedoodles and BigMacs, wondering why they feel queasy and their cholesterol is through the roof. I think he was referring to the factory farming conditions that pump livestock full of antibiotics and steroids while living in squalid conditions. As long as they can hide behind the "cremate your food to 180 degrees before eating" caveat, they can continue selling sick and drugged up animals for food.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    6. Re:Trouble stomachs by xoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Like apples? Carrots? Potatoes? Tomatoes? Would you liek to think that rule of thumb through and then repost?

    7. Re:Trouble stomachs by foniksonik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rule of thumb as in general rule for a lot of stuff. But yes.. typical flour you get has been processed to the point where it gives you nothing but calories when you eat something made with it. It's been broken down beyond nutritional value, bleached of all the remaining vitamins, irradiated to remove any trace organisms and then "refortified" with lab made vitamins that your body doesn't react to, much less use.

      Refined sugar is the same. Nothing but empty calories. Refined white rice, same story.

      Oats... oats won't last long out in the open... they'll go stale first (absorbing moisture, then re-drying) then they'll start to rot like they should. I wouldn't advise storing your oats in open air containers. Lentils are also good. This type of food is typically freeze-dried which is not too much of a problem but try to find grains and seeds that haven't been irradiated... they'll taste much better, though they will go bad (a few weeks later) as soon as you expose them to air and the little micros reactivate...

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    8. Re:Trouble stomachs by xoyoyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, lentils are dried in sensible countries using the traditional air-drying method. They might freeze-dry them in the US, but the lentils I buy in the UK are dried by passing warm dry air over the wet legumes.

      Flour is scarcely empty carbohydrate, given that the bleaching is intended to raise the level of gluten in the flour and gluten is a protein. And which bleaching are you concerned about? The chemical variety (which is bad) or the slower air based process?

      Given that I've just pointed out two staple foods that are actually produced by taking a food product and *exposing* it to the air I think your argument is already holed and taking on water. But lets look at some other common foodstuffs:

      Most meat is actually prepared by allowing it to hang (in the open air). You'd find unhung beef, for example, too tough to eat. In some cases (such as high quality ham) the meat is hung for so long it desiccates and becomes cured, meaning it can be stored in the open air without refridgeration (NB, the best way to store such cured meat is in a cool place covered in a cloth so that the air can still get to it, but flies can't). The same is true of cheese.

      Some foodstuffs require exposure to the air to complete their maturation: notably bananas and apples. You'll also ruin a good camembert by sticking it in a fridge or in a sealed container: that's why the fancy ones come in wooden containers. To keep the bacteria alive. It'll be edible, but it'll just taste like soft plastic.

      Some foodstuffs are actively harmed by sealing away from the air: mushrooms stay fresh longer of they are allowed access to the air. Stick a mushroom in a sealed container and it'll liquefy. (The reason that mushrooms sold in supermarket-style plastic wrap don't liquefy is that they are not in contact with the air: the gas in the container is nitrogen).

    9. Re:Trouble stomachs by Kismet · · Score: 1

      A good point. It appears to me that the consensus among nutrition experts who are not on the payroll of the dairy, food, or supplement corporations, is that there currently isn't enough scientific evidence to form good theories about most dietary supplements. While the beneficial effects of whole foods, particularly plant based foods, are well documented, the present frenzy of artificial supplements is pseudoscience at best and fraud at worst. This doesn't mean that there is no value to supplements or engineered food, but why don't we just get our nutrients from natural sources? Someone has convinced us that artificial is better, even when they can't prove that it's true. Great marketing!

    10. Re:Trouble stomachs by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes, but 50% of people are above average at wise choice making...

      --
      Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  19. Healthy Diet by WiseMuse · · Score: 0

    Folks, if you want to feel good and be regular, eat a well-balanced diet! Remove the refined foods and add the whole foods. Eat multi-grain pasta and multi-grain bread. Drink lots of water. If you aren't regular after a plate of multi-grain pasta and 2 slices of multi-grain bread and a half-gallon of fresh water (not cool-aid, for example), go see a doctor!

  20. Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's sake by Merkwurdigeliebe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While from the article I can gather there is merit to probiotic food, let's hope it does not become another coöpted marketing fad whereby anything and everything is labelled probiotic just for the sake of riding the coattails of the success of producs where such bacteria do make health sense and is important.

    I can forsee this parallelling the fat-free craze where they'd (food companies) label things which always were naturally fat free labelled as being-100% fat free (implying that competing products not labelled so did have fat.) I'm surprised no-one ever went so far as labelling water as fat-free.

  21. WTF is this stuff doing on SlashDot? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Informative

    WTF is this stuff doing on SlashDot?

    Yogurt contains live cultures? No shit. Thanks for the fourth-grade science lesson.

    Let's get a couple stories for the IQ > 60 set out here today, please.

    1. Re:WTF is this stuff doing on SlashDot? by Deagol · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Have you browsed the yogurt aisle at your local grocery store lately? You need to actually read labels to make sure you're getting the stuff w/ live, active cultures. Ditto sour cream. If you're lucky, maybe 3 brands out of 20 will have the stuff. These days, it's not the no-brainer you make it out to be.

    2. Re:WTF is this stuff doing on SlashDot? by AtomicJake · · Score: 1

      Just showing that the NYT author and the slashdot submitter would better engaged the brain before writing ...

    3. Re:WTF is this stuff doing on SlashDot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that setting the bar a little too high for the average Slashdot reader though?

    4. Re:WTF is this stuff doing on SlashDot? by Den_onda_kotten · · Score: 2, Informative

      It is if you're living in Europe. (At least in sweden, I've never seen yogurt without live bacteria anywhere over here)

    5. Re:WTF is this stuff doing on SlashDot? by Supermuttonpie · · Score: 1

      Developing and delivering probiotic's is serious science. People with a low IQ would mistake this story as a statement of "Yogurt contains live cultures" cause that's the point of the product. I don't have much faith in this one but it's serious stuff in the farming world (both terrestrial and aquatic). My favourite use of probiotic was in the Russian space program, I believe they marketed it to the public as being cosmonaut-good, a genius bit of marketing.... "Today there is a Russian yogurt cultured from bacteria in the saliva and guts of cosmonauts aboard Mir station. Spaceflight stress upset their immunity, according to the Moscow Institute of Biomedical Problems. That allowed bad bacteria to attack good bacteria. Microbiologists developed the yogurt in the 1980s as a remedy. Cosmonauts ate yogurt before blast-off. Today, it comes as fruit-flavored yogurt, cottage cheese and traditional Russian cheeses studded with garlic and herbs." http://www.spacetoday.org/History/SpaceFactoids/Sp aceFactoids2.html

    6. Re:WTF is this stuff doing on SlashDot? by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      Yeah, who cares about food? It's not like there could be anything interesting or scientific about bacteria. No, let's just keep slurping down pizza and Mountain Dew and not think about what we're putting into our bodies.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  22. If something in your food is moving by Taagehornet · · Score: 1

    Then don't eat it!

    Reminded me of a poll jwz put up, pointing to the story: The Worm Within

    I'm definitely with jwz on this one: Save that fucker, wash it off, and put it in a jar on your mantle labeled with your name, the date, and "Sample #0001"

    1. Re:If something in your food is moving by maxume · · Score: 1

      So what's in the jar yiu have labeled "Sample #0000"?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  23. hooker by +uhmaster2000+ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    better than a $5 hooker

    --
    Iz licken teh secs
  24. Success with probiotics by xtermz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TMI WARNING! If talk of bodily functions disturbs you, go to the next post... ...With that in mind, I've had measurable success with taking probiotics ( in pill form ). I suffer from IBS, and suppose I can be called "overly regular". Since taking probiotic pills, I've notice more "normal" feeling, um, functions. Even if I stuck to a good diet, things were different until I did the probiotics.

    Theres been some research, and lots of controversy, suggesting that the overabundance of antibiotics in our food, as well as the overuse of them by doctors and such, is just ruining our GI tract. There's lots of people walking around these days who probably cant' even remember what a normal bm is anymore. But ya, probiotics do appear to help.

    --


    I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
    1. Re:Success with probiotics by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      I had the same erm.. sucess..

      I can't touch dairy normally, yet when I took these drinks I could eat or drink anything and be perfectly fine. It was really strange but it did seem to work.

      --
      I like muppets.
    2. Re:Success with probiotics by maxume · · Score: 1

      It's quite likely that your body cannot properly digest lactose. Lactobacillus acidophilus, which is found in yogurt and other such things does it for you, and prevents other stuff from using it.

      See:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactose_intolerance

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Success with probiotics by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Erm no.. It's IBS, my body used to deal with lactose fine :)

      --
      I like muppets.
    4. Re:Success with probiotics by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Uhhh... IBS is irritable bowel syndrome. Syndrome is a group of symptoms. So Irritable bowel syndrome is just the doctor saying, yeah, your bowels hurt, and I don't want to, or can't figure out why. It's a little like calling something a UFO. It is admitting that they don't now what it is. So, lactose intolerance IS a form of IBS.

      My wife accidentally cured her IBS when she went on the Atkins diet. After a few weeks, it was gone. When she quit the diet, the IBS never came back. We are pretty sure that the problem was that she wasn't getting enough fat in her diet.

    5. Re:Success with probiotics by maxume · · Score: 1

      If it is highly correlated with eating stuff with lactose in it, and it goes away when you do stuff that gets rid of the lactose, you might do well to pretend it is caused by the lactose...

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Success with probiotics by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      and that is eactly what I do. :)

      There are other quirks but basicly "I'm allergic to dairy" :)

      --
      I like muppets.
    7. Re:Success with probiotics by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      Erm no.. It's IBS, my body used to deal with lactose fine :)

      Lactose intolerance can develop at any point in your life, not just in youth. It becomes more common the older you are. You could always have yourself checked out by a doctor just to be sure, or you could try drinking lactose-free milk to see if it gives you any problems.

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  25. Fat free ! by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised no-one ever went so far as labelling water as fat-free.

    Haven't you seen fet-free cooking oil spray ? It's main ingredient is canola oil, but it's fat free because each 0.5 gram serving contains zero grams of fat (rounded down).

  26. Not all bacteria are motile, by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

    and thus not all are necessarily what we might consider "moving." The non-motile ones might move a little bit from pushing each other away as they reproduce, but it's silly to assume all bacteria move under their own power.

  27. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  28. something is moving by TheCybernator · · Score: 1

    "Mom!!, something is moving in my food."

    "Shut up and Eat."

  29. Slashvertisement (this is 1930 technology) by knightmad · · Score: 3, Informative

    Brazilian people (and people from other countries) have been drinking Yakult since ever, and this kind of yogurt was (and I quote) "invented by Kyoto University pediatrics doctor Minoru Shirota in 1930". Here in Europe there is the Danone's Actimel, that is basically the same (I tasted both, I know) but with a new brand and a massive advertisement.

    I'm mentioning that because IMHO this article is nothing but advertisement, passing something as a technological evolution but in fact, unless 30s technology counts as one, its nothing but another way slashdot got to sell your eyeballs.

    1. Re:Slashvertisement (this is 1930 technology) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, I was just visiting the comments to point the same thing out. (I grew up drinking Yakult in Hong Kong, myself...)

    2. Re:Slashvertisement (this is 1930 technology) by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      I've tasted both and seen the results of one and the zero effect of the other.

      --
      I like muppets.
    3. Re:Slashvertisement (this is 1930 technology) by knightmad · · Score: 1

      And what is "the one"?

    4. Re:Slashvertisement (this is 1930 technology) by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Yakult did nothing, the other one (I can't recall the name but you listed it. Been up all night you see) worked great and was the only thing to cure my stomach cramps.

      --
      I like muppets.
    5. Re:Slashvertisement (this is 1930 technology) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogurt

      "There is evidence of cultured milk products being produced as food for at least 4,500 years, since the 3rd millennium BC."

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yogurt#Yoghurt_Drinks

      I suspect this kind of beverage existed long before last century.

    6. Re:Slashvertisement (this is 1930 technology) by Guzzitza · · Score: 1

      Have to agree with the parent, Yakult has been sold here in Australia for at least the last 10 years. However by the sounds of it, your Dairy Dept. in the USA sounds pretty horrible. If every cheese you have over there is like that plastic "Ämerican Cheese" crap they put on my Subway, theres no wonder your amazed at the prospect of bacteria in your dairy!

  30. It's not the prebioticness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, in Germany it's called Danone, in the USA Dannon, but the difference in quality isn't about prebiotic or whatever stuff.

    Buy a vanilla yoghurt in Germany and an American one. The German one tastes nice (really, German vanilla yoghurt is SOOO good) and fresh, while the American one has Gelatin in it (feels very awkwardly slimy) and the flavor is just plain awful. Don't ask me why. I wrote them an email, but you know that doesn't do anything.

    I've been to other countries, like Ireland, and always wondered why they can't just make good good without crappy additives. It tastes better, keeps fresh just as long (even without preservatives, my food doesn't catch mold in the fridge), and I have no idea why they put all that stuff (Gelatin, weird flavorings, artificial colors... do colorful jelly beans taste any better??) in there in the first place...

    1. Re:It's not the prebioticness by xelah · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Well, in Germany it's called Danone, in the USA Dannon,

      Sshhhh! Don't let the Americans know it's French!

      I've been to other countries, like Ireland, and always wondered why they can't just make good good without crappy additives. It tastes better, keeps fresh just as long (even without preservatives, my food doesn't catch mold in the fridge), and I have no idea why they put all that stuff (Gelatin, weird flavorings, artificial colors... do colorful jelly beans taste any better??) in there in the first place...


      Boil some milk. Let it cool to ~40oC. Stir in some (live!) yoghurt and leave where you leave your bread to rise it all day. Quite thick, isn't it? Now pump it through some industrial food processing machinery. You'll probably find it's not thick any more. Add gelatine. Thick again? Good....now you can sell it.

      They seem to use starches of various kinds in the UK, rather than gelatine. Same reason, though.

      The weird flavourings are there because they're cheaper than real things with flavour, and the small amounts of real things are there so that they can put them on the label. In any case, putting lumps of, say, strawberry in a yoghurt doesn't produce strawberry flavoured yoghurt...it produces yoghurt-tasting-yoghurt with lumps of strawberry in it. The sugar is there because there isn't enough real stuff with sugar in in there, and because people seem to like their yoghurt sweet. Personally, I prefer to buy plain yoghurt and add unrefined dark brown sugar.
    2. Re:It's not the prebioticness by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Sshhhh! Don't let the Americans know it's French!

      Like that statue that the guy in NY named his french fries after.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:It's not the prebioticness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, most German yogurt tastes better...

      And most of them have neither starches nor gelatine in them.

      And to top it all, we're about the cheapest country regarding food. So I don't see why it would be impossible to make good yogurt without gelatine, or why it would be expensive with some level of fruit in there.

  31. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too late, there has been an explosion in probiotic products in the UK. My favourite advert is for Danone Activia.

    They say in the advert that they have it to a group of women and asked them how they felt afterwards. Of course most of them described some kind of improvement in their wellbeing. I'd bet money that they'd say the same thing if you gave them custard and described it as a breakthrough in healthcare.

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  32. Bribe your body by pzs · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    This is a general trend where you can get the consumer to cough up cash to make themselves feel better about how generally unhealthy they are.

    - Eaten one too many big-macs this week? Why not take our an annual subscription to the gym! We don't actually care if you don't come, as long as you pay.

    - Had another night on the bevies? Why not drink some of this foul muck? It will pacify your conscience!

    - Hopelessly overweight? It's not your fault! You must be one of the minute percentage of people who have a genuine obesity disorder, rather than because you're a lazy slob. Why not have your stomach stapled/pay for some other expensive surgery?

    Being healthy is not complicated and hardly ever involves eating gimmicky probiotics. Just eat a balanced diet with plenty of fruit and vegetables and exercise regularly. Unfortunately, you can't sell any book/diet/fad food item with this advice, because for some people it involves genuine effort, rather than just effort-free financial outlay.

    Peter

    1. Re:Bribe your body by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      And what about problems which arn't caused by bad health? Things like IBS can be helped (even cured) by these things.

      But hey, if you'd rather blame people for everything that happens to them go ahead and do so.

      --
      I like muppets.
    2. Re:Bribe your body by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was under the impression that that latest research indicated IBS was essentially indistinguishable from stress, i.e., the symptoms were psychosomatic.

    3. Re:Bribe your body by pzs · · Score: 1

      IBS sounds to me like a medical condition, which can be diagnosed by a doctor and treated with a prescription treatment. A multi-million pound market with saturation peak time advertising is hardly aimed at this kind of medical market.

      Another one of these things that really hacks me off is over-the-counter symptom suppressors like Lemsip. You've got an infection and your body is fighting it off. What you should do is drink this sweet powder which will reduce your body's defenses to the infection (like a high temperature) and give you the illusion that you're better. This will in all likelihood make you ill for longer. That will be £5 please.

      Peter

    4. Re:Bribe your body by Sciros · · Score: 1

      Well since what troubles ill people (and keeps them from coming into work and/or being productive) are indeed these physical symptoms, then suppressing them is exactly what many are looking for. If as you suggest it takes the body an extra couple of days to fight off the infection "in the background," so to speak, that's not really a big deal to almost anyone as long as nothing worse comes of it.

      It's not the "illusion" that one's healthy, but the *feeling* that [makes one believe] one is healthy that's important much of the time.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
  33. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New craze in tatoos. Huge numbers of men getting "probiotic" tatoos. Women being astute bargain shoppers are swallowing this excellent source of free protein say the ads for the tattoos.

  34. Hmmmm... by rspress · · Score: 1

    I just got a Hormel Boneless chicken patty with Mashed potatoes and gravy meal with a chicken bone in it........is that close enough?

    1. Re:Hmmmm... by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      Is that supposed to be some sort of sustenance ?

      Let me guess, fat pig ?

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    2. Re:Hmmmm... by rspress · · Score: 1

      Is that supposed to be some sort of sustenance ?
       
      Let me guess, fat pig ?
       
        It is called a quick meal when I don't have time to cook a complete meal, most of which are vegetables only, sometimes a little beef or chicken. Fish if there is something good in, like Ahi.

      Let me guess, gay boy vegan?
  35. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by pryonic · · Score: 2, Informative
    Do you know what food marketing fad I hate at the moment? All this organic nonsense that is being sold in the UK.

    Organic potatoes, apples, milk... I thought these were organic products by definition, along with beef, chicken and orange juice. Maybe I'm wrong and they're made in a lab from nylon and plastic... I'm sure it is better for us that they're not covered in quite as many pesticides but quite a few dangerous chemicals are allowed to be used and the product called organic so it's all marketing ****shit. And the stuff is about twice the price...

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  36. Lactobacillus bulgaricus by Maimun · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Bulgarians consider their country as the original inventor and genuine producer of sour milk, which is called "yogurt" in English. I dunno if that is true or not but in my humble experience, Bulgarian genuine yogurt is much tastier than any alternative I have tasted; those include several North American brands of yogurt that I tried in Canada and a brand of Greek yogurt sold in Canadian Oriental food stores.

    Saying that yogurt has live bacteria in it is like saying water has H_2 O molecules: of course it does! Here is a wiki link that describes pretty accurately, to the best of my knowledge, the bacteria species that makes yogurt out of fresh milk.

    Dannon's products should be avoided. The worst brand-name yogurt in Bulgaria is theirs. It has the most artificial taste of all the surrogates that are sold as yogurt. If you have tasted the real thing, you will recognise their product as junk food (as long as you are not a junk-food addict :-) ).

    1. Re:Lactobacillus bulgaricus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it is from the Caucasus, and most Eastern-EU (former russian dominated) states are well aware of it. Then Danone just bought the market in name of "privatization" and Auchan/Tesco/Cora/Lidl/Whatever started selling junk.

    2. Re:Lactobacillus bulgaricus by juhaz · · Score: 1

      The bacteria makes yogurt, yes, but guess how many of them are live after ultra high temperature (or even "normal") pasteurization?

  37. OMG! by ErGalvao · · Score: 1

    Waiter! There's an Escherichia coli in my soup!

    --
    Er Galvão Abbott - IT Consultant and Developer
  38. Want bacteria with that? by TheMohel · · Score: 2, Informative
    Probiotics in food are part of a larger trend toward 'functional foods,' which stress their ability to deliver benefits that have traditionally been the realm of medicine or dietary supplements.
    And so slouches the Baby Boom generation toward their inevitable mortality, scrambling and clutching madly at every huckster's promise to improve "health" and "longevity." This is a minor example of the sort, of course, but it is just as well documented and proven as the others. Which is to say, not.
     
    The primary "benefit" delivered by Activa is indeed that of the dietary supplements (and not a few medicines), which is to separate the victim from their available cash and deliver fuzzy science and placebo effect in return.
     
    There is limited data that active culture supplementation can reduce diarrhea duration in acute gastroenteritis, although the studies are small. The effect in irritable bowel syndrome is contentious, but then virtually everything in irritable bowel syndrome is contentious, including the existence of the syndrome as such. In already-healthy people, Activa has no well-supported benefit of which I am aware.
     
    For myself (and as a practicing physician), I don't have a problem with it - if you like your flavored spoiled milk with extra bacteria, by all means, partake. Nearly all food is nonsterile. Much of it has quite a lot of bacteria, and most of them (Taco Bell notwithstanding) are relatively harmless. Personally, I rather prefer Pop-Tarts.
    1. Re:Want bacteria with that? by tehcyder · · Score: 1
      Personally, I rather prefer Pop-Tarts.
      Why are you bringing them into a discussion about food?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:Want bacteria with that? by foniksonik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a practicing physician you should know better. 90% of the 'food' on the shelfs of your local grocer is equivalent to cardboard when it comes to nutritional value. It's all been injected with just enough vitamin content to be called a food when really it's nothing but sugars and starches and a little bit of cotton seed oil (which is toxic if unprocessed) to hold it all together. Perfect example is Pop-Tarts. You'd die of a wide variety of vitamin deficiencies if all you eat are Pop-Tarts... which is how a lot of kids live, on the edge of vitamin deficiency, and we wonder why they have difficulty paying attention in class or why they come down with so many auto-immune syndromes.

      It's 'professionals' like you who lead the american citizens into seriously unhealthy lifestyles. Oh well, guess a guy's got to make a living and what would physicians do if everyone were naturally healthy?

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    3. Re:Want bacteria with that? by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 1

      For myself (and as a practicing physician), I don't have a problem with it - if you like your flavored spoiled milk with extra bacteria, by all means, partake. Nearly all food is nonsterile. Much of it has quite a lot of bacteria, and most of them (Taco Bell notwithstanding) are relatively harmless. Personally, I rather prefer Pop-Tarts.

      Mix a high-sugar diet (Pop-Tarts?) and antibiotics over time and watch what happens. The antibiotics will wipe out much of the "good" bacteria in your large intestine, making room for yeast (candida albicans, fed by sugar) to grow and cause all sorts of problems. Switching to a low-sugar diet, taking antifungals (Nystatin, Diflucan, or possibly some of the "natural" antifungals), and taking probiotics to recolonize the gut is a plausible way to restore the system. In my case merely cutting out refined sugar made a HUGE difference. Losing weight was a nice bonus.

      It'd be nice if proper scientific studies were done to prove all of this rather than having to rely on mere experience, but there's no magic patentable drug likely to result so nutritional solutions are usually dismissed. The doctor who figured out that hand-washing was a good idea was fired for his heresy too.

      BTW, I hope you're enjoying the petroleum in your Pop-Tarts. That's what the synthetic coloring is made from. So are most artificial flavorings and preservatives (BHA, BHT, TBHQ), which I didn't see in the Pop-Tarts ingredients list but I bet most of the rest of your processed foods contain them. See the Feingold Association website for info on how that stuff is contributing heavily to ADHD and other neurological disorders. No wonder Whole Foods Market is growing like crazy.

    4. Re:Want bacteria with that? by ahoehn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As the son of a physician and husband of a medical student, TheMohel's attitude isn't particularly surprising. All too often, physicians have to watch as patients eschew real medicine for "naturopathic" remedies. Even I've seen a friend stop treatment for multiple sclerosis and spend thousands of dollars on magic "natural" pills being sold by a huckster. It's disgusting to see seriously sick people preyed on. I would guess that's where TheMohel's negativity comes from.

      On the other hand, there's a big difference between trying to cure cancer with St. John's Wart and trying to stave off cancer by eating healthfully.

      --
      Mod my comments down. It'll be fun.
    5. Re:Want bacteria with that? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      As a practicing physician you should know better. 90% of the 'food' on the shelfs of your local grocer is equivalent to cardboard when it comes to nutritional value.

      To put it simply - No. That's FUD spread by a variety of sources with their own agendas to promote.
       
       
      It's all been injected with just enough vitamin content to be called a food when really it's nothing but sugars and starches and a little bit of cotton seed oil (which is toxic if unprocessed) to hold it all together.

      In the first place sugars and starches are nutritional content - if all you ate was vitamin pills, you'd die of starvation. Furthermore, if it has vitamins added, then it doesn't have the 'nutrional value of cardboard'. (You can't have it both ways, either it has nutritional content - or it doesn't. The source of that content, when present, is a different issue entirely.)
       
       
      Perfect example is Pop-Tarts. You'd die of a wide variety of vitamin deficiencies if all you eat are Pop-Tarts...

      You are completely correct, it is a perfect example - of the high FUD content of your posting.
       
      Even if you took the basic ingredients of Pop-Tarts from the shelves of an organic grocery store and made your own Pop-Tarts - you'd *still* suffer from a wide variety of vitamin deficiencies. The same is true of many singular foods (whether they have a singular ingredient or are a composite), regardless of whether they come from $MEGA_STORE or $HEALTHFOOD_STORE.
    6. Re:Want bacteria with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And so slouches the Baby Boom generation toward their inevitable mortality, scrambling and clutching madly at every huckster's promise to improve "health" and "longevity."

      Hmm. I think this is what you meant to say:

      And so slouches humanity toward their inevitable mortality, scrambling and clutching madly at every huckster's promise to improve "health" and "longevity."

    7. Re:Want bacteria with that? by TheMohel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thank you, and yes. I have no problem with people trying to eat healthy foods, and my Pop-Tarts comment was irony (which is a dangerous thing on Slashdot), but there is no actual scientific evidence that live culture yogurt does very much for you. It's not harmful, and nobody is foregoing any particular treatment by eating it (unlike the St. John's Wort example, which I've seen). My negativity is the same that I have for any salesman claiming too much for their product.

      I have an astonishing fact for people: Activa was created in marketing focus groups, the message was polished to a fine luster with interviews with consumers, and the only reason it is being sold is because its manufacturer wants to make money. This is the way of the world, and I don't even object, but there aren't any altruists here. The product doesn't have to have any value beyond being marketable and, in this case, it really doesn't.

    8. Re:Want bacteria with that? by zanderredux · · Score: 1
      but there aren't any altruists here
      According to this article, there is a lot of brain-damaged people out there, being perpetuated by the mechanism of capitalism instead of natural selection, but I digress.
    9. Re:Want bacteria with that? by Raenex · · Score: 1
      Even if you took the basic ingredients of Pop-Tarts from the shelves of an organic grocery store and made your own Pop-Tarts - you'd *still* suffer from a wide variety of vitamin deficiencies. The same is true of many singular foods (whether they have a singular ingredient or are a composite), regardless of whether they come from $MEGA_STORE or $HEALTHFOOD_STORE.

      The problem is that a lot of food looks like Pop-Tarts. Look at the ingredients list of packaged food. It's nearly all the same. It's crap-food with the same crap-ingredients: refined flour, high fructose corn syrup, and partially hydrogenated oil. This is not healthy, wholesome food.

      You can buy wholesome foods at $MEGA_STORE. It's just that 90% of $MEGA_STORE is crap food.

    10. Re:Want bacteria with that? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      Even if you took the basic ingredients of Pop-Tarts from the shelves of an organic grocery store and made your own Pop-Tarts - you'd *still* suffer from a wide variety of vitamin deficiencies. The same is true of many singular foods (whether they have a singular ingredient or are a composite), regardless of whether they come from $MEGA_STORE or $HEALTHFOOD_STORE.

      The problem is that a lot of food looks like Pop-Tarts. Look at the ingredients list of packaged food. It's nearly all the same. It's crap-food with the same crap-ingredients: refined flour, high fructose corn syrup, and partially hydrogenated oil. This is not healthy, wholesome food.

      Repeating FUD doesn't change it's nature. 'Healthy' and 'wholesome' are buzzwords, not useful descriptors of food attributes.
       
       
      You can buy wholesome foods at $MEGA_STORE. It's just that 90% of $MEGA_STORE is crap food.

      When you use fuzzy buzz words like 'wholesome' and 'crap' - yah, you can claim anything you want simply by adjusting the definitions.
    11. Re:Want bacteria with that? by Raenex · · Score: 1
      When you use fuzzy buzz words like 'wholesome' and 'crap' - yah, you can claim anything you want simply by adjusting the definitions.

      It's not FUD. It's a good summary of the contrast between typical processed food and typical unprocessed food. Why do you think there's all this banning of trans fat going on? Are you blind to the twin epidemics of diabetes and obesity? Have you not seen the reports that link chronic diseases to the modern, Western diet?

      We weren't evolved for a diet based on flour, sugar, and partially hydrogenated oil. Maybe in 200 years people will have adapted to this diet. There's going to be a lot of unnecessary suffering in the meantime. Do some googling. Here's a start: Effects of exercise and diet on chronic disease

    12. Re:Want bacteria with that? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1
      When you use fuzzy buzz words like 'wholesome' and 'crap' - yah, you can claim anything you want simply by adjusting the definitions.

      It's not FUD.

      Yes, it is FUD. And you just compound your error by piling on more buzzwords and throwing more FUD around.
       
       
      It's a good summary of the contrast between typical processed food and typical unprocessed food.

      This is where I end the conversation - you just keep piling the buzzwords and FUD and stereotypes on, believing it makes you seem informed.
       
      It doesn't. It makes you look like a raving idiot.
    13. Re:Want bacteria with that? by Raenex · · Score: 1
      This is where I end the conversation - you just keep piling the buzzwords and FUD and stereotypes on, believing it makes you seem informed.

      I see that you conveniently quoted the buzzword portion, and left out the rest, which gave real world evidence, like the banning of trans-fat, the epidemics of diabetes and obesity, and a link to a scientific study backing up my claims.

      It makes you look like a raving idiot.

      It makes you feel better to not have to change your view and label me as a raving idiot. How about you read the study? How about you look at the world around you and explain why kids are getting "adult" diabetes? How do you explain studies that show people who move to a Western diet get chronic diseases that they didn't get before?

  39. How do you think Yogurt is made? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Yogurt and cheese that aren't specifically meant for that purpose do not consistently contain large numbers of live bacteria

    Cheese, perhaps (some kinds anyway) but yogurt? Have you ever made yogurt from scratch? It's nothing BUT live bacteria and cultures!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  40. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by pryonic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Actually, has anyone seen my organic ?

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  41. In Soviet Russia by franksands · · Score: 1

    Probiotic Food alters you! uh, wait...

  42. I like my beer probiotic ... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    ... that is, with yeast in it and non-pasteurized.

    1. Re:I like my beer probiotic ... by disasm · · Score: 1

      I've noticed ever since I started brewing my own beer, I haven't been sick since, and when I wake up in the morning, I actually feel energized. It's probably just coincidence, but until I find otherwise, homebrew makes me healthier ;-)

      I'm curious how hard it is to get a hold of decent bacteria for making yogurt... It sounds like another interesting project to try to make from scratch.

      Sam

      --
      Long live Weizenstein!

  43. I don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I haven't seen a jogurt in the supermarket in recent memory that hasn't either got some preservative in it, or else is UHT'd beyond all recognition. Now, how on earth do they get a process to work on the "bad" bugs but not on the "good" ones???

  44. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by oojah · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure that it's the same advert I'm thinking of, but it's certainly something similar. Either way, it narks me off. One of the testimonials is "it's like a dessert". Well great, that tells me a lot.

    --
    Do you have any better hostages?
  45. popular in South Korea by gertuine · · Score: 1

    In South Korea you can find a score of various probiotic drinkable yogurt selections in any convenience store. They have ones focused on helping your colon, your stomach, on and on.. And they come in a variety of pleasing flavors (various fruits, cereal, etc). When I first got here, being an American, I thought it was quite fun and novel, but now I've gotten to thinking that Americans should be more interested in health in such a pervasive way.

    for my $0.02 worth, when I went to Europe, I liked the yogurt there by far more than any other kinds of yogurt I've tried (Tibetan yak yogurt included, because though it was tastey, it didn't outdo the European varieties)

  46. Organic in the US is definitely worth it by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I'd forgotten how fruit and vegetables were supposed to taste. The majority of the conventionally farmed stuff at the supermarkets here is decidedly mediocre, but organic food is worth it on taste alone - i eat so much more fruit now that it tastes like it's supposed to!

    1. Re:Organic in the US is definitely worth it by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You know, in side by side comparisons I'm rarely ever able to tell the difference between organic and regular fruits and vegetables. I've tried. Sometimes the organic ones taste better, sometimes the conventional ones do. Typically the difference isn't enough for the markup IMHO (with organic products costing on average 50-100% more).

      Worse, the Organic stocks appear to be refreshed more slowly than the conventional stocks (due to lower volume I guess), so they've often been sitting on the shelf for an extra day or two. Freshness makes a much bigger impact on flavor than the method it was grown. That's why it's generally preferable to buy produce from Farmers markets (although you have to be careful, many "farmers markets" are really just disguised grocery stores) where you know it hasn't been off of the ground for more than a day or two. Unfortunatly, this only works when you have farms nearby and stuff is in season, for the rest of the year you gotta stick with the grocery store offerings.

      The biggest advantage of the organic stocks is sometimes you get to the store a couple of days after the regular vegetable shipment, but on the day of the organic shipment, so you can get fresher stuff from the organic aisle.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Organic in the US is definitely worth it by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      I've never really bought from supermarkets but I can imagine that they don't get organic deliveries as frequently. We're lucky to have three (and soon four) competing organic supermarket chains in this area - now target and even walmart (on occassion) carry organic produce. Competition really drives down prices - i can now get a dozen organic cage free eggs for only 20c more than the grade A battery farmed ones.

      I get all my produce delivered from these guys

      http://denver.doortodoororganics.com/

      They tend to only deliver stuff that's in-season, but the quality is fantastic and it's opening my eyes to more vegetables that i'd never normally buy.

  47. Die early or eat yogurt by Mainusch · · Score: 1

    I'll take death, thank you.

    --
    Joe Mainusch http://www.weber-amps.com
    1. Re:Die early or eat yogurt by spiderbitendeath · · Score: 1

      Cake please

      --
      Sometimes when I'm working on projects things disappear, I suspect gremlins.
  48. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    Worst one I saw was 'high calcium water'. There was a craze for it a few years back.. I saw doting mothers literally walking out with shopping carts full of the stuff.

    The 'secret' ingredient? Calcium carbonate. Exactly the same stuff that's in tapwater in cities (that turns your kettle mungy).

    Except these numpties were paying £2 a bottle with about 100 bottles a week...

  49. NY Times = unreliable by SirLanse · · Score: 1

    Nice of you to pimp the NY Times. This is infotainment. It is Advertising for Dannon in the mask of a new article. Maybe someone would have comparisons of culture quality and variety in different products. Name products, give specifics, piss off advertisers.
    When NY Times gets is articles from a company website, it shows why they are going into the tank.

  50. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

    When I see organic milk I can't help thinking that the inorganic stuff would be a bit crunchy...

  51. Yogurt pirates? by sammy+baby · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thanks. Now I will be unable to think about anything but the phrase "yogurt pirates" for the rest of the day.

    "Yar, matey. Yo ho ho, and a packet of acidophilus."

  52. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative

    Perhaps you should shut your yapping and do some reading.

    The Soil Association.

    Organic standards are the rules and regulations that define how an organic product must be made. Organic standards are laid down in European Union (EU) law. Anything labelled 'organic' that is for human consumption must meet these standards as a minimum. The standards cover all aspects of food production, for example, animal welfare and wildlife conservation, and banning unnecessary and harmful food additives in organic processed foods.

    Organic farming and processing are legally defined. Any product sold as organic must comply with strict rules set at UK, European and international levels. These rules ensure that consumers can be certain that they are buying a genuine organic product. Imported organic foods must have been produced and inspected to equivalent standards. There must also be full traceabiliy of organic ingredients back to the farmer.

    There a number of different certification bodies in the UK, which carry out the inspections and paperwork to ensure that the standards are being met. Soil Association Certification Limited (SA Certification) is one of only a very few of these bodies that have chosen to set standards higher than the EU minimum in areas of animal welfare and nature conservation.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  53. Quackery by archeopterix · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here's a link to the AFFSA (the French FDA) report [PDF warning][French warning :-)] on the Lactobacillus Casei yoghurt. They found all of the manufacturer's claims "unverifiable" or "unsupported", except one, which they advised on changing to: "takes part in the process of reinforcing natural defenses".

  54. You call it Old Faithful by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    You call it 'Old Faithful' and tourists come to watch.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    1. Re:You call it Old Faithful by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I loved this paragraph in the article:

      As for Activia, the company does not claim that it reduces the risk of specific medical conditions like constipation. Rather, Dannon says, it "can help regulate your digestive system by helping reduce long intestinal transit time."

      I believe we used to refer to that as diarrhea. Activia should have a warning label: "Do not consume before long staff meetings! (Unless you're into that sort of thing.) And please, for the love of god, do not eat and fly. Thank You, The Other Passengers."

    2. Re:You call it Old Faithful by daeg · · Score: 2, Funny
      "Do not consume before long staff meetings!


      I see you've never been in a staff meeting that you need a strategic escape from. Once others catch on to you that you're having your mother call you precisely 30 minutes into every single meeting, you need to find another escape plan. It's easy to hide yogurt; it's not easy to hide Taco Bell, particularly if you work with any stoners.

      I see a very large market that Activia can tap into. The trapped business professional!
    3. Re:You call it Old Faithful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't you just *pretend* to need to use the restroom rather than risking extreme gastric discomfort?

  55. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1
    Of course most of them described some kind of improvement in their wellbeing
    I'd love to see the original footage. At a wild guess they asked 20, 3 had a placebo reaction and said the right thing for the cameras. The others either noticed no change or complained their arse was doing wierd things.
    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  56. Didn't Mention My Favourite Probiotic Food! by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The article didn't mention my favourite probiotic food: real ale. Yup, real, unfiltered, unpasteurised beer contains millions of little tiny living yeast cells. Granted, I don't think that brewer's yeast has any really beneficial effect (the B12 they contain is almost certainly not bioavailable to man), but still, that's pretty cool.

    Another common probiotic is cheese. Yup, cheese is made by adding bacteria to milk to sour it, then adding rennet to curdle the soured milk, then straining, pressing & aging the curds. An unpasteurised cheese will contain lots of lactobacilli (and if a blue cheese, penicillium), as well as the other strains responsible for the particular cheese's distinctive flavour.

    And then there's keffir, a drink made by fermenting milk. You can buy it in the store these days, where it tastes something like runny yoghurt.

    Still, the best use of microbes in food has got to be beer. As the wise man said, beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.

    1. Re:Didn't Mention My Favourite Probiotic Food! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good ol' ben franklin

  57. helpful bacteria by Intangion · · Score: 1

    certain bacterias are helpful lactobacteria (acidophilus? something like that) are good for your digestion, normally you get it as a baby from mother milf and a culter of bacteria lives in your colon most of your life, but anti-biotics kill it and cause iregularity

    eating yogurt with lactobacteria can help restore it

    i thought this article was going to be about the bacteria eating viruses that they are using to treat foods now.. thats right viruses in our food on purpose. and the only way they can breed enough of these viruses to use is by breeding them on the very harmful bacteria that they are supposed to treat! the fda admits a small number of the treated foods will have the more of the harmful bacteria on them than you would otherwise be exposed to without any of their tampering...

    so we are being given viruses and bacteria for .. what??!!!

    1. Re:helpful bacteria by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you get it as a baby from mother milf

      Mother milf ? Gracious ! Oedipus indeedly

  58. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by estarriol · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Eh? It's not marketing bullshit at all. The Organic Foods certifications are strict and hard to get - if there's so much demand for organic, why do you think the scale of production hasn't reached saturation level yet? It's because it can take years for a farm or other producer to get organic certification after they stop using inorganic fertilisers, pesticides etc. It's punishingly hard and mostly it's the producers that have always been organic that are providing for now. Expect organic food to come down in price steadily, and please read more about the subject!

  59. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by pryonic · · Score: 1
    Erm...

    Did I say they weren't regulated? No. I know the rules and regulations and I know they're enforced. You know what? So is regular farming! You can't use DTT in the EU anymore for example, that's a farming regulation!

    However, organic farming does allow chemicals and pesticides to be used, it's just a subset of what is used for other farming. Some of them are quite nasty but people assume an organic potato will have been dug by a friendly local farmer using no chemicals and picked by hand. It's a marketing fad, trust me. If you're that bothered, grow your own apples, I can't fault that.

    Even the Farmer's Union agrees

    In summary I'm not sayign that organic foods don't meet the standards, I'm saying the standards aren't very stringent in the first place. You've done nothing to change my mind that it's just a buzzword. To be honest I think we'd all be better off eating locally grown produce that isn't covered in chemicals but I don't think it's gonna happen any time soon.

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  60. Nice advertising! by cursorx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know if Dannon paid the NYT, but it sure does feel like it. Anyway, the Activia line is great, but as many posters have pointed out above hardly anything new, and by far not my favorite probiotic product (Yakult, forever). But it's a shame that from looking at the US site, they're not commercializing the best Activia flavor currently marketed in Brazil, oatmeal. Who cares about strawberry, peach and other regular yogurt flavors? I can get better tasting strawberry yogurt from other brands...that's much harder when it comes to oatmeal yogurt.

  61. Back to 1990 by Fulkkari · · Score: 1

    These kinds of products have been in Finland since 1990. I'm a bit surprised this is something new in the US. But on the other hand, I believe Finland is one of the leading countries in dairy products... if you don't count cheese.

    --
    I demand the Cone of Silence!
    1. Re:Back to 1990 by Lars+Clausen · · Score: 1

      Acidophilus has been on the Danish market since 1938 (the main brand being called A-38 for the bacterium and the year of introduction). It's good stuff, too.

  62. we used bacteria to preserve food for generations by nido · · Score: 4, Informative
    Sterile food is a 20th century historical curiosity, and look at how chronic disease has taken off. Antibiotics may have diminished the danger of a bacterial infections, but new health syndromes have risen with a vengeance (cancer, heart disease, IBS, tooth decay, etc).

    Lots of traditional foods were fermented. Nourishing Traditions (best cookbook evar!) has a couple chapters on using lacto-bacteria to predigest and preserve foods - cultured dairy products, fermented fruits & vegetables (chutney, Sauerkraut, pickled vegetables, etc), lacto-fermented beverages (made some "grape cooler" last fall - Mmmm.... ), etc.

    It may seem strange to us that, in earlier times, people knew how to preserve vegetables for long periods without the use of freezers or canning machines. This was done through the process of lacto-fermentation. Lactic acid is a natural preservative that inhibits putrefying bacteria. Starches and sugars in vegetables and fruits are converted into lactic acid by the many species of lactic-acid-producing bacteria. These lactobacilli are ubiquitous, present on the surface of all living things and especially numerous on leaves and roots of plants growing in or near the ground. Man needs only to learn the techniques for controlling and encouraging their proliferation to put them to his own use, just as he has learned to put certain yeasts to use in converting the sugars in grape juice to alcohol in wine.

    The ancient Greeks understood that important chemical changes took place during this type of fermentation. Their name for this change was "alchemy." Like the fermentation of dairy products, preservation of vegetables and fruits by the process of lacto-fermentation has numerous advantages beyond those of simple preservation. The proliferation of lactobacilli in fermented vegetables enhances their digestibility and increases vitamin levels.These beneficial organisms produce numerous helpful enzymes as well as antibiotic and anticarcinogenic substances. Their main by-product, lactic acid, not only keeps vegetables and fruits in a state of perfect preservation but also promotes the growth of healthy flora throughout the intestine. Other alchemical by-products include hydrogen peroxide and small amounts of benzoic acid.

    -Nourishing Traditions, pg. 89


    One insight that I think is particularly useful is how the book says that grains/nuts/beans/legumes should be soaked in water (depending on what's being soaked, with salt/whey/lemon juice) to de-activate enzyme-inhibitors. This makes said grains/nuts/beans/legumes easier to digest, which might be important for you Irritable Bowel Syndrome sufferers... If I'm making pancakes, I take my freshly ground whole wheat flour and mix in the raw milk and a little probiotics the night before. Leave it out on the counter overnight, and by morning all those nasty enzyme inhibitors have broken down.

    Sample chapters at the page linked above. Check it out. More info if desired...
    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  63. Re:we used bacteria to preserve food for generatio by Cheeze · · Score: 1

    Tooth decay?

    I will disagree with that. The reason it wasn't a problem 100 years ago is the average lifespan was short enough that the person died before all of their teeth went bad. There is a distinct change around the 50s where flouride started getting put in water and the incidence of tooth decay dropped dramatically.

    Go to a 3rd world country where they don't have dental care and you will see toothless masses.

    --
    Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  64. I, for one by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    welcome our new Probiotic overlords!

    In Soviet Russia, your food eats YOU!

    Oh won't someone please think of the bacteria???

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of probiotic bacteria!!!

    You know, someone oughtta make a webpage chronicling all of these little slashdot-isms...

    1. Re:I, for one by UltimApe · · Score: 1

      I lol'd.

      As a side note, after a night of heavy drinking, its a good idea to have some quality yogurt, as your vodka has killed off most of the probiomes.

      --
      "Infecting minds with my own memetic virus, one post at a time." Ultimape
  65. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by mgblst · · Score: 1

    Insurance adds, and Loan assitance adds get to me, but what really annoy me are the adverts where they pretend that they are actually interviewing someone, when it is all just actors reading from a script. I know people fall for this stuff all the time, but it is so obvious and annoying. The one on UK tv I really hate is the people applying for home loans "really, i will save how much, that is amazing" - yeah, thanks for that.

  66. Obligatory by Coucho · · Score: 0

    don't eat the hollandaise sauce. Raw egg yolks lying around = bad stuff. 1. Go out to restaurant
    2. Contract samonella poisoning
    3. Sue restaurant
    4. ?????
    5. Profit!
    --
    *pSig = NULL;
  67. Cheese by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's funny that you would mention cheese, since the cheese that most Americans and Canadians are familiar with is Cheddar -- the one and only cheese (to my knowledge) that is NOT pasteurized here. Probably why it's so popular.

    Frankly, I'm surprised European cheese producers have never launched a WTO grievance over our bizarre pasteurization laws, which mostly just keep European cheeses out of our markets. Research has shown that pasteurizing cheese increases the chances of a pathogenic strain of bacteria taking hold, since there will be no competing bacteria to inhibit the pathogen's development should one take hold.

    I'd comment on the cigars too, but I'm not American so it wouldn't really mean anything. At the job I do to pay for school, I sell several cuban cigarillos a day (and usually at least one pack of American cigars). Ironically the cubans that we have are of very low quality, so the Americans sell rather better -- entire packs at a time rather than singles. Funny how these things work out.

    1. Re:Cheese by altek · · Score: 2, Funny

      And not a single one of them gets smoked without first emptying the contents and refilling it with a different substance ;)

      --
      THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
    2. Re:Cheese by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's funny that you would mention cheese, since the cheese that most Americans and Canadians are familiar with is Cheddar -- the one and only cheese (to my knowledge) that is NOT pasteurized here.


      I would bet that the "cheese" most Americans are familiar with is American cheese (or the even viler Velveeta-style 'Pasteurized Processed American Cheese Food'.

      But Cheddar is certainly not the only kind of nonpasteurized cheese available in America.
    3. Re:Cheese by ldholtsclaw · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the packages sitting in the middle of the aisle on a pallet labeled "Pasteurized Process Imitation Artificial Cheese Food." It looks like yellow plastic but I never felt suicidal enough to check the taste.

      I stopped a few people from picking up any but the store management's arrival prompted a hasty return to my shopping. Still, it amazes me that it wasn't even real "Cheese Food" (which in itself doesn't bear much in common with actual Cheese).

    4. Re:Cheese by araemo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that stuff is Low Fat Velveeta. ;)

    5. Re:Cheese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in the US, we call those "Blunts". And remember kiddies...roll em tight...roll em thick...roll em FRESH!

  68. patents on life. by kneel · · Score: 4, Informative
    I tried the Activa yogurt and it didn't do anything to my digestive tract that regular yogurt doesn't already help with (I get the IBS pretty often).


    I think the 'bifidus digestivus' and 'bifidus regularus' bacteria are a bunch of marketing bullshit. As noted by previous posters, they basically took some Bulgarian bacteria, renamed and trademarked it, and marketed it.


    I do believe in the benefits of probiotics, although I think they are pretty low unless your body is under specific conditions that might kill all or most of the flora in your intestine. Like if you took antibiotics. Intestinal bacteria are very important, and you gotta replace it somehow if it dies off. In fact, some doctors are seriously suggesting that shit is an organ, just like your lungs and heart and whatnot. They think it is necessary for human life and if your intestinal flora is damaged, in some cases they are seriously suggesting poop transplants. Seriously, some doctors are cramming other peopless shit into their patient's colons.


    So I did some poking around and i found that the Stonyfield Organic Yogurt is the best. It has 1-3 grams of fiber (depending on the flavor) in the form of inulin, which helps your body ingest the calcium. It also has 6 live cultures, which is the most of any yogurt I've seen. Combine that with the fact that it is organic, so won't be filled with hormones and (ironically) antibiotics, and a great taste (particularly the chocolate) and its a damn healthy snack.

    --

    indierock / punkrock band photos and more... http://www.digitaldefection.net

    1. Re:patents on life. by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

      It's amazing that you can patent something that you didn't invent or create. I think the names were created so that people would more easily associte 'digestivus' and 'regularus' with their product's claimed benefits. THAT is a marketing ploy that should be illegal. You should not be able to rename a life form just to make it sound more holistically appealing for product sale, as the renaming of the not so chic-trendy name 'Bifidobacterium animalis' which is the REAL name on the bacteria. If you look at all the other names and trade names for Bifidobacterium animalis, they are all geared toward generating sales. Activo, Digestivum, Essenis, Regularis, everything BUT the real name of the bacteria.

      Someone should call them on this.

      --
      Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    2. Re:patents on life. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Seriously, some doctors are cramming other peopless shit into their patient's colons.

      Er.. these "doctors" wouldn't happen to =be members of Faith No More would they ?

    3. Re:patents on life. by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      Seriously, some doctors are cramming other peopless shit into their patient's colons.

      I read recently that scientists are now coming around to the idea that we all go through a "poop transplant" before we are born--taking in bacteria from our mother's digestive tracts and vaginal areas for our own digestive system. Poop transplants seem to the logical extension...

      "Another area of research is the process by which these helpful bacteria first colonise the digestive tract. Babies acquire their gut flora as they pass down the birth canal and take a gene-filled gulp of their mother's vaginal and faecal flora. It might not be the most delicious of first meals, but it could well be an important one."

      From "Hard to digest", The Economist, June 2, 2006

  69. Common by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Everything, and I mean everything, that you put into your mouth, is crawling with bacteria and fungal spores. Bacteria are far less harmful than people think. The fact that the bacteria is new and strange is a BENEFIT, because it means that the bacteria isn't adapted to living in the Human body. The more foreign a bacteria is, the less dangerous it is to be exposed to it.

    The dangerous bacteria are ones that live in people (or other mammals) already. when you get exposed to these bacteria, they have the upper hand because they're already adapted to living in the mammalian colon, but your immune system hasn't adapted to keep that bacteria under control. And the bacteria may not be perfectly adapted to your system, so it may over-produce itself or its byproducts, making you sick -- something that your own native flora usually don't do.

    1. Re:Common by itlurksbeneath · · Score: 1

      Good point. And whilst on the subject of bacteria, people that go to the store and seek out live culture yogurt will recoil in terror if you mention radiated food to them. What's the problem, people. Hell, the safe handling practices of raw chicken is somewhere between Biosafety Level 2 and Biosafety Level 3 procedures. Still, people are more afraid of things they don't understand (i.e. radiation) and will gladly play Russian roulette with things they barely understand (bacteria, fungus, virii, etc).

      Radiate the food, people. Save yourself a few days per year leaning over the toilet.

      But don't radiate my live culture yogurt. That's the POINT of the LIVE part...

      --
      Have you ever considered piracy? You'd make a wonderful Dread Pirate Roberts.
    2. Re:Common by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Most good dog and cat foods have had plenty of probiotics added to them for years now. It's nothing new. We sell a lot of probiotics to people to give their pets after they've had a round of antibiotics. That's why antibiotics upset your stomach when you take them... they often kill the good bacteria in your gut that help with digestion.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  70. Re:we used bacteria to preserve food for generatio by edremy · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Sterile food is a 20th century historical curiosity, and look at how chronic disease has taken off. Antibiotics may have diminished the danger of a bacterial infections, but new health syndromes have risen with a vengeance (cancer, heart disease, IBS, tooth decay, etc).

    I think you're mixing up correlation and causation there. Yes, chronic disease has taken off- because the *acute* diseases that used to kill us don't anymore. I think we forget just how bad life used to be for most people.

    Cancer and heart disease used to kill people too- the people who weren't killed by smallpox, TB, random bacterial infections and a host of other lethal diseases that we don't get anymore, not to mention the tons of people who didn't even make it out of childbirth, mother and child alike. It wasn't even that long ago- my grandmother-in-law grew up on a farm, had no prenatal care at all and managed only two grown children out of four- the other two died within days of birth. The average human lifespan in 1900 in the US was well under 50- most 40 year olds don't die of cancer/heart attacks today, and most didn't then either.

    And I have to call you on tooth decay. That's *always* existed- ask George Washington (if you could) about that. He probably would have decked you- it made him miserable for his entire life. Most people without modern medical care have utterly horrible teeth by age 40. Meanwhile, I have to haul my 41-year-old butt into the dentist for a crown on a cracked tooth tomorrow- it should last the rest of my life.

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  71. REALLY moving in your food by Trumpetgod2k1 · · Score: 0

    What about worm cheese? Movement supplied courtesy of the Piophila casei larva!

  72. Re:living 'brew' has been available for 2000+ year by overlordmead · · Score: 1

    Amen brother!

    Fixed my gastro problems(Acid reflux, pre-ulcer conditions) faster than anything. Try making your tea with oolong! superior results!

    --
    Think Gnole-ish, not prole-ish
  73. Am I alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    .. in thinking that Activia tastes like medicine?

  74. "The truth about food" BBC programme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The above BBC programme, on last week, had a small scale trial of probiotic yoghurt v probiotic foods(onions, leeks, garlic and globe artichokes). The yoghurt increased the good bacteria in the subjects guts slightly, the foods by a lot more. Save your money, eat more bacteria friendly foods.

  75. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    Using the words of a government minister with a degree in Economics & Politicals and the NFU isn't going to cut much ice with me I'm afraid.

    My home grown apples are rather tasty.

    As is the veg I buy from my local growers co-operative.

    Organic food outside of supermarkets is not as expensive is you claim.

    You can even have it delivered.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  76. Of course your food is moving by thewils · · Score: 1

    Especially if it is Odori!!

    Mmmmmmm, fresh!

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
  77. Truthiness! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Our food is full of truthiness! God bless the USA.

  78. Bio-K+ > Activia by wuie · · Score: 1

    If you ever need to repopulate your colon's bacteria content, you should reach for Bio-K+ before you reach for most yogurts. It's a live probiotic product w/ at least 50 billion cells of friendly bacteria per container. This stuff works wonders after using antibiotics or while fighting off a Candida infection.

  79. Prehistoric news by flibuste · · Score: 1

    All yogourts contain bacterias. That's how they become yogourts. Otherwise they stay milky splashy things. Danone has been selling all kind of mixtures of various "active" ingredients (usually called bacterias...) in their yogourts. As the FA points out, it's been around in Europe for decades. They're even coming up with a yogourt that "refreshes" your skin (pink wrapping 'cause it's a girly thing to want to have a fresh skin apparently).

    What's in the FA is OLD news. Oh..and there's a drawback to it: you need to eat them regularly for months, otherwise they're just plain yogourts with no specific effect.

  80. WIC, govt. subsidies, crack babies, dead cow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    farmers will all suffer.

    The traditional underground hippie approach has been to swap cash to crack whores for their 25kg WIC sacks of powdered milk, make yogurt in discarded chemical drums parked over steam vents for 24 hours, pack it into empty school lunch program milk containers with Mr. Natural keep on fucking labels, and swap it to health food co-ops for iboga and yoqona root which is sold via the internet to 'inner truth' seeking euro-trash /.ers as an aid in formulating clever GWB sux posts.

    Commercialization of the product and trademarking the 'crap aid' street name in order to push more milk product on obese suburban housewives who will employ time saved worshipping the porcelein ass pig in pursuit of stimulation via their ADD ridden four eyed bedwetting future /.er male childs remote controlled vibrating atomic submarines will result in...

    well you /.ers can handle the apocalyptic ramifications of the above scenario

  81. teeth can last a lifetime by nido · · Score: 0
    Teeth last a lifetime if they're properly cared for. Modern toothpastes are not the proper way to take care of the teeth - Dr. Judd says to brush with bar soap, so that the enamel can be properly remineralized. I follow the bar soap with a mixture of baking soda and salt. Acids dissolve tooth enamel; well-nourished humans have saliva that is slightly alkaline, so that the enamel is continuously re-formed. Dr. Judd doesn't have anything nice to say about fluoride either.

    Weston A. Price, DDS, was a dentist in the early 20th century. He was alarmed at the increase in the number of cavities he saw in his patients, so one day he closed up shop and started traveling the world.

    If I may be so bold as to summarize his findings in a couple sentances, Dr. Price found near-perfect teeth wherever a group of people were eating their traditional diets, whatever that diet might have been composed of. Modern food (refined flour, refined sugar, canned food, etc) was strongly correlated with tooth decay, poor bone structure (narrow faces, compressed dental arches, etc), and general poor health.

    In the summer of 1933, [we made] contact with large bands of Indians who had come out of the Pelly mountain country to exchange their furs at the last outpost of the Hudson Bay Company...they have remained as nomadic wandering tribes following the moose and caribou herds in the necessary search to obtain foods.

    The rigorous winters reach seventy degrees below zero. This precludes the possibility of maintaining dairy animals or growing seed cereals or fruits. The diet of these indians is almost entirely limited to the wild animals of the chase. This made a study of them exceedingly important. The wisdom of these people regarding Nature's laws and their skill in adapting themselves to the rigorous climate and very limited variety of foods, and these often very hard to obtain, have developed a skill in the art of living comfortably with rugged Nature that has been approached by few other tribes in the world. The sense of honor among these tribes is so strong that practically all cabins, temporarily unoccupied due to the absence of the Indians on their hunting trip, were entirely unprotected by locks; and the valuables belonging to the Indians were left in plain sight...

    The condition of the teeth, and the shape of the dental arches and the facial form, were superb. Indeed, in several groups examined not a single tooth was found that had ever been attacked by tooth decay.... Careful inquiry regarding the presence of arthritis was made in the more isolated groups. We neithersaw nor heard of a case in the isolated groups. However, at the point of contact with the foods of modern civilization many cases were found including ten bed-ridden cripples in a series of about twenty Indian homes. Some other affections made their appearance here, particularly tuberculosis which was taking a very severe toll fo the children who ahd been born at this center.... The suffering from tooth decay was tragic. There were no dentists, no doctors available within hundreds of miles to relieve suffering.

    The physiques of the Indians of the far north who are still living in their isolated locations and in accordance with their accumulated wisdom were superb. There were practically no irregular teeth including no impacted thrid molars, as evidenced by the fac tthat all individuals old enough to have the molars erupted had them standing in position and functioning normally for mastication.... Where the indians were using the white man's food tooth decay was very severe.... In the new generation, after meeting the white civilization and using his foods, many developed crooked teeth, so called, with deformed dental arches.

    Weston Price, DDS /Nutrition and Physical Degeneration/

    -from Nourishing Traditions, pg 320-321

    Every recipe page in this 'cookbook' has quotes such as this. (Each of the sections in the book is set up as in the sample chapters on the previously linked website.)
    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  82. Oh you bastard... by aztektum · · Score: 1

    All was good until you evoke Ol' Faithful and I think of Tubgirl. Burn in hell!

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  83. Re:we used bacteria to preserve food for generatio by nido · · Score: 1
    I think we forget just how bad life used to be for most people.

    I think you're generalizing the European slum experience across all of humanity, and I Don't think that's accurate or fair. Weston A. Price traveled the world at the start of the modern age, and found that people who lived a traditional lifestyle had marvelous health, and people who ate "modern" foods were sickly and had lots of cavities. I don't care to speculate as to why George Washington lost his teeth.

    In their native state the natives of the Torres Strait Islands have exceedingly little disease. Dr. J. R. Nimmo, the government physician in charge of the supervision of this group, told me in his thirteen years with them he had not seen a single case of malignancy, and had seen only one that he had suspected might be malignancy among the entire four thousand native population. He stated that during this same period he had operated on several dozen malignancies for the white population, which numbers about three hundred. He reported that among the primitive stock other affections requiring surgical interference were rare. The environment of the Torres Strait Islanders provided a very liberal supply of sea foods and fertile islands on which an adequate quantity of tropical plants are readily grown. Toro, bananas, papaya, and plums are all grown abundantly. The sea foods include large and small fish in great abundance, dugong and a great variety of shellfish. These foods have developed for them remarkable physiques with practically complete immunity to dental caries. Wherever they have adopted the white man's foods, however, the suffer the typical expressions of degeneration, such as loss of immunity to dental caries; and in the succeeding generations there is a marked change in facial and dental arch form with marked lowering of resistance to disease.

    Weston Price, DDS /Nutrition and Physical Degeneration/
    -Nourishing Traditions, pg 204 (emphasis added)

    I also refer you to my reply to the other post on tooth decay. My grandfather's teeth are currently rotting out, and if you stick to the conventional route I expect this'll happen to you too. Dr. Judd (link in that post) mentions that 42% of americans over 65 have NO natural teeth (#16).

    All I'm offering is some better information - the choice to keep your teeth is up to you. :)
    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
  84. Reminds me of a story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a meeting, I felt that, well, pre-diarrhea feeling. I got up to make a quick exit.
    As I moved towards the doorway, one of the managers, lets call him GEORGE, took hold
    of my arm. Now GEORGE was the type of guy who liked to grab you by the arm while
    he was talking to someone else, so you wouldn't leave (since you were next in line to be
    asked some innane question).

    However, in this case, GEORGE had made a crucial mistake. You see ahead of the large
    mass of foaming, putrid, fecal shrapnel that was pressing down on my final valve was
    a very large gas bubble. As much as the muscles of my colon were able to hold back
    the floodgates, my will was no match for the gas bubble. GEORGE made the unfortunate
    mistake of inhaling just as my rear end released its toxic rattle. His grip released
    immediately as I left the room barely containing my laughter.

    Insanity was the likely diagnosis of my fellow bathroom inhabitants as moments later
    I relieved myself while howling with laughter.

    1. Re:Reminds me of a story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      okay for an amateur. it could use more than a bit of work.
      good use of adjectives.

      you overuse words too often, usually immediately following the first use, since they're fresh in your mind. this demonstrates a poor vocabulary.

      for example:

      "However, in this case, GEORGE had made a crucial mistake."
      " GEORGE made the unfortunate mistake"

      "just as my rear end released its toxic rattle"
      "His grip released immediately "

      "I left the room barely containing my laughter"
      "I relieved myself while howling with laughter."

      and so on and so forth (I left out 'gas bubble').
      you also used an alternate form of 'release' on the last part. I believe it was overdone.

      here is one way you could rewrite this:

      In a meeting, I felt that, well, pre-diarrhea feeling. I got up to make a quick exit.
      As I moved toward the doorway, one of the managers (let's call him GEORGE) took hold
      of my arm. Now, GEORGE was the type of guy who liked to grab you by the arm, while
      he was talking to someone else, so that you wouldn't leave (since you were next in line to be
      asked some random, inane question).

      However, in this case, GEORGE had made a crucial mistake. Ahead of the large
      mass of foaming, putrid smelling fecal shrapnel, which was pressing down on my final valve, there
      was a very large gas bubble. As strong as I was, my muscles could not contain the disgusting
      mass.

      GEORGE inhaled just as my rear end released its toxic rattle. His grip softened
      immediately, and I left the room, barely suppressing my laughter.

      Insanity was the likely diagnosis from fellow bathroom inhabitants, as moments later
      I exploded a gigantic fury of shit water tonic, plastering the walls of the bathroom with the most
      foul smelling chocolate dessert a kid has ever set eyes upon.

      I had to wonder how many of my co-workers would think the repugnant brown filth was only a test run
      of our company's new edible wallpaper.
      I couldn't resist imagining the fat faced white trash nigger loving sloppy munge hairy arm pit sluts I hated so much furiously mopping up
      the most vile turd cake excrement I'd ever expelled.

      I resigned myself back to the meeting, howling with amusement.

  85. The classic has already said... by UncleOwl · · Score: 1

    There's something weird in the fridge today
    I don't know what it is
    Food I can't recognize
    My roommate won't throw a thing away
    I guess it's probably his
    It looks like it's alive...

    And livin' in the fridge... livin' in the fridge
    Livin' in the fridge... livin' in the fridge

    --- Livin' In The Fridge, by Weird Al Yankovic

    (sorry, couldn't resist...)

  86. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by MCraigW · · Score: 1

    Probiotic spinach and scallions! They're fat free too!!

  87. Something in Your Food is Moving by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't eat this, it is still paddling...

  88. Oral administration is unreliable by Fnordulicious · · Score: 1

    There is a major problem with probiotics. The primary concentration of bacteria and fungi in the gut is in the large intestine, the colon. The small intestine is relatively alkaline, and the stomach is famous for its acidity. Neither area is a hospitable environment for most bacteria, particularly those known for a symbiotic or commensal relationship with humans in the gut. Therefore, administering probiotics orally is unreliable unless they are properly encapsulated to survive passage through the stomach and small intestine. I imagine that those found in e.g. yogurt are not so encapsulated, meaning that the majority are destroyed upon reaching the stomach.

    As with other substances such as the vitamin B complex, is possible to administer enough to ensure that some percentage survives the passage through the upper gut to the large intestine, but I don't see how commercial food additives are likely to provide enough mass action for this to occur.

    In summary, if you really want to actively change your gut flora and fauna, the best method is through enemas.

  89. real yogurt can also be bought at supermarket by pikine · · Score: 2, Informative

    You are right that most yogurt packaged in a small cup with fruit flavors are diluted. However, supermarkets also carry "plain" yogurt in a pint sized container. It's mostly solid, have strong odor, and is very sour.

    --
    I once had a signature.
  90. Mod parent up, plus... by Tz-Auber · · Score: 1
    This is about the sum of it, we've been sterilizing like crazy during the 20th century due to the fact we started shipping foods long distances. Now with the advent of refridgeration, stainless steel containers and other clean (not sterilizing) technologies, we really don't have to do about 75% of the sterilization techniques we use to basically 'kill' food.

    I'm a big fan of raw (goat usually) milk in particular, tons of probiotics, enzymes, nutrients, etc... From a clean, well-regulated, preferebly low-density dairy, this stuff probably beats Activa 20 times over and is likely that much cheaper. Also for the paranoid folks worried about infection, etc.. some of the success stories describe state-regulated raw milk samples as being lower in pathogenic count than pasteurized samples. (too lazy to dig up reference, see link below for more info)

    Check out http://www.realmilk.com/ for a rundown on raw unpasteurized milk for yourself. Cheers!

  91. Re:we used bacteria to preserve food for generatio by Dirtside · · Score: 1
    The average human lifespan in 1900 in the US was well under 50


    Yeah, but the distribution was extremely different -- infant and child mortality was extremely high (compared to today), but if you made it past childhood, you had a pretty good chance of living to a ripe old age. For those who made it past age 5 or 6, the average lifespan was more like 70+.
    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  92. When you're tasting yogurt, it's tasting you! by SimHacker · · Score: 1

    It's not that "you are what you eat". It's that "you are what you don't shit".

    -Wavy Gravy

    --
    Take a look and feel free: http://www.PieMenu.com
  93. US/UK difference by ThreeDayMonk · · Score: 1

    People are "healthy." Food is "healthful."

    Interestingly, that distinction doesn't hold in British English, where both people and foods can be 'healthy', and 'healthful' is never used.

    --
    If your comment title says 'Re: Foo', I'm not likely to read it.
    1. Re:US/UK difference by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, that distinction doesn't hold in the US either, unless the speaker wants to sound like a pompous ass.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  94. Over priced? Make your own. by not-enough-info · · Score: 1

    step 1) Buy "real" yogurt and milk at supermarket.
    step 2) Go home, dump yogurt into milk, place in fridge.
    step 3) Wait a few weeks.

    It really doesn't take that long, and once you have your first supply, you can make more just by adding milk.

    --
    ---k--
    </stupid>
  95. You're wrong by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1

    A good majority of yogurts sold in regular grocery stores (e.g. Safeway, Publix, Kroger, etc.) are "real" with active culture in them. Perhaps the Yoplait brand is not, but in my experience, most of the other major brands are *real* yogurts. Now, they may not contain as fresh ingredients or have their milk sourced from organic grass-eating cows as you might find in smaller specialty shops, but that doesn't mean they aren't real.

  96. Oblig. Simpsons reference by jez9999 · · Score: 1

    Krusty: Kids, today we have to talk about Krusty Brand Chew-
            Goo Gum-like Substance. We knew it contained spider
            eggs, but the Hantavirus, well, that really came out
            of left field. [At home, Bart blows a bubble. When
            it pops, dozens of tiny spiders run off] So, if any
            of you've experienced numbness, or comas, send proof
            of purchase and five dollars to: Antidote, PO Box
            14 --
  97. Re:we used bacteria to preserve food for generatio by edremy · · Score: 1
    I think you're generalizing the European slum experience across all of humanity, and I Don't think that's accurate or fair. Weston A. Price traveled the world at the start of the modern age, and found that people who lived a traditional lifestyle had marvelous health, and people who ate "modern" foods were sickly and had lots of cavities.

    Don't forget the other problems. Currently living hunter-gatherer tribes do not generally have long life expectancies, good diet or no. High infant (and maternal) mortality and early deaths due to disease or accident are common. Those folks that do make it to an advanced age are generally far more decrepid than a Westerner, provided the westerner took care of their health. And of course, a "traditional" diet isn't going to support 7 billion people- hunter-gathers need large amounts of space since it's basically a requirement to live in small groups and constantly migrate away from the bad sanitation and parasites that otherwise would kill you. (To be fair, it's not clear if modern methods can keep up 7 billion people either.)

    All I'm offering is some better information - the choice to keep your teeth is up to you. :)

    I think a little more research might indicate that the "White man's diet" has affected teeth since the dawn of agriculture. Yes, carbohydrates (sugars) affect teeth- that's well known. But it's been that way since the beginning of civilization, otherwise we wouldn't be finding 9000 year old dentist drills, or million-year-old skulls with dental decay. It's not just white men either- you can trace the rise in dental problems for New World natives on the increased use of maize.

    Looking back to my (and my wife's) ancestors over the past 200 years, I'm doing just fine even if I need some dental work. I have lost 8 teeth, but that was by design since my jaw was too small for them all. I didn't die in childbirth like some of them, I didn't die at age 25 from the flu, smallpox or other malady (or for that matter, from stupid doctors like one distant relative), I still have all my digits unlike say, my grandpa who lost some in an accident. I've survived an infection that probably would have cost me my leg 100 years ago and might well have killed me.

    I'll take the tradeoff

    --
    "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  98. Are you eating it.... or is it eating you? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    This Activia reminds me of The Stuff.

  99. prebiotic vegetables are better says the BBC by pbhj · · Score: 1

    A recent BBC program showed that eating prebiotic veg was better than having probiotic yoghurt stuff.

    See
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/humanbody/truthaboutfood/h ealthy/prebiotics.shtml - main program details
    http://www.food.rdg.ac.uk/news#104 - titbit about the PhD researcher used

    I think this is because the stomach environment kills the probiotic bacteria and so generating a better environment for your endemic gut bacteria is better - prebiotic vegetables will do this for you.

  100. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well your average supermarket milk is about 88% inorganic compounds, and it isn't usually too crunchy. 100% inorganic milk might be a little tasteless (though some of it is a little salty) but it could be just as soft and drinkable.

  101. Re: IBS and coffee by Random+Walk · · Score: 1
    Coffee is harmless. as long as it's roasted properly (i.e. gently). However, all major brand coffee, whatever their ads say, is roasted the cheap way (fast and hot), resulting in poor taste and bitter remainders that may cause health problems in the long run. I switched to coffee from a very small local roastery some time ago - it's four times more expensive than major brands, but tastes much better, and the occasional stomach ache has disappeared.

    Of course this is in Germany; according to my own experience, you'll have a hard time finding good coffee in the US.

  102. Pop a pill. by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    You can get Acidophilus in pill form at any health foods store. In fact, you can probably get it in any grocery store.

    The pills have way more bacteria in them, are stable at room temperature (read: more convenient than yogurt), and are a lot cheaper than yogurt, if you're only eating yogurt for the bacteria.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  103. Practicing physician by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1
    As a practicing physician you should know better.
    I don't trivialize The Mohel's practice of medicine--Mohels are extremely skilled in what they do (watch the difference between an experienced Mohel and an experienced surgeon in a hospital doing the same procedure to see what I mean)--but if you don't know what a Mohel is, you should look it up. Then decide for yourself if you want to take this physician's advice on nutrition.

    Again, I'm sure he's a top notch surgeon, but nutrition is a bit outside of his area of medicine.
    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  104. Re: IBS and coffee by rs79 · · Score: 1

    "you'll have a hard time finding good coffee in the US."

    There's a German lady on eBay - Uta - that sells home roasted fair trade organic coffee that is utterly to die for.

    --
    Need Mercedes parts ?
  105. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

    I've learnt a few things from watching these adverts on UK telly.

    1) Insurance companies will give you a great quote, even if the only information you provide to them is "It's a hatchback"

    2) People who are in debt just want a loan to buy bloody crazy things. There's one with a guy who's broke and trying to mow his garden with a manual mower. He gets a loan, buys a conservatory and a ride-on mower. Based on this spending, I'd say his next purchase was a chocolate teapot full of vodka for him to drink as debt collectors come to take his house away a month later.

    3) If I have any kind of accident, someone must give me money!

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005
  106. Re:Let's not make this a "craze" for marketing's s by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

    Heh heh, I know that advert. I know that's the line that always swings it for me.

    "Afternoon, I'm a medical doctor and I'm wondering if there's any evidence that this product actually contains appreciable levels of beneficial bacteria?"

    "It's just like a desert!"

    Unfortunately that would be evidence enough for the MHRA (the medicines regulator in the UK who now consider homeopathy to be medicine).

    --
    -- Using the preview button since 2005