Slashdot Mirror


Ask Rob Malda

We last interviewed CmdrTaco, along with Hemos, in January 2000. Slashdot's 10th anniversary seems like a good time to put Rob back on the hot seat. He's older now and married, his former hobby site now has well over one million registered user IDs, and Linux has gone from "upstart" operating system to a normal part of the IT landscape. So ask away, one question per post. Expect to see answers to at least 10 of the highest-moderated questions next week. And if you miss your chance to participate in this interview, don't worry. We'll probably do another one with CmdrTaco sometime between 2014 and 2017. CT: Also the clock is ticking if you want to sign up for a Slashdot 10-Year Anniversary party if you want a T-Shirt or a shot at the $1k ThinkGeek gift certificate.

405 comments

  1. Silly Question by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I assume that through the ether you have met Kevin Rose, but do you two get along or is it pistols at dawn?

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Silly Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it true that Zonk is your evil alter ego (as seen in Dr. Malda and Mr. Zonk) ?

    2. Re:Silly Question by mqduck · · Score: 1

      "Get along or pistols at dawn." I like it.

      --
      Property is theft.
    3. Re:Silly Question by MoriaOrc · · Score: 1

      Just thought I'd point out he was on The Screen Savers when Kevin Rose was the host (in 2004 according to Google). I'm sure he at least exchanged a death-stare with his rival-to-be, since Digg was somewhere between not announced and "started yesterday" at that point. It was founded the same month as the interview according to Wikipedia (so it must be true...).

    4. Re:Silly Question by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      I've just sent the Discussion2 slider all the way to the top and marvelled at the quality of what I read.
      (I normally leave it at -1, but wondered how you would view it)

      I think its a really good way to view discussions, you should be proud of it.

      Are there any more improvements in the pipeline?

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:Silly Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dear Mr. CmdrTaco,

      When will you fire Zonk?

      -Your Loving Slashdot Community

    6. Re:Silly Question by macshit · · Score: 1

      I assume that through the ether you have met Kevin Rose, but do you two get along or is it pistols at dawn?

      It seems pretty obvious they've got an amicable agreement worked out: Slashdot gets all the freaks, and Digg gets all the morons.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
  2. Active users? by BWJones · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Rob,

    Q: How many of those one million registered user IDs are active?

    Explanation: I have seen a fair number of folks that have defected to other platforms/communities to find resources or tools that Slashdot does not provide. I've continued to hang around as I appreciate what Slashdot has to offer, but are there any plans to change anything?

    Oh, and congratulations on 10 years.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Active users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And how many subscribers?

    2. Re:Active users? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      I see more and more of the people with UIDs much higher than mine, which is quite high, and I only see people with 3, 4, or 5 digit UIDs only comment when someone says "You must be new here."

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:Active users? by Samus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Must... resist replying to... "You must be new here" comment... Ahh damn you got me.

      I've never been a very active poster but every now and then go through phases. I think most of us with the low uids have moved into positions where we don't have as much time to post anymore. And of course others have just moved on from /. I still make it my homepage on most of the systems I use regularly and so am an active reader just not poster.

      --
      In Republican America phones tap you.
    4. Re:Active users? by tarp · · Score: 1

      Compared to you, I *am* new here.

    5. Re:Active users? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I have at least 4 user IDs from the last 10 years. I tend to lose track of silly things like web board logins.

    6. Re:Active users? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Rob,

      Q: How many of those one million registered user IDs are active?

      Explanation: I have seen a fair number of folks that have defected to other platforms/communities to find resources or tools that Slashdot does not provide. I've continued to hang around as I appreciate what Slashdot has to offer, but are there any plans to change anything?

      Oh, and congratulations on 10 years. I would love to see 2 years graphic of active user ids. I think many people went to slashdot copies and they came back when they figured the horrible "Web 2.0" PR company, paid "Blogger" abuse in action on these places which I won't name but all can guess.

      I think the chart would be interesting for that.

    7. Re:Active users? by transiit · · Score: 1

      The way I recall it, slashdot didn't require user accounts at first for posting as something other than anonymous coward.

      So after spending several months getting us all riled up about privacy, the user account system went from voluntary to mandatory.

      I probably could've had a lower UID, just as there are many more things worth caring about than the cardinal value of one's UID. =)

      -transiit

    8. Re:Active users? by transiit · · Score: 1

      your, punctuation! makes? it "hard" to understand: your point.

      Are you picking on Web 2.0 companies? Are you complaining about Google (who owns the service formerly known as Blogger)? Are you nay-saying the companies such as Gawker that have blog networks of paid stooges that'll write entries about whatever the flavor of the month is?

      No, really, I don't get it.

    9. Re:Active users? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I am all for Web 2.0 or even proposed stuff to Web 3.0 , I am against idiotic PR schemes abusing the web 2.0 technologies/fashion.

      So yes, I am picking on Web 2.0 companies and Google doing nothing against the massive blog abuse (as usual) is also on my target list.

      When you take Slashdot copies serious and watch them for 2-3 days, you can figure a real horrible level of abuse and trickery going on. I am sure people who were supporting them as a highly dynamic alternatives all gave up or soon give up.

      The paid blog etc. stuff even made into Slashdot in couple of stories as far as I saw, I am just trying to alert Slashdot to keep things way they are and don't try to race with some teen "fanboy" heavens as Slashdot, on 10th year.

    10. Re:Active users? by thogard · · Score: 1

      I think most of us with the low uids have moved into positions where we don't have as much time to post anymore.

      I think it has more to do with there being no "moron" moderation tag. There used to be a few clued in people in most discussions but now there will almost always be a +5 rated off topic discussion about something else.

    11. Re:Active users? by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      And I am even newer than you

  3. God Smack Your Ass !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why Taco?

  4. Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by SIIHP · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, that was a little antagonistic, but in all seriousness, why do you allow the kind of unprofessional editing that Kdawson engages in?

    --
    I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
    1. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by deftcoder · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's amazing how poor of an editor he is, considering the fact that he has a degree in English! (check his personal site)

      --
      Peace sells, but who's buying?
    2. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by SIIHP · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "Also, what do you plan to do about the obnoxious fuckwitted flame-baiting bastards "

      He lets you post AC, isn't that enough?

      --
      I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
    3. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by moderatorrater · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I also have problems with some of the editing that happens on the site. While it's not consistent, it seems like at least once a day, either Zonk or kdawson post an article that is highly inflammatory and represents the article poorly (so badly that it looks like they're blatantly lying about what the article says). Some of the complaining that goes on isn't warranted, but a lot of the times they have a real point.

    4. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you prevent editors from engaging in moderation abuse? And what exactly happened to cause the unusual down-moderation of the 'first Slashdot troll post investigation' thread?

    5. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Heck, hire me. I have no experience whatsoever and am fully confident I could do a much better job.

    6. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by EggyToast · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the bigger question is why these (and other) editors love to link to blogs aggregating other blogs posting about articles talking about news, rather than just the original news reports.

    7. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      I think the bigger question is why these (and other) editors love to link to blogs aggregating other blogs posting about articles talking about news, rather than just the original news reports.

      Q: Why isn't this modded up to 6?

      My fav is when fark links to slashdot links to web log links to drudge links to a network site reporting on a story from the print media.

    8. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you really need to ask? Inflammatory headlines cause flamewars. Flamewars cause page hits. Page hits sell ads.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, but as a corollary, what percentage of regular /. readers have just blocked kdawson from the front page? A few weeks ago, I realised that every kdawson story I had read was either factually incorrect, or just posted as flamebait. I don't see any point in reading the drivel he posts, and so I just blocked his stories from the front page. Since then, the signal to noise ratio has shot up, but the amount of time I've spent reading Slashdot has dropped (and, since I don't engage in ad blocking, the revenue from my participation).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      It's the submitters that link to weird places. The editors probably just don't bother most of the time, it's "good enough".

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    11. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by jerkface · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is definitely much less annoying now that I ignore kdawson posts. On a side note, the best /. editor ever was Simoniker! Is there some way we can get him back? I'll offer to pay his salary.

    12. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      This is /.. Does anyone see the ads?

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    13. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      My best guess is that the aggregating blogs (ie. Boing Boing) have a lot more bandwidth. Likewise, I'm sure that the editors don't want to be accused of plagiarism. If he got the idea for the story for another blog, he should link back to it -- it really *is* the ethical thing to do.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    14. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      My take on it is: Even if Rob hated the way KDawson engages the Slashdot public it does pull in visitors.

      Not to flame Taco as it is but when it comes right down to it Slashdot is a business that he pulls a paycheck from. Even if he wanted to make this a strictly tech-oriented site it would suffer for it.

      Take a look around sometime. Take a look at what kind of articles people are most likely to post to. You see where the traffic comes form. Most of the strictly scientific/tech articles get little traffic and those that do the traffic normally focuses around the politics of the science over the real meat of the science and technology. Most of the rest of the posts are jokes, mostly lame. The politics articles are big among readers. The Linux articles have just as much bashing of MS as they do on-topic Linux posts. Pop-Geek culture articles are also fantastic for postings. Sometimes looking at the dynamics of the posts on Slashdot and the few articles that have real technical information in them makes me wonder how many Slashdotters are really into geekdom and how many are what I call Comic Book Geeks.

      Seriously, go check sites like Devx.com or TechRepublic. There is normally some really great technical articles floating around, especially DevX. I bet you the number of visitors is substantially lower then that of Slashdot. These are articles and discussions that embrace the technology as technology, for the most part, over the politics of the technology.

      Slashdot is much too casual for serious "down to the numbers" articles to generate any real interest. KDawson's articles being fairly popular on the site are part of the culture that most users embrace.

      Again, I'm not beating on it, as much as I'm not into KDawson either, but Slashdot needs those kinds of articles. It's Rob's bread and butter regardless if he wants it to be or not.

      It's neat to be able to relate to the Slashdot culture but within itself it doesn't speak much for technology and the "geek" moniker that I hold up proud. And as much as I don't slight others for being Slashdotters it doesn't bring much to a conversation to mention a Slashdot article while discussing the more serious side of tech, IMHO.

      I guess I'm kind of rambling at this point but I think Slashdot has undergone a transition in the last few years that makes it much more casual and because of that KDawson prospers with the newer Slashdot users.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    15. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by mollymoo · · Score: 1

      Perhaps giving credit to BoingBoing via Digg via J Random Blogger for drawing attention to a news article about a press release is ethical, but it wouldn't be unethical to also link to as close to the original source as is practical.

      --
      Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
    16. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by Reaperducer · · Score: 1

      My best guess is that the aggregating blogs (ie. Boing Boing) have a lot more bandwidth.
      Boing Boing has more bandwidth than the New York Times? I don't think so. Blogspot, maybe.
      --
      -- I'm old enough to have lived through six different meanings of the word "hacker."
    17. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      Who wants to bet this is a Kdawson sock puppet post?

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    18. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by sukotto · · Score: 1

      you missed the Yoda tie-in there.

      "Page ads... lead to suffering"

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    19. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I also have problems with some of the editing that happens on the site. While it's not consistent, it seems like at least once a day, either Zonk or kdawson post an article that is highly inflammatory and represents the article poorly (so badly that it looks like they're blatantly lying about what the article says). Some of the complaining that goes on isn't warranted, but a lot of the times they have a real point. Flame article or trolling article scoop are Slasdot things and does not make me that irritated.

      I am more interested in these stories which seems like a cheap way of advertising even along with referrer in Eclipse case:
      http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/23/0019224
      That appeared on Apple section which even made professional Java developers I know confused.

      And now "Facebook gets a IM client" shamessly posted by a PR guy:
      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/05/201219

      I am afraid some people/companies is really using/abusing the time while Zonk is in charge. I am not blaming Zonk, I am blaming them.

      Another question is: If we prove there is really a Slashdot abuse in place, would there be some sort of "edit" and the banning of story submitter (e.g. PR company) openly so they will never,ever confuse slashdot with Digg again?
    20. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by Frozen+Void · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is valued by its commentary and stories are usually mediocre(for a news site),i read them usually 2-3 days before on link/blog aggregators.

    21. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by HorsePunchKid · · Score: 1

      Just banish his stories from your home page. I did. It works. It's amazing how much the signal to noise ratio increased.

      --
      Steven N. Severinghaus
    22. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bwahahahaha! Whoever modded this troll just got metamodded unfair! Ha ha jackhole!

    23. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should I have to edit the editor?

      You and all the idiots like you who suggest that are missing the point.

    24. Re:Why haven't you fired Kdawson yet? by SIIHP · · Score: 1

      I appreciate the backup, thanks.

      --
      I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
  5. Retirement by HoosierPeschke · · Score: 1

    Have you thought about what you want to do when you decide to retire from the /. admin dept or will you continue to here until your fingers fall off?

    --
    Mr. Universe: "They can't stop the signal, Mal. They can never stop the signal."
  6. Why did you turn off the new comment system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Why did you turn off the new comment system? Come on! If there was one thing I wanted to ask you it was, "What the hell are you thinking?"

    Did you not think we would complain about that abomination?

  7. Over/under by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 3

    When will the over/underrated mods be mettamodded?
    Thanks

    1. Re:Over/under by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Along those lines, "When will long time users, such as myself, who have not had mod points in *years* be given an explanation as to why they haven't seen them?"

    2. Re:Over/under by SlamMan · · Score: 0

      Ditto to that (hence the sig).

      --
      Mod point free since 2001
    3. Re:Over/under by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Along those lines, "When will long time users, such as myself, who have not had mod points in *years* be given an explanation as to why they haven't seen them?" I've only ever gotten mod points once. I figured they were just stingy with them. How often do they come up for most people?
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    4. Re:Over/under by Roofus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed! I haven't had mod points since Jan 2002. The last mod I made was on the infamous post: The first Slashdot troll post investigation. I have not had a single mod point since.

    5. Re:Over/under by novakreo · · Score: 1

      I've only ever gotten mod points once. I figured they were just stingy with them. How often do they come up for most people? Mine come up every few weeks or so, although I usually don't have time to use them.
      --
      O frabjous day! Callooh! Callay!
    6. Re:Over/under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get 5 every week or two.

      Posting anonymously to avoid karma burn from the haters.

    7. Re:Over/under by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      For me, it usually happens after a vacation. I.e. when I didn't post for a week or so.

      That's not a "hint" to shut up, that's just what happens for me. Why, I don't know. Maybe they don't want to shut up those that actually create the content here (because when you mod you can't post or your mods are moot).

      But, bluntly, I prefer to pour my drivel into /. instead of "having" to mod someone. Getting no modpoints gives me a cute excuse to post "me too" posts, saying "well, if I had modpoints, I would have modded, but so I have to..."

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Over/under by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      (posting on my newer account, haven't been using my old one)

      Have to agree - it appears that mod points are frequently given to people who ... for lack of a better word ... are not wise in their use of them.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    9. Re:Over/under by Hatta · · Score: 1

      I've read /. almost daily for years. For years I never got mod points. I started taking breaks of a few days and suddenly every week I was getting mod points. Then after a few months, and without changing any behavior on my part, they stopped. Now it seems that no matter how little or how much I post or just visit /. I get no mod points at all. Which is just as well, it's more fun to post than moderate.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:Over/under by grammar+fascist · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've only ever gotten mod points once. I figured they were just stingy with them. How often do they come up for most people?

      I get them every two weeks or so now. I didn't get them at all, even though I had excellent karma, until I metamoderated a few times.
      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    11. Re:Over/under by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      i'd say once or twice a week do i see them. sometimes i don't even notice them, tho, until the last day i've got them. then it's a mad dash to spend them.

      fwiw, when i do get positive moderation on my posts, it tends to be more funny than anything else, but i thought i read somewhere that getting modded funny doesn't carry as much weight as anything else...

    12. Re:Over/under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I get mod points every three to five days.

      What affects it? Your karma, login frequency, post-to-lurk ratio, and of course metamoderation.

      Mis-use mod points and eventually you will be called on it.

      Moderate FAIRLY and OBJECTIVELY. If someone posts a very well-reasoned, civil post mod it up even if you disagree with it. Don't use mod points to bias a discussion. Otherwise, eventually your moderations will be meta-moderated as unfair and you will not get mod points as often, or editors or full-time moderators will spot your bad mods and spank you in response.

    13. Re:Over/under by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      At the very least I get them once every two weeks... Some times I'll use all 5 points, then get 5 more a day or two later.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    14. Re:Over/under by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      I always get my mod points whenever I'm away from the computer for a while or busy enough to not browse slashdot. Always. That usually results in me not using all of them or just modding randomly so I get rid of them all in time.
      If you never take a break from slashdot try taking one and see if you get any.

      I've gotten mod points 4-8 times since I've joined. It could also be that your mods get metamodded down so you get points less often.

    15. Re:Over/under by falsified · · Score: 1

      After being a regular commenter for four or five months, I started getting mod points once every two weeks. At one point I didn't go any longer than maybe five days without points.

      Then I debunked a low-ID-number poster's BS, and after that I didn't have mod points for probably a year and a half. I started getting them again five or six months ago, and get them again once every three weeks probably.

      My theory is that they're doled out based on an extremely complicated formula, peppered with arbitrary "I don't like him/her" or "I like him!/her!"ness.

      --
      HI, MY NAME IS ISAAC.
    16. Re:Over/under by pohl · · Score: 1

      A person can grow a lot in 6 years. Is there no amnesty for those who lost mod-point status in their flaming youth?

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    17. Re:Over/under by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      I've only ever gotten mod points once. I figured they were just stingy with them. How often do they come up for most people? All the time. Hardly ever use them though.
    18. Re:Over/under by Moderatbastard · · Score: 0

      Mis-use mod points and eventually you will be called on it.
      Moderate FAIRLY and OBJECTIVELY.
      Or just use under/overrated, since these (for some reason) aren't subject to metamoderation
      --
      1/3 of jokes get modded OT. If you get the joke, mod 1 in 3 insightful/interesting/underrated to restore karma balance.
    19. Re:Over/under by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      I've seen several references to this in this story today.

      Since reminiscing seems to be the flavor of the day, I'd love to hear a breakdown of what happened in that thread. I read through it, and it looked like some editors and/or mods went a little nuts. Would be interesting to hear from Taco some of these kind of stories, where the masses seemed to turn on those in charge. What was that like, for something that started as a hobby site?

      Anyone have any links where i can read about what that troll post investigation thing was all about?

      Thanks, Taco, for a website i get paid to read. Rather, i read when i'm getting paid to do something else...

    20. Re:Over/under by evanbd · · Score: 1

      I didn't post to that, I merely applied a mod point (though somewhat late, I still felt it was worth it). I lost all mod and metamod priveleges without explanation for ~2 years (memory is vague on the exact period). They both have returned, however, and I now get mod points perhaps once a month.

    21. Re:Over/under by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I've only ever gotten mod points once. I figured they were just stingy with them. How often do they come up for most people?

      Unless you metamoderate, in my experience never as I can go many months without ever getting any even though I post a lot with generally good moderation. If I ever bother to, I usually get mod points shortly after so I'm not banned or anything. I guess the logic is that if you don't want to metamoderate, you're not interested in moderating.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    22. Re:Over/under by fallen1 · · Score: 1

      Looking back over the last couple of years, I get mod points around 1.5 times per month (sometimes 2 or 3 times a month, sometimes none, but averaging out to be almost twice a month). I don't know why exactly, but I try to post constructively and moderate the same way.

      --

      Dream as if you'll live forever.
      Live as if you'll die tomorrow.
      ~Anonymous~

    23. Re:Over/under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe your preferences have changed themselves - check under "Willing to moderate." I think this has happened to me once, or I ticked that checkbox by mistake (drowsiness?) sometime.
      Or maybe you're just too lazy to meta-moderate?

    24. Re:Over/under by autocracy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Trying to comment on that thread from memory, users of the site kept modding it up, and the /. editors kept running a "nuke" downmodding the thread. Back then, you could see how many moderations were made on an individual post. I think it went into the 5 with this particular case... definitely into the 4. Anyway, after that, anybody involved in the thread saw their mod abilities vanish, and /. changed their mod system to display moderations made as percentages instead of hard numbers. I personally yearn for being able to know if my karma is 49, 50, or -236, and being able to see a count of moderations.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    25. Re:Over/under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      About four or five years ago, idiot. Stop believing everything some other random Slashdot poster tells you.

    26. Re:Over/under by mixenmaxen · · Score: 1

      Interesting...
      I get five mod points around every two weeks.
      I don't think I am in any way special on Slashdot, exccept maybe that I tend to use half my mod points on the funny moderation.

    27. Re:Over/under by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Maybe your preferences have changed themselves - check under "Willing to moderate." I think this has happened to me once, or I ticked that checkbox by mistake (drowsiness?) sometime.
      Or maybe you're just too lazy to meta-moderate? That was under homepage of all the unexpected places and yes, it's still checked. Weird.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    28. Re:Over/under by spikeb · · Score: 1

      i've gotten them twice recently

    29. Re:Over/under by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Unless you metamoderate, in my experience never as I can go many months without ever getting any even though I post a lot with generally good moderation. If I ever bother to, I usually get mod points shortly after so I'm not banned or anything. I guess the logic is that if you don't want to metamoderate, you're not interested in moderating. I metamod semi-frequently, still no points. Weird.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    30. Re:Over/under by greenguy · · Score: 1

      I used to get them regularly every six weeks, but then one day, they stopped. That was more than two years ago.

      I mean, I'd rather comment than mod anyway, but modding would give me something to do after I fire up the crack pipe.

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    31. Re:Over/under by antdude · · Score: 1

      For me, I visit /. too much. I think CmdrTaco or someone else from the /. staff team told me that I visit /. too much to get any. Yes, I did metamoderating. I have gotten some in the past though. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    32. Re:Over/under by makomk · · Score: 1

      Yeah - there were hundreds of modpoints used on the first post in the thread alone. Of course, it looks like that information has since mysteriously vanished from the system...

    33. Re:Over/under by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      You could always do like the rest of us, ditch the low UID and get a new account. Really, the LOW UID only impresses the kind of people who don't matter anyway.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    34. Re:Over/under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Once? Count yourself lucky. I've *never* gotten mod points, even when I see my postings get them! Something must be broken.

    35. Re:Over/under by pohl · · Score: 1

      Thank you for the suggestion, but it was a broader question and not related to my own mod points.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    36. Re:Over/under by max99ted · · Score: 1

      I can second that. Once you've meta-moderated a few times you get mod points far more frequently (every two weeks sounds aboot right).

      --

      Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

    37. Re:Over/under by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      Man, you can have some of mine. I seem to get 5 a week and I really don't know what to do with them. I mean, I rarely have time to do my "due modding diligence" and actually read through all that rubbish that's under my normal threshold for the occasional gem (although I do make the rare valiant if doomed effort to do so).

    38. Re:Over/under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along those lines, "When will long time users, such as myself, who have not had mod points in *years* be given an explanation as to why they haven't seen them?"


      I have way more posts than anyone here and I have never gotten any mod points!
    39. Re:Over/under by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

      I get them every once in a while, too. Hell, I'll be honest and say that I almost never metamoderate nor do I use the mod points typically. I'm not sure who keeps granting them to me, but they can be sure that I almost never used them.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
    40. Re:Over/under by scottrocket · · Score: 1
      I've only ever gotten mod points once. I figured they were just stingy with them. How often do they come up for most people?

      Oh, about once a week...

    41. Re:Over/under by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I got them one or two times, not long after I started. Then I criticed the then darling of the editors, micheal sims, got bitchslapped and have never had them since.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    42. Re:Over/under by Inda · · Score: 1

      I get mod points once a week... The more I post, the more I get.

      But I did abuse Taco once in a thread and mysteriously lost my modding ability for months. hehe.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    43. Re:Over/under by name*censored* · · Score: 1
      I get roughly one moderator point per post..

      I don't post all that often though, considering how long I've been here (Wow only 6 digits! [/sarcasm])
      --
      Commodore64_love: I don't comprehend people who're so frightened of death that they'll bankrupt themselves to stay alive
    44. Re:Over/under by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I average about 8 M1 points a week.

      My best guess to M1?

      1. Karma.
      2. M2 every so often.
      3. By rule, never neg rep as M1.
      4. By choice, M2 most neg reps as unfair.
      5. High SNR.
      6. ????
      7. Prophet!!!

      wrt 4: You can shout and air out, but try not to scorn and scorch. Communication is not a paintball driveby on another man's ONE WAY street sign.

      wrt 5: Read more than post. Slashdot tracks. Yes. The eyes of skynet are upon you. Also, post with diligent and insightful heed. Water your mind, not some google seed. Afterall, does a mind really need? To feed? On such a weed? By the way, I think I just peed, on your weed. Eat up!

    45. Re:Over/under by illuvata · · Score: 1

      What affects it? Your karma, login frequency, post-to-lurk ratio, and of course metamoderation. I'm not so sure about these things. Karma I have no idea, mine hasn't changed for a while. However, for the rest:
      I log in about once a year, when the cookie expires.
      I sometimes don't make a single post for months, despite lurking quite a bit.
      I can't remember the last time I metamoderated, but it may well have been in 2006.

      I still get mod points at least once every 2 weeks, sometimes every few days. I also don't take any particular care to find deserving posts to mod up, I just continue to read normally and mod posts I happen to come across. I rarely actually use all five mod-points before they expire.
    46. Re:Over/under by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      I think they tweak it over time. I used to get them about twice a week, and then there was a few weeks where they would refresh several hours after I spent the last one. Now, I get them less than once a month.

      Why? Who knows.

      --
      Fnord.
    47. Re:Over/under by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      I've only ever gotten mod points once. I figured they were just stingy with them. How often do they come up for most people? Mine come up every few weeks or so, although I usually don't have time to use them. Ditto with mine - it would be an odd month when I didn't get mod points at least twice.
      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
  8. /. Polls by sepluv · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do the editors bet on which option will win in /. polls and are half of the votes for the CowboyNeal option actually by CowboyNeal repeatedly clicking his mouse. Inquiring minds want to know.

    --
    Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
    [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    1. Re:/. Polls by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      are half of the votes for the CowboyNeal option actually by CowboyNeal repeatedly clicking his mouse.

      Of course not! What do you think? CowboyNeal isn't like your average politician or shady businessman who'd engage in such activities to skew the polls. He's a fellow geek!

      He has a script that does that for him. :)

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:/. Polls by transiit · · Score: 1

      Parent post currently posted as "Interesting"

      Really.

      Ok, so the cowboyneal option was always posted as a gag option, and it was well known enough that people kept including it.

      If the best you have to offer this thread is to question the slashdot polling system, you'll be hard-pressed to find anyone to take you seriously.

      You probably knew that, but you were hoping for +5 Funny, anyhow, weren't you?

      Same reason why a "funny" moderation gets a maximum negative filter for me. One can only handle the same tired jokes so often.

  9. Do it again by Rinisari · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you were to redo Slashdot all over again, what would you change? I'm not just talking Slash, I'm talking the entire thing.

    1. Re:Do it again by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      create a karma threshold where 0 or lower disables the ability to make anonymous posts? limit the number of anonymous posts according to the anonymous author's karma so higher karma= more trusted while lower karma= less time to post cowardly. those who consistently make good posts get to hide under anonymous coward more than those who post meaningless rants. encourage good behavior instead of feeding the trolls. they troll in part because there are no relevant consequences. maybe even a system where karma "rots" over time, if you don't post for a year for example, your karma would have decayed back to the default. the more you post insightful commentary the better your karma looks.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  10. Why has /. turned into Digg? by DAldredge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why has the number of technical articles dropped so much over the years? IOW - why are you trying to turn /. into Digg?

    1. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by debilo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why has the number of technical articles dropped so much over the years? IOW - why are you trying to turn /. into Digg?
      Oh, come on. Slashdot may suck at times, but Digg is an utter mess. The majority of the stories posted on the front page of Digg usually resembles an exclamation mark orgy, whoever posts the most wins automatically. The comment system is irritating at best, and really useful comments are rare. Someone once said that he reads Digg for the stories, and Slashdot for the comments. Basically, Digg is Fark.com without the humor, and Slashdot is lightyears away from turning into Digg.
    2. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well you were there from early on. I got in when it was just starting to catch on... The problem is when more people use the site the average IQ of the site moves to the average IQ of the world. Slashdot users are no longer smarter then the average internet user they are just the same the only difference is they are somewhat interested in technology. But that happened when things get popular they try to move to the common ground. Technical Specs and articles have been replaced with cool case mods, to technical politics. A story about Microsoft abuse and attempt to get a government contract will get more interest then say the technical specs of the newest iPod, or how to hack your iPhone to install Linux on it. Having people posting on Slashdot improves impressions of adds, thus increased revenue, and it gets people coming back to continue their rants. If there is an article that is politically charged (GPL2 vs. GPL3 or Linus vs. RMS) and people are posting back and forth arguing their points and more adds get displayed to their screen, assuming they haven't blocked the adds or are not a subscriber. So in short more money is out there to lower the technical stuff and make it more general base.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    3. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot users are no longer smarter then the average internet user they are just the same the only difference is they are somewhat interested in technology. I think you just broke my irony meter!
    4. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      To bad your story on how to connect slashdot page and detect irony got rejected for the latest story about patents. It would be a cool read.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone once said that he reads Digg for the stories, and Slashdot for the comments.

      Exactly. In other words, Digg is to Playboy as Slashdot is to Penthouse (circa 1990 in-an-old-school-brown-paper-bag sort-of-way). Finding good comments on Digg is like trying to find the good bits in Playboy: on the cover and "somewhere in the middle." Not to mention Penthouse subscribers always seemed to write much better letters.

    6. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by abigor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I too wonder about this. I miss the old articles about how to hack this device or how these proposed changes to language X work. All of these RIAA articles, for instance, seem to pander to teenagers, while there are very few articles for technical people anymore.

    7. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read slashdot for the bewbs. (.)(.)

    8. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by MeditationSensation · · Score: 1

      If you want to see a formerly cool site that turned into Digg, check out reddit. Well, it's not exactly like Digg. But the mindless up-voting of certain topics (ron paul, atheism, etc.) has gotten out of control. It actually made me appreciate the Slashdot editors. They don't do a perfect job, but they keep up the variety and the signal/noise ratio.

    9. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by mehgul · · Score: 1

      I don't look so much at the firehose to check, but if those stories you like don't appear as often, maybe that's because nobody submits them anymore?

    10. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by Robaato · · Score: 1

      Considering the policy changes/transparent pandering to advertisers that have happened there in the past few months, I'd say that FARK.com is now FARK.com without the humor.

    11. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by illuvata · · Score: 1

      But the audience has changed. Occasionally there are still stories about "Geek hacks toaster to run Linux" or something like that, but then the first half of the comments bitches about /. posting something so unimportant.

    12. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention NewYorkCountyLawyer's appeal to pity articles. Oh no... RIAA is suing someone even though they're on welfare or have a disease! How about a story where they sue someone despite the fact that they're a normal, healthy person making a six figure income and are knowingly downloading content they have no rights to?

    13. Re:Why has /. turned into Digg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of these RIAA articles, for instance, seem to pander to teenagers, while there are very few articles for technical people anymore. Hear, hear! The half dozen RIAA skirmish stories per day have become tedious.

  11. Any mutual "I can't belive it's ...!" moments? by gevmage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Wil Wheaton has written about meeting a famous author, I think it was Larry Niven, and being completely blown away that Niven was at least as jazzed about meeting Wil as vice versa.

    I'm sure you've met lots of folks that us normal mortals only see on TV. Anyone in particular that you were really excited to meet who hyperventilated when they realized who you were?

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
    1. Re:Any mutual "I can't belive it's ...!" moments? by Monkey · · Score: 1

      And on that note, Rob, have you ever met Wil Wheaton?

      It's always been said that the two of you sort of do look alike. If you did meet, was it like that episode of ST:TOS "The Enemy Within" where the good Kirk meets the bad Kirk? Which one of you would be the bad Kirk?

    2. Re:Any mutual "I can't belive it's ...!" moments? by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Anyone in particular that you were really excited to meet who hyperventilated when they realized who you were? And was it because of the hot grits?
    3. Re:Any mutual "I can't belive it's ...!" moments? by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      Malda wants to meet Pete Townshend, but isn't good enough at faking that he's a 13 year old boy in chatrooms.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    4. Re:Any mutual "I can't belive it's ...!" moments? by east+coast · · Score: 1

      Wil Wheaton has written about meeting a famous author, I think it was Larry Niven, and being completely blown away that Niven was at least as jazzed about meeting Wil as vice versa.

      That just goes to show what an outstanding guy Larry is. If anything Wil (no offense, Wil) should have kissed Larry's feet.

      Niven is a giant in a universe strewn with hacks and wanna-bes. He's the real deal when it comes down to science fiction. With the exception of Arthur C. Clarke, he's probably the best science fiction writer alive today.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    5. Re:Any mutual "I can't belive it's ...!" moments? by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1
      Which one of you would be the bad Kirk?

      whichever has the most facial hair at the time.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    6. Re:Any mutual "I can't belive it's ...!" moments? by gevmage · · Score: 1

      It's always been said that the two of you sort of do look alike.

      Really? I don't really think so. Wil posts photos of himself from time to time, and I've seen Rob Malda in person at Penguicon. I don't really they look much alike, except that they're both about the same height (I'm guessing) and both on the thin side.

      --
      Craig Steffen
      http://www.craigsteffen.net
  12. OMG! by Jello+B. · · Score: 4, Funny

    In the recent Wired interview, it was said that the interview was conducted over the phone, so my question is...

    Does saying "OMG!" out loud make you as much of a dork as I think it does?

    1. Re:OMG! by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does saying "OMG!" out loud make you as much of a dork as I think it does?

      ...only if you say ..."PONIES!" afterward...

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  13. What is this crazy tags thing? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Considering the FAQ hasn't been updated in almost a year, could you explain exactly what tags do these days? At one time, it seemed to be a vote-based system, now I have no idea how tags show up on articles. Frankly, since I didn't understand it and my tags didn't seem to affect anything, I gave up on using the feature.

    Could we get a definitive answer to how tags work?

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    1. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by timster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The followup question to this is: since the tagging system seems to be a complete failure even when restricted to a small subset of users, what hope remains for its future evolution? At this point, why not just shut it down and give up?

      By 'failure', I mean that the tags we see are generally ridiculously useless (like a "science" tag on a story in the Science section) or otherwise simply degenerate ("haha" seems to be the most common tag). It's hard to imagine what purpose the system would serve even if people were honest with it. Further, the idea of tagging comments as a future moderation system now seems completely horrible.

      --
      I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    2. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 1

      By 'failure', I mean that the tags we see are generally ridiculously useless (like a "science" tag on a story in the Science section) or otherwise simply degenerate ("haha" seems to be the most common tag).

      The tag thing is useless, but at least the old vote-based system was entertaining. I looked at it as a variation on the "from the [xxxx] department". Some of the tags were pretty funny sometimes.

      --
      Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
    3. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by virgil_disgr4ce · · Score: 1

      Good question. I remain pretty confused; however, I love some of the tags that show up. I do think it's an interesting way of gauging people's opinion or content of the article (no matter how wrong or flamebaity the tags are). So it's entertaining, but so far useless. It does seem like the sort of thing that would, in theory, be useful, in terms of seeing other articles that have been tagged with x. But I've never come across the actual need to do that.

      So yes, I second this question, as I would love to hear an answer.

    4. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      At this point, why not just shut it down and give up?

      I would agree that tags should just go away.

      They are web2.0ish I guess, but they simply don't apply to slashdot. I'm not saying tags or slashdot are bad, I'm just saying that they don't mix.

    5. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      since the tagging system seems to be a complete failure...

      I actually kind of like them. When I see an article slathered with "flamebait", "badsummary", "inaccurate", etc. then I have a pretty good idea that it's not worth getting worked up about and that I'll probably read its debunking a few comments down. I think that's a fairly nice service.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    6. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by Luyseyal · · Score: 2, Funny

      By 'failure', I mean that the tags we see are generally ridiculously useless (like a "science" tag on a story in the Science section) or otherwise simply degenerate ("haha" seems to be the most common tag). It's hard to imagine what purpose the system would serve even if people were honest with it. Further, the idea of tagging comments as a future moderation system now seems completely horrible.


      You mean like this very article being tagged "slashdot", possibly the most pointless tag ever?

      -l
      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    7. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Tags are amusing. They harm nothing. I don't get why so many people have a problem with them.

      --
      Property is theft.
    8. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by fbjon · · Score: 1

      Complete failure? I find them useful a lot of the time, in that they aren't actually tags, but rather one-word comments on the headline or summary. I don't see any reason to shut it down since people are evidently using it.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    9. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a problem with them because they're completely arbitrary.

      I see a set of tags like--oh, what's on the front page right now--diabeetus, viewtoakill, goodbyecalifornia, and arizonabay--and I know they're bullshit. It's not like 5000 people all decided that they would tag something "arizonabay," so I'm left to think that it's one or two people who crank these things out. That little in-joke is useless to any sort of tag reading software and takes up room on my monitor. How cute and funny and clever.

    10. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by mcmire · · Score: 1

      Exactly. You have to think about what tags are most useful for: categorizing articles so it's easy to find other articles related to them. The problem with tags on Slashdot is that they're being used as just another form of comments. Tagging an article with "yes"/"no", "elmerfudd", "linuxsucks", or "pleasetakeitwearebeggingyou" may be amusing, but it's not helpful from a search standpoint. No one will think to use the tag "elmerfudd" if they want to search for FUD, and no one will think to use "pleasetakeitwearebeggingyou"... in fact they won't think to use that at all, since I can't think of any other article it could apply to than the one it was applied to, and even if it did, would whoever added the tag in this case remember to use it again? No, I don't think so -- it isn't MEMORABLE, which is kind of what tags are supposed to be in order to work right.

      So, to recap, leave your comments about an article in ... wait for it... the COMMENTS SECTION. And make your tags memorable. Got that? Awwwwwesome.

    11. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Once again, tags don't hurt anything. In case you haven't noticed, there are serious tags along with goofy ones. Tags serve both purposes, and why the hell shouldn't they?

      --
      Property is theft.
    12. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by hansamurai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, you don't have to only tag for the community as a whole, you can also tag just for yourself.

      http://meta.slashdot.org/my/tags

      There you can see all the tags you've written and what articles they're attached to. This can be helpful just for sorting through the articles you've read and maybe your thoughts about them at the time.

    13. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by Wizworm · · Score: 1

      Exactly, I believe that a free(beer)/open system adds to the experience, and I find the tags fairly meaningful/funny most of the time

      --
      I always thought of Creationism as the Raving Right's version of the Loony Left's Anthropogenic Global Warming-brightmal
    14. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      I for one like what the tags have evolved into. I mean, they're not very useful in the strict sense, but they provide a sort of humorous running commentary on the articles. I like to check the tags for the occasional good chuckle.

    15. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by graviplana · · Score: 1

      "The followup question to this is: since the tagging system seems to be a complete failure even when restricted to a small subset of users, what hope remains for its future evolution? At this point, why not just shut it down and give up? By 'failure', I mean that the tags we see are generally ridiculously useless (like a "science" tag on a story in the Science section) or otherwise simply degenerate ("haha" seems to be the most common tag). It's hard to imagine what purpose the system would serve even if people were honest with it. Further, the idea of tagging comments as a future moderation system now seems completely horrible." I completely disagree with you on this one. Apart from the occasional ridiculous tag, I find that whomever is tagging gives me a truthful look into the article, free of a lot of bias and FUD that I find in the comments. This saves me time and actually helps the cream rise to the top. It also helps to reduce people falling into Comment Section Groupthink. Whomever is doing the current tag system - DON'T CHANGE IT AT ALL! PLEASE. It saves me time; the tags are insightful and often go against some tow the party-line-belief that may ACTUALLY PISS OFF a lot of people (The Truth Hurts) and helps to maintain /.'s relevance as a source for real news. Keep it up!

      --
      "Time is nothing; timing is everything."
    16. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      You left out the two most needed - ohnoitsroland and kdawsonsucks.

    17. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by macshit · · Score: 1

      there are serious tags along with goofy ones. Tags serve both purposes, and why the hell shouldn't they?

      Exactly.

      Tags are roughly divided into two categories: "descriptive" and "opinion", and the two sets very rarely overlap.

      For searching or categorization purposes, the descriptive tags have obvious utility (and from what I've seen, people do a reasonable job of them), and while the "opinion" tags don't help much, they also don't hurt.

      For people reading the headlines, both sets of tags are actually pretty useful for giving a very quick and rough sense of people's reactions before diving into the comments.

      I dunno why people get all up in a lather about the way tags are used, other than a sort of knee-jerk reaction to the fact that they're not exactly like the keywords in one's favorite academic journal.

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    18. Re:What is this crazy tags thing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact you're not saying very much at all, are you?

  14. Okay, I'll bite by Skyshadow · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Something I've been sort of curious about for ages:

    Can you talk a little about how you experienced some of the dotcom insanity, specifically as it unfolded here at Slashdot? For a while, it seemed like Slashdot was about to become wunderkind central -- the sale to VA, the infamous ESR post about uber-wealth, etc. I'd be interested to hear about how that experience translated from your side of the ball.

    Thanks. And nice site you got here.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:Okay, I'll bite by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 1

      Do you have a link for that ESR post?

    2. Re:Okay, I'll bite by alx5000 · · Score: 1

      And nice site you got here.

      Be a shame if anything happened to it...

      --
      My 0.02 cents
    3. Re:Okay, I'll bite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      here you go: Surprised by Wealth

    4. Re:Okay, I'll bite by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Funny

      Where is the link to his followup: "Surprised that a software company that doesn't sell software ended up with $2/share stock"...

      Oh. Right.

    5. Re:Okay, I'll bite by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      I notice that in that article link, there are no comments whatsoever. Were they deleted?

      Really, the fun thing would be to allow us to comment on Raymond's article NOW.

      I mean, VA Linux IPO/Dot.bomb/the whole shootin match. It would be a FUN discussion.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    6. Re:Okay, I'll bite by Skyshadow · · Score: 1

      This is obviously going back a ways, but I *think* this may have been one of the extremely small number of Slashdot stories to have had comments disabled.

      Which is good since, even at the time, everyone who read it was unified in thinking, "Geez, what a douchebag."

      Thinking back on it, it strikes me that this may have been pretty much the last time people really took him seriously. Here you had a guy who'd written the popular manifesto of OSS development and played a major hand in the release of the Mozilla codebase, and suddenly he just seemed to lose his credibility. He just sort of went away.

      That's how it went from my view of it, anyhow. Your mileage may vary.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    7. Re:Okay, I'll bite by jamie · · Score: 1

      No, there were comments. We've had a number of major code updates since then and we did our best to snarf in old comments from the .shtml files but we didn't always succeed.

  15. Hindsight by Raindance · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If you had to do it over again, what would you do differently?

  16. mysql vs postgres by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Without getting into a flamewar over what is a highly controversial subject, slashdot runs on mysql, and you've been quoted as saying you would do it with postgres if you could do it all again. I'm just wondering, is that true, do you still feel that way and why?

  17. any annoyed or happy /. effect stories? by gevmage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do you have any stores of annoyed sysadmins writing/phoning you and complaining that a link on Slashdot crushed their machines?

    Alternatively, anyone whose exposure on slashdot boosted their popularity/traffic enough that they could retire/change jobs/make a major job change?

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
  18. My Question for Rob Malda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why do you look like such a psycho?

    Seriously, Rob looks like he escaped from the nearest infirmary.

    Time for a better hair cut, Rob.
    (posted anonymously for obvious reasons)

    Sincerely,
    Kevin Rose

  19. Mistake by Keebler71 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    What was your biggest mistake in developing this site?

    Related follow-up/Put another way: If you could go back and do one thing differently what would you do?

    --
    "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
  20. Most-visited sites.. by B5_geek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What "Top-5" websites are in your daily/hourly must-read rotation? (Not counting RSS)

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  21. What the hell do you do all day? by Xunker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ever since GiS went away you've become a sort of man-behind-the curtain type persona, and we don't see much in the way of journal updates or news posts about Slashdot or you yoyrself much. One of the last things most of us knew about the "Real Rob Malda" was the article in Wired years ago regarding the Andover-cum-VALinux-cum-OSDN-cum-Death-keiretsu IPO.

    Just what the hell do you do all day now, anyway?

    --
    Hilary Rosen's speech was about her love of money and her desire to roll around naked in a pile of money.
    1. Re:What the hell do you do all day? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      On the topic of GiS, and I know it's a long shot, is there any chance you'll be able to bring it back in some form? I actually enjoyed having it mixed in with Bill Hick's various performances and other more or less funny material, it's great to have on in the background while coding or just screwing around with stuff. Besides, it was miles better than most of the podcasts that are floating around on the web now..

      /Mikael J

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:What the hell do you do all day? by Sciros · · Score: 1

      Probably watch Youtube.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    3. Re:What the hell do you do all day? by Thwomp · · Score: 1

      I second that emotion. No seriously, I'd like it if they became available again.

    4. Re:What the hell do you do all day? by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      Am I hearing this right?

      This is SlashNation.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  22. Re:The question everyone wants to ask by debilo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why does Zonk still have a job?
    He doesn't. He's a Slashdot editor.

  23. What is your actual job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What do you actually do? If someone were to follow you to work every day for a month, what would they see you spend your time doing?

    1. Re:What is your actual job? by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

      He burns wads of cash on the fires that he starts in slashdotted servers. What else would he do?

    2. Re:What is your actual job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If someone were to follow you to work every day for a month, what would they see you spend your time doing? They don't allow cameras in the bathroom. Now please excuse me, I have to get back to work.

      -Rob

      ...fap-fap-fap-fap...
    3. Re:What is your actual job? by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      Reading Slashdot, duh!

  24. Show Me the Money! by HazMathew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What kind of revenue does Slashdot make?

    1. Re:Show Me the Money! by laparel · · Score: 1

      Follow-up questions: Is slashdot a (your) full time job? Are editors full time employees as well? How much are they paid? How much do you make from slashdot? What is the organizational structure of slashdot?

      I know, these information might be way too personal, but still I (we) are curious.. :D

  25. Alternatives by webvictim · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Other than Slashdot, what are the websites you most enjoy spending time on, and why?

    --
    When did I realise I was God? Well, I was praying and I suddenly realised I was talking to myself.
    1. Re:Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Other than Slashdot, what are the websites you most enjoy spending time on, and why? In other words, goatse or tubgirl?
  26. what was the "oh my god" moment? by gevmage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Your recent journal entry talks about Slashdot becoming very popular very quickly. But at some point later, you realize that transferring slashdot over to a commercial enterprise would make you actual money that you could live off of. We'd love to hear the story of that meeting/phone call/e-mail/whatever.

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
  27. poll answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What'd you vote to the current poll? What's YOUR favorite Slashdot "meme"?

    I bet it's Soviet Russia. (In Soviet Russia, CmdrTaco bets on you!)

    1. Re:poll answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet it's Soviet Russia. (In Soviet Russia, CmdrTaco bets on you!)

      i think you meant: In Soviet Russia, ComradeTaco bets on you!
  28. Thoughts of giving up? by martyb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When were you most tempted to give up?

    Dealing with a bunch of creative, resourceful, tenacious, stubborn, and sometimes outright hostile nerds, I'm sure there were MANY times when you were tempted to just give up on the whole thing. e.g. page-widening trolls; Church of Scientology; Microsoft source code, or even the release of slash code to the community and the barrage of insults.

    I'm really glad you held on and persevered, but I'd like to know when you were most tempted to throw in the towel, and even more importantly, I'd like to hear the story around how you held on and kept things going.

  29. Do you view Digg as competition? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    And how will /. fend them off?

    As a longtime /. user, I really like the conversations here much better and find them to be of greater value than at digg. But Digg is more dynamic from a user standpoint, has more stories to choose from (though many are hyped, frivolous), and the conversations are getting slightly better with the tweaks they are applying to the site. I guess I'm really asking if /. is going to become more user oriented in the future or will find another path... or just stay the current course?

  30. Decade by Robotron23 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With the anneversary of Slashdot just celebrated and an entire decade having passed since you created the site, do you ever wonder what Slashdot will be like in another decade; specifically whether after twenty years you'll possess an active role?

    I was thinking what with a family on the horizon plus a lot of other side projects you may bow out after a time; but then again it was kind of inevitable as there's a lot to life besides Slashdot. But nonetheless your insight over tenure is appreciated.

    Anyway, thanks for this site Rob; the amount of laughs and great reads it has given in the four years I've browsed here is beyond measure and a lot of people here would agree that despite flaws this place is unique.

  31. Do you regret it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you regret your mass banning of moderators and other acts of temper against users?

  32. Re:Ask Rob by moderatorrater · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is another controversial subject, and the parent will probably be modded down, but it is a good question (when phrased properly): How do you feel about the political/whatever climate on slashdot and do you feel that all viewpoints are respected?

  33. Why not admit you post stories for money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I always wondered why this site wants to act like it
    does not get kickbacks for posting certain stories?

    i guess you would no longer be considered cool and hip?

    i am also guessing that and money is the most important things
    driving this site now days.

    good luck on your decline.
    i come here to read what others say, not the stories/advertisments.

  34. Infrastructure by blhack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Can you give us any insight into the hardware/platform that slashdot runs on? How many servers does it use? What did you code it in? (a half drunk, coked-up deaf guy screaming HTML into a tin can on a string?) How much bandwidth does it use?

    I know this is more than one question, but my MAIN question is just: "What does it take to run slashdot, hardware/software/bandwidth wise?"

    --
    NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    1. Re:Infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      FYI: There is an entry in the FAQ: What kind of hardware does Slashdot run on?, BUT it appears to be rather out-of-date (Last Modified: 6/13/00). Taco, could you please see to having this updated? Thanks!

    2. Re:Infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What did you code it in? (a half drunk, coked-up deaf guy screaming HTML into a tin can on a string?) http://www.slashcode.com/
    3. Re:Infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What did you code it in?

      Go back to Gaia, newtard. Slashdot runs on Perl & MySQL. It's well known. The code is open sourced. Also, a plague on any mods who modded up such a pointless question.

    4. Re:Infrastructure by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I am interested in this as well. Along with what kind of load balancing "if any" is involved. How many hits a day , bandwidth used. Yes it in in the FAQ but has it changed since then?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:Infrastructure by langelgjm · · Score: 1
      From the FAQ ("What kind of hardware does Slashdot run on?"):

      Hardware Details

      * Type I (web server)
      *
      o VA Full On 2x2
      o Debian Linux frozen
      o PIII/600 MHz 512K cache
      o 1 GB RAM
      o 9.1GB LVD SCSI with hot swap backplane
      o Intel EtherExpress Pro (built-in on moboard)
      o Intel EtherExpress 100 adapter

      * Type II (kernel NFS with kernel locking)
      *
      o VA Full On 2x2
      o Debian Linux frozen
      o Dual PIII/600 MHz
      o 2 GB RAM
      o (2) 9.1GB LVD SCSI with hot swap backplane
      o Intel EtherExpress Pro (built-in on motherboard)
      o Intel EtherExpress 100 adapter

      * Type III (SQL)
      *
      o VA Research 3500
      o Red Hat Linux 6.2 (final release + tweaks)
      o Quad Xeon 550 MHz, 1MB cache
      o 2 GB RAM
      o 6 LVD disks, 10000 RPM (1 system disk, 5 disks for RAID5)
      o Mylex Extreme RAID controller 16 MB cache
      o Intel EtherExpress Pro (built-in on motherboard)
      o Intel EtherExpress 100 adapter

      Oh wait, what's that I see down at the bottom...

      Answered by: CmdrTaco Last Modified: 6/13/00
      --
      "Anyone who [rips a CD] is probably engaging in copyright infringement." - David O. Carson
    6. Re:Infrastructure by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 2, Funny

      Slashdot runs on a 386SX/16 clone with 4 megs of RAM and an 80MB hard drive. It runs under Minix 3.0.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    7. Re:Infrastructure by evil_aar0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > a half drunk, coked-up deaf guy screaming HTML into a tin can on a string?

      Ok, so you've nailed me almost to a 'T'. ;-)

      But, seriously, were being deaf just a choice - such as being coked up, or screaming into a can - I could see this being an acceptable slam. But, in my case, I didn't do anything - of which I'm aware - to end up deaf; it just happened. And, frankly, it's not really as much of a drawback as you think. For example, when I need to communicate with others, I can use my cochlear implant. When I want quiet solitude, I just turn it off. Stuck between screaming babies and the engine on a flight? No problem: set volume to 0. Or plug into my MD player with a 1/8" jack and shut out all of the other noise. Sweet.

      Oh, of course, I can't let you get away without the obligatory, "you insensitive clod."

      --
      Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
    8. Re:Infrastructure by blhack · · Score: 1

      I apologize if this offended you. I really didn't mean it as an insult towards deaf people.

      Yes, i am insensitive, no, not a clod.

      well......maybe.

      --
      NewslilySocial News. No lolcats allowed.
    9. Re:Infrastructure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashcode. Are there actually people on Slashdot who don't know this? Damn, I feel old now.

  35. In and out of Slashdot. by pavon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    These are probably pretty cliche questions, but I am interested in the answers.

    What is a normal day at slashdot like? How much time do you spend improving slashcode vs picking stories vs the normal computer admin tasks vs other stuff. How are the workload/responsibilities split up among the different staff members? How has this changes over the years?

    I also remember back in the old days, the work you did with Enlightenment, as well as the animated short you made (Duckpins?). I was wondering if you get the chance to do much programing outside of slashcode, or what other hobbies you spend your free time doing now (besides being married).

  36. Drugs by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

    What's your favorite drugs? Psilocybin, ecstasy, amphetamine, good old alcohol? If I had to guess, I'd say you were a big amphetamine user.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  37. Re:any annoyed or happy /. effect stories? by boaworm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mm, or more to the point.

    What sites are you most proud of slashdotting?

    --
    Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
    Aristotele
  38. Oh, so much karma to burn.. by Anonymous+Meoward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you were in Soviet Russia, would a Beowulf cluster of Natalie Portmans and other insensitive clods as our 1337 new goatse overlords (confirmed by Netcraft as dying) have you naked and petrified with hot grits poured down Cowboy Neal's pants (profit!!!) ?

    --
    --- The American Way of Life is not a birthright. Hell, it's not even sustainable.
    1. Re:Oh, so much karma to burn.. by jimstapleton · · Score: 1

      What I would give for a few mod points right now - that question is such a good comment and question on the state of /.

      --
      34486853790
      Connection too slow for X forwarding? Try "ssh -CX user@host"
    2. Re:Oh, so much karma to burn.. by Kethinov · · Score: 5, Informative

      If you were in Soviet Russia, would a Beowulf cluster of Natalie Portmans and other insensitive clods as our 1337 new goatse overlords (confirmed by Netcraft as dying) have you naked and petrified with hot grits poured down Cowboy Neal's pants (profit!!!) ?


      Brilliant, absolutely brilliant.

      For the newbies among us, allow me to explain all the parts. This post is the culmination of 11 Slashdot memes which are, in order:

      1. Russian reversal - in Soviet Russa joke - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_reversal#Russian_reversal
      2. Beowulf cluster Slashdot meme - "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of..." self referential joke - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot#Culture
      3. Natalie Portman obsession Slashdot meme - originally arose due to widespread attraction of Slashdot posters to Natalie Portman - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot#Culture
      4. Insensitive clod Slashdot meme - joke originating from a Calvin and Hobbes strip dated February 14, 1986 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot#Culture
      5. 1337 = LEET = elite internet meme - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leet
      6. Goatse internet meme - a widespread shock image - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goatse
      7. "I, for one, welcome our new (insert descriptive here) overlords" internet meme - originally arose due to the widespread popularity of the Simpsons episode "Deep Space Homer" - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culturally_significant_phrases_from_The_Simpsons#Influences_on_language
      8. "Netcraft confirms, (insert target of joke here; was originally BSD) is dying" Slashdot meme - one of the original Slashdot troll posts - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot#Culture
      9. Naked / petrified / hot grits poured down the pants Slashdot meme - a reference to an unusual true story about the cruel and unusual punishment of a southern U.S. woman to her unfaithful significant other - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot#Culture
      10. Cowboy Neal Slashdot meme - a reference to Jonathan Pater's nickname which is featured prominently, especially on Slashdot polls - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot#Culture
      11. ??? Profit!!! internet meme - a reference to a joke in a South Park episode - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underpants_Gnomes#The_Gnomes
      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    3. Re:Oh, so much karma to burn.. by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      It's incomplete and thus greatly imperfect, without a reference to Mae Ling Mak, Naked and Petrified.

      The newbs won't get it.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    4. Re:Oh, so much karma to burn.. by nuzak · · Score: 1

      I think that this got an "informative" mod is the funniest in-joke I've seen in ages. You never read the words "karma whore" these days, so much as see it in all its glory. Bravo :)

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    5. Re:Oh, so much karma to burn.. by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

    6. Re:Oh, so much karma to burn.. by Princeofcups · · Score: 1

      >> Brilliant, absolutely brilliant.
      >> For the newbies among us, allow me to explain all the parts. This post is the culmination of 11 Slashdot memes which are, in order:
      >> 1. Russian reversal - in Soviet Russa joke ...
      >> 11. ??? Profit!!! internet meme - a reference to a joke in a South Park episode

      12. Constant misuse of the word "meme" (because it sounds cooler than "joke," "idea," or "concept") meme. - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meme

      jfs

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
  39. What... by inetken · · Score: 1

    What did you do with your first million?

  40. Do you like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you like Steak N' Shake? Do you like Cheetos? Do you like Busch? Do you like MC Hammer? Do you like Packard Bell? Do you like Calamari? Do you like Old Navy? Do you like WWF? Do you like Gray's Anatomy? Do you like Hotels? Do you like Pearl Jam? Do you like Google? Do you like Ann Arbor? Do you like Holland? Do you like your wife? Do you like Cowboyneal? Do you like Urinals? Do you like Coffee? Do you like -1's?

    1. Re:Do you like? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      Do you like gladiator movies? Have you ever seen a grown man naked?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  41. Q&A by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do you find it ironic when cmdrtaco.net gets /.'ed?

    Or

    What are your thoughts on the so-called 'slashdot effect?'

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  42. Old ID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A previous commentor (further up the page) asked how many IDs were active. I know that an old one of mine isn't, because I changed email addresses and then lost the password. Is there any way to retrieve an older ID that one has lost both the password and the email that the ID is registered to send lost passwords to?

    -mcgrew (AKA sm62704)

  43. What was the turning point? by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What do you think the exact turning point was for Slashdot that got the ball rolling. Maybe it happened when it was Chips and Dips, but how did word get out to the professional engineers that told their friends and so on? Did you announce your creation on usenets, was there one loudmouth who advertised for you, do you have any idea how it came to be that this was a mecca for nerds online when it could have just as easily been ignored?

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  44. Have you any regrets? by cOdEgUru · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have you ever regretted starting Slashdot, or invested so much of your time in to this site? Did any actions by your peers, by the community or by your colleagues, as a result of a story posted on Slashdot or related to one, made you ever regret your decision to start Slashdot.

    Anyway, been here a guest since 1999, and a member for the last seven. Enjoyed being part of this community, every single day (or when its non-xenophobic).

  45. What? The same old fart again?! by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 1

    ... I mean, forget Cmdr Taco, I want to ask questions to this CowboyNeal guy instead :D

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  46. What's your wife like in bed? by MeditationSensation · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's my question. Please include pics.

    1. Re:What's your wife like in bed? by Mikkeles · · Score: 5, Funny

      If she's like most women I know, breakfast.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
  47. Re:Ask Rob by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

    Liberal/leftist? What are you smoking? The most prominent feature about slashdot politics is the disroportionately large number of libertarians, not liberals.

  48. Where's Junis? by isaac · · Score: 5, Funny

    Would you publish a follow-up story on Junis?

    I found Jon Katz's Message from Kabul truly mesmerizing.

    Junis surely must have some interesting thoughts on the state of Afghanistan and his feelings towards the USA today. I'm also interested to know if he ever upgraded from that Commodore he was using to download movies - the one he hid from the Taliban in his chicken coop.

    -Isaac

    --
    I am not a lawyer, and this is not legal advice. For Entertainment Purposes Only.
    1. Re:Where's Junis? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't Junis a fairly notorious hoax?

    2. Re:Where's Junis? by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      and his feelings towards the USA today.

      If hes like most people, he'll likely think that its written to a third grade reading level and is mostly fluff.

      Wait, what?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  49. Simple Question by Billosaur · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If Google comes to you with a huge pile of cash and says "we want to add Slashdot to out stable of products," perhaps as some kind of competitor to Digg, would you a) be tempted but decline because this is, after all, your baby, b) talk to them a while, negotiate, but ultimately call it off, or c) buy that island you've always wanted and start your own country?

    --
    GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    1. Re:Simple Question by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      You know Rob has already sold to the site to VA Software right? He doesn't own slashdot.

    2. Re:Simple Question by Billosaur · · Score: 1

      All right... my bad. But then let's change the question: What if VA Software got offered a lot of money by Google? It's still his baby, even if he doesn't own it. What goes through your head when you see someone else doing something with what you created, that you may/may not agree with? I think the question is still valid, if off base because I forgot about the previous sale.

      --
      GetOuttaMySpace - The Anti-Social Network
    3. Re:Simple Question by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Well I would have to say that Google would have to be incredibly high to offer to buy the clunker that is VA Software. I say this as someone who also sold a company to them. Slashdot and thinkgeek are the only real profit centers at VA.

    4. Re:Simple Question by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      No - slashdot is still running off a homebrew computer in Taco's Mom's basement. They will never sell out.

  50. What are the biggest threats to /. success? by rjamestaylor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Slashdot is successful by any measure. You've certainly pioneered many things we now take for granted. Many "slashdot killers" have been attempted and failed or found a different niche. What are the biggest threats to /. success today and going forward?

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
    1. Re:What are the biggest threats to /. success? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      A barrage of flying chairs? (it's a new service.. seatingLive. They've got the trajectories and targeting figured out, but the landing is coming in the next rev. It's in the pipeline.)

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  51. Are you an alien? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask Rob Malda
    [...]
    from the once-every-seven-years-is-enough dept.


    Are you an alien, possibly Vulcan (choosing a name like 'Commander Taco' thinking, like Ford Perfect, it is normal), and how does your wife feel about the less-than frequent marital activities?
  52. Ok I got a question by eclectro · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Where can I find the road out of dupetown and how do I get on it??

    -Please browae at -1 to see all my future comments. Thnx.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  53. Two/three part question: by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do you still read Slashdot yourself regularly?

    If so, what are your favorite and least favorite things about the community?

  54. How will it all end? by Foozy · · Score: 1

    With a bang ("Goodbye- thanks for posting!") or a whimper ("0 replies", "0 replies", "0 replies",...) ???

  55. How much... by Trails · · Score: 5, Funny

    How much do you love tacos?

    1. Re:How much... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... oh man, you get the "clueless assburger nerd of the month" award. Nudge nudge wink wink... My hat's off to you! Well, it would be off if I actually ever wore a hat.

      A woman's vagina is often referred to as the "pink taco". CmdrTaco" is a pun, you silly person. I wonder If he does, indeed, CmdrTaco? And if he does, indeed, does that mean he has to turn in his nerd license?

      OK, this is getting silly, I better stop before they place me under arr

  56. when will you allow image posting? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2

    Or is the threat of the goatse.cx simply too severe?

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:when will you allow image posting? by Ant+P. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Imagine what Slashdot would be like if people could post images.

      Now imagine if that was real.

      Still want it here?

    2. Re:when will you allow image posting? by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      Imagine what Slashdot would be like if people could post images.

      Now imagine if that was real [4chan.org].

      Still want it here? I'm not opening that link. It's porn, isn't it?
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    3. Re:when will you allow image posting? by zugurudumba · · Score: 1

      I'm a regular slash-head and /b/tard at the same time. I have always asked myself why do I find these two sites so similar. Is it because of the memes? Is it because of the similarity between subcultures? Or trolls? Honestly, I enjoy reading Slashdot, I like to watch smart, rational people discussing things related to technology, or privacy or whatever. Then I suddenly feel the urge to brainwash myself in the shithole that is 4chan's /b/. It's like these two sites complement each other. Anyone feeling the same?

      --
      Sig
    4. Re:when will you allow image posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4chan is my dirty little secret. I've been going there since it was a straight up english language copy of 2ch. It really is kind of a disgusting shithole sometimes, but it also kind of matches up with what I thought the internet was like back in the early 90s - that's why I keep going back.

    5. Re:when will you allow image posting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a deep question...

  57. What I want to know by steveo777 · · Score: 1

    Is if you secretly stuff the CmdrTaco ballot box option on the poll system from a Windows ME laptop. Silently grinning to yourself, "They'll never know it was me on THIS machine."

    --
    This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  58. Job Specs? by Harmonious+Botch · · Score: 1

    Assuming that you might fire some unnamed editor, what are the job specs for his replacement? Pay? Bennies? Hours? Qualifications?

  59. Slashdot 10-Year Anniversary party by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    Did you write some kind of algorithm in the registration page to prevent your party from being a sausage fest?

  60. Promoting Comments by pipingguy · · Score: 1

    My profile says that I've made 3650 comments to Slashdot over the years. That can't be right, since it would indicate that I've wasted far too much time. What a waste of effort...

  61. Baby Taco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the plans with the misses about having babytaco? Any names in mind? Can we pick the name by means of a poll?

  62. The ultimate by rootnl · · Score: 1

    What is your favourite OS? What would then be your Distro of choice? Wat do you actually run at home? Vi or Emacs?

    --

    We are the people our parents warned us about.
  63. actual real news story? by mihalis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When will Slashdot stop posting unsubstantiated, or (sometimes) completely merit-free stories with a question mark at the end, as if that was some kind of excuse?

    Chris

    who of course reads such things anyway

    1. Re:actual real news story? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      with a question mark at the end When Zonk gets fired, probably.
      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  64. MOD PARENT UP by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1, Funny

    There's a lot of us want an answer to that question.

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
  65. Thinkgeek by Drakemaw · · Score: 1

    Hey Rob, If you had $1,000 to blow on Thinkgeek stuff, what would you buy?

    --
    "hokey religions and taking a nap are no match for a stab in the head" -- Black Mage
  66. Life's many paths by Nite_Hawk · · Score: 1

    Hi Rob,

    What would you have done with your life had slashdot never taken off the way it did?

    Nite_Hawk

  67. Moderation Tranparency... When? by Nymz · · Score: 1

    Along those lines, "When will long time users, such as myself, who have not had mod points in *years* be given an explanation as to why they haven't seen them?"

    When will Slashdot stop pretending it's a user moderated site?

    With all the moderation abuse and infinite point exploits, a little moderation transparency would go a long way. What good is the friend/foe tag, if abusers can simply hide who they are, not to mention escape meta-moderation with the overated-tag exploit, even when a comment has not yet been rated?
    1. Re:Moderation Tranparency... When? by goldspider · · Score: 1

      There should be an option to show you who moderated your post; at the very least when an editor does so.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    2. Re:Moderation Tranparency... When? by Joaz+Banbeck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about an 'explanation' field on downmods? So when a person wants to know why he got modded down, with one click he can read "you called parent a fucktard." This tend to promote more polite behavior, IMHO.

    3. Re:Moderation Tranparency... When? by GPL+Apostate · · Score: 1

      When will Slashdot stop pretending it's a user moderated site?

      They can't. They can claim exemption from liability by not 'editing' the comments. The day it is established that the Slashdot Management is editing the comments, they assume considerably more liability for them. Right now they're claiming 'common carrier' status.

      Of course, some would challange their 'common carrier' status, but as you said, they pretend to be a user moderated site. It's not for trivial, handwaving reasons.

      --
      Microsoft says legacy (serial/parallel) ports are bad. They don't obfuscate the hardware enough.
    4. Re:Moderation Tranparency... When? by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How about an 'explanation' field on downmods? So when a person wants to know why he got modded down, with one click he can read "you called parent a fucktard." This tend to promote more polite behavior, IMHO. For the ones of mine that get downmodded it's usually "I disagree with what you say and am too inarticulate an arse to argue my counter-point. Have a downmod."
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    5. Re:Moderation Tranparency... When? by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      Man was I tempted to downmod this. If only there were a "-0.00001 You Asked For It" option....

    6. Re:Moderation Tranparency... When? by Llamalarity · · Score: 1

      Yes, while I disagree with someone up thread that wanted to see who had moderated them. I would like to be able to give a reason for a mod (both up or down) that could perhaps be seen by them. Especially would like it to be viewable by by the metamoderators. As an option rather than automatically. This would be of great help for me on those borderline cases. Always seem to get one that takes more time than the other nine combined. Instead of trying to guess their reason from inadequate context, wasting tons of time finding it in the original discussion or skipping the metamod alltogether. Just click on 'explanation' read the short sentence, decide 'fair' or 'unfair' and move on to the next one. So, can we has 'explanation' field? :)

  68. Why are pants still optional? by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

    Why are pants still optional, and how do you know me enough to recommend them?

    (And for anyone that can't figure out the question, enable sigs and check one of CmdrTaco's posts.)

    And whatever happened to Taco Hell? It's no longer purple.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  69. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  70. Do you like Slashdot discussions? by kebes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My question is simple: Do you like the discussions that appear on Slashdot stories? Do you read them?

    My question originates from the fact that, apparently, you've only commented 368 times. Considering that you've been here "since the beginning," that's not a lot of comments. Avid Slashdotters make about that many comments per year.

    So why don't you participate more in the discussions? Do you not like Slashdot discussions? Or is it just because you prefer reading? Is it because you're too busy? (Aren't we all?) Is it because you worry that any comment you make will be unduly scrutinized, because of your peculiar status within this community? (Do you sometimes post under a different name?)

    1. Re:Do you like Slashdot discussions? by east+coast · · Score: 2, Funny

      My guess is that they don't like having him read Slashdot while he's at work. A lot of companies have this kind of policy.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Do you like Slashdot discussions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering how many slash-celebs like Wil Wheaton or Bruce Perrens get their asses kissed to the point of skin irritation when they post, I'd bet that Rob has an alternate account to post under so he can walk amongst the rabble without having every single thing he says modded up to 5.

    3. Re:Do you like Slashdot discussions? by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      More to the point: Do you have a second account that you use for anonymity?

      Is KDawson such an account, collectively used by the editors for the stories they're too drunk/embarrassed to post themselves?

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    4. Re:Do you like Slashdot discussions? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      Funny, I always thought it was moosesocks.

      In fact, I still do. Nice try to divert the blame from yourself Mr. Taco. If that is your real fake name.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    5. Re:Do you like Slashdot discussions? by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      My question is simple: Do you like the discussions that appear on Slashdot stories? Do you read them?

      My question originates from the fact that, apparently, you've only commented 368 times. Considering that you've been here "since the beginning," that's not a lot of comments. Avid Slashdotters make about that many comments per year. He probably has an account to post from anonymously. When a site founder posts on his own site one of two things happen:
      -His posts are good, and by virtue of being famous he gets modded up and some weird personality cult develops. Alternatively he'd influence discussions too much.
      -His posts are lame, at which point he gets a bad reputation of cluelessness which extends to the site as a whole.

      So it's a lose/lose situation. Besides, he probably gives himself unlimited moderation/metamods, which is just as good as commenting and more influential, and makes it easier to keep the kids in line.

      Besides it's not like it's hard to create an account. He probably rotates through them.

      Didn't you hear? Signal 11 was one of Tacos Aliases. :)
  71. PARENT is another example of moderation abuse by Nymz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    His moderation was moderated down, as redundant no less, but can we moderate down the abuser? Nope, the editor hides behind his infinite moderation points

    Power corrupts, and infinite power corrupts infinately.

    1. Re:PARENT is another example of moderation abuse by fbjon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      But it is a redundant post.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    2. Re:PARENT is another example of moderation abuse by Nymz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      But it is a redundant post.
      Actually, it addresses the fullness of the topic, because it affects all of us just like he pointed out. If you disagree, that's fine, and if you weren't aware of what has been going on for awhile that's fine too, but don't be a coward and abuse your infinite number of moderation points to censor a discussion. Notice how your comment has gotten bitchslapped too, along with everyone else in this thread.
  72. Do you run a Linux desktop? by astrashe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Do you run a Linux box as your primary desktop?

    If so, which distro? If not, what do you run?

    1. Re:Do you run a Linux desktop? by supremebob · · Score: 1

      If I remember right, CmdrTaco switched to a Mac a few years ago. He's probably running Mac OS 10.4 like most Apple users are right now.

  73. Biggest technical obstable? by khendron · · Score: 1

    What was the biggest technical challenge that ever threatened the existence of /.? In other words, have you ever hit a problem/bug that left you sitting there thinking "Holy crap! WTF do I do know?"

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  74. Silly question by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    With all the noise Slashdot gets in the comments section, has disabling of anonymous posting ever been considered?

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  75. After 10 years, shouldn't you by geekoid · · Score: 1

    be promoted above commander?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  76. A real question about the editors by hellfire · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many readers seem to have a lot of animosity over certain editors, both in history and present day.

    Years ago, it was JohnKatz and what we considered his pointless inflamatory articles that were rewritten 5 times yet all 5 said the same thing.

    Nowadays, it's people like Zonk and his complete lack of editing, posting the most slanted version of an article or a version which gets the summary completely wrong.

    My question is how to do deal with these complaints? Do you deal with these complaints in any way with more than the filters in preferences that allows you to block articles by a certain editor?

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  77. "Overrated" and "Underrated" by goldspider · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What is the purpose for the "Overrated" and "Underrated" mods? They are exempt from metamoderation, and as such are an open invitation for abuse by moderators looking to bury opinions with which they disagree.

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:"Overrated" and "Underrated" by Kjella · · Score: 1, Informative

      Well, the purpose is to say something has gone too far like with a +5, Insightful post to say "well, it's not a troll, it's not flamebait, it's not offtopic but it's not very insightful either". In itself the post doesn't warrant a moderation down, but it's more of a "meta-moderation" that others have moderated it too much. I agree on the abuse potential though, in particular it shouldn't allow you to mod a post to oblivion without cause. I think you need to have a pet stalker though, I've never found it to be a big problem but I suppose others might.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:"Overrated" and "Underrated" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i speak from experience, there is no question of abuse.

  78. Why bother logging in? by Nymz · · Score: 1

    I get 5 every week or two.
    Posting anonymously to avoid karma burn from the haters.
    Posting anonymously detracts from being able to develop a reputation system, but why bother logging in if you never get a chance to moderate. Bitchslapped.pl indeed.
  79. Taquestions by athloi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    First, thanks for a great site. I read something about "20 hour days" keeping the site afloat, and I believe it was required. For those of us who enjoy it daily (along with Dwight Silverman's column) it can be a real lifeline, especially when work is ultra-boring.

    Just a few questions:

    1. You oversaw the "internet revolution." Beyond Al Gore inventing it, beyond the dot-com hype, beyond the spam and the sockpuppets, what do you think is the future of networked communication? Is it the cloud OS and social networking, or are we rounding another bend?

    2. You've mentioned liking Postgres DBs. What other underrated hardware and software do you enjoy and employ on a regular basis?

    3. What emergent technologies do you watch?

    4. In the Wired interview, you mention a balance between wise crowd tendencies and dumb crowd tendencies:

    "When you're building a system like this you're balancing the wisdom of the crowds versus the tyranny of the mob. Sometimes a crowd is really smart, but some things don't work so well by committee. Crowds work when you have a tightly knit group of people with similar interests, but when you have a loosely knit community you get 'Man Gets Hit in Crotch With Football.'"

    What have you learned is the balance of this duality? For all of its attempts to be crowd-wisdom propelled, Slashdot does lean on the theory of exceptional individuals, because it has picked editors to filter what makes it to the front page, which cuts down on the "site-rhymes-with-bigg" tendency to put rosy garbage on the front page. Are you satisfied with the balance of your responses to whatever psychological fulcrum keeps a crowd wise and not mobbish?

    5. What if any fiction authors do you enjoy?

    6. I'm a technical writer, and am curious what you think about the current state of software and hardware documentation. Is it getting better? What are its common failings? Does anyone read it? Will single-sourcing (documentation that appears in print, online help, web sites, flash cards and text messages but uses the same text) change documentation's effectiveness radically?

    7. In the CNET article, you talk about Slashdot as a community.

    "But to some of our readers, it's a community that's here to discuss issues that are relevant to this community. There is a lot of value. The bulk of our content comes from other people. There are 6,000 or 7,000 comments on a busy day that other people write and just a dozen stories of just a paragraph or two that we actually generate, that are ours."

    As you started out in BBSs, you probably had a prexisting idea of this being important to a resource on technology. Why do you think this is?

    8. In the same interview, you talk about the ability of low-tech websites to take on big roles:

    "I think that it really comes down to the content. If you have content people want, they will tolerate a system that is inferior. Now our system is solid, but back in the day, it wasn't. Look at eBay: That system is the most hodgepodge and clumsy user interface that you will ever find. People use it because it was first and it worked."

    In the world of advertising, people call this branding. What do you think Slashdot's brand represents, and is it something IT workers will always have in common?

    9. In the Network Administrator interview, you compare Slashdot to bulletin board systems favorably.

    "Strangely not that far. It's all just a matter of scale. At some level it's all identical."

    You mean in twenty years, not much has changed except the technology? I'd like to hear more on this if you find it compelling.

    10.

  80. Re:Perhaps your reading comprehension need help by yada21 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why wouldn't leftwing fucktards have a problem with bad editing?
    Because they wouldn't notice?
    --
    I will have a sig when the market demands it.
  81. Calvin vs. Hope by toddbu · · Score: 1

    Since Calvin College is far superior to Hope College in every respect (academics, sports, etc.), do you think that Slashdot would have taken off faster if run from the second floor of North Hall?

    --
    If you don't want crime to pay, let the government run it.
    1. Re:Calvin vs. Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CmdrTaco went to Hope, and Calvin is it's rival college. Both are in Michigan, if anyone was wondering. (I wasn't, I just happened to know)

  82. Debates and Politics by evann · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has good debates on various politcal topics ranging from law to internet policy nearly every day. Bright people can make a difference if logic and pressure are applied in the right areas. There are obstacles to every "revolution", but it has to start somewhere and many countries have bad policies in the works. Debating online only goes so far, perhaps there is a way to evolve through the plight of the community. Have you ever considered leveraging the community to make a REAL difference?

  83. "The Post" by goldspider · · Score: 1

    Are moderators who were involved in The Post still perma-banned from moderation? If so, why?

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  84. I think the question should be . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I check out your site on a daily basis during my lunchtime. While I must say that I have a degree in finance, I have more than a passing interest in science and technology. You site is filled with lots of interesting articles, with some of the latest scientific research, that keeps me up to date. So, for that, I must express my thanks.

    I do apologize; The question I have is multi-part however, I think you will easily see that all parts are heavily interrelated.

    The question that I extend to you is:

    As an average-Joe who developed a website (like millions of other people have), who the fuck are you and what makes people (like the parent) think you are some sort of god, with infinite wisdom, that people would be caused to hyperventilate upon meeting you? I mean, it's not like I've heard of you anywhere else, other than on this site. Should I care who you are? Should anyone? Don't you wish you could wipe dorks, like the parent, off the face of the Earth.

    Please note, this is not a troll. I seriously would like an answer.

    Thanks,
    F. Miglietta

    1. Re:I think the question should be . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOU ARE NOT WORTHY! How DARE you insult /. as just some website like millions of others - HEATHEN! BURN THE WITCH!!

  85. What other job is there for you? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Imagine computers and/or internet don't exist. Or, better, get back 100 years, and choose your occupation. Where'd you go? Still something technical? Or something completely different? Or are you one of those "if computers don't exist, I must invent them" guys?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  86. Caring by 1u3hr · · Score: 0, Troll

    When did you stop caring if the articles had any relation to the truth? When did you decide that it was more important to have a funny "from the XXX department" line than bothering to spellcheck? When did you give up reading Slashdot?

  87. The real scoop behind Michael's departure by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

    OK, this isn't exactly on the level of JFK assassination or moon landing hoax conspiracies, but nonetheless a lot of us want to know: what really happened to Michael Sims? He was the editor we loved to hate and one day he was just gone.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    1. Re:The real scoop behind Michael's departure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  88. Non technical: Marriage. by simpleguy · · Score: 1


    If you did not propose to Katherine via Slashdot, How would you have done it?

  89. What's your favorite jet? by iknownuttin · · Score: 1
    Being part of the dot-com easy money of the late 90s, you must be worth hundreds of millions of dollars and have a couple of private jets.

    Also, which super model is the best in bed? (Obviously, that happened before you were married. wink wink nod nod)

    --
    I prefer Flambe as apposed flamebait.
  90. Re:Perhaps your reading comprehension need help by spun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It would help if you could, you know, point out some of his bad editing?

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  91. Why? by michaelmalak · · Score: 1
    So instead of navel-gazing, we're supposed to do Cmdr Taco gazing?

    Slightly more seriously, what's the point of an "Ask Rob Malda" article? He answers all the questions (or at least mine) he gets via e-mail anyway.

  92. Re:Ask Rob by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are a significant number of libertarians... I'd say there's a larger percentage of libertarians here than in a typical meatspace community. Similarly, there is a significantly higher percentage of communists/socialists (which, as an economic system, can mesh with social libertarianism). Social conservatism is, likewise, pretty under-represented here. Those are just the facts, I'm not trying to extrapolate a reason for any of them.

    That said, the editors seem to be decidedly leftist in their story selection as well as their commentary in the story's blurb (that line or two at the end that the editors add, not the quotation submitted with the story). That sets the tone for discussion and the moderation seems to follow it. Conservative comments have a 20% chance of an up-mod if they're really insightful (compared to the ever-present Ben Franklin quote which always makes +5 insightful), a 50% chance of a down-mod (most often flamebait or troll (ie, -1, I disagree)) and a 30% chance of being ignored. There is actually a group of people on Slashdot who are (were? the central user's journal hasn't been updated in a year) conspiring to up-mod insightful conservative posts in an effort to counter the group-think that tends to come from that "-1, I disagree" moderation. We've also seen dozens of examples of moderation abuses by editors (the worst offender probably being Michael) if people get too far out of line with how they want the comments to unfold. As such, I have an account I use specifically for inflammatory (to the editor's view) posts and make frequent use of the "post anonymously" button anyway. I've probably posted twice as many anonymous posts as I have posts tagged to my main account rather than risk the backlash of bitchslap.pl, moderators going through my non-archived posting history to down-mod everything in retribution because their emo-balance was upset by one of my posts, etc.

    Believe it or not (said to Slashdot as a whole, not you personally), society needs those people who are more staid and traditional to keep us all grounded just as much as they need those who constantly push us to evolve. If evolution (of the societal kind) were totally unchecked, we would constantly be experiencing the exuberance and crashes of the dotcom era, only it would be much more widespread. Can you imagine how fast we'd collapse if every time someone had a new idea, everyone jumped on the bandwagon and nobody warned to see if the bridge was out ahead?

  93. /. Meme by BooRolla · · Score: 1

    What was your favorite /. meme? (i.e. how did you vote in the last poll?) What was your most hated /. meme? why?

  94. Golden Dennace by PenisLands · · Score: 0

    Hey! Rob Malda!
    My name is Dennace Whitely. You may have heard of me before; they like to call me Golden Dennace. I'm a popular rock singer and successful businessman.

    My question is, do you use LINUX?
    Just curious.

    Ya know... if anyone's wondering.

  95. Subscribers by heffrey · · Score: 1

    How much money do subscribers pay?

    1. Re:Subscribers by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      $5.00, or in my case, about £2.50 ;)

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  96. Roland Piquepaille by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    Why do you still allow him to submit articles? Every time he posts one the SlashCrowd does nothing but jump in the thread and bash the guy for using /. for personal gain. People have even made scripts to block the guy from their /. experience. He even has his own tag: OhNoItsRoland.

    The people have spoken, and yet he's still here.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
    1. Re:Roland Piquepaille by geekoid · · Score: 1

      What makes you think that 'the people' not liking someone gets to shut them up?

      Now. /. doesn't have to post his article, but thats a different question.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Roland Piquepaille by Toonol · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The people have spoken, and yet he's still here.

      Nah, I bet most posters couldn't care less. Don't mistake a noisy 5% for the whole. I wonder if that's a seed for a question?

      Mr. Taco: You have access to stats, such as number of pageviews, active posters, and so forth. This lets you objectively measure a lot of things that we can't see. What do you think are some misconceptions that we have about slashdot? Maybe we're really still mostly IE users? Is 'videogames' the most read section? Perhaps the tech and science articles that everybody seems to clamor for are really the least read?

    3. Re:Roland Piquepaille by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Mr. Taco: You have access to stats, such as number of pageviews, active posters, and so forth. This lets you objectively measure a lot of things that we can't see. What do you think are some misconceptions that we have about slashdot? Maybe we're really still mostly IE users? Is 'videogames' the most read section? Perhaps the tech and science articles that everybody seems to clamor for are really the least read?

      No Mod points right now, but I would really like to see this one answered.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
  97. The best and the worst by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

    What's been the biggest joy of the whole Slashdot experience, and what's been the biggest suckage?

  98. Question: Trends by vinn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You've probably followed more news stories and trends over the past decade than just about anyone else.

    Based on that, what are your predictions for the next 10 years?

    Some technology is obviously going to die a quick and painful death. Some of that technology will be good and some deservedly bad. What's going to catch on? What has staying power? Google has been a golden child the last few years, will that continue? Are there any big turnarounds coming? Who's got good stuff in the pipeline? Don't you dare tell me 2008 is the year of Linux (and I know you won't) - we've both been hearing that marketing crap for the past 10 years.

    --
    ----- obSig
    1. Re:Question: Trends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Follow up question: Isn't it strange that the SAME thing will sometimes happen very shortly after it happens in the first place? Does it ever agitate you that there is a need for two, sometimes even three, extremely similar stories to cover situations like that? Thanks and kudos on 10 years!

    2. Re:Question: Trends by Paul_Hindt · · Score: 1

      Windows Vista...most definitely.

    3. Re:Question: Trends by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      Based on that, what are your predictions for the next 10 years? And what's slashdot going to be like on its 20th anniversary?

      Do you have any long term goals or features planned? Any big overhauls intended? RSS feeds into our brains or something?
  99. Question for athloi by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2

    What part of "one question per post" did you not understand? :P

    There are certainly some interesting questions there, but there's no way the editors will choose all of them.

  100. Was slashdot ever... by rehtonAesoohC · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Was slashdot ever intended to be a source of income? What caused it to become such?

    1. Re:Was slashdot ever... by Eponymous+Bastard · · Score: 1

      As a followup question. On your last story you mentioned the point at which you had to move from hosting under your desk to a real host. What about when:
      - You realized you could make money off of this.
      - You realized this could be your full time job.
      - You realized you needed real infrastructure and actual staff.
      - You realized this would be your full time job and career until you retire. (Have you passed this point at all?)

  101. Slashdot in 2038 by thalakan · · Score: 1

    Have you given any thought to what slashdot might look like far, far down the road? I recently had to make continuation plans for a community machine I maintain, and it occurred to me that it's possible that the machine will be running similar software decades from now. The only thing that would force me to replace the box would be the Unix time_t rollover in 2038, so I made plans to move to a 64-bit kernel now, which put my planning horizon far past 2038.

    One of the things that box does is pull slashdot's RSS feed. What do you think slashdot will look like in 2038? Do you think that slashdot will still be running a LAMP stack then? And finally, what disaster continuation plans are in place for slashdot?

    --
    -- thalakan
  102. yarrrr by slyn · · Score: 1

    What websites do you go to most often that aren't slashdot?

    I personally am a fan of ArsTechnica. What it lacks in sheer number of stories compared to Digg or in the discussion element of Slashdot, it makes up for with (imo) very well written, informative articles.

  103. Re:Why is CmdTaco such an ass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Seriously, I have the check the "posted by" and skip the CmdTaco stories. Such bad taste, such stupid comments. Why do you let this redneck school boy post stories and make comments? It really detracts for the website.

    Silly Rabbit, somethings should only be posted anonymously!

    xxx

  104. Question pour vous! by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Where did you get your handle from (or what does it mean if anything)?

  105. Ever want to try doing something else? by MarcinJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You've been doing Slashdot for a while, so congratulations for that. But have you had any ideas you've wanted to experiment with or work on if it weren't for Slashdot? Perhaps another type of website or maybe just some fun type of application, or something not computer or tech related at all.
    Thanks.

  106. Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by CleverNickName · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yeah, it was Larry Niven.

    I wrote about it in my blog, thusly:

    Around 1987 or 1988, I saw Larry Niven at a convention. I was officially there to be the Star Trek guy, but I didn't have to go on stage for a few hours, and rather than sit in some suite with the rest of the Star Trek people who didn't want to get too close to the masses, I grabbed my backpack and wandered around the convention as nerdy fanboy number 42.

    I bought a ton of crap in the dealer's room (mostly FASA sourcebooks, and some bootleg anime videos IIRC) and on my way down a hallway toward the gaming room, I saw this guy who was dressed in a Space Shuttle flight suit (blue) sitting behind a table that had some books on it.

    Holy shit, it was Larry Niven.

    I walked up to him and the conversation went something like this:

            Me: OMG YOU'RE LARRY NIVEN!

            Him: OMG YOU'RE WESLEY ON STAR TREK!

            Both: CAN I HAVE YOUR AUTOGRAPH!

            Both: YOU WANT MY AUTOGRAPH?!

            Both: YES!

            Me: I don't have a pen.

            Him: It's okay, I have several.

    He pulled a pen out of the shoulder pen-holding pocket thing on his blue Space Shuttle flight suit. I was so out-nerded, it wasn't even funny. I tried to counter-attack by producing my own copy of Ringworld that I had in my backpack, because I carried it with me everywhere in those days, just in case, you know, I felt like reading it. (I am not exaggerating at all. I loved -- and continue to love -- that book that much. For reals.)

    1. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's a wonderful account, and it's also awesome that you post on slashdot.

      My story isn't as cool, because A: I'm not famous and B: I was a dork, of sorts. But hey, it's my story.

      I was at a sci-fi con, had some art in the art show. Since I grew up without a TV I really didn't know much about what was going on, but my friend was helping organize the con and talked me into going and watching the art auction. We were wandering around, talking about this and that, and walked into a room. There was a strikingly pretty woman sitting in a chair, looking *very* bored, and on the other side of the room, a strikingly handsome man, surrounded by people, talking.

      I've never suffered from either shyness or lack of confidence. So I went over, introduced myself to the pretty blonde lady, and we started talking about art, as it happens. I noticed a couple people look my way, frown, but I didn't think anything of it, until my friend sidled up and said, sotto voice, "dude, you're hitting on Starbuck's girlfriend."

      I said, "who?"

      Some may argue that not knowing who Starbuck was makes me not a dork. But in the land of dorks, well, the clueless man is even more dorky.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    2. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by Foolicious · · Score: 1

      I was at a sci-fi con, had some art in the art show. Since I grew up without a TV I really didn't know much about what was going on, but my friend was helping organize the con and talked me into going and watching the art auction. We were wandering around, talking about this and that, and walked into a room. There was a strikingly pretty woman sitting in a chair, looking *very* bored, and on the other side of the room, a strikingly handsome man, surrounded by people, talking. I think you forgot to start with "Dear Penthouse Forum,".
      --
      Please don't use "umm" or "err" or "erm".
    3. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Heh. I missed out on that, too: weird being raised small-town Baptist and then realizing there's a whole other world out there, totally unlike anything you've ever seen before.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    4. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by immcintosh · · Score: 1

      It's unabashed accounts of supreme nerdiness like this that bring a tear to a poor nerd's eye... *sniff*

    5. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by graviplana · · Score: 1

      Interesting account. I'm glad you post on Slashdot even though you also have a Digg account. I have them both now but have been a /. fan since the late 90's.

      --
      "Time is nothing; timing is everything."
    6. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some may argue that not knowing who Starbuck was makes me not a dork. But in the land of dorks, well, the clueless man is even more dorky.

      I know you're trying to rescue your dork-cred here. But the fact that you were talking to a women pretty much kills it.

    7. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by Provocateur · · Score: 1

      I know you mean sotto voce. Hope it was a typo.

      Cool story, nonetheless.

      --
      WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    8. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by BootNinja · · Score: 1
      I'm also not famous, but would like to share my famous person story.
      I was at a Star Wars Con in Plano, Texas a few days after the release of Attack of the Clones. My friend and I were wandering around the signature room, when my friend decided that he wanted Peter Mayhew's autograph. We got to his table, and Peter Mayhew was out of change, so he asked my friend to go to one of the convention guys and ask for some change, which my friend was more than happy to oblige.

      In the meantime, I got to stand there for 10 minutes and listen to Peter Mayhew spew vitriol about the prequel movies and how much better the ones he was in were. He was pretty angry and bitter about it too. Didn't stop him from accepting a cameo in Revenge of the Sith though, did it?

    9. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      My story isn't as cool, because A: I'm not famous and B: I was a dork, of sorts.

      Only one of those makes you different.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    10. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      Another story from another world...and century.

      When I was in college 20 years ago, I worked in the little campus closed-circuit TV studio. One day they had a large-ish anti-drug symposium with a handful of celebrities and a satellite uplink to other schools. I showed up for my usual part-time shift in the master control room, and there was a lady there I didn't recognize. I asked her if I could help her, and she said, "No, I'm just waiting for my husband." So we chatted for a while as I worked...nice lady. When there was a break in the production, in walked her husband, and she introduced me. It was David Crosby.

      [As an aside, when I read this in preview, I thought, "Well no kidding...you work in TV and you meet a celebrity." But I was an engineering student, and this was just a part time job, and I was just some dude...chatting with Jan Crosby until her husband David walked in.]

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
    11. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      Sort of... if I were to use 'voce' I would've done it in italics, but 'sotto voice' is used often enough as an english phrase I just went with it. Dragging down the language, one post at a time.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    12. Re:Yeah, mutual geeking out is awesome by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      That's neat, and a great reason to talk to everyone: you never know who you're talking to and who they might know. The basis of networking, in a way.

      I've had a couple other interactions of this sort, and they're fun. This one stands out (to me) because of my extraordinarily dorky cluenessness.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  107. Re:My hypothesis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    \o/ Meta humour.

  108. Rephrasing the question by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 1

    What roles do the editors take in the moderation process? What parts of the moderation process have generated the most controversy?

    --
    You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  109. Re:any annoyed or happy /. effect stories? by dargaud · · Score: 1

    ...hmmm, not mine ! The only story I ever submitted was about the very first winterover at Dome C, on the high Antarctic Plateau. Since I was rith there in the middle of Antarctica at the time, I didn't want to have to deal with a crashed server 10000 miles away through a shitty satlink, so I submitted the story with coral links. It made front page news on slashdot... and the log hardly even registered a blimp ! To this day I have no idea how many people read it, and I wizened up and put advertisement on the page only 6 months later !!!

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  110. Insightful Bitchslap.pl by Nymz · · Score: 1

    I was impressed after reading your insightful post, and wanted to mark you as a friend. How disappointing that the Slashdot systems are broken due to you having to post anonyomously. The groupthink and power abuses of the very few editors really needs to be balanced, because it's breaking everything.

    1. Re:Insightful Bitchslap.pl by phantomlord · · Score: 1

      If you're really interested in marking me as a friend, I was the one who made the post.

      /puts on his tinfoil hat and waits for the trojan horse mods :)

      --
      Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
  111. Wow by ifwm · · Score: 0

    I think this is the first time I've ever seen such an obvious sock puppet from an editor before.

    It's pretty sad that you're posting AC KDawson, but what's worse is that you actually think we won't know it's you.

  112. Whatever happened to the "Ask a person" articles? by Bryan+Ischo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is the first "Ask a person" article that I have seen on Slashdot in some time. It was always one of my favorite segments of Slashdot and it just kind of disappeared several years ago. Why hasn't more effort been put into these segments recently? It's not like there haven't been tons of high-profile geeks in the news just begging to be "Asked by Slashdot". I would love to see more of these segments return - and this one is a great start.

  113. Re:Ask Rob by ednopantz · · Score: 1

    Along those lines, "Do you think the uniformity of opinion* encouraged by the modding system on Slashdot is a good thing or a bad thing? It seems to reward ideas that most readers agree with. Is that what you want?"

    * Try, for example, asserting that Steve Ballmer might perhaps not be the antichrist or that the latest iproduct might be overrated, or that Google isn't the better than puppies and get modded to -1 troll in 30 seconds.

  114. Add me to this question... by xtracto · · Score: 1

    As I posted elsewhere already, slashdot has been falling from an interesting news site to this speculative non-stories yellow journalism in the time I have been here (and as you can see from my UID, it's been too long). I really wonder why is that? is it because the "old" slashdot does not "sell" as well as this new one?, if that is the reason, then I would really prefer the old non famous slashdot than this new one...

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  115. Slashdot Scanner? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You said when Slashdot started you were blown away to see in the server logs visits from people at influential institutions, including Microsoft.

    Have you ever thought about doing a Slashdot equivalent of Wikipedia Scanner?

    One wonders just how much astroturfing goes on in Slashdot w.r.t. both products and politics.

  116. Here's one... by Cervantes · · Score: 0, Troll

    Because you proposed to your wife on Slashdot, did she force you to consummate in an IRC chat room?

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  117. Can the moderation be substantially improved? by __aailob1448 · · Score: 1

    I've noticed that there are some truly excellent posts on slashdot (anything from funny to insightful) but they are few and far between. Even when browsing at +5 level. Unfortunately, oft-repeated facts and opinions on popular slashdot topics overshadow them greatly (I'm talking about the thousandth post on how IP infringment != theft, itunes != DRM, etc.). In short, the typical highly popular argument that is sure to be modded up again and again. While many of those are indeed informative the first time, they quickly get boring.

    Another flaw I've noticed is that earlier posts are much more likely to get modded up and be read than later ones, which isn't a good thing.

    Have you noticed those issues and, in general, what ideas do you have on improving the slashdot moderation system?

  118. Favourite moments by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    Since this has pretty much been your baby for the last 10 years, what are your own personal favourite moments watching Slashdot grow up?
    Please note that your proposal, OMG Ponies, and your creation of your automated blog-to-article conversion tool (codename KDawson) are not acceptably creative enough answers.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  119. About your wife... no, not that kind of stuff... by xtracto · · Score: 1

    I just want to know, I know Rob's wife has an account on slashdot. My question is, does she still reads it? and what is her POV about you being a "high profile" geek? and what is her opinion about slashdot?

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  120. pt cruiser? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, what's the real story behind the Slashdot PT Cruiser?

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  121. Commander Taco Restaurants by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Funny

    You borrowed your Net Handle from the old management article's throwaway suggestion.

    If someone was so inclined, would you like to be involved in relations with a Commander Taco restaurant?

    (Taco Bell meets Slashdot with Linux Terminals and cheap food...)

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  122. Re:Perl, any regrets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >Any thoughts about passing on "your baby" to other coders?

    don't worry man it's gonna be aaaawwwwwwwwwwright!

  123. Statistics by teslatug · · Score: 1

    Any chance you're going to publish some recent (anonymous) statistics on Slashdot users (e.g. percent OS/browser usage, how many total visits, etc.)?

  124. The Comment Database by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Insightful

    10 years worth of comments, at thousands a day, seems like it could be a potential treasure trove of data for geeks if not academics. What do you think about a possible mechanism for people to be able to have access to it beyond the amount that subscribers have?

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  125. Here's mine. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are you such a fucking piece of shit, eh Malda?

  126. BTW: love the new tagline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Our uptime your downtime" -- true in so many ways: slashdot effect, wasted time at work/in class...sigh

  127. Posting comments by Petrushka · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How often do you post comments on Slashdot? I guess I mean: do you post under sockpuppet accounts?

  128. See here by fliptout · · Score: 1

    For reference, you might be able to dig up some public filings from the dot com days..
    For example: http://www.secinfo.com/dsvRx.52xn.htm

    I remember back in the day, circa '00, I remember seeing Malda's salary publicly stated as about $90K... I'm not sure which is more frightening, that I remember such minutiae instead the Taylor series for e^x or that I still read slashdot. :P

    --
    A witty saying proves you are wittier than the next guy.
  129. Time's effect by Maximilianop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    10 years is a long, long time... How much would you say time has affected your personal feelings and drives related to slashdot content?

    --
    The Universe is shrinking all around my head.
  130. seems like it's been a lot longer by geekoid · · Score: 1

    than two years.

    Rob,
            How much of your life does /. take these days?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  131. What is the motivation for this? by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

    Where "this" is defined as the 10 year hoopla. A bid to make us all feel old? ;) An idea pushed by the marketing/sales folks?

    I don't mean to imply anything sinister by the question, it just seems that the number of times the earth orbited the sun is not a thing we geeks usually care about unless we are doing a solar system simulation or the like. :)
    p.s. thanks.

  132. Question for Rob... by CPNABEND · · Score: 1

    Yo Taco! What's up with you "glamor Shot" photo in CPU Magazine?

    --
    My wife doesn't listen to me either...
  133. Hi Rob by theolein · · Score: 1

    You know what made me come back to Slashdot some 6 or 7 years ago? It was you. Your basic, down to earth, humorous personality devoid of all the diva tantrums or plain moronity that plague so many in our delightful world. I found your proposal to Kathleen just amazing, and I found it even more amazing that you personally wrote back, thanking me for my congratulation wishes on your wedding. You're a good person, Rob.

    Now for my question: Why are you not running for president in 2008?

    taco4prez!

  134. Here's my question... by CCFreak2K · · Score: 1

    ...if no one else asked it yet. (I got this one from someone else, kudos to whoever it was) You've been CmdrTaco for years now...isn't it about time you got promoted?

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master."
  135. If you could... by UncleTogie · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...smack Bill Gates in the face with a pie, what would be your favored flavor choice?

    --
    Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    1. Re:If you could... by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      -sigh- fine...

      If you could smack Natalie Portman in the face with a pie, what would be your favored flavor choice?

      Lighten up, folks... or have you already forgotten the infamous pie episodes?

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
  136. Slashdot v. Digg by CleverNickName · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm glad you post on Slashdot even though you also have a Digg account.

    I don't subscribe to the notion that we should only have one account in one place, and participate in one community. That attitude is one of the myriad reasons I don't waste my time on Digg any more. In addition to that annoyance, the comments and interaction at Digg is worse than useless, and even as an aggregator it's become inferior to Reddit and Propeller (where I'm a scout - full disclosure.) Digg could have been really cool, if it had the kind of leadership that Slashdot has via editors. Instead, those who would lead Digg seem more content to cash the checks and let the Digg Mob run out of control down every tube on the Internets.

    For truly useful and worthwhile discussion and insight, nothing comes close to Slashdot. In fact, if I were to ask Rob a question, it would be about the commenting and moderation system: does he agree that Slashdot has the best moderation online, and why doesn't every community use the same model?

    1. Re:Slashdot v. Digg by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      That is a great question, and I agree it's the best system out there, mainly because you control it instead of it controlling you. The combination of that and the anonymous feature allows free, uncensored discussion without excess clutter. It's not perfect, but it seems to be the best compromise around.

    2. Re:Slashdot v. Digg by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "why doesn't every community use the same model?"

      Every large online community I assume you mean, because if every community did, my online communities probably wouldn't mod me a troll nearly as much as Slashdot mods who don't like me. :-)

      Variety is the spice of life, and besides, having inferior (or different/wild west) mod systems like Digg help give web users choice.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  137. Obvious Question... by supremebob · · Score: 1

    Do you still think that the iPod is lame? Sure.... It finally has wireless now, but that model STILL has less storage than a Nomad.

  138. Only 90k? by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    That's not very much for the height of the dot.com bubble. I hope he was siphoning tax free money off...or getting kickbacks...or something. Then again it's not bad for a geek and his hobby website.

  139. Re:KDawson strikes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried to establish a standard tag against kdawson a while back - I've seen kdawsonfud, kdawsonsucks, kdawson as tags on several stories, and I think we'd make more of a splash if we all used the same tag (I was aggressive, I suppose, advocating kdawsonsucks).

    On the two other machines I've used to make posts suggesting a standard kdawson tag, I've been IP-banned from Slashdot. I can't even see the main page from those addresses. I emailed banned@slashdot.org, and apparently, the accounts were banned for "excessive trolling". One of the IP addresses had only been to Slashdot once, and left exactly one comment about a kdawson tag. Apparently, that's deserving of a permanent pink-screen ban.

    I think that was the day we had 7? 8? consecutive kdawson nonstories on the front page - some of them had links to articles, but the summary always grossly misinterpreted them.

  140. Health question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many copulating mongooses may one safely stuff up one's ass at one time without running the risk of hypermongooseemia? I bow to your universally acknowledged expertise in this field.

  141. Why do you hate technology? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (signed)

    - RIAA
    - MPAA
    - Diebold
    - Microsoft
    - Eolas
    - SCO Group

  142. Year stamps. by 6350' · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This has always bugged me since (my personal) day one: why don't slashdot articles display a year, along with the month and day, in their date? Every now and then I happen upon a link to an article on slashdot (or search back) and have to try to guess at what year the article is from. What gives?

    1. Re:Year stamps. by eldimo · · Score: 1

      This is the default behavior of Slashdot, but it is configurable. Go to the "Preferences" menu and click on the "homepage" sub-menu. You can set how Slashdot display the dates there.

    2. Re:Year stamps. by rchh · · Score: 1

      You can know the date of the article by the URL. For example http://meta.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/10/04/1319239 is published in 2007 October 4.

      --
      Computers can reverse entropy.
    3. Re:Year stamps. by monkeySauce · · Score: 1

      Yeah, annoying. I just figured it was to encourage you to login (or get an acct) so your own preferred date format will be used instead.

      I sign in to see my pretty ISO 8601 dates (YYYY-MM-DD).

  143. How Are Slashdot Editors Selected? by wdr1 · · Score: 1

    In the last half of Slashdot's history, we've seen several new editors -- timothy, michael, kdawson, etc.

    The problem is, from the view of the community, most of them suck.

    How are editors selected? Is community feedback important? How should the community voice it's opinion if they really dislike an editor?

    -Bill

    --
    SlashSig Karma: Excellent (mostly affected by moderatio
  144. Equivalent of boxers or briefs? for Slashdotters by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Star Trek: TOS or Star Trek: TNG? and Why?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  145. What WOW Server do you play on by cindysthongs · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're dying to know - what WOW server are you on?

  146. Forgot one... by rinkjustice · · Score: 1

    Stephen King, dead at age 55 - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slashdot_culture

    Not that I would ever want to see that wonderful writer dead, but it was funny how that meme propogated on/.

  147. A few questions from a lurker.. by Whatistehmatrix · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna make this even though i'm sure i wont get modded up [bad habits with that, haha]. I've been on this website for like 4 years now, and i've rarely posted, and only a few years ago did i even register. I do have a few questions though, i hope they get answered.

    1) What is the actual web browser statistics for a current day? i've always been curious about the flow of firefox, and the different webbrowers [since i've read slashdot in all the browsers, including lynx :p]

    2) Whatever happened to the OMG PONIES!?!? theme? i vote for it to come back for october 20th, as a tribute to what slashdot really is! [that, and i was kinda disappointed it never showed up last april :(]

    3) Since this is about ask you, i'll ask one about you as well. How often do you, yourself look at the website? do you read the comments also? Sometimes i wonder if you post under a pseudonym just so people dont automatically mod you +5 if you interacted in the comments.

    Anyway, congratulations on 10 years, i'm really glad i get to be part of it, this website has become one of my very favorite.

    --
    visitor from www.slashdot.jp
  148. Oh God...alright...okay... by mshurpik · · Score: 1

    As a Slashdot user since 2001 or so, there's plenty of questions I could ask.

    But here's one:

    When are you going to show the article that you are replying to?

    Should take an hour to fix, if you spend an hour on Slashdot, every 5 years or so.

  149. Regrets? by jawahar · · Score: 1

    What are your regrets in Slashdot?

  150. Ringworld by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I loved -- and continue to love -- that book that much. For reals.

    Being in the movie business you should rescue the rights and try to get it made. The part of Louis Wu is yours!

  151. Limits and the software by Degrees · · Score: 1

    I suppose the limit on 200 people in a person's friends list (and the limit of no more than 50 messages in a message list) was done to keep the hardware from buckling under the load. Are there any plans to redo the software to make the site still perform acceptably, but also allow greater user customization? For example, I'd love the ability to change the comment scores based on individual friend modifiers.

    --
    "The most sensible request of government we make is not, "Do something!" But "Quit it!"
  152. KDawson, you're a pathetic fuck by SIIHP · · Score: 0, Troll

    I like how you let the post sit at +5 all weekend so the people who want to make sure your loser ass gets fired stop paying attention, then you come in and mod it down sunday night so no one will have to answer the question.

    You're a pathetic fucking loser dawson.

    --
    I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
  153. You think modding me troll makes you less pathetic by SIIHP · · Score: 0, Troll

    "I like how you let the post sit at +5 all weekend so the people who want to make sure your loser ass gets fired stop paying attention, then you come in and mod it down sunday night so no one will have to answer the question.

    You're a pathetic fucking loser dawson."

    You're still a pathetic fucking loser dawson. Keep censoring people because you hate that they're right, while pretending you're anti censorship.

    --
    I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
  154. Re:Ask Rob by Charles+Wilson · · Score: 0

    The political climate for /. is Left/Liberal. At times it has been fun. I had an exchange a while back with someone who commented on a phrase I used: "...ax murderers, child molesters, conservatives..." The responder said, "...but you repeat yourself..." I had another response and it was laugh out loud funny. It's not funny now. Look at the development of the Tasered Student episode at UF. It's at a John Kerry speech so the first responses are glaringly obvious - The Creep got what he deserved. Then, the responses change as it is realized that it was a frickin' STEWDUNT what got tasered. "Well, we can't blame the Suits, or the Fakyoolity...I Know!...Let's blame the Cops!!!" The Party Line is disseminated and everyone gets on board. Classic Leftist Cant. Look at the scores/valuations of non party line comments. No, all viewpoints are not respected. I at least try to give a reasoned argument but it's not worth it now. Why bother? CW

  155. Taco? by jagermeister101 · · Score: 1

    What are your favorite Tacos?? Have you ever been to Mexico and tried the real stuff??

  156. Something Else? by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    Don't you want to do something else? Being stuck in basically a 'hobby' job for 10 years would drive me nuts. Aren't you itching to get onto something new? I'm guessing /. won't last forever, so what's next? Have you planned anything??

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
  157. You're still a pathetic fucking loser by SIIHP · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I like how you let the post sit at +5 all weekend so the people who want to make sure your loser ass gets fired stop paying attention, then you come in and mod it down sunday night so no one will have to answer the question.

    You're a pathetic fucking loser dawson."

    You're still a pathetic fucking loser dawson. Keep censoring people because you hate that they're right, while pretending you're anti censorship."

    Modding it down doesn't make it less true you cunt.

    --
    I only go to buffets for the unlimited soft serve.
  158. Only lightyears?! by CamoCoatJoe · · Score: 1

    /. travels at light-speed; by our 20th anniversary, we'll be Digg! My brain's melting...

    That's worse than being assimilated by the Borg; at least the Borg are cool.

    --
    This is not a signature.