Slashdot Mirror


Daily Caffeine Protects Your Brain

Chroniton writes "The BBC has a story that many Slashdot geeks will be happy to hear: the caffeine from a cup of coffee a day can help prevent Dementia, by blocking the damage of cholesterol. (At least in rabbits) This is in addition to the already-known protection against Alzheimer's Disease. More research is needed to test the effect on humans."

325 comments

  1. god damn it by timmarhy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Just make up your fucking minds already, every other week coffee is bad, then good, then bad again.

    like it's going to stop anyone drinking it anyway...

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:god damn it by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Old news flash: most stuff is okay as long as you enjoy it in moderation. If your coffee percolater feeds directly into an IV line then you probably aren't doing your body any good, but one or 2 cups a day and she'll be 'right.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:god damn it by Swizec · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's the same bloody thing with just about everything we intake these days. The newage crazies versus the scientists versus the governments are in a battle. A battle for brainwashing the living shit out of us. In the end we'll all just have to accept that we believe pretty much anything anyone tells us.

    3. Re:god damn it by electrictroy · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Better solution:

      Don't eat cholesterol. Then you won't have to worry about it damaging your brain. (Just a thought; I'm not a doctor.)

      I wonder how caffeine is supposed to reduce Alzheimer's disease? My dad drank a cup of coffee every day, but it doesn't seem to stop him from forgetting everything.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    4. Re:god damn it by Himring · · Score: 1

      70 natural foods help prevent one form of cancer, and cause another.

      The difference between a medication and a toxin is the dosage.

      "On a long enough timeline, the survival rate of everyone is zero." -Tyler Durden

      --
      "All great things are simple & expressed in a single word: freedom, justice, honor, duty, mercy, hope." --Churchill
    5. Re:god damn it by oliverthered · · Score: 4, Insightful

      most cholesterol is produced in you body and has little to do with what you eat e.g. some people can eat stake all day and be fine other can eat nothing but lattice and have a cholesterol problem.

      Studies on eggs have show that they make no difference and infact a bit more exercise would help a world more than changing you diet.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    6. Re:god damn it by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just make up your fucking minds already, every other week coffee is bad, then good, then bad again.


      like it's going to stop anyone drinking it anyway...

      It's the media. They take a single study and purport it to be some kind of fact. Science doesn't work that way. Science only considers something 'known' when independent study after independent study shows the same thing to be true, and no studies which may have been contradictory have been shown to contradict the findings.

      These things take time. Looking at one study alone can be interesting, but it's stupid to take that study's findings as gospel truth.
    7. Re:god damn it by EyelessFade · · Score: 1

      Can se that. Cholesterol is essential to your brain, without it you will die.

    8. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      blocking the damage of cholesterol. (At least in rabbits) This is in addition to the already-known protection against Alzheimer's Disease.

      Perhaps then Alzheimer's is caused by cholesterol damage? You know, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then... what was I about to say? Ah, yes, then, perhaps eating too much duck meat is bad for your cholesterol if you are a rabbit?

      Who ARE You ?!?
    9. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha! Then I'll become a Breatharian!

    10. Re:god damn it by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's the media. They take a single study and purport it to be some kind of fact.

      It also seems to be the case that the less applicable your study, the more coverage you get. It's running joke now in epidemiology that you get more impact and coverage by showing a potential mechanism in 10 rabbits than you do by demostrating a genuine preventive effect in a population study of 100000 people.

    11. Re:god damn it by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0, Funny

      I would hate to eat a stake every day... now a STEAK, on the other hand, would be awesome. I just don't have the budget right now.

    12. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      most cholesterol is produced in you body and has little to do with what you eat e.g. some people can eat stake all day and be fine other can eat nothing but lattice and have a cholesterol problem.

      You are entirely correct, sir. If you eat pointy sticks all day, there's no way you will be getting excess cholesterol, whereas eating pastries all day can't be good for you.

    13. Re:god damn it by aurispector · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is so unfortunately true. Health fads are all about misinterpretation of the available data, and incomplete data for that matter. Every time there's some news item about the supposed health benefits of something, some idiot takes it to an extreme. Shortly thereafter conflicting data is released and suddenly everything we thought we knew was wrong. Eggs used to be heathy, then they were poisonous, now they're healthy again.

      Nobody is going to live forever because of some nutritional change. If you eat a wide variety of fresh unprocessed foods you'll do fine. Everything in moderation.

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    14. Re:god damn it by catwh0re · · Score: 2, Informative
      I for one will be a willing test subject for a daily caffeine dose. Jokes aside even laying in the sun will convert cholesterol into vitamin D.

      the thyroid will convert it into hormones, and most of your body-generated cholesterol gets converted into bile.

    15. Re:god damn it by Splab · · Score: 1

      "On a long enough timeline, the survival rate of everyone is zero." -Tyler Durden

      Well I for one plan to live forever or die trying!
    16. Re:god damn it by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      A prime example of this is Digg's "health" section, packed with 1-2 paragraph "articles" with no source, often just paraphrasing a similarly short(and sometimes SHORTER) article which may even be a summary of another link.

      You can expect to find no sources and hundreds of comments agreeing with the articles and marveling at their obviousness. After all, X knew somebody that had Y happen to them at some point. Thus, everybody should know the article to be fact right?

    17. Re:god damn it by somersault · · Score: 1

      Crystalline lattices do seem to cause problems though - keep away from ice!

      Yeah, preying on the lysdexic means cheap shots, but it can still be funny.. the comment itself was pretty insightful and interesting though, though it would be nice to see some references

      --
      which is totally what she said
    18. Re:god damn it by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Further to the above, I'm not dogging on Digg specifically, it's just a good example.

      http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=509580&cid=22949966

      We have the same thing here on Slashdot. In this thread even.

    19. Re:god damn it by tkdtaylor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well Stake and Lattice are all fiber anyways ;)
      I hope you're not eating the pressure treated kind.

    20. Re:god damn it by Kingrames · · Score: 2, Funny

      Most slashdotters are the vampire type, and eating stake would be very bad for their health.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    21. Re:god damn it by AugustZephyr · · Score: 0

      Well I guess I should pull this thing out then, huh?

    22. Re:god damn it by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yeah.. well... don't eat the popcorn at the movies or Chinese food; eggs are bad for you... wait a minute... no, they're not really bad for you after all.

      Alcohol is good. In moderation. If it's wine. If it's red wine. If it's one glass of red wine a day.

      When the media stops have Emily Litella moments, I'll start buying this garbage.

      Oh. Never mind.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    23. Re:god damn it by Eivind · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Won't work. Most of the cholesterol in your body is PRODUCED by your body, not obtained from ingested food.

      Indeed there's some controversy in medical-science circles currently over to what degree food-cholesterol (like in eggs) influence blood-cholesterol at all.

      Regardless of how that particular debate ends though, you'll have cholesterol in your blood even if you eat -zero- of it.

    24. Re:god damn it by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

      Somebody please mod parent up. He's right on.The dumb media wants to pander. Most journos are dumb about science, and desperate for some "relevant" news. In the name of news I hear things ranging from new techniques for making gold from sea water, to cocaine being good for health.

    25. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well screw you!

      ahem. sorry. Too much bile.

    26. Re:god damn it by The+Queen · · Score: 1, Insightful

      a bit more exercise would help a world more than changing you diet.

      ...and therein lies the problem with these stories. Forgive my cynicism, but all us 'Mericans are much more inclined to binge on something we already like (coffee, wine, green tea, chocolate) than to lift our fannies off the couch and go for a walk.

      --

      The House Between - Original Sci-Fi Series
    27. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eggs have a lot of cholesterol .... that doesn't mean your body absorbs it and poof you become a cholesterol feind

    28. Re:god damn it by Reverend528 · · Score: 1, Funny

      other can eat nothing but lattice and have a cholesterol problem.


      my cholesterol is fine, but the crystals keep chipping my teeth.
    29. Re:god damn it by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The claims are interesting as just casual observation of old people 69-100 does not correlate with their findings. The people with dementia are from a generation that Coffee was drank for every reason and occasion. Hell even the Military gave them coffee in their C-rations it was available everywhere, even in the great depression the poor in the streets had coffee available to them from the aid workers and rescue missions. Coffee in my parents and grandparents age gap was more prevalent in their lives than it is today in society.

      I really wish they would publish more detailed information and also started going to aged people asking questions to see who drank a cup at least a day. The human research has been done, just nobody has bothered to ask the experiment members for the results.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    30. Re:god damn it by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Either way it's good for your Colon. and high fiber diets are known to reduce Cholesterol.

      The pressure treated will give you lots of copper in your diet.. If you get to the chewey center, then it has less of the green stuff in it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    31. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      a bit more exercise would help a world more than changing you diet. Exercise? The cure sounds worse than the disease!
    32. Re:god damn it by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not yet - reduce the daily dosage steadily every 3 days - half a scoop of grounds per day should be manageable - until you're down at about 2 scoops per day. Then comes the tricky part. You should be able to work your way back to mugs, but be careful not to bite down on the rim. Your body will also be used to a steady stream of caffeine, so keep it coming regularly at first - say a cup every half hour, otherwise you get those monkey on your back cravings and may find yourself climbing up the side of your building naked while listening to the 2001 OST and flinging faeces at people. That only happened one time though; I've now learned to be more careful when easing off after a deadline.

      Good luck.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    33. Re:god damn it by RealErmine · · Score: 1, Funny

      some people can eat stake all day
      *Not recommended for vampires.
      --
      Dewey, you fool! Your decimal system has played right into my hands!
    34. Re:god damn it by networkconsultant · · Score: 0

      Will it cross the monkey barrier? Did the population of rabbits increase more or less due to the caffine?

    35. Re:god damn it by raddan · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is true that most cholesterol is produced in the body, but that does not mean that dietary cholesterol is not important. First of all, the typical American diet is heavily weighted in favor of saturated fats. Saturated fats stimulate the body to release more cholesterol into the blood, of the LDL ("bad") variety. So while eating a food high in cholesterol may not contribute directly to your cholesterol level, typically those high cholesterol containing foods also contain large amounts of saturated fats, and those saturated fats will contribute to your cholesterol level. Steak is definitely a rich source of saturated fat, so you should moderate your intake.

      Which brings up another point: some people are more susceptible to the effects of high blood cholesterol than others. Unless you know for sure which group you're in (and who really does?), don't you think you should use a little discretion in choosing your diet? Furthermore, by getting your daily fat intake from vegetable sources, you're doing yourself additional favors, because you are probably also increasing your intake of dietary fiber, bioavailable vitamins, minerals, and anti-oxidants (which also has an LDL-lowering effect).

      You're right about the exercise bit, though. If people spent half as much energy worrying about their exercise regimen as they do fretting about whether they should eat carbs or not, people in general would be a lot healthier. Trust me, once you reach a certain level of daily exertion, your body will burn just about anything efficiently.

    36. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This just goes to show that science has once again proved that given time it will find break-through research that will accommodate anyone's lifestyle.

    37. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eating stakes and lattices? Is this the "landscaping supplies" diet? :P

    38. Re:god damn it by emilper · · Score: 1

      70 natural foods help prevent one form of cancer, and cause another.

      and lettuce is a bit toxic ... eating only lettuce would probably kill you before you die of hunger

    39. Re:god damn it by Hatta · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Interestingly enough, drinking coffee can cause higher cholesterol, even though it contains none. French press coffee contains cafestol which seems to boost the body's production of cholesterol (or inhibit the degredation, it's not clear). There's a measurable dose dependent effect, so as much as it pains me I've quit drinking French press coffee in favor of drip, a paper filter seems to bind the cafestol and remove it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    40. Re:god damn it by zotz · · Score: 1, Funny

      "most cholesterol is produced in you body and has little to do with what you eat e.g. some people can eat stake all day and be fine other can eat nothing but lattice and have a cholesterol problem."

      I am not sure I wood eat either one of those. Wood you? ~;-)

      all the best,

      drew

      --
      FreeMusicPush If you want to see more Free Music made, listen to Free
    41. Re:god damn it by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      "On a long enough timeline, the survival rate of everyone is zero." -Tyler Durden

      Well I for one plan to live forever or die trying! Just remember: Water is toxic, and oxygen is deadly
      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    42. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was amazing! "Cholesterol" was no problem, but "steak" and "lettuce" were too difficult to spell?

    43. Re:god damn it by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      To quote an old Scottish doctor that my dad used to know:

      "A glass 'o whisky and a good cigar now and again never killed a man, but moderation's the thing"

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    44. Re:god damn it by springbox · · Score: 2, Funny

      other can eat nothing but lattice and have a cholesterol problem.

      The mathematician's diet.

    45. Re:god damn it by sorak · · Score: 1

      Just make up your fucking minds already, every other week coffee is bad, then good, then bad again.

      That's what happens when researchers drink too much coffee


    46. Re:god damn it by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Or you could grow up.

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    47. Re:god damn it by spun · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, no, listen. Cholesterol is a type of fat. Fat floats. You know what else floats? Ducks! So you shouldn't eat anything that weighs as much as a duck. And you should dunk your rabbits in coffee before eating them.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    48. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who wood eat nothing but stakes or lattice anyway?

    49. Re:god damn it by Suitmonster · · Score: 1

      I'm scared to death of losing my mind at any age, and even happier to hear that my #1 addiction is finally having some positive medical media. I'm curious though - the study as posted only talks about a small amount of caffeine being beneficial relative to the amount I consume daily. I wonder if the effects are nullified, amplified, or otherwise altered by an increased dosage?

      --
      Resistance is NOT futile, it is Voltage divided by Current.
    50. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      regardless of whether coffee is inherently good or bad for me, coffee is what keeps me from going on homicidal rampages every day. it may *kill* me, but it keeps me from killing my fellow humans. I consider it my public duty, therefore, to drink it daily.

    51. Re:god damn it by pragma_x · · Score: 0, Redundant

      some people can eat stake all day and be fine other can eat nothing but lattice and have a cholesterol problem.

      Perhaps it has to do with the large amount of fiber in their diet?
    52. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most cholesterol is produced in you body and has little to do with what you eat e.g. some people can eat stake all day and be fine other can eat nothing but lattice and have a cholesterol problem.

      Stake: typically made from wood, arguable source of fiber, not sure about cholesterol.
      Lattice: an ornamental and/or structural criss-crossed framework, also typically made from wood.

      On the other hand STEAK and LETTUCE for what you say is probably somewhat correct though, perhaps you haven't had YOUR coffee yet!

    53. Re:god damn it by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

      A quick look through the medical literature reveals no strong evidence concerning the effects of caffeine on dementia. It's not something that will have been included in most major long term dementia studies. It is possible that a large study like the Cardiovascular Health Study or Rochester could examine this issue in detail.

      However, we know that a lot of dementia is caused by vascular disease in the brain, and by high blood pressure leading to stroke, and since we know that caffeine causes high blood pressure, it probably isn't a good idea to drink coffee as a preventive measure for anything.

    54. Re:god damn it by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      Once you realize this, then the battle is halfway over.

      Just take the latest and greatest new "research" with a grain of salt. I'm not against the research because we do make genuine progress (just look at the average life expectancy). But considering that we (collectively) are not all falling over dead, I seriously doubt that there is going to be any one magic bullet that cures [insert favorite disease here].

      My point is that I drank coffee before I read this and even if it had said that it would make me go crazy by age 30 I would probably still continue to drink my coffee. If you followed every "recommendation" out there you'd not only end up worse off, but also pretty poor since you'd be buying, selling, then buying and selling the same products over and over again.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    55. Re:god damn it by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "some people can eat stake all day and be fine other can eat nothing but lattice and have a cholesterol problem. [emphasis added]"

      "I would hate to eat a stake every day... now a STEAK, on the other hand, would be awesome. I just don't have the budget right now."
      What would be worse is if you had lattice every day with your stake!
      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    56. Re:god damn it by Barsteward · · Score: 1

      Stake is cholesterol free....... :o)

      --
      "The hands that help are better far than lips that pray." - Robert Ingersoll (1833-1899)
    57. Re:god damn it by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      My problem is that every time I try to cut down I get dangerously high levels of blood in my caffeinestream and I have to abort the attempt.

    58. Re:god damn it by Rogue+Haggis+Landing · · Score: 1

      Just make up your fucking minds already, every other week coffee is bad, then good, then bad again.

      There are a lot of things out there that are both good and bad for you. Running is good for you. Running can wreck your knees. Red wine is good for your heart. Red wine is bad for your liver.

      Everyone has to make his own personal risk assessment decisions. Or decide to just say, "Screw it!"

    59. Re:god damn it by Suitmonster · · Score: 1

      My wife is a clinical psychologist and has often told me that stimulating the brain through activity (puzzles, word games, etc) is known way to stave off the onset of Alzheimer's. Perhaps the mental "wake-up" you get from caffeinated drinks is why this claim has been made?

      --
      Resistance is NOT futile, it is Voltage divided by Current.
    60. Re:god damn it by fellip_nectar · · Score: 1

      Well, according to this: If you weigh 160 lbs, coffee is okay unless you drink 101.58 cups of it.

      --
      Worst. Signature. Ever.
    61. Re:god damn it by srussia · · Score: 1

      Old news flash: most stuff is okay as long as you enjoy it in moderation. I'll say it again: statements like "Everything is OK in moderation" or "Anything in excess is harmful" are tautologies and therefore meaningless.

      Sorry, but parent should be modded -1 Redundant
      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    62. Re:god damn it by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      What bothers me most, is those who stick their dietary opinion in your nose. So long as my calorie input is near my calorie output, I'll be fine :)

      Now, time for another coffee :0

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    63. Re:god damn it by russotto · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sun? What is this "sun" you speak of?

    64. Re:god damn it by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      All (or at least most) of the cholesterol in your body is produced in your body in response to what you eat

      How your body responds is dependent on your genetic makeup and general health, but loading your body with saturated fats and starving it in respect of minerals, vitamins etc. coupled with a lack of exercise will always make the majority of peoples bodies react by producing more cholesterol and stop it recycling what is already there ...

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    65. Re:god damn it by sykodoc · · Score: 1

      Didn't I work for you? Back in 1999? tps reports...

      --
      "Our enemies will talk themselves to death and we will bury them in their own confusion!"
    66. Re:god damn it by somersault · · Score: 1

      Didn't say everything, I said most stuff. Cyanide in moderation is probably pretty bad for you. Just because you know it's true doesn't mean that other people shouldn't think about it more often, these idiots always seem to be swinging wildly to the "GOOD!!" or "BAD!!" side of things, rather than realising that a lot of life is just about keeping a balance.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    67. Re:god damn it by philspear · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that "just making your minds up about it" would mean ignoring evidence, and would instantly make them politicians not scientists.

      "Okay guys, the slashdotting public is tired of this back and forth, we need to pick one and go ahead with it. All in favor of coffee is healthy for you raise your hand now!"

    68. Re:god damn it by somersault · · Score: 1

      Not too likely, unless you have ever had any bosses that are 15 years old? I bet you feel old now, eh? :p I certainly do.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    69. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong.

      Eating saturated fat produces LDL and HDL in a fixed ratio. This is not bad for you, the ratio is what's important, not the total amount, as many seem to think. Eating trans-fatty acids (hydrogenated) raises LDL without raising HDL. This is bad. Eating poly/monounsaturated fats lowers LDL and raises HDL. This is good.

      Source

    70. Re:god damn it by MajinBlayze · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of one of my favorite sayings: Too much of anything is a bad thing.

      Of course it's bad, otherwise it wouldn't be called "Too Much"

      --
      "Hate is baggage. Life's too short to be pissed off all the time." Danny Vinyard -American History X
    71. Re:god damn it by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      Do you know what else floats? Small rocks!

    72. Re:god damn it by syphaxplh · · Score: 1

      Coffee is always good.

    73. Re:god damn it by Sanat · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, this is the garden variety diet

      --
      And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
    74. Re:god damn it by ivoras · · Score: 1

      The only thing that's certain is that nothing is black-or-white. Even oxygen and water will poison you if you get too much of them.

      --
      -- Sig down
    75. Re:god damn it by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Sun? What is this "sun" you speak of? It's the thing up overhead that brings the Warm Time every day.
    76. Re:god damn it by raddan · · Score: 2, Informative
      Your logic is flawed. Eating saturated fats may produce LDL and HDL in a fixed ratio, but that ratio is still not good for you. Trans fats are even worse, as you point out. But the former type, in general, should still be moderated. Your own source says it here, simply:

      What is becoming clearer and clearer is that bad fats, meaning saturated and trans fats, increase the risk for certain diseases while good fats, meaning monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats, lower the risk. The key is to substitute good fats for bad fats.
    77. Re:god damn it by UED++ · · Score: 0

      I've been running all over Azeroth, ALL DAY. If that isn't exercise slap me in the face you insensitive clod!

    78. Re:god damn it by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 4, Funny

      They own Java, though I didn't know that contained caffeine.

    79. Re:god damn it by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Sun? What is this "sun" you speak of? It's the thing up overhead that brings the Warm Time every day. I live in Wisconsin, you insensitive clod! We get Warm Times maybe 50% of the days, tops.
      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    80. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like someone hasn't had their coffee today..

    81. Re:god damn it by srussia · · Score: 1

      Didn't say everything, I said most stuff. Cyanide in moderation is probably pretty bad for you. Sorry about jumping from "most stuff" to "everything", and I do appreciate the wisdom that people try to convey by recommending "moderation". Indeed, I have tried to implement this advice in my own personal quest for "happiness" or "balance".

      The problem is that aside from being subjective (a "moderate" amount for one person may be "excessive" for another), such statements always parse to a tautology (A=A).

      P.S.: Cyanide: Medical uses The cyanide compound sodium nitroprusside is occasionally used in emergency medical situations to produce a rapid decrease in blood pressure in humans; it is also used as a vasodilator in vascular research. The molecule of Vitamin B12 usually also contains cyanide.

      I occasionally indulge in "moderate" cyanide consumption (in vitamin B12) in order to regain my "balance" after inadvertently imbibing alcohol in "excess".

      Cheers.
      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    82. Re:god damn it by tool462 · · Score: 1

      I walk two miles to my favorite coffee shop every day. I exercise to pay for my binging :)

    83. Re:god damn it by sapgau · · Score: 1

      Whoa, someone missed drinking their cup before coming to work!

    84. Re:god damn it by WebCowboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If people spent half as much energy worrying about their exercise regimen as they do fretting about whether they should eat carbs or not, people in general would be a lot healthier.

      This isn't entirely true. The general public doesn't give enough consideration to their health in general. Neither diet NOR physical activity are given enough attention as we all eat far too many refined carbohydrates and saturated fats AND lead sedentary lives that just aggravate the situation.

      I know people who lead physically active lives (typically having physically demanding jobs), are not the slightest bit overweight (quite lean builds in fact) and by outward appearances look physically healthy...but they skip breakfast, and eat cheeseburgers and fries for lunch and supper every day and smoke moderately. They get sick more often and are the types of people who have digestion problems and end up being the people in conversations like "HE had a heart attack? But he looked so healthy!"

      Diet certainly IS very important. The problem is that we eat very badly, and when we focus on diet we don't eat balanced diets--we go on "extreme atkins" or try to eat like Jarod or eat carefully, artificially-portioned pre-packaged meals like Nutrisystem so we can lose weight and "look nice".

      Diet is JUST AS IMPORTANT as physical activity; you CANNOT say "Oh, I work out every day so I can eat just about anything". Though physical activity provides the most impact on metabolism and many other health factors, it is DIET that has the largest impact on weight. Think about it: It takes mere seconds to a couple of minutes to eat a chocolate bar, which cancels out the calories you expend on 20 minutes of medium-to-intense cardio activity. It's well known that losing weight and/or increasing % of lean body mass has a notable impact on harmful cholesterol...so if you want to lose weight and be more healthy don't use exercise as an excuse to eat those sugar and fat-laden chocolate bars.

    85. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Trust me, once you reach a certain level of daily exertion, your body will burn just about anything efficiently.

      How many miles a week of running is this level? 30? 40? 50? 70?

      I'd like to know if I'm over it (well, I'm not counting the other sports, because I know running pushes the heart rate highest of the sports I do, so I assume it contributes most to the daily exertion threshold).

      Alternately, can you compare this minimum daily exertion level to which you refer to a #calories exercise per day?

    86. Re:god damn it by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      Peculation, man. It's not quite as earthy as French press but still MUCH MUCH less bitter than drip.

    87. Re:god damn it by Ahnteis · · Score: 1

      I wood half thought that a slash-dotter would under stand how a spell checker works.

    88. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pointed sticks! Oh oh oh, we want to know about the nutrition of pointed sticks, do we? Getting all high and mighty, eh? Fresh fruit not good enough for you, eh? Oh oh oh! Well let me tell you something my lad, when you're walking home tonight and some great homicidal maniac comes after you about the nutrition of loganberries, don't come crying to me!

      (captcha: splinter)

    89. Re:god damn it by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      So run your French press through a paper filter. I'm sure you can rig something up.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    90. Re:god damn it by malkir · · Score: 1

      "Studies on eggs have show that they make no difference and infact a bit more exercise would help a world more than changing you diet." Exactly. What people seem to overlook constantly is the inevitable GOOD effects of exercise on your body. Health, brain, and psyche all improve when you exercise regularly. We've only been sitting around for the last 50-70 years, and we've been running around hunting and foraging for millions. Honestly nerds have the capability of being more healthy than jocks do in my opinion, because there are laws of nutrition that lots of people just cant get their head around. Good, healthy food + a bit of exercise = significantly fewer health problems

    91. Re:god damn it by AI0867 · · Score: 1

      It's that awfully bright light in the big blue room, I'm not sure if IBM owns it.

    92. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite simple, really. The studies done at princeton and harvard, you pay attention to, the studies funded by maxwell and folgers, you ignore. couldn't be simpler.

    93. Re:god damn it by justinchudgar · · Score: 1

      Some people may suggest abandoning your keyboard and going outside to observe this "sun". I recommend that you visit http://umbra.nascom.nasa.gov/images/latest.html instead. Much less effort required. :)

      --
      WARNING: Smoking this sig may cause lowered IQ, insanity or short term memory loss. It is also really bad for your monit
    94. Re:god damn it by SlowMovingTarget · · Score: 1

      And who are all these people complaining about sax an violins on television? I think there should be more sax and violins on television. What? Oh! Never mind!

    95. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just make up your fucking minds already

      Sounds like someone needs to switch to decaf.

    96. Re:god damn it by joelSantaguida · · Score: 1

      Doesn't this happen with EVERY internet fact?

    97. Re:god damn it by Hatta · · Score: 1

      That would kind of defeat the purpose of drinking unfiltered coffee. The oils that contain the cafestol also contain a lot of flavor.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    98. Re:god damn it by carloz · · Score: 1

      Just make up your fucking minds already, every other week coffee is bad, then good, then bad again.

      like it's going to stop anyone drinking it anyway...

      I`m with you dude, I consider this to be bullshit. My grandma has been drinking coffee before I hair on my balls and now has dementia for a few years.
    99. Re:god damn it by geekoid · · Score: 1

      1 cup, and may help lower the risk.
      Please TRY to understand.

      "I really wish they would publish more detailed information and also started going to aged people asking questions to see who drank a cup at least a day. The human research has been done, just nobody has bothered to ask the experiment members for the results."

      really? that's your way of getting good data? seriously?

      The plural of anecdote is anecdotes, not data.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    100. Re:god damn it by BooRolla · · Score: 1

      Well who would you compare them to? Before this last generation, not a lot of folks lived long enough to develop dementia compared to today.

    101. Re:god damn it by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I'm going the middle road. I take several stakes and arrange them in a lattice. Then I eat them. Crunchy and semi-healthy.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    102. Re:god damn it by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      A hot ball of burning radioactive gas outside the Earth's athmosphere. Is strongly advise against trying to lie down inside the sun, as the high temperatures would cause severe side effects such as heavy burns, denaturation of vital proteins and instant vaporization. Also, the radiation emitted by the sun is known to cause cancer, which is why direct line of sight should be avoided at any cost.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    103. Re:god damn it by Hucko · · Score: 1

      That was a really poor example. I'm not saying they don't exist... but that actually worked against you.

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
    104. Re:god damn it by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I read about that too - I had thought the measured Cholesterol was up slightly in 10% of the subjects or something.

      Anyway, can't you just pass your french-pressed coffee through a paper filter and have the best of both worlds?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    105. Re:god damn it by clem · · Score: 1

      Just make up your fucking minds already, every other week coffee is bad, then good, then bad again.


      like it's going to stop anyone drinking it anyway...

      Like that one study that claims coffee can make you impatient and irritable.
      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    106. Re:god damn it by raddan · · Score: 1

      After doing a 2 year bout training for long-distance XC events and ultramarathon events, I am down to the 40 miles/week range. Previously, I was in the 50-60/wk range, but that level of training became very difficult to maintain when I started going to school again. Actually, the training wasn't difficult-- the school was-- and after a long run, I just couldn't focus anymore. Prior to that period, I was in the 40's range like I am now, and it seems to suit me well. My diet is a more "normal" now, which means I am not hungry all the time, although my girlfriend thinks I still eat like a horse ;^) I'm not sure what I consume daily at the moment, but if I had to guess, I'd say around the 4500 kcal/day range.

      But my really big bout with calorie consumption was when I hiked the Appalachian Trail in 2003. That was 6 months of very long days, and at the height of the summer, when you could hike all day and though a lot of the night, I estimate, conservatively, that I was consuming about 12,000 kcal a day. My daily GORP consumption alone could be measured in pounds! I don't think it was surprising that at that level, I was gravitating toward peanuts, which are just loaded with calories (from fat). That's for 17 miles a day. I was lean when I started, but boy, was I lean when I got back! I lost quite a bit of muscle as well, despite stuffing my face every opportunity I got. I actually had dreams about pizza, which for some odd reason, I could not find ANYWHERE in Georgia or North Carolina.

    107. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a bit more exercise would help a world more than changing you diet.
      Exercise? The cure sounds worse than the disease!

      health levels are based on about 80% diet and 20% exercise. the problem is, very few people know what a healthy diet is. the folks over at Harvard medical School's joslin diabetes center have studied the latest research on diet and came up with these guidelines:

      http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/502699

      for folks who know their diets, they will recognize this as the zone diet, first put forth by dr. sears (PhD, lipid researcher, not medical) over 15 years prior to joslin jumping on the zone diet bandwagon.

      the results of this diet are staggering. a few of the highlights include:

      1. Stanford swimmers brought home 8 gold medals in the 1992 Olympics.
      2. Stanford swimmers brought home 8 gold medals in the 1996 Olympics.
      3. the top two medal winners in the history of the modern day olympics are both zoners - jenny thompson and dara torres.
      4. the top gold medal winner in the history of the modern day olympics is a zoner - jenny thompson.
      5. The oldest swimmer to make the Olympic team has been a Zoner ever since Dr. Sears introduced his diet. That's 1992, 1996, 2000 and 2004. Oh, and it was 4 different swimmers each time, so you can exclude a single freak athlete as the root cause.
      6. dara torres set the american 50m free record as a 40 year old while competing at the 2007 nationals. she also won the 100m free event. she looks to make the 2008 olympic team as a41 year old - the oldest person ever to make the team and the 5th straight olympics that a zoner will be the oldest olympian on the team.
      7. manuel uribe has lost over 400 lbs on the zone diet, as well as his depression and hunger. he still weighs over 800 lbs and consumes only 2,000 calories a day. his lipid profile is one of the better lipid profiles in mexico! http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Story?id=2799700&page=1 . you can read dr. sears' response to the show and see the lipid profile of the then 800 lb man (he weighs less now) here: http://www.drsears.com/tabid/399/itemid/10218/Its-good-medicine-not-a-medical-mystery.aspx

      my results have been incredible, too. i *love* my diet - i feel great, i'm much less hungry, i love what i eat, my energy has sky rocketed, i've dropped from 20% body fat to 11% body fat and I've gone from a 36" waist to a 32" waist in less than 9 months. my abs look better in my 40s than they did at any prior point in my life because i *never* had visible abs before. my body fat drips away and my muscles grow at twice the rate of when I was in my late teens, early twenties. oh, and my allergies are 95% diminished and i went a full year without calling in sick for the first time in my life. all this on less than 1800 calories per day (you need fewer calories on the zone diet because you can generate more atp from a calorie of fat than a calorie of carbohydrate (glucose)). my friend ended a 5.5 year constant back pain nightmare within one day of going on the zone + fish oil. she resisted changing her diet until she dropped $10k, out of pocket, on an mri to help identify her problem. Now she doesn't have a back problem - and her nsaid induced ulcer problem is now gone, too.

      go the following page and download the pdf on the Anti-Inflammatory Medicine Monograph link (upper right hand corner).

      http://drsears.com/ZoneResources/tabid/384/Default.aspx

      not mentioned here is the correlation found between waist size and dementia - and I guarantee that this correlation is lot more serious than not drinking coffee. drinking coffee to reduce the risk of dementia and alzheimers (up to 270% greater risk co

    108. Re:god damn it by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      2 cups a day and she'll be 'right.
      Who'll be right? Did you sneak a girl into your slashdot account? You know the rules! No visitors after login. The Dean will hear about this!
    109. Re:god damn it by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      I did not realize that. I drink a fair amount of coffee, but I know nothing of the gourmet coffees. In fact the word "gourmet" sounds like "dead kitten" in my language. Not something I'd want to taste...

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    110. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why all the fuss over cholesterol? it isn't even a very good gauge of future heart disease.

      half of all people admitted to the hospital with a heart attack have normal cholesterol.

      what medicine has been clinically proven to reduce heart disease? aspirin, which has *zero* impact on cholesterol.

      if you want a better gauge as to future heart disease risk, as well as other chronic disease risk, check your fasting insulin level or you tg/hdl ratio. iirc, your fasting insulin should be around 5 and your tg (triglycerides) / hdl (hdl cholesterol) should be around 1 or less. if either value is significantly higher, you run a high risk of future problems.

      an even easier way to estimate your insulin output is to look at the size of your belly. is it big? if so, you likely over produce insulin and are at risk - even if your cholesterol is "normal" or "perfect". that big belly may alsoi indicate a 270% greater chance of developing dementia as you age.

      why is cholesterol touted the most as an indicator of heart disease risk? first, it can be controlled easily by patentable drugs. second, they make $10 billion a year doing so.

      can drugs control insulin or your tg/hdl ratio? not easily or effectively.

      can diet?

      absolutely.

      go t the following link and click on the anti-inflammation medicine monograph to learn more (it is a pdf, so you can right click and save as):

      http://www.drsears.com/ZoneResources/tabid/384/Default.aspx

      if you apply the zone diet and supplement with fish oil, you will upgrade your life dramatically.

      cholesterol has some limited importance, but it has been blown way out of proportion by the billion dollar drug companies.

    111. Re:god damn it by rhubarb42 · · Score: 1

      one cup a day won't make a difference one way or the other.

    112. Re:god damn it by catwh0re · · Score: 1

      you win at the internet.

    113. Re:god damn it by aurispector · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Quality of life is a valid reason for drinking coffee, etc.. There are a bunch of poor saps out there starving themselves because of some study showing that mice on a severely calorie restricted diet live 50% longer. Personally I'd prefer laughing from my deathbed while eating an ice cream sundae, but that's just me. Seriously, do these nitwits really believe this finding is directly transferrable from mice to humans? How about at least waiting for a study involving actual primates? How about enjoying your life? Scallops wrapped in bacon anyone?

      Coffee is a great example: a while back someone did a meta analysis and found the studies were basically a wash. Do what you want in moderation. I like to roast my own coffee, grind it immediately prior to brewing, french press it nice and strong and drink it with a lot of cream but no sugar. I don't drink every day but when I do I want to really enjoy it.

      Besides, whats the point of indulging if you dont indulge? Diet ice cream? Give me a break!

      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    114. Re:god damn it by John+Newman · · Score: 1

      Perhaps then Alzheimer's is caused by cholesterol damage? You know, if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then... what was I about to say?
      It might. At least, high cholesterol is associated with a higher risk for Alzheimer's. And statins, which alter cholesterol metabolism, are protective against Alzheimer's. There's some very interesting science about why that is, having to do with the makeup of the lipid particles in the cell membrane in which the Alzheimer's Precursor Protein lives. Quack quack.
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18288926
      http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17986151
    115. Re:god damn it by taylorcp · · Score: 1

      "Just make up your fucking minds already, every other week coffee is bad, then good, then bad again.
      like it's going to stop anyone drinking it anyway..."

      Then it might be f'in good or bad depending on your genetic makeup... or at least that's what my girlfriend says. (Oh wait, this is /. no one will believe that... the girlfriend part I mean.)

    116. Re:god damn it by Irvan · · Score: 1

      Good and Bad, White and Black, Yin and Yang, so does coffee..

      --
      'sometime the moron called himself as idiot'
    117. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Throughout majority of human history, people were eating saturated fats almost exclusively. This allowed us to develop our brains. Only very very recently, relatively speaking, agricultural revolution changed our diet towards less saturated fat. However, everybody is convinced that saturated fats are evil, which is clearly not the case.

    118. Re:god damn it by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      If coffee is bad, then I don't want to be good!

    119. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice job with the "accidental" misspellings, it got you more replies than you would have normally gotten :-)

    120. Re:god damn it by discogravy · · Score: 1

      Because who wants to eat brain-damaged rabbits with Alzheimers? Healthy rabbits that will remember you right as you're about to kill and eat them, that's what you want. Try not to use their bones in your beard, though. I hear that ticks them off.

    121. Re:god damn it by instarx · · Score: 1

      Who wood eat nothing but stakes or lattice anyway?
      It's like getting double portions since you can make stakes out of lattice. Just kidding, but I am getting tired of all these misteaks.
    122. Re:god damn it by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

      How are you able to spell cholesterol but can't spell "steak" or "lettuce?" Wow.

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    123. Re:god damn it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in the UK, you you insensitive clod! We get Warm Times maybe 5% of the days, tops.

    124. Re:god damn it by Torvaun · · Score: 1

      Almost certainly higher, if you use the same standard of Warm Times I am. I'm starting Warm Times at 50 F(10 C). We breached that for the first time this year yesterday.

      --
      I see your informative link, and raise you a pithy comment.
    125. Re:god damn it by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      But that's not true. Not everything is okay in moderation, and not everything we consider "moderation" really is in terms of being good for you. Many suggest caffeine, in non-ridiculous amounts, isn't good for you.

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
    126. Re:god damn it by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Who wooden?

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  2. Braiiiins by McGiraf · · Score: 1, Funny

    Braiiiins

    1. Re:Braiiiins by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Chaaaaaaange

    2. Re:Braiiiins by SoulRider · · Score: 1

      Thats just what I was thinking. "Oh great, now when the zombie invasion comes they are all going to come after me and my healthy brain"

  3. How odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's funny, because the more cups of coffee I drink, the crazier everyone else says I am. I must just be the only sane one, sitting here rearranging my pencils after my eighth cup this morning.

    1. Re:How odd by chriscoolc · · Score: 1

      I must just be the only sane one Well, you and your rabbits.
    2. Re:How odd by Kamineko · · Score: 4, Funny

      Here's a challenge. Try to arrange six pencils of the same length so that they're all touching every other pencil.

      Without snapping or disintergrating them.

    3. Re:How odd by cpricejones · · Score: 1

      Now where did I place my mug ...

    4. Re:How odd by SailorSpork · · Score: 1

      You're not the only crazy one. Who the HELL caffeinates RABBITS?! I own rabbits, and all of my "drug test" ideas usually involve tranquilizers...

    5. Re:How odd by not+flu · · Score: 1

      Without snapping or disintergrating them. Damn, I was already thinking "will it blend?"
    6. Re:How odd by dodobh · · Score: 1

      Make a tetrahedron. Trivial.

      --
      I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
    7. Re:How odd by Eric+Sharkey · · Score: 1

      Trivial, but wrong.

      In a tetrahedron, each pencil touches two other pencils at each end, for a total of four out of the five other pencils.

    8. Re:How odd by XnPlater · · Score: 1

      You mean like the three perpendicular coordinate axes split in 5 +/- parts touching in 3D, instead of the +/- parts being sharpened pencils? Oh well, probably not.

      Now where did I put my coffe...

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    9. Re:How odd by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Make an asterisk with their sharpened points touching in the middle.

      Alternatively, make one triangle pointing south and another pointing north and put one on top of the other.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    10. Re:How odd by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      Make an asterisk with their sharpened points touching in the middle.

      Perfectly conical pencil heads? I admire your sharpening tenacity. :P

      Alternatively, make one triangle pointing south and another pointing north and put one on top of the other.

      A 'star of David'? The parallel lines don't touch.
    11. Re:How odd by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      You can cheat by looking here: http://brainden.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=148 But that's cheating. :)

  4. BBC, not BCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll probably get modded down for this, but no matter.

    Message to the slashdot proofreaders: The story is being run by the BBC not the BCC.

    Ooops. :-D

    1. Re:BBC, not BCC by deniable · · Score: 1

      No, it's a blind carbon copy of the BBC. Call it a dupe in advance.

    2. Re:BBC, not BCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It being the BBC, everyone who tagged this "coffee" is wrong: they should be tagging it "tea", or at least "earlgreyhot" (Note spelling of "grey")

    3. Re:BBC, not BCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll probably get modded down for this, but no matter.
      Yes, because ACs have everything to lose.
    4. Re:BBC, not BCC by Hucko · · Score: 1

      yeah, I got caught with this coding in Java the other day, because of course I spell in the British English not USAian...

      --
      Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  5. Hmm yes by sleeponthemic · · Score: 1

    I don't know about you chaps and chappesses but I have my doubts about my 3-5 cup regime will ever being medically advisable. A glass of wine is good, too. A bottle? Perhaps not.

    --
    I record my sleeptalking
    1. Re:Hmm yes by Doc+Ri · · Score: 5, Funny

      A glass of wine is good, too. A bottle? Perhaps not.
      This is why I own glasses that can hold the entire content of a bottle.
      --
      617B3B7F7E7C7D7F00EOF
    2. Re:Hmm yes by CastrTroy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does it annoy anybody else that a cup of coffee is a standard in and of itself? A 12 cup coffee maker only makes 12, 5 oz. cups. Since when is 5 oz. equal to a cup? A measuring cup is 8 oz. the and cup that most people use for coffee is probably around 10-16 oz. So, in this study, do they mean the 5 oz. cup, the 8 oz. cup, or the 16 oz. cup?

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    3. Re:Hmm yes by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Does it annoy anybody else that a cup of coffee is a standard in and of itself?

      Nah; anyone interested in actual standard measurements would be using (milli)liters. If you use the English Imperial system (or even worse, the American variant), you're stating right up front that you don't really care about standards. If you did, why would you intentionally use a "standard" that's designed to be confusing and illogical?

      With coffee, a "cup" is the amount that nearly fills whatever size cup you happen to have grabbed off the shelf. And it means about the same thing in any retail establishment, except that you didn't choose the cup yourself.

      It's especially meaningless when you consider how easy it is to vary the strength of the coffee. The amount of caffeine (and flavor chemicals) in a "cup" of coffee varies by a factor of 4 or 5, depending on all the obvious factors.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    4. Re:Hmm yes by warrior_s · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are absolutely right... different countries also have different cup sizes.. If you order a cup of coffee in England, it will come in a really small cup, whereas in US, even the smallest (or tall in starbucks) is quite large comparatively.

    5. Re:Hmm yes by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      The important thing is the cup- doesn't matter how much is in it.

      Also, refills don't count, as long as there's still at least 1/4 of a cup at the bottom.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    6. Re:Hmm yes by Asuranceturix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Surprisingly, there is a somewhat "legal" definition of a cup in the US, at least according to the FDA, which is equal to 16 international tablespoons or 12 australian tablespoons or 240 ml, whatever you feel like. More information about the cup as a (crazy) measuring unit in the good ol' Wikipedia.

    7. Re:Hmm yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should definitely test this on rabbits.

    8. Re:Hmm yes by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      Damn, that means I was hallucinating all those small cups of coffee I've had through the years.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    9. Re:Hmm yes by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      5 oz = 140 ml, 16 oz = 454 ml. I just measured the largest mug I have available, and that's 250 ml. A normal teacup (IMO) is 125 ml.
      I've the impression tea/coffee cup sizes have been stable for a long time (and for china cups, they still are), it's only in the last few decades we've started to use mugs of increasingly ridiculous size for some reason. Things may be different in the US (home of the "Supersize" meals and drinks, after all), though.

    10. Re:Hmm yes by dohnut · · Score: 1

      Well, if you drink your coffee like the people who I know drink their coffee then the missing 3 oz is designed to leave room for various incarnations of cream and sugar.

      --
      Stupider like a fox! - H.S.
    11. Re:Hmm yes by AJWM · · Score: 1

      All that said, since the original study talked about the "caffeine equivalent" to a cup of coffee, they were probably talking about 100mg of caffeine, this being the number I've usually seen quoted for the caffeine content of a cup of coffee.

      Of course, the real caffeine content of a cup of coffee is going to vary all over the place depending on both the size of the cup and the strength of the coffee, as the above post points out.

      This page lists caffeine content for various coffees and other stuff. A cup (8oz) of instant coffee ranges from 27 to 173 mg caffeine (93mg avg). 8oz of generic brewed coffee has 102-200 mg (avg 133) caffeine. Starbucks and Einstein Bros come in at around 160 and 150mg per 8oz and Dunkin' Donuts at 103mg/8oz. The FDA limit on caffeine in colas is 71mg/12oz (about 47mg/8oz).

      --
      -- Alastair
    12. Re:Hmm yes by rcamans · · Score: 1

      I'm sure someone will find out that Starbucks funded the study, and only Starbucks is beneficial.
      So the cup size is the most expensive cup available at Starbucks.

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
  6. How could they possibly know this? by LaughingCoder · · Score: 5, Funny

    Surely the number of rabbits who enjoy a daily cup of coffee is such a small population as to be statistically insignificant.

    --
    The more you regulate a company, the worse its products become.
    1. Re:How could they possibly know this? by loftwyr · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but the number of rabbits with dementia is huge based on my cartoon viewing. So at least they have a good sized population to test it with.

      Perhaps we should start testing with ducks next. I've never seen a non-demented duck.

    2. Re:How could they possibly know this? by solraith · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're dethpicable.

    3. Re:How could they possibly know this? by bhsurfer · · Score: 1
      and let's not forget king arthur's run-in with a demented rabbit as well - we all know how THAT turned out.

      "run away, run away!"

      --
      Those are my principles, and if you don't like them... well, I have others.
      Groucho Marx
    4. Re:How could they possibly know this? by jma05 · · Score: 1

      You are confusing dementia with mania.

  7. Yeah it is by maxch · · Score: 1

    Savior's Cup Of Coffee. Nice.

  8. That's as maybe but.... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...anyone who goes into Starbucks and pays £2.50 for a cup of ground beans in a bit of hot water and hot milk, must have a screw loose!

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:That's as maybe but.... by kc2keo · · Score: 1

      indeed... I don't like starbucks coffee and the prices are pretty high. I'd rather make my own coffee or go get one from Dunkin Donuts.

    2. Re:That's as maybe but.... by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      Let me see:

      Crazy for going to Starbucks
      Crazy for paying 2.5£ for shit coffee

      and UTTERLY INSANE for putting milk in their coffee!!

      I think you are right

    3. Re:That's as maybe but.... by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Ok, Dunkin Donuts is cheaper, but how on earth do you consider their coffee good. Last time I was there (about a year ago) they were still serving their coffee in styrofoam cups. Who, in 2007 (it was last year) serves coffee in styrofoam? Not only is it bad for the environmentally unfriendly, it makes the coffee taste like, um... styrofoam!!!. Personally I don't like Starbucks much either, but I prefer coffee I make at home to any franchise.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:That's as maybe but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hot milk

      I drink my coffee black, you insensitive clod!
    5. Re:That's as maybe but.... by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      Damn Starbucks for managing to create, market, and sell a product that people want. You know, if they weren't a bunch of sellouts, they'd still be just one shop in Seattle selling crap coffee just like everyone else, instead of 1,000,000 shops selling crap coffee.
      Here is a breaking news bulletin: No matter where you go, if you order something beyond a plain black coffee, you're going to pay Starbucks prices.
      I don't drink Starbucks coffee, hell I don't drink coffee that much anywhere. I'm definitely no fan of the Starbucks obsession some people have, but you know what? People who bitch about Starbucks are even more annoying in their superior love of coffee shop XYZ. And don't get me started on the "coffee shop culture", obnoxious college kids sitting around all day either fiddling with a Mac (with the Apple prominently displayed) or talking loudly to their friends about how great that last anti-war march was and how hard Algebra for Art Majors is.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    6. Re:That's as maybe but.... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      To be fair to Starbucks, they are absolutely no better or worse than any of the other coffee chains we have here in the UK. But they all share the common problem of employing teenagers as "barristas" who have no idea about how to make coffee properly.

      No, I'm not a coffee snob but I drink black Americano coffee pretty much exclusively, I can get a great double Americano in my work canteen for 65p and, as someone who goes out to Spain a lot, any bar will sell you a good Americano for about 1.

      Yet just about 50% of the time that I go into a Starbucks or other coffee chain where I'm paying anything up to 4x as much, the coffee I get served is either weak, tepid or very bitter tasting meaning that I take it back and ask for it to be remade - and all because the teenager behind the counter hasn't taken a bit more care in making it.

      What makes it worse is that we British have a reputation for never complaining openly, just whinging quietly to ourselves, and this means that those providing a product or service get used to doing it in a lax manner. Having been to the US several times, service is much better and it's expected that you complain if something is not right.

      As for coffee shop culture, I agree, it's just for the posers with their Macs - but then, again, if I want something as simple as a coffee and see a queue at the counter of more than two people, I walk on by and go elsewhere because I'm not queueing for 15 minutes for something as simple as a coffee just to pose around in a comfortable chair.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    7. Re:That's as maybe but.... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
      No, I'm not a coffee snob but I drink black Americano coffee pretty much exclusively, I can get a great double Americano in my work canteen for 65p and, as someone who goes out to Spain a lot, any bar will sell you a good Americano for about 1.

      PS. Incidentally, the last bit should have said 1 Euro but for some reason Slashdot dropped the Euro symbol.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    8. Re:That's as maybe but.... by Digi-John · · Score: 1
      No, I'm not a coffee snob but I drink black Americano coffee pretty much exclusively, I can get a great double Americano in my work canteen for 65p and, as someone who goes out to Spain a lot, any bar will sell you a good Americano for about 1.

      There's an espresso machine, a grinder, and a lot of beans here at the office. The heavy drinkers pooled their money to get the equipment and now they just bring in beans and milk as needed. It works out nicely and is very cheap. I don't use the machine, because I don't drink enough coffee to make contributing to the supplies pool worthwhile (I'm a Coke man myself), but I've tried it a few times and the results were pretty good.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    9. Re:That's as maybe but.... by captainjaroslav · · Score: 1

      Alright, goddammit! That's the last straw! I'm a major caffeine addict and occasional Starbuck's customer and I want to declare an end to this myth. It's actually mostly milk people are buying when they buy those overpriced drinks. The real caffeine heads know you get more of the good stuff and pay less money when you buy drip coffee.

      Admittedly, the post I'm responding to did actually mention "milk," and also mentioned a cost in pounds, so I can assume that a) s/he knows it's only the latte-type and other "fancy" drinks that are the expensive ones and b) s/he lives in a country where drip coffee is not the norm. However, I'm always hearing somebody say that "a cup of coffee costs five dollars now" or "idiots go to Starbuck's and pay five dollars for a cup of coffee [there's often something about how they use their Macs while they're in there, too]!" Idiots go to Starbuck's and pay $5 for a cup of milk, with a little bit of coffee in it. If you just want coffee, you can still get a "venti" drip (which is way more over-roasted Starbuck's coffee than anybody should really be drinking in one sitting) for $2 or so, and a more rational sized cup is under $1.50.

      Real addicts don't drink lattes!

      --
      I'm just sayin'.
    10. Re:That's as maybe but.... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Oh, come on. How is it news when a pharma corporation sells its stuff at high prices? Starbucks just knew of the beneficial effects of coffee long before everyone else...

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    11. Re:That's as maybe but.... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is exclusively latin-1, if I remember correctly. Don't try to use HTML escapes, either. you can use Umlauts and similar characters all you want, but the Euro sign or anything else outside latin-1 is silently dropped.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  9. Caffeine or coffee? by lixee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How do they know it's the caffeine molecule and not the heaps of antioxidants present in coffee?

    --
    Res publica non dominetur
    1. Re:Caffeine or coffee? by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 5, Funny

      Shut up and buy what the study sponsor wants to sell you.

    2. Re:Caffeine or coffee? by Nibbler999 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The study was with caffeine supplements, not coffee.

    3. Re:Caffeine or coffee? by joeboomer628 · · Score: 1

      They gave 50% of the demented rabbits decaf

      --
      JoeR
    4. Re:Caffeine or coffee? by rhubarb42 · · Score: 1

      so the conclusion of the article is to drink coffee, not caffeine, which is *not* the logical conclusion of the data. that would be to eat caffeine pills. otherwise mountain dew would be just as sufficient as coffee. hmm... this is another example of bad science reporting.

    5. Re:Caffeine or coffee? by Atario · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Some of us don't like coffee (nor all the other compounds in it). Even if you do, it takes time to drink it. And it tends to be expensive these days. I find caffeine pills are far cheaper, easier, and are exactly as effective. Probably safer, too.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
  10. Yeah, yeah... by SimonGhent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This week coffee's good for you, next week it's bad for you.

    This week a glass of wine a day prevents altzheimers, last week that was classed as binge drinking and caused high blood pressure.

    This week sausages cause cancer, no doubt next week they'll help prevent MS.

    It's all a load of old cock. And no doubt a load of old cock either causes or prevents heart disease (depending which week you take your old cock).

    --
    simon
    1. Re:Yeah, yeah... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Funny
      This week sausages cause cancer, no doubt next week they'll help prevent MS.

      If eating a pack of Bratwurst's will, in any way, stop the adoption of Windows Vista, then you can definitely count me in.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    2. Re:Yeah, yeah... by curmudgeous · · Score: 1

      This week sausages cause cancer, no doubt next week they'll help prevent MS.

      So, if I eat sausages does that mean I don't have to "upgrade" to Vista?

    3. Re:Yeah, yeah... by Sobrique · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It is entirely possible that a glass of wine can both prevent altzheimers, and cause high blood pressure. Just because some of the effects of something are beneficial, and some are negative doesn't mean that one precludes the other.

      Most medicines, after all, include side effects.

    4. Re:Yeah, yeah... by oxidiser · · Score: 1

      So drink coffee and wine this week and stay away from sausage. Next week, skip the drinks but eat all the sausage you want!

    5. Re:Yeah, yeah... by SimonGhent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yup, agree entirely, but I was trying to get across a point (albeit flippantly) about the way the media report these kind of stories.

      For example, the front page of this Monday's Metro (a free morning paper distributed across the UK) was "A Sausage a Day Increases cancer Risk by 20%". It wasn't just sausages, but all processed meat (bacon, salami, etc.). There was no mention of what the % risk of getting stomach cancer is, but I think that a fair few members of the general public would read that as the risk increases from, say, 5% to 25%, rather than the 5% to 6% increase that it really is.

      Food, drink and drug "scare stories" are a weekly occurrence here, particularly pushed by a section of the UK press (Express and Mail being the worst) and breakfast TV. It just has the result that people switch off. Pregnant women have recently been advised not to drink at all, whereas the previous advice was "one or two glasses of wine is fine". The evidence hasn't changed, but because of the "binge drinking epidemic" the advice has and it's top of the news programmes and on the front pages.

      --
      simon
    6. Re:Yeah, yeah... by raddan · · Score: 1

      If you work in medicine or biology, most of the research on the effects of various foods on the body is unambiguous. The fact that people feel the way you do is a testament to the efficacy of the PR efforts by the various food industries. Read this sometime.

    7. Re:Yeah, yeah... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      caffeine, not coffee.
      enjoy a cup of good japanese green tea - it is healthy in general and tasty too.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    8. Re:Yeah, yeah... by Kamineko · · Score: 1

      Breakfast. Yum. Except for the load of old cock.

    9. Re:Yeah, yeah... by russotto · · Score: 1

      If you work in medicine or biology, most of the research on the effects of various foods on the body is unambiguous.
      Yeah, it's all bad for you. Calorie restriction is the way to live... or rather, to die the most slowly.
    10. Re:Yeah, yeah... by Eevee · · Score: 1

      ...This week sausages cause cancer, no doubt next week they'll help prevent MS. It's all a load of old cock...

      I realize that sausages are made of the leftover bits, but I would try a brand that doesn't contain only old cock...not that I'm passing judgement or anything.

    11. Re:Yeah, yeah... by raddan · · Score: 1

      You know, I've been hearing a lot about caloric restriction these days, probably because it is a lot easier for most people to stop eating than to start exercising-- but I've been wondering if there are any studies comparing the two approaches. My gut feeling (as an athlete) is that it would be a bad idea to try to combine the two approaches, and that the obvious positive benefits of exercise (mood improvements, bone density and joint toughness, physical capability, etc) are lacking in caloric restriction. Maybe you live longer with the restriction approach, but are you healthier and happier? I don't know.

    12. Re:Yeah, yeah... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I hate they type of statement.
      I wish people who go on like that would point out it's not the scientists changing things, it's the media not reporting it properly, and the populace for not understanding the importance, or lack there of, of one study.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Forgot the difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can anyone explain what the difference between Dementia and Alzheimer's disease is ?

    1. Re:Forgot the difference by SimonGhent · · Score: 4, Informative

      Alzheimer's is a specific disease.

      Dementia is just a general term for (usually) old-age brain rot.

      --
      simon
  12. Demented rabbits? by unstable23 · · Score: 5, Funny

    How do they know?

    As anyone who's ever owned a rabbit will tell you, they're pretty demented to begin with.

    And a rabbit on caffeine is just plain scary.

    1. Re:Demented rabbits? by McNihil · · Score: 1

      Yup scary indeed...

      from the top of my head... as I remember the dialog in that movie with a killer rabbit.

      "Thou shall count to three... not to four nor to two... to three."

      "Can I count to five?"

      "No Sire... to Three"

      The holy hand grenade.

    2. Re:Demented rabbits? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Yup scary indeed...

      from the top of my head... as I remember the dialog in that movie with a killer rabbit.

      "Thou shall count to three... not to four nor to two... to three."

      "Can I count to five?"

      "No Sire... to Three"

      The holy hand grenade. It would seem you do not remember that dialog after all. :)

      Cleric: And the Lord spake, saying, "First shalt thou take out the Holy Pin. Then shalt thou count to three, no more, no less. Three shall be the number thou shalt count, and the number of the counting shall be three. Four shalt thou not count, neither count thou two, excepting that thou then proceed to three. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then lobbest thou thy Holy Hand Grenade of Antioch towards thy foe, who, being naughty in my sight, shall snuff it.
      Brother Maynard: Amen.
      All: Amen.
      King Arthur: Right. One... two... five.
      Galahad: Three, sir.
      King Arthur: Three.
    3. Re:Demented rabbits? by McNihil · · Score: 1

      Heh... I plead not being awake at all!

    4. Re:Demented rabbits? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No harm, no foul. This is just /. where any misquoting of geek-loved media cannot go uncorrected. ;)

    5. Re:Demented rabbits? by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      For that we have the holy handgrenade.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    6. Re:Demented rabbits? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      As anyone who's ever owned a rabbit will tell you, they're pretty demented to begin with. Eh, what's up, Doc?
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  13. Thisisgreatnews! by An+anonymous+reader · · Score: 5, Funny

    Caffeineisthebest!NowIdonthavetoworryaboutdementiaoralzheinersdiseases.Ivolunteertobethefirsthumantestsubject!AsamatteroffactIjusthadtwelvecupsofcoffeerightbeforeipostedthis!:-)Nowiamgoingtovacumthefloorsinmyoffice,Ihatedirtyfeet!Haveagreatdayeveryone!

    1. Re:Thisisgreatnews! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caffeineisthebest!NowIdonthavetoworryaboutdementiaoralzheinersdiseases.Ivolunteertobethefirsthumantestsubject!AsamatteroffactIjusthadtwelvecupsofcoffeerightbeforeipostedthis!:-)Nowiamgoingtovacumthefloorsinmyoffice,Ihatedirtyfeet!Haveagreatdayeveryone!

      Thank you for entering your problem ticket. We have found which key on your keyboard suffered the most damage from your spilled coffee.

      Help Desk

    2. Re:Thisisgreatnews! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ireallyenjoytheseslahsdottags

    3. Re:Thisisgreatnews! by xtracto · · Score: 1

      You killed slashdot!

      You bastard!

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    4. Re:Thisisgreatnews! by electrostaticcarrot · · Score: 1

      Indeed, and here is an article that goes at length in describing the wonders of caffeine. Judging by your writing, you should have no trouble reading it.

    5. Re:Thisisgreatnews! by numbware · · Score: 1

      Looks like you spilled your coffee on your spacebar.

      --
      I'm going to go create my own technology news site, with blackjack and hookers. You know what? Forget the news site.
    6. Re:Thisisgreatnews! by sl33p3r · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but s/\s//g sure is bad.

  14. A-HA! So that's their secret? by j1976 · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows the sexual capacity of rabbits. You though it was from munching all them carrots? Oh no, it's the caffeine! ( /me goes to make another cup of coffee )

  15. for the scientifically minded by puck01 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's a link to the actual article:

    http://www.jneuroinflammation.com/content/5/1/12

    I think its safe to say I wouldn't read much into this yet. How many times has medicine been burned by animal studies and other type of non-randomized lower quality studies in the past, only to have well done follow-up studies disprove the originals.

    1. Re:for the scientifically minded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      12 times. Yup, 12

    2. Re:for the scientifically minded by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

      How many times has medicine been burned by animal studies and other type of non-randomized lower quality studies in the past, only to have well done follow-up studies disprove the originals. 7?
    3. Re:for the scientifically minded by TerribleNews · · Score: 1

      I think its safe to say I wouldn't read much into this yet. How many times has medicine been burned by animal studies and other type of non-randomized lower quality studies in the past, only to have well done follow-up studies disprove the originals.

      Ah, but it doesn't MATTER if there are follow up studies that completely disprove this one. The idea that coffee prevents Alzheimers is now ingrained in Common Knowledge. Most people are not scientifically minded, they're media spoon-fed mush-brains.

      Frankly, if people have been doing it for hundreds of years (drinking coffee, drinking wine, eating beef, as a few examples) then a new study where they swabbed something on a rabbit isn't going to make me change my behaviour.

    4. Re:for the scientifically minded by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Nor should it make you change your behavior, BUT not because of your 'people have been doing it for a long time' logical fallacy, but because it's ONLY one study.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Can't drink just one by ATestR · · Score: 1

    Its like the old potato chip commercial... one cup of coffee may be good for you. I just have a hard time stopping after drinking only one. And drinking 6 - 8 cups of day is baaaaad for you (or so I've heard).

    --
    âoeAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
  17. Slashdot geeks by denzacar · · Score: 1

    The BCC has a story that many Slashdot geeks will be happy to hear Did the study take into account all that sex rabbits usually have?
    I have a feeling deep down that something like that might have a profound effect on the brain.

    And sadly... I doubt Slashdot geeks could compete with rabbits on that front, even if The Management apparently hopes othervise, featuring these new adds and all...
    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  18. More research needed? by benwiggy · · Score: 1

    More research is needed to test the effect on humans. Yes, if only you could persuade a reasonable sample of the world's population to drink coffee.

    For this you get funding?
    1. Re:More research needed? by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 1

      The hard part is getting a representative sample of the world's population to accurately tell you how much coffee they drink - then to find them all again in 40 years to see how many got dementia.

    2. Re:More research needed? by benwiggy · · Score: 1

      Or to see how many of those can remember how much coffee they had.

    3. Re:More research needed? by GWLlosa · · Score: 1

      The trouble is that this is a self-fulfilling prophecy. If you round up the elderly population, and ask them all how much coffee they've drunk in the past, the ones who have Alzheimer's will say, "I've never had coffee, I'm sure I'd remember something like that!"

  19. A ha! by invisibleairwaves · · Score: 2, Funny

    The secret to the energizer bunny's longevity revealed!

  20. Offtopic, I admit, but... by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I couldn't help but think of Hans Reiser when I first noticed that ad.

  21. I used to buy Dunkin Donuts by NJVil · · Score: 1

    until I realized how much it was costing me a month... and perhaps more importantly, I did a little bit of research and found out which company owns Dunkin Donuts. The latter was pretty much the nail in the coffin, and even though I live one block away from a Dunkin Donuts, I have not been there in quite some time.

    1. Re:I used to buy Dunkin Donuts by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      > I did a little bit of research and found out which company owns Dunkin Donuts. The latter was pretty much the nail in the coffin ...

      What's so bad about Dunkin' Brands that you can't have a donut & coffee?

    2. Re:I used to buy Dunkin Donuts by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Well, do tell? Who owns Dunkin Donuts?

    3. Re:I used to buy Dunkin Donuts by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Bah, I don't care, I prefer Tim Hortons anyway.

    4. Re:I used to buy Dunkin Donuts by NJVil · · Score: 1

      If you're familiar with the Carlyle Group, depending on your political affiliation and attitude toward the Carlyle Group's past behaviors, you might not want to be voluntarily supporting them with your hard-earned money. I've chosen not to.

    5. Re:I used to buy Dunkin Donuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...I did a little bit of research and found out which company owns Dunkin Donuts.

      Err... could you clarify this? Dunkin' Donuts is owned by a company called "Dunkin' Brands Inc", a link that seems harmless and straightforward enough. The latter company is owned by a consortium of private investment firms: Bain Capital, the Carlyle Group, and Thomas H. Lee Partners. Do you have something against one of these investment firms? It's not immediately apparent what that might be. I have to assume that one of them has invested in something you disagree with -- your post would be more clear and interesting if you spelled it out, though, I think.
    6. Re:I used to buy Dunkin Donuts by reverius · · Score: 1

      I assume it's related to this.

  22. What drinks have the most caffiene? by schwit1 · · Score: 1
    If the caffeine from one cup of is good, 10 must be better.


    "Lousy American coffee couldn't keep a hamster up at night!"

  23. Eh.... by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

    What's up doc?

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  24. You wrecked it! ;) by newr00tic · · Score: 0

    Wow, you managed to fsck the design up, (atleast here.) - Please be makink komments on Digg, kthnx'ink ;)

    (To *wreck* Digg, you unimaginative clods.)

    --
    A horse can't be sick, you know, even if he wants to.
    1. Re:You wrecked it! ;) by Kozz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please be makink komments on Digg, kthnx'ink ;)

      Pitr, is that beink you?

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
  25. Makes a kind of sense. by Samurai+Cat! · · Score: 1

    My 82 yr old dad suffers from dementia and Alzheimer's, and I can't recall him being a coffee drinker.

    (sips on my morning cuppa whilst typing this)

    --

    "People" using "unnecessary" quotes should be "shot".
    1. Re:Makes a kind of sense. by Dilpo · · Score: 1

      You know both of my grandparents on one side of my family are very active, alert, and otherwise don't seem to be showing any signs of Alzheimer's or dementia. They also happen to own 50 cats. Following your logic it makes sense that the cats must be warding off these diseases!

    2. Re:Makes a kind of sense. by dotancohen · · Score: 3, Funny

      My 82 yr old dad suffers from dementia and Alzheimer's, and I can't recall him being a coffee drinker. If you can't recall it, maybe you've proved the genetic link.
      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  26. tttooo mmmuuuccchhh cccaaaffffffiiinnnee by UberHoser · · Score: 1

    iiisss iiittt mmmeee ooorrr iiisss ttthhheee ssscccrrreeeeeennn jjjuuummmpppiiinnnggg aaarrrooouuunnnddd tttoooooo mmmuuuccchhh ?

    --
    Guns are for wimps... Use a crossbow.. this way you can pin them to their chair when you go postal.
  27. At Least I will be OK by kwrxxx · · Score: 0

    With as much caffeine as I drink in a day I should be OK until I'm 100!

  28. I don't think I buy it by wwphx · · Score: 1

    but would love to be proved wrong. 3/4ths of my dad's sisters have Alzheimers and all are/were coffee drinkers. It could be that we are the exception to the rule and coffee wouldn't make a diff, but I have first-hand evidence otherwise. On my wife's side, her mom just turned 80 with no evidence of Alzheimer's or dementia, her father died of cancer near his 80's also mentally sharp, and they are/were both fairly heavy coffee drinkers, but they're also Scottish, so that's a bit of a variable.

    Personally, I don't like the taste of the stuff, though I do have bottles of Starbucks Frapp in my fridge at work.

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    1. Re:I don't think I buy it by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      I drink my coffee black, no sugar, no cream, just pure coffee (and water). I can't stand most of the stuff they sell at Starbucks, Tim Hortons, or any other well known coffee establishment. Which is why the "Double Double" is so popular at Tim Hortons. Load it down with cream and sugar, so you can't taste how burnt it is. Good coffee should be able to be drank black, without tasting bad. I'm not a coffee connoisseur by any stretch of the imagination. But it's a pretty sad state of affairs when Nabob made at home in your Sunbeam coffee maker tastes many times better then the most popular coffee shops.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:I don't think I buy it by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      Starbucks coffee is shite, and to quote Dennis Leary, You can get every other flavor except COFFEE FLAVORED COFFEE!

      I stopped buying the coffee shop coffee, now I'm sipping a cup of homemade before heading to the office.

      One exception though- if you are ever in Park City, try the coffee shop at the lodge. It's amazing.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    3. Re:I don't think I buy it by spikedvodka · · Score: 2, Informative

      Let me tell you, I love my aeropress - easy, fast, and makes the best damn coffee I've ever had.

      it uses more grounds than drip, but day-amn it's worth it

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
  29. As Paul Erdos said... by Woodpeckeruk · · Score: 1

    Mathematicians are machines for turning caffeine into theorems. Looks like he may be proved right. Mind you, he also used a lot of speed as well. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Man-Who-Loved-Only-Numbers/dp/1857028295/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1207226895&sr=8-1

  30. unfiltered coffee and cholesterol by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

    As a side note, unfiltered coffee contains amounts of the worst kind of cholesterol. So use a paper filter and you should be good to go.

    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    1. Re:unfiltered coffee and cholesterol by RockModeNick · · Score: 1

      Unfiltered coffee also contains more oils which will make it taste bitter, an even better reason.

  31. A single factor of many by athloi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Coffee helps protect against dementia.

    But, it leeches calcium from your bones.

    Still, it avoids erectile dysfunction.

    However, it destroys a good night's sleep.

    Yet it can keep you thin.

    But, it might make you take up smoking...

    And so on, forever and ever, until people admit that even scientists recognize the world is more complicated than a single factor at a time.

    1. Re:A single factor of many by Angvaw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Caffeine can help your brain...Caffeine can cause hypertension.
      Water can quench your thirst...Water can drown you.
      A hammer can be used to put together a shelf...A hammer can be used to bash in your skull.

      WTF, first you said they're good, and then you said they'e bad! Science is a load of BS!!

    2. Re:A single factor of many by Serge_Tomiko · · Score: 0

      Nothing "leeches" calcium from your bones. Calcium really has just two big functions in your body

      1) Your heart,and some other muscles, contract by deporting calcium from cells. If there is too much calcium in your blood, you end up with elevated blood levels of calcium. This is unlikely to happen because

      2) Osteoblast cells in your bones create and maintain the bone structure. When you are youngish, your body removes excess calcium by strengthening your bones. People who consume too much calcium build too much bone mass early in life. Like all cells, osteoblast cells have a fixed life. After a certain number of cell divisions, that's it. You're done. For people who consume diets with milk products, this happens at a much earlier point in life. Thus, osteoporosis is very common in places like Scandanavia, but virtually unknown amongst the poor in places like China. The same is true for disorders like kidney stones. Older people who have consumed dairy products throughout their lives no longer have osteoblast cells in abundance, and the kidneys are the main way excess calcium is removed (thus keeping your heart beating).

      Coffee has nothing to do with this process. You want strong bones throughout your life? Don't consume dairy products or take calcium supplements. It's that simple.

    3. Re:A single factor of many by whovian · · Score: 1

      Owner: Take this object, but beware it carries a terrible curse!
      Homer: [worried] Ooooh, that's bad.
      Owner: But it comes with a free Frogurt!
      Homer: [relieved] That's good.
      Owner: The Frogurt is also cursed.
      Homer: [worried] That's bad.
      Owner: But you get your choice of topping!
      Homer: [relieved] That's good.
      Owner: The toppings contains Potassium Benzoate.
      Homer: [stares]
      Owner: That's bad.

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    4. Re:A single factor of many by whovian · · Score: 1

      This sounds interesting, but what about the following:

      1. Are there dietary factors or medications that impair or antagonize the function of osteoblasts? I can think of one: iron. Iron interferes with calcium absorption.

      2. Likewise, are there factors that agonize the fuction of osteoclasts (which break down bone)?

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    5. Re:A single factor of many by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "And so on, forever and ever, until people admit that even scientists recognize the world is more complicated than a single factor at a time."

      scientists know that, and work in the world where things are more complicated. It's one study, big deal. Only the media screws it up.

      BTW, having 1 cup in the morning would prevent all the 'problems' you present.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:A single factor of many by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Homer: "Can I go now?"

  32. I think I speak for all of us when I say... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    ... whatever. Give me my dose.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  33. My only problem is.. by funkdancer · · Score: 1

    .. how do you drink just one cup of coffee per day?

    --
    ISO certified == THX certified
    1. Re:My only problem is.. by emilper · · Score: 1

      use a very large cup ?

    2. Re:My only problem is.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I got down to a cup a week once. No Pro-plus or Red Bull substitution either.

      However I also developed an alcohol problem at the same time.

      Actually, I think the one dose of coffee had liqueur in it.

      Based upon my experiences, you should drink lots of coffee to prevent alcoholism.

  34. What's this about? by electricbern · · Score: 1

    Was this study funded by Starbucks? Are they trying a Marketing strategy aiming at the rabbit-population niche? It is known to be an exponentially increasing population.

    --
    alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
  35. The world is not black and white by __aailob1448 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Opium was used as a treatment for disentery, arsenic for leukemia, nitroglycerin for some heart problems.

    The bottom line is everything can potentially be a cure or a poison depending on proportion (Even water can be a mortal poison).

    The truth is that we still suck when it comes to nutritional science. Mostly because it's hard to do proper science when your subject lives as long as you do.

    1. Re:The world is not black and white by emilper · · Score: 1

      Nicotinic acid is still sold in pharmacies (sometimes called vitamin PP - Pellagra Preventive).

      Strychnine too is sold in pharmacies, injectable I think.

      Curara (also spelled curare) was used for stomach problems, as long as one did not have an ulcer and it did not get into the blood stream directly.

      All plants are at least a bit toxic, that's why most of them have to be cooked, or have the outer skin removed, or can be eaten only when they are very young, or only when ripe etc.

      I am tired of being told that "this is bad for your health" and 'that is good for your health" ... I want my coffee black, my steak medium-rare and the omelet with cheese and lots of bacon. The miserabilists/calorie counters can go and attempt to manage somebody's else life.

    2. Re:The world is not black and white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is that we still suck when it comes to nutritional science. Mostly because it's hard to do proper science when your subject lives as long as you do. And quack diets (e.g. Atkins, Ornish) will continue to exploit our less-than-complete knowledge about nutrition to promote their bullshit. Quacks: "The experts" have been "proven wrong," but our testimonials prove that low-carb (or vegan) diets are superior.
    3. Re:The world is not black and white by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The truth is that we still suck when it comes to nutritional science. Mostly because it's hard to do proper science when your subject lives as long as you do.


      don't assume that *everyone* sucks at nutrition just because everyone you know sucks at nutrition. btw, excellent observation - most folks don't even realize how bad nutritional advise is or that very little data, if any, actually supports most recommendations.

      there is one guy who has gotten it right (dr. barry sears, phd lipid researcher) and one high profile organization that has finally caught on and began recommending his zone diet (harvard medical school's joslin diabetes center).

      the results of this diet are astounding.

      1. stanford swimmer won 16 gold medals in two olympics following this diet.
      2. dara torres set the 50m free american record in 2007 - as a 40 year old! she won the 50m and 100m at the us nationals. look for dara to compete in the 2008 olympics as a 41 year old.
      3. the two female athletes with the most olympic medals *in modern day olympic history, all sports included* are both zoners.
      4. the female with the most gold medals on the planet is a zoner.
      5. the oldest swimmer to make the us olympic has been a zoner for the last 4 olympics - 1992, 1996, 2000 and 2004. each year was a different swimmer - so you can exclude "freak athlete" as the cause. dara will almost assuredly make the team and reset the bar ro 41 years old - and make the streak 5 straight olympics.
      6. manuel uribe has a near perfect lipid profile at almost 800 lbs - he used to weigh in at 1230 lbs just over 2 years ago. his depression and hunger are gone.
      7. bet you didn't know the italian national basketball team that came from nowhere to beat the american nba stacked basketball team by 17 points and win the 2004 silver medal were also zoners.

      so much more to tell, but you can figure it out through your own research.

      this is a good starting point:

      http://www.drsears.com/ZoneResources/tabid/384/Default.aspx

      save the pdf linked to by the Anti-Inflammatory Medicine Monograph and read through it.

      investigate further and amazing things will happen for you the same way they happened for me.

      1. lost 20 net lbs in 6 months (currently 160 lbs).
      2. lost 4" off waist in 6 months (currently 32").
      3. dropped from 20% body fat to 11% in 9 months.
      4. went from 10 lb flies x 15 to benching 200 lbs x 1 in 9 months.
      5. easily progressing 5 lbs every 21 days - about twice as fast as when i was 20 (i'm in my 40s now).
      6. 95% of my allergies are gone.
      7. i haven't called in sick in 12+ months for the first time in my work life (over 20 years).
      8. I enjoy cardio for the first time in my life.
      9. i feel better, have more energy and suffer less hunger than at any time in my life.
      10. tg/hdl 1
      11. i love my diet - i eat good foods, i feel better than ever and i'm gaining muscle while losing excess fat.
      12. all this on less than 2k calories a day.

      you can have similar results, too. perhaps better. maybe much better. i assure you, i am not genetically blessed. all th ebove are results of the best diet known to man on a below average genetic specimen.
  36. exercise by dpilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is in fact a body of knowledge that says that exercise itself is good for the brain's health, and preventing dementia.

    Back on the "all things in moderation" kick, exercise certainly seems to be one of them, but in this case I think "moderation" for exercise is indeed a higher dose than most of us consider. I've heard that marathons are actually hard on the body, and shouldn't be done too often, and I suspect that hard-core bodybuilding is a bit much, but most of us never really approach excessive exercise.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:exercise by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

      Actually, running (like many aerobic sports) places a HUGE impact on the knees, which is why many seasoned marathon runners tend to have knee issues as they age. I've had friends quit the sport for this precise reason.

      There are lower-impact sports, such as cycling, that can be done in large quantities of time without significant damage. However, doing too much of those will present their issues as well...

    2. Re:exercise by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 4, Funny

      "There are lower-impact sports, such as cycling"

      Ah, but the trade-off there is that you have to wear those fruity little pants. No thanks, I'll risk the knee injuries.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:exercise by dpilot · · Score: 1

      > Actually, running (like many aerobic sports) places a HUGE impact on the knees, which is
      > why many seasoned marathon runners tend to have knee issues as they age. I've had friends
      > quit the sport for this precise reason.

      At work, many of us take a bit of a walk after lunch. (No small number of times, I've had the solution to some work-related problem or other pop into my head during/after these walks, so IMHO they're a good thing.) I had one friend quit the lunchtime walks, because he knew his knee lifetime was limited, and he wanted to save it for training/running marathons.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    4. Re:exercise by TigerNut · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Runner's World says (and an increasing number of over-60 runners bears this out) that Running Is Good For You. Good for your bones, because your bone density doesn't reduce as much. Good for your muscles, because if you don't use them, you lose them. Good for your joints, because the impact of running (in moderation) keeps things lubricated. And also good for your brain because exercise releases endorphins and other hormones that keep things in balance.

      The problem is that folks generally have this view that they could never run a marathon, so why run at all (extend that to any given sport)? The answer is to recognize that pretty much anyone can improve their fitness from where it's at today, and it's amazing to see how quickly the body can become accustomed to an increased level of activity, so long as the increase is kept within reasonable bounds. Being more fit makes just about every daily activity more fun and less stressful, and it amazes me that in so many of the 'self-help' TV shows that are on the tube these days, they turn to surgery for what is really just a lack-of-exercise problem.

      --

      Less is more.

    5. Re:exercise by apt142 · · Score: 1

      I actually have a pair of foam nunchucks in my office (couldn't bring the real ones in.) I pick them up when I'm trying to solve a difficult problem.

      There's something about physical activity that just sort of relaxes the brain into a solution.

    6. Re:exercise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never heard anyone suggest that avoiding walking was good for your joints. Seems to me that sitting all day everyday, then running a marathon would be way worse than walking every day then running a marathon. Kind of like letting an engine sit in a garage for months then firing it up and doing the Indy 500.

    7. Re:exercise by MojoStan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, running (like many aerobic sports) places a HUGE impact on the knees, which is why many seasoned marathon runners tend to have knee issues as they age. I've had friends quit the sport for this precise reason. Personal anecdote: I quit "running" and started "jogging" (while still getting the benefits of aerobic exercise). Seriously, just changing my mindset from "training for competition" to "excercising for my long-term health" changed my life for the better. Ever since I slowed down my pace and stopped trying to get faster, I haven't had any serious injuries and I've stayed in shape year-round. When I was a "runner," I would occasionally have to deal with shin splints, ankle sprains, and burn-out. As a "jogger," I cover more miles than I did as a runner but I no longer have these running-related injuries and problems.

      As a former competitive high school runner (cross country and track), it was mentally tough for me to slow down and jog. I imagine it's tough for many males to accept being passed by a female runner or some shirtless dude that you know can't beat you in a race. Just remind yourself that you aren't training for anything. You're exercising for your health. "Miles per week" is what's important, not "how fast" you're running.

      Of course, my testimonial doesn't mean "jogging" will work for everybody that's having problems with running. However, I think many runners (especially guys) need to just slow the frick down if they're getting running-related injuries.

      --
      TO START
      PRESS ANY KEY

      Where's the 'ANY' key? I see Esk, Kitarl, and Pig-Up...

    8. Re:exercise by tixxit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Marathon running can definitely mess up your knees, but there is a big difference between doing 30+km runs, and 5km runs. Pretty much any exercise in that amount of excess is going to be bad for you. We just weren't made for it. Going for a 30min jog a few times a week is just fine. Just stick to soft surfaces, and keep a comfortable pace.

  37. BUNNIES SCIENTIFIC FACTS by The+Redster! · · Score: 2, Funny

    *looks at coffee cup*

    ...

    "Daaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah!!"

    (Bunnies can't do scientific research)

    (but - THEY - CAN - DANCE)

  38. Rabbits by sskagent · · Score: 1

    Its a good thing all /. readers are rabbits, so this data is useful. Because otherwise.......I'd be RTFA for nothing

  39. Recommended daily allowance? by Samedi1971 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought my rabbit was going to be perfectly healthy on a diet of hay and fresh greens. How many cups of coffee should he be drinking daily to be safe?

    Adopt a rabbit!

    1. Re:Recommended daily allowance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop testing on rabbits and start adopting them.

      O

    2. Re:Recommended daily allowance? by jamie · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Recommended daily allowance? by Samedi1971 · · Score: 1

      Is Grace a Rex? She seems to have that soft, short hair of a Rex.

      Here's mine.

      Harley shares Grace's views on buying Easter bunnies. We think he started life as one, but when we adopted him it was just guessed at based on his age. Now he lives the good life and doesn't ever have to hide eggs.

    4. Re:Recommended daily allowance? by jamie · · Score: 1

      Yep, she's a Rex. Very soft, very opinionated.

  40. I, for one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new coffee drinking bunny overlords.

  41. Sure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't believe this. Interesting to see which wires will pick this story up.

    Thanks for pointing out the side effects BBC !!

  42. hate to be the grammar nazi here... by arclyte · · Score: 1

    I just feel I have to point out that you misspelled a key word in the summary. You wrote "coffee" while everyone here knows that it is spelled "mountain dew".

  43. I eat nothing but cardboard boxes... by AioKits · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and have coffee in the morning, water in the afternoon and vodka in the evening! I'm healthy as a horse! Save for the fact I now get erections when I walk by cardboard boxes...

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  44. Awesome I love Caffeine, one Caffeine Drink a day by wastedbrains · · Score: 1

    If you want to find new drinks I actually drink one new energy drink almost every day and review them. I am actually up to over 200 reviews. I just never liked coffee but need caffeine through out college to stay up and study (CS major), so I started trying every Energy drink I could find to see if I liked some, and my hobby was born. My 200+ Energy Drink Reviews

    --
    Dan Mayer: my blog, essays, art, etc
  45. Cue Louis Black by JaBob · · Score: 1

    This made me jump to Louis Black's rant on eggs... "...What about eggs? Now they're saying eggs are bad for you. ... First they were bad, then they were good... then the yolks were bad but the *stammers* MAKE UP YOUR MIND!! It's breakfast and I gotta eat..." Seriously. I have a family history of diabetes, heart disease, cancer, and depression. I used to be all kinds of concerned with my health and how I should treat myself so I used to read magazines like Men's Health and others, as well as check out what the web said about other health issues. I used to worry about what kind of exercise I was or wasn't getting. I used to really worry about the kind of crap I was eating or if I was getting all the vitamins and whatnot that I should've. I had my subscription for something like 6 years or so, but I quit worrying about that when I used to notice patterns that whatever advice anyone anywhere would ever give, someone else would contradict that later on. I don't have a photogenic memory but I would remember enough to realize this, and so I basically said fuck it... whoever said it first had it right when they said 'almost everything is good in moderation.' Now you can read all kinds of articles on how good fermented beverages are good for you and how they are bad and blah blah blah. Well there's few things that should not be done in moderation (modern refined street drugs for one), but everything else should be handled reasonably well by most people in moderation, but YMMV. Just don't go overboard on any one thing and you should be OK.

    1. Re:Cue Louis Black by ryszard99 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a photogenic memory but I wo
      I dont have a photogenic memory either. come to think of it, i wouldnt even know where to begin photgraphing my memory.. :-)
      --
      -- $_='ab-bc ratvarre';tr"'a-z'"'n-za-m'";print
    2. Re:Cue Louis Black by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      At least Louis Black isn't changing every week--he sucks now, he sucked last week, and he's always sucked. The "pissed off guy shouting about stuff" routine gets really old after you finish 9th grade.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
  46. Hmm... Someone upstairs should listen to you... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...and get some advertisements for lawyer services to go with the above mentioned Russian brides add.
    You know... for prenuptial agreements, possible run-ins with Russian and international law enforcement, child custody, possible indictments of murdering your spouse...

    Just in case...

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  47. Statins? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the huge amounts of coffee I drink is offsetting the effects of the statin drug I take which is apparently working hard to make me stupid.

  48. Daily Quart Of Ethanol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Protects the remainder of my brain.

    Criminally Forever,
    George W. Bush

  49. A blood supply of rabbits?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    FTA:

    A vital barrier between the brain and the main blood supply of rabbits fed a fat-rich diet was protected in those given a caffeine supplement. I don't really understand. I didn't know blood had a supply of rabbits which was somehow blocked by a brain barrier... So, we need to drink coffee in order to protect our blood supply of fat-rich rabbits? But what about the people who don't have a blood supply of fat-rich rabbits? I'm a vegetarian, and eating rabbit is a no-go for me, even if they're mostly fat and little meat.
  50. I have seen a living testimony for this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My Grand Pa is almost 90 yrs old, in sound mind and health and is on his way to outlive all his children. He is well versed in Philosophy and can eloquently talk to you for hours on the end, keeping you engaged at the same time. What is more notable is that his interest in Philosopy came about after he retired at 65!!!!

    His secret? 9 cups of coffee a day till a few years ago. And loads of veggies and fruits
    every day.

    -Anon

  51. Works on bunnies eh? by Assassin+bug · · Score: 1

    Well what about this bunny

  52. Caffeine, not necessarily coffee by AJWM · · Score: 1

    Personally, I don't like the taste of the stuff,

    The study talks about caffeine, not coffee. They didn't get the rabbits to drink coffee, just gave them caffeine (the BBC summary doesn't explain how).

    Plenty of sources of caffeine. If you really don't want to take it in a drink, just pick up a package of "Wake Ups" or "NoDoz" -- caffeine pills equivalent to a cup of strong coffee each. I used to take those for long all-night driving trips when I didn't want to drink that much coffee or caffeinated soda.

    --
    -- Alastair
    1. Re:Caffeine, not necessarily coffee by wwphx · · Score: 1

      Good point. I've never taken pills like that before, so it had not entered my realm of consideration.

      My wife enjoys reading medical studies. I was telling her about this and she was saying that the study that reported benefits for Parkinsons sufferers required a pretty significant intake of coffee, on the order of 5-8 cups a day. I have no idea what that would translate to as pills.

      My problems with the pills is the thought of the jitters. I've had medically-induced jitters due to an accidental OD of pharmaceuticals and it was no fun, I can't imagine what taking a dozen (or however many) caffeine pills a day would be like.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  53. So then, really... by Tarlus · · Score: 1

    "Daily Caffeine Protects Rabbits' Brains"

    Dunno about anyone else here, but I'm at least fairly certain that I'm not a rabbit...

    --
    /* No Comment */
  54. typo by XnPlater · · Score: 1

    it's 6 parts not 5.

    me: "Scotty, I need more coffee!"
    Scotty: "Sorry capt'n, you cannae take it anymore!"

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
  55. I don't believe this anyway by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    My mother-in-law is now several years into serious Alzheimer's, and she drank coffee every day of her adult life. Same with my paternal grandfather... he was diagnosed with it before he died, and he was a heavy coffee drinker.

    I've been suspicious of the "Food X has effect Y on people" studies since the 90's, when we found out that all of those "bran can prevent cancer" studies were essentially bullshit. Followup studies showed that the only thing all of those people got out of eating millions of bran muffins in the 80's was tasteless food.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  56. Is it wrong to torture others? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see nobody here has even begun to contemplate the pain and suffering of the rabbits involved in this blatantly fraudulent 'research'.
    Yet another useless series of experiments, performed on FEELING beings, otherwise known as animals, and all the comments here are basically "How does this affect ME?".

    Perhaps you could explain to yourselves how you CHOSE to be born as human beings, and not as animals.

    This 'research' will result in absolutely nothing. No cures for humans.
    The ONLY thing that brings about cures in humans is HUMAN research. Of course, you'll say "It's wrong to experiment on humans" - but we ALREADY experiment on humans - it's called 'clinical trials'.

    92% of drugs FAIL clinical trials - human experiments - after 'passing' animal experiments. Which proves that animal 'research' doesn't predict human outcomes, and is therefore a huge fraud.

    So before you carry on bullshitting about whether this 'research' affects YOU or not, look at the whole picture- the sort of evil psychopaths who get off on torturing animals all day, are also the same people who couldn't give a toss whether they were finding a 'cure' or not - they know they're too stupid to find a cure, so they carry on with their 'research' and their jobs for life- imagine that - getting paid for FAILING at your job.

  57. Where can PETA... by dotancohen · · Score: 1

    Where can the PETA crowd now buy coffee that hasn't been tested on rabbits?

    --
    It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  58. It's Comedy... relax by JaBob · · Score: 1

    Sheesh... comedy is comedy... so you don't like the guy's style. You think that his delivery is juvenile. Maybe you also don't like George Carlin because of his language, or Richard Pryor because of his drug use, Carlos Mencia because of his blatant use of the race card, or Robin Williams because of the sometimes incoherent nature of his presentation. To me comedy comes in many forms - and it's purpose is to shed light on some of those peculiarities of human nature. I would never do or say half the things I have ever heard in comedy routines, but they do poke fun at some of my insecurities and values and make me learn a little bit more about myself. Maybe it's because I've never been very social and that since some of the comedy stuff echoes what I experience, it's a way of feeling less alone or knowing that other people have the same insecurities. Or maybe it's just that people have different tastes and I don't really give a flying fuck what someone on the internet says (because here everyone's important and their opinion is law.) They have experienced things that I may never in my life get to, so I will take any chance to learn about things I may never be exposed to. I like talking to the diverse group of people that I meet - It feels good knowing that no matter what walk of life you come from, there's things that tie us all together.

  59. Bad today, good tomorrow!? by KWTm · · Score: 1

    Just make up your fucking minds already, every other week coffee is bad, then good, then bad again.
    Reminds me of that article in The Onion that basically said: "Eggs don't cause cancer ... this week. So eat some now before they're found to cause cancer next week!"
    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  60. Note by geekoid · · Score: 1

    1 cup of coffee, not a frigging desert poised as a 'coffee'

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  61. Coffee Emergency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shameless plug for my favorite roaster:

    Coffee Emergency

    I recommend the Code Brown espresso if espresso's your thing. I also just scored a 5lb. bag of the Guatemalan Huehuetenango for about $7/lb., and I can definitely recommend that too. And if they ever offer a Yemen Mohka Ismaili again, you'd better get your order in quickly before I buy it all up.

    Protects your brain, maybe. Makes your dick bigger, definitely not. Pleases the taste buds, absolutely.

  62. Rabbits, dementia... by Hucko · · Score: 1

    Ummm... how do you know when rabbits have dementia?

    --
    Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  63. Good thing old people drink coffee by DECS · · Score: 1

    Right, because all of the people suffering from dementia today didn't drink coffee every day.

    That's all they drank! That's all there was in the 40s!

    Who pays for this kind of research, and why don't they have a subscription to any sort of reality?

    Five Factors Shifting the Future of Malware and Platform Security

  64. Re:I have seen a living testimony against this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My dad drank coffee all the time. He is now pushing 80 and suffers from the same dementia that clouded his mother and probably every generation of my family going back through time.

    I am no doubt fated to run into the same problems when I get older (and sometimes worry that I'm getting close). All of these people drank copious amounts of coffee.

    I have an IQ of 148. My dad seemed awfully sharp and perceptive too. Until genetics and perhaps environmental factors destroyed his brain. Now he's easily confused and doesn't always know what's going on around him. My grandmother would leave the house hoping to walk to the old farm she lived in, without knowing where it actually was. Coffee didn't do anything to fix their problems.

  65. Make each of 6 pens touch the other 5 by KWTm · · Score: 1

    Arrange two pens to touch at the tips, forming an acute angle between them (say, 30 degrees). Insert the third pen to nestle into the angle, touching both of the other pens. Now these three pens form a sort of arrow-shaped formation and are almost parallel (within, say, 30 degrees).

    Arrange the fourth, fifth, and sixth pens the same way, and lay them on top of the first three pens in an orthogonal direction, so that the "arrow" formed by the 4th, 5th, and 6th pens is perpendicular to that formed by the first three pens.

    Then post on Slashdot in a smug manner.

    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]
  66. Stardrop on caffeine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually, one of my favorite comic strips happens to be about caffeine this week.

  67. Re: Your Sig by zsau · · Score: 1

    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now. ... but if I can see the message, you can't be moderating in this article! Not much of a reign of terror, surely, is it?

    --
    Look out!
  68. Re: Your Sig by aurispector · · Score: 1

    You comments have been noted. In fact I have 10 shiny new mod points just waiting for you, "zsau" and it will be easy to find you on another thread....MUAHAHAHAHA!!!

    --
    I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
  69. God damn grumpy mods by Neuticle · · Score: 1

    Once again, some humorless douche gets mod points and has to strike down a joke as "off-topic"...

    A joke referencing the parent or GP is hardly off-topic*, but good jorb there Mr. Grumpy-moderator, burning someones karma for honestly trying to be funny. We can't let people go about doing that on our "serious and mature" forum, can we?

    COME ON people! This is a Slashdot posting about caffeine we're commenting on, not a forum on some scholarly article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science. This sort of anti-humor modding seems to be happening way too often lately; it's like there is some crusade to make Slashdot "serious"

    If you don't like the Slash-humor, ignore it, or move to an actual "serious" forum. Otherwise, try to mod-UP the comments you actually like. If you must mod people down to validate your self-worth, there are plenty of actual trolls lurking about. Heck, just pick one of twitter's sock-puppets and you can have a full-time job modding down (or up, if you like him).

    /Off soap-box
    //Blow another point modding me down if you want
    ///Blow me

    *I can see modding it redundant if the joke had been made many, many times over, but this was the second time.

    --
    "Cheeze it!" - Bender
    1. Re:God damn grumpy mods by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      I just wish people would stop complaining at the first innapropriate mod. Look, your comment is 20 minutes older than the parent, and a couple of hours later, it was already at 'Funny' which is appropriate.

      Not specifically aimed at you, it is just something I observed the past few weeks. There may be inappopriate mods, but they usually balance out in the end.

      Mart
      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    2. Re:God damn grumpy mods by Neuticle · · Score: 1

      Yes, things that get modded down when they shouldn't have often get corrective moderation later, but only if people notice them. It is all to common for something to get inappropriately modded down -1 and then languish at 1 or 0 without getting noticed, especially so the longer the thread has been up.

      Yes, I over-reacted a bit in my response. Here's why: I have mod points now and had been browsing threads at 1 and 0. I was frustrated in seeing so much purely anti-humor moderation and I didn't want to spend ALL my points just balancing out the Mr. Grumpys.

      My comment on the parent (at score:2) brought attention to the bad mod that might have been missed. Other people were nice enough to correct it (THANK YOU). Would it have been modded back up if I didn't respond? Who knows. I was tired of using my points for corrections only, and I wanted to blow off some steam.

      Hopefully people take the message to heart that Slashdot has never been, nor should it ever be, a "serious" place where jokes are to be looked down upon

      --
      "Cheeze it!" - Bender
    3. Re:God damn grumpy mods by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Totally agree with both your posts... come on, this is slashdot, not life or death. If you don't like the poster or the subject or disagree with what they say, ignore 'em and move on. No one ever died from reading a stupid joke on slashdot.

      I decided a long time ago, as a personal policy, that I would only mod up, never down. There are already enough self-righteous mod-warriors in the world.

      As to how this is relevant to the nominal topic, I submit that no one should use mod points prior to getting their daily caffeine injection, so they can actually understand the average /. post. ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  70. Prevent dementia! Invite strokes! by edunbar93 · · Score: 1

    And caffeine also has a nasty tendency towards increasing stress and blood pressure, increasing your risk of a stroke.

    Thank you and have a nice day.

    --
    "No problem. I have the capacity to do infinite work so long as you don't mind that my quality approaches zero."-Dilbert
  71. What me caffine by freedumb2000 · · Score: 1

    This reseach has been brought to proudly by: Folgers Coffe.

  72. Wait... is Alzheimer's Disease common... by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

    ...in rabbits? Do they just wander around wishing everyone a Merry Christmas?

  73. What about the German Super Rabbits? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean the world is now safe from marauding bands of demented rabbits?