Slashdot Mirror


Ghostbusters Is First Film Released On USB Key

arcticstoat writes "Are you the USB keymaster? You could be soon if you pick up PNY's new 2GB USB flashdrive, which comes pre-loaded with Ghostbusters. A spokesperson for PNY explained that it comes with a form of DRM that prevents you from copying the movie. 'They have DRM protection,' explained the spokesperson, 'so customers can download the movie onto their laptop or PC if they wish, but they have to have the USB drive plugged in to watch the movie, as the DRM is locked in the USB drive.' The music industry has been playing around with USB flash drives for a few years now, but it hasn't been a massive success yet; will USB movies fare any better?"

448 comments

  1. terrible idea by hellfish006 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    no that is a terrible idea, the last thing I want is a ton of USB drives laying around while I try to find any form of media.

    1. Re:terrible idea by v1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      and let me guess, requires windows visa with the latest service pack (DRM++)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    2. Re:terrible idea by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Would you rather use an optical drive's power-sucking moving parts, especially while using a laptop? Sometimes we don't have der internets to get us movies on a whim.

    3. Re:terrible idea by tom17 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well apparently it works on Linux as well (As long as it has the right KERNAL)

      From Argos.co.uk.

      2GB storage.
      Plug and play.
      Compatible with Windows ME, 2008, XP, Mac OS, 8.6 and Higher, Linux, Kernal 2.4X and any operating system with a USB port.
      Compatible with USB 1.1 and 2.0.
      Size (H)2 (W)6.3 (D) 0.8cm.
      Black USB pendrive.
      Full length movie and link to argos website included.
      Full installation guide included.

      Although I guess that is wrong for the DRM stuff.

      Tom...

    4. Re:terrible idea by jedidiah · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would rather use the device and medium of my choosing without dongles.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:terrible idea by exley · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sounds just as easy if not easier than dealing with an optical disc in some kind of a case. Easier to store, easier to carry. Doesn't help if you prefer something that's just a file stored on your hard drive, but it does have portability going for it.

    6. Re:terrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      What would you do if your girlfriend came up to you with that preference?

    7. Re:terrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What would you do if your girlfriend came up to you with that preference?

      Ask to watch.

    8. Re:terrible idea by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That can be easily fixed.

      Get a 4 gig usb key instead, a DVD of ghostbusters and a copy of handbrake. (you will want to rip with settings that give you about 3.2gig because the film was created on very low grade film it cant be compressed hard without artifacts.)

      rip the dvd to a OPEN unencumbered codec. place on USB key.

      Voila. same thing in BETTER quality without the DRM and is compatible with most computers.

      hey hollywood, until you offer me something that is NOT DRM encumbered I aint' buyin' it! I'll violate your copyright instead...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:terrible idea by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Is there even a media drawer or something to organize and store USB drives in? Do i just toss all my movies into a drawer in a random pile? Is it labeled? It does not appear to be labeled with movie. Would label be readable if stacked nicely in a storage cabinet which may or maynot exist? Doubtful unless stored sideways...taking up a much room as a DVD.

      or

      Some years from now it takes 2 hours to dig thru a stack of USB keys to find the right one.

      A cheap gimmick at the moment that is quite expensive. no thanks

    10. Re:terrible idea by v1 · · Score: 1

      Heh, I'd like to see how "protected" anything that works on OS 8.6 (1999) is

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    11. Re:terrible idea by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Would you rather use an optical drive's power-sucking moving parts

      Having done some QA on usb hardware in the past, I can tell you the USB ports on a box that has things plugged/unplugged a lot will get really loose and not work so well after a while.

      This can be countered with a hub, but it would seem kind of a burden to carry around extra bulk with a laptop when, even without an optical device, you would likely prefer ripping and playing back from the boot device.

    12. Re:terrible idea by superdave80 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought that you were allowed by fair use to make copies for your personal use. You aren't violating copyright, since you purchased a DVD of Ghostbusters. The DMCA is another matter, though...

    13. Re:terrible idea by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      hey hollywood, until you offer me something that is NOT DRM encumbered I aint' buyin' it! I'll violate your copyright instead...

      I'll just do neither. I'll never, ever buy a movie that requires a specific USB drive be installed before I can watch the movie. That's stupid.

      Hey, hollywood! I've seen Ghostbusters. Um, 20 some years ago...

    14. Re:terrible idea by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      I thought that you were allowed by fair use to make copies for your personal use. You aren't violating copyright, since you purchased a DVD of Ghostbusters. The DMCA is another matter, though...

      I won't violate their DRM because it is a pain in the ass to do so. I can think of no movie that is good enough that'd devote 5 minutes to copying - fair use or not...

    15. Re:terrible idea by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      What would you do if your girlfriend came up to you with that preference?

      I'd dongle the living crap out of her.

    16. Re:terrible idea by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Funny

      With a videocam.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    17. Re:terrible idea by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Attach a blinking LED, a little chirpy speaker, and an RFID tag to the thumbdrive. Get an RFID scanner which sends out a signal only to which that tag responds and it starts blinking and beeping to alert you to its location.

      Then you just need a file to associate movie title with RFID tag signal. That could even be built into the scanner.

      (I've proposed similar solutions for managing a home library where maintaining shelf order is not important, passing organizational savings to favor physical book sizes.)

      Then again, you could just keep your content on key rings. If there was a simple MP3 player that would play song files off of any USB memory device, your music library could be kept on your key ring,

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    18. Re:terrible idea by Suzuran · · Score: 5, Funny

      But would you publish it without DRM?

    19. Re:terrible idea by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Troll

      5 minutes? Wow, do you have a crappy computer or what.

      It takes me 6 seconds... I put the disc in the media center I built and walk away, it does it all automatically for me, strips out all that crap on the DVD and gives me the movie without all the garbage. it even titles it by using the DVDDB...

      later I walk by and grab the disc off the tray and put it in my library. Absolutely effortless.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    20. Re:terrible idea by dave420 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if enough people do this, we will ensure that no content provider ever dares to give us free movies in promotions! They'll just stick to selling them, and we can then pay for the movies instead. Yay progress!

      DRM, in this case, is a choice between DRM'd content and no content at all. I'd rather have DRM'd content than none.

    21. Re:terrible idea by FredFredrickson · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Please do fill in the missing steps. I would like to attempt the 6 second rip, but I must be missing something.

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    22. Re:terrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm actually ok with just the free content instead of the Hollywood DRMed stuff. Imagine what Siskel and Ebert, er Roper, would review if there was no Hollywood marketing machine? There's literally millions of indie-ish productions out there. Tens of thousands are good: Red vs. Blue, Idiocracy, etc. to say nothing of the truly off-the-grid stuff. Did you know Doogie Howser aka NPH was in Dr horrible? Of course you did, if you knew about Dr. horrible in the first place.

      So it's not DRM or nothing, its DRM or the DRM free stuff already out there, that the walls Hollywood puts up prevents you from seeing...

    23. Re:terrible idea by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Some years from now it takes 2 hours to dig thru a stack of USB keys to find the right one.

      Some years from now the file is lost due to the electrostatic profile of flash. Some years less than the DVD, I assure you.

      HAL.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    24. Re:terrible idea by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      1 - build a media center.
      2 - install and configure handbrake CLI
      3 - write the script.
      4 - use it.

      I took 2 days writing it and have save at least 12 days of time using it, I'm no shell/perl expert and it was fairly easy. simply go to the websites on how to use the dvddb and handbrake and roll a simple system.. My mediacenter has a linux backend/server so it was easy... under windows it will take considerably more work but can be done.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    25. Re:terrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well apparently it works on Linux as well (As long as it has the right KERNAL)

      Dang, I'm running the Linux kernel, not the KERNAL. Oh well, I didn't want a DRM-encumbered copy of Ghostbusters anyway.

    26. Re:terrible idea by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 3, Funny

      And this is why vacuum tubes are better. You could at least learn to retension tube sockets using a dentist's pick. Then try to apply that to USB ports.

    27. Re:terrible idea by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      >If there was a simple MP3 player that would play song files off of any USB memory device, your music library could be kept on your key ring,

      I have a car radio that has it and a memory card reader as well. Since my MP3 player also uses cards, it's real nice.

    28. Re:terrible idea by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      DMCA, you're not allowed to bypass "technical means" even if it's for fair use.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    29. Re:terrible idea by Firehed · · Score: 1

      Six seconds? I've got an 8-core Mac Pro with 10GB of RAM and it still takes 30-40min to rip a movie with handbrake (at ~500% CPU usage; h.264 1.5Mbit). I imagine it's largely limited by the speed of the optical drive, but whatever.

      Maybe six seconds of user interaction, but that's certainly nowhere near the whole process.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    30. Re:terrible idea by dontmakemethink · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even worse are the "extras" they throw in that get in your way. I want my DVD's to play the movie (and ONLY the movie) on insertion. That means ripping them and discarding the original DVD's. I also want to store DVD's in a binder, so my movie collection isn't a dominant fixture in the room. That means discarding the original cases. Notice how all the materials I paid for end up in the garbage 30 minutes after getting it home?

      And don't get me started on Blu-Ray. Unskippable commercials?!! I would rather copy the movie to VHS!

      After all the junk mail content, packaging, marketing, distribution, etc, the actual profit on a movie sale has got to be only around $3. So instead of stockpiling landfills, why not just let us download and burn it for $5.00? I'd put up with DRM's for that. If Universal can license their music to iTunes, why can't they do online distribution?

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    31. Re:terrible idea by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "no that is a terrible idea, the last thing I want is a ton of USB drives laying around while I try to find any form of media."

      I'll take a "ton" of USB drives over my mound of DVD media any day. No cases to hassle with is a huge plus.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    32. Re:terrible idea by Minwee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You still haven't explained how it can take only six seconds for you to "put the disc in the media center I built" and then "walk by and grab the disc off the tray and put it in my library".

      Unless you also built a stasis booth into your living room there's going to be a little bit more time in between those two events.

    33. Re:terrible idea by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

      What happens after you buy 256 movies, and you run out of USB ports?

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    34. Re:terrible idea by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Well apparently it works on Linux as well (As long as it has the right KERNAL)

      From Argos.co.uk.

      2GB storage.
      Plug and play.
      Compatible with Windows ME, 2008, XP, Mac OS, 8.6 and Higher, Linux, Kernal 2.4X and any operating system with a USB port.

      Bet you anything you like that compatibility guide refers to the USB mass storage functionality and not the data on it.

    35. Re:terrible idea by spazdor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think Lumpy is talking about how much time it takes him. How much unattended work is done by the computer while he's off doing his laundry or whatever is another question.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    36. Re:terrible idea by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Bet you anything you like that compatibility guide refers to the USB mass storage functionality and not the data on it.

      Bet you anything you like that's what i meant when I said

      Although I guess that is wrong for the DRM stuff.

      Admittedly, though, I am having a bad English day :)

      Tom...

    37. Re:terrible idea by Feanturi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which is funny considering that he began his post by making a snarky comment about the other poster's crappy hardware, implying that the whole process really does take only 6 seconds on his uber box of DRM doom.

    38. Re:terrible idea by Lachlan+Hunt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      USB keys are definitely a terrible idea, especially if you're required to have the USB key plugged in to watch the movie. The DRM is going to kill this idea pretty damn quickly; I know I certainly won't be buying. Also, 2GB is barely enough capacity to distribute a film with a reasonable bit-rate and resolution. It's less than DVD and even with h.264 instead of MPEG2, it's not going to be as good.

      I've thought for a while that selling DRM-free movies on 32GB SD cards would be a better solution than Blu-ray, with the ability to transfer the movie onto a hard drive. Imagine walking into a store, plugging in your own reusable SD card into computer kiosk, selecting the movie you want, paying and having it loaded onto your card for you. (This could be done over the internet too, but it may not be practical yet given that not everyone has high speed broadband, overly restrictive usage caps in some countries, and the fact that ISPs are already complaining about having insufficient capacity to deal with the demand.) Then, when you get home, plug your SD card into your media centre, complete with several terabytes of storage and copying it.

      I know there's no way of this happening in the short term thanks to DRM and the relatively high cost of setting up a multi-terrabyte storage system with redundancy (e.g. RAID or something like Drobo) compared with the cost of, say, a blu-ray player. But DRM completely failed for the music industry and it's only a matter of time before it fails for the movie industry too, and the cost of storage is constantly falling.

      --
      By reading this signature, you hereby agree with the content of the above comment.
    39. Re:terrible idea by Zencyde · · Score: 1, Funny

      500% CPU capacity? Wow, I'm only capable of 100%! So that's what all of the hype with OS X is.

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    40. Re:terrible idea by Itninja · · Score: 1

      That means ripping them and discarding the original DVD's. I also want to store DVD's in a binder

      So you want to simultaneously discard and store the original DVDs? I think I see a flaw in your process right there....

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    41. Re:terrible idea by Overzeetop · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really. Bypassing digital rights management is prohibited _except_ as provided for fair use (and a select few other uses). What's prohibited is for anyone else to help you in any way to crack the DRM yourself. So you don't lose your rights to fair use, they just prevent nearly everyone from exercising their rights by making the hurdle to use nearly insurmountable (personally cracking the system and coding the decryption software from scratch). The good thing is that it's not illegal to use someone else measure, just that it is illegal to provide such a measure. That's how Slysoft gets away with it (anydvd and anydvdhd, both of which decrypt content quite well) - they're located in Antigua. They can't sell it to you in the united states, but it is perfectly legal to buy it. Since Antigua and the US have been involved in a monumental pissing match of late, they aren't interested in helping enforce any US laws.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    42. Re:terrible idea by lgw · · Score: 1

      He discards the original DVDs, which do unacceptable things when he puts them in the DVD player. He want to store his correctly-formatted DVD copies in a binder. Thus he keeps neither the original DVD nor its packaging.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    43. Re:terrible idea by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Yes, friends have mentioned memory card-based MP3 players, but memory cards still aren't as ubiquitous as USB thumb drives, and a USB interface could be slapped onto a wide range of storage capacities.

      There are TVs now that you can plug a USB device and play media directly into the TV. Video files, music, and photos. They should go the next step and let people plug in USB DVD, HD DVD, and Blu-Ray drives directly into the television via USB and play them that way.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    44. Re:terrible idea by NumenMaster · · Score: 1

      Agreed. While USB drives are a wonderful way to carry around media, not so as a movie packaging medium. Talk about bulky. If they want to move away from plastic discs, I would suggest SD memory chips where the movie is write protected or hard coded. This way, the packaging is much smaller and easier to store in a binder. But, I'm kind of groovy on keeping the DVD format.

      --
      Where's my sock? There it is...
    45. Re:terrible idea by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 4, Funny

      Duh! 500% _of_a_CPU_ on an 8-CPU machine...

    46. Re:terrible idea by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      He only said he had a copy of Ghostbusters, not that he had purchased it. It could have been borrowed from a friend, rented, or checked out from the library.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    47. Re:terrible idea by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's called doing other things. Unlike really wierd people that sit there and fret and wring my hands while the PC does something, I do other things.

      Therefore time SPENT by me to rip = 6 seconds.

      You did not seriously think that people sit there and wait for a rip to finish do you?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    48. Re:terrible idea by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Unskippable commercials?!!

      Not unique to Blu-Ray, just a lot rarer in DVD. That, and ever since CSS was cracked, you could always choose a DVD player (VLC, anyone?) which makes them skippable again.

      why not just let us download and burn it for $5.00? I'd put up with DRM's for that.

      I'd pay the $5, but I wouldn't put up with DRM.

      For that matter, iTunes offers DRM-free music, but I don't buy any of it, mostly because even for these songs, you have to purchase and download them through iTunes. Since iTunes will never have a Linux version, I end up buying music from people who let me buy downloadable things the old-fashioned way -- through a web browser.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    49. Re:terrible idea by Minwee · · Score: 3, Funny

      You did not seriously think that people sit there and wait for a rip to finish do you?

      No, I think that people have other things to do. Like actually leave the house, use the computer for other things besides encoding media, or even (gasp!) turning the thing off.

      And all of those take place in real time that isn't measured in imaginary numbers.

      Therefore time SPENT by me to rip = 6 seconds.

      Uh huh. And time SPENT by me to receive a PhD in nuclear physics is really less than a minute, since all I have to do was accept a piece of paper and shake some old guy's hand, right?

    50. Re:terrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called doing other things. Unlike really wierd people that sit there and fret and wring my hands while the PC does something, I do other things.
      Therefore time SPENT by me to rip = 6 seconds.
      You did not seriously think that people sit there and wait for a rip to finish do you?

      No one gives a shit. Seriously.

      Unless you're giving out the specs on your L337-optimal DVD ripping system, your comment is completely useless.

    51. Re:terrible idea by PsychoElf · · Score: 1

      Oh....um guess I should go then...

    52. Re:terrible idea by PsychoElf · · Score: 1

      so its actually 4000%?

    53. Re:terrible idea by BlueCollarCamel · · Score: 1

      Except now I have to set aside my time to do such a project.

      --
      1&1 - Cheap domain and web hosting.
    54. Re:terrible idea by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      My usb drive filled with movies works on any platform.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    55. Re:terrible idea by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Wait, you had a perl script complete your PhD in nuclear physics while you went and did something else? I'm impressed.

    56. Re:terrible idea by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      with that logic, I could rip in 6 seconds on a 486dx/40.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    57. Re:terrible idea by DrXym · · Score: 2, Interesting
      hey hollywood, until you offer me something that is NOT DRM encumbered I aint' buyin' it! I'll violate your copyright instead...

      The problem is that Hollywood isn't going to listen to you. They think that movie files can be DRM'd the same way as physical disks can and so they demand it.

      The problem is they are pissing in their own pool. The digital download scene is a wasteland of proprietary DRM schemes, proprietary players, proprietary devices attached to proprietary services. The result is consumers are scared, confused and angry. You might need one device / player for one movie bought from one place and another device / player for another. You might even discover that your movie cannot be transferred or doesn't even work because the service was cancelled. It's happened with PlaysForSure and might happen to Amazon Unbox too some day. Only an idiot would try and build up a collection of titles amongst this chaos.

      Look at what proprietary did to the music scene. Even Apple has begun to backdown from it and offer unencumbered downloads instead.

      The industry really needs to adopt a single common file format, preferably with passive watermarking and no restrictions on usage. The result would be a massive upsurge in spending. Consumers would be confident in the format because they can purchase and manage their collection from anywhere. Consumers also get a better deal because stores are forced to compete on price and service. Any losses due to piracy would be dwarfed by legitimate sales. If they must implement a DRM, it should be one which is managed by an independent entity, allows fair use, and protects the consumer if a store dies or cancels its service.

    58. Re:terrible idea by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      you will want to rip with settings that give you about 3.2gig because the film was created on very low grade film it cant be compressed hard without artifacts

      So shooting on low quality film is a form of DRM?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    59. Re:terrible idea by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      Which is funny considering that he began his post by making a snarky comment about the other poster's crappy hardware, implying that the whole process really does take only 6 seconds on his uber box of DRM doom.

      True hackers don't have fast computers, they have a stasis generator in their chairs.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    60. Re:terrible idea by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I would have just shut up and not tried to make myself sound wickedly cool for knowing how to script.

      When we talk about ripping, we talk about the whole process from start to finish.
      It doesn't matter if you're doing something else or not, the end result is always how long it takes to finish so other things can be done of the same type.

      Yes, people do kinda wait for a rip to finish when that's only a small portion of what needs to be done. If typing "./rip.sh" and going out to your Honda Civic to hear the monza exhaust for 30-40 minutes is your thing so be it. The end result is still the same as everyone else... just with other extracurricular activities involved that don't matter in the equation.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    61. Re:terrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did not know that to get a phd you do not have to listen to lectures, do homework, labs, take tests...

      All you have to do to get a PHD is walk the aisle and get the diploma? How do you make a computer do all the other work for you?

      Oh wait, your example is a EPIC FAIL... nice.

      Lumpy Owned you hard, you just cant admit it :)

    62. Re:terrible idea by Old+Grey+Beard · · Score: 1

      You might even discover that your movie cannot be transferred or doesn't even work because the service was cancelled. It's happened with PlaysForSure and might happen to Amazon Unbox too some day.

      And don't forget DIVX (Digital Video Express) format, not to be confused with the popular DivX codec. Introduced late 1998, discontinued mid-2001 leaving movie owners high and dry.

      --
      "The urge to save humanity is almost always a false front for the urge to rule it."
      - H. L. Mencken
    63. Re:terrible idea by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      If there was a simple MP3 player that would play song files off of any USB memory device, your music library could be kept on your key ring

      They DID make one. I'm trying to remember what it was called. It kind of sucked, since the USB port wasn't on the player itself, there was a tether with some kind of micro-connector on one end that I've never seen anywhere else. Ran on one AAA battery and had an integrated FM radio.

      I can't remember the make/model (it's in the drawer of my desk at home). I'll self-respond tonight.

    64. Re:terrible idea by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      1. Buy DVD Binder (or 5)
      2. foreach $dvd(@dvds) { mv CASE/$dvd BINDER/ }
      3. mv SHELF/CASE /CLOSET/BOX OR rm CASE

      Seems like a lot of work, but it's surprisingly relaxing. (Between games, movies, and Anime, I've done this with over 1000 discs. Far easier to manage 6 binders than all those cases)

    65. Re:terrible idea by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      I have a lexar jumpdrive mp3 player. It uses an oddly small thumbdrive and other thumbdrives may not fit in the player.

      The user interface sucks but it runs for 10 hours on a rechargable AAA bat. It's also cheap enough that I don't care if it gets lost or broken.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    66. Re:terrible idea by /cypher · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bypassing digital rights management is prohibited _except_ as provided for fair use (and a select few other uses).

      If only that were true. Although the text of the DMCA mentions fair use, it doesn't really offer any protection for people who violate "technological protection" of the media in order to exercise those rights. Just look at http://chillingeffects.org/ for examples. The only real protection for people who have legitimate needs to get around DRM come in the form of exemptions which are reexamined and granted every 3 years. Here is the latest set of DMCA exemptions. The EFF specifically notes that no provisions have been made for the sort of fair use rights relevant to this discussion:

      ...all the proposed exemptions that would benefit consumers were denied (space-shifting, region coding, backing up DVDs).

      --
      :-| have a day
    67. Re:terrible idea by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      But I rather like my cases and being able to display my DVD collection on the walls surrounding my TV (34 feet of Atlantic Penguin and Elf racks), especially those in special packaging, and those series box sets.

      Though having to move them all recently into 72"x72"x30" storage prior to renovation work has made me reconsider how I'll store them after the work is done.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    68. Re:terrible idea by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      At least they didn't say Win95. I bought a flash drive that said it worked with Win95... well, it would, if you found a driver for it, which doesn't exist. And yeah, I looked. It didn't exist.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    69. Re:terrible idea by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      The Wall'o'DVDs approach has it's advantages, agreed, but the poster I was responding too explicitly referred to the hassle of dealing with cases

    70. Re:terrible idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That can be easily fixed.

      Get a 4 gig usb key instead, a DVD of ghostbusters and a copy of handbrake. (you will want to rip with settings that give you about 3.2gig because the film was created on very low grade film it cant be compressed hard without artifacts.)

      rip the dvd to a OPEN unencumbered codec. place on USB key.

      Voila. same thing in BETTER quality without the DRM and is compatible with most computers.

      hey hollywood, until you offer me something that is NOT DRM encumbered I aint' buyin' it! I'll violate your copyright instead...

      Or, you could just drop the DVD of Ghostbusters you bought in step 2 in your PC's DVD drive and watch it, dumbass. What kind of copyright warrior BUYS the dvd to rip? Fucking poser.

    71. Re:terrible idea by DrXym · · Score: 1
      DIVX was a rental model. I really don't care if they slather rental formats with DRM since in a few days you have to return the disk or rerent the movie anyway.

      It's different for movies you want to keep for years and years. I have no problem with DVD or Blu Ray because you can keep 'em in a cupboard, sell them, loan them, play them on any player from dozens of manufacturers. You can even rip and transcode them if you have the knowhow.

      What I object to is profusion of proprietary players and formats for digital download. You can't rent or loan that title, you don't get any features, the title is locked to specific devices/players, registration is required to transfer it and it is far too easy for the provider to pull the plug and lose everything. Oh and they cost nearly the same and often times more than physical disks which have none of those issues and have better quality & features. Its in the studio's interests to make downloads open and standards compliant. Otherwise it will just be Microsoft, Apple, Amazon beating each other to an impasse for years to come while consumers stare on in bemusement.

    72. Re:terrible idea by Geminii · · Score: 1

      There's a joke in here somewhere about the analog hole...

  2. countdown by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Waiting to hear news that the movie's been unlocked in 3... 2... 1...

    1. Re:countdown by scourfish · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're late to the scene, they had it cracked at 4

    2. Re:countdown by johndmartiniii · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder if you took an image of the USB key and mounted the image as a filesystem. Maybe that might work.

      Or... oh wait, Ghostbusters?

      --
      If you don't know what you're doing, you can't make mistakes.
    3. Re:countdown by WK2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Agreed. There is no chance this DRM will work. My question is what are they afraid of? Ghostbusters has been on the pirate bay since at least 2005. I'm sure it was on Limewire and Kazaa before that. If they are testing to see if this DRM will work, they already know the answer. It works OK for the non-technical folk, and has no chance in hell for the people who would actually want to buy a movie on USB stick (if it didn't have DRM, at least). This just seems like one of the most useless ideas Hollywood has had.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    4. Re:countdown by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Funny

      This just seems like one of the most useless ideas Hollywood has had.

      Hollywood made "Battlefield: Earth." This isn't even in the top ten, sorry buddy.

    5. Re:countdown by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They're more interested in proving the principle of the thing than protecting this particular film. If it gets ripped, Hollywood isn't going to be as upset as they would be if, say, Quantum of Solace were ripped. If it doesn't get ripped, well, distributing Return of the Revenge of Batman in 2012 on a 32Gb SD card isn't going to seem so crazy.

      The idea of tying digital copies to a particular storage device isn't new, and several parties have been trying to persuade Hollywood that this idea works for a while. HD DVD supported something called CPRM, where each writable disk could have embedded upon it, in an unwritable part of the disk, a key that copies could be tied to. The idea was that you'd (or a kiosk would) be able to download and burn to a disk an official, authorized, copy of a movie, that would be just as uncopyable as a regular AACS-controlled disk. This was an extension of attempts by the DVD Forum to make CPRM work with regular DVDs for some years, which looks set to be a part of the next revision of the DVD standard. You can imagine how attractive this is to studios who do not want to put hundreds of thousands of copies of low-interest content in stores around the world.

      Likewise, the "SD" in "SD card" is about a similar system, and initially that was the major difference between SD cards and MMC cards, though the two standards have grown apart since in other ways.

      Whether this is good or bad depends on your point of view to a certain extent, but what is clear is that Hollywood isn't planning on abandoning DRM any time soon. As a result, they're not going to adopt any form of writable media to store digital copies unless it has some kind of DRM system built-in. This is a step towards that goal.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:countdown by WK2 · · Score: 1

      They're more interested in proving the principle of the thing than protecting this particular film. If it gets ripped, Hollywood isn't going to be as upset as they would be if, say, Quantum of Solace were ripped.

      Yes, I mentioned that as a possibility above, but I also said that Hollywood already knows the answer.

      If it doesn't get ripped...

      And that isn't the answer.

      --
      Write your own Choose Your Own Adventure. http://www.freegameengines.org/gamebook-engine/
    7. Re:countdown by Scarletdown · · Score: 4, Funny

      Waiting to hear news that the movie's been unlocked in 3... 2... 1...

      Good news for you...

      Used copy of Ghost Busters: $5 - $10 or so
      2GB Flash Drive: $15 - $20
      DVD Shrink to strip out everything but the movie, compress enough to fit in 2GB, and save as an ISO image: Free
      VLC Media Player to play said ISO on Linux, BSD, Solaris, OS-X, BeOS, Windows, QNX (WTF is this?), or Syllable (WTF is this one as well?): Free

      Purchasing an overpriced, DRMed version of a movie (that will most likely be playable only on a Windows box) just because it's sold on a Flash Drive?: Pointless

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    8. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please ignore. This is a test.

      Would you rather use an optical drive's power-sucking moving parts, especially while using a laptop? Sometimes we don't have der internets to get us

    9. Re:countdown by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Heck, my parents had a VHS copy of the movie back in like 1990!

    10. Re:countdown by DJ+Jones · · Score: 4, Informative

      USB Dongles have been cracked for years. Once you crack the key (a 2 minute process), you can dump the data off it and then emulate the dongle at will. See for yourself

      This hasn't stopped my company from using them for licensing... Despite me demonstrating this.

    11. Re:countdown by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      Heck, my parents had a VHS copy of the movie back in like 1990!

      Bah. That's nothing, youngster. We had it on CED back in the 80s. And even now, I still have a commercial copy on Beta.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    12. Re:countdown by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      This is old technology. If I recall correctly, Avid Technology has been using it for years to prevent people from pirating their overpriced software.

      P.S. Does anybody know where I can get a pirated copy of Avid? It's really cool!

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    13. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Having just come out of a meeting that was mostly dominated by the discussion of several outright ludicrous, impractical, and benefit-free ideas, I have a very vivid appreciation for just how good an obviously stupid idea can seem (to certain types of people).

      Some people just can't think things through. They can't visualize realities of use. They can't form a mental picture from a verbal description. They can't get their heads around *anything* until you have it completed and show it to them.

      And many such people manage to work themselves into decision-making positions (their incentive to do this is higher, I suppose, since they can't actually build anything themselves).

      So, no, Hollywood will not learn. At least, not any time soon. They are going to have to pour a lot more money into DRM, and see it outright fail many, many more times, before they get the idea that it just won't work.

    14. Re:countdown by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      OK, so NO ONE crack it or rip it until it becomes standard.
      Shhh, keep this on the down low.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:countdown by maxume · · Score: 1
      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    16. Re:countdown by bhtooefr · · Score: 2, Informative

      QNX is a *nix for embedded applications, with a realtime microkernel, and Syllable is a fork of AtheOS, which was originally intended to be a modern Amiga-like OS.

    17. Re:countdown by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      "This just seems like one of the most useless ideas Hollywood has had."

      Hollywood made "Battlefield: Earth." This isn't even in the top ten, sorry buddy.

      Hmmm, so, we've got "Battlefield: Earth" and "Uwe Boll" ... I'm thinking fleshing out the rest of the top ten can't be that tough.

      From the looks of box-office figures, I'm going to suggest "Star Wars: Clone Wars" is right up there. ;-)

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    18. Re:countdown by hey! · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, I'm guessing they're just wanting to see what people will do. For that purpose, an already widely "pirated" film would be ideal.

      The model of distributing the film on a USB key that serves as a DRM dongle is very curious. From a consumer point of view, this looks a lot like the way DVDs are supposed to work: the material is tied to the delivery vehicle. But -- you can also copy the movie to your hard disk, although it is still tied to the key. So, it's kind of an answer to iTunes, where you have a master key to your entire collection.

      The USB format allows you to do kinds of cryptographic protections you couldn't do in a DVD. If the system requires Vista style DRM protections in the OS, then cracking the protection would be considerably harder as long as you can't just copy the file onto a hard disk. Allowing the user to copy the file to disk makes this a very interesting test. Clearly, this means that crackers will be able to put the entire DRM protocol under a microscope.

      Maybe this is even what is intended.

      There are a number of possible outcomes, all of which are interesting to a company that is evaluating a technology:

      (1) The play from USB option is proven insecure.

      (2) The play from disk option is proven insecure.

      (3) One of [1,2], but not both.

      (4) Both of [1,2], but sufficiently inconvenient to deter casual infringers.

      etc.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    19. Re:countdown by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      2 GB flash drives are $5-$10 these days:

      Ah. I was just going by what is available locally.

      And curse you for showing me that. Now you have planted in my head the notion to get a higher capacity flash drive even though my 1GB drive is more than sufficient for my current needs.

      Must...resist...

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    20. Re:countdown by Kingrames · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great. Just great. This is bad. real bad. Dogs and cats living together, Mass hysteria bad.

      --
      If you can read this, I forgot to post anonymously.
    21. Re:countdown by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      Hey, that was just like those Master Card commercials. Pretty clever!

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    22. Re:countdown by maxume · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm going through the same thing, only my current drive is 2 GB. Of course, it get's worse:

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16820609296

      I am currently telling myself that if 8 GB is available in that form factor now (apparently is uses a slower, denser type of flash), 32 GB will be available in that form factor real-soon-now, so I might as well wait until then to upgrade (plus, 8 GB will be $5 by then).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    23. Re:countdown by skeldoy · · Score: 0

      dd if=/dev/usbThingy of=theMovie.movieFormatExtension && file movieFormatExtension
      done! - before you could count to three. ;)

    24. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the one movie they could put on a USB key without worrying the DRM would be cracked.

      The CAPTCHA for this post was infringe. Nice. :D

    25. Re:countdown by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uwe Boll's movies are filmed in Canada and funded primarily by European investors. The Clone Wars was self-funded and created in-house by Lucasfilm, which is not Hollywood-based. Not all movies are made by Hollywood.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
    26. Re:countdown by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I actually didn't originally intend it to come across that way, at least not until I started wrapping up the post with the final line there.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    27. Re:countdown by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      QNX is a popular microkernel real time OS, an excellent option for a mission critical embedded device OS.

        Of course people have been writing web browsers and other such desktop apps just because. You can try it free, runs from a floppy if you are so inclined. It makes sense VLC supports QNX, it's probably used as part of some A/V device.

        Syllable, like Haiku is one of those OS necromancy projects.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    28. Re:countdown by FredFredrickson · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's the most brilliant DRM scheme to date.

      Step 1. Lock down media tight with cumbersome steps that are obnoxious to all.
      Step 2. Don't make a product anybody wants in the first place.

      It's brilliant. I bet piracy goes down 5000% with this new scheme. I wish I had thought of this. Let's also release 3 hour clips of a jar of mayonaise, locked down with DRM. I betcha nobody will crack it.

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    29. Re:countdown by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Uwe Boll's movies are filmed in Canada and funded primarily by European investors. The Clone Wars was self-funded and created in-house by Lucasfilm, which is not Hollywood-based. Not all movies are made by Hollywood.

      All very true, but I've never been clear on the demarcation. Once one of the major companies based out of Hollywood is involved at some level in the distribution and production, in my mind it becomes Hollywood.

      Probably all very incorrect. I realize it's not necessarily made "in" Hollywood, but I tend to think of it as being made by or for Hollywood.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    30. Re:countdown by Kjella · · Score: 1

      They're more interested in proving the principle of the thing than protecting this particular film. If it gets ripped, Hollywood isn't going to be as upset as they would be if, say, Quantum of Solace were ripped. If it doesn't get ripped, well, distributing Return of the Revenge of Batman in 2012 on a 32Gb SD card isn't going to seem so crazy.

      What principle is that? That with enough abudantly available and superior copies noone's going to bother cracking the grainy thumbnail? In practise they can't stop selling DVDs or Blu-Rays for decades so thepiratebay is well fed. The music industry finally started to see the light with CDs when they realized they were only pissing off customers trying to put it on their iPod, pirates be damned. Any DRM they come up with now will mean nothing to TPB and probably be annoying to the customers. It's really too bad, because torrents aren't exactly instant gratification. If I could go to an online store, pick "buy this" and have it start playing then leave itself in a nice normal file I could just play like a disc rip, I'd buy that.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    31. Re:countdown by FredFredrickson · · Score: 2, Funny

      Guys, don't fall into this trap. I've been doing this since around 128 mb. I still have yet to actually purchase any hardware.

      I mean, seriously? The next best is around the corner anyway...

      --
      Belief? Hope? Preference?The Existential Vortex
    32. Re:countdown by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      As a result, they're not going to adopt any form of writable media to store digital copies unless it has some kind of DRM system built-in. This is a step towards that goal.

      VHS? DVD? Isn't readable media more the problem, since you can copy to another media? Writable media just means you can destroy it.

    33. Re:countdown by arth1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even without DRM, this is doomed to fail.
      Why would one buy a movie in less than 2 GB quality on a device that costs dollars to produce instead of an 8.5 GB version on a storage device that costs pennies to produce?
      And the latter being playable on computers and consumer devices, while the former needing not only a computer, but a certain operating system and special software?

      Surely, the producers must know that this is doomed to fail, and only use it as another example to show the ignorant politicians that "See, we gave them more options, but they STILL pirate! Legislate, legislate!"

    34. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question is what are they afraid of?

      They ain't afraid of no ghosts, that's for sure!

    35. Re:countdown by jadin · · Score: 1

      They don't care because it's the "sweded" version of the movie.

    36. Re:countdown by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      Isn't readable media more the problem, since you can copy to another media? Writable media just means you can destroy it.

      That's the purpose of the new WORN (Write Once, Read ? No.) standard. An elegant solution to the problem.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    37. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless there's something in the hardware of the usb key that is outside of the filesystem.

    38. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *whooosh*

    39. Re:countdown by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Hollywood supported VHS when it was the only game in town, but it wasn't digital so it's kind of beside the point.

      Right now, the movie industry does not support writable DVDs. You can't go to a website, buy the movie you want, download it, and burn it to a DVD readable in a "real" DVD player. You could (technically - obviously no movie studio actually offered the service, no burners existed, and no suitable blank media existed, but nominally there was nothing stopping any of these things from existing. At the very least, all players supported playing the discs) do that with HD DVD, because HD DVD supported CPRM right off the bat. DVD2.0 will also include the technology, so you'll be able to buy blank DVD-Rs with serial numbers embedded in them, buy a movie over the Internet, download a copy that's tied to a DVD-R with that serial number, burn it, and play it on any player that supports DVD2.0 (or "Download/DL" as this feature will be branded. A DVD player that's branded "Download/DL" is just one that supports CPRM.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    40. Re:countdown by Vanders · · Score: 1

      VLC Media Player to play said ISO on Linux, BSD, Solaris, OS-X, BeOS, Windows, QNX (WTF is this?), or Syllable (WTF is this one as well?): Free

      QNX is a widely used embedded system that happens to also have a very nice desktop/development environment, so it can also run VLC. Syllable is a fork of the now long-dead AtheOS, and is mostly GPL/LGPL so you can give it a try if you like. We even have a pre-installed virtual machine image (VMDK) you can try, if you like.

    41. Re:countdown by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I think any of the crap Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer churn out would have a good shot at number one on that list.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    42. Re:countdown by againjj · · Score: 1

      Purchasing an overpriced, DRMed version of a movie (that will most likely be playable only on a Windows box)

      Just to be pedantic:

      Compatible with Windows ME, 2008, XP, Mac OS, 8.6 and Higher, Linux, Kernal 2.4X and any operating system with a USB port.

    43. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is this true?

    44. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes it's true. This man has no dick.

    45. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Argos can't even get the specs on a vacuum cleaner correct, so I wouldn't trust anything they have to say about anything even remotely technical. The USB key probably works on all of those systems as a USB key but I doubt the movie is playable on them all.

    46. Re:countdown by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Lies. We have tons of DVD creation software for this purpose. Modern DVD players play burned DVDs, I recall earlier ones only playing DVD-R which worked like a real DVD physically (DVD+R uses a more technically stable wobble encoding, but it's not compatible). Hell, we have DVD players that can record to DVD+RW now.

    47. Re:countdown by kimvette · · Score: 1

      New copy of Ghostbusters from Sprawl-Mart, on DVD: $5.00.

      DVD::Rip: Free.

      ffmpeg to transcode for viewing on your PDA, ipod, or phone: Free.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    48. Re:countdown by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      What would be the point?

      I'm sure this technology will be cracked before it gets out the door (the fact that it plays on Linux means I can probably already dump the stream from my player) but seriously, why bother with a movie that's already been ripped 100 times?

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
    49. Re:countdown by siphonophore · · Score: 1

      Shame on the modders for missing this classic GB reference!

      --
      Dance like you're hurt, Love like you need money, and work when somebody's watching.
      -Scott Adams
    50. Re:countdown by mrslacker · · Score: 1

      Better news:

      Play on hulu.com for free, or on NetFlix with your $10/month subscription and either Windows or your Roku box.

      Yes, those are US only options, and Argos is the UK.

    51. Re:countdown by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 1

      Hollywood sued Sony for the Betamax.

      Hollywood only accepted video cassettes once they became a roaring success. What kind of enterprising pioneers took the plunge and put their movies on video cassettes when that was risky and untried?

       

    52. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like DRM, but i think this is a good idea. USB keys can't get scratched like DVDs. That is why I rip DVDs into Xvid files to a share on my computer and watch them with XBMC at the tv. No, it won't do anything about piracy with or without DRM. But i would love to purchase a movie that is not going to get scratched and unusable.

      However, I also loved Battlefield: Earth!

    53. Re:countdown by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Well sure. If you crack it, all the mayonnaise would leak out.

    54. Re:countdown by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Even if it is cracked and ripped, they may never find out. Since it is such a crappy version of the movie, it would seem a version ripped and compressed from the DVD would be better, even at the same file size, so any copy from this thing is unlikely to ever be shared enough to turn up on their radar.

    55. Re:countdown by Dieppe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why do I imagine a horde of Dalek lawyers? "Legislate! Legislate!"

    56. Re:countdown by ardle · · Score: 1

      I think it was the pronography industry.

    57. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My question is what are they afraid of?

      I ain't 'fraid of no ghost!

    58. Re:countdown by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Lies?

      So, which Hollywood studio is offering you a process for downloading content for burning to DVD? And what store sells CPRM-coded DVD-Rs? And what DVD players play DVD-Rs with CPRM-controlled content?

      If I was lying, you could probably quote some studios, software, stores (and branded media), and DVD models, rather than throw around vague generalities that suggest you don't know the difference between CPRM-controlled media and ordinary DVD-Rs.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    59. Re:countdown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell him about the Twinkie...

    60. Re:countdown by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I once had a USB flash drive (actually a pocket SD card reader, but meh) that said it would work on Win95. Did it? Well, I suppose it might have, if I had found drivers, which didn't exist. No-name crap manufacturer who used whatever chip he could get cheapest and rolled his own firmware, apparently. It works fine in XP, Ubuntu, and Mac, but no, it doesn't work in Win95.

      What is the point of that story? Well, people have been known to claim their USB device is supported on practically every known operating system just because USB is supported. Their software/drivers might not be, though.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    61. Re:countdown by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      This has what relevance? Your entire argument hinges on the implication that the studios don't want illegitimate DVDs made; but they fully support a writable format (DVD) that people can (gasp) write to to play in approved, certified software and hardware players. They simply don't supply the content; The Pirate Bay does that.

    62. Re:countdown by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Your entire argument hinges on the implication that the studios don't want illegitimate DVDs made;

      No, it doesn't. That wasn't my argument at all, or in any way resembled my argument. I'd try to explain it again, but to be honest, everyone else replying to my comment seems to have "got it", so I doubt a rehash would be any more comprehendable to you. What I do suggest is that you look up CPRM, and determine what application it is for, and then relate it to my original post and the Ghostbusters-on-a-USB-stick thing that this article is about.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    63. Re:countdown by Geminii · · Score: 1
      We don't like these guys, right? So encouraging them to repeatedly waste all their money on inherently unworkable schemes will ultimately work in our favor... hmm.

      "Ray, when the MPAA asks you if DRM works, you say YES!"

  3. No thanks, I like to own media and do what I want by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can't rip it, can't archive it, can't move it to my HDD without the dongle. And if the flash drive gets damaged, who you gonna call?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  4. Betamax vs. VHS by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

    O.K., so the Blue Ray just won the Hi Def Wars. So now we get into another format war? Sigh.

    1. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now we get into another format war?

      I highly doubt it.

      Blu-Ray has a storage capacity of 25GB single sided and 50GB double-layer. The closed USB drive available to "compete" with that is probably something like this which as you can see would not be cost effective at all.

    2. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by Abreu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Blue Ray won't "win" the format wars until they sell more than standard def DVDs

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    3. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by The+Moof · · Score: 1

      Sneakernet's been around forever.

    4. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope. Blu-ray hasn't won anything. HD DVD lost.

      Blu-ray has yet to get any traction, and in all honesty, with only higher quality video and marginally better audio to have over DVD, I seriously doubt it ever will. It's going to remain a niche videophile technology for the foreseeable future, until HD downloads become commonplace and available under reasonable pricing terms.

      It might survive as a data storage technology though. The multilayer BD disk thing may not be suitable for pressed media, but it should work pretty well as a rewritable storage thing. 200Gb removable disks. Yum.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    5. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. Blue Ray may have beat out HD-DVD, but they could still be eclipsed by some other standard just over the horizon. I doubt it will be USB-keys though.

    6. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by zippthorne · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I dunno. USB keys have a far superior form factor, and the installed players need only have a USB port and whatever processing is needed to actually view the movie.

      You could have media players smaller than a Nintendo Wii, far better future compatibility (both the players and the disks are likely to be backwards compatible in a way that either could work with the other for quite some time)

      The media is far less susceptible to scratching, impact, and even heat and chemicals: I've put USB sticks through the washer AND drier and what came out has worked perfectly for over five years.

      It's also more portable. You can grab a handful of films and stick 'em in your back pocket before visiting friends (so they're also likely to be lost easily.. a big win for Hollywood!)

      The only drawbacks are capacity at the moment (it's not anywhere near as cheap as optical disk. Although I wonder how expensive 30GB mask roms would be for a print run the size of a typical hollywood film (if anyone was making mask rom of anywhere near that size, that is)) and DRM: a usb stick can have active crypto circuitry, which really changes the game quite significantly.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Blu-ray has yet to get any traction, and in all honesty, with only higher quality video and marginally better audio to have over DVD, I seriously doubt it ever will. It's going to remain a niche videophile technology for the foreseeable future

      Then again, there is the whole "transition to digital TV" thing, and high-quality picture on digital cable and satellite has inspired many people to go out and buy brand-new, high resolution TVs. The DVD format does nothing for these sets. Anybody who wants to see his home video collection match the picture quality of television is a candidate for a Blu-ray player. Consider, especially, the fact that DVDs of modern TV series are selling really well. Now imagine if the show actually looked better on TV before you bought the DVD. That, combined with the rapidly dropping price of Blu-Ray hardware, makes me not want to discount the format too quickly.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    8. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by Mascot · · Score: 1

      Among me and my friends, HD capable media jukeboxes won the HD war.

    9. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Then again, there is the whole "transition to digital TV" thing, and high-quality picture on digital cable and satellite has inspired many people to go out and buy brand-new, high resolution TVs. The DVD format does nothing for these sets.

      No, but the sets do something for DVD. I personally very nearly didn't bother trying an HD player because DVD looked so damned good on my new LCD TV it seemed close to impossible to see how HD DVD (or Blu-ray) could be any better. And it is better, usually, but not so much that we dislike watching DVDs. In fact, my wife has told me she can't tell the difference, and a friend of mine who bought a much flashier, larger, TV than I did has told me he sees no difference at all.

      In any case, don't over-estimate the impact of digital TVs. TVs capable of showing a difference between ED and HD in a picture from the other side of a small room start at around $500-600, with, realistically, $1,000-2,000 being necessary. In the meantime, 90% of people I've seen with large TVs watch SD channels in stretch-o-vision. With the economy tanking as it is, I find the probability people are going to run out to buy TVs so big that even 480p24 (that is, reverse-pulldowned) DVD looks anything other than great supremely unlikely.

      By the time we see a large up-take of large HD screens, I expect digital downloads to be in full force.

      Now imagine if the show actually looked better on TV before you bought the DVD

      You'd be surprised. VHS lasted for two decades, and people used it to manually collect TV serieses, or often as their primary way to watch TV.

      And don't discount the disadvantages of the format. That Blu-ray disc set may look great on the living room TV, but it's not going to play anywhere else until you're willing to buy Blu-ray players for every TV in the house. With most households becoming multi-TV, and with portable DVD players becoming increasingly commons, both standalone and installable in SUVs etc, a DVD is pretty damned useful, and replacing that infrastructure even if portable Blu-ray players appear within the next couple of years, and even if Blu-ray players fall below $200, is pretty damned expensive.

      If you're a parent, and you want to buy a Disney movie to keep the kids quiet, are you going to pay over-the-odds for the Blu-ray version and give up your living room everytime your kids want to watch it, or are you going to stick with the DVD version? Are your kids even going to care about the high definition?

      Blu-ray is a less useful format that offers improved image quality and marginally better audio quality, but even in those cases requires infrastructure capable of showing the difference, and eyeballs and ears that enjoy the difference. Personally, I'm of the opinion that HD DVD at least had a shot, on the grounds that it was an improvement even for SD users (managed copy, downloadable content, download-and-burn, etc), but BD doesn't even have that. It's not a more useful format than DVD. Which is why DVD will continue to live for many years, and why Blu-ray is unlikely to ever gain any traction.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    10. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by sootman · · Score: 1

      No, no, no! "The only drawback", as you put it, is that they exist at all. We should be moving AWAY from physical media. I don't want to shuffle tapes, I don't want to shuffle discs, and I sure as hell don't want a bagful of USB keys with movies. (Seriously, this is retarded--how do you organize a few hundred USB keys?) Movies and music are DATA. Data lives on a SERVER and gets read or copied as needed. I've got tons of movies and shows (and songs, of course) stored on my server and I watch them with the Mac mini that's hooked up to my TV, occasionally on my computer or laptop in the bedroom, and on my iPod or laptop when traveling. I rip my movies so they come in at about 1 GB apiece so when I travel with my laptop I can easily have fifty or a hundred with me. Who the hell wants to carry around a hundred USB keys? If you're content to have DRM, you may as well buy movies from the iTunes store.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    11. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Superior form factor? OK, tiny is not necessarily a good thing. Think of having a collection of say 150 movies on various, proprietarily DRM'd USB keys. They dont't stack well, have limited space for labeling (tiny text), are easily lost under couches, fall out of pockets, get lost in your luggage, are are susceptible to heat, foul weater, static discharge, and water.

      I can't think of much worse of a medium to put a movie on. I could imagine fumbling whole key chains of fobs looking for a movie, breaking the little rings off trying to disconnect one, loosing the caps everywhere (and having dogs, cats, and kids yarking all over after eating a cap), and more.

      Since you can't watch the movie without the exact right key in a USB port, even copying them to a hard drive has no real benefit. Even if you could put 3-8 movies on a single thumb drive (assuming you can afford a 16GB stick) you're still talking about juggling dozens of these things. ...and they're a LOT more expensive to make than a blue-ray disk.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    12. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Blu-ray has yet to get any traction, and in all honesty, with only higher quality video and marginally better audio to have over DVD, I seriously doubt it ever will. It's going to remain a niche videophile technology for the foreseeable future, until HD downloads become commonplace and available under reasonable pricing terms.

      My first home DVD player was the Sony S360 (or was it 360S) -- Really nice user interface, FULL controls on the front, it was WONDERFUL. Oops, nope, wait - at over $330 at the time one would expect it to last longer than sub-$200 players. No such luck. The thing died - they had a bad run with defective laser assemblies and I replaced it with the Apex AD-600A. A player that cost only $179 but was Macrovision and Region free, offered vastly superior features and fewer compression artifacts. Granted, the user interface sucked on the Apex (the remote was a clumsy disorganized grid of buttons, only a couple of front panel controls - hey, just like ALL of today's DVD players. Apex was ahead of the curve on that one!) but it was a far better value, and it still works to this day. I should have bought the Apex in the first place, but silly me, I thought the Sony would be a better-quality player than the no-name built-in-a-tent Apex.

      Soooo, I won't pay over $100 for a Blu-Ray player. I'm not getting suckered into paying a premium for a player which is built to crappy tolerances where the company will not admit to a bad run. My current player is a $60 Philips player (I don't use the Apex any more because I wanted a player with Xvid support) and it suits me fine. I'll be upgrading to an upscaling player soon, and wait until Blu-Ray players come to reasonable prices. I'm looking forward to seeing how good the integrated upscalers are in the Samsung television though. If the upscaler is good enough, why will I need Blu-Ray at all? Most of the shows I like were not recorded in high def, and the ones that were recorded in high def or remastered/re-transferred off of film into high def, well, high def won't make them any more entertaining.

      Don't get me wrong; I like high-def TV. I just won't sit gawking at PBS and discovery shows just for the sake of pixel peeping, at least, not after the TV is calibrated and I'm through playing with it. ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    13. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

      USB keys taking over is possible, but given that the production cost of a DVD is about $0.70 per DVD, the price of producing a USB key will have to fall significantly before this will work.

    14. Re:Betamax vs. VHS by getuid() · · Score: 1

      USB keys have a far superior form factor, and the installed players need only have a USB port and whatever processing is needed to actually view the movie.

      Hm... Why not take this a step further, and use, say, a USB-ish device with a DVI plug instead of an USB plug, and a built-in MPEG decoder? :-) You could probably then plug the device itself (a.k.a. the "media") directly to your TV, your projector, your monitor... whatever.

  5. One positive by wcrowe · · Score: 2, Funny

    One thing about movies on USB keys: At least they won't be scratched like they can be on DVDs.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:One positive by prgrmr · · Score: 1

      Nope, just run through the washer and dryer, or taken to the drycleaner and lost forever.

    2. Re:One positive by AuralityKev · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I imagine it would be easy to sell in places like airports. Need a flash drive for a few extra GB on the plane? Why not one that already has a bit of entertainment on it? From TFA I don't beleive it's meant to be just a movie conveyance.

    3. Re:One positive by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      One thing about movies on USB keys: At least they won't be scratched like they can be on DVDs.

      That's a good point. The couple USB keys I own are just about the most durable pieces of electronics I've ever run across. They've been dropped, stepped on, run through both the washer and dryer repeatedly (I'll remember to check my pockets one of these days), and still work perfectly. I have some DVDs that have been scratched just from trying to play them, and if you look at them cross eyed they skip.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    4. Re:One positive by FlyByPC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've actually had USB drives survive the washer-and-dryer bit. Not that I'd recommend it, but it's not necessarily fatal.

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    5. Re:One positive by aitikin · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too. In fact all but one of the USB flash drives I own have been through the wash and all still work fine.

      Heck, even my brother's original iPod Shuffle (the one that looks like a regular flash drive) has been through the wash a number of times and still is fine.

      --
      "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
    6. Re:One positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got the same experience with one of mine, except that it was formatted when I tried to read it.

      Not kidding here, partition map was still there but not the vfat table.

      I've seen delete/format utility doing a worst job ;)

    7. Re:One positive by Armakuni · · Score: 1

      I won't buy this USB stick, it is scratched.

      --
      That's not Picasso, that's Kandinsky!
    8. Re:One positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually this *is* an advantage. I get lazy sometimes and leave DVDs and CDs mixed up all over the place. They can get scratched, warped, damaged by sun. There's all kinds of bad things that can happen with CDs and DVDs. The problem is IMO, that if companies want to sell higher-res DVDs only like Blu-Ray its going to be really expensive to get the memory in a high volume, low cost to sell.

    9. Re:One positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me too... pulled out of the clean laundry bag and it still works fine.

    10. Re:One positive by stm2 · · Score: 1

      The couple USB keys I own are just about the most durable pieces of electronics I've ever run across

      Seems you didn't try Atari 2600 cartridges.

      --
      DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
    11. Re:One positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had them survive washer and dryer multiple times. Yes, I am forgetful. I've also had one come back to me functional in my coat pocket from the dry cleaners, though that makes me worry if they do anything other than spray starch and fabreeze on my dry clean only clothes =/ I can do this on my own for 6 bucks for the month rather than 1.50 a shirt =/

    12. Re:One positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange. I accidentally washed my USB key too, and it came out the 058 key. Does the Architect layer all of us in Arial over monospace? And should I be concerned about the Maytag repairman dressed in black suit and shades?

      \\//_

    13. Re:One positive by Sandbags · · Score: 1

      Sure, they're just succeptable to static discharge, water, excess heat, beaing sat on in your pocket, falling out of your pocket, being eaten by the dog, being swiped by kids/friends, they won't play in set top boxes just full computers.

      On the off hand, that scratchable disk should be copied, and put away somewhere,m and if you scratch the copy, you're only out 0.32 cents.

      --
      There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
    14. Re:One positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Water only causes electronics to break because it produces short circuits: it acts as a conductor and connects parts of the circuit that weren't meant to be connected.

      There's no electric current in a flash drive when it's unplugged, so water doesn't do anything (apart from perhaps corroding the circuit, but that's not a problem). So running it through the washer and then plugging it in will probably break it, but as long as you put it through the dryer too it works.

      I've actually got anecdotal evidence of this.

    15. Re:One positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once dropped mine in a glass of Pepsi, and figuring it was ruined I threw it into the washer and dryer for kicks. It's a bit more difficult to slide the port out now but it still works fine once it was dried.

    16. Re:One positive by Loibisch · · Score: 1

      I once went swimming with one in a lake because I forgot I had it on my keychain. I realized it halfway through the lake and decided that now it was too late anyway and didn't hurry out of the water. Left it in the sun to dry afterwards and it works to this day (although it's not being used anymore...it's a rather old 256MB Samsung stick).

    17. Re:One positive by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Pirate 1: [holding a LaserDisc] Help yourself, mates: a chest full of video discs.
      Pirate 2: No!
      Pirate 3: What good are they?
      Pirate 4: Can't record on 'em.
      Pirate 2: They're not compatible with my system.
      --Amazon Women on the Moon, "Video Pirates"

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  6. DRM? laughable by Rinisari · · Score: 1

    The DRM will be broken as soon as the first reasonably intelligent person gets his or her hands on one.

    1. Re:DRM? laughable by drakethegreat · · Score: 1

      Yes sir because unlike Bluray or HDDVD, it doesn't cost tons of money to get a player hooked up to a computer.

    2. Re:DRM? laughable by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      There is some good USB based DRM solutions, that when implemented correctly would be pretty difficult to get the stuff off of. Something like the Wibu Key and its codemeter product.

      http://wibu.com/start.php?lang=en

      It actually keeps all keys on the key itself, and they cannot be lifted (though they can be set).

      Fun technology but I doubt that this specific product goes that far as the Wibu key is expensive.

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    3. Re:DRM? laughable by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      If it can be played, it can be copied.

      If nothing else, write your own video and audio drivers that "displays" the movie to a file.

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    4. Re:DRM? laughable by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Informative

      If I can play it, I can copy it.

      I am sure Windows has an equivalent of the following: "mplayer /media/disk/Ghostbusters.avi -dumpstream"

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:DRM? laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you actually believe this or are you just being funny?

    6. Re:DRM? laughable by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Yes, I believe it's something like:
      vlc -I dummy "E:\Ghostbusters.avi" :sout='#transcode{vcodec=mp2v,vb=4096,acodec=mp2a,ab=192,scale=1,channels=2,deinterlace,audio-sync}:std{access=file, mux=ps,url="C:\Ghostbusters.ps.mpg"}' vlc:quit

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    7. Re:DRM? laughable by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
      vlc -I dummy "E:\Ghostbusters.avi" :sout='#transcode{vcodec=mp2v,vb=4096,acodec=mp2a,ab=192,scale=1,channels=2,deinterlace,audio-sync}:std{access=file, mux=ps,url="C:\Ghostbusters.ps.mpg"}'

      And this is why Windows is fine for nerds and hobbyists, but not ready for the mainstream desktop.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    8. Re:DRM? laughable by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I hope someone rips it and then emails it to her.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:DRM? laughable by Buzz_Litebeer · · Score: 1

      I was discussing this specific piece of hardware. I would be very confident in it having programmed the product for a short time.

      The only thing is that it would require a secure channel through the system.

      --
      If you don't vote, you don't matter, so don't waste your time telling me your opinion
    10. Re:DRM? laughable by rhyre · · Score: 1
      Hmm, I'm not sure if this is:
      • cirumvention for use (on Linux), but it might also be
      • cirumvention for access

      I know - we'll let a judge decide!

    11. Re:DRM? laughable by dasuser · · Score: 1

      Yes. It's called the Windows port of mplayer.

    12. Re:DRM? laughable by caluml · · Score: 1

      But seriously though, the VLC command line is insanely retarded. No man page, but vlc --help, and vlc -H for more stuff. It's just horrible. Although I do use it a lot for streaming, multicasting, reencoding, etc.

    13. Re:DRM? laughable by sootman · · Score: 1

      That's why I like Macs. They're much easier to use. For example:
      ~/bin/HandBrakeCLI --input ~/Desktop/SIMPSONS_S10_D2/VIDEO_TS/ -o ~/Desktop/S10D2/1.mp4 --title 1 -f mp4 --width 640 --height 480 --vb 1500 --deinterlace --two-pass --encoder x264
      See? :-)

      (Actually, Handbrake has a nifty GUI. I only use the command line for DVDs that crash the GUI when loading, like two of the four discs in Season 10 of The Simpsons.)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    14. Re:DRM? laughable by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Ugh, would it have killed them to have added a drop down box for audio and subtitle tracks to the GUI for the mac version?

      Fortunately handbrake covers most things but occasionally there's stuff it won't read and it's time to bust out VLC in the terminal to get the contents of my dvd into my media center.

    15. Re:DRM? laughable by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's called mplayer for windows. :)

    16. Re:DRM? laughable by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      How's this different than HandbrakeCLI for Linux?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    17. Re:DRM? laughable by sootman · · Score: 1

      Probably not at all. Just continuing the joke about CLIs and usability. The snippet above, by the way, is in fact valid HB code, assuming you've already copied the DVD's VIDEO_TS folder to your desktop.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    18. Re:DRM? laughable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VLC runs on Windows too, you tool. And uh, you posted a command line script to a tech website to show how cool you are and you call OTHER people 'nerds'?

      What the fuck, is your sense of self-awareness broken?

  7. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

    No to mention the wasted space on the device...

    Wonder though.. could you use dd to make a disc image of the whole drive and then mount it as loop and have it work?

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  8. Denied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    A spokesperson for PNY explained that it comes with a form of DRM that prevents you from copying the movie.

    Aw. That's adorable.

    1. Re:Denied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG PNYs!

      Allow me to translate: A spokesperson for PNY explained that it comes with a form of DRM that temporarily delays children and the technologically inept from copying the movie.

    2. Re:Denied by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHA I agree. Who here has ever heard of bit for bit copying? Not me, I mean, but I know someone here has....

      And that someone, might know a few open source tools to help me or er a pirate to "recover" some bits that were lost...

      Perhaps someone wants to practice their bit recovering technique on the drive?

      What's that? I'm not logged in? damn, I didn't want to be anonymous here!

  9. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by orclevegam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't rip it, can't archive it, can't move it to my HDD without the dongle. And if the flash drive gets damaged, who you gonna call?

    The pirate bay.

    --
    Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
  10. "Go ahead and steal it", says spokesman by jfengel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You probably can't even get Ghostbusters down at your local "Three DVDs for $20" guy on the corner; his stock is all newer. Everybody who wants this movie already has it. I can't even imagine who they expect to sell it to, except as a novelty.

    Presumably they're keeping an eye on how long it will take for the DRM to be broken. People will break it for the challenge and because they hate DRM, but it's like stealing cockroaches from my kitchen: you're welcome to it.

    1. Re:"Go ahead and steal it", says spokesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presumably they're keeping an eye on how long it will take for the DRM to be broken. People will break it for the challenge...

      THAT movie? Give me a break. Sorry, not even for "the challenge". Takes me less time to find it in the "ten for a dollar!" bin at [insert your local Made-in-China distribution warehouse here].

    2. Re:"Go ahead and steal it", says spokesman by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Well, there is a new video game being released next year, so I'm sure the Super Ectoplasm editions of the movies will also be released at the same time.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ghostbusters:_The_Video_Game

    3. Re:"Go ahead and steal it", says spokesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Family Video had it as their deal of the day for $3.95 a couple months back. HotMovieSale offers it for 25 cents, but you have to cancel a "savings club" membership they enroll you in (NOT WORTH IT). Not sure what the demand is on this movie, but it is no doubt a classic.

      A 4 GB SDHC card is $10.

      An 8 GB micro SDHC card is $27.

      By the time Blu-ray Disc player prices come down to a reasonable level, I think flash media sales of movies, etc. are going to squash them.

      Imagine sending a re-usable micro SDHC card to the local movie joint for a rental to be imprinted.

      The other area where movie sales are heating up is on-demand over the internet. You don't even have to go to the mailbox.

    4. Re:"Go ahead and steal it", says spokesman by kat_skan · · Score: 1

      You probably can't even get Ghostbusters down at your local "Three DVDs for $20" guy on the corner; his stock is all newer.

      You need a better "Three DVDs for $20" guy. Even the Best Buy downtown has it bundled with Ghostbusters II and (for some reason) a book for fifteen clams.

    5. Re:"Go ahead and steal it", says spokesman by KC7GR · · Score: 1

      "...but it's like stealing cockroaches from my kitchen..."

      Somebody saw a cockroach up on 12. Big one, too. Bite your head off.

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

    6. Re:"Go ahead and steal it", says spokesman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They taste better than you think, man.

  11. correction by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    The DRM will be broken as soon as the first reasonably intelligent person

    who doesn't already own a copy of ghostbusters

    gets his or her hands on one.

    Which probably makes for a rather small set of people.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:correction by berashith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The industry is looking to set a record on longest lived DRM scheme. Everyone has this already, so no one will need to crack it, and a presentation will go to a CEO somewhere about this new scheme that has not been broken in over a week.

  12. 2GB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't be too great of quality at that size. Plus DRM? Boy, sure sounds like a winner.

    1. Re:2GB? by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      DVD quality takes less than 1/4 of a DVDs size. On 2 gigs you could get maybe half a nearly bluray quality movie, properly encoded.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:2GB? by PAjamian · · Score: 1

      You'd be surprised. Nowadays, they're packing up to 8 movies on a dual layer DVD (just over 1 gig each) and the quality isn't that bad. You can get avi rips off the internet that are less than 800 megs and they're pretty good too. I can easily see them putting a decent quality movie on a 2 gig USB key.

      --
      Windows is a bonfire, Linux is the sun. Linux only looks smaller if you lack perspective.
  13. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can't put it on a portable media player, either. What's the point of digital media you can't take on the go?

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  14. DONGLE? by arizwebfoot · · Score: 1

    Does anybody remember Dongles? Is this a glimpse of the future for DRM's - having to have a flash drive or dongle to play your music/movie/whatever?


    -- I for one welcome our Dongle Overlords.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:DONGLE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, dongles

    2. Re:DONGLE? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      With ever increasing broadband the future is in bittorrent, no DRM.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    3. Re:DONGLE? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Does anybody remember Dongles? Is this a glimpse of the future for DRM's - having to have a flash drive or dongle to play your music/movie/whatever?

      Isn't a CSS-encumbered DVD under the DMCA technically a dongle? At least, that was the DVD CCA's contention against Kaleidescape. Which they lost.

      Though I suspect they've updated their licensing agreement so that future devices do have to require the disk be present to play a copy off the hard drive.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  15. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Aladrin · · Score: 1

    Sounds like there is DRM embedded in the video stream, so there's no way to decode it unless you have the right codec, which will look for the USB key.

    It also sounds like it'll be locked to Windows, since I doubt they put that much effort into making it for Linux as well... Or even OSX.

    It's really sad, because it's not like that's a hard movie to get... DVD, Divx... Just about every format imaginable is available on the web for that one.

    --
    "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
  16. Some advice for users: by jd · · Score: 4, Funny
    • Those watching on HURD must NOT cross the STREAMS
    • BSD users should try to avoid summoning Daemons
    • This video contains excellent girl-getting advice for those Slashdot readers who collect spores, moulds and fungi
    • Windows users are advised to scan for indications of rootkits, goddesses and crazed dogs
    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Some advice for users: by hal2814 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Windows would have been fine if dickless here hadn't shut off the main power grid.

    2. Re:Some advice for users: by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      Windows would have been fine if dickless here hadn't shut off the main power grid.

      Actually, I *prefer* Windows with the power grid shut off.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    3. Re:Some advice for users: by changa · · Score: 1

      Yes it's true, this man has no dick.

    4. Re:Some advice for users: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's true, Windows has no dick.

    5. Re:Some advice for users: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that true?

    6. Re:Some advice for users: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows would have been fine if dickless here hadn't shut off the main power grid.

      Is this true?

    7. Re:Some advice for users: by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      HURD? I thought it was SysV (e.g. Solaris) users who had to worry about crossing the STREAMS. HURD has ports.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Some advice for users: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Is this true?"

    9. Re:Some advice for users: by RincewindTVD · · Score: 1

      Is this true?

    10. Re:Some advice for users: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. This man has no dick.

  17. DRM mechanism messes up your computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Worse than starforce.

    Damn thing is coated in an ectoplasm that clogs the fuck out of your USB ports.

    1. Re:DRM mechanism messes up your computer by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Clearly you don't know what you're talking about. Ectoplasm evaporates. I think you were doing something else with you USB ports.

  18. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 4, Funny

    With apologies to Ray Parker, Jr.:

    If there's D-R-M, on your movie now,
    Who ya gonna call?

    The Pirate Bay!

    If the U-S-B, key just died,
    Who ya gonna call?

    The Pirate Bay!

    dooodooodit doo dit do dit doo dit doooo dit doooo dit dooo dooo dit dododo

    I ain't afraid of no cops.

    dooodooodit doo dit do dit doo dit doooo dit doooo dit dooo dooo dit dododo
    I ain't afraid of no cops.

  19. I unlocked the DRM!!! by CaptainPatent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently if it asks you if you're a god, you say YES!

    --
    Well, back to rejecting software patent applications.
    1. Re:I unlocked the DRM!!! by nick.ian.k · · Score: 5, Funny

      Odd, I got mine Jeopardy-style: "During the third reconciliation of the last of the Meketrex supplicants, they chose this form for Gozer the Traveler."

    2. Re:I unlocked the DRM!!! by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      Mine was "STAY PUFT".

    3. Re:I unlocked the DRM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What is a Slor?

    4. Re:I unlocked the DRM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      All I had to do was cross the streams.

    5. Re:I unlocked the DRM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is a Giant Sloar, Alex?

    6. Re:I unlocked the DRM!!! by a.deity · · Score: 1

      What is that of a giant sloar?

      --
      Option-Shift-K.
    7. Re:I unlocked the DRM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a giant slor?

      (or, shoot, was it a large and moving torg? I was always bad at ancient history)

    8. Re:I unlocked the DRM!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is a giant Slore. I'll take "Potent Potables" for $800, Alex.

  20. How is this better than DVD? by pembo13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Considering the DRM, how is it better than a regular DVD?

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:How is this better than DVD? by wattrlz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can erase it and store actual information on it?

    2. Re:How is this better than DVD? by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Considering the DRM, how is it better than a regular DVD?
      Given that a DVD has at least 4.5GB of storage and this USB device is 2GB, I am reckoning that this is not better in any way. In fact its worse: lower quality, unknown DRM and probably the likelyhood that you are screwed if you are using anything but Redmond's OS of choice.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    3. Re:How is this better than DVD? by Paradigm_Complex · · Score: 1

      Durability and longevity.

      --
      "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
    4. Re:How is this better than DVD? by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Ok. I guess that's more efficient than tossing optical media away after.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    5. Re:How is this better than DVD? by hymie! · · Score: 1

      Given that a DVD has at least 4.5GB of storage and this USB device is 2GB, I am reckoning that this is not better in any way.

      Don't confuse the two statements

      A DVD can store 4.5GB of data

      The data on this DVD is 4.5GB.

    6. Re:How is this better than DVD? by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Considering the DRM, how is it better than a regular DVD?

      Well, the bitrate is no more that half what the DVD version uses.

      And the physical media is a format that is not compatible with the home theater systems in most people's living rooms.

      Oh, and there's no guarantee the data will be in a format that my computer can play, either, and it's almost certain to cost more than the price of a used DVD copy and a blank flash drive together would.

      SO obviously it is far superior to a regular DVD.

    7. Re:How is this better than DVD? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Besides it being more durable, a multi-'disk' changer would be dramatically cheaper. You can put up to 256 devices on a usb port. Now, I understand that nobody does this because there isn't enough bandwidth to handle 256 devices, but since we are talking about movies on a single device, it seems reasonable to assume that you would only play from one at a time. So, if players were built to play movies from USB, then you could convert your single 'disk' player into a 4 'disk' player by just adding a small hub. If the player included say, 6 USB ports, you could have more movies installed than most people will ever have.

      Don't take this as an endorsement of a DRM encumbered format. Just a note on the benefit of USB vs. DVD.

    8. Re:How is this better than DVD? by Mprx · · Score: 1

      DVDs use MPEG-2, which is old and inefficient. 2GB would be adequate for a DVD-resolution encode using a modern codec such as H.264.

    9. Re:How is this better than DVD? by funkatron · · Score: 1

      Using a modern codec would probably break compatibility with most of their customers' systems. Windows media player doesn't even seem to come with dvd support so anything decent isn't going to work.

      --
      "Welcome to our world. We are the wasted youth. And we are the future too." Yes, I know these are stupid lyrics.
    10. Re:How is this better than DVD? by Renraku · · Score: 1

      "Its much better than a DVD", says PNY-sponsored media industry analyst.

      "With this new form of media, you no longer have to worry about scratched DVDs. Furthermore, we can implement hardware-level prot..err..bonus..devices to improve your experiences with our product. In the long run, this will help to curb piracy and raise our profits, thus ensuring that our movies remain at the same price point for longer, and that we have more available funds for sequels such as Gigli 2: Electric Boogaloo, and Superman vs Catwoman."

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    11. Re:How is this better than DVD? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That's ok, I'm sure customers can just download the proprietary media player from a web site. Since they already bought something that's DRM-encumbered they surely won't mind installing useless crap on their computer just to play it.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  21. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    Oh come on. You're not buying the movie, it's a "value add". It's a stupid gimmick, but the usual soulful bemoaning of DRM is more than a little silly in this case. If it gets damaged, you've lost it, just like any other product. If I buy a keyboard or a hard drive or a glass crack pipe and it breaks, I've lost the product. I find DRM whining to be nonsensical.

  22. all aboard the failboat by DragonTHC · · Score: 0

    Flash memory has a finite lifespan, making it altogether unfit for this purpose. What happens when your usb key fails?

    It's not quite the same as your DVD getting scratches.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:all aboard the failboat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Flash memory has a finite lifespan

      I'd be quite interested in learning what formats have infinite lifespans...

    2. Re:all aboard the failboat by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Modern Flash has a very long lifetime.
      "What happens when your usb key fails?"
      same thing that happens when your DVD fails.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:all aboard the failboat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or when it gets struck by a lightning.

    4. Re:all aboard the failboat by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Flash memory has a finite lifespan for the number of writes it can take, which these days works out to be several years. It also has a finite lifespan for the number of successful reads, which is what we're talking about here, that is so long you will have a machine with no USB port before you can't read it.

    5. Re:all aboard the failboat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of it as an optical disk player with a built in piece of sandpaper.

      =)

    6. Re:all aboard the failboat by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      You said "Flash memory has a finite lifespan for the number of writes it can take, which these days works out to be several years."

      Do you realize that the number of writes is not a measure of time, right?

      Its a measure of the number of writes and cannot be translated into time. You would have to include a scaler value with a time dimension in order to translate the number of writes into time. One such scaler value might be writes per second (commonly denoted writes/second.) With both the mean maximum number of sustainable writes and the number of writes per second, we could then calculate some measure of device lifetime.

      My 10 year old 64 meg compact flash card that originally came with my digital camera still works fine. Modern flash memory has a relative lifetime several orders of magnitude larger. Here, I get to evoke the measure of time without considering writes/second because I am simply comparing relative values both with a time dimension.

      Have a nice day.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    7. Re:all aboard the failboat by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      gold masters have infinite lifespans as far as I know.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    8. Re:all aboard the failboat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not quite the same as your DVD getting scratches.

      Now you tell me...
       
      /me tries to get scratch cleaning solution out of his dead USB key.

      Anybody got a cotton swab?

    9. Re:all aboard the failboat by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      I'll take 1000 of your infinite lifespan data storage devices please.

    10. Re:all aboard the failboat by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      Uh, yes, as frequently as the topic is discussed in Slashdot threads, I didn't feel the need to include the phrase "given typical usage patterns." I figured anybody reading it would understand that's what "works out to be" implies. But feel free to be pedantic.

      That wasn't the point, anyway. The point was reads, which are apparently so reliable that nobody feels the need to quote read reliability at all. According to this, flash memory can be read up to 100,000 times before it needs to be refreshed. Given the date on the article is 2006, I speculate that more modern flash memory chips may include built-in refresh circuitry.

    11. Re:all aboard the failboat by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Indeed.. but if we are to truely remain true to topic... who in their right mind is going to play Ghost Busters 100,000 times? There is no "typical usage pattern" for Movies on USB Keys, and when there finally (if ever) is such a thing, its going to be way less than 100,000 times.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  23. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by tom17 · · Score: 1

    Then they are lying on the Argos web page...

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=952461&cid=24862147

  24. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by maxume · · Score: 1

    The deeper issue is that it is ridiculously overpriced.

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  25. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    There is a point in the process between the USB Data and sending it to the display and sound. That is where the weekness is. Sure there is always the analog loophole. But you can get quality loss there. But for the hackers there is a spot where the data is sent and unencrypted and uncompressed that is probably sitting on your PC's Memory Before it sends it to the screen. If it is windows only then it may be some extra work, but nothing impossible... Heck a hardware hacker could probably find a way to duplicate and queue the memory up rather easy without the OS knowing what is happening. But for Linux a couple of kernel hacks and maybe a pipe to the tee command would do the trick. And like any other form of DRM it really only needs to be cracked once and spread for it to be useless.

    I undersand the want for these companies for DRM however it is a fools game where you put so much money and effort and acheaving nothing from it. The black market has always been in competition with the legal market and there is only so much they can do until the Legal market can find a way to be competitive with the black market.

    I would think fancy artistic box covers have done more to keep piracy down then any DRM has ever had. I would suggest that they make their Media DRM free but put more effort in its box art and presntation of their media.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  26. USB keychain movies by sjonke · · Score: 1

    I think this is cool, but it will it work with my USB keychain changer?

    --
    --- What?
  27. No novelty packaging.. fail! by Rob+Kaper · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can see this take off actually, the product allows for all sort of novelty packaging and product shapes. Forget about browsing the alphabet of your closet to find Spider-Man, just find the Spider-Man shaped USB key! Collecting large quantities might make organised storage a bit of a challenge though.

    Does USB mass storage provide a way to ensure read-only access though? I wouldn't want some virus to have the potential to delete my porn, erm, Star Trek collection.

  28. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Threni · · Score: 4, Informative

    > With apologies to Ray Parker, Jr.:

    who in turn apologizes and makes a substantial payment to Huey Lewis for shamelessly ripping his tune off.

  29. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can I play it with the video player of my choosing or do I have to install yet another video player? I don't really want to have 10 different video players on my system. I don't want to have to maintain/update every one of them. I don't want each of them thinking they need to change file associations.

  30. Not Impressed by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    So you need to have this USB key to play the movie (some hidden key file or internal serial number one suspects). That means we're back to hard to replicate dongles. Clearly the USB stick is of little use otherwise singe the movie takes up the bulk of the space on it (unless it's compressed down to crap quality), you can't plug it into your DVD player or television, and you need to take another one for each additional movie. Do you really want to go on a trip with 20 dongles just so that you can watch 20 movies? And I doubt it plays on your iPod.

    I'm not impressed.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Not Impressed by tepples · · Score: 1

      you can't plug it into your DVD player or television

      But don't most vocal Slashdot users already have a home theater PC?

    2. Re:Not Impressed by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      hard to replicate? only for the consumer.

      A buddy of mine had a dongle that would satisfy 12 different apps. and it could be updated to add more or change the apps it made happy. He bought it for $59.00 in 1997. He recently got his hands on a USB dongle that would satisfy high end apps like AVID and other apps.

      The dongle is cracked hard, always has been.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  31. Physical media by SamSim · · Score: 1

    Physical media? Pff, what century is this?

    1. Re:Physical media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it was ectoplasm I'd be impressed...

  32. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    And if you buy a keyboard with a glass crack pipe built in, and one of them breaks, then you are really boned.

  33. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by camperdave · · Score: 1

    I like to own media and do what I want

    You do own the media. It's just the contents of the media, the message if you will, that you don't own.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  34. HAHAHAHAHAHA! by DarthVain · · Score: 0

    First off, the DRM will be broken in about 3 seconds, as has been pointed out by many.

    Secondly, no one will have to break the DRM as no one is going to buy this POS.

    What I was wondering is how much does the think cost? If you follow the link to buy:

    Its 30$....

    In British Pounds (60$ US).....

    For Ghostbusters....

    on a 2GB thumb drive that costs 10$ (maybe!) which is crippled by DRM.

    and being only 2GB you know the resolution will crap. (By crap I mean certainly not HD, and probably not even up to DVD standards. I expect your standard 280x320 (or whatever the std is for TV) POS, good for an old school TV but not much else).

    Seriously ghostbusters? I mean it is a classic and has a cult status, but really most people would expect to pay 5.99$ Canadian at Walmart for that.

    Anyway a joke. What were they smoking when they came up with this idea! lol

    1. Re:HAHAHAHAHAHA! by Etrias · · Score: 1

      And that's using Canadian money!


      (That was much funnier before the dollar tanked.)

    2. Re:HAHAHAHAHAHA! by sm62704 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As I can't fathom cocaine users, I asked a crack whore why she thought the coke shooters running the movie studios would do this.

      "Sure, I'll tell you, but it'll cost you twenty dollars".

      "Twenty dollars??? Sorry, babe, I'll buy you a double cheeseburger at McDonalds, how's that?"

      "OK, that'll do. See, they want this to FAIL and fail hard. They're doing this to prove that the concept is unworkable."

      "Ok, I'll take you to McDonalds now."

      "Man, I ain't goin' nowhere, I'm tweakin', dude. Just go get the burger, it's for my dog anyway, I'm not hungry. OK?"

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  35. Too costly, too ubiquitous by dazedNconfuzed · · Score: 1

    While it's fine for a small-physical-format solid-state distribution medium, it's just too costly compared to (piracy aside) a DVD copy at $5-10. If the device's price were reduced for such content, fine ... but since a common 2GB thumbdrive is about $10, by what sanity is paying a >$20 premium to have just one movie thereon (and occupying significant space) reasonable?

    Thing is, you get a thumbdrive to haul data around in ... and do you really want to be constantly hauling the same single movie around with a bunch of other data? No. We're not talking an iPod which has your whole CD or DVD collection handily available, we're talking a device which you'll keep handy yet is significantly devoted to one content which you won't watch much.

    Imagine carrying around the Ghostbusters DVD all the time. Preposterous, no? This may be marginally more convenient, but still goofy.

    --
    Can we get a "-1 Wrong" moderation option?
    1. Re:Too costly, too ubiquitous by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      No, but a library of thumbdrive movies is an intriguing idea. Keep in mind that the "lots of space" of your thumbdrive is mostly occupied by a protective enclosure that you never need to remove. If you include the DVD *case* in the equation, thumbdrive films would be a significant space saver.

      It's the cost that keeps it from happening. If usb sticks were as cheap to produce as stamped polycarbonate disks, everyone would already be well into replacing their collections with them.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  36. The better question... by pcolaman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How long before the DRM is cracked? I'll be generous and give it a month, tops.

  37. It's a sign of the end... by barnyjr · · Score: 1

    USB movies, human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!

  38. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Wasted space? What about wasted money? £29.99 for a 2gig pendrive with a film or £4.50 for one without.

    Buy the DVD and rip it and still save yourself over £20.

  39. More Sane DRM (such as it is)? by Sniper511 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, ok, it'll be broken in 5 minutes. With y'all there. ;)

    But this is an interesting idea (if the industry is going to continue to insist upon DRM)... the only problem I have with it is whether a USB key for each movie would be too hard to manage and keep track of.

    1. Re:More Sane DRM (such as it is)? by Coraon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, ok, it'll be broken in 5 minutes. With y'all there. ;) But this is an interesting idea (if the industry is going to continue to insist upon DRM)...the only problem is people will stop paying for media with DRM when they get sick of the hassle involved in DRM.

      There fixed it for you.

      --
      -Ours is the wisdom of Solomon, the magic of Merlyn, the fall of Icaris.
    2. Re:More Sane DRM (such as it is)? by Sniper511 · · Score: 1

      Dude, we're already headed that way. All I'm wondering is if this is the INDUSTRY's last ditch attempt at DRM before abandoning it entirely.

  40. PC/Laptop? by jrothwell97 · · Score: 1

    so customers can download the movie onto their laptop or PC if they wish,

    But a laptop is a PC...

    I don't see the point in this. It seems that simply shifting between media is not the way to go: film downloads are the future. Be they rentals or outright purchases, movie downloads are going to kill the physically-sold film. (With devices like home entertainment computers and Apple TVs, it's just a matter of time.)

    --
    Those using pirated Tinysoft signatures(TM) are a real threat to society and should all be thrown in jail.
    1. Re:PC/Laptop? by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      My laptop running Ubuntu is also a PC.

      I bet that isn't supported by their DRM.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
  41. USB scratch remover by flyingfsck · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can sell you a can of high tech USB scratch remover. For only $19.99, this spray will remove scratches, improve picture quality and cure your herpes, but wait, now for a limited time offer you can get TWO cans for only $39.99...

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:USB scratch remover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the end gold plated... Because I won't buy things unless the ends are gold plated.

    2. Re:USB scratch remover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (...)For only $19.99, this spray will remove scratches,(...)
      (...)now for a limited time offer you can get TWO cans for only $39.99...

      I don't get it.
      If I buy one I pay $19.99 per can.
      If I buy two, considering your limited offer, I pay $19.99 + half a cent per can. It's more expensive.

      If you want to sell snake oil, at least make sense in a mathematical way.

    3. Re:USB scratch remover by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      What a ripe off.
      I just got a Flashdrive demagnetizer. Not some crappy one but an videophile quality one. It cost $856 and worth every penny. You can really see the difference. Well if you have good equipment like my gold plated balanced HDMI cable and my stabilized granite table that I keep my gear on.
      Of course you know the average person is just blind and death and can not hear or see the subtlety that good video and audio gear offer.

      And yes I am soooo kidding.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:USB scratch remover by hxftw · · Score: 1

      I can sell you a GOLD plated USB port dongle. The GOLD helps the digital signal and you can get the most out of the SUPER SONIC range of your audio. The best part, it plugs right into any regular USB port!!!

      --
      Just because an idea is popular doesn't make it right.
    5. Re:USB scratch remover by Deadplant · · Score: 1

      well, if you're putting it through the washer regularly you might actually want gold because it won't rust.

    6. Re:USB scratch remover by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      Of course you know the average person is just blind and death and can not hear or see the subtlety that good video and audio gear offer.

      If they're death then what does it matter if they're blind?

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    7. Re:USB scratch remover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could use that, my herpes is acting up. I can't spare a twenty spot, but I'll trade you a can for a USB drive rewinder.

    8. Re:USB scratch remover by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. If I buy one I pay $19.99 per can. If I buy two, considering your limited offer, I pay $19.99 + half a cent per can. It's more expensive. If you want to sell snake oil, at least make sense in a mathematical way.

      WHOOSH!!!

      That's the sound of the joke flying above your head as it goes by.

    9. Re:USB scratch remover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to sell snake oil, at least make sense in a mathematical way.

      By definition, people who buy snake oil aren't going to be smart enough to do the math. His mistake was in trying to profit only by an extra cent.

    10. Re:USB scratch remover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHOOSH.

  42. I am the chosen keymaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Are you the USB keymaster?"

    Yes, I manage to plug in the usb key the right way every time. Seriously, is this statement supposed to get me excited about limiting the access to my own computer with DRM? I'll pass.

    1. Re:I am the chosen keymaster by edraven · · Score: 1

      Haven't seen the film, then?

  43. heh by geekoid · · Score: 1

    " A spokesperson for PNY explained that it comes with a form of DRM that prevents you from copying the movie. "

    BWAHAHAHAHAHahahha

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:heh by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      "A spokesperson for PNY explained that it comes with a form of DRM that prevents you from copying the movie. Because, you know, there are like so many forms of DRM that don't prevent you from copying it, and like this one is better. Oh shit, like, did I say that out loud?"

      I like it better this way.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  44. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by click2005 · · Score: 1

    Its hardly 'value add' when they're asking £23 more for the version with the movie on it.

    --
    I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
  45. What's the obsession? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

    What is this obsession or draw to people thinking it's fun to watch movies on your computer? My computer room, and by extension my little 24 and 28" monitors are NOT the place I find comfortable to sit down and watch movies.

    I realize some people have media center PC's, as do I, but I know I am in the very small minority. Full blown media PC's that can play movies off of USB are rare and not a lucrative market. So why this obsession with movies ON the PC? Now, if I had something like a DVD player that had a USB slot where I stick the USB key in and the movie starts playing, I could understand it... but I do not, and will not ever want to watch a movie in my computer room.

    If I have a full blown media PC that can play this USB stick,then I sure as hell likely have a full blown broadband connection... so just let the download the movie. Why fuss around with hardware that's not needed? Hardware that will have certain requirements beyond what's required for a downloaded movie?

    I won't be buying any movies on USB keys, that's for sure, just like I refuse to by physical media of any sort. I want to play it where, when and HOW I want... the USB key limits that, so who needs it?

    1. Re:What's the obsession? by Life+Liberty+Freedom · · Score: 1

      Well, some newer car stereos have USB ports so you can play mp3's off a Flash drive.

      The industry probably expects DVD Players (or even tv's) to have a USB port in which to plug this in and watch the movie. The fact this doesn't already exists on the market is irrelevant.

    2. Re:What's the obsession? by edraven · · Score: 1

      People bring laptops with them on the plane.

    3. Re:What's the obsession? by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      "What is this obsession or draw to people thinking it's fun to watch movies on your computer? "

      I often wonder that too. Never have I wanted to watch a movie on my camp vs. on my tv.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    4. Re:What's the obsession? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      What is this obsession or draw to people thinking it's fun to watch movies on your computer? My computer room, and by extension my little 24 and 28" monitors are NOT the place I find comfortable to sit down and watch movies.

      My "computer room" is very comfy. Widescreen laptop is fine for watching movies in bed.

      I don't own a TV, nor do I want one. I don't see the need for one.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    5. Re:What's the obsession? by Samizdata · · Score: 1

      I do admin work on a night shift, and it gets VERY quiet at night, so I run a variety of videos of an evening on my laptop. It has also come in handy when traveling via Southwest Air.

      --
      It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage. - Colonel Henry Walton Jones, Jr., Ph.D.
    6. Re:What's the obsession? by lgw · · Score: 1

      You can buy audio receivers now that have USB ports, to play music directly from USB devices. I'd expect that, if you can't find a receiver that will play a movie directly from a USB device this year, you'll be able to next year.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    7. Re:What's the obsession? by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Well, some newer car stereos have USB ports so you can play mp3's off a Flash drive.

      The industry probably expects DVD Players (or even tv's) to have a USB port in which to plug this in and watch the movie. The fact this doesn't already exists on the market is irrelevant.

      The industry also expects me to buy their inferior product.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    8. Re:What's the obsession? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Xbox 360, and probably PS3, will happily play an MPEG4 movie off of a USB key. I've seen DVD players with flash slots and USB slots for pictures and what not; it won't be much longer (if there aren't already) such players that will happily play a movie from a USB key.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    9. Re:What's the obsession? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I don't have a nice surround sound system and a TV picture on a standard set is lower resolution than a PC. A reasonable set of headphones will give pretty decent surround sound (much better than a TV's speakers, anyway) and they give the added bonus that if there are other people in the house the noise doesn't bother them as much. Plus, why would I want extra hardware in my room? A multipurpose PC takes up less space than PC+TV+DVD player.

      I'd personally watch everything on my computer if I had the choice, including both movies and TV shows. Even if you want to have some friends over and watch it together you can always hook up some better speakers (portable guitar amp/speaker combo box for example, all you need is a 1/8-to-1/4" adapter plug) and if you have a large enough monitor you're set. Or you could hook it up to an LCD projector... which is very cool, and I'd recommend trying it sometime if you haven't already.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    10. Re:What's the obsession? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      I don't have a nice surround sound system and a TV picture on a standard set is lower resolution than a PC.

      Most people with an adequate computer for watching movies on their PC have a more modern set that has DVD quality resolution. After that, it doesn't matter what your monitor resolution is, until you get to HD movies... 1080p movies are pretty high resolution, even for a monitor, and I would say most monitors can't display 1080p in it's native resolution, so it's actually a downgrade to watch it on your monitor.

      A reasonable set of headphones will give pretty decent surround sound

      Umm, no. Just... no.

      Plus, why would I want extra hardware in my room? A multipurpose PC takes up less space than PC+TV+DVD player.

      I'd personally watch everything on my computer if I had the choice, including both movies and TV shows.

      I don't know why you'd want extra hardware in your room... I personally put my TV stuff in another room... you know, one big enough to hold it and be comfortable?

      Even if you want to have some friends over and watch it together you can always hook up some better speakers (portable guitar amp/speaker combo box for example, all you need is a 1/8-to-1/4" adapter plug)

      Haha, I don't even know what do say to this. Portable guitar amp/speaker, lol.

      and if you have a large enough monitor you're set. Or you could hook it up to an LCD projector... which is very cool, and I'd recommend trying it sometime if you haven't already.

      Yeah, cause that computer chair and those folding chairs you have for your friends are nice and comfy to watch movies in. I know I'd want to come over to your house and gather 'round the monitor for a good flick on a 24" screen and a tinny mono guitar amp/speaker box! Just like being at an old fashioned drive in, except less comfortable. They are also good for snuggling up with a woman and getting frisky. Oh... my mistake, I'm sure you're typical /. user, thus no women to worry about. :)

    11. Re:What's the obsession? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      We are talking about movies, not music. Movies are a whole different entertainment experience than music.

      Also, if you read the article, it requires DRM... which means specific hardware required. Just plugging in the stick in question isn't going to let the movie play. If you think the movie houses are going to just release unencumbered movies on a USB stick, you are dreaming.

    12. Re:What's the obsession? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      So you're saying it's more convenient for a USB stick to stick out of your laptop, which could get caught on something and wreck your USB ports than have it on your hard drive, or if you're so inclined, on a DVD that's enclosed and safe in your laptop?

      As someone who's had USB protrubances bumped and smashed on airplanes and other crowded areas, I can tell you it's a bad idea.

    13. Re:What's the obsession? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      Again, if you read the article, it has DRM, which requires specific hardware and software to allow it to play. Thus you can't stick it in your 360, PS3 or DVD player and expect it to play.

      If you think movie houses are going to release unencumbered DRM-Free movies on USB stick, dream on.

    14. Re:What's the obsession? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      So it's more convenient to have a USB stick sticking our of your computer than to have it on the hard drive or in the DVD rom drive? Certainly less safe as well.

    15. Re:What's the obsession? by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Given that the 360's upcoming update will allow it to stream Netflix, is it so out of the question that USBKeyMovieDRM could possibly be built in at a later time?

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    16. Re:What's the obsession? by edraven · · Score: 1

      Well, the question at hand was why do people want to watch movies on their computer at all, not specifically on a USB key.

    17. Re:What's the obsession? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      Ahh, if that's what you're referring to, then I can agree with your statements.

    18. Re:What's the obsession? by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      I'm going to have to say yes. Since MS is pushing their movie download service, I very seriously doubt they would allow a competing service like that on the Xbox 360.

      But again, it brings up the question - why not just download the movie instead of get it on a USB stick, if you already have the Xbox 360?

    19. Re:What's the obsession? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Most people with an adequate computer for watching movies on their PC have a more modern set that has DVD quality resolution.

      My 600Mhz Celeron with 256Mb of RAM plays DivX AVIs quite nicely (MP4 or RMVB not so much... and hi-def kills it). And no, I don't have a high-definition TV... which I'm sure comes as no surprise to you after hearing my PC's specs.

      and I would say most monitors can't display 1080p in it's native resolution, so it's actually a downgrade to watch it on your monitor.

      Since we're apparently taking about technophiles (which I'm admittedly not), what self-respecting technophile would own a monitor with a mere 1024x768 native resolution?

      A reasonable set of headphones will give pretty decent surround sound

      Umm, no. Just... no.

      Compared to the speakers on a TV. Or a computer, for that matter. The stereo speakers on a TV or PC differ in angle by only a few degrees (depending on how far away you're sitting, naturally) which hardly makes for good "surround" sound (ok, more like not at all).

      Yeah, cause that computer chair and those folding chairs you have for your friends are nice and comfy to watch movies in. I know I'd want to come over to your house and gather 'round the monitor for a good flick on a 24" screen and a tinny mono guitar amp/speaker box!

      Couches work well. My brother has a fairly nice guitar amp that's small enough to be moved into the room. As I said, I'm hardly a technophile and I don't have a surround sound system anyway. If it's a choice between the awful little speakers on a TV (or computer) and the guitar amp, the amp is going to give much better volume without sounding like gravel (and it has a built-in equalizer... like I said, it's a decent little amp).

      Basically, you might have a huge TV and a surround-sound system, but I don't have the cash to blow on that kind of setup. Headphones at least give 180-degree sound difference, and they'll sound louder before the signal starts to clip (because they're right next to your ears) — which also gives better sound quality because the high/low frequencies are represented better because of the lower volume. So yeah, I'd rather watch a movie on my PC with some headphones than on a TV with crappy built-in speakers.

      Plus, as I said before, if there are other people in the house (particularly young, curious, obnoxious people), you don't bother them (and, consequently, they don't come bother you... which is nice if you happened NOT to want to watch a movie with people watching over your shoulder).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  46. Quick! Somebody buy it! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    And tell us here how it works! ;)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  47. A bit pricey!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As much as I enjoy the movie £29.99 for a 2Gb stick seems extortionate!!

    Think I might stick the trilogy on my £8.99 Kingston 8Gb just for the sake of it.

  48. Oblig by YourExperiment · · Score: 5, Funny

    OMG PNY!!!

  49. Just because you can do it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... doesn't mean it is legal.

    Not that anything will become of it, unless THEY are out to get YOU. Then it will just be another line item on your indictment.

    1. Re:Just because you can do it... by HappySmileMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Being able to do it doesn't make it legal, but the "Fair Use" clauses in copyright say he's allowed to make a copy for personal use, ripping it without the DRM is fine, he should give the reason "DRM means I can't watch it with the video player I currently have installed." if asked, although technically he doesn't even need to say WHY he did it, just that it was only for his use.

  50. and it's cheap, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only £29.99
    what a bargain

  51. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by nine-times · · Score: 1

    I'm just not sure I see the point of this. It's a 2GB key, which means it's not going to be better quality than DVD. As cheap as these USB keys are getting to be, it's still more expensive than a DVD.

    I can see the value of wanting a movie on a USB key, I suppose, but in that case I'd probably rather buy the DVD and the USB key, rip the DVD to a normal format, and drop that on the key. At least that way I can back it up, or use the key for another purpose without losing the movie.

    Seems like a solution in search of a problem.

  52. Battlefield: Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Was written by the same whack job who created Scientology. Go figure.

    http://www.whyaretheydead.net/

  53. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    I bet it installs a horrible outsource written driver right after you plug it.

    If they are more clever, they have also "hidden" it just like Sony. There you have a brand new thing creating problems and you don't have a clue if it runs or not.

    All this happens on Vista which is said to be just almost stabilised on SP1.
     

  54. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Can't rip it, can't archive it, can't move it to my HDD without the dongle. And if the flash drive gets damaged, who you gonna call?

    DRM Buster!!

    (Disclaimer: Don't know if the site is legitimate, but at least it rhymes with the song ;-) )

  55. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if it doesn't prevent you from deleting the film and it's reasonably priced for a blank drive, maybe I'll buy one.

  56. Subnotebook by tepples · · Score: 1

    Can't put it on a portable media player, either.

    Can't put it on a dedicated portable media player, but you can probably put it on a mini-laptop such as the Acer Aspire One that my cousin is thinking of buying.

    1. Re:Subnotebook by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      However, assuming this was done for a lot of movies, you'd have to plug in a new dongle every time you wanted to watch a movie. So, let's compare this with iTunes where you download the file. With iTunes, you download 50 movies to your laptop, and then when you leave the house, you can just bring your laptop, and you have all your movies. With this model, if you want to bring all your movies with you, you also have to bring along 50 USB Keys. What's the point of copying it to your hard disk if you still have to have the thing plugged in to play the movie. You're just eating up hard drive space for no advantage.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:Subnotebook by tepples · · Score: 1

      if you want to bring all your movies with you, you also have to bring along 50 USB Keys.

      What situation were you thinking of where someone would be away from one's home long enough to watch 75 to 100 hours of feature films?

  57. Production cost differences? by Rastl · · Score: 1

    Are they looking for a new distribution medium so movies don't cost as much to produce for retail sale? If that's the case then maybe this isn't such a terrible idea. Any type of DRM is already obsolete so we can remove that from the equation.

    The sheep will use the dongle and be happy. Everyone else will crack and rip the movie to a different storage medium. Heck, I can even see moving it back to a thumb drive if the speed is there to watch it smoothly.

    Now I'm no hardware person. I'll be the first to admit that. But doesn't reading from USB take less power and generate less heat than reading from an optical drive? And fewer moving parts means fewer chances for something to break.

    The price is laughable if they're trying for proof of concept. This kind of thing smacks of the "Release something people really don't want for an outrageous price then scrap the idea because no one is buying it" type of thinking that has permeated the media industry for far too long. I can't even hope for anything different any more.

    1. Re:Production cost differences? by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      > Are they looking for a new distribution medium so movies
      > don't cost as much to produce for retail sale?

      Even if so, you don't think they're gonna lower the retail price, do you?

  58. This is GREAT!!! (Blade Runner) by starglider29a · · Score: 1
    You have NO IDEA how many times I've said "Have you seen Blade Runner?" And the person asked is younger than most versions of the movie.

    AND HOW MANY TIMES I wanted to grab my keychain and show them the scene I was alluding to, in the version I was alluding to.

    And being on USB, I can carry each version on my keychain. I hope they are thoughtful enough to color code them.
    1. Purple: Original
    2. Orange: Director's Cut
    3. Green: Final Cut
    4. Blue: MYCut after I get my Quad Core Mac and Final Cut.

    WITH VOICEOVER, Bitches!

    1. Re:This is GREAT!!! (Blade Runner) by oberondarksoul · · Score: 1

      What's preventing you from doing this now? If you own the DVD, just rip the film, encode it to taste, and pop it onto a regular USB drive. Quicker, cheaper, and you don't need to worry about whether or not they've included the version you prefer.

      --
      And tomorrow the stock exchange will be the human race
  59. Good promotional idea by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    This is an excellent promotional idea for selling USB drives, but not movies: you are already buying the hardware dongle, might as well get the movie with it :)

    On the other hand, I could envision "Movie ROMs" being pulled off if marketed properly. They would have to sell very cheap hi-def "movie dongle" players that hooked up to your TV. I'd buy such a device if it also played regular video files.

    Such a scheme would not deter the hard-core hackers, but I could see people buying into the idea of "owning" a movie on a USB dongle that was difficult to copy and more durable/compact that a DVD.

  60. Analog hole fails with games by tepples · · Score: 1

    Sure there is always the analog loophole.

    Not necessarily. Yes, the analog hole works with movies like Ghostbusters, but it fails with video games like Ghostbusters .

  61. If every file on my hard drive... by dpbsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...required me to keep possession of a USB-key-sized physical object in order to maintain access to it, then I calculate that I would need to keep about two thousand pounds of USB keys, which would be enough to fill approximately twenty desk drawers.

    I guess it's not impossible on the face of it.

    I could store them in shallow drawers, vertically, alphabetical order, with little P-touch labels on the end of each one.

    1. Re:If every file on my hard drive... by ProfessionalCookie · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd need some sort of . . . filesystem.

    2. Re:If every file on my hard drive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing every file on your hard drive isn't a feature film or even something you would look at directly for any particular reason. Hell, I'd bet that you actively look at less than 1% of the total files (by count) on your system unless you happen to be a photographer or video editor (which tend to do just as you mentioned frequently anyways).

      I don't get your distress at a movie on a thumb drive concept or why it would force you to do anything like storing individual files on thumb drives or suggest that as something anyone is even considering in the future.

      Storing 3Kb library files on individual thumb drives? I don't think so... for obvious reasons. Storing 2-4Gb movie images on thumb drives? Not entirely preposterous (DRM aside).

      That's like saying that if I had a grain of sand for every bit of data on my hard drive I would have a sandbox full of sand. Entirely useless as a comparative metric since it's irrelevant.

  62. Ohh wow by meist3r · · Score: 1

    And we've been criticizing the movie industry for their outdated business models and lack of innovation. Now they have discovered USB thumb drives? Will someone please tell them that they can stop selling VHS?

    Does anyone besides me see that this is just another ridiculous attempt to bind media to a physical medium in order to control customer ability to enjoy content?

    Well I'll store all my torrent files on external hard drives from now on... maybe they'll release one of those with a keycard soon.

    Sheesh.

  63. One possible application by drhank1980 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Porn, this kind of DRM would actually be great for Porn. Nobody else can watch unless they have your USB drive. Other than that it seems pretty lame.

  64. Pre loaded? by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    So, it's not just LOADED on the stick, it's PRE loaded! What will they think of next? These men of science.

    And thank goodness we don't have to buy used cars anymore. Used cars suck. Give me a pre owned car. It's like new, but cheaper, right?

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  65. Little Brother by sm62704 · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is insanity. I can download a copy of that stupid movie without Dumb Restrictions on Media from TPB, or I can just watch the tape I already paid for over ten years ago. Now, I'd buy the key with the movie pre-loaded, but to pay good money for crippleware when I can get a perfectly useable copy for free is just brain-dead stupid.

    DRM doesn't affact copyright infringers whatsoever. It only inconvieniences paying customers. The only rational explanation for the MAFIAA's insanity is drugs - cocaine. It must be all the coke they're snorting/smoking/shooting that makes them behave like a bunch of thieving, distrusting, irrational crack whores.

    I just started reading Cory Doctorow's Little Brother (HTML version linked; there are other formats here), and its preface has something to say about the insanity that is DRM (I've abbreviated it a bit):

    I recently saw Neil Gaiman give a talk at which someone asked him how he felt about piracy of his books. He said, "Hands up in the audience if you discovered your favorite writer for free -- because someone loaned you a copy, or because someone gave it to you? Now, hands up if you found your favorite writer by walking into a store and plunking down cash." Overwhelmingly, the audience said that they'd discovered their favorite writers for free, on a loan or as a gift. When it comes to my favorite writers, there's no boundaries: I'll buy every book they publish, just to own it (sometimes I buy two or three, to give away to friends who must read those books). I pay to see them live. I buy t-shirts with their book-covers on them. I'm a customer for life.

    People who study the habits of music-buyers have discovered something curious: the biggest pirates are also the biggest spenders. If you pirate music all night long, chances are you're one of the few people left who also goes to the record store (remember those?) during the day. You probably go to concerts on the weekend, and you probably check music out of the library too. If you're a member of the red-hot music-fan tribe, you do lots of everything that has to do with music, from singing in the shower to paying for black-market vinyl bootlegs of rare Eastern European covers of your favorite death-metal band.

    Same with books. I've worked in new bookstores, used bookstores and libraries. I've hung out in pirate ebook ("bookwarez") places online. I'm a stone used bookstore junkie, and I go to book fairs for fun. And you know what? It's the same people at all those places: book fans who do lots of everything that has to do with books.

    If I could loan out my physical books without giving up possession of them, I would. The fact that I can do so with digital files is not a bug, it's a feature, and a damned fine one. It's embarrassing to see all these writers and musicians and artists bemoaning the fact that art just got this wicked new feature: the ability to be shared without losing access to it in the first place. It's like watching restaurant owners crying down their shirts about the new free lunch machine that's feeding the world's starving people because it'll force them to reconsider their business-models. Yes, that's gonna be tricky, but let's not lose sight of the main attraction: free lunches!

    Universal access to human knowledge is in our grasp, for the first time in the history of the world. This is not a bad thing.

    For me -- for pretty much every writer -- the big problem isn't piracy, it's obscurity (thanks to Tim O'Reilly for this great aphorism). Of all the people who failed to buy this book today, the majority did so because they never heard of it, not because someone gave them a free copy. Mega-hit best-sellers in science fiction sell half a million copies -- in a world where 175,000 attend the San Diego Comic Con alone, you've got to figure that most of the people who "like science fiction" (and related geeky stuff li

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    1. Re:Little Brother by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      I dunno about you, but I got rid of copy protected floppies back in the day by putting duct tape over the little hole.

      I'll buy DRM'd crap when it provided DRM'd media surpassing the easily accessible free media, such as BluRay. Encrypted media requiring essentially proprietary hardware to read, ya, I'll call that DRM.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:Little Brother by evilviper · · Score: 1

      but to pay good money for crippleware when I can get a perfectly useable copy for free is just brain-dead stupid.

      Welcome to the strange parallel world of TV episodes on iTunes/Netflix...

      Yes, that radio signal being broadcast over your head right now... you get to PAY for a lower quality version, that you are forced to watch within 24 hours or lose the right... Meanwhile, a $30 TV tuner allows you to capture it without any restrictions, and at full quality.

      And it's all the more insane when it's something 20+ years old, where everyone that cares already owns at least one copy, if not more. The idea that everyone is going to go out and pirate old TV shows or movies just because they have a DRM-free copy is just insane.

      The RIAA is just starting to figure it out where music is concerned, but really only because they're tired of being bullied by Apple, and DRM-free is the only way you can sell music playable on the iPod without paying Apple and agreeing to their terms. Perhaps we'll see the same thing happen with TV and (older) movies in the near future if the iPod and iPhone becomes an remotely as popular for video as it is for music.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Little Brother by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Um.
      Putting the duct tape over the little hole makes the floppy *WRITABLE*.

      Copy-protected floppies are ones that used unusual formatting tricks (partition's just a *BIT* too large... bad sectors that screw with XCOPY... etc, etc) to prevent *READING* the floppy and *WRITING* it to another one.

    4. Re:Little Brother by ion.simon.c · · Score: 1

      Sooo tacky to self-post...
      I forgot something else that duct tape can do!
      It can change a high-density disk to a low-density one. Oops.
      Please forgive me. :<

    5. Re:Little Brother by dissy · · Score: 1

      Yes, that radio signal being broadcast over your head right now...

      Just a nitpick, but, the radio signal being broadcast over, under, to the sides of, and straight through your head right now... photons that pass through your body 24/7. That is what they are saying is illegal to copy down and translate.

      Laughable.

      I only hope the copyright laws get fixed before the first commercial death-ray-who-the-victim-has-to-pay-you-after-they-are-dead gets invented.

    6. Re:Little Brother by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Just a nitpick, but, the radio signal being broadcast over, under, to the sides of, and straight through your head right now...

      Depends where you are... Here on the fringes, the strength of TV signals is very, very weak at ground level, while it's acceptable at, say, 20' up. Of course there is some signal at ground level, but not sufficiently distinct from background noise.

      Of course, if you're in a stronger signal area, then the signal is, of course, very strong, everywhere.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  66. Zoltar FTW! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If you want a medium I hear Zoltar is really cheap and he can pop out a card that will shrink you and your willie for a quarter.

    1. Re:Zoltar FTW! by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Wow. I never thought the movie "Big" would be referenced on /. of all places...

  67. How does a movie fit by treeves · · Score: 1

    on a 2 GB flash drive? DVDs are 4.7GB, so is this thing compressed a lot or low resolution or what?

    --
    ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    1. Re:How does a movie fit by edraven · · Score: 1

      A single film doesn't use up an entire DVDs 4.7G capacity. Most DVD video is encoded at around 9.8M/s. That's something of a simplification, of course, but do the math and you'll see a feature-length film would easily fit in 2G.

    2. Re:How does a movie fit by treeves · · Score: 1

      Well, when I look at the contents of most DVDs, they seem to use most of the 4.7GB, though that includes some special features besides the main movie, which I would have guessed (maybe incorrectly) took up only a small part of the total.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:How does a movie fit by edraven · · Score: 1

      I'm at work at the moment (shh, don't tell), but when I get home I'll take a look at the GhostBusters DVD I have and see how big the actual VOB files are.

    4. Re:How does a movie fit by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Informative

      9.8Mb/s for 105 minutes gives 6.45GBs. I didn't 'do the math,' I was lazy and got Google to do it for me. I didn't really need to though, because I've actually looked at DVDs in the past, and know that most of them are DVD-9, which stores around 8GB of data, and few have more than about 1GB of special features. Almost all commercial DVDs are double-layered, because making the movie more than 4.7GB made it harder to copy before dual-layer DVD burners became common (very recent). Quite a few longer films come split between two dual-layer DVDs (e.g. Lawrence of Arabia), because you can't fit the whole thing on one without dropping the quality a lot.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:How does a movie fit by edraven · · Score: 1

      I must've made an error the first time I worked that out. That'll teach me to be lazy next time and let Google do it for me. Thanks. :)

    6. Re:How does a movie fit by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Of course, these numbers are assuming MPEG-2. If you're using something modern, like H.264, getting a standard definition movie into 2GB is a lot easier. DVD's can't do this, because most players don't have enough general-purpose CPU power to decode H.264, and don't have special-purpose chips for it, and studios can't expect everyone to upgrade their player just because a new CODEC exists. USB keys don't have this issue.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  68. Protected Media Path by tepples · · Score: 1

    If nothing else, write your own video and audio drivers that "displays" the movie to a file.

    Windows Media Digital Restrictions Management allows a file to require use of the Protected Media Path in Windows Vista or the predecessor protocol in Windows XP, which rejects drivers that lack a WHQL digital signature. You'd have to use the actual analog hole, which might involve a camcorder and, like other methods based on output capture, would definitely not work for the video game adaptation of the movie.

  69. What? by Snaller · · Score: 1

    "which looks set to be a part of the next revision of the DVD standard. "

    Are you saying DVD isn't on the way out?

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:What? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I'm saying there's an upcoming revision of the DVD standard.

      DVD is neither on the way out nor futureproof at this point in time. Over-all, sales of disc-based media is falling, and this is whether you just count DVD, or count DVD+Blu-ray+{Miscellaneous also-rans}, but it's not falling so fast that you can safely say the format is dying, it's within the tolerances you should expect for sales during a time of dismal releases and a faltering economy.

      The BDA have really screwed up with Blu-ray. It gives you a higher quality picture - but that, obviously, is only going to be visible for people with fairly expensive TVs. It gives you marginally better sound - though most people will not be able to tell the difference between a well-mastered FR DTS 5.1 track and a lossless TrueHD track. And, er, that's it. It doesn't really give you anything else, and if you buy a Blu-ray disc you'll have to replace all the DVD players you have with Blu-ray players to achieve the same utility.

      So the DVD Forum is going to bung a bunch of HD DVD technologies into DVD and is calling it DVD 2.0. The working group doing this is WG12. You can expect, at minimum, backwards compatibility for pressed media (the main feature being 480{p/i}/576{p/i} MPEG2, accessible on red-laser layers to regular plain-old DVD players), the ability to download and burn CPRM controlled discs, some kind of additional help for upscalers, the Advanced Content system (HDi) that seamlessly integrates online and offline content, and Mandatory Managed Copy - so you'll be able to copy all your movies to a hard disk to play on demand, or copy them to a portable player without having to carry discs around.

      Whether it will be a success or not is, at this stage, difficult to tell. What the DVD Forum was aiming at with HD DVD, and appears to be still aiming at with DVD 2.0, was making the format "future proof" by making it seamlessly integrate and be part of a future infrastructure based primarily upon downloaded content rather than physical discs. Right now there's no standard for online downloads, and a number of companies - Amazon, Netflix, Apple, Microsoft, Sony - are acting as "gatekeepers" for proprietary systems. Pretty much the entire industry understands that online is the future, but I doubt anyone actually wants the proprietary gatekeeper environment to exist forever.

      So on the one hand, the studios would probably prefer an open standard be introduced, and they'd be receptive to an independent organization like the DVD Forum setting standards especially if it offers a seamless upgrade path from what we have today, and doesn't cut off people who don't have Internet connections capable of supporting online downloads.

      On the other hand, you only have to look at the insane HD DVD vs Blu-ray war to see there are some vicious politics involved, politics that the DVD Forum seems to be bad at playing. Sony has lost $3B on Blu-ray already, and is unlikely to be overly keen on a technology path that brings forward its complete obsolescence as a movie distribution technology. Certain companies, notably Fox, picked Blu-ray over HD DVD due to extreme conservatism on their part, seeing "Supposedly far more secure, more of the same" as superior to "Slightly more secure, far more capabilities and futureproofing". Online, while inevitable, is also scary to these companies.

      My gut tells me that "DVD 2.0" may well fail because of the politics involved, but something will emerge from the ruins of both DVD 2.0 and Blu-ray that could well succeed. I think it's all a crying shame though. Had HD DVD succeeded, we might have been on a path towards standardized online downloads already, with stores migrating to the HD DVD system now it had been standardized and with manufacturers starting to build players, burners, and media in earnest. Right now the only possible hope is that the studios come to their senses, otherwise we're going to be stuck with half a dozen incompatible proprietary download systems and a media format that's just not plain worth spending thousands on especially given we all know it'll be obsolete within three-to-five years.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:What? by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Wow, thanks for typing that.

      I haven't much fancied buying some other player, like blue ray so far, I see that i might not have missed much.

      These commercial games are odd indeed. I wonder what Google would bet on *g*

      I'm afraid i don't know the laser difference, but are you saying those DVD2 disks would also work in an old player or would you still need to get a new one?

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    3. Re:What? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Yep. Store-bought/pressed DVDs that follow the DVD2.0 standard would play in existing players (but wouldn't have the advanced features, obviously.) Disks downloaded over the Internet would probably require DVD2.0 players though.

      What would be nice is if the Blu-ray Disc Association and DVD Forum actually agreed to work together on this rather than making it another war. It would be a clean way for Blu-ray discs and players to avoid obsolescence, which I think is inevitable within three to five years if they don't make the format integrate cleanly into a future that's very obviously going to be online. It would also avoid a format war that doesn't need to be a format war. The whole HD DVD vs Blu-ray thing was unnecessary too, there was little reason the HD DVD people couldn't have adopted the physical Blu-ray disc format, or the Blu-ray people the higher level format of HD DVD, other than "NIH" attitudes. I'm sure one side doing that would have won the other side over.

      This might be a second opportunity, or they could continue just being nasty to each other, leaving us as the losers.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  70. Yeah right. by Snaller · · Score: 1

    "This is Piratebay, we're not in at the moment but at the tone you can leave your threats of lawsuits. Beware; everything you say is going to be seeded."

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Yeah right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      1: Find dead torrent of movie you want.
      2: Send an email to thepiratebay.org, claiming to be the copyright holder and requesting immediate takedown.
      3: Start your bittorrent client.
      4: ????
      5: PROFIT!!!

  71. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by k1e0x · · Score: 1

    I can't see that there is any way they can release something that is just *impossible* to copy. If you can read it, you can copy it.

    --
    Bringing liberty to the masses. - http://freetalklive.com/
  72. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by HappySmileMan · · Score: 1

    The drive works with all OSes, the film only with Windows most likely.

    Much like when Argos says that a webcam/software set works with Linux, when actually only the webcam does.
    Although that's not usually a problem, sicne I don't expect the software to work, and the software is just something you get with the webcam, not the product itself, but this could be considered kinda deceitful

  73. Even older by Fishbulb · · Score: 1

    Hell, these are just dongles! I haven't seen one of those since the '80s. They worked about as well, then, too (not so much).

  74. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Oh, sorry, Mr. Lewis. With apologies to Ray Parker, Jr., and Huey Lewis.

  75. Somebody will crack it. by EvilIntelligence · · Score: 1

    I give it a week, and somebody will crack this silly DRM. Probably with some "virtual USB drive", or something else that simply strips the DRM-ness right out of the file. They can't stop it. They can't see it. They don't know what it is, or where it comes from, but it hits them every day. It's called freedom.

    1. Re:Somebody will crack it. by DaMattster · · Score: 1

      Don't even need to crack it. Just use tunebite! Tunebite removes DRM without cracking it.

  76. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Nossie · · Score: 1

    point is you never bought the product... you only licensed it...

    How long is the license? as long as the media lasts?

    They either sold you it... or leased it..

    NOT BOTH!

    Which is why I've not bought media since napster died.

    If you want to buy your albums again and again and again just because they think that they can gouge money out a new format - that is your problem, not mine.

  77. BTW, the 90's called.... by Kleen13 · · Score: 4, Funny

    The want they hardware keys back!

    --
    That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
  78. Or you can Stream It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obviously they are using this to test the market because you can get it "freely" at official places. If you don't mind a few ads then just stream it off of Hulu:

    http://www.hulu.com/watch/25534/ghostbusters

  79. Bigger Picture by totallydude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's not about the particular film or about the DRM or even about the PNY. It's about a means for distribution. I saw an advertisement about a year ago for a company in Ireland that was working with IBM on a similar technology that allowed for fast USB sticks to have a movie downloaded from a Kiosk to a flash drive. You buy a memory stick (not sure if it was a proprietary one) and their set top box. You pick out your movie on the kiosk, insert the USB stick and it downloads while you wait. They were trying for a thirty second transfer time but I think it was taking more like three minutes which can be an eternity with the kids in tow. Regardless think of the possibilities. They could put them anywhere and you would never have to go back to return the movie. And they could create an internet Kiosk across your home connection. Why do you think Comcast is going to throttle their bandwidth... too much video.

  80. We all make our choices. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

    DRM, in this case, is a choice between DRM'd content and no content at all. I'd rather have DRM'd content than none.

    I, on the other hand, would rather do with none than with DRM.

    I made that choice when the DVDs supplanted videotape and didn't buy DVD movies - or buy or rent any movies at all - until after CSS was cracked and the movie industry gave up on their attempts to stuff that genie back into the bottle. No blu-ray players for me, either. Stopped buying CDs, too, when they started experimenting with the early computer-speaker-blowing "copy protection" that corrupted the data and depended on the error correction on players to recover the music (and thus corrupted it when you got real errors from a dirty disk) and never really got back into purchasing new music after that.

    Never actually MADE a backup copy. And never downloaded a "pirated" song or movie, either. I just don't buy encumbered stuff.

    Instead I found other ways to amuse myself. (For instance: The amazing number and variety of animals outside the place on the high desert put on a continuous show that's quite entertaining - especially when I flush the well and create a puddle that draws them in from miles around. And there's lots of amusement on the net that is not "pirated" copyrighted content.)

    Interestingly, I don't really miss the corporate "content". Either the quality took a nosedive around that time or the product stopped matching my (quite broad) tastes. (Though from what I hear of some local bands it's more the former than the latter.)

    We all make our choices.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  81. Seems like a good medium by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1
    Fast random access, smaller form factor and much much less total materials; though is the stuff in it worse for the environment than the extra material in a DVD case, anyone know? Also your media is safer as there isn't any moving parts/it doesn't come out of the case.

    I could see this being a cool idea for a rental machine you pick a movie it copies it to a blank thumbdrive and registers the thumbdrives code to a central server. You can then play it on an internet enabled computer/media centre. No more guessing required to figure out how many copies of a movie to keep. This would especially make sense once USB3 is common, they could fire movies on to the thing in a few seconds and as the resolution of movies goes up they'll probably be a larger capacity thumbdrive available that they can use.

  82. And as a second-order result. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Whether this is good or bad depends on your point of view to a certain extent, but what is clear is that Hollywood isn't planning on abandoning DRM any time soon. As a result, they're not going to adopt any form of writable media to store digital copies unless it has some kind of DRM system built-in.

    And as a second-order result of that they're going to miss the fast nickels while chasing the slow dimes.

    But private enterprise is all about being free to make stupid business decisions and taking the resulting consequences on the bottom line. (And losing the fast nickels is NOT one of the consequences they'll be able to lobby their way out of.)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:And as a second-order result. by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      And as a second-order result of that they're going to miss the fast nickels while chasing the slow dimes.

      Bingo!

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  83. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    It's a 2GB key, which means it's not going to be better quality than DVD.

    Only if you are keeping it in MP2 format. There have been many advances in video encodings/compression since the early 1990s

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
  84. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they will just tattoo the key on your forehead or right hand,

  85. Porn and SD by killmenow · · Score: 1

    Two comments:

    1. I've often wondered if porn were purchasable this way. Not that I want to buy it...but I see a market if such a product doesn't already exist for something along the linse of this: you buy this USB key with X application on it (some modified portable version of [insert OSS app here]) that would appear as a legitimate application, and work as advertised, but have a hidden mode that is activated via some super secret hot-key combination plus password the user sets to launch the hidden porn stash/viewer and another quick hot-key to go back to normal mode. The idea is for the man on the go who wants an easy way to hide his porn stash in plain sight.

    2. Since SD-RAM cards are so cheap now, and almost every device I have supports them, I've been considering transcoding my DVDs to MPEG4 files onto 1GB SD cards. Before I go spending all that time doing it though...Anybody think this is ill-advised?

    1. Re:Porn and SD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. TrueCrypt.

  86. Or watch it online... by Facegarden · · Score: 1

    Hulu has Ghostbusters 1 and 2 freely and legally available to watch online. You have to deal with commercials, but meh, it didn't bother me, i watched it last week!
    -Taylor

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
  87. Beats DVDs by realmolo · · Score: 1

    Seriously. As thumbdrives get cheaper and cheaper, this makes sense. DVDs (and Blu-Ray discs) are just too fragile A USB drive is durable as hell. Plus, and most importantly, USB ports are *dirt cheap* and *small*. Imagine how many USB ports you could have on your "USB Movie Player" device. 20? That would mean 20 movies available instantly, all the time. Hell, screw movie players- imagine having console that used nothing but high-capacity USB drives! You could keep all your games plugged in all the time, and the load times would be fantastic.

    Is that as good as downloading movies? No. But let's fact it, we just don't have the bandwidth in this country to support millions of people downloading HD content all the time.

    1. Re:Beats DVDs by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Yup! Really a coincidence though: Only yesterday i was watching Tremors (the first one) on an USB stick on my Mac. The Mac was running on battery, and a DVD would suck it down. A USB copy though was lot easier on battery.
      As more people start watching movies on PC's and Macs, it makes sense to release it on a medium that's easier and portable. Hell, i could carry about a dozen USB sticks (write protected), when i go on trips.
      DivX is the ideal format for its small size and insane quality (HD).
      I hope the studios take notice and move out of the DVD and BluRay corset.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Beats DVDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, i could carry about a dozen USB sticks (write protected), when i go on trips.

      Wow! You Mac users really don't know diddly-squat about operating systems, do you? Because if you did, you'd know about carrying *just one big* USB key on which you can carry *lots* of media.

      And you can make these things called *directories* on both your hard disks and USB keys to logically segregate your media if you want.

      I may only be a mortal PC user but an 8GB USB key holds more than enough movies for even the longest plane flight and the chances are that at some point in my travels, I'll be able to find a thing called a *power socket* which not only allows me to recharge my laptop battery but also gives me more than enough power to replace an movies on my USB key that I have *watched* with those that are already on my hard disk.

      Hey, Einstein, you might also want to take this on one of your trips also - for a little *heavy* reading.

    3. Re:Beats DVDs by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Oh...my. Sorry. I just dumbed it down because am posting on Slashdot, and i don't which AC would come and bite me back in my ass if i use a modicum of techno-language.
      Anywho, we Mac users don't really worry about directories (Folders in our parlance), we have Spotlight, so i can throw my junk anywhere on my disk[s] and either create a Virtual Folder or use spotlight to pinpoint it.
      Plus, a USB drive uses less battery power than a spinning CD drive. Point in case for you mortal PC user: Your Dell/HP has less "staying" power on batteries than a Mac does. Mine goes 6-8 hours easily.
      Tell me which airlines you fly in Coach class which provides you power sockets, and i will tell you how to call DHS when you rush to the airplane's toilet to recharge your laptop. Other passengers might *wonder* why you want to rush to a toilet with your laptop unless...
      You get the idea.
      So, for us Mac users longevity, stamina and strength is a given. For you *PC* users you have none of them, which is why you need to rush to toilets and elsewhere...
      And thanks for the book suggestion: Although it would be more useful to you than me: I use a Mac which comes with a *real* printed manual rather than a PDF joke.
      Ta ta

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  88. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by tknd · · Score: 1

    I feel like this is more of a "proof of concept" that flash memory as a media can replace something like DVD or BluRay. In other words it is just an attempt by PNY to diversify their product into a new market for hopefully increased revenue.

    My opinion is it is still overrated since the internet is quickly proving that you don't even need a media to play a movie. You can just stay connected to the internet and download or stream the video on demand. Just like how MP3s, itunes, and such are quickly making the Audio CD go extinct, I think the same will inevitably happen to movies.

  89. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With apologies to Huey Lewis and the News:

    There, fixed that for ya. ;)

  90. Install ? by M1000 · · Score: 1

    I wonder what kind of crap this will install on computers.... remember Sony ?

    1. Re:Install ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sony owns the movie rights, so I would not be surprised if they put something nasty on there.

  91. Use the floppy drive by Krneki · · Score: 1

    I mean in the past copy protection forcing you to use the floppy was so successful, why dump this magnificent copy protection and go for the USB? /sarcasm off

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  92. Boooo by MrSparkle · · Score: 1

    By reading the title I was ready to buy it because it sounded like such a cool idea and I wanted to own a piece of history. Then I read the part about the DRM. Nuts to that! Why do companies keep repeating the same mistakes everytime? After being burned by some software that used DRM and then they went belly up; I will not by anything with DRM, ever, period!

  93. Or it could be for the opposite effect... by finnw · · Score: 1
    1. Ghostbusters gets re-released on USB stick. As this movie happens to be the first such release, it gets mentioned in the news.
    2. 1,000,000 People who haven't watched the movie for years are reminded of it and decide they'd like to see it again
    3. 250,000 of those people realise that while they do still have a copy, it's on VHS and they haven't replaced that VHS player that broke down 3 years ago. And it was quite faded anyway. A DVD would be better so...
    4. 100,000 of those spot a DVD in a bargain bin the following week
    5. 10,000 of them actually watch it, instead just leaving it on the shelf with their other 200 unwrapped bargain bin DVDs
    6. 50 rip the DVD using handbrake, out of habit, or just to avoid the 2 minutes of FBI warnings & pointless animations
    7. 1 shares the ripped version on PirateBay/BearShare/whatever

    a week later in a meeting somewhere...

    Engineer #1: This DRM scheme has obviously failed. There's a version of Ghostbusters on PirateBay now.
    Engineer #2: But of course there is, there has been for years. It's probably from the original DVD release.
    Engineer #1: No, this one is new. And it's in the top 100 downloads list. It must have happened recently, and the only recent release is this USB dongle here
    CEO: Well scrap this scheme then, it's causing piracy already

    --
    Is Betteridge's Law of Headlines Correct?
  94. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by Marillion · · Score: 1

    The article cites the price of the USB key is £30 - which is close to $60.00US.

    Even if 20% of the price covered the value of the USB key (generous, I think) that leaves £24 ($48US) for the movie. This is ridiculously overpriced.

    --
    This is a boring sig
  95. Another dongle to lose by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    Great. Now I can imagine digging through my junk drawer looking for a USB drive with "The Dirty Dozen" on it. It's just something else that will end up going through the laundry.

    Apart from the geek factor, this is probably one of the dumbest ideas for movie distribution since animations made by flipping large stone tablets. Give us movies via download or stream. No more tapes to warp, disks to scratch, or dongles to lose.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  96. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by FauxPasIII · · Score: 1

    > And if the flash drive gets damaged, who you gonna call?

    HE-MAN !

    --
    25% Funny, 25% Insightful, 25% Informative, 25% Troll
  97. meh by Ignis+Flatus · · Score: 1

    nobody cares. much cheaper at amazon. http://www.amazon.com/Ghostbusters/dp/B000PEX1IE

    this has great application for distributing films to be viewed by critics, or giving them out to youth as door prizes at baseball games, but beyond novelty uses it's dead in the water, i think.

  98. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by superslacker87 · · Score: 1

    Ooh, Biblical reference. Nice.

    --
    I run Ubuntu skinned to look like a Mac on a PC. Go figure.
  99. Why buy it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can watch the movie free on hulu.com.

  100. Who would buy that? by Dark_Gravity · · Score: 1

    You can get one or both of the DVDs for a lot less than half that!

    Ghostbusters

    Ghostbusters 1 & 2

  101. What would the GUI look like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, think.

    What would a GUI look like that gave you access to the options in vlc or mplayer/transcode?

    About five hundred pigging tabs.

  102. Survey Says! by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    No.

    LOLCat sez: Do not want

    They are thinking old fashioned media distribution channels. Get it through your thick skulls idiots in the music and movie industries. We want media free content. Just the data. The container doesn't matter anymore. All we want is to be able to access the content we like, anytime we want to, anywhere we have a device that can play it. If there's internal storage in that device I should be able to copy it as many times as I want across as many devices that I want. If some people use that freedom to steal, LET THEM. There are plenty of people who will still pay for it (I know I would simply to stay legit) and you'd still make more money. Oh... and lower the goddamned prices while you're at it!!!

    K-thnx
    Bai

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  103. Keeping thumb drives instead of DVDs? by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

    I've worked out that if I converted all my DVD's into thumb drives, they'd be the size of a Twinkie thirty-five feet long, weighing approximately six hundred pounds.....

  104. I watch both last weekend. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ghostbuster AND Ghostbusters II are available to watch legit on hulu.com at 480p.

    http://www.hulu.com/browse/alphabetical/movies

    The only way to keep me respecting your DRM is to make me not have to give you money or store you film.

    Also is anyone else bothered by how dumb the flash drive is. The least they could of done is made it like a ghost trap or a slimer or a proton pack or something. Something to put on my desk that says.... YAY I like Ghostbusters as well. Notice my $20 piece of techno garbage.

  105. Flash isn't just for the Internet. by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    "The music industry has been playing around with USB flash drives for a few years now, but it hasn't been a massive success yet; will USB movies fare any better?"

    I don't see any reason it shouldn't Cost aside people put a form of "dongle" in their DVD player all the time. Plus if all the anecdotal slashposts are to be believed? USB drives are more durable than plastic disks. And one has the same advantage in that one can loan it out to others. Now those who believe in "information wants to be free" might have a problem? But then that's an impossible bunch to please.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  106. How does DivX fit by Ostracus · · Score: 1

    If memory serves, movies are MPEG2? Encoding them MPEG4 (DivX) might make it possible to fit it onto a stick.

    --
    Shai Schticks:"You don't make peace with friends, you make peace with enemies"
  107. Who did PNY call? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GHOST BUSTERS!

  108. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by m50d · · Score: 1

    I use an ASUS A730W as my portable media player - it wasn't noticably more expensive, and occasionally the ability to browse the web or IRC from it comes in handy. If these USB key movies become popular, there's no reason people couldn't use similar devices to play them portably.

    --
    I am trolling
  109. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by johncadengo · · Score: 1

    Can't rip it, can't archive it, can't move it to my HDD without the dongle. And if the flash drive gets damaged, who you gonna call?

    The pirate bay.

    You can find it by legal means: http://www.hulu.com/watch/25534/ghostbusters

    Full length streaming movie. There are occasional ads, but they are neither long nor annoying.

    --
    My page.
  110. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by nine-times · · Score: 1

    Great, so what, you're going to have some highly compressed HD movie into 2GB? Compression has gotten better, but it's not magic.

    Retail, a 2GB usb key costs at least something like $10, while a DVD that holds twice as much is closer to 20 cents when purchased in any volume. You can even get a bluray disk for about $10, and that will hold more than 10x as much as the USB key. So what kind of sense does it make as a distribution medium?

  111. Chinese copy by hack++slash · · Score: 1

    Can someone tell me what happens after Bill Murry says "Okay, I have a plan. I know exactly what to do. Now stay close, stay close. I know. Do exactly as I say. Ready, ready, get her!"? this cheap Chinese import Ghostbusters USB stick turned out to be a fake 2gb, it's only a 128mb stick.

    --
    To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
  112. Piracy experiment by rtechie · · Score: 1

    Two points

    1) The Ghostbusters video game, based on the original movie, is set to be released October 31. So this may be part of that hype.

    2) This is likely a piracy experiment. They've embedded a watermark in the copy of Ghostbusters on the key, which they've protected with over-the-top DRM. The DRM is eventually cracked, and the watermarked copy of Ghostbusters is uploaded to P2P web sites, which the vendor then tracks. Basically, I think they're trying to measure the "spread" of piracy here.

  113. GB on Hulu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dudes, Ghostbusters (and Ghostbusters II for that matter) is free over on Hulu. Watch it when ever you want. Let the ads play, so Hulu can add more content.

  114. Re:Who you gonna call? by JaBob · · Score: 1

    Ghostbusters

  115. Close your eyes and think of nothing! by ZarathustraDK · · Score: 1

    I tried that, but then a giant Ballmer came marching down the boulevard with a massive chair in his hand, and started smashing buildings.

    --
    If you quote this signature there'll be 72 copies of Windows ME waiting for you in Heaven.
  116. For the future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want a 1080P quality movie you have to wait a week or more for the HUGE (8GB or more) file to download IF there's even a torrent for it.

    Or you can by a 400 dollar bluray player and a 40 dollar bluray movie.

    If it's on a standard 8 gb flash drive you can play it off your xbox or laptop and get 1080P quality without paying 400 bones for a piece-o-crap Sony technology.

    So if their new flash-drive movies are SD then screw that. BUT if they're full HD then I'd like to see more of that

  117. Are you looking beyond the clamshell packaging? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can tell who the pioneers are. They're the ones with arrows in their backs.

    *This* particular product won't sell, but I'm reminded of Competition vs. Monopolistic Competition in economics. In a purely competitive model, one product (ie. one flash drive) is pretty much equivalent to another, so the purchase price is minimal. But in Monopolistic Competition, suppliers attempt to differentiate their products somewhat, and this differentiation (hopefully) allows them to charge a higher price (eg. a novelty USB drive, such as the Disney ones).

    Conversely, a USB with preloaded content has all sorts of promotional opportunities. A fashion USB preloaded with geek movie trailers? Sounds obvious to me and I don't know why this sort of thing hasn't come out sooner. Of course, this *is* Hollywood we're talking about.

  118. There is no DRM... by actionbastard · · Score: 1

    There is only Zuul!
    You have got to be kidding me! Where are the Ghostbusters quotes and obligs. You guys are really slipping.

    --
    Sig this!
  119. Wrong mod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parents rated funny, but hes fucking right. Its just another sign of the the studios not getting it. Selling an inferior product for an inflated price.

    Sales will be shit for this toy, and they will once again blame piracy instead of their own idiocy for it.

    Aside from that.

    Two gigs? what the fuck? Ive got hundreds of DVD quality movies ripped to DivX that are all in the 700 mb rage (or 1400 mb for giant two discers like LoTR) What is this things half movie half DRM?

  120. Amazon's MP3 store owns. by MsGeek · · Score: 3, Informative

    VBR lame-encoded MP3s, with not a speck of DRM! Effective by design!!! And if you drink Pepsi, Diet Pepsi, and other Pepsi products (although paradoxically not Mountain Dew, dammit) you can get FREE tunes. I've had iTunes for years and never bought anything. However, I've bought from Amazon.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
    1. Re:Amazon's MP3 store owns. by rrohbeck · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Free iTunes for ruining your health? What a great deal.

    2. Re:Amazon's MP3 store owns. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      VBR lame-encoded MP3s, with not a speck of DRM! Effective by design!!!

      Yeah, that's a start.

      I tend to seek out FLAC, these days. I'd certainly settle for 256-bit DRM-free AAC (far better quality than those MP3s), but Apple won't let me.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    3. Re:Amazon's MP3 store owns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd certainly settle for 256-bit DRM-free AAC (far better quality than those MP3s), but Apple won't let me.

      256kbps AAC from the iTunes Store is NOT "far better quality" than LAME-encoded 256kbps MP3. At this relatively high bitrate, the quality differences are indistinguishable.

      Don't let Apple's marketing bullshit (and the crappy MP3 encoder in iTunes) fool you.

  121. Camtasia Studio by aldousd666 · · Score: 1

    Screen capture software anyone? I hear they do sound lately too. Son of a gun, what next? Digital Wristwatches?

    --
    Speak for yourself.
  122. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by ardle · · Score: 1

    Maybe PNY imgine it might take the place of rentals, or something.
    Maybe they hope the tech will be built-in to digital TVs in the future to get around "man-in-middle" recording.
    I can't imagine that they ever considered that peeople would build a movie collection on USB sticks.

  123. Then the only thing that matters... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    ...is whether or not PNY's USB key with Ghostbusters loaded on it is cheaper or faster than any other USB key.

    DRM content has zero value - therefore the fact that a key has a DRM movie on it is irrelevant to any decision about buying a PNY key.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  124. write protected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they have write protected it?

    One thing I kind of liked about VHS was that if you stuck a piece of tape over the write protect tab you could record over crappy videos if you decided 10 years later that you didn't like them. I wonder if they've made the whole drive read/write or if they've made it into a read/write and read-only portion? Or perhaps some kind of switch like you get on an SD card.

    I kind of like the idea that you could one day overwrite it and load a non-DRM version :). However I can see novice users accidentally deleting the film too.

  125. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    If I buy a keyboard or a hard drive or a glass crack pipe and it breaks, I've lost the product. I find DRM whining to be nonsensical.

    Traditionally, media licenses have made a provision that you could make a single copy for backup and archival purposes. The reasoning is, since it's cheap or free to make the copy, you can easily protect your investment and there's no good reason to prohibit you from doing so. Keyboards, hard drives, and crack pipes are slightly different in that the price of a "copy" is equivalent to (probably greater than, if you have to make it yourself) the price of an "original", thus it wouldn't make sense to "copy" your device for backup or archival purposes.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  126. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    The day I apologize to Huey Lewis is the day I recognize Missouri as a state!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  127. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Errrm....but Missouri is a state.

  128. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    The point being that the provider is under absolutely no mandate to facilitate or even allow that copying. And often allowing it is not in their best interests because people like free shit and it costs you nothing to distribute the content you don't own. So I have nothing against you making backup copies, but the fact is by "backup copies" most people mean (wink wink) free shit. Ergo, we have DRM which is a necessary evil.

  129. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    The point being that the provider is under absolutely no mandate to facilitate or even allow that copying. And often allowing it is not in their best interests because people like free shit and it costs you nothing to distribute the content you don't own.

    It's also not in their best interest because if you can't make a backup and the original gets beaten up to the point where it's unusable, you'll have to buy another one. OTOH if you made a backup copy there's no need to buy another, which they see as a loss of revenue. However, copyright laws specifically state that the copyright holder has to let you make copies for your own use (fair use) or for backups. So basically, they are required to let you.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  130. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    They are not required. Fair use is a defense against copyright infringement charges. So if you make a copy and they sue you, you can say (and prove) it was fair use. They are under no obligation to facilitate (via technical means) this copying. This is why DRM is perfectly fine in terms of the law. DMCA is the problem, the pendulum has swung too far the other way. It should be perfectly legal to crack DRM or any other technical protection.

  131. Re:No thanks, I like to own media and do what I wa by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    I think we're saying the same thing. No, they aren't required to facilitate copying, but cracking DRM for the purposes of fair use or backup should be legal. Your original comment, "if it breaks tough luck", was what I was responding to; in essence, "no, because making a backup of digital data is free, unlike copying physical objects."

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.