Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot's Disagree Mail

Everyone likes to belong to something. Whether it be for fun, a sense of belonging, or a need for attention, a group gives you a feeling of solidarity. Surrounding yourself with people that share common goals and ideas can be comforting. Sometimes however, you realize that you hate the people you've surrounded yourself with. Your religion doesn't allow you to read anything that has profanity or you've subscribed to Slashdot thinking you could learn more about hockey. This week's collection is composed of people who don't want to play, read, or be associated with us anymore. Read below to find out how bad they want out. On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 ****** wrote:
"I'm relly sick of the level of discrimination that goes on here. I thought it might be different with other people who maybe didn't win everything. But its no different people won't be nice when your nice first. I try to say what others are saying and they get marked up? Not me as well? How can that be? If I'm the same how can they not act the same to me. It's like you have to be around forever before they won't say bad things about your comments. I thought it was different but they are just as BIG COCSUCKERS!!!!! Take my account and throw it away I've had enough of the newbie bigotry and FUCKING UNFAIR LIES."


Being just like everyone else is harder than you think. This next guy at least isn't concerned about being accepted. He has a clear vision of what he wants out of life. His vision is a world without profanity.

On Tue, 13 May 2008 ******* wrote:
"I try to live a good clean life by learning all I can and nurturing my body and spirit. I'm afraid that I will not be able to become part of your community as I find it sick. Sick in mind body and soul. Why your people deem it necessary to use the language that they do I can never understand. Women, children and people of faith will never be able to learn what you have to impart because of the filth you are tending in this rank garden. Please stop sending me email."


This next guy had me puzzled. I'd never had a complaint from fans of Guns-N-Roses, horror movies or unsound logging practices about the confusing "Slash" part of Slashdot.

On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 ******** wrote:
"I came here to learn about hockey and there is no hockey to be found. Your lucky that I didn't send you any money or we would have a big problem right now. If you don't want others to be confused to I suggest you think about changing your name to something that isn't obviously about hockey. I asked some coworkers and they agree, I'm not just some idiot. Come up with a name that means something."

426 comments

  1. So Many Questions About This Section by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What was it that prompted Slashdot to start posting its hate mail? Was someone clamoring for this? I see mild humor in it but I get a bigger kick out of watching people duke it out in ping pong comments than reading misdirected hate towards the editors.

    Also, what is the expected result of our discussions of this stuff? Is it to pick it apart and analyze it? Is it to provide user generated retorts that you can't due to legal reasons? I shall try a little of both.

    Is Slashdot trying to add an optional low brow element to satisfy users that have left for other sites dedicated to that? Because, you know that half of your users are going to tag this 'pleasestop' or some such negative approval tag.

    Also, why does it look different than the rest of Slashdot? Isn't it just another section? Why do you need another CSS for it? I seem to think it would be better site design to have a thorough reused theme but maybe you want the reader to know it's Idle. Who knows? Sure seems to upset a lot of people.

    --

    "I'm relly sick of the level of discrimination that goes on here."

    This level of reverence for the moderation system never ceases to amaze me. Hell, I myself can have a sour day if I'm given a thrashing on a post. This person doesn't even seem to be a regular user and they are already upset.

    A very peculiar amount of power, these mod points are. Enough for someone to call a negative moderation discrimination!

    --

    "I try to live a good clean life by learning all I can and nurturing my body and spirit."

    Despite being raised Roman Catholic for 18 years, this still baffles me. I know I'm not the first person to share this view (I think I read about it in Vonnegut's "Palm Sunday") but there is a reason I don't swear often. It's not so I can be 'clean' and 'pure' ... it's so that when I do swear, people know I'm not fucking around. Seriously, if you're dropping f-bombs left and right then where do you go when you're genuinely upset? I prefer to not raise my voice so those words are reserved for extreme moments. I feel bad for the people who incorporate them into everyday life ... how loud do you think an injured rapper would have to raise their voice before people gave them medical attention?

    --

    "I came here to learn about hockey and there is no hockey to be found. Your lucky that I didn't send you any money or we would have a big problem right now."

    Am I the only person that had the sudden urge to register hockeydot.org and have it redirect to Slashdot?

    "If you don't want others to be confused to I suggest you think about changing your name to something that isn't obviously about hockey. I asked some coworkers and they agree ..."

    Are these the same coworkers that face physical abuse or verbal ridicule if they don't agree with you?

    " ... I'm not just some idiot. Come up with a name that means something."

    Of course you're not an idiot, you're just a hockey fan. And if <insert object here> isn't bleeding with hockey (in this case the internet), you are angered with it. I understand. I'm from Minnesota where many of your kind roam around in large herds laying waste to beer and stadiums. I would suggest moving there for solace and the ability to experience all hockey all the time.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Cheeko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      can't tell if you're trolling, but this is just the weekly crossover from idle.slashdot.org.

      Its the /. topic section for totally random waste of time nonsensical sort of things. Its late on a Friday and they feel like sharing once a week some of the random, potentially humorous mail they get.

      I actually find them fairly entertaining each week.

    2. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by kermit1221 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "how loud do you think an injured rapper would have to raise their voice before people gave them medical attention? "

      Um... Who cares?

    3. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by conspirator57 · · Score: 0

      it's so /.ers can pat themselves on the back variously for:

      - the dramatic conclusions of our tendencies towards baseless vindictive behaviour

      - pushing away people with different worldviews than the internet norm

      - generally laughing at others to calm our own insecurities.

      yay us. we're so mature/bigger/badder/whatever/
      fill in the blank.

      --
      "If still these truths be held to be
      Self evident."
      -Edna St. Vincent Millay
    4. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Tekninja_Hawk · · Score: 0

      "What was it that prompted Slashdot to start posting its hate mail? Was someone clamoring for this?"

      i think this is called the ol' "slow news day"

    5. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by gone.fishing · · Score: 1

      Please, think of your fellow Minnesotans.

      Sure, we just get rid of the Republicans and now you want us to take the hockey fans back?

      All I want is a little peace and quiet. But I'm not gonna get that anyway since Monday nite there is a little football game. Those dudes are far worse than the hockey dudes even if the game is in Green Bay!

    6. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Sparton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I believe the reason that idle has been thrown up on the front page has to do with advertiser pressure (holy cow, look at those guys at Digg and stuff! They got craziness, why don't you?..). Just a hunch.

    7. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Teach · · Score: 1

      I must confess I LOVE the horizontal threshold slider and MUCH prefer it to the usual vertical one. I can't wait until the kinks are worked out and it becomes the default. But I agree the disgruntled email is probably a lot funnier for the admins than for us.

      --
      Graham "Teach" Mitchell, computer science teacher, Leander HS
    8. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they were loud rappers, I would be happy to give them some arsenic. I'd say, that they would have this attention in about 5 seconds.

    9. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by olclops · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For what it's worth, I look forward to these disagree mails. Low brow? That's one way to see it. But on another level, I find it a useful reminder, especially in a fairly-like-minded community like this, that much of the world thinks far differently than I do.

    10. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 2

      No... It's more along the lines of... They want attention all the time, that's why they swear all the time :P I agree with GP when it comes to verbally swearing (because it's more harmful to hear than to read). Whereas online, we are already desensitized by much worse things, and I tend to swear in jokes most the time. If you are offended by reading a swear word that you have little idea of the tone used, then you have problems.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    11. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by paazin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Slashdot's moderating system is total bullshit and the admins are retards for still keeping it around. Nearly every downmodding that occurs on Slashdot is 100% invalid.

      Including the -1 you just got? ;)

    12. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First you complain about the motivation behind posting these emails, and then you go on an make some fairly insightful comments one of them. Which is it going to be?

    13. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are entertaining. For awhile, I wondered about moderation and how it works here, but figured it out finally. Now, When I get modded troll or flamebait, I like to think of it as a trophy... for having offended someone enough to waste their mod point that way :)

      Seeing others get angry out of confusion or just tech illiteracy does my heart good.

      Reading their comments, you just know this is the guy at your local watering hole wearing the nascar hat backwards and having a great time with some light beer. (with some luck, I've just offended a few more people :))) {it's humor people}

      It's fun to see that /. gets its share of normal people who do not know rm -rf from a hole in their hard drive.

    14. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      I didn't even notice it was there, which is a good thing.

      That said, I'd rather they used vertical real estate on my nice widescreen monitors.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    15. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by UltraAyla · · Score: 0

      Thank you for finally posting what I consider to be valid criticism of the Idle section. Every other criticism is just general whining, but I generally agree with what you are saying and think it is constructive.

    16. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by ChrisKnight · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Am I the only person that had the sudden urge to register hockeydot.org and have it redirect to Slashdot?"

      Registered. I'll have it redirecting to this story shortly.

      -Chris

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    17. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Cheeko · · Score: 1

      Indeed all I could think was how entertaining it would be to try to explain to the hockey guy how slashdot DOES mean something and makes a lot more sense in the context of what it actually is, than it would for hockey.

    18. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidently not.

    19. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by geoskd · · Score: 1

      Despite being raised Roman Catholic for 18 years, this still baffles me. I know I'm not the first person to share this view (I think I read about it in Vonnegut's "Palm Sunday") but there is a reason I don't swear often. It's not so I can be 'clean' and 'pure' ... it's so that when I do swear, people know I'm not fucking around. Seriously, if you're dropping f-bombs left and right then where do you go when you're genuinely upset? I prefer to not raise my voice so those words are reserved for extreme moments. I feel bad for the people who incorporate them into everyday life ... how loud do you think an injured rapper would have to raise their voice before people gave them medical attention?


      As someone who uses a fairly large and diverse profanity selection in my daily utterances, I can assure you that very few people have ever had trouble distinguishing between my merely unhappy moments, and my truly torqued moments. There are probably several non-verbal cues I use to impart this to others, but in any event, they just seem to know when I'm to be avoided, and when I'm relatively safe.

      -=Geoskd

      --
      I wish I had a good sig, but all the good ones are copyrighted
    20. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by madprof · · Score: 2, Funny

      All overblown hyperbole is actually factually correct. Every single sweeping statement is entirely wrong, however.

    21. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by merreborn · · Score: 5, Funny

      "I'm relly sick of the level of discrimination that goes on here."

      This level of reverence for the moderation system never ceases to amaze me. Hell, I myself can have a sour day if I'm given a thrashing on a post. This person doesn't even seem to be a regular user and they are already upset.

      A very peculiar amount of power, these mod points are. Enough for someone to call a negative moderation discrimination!

      I actually enjoyed that email, 'cause I can understand where the kid was coming from. Until you've got positive karma, you might as well be posting directly to /dev/null most of the time. I posted for months before I got a karma bonus, and then, all the sudden, I'm getting posts modded up on a regular basis.

      I didn't find it quite as frustrating as this kid did, but that email really shows how I'm sure thousands of "outsiders" feel about slashdot. Slashdot's tendency to weed out all but the most dedicated keeps the signal-to-noise ratio extremely high, but it probably drives away many, many potential posters.

      here is a reason I don't swear often. It's not so I can be 'clean' and 'pure' ... it's so that when I do swear, people know I'm not fucking around. Seriously, if you're dropping f-bombs left and right then where do you go when you're genuinely upset? I prefer to not raise my voice so those words are reserved for extreme moments. I feel bad for the people who incorporate them into everyday life ... how loud do you think an injured rapper would have to raise their voice before people gave them medical attention?

      Seriously? You can't tell the difference between someone saying "Fucking thing sucks! We'll do it live!", and "HOLY FUCK THERE'S A HOLE IN MY ABDOMEN AND MY FUCKING SPLEEN IS ABOUT TO FALL OUT!"?

      I seriously doubt that rappers really have trouble getting medical attention whenever they need it. Really, how do you imagine that scene working out in your world? "Oh, I'm sorry Mr. DMX. When you said 'Bitch, I got shot in the knee - I need a fucking ambulance', I thought you were just experimenting with some new lyrics"?

    22. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by madprof · · Score: 1

      I, for one, really enjoy reading these idiotic emails. It is not the people's concerns that are funny, more the fact that they bother to make them. They truly believe that sending in these emails will make a difference to someone or even matter. The best way to register a complaint against a site like Slashdot is to stop visiting and find better alternatives.

    23. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Clearly, he knows what he is talking about. I mean, he said so THREE TIMES. Come on, would ANYONE repeat themselves THREE times if they weren't right?

      Really ... Three times! What an argument! I can't believe that you would even TRY to contest his absolute knowledge, he is clearly correct. clearly!

      No doubt about it.
      Three times sure.
      really.

    24. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      "Reading their comments, you just know this is the guy at your local watering hole wearing the nascar hat backwards and having a great time with some light beer. (with some luck, I've just offended a few more people :))) {it's humor people}"

      I can't believe how many people get offended with the truth. It is funny, really.

    25. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the Internet generation. Here are some signs you belong to the Internet Generation. If you agree with more than three of the following, you belong to the Internet Generation.

      o I am under 25 years of age.
      o I constantly feel entitled to everything. If I don't have the money, it is mine for the taking.
      o Someone else's pain makes me feel uncontrolled happiness. The more painful it is, the more joy I feel.
      o I have no sense of style. I prove this daily by wearing clothes that do not fit my body shape/size properly. A belt is functional too?
      o Destruction of other people's property makes me feel like I belong.
      o I have no sense of style. I have copied almost every style from the past five generations hoping no one will notice.
      o If I like an artists, all their music is mine to steal.
      o Theft of music is not stealing.

    26. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      I agree. The disagree mails remind me of how fortunate I am, that idiots like that don't bother me more often.

    27. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Curtman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I live in the center of Canada, where I can't go one single day (even in off season) without someone attempting to talk to me about sports. I have no idea what the connection to hockey might be. Does slashdot sound too much like slapshot? Or is there another connection somewhere?

    28. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Hyppy · · Score: 1

      It's not so I can be 'clean' and 'pure' ... it's so that when I do swear, people know I'm not fucking around.

      I think you may have just changed my life a little.

    29. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      WHOIS on hockeydot.org

      Domain ID:D154008129-LROR
      Domain Name:HOCKEYDOT.ORG
      Created On:05-Sep-2008 19:21:00 UTC
      Last Updated On:05-Sep-2008 19:21:02 UTC
      Expiration Date:05-Sep-2009 19:21:00 UTC
      Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com, Inc. (R91-LROR)
      Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED
      Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
      Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
      Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
      Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED
      Status:ADDPERIOD
      Registrant ID:GODA-052848890
      Registrant Name:Chris Knight

    30. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by danieltdp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Also, what is the expected result of our discussions of this stuff? Is it to pick it apart and analyze it? Is it to provide user generated retorts that you can't due to legal reasons? I shall try a little of both. "

      You shouldn't expect something comming out of idle because that's the section idea,right? No article or comment on idle is expected to have a point. You can say "I prefer idle not to exist", but it is actually delivering what was promissed: nothing but idle time.

      Anyways, I don't like idle either. I would go to over there for this kind of stuff

      --
      -- dnl
    31. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Twitter, is that you?

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    32. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      Clearly.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    33. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by ruemere · · Score: 1

      I think he just wanted to test the speed of reaction. I honestly doubt that a person with a named account could post such mail intentionally.

      Regards, Ruemere

    34. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      He had to have seen the tag line on the front page, not to mention in the title bar. I'm still trying to figure out how he got any connection at all between slashdot and hockey, the two, so far as I know, have nothing in common. Then again, to be fair, I know next to nothing about hockey, so maybe there's something in the name slashdot that actually does sound like something to do with hockey, but only if you're a total hockey nut.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    35. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ boy this is like shooting fish in goddamn barrel.

      AC because of mod points (guess which ones.)

    36. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      Whereas online, we are already desensitized by much worse things, and I tend to swear in jokes most the time.

      So does that make a goatse link the new "fuck you"?

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    37. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe /. looks kind of like a hockey stick hitting a puck?

    38. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by orclevegam · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Technically, theft of music would be shoplifting a CD. I believe you're referring to copyright infringement, as very few people actually steal music these days, it's much simpler to just download it.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    39. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by YodaToad · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've yet to see an argument that would prove you right.

    40. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Maybe you get modded "Flamebait" and "Troll" because they're closer to "Douchebag" than any of the other choices

    41. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, looks like you're going for a record.

      Agreed on the broken mod system. Troll and Flamebait should just be renamed to (-1, I disagree with you, na na na!), and (-1, unpleasant truth). Seems that's all they're used for nowadays.

    42. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you're not an idiot, you're just a hockey fan. And if isn't bleeding with hockey (in this case the internet), you are angered with it. I understand. I'm from Minnesota where many of your kind roam around in large herds laying waste to beer and stadiums. I would suggest moving there for solace and the ability to experience all hockey all the time.

      You are SO obviously not from Canada (nor a hockey fan): hockey is played in arenas or on rinks, never in a stadium. But that's OK, because your point is well-made and perfectly valid (don't flame me, bro!).

    43. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by 32771 · · Score: 1

      "Until you've got positive karma, you might as well be posting directly to /dev/null most of the time."

      You are right, I remember this. Then one magical day I got modded as Troll - the first time - and all of a sudden I received excellent karma.
      I wonder whether other users are similarly blessed.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    44. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      I was AT a hockey game in a stadium last season. Pittsburgh Penguins Vs. Buffalo Sabers, in the Buffalo Bills stadium.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    45. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Dude, he repeats him self. Repeatedly! That should be proof enough for anyone (that he is right).

    46. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 0

      When I get modded troll or flamebait, I like to think of it as a trophy...

      This is exactly why I use Overrated so often. =)

      --

      "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

    47. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ***whoosh***

    48. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Yes, he's exaggerating, but his point is valid. It's very rare when meta-moderating that I find a downmod that doesn't have to be marked unfair.

      And then there's also the bullshit upmods. Like blatant outright lies being modded +5 informative.

      Every time someone gets mod points, they should be forced to look at the section of the FAQ designating what different moderations mean before they get to use those points.

    49. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, if you're dropping f-bombs left and right then where do you go when you're genuinely upset?

      I stop swearing, adorn an emotionless, wide-eyed expression, and speak eloquently at reduced volume.

    50. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Informative

      By definition "Theft of Music" is stealing. Copyright infringement isn't theft.
      Don't like that? Argue with the U. S. Congress. They carefully put copyright law in Title 17 of the U.S. Legal code. The just as carefully put all theft related law in a different whole title. That title is the one reserved for ALL normally criminal violations, as it says right at the start of the code, so the U. S. congress thinks copyright infringement isn't theft AND isn't necessarily criminal at all.
      Argue with the Supreme Court. They ruled that individual states can't enforce copyright, so if violations were theft, they would be taking away the right of the individual states to stop a type of theft happening in their own physical jurisdiction. The Supreme Court has already clarified that that is not what they did.
      Argue with the Constitution. It uses the phrase "for a limited time". If violation equaled theft, then the law would be saying there is a type of theft where objects become too old to be protected under law, just from age and not from any loss of value.
      Argue with the Berne treaty. If violation is theft, then what's all that bit in the treaty about non-criminal violation? Non-criminal theft? That's an oxymoron for sure.

      If you really believe copyright violation is theft, then you need to get up impeachment proceedings against at least four of the current supreme court justices and over 40 still active congressmen who voted on these laws in the 80's and 90's. Depending on just which decisions you would rate as coddling thieves, that could be all the SCOTUS and over 250 active congress-members. You also need to impeach the President, Vice President, Secretary of State, and possibly several members of the cabinet for negotiating and signing various treaties and such. There are at least 10 currently serving ambassadors and their immediate staff that you need to get removed from office too, and various other functionaries. You probably should prosecute a large number of people now out of office, or at least support civil suits for denial of due process against many of them. You also need to get a constitutional amendment passed. If you aren't working for any of this, you don't really believe copyright violation is theft, or you lack the stones to speak truth to power. It's easy to harangue a bunch of rank and file people on slashdot - but if you really mean it, tell the big dogs off.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    51. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look! Das Modell found the "Post Anonymously" button!

    52. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by BattleApple · · Score: 1

      I know that slashing is a penalty in hockey - swinging your stick at an opponent, but I have no idea what "dot" has to do with anything..
      Kind of odd that a sport that involves fist fighting doesn't allow players to even wave their hockey stick at someone

    53. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's generally called being an arrogant ass. It's not whether you're right or wrong, it's about making a blanket, insulting statement and then repeatedly trolling about how 'right' you are. Someone obviously thought that claiming that the "...moderation system is total bullshit and the admins are retards ..." (emphasis mine) was a troll or flamebait.

      The moderation system is not perfect, but the majority of the mods that I see are fair; those complaining about the system being broken are usually the most profane, offensive people.

    54. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if you're dropping f-bombs left and right then where do you go when you're genuinely upset?

      If I may use a Lewis Black phrase to describe my use of profanity, "fuck isn't a word, it's a comma".

      I swear all the god-damn time. I'm also a very calm person who doesn't get upset easily (and I think letting out my minor frustrations with a "fuck!" helps).

      But I assure you that when I get well and truly pissed, nobody has any problem figuring that out. The problem with you non-swearers is that you aren't practiced enough to know how to use profanity to its full extent when needed -- a little "oh shit!" is all that can be mustered before your own shock at your audacity stops you. Trust me when I say I can ramp it up to ridiculous levels of profane creativity when I really want to express myself.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    55. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Quartz25 · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      --
      Most people don't get why the integral of "e to the x" is so funny. Most math majors don't have a sense of humor.
    56. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      It's reasonable to infer that most, or at least many, of the posts from disgruntled ex-readers are like the ones we see. That may or may not actually be the case. There are possible advantages to convincing many slashdot readers that the system, su generis, tends to self select against real idiots. One of these is it lets the editors avoid having to 'fix' things by claiming they aren't broken. These examples could be the worst and many others could have offered much more valid criticisms. Or, they could be pretty typical. Or the editors could actually have picked ones that weren't as bad as the worst, either for spelling or logically speaking (although this last looks highly unlikely). Take the whole thing with a grain of salt.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    57. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Kickersny.com · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I personally hate the horizontal slider for the simple reason that it breaks page up/page down. The browser scrolls by a full 'page', but the toolbar takes up ~10% of the currently-viewed 'page'.

      This makes it very annoying to read the page using spacebar/page down.

    58. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      What was it that prompted Slashdot to start posting its hate mail?

      Haven't you read what /. is about?

      This adds to the Omelette in my opinion, I think it's a great addition to /. on a Friday afternoon.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    59. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by NeilTheStupidHead · · Score: 1
      --
      Lose: misplace or fail || Loose: not bound together
    60. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not only does he repeat himself, he expects a different result everytime. I do believe that this would fit him into the category of 'insane'.

    61. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the first slashdot post I've ever bookmarked for future reference.

      Well done sir, and well-written.

      Posting anon because I already did some mods here, but unfortunately didn't have any left for your post. :(

    62. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by hoofinasia · · Score: 1

      Its got to be the slapshot thing. I've been sitting here staring at the screen and nothing else makes sense. Unless I'M the idiot, which, at 4pm (Central) on friday, I'm a good candidate...

    63. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by bob.appleyard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not on my internets. I have Flamebaits and Trolls auto modded up, so they'll always be +5 Trolls to me!

      --
      How dare you be so modest!! You conceited bastard!!
    64. Re: So Many Questions About This Section by rs232 · · Score: 1

      "Slashdot's moderating system is total bullshit and the admins are retards for still keeping it around. Nearly every downmodding that occurs on Slashdot is 100% invalid"

      I totally agree, it's only use seems to be for some people to mod down posts that are critical of some received wisdom and mod up self serving corporate propaganda. Anthing marked score:5 is invariably of the latter kind. TacoMan might as well get rid of it. Or only allow a restricted set of moderators to use it.

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
    65. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I actually find them fairly entertaining each week."

      You just admitted that you're entertaining by useless, nonsensical things that waste your time. Was that your intent?

      As to the story/article, I find /.'s posting of it rather petty. /. is the MS of websites--it works, but it's mediocre crap where someone is getting paid handsomely for their lack of effort.

      And I'm one that has been reading /. since 1997, although in the past 4 years it's been off and on. I tuned in yesterday and today after a few months, and I see this airing out of email and, well, I find it strikingly stupid that /. has stooped to this.

      I've never gotten an account, e.g. I always post as AC. And I think the moderation system is abysmal--time and time again there has been excellent posts that are made days after a story is posted, which gets no mod points. I've seen retaliatory strikes, group think, and majority ruling overs on posts. It really is crappy, and the continued defense of it...well, let's just say there's always some level of bitching or commentary about the moderation system since it's come out.

      So much so, that the current posts in this thread mod'd as insightful, or funny...aren't. I mean really aren't. Moderation isn't about establishing the better posts, but of finding the average posts everyone agrees on, which makes what gets high scores nothing special, negating at least one of the reasons the mod system was used to begin with. /. It's like MS and Linux. It's just there.

    66. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by spun · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the douchebag generation. here are some signs you might belong to the douchebag generation. If you agree with more than three of the following, you are a total douchebag

      • I make snap judgments of others based on superficial characteristics such as age
      • I constantly feel like people want to hear my opinions about them
      • I project onto others things I, myself do, but can not admit that I do
      • I think I have a sense of style, and I attempt to prove this by telling others they have no style
      • Destruction of people's lives and feelings is okay, but MY property is sacrosanct
      • I think I have a sense of style, but all I do is slavishly follow current trends
      • I make sure to point out all the ways I am superior to you as often as possible
      • I generalize the worst traits of a small group of people onto everyone who is unlike me
      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    67. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Kozz · · Score: 1

      I think it's been in a few people's sigs, and I have to agree with it:

      If you've never been modded flamebait or troll, you're not even trying.

      Look in my history and you'll see I've had a few.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    68. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      What was it that prompted Slashdot to start posting its hate mail?

      I suggested it on a lark. I never expected they would be nuts enough to go through with it.
      Sorry.

      Hopefully McCain will be smarter about my joke suggestion to have Palin as a VP.

    69. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Be grateful, very grateful. I have a Windows tips/tweaks/repair site that does about 4 to 6 GBs of traffic monthly. It isn't that big but it is pretty busy.

      That site is small compared to something like this.

      I get the dumbest, strangest, and most unintelligible emails through there. On the other hand, I sometimes get some really nice compliments and people asking to send me money for having put the information there for them.

      I'm not sure what you can/will take from that but there is the good and the bad is sort of what I mean. I sometimes get hate mail from Linux fans who didn't bother to click the links and see that we run (and sell hosting) on Linux and ignore our contributions to various OSS programs but, all in all, it is still worth it in the end.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    70. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by cecille · · Score: 1

      Agreed, sir. I, too, am no stranger to the everyday non-angry swear. I mean, I'm not a crazy person, but I'm one of those people who's...well...not good around children. Anyway, I found that you can often tell when I'm really upset by the number of swear words that are strung together into one giant swear combination. Get me REALLY mad, and I'm like an eloquent swear-poet, stringing together phrases that no one would ever think would go together, and yet they do.

      --
      ...no two people are not on fire.
    71. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been playing hockey in western Canada at some pretty high levels for nearly 30 years. Other than the similarity to slapshot or a slashing penalty, I have no idea what this guy is talking about!

    72. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know he doesn't expect exactly what he's getting, the same result each time?

    73. Re: So Many Questions About This Section by skam240 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So let me see if I get this right. There's some vast conspiracy amongst the randomly selected slashdot modders to cover up the truth and promote a "self server corporate agenda" (which unless you're a CEO or a board member of a corporation doesn't seem to make sense to me but what do I know?). The answer to this problem is to get rid of it so I have to root through every post some 13 year old kid makes to find something interesting or to place the modding system into the hands of some enlightened elite group of people who know better than everyone else. Is that it?

      If so, my only question is who would choose these enlightened souls and / or who would they be?

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    74. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by IdahoEv · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or is there another connection somewhere?

      I was befuddled as well. Trying to find out what the connection was, I googled "hockey slash". Oops. ... page after page of hockey player slash fiction.

      /me reaches for the brain bleach

      --
      I stole this sig from someone cleverer than me.
    75. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Thruen · · Score: 1

      This was modded... funny? Seriously? And I thought it was a serious question. I don't want to offer bribes or anything, but +1 Informative to the first person to answer the question!

    76. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Curtman · · Score: 1

      It was a serious question. Yay moderation.

    77. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best part is that Das Modell was posting with a karma bonus before today's little outburst, and he's still trying to play the victim. All this whining is because he can't get over the idea of a few of his posts being downmodded.

    78. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by cyborman · · Score: 0

      This is a strait copy and paste from AcidPenguin9873. I think he said it best: "Your first post is clearly a troll by stating that /.'s mod system is broken, as a reply to a comment which is unrelated to /.'s mod system. That's the precise definition of troll; furthermore, it is not a fact (no matter how much anecdotal evidence you offer), but rather, your opinion. Your other N-1 posts (all but the first) are meta-troll and/or meta-flamebait posts; in each post, you argue that the first post shouldn't have been downmodded for being troll/flamebait, thus sparking a useless discussion about trolls and flamebaits and /.'s mod system."

    79. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed all I could think was how entertaining it would be to try to explain to the hockey guy how slashdot DOES mean something and makes a lot more sense in the context of what it actually is, than it would for hockey.

      He is probably that Levi Johnson guy. I wouldn't bother.

    80. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curtman. so you live in Toronto then, as it thinks its the center of Canada.

    81. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Goaway · · Score: 0, Troll

      There goes the worst little saying ever again.

      You know, I threw some dice several times and I expected different results each time! I must be UTTERLY INSANE!

    82. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      very good point. I'm sure slashdot does alright financially, and to make money ... you usually have to deal with uninformed people...

    83. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he thought the /. symbol resembled a hockey stick and puck... ?

    84. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by kimvette · · Score: 1

      This is why rational people who have the time metamoderate when they have the opportunity. Others throw hissy fits when they disagree with someone, and then enter a mental spiral where it can only end hilariously (from everyone else's perspective). Such users are tools and can provide a couple of hours of entertainment until their karma is at a permanent -1.

      Now, why couldn't you just state that a post was modded down incorrectly and why, and leave it to meta-moderators to correct the error? But no, you had to bitch and moan and scream like a demon-possessed character from The Exorcist.

      Some people take douchebaggery to a whole new level. Frankly, I am impressed!

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    85. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by johanatan · · Score: 1

      I think it is the icon you see beside the address in your addressbar (though the similarity to slapshot also occurred to me).

    86. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh.

      Trolling: Posting an inflammatory comment to get a response. Which he's clearly gotten.

      Flamebaiting: Posting an inflammatory comment to get an angry response.

      YHBT, HAND.

    87. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hockey penalty: slashing.

    88. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol internet fight

    89. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you say "Open Sores" (for open source), Linux is not as good as Windows (on whatever grounds), or that Microsoft does great things?

      You can truly expect to be "modded down" here on /. , for sure.

      However, other than that?? This is a good website, that has great news... & on many a level.

      (It's just too bad the *NIX & "OpenSores" lemmings herds mess that right up. I agree @ times & on various points (noted above) with you).

    90. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "What was it that prompted Slashdot to start posting its hate mail?"

      The mad successes of other sites that post their hate mail for their loyal followers to read and masturbate over, what else?

      Seriously, Slashdot is turning more and more into a wannabe Maddox or LowTax site.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    91. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Curtman. so you live in Toronto then, as it thinks its the center of Canada.

      No. I very close to the longitudinal center of Canada. Not the imaginary political one.

    92. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I avoid all this stress by posting Anonymous Coward.

    93. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by antic · · Score: 1

      "What was it that prompted Slashdot to start posting its hate mail?"

      300+ comments in reply = ad revenue. We all keep coming here to whinge and read the complaints, they get pageviews and want more of the same.

      --
      'Thats they exact same thing a banana wrench monkey.'
    94. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Am I the only person that had the sudden urge to register hockeydot.org and have it redirect to Slashdot?"

      Registered. I'll have it redirecting to this story shortly.

      -Chris

      redirect it to a rickroll :)

    95. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Almost every single downmodding that occurs on Slashdot is completely unjustified

      Preach it brother! Why, just the other day I was posting interesting goatse links and hilarious nigger jokes, and I kept getting modded down by fascist moderators.

    96. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Yes true, but it wouldn't be too difficult to put a Slashdot section in for hockey now would it?
      I mean you could have it about hockey technology - Laser guided pucks, Hi-tech blades, auto scoring, computer sims, hockey stick mods, safety gear, helmet comms with video streaming, virtual hockey, hockey in zero gravity.. it's endless!
      And that way, all of his friends would join too!

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    97. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There once was a jerk on Slashdot,
      Whose posts were downmodded a lot,
      So he posted complaints, which were modded flamebait
      And now his karma is shot.

    98. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by faazshift · · Score: 1

      Thats an AWESOME philosophy.

      --
      http://faazshift.blogspot.com/
    99. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Washii · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm curious about this:
      And I think the moderation system is abysmal--time and time again there has been excellent posts that are made days after a story is posted, which gets no mod points

      The moderation system is abysmal because somebody makes a post several days after the story goes up? Within several days, most stories hit the archive bin anyway (for the front page). Very rarely do I go delving into the subcategories, quite often I just scan the front page, middle-click on what seems interesting and read that. But you are saying that moderation is abysmal because the user pool dries up on a several day old article and goes to read the new stuff.

      Would you force people to use half their mod points on articles 3+ days old?

    100. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hail to the AC!

    101. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 1

      They are entertaining. For awhile, I wondered about moderation and how it works here, but figured it out finally. Now, When I get modded troll or flamebait, I like to think of it as a trophy... for having offended someone enough to waste their mod point that way :)

      I prefer to think of the many people upmodding me to 4 or 5 for some random crap that my fingers spewed out in a drunken haze...that requires snookering 2 or 3 of 'em, but...arguably less skill...

      --
      I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
    102. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by KGIII · · Score: 1

      See my latest journal entry. *sighs* I'm sure /. does just fine financially.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    103. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      Yeah the moderation system sucks. Why is there no "banal" option?

    104. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I feel bad for the people who incorporate them into everyday life"

      Fuck you asshole.

    105. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slash is a slang term for hockey.

    106. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by megabeck42 · · Score: 1

      oh my god... you weren't joking.

      --
      fnord.
    107. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by LurkerML · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Slashdot's tendency to weed out all but the most dedicated keeps the signal-to-noise ratio extremely high, but it probably drives away many, many potential posters.

      I always suspected slashdot is a training ground for writers. Or half the Science fiction/fantasy literature out there gets quoted here. ;)

    108. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, yeah, we get it. We're all nerds here and got picked on in school by Nascar jocks and such. Perhaps it's time to get over it?

    109. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by msim · · Score: 1

      I know nearly nothing about hockey, on ice or otherwise, but i've heard that slapshot phrase before.

      Never entered my mind as a possibility that that was what they were talking about, but it's the only idea i've come across that could remotely explain it. Then again just going to the homepage of /. gives you a good idea this is all about IT, even my missus could identify this site as one of my "geek sites" with barely a two second glance at the page.

      oh and Hockeydot.org? not bad, not bad at all.

      --

      Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
    110. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Also, in hockey, don't they basically just slash at a dot on the field?

    111. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by ConradBurner · · Score: 1

      Well... lets just call it ignorance... All them "disagree" mails seem to be sent by people who are ignorant to /. and its origins. Built by geeks who are obvious savvy to flamewars on usenet... The mods/devs understand that its impossible to moderate forums for "niceness" and "on-topic" when they generate enough traffic. So... Get with the program or GTFO. *grabs coat*

    112. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by 12WTF$ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Slash is a particular type of erotic fan fiction where two characters have same-sex relationship.
      cite: www.darrenbarefoot.com/archives/2003/10/hockey-slash.html

      --
      Cryonics - Keep cool and carry on.
    113. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, it does too. www.hockeydot.org

      lmao

    114. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Try hockeyerotica.com

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    115. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

      Try emailing that to them. They might publish you.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    116. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This likely means you satisfy at least two of the three requisites. ;)

    117. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      You're confusing legal definition with common vernacular. Taking something to which you have no right is commonly called "stealing", or, "theft".

      Obviously my post was not a legal brief so your dissertation out of place to say the least. To say, "Johhny stole that song", is an accurate statement despite the fact it's not legally representative of the facts.

    118. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w00t!

    119. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt you see the irony of your statement. Now that's douchebaggery. LOL. Hopefully you can laugh at yourself too.

    120. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      Yes, he's exaggerating, but his point is valid. It's very rare when meta-moderating that I find a downmod that doesn't have to be marked unfair.

      Such is my experience too and since I browse at -1, I see a lot of posts that deserve to be at -1.

      Why is it that I have never, ever to the best of my recollection, been asked to meta-moderate moderation on a goatse link post? I suspect the editors, who have infinite mod points, moderate those down themselves and are not subject to meta-moderation.

    121. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Molochi · · Score: 1

      I think goatse has been depreciated to "damn you". BME Pain Olympics or 2Girls 1Cup is the current "fuck you".

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
    122. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      heh this post makes me so glad I do not know that the BME Pain Olympics are.
      Almost as glad as never having seen the 2 girls 1 cup thing :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    123. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Maybe we will get the choice, that would be good?

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    124. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Kickersny.com · · Score: 1

      You (we) actually do have a choice: press '/' to toggle between vertical, horizontal, and off. Unfortunately, this is mapped to 'quick find' in Firefox, so it conflicts with the default behavior.

      Oh well, just another bug.

    125. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Washii · · Score: 1

      I think I was magically ordained one day as karma positive.

      ...Sounds like some disease.

    126. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      >> how loud do you think an injured rapper would have to raise their voice before people gave them medical attention?
      Oh, so that is why so many rappers get killed and no one seems to notice...
      Apparently everyone just think that a dying rapper is just singing his new song :)

    127. Re: So Many Questions About This Section by rs232 · · Score: 1

      So let me see if I get this right. There's some vast conspiracy amongst the randomly selected slashdot modders ..

      StrawMan deleted ..

      If so, my only question is

      You responding to your own StrawMan don't count .. :)

      "who would choose these enlightened souls and / or who would they be?"

      The owners of slashdot, that's who. Wikipedia deemed to necessary to appoint such a set of moderators to restrict abuse and disruption there. I do believe slashdot would benfit the same.

      Was it really necessary to mod yourself up Score:5, Insightful .. :)

      --
      davecb5620@gmail.com
    128. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by Cheeko (165493) on Friday September 05, @02:50PM (#24891695) Homepage Journal
      I'm a moron.

      --there...fixed that for ya...you're welcome...

    129. Re: So Many Questions About This Section by skam240 · · Score: 1

      In regards to the strawman comment, I honestly don't think I misrepresented your opinion in this situation and furthermore I feel that you have used this excuse to ignore points I brought up in my post such as your phrase "self serving corporate propaganda" (which I regrettably misquoted, although my misquote did not alter the meaning of your statement) which is nothing but alarmist nonsense given that unless your a corporate board member "self serving" and "corporate" are generally not common ground. The phrase, however, is brilliant in regards to the fact that it contains so many alarmist buzz words.

      Furthermore, your desire for the founders of slashdot to moderate the forums in places of the unwashed masses not only wreaks of elitism but does not logically hold together. If these are the same people that implemented the public rating system for comments and have kept it going for so long then obviously their judgment should be held as questionable by those who do not view this system as the most efficient. If they have such questionable judgment then they are obviously not fit to judge over such a large body of people.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    130. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    131. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I threw some dice several times and I expected different results each time! I must be UTTERLY INSANE!

      If you expected that the number of pips that were showing on the tops of those dice to add up to a number that was not between 2 and 12, then you might be insane. Or retarded.
      If you got a different result every time, then you were obviously throwing the dice differently, in which case you weren't weren't doing the same thing and expecting different results. You smarmy ass.

    132. Re:So Many Questions About This Section by Goaway · · Score: 1

      And how, exactly, do you then suggest anybody do anything in exactly the same way twice?

  2. The Dunning-Kruger Effect by D+Ninja · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I suggest you think about changing your name to something that isn't obviously about hockey. I asked some coworkers and they agree, I'm not just some idiot.

    This made me laugh out loud. Funny how stupid people always think they're smarter than they are.

    1. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 3, Funny

      >> Funny how stupid people always think they're smarter than they are.

      Oh yeah? Well I suggest you think about changing your name to something that isn't obviously about ninjas.

    2. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by digitalhermit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's another effect that's quite similar: People over-estimate mediocre skills in others when they don't possess that skill. For example, I am, at best, an average math student by most standards. However, some people think I'm mathematically gifted because I can explain a linear equation.

      Then there's the effect where people assume someone is smart because they agree on some irrelevant point. For example, say I oppose the (current incarnation) of the death penalty. Others think I'm smart because they oppose the death penalty. However, my argument may be based on the fairness of the punishment (i.e., not carried out equally to all violators) whereas their argument may be religiously based (thou shalt not kill). Politicians exploit this quite often. "I am a , therefore I am a good choice for this office."

    3. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That link is a riot. A 'study' that tries to rank in a 'scientific' way how funny someone is, and thus prove that people who think they know things, really don't.

      It's hard to tell if the irony is intended or not.

    4. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I've been trying to remember the name of that effect for months now.

    5. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by bonehead · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not being a hockey fan, I guess I'm in need of some education. Just exactly how is the name slashdot "obviously about hockey"?

    6. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot rhymes with hockey puck.

      It's an easy mistake to make.

    7. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by maxume · · Score: 1

      Did you read the paper? Here is is if you didn't:

      http://www.apa.org/journals/features/psp7761121.pdf

      They didn't try to rank how funny the people were, they tried to rank how well they compared to comedians in evaluating the humor of various jokes.

      It isn't nearly as bad as your I'm-cool-because-I'm-skeptical attitude would imply.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      /.
      It looks like a hockey stick hitting a puck..

      Or maybe a reference to, ummm, hockey slash.

      Google "Hockey slash."

      It's about as SFW as Googling "angry dragon" or "pearl necklace".

    9. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by DJStealth · · Score: 2, Informative

      /. looks like a hockey stick.

    10. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 1

      I actually thought that article was fairly interesting--it describes something I've observed before, especially with computer programmers. After writing their first Hello World program, people tend to think of themselves as sufficiently competent that they can list programming as a skill on a resume. I've fallen into that trap myself more than once, but it never occurred to me that it might be a quantifiable phenomenon. It also never occurred to me that the comments under and Idle posting might lead to discovering something worth thinking about...

      --
      /...
    11. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by fgodfrey · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that he got here thinking he was at "SlapShot" not "Slashdot". A slap shot in hockey is where you shoot the puck by swinging the stick back to about waist height and "slapping" the puck with it (as opposed to a wrist shot where you shoot the puck by flicking your wrists).

      --
      Go Badgers! -- #include "std/disclaimer.h"
    12. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      While I don't have the time to read the whole paper, I read the first two pages, as well as the Method for the assessment of humor, and the designers of that study definitely overestimated their ability to perform a proper study. In fact every single respondent underestimated their ability to recognize what is funny. Why? Because what is funny is an OPINION. It is not a fact. Every single respondent was able to determine what was funny with 100% accuracy. They start off with a self selecting group of only 8 people to try to define opinion as fact. They then dismiss 12.5% of the respondents because they did not agree with them. They then ask 30 questions ("How funny do you find this joke?"), but use 30 different questions ("How funny does 87.5% of stand-up comedians that will respond to an email poll find this joke?") to rank the answers. They then came to the conclusion that the people that have a different opinion of what is funny than 87.5% of this small group where incompetent.

      So, no they did not try to "rank how well they compared to comedians in evaluating the humor of various jokes.". They compared how funny people thought a joke was compared to a small subset of a specific type of comedian. What they TRIED to do, and CLAIMED to do was determine how funny a joke was, and how good people were at evaluating how funny the joke was compared to how funny it actually was. They failed miserably at what they TRIED to do, and what they did do was a pointless exercise that tells you nothing of value.

      You see, it isn't an "I'm-cool-because-I'm-skeptical" attitude. It is an "I'm-cool-because-I-can-recognize-that-this-particular-study-is-B-S" attitude.

      What we have is a group of individuals telling us that they are competent at judging competency, and that they have determined that people who think they are competent frequently aren't because they lack the competency to judge competency. Jeez, the irony of the entire exercise is profound.

    13. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by tobiah · · Score: 1

      mod parent up!

      --
      "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
    14. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by maglor_83 · · Score: 1

      ... I really hope that's not the real reason. /. doesn't look like a hockey stick. And it looks even less like an ice-hockey stick, which given the largely North American audience, I assume is being referred to.

    15. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by Skrapion · · Score: 1

      Hmm... is there a rare form of dyslexia where you rotate a letter upside down and move it a couple positions to the left?

      My first guess was that he was thinking about slashing.

      --
      The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
    16. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by DaTroof · · Score: 1

      Dunning and Kruger concede that humor is open to interpretation. They included it because they wanted to apply the theory to social skills as well as intellectual ones. The other parts involve logic and grammar, which are far less subjective. You've serendipitously overestimated your ability to criticize the study due to your lack of knowledge about it.

    17. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you are NOT a hockey fan!

    18. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I know that you were going for funny, but there was no overestimation. a third of their study was 100% off base. Their base hypothesis was wrong. Their methodology was wrong. Their analysis of the data was wrong and their conclusion was wrong. When a third of a study is wrong, and it is wrong on every level, a well reasoned person tosses the whole thing. The 'researchers' have lost all credibility. Throwing in 'open to interpretation' is just a poor excuse. There is no 'interpretation' in the stated goal. I can give you the answer right here an now. All people are always 100% accurate in determining what is funny. This is by definition, as funny is an opinion. The humor part does not in any way apply to social skills. Their test is no more valid that if they had asked 8 house painters, via email, what are the best colors. Then dismissed 12.5% of the answers. Finally asking the study subjects to judge what colors are the best. The very premise that you can get any kind of 'correct' answer is absurd.

      Again, at least one third of the entire study is complete and utter BS. That leaves no credibility for the other two thirds. The 'researchers' were very simply incompetent.

    19. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by DaTroof · · Score: 1

      I can give you the answer right here an now. All people are always 100% accurate in determining what is funny. This is by definition, as funny is an opinion. The humor part does not in any way apply to social skills. Their test is no more valid that if they had asked 8 house painters, via email, what are the best colors.

      People are not always so accurate in determining what other people will think is funny. That's where the social part comes into play. A house painter might think black is the best color, but if he said that most people want their bathrooms to be painted black, a survey could prove him wrong.

      Please note that I'm not really trying to defend the humor test. It's definitely imperfect. I'm not sure of how else to measure a social skill, but at the very least, their check sample (the professional comedians) seems too small to consider conclusive. The same argument, however, does not apply to the logic and grammar tests. I wouldn't disregard them simply because you disagree with the first one.

    20. Re:The Dunning-Kruger Effect by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Except that they DID NOT ask the subjects "what will a professional stand up comic think is funny". They asked "how funny is this joke"? The study does not have just too small of a set data points. The very premise and methodology was wrong, even if they would have had a large enough sampling group. The massive failure to even be able to come up with a logical methodology for the humor part of the paper shows that the 'researchers' were NOT COMPETENT at formulating tests for research purposes or even understand the simple answers given by the subjects. Given that, their whole paper was an exercise in irony, and must be dismissed as having no redeeming value. If they can make the mistake of confusing "What is funny" with "What does a professional stand-up comedian think is funny", then who knows how much of their "data" is completely wrong because they misstated the results. I could argue about their poor understanding of the word "competent", or they didn't account for finite sets of knowledge vs. infinite sets of knowledge, but that is all besides the point. They showed that they were incompetent at research, and published a paper that quite literally could be taken as a joke. The kind of joke that would be pulled by Andy Kaufman. But a joke none the less.

  3. idle by qoncept · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It blows my mind you're still posting this garbage on slashdot. Listen to your users.

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:idle by qoncept · · Score: 1, Funny

      And someone modded me down like they weren't thinking the same thing. HEH!

      --
      Whale
    2. Re:idle by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe you should write slashdot an email to complain.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    3. Re:idle by TheGeniusIsOut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It blows my mind that people complain about something tagged as a complete waste of time and you should never go there being a complete waste of time but still going there...

      --
      Ignorance is Bliss -- And the Opposite is True -- Genius is Madness
    4. Re:idle by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      If only you represented anything more than your own self, people might listen to you on such topics. Alas, you are but one person in a vast wasteland of opinions, many of which are (this is the important part) nothing like your own.

    5. Re:idle by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, listen to your users.

      I find idle to be an aptly named entertaining time-waster.

      Please count me as a vote to keep it, in all its green-backgrounded, hate-mail-filled glory.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    6. Re:idle by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      I likes it as well...All work and no play makes for a dull day. I wish all the goddamn whiners would learn to use the goddamn preferences if they don't want to see it.

      HERE is the LINK you whiny bastards...Scroll down to "idle" and put the little dot in the little radio box under the universal circle/slash that means DO NOT WANT.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    7. Re:idle by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      Yes, listen to your users and keep posting this.

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    8. Re:idle by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 1

      You can keep idle off the mainpage, but as long as idle feature articles contaminate the main RSS feed, people will be unwillingly reminded of its existence.

    9. Re:idle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Count this as another vote to keep the disagree mail. It is an excellent way to waste a minute or so of my time, which is really all I ask of any slashdot posting. The ones like this are funnier than the first few you posted, which were from people who were obviously mentally ill. But I can't get enough of snickering at people's outrage at the hate-drenched moderation system.

    10. Re:idle by jfruhlinger · · Score: 1

      Grah, I wasn't signed in! A real user hearts disagree mail, I swear!

    11. Re:idle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And not just any e-mail. Make it an angry and crazy one.

    12. Re:idle by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      slashdot should run a poll about what to do to idle.

      --
      -- dnl
    13. Re:idle by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's right, listen to your users, and this use says Keep it up, I love it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:idle by DirkGently · · Score: 1

      That was a good one. If only there were mod points in here.

      I say keep it, too. It may render like ass in IE7 (if I'm wasting time at work, it's what I gotta use), but that last email was a good one.

      --

      I keep trying to pick fights, but I can't shake this Excellent karma.

    15. Re:idle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should write slashdot an email to complain.

      I would write an email to complain but I can't find the email address to complain.

    16. Re:idle by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Well, if they dropped idle, Das Modell might not have had his mental meltdown happen today, and THEN what would slashdotters have done for entertainment this afternoon? ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    17. Re:idle by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Gosh, that must be terrible for you, having to make all the effort to click on the story, then click on something else.

      If you're really that lazy, and are using Thunderbird as your RSS reader, you can apply filters to perform actions on incoming messages based on keywords, content, etc.

      You're welcome.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    18. Re:idle by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 1

      Flamebait?

      I provided a useful tip, admittedly in a rather sarcastic tone- a tone that was fitting for the pointlessness of the issue at hand.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    19. Re:idle by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1
      Quoth Hunter-killer

      You can keep idle off the mainpage, but as long as idle feature articles contaminate the main RSS feed, people will be unwillingly reminded of its existence.

      Then use something like yahoo pipes to filter out all the idle stories from the feed. Or if you can't be bothered doing that, then simply subscribe to the following feed. http://m1.pipes.vip.sp1.yahoo.com/pipes/pipe.info?_id=527129296c75002203989957b76e87d9

    20. Re:idle by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 1

      I was under the (mistaken) impression that filtering had to be done by the reader; that wouldn't have been an option for me since I use iGoogle. Yahoo Pipes looks like it will fit the bill. Thanks.

  4. Slashot? Hockey? by McGuirk · · Score: 1

    Will somebody explain to me why the hockey guy thought slashdot had anything to do with hockey? Maybe I'm just a sports-illiterate nerd, but I don't see the connection.

    1. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Captain+Spam · · Score: 1

      "Slashing" is one of a wide variety of penalties in the sport of ice hockey. And...

      um...

      It's... in the name, "Slashdot"? That's... that's all I got. I mean, I can describe slashing (by law, all Detroit-area natives are required to study hockey), I can tell you it's more often than not a two-minute minor unless blood is drawn, but as to how anyone could possibly associate that with Slashdot is beyond me. We can at least be glad he didn't send any money to the site, else we would have a big problem right now.

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
    2. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by danking · · Score: 1

      Will somebody explain to me why the hockey guy thought slashdot had anything to do with hockey? Maybe I'm just a sports-illiterate nerd, but I don't see the connection.

      A slash is an infraction in hockey that can result in a penalty. I guess that is the only use of the term he knows.

    3. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by abigor · · Score: 4, Informative

      To slash someone in hockey means to strike them with the blade of your stick, usually the lower legs. If the ref sees you do it, it's a two minute minor penalty.

    4. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I was thinking conflation of slashing, and the term 'slapshot', which is auditorily similar to 'slashdot'...
      *shrug*. Could also be just a fuckin' loonie like writer # 1 :)

    5. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Programmer_In_Traini · · Score: 1

      Slashdot / Slapshot ... there's why

      --
      If you look like your passport photo, you're too ill to travel. - Will Kommen
    6. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps he should try underscoreslashdot.org ( "_/." ).

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    7. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      I was thinking pictorially. Take a look a the icon. /.

      If you squint a bit it looks like the edge of a hockey blade (the /) hitting a puck ( the . ).

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
    8. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      And what, pray tell, does 'dot' mean in hockey language? :)

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    9. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 1

      The characters /. look vaguely like an ascii art rendition of a hockey stick and puck. Maybe that's what he meant.

      --
      /...
    10. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm sure the guy was equally pissed that digg.com is not about shovels and holes.

      And The Onion. Don't even get him started on The Onion.

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    11. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by blackjackshellac · · Score: 1

      I'm canadian, and I started playing hockey when I was 4 year old, and I can tell you I'm just as dumbfounded as you. I think it might ahve to do with the penalty that results from slashing someone with one's stick, how the dot figures into it I just don't know. Maybe it's a troll.

      --
      Salut,

      Jacques

    12. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a hockey mom.

    13. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      And what, pray tell, does 'dot' mean in hockey language? :)

      Same as every other sport played in an arena. It's a candy you pick up at the concession stand.

    14. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alright, alright. We can't afford to give up any more penalty plays. Everybody, stop slashing Dot.

    15. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      (by law, all Detroit-area natives are required to study hockey)

      I've known a number of people from Michigan and I'm certain the law is not specific to Detroit, but is in fact a state wide requirement.

    16. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Yeah...among the hundreds of other things that slash means. It means something slightly more bloody to a serial killer. What I want to see is hate mail from a serial killer on the misguided name of /.

      Wait...the favicon is a stick and a puck! We're all a bunch of liars.

    17. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a back slash or a forward slash?

    18. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps he should try underscoreslashdot.org ( "_/." ).

      What does a golf site have to do with anything?

    19. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by vjmurphy · · Score: 1

      And the dot part is obviously "damage over time." This site doubly insults World of Warcraft-playing hockey goalies.

      --
      Vincent J. Murphy
      Spandex Justice
    20. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      Actually, he was looking for the movie slaPshot. Just a simple one-letter-typo.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    21. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "slapshot" + beer = "slashdot"

    22. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will somebody explain to me why the hockey guy thought slashdot had anything to do with hockey?

      Maybe I'm just a sports-illiterate nerd, but I don't see the connection.

      I completely missed it, but my wife pointed out that perhaps he has mistaken "slashdot" for "slapshot".

      Perhaps he's played too much hockey, eh?

    23. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now I feel so much better about the confusion I experienced at five years of age, when my father listened to Hockey on the radio, and I was terrified about what having a 'FACE OFF' implied!!!

    24. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Played hockey through high school and college. I'm pretty sure I qualify as a geek as well. So, well, I can see no realistic connection at all.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    25. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Eh? The joke about the lepper hockey game and the face off in the corner....

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    26. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Zwicky · · Score: 1

      Ah but this guy is a fan of many things. You should have seen this guy's emails to Apple (fruit fan), Sun (solar fan), Red Hat (hat fan) and Pedia (I'm sure you get the idea)!

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
    27. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ball?
      Have a look at the slashdot logo. It looks like a stick about to hit a ball.

    28. Re:Slashot? Hockey? by richardkelleher · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that if you hit a ball with a hockey stick while on the ice you will draw an extended penalty along with the screams of pain.

  5. Is idle growing on me??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, but disagree mail is. This crap is actually kinda funny. But the rest of idle is pants!

  6. Well hell... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...mod Mr. Hockey +5 Informative. I had no idea there was slashing in hockey. Do they use, like, kendo swords or something?

    rj

    1. Re:Well hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you consider a wooden stick with a blade on the end a kendo sword then yes they do use kendo swords.

      Clearly you have not seen Slap Shot, which had a complete demonstration of all the major penalties and infractions that someone can commit.

    2. Re:Well hell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wooden??? where have u been? metal FTW

    3. Re:Well hell... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      To slash someone in hockey means to have nonsensical homoerotic episodes with them, usually accompanied by bad dialogue. If the ref sees you do it, it's a two minute minor penalty.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:Well hell... by jonadab · · Score: 1

      > I had no idea there was slashing in hockey.

      Yeah, me neither, but then, my knowledge of hockey is about on par with my knowledge of cuneiform writing. When I was a kid, I thought hockey was played outdoors on grass. I didn't find out otherwise until I saw that movie about the lawyer who has to coach a group of kids for community service and teaches them to quack like ducks. I'm from Ohio, and hockey isn't exactly a major sport around here. The major sports around here are football, football, football, more football, cheerleading (in conjunction with football), and marching band (also in conjunction with football). Occasionally you run into somebody who's into basketball or baseball on the side, but that's niche stuff. Sometimes gradeschool kids play soccer in the Y leagues, but once they hit middle school they're old enough to play football. Some older men play golf, but they *watch* football (if they watch sports at all). High schools also have teams for wrestling and cross country, but they aren't permitted to interfere with football.

      Hockey... I think maybe they play that in Europe someplace? Not sure. Never heard of anyone playing it around here.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  7. This Rank Garden by Ngarrang · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Women, children and people of faith will never be able to learn what you have to impart because of the filth you are tending in this rank garden."

    What? Hold the horses, here! There is something to be learned from Slashdot? And here I thought it was a place for over-opinionated (and often bored) tech folks committing the equivalent of mental masturbation.

    --
    Bearded Dragon
    1. Re:This Rank Garden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More usually mental S&M IME.

    2. Re:This Rank Garden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I learned how stick a hockey puck in my girlfriends ass from Slashdot. Good thing she isn't a fucking Christian!

       

    3. Re:This Rank Garden by nsayer · · Score: 1

      If you're commenting here, you could not possibly have a girlfriend.

    4. Re:This Rank Garden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ^^^ So you have indicated that you, in fact, do NOT have a girlfriend? hahaha

    5. Re:This Rank Garden by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      "There is something to be learned from Slashdot?"

      Depends. I let my niece read it, and in just a few hours she learned a bunch of new words. :)

    6. Re:This Rank Garden by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      and who let the women and children in? They're supposed to be on the ark waiting for the flood, damnit

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    7. Re:This Rank Garden by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      What? Hold the horses, here! There is something to be learned from Slashdot? And here I thought it was a place for over-opinionated (and often bored) tech folks committing the equivalent of mental masturbation.

      See, that's what you learn from Slashdot.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    8. Re:This Rank Garden by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Sure there is something to learn

      Vocabulary words such as Shit, Fuck, Atheist.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:This Rank Garden by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      How DARE you use the "A" word around us fucks!

      --
    10. Re:This Rank Garden by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      What? Hold the horses, here! There is something to be learned from Slashdot? And here I thought it was a place for over-opinionated (and often bored) tech folks committing the equivalent of mental masturbation.

      I find your characterization of us to be completely unwarranted and false, and I will be sure to tell you EXACTLY how I feel as soon as I have discarded this wad of Kleenex.

    11. Re:This Rank Garden by KGIII · · Score: 1

      That should probably be a criminal act. No one should subject their relatives to /. ever. Then again, I showed my niece lolcats. If there's a hell - I'll see you there.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    12. Re:This Rank Garden by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Hey! Mental masturbation takes time, you gotta have faith in it, otherwise nothing will come of it.

    13. Re:This Rank Garden by the-ambiguity · · Score: 1

      Obviously all people of faith are men since women, children and people of faith appear to be mutually exclusive groups...

    14. Re:This Rank Garden by liquidf · · Score: 1

      mental masturbation? well do they at least make a cream so it doesn't chafe and get all red and hurty?

      --
      i've had just about enough of your vassar bashing.
    15. Re:This Rank Garden by Jasper__unique_dammi · · Score: 1

      Well ejaculated.

    16. Re:This Rank Garden by Ngarrang · · Score: 1

      Well ejaculated.

      Spank you.

      --
      Bearded Dragon
  8. Re: Sens sign Isbister for 1-Year contract by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
    He did a pretty good job last year for the Canucks. I think he's a good pick for the Sens.

    On Wed, 23 Jan 2008 ******** wrote:
    If you don't want others to be confused to I suggest you think about changing your name to something that isn't obviously about hockey.

    Sheesh. What's problem...?

  9. nod and nix? by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

    wtf?

    1. Re:nod and nix? by Captain+Spam · · Score: 1

      Obviously, this post was approved by both the Brotherhood of NOD and various *nix users (* can't be used in a tag, you see). All we need now is an article with gdi and bsd tags, and we'll have teams for a round of Command and Compile.

      --
      Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  10. our plea by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

    I try to live a bad dirty life by not reading any articles and poisoning my body and spirit. I'm afraid that I do not want you to be a part of of this community as I find you healthy. Healthy in mind body and soul. Why you deem it necessary to not use language that we do I can never understand. Geeks, nerds, and dweebs will never be able to learn what you impart because of the impeccable cleanliness of your flowery garden. Please stop receiving our email.

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  11. "...people of faith will never be able to learn.." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You got THAT right.

  12. Three frickin' emails!? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I seeing this right!? I don't have a problem with the idle section, but this isn't even worthy of an Idle thread.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  13. Holy Crap!@! by Bobfrankly1 · · Score: 1

    That guy is right!! One month before hockey season opens, and there's not a single thought to be had about it here!!! Thats it! I'm going home and I'm taking my puck with me!!!

    1. Re:Holy Crap!@! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  14. I can answer one of your questions. by RandoX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why your people deem it necessary to use the language that they do I can never understand
     
    We're a VB.Net shop. The language was forced upon us. We don't like it any more than you do. Sorry.

    1. Re:I can answer one of your questions. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was Hillarious! Nice wordplay!

    2. Re:I can answer one of your questions. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      Sneak in some C# once in a while, 90% of them will never notice

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    3. Re:I can answer one of your questions. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      This is one of those times when I wish a score of 6 was possible. Very funny.

    4. Re:I can answer one of your questions. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      If they did allow for a 6, you would just be asking for a 7.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:I can answer one of your questions. by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If I knew 6 was possible, I'd go straight for 100.

  15. Karma=Bad by arizwebfoot · · Score: 0

    Now that my karma is bad - for the first time - I've got nothing to lose.

    The modders must be high on something strong . . . like . . . over sugar'd kool-aid . . .

    I've had a rash of being modded down and now I'm a baaaad boy.

    Wonder what my mum would say.


    Karma is like a VW - small, it floats, and is outdated - though attractive.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy.
    1. Re:Karma=Bad by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Yes, you do... you can have terrible karma where you post at -1. No one comes back from that, it's like you're dead to the rest of /. You inhabit the world of shit eaters and racist bigots (who probably play lots of hockey).

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    2. Re:Karma=Bad by goofyspouse · · Score: 1

      shit eaters and racist bigots

      I'll admit it...I LOLed.

  16. Stop It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop trying to be Digg. Seriously. Slashdot is supposed to be uber geeky and you guys are steadily letting non geek stuff slip through, and adding unnecessary features in order to keep up with.. what, the mainstream? This post isn't even funny. Why add useless features like the idle section? Doesn't that go against everything we stand for?

    Damn.

  17. My prediction by OzPeter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sometime soon this section will die a slow death, but the stinking corpse will still lay around for all to see. Kinda like Slashback or those regular friendly fireside chats Cmdr Taco started (and then stopped) all those years ago.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:My prediction by someguy · · Score: 1

      I miss the quickies. Where's the love?

      --
      A planet where apes evolved from men? Long live the apes.
    2. Re:My prediction by qw0ntum · · Score: 1

      I thought Slashback was great. Follow-ups to stories? It was at least a better way to continue the discussion than a dupe.

      --
      'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
    3. Re:My prediction by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 1

      : (
      I liked slashback.

      --
      Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
  18. The Profanity Guy by TheModelEskimo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's sad to me that someone like the profanity guy just doesn't have a clue about the emailing mechanism (if he is indeed seeing emailed articles). I support people in their right to really find their own niche on the web; it's just too bad that many of them will never find it because the curve is too steep. Those of us who are happy to use Slashdot have already found our own ways of blocking trash we don't like, but many people are forced to wade through LOTS of stuff that they don't want to see as part of their normal web-surfing experience.

    So, I totally sympathize with him, even though it's obvious his email is misdirected.

    1. Re:The Profanity Guy by Xtravar · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if he got some of that spam that hijacks peoples' email addresses. That's the only way his message would make half-sense: if he got spam for viagra or porn forged from a slashdot.org address.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  19. Please Stop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idle is pants.

  20. I disagree (*urgent*) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theregister.co.uk has an alternative google chrome comic which is notably funnier.

    Everybody understands the google hype engine. Is slashdot afraid of the giant that lives inside the matchbox?

  21. Epimenides would be proud by spazdor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is fantastic. Your comment disproves itself!

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    1. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Score:-1, Flamebait)

    2. Re:Epimenides would be proud by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      And ... if you keep posting long enough, and loud enough, then people will listen.

      And believe.

      Or add you to their foe list, and never have to read your uninformed dribble ever again.

    3. Re:Epimenides would be proud by randyest · · Score: 1

      Hey there. Just wanted to thank you; your comments are the only thing funny in this entire thread!

      Cheers!

      --
      everything in moderation
    4. Re:Epimenides would be proud by spazdor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was just gonna leave the thread as it was because I thought it was funnier to let you have the last bewildered, headscratching word.

      But since you're intent on dragging it on and on (I commend you for having the courage for a karma suicide of this magnitude), here is a point-by-point explanation.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flamebait

      I would characterize calling the admins retards as consistent with the above definition.

      You said "Nearly every downmodding that occurs on Slashdot is 100% invalid."

      But your flamebait was correctly modded as such.

      100% valid.

      Now post an angry reply to this so you can lose 3 more points.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    5. Re:Epimenides would be proud by MadnessASAP · · Score: 1

      Keep up the good work buddy, you're still posting at +2 right now but I'm sure in a few minutes you'll be posting at -1 for every comment.

      --
      I may agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to face the consequences of saying it.
    6. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It's a fact that the system is broken.

      He's right, but for a different reason. Even after all of his utterly useless "100% valid comments" getting downmodded to flamebait, he's still posting with a Karma bonus.

    7. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      This is fantastic. Your comment disproves itself!

      I've read /. since 1999, though I only signed up in the last year. Over nearly a decade of reading, this is my favorite post, given the context up and down the thread from it.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    8. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Curtman · · Score: 1

      Go ahead and suggest a system that works better. I dare you.

    9. Re:Epimenides would be proud by jason.sweet · · Score: 1

      The mod system isn't broken.

      But your sense of humor is.

      Go ahead. Prove me wrong.

    10. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for no reason[citation needed]

    11. Re:Epimenides would be proud by smbarbour · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps the fact that you are being flamed in the responses to your posts, indicates that your posts are, in fact, "flamebait"

      Additionally, the abusive verbiage used in your original post indicates that you were posting clearly for incendiary value.

    12. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Dekker3D · · Score: 1

      so you're going around, annoying everyone, and you expect to be taken just as seriously afterwards? i need a sniff of whatever you're smoking, man!

    13. Re:Epimenides would be proud by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      As it appears you are.....

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    14. Re:Epimenides would be proud by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 1

      OMG people don't think I'm as smart as *I* Think I am... and they don't think that my comments are funny/smart/intellegent!!!

      the system must be broken!!!

    15. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Surt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A completely public mod system. If you downmod someone, and I don't approve of your moderation, then I can filter your moderations in the future. Also allow controls for recently created accounts to prevent advertisers from spamming new accounts, and you're done. Better moderation system achieved.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    16. Re:Epimenides would be proud by AcidPenguin9873 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You've been downmodded over 10 times because of your N posts, N of them are trolls and/or flamebait.

      Your first post is clearly a troll by stating that /.'s mod system is broken, as a reply to a comment which is unrelated to /.'s mod system. That's the precise definition of troll; furthermore, it is not a fact (no matter how much anecdotal evidence you offer), but rather, your opinion. Your other N-1 posts (all but the first) are meta-troll and/or meta-flamebait posts; in each post, you argue that the first post shouldn't have been downmodded for being troll/flamebait, thus sparking a useless discussion about trolls and flamebaits and /.'s mod system.

      PLONK

    17. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Curtman · · Score: 1

      So if I created 10 accounts a year ago, I can now mod you 10 times in one discussion?

    18. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Surt · · Score: 1

      Sure, same as you can do now, except in my system everyone who thinks those accounts are abusive can delist them from their private view of moderation.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    19. Re:Epimenides would be proud by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's a pretty good idea. Though it wouldn't need to be public as such to achieve the effect, only the system would need to remember which mods made which moderations. Having said that I haven't seen a better system that /. for moderating anywhere on the internet.

    20. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Surt · · Score: 1

      I think it either has to be public or have a lot of support infrastructure around it ... ie, if I have a personal blacklist, it's valuable to have all of my 'friends' be able to evaluate that, and consider adding to their own blacklists.

      I guess really the key is to have a lot of meta-information about the moderation system available to the user, and to allow users to share that meta-information. This would work much more effectively to control moderation than the current metamod system.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    21. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Curtman · · Score: 1

      If you have 10 accounts now, probably only one of them will have mod points at any given time if you've done enough whoring to get the karma to deserve them on all 10 accounts.

    22. Re:Epimenides would be proud by kimvette · · Score: 1

      At this point your karma is shot and no one will have to mod you down anymore. 19 posts modded down in a single day? You did us a service with your special brand of asshattery.

      Today's moderators: We slashdotters thank you. Generally I dislike downmodding and when I moderate I mod great posts up, but Das here is a particularly amusing troll and if I had points to spend, I'd mod him down as well. Kudos to the moderators today! It's always greatly amusing to watch a two-year-old brat throw a tantrum.

      (oh and just to set the record straight: if you have a problem with something on /. just contact the admins. Believe it or not they DO respond!)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    23. Re:Epimenides would be proud by PC+and+Sony+Fanboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's a logical fallacy: affirmation of the consequent. He could get flamed for many reasons, so we can't conclusively say that his posts are flamebait because they drew flames.

      But we can say that it is very VERY likely ...

    24. Re:Epimenides would be proud by kimvette · · Score: 1

      The system works; it keeps people like you filtered out when we want to read quality posts.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    25. Re:Epimenides would be proud by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

      How about no system?

    26. Re:Epimenides would be proud by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Actually "karma" is one of the neatest checks in /.'s moderation system. Chances are if a user is modded down often enough, the user is a douchebag no one wants to read.

      Everyone gets modded down from time to time. Post in a political forum, or a religious forum, etc. you'll invariably be modded down by someone who is "offended" because you posted an opinion not in line with their own. Or, you could post a "witty" comment which is taken the wrong way. It happens to everyone now and then. However, the occasional "flamebait" or "troll" mod won't affect you at all if those posts are in the minority because your average is hardly affected (and meta moderators should correct that eventually).

      As you post you build an average score: thankfully those who go mental on here tend to hover at the -1 or less level. Once you reach that point (as you probably will today) no one needs to mod your posts any more to avoid reading your drivel; their threshold settings will keep moronic posts hidden.

      All in all, it is a great system.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    27. Re:Epimenides would be proud by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Anyone with half a brain can see that it's broken.

      Perhaps, but those with MORE than half a brain can see that it is not broken. ;)

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    28. Re:Epimenides would be proud by OldSchoolNapster · · Score: 2, Funny

      (alt. account to avoid undoing moderation :-)

      hahaha. What did you expect to happen?

      You posted 10 blatenty flamebaitish messages all stating the exact same thing.

      The first one got modded down because it was flamebait, and you posted the exact same thing 10 more times. The moderation given to your flamebait posts calling admins and moderators and retards was completely appropriate.

      By the way, I gave you your first "flamebait" mod for your initial post calling admins retards. Calling someone a retard is flamebait, plain and simple.

      When you posted to complain with your illogical explenation that your blatant flamebait was in fact not flamebait, and that you are one of the few people that knows what flamebait is, I modded that post overrated.

      When you posted yet another blatant flamebait post, I modded that one flamebait as well. Then I ran out of modpoints.

      Look, there are some inappropriate moderations around here from time to time. I have been a victim of them myself, but that does not make the system fundamentally broken. It's just an environmental factor that you just kind of have to deal with.

      I sometimes post things knowing that I will get modded down. I've called moderators retards and been modded down for it.

      The trick is to limit your losses by limiting the amount of posts you make that you can reasonably expect to get modded down. Blatant flamebait will get modded down, and your posts are blatant flamebait, redundant, offtopic, and if not for the fact that you may actually be this mentally unstable, trolls.

      I don't want to undo my moderation because I (and everyone else) know it was entirely appropriate, but I will sign this message and tell you the main reason I modded you down instead of just moving on and chalking your post up to just another idiot in the shitheap.

      I thought there was a good chance you would fly off the handle. I never imagined you would take it this far, but I must admit that I am very glad it happened.

      Yes, I am an asshole, and a troll, but your posts were blatant flamebait and were modded appropriately.

      bit trollent

    29. Re:Epimenides would be proud by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Has it occurred to you that maybe the moderation system worked perfectly here because you're being a dick?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    30. Re:Epimenides would be proud by spazdor · · Score: 1

      So if I created 10 accounts a year ago, I can now mod you 10 times in one discussion?

      Certainly. If you have contributed enough of value to Slashdot's discussions that you accumulated karma to imbue ten accounts with mod points, I don't really have a problem letting you make ten moderations in a row.

      If you are abusive with that privilege, metamoderation will take it away from you before long.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    31. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Curtman · · Score: 1

      If you have contributed enough of value to Slashdot's discussions that you accumulated karma to imbue ten accounts with mod points, I don't really have a problem letting you make ten moderations in a row.

      You don't have to contribute anything to gain karma. It's about standing out in the crowd.

    32. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Skrapion · · Score: 1

      I know you're trying to be funny, and you succeeded earlier in the thread with your "THREE TIMES" comment, which had me laughing for a good minute, but...

      ...nothing the GP said implied that the evidence was conclusive.

      --
      The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
    33. Re:Epimenides would be proud by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Actually I happen to think you're smarter than you think I think you may think you are. (or something along those lines)
      but for some reason these 'mod points' you people are referring to are foreign to me. ;-)
       

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    34. Re:Epimenides would be proud by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      Ah,
      you made two fatal mistakes (possibly three)
      1) you did not wait till your karma was 'invincible' only 'excellent' to start a flame fest
      2) you did not do what most trolls do and create a trash account for this flame fest
      3) you did something that I can't seem to put my finger on while I wait for my build script to finish... (going on a 16 hour day here)

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    35. Re:Epimenides would be proud by porl · · Score: 1

      just do what i do and browse at -1 then. all you have to do then is ignore the words and numbers to the right of the subject line of each post and you effectively have 'disabled' the mod system, but left it there for those that like to use it.

      porl

    36. Re:Epimenides would be proud by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      All he said was that your comments were funny, he didn't say anything about their content. Learn to take a compliment, sheesh!

      --
      Why not fork?
    37. Re:Epimenides would be proud by SL+Baur · · Score: 1

      ... you effectively have 'disabled' the mod system, but left it there for those that like to use it.

      In a sense, yes. I browse at -1, but still like to see the moderations just as a reference.

      Most, but not all, of the time, -1s deserve to be -1s. It's the handful of exceptions (moderated -1 - I disagree with you, this occurs distressingly often in any Microsoft or Linux related article) that keep me looking at everything.

    38. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    39. Re:Epimenides would be proud by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      Makes me feel guilty for modding that "special" person up once.
      At least I modded him down twice before that :)

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    40. Re:Epimenides would be proud by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I don't know if you understand what's going on here. This is a classic example of the system working. We have a plethora of comments here pointing out that you are not making any kind of logical point in regards to the parent article but merely repeating yourself over and over again. It is all revolving around you making a claim with no kind of logical evidence and other people shouting you down. Given that everything within this thread is put forth as mere opinion with little to none factual content to back it up you are essentially opening yourself up to a vote by the masses without providing anything to support yourself.

      In this case the masses have decided that they are better off making all of the choices rather then some elitist group that supposedly knows better.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  22. Slashdot: What's in a name? by starglider29a · · Score: 1
    Among the many anagrams for Slashdot are these gems:
    1. Ad Sloths
    2. Had Slots
    3. Dash Lost
    4. Lad Hosts
    5. Lad Shots
    6. ADSL Hots
    7. Lads Shot
    8. Sad Sloth
    9. Tad Slosh
    10. Halts Dos
    11. Has Dolts
    12. Old Stash
    13. Sold Shat
    14. Lass Doth (not)
    15. Last Dohs

    If you include "news for nerds stuff that matters" the first 1000 include "salamanders"

  23. wait.. by nimbius · · Score: 2, Funny

    my garden is dirty? i dont follow. is this some soviet code for "please stop using the word shitcock so many times"?

    i wouldnt exactly call what i impart 'wisdom' either...

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  24. Weak faith by AioKits · · Score: 4, Funny

    All I can say is that if your faith is shaken by if someone says fuck (or other profanity of choice) or not, it must be some pretty weak faith.

    On that note: Cock!

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    1. Re:Weak faith by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I can say is that if your faith is shaken by if someone says fuck (or other profanity of choice) or not, it must be some pretty weak faith.

      On that note: Cock!

      Am I the only person who, after reading this, thought that George Carlin would have loved that line?

    2. Re:Weak faith by Surt · · Score: 1

      I think he would love it. George Carlin faked his own fucking death you know.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Weak faith by Atario · · Score: 1

      On that note: Cock!

      Won't work. He can always tell himself you just like mentioning male birds.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    4. Re:Weak faith by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 1

      Shit Piss fuck cunt cocksucker motherfucker...

      Because Carlin said so!

      I got dibs on the TITS! Betcha cant eat just one!

      --
    5. Re:Weak faith by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      James May, is that you?

    6. Re:Weak faith by Zwicky · · Score: 1

      No. He would have asked for permission.

      --
      "Three eyes are better than one" -- Lieutenant Columbo
    7. Re:Weak faith by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      fuck? that's a nothing..

      i was once accused of "cursing" to my shrink's secretary for saying "jesus christ" in response to a schedule screwup which pushed a 30 day maintenance appointment to 60.

      There are people out there with seriously mal-adjusted concepts of language, just like there are real creationists out there (I met one in person, he was a mac user like me, I feel very dirty)

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    8. Re:Weak faith by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are hymen worshippers?

  25. I'm following the money... by hellfire · · Score: 1

    What was it that prompted Slashdot to start posting its hate mail? Was someone clamoring for this?

    I can only guess that posting stuff like this which causes a flurry of messages proclaiming it's stupidity is merely the result of slashdot trying to get more eyeballs on advertisements.

    I come to that conclusion by process of elimination because there is no other intelligent reason for this.

    I mean c'mon! Okay you post duplicate articles, you don't read summaries, and you once let JonKatz sully this site. But cmon! Do you really have any journalistic integrity? If you want to post letters from users, post constructive letters and have a discussion about them, rather than post flamebait.

    The entire "idle" section is horrible, it's not even entertaining. To top it all off, Idle's layout is ugly, and when I post a comment, the comment field is 2 inches wide in the latest version of firefox! Why do I want to see anything here?

    Kill Idle and bury it. For all of those who agree with me, I suggest you go to your preferences and set your content for the Idle section to "none." I'll be blocking the entire section because it seems to be the only way to get thru to the slashdot editors that crap should not be tolerated. This is because if you block the article, you block the ad that comes with it, and that hits home in the pocketbook. Follow the money...

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:I'm following the money... by Lobster+Quadrille · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I come to that conclusion by process of elimination because there is no other intelligent reason for this

      Yeah, because nobody else in the geek community ever posts their hate mail.

      It's funny, entertaining, and it's on idle. Get over it.

      --
      "The cup is in turn designed for holding hot or cold liquids, and has an open rim and closed base." --US Patent #5425497
    2. Re:I'm following the money... by orclevegam · · Score: 1

      There's ads on here? I banished all my ads long ago.

      --
      Curiosity was framed, Ignorance killed the cat.
    3. Re:I'm following the money... by Kelbear · · Score: 2, Funny

      All the internet should follow your shining example. The passion and fire within your breast that you hold for this website should be admired. Finally someone has stepped up to criticize the horrible travesty here.

      Thank you for taking the time to read these idle posting that you hate so much and draft a comment letting everyone know how much you hate these posts you've read.

      Your stirring rhetoric has compelled me to take action and block ads. We'll show the enemy we are not to be trifled with!

    4. Re:I'm following the money... by LarsG · · Score: 1

      Erm.. Maddox and the Piratebay folks at the very least manage to post their hatemail / lawyer nastygrams while being tounge-in-cheek about it. Which is kinda fun and entertaining.

      Samzenpus isn't. Get over it.

      --
      If J.K.R wrote Windows: Puteulanus fenestra mortalis!
  26. Re:It's true, the stuff about the a-holes here by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

    Before you complain about being modded down, let me just say something.

    It isn't about "I'm so clever" it's about courtesy and polite for getting modded into oblivion. Ask 1 of the twitters who lashes out randomly with racism and you'll know why he gets modded that way regardless of what he says.

    Some people only "joke" about being smart. It's a certain type of humor you may or may not understand. But as far as us thinking we are better than you (or anyone else). It's nothing like that 99% of the time.

    So please, have a nice day, and smile champ.

    --
    Disclaimer: I am not god.
    We may not be created equal
    But we can be treated equal.
  27. I've got a gripe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anonymous posters are treated as second class citizens. This is inconsistent with the pro-reason and pro-privacy atmosphere on Slashdot where appeals to authority are (rightly) called out and arguments (rightly) stand on their merits irrespective of the poster's identity. This is especially irritating when both the fervent pro-privacy, pro-free-speech advocate and the anti-anonymous snob are one and the same person.

    Also, cocks.

    1. Re:I've got a gripe. by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

      And ya know what? I personally give AC's the benefit of the doubt and have my personal preferences set to give them +1.

      That's a mixed bag really, IMHO I get 30% more informative/insightful/interesting/funny stuff I might not otherwise get, but I get 70% more crap. Sometimes I debate changing it back but never did...

      --
      ...in bed
    2. Re:I've got a gripe. by nsayer · · Score: 1

      Anonymous posters are treated as second class citizens

      No they're not. They're treated as average. Non-anonymous posters have a history that can be consulted to give them above- or below-average starting visibility. If you consistently post down-modded stuff, your posts will command less attention than AC posts.

  28. I know I can customize by gorrepati · · Score: 1

    But man, that green color in editor's post hurt my eyes. I have to blink for a moment to switch back to code. This is my hatemail. Take that, slashdot. :)

    --
    You will never have experience until after you needed it.
  29. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i came here looking for information about hashpots but YR LUCKY I DIDN'T SEND YOU MONEY.

  30. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's as if all of Digg reached out and touched slashdot in this post. It makes me hurt

  31. I've had it, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sign me for this. Please completely disable my account.

    Signed
    Anonymous

  32. These posts... by mecenday · · Score: 1

    ... are a ploy to get more people to sign up for accounts so that they can block idle content from the main page.

    --
    Tautologies, they are what they are.
  33. What I want to know is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's a "mind body"?

    Also, please stop with this "Disagree Mail" crap. Idle is already the short bus of the interwebs, don't make it any worse than it already is.

  34. SlapShot? by Ummite · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think the guy talk about slapshot (the hockey guy).

    Very disturbing indeed!

    1. Re:SlapShot? by ishmalius · · Score: 1

      Beat me to it. And I thought I was the only one to get the joke. ^^

  35. GET A NEW IDLE THEME! by LordKaT · · Score: 1

    Get a new Idle Theme!

  36. Re:Icon looks like a stick and puck? by thejuggler · · Score: 1

    If you squint enough and after drinking through 2.5 periods of a Detriot Redwings vs. Minnesota Wild playoff game 5.

    BTW: The icon could also look like Lacrosse or golf. Get ready for hate mail from those fans also.

    And he did not read the tag line "news for nerds"?

  37. Hmmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just realised that the white-on-green colour scheme used for the story is immensely more pleasant to look at, when seriously stoned, than the black-on-white colour scheme commonly used by /.

    Is there any way to personalise / modify the css used when displaying /. ?

    - I'd like it white-on-green, pleeeze.

    1. Re:Hmmmm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree; on every listed point.

  38. Re:Slashdot? Hockey? by subsoniq · · Score: 1

    Please ignore the mullet headed, cheap beer swilling hockey fan. His parents dove into the shallow end of the gene pool, obviously, and he does not represent all hockey fans.

  39. Keep it coming by Hy-teq · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a great series. Please continue Disagree Mail.

  40. Juvenile and unprofessional by Zadaz · · Score: 1

    I'll post it here publicly saving them the step of pasting an email into an idle post for public ridicule:

    The weekly "Lookie who dum everyone else is!" column is sad. Sure, these people aren't your core audience (obviously) but going out of your way to hold people up for ridicule and abuse when they've done nothing but be ignorant (At worst) is juvenile. But as a feature with the full blessing of the parent company is beyond unprofessional, it's just disgusting.

    I know that a large part of Slashdot culture is holding the ignorant up to the cleansing flame of truth and then having decades long flame wars with ourselves about "truth" but it's exactly this part of the culture that we need to shed if IT professionals want to shake the stereotype of being socially stunted. (By, you know, not acting like we're socially stunted.)

  41. This Rank Garden... by eagee · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    "The filth you are tending in this rank garden" That is such a great quote. It makes me think of the right wing political process.

    1. Re:This Rank Garden... by SparkleMotion88 · · Score: 1

      "This Rank Garden" -- sounds like a 90s post-grunge band.

  42. my impression of you by spazdor · · Score: 5, Funny

    COME ON MODS, FIGHT ME YOU FAGGOTS

    What? Trying to pick a fight? Moi? Clearly you have no idea what picking a fight means, YOU DAMN FAGGOTS

    --
    DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    1. Re:my impression of you by Kesch · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only sensible mod for this post would be -1 Troll, +6 Underrated. Thus achieving the holy grail of +5 troll.

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
    2. Re:my impression of you by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I am so saving this entire thread. 4chan would be proud of /. today.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  43. I'm beggining to hate it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because there is only one point of view-Americans and yet that majority thinks its 'objective' 'scientific', blablabla

  44. for the love of god by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    keep this idle shit off of the main page!

  45. visual relief by bperkins · · Score: 2, Informative


    // ==UserScript==
    // @name           slashdot
    // @namespace      foo
    // @description    unscewup idle
    // @include        http://idle.slashdot.org/
    // ==/UserScript==

    var a, thisdomain, links;
    links = document.getElementsByTagName('div');
    for (var i = 0; i < links.length; i++) {
        a = links[i];

        if (a.getAttribute("class") == "head"   ) {

           a.style.backgroundColor = 'white';
           a.style.color = 'black';
        }

        if (a.getAttribute("class") == "details"   ) {

           a.style.color = 'black';
        }

        if (a.getAttribute("class") == "body"   ) {

           a.style.color = 'black';
           a.style.fontSize = "100%";
        }

    }

    Seems to work for now.
    YMMV.

  46. Two Questions by DougF · · Score: 0

    First: People send money to websites? Maybe that's why my Karma is "bad", who do I send the check to? Second: Is that picture of the fat mailman a slashdot editor in costume or a generic postal pic?

    --
    Impetuous! Homeric!
  47. Plants by 32771 · · Score: 1

    I just find him great: "...because of the filth you are tending in this rank garden". I might not agree with him, but the particular green at the top of the page reminds me of certain jungle plants which grow in deep shade and have developed a similar hue. Also they show a metallic luster which comes from certain crystals they are growing to gather even more light. I just can't find any - oh wait it is on google books: "Vegetation-climate Interaction", Jonathan Adams, Ning Zeng. On page 89 you will find something about Begonia leaves being blueish green and iridescent and living on the rain forest floor.

    http://books.google.com/books?id=NMgirQi1oDMC&printsec=frontcover&dq=vegetation+climate&sig=ACfU3U2YZnCT2_M7jfZLZElOzEZ9ljgm8w#PPA89,M1

    I wonder what the odd id in the link means, but appart from this it is a nice introductory book about plant-climate interaction.

    Well, living on the forest floor gives plants a lot of access to the fumes of decaying matter from the canopy above and also to much higher CO_2 levels. I don't know whether this says anything about Slashdot but with some suspension of disbelief one might find some truth in his statement.

    I mean, I admire these plants living with all these hardships - low light, the stink. I just hope they make good use of the CO_2.

    --
    Je me souviens.
  48. Filter it out if you don't like it by GregGardner · · Score: 1

    Please, just go here:

    http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=edithome

    And under the section labeled "Customize Stories on the Homepage", click on the radio button to the right of "Idle" that is under the NOT sign (red circle with a slash through it) and then click on the Submit button at the bottom.

    Then Idle stories will no longer show up on the homepage for you and then you can stop whining about them.

    It's all about personal selective filtering rather than system-wide censorship, something that most Slashdot users should be able to understand.

  49. I came here to learn about hockey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What does 'hockey' mean? A new scripting language? A state-of-the-art GPU?

  50. "Women, children, and people of faith" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's with the guy who thinks women and children are incapable of faith? Oh well, to each his own.

    How about on idle, you post all the hate mail about idle. All of it. I'm sure there's not that much, right? I mean, you wouldn't keep a section going if it were almost universally reviled. I mean, not like it gets tagged "idleispants" "pleasestop" "noonelikesthis" etc. right?

  51. Complaining about profanity on slashdot by geekoid · · Score: 1, Troll

    is like complaining about pee in a public pool.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  52. Re:Slashdot? Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry about this guy. He also complained to MicroSoft when he was unable to find any information about his erectile dysfunction at their site.

  53. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  54. bitches aint shit by greengod · · Score: 0

    i think profanity is a personal choice, if you wanna use it have at. you can still be tactful and make a good point using it. granted you can also be a fucking moron. it just depends on the context... and i especially don't like elitism. and you're pretty elitist if you don't like people that swear, that's discriminatory, and to say that this is a niche website, i work for a general contractor. you've got a lot of diversities. dirty mexicans, cool mexicans, dumb fat white people, cool fat white people (jk, kinda). all around it just depends on your company. my boss has been with the company 16 years and he's rigged his work truck with an HHO module and is getting awesome gas mileage, plus researching to build himself a magnetic motor or something that works better. it's very cool. then i know people who are just stupid assholes... just put up with everything and get over yourself. welcome to the new world.

  55. And the moral of the story is... by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    If you don't like the profanity on Slashdot, go dig a big hole in your backyard and fill it with water...

    Or something.

  56. That's not filth... that's manure. by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    It makes this rank garden more fertile.

  57. Women and Children? by CapnYarrrrrr · · Score: 1

    Women, children and people of faith will never be able to learn what you have to impart because of the filth you are tending in this rank garden.

    I'm a woman, you fucking insensitive clod!

  58. Was that a straight NOT operation? by ElboRuum · · Score: 1

    Or is it a misapplication of DeMorgan's theorem?

    I can never seem to tell these days.

    Now get off my lawn!

  59. Re:LOL by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    No there is no one making some wild connection George Bush out of no where.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  60. Whine tags by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I first saw this earlier, I managed to get in BEFORE the auto whine-tag scripts (pleasestop, idleispants, whinewhineihatelevityboohoo, etc) the haters have running had a chance to tag up. Seriously, you guys are getting slow.

  61. I tend to agree by cjhanson · · Score: 1

    As much as I love slashdot to keep me in the "now", I have noticed it is kind-of a good-ol'-boys-club.

    "Slashdot's moderating system is total bullshit and the admins are retards for still keeping it around. Nearly every downmodding that occurs on Slashdot is 100% invalid."

    *** And that person gets a -1? For having an opinion? ***

    "Including the -1 you just got? ;)"

    *** And that person gets a 5? He's probably the douche that -1'd the first guy. ***

    While I like the format of the news I receive here, the implementation of the commenting system leaves MUCH to be desired. I can easily see how it'd piss people off. (mostly people that need to get out more, but still)

    Oh, and yes, go nuts flaming me with "comments" (which is about all it is, and it's lucky to qualify as a comment in most cases, unfortunately). You're comment will be +5 and mine will be -1. Luckily, even if NASA devoted all their employed brain-power for an entire year, I still don't think we could find a way for me to give a fuck less.

    Unfortunately, it would seem many of these "slashdotters" seem to gain personal validation by being having "popular" comments.

    But my opinion aside... exactly how is the moderation system adding value to this site or anyone's lives?

    No really? Serious question!

    1. Re:I tend to agree by Deadstick · · Score: 1
      "Including the -1 you just got? ;)"

      *** And that person gets a 5? He's probably the douche that -1'd the first guy. ***

      Ummm, no. Slashdot's moderating system doesn't permit that.

      rj

    2. Re:I tend to agree by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Except for the huge number of lusers who have multiple accounts so they can mod-stalk and mod-troll.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    3. Re:I tend to agree by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      Just call me Candide, I guess...

      rj

    4. Re:I tend to agree by u38cg · · Score: 1
      Either a sophisticated troll, or you really don't get it.

      I gave up mod points in this thread to reply to you, and I was going to use them to mod up every single "Please stop" post I could find.

      When I have mod points on /., I don't look at the posters name, sig, UID, or anything else. Just what he wrote. If it's insightful, it gets modded +1, Insightful. I very rarely mod down unless something is being sockpuppeted or abused, or is just patently bad. So get off your high horse about the moderation system and take a long, hard look at the comments you actually post.

      And as for how it adds value? Just about every thread has maybe half a dozen comments that are far more valuable than the original news item. Those six posts are the ones I want to see, not the sea of garbage posted by noobs like yourself. I only saw your post today because I drop my threshold when I'm moderating.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    5. Re:I tend to agree by cjhanson · · Score: 1

      Hrm. Well, honestly I haven't been on this site long, and I'll be the first to admit that I really don't think that I have added anything "valuable" to the site.. yet anyway. So yay, I'm probably no better than 99% of the people on this site. However I don't go around calling people noobs and generally being a dick so I know I am adding more value than at least one user. So yeah, thanks for giving up mod points just to be a dick. It's really a growing trend and we're really happy to see that you've jumped right on board. Why make things better when you can make things worse? Better yet, let's go around calling every new person who wasn't quit gotten into the slashdot-groove a n00b. Now there's a term I can stand behind! noob. It says "I am smarter than you" and "new people aren't welcome here". How is calling people a noob adding value? Nevermind. Thanks to the other posters who did answer my question.

    6. Re:I tend to agree by u38cg · · Score: 1
      How is calling people a noob adding value? Because if you didn't realise that's how you came across, you had the opportunity to think about what you say and how you say it and change your ways. Instead, you've behaved like a spoilt child and ignored what I was trying to tell you.

      I didn't post that comment for anybody else's benefit than yours. Listen to me carefully. On slashdot, and on many places on the internet, who you are counts for absolutely nothing. It has nothing to do with the "slashdot-groove". If your comment wasn't +1, Insightful, then fuck off and don't waste mine or anybody else's time with whining about the "good ol' boys club". Come back when you have something worth saying. "The implementation of the comment system leaves much to be desired"...the comment system is the way it is for a damn good reason, which if you hang around for a while you might understand. It's not perfect, but come up with a better one and we'd be delighted to hear about it. You might even get a +1, Interesting.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    7. Re:I tend to agree by cjhanson · · Score: 1

      Okay, so I'm confused. I'm actually far from a "noob", whether that's how I come across or not doesn't matter to me. Especially when you're telling me that who I am counts for nothing. So you gave up mod points to take the oppurtunity to show me the errors of my ways so that I can come across better because who I am counts for nothing. Had you actually read my post you would realize I was just confirming that I do see how someone might think that. And in a thread dedicated to those who DO whine about slashdot no less. So hey, while I did listen to you VERY carefully, I still come away with the feeling that you're just a total dick. Didn't I end the exchange by saying "Nevermind"? Thanks for the unsolicited advise.. I think I'll stick with my own views though. Seems less douchey.

  62. No Hockey? by genner · · Score: 5, Funny

    I never notcied this before but he's right. There's not nearly enough hockey on this site.

    1. Re:No Hockey? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never notcied this before but he's right.
      There's not nearly enough hockey on this site.

      Amen

    2. Re:No Hockey? by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      "I never notcied this before but he's right. There's not nearly enough hockey on this site."

      That's strange, because I see lots of pointless fights on here.

    3. Re:No Hockey? by archieaa · · Score: 1

      Go Wings Eh!

  63. I think this is the reason for the confusion: by default+luser · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Am I the only person that had the sudden urge to register hockeydot.org and have it redirect to Slashdot?

    Check this out: Hockeydot.net.

    Yeah, I know, slashDOT, hockeyDOT...right. It's a weak connection, but the sender was a weak idiot. I would expect this kind of stupid logic from a person like him.

    --

    Man is the animal that laughs.
    And occasionally whores for Karma.

  64. Right On by tobiah · · Score: 1

    There is no bad publicity

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  65. Idiot, or the best troll ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are an arrogant little prick with a superiority complex. Everyone here is saying you deserve what you are getting. We are the moderators. We choose to moderate you down because you are an ass and an idiot. The only argument that I can see that the system isn't working is that you weren't slapped down harder and faster, and we all had to read more of your brain farts than any sane person would want to. You aren't as smart as you think you are. You aren't funny. You aren't insightful. No one agrees with you. You are an outcast with no social skills even among outcasts with poor social skills.

    Either that or you are a truly brilliant troll.

    1. Re:Idiot, or the best troll ever? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You are an outcast with no social skills even among outcasts with poor social skills."

      I think I broke something laughing at that.

  66. Quality Concerns and a Suggestion by Valarauk · · Score: 1

    While I very seldom post to this site I do enjoy following it closely for both the news and the unusually high quality of many posts. That being said, I've found the recent inclusion of idle material into the main page to be disconcerting in the extreme. The fact that slashdot boasts a robust filtering system isn't enough on it's own to justify the repeated posting of material that fails to inform, inspire, or otherwise positively influence anything. I think many of the development staff's goals behind idle's inclusion in the main stream might be better addressed through a slashdot blog or somesuch (i.e. just how much crap the mod staff is regularly subjected too). If the goal was purely to break into the intertube's massive lolcat/political rant market, I think the slashdot team needs to understand that they will be sacrificing what has become a very respected position in the web community. As it stands now, I would be less likely to refer a collegue to check out slashdot as a news source, simply because worrying about their reading "cocsuckers" in the first story they might happen accross isn't something I'm going to subject myself too.

    --
    **insert favorite profound quotation here**
  67. +1 by yeahthisisrob · · Score: 1

    I find the disagree mail interesting, I'm surprised that it's been so poorly received by the 'community'. Placed in quotes because I fall into the group that occasionally visits slashdot and almost never leaves comments. (This might be my first.) It would be nice to read the section without all the redundant (ha! slashdot word used +1) complaining about a complaints section.

    1. Re:+1 by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      The "community" that has so poorly received the disagree mail is afraid of possibly ending up on it or some other mocking post.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  68. Didn't Bungie Do This First? by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    Bungie started posting the funny emails they get from people who get banned from Halo 2 and 3. Some were just sad, because if they were really how the person thinks, then I imagine that going through life is pretty difficult for them. I feel the same for some of these. It's amazing how sensitive of creatures we are.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
    1. Re:Didn't Bungie Do This First? by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Bungie had an abusively funny Letters to the Webmaster section as far back as 1994 or 1995. This is nothing new at all.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  69. Mental? by grassy_knoll · · Score: 1

    What... really?

    I've been doing it wrong all this time?

  70. This is all we need to do? by fermion · · Score: 1

    So all we need to do to get rid of the superstitious zealots who tell me that I am going to hell because I recite a incantation, or that I am going to hell because I will not believe that that contradicts my own senses, or I am going to hell because I have enough faith to believe in the great unknown and the probably known is use more profanity? Shit ya'. I am so fucking in.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  71. You know what I like best about "Disagree Mail"? by pongo000 · · Score: 1

    The comments! Hell, I don't even RTFP. I just skip right to what you all post, and I just fall over in gales of gut-wrenching laughter. I'm serious. In fact, I bet there could be no e-mails posted, and you guys would rock the house with your comments!

    (Really. I'm serious!)

  72. Dear writer with a good clean life by HikingStick · · Score: 0

    On Tue, 13 May 2008 ******* wrote:

    "I try to live a good clean life by learning all I can and nurturing my body and spirit. I'm afraid that I will not be able to become part of your community as I find it sick. Sick in mind body and soul. Why your people deem it necessary to use the language that they do I can never understand. Women, children and people of faith will never be able to learn what you have to impart because of the filth you are tending in this rank garden. Please stop sending me email."

    I know there's a good chance that you'll never read this, because of all the filth you see around it, but I must write it. I don't know what faith you claim, but it seems as if it is only for those who are good enough. I guess it would be wrong for you to walk on the streets without soundproof earplugs, because someone might drop an f-bomb in your vicinity. I also guess you must keep your eyes closed most of the time, so you don't accidentally see something evocative or inappropriate.

    I, too, am a person of faith, but my faith does not teach me to hide away from those who act in ways that do not align with my beliefs. On the contrary, my faith teaches me that I am to be a light in a dark world, by living the life that God has given me in a manner that is grateful to him for all he has done for me. My faith teaches that God has adopted me as a son because I trust him and accept they payment he made for my very life. As a son, I am grateful. Yet I also understand that those who have not yet accepted his gift, which leads to adoption, cannot be expected to live by the same standard to which I have been called to live. In fact, the messiah himself, when self-righteous religious leaders asked why he hung out with drunks and prostitutes, replied by saying that healthy people don't need a physician (telling them, indirectly, that they, who claimed to be righteous, did not need him while those "sinners" around him needed him there).

    If you truly are a person who is carrying the light of God, why would you not want to be part of this community? Don't you believe that they need to hear his message? I don't expect my peers in the technology field to share my desire to keep my communications clean, because they do not share my faith. I hope that my interactions with them--a group of intelligent, witty, and (usually) well-meaning people--will help to demonstrate that not all people who claim the name of Christ, the messiah, feel it is their purpose on this earth to beat them over the head with doctrine, accusations, and slurs. I hope that in some way, someone will see my witness here (or on the other sites you likely would also consider "sick in mind body and soul") and say, "Wow, there's one of those Christian nut-jobs who isn't like the others I've encountered...I wonder if there really could be something to what he believes."

    And yes, I know that making these comments here are likely to open me and my beliefs up to criticism and open disdain, but I will not be ashamed of the good news that I have received: that Jesus (Y'shua), the Christ, who though innocent of any wrongdoing, suffered execution in the place of me and all of mankind to appease the wrath of God (for God is both just and loving), so that we could be reconciled with God, and was vindicated when he was raised from death to life, so that all who believe this good news and in faith turn away from their sins and toward a loving God will also partake in that resurrection and be heirs of life without end in the presence of God. This I believe, regardless of how much anyone else derides me or my Lord. Yet I will not look upon those who will respond in such a way as horrible people, or people deserving of God's anger. Rather, I see them as people in need of mercy and grace--people who do not realize the depth of God's love for them, and for whom I can only hope for the best. ~HikingStick~

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
    1. Re:Dear writer with a good clean life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no god mwahahahahahahaha

  73. Not redirected yet by tobiah · · Score: 1

    If the redirect is in place I'm not seeing it. I know DNS info takes awhile to propagate, but I've found Godaddy get the word around pretty quick. I'll check a bit later. If someone knows a public dns server that has picked this up perhaps you can post it here.

    --
    "The ability to delude yourself may be an important survival tool" - Jane Wagner -
  74. ONLY THREE? by alexborges · · Score: 1

    WTF!

    I actually thought it would be fun to laugh about the whiners that want out (hint: quit coming here guys), but you only post three?

    What a waste of time to waste my time in such an ineffective manner!

    --
    NO SIG
  75. Today's thought... by tekiegreg · · Score: 1

    As far as canceling ID's go, why not? My suggestion to Slashdot for a feature would be just that, a feature that lets a user say "I've had it" and turns in and cancels their user number, that number will consequently be allowed re-assignment to the next Slashdot user that comes along, might give me a shot at a 2,3,4 or 5 digit user ID someday :-)

    Actually if Slashdot was feeling capitalist, maybe detect if that ID is 2,3,4 or 5 digits and offer them for sale using a price that's dependent on the number itself (lower or "cool" numbers such as 666 or 1234 go for higher prices...)

    --
    ...in bed
  76. Hockey with Godot by RCanine · · Score: 1

    I came here to learn about hockey and there is no hockey to be found.

    Really, he is just expressing his existential angst. Aren't we all going somewhere to learn about hockey in our own way? Yet we wander about in lonely, unfriendly desolation.

    No sir, you are not just some idiot. You are the quintessential idiot that represents humanity's great mortal struggle with meaninglessness.

  77. I'm not profane by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    I think it's broken, and I have excellent karma. On the other hand I am an anarchist, so I think every authoritarian system is "broken".

  78. Netiquette! by redelm · · Score: 1
    samezenpus ought to know better: posting private email is a violation of netiquette. And copyright, however depracated that might be around here. Since slashdot does not have a "Letters to the Editurd" section, emailers would have no expectation their mail would be posted.

    Beyond that, I fail to see anything remarkable in the alleged "hate mail". They represent very legitimate points-of-view even if we do not share them. In all, I see this as a feeble attempt to push hitcount.

    On the plus side, it is good to see the editors faithfully reflect their audience: they can be slashtards too!

  79. Re:Slashdot? Hockey? by jonadab · · Score: 1

    > he does not represent all hockey fans

    I'm sure most other hockey fans are probably much more intelligent. Maybe even all eight of you.

    I mean, seriously, *hockey*? What next, beach lacrosse? Full-contact fly fishing? Jai alai? World championship fooseball? Intramural underwater pole vaulting? Indoor soccer?

    I wouldn't even bet money (without checking) that there'd be information about hockey on hockey.com, much less on slashdot.org.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  80. Slash Dot Dash by DVega · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute!! Isn't this site a Fatboy Slim fan forum ?

    --
    MOD THE CHILD UP!
  81. wait a sec. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeh, I can understand. I was equally pissed when I discovered that I wasn't able to order pipes on youtube...

  82. i, too came for the hockey by mistahkurtz · · Score: 1

    but i stayed for the women and booze (clearly)

    --
    not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
    1. Re:i, too came for the hockey by mistahkurtz · · Score: 1

      ...err...make that foul languange and discrimination...

      --
      not only is time travel possible, it's irrelevant.
  83. What's the hockey whiner going on about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I don't know of any specific hockey discussions, I remember a hot figure skating/ice dancing gripefest during the run up to the Olympics. With a group as eclectic as this, hockey is bound to come up sometime. After all if a million monkeys can write Shakespeare....thousands of Slashdotters can say something about the NHL.

  84. Re:LOL by Skrapion · · Score: 1

    Wait... what? You're saying these emails weren't sent by George?

    --
    The details are trivial and useless; The reasons, as always, purely human ones.
  85. very scientific by uniquegeek · · Score: 1

    This thread is an Escher thread.

    Except for all you retards who aren't geeky enough to know who Escher was.

  86. Re:Icon looks like a stick and puck? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Lacrosse, yes. Golf, no. With a golf club, the face is slanted the other way ie ( \. instead of /.)

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  87. And your point is? by deltacephei · · Score: 1

    It's news for nerds! It's entertainment! It's both!

    You're confusing desire for a higher ideal and the gutter reality of human nature. So what the parent company has blessed this? Since when is Slashdot some sort of flagship for proper behavior or even known outside of the tech crowd? It's their company, they can do what they want and the market will reward actions accordingly. Maybe they compiled statistics showing how popular the competition is for funny modded posts. And last I checked a clear percentage of tech people are socially stunted, part of the mass appeal to come here. (Cough, cough, not me of course)

    How are people being abused? There's a hot button word - I fail to see how ending up as fodder for what is clearly meant as satire qualifies as abuse. Humor is often all about ridicule, stupidity, and yes, quite often completely juvenile behavior, whether or not it's fair or mature is beside the point. Hence movies like Dodge Ball, a true pinnacle of achievement, get made and make money.

    I would love to see this same profiling done for comments posted to my local TV news website. It's truly scary to see what people post: someone has a horrible freeway accident and a commenter posts something to the effect of 'hell yes, cool, a dead person, he deserved it because my microsecond skim of a sensationally covered news item suggests it to me'.

  88. The first one I liked by cornjchob · · Score: 1

    So far, the rest of these blew. This one had me laughing.

    --
    We now have confirmed reports from an informed Orange County minister that Ethel is still an active communist.
  89. Re:You know what I like best about "Disagree Mail" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I understand completely. During discussions like this, I wonder if the people on here that are at each other's throats with trolls and flames abound, is that it makes for some really great 'idle' reading material. The system works.

  90. This thread runs out of mod points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    anything sensefull to say not needed

  91. Why are these on the front page? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has jumped the shark.

  92. the new Hockeydot.org logo by haqatak · · Score: 1

    . _/
    Perhaps ./ isnt't the bestest place to figure out what hockey and slashdot got in common?

  93. Nah - he spelled it wrong... by foxylad · · Score: 1

    ...what he really meant was that there wasn't enough hokey.

    He must have hit Slashdot on a good day.

    --
    Do as you would be done to.