Slashdot Mirror


Ridley Scott Directing Alien Prequel

brumgrunt writes "After three decades of speculation, original Alien director Ridley Scott has signed on to the new Fox sequel. 'Nothing is known about the set-up of the new movie, except that chronologically it precedes the plight of the Nostromo. Since it's obviously going to involve the human race [...] Writer Jon Spaihts successfully pitched to Fox and Scott Free Productions, and is working on the script.'"

336 comments

  1. oblig. by somecreepyoldguy · · Score: 3, Funny

    they mostly come at night... mostly

    1. Re:oblig. by atramentum · · Score: 0

      A day in the Corps is like a day on the farm. Every meal a banquet! Every paycheck a fortune! Every formation a parade! I LOVE the Corps!

    2. Re:oblig. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Aliens with armor skin and acid blood are afraid of a little daylight? Lame.
      No wonder predator kicks their ass.

    3. Re:oblig. by sarahbau · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't only come at night. They mostly come at night...mostly.

    4. Re:oblig. by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      It's a pity that they don't come out at night and tear Ridley Scott in twain.

      I respect what he did in Alien, but his recent works are the biggest loads of shite around. I wish he'd left the Alien series well enough alone.

      I'll hazard a guess that the movie will be yet another ad for America's army. There will be strategic deaths to ensure that the soldiers want revenge, but all in all they'll survive because they're so fucking good.

      Ridley Scott, please, please, please... stop.

    5. Re:oblig. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Will they be as awful as Enterprise? Or any other lame assed dumbwitted diseased prequel?

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    6. Re:oblig. by mfnickster · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a pity that they don't come out at night and tear Ridley Scott in twain.
      ...
      I respect what he did in Alien, but his recent works are the biggest loads of shite around. I wish he'd left the Alien series well enough alone.

      You're kidding, right? You do know that after the first film, Ridley had nothing to do with the Alien series?

      I'll hazard a guess that the movie will be yet another ad for America's army. There will be strategic deaths to ensure that the soldiers want revenge, but all in all they'll survive because they're so fucking good.

      Um... are you referring to Black Hawk Down, in which the people who died/survived in the film are the ones who died/survived in real life?

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    7. re:oblig. by ed.han · · Score: 1

      while i hate ENT too, how in the world is it possible that a slashdotter--any slashdotter--hears "prequel" and doesn't immediately think of the horror of jar-jar binks?!

    8. Re:oblig. by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      There is that as a disgusting example but I've hated prequels for as long as I recall. I especially hate novel prequels but TV series and movie ones are just as much an abomination.

      I'm not sure what you call 'em but there's been 'galactica 80' and such vomitous disrespectful tripe as 'Walking Tall the series" without the zombie sheriff or at least an explaination at the resurrection. ;) Maybe call 'em posticles?

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    9. Re:oblig. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The mind protects itself from excessive pain by blacking out those memories.

      Until now you bastard!

  2. Swell... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    At least I had a few years without Xenomorphs showing up in my nightmare.

    (IIRC, the nightmares involved having a pulse rifle that ran out of ammo.)

    1. Re:Swell... by schon · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least I had a few years without Xenomorphs showing up in my nightmare.

      (IIRC, the nightmares involved having a pulse rifle that ran out of ammo.)

      Funny, I would have thought the most recent ones would have involved Jean-Pierre Jeunet directing another movie. :)

    2. Re:Swell... by Onaga · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Well I, for one, welcome-- blah, this one's too easy.

    3. Re:Swell... by nametaken · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's silly... we all know nuking them from orbit is the only way to be sure.

    4. Re:Swell... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      At least I had a few years without Xenomorphs showing up in my nightmare.

      (IIRC, the nightmares involved having a pulse rifle that ran out of ammo.)

      Funny, I would have thought the most recent ones would have involved Jean-Pierre Jeunet directing another movie. :)

      Why do you think my clip was empty???

    5. Re:Swell... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      That's silly... we all know nuking them from orbit is the only way to be sure.

      Heh... in the small number of my nightmares involving nukes, they were never part of the solution.

    6. Re:Swell... by Nos. · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've been prepping my sons (3.5 years and 7 months) for their first viewing of Alien/Aliens since birth by grabbing their entire face with my hand. They think its funny... at least for now.

    7. Re:Swell... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Funny

      I've been prepping my sons (3.5 years and 7 months) for their first viewing of Alien/Aliens since birth by grabbing their entire face with my hand. They think its funny... at least for now.

      I hope you're done having kids. Because if you ever explain that that the baby will come out of mommy's belly...

    8. Re:Swell... by maxume · · Score: 1

      You make my dreams seem so...boring.

      I barely ever remember a dream, and about 2 have rated as 'mildly disturbing'.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Swell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here I thought I was the only one who was pulling that BS!

      My son and daughter (2 and 5) both think it's a standard part of tickling to get facehugged.

    10. Re:Swell... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Heh. I've been doing the same thing with my daughter (8 yrs old). She just thinks face suckers are so funny...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    11. Re:Swell... by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      They key to wild dreams is to wake up a couple hours before you have to get up and then go back to sleep. Those are always my most vivid and memorable dreams. I've had entire conversations with people and felt they were real until I fully wake up.

    12. Re:Swell... by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hope you're done having kids. Because if you ever explain that that the baby will come out of mommy's belly...

      Shit, my sister and I were both c-sections and the scar was ginormous. Being a Christian household, we weren't told that much about the birds and the bees but I did happen to see Alien one night when trying to catch a rerun of Fraggle Rock on HBO late at night and put two and two together... Gave me creepy visions of my little baby sister bursting out of the tummy, all blood and gnashing teeth.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    13. Re:Swell... by cawpin · · Score: 1

      Well, I'd be more worried about your magazine being empty. Forget your cell phone.

    14. Re:Swell... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Amélie" rocked!

      "Alien Erection" did not.

    15. Re:Swell... by Mandelbrot-5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've been prepping my sons (3.5 years and 7 months) for their first viewing of Alien/Aliens since birth by grabbing their entire face with my hand. They think its funny... at least for now.

      This reminds me of when my parents took me to see Alien when I was 5. Good time had by all due to a weeks worth of sleep deprivation.

      --
      Math is like sex. People who get it are popular in class, people who don't are not.
    16. Re:Swell... by maxume · · Score: 1

      I've experienced that, but even then they are fleeting, and usually rather mundane (the guy above mentions both battles with aliens and nuclear weapons...).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    17. Re:Swell... by hudsucker · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Alien is the scariest movie I've ever seen, hands down.

      When I saw it in the theater, there were scenes where I could not watch it -- I had to cover my eyes. Even when it was on TV, I still did that years later. (Specifically, the scene where Dallas is crawling through the ducts and the alien attacks.)

      What made Alien so different from previous monster movies is the alien was so fast. Before Alien filmakers thought it heightened the suspense to show the monster slowly approaching the victims. Ridley Scott realized that if the alien moves quickly, the danger is increased because you are never safe; it can get you at any time.

      That's not the only groundbreaking part of the movie. (Spoiler alert!)

      Remember when Ripley set the Nostromo to self destruct, but then the alien is blocking her path to the escape pod, so she goes back to cancel the self destruct. How many times have we seen this before? It is such a cliche. So it was astounding when the timer ran down and she could not stop it! I've never seen that before. And I can't think of many movies that have done that since.

    18. Re:Swell... by ppanon · · Score: 1

      When I first did that to my son, he was pretty upset. The effect was augmented because I had my hand "skitter" on its fingers across the couch and his body while making its way to his face. Sort of like Thing in The Munsters.

      When I tried it again recently he thought it was funny.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    19. Re:Swell... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ask your doctor for some sort of drug that works in the brain. They often stimulate remembering dreams. Antidepressants sometimes work. Old beta blockers (a type of blood pressure medication) are pretty good as well.

      Better living through chemistry.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    20. Re:Swell... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I have seen it happen and from the doctors POV it was more like go away I am perfectly comfortable here.

    21. Re:Swell... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I've experienced the same sort of thing, with the happy side effect that time seems to go by a lot less quickly when I'm dreaming in the early morning shortly before having to get up. I'll wake up, look at the time and see I have an hour or so left before I have to get up, then will have a ridiculously vivid dream that seems to span hours, and when I wake up again I find that only 10-15 minutes or so has passed. I guess I have a pretty snappy REM cycle during that time, and I guess I can appreciate how Picard felt in "The Inner Light".

      My dreams during that period are usually quite vivid and interesting, with some of them making enough of an impression such that I can remember them literally years later. On the flip side, the occasional nightmare during that same period is equally intense and sometimes will leave me shaken for hours afterwards.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    22. Re:Swell... by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

      Dude, You are one sick bastard...
      ...and you made me laugh, hard. It's probably well that I never had kids. Yours are in for a rough stretch.
      Please post the videos to YouTube.

    23. Re:Swell... by dwywit · · Score: 1
      Y'know, sometimes I wish there was an "awesome" rating - "funny" doesn't do justice to some comments.

      My son (11.5) - reckons he's ready to watch Alien - but I'm not going to let him until we have a big screen and 5.1 sound - and Mummy and little sister (almost 8) are away for the weekend.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    24. Re:Swell... by dwywit · · Score: 1
      Testify, brother! It's the ONLY horror movie that ever made me jump.

      Right when the facehugger jumps out of the pod onto John Hurt's facemask.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  3. Who cares about the humans by stox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I want the story of the ship the Nostromo found.

    --
    "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    1. Re:Who cares about the humans by TinBromide · · Score: 3, Informative

      aliens attack, everybody dies.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    2. Re:Who cares about the humans by josteos · · Score: 1

      Yes. I want that too. Very much. DO EEEEET!!!!

      --
      Save the Music; Save the World at http://www.TuneTriever.com (Our latest Android game)
    3. Re:Who cares about the humans by Scragglykat · · Score: 3, Funny

      I heard they were going to do that, but they couldn't get Rosanne Barr to play the lead roll.

    4. Re:Who cares about the humans by thedonger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The real question is can they make a decent movie without trying way, way too hard to link it to characters in the prior sequels? I'll burn the theater down if "young Ripley" is somehow involved (though it may be worth the speculation as to how much botox it took to get Sigourney Weaver's skin 1979-tight).

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    5. Re:Who cares about the humans by Jeng · · Score: 1

      I'm wondering how there can be a prequel that does not tell the story of the ship the Nostromo found?

      btw, regarding your sig. As an owner of a black cat I have found that the easiest way to find one in the dark is to look for the blackest spot of black in the blackness.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    6. Re:Who cares about the humans by Killer+Orca · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I heard they were going to do that, but they couldn't get Rosanne Barr to play the lead roll.

      Modded Flamebait huh? Guess there is a loyal following of Rosanne fans on Slashdot, who knew?

    7. Re:Who cares about the humans by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Nostromo was diverted to the planet where they found the Xenomorph because someone in the company knew it was there. How they knew has not been explained in the films, to date. Presumably there was some prior contact that was covered up. The AvP series showed how the company could know that the aliens existed, but no reason to know where they could be found.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Who cares about the humans by Dr_Snugglebunny · · Score: 1
    9. Re:Who cares about the humans by JasonBee · · Score: 3, Funny

      if it was a vision should you not have jabbed out your visual cortex instead?

    10. Re:Who cares about the humans by just_another_sean · · Score: 1

      They are everywhere.

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
    11. Re:Who cares about the humans by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I want the story of the ship the Nostromo found.

      There is a few Darkhorse comics that touch on this and actually I was wondering if they predate aliens.

      Basically, humans get stranded on a planet full of Xenomorphs and at the last moment when they are surrounded by a sea of Aliens, one of the pilots show up with this gun that basically vaporizes all of of the Xenomorphs.

      They try to thank the pilot but being the emotionless being that it is, it just floated by to the ship without saying a word.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    12. Re:Who cares about the humans by FreekyGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

      As the owner of a couple cats, I can say that the easiest way to find any cat in the dark is to simply walk around until they run in front of you, and you either step on them or trip on them.

    13. Re:Who cares about the humans by fullgandoo · · Score: 1

      Wasn't it a beacon from the alien ship that made "mother" redirect Nostromo to that planet? Only later did mother analyze that it was a warning beacon.

      If the company had known about it, they would have sent a specialized team there instead of diverting a freighter.

    14. Re:Who cares about the humans by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

      And what exactly crewed the original ship? I thought, after the AvP movies, that the original ship was the Predator ship that had the bizarro Alien/Predator hybrid. That would kind of make sense, but I would think that the Predators cohorts would have hunted it down and killed off the critters in that ship.

    15. Re:Who cares about the humans by Evildonald · · Score: 2, Informative

      AvP? That rubbish series doesn't even count as part of the real Alien series.

    16. Re:Who cares about the humans by FourthAge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This.

      In the Alien franchise, only one character matters. It is big, black and has acid for blood.

      There is no need to look for a way to bring Ripley into it, especially if it involves time travel, memory loss, or cloning again.

      --
      The tao of democracy: the government you can vote for is not the real government.
    17. Re:Who cares about the humans by unfasten · · Score: 1

      And what exactly crewed the original ship?

      Space Jockeys. A film about them would be awesome.

    18. Re:Who cares about the humans by thedonger · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you have seen any movies from the Alien franchise, but they found a way to get Ripley into everything but the "versus" movies. They'll find a way to get her in the prequel. Just look for George Lucas' name to be involved somehow and you'll know they're trying.

      --
      Help fight poverty: Punch a poor person.
    19. Re:Who cares about the humans by vux984 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Nostromo was diverted to the planet where they found the Xenomorph because someone in the company knew it was there. How they knew has not been explained in the films, to date. Presumably there was some prior contact that was covered up. The AvP series showed how the company could know that the aliens existed, but no reason to know where they could be found.

      There are few options:

      One: the company didn't know about the alien beacon in advance, and the whole android with recovery orders and crew expendable stuff was just standing standard procedure, in case they got lucky. Its plausible I think, but means there can be no prequel.

      Two: The company knew the aliens existed by previously merely detecting/analyzing the beacon, then they might divert the Nostromo with the intention of picking whatever they find up. It would make sense, even to the subterfuge of planting Ash with extra orders to recover it, and diverting the ship so it picks up the beacon forcing the crew to respond (per their contract to respond to distress calls) allowing the company to get a 'free expedition' out the crew.

      That all works, but would make a boring prequel movie. Some remote station or passing ship detect an alien beacon, and don't investigate it.

      Three: The company knew the aliens existed, previously investigated, and had already lost an expedition trying to recover it, perhaps they got some reports and know something about the aliens, perhaps they got nothing at all... the expedition just vanished without a trace. Either way it doesn't follow that they'd divert a fully loaded and ridiculously expensive refinery ship to the planet for a 2nd attempt.

      That would be like Spain deliberately diverting a fully loaded treasure ship to investigate a new island where a previous expedition had already been lost. I just don't see it happening. The Nostromo was ridiculously valuable; they might gamble it on it on an expedition where no real exceptional risks could be assessed, but it just doesn't make sense to gamble an expensive treasure ship, with an unqualified crew -- if they already knew that they'd lost an expedition.

    20. Re:Who cares about the humans by still+cynical · · Score: 1

      I don't remember if it was covered in the original movie or not, but it was (IIRC) covered in the book. The "distress signal" that the Nostromo picked up had been discovered by the company and found to actually be a warning. Ripley realized it was really a warning to stay away, and that's when Ash tried to kill her to cover up what the company was trying to do.

      --
      Ignorance is the root of all evil.
    21. Re:Who cares about the humans by xerxesVII · · Score: 1

      Amen. This ridiculous need to force Ripley into every story has got to stop.

      --
      "We shall grapple with the ineffable, and see if we may not eff it after all." - Douglas Adams
    22. Re:Who cares about the humans by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      The Nostromo was diverted to the planet where they found the Xenomorph because someone in the company knew it was there. How they knew has not been explained in the films, to date. Presumably there was some prior contact that was covered up. The AvP series showed how the company could know that the aliens existed, but no reason to know where they could be found.

      Funny reference: Nostromo is a book by Joseph Conrad and Sulaco was the mining town it took place in.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nostromo

      The Colonial Marines Tech Manual explained things pretty thoroughly. As I recall, they had a whole section in the back where company execs and scientists tried to piece together just what the hell happened. They had the initial info from the Nostromo encounter and then later retrieved data from the Sulaco disaster. That the Nostromo was sent there deliberately was established in the first movie. How did they know? I think the non-canon Manual stated that a French flyby probe detected the alien transmission from the planet. Ash had orders to bring the alien back to Earth with the crew being expendable. Did all ships operate with a secret android or was Ash a plant specifically for this purpose? Had other alien ships been encountered so they knew what to expect? Unknown. But the fun part of the whole Tech Manual bull session was how the scientists were reasonably discounting what Ripley said she experienced because it wasn't possible. "How could a creature grow from a worm capable of living in someone's chest to two meters fall? No, the creature she encountered should be no larger than a medium dog."

      While there are plenty of good stories that could be told in the Aliens setting, most of them sucked and this movie will suck, too. The best Aliens stuff I read were the original Dark Horse sequel to Aliens with Newt and Marine guy on Earth having survived the escape and Ripley in places unknown and the original AVP comic. The Aliens sequel was great because it really ramped things up to the next level. Stupid scientists bring the aliens to Earth, are so arrogant they think they can control it, and all goes to hell. The Earth is overrun. And the AVP comic was just such a tight little story, would have translated to the screen perfectly.

      Naw, this is gonna suck.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    23. Re:Who cares about the humans by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Informative

      What you say is true, but I don't know how informative it is. You've definitely got some captain obvious points going on here.

    24. Re:Who cares about the humans by Gospodin · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is big, black and has acid for blood.

      Dude! How can we get Samuel L. Jackson involved? ("I am so m-f'ing sick of these m-f'ing aliens on this m-f'ing spaceship!")

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
    25. Re:Who cares about the humans by mrzaph0d · · Score: 2, Funny

      in the original Ripley shot first.

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    26. Re:Who cares about the humans by jeffshoaf · · Score: 1

      We need to nuke them from orbit...

      --
      Putting the "anal" back into "analyst"...
    27. Re:Who cares about the humans by FourthAge · · Score: 1

      I have, and while her reappearance in Aliens is quite sensible, her other appearances vary from "contrived" to "retarded".

      --
      The tao of democracy: the government you can vote for is not the real government.
    28. Re:Who cares about the humans by FourthAge · · Score: 0

      Nobody knows what Samuel L. Jackson's blood is made from, because he never bleeds.

      --
      The tao of democracy: the government you can vote for is not the real government.
    29. Re:Who cares about the humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some books developed the race of the "Space Jockey", which created both Predators and Aliens (or something similar, I heard about it in a random fansite). One of the specimens of this race can be seen on the first film, where the crew finds some kind of defense turret, with an alien dead inside.

      In the Alien series, this race crewed the ship found by the Nostromo spaceship. Sadly, this wasn't explored on the sequels, which were more about guns, gore and special effects than about actually scarying people.

    30. Re:Who cares about the humans by Fozzyuw · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks you just ruined that movie for me, whenever it's made.

      --
      "The past was erased, the erasure was forgotten, the lie became truth." ~1984 George Orwell
    31. Re:Who cares about the humans by the+donner+party · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the increasingly contrived ways of explaining Ripley's appearances aren't somehow connected to Ripley's believe it or not...

    32. Re:Who cares about the humans by 93,000 · · Score: 1

      And if you're ever stranded alone in the remote wilderness, bury a length of cable in the ground. Before long some jackass with a backhoe will inevitable come and dig it up. Ride home with him.

    33. Re:Who cares about the humans by sukotto · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you. But I prefer to pretend that AvP never happened.

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    34. Re:Who cares about the humans by sootman · · Score: 1

      When Aliens Attack... of course it's from Fox!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    35. Re:Who cares about the humans by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Midiclorians?

    36. Re:Who cares about the humans by Animaether · · Score: 2, Insightful

      completely off-topic - but if they could make her look rather appealing in Galaxy Quest (1999, 20 year after the first Alien movie), then I'm sure they shouldn't have any problems now - a mere 10 years later.

      This is hollywood, people. Push comes to shove, they scan her face, digitally de-age it, and slap it on a stand-in actor.

      That said - I do second the hope that they will not be trying to tie into characters of the 'future' movies; how would they have known about those characters?
      Tying into the existing storyline, however, would actually be rather nice.. though getting away with that without opening up giant plot issues in the 'later' movies seems rather tough.

    37. Re:Who cares about the humans by Scragglykat · · Score: 1

      It is the only way to be sure.

    38. Re:Who cares about the humans by calzakk · · Score: 1

      I want the story of the ship the Nostromo found.

      I don't, and I'm sure a lot of others don't too. What's wrong with a little mystery these days?!

    39. Re:Who cares about the humans by Thaelon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Except everything but for the eggs in stasis. How did that happen?

      --

      Question everything

    40. Re:Who cares about the humans by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      That would be like Spain deliberately diverting a fully loaded treasure ship to investigate a new island where a previous expedition had already been lost. I just don't see it happening. The Nostromo was ridiculously valuable; they might gamble it on it on an expedition where no real exceptional risks could be assessed, but it just doesn't make sense to gamble an expensive treasure ship, with an unqualified crew -- if they already knew that they'd lost an expedition.

      Don't forget this is the company whose primary function is weapons research. Think of it as Spain diverting a ship carrying a full load of valuable timber to an island where a previous expedition saw huge piles of gold coins and managed to get a message into a bottle just before being slaughtered by the natives. The Nostromo's cargo was valuable, but if there was any chance of a super bio-weapon, it was expendable. The whole inquiry at the beginning of Aliens was not to blame Ripley, but to get attention away from the Company's actions.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    41. Re:Who cares about the humans by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      That would be like Spain deliberately diverting a fully loaded treasure ship to investigate a new island where a previous expedition had already been lost. I just don't see it happening. The Nostromo was ridiculously valuable; they might gamble it on it on an expedition where no real exceptional risks could be assessed, but it just doesn't make sense to gamble an expensive treasure ship, with an unqualified crew -- if they already knew that they'd lost an expedition.

      They wouldn't really be risking the refinery ship. Ash could make his way back to the ship after the human crew members had been slaughtered and return to Earth with the results. The company would probably not have counted on him being broken apart by the rest of the crew.

    42. Re:Who cares about the humans by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      But the company lives on and prospers.

    43. Re:Who cares about the humans by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      One: the company didn't know about the alien beacon in advance, and the whole android with recovery orders and crew expendable stuff was just standing standard procedure, in case they got lucky. Its plausible I think, but means there can be no prequel.

      That was the cover story that Ripley and the others were told, "standard operating procedure", but Ash was part of the crew specifically for this purpose, being (theoretically) immune to bio-weapons. IIRC he says as much in the movie when his head is detached; he also has some sense of how dangerous the aliens are.

      Two: The company knew the aliens existed by previously merely detecting/analyzing the beacon, then they might divert the Nostromo with the intention of picking whatever they find up. It would make sense, even to the subterfuge of planting Ash with extra orders to recover it, and diverting the ship so it picks up the beacon forcing the crew to respond (per their contract to respond to distress calls) allowing the company to get a 'free expedition' out the crew.

      This seems most likely to me.

      Three: The company knew the aliens existed, previously investigated, and had already lost an expedition trying to recover it, perhaps they got some reports and know something about the aliens, perhaps they got nothing at all... the expedition just vanished without a trace. Either way it doesn't follow that they'd divert a fully loaded and ridiculously expensive refinery ship to the planet for a 2nd attempt.

      It seems extremely unlikely that the Nostromo could possibly land and survey the area without seeing any sign whatsoever of the previous ship/expedition. Aliens are mean bastards, but they can't vaporize spaceships.

    44. Re:Who cares about the humans by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      In the Alien franchise, only one character matters. It is big, black and has acid for blood.

      Michael Clarke Duncan has acid for blood?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    45. Re:Who cares about the humans by Simulant · · Score: 1

      Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't the ship that Nostromo found an 'other' alien ship... a second alien race that also succumbed to the same aliens that massacred the humans in the other three movies? Perhaps there was prior human contact with this other race. Perhaps, even, there were humans or human androids on that ship. There's a whole slew of possibilities, though my vote is for non-human protagonists.

    46. Re:Who cares about the humans by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ripley: Did you ever ship out with Ash before?
      Dallas: I went out five times with another Science Officer. They replaced him two days before we left Thedus with Ash. Hm?
      Ripley: I don't trust him.
      Dallas: I don't trust anybody.

      It seems pretty clear that Ash and the orders to pick up the xenomorph were specific and deliberate. Mother had Ash's orders. It can be assumed Mother was programmed to treat the signal as a distress call and wake the crew.

      If we assume locations in the movie correspond to the same named locations in reality, dialogue indicates FTL travel is possible, but that the distances involved are still isolating in terms of communication. Long-range FTL communication may not exist, at least for a long-haul tug like the Nostromo, and it may not be feasible to send a "message in an FTL bottle"--engines might not scale down (the Narcissus didn't seem capable).

      I prefer to think that they were relativistic but not yet FTL. The societal implications are just so more interesting that way: long-haul truckers dealing with future shock on each round trip and just plain outliving generations of their relatives left behind learn to not form long ties and care only about themselves. Only crews sticking together over multiple hauls may get close knit. Not even the events in Aliens require FTL travel, but the events in Alien^3 seem to require both FTL communication and travel. And, well, anyone doing lots of space travel at relativistic speeds is going to miss a lot of history and technological advancement. I'd hate to see FTL be required in a prequel.

      I think some Company employee at Thedus who was up on Company history was going through ship communication logs, saw the warning and recognized the life-cycle described therein as matching records from AVP-era and, seeking promotion, changed the crew assignments of the Nostromo and reprogrammed Mother to retrieve the alien and deliver it to his bosses back at Earth. His career either ended or he covered it up when word got back that the Nostromo was lost.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    47. Re:Who cares about the humans by mike260 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      - A Company ship runs into xenomorphs in similar circumstances to Alien or Aliens
        - 90 minutes of panicky firefights in badly-lit environments
        - The survivors take off and nuke the planet from orbit (this being the only way to be sure)
        - The Company covers it all up
        - Ominous ending ties events to the derelict ship on LV-426
        - Roll credits

    48. Re:Who cares about the humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be like Spain deliberately diverting a fully loaded treasure ship to investigate a new island where a previous expedition had already been lost. I just don't see it happening. The Nostromo was ridiculously valuable; they might gamble it on it on an expedition where no real exceptional risks could be assessed, but it just doesn't make sense to gamble an expensive treasure ship, with an unqualified crew -- if they already knew that they'd lost an expedition.

      Of course they would never do that - which is exactly why they would do it: so as to make it appear that they didn't know about the aliens in advance (see also: value of alien ship/DNA > value of laden treasure ship). Standard operating procedure.

    49. Re:Who cares about the humans by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 1

      Not even the events in Aliens require FTL travel

      Ripley expected to be back for her daughter's birthday (per the director's cut) and the Marines all pretty much acted the way their current counterparts would when shipping out for a short mission. ("We get back without you, I'll tell your folks.") It's pretty clear that there's FTL involved, even if for whatever reason people have to sleep through it. The idea of a relativistic interstellar culture such as you describe is an interesting one, and I think there's fertile ground for storytelling there, but the Alien universe isn't it.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    50. Re:Who cares about the humans by palindrome · · Score: 1

      This should be +5 *something* come on people, make it happen.

    51. Re:Who cares about the humans by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Don't worry. I'm on to doing a mashup right now.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    52. Re:Who cares about the humans by palindrome · · Score: 1

      They could have Ripley wake up at the climax of the film and say "Phew! That whole franchise was just a dream!" The final 25 minutes could be Ripley just getting a cup of coffee and slowly waking up until, just before the credits, the camera pans to her bed and we see Newt's skull with "Aliens are dead real" written in acid on it.

      Spooky.

    53. Re:Who cares about the humans by WCLPeter · · Score: 1

      though it may be worth the speculation as to how much botox it took to get Sigourney Weaver's skin 1979-tight

      Nah, they won't use Sigourney, they'll do what all Hollywood films these days seem to do; go for the full reboot with a complete re imagining and a younger cast.

      "Coming next summer, Ashley Tisdale and The Jonas Brothers in Alien: Rebirth!"

      *Shudder* Although now that I think of it, I would probably pay to see those Jonas twits take a bucket of acid to the face. ;-)

    54. Re:Who cares about the humans by jamesh · · Score: 1

      this movie will suck

      I hope it doesn't. I think all 4 so far were watchable (haven't seen alien vs predator so i'm not counting that), although the first two were by far the best, and for different reasons.

      One of the things I loved about the first movie was the untold story of the alien spaceship. Reminded me of various Stephen King stories where a whole lot of stuff went unexplained (the black blob in the Raft in particular - it was just 'there'). If they tell that story badly then I think the first movie will actually be worse for it - it takes away some of the mystery.

    55. Re:Who cares about the humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was supposed to be the premise to the sequel to Alien, way back when.

    56. Re:Who cares about the humans by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Remember, they wanted the aliens for their weapons division. Controlling them would be a huge financial windfall that would be worth the risk.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    57. Re:Who cares about the humans by pjtp · · Score: 1

      Two: The company knew the aliens existed by previously merely detecting/analyzing the beacon, then they might divert the Nostromo with the intention of picking whatever they find up. It would make sense, even to the subterfuge of planting Ash with extra orders to recover it, and diverting the ship so it picks up the beacon forcing the crew to respond (per their contract to respond to distress calls) allowing the company to get a 'free expedition' out the crew.

      Yes, but why redirect a commercial towing vehicle? Why not send a military ship? We know they could have as they sent the Sulaco in Aliens. The derelict wasn't going anywhere. I think your option one is far more likely.

    58. Re:Who cares about the humans by wulfhere · · Score: 1

      They should absolutely tie into the storyline (or at least the same universe). It's easy: either tell the story of the alien ship that the Nostromo found (cool, but unlikely), or just make sure everybody dies, or have the story end up being covered up by the Company, and that's the reason they send the Nostromo to check out that distress signal.

      --
      -- Sent from a computer.
    59. Re:Who cares about the humans by Latinhypercube · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Follow the 3rd race, the intelligent bio engineers. Damn I'd pay to see their home world and all the other bio creature they have designed. It would be like a giger world all cg and beautiful.

    60. Re:Who cares about the humans by lessthan · · Score: 1

      I always assumed that the Aliens were sentient.

      --
      Space Shuttle was a program that strapped humans to an explosion and tried to stab through the sky with fire and math
    61. Re:Who cares about the humans by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1
      There are lots of weak spots in the alien franchise... for example in aliens, after seventy-four years or so, had put a colony there that looked pretty new (Âtwenty years?). That would make fifty years just sitting in the knowledge that there was something there.

      Also, the mere idea of putting the colony to get the aliens is just foolish. A lot of investment just to feed the beasts, without knowing if someone could survive enough to provide the data needed. Sending an appropiate ship full of Ashes, or mercenaries, or some of the weapons development scientists with prior knowledge would have been faster, cheaper, and with more probabilities of success and withouth government intervention.

      On the original film, the fact that Ash was there and that it looked like that androids were relatively new and scarce seems to support that Weyland-Yutani knew something was there, but probably if they knew it was that dangerous they would have sent a better team. After all, if the ship lands but the aliens kill everyone before it can be sent back home there is no gain. Ash would be there probably as a "political officer" to put people in the "right track" and, in case things went wrong, to try to get the specimen back at all costs and/or kill everyone to avoid compromising the company.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    62. Re:Who cares about the humans by steveha · · Score: 1

      The Nostromo was ridiculously valuable; they might gamble it on it on an expedition where no real exceptional risks could be assessed, but it just doesn't make sense to gamble an expensive treasure ship

      I agree with most of what you say, but I think the above point is easily handwaved. The Nostromo could have been mostly or fully depreciated, and heavily insured; thus they get to buy a new, more efficient refinery ship a few years ahead of schedule if they lose it. Profit if the ship brings back the alien, profit if the ship is lost; win/win.

      It goes without saying that they didn't really care about the crew, but it's a plus if they lose fewer people, and maybe automated refinery ships have smaller crews than other sorts of ships.

      And maybe the Nostromo was the only ship they had in the area. It might have been Hobson's choice.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    63. Re:Who cares about the humans by Angostura · · Score: 1

      You forgot the other option: Aged Ripley sitting in a wheelchair, reminiscing about "how it all started" ... cue screen to go wavy.

    64. Re:Who cares about the humans by mfnickster · · Score: 1

      > I always assumed that the Aliens were sentient.

      Reportedly, in the first film Ridley Scott wanted an ending in which the alien bites off Ripley's head in the shuttle, sits down, and does the final log entry in her voice.

      Thank the gods this didn't come to pass - it would have ruined the film for me! :)

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    65. Re:Who cares about the humans by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Ripley expected to be back for her daughter's birthday (per the director's cut) and the Marines all pretty much acted the way their current counterparts would when shipping out for a short mission. ("We get back without you, I'll tell your folks.") It's pretty clear that there's FTL involved, even if for whatever reason people have to sleep through it. The idea of a relativistic interstellar culture such as you describe is an interesting one, and I think there's fertile ground for storytelling there, but the Alien universe isn't it.

      Hicks said it was 17 days before they would be declared overdue. Presumably that leaves say 3 more days of investigation and a 2 week travel time between Earth or wherever the Sulaco started from in human space and LV-426. Nostromo with the refinery was still months away from human space when they stopped at LV-426 so presumably either Nostromo was slow or there had been 57 years of FTL improvements. Either way travel time between stars ranges from weeks to months.

      Even if you figure that the speed difference between Nostromo and Sulaco was because of technology improvements over 57 years, hibernation would still be useful, routine, and available for shorter missions. If your ships are faster you are just going to travel further. Your range is your speed times your mission duration and the later only depends on your crew endurance and supplies.

      In Aliens communications with the colony are reportedly cut off but that does not necessarily mean FTL communications. Alien 3 had FTL communications but I would just throw that movie out along with Alien Resurrection.

      Calling the soldiers "Colonial Marines" also sounds like something from the age of sail. Travel time then was weeks to months and the fastest method of communication was to send a ship.

      I tend to ignore Alien Resurrection. I figure in that movie ships and communications moved at the speed of plot.

    66. Re:Who cares about the humans by Agripa · · Score: 1

      There are lots of weak spots in the alien franchise... for example in aliens, after seventy-four years or so, had put a colony there that looked pretty new (twenty years?). That would make fifty years just sitting in the knowledge that there was something there.

      Also, the mere idea of putting the colony to get the aliens is just foolish. A lot of investment just to feed the beasts, without knowing if someone could survive enough to provide the data needed. Sending an appropriate ship full of Ashes, or mercenaries, or some of the weapons development scientists with prior knowledge would have been faster, cheaper, and with more probabilities of success and with out government intervention.

      On the original film, the fact that Ash was there and that it looked like that androids were relatively new and scarce seems to support that Weyland-Yutani knew something was there, but probably if they knew it was that dangerous they would have sent a better team. After all, if the ship lands but the aliens kill everyone before it can be sent back home there is no gain. Ash would be there probably as a "political officer" to put people in the "right track" and, in case things went wrong, to try to get the specimen back at all costs and/or kill everyone to avoid compromising the company.

      I figure the company knew enough to put Ash on board Nostromo and deliberately placed them in a position of having to investigate the ship on LV-426 knowing that the crew would possibly or likely be killed. Taking advantage of an already planned refinery run just makes deniability easier. Once Nostromo is overdue, why admit to what happened? Conceal responsibility, let the ship be declared missing, and move on.

      50 years later a different division gets involved with terraforming LV-426 without knowing anything about its sinister history and when it becomes marginally habitable just shy of 74 years, open colony construction begins. "We call it a shake-'n-bake colony. Takes decades."

      Burke only investigates after hearing the story from the recently found Riply. Presumably he somehow finds some coordinates and enough to make the bioweapons connection. He uses the already existing colony project to investigate while maintaining deniability and then contact is lost, again. Queue the 20 miles of bad road that is Aliens.

      I have Foster's book and sometimes dream scripts and castings. Maybe I'm in the wrong business. Most Hollywood plots and movies are dreck.

    67. Re:Who cares about the humans by Agripa · · Score: 1

      Yes, but why redirect a commercial towing vehicle? Why not send a military ship? We know they could have as they sent the Sulaco in Aliens. The derelict wasn't going anywhere. I think your option one is far more likely.

      Sulaco is 57 years later. How long are cargo and military ships in service? Taking advantage of an existing refinery run allows for a great amount of plausible deniability. If you send a military ship, there are going to be questions before and even worse, later.

    68. Re:Who cares about the humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Arbiter with 100 energy?

    69. Re:Who cares about the humans by y_axis · · Score: 1

      I heard they were going to do that, but they couldn't get Rosanne Barr to play the lead roll.

      I doubt seriously she'd be able to play the lead roll very long before eating it.

    70. Re:Who cares about the humans by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      For God's sake man, you're pushing her plastic surgeon too far! Anything more will be an affront to God and push human skin well beyond the rules of both general relativity and quantum physics!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    71. Re:Who cares about the humans by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, the original Alien showed the alien pilot's corpse. He looked like a kind of humanoid elephant. It's unclear if they had created the bad aliens, or just encountered them.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    72. Re:Who cares about the humans by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Ditto. I've never even seen any of the AvP series, and I'm a HUGE Alien fan (even own the Quadrilogy box set, still IMHO the greatest DVD boxset of all time)

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    73. Re:Who cares about the humans by SiliconAddiction · · Score: 1

      Naaa its going to be the first human encounter with the aliens. How do you think the corporation knew to set the Nostromo down on LV426? Oh and I know how the movie already ends...they all die in a horrible cab..check that space cab accident...tragic really.

    74. Re:Who cares about the humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nostromo was diverted to the planet where they found the Xenomorph because someone in the company knew it was there

      Huh. Well, that certainly wasn't clear from the movie. I got the impression that Ash made a seat-of-the-pants decision.

    75. Re:Who cares about the humans by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The company didn't have conclusive evidence that there was anything on the planet until Ripley returned, some time after the colony was founded. They knew there was 'something' (although it's implied that the crew caused the distress signal to stop sending, so all that they really know is that there was something) and they knew that the Nostromo didn't make it home. They didn't have a full report. It's also not clear whether the company was responsible for the colony. I got the impression that they weren't; that someone else set it up and they just kept quiet about the potential danger. If it had been founded by one of their competitors then having them experience losses on the planet would give WY a commercial advantage...

      Ash seemed like an insurance policy. They didn't know what they'd find, but they thought that an android would have a greater chance of surviving something unknown and reporting back than a human - and be better able to keep secrets.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    76. Re:Who cares about the humans by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      And what exactly crewed the original ship?

      What was the crew is unknown, though it is presumed they are to the same scale as the Space Jockey. However, from scenes removed and later restored in Alien, those eggs could be what remains of the crew: the queen wasn't introduced until Aliens; instead the alien could bioform other beings into eggs.

      The "hold" may have been the ship's morgue if it wasn't so large and non-conforming in scale and shape to the ship itself. And we didn't see it having a proper entrance either: Kane was lowered down through what appeared to be an acid-formed hole in the deck.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  4. Great! by millia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now just sign up James Cameron to do the movie after *that* and we'll be good.

    --
    stored on computers from birth to the grave
    1. Re:Great! by deft · · Score: 5, Informative

      amen to that. 1979's 'alien' is good, but the 1986 'aliens' is what made my heart thump and want to be a space marine.

      GAME OVER MAN! GAME OVER!

      --

      There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    2. Re:Great! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1, Informative

      amen to that. 1979's 'alien' is good, but the 1986 'aliens' is what made my heart thump and want to be a space marine.

      GAME OVER MAN! GAME OVER!

      Somebody wake up Hicks.

    3. Re:Great! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1, Funny

      What do you mean, "*They* cut the power"? How could they cut the power, man? They're animals!

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    4. Re:Great! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      What do you mean, "*They* cut the power"? How could they cut the power, man? They're animals!

      I say we take off and nuke the site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.

    5. Re:Great! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm not convinced; prequels are rarely good. We should nuke it from orbit; it's the only way to be sure.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Great! by Scragglykat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The action/sci-fi (syfy?WTF?!) movie that James Cameron created, I have to admit, is about my favorite sci-fi movie of all time, it was non-stop, suspenseful, but action packed... they couldn't go with all suspense because we all already knew what was coming, just not in what quantity... but the original movie was horror/sci-fi at its finest (especially given the time it was created). I mean, if they remade that movie with today's special effects, it'd be amazing... but only the youth that hadn't seen the series would really get the full scare factor out of it. The thing is, people of the 70's didn't have aliens popping out of their neighbor's chests everyday, so when they saw that movie, it was disturbing... then the monster grew up quick and started killing old school... it was like when Doom 3 first came out and even though it was just a game, I'd jump when things popped out because i wasn't quite sure what would lurk around the next corner. By the time Aliens came out, chest popping aliens were the norm, so they had to make it an action flick to keep the interest going. Alien was a masterpiece, because it was horror defined. It wasn't some crazy person hacking people up, it was something totally unknown, moving around an environment we weren't familiar with, in a location where no help could be found. Aliens was a masterpiece, because it took that same mix, threw in space marines (who started out with the general attitude military units in space always have in movies) and then the situation deteriorated rapidly. There was still suspense, but there was also a lot of plot and character development. Shoot, they barely show Frost getting waxed, and I already missed him... and the sarge! I have a feeling a prequel may try to explain why the Nostromo was sent to LV-426 in the first place.

    7. Re:Great! by mikael · · Score: 1

      Yes, it wasn't in fact an iceberg which sank the Titanic, but an alien craft which was frozen in the permafrost, was knocked onto the deck of the Titanic during the collision. This caused the alien occupants of the craft to defrost and become conscious again. Upon leaving their craft, they acid-drooled their way onto the lower decks and then attempted to burrow their way out of the ship. This in fact caused the ship to sink and forced the aliens to go back into cryo-sleep. A future salvage mission accidently brought the occupants on board where they proceed to eliminate the crew one by one.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    8. Re:Great! by Globe199 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      This is a great idea for a movie. Alien vs Titanic!

    9. Re:Great! by jpedlow · · Score: 1
      "I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure. "

      BEST MOVIE EVER, Aliens really made me love that series.

    10. Re:Great! by Ephemeriis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      amen to that. 1979's 'alien' is good, but the 1986 'aliens' is what made my heart thump and want to be a space marine.

      GAME OVER MAN! GAME OVER!

      They're almost two entirely different genres...

      I love both movies, but comparing them just isn't fair.

      Alien is tense, claustrophobic, suspenseful... You've got a single creature stalking and killing the crew of the ship, one by one. It's more of a traditional stalker/slasher movie in that respect.

      Aliens is fast-paced, action-filled, loud, intense... Piles of aliens popping out of corners, getting mowed down, ripping people apart. Despite the fact that some of it is downright terrifying, it's more of an action movie than a horror film.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    11. Re:Great! by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      That actually IS a great idea for a movie!

      Aliens go to the titanic, mess up the timeline, marines go back in time to kill them all, and then have to decide to sink the ship themselves, to preserve history. With the wreck at the bottom of the ocean, little changes.

      Not a great movie, mind you, but a great idea... :)

    12. Re:Great! by schon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Alien is a suspense/thriller.

      Aliens is an action movie.

      Alien3 was a drama.

      Alien4 was a bad comedy.

    13. Re:Great! by raftpeople · · Score: 1

      Saw Aliens in the theater opening night, I had to keep telling myself to relax, that was a fun ride.

    14. Re:Great! by Ben+Newman · · Score: 1

      The sequels really needed to continue the genre change to be successful. Aliens 3 should have been a romantic comedy.

    15. Re:Great! by BigJClark · · Score: 1


      You're just a grunt, you can't make that kind of decision. ;)

      --

      Hi, I Boris. Hear fix bear, yes?
    16. Re:Great! by krou · · Score: 1

      Me and my squad of ultimate badasses will protect you!

      --
      'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
    17. Re:Great! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could even do a sequel to "Aliens" (i.e., completely ignoring the horrible Alien3 and Alien Resurrection).

    18. Re:Great! by SirGarlon · · Score: 4, Funny

      is what made my heart thump and want to be a space marine

      All the space marines in that movie died. Do you still want to be one? Me, I'd rather be a little girl.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    19. Re:Great! by sherpajohn · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is this going to be a stand-up film, sir, or another bug hunt?

      --

      Going on means going far
      Going far means returning
    20. Re:Great! by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1

      I smell a SyFy channel movie of the week.

      No, wait...I think that's my feet.

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    21. Re:Great! by uberjoe · · Score: 1

      amen to that. 1979's 'alien' is good, but the 1986 'aliens' is what made my heart thump and want to be a space marine.

      and die horribly. fify

      --

      The days of the digital watch are numbered.

    22. Re:Great! by Scragglykat · · Score: 1

      They could definitely capitalize on Seth Rogan's popularity right now... he's on fire... In space, no one can hear you LOL!

    23. Re:Great! by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

      Amen to that brother, preach it!

      --
      oogly boogly!
    24. Re:Great! by dicobalt · · Score: 0

      Agreed, it's as if someone forgot that time goes forward instead of backwards. We want to know what happens *next*.

    25. Re:Great! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Really?

      I wanted to be a sniveling weasel working for a gigantic corporation and doing anything, including murder, to get ahead at my career. Then to star in a boring sitcom with Helen Hunt.

    26. Re:Great! by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think they would have a problem making the same movie with today's special effects. Part of what makes suspense suspenseful is the unknown, the surprising. That's why classic thrillers and horror films don't give monsters all that much camera time -- not just because the effects were cheesey. You only see the monster in the shadows for a brief second. That way, your mind is at an information disadvantage, always wondering, "What's going to happen next?"

      Now when they do movies and they spend three months building a model of the creature they want to get as much mileage out of it as they can, so they do close ups, zoom in on it, show it eating, hanging out, waiting in its lair, hissing, do a slow mo wrap-around camera shot of it clawing its victim...

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    27. Re:Great! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Alien4 was a bad comedy.

      I'll say. Get bit by a drone in the back of the head and you reach back and pull out part of your brain/skull and look at it? That's bad comedy on the level of Return of the Living Dead Part II.

      At they very least it just took out your visual cortex.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    28. Re:Great! by jlund · · Score: 1

      amen to that. 1979's 'alien' is good, but the 1986 'aliens' is what made my heart thump and want to be a space marine.

      GAME OVER MAN! GAME OVER!

      Am I the only one who sees GAME OVER MAN as CHET the pile of bile from Weird Science?

    29. Re:Great! by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      All we know is that there's no contact with the colony, and that Ridley Scott is now confirmed to be involved.

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    30. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You secure that shit, Hudson.

    31. Re:Great! by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Alien is a suspense/thriller.

      Correction: Alien is a horror movie. Characters stumble down dark hallways, things jump out and get 'em. It's your basic haunted house flick, shifted to take place in outer space -- as many critics have observed. What made it great was that it was well-directed, well-paced, had an incredibly original visual style, and took its science fiction aspects seriously.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    32. Re:Great! by jamesh · · Score: 1

      The sequels really needed to continue the genre change to be successful. Aliens 3 should have been a romantic comedy.

      You're thinking of Aliens 4

    33. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aliens isn't really all that good. The best scene is with the robotic sentry guns. All 15 seconds of it.

    34. Re:Great! by stu9000 · · Score: 1

      We have reason to believe a xenomorph may be involved..... It's a bug hunt.

    35. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about John Carpenter?
      Dan O'Bannon & he made a prequal to Aliens - Darkstar (similar topic-ish)

    36. Re:Great! by antdude · · Score: 1

      "Maybe it's like an ant hive..." "Bees man, bees have hives." "You know what I mean. It's like one female that runs the whole show." "Yes, the queen." "Yeah the mamma. She is bad*ss, man. I mean big." "These things ain't ants estupido." "I know that."

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    37. Re:Great! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Is this going to be a stand-up film, sir, or another bug hunt?

      Interesting that the marines seemed to have experience with "bug hunts".

    38. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the internet you can be whatever you want to be.

    39. Re:Great! by tenton · · Score: 1

      No offense.

      None taken.

    40. Re:Great! by tenton · · Score: 1

      Based on what they've done with the "next" since Aliens...no. I don't want to know what happens "next".

    41. Re:Great! by tenton · · Score: 1

      That scene drove me crazy, because I swear I saw it and then I saw a few showings on TV and didn't see that scene at all.

      But Aliens was a great film. It was just a completely different film than Alien. And that's okay.

    42. Re:Great! by Walkingshark · · Score: 1

      Who DOESN'T want to be a little girl!?

      --
      The world you experience is only a close approximation of reality.
    43. Re:Great! by kurish666 · · Score: 1

      why don't we put you in charge

    44. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So would most cos-players

    45. Re:Great! by xpeeblix · · Score: 1

      Stand up FIGHT, not fil.....oh, wait, I see what you did there.

    46. Re:Great! by xpeeblix · · Score: 1

      Except she died too, though not until the next movie.

    47. Re:Great! by chebucto · · Score: 1

      That scene drove me crazy, because I swear I saw it and then I saw a few showings on TV and didn't see that scene at all.

      The auto-machine gun scene was deleted from the theatrical release, and only included in the special edition (first released on laserdisk in the early 1990s)

      --
      The English word fart is one of the oldest words in the English vocabulary.
  5. Is AVP/AVPR canon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is "Alien vs. Predator" and "Alien vs. Predator: Requiem" part of the canon? Will it be for this prequel?

    1. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 4, Funny

      One would hope not -- those movies were worse than AIDS.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    2. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first one was mediocre; at least they managed to cast Lance Henriksen. Your characterization is accurate for the second one, though.

    3. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it will be

      Alien vs Predator vs The Sith vs House Harkonnen vs The Replicators vs Goua-Old vs Vampire-Aliens-from-Stargate-Atlantis-but-I-forgot-their-name vs THE NAZIS

    4. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      You forgot Daleks. And Cylons.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    5. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by Dogtanian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is "Alien vs. Predator" and "Alien vs. Predator: Requiem" part of the canon? Will it be for this prequel?

      I was going to ask the same thing. I've not seen it, and have no real desire to do so, but according to Wikipedia, Alien vs. Predator was intentionally a prequel to Alien (and a sequel to Predator) and deliberately took some effort- and altered its own setting- to avoid a situation where the events in Alien would be rendered implausible if not impossible. (Primarily, they couldn't set it in a city because everyone would then have been aware of the existence of the aliens before Alien took place).

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    6. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by maxume · · Score: 1

      What was AIDS about?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by josh61980 · · Score: 1

      Borg as well.

    8. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If they make AvP non-canon, then maybe they can do the same with Alien3 and Alien: Resurrection.

    9. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      They were awesome videogames, though.

    10. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Ash vs. Aliens

      Jason vs. Predator

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    11. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Alien vs. Predator: Requiem"

      My only comfort in having watched this movie was being able to warn my pregnant wife not to watch it. Somehow the series went from "space marines vs. aliens" to "let's see what happens when aliens lay eggs in a maternity ward!"

    12. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      AvP's tagline, "Whoever wins, we lose," was the most apropos tagline since Highlander's "In the end, there can be only one."

    13. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      What was AIDS about?

      Clichéd horror. Everybody dies.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    14. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by Mechanik · · Score: 1

      If they make AvP non-canon, then maybe they can do the same with Alien3 and Alien: Resurrection.

      Agreed. I really wish they would film William Gibson's script for Alien III instead. If you get a chance, read it, it's awesome. It reads more like a novel than a script.

      In summary... it was written at the time where Sigourney Weaver didn't want to do a sequel, and picks up where Aliens left off, except that the Sulaco drifts into Communist territory and is intercepted. Problem is, there are still aliens on the ship. The script basically centres around Hicks, as Ripley spends most of it in a coma. Lots of combat action... a true sequel to Aliens, rather than the butchering of the franchise we have been subjected to instead.

    15. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      What about "Alien vs. Requiem"? Even acidic blood is no match for Tappy Tibbons' Month of Fury.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    16. Re:Is AVP/AVPR canon? by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      How about ?

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  6. Yeah, may not be so great. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    IMDB currently lists him having FOURTEEN projects "in development". So either he spends barely any time at all on any of them (and they all suck) or this movie will not come out until sometime in the 2020's (and we will all be dead from swine flu).

    1. Re:Yeah, may not be so great. by Anonymusing · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Aliens versus Swine Flu"?

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    2. Re:Yeah, may not be so great. by mikael · · Score: 1

      I'd say that's rather impressive. But a couple of those projects are repeated three times (Battle Angel and Avatar), so that brings the total down to eleven. There is a whole pipeline from script-writing, auditioning, actual filming, visual effects, compositing and editing, so he might not be involved in all those stages. I would imagine he would concentrate on the visual effects.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:Yeah, may not be so great. by mike260 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That'd be more of a sequel to "Aliens versus Bacteria" though (aka "The War of the Worlds")

    4. Re:Yeah, may not be so great. by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Ridley Scott produces movies that he does not direct, so this isn't much of an indication of anything.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  7. Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "I don't know if you've been keeping score... But we're getting our asses kicked, here!" I love it and can't wait.

    1. Re:Sweet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The original quote was, "Hey, maybe you haven't been keeping up on current events, but we just got our asses kicked, pal!"

  8. when will we get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will we get Alien vs Predator vs Terminator vs Kindergarton Cop?

    1. Re:when will we get by Abreu · · Score: 1

      It is not a Tumor! It is the Republican Party!

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:when will we get by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      When will we get Alien vs Predator vs Terminator vs Kindergarton Cop?

      There's no chance of such a ludicrous thing happening. They'd never want to risk any of those valuable franchises becoming tainted by a string of increasingly ludicrous sequels and crossovers...

      Oh, wait.

      Erm.... well, on second thoughts, they'd never risk the valuable Kindergarten Cop franchise becoming tainted by a string of increasingly ludicrous sequels and crossovers.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:when will we get by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Kwush yur enomies, see dem dwiven befwoe you. And heah deh lamenation of teh wimmin!

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    4. Re:when will we get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew there was going to be an Alien v. Predator movie when I saw Predator 2 with Danny Glover, when he boards the Predator ship and looks around there is an Alien Skull trophy.

      On a side note ..There was a really cool Darkhorse Comic Predator versus Batman. The current batman movie series is capable of taking this on.

  9. Here's hoping. by Snarkalicious · · Score: 1

    If this one goes through, it cannot be allowed to suck. If the franchise takes any more abuse, it'll end up applying for asylum in Iceland. Then they'll give to to Bjork for Christmas and we're all f***ed.

    1. Re:Here's hoping. by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      I'm hoping they come out with an Alien vs Predator: On Ice!

      I can't think of a single choreographer who wouldn't just faint at the chance of helping produce such a number!

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  10. *crosses fingers* by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I so hope he can pull this off, unfortunately horror/action directors don't seem to age as well as suspense/noir/drama directors do.

    OFCS saved me from the latest Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Transformer and Terminator fiascoes, this may be another one I'll have to miss...but I hope not. Ridley Scott may be old, but he has an eye for quality, and he has clout. Here's hoping he can nail this, and give us a proper Alien trilogy (prequel, original, and Aliens of course).

    *NOTE TO FOX - please put the money down and hire a talented writer and editor!*

    (my other hand has fingers crossed for James Cameron and Avatar)

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    1. Re:*crosses fingers* by edwardsdigital · · Score: 1

      I didn't mind the third movie since it kinda made sense. I would like a proper quadrilogy though. I hadn't seen Resurrection before I bought the 9 disk Alien Quadrilogy set and haven't bothered watching that movie since.

    2. Re:*crosses fingers* by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Really? I thought Alien3 was the worst of the series, easily, though A:R wasn't too good either.

    3. Re:*crosses fingers* by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1
      A:R was really the worst of the lot. The movie didn't have even the slightest coherence. A few aliens break free and in a few minutes there are tens of them and lots of eggs and a nest through all of the ship. Not to count the fact that they got some creatures with acid as blood inside cells without protection against acid, or that after getting the feat of cloning aliens and Ripley from tissue recovered a couple of centuries before they still need to see a physical alien to study it. And the military ask some pirates to kidnap people and after that they let them roam through the whole ultra-secret installation, instead of dismissing/killing them.

      I enjoyed the first three. Alien3 was a back to origins film (the sheeps trying to kill the wolf before the wolf kills them one by one), althougt it also put more focus in secondary details (the lives of the prisoners, the alien inside Ripley). Aliens was a war movie, reminded a lot of films where lots of sneaky Vietcong attack well armored marines. I understand if someone does not like some of the first movies (or none at all) but the fourth one was -almost objectively- the worst of all.

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    4. Re:*crosses fingers* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OFCS saved me from the latest Star Wars, Indiana Jones, Transformer and Terminator fiascoe

      How did the Olmsted Falls City Schools help you out?

  11. Pilot / Space Jockey by mugnyte · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I sure hope they throw a bit at the Pilot/Space Jockey subplot.

    There's lots already proposed for that item's existence in the story, and I'd be happy with almost any of them.

  12. I'll never let go!!! by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Meh -- after Titanic I lost all my faith in James Cameron. I don't want to let him near the Alien franchise again, Ridley Scott has yet to let me down, though. I always thought Alien was better, anyway, but that is just my opinion.

    --
    To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    1. Re:I'll never let go!!! by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      People kick Titanic all the time, but I still like it. Maybe it is not for everyone, but I popped in the DVD the other night and watched it all the way through. In fact, I put down the laptop to watch it. That's a lot better treatment than I give a lot of what I get out of the Redbox.

      In short, Titanic is still, to this day, better than a lot of what Hollywood presently puts out.

      Back to topic, yes, get Mr Cameron on the project, pretty please.

    2. Re:I'll never let go!!! by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      Titanic was an just an ok movie. The reason that people kick it is because it was treated at the time like it was much, much, much better than ok. It wasn't so much the critics that were fawning over it, but it made like a gazillion dollars in the theater and won 11 Oscars, including Best Picture

    3. Re:I'll never let go!!! by cawpin · · Score: 1

      Agreed, Titanic is NOT a bad movie. It has some cheese, but it to be expected. Overall, it a very good movie.

    4. Re:I'll never let go!!! by howe.chris · · Score: 0

      It is not that bad. At least they didn't change the ending to make it more dramatic.

      The rescue ship arrived before the Titanic sunk. They attached the super strong ropes and was even able to keep the Titanic from sinking. Then the "bad" man cut the ropes when they were saving poor kids. Then Jake (or whatever Leonardo's name was) pulled out his sword and fought the enemy knocking him to his icy death. But he cut the last "important" rope during the fight. Jake died after saving all of the poor women and children. Only the men died.

    5. Re:I'll never let go!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, Alien was better. It's still terrifying and squirm inducing to this day, even if the pacing is much slower than we're used to these days.

      But Aliens was more fun, in a guns beer and spaceships sort of way. And that's not a bad thing.

    6. Re:I'll never let go!!! by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I actually enjoyed 'Titanic' as well, but it's definitely a "big screen" movie. I don't own it on DVD just because it's one of those films that doesn't work unless you're in a theater, at least for me.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  13. Sheer number of memorialbe quotes by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

    I just browsed IMDB's memorable quotes section for "Aliens" - It seems that most of the character's scripts are in there!

    There must be close to 115 quotes in the section - that's got to be some sort of record.

    (I lost count after ~100. I dont know Perl so could someone be so kind as to count the number of section breaks in the HTML?)

    1. Re:Sheer number of memorialbe quotes by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Funny

      How about you just wget it and use grep?
      Oh noes you may have to learn something.

    2. Re:Sheer number of memorialbe quotes by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      Technically, it is a "quotes" section... memorable? Meh.

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    3. Re:Sheer number of memorialbe quotes by FesterDaFelcher · · Score: 1

      There are 7613 quotes, to be exact. Each quote has an average length of 453 characters, and the letter "f" is the most used character in each quote.

      HTH, HAND.

      --
      My user number is prime. Is yours?
    4. Re:Sheer number of memorialbe quotes by sootman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Each actor's name is a link so

      curl -s http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/quotes | grep "/name/" | wc -l

      shows 339 individual spoken lines. There's a horizontal rule (width=30%) after each block of dialog and

      curl -s http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0090605/quotes | grep "grep "hr width" | wc -l

      shows 102 HRs. Each of those numbers may be a bit off (I see at least one other HR on the page; there might be other name links as well)--sometimes you need manual labor, not code, to get exact answers to annoying questions like this.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:Sheer number of memorialbe quotes by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      That's odd. I'm pretty sure I submitted some of those and corrections for others, but they're not in my update history. In particular, the stage direction of Gorman turning back to the monitor and the first lines submission.

      Anyway, judging from the size of the thumb in the scrollbar, I think there are more quotes for Red vs. Blue: The Blood Gulch Chronicles.

      But I love some of the meta-humor you can get from entering some lines:

      Caboose: Enters stage left.
      Caboose: [enters stage left] Hello, I am Stupid Private Tucker. I am going to set off a big bomb now, and totally mess things up for everyone! Because I am stupid!
      Caboose: Turns around.
      Caboose: [turns around] Hello, Present, I am going to set off a bomb in you.
      Grif: Don't do that, Stupid Private Tucker, that might kill me!
      Caboose: Thinks about this... for a moment.
      Donut: [as Caboose thinks about this for a moment] Caboose, stop reading your stage directions!
      Caboose: You said I was supposed to read anything with my name in front of it!
      Donut: Just the lines, not the blockings. You're ruining my big debut!

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  14. The human SPECIES, not the human race... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you "illiterati"!

  15. Story Should Make Sense by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Funny

    This story should make sense because the original story directly implied prior knowledge of the Alien organism prior to its "discovery" in the movie--although why anyone thought it needed "protecting" is beyond me. It always seemed quite capable of protecting itself.

    Best alien joke: The cartoon of the Imperial Storm Trooper with a face-grabber on its face saying, "I hate being the one to have to walk Lord Darth Vader's pet."

    And yes, after seeing the original Alien in an evening movie showing without knowing what it was really about ahead of time, I left the bathroom light on that night afterwards just in case. I'm sure I wasn't the only one.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Story Should Make Sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember watching it in a crowded 1200 seat theater. When the alien first popped out of Hurt's chest there was this collective gasp instantly followed by a scream. Fun!

    2. Re:Story Should Make Sense by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      although why anyone thought it needed "protecting" is beyond me

      Depends on what you mean by protecting. Protecting in the sense of a trade secret makes sense. Weyland-Yutani didn't want anyone else poaching their Xenomorphs, after all...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Story Should Make Sense by Ephemeriis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And yes, after seeing the original Alien in an evening movie showing without knowing what it was really about ahead of time, I left the bathroom light on that night afterwards just in case. I'm sure I wasn't the only one.

      I first saw this movie when I was entirely too young to be watching such things. It was on TV one night and I was watching it with my father. Unfortunately, my mother decided it was time for bed right about the time Ripley was setting the ship to self-destruct. The last thing I saw, before going to bed, was Ripley stumbling across the Alien as she fled for the lifeboat.

      I had horrible nightmares that night.

      The first thing I asked my father, upon waking the next morning, was whether they had killed the Alien or not.

      That movie continued to haunt my dreams... I eventually decided that wrapping a blanket over my head like a hood would somehow keep the facehuggers from getting a good grip, and started sleeping that way. To this day I feel most comfortable with a blanket looped over my head like a hood.

      Interestingly enough, I have since grown to absolutely love both the Alien movies and HR Giger's artwork.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    4. Re:Story Should Make Sense by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      same thing happened to me, almost verbatin, including sleeping with the sheets wrapped around my head.

      Movie scarred me bad, I was 7 when I saw it....waaaay to young.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    5. Re:Story Should Make Sense by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I saw about 30 seconds of some werewolf movie at a friends house when I was about 6 and had nightmares for weeks. I think the movie in question was supposed to be a comedy but I was an impressionable 6 year old with a vivid imagination.

      At about that time, a bunch of kids at school were talking about this alien movie and I felt like I was missing out. I think my parents knew what they were doing though.

      I love horror movies but my wife doesn't particularly fancy them, and we have 4 young kids so I can only watch them late at night. By myself.

    6. Re:Story Should Make Sense by styrotech · · Score: 1

      I first saw this movie when I was entirely too young to be watching such things. It was on TV one night and I was watching it with my father.

      Speaking of fathers....

      I first saw it (or at least the first half) during my 10th birthday a couple of years after it came out. VHS was still a very new thing in NZ at the time, and my father had rented this huge beast of a top loading VCR and a camera (also rather large and wired to the VCR) on a tripod to record the event. And he also rented a movie (you guessed it) for the gathered 10yr olds to watch while eating :)

      It wasn't long until there were only two kids left in the room watching - me and Jake. I was merely glued there by the shock of it all, but I think Jake thought it was the coolest thing he'd ever seen. About halfway in, my folks decided that it probably wasn't the best idea after all and stopped it. Jake spent the next weeks trying to draw the Alien from memory, before finally getting to see the rest of the movie himself.

      Good times :)

    7. Re:Story Should Make Sense by Agripa · · Score: 1

      And yes, after seeing the original Alien in an evening movie showing without knowing what it was really about ahead of time, I left the bathroom light on that night afterwards just in case. I'm sure I wasn't the only one.

      I saw it in a theater when I was 9 and had nightmares for weeks. I still do occasionally.

  16. Good film by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    the 1986 'aliens' is what made my heart thump and want to be a space marine.

    funny, it made me want to be an alien...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  17. ummm by nomadic · · Score: 4, Funny

    Since it's obviously going to involve the human race [...] Writer Jon Spaihts successfully pitched to Fox

    So...it was successfully pitched to Fox because...it will involve the human race? Only Fox greenlights movies involving humans? Or do they always greenlight movies involving humans?

    1. Re:ummm by SpyPlane · · Score: 1

      I thought the same thing... why is one implying the other? What the hell is the "[...]" that makes the two connect. Maybe Jon Spaihts loves writing about humans?

      I bought a dog today [...] North Korea test launched a missle!

      --
      "We need a fourth law of Robotics: Stop Fingering My Wife"
    2. Re:ummm by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, to FOX employees, humans are as exotic, as the Alien is to us.

      -- Glen Beck

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:ummm by jamesh · · Score: 1

      So...it was successfully pitched to Fox because...it will involve the human race? Only Fox greenlights movies involving humans? Or do they always greenlight movies involving humans?

      It's not that they _won't_ go ahead with movies without humans in it, but the contract between Kang/Kodos and Fox is very specific about their dietary requirements and it's just easier that way.

    4. Re:ummm by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Well, to FOX employees, humans are as exotic, as the Alien is to us. -- Glen Beck

      I don't know why, maybe I really am crazy. After reading this, I can't hold back any longer... I just need to... cry for no reason.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    5. Re:ummm by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      It's because only with the Glen Beck signature, it makes as little sense as Glen Beck's usual statements.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  18. Opening for more Giger? by mugnyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While his style is well-known, there is possibly still something more to ask of him that would tie the movies together outside of any simple plotline.

      If he could be commissioned for something new, using some of the erotic or torture pieces as a haunting/dream-like "infection" plot device, he might be able to really breath some new visual life into the series.

      Giger was given ample room to express himself in the original, but sadly was not credited as much as he should have been for the derivative works of the monsters. This could be a great way to welcome him back, although I've read that he can be a bit eccentric to work with (The Ghost Train ordeal).

    1. Re:Opening for more Giger? by east+coast · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, Giger did more work for the first one where one of the early concepts (from the Criterion laser disc edition) was to show that the Alien was actually a progressive species with a written language and culture. It would be great to show that side of the Alien. Instead of having these dumb feral beasts we could see a society of them. There would be a million possibilities with that story line and one that was obviously considered at one point.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    2. Re:Opening for more Giger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Opening for more Giger? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      this sounds great. Maybe make it something like the Star Wars Christmas special except replace the Wookies with Aliens.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Opening for more Giger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the chronicles of riddick and species are heavily giger-imbuet, but still not great movies...

    5. Re:Opening for more Giger? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you post this here? Do you want to base a movie on these? If so, thanks for the early warning.

      Anyway, please spam somewhere else.

    6. Re:Opening for more Giger? by Orange+Crush · · Score: 1

      I don't remember who said this, but someone suggesting something along those lines . . . they meet some civilized xenomorphs who apologize profusely that they had the misfortune of encountering uneducated hatchlings and invite the humans over for tea or something.

    7. Re:Opening for more Giger? by kindbud · · Score: 1

      I think if they just cast Giger himself as the alien, the movie will scare the shit out of anyone.

      http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/H._R._Giger.jpg

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    8. Re:Opening for more Giger? by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen the painting you describe, but I saw one that was equally impressive. Giger had an image of the 'life cycle' of the alien in a human astronaut, but it looked like it was carved in relief, like a hieroglyph. It made it seem much more terrifying, that there was some ancient knowledge about a life form that lives as a parasite to a human host. It was a more humbled view of humanity's place in the cosmos and the food chain. "There's aliens out there that mature by growing inside of us and killing us, and there's nothing we can do about it. That's our place in the web of life."

      It seemed like it may have been an inspiration for AvP, which blew. This painting was awesome, and cosmically terrifying.

      Ah, here it is.

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    9. Re:Opening for more Giger? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if Jar Jar Binks feels the wrath of the aliens... Then it truly would be a Merry Christmas for all!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    10. Re:Opening for more Giger? by physburn · · Score: 1
      What sort of culture would a beast that's busts out humans (and predictors) stomachs have. Possibly a huge catalog of which species make could homes for there young, and how best to subdue them. Epic tales of queens valiantly defined there nests against nature disasters maybe.

      ---

      Sci-Fi Movie Feed @ Feed Distiller

  19. Another AvP filler? by u64 · · Score: 1

    Will they try doing something good (creative)

    or yet another AvP filler ?

    There was rumors that Alien5 was going for Alien2-quality. So now we

    wont get that :(

    Perhaps they aim for Alien1-quality?

    Either way, 97% chance they will fail and the poor audience will suffer the cost.

    I remember a time when they did movies because they had something

    important to tell us. And something new to show us.

  20. Scifi-horror, not action please! by Oyjord · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Though Aliens was fun, Alien is far superior a film since it was a true Sci-Fi/Horror experience. If they can recapture that slow, moody fear of the first film, I'm in! But the second I see explosion after explosion and excessive gunplay in any trailer, I'm out.

  21. Aliens 3 and Alien Resurrection by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Can't the franchise just die after the horrible efforts done by Jean-Pierre Jeunet's Alien Resurrection and David Fincher's Aliens 3? I think these films ruined Aliens forever. And After the first sequel the direction and feel of the franchise went in a massively different direction from Ridley Scott's version.

    James Cameron's Aliens was fun but Ridley Scott's Alien has so much atmosphere to it. But Ridley Scott's version, while more artistic and interesting was not the box office smash that Aliens was.

    Perhaps there is some way to recover the franchise, but I suspect your average movie-goer will be pissed at Scott's attempts at a prequel because it will likely not be anything like a film done by James Cameron, which is what people have come to expect from Aliens.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Aliens 3 and Alien Resurrection by krou · · Score: 1

      Can't the franchise just die after the horrible efforts done by Jean-Pierre Jeunet's Alien Resurrection and David Fincher's Aliens 3? I think these films ruined Aliens forever.

      After Alien Resurrection, I must admit that I then realised Aliens 3 was actually not such a bad film after all.

      --
      'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
    2. Re:Aliens 3 and Alien Resurrection by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I know I was critical in my post. but I actually liked Aliens3. But oddly enough I liked the book they made of it much better. But I think I liked it because the whole prisoner survival thing is cool. Horrible criminals aren't so bad if they need your help to survive something more horrible than them. Those kinds of stories are always fun to me.

      Alien Resurrection did have a cool sort of adventure feel to it. as they progressed through different areas and environments. It was sort of like a Lord of the Rings kind of grand adventure. I think I just had trouble with the suspension of disbelief when it came to the entire plot and premise of the film.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:Aliens 3 and Alien Resurrection by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      But Ridley Scott's version, while more artistic and interesting was not the box office smash that Aliens was.

      Are you sure? The way I remember it, Alien was a very talked-about, very popular film in 1979. And if IMDB is to be believed, it pulled in $60 million by the end of its run that year.

      Apocalypse Now won the best picture Oscar in 1979. IMDB's info here is a little scanty, but apparently it grossed $79 million that year. Other nominees included All That Jazz, which grossed $38 million, and Breaking Away, which grossed $16 million. Kramer vs. Kramer was also nominated, though it apparently wasn't actually released until 1980, and it went on to gross in excess of $100 million. Still -- Alien was no slouch. If it wasn't a "box office smash," maybe that's cuz the studio was expecting the next Star Wars or something. And be fair: Aliens was an action movie. Those have always sold better than horror movies.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:Aliens 3 and Alien Resurrection by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

      "Perhaps there is some way to recover the franchise, but I suspect your average movie-goer will be pissed at Scott's attempts at a prequel because it will likely not be anything like a film done by James Cameron, which is what people have come to expect from Aliens"

      James camerons was easily the best in the series. The first aliens while not bad was too plodding and lets also not forget it was a different generation. I'm at a loss why they didn't get James Cameron to do all the subsequent aliens.

      I agree that the series totally died with the third installment and then the torture that was alien resurrection.

      Aliens 3 wasn't TOO bad (as a movie on its own), but it warped the series expectations, you were just like "what the fuck" after you watched it wondering how they could have messed up such a great series after the Aliens.

    5. Re:Aliens 3 and Alien Resurrection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well said!

    6. Re:Aliens 3 and Alien Resurrection by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To call Aliens 3 "David Fincher's" is a fucking joke - his version was a lot better than the horse shit you saw on screen. I'm sure you can find more info online.

  22. Meh, Alien was your basic horror movie by serutan · · Score: 0

    The first half of Alien was a well-produced space story with interesting character interactions and nice effects. But the second half devolved into a very typical Friday-the-13th scenario, in which the characters wander off one by one into the spooky darkness and get killed. The main departure from convention was that the sole survivor wasn't a shy female virgin. Harry Dean Stanton even did the classic horror movie death maneuver: walk into a dark room, look up at the ceiling while slowly turning around, and end up backing into the monster. This director was hailed as a genius? Come on.

    1. Re:Meh, Alien was your basic horror movie by Rick+Genter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You seem to forget that Alien predated Friday the 13th, A Nightmare on Elm Street, and most of the other "classic horror" movies:

      Alien (1979)
      Friday the 13th (1980)
      A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

      Only Halloween (1978) predates Alien, and by a short enough period that I think it's safe to say that Alien was well underway before Halloween hit the theater.

      --
      Don't underestimate the power of The Source
    2. Re:Meh, Alien was your basic horror movie by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "It! The Terror from Beyond Space (1958)"

      "Out of the fifties 'B' Science-Fiction monster movies, this easily ranks as the best. It's most notable as the film that ALIEN is an unaccredited remake of, thus giving it a certain historical significance."

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    3. Re:Meh, Alien was your basic horror movie by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Uh, Alien came out *before* all the movies you're trying to imply they ripped-off.

      You seriously don't think it's one of the greatest horror movies of all times? You can honestly watch it in a darkened room and never once feel a twinge of suspense?

      You're either a liar or a robot.

    4. Re:Meh, Alien was your basic horror movie by pavon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, it beat the 80's Horror Film Peak, but there were plenty before that. Ridley himself pitched the movie as "Texas Chainsaw Massacre in Space" when trying to sign on people who were initially not enthused about doing a SciFi film.

      But wasn't "just" a horror movie. It was an awesome horror movie.

    5. Re:Meh, Alien was your basic horror movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dracula (1931) or The Wolf Man (1941) are "classic horror" movies. Alien is a sci-fi "slasher flick."

      Still, as a "Slasher Film" it has numerous precedents. It even pitched to the studio as "Jaws in Space!"

    6. Re:Meh, Alien was your basic horror movie by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      You seem to forget that Alien predated Friday the 13th, A Nightmare on Elm Street, and most of the other "classic horror" movies:

      Alien (1979)
      Friday the 13th (1980)
      A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984)

      Only Halloween (1978) predates Alien, and by a short enough period that I think it's safe to say that Alien was well underway before Halloween hit the theater.

      It! The Terror from Beyond Space (1958)

      "Out of the fifties 'B' Science-Fiction monster movies, this easily ranks as the best. It's most notable as the film that ALIEN is an unaccredited remake of, thus giving it a certain historical significance."

      Also, if you're into this kind of stuff, Them! (1954) was probably an inspirational precursor to Aliens, just watch it and you'll see the parallels, some are glaring.

      Alien and Aliens were both done very well. There's nothing wrong with derivative work, as long as it's done well. I'd bet anything that the writers saw the above linked films as children.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    7. Re:Meh, Alien was your basic horror movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Alien is the ultimate predater.

  23. Specialized team? Not necessarily by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2, Informative
    If the company had known about it, they would have sent a specialized team there instead of diverting a freighter.

    Not necessarily. In the film, they use hypersleep - suspended animation - because even at whatever multiple of the speed of light the ships move at, trips still take months. (Script says they're near Zeta II Reticuli, 39 light years from Earth, and they still have ten months to go.) If they can transmit data faster than ships move (or unmanned ships can move faster) then mobilizing a specialist team might take more time than they want to spend, when they can divert a freighter going by anyway.

    The novelization (non-canon, but working from the shooting script) had Ash saying that the beacon had a fairly detailed warning, so the Company may well have known that parasitic aliens were there. No biggie, let the crew get infected and the ship return on autopilot.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:Specialized team? Not necessarily by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Um, weren't the Aliens found on a planet being terraformed? Remember, shooting up the guaranteed a big bang and everybody loses, including the Company.

      And the beacon, wasn't that the terraformers asking for help, or warning off any rescuers? A distress beacon, I thought.

      So the freighter charges in to save the day, not being told of the Aliens, which the Company wanted to monetize. See how stupid that sounds? Sending in amateurs was a safe bet to get an Alien back. They didn't account for Ripley.

      Of course the second flick has the Marines going in all frosty on another bug hunt. Typical gyrenes. And Ripley deals the Aliens both times. Not much help from the androld except at the end, being a company machine and all. He spent all his time entertaining the Marines and trying to get someone infected and on the way back to Earth, as if that was so hard to do. Damn that Ripley. I bet they did bill her.

      Crap, I got a memory like a sieve and I remember that... cmon guys, get the details right, ok?

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    2. Re:Specialized team? Not necessarily by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, weren't the Aliens found on a planet being terraformed? Remember, shooting up the guaranteed a big bang and everybody loses, including the Company.

      At the time of Alien the planet wasn't being terraformed. The events of Alien and Aliens were seperated by nearly 60 years, Ripley having been suspended in hypersleep between them.

      And the beacon, wasn't that the terraformers asking for help, or warning off any rescuers? A distress beacon, I thought.

      No, the distress beacon was coming from the crashed alien ship that was infected by xenomorphs.

      So the freighter charges in to save the day, not being told of the Aliens, which the Company wanted to monetize. See how stupid that sounds? Sending in amateurs was a safe bet to get an Alien back. They didn't account for Ripley.

      The freighter was sent in with the mission of investigating whatever the beacon was. The company possibly already knew about the beacon and what it meant though the official story on the Nostromo was that they were just investigating a mysterious distress beacon.

      Not much help from the androld except at the end, being a company machine and all. He spent all his time entertaining the Marines and trying to get someone infected and on the way back to Earth, as if that was so hard to do.

      The android from Alien (the science officer) was trying to get someone infected and returned to earth. However the android from Aliens (Bishop) wasn't, rather it was a company man (human) that was actively trying to get humans infected and back to earth.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    3. Re:Specialized team? Not necessarily by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Like I wrote, my memory is a sieve.

      It was an alien ship beacon at first, that found the Aliens?

      Oh, yeah, and they went and tried to terraform the planet. Smooth move. Ripley was kinda amazed/astonished/angry at that.

      Crap, crap, crap. I gotta go rent those and brush up.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    4. Re:Specialized team? Not necessarily by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

      No, IV-426 was not being terraformed in the first film. Indications from the second film are that at the point the Nostromo discovered the beacon the company had not begun terraforming *anything*. IV-426 was an unexplored world at the time of the first film (this is confirmed in both the first and second films).

      Carter Burke signed off on the terraforming process on IV-426 because he wasn't sure that the alien ship with the distress beacon even existed and he wanted to make money.

      The Beacon was coming from the alien ship that was loaded with eggs. With some kind of LARGE alien creature who appeared to be organically a part of the chair it was sitting in with a burst ribcage. The first 1/3 of the film is spent trying to decode the beacon and figure out what it is saying.

      Bishop never tried to have anyone infected...Burke did.

    5. Re:Specialized team? Not necessarily by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Um, weren't the Aliens found on a planet being terraformed?

      In the first movie the planet was originally going to be Io, the innermost gallean moon of Jupiter. There wasn't any mention of terraforming and surface conditions resembled those on Io.

    6. Re:Specialized team? Not necessarily by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the company had known about it, they would have sent a specialized team there instead of diverting a freighter.

      Not necessarily. In the film, they use hypersleep - suspended animation - because even at whatever multiple of the speed of light the ships move at, trips still take months. (Script says they're near Zeta II Reticuli, 39 light years from Earth, and they still have ten months to go.) If they can transmit data faster than ships move (or unmanned ships can move faster) then mobilizing a specialist team might take more time than they want to spend, when they can divert a freighter going by anyway.

      The novelization (non-canon, but working from the shooting script) had Ash saying that the beacon had a fairly detailed warning, so the Company may well have known that parasitic aliens were there. No biggie, let the crew get infected and the ship return on autopilot.

      Also let us not forget that returning a "dangerous creature through ITC quarantine" is implied to be VERY VERY illegial. Like way more of an issue than say moving fissionable material through an airport nowadays. Sending out one of your uper-duper expensive research ships is probably going to get noticed (like maybe even requires stating who and what and why you are sending it to the ITC) as opposed to a bunch of expendable blue collar "truckers in space".

      BTW: While the Nostromo itself and its cargo are expensive, the ship is obviously able to be autopiloted back to Sol via Mother so it's not like there's actually that much risk. Crew dead? "Oh we're sorry there was a malfunction in the hypersleep chamber-here's some payoff cash to the families".

  24. Palin's new gig? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that she is no longer employed could this be her new gig?

    1. Re:Palin's new gig? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Only if she only shows up long enough to be killed in a particularly brutal manner.

      And she shouldn't get paid for the part either.

    2. Re:Palin's new gig? by Icegryphon · · Score: 1

      Only if she only shows up long enough to be killed in a particularly brutal manner. And she shouldn't get paid for the part either.

      So compassionate and caring you are.

    3. Re:Palin's new gig? by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I guess my post was about as compassionate and caring as she is.

      Besides, I was advocating that her character get killed brutally in a movie, not her personally. I guess you're one of those freaks who gets upset any time someone criticizes GWB, right?

  25. Prequel by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 2, Funny

    The first movie was about a single alien, the second was about about many aliens. If this is a prequel, it will have to be about the egg of that first alien before it hatched.

    "Hey, what's that?"
    "I dunno, man, but it looks pretty strange."
    "I've got a bad feeling about this..."
    (spooky music)

    1. Re:Prequel by mcsqueak · · Score: 3, Funny

      If this is a prequel, it will have to be about the egg of that first alien before it hatched.

      What came first, the alien or the egg?

  26. They knew for the same reason the Nostromo knew by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    The company received the signal and they decoded it. The subterfuge is that they send the Nostromo in to investigate an UNIDENTIFIED distress signal when they full well knew that it was instead a warning.

    The book of the movie, you should read it.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  27. as perhaps a related story by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    robert rodriguez is producing a new predator movie, called predators (like alien is to aliens?). perhaps on the predator home planet, again, completely ignoring the whole avp bullshit

    http://www.aintitcool.com/node/40865

    http://www.aintitcool.com/node/40879

    additionally, the director will be some hotshot hungarian horror director named nimrod antal. aintitcool had an interveiw with rodriguez about the project:

    http://www.aintitcool.com/node/41590

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  28. On slashdot, everyone can hear you...\ by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    On slashdot, everyone can hear you quote the WRONG MOVIE!

    This is ALIEN, not ALIENS.

    To get you started:

    It's a robot. Cowboyneal is a god damn robot.

    Bones are bent outward, like he exploded from inside.

    Here kitty, kitty, kitty. Meaow. Here Jonesy.

    Open the door!

    I can't do that dave... oops wrong movie (this line not the previous one).

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:On slashdot, everyone can hear you...\ by styrotech · · Score: 1

      On slashdot, everyone can hear you quote the WRONG MOVIE!

      This is ALIEN, not ALIENS.

      Huh, wouldn't an Alien prequel be an Aliens prequel too? It's called a series.

      Unless of course you would also have a problem with people discussing the Empire Strikes Back when it was announced that they were making Star Wars prequels?

  29. additionally by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    to find a dog, you merely open the closest door, and it will inevitably smack and disturb a sleeping dog

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  30. nobody should worry by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

    i have an inside track on the ideas they are basing the prequel on, and it harkens back to classic themes in shockingly new and original ways, not at all feeling like some high school sophomore clicked around a bit on wikipedia and retread tired, stale ideas

    for example, the story of the alien in the prequel will revolve around important rules that one should never break, which of course get inevitably broken:

    1. don't get the alien wet, or it immediately reproduces more of its kind asexually by budding from its back
    3. keep the alien away from bright lights... especially sunlight. this will kill it
    4. and don't ever feed the alien after midnight

    i think this is a brilliant and entirely original idea

    furthermore, the movie will start with a crashed ship full of religious pilgrims, a stowaway, a dangerous criminal, etc. the alien hunts them all down relentlessly one by one whenever the planet falls into eclipse and darkness. but the fearless criminal has special surgically altered eyes that allows him to see in pitch black, so he turns the tables and hunts the alien instead

    again, a brilliant and entirely original idea from hollywood for the alien prequel!

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:nobody should worry by iank · · Score: 1

      1. don't get the alien wet, or it immediately reproduces more of its kind asexually by budding from its back

      2. ???

      3. keep the alien away from bright lights... especially sunlight. this will kill it
      4. and don't ever feed the alien after midnight

      5. Profit!

    2. Re:nobody should worry by ghmh · · Score: 1

      I'm assuming that important rule #2 which was missed was:

      2. At some point in the movie the alien should decide it needs to phone home, and does so using some convoluted device cleverly assembled from everyday stuff lying around.

  31. Enter the true space marines by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tend to agree that aliens is more an action movie than a horror. However, with the current fetish with making movies after games, wouldn't it be cool if James Cameron directed a Warhammer40k movie? Those are the true space marines. Hell, you can make it even resemble aliens by letting those space marines fight the Tyranids on a remote planet or something.
    I just pray that Uwe Bolle doesn't direct a movie based on the warhammer universe. It would suck. Hard.

    1. Re:Enter the true space marines by schon · · Score: 1

      I just pray that Uwe Bolle doesn't direct a movie based on the warhammer universe. It would suck. Hard.

      Umm, you have five redundant words in there - "based on the warhammer universe" is completely extraneous.

  32. Make your own machinima by rwa2 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why wait for another Aliens movie? Grab your copy of Tremulous and get going! Pronto!

    My nightmares involve not being able to pounce away from a chainsuit fast enough.

  33. I'm impressed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I knew that some humor-resistant nerds will pop up and complain the I forgot THAT villian from some obscure sci-fi TV series from 1918 --- this is after all slashdot.
    But just 4 minutes to this complaint after my post leaves me impressed.

    and as a sidenote Cylons are not really evil since the sixes and eights have sex with humans.

    1. Re:I'm impressed by tenton · · Score: 1

      Women are evil.

  34. Re:Great ? by howe.chris · · Score: 0

    Not a great movie, mind you, but a great idea... :)

    No not really a great idea. So expect it to come out in 2011.

  35. capable of so much win - but probable fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok there is a blatant tie in for weyland yutani / colonies in firefly / serenity - 1st episode the cannon that is fired at the battle of serenity - the HUD has a weyland yutani logo in it for chrissake - there is so much more to this universe than has been explored

  36. i have a similar relationship with jaws by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i love to swim, but any large deep body of water i find myself in the middle of, and that jaws opening sequence fills my head

    like you, i saw it at an age i really shouldn't have

    although, fear of large fish is pretty primal, so i don't know how much of my reaction is the innate, or psychological damage from the movie

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  37. Alien by Bobtree · · Score: 1

    The original Alien is still the best by a long shot.

  38. While they're at it, they could make Alien and... by Animaether · · Score: 1

    While they're at it, they could make Alien and Aliens non-canon and just start anew!

    They could choose to completely ignore everything that's ever come before without any explanation whatsoever (hello Batman Begins)

    Or maybe they could do some time travel thing and claim it's now an alternate universe (hi Star Trek)

    Better yet, they could make it -seem- like it should be canon, but make it so utterly different from the other movies to the point of being confusing and having to leave the theater thinking "Well.. it had an Alien.. and they mentioned the Nostromo.. I *guess* that makes it canon?" (howdy, Terminator 4)

    So many options when you're trying to re-boot/re-imagine/re-fuck-up a franchise.

    Here's a thought.. maybe they could ditch the whole Alien idea and use their newfound funding to just make a kick-ass *relevant* movie. That way nobody can whine about how it killed their childhood memories, and if it ends up being -good-, they can actually pat themselves on the back instead of realizing that most people only saw it 'cos they liked the original (first two) movies.

  39. only on slashdot by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    is a comment like this modded as insightful rather than funny

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:only on slashdot by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Only on slashdot is the moderation system so broken that you can get modded as +1 Funny and -1 Overrated and actually lose something.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:only on slashdot by east+coast · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Mod parent up: Insightful

      (Sorry, I had to do it)

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    3. Re:only on slashdot by tpgp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Only on slashdot is the moderation system so broken that you can get modded as +1 Funny and -1 Overrated and actually lose something.

      Feature, not a bug. Funny trolls are still trolls.

      --
      My pics.
  40. Re:While they're at it, they could make Alien and. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    The problem with your idea is that it requires originality, which is something Hollywood simply doesn't have. They're just not any good at coming up with something totally new and making a kick-ass movie about it. They have had successes with this in the distant past, such as with Alien, The Terminator (1), etc., but these were all 25-30+ years ago. For some reason, they seem to be incapable of making totally new stories now, and have to revive old ones by making not sequels (like they used to do), but prequels.

    And even when they do come up with something new and successful, it's usually an adaptation of a novel, such as Lord of the Rings.

    So these days, since movies are expensive to make and risky, studios try to avoid risk by taking a story that's tried-and-true (Batman, Star Trek, Terminator, etc.) and making yet another version of it. Some of these are actually pretty good; I liked Christopher Nolan's Batman movies far more than any of those which preceded it. His were realistic and dark, the others were cartoonish and silly. JJ Abrahm's Star Trek was a pretty good retake on the series, considering many of the previous movies were downright terrible (ST:TMP, Star Trek V, Generations), but it probably would have been nice if that effort had been put into something totally new and fresh. I haven't seen T4 yet, though I'd like to, but T3 was also downright terrible.

  41. Beyond the Alien by BranMan · · Score: 5, Insightful


          You know, I loved the first two movies, and would have liked the series to progress as it seemed it should - 3 would have the Alien actually brought back to a space station around Earth, then 4 could be them getting TO Earth.

          But the point I wanted to make is that the next sequel should have someone stumble on the Alien's home planet - where they originally are from. Think about it - they are communal, live in a colony and can build a new one with a single individual, like some of our insects. They cooperate, can withstand very hostile environments. They have eggs that can do the same and lie dormant for long periods of time. They have lightning speed, hide really well, and have acid for blood.

          Now think about the world that could produce such a creature, with all those defenses. The Aliens.... are not even CLOSE to the top of the food chain. Imagine what horrors you would find on the world that produced them....

          THAT's the movie I want to see.

    1. Re:Beyond the Alien by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Here's another idea that would be sort of original: Push the Giger aliens into the background a little bit. Make it a "first contact" type of movie. The humans have, for the first time, encountered an alien race. They are the giant aliens that were found in the downed spaceship in the original movie. Humans have made tentative first contact... stuff seems OK... they've met up on a couple of occasions... it's a bold new era in the history of humanity... and that's most of the focus of the film. But there's a problem. The aliens, it seems, while apparently friendly, have a problem with parasites...

      OR, here's another one. Why were there all those eggs on the alien spaceship, laid out in such neat rows? Why was there that protective fog-layer over them? We never saw that fog in the second movie. Maybe the giant aliens put the fog there on purpose. Maybe the alien spaceship was a munitions ship. The Giger-aliens were actually manufactured by the giant aliens as weapons, and when the ship crashed, one of the aliens got loose and did what it did best. Humans were aware of these weapons based on their previous (top secret) contacts with the giant aliens ... and they wanted those weapons, which is why they diverted the Nostromo to the planet. And that would put a different spin on it as well: Instead of "evil, greedy corporation wants these weapons no matter what the cost," it could now come to light that the potential cost of NOT obtaining the weapons would be the destruction of the entire human race at the hands of the marauding giant aliens. No matter what, we have to find a way to capture and control the Giger-aliens, to balance the scales against what we now know is out there in the galaxy...

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:Beyond the Alien by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 1

      But the point I wanted to make is that the next sequel should have someone stumble on the Alien's home planet - where they originally are from. Think about it - they are communal, live in a colony and can build a new one with a single individual, like some of our insects. They cooperate, can withstand very hostile environments. They have eggs that can do the same and lie dormant for long periods of time. They have lightning speed, hide really well, and have acid for blood.

      Mmm, you're making an assumption there. What if the alien was bioengineered by a more advanced race as a weapon?

      Something like:

      A) we want to colonize this planet, but it's full of X and we're too lazy to kill them ourselves.
      B) no problem, release the hounds... (aliens)
      C) wait a few years
      D) release some kind of 'agent' into the atmosphere that kills them all
      E) colonize

      who knows...many possibilities.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    3. Re:Beyond the Alien by Faaln · · Score: 1

      You, my friend, would love Earth Hive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aliens:_Earth_Hive It has everything you listed; including the homeworld part.

    4. Re:Beyond the Alien by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1
      In fact, in the AvP video games (don't know if they are canonical, and I don't mind) they tell the aliens were bio-engineered by another (probably extinct by the aliens) alien race.

      It kinda makes sense, otherwise the ability to breed inside races completely new to them as the humans would be very hard to master

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    5. Re:Beyond the Alien by OzFalcon · · Score: 1

      Exactly!

      I see it as the Aliens/Eggs are in fact just a bio weapon. Even the ship - With it's built in alien was manufactured for war.
      This ship was perhaps hit in part of the bio egg weapons storage and infected the crew/pilot of the ship.
      ALSO - The TRUE aliens that created these bio eggs - May be Acid blood. As may well their enemy(s) they produced them for.
      And infection/gestation is very rapid - And can locate itself anywhere in the body. BUT for humans - There's not much acid to gestate in, And it's only located in the stomach. Hence the slower gestation and the only target area being the stomach (via mouth) for infection - It knows it must keep the recipient alive long enough to gestate with what little acid is available.

    6. Re:Beyond the Alien by jamesswift · · Score: 1

      Might not have a home planet.
      They could have completely evolved in space from a small stowaway creature in some space-faring specie's giant vessels.
      Or they could have been engineered as an ultimate weapon in an ancient war.
      And so on...

      --
      i wish i could stop
    7. Re:Beyond the Alien by master_p · · Score: 1

      What i d like to see is the USS Enterprise thrown by Q to the planet you describe. It would be extremely funny (for the aliens)...

    8. Re:Beyond the Alien by sysut1 · · Score: 1

      Now think about the world that could produce such a creature, with all those defenses. The Aliens.... are not even CLOSE to the top of the food chain. Imagine what horrors you would find on the world that produced them....

      In a novel adapted from the original scenario, there was significant hints that the aliens were not a species, but a biological weapon that proved to be too dangerous even for their creators.

      Now, that could lead to an interesting prequel...

    9. Re:Beyond the Alien by biscuitlover · · Score: 1

      YES PLEASE

      That is all

    10. Re:Beyond the Alien by javacrypto · · Score: 1

      Clearly, they are defending their eggs from a super predator. What kind of predator eats the eggs of other species?

      Weasels.

      Giant Space Weasels.

      The story almost writes itself.

  42. i liked the biological overtones by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    alien was basically "big bug in space". they had the thing's life cycle thought out in terms of egg->parasite->adult. it was really the first scifi movie where the monster wasn't a one dimensional big baddie, but a whole well-thought out three dimensional (biologically speaking) xenomorph, where the biological cycle itself was truly alien

    and yet NOT alien. fear of spiders, snakes, sharks, is innate and natural. and bugs usually elicit some sort of ancient biological horror because of what they represent in terms of threat to survival. heck, the alien's life cycle really is the same as plenty of parasitical insects on earth, like the tse-tse fly. so alien also plugged into this whole ancient psychological hate/ fear of parasites and insects, just like jaws did to great effect when it plugged into fear of big fish in the water (which came out what, 2 years before?). i guess they naturally extended that to big snake with anaconda, arachnophobia, etc, but obviously to not as great success

    then of course along came aliens, which bucked the odds of the sequel being worse than the original, and it did by basically expanding upon the biological notions in the first movie: well, if alien is just a big bug in space, lets give them a social insect like a hive of wasps or a colony of ants. complete of course with the queen, and her giant alien egg laying apparatus. so again, its totally alien, yet at the same time totally familiar and natural to anyone who has given even a cursory interest in the happenings of social insects, which basically describes human experience in any rural/ suburban community, not to mention probaby hardwired into our psychology as a threat, again, from millions of years of exposure

    finally, in aliens, they had the primal biological notion of species versus species vying for survival of its offspring, perhaps the most primal directive besides sex. with alien queen going up against ripley, where both motivations are the same: alien queen enraged at the death of her offspring, ripley protecting her (adopted) human child. complete with the line "get away from her you bitch!": its basically a catfight, something you would see on the serengeti: female lioness versus female hyena

    because in nature, as well as human society, no masculine rage can possibly be matched by the female's rage at protecting her offsping. its incredibly primal, incredibly biological, and incredibly powerful as a movie plot device, because its so real

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i liked the biological overtones by crotherm · · Score: 1

      +1 insightful...

      Nice post.

      not to mention probably hardwired into our psychology as a threat, again, from millions of years of exposure

      How true... Nothing freaks me out more than then egg laying critters that use animals as hosts.

      Also if you choose to and AvP to the discussion, I liked how the Aliens killed one of their own to free the queen. That shows evolved hive instincts.

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
    2. Re:i liked the biological overtones by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      AvP? What AvP? There was no AvP movie! There wasn't! I can't hear you, nanananananaNANANANA!

    3. Re:i liked the biological overtones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What movie? The original AvP was a damn good comic book.

      Actually, if you squint the right way, you can see that the producers of the non-existent movie started with the comic book, and then rewrote it probably dozens of times until they had destroyed everything but the barest outline of the story, filling it with substandard cookie-cutter action sequences.

  43. Just so long as they don't... by kindbud · · Score: 1

    ... rename the original 1979 film to "Alien: A New Hope."

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
    1. Re:Just so long as they don't... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Perhaps:

      "Alien: No Hope."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Just so long as they don't... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      I wonder what the Jar Jar Binks alien will look like?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  44. As someone who... by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

    Still watches Alien/Aliens/Alien3/Alien4 at least 2-3 times a year, This makes me happy. It's nice to give it back to someone who actually fucking understands the movies and what they are. I'm hoping it turns out great answers some questions, and even poses some new ones.

    Here's hoping I can add a 5th movie to the yearly watching list.

    --
    oogly boogly!
    1. Re:As someone who... by Mac_8100_g3 · · Score: 0

      Yeah, same here. Saw it in a grand old theater when it was first released... he scared the shit out of me with that movie. I drove all the way back home from Parma looking over my shoulder (it was after midnight). I've been waiting for this prequel for a long time. Thanks Ridley!

      --
      My peace of mind does not depend on /. karma
  45. Yeah,,,too bad... by LibertineR · · Score: 1

    she didnt have those big fake boobs during the nightmare scene in Aliens; it was that scene that convinced her to get them. They did wonders for her in Galaxy Quest.

  46. When Ridley Scott was approached by geekoid · · Score: 1

    he only had one thing to say:

    The money comes at night...money.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  47. Oblig by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On Slashdot no on can hear you scream!

  48. sry, can't type today... by Wain13001 · · Score: 1

    make that LV-426...lol

  49. Anyone care to post a link? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone care to post a link?
    I failed to google one =(

  50. I'm scared of prequels. by dalebeer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe because I'm still scarred from the Star Wars Prequels. Though I'd pay to watch Jar Jar get killed by one of em.

  51. Fat defense contracts? by Quila · · Score: 1

    It's obvious from later movies that the company wanted the aliens to get technology to create bio-weapons, clone them as super-solders or something else along those lines.

    It could be argued that the value of the defense contracts outweighed the potential loss of the Nostromo. Or instead of defense contracts they needed the aliens to suppress brewing rebellions potentially threatening very large profit sources.

    As far as sending the Nostromo itself, the need for alien technology could have been time-sensitive and they couldn't afford decades of delay while another recovery crew was sent from Earth.

  52. OT: Reused graphics by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    I just wondered if anybody else noticed that graphics from the spinner flight control system in Blade Runner were reused in the escape pod in Alien.

    1. Re:OT: Reused graphics by verbatim · · Score: 1

      other way around

      --
      Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
  53. And then you die by Snaller · · Score: 1

    miaaauuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuv!

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  54. Alien should've been a one-off. by Nim82 · · Score: 1

    I fear this is simply Ridley wanting to make a quick buck, he's not getting any younger. Had he passionately believed in creating a franchise out of Alien, I don't believe he would've walked away from it so quickly, nor would he have waited 30 years to pick the reigns out of the cesspit. Reality is the series, that should never have been, has hit rock bottom and the suits, that control Genericwood, offered Ridley sufficient lewt to commit him to wiping the slate clean, so they can milk it a bit longer. It's hugely depressing that even a talent such as Ridley Scott can't escape the "Sequel, Prequel or Reboot" bubble they've got going on, but I digress...

    As much as I adore Cameron's film (it's in my top 10), it didn't do anything to add to the original work and departed from the original's artistic vision completely. For all intents and purposes Aliens didn't need Alien. Cameron could have done the same film, with really quite minor changes under it's own banner (and probably wished he had when Alien 3 came along and torpedoed *his* plans for the series, he didn't try to hide his rage either). Indeed, Aliens was simply the result of him wanting to do a big budget war film, but being unable to get funding to do it and Fox wanting to milk the success of Alien (concieved as a one-off). Hitching up his idea to Fox's moneytrain was the result

    Cameron was decent enough not to openly shit all over Scott's work, but he never really intended to follow with the original vision. Aliens was all about him hi-jacking the brand, for his own purposes (for better or worse). He sidelined Giger completely, despite Giger being keen to get involved, having been a key creative element on the original (his involvement went beyond scultping the Alien). Cameron redesigned the xenomorphs and invented the new queen and hive, without consulting Giger. He threw the whole bio-mechanical vision Giger had drawn up for Alien out the window, the "perfect biomechanical stalker" xenomorph went out of the window infavor of "hivemind bug/fodder", Ripley also changed, a lot, etc.

    I won't bother to go into Alien 3 and the abomination that was Ressurection, but they pretty much cement the fact that Alien, the franchise, is pretty much whatever the active director/writer/studios wants it to be, and thus as a series is worthless. Put simply: Unless films (or books, for that matter) are designed, from the outset, to be a series, with a well defined roadmap and the original creative team involved at some level, they really shouldn't get follow ups, particularly not gravedigs decades later. As to wanting to know what how the derelict came to be, etc, whatever happend to having a bit of imagination?

    I'm sure most people have theories as to how events unfolded. This prequel won't reveal the "absolute truth", just some hack's interpretation of what happened, crafted to flog tickets, rather than being what makes sense, or originally intended (original writers aren't involved). For those that lack imagination (the shame): The Dark Horse comics/novels, which had some input from the original writers, dealt with the "Space Jockey" issue decades ago. Their interpretation is no less legit than whatever they cook up for this, imo. 'Canon' means jackshit when a franchise has no firm base and is made up on the fly, by whoever happens to get their dirty fingers on the IP.

  55. We know all the answers. No point. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    Basic human mechanics explain the success and failure of these films.

    1. "Alien". --The alien was a grand mystery, a freaky horror show. It was scary and 'alien' and that was what drew us in and thrilled audiences. We are frightened of things we cannot understand and at the same time drawn toward those things in order to understand them. Basic human survival circuitry in action translated into a box-office success.

    2. "Aliens". --Okay. Now we get it. We understand the basic biology of the "monster" and we're not scared anymore. Well, we're a little scared, but actually, we're also sort of pissed off that we got our asses handed to us the first time and that we screamed like little girls. Fuckin' aliens. I'd like to see how those ugly bastards would stand up against us in a REAL fight, like with grenades and machine guns. (Classic, "Who would win? Spider Man or the Hulk?") Yet again, basic human wiring turned into box-office dollars. (The answer, it turns out is, "We'd stand up remarkably well." --That's why Cameron had to handicap the marines so severely. It really was just a bug hunt gone wrong.)

    3. "Who Cares?" It's just pest control at this point. Not that interesting. Might as well be, "Snakes on a Plane."

    4. "Who Cares Part II". See above.

    5. Bleh. Society has moved on. You're going to have to come up with a new kind of monster if you want to scare/impress audiences today. Nobody has the guts or the brains to do that apparently. --Though that Torchwood production, "Children of Earth", was surprisingly solid. Made me feel kind of sick, but then so did "Alien".

    -FL

  56. OH good! I always wanted to... by aqk · · Score: 0

    Fuck Ridley Scott!
    I always wanted to see Jonesey as a kitten!
    And Sigourney!
    Is she goonna look like.. butch young?
    But it's JonesyI wanna see. Damn! I wanna see that kitten!
    And Alien? Yo momma is ugly. An' eats big people!

  57. Space Jockey? by Terminus32 · · Score: 0

    Does this mean we'll see the origins of the Space Jockey? (And maybe some Predators can be thrown in too for equal measure, hehehe...)

    --
    http://nathanlindsell.blogspot.com/
  58. Another Quote by bi$hop · · Score: 0

    Hudson: "17 days? Hey man, I don't wanna rain on your parade, but we're not gonna last 17 hours. Those things are gonna come in here just like they did before...and they're gonna come in here..."

    Ripley: "Hudson!"

    Hudson: "...and they're gonna come in here, and they're gonna get us!"

    Ripley: "Hudson! This little girl lasted longer than that, with no weapons and no training."

    Hudson: "Why don't you put her in charge?!"

  59. Wil there be Predators? Space Jockeys? by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    Maybe the Predators put those eggs on the SJ ship? Hmm. Would be interesting to see.

    My question.... we had the Pedators weapon... yet hundreds of years in the future we were still shooting bullets?

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  60. Nuke the site from orbit. Only way to be sure. by RogueWarrior65 · · Score: 1

    I'll tell you why this is going to suck. Because when Alien and Aliens came out, visual effects were raw and relatively unused compared to today. People went in the theatre expecting something cheesy but got blown away by the coolness of it all. Now, people go in knowing to expect high-end CGI. It's the same feeling I have for G.I. Joe. The point was made that people are poo-pooing GI Joe when few people outside the studio have seen it. True but what I see in the trailer is bullsh*t physics. It's the same reason I think that all comic-book-turned-movies suck. Show me something I could believe actually happens.

  61. Hope he threw some money at SF Perry by smchris · · Score: 1

    The A v. P books are pretty good. I had such a vision in my mind of what an A v. P movie could be like and the actual products were such steaming piles of dog shit, I can't think of a greater contrast. I think there can be life left in the series but it better be good to wash away the stink of some of the later attempts.
     

  62. alien is great but the thing is greater by stewski · · Score: 1

    the thing > ailen

  63. Alien Dentist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    I had been hoping for this I figure it's high time the ALIEN visited the Dentist ?!?!?!

    The Rippley character could be the HOT dental assistent !!!

    The ALIEN is hatched out in an millitary lab, Ripply takes him to the base dentist when he develops his first tooth ache.

    First the denist breaks all his human designed tools on the ALIENS teeth.

    Ripply has sex with the ALIEN !!

    The dentist locks down the ALIEN and pulls out a government issue prototype plasma laser, the ALIEN struggles ...

    Ripply gets HOT and has sex with the ALIEN !

    The dentist discovers the ALIEN has more teath in it's URANIS and starts working there ...

    Ripply gets REALLY EXCITED and has sex with the ALIEN ...

  64. Giger is my only hope by UBfusion · · Score: 1

    IMHO 'Alien' without Giger's vision would be just another scary teen movie with at most one lousy sequel.

    I don't know if Hollywood (or even the whole history of Cinema) has ever seen a better Concept Designer. Look up Giger's works, they extend beyond the Big Bang. Look at the space and spaces, the female deities of death, their copulations with the unnamed and unspeakable. The colourless colours. The silence of aeons. The waves of emptiness. The void in the vastness. Just looking at his works and attempting to describe them will make a poet out of you. A dark poet that is, in the vein of Poe and Lovecraft and Bradbury.

    We were very lucky that Alien was done in 1979. Today it would be totally illegal to produce such a movie: it addresses peoples' and societies' dark side, the unconscious buried both in each living cell and in the collective (un)consciousness, this making it equivalent to terrorism.

    The Alien prequel will have to be "legal", "politically correct" and "viable". So don't be surprised if you see a love story plot in it: the producers always reserve the right to make it appealing to your significant other (reminds you of anything?).

  65. Aha by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 1

    So that's how they cut the power. They're not just animals.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump