Slashdot Mirror


US Blocks Entry For German Black Hat Presenter

bushwhacker2000 alerts us to the dilemma of Thomas Dullien, a prominent security researcher who has been a fixture at the annual Black Hat security conference. Dullien was denied entry into the US on his way to this year's conference. Dullien, a German reverse-engineering expert known in hacker circles as "Halvar Flake," said he was blocked from entering the US on the technicality that he had (years ago) signed a contract with Black Hat as an individual, not as his company. Customs agents said he would need an H1-B visa to perform the contracted two days of training at Black Hat, and put him on the next plane back to Germany.

348 comments

  1. O well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... next time they will just find one did not brush well enough.

    1. Re:O well... by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What is that? A conspiracy theory? You know it's all his own fault.

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    2. Re:O well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Face it, 60 years isn't enough time to forgive them.

  2. Hurrah! by zmollusc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Another evil terrorist plot foiled! Tax me some more so i can be even safer!

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    1. Re:Hurrah! by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Troll

      Oh fuck off. It's not some big conspiracy. You need a visa to ***WORK*** in the states as a non citizen. He didn't have one and thus was denied entry. I'm sure if I flew over to Germany they'd be all cool with me [a non-citizen/resident] just taking up any old job.

      Actually, the only EU country I know of that lets Cannucks work there [without a visa] is France. Which oddly enough is more than what the UK permits and we're supposed to be all family or something...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Hurrah! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Uh, it's a conference. Pretty much any conference has workshops and/or tutorials. The presenters are usually paid (at least expenses), and very often foreign. I've been to conferences in the EU where people from the US gave workshops and tutorials, and ones in the USA where people from the EU gave them. I've seen people from China, South Korea and Japan give them at both.

      If this is a precedent, then it means that conferences in the USA will only have tutorials run by natives, reducing the quality (since you'll only get the best of a subset of your attendees able to give them, rather than the best).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Hurrah! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I've been to several IACR conferences and Toorcon multiple times. I was never paid to speak at Toorcon, and IACR speakers are not paid either.

      And you *can* give a free talk in the states without a work visa. So long as you're not getting paid [or staying longer than the tourist visa allows] they don't care.

      So if he just forfeited his pay, he could have done the talk easily. Another way that is legal is to have someone else buy the airfare [if that's the hangup]. afaik it's not illegal to be flown to a conference to give an otherwise free talk, it's probably borderline illegal though, but he could easily and truthfully respond he's not getting paid :-) [receiving a gift en lieu of pay is still considered consideration...]

      Anyways, ... not all conferences have paid speakers, and even the ones that do, still have unpaid sessions/tracks.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Hurrah! by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      I'm sure if I flew over to Germany they'd be all cool with me [a non-citizen/resident] just taking up any old job.

      He wasn't "taking up any old job" he was simply doing training for a conference. Under the right circumstances, he needs no visa to do that, but the right circumstances require just the right wording on paper.

      And for what it's worth, if you flew over to Germany you could do the same--be sent over for business purposes--for 90 days, without a visa.

    5. Re:Hurrah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me get this straight. Black Hat and he never bothered to change the contract and didn't make sure they'd be in compliance with applicable law and just assumed because he came in without an issue one year he could continue to do so.

      That's crap. He screwed up and he's blaming the US for enforcing its laws as its right to do as a sovereign nation.

      Sounds to me like you are whining like Lindsey Lohan or some other self-important person who believes laws don't apply to them. Welcome to reality, you're just like everyone else. Get in the queue, make sure your contract is in order, and have a nice time while visiting the USA.

    6. Re:Hurrah! by Jeremy_Bee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is hardly an insightful comment and should be modded down if only for the bad attitude and swear words. In fact it seems like whomever posted this did not even read the blog in question.

      The blogger makes several excellent points about how foolish the whole situation was, how the application of the law was inconsistent relative both to similar situations in the US as well as international standards, and proffered two different, "do-able," legal solutions that were promptly ignored by the "officers" in question.

      The US immigration/Visa regulations are well-known around the world to be something out of the dark ages.
      Simply saying "well that's the law" is not informative or illuminating in any way.

    7. Re:Hurrah! by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many people come to the states legally each day, let alone year. If he filled the paperwork properly like he was supposed to, this wouldn't be an issue.

      Arguing whether their should even be such draconian measures is a different issue altogether.

      For example, suppose I get busted for selling pot in the states. Sure we can sit and talk about the need for said laws, but currently it is on the books, and that's all that matters as far as the law is concerned.

      As others pointed out, he could have given the talk via the web [e.g. teleconference] which would have been perfectly legal [oddly enough]. He could have forfeited his pay, he could have filed the correct paperwork, etc, etc...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    8. Re:Hurrah! by badfish99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The US immigration/Visa regulations are well-known around the world to be something out of the dark ages.

      It's not just the US: most countries have bizarre immigration laws.
      The beauty of immigration laws, from the point of view of the government, is that they can be as screwed-up as you like, and no-one is ever going to do anything about it. By definition, none of people affected have got a vote, and once they have been turned away they are in no position to fight back through the legal system. So immigration laws are always arbitrary, capricious and unfair: the way all laws would be if the power of the government were not balanced by the courts.

    9. Re:Hurrah! by HalvarFlake · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is no conspiracy, just a misunderstanding between legal systems and an apparent unwillingness to resolve the issue. Generally, it is not a problem for a Canadian or a US Citizen to come to Europe to perform a service for a few days which he invoices from the US. In Germany, the rule is that he must not spend more than 6 months in Germany lest he falls under German employment law (and needs a work permit etc). It is not a problem as an American to enter Germany, conduct a trainings class (that is not offered by anyone else anywhere), and leave three days later. Also, as far as I am informed, had the agreement for payment been signed by my current full-time employer (a German company), the entire thing would have been no problem -- it is legitimate for a German company to send an employee abroad to conduct a trainings class. The agreement was signed by me though, several years ago. Under German tax law, there's a special status for certain specialized tasks (amongst others, specialized teachings) that allows one to act in some aspects like a 1-person-company. Think of this as a more restricted form of freelancing (e.g. you can't just decide to have said status if you're a programmer, you have to qualify for it due to the specializedness of whatever it is that you're doing). The issue now is that today's custom agent did not treat this any different from a regular Joe trying to get into the US for a full-time job. Which this isn't. It's more that someone 'specialized' is contracted in from abroad for two days to provide expertise not available locally. I hope this clarifies the situation a bit.

    10. Re:Hurrah! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      While I agree things could be better ... you have no right to visit another country unless prescribed by treaty [e.g. EU, maybe even nafta]. For example, if I were to visit Romania [hey, they got wicked tuica] they probably could arbitrarily deny my entry without any legal recourse whatsoever. I don't have a right to visit the country.

      Now it's stupid and bad for the economy to outright deny visitors/tourists/etc. Point being though it isn't a right. If anyone should fight for it, it should be the citizens. However, the states like most fairly well off countries [e.g. Canada, UK, France, etc] are plagued by undocumented, often unqualified labour forces. So there is a fairly strong sentiment against work visas in the first place.

      Not saying it's right, it's just the way things are. Of course it doesn't help peoples causes when they encourage the activity. Maybe, if, for example, Mexico wasn't so back-asswards and corrupt they would put their foot down on illegals who get deported back to Mexico [e.g. jail time or something]. Similar for others like India, who routinely host scores of unqualified staff [re: call centers] that plague western civilization...

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    11. Re:Hurrah! by JimDaGeek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hi Tom.

      You are an asshole.

      Take care :-)

      --
      General, you are listening to a machine! Do the world a favor and don't act like one.
    12. Re:Hurrah! by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      The blogger makes several excellent points about how foolish the whole situation was, how the application of the law was inconsistent relative both to similar situations in the US as well as international standards, and proffered two different, "do-able," legal solutions that were promptly ignored by the "officers" in question.
      Personally, I am very skeptical that any pay arrangement would make the teaching of tutorials at a conference legal without an H1-B or some other visa that expressly allows the holder to work.

      My guess is that it many people do come into the US in similar circumstances, but that does not make it legal. Also, using the visa waiver program may be a mistake -- it's not just a visa that is waived, but also any rights that the person attempting to enter US might hold are waived.

      Break the rules, get sent home. That's just the processes working properly.

      Now, as to whether those rules are sensible or in the best interest of the USA, that's different. It seems to me that there should be a process that would allow very limited "work" under an B1 (visitor) visa. Already the line between business meetings and work is somewhat gray, but in this case, his entry was entirely about work to be performed in the USA.
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    13. Re:Hurrah! by Linker3000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A few years back I was contracted to run 2 x 1 week 'train the trainer' technical courses in the USA based on a training course I had developed. Being an upstanding UK citizen, I applied to the US embassy in London for a H1-B visa and the application was refused for (something like) 'insufficient details of nature of visit'. When I rang the visa enquiries line, I was connected to a call centre in Scotland that said they could provide no assistance as they were not embassy staff and all they could do was send me another form - and, no, they could not put me through the the embassy.

      Armed with absolutely no knowledge of what information was missing from my application, I approached American Express who have a visa checking service - I took my application to their office in London (a 1.5 hour train ride), paid £70 extra for a 'personal service' and they checked over my application, gave it their 'OK' and submitted it to the Embassy by courier for same day processing. Guess what - same rejection.

      In desperation, I approached a relative who worked in a different embassy in London and explained my dilemma - they rang a contact in the US embassy who put me in touch with someone in the visa department who agreed to look at my documents and call me back. After several hours, they called and said I would need a signed letter from the US training company confirming that they needed me to run the courses as there was no-one suitable in the USA who could do it. I arranged this by fax and then was later invited to the US embassy to get my visa - by now, this was the day before I was due to fly out!

      But that's not the end of it - now when visiting the USA on holiday and filling in the visa waiver form on the plane, I have to answer 'yes' to the question asking whether I have ever been refused a US visa; this now guarantees me a near 100% chance of being stopped at US immigration for an interview, which generally goes like this:

      * Sit in a waiting room for an hour
      * Get called into interview room
      * Asked why a visa was refused
      * Explain the fax I had to arrange
      * Asked 'is that all'?
      * Told I am free to go

      And this was all well before 9/11 etc.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    14. Re:Hurrah! by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      The problem with your argument is that in the borderline cases they will deport you anyway then sort it out later.

      He never got to see a courtroom or any due process, he just got put on a return flight. He also may have had to pay for his return flight or get his embassy to pay. If the embassy paid, they will charge him later.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    15. Re:Hurrah! by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe, if, for example, Mexico wasn't so back-asswards and corrupt they would put their foot down on illegals who get deported back to Mexico...

      Maybe, possibly, if, for example, the US wasn't meddling and propping up the corrupt Mexican government for its own personal gain, those illegals you so flippantly disparage would be more than happy to stay home with their families, instead of risking abuse and death just trying to keep them alive. Yours and all borders are nothing more than global Jim Crow laws. Despite all the eloquent talk they exist solely to keep the slave trade alive. And another thing, despite the overt violations practiced by all governments and the general attitude of the general population towards these atrocities, all people have a right to travel and live where they please. Unfortunately none of the weaponry throughout the whole world is being used to protect those rights, but freedom to travel is every bit as inalienable as that of the right to speak freely, and we have an obligation to enforce these rights.

      ...plagued by undocumented, often unqualified labour forces.

      Please! Spare us the racist pap. Unless you're working for the Klan, that's not helping anybody's cause either.

      --
      What?
    16. Re:Hurrah! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      Please! Spare us the racist pap. Unless you're working for the Klan, that's not helping anybody's cause either.

      Oh, I'm sorry, for a second there I thought the millions of people who invade the states, canada, the UK, etc in undocumented fashions DIDN'T have an education. Don't tell me that your typical mexican import is just as qualified to be, say, a cryptographer as I am. Give me a break. Granted, they're not working in that line of work, enough of them are in things like construction, or factory work where some training is probably required.

      As for the "right to travel" that isn't a basic human right recognized by any country on this planet. Sure, they grant the right of travel within their borders [e.g. from one province to another, from one state to another, etc] but that's about it.

      It's important to keep tabs on who is in your country for many reasons, least of all is your own damn safety. Suppose, you illegally enter Canada, and get lost/hurt/abducted/etc. How is the Canadian government supposed to notify your family if they don't even know you're here? Not only that, but the amount of people our services can support is limited and must be accounted for. If millions of undocumented people flooded say Toronto or Ottawa in a single year, the cities would be instantly crippled.

      As for propping up the Mexican government, I have no real idea what the USA's involvement is. All I'm gonna say is that the Mexicans themselves could stand for a little more responsibility out of their government.

      Remember, there was a time when Americans were British.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    17. Re:Hurrah! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 0, Troll

      What fascinates me is that people want to vote for politicians whose platform includes extending governmental interference in life, particularly in the realms of health and retirement.
      O'Rourke: "Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys."

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    18. Re:Hurrah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      Tommy is a racist and much, much more. Check out his posting history on sci.crypt via Google Groups. He has a long history of antagonizing people and self-aggrandizement that dates back to his childhood, which wasn't that long ago. His mental age is about 17. No telling what stunted his growth, but I suspect it has to do with being confined to his parents basement for his formative years when he should have been going out and developing some social skills. And he harbors a deep resentment toward the substandard education he was forced to endure (in his mind).

    19. Re:Hurrah! by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Actually his mistake was in his contract with the conference people, he should simply have reversed the process and made the company complete the paperwork. They send him the application, he fills it out and sends it back to them and leaves all further hassles, paperwork and costs up to them ie. their government, their problem.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    20. Re:Hurrah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least UK and Canada have taken the same position that US Customs/Immigration took in this case -- with respect to non-UK and non-CA people visiting to give a tutorial at a conference held there. The US position is quite normal, not at all strange.

    21. Re:Hurrah! by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Remember, there was a time when Americans were British.

      There was a time when there was a balance of power.

      As for the "right to travel" that isn't a basic human right recognized by any country on this planet.

      Lack of recognition does not invalidate a right.

      I have no real idea what the USA's involvement is.

      Yes. You have made that perfectly clear. You have no idea.

      Bah! Keep your damn blinders on. Your antipathy is boundless and quite tiresome. Looks like Canada has plenty of rednecks, too. That to be expected in "fairly well off countries" while enslaving those outside its border for their own benefit through things like weapon sales to oppressive governments to make sure their resources remain freely available. Life is nice on the right end of the big stick. It's good to be king, eh? Off to Hades with you.

      --
      What?
    22. Re:Hurrah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shows how little confidence you have in your own country. You see it descending into something like Mugabe's Zimbabwe, rather than ascending to something like Canada. Pathetic, really.

    23. Re:Hurrah! by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Check out his posting history...

      Ne need. He has made himself quite clear already. I don't need to see any more of that dribble than I already have. He's just trolling for dollars. Never can tell if it's serious over these types of forums, but unfortunately, people do actually believe in this crap and millions are murdered because of it. He's just another animal marking his territory. He punishes people for being born in the wrong place and for being the wrong color. A real human doesn't believe in such nonsense. A real human knows true freedom and would never deny it to anybody in such an arbitrary fashion.

      --
      What?
    24. Re:Hurrah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The answer is pretty obvious....

      Traveling to the US is becoming a pain and everyday, it is getting worse due to "security".

      All of these conferences should just move to Canada, or Mexico, or Costa Rica.

      I am from Costa Rica, and you won't have any of these nonsense, plus you get a vacation too :)

      The US is on an economic suicide path.

      AC

    25. Re:Hurrah! by HeroreV · · Score: 1

      ie. their government, their problem It's possible he actually wants to do a presentation for reasons other than financial gain. In such a case, it would be his problem. Not everybody does everything just for the money.
    26. Re:Hurrah! by Thomas+Shaddack · · Score: 1

      However, if you misstate that you are doing something for money, most officials immediately believe you.

    27. Re:Hurrah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only now Romania is in the EU...

    28. Re:Hurrah! by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      Its not a good idea giving hackers a motive :P

    29. Re:Hurrah! by homer_ca · · Score: 1

      Personally, I am very skeptical that any pay arrangement would make the teaching of tutorials at a conference legal without an H1-B or some other visa that expressly allows the holder to work.

      My guess is that it many people do come into the US in similar circumstances, but that does not make it legal. I am not an immigration lawyer, but if it's true that any paid speaker needs a work visa, the people skirting this law aren't exactly low-profile. How is this any different from someone like say, Mikhail Gorbachev or the Dalia Lama coming to the US to give a speech? And I guarantee you those people charge a large speaking fee.
    30. Re:Hurrah! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Zimbabwe, Canada, the US: all populated by people. What's your point?

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    31. Re:Hurrah! by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      How is this any different from someone like say, Mikhail Gorbachev or the Dalia Lama coming to the US to give a speech? And I guarantee you those people charge a large speaking fee.
      Good question. I don't really know the answer except to suggest that they are well known individuals and the various agencies turn a blind eye? Or perhaps they actually get a suitable visa?

      There are many types of visas available and it is not entirely impossible that these type of people may be quaified to get something that allows them to give speeches. In fact, perhaps the subject of the story could have got a visa that would make his visit entirely legal.
      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    32. Re:Hurrah! by mahmud · · Score: 1

      You would get his point, if you would actually stop and think about it. Try to learn something about other countries first. Northern Europe has huge governments that don't interfere with peoples' privacy, let the businesses run smoothly, keep the cities clean of crime and trash, and make sure people are not becoming bums against their will. US has a weak government that only goes to war and limits individual freedoms. See the difference?

      And people are not all the same. Some people are ignorant fools who need a shepherd, while others are free individuals willing and able to cooperate for the common good, while upholding their own private interests.

    33. Re:Hurrah! by crawling_chaos · · Score: 1

      And we all know how well Junior did when he got a hold of whiskey (and the coke spoon.) No wonder we're in such a fine mess.

      --
      You can only drink 30 or 40 glasses of beer a day, no matter how rich you are.
      -- Colonel Adolphus Busch
    34. Re:Hurrah! by lordmage · · Score: 1

      How exactly were you "refused" entry? you just had an "iterative Visa process". You still got entry and just had issues with paperwork. No reason to say you were refused entry at this stage because you were not.

      --
      I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
    35. Re:Hurrah! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes, my wife is from Germany, and I'm nearly conversational in German, and I think that the Eurabian nanny states have some extreme crises to face in the coming decades.
      I suppose I take a dim view to this assertion "Some people are ignorant fools who need a shepherd". In an acute sense, we all have our need for societal structures to help out. Chronically, big government societal structures appear a cure worse than whatever disease they were trying to combat.
      Equality of opportunity, not condition, say I.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    36. Re:Hurrah! by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      You American guys have been predicting crises in our governments for the past 40 years.

      Still aint happening. And remember which country has the largest governmnet foreign debt in the world (Why its the USA!)

      Not everyone wants to live in America bro.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    37. Re:Hurrah! by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      If you are not doing it for the money, then you should specifically pass those kind of hassles off to the conference people, they are in a better position dealing with their local government, they also can get practised at it and set up a system.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    38. Re:Hurrah! by smittyoneeach · · Score: 1

      Oh, things will muddle along, from a purely governmental POV.
      It's the demographics that are worrisome in the next decade or three.
      Then again, maybe the Brussels Journal has too much starch in its metaphorical underwear.
      You know, the advent of the internet really makes these considerations of which country you're in relatively less important. No one exceeds one heartbeat from death; enjoy where you are.

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    39. Re:Hurrah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was refused a visa. I'm not particularly sure if he/she really wants to be telling people in Gitmo the 'iterative visa process' and paperwork claim while being waterboarded after the immigration officers realise he was refused a visa twice and call in the big boys...

    40. Re:Hurrah! by lordmage · · Score: 1

      Traveling a lot I find out that CANADA is a hard country to get into.

      The paperwork if you are doing business is heavier than the laptop.

      --
      I can program myself out of a Hello World Contest!!
  3. The law is the law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It sucks, but you can't expect immigration officials to randomly let people into the country just because they feel like it.

    1. Re:The law is the law... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Well ... I presume the man had a passport, so I don't think this qualifies as "random" exactly, matter of fact given their rationale for sending him packing I'd say it was pretty well targeted. The Feds seem to be sending a "we don't want your kind here" message.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:The law is the law... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      A passport is required to get a TOURIST visa, which does not allow you to take up residence or work. You're right, they don't want his "kind" there. That would be the illegal alien kind.

      It's one thing to argue the benefits of controlling the migration of labour, but it's not rational to assume this is because he's a "hacker" [oooh spooky!]. Most of the time when I told the US customs that I was going to give talks at Toorcon [or whatever] they didn't even know what cryptography was, let alone that it was all dangerous and "against the interests of the united states government." Mostly they just asked if I was paid, once I said it was a free presentation they told me to fuck off and board my plane.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    3. Re:The law is the law... by forkazoo · · Score: 1

      A passport is required to get a TOURIST visa, which does not allow you to take up residence or work. You're right, they don't want his "kind" there. That would be the illegal alien kind.

      It's one thing to argue the benefits of controlling the migration of labour, but it's not rational to assume this is because he's a "hacker" [oooh spooky!]. Most of the time when I told the US customs that I was going to give talks at Toorcon [or whatever] they didn't even know what cryptography was, let alone that it was all dangerous and "against the interests of the united states government." Mostly they just asked if I was paid, once I said it was a free presentation they told me to fuck off and board my plane.

      Tom


      I don't know that he was singled out, but I do think that the policy goes too far. I mean, fine, the border agent says, "Hey, I see you haven't got a work permit, but you are apparently here to do some work." Then, there are two options...

      - "You are allowed to have a tourist visa, so you can come and hang out and get some vacation snapshots. If, while you are here, you can get your paperwork straightened out, then you can do some work for money. Otherwise, you could lecture for free or something, so long as it isn't for money. If our records indicate that you got paid for work while on the tourist visa, you'll be prosecuted, and we do have an extradition treaty with Germany."

      - "OUT, Foreign CUR! AWAY!"

      I don't see why turning him back at the border was an effective use of American resources. It cost me tax money to put him on the next airplane out, and it cost my country in terms of knowledge that would have been shared at the conference. That's without any of the public relations issues.
    4. Re:The law is the law... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the summary does say that "... said he was blocked from entering the US on the technicality that he had (years ago) signed a contract with Black Hat as an individual, not as his company" which does indicate that the immigration folks had some specific knowledge, as opposed to his being just another illegal alien.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:The law is the law... by SD_92104 · · Score: 1

      [...] It cost me tax money to put him on the next airplane out [...] Not true - if you get sent packing at immigration you will have to pay for your own ticket back - and of course pay the premium because you have to buy a last-minute ticket...
    6. Re:The law is the law... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      When you go through customs. someone usually asks you if your here on business or pleasure. You say business, They ask where and why or what. You explain. They ask if you have any documentation on this, you show them. Now the border agent can look and see you are an outside citizens who signed a contract to do work in the states and don't have a visa.

      In the past, they might have ignored it. Now, with the illegals and everyone wanting them out, they aren't ignoring it. I don't think it is the customs agent, or the US state department saying we got him on a technicality, It is people attempting to report why he won't be at the conference and how stupid of a reason it is.

    7. Re:The law is the law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NATO doesn't work between Germany and USofA.

      USofA is not the country of the freedom, USofA is not the country of the libertyies.

    8. Re:The law is the law... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both of you are wrong. It's the airline that brought him to the country that's responsible for taking him back, and they have to foot the bill.

  4. Technicality? by kcurtis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How is this a technicality? He didn't have a visa to do the work here that he had contracted for.

    1. Re:Technicality? by Lars+T. · · Score: 1

      How is this a technicality? He didn't have a visa to do the work here that he had contracted for. Neither did he have one the other times he did the exact same thing. Now either this is a technicality, or US customs is seriously SNAFU. Hey, he told them what he was going to do, and they waved him through each time until now?
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    2. Re:Technicality? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is this a technicality? He didn't have a visa to do the work here that he had contracted for.

      Because at its very essence the visa wasn't needed--all that was needed was a piece of paper saying that he was working for a company in Germany who was sending him, instead of going over and being "employed" by a company as a trainer in the US.

      This is dictionary definition of technicality. One sentence needed to be worded slightly differently even though both sentence variants meant, in terms of the business relationship, basically the same thing. One variant makes the immigration bureaucracy happy, the other blows a multi-thousand dollar trip.

    3. Re:Technicality? by SnowZero · · Score: 1

      When a hacker finds some flaw and announces it with a zero-day exploit, some want us to call that "security research". So, when an immigration official finds a way to keep a hacker out of the country using existing laws (which apply equally to everyone), shouldn't that just be called "legal research"?

      So, a hacker got owned; I for one think that is pretty funny. Just like a hacker might say to regular programmers, "next time he should be more careful."

    4. Re:Technicality? by belmolis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's a technicality because he wouldn't have needed a visa had the contract been between Blackhat and his company. What determines whether he gets in is whether he signed the contract as an individual or as the CEO of his company.

      What bothers me about this is not so much that they picked up on this rather minor technicality but that the response is extreme and inflexible. Why not let him fix the technical flaw making the contract with his company? The reason they gave was that he couldn't do this because he had already applied as an individual. So what? That may be immigration policy, but its a stupid, inflexible policy. Similarly, it is ridiculous to bar him forever from using the visa waiver program, though they are indeed applying their normal policy to him. The assumption is that any violation of the rules should be treated as evidence that the individual is untrustworthy and should therefore have to go through the full visa application process. That is an obviously unsound assumption - there are plenty of cases like this one in which the violation is trivial and/or unintentional. Exclusion from the visa waiver program should be restricted to serious, intentional violations.

    5. Re:Technicality? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Yeah, ok. I don't think you know the details. You're just speculating.

      If the people in the US were paying his company in Germany for him to present then he is a contractor, working in the US.

      Personally, whenever I go to the US, I stand at the border with no visa and say "yep, I'm here to attend meetings with my employer, catch up, that sort of thing" and they wave me through.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    6. Re:Technicality? by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      What they should've done was offer to buy some stocks in the German company on the international market and then let his company cut him in on a few priveleged options when he returned home. That's the way international players conduct their money-laundering.

      A security researcher should definitely know how to get around such simple rules, don't you think?

      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    7. Re:Technicality? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, ok. I don't think you know the details. You're just speculating.

      What details are you suggesting I missed? Unless he is fibbing in his blog entry (linked in the summary) it had all the information necessary. No need to speculate.

      If the people in the US were paying his company in Germany for him to present then he is a contractor, working in the US.

      Under the Visa Waiver Program, an individual working in such a scenario is not considered "working in the US" until they hit 90 days. "The Visa Waiver Program (VWP) enables nationals of certain countries to travel to the United States for tourism or business for stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa." From here.

    8. Re:Technicality? by AtomicBomb · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. Please send a custom officer to each academic conference to arrest those evil foreign professors who "illegally" delivers workshops in advance of the main conferences. As long as the conference is truly international and world class, the officer can be guaranteed to catch a few Indian, Chinese, Japanese, German or Brits "work illegally without a permit".

      As far as I know nearly every single one of them fills in the entry form as an individual who travels to US to attend a conference/ workshop. People got to realize these foreign professors or experts are doing US favor, rather than skimming the work opportunity of US citizen.

    9. Re:Technicality? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      It's a technicality because he wouldn't have needed a visa had the contract been between Blackhat and his company. What determines whether he gets in is whether he signed the contract as an individual or as the CEO of his company.

      That's actually incorrect. If he is coming under those circumstances he still needs a work visa, but instead of an H1-B it may be an E-1 or similar other classification that doesn't require as stringent an application process.

    10. Re:Technicality? by seriesrover · · Score: 1

      Immigration has shades of grey since its controlled by people who are understaffed. If he came in to work before then he shouldnt have been allowed (assuming the laws at the time needed work authorization for what he did). But I've been through the US immigration process and its full of what if's, who you talk to, arguements you put forward for your case. I hit one big snag at one point and the immigration officer told me that 2 wrongs dont make a right. Hes absolutely right.

    11. Re:Technicality? by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      What details are you suggesting I missed? Unless he is fibbing in his blog entry (linked in the summary) it had all the information necessary. No need to speculate. Exactly. There's two sides to every story. As for fibbing, that's often the first thing people do when confronted by border security. They think if they tell just a little white lie they'll get through the screen process faster. The result is the opposite, should they catch you in that lie.

      "Will you be doing any work in the US?"
      "No."
      "Says here you are presenting at a conference."
      "Uhh, yes, that's right."
      "Are you being paid to present at this conference?"
      "Umm, no."
      "Well the documentation you've given me indicates that you will be.. come with me, Sir."

      "Ok, so you are being paid to present at this conference, why did you lie to me?"

      Things go downhill from there.
      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    12. Re:Technicality? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I am sure that academics traveling to the US generally realize what visa they will need. For example here is a web page provided by Duke Unversity that describes what is needed for visiting professors.

      http://www.internationaloffice.duke.edu/int_visa_c lass.html

      The fact is this guy didn't do his homework, and was was caught up. He screwed up.

    13. Re:Technicality? by belmolis · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but according to his post it isn't Halvar's understanding of the situation.

    14. Re:Technicality? by belmolis · · Score: 1

      Surely just about everybody knows that if you're being paid to give a workshop you are working and probably need a visa that permits you to work. Of course, often presenters at workshops are not paid, or they are given a relatively modest "honorarium" that doesn't count as pay.

    15. Re:Technicality? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Maybe so, but the INS has many resources freely available that describe what is necessary. They are pretty explicit that you cannot legally come to the US and get paid for something you do without getting an appropriate visa type. Tourist visas don't allow someone else to pay you while you are in the US.

    16. Re:Technicality? by mudetroit · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think this is dead on correct. I have been crossing the US-Canada border on a fairly regular basis recently. There are time when the basically ask me where I am from and wave me on my way and other times when I have felt like I was going through something akin to the Spanish Inquisition.

      This in no way means that the times I was given a difficult time that they did anything wrong. It just speaks to the randomness of the immigration process going either direction; because, it has happened going both ways for me.

    17. Re:Technicality? by emmons · · Score: 1

      Actually it's quite a big difference legally. Who is being paid? If it's him, then he is being employed in the United States by an American company. If it's his company, then he is being employed by a German company that is providing services to an American company.

      --
      Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
    18. Re:Technicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither did he have one the other times he did the exact same thing. Now either this is a technicality, or US customs is seriously SNAFU. Hey, he told them what he was going to do, and they waved him through each time until now?

      The fact that you get away with breaking the law most of the time doesn't make it right. Most people are not searched when they arrive in the USA, which makes it very easy to smuggle things.

      Many people exceed the speed limit some of the time, but it's still against the law, and sometimes you get caught.

      US immigration usually has more important things to worry about than an EU citizen working illegally for 2 days, who would be working legally if they applied for the visa they are entitled to get. But it's still illegal, and sometimes you get caught.

    19. Re:Technicality? by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

      There's two sides to every story.

      I actually believe that he told the truth straightforward. The technicality was sufficient to prevent his entry to the US (though, it's probably not enforced regularly.) He doesn't claim that he was treated unfairly (as I recall) just that the technicality is a bit arcane and stupid overall.

    20. Re:Technicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are time when the basically ask me where I am from and wave me on my way and other times when I have felt like I was going through something akin to the Spanish Inquisition.

      Of course there's an element of surprise - nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition!

    21. Re:Technicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make a good point.

    22. Re:Technicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think about it now for a minute... yeah it seems pretty silly and bureaucratic; but the alternatives seem limited to have customs officers overturn policy when they think its okay (he didn't look sick), or, to write a policy that includes every possible scenario. I'll take silly and bureaucratic it works a higher percentage of the time.

    23. Re:Technicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And such a prime example of the intellectual elite such as yourself should definitely know how to get around such petty office politics, don't you think?

    24. Re:Technicality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um yes, I'm sure he wants to end up in Gitmo by lying about the purpose of his visit...

  5. Just move BlackHat off the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's clear that this kind of conference is now impossible to gather in the US, so relocate it in a free country. Why not Mexico, South Am, East Asia, Russia ?

    1. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by hacker · · Score: 1

      Why not Mexico, South Am, East Asia, Russia ?

      Because by the time the next conference happens, the US will have already shut its borders for anyone "suspect" of leaving the country to attend this conference, from attending.

      And do you think they'll let you back into the country?

      "What is the nature of your visit?"

      "I'm speaking at a hacking conference."

      "A what? Turn around and get back on the plane and don't come back."

    2. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by Lally+Singh · · Score: 1

      Frankly, a lot of people wouldn't feel as safe there, nor would the conference seem as legitimate. Justified or not.

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    3. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Completely agree. Choose a free country instead, all computer conferences and talks will eventually be outside the US given it's current removal of freedoms & idiotic immigration system.

    4. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Because America is seen as "safe" (How safe is a country full of firearms and short tempered people..?) where as most of the above have a slight problem with lawlessness and some murder/kidnapping history.

      --
      I like muppets.
    5. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The writing is on the wall, it is going to happen sooner or later. The US has become quite unpredictable, some of their laws or their implementations are orwellian and chaotic. The US used to be leading edge by attracting best of minds all over the world. This attraction has disappeared in the last 5-8 years.

    6. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not Mexico, South Am, East Asia, Russia ?

      Because by the time the next conference happens, the US will have already shut its borders for anyone "suspect" of leaving the country to attend this conference, from attending.

      That may not be the wisest of ideas:

      "The largest part of the attendees of the trainings are US-Government related folks, mostly working on US National Security in some form. I have trained people from the DoD, DoE, DHS and most other agencies that come to mind."
      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    7. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should check the 'liberal' immigration and visa laws in Mexico before you make sweeping statements like that.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    8. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by belmolis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually, this incident doesn't demonstrate any kind of problem with holding conferences in the US. If he had merely planned to attend the conference, he wouldn't have been denied entry. What got him in trouble was his plan to do training for two days prior to the conference, that is, to work in the United States. Granted, he was denied entry on a technicality that he should have been allowed to fix, but what that means is that if you want to work in the US you have to be careful.

    9. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +anything insightful for parent comment is retarded, unless of course it's a recognition of the absolute absurdity of the comment.

      Mexico has some of the most hostile immigration laws in the Americas. They'll let rich tourists in at the drop of a hat, but if you want to do business or live there, good luck. You'll need to stand in line with a fistfull of cash like everyone else.

    10. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by jshackney · · Score: 1

      Yes! Brilliant! How about Cuba, Venezuela, Qatar, China, Kurdistan, etc. ?

    11. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, why not ? Nowadays, you feel more free in these countries than in the US...

    12. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by westlake · · Score: 1
      It's clear that this kind of conference is now impossible to gather in the US, so relocate it in a free country. Why not Mexico, South Am, East Asia, Russia?

      What makes you think that border guards are trained - or inclined - to be less rule-bound and unsympathetic elsewhere? I'll pass on the chance to sweat out the arrival of the American consul at a Nicaraguan lock-up.

    13. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by Eric+in+SF · · Score: 1

      I can't tell where you are from from your /. profile, but we do not have to pass through exit immigration when leaving the USA. My friends from Australia were quite surprised at that.

      I can't speculate as to what circumstances Homeland Security can refuse entry to a returning US citizen, but will admit in this day and age it is a valid concern.

    14. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by xRobx · · Score: 1

      Do you have a comparison to back that up with?

    15. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by dbcooper_nz · · Score: 1

      Yeah! 'Cause presenting is a rather uncommon practice for conference attendees. FFS.

    16. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by belmolis · · Score: 1

      What caused the trouble was not his intention of presenting at the conference. It was his intention of being paid to conduct a training workshop before the conference that caused the trouble. Presenting at the conference by itself would have been fine.

    17. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by MadMidnightBomber · · Score: 1

      Blackhat already has meetings in Europe (Amsterdam?) and Asia (Japan?). http://www.blackhat.com/html/bh-europe-06/bh-eu-06 -index.html

      --
      "It doesn't cost enough, and it makes too much sense."
    18. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by Tom · · Score: 1

      I've given numerous speeches, in several countries. The main part of the work is done by the time you arrive. Actually giving the speech is a fraction of the actual work involved, and certainly does not justify the same formal requirements as if you wanted to spend a year in full-time work
        You can't seriously expect people to spend more time filling out the forms than they will be actually working. That is bureaucracy gone mad, nothing else. Heck they interviewed him a customs for a considerable part of the time he had planned to "work".

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    19. Re:Just move BlackHat off the US! by 1110110001 · · Score: 1

      It's clear that this kind of conference is now impossible to gather in the US, so relocate it in a free country. Why not Mexico, South Am, East Asia, Russia ? I would be fine with Canada. In the past there've been some interesting conferences in the US, but because of the idiotic policies (storing data about me for 15 years, fingerprints, ..) I didn't go there. Same for holiday. Instead of San Francisco or Miami I went to Toronto and Vancouver.
  6. hm. by priestx · · Score: 1, Troll

    Would it be a problem to set-up a video conference to train these people from around the world?

    --
    "To be is to do." -Socrates
    "To do is to be." -Jean-Paul Sartre
    "Do-be-do-be-do." -Frank Sinatra
  7. I don't want to go to the US anymore. by toQDuj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is the reason I don't want to go to the US anymore.

    Now I have to fear that the people here did not do their work properly (i.e. gave me the wrong visa application), and that I'll be rejected at the gates after standing in a huge queue before immigration at the airport.

    The other reason is that after providing the security services with boatloads of personal information, fingerprints and other biometrics, some flag will go up in some obscure system, and I'll be (hopefully) sent back straight away by unnamed guys, and if I'm unlucky, get deported to the happy camp of Guantanamo inc. to have all human rights stripped from me for reasons unknown.

    B.

    --
    Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    1. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It also sounds like the original poster would probably be an Iraq-police-action protestor and likely a terrorist sympathizer too. Probably one of those civil rights long-hairs.

    2. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by huckda · · Score: 1

      Now I have to fear that the people here did not do their work properly (i.e. gave me the wrong visa application) sorry to break it to you...but that is 100% and in ALL ENTIRETY....YOUR responsibility...

      they will provide any visa application YOU ask for...it's your responsibility to ensure you have the proper one.
      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
    3. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The only people in Guantanamo were shooting at Americans after teaching in terrorist training camps. There you go with your pretend version of reality again.
      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    4. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Getting work visas seems to be an issue for Germans. Here is a story about a guy being deported from Thailand for the same reason:

      http://www.thaivisa.com/forum/index.php?showtopic= 130082

      He lucked out getting a suspended sentence on the jail time.

      And here is an article where a Tibetan was deported from Germany when he was trying to attend a conference in Brussels (he was only in transit):

      http://www.phayul.com/news/article.aspx?article=Ge rman+airport+authority+deports+on+baseless+ground+ %3A+Chairman+Karma+Choephel&id=16744&c=1&t=1

      Conclusion: This sort of thing happens all over the world, and you really need someone experienced to set up your papers.

    5. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by griffjon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hell I live here and I don't feel all that comfortable. And the gov't has my passport for renewal with no liklihood it'll get back to me any time soon.

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    6. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of you Americans need to get over yourselves.

      As for the issue here, they are just doing what small minded individuals in positions of authority do best. Petty harassment of legitimate people to make it look like they are all doing their jobs.

      They did the exact same thing to the maintainer of the Linux 2.4 kernel at the time (Marcello Tosatti), who was there to attend a kernel summit. That's indeed twisting a technicality based on the type of visa that he had. Subsequent kernel summits were held in Canada.

    7. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by damista · · Score: 1

      No, the people in Guantanamo are those who dared to shoot at Americans after they invaded their country...and some more who were just at the wrong place at the wrong time. The really big fish aren't there and your government isn't even interested in getting the really big fish. If Osama (who was trained by the CIA I may add) was gone, who would your government use as a boogeyman to justify taking away more and more of your freedom? Samuel Goldstein?

      I must say, I am really disappointed. I always though that people who post on /. are the ones who haven't been completely brainwashed by the media. I thought people here know how to use their brains and look at the facts to form their own oppinion. Obviously I was mistaken. There are just as many mindless zombies, who believe everything the media throws at them, in here as in any other internet forum.

    8. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry to break it to you...but being "my responsibility" affects 0% ZILCH NONE whether I'm keen to visiting places where I'm likely to get fucked over for whatever reason.

      What is it with people mistaking "right, the good thing" with "right, by the book" all the time here. Aspergers?

    9. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know how you feel. I recently had to go to the US and had to fill this stupid green form saying that I wasn't going to do anything nasty. The US is safe now, the bad guys will no doubt be catched with this faultproof system.

    10. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So essentially anybody with pro-American sentiments are just brainwashed sheep?

    11. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by db32 · · Score: 1

      Just to play devils advocate...exactly where did you get the evidence that the people being held are indeed innocent folks? I mean...I can only assume it is the same media outlets that you decry the unthinking morons for listening to...well okay maybe not quite the same...obviously the spin factor is obviously moving in the opposite directions for your sources, but since it agrees with your preconceived notions of the situation you do not view it as spin...and it is obviously the truth (not so far from the people you decry for saying the opposite). That having been said I suspect that the truth is actually somewhere in the middle...that the people locked up probably were indeed doing things that they should not have been doing...that does not however make them the terrorist masterminds the government makes them out to be, probably about the equal of the common street thug type. This of course does not justify torture (not that anything really does since it has been proven time and time again that torture is not valid for intelligence gathering, unless the US government is willing to claim that the testimony from the nurses that were raped and beaten into saying they intentionally infected children with HIV).

      Thankfully for the government there is no shortage of folks so willing to cry and scream foul with rather inflated claims. That way they can take the extreme detractors, prove them wrong, and the people on the fence fall right in line with the government. Sheehan, Moore, these two are probably the freaking heroes of the current administration...they are the poster children for how moronic their detractors are...why do you think they get so much coverage? The truth gets drowned out in the noise and the criminals benefit.

      That having been said...Bush isn't exactly responsible for our mess here...Republican and Democrat alike have been fucking about in other governments business, playing them against eachother, mucking with their internal operations, and so on for so long it is no surprise that we have these problems now. America gets to play hero and wave the flag about how they liberated the Iraqi people from Saddam...too bad the Iraqi's remember that it was the US that propped up that asshole in the first place. It was clearly demonstrated that the American people don't need a singular boogeyman after the whole binladen/saddam/saddam/binladen/binladen/saddam SWITCH! gotcha was performed and everyone believed that Saddam was responsible for 9/11. They just need to be spooked by a scary word like "terrorist" and "islamofacist" and the herd mentality kicks in.

      What a wonderful system...Kevin Mitnik 5 years no trial...denied review of evidence...can't use a phone for his leet missile launching whistlin skills...child molestor that speaks a rare foreign language...let off the hook because the case had gone for 3 years and they couldn't find a translator because of various problems (like the first translator running out of the room in tears because she couldn't handle the details of the case), nevermind the piece of shit was here attending school IN ENGLISH. So there is no shortage of irrational fear to be had, we need no boogeymen.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    12. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 0, Troll

      Osama (who was trained by the CIA I may add)

      No, he was not. Osama had his own money, lots of it in fact, and had no need for the CIA. In fact, he hated the CIA, and America, every bit then as he does now. Just the very thought of "infidels" being in what he considers "muslim holy land" (pretty much the whole middle east) was offensive to him. Contrary to popular belief, the US had nothing to do with the mujahideen (however its spelled) and never gave them anything. The CIA was indeed involved with some other factions in Afghanistan (in fact, many of the same ones that we are on friendly terms with now,) but then just as much as now, Osama and his group have always been enemies of the US.

      What you are saying here is one of those urban myths, which no matter how hard you try to dispel them, never go away. Also contrary to popular belief, the radical muslims who hate us do so entirely because of their religious beliefs. They have had a deep enmity towards the west, and Christianity in particular, since days long before the US was even around. "Stealing oil" or "invading their homeland" really has nothing to do with it, and if you think it does then you are a moron, in fact this is exactly what reformed radicals have said on numerous occasions, and said they laughed every time they heard somebody in the media claim this because it always played in their favor even though it wasn't true.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    13. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by gonzo67 · · Score: 1

      Actually, Osama and Al Qaida were formed during the soviet invasion of Afghanistan as part of the Islamic concept of mutual protection between Muslims. As the soviets were the enemy of the US at the time, we funded and supported materially those grups opposing the USSR forces. This included Al Qaida and by extension, Osama as its leader.

      My sources are not the news media but the US government agencies involved during that period.

    14. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have not been proven guilty in a fair trial and are therefore innocent. It's really that easy.

    15. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by damista · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I certainly didn't mean to say the people in Guantanamo are all innocent. But they aren't all terrorists either. What happened is that ALL people fighting in Afganistan were thrown into one big pot, regardless of who they were and what they were doing.

      One may think of the Taliban what they like but they are NOT Al Quaida. People who were fighting with the Taliban to defend their country were sent to Guantanamo as "enemy combatants" and "very dangerous people". Why? Because Al Quaida fighters have been fighting with the Taliban and the US government hast deemed all of the Taliban fighters as "fighting with Al Quaida and by doing so supporting terrorists".

      This has been repeated over and over again until Taliban and Al Quaida have become almost interchangeable. This is simply not true.

      If the US government claims that everybody in Guantanamo is a terrorist, they are simply lying. They know that it is a lie but they also know that repeating a lie often enough sooner or later makes it the "truth". I wouldn't even go as far as calling all Al Quaida fighters terrorists. Many, if not most of them undoubtedly are but just because they were trained to be terrorists doesn't mean they will actually become any. Not everybody who knows how to hotwire a car is a car thief.

      Take David Hicks for example. He was fighting for the Taliban in Afganistan, was captured and sent to Guantanamo. After five years he was released after he had admitted to "supporting a terrorist organisation"...because there were also some Al Quaida fighters fighting with the Taliban. His admission was a win/win situation. For him it was a win, because he got out of Guantanamo and could go home to Australia and the US government suddenly had justification to hold him in Guantanamo to start with. Is this how it should be? I don't think so.

      So no, not everybody in Guantanamo is innocent but not everybody is guilty either unless you see defending your country against a foreign aggressor as something to be guilty of. And the ones who really are guilty of some wrong doings, still deserve a proper trial infront of a proper court. But why are they not tried yet? Because they first have to find something they can try them for?

    16. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1
      http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/asiapcf/08/15/bergen .answers/index.html

      If it's true that bin Laden once worked for the CIA, what makes you so sure that he isn't still?
      Anne Busigin, Toronto, Canada

      BERGEN: This is one of those things where you cannot put it out of its misery.

      The story about bin Laden and the CIA -- that the CIA funded bin Laden or trained bin Laden -- is simply a folk myth. There's no evidence of this. In fact, there are very few things that bin Laden, Ayman al-Zawahiri and the U.S. government agree on. They all agree that they didn't have a relationship in the 1980s. And they wouldn't have needed to. Bin Laden had his own money, he was anti-American and he was operating secretly and independently.

      The real story here is the CIA didn't really have a clue about who this guy was until 1996 when they set up a unit to really start tracking him.


      http://books.google.com/books?id=sRhZDrJb0zgC&pg=P A66&lpg=PA66&dq=%22&source=web&ots=Oy-AwMmNFl&sig= YegrfhRq_oFzsFKVBXxME597bfw#PPA66,M1

      It was, however, a cardinal rule of Pakistan's policy that no Americans ever become involved with the distribution of funds or arms once they arrived in the country. No Americans ever trained or had direct contact with the mujahideen, and no American official ever went inside Afghanistan

      ...

      In short, the CIA had very limited dealings with the Afghans, let alone with the Afghan Arabs. And for good reason, there was simply no point in the CIA and the Afghan Arabs being in contact with each other. The Agency worked through ISI during the Afghan war, while the Afghan Arabs functioned independently and had their own sources of funding. The CIA did not need the Afghan Arabs, and the Afghan Arabs did not need the CIA. So the notion that the Agency funded and trained the Afghan Arabs is, at best, misleading.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    17. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by db32 · · Score: 1

      I think you are taking the "foreign aggressor" thing a bit to far in the case of the Taliban. There is quite a bit of local support for the US in Afghanistan. Afghanistan was an ENTIRELY different situation than Iraq. Afghanistan wound up the way it did because of the whole US vs Soviets thing...the Soviets tried to move in and murder everyone...the US showed up and armed and trained the populace to kill soviets. The unfortunate side effect is a bunch of sick and twisted bastards got a bunch of guns and training and after the Soviets left because they were getting slaughtered, and the US left because "we were never here"...these armed thugs took over and formed the Taliban and now that they had power were able to enforce their rule of terror. So terrorist organization or not, the Taliban and its supporters were an organization of sick power hungry bastards and folks like Mr Innocent David Hicks shoulda been pushed out of the $500,000 chartered aircraft as it flew him home. Even when you do count the fact that some of those people were probably defending their homes (which is not the same as defending terrorists or the Taliban), and were probably scared out of their minds in the middle of the night...I know whether I was the target or not I would probably grab my gun and start shooting at anything unfamiliar if I was woken up like that. But Mr Innocent there...what the hell was he doing there...it sure as shit wasn't his home now was it...given that he is being sent back to australia. So no...that clown is about the last person on the list to be pointed at as an innocent bystander. He was there looking for a fight and he got what was coming to him. Ackhmed who got woken up in the middle of the night by a night raid and grabbed his gun and shot at the unfamiliar faces...HE is the potentially innocent one.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    18. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by db32 · · Score: 1

      No...they are 'presumed' innocent...which is a far cry from being innocent. You can arrest a murderer or rapist and leave them locked up awaiting trial. Granted the military tribunal nonsense that Shrub King wants is garbage. Innocent until proven guilty is not the same thing as everyone seems to thing...or we would have rapists and murderers running about in the streets waiting for trials...and that is most certainly is not how it works or is meant to work.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    19. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by damista · · Score: 1

      As I said, you can think of the Taliban whatever you like but they are not terrorists and that's what it's all about. I'm not here to defend the Taliban. On the contrary, I think pretty much the same way about them as you do.

      As for Hicks, I have no idea what possessed him to "join" the Taliban (there are some sources who say he had nothing to do with them at all...I don't know, I wasn't there), but he is no terrorist and neither the US nor anybody else had the right to hold him 5 years in a prison with no rights whatsoever without charging, let alone trying him.

      My comments were simply based on the OPs statement that everybody in Guantanamo had been teaching in a terror camp and shot at Americans. Not everybody who ended up in Guantanamo had something to do with Al Quaida and its terror camps and I'd say the Taliban had every right to fight back when they were attacked. I would have done it, you would have done it and everybody else would have done it as well. I'm not sad to see them gone but did the west have the right to invade the country just because their ways greatly differ from our values? While I enjoy our western ways and values, what makes us think they're the beesnees? who gives us the right to tell others how to do things? If we were to attack every country whose ways we dislike and disrespect, we'd have a lot to. But some are too powerful to be attacked, others have powerful friends and again others, we're doing great business with. Do we have a right to attack a country because they don't hand over somebody we want to get our hands on? If so, there are several CIA agents who are sought in Germany for kidnapping a German citizen and taking him to several secret CIA prisons in "torture friendly" countries and the US refuse to hand them over to German authorities. Does that mean Germany has the right to attack the US?

      Afganistan has fallen into the same chaos as it was in after the Soviet invasion, the poppy production is the highest in decades, just crossing the road is an adventure and the number of civilian casualties is skyhigh. Osama is still at large and the whole thing just played into the hands of radical islamists. Since Afganistan and Iraq, the number of those willing to participate in terrorist activities has skyrocketed and Al Quaida is now stronger than they have been in a long time. Are you surprised?

      As much as people dislike the thought but ultimately, the US are responsible for the rise of the Taliban, Osama and Al Quaida...all out of fear of Afganistan becoming a communist country, which in the long run would have been the lesser evil.

    20. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by vr · · Score: 1

      This is the reason I don't want to go to the US anymore.
      But it's a great place to go on vacation... The dollar is down, go now! :)

    21. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by jrumney · · Score: 1

      sorry to break it to you...but that is 100% and in ALL ENTIRETY....YOUR responsibility...

      Yet another reason to avoid visiting the US. Seriously, I've been to about 30 countries around the world. Most of them are friendly and helpful when it comes to helping you get the documentation right, Singapore even let me in once when they shouldn't have, and they haven't hassled me on subsequent visits, so they don't seem to have taken it down to be used against me in future either (something that has happened to friends of mine on visits to the US). Only the US has this "100% YOUR responsibility" attitude.

    22. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      The only people in Guantanamo were shooting at Americans after teaching in terrorist training camps

      How do you know? It's not like there's a list of the prisoners there that any of us can just look up.

    23. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by db32 · · Score: 1

      King George is the fucking poster child for terrorist recruitment, so no I'm not surprised, this mess has been handled in just about the worst possible way short of nukularing everyone. Which by the way he tried early on when he was pressing for research for smaller tactical nukes that he could use easier. However, the Taliban is not simply a case of they do things we don't like. Unlike Iraq they were sponsoring terrorism, saying they are not terrorist means that the US is not guilty of a whole list of crimes that we paid other people to do for us. The issue with Germany isn't anywhere near on the same level...we can send diplomats to eachothers countries and let them argue it out... Not exactly possible with Taliban folks...you send a diplomat and you are likely to find a video of him on the internet getting his head lopped with guys screaming allallalalalala. Not that I condone any of our moron soldiers have done, trust me, it pisses me the hell off that those retards managed to make the entire US military look like psychotic torturers, hell I think we should strip em of their uniforms and drop em in the center of Iraqi towns and see if they are so willing to be pricks then, but quite frankly...I would rather be stacked up in a naked man pyramid than to go through a fraction of what the people we are fighting do to those they capture. Just because we are wrong on a great number of ways we have handled this, does not make them any less psychotic and deserving of being blasted.

      I think our greatest failure in Afghanistan is ol King George pulling the switcheroo so he could justify invading Iraq and getting us drug into the middle of a civil war, while refusing to acknowledge that, and surging troops and otherwise stretching the military to its breaking point by having absolutely nothing that resembles a plan other than "Well, uh, I'm gunna shoot em some more!" Afghanistan has basically been forgotten, and all the resources that should be going there to finish the job correctly have been redirected to Iraq.

      --
      The only change I can believe in is what I find in my couch cushions.
    24. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      You know what's funny? I've been to the US and to China.... Guess which one was easier to get into? By a long shot China, and for that one I had to apply for a visa in their embassy. Makes you think, doesn't it?

    25. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but which one was easier to get out of?

    26. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      That was about the same... As simple as getting on the plane. Why?

    27. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by vidarh · · Score: 1
      I have to agree. I went to Beijing earlier this year. The visa was trivial to get, and immigration at Beijing International airport was a lot smoother to get through than what it usually is when I go to the US. In the US there's always lots of questions, finger printing, having my picture taken etc. In Beijing they just looked briefly at my passport and waved me through.

      That, and their landing card doesn't have the list of ridiculous questions on it (sure, if I had committed genocide recently, I most certainly would tick the "yes" box...), though maybe that's a minus - the US visa vaiwer forms does have a certain comic value.

    28. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Ah, but which one was easier to get out of?

      Until a few months ago, clearly China, since I didn't there have to again have my passport scanned, and my picture taken while some annoying officer of some agency insists on helping thus slowing everything down.

      At least now they've scrapped those stupid booths.

    29. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      In Beijing they just looked briefly at my passport and waved me through.



      They probably know that you aren't going to work for lower wages than a Chinese citizen.



      (sure, if I had committed genocide recently, I most certainly would tick the "yes" box...),



      They don't expect you to answer these questions honestly in case you would have to answer "yes". The purpose of this form is merely that they can slap you with another charge (making a false statement on the form) if you're put on trial for anything at all while in the States, thereby guaranteeing that you'll land in prison.

    30. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      They probably know that you aren't going to work for lower wages than a Chinese citizen.

      Yes, but entering in the US you are pretty much treated as a criminal. Fingerprinting, photographing, etc.... Not so in China.

      They don't expect you to answer these questions honestly in case you would have to answer "yes".

      Oh, I know what it is for, that's not the point. If I did commit genocide, that would be more than enough to put me in prison, so it doesn't make a difference. Life long sentence for genocide, plus 2 years for making a false statement on a form. Laughable!

      You're pretty much the laughing stock of the world with those ridiculous forms.

    31. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by the+not-troll · · Score: 1

      I'm going a step further: Living in continental Europe, I don't even want to travel to any country which isn't a member of the Schengen Agreement. I've got a right to travel whereever I want. If one doesn't admit that, but rather wants me to get a visa and prove that I'm no terrorist (proving a negative is somewhat difficult, anyway) etc., I don't want to visit. For if you can't even enter and leave freely, you ain't got that much freedom inside, either, as was impressively demonstrated by the iron curtain during the cold war.

      And really, who has more to lose? Me? Definitely not. Guantanamo, indeed, is nothing anyone would regret not having visited (though, unfortunately, the CIA can pick you up whereever you are in the world; but you needn't make it easy for them). The US, however, completely relies on foreign work: Latin Americans do do the physical work not already outsourced to China, because the USians don't want to pay USians to do it; Chinese and Europeans to do the intellectual work USians can't do because their education system is the crappiest in the world.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, government controls corporations.
      In Capitalist America, corporations control government.
    32. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Incompetency. Have a read of the Peter Principal. It'll change your outlook on life.

    33. Re:I don't want to go to the US anymore. by huckda · · Score: 1

      maybe cuz some many want to come here and stay illegally.

      --
      "Just Smile and Nod." --Huck
  8. Boo Fucking Hoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What a sensationalist article title. It's not a technicality at all, he would have been doing the training illegally. He may be a good hacker, but he certainly sucks at following proper procedure.

    Cry me a river.

    1. Re:Boo Fucking Hoo. by toQDuj · · Score: 1

      What about the people that informed him which application to fill out? I mean, it's not common knowledge that for presenting a workshop at a conference you have to fill in visa application 157-12399-b. Oh, he's from Germany and earns more than 25k per year? then it's 157-12399-b'

      B.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    2. Re:Boo Fucking Hoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the people that informed him which application to fill out? I mean, it's not common knowledge that for presenting a workshop at a conference you have to fill in visa application 157-12399-b. Oh, he's from Germany and earns more than 25k per year? then it's 157-12399-b'

      He is being treated like anyone else. A few years back, I was flying to Boston from Canada to attend the Materials Research Society conference, where I would be giving an invited talk.

      US Customs & Immigration asked me where I was from, where I was going, and what would I be doing there. I answered truthfully. They then asked me how much I was being paid to give my presentation. I laughed and truthfully said "Nothing. I have to pay to attend the conference."

      They said, "Enjoy your stay", and that was it.

      Despite being a white Canadian citizen, born in Canada, I am not entitled to work in the USA without the appropriate visa, even though engineers are covered by the North American Free Trade Agreement, and can get a TN visa at will. To get a TN visa you need to show that you are a citizen, that you have a job offer for one of the professions covered under NAFTA, and that you are a member of that profession. Very easy, no waiting, but you still have to get the visa.

      It may come as a surprise for EU citizens who are used to travelling & working throughout the EU without a visa, let alone a passport, that there are formalities go though. Not that long ago, you needed all these things in the EU.

      Now, it's much easier to claim a big conspiracy theory...

    3. Re:Boo Fucking Hoo. by seriesrover · · Score: 1

      First of its not obscure at all. Its an H1-B work visa - if anyone decided to *any* cursory check its all over the fucking place. Its very common knowledge and its ultimately his responsibility there. Just about every other country has similar sorts of work permits. Theres this thing, its called the internet. The information is readily at hand. If he got a work permit he'd be fine. And as the blurb says, he was contracted to do some work at\before the conference so hes not just there as an attendee.

    4. Re:Boo Fucking Hoo. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he is eligible to do visiting business in USA according to visa waiver program. there's no need for h1b's and such.
      read the content of visa vaiwer program and then say what happened.

  9. Some guy didn't have the right visa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who gives a shit?

  10. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Don't shop there. Convince others to do the same. I mean by this logic, every store that opens its doors in the states must flourish and last forever. Sadly that isn't the truth. Walmart prevails because people whine and bitch and shop there anyways.

    Either don't shop there, or change labour laws to include more reasonable minimum wages for adults, language requirements, etc...

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  11. Why would an international conference be in the US by Rix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They've made it quite clear that they don't like "furriners", so why are people still pressing the issue? Canada is a free and open society, and just to the north. We have lots of conference space in environments much more conducive to rational thought.

  12. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by garcia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The ignorance level when it comes to illegal aliens is amazing. Being upset about illegal aliens is one thing but the blatant racism is not only unnecessary but it just makes you look like a fucking retard.

    Next time, drop the rhetoric that has been so popular against homosexuals and illegal aliens recently and instead talk about it in civil terms.

    Thanks.

  13. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Secrity · · Score: 1

    It is not OK if they are illegal -- and you or I have no idea whether they are illegal or not.

    Even if they are illegal, they pay taxes because it is withheld from their pay checks. Illegals tend to overpay payroll taxes because although they pay withholding they don't get refunds; they also get social security and Medicare withheld from their wages.

    They would be no more unlikely to pay their hospital bills than any other Wal-Mart employee.

  14. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    I am sure they pay taxes, either directly or indirectly. How do you buy gas, rent an apartment, or anything else in the US without getting taxes involved? The answer is that you can't. And the sad thing is some of these taxes like SS and Medicare will be for benefits that are never be traceable back to the person who paid for them.

  15. Simple by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    just sneak across the Mexico-US border. That's how everyone else gets in. Planes and paperwork? Pfffft, old school.

    1. Re:Simple by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or just lie and say it's free. Honestly, if you're only gonna be there a few days it probably won't hurt the economy ANY to just lie. Of course don't get caught :-)

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Or just lie and say it's free. Honestly, if you're only gonna be there a few days it probably won't hurt the economy ANY to just lie. Of course don't get caught :-)

      There is an offence called lying to US immigration. If you are caught lying, the agent has the authority to ban you from the USA for five years, with no judge, jury, or appeal.

      I strongly recommend not lying to US immigration.

    3. Re:Simple by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      It helps if you travel a lot already. Hell, when I drive to the states [for pleasure] I tell them I'm on a "skeeball run" which sadly enough is the actual truth [Watertown, NY has a mall called "Salmon Run" which has a decent arcade]. They stopped asking after the fifth or so trip. Now they just glance in the car and wave me on :-)

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    4. Re:Simple by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      just sneak across the Mexico-US border. That's how everyone else gets in. Planes and paperwork? Pfffft, old school.

      You expect this guy to hack the border control system? Who do you think he is? ... oh, wait.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:Simple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After this online confession you can expect your treatment to change in the near future. They're not going to like it one bit when it's brought to their attention that you have advised people to lie to US Customs when entering the United States.

  16. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by tomstdenis · · Score: 1, Troll

    Yeah, except you can't take paid speaking engagements up here without a work visa either.

    He wasn't denied because the session was on security, he was denied because he's NOT ALLOWED TO WORK THERE without proper approval.

    He would have been deported from Canada for the exact same reason had he told them the same story. In fact, if he wasn't a member of the EU he would have also been deported from Ireland, the UK, Spain, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, etc, etc, etc....

    So while Canada is cool and all [hey I live in Ottawa], it's not a safe haven for illegal aliens either. They have to file fraudulent "refugee" claims like the rest of the population of Toronto.

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  17. Not A Good Sign by Effugas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Halvar's been kicked out of the US?

    This is not good. It's my understanding that once you've been kicked out, it's much, much, much harder to get back in.

    That leaves me rather scared. I've known Halvar for almost six years; we were in Singapore together at Black Hat Asia. He's a very intelligent engineer, doing very good research, and has done more than almost anyone to make people realize that obfuscation is not security. We, as an industry, need his voice. (A bit cynical, but seriously, we as an American industry want his talents put to work here, rather than overseas.)

    Simple arguments like -- nobody could figure out how this works, they'd have to be able to read code -- have been destroyed because of Halvar's work. You may not realize it, but without concrete examples of attacks, software developers simply cannot comprehend attacks against their code that they can't do themselves. Halvar is a critical innoculation against technically inept but vaguely plausable excuses why something must be impossible.

    Halvar does the impossible regularly. Seriously, he's an artist, and the American security industry is directly harmed by not being able to learn from him. What's the story going to be? That Halvar can only do training in India, and China, and in Europe? Yes, that sounds like a wonderful idea. Everyone else's code gets more secure while ours rots on the vine.

    The only thing more embarrassing than this was when Xioyun Wang, the Chinese professor who cracked MD5, was denied entry to the US. Oh well, Halvar, I guess you're in good company...

    --Dan Kaminsky

    1. Re:Not A Good Sign by Iron+Condor · · Score: 4, Funny

      [...] What's the story going to be? That Halvar can only do training in India, and China, and in Europe? Yes, that sounds like a wonderful idea. Everyone else's code gets more secure while ours rots on the vine.[...]

      Given that all US software development will be outsourced to India and China anyways, it makes sese to give these folks an advantage in learning about software security.

      --
      We're all born with nothing.
      If you die in debt, you're ahead.
    2. Re:Not A Good Sign by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      As an American who cares about computer security, I'm sorry this happened. As a workaround, why can't these trainings be done virtually? There's no need for a visa for bits to enter the country, and we're all computer engineers, we can follow presentations and screencasts as easily on our screens as on his. To heck with plane travel. It's bad for the climate anyway.

    3. Re:Not A Good Sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If he's so frickin' smart why can't he fill out a visa form correctly.

      Maybe the immigration guys just found an exploitable hole in his ingress vector.

      Zero day for him.

    4. Re:Not A Good Sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You may not realize it, but without concrete examples of attacks, software developers simply cannot comprehend attacks against their code that they can't do themselves" - by Effugas (2378) * on Sunday July 29, @05:33PM (#20034921)/--Dan Kaminsky

      I'm with you, 110% on your statement in fact... a damn shame! People like he, & Joanna Rutkowska (another foreigner (Polish, like myself (but, I am a U.S. Citizen by birth/native))) have made a big difference lately in the world of computer security, & 'cutting them out'? NOT GOOD BUSINESS!

      (I.E.-> I'd rather have folks like they BOTH contributing to the "general good", rather than the "general bad" & turning their talents to the 'dark side of the force', if you catch my drift!)

      As far as apps getting better, on ANY front (not just bugs, but useability & features)? You are 110% correct... it's tough to spot diff. or better ways for any app YOU CREATED, by yourself, w/OUT user feedback (of ANY kind, on any issues)...

      I built THIS app, with a TON of user-feedback during its 1997-2004 lifecycle of development (with users from 4 forums over time as testers), & the folks that helped me?

      Man... THEY did a GREAT job (but, it's TOUGH taking critiques @ times too, but in the end, worth it (the ends justify the means)):

      http://www.techpowerup.com/downloads/389/foowhatev ermakesgooglehappy.html

      I could NOT have done that app (@ the present stage it is at, but I have not built more onto its actual CODE since 2004 really) WITHOUT folks telling me what they DID NOT LIKE (rather than what they liked, & I told them "Your criticisms are worth a TON of praise, so beat it up, & get back to me" etc. et al)...

      APK

    5. Re:Not A Good Sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The only thing more embarrassing than this was when Xioyun Wang, the Chinese professor who cracked MD5, was denied entry to the US.

      No, I'm pretty sure it's worse when you let them in, then throw them in jail (cf. Dmitry Skylarov).

    6. Re:Not A Good Sign by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Halvar's been kicked out of the US?

      Denied entry for not having a visa is not the same as being kicked out.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    7. Re:Not A Good Sign by jrumney · · Score: 1

      This is not good. It's my understanding that once you've been kicked out, it's much, much, much harder to get back in.

      Being refused entry is not the same as being deported. If he was deported, he basically wouldn't be able to come back for some number of years. Having been refused entry under the Visa Waiver program, he'll now have to apply for a visa in advance for every trip (even as a tourist), the Visa Waiver program no longer applies to him.

      A friend of mine had this happen to her because of bad record keeping. When she turned up at the border last year, they started asking her about a trip she made 12 years ago. It turned out they had combined two trips she'd made 9 months apart into one trip in their database, and accused her of overstaying. Since this was 12 years ago, she didn't have the relevant passport with her to prove that their records were wrong, and ended up paying a one-off $80 fine to allow her in that one time (effectively admitting the offense) and was told she'd have to apply for visas for future visits.

  18. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by abradsn · · Score: 1

    Maybe you missed something here? It didn't look like racist comments here. I live in Washington state. We have a lot of migrant workers. It's a fair assumption that the Mexicans that you see around where I live are illegal immigrants.

    You can argue that is a sad state of affairs or any number of other things, but racist it is not.

  19. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even if they are illegal, they pay taxes because it is withheld from their pay checks.

    OK, how would an illegal worker get a SSN? How do you report taxing an employee who has no SSN?

  20. What a sad state of affairs... by LLKrisJ · · Score: 1

    Maybe (definitely) a bit off topic, but reading this stuff just pisses me off a bit... What did the US ever achieve with all of its draconian checks and procedures in airports and all of their visa crap? Other than (borderline) infringing on the privacy of many innocent individuals it will never be able to stop the most determined people with bad intentions (or desperate Mexican or other immigrants at that). It is deeply disturbing that the USA hands out billions to Israel for military purposes whilst on the other hand supplying Egypt, Saudi Arabia and God knows who else with weapons. What are they expecting? Arming to groups of people who have had beef for ages to the teeth and then expecting everybody to play nice? They are just creating their own (and everybody elses) problems. No measure of retina scans, fingerprinting and other niceties will ever be able to avert the inevitable consequences their foreign policy will have.

  21. Look at the big picture, Tom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Tom, you appear to need further context to understand the original poster's statement.

    The current administration of the United States has made "fighting terrorism" their top priority. As I imagine you are well aware, they have started two major armed conflicts in Afghanistan and Iraq as part of their so-called "War on Terror". Domestically, there was the PATRIOT Act, the No Fly list, the hassling of innocent photographers, and a wide spectrum of other activities performed in the name of "defending the Homeland".

    However, at the very same time we have many of the same members of the administration pushing for lax immigration laws. Some even support amnesty for illegal workers from countries like Mexico, Vietnam, and Guatemala. Some of the proposals we've heard of so far make no mention of screening these aliens who are already in the United States.

    So in this case, we have a highly-educated and very legitimate individual wishing to share his advanced security knowledge with a number of Americans. Yet he endures nothing but hassle and expense from the American officials. On the other hand, the same people crying about there not being enough security in America turn around and want to legitimize currently-illegal workers from third-world countries. Mind you, many of these workers are highly uneducated, often criminal, and usually able to do little more than work as a janitor.

    To any normal person, it seems stupid that a country with such a fixation on security would turn away a security expert for such a minor reason, while at the same time wanting to legitimize the status of the millions of illegal aliens who are probably far more of a security risk.

    1. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

      If he just forfeited his pay it would have been fine.

      And yes, I agree that foreign workers are screwed over. Consider this, Cannucks have to go through the same shit that other foreigners have to work in the states.

      but ... I can drive to the states in 40 minutes. Hell that's shorter than some folks commutes!!! Cannucks [and yankees] should be able to work in opposite countries with much less hassle. Granted there are TN-1s but that's only for temp work [they're not supposed to be renewed].

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by HomelessInLaJolla · · Score: 1

      Yet he endures nothing but hassle and expense from the American officials Such conspiracy theory. This doesn't sound like anyone else I know...

      You're just making up excuses to blame someone else for his failures.

      Mind you, many of these workers are highly uneducated, often criminal, and usually able to do little more than work as a janitor. I'm highly uneducated, non-criminal, and I still can't get a job... even as a janitor (not that I would want to take it away from those who are much more qualified to be one).
      --
      the NPG electrode was replaced with carbon blac
    3. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by HitekHobo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its really simple. There are laws that you have to take into consideration before you enter another country. It is your job to know those laws or risk having your travel plans ruined. I don't carry handguns into Canada. I make sure to fill out the paperwork to carry a long gun to Canada. I get to enter Canada!

      This guy just didn't know the rules and a customs agent enforced the laws. He is just doing his job. In my mind, the real news event here is that a Blackhat speaker is causing a big stink on the internet because he wasn't allowed to break the law.

      If he was really wearing his 'black hat', a little social engineering would've got him into the country without a second thought.

    4. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by multisync · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Cannucks have to go through the same shit

      Cannucks [and yankees] should be able to work in opposite countries


      And, from your earlier post:

      the only EU country I know of that lets Cannucks work there [without a visa] is France


      It's Canucks, damn it! One "n."

      Turn in your maple syrup.
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    5. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by tomstdenis · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually since "Cannuck" isn't a real word you can spell it however you damn well please. And in fact, I've seen both. Granted canuck is the more popular way to spell it, the point is it doesn't matter.

      And anyways, as a fellow canuck [just assuming] you should have apologized for me misspelling the word. That is, afterall, the Canadian way.

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    6. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      we have a highly-educated and very legitimate individual wishing to share his advanced security knowledge with a number of Americans.... ...On the other hand, the same people crying about there not being enough security in America turn around and want to legitimize currently-illegal workers from third-world countries.


      So you're only starting to notice the contradictions? Here are some I've noticed recently:

      Some States you are not required to wear a motorcycle helmet, but it is Federal Law that you must wear eye protection on a sunbed.
      Policing cheerleader moves for being too 'raunchy' then going to Hooters restaurant after the competition then watching a couple of girls gone wild DVDs.
      A democratic system not being allowed to vote on whether a date should be set for withdrawal of US troops from Iraq.
      Dallas Love Field Wright Amendment blocking air transport beyond neighboring states somehow promotes competition.

      I am not at all surprised that a security expert is denied access to the USA because he was going to educate a Country that is trying to be as secure as it can.
    7. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

      Actually since "Cannuck" isn't a real word you can spell it however you damn well please. And in fact, I've seen both. Granted canuck is the more popular way to spell it, the point is it doesn't matter. Proper nouns are real words. See http://canucks.nhl.com/

    8. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by vic-traill · · Score: 1

      Actually since "Cannuck" isn't a real word you can spell it however you damn well please ...

      From the OED online:

      Canuck

      colloq.

      A. n.

      1. A Canadian; spec. a French Canadian.
      2. A Canadian horse or pony.
      3. The French-Canadian patois.
      B. adj. Of or pertaining to Canada or its inhabitants.

      No entry for 'Cannuck'. The OED and I have never seen your spelling.

      So, what the hell is a 'real word' anyway?

      --
      [17] Leary, T., White, C., Wood, P. R., Bhabha, W. D., and Wirth, N. Lambda calculus considered harmful. In Proceedings
    9. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Thank you. :)

    10. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by arivanov · · Score: 1

      This combined with the fact that the guy is in need of a serious cluebat. He agreed to produce material that may damage somebody's else system under his own name as a sole trader. From a legal perspective this actually means full and sole reponsibility for any use or misuse of such material (and no, EULAs or licenses do not work here, any selfrespecting corporation legal staff will do with voiding an EULA in minutes).

      Anyone out there who feels pissed off enough can go and sue him out of his house and all of his belongings even under German law (AFAIK, only anglosaxon nations have the "tools of trade" liability limitation, rest of the world does not, everything you have is a fair game for the bailif). If he had a clue he should have operated all of his security related business as a limited company. If sued, he would have been at most responsible to the value of his declared capital and that would have been it.

      Yet another person in desperate need of a thick cluebat. Nothing to see here. Move along.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    11. Re:Look at the big picture, Tom! by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      > The current administration of the United States has made "fighting terrorism" their top priority.

      The current administration of the United States has made "fighting terrorism" their only priority.

      Fixed that for you. :-)

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
  22. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Canada's huge on handing out working visas. Maybe you should have read the article, or perhaps the summary, or a few of the comments before swimming straight out of your depth.

    On the other hand, you bashed the US. That's an automatic insightful around here.

  23. Re:Sounds legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've known artists going to conventions in the US, from Canada, who didn't fill out the proper paperwork, and were turned away at the border by US Customs. They had their artwork with them, and since they were going to sell it in the US, needed a different visa.

    Not that uncommon.

  24. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

    In fact, if he wasn't a member of the EU he would have also been deported from Ireland, the UK, Spain, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, etc, etc, etc....

    Utter BS. Where do you get that kind of information?!

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  25. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe if the powers in Ottawa [home of the federal government, responsible for immigration policies and legislation] move their ass, it would be less of an option to file fraudulent refugee claims in Toronto.

  26. Don't let your biases override your reason by maelstrom · · Score: 0

    While I do think that Homeland "Security" is out of control, this doesn't seem like a good example of it.

    Put yourself in custom's shoes.

    You search a bag and find a bunch of materials for black hat hacking.

    Maybe you look up Blackhat Hacking on wikipedia:

    "A black-hat is a term in computing for someone who compromises the security of a system without permission from an authorized party, usually with the intent of accessing computers connected to the network."

    You ask the guy about it and say, "Are you getting paid to present these materials?"

    "Yes."

    "Do you have a permit to work in the USA?"

    "No."

    In your mind, case closed at that point. I'm sorry this happened, but is it really so shocking?

    --
    The more you know, the less you understand.
    1. Re:Don't let your biases override your reason by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      In your mind, case closed at that point. I'm sorry this happened, but is it really so shocking? I have two things to say:

      1. I'm sure everyone has been in situations where the person behind the desk has all the authority they need to make your problem go away... but by rigidly follows the rules, refuses to do anything to help you. That's the bureaucratic mindset you've described and it generally isn't a good thing.

      2. Do you think this sort of thing would have happened to someone with the right connections? Or would they have bent over backwards to smooth out the bumps?
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Don't let your biases override your reason by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      In your mind, case closed at that point. I'm sorry this happened, but is it really so shocking?

      Whats really shocking is that he didn't wind up in Gitmo.

      I mean *what* has the department of homeland security come to????

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  27. WRONG VISA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    He had the wrong fucking visa, why are there so many people here who hate the US saying ZOMG HE GOT DEPORTZ0R3D FCUK THE UNITED STATES I HATE AMERICANS? Big fucking deal people, it happens every day. You just get all inflamed over the stupidest things. Now go back to being afraid that the evil Americans are going to send you to Guantanamo because you picked your nose in the customs line. Fucktards.

    1. Re:WRONG VISA by CaptainZapp · · Score: 1

      Now go back to being afraid that the evil Americans are going to send you to Guantanamo because you picked your nose in the customs line. Fucktards.

      You know dude, that's not so much the point as that I spend my tourist Euros rather in places where I feel welcome. Now, giving your quite foul attitude you probably couldn't care less. But consider this:

      Very qualified researchers and students shun the US and prefer to teach and study in other places. Important conferencs are held outside of the US. Evil, but important foreigners from multinational companies refuse to fly into the US for meetings, due to the crap and the indignity they are put through.

      You may say, who cares? Well, for a start the deans of a few top university who voiced their fears about tightening (alas useless) immigration laws years ago, the economy will care. Multinational US companies care, since it's much, much harder to find top people outside of the US who are willing to put up with this shit. All those consequences are medium to long term, but will hurt the US. There are a lot more good reasons why a xenophobic attitude towards everything foreign, especially highly qualified people, will hurt a country.

      Now who exactly is the fucktard?

      --
      ich bin der musikant

      mit taschenrechner in der hand

      kraftwerk

  28. RTFA People by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you read the article you would see it wasn't immigration that stopped him it was customs when they searched his bags and found the training materials.

    So is was a technicality that he did not get into the country. He passed through immigration one time, then got stopped because of training material in the suitcase, which led to the interview after which he was deported.

  29. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    Because I've been to Ireland, UK, France, Romania, and Switzerland.

    In all but France have I been told that working is strictly forbidden. So unless he lived in a country that had a treaty, he probably wouldn't be able to work there [hence the non-EU comment].

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  30. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... arrg ... The federal MPs are made up of elected officials from ALL OVER CANADA. I'm so sick and tired of "Ottawa" getting the wrap for what the federal government does.

    If you hate the way things are look at what your MPs are doing.

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  31. I'll be the first to rail against the US but... by Hangtime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    every country has this issue. All countries don't like foreigners taken their jobs. Look into any work visa program in any country and it is extremely difficult to gain authorization and very easy to make mistakes. When I was traveling back and forth to Canada with my company I was ALWAYS sure to brief the customs people that I was not there "for work" but rather "attending business meetings." There is a large difference.

    1. Re:I'll be the first to rail against the US but... by goaliemn · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I do work overseas and have similar issues. Every country has rules like this, some worse than the US. Try getting a job in Canada and be a US Citizen. Its not that easy.

    2. Re:I'll be the first to rail against the US but... by alderX · · Score: 1

      Fair, but on the other hand you have to keep in mind that foreigners (those who have to go through immigrations) are not used to those kinds of word play. Essentially "attending business meetings" is also "work" - at least my company pays me for.

  32. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by towermac · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I missed the racism. Maybe it was "each one has 4 mexican kids". Kind of stereotypical but not too far above the average.
    Explain it to us fucking retards, if you would.

    I believe he was making a point about our laws being enforced selectively on a guy who likely was not going to "take" a job from any american, as opposed to illegal mexicans; where every job they take depresses wages and puts one of us out of work. ("us" includes americans of mexican descent, blacks, whites, guest alien workers - everybody).

    Not only that, but the fact that they don't (can't) pay taxes and have to go to the emergency room for any medical care means it costs us a lot more than a lost job. Multiply that by the number of kids in the household.

    Hell, if anything, a guy like this Dullien raises wages when he comes here to work, and we should be glad to have him. Not my first target in the enforcement of immigration laws.

  33. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by phantomlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Being upset about illegal aliens is one thing but the blatant racism is not only unnecessary How can we have a discussion about illegal aliens if one side is always going to cry "racism" in an appeal to emotion to try to shut the other side up? If his Walmart has illegal Mexicans in it, then they do. It's a statement of fact, not racism. Why, just last night, I saw four in my local Walmart in NY. How do I know they're illegals? I know the farmer they work for. Every spring they come up and every fall, he drives them back to Mexico. Am I suddenly being racist just because I said there were 4 illegal Mexicans there? I haven't made a judgment in any way. If you claim I made a judgment by calling them illegal aliens and I shouldn't use that word, well, tough. It's what they are and why are you the one who gets to frame the entire terminology of the debate?

    That's one of the biggest problems in American politics today... nobody is willing to speak the truth because of constant appeals to emotion, ad hominems, character assassinations when the message is too strong to shoot down, etc.

    Republicans want to starve your kids, kill the old people and erode the foundation of our country by eliminating immigration!
    Democrats want to steal all your money, hate America and drive us back to the stone age!
    Republicans hate minorities!
    Democrats hate Christians!

    Facts and logic rarely enter any political debate anymore, it's all about who can sling the most mud and frame their opponent into a seemingly evil corner.
    --
    Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
  34. Standard B1 visa should have been enough by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 5, Informative
    A B1 visa should have been enough since he had no intention of living in USA. I have frequently travelled to USA on a B1 for business purposes. For many nationalities B1 falls under the vis waiver program.

    However, when you travel into USA there are certain words you should use carefully. "Work" is one of those. Don't say "I am coming to work in USA". Say "I am on business, attending a conference".

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Standard B1 visa should have been enough by tomstdenis · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bingo. As asinine as the G is, if he had actually lined up his ducks in a row, he'd probably be on his way to the con now.

      I actually had an experience like that. I was touring to Broadcom to do a little side project for them. The idea was that the people who wanted the work done were in San Diego, but they would pay me through the Canadian branch of Broadcom. I'd go there to get the specs, then head home to do the work.

      I told the customs dude [in Toronto no less] that I was "heading to the states for work." It was at 3am [6am flight] and I wasn't thinking right. The guy asked me about a visa and I said I didn't have one. Then he got all uppity about stealing jobs and all that. I told him that I was doing the work in Canada, but I had to meet the people first. I had to do a secondary check and had my fingerprints taken/etc. Was really unnerving. If I just told them I was heading there for a business meeting it would have been a simple process...

      Anyways, I agree, whenever the subject of "work" comes up around US customs you have to make sure you have your wording correct. Otherwise they just assume you're a job thieving illegal alien and will get all uppity.

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Standard B1 visa should have been enough by echucker · · Score: 1

      ... and the same thing can happen going from the US to Canada. When someone from our firm went north to repair a piece of equipment, he caught the same kind of crap. Why? Because he had his tools with him, and said he was going across to fix equipment. First question they asked at the border was if a Canadian could do the job.

    3. Re:Standard B1 visa should have been enough by godfra · · Score: 1

      I've had a similar thing happen. Flew to Boston from London a few years ago to cover for another guy in our US office while his kid was sick.

      Like an idiot I told the customs guy that I was there to work for three weeks, and I couldn't even tell him where I was working, or where I would be staying, as the whole thing was being organised by our guys at the other end. Was pretty scary but in the end I think he just felt sorry for me and let me go through.

      Next time I'll just lie, it's easier.

  35. DMCA by spoonist · · Score: 1, Funny

    Well at least he wasn't denied entry and/or sent to Gitmo on DMCA grounds.

    1. Re:DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, like those two items have anything in connection with each other, besides their creator being an office full of belligerent assholes.

    2. Re:DMCA by Kopiok · · Score: 1

      ... You don't get sent to Gitmo for breaking the DMCA. Why does the world (including many Americans) think that Gitmo is where we send all of our criminals?

  36. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by towermac · · Score: 1

    Even if they are illegal, they pay taxes because it is withheld from their pay checks. Illegals tend to overpay payroll taxes because although they pay withholding they don't get refunds; they also get social security and Medicare withheld from their wages. Good point. Which is why politicians love them - they pay taxes and get work done with none of that pesky voting and other crap those ungrateful citizens are constantly whining about.
  37. Re:Sounds legit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is /. Everything is a sinister plot by the government, done for the reason of just being evil. No other reason. They just feel like being evil. Not sure why, but if you think for yourself and ask such questions, then you're obviously a stupid sheeple (and you don't think for yourself, also obvious) and deserve modded down instead of being replied to intelligently.

  38. Should have just snuck in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He should have just snuck across the Southern Border. The administration doen't seem to have a problem with the thousands of people who have done it already.

    1. Re:Should have just snuck in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...you mean tens of millions

  39. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you buy gas, rent an apartment, or anything else in the US without getting taxes involved?

    Admittedly, I haven't lived in that many places in the USA, but I've never paid or heard of an apartment tax.

  40. We don't need no education! by geoff+lane · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thank god, the US has no need of foreigners coming in and teaching. If that kind of crazy idea caught on, all hell would break loose. The population might become sufficiently educated to start to question the silly rules.

    1. Re:We don't need no education! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That explains why so many foreigners come to the US to get an education. Yeah, that must be it. +5 Funny? More like -1 Troll.

    2. Re:We don't need no education! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The opportunity to travel, perhaps?
      I'm in NZ, and I'm pretty sure we do have more American students here than Kiwi students in the US, but aside from that, running off to some foreign country to study is still seen as pretty neat, so lots of people do go to asia, south america, europe, where ever. It combines the traditional after-Uni OE with, the actual Uni bit.
      And it's the chance to get out of a beautiful and awesome, but very wee country for a bit.

  41. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by garcia · · Score: 1

    I didn't ask him to STFU. I told him that he should not detract from his valid argument by being racist.

  42. From personal experience, I'd disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada's really no better, I got held by Canadian immigration at Ottawa airport and pretty much interrogated for 3 hours the first time I ever visited. I'm not pretending it's a common occurance but they asked many things they have no business asking (What my income is for example) and made a record of this as I've been back 5 times since and whilst I never got sent through to the immigration office since they've still brought up various parts of the original interrogation. They also searched the contents of my laptop, opening various personal documents (C.V. etc.) and took my fingerprint and my photo.

    I was only there for a holiday and frankly it's the worst I've ever been treated by any customs/immigration service in any country (including the US). Don't get me wrong however, I completely agree with the sentiment of your post, however I think you'll find most customs/immigration services have their fair share of assholes who like powertripping with people powerless to do anything - during my ordeal I was told they'd send me home on the next flight back if I was lying on a few occasions even though I told them the gods honest truth in answer to every question.

    In hindsight I wish I'd challenged them more, because I'm not convinced many of the things they asked me were within their legal remit although I could be wrong, furthermore they clearly logged data which again I'm pretty sure isn't in their legal remit, however after contacting the Canadian embassy in London for information on how I could put forward a complaint I was told the only way was to fax them and that it could take upto 3 months for a response to each fax which frankly was pretty useless.

    If you really want a free country to host this type of convention try Norway or Sweden perhaps, when I went to Narvik it was literally straight off the plane, into the arrivals lounge and out the airport, that is, there was absolutely no checking of passports at all however this could presumably be because they figure if British airport security is letting them through then they must have been checked rigorously enough to get through Norwegian seemingly non-existent airport security.

  43. Two words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but the blatant racism Straw. Man.
  44. Re:Works both ways by mudetroit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The company I work for is a parent company of a Canadian company. The Canadian company is taking over a new contract at a large manufacturing plant in Ontario. The Canadian division of my company doesn't have the infrastructure to get the new program on its feet, and as such was bringing in a few people,3 of us to be specific, to get the new people they were hiring up to speed. None of us had any interest in taking Canadian jobs, but the hassle in getting Immigration to understand this was unnerving.

  45. They still have security conferences in the US? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I thought they would have learned by now not to have security conferences in the US. Anyway, US visa and dealing with DHS (immigration) is so difficult that anyone who is expecting international attendees should pick some other country to host the conference. There is a short list of countries (Western Europe, high-income countries in Asia) where people can easily get visas to the US. For people not from those countries it can be nearly impossible to get a visa. And even for Western Europeans and high-income Asians, they can still get turned away upon arrival. This country is not a good pick for hosting international conferences.

  46. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's almost ridiculously easy to hide workers from the books in some industries (be they American or not). Any industry which involves cash transactions or barter can hide income (which can then be used to avoid taxes entirely, to pay workers under the table, etc). I know of restaurants and entertainment venues who pay most of their (American only) staff under the table. I know a farmer who trades hay for dental work (bonus: farmer writes it off as bad yield and the dentist gets to write it off as making a repair to a tooth his fixed wrong). Those farmers you see with a roadside stand, do you think that all gets reported?

    You can also play hide the cash games with shell companies. Look at how well big corporations can hide money despite recent regulatory changes. I'm not sure how things are where you live, but here, none of the illegal workers I know of pay any taxes (outside of the sales tax when they spend the money they don't take/send home). I also know at least 100 Americans over the last decade or so who didn't report (at least some) income who've never been caught.

  47. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    Apartment taxes do exist in some areas, for example the state of AZ charges a percentage on rentals, and of course by paying rent you are indirectly also paying real estate taxes which are pretty much universal. This is why people who live in apartments are entitled to send their children to schools and otherwise use services in the town where they rent.

    Some states (example NJ) also give some sort of rebate to renters that is tied to property taxes.

  48. Re:Works both ways by tomstdenis · · Score: 1

    I know the feeling. I was employee #5 of AMD Canada [oddly enough based in San Jose California]. Needless to say their Canadian operations are really small. Mostly just sales folk. I think I was the only software engineer.

    Had a lot of messed up hiring dealings since the HR staff is based in the states. They actually had Canadian forms though for things like taxes though. But occasionally I'd be asked for my SSN or be offered a W-2 ... :-)

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  49. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

    It's a conference. If you want to attend a conference in Europe, you present your invitation and are issued a visa.

    --
    I hope I didn't brain my damage.
  50. Both sides are nuts by computerman413 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Halvar was wrong for not having the correct visa. That being said, the government should probably spend their money going after the millions of people who come in illegally through the Mexican border, with the intent to stay a lot longer than a week, instead of a single German guy doing a little work and attending a conference. Not to mention, it is quite possible that terrorists are crossing the Mexican border to get in, now that we have 'no-fly lists' and 'watch lists'.

    1. Re:Both sides are nuts by westlake · · Score: 1
      Halvar was wrong for not having the correct visa. That being said, the government should probably spend their money going after the millions of people who come in illegally through the Mexican border

      If you come through a legal port of entry, you have to have your ducks in a row. If you want to make a few bucks harvesting cabbages on the Tex-Mex border, you can take your chances.

    2. Re:Both sides are nuts by tftp · · Score: 1
      His point was that a whole army of terrorists can sneak in over the Mexican border while the DHS is frisking one German scientist.

      To add to the misery, the German may be banned from entering forever, whereas if a terrorist is stopped at the Mexican border he will pretend to be a Mexican, be sent back to Mexico, and will try again in a few days - repeat until he is through. Mission accomplished.

  51. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by phantomlord · · Score: 1

    and he was racist exactly HOW? Because he used the word "Mexican"?

    --
    Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
  52. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Um, only if it's not for work.

    My stamp from the UK explicitly states "Employment and Recourse to public funds prohibited." I think that means I can't get paid to work there... fairly certain :-)

    And for the record, the UK customs is just as nasty as the americans. Worse yet because usually I'm so f'ing tired I just don't want to deal with them. At least in the states I'm so close to home that I can put up with their asinine questions and all that.Though to be fair I've also had just as much trouble with Canadian customs [and I'm a cannuck!].

    I once did a trip in 2006 to the states [actually to AMD in San Jose] on nothing more than my drivers license [I was renewing my passport]. No trouble on the way there, but on the way back the folk at the San Jose airport didn't want to let me get a boarding card [I asked them how they thought I made it to San Jose ...]. Then when I landed in Toronto, they were asking to see proof of citizenship [which a driver licenses is not]. Then they asked about 20 more questions [e.g. where were you born, how long were you in the states, etc...].

    Tom

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  53. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by mudetroit · · Score: 1

    That was the point though he wasn't just attending the conference, that is an entirely different discussion.

    He was getting paid to do work in the US, and that is a touchy issue going into most countries.

  54. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by badfish99 · · Score: 1

    TFA states that he is German. So he can work in any EU country, without any need for a visa. Except for the UK, he wouldn't even need to show a passport at the border.

  55. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by hjf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't an anti-american post, this is the point of view of someone outside America, so please think twice before downmodding. So, here we go.

    so what? I mean, americans have this weird sense of what's right and what's wrong. For one, Spanish seems to be some kind of dirty language, something only ugly dark-skinned people speak. It's the language of evil. What's wrong with being bilingual? If schools start teaching spanish people complain. Why? I mean... "the more you know", right? If instead of speaking one language, you can speak 2? That's cool, opens a lot of possibilities.

    Also, america is also ashamed of the south. You like white christmas and all that crap, and also, that's the way christmas is supposed to be. I wonder if christmas is white in Florida, or even in New Orleans? No, but you don't talk about that. People in those places go barefoot and drive in dirt roads, ewww. They also chase alligators and fish in the mississippi. I mean, if you're fishing it MUST be in some pretty lake or a crystaline river, surrounded by mountains and brown maple leaves in fucking vermont.

    What the fuck is wrong with you people? There's a whole world of things, languages, foods, places, and you complain because ILLEGALS ARE TAKING OUR JOBS AND NOT PAYING TAXES! What good are taxes for? I mean, in my country I can at least get FREE medical attention, even AIDS drugs. Even if I don't have a job and don't pay taxes. Hell, even if I'm not a citizen, I can still get all of that. Do you pay your taxes? What do these taxes do anyway? You need to pay for health, food, college. In my country, at least I can CHOOSE. I can pay for health, or use the State health services (sometimes the latter is better). I can go to a private university, but I can also go (and I do) to a state-funded university (and my degree is just as good in any of them). And I can even get free food from the government (and not food stamps, to be treated like scum at the store).

    Do you realize that you are living in a country that spends half of the WORLD'S combined budgets in defense? What good has it been? You had 9/11, but "nobody saw that coming". You had Katrina, but "nobody saw that coming". And it's your fault, because you whine about Wal-Mart, but still buy there. You whine about the illegal immigrants, but if you were a store owner, you would hire one. You whine about catastrophes (natural or terrorism), but you don't have the people you need, because they're fighting in a war far away, trying to STEAL resources from a poor country.

    America has the potential to be a fucking PARADISE, if you only cut the crap, the fear of "socialism" and "communism", the "take care of yourself and fuck everyone else" attitude. America never sleeps, they're ever waiting for doomsday to happen, the day China, Korea, or even some crappy island in the pacific will try to attack you. But instead of just waiting, you go and provoke everyone, showing off your weapons and killing innocent people all over the world. Dude, NOTHING will happen to america. Just stop messing with the rest of the world. In the process you will save BILLIONS of dollars, that could be spent in education, health, etc. But no, you have been brainwashed into thinking "that's communism!".

    What good is the government for? Are they only there to "govern" you? To tell you what to do? (You know, only in the world's worst dictatorships a police officer draws his gun and put it in your head, let alone "take you in custody" for no reason other than suspected terrorism. Oh yea, and in america that happens too. IF a police officer tells you to get out of the car, and you don't obey, you are likely to be put in front of a loaded gun, or maced. Even if your children are in the car.) You know what that is? That's the government AFRAID of you. How can you live in a country where the government is afraid of you? In my country 15 years ago we gave the people the option to have their retirement funds in a 401(k)-like system. Your money was invested, you get interests from it, etc. Now a

  56. Sending Halvar back is one thing.... by cosicosa · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...reading these knee-jerk jingoist responses on /. is quite another.

    And no, not just because ppl should RTFA before engaging in ludicrous parochialisms.

    Consider: The Copernican revolution in how the US (unlike any other Western country) deals with travellers like Halvar coming to its borders from a legal, cultural, historical perspective is in the context of a wholesale erosion of human and civil rights -- of American citizens (not the hapless foreigner popping in to educate you). Realise how these incidents do sustained damage to the US reputation, its economy and its already shockingly insular society, and you will also catch a glimpse of the loss of rights and freedoms for Americans themselves.

    1. Re:Sending Halvar back is one thing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't work for them!

    2. Re:Sending Halvar back is one thing.... by zippthorne · · Score: 0, Troll

      Jingoist responses? "Copernican revolution"? Wow. Just.. wow.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  57. Karma be damned !! by Dolphinzilla · · Score: 0, Redundant

    A lot of comments saying that the US is not a free country - So "free" countries have to let anybody cross their borders ? There are rules governing entry for work, vacation, etc. Every single country in Europe, the Middle East, the Far East and every other place I have ever been has the same requirements or much more so. If you want to visit the US, follow the rules, or don't bother coming - I would expect no different treatment in any other country that has the sense to control its borders....

    1. Re:Karma be damned !! by LindaMack · · Score: 1

      This is new here, an authority fanboi :)
      How may I subscribe to your newsletter?

  58. Re:I sure wish... by Iron+Condor · · Score: 1

    I sure wish those goons would show up at the house down the street from me that is occupied by 4 illegal alien families, and deport them for not having the right visa...

    If you know that there is a crime being committed, then YOU are obligated to report it. If you know that they are illegal and you do not report them, then you are a criminal for obstructing justice.

    If you don't know that they're illegal, then you have just accused people of being criminals for no reason better than their heritage.

    And that is indeed racism.

    --
    We're all born with nothing.
    If you die in debt, you're ahead.
  59. US visa system is a fraud anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Citizens of my country need visas to enter US even as a tourists. US administration says they could lift visas in case that over (say) 85% of visa aplications in recent past got approved. This would be fair, if giving aproval or denying visa was without an arbitrary element. But it's got. So there is a catch 22. This arbitrary element is conversation with an embassy office worker.
    To make things worse, they sometimes employ people who apparently hate being here and hate local people.
    I never had problems with geting my visa, but altogether this is very humiliating process. And now, since "war of 'terror'" entering US is even more humiliating...

  60. My Experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the 1st time I've posted anonymously, I believe a little caution is in order.

    I'm an engineer from Canada. Sometimes, we get a contract from an American prime. As part of that, I travel to the US to do some of the work. Since I'm not being paid by an American company I usually get past the border without the need for a work permit.

    Sometimes, an enthusiastic border agent (aka odious prick), decides I need a work permit. I'm looking at it right now, it's apparently called an I-94, whatever that is. It costs $50.

    When I was working as a contractor for a US prime that has a facility in Canada, they arranged for me to work assignments at their US facilities without requiring this. Although, one time the border morons sent me into the naughty bin and gave me some piece of paper, I don't know what it was, it didn't cost anything.

    Sometimes they don't require me to have any sort of permit.

    The last trip, when they made me buy this I-94 thing, the agent in the naughty bin told me "engineers aren't exactly in demand." Yes ma'am whatever you say ma'am. Thinking: moron. When I arrived at the facility where I'm working, my super is Canadian, the guy I work with most closely is a brit, the office is full of people from France, Russia, and lots of Canadians. They pay us a lot. As far as I can tell, Americans aren't available because they are all working massive defense contracts that are sucking up the local talent and distorting the job market. If it wasn't for us foreigners, this company I'm working for, a high profile sub for a very high profile civilian aircraft program you have all heard of, would be fucked.

    All through the cold war, when the USSR truly wanted to destroy the US, AND the USSR had backpack nukes, the US/Canada border was open. If the border could be open then, when one or 2 individuals could have walked into the US with a nuke, very realistically, why do I need a passport now? It's bullshit. The US and Canada have integrated economies, now more than ever, but the horseshit ignorance that drives US decisions about everything these days trumps...trumps what? Reality?

    Who the fuck knows what some border agent is going to decide one day. Maybe he'll find out about that, er, thing that happened in college. Maybe he'll see a name that looks like mine on some fucked up list. Maybe his girlfriend cheated on him. Maybe he saw a Bruce Willis movie the night before. One of these days I'm going to be send back home, or worse, for some bullshit reason, unable to work.

    And trust me people, I'm exactly, precisely, like everyone else here.
    1. Re:My Experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you're not, Tom. You're an asshole of the highest order.

    2. Re:My Experiences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pot, kettle, black. Dick.

  61. Re:Works both ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The company I work for is a parent company of a Canadian company. The Canadian company is taking over a new contract at a large manufacturing plant in Ontario. The Canadian division of my company doesn't have the infrastructure to get the new program on its feet, and as such was bringing in a few people,3 of us to be specific, to get the new people they were hiring up to speed. None of us had any interest in taking Canadian jobs, but the hassle in getting Immigration to understand this was unnerving.

    So, you will be working in Canada - if you're not a Canadian citizen or permanent resident, you are not entitled to work in Canada without a visa. As is the case in most countries, foreigners are not entitled to work without a visa, so GO GET A VISA YOU IDIOT!!!!

    There is even a special category of visas for people like you (working for the same company or a subsidiary), not to mention other visas you might qualify for, like the TN (NAFTA) visa. The paperwork is very easy, but you have to do it.

    The fact that your company didn't bother to file the paperwork is the cause of your problems, and it reflects poorly on your company. If your company owns a subsidiary in a different country, one might have thought your company would be familiar with the procedures to send staff in both directions across the border for work purposes.

    Look, if you have no idea what you are doing when it comes to immigration law (and many people don't), then go ask an expert - an immigration lawyer. If this is for your business, it will be a deductible expense.

    Bunch of idiots. You're going to have a hell of a time in the global marketplace.

  62. I've got some ocean front property in Alberta... by Rix · · Score: 1

    And I'll let you have it *real* cheap.

    Of course he was denied because the session was on security. He'd been allowed to do this for years, and was only stopped when they looked at his literature.

  63. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by Graff · · Score: 1

    They've made it quite clear that they don't like "furriners", so why are people still pressing the issue? Canada is a free and open society, and just to the north. Too bad we really do like "foreigners" (I guess you Canadians spell it differently) here in the USA. However, you try getting bombed a few times and then we'll see just how flexible things will be in Canada.

    The reality of the situation is that once you have a serious terrorist attack or two on your soil then everything gets clamped down a bit more. No one wants to be the person who lets the next would-be terrorist into the country. This means that everyone from the top down doesn't have any desire to bend the rules a bit to make life easier. Even with this we still have a fairly free and open society here in the USA, most likely just as free and open as Canadian society.

    Maybe you should exercise some of that "free and open" thought that you are trumpeting and try to understand the whole situation rather than just being nasty about it?
  64. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by Hemogoblin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Disclaimer: I'm an Immigration Officer with the CBSA, but this post only contains my personal opinion and I don't represent the Government of Canada.

    I'm not sure why you were modded information, since you're spreading false information.

    In Canada, Public speakers at seminars or conferences that do not go longer than 5 days do not require a work permit, nor do they require a visa if they come from a visa exempt country. Please see the IRPA regulation 186(j) and the Temporary Foreign Workers policy manual section 5.11. Unfortunately, the policy manual is only available in pdf.

  65. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by dkf · · Score: 0, Troll

    Except for the UK, he wouldn't even need to show a passport at the border. Not quite. There are still a fair number of internal borders (try travelling to Poland or Hungary...) and the UK does have a border with another country which you can cross without a passport IIRC, being Ireland. (The UK and Ireland are close in a number of other respects too. For example, citizens of one are allowed to vote in the other's national elections when resident; this is the only example I know of where non-citizens are permitted to vote in such an election. I don't think any other pair of EU countries are that close, for example.)
    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  66. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could we keep folks from Michigan/Kansas and other places north away from OKC please?

    The US has always has a bad rep concerning immigration, read "foreigners". I would posit that most of the non-native ancestry US citizens would not be here if the immigration standards for their ancestors had been stricter than breathing, strong back and no pink eye.

  67. put him on the next plane back to Germany. by iminplaya · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Well, at least he got away. Luckily he wasn't sent on a plane to Gitmo. For the rest who probably should stay away for their own safety, there's always tele-conferencing. The US has become hostile terrortory. Please hold the event in Canada(maybe) next time. Or just est up a bunch of cameras and monitors in the stadium and everybody can participate safely from their homes...if they're not Americans, or probably Germans (KisMAC) as the case may be.

    --
    What?
  68. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Republicans want to starve your kids, kill the old people and erode the foundation of our country by eliminating immigration!
    Democrats want to steal all your money, hate America and drive us back to the stone age!
    Republicans hate minorities!
    Democrats hate Christians! All true.
  69. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by Graff · · Score: 1

    I would posit that most of the non-native ancestry US citizens would not be here if the immigration standards for their ancestors had been stricter than breathing, strong back and no pink eye. Ahh, I didn't see it was derogatory remark day at Slashdot! I believe this sums up your anonymous post:

    Green Blackboards (And Other Anomalies)
  70. Who can enter under the VWP? by westlake · · Score: 3, Informative
    Under the Visa Waiver Program, an individual working in such a scenario is not considered "working in the US" until they hit 90 days. "The Visa Waiver Program (VWP) enables nationals of certain countries to travel to the United States for tourism or business for stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa

    Q: Who Is Eligible to Use the VWP?
    A: To qualify for the VWP, you must:

    * Intend to enter the United States for 90 days or less;
    * Have a passport lawfully issued to you by a VWP country that is valid for six months beyond your intended visit;
    * Be a national of the VWP country that issued your passport;
    * Have been checked using an automated electronic database containing information about inadmissible aliens to the United States;
    * Have a return trip ticket to any foreign destination other than a territory bordering on the United States or an adjacent island unless:

    1. You are a resident of an adjacent island,
    2. This requirement is waived by the Attorney General under regulations, or
    3. You are a visitor for business who arrives aboard a private aircraft that maintains a valid agreement guaranteeing to transport you out of the United States, if you are found to be inadmissible or deportable;

    * Present to the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officer a completed and signed Form I-94W, Nonimmigrant Visa Waiver Arrival/Departure Form. (Please see "How Do I Get an Arrival Departure Document?" for more information about arrival/departure records.);

    * Not pose a safety threat to the United States;
    * Not have failed to comply with the conditions of any previous admission under the Visa Waiver Program;
    * If arriving by air or sea, you must arrive aboard a carrier that signed an agreement, "signatory carrier", guaranteeing to transport you out of the United States if you are found to be inadmissible or deportable;
    * Convince the examining CBP officer that you are clearly and beyond a doubt entitled to be admitted and that you are not inadmissible under section 212 of the Act. For reasons that would make you inadmissible, please see the Immigration and Nationality Act at INA 212 (a);
    * Waive any right to review or appeal a CBP officer's decision as to your admissibility, other than on the basis of an application for asylum or an application for withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; and
    * Waive any right to challenge your removal, other than on the basis of an application for asylum or an application for withholding of removal under the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment. Overview of the Visa Waiver Program (VWP)

  71. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd say he displayed xenophobia, which could be and often is naïvely mislabeled as racism, by mentioning the fact that people speak Spanish in his Wal-Mart as something negative.

    (That's in the subject line; the fact that he views the economic and the legal issues as problematic is, in itself, neither racist nor xenophobic. It could of course be rooted in either racism or xenophobia—one would have to be the poster, or at the very least know him or her, to be sure.)

  72. Not that strange... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a question US Customs always ask when you go to a conference in the US -- do you carry merchandise or are you going to get any sort of payment. If the answer is yes to either, you can't normally use a visitor visa (or visa waiver like Germans and some others can).

  73. In unrelated news, by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    Thousands of government computers mysteriously crashed today. Official spokesman stated "sunspots" as the probable cause.

  74. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by macshit · · Score: 1

    The reality of the situation is that once you have a serious terrorist attack or two on your soil then everything gets clamped down a bit more. No one wants to be the person who lets the next would-be terrorist into the country.

    I don't think it has much to do with terrorism actually (except to the extent that "terrorism" is the current administration's general purpose excuse for just about everything).

    It's really easy to get a U.S. tourist or student visa, and they're every bit as useful to a potential terrorist as a work visa. The U.S.'s stupidity with regard to work visas has far more to do with domestic politics ("protecting jobs" is a vote getter -- and most of the people who are thus disadvantaged can't vote!).

    [Other countries do the same thing of course, but in my experience (having worked abroad in several different countries), the U.S. is just worse: in many first-world countries, if the company really wants to hire you, it's a pretty sure bet you'll be able to get a work visa/permit (there are typically tough sounding rules, but companies know how to deal with them); in the U.S. it's much more of a crapshoot, regardless of what the company does.]

    --
    We live, as we dream -- alone....
  75. Absolutely right by fv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Absolutely right! Halvar is extraordinarily talented and it will be a terrible shame if his class is canceled. But it starts on Monday, so unless they do it by video conference I can't see him making it. I still hope to see him when I fly to Vegas on Thursday, but the odds aren't good :(.

    I'd like to know just what the immigration department expects US conferences to do when bringing in foreign speakers. Halvar says they wanted to treat him like an "employee" of BlackHat and get an H1-B visa. But that is a ridiculous as it is a multi-year process. Halvar thinks coming as a representative of his own German company will help, but we shouldn't have to require that foreigners incorporate just to give a simple presentation or training class here.

    I'm an American who has been paid to give presentations and training in many countries, including Germany. And I've never been hassled by their immigration dept. or received any special visas. So its embarrassing and harmful that the US subjects visitors to our country to all of this crap (including the fingerprinting and pushing other countries toward RFID passports). Its no wonder that many conference producers, including BlackHat, have been increasing the number of cons held offshore. The US just isn't seen as a welcoming place.

    Pardon the long rant, but I hate seeing my friends put through this. And I'm sure similar things happen to thousands of people we don't know every day. Also, if those of us in the US don't fix our system, other countries might copy it and then we'll have to deal with this shit when we travel.

    -Fyodor
    Insecure.Org

  76. Montreal, Toronto, Vancouver await you.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Re: Visa insanity down south.

    Move Blackhat 2008 to one of Canada's many lovely cities just across the border.

    Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver are close, safe, and charming places to hold conferences with lots of good convention centre space, and no visa insanity either..

  77. computer geeks cant do live streaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really, is it that hard?

    Mike him well, put the camera on a stand (3/4 body) and do the lecture online.

    Seriously, call him on Skype and send it from the laptop to a big ass screen, we did that for our grandmother's birthday so right now she's waaaaay more tech savvy than these sad sallies.

  78. I understand the situation much better than you by Rix · · Score: 0, Troll

    Don't want to get bombed? Don't bomb other people.

    It really is that simple. The blowback you are now receiving was entirely predictable, and you have no justification to complain about it now.

    1. Re:I understand the situation much better than you by dhazard · · Score: 1

      I wish life was this easy. Thanks for making everything make more sense to me!

    2. Re:I understand the situation much better than you by Graff · · Score: 1

      Don't want to get bombed? Don't bomb other people. That's some sage advice there. You'll note that in pretty much all cases the USA didn't bomb first, they bombed as a result of the other nations actions. For example, Iraq attacks Kuwait, a smaller, neighbor nation. The USA comes in along with United Nation forces and forces Iraq to stop its agression.

      Now if you look at the actions of the United States over at least the past 20 years you'll note that we don't have a policy of randomly going around and bombing people, it was always as a reaction to other people's aggressive actions. This is no different than any other nation out there, poke a nation and it will react, same as any individual would.

      I'd ease off that high horse before it throws you and you knock your head on a rock.
    3. Re:I understand the situation much better than you by myowntrueself · · Score: 1

      Now if you look at the actions of the United States over at least the past 20 years you'll note that we don't have a policy of randomly going around and bombing people

      Absolutely correct.

      The USA does not *randomly* bomb just *anyone*. In almost all cases the people who get bombed by the USA are *brown* people. People of *colour*.

      Apart from the Germans, but they were trying to move in on Americas action. "World domination? Thats *our* fuckin job!!!"

      Serbs probably come under that category sort of -- they were bombing *Muslims* thats *Americas* job!!! Cheeky bastards those Serbs, bomb them!!!

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    4. Re:I understand the situation much better than you by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Unfortunately for the US, most people who care know history more than 20 years back, and don't only look at who the US has bombed but also all the other ways various US governments have done their best to interfere. There are literally hundreds of millions of people around the world that suffers or has suffered due to various US governments interference through decades of supplying weapons to dictators, assisting in coups, wars etc., and so it's hardly surprising that a few of them have gone over the edge and opted for extreme measures to hit back.

      You said it yourself - if you poke people, they will react.

  79. Well... I don't want to _live_ in the US anymore by bmajik · · Score: 1

    Problem is, I can't think of where I'd rather live, all things considered.

    What's crazy is that everyone else thinks the US is too far to the "right", too "wild west", what with all our guns and remains of a laizee faire economy. Me? I'd like more guns, fewer laws, more open trade, no more tariffs or subsidies.

    I certainly like that Germany makes the worlds finest cars, has excellent public transit, fantastic roads, beautiful architecture and countryside, and makes lots of smart people. But they're a step in the wrong direction in many of the freedoms I care about.

    For instance, in Germany home schooling is illegal, so I can't very well live there because as much as I dislike the amount of school choice available to me here in the US, I get even less of it in Germany. Even if the choices might be quite a bit better than what I have here, the only choice that I really need ("No thanks, I'll indoctrinate my child MY way instead of letting you indoctrinate him YOUR way") is unavailable to me.

    If there were somewhere that truly had more individual freedoms than the US, I'd think pretty carefully about moving there. Freedoms meaning "free from having to do things the way other people tell you to do them".

    If I had any say in running the US, things would be different. I'd let as many brilliant people into my country as we had room for, (which would attract more brilliant people, who are good at making more room!). But, I don't have any say. Libertarians have no voice in American politics, and America is growing the hydra heads of big government that pushed many people away from Europe in the first place... and yet we're coming up with some of our own unique stupidity that makes the mix that much more sour.

    So if you've got any suggestions on places to live that respect individual liberty, let me hear em. I'm happy to contribute my talents to whomever will unshackle me to do my best work and live my life to the fullset.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  80. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

    The other half of his comment - about paying hospital bills - is also bogus rhetoric.

    Hospitals have an obligation to stabilize critical patients. That's it. There is no legal requirement to treat anyone who is not critically injured, nor is there a legal requirement to continue care once the patient is in a stable condition. The last few times I've been in a hospital, there were signs posted all over place stating exactly that.

    Thus the common meme that "illegals are bankrupting our hospitals" is pure bogosity. There are a lot of reasons hospitals have been going bankrupt, non-paying illegal aliens is not one of them.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  81. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by phantomlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's wrong with being bilingual? If schools start teaching spanish people complain. Why? I mean... "the more you know", right? If instead of speaking one language, you can speak 2? That's cool, opens a lot of possibilities.

    There's nothing wrong with being bilingual. The proponents of making the US english only see it as a means of protecting our culture, making sure that you can go anywhere in the US and be able to find help if you need it, etc. I respect people's right to do whatever they want (as long as they aren't hurting someone else) but is it really that bad to expect people who want to emigrate to your country to want to actually be a part of that country? By all means, keep your traditions, food, etc and share them with others, but you need to accept some of the culture you decided to be a part of and one of the most fundamental things that define a culture is its language.

    Also factor in that, under the 14th Amendment, if you make government accessible in one alternative language, you have to do it for ALL languages (equal protection clause). I don't remember off the top of my head, but that means making every form, guide, service, etc available in more than 100 languages. I think it's cool if you want to learn the language of the family that lives next door... it's not cool for them to force their language on you. Look at the case in Maryland where a rapist had his case thrown out because they couldn't find a translator for his native language despite him graduating from an US high school which requires fluency in english and his attendence of a state university.

    Also, america is also ashamed of the south. You like white christmas and all that crap, and also, that's the way christmas is supposed to be. I wonder if christmas is white in Florida, or even in New Orleans? No, but you don't talk about that. People in those places go barefoot and drive in dirt roads, ewww. They also chase alligators and fish in the mississippi. I mean, if you're fishing it MUST be in some pretty lake or a crystaline river, surrounded by mountains and brown maple leaves in fucking vermont.

    There is a large cultural divide between the elitists who live in metropolitan areas in the US and those who live in the south and rural areas. You can see it right here on Slashdot pretty frequently, especially in voting related stories. You see, anyone who doesn't vote the way self-righteous "learned" people do must be idiots. It couldn't be that different people value different things and that living in different areas can give you different perspectives on life. When you're making six figures and only surrounded by similar people, it's easy to look down at anyone who doesn't. Besides, those are the peasants who provide you with things like food so they aren't so much human, they're more like servants to the narcissism of the elite.

    What the fuck is wrong with you people? There's a whole world of things, languages, foods, places, and you complain because ILLEGALS ARE TAKING OUR JOBS AND NOT PAYING TAXES! What good are taxes for? I mean, in my country I can at least get FREE medical attention, even AIDS drugs. Even if I don't have a job and don't pay taxes. Hell, even if I'm not a citizen, I can still get all of that. Do you pay your taxes? What do these taxes do anyway? You need to pay for health, food, college. In my country, at least I can CHOOSE. I can pay for health, or use the State health services (sometimes the latter is better). I can go to a private university, but I can also go (and I do) to a state-funded university (and my degree is just as good in any of them). And I can even get free food from the government (and not food stamps, to be treated like scum at the store).

    And such is politics. There are those believe that the government should provide everything you'll ever need. Others believe it is up to the individual to achieve those things a

    --
    Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
  82. Re:Works both ways by mudetroit · · Score: 1

    I am well aware of all of this now, and I do in fact have a TN NAFTA Visa/Work Permit. And though there was a division in Canada, this was in fact the first time that the company had dealt with this.

    You missed the general point of my statement though. I admit that not being aware of what needed to be done wasn't a good situation. My point was that at least in my, albeit limited, experience every country has rules like this. Thinking that this is something special where US Immigration was out to target this guy is probably not true in the least bit.

  83. He should have just snuck in by night_flyer · · Score: 1

    from Mexico...

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  84. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, i live here in the US, and I find your comment completely distasteful and derogatory and make me ashamed that you might be one of our citizens. ENOUGH with the blumin because of terrorism. You want to hide in a hole somewhere, fine, go do it, most of us would like to keep our lives the way they are.

    Thank you very much.

  85. h1-b visa by delvsional · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should have just handed him a fucking ID card. That's what they're doing for all the rest of the illegal immigrants.

    --
    Oh Crap, I'm an optimist.....
  86. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Secrity · · Score: 1

    Until recently it was trivial (~$150) to get a fraudulent green card and social security card.

  87. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Secrity · · Score: 1

    Although Wal-Mart does some scummy things, I seriously doubt that Wal-Mart would hire somebody off the books or without documentation. One of Wal-Mart's janitorial contracting companies was accused of hiring undocumented workers.

  88. Re:Works both ways by thethibs · · Score: 1

    Don't feel too bad. I paid FICA for three years working in Toronto for the local branch of a Santa Monica company.

    --
    I'm a Programmer. That's one level above Software Engineer and one level below Engineer.
  89. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by eli+pabst · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Sure about that? I just looked at the documentation you linked and this seems identical to the issue in the US (From R186(j)):

    Commercial speakers have a vested interest in the event at which they are speaking. Typically, they rent commercial space in a hotel, advertise, charge admission, deliver the event and then leave Canada. If they are doing this for no more than five days on one trip, they can enter under R186(j). This regulation covers situations where the speaker is speaking to multiple groups, as long as the duration of the speaking events is no more than five days, not counting travel time in the case of multiple engagements. Not included in R186(j) are commercial speakers who are hired by a Canadian entity to provide training services. In these cases, other entry options must be explored including HRSDC LMOs or the NAFTA Professional category which allows for professionals to provide training services under some circumstances. So if he went to Canada and said he was being paid by a Canadian company to provide training services, he would need a visa.
  90. It is by Rix · · Score: 1

    Now keep your military to yourself.

  91. Duh?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Duh, just come across at the Rio Grande, dude.

  92. Re:Well... I don't want to _live_ in the US anymor by gatesvp · · Score: 1

    I would say "Join us in Canada", but I don't know how much further that will take you. We have "more taxes", but that pretty much evens out when you factor American healthcare costs.

    We have lots of parties getting votes and seats. A few of which are definitely "not" trying to fight to "be in the middle" and win all of the votes. We have more or less the same freedoms as Americans, but way (way, way) less guns and a way smaller army.

    We have tons and tons and tons of space and more than enough natural resources for this lifetime. So when things start to go south for the USD (maybe too late), the CDN won't be dragged too far, b/c it's still "cashable", it still has value. Of course, it's only a matter of time before the world's biggest army annexes the world's biggest peacekeepers. At which point I guess you'll have more fresh air :(

  93. Mexico is not a free country anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting as AC but lurking /. since 98.

    As many attendants of the Debconf organized here two years ago. Mexico now requires visa for the visitors, I guess this was due to pressure of the US.

  94. His understanding is not very reliable ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    That may be true, but according to his post it isn't Halvar's understanding of the situation.

    Perhaps you should consider a different argument, don't the facts of this case already prove that his understanding of things is not very reliable? ;-)

  95. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by hjf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ah, yes, but you missed my point. It's not about the government providing everything for free. It's about having options. It's about balance. Socialism and communism are extremes, but wild capitalism is also an extreme. I trust my government, I work already and my retirement fund is in the state system from the first day, because I chose so. My neighbor might have chosen a private retirement fund, good for him! I also chose private healthcare, but my mom is a retired "government employee" (a teacher, go figure), so she used a mix of both. You see?

    Another example: Spain. France. Germany. I could go on, but those countries are, to a great extent, socialist. Are they worse than America? Don't they get better? (because you say that taking care of yourself, or your community, makes it better). Let me give you an example, and this is true. I have a friend who lives in spain, and he has a young daughter. He told me that the government sent him a letter, reminding him that the girl didn't go to the dentist in over a year. It reminded him that it was free, any dentist he wanted. Scary? I don't think so. That's what I mean by "the government taking care of you". Sure, they don't do it because it's nice, they do it because detecting a cavity early is cheaper than paying for tooth extraction or whatever. But, when was the last time your HMO sent you a letter, reminding you that you should get a check-up?

    It's more of a thing of altruism I think. You may never understand me, because we see different things. Let me see if I can explain what I think: you are afraid of giving power to the government, because they will come back later to expect something from you. I see it more, you may say idealistically, but well, I think the government is the PEOPLE. The government gives me things (health, whatever), and it expects me to pay taxes, and nothing else. You too are afraid of your government, because of the way you think (warning: I'm not saying it's wrong, I just say I think different): you always expect something in return, and you think everyone else also expects something in return. Well, I think the government is more harmless than a big corporation. Sure, a huge government monopolizing everything is not healthier either.

    Do I hate big corporations? Certainly not, I try to avoid them whenever I can, because you give them more power if you buy things from them. But obviously there are certain things, huge things, that can't be paid by small companies: A large scale network, like the phone, cable, well those are examples of things that can't be done by small companies.

    But then you have the big corporation scandals, all over the place. Enron, Worldcom... A tiny government that allows itself to be lobbied, and that's what happens. Big corporations care only about the numbers, and WILL fuck anything they need in order to keep their numbers high enough (the premise is "it's never enough").

    You also say that "Spending that money brought down the Iron Curtain and freed western Europe." What? Are you on crack or what? That money actually help build the iron curtain. The USSR wasn't as bad as you and I were told it was. If they were poor it was only because you provoked them, you made them spend more and more in weapons and military. If you weren't there to bother them, they MIGHT have been a happy communist country, and nothing else. But no, america can't stand the idea of communism, not even socialism, so we have to destroy it. You didn't free western europe either. You only went there because the japs touched your ass. It wasn't your war. Vietnam wasn't either, and you were there to "free" them.

    See it this way: If you didn't shake the USSR, maybe they wouldn't have needed so many AK-47s. Those AK's wouldn't be in the hand of muslim extremists now. They wouldn't be so powerful, maybe 9/11 wouldn't have happened if you didn't bring down the iron courtain. That's how I see it.

    Dude, wake up. War is business. Billions of dollars in the hands of the corporations who make the weapons, and that's

  96. Not BS, makes perfect sense ... by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

    All through the cold war, when the USSR truly wanted to destroy the US, AND the USSR had backpack nukes, the US/Canada border was open. If the border could be open then, when one or 2 individuals could have walked into the US with a nuke, very realistically, why do I need a passport now? It's bullshit.

    Overall I appreciate your post, but this one point is terribly superficial. The USSR was not suicidal, it's leaders loved their children and wanted them to live and prosper, they did not view a WW3'ish scenario as a prophesized day of judgement where those fighting in the jihad get a free ticket to paradise.

  97. To Germany! by Shardz · · Score: 1

    And next year the hold the con in Germany so as to avoid this. Honestly though is it a big deal? He's (was) already here, just let him go to the freaking con. I hope at least they didn't charge him for the flight back..

    1. Re:To Germany! by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      I hope at least they didn't charge him for the flight back.. HahahaHAHAHA*rotfl* ... that was a good one.

      You can bet they charged him for anything that wasn't covered by his ticket.

  98. Re:I sure wish... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...everyone understands exactly what this guy is saying ...oh, yeah, so he must be a bigot. Well, your're a bigot, I'm a bigot, he's a bigot, racist, blah, blah, blah.

    I repeat, everyone understands exactly what this guy is saying, bigot, racist claims just detract from the actual debate.

    Bigot! --- that claim just goes no where...

  99. Failed the test by Joebert · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some hacker this guy is, can't even socially engineer his way into the country.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  100. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by Graff · · Score: 1
    An Anonymous Coward blathered on about:

    ENOUGH with the blumin because of terrorism. You want to hide in a hole somewhere, fine, go do it, most of us would like to keep our lives the way they are. Well apparently you don't have enough conviction in your argument to say it with a real account. See I'm not hiding in a hole somewhere, I have no problem with letting people not only know what I think but also letting them know who is saying it.

    You'll also note that I didn't say that I AGREED with the terrorism angle, I simply stated that's the reason WHY it is happening.

    Really people, this is Slashdot - news for nerds and all. I figured that geeks would be a step above the usual sheep you meet walking the streets but apparently the sheep post here too...
  101. Re:I sure wish... by couchslug · · Score: 1

    "If you know that there is a crime being committed, then YOU are obligated to report it. If you know that they are illegal and you do not report them, then you are a criminal for obstructing justice."

    Got supporting evidence for that statement?

    Non-reporting does not equal "obstruction". Non-reporting is not an action. "Obstruction" is an action.

    http://research.lawyers.com/glossary/obstruction-o f-justice.html

    http://definitions.uslegal.com/o/obstruction-of-ju stice/

    http://uscode.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18 /usc_sup_01_18_10_I_20_73.html

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  102. Yay, the 2 tech conferences they have a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is easy to be smug when you have like a dozen people employed in the tech sector.

  103. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ummm, that is an anti-american post.... and alot of ignorant nonsense.

  104. Re:Well... I don't want to _live_ in the US anymor by bmajik · · Score: 1

    Certainly Canada has some advantages... its not too far to visit relatives in the US, and unless you're dealing with quebec sepratists, there's not much of a language barrier.

    However, Canada has some strange things like a blank media tax, and some upsetting free speech concerns. Something comes to mind about it being a hate crime in Canada for a pastor to state that they think homosexuality is sinful/immoral. I don't tend to concern myself with the morality of other peoples sexuality, but I concern myself a lot with what the government says I can and cannot say. Although just this week a kid in the US has been charged with 2 felony hate crimes for flushing Qurans in the toilet of his college.. so apparently the US is just as bad now.

    I have taken a trip to Montreal and the women are fantastic looking (although now that I'm married, that's not quite the draw it might have once been), and they have their own F1 GP there, which simply has to be a better experience than going to the US GP in Indianpolis, because Montreal is in all manners a less awful place than Indianpolis.

    The canadians I've met have all had two things in common. 1) They're funny. 2) They're laid back. I could do with more of those sorts of people, honestly.

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  105. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What's wrong with being bilingual? If schools start teaching spanish people complain. Why? I mean... "the more you know", right? If instead of speaking one language, you can speak 2? That's cool, opens a lot of possibilities."

    You're right, now explain that to those coming to the U.S. It is there responsibility to learn OUR language if they want to be here, not our responsibility to learn theirs. They want to communicate in their own language instead of learning english? Fine, stay home and don't come here.

  106. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    posting anon since we're so far off topic nobody else deserves to see it.

    But, when was the last time your HMO sent you a letter, reminding you that you should get a check-up?

    For my Dad, last week actually (and usually about every three months since he has diabetes) from his HMO. For me? Due to increasing costs of insurance (thanks to the government mandating my HMO cover me for stuff I don't want coverage for), I've dropped my insurance and found it cheaper to pay my own way. Even with that, I've gotten post cards from my doctor, dentist and ophthalmologist within the last 6 months advising me to make an appointment (the latter two for my dad as well). Maybe people should pick better doctors if their doctors don't care about them? I'm also not sure I want my government knowing my medical history, especially if I want to be critical of that government. Ok, I know I don't want my government knowing anything about my medical history (which, IMO, is my most private information).

    t's more of a thing of altruism I think. You may never understand me, because we see different things. Let me see if I can explain what I think: you are afraid of giving power to the government, because they will come back later to expect something from you. I see it more, you may say idealistically, but well, I think the government is the PEOPLE. The government gives me things (health, whatever), and it expects me to pay taxes, and nothing else. You too are afraid of your government, because of the way you think (warning: I'm not saying it's wrong, I just say I think different): you always expect something in return, and you think everyone else also expects something in return. Well, I think the government is more harmless than a big corporation. Sure, a huge government monopolizing everything is not healthier either.

    Don't you see that's exactly the problem? Government is made of people. People are fallible whether they are part of a business or a government. I have a choice to not use a business that I dislike and go elsewhere, I don't have a choice for a different government when mine gives my personal info to an intern to take home, who then loses it, gets access to my FBI records illegally, or gives a political contributor hundreds of millions of dollars in workers' compensation funds to use as a hedge fund. Government is potentially MORE harmful because it has powers that no business can ever have.

    Do I hate big corporations? Certainly not, I try to avoid them whenever I can, because you give them more power if you buy things from them. But obviously there are certain things, huge things, that can't be paid by small companies: A large scale network, like the phone, cable, well those are examples of things that can't be done by small companies.

    The more you use a government, the more power you give them. The more you invite them into your life, the more control they will have over your life. I can fire my phone company, my satellite company or even my mortgage company if they start pissing me off. I can't fire my government quite so easily. Look at the current national debt in the US. We could fire everyone tomorrow who refuses to spend money only on eliminating the debt and without a red cent going anywhere else, it will still take years to get rid of it. That's a best case scenario. In all reality, we'll be burdened with that debt for my entire lifetime.

    What? Are you on crack or what? That money actually help build the iron curtain. The USSR wasn't as bad as you and I were told it was. If they were poor it was only because you provoked them, you made them spend more and more in weapons and military. If you weren't there to bother them, they MIGHT have been a happy communist country, a

  107. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offense, but your argument is a bit misleading. I'm from the United States and I've lived in Argentina. I know that that it's not 'paradise'. Yes, you do have certain important state run institutions, but, overall, your country has gone (way) down hill since Peron and the 'socialization' of the country (according to history books at least). Yes, you do have free education but many people never complete degrees because they don't have the money to cover expenses while they study. Yes, you do have free medical, but the facilities are run down, the lines are long and the service is only decent (I've been, I've experienced it first hand). Combine that with the fact that your politicians and police force are much more corrupt, that wages are much lower, that politically the country is much less stable (riots every other week), and eh, its hard to claim that Americans are really that far 'off track' or that Argentines are somehow the model that should be followed.

    Although, I agree 100% that if we (the US) stopped buying arms and used the money for health & education, we'd be much better off.

  108. You want to know how ridiculous it is ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me tell you my story. I had to go to south america and there was no direct flight. So I ahd to land in the US. Well the funny things is, apparantly I needed a visa because I land at some airport in the US jsut to go on to the next country. I mean don't they have special corridor for people which don't stan the country and have an onward flight outside the US ? Well to continue I needed a visa. When I told the clerk at the US consulat he told me I needed a kind of business visa. But I have no freaking business in the US, I asked him why I could not get a tourist visa. But he was adamanet. After that I asked him how long it would takes. Then he went on and spoke about checking stuff and so on. I came back crestfallen to my firm. They told me "no worry". I don't know what they did but apparently they made a few phone call, sent me with a letter. 1 or 2 weeks later I had a 10 year B visa.

    Morality :
    1) the US apparentely require business visa for all sort of kind of reason nobody in his right mind require a visa.
    2) don't try to get one as individual, let your firm do it
    3) next time I have to stay only a few day for whatever reason and I am not paid on the premise, then I will DOWNRIGHT FUCKING LIE that I am a tourist.

  109. My horse is just fine by Rix · · Score: 1

    You're rather ignorant, though.

    Kuwait (not a democracy, by the way) drilled diagonal wells into Iraq's oil fields. Iraq signaled its intention to defend those oil fields via diplomatic channels to the US, and the US approved of them. So yes, Gulf War 1.0 was quite random and uncalled for.

    1. Re:My horse is just fine by Graff · · Score: 1

      Kuwait (not a democracy, by the way) drilled diagonal wells into Iraq's oil fields. No, Iraq CLAIMED that Kuwait was drilling diagonal wells and they used that as one of the reasons for their assault on Kuwait. As far as I've seen there was never any further substantiation of that claim.

      In any case there was no need for Iraq to invade another country over this issue. The proper thing to do would be to use an international body such as the United Nations to negotiate the issue. By starting a war Iraq opened itself up for the United Nations to intervene on the side of Kuwait instead of on the side of Iraq.

      You are correct though, the first Gulf War was completely uncalled for. It's too bad that Iraq didn't think that way before they embarked upon a military solution.

      As for the name calling, do you think that you can make your argument stronger by using ad hominem attacks? You might want to rethink that strategy, it only ends up making you look foolish.
  110. Just came back from Bulgaria... by DimGeo · · Score: 1

    Man, I had forgotten what it feels to not care what someone might do to you or whatever. Just do what you want, and chances are nobody will mind it. It has a dark side, too, drivers usually speed up when you try to cross in front of them. You know, the stronger one wins. Oh, and there's never enough money for everything, but anyways... If you haven't yet, try it. If you have the guts. And the women... Damn, I miss home...

  111. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Phleg · · Score: 1

    Even moreso, illegal immigrants are afraid of _any_ attention from the U.S. government. The IRS has routinely taken the stand that they don't care whether or not you're legally able to work here, as long as they get their money. The net result is that rather than go out of their way to find potentially questionable deductions from their taxes, they take fewer deductions than average.

    --
    No comment.
  112. Happening in other fields as well by smeek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    About a month ago, some of my coworkers attended a conference on molecular spectroscopy in the US. One of the scheduled talks there was canceled because the speaker was denied entry to the US. Apparently, when the border control asked him about his profession, he said that he's an "atomic physicist".

    I think if this sort of thing continues, more and more conference organizers will simply opt to hold their conferences in countries that are a bit more free.

  113. It's a big problem for all sorts of conferences by ZWithaPGGB · · Score: 0

    Especially since the US considers anyone not from NATO/SATO a potential terrorist.

    But hey, lots of /. ers and ACLU types want to give the same government that demonstrated this little lack of common sense more power.
    ,br> Remember: The opposition will have that power sooner or later, and the guy who enforces it is, at best just trying to make a living, at worst easily corruptible.

    Actually, on the last point, if this had happened in Lat-Am, a few $$ would have made it all OK.

  114. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by Hemogoblin · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, I realize that exception exists. However, I don't think that applies in this case.

    I'll give you an example of "training services": A large insurance company in Canada decides to implement service oriented architecture. They contract a consultant from the USA to come up to the company and give a few training sessions to the IT department. In this case, they would have to apply for a work permit.

    I'm not really familiar with how Blackhat works, but assuming Blackhat is just a regular conference where members of the public attend on their own, then I don't see why a speaker would require a work permit to speak at the event (if it was held in Canada).

  115. H1B1 regulations and lectures... by mikelang · · Score: 1

    I thought that work regulations do not concern lectures and short trainings? And least it is how it seemed to work in most civilized countries... :-)

  116. Don't Go by Tom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Halvar, seriously: Don't go to the US anymore.

    I've avoided them ever since DeCSS (I was a named defendant) and I don't plan to change that. As I see it, for a foreign national in the computer security business, pretty much anything you do while, before or potentially-might-do-after your trip can result in them locking you up indefinitely.

    And the real horror is: A couple years ago, people even on /. would've labeled me paranoid and anti-american for that statement. Today, I fear, most will agree and some will post details of the relevant laws.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:Don't Go by Library+Spoff · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm not sure what's cooler -
      The 3 digit /. Id or the fact you were a named defendant in the DeCSS debunkle!

      I bow to you sir! :)

      --
      Acid House saves Souls
    2. Re:Don't Go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And most impressive of all, he codes and runs Battlemaster!

  117. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by badfish99 · · Score: 1

    Yes, the border with Eire has never had passport checks. Oddly enough, this situation persisted all through the "troubles", when terrorists were regularly travelling from Ireland to the UK and blowing things up. Yet the current situation, where UK citizens are rebelling against their own government and blowing things up, is being used as an excuse for tighter border controls.

  118. It's time europe will do the same to US citizens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's time we europeans do the same to americans coming in our country. they treath us all as potential terrorists or a security issue.
    Let's start retaliante in the same way to them.
    Starting fingerprinting them (as brazil already do) and requiring this new passport that they require us for entering in their "land of freedom".
    Let's asking them the same informations (and db them) they require from foregneirs to enter in their country.
    Let's send them back to their land since their are coming from a country that is accountable for international instability.

  119. On the subject of home schooling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might want to consult the grandfather of all things free:
    J.S.Mills, 'On liberty'.
    There you'll find all the good reasons for _not_ allowing parents to indoctrinate their kids.
    The foremost of these is: Ensure the freedom of _all_ people, including the kids.
    No human shall be 'indoctrinated', and the only way to ensure this is to have a public education system.
    Ideally without political meddling, corporate 'sponsorship' and the like. Though I have to admit, we're far from that.
    But it's still better than to allow every christian fundamentalist/creationist to 'educate' his children about safer sex, gay marriage, free will, biology and the like - and we've got plenty of those, though they've learned to coexist with others after we fought for 30 years ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/30_years_war ).

    Of course you're not 'one of those'. But how shall we tell the difference?

    1. Re:On the subject of home schooling by bmajik · · Score: 1

      I think you overstate Mill's interest in true freedom. As near as I can tell, free market and individual liberty are instruments for advanacing society, which is his ultimate purpose, and where those mechanisms are not sufficient or optimal, he is happy to dispense with them unceremoniously. Nevermind that by the time of his death, much of his position could be called outright socialism. While the quote he gets attention for (over ones self, the individual reigns supreme, roughly) is indeed a good one, obviously that's not the entirety of his message.

      Mill himself was not publicly educated, and infact, given the hardship he endured from his child education, one wonders if he's got a bit of a reactinoary criticism of home school, which a the time, was the norm, while public education was something entirely less common.

      Irrespective of Mill's opinion, the overwhelming body of evidence in the US is that homeschooling has nothing but significant advanatages for the students it produces.

      Finally, on your point of indoctrination. Indoctrination by the state of the masses (i.e. public education) must necessarily be worse than indoctrination of an individual or two by one "errant" family members. I see no intrinsic value in limiting fundamentalist christians teaching their own children. That you assume public education would completely defeat fundamentalist indoctrination suggests that you have an irrational fear of Christians, as opposed to any real understanding of their concerns, and that you overstate the effectiveness of public education.

      Your allusion to the 30 years war being a result of Christian fundamentalist home schooling is... curious. Public education was non-existant in much of the US until the early 1900s, and we certainly had more religious denominations intermigling here than centrla Europe did. Why was the US not destroyed by religiously motivated civil war?

      In any case, it is precisely because I was publicly educated that I am adamant that I have legally protected alternatives for my own child. Not because I was shrouded in some sort of religious ignorance (far from it, infact).

      A student of history is well advised to be fearful of religious fundamentalism and where it may lead. A wiser student of history is even better advised to be even more fearful of state fundamentalism and power, and where it ALWAYS leads.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    2. Re:On the subject of home schooling by alexburke · · Score: 1

      Why was the US not destroyed by religiously motivated civil war?
      Is that not what's occurring now?
    3. Re:On the subject of home schooling by bmajik · · Score: 1

      Is that not what's occurring now?


      Unless you're referring to a slow war of attrition against civil liberties and the constitution by CAIR and other pro-radical Islam agencies here in the US, then, no, I'd say nothing of the sort is happening.

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
  120. Re:Well... I don't want to _live_ in the US anymor by jrumney · · Score: 1

    Me? I'd like more guns, fewer laws

    Try Somalia, or Nigeria or somewhere like that, then. Seriously, do you think more guns and fewer laws makes a good place to live?

  121. Well, yes, CIVILISED countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean countries where the laws are valid for all, where decisions are taken in a true democratic fashion, where elections can be trusted and where even the top people go to jail if they lie instead of exempting themselves from over 250 or so?

    That's not the US then, it starts to look more and more like a SPOE (Single Point Of Evil - vs Axis thereof). Disappointing for a nation with so much capability to do good..

    1. Re:Well, yes, CIVILISED countries by mikelang · · Score: 1

      "Disappointing for a nation with so much capability to do good.." -- I agree with every word of your sentence.

  122. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by JulianMB · · Score: 1

    Sorry man, Spanish is a language spoken in Spain a country located in Europe, one of the ten most developed countries in the world.

    Hispans is the correct word if you want refer to Spanish speakers who lives in central and south America, they are a mix of native people and Spanish citizens in the American conquest a lot of years ago.

    It's like say to an American native apache he is English.

  123. Quotas. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    Why not let him fix the technical flaw making the contract with his company?



    I would suspect that immigrations has quotas of how many people they need to reject. If they haven't reached their quota yet, then anyone who doesn't have his papers correct the first time is fair game.

  124. Re:Hurrah! WTF? H1B? by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

    There is something fundamentally wrong with this picture! This fellow was to come for a presentation, not to STEAL JOBS. Germans don't come to STEAL JOBS. They have a better quality of life than we Yankees. We all know who gets the H1B's. We all know who comes to STEAL JOBS. Can't you all hear George Harrison playing in the background? We can't have any violation of stereotypes for that would lead to unacceptable chaos. Those customs agents must have failed Ethnocentrism 101. Send them back to screwel!

    --
    Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  125. My own experience with the US "Visit" Program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I planned to attend a scientific conference @ National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Green bank, WV a couple of months ago, and I was granted my visa on the same day which was a pleasant surprise since it usually takes a couple of weeks for Kuwaitis to get the visitors visa. I had everything prepared, the invitation letter from the conference folks, my hotel reservations..etc. I even printed my conference paper and kept with me at all times in case someone asks!

    So once I arrive the airport and go to the passport counters, I'm told that my address is not valid, as I need a 'street address'. But there was no 'street' address per se for NRAO, it was a cross of two highways, and the address given contained a PO Box number from the conference folks. So I was asked to correct the address, but I cannot use my cellphone, there are no pay phones around! How am I suppose to contact the conference folks to get more information? Eventually, we had to put the hotel address that we planned to stay in for a day in VA before leaving to WV. The officer at the counter asked us why we were late in filling the I-94 application, so I explained to him what happened, and then I do to go through what is euphemistically called 'Special Registration Procedure'.

    It involved waiting for 3 hours in the airport, then meeting another officer, get asked the same questions again, and have the visa in my passport marked with something so that every time I enter an airport, we almost get strip search. We also had to collect residence hall receipts, receipt from the conference so we can prove that we did attend the conference on our 'exit interview' which if we don't do, we'll be refused future entry to the US.
    We didn't have problems in our exist interview, and I felt relived when I finally entered the airplane. It almost feel like being on parole or something. Having been through all of that, I don't think I'll be visiting the US anytime soon.

  126. Einstein by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am sure am glad they didn't send Einstein back to Germany because he forgot to bring form Q-877 with him from the motherland.

  127. un... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't that the guy o gona "show" some nice little/big tricks on some nice little/big O.S and gadgets..
    maybe...

  128. CLEARLY A FACTUAL REPORTING ERROR!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was certainly denined entry for not having a "B-1" visa (Not H-1B). Sounds like he attempted to enter on a "B-2" (Tourist) visa.

  129. OMG! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Mr Nmap! LOL!

  130. GOOD! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its about time it becomes a little more difficult to get into this country. Its no secret about the visas. Who cares if he's black hat...he's coming in from outside and he's got to play fair like all the rest of em...terrorist or not. Get in line Einstein!

  131. Serious Matter by SloWave · · Score: 1

    This is a very serious matter for the technical and scientific community. A lot of us travel internationally to attend technical conferences with little or no customs hassles. Now other countries will probably retaliate by requiring special visas for US citizens to attend conferences in their countries. This is going to curtail a lot of this travel for US citizens. Just another example of the US becoming more isolated and further behind than the rest of the world. Thanks a lot George Bush.

  132. Re:Why would an international conference be in the by eli+pabst · · Score: 1

    A large component of the Blackhat conference is the training sessions. In fact the name of the conference itself is Blackhat "USA 2007 Briefings & Training". It was very likely to be prominently displayed on the actual contract he showed the Immigration officer, so I don't think it would be much of a leap for an American (or Canadian) immigration officer to inquire if he was doing any training which, depending on how he answered, could make that clause apply and make him non-except.

  133. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by dippitydoo · · Score: 1

    This was a very interesting thread to read. I must say a happy medium would be great. Having come down with a chronic illness, you either have to be dirt poor, or middle upperclass. The lower-middle class is painful.

  134. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by andywebsdale · · Score: 1

    (Nice one,hjf)
    One case in point - when my sisters family travel to the US (Vermont, where they own a house) from Bermuda, one of her 3 sons ( a nine(9) year-old) is ALWAYS strip-searched, the other two are not. Its obvious to me that the idea is to make people arriving in the US feel that they could randomly be arrested for nothing, so that they are always a bit scared & do what they are told, just in case there's an error and they end up in Gitmo. I wouldn't risk going to the US if you paid me.

  135. US still #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my humble opinion, the US is the best place in the world to live if you work in the tech industry. I am a foreigner who has lived here for many years and I am very grateful for all the opportunities this country has offered me. The majority of Americans are very nice and hospitable people. The immigration laws are completely out-of-whack though. I know that first hand because of my personal experience as an immigrant and that of my friends. For instance, a couple friend of mine moved to Canada because they could not live together here in the US. They had both been living legally here for about 6 years. She was a green card holder and he was an H1-B holder. They fell in love and decided to get married without realizing that it would be impossible for them to stay together in this country. This is the case because it takes from 5 to 7 years for the spouse of a green card holder to be admitted in the US and the spouse has to wait overseas while he is in the queue. In the meantime, getting another visa to stay in the US with his wife (e.g., F1) was almost impossible since it was now understood that he had the intention of immigrating to the US to live with his wife. Hence, they sold everything and moved north of the border. A sad state of affairs indeed. However, the system is also full of loopholes. If you hire a good lawyer, he can easily work them out for you. This is unfortunate but it is the reality we live in today.

  136. What is all the fuss about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beckham and Posh got in without any problems. So, I don't see any problems with the system.

  137. Here is what I think by recoil01 · · Score: 0

    I think you should all go vote for my girlfriend in this contest: http://www.thegiantdream.com/Profile.php?ID=21 kinda NSFW ... bikini ! Thanks

  138. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If you weren't there to bother them, they MIGHT have been a happy communist country, and nothing else"

    Sorry but on this subject you sound like a fucking idiot.

    I grew up in a country which was FORCIBLY incorporated into Soviet sphere of "happiness" and in the process lost MILIONS of its citizens thanks to the insane and idiotic rulers of that "happy communistic country which was minding its own business".

    This is not about USA or your view of them ( which I don't give a fuck about ) but about the truth and memory of people who were slaughtered by the USSR.

    You are insulting me and millions of people who actually died so please shut the fuck up and mind your own business.

  139. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

    You obviously have no idea of what you are talking about.

  140. about time! by mpfife · · Score: 1
    About time the billions of my tax money finally catches someone entering the country by plane. Not like we can catch infectious TB patients...

    3 times....

  141. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    blatant racism is not only


    Care to identify what "race" Mexcians belong to?

    It's called "xenophobia", not "racism" you moron.

    And you know, a bit of xenophobia (in other words, looking out for your own) isn't a bad thing.
  142. Re:Well... I don't want to _live_ in the US anymor by gatesvp · · Score: 1

    No, no, the "hate crimes" thing was just a misinterpretation that was spread. The key concept is "incite to violence", priests can definitely voice their malcontent about homosexuals in the church or in general, you just can't tell your parishioners to kill, beat, maim or verbally abuse homosexuals. But this is pretty much the same everywhere, you can't go walking around telling people that "Arabs are bad" and that we "should jail them all", but you're not really allowed to say that anywhere in the western world.

    As to the "blank media tax", it only applies to CDs (which means that DVD+-R are actually cheaper than CD-R :), but it's also helped keep the MAFIAA at bay. P2P "services" are not really in violation of the law here (AFAIK & for now). In one landmark case, the judge basically said "You can't nail this person for stealing music, they paid the blank media tax so they're allowed to grab this music and burn it on to a CD, that's what they paid the tax for."

    As to the women, hey, beautiful women are everywhere :) I would personally cast my vote for Winnipeg, which is best described as a big city (750k) with a small town mentality. Filled with lots of humble, hard-working people, the women tend to follow this trend, so they're not just beautiful, they're actually approachable ;) (guess where I met my fiancé?)

  143. what a loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me get this straight: he's upset because he's been entering the country illegally for 6 years and finally got caught?

  144. Interesting by bmajik · · Score: 1

    Winnipeg is a 3hr drive for me. What should I check out if I come to visit for an afternoon?

    --
    My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    1. Re:Interesting by gatesvp · · Score: 1

      North Dakotan, eh?

      Winnipeg is just big enough to have one of everything. The Royal Winnipeg Ballet (RWB) is second only to the Canadian National Ballet and Winnipeg has Symphony Orchestra (WSO) as well. If you like theatre there are multiple companies including the MTC (Manitoba Theatre Centre), which also has a "lower-cost" venue called MTC Warehouse. There's also the Praire Theatre Exchange and a company that runs theatre targetted at kids. I say "low-cost" as top tickets to most of these events do not exceed $100 CDN and great tickets can be had in the $50-60 range.

      If you like night life and clubbing most of the clubs are "teeny bars" (18-21) and are owned by the CanadInns hotel chain (unless you're 18-24, I would avoid these). Bars in the Exchange District (downtown, just North of Portage and Main) are generally higher end and better behaved. Cover is generally $5 or less and drinks range from a minimum $2.25 on special to $5-6 at the "high-end" clubs. We have some relatively strict laws in terms of pitchers and maximum drinks, so you can't order yourself a pitcher, nor can you order yourself 8 shots unless you have friends around as "targets" for the drinks :). Worth knowing if you're a drinker. If you are planning on clubbing, my suggestion would be Coyote's night club (on Pembina). They have live bands on weekends, a great 20-something crowd and an outdoor patio.

      You North Dakotans have the Alerus Centre, but Winnipeggers have the recently opened MTS Centre, right downtown. The MTS Centre is one of the top 20 venues in North America, so pretty much every big show with an NA tour stops by Winnipeg (!). Winnipeggers have been starved of big shows for so long that they're selling them out quite regularly too. Last year they hosted a Raptor's pre-season game, and they host the AHL hockey team the Manitoba Moose. Downtown used to a be a hole, but between the Exchange District and the MTS centre the place is now buzzing pretty constantly.

      There are tons of hotels walking distance to all of these places (theatres, Exchange, MTS centre all within a few square miles) and buses run to/from downtown until late.

      If you've never seen a CFL game (yeah Canadian Football!) then it's worth checking out the Blue Bombers play at the stadium. Individual tickets range from $15 to 60/seat (cheap!) and the game itself is really entertaining. The field is wider and longer including a 20-yard end-zone. It's 3 downs and 12 a side, not 4 & 11 (as you probably know) and there is no "fair catch" rule. Instead there's always a return but the defense must provide 5 yards when the ball is picked up. For football fans it basically means that there are more changes of possession and way more scoring opportunities and games don't get "locked-up" in the 4th quarter. The talent pool is obviously smaller, but I've argued that the game is inherently more exciting (worth a watch at least).

      In the summer we also have the Goldeyes baseball team that plays at "The Fishbowl" (CanWest Global Park), which was just built a few years ago. It's obviously not Major League, but tickets range from $4 to $15 (yeah 15 behind the backstop!) and the place is well-known for its mini-donuts. It also has a great Asian restaurant attached "Hu's on First" (boo :)

      Popular festivals include FolkFest (lots of Pot and music at a campground) and Folklarama which features dozens of "cultural pavilions" with food and entertainment native to countries the world over. Le Festival du Voyageur is a franco-manitoban tradition that runs for a week in the dead of February and includes tons of activities: Ice sculptures, Maple Sugar Shack, frontiersman actors in an old fort, beard-growing contests, crafts, striped belts, pea soup and pancakes, dog-sled races and way more.

      Restaurants abound, but popular ones include: Mitzi's (best chicken wings in town!), the Royal Crown (revolving restaurant), Hy's and Bailey's (both high-end and downtown), Earl's on Main (most beautiful servers!

  145. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, there is a fucking directive regarding scaring foreign looking people.

    You have no idea what you talking about.

    US is a huge country and we are taking about about tens of thousands of generally not very well educated people, who get paid to do this stuff at airports and you are surprised shit happens ?

    There is no a fucking directive that can be given and enforced without anyone knowing about it , not with this sort of crowd that is employed at a typical airport.

    Again, you are fucking clueless how this country works and it clearly shows.

  146. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by opkool · · Score: 1

    I was mostly agreeing with you (USA healthcare system is crazy and extremely unfair), until I got to this part:

    You also say that "Spending that money brought down the Iron Curtain and freed western Europe." What? Are you on crack or what? That money actually help build the iron curtain. The USSR wasn't as bad as you and I were told it was. If they were poor it was only because you provoked them, you made them spend more and more in weapons and military

    Maybe you need to read more into 20th century history from very recent historians (read: not from the 80s nor 90s).

    The USSR was worst than everybody thought, and we were several times very close to KYABB (kiss your behind bye-bye). We misscounted how many ICBMs they had, we disdained their modern aircraft (Su-27, Mig-29 and all that generation were extremely good machines).

    But thanks to the cold war, the West (not only the USA) drove USSR economy to the ground. Maybe too fast. If instead of Mikhail Gorbatxev the USSR had elected a different guy, there was a fat chance that USSR would have invaded western Europe as a way to improve their economy.

    And with the red army rolling, in 7 days they could easily arrive to south of France. Even without nukes.

    So there. Reagan saved us all. Even if you don't like Reaganomics. And that Peace made possible Clinton and the golden years (golden years wasted by the Bush Jr years, but I disgress).

    Peace

  147. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by hjf · · Score: 1

    That's what I said. Cold war drove the USSR's economy to hell, because of the US constantly picking on the USSR. If the US didn't do that, I don't think they would have had such a powerful Red Army (they grew exponentially during the cold war, not before that). And because of that, they might have had a better economy, without a need to attack either France or anyone in the West.

    Look at china now. They are communists, but they never hurt anyone (agreed, except a few neighbors), they never tried to expaind their evil red empire all over the world. That's what I think it would have been with the USSR. But the USSR was too near from the Masters of the Universe® (the US), and their Super Friends® (UK, France, Germany...).

    But China is under US control now, economically. The US have a huge debt with China. If some day China tries something weird... the US just has to push a few buttons an drive China's economy to hell. No need for WMDs.

  148. The law is an ass. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before the World Wars were used as an excuse to implement totalitarian control of all human movement across imaginary boundaries, we didn't have any more espionage or terrorism than we do now.

    It annoys me that the government uses my money to create borders that I do not want. Let everyone in, I say, or give the damn land back to the Indians.

  149. Re:Meanwhile.. Walmart is in Spanish by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    But China is under US control now, economically.

    Wag the dog.

  150. Needs more fixin' by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
    The current administration of the United States has made "fighting terrorism" their only priority.

    The current administration of the United States has made claiming to be "fighting terrorism" their only priority.

    There. A little bit closer to reality.