Slashdot Mirror


Netflix May Already Be Killing Blockbuster?

Mattintosh writes "A blogger at C|Net takes a moment to consider the impact Netflix has had on Blockbuster. Some notable highlights include heavy losses ($35 million), job cuts ($45 million worth), and store closings: 'Much like the print media and retail stores refusing to change, Blockbuster has been a victim on an online company finding new and inventive ways of bringing a product to a customer. And due to its size and outdated corporate culture, there really is no salvation for Blockbuster at this point. Try as it might, the future of Blockbuster is bleak, at best. Sure, the company still enjoys revenue that climb into the billions of dollars, but with an ever-increasing net loss and a public refusal to focus on Total Access--the area where Netflix continues to dominate--what is the impetus for us to jump on the Blockbuster bandwagon?'"

302 comments

  1. Thank Big Tel/Cable by dal20402 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Meanwhile, the only thing saving Netflix's ass is the anticompetitive nature of the telecom industry in the US, which causes us to have broadband slow enough to make downloading DVD-quality movies too painful... time marches on.

    1. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by yndrd1984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When I go to Netflix I see "Watch movies instantly on your PC". Did I miss something?

    2. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by garcia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I just don't get it. I refuse to go to Blockbuster and I cannot justify Netflix's fees and I really like to watch movies (I consider watching three or four movies a month above average). I go to the local grocery store and up to their DVD kiosk and rent a movie for 24 hours at 1.05 (including tax).

      I drive by the store containing the kiosk (which is directly across the street from Blockbuster and Hollywood) at least several times a day. I'd rather put my money there ($5 for a rental at Blockbuster? Please.) and have slim pickings than go to Blockbuster.

      Can someone please explain to me why you are willing to pay astronomical monthly fees for Netflix on a recurring basis and you might not even get your #1 choices? I just don't understand how the business model survives.

    3. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering NetFlix offers just such a "Watch Instantly" download service as part of normal account services I have to disagree. (Well, maybe they aren't DVD quality, I haven't bothered to use it myself.)

    4. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Shimmer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it's the other way around - dedicated TV cable/fiber to the consumer will lose ground on two fronts at once.

      On the onc hand, TV stations are broadcasting digital signals over the air (wireless!). These look beautiful in HD today and will only get more numerous and stronger, especially when analog signals go away in a few years and interference is no longer an issue.

      For the few non-broadcast TV providers worth watching (e.g. ESPN, HBO), the Internet will become the platform of choice. The need for a special "set-top box" to receive cable signals will be displaced by plain old PC's connected to the Internet.

      Anyone who has both Cable and Internet is basically paying for the same thing twice (especially if you get one of those stupid "triple plays" from the same provider). People will eventually figure out that Cable is a subset of Internet and stop paying separately for it.

      Phone service, on the other hand, may survive as a distinct offering because of its importance in real life. No one has an emergency need for Cable TV, though, so it will fade.

      This is the lesson of the PC revolution, repeated over and over: General purpose PC (with networking) displaces special purpose hardware. This is why Netflix (or its descendants) will be around long after Cable is a memory.

      --
      The most rabid believers in American Exceptionalism are the exact same people whose policies are destroying it.
    5. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Indeed. The GP should have said the only thing holding Netflix back is the anticompetitive nature of the telcos, et al. Netflix offers movies for download already and with greater bandwidth they might even start offering them in an watchable resolution. I just hope they lose the IE-only bit.

    6. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The instant viewing selection is minute. I don't know if it's because netflix can't get the rights to distribute online or doesn't have the bandwidth to offer, but I won't consider this a real feature of the service until I'm regularly able to find something I want to watch online.

    7. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by dal20402 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I prefer my movies to be of reasonable quality. Netflix's selection of DVDs is also much greater than its selection of downloadable movies.

    8. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by frdmfghtr · · Score: 4, Informative

      Can someone please explain to me why you are willing to pay astronomical monthly fees for Netflix on a recurring basis and you might not even get your #1 choices? I just don't understand how the business model survives.
      Sure...because for $9/month (astronomical?? I think not), I can get a movie (have always been able to get my #1 picks so far) in my mailbox for an unlimited amount of time, drop it in the mail when I'm done, and four days later have another one in my mailbox. I don't have to stop anywhere, I can browse online, AND if I come across a movie I want to watch and it's available to stream, I can watch it instantly (assuming I have Windows; my Mac is thus far not supported). Nine hours (I think) of streaming per month is included in that $9 monthly fee.

      On top of that, when my monthly fee dropped from $9.99 to $8.99, I had to do nothing; my monthly rate automatically went down.

      Seems pretty fair to me.
      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    9. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Darundal · · Score: 1

      Or almost any selection of downloadable movies, actually.

    10. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by robbiedo · · Score: 2, Informative

      You can stream movies to your PC. It is pretty cool. Only works with Windows and Internet Explorer right now, but you basically get 1 free hour of streaming per each dollar of your monthly fee. Spend 18 dollars get 18 hours streamed. Quality is nice on a PC screen.

    11. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by pragma_x · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can't speak for everyone else, but personally, I find Netflix fantastic at providing me access to a seemingly bottomless library of old, independent and foreign movies. I tend to have rather esoteric tastes, so paying for a subscription that is almost on-demand for just about anything I could want is well worth it. Basically they have all the stuff that more space-constrained institutions (Kiosks, Blockbuster, Hollywood Video, etc) can't be bothered with . To that end, I've never had to wait for a movie to become available.

      Now on the other hand: if all you want to do is see the major releases and not pay $10 to see it in a theater, then cruising the video kiosk is certainly the way to go.

    12. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      Also blockbuster's mail service which is the same as netflix except you can return videos to the store which is quick sux anyway because blockbuster wont carry certain films and its harder to find certain foreign films. In other words corporate has some sort of political agenda and wont carry certain movies because of it. Netflix on the other hand has pretty much everything I can imagine, also a bunch of anime which is nice. downloading divx is good and fast but sometimes you wanna see some stuff on dvd, especially older anime which is hard to get a good quality versions of usually online.

      --
      Balderdash!
    13. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by evilviper · · Score: 4, Informative

      When I go to Netflix I see "Watch movies instantly on your PC". Did I miss something?

      Yes you did... Try actually USING the service. Whatever they're using does a HORRIBLE job with the conversion from DVD.

      Lots of aliasing, like they use some incredibly crappy deinterlacing filter. The video is scaled out to square pixels, even though WMV supports aspects just fine. Anyone who knows one bit about video encoding will force dimensions to multiples of 16, but the videos I've seen aren't even multiples of 4... huge waste of bits. And that, unfortunately, holds true... don't even try watching at any bitrate below the max (some 6000kbps), even with a file size of 2GBs it looks like a 1-CD rip you might find floating around on some P2P network.

      Their inverse telecine filter is crap, if it exists at all. Progressive DVDs (film) are encoded passably, but anime I've seen is HORRIBLE. Take Ninja Scroll, use some braindead deinterlacing filter that blurs the two fields, so you have the old telecine ghosts every 5th frame and it looks like complete crap... then drop one out of every 5 frames (but be sure to keep the horrible blurred frames) to make sure you completely destroy the picture... then you've just started to approximate what the Netflix conversion process does.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    14. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just don't understand how the business model survives.

      Their customers are too ashamed of their girth/sexuality to be seen in public?

    15. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uhhh, so I don't have to drive to blockbuster! In rush hour traffic in DC that would take about an hour round trip. I don't know about the other readers, but my time is worth more than $8/hour to me and that is only assuming I rent 1 movie a month from Netflix. If I manage 3 movies per month that puts me at $2/hour. Wow, I'm cheap, but not stupid. (for all math enthusiasts, $9 per month for netflix, $1 at kiosk, 1 hour to get to kiosk. -- $8 savings to go to kiosk -- $8 for 1 hour of my time, second example -- $9 per month for netflix, 3 movies this month, $3 at kiosk, 3 hours of my time, savings $6 for 3 hours of driving or $2 per hour) also, the kiosk model doesn't work so well in normal non-rush hour traffic since it still takes about 30 minutes round trip.

    16. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      I'm lazy, and Netflix saves me a huge amount of time.

      I like variety. Netflix has almost everything I want, and when they don't, they tend to get it in quickly.

      I consider Netflix to be reasonably cheap. $12 a month for me, and I pay four times that much for internet service and six times that much for electricity. It's just not a significant cost, and it easily pays for itself in convenience and selection.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    17. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by antdude · · Score: 1

      Those small stores don't always have the movies and some are far. I do try to borrow my friends' and coworkers' DVDs if possible. If not, then rent from Hollywood Video. However, these days I rarely watch movies. :(

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    18. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      Blockbuster going under would be no sad loss. Any self respecting movie geek would avoid the hell out of that place, given they force studios to edit content in movies so they'll stock them. (Graphic drug use is one area I've seen comparison footage of what the Blockbuster release looks like, compared to the one in the Mom & Pop stores.)

      I can't even remember the last time I rented a movie. I've not rented one in well over five years. My only use for the rental stores is to pick up their ex-rental titles for only a few dollars more than it'd cost to rent them. Plus, unlike NEW DVD's which can't be returned for a refund, the used DVD's, I get 14 days to return them if there's any problem.

      About the only use for renting is if you deliberately go during busy periods. I know someone who almost never pays for rentals, because of Blockbuster's "If we don't have it, it's free next time". They go for the popular releases, find which ones are out and they have no copies of, and say they wanted it. Free movies galore.

      I also get DVD's out of my local library. It's free, and they have a much more interesting selection than the latest PG rated Hollywood dross of Blockbuster and friends. (No rental store I've seen has two thirds of "The Criterion Collection". My library does.)

    19. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by hedwards · · Score: 1

      For a while I was subscribed to vongo. The video quality was top notch, and the pricing wasn't bad. But the selection was quite limited. I ran through all the movies that I wanted to watch in about 2 months.

      I won't be going back, because they scammed me for a few months of extra service and falsified their records to match up. They ended up accusing me of having my password scammed, even though the downloads were mine from during the time I was still subscribed.

      I suspect that the limitations on netflix are similar. They probably can't make as many movies available for download as they would like.

      At this point, it is mainly meant as a filler between when discs arrive. The limitation of 1 hour per dollar of monthly subscription would probably be an issue if it weren't for the limited content.

    20. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Why would you drive in DC?

    21. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No late fees: Late fees are the biggest scam since overdraft charges.

      Less than a premium movie channel: but you pick the movies you want.

      Hard to find titles: obscure movies that aren't available for rent elsewhere.

      TV on DVD: if you don't have a cable and a DVR: watching a season on DVD with no commercials is the way to go.

      Kids: kids want to see a movie over and over when they get it. Good compromise between buying every kids dvd. Plus lots of educational TV.

    22. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by emtilt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The corporate agenda is the deal breaker for me. Blockbuster's service is actually a better deal strictly in a movies-per-dollar sense, but they refuse to carry certain types of unrated films and most things rated NC-17. Their foreign and independent selections suck compared to those of Netflix, as a result.

    23. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I believe netflix gives unlimited instant viewing (streaming media) time now for the higher up plans, not hours per USD. At least it was when I signed up just recently, and I called the customer support who verified it.

    24. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by iroll · · Score: 1

      I pay $5 a month for Netflix, and often forget I have the movie for a month-and-a-half (would be $20 at blockbuster, at least... and that's the new "cheaper" rate).

      Not only that, but the movies I get from Netflix are not even available at Blockbuster, and they aren't at your friendly neighborhood Torrent site, either.

      Netflix is great because it's a long-tail model business, just like Amazon. Sure they make money on the best sellers, but they really excel at serving up the rarities, and their customer base is large enough that they can make a great profit on obscure flicks.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    25. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're not watching enough movies to make it economical for you to use Netflix.

      We're currently on the six-at-a-time plan for $36 and consider it a steal. We use one disk for movies every Friday with the whole family. We use another for our young daughter. I am currently using two for personal use - watching television series. We use one for movies my wife and I want to watch together. And my wife has one of her own. If we put the disk in the mail on Monday we have a new one on Wednesday. At a minimum, I would say we go through 18-20 DVDs a month.

      So, we're paying a maximum of $2/DVD, which is pretty good considering they have to pay postage both ways. We've had a few broken or lost DVDs and their customer service in that regard has been great. Their selection is huge. Other than once two years ago, we've never had availability be anything other than "now" (and we're pretty flexible about when we watch things anyway). It is very easy to modify your plan if you start watching fewer movies or decide you want to rent a few more. And we can do this all from home or wherever we happen to be.

    26. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by letxa2000 · · Score: 1

      I personally hate Blockbuster. Even so, I subscribed to their Netflix-like service where you could order DVDs by mail. I used it a bit at first, then I tapered off. But with the service, we still got a coupon for one free movie at the physical store per week. We didn't use the online ordering thing but used the coupon each week to rent something at the store. Then they "improved" their plan such that you only got one coupon per month. So we cancelled.

      The advantage Blockbuster has IS its store. My wife and I seldom know what we want to see days in advance. We go to Blockbuster and rent something that looks good and we go home and watch it. If Blockbuster folds, it'll be interesting to see what we do. Probably we'll just watch a few network TV shows, some of the FreeViews on Comcast, and *maybe* every now and then buy a new On-Demand movie. I can't imagine going back to ordering things via the mail and on-demand over the Net still isn't high enough quality.

    27. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Bodrius · · Score: 1

      I have to agree. Netflix gives a pretty good deal for rental, but the main benefit is that it is far from 'slim pickings'.

      The mode of rental is very different, though - it just clicks once you build your queue and start getting films.
      It's not about dropping by on a random moment of ennui, to pick up a movie that is hopefully not horrid... it's about setting up your 'movie wish list', and knowing that practically anytime you want you will have a Good Movie (TM) you actually want to watch.

      I haven't been as lucky as you - I've had my top picks being unavailable for a while. But since there's always a good movie in the 20+ queue of items I want to watch, it is quite irrelevant. The renting is not as time/opportunity sensitive as the retail model, because you'll never end up on the scenario of "wasted trip vs rent Armageddon".

      Also their review / recommendation system is actually useful for foreign / indie movies.
      I've discovered a lot of great movies / directors on Netflix I'd never have seen otherwise, including most of my current favorite movies - something exceedingly rare in the retail world, where either the choices are limited or they're exceedingly bad.

      Unlike in college, I'm far too busy to abuse their pricing model - but they're still my main source of new movies, and I haven't found a better deal for that.

      --
      Freedom is the freedom to say 2+2=4, everything else follows...
    28. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Yoje · · Score: 1

      I just don't get it. I refuse to go to Blockbuster and I cannot justify Netflix's fees and I really like to watch movies (I consider watching three or four movies a month above average). I go to the local grocery store and up to their DVD kiosk and rent a movie for 24 hours at 1.05 (including tax). What's wrong with Netflix's fees? They seem perfectly reasonable. In their most basic plan, I'm paying about $2.50 per rental, and the amount average decreases a bit each time I go up in plan service - and that's not including the on-demand stuff. Last time I checked, Blockbuster is $5+. And with the $1 grocery store kiosk, I have to come back in 24 hrs, and I end up making a wasting trip and paying the savings in gas. I usually watch movies once a week, so Netflix works for that perfectly, and I don't have to worry about late fees or making wasted trips.

      Not saying stores are bad though, both have their place. Netflix doesn't have the "instant gratification" -- if some friends and I have to watch a certain movie "right now", I can head down to the $1 kiosk. If I wanted a larger library to choose from for my instant gratification, we can go to Blockbuster and pay the $5+ premium for that service. Netflix works for me mostly, and for the occasion it doesn't I can use the physical store choices. For others, they want to be able to have a sudden urge to watch a movie and pick it out right then, grocery stores and Blockbuster stores are there, you just pay extra for that added "instant gratification" convenience. I don't believe either is going away anytime soon. Well, not until the availability of home fiber connections is as common as a neighborhood Blockbuster.

    29. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your post only lacks one thing:

      Worst online video service ever.

    30. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      There's always other video rental stores. It seems like blockbuster has drive the majority of them out of town, but it would be nice to go back to when I was a kid, and you could get the 7,7,7 deal. 7 movies, 7 nights $7. or 3 movies for $5, or just the $2.50 per movie. I'm not sure when or why renting movies got so expensive. VHS tapes were way more expensive than DVD, and they wore out, and they took up more storage space. It shouldn't be a question of whether or not to rent or buy. You can often go to Walmart or some DVD/Music store and buy movies for the price it costs to rent them, maybe with a small premium, but then you own them, and never have to return them.

      If you ask me, what blockbuster needs to do is to bring their prices way down. $3 for a rental is about right, And sell off the used copies of movies for something around $7. Right now the seem to be around $15 for the used copy. They should realize that they can make up the difference in volume.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    31. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by swv3752 · · Score: 1

      Wow, my worst case is four days if I return on a Friday. Any other weekday, I get two days.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    32. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by JoeyBlaze · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's funny, I was just telling someone how I couldn't tell the difference in regular TV and Netflix's Watch Instantly (on a 42" set)...Granted I wasn't expecting it to be great quality, I am still impressed with the service.

      Apart from a limited selection (~5K titles), and the fact it only wants to run in IE (but has a simple full-screen interface), it is everything I would expect from the company's early approach at on demand streaming video.

      I guess YMMV, but they do include it at no additional cost. At least we are seeing some entry into this market; it's only going to get better over time.

    33. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      More like with Digital cable service, Pay-Per-View movies etc. are to blame. Many companies modernized their infrastructure and have a boat load of movies available for the same price as the Blockbuster rental. There are a lot more people watching via PPV then there are illegal downloads. In any case, I'd like to see a reduction in cost for PPV rentals before I'd start using it. $5.00 (in my area) a pop for a movie is too much.

    34. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Can someone please explain to me why you are willing to pay astronomical monthly fees for Netflix on a recurring basis

      Astronomical? I've been with Netflix since '02. My lifetime average (last time I checked) has been about $1.10 per movie. With a huge selection. And no time limit. And don't have to go anywhere to rent or return.

    35. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by lastchance_000 · · Score: 1

      I have the Blockbuster service, and a store is within walking distance. The reason I switched from Netflix is that once I watch one of the mailed DVDs, I can return it to the store for a free rental. With a little foresight (don't drop the DVDs in the mail), I can watch something on the spur of the moment.

    36. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      The business model survives because your local Blockbuster or that lame kiosk at the grocery store has a tiny fraction of the selection of Netflix. If it's available on DVD, then there's a 99% chance it's available from Netflix. Not only that, but if you have an HD DVD or Blu-Ray player, then you can rent the those discs at no additional charge.

      And the fees are not astronomical. I have no idea why you think that. It costs about $6/month/disc for me. I watch mostly TV shows via Netflix, so let's do the math. A particular TV shows on DVD has 4 episodes per disc. The turn-around time for a DVD is two days (drop it in the mail on Monday, get a new one on Wednesday). 7 days/week is about two DVDs a week. Since there are 4.5 weeks/month, I can go through about 7 discs a month. That's less than $1/disc, which means I pay less than 25 cents to watch a TV episode. And note that this is episode is unedited, with no stupid network logos or commercials, and it's a better picture quality than what I can get through my cable company.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    37. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by pla · · Score: 1

      Can someone please explain to me why you are willing to pay astronomical monthly fees for Netflix on a recurring basis and you might not even get your #1 choices? I just don't understand how the business model survives.

      Because first, I watch more than "three or four movies a month". I watch almost no (live) television, preferring to wait until most series come out on DVD - No commercials that way, sometimes a few extras, deleted scenes, and if I really want, I can watch the whole season in one or two nights.

      Second, at a mere 1 DVD every other day (NetFlix's infamous throttling has gotten a bit better over time, I can actually get a turnaround now of perhaps 20 per month, two every three days), I pay about the same price per disk (if not less!) as you do at the kiosk, making that "astronomical" fee of $16.99/mo not really all that bad. Compared to my cable TV bill, almost 5x higher and I watch it less, I'd hardly call Netflix all that expensive.

      Third, I won't say I don't like any "mainstream" movies, but fewer than a dozen Hollywood hits come out per year that I have the least interest in seeing (and usually only one or two per year that I really want to see). Your Kiosk contains nothing else but those top-24 blockbusters of the year. Instead, I mostly prefer imports, such as old Brittish comedy series (not just MP and its derivatives, either - Red Dward, Young Ones, and so on). Even Blockbuster doesn't carry most of what I watch, but NetFlix has it all.

      And finally, even having the kiosk somewhere you go every day, you still need to actually stop and use it. I get home, and at least every other day I have a DVD waiting in my mailbox.



      I just don't understand how the business model survives.

      I'll second that, but direct it toward any brick-n-mortar stores, or even those Kiosks you personally favor. I don't get why NetFlix hasn't completely driven the rest of them out of business yet.

      Though in fairness, I suspect your own movie-watching habits more closely match the mainstream than mine do... You watch only a few movies a month, mostly recent Hollywood hits, and don't plan what you want to watch in advance (perhaps that morning with the SO, but not usually longer than that). For that demographic, NetFlix does indeed cost somewhat more (though still a hell of a lot less than even one rentals per week at BB), choice means nothing, and even the inconvenience of needing to go out to get a movie occurs infrequently enough not to annoy you.

    38. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      Lets see.

      Aliasing - Check Deinterlacing - Check Square pixels - Check Force dimensions to multiples of 16 - Check (Awesome!) Inverse telecine - Check telecine ghosts - Check

      +5 informative - double check!



      Now, I just tried to explain this to Joe - he asked me to STFU and let him watch his movie from Netflix online on his tiny 17" screen.

    39. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      in my mailbox for an unlimited amount of time, drop it in the mail when I'm done, and four days later have another one in my mailbox

      30/4 (round down) = 7. So you get to exchange at maximum 7 times in a month.

      You're paying more than the GP, and they're doing less work to make that happen. Doesn't really seem fair.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    40. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      Because a lot of people are not into Hollywood shit they dish out at either Blockbuster or your local grocery store?

      Netflix collection is just too good - so far, they have not disappointed me in Indie, Foreign, Documentary, TV Series and even in obscure 70s Japanese Sexploitation category.

    41. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --I've subscribed to Netflix ever since the previous Slashdot article detailing their pro-customer stance (* Reference needed - TIA) -- but have been tempted to go to Blockbuster to rent a movie for date-night (same night) that wasn't in my NF Q.

      --Blockbuster's biggest advantage, as said before, is their Immediate Availability. I have ~300 movies in my Q right now, but occasionally I'll want to watch a certain movie with Teh GF -that night.-

      --Of course, BB is far too expensive these days (almost $5 for a movie rental?? Gimme a BREAK!) so I just compromise.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
    42. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      It depends on where you live and when you return it. I've got a warehouse quite nearby, so if I drop a video in the mail Tuesday morning, I've go another one in my mailbox on Thursday afternoon 90% of the time. (I've had a couple of videos take an extra day in the 5 months I've been with Netflix. Plus, of course, extra time for Sundays.) And since I've got the $14/month 2-at-a-time plan, I usually go through 3 per week. That's a bit over a dollar each, BUT a) I don't have to go further than the mailbox on the corner and b) I can keep them as long as I want if I don't have time to watch right then.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    43. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I agree, I mostly use it for TV shows and I doubt I could get Sesame Street Old School (yes, that's what they call the new DVDs of 60s-80s Sesame Street) or The Muppet Show at the grocery store kiosk. Heck, I probably couldn't even get ST:TNG or Battlestar Galactica. House and Scrubs, maybe. And those six shows pretty much cover 90% of what I've rented in the past few months. (It's gonna take a while to go through the entire 7 seasons of ST...)

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    44. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by C.+A.+McClellan · · Score: 0

      The movies are, or at least were, more expensive due to the fact that in order to be allowed to rent movies video stores generally have to pay much more per VHS/DVD. I saw a manifest one time for a large local chain, about 6 years ago, and they were having to pay something like $50 - $65 per movie due to the additional costs forced on them. That is the reason that when you melted a movie in your car you generally were charged thirty or forty dollars.

    45. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by neomunk · · Score: 1

      I lost a movie from a video store (VHS, about 12 years ago) and they told me the replacement cost was $135!!!

      I laughed and never looked back. Wrong of me, maybe, but it felt like extortion.

      IIRC it wasn't even a brand new release.

    46. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Jinjuku · · Score: 0

      Netflix watch now looks good 'enough'. Maybe if we had Internet 2 / IPV6 it would be better. I think for instant viewing it is as good as it gets currently. I have to give Netflix a pass on this. What is the alternative for realtime streaming?

    47. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by miskatonic+alumnus · · Score: 1

      I agree with several other respondents. I'm a cinephile who enjoys viewing foreign, independent, and lesser known films (in addition to the occasional Hollywood blockbuster). Netflix has a fantastic selection, and I average about $1.50/disc, which beats anything the local competition has to offer.

    48. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Aliasing - Check Deinterlacing - Check Square pixels - Check Force dimensions to multiples of 16 - Check (Awesome!) Inverse telecine - Check telecine ghosts - Check

      Poster probably works in video production industry - check

      And for those of us used to working with digital video, most of what is being pushed over the net is pretty crappy. I recently signed up to a phone-tv-internet over ADSL service here in France and while the net connection is fine and the phone is passable (if you don't mind the extra hiss compared to old fashioned phones) the TV is pretty shocking.

      Colour-banding every time there's a blue sky in shot - check, chunking great compression artefacts - check, horrible mosquito noise on detailed images - check, random audio drop out - check.

      Hell, it makes me pine for the good old days of Beta and good, old-fashioned picture drop-out and splats. At least those didn't make half the image turn green until the next key frame.

      "Digital Quality" my arse...

    49. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 1

      If you are watching movies on the tiny screen of your computer, it does not matter. I personally never use the feature. A good DVD with a good DVD player on my projector is the only way I watch movies.

      I am not saying what GGGP said was wrong - my point is that it works okay for most of the people, people who just logs in and clicks on "watch online".

    50. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by sheldon · · Score: 1

      I stopped using Blockbuster years ago, when they were doing 5 day rentals that were really only 4 days. Was tired of late fees I guess. That was years ago, I think I still owe them $20 and I refuse to pay.

      For a while we were using the kiosk at the grocery store, and it was good. Until everybody else found out about it. Then I'd have to wait 15 minutes in line only to find out that the movies weren't available. There was the sign on the side of the kiosk showing the movie, but it was nowhere to be found in their menus.

      I gave up, and went with Netflix. Yes, it's $12/month and I was probably only spending $4 at the kiosk, but I was also spending several hours of my time waiting in line for that stupid thing.

      Plus, the nice thing about Netflix is I can get foreign films and older movies that I'd never have gotten at any kiosk or store front.

    51. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I just have to say that comments like this are what make Slashdot the greatest. Discussing the technical nuances of video codecs, deinterlacing filters, and yes - referencing Ninja Scroll - in the same paragraph is somehow just absolutely satisfying.

      Rock on, man. You're what's keeping this site alive.

      -Dan

    52. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by aichpvee · · Score: 1

      Not everyone wants to watch movies on their computer or depend on their Internet connection to do so. Even if there were perfect streaming of movies that looked and sounded identical to a DVD that would not kill off physical disc rentals. Not sure what fantasy land you guys live in that you think this would be the case.

      --
      The Farewell Tour II
    53. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by r1_97 · · Score: 1

      "explain to me why you are willing to pay astronomical monthly fees for Netflix.."

      Come on! The fees are probably less than your cost for gas to the local grocery store and $1 rental 3 or 4 times per month. Also the convenience and their data base makes it an economical alternative for me.

    54. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 1

      While that sounds crazy today, that's how much those movies cost the video stores back then.

      Back before DVDs, most movies were "priced for rental", and would cost the video stores between 50-125 each. Occasionally you'd see releases that were "Priced to Own", in the $25 - $35 range, but those were less common than the Priced to Own films.

      It's one of the reasons Blockbuster was able to drive the smaller stores (like the one i used to work at) out of business. They were able to buy the new releases at a much lower price because they purchased mass quantities for each of their hundreds of stores and got a significant price break, allowing them to have higher profit margins and larger selections. The smaller stores simply couldn't compete, and one by one went out of business.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    55. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plans must have changed because I seem to remember them letting you have 2 or 3 movies checked out at a time and also 4 days sounds like a worst case scenario. 2 or 3 days is about average.

    56. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The telecom monopolies actually play a minor role. Far more important are the entertainment content monopolies, which refuse to release most content in any non-physical format. Otherwise you could "rent" a DRM managed DVD quality file. Sure, it would take hours to download, but that's still faster, cheaper, and less likely to get lost in transit.

    57. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by evilviper · · Score: 1

      my point is that it works okay for most of the people, people who just logs in and clicks on "watch online".

      As I said, standard live-action film is passible. Their Anime conversions, however, will look horrible even if you watch it on a 9" screen.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    58. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Well, for you it may not make sense, but for ~ 50% of the US, it can make a lot of sense to use Netflix. Look, many people are rural. They would need to drive 20 miles to get to a video store, and it wouldn't have the selection of Netflix. So, it costs them ~1 hr travel (30 minutes there and back - or they have to both work near one and plan around their work schedule), $3-$5 in gas, car wear and tear etc. They may not have broadband, but if they do, they still have likey slow speeds. They can use P2P and wait while breaking the law, or use Netflix and wait and be legal.

      Netflix is great for these users. It's also great for people who want access to DVDs they really can't get save via Amazon... maybe.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    59. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by gordgekko · · Score: 1

      The fact that some of us have televisions far bigger than our monitors?

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    60. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      I only drive into town only about once per week, so I never know when I would get a chance to return a rented DVD to a store. Even then it is not always to the same part of town, so would any grocery store allow me to keep rented DVDs for a week or two? The mail does arrive every day and Netflix would not charge me late fees anyway, so it would be the only practical solution for me. I not want to spend an hour making a special trip to town, each time, just to return a rented DVD. Burning gas and wasting time by making unnecessary trips into town in not a way to save money.

      When I do get into town, it is usually just before going to work, so I usually do not have time for any leisurely shopping for stuff like DVD rentals anyway. Late at night, I do have plenty of time for shopping on-line and could make my selections then. I plan to give Netflix a try sometime.

    61. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by rho · · Score: 1

      I thought your post was interesting up until you admitted that you watch anime.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    62. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by rho · · Score: 1

      Can someone please explain to me why you are willing to pay astronomical monthly fees for Netflix on a recurring basis

      I pay about $24/month and get 4 movies at a time. I don't find that astronomical at all. Add in that I get 24 hours of streaming video too, and I'm a happy guy. Granted, I don't pay for cable TV as well. Netflix is like an infinite Tivo with 24-48 hour lag. I have no complaints.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    63. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four days later? I dropped 3 in the mailbox Monday morning, and had 3 replacements on Wednesday. This is my typical experience. Sometimes if I request a less common film I get it from a more remote distribution center, and it takes 1-2 days more.

    64. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by kidcharles · · Score: 1

      I don't think I've ever seen a rant so well backed up by meticulous technical detail.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.
    65. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by el+americano · · Score: 1

      They're just a middle-man that adds no value. When the age of ubiquitous direct downloads comes, whether it's to the PC or the TV, nobody will need Netflix.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    66. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      A couple more points:

      • No support for Linux or Mac machines (about 10% of the US market right now)
      • Only a small subset of their movies support this option, mostly stuff from the 80s and earlier
    67. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I want one site to go to that handles all of my video rental needs. Netflix fulfills this, and for only $16 I might add. If I wanted a bunch of crap videos, I can go to YouTube any day.b

    68. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by tylernt · · Score: 1

      I can get a movie ... in my mailbox for an unlimited amount of time,
      See, this is false economy. Every day you keep a movie, you are throwing money away. Netflix wants you to keep the movies a long time -- less postage and less labor for them. If you're paying $9/mo and only watch 1 movie a week, you're paying $2.25 for each of those -- and that's not much less than renting them at your local video store.

      The only way to really make Netflix economical is to watch a movie the same day you get it and send it out the very next day. The Blockbuster plan has a leg up in that respect as you can drop off a movie at the store and get another with nearly 0 hour lag time. Less lag = more movies per month = more bang for your buck.

      Of course, if you subscribe to Netflix to get less-popular movies in the "long tail", then it's less about price as it is about selection. But anyone looking to save money yet keeps their DVDs for days and weeks on end, isn't getting a very good deal.
      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    69. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by EggyToast · · Score: 1

      Uh, it's $9 for "1 movie at a time," which equals at least 1 movie every weekend, and possibly as many as 8 if you watch them as they arrive.

      In other words, it's either about $2 a movie or $1 a movie, depending on how much you watch. Don't need to go to the grocery store to pick one up, don't have to watch it within 24 hours, and the selection is incredible. "Astronomical?"

    70. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by evilviper · · Score: 1

      No support for Linux or Mac machines (about 10% of the US market right now)

      In fact, no support for any Windows versions before XP (Using 2000? Too bad). No support for Windows (even XP/Vista) if using any web browser other than IE.

      Only a small subset of their movies support this option, mostly stuff from the 80s and earlier

      There's plenty of stuff from the 90s, and what's more, there's were lots of good movies from the 80s and earlier that I still enjoy watching, almost all of which aren't available for watching online...

      Scrolling through the top 50 is a sad, sad experience.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    71. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix has several problems.

      1) They are thieves in charging sales tax where it's not ude. I live in Nevada and Nevada does not charge rales tax on video rentals. Only the sale (not rental) of tangible property (not intellectual property) is subject to the tax in Nevada. Blockbuster doesn't' charge sales tax for in store rentals or on-line service. But netflix does, in spite of my repeated complaints.

      2) Their round trip postage cost is about $1 per video, so if you rent more then 17 videos per month, and thats pretty easy to do, then they loose money on you, and start to treat you in bizarre ways (throttling etc)

      3) Their average customer on the $17/mo plan only rents 5 videos per month. Soon they will figure out they are wasting money.

      4) Their recent price reduction as one guy mentioned was only a response to hits from blockbusters total access plan. Once blockbuster does go under, they will raise prices and slow down shipments.

      5) Blockbuster did recently raise prices on their Total access, used to be unlimited, and I was watching 30 movies per month on the $17 plan.

      I predict both will go under, and on-line services, and $1 automated video kiosks will take all the market.

    72. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by sydbarrett74 · · Score: 1

      Yeah this is my biggest beef. They don't even support Firefox on XP for crying out loud.

      --
      'He who has to break a thing to find out what it is, has left the path of wisdom.' -- Gandalf to Saruman
    73. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by encoderer · · Score: 1

      Except when you add in late fees (which don't exist with Netflix), a nearly unlimited selection, the ability to nearly always get new releases as soon as they come out**, and none of the inconvenience of driving someplace to take your movies back. Who hasn't been sitting on the sofa at 10:30 on a cold winter night when they have to make the decision of whether or not $4 in late fees is a good deal in exchange for not having to trek out to the cold ass car.

    74. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by dswensen · · Score: 1

      Three or four movies a month? I watch a hell of a lot more than that. I sometimes watch five to eight a week. That's why I find Netflix's rates fine for my hobby. I'm also very lazy and late fees ended up costing me a fortune when I was renting locally, so there's that.

    75. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by el+americano · · Score: 1

      Calm down. I was talking about the future. What you want does not have to be provided by Netflix, although it currently is. At some point the movie studios can set up their own sites for very little money and completely replace the function of Netflix. I don't see Netflix ever having leverage in the market.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    76. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I just hope they lose the IE-only bit.

      While the anticompetitive telcos are to blame for other things, like the lower quality of Netflix's downloadable movies, the IE-only bit's blame lies with the anticompetitive and idiotic movie industry and MPAA, which surely refuses to allow downloadable movies without built-in DRM.

      Netflix's downloadable movies use Microsoft DRM in conjunction with IE and Windows Media Player. I don't see how they'd be able to expand to other browsers and platforms unless this DRM requirement were dropped. It's pretty stupid, though, since with a Netflix membership, it's trivial to just have regular DVDs mailed to you and just rip them as they come in, and return them the next day for more.

    77. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I can't count correctly...if I drop a DVD in the mail Monday, Netflix gets it Tuesday (we have a Netflix PO Box here in town), the new one goes out Wednesday, I have it Thursday.

      So really, I only wait three days.

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    78. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by frdmfghtr · · Score: 1

      Well I erred on the numbers...if I mail one back on Monday, I'll have the next one Thursday...three days, not four. It may not matter much, since dropping one in the mail on Saturdays throws an extra day in the mix (Sunday).

      In any event, the minor cost difference is trivial; I pick my movies online and they come to me. It's the convenience of online selection and not having to go to the store BUT paying a little vs. a really cheap rental rate BUT having to go get them and a 24 hour rental limit...it's what you value more in the end that tips the scale.

      --
      Government's idea of a balanced budget: take money from the right pocket to balance...oh who am I kidding?
    79. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Soooo... video geeks don't like the service.

      The rest of us just enjoy the videos, however 'imperfect' the picture is.

    80. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by stars_are_number_1 · · Score: 1

      But why, if I can go to one retailer that has most of the content available in the wild, would I go to multiple studios websites, paying each of them different prices and subscription fees?

    81. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if it's cheaper than other sites, because it's direct from the studio? What if it's only available from their own site? They might even create one exlusive site together with other studios to make it more convenient and well known, but the idea remains that they wouldn't have to share any proceeds with Netflix or anyone else.

    82. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by romrom97 · · Score: 1

      Running on my laptop at 1900 x 1200 resolution through Time Warner Cable Internet, the movies I watch look beautiful and don't stutter or pixelate at full screen. Buffering a movie takes about 10-15 seconds. Netflix streaming scales to the quality of your connection, just like Slingbox. The better your connection, the better it looks. I would guess the closer your connection is to the 384 or so basic DSL, your quality would suffer.

    83. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pay 10.49 a month for Blockbuster total access. With this I receive the next movie on my list, keep it to watch at my convenience and either mail the movie back and wait two days for the next to arrive or, stop by the local brick and mortar blockbuster, exchange the movie for another to watch, have them credit the return in the system and two days later receive the next movie on my list. this way, except for Sundays, I can watch a different movie two out of three consecutive days. That is not a bad option. I select movies I want, then exchange the movie for one for the children at the store. I have friends how complain about NetFlix being slow on the turn around even though both NetFlix and Blockbuster have online centers in the same city.

      take it for what it is worth, no refunds.

    84. Re:Thank Big Tel/Cable by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Netflix streaming scales to the quality of your connection, just like Slingbox. The better your connection, the better it looks.

      In case you're trying to imply something, I can assure you I watched the highest quality versions Netflix has available. I do have a slower connection, but it's quite easy to chose the highest quality version instead and let it download in non-real-time.

      The fact that you didn't notice any quality problems says either you just watched a few movies that were overly easy to encode, or you just didn't notice the noise, grainyness, etc., etc.

      And like I said, anime suffers horribly. Go watch Ninja Scroll.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  2. Needless to say... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 0, Troll

    The MPAA will blame Blockbuster's losses as due to piracy.

    1. Re:Needless to say... by kryten250 · · Score: 0

      True, and it is partly correct. How many tech apdt friends will rip and burn movies to avoid buying them, maybe 2% of sales. I can reference the buddy whip speech in Other Peoples Money a la Danny Devito

      --
      FlyingPizzas.com, for the tasteful hermit
    2. Re:Needless to say... by aztektum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For a minute there I was going to mod -1 overrated but I thought I'd reply instead. Apparently some mods were swayed by your flashing for the cameras and offering up a sound bite.

      But as I see it, even if the MPAA *did* blame it on piracy, the article is about Netflix *winning*, so right there is a built in counter-argument. That is to say, "If it's piracy, MPAA, then shouldn't Netflix be eating shit too??"

      However, there is the argument that the MPAA is a buncha lying fucks, so in a way you have a point. Don't put anything beyond them, even if there is a possibly logical argument to the contrary.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    3. Re:Needless to say... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, the netflix settup uses fewer copies of movies, because each individual shipping location covers a larger population than a given brick and mortar blockbuster. Basically, the statistics of it say they need fewer padding copies to cover the (unexpected) surges in demand. This means that even though the same total amount of renting happens, the movie studios see fewer dollars as a result.

      I know my statement appeared as a general hatred of the MPAA, without much forethought, but they do lose money with netflix compared to brick and mortar.

      This whole argument depends on netflix and blockbuster both having sensible purchasing policies with demand analysis. I don't know that.

    4. Re:Needless to say... by Duncan+Blackthorne · · Score: 1

      You got a score of 4 for an 'insightful' post; I say it should be a score of 5 for a 'funny' post instead, but darkly funny because that's likely to be exactly what will happen. ;)

    5. Re:Needless to say... by JackieBrown · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would think that video rentals would help lead to piracy (renting then ripping - makes it more anonymous as well.)

    6. Re:Needless to say... by MrCopilot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      But as I see it, even if the MPAA *did* blame it on piracy, the article is about Netflix *winning*, so right there is a built in counter-argument. That is to say, "If it's piracy, MPAA, then shouldn't Netflix be eating shit too??"

      Where do you think the "pirates" get their movies? Netflix makes it cost efficient. Blockbuster does not.

      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    7. Re:Needless to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The assertation that movie studios see fewer dollars as a result of fewer rental copies being purchased is incorrect. Rental companies are charged different fees than consumers - I believe it's typically around $5.00 per disc for a rental DVD of a major Hollywood film, which really isn't too far off from the accumulated costs of materials, production, shipping and handling. In return for this deal, the film studios are offered a percentage of the profits from rental fees. This is infinitely better than the VHS rental licensing scheme, since replacement media can be had for extremely cheap.

      This is also an extremely lucrative source of income for Blockbuster, since they are allowed to sell used rental product for (initially) very near the full retail cost of the movie and none of this money is sent back to the film studios. Extremely low-margin and low-risk, which is also why you'll get the till jockeys shoving it down your throat when you're too lazy to drive to Walmart to save a few bucks on a new DVD.

    8. Re:Needless to say... by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      Or your crack could just refer to MPAA seeing any kind of non-monopolistic activity as lower profits for them and therefore piracy because their common sense and logic is flawed.

      --
      Balderdash!
    9. Re:Needless to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cancelled my Netflix membership in less than a month. I called it the "eat shit" approach. They never stock enough of any popular movie so don't hold your breath on ever seeing your first three selections. I even tried adding a bunch of older films and I still only recieved one of my first three selections. The reason they want you to add so many options into the cue is good luck getting a popular movie. At least with Blockbuster, and I do hate the sleazy SOBs, I can go in early Tuesday and get new releases. With Netflix you tend to scramble for scraps. If I had to depend on Netflix I probably wouldn't even bother.

    10. Re:Needless to say... by absoluteflatness · · Score: 1

      Unless, of course, you use Blockbuster Online. Also, since each movie doubles as a free rental if you take the inconvenience to return it to the store, it's probably more cost-efficient.

      Of course, you're then restricted by the somewhat lower variety at Blockbuster Online, and further by the much lower variety at any given Blockbuster store.

      No easier way to, say, rent the Battlestar Galactica (insert your favorite TV show) DVDs. With some strategy in queuing, you'll basically always have the next one at the ready.

    11. Re:Needless to say... by AhtirTano · · Score: 1

      I don't know what you are talking about, Mr. Nay-Saying Anonymous Coward. I have been using Netflix for four years. I use three profiles--one for TV series, one for American movies, and one for foreign movies. I *always* get either the first or second item for all three lists.

      I do have my complaints with Netflix, though. The main one is the well-known fact that they throttle disk delivery. I understand why they do it from on economic perspective; but I don't think their practice matches their rhetoric. It annoys me, but not enough to stop. The reality of their service is fair, I think.

    12. Re:Needless to say... by aztektum · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually for a pirate, Blockbuster is the better deal (not that I have looked into this. I'm legit. Promise.)

      For 17.99 a month you get 3 by mail at once, unlimited by mail per month, PLUS you can take them into the store and trade each in for store flicks, and they STILL mail you your next 3.

      A pirate could kick ass on volume with Blockbuster. Not that I would ever look at it that way. I'm legit. Promise.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    13. Re:Needless to say... by GWBasic · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This means that even though the same total amount of renting happens, the movie studios see fewer dollars as a result.

      About a year ago, I stumbled into a forum where film makers were talking about current distribution trends. Apparently, Netflix is considered a major distribution venue, and is quite profitable for films that normally wouldn't see a wide distribution. Some independant filmmakers see Netflix as a godsend.

      There was some discussion on some of Netflix's constraints; Netflix will only carry DVDs that are at least 1 hour in length. This causes some documentary producers to stick 10-15 minutes of filler into a special edit for Netflix.

    14. Re:Needless to say... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The main one is the well-known fact that they throttle disk delivery.

      Yeah, there was a lawsuit over that, as I remember ... they lost.

      But I have Netflix too, and I agree with you: the GP is either full of it or just had extremely bad luck. I've had them for only six months or so, but have never failed to have the next three movies in the queue show up. Once they were about four days late, but that's not too bad (I mean, we're just talking about movies here not prescription meds or something like that.) The rest of the time it's about three days from when I drop the discs off and get the next ones.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    15. Re:Needless to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to say azt is correct. I've cleared 30 movies in a month. Could probably get even more but stealing movies is a time consuming process. And the best part is you don't have to worry about p2p networks (go steal your own movies you lazy bastards)

    16. Re:Needless to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netflix has over 85,000 titles, I like docu/indie/foreign films..and blockbuster's selection sucks.

    17. Re:Needless to say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you're a bit off the mark - they just raised the price on that plan from $17.99 to $24.99, and that is when I said "Bye-bye". Have I gone Netflix? Nope. I've gone "reading material"...I learn a lot of good stuff, and don't waste my evenings just watching crap.

      Funny - captcha is "nourish".

  3. Blockbuster lost my business by philmack · · Score: 5, Informative

    Blockbuster lost me (and several of my friends' accounts) to netflix when they recently did away with their in store exchanges unless you opted to pay like 30% more for the exact same service. I have to imagine that a lot of people did the same.

    1. Re:Blockbuster lost my business by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      The thing is, even with the reduced store exchanges, it's STILL a better deal than Netflix. So going to Netflix to hurt Blockbuster hurts you AND Blockbuster.

      I'm fine with Netflix but I really don't have that much of an option with Blockbuster, there aren't any that are nearby, I think it's 15 miles.

    2. Re:Blockbuster lost my business by willutah · · Score: 1

      Yeah - and they also stopped giving us the monthly coupon that was good for a free movie OR A FREE GAME RENTAL. That was a really nice part of the deal since it costs $7 or $8 to rent a game. Sure, now you can return a movie-in-an-envelope for a game discount, but it only discounts the game down to $5. Losing that really disappointed my kids (ok, I admit it, I was also bummed).

      So after the limit imposed on monthly rentals and the loss of the game coupon I reconsidered NetFlix, but I found that Blockbuster was still marginally a better deal, so reluctantly I'm still with them. It looks like they are gradually making the deal worse until they match Netflix. Too bad.

    3. Re:Blockbuster lost my business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They lost me a few years ago also. There was a deadbeat in town with the same first & last name as me, but looked nothing like me different middle initial, etc. I was constantly harassed by debt collectors trying to collect on this guys bounced checks, unpaid bills etc.

      At the time, if you forgot your card at blockbuster, they'd ask you your phone number and look you up. And I noticed some clerks would actually read off your phone number and ask if it was yours!! Apparently my evil twin forgot his card one day, at a store on the other end of town. Clerk apparently read him my number and he said sure, that's me! And then proceeded to rent half a dozen movies which he never returned.

      Fast forward a few weeks and I get a late fee notice for on the order of $200 for movies I never rented at a location I had never been to. Of course I go in and make a fuss about it, but their bottom line was that I had to pay the bill or be referred to collections. So I escalated, and eventually found myself sitting in the back room with the manager looking at their surveillance footage for the time of the transaction. The video wqas horrible - I have no idea how you could ever hope to identify anybody from it. But it was good enough to show that the person at the counter clearly wasn't me (I'm 6'5" and built like a pro linebacker - my evil twin was considerably smaller). So they wrote that one off. I ask them to cancel my card, and we'd get one in my wife's name - which is very unique. They said they couldn't cancel it - but they could put it "on-hold". What does it take to have it taken off of hold? Just go up to the counter and ask.

      Ok, so I put it on hold. Fast forward another few months and I get another notice, from a different location. We start the whole drill again - but now I have a "history" of doing this - despite the fact that they dropped the previous situation. So it gets more difficult, and they didn't want to drop it. And this store apparently didn't retain their surveillance tapes as long, or "couldn't find them". Eventually, after alot of letters, phone calls, etc., got it dropped also. What about that "hold". That only applies to the store you placed it in - my card was still active at every other store!

      So now I make a bigger fuss - I want my card GONE, deactivated, never to be used again. And they wouldn't or couldn't do it. I wrote letters all the way up the chain. And those holds - you have to show up in person, with your card to place a hold. And that's exactly what they suggested I do. Not sure whether they meant the local store, everywhere in the state, or everywhere in the country - but I told them to go to hell. Then I wrote one last letter to corporate and told them that I would no longer be responsible for any debts or charges made in my name on a blockbuster card. Had it notarized and delivered via certified mail. I still have my card, a copy of the letter & the return receipt at least 8 years later. I got several more late fee notices, and ignored them - and watched my credit report like a hawk. Nothing more has ever happened, and I haven't been to a blockbuster store sine. Though I'm tempted to drop by some time and see just how high the late fees are now!

    4. Re:Blockbuster lost my business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very doubtful whether it's a "better deal than Netflix." :-)

      I joined both around the time Blockbuster started their program (Nov 2004) => and built a spreadsheet called "Blockbuster vs. Netflix" that tracked exactly how many movies I received each month (including the two free ones at a local BB store) and computed the average cost/movie. After 6 months it was clear that BB was a bit lower in cost, and I was getting far too many movies with dual plans ... so we canceled Netflix in May 2005.

      However, BB's turnaround times were only "so so" --> and they would often let my queue show zero "shipped movies" for a day or two. I was considering a return to Netflix for those reasons, but in early 1996 this improved a good bit when they started including their stores as shipping points; and it was a BIG improvement when a few months later they allowed movies to be returned to the store with free rentals for each one [although it was sometimes difficult to find 3 movies I really wanted to see]. However ... this wasn't as spectacular a deal as it sounds, as I would often hold a movie for a day or so (until I got others to return) to avoid the 25 mile round-trip to Blockbuster (don't forget ... that alone costs $3 or so at today's gas prices). Plus, even though the movies show as "returned" in your queue as soon as the store receives them; BB still wasn't all-that-quick at shipping the replacements.

      Over time, BB kept modifying the plan ... supposedly to "improve" it; but the effect was really the opposite. First, they offered the option to switch from the 2 free coupons/month to one every week --> but the "every week" freebie would not include games or new releases (so I declined). Then, about four months ago they sent us a letter advising us of their new plans and informing me we had to choose one (as others have noted). So the in-store exchanges are now limited to 5 a month (unless you pay $26/month). But the turnaround time did not improve at all ==> I would often see 2 to 3 days between them receiving a movie and shipping a new one.

      End of my BB experience -- back to Netflix I went. Netflix (for the past 6 weeks since I rejoined) has NEVER let the "shipped movies" stay zero overnight. Their turnaround time is outstanding => if I mail a return on Monday, they receive it AND ship a replacement on Tuesday, and I'll get it on Wednesday (or at the worst Thursday). With that kind of turnaround I am easily averaging 3-4 more "cycles" per month with Netflix than with BB. At 3 movies/cycle that's 9-12 more movies per month ==> for $1.00 less than BB. Even with the 5 in-store exchanges BB includes, that's still 4-7 extra movies, and all of those (plus the 5 that compensate for the exchanges) are movies I WANTED to see ... not just whatever was available in store. Plus I don't have to drive to the BB store 3 or more times a month :-)

      While I don't really think about gas prices when I want to "run around", if you consider that Blockbuster would cost me $1.00 more/month; plus at least 3 trips to the store each month (a cost of about $9 just in gas), Netflix works out to be $10/month less expensive --> and I'm getting 4-7 more movies each month!! Sure sounds like a better value to me :-)

    5. Re:Blockbuster lost my business by eltonito · · Score: 1

      Did Blockbuster ever get off their high horse and start carrying quasi controversial movies, like The Last Temptation of Christ or started carrying unedited versions of foreign films, like Man Bites Dog? That's really why I went with Netflix, better selection and I get to see the actual movie.

  4. My only problem with neflix by schnikies79 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a subscription service and a brick and mortar blockbuster isn't.

    It would be nice if someone offered a service where I could just request a movie, pay my couple of bucks or whatever and have it mailed. If I didn't want anything that month then I wouldn't have to pay.

    --
    Gone!
    1. Re:My only problem with neflix by pappy97 · · Score: 4, Informative

      cafedvd.com offers the service you want, you rent by mail per DVD you actually watch, no subscription. Check it out. They call it "a la carte" renting.

    2. Re:My only problem with neflix by Wolfen_com · · Score: 1

      Intelliflix offers this, though I found them a little slow to mail the dvd's. But I guess you wouldn't care as much if you weren't paying for a subscription.

    3. Re:My only problem with neflix by Chysn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > It's a subscription service and a brick and mortar blockbuster isn't.

      The response to that is that Blockbuster's rates for new releases are ridiculous. It's been a while since I've used my Blockbuster account, so I might be a few percent off here, but Blockbuster is now charging close to $4.00 (USD) for DVD rentals. So you don't need to watch too many movies per month with Netflix to blow Blockbuster away for value.

      My experience with Netflix is that they're one of those rare businesses that keep exceeding my expectations.

      Downside: As an Ubuntu user, I'm S.O.L. on using their online viewing service. That's still IE-only.

      --
      --I'm so big, my sig has its own sig.
      -- See?
    4. Re:My only problem with neflix by schnikies79 · · Score: 1

      I rarely watch movies so I guess I'm not the right demographic but I agree 100% of the new release prices. A theater here is only $6.00 for a movie, and renting the dvd is $4.00, screw that.

      --
      Gone!
    5. Re:My only problem with neflix by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      It's been a while since I've used my Blockbuster account, so I might be a few percent off here, but Blockbuster is now charging close to $4.00 (USD) for DVD rentals.

      That cheap, huh? Last time I rented a movie at Blockbuster it was something like $6.50 after tax.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    6. Re:My only problem with neflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I know this is slashdot, but try going to the movie (or watching the rented one on your couch) with an actual girl. Movie: $12.00 for tickets, $9.00 for soda and popcorn. Home - $4.00 for DVD rental, $2.00 for soda and popcorn. Which one wins now? BTW, I just went to a movie yesterday at a theater during the "matinee" timeframe and it was $7.00 per ticket. It's more in the prime time.

    7. Re:My only problem with neflix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then you're lucky (or talking about matinee rates or something).. it most major areas (i.e., any big movie theater in a big city, major suburban areas) I've been in the last 5 years (NY, Boston, SF/Bay area), it's been at least $10, sometimes up to 10.50/11 now

    8. Re:My only problem with neflix by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Yup. The theater down the street from me is 10 bucks a ticket. On the other hand, it's a beautiful theater and they're showing fucking Blade Runner right now! : D

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    9. Re:My only problem with neflix by eln · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If I want to rent 3 videos from blockbuster for the weekend, I'm looking at spending the same amount of money I spend for an entire month of my Netflix 3-at-a-time deal. Then, if I'm running late on Monday morning and forget to return the movies, I get nailed for another 20 bucks in late fees. I haven't used my Blockbuster card in more than 2 years, and I have no particular desire to do so again. If I'm desperate to watch a particular (popular) movie right now, I can go to one of the $1 per movie automatic DVD kiosks that are sprouting up like mushrooms in every grocery store out there. Those things generally have just as good a selection as the local Blockbuster on any given day.

    10. Re:My only problem with neflix by bjorniac · · Score: 4, Funny

      How much for the girl?

    11. Re:My only problem with neflix by Wolfen_com · · Score: 1

      While I agree on the price, as far as I know, the late fees are pretty much a thing of the past. If you rent say a 2 day movie, they tell you it is due 2 days later of course. However looking at your receipt you will see you don't get charged any extra fees unless you keep it 1 week past the due date. At that point you either buy it for whatever amount is listed on the receipt, or if you return it within 30 days pay a $2.99 (I think) restocking fee.

    12. Re:My only problem with neflix by RulerOf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a subscription service and a brick and mortar blockbuster isn't.

      I couldn't help but notice while reading this article how ironic the seemingly universal praise for netflix is in light of your words... It's a subscription model, everyone seems to love it, and you don't get to keep the movies when you're done watching them, or when you cancel the service.

      Now, DRM issues aside (pretend it doesn't exist), why do we slashdotters go out of our way to praise netflix so, and then to continually bash other subscription based rental services from companies like Napster and Microsoft when they're doing almost exactly the same thing with better delivery times but only slightly different material? Do we, as consumers of this content, view both kinds so differently?

      --
      Boot Windows, Linux, and ESX over the network for free.
    13. Re:My only problem with neflix by spasm · · Score: 1

      you have to return cafedvd rentals within 8 days though - not quite the joy of never having to think about 'is it due?' from netflix.

      but yeah, it's a good service for someone who doesn't need a monthly stream of dvds but still wants access to a more eclectic range than ye old local video store.

    14. Re:My only problem with neflix by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      $12 for 2 tickets? Holy hell man. I my area, the average salary is something like $23,000 a year, and a prime-time ticket is $8.50 for the theater where you're about guaranteed to be stuck to the floor and stuck in the obese-ass seat.

    15. Re:My only problem with neflix by pappy97 · · Score: 1

      "you have to return cafedvd rentals within 8 days though - not quite the joy of never having to think about 'is it due?' from netflix." To me it is assumed that if someone wants a carte DVD renting by mail, they can't keep it as long as they want. After all, it doesn't make business sense to let a customer rent a movie for a couple bucks, keep it 6 months, and then return it with no additional fees. The OP wanted an a la carte service, and it seems like cafedvd is an option. Probably not the only option out there either.

  5. Blockbuster will die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when online rentals don't suck. The whole DVD rental market over mail/at store will die. netflix may survive depending on their online rental traction.

    1. Re:Blockbuster will die by Nullav · · Score: 1

      Another thing bound to eventually kill most rental chains is how so many seem to keep discs for as long as possible, long after they're scratched up to all hell and partially encased in strange crusts. It's not just a matter of speed, it's a matter of quality.

      --
      I just read Slashdot for the articles.
  6. Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The Blockbuster near me closed at the beginning of this year. The storefront was vacant until about 3 weeks ago, when a Halloween store set up shop there. I'm sure once that clears out the space will remain empty for another 6 months or so. And this is right in the middle of a good-size city. The nearest video store is about 2-1/2 miles away (again, this is in the middle of a city). The thing is that I don't even miss it. I've been screwed over enough by them. I don't use Netflix anymore either, but if they can help get rid of Blockbuster, then more power to them.

    1. Re:Good riddance by onefriedrice · · Score: 1

      Yup, my local Blockbuster is gone, too. The building is still vacant. Personally, I liked having it there; and I would never consider Netflix because it doesn't match my movie-watching style. Whenever I want to rent a movie to watch, it's always a spur-of-the-moment thing, and I only do it one or two weekends a month. There's still another Blockbuster in the next city over, though.

      --
      This author takes full ownership and responsibility for the unpopular opinions outlined above.
    2. Re:Good riddance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I generally have always disliked blockbuster, they always had a shittier selection than hollywood video or anyone else for that matter, I mean, I've been to little corner shops that have a better selection! I think the only things keeping them afloat until recently is their higher prices and the fact they're the only shop in town in some areas, and brand recognition.

      I used to like hollywood video until they start getting more expensive and some locations requiring you have a credit card for a credit check for membership.

      Netflix also has the advantage over these brick and mortar firms in the face of higher gas prices.

  7. Lost me on lame toned-down R rated movies by boguslinks · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Blockbuster lost me a long, long time ago, when I rented Reservoir Dogs and got the weak, edited, neutered version.

    The box may have been labeled, but hey, I should not have to carefully scrutinize the movie's package to ensure that it is the movie I intended to rent in all its glory.

    I don't even know if they still do that.

    1. Re:Lost me on lame toned-down R rated movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please explain specifically how it was different. I've seen this claim made many times, but anytime someone asks for an explanation of what was edited/censored, the person making the claim suddenly disappears. I'm not a fan of Blockbuster, but I've certainly never seen any hard evidence of editing/censoring movies.

    2. Re:Lost me on lame toned-down R rated movies by boguslinks · · Score: 1

      The part of the movie where Tarantino's character was shot was removed, I remember that for a fact (this was about 10 years ago) and I think there were other minor changes.

  8. Netflix confirms it! by Verte · · Score: 4, Funny

    Blockbuster is dead!

    --
    We at slashdot are scientists, specialists and kernel hackers. Your FUD will be found out.
    1. Re:Netflix confirms it! by Ep0xi · · Score: 0

      4 megs internal cache and no difference? let's gonna try quad cores

      --
      ?
  9. It would not be hard to beat netflix on-line... by (H)elix1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm a netflix cusomter - 4 CD's in three queues (child, bride, me). As a perk, they also let you have an hour/usd of streaming content each month. For me, that works out to ~24 hours a month. Great, right? Well, it only works in the States, so any gigs in Canada are right out.

    The chink in the armor is the selection. While they have a massive collection of DVDs, the streaming selection is really poor. I would not pay extra for it as it stands. At home, It looks about the same as a DVD on a high bandwidth connection - here for example, is a movie getting piped to a TV via my laptop. Bandwidth in hotels works better than I expected, and it is good enough for watching on a computer. I hear Blockbuster might have better selection... they should embrace the streaming!

    1. Re:It would not be hard to beat netflix on-line... by ickpoo · · Score: 1

      I used to be a regular customer at Blockbuster. We rented enough movies every month that we were Gold Members (not really sure what the difference is). Then the cable company rolled out an on demand video service. We basically stopped going to Blockbuster.

      --
      I am not a script! .Sig?
    2. Re:It would not be hard to beat netflix on-line... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      we were Gold Members (not really sure what the difference is)

      Is that an Austin Powers reference?

    3. Re:It would not be hard to beat netflix on-line... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to http://www.netflix.com/HowItWorks it is unlimited instant watching time at least for the promotional period

    4. Re:It would not be hard to beat netflix on-line... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the streaming also only works with Windows. I find it a bit annoying that they say it's a "Free service" with your subscription, so they can get around giving a discount to people who can't use it. But the mail-in service is worth $14/month to me.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  10. Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by llamalad · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Blockbuster's online offering is far superior to Netflix's.

    Netflix constantly sent me random movies from my queue instead of using anything remotely resembling the order I'd prioritized them in. IIRC, they were everntually sued for that.

    Blockbuster only seems to have tried that twice with me and a single email to their customer care address resolved that and got me an apology along with it.

    I can also drop my total access movies off at the local LackLuster and trade them for free in-store rentals. And they ship my next online rentals the next day.

    Not affiliated, just a happy customer.

    1. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by cblack · · Score: 1

      Likewise. My wife and I moved from netflix to blockbuster total access several months ago and have been quite happy. One thing that is really nice about the in-store trade (for those that don't know, you can return a movie to a local store in exchange for a free rental at that store) is that if you real feel like a particular movie RIGHT NOW you can go get it. In addition it is sometimes nice to browse new releases that you may not have put in your queue but still would like to see.

    2. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      Funny....my experience was the exact opposite: I had a much easier time finding the movies I wanted on Netflix than Blockbuster. I kept the blockbuster trial for 3 months (and got, IIRC, 3 free DVD coupons) and then ditched it and stuck with netflix.

      That was a few years ago, though, so maybe they've improved. Netflix usually has what I want and generally gets me the top item of my queue two days after I drop a disk in the mailbox, so I'm satisfied with them.

    3. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by The-Ixian · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have never tried Netflix, but I don't have anything bad to say about Blockbuster's online service.
      I had the $30/mo plan for about a year and always got the movie that was next in my queue in 2 days or less. I never ran into any kind of limit or miscommunication.
      I ultimately canceled the service because I felt that I had tapped out what I found interesting.

      --
      My eyes reflect the stars and a smile lights up my face.
    4. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by AdrianZ · · Score: 1

      Same for me. Blockbuster would send me the most obscure and probably least watched films in my queue rather than the items at the top and in the year I was a member I never once received anything in my queue that had been labeled "short wait", "long wait", etc. I'm guessing it probably looks for what is the least likely to interfere with other subscribers if your top picks aren't immediately available, so everybody's queue would be different.

      Browsing the store was fun, but after 6 months, it really did feel like I had seen everything of interest to me there.

      So far Netflix has sent everything in queue order... but I just joined so we'll see.

    5. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I've done Netflix for at least a year now and I've never seen them send me anything that's farther down the list than #2, unless they are sending two discs on the same day, then it's at worst #2 and #3, because #1 might be out.

      I think we may need to recognize that there may be some regional differences in both services. My local Netflix center is very good.

    6. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never received a movie out of order on Netflix but I joined after the lawsuit. At the time I read that people who receive movies out of order are the super heavy users of Netflix. E.g. people with the 3 movies out at a time plan who manage to watch 25 movies in a month. On the other hand people who watch only 2 or 3 movies a week are considered preferred customers and almost always get their first choice and get their movies mailed first. I fall into the later category and my movies always arrive the next day. I've never had to wait for a new release.

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11262292/

    7. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I have never seen Blockbuster have a larger selection of DVDs than Netflix. I started as a Blockbuster subscriber back in my younger days, but then simply stopped because their selection was just so small. So for a few years I simply didn't rent movies. Then sometime last year I decided to try out Netflix, and was floored by the amount of available DVDs. I signed up, and within a few days, I'd already put over 400 DVDs in my queue.

      I still check Blockbuster's site from time to time, just to see what they have to offer, but the fact that it always seems to pale in comparrison (and the fact that whenever I see a Blockbuster commercial saying "rent movie X exclusively at Blockbuster" I immediately turn around, pull up Netflix, and low-and-behold, movie X is available through Netflix as well), I've never seen a reason to go back.

      And I can't say I've ever received a movie that was not within the top 3 listings in my queue, but YMMV.

      (And I'm sure my viewing habits say something about being a couch potato, but eh :P)

    8. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by Fozzyuw · · Score: 1

      I've was Netflix customer for a pretty good time. I was using it not long after they started. I then stopped and rejoined both Netflix and Blockbuster online at the same time. It was a good ability to see the difference. Long story short, I find I get much better use of money from Blockbuster. It use to be better, but they recently changed their subscription packages (less movies a month, higher cost, removed their free monthly coupon for movie/game). Still, it's a far better deal for me, why? I get about double the movies than Netflix.

      For $30/month I get 3 movies at a time. Those 3 movies can then be returned at a local store for 3 free in-store rentals. Your next movies will be shipped the next day*. There's no shipping delay in shipping movies back. I receive movies pretty much within 1 business day of having shipped. That might be due to being only 3.5 hours from Chicago (by car), which is one of their hubs.

      With that said, it's also only worth it if you have a local store near by. If you cannot trade your movies in for free rentals, it's just not worth it to Netflixs. Otherwise, comparing the "service" of both services is about the same. I've received the occasional wrong DVD from getting Disc 4 instead of Disc 2 or even just completely obscure random movie. I've also received completely cracked DVD's from both services. I don't mean scratched (those on occasion as well, more so from Netflix for some reason) but DVD's that where cracked in half, 2-pieces.

      Other systems offered the ability for me to go online and just "report a problem" and they'll reship or ship another DVD the next day.

      As for contacting. I find Netflix very difficult to contact or get a response from. I'm not the only one. Right now, I have a co-worker who's a big Netflix user while we often compare services and trade movie advice. I found that Blockbuster was a lot easier to contact. I've often contacted them about bugs on their website (as a web developer) and other misspellings or suggestions and usually get a nice thank you email with partially a copy/paste statement and part direct response from a person.

      As for their website, Netflix is significantly better. It just runs a LOT better. I don't know how the hell programmed the Blockbuster Online one but it is ASS slow when trying to make updates to the Queue. I can say that their AJAX skills are NOT strong and they must be doing the slowest possible DOM operations to do something as simple as change a number ordering. It's slow in Firefox and IE7/6, so it's likely not browser specific. There recommendation system for Blockbuster online isn't as good either. Nor is their search functionality. It's not the worst, but it might take 2 search attempts to find what you're looking for.

      For selection, Netflix is definitely better... better if you like obscure indie films. They're pretty much going to have any American film you could want, but if you start looking for foreign films and indie films, you might find that Blockbuster just doesn't have it.

      On a side note, it IS annoying to get that stupid Blockbuster associate (that one that loves to talk too much and think it's some kind of excellent service) that insists that those with Blockbuster Online should sign up for the in-store package as well to spend another $/month to "get one more free movie". As he put it "People love to do it just for the free movie". Yeah, there was something wrong with that guy.

      So sum it all up? Blockbuster is better for those with a local store near by, Netflix is better if it's really important to find some occasional obscure movies. The website performance is annoying but you will only spend a small amount of time on it to add a few things to your queue. I've been throttled by both companies in the past. I can say that with Blockbuster online, It's pretty common for me to rent 40+ movies a month for $30 (including in-store rentals). I've slowed down a bit now to about 33/month. However, actually paying the ridiculous prices they ask for at a brick/mortar BB store? No way. I'm not spending $5 for a one-night movie rental when there's other rental stores I can rent from for $1-2.

      Cheers,
      Fozzy

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    9. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny
      i have the five at a time unlimited plan for $30/month.
      i can get 15 movies a week from them if i wish too, and have many weeks.

      i live in des moines iowa where i have the following distribution centers within 1 day shipping.
      Des Moines, IA
      Omaha, NE
      Kansas City, MO
      Cedar Rapids, IA
      Minneapolis, MN

      so the idea that i cannot get my #1 request is ludicrous and untrue.

      The only time I do not is when its a brand new release and i simply got the next one in line.
      Of course, the big "LONG WAIT" tag in the queue for that movie might have been a clue that it might not make it here as my #1 choice.

      As to the selection, its a night and day difference, and not just for "indie films" and "import films".

      I've found many movies on netflix that Blockbuster will never have.
      BB is for the person who basically wants hollywood latest and greatest and can be bothered to go get a new movie versus simply having a rolling selection coming into their home all week.

    10. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never once in 3 years had Netflix send something out of order unless there was something just plain unavailable. Not once. Astroturf?

    11. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt by AusIV · · Score: 1

      I can also drop my total access movies off at the local LackLuster and trade them for free in-store rentals. And they ship my next online rentals the next day.

      This is the key for me. I've not used Netflix, but I haven't run across many (if any) movies that I wanted that I couldn't find on Blockbuster online. But honestly, the movie I want to watch tends to depend on my mood, so if I've got a couple of DVD's from blockbuster lying around, and don't feel like watching either of them, I can go to blockbuster, trade them in for something that fits my mood, add it back to the top of my queue and watch it another time. A strictly online store can't compete with that.

      I've never had any problem getting movies from the top of my queue. Sometimes they'll send me something three or four items down the queue, but I've never had it more than that. I would guess that's largely a function of locale though, (for Netflix or Blockbuster).

  11. Damn by dedazo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I swore to myself that I'd never use Netflix because of the fact that they invented the pop-under along with the assholes at X10. This is bad news. But I still think they're better than NF, even with the 5-exchange limit... namely because Netflix gives me exactly zero in-store exchanges for the same online subscription price.

    Their website sucks (while Netflix's is fantastic), but they still have a larger catalog. I've never had any throttling problems at all. I hope they don't go under. I have something like 600 movies in my queue and no way in hell to pull it out without some nasty screen scraping...

    --
    Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    1. Re:Damn by torkus · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess that's the preference it comes down to. Do you like to go to the store and trade your movies or do you like to drop them in the mail and get the next one (or batch) in 2 days?

      I'll stuff 8 DVDs in my mailbox monday and have the next 8 from my queue on wednesday. For me, that's perfect. I'm not sure what you don't find in Netflix's catalog, but i've found everything i've gone looking for. THey even have obscure things like random yoga videos, foreign and B movies...

      --
      You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
    2. Re:Damn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like that Netflix lets me create separate queues for family members and lets me change plans very easily. We rent a lot of horror in October, and I can add a disk and start a queue just for those movies (so I don't interrupt my regular stuff). Or, when there is a TV series I want to watch, I tend to watch it pretty much constantly, so I'll increase the number of disks so I always have an episode to watch.

    3. Re:Damn by lubricated · · Score: 2, Insightful

      neither blockbuster nor netflix offer porn.

      --
      It has been statistically shown that helmets increase the risk of head injury.
    4. Re:Damn by davburns · · Score: 1

      For a long time, my friends kept raving about netflix, but I wouldn't have anything to do with them because of those popunders. I was so happy when blockbuster came out with their service; I'd hate to see them go away. I probabably make tons of money for blockbuster. I pay my money each month, but only watch about 3 movies. I should spend less time in Second Life.

      Of course, the future is going to be in downloadable movies. But that either means buying them or DRM, or both. I guess we might hope to buy them cheap?

    5. Re:Damn by dedazo · · Score: 2, Funny

      must not... make comment... about... nickname... *gasp*

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    6. Re:Damn by Wescotte · · Score: 1

      I swore to myself that I'd never use Netflix because of the fact that they invented the pop-under along with the assholes at X10. Can you elaborate on this pop-under along with the assholes at X10? I have no idea what you're talking about...

    7. Re:Damn by Deliri...uhmmm · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://www.netflixforporn.com/ Here's the pr0n version.

    8. Re:Damn by maryjanecapri · · Score: 1

      i was a victim of throttling. i switched to blockbuster and haven't had that problem since. i have had other problems. like them dropping my account when they raised their rates. but over all i am much more satisfied with blockbuster online than i was with netflix.

      --
      nature loves variety::society hates it get your variety at http://www.monkeypantz.net
    9. Re:Damn by dedazo · · Score: 1

      Where were you in the early days of the pop-under craze? You couldn't open a friggin' web page without having a window open with a Netflix or X10 ad.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
    10. Re:Damn by Castar · · Score: 1

      Try GreenCine. If you're on the west coast, it's as fast as Netflix, with a lot better selection of obscure/indie films (and porn).

      And they're not evil.

      --
      I yearn for you tragically. A. T. Tappman, Chaplain, U.S. Army.
    11. Re:Damn by dedazo · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the rec, I'll check them out.

      --
      Web2.0: I love when people Flickr my cuil and digg my boingboing until my google is reddit and I start to yahoo
  12. NO WAI! by sqrt(2) · · Score: 2, Informative

    Who could have seen that coming. Netflix is even more convenient (for me) than downloading movies illegally, there's just no way a dinosaur like Blockbuster could keep up. By not actually having a physical location, Netflix can have a MUCH wider selection of titles too, and when your only limit is how many movies you can have out at one time you can watch a lot more content and take chances on things you might not have looked at otherwise. This is why I have no sympathy for the music industry when they say they can't compete with illegal downloads. Netflix does it (and does very well), by offering a better service at a reasonable price.

    --
    If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    1. Re:NO WAI! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is something great about wanting to see a movie and going to get it right when I want it as opposed to having to wait for it to come in the mail. Plus, netflix used to send my queue all out of order screwing so many things up when you are trying to watch tv shows sequentially.

    2. Re:NO WAI! by sqrt(2) · · Score: 1

      If I really want to see a movie I'll move it to the front of my queue, if I'm really desperate I'll get the torrent, I can usually wait though. The order of your queue can get a little jumbled, especially for popular things because they try and send it out in order, but if there's none available it goes to the next title so I can see how that'd be a problem for TV shows. I get those from BT as they air (usually a few hours before actually) so that's not a problem.

      --
      If you build it, nerds will come. Soylentnews.org
    3. Re:NO WAI! by kongit · · Score: 0

      Well I have some sympathy, to get good quality movies you have to download 1GB files or larger, for songs you can get a whole album with decent encoding at 80-100MB, and you can get individual songs too...

      I think that piracy will never end, but companies need to make people want to pay rather then pirate, like in netflix' case it is easier and less time consuming to use their service to get movies that you want compared to piracy. While it takes a day or too to get a movie in the mail, usually that is less time then it takes to use bittorrent for a movie, and with bittorrent running I cant play tf2.

  13. Amazingly... by whystopnow · · Score: 5, Insightful
    ...Netflix lowered monthly subscriptions a month or so ago. Sent me a letter saying "we're dropping your monthly subscription cost by a dollar and adding streaming movies."

    First time in my life a subscription service has gotten cheaper.

    1. Re:Amazingly... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I love Netflix....

      I even bought stock. Why? Because, I once exclaimed if I owned a $1,000 of Netflix stock and were they to go belly up (back when media was saying doomed to die) that I'd actually be more bummed about losing the service than the cash.

      Of note, I've dropped cable/sat and pretty much feast on Netflix+iTunes. Netflix's online offerings are more limited but quality is usually much better than iTunes downloads; and quicker start times. iTunes gives me more current TV shows. Netflix gives me all my movies.

      (I didn't buy much stock cause I'm not rich, but I found out I could buys stocks via my Simple IRA at work.)

      Many people complain about the poor selection of movies on Netflix's "Watch It Now" but I think it's ingenius. They're working out all the kinks of the system and offering mainly "B" series and movies. (That said you can find some real gems. I've finally catching up on the Sliders episodes I missed.) But this keeps demand low and allows them to see how the system handles. Allows for a live working "non-beta" without a nightmare IT problem.

    2. Re:Amazingly... by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > Netflix lowered monthly subscriptions a month or so ago

      Blockbuster followed up and did exactly the same. Blockbuster's queue is far better than Netflix's too -- you get the movies in the order you queued them, almost no exceptions.

      Their system for series dvds is kind of buggy though -- I got disc 2 of The Prisoner full series before disc 1, returned it, and I've never seen another one from it since, it shows as unavailable in my queue. Another couple series items had similar problems -- once it gave me an out-of-order item, it became unavailable forever. Maybe they're just losing all their series dvds?

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    3. Re:Amazingly... by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      I have never gotten a movie out of order on Netflix, but then, I've never tried to rent recent blockbusters. But of all the TV series I have in my queue (which are handled exactly like other movies, sounds like they're handled differently on BB), I've never gotten anything but the first in the queue mailed to me.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    4. Re:Amazingly... by rho · · Score: 1

      Many people complain about the poor selection of movies on Netflix's "Watch It Now" but I think it's ingenius. They're working out all the kinks of the system and offering mainly "B" series and movies.

      Not really. I'm watching Heroes through "Watch it Now". It's keeping up with the current season.

      Of note, I've dropped cable/sat and pretty much feast on Netflix+iTunes. Me too. I know a couple folks who do that. I still have cable modem Internet service, though. I pay Comcast $50/month so I can pay $24/month to Netflix to have movies and TV shows streamed and mailed to me. You'd think they'd put two and two together.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    5. Re:Amazingly... by PortHaven · · Score: 1

      They have current Heroes?

      I've been watching it on NBC's site (but the player isn't as nice).

  14. Re:Don't they have a similar service now by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You're dead one with the comment about selection. That's why, in the end, the in-store exchange didn't matter to us. It took a surprisingly short time to rent every movie they had there that looked interesting. They hardly ever actually had anything in there that we specifically wanted to watch. It shouldn't surprise me too much, after all they're named "blockbuster". Indi, foreign, low budget, old, obscure, documentaries, just plain weird shit, etc etc aren't what springs to mind when that title comes up. Still pretty disappointing though.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  15. What rock have editors/bloggers been living under? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Netflix May Already Be Killing Blockbuster?


    What rock have editors/bloggers been living under? This may have been news say...4 years ago. Blockbuster launched a service like Netflix in 2004-ish (that's 3 years ago) and since then, well since then who cares, because pretty much everyone I know switched over to, um, digital downloads.

    Seriously, a Netflix PR blog-vert in 2007?
  16. Re:You know what that summary reads like? by empaler · · Score: 1
    It does indeed, except the summary does not invoke Netcraft, but the more authoritative "blogger at C|Net". When "a blogger at C|Net" has Opinions, especially about a billion-dollar corporation and the future earnings of said corporation, I'm all ears.

    And due to its size and outdated corporate culture, there really is no salvation for Blockbuster at this point.
    Like from G-ds unto C|Net, from C|Net unto Slashdot, and from Slashdot unto us.
  17. Re:What rock have editors/bloggers been living und by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is official; Netflix now confirms: Blockbuster is dying

    One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Blockbuster community when HDVDBVD confirmed that Blockbuster market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all Viewers. Coming close on the heels of a recent Netflix survey which plainly states that Blockbuster has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Blockbuster is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent MPAA comprehensive networking test.

    You don't need to be a Buttwagon to predict Blockbuster's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Blockbuster faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Blockbuster because Blockbuster is dying. Things are looking very bad for Blockbuster. As many of us are already aware, Blockbuster continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.

    All major surveys show that Blockbuster has steadily declined in market share. Blockbuster is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If Blockbuster is to survive at all it will be among DVD dilettante dabblers. Blockbuster continues to decay. Nothing short of a cockeyed miracle could save Blockbuster from its fate at this point in time. For all practical purposes, Blockbuster is dead.

    Fact: Blockbuster is dying

  18. Some companies deserve to die. by Morky · · Score: 2

    My last visit to Blockbuster was about five years ago when I returned a DVD a week late and they charged me significantly more than if I had simply rented the video for that period.

    1. Re:Some companies deserve to die. by canajin56 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The best part was when they doubled their late fees, and advertised it as "NO LATE FEES" then in microscopic print "because we doubled the late fees and renamed them restocking fees"

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    2. Re:Some companies deserve to die. by Bellum+Aeternus · · Score: 1

      Guess it depends where you live. Here they charge you the full (I mean buying a new one at Borders price - $25 to $35) to buy the movie if it's 7 days late. On the upside you get to keep it...

      --
      - I voted for Nintendo and against Bush
    3. Re:Some companies deserve to die. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a movie out about 5 years ago that I had rented for a week. Two days after I checked it out, they changed their policy so that movies with the sticker of the one I had downloaded only went out for three days. I brought it back on time according to my receipt, but they charged me a rather large late fee (which I never paid, thus ending my Blockbuster membership).

    4. Re:Some companies deserve to die. by spicyhamster · · Score: 1

      umm, we have no late fees and the restocking fee is $1.00. at least for me, blockbuster is ten times better than netflix. and cheaper =)

    5. Re:Some companies deserve to die. by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      Heh, I own like 5 dvds my roommate flat out kept from blockbuster (he probably never went back or something) and then left in the apartment when he moved.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    6. Re:Some companies deserve to die. by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Pundits like to indentify a single source, but is it seldom so simple. Single sources make for good case studies, which make for good sales, but this is not reality. Reality is that at blockbuster you can get the latest movie on the way home, but perhaps you don't have time to return it for a week. Reality is that I can own most most movies for around $15-$20 from any store, or have then delivered for less in a couple days. The reality is that blockbuster did it's best to kill the rental business by killing every competitor. A single supplier commodity market is not viable as there is no one to fill in the holes.

      Blockbuster was so susceptible to netflix because it was not has been in customer service oriented position in years. It base philosophy stems from the renting of trash containers to commercial interests, not serving end users. Blockbuster sets terms and conditions that will generate profits through brute force, not finesse sales through customer satisfaction.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    7. Re:Some companies deserve to die. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't think that makes any sense you need to have your head looked at.

    8. Re:Some companies deserve to die. by onx · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you say is wrong. They did get rid of late fees, and it's a lot cheaper for the consumer. Instead of charging you the price to rent the item if you exceed the rental period ($5 on a two day rental, so if you keep it for a week you pay $5 to rent it and then $15 in late fees) what they do is after the rental period, and a grace period (of at least 6 days on everything) they charge the price of the item to your account (which means it charges to whatever credit card you have linked to your account). If you then bring it back in time (within 30 days of the charge date) they refund the price of the item up to $1.25 which they call a "restocking fee".

      Now you can bitch and moan about restocking fees all you want, but to say that $1.25 for an extra 30 days costs you more than $5 for an extra 2 days is completely ridiculous. Yes, the old draconian LackLuster late fee model was pure evil; they were afraid of losing a huge chunk of their business due to Netflix (and a general hatred of Blockbuster), and as a result they replaced it.

      The one thing that might still be pure evil about their new model is that if you don't return a disc from a TV series, they charge you for the price of the whole series. For example if you don't return disc 1 of "Band of Brothers" they charge you a ridiculous $80, which to be fair is the actual price of the band of brothers box set. However, recently they seem to have shifted away even from this...it seems now the most they will charge you for a disc not returned for a TV show is $10 (although I think this only applies to TV shows they got on DVD in the last few months, so heroes will only cost you $10, but BoB will still be $80).

      Blockbuster's real problem though, is that its inventory system was designed by a 3 year old, and their computer system was designed in the '80s (literally). The new CEO promised that he would fix the inventory system so that stores in the Midwest wouldn't get 500 copies of "Brokeback Mountain" while a store in San Fransisco would get only 50 copies. When you ask the guy behind the counter at Blockbuster if they have a movie...he can't tell you with any reasonable certainty. Once he finally navigates the computer system that is older than he is to find what you were asking for, only to see that his store doesn't carry it, he has absolutely no way to find out if a nearby store has it without calling them and having them repeat the process. He also can't tell you if they carry it online. What can he do if they "might" have it? Help you look...and a good portion of the time he wont be able to find it even if it should be in stock. There are so many other things wrong with Blockbuster it's amazing, but the summary was right on when it said they seem unlikely to change significantly.

  19. in ireland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    i work for a small company that writes rental software for video shops. we have about 100+ locations where our software is installed.

    over the past few years there have been a lot of closures of video shops as various net rental services come online. i personally reckon the main thing to kill the market is bittorrent as the average consumer is now sufficently capable of downloading movies with the greater availability of broadband.

    while the online rental locations have started to appear in the past few years the size of their operations is not comparable to the dip in the sales at brick and mortar operations.

    that said how can they still compete?

    some of our customers are now doing more business with internet cafes/gaming/voip/tanning salons/dvd sales more than dvd/games rentals. our software has had a lot of changes to cover these changes. one chain has closed a few shops but has also opened a few in new locations.

    others have specialised. my favourite is one small chain of 3-4 shops that specialises in world cinema/cult movies. they have an incredibly loyal customer base who don't walk in and look on the shelves for a film. they come in and ask at the counter for a specific film. while most shops have a high staff turnover this chain still has the same staff it did 10 years ago for the most part. they hunt out all these films for their customers.

    1. Re:in ireland by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      while the online rental locations have started to appear in the past few years the size of their operations is not comparable to the dip in the sales at brick and mortar operations.

      Interesting. How many titles are being rented by the online services per month, and how large is that dip in the brick & mortar rentals? I'd be curious to know the exact figures here (and I assume you have those, since you'd need to in order to make that comparison).

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  20. Which one gives the people what they want? by Scrameustache · · Score: 0

    Is netflix offering censored versions only?
    Because, last I checked, the other guys had policies about family values and whatnot.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:Which one gives the people what they want? by nuzak · · Score: 1

      > Because, last I checked, the other guys had policies about family values and whatnot.

      Maybe 10 years ago. Sure as hell isn't the case now. Got the unrated Requiem for a Dream there years ago. I almost wish I got the edited version.

      The bad guy you're looking for now is Wal-mart.

      --
      Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
    2. Re:Which one gives the people what they want? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With rare exceptions, Netflix offers only one edition (or an unpredictable selection from among those that have been published) of any given motion picture (what they carefully call a "title"). They obviously made a simplifying business decision to pretend that "title" is the only concept that customers will be allowed to think in terms of. If you are interested in a particular edition, you are out of luck.

    3. Re:Which one gives the people what they want? by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      I bought the newest Nine Inch Nails CD at WalMart. They usually say 'edited' in the title on the outer label if it's been censored. The NIN album didn't have any marking. Maybe Trent is just reaching middle age...

  21. Not just Blockbuster by Scareduck · · Score: 1

    The Hollywood Video near us just closed up. Brick-and-mortar retail video rental is a dead letter.

    --

    Dog is my co-pilot.

    1. Re:Not just Blockbuster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i doubt it. if you have a sudden urge to see a particular movie, are you going to wait til netflix sents one to you? personally, i like having the convenience to just drive down to my local rental place and pick one up right then and there.

      i don't believe brick and mortars will be dead until we can get broadband fast enough and cheap enough to stream movies directly to our t.v.'s.

    2. Re:Not just Blockbuster by ElvisGump · · Score: 0

      I got the new "Spiderman 3" Tuesday by mail from Netflix after having only thought to put at the top of my queue last Saturday.

      I have found that putting new releases to the top of my queue a week or so before they are released and making sure I get a return timed so it gets back on Monday I almost always get the new release on Tuesday.

      I know I've had better luck getting the latest release this way from Netflix than I ever seemed to by going to Blockbuster after work on Tuesdays when all the slackers had cleaned off the shelves on new movie Tuesday before 5pm.

  22. I'd consider blockbuster... by LOTHAR,+of+the+Hill · · Score: 1

    if they're monthly subscriptions were for in-store exchanges. Movie renting for me is a spontaneous thing. I rent movies the day I want to see it. I don't want to wait a couple days for a movie, there simply isn't anything i want to see that badly.

    Blockbuster is ignoring it's strongest asset. The brick and morter is the best thing they have going for them, and they refuse to capitalize on it.

    1. Re:I'd consider blockbuster... by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 1

      The brick and morter is the best thing they have going for them, and they refuse to capitalize on it.

      Well you have to look at it from their side of things. To have a brick and mortar store means having significantly higher costs than the Netflix model. Costs like paying retail employee wages (along with any benefits, insurance, and training costs of having them there), property tax, utilities, etc, etc. It's no wonder that they're not investing in their retail infrastructure anymore, they may as well be throwing their money down a rat hole.

      --
      God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
  23. Other alternatives: by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 2, Informative

    I rent my videos from Redbox.com. I don't rent enough movies to really justify spending on a Netflix subscription and the idea of depending $4.50 on a DVD rental is absolutely preposterous. For $1 + tax I get to watch a DVD--a just price for someone who watches movies as infrequently as I do.

    ...and no, it doesn't run Linux...but it could.

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    1. Re:Other alternatives: by colfer · · Score: 1

      That's $1/night. A Redbox machine is in the grocery store next door to Blockbuster here. I feel bad for the BB employees when I rent from the robot. The selection is pretty limited, new movies only - which is exactly what is expensive at BB (movies stay on the "new" shelf for 1 year). But it does have some semi-non-mainstream stuff like "Children of Men".

    2. Re:Other alternatives: by WedgeTalon · · Score: 1

      I actually rent *MORE* movies with redbox than I ever did before (with either Netflix or Blockbuster).

    3. Re:Other alternatives: by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 1

      True, true. Even though I don't watch many movies, for a buck I'm willing to give some a chance that I normally wouldn't.

      --
      We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
  24. Exactly - I never plan on signing onto Netflix by Travoltus · · Score: 1

    I can go to the Blockbuster store with my online rental packaging and use that to rent 3 new free in-store rentals AND also get 3 more free online rentals (although you pay the monthly fee, blah blah) when the brick and mortar store returns my DVDs. That's right - three online rentals can generate six free rentals in return.

    Netflix, can you ever hope to match that?

    I'm going to be pissed if my consumer choice is ruined and I can't get the service I get now because of this "competition".

    When Netflix is the only show in town, their customers will come to regret it.

    --
    --- Grow a pair, liberals... stop letting the Republicans bully you!
    1. Re:Exactly - I never plan on signing onto Netflix by daeg · · Score: 1

      It depends entirely on your local Blockbuster and on your movie tastes. If you like harder-to-find titles, most Blockbusters aren't the way to go. The ones around here are awful in that respect. Any major movie buff will quickly run out of quality titles at a Blockbuster. Their online service might be better -- but at that point, why bother with them over Netflix?

    2. Re:Exactly - I never plan on signing onto Netflix by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Speaking of hard-to-find titles, your post triggered a memory of Ice Pirates - so I added it to the top of my NF Q.

      Thanx!! :-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  25. They have a grandfather clause by Honor · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've had Blockbuster Total Access since right before they started the in-store exchanges. Which I love, by the way - I get to watch the movies I can't get in store, and when I want to rent a movie last-minute, all I have to do is take the envelope into the store and get any rental for free. They even give out a coupon every month for a free in-store rental - or a free game rental, which is what I always use it on. But anyway... When Blockbuster started limiting the number of in-store rentals, it was for new customers only. I got a nice letter from them saying hey, we are upping our prices, and putting a limit on in-store rentals, but since you already had an account with us, your price doesn't go up and you get to keep your unlimited rentals. So anyway, thats why I like Blockbuster over Netflix, and why the parent poster should have kept his/her account, since it wasn't affected by the new policy.

    1. Re:They have a grandfather clause by saw · · Score: 1

      We'll, we were a customer from well before the start of total access and were getting two rental coupons a month. We didn't get grandfathered in. They said if we didn't pick a new plan, they would drop us. We let Blockbuster drop us.

    2. Re:They have a grandfather clause by AdrianZ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We were in the same boat and had the 3 disc plan. I had even been dissing my Netflix friends because they couldn't just go pick up a new film when they were finished with theirs. Then one day I was told at the store I reached my exchange limit. "Limit? What limit?" "You received a letter explaining it a few weeks ago." "No, I didn't." "Sorry" I then went home, joined Netflix, and cancelled my blockbuster plan.

      I do miss in in-store pickups and just browsing the selection in person. Though, I had NCIS Season 1 on my Blockbuster #1 spot for a year (no, really... and 3 tech support tickets didn't change anything). Added it to my new Netflix account when I created the account. Just after I finished canceling my Blockbuster account, Netflix Shipping emailed me that those same DVDs Blockbuster couldn't give me for a year, had shipped.

      Their huge losses explain the problem though, clearly they aren't putting resources toward the logistics or suggestion systems.

    3. Re:They have a grandfather clause by jedaustin · · Score: 1

      The same thing happened for me. While I miss being able to return the online movies to the store to swap for another movie it had me watching a lot of crappy movies because I'd either seen everything good or nothing was in stock.
      Every deal with Blockbuster was short lived.. they'd raise the rate or change the rules after I signed up. I don't feel a complete lack of trust towards Netflix like I did with Blockbuster.
      The turn around is faster with Netflix too.

  26. Re:Don't they have a similar service now by siriuskase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If they had a system where the top items in my queue were in the store when I returned a DVD, it seems that would beat the service I get from Netflix. They don't need to always have MovieC in inventory, but if it is near the top of my queue, they can arrange to have it in stock, then after I rent and return it, they can send it off to wherever else it might be wanted. All the stores in a region could share the less popular movies. And I rent a lot of TV series. You don't even need to look at my queue to know what I will want next since I watch each season in order, and if I like the show, I watch the seasons in order, too. A system like that would easily beat Netflix since the transit time would be shorter.

    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  27. In their own words by nedder · · Score: 1

    No more late fees.

  28. Corporate vs. Franchise by JimboFBX · · Score: 3, Informative

    Back in Pullman, WA, I found blockbuster online really helpful. Everything about it was great, and the fact that NetFlix told me Star Trek V (for RiffTrax) was "soon available" and then a week passed without ever sending it didn't help NetFlix's case either. Then I moved to a larger city where all of the blockbusters were franchise within a 100 miles. Their "two night rental" was actually a "next day rental", they had late fees, they stopped accepting blockbuster online's coupons for free game rentals (7.50 to rent a game...), when I did have a free rental coupon, they wouldn't allow me to write down the code and simply present that to them- I had to print it out as well, and finally their selection was worse. When I asked why they were so crappy, they answered "Sorry, you probably were renting from a corporate blockbuster- and all the ones around here are franchise". I quickly canceled my blockbuster online subscription, mostly because I could no longer get a free game rental and because Red Box ($1/night) has come around and proven to both be superior to Blockbuster and Netflix when your primary interest is new releases.

    Sadly, within two weeks of showing up, Red Box put the local Movie Gallery out of business, which had been my blockbuster replacement for games. Now I'm not sure where to rent games anymore.

    1. Re:Corporate vs. Franchise by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Gamefly.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  29. Blockbuster lost me when... by safiel · · Score: 1

    they stopped stocking more then just new release movies in their stores, and not many cases of 'guaranteed to be in stock' new titles. Back before I called it quits for them, I'd make a list of movies I'd wanted to watch. The list would be maybe 8 movies with new releases, old ones, different genera's and NONE of them would be in stock. I'd leave the store empty handed, and for some reason very angry.

    Now a days, even if you find the movie you want it's probably only for sale and not to rent.! You're blockbuster, you're telling me I can't rent the used movies you have in stock!

    1. Re:Blockbuster lost me when... by krray · · Score: 1

      Blockbuster lost me when I went to rent another movie (many many years ago) and I was returning a very late movie at the same time. The thing that got me the most was that the movie wasn't all that good and I didn't even finish watching it -- I was just busy with life / work and forgot about it (my bad).

      I ended up at the counter with the manager and the late fee being requested far exceeded the retail cost of the movie (which was available -- it wasn't some new release). I offered to buy it which was refused. They wanted their late fee.

      I simply excused myself to "think about it" -- and walked to the corner of the store to stew for a moment. Then called the credit card company with my cell phone and reported my card as lost. Knowing that I had moved the address they had on file was also incorrect. The reason I probably didn't get their reminder phone call is they (as everyone else I don't want to hear from as such) get one of my ISDN circuit numbers (outbound phone, backup Internet :) -- 847.854.0048

      I walked back up to the counter and put the movie and my membership card down. Let the gal know that the address they had wouldn't reach me, the credit card they had on file was DOA, and that since they wouldn't except my offer to buy the movie they get $-0- and just lost a customer. Go ahead and attempt to put it into collections and I'd happily fight it in court if they ever found me. I've never heard from them, have seen no such indication on my credit reports over the years of a unpaid debt, nor have ever been back.

      I used to rent 2-3 movies per week on average...

    2. Re:Blockbuster lost me when... by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      I had a video store ask for my fucking tax file number once (it's like your SS number). I informed them they dont' have the right to, and that i was sure the tax office would be interested in knowing they were collecting tax file numbers.

      needless to say the dumb pimply clerk at the desk looked at me like a rabbit in the headlights of a bus.

      late fee's are bullshit, and no one should ever have to pay them.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    3. Re:Blockbuster lost me when... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      they sent me threatening letters stating they'd take me to court over $20 in late fees.
      I called their bluff and said fine take me to court over $20.
       
      They didn't get that money, and they won't ever be seeing anymore from me. the SMART business move would be to send me a buy one get one free voucher, stating as a sign of good will we are wiping your late fee's and would love to have your business back.

      You want to be _rewarded_ for failing to keep your end of the bargain/contract up? I mean, there is such a thing as poor customer service - but get real.
    4. Re:Blockbuster lost me when... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Riddance

      It's selfish jackasses like you that lead to movies not being available.

  30. Salvation by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If the studios/distributors would just get ((*^&^ing real on the cost of plastic disks, they could save blockbuster, make more money, slow down piracy. Switch from elaborately packaged boxed discs,and "renting", go to a burn on demand kiosk mode for cheap. For the same loot, customer gets "rent" and "bring back" or "take home and keep". Which would most people choose, either going to the store or doing it through the mail? Blockbuster has the locations already, they could SELL burnt on demand disks slipped into cheap paper sleeves with the title for what they charge for renting now. Popular disks-latest releases and strong demand items- they could have a lot already made up sitting on the shelves. Throw in a few duplicators in the back room or the back of the store, a few kiosks for ordering and browsing for what isn't displayed on the shelves. They could up their inventory space tremendously by going to digital tech and storing ten times the amount of movies they have now and use the on demand service. They might make less per "unit", but selling a lot more "units" they would make more net profit.

    1. Re:Salvation by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      Blockbuster and other video shops would make more money that way, but the movie industry doesn't want burn-on-demand, unless the burned disc can only be viewed for a limited time.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
  31. Lovely Contradiction by ilovegeorgebush · · Score: 1

    I love how "Try as it might, the future of Blockbuster is bleak, at best" and "Sure, the company still enjoys revenue that climb into the billions of dollars" are used in the same sentence. I couldn't define contradiction better if I tried.

    I think someone's getting a little carried away. Blockbuster are huge, and they're not just in the US. Calm down and sleep on it.

    1. Re:Lovely Contradiction by wuputah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Revenue is not profit, and if your market is a brick and mortar store, there is a limit to how much you can cut costs - you have to stock the store, pay employees, etc etc. Closing stores means losing that market, but I suppose they could simply close all stores operating at a loss... I wonder how many stores they would have left.

      --
      Brought to you by the numbers π, e, and 0x1B.
  32. Shipping slowdown by tmosley · · Score: 1

    Netflix lost me when they started slowing down my shipping. Instead of getting my movies within the next business day like I was supposed to, it would take 7-10 days, which was ridiculous. With blockbuster, I can just take in my movies for a free rental at the local store and they get a 2-5 day extension. I don't really care how long it takes to get my next movie, as long as I have something to watch whenever I like.

    If they were to up my charges I would most assuredly abandon the whole rental service altogether. This service is for my convenience, and the moment it becomes inconvenient, either because the price is too high or I don't get movies in a timely manner, it will be dropped. There are plenty of other entertainment options out there.

  33. Re:What rock have editors/bloggers been living und by Professor+Mindblow · · Score: 1

    I have to go with the NYTimes over this blogger on this one, from an earlier story posted on SlashDot http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/08/16/1250239. Blockbuster is actually beating Netflix at its own game: "By the first quarter this year, after years of outstripping Blockbuster in subscriber growth, Netflix added 480,000 new subscribers while Blockbuster signed up 780,000 new members. And in the second quarter of this year, Netflix, which prides itself on customer loyalty, lost 55,000 customers. Blockbuster added 525,000, bringing its total to 3.6 million."

  34. We'll be talking about Gamestop's death eventually by RichPowers · · Score: 1

    Blockbuster is just indicative of things to come. Netflix may be riding high now, but as Hollywood slowly embraces digital distribution, its party will eventually end. But for the digital distribution to really take hold, several issues must first be resolved: DRM, broadband access, widely-used media centers, digital distribution services, etc. Of these, broadband availability and speed is the biggest obstacle, especially in the U.S.

    The seeds are planted; now they must converge to the point of making physical copies of DVDs and games obsolete. And with oil rapidly approaching $100/barrel, all commodities, even small things like a DVDs and videogames, become more expensive to produce and deliver to consumers. Digital distribution is better insulated from rising commodity prices.

    I just don't see the public embracing endless format and retailer wars. Cut out the HD-DVDs, Blu-Rays, Blockbusters, and Netflixes; just download the damn things straight to my future 5TB harddrive :)

    This entire process might take take 10, maybe 15, years, but I wouldn't bet the future on companies like Gamestop, with their high fixed operating costs. Why not cut out them out and sell directly to the consumer, as Steam does? Wii, 360, and PS3 all have online stores that will only expand over the coming years. Hell, Gamestop has practically eliminated its PC game section and makes a lot of its money on used videogame sales. Of course when physical copies of videogames stop being manufactured, it'll be pretty hard to sell used versions, won't it? And it doesn't help that Gamestop, like Blockbuster, pisses off legions of would-be customers through its terrible customer service.

  35. What is the impetus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to jump off?

  36. Bye-bye Blockbuster by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    "Barack Obama"

    And he's right...

    Blockbuster would actually be better off re-discovering itself. In fact, it might do better to sell off it's online service to Netflix and do a partnership where Netflix members could swap their discs. And buy themselves a bit more time.

    But I've said for a while brick and mortar DVD rentals is dying. In fact, Netflix's model only has another 5-15 yrs before it goes the same. But Netflix is actively engaged in developing the means for TV on demand in order to keep it's future open.

    ***

    Regarding all of the hoopla over Blockbuster's "Total Access". I once received a $10 giftcard to Blockbuster. So I decided to go rent a couple of movies. Except I had already either seen everything I wanted in the new release section via Netflix or it was out. After over 2 hours in the store I was down to renting "Muppets Wizard of Oz".

    In the end I simply bought a used copy of an already seen movie "I, Robot". And that evening I did not get to watch a movie. I had wasting my entire time simply trying to find a movie to watch. I could have gone home and watched my Netflix films.

    That one incident proved to me that Blockbuster's "Total Access" was useless to me. Shortly there after Netflix announced the download on demand. Now, when I am out of movies or in a different mood I simply go there. Most availabile films/shows are kind of "B" status. But I can usually find something entertaining to watch in the immediacy.

    ***

    Someone mentioned Red Box. This is really what Blockbuster should do. It's the future of brick'n'mortar rental. In fact, I think Netflix should hook up with Red Box. (Since they're both red.)

  37. Ignore the "Barack Obama" line by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Sorry, it was a copy/paste error. I began this post as a response to the blog comments (the guy asking who the next VP in 2008) was going to be.

    Forgot to remove it...

    "Ron Paul" would be better than Obama though.

  38. Blockbuster did it to themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blockbuster ordered a large amount of product from a company my friend worked at. My friend worked in the accounting department.

    My friends employer is large enough to take care of itself. They have no debt. They deliver their product to companies all over the world. They are very respected and always pay their bills.

    When Blockbuster's order came through, my friends company seemed glad to have a new account. They are both Texas companies, only 60 miles apart, and it seemed a natural fit. But after the first order was filled, Blockbuster did not pay on time. They dragged their feet. The CEO finally had to get tough with Blockbuster before they were paid their due. They never, ever, did business again with Blockbuster -- even though Blockbuster wanted to do business with them.

    Blockbuster has had poor business practices for a long time. They were ripe for credible competition. Netflix just tipped the scales. And judging by Netflix's service and speed, are much better at what they do than Blockbuster.

  39. Can't be botherd by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 1

    I have never used Blockbuster because they require a credit card. I can use a debt card anywhere else but there. Add in lack of an adult section and the amount of floor space dedicated to non-movies (games mostly) and they just don't offer enough non-major releases that would get me to spend money there.

  40. yeah right by urban_warrior · · Score: 1

    blockbuster may be slowing down but its not going anywhere soon, you see there are many people who don't want to have to wait for a movie in the mail, they decide quite often on the spur of the moment hey lets rent a movie tonight, while renting a movie over the net may be convenient there are definitely some latency issues. I would just write this article off as over-hype.

  41. newsgroups by legoman666 · · Score: 1

    The day I give money to Netflix or Blockbuster is the day my newsgroups access disappears. I pay $30/mo for giganews. With my uni connection, I can get a movie in 5 minutes. It usually takes me longer than that to actually find a movie I want to watch. It really doesn't get more convenient than that. Hell, with the uni connection speed, I can actually stream an HD-DVD or Blu-ray in real time.

    1. Re:newsgroups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works for new releases and new TV but not for hard to find or older films.

    2. Re:newsgroups by WithLove · · Score: 1

      But see, Blockbuster and Netflix have to worry about winning over the Average User.... They already know they've lost you.

  42. What Blockbuster Has Over Netflix by _bug_ · · Score: 1

    what is the impetus for us to jump on the Blockbuster bandwagon?

    unless BB undercuts the Netflix price scheme one way or the other, the only advantage they have is the physical store. the stores allow for impulse renting. no wait time. for those times when a rainy day cancels evening plans or someone mentions a movie you've got to see asap you've got a physical store to rent the movie you need right then and there.

    a small group at best.

    netflix has it locked.

    1. Re:What Blockbuster Has Over Netflix by adrianmonk · · Score: 1

      unless BB undercuts the Netflix price scheme one way or the other, the only advantage they have is the physical store.

      For comparable plans, Netflix and Blockbuster have the exact same prices. Both have a 3-out-at-a-time plan for $16.99, a 2-out-at-a-time plan for $13.99, a 1-out-at-a-time plan for $9.99, and a 2-movies-per-month plan for $4.99.

      Given that, it's down to the small ways that they find to differentiate themselves. Netflix has streaming movies, although others have said the selection there is not good. Blockbuster has the option of renting in-store, and though their Netflix-comparable plans include no free in-store rentals, they discount rentals to $1.99 when you return a DVD with those plans. So they each have one perk which has marginal usefulness for most people.

      Basically, as far as I can tell, neither is obviously better than the other. They are very closely matched.

  43. The one thing they do right by wuputah · · Score: 1

    The one thing I use Blockbuster for is if I want a movie *now.* While this is exceedingly rare in my case, this is a role that, right now, only a brick and mortar store can provide. Once sufficient bandwidth is ubiquitous and a good download service is out there, this market, too, will die.

    --
    Brought to you by the numbers π, e, and 0x1B.
    1. Re:The one thing they do right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's called bittorrent. I can get any popular new release dvd in 30 minutes. it takes longer to drive to the store.

    2. Re:The one thing they do right by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      it's called bittorrent. I can get any popular new release dvd in 30 minutes. it takes longer to drive to the store.

      Key words..'popular new release'. For any non mainstream thing, it might take days or weeks to d/l. Netflix is at most 3 days (assuming they have it).

    3. Re:The one thing they do right by wuputah · · Score: 1

      The last thing I rented was The Queen (2006). Any attempt to torrent a 1.5-year old film would have taken a very long time.

      --
      Brought to you by the numbers π, e, and 0x1B.
  44. Re:Don't they have a similar service now by rjhubs · · Score: 1

    I find this story hard to believe, because Blockbuster has been doing well and taking over the online market from Netflix because of the simple advantage of also having brick and mortar stores to exchance your movies at, plus the added coupons you get sent every month. Not to mention, blockbuster will have the larger selection. For those not familiar with the rental industry, the movies blockbuster doesn't manage to sell secondhand after their rental life, just sit in a warehouse waiting for action. I would find it extremely hard to believe that Netflix has a larger selection than someone that has been in the buisness for a long time. Plus Hollywood Video/Movie Gallery are pretty much closing down, leaving Blockbuster the dominate force with brick and mortar, which will not be going away for at least 10 years.

  45. Blockbuster lost me when... by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... they sent me threatening letters stating they'd take me to court over $20 in late fees.

    I called their bluff and said fine take me to court over $20.

    They didn't get that money, and they won't ever be seeing anymore from me. the SMART business move would be to send me a buy one get one free voucher, stating as a sign of good will we are wiping your late fee's and would love to have your business back. THAT would have probably seen me giving them repeat business. Now they get nothing.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
  46. This is not that hard by wuputah · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here is an example timeline of the "No late fees" feature:

    * You rent a movie January 1.
    * It is due January 8th.
    * If you don't return it by January 15th, they assume you are keeping it forever. You get charged the price of the movie.
    * If you return it before February 15th, the price of the movie is refunded and you are charged a $1.95 restocking fee.

    They make this completely clear when their automated system calls you about your movie being overdue.

    I still don't think this lives up to "no late fees," but as they used to charge $4/night for late fees, it could be a lot worse.

    (PS. Where is the textile markup option for Slashdot?)

    --
    Brought to you by the numbers π, e, and 0x1B.
    1. Re:This is not that hard by RobFlynn · · Score: 1

      I got hit with the 'no late fee' thing a few years ago. I haven't been back. I rented a movie and returned it a DAY late. They misplaced the movie. A week or so later, they called me, telling me that the movie was late. I told them that I had already returned it. They told me they'd correct the issue. A month or so later, I received a letter from their collections department threatening me because I didn't pay the price of the movie. (They had my card on file, why didn't they just charge that?).

      Anyway, I had to go through hell to prove to them that I didn't HAVE the movie, that I DID return it, and I didn't return it late.

      It took a month or so, but I got them to refund my money and apologize. I promptly canceled my service with them and have been with Netflix ever since.

      --

      ---
      Rob Flynn
      Pidgin
    2. Re:This is not that hard by wuputah · · Score: 1

      Well, this is the fault of one or more likely-teenaged employees. When you return anything, there is a chance that they will say they never got it—it doesn't matter whether you returned it late or not. Basically, I have to summarize your experience as unlucky. Granted, Blockbuster might do this twice as often as some other vendor--not saying they're great or anything.

      --
      Brought to you by the numbers π, e, and 0x1B.
  47. why netflix by Dare+nMc · · Score: 3, Informative

    I go to the local grocery store and up to their DVD kiosk and rent a movie for 24 hours at 1.05

    definitely live in a different area than me. Kiosk at my safeway has under 30 movies, and most are around $3-4. pre netflix I watched 3-4 a month, and had watched every movie I was interested in (that was available) a few years back.

    Netflix has a great site, I have rented 300 movies in the last 2 years, and I have 50 movies in my queue. The site has no problem finding new (to me) movies. No more wondering rental stores, or hanging out at a kiosk daily. monthly I visit netflix.com, and imdb.com in seperate tabs, 1 hour max to top off a new list of movies for us. To do anything equivalent at a remote site would require printing the results of the same browsing, and printing the queue, and then hunting for which of them are their.
    1. Re:why netflix by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      definitely live in a different area than me. Kiosk at my safeway has under 30 movies, and most are around $3-4. pre netflix I watched 3-4 a month, and had watched every movie I was interested in (that was available) a few years back. Wow, I wouldn't even bother at that price point. At Publix supermarkets in Florida, they have the 1.05 kiosks the OP is talking about. I don't know how many movies are in there, maybe a hundred or more? It's a large box and the DVD cases don't take up much room. It's fast and it works. You're not going to get old movies, naturally, just the new releases, but they seem to have more than enough in there. This is unlike Blockbuster where there's walls devoted to a given movie but they may still be sold out.

      I'm sure Netflix will get their encoding problems sorted out. The movies on the 360 look decent enough. Electronic distribution is going to be the future, at least for movies you don't feel compelled to see more than once.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  48. Bleak at best? by mr_nuff · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or did the write-up read a whole lot like a "Netcraft confirms it.." post?

  49. Netflix best value by far by pacalis · · Score: 1

    Are you sure you're talking about the NFLX? I always get my top choice. I schedule new releases. And I have a two business day turn around on movies from when I send them. On value. Netflix sells the long tail. Think of their "Watch Now" as a whole blockbuster store without the new release section. Lots of crap, but it was added as a free service. Add to that the giant DVD selection, the recommender system, the queue, no late fees and you're looking at a huge value. Finally, I would bet that NFLX is cheaper per viewing minute than a kiosk. Ballpark, assuming you keep each DVD for 5 days (5 replacements/month ) On a $16 plan you get 16 hours of watch now, + (3 DVDs x 2hr x 5 replacements) (week per dvd) ~ $0.35 per viewing hour vs. kiosk $0.66-$1.33 (incl. late fees) per viewing hour.

  50. Netflix over blockbuster for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    About a year ago we decided to give the online rental thing a try. I signed us up for Blockbuster and Netflix because they both offered a free month to try the service. Twice the movies and I knew I'd be cancelling one, so that was nice.

    Anyway, Blockbuster had the edge in the "return to the local store" policy, but of the dozen or so movies we put in our queue, about half were unavailable through Blockbuster. All were available through Netflix. So I decided we would, for the time being, stick with Netflix.

    When I cancelled the Blockbuster account, they requested that I explain why I was cancelling. That's fine with me, because if Blockbuster improved their availability, I figured I could switch over. I spent some time putting together a good explanation of why I chose not to do Blockbuster and what they could do to get me to give them another chance. I figured if anyone read those things, they'd appreciate some good feedback.

    Well, I hit sumbit, and got a lovely error message: "Please limit your comments to 255 characters."

    That did it. I had spent time trying to help Blockbuster understand what they could do to get me as a customer, and I run into a (heretofore unmentioned) limit in how much text I could send. The limit itself was stupid enough (really? 255 bytes is all you're going to spare?) but after I wasted my time writing something for their benefit I decided they could rot in hell.

    Netflix has been just fine for me and they've lowered the price a couple times. I wouldn't have gone to Blockbuster regardless, but the price cut is nice anyhow.

    1. Re:Netflix over blockbuster for me by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      That whole "taking time, trying to HELP them, only to find that it was a wasted effort" thing would piss me off too.

      Guess they should have used TEXT instead of VARCHAR(255). :)

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
  51. $5 or $10 per month is astronomical? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For $5 per month I get 10 hours of video. For $10 this goes up to unlimited (well, maybe 30 hours if you make assumptions about mailing time which for me is 1 day).

    The worst part is the "instant viewing" selection on NetFlix is slim, but it is convenient. And, with the S-video port on the laptop easy to use on the TV. Especially if you already have a video switch for cable, DVD, VHS, & console (you probably have at least 2 of those).
    The physical DVD selection is fine. I wish it was better, but then again I wish they put more things out on DVD to begin with (Hill St. Blues seasons >2, St Elsewhere >1, many many classic movies)

    I find the $50-$125 monthly cable bill (which I no longer have) to be astronomical. So you are OK paying $50-125 for commercial riven crap but $10 for DVDs is too much?

  52. Those who are Investors by jameseyjamesey · · Score: 1

    Those who are investors will know that Netflix lost 270,000 customers in the 3rd quarter of 2007. That's not good, and it's definitely too early to tell who's winning the battle.

  53. The way I see it by jhylkema · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Every time I go into Blockbuster, all I see are a couple hundred copies of the latest straight-to-video abortion. No wonder they're going bankrupt.

  54. Re:Don't they have a similar service now by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Blockbuster would've had to buy the movies in order to have them sit unsold in a warehouse somewhere. Although I'm sure their back log contains numerous movies, I would find it hard to believe they had been in the habit of purchasing anything outside of their rather homogeneous standard selection until they were forced to compete with Netflix.

    Netflix and Blockbuster, both, are in a fight for their lives, but it is Blockbuster that has arrived late to the game Netflix is playing. Their Plywood & Drywall stores are at the same time their greatest asset and their greatest liability.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  55. Re:Total Access kicks Netflix's butt (you wish) by JKVM · · Score: 1

    Ridiculous. I tried using Blockbuster's TotalAccess on three different occasions, each time hoping they had addressed the issues I'd had in the past. I never ended up paying for the service and I continue to receive the "Free Trail" passes for TotalAccess.

    Their website is AWFUL, I mean really bad. You type in Mel Gibson, it's too DUMB to realize that is an actor, not a movie, and tries its best to come up with a movie name. It also can't handle typos. The last time I tried it, a few months ago, it consistently crashed Firefox. It's also very ugly, slow, and flash intensive. Their rating system sucks, and does not do any of the complex analysis that Netflix does to give you a rating tailored to you, not a global average. Did you ever try contacting Netflix customer care when you were having those issues?

    I hate Blockbuster and love Netflix. I hope Blockbuster dies a slow and painful death.

  56. That's fine for you, but ... by switcha · · Score: 1
    Because

    I'd rather put my money there [kiosk] and have slim pickings than go to Blockbuster [Netflix, etc].

    isn't a universal opinion.
    --
    You know what? ... A little club soda *did* get that out!
  57. Neither is good enough by Compuser · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whoever is the first to have a foreign film section which is
    a. In native language
    b. As complete as Hollywood section
    will get my dollars. There is cinema everywhere - Korea, China, Brazil,
    Russia - everywhere; but try finding these movies at Netflix. There will
    be a few but for instance some of my favorite 1970's French movies are
    not there. Many good movies are indies or equivalent - short run, never
    been in wide release type. Again, hard to find. Some movies were dubbed
    into other languages. Are these dubbed versions avaliable along with originals?
    No.
    I speak Russian. Can I find Eisenstein movies on netflix? In Russian?
    These guys do not want my dollars so they don't get them.

    1. Re:Neither is good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's because you come from a sub culture of weirdo movie snobs. trust me i doubt they want your business.

    2. Re:Neither is good enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      If the foreign movies you talk about were available in Region 1 DVDs, meaning they would play on DVD players in the US, then Netflix would have them. But many foreign movies, French movies especially, have never been released in the US and haven't even been subtitled so they could be released. Don't blame Netflix. Unless you have a region-free DVD player most foreign DVDs won't be playable here and it would be a nightmare for Netflix to carry them and then try to explain to people why they wouldn't play.

      Instead, get eMule and a good net connection and you will have access to a whole new world of foreign movies. Even more than Netflix (which I subscribe to) the ability to get rare and foreign movies via p2p is one of the wonders of the Internet age.

    3. Re:Neither is good enough by Compuser · · Score: 1

      I am sure there something like Netflix in France.
      All they'd have to do is redirect me to those servers
      for downloading the movie I want.
      I have not tried p2p but I doubt it is well-organized,
      annotated, and has informative user reviews. I want a
      polished service and nothing less will do. I am just
      fine not watching movies except in theaters. But if
      I could get what I wanted just when I wanted in the
      format I wanted then I'd pay a subscription fee for
      those rare "spur of the moment" downloads.

    4. Re:Neither is good enough by colfer · · Score: 1

      Of course they have Eisenstein, subtitled. That's not too bad. Movies are never dubbed for the US market. (Except early Clint Eastwood ?? and the first Mad Max! Mel Gibson's Aussie accent was too tough.)

    5. Re:Neither is good enough by porcupine8 · · Score: 1

      Right now, Netflix only ships to the US and US territories. I seriously doubt that they have a branch in France; if they do, their US website has no mention of it anywhere. I think it's rather unfair of you to expect them to go so far as to hook you up with a different company (if such even exists) in a different country to get things that simply have not been released in the US at all. Also, if there is a French equivalent, why would they want to send you a movie when you're paying Netflix, not them? Why don't you go find France's Netflix equivalent yourself and ask them to ship to you in the US?

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
    6. Re:Neither is good enough by Compuser · · Score: 1

      This would not be without precedent. Peering agreements
      are a part of the internet after all. Even airlines make
      worldwide alliances. There is no reason this would not
      work for movie downloads.
      And yes, I agree, if they had to ship movies by mail it
      would be unreasonable. But Netflix has a download service
      so, again, all they'd have to do is give me access to
      a peer download service in the country of my choice. They
      could even charge more for this premium service and give
      some of that premium to the peering company in that other
      country. All I want is for that complexity to be hidden
      from me. I want an all-in-one shop where I can find
      everything that has ever been shot and digitized. For a
      price, yes, of course. I also want an active effort to
      digitize rare and old footage, just like Google books.

    7. Re:Neither is good enough by porcupine8 · · Score: 1
      I also want an active effort to digitize rare and old footage, just like Google books.

      I agree that this would be a good thing to have. I am guessing that worldwide copyright stuff is one major block to getting both this, and the everything-in-the-world-all-in-one deal that you're looking for.

      --
      Warning: Apple/Nintendo fangirl. Likes her electronics cute & cuddly. May be rabid.
  58. survive digital distribution? by racecarj · · Score: 1

    i'm surprised they survived DVD, not too mention the internet-DIVX-etc.

    forget about how often you rent something yourself, how often do you see rental boxes in the wild? 10 years ago they were everywhere. today i might as well just buy the disc for $5. good riddance anyway

  59. Total Access is a total rip-off.. by nixkuroi · · Score: 1

    Anyone who goes into the store to trade in movies is going to quickly learn that the movies you get from the store come with the renewed burden of LATE FEES.

    Yes. That's right. You started renting movies online because of the wonderful no-late-fee world of video rental and when you finally go back because they make it easy to return and get new movies, you find out it's just an excuse to trick you into new late fees.

    The funny thing I experienced was, the guys in the store didn't even TELL me there were late fees until I'd completed my instore sign-up and I'd left the store, then went back to ask them if I could rent more than three movies. They told me no so I told them that I'd see it in a month or two and then - only then - did they tell me that the movies had to be back in a week or there'd be fees. I was like - what??? I quit renting from here because of that very thing. They said that it was a program to get people back into the stores, which translated for me to "get people back into the late fees".

    Forget Total Access. Blockbuster online isn't bad, but with Netflix and the ability to download movies from the internet, I don't see a pleasant future for them.

  60. "No late fees" and no movies either... by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 1

    I was probably one of the few people that enthusiastically supported Blockbuster's "no late fee" policy. "You can keep a movie for a month and only pay $1.25 restocking fee? Awesome!" And it was awesome, especially for video games, until about a month after they instituted the change and it was damn near impossible to find any new release movie or game. I stopped going to BB after my fourth or fifth attempt to rent the same new release and just hit Rogers Video, a well known Canadian chain, and found the movie right away.

    As for the no late fee policy, I honestly think it is killing their business. Their main competitor here in Canada, Rogers Video, has a similar no late fee policy but will charge you for the movie after eight days rather than thirty, so people hustle back the movies fairly quickly and thus Rogers is rarely out of movies. Rogers is really the only competition Blockbuster has in Canada, or at least, here in Alberta. If Blockbuster goes broke Rogers would have the video rental market in Canada pretty much locked up, and lack of competition is never a good thing for the consumer.

  61. Re:Don't they have a similar service now by xtr3mist · · Score: 1

    I use Netflix currently. I want to switch to Blockbuster for one option.. the ability to drop off viewed movies.. when using Netflix I watch tv shows.. the entire season.. it did suck to get episode 2 and 3 before 1.. but that is not my beef.. returns via the mail system suck.. it takes days for them to get it.. then it takes a day to list it as acquired by them.. then it takes a day to ship the next one.. and that one does not usually leave the day it claims.. the next day for most of them.. for the price I still get alot of shows.. but trying to maximize the rentals using the mail service is not a good idea. As long as Blockbuster offers the ability to drop off viewed movies it takes alot of time off the turn around.

  62. Local connectivity really isn't even the main prob by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Meanwhile, the only thing saving Netflix's ass is the anticompetitive nature of the telecom industry in the US, which causes us to have broadband slow enough to make downloading DVD-quality movies too painful...

    That wouldn't matter with a strong BitTorrent like distribution network. The speeds we have today from cable interest are fast enough for streaming 720p Divx video in almost real time.

    Until commercial interests embrace network efficient distribution, there will always be enough bottlenecks somewhere to keep online video from being the roaring success it might be otherwise. Even Akami is not enough, not close enough to the user or helpful enough for a given ISP link.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  63. I prefer Bllockbuster to Netflix by beavmetal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1st.) The highest level tier for both services is basically the same price, However
    2nd.) The blockbuster 500 yards from my apartment, will let me exchange my mail order movies for free ones
    3rd.) as a result the best value for my dollar come from blockbuster.

    Assuming I can get 3 new movies every 4 days via mail from either service I get 21 (rounding down) movies a month. However, with blockbuster, I get 21 more from the store. 42 movies block buster (approx $0.595 per movie), 21 movies netflix ($1.19/movie).

    It's obvious which service will quickly fill up your disk drive while giving you an excellent value.

    --
    Looks like it is time to replace your Personality Module. You are a bit to clingy, guess I better replace your fuser to
  64. I've got to agree.. by msimm · · Score: 1

    the gee-wiz factor with the Netflix service left me luke-warm. I'll give them credit for shifting the paradigm, but sometimes you just want to browse movies and pick up something THEN, you know, when you're in the mood for it. The in-store exchange kind of gives you the best of both worlds and I've had nothing but good luck with the queue/delivery. And I don't think *either* have my best interests at heart. Just one that works better for me until digital downloads are a reality (sans goofy protection).

    --
    Quack, quack.
  65. Re:We'll be talking about Gamestop's death eventua by Xuranova · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I like to think there are enough people out there like myself who detest steam. Why do I need to be connected to the internet to play a single player game? Why am I going to pay full price to dl a game? If I'm paying full price I want a disc, manual(preferably color) and some fancy box art.

    Do we need Gamestop? Nah. But I'm not paying for digital only distribution. Give me my pretty box and disc please :)

    --
    "There is no real right or wrong, just what the majority accepts at the time."
  66. Re:What rock have editors/bloggers been living und by zeroduck · · Score: 1

    Blockbuster could make a huge comeback. I really believe it.

    I think their total access program is awesome. I have tried all the services (Netflix, Blockbuster, Walmart). Netflix just delivered the best service. I move every 3 months for my schooling and internship program (Kettering University, formerly GMI, which goes on a 3 month school/3 month internship schedule). The best service, as it comes to delivering movies is certainly Netflix.

    I haven't been subscribed for a few terms, but decided that I'd go back to Netflix this term. So , they've delivered the #1 pick on my queue everytime. I guess if you have some weird stuff it might not come in a timely manor, but it hasn't affected me. Even the indie movies I watch come on time.

    I don't really know why I chose Netflix over Blockbuster. Being able to pick up a movie in store is really a good feature, but the better interface and recomendation system won.

    I made the choice while intoxicated, I am typing it intoxicated as well. Maybe that explains the lack of objective judgement.

    Netflix's internet streaming would be 100% cooler if it wasn't tied to Windows. I am running Ubuntu on my laptop... if I could play it here..... Netflix would be god.

  67. F* Blockbuster! by Huntr · · Score: 1

    My wife and I opened a new account at the Blockbuster where we had just moved. We rented a movie a few times and returned them on time. Once, we returned the movie late, dropped it in the slot after closing time on the day it was due. Ok, no problem, I knew I'd have to pay the $2.95 late fee when we rented the next time.

    Well, 2 weeks went by and we didn't rent a movie (oh noes). At the end of the 2nd week, I got a letter in the mail from Blockbuster informing me of the late fee on my account and asking me to come in and pay the $2.95, threatening me with a collection agency. So, I did. And I haven't given Blockbuster a fucking dime since.

    That was in 1997. Yes, I hold a grudge.

    But, screw them. Don't threaten me for $2.95 late fee that I've only owed for 2 weeks and was going to pay anyway. I hope that company dies and I don't really care how it happens.

    1. Re:F* Blockbuster! by RobFlynn · · Score: 1

      I posted about this a few posts up, but I thought I'd reply to you as well.

      The same thing happened to me, only, they lost the movie I returned and charged me for it. Sent collections after me, etc. After I argued with them for some time, they "found it" and refunded my money.

      I loathe them.

      --

      ---
      Rob Flynn
      Pidgin
  68. lost my business, too by david+in+brasil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Their hidebound corporate culture prevents the use of common sense. Several years ago, my wife rented a movie from Blockbuster that she promptly lost. Three months later, she found it again, and we returned it. By that time, our fees had run up to nearly $100. Blockbuster wouldn't allow us to rent again until we paid the fee. So we just switched to a local movie rental store. Two or three years later, I found myself again inside Blockbuster, but again, I couldn't rent a movie without paying the years-old fee. No amount of discussion or logic would sway the manager - that we had made a mistake, we had returned the movie, we had been using a competitor's services ever since, that they could decide to have our future business or send us back to the competitor forevermore, but either way, we weren't going to pay the $100 fee. The manager said that he couldn't/wouldn't dismiss the fee and that we couldn't rent from Blockbuster without paying for it, etc. At that time, Netflix was just gathering momentum. But on that day, I knew that Blockbuster was destined for a death spiral. They could have had our continued business if they had just been willing to let logic prevail and set aside a hidebound corporate policy, but they preferred not to. Even a few yeas later, when they announced their "no late fees" policy, they wouldn't make it retroactive. I wonder how many other stupid policy decisions turned away customers that they so dearly need now.

    1. Re:lost my business, too by Wolfrider · · Score: 1

      --Look for $somebody (possibly even NF) to BUY OUT BB when the time is ripe. ;-)

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  69. Netflix vs Blockbuster by jedaustin · · Score: 1

    I was a Blockbuster customer for about 5 years.
    Blockbuster's problem in my opinion is that they aren't trustworthy. It started with the rentals due back at noon regardless of when I rented them. If I rent a DVD at 11pm it should be due back by 11pm not NOON! If I return a DVD at 1pm and someone else rents it that day I shouldn't have to pay a damn late fee. In several cases their lazy clerks didn't scan them back in and I had to argue with them to get the late fees taken off. They eventually ended the late fee BS when they were sued. In my opinion If I sign up for something for a certain price that is automatically deducted from my checking account they shouldn't be changing the price without my authorization less than a year later; they did it THREE times with three different deals.

    When they came out with the rewards program where you'd get credit for rentals that would give you free movie rentals I thought it was great... until they jacked up the price without my approval; I cancelled it immediately.

    Next they had the unlimited DVD rental for a fixed price.. it was great.. No late fees!... until they jacked up price without my approval; I cancelled it immediately.

    The next year they launched Blockbuster online... this time I resisted joining right away since I didn't trust them to hold their end of the deal... but I eventually signed up when the lure of renting more movies became unresistable. It was great and being able to return movies to Blockbuster and exchange them for movies in the store was fantastic. Then less than a year later I heard through the grapevine that they would be raising the price and sent their customer service an email letting them know that if they raised the price of my service they'd lose me as a customer forever. A month or so later they raised the price without my authorization AGAIN... I cancelled the service immediately ... AND JOINED NETFLIX!

    I haven't set foot in the Blockbuster store since and WON'T EVER AGAIN.
    They lost my trust and my $$ forever. I hope they go out of business :)

  70. Netflix's Watch Instantly feature by xanadistic · · Score: 1

    I recently watched the entire third season of The Office on Netflix with the Watch Instantly option. The video was crystal clear on my computer, and the sound was great, too. I have also used Watch Instantly to watch two movies on Netflix. Netflix seems to have a better selection than Blockbuster, too, so I don't mind if Netflix continues to grow, while Blockbuster loses ground. I have a broadband connection with Time Warner's cable modem so I don't have any connection problems when using the Watch Instantly feature. Later, Mark

  71. Lack of Movie Availability is a Factor by HugoMossner · · Score: 1

    When I can get movies on my PC 'instantly' or have them mailed within 2 to 3 days, why waste time with blockbuster (lackluster)? I went to a local blockbuster, that is about a 15 min walk, when I was looking for the movie 'Premonition', and it was completely out. This was about 3 days after the initial release. I went back 5 times over about a week and a half before it was in stock. They used to have a deal where if it was not on the shelf, they would give you a free rental, but they don't have the progame at the one near me anymore. I finally got smart and decided to take my business elsewhere. blockbuster - if you are reading this, consider it the 'writing on the wall'.

  72. On-Demand? by vlad_grigorescu · · Score: 1

    It seems a bit unfair to blame all of this on Netflix. What about Digital Cable's On-Demand? It seems a lot more convenient to order and watch a movie from your couch, for a similar price as Blockbuster offers.

  73. Or could it be because Blockbuster DROVE us away? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On January 17, 1994, I rented a couple of films from Blockbuster in Louisville - due back the following Tuesday. That night, Louisville was hit by one of the worst winter storms that I have ever seen - it nearly shut the city down for an entire week.

    Despite that, we got the van dug out of the snow, made the trip out to Blockbuster, dropped the tapes through the slot in th door ON TIME (despite the fact that the store was closed), ate lunch at the local Applebee's, and went home.

    Two months later, I get a notice in the mail that I never turned in the tapes, and that I owe Blockbuster $$$. It took three phone calls and a lot of attitude from the store staff before they finally bothered to look on their own shelves, and admitted that the tapes in question were "found on shelf". Then the store manager tried to hit me with, "but they were not turned in on time, so you owe us a late fee"

    Final straw for me. EXCUSE ME?!? That was day of the huge snow! YOUR STORE was CLOSED for days after that took place. The tapes were THERE when you finally opened the place up, and you just admitted that your staff could not be bothered to scan the entire stack that was sitting there ... you just put them on the SHELVES! So then you accuse me of not turning the tape in, and now you want LATE FEES?!?

    That is paraphrased - 13 years is an awfully long time.

    But I haven't been in the store since.

  74. Blockbuster is killing Blockbuster by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    Blockbuster screwed me out of $20 by messing up a movie return. They said I never returned it, then found it, but charged $20 to my credit card for a late fee. Talking to the manager did nothing to remove the charge and with their high prices and even higher late fees I swore I would never set foot in one again. That was 10 years ago. Glad to see their demise continue.

    1. Re:Blockbuster is killing Blockbuster by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If Blockbuster was a good store, people would go there because they *enjoy* going there. If you're having an unpleasant experience, you'll look for other ways to rent movies. Or other more pleasurable pastimes.

      They got into the corporate mindset of "How can we wring every possible penny from our customers"? The customers feel that attitude.

      I also stopped subscribing to Netflix once they started throttling my account. Bad move guys. I was almost done with my list and would have subscribed forever, renting a movie every month or so. Now I just laugh as you send me "Come back to us!" deals in the mail without addressing the point of why I left.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  75. Rental replacement cost by CustomDesigned · · Score: 2, Informative

    Media companies charge more for rental copies - usually over $100. So $135 for replacement cost was very likely accurate (although perhaps they should have prorated it since they have to replace worn copies). I don't know if rental copies are specially marked. If not, you could have bought a personal copy and offered it as the replacement.

    1. Re:Rental replacement cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Bullshit. Why do people still believe this? Even back in the VHS days when movies were either "priced for rental" or "priced to own" that was THE price for the movie. There was no separate pricing for rental stores versus individuals. It's not illegal to rent out property you own, so discriminatory pricing can't work. If movie distributors tried pricing them higher for rental stores those stores would just buy them where ever they were sold to individuals and rent out those copies.

      I am a Hollywood Video store manager, so yes, I know what I'm talking about.

  76. Meanwhile... by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

    Blazing fast usenet access and alt.binaries.hdtv movie downloads are killing netflix!

    I used to rent movies all the time... Now? Not so much. It started years ago with DVD rips... Then it progressed to just downloading whole DVD ISO images... Now? Next-gen DVD rips or HDTV rips of stuff in HD.

    The only problem now, is that unlike before, I can't go out and BUY a movie I like enough to keep, because HD-DVD and Blu-Ray players are still stupidly expensive.

    MPAA: That's my real name, bitches. Come and get me, since you seem hell-bent on destroying all movie sales once and for all.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  77. Selection, quality, and convenience by Kludge · · Score: 1

    See the subject line.
    I am willing to bet that your kiosk may have 1 of the dozens of videos that I have rented from Netflix. The selection is wonderful, far greater than Blockbuster. And searching for videos is easy.
    The DVDs are always working and relatively scratch-free (something I can not say of Blockbuster).
    I do not have to go to the store to get the video.
    No late fees.

  78. I quit BlockBuster in favor of local library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I quit BlockBuster in favor of local library. It's free unless I forget to return in time, and the late fees are reasonable. Plus I can request movies from other libraries in the local area. I don't see how BlockBuster or NetFlix can compete with that.

    Now for foreign films, I have to go to the local college library, but it's still free, as long as I remember to return on time.

  79. Change happens by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    Change happens. It's the nature of the universe. People whining that things need to stay the way they are need to grow up. I don't care if you're Santa Clara developers having to compete against Mumbai developers, or Blockbuster having to compete against Netflix. Adapt or die.

    Change happens. When I was a kid there were no video stores, DVD or VHS or Beta. I remember when they came in. Remember when it was a choice between Beta and VHS, and later when Beta users bitched about how unfair change was. I remember when there was a choice between VHS and DVD, and later when VHS users bitched about how unfair change was. And I then there's now when there's a choice between understocked stores with rude clerks and convenient online rental services, and how the bitching is starting.

    Video stores are not that old. I'm not going to cry over their disappearance.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  80. Goodbye Losers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm glad to see BlockBuster die. I hope it's a horrible death, and that its' shareholders lose billions. It's wonderful to see the axe fall on their collective necks just as they caused smaller video businesses to struggle and die. They could have lived in harmony, but instead chose to see everyone else an an enemy. Die BlockBuster, die! Oh, and I don't read responses to the posts I make. I don't return because I don't want to hear from the dumb shits that will inevitably spout-off about my posts thinking that they'll somehow teach me something (like that'll ever happen) or get to vent on me or get me to read their perspective, so suck it up sonny. I said what I wanted to. My perspective/opinion is the only one in the Universe that matters, flaky-boys. Muhahahahaaaaaaaa :P

  81. Death Well Deserved by osobear · · Score: 1

    Blockbuster is also being killed by how incredibly expensive it is!

    I was amazed when I went to Family Video for the first time a few weeks ago. New movies are $2.60 for 5 nights ($4.50 or so at Blockbuster). Older movies and newer TV shows are $1 for 5 nights!
    But the biggest difference is games: $3 for 1 night, $4 for 2 nights, $5 for 5 nights with Family Video, $8 for 5 nights at Blockbuster.
    Ouch.

  82. Good riddance Blockbuster! by ElvisGump · · Score: 0

    I will forever hate Blockbuster with a holy passion for every time I had to pay $4 late fees for being late just a few minutes after the noon return deadline. They were way expensive to begin with, had crappy service, the long lines to check-out, never seeming to have enough copies of the latest movie- need I go on?

    I can change my queue on Netflix and get a new movie the next day and I can get a hell of a lot more movies a month for the $20 that only got me 4 movies the Blockbuster way.

    My only regret hearing of their impending demise is that I don't know where the corporate drones live so I can drive by and taunt them a second time...

  83. Netflix please come to Canada by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    The only real shower in Canada that compares to Netflix is Zip.ca, which is astronomically expensive ($25 / month???) compared to Netflix.

    Canadian postage is not more than US postage, DVDs are not more, so I don't get why they feel justified charging so much more.

  84. Not just "unlucky". by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    It's not just "unlucky".

    Blockbuster has a problem with sloppy employee training. My experience with them is that they are extremely sloppy. Going to Blockbuster means risking being abused.

  85. Blockbuster Vs. Netflix, and Instant Movies. by cwelch · · Score: 1

    I live in a small town (about 6000 people) in rural NE Okla. and have Blockbuster Online. The nearest place for me to go to a BB store for the Total Access is either Grove (50min) or Claremore (40min) to trade. Sending movies in, however, goes to Tulsa and they arrive at BB the next day, and we get movies the day after they ship out. Netflix's closest center is in Dallas I believe, and takes a while. My mother-in-law has Netflix (also in our town) and it sucks. On top of that, the online movies I've seen them have on their site have all been pretty old. I think I'll stick with BB until they go out of business. No need to switch to something that sucks any sooner than necessary!!