Slashdot Mirror


The War Against Virtual Beer Pong

Michelle Shildkret, 360i on behalf of TIME.com writes "JV Games was all set to release 'Beer Pong' for the Nintendo Wii when parents and lawmakers got a whiff, forcibly renaming the game to Pong Toss and filling its pixelated cups with water instead. But the game is still rated 'T' for teen, and anybody who encounters it will be able to draw clear conclusions as to its intended purpose (drink and get drunk)." Lesson: Don't play games that simulate drinking before you play games that simulate driving, or larceny.

368 comments

  1. Beer Pong Video Game by jlarocco · · Score: 4, Insightful

    WTF? Just play real beer pong.

    1. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by nawcom · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't wait until they come out with the wii game where you play a drinking game where you drink if your character in the game your character is playing for drinks....erm.

    2. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      If you want to drink, just drink.
      Then you can play CoD4 and barf
      instead of wasting time on something pointless.

    3. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by seanonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      The War Against Virtual Beer Pong is actually a first-person shooter. It's the prequel to Duke Drinkem Forever.

    4. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by NoobixCube · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My friends and I, when I was living on campus, usually found the only real ping pong table already in use. Then, one of us got a Wii, and we played Wii Sports' Tennis as beer pong :P. Sure, there wasn't a glass to knock the ball into, but that didn't stop us getting more than a little tipsy :P

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    5. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by philspear · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sure, but what if I have no friends or it's like 10 AM and no one wants to start drinking?

      If I'm ACTUALLY playing one player beer pong, it's harder to lie to myself and say it's not just alchoholism.

    6. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Todd+Fisher · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's more environmentally friendly to play Beer Pong on the Wii - you only need one plastic cup.

      --


      --I'm not talking about dance lessons. I'm talking about putting a brick through the other guy's windshield.-
    7. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually your description of someone who got no REAL friends and no REAL partners to start to drink with him at 10 AM applies to pretty much all /.rs.
      No one here got REAL friends, except those dwarfs and elves in WoW, but they don't seem very real. The other people living on the basements with us are just imaginary...

    8. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by neuromancer23 · · Score: 0

      It's nice to know that in a time when the entire world is being overrun by nazi fucks bent on world domination, and the public is being mind-fucked at an unfathomable rate, at least we can count on Slashdot to keep us abreast of pertinent issues.

    9. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 2

      Or real golf, or real bowling, or real tennis...

      I'm just sayin'...

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    10. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Fozzyuw · · Score: 4, Funny

      I can't wait until they come out with the wii game where you play a drinking game where you drink if your character in the game your character is playing for drinks....erm.

      Just like been there... World of World of Warcraft!

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    11. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Looks like someone is noticing that "news for nerds" and "stuff that matters" are, shall we say, somewhat exclusive?

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    12. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Nirvelli · · Score: 1

      Just last Saturday I went to a party and watched some Beer Pong, and then I went over to the TV and watched some Beer Tanks.
      It was Wii Tanks, and the loser of each round took a drink.
      Moral of the story: People are already playing driking games with their Wiis; Wii Beer Pong would just make it more official.

      Me? I'm waiting for "Rockstar Table Tennis 2: Now With 100% More Beer Pong."

    13. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Lodragandraoidh · · Score: 1

      EverQuest had some potent ale that made your screen go psycodelic(sic) when your character drank enough of it. If you drank too much you would lose control of your character. It was also useful in the game to help Tanks during combat (more stamina???) - I wasn't a Tank - so I didn't really delve into the beneficial aspects of it.

      On several occasions I put on a drinking binge and ended up somewhere not where I started and couldn't figure out how I got there. Bad juju. That also happened to my character in EQ...

      --

      Lodragan Draoidh
      The more you explain it, the more I don't understand it. - Mark Twain
    14. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by sir+fer · · Score: 1

      while i don't agree with everything you said (I am a physicist who lives with my wife and child, my computer is in the lounge and I run my own company) a lot of the comments on /. reek of infantile, naive, stupidity. So much so that if one were to spend ones life correcting them all, one would never be finished (yes, assuming this was the last comment ever on /.). I find the level of ignorance here quite astounding considering who the site is aimed at.

      --
      Debian FTW ;o)
    15. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by neostorm · · Score: 1

      I was at a buddies house for a birthday party several years back, where I was introduced to beer pong. Said buddies house wasn't the most upkept bachelor pad, with two cats, a dog, and animal hair covering every surface.
      As we played this newfound sport to our hearts content, intoxicating ourselves the whole while, we noticed the steady buildup of animal hair on the pong balls. Every time a ball would miss it's mark, which became more and more frequent, whatever surface it touched that wasn't beer would wrap it nearly opaquely in a solid layer of discarded mammal insulation.
      Often times, far too often, the ball would bounce off of one of these surfaces immediately prior to landing in the cup full of delicious beverage, delivering a heaping amount of additional flavor to our consumables, as well as a nice, furry filter across the surface of the liquid.

      I think future games of beer pong will most likely be played in the virtual sense, for sake of sanity and hygiene.

      A shame about the censorship though.

    16. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by ResidntGeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're quite naive if you believe the self-deception of most nerds who think that playing D&D, watching anime, or using Linux implies, requires, or is correlated with general intelligence. You shouldn't find ignorance on slashdot surprising - it's common almost everywhere, no matter how knowledgeable people believe themselves to be.

      --
      ResidntGeek
    17. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      System Shock (1&2) had loads of this stuff. Cigarettes (aka coughing nails), boozes, drugs to inject to get you all weird. If you played it like me (non stop from start to end, eating only when i could find something in the game, sleeping with the game running, everything for immersion), and drank often ingame, to overcome the stress... it could get *really* crazy.... ehem... it GOT really crazy.

      Those were the good old times. My half plant half lion friends, the recreational deck, and every drug the (virtual) world had to offer. Loved those games like no other....

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    18. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by SL+Baur · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are actually drinking games in World of Warcraft. See http://www.worldofwarcraft.com/info/events/brewfest/

      Games include getting drunk in the various capital cities until you see pink elephants and advertising beer in Ironforge.

      Free virtual beer is served on New Years Eve as well.

    19. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      I find the level of ignorance here quite astounding considering who the site is aimed at.

      You must be new here.

    20. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Tejin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In World of Warcraft, alcohol makes it look like enemies are lower level than they really are. So a level 45 Crocolisk shows up as level 40 and you say to yourself "I can take 'im"

      --
      The seekers do no need truth, the seekers do find truth and the finding do be painful
    21. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd never heard of Beer Pong before this article. It sounds like a blast! I think I'll try it tonight...

    22. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's more environmentally friendly to play Beer Pong on the Wii - you only need one plastic cup.

      Especially if there are two girls, they can easily share one...
      no.. wait... I think that's going too far.

    23. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      WTF? Just play real beer pong.

      According to TFA, that, too, has been outlawed in various places and contexts...

      Oblig. XKCD

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    24. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by kalirion · · Score: 1

      No thanks, I do not want to drink out of a cup that a dirty ping pong ball has been in. I'm sorry, but the ball has been handled by several people and dropped on the ground multiple times, and ducking it in a bowl of water is not enough.

    25. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by PachmanP · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wii sports golf made the best Wii drinking game in my opinion. Drink for every point over par and every point you opponents were under par. Good times...

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    26. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      Gah you didn't learn to keep a cup of h2o by the beer to dip before every toss?

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    27. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by HungSoLow · · Score: 1

      Has anyone noticed the trend of a lot of video games, namely on the Wii? We have Rock Band and Guitar Hero, which takes a substatial amount of practice to do well - and just imagine if that time were put into learning a REAL instrument? Don't give me the bullshit of the positive effect of getting people together - I jam regularly with 4 people - the only tricky part is drums which will be solved when one of us gets a house. Then you have the Wii sports games - why not get out and visit a Golf course, or mini-putt? Anyone go bowling lately? Maybe it's just my in-laws and neighbours, but everyone seems to sit on their asses and / or not leave the house / apartment anymore.

    28. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Seriously, with only water and a little bit of cognitive dissonance beer pong is 100% hygienic.

      Besides, you'll be sick the next day regardless, so what does it matter?

    29. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Creepy · · Score: 1

      why?

      You can pop a pill for that.

      Now we just need beer pills and work pills and my life is complete...

    30. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No thanks, I do not want to drink out of a cup that a dirty ping pong ball has been in. I'm sorry, but the ball has been handled by several people and dropped on the ground multiple times, and ducking it in a bowl of water is not enough.

      Then it's clearly time you advanced to vodka pong.

    31. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned in college that you can't drink all day if you don't start in the morning.

    32. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You can pop a pill for that.

      Now we just need beer pills and work pills and my life is complete...

      In the year 3535
      Ain't gonna need to tell the truth, tell no lies
      Everything you think, do, and say
      Is in the pill you took today

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    33. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by retrospectacus · · Score: 1

      wtb mod point

    34. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't wait until they come out with the wii game where you play a drinking game where you drink if your character in the game your character is playing for drinks....erm.

      Just like been there... World of World of Warcraft!

      I can't wait until they come out with the wii game where you play a drinking game where you drink if your character in the game your character is playing for drinks....erm.

      Just like been there... World of World of Warcraft!

      Just like been there... World of World of Warcraft! Best regards

    35. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

      1) I don't have a good table
      2) I don't have enough cups
      3) Less mess
      4) Less space taken up

      Yeah...you're really insightful, what with all of your being able to clearly see why virtual beer pong isn't a half-bad idea. Ever been to a party where people are playing beer pong and some person, most likely drunk, has knocked into the pong table? Maybe you've never even been to a party, I don't know, but this is definitely a great game for drinking in a house with limited space and limited resources.

    36. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1) I don't have a good table
      2) I don't have enough cups
      3) Less mess
      4) Less space taken up

      Don't forget:

      5) I'm an asshat with no friends to play with

    37. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And don't anybody dare forget Second Second Life!

    38. Re:Beer Pong Video Game by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

      Oh, and lets see, the only time we've played "Pong Toss" so far is when our house was packed with...friends! How odd that we're social gamers and social drinkers...its like you're suggesting that drinking and gaming can't go hand-in-hand with having friends...which might hint that you're really the friendless one here.

  2. So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Because there sure seem to be quite a few of those.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    1. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just wait. Soon bars won't be allowed in games. If there's a bar (or worse, smoking) the game will get rated (AO) adults only.

      The new prohibition movement has already gotten smoking banned in bars and the "legally drunk" alcohol level has been changed from "actually drunk" to "imperfectly sober". They've done this even though the lower alcohol levels are not associated with a high risk of crashes. They can seize your car and sell it to fund their agencies though.

      The media war has already begun. PG-rated movies can't have smoking in them.

      A lot of people want the government to be your mom and make your choices for you. People vote for it because they think they're in the ruling class. When they find out they're actually "little people", it will be too late.

    2. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about the black choppers, you didn't mention the black choppers! They are coming for us all!

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    3. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Miseph · · Score: 1

      No, just you suckers who didn't vote for [insert candidate]like me!

      HAHAHAHA!

      Once we get rid of all you degenerates the world will be a better safer place and we can just quietly dismantle our black helicopter fleets and "re-education" centers (complete with eco-friendly bio-mass incinerators!). This plan can't possibly fail.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    4. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by afabbro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The new prohibition movement has already gotten smoking banned in bars and the "legally drunk" alcohol level has been changed from "actually drunk" to "imperfectly sober". They've done this even though the lower alcohol levels are not associated with a high risk of crashes. They can seize your car and sell it to fund their agencies though.

      Don't worry kid, by the time you're 25 you'll be partied out and vote for higher cigarette taxes and tougher drunk driving laws, too.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    5. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Jorophose · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Hey, now now.

      Smoking is a disgusting habit. Regardless of if it causes cancer or not, really, shit's plain nasty and you might as well stick a fork in an electrical outlet.

      While drinking beer, when you're ready to know and handle your limits, is very good for you, it keeps your system running clean. There is nothing wrong with non-alcoholic bars, either; Majora's Mask featured a Milk Bar, and Harvest Moon: A Wonderful Life has a non-alcoholic bar.

      Smoking in bars was a horrible idea. If I go into a bar it's for a few drinks with friends. It's not to get tar and various forms of AIDS in my lungs. You want to smoke? Do it at home pal. In exchange I, as an arsenist, won't light you on fire. Not only is it disgusting it smells, especially in clubs; cigarette smoke makes the entire place smells like ass, and with people sweating it's a disaster waiting to happen.

      PG-rated movies are intended for kids/early teens. You sure you want them smoking at that age? Smoking in movies only shows the "cool side". Yeah, looks pretty damn cool to smoke. 'til you see it in real life with people coughing up livers with yellow/blackening teeth.

      Saying smoking should be allowed in public places and in the media is like saying people with AIDS/HIV should be allowed to masturbate freely in public and are legally encouraged to rape everything they see.

      (but don't get me wrong. the less a government does past a few essential functions, the better.)

    6. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I believe the reason this was censored was that
      1. It emulates a game that involves real drinking as part of the rules so players are tempted to recreate that part (pretty easy, legal and fun).
      2. There is no way to enforce age limits for WiiWare downloads. No idea what the ESRB gave it but it might have been below the legal drinking age too and this game really shouldn't be sold below that.

      Had they let this go uncensored there'd be a news story about how "Nintendo makes underage children drink beer! OMG!" and I guess they'd rather see a story about censoring some game noone wants to buy anyway.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    7. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      The drinking level might be based more on psychology than real effect, people will often underestimate the alcohol they drank and a lower level will stop them earlier, preventing them from accidentally going over the real safe limit. Of course a limit of zero works best for that purpose, noone's going to dispute how many drinks you can have to be above that.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    8. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 2, Funny

      excuse me are you lost?

      --
      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
    9. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Knara · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While his screed does skew a little away into the Lone Gunmen territory, he is essentially correct. MADD et al have made it essentially illegal to do anything but stand in one place and drink, while the rest of the "think of the children" movement is continuing to try and make live as safe and sterile as possible in the US. MADD itself, as an organization, is quite insane and desperate to make itself continually relevant, leading to its metamorphosis into a neo-prohibitionist lobby group.

      Remember, just because someone sounds insane, doesn't mean that there isn't some truth there.

    10. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Being smug in bars was a horrible idea. If I go into a bar it's for a few drinks with friends. It's not to get banality and various forms of Self righteousness in my ears. You want to be smug? Do it at home pal. In exchange I, as an arsenist, won't light you on fire. Not only is it disgusting it smells, especially in clubs; smugness makes the entire place smell like ass, and with people sweating it's a disaster waiting to happen.

      Saying smugness should be allowed in public places and in the media is like saying people with AIDS/HIV should be allowed to masturbate freely in public and are legally encouraged to rape everything they see.

      There, Fixed that for you.

    11. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by matria · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Try working in a cancer research hospital's outpatient clinic for a couple of years; I did. I saw far too many people die (yes, die... I was the one who went around gathering their papers from the various doctors and clinic offices they'd been to, organizing their final records folder when they died) who never smoked themselves, but either a parent or a spouse did, or they were exposed in the workplace. And don't give me that crap about the air quality being worse than second-hand smoke. That's like saying kids can play in the street because more kids are killed in accidents at home.

      It's an addictive, dirty, poisonous drug that has no redeeming purpose whatsoever, and I have nothing but contempt for anyone who tries to trivialize or justify its use, let alone its being inflicted on everybody else.

    12. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Omestes · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm over 25, and I vote against EVERY vice law, since I find the very idea absurd. I'm not a libertarian (I'm a nutbag socialist, or moderate), and even I find that the government regulating my leisure activities absurd. If no one gets hurt, then it isn't their business.

      While the poster is probably wearing his tin-foil hat, I agree with the general premise, America is becoming more and more neo-Puritanical as time goes on. We've decided to all announce what we think would be good for others, and collectively vote for it, ignoring the fact that the simple answer is just not doing it ourselves (free will, and all that archaic baggage). And these self-righteous idiots don't even play a fair game, they resort to dirty tactics since "they know better" than the rest of us, it has become a game of the ends justifying the means, which is NEVER a good position.

      Looking at my home state, Arizona, which just banned all public smoking; some people put a sensable law on the ballots, banning it all non bar or bowling alley establishments (which still stretches things), and to fight this, another group (who I call niconazis) made another bill to ban it everywhere, period. This was not happenstance, it was a genuine political effort at confusion. A bar by my house found a loophole, and ran with it (with a couple million in lawyer fees), so the state decided to throw all their guns at it to make them comply, not just the legal ones. The received daily visits from the health department, and the liquor board, none of this was contained as a consequence of non-compliance with the law, it was just the state "out to get them" for not playing with the popular cause.

      As a note: I don't understand how the state can tell businesses how to run themselves. Let places decide if they want smoking (or drinking, even), or not, and let the market decide.

      This goes beyond the state level, the WHO frequently bans studies that find the link between second hand smoke and cancer negative or non conclusive, as do most modern Western health institutions. Its like an unpopular mirror of global warming. I, personally, think there is a link, but that still doesn't justify censorship of scientific studies that don't find things your way, and thus aren't allowed to be counted towards policy. (I also believe in global warming, and condemn all censorship that finds the opposite)

      As for drinking, we're approaching the same level of insanity. My friend almost got arrested once for WALKING to her car while intoxicated (0.08). She wasn't going to drive, she was getting a camera. The police didn't want to believe her. This was a bar that offered free cab rides home, and to the bar the next morning, so there wasn't even a reason she would have driven, not to mention she didn't even have her purse. The law also ignores that alcohol affects people differently. I can drink all night, have a high blood alcohol percentage, and not be affected, while others can be well under the legal limit and be severely impaired. Biological differences FTW.

      And then we bring on our war on boobs. We're an absurdly prudish and puritanical country. My mind boggles at the fact we find overt violence healthy for youth, but not natural biology. I almost got kicked out of college for mentioning the "nipples" on a nude bronze on campus, as it might offend someone. Everyone has them, how can it be offensive? I also almost became a registered sex offender in high school for saying something lewd to girl friend of mine (inside joke) and someone overheard it. If the target of the comment isn't offended, then how can a bystander who doesn't understand the context be?

      Its very odd, as we become more politically liberal, we become more culturally conservative. Look at the idiotic gay marriage debate for example... It makes no sense outside of a narrowly bigoted religious context (which most of my religious friends don't agree with, anecdotally), but still we are willing to regulate peoples bedroom life, and their rights based on who they want to practice these rights on. As long as no one is harmed, it isn't societies business.

      Sorry for the rant. Getting sick of idiocy today.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    13. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by wiz_80 · · Score: 1

      It's not just the US either. In most of the EU the limits are such that a single glass of wine will put you into "not sure I should drive" territory, and if you have been to dinner you definitely want to drive home on the back roads.

      As for smoking, in theory you should not smoke anywhere but in the privacy of your own home, and even that is being contested by "won't somebody please think of the CHILDREN!" types. In fact a man was fined in the UK just recently for smoking in his own van, the justification being that it was a workplace.

      The problem is that there is a genuine drink-drive problem as well, so I do see the point behind the campaign. My solution? Drink in town, so I can walk to the bar and take the beer scooter home! Also I am now a summer smoker, as then I can sit at the outside tables and smoke away.

      --
      " There is a rational explanation for everything. There is also an irrational one. "
    14. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      It's an addictive, dirty, poisonous drug that has no redeeming purpose whatsoever, and I have nothing but contempt for anyone who tries to trivialize or justify its use, let alone its being inflicted on everybody else.

      Really? You've tried it? You can honestly compare your experiences with, say, 40 years of satisfaction and relaxation provided by a pack a day, and state unequivocally that it has no purpose whatsoever?

      --
      ResidntGeek
    15. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by rugatero · · Score: 1

      2. There is no way to enforce age limits for WiiWare downloads.

      Actually there is. Of course, it relies on the parents using the console's parental controls - and you can't expect the authorities to let parents make their own minds up, can you?

      --
      This comment is for entertainment purposes only. Any similarity to real insight or information is purely coincidental.
    16. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Here's news for you: practically everybody dies whether they're a smoker or not, and whether they are exposed to tobacco smoke or not.

      The top 3 likely ways to go (in no particular order): heart problem, stroke, cancer.

      You cut your odds of getting heart disease and stroke, you increase your odds of getting cancer.

      Doc sees you have bad lipid levels, so you go on those statin thingies and whoopee you don't die of a heart attack.

      So guess what is likely to kill you eventually?

      Either way, given modern medical tech, the odds of you getting something expensive to treat and very unpleasant are pretty high whether or not you get smoke in your lungs. They can often keep you alive till it becomes too expensive or too unpleasant to bear (and sometimes beyond that unfortunately).

      I'm a nonsmoker myself, and don't like the smell of tobacco but I think having widespread smoking bans is going too far.

      Just tax places that allow smoking more. If a pub wants to allow smoking, let it, but tax it more.

      Then you get more "drug money" to spend on us nonsmokers (since nonsmokers tend to live longer ). And smokers grudgingly _accept_ being taxed and they put up with it - since it's considered a vice and it's addictive. Doesn't lose you huge amounts of votes.

      Look at Japan - they have smokers everywhere smoking like chimneys and the Gov is worried that people aren't dropping dead fast enough aka "aging population", but at the same time is trying to get people to stop smoking (and recently made laws to get people to be slimmer). Strange.

      --
    17. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by KevinIsOwn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The arrogance of smokers who complain of the smugness of people who want to enjoy themselves without breathing in smoke the whole night is incredible. Your disgusting habit is making the air dirty, giving me a headache, forcing me to wash my clothes, and raising my risk of cancer. If you want to do all of those things to yourself, fine. Just go do it outside where everyone else doesn't have to deal with your stupid habit.

    18. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a note: I don't understand how the state can tell businesses how to run themselves. Let places decide if they want smoking (or drinking, even), or not, and let the market decide.,

      I just see it as a health & safety at work type issue. In a general way, employers are not allowed to let empolyees work in a hazardous environment without suitable protection (and employees are not allowed to volunteer to do so).
      For example, if there were asbestos fibres in the air at a workplace, either they have to be removed or employees must wear protective suits. Since the latter is impractical in a bar/smoking situation, the only option is to remove the hazard.
      I don't understand why cigarette smoke should be treated differently from other air-bourne toxins. It's completely inconsistent.

    19. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by matria · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like I said before, don't bother with the crap about something else killing me. So I should go walk on the highway because I'm just as likely to die falling in my bathtub as I am by getting hit by a car? Give me a break. Anything that is clearly proven to unnecessarily and not accidentally kill tens of thousands of people, without even considering how many are sick for years before dying, is totally indefensible. Tobacco kills, it kills people around those who use it, and it's an ugly death no matter how it strikes. Do you think people should be allowed to drive drunk? Speed to their heart's content? Why not? Maybe because they might injure or kill somebody else, and sometimes do?

      Spend some time with a relative who is dying of emphysema or cancer. Volunteer at a hospice. Maybe it will give you something to think about.

    20. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the problem is with the tone. Maybe the part about it being too late someday...

      About half the population clearly wants to pass laws based on the "If I was your mom, I would prohibit that. Therefore, we'll just have the cops arrest you". They know how you should live your life and want to relieve you of the burden of making any choices yourself -- you might choose wrong if you do.

      It needs to stop because it's wrong to force people to do (or not do) things against their will. MADD and the stop-smoking people and all the rest of these groups need to be opposed.

      Don't forget what this topic is about -- they're censoring a beer pong video game.

    21. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Kevin72594 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's just the point, noone HAS to deal with it. Stop going to bars that allow smoking and the market will force certain bars to ban it.

    22. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      And you are so extremely afraid of the news media that you'll allow them to censor other media preemptively. I'm not willing to give them that power over my life or our society. Why are you?

    23. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Why do you go outside and not breathe smoke?

    24. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      I've got to say I have some sympathy for the smoking ban in businesses. There is, in my opinion, a genuine worker safety issue that the government has the authority (if not the duty) to regulate. If OSHA can set PELs (permissible exposure limits) for silica, they should be able to set them for cigarette smoke.

      On everything else I agree with you.

    25. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Yes, coal mining should be 100% unregulated. The coal miners chose their carrier, if they felt like the risk of cave-ins or respiratory disease was too great, they should have chosen another profession.

    26. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      That's why they formed a union. They got their work conditions improved without the heavy hand of government getting involved.

      You're basically saying it's bad for accidents to happen so we're going to send guys with guns (police) to force people to do things a certain way. And if they don't comply and are too effective in maintaining their freedom, shoot them. To avoid accidents.

    27. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      I don't see how this is a troll

    28. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      mod this up!!!

      This is how things should work.

    29. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Well, on the smoking ban, I actually don't entirely agree. Whether or not second hand smoke causes problems (which really hasn't been determined either way), I don't want to come home smelling like smoke, etc just because I decide to go bowling with friends.

      But, I do agree with your overall point as a whole. People should only be concerned about themselves...quite worrying what other people do so freaken much.

    30. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Lord_Fail666 · · Score: 1

      Dude your so right what right does the government have to say what i can and can not do.

      --
      "people should not be afraid of their governments, their governments should be afraid of the people." - V
    31. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      "So I should go walk on the highway because I'm just as likely to die falling in my bathtub as I am by getting hit by a car? Give me a break"

      Give me a break. Who's forcing you to walk on the highway? The smokers? I don't think so. Without widespread bans, I've still been able to avoid smoke when I want to.

      Here's a car analogy for you:

      It's more like the right to drive a car, in places where driving is not necessary - in many countries this is true (in some countries most people are too poor to have cars).

      Driving cars can be dangerous for people around them - kills thousands of people a year, it's bad for the environment.

      If you ban cars, there would be fewer car accidents and fewer people killed. In fact many people might actually live a lot longer since they would be getting a lot more exercise every day.

      Many people enjoy driving cars, and consider the risks and costs worth it.

      Should we ban cars in countries where there's good public transport? Just because pedestrians who don't drive might get killed/maimed by cars?

      To me it's all about actual risks.

      The increased risk to a smoker is significant, but hey if they are an adult it's their choice and their life[1].

      The increased risk to a nonsmoker is not very significant- given the fact that in most cases they can choose to go elsewhere. In places where it's not possible e.g. emergency room in hospital, sure ban smoking.

      Tax places that allow smoking, let there be a choice for both smokers and nonsmokers. Nonsmokers can go elsewhere. And nonsmokers can benefit from the extra $$$.

      Widespread smoking bans are just silly. They don't ban guns everywhere. Ban smoking at fuel pumps, and other places like that.

      Now the other issue is when parents smoke and their children have to breathe in their smoke - their children don't have as much choice - they can't walk away. BUT it's their children, their responsibility. If you really want a super nanny state, you might as well have the state bring children up if their parents don't pass the requirements (e.g. smoke in the house, didn't pass Parenting 101, get drunk "too often", brainwash their kids in State disapproved ways, or to think the "wrong ways").

      [1] Except if you're married. In my opinion if you marry, your spouse has say too (well I guess your spouse is going to "have say" whether you like it or not ;) ).

      --
    32. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Knara · · Score: 1

      What's a "beer scooter"?

    33. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Kohath · · Score: 1

      Moderators don't like the line about 20 or 30 cats. I got modded down using it before. It fits these people perfectly though. They're a bunch of crazy old schoolmarms who really, really know how everyone needs to live their lives. It keeps them up at night that someone is making choices differently than they would.

    34. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by armareum · · Score: 1

      Scientific evidence shows that exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke causes disease, disability, and death

      I'll point you here. The sources for the evidence are at the bottom of the page.

      --
      Is this a rhetorical question?
    35. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by wiz_80 · · Score: 1

      It's the magical vehicle which wafts you home from the pub. You know you have been travelling on the beer scooter if you have memories of your trip home for, say, five minutes, but you were at a pub three quarters of an hour's walk from home.

      --
      " There is a rational explanation for everything. There is also an irrational one. "
    36. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You aren't restricted from doing those things that could kill you though. Rise above your own ass when viewing the world.

    37. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I was going to include the workplace thing in there, but decided the post was long and ranty enough.

      I used to live in a smallish town, where they banned smoking mainly because waitresses and bartenders got together. Them, like stewardesses, I have some sympathy for. But a case can be made that no one forces them to work there, but that argument isn't as strong as it used to be with today's economy. Also it can also be applied broadly, which starts leading to some contradictions.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    38. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by ksd1337 · · Score: 1

      A lot of people want the government to be your mom and make your choices for you.

      That's the main problem. Parents have to learn that they have to actually parent their kids, instead of telling the government to be their babysitter. I'm not saying that all parents are bad, there are many good parents that raise their kids well, but there are also those who "don't have enough time for their kids" or something like that. When you spend time being with your kids and teaching them life's lessons, that is thinking of the children.

    39. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think socialism and voting against the vice laws can be consistent. We create the vice laws only because it costs the state money (as in deaths or illnesses caused by people smoking and drinking) - if the state was not burdened by those costs than we would not have to create vice laws. It is liberal people making these laws, not conservatives at all. I suppose some may consider themselves conservative but on a fundamental level it is not.

      NO ONE thinks violence is healthy for youth. Except maybe advertisers and television show producers. Check out the FTC and FCC and every single psychological study out there for that one. The problem is it is extremely hard to regulate, you have to just make sure your kids don't watch it, which is nearly impossible. The same goes for sex though - maybe not boobs but the way sex is glamorized to people at a very young age is very damaging. People are really getting tired of it, and its not really conservatives either, its both groups and I'd say moreso liberals.

    40. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by stainlesssteelpat · · Score: 1
      Lots of people work in Oncology my GF is an RN, has been for about 8 years. I work in the same ward doing patient transport, to put myself through uni. We both smoke and drink, we finish work we're bummed we go to a bar with everyone else from the shift. Hey guess what, almost all the RN's including the Nursing director smoke when they drink. No-one smokes before work or during, however after working ten hours doing some rather depressing work, you go for a beer to blow off steam. The RN's I work with have about as many vices as the Chef's I used to work with when I did that.

      So do you feel like taking your little rant into hospitals like GW's oncology ward and abuse the staff?

      --
      War is the statesman's game, the priest's delight, the lawyer's jest, the hired assassin's trade.- Shelley
    41. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by DiamondMX · · Score: 1

      Well if the smokers in question have children, and the privacy of their home includes in the same air as the said children - then somebody bloody well better be thinking of the children because the parents sure as hell aren't.
      I can't wait until smoking near your own child is considered child abuse - it's more likely to do serious harm than a slap on the arse. (Not that I'm condoning that)

      What people do that doesn't affect others is all well and good - so when the smokers start wearing fishbowls over their head to keep the foulness in - then I'll be all for their rights.
      Plus - it'd look hell-a silly.

    42. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Me? No. A company interested on selling products to a large number of people who get all their information from the mainstream media? Yes.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    43. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Like I said before, don't bother with the crap about something else killing me. So I should go walk on the highway because I'm just as likely to die falling in my bathtub as I am by getting hit by a car? Give me a break.

      Since you slippery sloped this into suicidal behaviour.....

      Is life so precious that it must be preserved at all costs?

      9 people were killed this past weekend while climbing K2. Should we ban mountain climbing? Certainly that is more dangerous than smoking of playing beer pong.

      I spent 8 years of time with a relative who passed away from dementia. Non smoking, non drinking. Watched her slowly become a vegetable.

      Problem is, self righteous folk as yourself, won't be content to stop at banning smoking or drinking. You'll find another cause to rally around to force others to submit to you.

      What's next?

      --
      Why is this even on SlashDot?... Why is this even on Slashdot?...Why is this even on Slashdot?
    44. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      This is the battle of private vs public.
      You can get as drunk as you want in private. You can get very drunk in public as long as you don't drive.
      You can smoke as much as you want in private.
      I really don't like smoke and a lot of other people agree. You can smoke all you want in private.
      That isn't a vice law. It is public health.
      You lost all creatablity with one statment.
      "I can drink all night, have a high blood alcohol percentage, and not be affected, while others can be well under the legal limit and be severely impaired. Biological differences FTW."
      No you can not. There is no way that you can drink all night, have a high blood alcohol level and not be affected. Nope not a chance can not happen. You may be affected less than other people but it will have an affect on you. Unless you are a robot.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    45. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by ElleyKitten · · Score: 1

      Don't worry kid, by the time you're 25 you'll be partied out and vote for higher cigarette taxes and tougher drunk driving laws, too.

      I know, it's terrible. I'm 27, and yesterday I was listening to two younger girls from church talking about all their drinking exploits, and I wanted to yell at them for being stupid and being too young to drink, and all that. Then I remembered when I was 16 I got kicked out of Girl Scout camp for drinking as a counselor-in-training. I just kinda slunked away in a cloud of hipocrasy.

      --
      "What is Internet Explorer 7? Are you saying we can't access the normal internet?" - I love tech support. Really.
    46. Re:So does this mean bars don't exist in games? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      You lost all creatablity with one statment

      Yes, it can be seen as a public health law, but as you said; "I really don't like smoke and a lot of other people agree," this is not the reasoning behind public health laws, this is the reasoning behind vice laws. Prohibition, I'm sure, was also billed as a public health law (amendment), but in hindsight we can all see it was nothing but another silly vice law. If the reasoning behind the law is mere distaste, it can't be seen as a public health issue.

      If it was, I could have a case for banning perfume and cologne, because they make me gag. Or spandex, for the same reason.

      Yes, the second hand foil can be brought up, but it isn't as conclusive as people would have you think. It also doesn't work for some of the more extreme laws, like banning smoking in cars, or rental properties. The latter is just moronic, the former falls squarely into the taste issue, and thus is nothing but a vice law (unless someone can state a study claiming that second hand smoke has a long radioactive-like half-life.

      Also them, we run into the "tax it to hell" class of laws. The tax laws are specifically made to "make people quit", invalidating your "public vs. private" distinction. Yes, an argument could be made, IF, the money from them were going to tobacco related problems, and not everything else in the books.

      "I can drink all night, have a high blood alcohol percentage, and not be affected, while others can be well under the legal limit and be severely impaired. Biological differences FTW."

      Biology is a wonderful thing... You .08 and my .08 are not the same. I have a couple alcoholics in my family who can drink a fifth of bourbon at a sitting, and hold a normal conversation, their blood alcohol must be off the charts though... If i drink a fraction of that, I'd probably pass out, vomit, etc... If I drink a six pack of PBR, though, I'm generally unaffected. Sure, I wouldn't trust myself to drive, but I'm definitely not drunk, and pretty much nobody I know can tell I even drank. Things affect people differently.

      Looking at the classical alcohol consumption of historical Europe, we'd consider every singe one of them a drunk these days. Hell, us Americans would probably still consider much of modern Europe to be a bunch of lushes.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  3. Drunken Aim by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lesson: Don't play games that simulate drinking before you play games that simulate driving, or larceny.

    ... or shooting at politicians. After all, you might miss.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:Drunken Aim by Kattspya · · Score: 1

      Be wary of strong drink. It can make you shoot at tax collectors - and miss.
      -Robert A Heinlein

      I also suck dick for karma but not very enthusiastically.

    2. Re:Drunken Aim by D+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a funny song quote I recently heard...
      "I miss him, but my aim is getting better."

  4. Why? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Really, this isn't such a big deal. Now if it was, say GTA or another game, but not this shovelware that has cropped up on Wii Ware. (Review here: http://www.wiiware-world.com/reviews/2008/07/frat_party_games_pong_toss). Seriously, it is a really crappy overpriced ($8) game.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Why? by xyphor · · Score: 1

      Yes, this is a big deal. TFA says local governments are banning beer pong:

      Quoting TFA:

      Since 2005, other Jersey shore towns, such as Manasquan and Sea Girt, along with municipalities in other states, followed suit; some have even prohibited drinking games indoors.

      Besides, even if it was only about some crappy game, why is that not a big deal? How much government imposed censorship are you willing to put up with?

    2. Re:Why? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      For God's sake this is NOT government censorship!!! No laws were passed, no black helicopters showed up. People sent letters to the company until it backed off. For it to be government censorship, there has to be... well... government involved.

    3. Re:Why? by xyphor · · Score: 1

      Please read my quote from TFA again. Local municipalities (i.e. local government) have "prohibited drinking games". A law or resolution would need to be passed, right? Does local government not qualify as "government"?

    4. Re:Why? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      This is going to be hilarious in about ten years time: "What the fuck? We have a law against hitting ping pong balls into cups of beer! When did we make that?!??!!"

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:Why? by Sloppy · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The government didn't censor or ban the video game. The publisher wussed out because some idiots complained. They didn't value their own speech enough to even maintain it in the face of .. other speech. Why should I care what happens to them, when they don't?

      As for banning the actual drinking game, I do think that's a bad idea, and I oppose it. But there are other things going on there, too:

      1. It really is a dumb game. Anyone who chugs beer is someone I can't help but think of as lame. Beer is the tastiest alcoholic beverage there is, and should be savored. If you're just drinking beer to get fucked up, then you need to get a clue: that's what distilled spirits are for. This is especially true in America; we might not make the best beers in the world, but it's a lot closer than it used to be and we do have the very best hops in the world bar none. If you're not sniffing your APA between every sip, then you're a sick motherfucker.
      2. The game ban is consistent with America's totally fucked up outlook about alcohol. Opposing this ban is putting the cart before the horse. We need to address the fundamentals here, instead of sweating the details. Get rid of the other entries on the enormous list of laws to protect people from themselves, and then this one can go too.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    6. Re:Why? by Sloppy · · Score: 4, Funny

      "What the fuck? We have a law against hitting ping pong balls into cups of beer! When did we make that?!??!!"

      I think we were drunk at the time.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    7. Re:Why? by murdocj · · Score: 1

      You might want to actually RTFA. The government regulated alcohol consumption, something it's been doing pretty much forever. Regulating alcohol consumption != censorship.

  5. Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by wild_quinine · · Score: 4, Funny

    concerned parents began sending angry letters to JV Games and Nintendo... until JV Games agreed to change the title of the game to Pong Toss and fill its pixelated cups with water.

    Well then let's just hope that nobody finds excessive urination offensive.

    Or stimulating for that matter.

    Honestly, when water isn't safe, where do you turn?

    1. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by multisync · · Score: 5, Informative

      Honestly, when water isn't safe, where do you turn?

      Actually, drinking too much water can be just as dangerous as drinking too much beer. People have died from drinking too much water.

      I think it's extremely irresponsible of the "parents and lawmakers" to encourage behavior that may lead to water intoxication

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    2. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Some people like to be peed on. Nintendo must be playing to that niche.

    3. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 0

      I hope you're joking...

      Neither of these articles say how much is "too much". Anything to excess can kill you -- the important point is knowing how much excess.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    4. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by multisync · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From here

      Normal, healthy (both physically and nutritionally) individuals have little to worry about accidentally consuming too much water. Nearly all deaths related to water intoxication in normal individuals have resulted either from water drinking contests, in which individuals attempt to consume more than 3 gallons (10 litres) of water over the course of just a few minutes, or long bouts of intensive exercise during which electrolytes are not properly replenished, yet massive amounts of fluid are still consumed.

      That was the case in the first article - the woman had taken part in a "water drinking contest." The second article describes soldiers who died when they drank large amounts of water after long periods of exercise. The key thing is to remember to replace those electrolytes.

      I hope you're joking...

      Yeah, a little I guess. I have no idea what a beer bong game would involve, other than drinking excessive amounts of beer. My point was that replacing beer with something that can also kill you if you drink it to excess shows someone didn't think this through very thoroughly.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    5. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by Missing_dc · · Score: 2, Interesting

      New Years Eve, 2006, on my wedding night, my guests to the reception after-party played Champagne Pong- 4 bottles, then switched to (homemade ~ 40 Proof) Meade Pong - 5 bottles! It was an awesome night, but a rough New Years Day.

      --
      How amazed would you be to suddenly find that you just forgot what I wrote and you needed to reread my post.... again.
    6. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by rascher · · Score: 1

      If the beer in the video game was Budweiser, why wouldn't it be a water sport?

    7. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by Triv · · Score: 1

      I have no idea what a beer bong game would involve, other than drinking excessive amounts of beer.

      That's a helluva typo. Allow me to elucidate with the help of hot chicks:

      This is a beer bong.
      This is beer pong.

      There really are blogs for everything.

    8. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      Full loop. Beer and coffee.

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    9. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aha.

      Well thanks for setting me straight.

      Excellent visual aids.

    10. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's regional but I've never heard of the term "beer bong" to describe that device. I've always heard it referred to simply as a funnel. The context gives away it being a beer-specific funnel. I do like the ultra-classy funnel made from a 2-liter bottle in the last pic. Too cheap to go to the auto parts store?

    11. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by sootman · · Score: 1

      But the important thing to know is, EVERYONE knows that drinking too much alcohol is bad, but most people would be VERY surprised to learn that too much water can be lethal. From the Wikipedia page:

      On January 12, 2007, Jennifer Strange, a 28-year-old woman and a mother of 3, from Rancho Cordova, California, was found dead in her home by her mother hours after trying to win one of Nintendo's Wii game consoles in KDND 107.9 "The End" radio station's "Hold Your Wee for a Wii" contest, which involved drinking large quantities of water without urinating.
       
      On October 12, 2002, 3-year-old Rosita Gonzalez died of water intoxication when her babysitter Nancy Gayoso punished her by forcing her to drink three quarts (2.8 liters) of water in a four-hour period.
       
      In a much-publicized case of fraternity hazing, four members of the Chi Tau (formerly Delta Sigma Phi) House at California State University, Chico pleaded guilty to forcing 21-year-old student Matthew Carrington to drink excessive amounts of water while performing calisthenics in a frigid basement as part of initiation rites on February 2, 2005. He collapsed and died of heart failure due to water intoxication.

      The first one was also covered on Slashdot. In one of the cases (I forget which; I think the first but can't search right now) someone called the contest organizers and/or the police to warn them but they thought the caller was joking.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    12. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      But the important thing to know is, EVERYONE knows that drinking too much alcohol is bad, but most people would be VERY surprised to learn that too much water can be lethal.

      What are the relative dosages, though?

      First case, they weren't urinating. That can't be good.

      Second case was quite a lot of water for a three-year-old. In fact, when was the last time you drank most of a gallon in four hours?

      Third case, no amount of water is actually mentioned, just that it was "excessive".

      Again: Too much of anything can kill you. It's the relative dosages that are interesting here.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    13. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      replacing beer with something that can also kill you if you drink it to excess

      Um.. anything?

    14. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      All true. At least one college has outlawed water pong (but not beer pong) because it is too dangerous. They are more worried about "water poisoning" than "alcohol poisoning". Shame on the Wii for endangering our childern!

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    15. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by multisync · · Score: 1

      Um.. anything?

      Well, yeah, I suppose. But drinking excessive amounts of water specifically can be fatal, due to the imbalance of electrolytes it creates. So a game that promotes drinking water to excess is no better than a game that promotes drinking beer to excess. Either one can kill you.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    16. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      The key thing is to remember to replace those electrolytes.

      Drink BRAWNDO: The Thirst Mutilator!

    17. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by multisync · · Score: 1

      I'd never heard o Brawndo. I use Power Bar products, and Gator Aid, when I run. I guess I'll have to give Brawndo a try. Do you work for them, or are you just a satisfied customer?

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    18. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by trdrstv · · Score: 1

      Actually it's a reference to the movie Idiocracy which is pretty funny for the first half then goes down hill the longer the focus on the future. Honestly I didn't realize it was a real product until today, but if they support movies like that I'll have to try one.

    19. Re:Nothing wrong with water sports, after all... by multisync · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'll check that out :)

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
  6. Hypocricy by Aardpig · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The US has some of the most stringent laws amongst western nations for limiting alcohol access to young adults. You can be taxed, vote, fuck and die for your country, but you can't drink beer until you're 21. Yet, amongst its peers, it ranks close to the top in terms of alcohol abuse and related activities like drink driving.

    Similar hypocricy abounds in other spheres of life. The 'most free' nation in the developed world, yet a higher fraction of its population imprisoned than anywhere else. Abstinence only, but the highest rates of teenage pregnancy.

    All of these are symptomatic of the US's prohibitionist approach to life -- a trait that can be traced all the way back to the pilgrims, who fled England not to be free from religious persecution, but so that they could themselves persecute without interference.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    1. Re:Hypocricy by nawcom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In God We Trust

    2. Re:Hypocricy by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      Who's god?

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Hypocricy by timmarhy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      it's definately a crime to think some kid could die in iraq without ever having had a beer.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    4. Re:Hypocricy by Jimmy+King · · Score: 2, Funny

      Your post reminds me of an experience at work some time back. I work with content for mobile phones. As part of my job at one point I would provide ringtones to AT&T that our company had licensed. These had to go through a somewhat stringent approval process. There was one batch I was submitting which contained the song "Drink in my cup". That song was denied due to references to alcohol. In the same batch was "Gat in my lap". That song was passed. Ridiculous.

    5. Re:Hypocricy by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Funny
      I get your point, and it's a good one (though it's been said a million times before, and you're preaching to the choir). What I want to know is:

      You can be taxed, vote, fuck and die for your country, but you can't drink beer until you're 21

      I can fuck for my country?! Sign me up for three tours!

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Hypocricy by fifirebel · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who's god?

      The almighty dollar!

    7. Re:Hypocricy by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      it's definately a crime to think some kid could die in iraq without ever having had a beer.

      It is? Then, I suggest you practice civil disobedience and think about it, think about it a lot.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank the Christian fundamentalists for involving their religion in a political system that should otherwise be governed by logic and reason. They're responsible for this mess. They're the ones who sent the Republican party spiraling in the "Big Government Is The Only Government" direction of the Democrats.

    9. Re:Hypocricy by xanadu-xtroot.com · · Score: 1

      I suggest you practice civil disobedience and think about it, think about it a lot.

      Aren't you supposed to add a

      ...and get off my lawn!

      after saying something that?

      --
      I'm not a prophet or a stone-age man,
      I'm just a mortal with potential of a super man.
    10. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly do you fuck for your country???

    11. Re:Hypocricy by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 1

      What does trust in God have to do with the United States?

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
    12. Re:Hypocricy by philspear · · Score: 1

      You can be taxed, vote, fuck and die for your country, but you can't drink beer until you're 21.

      I usually fuck for myself, not my country. Just ask my girlfriend.

    13. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no god, a man who was later killed in a zebra crossing proved his existence, and then killed him with simple logic.

    14. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grammar 1. Hypocrisy 2. "You can be taxed, vote, fuck and die for your country," without extra comma I guess one can "fuck for your country" and also "die for your country" I suck.

    15. Re:Hypocricy by Daimanta · · Score: 1

      Well, the Bush administration is fucking you right now, so it is only an upper class privilege.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    16. Re:Hypocricy by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 1

      In God We Trust

      All Others Pay Cash

    17. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its my understanding that the pilgrims were pretty big fans of beer and probably gave it to their children and at bare minimum their teens.

    18. Re:Hypocricy by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, you can get fucked for your country. I'm sure there are recruiters somewhere near you, so you should have no problem signing up for a tour...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    19. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      IAASMUT - I Am A Service Member Under Twenty-one - and I'm tired of hearing this argument. You can, in fact, drink if you're risking your life for your country. When in non-forward-deployed, non-CONUS locations, the legal drinking age is 18. Yes, you heard it right, when under-21 service members are deployed, risking their lives for their country, they are allowed to drink in their downtime.

      There ARE restrictions - usually a ration card that allows you three alcoholic beverages a day, and obviously no drinking when you're forward deployed (read: taking fire!)

      So all of you 18 year old pricks who whine about not being able to drink but being able to die for your country, well, join up and drink up.

    20. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a big fan of fucking for my country.

    21. Re:Hypocricy by Kopiok · · Score: 1

      Not if it's Natty Ice.

    22. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I first read your response, I saw "three hours" and was going to ask if you wanted them in 2 or 5 minute increments?

    23. Re:Hypocricy by Collective+0-0009 · · Score: 1

      EPIC FAIL.
      You did get the last two words right.

      --
      I finally updated my sig, but now it's lame.
    24. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Man that's deep.

    25. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a crime. (in a sense)

      The sad reality is today's teenagers are not responsible enough to drink in the US.
      We let then do it in other countries instead. But isn't it interesting you don't hear about some drunk E-3 killing someone on deployment?

      that's because they got caught dunk driving over here for the third time and got a BCD.

    26. Re:Hypocricy by leereyno · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is precisely why I've never had any respect whatsoever for the law. Now I'm no criminal, I try harder than many to avoid doing things that are wrong. However, if the only argument against something is that it is illegal then I don't consider that to be an argument at all. The tyranny of the majority not a moral principle. It is simply one of the inherent flaws of democratic rule.

      What gets me the most is how people my age (35) and a little older will almost have a conniption about their kids doing the very same things that they (and I) did when we were that age. I drank, sometimes to excess but not often. I had sex, as did most of my peers. I didn't mess with drugs but I knew many who did. This is what is known as High School.

      Very few of the things I did at that age were wrong, though many were forbidden because of my age. But I'll be damned if I'm going to apologize for any of it. I responded with puzzlement to the bizarre histrionics that older people would emote over the things I and others my age did. If it was ok for them to do it, then as far as I was concerned it was ok for me too. I stand by that to this very day. For the longest time I believed that the antics of the older generations were a put on, an act, a contrivance of melodrama and theatrics intended to fool me and others of that age into believing absurdities through which we could be controlled. In other words, a scam, a con. I didn't believe that the adults in my life actually believed the things they were saying, because grown people couldn't possibly be that stupid...or so I though. As I've grown older I've come to realize that yes, people can be that stupid, a life-long ailment for which there is no cure.

      I honestly think that most people simply don't remember their teenage years in sufficient detail to understand what it means to be a teenager. They claim to understand, but their actions and attitudes speak otherwise.

      Today the things I endured in high school are now being perpetrated upon college students, who by any sane definition are supposed to be adults. Colleges and Universities are there to provide an education to their students, not to act in loco parentis. If someone isn't grown by the time they reach college, then it means their parents didn't do their job. It doesn't mean that the university should be stuck picking up the slack.

      It is sad and sick that grown men and women would be so fearful that their adult (or nearly adult) children might drink beer that they would launch a grass-roots movement against a video game for merely featuring the beverage.

      These people have too much time on their hands if this is what they consider to be a pressing concern.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    27. Re:Hypocricy by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's accurate to call it hypocrisy to have a 21 year drinking age, though hypocrisy certainly exists around the subject. We have high rates of alcoholism, so it's not apriori stupid for us to try to address the problem with laws. After the fact, however, it's apparent that the laws don't work, and that maybe we should be looking at other causes. One of those causes is that young people don't get taught good, safe drinking habits, and I would have to say that beer pong and other drinking games are certainly not emblematic of good habits.

      I don't disagree with you as to the ailments you bemoan, but hypocrisy is not an accurate description. Hypocrisy is condemning someone else for behavior that you yourself exhibit. What we have going on in the US is a willful resistance to acknowledging that our tactics do not move us towards our goals. We refuse to admit that prohibition doesn't keep kids from doing drugs, that mandating abstinence doesn't inhibit teen pregnancy, and that invading foreign countries makes their people hate us.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    28. Re:Hypocricy by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Whose god?"

      There, fixed that for you.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    29. Re:Hypocricy by geoffaus · · Score: 1

      I earnt a purple heart fucking for my country :-)

      --
      As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
    30. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it said "fuck and die" for your country. I'm sure the politicians don't mind in which order you do it either!

    31. Re:Hypocricy by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a great deal! Perhaps ill wait till I'm 21.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    32. Re:Hypocricy by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      You'll find that not everyone had that kind of teenage childhood - and those that didn't push for these sorts of things sometimes if only to justify to themselves that their life was the correct way to live, and why they didn't have fun when they could have.

      After all the most vocal supporters of female circumcision are older women whom themselves have been circumscribed - and I will never forget seeing that anti women's rights rally in the middle east which was led by women.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    33. Re:Hypocricy by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, although you are legally considered an adult upon turning 18, you cannot drink unless you sign up with the military and go off shooting people. I don't see how that's a healthy societal attitude.

      Oh, and I'm too old to join up. Not that it matters, since I'm old enough to drink. Also, I'm more use to my country in a lab than elsewhere.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    34. Re:Hypocricy by deraj123 · · Score: 1

      Mine.

    35. Re:Hypocricy by operagost · · Score: 1

      It's not persecution if you willingly submit yourself to stringent rules. The Pilgrims did not seek to oppress anyone; in fact, they even wrote up a bare-bones "constitution" (the Mayflower Compact) before landing. No one was forced to join their colony, and they did not conquer other colonies. Complaining about the Pilgrims is like complaining how the nutjobs who cut off their testicles and killed themselves waiting for the mothership infringed on your rights. It also wasn't the first colony in North America; you could just as well use the Jamestown settlement as the basis for your prejudiced view of American history.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    36. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can be taxed, vote, fuck and die for your country, ....
      I can fuck for my country? Damn, I feel so selfish, just doing it for myself all these years.

    37. Re:Hypocricy by glitch23 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The US has some of the most stringent laws amongst western nations for limiting alcohol access to young adults. You can be taxed, vote, fuck and die for your country, but you can't drink beer until you're 21. Yet, amongst its peers, it ranks close to the top in terms of alcohol abuse and related activities like drink driving.

      That may be because American teenagers are irresponsible asswipes and trying to minimize alcohol use helps us protect society as a whole from said teenagers. Being taxed, voting, f*cking, and dying only affects the individual taking part in those activities. Drinking and driving on the other hand can cause more people to die than just the person who was drinking.

      Similar hypocricy abounds in other spheres of life. The 'most free' nation in the developed world, yet a higher fraction of its population imprisoned than anywhere else. Abstinence only, but the highest rates of teenage pregnancy.

      Without laws there is chaos. You don't say where you are from so you obviously must live in a country with no freedom at all and feel you must complain about us to make your own country look at least a little better in some small way. I'm sure your country has laws that someone else may find equally idiotic but we conveniently can't comment on that since you didn't mention your nationality.

      All of these are symptomatic of the US's prohibitionist approach to life -- a trait that can be traced all the way back to the pilgrims, who fled England not to be free from religious persecution, but so that they could themselves persecute without interference.

      Orrrr.......they are symptomatic of a country whose religious foundation has eroded away over the decades such that it is more desired by society as a whole to teach kids how to have sex, to advertise sex in every imaginable way using teenagers, and teach them about Islam in schools than it is to teach them about Christianity, how to respect others instead of killing them, and to not act like a slut by age 15.

      Seems you either have issues with the United States providing more freedom than your own country (which you neglected to mention in your rant about us) or you just have issues with Christians and feel that the U.S. is failing because of their sheer existence rather than their decreasing visibility and influence in American society. You failed to mention the correlation between the latter and the U.S's current situation.

      Considering fewer Americans every year believe that homosexuality is sin, that abortion is wrong, that religion is important, and that proper parenting (setting rules for children to follow, keeping a watchful eye on them, caring for them, and an even distribution of male/female organs) is important, it is hard to imagine there are people like you who think that the laws of this nation are actually causing our downfall. You obviously haven't looked at the situation entirely. Maybe you have biases that prevent you from doing so?

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
    38. Re:Hypocricy by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Now which God is this again?

    39. Re:Hypocricy by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      So buy the damn kids some beer.

    40. Re:Hypocricy by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Decreasing influence of Christians in the US? A country where it has 'God' on its money? Where students have to pledge alliegance to 'One nation under God'? Where trying to run for any public office as an atheist is futile?

      Grow up and stop whining, you pathetic little shit. Christians in the US have it far easier than any other religious group, who in turn have it far easier than the non-religious.

      For the record: I've lived in the US for 5 years now. There are many things I love about it, but one thing I detest is pathetic little God-squadders like yourself bitching about how put-upon you are -- all while you stack the government and the legal system with religious nutjobs who want to force Christ down my throat and my family's throat at every possible moment.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    41. Re:Hypocricy by Jumperalex · · Score: 1

      Hmmm and yet at Al Udeid, a decidedly non-forward deployed location, you must be 21 to drink. Of course as someone else said, In the AF and you're out of luck.

      --
      If you can't be good, be good at it!
    42. Re:Hypocricy by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      Wow, a whole 3 drinks a day. Yipee. Genetically I have a high tolerance. That wouldn't even qualify me as drunk. Unless you can save up a week and go out on the weekend.

    43. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know there is only one God
      ehh, maybe that joke would have been funnier in the 80's

    44. Re:Hypocricy by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      That may be because American teenagers are irresponsible asswipes and trying to minimize alcohol use helps us protect society as a whole from said teenagers. Being taxed, voting, f*cking, and dying only affects the individual taking part in those activities. Drinking and driving on the other hand can cause more people to die than just the person who was drinking.

      Wow, generalizing much? Not everyone who drinks drives. In fact, 90% of the people I've seen drink underage don't drive afterwards.

      Orrrr.......they are symptomatic of a country whose religious foundation has eroded away over the decades such that it is more desired by society as a whole to teach kids how to have sex, to advertise sex in every imaginable way using teenagers, and teach them about Islam in schools than it is to teach them about Christianity, how to respect others instead of killing them, and to not act like a slut by age 15.

      Religious foundation... truly a funny proposition. If the United States is such a Christian country, why did it let my ancestors in? We're Jews, the lot of us. Or do I not belong here? Should I move to Israel?

      After hearing so many like you, that's the conclusion I've come to.

      Seems you either have issues with the United States providing more freedom than your own country (which you neglected to mention in your rant about us) or you just have issues with Christians and feel that the U.S. is failing because of their sheer existence rather than their decreasing visibility and influence in American society. You failed to mention the correlation between the latter and the U.S's current situation.

      Considering fewer Americans every year believe that homosexuality is sin, that abortion is wrong, that religion is important, and that proper parenting (setting rules for children to follow, keeping a watchful eye on them, caring for them, and an even distribution of male/female organs) is important, it is hard to imagine there are people like you who think that the laws of this nation are actually causing our downfall. You obviously haven't looked at the situation entirely. Maybe you have biases that prevent you from doing so?

      And you think that the United States should subjugate the other religions to a Christian government. Maybe you have biases that prevent you from looking at the situation entirely?

    45. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      i dont think it's stilly to think that taking a young person, putting them through fairly stringent training, instilling a strong sense of duty and morals, and surrounding them with a fairly rigid social structure will make them mature a bit faster than the usual suburbanite kids.

    46. Re:Hypocricy by servognome · · Score: 1

      I can fuck for my country?! Sign me up for three tours!

      Welcome to the Gitmo interrogation team... you're a braver man than I.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    47. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sex with old people at age 16. Join the military, vote, and own a rifle at 18. Own a handgun and drink beer at 21.

      Sure shows what this country's priorities are?

    48. Re:Hypocricy by jaimev · · Score: 1

      Its not a matter of them having too much time on their hands I think. They're just using the old "think of the children!" trick.

    49. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and when I point out that the Pilgrims fled England to Holland to escape religious persecution, and fled Holland to America escape religious *acceptance* I get the dead fish look.

      Bradford feared the young were being "drawn away by evil examples into extravagance and dangerous courses" It was those naughty Dutch girls! His biggest fear was their assimilation into Dutch culture.

      Assimilation is the opposite of persecution.
      but persecution makes a better myth.
      http://goeurope.about.com/od/rotterdam/ig/delfshaven-pictures/delfshaven-plaque-6.htm
       

    50. Re:Hypocricy by Knara · · Score: 1

      We have high alcoholism rates compared to... what, exactly?

    51. Re:Hypocricy by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if that was a typo or a reasonably good pun. Either way you asked two questions, neither of which has a satisfactory answer.

      --
      Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
    52. Re:Hypocricy by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      i dont think it's stilly to think that taking a young person, putting them through fairly stringent training, instilling a strong sense of duty and morals, and surrounding them with a fairly rigid social structure will make them mature a bit faster than the usual suburbanite kids.

      So laws shouldn't apply to them? I my parents were killed while I was in HS, and I raised my kid sister myself. That would give me fast-tracked maturity too. But you don't get a maturity license in this country.

      If laws are not applied equally, then whats the fucking point?

    53. Re:Hypocricy by houghi · · Score: 1

      I can fuck for my country?! Sign me up for three tours!

      Don't think what you can do for your country, think what your country does to you.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    54. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize some people have a problem with drinking here in America as they do with everything.. work, food, sex, drugs, speeding, you name it, someone can't handle it. BUT the majority of people who do drink or smoke or whatever tend to be more moderate once its no longer taboo. I drank waaaaay to much before 21, now at 23 I'll have a beer now and then when hanging with friends or having diner. Not to get drunk, but because I enjoy a nice cold beer(note: nice does not include budweiser, coors, miller, or any other big name brands or shitty brands such as Keystone, Natural Light, Ect. Nice includes beers like fat tire, shiner, samual adams has some nice ones) Had I been able to drink at 18 or even 16 like it is in some european contries and went to the pub with my dad, I can guarentee I would not have drank so much, because it would be like having a cup of coffee; just a bigger buzz. Hell Amsterdam the "Pot Capital" of the world, only 7% of its population actually uses it. While here in America where it is illegal, I'm willing to bet the number it closer to 50%, possibly more. Which, completely off topic, if the government made it legal such and followed laws simular to Amsterdam, crime rates would probably go down some what.

    55. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So interchangable, the fundamentalistic muslims and fundamentalistic christians.
      This is what you get if you let religion into politics.

    56. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's too bad you wasted your internet ration on this post -- you come across as a douchebag.

    57. Re:Hypocricy by EvolutionsPeak · · Score: 1

      While I agree with your sentiment, I hope you realize that your elders may just want you to not repeat their mistakes. It is not necessarily ALL stupidity on their part. (Just most of it)

    58. Re:Hypocricy by Omestes · · Score: 1

      You drank anyways no?

      I've been drinking since I was 6 (Wisconsin and a German/Irish family), and no one stopped me. I've been drinking with friends since I was 15, and no one gave me problems, as long as I didn't cause them.

      Yes, our vice laws are dumb. I agree. I do think we should lower the drinking age, as well. But your issue isn't valid. I can see the parents point, your actively risking your life, you've received training, therefore you ARE an adult in everyway.

      America has many standards for adulthood. Oddly, in college, you aren't one until 25 (financially independent from parents), you can't drink until you are 21, you can't vote (via constitutional amendment) until you are 18, and the various ages of marriage and sexual consent vary by what state your in (as low as 14). Age and adulthood will always be a boondoggle, since there is no objective way of making a line. You might have been "mature" at 16, but a lot of people weren't. Hell, a lot of people aren't mature at 21, go to your local uni for proof.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    59. Re:Hypocricy by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      I never got the pilgrim angle. Sure they were Puritans, but most of us aren't descended from them. So the tendency must come from somewhere else.

    60. Re:Hypocricy by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      18 year olds can drink on military bases. Not in Iraq though.

    61. Re:Hypocricy by Omestes · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't even qualify me as drunk.

      Proving your immaturity. Who said the point of drinking was to get drunk? If it is, I must fail at drinking, since I often enjoy a single glass of wine, or a nice pint of beer with dinner. Sometimes when I feel very good about myself, I splurge on nice aged bourbon (Elija Craig) or a good Irish whiskey on the rocks. I've been known to make a double bourbon last for a half hour, the same with a good martini (dry, dirty). Sometimes even, *gasp*, I have an Oz of port for desert.

      Drinking is much more than getting drunk. Yes, sometimes its fun, but it isn't the point.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    62. Re:Hypocricy by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Was added during the cold war as some way of segregating the US from the "godless" communists.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    63. Re:Hypocricy by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      I guess it would drive recruitment rates up if you could drink before joining the army...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    64. Re:Hypocricy by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      No I'm pretty sure idiots voting affects us all equally. I'm not terribly worried about the young folk though. It's the old voting that worries me.

    65. Re:Hypocricy by lxs · · Score: 1

      I think that quote is missing an "off".

    66. Re:Hypocricy by cluke · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I was 18, I used to work with a guy in his 30s, born again. With a solemn face he would tell me about his "sins" and how he had lived a live of debauchery for years but now he had seen the light and was a Christian now, and how I shouldn't make the same mistake he did and repent now. I'm thinking "Nuts to you pal, so you get your 10 years of hedonism 'til your good and done with it and then turn round and try to deny me the same?"

      Nothing like saving other people from YOUR temptations.

    67. Re:Hypocricy by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Informative
      it's definately a crime to think some kid could die in iraq without ever having had a beer.

      I think quite a lot of the kids dying in Iraq have never had a beer. They're mostly Muslims, remember?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    68. Re:Hypocricy by Karellen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "if the only argument against something is that it is illegal then I don't consider that to be an argument at all."

      You don't have to just not consider it an argument, it isn't an argument.

      You either have to base your laws off of your ethics, or your ethics off of your laws. You can't do both, as that's just circular reasoning, which is a logical fallacy, and therefore not a valid (i.e. rational, logical) argument.

      If you base your ethics off of your laws, where do these laws come from? Well, I suppose if you're particularly religious then you might think that eternal, unchangeable laws come from God and fixed morals are based off of those. But if that is the case then you ought to still be selling your daughter into slavery, killing people who insisted on working the sabbath, etc...

      No, laws are made by people, based off of their ethics.[0] We[1] decide what is legal and illegal based on what we believe is right and wrong.

      But, the law-making process is not perfect. Sometimes laws were made in an earlier time, and our definition of what is right and wrong has changed since then. Sometimes laws are made imperfectly and do not solve the problem they were trying to. Sometimes they accidentally cause a greater problem than the one they were trying to solve.

      If any of these are the case, it is up to people to write new laws, or strike existing ones from the books, in order to bring the law better in line with our ethics. It would be completely illogical to say that because a law exists, we must alter our ethics to adhere to it, and never change those ethics again. If that were the case, black people would still be giving up their seats on buses for white people.

      It is therefore completely logically invalid to decide whether something is right or wrong based on whether or not it is illegal. We need to decide whether something is right or wrong solely from other ethical arguments. Only then can we create laws (if we have determined that laws need creating) to protect or outlaw a particular behaviour.

      [0] Ignoring laws which are purchased by lobbyers for the purpose of this discussion.

      [1] "We" meaning "the people that we have freely chosen (elected) to make such decisions on our behalf."

      --
      Why doesn't the gene pool have a life guard?
    69. Re:Hypocricy by xaxa · · Score: 1

      At graduate recruitment events in the UK, it's quite common for the recruiting companies to offer beer or wine.

      At a Google recruitment event I went to there were only soft drinks. One of the Googlers asked me if I'd enjoyed the event, and I jokingly said they should have provided beer. The London-based Googler said they'd wanted to, but someone in the USA had forbidden it.

    70. Re:Hypocricy by Kaukomieli · · Score: 2, Funny

      What gets me the most is how people my age (35) and a little older will almost have a conniption about their kids doing the very same things that they (and I) did when we were that age. I drank, sometimes to excess but not often. I had sex/b>, as did most of my peers. I didn't mess with drugs but I knew many who did. This is what is known as High School.

      Up until that point I was about to believe you...

    71. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ....and die for oil.

    72. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But all our big problems are solved.
      Yea, it's a good thing we're not involved in an illegal invasion and occupation of a foreign state or anything.

    73. Re:Hypocricy by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      It's written on the currency maybe? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_God_We_Trust

    74. Re:Hypocricy by christ,+jesus+H · · Score: 1

      I have to be honest, I didnt have much problem drinking at 18 (or even younger) without risking my life. It might not have been legal, but then the consequences were NEVER my own death LOL?

      --
      Ohh spiteful one tell me who to smote and he shall be smolten!
    75. Re:Hypocricy by Sporkus · · Score: 1

      Not that most adults in Iraq will ever have a beer, either.

      Muslims generally view alcohol as haraam (forbidden by God), and despite the overturning of Saddam's outright ban on booze, there are still few who dare to sell the stuff.

      (Good comment though--sorry to sidestep your point.)

    76. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they could have used all that time they invested in the movement to do something about their children. But, of course, it's easier to buy the kid a DS and put it in the back of the car instead of talking to it.

    77. Re:Hypocricy by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      The 'most free' nation in the developed world, yet a higher fraction of its population imprisoned than anywhere else.

      The Economist says Sweeden is the most free in their Democracy Index. The USA is number 17.

      Reporters Without Borders determined that Iceland is the 'most free' as far as freedom of the press. The US came in at #48.

      The Fraser Institute marks Hong Kong as the most free economically, with the USA coming in 5th.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    78. Re:Hypocricy by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      I get your point, and it's a good one (though it's been said a million times before, and you're preaching to the choir). What I want to know is:

      You can be taxed, vote, fuck and die for your country, but you can't drink beer until you're 21

      I can fuck for my country?! Sign me up for three tours!

      Yes, but it's not one or the other, it's both. "fuck and die" for your country.

      Me, I'd rather do it on my own time and live to get some more later...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    79. Re:Hypocricy by Thiez · · Score: 1

      Actually, the laws concerning pot in the Netherlands don't make a lot of sense. It is legal for coffeeshops to sell cannabis, but they are not allowed to grow or buy it. Everyone in this country KNOWS that these shops have to break the law to resupply (it is inevitable) but the police kind of ignores it. A more sane approach would be to legalize growing cannabis.

    80. Re:Hypocricy by Twisp · · Score: 1

      Part of the "Not old enough to drink, but old enough to kill" argument is indeed invalidated by the fact that "When in non-forward-deployed, non-CONUS locations, the legal drinking age is 18."

      However, this is only part of the point. At 18, you are legally able to make the decision to put your own life in harm's way and possibly end the lives of others. However, you are not legally able to make the decision to drink alcohol, no matter how responsible you may be in your actions.

      I do feel there is a contradiction there.

      However, it is an extremely complex issue. There are many caveats - for example, I believe certain drinking, such as having a glass of wine at dinner with the family consenting and present is permitted, at least in some areas.

      To the best of my understanding, the discrepancy between the age of majority and the drinking age is due to statistics. Consider your driving insurance - rates are lower for females than males, lower after certain ages, and so on, all due to studies and the resulting statistics. To the best of my knowledge, studies show(ed) that incidents of drunk driving fell significantly after the age of twenty-one, and so that became the legal drinking age.

      As much as I hated waiting to hit twenty-one, and putting myself at risk when I drank before the age of twenty-one, I can understand the logic behind both sides of the argument.

    81. Re:Hypocricy by Twisp · · Score: 1

      As a note, I was referring to understanding both sides of the 'old enough to fight but not old enough to drink argument.'

      The 'Beer Pong' video game hoopla is just idiotic. It is counter to freedom of expression, and, as has been noted, counter-productive. Prohibition will only increase the appeal.

      Would you rather attend a Beer Pong tournament, or an illegal underground Beer Pong tournament?

    82. Re:Hypocricy by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      France, Holland, and Italy, for example.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    83. Re:Hypocricy by FictionPimp · · Score: 1

      Do you take it in the butt as well? Not the whole thing, but just the tip.

      Just kidding, I totally agree with you. I tend to drink just for the enjoyment of drinking. However my friends drink to get drunk, sometimes I find myself in a spot of binge drinking trouble.

    84. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vice is a dark and destructive balancing energy that is going to flow within human nature regardless; prohibitive law only decides whether it gets channeled into normal outlets or perversions.

    85. Re:Hypocricy by Freeside1 · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere that the reason for the age of 21 is that the average human brain isn't fully developed until 21 [citation needed]

    86. Re:Hypocricy by leereyno · · Score: 1

      This is what is known as Stockholm Syndrome.

      --
      Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
    87. Re:Hypocricy by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      As a former resident of Amsterdam, I have to disagree - legalising the growing of it would cause a lot of other problems. I'd prefer to see the GOVERNMENT grow it, then sell it to the coffeeshops. After all, Amsterdam's tourist industry (which is not small) pretty much relies on the pot and hookers, so the government should step in and get some of the profits while also cleaning up the "dodgyness" of the supply system.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    88. Re:Hypocricy by Thiez · · Score: 1

      They could make it so that one would require a license to grow cannabis, that might work. I don't really care how they solve it as long as they come up with a system that does not require people to break to law to make it work.

      Not that I expect our current government ever to make such a move... they'd probably ban all drugs the moment they they think they can get away with it.

    89. Re:Hypocricy by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      >>If it was ok for them to do it, then as far as I was concerned it was ok for me too.

      There is quite a difference between copying adult actions and copying adolescent actions. Childhood and high school are times when you are expected to make mistakes, although of course this is not encouraged. There are reasons that laws apply differently to kids under 18. It is because their worldview and ability to foresee the true consequences of their actions make them prone to mistakes that would otherwise cause major legal problems for an adult, who is supposed to act rationally. I'm sorry, I haven't had my coffee yet.

      What I mean is this: When I was very young (1), I crapped my pants. When I was a little older (5), I painted the dog. And when I was even older (14), we went around making drano bombs in the woods. Those would all be considered pretty major mistakes if I made them now at 25, barring some kind of illness. And I think that teenage sex, drinking, and drug use ranks up there with crapping one's pants or making drano bombs. At 14 I was incapable of making the right decision about mixing pressurized caustic liquids without eye protection. Would you trust me or other like me to have sex and deal with a child? To reduce my already questionable judgment with alcohol or other drugs?

      Kids are not little adults- they are entirely different creatures with different though processes, priorities, and perspectives. I mean no disrespect by saying this, but there are very real physiological and psychological reasons that adolescents are different and less fit to make life-changing decisions than adults.

      Your argument only works for you because you pick adults who are alive and well after making possibly poor decisions as teens; I'll bet you wouldn't say, "Well uncle steve got drunk when he was 17 and drove into a tree and died and killed his date as well, and dammit if he did it then so can I." You can cherry pick all the people who had sex with no consequences, smoked pot and never got caught, took lsd and somehow managed after all that to make it into respectable adulthood. Of course you are ignoring all the people who started smoking at 12 who will be dead before retirement, the people who had babies as teenagers and whose lives were basically ruined, and so on. I know many people who ruined their lives by making adult decisions as teenagers.

      "Don't be such a chicken, Kif. Teenagers smoke, and they seem pretty on-the-ball."

      -b

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
    90. Re:Hypocricy by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately that might be true. Back when I lived there, if someone said what you're saying now, I would have just laughed. But after the recent magic mushroom business, it's not looking so good.
      Oh, Nederland, where did that feeling of REAL freedom go over the last few years?

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    91. Re:Hypocricy by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      fuck and die for your country

      Where do I sign up to fuck for my country?

      --
      Fnord.
    92. Re:Hypocricy by mazarin5 · · Score: 1

      After all the most vocal supporters of female circumcision are older women whom themselves have been circumscribed

      We need to stop circumscribing men and women both.

      --
      Fnord.
    93. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3 alcoholic beverages a day?

      Does one Texas mickey count as an alcoholic beverage? If not, you're not partying right.

    94. Re:Hypocricy by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      So this is weird, normally i would agree with you but just now, reading what you said, I came to the notion that it makes SENSE to do it that way, at least from one point of view.

      If the notion is that you have to wait to drink until you are responsible enough to handle yourself, one could make a VERY good argument that someone who has made the choice to fight for their country has made possible the most responsible decision possible, to give his life for his country. To me, it in the same vein as Starship Troopers.

      Mind you, I think it should clearly be 18 for everyone, if not possibly younger,I am just saying that the notion you are demonstrating the ability to make a "more adult" choice could reasonably lead to someone gaining more access.

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
    95. Re:Hypocricy by Knara · · Score: 1

      You have references? Google only gives me extrapolations, not real numbers, in addition to some pretty annoyingly broad definitions of alcoholism.

    96. Re:Hypocricy by wiz_80 · · Score: 1

      The plural of anecdote is not data, but when Americans go for a business lunch in Italy, they are shocked that the Italians have a glass of wine. However, the Italian will be holding his American colleague's head as he heaves his guts up outside the bar later on - something the Italian (on average) hasn't done since he was sixteen.

      --
      " There is a rational explanation for everything. There is also an irrational one. "
    97. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can be taxed, vote, fuck and die for your country, but you can't drink beer until you're 21.

      If you're in the military and you're under 21, you
      are allowed to drink on-base.

    98. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We do have one of the most stringent laws but we have one of the _lowest_ rates of abuse (sad I know). European countries are actually thinking about increasing the drinking age to deal with the problem. http://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/arh283/111-120.htm
      (scroll down for comparison between countries)

      Remember that the reason why its 21 in the US is because of funding for highways. Irresponsible underage drinkers were killing too many people.

      Also remember that you can drink legally if its a parent giving you alcohol in many states. Have you ever looked up your state laws? The law is more geared towards preventing dumb college kids from killing people in car accidents. Sure it will always happen to some extent but it was happening way more in that age group. MADD has estimated about 20,000 people have not died in accidents because the age was increased. Though in principle I agree, I still don't think being able to drink is as important as fundamental rights like voting. I don't have a problem with it, the people who are upset about it are usually the ones who want to binge drink.

    99. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, um, it's not just Republicans, you know.

      Remember Obama, the church he went to, and the whole "God Damn America" thing? While the name has changed over the years, that church can trace its lines right back to the Puritans.

      In other words, the Democrats are just as much Christian fundamentalists are the Republicans. They're just dishonest about it.

    100. Re:Hypocricy by LMariachi · · Score: 1

      You don't have to be genetically descended from members of a pioneering culture for that culture to have a lasting influence on subsequent version numbers thereof. The pilgrims were among the first European cultures to take hold in North America, so they were able to provide the framework of their laws and morals that later emigrants had to accept or, if able to, modify. Look at all the books of "crazy laws that are still in effect," from the obscure and unprosecuted ("It shall be a felony to tie an alligator over six feet long to a hitching post without special dispensation from the Sheriff") to the northeastern Blue Laws that nobody can muster any political will to overturn ("No alcohol over 15 proof shall be sold on Sundays between 4AM and 10AM")

    101. Re:Hypocricy by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Orrrr.......they are symptomatic of a country whose religious foundation has eroded away over the decades such that it is more desired by society as a whole to teach kids how to have sex, to advertise sex in every imaginable way using teenagers, and teach them about Islam in schools than it is to teach them about Christianity, how to respect others instead of killing them, and to not act like a slut by age 15.

      Seems you either have issues with the United States providing more freedom than your own country (which you neglected to mention in your rant about us) or you just have issues with Christians and feel that the U.S. is failing because of their sheer existence rather than their decreasing visibility and influence in American society. You failed to mention the correlation between the latter and the U.S's current situation.

      Considering fewer Americans every year believe that homosexuality is sin, that abortion is wrong, that religion is important, and that proper parenting (setting rules for children to follow, keeping a watchful eye on them, caring for them, and an even distribution of male/female organs) is important, it is hard to imagine there are people like you who think that the laws of this nation are actually causing our downfall. You obviously haven't looked at the situation entirely. Maybe you have biases that prevent you from doing so?

      Do you mind if I just blatantly copy-paste this text of yours every time I have to explain to someone why americans are considered a bunch of fucking idiots by the rest of the enlightened world? Would save a lot of time.

      Oh, and just for reference, I'm Dutch. You know, the pot-smoking, booby-ogling, drinking at 16, gun-forbidding socialist hippies who considered the views your country are based on just right...a few centuries ago. Heck, we invented half of them. We stopped munching magic mushrooms though...some american kid came over and died taking them.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    102. Re:Hypocricy by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      How is that immature? I don't enjoy the taste of wine or beer. I never have. I drink mixed drinks but I don't enjoy the taste of them enough to drink them on their own. I'll drink water if I'm not drinking alcohol. If I could find a 'drunk pill' that would offer the same effects of drinking without actually drinking, I'd switch to that instead.

      On nights that I do drink, 3 drinks doesn't phase me. As in I don't get the mental response that I do with more drinks. So my entire point was if I only get 3 drinks or I know I'm going to be driving later I'll just stick to the 0 proof stuff. If I Am going out and I am going to be drinking then 3 drinks is useless.

      In the words of Hank Williams Jr.
      why do you drink? to get drunk
      why do you roll smoke? to get stoned
      Why must you live out the songs you wrote? to get laid

    103. Re:Hypocricy by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I am well over 18 but I do feel that restricting legal adults drinking is wrong.
      If you are old enough to sign contracts, get married, and no longer under the juvenile court system then you are an adult.
      Heck I don't think anybody should drink or smoke regardless of age but making the drinking age 21 just seems wrong to me from a legal point of view. But then I think trying anyone under 18 as an adult is also wrong.
      Just my way of looking at things.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    104. Re:Hypocricy by Knara · · Score: 1

      Well, that's a direct result of how we socialize drinking in the US, obviously.

      However, binge drinking is not synonymous with alcoholism (it's not HEALTHY, but it's also not the same thing). Not that you could notice by looking at google for information. I found one 1st-2nd page result that told me if I desire alcohol more than twice a month, I'm an alcoholic.

    105. Re:Hypocricy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sign me up for three tours!

      What will you do when those 90 seconds are over?

    106. Re:Hypocricy by CFTM · · Score: 1

      I would argue that the purpose of a law is provide for the greater good of a society; that is afterall the reason why we enter in to a social contract with a given government. We believe that our quality of life and livelihood can and will be protected. The natural consequence of this, is that laws are not meant to legislate "morality" rather to protect the sanctity of the social contract. Consequently, prohibition has no place in legislation; I can see arguments for restriction (have to be 18) but not for things to be illegal. It ends up being a huge waste of tax dollars and putting undo burden on the system, oh but I always forget that the prison system in the US has become mostly for-profit business thus the more folks we lock up the better...and what's the best way to create more criminals? Make things illegal that have no business being illegal. Just my two cents...

      Not to mention the amount of money wasted on the War on Drugs and villainization programs such as DARE.

    107. Re:Hypocricy by Karellen · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think I'm just using different terminology that you :)

      To me, to "provide for the greater good of society" and to desire "that our quality of life and livelihood can and will be protected" is a valid ethical argument. It's not a personal moral (a word I don't like as it has connotations of mandated religious dogma, and not something that can be rationally studied, debated and updated, which I think ethics should be) argument, but is still an ethical argument.

      po-tay-to, po-tah-to.

      --
      Why doesn't the gene pool have a life guard?
  7. Life Expectancy by BeerCur · · Score: 2, Funny

    Question: What's the life expectancy of a WII and TV in a dingy basement and a bunch of drunk college kids around?

    Answer: You mean if by some chance it's not stolen first? Not Long.

    --
    It's not what your Sig can do for you, but what you can do for your for your Sig.
  8. Tapper by Fishbulb · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is exactly what happened to the old video game 'Tapper', where you played a bartender serving thirsty customers. Originally licensed by Budweiser. They had to give it a face lift after parents complained (originally targeted for bars, it got into places it probably shouldn't have been in) to Root Beer Tapper.
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapper

    1. Re:Tapper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (Damn! I was beaten to the punch! :)

      In 1983, Bally/Midway had the same problem with the coin-op game Tapper, in which you served Budweiser to queues of thirsty patrons.

      Great game to have at your local bar, but because the games were also sold to arcades in which minors were present, overzealous legislators forced Bally to produce a bowdlerized version of the game (new side art, new marquee, and all in-game graphics suitably redone) to Root Beer Tapper.

      It seems that everything old is new again. Happy 25th Anniversary, Tapper!

    2. Re:Tapper by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, in the end this measure did not end up protecting the children. Root Beer Tapper's promotion of the consumption of massive quantities of high fructose corn syrup was one of the primary causes behind the current epidemic of childhood obesity.

      Parents should have insisted on converting the game to "Celery Juice Tapper".

    3. Re:Tapper by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      Which in turn caused high rates of suicide :)

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    4. Re:Tapper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course, the most outrageous part of that game was that the bartender served people before carding them!

    5. Re:Tapper by wikthemighty · · Score: 1

      And the Commodore 64 version has you serving Mountain Dew...

      --
      "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
  9. Nanny State by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We really need to kill off this nanny state we live in before the next generation is too afraid to go outside at all.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Nanny State by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...before the next generation is too afraid to go outside at all.

      That would surely be the death of /.

    2. Re:Nanny State by tristian_was_here · · Score: 1

      Too late I bet many /.ers have never seen real sunlight.

      I cant wait for the day I see real people!

    3. Re:Nanny State by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      So, it's not ok to have some beer, but it's ok to stuff your face to the point of throwing up.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    4. Re:Nanny State by Knara · · Score: 1

      We really need to kill off this nanny state we live in before the next generation is too afraid to go outside at all.

      QFT

      I was slightly too young to fully enjoy the 80's, but at least in the 80s, people weren't shit scared of every damn thing out there. (Sadly, that's where we started to be scared of it all, though)

    5. Re:Nanny State by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, not without a cup of water to make sure I am not dehydrated.

    6. Re:Nanny State by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Elections in 3 months. So, raise your hands everyone: who is going to vote for fascists? Oh. I didn't expect so many hands. :(

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  10. Let me get this stright? by Higaran · · Score: 1

    Ok, I get the game has you bouncing the ball in cups of water, but you can overdose if you drink too much water. So shouldn't parents still be pissed off because the game is still portraying something that you can do that could kill your self. I mean usually if you drink too much beer you pass out, so wouldn't drinking too much water be worse. Hmm, I'm confused, maybe becasue I don't have kids yet. Could some one please explain it to me.

    1. Re:Let me get this stright? by icegreentea · · Score: 1

      If you read TFA, you'll find that one college actually had to ban water pong too (which they had 'replaced' beer pong with). Because of water intoxication. Go figure.

    2. Re:Let me get this stright? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Drinking too much beer is fun, drinking too much water is not fun. So this is clearly motivated by nothing other than a puritanical fear of fun.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  11. C'mon people by seanonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't we all just get a pong?

    1. Re:C'mon people by mounthood · · Score: 1

      Can't we all just get a pong?

      I'm sorry but pings like this shouldn't be allow to pass.

      --
      tomorrow who's gonna fuss
  12. Fuel up your helicopters parents... by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because your adult "child" might play this game away from home! Gotta protect the "kids", right? Why is it video games are the new evil that's replaced song lyrics?

    Here's a message to the helicopter parents: Let Go.

    --
    AccountKiller
    1. Re:Fuel up your helicopters parents... by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Because your adult "child" might play this game away from home! Gotta protect the "kids", right? Why is it video games are the new evil that's replaced song lyrics?

      The original problem is that the game was rated T for Teen, yet featured alcohol consumption.

      It is still rated T for Teen, but now features water consumption.
      Problem solved.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Fuel up your helicopters parents... by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, Mario supports animal cruelty, and is rated E! WE CANNOT HAVE OUR CHILDREN CRUSHING TURTLES!

      --
      I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
    3. Re:Fuel up your helicopters parents... by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      Not to mention eating mushrooms....

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    4. Re:Fuel up your helicopters parents... by Blackhalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Why is it video games are the new evil that's replaced song lyrics?"

      What a wonderful question! I often ponder what the sociological/psychological motivation it is that drives a portion of the population to vilify imaginary evils. Whether it be witches or video games, comic books or Dungeons & Dragons, Alcohol or Rock & Roll, fluoridation or immunization; there seems to be a segment of the population that needs some imaginary social ill to oppose. Why these do gooders can not focus on something real and meaningful like government corruption or mentally illness induced poverty, I can not imagine.

      I'd be inclined to call it Chicken Little Syndrome, but Google tells me that a whole host of people are laying claim to that title.

      Is it just me, or does this ailment largely affect Soccer moms?

      --
      "There is nothing to do it. But to do it." -Floyd Pepper
    5. Re:Fuel up your helicopters parents... by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      WoW is rated T for Teen, and also features alcohol consumption. Why aren't they raising a fuss about that, too? Guess I shouldn't give them ideas, though...

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    6. Re:Fuel up your helicopters parents... by sir+fer · · Score: 1

      Whether it be witches or video games, comic books or Dungeons & Dragons, Alcohol or Rock & Roll, fluoridation or immunization

      two of these things are not like the other and a demonstrably harmful. Witches, video games, comic books, Dungeons & Dragons, alcohol or rock music pale in comparison to the harmful effects of adding rat-poison to water and injecting ethyl-mercury and pathogens directly into the blood stream.

      --
      Debian FTW ;o)
    7. Re:Fuel up your helicopters parents... by Blackhalo · · Score: 1

      Except that mercury has not been used since the 70's, fluoride exists in some regions water naturally at levels above the additive and the health benefits for both FAR outweigh the risks. Just like violent video games may actually be harmful to some small insignificant portion of the population but that does not override the entertainment value for the rest.

      --
      "There is nothing to do it. But to do it." -Floyd Pepper
    8. Re:Fuel up your helicopters parents... by BlueHands · · Score: 1

      hahahahahahahahahaha.
      ahem, sorry. But to prove his point so directly - just excellent. I truly hope it was sarcasm, but it didn't come off that way....

      --
      I mod everyone down who says "I'll get modded down for this." I hate to disappoint.
  13. They forgot to... by nebaz · · Score: 4, Funny

    change the pong paddles to flowers, because you could hit someone over the head and hurt them with paddles.

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    1. Re:They forgot to... by the_weasel · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am allergic to flowers you insensitive clod. :-)

      --
      - sarcasm is just one more service we offer -
    2. Re:They forgot to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My two best firends died becasue of flowers, you insensitive clod...... omg a digg/slashdot crossover meme, KILL IT NOW

  14. Priorities by thedullroar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All the time these parents spend writing angry letters could be put to use parenting . Talk to your kids about things they shouldn't do (like drink alcohol) and why they shouldn't do them. If you don't want your kid playing that game in the house, don't buy it. If you don't want them playing it at a friend's house, know your kids' friends and their parents. If they are reasonable people, they will honor a request that certain things not be on the activity list when Jimmy comes over to play. And if you've done a good job parenting so far, playing virtual pong isn't going to turn your kid into a hooligan.

    --
    Didn't your mother teach you not to do things you would be ashamed to see on the evening news?
    1. Re:Priorities by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But little Jimmy will eventually turn from the sweet angel he is now to some sort of brat. It's called puberty. But since Jimmy's parents can't accept that their baby ain't no baby anymore (which only makes that puberty problem worse, btw), something else has to take the blame. THEY of course didn't do anything wrong. Even if Jimmy decides that H is a great because it lets him take a break from this perpetual pain called reality, it can't be that his parents didn't give a rat's ass about his wellbeing, only cared for his grades (after all, they only want the best for him and that means the best job, and why can't you be like Jacky next door, he has straight As), didn't listen when he told them he's being bullied (after all his teachers said everything's all right, probably he just didn't want to go to school, lazy little bastard)...

      So it's not them, obviously. So it's something else. Preferably something his parents don't understand and especially don't understand Jimmy's fascination with it. Since TV is something they grew up with, and dad just loved those metal songs (and he turned out allright, after all), it has to be something else. It's certainly computer games.

      I really wonder what's going to be our scapegoat when our kids turn into those pubertal monsters.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Priorities by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      If they are reasonable people, they will honor a request that certain things not be on the activity list when Jimmy comes over to play.

      I'd say reasonable people don't really want to try to parent by some other parents rules. We're not talking about hardcore pornography here, it's a silly beer pong game. Do I get to enforce equally silly rules on other parents, such as "don't let Johnny watch any Fox News when he's over there.. we don't want to poison his mind with that garbage". Yah think the "Fox News" watching parents might be more than a little offended by that request?

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Priorities by thedullroar · · Score: 1
      This beer pong game is not a good example. If someone asked me not to let Jimmy play pong on the Wii, I would probably laugh out loud. But those people probably only let their kids play with people from their church. Anyway, as a general idea, I don't think it is unreasonable. Of course, the person on the receiving end is entitled to say "They're N years old. I don't actively supervise all of my child's activities." Whereupon the paranoid parent can suggest that the kids play at their house instead.

      Do I get to enforce equally silly rules on other parents, such as "don't let Johnny watch any Fox News when he's over there.. we don't want to poison his mind with that garbage". Yah think the "Fox News" watching parents might be more than a little offended by that request?

      [Substitute playing GTA for watching Fox to get a scenario that might actually happen] If you don't demonize people for making different choices for their children, they're significantly more likely to respect the choices you make.

      --
      Didn't your mother teach you not to do things you would be ashamed to see on the evening news?
    4. Re:Priorities by servognome · · Score: 1

      Do I get to enforce equally silly rules on other parents, such as "don't let Johnny watch any Fox News when he's over there.. we don't want to poison his mind with that garbage". Yah think the "Fox News" watching parents might be more than a little offended by that request?

      No, a good reasonable parent would respect the boundaries other parents set for their children. It's like a parent asking that their child not have to attend church sunday morning if they stay over on a saturday night.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    5. Re:Priorities by sir+fer · · Score: 1

      why shouldn't they drink? Get a life you basement dweller!

      --
      Debian FTW ;o)
    6. Re:Priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a reasonable and sensible request. Fox news is the worst place to get news. I wish you could sue Fox News for falsely advertising that they are fair or balanced.

  15. Censorship by rtechie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This issue perfectly illustrates why we need strong laws protecting freedom of speech. Just having the 1st Ammendment isn't enough. If there was a federal law saying you can't sue over video game content, NO MATTER WHAT, this game would have been released as intended. The fact that you can sue somebody because you're "offended" is nonsense.

  16. Guns 'n' alchohol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's statements like this that make me support gun control.

    If you can't hit your target while drunk, you don't have gun control

  17. Most free? Who claims that? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1

    By just about any measure, USA is far from 'most free'. For example, look at: http://www.rsf.org/article.php3?id_article=8247 where USA ranks 31 below , most of Europe and many others. Sure, it might beat China or Zimbabwe, but you'd hope that USA would try to compare itself with people nearer the top of the list.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Most free? Who claims that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point is more that the US tends to be very loud about how free it is. As a citizen, I definitely notice that.

  18. Not despite. Because. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    You don't have numbers of people behind bars despite strict laws but because. You don't have high teen pregnancies despite but because a lack of sensible sex ed.

    That's basically what it comes down to. You know who profits most from strict porn laws? Porn makers. Actually, not only them, but generally the whole movie industry. You can show drivel like Baywatch and you'll have horny teens glued to the screen for the chance of seeing some boobs, at least through the bathing suit. You know what? The show bombed big time here, we have boobs when we want them, and, well, let's say Baywatch wasn't really the show that you'd watch for the story, ok?

    Who profits most from strict alc laws? Breweries. Because you can sell whatever crap piss and call it beer and people will still buy it (trust me, I come from a country with less strict laws concerning alc and your beer simply IS NONE). No need to go for quality or taste, people will buy the crap anyway because, ya know, it's alcohol... the big man stuff that you only get when you're 21.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Not despite. Because. by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Erm... this was my point, dude. The US's prohibitionist approach to many social problems usually exacerbates, or even causes, these problems.

      BTW, where is 'here'?

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    2. Re:Not despite. Because. by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 2, Informative

      While not arguing with your major point, the regional craft breweries in the US have reversed the trend of shitty American beer. We are now awash in quite decent beers. I say this as someone who drank my way through Germany. It would be arrogant (and inaccurate) to assert that our beers and wines are better than the rest of the world's, but we have many that are quite good, and that often win top prizes in world wide tastings.

      If you ever make it to the Pacific Northwest, I encourage you to sample the Widmer, Red Hook, or Full Sail offerings.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    3. Re:Not despite. Because. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Small place, appears not to be on most American maps, we like to call it "The Rest Of The World".

      Come visit some time, tell your friends about it.

      Not personal, just observational.

    4. Re:Not despite. Because. by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      Who profits most from strict alc laws? Breweries. Because you can sell whatever crap piss and call it beer and people will still buy it (trust me, I come from a country with less strict laws concerning alc and your beer simply IS NONE). No need to go for quality or taste, people will buy the crap anyway because, ya know, it's alcohol... the big man stuff that you only get when you're 21.

      That is the worst leap of logic I have ever seen. We have crappy beer here because Americans are willing to settle for crap. It has absolutely nothing to do with our alcohol laws. Pay attention sometime: Americans buy crappy clothes, cars, computers, whatever, as long as it's cheap. We even settle for getting bent over by the cell phone companies (unlike the Europeans), and that isn't even cheap! Saying our crappy beer is due to alcohol laws is absolutely false. The logical conclusion would be that we have more underage drinking because of our alcohol laws, not crappy beer.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    5. Re:Not despite. Because. by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm not from the US myself. So, where are you from? I really want to know which country didn't like Baywatch ;)

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    6. Re:Not despite. Because. by operagost · · Score: 1

      Don't waste your breath with the Europeans. They've spent generations propping up the "all American beer is piss" meme and refuse to reevaluate it.

      On a side note, all Germans are goose-stepping fascists, all Brits have nasty teeth, and the French are surrender monkeys.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    7. Re:Not despite. Because. by sir+fer · · Score: 1

      Also a large prison population makes for a VERY cheap labour force. Where I come from we spell labour with a U!

      --
      Debian FTW ;o)
    8. Re:Not despite. Because. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Here in Germany Baywatch did succeed despite porn being very available. Might've had other reasons though.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    9. Re:Not despite. Because. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Don't waste your breath with the Europeans. They've spent generations propping up the "all American beer is piss" meme and refuse to reevaluate it.

      All the American beer available here is piss. The bad reputation probably discourages importing of smaller, better American beers though (and import taxes and transport costs might also have something to do with it).

    10. Re:Not despite. Because. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      You have less under-16 drinking than the UK, where you must be 18 to purchase alcohol or consume it in a pub/nightclub:
      In the UK, "54% of 11-12 year olds said they drank at home or at someone else's home. 33% of 15 yr-olds drank alcohol in a pub or bar and 26% of 14-yr-olds said they drank at parties with friends."
      Another source: "The survey by the World Health Organisation also found that England and Wales ranked worst for alcohol abuse, with 58% of 15-year-old boys in Wales and 54% of girls drinking on a weekly basis, followed by 56% of boys and 49% of girls in England. Only 21% of American boys and 11% of girls drank. Not only were British youngsters drinking more often, they were also drinking more."

      We don't quite have the same kind of crappy American beers here in the UK because we have crap cider and spirits instead, and they sell very well, particularly to teenagers who are drinking to get drunk. The major supermarkets all have their own range of low-budget drinks, e.g. Tesco Value Vodka is 10/litre, compared to Smirnoff at 15/litre.
      Tesco Strong Cider is 89p/litre (in a massive 3l bottle), Tesco Value Dry Cider is 56p/litre. A decent cider is about 2/litre.

    11. Re:Not despite. Because. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's another problem I have with US beer, you can't even get drunk with that dishwater.

      Well, legal age here is 16. For drinking, that is. But that's gonna change soon, our thinkofthechildren crowd is hyping the problem of teen drinking a bit much to consider it just another bubbling of the "don't have anything better to do" people. The problem is blamed on alc laced soft drinks, which taste sweet and quite unlike beer, which is a bit more of a threshold for kids used to sweet soft drinks.

      Generally, though, I don't expect a change in our laws any time soon. Our alc lobby is pretty strong. So far they even managed to keep smoking bans out of bars, that alone should tell you something.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  19. Signed up by Tony · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can fuck for my country?! Sign me up for three tours!

    Senator Larry Craig will see you now, "Private" Flayer.

    --
    Microsoft is to software what Budweiser is to beer.
    1. Re:Signed up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can fuck for my country?! Sign me up for three tours!

      Senator Larry Craig will see you now, "Private" Flayer.

      Hang on. I think that he may be ineligible due to his "Flayer" being Red...

  20. Write angry letters? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Write angry letters (not e-mail, honest to God hand-written letters) to your politician about how this is ridiculous and absurd. use the following hard facts:

    1. Drinking is a part of our culture. Hiding a part of culture from someone until they're well over maturity creates a dangerous situation, because people haven't yet learned how to handle these things. Aliens, there's xenophobia (kill the evil dangerous things!); covering up all violence, people lose self-esteem and confidence and crumble under stress (ohgod he's threatening to break my arm give him whatever he wants *cry cry* don't even THINK about helping someone else in trouble either way too dangerous wtf); alcohol, they'll seek out the contraband as kids and get into car accidents, or become alcoholics as adults.

    2. Companies can market what they want. Parents need to control their kids; without actually raising kids, you can't control them. Imagine if parents simply didn't bother with keeping their kids off drugs; now imagine schools censored all things about drugs. Oh, what's this magic dust? It'll make me happy? Hmm... :) Even with school lectures, kids only really pay much attention to their parents when making decisions like that.

    3. I find it offensive that you can breed without a license. I have to learn all the important points of driving (traffic signs, danger and hazard conditions) to drive; you should need to learn all the important points of parenting to have a kid. You need a license to get married already, but no training; put dick A in pussy B.

    Really, what the fuck is so hard about this? "Angry parents whine to congress/nintendo about how they don't want to have to keep something away from their kids or try to teach their kids what that something might deviate them into doing" okay so "Angry parents bitch at congress/nintendo about this gross distortion of responsibility and accountability."

    1. Re:Write angry letters? by PReDiToR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're so nearly there, you just didn't connect the dots.

      "They" want us to breed (3) so that we can do more consuming (2) and won't know any better if we stay indoors and don't fraternise with each other (1).

      Take this framework and apply every new law you hear to it and sooner or later you will have a tinfoil hat like the rest of us.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  21. It's not as bad as you think... by spook+brat · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to Federal law the armed forces can allow drinking by service members as young as 18 on bases in or near locations where the legal age limit is lower than 21 - the military enforces the local drinking age laws. The degree to which such leniency is actually applied differs from service to service (if you're in the Air Force, you're out of luck), but the Army and marines have been pretty good about such things.

    --
    Travel the Galaxy! Meet fascinating life forms... ...and kill them - http://schlockmercenary.com
    1. Re:It's not as bad as you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if the local law forbids all drinking, regardless of age? They can't drink at all?

    2. Re:It's not as bad as you think... by dbcad7 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, back when I was a 18 year old youngster in the Army (a very long time ago) we had a beer machine in the barracks.. but we didn't use it much, cause being in Germany at the time, there were better beers than that canned American crap.. I was also in Kentucky before the laws you posted passed.. I imagine that covers the EM club, and PX, but I am willing to bet they still have beer machines in the barracks.. which don't ID anybody.

      --
      waiting for ad.doubleclick.net
    3. Re:It's not as bad as you think... by ZiakII · · Score: 1

      As a former Marine that got out only a year ago, they don't have beer machines in the barracks in the states, but of course anyone there turns a blind eye if someone underage is drinking. But for special events such as the Marine Corps Birthday Ball they let you consume alcohol as long as your SNCO/OIC (bosses) approve of it and you have someone to drive you back. When I went to Japan apparently the drinking age there is 19, Marines who were 19 could then buy beer/liquor on base and off base, without a problem.

    4. Re:It's not as bad as you think... by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      Then they'll just do it on the US base and claim it as US soil, enforcing US laws ;)

    5. Re:It's not as bad as you think... by IBBoard · · Score: 1

      I'd be surprised if the Army and Marines didn't let you drink. After all, what group of squadies is complete without some big drinking sessions? I just hope for the sake of the Americans that they don't make them drink American beer. If they're posted in Germany (or even Europe) at least let them drink some proper stuff!

    6. Re:It's not as bad as you think... by Otter+Popinski · · Score: 1

      I think the only place in the US to take advantage of this was Fort Bliss in El Paso, TX, and the rules there changed recently. The drinking age was lowered to 18 because young soldiers were getting hammered across the Mexican border (where the drinking age is 18) and getting into trouble. Leadership decided it was better to just let them do it at home and have at least some supervision.

      Again, they no longer do this at Fort Bliss, so AFAIK it's no longer done anywhere in the US.

  22. Society's priorities by Pincus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thank god I can still play all sorts of games where I steal and kill all sorts of things. It's probably a good thing I can't play those games after playing beer pong, too, since getting tipsy might through off my aim. Better still, if I make a game where kids vote in an election, will I need to change it from a presidential election to a student council election? I wouldn't want to teach any kids to break the law by voting underage.

    1. Re:Society's priorities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe, but how likely are you to shoot someone with a real gun, compared to drinking and driving? There are about a thousand gun deaths in America every year, but 25,000 alcohol-related accidents every year.

      Statistics

    2. Re:Society's priorities by andy.ruddock · · Score: 1

      Kind of assuming that real-life behaviour automatically follows from in-game behaviour.

      --
      God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
    3. Re:Society's priorities by rugatero · · Score: 1

      There are about a thousand gun deaths in America every year

      Not exactly. In 2005 there were over 30,000 firearms related deaths.

      --
      This comment is for entertainment purposes only. Any similarity to real insight or information is purely coincidental.
  23. Weak! by billcopc · · Score: 1

    What's the rationale behind them caving in ? So there are a bunch of extremist parents who complained, but they always do! You could give them a video game where you plant trees, and they'd manage to find suggestive phallic themes in the seed/plant/bug things...

    Why couldn't this company just say a nice big "Fuck You" and release their game as originally designed and titled ? No one's forcing these church nuts to buy the damned thing, and it's not like the average underage kid can afford their own games.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  24. Across the USA most swimming prohibited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I live in the NJ home to over 1,000 lakes.

    To actually swim in any of them you have live in the same town and pay a hefty membership fee, or if you love out of town you pay an even higher fee. Just so they can pay for a lifeguard to man a small mud pond.

  25. Nintendo cuts it losses by westlake · · Score: 1
    If there was a federal law saying you can't sue over video game content, NO MATTER WHAT, this game would have been released as intended.
    .

    Nintendo sells a console for family oriented social gaming.

    Nintendo doesn't need or want a well-publicized association with the frat party beer blast - which it would get from the day the game was first announced.

    1. Re:Nintendo cuts it losses by CastrTroy · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a good thing there aren't any violent games for the Wii.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Nintendo cuts it losses by rtechie · · Score: 1

      Possibly. We'll never know because of the outside pressure Nintendo faces.

      It's unlikely this title will be picked up by the other, less "family friendly", consoles because they face the same pressures. THere is virtually no sexual content in video games. And it's certainly not because of the lack of demand, it's because of outside pressure groups. Remember the stir over "Hot Coffee" and the sex scenes in Mass Effect?

  26. What I don't understand... by ToadMan8 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is what the brew-ha-ha is all about.

    --
    I haven't posted in so long, my sig is out of date.
  27. You missed one! by GoombaTroopa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Okami is rated T, and that teaches your children that drinking sake makes you strong!

    Ban this game now before it breeds a generation of sake-drinking hooligans who spend their days drawing circles around plants!

  28. ACTUALLY RATED E! by jakepmatthews · · Score: 0

    the site says it's rated E http://www.fratpartygames.com/ so wtf? now children can start practicing beer pong young? big victory for overprotective parents!

  29. Wii Game Party already does this? by TriggerFin · · Score: 1

    Other than the cups being "empty," how does this differ from "Ping Cup" in Game Party?

    --
    Here's your sig.
  30. Wow. Beer Pong On Slash Dot? by Layth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I compete in a lot of beer pong tournaments.
    In fact I fly out to vegas every year for the world series (mentioned in article) and even placed top 10 for 2008.

    Bizarre to see something like pong make its way onto slash dot.
    There is another wii variant called Ping Cup in some type of party games package as well.

    Personally I don't see the point to either simulations, since beer pong is ridiculously simple to set up an ACTUAL game in person.
    All it takes is cups and ping pong balls! Why are you in front of a television - the game is supposed to be social.

    Anyway, I can chime in on one aspect that most slashdotters are probably unaware of.
    Beer Pong is extremely competitive. When you go to tournaments, it has nothing to do with getting drunk.

    Make that shot and win that money. World series is 50k. Smaller local tournaments are 500-6,000 in prize money for 1st.
    These politicians need to leave my game alone, damnit.

    Beer Pong is not a crime.
    The assholes are making me irked at my own country and envy other places' freedoms.

    1. Re:Wow. Beer Pong On Slash Dot? by mxs · · Score: 1

      Anyway, I can chime in on one aspect that most slashdotters are probably unaware of.
      Beer Pong is extremely competitive. When you go to tournaments, it has nothing to do with getting drunk.

      You are 100% correct. It has everything to do with getting drunk ... FOR MONEY ! :-)

      Make that shot and win that money. World series is 50k. Smaller local tournaments are 500-6,000 in prize money for 1st.

      Face it, in the end it is still about being drunk, but at least you can afford a few rounds for your friends :P

    2. Re:Wow. Beer Pong On Slash Dot? by EvolutionsPeak · · Score: 1

      Playing Wii is supposed to be social and beer pong can be messy. That's the only reasoning I can think of.

    3. Re:Wow. Beer Pong On Slash Dot? by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Do you drink beer in your version of beer pong? If so, how do you make it to the final round?

    4. Re:Wow. Beer Pong On Slash Dot? by Layth · · Score: 1

      Organized tournaments never mandate the drinking of beer.
      That's just asking to be sued.

      Most people I know feel like drinking moderate amounts of beer helps them to play better.
      I tend to agree, insofar as a slight buzz will help calm your nerves and allow you to focus.

      It's all about moderation.
      As your posts implies, drinking past a certain point will generally start working against you.

    5. Re:Wow. Beer Pong On Slash Dot? by Twisp · · Score: 1

      All it takes is cups and ping pong balls!

      Wrong. It also requires a reasonable amount of space. Not a TON of space, but often enough to require re-arrangement of furniture, as younger folks usually have limited space.

      Do you drink beer in your version of beer pong? If so, how do you make it to the final round?

      I'm not sure how it works in tournament, but in everyday beer pong, the better you play, the less you drink. The goal is to get the ping-pong ball in your opponents cup, which they then have to drink. If your opponent sucks, or if you are good enough that they never have a chance to shoot, you might not have to drink at all. Your opponent, on the other hand...

    6. Re:Wow. Beer Pong On Slash Dot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I placed first.

      Oh shit, this isn't the troll thread...

    7. Re:Wow. Beer Pong On Slash Dot? by Longwalker-MGO · · Score: 1

      Personally I don't see the point to either simulations, since beer pong is ridiculously simple to set up an ACTUAL game in person. All it takes is cups and ping pong balls! Why are you in front of a television - the game is supposed to be social.

      This is actually quite simple. This game is for teenagers who, for some reason, can not get hold of alcohol and want to pretend they are acting like grownups by getting smashed and being stupid.

      After all, with all the drinking that goes on in WoW (Can you guys make any holiday not have alcohol all over the place?) how many of the people that sit there and "get drunk" in game are of age? If someone is of age to drink or has free access to alcohol even if they are underage, they will drink the real stuff, not "simulate" drinking on a game.

    8. Re:Wow. Beer Pong On Slash Dot? by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking that if:

      Wiimote + TV = Bad news

      then

      Wiimote + TV + Beer = VERY bad news, but seemed like a good idea and was hilarious at the time.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  31. Probably For The Best by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 3, Funny

    Faithfully recreating the beer pong experience would involve your Wii giving you a nasty week-long cold that you get from the other players who drink from your virtual cup of beer.

  32. Tapper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tapper

  33. Beer Pong? JV Games? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had anyone heard of this game before?
    Now they're on ./. Good marketing.

  34. Noone has asked the more important question... by BPPG · · Score: 1

    Will it have online play?

    --
    What's the value of information that you don't know?
  35. They are censoring a beer pong video game by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No there are no black choppers.

    The new prohibitionists and censors are real. That's why this story is on Slashdot. Because they are censoring a beer pong video game.

    1. Re:They are censoring a beer pong video game by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

      I just hope they don't put a ban on space invaders because it encourages shooting at extra-terrestrials...but if that day does come, god help us all because its just what the alien's have been banking on.

  36. Nice burn by Caboosian · · Score: 1

    Ping!

    1. Re:Nice burn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PING: transmit failed
      PING: transmit failed
      PING: transmit failed
      PING: transmit failed

      Ping statistics for 1096069: Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 0, Lost =4 (100% loss)

  37. You know.. by The+Dancing+Panda · · Score: 1

    I thought about writing this game a year or so ago. The Wiimote is suited perfectly.

    Where I come from, Beer Pong is played with paddles. The proper name for the game in question is Beirut (Bey-root). I've been playing it for probably 8 years now. It's the game of the people, at my university.

    We have 2 monumental games here at State Tech. Beirut is the Game of the People. Anyone can play, and even a lucky new person can feasably win. Our other game is Beer Die, which is the Game of the Gods. Typically, you won't win a game (without a very skilled partner), for at least your first 20 games, and that's if you're a quick learner.

    I wanted to write these for the Wii, because the Wiimote fits both quite well. Unfortunately, I missed my chance. Multiplayer would be sweet if you couldn't find a suitable sized table to play IRL.

    BTW, we do have lots of other games we play. These are just the 2 games that have some sort of status. I don't know if that makes sense. I'm drunk right now.

  38. Re:Hypocrisy by sir+fer · · Score: 2, Funny

    have been circumscribed

    circumcised , my boy circumcised .

    I am a circumcised male and consider it nothing less than genital mutilation

    --
    Debian FTW ;o)
  39. drinking video games by flightofsong · · Score: 1

    This game has nothing on drinking bomberman or drinking life-force, or drinking 'any game where you have to drink when you lose a life'.

  40. WTF.....?! by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Next up on the "To Ban/Outlaw" list:

    1) Rock N' Roll (it's the Devil's music, and can lead to the downfall of society)
    2) Skirts that show women's ankles (wearing anything shorter encourages pornography)
    2) Unbuttoned Shirt Collars (shows too much skin on men)
    3) Harsh Language (degrades society)
    4) Marshmallow "Peeps" (people can choke while playing games with them)
    5) Four-letter words in Scrabble (can lead to offensive language and degraes society)
    6) Contact sports (can lead to severe injury and/or death)
    7) Cheese (can cause cholesterol problems)
    8) Personal Opinions (can lead to violent conflicts and social disruptions)
    9) Anything Sharp (can cause severe injury and/or death)
    10) Self-Defense (can lead to severe injury and/or death of the attacker/criminal)
    11) Dirt/soil (since it contains dagerous germs and microbes, such as anthrax and E. Coli)
    12) Trees (falling out of them can lead to severe injury and/or death)
    13) Bicycles (sice they can cause injury to the user and can be a hazard to other traffic)
    Better yet, why don't we just lock up everyone under the age of 40 in padded rooms and straight jackets because they might hurt themselves and/or someone else??!

    As prestigeous elitist as Georgetown is, they should have realized the lawsuits that they could face from this, since they, and anyone else, cannot prohibit lawful activities taking place within a private dwelling, since dorms, apartments, and student housing are technically private dwellings/residences. It would be the same as banning having sex or playing the Marshmallow Peeps Game in someones apartment/room/housing/etc.

    This would be a "losing" legal battle for a campus that tries to prohibit this, but "winning" in the sense that no student can afford to defend themselves.

    My school prohibits kegs, since they are considered "Mass Delivery" devices, but that only means you cant have a 'keg' (not counting those 'mini-kegs' you see at 7-11), and you can have as much alcohol as you and your buddies can afford. You can have a truckload of any kind of alcohol, but no kegs. Sorta makes sense, but they are not restricting alcohol or access to it by legal drinkers. If you live in the regular dorms, and have a roomie that is under 21, there must be at least 1 door, not including refrigerator doors (I already tried that) between the alcohol and the person under 21 (the door doesn't have to be locked at all times though). If you live in the student apartments or student housing, you can have any kind of alcohol anywhere. Parties/gatherings of over 15 people require you to fill out a very simple slip stating that you understand and you agree to be responsible for keeping the party under control. Our Police Department even has a shuttle that will take you to and from (until 2am) the downtown bars for free so you don't have to drive drunk.

    The only real restrictions we have on alcohol is that you can't make your own, can't have a keg, and can't drink if you are a minor. Smoking is still O.K. as long as you are 25 feet from windows (State law).

    Out rules regarding alcohol are simple common sense. As long as someone can care for themselves or is not posing a real danger to others, they are allowed to have fun. The rules (with the exception of kegs) are just the same as any other city or town in California: No open containers in public (except for scheduled events), you must be able to care for yourself, you cannot drive drunk, no underage drinking, and you can't give or buy alcohol for minors.

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
    1. Re:WTF.....?! by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Smoking is still O.K. as long as you are 25 feet from windows (State law).

      I'm going to skip the obvious Microsoft joke I could make here, and instead ask a real question: Why does the law state you must be 25 feet from a window? That seems a little confusing - surely it'd be better to be smoking AT the window rather than far away in some place where the smoke can't get out?

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    2. Re:WTF.....?! by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Ignore my previous comment, I just figured it out, and now feel very foolish! You must smoke at least 25 feet away from a window OUTSIDE... (sorry, I'm not used to the idea of not smoking inside!)

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  41. Re: "Sign me up" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure!

    Tour 1: Women over 400 lbs.
    Tour 2: Dudes in drag. Better bring a mask, 'cause you won't be pitching.
    Tour 3: All the remaining Second Ladies: Judy, Betty(*), Happy, Joan, Barbara(*), Marilyn, Tipper, and Lynne. In. That. Order. (* = Bonus, cuz they were also first ladies.)

  42. Clear liquid?? by Timosch · · Score: 1

    "filling its pixelated cups with water instead"
    Scandal! It could be Vodka!

    1. Re:Clear liquid?? by steveo777 · · Score: 1

      In that case we had better ban all clear liquids in video games. Can't use colored clear liquids either, those could be mixed drinks... Soon, the only thing that will ever appear will be that Blue Milk from Star Wars. I can't think of any alcoholic beverages that look like blue milk.

      --
      This sig isn't original enough, it's time to come up with something witty...
  43. War Against Virtual Beer Pong? by houghi · · Score: 1

    You use the word war, but i don't think it means what you think it means.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  44. Pong *Toss*? Not heard of the slang? by IBBoard · · Score: 1

    So instead of beer they're going for personal sexual gratification?

    21. toss off,
    a. to accomplish quickly or easily.
    b. to consume rapidly, esp. to drink something up in one swallow: He tossed off a cocktail before dinner.
    c. British Slang. to masturbate.

    (http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/toss)

    Given that most complaining parents are quite happy for violence but not sexual content (e.g. no "soul-corrupting nipples" or it's an 18, but major violence only needs a 15) how can they remove alcohol and replace it with sex?

  45. Stolen from someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once upon a time we used to world proof our children, now it seems we want to child proof the world.

  46. Don't they mean virtual Beirut? by philipgar · · Score: 3, Informative

    Beer pong is a game played with paddles, throwing ping pong balls into triangles of cups is beirut.

    Phil

    1. Re:Don't they mean virtual Beirut? by JelloJoe · · Score: 1

      Yes, technically I guess you are correct, but Beer Pong has come to mean the same thing as beirut. No one plays with paddles anymore, it's a boring stupid game. They way I see it now, Beer Pong = 6 cups, Beirut = 10

    2. Re:Don't they mean virtual Beirut? by philipgar · · Score: 1

      the number of cups varies, but normally there are 15 cups. 5 in the back row forming the triangle, and of course 2 water cups on each side. The cups should be relatively small (none of the giant 16oz cups). The game should also be played 3v3.

      Of course, many different variants exist, but this is the common way I know.

      Phil

  47. Got skin? by jeepien · · Score: 1

    What kind of sad, shallow person is inspired by someone of a particular skin color becoming President?

    Umm, the kind that elected 43 presidents in a row that 'just happened' to all have a particular skin color? Coincidence? Yeah, prolly.

    1. Re:Got skin? by ResidntGeek · · Score: 1

      What's the difference? It's been four and a half decades - isn't it just about time we started judging people based on the content of their character?

      --
      ResidntGeek
  48. hehe by afkcpu · · Score: 1

    This is quite amusing considering it's just a video game. I don't agree with the approach of facist censorship. It just makes the subject even more 'bad-ass' and 'taboo'. So when kids do get to drink beer they will probably do it behind their parents back or on the street! Besides isn't drinking excess amounts of water in a short space of time also dangerous? :)

  49. More Stupidity from the Scared Mommy brigade by christ,+jesus+H · · Score: 1

    This is so stupid I dont even know where to begin [sigh]. It never ceases to amaze me the most out of touch people regarding children, are the ones who give birth to them . . .

    --
    Ohh spiteful one tell me who to smote and he shall be smolten!
  50. Thank God! by crhylove · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm very glad that parents and lawmakers are spending so much time on kids getting virtually drunk, virtually running over old ladies, and virtually killing hookers.

    Clearly, with global warming, increasing corporate consolidation in every industry, multiple wars and genocides planet-wide that we are either funding indirectly, directly, or directly a part of, a decline in the middle class that is readily apparent, a national debt that spiraled out of control under Reagan, and is now MUCH worse, species going extinct across almost every ecosystem, increasing levels of obesity, heart-disease, cancer, and genetic disorders, bread inflating in price over seven fold while the dollar deflates into toilet paper, irregular voting results, procedures, and a subsequent media black-out, questions about building seven, huge set-backs in education, a completely broken health care system, bogged down freeways and corporate toll roads, the sub-prime start of a NEW great depression, cameras on every street corner, and astronauts claiming there is higher intelligence in our region, it is refreshing to see that parents and lawmakers care about the important stuff, like virtual beer-pong. Clearly, their priorities are very much in order.

    Now if you'll excuse me, I'll go back to having a conversation that is being listened to about how my friend was practically raped at the airport by the DHS on my over-priced corporate cell phone that is giving me cancer. Have a nice fucking day.

    --
    I hold very few opinions. I hold information based on observation and fact. If you wish to disagree, please use facts.
  51. To all the alcoholics out there by Kibblet · · Score: 2, Informative

    For a lot of grown ups, drinking =/= getting drunk. There is a difference. The lawmakers are stupid, but so is everyone who can't see the difference between drinking and getting drunk.

    1. Re:To all the alcoholics out there by thedistrict · · Score: 1

      Agreed, there is a line there that is eventually illuminated when you age. Still though, this game seems kind of interesting, and is at heart I think harmless. It doesn't encourage drinking, but it's just as to play this game with water. Water pong perhaps...

  52. This game is already available for the WII!!!!!!!! by TheReverandND · · Score: 2, Informative

    Its called Ping Toss and its available on Game Party, available at the local sprawlmart for under 20 bucks! Released by Midway I believe, I'd have to go home and look.

  53. Have you guys seen this game? Seriously... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    I mean, I'm down with being outraged and all, but have you seen this thing? It looks, and sounds, terrible. It's hard to care that the game got castrated, given what a pathetic load it is in the first place.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  54. They don't understand... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    I honestly think that most people simply don't remember their teenage years in sufficient detail to understand what it means to be a teenager. They claim to understand, but their actions and attitudes speak otherwise.

    You don't understand me! Just leave me alone!

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  55. O Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, we are the only western nation. Mexico and Canada are states of the US, and the other 'places' don't count.

  56. Something else to consider... by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    Compare "Beer Pong" to "Major League Eating"

    - If you assume people are going to mimic what happens in the game, which do you suppose is more reckless?

    - Which game, overall, is more stupid?

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  57. Inordinate numbers of Ping-Pong balls by Thiez · · Score: 1

    > Last fall, Georgetown University banned beer pong, specially made beer-pong tables and inordinate numbers of Ping-Pong balls and any other alcohol-related paraphernalia in its on-campus dorms â" even in the rooms of students of legal drinking age.

    That's great. A ban on inordinate numbers of Ping-Pong balls 'and other alcohol-related paraphernalia'? How many balls do you need to play beer pong anyway? One? Are ping-pong balls alcohol-related paraphernalia? How about dice? I know drinking games that involve dice. And cards. Ban them! BAN THEM ALL!

    1. Re:Inordinate numbers of Ping-Pong balls by christ,+jesus+H · · Score: 1

      How about quarters LOL? Are they gonna ban quaters . . . can you even ban legal currency LOL?

      --
      Ohh spiteful one tell me who to smote and he shall be smolten!
  58. oblig starship troopers by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    Jean Rasczak: All right, let's sum up. This year in history, we talked about the failure of democracy. How the social scientists of the 21st Century brought our world to the brink of chaos. We talked about the veterans, how they took control and imposed the stability that has lasted for generations since. We talked about the rights and privileges between those who served in the armed forces and those who haven't, therefore called citizens and civilians.
    [to a student]
    Jean Rasczak: You. Why are only citizens allowed to vote?
    Student: It's a reward. Something the federation gives you for doing federal service.
    Jean Rasczak: No. Something given has no basis in value. When you vote, you are exercising political authority, you're using force. And force my friends is violence. The supreme authority from which all other authorities are derived.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  59. forbidden fruit by ncmathsadist · · Score: 1

    Our society's childish attitudes towards alcohol give drink a "forbidden fruit" appeal. We need to treat alcohol more rationally so it does not become an implement in the battle of adolescent indviduation. Until then, we will have more stupid binge drinking.

  60. You believe in Global Warming? by z00_miak · · Score: 1

    I ... believe in global warming, and condemn all censorship that finds the opposite

    While I suppose you could say that I too 'believe' in global warming, it distresses me that the pervasive attitude is that one can either believe or not believe in it. Stating belief in global warming is like stating belief in a round earth, it doesn't really matter that you believe it or not.

    At this point it is no longer a subject of debate, the earth is warming. There is almost not debate as to whether or not we contribute to the problem or if it's natural. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Control (IPCC) states that is is very likely (very likely is defined by the IPCC as 90% probable) that the causes are anthropogenic.

    Read more on the IPCC website.

    1. Re:You believe in Global Warming? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I stated this wrong, I should have stated I think there is anthropogenic warming, but I am open to evidence on the contrary.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  61. Playing to Lose by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wii sports golf made the best Wii drinking game in my opinion. Drink for every point over par and every point you opponents were under par. Good times...

    Sounds like a game you play to lose:

    Ford stared at Arthur, and Arthur was astonished to find that his will was beginning to weaken. He didn't realize that this was because of an old drinking game that Ford learned to play in the hyperspace ports that served the madranite mining belts in the star system of Orion Beta.

    The game was not unlike the Earth game called Indian Wrestling, and was played like this:

    Two contestants would sit either side of a table, with a glass in front of each of them.

    Between them would be placed a bottle of Janx Spirit (as immortalized in that ancient Orion mining song "Oh don't give me none more of that Old Janx Spirit/ No, don't you give me none more of that Old Janx Spirit/ For my head will fly, my tongue will lie, my eyes will fry and I may die/ Won't you pour me one more of that sinful Old Janx Spirit").

    Each of the two contestants would then concentrate their will on the bottle and attempt to tip it and pour spirit into the glass of his opponent -- who would then have to drink it.

    The bottle would then be refilled. The game would be played again. And again.

    Once you started to lose you would probably keep losing, because one of the effects of Janx spirit is to depress telepsychic power.

    As soon as a predetermined quantity had been consumed, the final loser would have to perform a forfeit, which was usually obscenely biological.

    Ford Prefect usually played to lose.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  62. War by mattpm · · Score: 1

    Does America really need another "War"?

  63. So let me get this straight by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I can play FPS games where I jack cars, murder/rob prostitutes, blow up buildings, and slaughter innocent civilians ... but I can't drink?

    Um ... Why?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  64. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anytime a game is active, a game official doesn't magically appear and MAKE someone drink the cup of beer if it is made. When I was in college we used water so we didn't have to mess with nasty beer and gross pong balls. People drank at their leisure and it was socially policed. Using the point that it incites binge drinking is absurd.

  65. yea mod me down but i have to say by KingBenny · · Score: 0

    ... (just look at the sig)

    --
    Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?