Slashdot Mirror


Venezula Producing Its Own Linux PCs

christian.einfeldt writes "The Venezuelan Government announced the roll-out of four different models of Linux-powered consumer computers, three desktop models and one notebook. Branded 'Bolivarian Computers,' they will be will be produced by a joint venture of the Venezuelan Ministry of Light Industry and Commerce and a Chinese company named Lang Chao. The goal of the project is to jump-start a domestic IT industry and become an IT exporter to the rest of Latin America. At the ceremony introducing the program, Venezuela's President Hugo Chavez claimed that the Bolivarian Computers cost 40% less than other commercially available models and come with a 3-year warranty."

387 comments

  1. Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    All Bolivarian computers come fully equipped with a wide selection of inflammatory anti-Bush screensavers

    1. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All Bolivarian computers come fully equipped with a wide selection of inflammatory anti-Bush screensavers

      It's sad how Chavez will be remembered around the world for the one thing he's been consistently right about, rather than an honest critical assessment of his achievements and methods. Hell, even Saddam Hussein, who used to be reviled throughout the Arab world, managed to resuscitate his historical legacy a bit through his opposition to Bush. Apparently if you oppose the biggest threat to peace and democracy in the world loudly enough, everyone forgets you're a slightly smaller threat yourself.

    2. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's sad how Chavez will be remembered around the world for the one thing he's been consistently right about, rather than an honest critical assessment of his achievements and methods.

      You mean like being able to legislate by decree, shutting down opposition TV stations, unchecked inflation, or doubling the murder rate? They are certainly achievements. But if I were him, I would rather be remembered as a Bush basher than the rest.

    3. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am with Linus Tovalds on this one. The guy is right.

    4. Re:Full featured linux distros by Vicissidude · · Score: 1

      Right about what? Making Venezuela technologically independent by selling computers running open source software on Intel processors made in America?

    5. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly the point of the original post. His anti-Bush rhetoric is whitewashing his other policies, making him seem like a good guy when he's not.

      Although one of those TV stations provided material assistance to the anti-democracy coup, so they got off easy by losing their license to broadcast. Other countries deal with treason more harshly.

    6. Re:Full featured linux distros by Simon80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You reading comprehension is severely deficient - I'm pretty sure you just repeated the parent's point. That being said, he's probably not all that bad. The US government just hates him because he's acting in Venezuela's interests, at the expense of foreign (US) interests.

    7. Re:Full featured linux distros by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      !Anti-Bush screensavers, keyloggers for the Venezuelan Secret Police, and a nice big fat backdoor so that Chavez can launch his super 'leet bot army to DDOS the Yanquis! !Que bueno!

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    8. Re:Full featured linux distros by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      The downside: any blog you maintain with one of these computers is automatically shut down and replaced with Chavez's own blog, known as "Fluffy Bunnies".

    9. Re:Full featured linux distros by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean like being able to legislate by decree

        * You mean like using a power that every other president in Venezuela has used?
        * You mean where "decree" is in an incredibly limited scope, a fact rarely reported by the media?
        * You mean where any act he legislates, no matter the method, can be rescinded by the popular vote?
        * You mean where normal laws take 10% of the population to rescind, decree laws take only 5%?
        * You mean where the legislature can rescind or modify said decrees -- quite unlike the US "Fast Track" legislation?"\

      Nah, let's demonize Chavez and distort the facts!

      shutting down opposition TV stations

        * You mean TV stations that helped organize a bloody coup against him?
        * You mean TV stations that even most of their backers admit broke the law?

      Nah, let's just demonize Chavez and distort the facts!

      unchecked inflation

        * You mean an inflation rate that was 31.2% in '03, 31.1% in '04, 22.4% in '05, 16% in '06, and 15.8% in '07?

      It's high, but it's dropping, not rising. Despite the best efforts of the opposition to destroy the economy.

      But nah, let's demonize Chavez!

      or doubling the murder rate?

        * With 11,000 murders in 2003 and a population of 26.2 million, that's 42 per 100,000, compared to their US-loving neighbor Colombia's 63-84 per 100k and Washington DC's ~50 per 100k.

      Bad numbers, and certainly worse than it was before. But, sadly, that's Latin America for you.

      They are certainly achievements. But if I were him, I would rather be remembered as a Bush basher than the rest.

      I'll note what you *didn't* mention, like the percentage of those without healthcare, or the illiteracy rate. Or like having to do this stuff with an opposition that wants to wreck the economy and once overthrew him in a coup, and the US who would like to do both of those as well.

      --
      Everybody point at the libertarian and laugh.
    10. Re:Full featured linux distros by RKBA · · Score: 1

      Excellent post Rei. The only thing I can add is to suggest that everyone watch the video The Revolution Will Not Be Televised.

    11. Re:Full featured linux distros by Rakishi · · Score: 1

      * You mean where any act he legislates, no matter the method, can be rescinded by the popular vote?
          * You mean where normal laws take 10% of the population to rescind, decree laws take only 5%? IF I remember it takes 10 or 5 percent SIGNATURES to start a vote to remove said law. Now that means valid signatures and oddly enough guess who gets to decide what valid signatures are (of course enough are invalid to fall below the threshold? There has already been one case recently where it took a lawsuit to have signatures put back on. Now the government in the interest of public safety and to stop abuse has made all the signers (their names, etc.) public.
    12. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, even Saddam Hussein, who used to be reviled throughout the Arab world, managed to resuscitate his historical legacy a bit through his opposition to Bush.

      Perhaps, but only amongst Grade A imbeciles.

    13. Re:Full featured linux distros by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Here's another, slightly older video that's pro-Bolivarian. Venezuela Bolivariana: People and the struggle of the 4th world war
      A DVD-quality version is available from the Internet Archive.

    14. Re:Full featured linux distros by slarabee · · Score: 5, Insightful
      * You mean like using a power that every other president in Venezuela has used?

      Five times. During specific crises.

      * You mean where "decree" is in an incredibly limited scope, a fact rarely reported by the media?

      Limited? This is the broadest use of the decree power ever granted. "This law applies to eleven key sectors including the economy, the central bank, telecommunications, food security and energy security." Previous uses of this power focused narrowly on single subjects.

      * You mean where any act he legislates, no matter the method, can be rescinded by the popular vote? * You mean where normal laws take 10% of the population to rescind, decree laws take only 5%?

      Those 5 and 10 percent numbers are for percentages of registered voters to request a referendum on that particular decree. Once that hurdle is passed, fifty percent is the target number. The killer, though, is the provision that 40% of registered voters must vote or the referendum is invalid. Venezuela has had the most ambitious voter registration campaign in the Americas the past several years. When looking at historical voting percentages, this means that repeal of any decree is highly unlikely.

      * You mean where the legislature can rescind or modify said decrees -- quite unlike the US "Fast Track" legislation?"

      What? Congress gets a yes/no vote on a treaty with no ability to make changes. Very narrow scope. I would not expect the Venezuelan legislature to modify anything. Something about one hundred percent Chavez supporters in the legislature makes that quite unlikely. Makes it even stranger that he would need decree powers in such a situation.

      * You mean TV stations that helped organize a bloody coup against him? * You mean TV stations that even most of their backers admit broke the law?

      Helped organize? The worst accusations I have heard were more in the range of lent support to. Even that has been denied by the station personel. *shrug* I have no firsthand information, but every single media watch group in the world that I have come across has opposed this shutdown. I am more likely to put my faith in them, than the claims of Chavez and his government.

      Same with the world's democracy watchgroups. Downgrading Venezuela's status under Chavez. Same with economic organizations. Downgrading Venezuela's status under Chavez. Same with human rights organizations. Downgrading Venezuela's status under Chavez.

      But nah, let's demonize Chavez!

      But nah, let's canonize Chavez! There are postitive and negative numbers in abundance for pro and anti Chavez folk to argue from here to eternity. What do you think of his long term future? Right now record oil prices are keeping his head above water. If those ever slack off, his happy ride with the people is going to get rough.

      and once overthrew him in a coup,

      I wouldn't play up coups as being justification for his actions. People might start to remember that Chavez was a coup leader himself back in the nineties -- one considerably more bloody than the one he survived. I believe the only dead in this coup were anti Chavez protesters shot down in the streets a couple days before the coup attempt.

    15. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as for shutting down venezuela's version of FOX news (well, times 100), GOOD JOB.

      Yeah, let's shut down by the force of a gun anyone that disagrees with us. Go team!

    16. Re:Full featured linux distros by TeXMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those 5 and 10 percent numbers are for percentages of registered voters to request a referendum on that particular decree. Once that hurdle is passed, fifty percent is the target number. The killer, though, is the provision that 40% of registered voters must vote or the referendum is invalid. Venezuela has had the most ambitious voter registration campaign in the Americas the past several years. When looking at historical voting percentages, this means that repeal of any decree is highly unlikely.
      Guess what, that's the definition of democracy: people get to choose on the issue. If the majority of registered voters LIKE the president's decree, they keep it, if they don't they can repel it. And it only takes 5% of the registered voters to call for a referendum on it. Does the "hated for its demakrassy" "democracy-exporting" US have any similarly democratic way to repel laws?
      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
    17. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With 11,000 murders in 2003 and a population of 26.2 million, that's 42 per 100,000, compared to their US-loving neighbor Colombia's 63-84 per 100k and Washington DC's ~50 per 100k.

      That is a really twisted way to put it. You compared two countries to a violent city in the US. Why did you refuse to compare it to the US overall murder rate, or better yet the murder rate of Europe (I don't know why you brought up the US). You cited Colombia as an example?!? Perhaps the only place on Earth with a higher murder rate than Colombia is Iraq! If you have a murder rate a tenth that of Colombia then your murder rate is still extremely high!

      * You mean TV stations that helped organize a bloody coup against him?
      * You mean TV stations that even most of their backers admit broke the law?


      This doesn't excuse his threats against Globalvision! RCTV is not the only TV station that he has threatened. RCTV is just the only one he has shut down. Globalvision didn't participate in the coup. They just oppose Chavez. Why is that a crime?

    18. Re:Full featured linux distros by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      "it's so hard to repeal his decrees because so many people vote in venezuela." how anti-democratic.

      That's not what he said at all. He said that 40% of registered voters need to vote for the results to matter, and that they are engaged in a huge voter registration campaign.

      He didn't say huge numbers vote, nor did he say there was any similar program to get people out to the polls instead of just registered.

      If I have 50 people with these rules, 20 of them would be required to vote. Let's say 30 do (60%, heck of a rate!). But I don't want people to overturn my decrees, so I go register another 50 to vote who are highly unlikely to vote. Poor people are probably are fairly good example. Now all the sudden 40 of the 100 need to vote, and only 30 do. It's "democratic," but act the act of registering voters was a ruse, not a well-intentioned idea that people didn't take advantage of.

      We probably won't know what the intent was because it's so hard to judge intent, but that's how I read his statements.

    19. Re:Full featured linux distros by sqldr · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Venezula....! aww forget it. What a moron. It's one thing to criticise Bush while making your own policies.. it's another to base an entire country's manifesto on anti-Bush rhetoric. That guy's got some serious growing up to do.

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    20. Re:Full featured linux distros by Sitxu · · Score: 0

      No what I mean is, he's not a president he's a dictator, c'mon electronic voting with windows machines that take 2 days to announce the results.
      No what I mean is, the millions od dollars that the dictator spends in lobbying guess where, yes in USA, while hospitals fall apart.
      No what I mean is, anyone who oppose him will join the "tascon" list. do you know what it is? if you don't you'll know that you just wrote is the crap learned thanks to the peoples money he's spent in lobbying.
      Non what I tell you is go there and get the FACTS, just go to CARACAS and ask by yourself

      --
      cualquier vaina hagase el muerto
    21. Re:Full featured linux distros by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      Although one of those TV stations provided material assistance to the anti-democracy coup, so they got off easy by losing their license to broadcast. Other countries deal with treason more harshly. Yes, the two qualities consistently displayed by noble men of the people are truthfulness and compassion.

      Their patience with political opposition is also legendary embracing, as they inevitably do, diversity. Oh, and that's not "anti-democratic coup". The preferred term is "counter-revolutionary action", or it is "hooliganism against the people"? The, whatever the translation is for "KGB", will take care of them.

      Maybe you know what the Spanish word for "gulag" might be?

      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    22. Re:Full featured linux distros by arpad1 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Guess what, that's the definition of democracy: people get to choose on the issue. If the majority of registered voters LIKE the president's decree, they keep it, if they don't they can repel it. And it only takes 5% of the registered voters to call for a referendum on it. Does the "hated for its demakrassy" "democracy-exporting" US have any similarly democratic way to repel laws? Oh sure, heaps of 'em. Laws are regularly repealed by direct action of the electorate not that it's all that good a way to legislate. The U.S. is a constitutionally-limited republic, not a democracy. Direct legislation is anti-democratic since a pure democracy is always one vote away from a dictatorship. Of course if you're hoping to establish a dictatorship of the proletariat a democracy is pretty attractive.

      Tell you what, the first time Chavez has any legislation repealed by "the people" he professes to love so deeply is when he can claim to be an elected representative. Until then he's a Castro, or a Mao, or an Uncle Joe wannabe anxious to become the real deal.
      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    23. Re:Full featured linux distros by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      Hell, even Saddam Hussein, who used to be reviled throughout the Arab world, managed to resuscitate his historical legacy a bit through his opposition to Bush. Yeah, everywhere but Iraq.

      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    24. Re:Full featured linux distros by Gotta+ask+yourself.. · · Score: 1
      shutting down opposition TV stations

      He's not shut down any TV station, the concession simply expired and the government didn't renew it. There's still plenty of other opposition TV stations and RCTV (the TV station you're talking about) is still able to transmit via cable and satellite.

      Shall I remind you that RCTV had a big, the biggest role of all in the 2002 coup d'état, by spreading false information about the president? A coup d'état behind which, allegedly, there's the CIA, by the way.

    25. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chavez's crap obviously works on Slashdotters, too.

      He uses the anti-Bush stuff to increase his own personal power. He ain't doing it for Venezuela or anybody else.

    26. Re:Full featured linux distros by rbanffy · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Forgive me, but his intolerance to opposition - culminating with the closure of a very vocal opposition TV station - and his rule by decree status acquired by tampering with the constitution thanks to a legislative majority acquired in, to say the least, unusual circumstances, make him quite bad enough for me.

      He is not acting on Venezuelan people's interests. He is acting on his and his minion's interests, but, since his minions more or less control all of Venezuela, the line gets blurry.

    27. Re:Full featured linux distros by enrevanche · · Score: 1

      The US interests that you speak of are just the interests of certain elements of the American elite. They are contrary to the interests of the US as a country and especially of the public at large.

    28. Re:Full featured linux distros by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, but said interests have enough influence to convince many other people that Chavez is some sort of malevolent dictator.

    29. Re:Full featured linux distros by Simon80 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The TV station wasn't closed, it merely lost its license to broadcast over the air. This means that it can now only be viewed using cable.

      You seem confused - "unusual circumstances" doesn't really explain anything, and the constitution wasn't "tampered", Chavez declared a referendum, and 92% of voters wanted a new constitution. Hard to see what's wrong with that.

      After my first comment in this thread, I did some research, and found this documentary about the failed Venezuelan coup in 2002. After watching that, I can't really blame Chavez for not renewing the license of a private TV station, they seem to lie through their teeth. Also, Chavez is so tolerant of opposition that after regaining power following the 2002 coup, he didn't go around and exile or imprison everybody involved. Some have most probably been charged for their actions, but some prominent leaders from the coup government are still supposedly part of public life in Venezuela.

    30. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please don't make an opinion about something that you don't know, If you wanna, I can invite you to come here and see with your own eyes what's the true about the venezuelan interest, and just in case that you were a Venezuelan citizen don't be ridiculous saying that, you don't see all homeless, all people unemployed, all kids living in streets? please don't be blind.

      Sorry about my poor english but I am a venezuelan citizen, and living here I just speak spanish

    31. Re:Full featured linux distros by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      The two aren't mutually exclusive. Hugo Chavez is a brutal dictator that refuses to cave into the bullying of the United States. Just because the U.S. might be a bad guy in this situation, it doesn't mean that Hugo Chavez is a good guy. When even solid anti-American left-wing groups like the French Socialist Party are calling the guy a dictator, I think it is safe to assume that his dictator-like tendencies aren't American propoganda. Not to mention Reporters Without Borders, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, etc.

      Unfortunatly, most people (like yourself), are willing to forgive brutal dictators so long as they approve of the dictator's politics.

    32. Re:Full featured linux distros by ggambett · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bad numbers, and certainly worse than it was before. But, sadly, that's Latin America for you.

      That's some parts of Latin America for you. In Uruguay I think there are about 300 murders a year, I'm not sure if in all of Uruguay (3.5 million people) or just Montevideo (1.5 million people), that's 8.5/100K or worst case 20/100K. Not all of Latin America is Colombia, Mexico or Bolivia, you know...

    33. Re:Full featured linux distros by mrcparker · · Score: 1

      Stop using your facts to overcome this very interesting emotional argument. If I can ignore the fact that Chavez once was a violent coup leader, and a fascist asshole who uses his power to shut down the press, so can you. Plus, have you got Greg Palast, Chavez' own Herbert Matthews, to make you look as clean as Christ? I think not.

    34. Re:Full featured linux distros by sailorKa · · Score: 1

      Puh-lease! Shall I remind you that RCTV had a big, the biggest role of all in the 2002 coup d'état, by spreading false information about the president? A coup d'état behind which, allegedly, there's the CIA, by the way. Sure, why don't you pull a bunny out of a hat while you recite that BS?! I swear that if Chavez got (even more)overweight he'd blame the CIA for sending imperialist fat meat to Venezuela. *rolls eyes* The fact is that Chavez CLOSED DOWN RCTV with the concession excuse. Just watch that very chavist film someone just linked The Revolution Will Not Be Televised [google.com] and notice that the angry, ultra anti-chavez comments come from VENEVISION(channel 4) and RCTV doesn't appear until the first half hour has passed. Why didn't Chavez shut down Venevisión as well? Because they agreed to play under Chavez's terms. Globovisión is the only channel left that opposses Chavez and even thou they don't reach half as much territory as RCTV and even thou "Most of Venezuela supports the RCTV shutdown"[sic for hilarity], can you tell me then why the viewing rates of Globovisión have almost tripled since RCTV was hut down and why the new goverment channel that overtook RCTV, TVES, doesn't get even half of the viewing shares RCTV, as one of the oldest TV channels in Venezuela, used to get? Just my two cents. --k

    35. Re:Full featured linux distros by Usquebaugh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      CIA is the usual translation for KGB in latin america

    36. Re:Full featured linux distros by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      If he was behaving like a brutal dictator, a busload of people would have ended up in prison or dead after that 2002 coup attempt. If he was democratically elected with a wide margin, and he isn't violating human rights, on what grounds can you accuse him of being a dictator?

    37. Re:Full featured linux distros by Rei · · Score: 1

      And this is exactly why I'm complaining about how ill-informed the anti-Chavez US media has left the American public.

      Limited? This is the broadest use of the decree power ever granted. "This law applies to eleven key sectors including the economy, the central bank, telecommunications, food security and energy security."

      Thanks for reinforcing my point about how distorted of a view the media has presented. The areas that he can "decree" on are little more extensive than what the US president can "decree" on by how he adjusts his cabinet and sets their policies. Here's a list:

      * Transformation of the institutions of the state. Chavez would be allowed to change state institutions so that these become more efficient, include greater citizen participation, and are more transparent.
      * Popular participation. Here the President would be allowed to develop norms that enable citizen participation in public oversight. Also part of this is the enabling of the direct exercise of popular sovereignty. Exactly what is meant by this has so far not been explained.
      * Establishing norms for the eradication of corruption. This would also involve changing the civil service system.
      * The creation of norms for adopting existing legislation to the construction of a new social and economic model, in order to achieve equality and equitable distribution of wealth, under the ideals of social justice and economic independence.
      * Finances and tax collection. The development of norms to modernize monetary, banking, insurance, and tax sectors.
      Citizen and judiciary security. The development of norms for updating the systems of public health, citizen security, prisons, identification, migration, and judiciary.
      * Science and technology. Norms for the development of science and technology to satisfy the needs of education, health, environment, biodiversity, industrialization, quality of life, and defense.
      * Territorial order. Norms that establish a new territorial organization on the sub-national level, so as to optimize state action.
      * Security and defense. Norms for enabling the co-responsibility of state and organized communities by establishing a new functioning of the institutions of security and defense of the nation.
      * Infrastructure, transport, and services. Norms that support the use of the human and industrial potential and the existing infrastructure to improve transport systems, public services, home construction, and telecommunications, among others.

      Note the use of "norms". Furthermore, no decree can supercede the constitution, and, as noted below, the legislature can modify them and the public rescind them.

      The killer, though, is the provision that 40% of registered voters must vote or the referendum is invalid. Venezuela has had the most ambitious voter registration campaign in the Americas the past several years. When looking at historical voting percentages, this means that repeal of any decree is highly unlikely.

      They also have an extremely high voter turnout. Their last presidential election had 74.06%.

      Don't pretend that this is some sort of insurmountable hurdle. Laws can only stand that the public isn't majorly opposed to.

      What? Congress gets a yes/no vote on a treaty with no ability to make changes. Very narrow scope.

      Exactly. Our congress can't modify Fast Track legislation. His legislature *can* modify "decrees".

      I would not expect the Venezuelan legislature to modify anything. Something about one hundred percent Chavez supporters in the legislature makes that quite unlikely.

      Something about the Venezuelans voting Chavez-loyal parties into power in an election that even much of the opposition generally admits was conducted fairly** (although with low turnout by Venezuelan standards***) bother you? Much

      --
      Everybody point at the libertarian and laugh.
    38. Re:Full featured linux distros by Rei · · Score: 1

      To reinforce the concept of the "norms": Chavez could, for example, state that all meetings of an economic committee must be allowed to have the public attend, or banks can't set their own interest rates more than 1% from the federal rate. He can't, for example, say that a person should be arrested and imprisoned, or that some political party can't run, or whatnot.

      --
      Everybody point at the libertarian and laugh.
    39. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After reading all your posts on the subject i can appreciate your view after reading some stuff about how he has treated people after the coup and you taking the side that maybe the media has propagandized Chavez to make us believe he is worse than he really is. Heave knows it happens enough that we have to be skeptical of what we see from places like Fox.

      However having lived in Venezuela for several years under the rule of Chavez let me tell you that he is not being portrayed as a bad person just because he is acting in the best interest of Venezuela instead of the US. He really is a dictator and the only thing about him more dangerous than how crazy he is, is how smart and charismatic he is.

      You talk about how he hasn't thrown the people who lead the coup against him into jail but that's only because everyone in the country outside of his elite circle hates him so much that in order to maintain some degree of order he has to tolerate some of the people who are against him.

      If you really want to find out about Chavez i would encourage you to go down to Venezuela (Although right now getting into the country with a US passport is very difficult) and see what the people think, it's not far off what we get in the US media.

      Wikipedia is great to find out info but it doesn't mean that you know the whole story.

    40. Re:Full featured linux distros by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      I saw that documentary at least once, but I fail to see its value. It's a pro-Chávez documentary. The guys who made it liked Chávez. That's quite common.

      As for the broadcast-rights you are right. Unfortunately, in all aspects, they were closed, since they were limited to a very small market they did not cater for previously. A change like this requires some major programming restructuring and it's very unlikely that they would even survive.

      And you are right all Chávez did was absolutely legal. He was elected and re-elected, much like many dictators of the past. Unfortunately, their new constitution does not restrain him nearly enough and being elected may end up as a mere formality.

      I am not optimistic.

    41. Re:Full featured linux distros by Mover · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate to be a poopy head, but the US interests include jobs, food and clothing for Americans (and anyone else who can find the border).

      Everything that the USA is depends on energy. That would be oil. The USA's "elites" used to own oil wells in Venezuela that helped many Venezuelans and Americans proper, but the communist government "nationalized" them (that's a polite term for stealing them).

      Did it help th people of Venezuela? Nope. They don't see much, if any, of it.

      That should be the real problem the USA has with Mr. Chavez and his supporters. His foul mouth is easily ignored.

    42. Re:Full featured linux distros by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      There are massive violations of human rights going on (over 5000 extra-judicial killings, for example - More people killed than under Pinochet), in addition to essentially eliminating the right to free press, elimination of independant judiciary, and ruling by decree, etc.

      Like I said, when extremly lefty groups like the French Socialist Party are condeming the guy, it isn't some "Right Wing Capitalist Conspiracy" like you want to pretend. Unfortunatly, most people don't have a problem with political violence and totalitarianism so long as the people commiting the crimes hold acceptable political views. You like Chavez, so you are willing to look the other way when the police machine gun down Chavez critics in the street, or when the military puts entire universities under house arrest in order to suppress political protests.

    43. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NOOOOOOOO FEAR DEMOCRACY LET A FEW RICH DOUCHBAGS RULE US ALL.

      yea people are too dumb to know what they want. democracy is to be feared. embrace capitalist oligarchy.

      fucking tool.

    44. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason the TV station "got off easy" is because there's no proof whatsoever that they did anything even remotely illegal. It's like saying 'I'm fairly sure you robbed me, but instead of taking you to court, proving it and sending you to jail, I'll get you off easily by simply taking your property as payment'.

      You have to be very naive to not realize that the closing of the TV station is because it was highly critical of the government and Chavez simply got tired of it.

    45. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * You mean TV stations that helped organize a bloody coup against him?
      Do you even have any idea what you are talking about? Do you know, for instance, that 100% of the victims of that day were either unarmed civilians protesting against Chavez, or police agents trying to protect the civilians, whom were being shot death by government agents?
      When a government acts like that, it's the duty of the people to take it down, by force if necessary. It's written so in the Bolivarian constitution.

    46. Re:Full featured linux distros by exiquio · · Score: 1

      ^^^second

    47. Re:Full featured linux distros by mechapants · · Score: 1

      chavez hater or lover aside score one for nix!

    48. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they could have been sentenced to use Windows.

    49. Re:Full featured linux distros by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >over 5000 extra-judicial killings, for example - More people killed than under Pinochet

      source?

    50. Re:Full featured linux distros by RexRhino · · Score: 1

      Amnesty International:
      http://web.amnesty.org/report2006/Ven-summary-eng

      Not that it makes a difference... You already know Chavez is a brutal dictator... you just don't have a problem with mass-murder and totalitarianism when it is being perpetrated by those who share your political views. You will think of some sort of excuse why thousands of people being murdered by death squads doesn't count.

    51. Re:Full featured linux distros by hswerdfe · · Score: 1

      92% of voters wanted a new constitution first one had 2 questions.
      they were something like
      1. Do you want a new constitution?
      2. Do you think Way X is good way to make one?
      these passed with like 90ish% and 80ish%.
      Then When they were done there was a second referendum asking something like
      Do you like this constitution?
      That passed also with a large margin but it was more like 70ish%

      p.s.
      This is an english translation of the constitution
      http://www.analitica.com/bitblioteca/venezuela/con stitucion_ingles.pdf
      its a good read....
      --
      --meh--
  2. My First ever First Post by arthurpaliden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But seriously, sometimes govenment direction can result in good stuff. Just like Brazil and energy selfsuficiancy. They say a problem, no oil, and the govenment of the day said OK, we will go ethynol. Ans now they do not have a relience onf foriegn oil.

    1. Re:My First ever First Post by mi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Government direction can be a good thing. Government intervention will never be.

      This project is doomed from the start — take the pink glasses off for a second, and imagine the US government trying anything like it. This very forum would've been all mad about it — and justifiably so.

      For example, consider the expected quality of support. We all complain about the poor Indians, who can't properly troubleshoot Dell computer problems. That's with English being the official language in India.

      Now imagine the Chinese supporting these "Bolivarian computers". In Spanish...

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    2. Re:My First ever First Post by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      you should have held off and tried to get user ID 1,000,000 :)

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    3. Re:My First ever First Post by Phil-14 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny you should mention that, the last time I checked Brazil didn't solve its problems with ethanol alone, they also expanded onshore and offshore oil drilling a great deal. Of course, that doesn't fit the "story" everyone wants to tell.

      --
      (currently testing something about signatures here)
    4. Re:My First ever First Post by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      I understand you point but the way I read it the Chinese are in it for the technological and industrial part... the support will likely come from Venezuelans themselves, who are the other half of the "joint venture".

      Although the image of a callcentre in Beijing helping users in Venezuela in spanish on how to install a TrueType font is interesting in it's own right :)

    5. Re:My First ever First Post by Score+Whore · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You're applauding a government that nationalized oil companies, food producers, media, etc? Gave dictatorial powers to a lame duck president? Well, not so lame duck anymore since he's aiming to abolish term limits. Oh and that nationalization of their industries have gone really well, unless you like to eat meat. Or have freedom to speak out against the policies of the government. Or want your quality of life to increase. Sure.

      Government has no place in business, you always end up with cronyism, corruption and an entrenched pile of criminals pillaging the rest of the country.

    6. Re:My First ever First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear citizens of Venezuela - you have no feeedoms anymore, but here is a cheap computer to distract you for awhile.

    7. Re:My First ever First Post by arthurpaliden · · Score: 0, Troll

      Which is why the United States is pillaging other people countries.

    8. Re:My First ever First Post by morari · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh and that nationalization of their industries have gone really well, unless you like to eat meat. Well, eating meat is pretty distasteful. Not to mention gross from an ethical standpoint in the case of many factory farms and modern slaughter houses. Maybe if human hunting, breeding, production, slaughter and sale was legalized I couldn't scream "hypocrites" as loudly...
      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    9. Re:My First ever First Post by mshurpik · · Score: 1

      >This project is doomed from the start -- take the pink glasses off for a second

      Actually, I'm surprised that you're surprised by this. Latin America is the next North America in terms of size, economy, and growth potential. It was only a matter of time before cheap, reliable PC's became part of the Latin American economy. Ever been on Battle.net (Wc3)? DOTA BRAZIL ONLY.

      The only pink vision I have, is that someone like me would move down there, and do it myself. I guess I'm disappointed that Latin America still needs a dictator-esque leader to do it for them.

    10. Re:My First ever First Post by menkhaura · · Score: 1

      Hum, lately I've seen much of that (no freedom) in the UK. The V for Vendetta movie seems creepingly more prophetic every day. US comes in a very close second place, but they don't need a cheap computer to distract the masses, just Superbowl will do for the time being, with the occasional Iraq bombings on CNN.

      --
      Stupidity is an equal opportunity striker.
      Fellow slashdotter Bill Dog
    11. Re:My First ever First Post by Brotherred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This project is doomed from the start — take the pink glasses off for a second, and imagine the US government trying anything like it. This very forum would've been all mad about it — and justifiably so.

      For example, consider the expected quality of support. We all complain about the poor Indians, who can't properly troubleshoot Dell computer problems. That's with English being the official language in India.

      Now imagine the Chinese supporting these "Bolivarian computers". In Spanish...

      Still it is a perfect example of how GNU+Linux will survive out side the US if not in it. RMS has even suggested that they MIGHT have to move the FSF overseas. We all have heard him say that the US government is just a tool for MS and he is not that far off.
      --
      Those that do not know, pay for it.
    12. Re:My First ever First Post by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

      Sure. OK. Save the animals, but kill the people. And the spiders and the other various living creatures that you personally kill every single day by the millions. But that's probably OK cause they're little and not cute and fuzzy.

      There is no moral or ethical case for not eating meat. The food chain is the fundamental processes that make the environment work.

      Many animals will kill and eat people. Plus many will kill people because they perceive a threat their way of life. Not that I'm claiming animals have such a concept, but a pride of lions will do you in if they think you are a threat. Same goes for a herd of elephants. Even ducks and geese kill do their best to kill you if they think you are invading their territory.

    13. Re:My First ever First Post by morari · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'm not some PETA pal that subscribes to the "cute and fuzzy" ideology. Besides, I mentioned "gross from an ethical standpoint in the case of many factory farms and modern slaughter houses". Such situations are hardly natural, and certainly do not promote the food chain or the environment. Such things are torture and genocide. Humans do not promote nature at all however, from the food chain to natural selection. We've all but bred out NATURE from our species and thus are a threat to any other species' way of life. My personal distaste for most meats aside, I see little wrong with going out and humanely killing what you will use. My remark about humans was mainly sarcasm, though I don't see why we should draw a line of difference when genocide is already an acceptable value when it comes to our daily diet of store-bought steaks and foreign wars.

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    14. Re:My First ever First Post by wanderingknight · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like the private efforts of people whose only objective is to make profit for themselves is better than that ;)

    15. Re:My First ever First Post by mi · · Score: 1

      the support will likely come from Venezuelans themselves

      I'm an active FreeBSD contributor. In my over ten years of involvement with the project, I can't recall a single person from Venezuella.

      Maybe, they are all in the Linux camp — preferring the Bolivarian GPL over the capitalist BSD or something. But somehow I doubt, there is enough Linux expertise in Venezuella to support an "IT industry", that could possibly supply the rest of Latin America with computers.

      My other point — about the inherent misguidedness of the government doing this sort of thing — still stands too. Germans could've pulled something like this off (see Volkswagen, etc.), but it was not pretty — and it was not purely governmental either...

      This project will not take off (other than as a way to buy a cheap computer to install pirated Windows on), and when the oil price comes back down, it will collapse with the rest of the unfortunate country.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    16. Re:My First ever First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you haven't noticed, but the beaners aren't moving to central america, they're moving to the US. The 60% of the central america economy depends on western union transfers from illegals in the US.

    17. Re:My First ever First Post by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Human breeding is already legal, even if you can't get in on the action.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    18. Re:My First ever First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutely right. I am a Republican in the true sense of the word. I hate Bush and Company. We really need to label them for what they are. They are Facists, there is nothing Republican about them.

    19. Re:My First ever First Post by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1
      I suppose we should scrap the OLPC project too, as they are looking for governmental backing, and the places they are slated to release them seem fairly low on active open source developers.

      The prospect that the government would screw this up is unfounded and ridiculous. You don't need to contribute to the FreeBSD project to know how to install and run the OS. You don't need to export your support network at all.

      In fact, you don't know any of the specs of this machine, yet you assume it will just be used to pirate Windows. Well guess what? That's exactly what's happening on the ground today, and any project to put Linux as a default platform will cut into that market, reducing piracy as well as reducing dependence on proprietary formats.

    20. Re:My First ever First Post by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is. Their objective is to make a profit. That means they need to provide better service, selection, and/or lower prices than competing businesses. Go wait at the DMV for a while and then tell me how much better altruistic government service is.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    21. Re:My First ever First Post by oatworm · · Score: 1

      No, they are not torture or genocide. Genocide is the "deliberate and systematic extermination of a national, racial, political, or cultural group". Animals are neither national, racial, political, or cultural, unless we identify them as such, and we have a word for that - it's called "personalization". In order to have a national, racial, political, or cultural identity, you have to be aware of that identity, and, at least beyond a basic pack identity in certain animals, they're not. Besides, the animals as a group aren't being exterminated; if they were, those slaughterhouses would close pretty quick. Torture? Nah - we're not doing it to be cruel, for punishment, or for information. We're just being efficient. If it was more efficient to be nicer, we would be. Heck, "free range" is getting quite popular and profitable - expect to see more of it.

      Animals are food. We kill them and eat them. This idea that we need to treat them nicely before we kill them seems a little odd, considering how the end result is always the same. I agree that killing animals needlessly is wrong - it's wasteful, if nothing else. I also don't want to unduly stress them - it ruins the meat. This is why I don't mind getting my food from factories; they're efficient, they're usually cleaner than the wide outdoors (mad cow notwithstanding), and, when you're doing a factory farm, you're using a lot less land to produce the same amount of meat, which saves more room for other things.

    22. Re:My First ever First Post by drsquare · · Score: 1

      If you don't like one company, you're free to form another one and compete. You can't have several concurrent governments, you're stuck with the one you've got. Companies who don't have any customers and can't balance the books go bust, badly-run government entities can run on indefinitely because their income and existence is guaranteed.

    23. Re:My First ever First Post by rts008 · · Score: 1

      "Now imagine the Chinese supporting these "Bolivarian computers". In Spanish..."

      *Head asplodes!*

      Interesting...yes, most interesting.

      My only problem with this is, I have a hard time taking Hugo seriously most of the time.

      Oddly enough, I hope this project works out and really takes off like a rocket. I wouldn't mind seeing it spread like wildfire across the globe. (Yes, I'm a FOSS advocate!)

      Imagine MS's market share on the desktop dropping to 50-60% instead of 90%. They would have to get better squared away (codewise) than they are now...OMGZ!!! they may have to actually innovate instead of cool presentations and marketing blitz tactics, then cutting the cutting edge features 'cause we're too busy getting critical fixes out for our last OS, but SP2 (XP) will really fix things'

      Ahh...sorry for the rant. :-)

      MS just raises my blood pressure when I'm foolish enough to let it.

      What I started out to say is that I think you bring up some interesting points, and I think it will
        turn into either an intersting event, or a non-event. We will see.

      --
      Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
    24. Re:My First ever First Post by ultranova · · Score: 1

      The V for Vendetta movie seems creepingly more prophetic every day.

      I didn't see the movie but read the comic - ironically, in a publicly funded library. What I found funny about it was how the V guy kept going on about the wonders of anarchy, never realizing that he was living in it; specifically, the final stage of anarchy where the various factions fighting for power have settled the fight and divided the turfs, which they then rule with iron hand.

      For reference, the stages of anarchy:

      1. Chaos; everyone against everyone since there's no law.
      2. People begin forming packs (gangs and "vigilante" posses); gang against gang, aka civil war.
      3. The surviving pack(s) establish its/their turfs; V's world.
      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    25. Re:My First ever First Post by sqldr · · Score: 0

      Of course, this works right up until the US puts an export levy on intel CPUs headed for venezula. hahaha :-D

      --
      I wrote my first program at the age of six, and I still can't work out how this website works.
    26. Re:My First ever First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you even have the slightest idea what pillaging means?

    27. Re:My First ever First Post by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      None of them would want to come here if we stopped signing "free trade" agreements that allow our big corporations to move their jobs south of the border and pay the natives pennies on the dollar. Maybe you should stop supporting the assholes who make these deals so that you won't be up all night worrying about losing your minimum wage job to a Mexican, you dipshit.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    28. Re:My First ever First Post by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      I suppose we should scrap the OLPC project too, as they are looking for governmental backing, and the places they are slated to release them seem fairly low on active open source developers.

      The OLPC is not a government-funded or managed project. Government involvement actually starts when the first check clears. Perhaps you'd like to hold your breath until that happens as a show of solidarity with the OLPC project?

      The prospect that the government would screw this up is unfounded and ridiculous. Yes, the history of government technology projects is one of brilliant successes brought in on time and within budget.

      You don't need to contribute to the FreeBSD project to know how to install and run the OS. There's a bit of difference between installing and running an OS and installing and running an OS throughout a nation. But I'm sure it's nothing the People's Bureau of Patriotic Hackers couldn't handle.

      In fact, you don't know any of the specs of this machine, yet you assume it will just be used to pirate Windows. Of course it'll be used to pirate Windows. Whatever agency Chavez sets up will end up making Linux both less attractive and more expensive then Windows. The inefficiency and corruption of government programs will drive Venezuelans who want to do something with their computers other then use them as paperweights into Bill Gates' arms. Chalk up another victory for the people!
      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    29. Re:My First ever First Post by arpad1 · · Score: 1

      As a threat it isn't much of a threat although I'd encourage Mr. Stallman to act on his rhetoric. That'd put him one up on Alec Baldwin which is, I'm sure, one of Mr. Stallman's goals in life.

      --
      Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    30. Re:My First ever First Post by lordtoran · · Score: 1

      Government has no place in business, you always end up with cronyism, corruption and an entrenched pile of criminals pillaging the rest of the country. In this other extreme case, we end up with draconian monopolies pressuring the government (hello USA). It's not only black and white. Germany for example has a social market economy with complex but equitable taxation laws and many options of governmental intervention, but manages to be the world's largest exporter nevertheless.
      --
      Want to hear the voice of GOD? cat /boot/vmlinuz > /dev/dsp
    31. Re:My First ever First Post by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      they're efficient,


      Factory farming is anything but efficient, it just allows for more intensive production, maximizing profits for a few people. They have huge energy demands, not to mention the amount that went into producing the feed.

      they're usually cleaner than the wide outdoors


      You ever been inside a factory farm?
      There's shit and piss everywhere, and it doesn't get cleaned. Cows are covered in it, even though they would be relatively clean if they were kept outside. They slip all over the place because of it, and it gets all over the udder.

      What is it about people who think that their food has to be "clean", in that it can't have come in contact with "the dirt outdoors"?
      It really irritates me when I hear people say things like this.
      Humans are integrated in a food cycle, permanently recycling the matter that makes up the food. Everything you eat comes from "dirt". Of course, many people in western societies have forgotten this, thanks to factory farming and supermarkets, so that most people haven't the faintest idea of how food is produced.

      Yes, you should know how to protect yourself from disease, but being scared of food that, OMG, has been outside, is hysterical.

      when you're doing a factory farm, you're using a lot less land to produce the same amount of meat, which saves more room for other things.


      Yeah, cause we so need land for "other things", which is why a large amount of agricultural land is permanently set-aside in Europe. (BTW, what about the land used to produce the crops for the animal feed?)
    32. Re:My First ever First Post by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      Well, I was assuming that the government-owned part of the deal would include that, if not now 5 years from now. I understand you though, I also never encountered anyone from Venezuela in the Linux or GNU camp myself (not saying thatey aren't out there, just my personal experience).

    33. Re:My First ever First Post by nicobn · · Score: 0

      Hydro-Québec is one of the most successful electricity producer/transporter/distributor in the world and it is owned by the government of Quebec, sir. And so far, none of the symptoms you described apply to it.

    34. Re:My First ever First Post by wanderingknight · · Score: 1

      You're not free to form a new company when you don't have the means to do so. Life is a game, and if you enter it in the wrong position (like 80% of the world population does) you're not in the position to do whatever you want. True freedom in capitalism is nothing more than an illusion. The role of the government should be to provide equal opportunities for everyone, since companies only provide equal opportunities to those who are in certain positions ;)

    35. Re:My First ever First Post by JohnBailey · · Score: 1

      So Bolivian companies will outsource to China for support instead of using cheap labor in their own country? What a brilliant idea.

      --
      It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his job depends on not understanding it.
    36. Re:My First ever First Post by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Government direction can be a good thing. Government intervention will never be.
      So, for example, laws against slavery or child labour aren't a good thing?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    37. Re:My First ever First Post by haruchai · · Score: 1



      "Government has no place in business, you always end up with cronyism, corruption and an entrenched pile of criminals pillaging the rest of the country."

        Perhaps you should spend some time looking at the history of corporations.
        They have not needed the influence of government in order to indulge in unethical
        or criminal practices.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  3. This surely confirms ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that Linux is a tool for communists and Godless atheists! [goes hiding under a rock]

    1. Re:This surely confirms ... by ettlz · · Score: 1

      Linux is a tool for communists and Godless atheists!
      You say that like it's a bad thing.
  4. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by nlitement · · Score: 1

    Enemies? Let's see what happens if US or any European businesses leave China, they can kneel. They better call us friends.

  5. As much as I hate Chavez... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Interesting

    we have to recognize that *THIS* particular action is good.

    Too bad he's choosing Free Software to promote his government where personal freedom is gone.

    1. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by daeg · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Government computers probably come with government spyware (not the annoying kind the rest of the world deals with). When someone discovers it they won't be able to say anything through the government-owned media and will be thrown out of their job and be on government blacklists and be unable to obtain government food rations...

      I wonder if they will follow the GPL when they introduce nastiness into the kernel?

    2. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chavez has an approval rating over 80%. George Bush has an approval rating of 30%. Americans might have more freedom of the press but they also can be jailed for years without charges or trial, something that doesn't happen in Venezuela. Guess personal freedom for Americans ends at the right to promote criminal activities, coups and the murder of democratically elected officials on TV. American assholes: go fuck yourselves.

    3. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Espectr0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Venezuelan here...

      Another "good" thing he is doing. 53 million lightbulbs have been replaced to fluorescent versions. An agreement with Vietnam was reached to start manufacturing the philips lightbulbs here. Vehicles will be able to run on natural gas soon, and the conversion will be free to users. They are testing solar panel use.

      I hate the guy, but i want those programs to succeed.

    4. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by fsmunoz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Following your logic - which is indeed a possibility - isn't it OK to assume that the USA will do the same with software made by US corporations and sold to Venezuela? And in that light, and not taking into account the liking or disliking of the respective governments, isn't it a matter of national security to stop using US made software in government computers?

      I'm mentioning this because I think this is the first concern they have, having their own brand of spyware can be a nice after effect. The second concern is the whole "Made in Venezuela, by contributions made from everyone!" which fits in their present ethos, a mix of nationalism and socialism (not a new mix, far from it).

    5. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by jcr · · Score: 1, Troll

      Chavez has an approval rating over 80%.

      According to polls conducted by his own ministry of propaganda. BTW, did you know that the repugnant little elvis impersonator who rules north korea is worshiped as a god by most of his subjects?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      North Corea didn't have an election in 2006, with international observers.

    7. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by fermion · · Score: 4, Informative
      The thing about personal freedom is life, liberty and the opportunity to peruse profit. Certainly, for what I have seen, the later is the missing part of the equation in south america, while the other two items are increasingly missing in a large part of north america. The ability to travel freely, to read what one wants to read, to engage in legal acts without being harassed are quickly falling to a populous that is more fearful of microrisk than concerned about macroliberties.

      OTOH, as I have seen time and time again, acess to technology increases ones ability to persue profit, i.e. happiness. The ability to use machines, and thus improve personal productivity, is the greatest asset one can have. The problem is that in many parts of the wold capital to acquire such technolgy is limit. There are no credit cards, or banks loans, or anything. Therefore anything that can be done to reduce the costs of technology to the point that an individual can purchase said technology from existing liquid assets means that the technolgy will not be just a toy for the rich, but a mover for the masses.

      And this is the reform that many in south america are trying to make. Many countries in south america are at the place where the US is moving toward. Money concentrated at the few, gated communities, aggressive police presence, inadequate medical service. It may be that 10% of the people in Venezuela controls 50% of the capital,which and 40% live in poverty. Just like in the US, if you can train a person to catch fish, and not just give him a fish, and also make the fishing pole affordable, then we can begin to help people pull themselves up by their own bootstraps without the dole. If a computer costs $200 instead of $400, then more people can save that over a year.

      Of course, US officials who have been on the dole and the take for their entire lives find this very scary, as the United States interests are going to be threatened by an educated and technical savvy population. Of course, if the US were not so afraid of an educated and technical savvy population, perhaps we would not have the trade deficit from which we currently suffer.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    8. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      Why do you hate Chavez?

      Is it because of American propaganda against him
      or is there any other concrete reason?

    9. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Read the post. "Venezuelan here." Most educated Venezuelans (including my wife) detest Chavez. It's only the poor that really adore him and he's such a populist politician much like Franklin D. Roosevelt (or so a passerby once described him). He gives citizenship to those who vote for him. He practically gives away / subsidizes food with a fraction of the huge oil profit the country is making (he's seized 90% of locally owned-land and nationalizing personal/international owned companies). He's also banned Venezuelan to buy the US dollar and Euro, thus driving down the worth of the Bolivar and screwing small business/export/import trade companies (which happen to be the backbone of any and including the good ol' US of A's economy). So...educating/feeding/housing the poor by...stealing from the middle class, foreign-owned companies (that help created an economy/investment in the first place) and disregarding property rights. The only two things I like about the guy (and most educated Venezuelans), is that he's at least helping the lower-class through his crazy socialist ideals (but screwing over the above mentioned) and he hates Bush with a socialist's vengeance...
      I won't go too much into the general corruption of the govt., because that was there way before him.

    10. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Frankie70 · · Score: 1


      Read the post. "Venezuelan here." Most educated Venezuelans (including my wife) detest Chavez. It's only the poor that really adore him and he's such a populist politician much like Franklin D. Roosevelt (or so a passerby once described him)


      Read here why the rich & influential in
      Venezuela dislike him.

    11. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Medgur · · Score: 1

      ... So why do you hate him?

      I know why Americans hate him (ZOMG, Socialist Dictator, Low-Class Ethnicity), why do you hate him?

    12. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by at_slashdot · · Score: 1

      Great, now the mercury in those flourescent bulbs will poison Venezuela...

      --
      "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." -- Prof. Dumbledore
    13. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by donaldm · · Score: 1

      While it is not difficult to put spyware in the Linux kernel it is also very easy to replace or recompile that kernel from source unlike other proprietary software.

      Any government contemplating putting spyware in the Linux kernel would have to be very stupid because to be found out and they will, would effectively result in a ban on all their computer exports, not to mention the embarrassment. I would not be surprised if Microsoft was one of the first companies to provide support to the GPL to actually achieve this ban, since they have the most to loose from cheap Linux computers

      --
      There ain't no such thing as proprietary standards only proprietary formats. Standards are by definition open.
    14. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      If Bush gave people tons of free stuff and 29 cent gasoline, he'd have an 80% approval rating too. The other 20% that pay the taxes to finance it would hate his guts.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    15. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, stop believing everything on CNN, and then you'll stop hating him.

    16. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1, Interesting

      ... So why do you hate him?

      I know why Americans hate him (ZOMG, Socialist Dictator, Low-Class Ethnicity), why do you hate him?

      Because not everyone wants to live under what many consider to be a borderline dictatorship?

      It's not as if you're allowed to oppose the guy if you're Venezuelan w/o repercussions. At least in North America and the EU, speaking out against political figures and government is not only legal, but gets you cred among ideologically like-minded people. You can still go to work the next day confident that you won't lose your job by government mandate. You can kick back in your house confident that someone won't kick in your door and drag you off to prison. In Venezuela, I suspect that such things ain't so guaranteed.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    17. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about because he is a priviliged capitalist.

    18. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      But Chavez isn't paying these benefits through taxes.

    19. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's so funny watching closed-minded people trying to wrestle with the conceptual breakdown of good and evil.

    20. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Cosmic+AC · · Score: 1

      US officials who have been on the dole and the take for their entire lives find this very scary, as the United States interests are going to be threatened by an educated and technical savvy population.
      Isn't "the dole" supposed to be welfare? I.E., not for the officials but the poor?

      Cheap computers do not an educated and technically savvy population make. Myspace is evidence of this.
    21. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Cosmic+AC · · Score: 1

      I forgot youtube. Egads!

    22. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, let's see.

      He's destroying the Venezuelan economy. Because that's what centralizing nationalizing socialism does. There's not a single case of it working anywhere, at any time in history; why the delusion it's going to work in Venezuela? The quadrupling of the price of oil from the 1998 price is paying for a lot of largess at the moment, but when (not if) either the price drops or the oil runs out, there are going to be serious problems.

      So, why is he doing that?

      Assuming he's not one of the idiots or madmen who actually thinks government-centralized economic planning can work, the motive left is power. Wealthy people and corporations not directly dependent on the State are an alternative power center, just as surely as independent media, opposition political parties, independent trade unions, or the like. And they're a lot easier to wipe out; socialism is a lot more respectable than open denial of civil rights. The only rational motive for Chavez's economic policies is that he wants to be absolute ruler of Venezuela in the same sense as Castro is absolute ruler of Cuba.

      Now, is there other evidence for that? Well, like others who have taken that path, he cultivates a cult of personality, he has a paramilitary organization (the Bolivarian Circles), he's gained the power to rule by decree, he shuts down opposition media, he praises and treats as a model others who have seized absolute power, and he incites hatred against convenient scapegoats. There's a lot of indicators there. Yeah, it might not be true, but you have to come up with a lot of special explanations for each and every one of them; Occam's Razor is that he's a budding President-for-Life.

      Of course, there's the outside chance that he actually is one of those deluded believers in state socialism, and is merely using these questionable means to what he sees as a benevolent end. In that case, he'll have to become a President-for-Life by necessity instead of ambition, because state socialism is so unworkable it can't be maintained in a free society.

      Of course, the suffering he'll wind up inflicting on Venezuela, in the end, will be the same. And the Left will blame all the suffering he inflicts on the US, of course.

    23. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Silkejr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Profit does not equal happiness.

    24. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because not everyone wants to live under what many consider to be a borderline dictatorship?

      It's not as if you're allowed to oppose the guy if you're Venezuelan w/o repercussions. At least in North America and the EU, speaking out against political figures and government is not only legal, but gets you cred among ideologically like-minded people. You can still go to work the next day confident that you won't lose your job by government mandate. You can kick back in your house confident that someone won't kick in your door and drag you off to prison. In Venezuela, I suspect that such things ain't so guaranteed.


      Don't believe everything you read. He's not perfect but Clearchannel's clients really don't like him so neither do you (and how do you feel about that).

      My understanding is that Chavez is very popular. He as been re-elected in internationally overseen elections (the US government is one of the very few countries that do not allow international overseers to ensure the elections are honest and fair). He got through a recall attempt with 59% of the popular vote (the US does not give the general electorate any way to recall or impeach a sitting president). The radio station which was "shut down" actually did not get its license renewed primarily because the owners were involved in the 2002 coup attempt where the democratically elected government was briefly overthrown by a corporate-led and US-backed junta.

      Chavez is also guilty of supplying low-income Americans with cheap heating oil and calling Bush "the devil".

      All in all, I would take a patriotic leader with "authoritarian tendencies" over a sadistic megalomaniac any day.

    25. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by nkv · · Score: 1

      At least in North America and the EU, speaking out against political figures and government is not only legal, but gets you cred among ideologically like-minded people.
      As long as you stay within the accepted limits of debate. Your views will be criticised as nonsensical and you won't be allowed on mainstream news channels (or if you are, you'll be "fox news"ed) - The 911 truth movement is an example. There's also the "ability" of the government to single you out for tax audits if you're a political opponent. So, it's not exactly a "free" society. You can even get jailed and tortured in this way. Here is an example.

      You can still go to work the next day confident that you won't lose your job by government mandate.
      Depending on what you say. Although not by "government mandate", there are other forces that can silence/control you in the United States. This is a recent example that's been on the news for a while now. The United States is not really run by the elected government anymore.

      I find it hard to believe that Americans oppose Chavez because he's a dictator and because he's supressing freedom in Venezuela. He's not perfect but he's trying to free his country and South America from external control and so, the bottom line is that he's not "standing in line".

    26. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

      Basically, you have regurgitated American propaganda. If you look to my original
      post, I asked for something other than American Propaganda.

    27. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Following your logic - which is indeed a possibility - isn't it OK to assume that the USA will do the same with software made by US corporations and sold to Venezuela? And in that light, and not taking into account the liking or disliking of the respective governments, isn't it a matter of national security to stop using US made software in government computers?

      To be honest, I've always wondered the same thing. Not so much recently, because I don't think the CIA and the NSA have the influence in big business that they used to have during the Cold War (IBM was notorious for being in bed with the NSA -- they got help designing some of their early crypto stuff from them, although there was never any sign of anything too untoward, admittedly), but if I was some paranoid dictatorial government on the USA's shit list, I'd probably be thinking twice about loading my PC up with some inscrutable binary objects procured from a company that's on very, very good terms with the USG.

      There are supposedly a bunch of universities and other alleged "disinterested parties" who have, or have had over the years, access to the actual Windows and other MS products' source code, but of course you never really know what goes into the stuff that you're running. It seems like just too good an avenue for an intelligence agency to pass up -- all sorts of governments, all over the world, dropping software that they really don't have any idea of the inner workings of, onto their employees' computers? I really suspect that in the future, there won't ever be quite an opportunity like that again (at least, I'd hope not).

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    28. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1
      How NSA access was built into Windows and Lotus Notes

      I'd be more worried about the Chinese side than Chavez, but yeah it's more than a remote possibility.

    29. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it hard to believe that Americans oppose Chavez because he's a dictator and because he's supressing freedom in Venezuela. He's not perfect but he's trying to free his country and South America from external control and so, the bottom line is that he's not "standing in line".

      I find it hard to believe, too, but then I see that the average American does not want to process the news for themselves but relies on the news network and then I see what little stink the networks raise over what Bush has done compared to Clinton lying about getting a blow job (why was it an issue anyway?), then I'm not so surprised anymore.

    30. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While, technically good, let us not have an Olbermann badmouth any OS founder: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdD6op0l2jk

      And, why is personal freedom gone wih FSF?

    31. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by rajafarian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I stopped reading your post after I read, "... acess to technology increases ones ability to persue profit, i.e. happiness." Not that you care anyway, I'm sure.

    32. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by ultranova · · Score: 1

      He's destroying the Venezuelan economy. Because that's what centralizing nationalizing socialism does. There's not a single case of it working anywhere, at any time in history; why the delusion it's going to work in Venezuela?

      Actually, there are such examples. For example, Russia was an agricultural backwater who's economy and political system were destroyed by WW1. Soviet Russia was a world-class superpower who's economy outlasted Nazi Germany. Now, this change may or may not be due to socialism, but the fact remains that Soviet Russia had a lot stronger economy than the preceding Tzarist Russia.

      It should also be noted that most european countries implement various degrees of socialism, and are doing just fine. Finland, for example, was very left-leaning until recently and transitioned from agrarian to industrial society; on the other hand, once state regulation was lessened, the economy collapsed and still hasn't really recovered.

      Finally: in Soviet Russia the government owns the industry, in Capitalist America the industry owns the government. Communism or fascism, pick your poison.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    33. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by deKernel · · Score: 0

      Soviet Russia was a world-class superpower who's economy outlasted Nazi Germany. That is not really saying much since Nazi Germany only lasted no more than 20 years.

      It should also be noted that most european countries implement various degrees of socialism, and are doing just fine. Are doing just fine? Nothing like settling for the lowest common denominator. Instead, why don't they just push for a system that promotes success. That recipe is always good and works, and YES it is not perfect. Any form of communism and he is a communist just does not work. In the end, the country will have a few strong areas, but by and large, it will not be a success story.
    34. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by couchslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      " where personal freedom is gone."

      It really depends on the end result.
      For example, there would have been no way to oust foreign influence and weld China beck together without something like Maoism. Processes to build a modern nation from divided countries with backward populations are often bloody. Old structures must be smashed and unity forged by force.
      In the very short time since 1948, China went from warlordism and anarchy to economic and military powerhouse. Revolutionaries understand this. (I am NOT praising Communist economics, merely their willingness to destroy old bad systems.)
      Communism can propel a country into the modern age, force educational reform, weaken the hold of religion=superstition, and perform many useful transitional functions.
      OTOH, democracy is only good when there are educated people who embrace secularist ideals to operate it. Otherwise, democracy will merely serve as a vehicle for its own destruction (Iraq). People who believe the universe is a religious monarchy cannot believe in freedom from religion under a secular government.
      I would like to see a few more Leftist, anti-religious revolutions stir the pot. I'm unfashionably right-wing myself, but the Leftists are anti-tribalist and anti-religion. I regard them as a force for healthy destruction.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    35. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      "The radio station which was "shut down" actually did not get its license renewed primarily because the owners were involved in the 2002 coup attempt where the democratically elected government was briefly overthrown by a corporate-led and US-backed junta."

      First, it's a TV station who got its license pulled - it was not shut down, but forbidden to use radio waves for transmission. And second, being opposition (as in being involved in a coup) is hardly grounds for punishing an organization. If such act is defined in Venezuelan law (and Chávez was, himself, in a coup back in 1992), then the _individuals_ involved should be brought to justice - like he was - he went to jail until being pardoned by then president in 1994.

      I wonder why so many Chávez supporters are ACs...

    36. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Sometimes it is fun to play with constitutional constructivism and take it back to the declaration of independence. Life and liberty is pretty straight foward, but what is happiness? Well the colonies were stuck under rule of the monarch and the nobility, and few who were not one of these could really make a personal profit on a days work, i.e. be better off at the end of the day than at the beginning. Not only that, one could worse off as the king could take all your stuff without oversight. So, according to some, this idea that any man should be able to profit from his work, i.e. work his way to a position in life that he found acceptable, was called the persuit of happiness. There was no guarantee that the work would pay off, but at least the king would not be able to keep you down.

      There are many artifacts of this concern in the constitution. The right to bear arms. The limits on the government from taking. Now, however, and this is where the parent might be coming from, we are are back to a world in which an oligarchy collects most of the profits, and the majority only collect the trickle down crumbs. Increasingly, even those that calls themselves conservatives, write laws that give the government the right to take without any oversight. So no, profit does not equal happiness, and it is easy to take that idealistic tact while we are sitting in our comfortable rooms, with our computers, and probably at least ramen noodles to eat, because we or our parents had enough access to capital, and the freedom to invest it as we wish, and the opportunity to work and keep much of our earning, and have the rest invested in public good rather than in socks for the royal family,

    37. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      Indeed, my opinion exactly. Do note that I'm not shouting "OMG bad USA"; I'm not an American but I'm no hypocrite: if the posibility is there, I think that they should consider using it. Spying isn't a "clean" business anywhere. I remeber that Digital also made some interesting stuff for the US, mainly because their chips were being cloned by the Reds :). Anyone in Europe that worked for an American country signs a document stating that certain countries are off-limits.

      The Heimdal version of kerberos appeared because of lack of crypto in MIT Kerberos at the time, due to export restrictions. What I was saying is that I ended up heading IT decisions for a government in the USA shitlist (will not happen because nobody votes for me, amongst other things) I would try to minimize reliance on closed software from US companies. Not because it's the USA, but because to be completely honest I would probably do the same if the foot was in the other shoe and the beneficts were deemed good enough. With Linux or BSD this "risk" is lower if the distribution channels remain open: at most it gives insight on possible exploits, but it levels the field in spyware. If the actual source is "closed" in some way the risk are the same though.

    38. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      Thanks for your answer, I had forgotten the Lotus Notes one.

      And you raise an angle I had not seen: the Chinese involved in this do seem more "prepared" to pull this kind of stuff. And what's more, even if they get caught nothing happens :)

    39. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Watson+Ladd · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the slaves of the south. "We can't set you free because that would interfere with your owner's right to a profit."

      --
      Inventions have long since reached their limit, and I see no hope for further development.-- Frontinus, 1st cent. AD
    40. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a hypothetical question: if a United States television station was actively supporting an in-process military coup against the sitting United States President and the coup failed, do you think the US government would have a "hands off" policy towards said television station and merely not renew its over-the-air broadcast license when it comes up for renewal, or do you think they would swiftly raid and shut down the station and place the execuitives and operators under arrest for sedition? Or do you think perhaps another outcome would be more probable?

    41. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which is essentially wal marts response everytime they end up in court. Fortunately this country was founded on the principle that every person should have a right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and fortunately the definition of a person is increasing. Unfortunately, conservatives tend to believe that some person, mostly corporations, are more equal than everyone else.

    42. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      As long as you stay within the accepted limits of debate.

      The "limits" usually involve impinging on others' rights (e.g. committing libel/slander for debate points is generally considered bad form).

      Your views will be criticised as nonsensical and you won't be allowed on mainstream news channels (or if you are, you'll be "fox news"ed) - The 911 truth movement is an example.

      No, your views can be criticized as nonsensical if those people (or private organizations) who hear your points believe them to be nonsensical. This has nothing to do with government edict or policy. Point is, you're still perfectly allowed to speak them w/o governmental interference.

      There's also the "ability" of the government to single you out for tax audits if you're a political opponent.

      Heh - I'm sorely tempted to mention a correlation between that statement and tinfoil, but... I have merely to use simple logic: If that's true, then how come the application of these dreaded IRS audits aren't consistently applied? After all, if the big evil government is so eager to 'silence' opponents, then we'd have certainly seen more than mere statistical coincidence, no?

      So, it's not exactly a "free" society. You can even get jailed and tortured in this way. Here is an example.

      Long on sensationalism, short on facts (such as the list of charges, the court papers, the jury verdict --you know a jury is involved, yes?-- things like that). Got anything that actually shows the whole story, and not just cherry-picked bits and pieces? After all, if there are so many systemic examples, surely one of them would be available that would lend better credibility than the ravings of a single individual.

      Depending on what you say. Although not by "government mandate", there are other forces that can silence/control you in the United States.

      I shall quote from the article you point to: " He had been offered lifelong tenure by the political science department of the Catholic DePaul University in Chicago, but faced with a bitter campaign against him, the university denied him the post."

      No governmental mandate there. In fact, it shows that there was lots of free speech in action at that particular university. It is also worthwhile to note that the university is likely privately-funded, so there is a high likelihood that there is zero governmental involvement there.

      You're not guaranteed to have a job in academia, you know.

      I find it hard to believe that Americans oppose Chavez because he's a dictator and because he's supressing freedom in Venezuela.

      Why?

      He's not perfect but he's trying to free his country and South America from external control and so, the bottom line is that he's not "standing in line".

      At risk of invoking Godwin's Law, there was a certain other national eader in history whose big premise and push was to free his people from external control as well (e.g. the then-ongoing punishments of the Versailles Treaty), and was very eager to give goodies to his people (e.g. the Volkswagen... which literally translates to "The Peoples' Vehicle").

      Road to Hell { Good Intentions, etc.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    43. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's "American Propaganda" to note that centrally planned socialism doesn't work, then apparently "American Propaganda" means "observable fact".
      If it's "American Propaganda" to note that the Bolivarian Circles exist, then apparently "American Propaganda" means "observable fact".
      If it's "American Propaganda" to note that Chavez has the power to rule by decree, then apparently "American Propaganda" means "observable fact".
      If it's "American Propaganda" to note that RCTV has been shut down, then apparently "American Propaganda" means "observable fact".
      If it's "American Propaganda" to note that Chavez regularly rails against the elites and the United States, then apparently "American Propaganda" means "observable fact".
      If it's "American Propaganda" to note that Chavez has praised Castro, then apparently "American Propaganda" means "observable fact".
      If it's "American Propaganda" to note that Chavez cultivates a personality cult (for example, with his TV broadcasts), then apparently "American Propaganda" means "observable fact".
      If it's "American Propaganda" to note that historically, people who do these things try to become absolute rulesr, then apparently "American Propaganda" means "observable fact".

      And if you dismiss observable facts as "American Propaganda", then it's clear you've already decided to ignore any actual reasons for disliking Chavez that can be honestly promoted. In which case you cannot be convinced . . . but hopefully others reading the exchange will see your dishonesty.

    44. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, people are already being poisoned by the goverment media.

    45. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, gasoline costs 3 cent of USD a liter, I fill my SUV's tank for 1.5 USD.
      But I'd rather pay 50 USD for filling the tank than having a lunatic in the goverment.

    46. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if you're going to see this comment, Penguinisto, but I must say, I find your views intriguing. I myself, as an American, view our current administration as a borderline dictatorship, and while I hear propaganda all the time about Chavez, I've never heard that position from somebody who lives there before.

      I think the main reason the American revolution worked is that General Washington stepped down. I hope Chavez shows the same wisdom. But right now, what I see happening in Venezuela is that Chavez' government is doing good things for the country whereas the right-wing kleptocrats who preceded him did whatever we told them to (after painstakingly trying to ignore all the anti-chavez propaganda we are deluged with here).

      Please tell us more about what it's like to be caught up in a socialist revolution.

    47. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather pay 50 USD for filling the tank than having a lunatic in the goverment. Well come on up to the US and see how we have it here; our government is composed almost entirely of lunatics, and it costs me damn near 50 bucks to fill up my tank.
    48. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You can kick back in your house confident that someone won't kick in your door and drag you off to prison. In Venezuela, I suspect that such things ain't so guaranteed.
      I don't suppose you have any evidence to back up that wild surmise do you?
      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    49. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      I myself, as an American, view our current administration as a borderline dictatorship, and while I hear propaganda all the time about Chavez, I've never heard that position from somebody who lives there before.

      1) The very fact that dissent is very much alive and well in the US is proof enough that no such thing is occurring here.

      2) Talk to someone from Venezuela sometime... while there are not (yet) stories of such things, the fear is certainly there and credible.

      I think the main reason the American revolution worked is that General Washington stepped down. I hope Chavez shows the same wisdom.

      I like the comparison you took, but... it's missing something. While Washington refused to be installed as King (in spite of popular opinion that he should become royalty), Washington also worked within the system as president, and abided by it. He refused to use the infant US gov't as a plaything, as Chavez is doing now w/ his gov't (one example: taking over state oil companies and replacing their mgmt. and R&D personnel w/ political cronies).

      But right now, what I see happening in Venezuela is that Chavez' government is doing good things for the country whereas the right-wing kleptocrats who preceded him did whatever we told them to.

      I agree that his predecessors were asshats; there's no doubt about that. But, Chavez does things which make him look good on the surface, yet beneath it reeks of junta-like actions and power consolidation. Something eerily similar happened in mid-1930's Germany, if you want a parallel.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    50. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't stuff he's doing. Some counselor tells him this project is good and he goes with it.

      CAPTCHA: Hitching a ride nowhere

    51. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yes, I am as eager as you to be poisoned by that mercury when the ignorants throw away their fluorescent bulbs to our rivers.

      Stupidity at its best.

    52. Re:As much as I hate Chavez... by ksheff · · Score: 1

      But if Bush did the same thing, he would. Also if Chavez is diverting oil royalties that would otherwise go towards paying something else, it's not much different than directly using taxes to pay off the public.

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  6. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    This is becaus the United States would rather deal with and give their oil dollars to middle east regimes that support terrorists than to an American socialist state. You see terrorisum is not the big evil, Socalisum is.

  7. The Only Problem by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1, Funny

    The only problem is, they also come with Hugo Chavez spyware preinstalled. But he tells us, that's all right.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  8. Congratulations by Gryle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While my personal feelings regarding Mr Chavez are mixed, this is a great idea. He's attempting to grow an industry within his country and using open-source software to do it. It's always good to see Linux moving beyond the nerds into the hands of (for lack of a better term) common people.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    1. Re:Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup... grow an industry to fund his regime and make him more powerful. And OSS has given him the freedom (as in beer and speach) to do so.

    2. Re:Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting ass AC since I'm at work, but for a closer analogy of what good this type of governmental measure can have, here in Quebec in 2001 our internet usage was about 40 % lower per capita than in the States. The provincial government subsidized the cost of internet connections at a rate of about 70% for 2 years. Our internet usage went up higher than the States in those 2 years, and our ISPs upgraded their networks at a crazy pace. In 2001 my DSL speeds were 1024 / 160, in 2003 1728 / 384, in 2004 3008 / 800, and today 5000 / 800 for 35$ US a month, for the same price, same connection type, no bandwidth limit. And this is with Canada's largest ISP (sympatico). Methinks some government direction can be good at times!

  9. s/Cuba/Venezuela/g by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U.S. President John F. Kennedy at an August 29, 1962 news conference:

    "The Monroe Doctrine means what it has meant since President Monroe and John Quincy Adams enunciated it, and that is that we would oppose a foreign power extending its power to the Western Hemisphere, and that is why we oppose what is happening in Cuba today. That is why we have cut off our trade. That is why we worked in the Organization of American States and in other ways to isolate the Communist menace in Cuba. That is why we will continue to give a good deal of our effort and attention to it.

    1. Re:s/Cuba/Venezuela/g by nebulus4 · · Score: 0

      Kennedy was referring to Soviet, which as you know was partly in Europe. There's absolutely nothing in doctrine that mentions Asian nations. The three main ideas of the doctrine were:

      1. It conveys that European countries cannot colonize in any of the Americas: North, Central, or South as well as islands of the Caribbean which were considered to be a part of the Americas.
      2. It enforces Washington's rule of foreign policy, in which the U.S. will only be involved in European affairs if America's rights are disturbed.
      3. Third, the U.S. will consider any attempt at colonization a threat to its national security.
      --
      "It would be wrong to refuse to face the fact that everything is fundamentally sick and sad."
    2. Re:s/Cuba/Venezuela/g by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1
      Don't forget the Roosevelt Corollary where the US extendeds those powers to become the de-facto world police.

      "Chronic wrongdoing, or an impotence which results in a general loosening of the ties of civilized society, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an international police power."

      Hang on, let me check... Chronic wrongdoing -tick-, impotence loosening ties of civilized society -tick-, in America -tick-... for the good of America the world must exercise its international police powers and save you all from yourselves!

  10. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are delusional, I'm afraid. These "US and European businesses" you refer to do not exist -- multinational corporations have no national allegiances, they do what is best for their quarterly profit.

    Besides which, how is a Chinese corporation operating in Venezuela the same as the Chinese government meddling in the oil supply? Furthermore, since when did the Monroe Doctrine apply to Asian nations? And third, where the hell do Americans get off claiming Venezuelan oil for themselves?

  11. Chavez needs to work on his math. by keyed · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The price of other similar brands is US$ 930, and the price of our computer is US$ 690, almost 40% less

    $690 is nowhere near 60% of $930. It's closer to 75%.
    Of course, 25% wouldn't sound impressive to the masses.
    1. Re:Chavez needs to work on his math. by Kopiok · · Score: 1

      It is about 74%, actually.

      Anyway, I want to see some specs on that thing. $930 seems a lot for a "consumer computer". I see that you can buy a decent Dell for US$499 that will do everything you'd need for a basic home computer, and that includes Vista.

    2. Re:Chavez needs to work on his math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price of our computer is US$ 690, and the price of other similar brands is US$ 930, almost 40% more.

      Now it makes sense mathematically, dosn't it?

    3. Re:Chavez needs to work on his math. by wishmechaos · · Score: 1

      FYI, computers are much cheaper in the States, mostly due to the lack of import taxes. Here in Argentina there's a 50% import tax, so that 499 dell becomes a 750, plus transport fees and the reseller's share, you're not really far away from $930.

    4. Re:Chavez needs to work on his math. by seriesrover · · Score: 1

      And the government control how much that import tax is. Point is, these government sanctioned computers are ONLY 40% cheaper (actually 25% if you do the math) because of the government, not because of private initiatives etc.

    5. Re:Chavez needs to work on his math. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > It's closer to 75%.

      > It is about 74%, actually.

      Actually, it is closer to 74.2%.

  12. I wonder how long... by Seakip18 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    it will be till somebody pokes around the prepackage and finds it able to only load approved state software, calls home, etc. It is good to see a government spreading technology at an affordable price and not entirely gimping them. Even better that they are encouraging a good OS. The site with TFA is also a bit too, um, "orientated" to support whatever Chavez's Gov't spits out. Take a look at the article
    "Venezuela, RCTV, And Media Freedom: Just The Facts, Please".

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
    1. Re:I wonder how long... by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      it will be till somebody pokes around the prepackage and finds it able to only load approved state software, calls home, etc.

      And just like copy protection, it will be removed when some kid with one figures it out. Since it is Linux and not the other OS, he has sources and can replace and learn whatever is needed to do this.

      Although I hate dictators, once an awhile you actually might get a good one. Chavez might be a good one if he educates his people and boot straps his people into this century. At which point, with education, they may become a thriving democracy. Remember, you need to be literate and educated to some minimal level to understand the need for democracy and liberty. While your just trying to survive, neither concept means a damn.

    2. Re:I wonder how long... by morefacts · · Score: 1
      Also take a look at other articulate and well-researched critiques of Chavez at Caracas Chronicles Reader's Guide to Venezuela at: http://caracaschronicles.blogspot.com/2005/10/read ers-guide-to-venezuela-in-chavez.html

      A particularly interesting piece details an alternative version of the April 2002 events. It outlines the significance of the Plan Avila, a form of martial law that Chavez intended to impose during the crisis, and the refusal of his military command to institute the plan.

      Excerpts:

      "Not surprisingly, the order to activate Plan Avila set off alarm bells in the military establishment. If the plan had been controversial in 1989, when it was deployed to control violent looting by armed groups of people, its application against a huge political march made up largely of unarmed civilians threatened a Tiananmen Square style political massacre... To their unending credit, the two key military officers at the top of the Plan Avila chain of command simply refused to follow the president's orders. As confirmed by the subsequent hearings in the National Assembly, this is the key decision that set off the chain of events that weekend." http://caracaschronicles.blogspot.com/2004/04/unto ld-story-of-venezuelas-2002-april.html

    3. Re:I wonder how long... by Seakip18 · · Score: 1

      Oh man. My first Troll and informative mod. This a journal entry in the making. I do agree that, yes, the OS will be a good move, allowing those who want to disable possible software to do so easily. How many of those that are able to afford these pc's are going just use it? They'll simply use that computer, not have to reformat, etc just to get rid of stuff. However, the fact the gov't is actually trying to get it's people caught up is to be applauded.

      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
  13. This isn't the troll you are looking for by megaditto · · Score: 1

    I am curious, would the fanboys like you also praise satan for adopting FOSS/linux to control the fuel delivery and batch-processing of the new arrivals?

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    1. Re:This isn't the troll you are looking for by pjay_dml · · Score: 4, Funny

      As if Bush would ever support software freedom.

    2. Re:This isn't the troll you are looking for by morari · · Score: 1

      Cut out the middleman, vote "Satan"!

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    3. Re:This isn't the troll you are looking for by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      I am curious, would the fanboys like you also praise satan for adopting FOSS/linux to control the fuel delivery and batch-processing of the new arrivals?

      OSS is a form of freedom by its nature... any kind of freedom that is introduced in a dictatorship is a good thing.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    4. Re:This isn't the troll you are looking for by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      what good is the freedom to recompile your kernel if asking for the source code is an executable offense?

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    5. Re:This isn't the troll you are looking for by value_added · · Score: 1

      As if Bush would ever support software freedom.

      As if Bush would understand the concept of freedom, or software.

    6. Re:This isn't the troll you are looking for by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Yes, as long as he opposes The Spanish Inquisition too. And allows me to rent a nice air-conditioned room with all the basic necessities for an affordable price in hell.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    7. Re:This isn't the troll you are looking for by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure he would. Since "freedom" means "freedom for businesses to make incredible sums of money", "software freedom" means "freedom for businesses to make money selling software."

      Really, what other sort of freedom is worth pursuing?

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    8. Re:This isn't the troll you are looking for by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      what good is the freedom to recompile your kernel if asking for the source code is an executable offense?

      If you cannot gain it freely, then the GPL is being violated.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  14. Re:How is this news? by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

    We all already new linux users are a bunch of commies

    Ahh, but not all commies are yet Linux users. There is still an untapped market of commies that use Windows (Gasp! How can anyone read the "Criticism of Gotha and Erfurt Program" and do that is beyond me!) or OSX - these more popular in the agit-prop subculture of commies, they design posters calling for general strikes in it because they want "colour calibration". Or so they say, still smells like burgeoise behaviour, bloody revisionists.

  15. Rebranded as... by Tablizer · · Score: 0

    Communux

  16. Pictured equipment by Mazin07 · · Score: 0

    Ah, forget about making any decent use of the pictured webcam in Linux. Drivers, video4linux, skype, nothing works. This is a good excuse to preload lots of pirated copies of Windows while not paying Microsoft for OEM Windows, though.

    1. Re:Pictured equipment by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      Ah, forget about making any decent use of the pictured webcam in Linux. Drivers, video4linux, skype, nothing works. This is a good excuse to preload lots of pirated copies of Windows while not paying Microsoft for OEM Windows, though.

      I am sure Microsoft will make it easy to pirate it to keep market share, also to maintain and keep North American prices artificially high. Maybe our next web cam (with Linux drivers) will come from them as they will not fear the M$ FUD.

  17. U.S. Exports by narced · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    As much as I hate M$... and I really hate M$ a lot... I am a U.S. Citizen and Microsoft is a North American company bringing money into the U.S. from other countries. I realize that Mexico is a small percentage of the U.S. exports, but still, when I worked at HP we courted to them because they were a good export base (about 4% of our sales were in Mexico). Lets face it, we need exports to stay competitive.

    So I am torn on this topic. I love Linux and free open source software and I want M$ to die a fast death, yet I want U.S. exports to remain high. I realize that U.S. made laptops are really made in Asia (Compal, Quantus, etc.), but there is still a nice cut made for our economy (such as my salary).

    I have to say that when the whole of this is considered, it is a net negative for the U.S. That is just my $0.02.

    1. Re:U.S. Exports by JanneM · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is a North American company bringing money into the U.S. from other countries

      Not being from the US, I'm not torn at all. If I have to give money to a foreign economy I would much rather the money goes to a poor but aspiring economy where the work and the economic improvement makes a very significant improvement in the quality of life for a lot of people, than further feeding an economy that is already the largest in the world.

      In fact, given the choice I certainly prefer getting stuff or services originating in China, India or the other aspiring economies than buying it from the US, Europe or Japan.

      I have to say that when the whole of this is considered, it is a net negative for the U.S.

      But a net positive for the world.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:U.S. Exports by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      It's been awhile since I've fed a troll so pardon me I'm a bit rusty. If I have to give money to a foreign economy I would much rather the money goes to a poor but aspiring economy where the work and the economic improvement makes a very significant improvement in the quality of life for a lot of people, than further feeding an economy that is already the largest in the world.
      As an american I am torn about exporting cures and aid to fight diseases since people outside of the US hold the following belief,"I have to say that when the whole of this is considered, it is a net negative for the U.S. But a net positive for the world."
        PS. When one of your neighbors gets uppity and decides he likes your land, resources, etc., Please don't go crying to any of the 5 perm. UN Sec. Council members located in the US or Europe.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    3. Re:U.S. Exports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, then, if your country supported freedom of the people over freedom of mega-corporations to rape and pillage, then we wouldn't be in this mess, would we?

      America is at the BOTTOM of the pile in technology freedom. I work as a freelancer in the global market, and can talk to both users and clients in Israel, Romania, Australia, India - you name it. Mention Linux, and everybody's at least *heard* of it! Mention Linux on the street in America, your response will be one of:

      90% (a) what the hell is that?
      5% (b) Oh, you're one of those Godless Communists Microsoft warned me about!
      5% (c) Oh, you're one of those hacker people. Help! Police! Hacker!

      Meanwhile, many countries even have their own distro, just because it's the only way to get decent support for their native language. Other countries use it because they don't want to kowtow to the monopoly that's draining their pockets. Or for any number of other practical reasons. Yes, even because they just plain like freedom (not an American-patented concept)!

      And if they use proprietary software, in about half the cases it's pirated anyway.

    4. Re:U.S. Exports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PS. When one of your neighbors gets uppity and decides he likes your land, resources, etc., Please don't go crying to any of the 5 perm. UN Sec. Council members located in the US or Europe.

      Good advice. They might decide that they like your land, resources, etc. Next thing you know you've got a permanent military and para-military presence and the largest military base in history in your capital (with, in a wonderful example of a public-private partnership, it's private sector bookend in Abu Dhabi).

      Speaking of "permanent members" how can you be thirty years behind on your UN dues and still sit on the permanent council.

      As for aid, studies have shown that African nations without US "aid" are economically FAR better off than those taking it.

    5. Re:U.S. Exports by JanneM · · Score: 1

      I am saying that the same money going into expanding, say, the Venezuelan economy on one hand or the US economy on the other, is going to improve the life of more people - and be more significant improvement - in the first case than in the second.

      If you think acting on that observation is bad then so be it; I can't change that attitude and I'm certainly not going to waste my time trying.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    6. Re:U.S. Exports by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      the same money going into expanding, say, the Venezuelan economy on one hand or the US economy on the other, is going to improve the life of more people - and be more significant improvement - in the first case than in the second.
      Not necessarily true at all. A large portion of it's likely to get siphoned off by Chavez and his cronies.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  18. In Soviet Russia...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Venezuela is spelled Venezula!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am with Linus Tovalds on this debate. I couldn't agree more with his position on this one.

  19. Volkswagen by jcr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Somehow, I don't think these computers will go on to become a commercial success after the dictator dies.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:Volkswagen by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      You can dislike the man, but he isn't a dictator. He could eventually become one, he wouldn't be the first, but to call him that at this point is banalizing the word. Sort of like terrorist.

    2. Re:Volkswagen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can dislike the man, but he isn't a dictator. He could eventually become one, he wouldn't be the first, but to call him that at this point is banalizing the word. Sort of like terrorist.

      Really? He has complete power to do what he wants, rules by fiat, throws his opponents in jail, denies freedom of speech, seizes private property, and is on the verge of being declared el presidente for life.

      If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's likely to be a duck.

    3. Re:Volkswagen by jcr · · Score: 1

      he isn't a dictator.

      tell it to the people who used to watch the TV station he shut down.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:Volkswagen by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      Except that everything you just said was either a lie or irrelevant due to it being standard practice. You also threw in a bit of Spanish to give it that xenophobic flavour.

    5. Re:Volkswagen by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      he isn't a dictator.
      tell it to the people who used to watch the TV station he shut down.
      You mean the TV station that backed the coup that briefly removed the democratically elected Chávez and replaced him with a military dictatorship? They already know what Chávez is and what they themselves are.
    6. Re:Volkswagen by Gocho · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another venezuelan here

            For "ending the contract" as the venezuelan government so euphemistically puts it, there had to be a trial for those allegations (supporting the coup, being "in bed with the imperialists!" and other nonsense) and RCTV had to be found guilty. If there was no prosecution, the contract had to be automatically renewed for 20 years. Now, not only such trial never took place but it was based solely on what Chavez accused RCTV of doing during his TV show. On top of that, the Supreme Court (which was increased in number from 12 to 30 members in order to assure Chavez he will always get it his way) ruled that all of RCTV's equipment was to be used by the new, government-based TVES station with no right to compensation.

            Now, if it walks like a duck... you can't call it a cat. This was an illegal closing of a dissenting media outlet AND a nationalization ("stealing", as I'd like to call it) of a company with the highest rating in the country and one of only two with a view different from the regime.

            A while ago, a high-ranking government official declared that the CIA and "the gringos" were spying on venezuelans thru their Directv antennas... that's the level of lunacy and paranoia surrounding the guy....

    7. Re:Volkswagen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nationalization ("stealing", as I'd like to call it)
      Suddenly the reason for you opposition to this man becomes obvious. The suggestion that nationalization of corperate assets is illegitimate is laughable, you do NOT have the freedom to exploit people. And a little side note, DirecTV is ultimatly controlled by News Corp. (as in Fox News), a suggestion that this company has some sort of sinister motive is hardly laughable.

    8. Re:Volkswagen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shrub has complete power to do what he wants, rules by fiat, throws his opponents in jail, denies freedom of speech, seizes private property, and is on the verge of being declared el presidente for life via executive order bypassing the constitution.

      If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's likely to be a duck. There, fixed it for you. :D
    9. Re:Volkswagen by Gocho · · Score: 1

      Nationalizing an industry under Venezuelan law is allowed as long as the company being nationalized is compensated. In this regard, nationalizing is seen almost as "Eminent Domain" in the United States. RCTV was never compensated and, Chavez dixit, will never be compensated. In this light, calling the seizure of the equipment anything other than stealing IS laughable.

      The comment about Directv spying on venezuelans certainly becomes laughable when the explanation given was that "the antennas are able to record what goes on in the bedroom and beam it to the pentagon" followed by the advice of making sure "not to walk by the TV while naked".

    10. Re:Volkswagen by jcr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      "the TV station that backed the coup"

      They "backed" the coup? Horrors! You mean, they had the affrontery to express an opinion?

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    11. Re:Volkswagen by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      "the TV station that backed the coup"

      They "backed" the coup? Horrors! You mean, they had the affrontery to express an opinion?

      -jcr

      Express that sort of "opinion" in the US and you'll find yourself in Guantánamo.
    12. Re:Volkswagen by EQ · · Score: 1

      "Express that sort of "opinion" in the US and you'll find yourself in Guantánamo."

      Bullshit.

      Radio Pacifica is one such counter example.

      Black Swan to your idiotic post.

      --
      Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo! http://goo.gl/J9bkO
    13. Re:Volkswagen by jcr · · Score: 1

      Express that sort of "opinion" in the US and you'll find yourself in Guantánamo.

      Bullshit. My grandfather did time for protesting WW I, and if GWB were as much of an authoritarian as Woodrow Wilson, then all the pinkos walking around with their "bush=hitler" signs would be cooling their heels in a jail cell.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    14. Re:Volkswagen by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      "Opinion" was in quotation marks because we are not talking about opinions here. We are talking about a broadcaster playing a major role in an armed uprising. There is no way they would be allowed to continue to exist if such a thing occurred in the USA. Guantánamo is full of people who have done much, much less.

    15. Re:Volkswagen by guabah · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I don't think these computers will go on to become a commercial success after the dictator dies.

      -jcr

      Oh yeah, and the Bug wasn't in production for 60 years after Hitler

  20. All the irrational replies explained by Space+Coyote · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    ___
    Cogito cogito, ergo cogito sum.
    1. Re:All the irrational replies explained by jZnat · · Score: 1

      So the reason a lot of Americans hate him is because of neo-cons' lies as usual? Man, what the fuck is going on here?

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    2. Re:All the irrational replies explained by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      Well, no, that doesn't explain everything about Chavez hatred.

      1. Chavez is best buds with the dictators and thugs who rule Cuba, China, Zimbabwe, Iran, etc. If your country is a human rights nightmare, an economic backwater, and/or a one-party state, Chavez will speak well of you, while blaming all problems on the USA. Is it any wonder Americans don't like him?
      2. Chavez began hating the USA long before anyone here had ever heard of him. Is it a surprise if there's hatred directed back at him?

      But regardless of the software or other details, this is all still autarky and, even worse, central planning. Chavez is clearly ignorant of the fact that in the 20th century, central planning failed everywhere and produced 100 million corpses in the process. In addition to the 0% record in practice, the theory has been totally demolished by people like Mises, Hayek, and Friedman. Among present-day economists, central planning is about as popular and respected as the phlogiston theory of combustion is among chemists. No matter what Linux-friendly, appealing-sounding program he tries, the fact that he's determined to run the economy according to these ideas means it's doomed to crash and burn. The only questions are how soon and how hard.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    3. Re:All the irrational replies explained by Greg+Lindahl · · Score: 1

      It is the job of Venezuelans to love or hate him. It is the job of Americans to pity Venezuela for letting its democracy be hijacked by this guy.

      Fortunately, it seems that the destruction of RCTV is beginning to cause some good political processes.

      -- greg

    4. Re:All the irrational replies explained by cooldev · · Score: 1

      Whenever you vote for something, there's one thing you should keep in mind: someday people with a different opinion will be in power. Therefore, before you grant powers to a government you may be favorable to, consider that a few years or decades later, those exact same powers may be used against you.

    5. Re:All the irrational replies explained by Whiney+Mac+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Chavez is clearly ignorant of the fact that in the 20th century, central planning failed everywhere and produced 100 million corpses in the process

      Central planning failed everywhere? Singapore? Nordic countries?

      --
      There are shills on slashdot. Apparently, I'm one of them.
    6. Re:All the irrational replies explained by PapayaSF · · Score: 2

      Central planning failed everywhere? Singapore? Nordic countries?

      They are not centrally-planned economies, not by most standards, at least. They have meddled with the market as all governments are wont to do, but not on the scale of nationalizing entire industries, etc.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    7. Re:All the irrational replies explained by Weston+O'Reilly · · Score: 1

      What irrational replies? I've seen maybe 3 vaguely anti-Chavez posts in this thread. This is one big Chavez love fest going on here. Shutting down a news outlet? Oh, that's ok, it was just the "Fox News of South America!" Where is your supposed reverence for free-speech-all-else-be-damned?

    8. Re:All the irrational replies explained by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      It's not like the previous government was doing so well. There's good reasons that he came to power.

      The station supported the coup attempt. If Fox and Fox News supported an illegal attempt to overthrow the US government, they might get in trouble with the FCC.

    9. Re:All the irrational replies explained by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      Chavez is just following the policy of "the enemy of my enemy is my friend." Sound familiar?

      I don't like either case, but Chavez has less power and fewer options than the USA.

      As for central planning, it will never be as efficient as free markets. But consider how the USSR's central planning would have gone if it had Walmart's computing power, data analysis, demand prediction programs, and supplier controls and communication. Walmart does a tremendous job of centrally planning its stores. It has to forecast what people need and will consume, just like Stalin needed to.

    10. Re:All the irrational replies explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chavez is best buds with the dictators and thugs who rule Cuba, China, Zimbabwe, Iran, etc. If your country is a human rights nightmare, an economic backwater, and/or a one-party state, Chavez will speak well of you, while blaming all problems on the USA. Is it any wonder Americans don't like him?

      Red herring, specially knowing the special ties that countries like the US have with dictatorships like Pakistan and, oddly enough, Zimbabwe and China. Heck, the US is personally responsible for putting quite a few of those dictators into power.

      Chavez began hating the USA long before anyone here had ever heard of him. Is it a surprise if there's hatred directed back at him?

      What doesn't make it a surprise is the fact that Chavez opposes US's imperial stand on the word and went as far as nationalizing certain industries which were controlled by US corporations like the oil, mining and agricultural industry in Venezuela.

      But regardless of the software or other details, this is all still autarky and, even worse, central planning. Chavez is clearly ignorant of the fact that in the 20th century, central planning failed everywhere and produced 100 million corpses in the process.

      So it seems you believe that China has failed. Heck, claiming that central planning has failed is so astonishingly ignorant that it isn't even funny. Every country in the world implements central planning. It's called strategy and it's implemented in every aspect of government in every country in the world. Heck, the best cities in the world were designed by centralized urban planners, not to mention traffic systems, health care, social security, etc... Just because the US is a retarded, unorganized mess which bends over backwards to please their capitalist masters it doesn't mean that "central planning" failed. Heck, 3rd world countries offer better support for their citizens than the US. Look at Cuba, where there is no such thing as not treating any patient due to being poor. Just because the US is so retarded to the point of not organizing themselves with a bit of planning it doesn't mean it failed.

    11. Re:All the irrational replies explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny. Let's face it guys, the mix of capitalism/socialism/liberalism works, look at Europe and the East. South America is trying the same too. It's funny to see the adversity shown by many Americans towards big government, when so many governments do get things right. Lets face it: the reason you dislike big government and think that central planning doesn;t work is bacuse of the frakked up government in the US. Big spenders on military, foreign 'affairs' and all the wrong things, but everyone forgets things like healthcare and a generous social security system.

      It works in the rest of the world, open your eyes! Move the money from Defense and Homelang Security (what an abomination that is!) to medicare and generally into 'centrally planed' social improvement project. We Europeans reap the rewards: lower crimes, less murders, happier people, smarter people, much less people left behind, etc, etc. OK no strong military and sometimes very undirected government, but those are the very things that keep government in check and from running amok: bureaucracy.

    12. Re:All the irrational replies explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Central planning failed everywhere? Singapore? Nordic countries?

      Eh? Read up a few things. If you're calling Singapore a planned economy, that is rather daring, to say the least. And scandinavians would simply shake their heads about such an assertion. Don't mix up high levels of government expenditure as percent of GDP with the absence of market economy (background).

    13. Re:All the irrational replies explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No matter what Linux-friendly, appealing-sounding program he tries, the fact that he's determined to run the economy according to these ideas means it's doomed to crash and burn.

      Yes, you are correct. But in the meantime having the "Linux-friendly, appealing-sounding program" means that all the useful idiots will rally behind him just as they have always rallied behind others like him. By appealing to elitists who feel they are oppressed (by Micro$oft, the Man, or society) Chavez instantly gains evangelists and propagandists who will tirelessly sing his praises.
    14. Re:All the irrational replies explained by slysithesuperspy · · Score: 1

      Central planning will always fail. Those aren't centrally planed economies, they are just hampered economies.

    15. Re:All the irrational replies explained by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      Free market economies with high taxation and a uniform culture.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    16. Re:All the irrational replies explained by griffjon · · Score: 1

      And, uh, Korea -- which decided that, contrary to popular belief at the time, rice was not it's long-term "competitive advantage," and pushed the economy into manufacturing and high tech. Sure, it wasn't full-on command-and-control economy, but it still was centrally planned and executed.

      I think capitalism has produced its fair share of corpses as well.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    17. Re:All the irrational replies explained by coredog64 · · Score: 1

      At this point the Churchill quote would be apropos:

      Capitalism is the worst economic system, except for all the others.

    18. Re:All the irrational replies explained by PapayaSF · · Score: 1

      But consider how the USSR's central planning would have gone if it had Walmart's computing power, [...]

      Sorry, that would still be central planning. Walmart uses those tools in a free(ish) market, and so gets price signals from the competition and different suppliers, etc. It's the old economic calculation problem. If Stalin had those tools to use, or if Walmart were run as a government retail monopoly, they would still be doomed to fail.

      --
      Q: What does the "B." in Benoit B. Mandelbrot stand for? A: Benoit B. Mandelbrot
    19. Re:All the irrational replies explained by mjwx · · Score: 1

      At this point the Churchill quote would be apropos:

      Capitalism is the worst economic system, except for all the others.

      That's a Paraphrase. The actual quote is:

      I believe that democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others we have tried
      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    20. Re:All the irrational replies explained by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just admit it, you have no idea what constitutes a centrally planned economy do you?

      The past month I saw someone claiming Japan to be a perfect exaple of communism, that wouldn't be you would it?

    21. Re:All the irrational replies explained by Carpe+PM · · Score: 1

      The station supported the coup attempt. If Fox and Fox News supported an illegal attempt to overthrow the US government, they might get in trouble with the FCC.

      No. The Fox operations that broadcast are subject to FCC rules, which may or may not have rules against sedition, I don't know. Fox News is a cable channel, though they do provide radio news for broadcast.

      BTW, one show on broadcast TV here showed a picture of President Bush with the caption, 'SNIPERS WANTED', and nothing happened to anybody. Try something similar in Venezuela and you will at least get your license pulled.

  21. but not the first time you have lacked wisdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Cutting down all Brazil's rainforest to plant corn for ethanol is hardly a smart move. All in all, Brazil has shown itself to be a stupid greedy country that is selling out their future for pennies on the dollar. Often times it is wiser to use your replaceable resources to purchase energy vs. sell off what cannot be replaced at any cost.

  22. Inside the Coup by essence · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For more information on the context of whats going on in Venezula, check out the docco Chavez - Inside the Coup. It shows how the oil corporates attempting a coup manipulated the public. This is the people that lost their broadcast license not long ago.

    Chavez may seem like a bad man to some, but really is a result of the grass roots organising - aka The Bolivarian Circles.

  23. They claim USD$930 comparable? That's high. by gelfling · · Score: 1

    That seems high. I could probably get a machine from Tiger Direct for what Dictator for Life Hugo Chavez claims his Bolivarian machines cost. You could check the prices from Tiger or CDW or Dell or HP as do as well.

    1. Re:They claim USD$930 comparable? That's high. by Simon80 · · Score: 1

      Why don't you stop and think for a second about how you're going to get a machine from Tiger Direct into Venezuela? All of a sudden, it's not so cheap anymore.

    2. Re:They claim USD$930 comparable? That's high. by gelfling · · Score: 1

      Check out Dell's Venezuela website. Notebooks from $529, desktops from $229.

  24. Manufacturing computers isn't an IT activity by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The goal of the project is to jump-start a domestic IT industry and become an IT exporter to the rest of Latin America."

    So they're going to put free (as in beer as well as in "RMS-speak") on commodity hardware that they won't be able to manufacture any cheaper than US companies do. It doesn't sound like a big winner to me.

    1. Re:Manufacturing computers isn't an IT activity by ja · · Score: 3, Insightful

      hardware that they won't be able to manufacture any cheaper than US companies do. Please ... Companies in the USA do not produce any cheap computers, Chinese companies do!
      --

      send + more == money? ...
    2. Re:Manufacturing computers isn't an IT activity by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Of course, that's a given.

    3. Re:Manufacturing computers isn't an IT activity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't sound like a big winner to me.

      That's exactly what some americans said about outsourcing some tech jobs to places like India or building some crappy electronics equipment in places like Taiwan. Meanwhile those countries' know-how and production capability has increased and now they have a very prosper tech industry, so capable that independent companies started popping out and started producing their own products.

      Sure, assembling PCs doesn't require much technical know-how. Yet, Taiwan's very powerful tech industry, which is responsible for producing virtually all components that right now make your computer, started out as some plastics company shelving out cheap plastic toy trinkets that no one wanted.

      Oh and by the way, you blindly claimed that Venezuela will not manufacture those computers much cheaper than US companies but, as it is stated in the article, they are going to sell them by about 40% less than what US companies would sell them for. So Venezuela will offer cheap computers, including core 2 duo systems, to their people, will improve the country's overall tech capability and they will do it at a fraction of the cost. How does this not sound like a big winner?

    4. Re:Manufacturing computers isn't an IT activity by haraldm · · Score: 1

      True but then they control all of the manufacturing chain themselves, economically as well as morally.

      --
      open (SIG, "</dev/zero"); $sig = <SIG>; close SIG;
    5. Re:Manufacturing computers isn't an IT activity by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Companies in the USA do not produce any cheap computers, Chinese companies do!
      So not much chance of him stealing^H nationalising a chip fabrication plant then.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re:Manufacturing computers isn't an IT activity by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      This 40% cheaper claim doesn't make any sense. What costs are they cutting to make it possible? Given their current tiny volumes, they probably are paying more for parts than the major PC makers. Most likely the Venezuela government is kicking in money to make the price artificially low or they are significantly exaggerating the price difference.

    7. Re:Manufacturing computers isn't an IT activity by griffjon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They also have a goal to increasingly manufacture the components they are importing, domestically. Sounds to me like one of the unsung development models (often championed by Jane Jacobs) that has actually worked, where you involve FDI (Foreign Direct Investment), but produce locally, training your citizens in the tacit skills of manufacturing, and slowly taking over from the foreign firm, producing domestic competing firms, with a final goal of international markets. I dunno, but it worked pretty damned well for the East Asian Tigers.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
  25. An unbeatable combination for industry... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

    ...Oriental knowhow and cheap (South) American labour.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
  26. oops by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    Left off the word "software".

  27. Oh no by JoshJ · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cue the FUD comments about Linux and Communism now. :(

  28. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great idea. He could even add abortion rights, open borders, and gun control provisions to the GPL. That would secure his position as the Voice of Reason behind the FOSS movement.

  29. Venezula? by bestiarosa · · Score: 5, Funny

    Venezuela is in South America but where is Venezula?

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re:Venezula? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      East of Columba and south of Venezuela.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:Venezula? by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 2, Funny

      but where is Venezula?

      Venus.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

  30. Then they're lucky by HangingChad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it will be till somebody pokes around the prepackage and finds it able to only load approved state software, calls home, etc.

    Then they'll be lucky to be running Linux. They can download a clean install from almost anywhere, blank the state software and start over. Download free tools to monitor their network traffic and watch to see if the hardware or BIOS has been borked.

    But their plan was foiled by loading OSS on that machine, otherwise they would have gotten away with it. A fortunate oversight, don't you agree?

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:Then they're lucky by Jaidan · · Score: 1

      Exactly, without learning with the Microsoft crutch these new users will quickly become oriented to the tools available to linux and as such will have no fear of wiping and staring over clean

      I think I know what the next ./ article will be...Chavez orders all major linux dristro sites blocked =)

  31. Volksempfänger by tenchiken · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I love the Chavez apologists. At the risk of invoking a law that no doubt everyone on Slashdot is familiar with, I wonder if this will end up being the TCP/IP equivalent of Volksempfänger complete with filters to keep comments from more then 100-150 miles away.

    It's amazing what people are willing to forget because someone is a enemy of their enemy. Chavez is rapidly militarizing, is the only leader in the entire world who seems not to have gotten the Communism is dead memo, and is now ruling by fiat.

    Not good things.

    1. Re:Volksempfänger by Temporal · · Score: 1

      My favorite Chavez-ism: He set price controls on various food items in order to stop inflation and "protect the poor". Naturally, as any economist could predict, this had no impact on inflation but did create food shortages. How did Chavez respond? He accused people of "hoarding" food and sent his police off to seize whatever food supplies they could find. source

      If Venezuela weren't swimming in oil, its economy would already be in ruins. Unfortunately the oil money is just buying Chavez time to build up to an even more spectacular collapse.

    2. Re:Volksempfänger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't understand all that intellectual commie stuff but I have one and it gets like 40MPG and is pretty reliable.

    3. Re:Volksempfänger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, Chaves compares to Hitler very well.

      Features of Chaves' government (Source: Yes! Magazine http://www.yesmagazine.com/article.asp?id=1743)

      -Participation
      75% of registered voters participated in the December 2006 election. More than 15,000 Communal Councils formed in 2006 that give neighborhoods power to make local decisions. Massive community participation in government social missions.
      -Free and Fair Elections
      Eleven internationally observed national elections in last eight years. Government promotes voter registration. Independent National Electoral Council oversees elections. Standardized voting machines nationwide produce paper trail. Opposition claims of fraud exhaustively investigated. Constitution provides for recall of any elected official.
      -Freedom of Press
      Hundreds of new independent community media outlets. 2005 reform increased state control of airwaves. Media highly polarized. Private media strongly critical of Chávez, supported coup in 2002 and oil lockout in 2002-2003. Public media strongly supportive. Non-renewal of RCTV license widely criticized; decision is constitutional.
      -Varied Political Parties
      77 parties participated in December 2006 election. Chávez wants to consolidate support in one "United Socialist Party," says parties that don't join "can leave."
      Freedom of Assembly, Expression, Speech
      No extralegal retaliation by Chávez after 2002 coup. Political repression much decreased. Freedom to demonstrate highly respected. PROVEA, Venezuelan NGO, reports 4.5% of 1300 demonstrations in 2006 were "repressed, blocked, or obstructed," a 70% decrease from 1997-98.
      -Private Property
      Constitutional requirement of payment for nationalization honored. Opposition fears of unpaid expropriation not borne out. 2001 Land Law calls for unused state land and large, unproductive latifundio holdings to be redistributed to campesinos. Government promises to compensate at market rate for land.
      -Equality
      Constitution covers gender, rights for the poor, campesinos, and indigenous, but omits race. Tremendous improvements for poor. Society still machista, individualist, and discriminatory. Treatment of non-Chávez supporters questionable: some government institutions do not employ people who supported 2004 Recall Referendum.
      -Checks and Balances
      Five independent, autonomous branches of government. Grant of temporary "rule by decree" power criticized by opposition and U.S., but is constitutional; used by at least three other presidents. Chávez criticized for reform of Supreme Court; critics claim court stacking.
      -Transparency
      Chávez fairly transparent, but many government officials are not. Little progress curing government and police corruption inherited from past. One of highest crime rates in the world; no improvement under Chávez. Prison conditions still abusive.
      -Constitution
      1999 Constitution written with massive popular participation; passed with 72% support in referendum. Protects human rights and democracy; promotes social justice. Chávez has explicitly followed the Constitution. Constitutional Reform can start in National Assembly or at request of 15% of registered voters.
      -Economic Human Rights
      Poverty and unemployment down, minimum wage and social spending up. Venezuela declared itself free of illiteracy in October 2005. Free universal education, including university. Free universal health care and drug rehabilitation. More than 180,000 cooperatives registered since 1998.
      -Community and Workplace Democracy
      Chávez requires communities to organize to receive government aid. Co-ops, community councils, and co-managed factories promoted with state incentives. Government encourages endogenous development based on democracy and collective production. Ya, Venezuela is such a Nazi Germany
    4. Re:Volksempfänger by NeMon'ess · · Score: 1

      If Venezuela weren't swimming in oil, its economy would already be in ruins. Unfortunately the oil money is just buying Chavez time to build up to an even more spectacular collapse.

      Without Chavez, under capitalism, Venezuela's oil profits would go mostly to the wealthy corporations and shareholders. Then a little bit of that wealth would trickle down to the other 99% of the people. Hopefully Chavez, for all his faults, will give more of those gigantic profits directly to projects that help the 99% more quickly and directly, and from there the money trickles up again to businesses and the owners. Want to stimulate an economy? Give money to the people. Want to stimulate the economy less but also make the rich richer? Give tax breaks to the rich.

    5. Re:Volksempfänger by ghyd · · Score: 1

      "Chavez is rapidly militarizing" Let's hope he won't support dictators, use it's secret service to help future terrorist hubs, invade and utterly destroy countries with no regard whatsoever for their populations, when there is any left after the rampage, have secret prisons, legitimate torture. That kind of stuff.

    6. Re:Volksempfänger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Venezuela is the big Soviet Cuba, they live better without oil shopping!

      They live better with weaponry!

      They have more contacts with Soviet Russia, Soviet China, Soviet Taiwan, Soviet Japan, Soviet India, etc in the military business.

      They have 0 contacts with US.

  32. Brazil by mdsolar · · Score: 3, Informative

    I went to a conference last month that I report on here: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/05/juicing.html. Brazil is also going big into biodiesel using castor seed. The worry about rainforests right now seems to be palm oil while cane will likely expand into existing grazing land (possibly former forest but cut for beef if it is).
    --
    Solar power with no installation cost: http://mdsolar.blogspot.com/2007/01/slashdot-users -selling-solar.html

  33. Hitler had his Volkswagon by davidwr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Politics aside, this shows great promise.

    It's far too early to tell how long the Chavez regime will last, but I hope the next government keeps the program alive.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Hitler had his Volkswagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your sig is nice, but the journal entry doesn't allow replying anymore.

  34. Hmmm...this partnership has happened before by Smeagel · · Score: 1, Interesting

    And it lead to thousands of sick and dying people, when they tried to team up to make medicine. Let's hope they actually attempt "quality control" this time, something communism has always been awful at.

    1. Re:Hmmm...this partnership has happened before by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      What are you trying to say here?

      That National Health care is always a failure? Most of Europe is laughing at that idea.

      That Venezuela is a communist? Nope, a democracy whose current democratically elected leader is Socialist. If he doesn't deliver, the people could vote him out.

      PS: the quotes around "quality control" in your post are grammatically incorrect. See http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/marks/quota tion.htm

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    2. Re:Hmmm...this partnership has happened before by Smeagel · · Score: 1
      Do some research on a chemical called diethylene glycol, and how it's poisoned several countries in south America as they tried to make their own medicine, opting not to pay for American medicine where we have this thing called "Quality Control". And grammar-master, I use quotes because I'm too lazy to type the html flag for italics, but thanks for the English lesson, another pompous brit (and yes, starting a sentence with a conjunction was put there to annoy you).

      Lastly, your comment on how it's a democracy who elected a socialist leader...lol!! Did you know Stalin was elected too? By a landslide! At least according to the results he issued. He also ran a socialist country with elected officials... How naive, this guy is clearly setting himself up to be a socialist dictator, and Europe loves him because he gives a lot of shit to the US. And by the way, I'll take my healthcare system over the brits any day. I live in and work in NYC, which leads me to work and be friends with several former Londoners, and they all agree as well. Sure the service isn't as good for everyone, but if you have health insurance, it is significantly better than anything socialized medicine offers. And in the long run, cheaper too.

    3. Re:Hmmm...this partnership has happened before by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      I use quotes because I'm too lazy to type the html flag for italics

      Wtach and learn. It's 3-4 characters. Is your thinking that lazy too?

      How naive, this guy is clearly setting himself up to be a socialist dictator

      Well, I'd condemn that if and when it happens, but I'm not believing that propaganda. I'm sure he's not perfect; from what I've seen he has quite an ego and some of his friends are quite dodgy.

      I'll take my healthcare system over the brits any day, if you have health insurance

      That's "if" is a caveat large enough to drive a truck through. If you're a really rich Venezuelan, you're going to hate Chavez and all that he does. But you'd be in the small minority there, as you are in the US.

      if you have health insurance, it is significantly better than anything socialized medicine offers

      Yes, and you know what? I have private healthcare here in the UK. The two are not mutually exclusive. A safety net is only civilised. Everyone believes that the NHS could be better. How to run it is a political issue, and always will be. But everyone (i.e. every political party that has a hope realistic of being elected) understands that NHS is an important, necessary institution.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    4. Re:Hmmm...this partnership has happened before by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      Do some research on a chemical called diethylene glycol

      Ok, so I've been to wikipedia on it. Austrian Antifreeze, basically. Funny that the whole "poisoned several countries in south America" thing isn't big news on there. The whole "this here anecode proves that South American governments are to to be trusted evar" line of reasoning seems rather ... lazy .. to me. You're saying that there are no anecdotes on how free market companies in the US have never failed people?

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    5. Re:Hmmm...this partnership has happened before by Smeagel · · Score: 1

      OK, so basically you can't do research, and that makes it not an important issue? And your idea of research is to look it up on wikipedia? And then you go on to call my reasoning lazy because you don't know what the hell you're talking about? LOL

      Where did I say anything about free market, it's the government regulations COMBINED with free market that make the systems of the industrialized world work. The problem is when the government is the only people doing something, and nobody is looking over their shoulder (like the gov't and stock holders do to industrialized countries), then the odds of an awful product are significantly higher. This isn't just rampant speculation, talk to some people who lived in communist Russia and ask them what they thought of the quality of government produced goods -- in fact amongst Russians there are lots and lots of jokes about how everything the government produced fell apart.

      It's obvious that you are sold on the fact that the new dictator of Venezuela is a great guy, but don't present it as an educated viewpoint when it CLEARLY isn't. You declare everything that comes out against him as propaganda. I realize you don't understand how free speech works, but in the US the vast majority of our press has a liberal bias (there I typed an extra 5 characters for you, god you whine), and they also do not agree with the current conservative government the vast majority of the time. In fact here in very liberal NYC, on the campus of very liberal Columbia University, he got booed off of his podium because he started telling lies that even the bush-hating liberals found absolutely absurd. But yet, despite the fact that he's an "enemy of an enemy" for the liberal media and the liberal academics, they still wouldn't buy the crap he was selling, because he is clearly grabbing power.

      But you can keep lying to yourself, and saying he's just doing good things by suppressing basic rights, stealing land, and enforcing his will militarily upon his people - because he stood up to America, and that's when you decided you like him.

    6. Re:Hmmm...this partnership has happened before by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1

      OK, so basically you can't do research,

      No, just that you're not important enough for me to do any.

      And your idea of research is to look it up on wikipedia?

      My one link is a step up from your no links and vague accusations.

      talk to some people who lived in communist Russia

      Soviet Russia is a total straw man in this context.

      the new dictator of Venezuela

      You keep saying that. No evidence given.

      because he stood up to America, and that's when you decided you like him.

      Standing up to the bully is always good, but my intention was not to whitewash Chavez. What I like him for is the "anti-poverty initiatives, the construction of thousands of free medical clinics for the poor, the institution of educational campaigns" etc. You know, doing things for the people. You can criticise the effectiveness of those if you want.

      You seem to confuse Communist dictatorship with an elected socialist. They are not the same at all. The elected person has much more incentive to please the electorate than the dictator. The US is very worried that such a socialist experiment might succeed in substantially reducing poverty in Latin America. They need it fail visibly, never mind the human cost.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

    7. Re:Hmmm...this partnership has happened before by Smeagel · · Score: 1

      Now I'll try to speak slowly since it's clear you have very little political education:

      What do you call a man at the top of a government who has no immediate challenge to his power, decides exactly what must be done and it gets done, and has full control of the military? Correct Answer: a dictator.

      You're not even challenging that, your entire point is that he was democratically elected (and then with EXTREME naivety you're assuming it wasn't rigged, you need to do some research on how often elections of dictators are rigged).

      You act like Dictators are made less dangerous if they're elected by the people, so I'll return to my previous point, Stalin was "elected", the "h-man" whose name I shall not mention was elected, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was elected. Just because a dictator is "elected" doesn't mean they're not a dictator. And before you go off on a rant about how he's elected and he can lose his power, do a search of all the "elected" military dictators and see how many have given up their power. Seriously, I can't say it enough, you're naive. You need to learn your history before you start spouting on about his great social programs. The best part is that you assume the great social programs supposedly coming out of a country WITHOUT free press, with a DICTATOR, aren't propaganda, but then you assume the criticisms of his reign of terror coming from a country WITH free press, with a DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC, are propaganda. It's really quite funny.

    8. Re:Hmmm...this partnership has happened before by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you call a man at the top of a government who has no immediate challenge to his power, decides exactly what must be done and it gets done, and has full control of the military? Correct Answer: a dictator.

      Eh, by that definition a US president one year into his 4-year term is a dictator. It's a meaningless definition.

      you're assuming it wasn't rigged,

      You're assuming it was.

      you need to do some research on how often elections of dictators are rigged

      The elections must have been rigged because he's a dictaaaator, and we know he's a dictator because the election must have been rigged. Circular logic. I've seen some sources today that claimed the opposite with regards rigging.

      The "third term" situation bears watching, but you are going off prematurely here.

      coming out of a country WITHOUT free press,
      the way I heard it, the Venezuelan press has spent a great deal of time and effort using their freedom to oppose the government. One coup-cheerleading TV station didn't get their contract renewed a few years later by the government that they tried to coup against. really, boo hoo.

    9. Re:Hmmm...this partnership has happened before by Smeagel · · Score: 1

      Wow, you really know nothing.

      You obviously can't read, I said a person who decides exactly what must be done and it gets done, that is NOT the US president by any stretch. Bush can't get anything done. The legislature gets things done, not the president. I could really stop here, since it's obvious you know nothing, but I'll go on.

      I'm saying he's a dictator because he has absolute power and control over the military and the press, there is no circular reasoning whatsoever, but again, logic and facts are obviously not your specialty.

  35. I have to giggle by fat_mike · · Score: 0, Troll

    That's great! Now he can keep an eye on everybody. I see him as the boss in V for Vendetta, telling his computer how much he loves her.

    20 years from now people will be going "Chavez who?" Is that the guy that thought he could be Hitler and Stalin rolled into one. Good thing the people of Venezuela smacked him down.

  36. Well, yes, actually. by twitter · · Score: 0, Troll

    would the fanboys like you also praise satan for adopting FOSS/linux to control the fuel delivery and batch-processing of the new arrivals?

    Why not? Don't you M$ fanboys preach respect for Mr. Gate's business methods? Just think of this as "cutting off the oxygen" and admire the removal of the M$ tax from one of the richest countries in Latin America.

    The rest of us will praise self help and reason where we see it. Is there any good reason people around the world should pay Dell to assemble parts made in China? Free software also has ports to more appropriate hardware, cheap and low power consumption, instead of the eight core monsters M$ is moving towards.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Well, yes, actually. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Friends help friends install graybeard software.

  37. us exports 2 remain high? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you will need a time machine to go back to 1945

  38. Fair Game. by twitter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So I am torn on this topic. I love Linux and free open source software and I want M$ to die a fast death, yet I want U.S. exports to remain high.

    Eventually, you can only make money by providing a real service. The chips are still Intel, so where there is US excellence, there is US income. There might be more if it were not for M$ proping up Intel at the expense of other US companies like AMD and IBM. Remember DEC and DR? They had some nice export income too. The US might be more competitive at electronics assembly if we could convince the world not to use Chinese slave labor, but we can't so that market has gone.

    Money made based on the Windoze monopolies is a pipe dream. M$ really thought they could corner the word's market for something as ethereal as software? Give me a break. The only thing that's interesting about the M$ story is that they pulled off their little scam for so long. It's over because others can and will do better.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Fair Game. by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      The US might be more competitive at electronics assembly if we could convince the world not to use Chinese slave labor, but we can't so that market has gone.

      Might also have something to do with $12++ million dollar salaries for CEO. My bet is a Chinese CEO makes less than the cleaning staff at your US office and actually works for the company full time. The $12M US salary could hire 120 R&D people in the US. But the problem with the US is you have 10 chiefs managing 1 worker, I suspect the Chinese plant has one chief for 10 workers. Mix this taxes, cost of living...volume manufacturing is going to China to stay, including electronics and soon automobiles.

    2. Re:Fair Game. by dedazo · · Score: 1

      "Windoze" runs fine on AMD. Next?

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  39. They didn't even register the domain name? by d9000 · · Score: 0

    It may change quickly, but so far http://www.bolivariancomputers.com/ is not even registered.

    1. Re:They didn't even register the domain name? by canuck57 · · Score: 1

      It may change quickly, but so far http://www.bolivariancomputers.com/ is not even registered.

      It is now, likely by some US based cyber-squatter via GO DADDY, which is a prime example of what is wrong with the domain name system. But that is a different topic. But it adds fuel to the fire on US based companies like GO Daddy and Verisign for accepting its obviously fraudulent registration.

  40. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by bluSCALE4 · · Score: 1

    That's funny. We had to beg China to trade with us. Europe could careless about our economy. Why would they risk their bottom line for us?

  41. Corea? by MsGeek · · Score: 1, Funny

    Hmmm...is North Corea somehow related to Chick Corea? And is L. Ron Hubbard worshipped as a deity there? Is their prime export clams? Wait, you meant North Korea! With that little pipsqueak with the Elvis pompadour and platform shoes! And no lights on at night! Ah, now I understand. K thx bai...

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Corea? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did it occur to you that "Korea" might be written differently in other languages? Like for example Spanish? Look at the guy's name "fsmunoz" which looks to me like F S Muñoz, a Spanish surname. I don't think it's writtern with a "k" in Korea, anyway.

    2. Re:Corea? by fritsd · · Score: 1

      probably something like Choson Minjujuui Inmin Konghwaguk, south korea = Daehan Min-guk (note: I can't speak hangugeo and can't read hangul (although it looks interesting to learn)).

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    3. Re:Corea? by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      Well, it was a simple mistake, quite simple becaust that's how it's written in my native language. I'm glad it inspired you that much though :)

  42. Re:Maybe I'll Buy one, But customer server might s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Me: I have a problem with my chavez-400 laptop, the screen went all red CSR: We'll offer to take repossession of the computer at no cost to you Me: No, I need it to go to me independent news websites CSR: Ok Me: (sounds of gunshots) *Phone hung Up*



    Get back to Venezuela, things are going a bit downhill in the USA.

  43. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by dangitman · · Score: 1

    "Is this mic on?"

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  44. OT: current Slashdot fortune "Honi soit..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now the Slashdot "fortune" message at the bottom of the page is "Honi soit la vache qui rit."

    This is a mashup of two things:

    The famous slogan of the "Order of the Garter" is "Honi soit qui mal y pense", which is French for "shame on he who thinks bad of it."

    The label of Laughing Cow brand cheese has a picture of a laughing cow, and the phrase "La vache qui rit", French for "the cow who laughs".

    So the mashup more or less means "Shame on the laughing cow" but it's really funny just as a strange juxtaposition of two things that are only related by being in French. This probably isn't very funny to French speakers, more like WTF.

    So now you know. And knowing is half the battle. (The other half is bloody violence.)

  45. Re:As much as I love Chavez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The Venezuelix and HugoChavix distros can contain his own cryptographic software.


    Those are not issues against the illegal thinks of laws of USofA as violations of cryptographic exportation of USofA, violations of patents inside of USofA, violations of copyrightes inside of USofA, RIAA & MPAA of USofA.

    Venezuela is not USofA.

    Venezuela is not obligated to follow the strict agreements of USofA.

    Venezuela is like a big country of international waters/overseas.

    The venezolans can sell Java for venezolans.

    The venezolans can erase stupid comments of allegations of Java and of US licenseers.

    The venezolans can encrypt messages for warfare to East Middle and to Asia with RSA 65536 bits which is considered illegal inside of USofA and legal outside.

    Yo he visto a un venezolano haciendo hacking contra una empresita compañerita de Micro$oft desde su casa, todo gracias a Linux de Hugo Chávez.

  46. Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by mad+zambian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am not surprised at the quantity of anti-Chavez invective from the republi-trolls that seem to infest slashdot now. Regurgitating US propaganda as fact.

    One or two points.

    Venezuela is a Democracy. They have elections every so often so the people get to decide who gets to run the place. They have decided that they prefer Chavez to the alternatives.

    Chavez was democratically elected. And re-elected. Something like 60% of the populace want him as leader rather than the traditional oligarchies that used to run the place for their own benefit. They of course hate him for this. Almost all of the media in Venezeula are owned by the wealthy elite.

    Chavez is not a communist. He is a socialist. There is a huge difference.
    His socialist view is that *all* of the people of Venezuela should have affordable healthcare, at very low cost, if not free.
    His socialist view is that *all* of the people should have low cost /free education.
    Ditto with affordable decent housing for all.

    And he is well on the way to achieving these aims.

    His policies are meant to benefit the whole country, and not just the wealthy elite oligarchies.
    So yes, Washington hates this, and him as a result.
    Washington is having conniptions with this because I suspect they are frightened that the rest of the world might look at this socialist, benefit the maximum number of the population thing, and think "Hey, maybe there is something in this." Affordable healthcare for all? Affordable Education for all? Affordable Housing for all? Why haven't we got this?
    This is why they have tried to back a coup to remove him from power, Against the democratically expressed wishes of majority of the country.

    So, for trying to raise the standard of living of the population, he is automatically reviled and vilified. All this crap about spyware installed by the government on Linux, anti-Bush screensavers and the like is ignorant spite.

    And one commenter compared him to Satan?
    More than one "hate his guts".
    I would be interested to know why exactly.

    For those with an enquiring mind, there is a good book called "Pirates of the Caribbean: Axis of Hope" by Tariq Ali. It is about Chavez in Venezuela, Castro in Cuba and Morales in Bolivia. ISBN 978-1-84467-102-1. Published by Verso 2006. Read it and you may learn something.

    Sigh. Bye bye karma.

    --
    Trying to associate Microsoft with "fun" is like trying to associate Satan with aromatherapy. -Tycho
  47. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by smchris · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the Western Hemisphere belongs to the U.S.! Or something.

    Whether you love Chavez or hate him, whether you think our actions in the hemisphere over the last century have been prudent or monstrous, one thing is clear: while Bush is (incompetently) chasing the middle eastern oil, he's letting our control of Central and South America slip away. So, how many of you Neocons still think Dubya is a bold imperial genius?

  48. Re: Dragon Linux, brrraaaaauuummmmm .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hugo Chávez Government pay a lot of money to the Chinese Government because of their cheap and good computers.

    Hugo Chávez Government pay 0 US$ to U.S.A. government. Why pay to it for nothing? The answer is zero dollars.

    Bill Gates hates him.
    George Bush hates him.

    Hugo Chávez loves to God.

  49. Good but not enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I believe this is only a political action an not a good thing, because in Venezuela the government said "Use free software"... but when you try really to use it, they put a lot of obstacles, by example I know that Venezuelan universities are forced to buy this machines even if they prices are higher than other ones, this is good for a country? o worst ever, I see that they are deleting linux on this machines and installing pirate version of Windows.

    I know this is a good thing, but Venezuela must to do more than just saying everywhere that they support free software, and not doing really efective actions to promote free software, because if you travel to this country you will see a lot of lies that are telling the government about his archiviements and you can contrast reallity with the fantasy in the mind of Venezuelan politicians.

  50. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "His socialist view is that *all* of the people of Venezuela should have affordable healthcare, at very low cost, if not free."

    His socialist view is that AFTER THE PEOPLE GIVE MOST IF NOT ALL OF THEIR MONEY TO THE GOVERNMENT *all* of the people of Venezuela should have affordable healthcare, at very low cost, if not free.

    There ya go, fixed it for you, no need to thank me my socialist view is that I should have done it for free

  51. can u say subsidy? by uimedic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Large hardware makers have consolidated like crazy, been spun off/sold, and/or gone out of business because the margins in computer hardware manufacturing are notoriously thin. Now Venezuela comes in offering computers for 75% (not 60% as Chavez innumerately claims) of the cost of the big manufacturers. What gives?

    Frankly, they're not really "cheaper" so much as they're just subsidised. If I lived in Venezuela, I'd rather have press freedom, foreign investment, affordable food (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti cle/2007/02/08/AR2007020801240.html), and more expensive computers than propoganda, state-owned industry, price controls, and cheap computers.

    I'm all in favor of FOSS and cheap hardware, but anyone who can't see through this guy's cynical bullshit is blind, stupid, or willfully ignorant.

    --
    Diagnosis: you are paranoid. As luck would have it, you're also being followed.
  52. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by homer_s · · Score: 1

    Chavez is not a communist. He is a socialist. There is a huge difference.

    The difference is a difference in degree - not a difference in quality.
    Both systems need to use force to take from productive people and give to people who are not productive. They also need to restrict what people can produce so that they do not compete with the inefficient state provided service.

    We also have democratically elected communist regimes in India in 2 states - both of those states (Kerala and WB) are economic basket cases which depend on other productive states for aid.

    Just like Russia, NK, Cuba & Zimbabwe, Venezuela will end in tragedy.

  53. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

    I think Jimmy Carter (the George Bush of the 70s) rescinded it when he gave the panama canal to the ChiComs.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  54. More Chavez Lies by MBraynard · · Score: 1
    He is lying about the pricing of the PCs. You can get the same machines for the same or better prices for Dell.

    Further, guess what happens if you are trying to start the Venezuelan equivilant of Dell in your garage and you start cutting in on the government's new monopoly.

    Most morons here are not going to recognize this but their failure to recognize the disaster of this policy does not change that the policy is a disaster that will be realized.

    It's like Chavez and Lula are in a race to be the South American Hitl.... (GODWIN TRIGGERED! DEBATE OVER!)

  55. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I only said you three things:

    -I live in Venezuela and I believe that it's a democracy, but where the state do a great abuse of his power over the people that don't think like they think, by example if you don't register in the PSUV ( Partido Socialista Unido de Venezuela) Socialist United Association of Venezuela (the goverment associantion) they don't give you a job in their industries (about 60% of industries in Venezuela are controlled by the government).

    -The other one if you like so much Venezuela, I recommend you to leave your Country an go to live there (resign your nationality), to see if you like, because it's to easy to talk about something when you watch by TV (or have contracts with Venezuela Government), but you must live the experience, and later only later (about 1 o 2 years) said what you think in this forum.

    -This is the last one, I can see in your post that you mix reallity with fantasy about Venezuela Reallity... I said you free now another archiviement of the Venezuela Government, the jobs are not given to the best professionals, the only requierement to give you a good job in the government's industry is not to approve "Free of Speech", and only think like they think, and shut up your mouth about your owns ideas.

  56. Linux and dictatorship go together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone notice that it's always left-wing governments and/or left-wing dictatorships that embrace Linux? (For example, the state in India that's forcing Linux down its citizenry is run by a Communist government; Chavez is a left-wing thug; China, embracing Red Flag Linux, is communist, etc.)

    Linux only thrives through government fiat. When people are given a choice, they reject linux wholesale.

    1. Re:Linux and dictatorship go together by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      So I guess the existence of SELinux confirms my suspicions - the USA has been infiltrated by Communists!

  57. Is OP a Venezuelan gman? by psyburn · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why does replies like this read like Ministry of Truth propaganda.
    I see it here on Slashdot, BBC, Digg, and Engadget.
    You know, government officials posing as common people, giving speeches to the uneducated masses around them. Also the offense they take at everything smells of lost-in-translation jokes taken as "My duty is to correct these brainwashed masses (even though my post is copy-paste approved script)"
    Post like the above make little sense when they are posted so early and seem to lack a natural flow across the entire post.

    Second: I have never heard bad things from Washington or Big Media over Venezuela.
    My distaste for Chavez comes from watching him blather to hear himself talk.
    He just wants to feel important in his own little world.
    If he get something done, great ('cause it's just a bonus)
    Oh and maybe a handful of friend who grew up there, not even wealthy, just lucky enough to be born elsewhere and have somewhere to leave to as Chavez grip closes.
    He can't even keep religion as it threatens his cause.

    (flamebait)
    Makes me wonder if there is a "Ministry of Truth" or some-such in Venezuela that men with texts of approved translated comments copy and paste and edit(as well as a only-studied-english-in-school translators can/do and that is why the comments read funny to me, professional translations spliced poor.)
    (sarcasm)
    To the parent: Do you know of the difference between Socialist and Communist by definition in English? Or does your script not tell you that, since your job is to make sure that Venezuelan people who are looking else where for news and opinions must be convinced with your chosen copypasta(let your translators catch that meme) that the world loves Hugo Chavez as much as he needs his Venezuelan people to love him and only him while he plays the world stage garnering favor by Bush-bashing, an over-used, tasteless tactic.
    Side Note: WHO THE HELL MODDED OP Insightful?
    (/sarcasm)(/flamebait)

    And No Cowardice for this, No I will not be an AC

    On a side note the image is "prejudge"

    --
    This was brought to you buy the Department of Redundancy Department
    1. Re:Is OP a Venezuelan gman? by bluSCALE4 · · Score: 1

      Closes his grip? The person with a strangle hold is George Bush with his policies. You can't travel around North America without a passport anymore. *New flash to those that never knew you could* And all your state ID's are about to go down the drain because a new National ID is set to ship in 2008. You won't be able to get anything you'd normally be able to get without it. And they all have RF chips in them. I like how you used closes instead of closed since in Venezuela there's still hope, but here in the US, it's in past tense. Bush closed his grip on all of us, including those in Iraq who are going to be there for the next 10 years protecting corporate interests.

  58. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You seem to miss the point. How about Canada? Sweden? Tragedy? Huh?

  59. PLEASE MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brilliant points !!!

  60. I don't boliv it. by zig007 · · Score: 1

    How can they possibly cut 40%? It's unbolivable!

    --
    Baboons are cute.
  61. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by bjourne · · Score: 1

    And one commenter compared him to Satan? More than one "hate his guts". I would be interested to know why exactly.

    He once said that it was right for a starving man to steal bread. That is all it takes to be hated by the "civilized" world.

  62. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    China is not an enemy of the united states. even chimpy understands that one

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  63. Their New Deal by professorfalcon · · Score: 1

    A penguin in every pot.

  64. Excellent by Bombula · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Superb post. I was going to write a reply, but I see you've already covered just about everything I was going to mention. The only thing I would add is that it is important to recognize the agenda behind the vilification of any system that is not strictly plutocratic market capitalism:

    Socialism CANNOT be allowed to be a successful sociopolitical system because it would represent a threat to the profit-making machinery of plutocratic market capitalism. The uber-wealthy folks LIKE being able to game the system for profit. While America's economy is growing and corproate profits are at record highs, the middle class is evaporating and life for the poor is fast heading into the toilet - crappy healthcare, crappy education, and on and on.

    Now if someone ever actually manages to prove that there's a better way to do things, well, it could all turn very ugly for guys like Dubya. They can't vilify countries full of successful white people - like Sweden, Norway, Denmark, etc - where socialism really works. But a country full of poor brown people is an easy target for their brand of rhetoric.

    --
    A-Bomb
    1. Re:Excellent by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

      I thought socialism worked in the Nordic countries because of the socio-economic equality they've always had? Where as, say, South America got the ass-end of Spain and Portugal's aristocratic exports, and are still suffering through the two-class system today.

      --

      There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

  65. Linux and Windows by kylehase · · Score: 1

    "...the computers will use the open-source Linux, but the components are also compatible with the Windows operating system." Hardware that runs Linux yet is compatible with the Windows operating system? Now that's newsworthy!
    --
    You want fun, go home and buy a monkey!
  66. Re:Two words: Term Limits by OGmofo · · Score: 1

    Any executive in power that does not honor the concept of term limits is a dictator, plain and simple.

    I don't care if he shits flowers, cures the blinds and raises the dead. If he alters the constitution to eliminate term limits and plans to remain in power indefinitely, or even a very long time, he's a despot and a dictator.

    Term limits are a crucial lynchpin concept of democracy. Without them, a leader need never fear answering for their actions.

    Ergo, Chavez is a dictator.

  67. Don't underestimate the naivete of tech people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here and here you can see comments from Slashdotters in June 2002 supporting Robert Mugabe's forcible redistribution of land from white Zimbabwean farmers to his political supporters and cronies.

    Why did the Slashdotters support dictator Mugabe's actions? From their comments, it seems that they dis-believed the coverage of the issue in the international press and instead bought into Mugabe's propaganda: that the press was biased against him, that he was motivated only to correct a historical injustice and that the land would go to poor people who would know how to farm it efficiently.

    In fact, the most critical stories were true: the land was seized from some of the best farmers in the country, and given only to Mugabe's wealthy supporters who did not even know how to farm, and a disastrous famine was the predictable result.

    These Slashdot comments stuck in my mind because, as I was reading them, I was dismayed that anyone would fall for the propaganda of a corrupt and oppressive dictator. But in truth, the kind of technical know-how which is common at Slashdot doesn't give any kind of economic or geopolitical insight.

    That is why many people here are supporters of Chavez. They serve the role of Lenin's "useful idiots".

  68. That's not socialism by Iloinen+Lohikrme · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems that in Slashdot many people have some what strange idea on what socialism is and where they think that they are seeing it.

    In socialism the people via government own and control the means of production. Communism is not alternative to socialism, but a way to enter socialism via armed struggle. Social democracy is an alternative way to achieve socialism by transforming the state peacefully into socialism step by step. In the world where we are living, there is no country that is practising socialism.

    You said that countries like Sweden, Norway and Denmark are socialist, that's dead wrong. The countries you cited are free capitalistic market economies. The only difference in Nordic and usually in European countries is that they have set up safety nets for their citizen: i.e. well-fare, public education and health-care etc.. Having these things doesn't make a country socialist, it makes it a well-fare state.

    When we look at south America and especially what Chavez is doing to Venezuela, they are more or less committed on idea of national socialism: using the economy of a country and it's means of production to further national agendas and it's manifested destination. That is wrong and stupid. They are only going to wreck their economies and after they have used their national resources like oil and gas, their economies will crumble down. The only way to achieve prosperity is to invest in infrastructure, means of production and to abilities of citizens. Nordic countries nor Europe weren't build in a decade, the prosperity that we have and that takes care of welfare state is the product of hundreds of years work and investment into infrastructure and means of production.

    1. Re:That's not socialism by gnud · · Score: 1

      Nordic countries nor Europe weren't build in a decade,
      Actually, Norway is wealthy only because of natural resources, mainly oil and waterfalls (power plants). Our infrastructure is partly buildt by nazi germany during ww2(really, a startling amount of railroads and roads, some powerplants etc) or after ww2, funded by the US. So Norway was buildt in about 60-70 years, mostly in the first 35 or so.
    2. Re:That's not socialism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Communism does not mean "a way to enter socialism via armed struggle". Where do you get this crazy notion? Because many armed struggle leftist have preferred to call themselves communists to create a more hardcore image?

      In Marxist theory, Communism refers to a final STATELESS, classless society. Socialism is the transition era charactarised by State ownership of the means of production. The Socialist State is supposed to "wither away" and communism ensue.
      Anarchists (Libertarian Communists, or Libertarian Socialists) reject such a clearly defined Socialist transition government. They mostly use Socialism and Communism interchangeably.

      For neither of the main currents of revolutionary leftism does communism imply armed struggle vs. socialism implying parlimentarianism.

      The distinction you are trying to refer to is a split among Social Democrats circa 1910s into two camps, (the new) Social Democrats (parliamentarianists, Europe) and Bolsheviks (armed struggle, Russia).

    3. Re:That's not socialism by eMbry00s · · Score: 1

      Sweden here.

      It should also be noted that we are more than a wellfare state. Those of us who know anything about national economics agree that we do not have a free market and that we do not have a socialist system.

      We call our system a mixed economy, and it consists of a market and a set of laws to control that market. This is what the US system is aswell, but ours has a much larger set of laws. Yes, our market is free by default and then has a blacklist of things that aren't allowed, just like the US. However, we think that the market is a tool, not a universal way of life that produces liquid happiness. We have very few qualms about imposing rules to make this tool work, and that is visible in our legislation.

      Er, this is turning into gibberish, but along with the wellfare this is an important thing to note. We are much closer to socialist economies than you'd think if you just said we have a free market.

  69. No no no by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    > Following your logic - which is indeed a possibility - isn't it OK to assume that the USA will do
    > the same with software made by US corporations and sold to Venezuela?

    He said GOVERNMENT computers. The US computers are made by PRIVATE companies. And we all know that private companies are lead by people with strong moral principles, which they would never sell out of to the government.

    1. Re:No no no by fsmunoz · · Score: 1

      Ehehehe. Quite :)

  70. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Both systems need to use force to take from productive people and give to people who are not productive.

    Also known as taxes. Something any government must collect, if it wishes to defend its people from other governments.

    And I, for one, really like the concept of welfare - makes life a lot less stressing when I know that financial difficulties don't lead to starvation.

    They also need to restrict what people can produce so that they do not compete with the inefficient state provided service.

    Please explain why a state-provided - and therefore tax-funded - service would need to compete with anything ? Furthermore, please explain how a state-provided - and therefore tax-funded - service could possibly lose any competition when it can be provided for free ?

    We also have democratically elected communist regimes in India in 2 states - both of those states (Kerala and WB) are economic basket cases which depend on other productive states for aid.

    Is communism cause or effect there ? Because, historically, it have been bad conditions for people which have spawned communistic regimes; in fact it were the intolerable conditions for industrial workers during industrialization which spawned communism itself.

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  71. rctv wasn't shut down by Rodong · · Score: 1

    You know that, right? They just had their broadcasting permit revoked, which means they will be continuing on cable and satelite tv. They we're just not permitted to go on transmitting on the airwaves, and i would guess that any tv channel that propagated for a cloody coup in the US would quickly get stopped too. There are regulations you know.

    1. Re:rctv wasn't shut down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I saw rctv producers and actors firing to Venezuela's military!

      No wait, I think Marcel Granier hired some blackwater mercenaries!

      My parrot repeats smarter things than you.

  72. Distro? by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

    Wondering which distro they are using, or whether they have rolled their own (and if so, whether their version is based on any particular distro or is their very own creation) ???

    --
    SARAVA!
  73. Cute by slysithesuperspy · · Score: 1

    I guess it's kind of cute, their socialist revolution and all, but hasn't Chavez noticed that socialism was the big failure of the 20th century!

    1. Re:Cute by Oktober+Sunset · · Score: 1

      kind of like capitalism was the big failure of the 16th century, before making a triumphant return in the 19th century.

  74. Sharing the soapbox by psyburn · · Score: 1
    I never said Chavez was the only one, my gripe here is over poorly disguised propaganda.

    You might want to loosen your tinfoil hat a bit. I think your getting a bit too much exposure to the paranoia waves.

    Besides, you don't whine nearly as much if you already have your passport. Nor if you read _all_ of the things about REALID. It will be as pain(ful/less) as renewing your drivers license.

    Blame gets us nowhere. If we do nothing then it's all wasted breath.

    When we don't like a representative we need to make a ruckus to tell our fellow citizens that that person has not help our situation and needs to be removed. Too bad you feel it's over, 'cause you've lost then. I wont give up. An election (for both President and Senate) is coming up also, you should pay attention for who best supports your purposes. Vote for him/her. We need Libertarian / Constitutionalists minded representatives (note: not politicans) (Yes we need them now! but the election is in 2008)

    Authortarianism (run following interests backed by Big Businesses) has ran rampant in this Congress for 7 years too long.

    It is the very thing Dwight D. Eisenhower warned us about.

    In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.

    Also you might want to tell (see also: annoy the hell out of...) your congressmen that you don't like (RealID/register-within-48-hours/prolonged-conflic t/corporate-monopolies).

    *sigh*, I'm just sharing the soapbox with G-Men.

    Side Note: this 4 times long than the original
    --
    This was brought to you buy the Department of Redundancy Department
  75. You mean like WW2? by Flying+pig · · Score: 1
    You may not have noticed, but in Europe at least the Axis was defeated primarily by two states that relied heavily on central planning: the USSR and Great Britain. In fact, Britain converted more of its economy proportionally to a war economy than did Germany.

    The USSR inherited what was basically a failed State - Russia - there were after all sound reasons why there were a series of revolutions in the early 1900s. Although the early USSR had a bad record, it was probably better than Tsarist Russia - only we don't know because under the tsars nobody knew or cared how many peasants were killed or starved every year. All the evidence seems to suggest that, for ordinary Russians, the Soviet Union was a better place to live than post-collapse "capitalist" Russia.

    And that's before we get started on success stories like Japan, whose post-war economic rise owed a lot to central planning. Or France.

    As for economists, they mostly function by telling the people with economic power what they want to hear. That's because they are economists...and they know how to maximise their own incomes. As Christopher Hitchens pointed out, only this weekend, on the American Civil War the Economist got it wrong (because they told the supporters of slavery and the South in the UK what they wanted to hear) while Karl Marx, no less, correctly predicted that the North would win and that it would have to bring about the end of slavery. You have to go to real academic economists, not popularists like the people you mention, (ones who win Nobel prizes, for instance) to find information about how so-called free markets do not in fact work because they are distorted in the interests of the people with the money.

    --
    Pining for the fjords
  76. One honest question by theolein · · Score: 1

    I have a bad reputation here on slashdot as being typically virulently anti-american, which is true to a certain extent, rational and irrational as it is, and mainly being based on my antipathy towards some people's WASP like xenophobia and arrogance. That said, I have one honest question:

    Why does the USA really hate Chavez so much? Honestly.

    It's not as if he's about to launch nukular weapons of mass destruction towards middle-income-ville USA. The western press demonstrably distorts what he does (The BBC for example, supposedly a shining example of unpartisan reporting, consistently gives more time to his opposition than to anything else he does or says, mostly since some rich British landowners unused land was forcibly bought by the Vz government). His diatribes are often all but mocked by the same western press resulting in the atitudes you see here on Slashdot.

    In fact, the only thing that I can see about Chavez is that he wakes some vague subconscious fear in westerners and especially americans, about "the red menace", but no one is ever able to clearly, using facts, to state exactly what is so "communist" about him or his policies, gioven that the same people think that social safety nets in Europe constitute "socialism" and are also a part of that same vague "red menace".

    If this is so, isn't it more likely that Western fairy tales about communism, that western forefathers use to scare their children into behaving themselves at night, are being exploited here?

    1. Re:One honest question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US hates Chavez because he was the replacement for the leaders who were more accomodating to the US.

      The US leaders behave as such because their handlers want them to be. Why else would Pat Robertson go on his tirade (besides getting on in years and probably losing grasp of self control).

    2. Re:One honest question by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

      The USA is a country. A country does not have emotions. Ask a wrong question and you get a wrong answer every time.

      --
      Don't piss off The Angry Economist
    3. Re:One honest question by gmgartner · · Score: 1

      The USA Government and the USA People are separate entities. Although our politicians are elected (presidents by Electoral College - not popular vote), as few as 40% of voters, in majority demographics, actually turn out to vote. I don't believe that the USA government's official dislike of Chavez is indicative of everyone in this country, nor is the official stance on the war in Iraq. This coming from a conservative Republican (me), should give one an idea of our current political atmosphere. If folks don't vote, we get the same old-same-old.

      --
      JMG
      rackIT.gartnerwebdev.com Fulfill your inner nerd.
  77. Re:Two words: Term Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Term limits are a crucial lynchpin concept of democracy. You mean "American Democracy".

    Without them, a leader need never fear answering for their actions. It's nice to see how answerable Bush & Co are for their actions.
  78. ok you have to understand where this comes from. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It actually comes from the concept of personal freedom; the freedom to do as you wish as long as it doesn't harm another. i.e. liberalism, which is ironic because the US have redefined liberal to mean socialist.

    You see, you cannot have freedom without responsibility, they are the same thing. If you take away someone's responsibilities you are also at the same time taking away their freedom. A socialist state removes the personal responsibility from the individual and at the same time removes those same freedoms, it cannot be avoided.

    Sweden, Norway and Denmark are not examples of socialist states, they are liberal democracies with market economies.

    --
    Deleted
  79. Re:Full featured linux distros Chavez Bashing by lsatenstein · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I appreciated your posting to which I am replying with questions. If there was no healthcare, it meant that there was no money being transfered from the rape of the countries resources by the oil monopoly. The rich take care of the rich and forget the rest, the oil money never tricked into the government coffers. It does now. Chavez, from what I read in our local press, is using the revenue money to create industries and work/jobs for his people. He may do it in a socialistic way, but at least he is doing it. Americans are a wonderful people. But American leaders have an agenda which is not what the founding fathers envisaged. The FF envisaged a democracy. But when one party remains in power too long, that parties objective is to stop serving the people, but to find ways to continue to remain in power. Ergo Power corrupts. And that is why Americans need a new broom. To sweep away the current jerk in power and to restore power to the people. Imagine, you, an american citizen, suspected (without real proof) could be shipped offshore for interrogation by cruel means. Don't say it cannot and does not happen. In closing, the American appetite for money before humanity (remember "In God We Trust, All others Cash" is what will destroy your great country. Chavez is raising the standard of knowledge of South Americans. He will be remembered as a hero. What about your presidents? How will they be remembered?

    --
    Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  80. The main point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For those who didn't get the main point of this:

    GPL really is ~communism as MS and other have asserted.

  81. Militarizing? by guerby · · Score: 1

    Right wing propaganda again, see some real data here.

    Average before Chavez military spending: 1.619 billions USD, average 1.6% of GDP

    Average Chavez military spending: 1.445 billions USD, average 1.2% of GDP

    Yes, in absolute dollar terms military spending as increased since the 2002 USA-backed coups (but who wouldn't do that?) but relative to GDP it has decreased, and by all measure it's less than previous kleptocrats did.

    Of course poverty has decreased and social spending increased, really bad bad bad.

  82. Re: Dragon Linux, brrraaaaauuummmmm .... by rbanffy · · Score: 1

    Either Intel or AMD (and, most probably, both) are quite happy.

    So, in the end, he IS paying US companies.

  83. Let's quote some Erich Fromm then by fritsd · · Score: 1
    Time for a wikiquote! :-)

    from "Escape from Freedom" (1941) "Greed is a bottomless pit which exhausts the person in an endless effort to satisfy the need without ever reaching satisfaction."

    Pity I can't find any quotes from his "Haben oder Sein"; I suspect it may even be relevant to this discussion although I'm probably off-topic again (sorry).

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  84. Typical Slashdot uninformed troll acting by ThiagoHP · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) The Amazon rainforest land is not good for agriculture.
    2) Brazil uses sugar cane, not corn, to produce ethanol.
    3) Sugar cane is grown in places far from the Amazon forest.
    Get your facts right before writing horseshit here. ;)

  85. 100% agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Profit has never equaled happiness.

    Profit merely offers more choices that poverty does not afford.

    Profit can be frittered away on consumerism that is ultimately fruitless, or on education, entertainment, charity or whatever.

    Profit = Choices

  86. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    Have you seen what the Chinese government says. They have repeatedly made statements that indicate that they believe that the US is their enemy. Fortunately, by the time that China has sufficient military and economic muscle to openly confront the US they will be facing a serious demographic problem (too many old people, not enough women). BTW, the confrontation will be over the independence of countries such as Taiwan, Japan, South Korea (North Korea is already a puppet state of China).

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  87. Venezuelan GULAG by tepples · · Score: 1

    Maybe you know what the Spanish word for "gulag" might be? GULAG was "Glavnoye Upravleniye Ispravitelno-trudovykh Lagerey i kolonii", or Chief Administration of Corrective Labor Camps and Colonies. This page appears to claim that Venezuela's counterpart is "Instituto Autónomo Caja de Trabajo Penitenciario".
  88. Hey, I can think of another state that does this: by Goatboy · · Score: 1

    "national socialism: using the economy of a country and it's means of production to further national agendas and it's manifested destination."

    This would also apply to the US, wouldn't it?

  89. Nice hardware by ghostbar38 · · Score: 0

    We have several of this computers in my university and the hardware is very good and very cheap but I haven't tried with the stock linux-distro...

    --
    ghostbar page.
  90. Godwin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chavez may seem like a bad man to some, but really is a result of the grass roots organising

    Hitler may have seemed like a bad man too, but really he was also a result of a grass roots organizing.

    Godwin's law has been invoked, this thread is done now.

  91. He's a dictator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have three Venezuelan friends that work here and the man is a tyrant. Venezuela was the first country freed by Simon Bolivar and it has become the first country put back into a dictatorship. If you think he is acting for the best interest of the people of Venezuela you are sadly mistaken and deluded. Venezuelans are losing their civil rights daily.

    Every time he takes another one away, he goes and hides in Ecuador for a while. The man has no balls and needs to be dethroned before it's too late.

  92. Radio by fritsd · · Score: 1
    I think he/she's referring to why it was severely punishable to own a Real Radio (TM) instead of a Volksempfaenger in the Netherlands during the '40-'45 occupation (http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_Oranje, in dutch). So it was more "intellectual nazi stuff" than "intellectual commie stuff" really ;-)

    I think pp means that with a "Chavez liberty Linux" computer, it may become illegal to run "imperialist capitalist swine" MS Minesweeper etc. I think this is a bit far fetched, personally. Still, it's better to guard the freedom of the Venezolans and make sure that Wine can run on those computers (and can run MS Minesweeper, MS Word etc.) so they can still sample all the Microsoft goodness and compare them to the (default) Linux installed programs.

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  93. VIT's own web page by randolph · · Score: 1

    Here. In Spanish, what else? Y'know, one doesn't have to pay the Microsoft tax on these; I wonder if we can buy them in the USA?

  94. D'oh misunderstood Volksempfänger reference by fritsd · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I get it now: the "great firewall of Venezuela", is that what you mean? Do you mean rigging of TCP/IP at the kernel level or filtering in userspace? Both cases I guess the answer would be to re-install a clean kernel and iptables and remove the "out-of-Venezuela" filter. Not trivial but it only has to be done once, then people can e-mail their workaround to people they trust and surf to RCTV International again ;-). I hear they mostly have soaps, anyway..

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  95. Where can I buy one? by rhinokitty · · Score: 1

    I want to put my money where my mouth is and support socialism with the good old USD! Where can I buy one of these machines of The People? Link anyone?

    1. Re:Where can I buy one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, you will be able to buy them as soon as we finish building the latin america's oleoduct, rebuilding the Vargas state, building that underwater tunnel in the Maracaibo lake, building the rocket launching station,

      Notice any trend here?

  96. Venezula? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Could you at least correct the name of my country on this post title? it is embarrassing.

  97. No, it's the same game there. by twitter · · Score: 1

    Might also have something to do with $12++ million dollar salaries for CEO. My bet is a Chinese CEO makes less than the cleaning staff at your US office and actually works for the company full time.

    Party big wigs in China clean up just like US executives do but that does not matter. If they were free, their wages would rise just like they have in Japan and every other part of the free, industrialized world. Both US and Chinese executives are exploiting non free Chinese work. That exploitation has cheapened everyone else.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  98. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by BgJonson79 · · Score: 1

    Because all corporations in China are owned, at least partly, by the gov't?

    Your oil point is dead on though. We should be weening ourselves off everyone's oil, not looking for an easy fix. Then we can tell all these people to piss off.

    --

    There are four boxes used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order.

  99. Country name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wanted to let you know the country's name is "Venezuela", not "Venezula". Gracias.

    -Rollin

  100. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by Confuzzled · · Score: 1

    More than one "hate his guts".
    I would be interested to know why exactly.

    l'll tell you why. I grew up in Venezuela, I'm now in the US, working after getting a degree; hoping for better times. Before you say "oh, you're the elite" I'll have you know that I was part of the _tiny_ middle class in Venezuela (both working parents). I was lucky enough to come to the US because I have some relatives here. If you add up our income we would be considered poor in the US.

    Chavez has convinced people that the reason they are poor, is because of the ruling upper class. However, up to 90% of the countries income is fueled by the oil industry. So what that means, is that private business accounts for at most 10-20% of the income of the country. So the truth of the matter is that the reason everyone's poor in Venezuela, is that the income from the oil industry was _wasted_ and never used to create industry and infrastructure.

    It has never been argued that there wasn't rampant corruption in the US, and that those in power filled their coffers while the poor continued to get poorer. But equating these incumbents with "the rich" or "the ruling elite" is wrong. Most of everyone I know that had money, had it because they had businesses, factories, etc. Not because their family had anything to do with the government. In fact, it has always been looked down on to have anything to do with the government; as you were most likely corrupt.

    Chavez has rewritten history and equated these two groups: the people that got money from their hard work (including a lot of portuguese, spanish and italian immigrants) and actually brought some money into the country; with those that have actively been in the government and wasted and misused money; or have just given it away to the poor.

    Chavez is not completely bad, but if you actually see his achievements from the "ground level" you'll see that there's more rhetoric than action. However I must admit that he's probably done more for the poor than any other president: Free Clinics, Free Schools, ,etc. However, doing just that will never help the poor prosper, nor will it bring more money into a very poor country. Do the poor live any better than they ever have before? Do they have any more jobs, income, etc? If you look at the numbers, they claim that unemployment is way down as of 2005, lower than it has ever been, yet somehow over 50% of these workers work in the informal sector. How Convenient.

    The Claims that the broadcast channel aided the coup are completely ridiculous. But that's for another post. There's just so much to write, so much happened while I was there. There were so many protests. The biggest one happened because he put some decrees in the books that are ridiculous: Do you know they can take your land if you're not actively using it? Do you know that decree 1011 has inspectors, that if they believe a teacher isn't teaching "bolivarian principles" they can get fired? There are so many examples, it's truly scary. Here in the US you get a little scared because of domestic wiretapping, what he's done is so much worse.

  101. Funny you should mention it... by PaulBu · · Score: 1

    ... I was just going to say the same -- it would be much more impressive if one of the "socialist" countries would come up with a processor to beat Intel/AMD/IBM/etc. Nope, does not seem to work...

    Relying on your natural resources (and selling them to your "worst enemy"), while being engaged in propaganda war is not exactly the smartest move from my point of view -- but then, I grew up in the Soviet Russia, and maintain the position that Soviet Union collapse was mainly due to the falling oil prices.

    Paul B.

  102. What OS wil it run? by Unnamed+Chickenheart · · Score: 1

    ...Mayhap Venezuela's own Yellow Hat Linux? =P

    --
    urd
  103. Agreed by ja · · Score: 1

    Ay ay Sir ... Right on target! :-D

    --

    send + more == money? ...
  104. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by dbIII · · Score: 1
    I suggest paying attention to what is happening now instead of recycling early Nixon rhetoric. North Korea a puppet state of China? Where did all those refugees near the Korean border come from then and why did they flee into China?

    What are they teaching kids these days?

  105. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    Have you noticed that Korea is a peninsula? North Korea has two land borders. One with China and one with South Korea. The border with South Korea is heavily fortified with large armies on both sides and mine fields. So, if you are starving to death, where are you going to go? Across the border that is almost certain death, or across the relatively more open border to China? and oh yeah, the Chinese send most of those they catch back. So, maybe you should pay attention to what is going on instead of recycling the Vietnam War protester rhetoric.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  106. Re:Bombing begins in 5 minutes. by dbIII · · Score: 1
    I was talking to somebody from the province of China that ajoins North Korea this morning and they will be back there tomorrow morning, so I'm paying attention. I suggest you pay attention as well. It is a seperate country that is pretty heavily isolated from China as well as the rest of the world - there's no point recycling the naive Vietnam is run out of the Kremlin then Beijing garbage. If it was being run out of China it would be part of China - that is the way they do things there - consider Tibet. If you were paying attention you would have heard of the refugees that were not sent back for humanitarian reasons. I am not defending China just pointing out some ignorance.

    I suggest reading the world news section of a newspaper - they are online now.

  107. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mad Zambian, if ever there was a triple bonus karma point option, you deserve it.

  108. Bush isn't worse than Chavez. by tjstork · · Score: 0, Troll

    The left wing tells plenty of lies about George Bush, and vice versa, but you don't see Bush throwing the likes of Michael Moore in jail.

    That's the one key difference.

    Another other is that socialism as an economic policy has so completely and consistently failed to make really positive advances in the living standards of the world that it really ought to be as wrong to advocate it as much it might be wrong to advocate a return to feudalism and serfdom (which, incidentally, is the same as socialism anyway).

    Dicators and socialists have to go. Even Chomskey concedes that tolerance for dictatorships helps sew the seeds of 9/11. Thus, while I do not agree with Bush's USA PATRIOT act, or his handling of the war in Iraq, the application of the Wilsonian idea to bring freedom to the world is a damned good one.

    --
    This is my sig.
    1. Re:Bush isn't worse than Chavez. by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      "Thus, while I do not agree with Bush's USA PATRIOT act, or his handling of the war in Iraq, the application of the Wilsonian idea to bring freedom to the world is a damned good one."

      I really do prefer democracy and the rule of law over any of the various alternatives, but shoveling a democracy down someone's throat right after bombing them back to stone age and invading their country is not my idea if a good way to do it. The very ideals the "liberators" propose risk becoming just as much unpopular as their use of force.

      You can't "give" freedom. Unless people really understand it and want it, they won't keep it. Real freedom must come from a long process that may - or may not (we don't know enough) - start with education and a really good, borderline paranoid (against the government), constitution.

  109. I wonder if is going to happen... by Ateocinico · · Score: 1

    Here in Venezuela we are still waiting for the realization of at least these government projects promissed by the president himself:
    - Gallineros verticales (vertical chicken farm)
    - Conucos organoponicos (Organically fertilized intensive urban agriculture)
    - Ruta de la empanada (tamale track, for tourism...)
    - Eje Orinoco-Apure (Apure-Orinoco rivers development axis)
    - Palma aceitera indonesia (Indonesian oil palm for the development of the arid inner flatlands)
    - Project with Ukraine for the development of a rocket launching base
    - A 1500MUS$ aluminium plant suposedly agreed with the french government seven years ago.
    - The reconstrucion of Vargas state after the massive landslides of year 2000

    That just to name a few. The government oficially employs and deploys only open software, but their bureocrats use only MS Office and its data formats. In spanish it is said: "Ver para creer". That means: "Seeing is believing". And in this government of Mr. Chavez, speeches and realizations are orthogonal.

  110. FUD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You hate chavez? why?

    Because he stoped rich american oil lobbies from taking venezuela's Oil, and instead he wants to exploit it for their own people?????

    Seriously dude, the USA is SCREWING North America big time. All these civil wars and dictators are empowered by CIA and US money to keep these countries unstable and steal their oil and resources.

    And war on drugs???? That's the bigest joke. Chavez wants to free cocaine for all!

  111. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I generally consider myself a libertarian, and for the most part communism/socialism isn't the most efficient way for an economy to function. The main reason the the economy for Venezuela is functioning better (e.g. inflation while very high is going down) is pretty much solely due to high oil prices. Guess what happens when Americans start to make better choices in their energy selection and reduce the demand for oil. After all roughly 90% of the US believe in global warming and something like half believe it's man made. Just type Prius sales into Google and you will find article after article detailing how well they are selling. By 2020 Toyota has said they want all of their cars to be hybrids. I give the economy in Venezuela about 10 years before it has a pretty big collapse.

  112. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by mi_cuenta · · Score: 1

    That sounds soooooo nice. And when any of this will start happening? I mean, the plan sounds terrific, but the praxis seems a bit slow. He has been 9 years in power. Isn't 9 years enough to at least show some results?

    --
    /.
  113. Open Source saves at least 40% on system cost. by gmgartner · · Score: 1

    When you remove all proprietary software from a computer you save at least 40%. A server example: Microsoft Small Business Server with all the "bells and whistles" (third party spam/virus filter for exchange - add another $1000.00 + per seat fees) and 5 Client Access Licenses wholesale cost around $900.00, more CAL's = more $$, and 8 - 12 hours setup on a hotrod system. *nix with all of the features that I need including spam/virus filter for the email and unlimited access - $0.00 and 8-12 hours setup on a not so hotrod system (no gui means more resources for services). More features, better reliability, hmmm... seems like a no brainer. No memory leak issues on the *nix box either. I have several MS SBS installations in the field that require weekly rebooting. Uptime on my main server: 89 days (there was a power problem 90 days ago). Since this is being instituted by Chavez, watch out for "Linux is anti-American" backlash. ;)

    --
    JMG
    rackIT.gartnerwebdev.com Fulfill your inner nerd.
  114. Hmm, not so fast . . . by SpeedyGonz · · Score: 1

    *** Long rant warning ***

    Hey there, a couple of my own counterpoints, and i'm here in the trenches in Venezuela, so I can give you a first hand account. It might sound a little biased at times, I admit, but It's all based on what I see everyday.

    Venezuela is a Democracy. They have elections every so often so the people get to decide who gets to run the place. They have decided that they prefer Chavez to the alternatives.
    That is, of course, if you trust a first time electronic-vote election without giving the oposing party access to a paper trail to check the validity of it. Even if that was allowed, neighbors of mine got a "No" when they actually pressed "Yes" to the question of "would you like to terminate the mandate of the president blah, blah" (don't reember the exact wording of the question). Whoever bitched about that too loudly was arrested for interfering with the election. I'm not making this up.


    Chavez is not a communist. He is a socialist. There is a huge difference.
    Well, yes, I agree there is a difference in those two concepts. But I think you missed a wee little speech he gave here a couple of weeks ago (maybe more) when he openly admitted he was a comunist (not a sociallist, but a full fledged communist) and that "my mentor has always been Fidel Castro", and another one in which he ordered all his followers (and he seems to think that means everyone) to give up material goods because being "rich" was a bad thing: if you own two fridges, put one on the village's square, if you own two cars give away one...

    Of course, that came much to the dismay to some of his cronies, who own factories bought with state money and usually ride Hummer H2s and H3s, not unlike Kim Jong Il's ass-kissers. In the end I doubt those pay the price of their corruption, as long as they stay faithful to the "Proceso"

    His socialist view is that *all* of the people of Venezuela should have affordable healthcare, at very low cost, if not free.
    It might have been lacking in terms of quality, I will quickly admit, but there has been a social security system in this country for the better part of the 20th century, if not earlier.

    It's been good at times, dismal at others, specially after the eighties in which it got terminally bad. It wasn't free as in you never pay anything but you just paid a small fee out of your paycheck every month and you were automatically a benefficiary. Again, it's in horrible shape (still), but it exists and has existed for a long time.

    As for Chavez bringing free healthcare for everyone, I admit he has done some good things here and there, but given the amount of cash this country is receiving and taking into account that he took office in 1999, we should already have a top notch public health system and the sad reality is we don't, period.


    His socialist view is that *all* of the people should have low cost /free education.
    Oooook...
    First, Cost: there's been almost-free education (1000 Bs., less than 50 Dollar cents a full semester tuition; 5 Bs, less than a Dollar cent per meal in the mess hall, for at least the past 20 years in the UCV, anybody?) in this country for the past 50-odd years, so nothing new here, pure BS from the "Chavistas".
    Second, Quantity: Anybody could get up to high school without any problems, getting into a college was a little trickier because of admission exams and quotas and such. Some corruption might have played a part in depleting quotas, however, like parents paying admittance officials to get their cherubs in.
    Third, Quality: Venezuela, over those "democracy" years openly demonized by chavez followers, has produced a lot of quality professionals, college professors were usually recognized scientists and scholars and (in the public colleges at least) almost free. Not everyone got in, but then again not everyone should get in, only those good enough to withstand the grind that produc

    1. Re:Hmm, not so fast . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very well written, and I can say by first hand all he says is true.
      100 mill apartment??? I haven't seen anything for less than 200 mill, rents run for 2 mill minimum.

  115. Re:Go Team Ven, ezuelan Penguin! by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Furthermore, please explain how a state-provided - and therefore tax-funded - service could possibly lose any competition when it can be provided for free ? Because it isn't free. It can't be free. There's no such thing as free. Everything requires some resource to accomplish whether it's materials, time, experience and someone always pays.

    --
    Deleted
  116. Why is their GOVERNMENT announcing this? by rdmiller3 · · Score: 1

    I'd be a lot more optimistic about this if it had been a Venezuelan company announcing this.

  117. Well-fare? by Nicolay77 · · Score: 1

    Your post makes me think that the best possible country is not a pure capitalist or socialist state, but in fact a well-fare state.

    Long life for the well-fare state !!!!!

    --
    We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.