Slashdot Mirror


"Smash Your Hard Drive" To Fight Identity Theft

Will Do This For Free writes "BBC News has a story about the only fireproof way of safeguarding your personal information when dumping your old computer: 'It sounds extreme, but the only way to be 100% safe is to smash your hard drive into smithereens. [...] The more thoroughly the better.' This sounds like so much fun that I almost feel like doing it right now. Let me press Submit Story first."

527 comments

  1. "The only fireproof way of safeguarding your data" by thetorpedodog · · Score: 5, Funny

    So...I don't want my data to somehow magically be restored when I throw an old hard disk into a fire? Where can I read more about this amazing data-recovery technology?

    --
    This sig is certified free of self-referential humour!
  2. Nuke it from space by Atriqus · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...It's the only way to be sure.

    --
    Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    1. Re:Nuke it from space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The quote is, "Take off and nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure".

      But you could also use a cutting torch & just melt it into slag.

      If you have a ceramic mold, you could even make a trashy little knick-knack out of it, paint it up like a goose & hang it in your kitchen!

    2. Re:Nuke it from space by Atriqus · · Score: 1

      Who says I was quoting?

      Like most comments on slashdot, that was a completely original thought.

      --
      Hey, look! It's Bono's brother.
    3. Re:Nuke it from space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With Rare Earth Neodymium Magnets.

    4. Re:Nuke it from space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey hold on one second... this hard drive has a substantial dollar value attached to it!

    5. Re:Nuke it from space by nevillethedevil · · Score: 1

      "Fuckin' Hey"

      --
      Be gone from my sight or prepare to feel my flaming wraith!
    6. Re:Nuke it from space by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Joking? I hope so...

      I say you were quoting. You were quoting the movie "Aliens".

      The person who replied to you provided the precise quote from the film. It was on the subject of how to deal with the alien threat on the planet. Whether you know that's where it came from or not that is what you were referencing.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  3. In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In other news: sky still blue, water still wet, pope still catholic.

    1. Re:In other news by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Informative

      In other news: people still stupid. Has anyone here actually TRIED to get stuff back off a Guttmann wiped drive? Or even a DoD 7 wiped drive?

      My class in computer security had some time to kill and someone brought that up so the teacher said "Well, we've got a bunch of PCs from last upgrade waiting to be re-imaged and given away to students...let me see what I can score us!". He ended up getting us a half a dozen PCs set up in the back of the class with 2 HDDs set up in each so we could run plenty of different tests. We did everything from MSFT format to one pass to three pass to DoD 7 to Guttman. We researched and then used every piece of freeware and trialware that we could get our little hands on. Here is our findings:

      MSFT format is of course pointless, as everyone knows. 1 pass of zeroes we got around,sorry but it has been awhile, but we got around 80% IIRC. 3 pass was lower(0,1,random), somewhere in the 10-20% range, depending on the software used, but most of the "recovered" data was garbled beyond use, DoD-7 made it pretty much impossible, I think we got 2 .txt files and they were so garbled we couldn't decide if it had actually recovered ANYTHING, certainly nothing you could use, and finally Guttmann we got squat.

      So if someone were to spend the $$$$ to have the drive taken apart in a clean room and analyzed and you only used one or two pass of predictable patterns then yeah, I might see wanting to destroy. But I haven't seen anyone bragging about beating D0D-7 with what the average hacker would have access to, much less Guttmann. So frankly unless someone here has a citation I have to call bullshit. Frankly it makes me wonder if this kind of stuff isn't cooked up by the HDD manufacturers. I can just imagine them spinning this- "Before giving away that machine destroy the hard drive first!(so they'll have to buy a new one from us! Yay!)"

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:In other news by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hard drives are cheap. If you have any data that you absolutely don't want to get out...EVER...physical destruction is the 100% solution.

      And, in terms of practicality, running DoD-7 takes about 1000 times longer than whipping out the old Sledge-O-Matic. If you're retiring a few dozen computers, even that gets old, and you start looking for the thermite.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:In other news by D3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are spot on and I would mod you up if I had points. I don't think the HDD manufacturers are behind this though. The simpler (and I think correct) reason is that older media used to be easier to recover data from. Newer hardware is different and the old methods do not apply. http://shsc.info/DataRecovery#titelanker5

      --
      Do really dense people warp space more than others?
    4. Re:In other news by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem is that modern hard drives do automatic defect mapping. The end result is that sometimes important data can be written to a sector, and then the drive will decide that sector is unreliable and map it out. That sector can no longer be accessed in any way. As a result you have a sector which contains data but cannot be wiped because the drive won't let you write there.

      Flash memory is even worse since it does write balancing between all cells to PREVENT a failure of a sector, rather than deciding a sector is on its way out and mapping around it then.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    5. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1 pass of zeroes we got around,sorry but it has been awhile, but we got around 80% IIRC.

      OK, I'm impressed. Would you care to explain in more detail how you did that? From your description, you used "every piece of freeware and trialware that we could get our little hands on". I haven't heard of any software solution that can recover overwritten data.

    6. Re:In other news by squoozer · · Score: 0

      Forget thermite (unless it's for fun) a couple of hours at 200 deg C should do the trick. Not sure I'd want to use the oven for cooking afterwards though. I wonder if whacking the drive in a microwave for a couple of minutes would do the trick?

      --
      I used to have a better sig but it broke.
    7. Re:In other news by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well if you can't access it in any way, then why would it matter? Remember, what folks are afraid of is some hacker will get their CC numbers or some business will end up with a lawsuit because the hackers got everyone's social off their old machine. But I have yet to see anyone actually pull anything useful off without going clean room, which frankly is so crazy expensive that no hacker in his right mind would bother. And for the poster that said it would take too long? You do know there are free programs like this that can boot off CD and do the job for you, right? Hell I bet the FLOSS guys have a nice CD that you can stick in that is simple to script. Simply write a script, burn the disc, and then set the headless machine in the corner.

      And finally let us not forget that in this economic downturn that many machines being tossed by enterprise and SMBs as "junk" could be given a new lease on life and help those that have not been as fortunate as us. I repair and give away machines from businesses and you would be surprised what even a 400MHz P2 can do for those that have none. I have turned a 233MHz into a bookkeeping appliance for a little church who helps out families, the homeless, and migrant workers by installing Puppy Linux with OO.o and some simple Dbases set up. Once shown how the wife of the pastor makes her own databases using the wizard and uses them to track donations, make mailing lists, help with inventory, etc. I have given a 400MHz to a single mom who cried because she now had a way to help her kids with homework and thanks to that donation would have something nice to give her kids for Xmas, and I have set up a group of old 350-600MHz along with an old 700MHz donated server I was able to talk the school out of for a class project on networking for a shelter for battered women. They use them to teach office skills to the women to help them become self sustaining and the server reimages them and does backups on the ones we gave the office workers.

      So while the cost of a new HDD might not be a big deal for most of us, for them it could have hurt. I tell all of those that are nice enough to donate that I will DoD-7 wipe the HDD, which for the smaller drives in older machines really doesn't take long. And of course now that IDE drives are no longer being made they will probably end up more expensive which will make it even harder for somebody who doesn't have much to begin with to afford one. I figure it is better for the environment as well as my heart to take a little time and sit a PC in the corner and run DoD-7 than it is to just see it end up as more e-waste polluting our landfills. Don't you?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In other news: people still stupid. Has anyone here actually TRIED to get stuff back off a Guttmann wiped drive? Or even a DoD 7 wiped drive?

      Or simply zeroed out drive. I'm relatively certain you can read just about as little out of that as from one that's been properly wiped 473 times over and over with maximally uncorrelated patterns of various kinds.
      What you are overlooking however, is that copies of important sectors might not get overwritten AT ALL. Your totally secure 256-bit random AES key to all things confidential might just have been laying around on a "bad" sector that the drive helpfully relocated somewhere else and refuses to overwrite no matter what.

    9. Re:In other news by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Closet redneck that I am, I usually just make a big pile of wood, drives, old backup tapes, and add gasoline. You can pass the melting point of lead in a wood fire, easy.

      The waste is an issue though. I wouldn't want to eat out of the oven either, and I'm not too keen on breathing/cleaning up drive slag either.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    10. Re:In other news by n9891q · · Score: 1

      I am supposed to be reassured because a few undergrads with time to kill were unable to read a couple of disks? What exactly does this say about someone well-funded and determined? Physical destruction is your friend. Get out a hammer and a butane torch.

    11. Re:In other news by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Disclaimer: I work in an industry where we DO worry about people taking drives to the clean room...

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    12. Re:In other news by geekoid · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your not doing it correctly:
      Hint: Use an O Scope.

      Your college free wares tools are probably 2 generations behind the NSA; which is to be expected due to your limited computer power.

      Remove platters, breaks mix with magnets.
      You can put off pieces from a broken disk..even a shattered disk. it only takes time, and some governments would be more then happy top spend resource reconstructing a different nations disk for a chance it might be valuable.

      Security is not a door, it's a fence. You need to determine how high of a fence you want someone to climb in order to get in.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How the parent got modded informative is beyond me. He doesn't answer any of the following questions: What year was this, and what was the software used to recover the data? And what was the software used to wipe the data? And was it a full disk wipe or just a file wipe?

    14. Re:In other news by snowraver1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      microwave for a couple of minutes would do the trick?

      Unlikely. Your HDD has a metal case that would keep the microwaves from penetrating to the platters. If you were to put it in the microwave, you would likely get some sparking/smoking from the controller board, but the acutal platters likely wouldn't even get warm.

      But dont take my word for it, try it! Your work has a microwave, no? Or just watch this crappy video on YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRU7yEEgRaw

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    15. Re:In other news by Peter+van+Hooft · · Score: 1

      While it may be true that older media are easier to recover data from, we mustn't forget that modern hard drives remap bad sectors. You cannot get to the remapped sectors from your OS, so you can't overwrite those. Therefore, there is a probability that classified, readable information exists on a hard disk drive if you have the proper tools. Physically destroying the disk is thus called for.

    16. Re:In other news by Peter+van+Hooft · · Score: 1

      You put it more eloquently than I could possibly do. Thanks.

    17. Re:In other news by gknoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well if you can't access it in any way, then why would it matter?

      The drive's firmware is what keeps track of where the "good" and "bad" sectors are on the drive. Presumably, if you took the platters out, and put them in a different drive, it would have no idea which were the good or bad sectors, and therefore WOULD let you read those sectors. No guarantees that what it reads was what was originally there, but I'd be surprised if it didn't let you read them.

    18. Re:In other news by ApproachingLinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      is it possible to write a utility that tells the drive to map ALL sectors as unreliable ? either as an alternative to thorough wiping or as a final step ? how hard is it to tell a hard drive that a sector that it mapped out is now reliable ?

    19. Re:In other news by citizenr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 pass of zeroes we got around, but we got around 80% IIRC. 3 pass was lower(0,1,random), somewhere in the 10-20% range, depending on the software used, but most of the "recovered" data was garbled beyond use

      I call BS, how exactly were you able to recover OVERWRITTEN data with a software only solution?

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    20. Re:In other news by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      Well this is why you use something like LUKS. The key storage is carefully mapped out to prevent defect mapping (or rather make it very unlikely) and the rest of the drive is encrypted.

      So even if they manage to grab an entire block, a single bitflip anywhere would render the contents unusable if you're using a proper chaining algorithm.

      Of course if you're actually concerned about the cleanroom as I see from your post below, then maybe helping starving orphans help the Soviets isn't worth the risk of doing so;)

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    21. Re:In other news by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Never forget the Thermite, because it's always fun.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    22. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Automatic defect mapping is not that automatic. After detecting the sector as defective, it needs to be written with zeroes before actual mapping happends. Not 100% sure if that is the case with all drives though.

      Not to mention most of the drives support SMART, so one can query them if any sectors have been marked as bad (and mapped)

    23. Re:In other news by MoonBuggy · · Score: 2, Funny

      And thus hopefully an organisation who doesn't take your security procedures from BBC articles and 'Which?' magazine...

    24. Re:In other news by martinQblank · · Score: 1

      "and you start looking for the thermite." ... You keep thermite laying around? You must have some killer parties.

    25. Re:In other news by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I've replaced the logic board on a dead SCSI drive (same make/model) and was able to recover data, including wiped stuff.

      Dust off and nuke from orbit. Is only way to be sure.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    26. Re:In other news by Frankenshteen · · Score: 1

      Not sure i'd want to breathe in a room where someone was "wiping" hdd with a magic chef - sheesh!

      --
      "It's a doughnut stuffed with M&M's. That way when you finish the doughnut, you don't have to eat any M&M's."
    27. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what if you disassembled the hard drive in a clean room, and used special equipment to try to recover the data off the platters, or did you do that?

    28. Re:In other news by Lost+Race · · Score: 1

      It's conceivable that some hard drives may have the capability of disabling ECC and PRML decoding, and send the raw signal values from the read heads to the controller. (For all I know such capabilities could even be in the ATAPI spec.) A custom driver (i.e., software) could use that capability and do some kind of magical analysis to get probable past values of zero-overwritten sectors.

      BS is a much more likely alternative explanation, IMHO.

    29. Re:In other news by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Wait a second... What method(s) were you using?

      I haven't yet seen a single person claim to be able to recover from even a single pass wipe. I don't know enough to say whether it's possible, but no one's given eyewitness account of having done it. So what did you do? It couldn't have been to just run software you found. I haven't seen a software package claim to be able to read single-pass overwritten data.

    30. Re:In other news by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      If you're retiring a few dozen computers, even that gets old, and you start looking for the thermite.

      The screen savers beat you to the idea about 5 years ago. Quite spectacularly I might add.

      http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-4147847319296070400

    31. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're either a liar or *YOUR BRAIN* is having some data recovery problems. One pass on zeroing is *fine.* It is a myth that you can recover data after one pass of zeroing.

      See: http://16systems.com/zero/

    32. Re:In other news by toddestan · · Score: 1

      And, in terms of practicality, running DoD-7 takes about 1000 times longer than whipping out the old Sledge-O-Matic.

      Anyone motivated enough isn't going to have any problems with the bent platters the sledge-o-matic is going to leave. Things like melting the drive to slag with thermite may be fun, but most people don't have easy access to thermite or should be messing around with it in the first place. Really, most people are probably best off with the DoD-7 is they have data they absolutely don't want to get out ever.

    33. Re:In other news by bujoojoo · · Score: 1

      Sir, you are inspirational. I have about 15 old pc's in my basement that I am going to fix up and give away. Thank you.

      --
      This space for rent
    34. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news: people still stupid. Has anyone here actually TRIED to get stuff back off a Guttmann wiped drive? ...

        So frankly unless someone here has a citation I have to call bullshit. Frankly it makes me wonder if this kind of stuff isn't cooked up by the HDD manufacturers. I can just imagine them spinning this- "Before giving away that machine destroy the hard drive first!(so they'll have to buy a new one from us! Yay!)"

      Based the outcome of the US intelligence services, from the early warnings on Pearl Harbor to the WTC fiasco, the problem isn't information, its lack of intelligent beings.

      Speed reading the first 16 pages of the DOD manual for erasing disks, I still hadn't encountered the paragraph that says "you need to run program xyz on the hard drive to ensure it is securely erased".

      What we really need to do is feed our dead intelligence community through wood chippers. There is a possible chance that their engrams would be recovered by scanning electron microscopy.

      My ass.

    35. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 pass of zeroes we got around,sorry but it has been awhile, but we got around 80% IIRC. 3 pass was lower(0,1,random), somewhere in the 10-20% range, depending on the software used, but most of the "recovered" data was garbled beyond use, DoD-7 made it pretty much impossible, I think we got 2 .txt files and they were so garbled we couldn't decide if it had actually recovered ANYTHING, certainly nothing you could use, and finally Guttmann we got squat.

      There is no way what you have written here is true. With one pass of zeros you got back 0%, and this number did not change when you did 3 or more passes. If you got anything else, then your wipe pass was done wrong.
      Even people who have the mistaken belief that you can recover overwritten data don't believe you can do it with a software-only approach.

    36. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 pass of zeroes we got around,sorry but it has been awhile, but we got around 80% IIRC.

      With that kind of skills, here's a free $500 for you ⦠http://16systems.com/zero/

    37. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 pass of zeroes we got around,sorry but it has been awhile, but we got around 80% IIRC.

      If the data recovery companies could recover a zeroed drive they'd be advertizing it all over. Guess what? They're really quiet.

      I call bullshit on your story.

    38. Re:In other news by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I'm glad to hear it, there are plenty of folks out there whose lives will be a little better thanks to you. If you need to know who to give them to, I would suggest talking to the folks at your local youth centers, small charity based churches, shelters, foodbanks, etc. These folks will be happy to point out those that can get the most good out of your gift, if they don't disparately need them themselves. This will allow your gift to stay in your community and help those in your own area.

      There really are a lot of single moms, struggling families, small charities that do truly good work, and shelters out there that can really use what we in the IT fields would consider "junk" and by spending just a little of your time and knowledge on them you can really help these folks out while giving these machines a new lease on life instead of letting them end up poison in our landfills. And the first time you see the good that spending a little of your time and knowledge on these machines can bring you'll be glad you did. In these hard times every little bit helps.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    39. Re:In other news by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Well, you know it's so hard to get.

      I mean you can't just get Aluminum Powder on eBay...Of course you can't get any high grade iron oxide there either. And as for buying thermite itself, that's bound to cost a fortune!

      Thermite isn't controlled, and frankly, it couldn't be because the parts are easy to obtain. 3 parts aluminum powder, to 8 parts iron oxide (by weight), and you're good to go. You'll need to throw in a little magnesium to get it started.

      Make some, set fire to something on your lawn, have fun. People are too scared of chemicals these days.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    40. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's more fun than thermite, other than cocaine and sex? Cocaine and sex even mix. Maybe cocaine and thermite mix, but not sex and thermite. I repeat: sex and thermite do not mix. Do not try that at home.

    41. Re:In other news by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Take the platters out and try it, perhaps. You're still about as likely to damage the microwave as the platters would be my guess.

    42. Re:In other news by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Actually, the year-round fireworks store near my house has sparklers, which burn plenty hot enough. They've always worked for me as a final fuse.

      The danger with sparklers is people try to use them as the only fuse, which you really shouldn't do. The sparks themselves can light the thermite before the main combustion reaches it. Put some other kind of fuse to the sparkler and the sparkler only as the final fuse.

      Black powder is supposed to be a suitable fuse material, too, but I've never tried that. I certainly would make sure it was actual black powder and not modern smokeless powder if Iw as going to try it, though.

  4. saveguarding, eh? by yincrash · · Score: 1

    what about using acid?

    1. Re:saveguarding, eh? by yincrash · · Score: 1

      is it british english to use the term "earthing" instead of "grounding"?

    2. Re:saveguarding, eh? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny
      what about using acid?

      It would certainly make smashing a hard drive to smithereens more interesting.

      I wouldn't recommend it though. The paranoia you'd need to decide smashing a hard drive was the best way of preserving your identity would likely make it a pretty harsh trip.

      Try crystal meth instead. The aggression and hyperactivity'd make be damn sure that HDD was properly smashed.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    3. Re:saveguarding, eh? by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

      what about using acid?

      dude, that's like such an awesome idea... like I can see patterns on the disk man. Wow man, you have a wicked selection of porn

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    4. Re:saveguarding, eh? by xorsyst · · Score: 1

      Is it American english to use the term "grounding" instead of "earthing"?

      --
      Get free bitcoins: http://freebitco.in
    5. Re:saveguarding, eh? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And is the term "pissing contest" recognized in both?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:saveguarding, eh? by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about having it fully encripted at all times?

      If your computer is stolen it's quite hard to convince the thief to store it in an acid bath till it stops bubbling.

    7. Re:saveguarding, eh? by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      dude, that's like such an awesome idea... like I can see patterns on the disk man. Wow man, you have a wicked selection of porn

      I don't even see the code anymore. All I see is blonde... brunette... redhead

    8. Re:saveguarding, eh? by qengho · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe it's called a "micturition tournament" in the UK.

    9. Re:saveguarding, eh? by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Kills the framerate on your porn collection.

      Remember kids, if it's 100% encrypted, you stop taking it seriously. Use encryption on data that's important, so there is a sharp divider in your mind between secure, and vulnerable.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    10. Re:saveguarding, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meth is the way to go. Rather than destroying your identity on the disk (and a working disk to boot) just destroy your identity. I like it.

    11. Re:saveguarding, eh? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Remember kids, if it's 100% encrypted, you stop taking it seriously. Use encryption on data that's important, so there is a sharp divider in your mind between secure, and vulnerable.

      And also remember, kids, if there's not a sharp divider in your mind between secure and vulnerable, it's all vulnerable.

    12. Re:saveguarding, eh? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      And also remember, kids, if there's not a sharp divider in your mind between secure and vulnerable, it's all vulnerable.

      Actually, kids, there's no such thing as secure. Things just have varying degrees of vulnerability.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    13. Re:saveguarding, eh? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Oi, wo's 'at? Wo's gettin' drunk got t'do with it?

  5. I find a Magnet Works by s31523 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have a heavy duty magnet that when placed on the top of the drive makes the drive completely useless.
    I doubt anyone could recover data from it, as it is surely scrambled.

    1. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have one of those, too. I keep mine on the side of my computer case.

    2. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? ... I smell bullshit.
      "A magnet strong enough to modify the bits of a hard drive would be strong enough to pull the iron out of your blood cells"

      Laboratory grade degaussers are the only thing strong enough to modify data from a platter.

    3. Re:I find a Magnet Works by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yup, and every drive comes with two of them used for the voice coil actuator. Just be careful when handling them. I've had them both snap together and give me a blood blister.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    4. Re:I find a Magnet Works by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      NO! It does NOT make it completely useless. Someone with a scanning-tunneling microscope could still retrieve portions of your data! The thing that makes this article retarded isn't the difficulty of permanently destroying data, which is best done with intense heat (as in, burn the disk to the point it melts) but the fact that no one cares about your identity OR your porn collection. Just zero the disk once and odds are that will be more than good enough for any of your personal data, unless you are the fucking president or something. Zero the disk or if you must, run a secure formatter, and put it on freecycle if it's too old to sell.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the 80's I knew a guy who worked for a government science agency. He visited a friend who worked at Aberdeen Proving Ground in MD. That day on the firing range were 10 working Silicon Graphics Onyx computers - the Army said they needed to be destroyed because they had sensitive data on the hard drives. So the science agency guy tried to tell them that all they needed to do was drive over the hard drives with a tank but the army folks didn't listen but he did persuade them to give him one Onyx computer minus the hard drive - and the rest were blown away on the range. Personally I use a sledge hammer and a wood splitting maul - great stress reliever.

    6. Re:I find a Magnet Works by zappepcs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Wrong. There were several airlines that suffered complaints that laptops were failing on their planes. The table/trays were magnetic so they could be folded and stowed away. Turns out if you sit a laptop on top of a magnet, the hard drive soon fails.

    7. Re:I find a Magnet Works by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      That's an amazing suggesti

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    8. Re:I find a Magnet Works by s31523 · · Score: 1

      I call BS, and if it were not BS most identity thieves do not have a scanning-tunneling microscope or the knowledge to use one.

      I agree though, for most cases simply using some form of secure format tool will do the job and keep the "honest" people out.

    9. Re:I find a Magnet Works by dkf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Just zero the disk once and odds are that will be more than good enough for any of your personal data, unless you are the fucking president or something.

      "Can you guys recover my data?"
      "Yes we can!"

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    10. Re:I find a Magnet Works by bossanovalithium · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So here's the definitive crash test results: http://tinyurl.com/6obkkn Looked like a lot of fun,and kinda proved that HD's are the tech version of the plasticbag - they are difficult to get deal with...

    11. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Goaway · · Score: 1

      You do know that hard drives have extremely strong magnets sitting a couple of millimeters from the platters, right? You're not going to get a strong field than that out of anything outside the casing short of an MRI machine.

    12. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I have a heavy duty magnet too. It sits right inside the harddrive next to the platters, just like in every other harddrive.

    13. Re:I find a Magnet Works by AntEater · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you're really want to have fun, you should take the magnet out of the drive. Those things area amazing. I had a co-worker who pulled the magnets out a whole slew of retired 5" hard drives. You could hang incredible amounts of weight from those things. Very easy to smash your fingers between them too. Just don't do it on your employer's time.

      oh yeah, you could use that magnet to wipe the platter while you've got the drive open.

      --
      Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    14. Re:I find a Magnet Works by conureman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      TFA makes the point that for most of us, a wipe or a hammer job is adequate to deter the schmoogs. The web is full of various tests of redox reactions to destroy the platters, if your data is in a glowing puddle of molten aluminium, it's probably secure.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    15. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric Drill + 1/4in bit + 5 holes = destroyed data

    16. Re:I find a Magnet Works by drerwk · · Score: 1

      The voice coil magnet is closed so that the field is strongest between the gap where the voice coil moves. Otherwise the field stays within the magnet. Think about the classic horse shoe magnet. If you connect the ends with a bit of iron, the field is closed.

    17. Re:I find a Magnet Works by dword · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you work for a big company, chances are you are very interested in this article and it doesn't sound retarded at all. I was actually asked by one of my ex-employers for the best method to dispose of a hard-disk so that nobody could retrieve information from it, for good reasons.

    18. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I think that an unmodified hardware with a modified hardrive driver is able to retrieve data that was zeroed once with a good accuracy. The trick is to get the analogic value measured by the magnetic head instead of just 1 or 0. If you measure all zeroes as 0.001 and 0.100 values and ones as 0.9 and 0.999 values, it is not hard to guess what the previous value of each bit was.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    19. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even RFTA? Wait, this is /.
      FTA:"Whatever is going on, I would think it is not very serious," says Wiseman. "Otherwise we would see a hell of a lot more cases of hard disk corruption."

      I think it might just be the jolting around and bumping happening on the airplane not magnetism. After all this article is over 10 years old.

    20. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Goaway · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that the ones I've opened have made from pretty nonmagnetic materials, so it's not closed. The field is strongest in the gap, sure, but there's plenty of field leaking around it.

    21. Re:I find a Magnet Works by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      I work for the government - when we surplus our computers they get a 7-pass wipe + a Linux install and they're out the door.

      7 passes is considered safe enough for us (and the Department of Defense) - it's certainly good enough for virtually all companies no matter how special they might feel or how much they want to stroke their ego.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    22. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have any single-pass-zeroed hard drives you'd like to sell? And what is your bank balance?

      I've recovered data from formatted drives, re-partitioned drives, and even one-pass-zeroed drives with COTS software.

    23. Re:I find a Magnet Works by PalmKiller · · Score: 1

      7 pass? You guys used to do 3, did you find that it could still be recovered at 3 passes? I hope 7 is really secure :)

    24. Re:I find a Magnet Works by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      dude, that slogan was about flash memory, not about hard drives.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    25. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you even read TFA that you pointed to? they found it wasn't tray tables at all. geez. i know this is /. and all but come on.

    26. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i build industrial magnetizers for production factories. These are 3 phase 240~600V machines capable of charging and discharging even very large and very high grades of neo magnets in magnetic motor structures. In fact my company builds the only non-capacitive discharge neo mags in the world. Our design goes from 1 polarity while charging a magnet it will completely destroy the information on a harddrive. No amount of recovery would ever bring it back. Considering these machines sell for well over $60K they are not practicle for end users...but maybe we should start offering a courier service to blank your data. Charges would be in the $1 per drive range. hmmmm. Anyways...i can clean your data off and not have to physically destroy anything. Now you may never beable to use the drive again. I will have to test this. Damn you /. makin work for me.

    27. Re:I find a Magnet Works by nonewmsgs · · Score: 1

      i remember my sister called me and told me the equivalent of she was having trouble with her laptop. later on in the conversation she asked if putting magnets on it were bad and asked why there wasn't a warning label.

    28. Re:I find a Magnet Works by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      7 passes is all it takes? Damn, I don't ever let one of my old machines out the door until it's completed the 35-pass run using OS X's Disk Utility. Takes several days to complete. Call me paranoid, but .. I want to be sure.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    29. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You should probably tell that to hard drive manufacturers. They could use that knowledge to store twice as much data on the disk.

    30. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      the fact that no one cares about your identity

      Really? Tell that to to guy who opened a credit card in my name (using my SSN, DOB, address and yet somehow the wrong Mother's maiden name) and tried to get a large cash advance on it. It was only a quirk of fate the saved me some serious credit record damage. (They opened the card using my address, changed it to theirs, and paid to get it rush-shipped. The card wound up being mailed before the address change went through.) How the thief got my information, I don't know. It could have been from dozens of different sources both under my control (unlikely though it may be) and not under my control (employer, doctor's office, etc). Still, my information is out there now and I need to watch my credit like a hawk. The next thief might not be so incompetent and I might find myself trying to explain to the credit agencies that I did *NOT* open up a dozen accounts with mailing addresses scattered around the US. So, yes, people *DO* care about your identity and can do you some serious financial harm if they obtain it.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    31. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that you worked for Enron.

    32. Re:I find a Magnet Works by digitalsolo · · Score: 1

      zero the disk once and odds are that will be more than good enough for any of your personal data, unless you are the fucking president or something.

      It might also be relevant if you are in fact, fucking the president, as opposed to simply being the fucking president.

      --
      Just another ignorant American.
    33. Re:I find a Magnet Works by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      but the fact that no one cares about your identity OR your porn collection. Just zero the disk once and odds are that will be more than good enough for any of your personal data, unless you are the fucking president or something.

      I agree completely. No one is going to bother with a few weeks of work taking apart the drive to get access to you're $371.39 bank account when they can spend 1 hour and simply find that the next disk in line is fully formatted and has all the information they need.

      The whole article is a little sensationalist and ridiculous to me. I'm surprised to see such shoddy reporting from the BBC.

    34. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 pass? You guys used to do 3, did you find that it could still be recovered at 3 passes? I hope 7 is really secure :)

      Depends on which section of the government your talking about, DOE (where I work), only requires a 3 pass BUT only if the data was at a classified or lower security setting. Anything over classified needs destroyed, and drives with classified data can only be re-used if written justification from the ISSO is supplied. These directives went into effect 12-23-2008 for DOE. Other agencies needs may be more or less lenient as determined by who knows who.

    35. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Yvanhoe · · Score: 0

      Capacity is not the only characteristic that a manufacturer tries to maximize. If you have a 99.990% success rate at reading previously erased data, that is still one error every 10 kilobytes. Acceptable for recovery, not so much for everyday use.
      I also suspect that such a mode is slower than regular reading.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    36. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO! It does NOT make it completely useless

      Very true.

      You could use a magnet, but just setting it on top won't do much, you need to move it. The problem with a magnet is that it tends to change ALL the data on the drive in a uniform manner.

      So no, you wouldn't be able to just toss it into a computer & recover the data, but there's plenty of companies that could easily pull most, if not all, the data back off for a few hundred bucks.

      ROFL, my captchca is "magnet"

    37. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is an example of how slashdot has died. A comment saying "what you got to hide?" rated as 'Insightful'. I am sure Mr. drinkypoo would gladly handle copies of his harddisk if you send him/her a self-addressed envelope with postage attached.

    38. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you have a report, where someone claims he has actually done it?

    39. Re:I find a Magnet Works by TCM · · Score: 1

      These directives went into effect 12-23-2008 for DOE. Other agencies needs may be more or less lenient as determined by who knows who.

      Apparently, the DOE doesn't even know ISO date formats. 12-23-2008 looks like the attempt to say 2008-12-23 but it ended up as bullshit.

      --
      Of course it runs NetBSD. BTC: 1NT7QvbetmANwaMzhpVL6
    40. Re:I find a Magnet Works by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      DOE might, for all we know. AC apparently doesn't. What, are you surprised?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    41. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Sancho · · Score: 1

      The 7-pass wipe is a commonly repeated myth. There are two ways that the DoD accepts for hard drive end-of-life:

      1) For drives with only unclassified information, you must clear (or sanitize[1]) the data. This is ambiguous, though some agencies use a 3-pass multi-pattern method. Recent versions of the document (I can't remember the title) reference a table from the Defense Security Service which includes examples of methods. This is probably where the three-pass method comes from (outside of degaussing or destruction, the only way to sanitize according to this document is to overwrite with a character, its complement, and then a random character--thus three passes.)

      2) For drives with classified information, destruction of the physical media is the only acceptable means of disposal according to the DoD.

      [1] Clearing and sanitizing have become somewhat synonymous in their usage, these days, so if you work for the government, you're probably best off using the method which is more thorough.

    42. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know someone who stole millions by opening bank accounts in other peoples' names. He got all the personal info of his marks from a person working for the bank, an insider. This situation makes destroying your HDD completely futile, eh.

    43. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, you could use that magnet to wipe the platter while you've got the drive open.

      Probably not strong enough, sadly enough. In order to store more data in increasingly smaller spaces, platters are made to be much more resistant to magnetic changes today. Same with tape and stuff.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    44. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Chabo · · Score: 1

      While working at my undergrad school for their IT department, I once encountered a kid who put his magnet that the Health Services department on the side of his case so he could find it easily. I told him he should probably move it, and he said "Oh wow, I had no idea that was an issue!"

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    45. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      This situation makes destroying your HDD completely futile, eh.

      If the car thief smashes your window and hotwires your car, it certainly made remembering to take the keys out of the ignition futile, eh.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    46. Re:I find a Magnet Works by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Informative

      The 'previous value' of each bit is nonsense.

      For one thing, hard drives do not store data like that. They store a one when the data changes, and a zero when it's the same. So 11010011 would actually be written as written as 10111010.

      A quick thought will demonstrate that not knowing the value of any bit will render the entire rest of the byte unknown.

      More importantly, bytes start without a value. They are in indeterminate state, they are magnetized. They are essentially .5. They are then formatted, at the factory, by writing a 'zero' to them.

      Pretending that your idea worked (Which it doesn't.) every bit would read as a one. (Or, rather, every bit as a change bit, resulting in the data being 10101010.)

      However, your idea is dumb to start with, because, as the other reply points out, hard drives aren't storing 0 or 1. They're storing 0.0-0.3 and 0.7-1.0, because hard drive manufactures make them as dense as possible, to the point that when writing one bit, you can't help but slightly alter the bit ahead or behind it. The development of hard drives is a contest to produce less overlap when writing.

      Which means if you were to actually read the value of a bit, there would be a good chance it was 0.2 not because it 'used' to be a 1, which incidentally doesn't work that way, but because it has a 1 after it.

      This is actually somewhat of a simplification, because in actuality, at the base level, hard drives are 'analog'. The strength of write is not a square wave, or even a jigsaw wave. It is much smoother than that. It is like transmitting morse code using a slide whistle.

      I know there are lots of stupid urban myths about how hard drives work, but if there was a way to recover data from an overwritten hard drive, it would immediately get used to store more data on the drive.

      The only way to recover data from a zero'd hard drive is to look for remapped sectors.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    47. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zero the disk, and its not possible to see an pattern of last changed atoms in each bit section of disk?

    48. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, your knowledge is several decades out of date. Hard drives record a complex analog signal that is just at the limit of being readable and they use complex Viterbi PRML decoders to guess the data. It has to be at the densities we are at now.

    49. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, very much so.

    50. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A magnet will render the drive useless but data can still be recovered from it. When a bit is erased or overwritten the peak does not completely go away. The peak becomes rounded. It does take removing the platters and an electron microscope to read the rounded peaks so a magnet will work for most people.

      As the article states the only way to be sure is to physically destroy the platters. I hear fire works well also.

    51. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..but the fact that no one cares about your identity OR your porn collection. Just zero the disk once and odds are that will be more than good enough for any of your personal data, unless you are the fucking president or something. Zero the disk or if you must, run a secure formatter, and put it on freecycle if it's too old to sell.

      I agree. You should not underestimate the vastness of the fucking presidents porn collection. After all, he is the president of fuck.

    52. Re:I find a Magnet Works by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think you understand how hard drives work. From the OS's point of view, storage is digital. That means you can not see the magnetism on the disk. The conversion of analog reading of a magnetic field to a digital value is internal to the disk. Then that data is sent out over the bus for the OS to process.

      It's really surprising to see a comment like this get moderated informative on slashdot.

    53. Re:I find a Magnet Works by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      I imagine a belt sander might also help a bit...

    54. Re:I find a Magnet Works by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 0

      That's why he said "modified hardware driver", presumably one that feeds that raw data back across the bus without digital-izing it.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    55. Re:I find a Magnet Works by ApproachingLinux · · Score: 1

      or the source you never think about - the credit card company. my wife had a credit card go missing and when we called, we found out that a change of address had been put in (before we even got the card) - they traced it to an employee. fortunately, no charges had been made (that we know about).

    56. Re:I find a Magnet Works by piltdownman84 · · Score: 1

      Just zero the disk once and odds are that will be more than good enough for any of your personal data

      Chances are if I'm getting rid of a drive its because it died, and now I have lost productive time and possibly work if I don't have a backup.

      Smashing the piece of crap to a million bits and then burning to a crisp lets me get a little revenge.

    57. Re:I find a Magnet Works by noidentity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Data isn't encoded as absolute values on the drive; it's much more complex than that. Throw in error correction and it looks like noise, no matter what the data are.

    58. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I didn't have any accounts open with Capital One (the card that got opened in my name). I did have one years ago, but that was before my current address (which the card was sent to). Still, I wouldn't discount any source for leaking my information. I'll likely never know. The police barely followed up on the case. I finally got tired of calling back again and again to prod them into action. They even told me that they needed to investigate first to find out if it was even in their jurisdiction. Capital One, meanwhile stonewalled both my and the police. They refused to give me any information and told me to have the police call a certain number. That number was "staffed" by a recording. We finally pried enough information out of Capital One to figure out that the credit card was applied for online. Other than that, I got little to no information on the thief.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    59. Re:I find a Magnet Works by ApproachingLinux · · Score: 1

      our problem was with Fleet (which became part of Chase)

    60. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Phillibuster · · Score: 1

      but the fact that no one cares about your identity OR your porn collection

      If that's true, why is there malware out there to steal it?

    61. Re:I find a Magnet Works by speedtux · · Score: 1

      That's not how hard drives work. Furthermore, decoding and encoding the analog signal happens in the drive, not in the driver.

      And whatever analog properties one can take advantage of, drive manufacturers are already taking advantage of to maximize storage.

    62. Re:I find a Magnet Works by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      I was just giving an example of the encoding. Yeah, that's like a decade-ago encoding, but the point stands.

      Modern hard drives use even weirder encoding, almost at the level of byte-level encoding, where there are basically 256 different patterns that bear no relationship to the actual bit patterns. They have a pattern for 00000000, 00000001, etc. It is a complicated waveform, not a highs and lows. For all I know, they're even higher now, with a single wave that represents a 16 bit patterns.

      And hence talking about the 'value' of the 'previous bit' is nonsense. There's not even such thing as a location on the drive a 'bit' is stored at, much less some sort of partial remain of a previous bit.

      And I did say that they use an 'analog signal'. That was half the point of my post.

      The 'recover bits' idea is based on essentially the same idea that all modems are 2400 bps, because that's the highest baud rate phone lines can support. That is, indeed, the highest baud rate, but that just means we started doing something besides toggling the phone line off and on, to transmit more than one bit at a time. Hard drives stopped doing that a long time ago.

      Of course, even if they were doing that, you still couldn't recover the data of a zero'd drive by looking as 'residue' data. Even in an imaginary world where a previously-written-and-then-zero'd bit is 0.1, and a hypothetically-never-written bit is 0, that would not actually recover any data, because of the aforementioned fact that hard drives do not start out at 'zero'. They are formatted to zero, at the factory. (In fact, they don't even have 'tracks' on them before that.)

      If there really was a 'residue' value left behind, every single bit would have it. Pretending hard drives actually worked that way.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    63. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Alcoholist · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? There's been this myth going around for years that you can accidentally erase your hard drive by putting fridge magnets on the side of your case. It's total bullshit. A buddy of mine tried to replicate this by putting rare-earth magnets right on top of a drive. It didn't do jack. The drive was fine and all the data was intact.

      --
      Bibo Ergo Sum.
    64. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Capacity is not the only characteristic that a manufacturer tries to maximize.

      Well, yeah. They'll gladly trade sacrifice 10% of density if they can read the disk 10 times faster that way. That probably leaves you within 20% of information theoretical limit instead of 10%. Good luck decoding that stuff.

    65. Re:I find a Magnet Works by kasperd · · Score: 1

      If you have a 99.990% success rate at reading previously erased data, that is still one error every 10 kilobytes. Acceptable for recovery, not so much for everyday use.

      As long as you know what probability you have and what probability you want, you can design an appropriate redundant encoding to achieve that. So if you really could read overwritten data with that success rate, then drives would indeed be using it.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    66. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough. Maybe it was possible to read back deleted data 25 years ago when drives used external stepper motors with a screw shaft to position the head; if the head didn't come back to the exact same place it was before, deleting that track would leave some signal beside the new track. Modern drives use embedded servo signals so the controller can find the track continuously and I think there's really no spillover when you re-write. I think it's nonsense to think you can recover previously written data on a modern drive. As a matter of fact, I think a Randi style reward for anyone who can recover a previous file on a modern HD would be interesting.

    67. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Formatted drives I'd believe, since they usually only overwrite the directory tables. Repartitioning also doesn't overwrite data, it just wipes out the partition table info.

      As for recovering data from one-pass-zeroed drives with pure software, I'm going to say that's absolute bullshit. No way at all did you do that if the drives were actually re-written with zeroes.

    68. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A hard drive manufacturer need near 100% accuracy with error correction. A spy could strike paydirt with a lot less. A spy could also use a lot more computationally intensive techniques aimed at finding specific data.

    69. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Ok, after research, I saw that this post of mine is complete bullshit. Mod it down to hell.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    70. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Proteus · · Score: 1

      Reading a modern hard disk that's been written over with zeroes is not that simple, and would likely require very specialized, very precise hardware.

      The historical problem with writing over with zeroes was that the amount of magnetic surface between tracks on the platter was fairly large. This space between tracks would keep a "ghost" of previous data should there be only zeroes written to the nearby tracks. Guttman's research and the DoD wiping method were designed to overwrite the track data and make sure that that "ghost data" would be wiped as well.

      Modern disks have such narrow gaps between tracks that overwriting with zeroes is sufficient to stump any commercial data-recovery attempts. (See, e.g. The Great Zero Challenge).

      The military takes more extreme measures with highly-classified data because there are ridiculously expensive and time-consuming methods that one could use to recover data that's been "merely" wiped. There are governments and organizations that have those resources that might be willing to expend them to get their hands on such data.

      There are not criminal organizations that have or will expend the insane effort to recover the information that might be on an individual's drive. The cost-benefit just isn't there. An individual who boots something like DBAN and does a one-pass wipe of all zeroes across the entire disk is entirely safe from anyone who has less resources than a major government intelligence agency.

      --
      We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
    71. Re:I find a Magnet Works by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You win TEH PRIZE, I will respond to your comment instead of everyone else's. What I obviously meant is that no one cares enough about your identity to go through a procedure that a data recovery company charges $10,000 and up for to get it, when they can probably get your identity through the carelessness of someone you have done business with, or in a wholesale automated fashion using malware which requires no actual effort on their part.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    72. Re:I find a Magnet Works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not an issue.

    73. Re:I find a Magnet Works by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Nah, like I said, all areas of the drive start out as scrambled, so all 'previous' bits would read as one, pretending that actually worked.

      It was a stupid idea to start with even when hard drives did store data in such a way it was possible to look at each bit, simply because there's no magical fairy running around making sure the drive is 100% magnetically inactive before you use it, which is the only way you could later see the 'spillover'.

      The only justification for anything more than a zero-wipe is possibly remapped bad sectors.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    74. Re:I find a Magnet Works by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Did "Let me take it home and overwrite it with alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.* a few dozen times" seem to work?

    75. Re:I find a Magnet Works by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Not if you're the admin at the bank and the insider grabbed the HDD out of the trash. If the insider actually grabbed the records through an authorized user account, that's different.

    76. Re:I find a Magnet Works by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      This is an old myth that once wasn't a myth.

      Some people used to hold floppy disks to refrigerators and such like they were kid's drawings or takeout menus. When the magnetic field goes through the disk strongly enough to hold the floppy's weight, there's a good chance you're damaging the data.

      It's not going to do much, if anything, to put even a strong a magnet on the outside of a hard disk case. Putting one on the outside of a computer's exterior case won't even have a chance. Don't stick it right next to the tape load slot for a backup drive, though.

    77. Re:I find a Magnet Works by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      As long as you know what probability you have and what probability you want, you can design an appropriate redundant encoding to achieve that.

      Your redundant encoding would take at least as much extra space as you saved by increasing the data density.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    78. Re:I find a Magnet Works by kasperd · · Score: 1

      Your redundant encoding would take at least as much extra space as you saved by increasing the data density.

      No. Assuming the numbers in the comment I replied to are correct, the redundant encoding would take just a few percent when doubling the density for a net gain of more than 90% in capacity.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    79. Re:I find a Magnet Works by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      He wasn't claiming 99.99% recovery was practical, merely pointing out that any errors are too many.

      If you doubled the density of the drive by storing 2 bits on top and reading both the "current" and "previous" values, you wouldn't get anywhere near that high of a recovery, and you would need to use at least as much data as you saved in order to store the necessary error correction data.

      If you stored 2 bits overlapping as before but you made each bit 80% larger, you would only slightly increase your data capacity, but you'd be able to achieve a higher recovery rate – and again you would need to use more data to store the error correction data than you'd saved, although you'd need less error correction than in the first scenario.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    80. Re:I find a Magnet Works by kasperd · · Score: 1

      If you doubled the density of the drive by storing 2 bits on top and reading both the "current" and "previous" values, you wouldn't get anywhere near that high of a recovery, and you would need to use at least as much data as you saved in order to store the necessary error correction data.

      But that is not true. The current value in itself would be used exactly the way it currently is and thus give the same amount of capacity as we have today, any capacity that you could get out of the previous values would thus mean an increase in capacity. If the previous values can be read correctly with a probability high enough to matter in case of recovery, then that can be used with an error correcting encoding to get some additional capacity. You need to know aproximately what the probability is in order to design the encoding. Let's for a moment assume you get a correct bit with 60% probability and a wrong bit with 40% probability. An error correcting code could then repeat each bit 125 times and use the majority when reading to get a correct result with 99% probability. That's a very simplistic approach, you can design a better encoding that utilizes capacity better, you just have to know how reliable you can read data from the physical media and how reliable you want the result to be.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    81. Re:I find a Magnet Works by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If the previous values can be read correctly with a probability high enough to matter in case of recovery, then that can be used with an error correcting encoding to get some additional capacity.

      My argument is that the extra error correcting encoding will consume all the additional capacity you've gained, if not more. You can't get something for nothing.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  6. Or make it reusable... by Seakip18 · · Score: 5, Informative

    and just use dBan, Derrick's Boot and Nuke.

    Nothing beats an afternoon of watching dBan and a comfy chair. Beer or whisky optional.

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
    1. Re:Or make it reusable... by ep32g79 · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Or make it reusable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nothing beats an afternoon of watching dBan and a comfy chair. Beer or whisky optional.

      dBan sounds cool. So I put it on a disk and ran it. It really doesn't look that special. My computer won't turn on now.

    3. Re:Or make it reusable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dBan sounds cool. So I put it on a disk and ran it. It really doesn't look that special. My computer won't turn on now.

      You probably knocked the power cord out.

    4. Re:Or make it reusable... by Seakip18 · · Score: 1

      Or Darik's. Sorry about that.

      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
    5. Re:Or make it reusable... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      Wait for it...

      Wait for it...

      ...

      WHOOOOSH!!

      Ahhh...goes down smooth and refreshing every time!

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    6. Re:Or make it reusable... by Seakip18 · · Score: 1

      Was working fine when I clicked it a second ago. /. effect?

      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
    7. Re:Or make it reusable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whoosh you just mentioned was in reference to yourself, correct?

    8. Re:Or make it reusable... by Richard+W.M.+Jones · · Score: 1

      These tools don't help if you can't plug the drive into a computer. I had a bunch of hard drives to get rid of, mostly P-ATA, some SCSI-LVD. I only have one computer left with P-ATA, and since it's my main computer and I really have better things to do than dismantle my main computer and plug in ten drives, waiting hours each time, I used a drill to destroy them in about 10 minutes. I haven't seen a SCSI-LVD connector on a computer for at least eight years.

      Rich.

    9. Re:Or make it reusable... by Seakip18 · · Score: 1

      That actually makes sense. You can't reuse those or even use the tools. As an intern one summer, I got a couple of Sun boxes to surplus. I actually took the HD's to a friends and we filled the things with .22 and buck shot since the place really didn't care as long as it disappeared. After that, a bonfire where I think we managed to melt them.

      However, with a lab bench setup, you can have multiple monitors and multiple machines. It's kinda neat to watch the destruction across the various monitors.

      --
      import system.cool.Sig;
    10. Re:Or make it reusable... by lophophore · · Score: 1

      Uhhh, yeah. What beats dban, especially when joined with beer and or whisky, is putting your old hard drive on an anvil and having a couple first class whacks at it with a great big sledgehammer.

      You should try it. It is much more comforting and entertaining that watching dban run.

      Of course, if you smashed the drive while dban was running on it, that could be even more relaxing. Computer case and CRT optional.

      --
      there are 3 kinds of people:
      * those who can count
      * those who can't
    11. Re:Or make it reusable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What fun you must be at parties ...

    12. Re:Or make it reusable... by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I can use any PATA or LVD drives you care to get rid of that don't have sensitive information on them. I keep a collection of older computer tech, most of it assembled as working machines.

    13. Re:Or make it reusable... by WindShadow · · Score: 1

      Nothing beats an afternoon of watching dBan and a comfy chair. Beer or whisky optional.

      Not sure the beverage is optional for that, but I agree that dban rules! You are almost certainly better protected against data recovery with dban, unless you have a handy plasma torch to randomize the ones and zeros.

  7. Kindness by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'll have to excuse me. I'm need to go protect my ex-wife from identity theft.

    1. Re:Kindness by Speare · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'll have to excuse me. I'm need to go protect my ex-wife from identity theft.

      So she uses ReiserFS?

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Kindness by Oidhche · · Score: 1

      Hans Reiser, is that you?

    3. Re:Kindness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *lol

  8. Environmentally criminal! by thegoldenear · · Score: 3, Informative

    This recommendation from Which? magazine has incensed me today. They're reported as saying "It sounds extreme, but the only way to be 100% safe is to smash your hard drive into smithereens.". There's no need to do this if you use disk wiping software, which is probably even better than a hammer; as the BBC article points out. Darik's Boot And Nuke is perfect for this. It's environmentally criminal to be suggesting the best way to wipe a disk is to smash it.

    Pete Boyd

    1. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Problem is that most people are way too stupid to understand how to use that, but they can understand smash.

      The funny part, 90% of those people that understand smash, will not smash it enough. I have recovered data from laptop hard drives that looked pretty smashed, but 45 minutes in my improvised clean room moving the platters to a different drive and I was able to read the contents.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Environmentally criminal! by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      Nice. I've not come across anyone transferring platters before. Presumably you use an identical drive with the same controller board?

      This is what I meant that disk wiping software will be more thorough than a hammer.

      But yeah, people aren't able to download an ISO and burn it to disc, then set their BIOS to boot from CD.

    3. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Chrisq · · Score: 4, Funny

      The funny part, 90% of those people that understand smash, will not smash it enough.

      Another 5% will enjoy it so much that they will do the same thing to their new computer, the TV and the next door neighbours car.

    4. Re:Environmentally criminal! by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I think Darik's Boot And Nuke actually is better at preventing identity thief then smashing your drive. Ok less assume you are tossing an old drive say a 20GB You smash the drive into 100 pieces each piece has about 200mb on the average. Chances are if you really wanted that data you take the pieces and make a custom drive that can read the data off a fragment of disk. Yes it will be to much work for the casual id thief but it is still there. Fill with 1 then with 0 then randomly a few times any additional magnetic residue from your drive will so mixed up with other data that you cannot possible determine what bit use to be high and then low.
      Remember we still live an an analog world digital data is still stored analog however when we read it and write it we give it values within a discrete range where it is safely 1 of safely 0 however if you just fill it with all 1 or 0 the chances are your old ones except for having 0.00001T of magnetic force they will have 0.00001001T of force, and if you have sensitive enough equitment you can find your origional data again.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    5. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's really not that hard to transfer platters. and yes use an identical drive.

      a makeshift clean room is easy. run the shower in the bathroom for 15 minutes on the hottest setting and then shut it off and let the room cool down completely. the mist in the air will remove all dust as it falls to the ground. use a tyvek suit and cover your hair, face, hands and you're good to go.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Smashing a piece of hardware is easy to understand.

      Disk wiping software has a manual, a hammer doesn't.

    7. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's environmentally criminal to be suggesting the best way to wipe a disk is to smash it.

      It's also *extremely dangerous* for someone who's not used to tools and their safety precautions to be smashing a metal/glass object like this. Lots of people might have (say) a hammer and screwdriver around the house but no goggles. What do the 'Which' people think is preferable? - having your identity stolen or losing an eye?
      They'd be much better off giving a simple sequence of instructions for running a boot-and-nuke CD. Or telling people just to take the HD out and put it in a safe place. Or just stick the old PC in the damn attic! Anything but this.

      When's the first lawsuit coming? "I followed Which's advice and now I'm blind!"

    8. Re:Environmentally criminal! by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      Maybe for the writing and booting, but if you think you need a manual for Darik's Boot n Nuke once it's up and running, you should check it out - boot with the CD, press a key and everything attached to the computer is automatically nuked.
      (at least, that's the way it used to be, I haven't used it in years)

      Pete Boyd

    9. Re:Environmentally criminal! by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      I like this idea of just removing the disk and storing it away on a shelf. This is what I've done with my hard disks for the last fifteen years. It gives you an extra backup, on a different kind of medium, to floppy disk / CD / DVD / etcetera. And a secure feeling that no matter how you took a backup you've at least probably got access to the original in a form that so far remains accessible if other formats were to fail (and they all do - I can't read old floppy discs, and CD/DVD by Ritek in theory can fail in five years)

      Pete Boyd

    10. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Menkhaf · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. In fact, I have already written to one Danish newspaper, in an attempt to stop them from spewing this kind of crap. When did journalists become proxies for each other, mindlessly replicating the stories from other journalists without ever thinking for themselves, looking up the sources or even thinking about source credibility?

      --
      A proud member of the Onion-in-Hand alliance
    11. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa.

      You must be a terrorist!

    12. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Problem is that most people are way too stupid to understand how to use that, but they can understand smash.

      Exactly. Even the Hulk can understand smash.

    13. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Picass0 · · Score: 1

      It's only environmentally unsound if people dispose of the parts improperly. Many communities in the US now have computer part recycling programs, companies that will take your parts for scrap metal, or any number of alternatives to chucking it in the landfill.

      The computer industry could do more to educate people about recycling old machines, monitors, etc... Focus your indignation in that direction.

      As it's been pointed out, Grandma and Grandpa don't understand disk utilities. They do understand "smash".

    14. Re:Environmentally criminal! by tuxgeek · · Score: 1

      I've been sitting on several dead hard drives for years and still pondering how to dispose of them properly. Cannot wipe them using software as they are dead. Currently doing a test disassembly to see if the platters can be removed and wiped with a magnet or heated to destroy old data such as SS numbers. Any good suggestions which is the best method to wipe the disks? Also which components should be recycled so as to avoid disposal in the local landfill.

      --
      "Suppose you were an idiot...and suppose you were a member of Congress...but I repeat myself." Mark Twain
    15. Re:Environmentally criminal! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      There is no disk wiping softer that can't be beat.

      Smash the platter.
      Place bit in can
      Add magnets from hard drive
      Add fire.

      100%

      OF course the question people need to answer is: How valuable will the thief think you data is too them?

      Considering almost all disk wiping software can be undone after downloading some free app, the barrier to breaking the basic stuff is very low.

      Plus the hard drive will be obsolete, and as such tossed out anyways.

      "environmentally criminal"

      Now there's a nonsense statement.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:Environmentally criminal! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Good call on the improvised clean room.
      I would add a space heater to remove the remaining moisture. A space heater without a fan.

      Of course, the drives longevity is shot to hell.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:Environmentally criminal! by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      It's only environmentally unsound if people dispose of the parts improperly.

      No it's not, because recycling something is usually environmentally more destructive than reusing it.

      The computer industry could do more to educate people about recycling old machines, monitors, etc... Focus your indignation in that direction.

      Here in Europe it's illegal _not_ to recycle. See the WEEE directive.
      My indignation centres around the fact that smashing a hard disk prevents it from being reused.

      As it's been pointed out, Grandma and Grandpa don't understand disk utilities. They do understand "smash".

      Yes. But it's also been pointed out that smashing a hard disk leaves its data potentially recoverable, and can result in injury.

      Pete Boyd

    18. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do liquefied bodies really go down the drain that easily without it plugging up?

      Someone check on the welfare of this man's wife.

    19. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's environmentally criminal to be suggesting the best way to wipe a disk is to smash it.

      It would be MUCH MORE environmentally damaging to run a large array of 25 used 40GB hard-drives rather than 1 new 1TB drive. The power to run and subsequently cool may likely offset any "savings" you achieve. Not to mention the lack of reliability might lead to more mirrors and backups than would otherwise be needed. When the technology of today is ten times more efficient than that of a few years ago, well... cruising along in your Model T is not doing anything beyond stroking your ego. I still have a ~400 MB drive, unless I want data off of it, its only value is either nefarious or nostalgic.

    20. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      But yeah, people aren't able to download an ISO and burn it to disc, then set their BIOS to boot from CD.

      Shouldn't it be possible to wipe your disk while the normal OS is running? (something like 'sudo while 1 dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/sda' ?)

      Run that for a few hours, and then pull the plug on the machine to make sure the (now hosed) OS doesn't try to write anything before shutdown... ?

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    21. Re:Environmentally criminal! by j_sp_r · · Score: 1

      man shred

    22. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that 90% of people think that their hard drive is actually the tower/box/case. You can smash that all you want and quite possibly never damage that little box inside that hums and clicks.

    23. Re:Environmentally criminal! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Hehe, similar incident. A friend recovered a DVD-R drive from the trash of Best Buy or some place that smashes tossed items with a hammer, to be sure nobody gets any use of them. The case was cracked, the top metal sheet of the drive was dented in, and the spindle on the drive motor was jammed down in the process. I removed the metal cover, fixed the spindle, and manually placed the top piece over the disc center, and it's successfully burned CDs. Quite fast, too. Modern stuff has so many feedback loops that it doesn't require lots of manual adjustments and is fairly durable in the face of major trauma like this.

    24. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the next door neighbours cat

      There, fixed it for you.

    25. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In theory that's great, but have you actually tried this?

      I had a hard drive with a damaged circuit board on the bottom. I got another drive from the same manufactured batch, nearly all numbers on the drive were identical, it was only a few serial numbers apart. I swapped the circuit board on the bottom, didn't even have to open the drive up and expose the platters, and it wouldn't read the data.

      I think the drives are each calibrated to their individual platters when they're assembled. The calibration markings on the bottom didn't match.

      What are your experiences?

    26. Re:Environmentally criminal! by maxume · · Score: 1

      Oh whatever. If we can't come up with a way to make clean energy and then use it to separate out the materials contained in a hard drive, we are fucked anyway.

      Also, the market for obsolete drives of questionable reliability is only so big, and what do you think those people do with disks when they stop using them?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    27. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 1

      Just use shred -v /dev/xxx. It doesn't work on modern filing systems, but it sure as hell works on a block device.

      --
      www.isoHunt.com
    28. Re:Environmentally criminal! by lewko · · Score: 1

      My Mother thinks the "hard drive" is that large box which sits under the desk.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    29. Re:Environmentally criminal! by lewko · · Score: 1

      Another 5% will enjoy it so much that they will do the same thing to their new computer, the TV and the next door neighbours car.

      The smarter ones will do it to their neighbour's computer and TV also.

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    30. Re:Environmentally criminal! by thegoldenear · · Score: 1

      We buy ex-corporate desktop computers from a couple of years ago second-hand for our clients. They always have a 40GB hard disk in them. Information Workers require nothing more. Thus I'd speculate most computers have a 40GB hard disk in them; maybe bumped up to 80GB if the computer were brand new, but there'd be no need of that extra 40GB when data is saved on the server.

      Pete Boyd

    31. Re:Environmentally criminal! by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I have done it 5 times. works great.

      Hardest part, you GOTTA keep the alignment of multiple platters. Laptop drives are easy as you only need to get the one platter in place, I have yet to get a multi platter drive to read as even 1 billionth of an inch off and it will not be right. so smaller capacity single platter Hard drives are what I try to tackle.

      I have also done the bottom board replacements, but 9 times out of 10 if the board is dead then something inside the drive is dead as well (driver board in by the heads on some, head failure or stepper failure, etc....)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    32. Re:Environmentally criminal! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      If the OS lets you do that (I don't know, but I'm sure Windows wouldn't), you'd probably crash as soon as you killed the swap file.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    33. Re:Environmentally criminal! by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Hell, I have 120 MB and smaller hard drives hooked up and working. They aren't in regular operation, though. It's a collection.

    34. Re:Environmentally criminal! by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      45 minutes in my improvised clean room moving the platters to a different drive and I was able to read the contents

      That's what I was afraid of before I sent 3 old drives to the recycling center.

      So I took a 6 foot long, at least 20 pound metal wrecking bar and beat the shit out of the drives in my back yard until they were bent out of shape and the impacts obviously bent the platters as well. Not to mention the scraping effect on the metal.

      And yes, it was a lot of fun. :)

      On another note, I'm surprised nobody has mentioned using corrosive acid to destroy the drives. Surely that would make the data unreadable?

  9. RBFH by Yoda2 · · Score: 1

    We've been using an RBFH for years to destroy harddrives. Just make sure you have some eye protection.

    1. Re:RBFH by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 2, Funny

      RBFH - is that "Really Big F**king Hammer?"

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    2. Re:RBFH by blackchiney · · Score: 5, Funny

      RBFH - is that "Really Big F**king Hammer?"

      Damn, I just bought a BFH to smash some walls. I wonder if I can upgrade with a serial number?

    3. Re:RBFH by Yoda2 · · Score: 1

      Yes.

    4. Re:RBFH by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      So you went for the Stanley FatMax Xtreme FuBar II instead of the FuBar III? That's a BFH and an RBFH.

      Unless you're into professional demolitions or remodeling, I'd say the smaller is more cost effective for your purposes. I've had my eye on the bigger one for a while, but I can't justify the cost without changing careers (or getting a nice big new account at work).

  10. smithereens might be a bit excessive by cowscows · · Score: 1

    I'm generally happy to drill a few holes through different parts of the platters and then just whack the whole thing a couple times with a hammer. Sure, someone with a the right equipment and a lot of time on their hands could potentially take the drive apart, and pull some data off the undamaged parts of the disk, but my data isn't worth the trouble.

    That being said, I've sometimes smashed them further just for the fun of it, and completely obliterating a drive is a lot harder than you'd originally think. Sure, it stops being functional after you smash it a few times, but it doesn't just bust open and have its guts spill out everywhere. Those little things are solid. It'd be much faster to take one apart with the proper screwdriver set than it is with a claw hammer.

    --

    One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    1. Re:smithereens might be a bit excessive by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      Paranoid jackass that I am, I tend to do both BFT and then (once the platters are lying exposed) I set the whole mess on fire. Trying to burn the whole drive is a huge pain in the ass for the same reason you mentioned above: the outer case is so damn tough.

      If all you've got is a clawhammer though, you might as well use a screwdriver. You need a big ass sledgehammer to crack a drive quickly. Wear eye protection, because crap will start flying off at hyper velocity. I had a piece of board shrapnel actually penetrate a 2x4 in a garage where I was pummeling drives...It didn't go in very far, but I've worn protective gear ever since.

      I tend to only do the full "orgy of destruction" thing for work related drives. The problems with work-related retirements are legion, and the liability is so high that you need to be sure. You can't run a secure wipe on a dead drive, but the platters are fine, so you can't just toss it.

      Likewise, you can't run a secure wipe on the box of assorted drives that's been filling up in the server room for 2 years without essentially building a computer to put them in, and inevitably some will be dead anyway, so you'll have to figure out which ones...Huge pain in the ass.

      A software wipe (in my opinion) is an option when you're passing the computer, fully functional, to someone you know for minimal lucre in exchange. If you're even going eBay, I'd be leery of selling the drive.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    2. Re:smithereens might be a bit excessive by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      If all you've got is a clawhammer though, you might as well use a screwdriver. You need a big ass sledgehammer to crack a drive quickly. Wear eye protection, because crap will start flying off at hyper velocity. I had a piece of board shrapnel actually penetrate a 2x4 in a garage where I was pummeling drives...It didn't go in very far, but I've worn protective gear ever since.

      Assuming you're not phobic of firearms, may I introduce you to the modern, smokeless cartridge and associated hardware? Fun, safe (with the right training and equipment). Next time, take a couple of drives to your local shooting range. Fast, effecient, fun. Who knows, maybe you will start thinking about arming bears.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:smithereens might be a bit excessive by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      My local range is actually indoor, and they frown on people bringing in things to blow up.

      I guess I could hike 'em out to the quasi-private area where the local rednecks go to shoot cans (and out of season deer), but it's inevitable that that one time would be the time I ran into their damn worthless security guys.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    4. Re:smithereens might be a bit excessive by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      It's fun to use an arc welder and just burn through drives.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    5. Re:smithereens might be a bit excessive by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      1) Drill one hole into the case top
      2) fill with rust-filled water (from some bright nails left in a can of water or such)
      3) and and hook it up to an unregulated 12-volt DC supply (like a car battery) on the 12v line
      4) hook up a 6v lantern battery to the 5v line
      5) hook up the ground back to the car battery
      6) hit it with a sledge a couple of times while it's running

      It's fun. Try it some time. I'm not sure nobody will be able to recover anything, but it'll be more trouble than it's worth.

  11. Cool method by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "It sounds extreme, but the only way to be 100% safe is to smash your hard drive into smithereens."

    And I know of a great way to do that.

  12. New security device by Ragein · · Score: 1

    The Disk hammer espescially designed for "wipeing" out those problamatic data stains.

    --
    They fitted George Orwell's coffin with rollers so he could turn over more easily years ago.
  13. An Alternative Approach... by blcamp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Smash An Identity Thief.

    --
    The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
    1. Re:An Alternative Approach... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ooh, you die a quick death
      Ooh, identity theft
      I may be wrong, I don't know why
      I may be wrong but I'll try!

  14. Return merchandise authorization by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

    Because those smithereens contain environmentally harmful materials, they should be recycled - for instance at the vendor from whom a new hard drive is purchased.

    Or just RMA it.
    Dear Seagate, I've only had your drive a few weeks and it smash itself to smithereens.

  15. Stupid by binarylarry · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Or you could, you know, overwrite the bits with new garbage data.

    At work, we've had dealings with data recovery labs and they've never, ever been able to retrieve anything useful.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:Stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda

      That's how I do it.

    2. Re:Stupid by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      At work, we've had dealings with data recovery labs and they've never, ever been able to retrieve anything useful.

      Sounds like they've been able to retrieve some green, paper things. They're pretty useful (although increasingly less so).

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Stupid by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Get a better lab.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  16. Whats the problem with... by TuxThePenguin2205 · · Score: 1

    dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sda Could a disk so written be recovered?

    1. Re:Whats the problem with... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Possibly, a single write of zeroes would leave some residual magnetism. It could not be read with the standard drive head; we are talking government agents and slashdot hardware hackers on a bet here - not your standard identity thief.

    2. Re:Whats the problem with... by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Put it this way ... if it could then your drive would have double the capacity.

      Drive makers aren't stupid.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_recovery#Recovering_overwritten_data

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Whats the problem with... by mevets · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is possible to reread some data from a zeroed (or oned (sp?)) disk. Pretty obscure, but I think it is to do with the threshold values of zero and one. For example, writing a location in sequence with 1,1,0 will result in a measurable [ though below threshold ] difference than if it had been 1,0,0. Seagate and the like do their best to squeeze this to the absolute minimum, thus maximizing utilization of the magnetic disc. I suspect it is much harder to recover anything meaningful from a 1TB platter than from a 5MB platter.

      The other leak is with remapped sectors. Remapped sectors may contain live data, but have been switched out of use because they were unreliable. Flash has the same problem.

      dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/sda takes care of the first problem - if you more paranoid than that, you should probably stop whatever it is you are doing.

      You need a custom tool to access the remapped sectors.

    4. Re:Whats the problem with... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      It's highly doubtful that even a government agency could do it. Certainly nobody is going to be doing it at home, not at the kind of data densities you have on modern drives.

    5. Re:Whats the problem with... by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Instead, change the input parameter to something like if=goatporn.jpg (adjust other parameters accordingly to overwrite the entire drive) and let them recover it.

    6. Re:Whats the problem with... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      It is possible to reread some data from a zeroed (or oned (sp?)) disk.

      No, this is mostly a myth. There is no known instance of anybody doing this, especially not with a modern hard drive with the insane data density they have these days.

    7. Re:Whats the problem with... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Come on people! Zeroing a disk drive only removes half of your data. The other half is unchanged and still perfectly readable!

    8. Re:Whats the problem with... by multisync · · Score: 1

      You can also use GNU's shred. Just make sure to shred the device, rather than individual files, if you use a journaled file system or it may not be completely effective.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    9. Re:Whats the problem with... by geminidomino · · Score: 4, Funny

      Exactly! You have to XOR every bit! :)

    10. Re:Whats the problem with... by s0litaire · · Score: 0

      Linux command corrected: "dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/sda" urandom is better but slower..

      --
      Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    11. Re:Whats the problem with... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It is definitely doable, but you need hardware equipment to get most of the data.
      Some custom written driver might be able to do it, custom firmware could as well. The recovery using the driver would probably be about 17%, firmware probably closer to 45%.
      Sometimes that's enough to figure the rest out. Assuming you have the money and will and don't want people to know you have accessed the drive, the firmware swap is the way to go.
      Don't forget to swap it back~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Whats the problem with... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      No tit isn't, because the technology to create a 1TB drive means the technology to read the difference has to exist.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Whats the problem with... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      It is definitely doable

      If it was that easy, then the manufacturers could just make the drive bigger instead. It simply doesn't work like that.

      Unless you know of a documented case of anyone doing this, ever.

    14. Re:Whats the problem with... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly! But I do it twice for additional protection.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    15. Re:Whats the problem with... by Kilroy · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the state of the art, circa '96.

      http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec96/full_papers/gutmann/index.html

    16. Re:Whats the problem with... by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Drive were quite a bit different in 1996.

      Plus, skimming the text I see no references to actually doing what is described. I case I just missed it, please help me find it.

    17. Re:Whats the problem with... by Kilroy · · Score: 1

      > Drive were quite a bit different in 1996.

      Exactly.

      It's not available as a commercial recovery service now, and I doubt it's practical with readily available consumer grade technology, but that's not relevant for long term security. It's an entirely plausible process that's just going to get easier with time, and if something still needs to be secret in thirty years it probably won't be. Security isn't always about "can't read this for now", sometimes it's about "can't read this ever."

      56 bit DES keys used to be considered secure by some people because an impractical quantity of effort would be required to crack them. That's no longer the case, and it doesn't seem reasonable to assume that just because it's still hard to read faded bits from a 1996 era drive that it always will be. I bet I could pick the erased bits off the 14" 1979 era platters hanging on my wall with a magnifying glass and tweezers. ;-)

    18. Re:Whats the problem with... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Manufacturers aren't happy with 45% data retrieval rates.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  17. My method by MiniMike · · Score: 2, Funny

    I fill mine with concrete and drop them in the ocean. Stuffed inside an informant, of course.
    Nobody will be getting more information from either one.
    I am intrigued by the clever use of a hammer in the video, I may have to modify my method slightly.

    1. Re:My method by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 1

      I fill mine with concrete and drop them in the ocean. Stuffed inside an informant, of course.
      Nobody will be getting more information from either one.
      I am intrigued by the clever use of a hammer in the video, I may have to modify my method slightly.

      on the hard drive, or the informant?

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    2. Re:My method by ReiDragon · · Score: 1

      It matters which one?

      --
      PouchPC 2.13ghz C2D, 8gb ram, 9800 GT, 1.5tb, Vista Business.
    3. Re:My method by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      The hard drive, after it's inside the informant, from the outside of said informant, of course!

  18. Windows Vista by happy_place · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh I dunno. I've found Windows vista renders most hardware inoperable. At least this state of the art piece of pc I've had under my desk runs slower than ever, now that it's got the latest/greatest os on it. You could bore identity thieves to death with transparent windows and shiny icons.

    --
    http://www.beanleafpress.com
  19. Drill Holes by kannibul · · Score: 1

    I drill holes in the HDD's from work. If they have glass platters, they shatter, done deal. If they are metal, they get a hole all the way through every platter.

    My thoughts - if someone goes through the effort of trying to retrieve data from a drive in that condition, they've "earned" it.

    Maybe I'm ignorant to how some data recoverey techniques are used, but, as far as I understand it, it has to be read from a head while the platter spins. When the head comes across a 1/2" hole, good-bye heads...

    1. Re:Drill Holes by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      I drill holes in the HDD's from work. If they have glass platters, they shatter, done deal. If they are metal, they get a hole all the way through every platter.

      My thoughts - if someone goes through the effort of trying to retrieve data from a drive in that condition, they've "earned" it.

      Maybe I'm ignorant to how some data recoverey techniques are used, but, as far as I understand it, it has to be read from a head while the platter spins. When the head comes across a 1/2" hole, good-bye heads...

      You should then spray WD-40 into it just to make sure. With the WD-40 coating the platter, you can't even run an SEM over it.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    2. Re:Drill Holes by philspear · · Score: 1

      You should then spray WD-40 into it just to make sure. With the WD-40 coating the platter, you can't even run an SEM over it.

      Maybe an ignorant question, has anyone EVER used SEM to get data off a hard drive? And I guess maybe a more basic question: we are talking about Scanning Electron Micrograph, right? I don't know that much about hard drives, it just seems like that would be near impossible to do.

    3. Re:Drill Holes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In addition to drilling several holes all the way through the drive, I take a pair of heavy duty wire cutters and rip / cut as much of the electronic components, wires, etc on the drive as possible. I figure that between those two actions there is very little liklihood of anyone even attempting to get at the data.

      Why not erase the drive beforehand? Most of my dead drives have been low capacity drives (by current standards) taken from old PCs that died suddenly (mine all die of natural causes as my spouse won't let me get a new one until the current machine dies). In each case I was too lazy to temporarily mount them in the new PC to erase them.

  20. Just told my brother this by smooth+wombat · · Score: 3, Interesting

    His PC died due to dust accumulation (fried mobo, dead power supply, fused RAM) and he asked me what to do with his system. I told him the only thing he needed to worry about was his HD. Told him to drill a few holes in the drive, use a blowtorch in those holes if he still had one (he used to work in home remodeling), smash the drive with a hammer and put it in a bag with his used cat litter (they have two cats).

    If someone is desperate enough to want the information on his drive, they're going to have to work for it.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Just told my brother this by thermian · · Score: 4, Funny

      His PC died due to dust accumulation (fried mobo, dead power supply, fused RAM) and he asked me what to do with his system. I told him the only thing he needed to worry about was his HD. Told him to drill a few holes in the drive, use a blowtorch in those holes if he still had one (he used to work in home remodeling), smash the drive with a hammer and put it in a bag with his used cat litter (they have two cats).

      If someone is desperate enough to want the information on his drive, they're going to have to work for it.

      Well that depends, what breed of cat?

      --
      A learning experience is one of those things that say, 'You know that thing you just did? Don't do that.' - D. Adams
    2. Re:Just told my brother this by Alain+Williams · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well that depends, what breed of cat?

      Civet of course - you then get to enjoy the coffee.

    3. Re:Just told my brother this by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Just hide it in a house in the Gaza strip and tip off Israel that it is a Hamas stronghold

    4. Re:Just told my brother this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just hide it in a house in the Gaza strip and tip off Israel that it is a Hamas stronghold

      Or donate it to a UN-run school in the Gaza strip instead.

    5. Re:Just told my brother this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the point is...if they're desperate enough to want that information, they won't even bother, and they'd have the information already.

      If you're in a position that requires a high amount of security to your data, then ensure you have something like a degausser.

      The average Joe Schmoe really doesn't need to go further than formatting the drive. If someone's after your information, they've already got it.

      Do you also recommend that he and only he swipes his credit card at merchants and that he doesn't do any online transactions whatsoever?

    6. Re:Just told my brother this by lewko · · Score: 1

      ...And have they been background checked?

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
  21. Formatting by mingbrasil · · Score: 0

    why not try a low level format?

  22. Why break a sweat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when there is a drive deguasser a few steps from my station.

  23. Shredder by iCharles · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I periodically contract with a company to dispose of old hardware for my company. The first time i talked to them, they mentioned they shredded old media. I assumed he meant floppies and tapes and the like. Given the nature of the material, it didn't seem that impressive, but certainly nice. When I got the estimate, I was a bit shocked--why was it so high? Then they explained--by "media," they meant hard drives. They sent me a PDF on the equipment. Hard drives are removed from machines, and placed on a conveyor belt. This fed the hard drive into the shredder. On the other end, bits of metal came out. I begged them to let me operate it--just for one or two drives. Damn lawyers!

    1. Re:Shredder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I saw this at a recycling company near where I work, they are subcontracted to dispose of drives for a legal firm, each time apparently the legal firm sends a man with a camcorder to record it being done.

      It's like a wood-chipper, but for metal... I'm glad I didn't hear the noise it must make...

    2. Re:Shredder by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Interesting
      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:Shredder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but will it blend!

    4. Re:Shredder by rivaldufus · · Score: 1

      That's the most wonderful thing I've seen in years... I now have visions of SAS drives, containing sharepoint, exchange, and ms sql installations, rolling down the belt to the shredders.

    5. Re:Shredder by iCharles · · Score: 1

      You've totally warmed my heart.

    6. Re:Shredder by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      This site has hard drive shredding and a *lot* more:

        http://www.ssiworld.com/watch/watch-en.htm

      One of the more impressive ones, I thought, was shredding a steel barrel full of concrete and another one shredding carpet.

  24. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by kcelery · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Throwing into fire is not enough, the magnetic domain on the platter is still there for highly technical team to retrieve. You have to melt the hard disk into liquid and stir thoroughly.

  25. Article or Ontrack Promotional Video? by AngryNick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There was nothing of substance in the video. The guy smashed his drive, Ontrack said it was smashed and couldn't be recovered...but then went on to say, "But we are really good at restoring water damaged drives!"

    The whole discussion is made pointless when Ontrack says, "Oh, we can't restore a zero'd drives either."

    1. Re:Article or Ontrack Promotional Video? by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 1

      They also happen to be very good at recovering data from smashed drives. They just don't make that very public. I got to hear the Kroll/OnTrack VP speak one time at a small forensic conference. Spooky stuff. These are the guys that do data recovery for the FBI/CIA/NSA. They aren't just good at what they do ... they are unbelievable. Me, I am not important enough to care about. I write mine over three times, then open up the drive and score the each side of each platter a number of times with the screw driver I opened it with. I know they still could get the data if they wanted it, but I figure I am not worth enough to even care about. If I were, I would melt them down and cast busts of Dear Leader with them. It isn't that hard to make a charcoal fed 2000 deg furnace for under $50.

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  26. Sure, it works, but ... by Auroch · · Score: 1

    Seriously, can't we feed starving children with these obselete hard drives?
    Or cure cancer, or aids by grinding them up and snorting the powdered hard-drive?
    We could donate them all to nigera to kickstart their fledgling tech-as-infrastructure construction economy!
    Or reverse the polarity of the magnetic field of the sun by launching the magnets into the sun
    Or use them as anger management therapy for behaviour therapy kids ....

    --
    Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
  27. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by bytethese · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like my hard disk shaken, not stirred...

  28. Office space... by Stormshadow · · Score: 1

    PC LOADLETTER, What the hell does that mean?!

      Drag it out in a field with you, a few friends, a baseball bat with some good angry background music.

      That said, rifles are much better for this. 5.56mm AP rounds do really cool/fun things to HDs :)

  29. dban or the grinding wheel by Wansu · · Score: 1

    I agree with the other posters about dban. For most hard drives it is the best choice.

    Magnets are not reliable and because they may render portions of the media unreadable, you can't tell whether everything was wiped.

    I had an old SCSI hard drive that dban could not write to. I disassembled it and ground each disc into dust with a grinding wheel.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  30. Smash....no. by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

    Smashing the hard drive is not good security it's way to easy to read your data. The only way to be sure is to melt it into slag.

  31. Some ideas for destruction by necro81 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Revision3's Systm show had an episode that suggested some ways for destroying a hard drive yourself. They took the position that using a program like Boot'nNuke, which overwrites data 1-N times at your choosing, is sufficient to sanitize data without destroying the drive.

    If you want to go the nuclear option, they demonstrated some favorites: mangling the platters in a vice, dremel or hand grinder, propane or cutting torch, melting it in thermite, etc.

    A hospital I worked for once, when decommissioning old computers, would take the hard drive over to a drill press and put a couple holes through it. Nowadays I think they've bought a drive shredder.

    1. Re:Some ideas for destruction by khallow · · Score: 1

      melting it in thermite

      This has my vote. If you're going to destroy a drive beyond any chance of recovery, thermite is it. Any part of the drive platter that somehow survives the thermite will be demagnetized by the heat.

    2. Re:Some ideas for destruction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The drill press works wonders, especially on drives with glass platters. I now have several 'shaker eggs' that look like hard drives.

    3. Re:Some ideas for destruction by DrVomact · · Score: 1

      I just take my old drives out to the shooting range, and put about a half dozen 12 gauge shotgun slugs through them. I dunno how secure this is, but I haven't had anyone express undue interest in my private data lately.

      Hey, they make special drive shredders? People pay to use them? Hmm...I think I have an idea for a fun business...

      --
      Great men are almost always bad men--Lord Acton's Corollary
  32. Recovering data from a wiped drive by RabidChicken · · Score: 1

    Is there a single case of someone being able to recover usable data from a drive that was properly wiped more than once with random data? More importantly, has there ever been a case that DOESN'T involve advanced recovery tools that only governments have access to?

    1. Re:Recovering data from a wiped drive by ciderVisor · · Score: 1

      Is there a single case of someone being able to recover usable data from a drive that was properly wiped more than once with random data?

      More to the point, has there ever been a single case of someone being able to recover usable data from a drive that was wiped once with random data (or even plain zeroes) ? Peter Guttman has caused years of unnecessary paranoia and disk wear-and-tear with his article.

      --
      Squirrel!
  33. target practice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me an old hard drive would make great target practice as well...

  34. My personal favorite by Alien54 · · Score: 1

    1) dismantle the drive and twist the platters with heavy pliers into the shape of an ash tray

    2) drill through the platters several times (with a half inch/ 1cm drill), then let soak in a bucket of salt water for a month to corrode everything together.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  35. Save some parts by necro81 · · Score: 1

    If you do decide to go nuclear on your old drive, take it apart and salvage some parts first. The magnets used in the voice coil (which positions the read arm over the platters) are pretty strong and handy to have. The motor for the platters is compact and powerful and very smooth.

    If you are satisfied to just wipe the drive, but not destroy it, and you have no further use for it, may I suggest making wind chimes from the platters.

  36. I'm going to fight it, but I'll let it live. by xpuppykickerx · · Score: 1

    What about my dynamite?

  37. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The platters don't have to be melted, they only need to be heated to the Curie point to loose all their information. Of course, that would still take a pretty hot fire.

  38. Just wipe it once by GFree678 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Really, there's no need to wipe it more than once unless you honestly think it will matter. At least these guys think so:

    http://16systems.com/zero

    1. Re:Just wipe it once by Shinatosh · · Score: 1

      If You were a company that lives of recovering data, and would happen to know the answer for this challenge, would You release to the public the method You have used to recover the data for some $500 dollars and a drive You have hacked useless?

      --
      :)
    2. Re:Just wipe it once by GFree678 · · Score: 1

      The bit about having to public disclose the method used for recovering the data is something I missed, which is probably not worth $500 if it was part of a company's secret strategy for recovering drives. You make a good point. :)

  39. Big nail? by AntEater · · Score: 1

    If I'm going to throw a drive away, I zero the partitions out and then drive a big 16 penny nail through the enclosure & platter(s). When it's done, it sounds like a box of crackers when shaken. I'd rather see things reused or recycled but what demand is there for a 1.2Gb drive these days?

    --
    Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
  40. Thermite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or small amount of thermite over the platters and ignite. Result platters will be a molten pool of slag.

  41. Give the disk to my girlfriend . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny

    . . . and tell her to put it in a safe place, and that you might need it later.

    It's gone forever.

    There is no chance that anyone will ever have access to that disk again.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Give the disk to my girlfriend . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . . . and tell her to put it in a safe place, and that you might need it later.

      It's gone forever.

      There is no chance that anyone will ever have access to that disk again.

      It's not gone.. she's saving it as evidence.

  42. pr0n by Tx · · Score: 1

    My theory is that filling the drive repeatedly with porn videos will sufficiently destroy any personal data by overwriting. Therefore all drives should be relegated to porn storage duties for at least one year before disposal. That's not a server full of porn in the corner, it's a data security device!

    --
    Oh no... it's the future.
  43. Curiosity + something shiny = doh! by MindKata · · Score: 1

    "It would certainly make smashing a hard drive to smithereens more interesting." and "I wouldn't recommend it though."

    I pulled an old dead hard drive apart about 15 years ago, giving me an interesting shiny metal disk and a motor to play with. I had another drive die about two years ago, so I did the same. Only this time, forcing out what i thought was a metal disk, did indeed give an surprise I wouldn't recommend ... this time, it was glass, which I only realized at the point it shattered and sprayed me with a shower of razor shape shards! Thankfully I still have my eyesight. Still, turning it into smithereens was indeed more interesting. :)

    Curiosity (nearly) Killed the Cat. :)

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:Curiosity + something shiny = doh! by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

      Happened to me as well. I don't think I've ever read about glass platters anywhere, but they definately shatter well when they go. I too, survived with my eyesight.

    2. Re:Curiosity + something shiny = doh! by idontgno · · Score: 1

      According to this article, IBM switched over to glass substrate in consumer hard drives circa 2000. The surface of the platter is smoother so R/W head flight height can be lowered to accommodate higher data density.

      Which is why I thought the consumer-level advice "hammer your hard drives" may be a bad idea if Joe Bag'o'donuts uncases the platters first. Can you say lawsuit for glass splinter injuries?

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:Curiosity + something shiny = doh! by PsychoElf · · Score: 1

      Just have Joe Sixpack do it instead!

    4. Re:Curiosity + something shiny = doh! by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Put an old cloth towel under it and another on top of it, and make sure they overlap a good deal. You should be fine.

  44. I did this by DeathKnoT · · Score: 1

    I totally did this with about 100+ harddrives with a sledgehammer where i work it was really fun.

  45. Much more cathartic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take your old hard drive out to the shooting range. Don't bother with a plinker like a .22LR... Get something that has some serious kinetic energy like 230 grains of American .44. Holes... Heat... Distortion... Geeks with Guns --- GOOD!!

  46. Will it... by wpiman · · Score: 1
    Will it blend? That is the question.....

    We need to forward this to Tom Dickinson...

    1. Re:Will it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already tried that, but his "Suggestions" form doesn't seem to work on firefox.

  47. SecureErase is built into Drive Controller by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Weird, not a single commenter knows that there is a secure erase function built into the drive controller of ALL hard disks. All that you need to do is activate it: http://cmrr.ucsd.edu/people/Hughes/SecureErase.shtml

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  48. Protect your identity when moving to a new compute by portnux · · Score: 1

    Or just do what I do, keep the harddrive. Store archival data to it, label it and stack it with others on the shelf.

  49. just how paranoid are you? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    Simply deleting the files doesn't remove the file data from the hard disk, all it does is remove the directory entries. That's why undelete utilities can work. If you delete the entries from the 'trash can' this makes the disk space that was used to contain the file data available to be over written, but until new files actually DO overwrite the space formerly occupied by the deleted files the data is still there. It would take some geek effort to reconstruct the data by stringing the correct sectors together in the correct order. Something like gluing documents from a paper shredder back together again.

    Formating a hard disk doesn't write over EVERYTHING, it does zero out all the directory sectors, and all the allocation tables. What the format operation should be called is 'make file system', which is what Linux actually DOES call this command. Under the Linux mkfs commands there is an option to write some data pattern (or just 'zeros') over every sector that will be used for file data when creating a file system. This can take hours on a large hard disk, but it is what you want to do to make sure your data is really erased from the hard disk. Another way is to perform a complete low level format, this requires the disk drive makers own software tools.

    Even if you actually DO over write the entire disk with some data pattern it might still be possible to recover the data, but this will require special hardware to perform an analog read of the disk and special DSP software to re-construct the data from what ever latent image remains on the disk. This is true CIA type stuff, unless you are on the FBI's most wanted list no one is going to go through that kind of trouble to read data off your thrown away hard disk!

  50. Which - not exactly authoritative by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    'Which' in the UK are an interesting bunch. Most people that subscribe think very highly of their thorough testing and methods until they read something on a subject they understand and then they realise they're by and large clueless. I've lost count of the number of people I know who used to praise them until their pet subject got featured be that HiFi, computers or washing machines. At that point, they generally cancel their sub.
    This very article pretty much confirms that as 'experts' all say Which was going too far.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
    1. Re:Which - not exactly authoritative by vakuona · · Score: 1

      Strange. I could say the same thing about Wikipedia.

  51. My favourite method for 3.5" HDDs - the best imho by Qbertino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    - Take old drive.
    - Screw drive apart. (Might require Torx screwdriver or bit)
    - Take percision manufactured aluminum seperation washers and use them as keyrings, strap-loops or simular stuff.
    - Take drive platters and work over them with fine grained sandpaper.
    - Move head magnets over them a few times.
    - Work over them with even finer grain afterwards.
    - Dishwash platters and polish afterwards.
    - Dry and clean platters.
    - Precisely glue thick undied felt to one side of platter using cut-to-fit carpet tape.
    - Cut out platter shape and hole with a sharp knife.
    - Use and/or sell as avantgarde design coasters (10$ - 12$ a piece).
    - Bring the rest of the dives to recycling, seperating electronics from scrap metal first.

    No way anybody will recover any usefull data of a platter after this treatment. And the platter will look like in mint condition. And they make way cool coasters.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  52. Say hello to the 10lb sledge! by Kostya · · Score: 1

    When I moved across the US a year ago, I had a ton of older hardware and less room to move into (house to apartment). Basically, I gave everything away that I wasn't actively using.

    Rather than muck about with secure erasing or degaussers, I just took the dozen drives out to the shed and beat the daylights out of them. Most of my machines were in various states of not running--so the amount of time I would have had to spend putting together a working machine, swapping around more than a dozen older drives, running secure erase on them ... well, it just seemed a lot simpler. There was no way I was giving intact hard drives to random people I did not know, especially drives that may or may not have been erased enough.

    I recommend safety goggles. Some of the boards tend to shatter and send little bits flying everywhere :-)

    Could some super spy possibly lift data? Maybe. But no ID theft script kiddie will. I saw it like using a paper shredder--only a lot more fun. Sure, some super spy agency might be able to re-assemble shredded documents or lift data from the mangled platters of my drives--but why should I be worried about them? They already have a current file on me, I'm sure--they don't need old drives ;-)

    A friend of mine put it nicely: "There's nothing like the feeling of raw destruction you can wreak with a 10lb sledgehammer." It's right up there with using a proper chainsaw. Deconstructing stuff is *fun* :-D

    If I am ever worried about super-spies, I look forward to discovering the wonderful destructive power of thermite :-)

    --
    "Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
  53. recycle it by space_jake · · Score: 1

    I found a local place recycles old computer equipment. For hard drives they use a drill press with what looks like a bit the width of a 50 cent piece that presses the cyclinder or whatever the piece on the hard drive through the other side.

  54. DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Forge · · Score: 5, Informative

    I read years ago (and I'm sure it was made up) of a memo sent out to IT managers in the DOD (United States Department Of Defense). It went.
    To properly dispose of hard drives which may contain Top secret information is a 5 step process to be performed in the order specified and by competent engineers.

    1. Perform a triple overwrite security erase on the entire disk.
    2. Use a bulk degausser (AKA a powerful electro magnet).
    3. Crush the drive under a roller or tank tracks, whichever is more convenient.
    4. Melt the scrap into slag.
    5. Bury that Slag in a toxic waste dump to deter any attempts at data recovery.

    That's not exactly how it went but I think this is pretty close. Can anyone find the original?

    --
    --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    1. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Thiez · · Score: 1

      Step one and two should be sufficient. Also if you do step four you can skip all the other steps. Dumping the remains of a harddrive that has been overwritten three times, degaused, crushed, and melted into slag into a toxic waste dump seems like a useless step from a security perspective but may make sense if the slag contains toxic waste.

      I very much doubt they do all those things.

    2. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by penguinboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      There's no original because that's not the spec.

      The real spec is DoD 5220.22-M, available at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/522022m.htm.

    3. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by RandoX · · Score: 5, Interesting

      About a decade ago, our artillery unit did do "rollovers" on hard drives for the intel unit. The drives, although already drilled through, were stored in a safe and ecsorted by Military Police. After we ran them over, the pieces went back into the safe. After the drilling and crushing, the drives were to be put into a 55 gallon barrel (along with wood or paper), doused in fuel, and burnt for a minimum of 30 minutes.

    4. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by aliquis · · Score: 1

      It would seem like step 4 would be plenty, what good is three overwrites compared to that?

    5. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by aliquis · · Score: 4, Funny

      .. and that's how the Pentium bug came into existence.

    6. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by DeadManCoding · · Score: 1

      The actual correct destruction method is as follows:

      1. For floppy disks, remove the plastic covering and shred the disk. It's highly recommended that you use the bulk eraser prior to shredding the disk.
      2. For hard drives, bulk eraser multiple times, followed by destruction of the drive. It's been a while since I saw the video, but literally tearing the drive apart is required.

      FWIW, I was never in the DoD, I did some short contractor work and was required to watch a video on the proper discard of storage devices. It was a really bad imitation of Bill Nye for DoD types.

      --
      "The only constant in the universe is change." - Unknown author
    7. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      I very much doubt they do all those things.

      You're just jealous because you don't have a tank.

      Admit it.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      I love this sort of double standard. When you want to erase a hard drive, it takes these sorts of extreme measures. But when the hard drive fails on its own, your data is toast! You might be able to get one last gasp by putting the drive in a freezer, but that's it.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    9. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by iron+spartan · · Score: 1

      Since when has anything that the government done been required to make sense?

    10. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by speederaser · · Score: 1

      You have to understand, the procedure is a general one set up for large organizations where each step might be performed by different people in different places. I.e, it's not likely the IT group has a tank available for crushing the drive. Each step along the way is only to safe the drive for the next step.

    11. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by DeskLazer · · Score: 1, Funny

      you forgot 2 steps.

      1. Perform a triple overwrite security erase on the entire disk.
      2. Use a bulk degausser (AKA a powerful electro magnet).
      3. Crush the drive under a roller or tank tracks, whichever is more convenient.
      4. Melt the scrap into slag.
      5. Bury that Slag in a toxic waste dump to deter any attempts at data recovery.
      6. ?????
      7. PROFIT!!!

    12. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by idontgno · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not all of those things, at least in my limited experience, but the last time I was involved with destruction of hard drives with special access classified data, it involved quadruple overwrite (random patterns, etc.), uncasing, very high energy degaussing, scouring off all recording medum with abrasives, and physically deforming the aluminum platters (folding the platters over into quarters and hammering flat). And that's before the media left our facility, bound for an unspecified "final destruction facility", where even more stuff was going to be done to it. I can barely imagine what that might have been; perhaps the final result would have been ingots of aluminum alloy and a box of dross (what was left of the magnetic layer, burned) stuffed into a secure storage facility until the declassification date had passed.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    13. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Thiez · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Am I crazy when I think that when one gets to the point where one is overwriting with random data 10+ times and degaussing afterwards, the chance of some enemy recovering your data is pretty much zero, and the money such a recovery would require would be enough to buy a hundred spies? No point in destroying your data to the point where only divine intervention could restore it when it is several orders of magnitude easier to steal the data before it is destroyed, right?

    14. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      Personally if I had national-security level things, I'd:

      1) Only buy hard drives made in America. Yes spies exist here too, but less national pressure. The non-paranoid may skip this step.
      2) Overwrite the encryption key storage area with 32 passes of shred
      3) Overwrite the entire disk with 4-7 passes of shred then zero it
      4) Smash it and/or melt it down

      Here's the thing. I don't really want to trust either a completely software or completely hardware solution to minimize potential attack vectors. That said, for personal use I just use steps 2 and 3 above.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    15. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by calmofthestorm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Having a tank would make technical support a lot more satisfying:

      C: "Hello, is this technical support?"
      M: "Yes. May I help you?"
      C: "There's a big black thing where my Internet Windower Vista should be"
      M: "Very well sir. Did you turn your computer on?"
      C: "....is that under the start menu?"

      *rumble rumble*.....BOOM!

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    16. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      If you melted it into liquid and stirred it around you wouldn't have to do any over-writing.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    17. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Kilroy · · Score: 1

      One and two are not sufficient for data that someone may be motivated to try to recover, and haven't been for quite a while. See:

      http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec96/gutmann.html

      At the seminar where this paper was discussed, one of the comments was from someone that did steps 1-4 regularly as the only reliable way to delete important data. I'll agree 5) is a bit over the top. ;-)

    18. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Kilroy · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is incorrect and has been for a long time.

      See: http://www.usenix.org/publications/library/proceedings/sec96/full_papers/gutmann/index.html

    19. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by dwillden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know of a facility that doesn't bother with the wipes or degausing, they just take the drives apart and sand the platters clean.

      Then they play with the magnents, figuring out ways to ruin each others credit cards from a distance.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    20. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I crazy when I think that [after all that] the chance of some enemy recovering your data is pretty much zero

      Intel/counter-intel capabilities are generally years ahead of what's known to the public. That's what they spend all that fine $$$ on.

    21. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Woldry · · Score: 1

      divine intervention could restore it

      Now I have to come up with a way to avoid THAT, too? Damn.

      --
      How can a post be modded "overrated" or "underrated" when it hasn't been rated yet?
    22. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I was a contractor at a DOE site. They never allowed any type of storage media or RAM to leave the site. Had a hard ass shredder that would turn anything you tossed into it into sharp metal shavings. Pretty cool. Got to see some iPods go in to it.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    23. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Thiez · · Score: 1

      Has anyone ever actually recovered data that had been overwritten 10 times? Or merely 5 times? Surely if this has been possible for a long time it must be possible for you to point to two or three reliable articles where someone has done this (I couldn't find any, but my google-skills might have failed) and not merely proposed it might be possible in theory.

    24. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      You might be able to get one last gasp by putting the drive in a freezer, but that's it.

      I've pulled off a few magic tricks with dry ice, but you have to watch out for condensation. A block of dry ice on the top and bottom of the drive and leave it in the freezer until it is really cold. Hook it up, keep it wrapped in a towel and HURRY!

      As to the DoD, here is what they want done with unclassified hard drives http://www.drms.dla.mil/turn-in/asdhddispmemo060401.pdf

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    25. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Adam+Hazzlebank · · Score: 1

      1. For floppy disks, remove the plastic covering and shred the disk. It's highly recommended that you use the bulk eraser prior to shredding the disk.

      I would guess with enough effort you could reconstruct the data from a shredded floppy disk. You could image each of the strips http://www.dataclinic.co.uk/data-recovery/hard-disk-microscopy-ii.htm then reconstruct the disk much like they do with shredded paper (e.g. www.iti.gr/files/isspit04.pdf ). Then decode the whole thing in to a disk image.

    26. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by EvilBudMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Those data recovery people are pretty savvy. They just recovered the 18 1/2 minute gap on the Nixon tapes. It is Nixon listening to Alice's Restaurant by Arlo Guthrie.

    27. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why use a shredder... when you can use a blender?

      http://www.willitblend.com/videos.aspx?type=unsafe&video=iphone

    28. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by log1385 · · Score: 1

      My father works at a hospital (where privacy is a big issue), and he says that the IT department has a specific way of disposing of old hard drives. He calls it "the Sledgehammer Method".

      --
      Seek and ye shall find.
    29. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      I love this sort of double standard. When you want to erase a hard drive, it takes these sorts of extreme measures. But when the hard drive fails on its own, your data is toast!

      Fragments of working files are pretty inadequate to the people who own them, compared to the full files, but if the data is sensitive, they can be pretty useful to an opponent, compared to having nothing.

      There are different perspectives at work.

    30. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by feelbad_feelsgood · · Score: 1

      Relevant passage: 5-705. Methods of Destruction. Classified material may be destroyed by burning, shredding, pulping, melting, mutilation, chemical decomposition, or pulverizing (for example, hammer mills, choppers, and hybridized disintegration equipment). Pulpers, pulverizers, or shredders may be used only for the destruction of paper products. High wet strength paper, paper mylar, durable-medium paper substitute, or similar water repellent papers are not sufficiently destroyed by pulping; other methods such as disintegration, shredding, or burning shall be used to destroy these types of papers. Residue shall be inspected during each destruction to ensure that classified information cannot be reconstructed. Crosscut shredders currently in use capable of maintaining a shred size not exceeding 1/32 inch in width (with a 1/64 inch tolerance by 1/2 inch in length) may continue to be used. However, any crosscut shredders requiring replacement of the unit and/or rebuilding of the shredder blades assembly must be replaced by a crosscut shredder on the latest NSA Evaluated Products List of High Security Crosscut Shredders. The list may be obtained from the CSA. Classified material in microform; that is, microfilm, microfiche, or similar high data density material; may be destroyed by burning or chemical decomposition, or other methods as approved by the CSA.

    31. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It probably is but... What do you do with the drives afterwords? You sure are not going to sell them on ebay. You might as well melt them down and recycle the aluminum.
      Each of the steps is there to make sure that if one or more of them is skipped the data is still gone.
      What happens if the overwrite software fails but doesn't give an error? Will that overwrite software overwrite bad/locked out sectors?
      What if the degausser failed and nobody noticed?
      What if the media remover missed some?
      Hey if ACMs with nuclear weapons can be loaded on a B52 by mistake then any mistake can happen. All these steps are safeguards for failure of other steps.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    32. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by maxume · · Score: 1

      One easy way to justify it is to say that it makes the drives safer to move around up until the point that step 4 is carried out.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    33. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Kilroy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Has anyone ever gone to Mars or brought peace to the middle east? Surely if this has been possible for a long time it must be possible for you to point to two or three reliable articles where someone has done this.

      'Freely available on Google' isn't anything like an equivalent set to 'possible', and things that are merely theoretical now may well be trivial a decade from now. Data that needs to stay secure for the long term can't depend on it being unrecoverable due to current technical limitations; that died with DES. I doubt it would be hard at all to lift data off a 30 year old drive; sure, credit card numbers from the 1970s aren't too useful now, but some things might be.

    34. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by spion666 · · Score: 0

      6. Send the copy of the drive (made before step 1) to your enemy?

    35. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by thegrassyknowl · · Score: 1

      You're just jealous because you don't have a tank.

      I'm jealous because I don't have a toxic waste dump!

      --
      I drink to make other people interesting!
    36. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I crazy when I think that when one gets to the point where one is overwriting with random data 10+ times and degaussing afterwards, the chance of some enemy recovering your data is pretty much zero, and the money such a recovery would require would be enough to buy a hundred spies? No point in destroying your data to the point where only divine intervention could restore it when it is several orders of magnitude easier to steal the data before it is destroyed, right?

      But that is the entire point! If they can be ASSURED that the destruction method is overkill, then they can pay better attention to the other ways that the information could be compromised, such as personnel checks, physical security, etc. Besides, although it is a bit time-consuming, overwriting/degaussing is relatively cheap.

    37. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Thiez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Has anyone ever gone to Mars or brought peace to the middle east? Surely if this has been possible for a long time it must be possible for you to point to two or three reliable articles where someone has done this.

      This Gutmann guy tells us how overwritten data could be recovered. Reading his paper makes one suspect this would all be very easy for one with access to scanning probe microscopy, and he suggests a scanning probe microscope could be built for as little as $1400. The paper has been 'in the wild' for over 10 years now. Why can't I find any articles wherein his techniques have been used to recover just a single sector that has been overwritten 5 times? By the looks of it such an experiment could be performed for relatively little money, and any university who would do such an experiment would gain much publicity. Either nobody has ever tried this very cheap and easy thing that would make that person very famous, or it is impossible.

      Which makes it, off course, completely different from going to Mars or bringing peace to the middle east. The former is extremely expensive, and nobody knows an acceptable way to solve the latter. Neither of these problems apply to the paper you mentioned, or so the writer suggests.

    38. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

      pfft they don't do that at all. Any given hdd could have any level of security on it at any given time. Hard drives, like all "excess property" goes to a DRMO (defense reutilization marketing office) where they are either distributed out to other units who could re-use it or disassembled completely. Circuit cards are even cut up for the elements.

    39. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by laptop006 · · Score: 1

      Just? Arlo mentioned that in the 1997 re-release?

      --
      /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
    40. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by CheshireDragon · · Score: 1

      Well, that's easy...simply, do nothing :D

      --
      "That's right...I said it."
    41. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "If you melted it into liquid and stirred it around you wouldn't have to do any over-writing."

      That's security by overlying.

      Each of those steps (specially the last ones) are by themselves more than enough for the data being unrecoverable... IF properly done. Then you have deep security by overlying them. See:

      Overwriting the disks with random data is probably good enough... unless the software somehow fails in an unnoticed manner (it doesn't write anything, for instance).

      But then, you degauss the platters wich, again, is enough by itself, in case the software overwriting did in fact failed. But what if GI Joe took a door stopper instead of the degausser? You know, nowadays, GI Joe troopers are not PhD's all of them.

      But then, you take the still entire HD and take *off the premises* to physical destroy it. What if the HD gets lost on its trip (I knew I shoulda taken that left turn at Albuquerque)? You'd better have the disks free of secret data by that time.

      And then, what if the unforeseen happens and the people in charge of the physical destruction is bought by the enemy? You'd better chain at least two unrelationed means to destroy it (like, first pass a tank over it and then send it to a smelter) and attach them by a paper track so if step 1 tries to send it to the enemy (on the slim chance that rewriting and degaussing failed), then step 2 will ask were the advertised HD were.

      You know, plan as a pesimist, execute as an optimist.

    42. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by dashslotter · · Score: 1

      with today's hdd capacities, overwriting a drive 10+ times will take weeks, if not months. Smashing is one answer. Full disk encryption with disposable keys is another.

      --
      I was flipping bits on an abacus, newb.
    43. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I crazy when I think that when one gets to the point where one is overwriting with random data 10+ times and degaussing afterwards, the chance of some enemy recovering your data is pretty much zero, and the money such a recovery would require would be enough to buy a hundred spies? No point in destroying your data to the point where only divine intervention could restore it when it is several orders of magnitude easier to steal the data before it is destroyed, right?

      But, that's how Bush and Companies emails disappeared...

    44. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Forge · · Score: 1

      So is crushing with a tank when you (the US Military) also run a tank driving school.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    45. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by stanjam · · Score: 1

      Still, this is not easily done...at all. It requires expensive equipment. If you aren't getting rid of classified sensitive material, overwriting 7 or more times will provide adequate protection. For classified material, you go to extremes, just like a simple one way shred of a document is not enough. Cross cutting isn't enough, as it may be possible to one day get information from those sheets. Instead, shred and burn.

      --
      Open Source: Eroding the Digital Divide
    46. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5-705. Methods of Destruction. Classified material may be destroyed by burning, shredding, pulping, melting, mutilation, chemical decomposition, or pulverizing (for example, hammer mills, choppers, and hybridized disintegration equipment). Pulpers, pulverizers, or shredders may be used only for the destruction of paper products. High wet strength paper, paper mylar, durable-medium paper substitute, or similar water repellent papers are not sufficiently destroyed by pulping; other methods such as disintegration, shredding, or burning shall be used to destroy these types of papers. Residue shall be inspected during each destruction to ensure that classified information cannot be reconstructed. Crosscut shredders currently in use capable of maintaining a shred size not exceeding 1/32 inch in width (with a 1/64 inch tolerance by 1/2 inch in length) may continue to be used. However, any crosscut shredders requiring replacement of the unit and/or rebuilding of the shredder blades assembly must be replaced by a crosscut shredder on the latest NSA Evaluated Products List of High Security Crosscut Shredders. The list may be obtained from the CSA. Classified material in microform; that is, microfilm, microfiche, or similar high data density material; may be destroyed by burning or chemical decomposition, or other methods as approved by the CSA.

    47. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by lewko · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point.

      Let's say you found a cockroach in your kitchen. You could simply spray the cockroach.

      Or you could cover it in so much bugspray, it resembles Mount Everest, then light it. Then step on it. Then relight it, up to ten times (depending on the classification of the cockroach).

      Either the way, the cockroach is dead, but come on!

      --
      Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    48. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Kilroy · · Score: 1

      I can't find any accounts of anyone failing either. Generally when universities do research it gets published either way. I wonder if that means that...just a sec, someone's knocking at my dooCARRIER LOST

    49. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Those data recovery people are pretty savvy. They just recovered the 18 1/2 minute gap on the Nixon tapes. It is Nixon listening to Alice's Restaurant by Arlo Guthrie.

      But, since he got Alice, can't the restaurant return to normal?

    50. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Or you could cover it in so much bugspray, it resembles Mount Everest, then light it. Then step on it. Then relight it, up to ten times (depending on the classification of the cockroach).

      I guess the second option makes sense if you enjoy cooking in ground zero of what will be known as 'the great ecological disaster of 2009' for generations to come. On the bright side, there will be no life within a 10 mile radius to interfere with your kitchen.

    51. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Algan · · Score: 1

      Why complicate things? Here's the one step, 100% sure way of taking care of the problem:

      1. Use thermite

      --
      If con is the opposite of pro, is Congress the opposite of progress?
    52. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by tbuskey · · Score: 1

      I work in a DOD type environment.

      Everything has to be approved by "inspectors". They've never heard of DBAN. They have heard of some wiping app that charges a per wipe fee.

      The fee is about $100/drive. You need to spend some time performing that wipe. You need a spare machine to hook it up to. DBAN, if it was approved by the "inspector" would still require time.

      We have a special support contract for repairing drives that allows us to not return the failed drive.

      On the other hand, a new drive is about $100. It will have higher capacity; we're limited in the number of disks we can put in a system after all. We have a disposal system for classified materials that burns & shreads already. Drives won't add to that cost.

      In our environment, wiping just isn't worth it.

      At home, I'll use DBAN. I don't place as high a value on my data.

    53. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      step 6 is prove that there is no god.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    54. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by kf6auf · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why bothering writing over a disk 5 times with zeroes. Generally, the read out from a bit is something like 0.980 or 0.020, which is obviously a 1 or a 0 (respectively), but look like they used to be a 0 or a 1 (respectively) before the last time they were overwritten or else they would look like a 0.995 or 0.005 or something. So wouldn't it make more sense to alternating writing over with 0's with 1's so that it would even harder to recover.

    55. Re:DOD Guidlines. Re:"The only fireproof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude,

      accept the past.

  55. On a smaller scale... by RandoX · · Score: 1

    I've effectively "safeguarded" several hard drives at my local rifle range. Now that's a fun day out.

  56. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by tsalmark · · Score: 1

    I think the torpedo dog was referring to the probable typo in the anchor text.

  57. Fifteen years ago the air force... by doug141 · · Score: 1

    took the platters out and used a grinder on them to remove the surface.

  58. ...smash your hard drive into smithereens by qwertphobia · · Score: 1

    You mean these guys?

    They probably wouldn't see it coming, but I don't know how this practice will help prevent identity theft. And they look like they might smash back, too :-(

    --
    Never ask for directions from a two-headed tourist! -Big Bird
  59. hard drive smashing party by v1 · · Score: 1

    a place I used to work for got a new IT manager out of retirement, he used to work at a bank. We upgraded the server and a few of the desktop's HDs one week, and next week we held a "HD smashing party" after work. We tore the hard drives apart, removed the platters and beat them with hammers. I don't know what they're made of - some composite, I've heard glass, aluminum, and ceramic tossed around for terms, but they do behave oddly when smashed. They don't shatter, but the surface does splinter when the platter is bent. Possibly glass / ceramic surface on an aluminum disc?

    Overkill for us, we didn't have any really sensitive information on them, but good practice to learn I suppose, and I bet manditory where he came from.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  60. The larger the hard drive, the higher the risk by hacker · · Score: 1

    This is an incredibly stupid idea, UNLESS you're going to securely shred the data contents on the drive itself (i.e. Schneier 7-pass or similar method), and the smash it.

    With drive capacities increasing at a geometric rate every single month, even a pinky fingernail-sized chip could contain 10 gigabytes of data. RECOVERABLE data. Are you going to smash the drive platters into pieces the size of matchsticks or smaller? You'll need to if you want to be sure someone isn't going to recover your data from your pieces.

    Resist the urge to smash, unless you shred first.

    1. Re:The larger the hard drive, the higher the risk by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Not really. Let A = cost of retrieving data from smashed drive. Let B = value of data. Is AB? Probably not for most applications. In which case, hammer treatment is just fine.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    2. Re:The larger the hard drive, the higher the risk by u38cg · · Score: 1

      That is, is A less than B? Thanks for eating my tags, /.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    3. Re:The larger the hard drive, the higher the risk by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

      Seven pass overwrite with ones or zeros, then open the drive up, easily done with a decent set of computer related tools and a decent metal file, hammer and small chisel (for the sometimes difficult to separate items). Then, separate the platters, put a platter in a vice, get a Dremel with a nice stone-like grinding tool, quickly grind to bare metal. Oh, and wear your safety glasses, just in case. I do this for all my old/defunct drives, got it down to a very quick and easy procedure.

  61. This is overthinking. by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    This is like fussing over whether the deadbolt on your front door can resist a shotgun blast when the real problem is forgetting to close the basement windows.

    Or it's flattering yourself that your data is all that valuable.

    The most important thing to do is... just absolutely anything at all. Most of the stories you read about involve e.g. laptops that have been sold with their drives completely intact (and administrators huffing about "but they were supposed to be erased! We had a policy in place and sent out a memo about it!")

    Just put all the files in the trash and empty the trash, and don't worry about some clever hacker with, you know, a copy of Norton. Then you'll be doing better than 99% of all computer owners. If you want to do it right, format the drive, and don't worry about whether you've picked an option that overwrites the files themselves. If you want to do it really right, then use whatever handy utility you know of that claims to write over the whole drive. Just once. With zeroes.

    Woody Allen said "80% of life is just showing up." Well, 80% of security is just doing anything, anything at all.

    Above all, just be sure to delete the files right away. Don't say "Well, I won't bother right now because I'm having my NMR next month and I'm planning to bring the drive with me and let the NMR machine erase it," or "I'll do it tomorrow, after I get out to Home Depot to buy a sledgehammer."

    If, by any chance, you are actually a terrorist and you know that Homeland Security has you under surveillance, then of course it's different. In that case I personally recommend that you leave the drive and files alone.

    1. Re:This is overthinking. by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want to do it really right, then use whatever handy utility you know of that claims to write over the whole drive. Just once. With zeroes.

      I'd quibble over that "With zeroes" part. The problem is that this overwrites each bit with the same value. On a lot of kinds of disks, this leaves behind a lot of disks that have two distinguishable value, which are easily read and interpreted as zeroes and ones, giving the previous data. The data-recovery people have equipment that can read the value of each "bit" to several decimal places, and overwriting tends to leave a portion of the previous magnetization. So instead of bits reading 1.00 and 0.00, they'll read 0.04 and 0.00, for example.

      This is why it's better to use software that overwrites with random values, and does it N times. This way, a string of bits that were all zeroes and ones come out with values like 0.93, 0.02, 0.04, 0.96, 1,.01, 0.08, 0.98, 1.02, 0,91, etc. Each of these is a sum of the last random value and N earlier nearly-erased values, and there's no way to pull out the original bits.

      Of course, this is mostly for when you want to reuse the disk or sell it. If you truly want to dispose of it, melting is probably better, and a lot simpler.

      Or, as others have suggested, install Vista on it. That has a good record of making the disk useless to everyone.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:This is overthinking. by tuffy · · Score: 1

      A single overwrite with zeroes is enough to prevent Ontrack from recovering anything. And if they can't get it back - despite running a business that charges thousands of dollars to pull data off hard drives - what hope is there for some cheap scammer? They'll just move on to somebody else's drive that hasn't been zeroed over before pulling out the electron microscopes.

      Physically destroying hard drives might be entertaining, but I haven't seen any evidence that anything beyond a single overwrite is actually necessary on modern drives.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

  62. Spook? by RandoX · · Score: 1

    "Unless you're a spook or the kingpin of a criminal consortium, there's no need to go out and buy deleting software and no need to put a hammer through the damned thing,"

    What exactly is this supposed to mean? Oh, and I love how a hammer is overkill, but if you're really concerned, just "put it in acid". I don't have a vat of acid sitting around, but guess what I do have? That's right. A hammer.

  63. You'd be surprised by clickclickdrone · · Score: 1

    I saw a documentry about forensic computing and they said they had machines/modified drives etc that could extract data from shards of CD/DVDs, smashed up disk platters and hard drives that had been securely erased (read from residual dta either side of the tracks using modified finer heads). They did say text was much easier than encrypted stuff or images/audio as quite a few inbetween bytes do get lost but on text they had a fairly good recovery rate from burnt chunks of platter and the like.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  64. Marksmanship = good way to dispose HDDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In the past I have found use for old hard drives....
    The firing range. Nothing like seeing was a .50 cal does to a hard drive.

  65. This message by Kludge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...but the only way to be 100% safe is to smash your hard drive into smithereens. [...]

    This message brought to you by the Hard Drive Manufacturers Association.

  66. Drive Disposal Best Practice by Forum-Matter · · Score: 1

    As far I'm concerned, destroying the drive physically is without doubt the safest way to go. Of course, if the drive is still useful I'll wipe it DOD and repurpose it. But when it's time to dispose of those old platters, the drive will meet a harsh end. One of my favorite how-to vids on the topic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAZlFoYa41c

    1. Re:Drive Disposal Best Practice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far I'm concerned, destroying the drive physically is without doubt the safest way to go. Of course, if the drive is still useful I'll wipe it DOD and repurpose it. But when it's time to dispose of those old platters, the drive will meet a harsh end. One of my favorite how-to vids on the topic: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAZlFoYa41c

      Ha - excellent point, and great vid! :)

  67. Just delete your files by KiwiCanuck · · Score: 1

    Most of the time this is sufficient. Data recovery is a pain in the @$$. If the data is actually sensitive (intelligence), then open the case and pass over both sides of the plates with a 0.5T magnet. Smashing the case does not prevent data recovery, it only makes it a little more difficult.

  68. And the Good News Is by PingPongBoy · · Score: 1

    If this is all true, it's good news.

    We've been looking for the ultimate backup solution. If data is really recoverable, then hard drives make a really good place to store data to survive whatever disaster. Of course, saving the advanced reading techniques will be important too.

    --
    Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
  69. Smashing Windows PC's = fighting identity theft by SrWebDeveloper · · Score: 1

    Turns out I've been "fighting identity theft" in the manner this article mentions for years -- I'm a Windows user. Pardon me while I fight a little more with this fucking Vista compu.......... [no carrier]

  70. Which hard drive? by wikinerd · · Score: 1

    Which hard drive? I have gone nearly 100% SSD and flash.

    1. Re:Which hard drive? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Which hard drive? I have gone nearly 100% SSD and flash.

      You've been using SSD for so long that your *previous* generation of hard drives (the ones that you'd be getting rid of, hence the motivation of this article) are SSD as well?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  71. can I have them? I'm making lamps by Uzik2 · · Score: 1

    They make great steampunk lamps.

    --
    -- Programming with boost is like building a house with lego. It's a cool but I wouldn't want to live in it
  72. Pete Townshend school of theft prevention by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    So that must have been what the Who was doing to prevent others from copying their act.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  73. Universal Destruction by Detritus · · Score: 1

    The advantage of physical destruction is that you don't have to care about who made it, the model number, the interface, jumper settings, spare blocks and tracks, dead heads, fried electronics, and anything else that might prevent you from erasing everything on the drive. Hulk smash drive. Problem solved.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  74. Buy a harddrive shredder by mverwijs · · Score: 1
  75. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by VanderJagt · · Score: 1

    Hmm, it seems that the curie point for Iron is 768c while the melting point of aluminum is only 660c, though I bet flashing the surfaces of the discs with heat would demagnetize the iron without melting the aluminum. Me, I like using a set of precision electromagnets to systematically write data all over the drive in a seemingly natural pattern, such as someone repeatedly writing words over top of other words on a piece of paper. Of course, the precision electromagnets I'm talking about are the hard drive heads, and the data patterns I'm talking about are written by freeware hard drive wiping software. q-:

  76. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Retric · · Score: 2, Informative

    Heating a destroys the magnetic domain's long before it melts. As density increases the ability to do data recovery when things go bad keeps decreasing.

  77. Dear o' dear... by GPLDAN · · Score: 1

    My my... how positively non-British of the BBC. How crass.... how american.

    Simply take a screwdriver, remove the encasement, lift the platters gently from the drive, and place them with tongs in the fireplace, carefully sliding the fender aside. Once the platters are completely cooked, pull your finger out and head to the pub to get pissed.

  78. Work for a bank by netsavior · · Score: 1

    I do nerd stuff for a giant bank, when we retire servers or desktops, the hard disks are removed, the rest is sent to a recycler, the HDs themselves are disassembled in-house and destroyed by a third party company on-sight, with video monitoring. Each platter is verified destroyed by hand. It's actually pretty cool to watch.

  79. Total Safety by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    Those who wish to be totally secure need to die. The dead are the only group I know of that never have any complaints about personal security,data security or any other form of security. Or, put another way life=risk.

  80. If you're really bored.. by s0litaire · · Score: 1

    best way to destroy the data is to open the drive casing, wire the platter motor to spin constantly, take out a sheet of Wet'n'Dry sandpaper. Place paper on metal spinning thing till it goes dull and scraped. Remove top platter and invert. Rinse and repeat for all sides of the remaining platters.

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
  81. Mod Parent up by blitzkrieg3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I haven't heard of any software solution that can recover overwritten data.

    Likewise. Barring actually disassembling the drive, I think GP's post is bullshit.

    How can software get past the fact that the hard disk controller will be handing the OS all 0's?

    1. Re:Mod Parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      word. dis 1 is a mong

    2. Re:Mod Parent up by Cormacus · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on this one.

      Does anyone know if you can change the disk controller's sensitivity (probably by changing a reference voltage or a threshold voltage) by modifying the firmware?

      --
      Mon chien, il n'a pas du nez. Comment scent-il? TrÃs mauvais!
    3. Re:Mod Parent up by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I wasn't in charge of the one that got the MSFT format or the single pass, they gave that to some of the younger guys for practice. So it is quite possible whatever software they used just lied to them or they screwed up the wipe. Like I said this wasn't some formal double blind study kind of deal, we were discussing data security and peaked the teachers interest so he got us some toys and let us loose to see what would happen. I was in charge of the DoD and Guttmann machines,since the other guys hadn't even HEARD of DoD-7 or Guttmann and didn't know squat about it.

      As for what tool I was using to try to snatch data off, it was a Linux live forensics CD. I'm at the shop right now and all my school stuff is packed away in my moms closet since the move, but if I had to guess it was Helix, maybe? It was around 2005 so whichever Linux forensics CD was hot at the time was the one I used. The other guys in the class were pretty young and all but one were Windows GUI guys, so frankly I have no freaking clue what tools they used. I do know that most of their software said it recovered "something" but the something was always so much gibberish that frankly I figured it wasn't really recovering squat.

      I know that we didn't get a single usable text file from the one that was 3 wiped with random patterns,the 5 wipe of alternating patterns or the DoD-7 or Guttmann. I am sorry that I just don't remember the specifics of the software and patterns used, but we were frazzled from taking midterms and were doing this to satisfy our curiosity more than anything else. Our security and networking teacher was really good about getting PCs and letting us test theories and get our hands dirty. He would let his class every semester set up a "network" of a server and a couple of boxes and let us try to lock them down before he let loose the "hackers" which was the programming students. Man that was fun. Sorry I can't give you more specifics, but it was just a fun way to blow off some steam and test some theories. Sorry.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:Mod Parent up by kasperd · · Score: 1

      How can software get past the fact that the hard disk controller will be handing the OS all 0's?

      Probably the data wasn't actually overwritten with all 0s. When playing around with emulators at some point in the past I came across a DOS version where the FORMAT command would actually never overwrite the harddisk with 0s. It would read all sectors to find out if there were any unreadable, and then it would write to the metadata areas on the disk.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    5. Re:Mod Parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's how formatting a hard drive usually works. It's called high level formatting (or mkfs in unix speak).

      Low level formatting overwrites every sector, but for hard drives, that's done at the factory, or using software made specifically for that drive (you might be able to download it from the drive manufacturer). Oh, and it takes a lot of time, much more than a (non-quick) high level format.

      Floppy disks are low level formatted at first use, in dos Format a: will both low and high level format the disk. On Linux, fdformat does the lowlevel formatting, and mkfs the high level.

    6. Re:Mod Parent up by kasperd · · Score: 1

      Low level formatting overwrites every sector, but for hard drives, that's done at the factory, or using software made specifically for that drive (you might be able to download it from the drive manufacturer). Oh, and it takes a lot of time, much more than a (non-quick) high level format.

      The format program I saw actually read all sectors on the disk, so it wasn't any faster than it would have been to write all sectors.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
  82. Perfect solution by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Funny

    Put your hard drive in a sock, and toss it in the dryer with a matching sock. You have a 50% chance of it disappearing into an alternate universe, never to be seen again.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    1. Re:Perfect solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I just tried this, and let me just say it works! I heard a clunk clunk clunk, and then all of a sudden it sounded normal. I opened up the drier, and the drive was gone, but the socks remained. A letter was left though, which read:

      Thanks for your docs! - Underwear gnomes

      Is this normal?

  83. Target Practice? by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 1

    I just inherited an M-1 Garand rifle (WWII U.S. infantry standard rifle) and have a pile of old hard drives the need to be wiped. This could be fun.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
  84. No you don't. by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Disassemble the drive and remove the platters. Take sandpaper and sand off the oxide. There's no way in hell any data will be recovered after that.

    Not everyone has access to a furnace hot anough to melt the whole thing.

    1. Re:No you don't. by couchslug · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't forget to harvest the handy magnets if you bother to do it that way.

      Some hard disk platters are glass, so be careful!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:No you don't. by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I built a kiln out of a trash can, ceramic fiber mat, and some venturi propane burners made from 3/4" pipe. I've fired to Cone 4 (2124ÂF - 1162ÂC) in it. Cost about $200 to make. Would be cool to get a crucible and melt down a drive or two. I have some old scsi stuff from the 90's...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    3. Re:No you don't. by Verdatum · · Score: 2, Funny

      hm. I can't find the surface area of a HDD platter, but let's say that 1/3 of the radius of the disk is unwritable in the center. Supposedly, you can get as much as 500GB on a single 3.5'' platter. Now lets say you sand it with 120 grit sandpaper, so that you could rip off a chunk the size of a 120 grit grain of sand....By my math (which could be miserable) one single flake could contain as much as 248k of data, all perfectly recoverable via electron microscope. That's a lot of text! God...this sound like one of those Microsoft job interview questions...

    4. Re:No you don't. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Now assume that the flake contains stacked lines of bytes written in straight lines across the width of the flake (an approximation, since the lines are actually curved but the flake is small). Each line will hold some consecutive bytes, but it is extremely unlikely that any two lines will hold consecutive data from one line to the next. Assuming that the flake is square and all the lines of data are of equal length, how many consecutive bytes can be recovered?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  85. Companies I worked at had me do this by jerryodom · · Score: 1

    On more than one occasion when removing old computers we pulled the drives and destroyed them while donating the old PC's. If you think about it then it's really a no brainer. What's the first thing you do when you get a machine that's come out of no place and been previously used? You snoop around for things.

    --
    For some reason I refuse to use either spell check or the spacebar properly.
  86. Environmental friendliness by ErkDemon · · Score: 1
    Of course, if you're trying to be environmentally friendly, you'll take your star-shaped screwdriver and disassemble the whole drive during your coffee break. All the screws go into your "spare screws" pot, the platters get set to one side for later smashing, and once the chassis is completely stripped back to a bare aluminium block, that goes with all the other alu parts into your aluminium recycling bin.

    You get a totally irrecoverable drive, a warm feeling about the amount of aluminium you just recycled, and a couple of cool high-power magnets to play with as a reward.

    And who doesn't like high-powered magnets? :)

    1. Re:Environmental friendliness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I had in mind was getting another use cycle out of it by putting the disk in another machine, probably doing a different job that required less resources than a desktop computer, before recycling it, which is more environmentally sound.

      Pete Boyd

    2. Re:Environmental friendliness by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, you're probably putting it in a machine that gets fewer operations per watt. Except in systems that are rarely turned on (like museum pieces or spare computers used as guest workstations) it's probably more environmentally friendly to recycle it and use something more efficient.

  87. Shoot it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember, short, controlled bursts.

  88. Honestly, why bother? by gillbates · · Score: 1

    Two men hear that a tiger has escaped from the zoo. The first one reties his shoes; the second asks, "Do you really think you can outrun a tiger?" To which the first replies, "I only have to outrun you..."

    Dumpster diving went out with the 80's. The chances of someone going through your garbage or electronics recycling so as to steal your identity are between slim and Nicole Ritchie. To be safe, just format it once; if you're really paranoid, use a disk wiping utility or "dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/hda".

    Today's identity thieves typically steal your information long before that old hard drive makes it to the recycling facility. So you made a few purchases with your wife's Windows machine. Or perhaps you used a credit card to pay for a restaurant meal. Or maybe your mortgage lender has an identity thief on the inside. Or perhaps your medical records are sold by the overseas employees of the outsourcing firm your doctor used.

    Sure, you can shred your hard drive and/or take a blowtorch to it if you'd like. Some people actually enjoy that sort of thing. But don't think you're safe from identity thieves for having done so.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Honestly, why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dumpster diving went out with the 80's.

      No it hasn't. CC numbers etc are still very easy to find within minutes of DD.

    2. Re:Honestly, why bother? by splatter · · Score: 1

      Seriously, where geographically?

      I do believe your talking out of your ass because as a former diver for phone stuff I am always very aware of card numbers & what gets printed out on receipts. Most retail outlets only print the last four no expiration or any other data, even on ATM receipts.

      The days of having your entire card number on very receipt are long gone.

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  89. This is how the DOE does it. by Pontiac · · Score: 1

    Industrial shredder. It rips the drive down to a pile of metal shavings
    http://www.flixxy.com/hard-drive-shredder.htm

    --
    If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur. --Red Adair
  90. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by somersault · · Score: 3, Informative

    Whoosh!

    The point was that they said this is a "fireproof" way of restoring your data - which is basically saying that throwing the hard drive into a fire would somehow recover the data.

    Foolproof would have been a better word to use; as in "even a fool could protect their data using this method".

    --
    which is totally what she said
  91. RIAA Solution as Well? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    How about when you get that first letter from the RIAA claiming that you may be sued and (according to their lawyers only) you MUST preserve all evidence to make their case against you as easy as possible?

    Or would you rather smash them instead?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  92. Kitchen procedure by flatulus · · Score: 1

    Your electric stove burner is capable of melting a hard drive platter, liquifying it completely. But you might want to have a spare burner and pan to replace the one you've messed up using this procedure. You *can* clean up the mess, but it can be a bit of work.

  93. The Great Zero Challenge Remains Unaccepted by Revek · · Score: 1
  94. Disassemble it by tedgyz · · Score: 1

    I usually just take it apart. I save the magnets - my kids like them and they are cheaper than magnetix.

    I then use the platters as coasters. If anybody wants to retrieve the data at that point, good luck. My data just isn't that important.

    Environmentally, I then dump the metal parts in the metal bin at my town's transfer station.

    --
    "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
    1. Re:Disassemble it by Wiseazz · · Score: 1

      I harvest the magnets as well. We use them for 'fridge magnets. Some people just put pictures and take-out menus on their 'fridge doors - we hang the yellow pages.

      --
      My sig sucks.
    2. Re:Disassemble it by tedgyz · · Score: 1

      LOL! It took me a minute, and then I got the joke. They can be dangerous.

      --
      "No matter where you go, there you are." -- Buckaroo Banzai
  95. 8 lb splitting maul by fantomas · · Score: 1

    Unscrewed the hard drive out of an old computer and put it on a block of wood. Got out my 8lb splitting maul (looks like an axe but fatter wedge shaped head, designed for splitting logs) and gave it a few hearty hits. Seemed to help it spill all the bits and bobs around my back yard quite nicely. Having a really big hammer is the trick. None of your wee bijou designer claw hammers ;-) Probably faster than the usual problem you have with one stubborn screw not coming out. Needed a bit of a sweep up afterwards mind you. I think all the bits of the platters went into the dustbin though perhaps a few small fragments might turn up in the veggie patch when I dig it over in the spring.

    1. Re:8 lb splitting maul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My dad had a 15lb maul. Boy was that ever a beast... I could barely swing it at the time. I wonder if he still has it.

  96. Keep them platters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I disassemble my hard drives, and throw all the parts away with some exceptions: I remove any RAM and flash chips and destroy those (clamped sideways in a vise until it cracks apart) and I keep the disc platters. I have a coffee can full of them now.

    While I doubt some bad guy will try to recover data from a bare platter, supposing he would they are safer with me than in the trash.

  97. Scary mikes prefered method.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Multiple hits with 12ga slugs or other fun large caliber weapons. 12ga slug goes right through mulitple platers bearings and cases. Sometimes multiple hard drives.

  98. Too Simple by rally2xs · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is too simple. You just KEEP your hard drive, throw it in the safe with the guns and the jewelry, because you're going to need some old data off it someday, anyway.

  99. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Metasquares · · Score: 5, Funny

    You must cast it into the fires of Mount Doom! Only then will your data be safe!

  100. DoD sanitization by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depends on the value of the information. Are you willing to spend $500-$10000 on a professional recovery service, or is your information not worth that much? Can it be reconstructed through different means?

    The DoD has to worry about enemies getting ahold of the disk and sending it to a multi-million dollar clean-lab with stuff like electron microscopes and post-doc engineers to recover the information.

    Something properly classified 'Top Secret' is done so on the basis of it being possible for it to cause 'exceptionally grave damage'. IE lives lost, cities nuked, embarrasing the POTUS, etc...

    The reason you destroy the information in so many different ways is in case one of the ways fail. For example, degaussing is often possible in-house, but what if the degausser doesn't work well enough? On the other hand, sending it to a facility capable of smelting it down requires transporting it - an opportunity for it to be lost. So you degauss it first to make it harder to retrieve data in the facility, then send it to the smelter 'to make sure'.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:DoD sanitization by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      embarrasing the POTUS

      So Bush himself is classified Top Secret?

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    2. Re:DoD sanitization by Forge · · Score: 1

      We all have fantasies.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
  101. Turn in your geek card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or small amount of thermite[...]

    A *small* amount of thermite?!? What sort of geek *are* you. Nothing but a great heap of thermite will do.

    (Sure, a small amount would take care of the data, but no geek worth his bits would settle for a small amount of thermite when he has a chance to use thermite.)

  102. Really? by Sylver+Dragon · · Score: 1

    What a load of nonsense.
    1. Download and boot Knoppix
    2. From a root terminal run: shred -vfz -n 25 /dev/hda

    Granted, if it's data I'm paranoid about (financial data) and I don't plan to re-use the hard drive, I'll do the above followed by disassembling the hard drive (with actual screwdrivers, not a hammer) extract the patters and then punch 7.62mm holes in them from 100 yards over the course of a few hours.

    Ya, when you absolutely, positively, need to be sure, nothing beats thorough physical destruction (where'd my thermite go?). However, having every bit randomly written 25 times, followed by every bit being zeroed if probably good enough.

    --
    Necessity is the mother of invention.
    Laziness is the father.
  103. BBC is bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Method 1: Use a "nuke disk" created from something like Eraser to secure erase the entire drive.

    Method 2: Dismantle the drive for the cool rare-earth magnets, and use the shiny platters to adorn your refrigerator or as signalling mirrors.

  104. I used an AR-15 by swb · · Score: 1

    Reasonable target practice at 125 yards. I probably should have used steel core surplus ammo, but the 55gr V-Max bullets did plenty of damage, even when the round hit the platters. I got about 4-5 hits per drive before the drive disappeared beyond the pallet I had it propped on.

  105. Gauss what we do to our drives! by Phoenix · · Score: 1

    Here at the hospital we drag all of the old dead drives over to the MRI suite during a time when they don't have anyone scheduled.

    Wave a drive in a 90,000 gauss field for a minute and it's pretty hard to recover. We tested this by sending it off to a data recovery sppecialist company and they told us that it was irrecoverable.

    The Government might have better luck...but the average person isn't going to get squat.

    Phoenix

    --
    -- Wiccan Army, 13th Airborne Division "We will not fly silently into the night"
  106. Re-entry? Nope. by gdav · · Score: 1

    Impact on hard ground from ten miles up? Nope.

  107. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by ElBeano · · Score: 4, Funny

    When the informatin is "loosed", where does it run off to? Should we have some mechanism in place to catch it before it gets in the wrong hands?

  108. Shoot It by maz2331 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Five shots from a .458 Winchester Magnum firing soft-points really wrecks a drive into smithereens. It's actually hard to find a spot on the platters that isn't either punched through or scratched to near-oblivion by tiny fragments bouncing around inside the thing. Really, they look almost sandblasted where not outright gone.

    And it is a lot of fun, too.

    1. Re:Shoot It by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I used to take old 386/486 chips out and shoot them with a CZ-52 pistol. The little high velocity round would really make 'em shatter. Fun!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  109. DoD standard superceded by NIST's standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's no original because that's not the spec.

    The real spec is DoD 5220.22-M, available at http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/html/522022m.htm.

    The DoD standard has been superceded by NIST Special Publication 800-88:

    http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-88/NISTSP800-88_rev1.pdf
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_remanence

  110. Misleading claim... by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    This is misleading. Wiping and destroying a drive will both work if you do it right, but the physical destruction is risky in that the damage is unpredictable and may be easier to overcome than it looks to a layperson. That makes a software-based wipe much more foolproof. Drives have been restored after being run over by trucks, scorched in fires, doused at the bottom of a river and other things - if you need data to disappear, you don't want to have to rely on "well, this looks good and broken now".

    By contrast, random-overwriting a drive several times will render it impossible to recover anything from it. The plus side is that you still have a working drive.

    Of course it's hard to make that look like an accident. But then, to make sure the disk is physically destroyed you have to break the platters and ideally grind them into powder, and that kind of "accident" won't be very convincing either. (Disclaimer: Withholding information from law enforcement or in a legal investigation under subpoena is a felony in many jurisdictions.)

  111. Not cheap if computer is free by cwgmpls · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hard drives are NOT cheap if your goal turn the computer around for use by someone with low income. I rebuild computers and give them away for free to people who need them. Spending even $20 to replace the hard drive would increase the cost of the computer enough to make it unusable for my purposes.

    Is it really possible to recover data from a disk that has been wiped with DBAN? I highly doubt it -- I've never heard of data being recovered after wiping with DBAN.

    If you want to be friendly to the environment and spread the availability of low-cost computing, don't destroy the disk, use DBAN instead.

    1. Re:Not cheap if computer is free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Hard drives are NOT cheap if your goal turn the computer around for use by someone with low income.

      NOTHING is cheap for someone with low income. File this one under 'duh.'

    2. Re:Not cheap if computer is free by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 1

      It depends on what was on it before. If I was wiping my gaming PC, I'd say it was fine. But I'd never do that for a work computer. The cost of it not working is vastly higher than the cost of a new drive.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    3. Re:Not cheap if computer is free by Kilroy · · Score: 1

      Or just use 'shred', which is part of GNU coreutils.

    4. Re:Not cheap if computer is free by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Drives that have had TS data on them don't get donated anywhere, in one way or another they get destroyed. So your charity while good intentioned will never get drives that have held such data.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    5. Re:Not cheap if computer is free by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Very true, but I kinda hope that organisations dealing with top secret information don't get their security procedures from BBC articles that feel the need to explain where you'd find a hard drive.

      I think that's the point here - anyone who needs to physically destroy their drives probably already does so. Anyone who needs to be told what a hard drive is by 'Which?' magazine would probably be served much better by a quick explanation of actual deletion vs. hitting 'format' or even dumping things in the recycle bin.

    6. Re:Not cheap if computer is free by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice to see I am not the only one that does that. Makes you feel damned good to know that you made someone's life a little better and all it cost you was a little time and brain power, doesn't it?

      And as for the poster that talked about taking apart the platters to try to recover any remapped sectors as SOP, if these machines were headed straight to eBay you might have a point. As I'm sure you can chime in and back me up with cwgmpls, when you give away a machine like that to folks or these little charities that machine is NOT going to end up on eBay, ever. I have often run into folks whom I gave a machine to many years ago, and it is always the same. They will either use it until it literally is completely shot, or more often if they manage to get a hold of something else it gets passed on to a family member who doesn't have one. I have seen some of my rebuilds return to the shop for a repair and they have passed through 4,5,6 family members. Uncles, cousins, sisters and brothers,etc. Poor folks value something that works and will ALWAYS find someone that can use it if they can't.

      And finally allow me to say this: if your company is tossing machines PLEASE wipe and donate them. There are many folks hurting bad right now and barely surviving and those machines could really make someone's life better. it really doesn't take any time at all to ask around your neighborhood and find those in need. The local church, youth center, foodbanks, shelters for battered women, all of these places will be happy to point you toward those that could use them if they can't use them themselves. I have seen with my own eyes how much good these machines can do and how something we take for granted can really help those that have so little. Please, don't further poison our planet by taking running machines and throwing them in the trash. Just a little bit of time and effort can give these machines a new lease on life and make someone's life a little better. And at the end of the day you will know you have made life just a little easier, just a little nicer, just a little better for a fellow human being. Isn't that worth a little bit of your time?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    7. Re:Not cheap if computer is free by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yup, my work donates newer stuff to local school board but all they get is case/logic board/processor/powersupply. They pull ram/drives/video cards. Can also pick up older stuff at auction but it's sold by the pallet, usually for under $100.00. Got a load of old Mac stuff this way but had two nice G5's in there.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    8. Re:Not cheap if computer is free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh really? Cause I'm selling a mint-condition nothing for the low, low price of $4.99!

  112. My solution to rendering the hard drive unreadable by kenj0418 · · Score: 1

    1. Have the Large Hadron Collider create a black hole.
    2. Throw hard drive into black hole
    3. ???
    4. Profit

  113. I like the gas ax method... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oOIf0JmZfrQ

    Plus if you make a sand cast you can have your own Hard Drive Beer Opener!

  114. Just overwrite the data once completely using dd by krakrjak · · Score: 1

    There is at least one outstanding challenge on the internet to recover a drive that has been overwritten just once with zeros. No one has accepted this challenge in over a year. Beyond that we now know that the assumptions that Peter Gutmann made when writing his seminal works in the mid-nineties about data recovery are complete hogwash. Once such assumption is that you know what data it is that you would like to recover. Why would you need to recover the data then if you have perfect knowledge of the data.

    A new paper was published in December showing experimental data to back up how possible/impossible it is to recover data from a drive that has been overwritten once with any known pattern. They show that if you try to recover data from overwritten areas your likely hood of data recovery become astronomically low once you start trying to recover more than 32 bits of contiguous data. Add to that the time required to attempt the recovery. With Magnetic Force Microscopy (MFM) you can scan a disk platter at a speed of 1 byte every 4 minutes. This speed will change over time, but based on the research in this paper that still makes anything more than bit recovery unlikely and would be a huge time sink for anyone with appropriate technology and would most likely yield little useful information.

    I recommend anyone in that deals with hard drive decommissioning read this paper.

    Here's the link to the paper.

    And here's a link to the BibTex entry.

  115. How we declassified disks in the 1980s by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Back in the 1980s and early 90s, when I was working as a tool for the military-industrial complex, I ran a VAX lab that processed classified information. I forget which DoD standard we followed (it was equivalent to Army 380-380), but I got to write our declassification processes and my successor at the job had the fun of implementing them. The basic choices were

    • Officially NSA-certified overwrite software (Didn't exist for our platform.)
    • NSA-certified Big Fscking Magnet (Not near *my* equipment, thank you.)
    • Dissolving the coating in acid (No thanks.)
    • Physical Destruction - Yeah!

    Our building had a machine shop in the basement, and my successor got to take apart the RM05 removable drives (which were about the size of a Tupperware cake carrier and had a dozen 14" platters), and have the machinists sandblast them for her. The canonical Sysadmin Wall Decoration in those days was to have a disk platter with some tracks scratched off it from a head crash; she had one that was clean down to the bare metal.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  116. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It's military - so "lose the dogs of war"...

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  117. DIY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come one guys! We're /.'ers. We build our own degaussers out of tire irons and bailing wire for crying out loud. Hook it up to the batteries of our oversized SUV's and ZAP! no more data (and no more eyebrow hair probably, considering we are /.'ers.)

  118. encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would whole disk encryption work as a safeguard against data recovery? Just encrypt the whole disk (when it's new) using truecrypt, and pick a good password. One advantage might be that if your disk dies, and your computer can't access it anymore, then you're data is still unreadable. When it comes time to get rid of the disk, just erase the mbr.

  119. Two other options... by mlts · · Score: 1

    One option is something I try to recommend, but often times its not doable in practice:

    Don't have unencrypted data on the drive in the first place. TrueCrypt has the capability to overwrite sectors while encrypting to ensure that unencrypted data isn't on the drive. On the Mac, you can use PGP whole disk encryption for similar functionality. For data drives, the latest version of TC allows one to encrypt a volume in place (also offering an option for multiple overwrites.)

    Combine this plus a good password (or use of keyfiles for even better security), and for all but classified data, one can just run a zero pass and call it done. For better security, one can restore a dummy keyfile (overwriting the areas with the volume master key 36 or so times) and unless someone can crack AES-256, they won't be accessing that drive's data anytime soon.

    Disclaimer: Know your threat model, and who might be after your data. For someone who just doesn't want their data to fall in the wrong hands if their laptop is stolen, TrueCrypt or FileVault is more than enough. If someone has stuff that some organization is willing to pay big bucks to try to disassemble it with a SEM, then use one of the techniques mentioned in previous posts to reduce said hard disk to component atoms.

    Another option that isn't mentioned much because its difficult to gain access to it is the low level ATA spec secure wipe of drives. All recently made hard disks have a built in secure erase function that erases on the disk level. A utility, HDDErase (http://cmrr.ucsd.edu/people/Hughes/HDDEraseReadMe.txt) might be usable depending on the computer and how fast the BIOS tells the hard disks to lock down access to the password protection commands. I use this secure erase function with a pass of DBAN to ensure that non critical workstations which are changing owners have blanked drives.

  120. Missing Option by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    Target practice with a high power rifle. As much fun as a three pound hammer, but louder.

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  121. A LAN party I've been to... by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

    ...had a hard drive throw contest. Much more interesting. :)

  122. It doesn't need to melt per se by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

    Well, the plastic stuff will actually melt. However, for the drives themselves it's sufficient for the temperature to get to the Curie point. That's the temperature at which ferromagnetism stops.

    --

    The Raven

  123. Thermite is better than smashing! by fuzzylollipop · · Score: 1
  124. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Bovarchist · · Score: 1

    Only the One Drive reveals its data when exposed to fire, but even then, it's just some crappy poem about Western Digital, Morder, and the Read Heads of Doom.

    --
    Hell is other people's code.
  125. How much for deleting software? by kaosfury · · Score: 1

    "Unless you're a spook or the kingpin of a criminal consortium, there's no need to go out and buy deleting software and no need to put a hammer through the damned thing," Mr Goodwins told the BBC.

    Why? DBAN is free and can be used over and over again.

    --
    "Trust that little voice in your head that says 'Wouldn't it be interesting if...' and then do it." - Duane Michals
  126. Terrible misinformation by canonymous · · Score: 1

    Note that the Great Zero Challenge remains unanswered. Overwriting a hard drive with zeroes will erase all data on it irretrievably (I agree totally that ordinary delete methods would not do so).

    Yes, there have been lots of articles about how overwritten data can be retrieved with various vaporware methods, but no commercial data recovery companies has implemented these. So unless you are paranoid about the NSA using their super secret data recovery methods to find out your hotmail password after buying your hard drive off eBay, it is not necessary to physically destroy a perfectly good hard drive.

  127. high velocity .30 caliaber rounds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My personal favorite method of drive destruction (done a number of times) is by use of a high power .30 caliber rifle (7.62x54r). Old hard drives make wonderful targets since they are smaller than the vital area on most wild game so as targets they can really improve your accuracy. After 10 to 15 holes I highly doubt there is much left that can be recovered by a normal hacker or most professional data recovery services.

  128. Another case of the stupids on slashdot. by sarkeizen · · Score: 1

    http://www.actionfront.com/ts_dataremoval.aspx

    Smashing the drive is likely less effective than overwriting and overwriting is almost impossible to recover from. Even with an STM!

  129. platter in a microwave oven, zap! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remove platter, place platter in to a microwave oven, zap platter... distroy harddrive components by smashing/crushing parts, repeat process. results vary...

  130. Yeah ok by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    http://techreport.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=56926

    recently got back from a small gathering of security experts that work with encryption. We saw a wonderful demonstration of a data security expert performing a challenge. We were asked to bring in a disk drive that had been deployed, wiped, deployed, wiped, and deployed. So I personally did a BSD install, Then Linux, then XP.

    The demonstrator asked if the disk drive was "expendable", I said sure, it was an old 60 gigger. He then opened up the drive's housing and dropped it in a tank of liquid nitrogen. He removed it and smashed the platter with a hammer.

    He took the platters and, as far as I can tell litterally taped them together with Scotch tape.

    He took out a weird wand looking device and started, platter by platter, scanning them in. On the screen we could see the hard disk being reconstructed. It took about 2 hours to "wand" the platters of my demo disk.

    We ajourned for the day as the software went to work. Now I stuck around the lobby and bar for a while and chatted with the demo guy asking what he just did.

    "I used a special magnetic scanning probe to record the contents of the disk platter parts. The liquid nitrogen makes it easier to break the metal rather then bend it to hell. The process still works, it's just more dramatic."

    I asked, "Neat how much does the wand thing cost?"

    "They're not for sale to the public but I'd wager at least 30 grand for one."

    "Ouch!"

    "Spendy isn't it?"

    "No I just sat on my pager... but yes that is sick"

    The next day the demonstration began anew. This time he went off talking about magnetic sub sampling blah blah blah... my drink was watered down and their ameretto was ghetto. He had lots of slides with what looked like oscilliscope output and WAVELETS tossed around on the slides, oh and lots of linear algebra... yuck... But he said the following that caught my attention:

    "based on the way hard drives operate you can think of them much like a printer. They print on a sheet of paper a magnetic pattern to represent a 0 or 1 so to speak rather then ink. So let's imagine that you print a picture of Wayne Newton in black and white on a sheet of paper. You can see it looks like Wayne. (He actually was printing this stuff btw..) Now (putting the Wayne Picture in the printer) I'm going to print a new picture but this time in red ink. (a picture of Tom Jones) now as you can see it's hard to make out Wayne or Tom at this point. But with the right technology you could easily pick out one or the other. But imagine now if you could only print black in on the top half of the page and red ink on the bottom. Or better yet hundreds of little bands on a single page each dedicated to a different color. You could, on the same page write dozens of different pictures, each in a different color. Hard drives do the same. In that small space of the Read Write head hard disks can leave a ghost of the old content. Remember this if anything: YOU'RE DISK WIPING SOFTWARE MUST USE SPECIFIC PATTERNS TO EFFECTIVLY CONCEAL THE OLD CONTENT..."

    Now what sticks out from that? the word CONCEAL. Not erase, not delete, but conceal. I used the gdisk DOD wipes between my sessions.

    So he opens up my disk's profile in his software, it showed a summary screen with the most sickening line I have ever read:

    "Distinct Disk Profiles Found: 9"

    9? WTF?

    So the demo guy clicked on the 9 and boom this is the actual display that showed:

    Profiles Found (Newest First)
    1 ) Windows XP - FAT32 Parition
    2 ) Attempted DOD Wipe
    3 ) Fedora Linux - Reiser FS, EXT2, SWAP
    4 ) Attempted DOD Wipe
    5 ) FreeBSD - Paritions found 6, JFS,XFS,FAT32,na,na,na
    6 ) Windows 2000 - NTFS
    7 ) Windows 2000 - NTFS
    8 ) Attempted Low Level Format, Sectors Reallocations = 9
    9 ) Attempted Low Level Format, Sectors Reallocations = 0

    WTF? All I could repeat was WTF over and over again. I d

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  131. Kenny Everett would say: by Trull · · Score: 1

    Round 'em up
    Put 'em in a field
    And bomb the bastards!

    --
    -- NSY - SY OOT - Doric signs on local shop doors.
  132. You can't, they can. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Well if you can't access it in any way, then why would it matter?

    Because while you can't access it normally, the kind of people who are able to open HD and remove the platters CAN read those sectors.

    And yes, removing the platters to mount them into another device is pretty much the standard way to recover information from a hard drive.

  133. data definition by heptapod · · Score: 1

    So the government has the capacity recover data from a disk which has suffered from dd where everything's been overwritten with null bytes?

    dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda

  134. Give it to journalspace ?? by krelvin · · Score: 1

    So give it to journalspace ... they don't seem to have problems losing data on hard drives.

  135. YOUR DATA IS WORTH CRAP! GIVE IT TO A NON-PROFIT. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These kinds of threads really irk me. Most of your data is useless personal crap that nobody gives a shit about. Unless you are in some major intel job, or hiding trade secrets, destroying your HD is not only a waste of energy, it's still a working HD that someone else can use! Suggested places to give your old computers and HDs:

    Underfunded local private and public schools
    Local non-profits of personal interest to you
    E-Waste Recyclers

    L2Share not Destroy

  136. ...no match for human stupidity: by quibbler · · Score: 1

    While the theatrics of tank-rolling, smashing, etc. are alluring, the fact is that this is more a symptom of incompetent users. If a competent security geek (they're a scary lot) puts out a physically non-destructive data-erasure procedure, take a guess on the likelihood that users will *actually* follow the procedure any better than the last 30 procedures they were sent that involved a mouse... Its low. Guess who gets the blame when the data is "loosed"? The security geek.

    Instead, said geek issues a 'meatspace' method to make the data totally irrecoverable and the chances of erasure go up astronomically. That, and that alone, is the reason for the ongoing list of these inane and wildly extreme procedures.

    (Most people are stupid, we know this; I imagine the HD's being smashed by the apes with bones at the beginning of 2001.)

    On a technical front, random-data rewrites work. If you don't feel safe with 7, 13, or your favorite random lucky number, use 30. the data WILL be gone. If you're the theatrical type, fire isn't very hot at all: prepare some nice 3.5" pucks of thermite and when you want to destroy a drive, take the condemned outside, put a thermite cookie on top (covering the platter), and light'er up. Problem solved.

  137. Thermite by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

    I work with tons of confidential data. No hard drives, tapes, floppies, CDs/DVDs, memory cards or USB drives leave my care without being "erased" to my satisfaction.

    All magnetic media (hard drive platters, tapes, floppies, etc) are raised above their Curie point. Usually FAR above their Curie point. Usually above their melting point, actually, and occasionally above their flash point.

    Opticals (CDs, DVDs and UDO) are shredded in a paper shredder. If something really important was involved, the chunks are then burned.

    Solid state storage (USB drives and memory cards) generally meets my drill press, particularly if there is a warranty involved. Burning works too, but you need to make sure the NAND die is reduced to ash, not merely the plastic package. For drilling, use a bit at least as big as the minor axis of the chip carrier (if you can identify it) and aim for roughly the center.

    Thermite is cheap and easy to make. The most important thing to remember is not to get the stuff too finely ground. If you use very fine powders, it'll burn too fast and eject a lot of heat up into the air. Use coarser ingredients so that it burns slower and delivers more heat to the target.

    I haven't had the balls to request that the board authorize payment for "secure destruction of confidential data" yet, so I've been paying for the thermite out of pocket, but I don't mind because it is fun. Other people here think it is pretty interesting too, so I usually get a crowd.

    Don't bother with shooting. Just makes a mess.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
  138. The Great Zero Challenge by Hobadee · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who remembers this?
    http://16systems.com/zero/

    Unless you have way too much time on your hands and probably an electron microscope as well, `dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda` works just fine. This is especially true for protecting against identity theft because no identity thief will want to spend that much time/money/effort recoving your data when they can just get another drive that wasn't wiped at all. (Unless you're really rich - then maybe they would.)

    --
    ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
    1. Re:The Great Zero Challenge by _2Karl · · Score: 1

      I remember also. I'm surprised nobody else has deigned to mention it. Somebody mod up the parent.

  139. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or is it? I think I saw one of those pasty interns jump in after it.

  140. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  141. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  142. wow by fantomas · · Score: 1

    wow, don't fancy that. Maybe if I was splitting wood every day I'd be fit enough to swing one but right now it would just damage me - if I get more serious about cutting wood I might think about a small chainsaw. 8lb maul is just about the right weight for me!

  143. The easy way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was dictating (using only the bottom half of my mouth) a journal entry about my recent exploits (OK, virility!) onto my new yet unpacked SATA drive when the agents of some unknown Chinese three lett... uh, pictogram agency breached the perimeter. Short story shorter, I ended up wrapping the drive in two layers of toilet tissue (don't ask!) and pressing it with the top with my thumb until the drive and its packaging had melted into a puddle of glowing goo consisting of only mesons and baryons.

    Three seconds later I started having regrets as I'd ran out of toilet tissue and...

    Yours,

    Chuck Norris

  144. what the ? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Listen, hdd drives are a dime a dozen, i would just buy case and keep my own, and go buy another used one from a shop somehwere, and get rid of it, with its different hdd rather then let mine go if i was that paranoid...but I know how to do a bit to bit wipe on my hdd, maybe some others should learn too?

  145. Smashing Idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BTW: Many gun clubs and firing ranges have "Hard Drive Day's". Not much can be recovered from a drive that experiences the impact of a 45 slug or a 30-06 fired from 50 feet away.

    "Shhh... I'm hunting Wabbits"

  146. Re:My favourite method for 3.5" HDDs - the best im by evanspw · · Score: 1

    and the head magnets make fantastic fridge magnets - they can hold about a year's worth of bills each.

    --
    Interstitial spaces are filled with cream.
  147. But if you physically destroy it.. by NonFerrousBueller · · Score: 1
    ...you can't do cool things like make a Tesla turbine out of the platters.

    I was amazed at the power of the magnets I took out of an old hard drive.

  148. The only question that needs to be asked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it Blend?

  149. Re: What are your experiences? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had two drives stacked very close. When the top drive failed a quick guess was that its circuit board was cooked by the drive underneath. The circuit board swap worked.

  150. Back when by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    I worked for the AG's office our routine method of destroying a drive was to repeatedly hum it at a solid brick wall until all you could hear was rattling pieces inside.

    We opened one up once, what a bloody mess.

  151. is destroying the hard drive really necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is destroying the hard drive really necessary?

    http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/09/06/189248

    http://16systems.com/zero/index.html

  152. use em for target practice. by Robocoastie · · Score: 1

    They make great targets at a firing range :)

  153. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

    Oh, come on. If that comment doesn't beg a reply of "nuke the entire site from orbit", I don't know what does.

  154. personal choices by drpt · · Score: 1

    "Does it blend" works well for Laptop Hard drives, and you can add empty beer cans to suite your taste. Larger drives make unique targets for sighting in the 30-30. If you don't own a gun (convicted felon, wimp, ,,,) you can fashion it as a ground strap on your car and take a road trip

    --
    Proudly Butchering code for 20 years
  155. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Shadow-isoHunt · · Score: 1
    You only need to reach the curie point, anything else is a waste of your time. To do this, I recommend playing with thermite.

    ahh, FIRE!!! heh-heh-heh FIRE FIRE ohhhh!!!!

    --
    www.isoHunt.com
  156. Will it blend? by eKahuna · · Score: 1

    Of course it will! Careful, that's SATA dust. Don't breath it.

  157. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Dan541 · · Score: 1

    How about formatting the disk then using whole disk encryption?

    --
    An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
  158. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Oh really?

    I'm not certain what a drive platter is made of, but steel will lose its magnetism at around 1500 degrees F - slightly more white than a red hot cherry color. The temperature is lower for other magnetic metals. IE, the magnetic field is gone due to the neutral realignment of the steel lattice structure, relieving any stress and putting it in a 'virgin' state. This effect is roughly visible as the metal is heated past the Austenite point - you'll see waves/shadows in the metal as it occurs.

    This is a temperature which can be achieved in a common wood stove or BBQ grill (within the fire's heart, at least) without much effort; it is also only slightly more than half the temperature required to melt steel. If you've got yellow- or white-hot coals in your fire (say, a bond fire or even a larger camp fire made with dry wood) the fire is more than hot enough to demagnetize steel.

    I really, really hope your post was made in jest. And I highly doubt anyone would be able to recover a drive subjected to even marginal "percussive" treatment (ie bent platter) short of using an electron microscope or some such gadgetry.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  159. thermite by juenger1701 · · Score: 1

    smashing still leaves potently usable pieces thermite leaves only molten slag

  160. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    Thank you; I did not know what that temperature was called, but I knew what it was. (Newton commented on the observation of iron losing its magnetic properties at a cherry red, even.)

    It's pretty easy to reach steel's Curie point; you can do it in a hot camp fire's coals.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  161. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by this+great+guy · · Score: 1

    I am surprised no one mentioned by far the simplest and cheapest solution to render any data on a drive inaccessible: if it was encrypted in the first place, just drop or destroy the key. For exmaple, if a password was required to access the data nothing needs to be done as it is already inaccessible to adversaries; or if the key to encrypt a hard drive was stored on a USB thumbdrive, just destroy the thumbdrive.

  162. Alas Lou Ferrigno by tmjva · · Score: 1

    Hulk ... smash!

    --
    Tracy Johnson
    Old fashioned text games hosted below:
    http://empire.openmpe.com/
    BT
  163. Don't smash it, build something stupid out of it! by mcraghead · · Score: 1

    Wind chimes! Coasters! Frisbees! These things: http://www.instructables.com/id/Twitchy_Your_E_waste_Friend/ ...if that isn't safe enough, your data is too important and you should immediately quit your job and sever all ties with society and go live in a tent with a squirrel. Trust me, you'll feel better: Squirrels are great.

  164. This is silly. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    Seriously. Let's review the "confidential information" a typical home user has on their computer:

    social security numbers - yeah, that's a super private thing. I only give it to my employer('s secretary), my doctor('s secretary), my dentist('s secretary), my accountant, my credit card company, the company managing my 401k, and the IRS... You get the idea.

    credit card numbers - not my problem if they are stolen because it is covered by the credit card company... that's why I use them.

    Bank account info - You can also just find my account number by stealing my mail. Have fun guessing my password.

    What else am I missing? My emails are boring and you can have my old pr0n.

    For a home user, there is no need to break out the hammer. Half the people will probably manage to inhale poisonous dust or get a metal frag in their eye. Just delete and overwrite it a few times with free software and toss it. Meanwhile, credit card companies and the IRS will just continue to throw out hard drives and lose flash drives containing thousands of people's private info. Or maybe the secretary who makes $30K will just give all your info to her meth head boyfriend. Or maybe someone will just break into your house and look through your paper files.

  165. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be surprised if they were just shipping them to Hawaii and chucking them into volcanoes.

  166. Wow...that's environmentally friendly. by MikeUW · · Score: 1

    How about instead of wasting perfectly good hardware, boot into a live linux CD, and scrub the disc with...you guessed it: scrub

    Or...just dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/hda

    If anyone actually has the motivation to try recovering your data after that, you're probably already in some kind of trouble.

    1. Re:Wow...that's environmentally friendly. by Qubit · · Score: 1

      Or...just dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/hda

      Of course I can't find the reference now that I need to quote from it, but I remember reading that overwriting your drive with /dev/random is problematic.

      First off, /dev/random on most machines is a pseudo-random number generator. It's slow to generate huge volumes of "random" numbers, and once you try to generate tons and tons of such numbers a second, I believe you'll get what Wikipedia terms "correlation of successive values". If you could get some random number generator coprocessor, that might make it feasible -- and it sounds like some secure-delete systems actually use such a device!

      What I wonder is if anyone has done any research (or simple reasoning) into whether overwriting your drive with random data (pseudo or not) is any more destructive than a simple 0,1,0 series of overwrites.

      --

      coding is life /* the rest is */
  167. just zero the drive. by Harik · · Score: 1

    seriously - has anyone successfully recovered from dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/hda ? I hear about 'slight distortions in the magnetic field due to the previous orientation' but that's basically a bunch of bullshit. Modern drives are as sensitive as they can possibly be so they can cram as much data as possible into their tiny platters. There have been multiple challenges to recover data from that method, and so far none have had any takers.

  168. It's fun by linuxhansl · · Score: 1

    I recently recycled a bunch old computers. I considered wiping the harddrive electronically, but then I didn't feel like the hassle. I just removed the drives and smashed them with hammer. It was fun and the recycling center took them anyway.

  169. cat /dev/urandom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cat /dev/urandom > /dev/sda is your friend.
    That pretty much fubars everything on your platter

  170. Zero-wiping is entirely sufficient by Proteus · · Score: 1

    Reading a modern hard disk that's been written over with zeroes is not that simple, and would likely require very specialized, very precise hardware.

    The historical problem with writing over with zeroes was that the amount of magnetic surface between tracks on the platter was fairly large. This space between tracks would keep a "ghost" of previous data should there be only zeroes written to the nearby tracks. Guttman's research and the DoD wiping method were designed to overwrite the track data and make sure that that "ghost data" would be wiped as well.

    Modern disks have such narrow gaps between tracks that overwriting with zeroes is sufficient to stump any commercial data-recovery attempts. (See, e.g. The Great Zero Challenge).

    The military takes more extreme measures with highly-classified data because there are ridiculously expensive and time-consuming methods that one could use to recover data that's been "merely" wiped. There are governments and organizations that have those resources that might be willing to expend them to get their hands on such data.

    There are not criminal organizations that have or will expend the insane effort to recover the information that might be on an individual's drive. The cost-benefit just isn't there. An individual who boots something like DBAN and does a one-pass wipe of all zeroes across the entire disk is entirely safe from anyone who has less resources than a major government intelligence agency.

    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  171. Overwrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't there recently a study or the like that showed that there was no necessity for the physical destruction of a hard drive, provided that the disk was overwritten with zeroes? Obviously, there still may be faint traces of data, but the probability of those being recovered is so remote after adequate passes that wasting a drive is not a worthwhile endeavor.

    This is to my understanding, of course.

  172. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by pnet · · Score: 1

    the simple steps... [0] you have already encrypted your data of course [1] you run your secure erase util overwriting data at least 7 times. [2] you remove the spindle-cover. [3] you drill several holes of varying diameters through all the platters { avoid letting the drill slip and unnecessarily scratching the nickel plating } [4] visit a local retailer and ask him to run the magnetic security-tag release wand over the platters for at least 90 seconds. { the her's often object } you now have a pretty nice paperweight for your desk...right where you can keep your eye on it eh! remember to lock it in a drawer overnight though.

  173. Re:"The only fireproof way of safeguarding your da by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

    but you cant be sure that it worked, whereas when the metal has melted its pretty obvious that it worked.

    --
    IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  174. Much cheaper alternative... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An adversary can't pull the data off the hard drives if they can't physically get to them.

    Just put the hard drives some place that no one can or would want to go -- have the DoD hire Paris Hilton as an SSR ("secure suppository repository")

  175. Spin it up, THEN Shoot It by dsmall · · Score: 1

    I've had very good luck with a couple 6 volt "lantern" batteries, a standard 4-pin disk drive power connector, and a few alligator clips. Connect the 6 V batteries + to -. On the "+" battery, connect its minus to the center two black "ground" leads. Connect the "+" of the "+" battery to the +5 line (red) going to the drive. Finally, connect the "+" of the other battery to the +12V (yellow) wire. So we're supplying ground, +6, and +12. Heck, it has a voltage regulator on +5 ... and it doesn't have long to live anyway.

    Plug the drive in. Spin it up. IMPORTANT: Put it so the platters are at 90 degrees to you! In other words, put it so that if the platters explode, they won't hit you. You don't want it sitting on the ground with the platters parallel to the ground; you want them spinning at 90 degrees to the ground and to you.

    Hike back a bit and shoot with a heavy slug. A slug from a 12 gauge works fine. All the rotational (angular) momentum is transferred to the frame as the platters stop almost instantly. The drive goes whirl-whirl-whirl, sometimes up in the air!

        I found that the .223 round from an M16A1 was strangely ineffective, but going to full auto made me feel better, and that's the point of all this. [ Yes it's legal to own an M16A1 here if you hop through the paperwork hoops]. Alas, the M16 was a toy I got rid of later ...

    9 mm works very well at disassembling the drives, as does .45 cal.

      By the way, there are **absolutely terrific** magnets inside modern drives. Open 'em up and use a little acetone to unglue the magnets. They're the "supermagnets". And if you disassemble the drive with shooting, it is commonly opened FOR you!

              Shooting a disk drive that crashed and lost you a bunch of work is terrific stuff. In Las Vegas there are a couple places that let you bring in your computer or whatever and shoot it with automatic weapons. Hmmmm, maybe I should try an AK-47 someday, that's a .30 cal round...

          *grin*

    David Small

  176. Military Destruction by Viperpete · · Score: 1

    In the US Navy we wiped the drives per spec (DoD 5220.22-M current) with any off the shelf that fulfilled it.

    We'd mark them as destroy and do several things that was acceptable for destruction.

    Some examples are: Drill a bunch of holes in them; smash the crap out of them w/ hammer, sledge hammer, axe, pneumatic hammer, blow torch.

    Of course, we'd then throw them overboard.

    --
    loose: not fitting closely or tightly != lose: to suffer the deprivation of
  177. Sensitivity of Data by GregNorc · · Score: 1

    I think we should take into account the sensitivity of the date. A couple passes with boot and nuke is probably sufficient if I'm wiping my HD before I sell/trash it. Anything more paranoid really isn't necessary unless you believe a major government agency would be after your data. I'm talking NSA level. I spoke once with a cybercrimes enforcer for the state police, and he basically admitted unless a dictionary attack worked or they were using shitty encryption (48 bit) they really couldn't do anything. If neither of these worked, unless the suspect was dumb enough to leave the password written down next to the computer, they weren't able to do anything with the data.