Slashdot Mirror


Woman's House Robbed After Fake Craigslist Post

flanksteak writes "The Seattle Times is reporting that a woman in nearby Tacoma had her rental property stripped of almost everything after someone posted a fake Craigslist announcement that everything in the house could be hauled away no questions asked. When contacted, Craigslist said they would release data about the poster if they were issued a subpoena."

365 comments

  1. They got this place too! by Burdell · · Score: 4, Funny

    Cleaned it out:

    "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

    1. Re:They got this place too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got a point.

    2. Re:They got this place too! by ByteSlicer · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... it out:

      "... for ... to ... ... . Please move ... ."

      (Even left some words for other people)

  2. Im evil by normuser · · Score: 2, Funny

    This really should be sad. But I laughed.

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    XXX#######
    1. Re:Im evil by mgabrys_sf · · Score: 1

      I know. it sounds like a "bad divorce" bar-joke. You know the one - "2006 Porshe for sale $100.00".

    2. Re:Im evil by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yup. I got a chain letter in the snail mail today that I can make $800,000 a week--as seen on Oprah!--if I mailed five one dollar bills to the addresses in the letter. People will believe anything.

    3. Re:Im evil by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a country song?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    4. Re:Im evil by jcr · · Score: 1

      People are still sending chain letters with real postage? I thought those idiots were all using e-mail by now.

      If the Buddha runs into Dave Rhodes on the road, I hope the Buddha kills him.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    5. Re:Im evil by packeteer · · Score: 4, Informative

      It might be a song too but it is most likely a reference to a radio DJ. He hit on some model over the air and his wife sold his ~$45,000 car for $5 on ebay.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    6. Re:Im evil by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Recently divorced women sometimes have the *best* garage sales. I've gotten some excellent hand tools that way, at rock bottom prices.

    7. Re:Im evil by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      It's easier to have the 'mark' slip $1 bills in an envelope than it is to have them PayPal your email address.

    8. Re:Im evil by westlake · · Score: 1
      This really should be sad. But I laughed.

      This isn't how CNN's (female) anchors reacted when the story hit. This isn't how the story played out world-wide.

      Too often the geek reinforces the stereotypes that do him the most harm.

    9. Re:Im evil by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We can conclude from your post that:
      • Women are more compassionate than men and would never experience schadenfreude. Therefore, a woman would not laugh at this article.
      • A geek laughed at this story. Therefore, all geeks must be men

      Do I have that right?
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    10. Re:Im evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im evil

      No, you're just a slashtard. Congratulations.

    11. Re:Im evil by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I got a toolbox for my truck for $10.
      I asked her and found out more than I wanted to know. In brief he left her for some girl, so she sold all his stuff.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    12. Re:Im evil by westlake · · Score: 1

      A geek laughed at this story. Therefore, all geeks must be men
      Do I have that right?

      When the geek is the only one laughing. perhaps it is time to take a look around and ask why. I doubt anyone unaccustomed to Slashdot could follow these threads without being reminded of the stereotypical geek - the poorly socialized, forever-adolescent, male.

  3. Just picked up - wait a minute... by Tacoma_Furniture_Sal · · Score: 4, Funny

    Uh oh.

    1. Re:Just picked up - wait a minute... by MollyB · · Score: 1

      It is my (perhaps erroneous) understanding that being modded "Funny" does not change one's karma. On your last point, as others have succinctly noted, if Slashdot is so bad, what are you still doing here?

    2. Re:Just picked up - wait a minute... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but positive mods on a new ID wouldn't garner any karma on the user's regular ID...

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  4. Lots of vultures out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Jeez. It's sad but in a different way. Makes me sad about the nature of man. What happened to common decency?

    I wonder what will happen if someone posts a photo on the internet with a personal ad "Hey I'm 18 and hot, come and have sex with me, even if I say no. My address is..."

    I hope the people who plundered crap at least have the decency to bring it back if they hear it on the news. It almost makes me wonder how they got into the apartment? Someone ought to be charged with breaking and entering.

    1. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn cant find it on the web but there was a guy who posted his ex wife or gf on some fantasy rape site. Basically the add said that she has a rape fantasy and some guy actually attempted the rape. Dont know much else.

    2. Re:Lots of vultures out there by LionKimbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What happened to common decency?

      A huge population (Tacoma,) would have to be uncommonly decent, some might even say unnaturally decent, in order for there not to be a few vultures present.

      As it is, it's Tacoma, and thus only has merely common levels of decency, and thus there's a few vultures present.

      Common decency itself remains intact.

    3. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      It almost makes me wonder how they got into the apartment? Someone ought to be charged with breaking and entering.

      10 to 1 odds it was the former tenant getting even for some percieved slight, such as "she asked me to pay my rent"

      Hopefully the idiot didn't cover his tracks too well. Posted A/C because I have no intention of paying up :)

    4. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I wonder what will happen if someone posts a photo on the internet with a personal ad "Hey I'm 18 and hot, come and have sex with me, even if I say no. My address is..." I've already seen that particular episode of Law & Order.
    5. Re:Lots of vultures out there by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      Something being on Law & Order doesn't automatically make it fake; They have been known to pull things from real headlines. Of course, if it was on Law & Order: SVU...

    6. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      A huge population (Tacoma,) would have to be uncommonly decent, some might even say unnaturally decent, in order for there not to be a few vultures present.

      It's not about the vultures themselves, it's about the lack of sufficiently negative consequences for being a vulture. The cops aren't going to bother going after either the looters or the ad poster.

    7. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Elladan · · Score: 1, Funny

      "As it is, it's Tacoma, and thus only has merely common levels of decency, and thus there's a few vultures present."

      ... that is, if you consider zombie hordes of meth heads prowling the streets in broad daylight, tearing people from their cars and then ripping the human flesh off with rotting zombie teeth and broken shards of Chihuly glass to be the common level of decency. We are talking about Tacoma here, right?

      Rrrroooaaaaaah... <drool> <stab> <stab> Wwwweeeeelcoo tuuu Taaaaacohma... <gnaw gnaw gnaw>

      Yeah, that's what Tacoma is like.

      She's lucky they didn't set up a meth lab and then torch the place to see the pretty colors.

    8. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Nethead · · Score: 1

      I didn't read TFA but was this in the Hilltop neighborhood?

      And WTF is Toyota naming a truck after that POS city? (Yes, I lived there, briefly, once.)

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    9. Re:Lots of vultures out there by walkie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah, Tacoma's not that bad. I'm not saying I want to build a summer home there, but the trees are actually quite lovely.

    10. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that we know of the dangers....

    11. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Its theft plain and simple its your job to verify if your actions are legal or not.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    12. Re:Lots of vultures out there by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Common decency? Hmmm... Oh yeah, I remember that. We pawned it off for a Big Mac, a sports car, and a cameo appearance on American Idol.

      It didn't bring us the happiness we wanted, but hey, we were on FOX being humiliated by Simon Cowell! How cool is that?

    13. Re:Lots of vultures out there by anagama · · Score: 1

      "tacomaroma"

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    14. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Eccles · · Score: 1

      What about the R.O.U.S.'s?

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    15. Re:Lots of vultures out there by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      A '79 Mustang does NOT qualify as a sports car.

    16. Re:Lots of vultures out there by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      cameo appearance on American Idol
      Being a contestant on "American Idol" is not a "cameo" appearance. If you mean that you are Gwen Stefani or Diana Ross and you showed up to coach and perform, that still isn't a "cameo" appearance.
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    17. Re:Lots of vultures out there by dwayneabailey · · Score: 0

      I don't think they exist.

    18. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      If pedantry was a martial art, you would have just knocked him across the room with a roundhouse kick, punched through his rib cage, torn out his heart, and held it aloft.

      Shang Tsung: Fatality!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    19. Re:Lots of vultures out there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you blaming the police? It's not even clear whose stuff was carted off. If the stuff in the house belonged to the sister, the sister is probably okay to have posted the ad. Even though some of the items (like mirrors and other hardware) belonged to Raye, those responding to the ad have an easy defense, since they wouldn't necessarily have known that those items were not included. Likewise, the sister could have assumed that people would not take the things that were bolted down. Who do you charge with what and make it stick?

      Even if none of the items belonged to the sister, the police are still doing exactly what they should do. First, they are not wasting taxpayer dollars when they're not likely to get a conviction. Second, they're minding their own business, allowing the victim to make her own decision as to whether or not her family member should face charges.

    20. Re:Lots of vultures out there by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you saying that you like the trees because they block the view of Tacoma when you are on the outside? That's why I like those trees.

    21. Re:Lots of vultures out there by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      Don't those people who walk on to sing, only to be torn apart by the judges count as a cameo? What of the crowd? If not, well... As the poster above said, "FATALITY."

    22. Re:Lots of vultures out there by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 1

      This was an episode of "Law and Order: SVU"...

      I don't think it was real.

      Stew

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
    23. Re:Lots of vultures out there by alienmole · · Score: 1

      Many (if not all?) episodes of Law and Order (all varieties) are based closely on real cases. If you follow the news much, it's often possible to recognize them. Don't know about this particular one, though.

  5. The Best Idea Ever by dj245 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a little sorry I didn't think of it first. I would of course use a library or an open wireless AP.

    On a related note, I have heard of a story about an ad placed on Craigslist asking for several construction workers for a job and to have their own tools. Workers show up, the guy asks them to deconstruct the house, and leaves. When the homeowner comes home at the end of the day he faces a bunch of angry unpaid construction workers and a demolished house.

    That one probably isn't true.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:The Best Idea Ever by eric76 · · Score: 4, Informative

      There was a similar incident reported in San Antonio several years ago (early 80s, if I remember correctly).

      Someone called up a demolition company and arranged for the house at such and such an address to be demolished. When the homeowner came home from work, his house was a pile of rubble.

      I think the demolition company's insurance had to cough up some serious money on that one.

    2. Re:The Best Idea Ever by sponga · · Score: 5, Interesting

      early 80's?
      this happened recently in the last 2 years in Southern California where they demoed the wrong house and the poor Mexican crew had no idea; it especially sucked because all the belongings were in the house and they went through it with a giant bulldozer.

      In fact this type of stuff happens all the time around here and especially with parties.
      The kids pass out flyers for a party at some elderly persons house who is not home or arrives home when it is prime time for the party; cops show up with the kids running everywhere jumping over the fence and all you have left is a couple of dumb drunk teenage girls who have no idea whats going on. It happens a lot also with houses for sale also since this is such a huge housing market around here.

      Another thing that happened around here and I find it funny that it never got news, but when the Dateline came to town in Long Beach,CA and some kids found out about it on craigslist or whatever source. So the kids print up some fliers at school on the printers saying "5 KEGGER, $2 at door girls are free, etc...." and sure enough a bunch of teenage kids show up curiously at the home expecting a party but the cops have to end up moving to a whole new area.

    3. Re:The Best Idea Ever by afidel · · Score: 4, Funny

      The one I pulled wasn't quite as mean spirited or destructive. I posted a picture of a classic Vette all over town with an ad stating that due to an unusual work schedule I could only be contacted between 2am and 6am. The price of the mint condition Vette? $6,000. Boy was my mark pissed off at being called at all hours of the night by people looking to buy the car. He never tried to pull another prank on me =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:The Best Idea Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another fun prank I had heard of was putting an advertisement in the newspaper for "Senior Appreciation Day: All seniors eat free!" at your local McDonald's. I don't know anyone who has done it, but it's remarkably simple.

    5. Re:The Best Idea Ever by noidentity · · Score: 1

      The house across the street was recently demolished and it was quite a sight. The guys arrived with a big backhoe-type machine that had a large chomper on the end and they had the single-story house flattened in half an hour, with several more hours spend pulverizing the foundation. Fortunately I think they would probably require more proof of intent than a Craig's List posting. It definitely had me thinking of the possibility of someone using it for revenge. Heh, at one point when the owner arrived he made a joke about "Wrong house! It as the one next to it."

    6. Re:The Best Idea Ever by BakaHoushi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, quick question, but wouldn't a demolition crew check a house thoroughly BEFORE tearing it down? I mean, even looking through the window, if you see a ton of furniture, especially stuff that'd sell pretty well on eBay at the very least, odds are, it's not really scheduled for demolition.

      And even if it really is, why not TAKE all of that furniture, first? I hate waste. Take the stuff for yourself, sell it, donate it to the homeless/a shelter/an orphanage/whatever! Tearing a place down still full of usable things seems just completely wrong to me, when people are still in need.

    7. Re:The Best Idea Ever by jez9999 · · Score: 0

      Boy was my mark pissed off at being called at all hours of the night by people looking to buy the car. He never tried to pull another prank on me =)

      You played this prank on your son??

    8. Re:The Best Idea Ever by reub2000 · · Score: 1
    9. Re:The Best Idea Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all you have left is a couple of dumb drunk teenage girls I'm guessing gramps wouldn't have too much of a problem with this.
    10. Re:The Best Idea Ever by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Demolition crews often don't think things through the way a humanitarian would.

    11. Re:The Best Idea Ever by John3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Demolition crews are often unskilled at everything except demolition. Sure, there might be nice vinyl windows, appliances, etc. in the house, but they have a job to do in a certain amount of time. If they stop to salvage materials then the job takes longer and the boss gets angry. Bulldozers are designed for broad strokes...so it's not surprising that they would just plow through the building without checking the contents first.

      --
      "We make our world significant by the courage of our questions and by the depth of our answers." Carl Sagan
    12. Re:The Best Idea Ever by mdm-adph · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      hey -- his name is "reub."

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    13. Re:The Best Idea Ever by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "all you have left is a couple of dumb drunk teenage girls who have no idea whats going on."

      I am intrigued by your ideas and would like to subscribe to your newsletter!

    14. Re:The Best Idea Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it went over his head so much as it just wasn't very funny. Sorry, dude.

    15. Re:The Best Idea Ever by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Boy was my mark pissed off at being called at all hours of the night
      All hours? They could have at least had the courtesy to keep it between 2 and 6 AM. Sheesh!
      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    16. Re:The Best Idea Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You live in 1920's Gangland?

      "Yea.. mouse knuckles, mouse knuckles, ya see?...."

    17. Re:The Best Idea Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      all you have left is a couple of dumb drunk teenage girls

      Giggity

    18. Re:The Best Idea Ever by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Around here, if a bulldozer tried to plow through a building, it would end up on it's kiester in the basement...

    19. Re:The Best Idea Ever by SDEggbert · · Score: 1

      Ha!

      I used to play similar pranks on my friends while I was in college. For a few years I lived on campus near the arena where concerts were often held. During the few hours preceding a concert we would hang big posters over the balcony that read "Extra Tickets! $10 (555) 555-5555." That phone number would be a roommate's or someone who we could laugh at when the phone would ring off the hook.

      Too funny

    20. Re:The Best Idea Ever by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      You are exactly right. It would take so much effort to clear out the house. Everybody should just think of all the hassle on moving day. It would be the same thing, every day, for a demo company.

      When I worked in the construction industry, I heard about a paving company that was sent to do a driveway. They pull up to a house and start working. The owner of the house comes out and watches, and doesn't say anything.

      At the end of the day, the neighbour on the other side of the street comes out and says, "When are you going to do my house?".

      "You have to book an appointment, first.".

      "Oh, no, no. I already did. You're supposed to do my house today.".

      It turns out that they paved the wrong driveway. It was a simple mistake that cost them a lot of money.

    21. Re:The Best Idea Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't fly. No one would demolish a furnished house. Furnishings are a dead giveaway that it's the wrong house.

      Furnishings such as: food in the fridge, working electricity and plumbing (which are supposed to get turned off), furniture, electronics, clothing, etc. It's VERY obvious when someone is living in a house.

  6. nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I saw an interview with this person on the news.

    1) They left the doors to the house UNLOCKED

    2) They pissed someone off.

    Ive often wondered if things like "free transmission behind X house" were actually something along these lines. Neighbours getting even. Its an interesting problem anyway that doesnt really have a solution I can see. No free webmail posts to craigslist?

    I could see the same thing happening to any classified ads service. How do you know the laptop your buying is not hot? The car parts you buy? Its not craigslists job to verify every ad for truth. The only thing that needs to happen, is the obviously doubbley duped salvagers give her the stuff back. Imagine how pissed that would make the evicted tenant or whoever.

    1. Re:nothing you can do about this by jbrader · · Score: 5, Funny
      OK, I'm from Tacoma. I really love it there but it's not the kind of place where you leave your door unlocked. Ever heard of Ted Bundy? He grew up in Tacoma. The Beltway Snipers got their gun in Tacoma. One of the Watergate conspirators was from Tacoma. You lock your doors.

      It's also the hometown of Frank Herbert and Bing Crosby so it's not all bad, but still.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    2. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also that thing, you know, about the bridge. So I guess you're right, not everything in Tacoma is safe!

    3. Re:nothing you can do about this by Khaed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1) They left the doors to the house UNLOCKED

      This does not make going in and stealing the property any more legal.

      And Craiglist is being pretty stupid here, IMO. "One of our users obviously caused a crime to take place... so we're going to be stubborn about it."

      2) They pissed someone off.

      Pissing someone off does not make theft legal, either.

      The person who posted the fake ad should be convicted for the theft, and the people who took things should not -- if they give said stuff back.

    4. Re:nothing you can do about this by the+Dragonweaver · · Score: 1

      Bing grew up in Spokane, not Tacoma. His childhood home is now the Alumni center for Gonzaga University.

      Despite the rumors to the contrary, he was not expelled from Gonzaga for pushing a piano out of the fourth floor of DeSmet. But it makes a great tale for gullible froshlings.

      --
      Actually I am a lab rat in an elaborate plot to take over the world.
    5. Re:nothing you can do about this by norton_I · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And Craiglist is being pretty stupid here, IMO. "One of our users obviously caused a crime to take place... so we're going to be stubborn about it."


      Requiring a subpoena to release such records is a wise and reasonable move. It ensures that craigslist does not make the same mistake all the people who mistakenly stole property from this lady made. This is what supboenas are for, and given that there is, according to the article, an abundance of evidence of wrongdoing, getting one should be easy and fast. Releasing the name to the public, or really to anyone but the police with proper documentation, would be inappropriate and possibly comprimise the investigation.
    6. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They aren't being stubborn about anything. They know a crime took place, they know their site was used to facilitate it. Just like any other request for personal information they will comply as soon as they have a subpoena, warrant, court order, or whatever else legally obliges them to divulge the information. This isn't exactly a life and death situation, and they are doing the right thing here. Things would be a lot worse if they had just given up the information without a court order. They are covering their own asses by requiring this while at the same time protecting the majority of their users from abusive requests by law enforcement which would almost certainly occur if they divulged this type of information without cause.

    7. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm psuedo-from Tacoma as well (lived there until last August) and I have to say, at least the area is getting better. Maybe the meth-heads in Spanaway decided to seize the day and capitalize? I used to leave my house unlocked all the time and never had a problem.. guess i just got lucky.

      The story was on cnn.com... pretty funny, they literally took the kitchen sink. The worst thing about all this is that a cop saw the posting, but when they took it off craigslist he didn't take any action whatsoever to prevent anythign from happening. Shows how many people look at c-l.

    8. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I voted your mom into Congress.

    9. Re:nothing you can do about this by cdrguru · · Score: 3, Informative

      Any newspaper would collect enough billing information to send the person a bill. And, by the way, have enough real identification to be able to track down the person that did it.

      Craigslist, because it is on the Internet and anonymous, has no identity verification at all. Many people, most in fact, will do things they would never consider doing if they know it can never be traced back to them and there cannot possibly be any consequences.

      I assure you, there would be consequences with a newspaper classified.

    10. Re:nothing you can do about this by nuzak · · Score: 3, Funny

      > You know the type -- liars, thieves, doles, and the dupes who voted them into congress.

      I'm pretty sure the Doles are republicans actually :)

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    11. Re:nothing you can do about this by RealGrouchy · · Score: 5, Informative

      RTFA. It's a rental unit, as this person pointed out already. And it was devoid of personal belongings. And the victim is the landlady; she doesn't live there.

      Methinks it would be very difficult for a Ted Bundy type to attack her in that apartment when she doesn't live there.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    12. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ive often wondered if things like "free transmission behind X house" were actually something along these lines."

      Damn why didnt i think of that? I know where theres a couple golden retrievers that i wouldnt mind falling victim to this.

    13. Re:nothing you can do about this by jbrader · · Score: 1

      I didn't say he grew up there, he was born there though. I've been to the house and everything.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    14. Re:nothing you can do about this by Sancho · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pissing someone off does not make theft legal, either. Jeez, for the last time, it's not theft, it's COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.
    15. Re:nothing you can do about this by jbrader · · Score: 1

      Yeah you should have seen it in the 80's when I was a kid. It was like Detroit in Robocop.

      --
      You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
    16. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough cough* Tacompton

      heh, just joking, born, raised, and still live here. I love this city even if some parts are a little wacky.

      Lets not forget also that Mars candy started here, the DJ Donald Glaude is from here, and so was that one world class bowler... lol.

    17. Re:nothing you can do about this by Solokron · · Score: 1

      I am also from Tacoma (several areas in fact) and I completely agree with this. Although better now days than in the past, Tacoma is not a place you keep your doors unlocked.

      --
      30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
    18. Re:nothing you can do about this by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      Why anyone would leave their doors unlocked anywhere is beyond me. Is turning the key really that time-consuming that there's some compelling reason not to?

    19. Re:nothing you can do about this by Khaed · · Score: 1, Funny

      I thought it was piracy.

      else, what am I to do with all these silly eyepatches?

    20. Re:nothing you can do about this by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      1) They left the doors to the house UNLOCKED
      This does not make going in and stealing the property any more legal.


      No, but if the doors had been locked, she probably still would have had her stuff. These weren't thieves, these were people taking stuff they thought was being given away free. If the doors were looked, they would probably have shrugged and come back another time, not broken in and nicked her stuff.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    21. Re:nothing you can do about this by Basehart · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "and everything"

      You killed lots of people?

    22. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Although you have to admit it would be cool to know the poster's address. We could go take all of his stuff :)

    23. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      How many unlocked homes did Ted Bundy invade to find his victims?

      Did the Beltway Snipers shoot through unlocked windows to kill?

      Did the Watergate burglars find the key under the welcome mat to steal your American Pie 3 DVD?

      If only people had learned to lock their front doors earlier, eh? This is how the world likes its Americans: good people, well scared, fully ignorant.

    24. Re:nothing you can do about this by kjart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I saw an interview with this person on the news.
      1) They left the doors to the house UNLOCKED
      2) They pissed someone off.

      Hate to say it, but insurance scam?

    25. Re:nothing you can do about this by ma1wrbu5tr · · Score: 1

      Nothing you can do about the smell either. Tacoma, literally, smells like a toilet. I hate when I have to drive south on 5 from Seattle. You can almost smell it from Kent. They don't know which smell is worse there though; the meth labs, or the paper mill.

      --
      Why can't we go back to using jumpers to configure slot adapter cards? Why? I say!
    26. Re:nothing you can do about this by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Don't forget about the cop that shot his wife in front of his kids, and then himself. Wasn't he an ex-chief?

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    27. Re:nothing you can do about this by alphamugwump · · Score: 1

      Well, I used to live out in the woods. My parents never lock the door, mainly because the door doesn't shut. Also, my brothers poured wax in the keyhole, making it hard to insert the key.

      Besides, I've carried washing machines and stuff down that hill, and looting the place would really be more trouble than it's worth.

    28. Re:nothing you can do about this by owlnation · · Score: 1

      I assure you, there would be consequences with a newspaper classified.
      This is very true. Also, Craigslist's flagging system does not always work. If you look at any of the European Craigslist sites, around 90% of the ads for any city are scams or spam. There are very few genuine ads. These sites read like SEO link farms. Since their system requires a critical mass of users for it to work, and lack of genuine ads means lack of genuine users, the spammers and scammers win.

      Craigslist staff do a very very poor job of proactively taking down obvious scams and spam, never mind more subtle ones. The way they manage filtering technology is very poor.

      While they do have this ethos that they want to keep costs down, the result is that they really don't run their site to a professional standard. I would suspect that while they are popular now, their days are numbered. In a few years Craigslist will be gone.
    29. Re:nothing you can do about this by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "The person who posted the fake ad should be convicted for the theft, and the people who took things should not -- if they give said stuff back."

      I believe that the people who took things are guilty of accepting stolen property, and the person who posted the fake ad is guilty of fraud.

      --
      stuff |
    30. Re:nothing you can do about this by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      When we bought this house, the back door, off the kitchen, only locked with a skeleton key.

    31. Re:nothing you can do about this by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Only nominally, if you ask anyone on a conservative blog.

    32. Re:nothing you can do about this by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Craigslist, because it is on the Internet and anonymous, has no identity verification at all. Many people, most in fact, will do things they would never consider doing if they know it can never be traced back to them and there cannot possibly be any consequences.

      of course the people who belive that are almost certainly wrong. cragslist presumablly have an IP and timestamp, with the ISPs cooperation that should be enough unless the person making the post was carefull to cover thier tracks.

      Any newspaper would collect enough billing information to send the person a bill.
      here in the uk there are very often special papers where it is free to place your advert with the cost being borne by the buyer. Usually theese are local in scope but i don't belive there is any identity checking in posting to them. Probablly more anonymous than cragslist.

      but even assuming a regular newspaper personal information can be hidden. They can pay using a stolen or prepaid card and give fake addresses (or even the address of the victim). They can ensure stuff is printed rather than handwritten, use gloves etc. How is this any different than chaining proxies to avoid internet based tracking?

      afaict criminals generally get caught either because they are too stupid/ignorant to take proper precautions or because they commit many crimes and eventually get careless or unlucky.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    33. Re:nothing you can do about this by Tink2000 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Bing Crosby killed people? I never trusted that pipesmoking, whistling jerk anyway.

    34. Re:nothing you can do about this by jasonhamilton · · Score: 1

      I disagree, as long as most of their listings are free, and the competition is not, they have a place.

      --
      SearchIRC - Now with live chat directory!
    35. Re:nothing you can do about this by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ironically, without a contract, even legit 'pickups' could land you in jail if you were the target ( instead of the 'oferrer' ).

      Its just your word against his, and he can prove ownership. You cant.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    36. Re:nothing you can do about this by UbuntuDupe · · Score: 1

      I am NAL, but I'm pretty sure that laws regarding accepting stolen property require that the receiver have some reasonable belief that it's stolen. (For example, your little brother making minimum wage gives you a heavy golden chain that was "on sale".) Someone wanting a house emptied of cheap goods that they don't want to dispose of themselves, is not too unrealistic of a scenario, esp. if the house is unlocked. No, I'm not saying it's okay to take from any house with the doors unlocked, but when there's an ad from someone who appears to know what they're talking about, and knows it's unlocked, a reasonable person might believe they really are being given away and are not accepting stolen property.

    37. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regular door locks only stop the honest and/or very lazy crooks.

      Picks, pick guns, bump keys, or crowbars tend to make short work of most consumer locks. Locks are a speed bump, not a stop sign, to anyone after your goods on anything more than an opportunistic basis.

      Turning that key really only gives you peace of mind that your home owner's insurance will cover part of the cost of replacing your stuff.

    38. Re:nothing you can do about this by Politburo · · Score: 1

      If they left the doors unlocked, it's highly unlikely insurance will cover the losses.

    39. Re:nothing you can do about this by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Detroit is like Detroit in Robocop.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    40. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
      according to the article, an abundance of evidence of wrongdoing, getting one should be easy and fast

      Good thing the cops are on the case!

      The sibling rivalry is one of the reasons Tacoma Police are not looking at this as a criminal case.
      ... never mind. Silly me, of course the cops are going to be concentrating on important stuff, like figuring out how to seize and auction off entire families' properties because their little Timmy took a toke. Unimportant stuff like fraud, robbery and murder should be left to civil courts.
    41. Re:nothing you can do about this by InsaneProcessor · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Blatent criminal activiy is a good reason to release the information. Craigslist needs to do the right thing and expose the perpitrator.

      --

      Athiesm is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.
    42. Re:nothing you can do about this by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      I've never seen an insurance policy that stated theft is only covered when the door is locked. And I have read through numerous policy declarations.

    43. Re:nothing you can do about this by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Nobody said copyright infringement was legal.

      Just less illegal ;-).

    44. Re:nothing you can do about this by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Blatent criminal activiy is a good reason to release the information. Craigslist needs to do the right thing and expose the perpitrator.

      That's the prosecutor's job, not Craig's List. I believe they will do the right thing through the right channels. Satisfying the media's, yours, or my thirst for identity isn't necessarily the right thing, even if we want it.

      Besides, Craigslist will probably find the IP is at a coffee house, then there will have to be further subpoenas for more information to find the perp.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    45. Re:nothing you can do about this by amohat · · Score: 0, Troll

      Thanks Captain Ethical!

      If it wasn't for you setting the record straight, who knows what sort of chaos might have ensued!?!?

    46. Re:nothing you can do about this by canadian_right · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it is very common in insurance policies to have a clause that there must be evidence of "a break in" to cover theft. A broken window, busted door, jimmied window, whatever. Some car insurance will not cover your car if you leave the keys in it - after all it is theft insurance not stupidity insurance.

      --
      Anarchists never rule
    47. Re:nothing you can do about this by sofla · · Score: 1

      1) They left the doors to the house UNLOCKED

      This does not make going in and stealing the property any more legal.

      I would think it would reduce the charges from "Breaking and Entering" to "Criminal Trespass", as they didn't commit the crime of forcing their way into someone else's house. So in that sense its "more" legal.

      And as another poster already pointed out, if the doors had been locked, the crime may not have happened in the first place. Its still a terrible thing that it happened, but leaving the house wide open is just irresponsible. Zero sympathy from me.

    48. Re:nothing you can do about this by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      They are, however, required to give it back.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    49. Re:nothing you can do about this by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      But if nobody reads the free listings because they are mostly scams, then people will have to pay one of the competitors if they want people to actually read their ads. That for example, is why ebay gets most of the business, despite being more expensive than the competition.

    50. Re:nothing you can do about this by Khaed · · Score: 0, Redundant

      When you post someone else's information, I think your right to privacy becomes pretty much void. Craiglist should just turn the guy's info over to the cops. He's already shown a disrespect for privacy.

    51. Re:nothing you can do about this by WillyMF1 · · Score: 1

      I never lock my house. Like you said, its has always seemed pretty much worthless to do so. Do you really have to lock in order for insurance to cover though? Do you have to have a alarm system too? What about dogs. Seems like they might want to require them as well.

    52. Re:nothing you can do about this by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

      My insurance policy, and the policies of all the companies I looked at when I took it out say they will only pay up where there is evidence of forced entry.

    53. Re:nothing you can do about this by Hatta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly right. Never cooperate with an investigation. If they really need the information, they'll just get a court order for it. Only then do you cooperate. If they don't get an order and you cooperate, then you've just given away information that you shouldn't have and you've opened yourself to liability.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    54. Re:nothing you can do about this by terrymr · · Score: 1

      It's not a crime at all if you believe you are doing it with the permission of the owner.

      The crime here is the posting on craigslist.

    55. Re:nothing you can do about this by terrymr · · Score: 1

      Forced entry is generally required before they'll pay for a burglary - I've even heard of one case where the insurer argued that because the burglar picked the lock there was no forced entry and therefore they didn't have to pay up.

    56. Re:nothing you can do about this by smagruder · · Score: 1

      Well, putting an ad in Craiglist also requires a verifiable e-mail address. Therefore, there's an extra path of traceability available to detectives.

      This also means that if the perp set up their e-mail account at a different public location than where they posted the ad (assuming both were done in public places, such as libraries), then detectives have an easier time narrowing it down, as they can do an intersection of individuals present at both scenes.

      --
      Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
    57. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you live were someone can use a chainsaw to cut a hole in your house to gain entry and the neighbors won't even notice, there's little reason to lock your door. I've lived like that and the big fear is someone with a moving van emptying the entire house.

    58. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any newspaper would collect enough billing information to send the person a bill.

      My newspaper has free ads now and you could always send cash. Classified ads were once the largest money maker for newspapers and they did very little to weed out fraud, far less than Craig's List. I'm glad to see another lame monopoly destory by the internet.

    59. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, two off-topics and one redundant. I get the feeling the mods don't like the idea of this asshole getting punished.

    60. Re:nothing you can do about this by Khaed · · Score: 1

      Thanks Captain Tiny Penis!

      If it wasn't for you spreading stupid sarcasm, who knows what sort of chaos might have ensued?!?!

    61. Re:nothing you can do about this by syukton · · Score: 1

      Fraud, conspiracy to commit theft (depending on the value of the property, conspiracy to commit grand theft), harassment...

      I'm sure there's a huge list of charges they could be brought up on.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    62. Re:nothing you can do about this by syukton · · Score: 1

      I had my license plates stolen in Tacoma a few months ago. The lock on my truck was forced too (TBH, a screwdriver would have opened that lock it was so damn old) and some shoes I was waiting to return to the store were stolen. If my girlfriend didn't live in Tacoma I'd never go back there. heh.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    63. Re:nothing you can do about this by syukton · · Score: 1

      By "Careful to cover their tracks" do you mean "too poor to use their own computer, so they went to the library" ?
      Or do you mean "sitting at any of the hundreds of unsecured wireless access points owned by individuals and businesses alike" ?

      If all you have to go on is an IP address, the investigation can take months and may be called off due to lack of technical knowledge. If a library was used, a signup sheet may be able to tie the perp to a computer, but what if the entire library is behind a NAT device? Then everybody using a computer at that time would have the same IP. There's also nothing to prevent somebody from signing up as "Somebody Jones" on the signup sheet.

      The recently-evicted tenant is a likely suspect, but if they've been evicted they likely don't have money for housing and will be difficult to track down due to the possibility of a presently-transient situation.

      --
      Reinvent the wheel only at either a lower cost, greater effectiveness, or your own personal enrichment and satisfaction.
    64. Re:nothing you can do about this by amohat · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's not your A-game...I'm sure you can do better.

    65. Re:nothing you can do about this by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Actually, yeah. I live in a borough of 300 people, so if I get robbed, I can literally just ask everybody.

    66. Re:nothing you can do about this by Khaed · · Score: 1

      Why waste my A-game on a /. post?

    67. Re:nothing you can do about this by amohat · · Score: 1

      So you don't look lame for coming wack. Little penis come-back? Just terrible. I just want you to try your best is all. You can do it!

    68. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Detroit in Robocop is actually Dallas.

    69. Re:nothing you can do about this by bughunter · · Score: 1
      As a rental property owner I can testify to the custom of leaving an unoccupied rental unit unlocked.

      The main benefit is to allow prospective renters to inspect the place without the owner or property manager being present.

      However, after this, we will probably have to rethink this and perhaps use a lockbox or leave a key with another tenant.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
    70. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to go, Captain obvious!

      No one claimed it made anything any less illegal.
      Only that a) they pissed people off, and b) they leave all their doors unlocked. That's bullshit waiting to happen, imho. Might as well put up a neon sign on the front lawn, too.

    71. Re:nothing you can do about this by HTTP+Error+403+403.9 · · Score: 1

      asshole
      Actually that's kinda funny.
      --
      I'm not a Troll, it's reverse psychology.
    72. Re:nothing you can do about this by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 1

      You know, a friend of mine works in corporate security and taught me to bump locks.

      It really only takes about 5-6 seconds for an experienced guy to open a standard lock.

      Almost nobody uses hardened locks unless you have a home-museum or rare collection of antiques or some such. Even the best hardened locks can be bumped in 30-60 seconds by an experienced lock picker.

      The fact that some crooks are stupid does lean toward locking doors rather than leaving them unlocked, but the lock itself really isn't that much of a deterrent for a determined and/or skilled person.

      If I were Ted Bundy, I would learn the art of lock picking. :-)

      Stew

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
    73. Re:nothing you can do about this by ffflala · · Score: 1

      Oh it's even worse than that: Tonya Harding has been known to host karyoke night at a Tacoma area bar.

    74. Re:nothing you can do about this by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Well, here in the UK a friend of mine had to get better locks fitted before his insurance company would cover his Mac. Personally I'd assume that if I go out and leave the house unsecured and I'm burgled, then my insurance company is going to fight very hard not to pay up. (That's going on the general assumption that insurance companies do their absolute best not to pay up whenever possible, mind...)

    75. Re:nothing you can do about this by freeweed · · Score: 1

      Then you need to look a bit further for insurance coverage.

      Hell, with modern Comprehensive homeowner coverage, you can claim stuff you LOST. As in, misplaced and you just cannot find it anymore.

      Note: things may be different in the UK. Plus, this house was a rental property, which typically DOES have a forced-entry clause. However, for your average homeowner in North America, theft coverage doesn't usually contain a forced-entry clause.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    76. Re:nothing you can do about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Decrease global warming?

    77. Re:nothing you can do about this by Archades54 · · Score: 1

      The Evicted tenant may have unlocked the property with a copied key, or people may have just broken in( hence taking the door)

      THe peopel that took items, should be warned or charged with stealing, as they did unlawfully remove items that didn't belong to them.

      You'd think the population would have more brains then to just steal items thinking it's ok because an internet adlist said so.

      --
      If your neighbours roof is flying past your window, you know it's cyclone season.
  7. Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is Rob "cmdrtaco" Malda.

    I have to get rid of everything in my house quickly, and I'm gonna let it go for free in order to get it out of here fast. Please leave the computers in the back closet though, I use those for slashdot.

    Thanks

    Rob

    1. Re:Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hi, cmdrtaco again... please also leave the hamster cages alone where the electricity for the servers is generated. And the pet food I need to keep the app server and the db server running. Also remember the cable modem belongs to the cable company so just leave that connected to the hamsters.

    2. Re:Hi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      PS: please leave alone the manatee, his keyboard, and the two sticks tied to his flippers.. I use him to edit article submissions for the site.

  8. I'm non-plussed by fiendo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know it's supposed to be "news" that crime continues to exist despite (and sometimes with the facilitation of) the internet, but I can't seem to muster up the energy. I'm sure that when the phone was popularized there were initially stories about how people would use this new technology for dastardly crimes, such as getting pizzas delivered to the wrong address, but do we really at this point need be kept informed of the breaking development that yes, new technologies will be used by criminals as well as law-abiding citizens? Maybe I'm just crabby and this is a good old heads-up.

    --
    I went to the city because I wished to live without deliberation.
    1. Re:I'm non-plussed by NFN_NLN · · Score: 2, Funny

      do we really at this point need be kept informed of the breaking development that yes, new technologies will be used by criminals

      When the stories are this funny.... then yes :)

    2. Re:I'm non-plussed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't you mean you're non-non-plussed?

      because it sounds like it.

    3. Re:I'm non-plussed by fiendo · · Score: 1

      Nope, just confused. It appears I'm not alone.

      --
      I went to the city because I wished to live without deliberation.
    4. Re:I'm non-plussed by ADRenalyn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You obviously had enough energy to type a paragraph about it, rather than moving on to a story that would interest you more.

    5. Re:I'm non-plussed by sootman · · Score: 1

      Yeah. My wife manages a rental property in a not-so-good area that is currently empty because the owner is trying to sell it. Just a few days ago some people broke in, partied, then broke things, even going so far as to plug up the sink and leave the water running, ruining all the kitchen cabinetry. (The floor itself is tile.) No computer was involved, though, so it didn't make the front page of Slashdot.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    6. Re:I'm non-plussed by ni42 · · Score: 1

      I agree that crime is nothing new, and the older stuff is no less tragic than the newer stuff. I do think there is some value, however, in hearing about this. People are familiar with the idea of pizzas being delivered to the wrong address, even though it's not in the news, because that particular prank has been around awhile and has seeped into popular culture. But since most people don't sit around all day thinking up pranks and crimes, newer scams (fake craigslist post, fake PayPal login page, etc) haven't occurred to them. Sure, as you get older, you (hopefully) are more savvy and not easily taken in by *any* form of chicanery. But hearing about a particular technique in the news can help you connect the dots a lot faster. (Or, if you're gullible, connect the dots *at all*...)

      Of course, this isn't why it IS in the news; it's there because they can make new technology seem all dramatic and scary and silly things like that. But I do think it's a good thing to keep people informed, yes.

  9. Sounds like a classic urban myth, only real by edwardpickman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's bizzare because it really does fit a classic urban myth profile. It obviously happened and the owner was shook up but it shows why urban myths are often believeable. Gotta wonder why no one that stripped the house questioned it. At least the first few to show up it must have looked like a normal house. It got pretty trashed so the later ones at least had an excuse.

    1. Re:Sounds like a classic urban myth, only real by YGingras · · Score: 1

      The first people to arrive were probably the ones who posted the con post. When you do something suspicious, always have a good reason to be where you are, before things start to get be border line. Even people from your group are queried individually, they all tell the same story.

    2. Re:Sounds like a classic urban myth, only real by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      Well, there's a reason the term is usually "urban legend," rather than "myth." There's no requirement that it's false; the legend status comes from its spread rate and pattern. I wouldn't be surprised if this does become one. As you say, it just sort of -sounds- like one.

    3. Re:Sounds like a classic urban myth, only real by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      Really? Sounds fake to me...

      How would she have known about the craigslist post? It sounds to me like she had a bad water heater, front door, and sink, plus a broken window... So she cleared the stuff out and called the cops to be able to make an insurance claim.

      If this was real, she wouldn't have known about the craigslist angle. She'd simply have thought her house was vandalized.

    4. Re:Sounds like a classic urban myth, only real by jt418-93 · · Score: 1

      to most ppl it would just sound like another freecycle 'come and get it' event.

      --
      -.no
  10. This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    RTFA. This was a piece of rental property that the woman owned. It was empty. None of her personal things were taken.

    1. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by penix1 · · Score: 1

      Which begs the question of was it a disgruntled tenant? This is the silliest thing I've heard of though. People actually believe what some numb-nut says on the Interweb?!?!? If so, I have some prime real estate for sale in Florida with such a pretty name....The Everglades...

      B.

      --
      This is a sig. This is only a sig. Had this been an actual sig you would have been informed where to tune for more sigs.
    2. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by munpfazy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      RTFA. This was a piece of rental property that the woman owned. It was empty. None of her personal things were taken.


      Actually, it may be even *less* shocking than that. She evicted a tenant and then "cleaned out that rental."

      Assuming the tenant didn't know the rental had been cleaned out, this could have easily been an honest mistake: a former tenant giving away the personal possessions he believed were left behind in his apartment. Without having read the original post, there's no reason to imagine the intent was "come steal my landlord's the water heater and windows" rather than "come get a free couch that I left behind when I had to move in with my sister in a hurry."

      Granted, inviting everyone on Craig's list to empty out a house and not making arrangements to insure someone is around to meet them may not be particularly thoughtful. But it's hardly robbery.

    3. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused - in exactly what way does this beg the question?

    4. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by lindseyp · · Score: 4, Informative

      No it doesn't beg the question, but it does indeed raise it. ;)

      A known disgruntled previous tenant, her sister who was evicted, is apparently the prime suspect.

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
    5. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Solokron · · Score: 1

      Considering a woman took a sink with her, I don't think it matters if it was a rental or not.

      --
      30% off web hosting. Coupon code "SLASHDOT".
    6. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Would you consider trading it for a nice bridge in New York city?

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    7. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      RTFA. This was a piece of rental property that the woman owned. It was empty. None of her personal things were taken.

      Huh? The fixtures etc... taken from the rental property were certainly her property. Theft is theft.
       
       

      Assuming the tenant didn't know the rental had been cleaned out, this could have easily been an honest mistake: a former tenant giving away the personal possessions he believed were left behind in his apartment. Without having read the original post, there's no reason to imagine the intent was "come steal my landlord's the water heater and windows" rather than "come get a free couch that I left behind when I had to move in with my sister in a hurry."
       
      Granted, inviting everyone on Craig's list to empty out a house and not making arrangements to insure someone is around to meet them may not be particularly thoughtful. But it's hardly robbery.

      Regardless of his intent (malicious or merely stupid), when his lease/rental was terminated he lost the right to acess the property and (more importantly) the right to grant others acess to the property. (Something that, as a landlord in Washington state, I've had to point out to former and soon to be former tenants on several occasions.) Further, the original post specifically stated "everything on the property is free" - which is a rather sweeping statement.
       
      If the evicted tenant did make the post, then I suspect that under the law he is liable - at least civilly if not criminally.
    8. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Aokubidaikon · · Score: 1

      This was a piece of rental property that the woman owned. It was empty. None of her personal things were taken.

      That's right. They took nothing excluding the kitchen sink ;)

    9. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by aguenter · · Score: 1

      I doubt any reasonable judge, given your scenario, could possibly find removing a water heater or faucet (permanent fixtures) from a home "hardly robbery".

      It's a bit more dimensional.

    10. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 2, Interesting

      from the link: "The sibling rivalry is one of the reasons Tacoma Police are not looking at this as a criminal case. They say it's a civil matter."

      IANAL but that's bullshit, isn't it? Since when has being related to the victim been a defense against a theft - or any other - charge?

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
    11. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by MirthScout · · Score: 1

      Without having read the original post, there's no reason to imagine the intent was "come steal my landlord's the water heater and windows" rather than "come get a free couch that I left behind when I had to move in with my sister in a hurry."


      I don't think she went to live with her sister. Her sister is the landlord that evicted her.
    12. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They also ripped out the entire kitchen, electrical wiring, plumbing, windows, doors... Maybe I just don't have much stuff, but in my house all of that is worth much more than the actual personal contents.

    13. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      The article makes it sound to me like an angry former tenant, embittered about an eviction in which some of their personal belongings left behind were disposed of, decided to get back at their landlord by having her home (i.e. not the rental property in question) stripped of its belongings.

      But the article really isn't crystal clear.

    14. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by swv3752 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We are not getting the whole story here. Just a guess, but I would say that the Owner posted on Craigslist. The furniture in the place was the sister's. The sister took revenge and stole the fixtures and doors and stuff. The police know or suspect all this and do not want get involved, especially as those that came in and took the couch and related items really were taking them on good faith.

      I would suggest to anyone in the future, After evicting a tenant, and failure to claim property, either auction/yard sale the stuff, or set asid e a specific time to be there when you let people haul stuff away.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    15. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      It was the rental that was stripped. And it was a family feud. And the police are not investigating the matter bacuase it is a family feud. One of the comments above has a link to a local paper that has more detail.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    16. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Excellent, you're right, I see that now. Ignore my post above. :)

    17. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      "After evicting a tenant, and failure to claim property, either auction/yard sale the stuff, or set asid e a specific time to be there when you let people haul stuff away."

      You would most likely be violating the law. If a tennant vacates and leaves items behind, it is the responsibility of the landlord to secure and store the items, and provide access to the items to the tennant. The landlord doesn't necessarily have to do this free, but any charges would have to be reasonable and explained. I know this the hard way after evicting a scumbag from an aprtment I used to own, then getting sued by her because she didn't pick up her "thrift store" furniture after 2 1/2 months, and I had it hauled away. Live and leaarn I guess. (Side note - I did end up justifying the keeping of about 90% of her damage deposit though, which was well more than the "value" of her crap I threw out and was sued for.)

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    18. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by j-beda · · Score: 1
      It was the rental that was stripped. And it was a family feud. And the police are not investigating the matter because it is a family feud.

      Sometimes it seems as though the authorities are not aggressive enough with this "domestic matters" - like what should it matter if the person I am ripping off is a relative?

    19. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would most likely be violating the law. If a tennant vacates and leaves items behind, it is the responsibility of the landlord to secure and store the items, and provide access to the items to the tennant.

      That depends on the state. In Texas the landlord can just dump it on the curb. I've seen people evicted in less that 24 hours (after having a out of hand party). I've also seen people stealing someone's stuff off the curb, because the tennet wasn't there to protect it.

    20. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Well, technically you could dump a tennant's stuff on the curb in any state - but you would be in violation of the law, even in Texas, if you didn't store it for at least 60 days. Here is the Texas law regarding a landlord removing a tennants possesions -

      IX. Landlord's Removal of Property After Abandonment by the Tenant

      A landlord may remove and store any property of a tenant that remains after the premises has been abandoned. The landlord may also dispose of the stored property if the tenant does not claim the property within 60 days after the date the property is stored. The landlord must deliver by certified mail to the tenant at the tenant's last known address a notice stating that the landlord may dispose of the tenant's property if the tenant does not claim the property within 60 days after the date the property is stored.

      http://ezinearticles.com/?Texas-Real-Property-Law- for-Commercial-Landlords&id=118527
      http://legalcatch.wordpress.com/2007/02/12/texas-r eal-property-law-for-commercial-landlords/

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    21. Re:This isn't as bad as it sounds. by munpfazy · · Score: 1

      According to a a second article linked to in one of the other followup posts, http://www.komotv.com/news/6888002.html , the advert "invited people to take 'items outside this home and in the garage on the 1200 block of East 64th Street.'"

      No guarantee the quote is accurate, but it's the only direct quote I've seen, and it doesn't sound like an invitation to take windows and water heaters. I'd love to see the entire craigslist post if anyone has found a copy.

      I'm not arguing that the former tenant isn't legally responsible for what happened, only that it may not have been malicious.

  11. No, but it's bad by wanax · · Score: 1

    Hot water heater? Front door (if metal)? These are not cheap items.

    I do think that the police should be the ones to handle this situation, and they'll certainly be able to get a warrant on the matter. However, if craigslist users think that this type of post is 'reasonable' to the point of pulling something as heavy as the heater, they better do something about dissuading people from making that type of post, whether it's public shaming, encouraging reporting of too-good-to-be-true posts or whatever else that somebody can dream up. In my opinion it's unreasonable for a classified service not to have some responsibility to guard against abuses such as what occured.

    1. Re:No, but it's bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not cheap, but they can be replaced. I'd be more upset with the loss of family photos, hard drives, artwork, books, etc. than I would with something like a water heater. Also, since this is rental property, it's a business. She can take a tax deduction for loss, and she probably has insurance anyway.

    2. Re:No, but it's bad by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      How does, "she probably has insurance" make it any less of a crime? It seems you have a fundamental misunderstanding of how insurance works. I'll give you a hint: It's not "free money from the sky," and the rates are not arbitrary.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    3. Re:No, but it's bad by EvanED · · Score: 1

      How does, "she probably has insurance" make it any less of a crime?

      It doesn't. All he's saying is that there was nothing of a personal or sensitive nature taken; it's just money. My physical computer is worth probably $500, and only that much 'cause it's got a huge monitor, a nice sound card, and what is still an obscene amount of hard drive space. Yet if it was stolen, I would pay FAR more than $500 to get it back, especially if whoever took it cleaned out my backup CDs too. If your water heater is stolen, you go buy a new water heater.

    4. Re:No, but it's bad by wanax · · Score: 1

      If your house burns down, yes, you can go buy a new water heater, in which case you spend your own money. Or, if you had home insurance they'll replace the water heater, in which case all your local neighbors, friends and anybody vaguely connected with whatever stat bin they place you will also have to pay. Real goods have been stolen. They won't be replaced for free. Unlike many of the digital scams that are addressed on /., there is a real cost to every owner in the neighborhood, local or statistical, whether insurance pays the claim or not.

    5. Re:No, but it's bad by Bastard+of+Subhumani · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Somebody pays, whether it's the victim and other insured people through increased future premiums or the shareholders of the company through reduced profits. Even if he gets a tax writeoff, that means Uncle Sam pays.

      --
      Only three things are certain; death, taxes, and apocryphal quotations - Ben Franklin.
  12. More evidence that people are cruel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    What really is lame is that since the former tenant was family the police are calling it a family feud. Thus, they won't issue the subpoena to Craigslist so that the lady can try and press criminal charges. Which basically means since the cops won't help her, she probably wouldn't even win in a civil courtroom. She'll never be able to prove who made the post without the police - and thus the crime will go unpunished. That's smart - police just are going to leave this door wide open.

    Regardless if she is a hated landlord - stealing from another person is pretty low.

    I hope some of those people who took things just bring them back.

    1. Re:More evidence that people are cruel... by schon · · Score: 1

      since the former tenant was family the police are calling it a family feud. Thus, they won't issue the subpoena to Craigslist so that the lady can try and press criminal charges That's insane. Why would the relationship have any bearing on whether a crime has been committed or not?

      Do the cops there just say "oh, it's a family fued" when they're called to some guy beating the shit out of his wife? Or when an adult child attacks their parent with a knife?

      If that's true, the cops need to be fired and replaced with people who will actually, y'know, do the job.
    2. Re:More evidence that people are cruel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You understand that a victim doesn't choose to press charges, right? That's a decision made by the DA's office. And that the police don't issue (or even serve, generally) subpoenas? They are legal documents related to the judicial branch, not executive. And also, that she could simply John Doe sue in civil court and have her lawyer issue a subpoena to Craigslist?

    3. Re:More evidence that people are cruel... by philpalm · · Score: 4, Informative

      http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/20 03654116_housestripped06m.html "Craigslist CEO Jim Buckmaster said an after-hours customer-service representative initially denied Raye's request for information, but after further review "we gathered enough info to be confident that we would be within the law to release the info to the victim herself." The ad was online for only about an hour and a half before enough craigslist users flagged it and it was removed, Buckmaster said." The latest update contradicts what you state. The name of the poster will be revealed and it is up to the police to bring the poster in. Most likely "family" were evicted because they are drug users, Raye is a cruel landlord or some other reason.

    4. Re:More evidence that people are cruel... by seebs · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it's up to the police. Sounds like it might be best addressed as a civil matter.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    5. Re:More evidence that people are cruel... by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      I would think it would be both. The person responsible should be punished criminally and be forced to compensate the landlord for the damages civilly. If the culprit was the evicted tenant, this would be no different from a civil perspective from any other pissed off tenant that damages the property before they leave. I'm sure it happens all the time.

    6. Re:More evidence that people are cruel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What really is lame is that since the former tenant was family the police are calling it a family feud

      So, if the landlady shoots her former tenent, that's OK too? I mean, it's just a family feud...

      I RTFA; actually twice, since the story was reprinted in other papers too. Nowhere did either one I read say the tenant was family, nor that the cops wouldn't do anything.

      Moderators, the parent is NOT informative, unless Mr. AC can provide us with a link to a FA that actually says what he alledges.

      -mcgrew

    7. Re:More evidence that people are cruel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep reading. You will see that the former tenant was indeed the landlord's sister. And the police are doing nothing about the "family feud." See King TV's coverage for the latest.

    8. Re:More evidence that people are cruel... by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      What really is lame is that since the former tenant was family the police are calling it a family feud. Thus, they won't issue the subpoena to Craigslist so that the lady can try and press criminal charges. Which basically means since the cops won't help her, she probably wouldn't even win in a civil courtroom. She'll never be able to prove who made the post without the police - and thus the crime will go unpunished.


      This would all be true if it weren't possible for litigants in a civil case to secure subpoenas and for civil cases to be initiated against unknown defendants. Its no uncommon for civil cases against anonymous internet posters to be filed against a "John Doe" defendant, then the plaintiff issues a subpoena against either an ISP or a forum host to get information from which the anonymous poster can be better identified, and then revising the claim to target the appropriate specific defendant.

      So, no, the absence of criminal prosecution does not mean she can't get the records in the course of a civil suit.
    9. Re:More evidence that people are cruel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What really is lame is that since the former tenant was family the police are calling it a family feud. Thus, they won't issue the subpoena to Craigslist so that the lady can try and press criminal charges. Which basically means since the cops won't help her, she probably wouldn't even win in a civil courtroom. She'll never be able to prove who made the post without the police - and thus the crime will go unpunished. That's smart - police just are going to leave this door wide open.

      This type of behavior from the police is typical. I had a neighbor caught on security camera footage stealing a bunch of equipment, but because the police viewed it as a "neighborhood feud" (primarily because I got a restraining order against him and his wife) they wouldn't do anything. It's all about the paperwork. I was told that unless the guy confesses, they wouldn't do anything. Of course the fucking meth addict wouldn't confess. You'll find lazy corrupt police anywhere.

  13. Similar offers have appeared that were legit by xC0000005 · · Score: 1

    In the past there have been similar offers from people getting rid of demolishing their houses. Heck, Habitat for Humanity helped strip some houses being demolished for a mall (and they did a really, really good job, all the long lumber recovered). Still remember "Apartment full of free stuff", which was in fact real - note the condition of the stuff wasn't mentioned.

    --
    www.voiceofthehive.com - Beekeeping and Honeybees for those who don't.
    1. Re:Similar offers have appeared that were legit by jcr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe I'm just not a trusting soul, but it seems to me that if I were a demolition contractor, I'd require a meeting with the client to show me his ID and the deed to the building before I'd accept the job. I know that in Santa Cruz county (California) at least, you have to get a permit for that kind of work. I'd be surprised if that's not the case in most of the USA.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    2. Re:Similar offers have appeared that were legit by khallow · · Score: 1

      I guess there's nothing like free stuff to magically plant trust in the soul. Besides how many of these people had a clue about how demolitions are supposed to work or that golly, you can't just take stuff just because some stranger (or some ad) says it's ok? The Habitat for Humanity folk for sure would know, but the average joe not so much.

    3. Re:Similar offers have appeared that were legit by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Damned right. Prove you own this house and prove ou want it demolished or raided or whatever. DEMAND PROOF. With proof, you're far less liable.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  14. on top of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of renters do not understand what it is to be a landlord or landlady. They want all the benefits but none of the responsibility. The next time you rent a new place don't worry too much about if you meet their standards. They should be just as subject to background checks as the potential renters. Make sure to get references from them at least.

    1. Re:on top of that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, you see the thing is if the house is awesome, but the landlords are fuckwads you can't just go and look for other landlords. houses and landlords are a package deal, whereas with tenants there is no package. that's why there are some many fuckwad landlords with nice properties, because people will put up with their shit in order to not live in a dump

  15. That sounds like something I saw by aussie_a · · Score: 3, Funny

    That sounds like a Craiglist ad I saw, except that one was real. I know because I went there and took the plasma television. Funny how two ads can be placed on the same site saying the same thing, even in the same area.

    1. Re:That sounds like something I saw by Some_Llama · · Score: 2, Funny

      WTF?!?! That was you?!? That ad was a fake and you stole _MY_ TV!!!

      Please return it asap, I have moved though, so you will need to bring it to my new address, no hard feelings if you hurry.

  16. There's more to this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to several different news agencies such as Fox, AP, etc, the tenant was the woman's sister. The victim evicted her sister. According to one article the police stated that it is a civil mater, a not criminal one.

    (http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_040507 WABcraigslistadLJ.34e92f1d.html).

    I think that the reaction of most is that a case could be made for a criminal charges however the full details are not out yet. We'll have to wait and see what emerges.

  17. All I want to know is by zappepcs · · Score: 1

    how this will be translated into some sort of attempt to regulate craig's list entries to ensure that the children are safe and no copyrights are infringed or something like that. If YouTube is being sued to police the content on their site, shouldn't Craig's List police their site too?

    Call me cynical but I just know someone is going to try this lame kind of reasoning to enact more laws we don't need...

    1. Re:All I want to know is by cli_rules! · · Score: 1
      Cut-n-pasted from the Avoiding Scams section of craigslist: (http://www.craigslist.org/about/scams.html)

      Recognizing scams

      Most scams involve one or more of the following:

      * inquiry from someone far away, often in another country
      * Western Union, Money Gram, cashier's check, money order, shipping, escrow service, or a "guarantee"
      * inability or refusal to meet face-to-face before consumating transaction (emphasis added)
      IANAL, but policing their posts would cost them way too much money, in the form of liability insurance plus the added cost of manpower. Not trivial.
  18. unlocked doors is irrelevant by ayeco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It doesn't matter if the door was unlocked, it's still considered theft. You can leave you keys in you car and the thief will still get charged with grand theft auto - though you insurance company might not cover it.

    1. Re:unlocked doors is irrelevant by Sancho · · Score: 1

      With a car, you have to transfer the title. A better example would be a bicycle with a sign on it which read, "Free bicycle to a good home."

    2. Re:unlocked doors is irrelevant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a car, you have to transfer the title. A better example would be a bicycle with a sign on it which read, "Free bicycle to a good home."
      Or a sign on the back of a young woman which reads, "Rape me." Hey she could just be playing out her fantasy, can't take a chance, fuck her good.
  19. All guilty... by evilviper · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Just because there was an ad on craigs list, doesn't absolve people from breaking and entering, stealing property, etc. This doesn't lie entirely on the shoulders of the instigator. You could do the same thing just as easily by putting up a sign, or standing outside of a random (empty) house and telling people to take everything.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:All guilty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > doesn't absolve people from breaking and entering

      And what does that have to do with this story? No one is accused of breaking and entering.

    2. Re:All guilty... by Sparr0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree. Most theft statutes require intent. By making the post, the poster effectively stole all of the items from the woman and then gave them away. That people had to come get them is a technicality. They are surely guilty of receiving/possessing stolen goods, but imho they aren't guilty of theft.

    3. Re:All guilty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To break and enter you have to BREAK and enter. I.e., the door has to be locked or otherwise secured to prevent entry. According to the article, the door was not locked.

    4. Re:All guilty... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. Theft is theft, "Cletus told me to do it" doesn't absolve you of the crime. The idea of that is ridiculous and untenable.

    5. Re:All guilty... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK, sure, Cletus told me to do it isn't a good defense, but...

      "Cletus told me that he owned it, and that I could take it. Furthermore, he told me in a forum where such offers are not uncommonly made, where offers for such services as one night stands are often solicited, and where completely fraudulent offers are commonly listed with no detection or tagging methods" sounds pretty good.

    6. Re:All guilty... by AndrewRUK · · Score: 1, Informative
    7. Re:All guilty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, if the door was unlocked then how can you be done with breaking and entering?

      If there is no force involved then you can't be done with entering - merely simple theft.

    8. Re:All guilty... by AndrewRUK · · Score: 2, Funny

      And, dear slashdotters, that post is an example of why the preview button was invented...

    9. Re:All guilty... by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      In this case, Cletus would be the one guilty of theft as he has effectively stolen the property from its rightful owner and given it away to you. So as long as you think the property was rightfully Cletuses to give away, you have committed no crime, if you find out later that it wasn't Cletuses, you have to return it or you are then receiving stolen goods.

    10. Re:All guilty... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if you have a key you're immune from prosecution for theft? I'd like to know which law school you graduated from so I make sure I don't go there. I'm not intending to be a lawyer anyways, but you can't bne too careful.

    11. Re:All guilty... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      "Cleatus done gone told me to go steal that stuff" isn't a defense, no. "Cleatus sold me his old car. Oh, it wasn't his car? He swore it was." could very well be, though. You still have no claim to the property; it wasn't Cleatus' to sell. However, you were, possibly, acting 'in good faith' and aren't actually guilty of any wrongdoing.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    12. Re:All guilty... by happyemoticon · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that you could prove this in court, but it's my totally unfounded opinion that no upright human being could look at such a craigslist ad and not think, "Huh, that sounds too good to be true." The people who did not come to the house were the ones who either decided they didn't want to, or, worse, decided that it must be a prank or scam. The ones who came were engaged in an act of self-deception, because they stood to benefit from it, they weren't the ones being screwed, and they had a half-assed excuse as to why they did it.

      Either that, or they're stupid as a bored. Come on. You have to be pretty fucking naive to believe that you can get anything for free. So it isn't "Cleatus sold me his old car. Oh, it wasn't his car? He swore it was," it's, "I had a strong suspicion that something funny was going on, but I did something I suspected was wrong anyway because I stood to benefit from it."

      This isn't really a legal rant, it's a social one. But fortunately there is such a thing as social justice, and you can, and should, ostracize your 'friends' when they do something which is morally repugnant and shady. After all, the next one to get fucked over could be you.

    13. Re:All guilty... by Sparr0 · · Score: 1

      I have seen craigslist ads as broad as this one that were legit. Entire barns and garages full of furniture and other bulky items free for the taking, with the owner* present. There are companies that do constant business doing nothing but removing old fixtures and furniture from rental properties, their customers could just as easily post on craiglist. I would not be incredulous in the slightest if I saw this ad, even after having read this story.

      * - proof of ownership being occupation of the house attached to the garage or adjacent to the barn. could have been a neighbor or leaseholder, but since it wasnt reported as theft i take the proof to be vindicated in hindsight.

  20. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No no no, you have it all wrong. If you REALLY want to cause them grief, don't post the pic on any of those places until you've spammed it to /b/ a few times!* =)

    *Warning: Above link is VERY NSFW most times

  21. It's ambiguous by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article says it was her home that was vandalized. It also says she had recently evicted a rental tenant but it does not state that the vacated apartment was the one that was struck. It may be that the tenant posted the landlord's home address rather than the property he was evicted from. Or perhaps both the landlord and the ex-tenant lived in the same building and both apartments were hit. The article is not very clear on this point, but calling it her "home" strongly implies it's where she personally resided.

    1. Re:It's ambiguous by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 1

      It also implies there's more to the story than is written here. I suspect her insurance company will be most interested in getting those Craigslist records.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  22. I grew up a landlord's son by toadlife · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I bet my tenant horror stories much more horrifying than your landlord horror stories. Being a landlord, especially one with multiple properties tends to turn the nicest people into complete assholes.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    1. Re:I grew up a landlord's son by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is part of why I'm opposed to the whole landlord/renter relationship. Any codified system that, by its nature, promotes enmity and hatred in a community, is a bad idea that ought to be considered long and hard.
      Alternatives would be difficult, but not impossible, to implement. Instead of hating on landlords (like most of the posts here on slashdot) people should be looking at the system itself, and where it comes from.

        As a landlord, you're the (innocent) inheritor of a long legacy leading back to the first guy with a shiny hat and a bunch of thugs to walk into a village and say "everything here belongs to me now. You'll all give me a share of everything you make and own, or my toadies here will put sharp bits of metal into your kidneys." * And thus was born the first government, king, landlord, tax, and rent, all in one. (This is a bit of a parable. It's a little more complicated, but relax, it's only slashdot.)

        These days it's been watered down -- the original bullies got too big, hired sub-bullies called 'earls' and 'barons', got worried by the sub-bullies' kingly aspirations and took away their toadies, created a less dangerous (for him) group of toadies called 'police', farmed out the task of collecting on properties (by selling them) to private merchants, and separated the collection of the loot into 'tax' and 'rent', etc..

        The pyramid of power got larger and larger, and the rewards for the people lower down get smaller and smaller. (As someone noted, most modern landlords are lucky not to lose their shirt.) The modern landlord keeps a lot less than his feudal ancestor did when he was backed by his own standing army, but it's still the same system at heart. He's just stuck in an informal spot on the bottom end of the bully's team. This means he gets all the crap from above, and is also an easier target so he also gets all the crap from below. (Tenants are often angry at a lot more than just the landlord, but it's so much harder to take it out on the taxman.)
        The government keeps a lot of laws that help renters primarily because the first rule of bullying is if too many of the bullied get pissed off at once, you're in trouble. There's always more of them than bullies, so that pyramid can get upended pretty quickly. And who cares if some landlords get screwed? They're not numerous enough to overthrow squat, and (mostly) not rich enough to listen to.

        It's a system that turns two people against each other, filling them with suspicion and distrust, and thereby poisoning society as a whole.

      * (This legacy is a big part of the reason for people hating on landlords -- it's a kind of cultural memory of giving all your money and half your grain to the Duke and his men when they came calling.)

        - mantar

    2. Re:I grew up a landlord's son by khallow · · Score: 1

      It's simpler than that. We have human beings with a conflict of interest. I really don't see the need for some complicated theory to explain this. I've never had a bad relationship with a landlord. And I've rented for the past 15 years from nine different parties. My take as a renter is that the system is just fine as long as you hold up your end of the contract and you take some care in chosing who you rent from.

    3. Re:I grew up a landlord's son by PMuse · · Score: 1

      If nothing else, bad tenant stories are more fun to listen to than bad landlord stories. For one thing, the landlord story-teller tends to have more stories to choose from. For another, all the listeners can look down their mental noses are the bad tenant and think, "At least I don't live like _those_ people!"

      Listening to a bad landlord story always makes me relive the times I've been short-changed by landlords in the past -- and done nothing.

      --
      "We reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals." --The American President (20.1.2009)
    4. Re:I grew up a landlord's son by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      You describe one of the reasons why the U.S. encourages people to own their own homes and properties; it's a technique to minimize a landowning class.

      Unfortunatly, "rent" is starting to creep back in where I live, because many homeowners still need to pay condo and neighborhood fees.

      Where I live, it's often cheaper to rent because the landlord takes care of all of the maintenance; it's a valuable service that makes the rent more valuable then a morgage payment.

    5. Re:I grew up a landlord's son by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Luckily where I live home owners associations are nowhere in sight.

      That said, even in areas where the cost of maintaining a property might be high, I don't see how you can argue that renting is cheaper than buying. When you rent, all of the money you are paying to the landlord is going into another person's captial investment. With a home, at least a portion of the money you are paying into your mortgage goes back in your pocket in the form of equity - much moreso if you choose to pay extra into the principal every month. Maintenance costs of a home, while they seem draining, are still not a waste, as they maintain the value of your property, which help maintain and/or increase your equity. Except in the case of severe real estate market declines (which are rare) where prices actually go down, when you decide to move onto a different house, you will almost always make a profit.

      I suppose if you insisted on hiring a handyman/contractor to do *all* maintenance work on your house, instead of doing some of it yourself, mortgage+maintenance costs might be more expensive than renting for an equivalent property, but you still have that capital investment that is non-exoistant with renting.

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    6. Re:I grew up a landlord's son by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      That said, even in areas where the cost of maintaining a property might be high, I don't see how you can argue that renting is cheaper than buying. When you rent, all of the money you are paying to the landlord is going into another person's captial investment.

      Don't make the mistake that your formula for success works every time.

      It's very simple, really. Where I live, the condos and homes are much, much, much nicer then my apartment. The maintence costs, fees, taxes, ect, are about 60-80% of what I currently pay for rent. If I were to buy a property, I'd have to stay there for at least five years in order for it to be worth it.

      Read that above paragraph again. Did you comprehend it? Good. To put it bluntly, a mortgage (and other costs) are about double my rent!

      If I buy a home of any kind, I'm locked into my job for at least five years. Considering that my job is making me go crazy, I'm much better off going back to school, starting a business, buying "risk", ect.

    7. Re:I grew up a landlord's son by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Well if you don't have confidence in being at the same or comparable job for five years I can understand your trepidation, but I wouldn't discount the long term value in real estate investment in the future. I watched my mother aquire, rent and sell over a dozen properties throughout my childood, and now retired from the landlord business, she has two homes, both of which are paid for that she would not otherwise be able to afford on her job income today.

      You mentioned that homes in your area are much nicer than your apartment. Is it possible to move slightly away to find a home, or do you live a huge metro area?

      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    8. Re:I grew up a landlord's son by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      You mentioned that homes in your area are much nicer than your apartment. Is it possible to move slightly away to find a home, or do you live a huge metro area?

      Well, I don't like giving out personal information on a public message board! (But yes, real estate is expensive where I live.)

      Let's just say that I think there's more to life then getting up every day to go to a job to pay a mortgage. If I buy a home, I'm forcing myself to have a livelihood that I don't enjoy. I'm currently in a position that Brahm Cohen was in when he decided to quit his job to write BitTorrent. I'm sick of having people tell me where to spend my creative energies.

      Basically, I'm better off investing in furthering my career then buying a house. Certainly you can understand that some things in life are more valuable then owning a home? I'm sure I'll be able to afford one once I've put my career where I want it.

    9. Re:I grew up a landlord's son by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      Oh, and I forgot to mention that most of the properties where I live have a $200 monthly fee; either as a condo fee or property fee. By taking in an occasional roommate, what I spend on "rent" is comparable to paying a condo/property fee and replacing major appliances as they die.

    10. Re:I grew up a landlord's son by toadlife · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't like giving out personal information on a public message board! Well then you probably should pay the extra couple of bucks for privacy when you register your domain! :D
      --
      I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
  23. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    s the first 5 seconds of a film uploaded to beasttube.com,
     
    beasttube.... ehwwwww....

  24. Unfortunately too common by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I know several people who've been abused through Craigslist -- unfortunately it just proves too tempting an environment for assholes. One friend had his garage pretty much cleaned out (bikes, tools, etc) from a posting on Craigslist saying he was moving and was offering it all free to people who would pick it up.

    One friend had her phone number posted when she turned down a second date from some jerk and he posted an ad claiming she wanted men to call her up and tell her how they'd use her -- she was VERY freaked out until I figured out what had happened and got the post removed, then she debated changing her number because guys were calling at 2am and waking her up but I set her up with ringtone groups for which anyone not in the phonebook would get a silent ring. Then she just had to delete dirty voicemails for a few more weeks until the fun wore off and the guys realized she was never calling back.

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    1. Re:Unfortunately too common by pongo000 · · Score: 1

      I know several people who've been abused through Craigslist -- unfortunately it just proves too tempting an environment for assholes. One friend had his garage pretty much cleaned out (bikes, tools, etc) from a posting on Craigslist saying he was moving and was offering it all free to people who would pick it up.

      Sorry to be pendactic here, but I don't believe your friend was "abused through Craigslist." Instead, he was abused by the lowlife thieves that stole his property.

      This isn't a Craigslist problem. This is a social problem. Every one of those individuals that ripped off your friend should have been prosecuted for theft.

    2. Re:Unfortunately too common by NMerriam · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be pendactic here, but I don't believe your friend was "abused through Craigslist." Instead, he was abused by the lowlife thieves that stole his property.


      Well, he was abused by both. There's no necessity that blame be laid solely at the feet of the folks who took stuff (I don't put any blame on craigslist itself, just the jerk who posted the ad).
      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    3. Re:Unfortunately too common by benzapp · · Score: 1

      Craigslist gives the illusion of anonymity that is just too strong for the average nitwit.

      What if Craigslist did something like gmail does for new accounts? Use a text message to verify a cell phone account. 99% of users would understand at that point it is NOT anonymous and they might make better choices.

      It is the fault of craigslist in they make it too easy for assholes to sign up.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
    4. Re:Unfortunately too common by khallow · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be pedantic here (hubba hubba), but he was abused by both. If it weren't for the Craigslist ad, the lowlifes wouldn't have bothered him. I think in most places it is a crime to incite someone to criminal acts.

      And when it comes to getting free stuff, some peoples' rational facilities get impaired. Craigslist will probably have to put up warnings that one needs to verify a trade before they haul things off like those dumb warnings on lamp cords in the US and such.
    5. Re:Unfortunately too common by AmiAthena · · Score: 1

      Sorry to be pendactic here, but I don't believe your friend was "abused through Craigslist." Instead, he was abused by the lowlife thieves that stole his property. Actually I think it would be correct to say that he was abused through craigslist, by the person who made the fraudulent post, by AND through the lowlife thieves. "Through" indicates how or where it happened; "by" indicates who did it. ("I was threatened through the mail by a crazed stalker.") In this case the people who took the stuff were both how the abuse took place, since the person who posted the ad used them to accomplish the victimization, and who performed the physical taking of property. Of course the ad-poster would be the other who, without whom the taking wouldn't have happened. Craigslist is where and the other how. Which makes it mostly a social problem, but not entirely.

      All of this brings up an interesting question... am I guilty of being ironically pedantic if I point out that "pendactic" isn't a word?
    6. Re:Unfortunately too common by AmiAthena · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I typed that up and then fell asleep before I hit submit. I see now that I'm not the only one to pick up on those points. Darn.

  25. Mod me down by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    This user wants to be modded down. Please mod him/her down.

  26. Re:Ha Ha Ha by Broken+scope · · Score: 1

    Your assuming the person was bright enough to cover their tracks at all.

    --
    You mad
  27. In some states YOU will get charged by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In some border states it's illegal to leave your keys in the car.

  28. Well, if you believe in such things.. by ankarbass · · Score: 1

    ..it seems the karma wheel bit her in the butt. I mean, she did just evict someone. I suppose the evictee would my first suspect. But, who knows, maybe they're not that dumb.

    --
    Wanted: Clever sig, top $ paid, all offers considered.
    1. Re:Well, if you believe in such things.. by dgbrownnt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't say karma, per se, since the tenant most likely had it coming (it's very difficult to evict someone without a reason). It's just a biproduct of property management that you make enemies. When your tenant become a liability and/or breaks there contract, it's a business decision to you, but it's a home decision to them.

    2. Re:Well, if you believe in such things.. by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1
      I've known some landlords who were badly mistreated, and I've known (and been) some tenants who've been badly mistreated. In most states, the law gives evictees lots of protection that they can heavily abuse. Since eviction is a legal procedure and this revenge is not, the presumption must be that the revenger is at fault.

      Furthermore, a property owner has far more to lose and is much more likely to be a responsible person than a renter.

      --
      Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
    3. Re:Well, if you believe in such things.. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Karma? So kicking someone out is automatically a dick move? For all you know, this was some pacific heights terror chopping up the place or someone who hasn't paid rent in months. Ya just don't know.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    4. Re:Well, if you believe in such things.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..it seems the karma wheel bit her in the butt. I mean, she did just evict someone

      I totally agree. I don't know anything about why the previous tenant was evicted (this is slashdot), but obviously evicting someone is totally a bad thing to do and aginst human rights and unconstitutional and probably racist too. So what if they hadn't paid their rent for six months? Hey, If someone owns an apartment why do they need the income? So what if they constantly played loud music at all hours and drove several other good tenatnts away - they're just dumbass squares with, like , jobs, you know.


      Idiot. You'd cry like a fucking baby if it happened to you. Waaaagh, it's not fair!!!!!

    5. Re:Well, if you believe in such things.. by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Actually you do know. Eviction is tightly regulated to prevent landlords from tossing people easily. Usually, when someone stops paying there are 2-3 court dates that have to pass before you can even get a constable out to the residence to remove the person. This can take upwards of 3 months in some places due to court caseloads.

      Add to that the fact that many landlords will give the transgressing tennant up to 90 days to catch up and you are probably looking at half a year to remove someone from propery that YOU OWN. Meanwhile they are probably trashing the place.

      If you add it up, lawyer fees, past due rent, and dammage to the property, it is easy to see how a tennant can royally screw a landlord. If someone is the "victim" of eviction they really had to do something to get into that position becuase the process is not easy.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
  29. post a new ad? by tilde_e · · Score: 3, Funny

    Has the victim tried to post a new ad asking for her stuff back? The lost+found section?

    1. Re:post a new ad? by gfreeman · · Score: 1

      Yes, she gave her new address and said that she'd leave the doors unlocked and would people please just let themselves in and leave stuff.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
  30. When I read this I thought... by cdw38 · · Score: 1

    The title made it sound like someone posted a fake Craigslist ad, pissed off the wrong person who proceeded to find out where the fake poster lived, and then robbed that person. Kinda disappointing it was just some numbnuts who keeps their door unlocked.

  31. What is wrong with people? by phulegart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's see. Brief Synopsis of a great deal of the replies here...

    1: She was an Evil landlord. She evicted someone. She deserved it.
    2: Karma returned to her what she deserved.
    3: It was a rental property. She can afford to replace everything.
    4: She left the property unlocked. She deserved what she got.
    5: Crime is nothing new. This is nothing new. Laugh all you want.

    WTF people? IF and WHEN something like this happens to you, you will change your tune VERY quickly. What does it say about the state of people today when the biggest mouths all laugh at someone's misfortune, writing it off to just be "Life". People who engage at finding entertainment in the misery of others, are the ones responsible for continuing the misery of others.

    Sure it could happen (and probably has) with regular old paper classifieds. That doesn't make it OK. People in the Tacoma area that read this (and those here on /. especially) should be donating everything they can to help this woman out. It doesn't matter if she is rich beyond means, or if she needs to rent this property to keep from being homeless. Pranks and acts of vandalism like this are not funny. At all.

    --
    "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
    1. Re:What is wrong with people? by Mr2001 · · Score: 2

      People in the Tacoma area that read this (and those here on /. especially) should be donating everything they can to help this woman out. Um.. isn't that her insurance company's job?
      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    2. Re:What is wrong with people? by renimar · · Score: 1
      What's wrong with people? This kind of behaviour has been around so long, that a word's been invented to describe it. And just to show that musicals apply to every situation in life, here's the beginning of a song for that word from the musical Avenue Q:

      GARY COLEMAN:
      Right now you are down and out and feeling really crappy

      NICKY:
      I'll say.

      GARY COLEMAN:
      And when I see how sad you are It sort of makes me... Happy!

      NICKY:
      Happy?!

      GARY COLEMAN:
      Sorry, Nicky, human nature- Nothing I can do! It's... Schadenfreude! Making me feel glad that I'm not you!

      --
      In other news, Microsoft Windows users are now covered under the Americans with Disabilties Act...
    3. Re:What is wrong with people? by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

      WTF people? IF and WHEN something like this happens to you, you will change your tune VERY quickly.

      Indeed. (And your point #3 especially galls me, being a landlord is not the same as being rich. In fact, it's a pretty easy way to lose your shirt if you aren't careful and a little lucky. I know - I've been a landlord.)
    4. Re:What is wrong with people? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      >Um.. isn't that her insurance company's job?

      So... all you have to do to get an insurance claim paid is to do sometging incite people to steal or destroy your stuff...

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    5. Re:What is wrong with people? by davmoo · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Looking at your number, you're apparently fairly new here. So let me help you.

      One of the basic rules in the Slashdot community is its not a crime unless someone has violated the GPL. Anyone who violates the GPL should be boiled in oil, burned at the stake, and then hanged, in that order.

      Its okay to violate any other laws, so long as you think you did it for a good reason. And its especially cool to rip off the IP of large corporations (unless the corporation is Apple), although that doesn't apply in this particular case. Anyone who violates laws that do not involve the GPL should be set free immediately so that we can make them in to a hero.

      --
      I want a new quote. One that won't spill. One that don't cost too much. Or come in a pill.
    6. Re:What is wrong with people? by DaMattster · · Score: 1
      • 1: She was an Evil landlord. She evicted someone. She deserved it.
      • 2: Karma returned to her what she deserved.
      • 3: It was a rental property. She can afford to replace everything.
      • 4: She left the property unlocked. She deserved what she got.
      • 5: Crime is nothing new. This is nothing new. Laugh all you want.

      How do you know that she was evil? Imagine if that had been your property and your tenant was delinquent on the rent? When the tables are turned, suddenly it does not appear so evil anymore. Also, the Fair Housing Acts prevent someone from being evicted until all legal means of collecting rent money have been exhausted. Also, unless you are a corporation, property maintenance is very expensive. There is nothing funny about this and if it had happened to you, I don't think you'd be laughing. You only know one side of the story so before you go ahead and commit libel, make certain you know the whole story. Also, try and have a little understanding, you may be in that same place one day.

    7. Re:What is wrong with people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A conservative is a liberal whose house has been broken into.

    8. Re:What is wrong with people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you should read the parent, "Let's see. Brief Synopsis of a great deal of the replies here..." those numbers were the view of the other comments, not his feelings or thoughts, and if you read the rest of the comment, he doesn't agree with them...

    9. Re:What is wrong with people? by khallow · · Score: 1

      Tragedy is when I cut my finger. Comedy is when you walk into an open sewer and die. - Mel Brooks

    10. Re:What is wrong with people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Half the comments on slashdot are based on peoples' inability to read the thing to which they are replying. It is time for a "-1 (Poor Reading Comprehension)" mod option.

    11. Re:What is wrong with people? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      4: She left the property unlocked. She deserved what she got.

      That's such a poisonous 'blame-the-victim' attitude. Nobody deserves to have their property stolen because something wasn't locked. You can keep going up that slippery slope until everybody deserves to have everything stolen because they aren't in a bunker, lack a moat, and lack armed guards.

      Seriously, if I want to break into a house, I'm breaking a window. That doesn't reflect poorly on the homeowner for wanting a bit of daylight.

      Obviously, in this case, the criminals were duped. But in a real case, maximum prosecution would help to deter crime. The amount of money people spend on security systems thousands of times over instead of properly funding their police department and fostering a sense of community is saddening.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    12. Re:What is wrong with people? by infosinger · · Score: 1

      Taking this 'blame-the-victim' philosophy one step further. I deserve to get mugged if I don't carry a gun.

    13. Re:What is wrong with people? by phulegart · · Score: 1

      looking at your response, you're apparently an idiot. So let me help you.

      One of the basic rules in the GLOBAL community is that a crime is a crime, regardless of whether or not a bunch of loud-mouthed over-protected geeks find it amusing. Anyone who decides that they should have thought of a harmful prank first, because it was very funny to them should be burned in a multitude of ways.

      It's not OK to violate other laws, regardless of what you think, especially if violating those laws hurts other people.

      You are a moron, albeit a sarcastic one who panders to the crowd at large. Your assumption about my being new here is based on the incorrect correlation between the number of posts I have made, and the amount of time that MUST mean that I have been making them. I've been participating in /. discussions since 1998 or 1999, when I was running an internet cafe in New Orleans. I just floated between using a different logon than THIS one, posting Anon, and posting on a good friend's account.

      The fact that so many people read this and decided to make a joke out of it, and especially those who wished THEY had done this first, only proves how the Slashdot community has DEGRADED over the years. Your response further proves that very same thing.

      --
      "I love deadlines. I love the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." -D. Adams
  32. Re:Whatever... by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

    You have a broken sense of propriety.

  33. Re:Been there, almost by Kannaida · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A great prank/revenge?!!? Are you fracking kidding me?!?! The tenant was evicted... which TYPICALLY means said tenant didn't own up to their bills or violated some sort of agreement signed when they moved in. I'm sorry, but in no way is stealing a "great prank". Particularly when it involves stealing things like the hot water heater and kitchen sink, things which, without, the home is now completely worthless. You need to seriously rethink what you consider a prank. If it's your buddies calling your girlfriend, you'll pay up in your own hell... but you need to consider the collateral damage. In this case, it's going to cost this lady thousands of dollars. And YOU consider it a good prank? When was the last time you spent thousands of dollars just to pull off a prank (and if you had, where do you work, I could use a job like that)? This isn't funny.... this is the kind of thing that causes fear in our society for people who don't have the means to support themselves. It's the "good" thing to think, "Hey, they're a little down on their luck, let me help". And I really do like to think that way, but it's stories like this that make me think, "They're not down on their luck, they're just out to screw someone." As for the people who went in and took stuff... c'mon people! Use a little common sense! Should Craig's List require a subpoena? Of course! But that doesn't make what happened any better. You've got one imbecile who's mad because (s)he can't pay their debts, and then a bunch of other people who are just, apparently, waiting to prey on a CLEARLY false opportunity. If you're the kind of person who reads that add and thinks "the hot water heater MUST be okay to take" then I've got this great bridge in Brooklyn to sell you. Think of all the money you can make on tolls! It even has a pedestrian walkway! Real cheap, but act fast, the bids keep coming in! Seriously... THINK about anything you see on the internet. This is supposed to be such an advanced society what with our acceptance of technology, and all this shows is that we're too stupid to filter out the crap. If anyone here fell for that add, it's a wonder you're not broke for buying EVERYTHING you see on a T.V. commercial. A good general rule of thumb is if it looks too good to be true, it probably is, and you should do a little research before you sink your time and/or money into it. If you don't believe that, quit your job and go do the "clearly" higher paying job they offer on T.V. to "work from home" and "make millions of dollars". I really expect more from society. I like to think that as information becomes more prevalent, people become more wary... Clearly I'm being too optimistic. Time to call my folks and make sure they're not doing something stupid...

  34. Posted an ad like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've posted an ad like this at craigslist before but it was my garage. I even told people not to make too much noise as I wanted to sleep in till 10am. When I woke up, most of it was gone and some nice guys actually took the pile of rotted wood I would have had to haul to the dump!
    This is why I don't place any blame on the people taking stuff.

  35. so? by GroeFaZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I grew up in the town where the Angel of Death was born and raised. Do we have to drive around in APCs instead of regular cars and sleep in bullet-proof vests? Well, no. So unless you could name a mechanism by which Tacoma makes people dangerous (except that it's a town in the USA), that's not exactly a reasonable argument. I don't question the conclusion of locking the door, but maybe the rationale behind it is more than "we had a couple real bad guys born here". Anecdotal evidence only goes so far.

    --
    The grass is always greener on the other side of the light cone.
  36. I had the opposite happen by Reziac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    During college I lived in what was called the "fruit section" of Bozeman MT, not only because of the street names (Plum, Avocado, Peach, etc.) but also because of the numbers of just plain fruity people living there. Anyway, one day I opened my garage (which was well off the street) to discover a bunch of stuff I didn't recognise had magically appeared -- a set of wheels, a kitchen stove, misc. household goods, garden tools, etc. Didn't appear to be dumped, stolen, nor broken. Landlord said it wasn't his stuff either. I never did find out where it came from.

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:I had the opposite happen by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      ...a set of wheels, a kitchen stove, misc. household goods,... Either that was the smallest stove in the world, or you have a garbage can fit for Paul Bunyan.
      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    2. Re:I had the opposite happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Garage mate, not garbage can :)

    3. Re:I had the opposite happen by maxume · · Score: 1

      Too bad he said garage.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:I had the opposite happen by networkBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had someone empty out my storage locker at one of those self storage places, then put it all back. Only thing broken was a floor lamp. (different locks and all).
      All I can figure is that someone hired a moving company and told them they didn't have the keys anymore, thus the company just cut the lock. I wonder who shit a bigger pile when they showed up with all the wrong stuff . . . the homeowner or the moving company?

      I had tons of old computer stuff and as far as I could tell, nothing was missing. The fact it was in storage, however, should give an idea of its relative usefulness.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:I had the opposite happen by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1
      Well, he did say garage. Now, here in Alaska, our garbage cans tend to be the size of, and contain similar things to, normal folks' garages, but the OP was from Montana, a puny little windswept place where garages are likely to be just that.

      It's never a good idea to post before coffee. In emergency situations you can increase the font size in your browser....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  37. Inspired by movie plot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems to be a variation on a scene from a movie 20-30 years ago (forgot the name) where an ad is place in the papers for people to show up at a house for demolition, and to be paid supposedly afterwards.

    Anyone remember the movie?

    -Ann Coward, Toronto

  38. Re:Whatever... by philpalm · · Score: 1

    I would have to see the actual ad to determine if the scavengers are at fault for destroying that lady's rental. If the ad said feel free to enter and take what you want (no supervision) then the scavengers are liable for not using judgement in determining the validity of the ad.

    I think a judge will allow a search warrant for the perpetrators of this act of desruction/revenge/harm. In addition if the poster had a previous history of mischief then craigslist is also liable for paying damages.

    So it is not whatever, there is substancial damage over $10,000 and someone is liabel and will suffer the consequences. And if the person who caused the damage is a minor, the parents will be liable for letting their child run amok....

  39. Evicted tenant was her sister by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    Just thought it might put some perspective in this story. The cops aren't going to follow up on this. They are calling it a civil issue.

  40. 123 Main St. by quokkapox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Boy do I feel bad now for the poor schmuck who lives at 123 First St., Schenectady, NY 12345

    I've been signing them up for junk mail, spam, credit card offers, everything for years now.

    Holy shit, Google Maps says that that address actually exists.

    Sorry, dude.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:123 Main St. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The entirety of that zipcode is the GE plant located there.

    2. Re:123 Main St. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man, the same thing happened to me. Who knew that 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20500 was a real address?

    3. Re:123 Main St. by CrankyFool · · Score: 1

      Speaking as the guy who gets nosuchuser@nosuchdomain.com email (I'm serious), I can empathize with the hypothetical tenants of that address :)

    4. Re:123 Main St. by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      I guess somebody@gmail.com is really pissed too...

    5. Re:123 Main St. by sulfur · · Score: 3, Funny

      I try not to harm innocent people and use support@microsoft.com for such purposes.

    6. Re:123 Main St. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, so is abc@123.com

    7. Re:123 Main St. by Some_Llama · · Score: 1

      That's a good point, i'll start doing that in the future, i was just mad because _I_ wanted somebody@gmail.com!!

    8. Re:123 Main St. by GlacierDragon · · Score: 1

      You are my hero.

      --
      http://glacierdragon.smugmug.com - Check out my photos. No need to buy, even though I do need the money!
  41. That's an apartment building by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I live in 3B. We like the free pr0n, it's ... interesting.

  42. pwned by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    This is just so wrong that it's funny.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  43. The Criminal Justice System Is Represented By..... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1, Funny

    Law & Order = Ripped From The Headlines
    Law & Order: SVU = Ripped From The Pantylines
    Law & Order: CI: Ripped From Their Behinds

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  44. Re:The Most Important Data Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    How is identifying ethnicity (a fact) racist? lighten the fuck up.

  45. WTF? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    The woman easily suffered over $10,000 in damages and you're saying, "It's not so bad"?

    According to this article, it was her mother's house. Could have been the house that the lady grew up in.

    Shame on you for trivializing it.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    1. Re:WTF? by GarryOwen · · Score: 1

      Thank you, you described the real process of eviction. Currently I rent out two homes, and I can't believe the amount of crap people do to homes they don't own.

    2. Re:WTF? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      At this point, the landlord is out a minimum of one month of rent (it takes time for the wheels of justice to turn) and usually more, plus court costs, eviction costs, locksmith, movers, etc.

      Don't apartments in the US come with a safety deposit? No, the landlord can't just take money from it but it's there so damages can be recovered from it. Oh yeah and if he's an asshat the apartment is likely trashed on top of defaulting on his payments.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:WTF? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

      No problem. Most people have no clue how hard it is to be a landlord.

      Most new landlords are quickly humbled by their first "exception".

      Good for you for investing in real estate, though! You'll thank yourself when it's time to retire.

      --
      They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
    4. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Waaaaaaaaahhhhh. I've got more homes than I need and I can't find decent people to exploit so I whine and complain when things don't go my way... ...wah wah wah....landlording is sooooo hard.... ...wah....

      Obviously, you don't understand the karma wheel.

      I've only recently started renting again because a career change has me moving a lot. I used to own a home so I know how to take care of one. I always pay my rent on time, I always clean before I leave, I always give proper notice, I always leave the place in better shape than I found it.

      What have I learned about landlords.

      They are almost all liars.
      They are cheap and irresponsible when it comes to repairs that are their responsibility.
      They are seldom if ever on time when it comes to repairs that are their responsibility
      They do not respect the privacy of their tennants.
      They do not respect tennant laws until they realize that their tennants aren't stupid.

      In short, when the karma wheel bites you, remember, there was probably a good reason.

      If you don't like it, then stop doing it. It's a business and nobody cares about your costs, that's your problem. The risks are yours as well.

  46. You nailed it by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >WTF people? IF and WHEN something like this happens
    >to you, you will change your tune VERY quickly.

    Yep. Nobody is *really* a relativist. The coolest punk
    or the smarmiest professor turns positively Puritan
    when it's *their* stuff stolen, *their* face punched,
    *their* wife raped.

  47. Re:Been there, almost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    No a great prank is what I pulled on my asshat neighbors. they like to party, they like to have partys late at night and keep me up as well as the neighbors. So I build a nice big subwoofer in my back yard (which buts up near their house) and from 9:00am until 2:00pm I have a very high volume low frequency signal that is randomized (gotta love computers) that is played. this disrupts their sleep bretty bad as it's closer to their house with the crappy 1940's single pane windows, than mine that is all brick and new windows and I'ts very noticable inside the homes.

    I notified all the near neighbors that hate them and they all OK'ed it.
    Having a fenced yard, and burying it as well as aiming the ports to their house helped quite a bit.
    Nobody would have cared about their late night partying if the people they invite did not think laying on the horn and driving over people shrubs drunk was a cool and normal thing to do.

  48. My take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. At least some landlords are evil money-grubbing dickheads and slumlords. Yes, I've rented from them. I recently had a landlord who specialized in ripping off college kids. Out of six tenants in my building, he sued five of us. When I went to court, the judge told him that his rental contract was abusive and needed to be changed. As far as I know, he hasn't changed it.

    2. At least some tenants are evil uncaring assholes who destroy property, refuse to pay their rent, make the landlord go through a costly and slow eviction proceeding, and then disappear to pull the same crap someplace else.

    3. The trashing in question apparently stemmed from a family dispute. The owner's mother had lived in the house. When the mother died, the owner evicted her brother and sister. Current thinking is that one of them posted (or had someone post) the fake ad.

    4. IMHO, IANAL, a fake post on CraigsList doesn't give anyone legal authority to vandalize a house. The cops in Tacoma can be several miles short of worthless at times (they can't stop shootings on the Hilltop, prostitution pretty much everywhere downtown, etc) and so it doesn't surprise me that they won't get involved. I suspect that the homeowner would have a basis to sue the city of Tacoma for ignoring the issue. You can bet that if the home was owned by a city commissioner, cop, or well-connected businessman, the response would be different.

    5. Not all of Tacoma is fucked up, and it doesn't ALWAYS smell bad (often but not always.) Ruston is pretty nice, and you don't have to lock your doors if you live down on Salmon Beach. The Hilltop is fairly bad, and even South Tacoma is a little shaky although Steilacoom and Lakewood are decent.

    I'd personally pick Ruston if I HAD to live in Tacoma (or just move over to Gig Harbor.)

    1. Re:My take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...or just move over to Gig Harbor."

      You don't need to move to Gig Harbor. Gig Harbor moves to you. They're gobbling up chunks of unincorporated Pierce County like Hitler storming through eastern Europe.

  49. Re:The Most Important Data Ever by dwpro · · Score: 1

    I agree, it would only have been noteworthy to mention the ethnicity if it were a white crew, since we all know construction crews are made up of mainly Mexicans, or at least those of us that have worked construction for any amount of time.

    A little extra context never hurt anyone though, and I didn't even notice that the first time I read it through, and I am somewhat prejudiced myself. I would posit mentioning the race was more relevant to someone who considers himself to not be prejudiced, as it sure stirred you up.

    --
    Millions long for immortality who do not know what to do with themselves on a rainy Sunday afternoon. -- Susan Ertz
  50. WTF? by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 5, Informative
    The karma wheel did not bite her in the butt. The ex-tenant kicked her while she was down.

    Clearly, you do not understand what an eviction is, so let me help you. First of all, a landlord may not evict a tenant. In some jurisdictions, a landlord who evicts a tenant could go to jail. At any rate, he would certainly owe the tenant damages. Look up "constructive eviction" to see what I'm talking about.

    Here's how a real eviction works:
    1. Tenant violates his lease, generally by not paying his rent
    2. Landlord posts notice on the property to "Pay or Quit" (experienced landlords do this the minute rent is late.. beginning landlords let the tenant be late for a few months before acting). This means the tenant is given X number of days (number varies by jurisdiction) to pay rent or leave.
    3. Assuming tenant doesn't pay by day X, landlord sues tenant for possession of his property. A court date is set.
    4. Landlord goes in front of a judge and says why he's suing (tenant hasn't paid rent in 3 months, or whatever), and the tenant can present a defense ("I did pay, here are the canceled checks", or "No, I did not pay, but there was a legal reason for me not to pay and that reason is Y") and the judge decides what to do.
    5. Assuming the tenant had no legal defense, the judge will order the sheriff to evict the tenant.
    6. You set up a date with the sheriff for him to do the actual eviction.
    7. You show up with movers and a locksmith to meet the sheriff at the scheduled time.
    8. Locksmith opens the door (in case the tenant changed the locks) and then locksmith changes the locks.
    9. Sheriff removes the tenant from the building
    10. Movers move all the tenants prized possessions to the curb
    11. Scavengers take anything of value
    12. Garbage man takes the rest
    At this point, the landlord is out a minimum of one month of rent (it takes time for the wheels of justice to turn) and usually more, plus court costs, eviction costs, locksmith, movers, etc.

    In other words, if someone's getting evicted, it's for a darn good reason. It must be approved by a judge, and it costs money to do.

    As you can see, this lady got kicked while she was down.
    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  51. Re:Whatever... by amadeusb4 · · Score: 1

    How do you know that the apartment wasn't trashed by the evicted tenant, which is quite a common, and craigslist is just a tool for the landlord to recover that loss?

  52. Better late than never.... by madhatter256 · · Score: 0, Troll
    --
    Previewing comments are for sissies!
  53. Same here, to a lesser extent by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

    I've lived in Toronto for about two years now, and I come home to find shopping carts, piles of clothes, and small appliances on my front porch. While the shopping carts are annoying, the clothes and the appliances appear to be in good condition. Very strange people in this world.

    1. Re:Same here, to a lesser extent by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      Dude, that's my stuff. I was wondering where I left it. I'll be over today to pick it up.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    2. Re:Same here, to a lesser extent by Some_Llama · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is probably because you "think" you're living in a house when actually you're living in a walmart, the low wages just give the impression of not being paid.

  54. Missing the point by HikingStick · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't believe how many of my peers digress into banal discussions about evil landlords and evil tenants when examining a piece like this. I have my students do case studies every week. When they come across an interesting piece, like this one, that does not immediately seem related to networking or technology (the subjects I teach), I ask them to make the connection for me. That point of connection is usually the main point we, as tech professionals, can take away.

    In this case, it demonstrates a flaw in the Craigslist community--an honor-based system--that allows people to post for any address. If anyone can log on and post an ad that refers to any address (e.g. "Change of staff--new office holder wants to redecorate--take what you want from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave., Washington, D.C.), you might say "didn't see that coming" the first time, but you sure can anticipate the copycats. Think of what the credit card industry went through--once upon a time you could order and have something shipped anywhere. Now, you are mostly limited to shipping to your billing address. If Craigslist were my firm (and for the case studies, I ask my students to put themselves in that position), I would look at devising a way to limit posts to the verified address of a registered user only.

    Should Craigslist do this? That's their call. I'm just saying that instead of griping and moaning about bad landlords and rental experiences, we should look at an item like this and say "what can I learn from it." I would not want to risk even implied liability for my company by allowing such fraud to be propogated on my watch. Didn't online firms learn anything from that online check service that allowed anyone to register checking accounts without verifying their owners?

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    1. Re:Missing the point by belg4mit · · Score: 1

      What can we learn from it? That users are stupid. Who the hell would fall for this?
      Without bothering to ask the owner when showing up?

      As for Cragislist, your proposed changes would almost certainly drive away their users.

      Finally, the article was pretty damn wimpy, I got more details off my local news
      in Boston last night. It also seems inapproriate to quote a police officer who's unclear
      on what constitutes a scam and lumps in prostitution. I'm surprised he didn't mention
      drugs either. Neither of which are necessarily a scam, both of which happen without
      the pseudo-anonymity afforded by the internet.

      --
      Were that I say, pancakes?
    2. Re:Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In this case, it demonstrates a flaw in the Craigslist community--an honor-based system--that allows people to post for any address."

      No, the flaw is not that people can "post for any address." The flaw is that such posts are given undue credibility by their readers, combined with the fact that some criminals are exploiting that vulnerability.

      Absolutely anyone can post a paper flyer on the street corner, doing exactly the same thing. Would you then claim that's a flaw in our street systems? That we should be policing the streets for flyers containing incorrect addresses? Maybe whenever the police see a flyer on the street, they should make a photocopy, drive to the address, and ring the doorbell to make sure the person who answers can vouch for the flyer?

      P.S.
      To create a publication system that verified all information's veracity before publication would be practically impossible, without hiring full-time editors to research every single post, and Craigslist has no responsibility to do it (unless they are guaranteeing the posts, which would be a different matter). To create a publication system that just verified addresses would not be so difficult, but would significantly reduce the site's usefulness, all while failing to fix the problem except in the special case of address abuse.

    3. Re:Missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe how many of my peers digress ... I tell my students blah blah blah
      What can we learn from this blah blah


      Dude, you need to expand your perspective. If you've never simply laughed so hard at
      a social engineering hack that beer sprayed out your nose, then you will never be complete
      and you will someday realize, when you are close to the end, that all of your erudite analysis
      was for naught.

      Many of your peers probably muttered "clear" to themselves about 30 milliseconds after you
      first started talking about the ramifications of the craigslist posting because that aspect
      of it is obvious. Then they started thinking about evil landlords/spiteful tenants because
      that aspect of it is more mysterious, slippery, and entertaining. Beware that people may
      be way ahead of you more often than you think. You can bet that people at craigslist are.

    4. Re:Missing the point by TurboStar · · Score: 1

      Adding usage barriers to craigslist is not going to solve anything or make their image better. A feature like this would effectively shut down all real estate and rental listings leaving just the goods and services exchange. Since there's far more stolen items on craigslist than pranksters using addresses they aren't supposed to you'd just make their image worse overall.

      What you see as flaw is the main feature for making craigslist work.

  55. Re:The Most Important Data Ever by Rabbit+Time! · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it was meant to imply they didn't speak much english, which would make the resolution of a misunderstanding that much harder.

  56. ok, ok, but why is it by toby · · Score: 1

    That my main takeout from your post is that you misspelled "whooshing" in the sig?

    --
    you had me at #!
  57. Re:Hi (Dupe) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Rob "cmdrtaco" Malda.

    I have to get rid of everything in my house quickly, and I'm gonna let it go for free in order to get it out of here fast. Please leave the computers in the back closet though, I use those for slashdot.

    Thanks

    Rob


    As I quickie joke, I was just going to copy-and-paste the parent post, and call this post "Dupe".

    However, submitting this post failed with the error message:

    This exact comment has already been posted. Try to be more original...

    Oh the irony.

  58. metamod alert by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Note to metamods: this was a brilliant on-topic post by Tablizer, allegorically enforcing the point of the article. But, the mods are too thick to get that. In these matters, Dumb Moderation == Unfair Moderation.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  59. Re:Been there, almost by hahafaha · · Score: 1

    Should Craig's List require a subpoena? Of course!

    Actually, I'm pretty sure not, since they clearly say that they do not own or take responsibility for the posts.

  60. Re:Been there, almost by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    Particularly when it involves stealing things like the hot water heater and kitchen sink, things which, without, the home is now completely worthless.

    Whoa, settle down, Beavis. Her insurance policy should pick up the damages.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  61. Shouldn't this story be tagged with 'haha' already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  62. Re:Been there, almost by soft_guy · · Score: 1

    The landlord was pretty stupid, though. Why did they leave the doors unlocked? If I was going to evict someone, I would be there when the sherrif put them out and then change the locks and lock the doors.

    --
    Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  63. Re:Hi (Dupe) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not ironic, it's just coincidental.

  64. Shame on the police by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For not vigorously prosecuting this. They're sending a loud and clear message that perpetrating this kind of fraud is a-ok. This kind of precedent will encourage all kinds of people to go through Craigslist to extract their petty and not so petty vengence, because they'll rightly believe they can get away with it. This is plainly an example where the force of law needs to step in to prevent one person from violating the rights of another.

    Being realistic about our democracy here, if this keeps up people are going to be clamoring for a law to regulate Craigslist and its ilk. The industry owes it to itself to see what kind of self regulation it can put in place to avoid a far worse outcome. I guarantee if Craigslist creates some sort of verification process, it will be far less onerous than anything the gubmint imposes. Will vetting entries be costly? Yes. Will industry crushing regulation be even costlier? Hell yes. Time to put long term profits ahead of the next quarter, guys, or you'll be sorry.

  65. [confirmed][source] Re:The Best Idea Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This one really happened. A copy of the newspaper article appears as the last page in the Re/Search book "Pranks". IIRC, the date and specific street address are given.

  66. Re:Been there, almost by Some_Llama · · Score: 3, Funny

    I felt bad when i read your post as you obviously ran out of page breaks.. here are a few, they are good for breaking up long posts into smaller paragraphs:




  67. Prepositions are fun! by MS-06FZ · · Score: 1

    I know several people who've been abused through Craigslist -- unfortunately it just proves too tempting an environment for assholes. One friend had his garage pretty much cleaned out (bikes, tools, etc) from a posting on Craigslist saying he was moving and was offering it all free to people who would pick it up.

    Sorry to be pendactic here, but I don't believe your friend was "abused through Craigslist." Instead, he was abused by the lowlife thieves that stole his property. by lowlifes, through Craigslist.
    --
    ---GEC
    I'm but the humble pupil, seeking to snatch the scratchbuilt pebble from the master's fully articulated hand
  68. My next craigslist post: by jmcwork · · Score: 1

    World renowned photographer looking for next hot supermodel. Please arrive between 8 and 9 am at {fill in address). Initial shoot will be lingerie. Please come prepared.

  69. Re:Been there, almost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah yes. Insurance. Free Money! Oh wait, making that claim is going to bump up her future insurance payments a bit, I'd imagine.

  70. Re:Been there, almost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not likely if the doors were left unlocked.

  71. Landlording is HARD. by Slashdot+Parent · · Score: 1

    Don't apartments in the US come with a safety deposit? No, the landlord can't just take money from it but it's there so damages can be recovered from it. Oh yeah and if he's an asshat the apartment is likely trashed on top of defaulting on his payments.
    There is no standard regarding security deposits--it is whatever is negotiated between the landlord and the tenant.

    Sometimes a tenant can't afford a security deposit in a lump sum and will build it up over time. Sometimes a tenant will, as you say, cause damage that eats into the security deposit.

    At any rate, you are right, the security deposit can help cushion the blow. My guess in this case, however, is that there was no security deposit and that there was significant nonpayment of rent. The reason? Tenant was landlord's sister, and the property was her mother's house. The situation probably got way out of hand before landlord filed. Probably much ill will developed as well: How can you take your sister to court? How could you not pay your sister? How could you charge your sister to live in the house she grew up in? Stuff like that.

    There are many, many rules of landlording. The first two are not as relevant here as rule #3 is.
    Rule #3: Never rent to friends, family, family of friends, or friends of family.

    Landlording is deceptively difficult. 90% of the time landlording is exactly what you picture: Go to post office, pick up rent checks, go to bank, deposit rent checks. But it's that 10% of the time that can really kill you if you don't know what you're doing.

    What do you do when you go to the post office and no check is there?
    What do you do when a tenant doesn't have all the rent money and asks, "Can you work with me?"
    What do you do when a tenant is damaging your property?
    What do you do if you have a vacancy that no matter what you try, you just can't seem to fill?
    What do you do when a tenant is a bad neighbor (loud, rude, parks in the wrong spot, litters, does amateur auto maintenance on the lawn, etc.)?
    What do you do when a tenant won't leave your property at the end of the lease?
    What do you do when one tenant complains about another?
    What do you do if there's water or fire damage?
    What do you do if a tenant has the heat kicked up to 90 degrees with all the windows open where the landlord pays utilities?
    What do you do if the tenant doesn't pay his utility bills and the utility comes after you?
    What do you do when you realized you've paid too much for a property and your expenses are greater than your rents?

    These are just some of the thousand or so things that can happen in that 10% of the time. You would be shocked at the creativity some tenants show. Every time I think I've seen it all, someone reminds me that I haven't even scratched the surface.

    Landlording is definitely not for the feint at heart. For those who can learn to do it effectively, however, it can be extremely lucrative.

    --
    They don't grade fathers, but if your daughter's a stripper, you fucked up. --Chris Rock
  72. Re:The Most Important Data Ever by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

    I agree. That's the impression that I got. Not speaking English in an English speaking community would make it harder for somebody to raise concerns.

  73. Moral: Be nice to your relatives by Plekto · · Score: 1

    The thing most people forget is that the landlord was a relative. Kicked them out, then sold their stuff to pay for the back rent.(which say, if it was your parents - would probably feel morally okay with - even though it's illegal to do so).

    Of course, my guess is that there wasn't a formal rental agreement, either.

    So, the scenario:
    Parent or relative rents to their semi-deadbeat child or relative.
    Said renter, sans a rental contract, doesn't pay rent.
    Relative/parent kicks them out and sells their stuff to cover the back rent.(which is an incredibly mean and asshat thing to do to begin with)

    (I've had the same exact scenario happen with me two decades ago when I was in college with my parents - though they didn't sell my stuff, they threatened to do so)

    Now, what would you do as the person who's stuff got sold? Right - want your stuff back, and want to get even with them, of course.

    I tihn the police are right to call it a family feud and leave it alone, because both parties broke the law and are at fault.

    But it's funny to read about :)

    My second favorite, though, was the stench of doom.
    Someone was mad at their ex and so he got some shrimp from the market and tossed a handful in the curtain rod(inch or so round type), then screwed the cap back on. Stage two was later on - he took a tiny hand drill(sell these at Radio Shack/hobby stores) and made two microscopic holes in it to let air in.

    Took her over a year to figure out where the stink was coming from.

    I've also heard of people getting dead feeder mice from the pet store - the tiny thumb sized ones and tossing it in an ac vent or behind an outlet or simmilar.

    My favorite, though, was the $100 Porsche. Married couple. He was beyond obsessed and she wasn't taking it anymore, so she sold it for $100. (evidently she'd bought it for him or something, so he name was on the title). Moral: be nice to those close to you.

  74. Flash-mob by ukemike · · Score: 1

    This is interesting because it is an example of a flash-mob. It's more interesting because the mob itself was apparently unaware that they were committing a crime on behalf of anonymous third party. I think it is fascinating that one person did some typing on a keyboard and caused a mob of totally unrelated people to descend on a property and loot it.

    "You don't know the POWER of the dark side of Craigslist. Join me and together we will rule Tacoma as father and son!"

    --
    -- QED
  75. Re:Been there, almost by StewedSquirrel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe the proper action for Craigslist is to simply ignore any non-official demands for information.

    The only "official" way to demand information is a subpoena or search warrant.

    I don't want them shooting off the personal details of every poster each time they get an email claiming to be from "Joe FBI".

    Stew

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world. Those who understand binary and those who don't.
  76. Re:Hi (Dupe) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it is ironic.

  77. There is *NOTHING* funny about this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw this on the news the Wednesday night, and there is nothing funny about this. The house has basically been demolished. They took *EVERYTHING* including quite literally the kitchen sink. They even started taking out windows and such before a stop was put to this.

    The stance that Craigslist has taken should be criminal. Whoever posted the add deserves no protection, and should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Think about it, anyone here could be the next target of such a "Prank".

  78. Re:Whatever... by amadeusb4 · · Score: 1

    Not every cynic you meet is automatically dysfunctional.

  79. Solution by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

    If we bring back duels to the death for matters of honor, this kind of thing will not happen anymore.

  80. Around here it's not much by phorm · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the US, but around here the law basically says that a deposit can't be in excess of a month's rent (actually I think it's half a month's rent).

    Given that, it doesn't take much time at all to cause more than a month's rent in damage, and if your tenant is getting kicked out he/she might very well be pissed off enough to eat the loss of deposit (hell, if they're being kicked out, it might be that they already owe more than it already) and trash the place. Moreover, as the law does require a fairly lengthy notice/processing period on an eviction, it gives bad tenants all that much more time to do rather unpleasant things to the dwelling place before they are removed.

    That's why I prefer roommate situations, technically the roommate by law falls more as an extended guest, and has a lot less protections that get in the way of removing bad one. For the record I have not nor would I kick a roommate out without due notice, except under extreme circumstances... but it's nice to know that if I did end up with a really bad one (dealer, crack addict, psycho or other such) I could get him out. Plus being present myself means that - although I have to deal with the roomie on a regular basis - I have a pretty firm idea of what is going on in my place.