Slashdot Mirror


The Dying PC Market

An anonymous reader writes "The PC's role in Japanese homes is diminishing, as its once-awesome monopoly on processing power is encroached by gadgets such as smart phones that act like pocket-size computers, advanced Internet-connected game consoles, digital video recorders with terabytes of memory NEC's annual PC shipments in Japan shrank 6.2 percent to 2.72 million units in 2006, and the trend is continuing into the first quarter of fiscal 2007 with a 14 percent decline from a year earlier. Sony's PC shipments for Japan shrank 10 percent in 2006 from a year earlier. "The household PC market is losing momentum to other electronics like flat-panel TVs and mobile phones," said Masahiro Katayama, research group head at market survey firm IDC. "Consumers aren't impressed anymore with bigger hard drives or faster processors. That's not as exciting as a bigger TV," Katayama said. "And in Japan, kids now grow up using mobile phones, not PCs. The future of PCs isn't bright.""

307 comments

  1. Yeah, well by gcnaddict · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they'll figure out how important PCs are once they want to start designing those video games, cell phones, PDAs, etc.

    None of those could exist without the PC.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Yeah, well by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well you could do the work on a Server, or a Mainframe. Or even have a speciality device for development of products for these devices. They could exist now without the PC just as PC can exist without Mainframes.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:Yeah, well by ztransform · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article wasn't debating whether the PC would exist, but it pointed out that the PC won't have the dominance it has had. Which makes sense really; most people want to play games, and e-mail. Not too many people at home actually make use of spreadsheets, even when preparing tax returns.

      So if we have a dedicated games device at home, and a mobile phone that can browse the web and access e-mail then that's most of the technology the average punter will want/need.

      Of course I expect most slashdot readers to still want their PCs..

    3. Re:Yeah, well by JanneM · · Score: 1

      they'll figure out how important PCs are once they want to start designing those video games, cell phones, PDAs, etc.

      The article is about the home market, not work. If you'd read it, they specifically point out that Japanese don't bring work home and thus don't have that reason to have a PC around. Separately, the article states that the upgrade cycle for companies has lengthened, as there is little need to replace working machines when the newer models do not offer anything needed.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    4. Re:Yeah, well by calebt3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course I expect most slashdot readers to still want their PCs.. Correction: we want our Linux-running Beowulf clusters.
    5. Re:Yeah, well by Nossie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      isnt a smartphone not just a small pc with a radio stack?

      Personal computers will always exist and if this article proves anything it proves that PCs are consuming other markets than just surfing the net or downloading porn. Just because they are expanding into other markets that were analogue doesn't mean they are going to disappear.

      A TV with a user interface is pretty much a PC.

    6. Re:Yeah, well by tacocat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In part I agree, but I think there's another facet of the issue that they are overlooking.

      The PC market is effectively saturated.

      The need to upgrade your PC every 2 years to keep up with the software is passed. The only exception today is Vista and it's poorer than expected market penetration to date bears witness to the fact that people don't see the features available in Vista as merit for a new machine. We've reached a phase of good enough where computers can easily last 4-5 years in the technology curve without being painfully obsolete.

      During the 1990's by the time the new computer you ordered was shipped to your house it was already being superceded by a newer model. And the software was moving almost as fast. Quickly what ran Windows 3.11 and Windows 95 couldn't hack Office 97 or Windows 98. It definitely couldn't manage Windows NT 4. The gaming video scene was even worse. Today there really isn't sufficient customer-facing change in the software to merit all the hardware changes.

      Add to this the advent of computer gaming consoles like Playstation, XBox, Wii. When I bought my first computer I spend $3,000 to buy it and another $1,500 in the first 12 months for hardware upgrades in order for me to play the latest computer games. Contrast this with current computer use. Games are on the gamestation and my computers are reaching 5+ years of age and still more than sufficient in terms of performance, drive space (easy to add more) and stability/security. There just isn't a need to get a new computer.

      The even more interesting change is that in the past five years I have spent more money on game stations then computers and in the next five years will continue this trend, augemented by new TV, DVD, DVR...

      Computers are still essential. But the consumer spending isn't in that direction any more. There will be few consumers without a computer entirely, but they are more inclined to upgrade their phone then their computer.

    7. Re:Yeah, well by owlnation · · Score: 4, Informative

      isnt a smartphone not just a small pc with a radio stack?
      Yes, but with one very significant difference. You buy your PC, you can even build your own and you have complete control over it. Try doing that with a smart phone -- with even a cheapskate bottom of the range phone.

      While I'd love a small pc that had true notebook capability with me at all times, the last thing I want to do is be further shafted by a phone service provider. And in 20 years of owning cellphones in a variety of countries, I can safely safe that there is not one occasion where I have not, to some degree, been shafted by a phone service provider. I have two university degrees, one in numerate sciences, but I struggle to understand how the numbers on any cellphone contract add up.

      The only way I'm owning a smartphone is if someone else is paying -- or there is a revolution in global regulation that strips the asshole cartel-like phone companies of all their power.

      I'm sure the only significant barrier to smartphone adoption is the criminals that operate the phone companies.
    8. Re:Yeah, well by m2943 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they'll figure out how important PCs are once they want to start designing those video games, cell phones, PDAs, etc.

      "They" don't want to; "they" are home users.

      None of those could exist without the PC.

      Prior to the PC, a lot of that stuff was done on UNIX workstations. And after the PC stops being the darling of home users, it will be done on UNIX workstations again.

      The fact that home computers and professional workstations are the same right now is a temporary state of affairs.

    9. Re:Yeah, well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most people want to play games, and e-mail. Not too many people at home actually make use of spreadsheets, even when preparing tax returns.
      Actually, most adults aren't very interested in games, and most of the people I know (even non-techies) do make use of spreadsheets for all kinds of things. Mobile phones haven't quite got to the stage yet where they're convenient for printing out envelopes for Christmas cards.
    10. Re:Yeah, well by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Mobile phones haven't quite got to the stage yet where they're convenient for printing out envelopes for Christmas cards.

      Have PCs? I don't know a lot of people who do this even if they have the equipment.

    11. Re:Yeah, well by mikael · · Score: 1

      I'd like a laptop with the same level and freedom of connectivity as a mobile phone. While there are mobile phone cards for laptops, they usually come with a minimum of 12-month contracts with tiered data transfer rates. Compare that to a mobile phone which can be pay-as-you-go with a top-up card that can be used at any bank machine.

      Having a pay-as-you-go service for Internet service for laptops would be really useful, especially when working away from home or work.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    12. Re:Yeah, well by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      they'll figure out how important PCs are once they want to start designing those video games, cell phones, PDAs, etc.

      None of those could exist without the PC.


      I think the days of home PCs are numbered. Considering that cell phones and PDAs are now more powerful than "supercomputers" from 30 years ago, I see a dedicated box called a "PC" will dissolve, and instead the functionality will evolved into other devices.

      I have a powerful computer at my house that I rent from my cable TV company. It has something like a 120 GB harddrive, a RISC processor, a clock that automatically changes with DST rules. It records audio and video. Has a GUI that is easy to navigate from my couch with about 10 buttons on a remote control. Anyway, my point is that its a computer, but nobody calls it a computer they call it a digital recorder, a cable box, a PVR or a DVR.

      Video game consoles, cell phones, PDAs are computers, but people don't call those computers.

      I see this trend increasing, where standalone computers will simply be a thing of the past, and their functionality will just be integrated into other things.

      Actually, what is a "computer" anyway? A home PC seems to be some kind of box with video and audio for output to the human, and a keyboard and pointing device for the human to input to the computer. My DVR is not perceived as a "computer" because it does not have a keyboard or pointing device.

      So, once we figure out how to get rid of this archaic technology called a keyboard and a mouse for input from a human into the device, then the computer as we know it is gone.

    13. Re:Yeah, well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    14. Re:Yeah, well by Jezz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ooh, I've just been thinking the EXACT same thing. Considering buying an Apple iPhone (I'm a Mac owner - I do use other computers, mostly Linux - but I do have a Windows Laptop around here somewhere) I did the arithmetic: OUCH! I would have cost me about the same as a nice new iMac.

      Personally I'm thinking about a Nokia phone with an Internet package that allows me to use it "as a broadband modem" [sic] and a Nokia N810 Internet Tablet, essentially because of the "freedom" to futz with the thing. I'm not sure I really want to futz with the phone (really not cool if you mess that up) but I don't want to only have the applications they say I can have. Here in the UK I think this will actually be cheaper than an iPhone (admittedly not that much cheaper).

      Again I actually think there are real advantages to having the "smart" bits of this setup in a separate box (so you can hold the phone to your head AND still read the display on the N810). Of course, this is more nerdish than an iPhone... and perhaps I'll still want santa to bring me an iPod Touch. Of course, the Nokia doesn't look geeky so I can always leave the N810 in my pocket if I don't want to come off as a doofus (I'll need to remember to keep my mouth shut too [grin]) But I also think that an N810 will be more useful for what I do (YMMV).

    15. Re:Yeah, well by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 2, Informative

      Personally, I think the article is about the Japanese market. They live in smaller spaces and don't have the room for a 'workstation' sized computer on it's own desk. Further, I can remember that historically, the Japanese have always had a crippled PC market, going back to the days of the NEC hard drive cartel, when no self-respecting patriotic Japanese would have anything but a large, expensive, unreliable NEC hard drive; it was considered disloyal to have a small reliable inexpensive Seagate. The Japanese have always had fewer and more compromised PCs. Remember, game consoles also are more popular in Japan than PC Gaming.

    16. Re:Yeah, well by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have two university degrees, one in numerate sciences, but I struggle to understand how the numbers on any cellphone contract add up.

      Your problem is that you have the wrong degrees. If you had an MBA, it would all make sense. Especially if you used Excel.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    17. Re:Yeah, well by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Applications like MS-DOS were developed on the PDP-10. I wouldn't classify them as 'Unix' workstations, though. You could cripple them by running Unix on them if you wanted... but Vendor OSes like VMS were the norm.

      Those used to be called Minicomputers. Not Workstations.

    18. Re:Yeah, well by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      So, once we figure out how to get rid of this archaic technology called a keyboard and a mouse for input from a human into the device, then the computer as we know it is gone.

      You'd better hope there's a Jtag connector somewhere on your 'new improved' computer so that once in awhile, when needed, a grown-up can connect a real computer with keyboard and display to it. Otherwise, you'll have to settle for the software written by mysterious and somewhat malevolent elves off somewhere in a mystical place.

    19. Re:Yeah, well by Jezz · · Score: 1

      Oh I'd love to think this was true - but I just can't.

      I think much of the Unix Workstation market (not all) as been subsumed as PCs became more capable. Now you might argue this is largely because much more of the development being done today is in abstracted languages (Like Java or the .Net/Mono languages) and scripted languages (Ruby, Python - you know their names) and advances in compiler technology, the choice of processor is largely irrelevant. So the custom hardware aspect of the traditional Unix Workstation is much less attractive. Add to this the rise in Unix like operating systems on PCs (Linux et al) and it is hard to justify the Unix Workstation even for things that were considered core competencies.

      Of couse, the Mac is really a Unix Workstation today, but I think probably needs to be considered a special case.

    20. Re:Yeah, well by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For their time, lots of stuff wouldn't have been made without a drafting board, but that doesn't mean that every home had to have a drafting board.

      Computers aren't so complicated to use that you needed to grow up with one in order to be able to use it.

    21. Re:Yeah, well by happyemoticon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, letting children near a computer is mind-bogglingly dangerous. My nephews would be the best QA engineers in the world if only they didn't answer, "I didn't do anything!" any time you asked them how they broke the computer.

    22. Re:Yeah, well by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      a mobile phone that can browse the web and access e-mail
      And don't forget the 21" monitor. It's gotta have one of those. And a full keyboard and a mouse.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    23. Re:Yeah, well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "they'll figure out how important PCs are once they want to start designing those video games, cell phones, PDAs, etc.

      None of those could exist without the PC."

      The IBM PC/AT had roughly the same computing horsepower as an IBM System/370 Model 168 (COBOL benchmarks printed in an ACM publication a decode or so back).

      My Handspring Visor deluxe is, roughly in the same league and it's obsolete. My current cell phone (HTC Apache) is about a 400MHz system, overall as powerful as one of the vintage PCs doing daily web server duties here, and that about 2-3x the speed of systems I did enterprise production development work on in the mid '90's.

      I wouldn't yet care to try J2EE development on a mobile device, but I've spent a lot of my career working with devices less powerful than the average cell phone.

      I have a full-size Bluetooth keyboard to work with the phone and a Wi-Fi connection for the Internet. All I need is a hookup to a decent-sized monitor and I'm loaded for bear.

    24. Re:Yeah, well by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      and a mobile phone that can browse the web and access e-mail

      It's true that most people are only concerned with games and the Internet, but it seems hard to believe that for the latter, people will be happy with a tiny screen, and having to type by pressing on mobile phone keys. It's possible we may see the PC give way to some "Internet appliance" that gives you a keyboard and plugs into a TV. But we're not there yet - we've been hearing of "Internet appliances" and "convergence" for at least 17 years now, and it's still not happened.

      Plus, as another commenter pointed out, smartphones at least are still general purpose computers (and even non-smartphones can run Java applications). Perhaps even in future, it'll be possible to plug a phone into a keyboard, mouse and TV for when you're not on the move. Also, note that any "Internet appliance" will need to have at least some general ability to run general programs, as otherwise things like Java won't work.

      So no - the PC is here to stay. It might not be the "IBM compatible PC" anymore; it might get smaller (we already have laptops taking over desktops - but they're still PCs); we may switch to running code on virtual machines like Java and .NET rather than native code. But people will still be using computers.

    25. Re:Yeah, well by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And don't forget the 21" monitor.

      That's achievable - eyeglass monitors or Head mounted displays

      And a full keyboard and a mouse.

      For flat surfaces:
      http://www.virtual-laser-keyboard.com/images/virtual-laser-keyboard-hand.jpg

      Alternatively:
      Senseboard - which doesn't project a keyboard at all
      or

      Lightweight eyetracker with any number of On screen keyboards

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    26. Re:Yeah, well by Serhei · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't make sense even if you *were* an MBA. Unless you were an MBA working for the cell phone company.

    27. Re:Yeah, well by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Back when I was just a lad we had a Windows 95 "powerhouse" and it had a card making software package, I remember how impressed my aunts and grandmother were that the cards said "Made by *my name*" on the back.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    28. Re:Yeah, well by The+Great+Pretender · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure, I've been wondering about these trends for a while. I have a feeling that to your average consumer the PC is not a necessity and the concept of everyone owning a PC is starting to disappear. People want simple dedicated items. So if we want PVR's then a box with a hard-drive dedicated to recording TV is good, it plugs straight in, software is pre-installed etc. TV's will always be preferred to watching on a computer monitor and the average family doesn't want to waste TV time waiting for the kids to get off the computer. The smartphones have the email in the palm of the hands and if the US follows the rest of the world with texting, that's going to disappear slowly as well for personal use. So what about the people who work from home, well laptops are taking over for work, the laptops for work are normally purchased by the company, so why buy a work computer if the company lets you bring yours home. Even cameras are going directly to printers and eventually the dedicated smart-printer-with-large-LCD dedicated for photos will cover that area. Now take into account that your average Joe has all the computing power he needs right now. At home I have a 4-5 year old Dell 8300. I upped the ram, added a better graphics-card and a bigger gard-drive and it works very very well as a home PC. In fact the debate I have with my friends, is now we're getting older, buying a new PC is harder to justify as the whole gaming incentive is less important.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    29. Re:Yeah, well by stormeru · · Score: 0

      The phone companies use Excel 2007, wasn't this obvious?

    30. Re:Yeah, well by kcbrown · · Score: 1

      The fact that home computers and professional workstations are the same right now is a temporary state of affairs.

      It's not temporary as long as corporations want their employees to work 24x7, which means working from home, working while on "vacation", working while in the hospital, etc.

      --
      Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    31. Re:Yeah, well by m2943 · · Score: 1

      I think much of the Unix Workstation market (not all) as been subsumed as PCs became more capable.

      And as PCs disappear, people will go back to specialized "developer" machines, aka workstations.

      Now you might argue this is largely because much more of the development being done today is in abstracted languages (Like Java or the .Net/Mono languages) and scripted languages (Ruby, Python - you know their names) and advances in compiler technology, the choice of processor is largely irrelevant.

      This is nothing new: scripting languages, cross-platform systems, byte code formats, and machine independent languages were widely used. If anything, PCs represented a step backwards, with their strong focus on C/C++ development.

    32. Re:Yeah, well by shmlco · · Score: 1

      "If you'd read it, they specifically point out that Japanese don't bring work home and thus don't have that reason to have a PC around."

      Yeah, they have no need whatsoever to manage their music and movie libraries, or all of their digital photos or videos, or any of the other digital junk that we accumulate in the modern age . Of course, it will be "called" a Home Media Server, but a rose by any other name...

      "Separately, the article states that the upgrade cycle for companies has lengthened..."

      Which probably has more to do with the drop in sales than any culteral phenomenon. Be interesting to know the numbers for external hard drive sales.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    33. Re:Yeah, well by Mspangler · · Score: 1

      "The need to upgrade your PC every 2 years to keep up with the software is passed"

      That's it in a nutshell.

      My Mac is 5 1/2 years old, and still runs everything I need. I'm debating whether to put Leopard on it. It's not a slam dunk, as many of the hot features in Leopard are not useful for me. I did decide to try out the new iWork, which works fine.

      On the PC side, my PC at work is 4 1/2 years old, and with the recent memory upgrade runs everything I need there. Now the built-in video would puke all over the video editing I do at home, but as I don't edit video at work, it's not an issue.

      And the PC won't run Vista either, due to that video "card". And Vista won't run most of the special work related stuff either. (Office 2007 broke all sorts of stuff. I have no idea why the IT department thought that upgrade was a good idea.)

      The PC market has matured. That is what is supposed to happen. Now if Ballmer will mature things will get a lot calmer.

    34. Re:Yeah, well by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      [i]too many people at home actually make use of spreadsheets, even when preparing tax returns.[/i]

      And I'd imagine that with the right software both the PS3 and XBox 360 would make quite acceptable work machines capable of running a spreadsheet program, for example, with ease.

      I mean, what does a desktop computer have that a 360 can't do, that's relevant to your standard user? The only thing I can think of is resolution loss - a 17" LCD Monitor still has more resolution than most HDTVs.

      Another point would be if computer penetration has reached the point that the only people who don't have computers choose not to have one, and many who do have one aren't replacing it quite as often - I mean, go from a 3 year/36 month average to a 3.5 year/42 month replacement average and you'll cut PC sales by 15%.

      And, at least for normal productivity uses, there hasn't been a huge need to upgrade in the last three to four years. Does Office 2003 really do that much better than 98 or 2k? Heck, 2007 has huge interface changes for upgraders to contend with.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    35. Re:Yeah, well by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      The need to upgrade your PC every 2 years to keep up with the software is passed. The only exception today is Vista [...]

      Rubbish. A Ghz-class machine with a gig of RAM (or two if you're a heavy user) and a reasonably modern video card will run Vista, with all the bells and whistles, quite usably.

      With the exception of the video card - since Aero uses features that simply didn't exist until ~3 or so years ago (but today are in $30 cards) - that's a PC up to about 7 years old.

      This whole "Vista has high hardware requirements" meme needs to die. It's simply false.

      The real exception to "hardware is fast enough", is games.

    36. Re:Yeah, well by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      My DVR is not perceived as a "computer" because it does not have a keyboard or pointing device.

      Your DVR is not perceived as a "computer" for the same reason your micrwave isn't - because it's a single-purpose appliance. The key aspect of a device people refer to as a "computer" is that it is a *general purpose* tool.

      The issue here is not whether or not "computers" are going to go away, it's whether or not appliances are going to replace the general purpose PC.

    37. Re:Yeah, well by jrminter · · Score: 1

      It's not temporary as long as corporations want their employees to work 24x7, which means working from home, working while on "vacation", working while in the hospital, etc.

      Good point. I do a lot of data analysis at home. I'd much rather do that than live at the lab...

    38. Re:Yeah, well by nomadic · · Score: 2, Funny

      isnt a smartphone not just a small pc with a radio stack?

      And a fax machine is nothing more than a waffle iron with a telephone attached!

    39. Re:Yeah, well by Nossie · · Score: 1

      your fax machine is probably more powerful than a PC 15 years ago.

    40. Re:Yeah, well by Dragonlord_Warlock · · Score: 1

      All the gizmos are not even close to effective as getting the job done as a PC. Would a big screen TV or a Cell phone ever be able to help finish that report for work or school on time with whatever research that needs to be done. No. There will always be a need for it, even if you not a developer. Unless society is going to become a legion of couch potatoes living off of free support from the government. Yeah they may spend less time on the PC as time goes by but eliminate it, I do not think that would ever be possible, even when the I/O system disappears and replaced with a human/cybernetic link.

      --
      - Dragonlord Warlock (aka Dion) "So many computers.... so little time...."
    41. Re:Yeah, well by JustPutt2 · · Score: 1

      Great,,,,,,,,,, You nailed it!!!

    42. Re:Yeah, well by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      And I'd imagine that with the right software both the PS3 and XBox 360 would make quite acceptable work machines capable of running a spreadsheet program, for example, with ease.

      There's no imagining needed, the default install of the PS3 version of Yellow Dog Linux includes Open Office.

      Heck even the PS2 can run a spreadsheet, again with Linux:

      SIAG on a PS2 Linux kit

    43. Re:Yeah, well by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Ahh that's the attitude that helped kill the Amiga and Atari ST. There were so many computer pundits who said things like: "The Amiga and ST are fine machines with advanced features but you shouldn't buy them because you wont' be able to do your work you bring home from the office on them."

      Bah! The majority of Americans work at jobs where they don't need to bring office work home. So compatiblitly with "office software" wasn't a necessity at all. But of course in the tiny computer pundit world where they needed to do that, they assumed everyone else would too.

      Nowadays it doesn't matter at all, Google docs, Open Office, heck most home users word processing needs are simple enough they could get by with a MacWrite/Wordpad/Geowrite clone. They don't need a word processor designed with business users in mind.

    44. Re:Yeah, well by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The PC is definitely here to stay.

      The "dying" market simply represents the maturity of the technology, and that people are finally getting off the upgrade treadmill. For the past decade or two, although most notably in the past few years, it's been necessary to continually upgrade your machine if you wanted to stay on top of current capabilities. Except for people who play games, I think that's beginning to become no longer true. Or perhaps the new capabilities offered by possible hardware upgrades are no longer as compelling as they once were.

      The market has gotten saturated (I suspect moreso in Japan than here in the U.S., where you do occasionally find people who still don't own a computer), and people are not upgrading as quickly. That doesn't mean the PC is "dying," it just means that sales are going to stabilize at the replacement rate.

      Personally, I think this is a really good thing for the PC and for software. For years software has been alternately leading and chasing hardware, and there haven't been too many periods where the architecture and capabilities were stable enough to allow for many resources to be devoted to optimization and good design. If the upgrade pace slows, maybe we'll finally get a focus on quality and design, since lazy programmers won't be able to count on hardware increases to make their same bloated code get faster every year.

      I expect there'll be a shakeout, eventually, both in the hardware and software side. (The hardware side mostly shook the dead weight out during the dot-bomb, but I think there's a lot of people who are going to get squashed when sales in the established markets plateau and they can't move to other markets or get into maintenance-mode fast enough.) But computers, in general, are here to stay, and the desktop/laptop PC performs too many functions for it to easily be replaced by lots of discrete devices. It's just no longer the frontier.

      --
      "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
    45. Re:Yeah, well by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      The computer hardware people should be fine though. Computers will always need new hardware to replace the things that break or are too slow.

      Children are probably the best thing to ever happen to hardware manufacturers.

    46. Re:Yeah, well by cadeon · · Score: 1

      ... So we can play games and read our email.

    47. Re:Yeah, well by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      The only reasons I kicked it as high up as I did was for the internal HD and HDTV capability.

      Though a hacked PS2 capable of using USB flash/external drives would work, the screen is rather below today's standards.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    48. Re:Yeah, well by Sax+Maniac · · Score: 1

      Not just Excel. The spreadsheet has to have no functions in it, and be used purely as a database.

      --
      I can explanate how to administrate your network. You must configurate and segmentate it, so it can computate.
    49. Re:Yeah, well by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Your DVR is not perceived as a "computer" for the same reason your micrwave isn't - because it's a single-purpose appliance. The key aspect of a device people refer to as a "computer" is that it is a *general purpose* tool.


      Agreed. My Tivo kicks @$$ for recording/viewing TV shows, but I can't do my finances, do word processing, or surf the web on it.

      The issue here is not whether or not "computers" are going to go away, it's whether or not appliances are going to replace the general purpose PC.


      IMHO, the answer is no. Because I WANT a machine to do my finances, word processing, and web surfing. Not to mention a bunch of other stuff which I'm too busy to think of atm. Until we have an appliance that can do all those things, I'm keeping my PC.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    50. Re:Yeah, well by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I see an increase in sales of eyeglasses and contact lenses in Japan if they keep using cellphones to web surf.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    51. Re:Yeah, well by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      And they could add a full keyboard to the PS3/360, more universal connectors, bigger hard drive, CPU, RAM, etc and you'll have a PC except it is locked down by the manufacturer.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    52. Re:Yeah, well by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      The PS2 can output HD if the software supports it, as the Linux kit does. 1024x768 not good enough? It can go higher, up to 1080i with a patched Xgsx.

    53. Re:Yeah, well by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      While I'd love a small pc that had true notebook capability with me at all times, the last thing I want to do is be further shafted by a phone service provider. that is why I want this thing to come here stateside- http://www.wibrain.com/ I am really interested in trying out the integrated 3d acceleration in the new via socket as well to see what it can do-
  2. Or... by Gigiya · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They're just not upgrading every year?

    1. Re:Or... by leonbev · · Score: 1

      Exactly. There is no good reason for most folks to upgrade their PC's either. You can still surf the web, check your e-mail, and write a term paper on a 5 year old PC almost as well as a brand new one. Unless you're a PC gamer who needs the latest wizbang video card, you're probably still happy with your existing computer and want to spend your money on something else like an iPod or a flat screen HDTV.

      If Intel and AMD want to sell more PC's and laptops, they should do more to promote development of next generation mainstream apps that require the additional processing power. If something like "YouTube HD 2.0 Beta (TM)" required a quad core processor and 4 GB of RAM to run optimally, it would probably convince more folks to pony up for new hardware.

    2. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhh...don't give them ideas!

    3. Re:Or... by mordors9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But this was the year that everyone was supposed to buy a new PC so that they could start using the great new OS from Microsoft, Vista. It didn't happen so I think that a lot of manufacturers are concerned. Their projections to Wall Street probably included a spike that hasn't happened. Now they have some splainin' to do.

    4. Re:Or... by ypps · · Score: 1

      My thought exactly. And the reason behind it is that computers are no longer getting twice as fast every 1.5 years. When new computers are not always amazingly fast, consumers look for other things. Like better operating systems or better programs. Things like smaller hardware or stylish design and products that are durable (or give the impression of being durable). Or they wait a couple of years extra until something amazing comes out or until something in their computer breaks down. The industry predicted years ago that this would happen approximately now...

      For example, I have an old Radeon X800XL video card. I have been looking for a replacement that doubles my frame rates in games at the same price I paid for that Radeon. It actually took 2.5 years for that to come true with the Geforce 8800GT, that will hit stores in a week or two. How long will people keep their 8800GT cards? Probably three years the least if development continues to slow down.

    5. Re:Or... by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Bingo! A reasonable computer from three years ago is still quite capable of doing what most users need a computer for.

      Most people don't upgrade their OS. They do buy new apps. Except for graphics-intensive games, the rest of the software market tries to aim towards the lowest common denominator so that they can sell more units. Hence the lack of need for people to buy new computers. This will not get better until a new "killer app" comes out.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    6. Re:Or... by smchris · · Score: 1

      Yup, bait and switch article. Content doesn't match the headline.

      I can sympathize. I don't know if we are _perfectly_ happy with his and hers 754 boards with Athlon 64FXs and 2 gig but we are _pretty_ happy. Echoing the kid, bigger LCD screen for the MythTV (also a 754 board with two gig) is the priority here and as long as the PCs have the processing power to serve our needs (which is pretty much to say NOT gaming or home video and audio production) I don't see an emphasis on fancier peripherals as "merely" consumerist.

    7. Re:Or... by dindi · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      It also crossed my mind that they actually may have quality PC's that do not crap out as fast as you r regular brand. Not that pcs are dying on me every day, but I have a nice collection of dead parts (monitors, fans, harddisks and evena totally fried laptop).

      I know that an overheating in a 2+ year old PC would make some people just buy a new PC ($50 down, $25 a month etc..), instead actually looking into the box to see that the fan crapped out because it is bogged down by dust, cat/dog/pubic hair.

      Also if they actually use desktop machines vs laptops, repairs are much more possible without throwing the whole thing away, also less accidents happen to desktops than to laptops for the simple reason of not being carried around risky places .....

    8. Re:Or... by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      If Intel and AMD want to sell more PC's and laptops, they should do more to promote development of next generation mainstream apps that require the additional processing power.

      Don't worry. Teams of mediocre programmers ("let's just all the functions into 'classes' and then those big classes can get loaded into memory any time a little function is needed") and Flash enthusiasts are working hard to insure that their poor programming style sells more and faster hardware.

    9. Re:Or... by eqisow · · Score: 1

      I second the AC. Designing software to sell hardware encourages bloat and is unequivocally wrong. For an example, see Vista.

    10. Re:Or... by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      What?? That because less purchases are done in 2007 than 2006, they are just not upgrading every year? Ehh...

      A statistic covering the number of purchases in 2007 also obviously covers the number of new purchases due to e.g. 5 year old computers.

      And the same goes for 2006.

      So, if anything, this shows people don't feel a need to upgrade their PC's as often. Maybe every 6 years is the average now rather than every 4 years.

      I can at least agree with that from personal experiences too. I don't feel a need to upgrade as often as in the days of Windows 3.11 growing to Windows 95, then office computers going from Windows NT 4 to Windows 2000, and so on. These days, the major need for e.g. Vista isn't upgrading your 4 year old CPU, but rather ensuring you have the RAM requirement settled, and you often don't need a new PC for that.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    11. Re:Or... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      In September 1999, I got a Dell with a 450mhz PIII and 128 megs of RAM. It started off with Windows 98SE. Approx 2000 or 2001 I started double-booting linux, and eventually switched over to only linux. By running Gentoo linux with Blackbox as the WM, I was able to keep it perfectly usable until it finally died in August 2007, approx 8 years after it was manufactured. "Internet TV" would stutter/drop-frames, and editing 2560x1920 digital photos in GIMP was "leisurely", but otherwise it was nice and snappy. Web browsing, email, usenet, and spreadsheets were just as fast as my 2ghz work PC with 512 megs of ram, hampered by Windows XP and and MacAfee.

      My current main PC is an AMD64-K8 with 2 gigs of RAM. The video card has twice as much video ram as the Dell had system ram. Gentoo linux with Blackbox absolutely flies on it.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    12. Re:Or... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      My thought exactly. And the reason behind it is that computers are no longer getting twice as fast every 1.5 years.

      Yes, they are. The servers we buy today are easily twice as fast as the ones were were buying 18 months ago. The difference is (for most users) they're now (well, for probably 3 years now) well and truly "fast enough" so that the massive increase in raw power is reflected by a relatively small increase in perceived speed.

    13. Re:Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "let's just all the functions into 'classes' and then those big classes can get loaded into memory any time a little function is needed"

      You're seriously railing against OOP? Good luck to you, I guess, but I think that ship sailed fifteen years ago.

  3. To be preemptive. by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Before you argue your point against this. Look up what some other people said about the mainframe. In short: to most responses
    A. Yes there are things that PC can do that Devices cannot do as well. But a lot of people are willing to take that tradeoff for mobility
    B. No the PC will be a Dying market but will take a Long time before it dies. Look at the Mainframe market it is a dying market but it never completely dies.
    Change is scary but it will happen the trick is try to keep your sills diverse enough to account for this.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    1. Re:To be preemptive. by jgrahn · · Score: 1

      No the PC will be a Dying market but will take a Long time before it dies. Look at the Mainframe market it is a dying market but it never completely dies.

      Change is scary but it will happen the trick is try to keep your sills diverse enough to account for this.

      Few of us depend on annual PC sales for our income. This decline in hardware sales might just mean people realize that the computer they have is good enough for they few things they do with it. Or, more likely, that they have found another meaningless money sink.

      And if it it does mean fewer people use home computers, that's kind of good news for some of us. The next generation will lack talented, self-taught programmers, and there will be plenty of work for someone like me, until I'm too old to remember the Emacs keyboard combinations.

      But that's also the sad news ...

    2. Re:To be preemptive. by Orange+Crush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Depends on your definition of "PC" and "Mainframe." All those little devices *are* PCs (and are more powerful than the mainframes of the past!). The only difference is form factor. The "box on a desk" home computer may very well decline (I don't think it'll die any time soon, at least not for geeks). The "fridge-sized cabinets" sitting in datacenters feeding content to the desktop computers and mobile devices won't be going anywhere soon. If history has taught us anything, the more powerful mainframe-class computing becomes, the more stuff we find to throw at it.

    3. Re:To be preemptive. by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      But that's also the sad news ... Face the facts. There will always be n00bs. Me and the only other Linux user I know in the real world are starting to consider mass-sterilization to be a viable solution.
    4. Re:To be preemptive. by rucs_hack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A. Yes there are things that PC can do that Devices cannot do as well. But a lot of people are willing to take that tradeoff for mobility

      A lot of the current desire to stay in touch electronically was born with the PC, instant messaging and so on, but it has evolved. Who cares if a phone can do less, so long as the core functionality you need is there?

      B. No the PC will be a Dying market but will take a Long time before it dies. Look at the Mainframe market it is a dying market but it never completely dies.

      The PC is, I think, dying as an entertainment medium. No problem there, after all that wasn't why the PC came into existence, and there are other devices that are better at the most popular game types. OK the RTS is predominantly a PC thing, but that's just because the PC has better control mechanisms at present, the mouse and such. Those weren't invented for gaming though, who's to say there won't be better control systems evolving for consoles? I certainly hope so.

      Personally I'd be happy to see the PC shrink in importance in the entertainment market. For one thing they'd start to get cheaper most like, and I for one need as many as I can get in order to run the experiments that make up my hobbies. (as an aside, it's a bizarre turnabout that I am seriously pondering clustered PS3s as an alternative, but I digress).

      Besides, I am sick, really sick, of always having to upgrade some component or other to play the latest game. My main home pc has a seriously fast chip, but an old graphics card (old now that is, I didn't buy it that long ago, and it wasn't cheap), so I can't play some new games without spending the equivalent of the cost of a console. I don't want to replace the processor I have either, its perfect for my non gaming needs.

    5. Re:To be preemptive. by jbengt · · Score: 1

      You are way off base, and TFA is arguing a logical fallacy.
      They use the statistics of new computer sales to make the claim that "PC's role in Japanese homes is diminishing, . . ".
      I use those statistics to claim that most people have a good enough computer already. So PC's role in Japanese homes is growing, albeit growing more slowly, reflected in fewer sales.

  4. terabytes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "digital video recorders with terabytes of memory"

    Where? I want one!

    1. Re:terabytes? by doti · · Score: 1

      In Japan, the land of the cool gadgets.

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
  5. Diminishing sales equals diminishing use? by Gybrwe666 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder if this is true or if we are just at a place where many casual users don't need to upgrade as often? Many of the advances of the last few years have been pretty incremental, or don't affect your average end user too much. If they can browse the web, send email, and run a few apps like Word Processing and Spreadsheets, that's all they need.

    The advances of the last few years have gotten to the point where many people are satisfied and don't need to buy a new one. The only excpetion to this is the Gamer market, and I can see why gadget-crazy Japan might prefer Sony PS3 and Wii's to pc gaming.

    I wonder if the people looking purely at sales are making a pretty basic error here, though.

    1. Re:Diminishing sales equals diminishing use? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I think you're right. The trend towards buying and upgrading peripherals rather than a new computer has been going on for some time. People invest their money in a new scanner, digital camera, maybe a better printer ... or for that matter a game console. The point is that it'll be a while before that 3.4 Ghz Athlon with 2 Gb. of memory and a 320 Gb. hard drive becomes a problem. That's pretty much what has driven Intel and AMD into other markets: they did their jobs too well and the need for speed just isn't there anymore. Like you say, gamers and other power users are still there, but the vast majority of users have no compelling reason to buy a new computer. And no, I don't consider Vista to be a compelling reason. Hell, if anything Vista is a good reason to maintain the status quo.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Diminishing sales equals diminishing use? by dirtyhippie · · Score: 1

      Many of the advances of the last few years have been pretty incremental, or don't affect your average end user too much. If they can browse the web, send email, and run a few apps like Word Processing and Spreadsheets, that's all they need. For the record, it hasn't just been the "past few years" - computers haven't advanced fundamentally for the uses you list since 1994 or earlier. The dramatic gains in performance between then and now are really only good on the client side for multimedia, gaming, and eye candy.
    3. Re:Diminishing sales equals diminishing use? by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Japan has widely disseminated very high-bandwidth broadband to the masses. You might expect that this would lead to advanced computer applications beyond "browsing the web, send email, and run a few apps like Word Processing and Spreadsheets." But I guess it hasn't - makes one question why Japan bothered investing on the infrastructure.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    4. Re:Diminishing sales equals diminishing use? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Japan has never had the PC culture of the US in the first place. PCs caught on late, have always been overly expensive and their market is not PC oriented like the US is, so they'll be first to show the post-PC signs.

      I had only 1GHz machines until 1 year ago exclusively and since I've gotten new machines, the only thing that the old ones can't run are games. Then you buy a NEW notebook with dual cores that can't run games as well as a 3 year old PC with a decent video card... That lack of fully equipt PCs being sold is a huge part of the problem... if the PC can "only" do work, then nobody will care when it dies. In that respect Microsoft is directly responsible for ignoring the PC segment building XBox and killing PC gaming... now the general public simply doesn't care about PCs except for the internet. Ooops!

    5. Re:Diminishing sales equals diminishing use? by OGC · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the sales figures and people commenting on them primarily use them to show that the PC Market is decreasing (which is pretty obvious, seeing as how sales are the market). The main issue at hand is that although a PC's technological growth in the last few years has been marginal, handhelds and cellphones are now growing by leaps and bounds and finally getting to the point where they're for the most part, fully functional for the casual user, with the advantage that you have them with you wherever you go. And if you can browse all your websites and check all your e-mail on the subway trip home, then IM with your friends on your phone while watching TV or playing on your PSWii, then there's a lot less incentive to use your PC. So I wouldn't say it's so much that diminishing sales equals diminishing use, but rather the increasing sales of a viable substitute combined with diminishing sales equals diminishing use.

    6. Re:Diminishing sales equals diminishing use? by meatspray · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are correct, but more to the point:

      Warcraft
      Consoles
      End of the GHZ wars and software to utilize the speed
      Microsoft's Vista only DX10

      World of warcraft has done something that no game in history has ever done. It's made it quite ok to run on antiquated hardware. I'm not saying that the latest expansion runs fantastically on a 1.8GHz proc, but but is quite playable with a reasonable video card. Blizzard is a significant thorn in the side of hardware manufacturers, how dare they not double the specs every year?

      Consoles are making serious impovements these days. When the XBOX hit the market, it was little more than a middle upper end PC. The PS3 is an insane multi-processing platform. The WII has raised the bar on control and has a massive following.

      The more cores war has failed to capture the publics eye. Would you like your new honda with 1,2 or 4 engines.... They're just lost. And really, who needs that power right now? So you can John some hashes faster, that doesn't help your grandmother do her taxes. The lions share of app developers aren't writing for more cores. Software is stagnating, pc sales will as well. Throw vista on a desktop with all the horsepower you want and you still have a sluggish buggy, driver alienated OS, MS threw DX10 on that and people aren't writing for it. If DX10 were on XP, there would be a host of new games sitting out there waiting for you to throttle up.

      Things will kick back off again, it'll just take time.

    7. Re:Diminishing sales equals diminishing use? by rabiddeity · · Score: 1

      The only excpetion to this is the Gamer market, and I can see why gadget-crazy Japan might prefer Sony PS3 and Wii's to pc gaming.

      The reasons are actually pretty simple: availability and price. The best PC games are released first in English, and most don't get translated at all. Also, PC games are about $20 more expensive here than they are in the U.S., and there's no cheap used games market. I've seen sticker prices for new PC games in the neighborhood of 8000 yen (almost $70) while their counterparts on the other side of the pond hit $40 a month or two after release. And that's not even counting the increased cost of PC hardware here. On the other hand, a Nintendo DS Lite is about $100, and the games are $35 apiece. It's hard to fight that price point. National pride in the local games industry is icing on the cake.

    8. Re:Diminishing sales equals diminishing use? by gullevek · · Score: 1

      It has, but its directly integrated into TV sets, etc. Direct download of movies and so on. Most people dont care about a PC at home, because they mail through their mobile phone and browse on the TV which is sort of their "PC".

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
  6. fast enough by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's a good thing, since computers have been fast enough for most purposes for quite some time. If the manufacturers focus less on speed and more on size/power consumption I don't see how that's a bad thing.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:fast enough by Monkey-some · · Score: 1

      Exactly, moreover with the advent of "massive" miniaturized storage, peak of CPU power most of your devices (that could be a cell phone, gaming station, multimedia system, portable gizmo...) now do in a satisfactory manner exactly what the average user wants.

      Most people don't want to play around on the computer they want to press a button, do whatever thing they want then done. They don't focuses on the vector or the medium but on the information being transmitted over. That's the reason why most people don't give a rat ass about most subjects you may have in mind (err net neutrality, the different type of storage, even speed accesses and ''gasp'' even data conservation /rereading over time !)

      The computer as a "central appliance" (a technological altar where you give hours of your life to that pesky god) is a piece of antiquated crap who comes from the 50's or 60's where things needed to be bulky, huge, and imposing some due respect. Note that I'm not talking about business uses but mainly as personal use.
      I do still use my now old Dell inspiron 9200 (that thing uses a "pentium mobile cpu").not a blazzing speed considering nowadays performances but still more than perfect for my usage (work 99.9 % of the time).

      Now what really lacks is a "hackable" mini system like you could do with your personal computer; that's what "sucks" with this technology you have to buy to some provider a device already put together. Because even if you really want to hack your device together you may face the problem of not having the tools and skills to do so (you need a small soldering iron most of the time and basic electrical knowledge).
      Maybe one day there will be a "handeld" open standard like the pc but this won't happen that soon because now the phone companies have a strong intent in not letting that happen. Because face it those mobile services/phones are a true cow milk. ah.

  7. Sales by Wowsers · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe the lowering pc sales is a result of the quality of computers and software, rather than the other gadgets being that good?

    From my experience for example, Sony has made products which have more style over practical usage. I'm not going to pay $2000 for a styled pc which you can't use and breaks a month out of warranty.

    --
    Take Nobody's Word For It.
    1. Re:Sales by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to pay $2000 for a styled pc which you can't use and breaks a month out of warranty.

      Yeah, and which has weird drivers that you can't get off their Web site and forces you to use their branded OS. I don't know if that's the case with the newer desktop machines, but I ran into that problem with a VAIO laptop a year or so ago. It's a Windows box, stupid, so stop playing games with me. Pain in the ass. I wish Sony were more like Toshiba in that regard.

      Besides, if you really want a styled computer, just give it up and buy a Mac. You'll get more bang for your buck, and it'll last well past the warranty period. Now, I'm no particular fan of Apple Computer and I haven't owned a Mac since 1986 but let's face it ... for what it is, the Mac is pretty impressive. Sony, on the other hand, seems to be trying to compete at some level with Apple using style over substance, and honestly that's just goofy. A Windows box in a fancy molded plastic case is still a Windows box! It's akin to that other recent /. article about the toy video game that was made to look like a Wii remote. Tacky.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Sales by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have vowed never to buy a sony gadget again after seeing the quality of my PS2, hi fi and DVD player. All rubbish.

      --
      I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
  8. morphing, changing, not dying by icepick72 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The PC marketing isn't dying. It's changing. If people realized this we wouldn't have alarmist articles and we'd have a lot less useless stats. Every one of the "PC as we know it" makers today has the ability to adapt, to plan to make smaller hardware footprints, etc. We know the PC cannot totally disappear because you'll never see a room of programmers on a project sitting around compiling, testing, debugging and deploying applications using just a cell phone/PDA interface or equivalent. What is a PC? Does it really matter how small it gets? As long as some people still have access to a standard sized monitor and keyboard they will consider anything a PC, even if it's stuck to a postage stamp on your desk.

    1. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the argument about the mainframe days...

      The Mainframe marketing isn't dying. It's changing. If people realized this we wouldn't have alarmist articles and we'd have a lot less useless stats. Every one of the "Mainframes as we know it" makers today has the ability to adapt, to plan to make smaller hardware footprints, etc. We know the Mainframe cannot totally disappear because you'll never see a room of programmers on a project sitting around compiling, testing, debugging and deploying applications using just a cell PC interface or equivalent. What is a Mainframe? Does it really matter how small it gets? As long as some people still have access to a terminal they will consider anything a Mainframe, even if it can fit on top of your desk.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    2. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is entirely true. The mainframe has changed - the modern mainframe is a huge farm of commodity computers.

      You make an excellent point, it just wasn't the one you intended.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    3. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      The PC marketing isn't dying. It's changing.
      You hit the nail on the head. The PC market isn't dying. It's miniaturizing. Look at the iPhone and the future is clear. The average Joe Six-Pack (TM) won't even need or have a PC in a few years. They'll have an internet communications device that happens to be a cellphone.

      The iPhone is the first portable computing platform that shows the future potential of mobile devices. They have the potential to be your only computing device, once the software is improved enough.

      Google realizes this, Apple realizes this, and even MS realizes this (unfortunately for MS, their mobile computing platform sucks). I have a feeling that the mobile computing phenomenon will be the straw that breaks the back of the camel that is the MS desktop monopoly.
      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    4. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by asdfghjklqwertyuiop · · Score: 1

      The key difference between a "PC" and all those gadgets is opennness. You can easily start writing code for a PC without anyone else's approval, vendor resistance, expensive/proprietary SDKs, etc...

      Some gadgets are more open than others, but for the most part they generally aren't. Especially if you count game consoles, home entertainment stuff and cell phones

    5. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      So? Why does that difference matter? I suspect the majority of users/owners don't care about openess, they care about convenience, price, performance, and features.

    6. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by espressojim · · Score: 1

      That's changing back as people realize how much you can do with virtualization. When you consider how much space you need for racks, cooling costs, etc, it often makes sense to buy a few big boxes instead of a lot of tiny ones, and run virtual machines. So I'd think the market there is going to swing back as VMs get better and better. (Full disclosure, my wife works for VMWare, so I've heard a fair number of talks on how to run these numbers.)

    7. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      Most of the real server farms I've seen were running at a significant load - 30%+. It's rarely been a matter of wanting lots of computers, and generally been a matter of needing lots of CPU powers. Commodity systems seem to be the most efficient way to do this, as long as you have good failure handling (and if you don't, you're screwed anyway.)

      Then again, it was a year or so ago that I was involved in any of that.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    8. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by espressojim · · Score: 1

      I think the argument is that even if the larger servers cost more to purchase, they use less space and need less cooling for the amount of CPU power you have. So they save you a lot more money over a 3 year period. It's one of those TCO style arguments. I think there's also the bonus of having an easy way to manage the machines if the hardware is heterogeneous, as you can still put the same VM image on all the machines.

    9. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean a Beowulf Cl....

    10. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by domatic · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the mobile communications market in this country is still cranially-rectally inverted. If I get pissed at AT&T and want another provider then I also lose my email and music machine. I also lose any other function this expensive multifunction device provided me. Any device like the iPhone will have to at least approach the PC in terms of openness and be transferable to other service providers with a minimum of hassle before I'll look at it. And I don't buy that crap about open phones lousing up cell networks. Isolate the phone functionality and only provide API hooks to do things like "dial number" or "wait for ring". Furthermore, I'm not paying 6 bucks apiece for ring tones and I'm not paying 50 bucks apiece for stripped down "mobile" versions of apps. They don't want phones to work like the internet, they want future computers to work the way Ma Bell intends. Screw that noise.

      As long as the cell phone market works the way it does then I'll only use a cheap minimal cell phone for one thing and one thing only: making and taking calls.

    11. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      The iPhone is the first portable computing platform that shows the future potential of mobile devices.

      Getting off-topic, but smart phones have been around for years.

    12. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Do your taxes on an iPhone this year, and get back to me. PC's will always have a place, though their appearance may change, they may get smaller, not need upgraded as often, whatever, the concept of the PC isn't going anywhere. It'll either be a desktop or a notebook, though.

    13. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Which will bite them when the ecosystem doesn't evolve around the cheap POS that they chose to buy. Hell, look how fractured the cell phone market is, how few GOOD applications are available for any phone.

    14. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The fact that your cars engine may have a 68030 inside of it doesn't make it a macintosh.

      A pc is defined by the fact that you can run arbitrary programs
      on it. This is what separates it from a game console or even
      a toaster.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    15. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      You're not the target market for replacing your computer with an iPhone. Somebody that just uses the computer for email and web browsing is.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    16. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      Do your taxes on an iPhone this year, and get back to me. PC's will always have a place, though their appearance may change, they may get smaller, not need upgraded as often, whatever, the concept of the PC isn't going anywhere. It'll either be a desktop or a notebook, though.
      As funny as it sounds, with Turbotax.com you could do your taxes online using an iPhone.

      Remember Safari is a fully javascript enabled, standards compliant browser with PDF support. The only thing missing is flash support.
      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    17. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by Knetzar · · Score: 1

      IBM still sells mainframes. The market is smaller, but it is still alive.

    18. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the way I look at it too.

      Eventually, we really will have "Dick Tracy" wrist watch phones, that also act as wireless computing devices that are complete with several gigabytes of storage space. Likely, they will be able to connect to wireless input devices (because the keyboard really is the best writing tool humans have invented) and wireless monitors, etc. So in essence, your "PC" will be housed in a wrist watch, rather than sitting under your desk at home sucking in dust.

      I would imagine that it will be a good number of years before we have whole PCs that are as small a wrist watch, but even now it is entirely possible to build a great performing computer in an 8"x8"x1" box, including the interface devices and view screen. So, if properly designed, I am sure it would be possible to compact the average x86 PC with decent video, 4GB RAM, 64GB hard drive into the size of an old Nokia 5175 cell phone http://leonardkirk.comicbloc.com/wp-content/OldPhoneNOKIA51652.jpg (I hated that phone - battery would always fall off...) - minus the antenna, I would imagine.

      Personally, I would love to have a little brick the size of an older phone that was 100% computer, with an SD card slot, 4 micro USB ports, and a micro DVI port/converter cable. It would bluetooth to my peripherals and wirelessly stream the video at upto 1280x1024 to a view screen of some kind (not sold with the computer) - no built in LCD or input device, just a nice water resistant shell with an on button and battery light... a PC I could take in my pocket anywhere and interact with using a wide array of 3RD party peripherals, just like a desktop PC.

    19. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      A pc is defined by the fact that you can run arbitrary programs
      on it. This is what separates it from a game console or even
      a toaster.


      [CronoCloud@midgar CronoCloud]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
      cpu: MIPS
      cpu model: R5900 V3.1
      system type: EE PS2
      BogoMIPS: 392.39
      byteorder: little endian
      unaligned accesses: 89169717
      wait instruction: no
      microsecond timers: no
      extra interrupt vector: yes
      hardware watchpoint: no
      VCED exceptions: not available
      VCEI exceptions: not available

      [CronoCloud@midgar CronoCloud]$ cat /etc/redhat-release
      PS2 Linux release 1.0

      [CronoCloud@midgar CronoCloud]$ echo "print \"For such a low user ID, Jedidiah must not have been paying much attention the last 5 years.\"" | python
      For such a low user ID, Jedidiah must not have been paying much attention the last 5 years.

    20. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 1

      You still haven't answered the question.

      Why does it matter, now, to a consumer buying a $300 gadget to read email, view pictures, browse the web, etc, that it is open or closed? If a person is to decide between buying a PC vs buying a cell phone, what does the open platform matter if it doesn't make the device more usable, more affordable, or more attractive?

      It will matter when the device is end of lifed in four years and the user wants to keep the device to extend it's useful lifespan... but even in the US there is a car culture where you get a new vehicle every four years!

    21. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      That's not as big a market as you might think. Even Aunt Tilly needs a place to store her cookie recipies. AFAIK, you still can't do that on the iPhone.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    22. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      As funny as it sounds, with Turbotax.com you could do your taxes online using an iPhone.


      Personally, I'd rather store my financial records on my own box.
      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    23. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You could get a PC expansion kit for the Adam and the Colecovision too.

      That didn't make them PC's (or home computers) in their pristine state either.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    24. Re:morphing, changing, not dying by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      There was the standalone Adam computer, which also played Colecovision games, and there was also the Adam Expansion for the Colecovision. Two separate products. The standalone Adam was a most certainly a personal computer out of the box. And even if the standard Colecovision wasn't a computer out of the box, it was designed to make it easy to make it one.

  9. Saturated market. by cuby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    PCs are not vanishing, only the number of people that don't have one.
    What is the point of a new computer when the existing one do the tasks you need.

    --
    Math is beautiful... e^(pi*i)+1=0
    1. Re:Saturated market. by owlnation · · Score: 1

      What is the point of a new computer when the existing one do the tasks you need.
      Vista has no doubt also added to the number of people not bothering to upgrade.
    2. Re:Saturated market. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mistakenly bought a vista PC thinking it wouldn't be that bad. Spent the next two weeks tracking down XP drivers...

    3. Re:Saturated market. by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      Eventually every home HAS a PC so then the market is not one of growth, but of upgrades and replacements. Superficially, this will appear to be a declining market. i built my rig almost 3 years ago. Upgrades are keeping me current. Eventually i'll break down and buy that second video card to make use of SLI. But for now, i'm good. Since i built my rig, do i count as a "lost sale" or "decline in PC sales"?

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  10. *yawn* by Kipper+the+Llama · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We're at a point where most non-hardcore gamers/mulitmedia types don't need to stay abreast of the upgrade cycle. This isn't the 1990s anymore, though a lot of us here like to imagine it is. There are a lot of things a PC does that no other machine does well (word processing, spreadsheets, etc.) that even average consumers need. Then we get to the fact that PCs can do a range of tasks that it would take half-a-dozen other machines to accomplish. "Death of the PC" stories are nice to get people riled, but they don't have much substance.

    1. Re:*yawn* by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of things a PC does that no other machine does well (word processing, spreadsheets, etc.) that even average consumers need.


      That might have been the case in the past, but some of the more powerful dedicated devices can run in a less dedicated general purpose computing device mode. (PS2's and PS3's being good examples of that)

      As for needing word processing and spreadsheets. I'd have to disagree on that, that's a myth created by the Microsoft/Intel hegemony ages ago to try to keep home users from staying with Commodore and Atari. "you'll need to bring home work from the office so you need to run Wordperfect/WordStar/PC Write and Lotus 123. Those toy computers can't run those, so you gotta go with a machine with an intel CPU running one of our fine Microsoft operationg systems"

      Frankly, Wordpad (or something similar) is enough of a word processor for most home uses, and personally I've never had the need for a spreadsheet, though I do have a simple spreadsheet app installed.
    2. Re:*yawn* by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      So, does your cellphone run Wordpad? I don't use a spreadsheet, but I do use Quicken. I don't think even the newest iPhones run that yet.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    3. Re:*yawn* by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      No Wordpad, though it does have a simple notetaker. I was referring more to things like PS2's/PS3's which can easily run something Wordpad-ish.

  11. Do realize, though... by jamar0303 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is primarily because cellphones in Japan aren't pieces of crap like those sold in the US. Helio's only starting to turn that around right now, and they're the only carrier I'd support if I returned to America. Here in China I get the best of both- advanced phones (Samsung and LG like to give the Chinese market nearly all of what they have given the Korean market) and cheap prices. For example, prepaid runs less than $.01/min, and I can get 450 minutes/month for $8. Beat that, AT&T. Oh, and population density- China Unicom's quite willing to cover the mountains where there are approximately 5 people/sq.km, as opposed to AT&T where I get spotty coverage at best in downtown Nashville (better than before I moved to China where I couldn't even get any coverage on AT&T).

    --
    OSx86 FTW
    1. Re:Do realize, though... by schnikies79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't believe that whiz-bang cellphones would do as good in the USA as they would in Asia. Asia is much more gadget-oriented than Americans are, not to say there would be no market, just not a strong market.

      --
      Gone!
    2. Re:Do realize, though... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      Wow, not that I don't believe you, but I live in Shanghai and they don't have deals anywhere near that good.

      And as far as I know, all the coolest phones are also available in the US, and a few cool phones are available in the US that aren't available in China (iPhone being the most obvious).

      True the average urban Chinese cell phone is nicer than the average cell phone in the US, but that's just how Chinese people roll, rather than a lack of availability in the US market.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    3. Re:Do realize, though... by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      You live in Shanghai, so you'd know that iPhones are available at practically every vendor in the Xujiahui area, as well as any other place that specializes in unlocked phones, so if there's a cool phone that's not available in China, it's not the iPhone. For the "cool phone available in China, not the US" I present the Moto Z1, E685, and the StarTAC 2004. Yeah, they're not feature-packed, it's not that which defines cool. Also that good deal that you can't seem to find (450 minutes for $8/month)? It's China Unicom's GSM50 plan. Wouldn't expect you to know of it if you don't speak Chinese or dig deep into their site, though.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    4. Re:Do realize, though... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      You can't just do money comparisons, because the cost of labor is the biggest part of rolling out and maintaining a network, and the cost of leasing the land to put a cell tower on is probably a lot different too. Which isn't to say that AT&T isn't evil, but it's easy to pick the worst example in a given region.

      That cost that you pay probably represents a lot more to the average Chinese person than the equivalent fees would in the US.

    5. Re:Do realize, though... by Shilaeli · · Score: 0

      It's not so much to do with Japan being more gadget oriented or having better Phones. People in Japan just use their phones for web browsing and email because it's cheaper and more convenient. Sprint's network is comparable to au/KDDI Japan's 2nd largest provider, although although EV-DO was rolled out years before Sprint did. I'm pretty sure some of our Smartphones, Treos, Blackberrys, and iPhones are similarly adequate at browsing the web the way they do. A lot Japanese websites are also much easier to navigate from a cell phone. Look at the massively popular site 2chan.net for example. All of the content is so small that it would fit conveniently in an instant messenger chat box.

    6. Re:Do realize, though... by knorthern+knight · · Score: 1

      > It's not so much to do with Japan being more gadget oriented or having better
      > Phones. People in Japan just use their phones for web browsing and email
      > because it's cheaper and more convenient.

      Japanese make more use of "smart cellphones" because the cellphone manufacturers build cellphone keyboards appropriate for the hands of a 5-foot Oriental, rather than a 6-foot Caucasian. My cellphone is a Nokia 6015i "candy bar", and I hope it lasts for a long while. Some of the new cellphones on the market I could only use by...
      - laying them on a table
      - viewing it through a large "Sherlock Holmes" magnifying glass
      - use a sewing needle to press the keys to dial a phone number

      There is a point beyond which miniturization is *NOT* what I want.

      --

      I'm not repeating myself
      I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    7. Re:Do realize, though... by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Do yourself a favor- get a Toshiba 904T, use it, and come back to me about that miniaturization bit.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    8. Re:Do realize, though... by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      I used 2 metro areas as comparison. Shanghai is completely covered by China Mobile and Unicom, while Nashville is barely covered and its suburbs have 0 coverage for me. I think that it shouldn't cost that much to maintain towers for a fairly large metro area, right?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    9. Re:Do realize, though... by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Yeah yeah the US cell phone market really sucks dirt, but that is not anything new. The advantage that countries like Korea and Japan have is that compared to the US they are geographically small. It takes less investment to cover someone wherever they might like to make a call in Korea or Japan as opposed to having that same person covered, with excellent call quality, from anywhere in the US that they might want to make calls. The advantage that China had, and still has for the most part, is that until recently there really wasn't much there. They could install new technologies fast because there was no existing infrastructure to speak of. It is much easier to do a bang up job and quickly when you can start with a relatively clean slate. Now contrast that to the United States where there is massive existing infrastructure and regulations to be dealt with. Now, I know that this cannot completely explain the horrible cell service here in the United States, Europe (which has similar infrastructure and regulation issues, but somewhat less size) has better service as well. I am still holding out hope that something good will come from the 700 mhz spectrum auction, but more likely is that telco monopolies, cough...verizon...cough, will buy up the spectrum just to keep it out of the hands of sharper competitors like Google and halt or delay the roleout of newer better services while they squeeze the American public for a few more decades to recover their investments in the existing technologies.

      BTW: That same 450 minutes that you get for $8 in China costs me 5 times that much here in the United States...sigh at least we can still say whatever we want in this country, even if it is monitored and recorded for data mining and generation of the no-fly list.

  12. Since my PC died the other week by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been using my Wii to browse the net.
    In fact, I'm typing this comment with it.

    It works well, especially since the wiiware USB keyboard code upgrade, but for some reason, I can't reply to my gmail messages or view videos made with a more recent version of flash... hopefully these issues will be resolved soon with an update.

    For the rest of my online needs, I use the workplace computer.

    1. Re:Since my PC died the other week by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 1

      I could never imagine doing anything meaningful with the Wii given the low resolution of the display. My PS3 works pretty well for browsing either with the default PS3 system software or Yellowdog Linux... but even at 1080p with my 46" LCD, it still is a bit cumbersome. I really just use it to show Youtube videos occasionally, which is always a sharp contrast to Blu-ray movies...

    2. Re:Since my PC died the other week by Shados · · Score: 1

      I don't have a PS3, but considering 1080P = 1920*1080, which is more than most monitors people have, if its cumbersome, its not because of the resolution, thats for sure...

      480p (720*480) is a bit on the low side, I'll agree, but aside when fonts are very tiny on some web sites, zooming out you can do a bit. It worked for me, for about 30% of things I'd do on the net (no, I don't do porn, even on PC).

    3. Re:Since my PC died the other week by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      you have a point in that I don't do anything meaningful online with my wii, except post comments on blogs and such. the resolution issue is not supercritical, given that you can zoom in and out, but it's an annoyance. Sites that are designed to be browsed with, for example, an iPhone, are ok to view with a wii.

      stuff I wish I could do on the wii (instead of the workplace computer):
      edit and post photos
      copy-paste text and links

      But I can do that stuff at work...

    4. Re:Since my PC died the other week by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      480p (720*480) is a bit on the low side, I'll agree

      Did you know that long ago, 640x480 was considered a "good" resolution? In the early days of the internet, it was pretty common, and you could expect to get flamed if your web site didn't look right in it. 800x600 was very nice, and 1024x768 was for people who had big, expensive monitors.

      (no, I don't do porn, even on PC).

      Don't worry, you will when you're older.

    5. Re:Since my PC died the other week by Zepalesque · · Score: 2, Funny

      "for the rest of my online needs, I use the workplace computer."

        I have found that the workplace computer is excellent for reading Slashdot...

    6. Re:Since my PC died the other week by Shados · · Score: 1

      Wow, who would have thought, 640x480 existed, really?

      No DUH. Whats your point? I haven't seen a mainstream web site that looked adequate in 640x480 in years, thus my comment. Don't worrie, I was around loooooooooong before the internet. I don't do porn because I outgrew it. I did too when I was your age, but it was a while ago. You'll outgrow it too when you try the real thing (probably when YOU are older).

      Now all I'd need is a good "Back in my days..." come back...

    7. Re:Since my PC died the other week by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      1080P isn't enough? Gee the screen on my WinXP latop bought in 2003 is 1024x768! Maybe your problem is not the resolution but the size of your screen. Maybe a 20 inch 1080P would be better for PS3 Linux so your eyes won't have to scan across a large 46" display.

    8. Re:Since my PC died the other week by Teriblows · · Score: 1

      "I don't have a PS3, but considering 1080P = 1920*1080, which is more than most monitors people have, if its cumbersome, its not because of the resolution, thats for sure... " probably the resolution relative to size of the screen. its why the 30" lcds for pc/mac have double that resolution. for text what matters is sharpness and pixel density, not overall size unless you are doing a presentation. lower dpi text on a large screen would be clumbersome. connecting two displays of different sizes to a ps3 is also clumbersome, so its not a good solution

  13. report from the field by dancingmad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I fully expect a ton of comments on how the PC is vital to every day life these days, but I live in Japan as an English teacher (wanted to be back for a bit before going to school again) and I can tell you it seems like the article is right.

    In the big electronics stores, like K's or Yamada Denki, PCs aren't the big draws - it's other stuff, including TVs.

    Out of my middle school students, many of them don't use PCs on a regular basis and many of the high school students I know don't either (though I am in basically the Arkansas of Japan, but even when I lived in Osaka, I felt like this was true). Those that do don't have their own, they use their parent's. Most of what we do on a PC, including casual games, e-mail, and web surfing (and increasingly other things - my cell phone has a decent 2MB camera [a friend of mine has the summer's top of the line au phone with a 5MB], an MP3 player with iTunes like software ([au's lismo service]), Japanese/English dictionary, and simple Japanese OCR).

    It's part of the reason why the web channel on the web was a big deal. For Americans, it just meant we might not have had to get out of bed to check Gmail, but for a lot of Japanese is was an important vector onto the Internet.

    That said, when I went to college in Japan a lot of my friends ending up buying laptops or using them extensively in the school's various computer labs. And at work now, everyone can use a PC and desktop publishing / graphics (granted, I work at a town cultural hall, so they might come to the job with some of those skills already). One of my coworkers is even a Mac guy and another, the main graphics guy is thinking about upgrading from his Toshiba to a MacBook. Stuff like Macs and the iPod are going more ground here.

    And the internet culture here is still pretty big - most people my age know about 2chan, even if they don't post and the big drama from two years ago was Densha Otoko, based on a supposedly true story about a nerdy anime fan who met a beautiful girl, began dating her, and asked for help on 2chan. You can still get 2chan's mascot, noma neko dolls around as well. Mixi (an invite only Japanese facebook site) and other internet groups are still pretty big here, so it's not like the things computers represent are going away, but rather PCs like devices, like phones and game consoles, are taking their place.

    --
    "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    1. Re:report from the field by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      Er, about the camera, I of course meant 2 and 5 megapixels, not megabytes, though this does lead to something interested as well. I don't use it, but my camera has a miroSD card slot, so one can store music, pictures, etc. on it, further lessening the need for a dedicated PC, especially for the younger set.

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    2. Re:report from the field by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      Agh, I gotta use that preview button. In that truncated last sentence in the middle, my point is most of those features for my phone I listed are comparable to a PC. There are original Final Fantasy games and ports of the first few Dragon Quest games. My au phone came with Puyo Puyo Fever for free. It's not as pretty as the PSP version but it's far less conspicuous when I am slacking off on a train or something.

      Even for the net and applications that use it, at au (it it's probably similar for docomo and softbank) the most I can ever pay for using the internet on my cellphone is around $40 on top of my cellphone bill. If I were Japanese and I didn't have a huge need for a computer, a top of the line cell and then internet on top of that seems like it might be a better deal.

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    3. Re:report from the field by owlnation · · Score: 1

      Yeah... but wake the rest of us up when Final Cut Pro and Photoshop are available on the iPhone.

      The average desktop PC monitor is still far too small for professional editing.

    4. Re:report from the field by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      So put a VGA/DVI/S-Video/somesmallvideoport on the side of the cell phone and hook it to your monitor. Unless wireless video transmission becomes viable.

      Getting Photoshop on a cell phone is a different story.

    5. Re:report from the field by kharchenko · · Score: 1

      I live in Japan as an English teacher ..snipOut of my middle school students, many of them don't use PCs on a regular basis and many of the high school students I know don't either

      So how do they write the English essays? I understand how PC is loosing out in terms of playing music, IM and other trivial stuff, but it seems to me that heavy PC utilization is unavoidable for school and work. Basically it's on every office workers' desk, and I don't see any real alternative emerging.

    6. Re:report from the field by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Unless wireless video transmission becomes viable.

      I've heard they have this newfangled thing called TV now.

    7. Re:report from the field by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      To my ears, a big distinction emerges from your comments about Japanese computer and internet usage. You refer to the 'web channels' and to this '2chan.' It sounds like young people in Japan don't particularly wander around the 'web' the way people in some other places do. The web gets packaged and homogenized in other places, too, but I don't hear it described the way you are describing it. Microsoft tried to 'channel' our Web with IE 4.0 and it failed dismally.

    8. Re:report from the field by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can still get 2chan's mascot, noma neko dolls around as well.
      ITYM mona. As in "omae mo na".
    9. Re:report from the field by shoemilk · · Score: 1

      Japanese students write everything by hand (at least at the junior high school level). Also, <i>maybe</i>an above average high school student could write a short (like two paragraphs) "essay" in English. The only time students really need to use a PC in Japanese school life is to teach them how to use it to prepare them for using one at work.

    10. Re:report from the field by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      So put a VGA/DVI/S-Video/somesmallvideoport on the side of the cell phone and hook it to your monitor.

      Presumably you want a keyboard and mouse too ... at which point, how is that not a personal computer?

    11. Re:report from the field by dancingmad · · Score: 1

      What makes you think the average user needs photo editing?

      Even that considered, I can do basic photo editing on my phone - rotating, cropping, and adding text and stamps.

      And my phone has TV on it as well.

      Who needs a PC?

      The iPhone is not the most advanced phone in the world, by the way.

      --
      "There is no time, sir, at which ties do not matter," Jeeves, (Jeeves and the Impending Doom)
    12. Re:report from the field by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't there a big fuss about that some time ago? About how noma-neko was a ripoff of mona?

      --
      OSx86 FTW
    13. Re:report from the field by Weedlekin · · Score: 1

      "So how do they write the English essays? I understand how PC is loosing out in terms of playing music, IM and other trivial stuff, but it seems to me that heavy PC utilization is unavoidable for school and work."

      Well blow me down, and there was me thinking that all the school work I did during the 1960s and 1970s without any PCs at all actually existed, instead of obviously being a mere dream caused by advanced age-induced brain rot. It was a strangely detailed dream, too: we had these things called "pens" and "pencils" with a tip which left marks on paper if they were moved around, so they were capable of both writing _and_ drawing, and we used them on books with sheets of blank paper in them that got handed to teachers for marking, and were returned to us the next day. I even dreamt that we had special devices called "rulers"that could be used to ensure that the lines we drew with these strange implements were straight and the right length, while others known as "compasses" that looked like a pair of arms with a hinge at the top allowed us to draw circular figures of varying sizes. This strange fever-dream of mine also had things called "libraries" with large collections of "books", strange devices containing paper pages with text on them that seemed to work despite not having anywhere obvious to put batteries or any electrical leads or sockets. To show how weird this dream was, I lived in a strange that had a monitor-like device which displayed images and produced sound without any obvious boxes such as DVD players, satellite /cable receivers, computers, games consoles, or other such devices to produce them, so it must have worked by some sort of "dream magic" (which, as is typical in dreams, wasn't explained at all).

      --
      I'm not going to change your sheets again, Mr. Hastings.
  14. Perhaps not that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The future of PCs isn't bright."

    Of course it is. PCs will always be with us, they will just be in the tv or phone perhaps, where they work every time. What future isn't bright is that of the stand alone PC that has a piece of shit OS or a hardware lock-in or needs too much configuration but makes its CEO bazillions of dollars for your suffering.

    1. Re:Perhaps not that bad by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      Current embedded systems aren't much better, with exception to Linux-based OS's

  15. Software not Hardware Problems. by twitter · · Score: 0

    Maybe the lowering pc sales is a result of the quality of computers and software, rather than the other gadgets being that good?

    Declining sales are a direct result of the M$ domination and digital restrictions. No one wants Vista but they would it it did what half of the set top boxes did. People want MythTV and a website that shares their photo album. Free software offers the best quality versions of what people want and Japan has more than enough network to support it. Thanks to the M$ domination it's hard to get a PC with anything but Vista and sales reflect this world wide, not just in Japan. Hardware is more than capable but it's been crippled by media publishers who would be happy to see general purpose computing and the internet dissapear.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

    1. Re:Software not Hardware Problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter, if you are tired of seeing Microsoft and Windows even existing, here's what you can do about it.

      You can pick one or two.

      1.
      -Go Find a cliff or a bridge somewhere
      -Take your entire fucktarded family
      -Have all of them jump off to their deaths
      -Jump to you death

      2.
      -Find a razor
      -Run a hot bath
      -Slit your fucking wrists
      -Place wrists in hot water until death

      When you do either you will no longer see Windows/Microsoft and we won't have to put up with fucktards like you again.

    2. Re:Software not Hardware Problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      3. Have dick sucked by M$ fanboys for five years. At that point, M$ will be broke.

      Only losers do as Bill Gates says.

    3. Re:Software not Hardware Problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      M$ is where it is because it broke the law, 99.9% of the company worth derives from few conviction in IP violations and anti-competitive behavior. Unfortunately, US courts choose to protect a US company, rewarding unlawful gains rather then penalizing them. Consumer groups and foreign courts are now the only hope for justice.

      M$ has never had a successful product that they've created, they clone other people's stuff and use their OS to kill of the originals.

    4. Re:Software not Hardware Problems. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At that point, M$ will be broke. That is what you communist linsux loving fucktard said for years, and guess what, they are still around doing nothing illegal. The only ones whining are you communist linsux/open-sores loving fucktards. All you communist linsux/opensores loving fucktards should go out and slit your fucking wrists.

      GO AHEAD FUCKING FLAME AWAY FUCKTARD!
  16. Market Saturation by tcgroat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The article cites companies saying their growth market is in countries where most people have never owned a PC before, and also that existing customers see no compelling reason to upgrade. The average user is happy with the PC they have, indeed they don't even use all the system capability they already own. They prefer to spend their money on something else. In the wealthy "developed" world, a PC now is a commodity appliance rather than a trendy status symbol. It's all part of an innovation becoming a mature product.

    1. Re:Market Saturation by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I think you hit the nail on the head there. I mean, as long as computers were doubling all kinds of capacities in two years then staying on the upgrade threadmill made sense. A lot of people have talked about the Macs long lifespan, I simply think a little of that is spreading to PCs. When you take one step back the purchase rate of the last 20 years has been a freak of nature, where completely usable but yet obsolete PCs were being replaced in great numbers. It was bound to stop as soon as a) the pace finally slowed down or b) average people stopped needing more power. What you're seeing is probably just the return back to normal economics where you wait until a device is worn out / broken before you replace it.

      In short, yes the corrolation is there but I'm not sure the causation is there. That we're finally able to make small devices really useful and that we're flattening out on what we can do with a large beige box means sales of mobile devices go up and PCs down, but I don't see it following that the PC will disappear. To me it comes down to basic UI issues, fiddling with the cell phone and its tiny screen is tiring. I think that in the future we might see docking in laptops though - plug your mobile into a laptop for proper keyboard and screen. We know from ultraportable laptops that you can make the key elements of a PC really small - maybe in the future the "PC" is carried around, and all we got are difference interface options, like laptop here, 50" LCD there and direct cell phone UI on the go. Which would actually be rather cool....

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  17. Which is why by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The year of Linux on the desktop is irrelevant, because the desktop itself is irrelevant. Linux flood fills computing niches. It's already everywhere.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Which is why by calebt3 · · Score: 1

      I read a sig/post here at /. some time ago: "2008 will be the year of the Linux desktop. Unfortunately, it will also be the year of the laptop."

  18. Re:cookin up a mug of by calebt3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    How on earth did this particular meme come to be in the first place? Did someone horribly misspell 'First Post'?

  19. Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "And in Japan, kids now grow up using mobile phones, not PCs. The future of PCs isn't bright."

    Jesus, that must be the most stupid statement of the year.

  20. Right by certain+death · · Score: 0

    and when they all go blind from staring at those tiny assed screens, we will have them right where we want them...okay, not really, but who can surf the web on a smart phone and really enjoy it? NOT ME! I can't get a good view of my pr0n let alone anything else!!!

    --
    "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
    1. Re:Right by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      I have it: Mobile phones with 15 inch screens and full querty keyboards!

      Chuck in a hard disk, sound card and USB port. Wicked!

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  21. Um, smartphones ARE PCs. by aussersterne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    PC = Personal Computer

    My smartphone has MS Office compatible word processor, spreadsheet, and database. It sends email and browses the web. It takes photos and manages my budget. It has an always-on map (Google Maps) that I can use to get my position and/or directions anywhere.

    It IS a personal computer.

    PCs aren't dying, they're getting integrated more closely into our lives.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    1. Re:Um, smartphones ARE PCs. by SirLurksAlot · · Score: 1

      My smartphone has MS Office compatible word processor, spreadsheet, and database.

      While I don't doubt that your smartphone has these features, I find it highly unlikely that you actually use them for anything non-trivial. Can you honestly say that you create and edit multi-page Word docs and functional spreadsheets? I don't know about you but I find entering more than about five full words (meaning not IM gibberish) to be an almost excruciatingly painful process on a cell phone (smart or otherwise). My thumbs are as good as anyone else's, but come one!

      A cell phone or palm device is not a replacement for a PC. Sure, it might work in a pinch, but as far as getting actual work done on an everyday basis there is simply no way it can compete with a PC.

      --
      God, schmod. I want my monkey man!
    2. Re:Um, smartphones ARE PCs. by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be that way, the little PIC controller I coded a timer into and put into a little box from Rat Shack is a 'Personal Computer.'

      Sure, all it does is wake up from a hardware interrupt when I push the single button on the side, then blink the single LED that is it's only output 240 times, once a second, then go back to sleep (it's a 4 minute timer,) but it's programmable and has a CPU in it.

      So it IS a Personal Computer.

    3. Re:Um, smartphones ARE PCs. by MayorDefacto · · Score: 1

      My smartphone has MS Office compatible word processor, spreadsheet, and database

      Yeah, but without a proper full-sized input device, how productive are you really going to be in those applications? I *hate* the touchscreen "keyboard" on the iPhone, and the teeny-tiny chicklet keys on Crackberrys and Treos aren't any better. Don't get me started on using the Wiimote to hunt and peck in Wii Opera (which is why Nintendo was totally right to introduce the USB keyboard driver).

      About the best mobile device keyboard I've seen is the slide-out one on the HTC line of smartphones, but even then, composing something that's even the length of this post would take way longer and be way more of a PITA than it's worth.

      I'm still not sold on ditching my laptop for a smartphone just yet.

  22. Average people don't need PCs by foniksonik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They need applications.

    People need something to do personal finances, write up school homework, manage their photos and music and to send emails and surf the web.

    Average people need a nice powerful PDA in a sub-notebook form factor that can hook up to a large screen and they need a PDA/Phone that fits in their pocket that can sync up with their full size PDA.

    AVerage people don't care about writing their own software or customizing their experience (beyond wallpaper and ringtones)....

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    1. Re:Average people don't need PCs by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People referring to average people tend to undershoot what average people need and underestimate the average person. The sooner we stop dealing with averages, the better.

      There is a quite good talk that summarizes this in another context. It is worth watching in my opinion. The relevant gist of it is that we shouldn't cater for the average or "the biggest group" because the average is usually, only a relative majority of the market.

      What we should be doing is to look for clusters of users, not just the biggest cluster you can generally find, and say: "Hey! If we try to follow the mythical average, a lot of people won't like it! They'll be left unhappy and their needs aren't catered to, even though they are not small groups. Let's find out what our users really want, take the top 4-5 clusters and market to those groups independently. This will cover 90-95% of the people on the market instead of 45-65%!".

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    2. Re:Average people don't need PCs by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Sorry i was responding to an article submission which clearly was talking about a majority of average people, by average I mean typical and by typical I mean what they do on a daily basis as individuals (as opposed to employees of a company).

      What you describe is already happening.... it's called niche marketing... and has been for decades. In fact you support my statement that typical users don't need a generalized solution. They need several niche targeted appliances.

      My first niche target was inclusive of the largest group (which you won't find in an online demographic... as hey are mostly offline), whom need to do electronic-connected versions of the things they've always done. There are other niches out there of course, I'll leave it to marketers to find them and cater to their needs.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    3. Re:Average people don't need PCs by master_p · · Score: 1

      "AVerage people don't care about writing their own software or customizing their experience (beyond wallpaper and ringtones)...."

      I don't blame them. If I was not a programmer, Java/C#/C++/C/Python/Perl/etc would scare the hell out of me...

  23. Japan is different by TorKlingberg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This may not mean much at all for other countries. Home PCs has never caught on in Japan the same way as in Europe and the USA. The gaming market is completely dominated by consoles. Games like World of Warcraft haven't even been translated into Japanese, and very few play the English version.

  24. At least *we* could try to get it right... by pla · · Score: 0

    digital video recorders with terabytes of memory

    To think, we often wonder how Joe Average can manage to screw up such a basic concept, and now we get it in a Slashdot FP???

    C'mon, guys - Memory != Storage. Write it 100 times.

    1. Re:At least *we* could try to get it right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To think, we often wonder how Joe Average can manage to screw up such a basic concept, and now we get it in a Slashdot FP???

      It's the curse of success. After exhausting the geek demographic, the only way to make more revenue (ad impressions) is for slashdot is to expand into the unwashed masses. And to do so, dumb down its contents to appeal to said masses. When this works, slashdot is a mainstream media and a new geek site will appear.
      It's inevitable, just like leaves fall off trees and grow back in spring.

    2. Re:At least *we* could try to get it right... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      What exactly are you smoking? So I've got an embedded pc thing, all it has for storage or memory is flash. Its the same freaking chip! its used for memory, and storage. you might be too young, but the book I had for intro to computers in 7th grade had a diagram of the computer parts. "Storage" wasn't listed. There was only primary memory (RAM), and secondary memory ( which could be a tape drive, or floppy).

      Yes, people get confused at talk about ram as if it was a hard drive, and visa versa, but its really the OS that makes the designation of what will be used in each role (think about virtual memory for a sec).

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    3. Re:At least *we* could try to get it right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And anyway, it's tebibytes. Strange you didn't notice that...

      Remember people - tera is not a power of 2! Write it 10^12 times!

    4. Re:At least *we* could try to get it right... by pla · · Score: 1

      What exactly are you smoking? So I've got an embedded pc thing, all it has for storage or memory is flash.

      That counts as a relatively unusual situation and you know it. Don't play naive.

      Yes, we may understand that, fundamentally, you can use battery-backed RAM as storage and HDDs as virtual memory... But we make can say that fully understanding what we say and the difference between the two. When Joe Average conflates RAM and HDD, he does so because he has no grasp of the difference, not because he understands the difference so thoroughly that he can look beyond that and speak of the similarities.



      Yes, people get confused at talk about ram as if it was a hard drive

      And for that reason, we of all people need to use care in how we refer to such things. The FP clearly didn't mean to refer to something used as RAM, it meant to refer to storage. And not in the flash "memory" sense, in the "big HDD" sense.

    5. Re:At least *we* could try to get it right... by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      But you can't make fun of people for using language that is correct, just because they don't understand that exactly why its correct. Thats just spitefully elitist. I personally don't like to be made fun of when I try to tell my mechanic what I think is wrong with my car, when I confuse classical music styles, or confuse monet with manet. So I try to extend the same courtasy to everyone else who doesn't have the same computer expertise I do.

      Plus, sometimes talking with some one who is completely ignorant about the subject, they through their ignorance spout out something that sounds crazy upon first thought, but is actually a brilliant non conventional way of doing it.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  25. One thing about Japan. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    Their currency has been deflating year on year for a decade or so. This is important for manufacturers because it means that the money becomes more valuable over time, not less valuable. This means that when you're spending that money, you want to spend it on something which will last a long time, you buy quality rather than crap. When a currency is inflating, it's best to get rid of it quickly knowing that the longer you hold it the less it's worth. People become less choosy about buying cheap crap.

    The result is that the more inflation there is the more disposable the society becomes. PCs are inherently disposable, 2-3 years before being surpassed or upgraded. As the article suggests, making the PC a sort of home hub is probably the best option for producers there. Something like MythTV should go down well.

    --
    Deleted
  26. Embedded technology by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Back in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, some outfit sold a household electric motor.

    That's right. Just a motor.

    These days people don't go out and buy electric motors, but there are probably several within 50 feet of where you are sitting, including maybe one in your wristwatch and several in your PC.

    The PC is rapidly becoming an embedded appliance or in some cases a mix between an appliance and a PC.

    Embedded appliances include routers, DVRs, regular cell phones, car radios, mp3 players, network-attached-storage devices, and other gadgets.

    Mixed devices include PalmPilots, iPhones, and other hand-held computing devices that outperform the full-sized PCs of yesteryear as well as Living-Room/Media-Center computers that specialize in media presentation but are usable as PCs. The latter are usually more powerful than your typical desktop PC.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Embedded technology by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      Back in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, some outfit sold a household electric motor.

      Nitpickery: I think you mean late 19th and early 20th centuries. :)

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    2. Re:Embedded technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Living-Room/Media-Center computers that specialize in media presentation but are usable as PCs. The latter are usually more powerful than your typical desktop PC."

      Media Center PCs are not "usually more powerful than your typical desktop PC", they're not marketed towards the performance crowd.

    3. Re:Embedded technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These days people don't go out and buy electric motors, but there are probably several within 50 feet of where you are sitting, including maybe one in your wristwatch and several in your PC.
      Actually, though it's nitpicking... they do. It's called a Dremel tool.

      Sure, it's got a fancy plastic handle, and a chuck, and a power cord, but essentially it's just an electric motor that you attach other bits to. Still as useful as ever.
  27. This is Japan by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 0

    Let's have a sense of perspective - this is Japan we're talking about. Smaller gadgets always have more impact on the Japanese market, and that will influence the market for PCs. Not that the overall prediction of PCs becoming less important is wrong, but it's premature to suggest that this is happening outside of Japan.

    1. Re:This is Japan by davebarnes · · Score: 1

      Wasn't Hello Kitty going to conquer the USA? Not every Japanese trend can be extrapolated to the entire world.

      --
      Dave Barnes 9 breweries within walking distance of my house
    2. Re:This is Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. Japan has (and has always had) a space problem. It's a tiny place for a country, with a very small amount of livable land thanks to all the mountains. "Efficiency" style apartments are quite common for them; an upper middle class house is a "mansion" to them; storage space is always at a premium due to the short supply. The result is a "must save space" attitude that permeates every aspect of their lives. A cell phone or PDA fit that bill a whole lot better than a whole PC does.

      Couple that with the Japanese obsession with the bleeding edge in technology, and suddenly the thought of a PC manufacturer ever doing profitable business on a large scale there becomes a miracle.

    3. Re:This is Japan by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Didn't Hello Kitty conquer the USA? Considering all the Hello Kitty stuff you can buy. >^o.o^

  28. You need to lay off the mainframe comparisons by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For one, just because something happened in the past for one technology, doesn't hold that it will happen now for another. Predicting the future by saying the same changes that happened in the past will happen now is no more accurate than predicting the future by saying there will be no change from now.

    However the other thing is, as far as I can tell, the mainframe market is as good as it ever was. Mainframe sales never died, or even waned, there just never have been that many of them. There still are people who buy mainframes, just not a whole lot. It wasn't that the PC supplanted the mainframe, more that it augmented it. We have probably 20,000-30,000 PCs where I work but we still have 2 mainframes and are likely to buy a third.

    So if you wanted to claim that the PC situation will be the same as the mainframe situation, it would be more accurate to say that PCs are going to continue to do just fine, they are just going to be far eclipsed by personal devices like cell phones.

    Also, the article, as they often do, seems to have a body that is different form the headline. The headline would imply that people are ditching their PCs, just using other devices. The body, however, reveals they are just not upgrading them as fast. Ahh, well that's a little different, now isn't it? PC use isn't declining just because sales decline, that just means people aren't buying them as often. This is not highly surprising since, all else aside, you don't need a new PC as bad as you used to.

    I remember when PCs were just universally slow. Just doing normal things they took an amount of time that wasn't acceptable to people. Apps took 30 seconds or more to load, and don't get me started on how long you could have to wait on a print job. As such you always felt like you needed an upgrade. When something faster came out, you wanted it. After all, your current experience sucked, you wanted to make it better. Well that's not the case any more. Even on older hardware, things happen in a reasonable amount of time. It's not as fast as newer hardware, but we are talking the difference between a 1 and 5 second load time and such. There just isn't the feeling that you really need more power all the time.

    That's well and good, and that combined with market saturation (everyone who wishes to have a PC already having one) will lead to slower sales. However it doesn't mean it'll lead to any less usage.

    1. Re:You need to lay off the mainframe comparisons by mrami · · Score: 1
      Those are excellent points!

      Incidentally, if you could, would you please write something similar to boost the morale of the *BSD camps?

      Thx in advance...

    2. Re:You need to lay off the mainframe comparisons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSD needs no morale booster. It is powered by free love, body paint, and dandelion sprouts floating atop the wind...

      Incidentally, netcraft confirmed it back in 1972.

  29. No, not dying by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    The definition of "Personal Computer" is just morphing to fit modern technology.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  30. I agree by Dahlgil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think I agree with the posts saying that PC users are just not upgrading as frequently. Ever since my old VIC-20 days, I've been an avid computer user and have upgraded to a new machine every 2 to 3 years. In fact, 3 years would have been a lot. However, the computer I'm using now is one I built in 2003. Oh my goodness! That's four years ago. I did recently did a multimedia upgrade on it; but this 4 year old machine runs everything from Photoshop CS3 to Oblivion just fine thank you. It even does a decent job on the Crysis demo. Yes, I do have it in my plans to finally build a new machine next year...probably around this time, but that will mean that I've nearly doubled my upgrade interval--and it's not because of money, its simply because the tech is not advancing quite as quickly as it used to relative to the kind of software that I like to run. If someone from the outside was just looking at my credit card records to see my PC buying habits, I'm sure they'd say I must have given up on PCs and moved on to cell phones, DVRs, and console video games--when that would be the furthest thing from the truth. Sure, those other consumer devices are going to cut somewhat into PC sales as well, but that's ok. Personally, I'd like PCs to become a non-mainstream geeky kind of thing again anyway.

    1. Re:I agree by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      Must have swapped out a lot of guts. PCIe, DDR2, (maybe) SLi, beefier PSU, etc. ;)

    2. Re:I agree by Dahlgil · · Score: 1

      My original machine was pretty cutting edge at the time, so I basically maxed out on what my MB could handle, 2.6GHz P4 -> 3.4GHz P4 Extreme (cheap on ebay), an ATI 9800 PRO -> ATI X1950PRO (available in AGP), and an extra 1 GB RAM (total 2GB). Same PSU (450Watt Antec). At 1920x1200 on my 24" flat panel with 4x Anti-aliasing, I can average around 30FPS in Oblivion (and this is in Vista), and everything else I use or play on this machine works well enough to justify pushing out my next expected upgrade almost another year.

    3. Re:I agree by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      Guessed as much, although I think you would have trouble pushing Crysis at 1920x1200 at even medium settings (trouble = maintaining ~30fps). That game eats even an 8800Ultra for lunch :(
      That said, you are missing out on dual/quad-cores (overall system is more responsive) and have a dead-end in terms of graphics upgradability (maybe okay if you're waiting on the overdue refresh from nVIDIA and ATi). What with the dirt cheap prices of DDR2-667 (search around for the $8.95/1GB HP stick deal) and (relatively) sky-high price of DDR1, it might be a worth it for you to switch to say an overclocked E4300/E4500 setup. Dead easy to hit 3GHz with half-decent air cooling.

    4. Re:I agree by Dahlgil · · Score: 1

      You'll get no argument from me that my system is at a "dead-end". That was precisely my point. My point being that reaching this so-called "dead-end" is now about twice as far out as it was in the past. Twenty, or even ten years ago, I would have reached a similar dead-end after about 2 to 3 years. Now I am reaching it in about 4 to 5 years. This change means that my PC buying patterns have changed, thus making it appear to PC sale bean counters that I don't use PCs as much anymore. No. I just don't need to buy them as frequently as before. My intention in six months to a year is to still drop my typical $2000 to $2500 on a new rig using whatever is the the most current tech at that moment. But I can now expect (with a similar mid-life upgrade) that it will last me a very solid 4 to 5 years now. Even with this said, I have to remark that unlike the past, this dead-end is *only* with respect to the very latest games. In the past, after 2.5 years, I could expect that not only would my gaming capabilities be lagging far behind, but even the latest OS and productivity apps would be performing sluggishly. That simply isn't the case anymore. Vista Ultimate performs swimmingly on this machine, as does Photoshop CS3, Lightroom, and nearly every other game that I own.

    5. Re:I agree by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 1

      That's true. Plus even an enthusiast rig isn't all that expensive. Some rough workings :
      ABIT IP35 ($80), C2D E6420 ($190), 4GB DDR2-667 ($40), 8800GT 512MB (~$250), SomeCase (~$50), Corsair HX520W PSU (~$70), SomeHDD~250GB (~$60), SomeBurner (~$30), SB X-Fi XtremeMusic (~$55), 22" LCD ($179), SomeSpeakers (~$100), Logitech G15 / Saitek Eclipse II (~$40), SomeMouse (~$40)
      Grand Total = $1184 for a powerhouse rig (once you OC that E6420).
      Let's save some green : E4500 (-$100), Ultra X-Finity 500W PSU (-$55, these go cheap pretty often and are solid PSUs) = ~$1000.

  31. The PC has been "dying" almost as often by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    as the Mac in the past.

    The iPhone is the king of convergence devices this year (in that it actually works well) but it still could never come close to replacing a PC. I don't think anything ever will - beyond a laptop with a holographic screen and voice input capability - which still is a PC.

    And all these devices like the iPhone do are ultimately do are computerize previously analog-only devices and merge them together. It wasn't too far long ago that the phone was analog only. Same with the camera. Same with a music player (portable CD player previously). The farthest along that it has gone to encroaching on traditional PC turf is browsing or some PDA functions.

    It may change in the future -- but I don't see AI or voice recognition input getting there anytime soon. A necessity for ultimately replacing the laptop or desktop and getting serious work done.

  32. Re:Yeah, well Radio Shack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not stack

  33. Re:cookin up a mug of by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

    Your powers of deduction are teh pwnage young one.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  34. Its just like Vista by night_flyer · · Score: 1

    the average PC user realizes that he doesn't need to upgrade just to be upgrading. doesn't matter if its hardware or software.

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  35. one possible reason... by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Used to be you could only play certain types of games on the PC. They typically required (or benefited from, at least) a fast machine, creating a demand for new hardware purely for the sake of playing the newest games. Now that these types of games are available on consoles, many consumers may have offloaded this "task" which had previously been the domain of PCs onto their consoles. Consequently, they don't have a need to buy new hardware. The PC they bought 2 years ago is still plenty fast to perform all the non-game tasks they bought it for. Web-browsing, email, word processing, manipulating digital pictures, etc.

  36. Yeah Right! Everyone knows the real reason is... by zotz · · Score: 1

    ""The PC's role in Japanese homes is diminishing, as its once-awesome monopoly on processing power is encroached by gadgets such as smart phones that act like pocket-size computers, advanced Internet-connected game consoles, digital video recorders with terabytes of memory NEC's annual PC shipments in Japan shrank 6.2 percent to 2.72 million units in 2006, and the trend is continuing into the first quarter of fiscal 2007 with a 14 percent decline from a year earlier. Sony's PC shipments for Japan shrank 10 percent in 2006 from a year earlier."

    Yeah, right! Everyone knows the real reason is the increasing spread of illegal online PC sharing/downloading by people habituated to piracy by the illegal sharing of music and video! The real thing we need to fear is when people start downloading food online. When you see that starting to happen, run for the hills!

    all the best,

    drew

    http://dangernovel.blogspot.com/
    Danger - A Safe Bahamian Novel
    Being written for NaNoWriMo 2007

    --
    FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
  37. Re:Yeah, well Radio Shack! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fail. Radio stack = tcp/ip stack equivalent for radio.

  38. Re:cookin up a mug of by lord_rob+the+only+on · · Score: 1

    You must be new here. Welcome to Slashdot :-)

  39. Arkansas != non-tech by Yremogtnom · · Score: 2, Informative

    (though I am in basically the Arkansas of Japan, but even when I lived in Osaka, I felt like this was true).

    People in Arkansas are not necessarily low-tech. There's a low cost of living in Arkansas that allows most households to acquire high-tech gadgets and PC's.

    I live in a small town in a economically underdeveloped part of Arkansas, and even here, very few people don't use technology. Almost every household has multiple cell phones and a PC with some sort of internet connection. Granted, there are probably a lot of people in Arkansas that still use dial-up because there's not broadband available, but I'd say a majority of the small towns (populations < 2000) offer cable or dsl internet service.

    Arkansas is also the home of Wal-Mart, which has been selling several brands of PCs since the mid-90's. You also can't find a Wal-Mart without a kiosk that's offering the latest cell phones.

    You might also be surprised at some of the large tech companies based in Arkansas: Acxiom, Alltel (they don't just do wireless service!), and of course, Wal-Mart... these are just a few.

    --
    You are alone in the world.
    1. Re:Arkansas != non-tech by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Forgive his geographical ignorance. If he knew enough about the United States, he would have said 'the Alabama of Japan' but since he didn't he just repeated a common misconception.

    2. Re:Arkansas != non-tech by Yremogtnom · · Score: 1

      Yeah... misconceptions are hard to overcome. Besides, aren't there a lot of smart people in Huntsville, AL? Something about NASA...

      --
      You are alone in the world.
    3. Re:Arkansas != non-tech by that+this+is+not+und · · Score: 1

      Government-funded 'smart people reservations' often do not reflect on the general population of a region.

    4. Re:Arkansas != non-tech by kisielk · · Score: 1

      Funny this should come up. One of my co-workers at the Japanese company where I interned just happened to be from Arkansas, and he's one of the best programmers I know.

  40. The same everywhere by MortenMW · · Score: 0

    I think this tendency is going to appear in the whole western world in not too long. The Japanese are a couple of years ahead of us. Most home-end users does not care about tasks where one would need a PC, most people just want to play games, surf the net and write some mail. And these tasks can be completed on a console or a mobile phone.

  41. The Future by edwardpickman · · Score: 1

    What concerns me as some one that lives and works on PCs, Mac, Linux, PC, is what future availability will be like. Development and production are like fast moving trains right now and they'll take a while to slow down but they almost have to slow down. I see desktop advances slowing in the next three years due to reduced demand. I have a feeling the market will go the way of american society where there will be the rich and the poor and little in between. By that I mean lower powered home PCs that are mostly a motherboard with built in audio and video and possibly many of those features hardwired into the CPU. They'll be smaller and lower power consumption and probably go largely blue tooth cordless so they take little installation. Then you'll have the expensive pro level machine for doing high end business use and graphics. Due to less demand and the expense of development they will likely increase in price and we might eventually go back to the back ole days when workstations cost 20K to 40K each, I hope we don't go back to 200K. There may be a middle ground where gamers and budget minded professional and business users live but gamers may be driven into the consol world and most businesses can live on home level machines. It'll take three to five years to see major changes and probably ten years for new sales models to completely take over but the gold rush of PC develpment is slowing. Without applications that demand speed the consumers won't demand faster machines. Video editing and gaming were the last things driving the market. Now most machines can do basic editing and gaming is shifting to consoles. Middle level graphics people like me will be the ones feeling the pinch. On the brightside machines will be fast enough that instead of half a dozen machines I'll be able to get by on one or two systems but due to expense most may have to go to leasing like many have with cars.

  42. consoles and PCs are trading places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Consoles have taken the worst elements of PCs. Once they got a network, they became half-finished. You're always downloading new firmware, new game updates, and doing dumb shit like web browsing on it.

    PCs are taking the worst elements of consoles. They're becoming locked down, DRMed boxes.

    I don't think I like either direction.

  43. Market saturation != dead market by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

    People are now surrounded by PC's that are "good enough". They will be with us, however, until the display issues and crappy input modes are resolved on mobile platforms. The iPhone may be good, but it doesn't solve either of those issues. When we have virtual keyboards, or some other form of input, half the problem will be solved. When the people working on wearable displays get their technology perfected, then the other half will come into place. At that point, mobiles and PCs will merge.
    Did PDAs die? No, their functionality was taken over by smartphones. The same thing will happen to PCs when the time is right. Until then, you will see slow and steady PC sales, with ups and downs, as people replace their current models at the end of their natural life. I won't upgrade to get a dual core PC until my current laptop dies, or I drop the thing and it breaks.

  44. PCs like automobiles are now a mature market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Could it be that like automobiles, pcs have reached a saturation point? Like automobile sales where once you have one or two in your family you don't need the expense of another one, you only get a replacement when needed?

    I think pcs are like that now. The major growth period for hardware is over. Only when technology makes your current machine too old to run current programs do you need another.

  45. It's not the PC.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think a more important way to look at is that personal computers
    (not "PC" which has come to mean the products of the Wintel hegemony)
    represent the "anything" machine -- a programmable device that users
    can decide the capabilities of, based on what software they buy (or
    write). This is in strong contrast to fixed-purpose devices whose
    features are limited to what the original manufacturers decide to
    dole out to the poor consumer.

    There is an eternal conflict between device makers, who generally want
    to constrain function, and consumers (and their agents: software
    makers), who often have custom desires for equipment they bought.

  46. morphing, changing, not dying-Ball and Chain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So a computer isn't a computer unless it has a big monitor and a large keyboard attached to it?

  47. The name is dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The real issue at hand is not the death of the PC, but the death of the acronym "Personal Computer". There are many examples of the computer integrating into the modern household in new and exciting ways:

    A fridge that can take inventory (what you have and when you need to go back to the supermarket) without you needing to open it. It can also tell you what you can make with what you have.

    A Home Theatre PC (HTPC) connected to your over-sized HDTV, giving you the ability play music, movies, surf the net, play games, record your favourite shows, and countless other tasks.

    I am sure the computer will penetrate many more areas in the home on a larger scale as the architecture gets smaller and more efficient. Computer makers need to understand that it no longer makes sense to sell 50 different models of the same desktop PC.

  48. Re:cookin up a mug of by calebt3 · · Score: 1

    A few months, actually. Long enough to understand/enjoy most of the memes.

  49. Hidden Computers... by Dr.+Zowie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the early 1990s I had the privilege of talking with Don Norman, a psychologist who was a pioneer of computer usability studies (and who later went on to guide development of many products at Apple). Among other things, he opined that there wouldn't be any PCs in about 20-30 years (from then). I was pretty astonished, but he pointed out that in the 1950s-1970s you could buy an electric motor for you kitchen, and they were all the rage. You'd have one installed in your counter, and attach various things to it. By the 1990s you couldn't anymore -- motors were small enough and cheap enough that they were just embedded in any appliance (like a mixer) you might use.

    He asserted that computers were going the same way -- you might end up with dozens of powerful computers in your house, but you wouldn't call them that. You'd call them a "newspad" or a "TV" or a "reader" or whatever. They'd be invisible, with specialized interfaces for whatever task was at hand.

    So far, his prediction appears to be on track.

    1. Re:Hidden Computers... by Loke+the+Dog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's interesting because I've found that modern kitchen appliances often suck. That motor unit with hundreds of attachments could do such an extremely wide variety of stuff, and while the most common stuff has been replaced by specific appliances, there are some things that you cannot do with the modern machines.

      I wonder what things we take for granted now will be next to impossible in the future. All kinds of hardware mods, obviously. Changing OS, probably. Maybe even typing on a keyboard, who needs that when there's gestures and voice commands?

    2. Re:Hidden Computers... by domatic · · Score: 1

      You can still buy the big solid KitchenAid mixers and those getting serious about cooking can still get them or something equivalent. And they do sport a power socket that takes any number of effective attachments.

      I suspect those who stay serious about computing will still be able to buy general purpose machines but they'll be more of a niche item for those know about and need them.

    3. Re:Hidden Computers... by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Not so sure about that. I personally think that computers should have become "invisible" appliances several years ago. The only thing that prevented that was the already widespread use of Windows, especially in the business environment. There were such machines made several years ago that were adequate for doing e-mail and basic web browsing. But because they couldn't read complexly formated e-mail messages or play certain videos and sound files, thanks to the hundreds of variations on how such files are formatted (and encrypted) such devices would only be suitable to a small minority of users.

      Oh it will happen eventually, and the hardware and software vendors love the fact that it will take dozens of more product itterations before consumers begin to settle on anything. But the appliance computer, which I think will end up being a very small (and very inexpensive) laptop type device is beginning to take shape (OLPC and Ausus EEE PC being good first cuts). Devices smaller than that will be find for phones, cameras, and address books, but I've yet to see any keyboard replacement technique that would not discourage me from posting a message even this short on such a tiny device. Until voice recognition is perfected the appliance PC will need a keyboard.

      Yes, TVs have processors in them these days as do dishwashers etc., but we were talking about that when I was in school in the 70's. I don't consider any device with a processor chip a computing device (and certainly not a PC). Let's just say that the "C" in "PC" can stand for either "Communication" or "Computing". A device such as the iPhone (if it were less expensive at the checkout counter and as a monthly bill) would be an excellent example of a "Personal Communications" device. Camera, Phone, Address book, short text messages, etc, all covered adequately. But I don't think I'd do my taxes on it, or write a book, and unless they sold for $9 I wouldn't want to think about how in a years time it wouldn't hold a charge as long as when it was new. In fact I'm getting pretty bloody tired of all the rechargeable devices I have already, they actually make special pieces of furniture now to hold such devices, it has gotten ridiculous.

      PC as in "Personal Computing" though will always be a superset of the other type of thing. If a camera, phone, text messaging software, etc. is as cheap as it SHOULD be to put in a portable device (of which you should only need ONE) then you might as well tack it on to your laptop type device as well. Get rid of the moving parts, optimize power consumption on the display and these things can run for house on battery, but will MOSTLY be used while plugged in, and I THINK, should be able to draw power from multiple sources from telephone cables, USB plugs, or wall wart, basically whatever you happen to be closest to.

      Really, once we get to the point where we don't need the latest Intel or AMD processor to do basic stuff (a point I maintained we reached quite a few years ago) all of this is doable.

      As a consumer, I'll continue pinching my pennies, even though I don't always need to. My hope is that the eventually something like a Google phone will blow the bottom out of that market, and the Asus EEE PC once it hits the stores is probably going to replace my laptop (I'm still skeptical about the size of the keyboard on that though).

  50. Technology plateau by grumling · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems to me that we have hit a technological plateau recently. This happens from time to time, when current designs have been played out. It happened with radio in the 1920s (broken by the superhetrodyne circuit), again in the 50s (broken by the transistor), then in the late 1960s and 70s (finally adopting FM over AM). In the wake of the innovation, many companies went out of business or had to go through massive changes.

    The PC industry plateaued in the 1970s (miniframes and hobby computers), 1980s (death of 8-bit computers), 1990s (death of 8088 based PCs and 68000 series Macs), and we'll soon happen again, likely marked as the end of the Intel age. This is normal as technology doesn't develop in nice, easy to manage chunks. Moore's law just says that transistors will double every 18 months, not that everyone will have a use for all of them.

    The growth in the market these days seems to be in microcontrollers, using designs that are becoming just as powerful as a PC without the OS tax. It is interesting to note that the trend is following the same software curve as before: authoring in assembler, migrating to simple microcode languages, stripped down OS (tiny Linux), custom OS (like Windows mobile smartphones and OS X on the iPhone). I wonder if the people writing the OS for these devices will realize that at one time Windows and DOS would fit on a few floppies.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
    1. Re:Technology plateau by Cal+Paterson · · Score: 1

      The PC industry plateaued in the 1970s (miniframes and hobby computers), 1980s (death of 8-bit computers), 1990s (death of 8088 based PCs and 68000 series Macs), and we'll soon happen again, likely marked as the end of the Intel age. This is normal as technology doesn't develop in nice, easy to manage chunks. Moore's law just says that transistors will double every 18 months, not that everyone will have a use for all of them.
      I can't tell if you are confused about the defintion of plateau, or the definition of PC. Perhaps both.
    2. Re:Technology plateau by master_p · · Score: 1

      "likely marked as the end of the Intel age"

      Oh no! not before Duke Nukem Forever is released...

  51. Perhaps people are coming to their senses... by keithjr · · Score: 1

    ...and realizing their PC has been "fast enough" to do basic operations like word processing, media management, web browsing, etc. This all, despite the OS makers adding needless feature after needless feature to slow down their product and make upgrading hardware more attractive.

    Overall, whether or not the PC market slows down is fairly irrelevant. Personal computers are an integral and ubiquitous part of our everyday lives and won't magically disappear just because of a market fluctuation. The PC manufacturers like Dell and HP will just have to realize they need to provide more effective long-term service and change their marketing model, instead of hammering out system after system.

  52. What's next? by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

    How about:
    "The dying Car market" we all know that it doesn't increase in sales...
    "The dying candy market"

    A year without growth doesn't mean anthing... Everyone isn't buying a new computer every year...

  53. People have computers, and don't need another. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    Quote from the Slashdot article: "The PC's role in Japanese homes is diminishing..."

    It's sad that, after all these years, Slashdot editors have not learned to be editors.

    Actually, the computers most people have are adequate for what they do. They don't need another computer. That's why manufacturers are selling fewer computers, not because "The PC's role is diminishing..."

    1. Re:People have computers, and don't need another. by chocbar31 · · Score: 0

      Not to mention...I can't stack computers in the closet of my apartment, as I stack my shoes...they don't fit. I'm already budgeting getting rid of some of the boxes I have stored. Why should I go by another computer when I already have five boxes and three laptops? Doesn't make since to continue buying a new computer every year. Unless they can create a cheeeeeeep disposable PC. Speaking for myself...can't fill-up every square inch of my living quarters with older PCs. That space is needed for living. My Dell Inspiron 9100 is 4 years old now, and still runs faster than half the PC's produced today. No need to replace this. It plays the latest games, and runs every-other piece of software I need for work and classes I am enrolled in. I would rather see them collaborating on bandwidth rather than new computers. Working where I work, on a domain, it is proven over-and-over that computers run faster when on a computer network that has adequate network bandwidth.

      --
      This site is like CRACK; hooked on the first use!!!
  54. On a Limb; Consumption and Population Growth by claygate · · Score: 1

    http://www.stat.go.jp/English/data/handbook/c02cont.htm In 2005 this shows a growth rate of -0.01% and no growth in 2006. Added to the fact that the population is aging and adults already own functioning computers the decline of the PC market seems a little fallacious. How are the PC markets of developing nations doing? What about 20 or 30 years down the line when, hopefully, the economies of the markets OLPC have targeted mature and need to stock offices, homes and schools with PCs? Unless PCs are gone by then or are replaced by tablet-esque learning and business PCs then I think the computer industry can sleep quite calmly.

  55. Japan's future by BobandMax · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    What is not bright is Japan's future. Their declining birth rate, unfavorable demographic trends and extremely racist attitudes that discourage immigration combine to assure that their society will decline steadily. Unless Japan can increase the birth rate, they will diminish.

    --

    "Computers are useless. They can only give you answers."
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Japan's future by damaki · · Score: 1

      That's where tentacle rape comes in. Let's mate with strange looking monsters!

      --
      Stupidity is the root of all evil.
    2. Re:Japan's future by jma05 · · Score: 1

      > Unless Japan can increase the birth rate, they will diminish.

      You are only looking at the growth rates (or the lack of). The actual numbers tell a different story. Japan still has 10 times the population density than US and ranks 23 overall and still has over-crowded cities. They import a lot of their food. Coming from a similarly over-populated country, I would see that as progress with them moving to a number more reasonable for their land to support. Granted, it will effect the economy negatively for a while.

  56. Heres my theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe most PC's are powerful enough and people figured out there is no reason to buy a new one every year? Heck mine is 6 years old and I see no reason to get a new one in the foreseeable future. My biggest problem is the lack of avaliability of new technology for old interfaces such as IDE and AGP. At least they make IDE SATA adaptors its unlikely the major GPU card manufacturers will continue to place new AGP releases on the market.

  57. The only barrier is your mind by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Informative
    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  58. John Gage was right... by Serious+Poo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...when he said that "The Network is the Computer" back in 1984. People mainly need an inexpensive & fun way to connect to the Internet, and with Internet-enabled phones, PDA's, and handheld devices becoming more ubiquitous, it would make sense that PC sales might slump. That doesn't mean that PC's are going away any time soon, it just indicates that the PC market is reaching maturity and saturation.

    --
    "There is nothing more unequal than the equal treatment of unequal people." - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:John Gage was right... by Simple-Simmian · · Score: 1

      Many fold problems with that. My Cellphone carrier charges to much money, it's slow, the display is dinky, input method stinks. I'll stay with my keyboard, mouse, 20 inch display and, 10X1Mbt connection.

      --
      If you don't like what I write don't be a CS and mod it down. Refute it.
      Yea I can't spell. So what is your point?
  59. The only difference... by MonoSynth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is that a motor can be made as small as technology allows, but a screen and some sort of input device just have to be of a certain size to be comfortable for your eyes and hands.

    I think a lot of functionality will eventually end up in smaller devices, but there will always be a number of apps that still need a pc-like device. Like browsing the web, managing music, videos and photo's, typing a document and making a presentation.

    Separate devices for each and every app are a waste of money and space.

    1. Re:The only difference... by WhoBeDaPlaya · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for neural implants. Then we can finally do away with tiny-a*s screens and input devices.
      But God forbid that we should get g0atse or tubg*rl transmitted right into our brains *shudders*

    2. Re:The only difference... by mean+pun · · Score: 1

      Separate devices for each and every app are a waste of money and space.

      Not to mention very inflexible. One of the reasons computers are so useful is that you can create your own workflow by running different applications.

      Nevertheless, the trend is towards flatter, lighter, and cheaper screens. One of these days Apple is going to strech an iPod touch to a 15" screen, and people will have an ultra-flat PC, or a PDA, or a tablet, or an intelligent screen, or a book reader, or a smart TV, or whatever they want to call it.

    3. Re:The only difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...is that a motor can be made as small as technology allows, but a screen and some sort of input device just have to be of a certain size to be comfortable for your eyes and hands.

      Yes, but most people will have a TV, which will have a reasonable sized display, and that will be connected to a DVR, which is essentially a computer already, just attach a keyboard for input and there you go. Most people will probably use that and not think of it as a PC.

    4. Re:The only difference... by MonoSynth · · Score: 2, Informative

      just attach a keyboard for input And a mouse and a desk and a decent chair and a different atmosphere than the atmosphere of a living-room.
  60. Mobile phone for browsing? by gravyface · · Score: 1

    Come on. In a pinch, yeah, I'm glad I can surf on my Blackberry but there's no way a smart phone is going to supersede a computer for browsing the Web.

    --
    body massage!
    1. Re:Mobile phone for browsing? by rtyhurst · · Score: 1

      Can you see goatse on a mobile phone?

      Of course you can!

      The PC is dead!

  61. xbox by mscamara · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I knew from the begining that this was the reason MS got into game consoles. They probably told themselves that they should hedge their bets in case another device than the PC gets more popular in homes. Their rational might have been: We stay aside, and sony and/or nitento might win this a make a ton of money; the pc being a mature market with limited growth, or consoles geting so powerful that they can just accomplish well enough most domestic computing tasks... Or, we can get involved. Best case scenario: we will make some money, or at least break even. we will leverage our expertise in game and framework designing to port and creat new games for the xbox... worst case, we slow down sony by vigourously competing with them. Nitendo being less and less relevent each day (mind you this is before the wii) We cannot afford to leave this market to sony only. If all we do is lose money on the project, it'll be considered as insurance for protecting our cash cow windows from an emerging competitor: sony..

  62. nah..he was right... by OneInEveryCrowd · · Score: 1

    The reason I'm not more gadget-oriented is because of telco behavior amoung other things. I'd really like to stop lugging the laptop around everywhere, I just feel all the current product and service offerings here in San Jose are rip-offs.

  63. No problem whatsoever by Sperbels · · Score: 1

    Less PCs out there means less people learning to code means less competition for my job. Maybe I can stop working 10 hours days to keep ahead of the other guy.

  64. PC/Vista sales are fine, Japan is problem by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Their projections to Wall Street probably included a spike that hasn't happened.

    Actually the US PC industry has been kicking as with respect to wall street expectations.

    Microsoft beat expectations, including very good Vista sales, and broke through a five year ceiling of $30 and climbed to $37 last week after announcing earnings.

    For the last three years HP has had a steady climb from $20 to $50. Analysts love their PC business.

    For the last year and a half Intel has climbed from $17 to $27 as the Core architecture plugged the hole created by the Pentium 4 and that had let AMD gain market share. Analysts are in love with Intel again.

    Dell is crawling out of a hole it fell into last years, analysts are starting to show interest in them again.

    The problem is the Japanese economy. Last week they announced that unemployment had gotten worse. Sales are nearly flat year over year, industrial output down, exports to the US are down, exports to China are slowing, etc. Toyota stock has been going downhill all year, $138 to #113.

    1. Re:PC/Vista sales are fine, Japan is problem by abell · · Score: 3, Interesting

      When considering stock variation expressed in US dollars, you should also factor in how much the dollar has lost compared to the other currencies. This graph, for instance, show that the devaluation has eaten up all the gains in MSFT stock, using the Euro as a reference.

    2. Re:PC/Vista sales are fine, Japan is problem by kvee119 · · Score: 1

      Wrong! Keep in mind the article is talking about PC sales - not including Laptop sales. All the examples you used includes everything in addition to PC sales.

  65. Japan as market indicator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The market of a single nation shouldn't be considered a global indicator, especially when we know that nations population is also shrinking.

  66. Well said - Saturated and Stagnant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Correct - computers aren't advancing by leaps and bounds as they used to. 10 years ago, processor speed and capability doubled every year or 2. How many years now have we been stuck in the 3 to 4GHz speed?

    Also, I think the Windows interface, as a concept, has done all it can. We started with the DOS text interface, and anything up to a 286 handled that just fine. With graphical windows - you can add semitransparent windows, toolbars, right-click context menus, etc - but the basic OS interface is pretty fixed; and the computer has the power to handle it. The impetus with the run up from Win3.11 to 95, 98, XP, etc. was that the computer did not have the horsepower to meet the demand of the interface. (Remember screen redraws that could be a significant fraction of a minute? Especially AutoCad or print previews?) Now, computers breeze through that stuff.

    I'm not sure what the next step will be. Voice interface? Context guessing (like Google tries to do)? 3D holographic? Virtual reality? Whatever it will be, that will probably be the driver for the next big advance in computers.

    I used to think - the average Joe doesn't need a home computer. An embedded browser device that allows you to check your mail, compose simple office documents, and surf the web and read your email - that's all they need. However, the economics is such that there is no major cost savings in an appliance - the screen and keyboard are probably so much of the cost, that a crippled processor doesn't save you much. (Except maybe the OEM cost of Windows?) I suppose using the gaming console as the internet appliance bypasses that flaw in the argument. You buy something you need anyway, and it comes with whatever AJ would buy a computer for...

    I think the computer of the future will "devolve". The focus will shift from the device and OS to the standards. The USB drive is a prime example. The standard "storage media" simply plugs into the standard interface. Watch for the same to happen with Ethernet. (It's pretty well there; think Apple Airport, NAS storage). Yourscreen device becomes a simple terminal - browser, basic appliance. your storage is a disk or several on your home network. Your printer, your camera, your scanner, your TV/PVR, speaker system, etc. If you have to do serious processing, you buy a server or 2 and plug them into the network.

    All these devices are controlled via standard interfaces. We don't care what each embedded OS is, as long as we can do what we want with Web, Java, remote terminal protocols, streaming or whatever. Files are defined by the standard with which they are written - txt, jpg, mpg, mp3, xls, oo, avi, doc, pdf. ...And Bill Gates' worst nightmare comes true, and he's out of a job. Partly it's his own fault. He wanted IE to be so integral to the OS that he convinced us that we should look at directories and file contents as web information inside browsers instead of using dedicated programs. Why not? Good idea. Then it's each source device's job to serve / present it's limited repertoire of information in a standard format, instead of leaving it all up to a central processor.

    1. Re:Well said - Saturated and Stagnant by tacocat · · Score: 1

      I think I've already arrived at some of what you describe. I have only notebooks for my interface. Each person in the house has one notebook. Everything is wireless. Printers are running in the basement off a small server. I also have email, web, database, and file servers but I'm about the only real user on any of them since I'm the guy who plays the most. Big projects are written on the notebook and tested on the servers.

    2. Re:Well said - Saturated and Stagnant by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Correct - computers aren't advancing by leaps and bounds as they used to. 10 years ago, processor speed and capability doubled every year or 2. How many years now have we been stuck in the 3 to 4GHz speed?

      Several. But now we're getting 2 and 4 CPU cores and much more efficient implementations at similar clockspeeds.

      Rest assured that "computing power" is increasing just as fast as it ever was. Today, for the same price (if not less), we buy servers with 4x as many CPU cores and 4x as much RAM than a couple of years ago.

    3. Re:Well said - Saturated and Stagnant by tacocat · · Score: 1

      Right, computing power is increasing. But consumer command for that increase is not. Effective saturation.

  67. XBOX 360 by ThirdPrize · · Score: 1

    Tell that to M$. On the 360s system blade, the tab you use for clearing out your hard disk is called Memory.

    --
    I have excellent Karma and I am not afraid to Troll it.
  68. Oh come on, people! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One country reporting a 6.2% drop in sales hardly warrants a sweeping declaration of a "dying PC market". Cell phones sound great; now, how many people here are posting to Slashdot using one? Anybody? If you are, won't the eyestrain and finger-cramp eventually get to be annoying?

  69. Blame fileplanet and hardocp (shacknews) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and advertising incentives which encouraged websites to steer their users towards consoles. Dirty companies destroying an industry while trying to make a fast buck (the irony is they used hardware and game developers own products to kill the industry. It's too late now, momentum is lost (along with some pretty useful spin-offs)).

    An utter and complete disconnection to their consumers the way only a woman and falsified statistics can. I simply got tired of fighting with copy-protection, looking for a patch, mod or hacked exe from websites that treat me like a criminal. Use to spend 200-300 a year on games and 1000 on a new system or upgrades every few years. Now, a hard-drive every five years pretty much does it.

    No intention of returning, the hobby was replaced by another whose consumer driven market places me first. Gone gone gone.

  70. mac sales down too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mac sales are down there too.

  71. Blame it on Daylight Savings Time :) by davidwr · · Score: 1

    It's Fall Back, right? I set my calendar back a century.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  72. Re:cookin up a mug of by Cecil · · Score: 4, Informative

    The lameness filter used to refuse to allow a post with only the text "First Post". So the various misspellings and abbreviations were born to get around it.

  73. I did it and I'm not sorry by fyoder · · Score: 1

    Sony's PC shipments for Japan shrank 10 percent in 2006 from a year earlier.

    Clearly my boycott Sony campaign is achieving results. I go on and on mercilessly to people about how they shouldn't buy Sony because of their rootkit sheanigans and their belonging to an organization that sues children and the disabled. Clearly this has somehow made it to Japan and is making a difference, at least amongst non-slashdot readers. With slashdot one day it's 'boo, Sony, for doing bad things', but next day it's 'Hooray, Sony has released a shiny new toy' (or movie or some other goody). I don't give me that line about how Sony is divided into different departments and we shouldn't penalize one section for the misdeeds of another. At the end of the day when the money is counted it's all Sony profit. Which is why the premise of the article is no big deal to Sony; if one part of their empire loses to another part of their empire, overall they haven't lost at all.

    --
    Loose lips lose spit.
  74. The PC is dead, long live the new PC! by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

    The PC has evolved over the years, the old definition of what a PC was is dead, there is a new definition of a PC in modern times that is very much alive.

    #1 The Intel Mac is one of the new PC definitions as it uses PC technology now.

    #2 The new Amiga standard will be based on PC technology as well.

    #3 The new PC need not even run Windows, it can run Linux, *BSD Unix, or any other OS that runs on it.

    #4 The PC is the new Hackintosh with the OSX X86 Project to run OSX on PC systems.

    #5 The Xbox 360, Playstation 3, and Wii all use PC technology and are basically PCs by themselves if you add a keyboard and mouse to them.

    #6 The iPhone and most modern cell phones are now like a PC anyway.

    #7 PDAs and hand held computers are basically PCs now anyway.

    #8 PCs can run emulators to run software for all different sorts of computer platforms and game consoles.

    #9 PCs are used to develop software for many computer platforms.

    #10 PCs can be used as dumb terminals or remote control access for any computer system.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  75. H.264 and the failed promise of pc as media center by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    When H.264 hit "main stream" back in '05 i was compelled to upgrade my old system.

    for people who actually use their computers as media hubs (read ME), the demand is still there for upgrades.

    unfortunately the dinosaurs of media have made this natural evolution of the PC into the home legally (and are trying to make it socially) hostile.

    by complying with and attempting to take advantage of the anti-competitive nature of DRM protection laws rather than lobbying against them, the pc industry is reaping what they sow.

    they towed the party line instead of standing up like the CE groups did in the betamax case, and now not only are most tools to get media working on your pc illegal, but their lack of support for such activity have led to media blitzes which have embedded the idea in "sheeple" that such activity is equivalent to "theft".

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  76. technology by Montusama · · Score: 1

    Technology in Japan is expanding, from what I read a few months ago here about cellphones in Japan and Europe compared to the United States, Japan uses "mobile email" and also their phones have internet and tv (wish I had one of those). I'm assuming this was mostly targeted for desktop's but I haven't seen many "appealing" desktops from Japan (especially NEC and SONY). I don't think it included Laptops or UMPC/Tablet's which are probably on the rise for their small size. I'm not sure if Japan has "DVR" like the US or even "On Demand" channels but I'm fairly certain that Japan's HDTV market is very large, since even more programming is digital in Japan.

    Now ask yourself this...Would you rather have a desktop, a laptop a tablet pc or a UMPC?
    I would honestly rather have a laptop or even a tablet (a UMPC is possible depending on what it is) In the United States this hasn't happen yet because their's still a large pool of people who don't even own computers. Though I'm fairly certain here laptops are on the rise while desktops are slowing down.

    Life in Japan I don't know how its like exactly but pretty sure most people only go home to sleep so having a desktop there isn't really important.
    You're a student? A laptop will do that job well and pretty sure even some of their smartphones they got will be able to do some things that a laptop can do.
    You're a Professional? Chances are you only use a desktop at work because thats' where all your information is, plus a laptop for mobile work, a smartphone can do email and such but it can't do everything.

    Here is the big one
    Gadget lovers....we like stuff to be "all-in-one" (main reason why I still haven't gotten a cellphone) and sure Japanese people are like that

    *wonders if I went off a bit...*

    --
    God Of War ^^
  77. Re:H.264 and the failed promise of pc as media cen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wish I could mod you up

  78. It is happening outside of Japan by tknd · · Score: 1

    From Forbes:

    Last month Asus' Eee PCs hit store shelves in Taiwan, and Shih may have his breakthrough. The two-pound laptops starting at $340 sold out in 30 minutes, and buyers around the globe clamored to get their hands on them. This month they arrive in the U.S.--starting at $300--and Europe. The rollout will probably reach China early next year, with the schedule for the rest of Asia not yet set. The day they went on sale, Asustek's stock rose 4.9%. Kirk Yang, who heads Asia technology hardware research for Citigroup in Hong Kong, predicts that the company will sell at least 3 million Eee PCs next year but could easily tally 6 million. By comparison, Apple has sold 4.3 million laptops in the last four quarters. Analysts say the Eee PC will probably have the low-end market to itself for 18 months before the other big PC makers can jump in.

    The Forbes article is slightly off in regards to the US price (it is actually $399.99 in the US), but there's some pretty obvious demand. At first glance the eee PC seems like a small underpowered laptop. However, the hardware is plenty to do the most common PC functions like reading emails, browsing the internet, and watching videos.

    I do not think the PC market is going to diminish, but that it will change. There will be more ultra-portable devices like the eee or iphone to replace common functions of a PC. In the near future I see the desktop PC as a tool for demanding applications, but not for general home use. For example, my parents (we live in California) love it when their computer gets smaller because they only use it to write documents, check email, and browse the internet. There's no longer a need for a PC to take up as much space as it has in the past.

  79. I blogged about it... The State of Home Computers by Lexor · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Japanese don't get it. After all, they actually embraced Microsoft's MSX platform ;) http://grog.ca/index.php?m=11&y=07&entry=entry071104-155949

    --
    Regards, Lex
  80. Calculation error? by Krozy · · Score: 2, Informative

    If prepaid runs less then $.01/min, then shouldn't you be able to get 450 minutes a month for less then $4.50, as opposed to the $8 you stated?

    --
    There are 10 types of cliches in this world. Those that are new, and those that aren't.
    1. Re:Calculation error? by jamar0303 · · Score: 1

      You get reduced international rates in the package too (since it's primarily aimed at businesspeople)- $.02/min to North America and Singapore (why Singapore?), $.10/min to the rest of Asia, and I forgot for Europe. So good if you make a lot of international and domestic calls.

      --
      OSx86 FTW
  81. Re:cookin up a mug of by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    But apparently not all of them. Therefore, taking into account your incomplete mastery of the syllabus, the verdict of the panel is henceforth promulgated: in Soviet Russia it fails YOU!!!!

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  82. The Dominance it HAD??? by kklein · · Score: 3, Informative

    Okay, I've lived here in Japan off and on since 1998, and I've got a problem with this article.

    The PC has never been big here. I teach university, and, seriously, I have kids who have never used a computer. Never. Not at home; not at school. I have to teach them how to open and close windows. How to click. How to type in Japanese (for whatever bizarre reason, no one uses the Japanese kana keyboard--they type in Roman characters and the computer changes them to kana, so they usually have to type 2 characters to get one).

    When I first came in 1998 as a university student, the other foreign exchange students and I were mortified when we asked the university where we could connect to the internet so we could email our families to tell them we'd arrived, only to be told "Internet? We don't have that." A university with something like 15,000 students. With no internet.

    "What," we asked, "you mean, not in the foreign exchange building? That's fine, we can go over to the library..."

    "No, sorry. Not there either."

    "Well, what about the professors? They have it don't they?"

    "Some do, yes. But please don't bother them."

    Finally, enough of us whined enough that they wired up two ancient Macs in the commons area. The students self-organized a waiting list to use them. They were horribly slow. The entire campus shared a single ISDN line. I gave up and just started dialing into the modem pool at my US university to quickly upload/download mail via the line-in on a pay phone.

    What was the killer app that made the PC a must-have for most of the developed world? Internet, right? Well, most people in Japan had the internet on their cellphones (keitais) long before they had it at home. As a result, if you ask someone to mail you, the first thing they're going to do is tap out a message on their keitai.

    But there's more to it. Of course email was the killer app for the internet in the rest of the world, but another was online shopping (in the case of the US, anyway). This has not taken off in Japan so much either. Why? Well, and this is just my new pet theory, a few days old, there is a cultural difference at play.

    In the US, many of us are descendants of homesteaders and other people living in the middle of nowhere. You went to town once a month, if you had one. JC Penney, Sears, etc. were all originally what kind of company? Mail-order. You ordered your stuff via post, and then they arrived on the train. Next time you were in town, you picked it up. We have a strong mail-order cultural meme. Not so in Japan, which has basically always been urban, because most of Japan is uninhabitable (like 45-degree angles--beautiful mountains, but not so good for living on). Everyone lived and lives in the little strips of flattish land between the oceans and the mountains. So there is a strong culture of going to the shops (run by people you know) to get stuff. People--older people, especially--are very uncomfortable with ordering things they haven't seen.

    Playing into the above problem is another: no customer rights. Return policies are usually not clearly stated. If you want to return something, you need to beg and convince a manager you deserve it. Worse still, the credit card is not the great deal it is in the rest of the world. In Western countries, you put purchases on a credit line with a credit card. Here, you have to pay it off at a rate you specify when you make the purchase. You don't know what bill any purchase is going to show up on, and the bill is direct-debit. Furthermore, the banks offer none of the protections we take for granted. If your card gets stolen or a database hacked, guess who pays? You. You're totally responsible for everything that happens with that card, even if it has nothing to do with you. So people don't really like using them. Personally, I try to use my US card as much as possible, because of the protections it affords.

    Also, space constraints. The only thing that

    1. Re:The Dominance it HAD??? by captainwisdom · · Score: 1

      Very eye-opening your experience in Japan. Seems like I remember many 'experts' going on and on in the early 90's about the dominance of the Japan economics model. Hogwash I thought at the time and I think that now. This credit-card stuff you commented on is just another example of the greatness of the American model. As usual, I don't think Americans appreciate this enough as I see endless griping on this site. I, for one, am glad I live here.

    2. Re:The Dominance it HAD??? by News+for+nerds · · Score: 1

      How long have you been living in Japan exactly? Your description sounds pretty dated, almost like 10 years ago. Have you heard about companies such as Rakuten? Amazon is pretty big in Japan too. Even elementary school students are blogging today.

    3. Re:The Dominance it HAD??? by siliC · · Score: 1

      I agree, at some level, with a lot of the things in your post. But:

      >>Everyone seems to think Japan is this super techno-wonderland. It's not. Not in the way that Westerners assume it is. My toilet washes my butt and my water heater can also fill my tub to a precise depth and temperature and tell me when it's ready. But internet access is a major hassle to set up (see some of my other posts), PC components are so expensive sometimes that I get them cheaper by ordering from the US and paying the international shipping, keitai contracts are even more limited and abusive than the US, and houses aren't heated. In so many ways, Japan is so, so far behind even countries like Korea.

      Hmm... at one level, i must agree. Ibaraki-ken, for instance, is not super techno-wonderland. But Tokyo? (and i think Tokyo is what people outside of Japan often mean by "Japan")

      I have 100mbit internet to my apartment. I can use the net at a random train station, via wireless to my PSP. And my work is related to more internet bandwidth that most people have seen in their lifetime, combined. (yes, including porn torrents) (more specifically, Tokyo and Osaka combine to form one of, if not singularly, the largest peering points in Eastern Asia)

      And that's just super techno-wonderland related to internet... how about all the daily magic that makes Tokyo work? Akiba?

      I dunno... sating my technolust is among the top reasons i live here.

    4. Re:The Dominance it HAD??? by kklein · · Score: 1

      ...Well, I did say the uni story was from 1998. So yeah, that's 10 years ago. It was meant as a point of reference. I came from Colorado to the heart of Osaka and found worse net connectivity in the latter!

      The bit about the students I have now, at an expensive private university, who haven't actually used a computer before? That part would be now. As in, this year. I have started scheduling at least one lesson at the beginning of the school year just to get some of the incoming students feeling comfortable with the PC. Of course, there is a lot of peer-teaching going on there, but can you imagine an 18-year-old North American or European having never used a computer before? I'm in my late-early-thirties (not that I'm counting, mind you!), and I had my first computer lessons in kindergarten. In the middle of nowhere. A town of 12,000. Surrounded by cows and corn for many, many miles.

      Ultimately, my point is that there is not the kind of life-level penetration that one sees in the US. If there are elementary students blogging, they are doing more than my students, and certainly more than my wife. My point is that Japan is behind, not ahead. Looking at my 60-something parents, who have been online since 1996, do a lot of their business over the net, and who read their friends' blogs, it's clear the the PC and the internet are really a part of the economic and social fabric of everyday people's lives in the US. They're not computer people (far from it--oh, so very, very, very far); they're just people. Run around and try to find 60-somethings here who can say the same.

      Of course I've heard of Rakuten--they have eaten every good website. But try hitting them with your keitai. They load mobile versions. That's not a complaint; that's pointing out that the keitai is where they are expecting to get enough business to warrant doing a whole other website. Hell, the web-based course management software my university uses even has mobile versions.

      True, I see a lot of Amazon deliveries... to foreigners. Of course it can't only be us, but seriously, I've never seen an Amazon box in the trash of anyone but foreigners' houses. Just sayin'.

      Perhaps I over-argued my point, but that is at least partly intentional: Stories about Japan in the foreign press oftentimes hinge on a few myths about Japan. They are very flattering myths, so Japan is in no hurry to expose them as such, but they are myths nonetheless.

      I like living here. I've been living here off and on for almost 10 years (about 6 on, in 3 different periods). But it is not like people expect. My officemate is leaving after one year at our university largely because she finds living here extremely difficult. She was expecting techno-wonderland. She got Japan.

    5. Re:The Dominance it HAD??? by kklein · · Score: 1

      Fair enough; you work in IT. I don't (anymore). I'm looking at middle and upper-middle-class kids who have never used a computer before. I'm looking at net speeds of 3Mb at my apartment and being unable to get fiber because no one else in the area is interested. I'm looking at computer stores that carry less than a typical Best Buy. And I'm looking at cellphones taking up half of the floorspace of most electronics stores.

      And I'm in Makuhari, with BMW, IBM, Canon, SEI, Sumitomo, etc. all within a 10-minute bike ride away.

      Akiba. I don't even bother going there anymore because it's the same products as I can get around here for the same prices, only with more creepy cosplay kids. About the only time I go is when I need something from Tsukumo.ex, because their online order system is nigh useless.

      And finally, as someone who's lived in rural Japan (where my wife is from) for a few years, I have to take issue with defining Japan by Tokyo. Yes, that's what most people have in mind when they talk about Japan, but that's not Japan. That's Tokyo. I mean, you could say "the US has ubiquitous and affordable public transportation" if you narrowed your definition of the entire country to New York City. But the truth is far to the contrary. Same thing here.

  83. Utter Nonsense by Cafe+Alpha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Until you can download porn on the PS3, the PC's popularity is insured.

    1. Re:Utter Nonsense by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      1. Use the built in PS3 web browser or install Linux on the PS3 (or PS2 for that matter)

      2. Download pr0n with PS3 browser or whatever Linux browser/tool you want.

  84. As it should be!! by AllenNg · · Score: 1

    Now, the PC can get back to what it really is: a Personal Computer. For the past several years, I've whined that PC development was being misdirected and bogged down by its mainstream attention. It's difficult to expect capitalism to produce OS's, applications, and technologies for a small crowd of engineers, techies, and geeks when there are masses of consumers out there willing to shell out tons of money for half-baked, inflated, useless garbage. "Your customers tell you what business you're in" and for the past several years, the PC industry has been in the business of "protecting" the user from their computers instead of "empowering" the user with their computers. This specialization of computing power is a very good thing and it's win/win. The masses of consumers get the features and applications they were looking for in the first place without dragging down a sophisticated, technical tool to be accessible to the lowest common denominator.

  85. Most Linux systems are embedded devices by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    Millions of smartphones etc run Linux. Way more than the laptops and servers combined.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  86. Currency wise, thats a poor increase. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So the US dollar has fallen 30%, but your shares have risen 10-20%? (except intel) A lot of their increased profits are due to international sales currency conversion, and nothing to do with 30% increase in sales, more like flat sales.

    Japan has exported its inflation by lending out trillions at less than one percent.

    When you increase your currency circulation (ie numbers in spreadsheets) by 15 - 20% yearly, eventually something is going to crack, its like legalized mass counterfeiting.

    This money hasnt come from wealth generation, just a print button set to 1000000000000 copies.

  87. Japanese computers not really used for gaming by patio11 · · Score: 1

    You'd have to search high and low here to find a PC gaming culture, outside from MMORPGs at Internet cafes, maybe two titles from Koei (historical sims), and a whole mess of games which the US ratings board could probably safely ban based on the cover art alone. The gaming culture here is primarily console based. There are a couple of reasons for this: really lackluster effort by foreign publishers to translate games into Japanese (you can *get* Starcraft in Japan, but I hope you like playing with an English interface and a handy Japanese manual that says "This button is what you press when you want to start a new campaign"), a chicken-egg scenario with Japanese publishers, and just a general impression that the computer is a tool for word processing while the Nintendo is a tool for fun.

    Thus, why would you need to upgrade to a new PC every 3 years? The old one still runs Word, browses the Internet, and sends mail. Why blow $700 on a new laptop when the same amount of money gets you a Wii and a year's worth of games or almost enough hardware to boot up a single PS3 disk?

  88. in soviet russia...well, south korea at least... by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

    I have never been to Japan, so I can not speak about their culture from experience, but I imagne it is similar to South Korea.

              In South Korea, an average family home is a small one room apartment where people go to sleep. people don't do anything in their homes. everythng happens outside. I run into students at 11 at night who are still in their uniforms, because they haven't gone home. when they want to play games, they go to a PC bang (PC)to play their games. when they want to watch a DVD, they go to a DVD bang, when they want to check email, they use thier cellphones, which are a year ahead of what we get in North America.

    there is simply no place for the desktop PC in their culture. even the laptops they have here are tiny. mini laptops with 5-7 inch screens are extreamly common. their laptops are about the same size as my first motorola brickphone!

    PCs are not dead here, they are just imbedded into smaller devices that fit into their culture better. they dont have the big western homes where we go -and stay, when the work day is done.

    --
    -I only code in BASIC.-
  89. Not really the case for the Wii by Rob+Simpson · · Score: 1

    The worst part - game updates allowing half-finished games to be released - isn't gonna happen without a hard drive. And the web browser, while gimmicky, is an optional download.

    Oh, and some Wiis are locked down, but not the modchipped ones. ;)

  90. Re:cookin up a mug of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not a meme dipshit

  91. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. Databases are another prime example. I don't care what the database is, as long as it takes a standard query (SQL) via a standard interface (ODBC). A SQL server (generic) does not need the whole WinXP or Vista baggage. It can be an appliance. It can even be an appliance using a separate network-attached storage - software becomes hardware...

    I envision a protocol where the DHCP server does the security, hands out the master password tokens, so that you don't need to login and configure every device on your network. Login as God to the home router/DHCP/DNS/NAT device and you have the authority necessary to configure a newly-installed device.

  92. Um, chorded are keyboards. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like the problem is with Qwerty rather than keyboards in general. Chorded keyboards would be more appropriate and smaller.

  93. To quote one of the tags... by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    Japan != the entire world. Given the amount of commonality much of Japanese culture presumably has with that of America and Europe at least, claiming that the PC is dying world wide because business is slow in Japan is an entirely unsupportable statement.

    I find it vexatious when it is assumed that the trends operating within one particular country are going to somehow magically become universal.

    I for one intend to be a desktop dinosaur for as long as possible. Their architecture is a lot more transparent than that of laptops, (meaning they're a lot easier to fix or upgrade) they're a lot cheaper, and the degree of versatility I get with my desktop isn't equalled by anything else.

    You might be able to play games and watch DVDs with the newest consoles; you can also do word processing with a Palm. However, you can't do word processing on a PS2, or gaming/DVDs on a handheld. If you want a machine where you can do any of those things, a PC is pretty much the only way to go. My own philosophy is that stated by Robert Heinlein, to be honest; Specialisation is for insects. ;)

  94. What applications does the average punter need? by igb · · Score: 1

    run a few apps like Word Processing and Spreadsheets,
    In the 1990s, the typical PC purchaser was an affluent, managerial or professional adult. Even if s/he didn't actually bring work home to do on the computer, they thought it would be a neat idea. That market is only 20% of the population, if that. Today, the PC market is essentially everyone with the money, and a huge proportion of them cannot or will not bring work home: manual, clerical, service industry. Some of them will have children who need to use machines for education but a lot won't. So I would assert that, given the most people don't have school age children and most people don't have jobs that encourage them to bring work home, the set of people who need a spreadsheet at home is substantially under 50%. Word processing, same argument. So a web / email / digital camera / games appliance does for most of the population.

    ian

  95. Re:cookin up a mug of by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    Isn't that why we have wikipedia?

  96. the power of laptops is impressive these days by Teriblows · · Score: 1

    dual core, that would have been undreamable 5 years ago. now every laptop is powerful enough for most desktop use and pleasant to use as well since lcds don't look like garbage anymore. you even get the bonus of always having a ups with the laptop battery. add the portability and the final killer app of wifi built in on every laptop and the selling points of a desktop just rapidly diminish. and the final blow is the low prices, a laptop is now cheap whereas in the past you could only get a laptop with passable cpu speed if you bought high end. now even low end is quite usable. and for the green crowd, a laptops 30-40watt total power consumption and power suspend/resume features cannot be beat. maybe apple desktops are good with the quick suspend stuff, but many self built or other desktops fall down on this one.

  97. This isn't really news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The PC has never, ever been a big presence in Japanese homes. This has been common knowledge for anyone who has paid attention to Japanese culture.

    They perfer their ketai (cell phones) over PCs for checking email. It's why there are so many Hello Kitty cell phone accessories. (not that I've looked or own any.)

  98. proprietary whining by WheatGrass · · Score: 1

    Perhaps fostering innovation rather than inhibiting it would bolster the market.

    For example, by way of rhetorical questions, why is there not a desktop computer based on the cell processor yet and why has Sony locked down access to the PS3 graphics processor?

  99. 640k by Kuvter · · Score: 1

    640GB should be enough for anyone... in Japan

    --
    "To be is to do." --Socrates
    "To do is to be." -- Aristotle
    "Do-Be-Do-Be-Do..." --Sinatra