Slashdot Mirror


Colbert Wins Space Station Name Contest

As we speculated a couple of weeks back, it has come to pass. Reader mknewman writes to tell us that comedian Stephen Colbert has won the vote to have his name immortalized (or at least until it crashes) as the moniker on NASA's newest addition to the International Space Station. We can but wonder what NASA will do now. "NASA's mistake was allowing write-ins. Colbert urged viewers of his Comedy Central show, 'The Colbert Report' to write in his name. And they complied, with 230,539 votes. That clobbered Serenity, one of the NASA choices, by more than 40,000 votes. Nearly 1.2 million votes were cast by the time the contest ended Friday."

471 comments

  1. Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Nakor+BlueRider · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's not mentioned in the article, but what brought this all up in the first place was the fact that "Xenu" was winning the write-in vote before he asked viewers on his show to write in his own name instead. Xenu is the galactic overlord from Scientology myth. Colbert asked his viewers to write in his own name, and the following day he had already passed Xenu on the write-ins. The show that evening, he declared himself the new galactic overlord.

    Incidentally, NASA reserved the write to call it whatever they want; they don't have to go with the vote.

    1. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by unlametheweak · · Score: 5, Funny

      Xenu is the galactic overlord from Scientology myth

      Xenu is NOT a myth! I take it you are not a Scientologist.

    2. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by FrostedWheat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Xenu is NOT a myth

      Your right, it's SyFy!

    3. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by schon · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's too bad..

      My information may be out of date, but at one time Scientologists were told they needed to have scientology-approved censorware on their computers, and one of the things that the banned words was "xenu" (apparently to protect the scientologists from encountering a website that would kill them.)

      It would have been hilarious if ever website that contained a reference to the space station would have been blocked.

    4. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Seriousity · · Score: 1

      I'd watch what you say if I were you mate! Xeby might throw you in a volcano, leaving your soul to hover up into a GIANT SOUL-CATCHER!!! Then he'll inject your soul into a life-form which will result in the negative emotions of subsequent generations of said life-form! It's happened before, it's historical fact!

      Disclaimer: The only true factual historic record is found inside the library of the Church of Scientology

      --
      This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
    5. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell a new internet meme brewing.

      I for one...

    6. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by samkass · · Score: 5, Informative

      Incidentally, NASA reserved the write to call it whatever they want; they don't have to go with the vote.

      I suspect it's as likely to be named "Colbert" as Hank, the Angry, Drunken Dwarf is to become People's Most Beautiful Person.

      --
      E pluribus unum
    7. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by bonch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Naming it Xenu would have hurt Scientology, not helped it. Xenu is considered top secret by the Church of Scientology and its lawyers, and they sue people who post the texts--they forced Slashdot to remove a comment for the first time in its history. People wondering what Xenu is would look it up and find out about OT III. It would have been a great blow to have that out there. Thanks to Colbert and his mindless viewers who do everything he says, that won't happen, and the opportunity is gone.

      Consider me biased since I'm sick of Colbert's schtick, and I'm sick of his college kiddie fans who parrot everything he says and spam his videos to Digg.

    8. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This idea was invented by Shampoo.

    9. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Penguinshit · · Score: 1

      The Scilons worship a Kiwi warrior princess?

    10. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Spaseboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think it's important to remember all of the popular, positive attention Stephen Colbert has given to NASA over the years and science in general. He well deserves the name if for nothing else than for the great PR he brings NASA.

      Did you even know there was an addition to the space station before it was on The Colbert Report? I didn't.

      --
      "I don't want more choice, I just want nicer things!"
      -Jennifer Saunders as Edina Monsoon
    11. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Cynonamous+Anoward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Welcome my new sarcastic, wise-cracking overlord?

      --
      "The GPL is viral by design, like any good religion."
    12. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by palegray.net · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not to diminish Colbert's fame or anything, but just about anything trumps Scientology. I've got a broken toaster that I'd rather consult for spiritual advice.

    13. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only if you remove the attached Thetans first, though, right?

    14. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does anyone else secretly suspect Hank actually has the better odds?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    15. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by jd · · Score: 1

      It's the Haka. They want to get rights to perform it in their ceremonies.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    16. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Section_Ei8ht · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but doesn't that broken toaster count as an e-meter?

    17. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by m.ducharme · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course, you can't run Linux on a toaster until you remove the Thetans.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    18. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Now that is a silly idea, you should know the corporate Scientologists would have wrapped up the name in all sorts of spin to make themselves look good. It really comes off as one seriously deranged organisation. The end of L Ron Hubbard and the family he took with him into Scientology should be a real warning as to what those corporate types who took over Scientology are really like. Basically at the end there, it looks like the rewrote Hubbard's will, killed him the next day, launched into a Machiavellian purge where they drove out all the high level true believers and then for good measure psychologically enslaved Hubbard's last lot of children to the money making scheme. Really fucked up stuff.

      Personally I would name it after the poor bugger who stayed up command module (went all that way, never got to take that last step but launched others on the final journey) when man for set his foot on the moon, now what was his name again?

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    19. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Damn you Colbert! Daaaammmmmnnnnn Yooouuuu!

      Good grief.
      1. Get a sense of humor
      2. Don't watch the show if you don't like it
      3. Spend less time on Digg (more diverse viewing - it's the internet after all, there's gotta be something else to see)
      4. Don't worry so much about ridiculous religions that total less than 100k followers... they're not going to rule the world.
    20. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Socguy · · Score: 1

      Ya, I voted strategically for Colbert. I wouldn't have bothered if he was competing against 'Serenity', however, there is no way in hell I want Xenu on the ISS.

    21. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Naming it Xenu would have hurt Scientology, not helped it. Xenu is considered top secret by the Church of Scientology and its lawyers...

      So you are implying that it was the Scientologists who voted for Colbert and gamed the system against Xenu?

    22. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Nimey · · Score: 5, Funny

      $DEITY help us all.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    23. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, in these times of budget cuts I can't imagine NASA doing something so stupid as not naming it Colbert. I mean that's a guaranteed segment once a month for a long time because he'll keep talking about it like he did Stephen Colbeagle the Eagle or whatever that thing was. NASA has lost a lot in the way of hearts and minds since we were first heading to the moon. They need the 'Colbert Bump.'

    24. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      I've got a broken toaster that I'd rather consult for spiritual advice.

      I don't know, toasters can be pretty annoying. But you're probably right.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    25. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't see why they wouldn't name it "Colbert". I mean, yeah, it's a joke, but it's also good publicity, and what harm does it do?

      I think if they don't, it's showing that the people running NASA are sticks in the mud and take themselves too seriously.

    26. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $DEITY help us all.

      That is like trying to cat /dev/null.

    27. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry so much about ridiculous religions that total less than 100k followers... they're not going to rule the world.

      They made Slashdot remove a comment, this is not a ridiculous religion, it's a frightening scam-monster covered by the protection of a so called religion that targets entertainment people onto their scam. Not because E! people it's more stupid to join that or just for the $, but because E! people can effectively tell the Jane public to join them and Jane will trust them.

    28. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by MaggieL · · Score: 0, Troll

      Did you even know there was an addition to the space station before it was on The Colbert Report? I didn't.

      Did that stop you from trying to turn the name of it into a joke?

      --
      -=Maggie Leber=-
    29. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Dark$ide · · Score: 1, Funny

      You may not be able to run Linux. But SUPER MARIO KARTS is running on this SNES toaster

      --

      Sigs. We don't need no steenking sigs.

    30. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by againjj · · Score: 1

      Xenu was beaten out by Colbert, MyYearBook, and Gaia, so it wasn't even second.
      http://www.nasa.gov/externalflash/name_ISS/index.html

    31. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xenu is the galactic overlord from Scientology myth

      Xenu is NOT a myth! I take it you are not a Scientologist.

      That's nothing... the lord of elves in Scientology is named Elron.

    32. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really should be thanking the Jewish writers on the show, although Stephen Colbert is a good prompter reader.

    33. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't see why they wouldn't name it "Colbert". I mean, yeah, it's a joke, but it's also good publicity, and what harm does it do?

      I think if they don't, it's showing that the people running NASA are sticks in the mud and take themselves too seriously.

      As someone else pointed out in a previous thread on this subject, serious organizations, especially ones with government connections, don't like to name things after people who are still alive.

      You see, if you name it after a person who has lived out their life, you can evaluate their entire life and make sure that they haven't done anything that you wouldn't want to be associated with. However, someone who is still alive might very well do something in the future (kill someone in a drunk driving accident, get caught with child pornography, shoot their wife, etc) that no one wants to be associated with.

    34. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, I remember this. It was part of their plan to fill the search engines with positive Scientology references: to install the Scientology authorized, copyrighted and trademarked materials, you had to use their software, which installed a version of Net Nanny. It also had my name in it: misspelled.

    35. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by merreborn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins.
      It's not mentioned in the article, but what brought this all up in the first place was the fact that "Xenu" was winning the write-in vote before he asked viewers on his show to write in his own name instead. Xenu is the galactic overlord from Scientology myth.

      You make it sound as if this is a victory over scientology.

      On the contrary, as I understand it, Xenu is more akin to Scientology's satan, than their god -- not a name they'd be trying to promote themselves. The effort to vote for Xenu was almost certainly an action of anti-Scientology protesters -- "Anonymous" being a likely culprit, what with their recent activity and affinity for online stunts like this. (of course, any depiction of "Anonymous" as a cohesive group with any sort of organization or leadership is misleading -- Anonymous is more of a flash mob)

      The WP article on Xenu seems to support this theory:

      Critics of the Church of Scientology have used public protests to spread the Xenu secret. This has included creating web sites with "xenu" in the domain name, and displaying the name Xenu on banners, and protest signs.

    36. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by elronxenu · · Score: 2, Informative
      That plan worked as well as most things Scientology does ... it backfired on them most splendidly...

      ... leaving people wondering why David Miscavige was sensitive to the phrase "squeal like a pig".

      10 years have passed, and Scientology is still an evil, ruthless, desperate, ineffective, incompetent. laughing stock of a cult.

    37. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by FleaPlus · · Score: 5, Informative

      As someone else pointed out in a previous thread on this subject, serious organizations, especially ones with government connections, don't like to name things after people who are still alive.

      You see, if you name it after a person who has lived out their life, you can evaluate their entire life and make sure that they haven't done anything that you wouldn't want to be associated with. However, someone who is still alive might very well do something in the future (kill someone in a drunk driving accident, get caught with child pornography, shoot their wife, etc) that no one wants to be associated with.

      Of course, not everybody follows that advice:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Stevens_Anchorage_International_Airport

    38. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia shampoo invents YOU!

    39. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, who would want the men and women who design, build, launch and manage a gajillion [tax]dollar space faring craft to take it seriously?

      Duuur... it's the "Colbert"! ROFLMAOWTFBBQ!1?! Think we can get the comms on it to play an endless loop of Rick Aston cause that would be super-awesome-k-rad-d00derz!!

      Come to think of it, I saw this movie. I think after we're done celebrating our more brilliant achievements we start mocking them... then we try to water the crops with energy drinks and starve ourselves. Uhg.

    40. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All the people who did what Colbert told them should know that whether your part of an ironic cult or a normal cult, it's still a cult.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    41. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      That had absolutely nothing to do with anything being discussed.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    42. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Thetans go best on toasted rye.

      I say, let the crazies have their toast and their linux too.

    43. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      I think it's important to remember all of the popular, positive attention Stephen Colbert has given to NASA over the years and science in general. He well deserves the name if for nothing else than for the great PR he brings NASA.

      Did you even know there was an addition to the space station before it was on The Colbert Report? I didn't.

      Yeah, actually. I heard about it two weeks before Colbert mentioned it on his show from Firefly fans.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    44. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      You can't run Linux, but you can run NetBSD:

      http://www.embeddedarm.com/software/arm-netbsd-toaster.php

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    45. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 1

      Well one thing is for certain... Howard Stern has lost his fan base because back in the day this would have been the Angry Drunken Dwarf Module.

      Too bad Howard Stern is no longer king of Radio.

      I think Jay Leno said it best when he acknowledged Opie and Anthony as "The most popular show in the history of satellite radio"

      FRRRRRRRRRRRRRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUNNNNNNNNNNNNNKIS!

      "Is that a train?"

    46. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by obarthelemy · · Score: 2, Funny

      aren't they making oodles of money, which is what counts ... to them ?

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    47. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      1- Naming it Colbert is ridiculous and fun. We need more of that !
      2- Please, link to the web site that instantly and completely unveils every dead person's complete life, actions and thoughts. It's not as if we regularly had nasty surprises...

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    48. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by renimar · · Score: 5, Funny

      The airport to nowhere!

      --
      In other news, Microsoft Windows users are now covered under the Americans with Disabilties Act...
    49. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by whoop · · Score: 1

      Let's be honest people, once it is named, it will be forgotten within 100 hours. How many Americans can recall the names of each individual section of the space station (without Wikipedia, Google, etc)? How many Americans know there is a space station up there? This is not going to be like naming the Apollo lunar lander touching down on the Moon or anything. Come to think of it, we could device some plan to use this module as a rescue pod so we can hear them astronauts say, "Houston, the Colbert has landed."

      Anyway, let's have some fun with it! Space can be fun, too, ya know.

    50. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by elronxenu · · Score: 1

      No, they stopped building work on their "Super Power" building in 2003 and haven't resumed since.

    51. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not all publicity is good publicity. NASA would turn themselves from a place where serious science is done to a joke. Please save us from that fate.

    52. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. The proper spelling is "Syfylon".

    53. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

      So you are saying Colbert is a secret Scientologist?

    54. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by justgosh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here is the domain and word list for the censorware. http://www.xenu.net/archive/events/censorship/wordlist.html

    55. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by feitingen · · Score: 4, Funny

      shoot their wife, etc) that no one wants to be associated with.

      The guy who named reiserfs should have thought of that

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank.
    56. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by escudier0 · · Score: 1

      Name it after this Colbert then.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Baptiste_Colbert

    57. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      Well then I guess "Serenity" is right out. Who knows what awful sequel or remake will come out down the road.

    58. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by lfourrier · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to wikipedia :
      Colbert is a common surname and rare given name of Old French and Old German origins; it was introduced to Britain by the Normans.[1]

      Colbert most commonly refers to:
      Jean-Baptiste Colbert (1619–1683), French minister of finance under King Louis XIV...

      And that's the US version.

    59. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Killjoy_NL · · Score: 1

      He did quite well during the writers strike :P

      --
      This is the sig that says NI (again)
    60. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by BlueTemplar · · Score: 0

      Yes, it looks like 4chan was behind Xenu. And we have to thank them, otherwise this hilarious video wouldn't have happened: http://www.colbertnation.com/the-colbert-report-videos/220648/march-04-2009/space-module--colbert---scientology-s-new-galactic-overlord

    61. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah. A member of the First Church of Appliantology. The white zone is for loading and unloading only.

    62. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      Personally, I ask the Hypnotoad for guidance in my life.

    63. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      If you absolutely must have a smart toaster and don't have the time to get it audited and clear you can bite the bullet and install embedded Windows. Then the Thetans will be inconvenienced by the constant blue screens.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    64. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      Is that before or after you lick its skin?

    65. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by someone1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      All scams and/or religions started with but a few people believing them.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    66. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 2, Funny

      Scientology == Sham Poo

      Please don't sue me...

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    67. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by frenchbedroom · · Score: 1
      Well, if they just name it "Colbert" and not "Stephen Colbert", I'm not going to associate it with an American comedian I've never heard about until today.

      Jean-Baptiste Colbert

    68. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Of course, not everybody follows that advice:

      Yeah, but Ted probably helped get them to name it after himself. He *is* the Republican King of Pork Spending, after all...

    69. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so's yer mother.

    70. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But isnt Xenu something like the devil in $cientology? And thetans are the demons? Not that Confused...

    71. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The First Church of Applientology!

    72. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      tang

    73. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by rodney+dill · · Score: 1

      Sorry... you lose...

      Scientology is the real poo... and lots of it...

      --

      Use your head, can't you, use your head,
      You're on earth, there's no cure for that
      - S. Beckett
    74. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they don't want their new module to be named after a douche bag.

    75. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone else pointed out in a previous thread on this subject, serious organizations, especially ones with government connections, don't like to name things after people who are still alive.

      You see, if you name it after a person who has lived out their life, you can evaluate their entire life and make sure that they haven't done anything that you wouldn't want to be associated with. However, someone who is still alive might very well do something in the future (kill someone in a drunk driving accident, get caught with child pornography, shoot their wife, etc) that no one wants to be associated with.

      Colbert died several centuries ago. So your objection doesn't apply.

    76. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Of course, you can't run Linux on a toaster until you remove the Thetans.

      Install Linux On Your Toaster
      www.umlug.umd.edu/meetings/notes/linux_on_devices_10_14_04.ps

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    77. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Funny

      What about people who believe in @DEITIES, you insensitive clod?!

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    78. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by OolimPhon · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

    79. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      All the people who did what Colbert told them should know that whether your part of an ironic cult or a normal cult, it's still a cult.

      If that's true, then "cult" isn't the vile epithet you seem to be hoping to apply to whoever you hate today.

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    80. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serenity was much better. I guess it's now still open to put on something cooler though.

      I vote we name the replacement for the space shuttle Firefly.

    81. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right ... Scientology == Sham Wow!

    82. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Science dammit!

    83. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gaius, is that you?

    84. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody cast 'Summon Kibo'!

    85. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by rumith · · Score: 1

      Of course, this aircraft carrier has nothing to do with this person, who is still alive. Or perhaps Navy isn't a serious governmental organization? My point is that you're plain wrong, no offense meant.

    86. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but you can run NetBSD on it!

    87. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Ok, I admit I'm torn between "fucking weirdo" and "wicked hardhack."

    88. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      13 y/o troll is up past his bedtime...

    89. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be under the impression that NASA is not already a joke.

    90. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just a butt-hurt Republican who feels the pinch every time Colbert hits a little too close to home (which I suspect is quite often) with his little parody of your (rich with comedic value) mindset.

      No one is going to think NASA is a joke, and you know that, you just want to complain about being accurately parodied and protect people from seeing you as you really are.

      Now go back to freerepublic, or go suck off an oil baron, or whatever it is you troglodytes do in those rare moments that you're not acting like you got the unfair end of the stick for being white and rich.

    91. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now what was his name again?

      Michael Collins

    92. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by PriceIke · · Score: 1

      I don't watch Colbert. I only knew about the addition to the space station from Slashdot. And I seriously hope NASA's grown-ups give the module a worthy name, not that of a trendy cable-TV cult personality. NASA's naming conventions are generally far nobler than that.

      If the FARK commandos had won the contest with "Rick Astley", would you expect NASA to honor the choice? I sincerely hope not.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    93. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by malkien · · Score: 1

      I don't mean to bash the parent or anything, but how can a post beginning with "I suspect" be Score:5, Informative ?

    94. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by yoyhed · · Score: 1

      You know the Germans make good stuff.

      --
      WHO NEEDS SHIFT WHEN YOU HAVE CAPSLOCK/ DAMN1
    95. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by tekrat · · Score: 1

      Thank you, thank you. *Someone* remembers their internet history.

      As one of the people who voted for Hank after listening to Howard Stern that morning, I can tell you I'm still pissed off at People Magazine for that. I mean, if they aren't going to uphold the results of the contest, why have the contest at all?

      Of course, it should be pointed out, that, at the time, probably less than 1% of People Magazine's readership used the internet, while 60% of Howard Stern listeners were online regulars.

      These days the percentage of people who are interested in NASA or watch Colbert, and are online users, is probably roughly the same...

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    96. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by frog_strat · · Score: 1

      You can read about this and more in the awesome book "The Complex" by John Duignan. You may have to order it from Ireland, but it is a great book that describes one man's brave attempt to escape scientology after making it up the ranks.

    97. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by sanguisdex · · Score: 1

      I believe you mean $DEITY = array()

    98. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by bluej100 · · Score: 1

      Perl has typed sigils.

    99. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      I believe that's "The airport from nowhere."

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    100. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Ronald_Reagan_(CVN-76)

      *shudder*

    101. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I'm sick of Colbert's schtick, and I'm sick of his college kiddie fans who parrot everything he says and spam his videos to Digg.

      This means that his schtick works as it's meant as a parody of right-wing pundits like Rush Limbaugh and Bill O'Reilly and their followers (ditto-heads, etc).

      I take your point, though, and don't condone blindly following *anyone* or their beliefs... (if that was your point)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    102. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Collectively americans act like such assholes it's easy to have a negative opinion of them.

    103. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was also really disappointed when I saw Colbert direct his viewers to submit his name, as I was really looking forward to Xenu winning.

      However, there is not a chance in hell that NASA would have called it Xenu. The scientologists would have immediately filed lawsuits, and NASA management would have had to choose between a potentially long legal battle or not using the name. There's no way they'd have decided to go to court over it.

    104. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps some the people who voted for Colbert were refering to Conn Colbert of the Easter Rising in Dublin in 1916?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Con_Colbert

    105. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sick of his college kiddie fans who parrot everything he says and spam his videos to Digg.

      If you are sick of "college kiddie fans" Digg is probably not the site you want to be reading on a regular basis.

    106. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by hicksw · · Score: 1

      Then name it for his grandfather Colbert.

      Unless he is still with us.

      Or was caught doing something ungoodthinkful.

    107. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod Parent Underrated. This is +5 offtopic material.

    108. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Well, at least you know you'll be getting airplanes, instead of a big truck.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    109. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only things NASA requires from Colbert fans are distance and silence.

    110. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by volpe · · Score: 1

      NASA has a history of bowing to public pressure when it comes to naming things.

    111. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by dickon_england · · Score: 1

      HERE HERE!

    112. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by LiquidAvatar · · Score: 1

      What if they do name it Colbert, and then next year Colbert is found guilty of serial killings and child molestation? There's a good reason not to name such achievements after living people...

      --
      It is difficult to free fools from the chains they revere.
      -Voltaire
    113. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by nine-times · · Score: 1

      What if they name it Colbert 100 years after his death, and then evidence surfaces claiming that he was a serial killer? Or what if some other person becomes a serial killer, and also happens to be named "Colbert"?

      Or what if Obama snaps and becomes a serial killer in 10 years? Then we'll have to live with the shame of having at one point elected him president.

      Hell, sometimes you just have to do things in spite of the danger that something bad might happen later.

    114. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      ERROR: variable not found

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    115. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Myth = any religion you don't believe in.

      Thor is a myth to Christians but not to the Norse.
      Christ as a deity is a myth to Hindu but not to Christians.

      Myth used correctly should not be a negative term.

    116. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by jafac · · Score: 1

      Never mind the new Aircraft Carrier, "George H W Bush". (known for fathering a smaller ship, a destroyer, which tended to list and steer to the right, often steaming in circles, and occasionally randomly firing torpedoes at other vessels, whether they posed a real threat or not. Eventually its maneuvers drove an entire fleet of ships aground. . . )

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    117. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Myth used correctly should not be a negative term.

      Yes. True. And I think (for a happy change) that the Moderators got it more right this time with my post. My literal comment is bogus, but the Moderation is correct.

    118. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by darkvizier · · Score: 1

      Come on, Hank has a beautiful soul, just begging to be released...

    119. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      "Vile epithet" :-) Someone has been reading the thesaurus.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    120. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naming it Xenu would have hurt Scientology, not helped it. Xenu is considered top secret by the Church of Scientology and its lawyers, and they sue people who post the texts--they forced Slashdot to remove a comment for the first time in its history. People wondering what Xenu is would look it up and find out about OT III. It would have been a great blow to have that out there. Thanks to Colbert and his mindless viewers who do everything he says, that won't happen, and the opportunity is gone.

      Consider me biased since I'm sick of Colbert's schtick, and I'm sick of his college kiddie fans who parrot everything he says and spam his videos to Digg.

      Everyone else is a kiddie because they don't go along with your plan? Seems sort of like you're the child.

    121. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      Nah, someone just reads too much ;-)

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    122. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; everyone wins. by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      So you're saying Windows Vista's codename was really "Thetan"?

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  2. RIP by 222 · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    RIP Battletoad :(

    1. Re:RIP by MrEricSir · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And they say Colbert is a /b/tard...

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:RIP by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1, Redundant

      RIP Battletoad :(

      What's this about?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:RIP by clem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I say we get an early start and begin naming our spacecraft and space stations in the fashion of Iain M. Bank's Culture. Gravitas? We don't need no stinking gravitas.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    4. Re:RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I voted for Battletoad too.. that would have been... awesome. :)

      Would have ruined a bunch of trolling fun.

    5. Re:RIP by T+Murphy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Parent is not offtopic (I'd mod it funny if I had points)- Battletoad was brought up in the other thread about the ISS/Colbert news. Mourning the loss of other favorite names is certainly on topic.

    6. Re:RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1, Hell yeah.

      My first pick would be either Serious Callers Only, Well I Was In The Neighbourhood or Subtle Shift In Emphasis. Next time there is a vote we should really go for a Banks name.

  3. I'm shocked... by end15 · · Score: 5, Funny

    that my write in vote for Bigus Dickus didn't win... I thought I had the mobs support. Cheers, endxv

    --
    All glory to the Hypnotoad!
    1. Re:I'm shocked... by Quothz · · Score: 4, Funny

      that my write in vote for Bigus Dickus didn't win...

      What's so funny about Biggus Dickus? I have a vewy gweat fwiend named Biggus Dickus.

    2. Re:I'm shocked... by a+whoabot · · Score: 1

      ...vewy gweat fwiend in Wome...

      Sorry, OCD acting up.

    3. Re:I'm shocked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And do you know her wife's name?

    4. Re:I'm shocked... by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Let me come with you Pontiuth! I may be of thome athithtanth thould a thudden crithith arithe!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    5. Re:I'm shocked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incontinencia buttocks

    6. Re:I'm shocked... by Tenek · · Score: 1

      Wait 'till Biggus Dickus heaws of this!

    7. Re:I'm shocked... by sc0ob5 · · Score: 1

      LOL! Best movie ever! Thanks guys for making my day.

    8. Re:I'm shocked... by Nimey · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's one of the highest wanking men in all of Wome.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    9. Re:I'm shocked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That-th Bigguth Dickuth you inthenthetive clod.

    10. Re:I'm shocked... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      Well, I guess that's better than his wife "Incontinentia Buttocks".

      The whole bit is here:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2K8_jgiNqUc&NR=1

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    11. Re:I'm shocked... by pohl · · Score: 1

      LOL!

      Silence! I've had enough of this wowdy webel sniggewing behaviour!

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    12. Re:I'm shocked... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      It'th no funnier than the theven theditious thcribeth from Theasarea.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    13. Re:I'm shocked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has a wife, you know.

    14. Re:I'm shocked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has a wife, you know. Incontinentia, Incontinentia Buttix.

  4. NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 0, Troll

    "NASA's mistake was allowing write-ins.

    No! It was NASA's genius to get a name-brand late-night comedy show host as a major unpaid endorsement to a multi-billion dollar government money pit, I mean research program.

    1. Re:NASA won by Loadmaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah! What the fuck have we ever gotten from NASA? Pretty pictures?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Spinoff
      http://spaceplace.nasa.gov/en/kids/spinoffs2.shtml

    2. Re:NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Yeah! What the fuck have we ever gotten from NASA? Pretty pictures?

      Largely. I did enjoy the National Geographic spreads when I was a kid. Your question would have been more relevent if it dealt directly with the space station. I would be interested to know how much scientific knowledge per dollar we are getting out of this program. I do know the Russians are certainly profiting from the tourism aspect of the space station.

    3. Re:NASA won by Tenant129 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Compare your Wikipedia article with mine, and you'll see they are not equal. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_budget

    4. Re:NASA won by Rigrig · · Score: 5, Interesting

      All right, but apart from the Pretty Pictures, Light-Emitting Diodes, Infrared Ear Thermometers, DeBakey's Ventricular Assist Device, Artificial Limbs, Aircraft Anti-Icing Systems, Highway Safety Grooving, Improved Radial Tires, Chemical Detection, Video Enhancing and Analysis Systems, Land Mine Removal, Fire-Resistant Reinforcement, Firefighting Equipment, Temper Foam, Enriched Baby Food, Portable Cordless Vacuums, Freeze Drying Technology, Water Purification, Solar Energy, Pollution Remediation, Better Virtual Software, Structural Analysis, Internet-Connected Ovens, Powdered Lubricants, Improved Mine Safety and Food Safety Systems, what have we ever gotten from NASA?

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    5. Re:NASA won by Loadmaster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good, while their messing with tourists we can do real research. Here's the list of experiments done on each expedition.

      http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/science/experiments/Expedition.html

      And no, just because these don't mean anything to you does not mean they mean nothing to anyone else.

    6. Re:NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      You sound like an apologist. It's sad because I never did say anything negative about NASA. There is generally no need to defend if nothing is wrong. OK, I did mention the word "money pit", yes, but I did not say I was against money pits.

      Answer this question for me: How much more science could be done here on Earth (or in space) if NASA didn't have to spend billions of dollars every year sending people into space?

      You also never answered my previous question as to how much science per dollar NASA and its tax payers are getting for their effort.

    7. Re:NASA won by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Brought peace.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    8. Re:NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Unfortunately for NASA, this is the reason most people would want to get rid of NASA, because it would be many thousands of times more cost efficient to develop those things directly for utilitarian Earth bound industries rather than having indirect spin-offs through NASA. What a waste :(

    9. Re:NASA won by little_hate_machine · · Score: 1

      Rather have my tax money pay for stuff that I can enjoy then say http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USAID

    10. Re:NASA won by maxume · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Go away, troll.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:NASA won by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      how much science per dollar NASA and its tax payers are getting for their effort.

      Which units do you want that in? Parsnips per flimflam?

    12. Re:NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Go away, troll.

      Unfortunately it is people like you, and the Moderator who labeled me Flamebait who are Trolls. Being a Fanboy, whether it be a Mac Fanboy, a Religious Fanboy, a NASA Fanboy, or any type of Fanboy for that matter, will never help an argument. Just because you and your people label me Troll does not mean you win an argument.

      What I say is honest and based on logic. I'm not going nowhere. Just because you don't like what I say does not change reality.

      I tried to help people here to prove their points by giving them reasonable questions to answer, but instead of answering the questions people like you just re-frame the argument and try to make me look like a Troll. It's very hypocritical, but it certainly is a successful propaganda technique.

    13. Re:NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 0, Troll

      Just had a look, and I've noticed that you NASA Fan-boys are Troll-labeling other posters who are not distinctly pro-NASA as well. It's too bad.

    14. Re:NASA won by maxume · · Score: 1

      Asserting that everything NASA accomplished would have been cheaper if done outside of a space program isn't based on logic, it is based on assertion (it isn't something that can be reasonably proved or disproved, history is). Repeatedly making un or weakly supported assertions is a great way to troll, you can just keep pretending they are facts.

      You are a self loving fanboy.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Re-framing again, congratulations. You and your Fanboys have unclaimed assertions and you say I am a Troll for asking you to be accountable. No that is a dishonest argument on your part.

    16. Re:NASA won by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are repeatedly modded as a troll in your comment history. This isn't some conspiracy and is not entirely explainable by the lackluster quality of moderation, so it indicates that you are either actively trolling, or that you are unable to consistently communicate in a way that other people find useful.

      Also, note that the only thing that I have asserted is that you are a troll (and I am willing to admit that you may simply be unaware of how ineffective your style of communication is; maybe style shouldn't matter, but that's life.).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    17. Re:NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Well, I've been told before in the real world that I'm not the sharpest knife in the kitchen.

    18. Re:NASA won by Dr_Banzai · · Score: 1

      I doubt the russians are "profiting" from space tourism. More like offsetting a small fraction of the budget.

    19. Re:NASA won by iminplaya · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sometimes the direct route is not always the best route. The river meanders for a reason.

      --
      What?
    20. Re:NASA won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Tang.

    21. Re:NASA won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brought peace.

      Fucking peace...

    22. Re:NASA won by Meumeu · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for NASA, this is the reason most people would want to get rid of NASA, because it would be many thousands of times more cost efficient to develop those things directly for utilitarian Earth bound industries rather than having indirect spin-offs through NASA. What a waste :(

      In that case, why didn't anyone develop any of this stuff before NASA ?

    23. Re:NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Yours is a thoughtful response. Everybody else seems to knee-jerk a response into the ribs.

    24. Re:NASA won by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what the hell have the Romans ever done for us?

    25. Re:NASA won by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      Which is worse, the fanboi or the antiboi?

      It does not matter either way. It would have taken much longer, or perhaps never, for such items to ever make it to the free market because the free market does not like to spend money on short-term money pits like the technology which has been brought to us by the "space age."

      We have plenty of Terran technology which is "good enough" and does not cost extra money, just maybe a life here and there. But "good enough" for Earth is not good enough for space. The space program sank money into an expensive necessity and then found ways to produce it inexpensively. Then some smart person or group of people figured out how to use it to make Earth-bound life better, and how to manufacture it even more inexpensively.

      We still have a lot to learn from our space travels. I personally cannot wait to get off this fekking planet.

    26. Re:NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      It would have taken much longer, or perhaps never, for such items to ever make it to the free market because the free market does not like to spend money on short-term money pits like the technology which has been brought to us by the "space age."

      OK; a reasonable argument. Minimally it costs $450 million to launch a space shuttle (that's assuming nothing goes wrong like explosions, etc). Now, lets take some of the spin-off technologies that were mentioned: artificial limbs. Now it would seem like artificial limbs could be researched for far less than $450,000,000.00 a day (or the hour or so it takes to fly a space shuttle into space). Of course I'm making assumptions, but I could assumed that the government could just as easily spend 450 million dollars on Earth (and without the transportation and training costs) to subsidize all sorts of artificial and bionic limbs. Realize that this would be money that is not being diverted from scientific research, but it is merely being diverted from transportation into space.

      The same could be said for Zip-lock bags. As for me, I'm a big NASA fan and I hope they do a lot of exploration and science. What I don't want to see is Fanboys who ignorantly tout that we wouldn't have zip-lock bags without spending billions upon billions of dollars on what is mainly just transportation costs. I personally think spending billions of dollars for R & D for the possible spin-off of a civilian use product like a zip-lock bag is inefficient and probably something that, like artificial limbs, could just as easily be produced by private industry. It is far cheeper to fun a war, and wars are the mechanism that inspired the prosthetics industry. If people have moral hang-ups on war than they could just spend a money on things like prevention and education (at the very least) and robotics that directly effects little children getting real robot arms. A one day flight into space would certainly pay for a lot of research and development that wouldn't be just a lucky civilian spin-off. But hey, NASA is better at PR than cripples are. If you asked somebody that was paralyzed if they would rather have the money spent on spinal research or on NASA for possible spin-off effects that could possibly help spinal research, I'm guessing people would choose NASA because NASA fanboys have better arguments and get modded Insightful. Or maybe not. Maybe its just a disingenuous argument that is lacking in thoughtfulness and honesty, and maybe, just maybe people people are getting upset because I'm calling them out on reality.

    27. Re:NASA won by JustOK · · Score: 2, Funny

      42 science per dollar, at today's exchange rate

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    28. Re:NASA won by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      Being a Fanboy, whether it be a Mac Fanboy, a Religious Fanboy, a NASA Fanboy, or any type of Fanboy for that matter, will never help an argument. Just because you and your people label me Troll does not mean you win an argument.

      I don't really care one way or the other on this particular issue, but I am absolutely sick of this sort of thing. Yes, calling someone a "troll" is a mindless way of dismissing someone, every bit as logically invalid as "reductio ad Hitlerum". That's old news. But why can nobody figure out that dismissing a "fanboy" is the EXACT SAME TACTIC?

      Just because you and your people label him Troll does not mean you win an argument.

      Oh, PS: Your argument isn't much better than his. I'll give you "honest", just because I believe in presumption of innocence. "Based on logic" I'm not so sure about. The pyramids are just about the worst counterexample I can think of. I sure wouldn't consider the thousands of man-years of slave labor for a fancy tomb a great alternative, or at best not much different, to the NASA "money pit".

      Not only that, but if you're wanting to prove that earth based science gives you more "scientific knowledge per dollar", it would be helpful if you could tell us how much scientific knowledge per dollar your example brought us. Oh wait - we don't even know how much scientific it gave us at all, let alone a rate (ignoring for now the basic quantifiability issues others have mocked).

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    29. Re:NASA won by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      Dang, no matter how many times I proofread I just never catch them all till I hit "submit"...

      Just because you and your people label him fanboy does not mean you win an argument.

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    30. Re:NASA won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot Tang!

    31. Re:NASA won by tgd · · Score: 1

      All right, but apart from the Pretty Pictures, Light-Emitting Diodes, Infrared Ear Thermometers, DeBakey's Ventricular Assist Device, Artificial Limbs, Aircraft Anti-Icing Systems, Highway Safety Grooving, Improved Radial Tires, Chemical Detection, Video Enhancing and Analysis Systems, Land Mine Removal, Fire-Resistant Reinforcement, Firefighting Equipment, Temper Foam, Enriched Baby Food, Portable Cordless Vacuums, Freeze Drying Technology, Water Purification, Solar Energy, Pollution Remediation, Better Virtual Software, Structural Analysis, Internet-Connected Ovens, Powdered Lubricants, Improved Mine Safety and Food Safety Systems, what have we ever gotten from NASA?

      If they invented the shift key, I'm comin' after them...

    32. Re:NASA won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All right, but apart from the Pretty Pictures, Light-Emitting Diodes, Infrared Ear Thermometers, DeBakey's Ventricular Assist Device, Artificial Limbs, Aircraft Anti-Icing Systems, Highway Safety Grooving, Improved Radial Tires, Chemical Detection, Video Enhancing and Analysis Systems, Land Mine Removal, Fire-Resistant Reinforcement, Firefighting Equipment, Temper Foam, Enriched Baby Food, Portable Cordless Vacuums, Freeze Drying Technology, Water Purification, Solar Energy, Pollution Remediation, Better Virtual Software, Structural Analysis, Internet-Connected Ovens, Powdered Lubricants, Improved Mine Safety and Food Safety Systems, what have we ever gotten from NASA?

      Peace?

    33. Re:NASA won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what have we ever gotten from NASA?

      You forgot a 3 billion dollar rock thrown at Mars.

    34. Re:NASA won by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      All right, but apart from the Pretty Pictures, Light-Emitting Diodes, Infrared Ear Thermometers, [...] and Food Safety Systems, what have we ever gotten from NASA?

      The Aqueduct?

    35. Re:NASA won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Score -1, fortune cookie

    36. Re:NASA won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tang

    37. Re:NASA won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a rash from NASA, but I can' talk about that night as the paternity test results are still pending.

    38. Re:NASA won by Trillian_1138 · · Score: 1

      ...Freeze Drying Technology, Water Purification, Solar Energy, Pollution Remediation, Better Virtual Software, Structural Analysis, Internet-Connected Ovens, Powdered Lubricants, Improved Mine Safety and Food Safety Systems...

      Wait, what? I'm very pro-NASA, and in favor of human and robotic space exploration in general, but I don't know that an internet-connected oven is what we want the general public to have as their go-to example when thinking, "What good has NASA done for me lately?"

      -Trillian

    39. Re:NASA won by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

      Sometimes just pointing out illogic with illogic has its point. I am self-aware. There's method to my madness. It does bring out the hypocrisy in the Moderation process.

    40. Re:NASA won by mokus000 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes just pointing out illogic with illogic has its point. I am self-aware. There's method to my madness. It does bring out the hypocrisy in the Moderation process.

      Responding to poorly formulated arguments with carefully crafted unsound arguments with the intent to convince the less attentive or less intelligent readers of your position is very dishonest and manipulative. If you're really doing that, I'd say that you're absolutely worthy of the title "troll". And much worse.

      And by the way: Hypocrisy is another red herring. Everyone is hypocritical. Hypocrisy in a debater does not make his or her arguments unsound.

      --
      Additive identity, multiplicative cancellation, distributive multiplication over addition: pick any two (unless 1 = 0)
    41. Re:NASA won by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Eh, could be...I wouldn't know. At least it's not Hallmark. I hope it isn't anyway. That would suck.

      --
      What?
  5. oh no by hort_wort · · Score: 1

    This is awful. I've heard him pronounce his *own* name different ways on his show. Oh well, maybe the astronauts will cut off the beginning and just call it the Bert module. I mean, if they scrape some paint off, what can we do?

    1. Re:oh no by argent · · Score: 2, Funny

      maybe the astronauts will cut off the beginning and just call it the Bert module

      The next module has to be "Ernie".

    2. Re:oh no by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      Oh well, maybe the astronauts will cut off the beginning and just call it the Bert module.

      Yet another reason to include bears on the threatdown.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    3. Re:oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on who he's referring to. The character on the show is pronounced Cole-bare. The actor who stars in the show is pronounced Cole-bert. And yes, the character and the actor are two different personas.

    4. Re:oh no by iminplaya · · Score: 1

      Why not? The Apollo 10 lunar module was named Snoopy and the command module Charlie Brown. Miss Piggy would be more appropriate for the ISS.

      --
      What?
    5. Re:oh no by EvanED · · Score: 1

      The actor who stars in the show is pronounced Cole-bert.

      If this is true, it's not just The Colbert Report where he's pronounced it that way. That goes back to his Daily Show days; indeed even before Jon Stewart arrived on the scene, Craig Kilborn introduced him as "Cole-bare." I've also always heard him introduced on other shows the same way.

      In other words, [citation needed].

    6. Re:oh no by Don_dumb · · Score: 1
      You are correct the gp loses. Wikipedia quotes This text Quoted below for the lazy:=

      NAME: Originally, his name was pronounced COL-bert. "But my dad always wanted to be Col-BEAR ... so (he) said to us, 'You can be anything you want.' And so we made a choice, and it's about half and half. The girls for the most part are like, 'Get over it, you're Colbert,' but I was so young when this choice was given to us, I think that if somebody woke me up in the middle of the night and slapped me across the face I'd still say Stephen Col-BEAR. But if people don't like what I do on this show, I say, 'That's Stephen Col-BEAR, I'm Stephen Colbert.' "

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  6. Slight Exageration by Yankumi · · Score: 3, Informative

    I hardly think that a 3.3% margin of defeat is worthy of the adjective "clobbering".

    1. Re:Slight Exageration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check your math. 230k votes to 190k votes is more than a 3.3% margin.

    2. Re:Slight Exageration by Yankumi · · Score: 1

      40,000 votes is 3.3% of the total 1,200,000 votes

    3. Re:Slight Exageration by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I take it you skipped a few lessons in maths... and common sense.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    4. Re:Slight Exageration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      He's just using % to mean percentage points. I wouldn't do it, but I don't think it's unheard of. Your arrogance s unwarranted.

    5. Re:Slight Exageration by Yankumi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heh, maybe I used the wrong terminology but after rounding the total vote count to 1.2 million. Colbert won 19.2% of the vote and Serenity garnered 15.9% of votes cast. That's just not a landslide.

  7. Not all bad by SoapBox17 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really naming it the "Colbert" room isn't as lame as if everyone voted for "i can haz space station" or something. Plus he may have actually raised public awareness of space programs a little bit. He certainly drove traffic to NASA's website. And if 200,000 people actually voted for him, you can imagine how many people voted for a "real" option or read some of the NASA content.

    1. Re:Not all bad by Yankumi · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that it wasn't 200,000 people voting for him, it's that people voted 200,000 times. Each person could vote once/perday/per IP. So one person could have easily voted dozens to hundreds of times depending on how fanatical they were.

    2. Re:Not all bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "i can haz space station" ? Damn, NOW you tell us? That was a great name!

    3. Re:Not all bad by TheSync · · Score: 1

      "Colbert" could also refer to:

      Jean-Baptiste Colbert (1619-1683), French minister of finance under King Louis XIV
      Claudette Colbert (1903-1996), American actress
      Robert Colbert (b. 1931), American television actor and star of "The Time Tunnel"
      Edwin Harris Colbert (1905-2001), American vertebrate paleontologist
      Holmes Colbert, developer of the Chickasaw Nation's constitution in the 1850s

      Lest you laugh, six ships of the French Navy have borne the name Colbert in honour of Jean-Baptiste Colbert.

      Personally, I think they should have sold the naming rights. "Microsoft ISS Node 3" has a great ring to it!

    4. Re:Not all bad by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      But not everyone is that fanatical. Even if one guy votes 50 times, most people won't, which probably puts the average somewhere around 1-4 votes per person.

      This is funny, though. :D Congrats - he's now immortalized in history.

    5. Re:Not all bad by jd · · Score: 1

      9 out of 10 kittehs agree and would like to perform experiments involving hocking up hairballs in zero gravity.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    6. Re:Not all bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, and it could also be John Colbert, 6th grader at Jack London Elementary - so what is your point? We all know that it was a write-in campaign by Steven Colbert.

    7. Re:Not all bad by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is no way in hell that we could send up astronauts until we finish "Microsoft ISS Node 3.11(for workgroups)".

    8. Re:Not all bad by JustOK · · Score: 1

      9 out of 10 kittehs agree and would like to perform experiments involving hocking up hairballs in zero gravity.

      There is no up in which to hock in zero g. Mention pussy and geeks get all confused.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    9. Re:Not all bad by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      What with the 'freedom fries' kick Americans went on and the fact that the French navy uses 'Colbert' in their naming so much, I'm pretty sure that's a "-1 foreign" rating from Nasa.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  8. What will the full name be? by bunratty · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Colbert Spaceport?

    --
    What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
  9. Not so fast... by memorycardfull · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the article: "NASA reserves the right to choose an appropriate name."

    1. Re:Not so fast... by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      And I hope they will.

      I was sort of hoping the Myyearbook guys would carry the vote, because then the case would have been even clearer: There is no way they'd have used such a ridiculous name. With Colbert, I'm less sure but I can still hope.

      I concur with the summary: They should have never allowed write-ins.

    2. Re:Not so fast... by memorycardfull · · Score: 1

      "Colbert" doesn't seem much more ridiculous than "Serenity" to me. They named the first space shuttle after the U.S.S. Enterpise NCC-1701! My guess is the only reason why "Serenity" was even in the race was Joss Whedon fans. I agree with you about the write-ins. My vote was for "Junk Dodger", FWIW. It was the only name officially offered by NASA that really appealed to me.

    3. Re:Not so fast... by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Colbert just made the top of the list of the "Top Ten Suggestions". NASA is naming it Serenity with 70% of the official votes.

      I'm sure Joss Whedon fans may have had something to do with it, but naming Node 3 'Serenity' after Node 1 was named 'Unity' and Node 2 was named 'Harmony' doesn't seem that odd.

    4. Re:Not so fast... by Cassini2 · · Score: 1

      I don't think you can blame the choice of Serenity on Joss Whedon fans. NASA simply had a rather lame list of names, and Serenity was the best by far. The other choices were: Earthrise (9%), Legacy (13%), and Venture (8%).

      I just couldn't bring myself to vote for anything other than Serenity or Colbert. Colbert is better than Legacy, NASA's second best choice. I really don't want mankind's Legacy to be a room on a space station. Surely we can come up with something better than that ...

      Fan's of the BBC show, "Yes, Minister", will have a different perspective. The will argue that the choice was a conjuring trick. Someone at NASA loved Serenity and rigged the contest for it to win. Although, I'm not sure any /. readers will remember the political ins and outs of Yes, Minister.

    5. Re:Not so fast... by memorycardfull · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed it doesn't seem odd at all. It is as if they are naming it exactly what they decided to name it prior to this false exercise in allowing people to vote on the name.

    6. Re:Not so fast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, hoe dare they involve the plebeians in the grande process of governance?

    7. Re:Not so fast... by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      They named the first space shuttle after the U.S.S. Enterpise NCC-1701!

      And it was a write-in campaign that got the name changed to Enterprise from Constellation.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    8. Re:Not so fast... by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      I mean constitution.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    9. Re:Not so fast... by memorycardfull · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was a bit of a shame. Despite everything that happened, NCC-1017 was a fine ship and Captain Matt Decker was a good man. Ultimately the sacrifice of the Captain, crew and ship saved countless systems and billions of lives from the planet killer.

    10. Re:Not so fast... by ivan256 · · Score: 1

      The name should reflect the spirit of exploration and cooperation embodied by the space station, and follow in the tradition set by Node 1- Unity- and Node 2- Harmony.

      Chances of it being named "Colbert"? Nil.

    11. Re:Not so fast... by DesScorp · · Score: 1

      From the article: "NASA reserves the right to choose an appropriate name."

      Good

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    12. Re:Not so fast... by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      Ahh, democracy in action.

    13. Re:Not so fast... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      And it was a write-in campaign that got the name changed to Enterprise from Constellation.

      I thought NCC1701 and NCC1701-A were Constitution class ships. Stargazer was Constellation class.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    14. Re:Not so fast... by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      In the original series, Constellation was also of the same (Constitution-) class as Enterprise. By the time of TNG, there was a class of ships called Constellation, of which Stargazer was an example.

  10. Re:Democracy at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're saying that the way Obama speaks is "bombastic?" I don't think you know what that word means.

  11. Honorable Way Out for NASA by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Name it something else, but hang a signed picture of Colbert in the module. The fans are satisfied, a reasonable name can be applied, and Colbert gets a talking point for a show.

    But please, for the love of God, no dancing! Colbert dancing with that freaky grin always creeps me out.

    1. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by demi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would they need a way out? NASA had the chance to honor a scientist or engineer, but decided not to--Serenity doesn't honor anything but entertainment, and neither does Colbert, or Tek Jansen for that matter.

      --
      demi
    2. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by maxume · · Score: 1

      Colbert is a reasonable name. At least as reasonable as Apollo.

      They should just call every module "seven" anyway.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by cashman73 · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Name it something else, but hang a signed picture of Colbert in the module.

      Umm, that could be a little bit difficult,... you do know that there's no gravity up there, so the picture will just float off the wall,...

    4. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by gardyloo · · Score: 5, Funny

      They'll just affix it somehow with some massive brass balls.

    5. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure we solved a similar problem here on earth... if I could only think what it was... perhaps fixing it in place with one of hundreds of different products...

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    6. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      They should just call every module "seven" anyway.

      Not such a bad idea. Get Microsoft to put up some big bucks for it.

      Just as long as it doesn't crash....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by PotatoSan · · Score: 1

      ...you're joking about Serenity, right?

    8. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by mqduck · · Score: 1

      You don't get it, he's a parody of a megalomaniac. *wink*

      --
      Property is theft.
    9. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised they didn't go with Tek Jansen in the first place.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    10. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Name it something else, but hang a signed picture of Colbert in the module.

      Umm, that could be a little bit difficult,... you do know that there's no gravity up there, so the picture will just float off the wall,...

      NASA developed Velcro for that very reason.

    11. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by jd · · Score: 1

      Calling the modules Seven would make no sense unless the command module is called Blake.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    12. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Grissom (to be known as Gus)

    13. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean Blake Stone?

    14. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by MiKM · · Score: 5, Informative

      I liked Serenity not because of the show, but because it fits well with the other two modules Unity and Harmony. If this were the first to be named, I'd definitely advocate honoring a scientists, but as sysadmin knows, having a consistent naming scheme is nice.

    15. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by Schmorgluck · · Score: 1

      Actually, George de Mestral did.
      But yeah, NASA did much to popularize it.

      --
      There's nothing like $HOME
    16. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by laird · · Score: 1

      "Calling the modules Seven would make no sense unless the command module is called Blake." ... or if there are 9 modules (and the program director *really* liked Voyager).

    17. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Serenity, tranquility, peace.... man i think im having flashbacks!

    18. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Also, it's a freaking toilet that allegedly makes your waste products "drinkable" again. "Serenity" is like a heavy-handed way of imposing denial about this from the PR department. In comparison, "Colbert" is just fun.

    19. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by JustOK · · Score: 1

      I'd dock with that

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    20. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could always name it the 'Steven T Colbert Serenity module'. That way for day to day communication, it would be called Serenity. But they would award the top vote receiver.

      NASA officials could show up on his show and present a plaque with a picture of the module and the name under it. Everyone would be happy.

    21. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by AMuse · · Score: 1

      You realize that "Serenity" was not put in place as one of the official names due to any SciFi connection right, and that it's just coincidental that the name means anything the SF fans.... right?

    22. Re:Honorable Way Out for NASA by internic · · Score: 1

      NASA had the chance to honor a scientist or engineer, but decided not to

      I think that would be a fairly ironic choice, since most scientists I've ever heard talk about it consider the ISS a total waste of time for PR purposes, sucking up NASA resources that would otherwise be used for legitimate science.

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
  12. Re:Uncritical media breaks democracy by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yep, I guess the difference lies in "to kill hundreds of thousands of people".

    --
    You just got troll'd!
  13. My write in by arun84h · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wrote in "Candlejack", and apparently i was the onl

    1. Re:My write in by zaxus · · Score: 5, Funny

      I wish I had mod points. Best post I've seen in a long time. Candlejack! That's just bril

      --
      /. zen: Imagine a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf clusters...
    2. Re:My write in by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What's with this "Candlejack" meme anyway? Every t

    3. Re:My write in by Ragzouken · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's kind of Candlejack to press the subm

    4. Re:My write in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm...can someone explain this?

    5. Re:My write in by Viadd · · Score: 1

      Unfortinly, Candlejack dosnt prev

    6. Re:My write in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      It's a silly thing related to tons of urban myths where if you say a name, that person/force/thing will kidnap you. So, the joke is that "Candlejack" works on the internet, too, to steal awa

    7. Re:My write in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cANDLEJACK IS TEH

    8. Re:My write in by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      No clue. I'm already sick of seeing the name "Candeljack".

    9. Re:My write in by Wordplay · · Score: 1

      Oops... s/Candeljack/Candlejack

    10. Re:My write in by Subm · · Score: 1

      > It's kind of Candlejack to press the subm

      Did somebody call?

    11. Re:My write in by Omestes · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had to look up that attempt at a meme... I should have guessed it is from 4chan/b/ since it isn't funny, and has no intellectual appeal for anyone above perhaps fourteen.

      I miss the days when /. had its own lame memes, and didn't have to import them from a bunch of adolescents. At least then the memes were fitting of the medium, meaning somewhat dorky.

      Sorry for the nasty post, I just don't get the humor.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    12. Re:My write in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you now I have to web search it.
      Jack sounds like a verb, and my personal web rule #1 is: Don't google verbs. Especially not images.

    13. Re:My write in by junglee_iitk · · Score: 1

      happens :)

    14. Re:My write in by alexburke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can you losers quit this "Candlejack" bullsh

    15. Re:My write in by niktemadur · · Score: 2, Funny

      I miss the days when /. had its own lame memes, and didn't have to import them from a bunch of adolescents.

      Well I, for one, welcome our new 4chan... I can't go through with this, sorry.

      OK, there's still a chance to vindicate myself here, how about this one:
      In the new ISS Name Contest, where was the CowboyNeal option?

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    16. Re:My write in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Candlejack here? Really I expected more from Slashd-

    17. Re:My write in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, there's still a chance to vindicate myself here, how about this one:
      In the new ISS Name Contest, where was the CowboyNeal option?

      Candlejack hijacked it you insens

    18. Re:My write in by PakProtector · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am tired of this God Damned Shit.

      4chan did not create the Candlejack meme. It existed long before 4chan did. Years before I ever saw a 'funny picture' of Candlejack on the internet, my friends and I made the Candlejack joke all the damn time.

      See, once upon a time, there was a show called Freakazoid!. It was funny as hell, but its target audience (children) didn't quite understand the humour.

      However, some of us still have fond memories of the show, as it's one of those rare gems that gets funnier as you get older -- because you can appreciate more of the humour.

      For the love of $DEITY, quick giving 4chan credit it doesn't deserve.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    19. Re:My write in by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      "Candlejack" is a silly myth. It's just some bullsh

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    20. Re:My write in by StarWreck · · Score: 1

      We still have our own memes, you insensitive clod!

      Now imagine a beowulf cluster of Colbert space station modules!!

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    21. Re:My write in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Candlejack comes from Freakazoid, which was kinda dorky in it's own right. I fail to see how this doesn't apply to dor

    22. Re:My write in by Caboosian · · Score: 1

      I had to look up that attempt at a meme... I should have guessed it is from 4chan/b/ since it isn't funny, and has no intellectual appeal for anyone above perhaps fourteen.

      I miss the days when /. had its own lame memes, and didn't have to import them from a bunch of adolescents. At least then the memes were fitting of the medium, meaning somewhat dorky.

      Yes, I too miss the clearly adult memes of Natalie Portman (featuring Hot Grits), In Soviet Russia, Cowboy Neal, and Sharks with frickin' laser beams.

      Maybe it's just me, but perhaps you're confusing the Slashdot community with another one. At the very least you've painted an overly pretty and geeky picture of this community - geeks are just as stupid and adolescent as anyone else.

      Or maybe you just broke your funny bone. You should probab

  14. Re:Democracy at work by peragrin · · Score: 0

    It does explain how bush won twice.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  15. Moot / 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    On a similar note, what will Time do if Moot wins the #1 most influential person of the year?

    http://www.time.com/time/specials/packages/article/0,28804,1883644_1886141,00.html

    1. Re:Moot / 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Time.com will get v& for *ahem* researching while putting together a point form article re: moot.

      Mysteriously tho, all the webpage links they bookmarked are 404 and no article is ever written.

    2. Re:Moot / 4chan by initialE · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The year in which an historical american president takes office, the year the world's economy went bust due to the head honchos at AIG, and moot wins? This is perspective?

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    3. Re:Moot / 4chan by Microlith · · Score: 1

      It's an acknowledgment of how easily skewed online polls are.

      On top of that, it's easy to mobilize people who spend large amounts of time on the internet to do something that is, effectively, trivial.

    4. Re:Moot / 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt they'll change anything; their blurb looks like they have unbiased coverage of 4chan. Seems pretty legitimate to me.

    5. Re:Moot / 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for telling me about this. Now I can vote him up and everyone else DOWN!

    6. Re:Moot / 4chan by Tsu-na-mi · · Score: 1

      If moot makes the top 100 anywhere, I will have newfound respect for TIME magazine, but yeah, if Obama doesn't get #1, I'd be surprised.

      --
      I've built up so much character I have an alter-ego
    7. Re:Moot / 4chan by drew · · Score: 1

      While AIG was perhaps the most visible due to the incredible amount of money that's been required to prop them up, they were merely one in a large chain of dominoes.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
    8. Re:Moot / 4chan by ErichTheWebGuy · · Score: 1

      what will Time do

      Win.

      --
      bash: rtfm: command not found
  16. So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by StCredZero · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if he'd let it be named Serenity for a date with Inara Serra / Morena Baccarin?

    1. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why exactly does a married father need a date with a random actress?

    2. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why exactly does a married father need a date with a random actress?

      Apparently you've never been married.

    3. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by tool462 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apparently you are not a married father. ;)

    4. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I am fully in favor of the fact that you've been modded +3 insightful.

    5. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Bozzio · · Score: 1

      OOOoooh... and just one minute too late.

      Better luck next time!

      --
      I just pooped your party.
    6. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by sc00p18 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh c'mon, dude!
       
      She's not a random actress, she's a Companion.

    7. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why exactly does a married father need a date with the actress who plays television's hottest space whore?

      There, fixed that for you. (Somehow, despite being a /.er, you have managed to never watch a single episode of Firefly.)

    8. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather date a woman with a chin.

    9. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by snowgirl · · Score: 2

      Oh c'mon, dude!

      She's not a random actress, she's a Companion.

      Oh, the companion... I thought it was the engine girl... hahaha

      Just goes to show you that the sexes don't know what interests the other side....

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    10. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by g0at · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why do these "marriage is so harsh" sort of jokes always get moderated as "insightful" rather than "funny" (or "overrated")? Sad.

    11. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I like engine girl. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    12. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by happyemoticon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny and insightful are not mutually exclusive. Clearly those mods were awarded by someone who found resonance with the truth illucidated therein. Even if they don't outright want to mess around, certainly it now strikes them as incredibly naive that someone would think a married father unlikely to see a whore or cheat.

    13. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Forcepath · · Score: 2, Informative

      Kaylee is by far the hottest actress from Firefly. Just sayin'

      --
      this .sig for sale
    14. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Just goes to show you that the sexes don't know what interests the other side....

      Sure we do! For women, in order of importance, it's:

      1. Money
      2. Status
      3. Humour
      4. Intelligence
      5. Physical appearance

      For men, in order of importance, it's:

      1. ..
      2. ...
      3. ....
      4. .....
      5. BOOBIES!

    15. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by aetherworld · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why do these "marriage is so harsh" sort of jokes always get moderated as "insightful"...

      Apparently you've never been married.

    16. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by quenda · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do these "marriage is so harsh" sort of jokes always get moderated as "insightful

      The moderators are married. Marriage is OK, but there are two big points:

      • ladies: your man will never change. His faults will not go away when you marry.
      • gents: your wife will change.

      Just get a written agreement on everything before you marry. Work, kids education, number of kids, money, ... Including minimum frequency of sex. It may seem awkard, but it is so much easier that way.

    17. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apperantly you've never been married

    18. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She is a cube ?

    19. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get a written agreement on everything before you marry. Work, kids education, number of kids, money, ... Including minimum frequency of sex. It may seem awkard, but it is so much easier that way.

      I'd rather have those things happen out of love than because of a contract.

    20. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Chousuke · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ahh, damn. Is it somehow possible to moderate the moderation of this post as +5, Funny?

    21. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by quenda · · Score: 1

      You do know that marriage is a contract, don't you?

    22. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      I like engine girl. :)

      A LOT of married slashdotters do :) Because she knows stuff about things, and things about stuff.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    23. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As an unmarried slashdotter, let me say:

      My name is geminidomino, and I approve parent's message. Kaylee smokes Inara any day.

    24. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      For men, in order of importance, it's:

      1. ..
      2. ...
      3. ....
      4. .....
      5. BOOBIES!

      You liar...

      "BOOBIES" should be #2. (#1 being "bool putsOut")

    25. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The woman would just ignore the contract. My ex-wife (like so many wives) had a wonderfully self-serving memory. I could have gotten it in writing, had her sign it, and held it right in front of her face--and she still would have denied ever agreeing to it. They ALWAYS change after you marry them. David Letterman has been with Regina Lasko for 23 years together. They have a kid, and have lived together most of that time. And he finally married her last week. And I guarantee you, she has already begun to change from the woman he knew a week ago.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    26. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Screw that. Summer Glau and Jewel Staite were the breakout hotties on that show. Glau is even better now that she has gained a little weight and doesn't have the body of a 12-year-old anorexic boy.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    27. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by kisrael · · Score: 1

      Man my kingdom, or maybe former marriage, for some mod points...

      --
      SO YOU'RE GOING TO DIE: The Comic for Dealing with Death
    28. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      She's not a random actress, she's a Companion.

      All actresses are.

    29. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by oahazmatt · · Score: 1

      People, people. No need to argue about this, we can settle this reasonably.

      On one hand, you have Inara. On the other hand, you have Kaylee. So all we need to do is--

      *rubs hands together*

      Y'know, I think I just got a better idea.

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
    30. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by PriceIke · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'll be in my bunk.

      --
      It's not a lie. It's the truth with lossy compression.
    31. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      Kaylee smokes Inara any day.

      Now there's a thought to keep a man warm on a cold night...

      Wait, am I read that wrong?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    32. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      Eh, not really, just more televised. I'm sure if Whedon had tossed out a reference to the contest in front of Dollhouse that Serenity would have won.

    33. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe me, plenty of guys liked engine girl. That's why they hired her for Stargate Atlantis.

    34. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Mikkeles · · Score: 1

      Yes, but with the State, not each other.

      --
      Great minds think alike; fools seldom differ.
    35. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And vows are?

    36. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by jafac · · Score: 1

      IIRC, on more than one occasion, such a smoking was implied. Kaylee did spend a lot of time hanging out in Inara's room.

      Just sayin'

      Long voyages. Romantic complications with the male characters. Bored hot chicks. Hypothetical futuristic culture unburdened with the moralistic medieval psychosexual baggage we, in the present, are. (hmmm. I think I just figured out WHY I'm such a big fan of Science Fiction. . . )

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    37. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Browncoats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahahaha .... sorry, you're not married, are you?

  17. Too bad slashdot... by gillbates · · Score: 1

    Didn't enter the contest.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
    1. Re:Too bad slashdot... by Schmorgluck · · Score: 1

      Oh yeaaah, It would have made the other modules crash!

      --
      There's nothing like $HOME
    2. Re:Too bad slashdot... by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Technically we did... They posted a story about Colbert's antics while people were still able to vote. Presumably a good portion of slashdotters like myself threw their vote in for Colbert too.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  18. Who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just proves that people will do whatever someone on the tv tells them to do. Does it surprise anyone that the winning name wasn't the name of a great scientist?

    1. Re:Who cares? by rackserverdeals · · Score: 1

      Doesn't look like Nasa even suggested the name of a great scientist eiter. Unless Legacy, Serenity, Earthrise and Venture are scientists I don't know about.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
  19. don't trust to hope by Eil · · Score: 1

    Before you get too excited, note that "Colbert" won the online poll.

    Which is a completely different thing than actually getting the space station module named after him.

    1. Re:don't trust to hope by owlnation · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Which is a completely different thing than actually getting the space station module named after him.

      Why shouldn't it be named after him? After all, it makes sense. Bear in mind that there's a lot of people watch the Colbert Report who are not necessarily Space Nerds. But they are people who have political interests, and are active voters. Do you not think it would actually be a really really good thing to have them interested in what NASA is doing? And thus help fund other things?

      Colbert is great about generating publicity, the Colbert Bump is real -- so why not bump NASA? Who really cares what the craft is called if it will help NASA?

    2. Re:don't trust to hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a lot more than 200,000 voters. Many of them, including me, will be less likely to support this if the name it after this self-aggrandizing idiot.

    3. Re:don't trust to hope by Digero · · Score: 1

      But what if the Colbert bump knocks it out of orbit?

    4. Re:don't trust to hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, they should name it "Limbaugh."

      </sarcasm>

      You do realize that this "self-aggrandizing idiot" is a parody of your heroes, right?

  20. News from 2015 by TinBromide · · Score: 0, Troll

    "Stephen Colbert gets drunk and runs over a widow and her three childeren. He then goes on and exposes himself to a church choir. Colbert is undergoing drug testing. [...] Nasa plans for a decommissioning of the Colbert module by burning up in the atmosphere."

    Yeah, right, like they'll name a module after someone who has given and done absolutely nothing for/to the space program.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    1. Re:News from 2015 by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      "Stephen Colbert gets drunk and runs over a widow and her three childeren. He then goes on and exposes himself to a church choir. Colbert is undergoing drug testing. [...] Nasa plans for a decommissioning of the Colbert module by burning up in the atmosphere."

      That's why you name these things after Statesmen.

      Statesmen are dead politicians.

      Lord knows, we need more Statesmen. (Apologies to Berkeley Breathed)

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:News from 2015 by Narishma · · Score: 3, Informative

      You clearly don't watch his show. He often talks about Nasa and space stuff. He even did a couple of interviews with astronauts aboard the ISS.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    3. Re:News from 2015 by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      I do watch the show, but if you think that a couple of interviews with astronauts and talking about space stuff is grounds for naming, by all means, go ahead.

      Personally, I think he's given more to the Saginaw Spirit than NASA. But i guess that's ok, they did name something after him.

      By the way, how would you feel if he did the above acts that I mentioned? How would YOU have felt if NASA named something after Mel Gibson before his anti-semetic tirade? Or OJ Simpson before he killed his wife?

      My point is, it'd be insane to name something after a living person. While people will find stuff in space named after living people, generally those people discovered something or gave a great deal more than "talks about Nasa and space stuff [...] even [...] a couple of interviews with astronauts aboard the ISS."

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    4. Re:News from 2015 by vux984 · · Score: 1

      My point is, it'd be insane to name something after a living person.

      Yeah.

      I mean look at all those pre-WWII restaurant's and companies etc... Adolph & Sons Exports, J. Hitler's Bistro, Hilter's Bar and Grill... they were left with no option but to just fold over into infamy and destitution.

      Of course, the fact that hey were named after their proprietors before the infamous one was even was in politics is their fault too... and yeah... they were just "insane" to name things to something that could be turned so distasteful. Blame it on their utter lack of omniscience.

      Or they could just rename the god-damned thing to something else should Colbert ...whether the one with a TV show, or the future fascist genocidal dictator of the Republic of Fictionland casts an evil specter onto the name...

      That's how we usually deal with this problem.

      A lot of things NASA does really are rocket science... this isn't one of them.

    5. Re:News from 2015 by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      I bet that those establishments were named after Der Fuhrer.

      By the way, I call Godwin's Law. You lose.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    6. Re:News from 2015 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the way, how would you feel if he did the above acts that I mentioned? How would YOU have felt if NASA named something after Mel Gibson before his anti-semetic tirade? Or OJ Simpson before he killed his wife?

      "The person known on Slashdot as Tin Bromide was found dead yesterday evening from a heroine overdose, after he killed and raped the corpses of four women, three young boys, and one dog in a drunken orgy."

      How would you feel if you did the above acts that I mentioned?

      Or maybe, hypothetical bad acts that have no basis in reality have no bearing on present events?

      Even dead people have bad things they've done in life. Go ahead, read up on any of the founding fathers, then think again next time you hear the name "Thomas Jefferson" put on something...

    7. Re:News from 2015 by neomunk · · Score: 1

      Godwin's Law is the 2nd dumbest bit of conventional internet wisdom I can think of, the first being "never attribute to malice that which can be played off as an accident", or however people want to word its equivalent. They really are quite similar in application; someone who can't be bothered to think about something needs a quick way to dismiss an inconvenient (but usually accurate) analogy, so they whip out some "law".

      And, so you know next time, declaring yourself a winner of a conversation is high-level asshattery comparable to public-restroom-shit-porn trolling, most especially if you lean on one of the fake bits of "wisdom" I mentioned above.

      Now get back in there an debate on the merits of your argument, dammit.

    8. Re:News from 2015 by vux984 · · Score: 1

      I bet that those establishments were named after Der Fuhrer.

      Yeah, because he was the only person in all the world named Adolph.

      By the way, I call Godwin's Law. You lose.

      Its only a godwin if its an unwarranted reference. I think its a perfectly applicable example. As its a very real transition that 'unfortunately named' entities had to deal with. btw, There was a "Mount Hitler" that was renamed too.

    9. Re:News from 2015 by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      Here's the deal. My core argument was that if you name something after somebody, its because they did something to earn it. Colbert did nothing beyond allow the glow from his spot light to illuminate NASA for a short time.

      My next point was that if you named something after a living person and they did an atrocity, it would be a bad thing. If it was uncovered that Edwin Hubble raped and killed children, NASA would have more on its plate than a simple renaming meeting.

      If the deli is named after Joe Hitler, who did not do anything more than overcook the pastrami, that's unfortunate, but joe hitler didn't murder millions of people. Having the same name as something is NOT the same as naming something after somebody. If the deli was named after THE Hitler, they might be facing a boycott. If some other Hubble went on a shooting rampage, NASA would not have to answer to anybody, Edwin Hubble earned the honor.

      If NASA named something after somebody who killed people or did stuff, there would ALWAYS be that note. The XXXX station (formerly the Colbert station, but was renamed because of YYYYY)... And so on. There are some times when there is such a thing as bad publicity.

      By the way, it was unwarranted, we were not discussing the 2nd world war, we were not discussing germany, and you were the one who elevated getting drunk and running over a family to the level of killing millions by bringing hitler into this. That's precisely what invoking Godwin's law is supposed to prevent. If you didn't intend to elevate drunk driving and vehicular homicide to the same level as genocide, why weren't you more selective with your example? Leave the truly atrocious people for illuminating and calling the people to act against true atrocities (like genocide).

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    10. Re:News from 2015 by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      By the way, it is for this very reason that NASA should learn from the past (your example of the mass renamings after hitler) and not name anything big after someone who's alive.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    11. Re:News from 2015 by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Colbert did nothing beyond allow the glow from his spot light to illuminate NASA for a short time.

      Fair enough.

      But how is the 2nd runner up, "Serenity" of any greater merit? It was merely selected by some Nasa committee, presumably because it was thematically consistent with some of the already named modules, and was honestly only highly popular with voters because of a spaceship on a TV series/movie. Colbert may not be a terribly good name, but its not like any of the other choices were in any way 'more significant'.

      I mean its not like our choices were between Armstrong, Valentina, Bluford, and Colbert.

      My next point was that if you named something after a living person and they did an atrocity, it would be a bad thing. If it was uncovered that Edwin Hubble raped and killed children, NASA would have more on its plate than a simple renaming meeting.

      "We didn't know anything about it until now. The honor was bestowed for his contributions to Astronomy. Now that this new information out there, clearly its inappropriate to honor him, and we're renaming it immediately."

      Hardly the end of the world. Its not like anyone would really believe it was named the Hubble to secretly honor murder and rape. And yes, while it is a risk, its a small risk... few people in the big scheme of things commit atrocities, and while old people are safer than young people, and dead people are safer than live ones, there is still a risk. For all we know, someone will unearth Hubble's private journal of murder and rape any day now... ok... the odds are low... but are they really that much lower than Colbert murdering and raping children? I'd say they are both: "pretty close to but not quite zilch".

      If NASA named something after somebody who killed people or did stuff, there would ALWAYS be that note. The XXXX station (formerly the Colbert station, but was renamed because of YYYYY)... And so on. There are some times when there is such a thing as bad publicity.

      Meh. I see what your saying, I just don't agree that its really that big of a deal, especially for something as trivial as a single 'module' of a space station. I mean, its probably going to be decommissioned anyway within 10-20 years. Its hardly going to be a permanent stain.

      A school in New York just renamed itself "Barack Obama Elementary School". There's a Barack Obama Avenue in Miami. There's stuff named for the living Bushes, the living Clintons. Are current and former first families safer than a-list comedians? Ok...Probably... but honestly how much safer? What percentage of talk show hosts have committed atrocities?

      By the way, it was unwarranted, we were not discussing the 2nd world war, we were not discussing germany, and you were the one who elevated getting drunk and running over a family to the level of killing millions by bringing hitler into this.

      Ah, but that was my point, that even if someone did [MAXIMUM WORSE] than "get drunk and run over a family" the whole renaming thing really isn't all that big of a deal. For a godwin to be unwarranted, I'd have to (fallaciously) compare something to hitler and then, because "hitler was bad" then "other things is bad too". But in this case I'm saying,

      Its also useful because refutes your point: "If some other Hubble went on a shooting rampage, NASA would not have to answer to anybody, Edwin Hubble earned the honor."

      Perhaps a mere shooting rampage, but if some other Hubble does [MAXIMUM EVIL], Nasa WOULD still have to respond by renaming it, even if Edwin Hubble earned the honor.
      For example, the public isn't going to accept the 'Hitler Space Telescope' named for a hypothetical "Edwin Hitler the astronomer" who earned it. We'd probably, at the very least rename it to the 'Edwin Space Telescope'.

  21. Re:Democracy at work by unlametheweak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The most bombastic speaker who appeals to the most retards wins.

    I don't want to say anything about our current President, but...

    You may be confusing Obama with Bush

  22. Allow me to be the first to say... by altek · · Score: 1

    ... Hahahahahahhahahahahahahhahahaha!!!!!

    --
    THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
    1. Re:Allow me to be the first to say... by bonch · · Score: 1

      Your intelligence overwhelms me.

  23. Better than naming it for an incontinence pad! by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Actually, NASA lucked out.

    What with the problems with the urine recycling system, naming the new lab after an incontinence pad could, if it ever leaked to the press, dampen public enthusiasm and, uh, tick people off.

  24. Re:Democracy at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    It does explain how bush won twice.

    If your speaker isn't very bombastic, you just need more retards.

  25. Pronounced, of course... by ebbomega · · Score: 5, Funny

    Kohl-bear Spayss-pore

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
    1. Re:Pronounced, of course... by Ragzouken · · Score: 1

      Kohl-bert Spays-pert

    2. Re:Pronounced, of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Pronounced, of course... by sagematt · · Score: 1

      Kohl-bert Spays-pert

      Kohl-behr. The "t" is silent.

    4. Re:Pronounced, of course... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      *pumps his shot gun*

      I strongly advise you find another way to phoneticize Coal-bare. Bears are the number one threat to America.

    5. Re:Pronounced, of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well deserved +5 funny, well done..

  26. Would have been "Ron Paul" by TheSync · · Score: 3, Funny

    It would have been "Ron Paul" if it wasn't a socialist space project!

    1. Re:Would have been "Ron Paul" by Abuzar · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for Oprah to get even :-)

  27. Re:Democracy at work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most bombastic speaker who appeals to the most retards wins.

    I know! After all those recounts and chads and supreme court nonsense you would have thought they would have just let Florida vote again and settle it. Al Gore would have probably ended up much thinner. If only he appealed to more retards...

  28. Should have been called... by michaeldot · · Score: 1

    "That's no moon"

    1. Re:Should have been called... by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

      Well there is no point in that. Most of the population is going to be told that anyway.

  29. Serenity eon by Beer+is+good · · Score: 1

    Colbert won the write-in vote. Serenity won the vote

  30. Boombastic by tepples · · Score: 0, Troll

    You're saying that the way Obama speaks is "bombastic?" I don't think you know what that word means.

    That or someone may be trying to make a (racist?) comparison between President Obama and reggae singer Shaggy.

  31. clobbered? by v1 · · Score: 1

    And they complied, with 230,539 votes. That clobbered Serenity, one of the NASA choices, by more than 40,000 votes.

    By 17% does not a clobbering make. More of an "edged out" don'cha think?

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:clobbered? by jd · · Score: 1

      Depends on whether Colbert reads Fantastic Four comics.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:clobbered? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way, only one president has ever been elected with a margin >18%.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:clobbered? by v1 · · Score: 1

      popular vote or electoral?

      Massive difference. (electoral college REALLY needs to go away, it's 100% unjustified today)

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  32. Mistake? by JustinOpinion · · Score: 5, Insightful

    NASA's mistake was allowing write-ins.

    Mistake? How so? It's pretty obvious that the purpose of the naming-competition was to get people involved and excited. To raise NASA's profile and garner some free advertising. By allowing write-ins, they opened the door for Colbert to advertise for them. And apparently he drove some 230,000 people to go check out the NASA site, maybe read some other NASA material, talk about NASA with their friends, and so on.

    I daresay NASA was quite successful in their effort to gain some publicity. Allowing write-ins was evidently not a mistake.

  33. Better than naming it after James Watt by tomhudson · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA mission w. asian-american"

    Where's Hiu?
    Watt!
    What?
    Yes.
    No, I asked, where's Hiu?
    Watt!
    What?
    Exactly!
    Where?
    Watt!
    What?
    Now you've got it!
    Just tell me what's with Hiu
    No, you've got it backwards.
    Who?
    That's what I said.
    Where?
    Watt!
    What?
    I'm glad we cleared that up.
    Let me guess ... you trained with that crazy Depends-toting Lisa Maire Nowak?

    1. Re:Better than naming it after James Watt by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That deserves a "Funny" tag!

    2. Re:Better than naming it after James Watt by joib · · Score: 1

      In case you didn't know, it's part of the classic "Who's on first" by Abbott and Costello

    3. Re:Better than naming it after James Watt by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1

      Gee, really? Thank you, on my home planet we don't have these so-called Abbotts and Costellos. Your willingness to explain the obvious to a traveler like me will be noted in my logs.

  34. End of the World?!!! by mcfatboy93 · · Score: 1

    Ok this is just a bad idea because Aliens will see our space station and see a big sticker of Colbert on the side and then they come to blow us up. Way to go NASA

    --
    Its not my fault, someone put a wall in my way.
  35. vaguely familiar by martas · · Score: 1

    the Colbert nation reminds me of a botnet. one of these days he's going to ask his viewers to overwhelm the NSA's servers.

    1. Re:vaguely familiar by mrsurb · · Score: 1

      By the same logic, slashdot.frontpage == botnet

    2. Re:vaguely familiar by martas · · Score: 1

      well, DUH.

  36. Mod Parent Up by LoverOfJoy · · Score: 1

    The final vote shows Serenity with 70%

    Colbert is just listed in the "Top 10 Suggestions"

    1. Re:Mod Parent Up by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      If you guys had taken a chance to read what was on that page..

      You would find that the 70% is a part of a 100% total which does not include any write-in votes.

      Serenity didnt get 70% of the votes, after-all.. and further, Colbert got nearly as many votes as ALL four of the NASA suggested names... *COMBINED*

      I'm sure that Colbert secretly hopes that NASA does not name it Colbert, because that act would generate YEARS of comedy material.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  37. stupid by p51d007 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Anyone that thinks NASA will pick the idiot from the Comedy channel is sorely mistaken.

  38. Coal bear, except for the WGA strike by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is awful. I've heard him pronounce his *own* name different ways on his show.

    As I understand it, The Colbert Report is "the coal bear rapport" most of the time, but it was temporarily changed to "the coal bert report" during the first quarter of 2008 to signify the more improvisational format that the striking Writers Guild of America forced on Colbert. Likewise, The Daily Show got replaced with A Daily Show .

    1. Re:Coal bear, except for the WGA strike by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Coal bare. I think he would resent being associated with bears, the number one threat to America.

    2. Re:Coal bear, except for the WGA strike by LordKronos · · Score: 2, Informative

      He also often pronounces the T when talking to himself, like "get a grip, Colbert"

    3. Re:Coal bear, except for the WGA strike by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      It's an easy threat to deal with: you simply need a Constitutional amendment to remove the right to arm bears.

    4. Re:Coal bear, except for the WGA strike by nine-times · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, The Colbert Report is "the coal bear rapport"

      Did it strike you as funny that you used a word with a silent "T" in order to clarify the pronunciation of a word that's being pronounced with a silent "T" even though it's not supposed to be pronounced that way?

    5. Re:Coal bear, except for the WGA strike by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      exactly, it's funny to think that he really pronounces his name 'wrong' but pretends not to for the show.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    6. Re:Coal bear, except for the WGA strike by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I noticed too. Its irony.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    7. Re:Coal bear, except for the WGA strike by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not irony at all.

  39. Re:Uncritical media breaks democracy by jd · · Score: 1

    But how many of them were registered voters or tax payers? You've got to consider the priorities of politicians, in all this.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  40. Disappointing by glasserc · · Score: 1

    To be honest, I find this extremely disappointing. Next time around when nobody at NASA can think of a name, they'll convene some committee of poets and writers, and Slashdot will whine, "What about transparency, accountability, etc.? Why can't we have a direct Internet vote or something?" And NASA will (rightly) say, "We tried that. Sorry, Internet; you're too immature to handle that responsibility."

    Colbert should be ashamed of himself. If some elected official put his name on some NASA component, we'd be relentlessly critical. What ever happened to "Colbert-chan is not your personal army"?

    And frankly I think Serenity is a pretty boring name too, just another paean to pop culture. The Internet had an opportunity here to really demonstrate the value of volunteerism and free collaboration, and instead it told a boob joke.

    1. Re:Disappointing by gardyloo · · Score: 1

      Colbert should be ashamed of himself. If some elected official put his name on some NASA component, we'd be relentlessly critical.

      Fractal irony.

    2. Re:Disappointing by Draek · · Score: 1

      Tell us what name *you* would've picked, then.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
    3. Re:Disappointing by glasserc · · Score: 1

      The other modules are named "Destiny", "Columbus", "Hope", "Star", and "Dawn". This one is meant to house life support functions. I would suggest names like:

      • Snow, after notable epidemiologist John Snow -- also has pleasant overtones of peacefulness, water, precipitation
      • Pneuma, or vital heat, from ancient medical theories about life and health
      • Loam, a kind of soil considered ideal for gardening and agriculture

      I'm sure anyone could do much better if they tried, and I'm even willing to bet some did, but they were shouted down by Colbert, MyYearbook, Socialvibe, etc.

    4. Re:Disappointing by ImOnlySleeping · · Score: 1

      How about, what name did you pick. Because it sounds like none.

      --
      Everybody seems to think I'm lazy I don't mind, I think they're crazy
    5. Re:Disappointing by glasserc · · Score: 1

      Point taken.

    6. Re:Disappointing by Draek · · Score: 1

      First off, a few critiques (or "why would NASA have thought proper to ask on an online poll instead of continuing naming them themselves"):

      Destiny: Pathetically predictable PR move. By that account, the next ones should've been "Freedom" and "Justice", Gundam pun not intended. Epic Fail.
      Columbus: Like Colbert, also a person who didn't contribute a thing to astronomy, physics, or anything remotely related to the matter at hand. Still, it would've been fitting on a satellite meant to explore new places of our solar system but alas, this is not. Fail.
      Hope: see "Destiny".
      Star: Dull. Awfully so. Fail.
      Dawn: See "Star".

      As for your suggestions:

      Snow: An epidemiologist, on a space station module? see "Columbus". The water kind? see "Star".
      Pneuma: Leaving aside its similarity to pneumonia, it's not a bad name. Would've been nice if the primary function of the module would've been heating but it isn't the case, to the best of my knowledge. Not Fail, but I still prefer the two that were picked.
      Loam: See "Star".

      Personally I like both Serenity and Colbert. Colbert, because it displays a sense of humor which is in sore need these days, and Serenity for the same reason, except naming a space ship module after a fictional space ship isn't very creative. Still way, way better than "Destiny" or "Hope" though.

      --
      No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
  41. Rush by JumpDrive · · Score: 1

    To bad Rush didn't get involved.
    I would have loved knowing that the bathroom on the space station was named after Rush Limbaugh.

    Naming it Serenity, really sucks though, because eventually it will burn up.

    But then again they were always fixing Serenity and getting her to fly again.
    The most important thing is that you love her.

    "Hey, what was that?"

  42. A Firefly-class freighter called Tena by tepples · · Score: 1

    naming the new lab after an incontinence pad [Serenity] could

    Isn't that why the incontinence pad changed its name to Tena? Compare the size of "Serenity" on old packaging to that on new packaging.

  43. Racist comment by NiteShaed · · Score: 5, Funny

    I believe the correct term is actually "damaged Cylon" you insensitive frakin' clod.

    --
    Some bring out the best in others, some the worst. Some bring out far more.
    1. Re:Racist comment by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I believe the correct term is actually "damaged Cylon" you insensitive frakin' clod.

      Better throw it into the sun cuz we don't need technology no more. We's gonna make lurv to the big hairless monkeys here, make lots of little waterhead toaster-hybrid childrens! And now you know where neckties came from -- space robots.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  44. Perhaps by jlynd · · Score: 1

    This might be a good way to drum up some press, and (gasp) some support and interest from younger persons. I could think of worse things to happen to a NASA initiative. I say they run with it. Why not?

    --
    Hell is the impossibility of reason...
  45. I gave up on Digg years ago...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The whole idea is nice on paper, like communism. However, most people seem to be rather dumb so things they find interesting are pretty boring.

    1. Re:I gave up on Digg years ago...... by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "older than the internet" and/or "included in my internet welcome package".

  46. Re:Scientology; by MrKaos · · Score: 1

    It really comes off as one seriously deranged organisation.

    Always wondered what Satan looked like.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  47. Wouldn't have mattered by snowwrestler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Xenu ship has sailed. Everyone knows what it is now. For instance Colbert mentions it on his show all the time, and his nightly audience is bigger than the total number of votes in this NASA content.

    The vote had nothing to with harming Scientology--naming it Xenu was just a nerd joke, just like Battletoad or Stephen Colbert or Serenity.

    --
    Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:Wouldn't have mattered by ImpShial · · Score: 1

      Actually, Serenity was one of the NASA-supplied names for the module, not a write-in nerd joke.

      --
      I gave up religion for Lent.
    2. Re:Wouldn't have mattered by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Serenity was one of the NASA-supplied names for the module, not a write-in nerd joke.

      It's probably written-in by NASA nerds.

    3. Re:Wouldn't have mattered by snowwrestler · · Score: 1

      Yes, but one reason it got so many more votes than the other 3 NASA names is the Firefly connection. It was discussed here and on other boards during the voting.

      --
      Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    4. Re:Wouldn't have mattered by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      It's also worth noting that The first two module names were Unity, and Harmony. The name Serenity fits the pattern far better than the other NASA supplied names. For that reason alone, I would have voted for the name Serenity, even if I had never seen (or heard of) Firefly.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  48. In the words of Daffy Duck... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...you're despicable.

    Did you even know there was an addition to the space station before it was on The Colbert Report? I didn't.

    Leave your geek card and slashdot ID at the door.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  49. Too bad by solarcardork · · Score: 1

    I guess this means we don't get an Angry Dome then.

  50. mod parent up by Digitus1337 · · Score: 1

    That would make a -perfect- name. I wouldn't be surprised if they plan to mention it on the show.

  51. Stephen should change his name to Serenity by GayBliss · · Score: 1

    NASA should agree to the name if Stephen Colbert changes his name to Serenity.

  52. Mary Cate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Colbert is the best thing that ever happened to NASA. Come on. They are on the verge of extinction funding-wise, since having trouble keeping things in the air.

    They should maximize the exposure, including sending Steven into space to air a show episode. Say, that would be an interesting challenge for NASA to call his bluff. But he would probably take it.

    Anyway, Colbert is the most brilliant comedic, marketing, and news mind this century. Gold standard for all comedy news to come.

  53. Charlene by theJML · · Score: 2, Funny

    Colbert's gonna have to redo his song/DLC for Rockband "Charlene (I'm right behind you)" to add in "...I think of you when I'm watchin' you from the ISS far above you..."

    --
    -=JML=-
    1. Re:Charlene by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      You don't know that for sure. Maybe the "Colbert" module will be a blimp.

  54. Re:Uncritical media breaks democracy by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

    Well, 4500 or so US troops probably included a lot of registered voters. Whether they're taxpayers or federal debits is another issue.

  55. Re:Colbert wee wees on space program supporters by devjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's one way to look at it.

    On the other hand, I think it's an example of how quickly a large group of people can be mobilized when prompted by someone they like. It seems obvious you've not spent much time watching his program.

    Colbert, Stewart, and others prove that serious discussion can happen while laughing. I don't think for one second that Stephen was mocking NASA; he actually saved it from the prior leading write-in: Xenu.

  56. Poll was weighted to begin with by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It was obvious NASA wanted Serenity when you looked at all of the subpar default options and the similarity in the name Serenity with the names of other modules. What they DIDN'T count on was the raw might of the Colbert Nation (of which I am one)!

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  57. I for one... by icedcool · · Score: 1

    Welcome our new Galactic Overlord Colbert.

    First it was a bridge and now a space station.

    --
    Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
    1. Re:I for one... by szo · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the Hungarian authorities overridden the poll result :(
      Unimaginative, coward bastards.

      --
      Red Leader Standing By!
  58. Re:Scientology and Scientologists... by Schemat1c · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...are the people behind nearly all that is evil in the world!

    Ah come on not all evil, leave some room for bankers and republicans!

    --

    "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
  59. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Brown-pants by aqk · · Score: 0

    || for a date with Inara Serra / Morena Baccarin?

    Mmm.. don't know who THEY are; I just wanna marry Kirstie Allie! OK then; just a "date".

  60. NASA naming history by xPsi · · Score: 1

    NASA has a long history of naming missions and modules after rather arbitrary, but dignified sounding, things. For example, the arts (Apollo Theater, Orson Welles' Mercury theater company, etc.) as well as pseudo-scientific things like signs of the zodiac and crypto-geographic places and cryptozoological creatures. Not to mention South American countries featured in drug-oriented movies, science fiction space ships, and even abstract contestants on a game show. "Colbert" seems pretty consistent with this non sequitur trend.

    --
    i\hbar\dot{\psi}=\hat{H}\psi
  61. Re:Colbert trumps Scientology; toasters wins. by aqk · · Score: 0

    This is your toaster talking:

    All your science is belong to US!

    In Soviet science, toasters consult YOU!
    .

  62. Yes, a Mistake by DesScorp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mistake? How so? It's pretty obvious that the purpose of the naming-competition was to get people involved and excited.

    Howard Stern could get legions of his fans excited about the project too. I still wouldn't want a station module named after him.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Yes, a Mistake by brkello · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But Colbert != Stern. It's like saying you don't want something named Gandhi because you don't want it named Hitler.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
  63. Colbert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    colbert.... serinity... almost the same word.

  64. Scientology, Anonymous, Colbert, and Xenu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it seems that Stephen Colbert has a bit of a fancy with Scientology and their uber-seekrit Xenu. See, many would say that Scientology is a dangerous cult. There are many, many stories of personal ruin at the hand of Scientology. If even a small percentage of what is alleged is true, Scientology deserves international attention.

    Whether or not you agree with 4chan/Anonymous's global protesting of Scientology, the truth is that it's worked. Celebrities like Stephen Colbert now bring attention to Scientology. The issues surrounding Scientology are common knowledge, and Scientology will have to either come to terms with its now-public secrecy, or continue to suffer in the public view. Xenu is now almost a house-hold name, and I have no doubt that it was 4chan/Anonymous who was behind the Xenu write-in in the first place.

    It's been interesting to watch, from the first global protest onward. Go Anonymous!

  65. I like Stephen but.. by jamessnell · · Score: 1

    I really like Stephen Colbert, but I've got to say, this is a pretty lame situation. I hope NASA runs with the runner up.

  66. Re:Scientology and Scientologists... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chef, is that you?

  67. The Internet is a boob joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I for one welcome our new boob overlords, with both hands.

  68. Will NASA paint a red band around it? by actionbastard · · Score: 1

    With the word 'Wriststrong' on it?

    --
    Sig this!
  69. I have a sense of humour so I'll relply to a Troll by unlametheweak · · Score: 1

    That's pretty much a Troll question. You should obviously be asking the people who would have developed the stuff. But because you are a NASA Fanboy who is playing the role of the ignorant fool, then I really don't see the point in answering. Riddle me this Troll-boy; how did the Pyramids get built if NASA wasn't around to build them?

    I'm obviously out of my league here, as I am in the Mac discussion areas.
    (I'll lay my head on the alter for replying to a Troll, and wait for the Moderation to commence).

  70. Thank you by bobobobo · · Score: 1

    For pointing out the obvious. Like those 4chan kiddies who think it's cool to rickroll.

    1. Re:Thank you by psergiu · · Score: 1

      Not according to this study.

      ;-)

      --
      1% APY, No fees, Online Bank https://captl1.co/2uIErYq Don't let your $$$ sit in a no-interest acct.
  71. Re:Colbert wee wees on space program supporters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, maybe this is what slashdot needs to get us all organized - a single, leader of some kind with which we can all follow blindly...

    hmmm

    Bruce Campbell?

  72. Other Possible Naming Opportunities by justanyone · · Score: 1

    Next thing you know, more parts will be up for naming. Suggestions:

    Others?

    1. Re:Other Possible Naming Opportunities by Genom · · Score: 1
  73. Re:So Colbert Nation greater than the Brown-pants by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

    || for a date with Inara Serra / Morena Baccarin? Mmm.. don't know who THEY are; I just wanna marry Kirstie Allie! OK then; just a "date".

    Oh no you don't: http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Entertainment/Images/kirstie-alley-skinny-and-fat.jpg .

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
  74. it would be a mistake for NASA to reneg by viridari · · Score: 1

    This could be a real public relations boost for NASA if they went with the Colbert name. NASA would earn the good will of many tax paying Americans and get the occasional positive plug from Stephen on the show. NASA often has to fight against politicians for funding, but Colbert brings to bear an army of letter writers who will help secure funding to make sure his ISS module gets launched.

    Most of the public feels completely disconnected from NASA and this could really help to change that. I hope they take the Colbert plug and run with it!

  75. This man is the American Dream by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

    I mean he took the CRAPPIEST TIME SLOT on just about every channel and turned it into gold. I can't even begin to think about how many failed shows I saw filter through that 11:30 to midnight time slot on Comedy Central where most viewers switch to one of the usuals (Letterman or Leno).

    And realistically I think Serenity drew so many numbers only because of the geek crowd and their obsession with Firefly. Had I known about the contest, I might have gone and voted for that.

  76. Consolation Prize by stinkydog · · Score: 1

    Serenity is the best name for the module, but Colbert still deserves something. I propose:

    The Stephen Colbert BioWaste Recycling Module

    Both are cranky, only work for a half hour at a time, and run on waste products. A perfect match.

    SD

    --
    âoeWho knew something as harmless as willful ignorance could end up having real consequences?â
    1. Re:Consolation Prize by GameMaster · · Score: 1

      I do think it would be funny and the perfect way for NASA to reverse the joke back on Colbert. I do take issue with the "only work for half hour at a time" bit (assuming it was a serious jab). I'm sure each show take an immense amount of time and effort to put together and he does one a night.

      --

      Rules of Conduct:
      #1 - The DM is always right.
      #2 - If the DM is wrong, see rule #1
  77. Re:Scientology and Scientologists... by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...are all a bunch of child molestors and rapists (in my opinion). It is my belief, that Scientologists have gay sex with children on a daily basis and are the people behind nearly all that is evil in the world!

    As a Jew, I take offense to the notion that anyone can supplant my people as the #1 target of paranoid conspiracy theories! Even the Time Cube guy targets us, and I won't let you ruin that.

  78. Colbert? by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

    For doing this, I hope he gets hit by a bus and dies.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
  79. Xenu 3:16 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing to see here... move along...

  80. Re:Colbert wee wees on space program supporters by Dirk+Ruffly · · Score: 0

    I don't have a problem with mocking the space program or NASA. There's plenty of good that can be done with a few good laughs. And, for the record, I have watched and enjoyed nearly every one of Colbert's shows.

    The people who lost were the space program supporters who took the vote seriously and were made instantly irrelevant by Colbert's horde.

    But you are right. A large group of people with no knowledge of and no opinion on a subject can be mobilized in a moment to take control of an issue. Fascinating, but scary in my opinion.

  81. He has a wife, you know. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Her name is Incontentia... Incontentia Buttus...

  82. Colbert Acronym by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nasa will probably not name it Colbert and instead go with "Serenity" to mesh with Harmony and Unity.

    It would be good if they indicated that "Serenity" was delivered/supported/connected by the "Co-Orbitial Longitudinal Binary Exponential Rapid Truss" (COLBERT) or some other nonsensical acronym.

  83. Link to story about Xenu by cdpage · · Score: 1

    So your saying i shouldn't post this link here?

    http://www.mystae.com/streams/gnosis/otiii.html

  84. Ahem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The airport to nowhere!

    You misspelled "from".

  85. Colbert Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know why he did it, but I still hate his guts for showing this kind of disrespect for science, and for getting his trashy mouth-breathing fans to weigh in on a SPACE STATION MODULE, something they would not otherwise care about. Please maintain six inches of separation at all times between science and Colbert's fan demographic!

    I'll never watch Colbert's show now, or fail to trash him most harshly should his name come up in conversation.

    1. Re:Colbert Down by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, the whole sarcasm is part of the act. Its a bit of a running gag now for him to run around and try and get things named after him.

      --
      09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
      +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused
  86. Rule #4 of the naming contest: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA will take into consideration the results of the voting. However, the results are not binding on NASA and NASA reserves the right to ultimately select a name in accordance with the best interests of the agency, its needs, and other considerations. Such name may not necessarily be one which is on the list of voted-on candidate names. NASAâ(TM)s decision shall be deemed final.

  87. If it is considered a federal government bulding.. by Roadkills-R-Us · · Score: 1

    ... I don't think it can be named after a living person. Now if Mr. Colbert went into space and re-entered in just his skivvies with no braking, the name could be used. I suspect he's not up for that.

  88. Come on, Serenity? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29863574/
    "Come on, Serenity?" Colbert said on his March 10 show. "That's not a space module, that's a Glade plug-in."

    hatemail in 3....2....1....

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  89. Re:Colbert wee wees on space program supporters by dprovine · · Score: 1

    I don't think for one second that Stephen was mocking NASA; he actually saved it from the prior leading write-in: Xenu.

    But if I read The Fantastic Article correctly, "Serenity" finished in 2nd place, and so Xenu was never in the lead.

  90. Re:Colbert wee wees on space program supporters by devjj · · Score: 1

    Dirk, I introduce you to the American public. 300M people, most of whom have many, many opinions on subjects of which they possess little or no knowledge. I'm not saying that's a good nothing, but it's worth noting.

    Neither "knowledge" nor prior opinion were a prerequisite for voting on that poll. It was open to anyone who cared to vote, which includes Colbert's viewers.

    One would think NASA would be happy for the publicity. How often would you say the average Colbert viewer thinks of them at all? While it may not be what they had in mind, Colbert's mention of the ISS is good for NASA, especially in light of what the Obama administration may do to their budget. He also pointed out that it is NASA's final call. They wouldn't be breaking the rules to go with one of their official options. While you can be certain Colbert would call them on it, NASA is the final arbiter of the relevance of any single vote.

  91. Re:Colbert wee wees on space program supporters by devjj · · Score: 1

    "...prior leading write-in..." (emphasis added)

  92. Re:Colbert wee wees on space program supporters by Tuoqui · · Score: 1

    I vote we make NYCL our fearless leader.

    --
    09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    +2 Troll is Slashdot's way of saying groupthink is confused