Slashdot Mirror


Nissan Gives Electric Cars Blade Runner Audio Effect

mateuscb writes "A campaign backed by automakers and some lawmakers to make electric or hybrid cars noisier in a bid to increase safety for pedestrians and cyclists has taken a strange, Blade Runner-type twist. Nissan sound engineers have announced that the Leaf electric car set for release next year will emit a 'beautiful and futuristic' noise similar to the sound of flying cars — or 'spinners' — that buzz around 2019 Los Angeles in Ridley Scott's dystopian thriller based on a Philip K. Dick science fiction novel."

553 comments

  1. But... by e4g4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...one of the nice things about electric cars is that they're so quiet. Can you turn the sound off?

    --
    The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources. - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:But... by mrmeval · · Score: 4, Funny

      I will change it to a ominous hum.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    2. Re:But... by rvw · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...one of the nice things about electric cars is that they're so quiet. Can you turn the sound off?

      By then we will not download ringtones anymore, but cartones. Think of the possibilities! Make your Focus sound like a Ferrari, make it swing like Michael Jackson. Living next to the highway will be very entertaining.

    3. Re:But... by thermopile · · Score: 4, Funny
      If it sounds like what I think it's going to sound like, I sure hope you can turn the sound off. This youtube link appears to be what the Spinners sound like. Ick; it's cheesy electro-techno.

      I mean, seriously, a "whooshing" sound would be more credible. A soundtrack is too garish.

      --

      "Diplomacy is something you do until you find a rock." --Richard Pound

    4. Re:But... by prof187 · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the article, the sound is supposed to turn off after the car reaches 12 mph because at that point they say the tire noise is enough to let you be able to hear it adequately.

      --

      My other sig is an import.
    5. Re:But... by scottrocket · · Score: 1, Insightful

      ... or only have it come on, when a sensor(s) actually detect a human/animal nearby (visually, thermally etc.).

    6. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tie Fighter anyone?

    7. Re:But... by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your comment ridicules itself.

    8. Re:But... by Jurily · · Score: 4, Funny

      Living next to the highway will be very entertaining.

      Someone at RIAA just had a great idea.

    9. Re:But... by dotgain · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But at TFS says, it's a 'safety feature', I'd imagine you could 'turn it off' about as easily as the airbags or that thing that beeps when you're in reverse, and that's not without messing with wiring.

    10. Re:But... by MouseR · · Score: 1, Funny

      Next we'll have the kiddie ring tones and the nerdy Phytonesque "Run Away!!! Run Away!!!".

      Greatâ¦

    11. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real problem is:

      Does it run Linux?

    12. Re:But... by gringofrijolero · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, This is what The Spinners sound like. However my car will sound like this.

      --
      Todos mis movimientos están friamente calculados
    13. Re:But... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      If my car has to make such a noise; I'll load my car up with Norman Martin's "The Song That Never Ends", and that's what the Pedestrians will get to hear.

      This is the song that doesn't end,
      Yes, it goes on and on, my friend.
      Some people started singing it, not knowing what it was,
      and they'll continue singing it forever just
      because...

    14. Re:But... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2

      I will change it to a ominous hum.

      And some giggling teenager will change it to a loud burping noise.

    15. Re:But... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Ummm, that's the soundtrack to Bladerunner.

      --
      No sig today...
    16. Re:But... by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      > ...one of the nice things about electric cars is that they're so quiet.

      It depends on the point of view and amount of noise.

      > Can you turn the sound off?

      Maybe not. In Japan, a law has been discussed, which would require cars to make some sound, as there were some accidents involving hybrid cars, which were too silent.
      Streets in resedential areas in Japan can be quite narrow with buildings close to both sides. So cars are driving relatively slow and you
      can't look very far around the corners of a crossing. You will usually hear a car before you see it. Also for visually impaired people,
      it may be the sole mean of avoiding cars.

      That is the motivation behind this development. The car maker isn't doing it just for fun.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    17. Re:But... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ... or only have it come on, when a sensor(s) actually detect a human/animal nearby (visually, thermally etc.).

      So you're taking a proposed new feature that'd cost maybe 10 or 20 bucks to incorporate into the car, and bumping it up so it'll add a few thousand to the cost of the vehicle? Brilliant!

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    18. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I'd heard about these before, though not necessarily Nissan but this idea, and it's supposed to be forward-directed noise that's barely audible, if at all, in the cabin.

    19. Re:But... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      I will change it to a ominous hum.

      How about a cheerful hum? Like "Sunshine on My Shoulder?"

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    20. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If cars will make extra noise, then I want a tirebell for my bicycle. They are banned in Germany for noise pollution reasons. Bicycles are only allowed a measly 2.4W headlight, while cars use two 55W bulbs.

    21. Re:But... by nametaken · · Score: 5, Funny

      More like an erection.

    22. Re:But... by paeanblack · · Score: 5, Informative

      But at TFS says, it's a 'safety feature', I'd imagine you could 'turn it off' about as easily as the airbags or that thing that beeps when you're in reverse, and that's not without messing with wiring.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_flag_laws

      These proposals are just as idiotic.

      It's the drivers' responsibility to maintain control of their vehicles and be cognizant of sudden dangers in the street. Any attempts delegate this responsibility onto pedestrians, wildlife, and falling trees are completely retarded.

    23. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...one of the nice things about electric cars is that they're so quiet. Can you turn the sound off?

      Most cyclists and pedestrians would prefer that the sound be forced to stay on.
      It's nice to have some warning when a tonne of steel is rolling towards you at 50kph.

    24. Re:But... by buswolley · · Score: 1

      I do not like noise pollution..but... we depend on our ears to hear dangers that we dont see with or eyes. We need some kind of cue that a car parked in a lot, is a possible moving object.

      --

      A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

    25. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Can't they just make it illegal to operate an electric car between 1 mph and 12 mph?

    26. Re:But... by Deanalator · · Score: 1

      Furthermore I'm sure they are going to start requiring bicyclists to clip baseball cards to their back wheels.

    27. Re:But... by Macrat · · Score: 1

      Also for visually impaired people, it may be the sole mean of avoiding cars.

      And for the deaf people?

    28. Re:But... by johnshirley · · Score: 1

      If you can't turn it off, I'm sure a pair of wire cutters will solve the problem: high-tech annoyance, meet low-tech solution.

    29. Re:But... by mick88 · · Score: 1

      Well, with most hybrids, the electric motor actually provides the most benefits between 1-12 mph. A lot of fuel is generally wasted getting a car from - 15 mph & that's why how hybrids are able to save on consumption.

      So killing the motor at those speeds would really render a lot of hybrids less efficient.

      --
      I created this account just so I could comment on this story
    30. Re:But... by NewbieProgrammerMan · · Score: 1

      "Quit touching my junk, pervert!"
      "Quit touching my junk, pervert!"
      "Quit touching my junk, pervert!"

      --
      [b.belong('us') for b in bases if b.owner() == 'you']
    31. Re:But... by Yaos · · Score: 1

      One of the nice things about this article is that it tells you. Can you read it?

    32. Re:But... by vigilology · · Score: 5, Funny

      Speaking of whooshes...

    33. Re:But... by Main+Gauche · · Score: 1

      And this, boys and girls, was the story of how "*boing*" became the first copyrighted cartone.

    34. Re:But... by Animaether · · Score: 2, Informative

      Forget the RIAA... ASCAP will be charging car owners the performance fee.

      Didn't some ASCAP-alike company try that with ringtones some time ago? Oh wait.. that -was- ASCAP.
      http://news.slashdot.org/story/09/06/22/225207/ASCAP-Wants-To-Be-Paid-When-Your-Phone-Rings

    35. Re:But... by dotgain · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree completely, and enclosed the term 'safety feature' in quotes primarily to imply my cringing as I typed it.

    36. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never underestimate people's need to bitch and moan.

      I remember growing up, all the old farts bitching about how loud cars where. Now they bitch about how electric cars/hybrids are too quiet.

    37. Re:But... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Same thing for those types.

      (Yes, their lawsuit fetish is also very strange to me.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    38. Re:But... by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

      I think you meant Pythonesque.

      I used to use that as a ring tone.

      Now I use the "Carls Jr. - Fuck you - I'm eating" for a rt.

      It was somewhat amusing when my phone started going off during a meeting the other day.

    39. Re:But... by sukotto · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll just have it emit whatever's playing on my stereo.
      If I'm not playing anything, well then the choices are endless aren't they?
      Tie fighter? Popcorn popping? Porn sounds? Crying baby? Lightsaber hum? Maniacal laughter?
      Hell, I could have a different sound every day!

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    40. Re:But... by Denihil · · Score: 1

      I can see the 30 second promo clips of 50 cent playing on cars driving past....ugh. Now there's a valid reason for self-euthanizing if I've ever heard one.

      --
      WÌÌfÍ--ÍSÌÒÍ...Í...ÌHÌÍfÍÍÍ--ÍÍÍ
    41. Re:But... by Knuckles · · Score: 2, Informative

      Too late. This is already part of Shai Agassi's plan according to an interview with him that I read somewhere (it's not mentioned in the linked article; I seem to remember the trademark may be "drive sounds".)

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    42. Re:But... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      How about the Jetson's car? A kind of spanish-"R"-rolling bird chirp:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yjy-fnsmWR4

    43. Re:But... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Car-Tunes? Where've I heard that before?

    44. Re:But... by xenophrak · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Contrary to popular belief, life is not a bitch. It is far far worse.
    45. Re:But... by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I used to drive a Mazda RX2, which was much quieter than the average car, and it was funny to drive up behind pedestrians walking down the middle of a side street or someone on a bicycle before they realized there was a car behind them. So, why didn't someone have this bright idea then? Could it be because these new quieter cars are electric?

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    46. Re:But... by misnohmer · · Score: 1

      So basically all cars will blast out a sound of user's choice? Maybe to save cost, the manufacturer will simply hook-up a loud speaker to your stereo without volume control (set only to the mandated decibels) and with an annoying "pause/off" sound. Now, imagine being stuck in traffic where every car is blasting out their choice of music. This brings the "highway noise pollution" in cities to a whole new level?

    47. Re:But... by SteveFoerster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's the drivers' responsibility to maintain control of their vehicles and be cognizant of sudden dangers in the street. Any attempts delegate this responsibility onto pedestrians, wildlife, and falling trees are completely retarded.

      I agree that this is the driver's responsibility, but considering we're talking about stopping people from getting smooshed by cars, is alerting pedestrians as a sort of back up system really that objectionable?

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    48. Re:But... by Craevenwulfe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Try being blind and then guessing when it's safe to cross the road...

    49. Re:But... by speedtux · · Score: 1

      It's the drivers' responsibility to maintain control of their vehicles and be cognizant of sudden dangers in the street.

      It's everybody's responsibility to avoid accidents, not just the drivers of automobiles. Pedestrians and bicyclist can cause accidents, can be at fault in accidents, and can (and should) be held legally responsible for their actions just as much as everybody else. You don't get a get-out-of-jail-free card just because you choose one mode of transportation over another.

    50. Re:But... by thetartanavenger · · Score: 1

      It's the drivers' responsibility to maintain control of their vehicles and be cognizant of sudden dangers in the street. Any attempts delegate this responsibility onto pedestrians, wildlife, and falling trees are completely retarded.

      This isn't delegating responsibility, this is alerting a pedestrian when the idiot drunk driver is coming towards you at excessive speed. Have you seriously never encountered an irresponsible driver?

      And whatever happened to stop, look and listen?

      --
      Who need's speling and grammar?
    51. Re:But... by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      As much as on microwave ovens, etc.

      I.e: not.

      Actually there have been talks about lwas (think about the children).

      We fubared to "beep", "whuii", etc sounds which gives headache ...

    52. Re:But... by chiguy · · Score: 1

      It's a classic fallacy: someone else should do this so that I don't have to worry about that.

      In this case, you're saying the driver is responsible for not steamrolling people, therefore they shouldn't be forced to warn pedestrians of their presence.

      But it's not an either/or situation. It can be the driver's responsibility, but given that there exists irresponsible drivers, it's probably a good idea to give pedestrians additional cues so that they can avoid risky situations.

      It reminds of the students in college towns who step out in front of moving traffic because the law says drivers must stop for pedestrians. Sure, it's the responsibility of the drivers to see that you're in the crosswalk and stop. But there are a lot of distracted drivers out there. Playing chicken with them just doesn't seem worth the thrill.

      --
      passetspike!
    53. Re:But... by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      Looks like most of the replies already made the points I was going to make, so all I have left is an ad hominem attack. I don't see much personal info in your profile, so could you help me out to get me started?

    54. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      (Where's Philip K Dickhead chiming in when you need him?! [http://slashdot.org/~Philip+K+Dickhead/])

      When we had Dick, we had a genius. Unfortunately, there's no more Dick around now, but at least we have some amazing memories. True, we sometimes saw some amazing characters, and then there was little performance on the Dick plotlines; other times, we had an amazing buildup by Dick, but no real delivery at the climax.

      All of his books are worth reading, even when Dick coming through just didn't happen as hoped. Some adaptations have come close, but no film of the work of Dick has ever really got me as excited as I'd hoped. ... dammit, get your minds out of the gutter! We lost a very amazing and insightful writer when Dick was withdrawn from us. There is a moving, metal likeness [see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_K._Dick#Death%5D, but we still do not have a real Dick, unfortunately.

      I'm going to Hell for this post. Oh well, maybe I'll encounter the amazing Dick on my way through Death's door...

    55. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Works differently in India. If you cannot shed some responsibility to the pedestrians, you will be immobile.

      - Ramanujam

    56. Re:But... by selven · · Score: 1

      We could add beeping noises for when the light turns green / finish but don't start / red.

    57. Re:But... by cbreak · · Score: 1
    58. Re:But... by cbreak · · Score: 1

      Considering a car that doesn't move does not use any energy, it's probably quite efficient.

    59. Re:But... by selven · · Score: 1

      No car will ever go beyond 0.99 mph then. And what about the cars that are moving when this law is enacted? Something like this?

    60. Re:But... by ZygnuX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes because we know a driver never speeds past a red light, ever.

    61. Re:But... by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      Nah, this is more like it

      --
      What?
    62. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine sounds like an old Volkswagen Vanagon... oh wait, it is a Vanagon.

    63. Re:But... by rantingkitten · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wildlife and falling trees don't know what cars are. People do. I don't care that the law says pedestrians have the right of way -- the laws of physics override the laws of man, and physics tells us that a 150 fleshbag is not going to win against a three-ton piece of steel going 40mph. In other words, when your mother taught you don't step out into traffic she was right.

      To me it is absolutely the responsibility of the pedestrian to be aware of cars and not walk out into the street hoping everyone will notice or be able to stop in time. Putting the onus on the driver to be able to hit the anchors and come to a dead stop in twenty feet just because some asshole saunterd out into the road because "the law" says he's allowed is absolutely ridiculous.

      So please, enlighten us as to why you think the pedestrian shouldn't have any responsibility. I say it's the pedestrian's job to do that other thing our mothers taught us: Look both ways before crossing the street, and if cars are coming, don't walk until they're gone. It's not my job as a driver to keep idiots safe.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    64. Re:But... by selven · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That situation would be likely to kill a seeing person as well.

    65. Re:But... by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I'm willing to bet the wheels on pavement are enough of a sound for someone who is constantly using hearing to find out what is going on around them.

      I think it's the people that don't notice sound unless they are being careless, and it is a loud one that we are trying to protect with this law.

      Actually it is probably the insurance companies that would be paying for their medical care that are most likely the gain.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    66. Re:But... by AvitarX · · Score: 2, Interesting

      More likely because they are main stream and in a growing market.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    67. Re:But... by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      You're right, but in bike/person vs. car, the car wins according to physics. If you're on a bike or on foot and trust a driver any more than you have to, you're insane.

      Bad drivers should still be held fully responsible, but an injury or death caused by a bad driver is a preventable incident.

    68. Re:But... by Trahloc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm no. I don't know about you but I can distinguish the difference between a car slowing down and one gunning it even if I'm blasting music over headphones. How often do you see a pedestrian look straight at you when their about to get the walk signal to make sure your not going to plow right over them, a blind person can't do that.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    69. Re:But... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      That situation would be likely to kill a seeing person as well.

      A seeing person that has his eyes closed, maybe. Cars should make noise; not all intersections have streetlights.

    70. Re:But... by smoker2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Aah the "I've got a bigger dick than you" argument. sorry, you lose. Pedestrians, that is to say, everybody on the planet, have more rights than assholes in cars. The slower, less manoeuvrable vehicle always has right of way. Or do you think you have the right to mow people down because you're late for a meeting ?

      It IS your job to keep other people safe from your machine. If you bumped into them in person, no big deal - if you hit them with your car, it's YOUR CAR ! YOU are legally in control (supposedly). This is why I hate car drivers. They think they own the fucking planet.

    71. Re:But... by Trahloc · · Score: 1

      Yes, the fact that they didn't put it in effect on your rx2 doesn't mean its a bad idea. We use to not require seat belts either and most folks think those are a good idea, specially if they've ever been in an accident without them. I've bounced around in a car so I'm in that camp.

      --
      The Goal: A long simple life filled with many complex toys.
    72. Re:But... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Pedestrians cant even hear the sound of a diesel engine, what makes Nissan think they are going hear an electric. Then you have the cry babies who complain about traffic noise after choosing to live on a major highway.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    73. Re:But... by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      ... because being hit by a cyclist is so the same as being hit by 2 tonnes of steel. Maybe the sound should reflect the person drivings ego, kinda like " MeeeeeEEEEEEE, MeeeeeeeEEEEEEE" !

    74. Re:But... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      So you would be like every other pedestrian.

      I drive around the city every day and it's amasing how desperate people are to get the the coffee shop, they will risk life and limb to get there 20seconds faster.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    75. Re:But... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      When accompanied by a red, I tend to slow down.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    76. Re:But... by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      When accompanied by a red, I tend to slow down.

      I know when I take reds I tend to slow down too.

    77. Re:But... by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      I meant to say blue

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    78. Re:But... by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wheels on asphalt are astonishingly quiet. Have a friend try it out on you if you don't believe me - run a car up a small incline, then put it in neutral and turn off the engine. Close your eyes, tell him to go, and open your eyes when you can hear it. Do this a block away from a busy street, for added realism. See how close he is.

    79. Re:But... by Burpmaster · · Score: 1

      Yes, saving lives is retarded. I'm sure the families of victims killed by quiet cars will be relieved to know that it's somebody else's fault.

    80. Re:But... by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm willing to bet the wheels on pavement are enough of a sound for someone who is constantly using hearing to find out what is going on around them.

      I had the experience of being sneaked up on by a Prius on in a narrow street last year. The ground was very clean (none of the loose salt/sand that is often on the roads in the northeast) and its gas engine must have been off-- that vehicle was absolutely silent. I gained an appreciation for the issue of lack of vehicle noise that day. Perhaps at 60mph tires make a noise, but at the low speeds on streets they aren't always discernible.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    81. Re:But... by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And if they're blind?

    82. Re:But... by moortak · · Score: 1

      As a lifelong pedestrian I firmly agree with rantingkitten. People are squishy and cars are not. It is right for drivers to bear the legal responsibility as the more maneuverable vehicle, but pedestrians have more practical responsibility as the ones who are more likely to end up smeared on the pavement. Never put youre life in the hands of random strangers who may not even be aware of your presence if you can avoid it.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    83. Re:But... by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      Can't they just make it illegal to operate an electric car between 1 mph and 12 mph?

      So you are suggest we should enforce the speed equivalent of subduction? Hmm, very interesting, just imagine the possibilities...

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    84. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As my favorite pile of brown goo would say, "Happiness is a warm Strohl Munitions Plasma Cannon"

    85. Re:But... by REggert · · Score: 1

      Also for visually impaired people,
      it may be the sole mean of avoiding cars.

      And for the deaf people?

      I'd imagine that they'd fare the same way they currently do against normal cars.

      --

      cp /dev/zero ~/signature.txt

    86. Re:But... by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 1

      I wish I could play that ominous Jaws sound (cello solo) so that the doppler effect makes it get faster in tempo instead of higher pitched.
      A block away... duhna.......duhna - duhna....
      thirty feet away... duhna-duhna-duhna-duhna!!!
      maybe need radar and selective speakers to send the right signal to everyone... and get a ticket for noise because it's not gonna be any good unless it's loud enough to scare them back onto the sidewalk... sigh...
      One can dream.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    87. Re:But... by selven · · Score: 1

      A seeing person that's:

      1) Reading a book
      2) Checking something in his bag/wallet/satchel
      3) Just looking forward for whatever/no reason
      4) The intersection in question features a turn, so you can't see beyond 50 metres, and the person is looking the other way for those two seconds

    88. Re:But... by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      I've got Mr. T as a ringtone.

      Nothing gets your attention like Mr. T shouting: "Ring Ring Sucka!... Your phone's ringin' fool. Your PHONE!... I Pity da foo dat don't answer their phone!... I Got no time fo da jibba jabba, but you do. SO PICK IT UP!"

      Hmm. Maybe Mr. T can make a "Car tone". "Beep beep Sucka! Outta da way Fool! I Pity da Fool dat gets in mah way!"

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    89. Re:But... by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Funny

      I want the Jaws theme music.

      --
      I hate printers.
    90. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://schlockmercenary.com/

    91. Re:But... by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, he's saving oxygen, the oxygen consumed by his lungs during a ride is vastly less than the oxygen consumed by an internal combustion engine over the same distance. It also does not produce carbon monoxide or any of the other toxic gasses that engines do.

      Before you retort that TFA is about electric cars, please tell us all if *you* drive an electric car.

      --
      I hate printers.
    92. Re:But... by drik00 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There's two big problems with this though... first, the majority of the sound that comes from a moving car is from the tires (I didn't believe it at first, but roll you window down and listen some time), so this whole point seems moot. Second, do we really want the sound of thousands of Jetsons' cars on a crowded 5pm traffic jam? Expect road rage incidents to go through the roof.

      J

      --
      Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    93. Re:But... by dougmc · · Score: 1
      Considering that efficiency is probably measured in distance moved divided by energy used, it's efficiency rating is probably OP{OIP{{{{{DIVISION BY ZERO ERROR

      Oh wait, the A/C, radio, lights, etc. are on, so the energy used isn't zero. So it's zero divided by some positive value. So the efficiency is zero if it's not moving.

    94. Re:But... by dougmc · · Score: 1
      People have been killed by collisions with bicycles. Granted, the cyclist is usually hauling ass when it happens, and it's quite rare, but it's not unheard of. That said, it's still very rare, and most cyclists are pretty careful of hitting pedestrians, so I think the world will survive if cyclists don't have mandatory cards in their spokes.

      As for the ego, are you referring to the motorists or the cyclists ? :)

    95. Re:But... by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some noise is needed, because pedestrians are so stupid.

      So instead of taking the opportunity to quiet our cities, which are an absolute noise nightmare, we are going to legislate more noise. Can you imagine a stream of bumper to bumper traffic and the noise that would create?

      Wouldn't it be easier for the blind or deaf to carry s little 360 degree Doppler radar which would squeal or vibrate when something is approaching faster then their gate?

      Wouldn't that make more sense than making city environments more unpleasant for every one else?

      You could fund this with gas/battery tax revenues. You could build it into mp3 players.

      Such a device will work for cyclists as well as pedestrians.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    96. Re:But... by 4181 · · Score: 1

      5) Texting; but then again, do we care?

    97. Re:But... by dotgain · · Score: 1

      And whatever happened to stop, look and listen?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmj2NV8ulSs

    98. Re:But... by rtb61 · · Score: 0

      Road tyre noise. While reversing vehicles can be pretty quite, cars driving down the road at normal speed are not. When all vehicles are electric the amount of background noise in dramatically diminish, as such road tyre noise will become far more audible. The noise is nothing more than pollution, marketing pollution to be exact. About having cars going down roads each with a manufacturer distinct sound, marketing down every street they travel, advertising that manufacturer. They might as well be screaming, buy ford, buy ford, buy food or as in this case buy Nissan, buy Nissan, buy Nissan.

      Any politician who doesn't think this is straight up marketing noise pollution is either stupid or corrupt or possibly even both. Now if you are serious about blind people, cars could emit an ultrasonic pulse, detectors for white could be built into the white canes and could detect proximity, speed and direction of travel, all completely absent of marketing distinctiveness.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    99. Re:But... by Gerzel · · Score: 1

      Ironically that has been cited by the autoindustry as a problem of electric cars. They don't make the right engine sounds and the claim often was that the lack of such sounds would mean that consumers wouldn't buy the electric cars.

    100. Re:But... by CheeseTroll · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As someone who used to commute via bike, I say it's pretty freaky having a hybrid come whooshing by, even if it's in a different lane. Almost as bad as a city bus, which has it's engine in the back so you don't hear it until the bus is practically on top of you. A little audible warning would be nice. It doesn't need to sound like a Harley to be effective.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    101. Re:But... by AngryNick · · Score: 2, Informative

      The first part of the Blade Runner trailer contains the "spinner" whooshing sound without the theme music. Imagining a future with traffic jams of bees make me want to invest in noise canceling technology.

    102. Re:But... by khchung · · Score: 0

      I don't care that the law says pedestrians have the right of way

      This is one of a big mystery for me, not being a USian.

      Do pedestrians really always have the right of way in the US? You mean I can just step out blindly into a road, and if a car hits me, it is automatically his fault? If so, it simply does not make sense!

      --
      Oliver.
    103. Re:But... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

      a three-ton piece of steel going 40mph

      Let me know when I can buy a 6000 pound hybrid or electric car. That would be sweet!

      --
      This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
    104. Re:But... by delysid-x · · Score: 1

      I walk around with my headphones on anyway, so I don't hear street noise anyway. All the crosswalks here make coocoo and chirp chirp sounds for the blind people. Really annoying.

    105. Re:But... by Aranykai · · Score: 1

      You wont hear an electric car coming at 25 miles if the road is smooth. A pulse and alerter is not only an additional monetary burden on manufacturers but would cost blind people and tax payers as well. Also, I'm really looking forward to how your explanation of how a detector is going to relay proximity, speed and direction of travel anywhere close to the ability of the human ear.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    106. Re:But... by budgenator · · Score: 1

      This is one of a big mystery for me, not being a USian.

      Do pedestrians really always have the right of way in the US? You mean I can just step out blindly into a road, and if a car hits me, it is automatically his fault? If so, it simply does not make sense!

      Yes pedestrians always have the right of way in the US, if a drive hits a pedestrian it's the driver's fault. Even if the pedestrian is crossing the street illegally he still has the right of way, if the pedestrian is hit when illegally crossing the street both the driver and the pedestrian may be ticketed. Pedestrians that assume that cars will yield the right of way are frequently hit, European drivers are far more likely to yield to pedestrians than US drivers.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    107. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some pedestrians are blind. Also, in my country if a pedestrians steps onto the road the law says you must yield to them. Precisely because of the laws of physics you cited. A pedestrian has no chance against a moving vehicle; humans are fragile. Maybe try thinking outside the box instead of being an asshole.

    108. Re:But... by buchner.johannes · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh great. Ring^W Car-tones you can download, just what we needed. This is going to be annoying ...

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    109. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm legally blind, I have almost been hit twice by super quiet electric cars this year. I check for oncoming cars as best I can when crossing the street, and part of that is listening for them. This is a desperately needed safety feature, especially since drivers in my area don't seem to give a sh*t about pedestrians or stop signs.

    110. Re:But... by rickkw · · Score: 1

      Unless Nissan ties the sound wire to the ignition, I am CERTAIN that people will find which wire to cut to shut it up.

    111. Re:But... by paeanblack · · Score: 4, Informative

      Do pedestrians really always have the right of way in the US?

      There are no national traffic enforcement laws in the US; each individual state sets their own. The national government only provides financial incentives for the states' laws to meet certain criteria.

      Pedestrian right-of-way laws vary considerably across the country and are a dissonant mix of historic inertia and regional practicality. In Boston or New Orleans, jaywalking is common and pedestrians routinely cross streets where and when they choose. The local courts will invariably find the driver at fault. In Washington DC or New York, jaywalking laws are actually enforced. In Salt Lake City or San Diego, jaywalking is extremely rare and drivers are given more leniency in the courts.

      A few things are fairly universal:
      -For the most part, pedestrians have the absolute right-of-way, anytime and anywhere.
      -If you hit somebody near a school, a playground, or a school bus, you will always be at fault, under the assumption that you were driving too fast to stop for a child.
      -If the pedestrian is actually trying to be hit (i.e. suicide attempt/insurance fraud...not just crossing recklessly), the driver is generally not liable.
      -Striking a pedestrian on a limited access highway where they are not allowed will usually result in both parties being held responsible.

      As a foreigner driving in the US, don't make any assumptions about pedestrian rights-of-way until you are familiar with the local laws.

    112. Re:But... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps at 60mph tires make a noise, but at the low speeds on streets they aren't always discernible.

      Nissan deems that at 12 mph the tires are loud enough to turn the sound off. Tires are more than audible if you are on the sidewalk of a road where cars are moving at 30 mph. Have you ever had a 60 mph car go by you at close range? It is incredibly loud. Like, so loud you wish it was electric.

      But why does the car need to have an audible warning? Think about how much this is going to cost if it is mandatory on every car... Maybe they can make a radar system for disabled people that warns them when they are standing in front of an approaching car-sized object. If they made it small enough, Apple could incorporate it into their iPods. Then all the retards who can hear, but try to cross the street with their headphones might have a chance too!

    113. Re:But... by Hittman · · Score: 1

      Of course it's the responsibility of the pedestrian to be aware, but everyone of us has, at some time in our life, been distracted, lost in thought, involved in a conversation, watching that hot chick across the street, etc. and stepped into the street when we shouldn't have, heard the danger approaching and saved ourselves. It happens, we're human.

      OTOH, I'm not all that keen on congress making laws, and they're bound to screw this one up and demand something that's either ineffective or extremely annoying.

    114. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know that this isn't going to matter for the sake of argument or anything, but as a runner living in a major city (NYC), I have to say that although I do not step into traffic (or for that much cross when there is a stop signal) there are quite a few drivers who are more than willing do drive through said crosswalks, lights, and stop signs at full speed without giving a second thought to pedestrians. With an ambient noise makeup that tends to drown out cars, etc. and moving at a clip myself, it would be nice to have some sort of warning if possible. I'm all for reducing noise pollution and all, but I'm not sure if a pedestrian can be held at fault when someone come barreling down in a hurry. Yes, everyone should take their fair share of responsibility, but if you are driving a machined that weighs in excess of 13 times human body weight, then, yeah. I would say you have a lot more responsibility on your shoulders than I. If I run into somebody running, a worst a broken limb, maybe a few bruises. If I hit somebody with a car, the injuries are exponential.

    115. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Walking is a right, driving is a privilege.

    116. Re:But... by rubi · · Score: 1

      The theme from JAWS!, pedestrians beware!

    117. Re:But... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      I had the experience of being sneaked up on by a Prius on in a narrow street last year.

      My mom was walking in a parking lot 6 months ago and a Prius backing out of a parking spot hit her, sending her to the hospital. A nader-beeper for reverse gear would probably have avoided the accident.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    118. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're taking a proposed new feature that'd cost maybe 10 or 20 bucks to incorporate into the car, and bumping it up so it'll add a few thousand to the cost of the vehicle? Brilliant!

      I've got one that came with my car, it's called the horn. Now drive or get off the damn road, asshole!

    119. Re:But... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Think about how much this is going to cost if it is mandatory on every car...

      Maybe $25 per vehicle? Honestly, a low-fidelity speaker is not expensive to produce.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    120. Re:But... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Playing chicken with them just doesn't seem worth the thrill.

      About 25 years ago when I was living in Paris, it was generally held that cars were not actually required to stop for pedestrians at crosswalks; these were simply an indication of where it was likely that someone would want to cross. (The actual law said something quite different, but the French are notoriously bloody-minded.)

      So a common way of approaching the matter was to step out in front of a (hopefully slowly-)moving car and slap its bonnet (hood) hard, scaring the crap out of the driver. Yes, playing chicken can be fun, but I can't say I recommend it for those who need crutches to walk. :-)

    121. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      6) ???
      7) Profit!

    122. Re:But... by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      By then we will not download ringtones anymore, but cartones. Think of the possibilities! .

      I'll have a Model A Ford, complete with awooga horn.

      Or perhaps a Peterbuilt with a broken muffler.

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    123. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cars more maneuverable? Don't make me laugh. Compare acceleration and deceleration times, turning radius (zero on a pedestrian!), size and reaction times. The pedestrian is much more maneuverable.

    124. Re:But... by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

      Maybe they can make a radar system for disabled people that warns them when they are standing in front of an approaching car-sized object.

      So they would also be warned at every approach of my mother-in-law.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    125. Re:But... by MasterOfCeremonies · · Score: 1

      I vote that instead we make blind people wear red flashing lights on their heads so electric car drivers will be able to spot them more easily as they nonchalantly amble into the road.

    126. Re:But... by kdemetter · · Score: 1

      That's true, but i doubt that a car who speeds past a red light , is going to take the time to look at anyone.
      And it's not always when you are just crossing over either. I was had a car nearly drive me off the road , when i was almost at the end ( so it was already red for a while ).

    127. Re:But... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      In high levels O2 can

      * Cause increased fire risk
      * React to produce CO2, a dangerous greenhouse gas
      * Kill anaerobic bacteria
      * Oxygen toxicity can KILL humans

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxygen_toxicity#Classification

      I personally minimize the risk by breathing bottled air, consisting of 80% Nitrogen, an inert and harmless gas.

      Right now, thanks to lobbying from Big Forestry O2 emissions are totally unregulated. It is time for the EPA to ban O2 as a pollutant, just like CO2.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    128. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm... I wonder if they'll make it so you can change it on the fly to suit your driving mood?

      Some more ideas...

      Delorean from Back To The Future
      K.I.T.T.'s scanner noise from Knight Rider
      That one ominous abient sound effect from the first Terminator movie
      Old Warner Brother's Cartoon "Jalopy" sound effect
      Cartoon squeaky baby buggy noise
      Airwolf sound effect (or soundtrack)
      Popcorn by Hot Butter (because it will drive people crazy after it gets stuck in their heads)
      Powerhouse (remember Wile E. Coyote?)
      Hanna Barbara's Speed Buggy
      Tocatta and Fuge in D minor (Either original classical or in techno remix Gyruss-soundtrack like versions)
      Ride of the Valyries
      William Tell Overature

      And I'm sure there's more, but I'm out for now.

    129. Re:But... by itsthebin · · Score: 1

      the voice recording for reversing alarms on chinese commercial vehicles is slightly humourous

      it is a woman saying something like " excuse me , I am reversing "

      I had thought about making a ring tone out of it

      --
      ...I obey the laws of physics....
    130. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      o... so that's why we don't have stops lights, why we don't crash test cars etc...

      point is: this is done to prevent idiots from crashing into your car without even realizing it.

      what, you want to drive at 10km/h in a city just becouse some idiot is too used to listen to the usual "wrooom" sound?

    131. Re:But... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      On such intersections zebra crossings are used, and pedestrians have got a right of way on them.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    132. Re:But... by Yetihehe · · Score: 1

      So it's her fault? I'm always looking around when I'm backing out, if I don't see everything clearly (like when someone has darkened windows) I'm just backing up very slowly so everyone can see what I'm doing.

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
    133. Re:But... by jwdb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you step out on to the crosswalk distractedly, it's my responsibility as a driver to stop. I've never had a problem doing this. And if I'm so close that I can't stop for the crosswalk, that means I'll be through it before the pedestrian has walked out past the parked cars. It's my duty as a driver to slow down near crosswalks and intersections, in case I need to yield.

      Where I as a driver shouldn't have to be on high alert is in the middle of the road with no crosswalk in sight (excluding school zones, residential streets filled with kids, etc...). Pedestrians have no business jaywalking right in front of cars, even absentmindedly. I can't stop if I'm driving the speed limit and you step out right in front of me where I couldn't have expected you. I assume this was the physics problem gp was referring to.

      So, if you're in the crosswalk, cross with every assurance that I'll make sure I stop in time. If you jaywalk, however, make sure you do it behind me or I'll unavoidably run you over. It's a matter of respecting existing agreements.

    134. Re:But... by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      Also, I'm really looking forward to how your explanation of how a detector is going to relay proximity, speed and direction of travel anywhere close to the ability of the human ear.

      Are you kidding?
      Call me when the computers can even do arithmetic as well as a human!

    135. Re:But... by Idiomatick · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "hit the anchors and come to a dead stop in twenty feet just because some asshole saunterd out into the road because "the law" says he's allowed is absolutely ridiculous."

      Uhhh if he's not jaywalking and reached the corner first and you are at a distance where it is safe for you to stop then yeah.... You really should stop...
      If you are driving at a speed through an intersection where you are unable to stop if something comes out then you are a danger and will hopefully have your license taken before you kill anyone.

      People crossing at the crosswalk aren't idiots. The right of way is NOT determined by who dies or everyone would be driving tanks and walking anywhere would be completely impossible. Main st in my town is a 60zone with lots of cars, the way you are talking you sound like you'd be happy splitting the city into essentially little islands.

    136. Re:But... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      How often do you think blind people will get killed by drivers running red lights that are in electric cars because they are more difficult to hear.
      Only a certain % of ppl get hit each year, a chunk of those people are blind, some of those are hit by electric cars, some are because of ppl running red lights, and very few would be avoided by adding a car noise.

      That works out to a pretty damn small number, maybe 1 in the next 10 years? Chances are the blind guy wont die and the asshole driver will get sued for a million bucks.

      This is a risk I'm willing to take to have technology move forward and DRASTICALLY reduce noise pollution in the city.

    137. Re:But... by mgblst · · Score: 1

      What a joke. Yeah, you have the right to turn the street into a death trap. That is a wonderful thing. Step 2 metres out of my house and I could be dead, and you think this is a reasonable situation to be in.

      Fuck you car drivers.

    138. Re:But... by Phoghat · · Score: 1
      This has been thought of before. I can't remember the source but one car maker wanted to make the car emit the engine sounds of a Ferrari V 12. Sounds like

      Rice Boy Tech to me

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    139. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agreee. walk defensively. Assume they're trying to kill you, not that they are going to stop.

    140. Re:But... by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Try being blind and doing most anything. Not so easy, eh? Sucks for them, but we can't hold back civilization for every corner case. This is obviously an attempt to hold back the electric car. Don't parrot the official line....

    141. Re:But... by MadUndergrad · · Score: 1

      Times the number of cars in this country = ~half a billion dollars.

    142. Re:But... by FlexPlexico · · Score: 1

      Wow, I had no idea it was like that in the US. Over here, if you drive through the zebra crossing while there are people on it, you automatically lose your license for a month. As a pedestrian, you get slapped with a nice fine if you cross the street in an unmarked place. It is however legal to cross by the street corner, as vehicles are supposed to slow down anyway when approaching an intersection, BUT if you get hit by a car you get to pay your own hospital fee and the repairs to the guy's vehicle.

    143. Re:But... by elFarto+the+2nd · · Score: 1

      I'd change it to KIFT from Knight Rider 2000.

    144. Re:But... by bit01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As someone who used to commute via bike, I say it's pretty freaky having a hybrid come whooshing by, even if it's in a different lane. Almost as bad as a city bus, which has it's engine in the back so you don't hear it until the bus is practically on top of you. A little audible warning would be nice. It doesn't need to sound like a Harley to be effective.

      May be better for you to start using a rear view mirror. Just like trucks, cars, motorbikes and mopeds. Or a rear view camera if you want to be high tech. Perhaps with an education campaign. It's crazy to deliberately make noise when cities are already too loud as it is. Particularly in traffic jams or late at night. I'm really looking forward to the day when cities have minimal air pollution and minimal sound pollution.

      ---

      Insisting on absolute safety is for people who don't have the balls to live in the real world.

      -- Mary Shafer, risks researcher, NASA

    145. Re:But... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      For anyone reading this, it is 100% wrong. Pedestrians do not have the right of way when illegally crosing the street. Never. Ever. There was a pedestrian fatality a couple blocks from me this month. The driver wasn't ticketed. The police said they feel bad for the driver because the pedestrian crossed illegally at night not at an intersection and that the car driver did nothing wrong. The pedestrian wasn't ticketed, but being dead, I don't think he would have paid the ticket.

      Now, if you are in a crosswalk, the rules are different, but I know of no place that states the pedestrian has the right of way while illegally jaywalking. If you know of such place, please post a link.

    146. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Almost as bad as a city bus, which has it's engine in the back

      That's the problem - there are many other vehicles on the road that are just as hard to hear. You can't relying on hearing the sound vehicles make to avoid being hit by them.

      Many modern ICE cars are very quiet when their engines are in the low rpms - if you hear them it's more due to the tyre noise.

      The ICE cars are much louder on full throttle, but so far the electric cars I've watched on videos seem to make noise too when on full throttle (the whine of various stuff spinning) - they're just not as loud.

      So I'm not sure if there's a big benefit from having electric cars make artificial noises.

    147. Re:But... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It's the drivers responsibility to not run down drunks, children, drug users and what I can only assume are vast legions of idiots that do not care if they become road kill. I'm not sure that a lack of sound makes things worse. The dozens of people I've had to brake or stop for would have been able to hear me coming if they were paying any sort of attention. The speed limit in my street has been reduced to nearly half of what it was but people are still getting run down on Friday nights.
      It should be a basic in survival tactic in any place with cars, but for some reason a lot of people have managed to ignore it on occasion and still survive to adulthood and scare the crap out of the occassional driver.

    148. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already have that in Australia. Orbital (UK electronic band) even sampled it.

    149. Re:But... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Depends a lot on the tires as well. Cheap ones with a lot of plastic added to the rubber make much more noise than - what I call - proper tires. Nowadays you can even get cheap new cars with "fake" tires.

    150. Re:But... by owlstead · · Score: 1

      This is an opinion and should not be modded informative - interesting maybe, but not informative. I do think that starting with "I've got a bigger dick..." is a proper way to enter an argument but smoker2 has got a valid and more accepted argument and should definitely not be modded troll for it. Moderators seem to have lost their mojo off late.

    151. Re:But... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I personally minimize the risk by breathing bottled air, consisting of 80% Nitrogen, an inert and harmless gas.

      May I recommend that you increase the partial pressure of your dinitrogen environment by moving to a higher pressure environment. The equivalent of 50m of seawater pressure would be adequate.
      "Inert"? Difficult to react would be much more accurate (I must look up the current state of noble gas chemistry; I think compounds of argon are now known, possibly neon, none I have heard of for helium. Yet.)
      "Harmless"? Everything is harmful, at a high enough dose. Paraclesius came out with that one about 500 years ago, and he hasn't been demonstrated to be wrong to date. Unless, of course, some SlashDotty knows better.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    152. Re:But... by dylan_- · · Score: 5, Funny

      And if they're blind?

      Then they really shouldn't be driving at all...

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    153. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if they're blind?

      Then they really shouldn't be driving at all...

      Or walking apparently...

    154. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm going to see them on Friday \o/

    155. Re:But... by ninjeratu · · Score: 1

      No it's not. They don't sound like that since that is the Blade Runner soundtrack. :P http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EvkqEOcHFY8 at 0:30, 1:31 and 2:16 you can hear it.

      --
      /* Time flies like an arrow, but fruit flies like a banana */
    156. Re:But... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      As someone who commutes by foot, I say it's pretty freaky having a bike come whooshing by. Luckily bikes cannot be legally ridden on the pavement any more, but those damn invalid/fat/old person mobiles are still a mostly silent menace to me.

      I think the bottom line is as long as we try to mix different types of traffic in the same space, it's doomed to a certain amount of failure. The question becomes, how acceptable is that amount? We accept that a certain number of people will be killed in road accidents every year, and while of course we try to reduce the number as much as possible we also value the utility of cars more than that number of lost lives. It sounds bad when put like that, but it is none the less true.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    157. Re:But... by jabithew · · Score: 1

      It's not my job as a driver to keep idiots safe.

      Erm, I don't know where you learnt to drive, but I'm currently learning in the UK and I have to say that actually, it is your job. As my instructor commented yesterday, it's better to not crash than to be right.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    158. Re:But... by jabithew · · Score: 2, Informative

      In England we have no jaywalking offence, so if someone crosses the road far enough ahead of you for you to stop, then it is your responsibility not to hit them. Most of our town centre roads are capped at 30mph (20mph around schools), so it's basically the driver's problem.

      Pedestrians have priority at pedestrian crossings when the signals are in their favour, zebra crossings at all times, and at road junctions without crossings if you start crossing before the car turns (this is specifically mentioned in the highway code).

      The exception to this is motorways, where pedestrians aren't allowed at all. This is normally obvious to even the most fatally stupid of Englishmen.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    159. Re:But... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      -For the most part, pedestrians have the absolute right-of-way, anytime and anywhere.

      This isn't true anywhere I've researched. What is true is that you are required to try not to hit them. In general the law requires you to drive in a manner that does not cause accidents. If a pedestrian is walking up the middle of the street, don't hit them, take a picture and call the police, have them picked up for jaywalking. If they're in the road, it's not a license to gun the accelerator. For a concrete example, California in general, you are required to stop for pedestrians only in crosswalks. If you hit a pedestrian in a crosswalk, even crossing against the light, you are at fault. But meanwhile, if you hit a pedestrian pretty much anywhere in the city limits of Santa Cruz, you're at fault. The rest of your comment seems spot-on.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    160. Re:But... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A nader-beeper for reverse gear would probably have avoided the accident.

      So would addressing the actual problem of people driving who would be screened out by mandatory re-testing, for all ages. DMV fees keep going up and we get nothing for it. Let's have some re-testing. (Also, let's have your mom watch where she walks. I look into cars to make sure someone isn't going to start it up and back over me.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    161. Re:But... by clem · · Score: 1

      Whoosh! Is that the sound it will make?

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
    162. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By then we will not download ringtones anymore, but cartones. Think of the possibilities! Make your Focus sound like a Ferrari, make it swing like Michael Jackson. Living next to the highway will be very entertaining.

      Perhaps something like this? http://blip.tv/file/1548179

    163. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Blind people shouldn't be crossing the road... They should be isolated and studied so it can be determined what nutrients they might possess which can be extracted for our personal use.

    164. Re:But... by flameproof · · Score: 1

      Look at it this way:

      If every car on the planet suddenly changed into a loaded .357 magnum with the hammer cocked it would be THE GUN OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITY to ensure you didn't inadvertently shoot somebody, wouldn't it?

      Pedestrians, and people in general, aught to have a reasonable expectation of safety in public and places where vehicles operate (use some common sense here - people don't weigh a 3/4 of a ton and and go 0-60 in 12 seconds). And no, one should never take this expectation for granted and all pedestrians should practice common sense safety, but motorists are expected via operator's license to take extra measures to protect those who are outside their vehicles. That's the way it is, that's the way it should be.

      Look at your state driver's training manual: I'm pretty sure it says something to the effect of "It is, in fact, your job to keep idiots (ie, people who are walking in public) safe".

      --
      ~Just as a thing fails if it lacks a kernel, so too it fails if it lacks a skin. ~ Rumi, Discourses
    165. Re:But... by LBt1st · · Score: 1

      "Nissan deems that at 12 mph the tires are loud enough to turn the sound off."

      If that's the case I'm all for it. Most traffic travels plenty faster then that so if the sound is only on when the car is going slow I think it's a win/win.

    166. Re:But... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      It varies widely. Tires designed for off-road use are loud even at fairly low speeds. Low-rolling-resistance tires used on econoboxes, especially hybrids, are designed to waste as little energy making noise as possible. Narrow, smooth tread, high pressure, firm sidewall. That's definitely hard to hear.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    167. Re:But... by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      http://mrmeval.is-a-geek.net/~mrmeval//mp3s/hum-sinister.mp3

      You can overlay them so that at rest you hear one sound but when moving the overlayed lower pitched sound is more evident. This can be done for several variations but I think you'd be limited to at most three overlapped sounds. I mixed the above with artsbuilder though you'll have to do the math on the frequency shift.

      For variations have a keypad marked with different variations and one marked "car skidding sideways at high speed mixed with shriek" which controls an arduino that controls an MP3 device. It can run lighting displays as well.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    168. Re:But... by sorak · · Score: 1

      So, as long as we have someone to blame, that's all that matters...

      Or should we have a backup, just in case it turns out that not all people on the road are good drivers?

    169. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. Turning off airbags would be easier, since cops can't tell your airbags are disabled as you drive by. Drive by a cop without being audible when electric vehicles are required to be audible, and you'll probably find yourself in trouble pretty quickly.

    170. Re:But... by Disfnord · · Score: 1

      So, let me get this straight, when a pedestrian is crossing the road when "the law" says it's appropriate, and you come barreling around the corner in your hummer without looking or slowing down, it's the pedestrian who's the asshole?

      And people wonder why so many pedestrians and bicyclists are anti-car...

    171. Re:But... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Tire roar isn't going away, and it's quite loud as-is on a road with a decent speed limit or the slightest bit of wear. If you can't hear that at all, you gotta be deaf.

    172. Re:But... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      In which case, all the blind people will be able to hear better because of less clutter. At that point, they'll be able to hear the whir of the electric motors rotating at 9000 rpms and there won't be a problem.

    173. Re:But... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      An astonishing fact about this: they're louder when people move faster. Combined with the wind rush, I'd bet you'd only hear cars that are much more likely to hit you than the average driver.

    174. Re:But... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I imagine that amount of failure is proportional to the stupidity of the majority of people in said area. It might be hard for the blind to cross the street normally, and making cars silent doesn't help that. But maybe in cities, if someone sees a blind person going to cross and a car speeding in their direction, that you should pull them back a bit and yell "Stop!" or "Car!"? That would eliminate at least 90% of the problem that might be created by silent cars.

    175. Re:But... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe people should be willing to help out said blind person? Like telling them its cool to cross, or pulling their shoulder and yelling "Car!" if someone's gonna run the light? Because that seems like the best approach. People learning how to help other people is better than mandating the way technology develops in order to help said people.

    176. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a switch to turn off airbags in most cars, usually accessible with the car's main key. In the UK at least, it's a legal requirement to turn off airbags in certain circumstances, such as if you have a rear-facing baby-seat leaning against where the airbag comes out.

      But yeah, you probably couldn't turn off that electric car sound thing as easily, seeing as there are no obvious reasons for needing to do so.

    177. Re:But... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Blind people are a big factor.

      They can't just walk out into the road and hope whenever they need to cross. With traditional cars you can hear a busy street a mile off, but a street full of stealth cars is a different matter.

    178. Re:But... by sjames · · Score: 1

      Make it sound like George Jetson's bubble car!

    179. Re:But... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      It's not my job as a driver to keep idiots safe.

      Ah! But tell that to the DA, your insurance company, and the pedestrian's lawyer during the civil trial.

      You do have a responsibility. Pedestrians include children, blind people, the elderly who can't cross the street fast enough for you, etc.

      Quit being a dick, and be careful with your 2,000 pound weapon. The life you save just might be your own.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    180. Re:But... by rantingkitten · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      So, let me get this straight, when a pedestrian is crossing the road when "the law" says it's appropriate, and you come barreling around the corner in your hummer without looking or slowing down, it's the pedestrian who's the asshole?

      He's an asshole for sauntering out into a street full of busy traffic, assuming and demanding that every car will come to a stop just for him... instead of waiting until the cars have passed.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    181. Re:But... by fireylord · · Score: 1

      and i'm assuming the driver of the vehicle got sued for causing injury due to not being in proper control of his/her vehicle. Here in the UK at least this falls under the criminal offense of driving without due care and attention.

    182. Re:But... by rantingkitten · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Even "legal" roadcrossings, ones that wouldn't be considered jaywalking, are problematic. In Atlanta, and many other cities to which I've been, there are two main types of crosswalks -- the ones at intersections with lights and all, which are generally fine, and the ones that aren't marked by anything more than a white stripe on the pavement.

      THOSE are the ones that suck so much, because people will just blindly wander into the street full of moving cars, but because they're in their precious painted part of the pavement, we're all supposed to immediately come to a dead halt.

      Why?

      Why isn't it 100% the fault of the dumb ped that walks into traffic? Let me repeat that -- regardless of the law, or paint on the pavement, or anything else, crossing the road when cars are coming is walking into traffic. There aren't many dumber things a human can do.

      That doesn't mean that drivers should be looking for people to run down, but I have seen way too many close-calls where soomeone almost gets hit. The pedestrian usually gets furious -- "I'm walkin' here! Right of way!" -- but has absolutely no right to be angry about almost being hit by a car when he chose to walk into a road full of moving cars.

      The proper course of action is to wait until the cars have passed and then go. If a driver hits you, it won't help you that he's liable under the law when you're a smear on the pavement. So take some responsibility, stop assuming the law is a magic shield against physics, and wait for the cars to clear.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    183. Re:But... by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      That's kind of my point. Yes, the DA, the insurance company, all of them would be pointing the finger at me if I hit a pedestrian, because the law says the pedestrian always has the right of way. And that's exactly the problem -- that law makes people think they're immune to basic physics and can just blindly wander out into traffic and nothing will happen to them.

      Can I repeat that? Pedestrians will wander into traffic and assume that absolutely nothing will happen to them, because some politician wrote something that says so, and those words will magically protect them from cars.

      If I hit a pedestrian at any significant speed, I'll go through some ungodly legal hassle and maybe even jail time, but the pedestrian will likely be crippled for life, or dead, and being able to legally blame me isn't going to fix that. So maybe the pedestrian, who bears a much greater risk of personal damage, should stop assuming laws will protect him, and instead choose not to walk out into traffic.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    184. Re:But... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Ah, Crazy Frog, back before he was violently gang raped by the mainstream media. He was never the same after that...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    185. Re:But... by westlake · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be easier for the blind or deaf to carry s little 360 degree Doppler radar which would squeal or vibrate when something is approaching faster then their gate?

      Not easier and certainly not cheaper.

      The sounder produced in the tens of millions of units will cost next to nothing. It can serve multiple purposes - auto horn, anti-theft, door ajar, back-up alarm and so on.

      Which suggests that the sounders are probably already in place and only need to be re-programmed.

      You are going to want that electric car to be audible to your kid when back out of your driveway. "Blind and deaf" is a fair description of a Buffalo, NY, pedestrian bundled up for the full force gale off Lake Erie.

      This is not a new problem.

      You see it wherever batteries, compressed air or bottled gas are used to power vehicles in industrial settings.

      The Doppler radar for the blind is durable medical hardware, available by prescription-only.

      It needs to be licensed and maintained. It needs the backing of your HMO and Medicaid/Medicare.

    186. Re:But... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Walking is a right, driving is a privilege.

      I've never fully understood that, nor why that gained acceptance as a concept. I suppose the term was first coined by someone who wanted control, and had an advertising budget.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    187. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hilarious. Calling pedestrains stupid and then suggesting funding radars to everyone!

    188. Re:But... by westlake · · Score: 1

      It's not my job as a driver to keep idiots safe.

      That is how a good driver is trained to respond.

      Because he needs to be prepared for the unexpected. The toddler on his low-rider trike. The unplowed sidewalk that forces pedestrians out onto the road.

      The bad-ass attitude is almost never a winner in court.

      The speed limit probably wasn't 40 mph and 40 might not have been safe under existing conditions.

      They jury will be looking at your lights, tires, windshield, and brakes.

      Your blood alcohol count.

      The jury will be asking if the pedestrian could have realistically judged the speed of your approach.

      There are, after all, pedestrian crossings which are never free of traffic during normal working hours.

    189. Re:But... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Only when it drives by me, apparently.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    190. Re:But... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Which is the point. Not crossing until you have made eye contact with the driver is a reasonably common method of reducing your chances of getting run over. Obviously one that isn't available to a blind person.

      That you can get run over anyway, doesn't mean that that technique doesn't reduce some of the ways that could happen.

    191. Re:But... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      And if there's a zebra crossing you can just cross blindly and never get hit! After all you have right of way.

    192. Re:But... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      No.

      But since some drivers are idiots, it's nice to have a fighting chance of looking out for yourself.

    193. Re:But... by shermo · · Score: 1

      As a cyclist, I have first hand experience of how much pedestrians rely on sound to detect cars. I wear a very bright yellow jacket. There's no way people could miss me if they looked in my direction before crossing the road, but they don't.

      I just expect everyone to walk out onto the road in front of me, and I'm hardly ever disappointed.

      It would be similar for electric cars except they travel faster and they aren't as effective at dodging pedestrians.

      It sounds like a reasonable suggestion to me.

      --
      Insanity: voting in the same two parties over and over again and expecting different results
    194. Re:But... by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      Around here (which is in the US), the law says that a pedestrian has the right of way "in a marked or unmarked crosswalk". Conveniently, the whole road is an unmarked crosswalk.

    195. Re:But... by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      Or you could look both ways before crossing the street instead of wandering out into traffic like a three year old, because some politician says you can. But this simple method apparently translates to "death trap" in your mind.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
    196. Re:But... by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

      Obligatory reference: The Office.

    197. Re:But... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Well, by that argumentation you cannot even use the pavement since some stupid fuck might drive on it.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    198. Re:But... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I thought a crosswalk (marked or unmarked) was only when crossing at intersections. There is no unmarked crosswalk assumed in the middle of blocks.

    199. Re:But... by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Yes. Tire roar isn't going away, and it's quite loud as-is on a road with a decent speed limit [...]
      So that covers highways, arterials and most collectors.

      Where I live, the speed limit for local roads is 50km/h normally, or 40 around schools. (That's 25 m/h for those who are still living in the 19th century.) Add some environmental noise, and all you can hear of a car at that speed is the engine.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    200. Re:But... by Dirtside · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean OMMMMMMMMINOUS HUMMMMMMMMMM?

      Slashdot says: "Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING." Thanks, Slashdot! I'll make sure I tell Sergeant Schlock that.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    201. Re:But... by mrmeval · · Score: 1
      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    202. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like drivers are any less impatient? Someone's always running reds, weaving lanes, ducking and dodging. And I say that as someone whose main mode of transportation is driving. It's not pedestrians that are the problem; it's the frenetic pace of time-oriented modern life.

    203. Re:But... by bronney · · Score: 1

      I can't speak, you insensitive clod!

    204. Re:But... by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, in the US drivers do not want to get into collisions with pedestrians because of legal repercussions. Pedestrians do not want to get into collisions with drivers because of physical repercussions. That's a bit of a simplification, but for the most part the system works.

    205. Re:But... by nacturation · · Score: 1

      And light pollution.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    206. Re:But... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      If there is a painted crosswalk you are expected to treat it like most people treat stopsigns... rolling stop. The law is that you have to be able to come to a safe stop. Now if you have eye contact with the pedestrian things might be a little different. If he is stopped waiting at the crosswalk that is different. But if someone is walking towards the walk and you dont slow down and he makes it to the cross a reasonable amount of time before you then it is your problem. You should be watching.
      Basically assume that pedestrians don't have brakes and have infinite right of way and you'll be ok. Pedestrians are at fault if they speed up to make it in front of you or stop and go. If they put a crosswalk in the middle of a busy street instead of a light or have one with no visibility it is the city sucking. In the case of a blind alley or some such you should really drive assuming someone will come out.

      Why is the law so biased against cars? Tons of reasons. Cars are privileges, they are the ones causing the danger, walking doesn't take a license, drunks and children are expected to walk. And in the case of a collision the pedestrians already have a huge ass fucking incentive to not get hit, cars don't.

      You use the words 'take some responsibility' ... they are.... they are responsible for their own lives. I assume you meant use caution. And that is perfectly valid. If some pedestrian was bitching that he keeps getting hit by cars while wearing headphones and skateboarding with his eyes closed i'd call him a fucking idiot.

    207. Re:But... by dintech · · Score: 1

      Japan? I always quite liked that sound.

    208. Re:But... by RichardJenkins · · Score: 1

      You should also stand directly behind the car; to simulate the effect of being a pedestrian listening out for electric cars.

    209. Re:But... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      No.

      It just means the that normal way to use a zebra crossing is to make sure the car is actually slowing down and has enough space to stop before you step in front of it. Eye contact is nice especially if they haven't completely stopped...

      Just like you don't go through the green light in your car when you see a truck that is going to run the red across you, even though you have right of way.

    210. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Darwin theory: if you are stupid enough to get run over by a car, you probably deserve it and society will be much better off.

    211. Re:But... by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      Oh dear, you fail to grasp the myriad ways we humans have grown accustomed to the sounds cars make. How often have you revved the engine as a way to signal impatience? The noise of an engine also indicates that the vehicle is moving under power and not rolling because some idiot forgot the handbrake.

      I see the proposed sound as a reassurance, not a warning. Considering the low speeds at which it is audible, it signals that the driver wants the car to move. A silent car that begins to roll triggers apprehension.

      Oh, and your second paragraph is unnecessarily aggressive. In most countries and in most states of the USA, a pedestrian who steps onto a motorway without looking is often at fault as well, but the legal argument isn't the point. It's that adding a sound reduces the risk of an accident, that the cost of the sound effect is lower than the sum costs of accidents were it not in place. Sure, the pedestrian may have been an idiot, but isn't it better to avoid the damage to your car and the lengthy distraction of an accident claim in the first place?

      And yes, the GP was a little too glib, but you don't have to fly off the handle (although this is par for Slashdot, I know). The truth is that operating a motor vehicle demands more responsibility, since it has more potential to harm others. All participants in traffic have to follow the rules, even pedestrians, but having a bigger car does not make you superior.

    212. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man. Doesn't it become so clearly obvious why we should *never* have flying cars when you see that clip? =)

    213. Re:But... by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      My guess is that experience with your Mazda played a role. My personal theory is that the noise is to reassure that the vehicle is being operated and not just rolling because the handbrake wasn't set. The whole "omigod it's an out of control car!" feeling.

    214. Re:But... by Danse · · Score: 1

      They should make it sound like the cars in The Jetsons. If we can't have flying cars, we can at least have cars that sound like flying cars :)

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
    215. Re:But... by james.m.henderson · · Score: 1

      In Canada I learned to think of right of way as being more like responsibility to yield. So in the crosswalk example, if cars see you at the crosswalk ready to cross, they should stop, however that doesn't mean you should just run into traffic if they aren't stopping. Same for stop signs and order of movement of cars. You may have the right of way, but if the other guy goes out of turn and you just drive into him, you are still going to be held liable, because _there was something you could have done to avoid the accident_.

    216. Re:But... by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      5) shorter than the person next to them... I've seen that scenario played out quite often. They're not paying attention, don't look around the taller obstacle, and when the taller person stops short, the shorter one keeps going only to be bounced off the train like a super-ball. Personally, I see it with kids several times a week (minus the train part) and have to throw my arm out and remind them to not rely on someone else's movement as indicative of relative safety.

    217. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds about like an electric city bus to me.

    218. Re:But... by MariusBoo · · Score: 1

      You are a surprising idiot. The way it works here (Europe) and the way the laws are probably on your side is this: when you come to a pedestrian crossing you slow down to a speed that allows you to stop the car should someone walk "into traffic". For all intents and purposes pedestrians have the right to cross first. If the visibility is so poor than you just stop the car and cross when you're confident. Otherwise if you kill/maim someone than you go to jail.

    219. Re:But... by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      This really is a solution to a problem which isn't there.

      - If all the cars all of a sudden would be quiet, everyone would just rely on their eyes for awareness, you know.. the in-built 360 degree, custom built for you, bio-degradable headgear (now with tilt and turn action!)

      Sound pollution is bad, and the fact cars won't have it anymore is a GOOD thing.

    220. Re:But... by iamhigh · · Score: 1
      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    221. Re:But... by vertinox · · Score: 1

      So take some responsibility, stop assuming the law is a magic shield against physics, and wait for the cars to clear.

      I think you have the wrong definition for "responsibility" but rather should be "caution".

      If the correct party was responsible and followed the law in the first place you wouldn't have to be paranoid every time you exercise your legal right to cross the street.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    222. Re:But... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Cars should make noise; not all intersections have streetlights.

      Cars do make noise. In my experience, the tires on the street make a lot more noise nowadays than the engines.

      Adding artificial noise is silly and stupid.

    223. Re:But... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      And in my country, blind people with a red/white cane always have right of way. Making cars extra noisy is stupid.

    224. Re:But... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Do this a block away from a busy street, for added realism. See how close he is.

      And how fast he's going. The faster a car is going, the more noise the tires make.

    225. Re:But... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I think I've got a solution to your problem: how about we require everybody to watch where they're going when in traffic?

    226. Re:But... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Cars do make noise. In my experience, the tires on the street make a lot more noise nowadays than the engines. Adding artificial noise is silly and stupid.

      When the wind is blowing the wrong way and the car is only going 35mph, it is easy to miss the tire noise. Adding artificial noise is serious life-saving intelligent action.

    227. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow dude, talk about missing a joke...

    228. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No thanks, I will not pay for your personal 360 Doppler Radar, which by the way you discribe will be constantly going off.

    229. Re:But... by Jawn98685 · · Score: 1

      "Such a device will work for cyclists as well as pedestrians...." Yeah, but why would I want that? A few more traffic-jamming, "I'm entitled to a whole lane even if I am moving at 20 mph under the speed limit", asshole cyclists getting punted into the ditch would be a good thing.

    230. Re:But... by tdp252 · · Score: 1

      What you don't understand is that in the sue-happy area of Atlanta peds are WANTING you to hit them so they experience the equivalent of wining the lotto!

    231. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not entirely true. In Portland OR for example, even if a pedestrian isn't in a crosswalk it is considered the driver's fault for hitting the pedestrian. Even if the moron didn't look both ways before running out in the street.

      It is one of the numerous reasons I hate driving in Portland.

    232. Re:But... by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine got a ticket for Jaywalking in Arizona. This appears to be fairly common in the Western US, or at least I have personally heard of a few different people that had this happen to them (Arizona and California). What was more unusual about my Arizona friend was that he didn't pay the jaywalking ticket, so they suspended his driver's license!

    233. Re:But... by holmstar · · Score: 1

      It isn't about the driver noticing the pedestrian, it is about the pedestrian noticing the car. If you are blind, at an uncontrolled intersection, and cars are silent, then you have no fricken clue when it is safe to cross. Any time you crossed the street there would be a significant likelihood that you would be killed. Basically, no sane blind person would be able to get around without a seeing-eye dog, or someone else to escort them.

    234. Re:But... by holmstar · · Score: 1

      No, it is a chance you are willing to take to have quiet cars. Adding a sound to an otherwise quiet car does not hold back technology.

    235. Re:But... by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      Stupid pedestrians? Stupid drivers? How about neither???

      *Ahem*: Parking lots. Some people step out of parking lots (if the lot is curved incorrectly, it's near impossible to see who's coming and going).

      Don't bother starting with that "go 5mph", because it would take you going about 2mph to even make a difference.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    236. Re:But... by AK+Dave · · Score: 1

      -Striking a pedestrian on a limited access highway where they are not allowed will usually result in both parties being held responsible.

      I don't think this is a solid rule across the country.

      I'm familiar with incidents in my locale where a pedestrian has attempted to cross a "limited access highway where they are not allowed", been struck and killed, and the driver not faulted (unless he/she fled the scene, which is a different crime entirely).

      I can think of one recent incident where a panhandler was struck in the middle of an intersection by a vehicle that had the right-of-way as the panhandler was walking back to the curb after collection a "donation" from a vehicle that had previously stopped. The panhandler walked across a turn lane, which was green, at night with dark clothing, and the only fault credited to the driver was that he/she fled the scene.

      I can think of another incident several months ago involving a divided highway, not pedestrian accessible, and construction on an overpass above it that made it temporarily inaccessible for pedestrian traffic, and a minor who defied all of the signage to attempt to cross the highway on foot. She was struck, killed, the driver stopped as required, and no fault was attributed to the driver.

      Seriousy, if someone pops out of the dark and winds up directly in the path of your 65mph car it cannot reasonably be the driver's fault. We don't blame trains for killing someone who hangs out on the tracks, against all warnings and common sense.

      As I'm fond of telling my own kids, there are laws of the land and laws of nature and laws of physics. The laws of physics trump them all. You can violate the laws of the land and do things that are crimes against nature without violating the laws of physics, or you can be perfectly legal and in harmony with nature but an F150 still trumps a bamboo bicycle every day of the week.

    237. Re:But... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      So would addressing the actual problem of people driving who would be screened out by mandatory re-testing, for all ages.

      Actually, doing that probably wouldn't have avoided the accident. Even people who are in their cognitive prime sometimes space out, or get distracted, or are careless. Nobody is perfect.

      (Also, let's have your mom watch where she walks. I look into cars to make sure someone isn't going to start it up and back over me.)

      Also a good idea, however not everybody is as conscientious or visually acute as you are. So it's all well and good to point fingers, but people are people and will make mistakes, and if there are ways to lessen the harm from those mistakes, they should be considered.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    238. Re:But... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Times the number of cars in this country = ~half a billion dollars.

      People could (and did) make very similar arguments about seat belts and air bags. In any case, the nader-beeper would only be necessary on very quiet cars (read: electrics), not for every existing car in the country.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    239. Re:But... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      When the wind is blowing the wrong way and the car is only going 35mph, it is easy to miss the tire noise.

      Which is why it's important to always pay attention and look out for other traffic.

    240. Re:But... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      When the wind is blowing the wrong way and the car is only going 35mph, it is easy to miss the tire noise.

      Which is why it's important to always pay attention and look out for other traffic.

      Is this an Abbot and Costello skit? We're talking about blind pedestrians...

    241. Re:But... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      We're talking about blind pedestrians...

      Do you really expect traffic to be safe enough so anyone can navigate it by hearing alone?

      Where I live, blind pedestrians usually either have a dog that watches traffic for them, or they have a red/white cane that gives them instant right of way when they cross the street.

      Even so, when weather circumstances are such that you can miss tire noise, you can also miss engine noise or artificially added noise. I paid extra attention to this yesterday, and noticed that with quite a lot of regular cars in my neighbourhood, the tires make as much noise than the engine. Not for buses, trucks and accellerating cars, obviously, but the engine of a normal car at a steady speed (40-50 kph, less than your 35 mph) really doesn't make all that much noise. And even less when decellerating.

    242. Re:But... by EnOne · · Score: 1

      Definitely a ominous hum.

      Li'l magic sleep gun
      you just don't have what I need
      that ominous hummmmmm

      --
      Calvin:Do you believe in the devil? Hobbes:I'm not sure man needs the help.
    243. Re:But... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You are assuming that only habitually stupid people do stupid things and that only blind people don't always look when crossing the road. In reality, most people who are normally quite sensible occasionally do something stupid like that. Maybe they are tired or stressed, or just simply not paying attention.

      You have to build a world that takes this in to account. You wouldn't want to be killed for making one mistake, one which most human beings do make at some point in their lives. It is the reason why when you try to delete a file the computer asks you "are you sure?" 99 times out of 100 you are, but that minor annoyance is worth putting up with to save your data that 1 other time.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    244. Re:But... by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

      You guys have obviously never lived next to a busy street. Quiet is GOOD! Noise is BAD! This sounds an awful lot like a "red flag law [see Wikipedia]."

      --
      Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
    245. Re:But... by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      I understand your concerns, but from the description the sound is supposed to be a hint to pedestrians that the vehicle is beginning to roll. Once the car reaches normal travel speeds, then the sound is turned off. The sound level on the street should still be lower than with current gasoline engines. Only when leaving a parking space and at traffic crossings would you hear the sound.

    246. Re:But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funnily enough, there is no such thing as jaywalking in the UK. Which means that pedestrians, because they can cross at pretty much any point, on the whole stop, look and listen for oncoming traffic before stepping out. Drivers also know to expect that people may cross the road and so take more care when there are lots of pedestrians about.

      I never understood the point of a law against crossing the road.

  2. Do electric sheep by rvw · · Score: 1

    Do electric sheep make noise as well in 2019?

    1. Re:Do electric sheep by Reeses · · Score: 1

      Only in your dreams.

      --
      Reeses
    2. Re:Do electric sheep by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only in your dreams.

      But are they really your dreams?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Do electric sheep by ciaohound · · Score: 4, Funny

      Get your ass to Mars.

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    4. Re:Do electric sheep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do electric sheep dream of androids?

    5. Re:Do electric sheep by selven · · Score: 1

      Of course, your dreams are the sanctuary of your mind, where no one can BUY NEW UNDERWEAR CHEAP

    6. Re:Do electric sheep by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      What exactly do you want with a donkey on Mars?

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    7. Re:Do electric sheep by Larryish · · Score: 1
  3. Siren Noise by Karganeth · · Score: 5, Funny

    They should make some kind of noise that sounds significantly different when its coming towards you compared with going away from you, just like how an ambulance or police siren is.

    1. Re:Siren Noise by bheekling · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Doppler Effect should take care of that for you. No matter what kind of sound is made, it's affected by the Doppler Effect.

      --
      "..."
    2. Re:Siren Noise by thewils · · Score: 2, Funny

      You cannot be serious about that remark!

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    3. Re:Siren Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      science fail!

    4. Re:Siren Noise by sebaseba · · Score: 1

      Sarcasm tags missing I hope.

    5. Re:Siren Noise by Ecuador · · Score: 2, Funny

      You are not replying to a youtube post, it was just a joke ;)

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    6. Re:Siren Noise by dotgain · · Score: 1

      You forgot to take his geek card. Kids know this stuff.

    7. Re:Siren Noise by mysidia · · Score: 1

      They should use directional speakers. When you are going forward it only gets played in the forward direction.

      When your vehicle is in reverse, it only gets played in the backward direction.

    8. Re:Siren Noise by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wheeeee-Oshhhhhhhhh!

      --
      "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
    9. Re:Siren Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Doppler Effect should take care of that for you. No matter what kind of sound is made, it's affected by the Doppler Effect.

      That's not enough. A constant tone is just pitch-shifted. Without any kind of reference it is very difficult to determine if the pitch is increasing, decreasing or staying the same. The "mom-ee" siren provides two alternating tones ABABABA so when it goes from A to B to A' it is easier for the human psychoacoustic system to tell if the pitch is going up or down and if the volume is going up or down.

    10. Re:Siren Noise by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 1

      ...unless the car is using a directed sonar to read the distance between itself and the person receiving the sound, and then modulating the sound it emits to a progressively lower frequency...

    11. Re:Siren Noise by FlyByPC · · Score: 1

      The Doppler Effect should take care of that for you. No matter what kind of sound is made, it's affected by the Doppler Effect.

      Not so much, at low speeds.

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    12. Re:Siren Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The doppler effect is inadequate at city speeds, whereas European sirens are distinctly different going towards and away.

      However my hope would be that mandatory electric car noise is audible only in front. There's no need to hear it after it has passed, and the world is noisy enough already .

    13. Re:Siren Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your suggestion fits perfectly with my plan to make my car sound like a TIE Fighter.

      "Hooouuuwwhhhrggrggrgrghhaaaaaaaahhhhhgh!"

    14. Re:Siren Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm glad someone came in to explain that joke. Christ.

    15. Re:Siren Noise by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like trucks!

      Actually I do not know if the trucks reversing are required to make "beep beep beep" in USA. Here in EU they make you wish you knew the guy who passed the law ... 15 years in prison would be about OK.

    16. Re:Siren Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe you just heard something with a doppler effect - it was the joke when it swooshed over your head.

    17. Re:Siren Noise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ladies and gentlemen: Karl Pilkington!

    18. Re:Siren Noise by smoker2 · · Score: 1
      There is a switch for that. It is not compulsory to use them, just be fitted with them. You use your head as to application. Sorry to disappoint the Libertarians.

      IMHO, the American electric cars should play "America, Fuck yeah". Seems fitting. Especially as the Libertarians will block any move to have *efficient* electric cars. That inefficiency creates jobs don'cha know ! Why save money later when you can save money now ! (then I can save *your* money later and now)

    19. Re:Siren Noise by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      I have personally seen truck drivers, park, get out of their vehicle, and verbally warn otherwise perfectly rational adults to move out of the way because they have gotten so acclimated to the reverse beep that they tune it out completely.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    20. Re:Siren Noise by david.given · · Score: 1

      One of the most absurd sounds I have ever experienced was driving at 60mph past someone playing the bagpipes in a roadside layby off Loch Linnhe in Scotland.

    21. Re:Siren Noise by Werkhaus · · Score: 1

      The doppler effect is inadequate at city speeds, whereas European sirens are distinctly different going towards and away.

      Demonstrated by the great Bill Bailey.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDnrUGsf0rY

    22. Re:Siren Noise by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I was thinking... an Anti-Doppler effect. That way no one knows you're coming but they can still hear you.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  4. Won't people just tune it out? by Jyms · · Score: 1

    I assume road noise is not enough. People are very good at tuning out noise. I hardly hear the truck reversing sound any more. Same with car alarms. Wonder how they will get around that.

    1. Re:Won't people just tune it out? by rvw · · Score: 1

      I assume road noise is not enough. People are very good at tuning out noise. I hardly hear the truck reversing sound any more. Same with car alarms. Wonder how they will get around that.

      Car alarms make me always wanna smash the windows. Then at least they have a reason to annoy me.

    2. Re:Won't people just tune it out? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      It's not really for people who can see and hear. It's more for blind people who are always going to be more aware of the sounds around them.

    3. Re:Won't people just tune it out? by The_Duck271 · · Score: 1

      Do you tune out the whir of a car coming towards you while you're crossing the street? That's what this is about.

    4. Re:Won't people just tune it out? by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      It's not really for people who can see and hear. It's more for blind people who are always going to be more aware of the sounds around them.

      Well, there's a point where adjusting everyone's technology for the sake of the handicapped crosses the line into impracticability, if not outright irrationality. I think this is one of those times.

      But hey, it makes the politicos who are promoting this nonsense look good in the polls.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:Won't people just tune it out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not entirely sure blind people will figure out that the sound that isn't a car is a car.

      I mean really. How many blind people will assume that the futuristic charge up sound or whatever is really a car instead of some kid playing a video game or something?

      I swear to god if someone uses the joke "The blind people who read slashdot" I will send my arm straight through the internet and steal your bag of cheetos.

    6. Re:Won't people just tune it out? by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      It's not really for people who can see and hear. It's more for blind people who are always going to be more aware of the sounds around them.

      Well, there's a point where adjusting everyone's technology for the sake of the handicapped crosses the line into impracticability, if not outright irrationality. I think this is one of those times.

      But hey, it makes the politicos who are promoting this nonsense look good in the polls.

      You don't know that the implementation of this is going to be impractical.

      And the only people who never acquire a disability are those who die young.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    7. Re:Won't people just tune it out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm blind and I read slashdot on a braille terminal you insensitive clod!

    8. Re:Won't people just tune it out? by Jyms · · Score: 1

      There is a huge difference between a sound that is generated by the interaction of complex machinery with the environment and a prerecorded sound played through a speaker. There are only a couple of reverse and car alarm sounds and therefore it is easy to tune them out.
      Having said that, we do tune out the sound of cars. I have lived near major roads and you tune out the sound very quickly. It is only when I visit my parents that live 95km from the nearest town that I realize how loud my environment is.
      If this is to warn blind people it makes some sense, but there must be a better solution than deliberate noise pollution.

    9. Re:Won't people just tune it out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows blind people love the Jetsons.

  5. Modified Quote by MLCT · · Score: 1

    It's too bad they won't live. But then again, what does.

  6. Put a card in the spokes by StormyWeather · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just put a card in the spokes. Yea, it's nerdy, but so is the car.

    http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/bto/20090918/NISSAN_EV6.jpg

    1. Re:Put a card in the spokes by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      What's nerdy about it? It looks like a ford focus hatchback.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Put a card in the spokes by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      And that exudes cool? I must be getting old! :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    3. Re:Put a card in the spokes by Grem135 · · Score: 0

      You forget, Kids these days dont put cards in spokes like we did......

    4. Re:Put a card in the spokes by JohnnyBGod · · Score: 1

      ...to someone who's blind.

  7. Ffffffsssss by thewils · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would want that sound that the USS Enterprise makes as it whizzes through space...

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    1. Re:Ffffffsssss by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would want that sound that the USS Enterprise makes as it whizzes through space. (emphasis mine)

      Technically... It already does and that appears to be the "problem". :-)

      This issue is ridiculous and assumes that the blind and inattentive notice any sound all the time. My Civic is super quite at slow speeds. Should it also be *required* to be louder?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    2. Re:Ffffffsssss by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 2, Funny

      Throw in the sound of the TARDIS from Doctor Who and I'll finally have a reason to get a driver's license.

    3. Re:Ffffffsssss by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I would want that sound that the USS Enterprise makes as it whizzes through space...

      Bongo's and choir? Uh, maybe not.
           

    4. Re:Ffffffsssss by 31415926535897 · · Score: 1

      I think I would like the sound of the monolith in 2001: A Space Odyssey.

    5. Re:Ffffffsssss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I would prefer a noise like a hundred thousand people saying "wop"

    6. Re:Ffffffsssss by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      When slowly passing through a crowded parking lot, I could warn pedestrians of my approach, with the sound the Martian spaceships made in the original 1953 version of War of The Worlds. The Martian spaceships made an eerie, but not too loud, sound as they slowly moved forward while flying low at about 20 MPH, while searching for targets. People on the ground could hear them slowly approach and see a beam of light coming from their external cobra like appendage, as the beam of light scanned side to side, while looking for targets.

      Whenever the Martian spaceship spotted humans, the sound changed ominously, for a couple of seconds, as they prepared to fire their disintegration ray.

      An electric car with the sound of a 1950s Martian spaceship slowly approaching, should be ample warning for pedestrians. The beam of light slowly scanning back and forth, would also warn them that something ominous and dangerous is approaching them from behind.

      If that does not get their attention, the changing pace of the scanning beam of light and the sound, would be warning that I have found a target and am preparing to honk my horn.

      When annoying pedestrians are no longer around, I would probably switch back to the softer and less ominous flying car sound and turn off the scanning/targeting beam of light. The Martian spaceship sound and scanning beam would mostly just be used in crowded parking lots or in school zones to warn pedestrians of my approach. Perhaps, I would not use the full pedestrian warning system that I described, very often.

      http://www.amazon.com/War-Worlds-Gene-Barry/dp/6305350221/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&s=dvd&qid=1253442887&sr=8-7

    7. Re:Ffffffsssss by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Your post is ridiculous and assumes that the seeing and inattentive notice any visual image all the time. Should it also be *required* to have lights on at night?

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    8. Re:Ffffffsssss by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
      My intention wasn't to be disrespectful to the blind or inattentive, but merely ask if even the slightest sound (like they intend) would be noticed all the time by the people for whom the idea is targeted to protect, which of course it wouldn't - hell, people routinely "don't here" even sirens - so it's a dumb idea. Furthermore, some current non-hybrid/electric cars are really quite and don't seem to cause a problem.

      Should it also be *required* to have lights on at night?

      Lights on at night are so the driver can see dumb-ass. :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    9. Re:Ffffffsssss by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Furthermore, some current non-hybrid/electric cars are really quite and don't seem to cause a problem.

      Except other posters mentioned that they do tend to sneak up on you because in your average city it's too noisy to hear the sound of their wheels at low speeds. I know that "data" is not the plural of "anecdote" but I don't see any scientific studies to show the opposite to that point.

      Lights on at night are so the driver can see dumb-ass. :-)

      Such as dumbasses who, without the light, would have no way of telling there's an ultra-silent car coming at them? Not every road is illuminated 24/7.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    10. Re:Ffffffsssss by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Not every road is illuminated 24/7.

      Since you had mentioned lights on and then asked if the cars then be required to be lit, I took it to mean you were referring to the cars not the roads. The lights on the *cars* are so the driver can see (and be seen). Lights on the road are helpful to both, but unnecessary.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    11. Re:Ffffffsssss by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I meant the lights on cars. The mention of illuminated roads was in case you have never been outside a city where most streets are illuminated at light.

      The point is that informing people about the car's presence is a good thing. Humans have two long-range senses and not everyone can use both, so it's a good idea to broadcast your presence on both "channels". Also, both car lights and sound help people infer the presence of a car without seeing it directly, which is useful when sight is obstructed (such as around some street corners or when a pedestrian wants to cross a street with many parking cars).

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  8. The Jetsons! by ZackSchil · · Score: 4, Funny

    I want my car to sound like the flying cars from The Jetsons. Then I can at least pretend that I got the future I was promised as a child.

    1. Re:The Jetsons! by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      Sure. Just stick it on an Aptera and you're half-way there. Just missing the flying bit.

    2. Re:The Jetsons! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want mine to sound like the Delorean from Back to the Future!

    3. Re:The Jetsons! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I want my car to sound like the flying cars from The Jetsons. Then I can at least pretend that I got the future I was promised as a child.

      "We were promised flying cars. I want my flying cars!"

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:The Jetsons! by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

      The greatest transportation we now have are crotch rocket motorcycles. Lightweight, powerful brakes, amazing horsepower to weight ratio, highly maneuverable. I've done commutes in a fraction of the time as all other available options, apart from aircraft, and have done them consistently for decades without accident.

      Regrettably, there are foes on the roadway, whose mission it is to steal from you the future you were promised as a child.

  9. Mazda announces their EV warning sound... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Funny

    In response, Mazda has announced that their cars will play an endless loop of a 6 year old saying "zoom-zoom!"

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  10. Car Ring Tones!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article ~ "Some reports suggest that in the future, car owners will download a sound for their car the way many consumers buy ring tones for their cellphones."

    Oh crap, now we have to listen to cars playing crappy tunes on bad speakers all the time. Can't their be a law against this proposed. I think a few dead pedestrians is worth the loss of the noise pollution.

    1. Re:Car Ring Tones!!! by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I think a few dead pedestrians is worth the loss of the noise pollution.

      Oh, I dunno ... there are some nice pedestrians, especially the ones with large breasts in fishnet outfits (yes, I saw one of those once ... damn near drove into the opposing lane.) Now, a few dead politicians would definitely be worth the price, in that it would reduce the level of noise pollution in Congress. Less hot air too, for that matter.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    2. Re:Car Ring Tones!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>I think a few dead pedestrians is worth the loss of the noise pollution.

      There are times when the death of a few is nothing compared to the death of millions. This is not one of those times.

    3. Re:Car Ring Tones!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In case it changes, I just want it to be known that "a few dead pedestrians is worth the loss of the noise pollution" was +4 insightful at the time I read it.

      I suggest that /. uses two CAPTCHAs: one to prove you're not a bot and one to prove you're not a DBA.

    4. Re:Car Ring Tones!!! by fyoder · · Score: 1

      Can't their be a law against this proposed. I think a few dead pedestrians is worth the loss of the noise pollution.

      It would improve the gene pool. Those smart enough to look before they cross would live to breed. It's a temporary problem, so it would be best if states weren't too quick to legislate.

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    5. Re:Car Ring Tones!!! by scottv67 · · Score: 1

      How about a loop of King Leonidas shouting "THIS..IS..SPARTA!!!"?

  11. For the more whimsical by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

    I suggest something more like the Jetsons' car.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  12. A new revenue opportunity. by jafo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yay! Pretty soon we'll be able to buy ringtones for our cars! Now kids won't have to go deaf turning their music up loud enough that everyone around can hear it. The Hip-hop ring tones will play on an outside speaker! Hooray.

    Sean

    1. Re:A new revenue opportunity. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I can't wait to get my own, so my car can emit the Brown Note

  13. ringtone by andyverbunt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great...
    What's next? A ringtone for your car?

    1. Re:ringtone by c-reus · · Score: 1

      RIAA gets the copyright for the regular car engine hum and will sue all car owners

  14. THE sound by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 1

    My roommate can reproduce the sound George Jetson's little car makes. But he hasn't put it on You Tube.

    Steve

    --
    Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
  15. Wow by MadUndergrad · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So they killed the electric car. Or rather, they will, if they're as dumb as they seem.

  16. Interesting job title by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

    Nissan sound engineers have announced

    What exactly would these people do on a daily basis?

    1. Re:Interesting job title by Zak3056 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What exactly would these people do on a daily basis?

      I would imagine they're normally responsible for minimizing road noise, engine noise heard inside the cabin, making the stereo sound good in the aurally hostile environment that is an automobile, etc.

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    2. Re:Interesting job title by SilverHatHacker · · Score: 1

      I'm no expert, but I would assume they would usually be the ones sound-proofing/improving the acoustics of the interior, dampening engine noises, etc. In this case, though, they want the car to make more noise, not less.

      --
      Funny may not give karma, but +5 Informative never made anyone snort coffee out their nose.
    3. Re:Interesting job title by The_Duck271 · · Score: 1

      Engineer sounds, duh.

    4. Re:Interesting job title by dotgain · · Score: 1

      You obviously don't drive a Nissan. Even when the airbags go off, it sounds like a beautiful fanfare.

    5. Re:Interesting job title by miggyb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now I want the Windows 95 TADA noise when my airbags are deployed. I love for my cars to have a sense of sarcasm.

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
    6. Re:Interesting job title by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      I guess I want "we require more vespene gas" when the tank runs low, and the Windows pinball start sound when I turn it on.

    7. Re:Interesting job title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you driven a 350z coupe or heard one drive by? A lot of work went into getting that sound just right.

    8. Re:Interesting job title by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Damping the engine noises. Dampening means they got it wet.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    9. Re:Interesting job title by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Presumably their normal work is making cars *quieter*, since that's what normal people want. (At least, making the interiors quieter.) I'm guessing none of them were hired with the job description: "make car noisier."

    10. Re:Interesting job title by noundi · · Score: 1

      My brother studied audio production, and in one of his classes, I think it was acoustics, he was taught this very interesting bit about sound engineers. I remember, incidently, he specifically told me that there are sound engineers whom make sure that the sound a closing car door makes is in a certain way. You might not have thought about it but when you close the door to an old car you can actually hear that it is old if you would close your eyes. But when you hear that, almost silent, click the door of a new car makes as it closes you get the feeling that it is a new car, and even a good car. I hadn't bothered to look it up but it seems that these engineers have a lot to do with how your car turned out in the end. Well paid proffession as well, I've been told. So it's not about only engines. It seems to stretch from your car door closing, to the windows going up and down, and now how your car "should" sound like as you're driving it.

      --
      I am the lawn!
    11. Re:Interesting job title by noundi · · Score: 1

      This tickled my interest so I consulted the google machine. http://soundinthemachine.org/2009/01/21/the-swaying-car-door.aspx

      --
      I am the lawn!
    12. Re:Interesting job title by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be a smart ass, you might want to check the dictionary first. In the acoustics industry, the terms are freely interchanged. In my area of expertise, damping is the quantitative measurement of the reduction and dampening is the act of applying the material or technique to effect a reduction.

      http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dampening
      1. To make damp.
      2. To deaden, restrain, or depress.
      3. To soundproof.

    13. Re:Interesting job title by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, that's crazy.

    14. Re:Interesting job title by noundi · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link, that's crazy.

      The fact that most of us consider a car with a door that closes with a silent click as a well crafted car, or the fact that people make a living off it? ;-)

      Remember -- the latter wouldn't exist without the former.

      --
      I am the lawn!
    15. Re:Interesting job title by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Much more than that. Since people buy cars on performance, these guys also engineer the exhaust noise to make the cars sound "sporty" or not as the case may be. These machines are the ultimate in consumer seduction. Why are people so hooked on making the few hours a day at most they spend in them, as close to the womb as possible ? Scared are we ?

    16. Re:Interesting job title by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      But making it sound like it was literally (liberally!) dampened, could be fun. "Gurgle, sploosh, bloop." I think I need this for my bicycle. It's very quite.

    17. Re:Interesting job title by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      But when you hear that, almost silent, click the door of a new car makes as it closes you get the feeling that it is a new car, and even a good car.
      I was told that people consider the almost silent click of a door to be the sound of a weak door, and so sound engineers worked on a way for even small light doors to heavy a good healthy "chunk" when you close them.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    18. Re:Interesting job title by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Man, now you've made up my mind what I want playing from my electric car. The Windows error "thunk" noise, with lots of bass. That should send 'em all running.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    19. Re:Interesting job title by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      Both work. My sister-in-law drove through some too-deep water and the inside of her engine got wet. It stopped making noise.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
    20. Re:Interesting job title by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more about how huge the "luxury" industry is. The $80k price tag isn't justified by its performance or its comfort or its features, but by a je ne sais quoi: the sound of a car door closing.

    21. Re:Interesting job title by Torodung · · Score: 1

      They play Rock Band Beatles, is my guess.

      --
      Toro

    22. Re:Interesting job title by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Well the obvious sound should be the sound of the EV's electro-mechanicals amplified through a speaker.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    23. Re:Interesting job title by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      I like to roll down the street blasting this.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    24. Re:Interesting job title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just better hope your car doesn't BSOD before they deploy.

    25. Re:Interesting job title by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      And how, even though it's allegedly only a $3 change, all the economy cars aren't doing it. Their doors still sound like crap, even though they don't have to.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  17. Woooooo WOOOOOOOO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the spinners go WOOOOOO WOOOOOOOO
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=YK18wQA-tHs

  18. Rewire it by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Tap into your stereo, problem of silly noises solved.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  19. Strange world by oldhack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Funny world we live in. Car noise became so ubiquitous, we "need" them.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    1. Re:Strange world by Jurily · · Score: 1

      Funny world we live in. Car noise became so ubiquitous, we "need" them.

      I don't like cars sneaking up on me when I'm on foot. Do you?

    2. Re:Strange world by Macrat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't like cars sneaking up on me when I'm on foot. Do you?

      Then stop walking in the middle of the road.

    3. Re:Strange world by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      Why do you think I'll be driving on the road ? I'm a car driver, I go where I fucking want !

    4. Re:Strange world by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Why do you think I'll be driving on the road ? I'm a car driver, I go where I fucking want !

      Why do you think I'll think before I post ? I'm a slashdot troll, I post where I fucking want !

    5. Re:Strange world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't like cars sneaking up on me when I'm on foot. Do you?

      If you had said "bike", you might(*) have had a case, but if you're on foot then you should have looked both ways.

      (*) The case would be that cars like to pass a bike from behind, but even that case is weak given that the sound is only needed below 12mph at which speed cars passing bikes isn't a problem (car/bike passes are only dangerous when there is a large speed delta and at 12mph the bike is more likely to pass the car).

    6. Re:Strange world by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      What about the side of the road when there is no footpath?

    7. Re:Strange world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did the Chicken cross the road?

      It didn't because no one needs to cross a road EVER.

    8. Re:Strange world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see you cross the street without doing that.

    9. Re:Strange world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about a parking lot near a school with children?

    10. Re:Strange world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just roads. The same thing might happen in a parking lot. They don't usually give you a clear path to and from your car.

  20. Example of the sound by sebaseba · · Score: 4, Informative

    An example of the sound is apparently this one. Not sure tho', found on an another site.

    1. Re:Example of the sound by ianezz · · Score: 1

      Not a spinner at all. Try this one at 00:51 and 01:00.

    2. Re:Example of the sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they should just let you download your own clip. maybe a really ugly family argument, a familiar tense voice berating you in a loving obsessive manner. think of the sense of identity and neighborhood personality. not only would the pedestrian hear you coming, they would know it is you.

    3. Re:Example of the sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Here is the spinner sound at 1m30.5s. Is using Youtube's search that freaking difficult!?

  21. As for me personally, by pokechop · · Score: 1

    ...I like the cars, the cars that go BOOM!!

    --
    xoviquom, ogdeuns
  22. Deaf people cope by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They actually bother to look, unlike many pedestrians who listen for traffic. Cyclists have to brake sharp or take evasive action to avoid these clowns.

    1. Re:Deaf people cope by Imrik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Blind people don't have the option of looking.

    2. Re:Deaf people cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're just not trying hard enough. (-1, Horrible)

    3. Re:Deaf people cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why don't they just walk at night?

    4. Re:Deaf people cope by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      Cyclists have to brake sharp or take evasive action to avoid these clowns.

      Do you mean cyclist clowns, or pedestrian clowns?

      One of my pet peeves is having to deal with cyclists blindly roll through intersections without a care in the world. Doesn't matter if I'm in a car or walking.

    5. Re:Deaf people cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a cyclist AND a pedestrian. The result is I hate both.

    6. Re:Deaf people cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but if blind people can't help a bicyclist complain (or sound superior) then they deserve whatever they get.

    7. Re:Deaf people cope by gmhowell · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And yet my ex-wife still can't do the world a favor by walking in front of a bus.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    8. Re:Deaf people cope by phonezilla · · Score: 1

      Its unfortunate , but the truth is that electric cars are actually causing a huge problem for the visually impaired community. Visually impaired people have used the sounds of traffic to know when it is safe to cross streets for years - contrary to public perception , guide dogs do not read traffic lights , the simply walk when their handler tells them its safe to go , based on what the handler hears around them yes I think that ringtones for cars is a nightmare , but silent cars a real danger to some folks

    9. Re:Deaf people cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hear guide dogs can see/hear pretty well.

    10. Re:Deaf people cope by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      I used to be annoyed at the cyclists who rode in the road and didn't stop at lights or stop signs. Then I discovered we don't have to according to Idaho State law. Of course you might want to anyway just because cars rarely notice you.

    11. Re:Deaf people cope by TheDugong · · Score: 1

      Try being a cyclist, a driver and a ped. I hate everyone. Luckily the human population of my mum's basement is on the low side.

    12. Re:Deaf people cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Oh boo-hoo! If they can't survive in the real world, then they shouldn't!
      Same as with everyone else.

      Little spoiled crybabies. That's what they are. And you support the genetic crapization of this planet. Thank you very much ugly mutant retard asshole!

    13. Re:Deaf people cope by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      If the lead gets suddenly yanked sideways, they know a car probably just went past. It's the same way they can tell when it;s time to pull the ripcord - just wait for the lead to go slack.

    14. Re:Deaf people cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then maybe blind people shouldn't be wandering in traffic in the first place?

      Plus there are absolutely no statistics saying that a quiet car is any more dangerous than a regular car. This smells of government pork. Just people trying for a money grab, both in the government and the people selling to the government.

    15. Re:Deaf people cope by PPH · · Score: 1

      Then I discovered we don't have to according to Idaho State law.

      And that's why us 4x4 drivers refer to those big bars on the front of our rigs as "Idaho Stop bars" now.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    16. Re:Deaf people cope by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      And are guide dogs easy to train, available, and suitable for all blind people?

    17. Re:Deaf people cope by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Plus there are absolutely no statistics saying that a quiet car is any more dangerous than a regular car.

      Really? You want them to do a study? And, when the results come out, you'll be like "Really? If you can't hear a car it's more dangerous? Why thank you Captain Obvious, I never would have guessed! Why do they waste money on this crap?"

      This smells of government pork. Just people trying for a money grab, both in the government and the people selling to the government.

      Government has nothing to do with this. This is all Nissan's idea.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    18. Re:Deaf people cope by coaxial · · Score: 1

      And that's why they cross at the corner.

    19. Re:Deaf people cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why being blind is considered a disability.

    20. Re:Deaf people cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come blind people are not mowed down by cyclists in droves? Cycles are pretty silent, cyclists usually reckless and the bike lane is usually pretty close to the sidewalk.

      We have plenty of blind people walking around here and many many times more cyclists of the ultimately reckless variant. I think, there are other reasons, not the sound alone.

    21. Re:Deaf people cope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you were blind, would you actually solely rely on your ears to tell you no cars are coming before you cross? That's insane. Maybe instead of regulating noise in a vehicle we should just make sure every blind person that can't get around on foot gets a seeing-eye dog.

      There are many ways to fix this "problem" if it even exists beyond just making silent vehicles noisy.

    22. Re:Deaf people cope by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Dogs cannot see that well and they are red-blind.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    23. Re:Deaf people cope by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if they can't do everything a healthy human can do they obviously can't possibly contribute to society and must be purged. Oh wait, they don't.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  23. they make that electric noise and if it's a sony r by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    they make that electric noise and if it's a sony run a way before the battery blows up.

  24. It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    We're Americans, dammit. Electric Cars, making no noise, are dainty and prissy. Carbonalicious Cars that go Vrooom-Vroooom, these are the cars that Real Men drive.

    I'm saying it in a snarky way (it's my curse), but you know that is what the auto-marketers are thinking. Safety? Oh, please...!

    1. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Funny

      I want mine to make the sound of a Bell HU-1 ...with optional Wagner overlay.

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      We're Americans, dammit. Electric Cars, making no noise, are dainty and prissy. Carbonalicious Cars that go Vrooom-Vroooom, these are the cars that Real Men drive.

      I'm saying it in a snarky way (it's my curse), but you know that is what the auto-marketers are thinking. Safety? Oh, please...!

      No, in all seriousness there have been complaints from pedestrians about how quiet cars like the Prius are. My friend owns a Prius, and if it's moving at a fairly low speed you won't hear it at all.

      I always assumed there'd be other sources of noise, e.g. the tires - but that thing can be eerily quiet.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by SBrach · · Score: 1

      Are the complaints from 4 year olds?? That is about the age most people are able to comprehend looking both ways before crossing street.

    4. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by i'm+lost · · Score: 1

      No, they're from 18 year olds that are too busy text messaging to look both ways when entering the street.

    5. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by srhill · · Score: 5, Funny

      My friend owns a Prius, and if it's moving at a fairly low speed you won't hear it at all.

      All you hear are the horrifying screams of the pedestrians being mowed down at 3 mph.

    6. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Thing+1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mine will chant "kill the wabbit, kill the wabbit"

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    7. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I second that. But the sound of a huge rolling tank... with a cannon shooting sound as the horn... that also has its appeal.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    8. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    9. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by ndavis · · Score: 1

      I want mine to be Ballmer yelling "Developers" That will be a warning to everyone

    10. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by nabsltd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I always assumed there'd be other sources of noise, e.g. the tires - but that thing can be eerily quiet.

      So can any modern, well-built small car from 100 feet away when travelling less than 12 mph.

      Really, the noise is basically useless if you are less than about 40 feet away, as you probably won't be able to avoid the car by noise alone with less than 2 seconds notice. And, from 100 feet away, unless you are gliding in neutral and revving the engine, a car moving 12mph is basically silent.

      Try it sometime...stand with your back to a car that starts 200 feet from you in a normally noisy parking lot, have it move towards you at 10-15mph, and then raise your hand when you identify the car by sound alone. I'll bet you identify a lot of other cars instead of the one heading towards you.

    11. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      All you hear are the horrifying screams of the pedestrians being mowed down at 3 mph.

      Dude, haven't you ever watched the movies? The Prius creeps up on them, whisper quiet, and then from about five to ten feet away (just far enough to give the pedestrians time to turn, raise their hands in a futile attempt to protect their eyes from the glare of its million-candlepower headlights, and then scream) it accelerates to about 60 mph before mowing them down.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    12. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by stockard · · Score: 1

      Well, I know I love the smell of ozone in the morning.

    13. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My friend owns a Prius, and if it's moving at a fairly low speed you won't hear it at all.

      All you hear are the horrifying screams of the pedestrians being mowed down at 3 mph.

      While the parent jests, it actually is not too pleasant to get hit at 5-15mph when riding a bicycle. A good deal of injury can be sustained just from falling over onto the ground, especially to the head. Getting hit at 10mph in an intersection could mean being pushed into traffic and killed.

    14. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Torodung · · Score: 1

      And now I'm picturing that scene in Austin Powers with the steamroller crushing the henchman.

      Stoooooooooooooooooooop! Stooooooooooooooooooop!

    15. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in space, nobody can hear you scream.

    16. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      That reminds of when, a few years ago, I was sitting around a campfire, with several friends, in a remote area in the mountains here in Arizona. Off in the distance, we could hear a track driven vehicle headed our way, driven by several drunken young guys, who were whooping and hollering wildly. In the darkness, we could tell by the sound, that the slow moving vehicle, was headed our way. The clickety-clacky noise, and the wild drunken whooping and hollering, just kept getting louder and louder and closer and sounded like it was headed directly towards our camp site.

      Finally, it passed by about 200 feet away, but due to the darkness and the trees and bushes blocking our view we did not get to see what kind of track-driven vehicle it was. The wild drunken guys just continued their whooping and hollering and shouting as they disappeared into the night and never came back.

      It did not sound quite like a large modern bulldozer, at least not one that had been manufactured in recent decades. I am guessing that it was something else, but I am not sure what. It probably was some very old piece of track-driven equipment that some rancher or miner has had on his property, for decades. It might conceivably even have been some kind of old WWII war surplus vehicle. It sounded rather large, but slightly lighter than most modern bulldozers.

      At least we did not have any bears visit our campsite, although we did see a sknunk along the creek nearby. An Apache indian and his dog, from the neighboring camp site, visited with us for a while around the camp fire, on the second night.

    17. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I love the smell of electrons in the morning!

    18. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know exactly how I want mine to sound: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yjy-fnsmWR4

      ps: Hey Slashdot, could you make the formatting help any harder to find?

    19. Re:It's Not About Safety, It's About Macho by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      Actually, I suspect the problem lies in how accustomed we've become to cars making a noise when being driven, and assume a silent car is driverless, as if some idiot forgot to set the hand brake. The noise is less "watch out!" and more "relax, I am in control".

  25. Ringtone cars by nnnneedles · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please not ringtone cars. Please please please. It's ten years into the future and I can't stand it already.

    --
    Will code a sig generator for food
    1. Re:Ringtone cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? It's the perfect court excuse: "I had to blow him up, your honor. His car was playing 'Rock Me Gently' 24 hours a day"

    2. Re:Ringtone cars by NoYob · · Score: 1
      Considering how narcissistic folks are with their cars, you know, the ones with the really loud stereos that you can hear from a mile away going *BOOM* BOOM* *BOOM*, I would think they'd like something that says in an infinite loop "Look at me! Look at me! Look at me!"

      I would also prefer that the folks who like the loud pipes on their Harley's - you know the ones that make your ears ring when they drive by.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    3. Re: ringtone cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget the safety aspect. Nissan probably did a study and found that people believe the car is faster and has more pick up if there is a noise associated with it. Just like noisy vacuum cleaners are perceived as cleaning better...

    4. Re:Ringtone cars by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      You need The Citizens Infringement Officer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ebj85Q4vS7Y

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    5. Re:Ringtone cars by dreamer.redeemer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not so much. I have a really loud stereo because *I* like it, not because I want attention; quite the opposite actually, I get really uncomfortable and stressed out when people focus on me (obviously, given that i'm posting here). A slashdot user with a loud stereo shouldn't be surprising... I like music, math, physics and electronics, and a serious car stereo is an obvious intersection of these sets. As a geek it's pretty exciting to blow a 65 amp fuse, to play with bridged amps, a big capacitor and 1-gauge wire.

      --
      the most powerful intellect is that unbounded by indubitable preconception
    6. Re:Ringtone cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a friend who gets on my nerves because he is such a damn freeloader. When I hear his cellphone not only does the ringtone make me angry, it makes me think how damnably stupid he is. and how I am sick of him and want to rid myself of his freeloading ways. and not hear that fargin ringtone ever again. what really got me was that both him and his brother pissed in a parking lot of a nice area after we got some dinner. in broad daylight. with kids around.

      This is why I do not have a cell phone.

    7. Re:Ringtone cars by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Please not ringtone cars. Please please please

      Why not, it will go well with a karaoke microphone in the steering wheel.
      Get close to the speakers at rock concerts while there's still time!

  26. Just what we need - more noise. by Jonathan+A · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But one of the nice things about electric cars is that they're so quiet. Can you turn the sound off?

    If it can't be turned off, then I, for one, won't be buying one. Modern life is noisy enough as it is.

    1. Re:Just what we need - more noise. by FlyByPC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But one of the nice things about electric cars is that they're so quiet. Can you turn the sound off?

      If it can't be turned off, then I, for one, won't be buying one. Modern life is noisy enough as it is.

      Of *course* it can be turned off. Find the speakers, grab some diagonal cutters...

      --
      Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    2. Re:Just what we need - more noise. by iris-n · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Probably it'll be illegal to turn it off. The same way it's illegal to drive at night with the lights out.

      --
      entropy happens
  27. Do Leafs sound like dreams of Electric Sheep? by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
  28. The answer is obvious by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    Just make massive subwoofers and reggaeton mandatory, problem solved.

    --
    No sig today...
  29. They don't need a noise ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    they need a smell, to reflect their new potential. The smell should be 'silent but deadly'

  30. Why bother? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we didn't expect cars to make noise in the first place then this wouldn't be necessary. Besides, all the electric vehicles I've ever seen make noise anyway - sometimes enough to be annoying.

  31. Potential confusion by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    That's almost indistinguishable from the sound that the doors make when they open.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    1. Re:Potential confusion by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Sirius Cybernetics Corporation?

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  32. You mean like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    'ringtones' for cars ? Oh, the horror...

    1. Re:You mean like... by onemorechip · · Score: 1

      Here you go.

      --
      But, I wanted socialized health insurance!
  33. Haven't we been through this? by mi · · Score: 1

    When the cars, or, rather, horseless carriages were first introduced, didn't some locales require them to be preceded by a person carrying a bell — to warn the public of the monstrosity's approach?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Haven't we been through this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When the cars, or, rather, horseless carriages were first introduced, didn't some locales require them to be preceded by a person carrying a bell -- to warn the public of the monstrosity's approach?

      Sorry, no mod points left for the parent, but... bells to warn the public of the *monstrosity's* approach certainly sounds like a good idea to me.

  34. Re:You're slipping, Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have expected a veritable legion of Anonymous Cowards suggesting wave files of fart noises, looped at ultra high volume, by this point.

    It would be drowned out by the hip hop, or whatever is playing on those absurdly large subwoofers.

  35. Loud Pipes Save Lives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't the pedestrians just carry boom boxes?

  36. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does it mean I'll get more Arabic music for free under my window in Frankfurt?

    1. Re:Oh no! by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Probably no since there is no BMW 3 series hybrid.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  37. Booming car noice market? by miffo.swe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will this result in a new market where you can D/L different sounds for your car? Gives rice car a new meaning. Drive downtown late friday night with a honda that sounds like a Murcielago 660 and see people look for the Ghost Car.

    I think i like this idea. I think the most popular sound will be "fart".

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Booming car noice market? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Will this result in a new market where you can D/L different sounds for your car?

      Quite plausibly. And probably with DRM too, to make it impossible for you to upload your own sounds, and to stop you from starting your car if the license fee hasn't been paid this week. "Ha ha, but serious."

      Gives rice car a new meaning.

      Life is to short to waste time finding out what "rice car" means already ; I take it that it's not a car composed entirely of small oval carbohydrate grains.

      Drive downtown late friday night with a honda that sounds like a Murcielago 660 and see people look for the Ghost Car.

      Two more bits of somewhere's culture that have completely passed me by. Oh dear, what a pity, never mind.

      I think i like this idea. I think the most popular sound will be "fart".

      The idea does have a certain appeal to it.
      I think that "orgasm" (m, f, both, together or separately) will rapidly displace that from the charts. Most people who are old enough to drive are old enough to have somewhat outgrown adolescent toilet humour. But that makes me realise ... there will be an awful lot of parents ferrying their little bundle of joy around to the sound of a "Postman Pat"-mobile, or a Thomas-the-Tank-Engine chuffing.
      Pass the vomit bucket.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  38. We're more sophisticated now... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...why a fart noise when you could play the Brown Noise?

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  39. Re:You're slipping, Slashdot by Donkey_Hotey · · Score: 1

    I would have expected a veritable legion of Anonymous Cowards suggesting wave files of fart noises, looped at ultra high volume, by this point.

    It would be drowned out by the hip hop, or whatever is playing on those absurdly large subwoofers.

    You make it sound as if there was a difference...

    --
    (There is supposed to be a Sarcmark® here, but my $1.99 check hasn't cleared, yet...)
  40. go drive through a walmart parking lot by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At least 75% of the pedestrians don't look *either* way.

    The mouth breathers are of the belief that 8 oz of striping paint will stop 3 tons of Detroit steel.

    1. Re:go drive through a walmart parking lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could believe it. Have you seen how reliable detroit cars are?!

    2. Re:go drive through a walmart parking lot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't read Darwin's Evolution of Species; PARTICIPATE go to Walmart in a Prius!

    3. Re:go drive through a walmart parking lot by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      I like to think of that as modern day natural selection.

    4. Re:go drive through a walmart parking lot by jellybear · · Score: 1

      Exactly: "I don't care 'about right of way'! My CAR could KILL you!!!!!"

      Nice.

  41. a new meme? by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

    Get off my road, you crazy vegans!

  42. Chitty Chitty Bang Bang, anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I love this. Sure, it's gonna be annoying, but as long as folks that buy Harley's can replace the proper muffler with something chrome and flatulent, I don't see why the rest of us can't have the sounds we want.

    How about a Ferrari sound for yer hybrid?

    This is gonna get totally out of hand. I can't wait for the mayhem!

  43. cartoon noises by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I want it to make the barney rubble "Flintstones" bongo running noise and vary with ground speed.
    random cartoon noises other selectable ones could be fun like the fake orgasm from that meg Ryan restaurant
      scene wear Rob Rayner's mom says I'll have what shes having. i just remember the scene not the movie.

  44. I'm not sold... by mick88 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TFA links to the National Federation for the Blind's article about this topic. Here's the most relevant snippet: >> While there are no national data on pedestrian injuries or deaths related to low-noise cars... Ok - guys: get some data! This is just plain ridiculous to pass a law based on a mere assumption that quiet cars might cause a problem. If someone can prove that this is a plague upon the nation - great; pass the law. But otherwise this is a fake problem. I've owned a civic hybrid and a prius. Neither were really noticeably quieter (even when the prius was operating electric only) than your typical accord / camry. Does anyone have any data at all anywhere showing the increased incident rate for quiet cars? I'd love to see it, but I'm pretty sure it's not there.

    --
    I created this account just so I could comment on this story
    1. Re:I'm not sold... by Loomismeister · · Score: 1

      A hybrid electric car will make pretty much ZERO noise, and if you've actually driven one you would know that. When driving through parking lots you can sneak up on any pedestrians very easily.

    2. Re:I'm not sold... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok - guys: get some data!

      Do you realise what your actually saying here?

    3. Re:I'm not sold... by mick88 · · Score: 1

      As I mentioned, the civic and prius I drive / have driven are not noiseless. The tire noise & the motor noise are plenty to alert pedestrians. Not to mention the engine noise - you really only are on electric only for very short periods, usually less than a minute & at extremely low speeds. I've had one hybrid or another for 6 years and never once - ever - have I had anyone not pick up on my presence due to low noise. I know it seems like it would happen, but I'm telling you from experience it doesn't. Until someone shows me some data, it is a completely manufactured problem.

      --
      I created this account just so I could comment on this story
    4. Re:I'm not sold... by Loomismeister · · Score: 1

      By extremely low speeds you mean -20 at least. The issue here is in parking lots when your not using anything BUT the electric engine and there isn't tire noise to speak of. There doesn't need to be laws regardless in order to protect people though. Lets say injuries occur more frequently, so who cares? You get hit at 10mph and you maybe have a bruise.

  45. Given the way things are going... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. the RIAA will copyright every conceivable sound and demand that you not drive your vehicle or you will be found in violation of their copyright. No one will be able to drive anywhere under threat of lawsuit (at least in the US).

    The economy will collapse totally, and we'll all be riding horseback.

    I'm investing in saddles. Who's with me?

  46. Missing Option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Am I the only person who would, without hesitation, load up a TIE Fighter sample?

    1. Re:Missing Option by hack++slash · · Score: 1

      I would want to add an 8-segment sequence flashing red light to the front of my e-car and play the sound of KITT.

      And I would want my e-car in the shape of a black Pontiac Firebird Trans Am :D (not the re-incarnation of the recent tv remake, just doesn't look right at all)

      --
      To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
  47. You know they won't, but... by istartedi · · Score: 1

    ...wouldn't it be awesome if we had an "open car platform" that would let you put whatever the heck you wanted in there? I understand that opening the whole platform might have safety and/or legal issues; but I can dream.

    Besides, people already put illegal chips in their cars to override the emissions and get more HP.

    Arguing that the whole car system should be closed only hurts law abiding people who'd like to put their own noise in there, or change the fonts on their computerized dash display.

    That, and once you've opened the door to letting people direct tons of metal at high velocity, any other mod they make is relatively unimportant as far as safety is concerned. Of course, that kind of logic never works when it comes to legal stuff so... sigh... we're pretty much left with the stock noise and/or voiding our warranties, risking hefty fines, or a trip to Gitmo because we violated the Digitial Millenium Car Act.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  48. Best sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The Crazy Frog ringtone.
    That will sure scare the pedestrians away!

    1. Re:Best sound by arb+phd+slp · · Score: 1

      Scare away? I'd chase that car down the road throwing rocks at it.

      --
      There's a perfect xkcd for my sig but I'm too lazy to look it up. sudo someone go find it.
  49. My cartone by Sbetsho · · Score: 1

    This would be my cartone: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CIpof-p7h8Q

    1. Re:My cartone by speedtux · · Score: 1

      That song has been so overused in dystopic SF movies that it has taken on a rather menacing meaning.

  50. @#%&!* Teasers! by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    They smell like flying cars, they sound like flying cars, they look like flying cars, they probably even taste like flying cars, but they CANNOT give us a . . .damned . . . FLYING . . . CAR !?

    1. Re:@#%&!* Teasers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're example for "look like flying cars" would have been better had it been a car and not a shopping cart.

    2. Re:@#%&!* Teasers! by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      Thank god. Have you watched your local morning traffic report? People have yet to figure out how to drive land-based vehicles without crashing into each other. I don't think we need cars falling from the sky because some guy was too busy shaving and hit some chick putting on her make-up at 100 feet.

      Now if they invented vehicles that just hovered 2-3 feet off the ground, I be all over that. No need for paved roads, bridges, salt/sand on roads in winter. Just make it better looking and hold more people than this one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landspeeder

  51. Dibs on the "Jaws" theme. by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

    Or maybe "Dueling Banjos". So many ways to make people really want to get out of your way...

  52. You must be the onliest one.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...every civic I see around here has an aftermarket fartcan installed, along with some graphic of an anime ninja guy with a katana, and a set of ailerons off of an old MIG.

  53. I don't recall... by Schnoogs · · Score: 0

    ...a nanny government in the movie Blade Runner.

  54. I have the perfect sound! by stimpleton · · Score: 1

    What is better than those ice cream trucks!
    Everyone loves them, and when you hear them you become alert and look around.

    Pedestrian crossing accidents will plummet!

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    1. Re:I have the perfect sound! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, agent-related fatalities might rise...

  55. A more efficient solution by horza · · Score: 0

    Now I haven't patented this idea, but I'm giving it free to the world as prior art. Rather than making a constant noise, causing noise pollution and irritating residents, my invention enables the person driving to cause the vehicle to emit a noise when there is a road user or pedestrian that is in potential danger. Taking my inspiration from boats, that use a 'horn' to warn oncoming traffic, we could use a miniature horn that makes a loud sound as a warning. It would be placed somewhere easily accessible to the driver, for example on or near the steering wheel. What do you think?

    Phillip.

  56. Blade Runner by Darylium · · Score: 1

    Yeah, so we've finally managed to make cars sound like Blade Runner... Good job! So I guess the hard work is done... all there's left is to make them fly.

  57. but by furbearntrout · · Score: 1

    I want a real flying car
    Just because it sounds the same doesn't make it the same

    I want one.

    --
    Crap. What did the new CSS do with the "Post anonymously" option??
  58. Apocalypse Now by theeddie55 · · Score: 1

    I'd have to rig it to play Ride of the Valkyries, that'd make people get out of the way.

  59. Alternatively by Vahokif · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why not make cars transmit a signal that can be picked up by nearby personal receivers for blind people? It'd eliminate noise pollution and everyone else could just look.

  60. Yes, but is it themable? by tzot · · Score: 1

    That's the key to success. Pay $350 and make it sound like a Light Cycle.

    --
    I speak England very best
    1. Re:Yes, but is it themable? by VanessaE · · Score: 1

      If I were going to pull sounds from Tron, I'd have chosen the "whoom whoom..." engine effect from a fast-moving Recognizer, or the "simulation" (the stolen one that resembles a solar sail), or perhaps the sound of Sark's airship. Seems like those sorts of sounds would fit the "futuristic-sounding" category while still fitting in reasonably well with normal traffic noise.

  61. Ring tones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh gawd, I can just hear the 16yr olds with their "Crazy Frog" sounding cars now.....arggh

    1. Re:Ring tones? by PPH · · Score: 1

      I want the "clip-clop" horseshoe sound of an Amish wagon.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  62. Or... by blue+l0g1c · · Score: 0

    Pedestrians could just cross the street at crosswalks when it's indicated that it's safe. You know, utilize the safety precautions we already have in place instead of mandating that cars make noise.
    My car already has a device installed to warn pedestrians when it is unsafe to cross. It goes beep beep when I push on the middle of my steering wheel (actually mine shorts out my electrical system, but you know what I'm getting at).

  63. Bar alarm by AlpineR · · Score: 1

    This isn't delegating responsibility, this is alerting a pedestrian when the idiot drunk driver is coming towards you at excessive speed. Have you seriously never encountered an irresponsible driver?

    The audio effect only kicks in below 12 MPH, when the motor and tire noise is too quiet to be heard otherwise. Or were you proposing a siren connected to a breathalyzer?

  64. Mod kits. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want my car to sound like the Jetson's vehicles. I'll be one of the first to buy the mod kit.

  65. Great Sounds by wcb4 · · Score: 1

    I want my car to sound like K.I.T.T. or better yet, a cylon.

    --
    I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
  66. Why on earth would we want to ADD more noise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They already make noise ... its called the HORN!

    Why on earth would we want to add noise? We don't add noise to bicycles to protect the cars from them. I get really miffed when the bicyclists decide its okay to blow through red lights and stop signs because they think they are exempt. Do what your parents told you long ago. Stop ... look both ways... and THEN cross the street. Stop and the stop signs and don't go through the red lights.

  67. this sucks by tomohawk · · Score: 1

    Why does everything have to be noisy?

  68. ding ding goes the light rail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    When the light rail was first installed in san jose, they had the same problem - too quiet. So they installed a recording of a bell -ding ding ding ding that rang as long as the trian was going slow enough.

  69. Scary... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Nissan has thought this conning plan all the way through....?

    It's a bit like making a device to attach smells to email: I'm sure the designers would be thinking of people sending rose-scented love letters on Valentine's day and wonderful new recipes with apple and cinnamon ... but out in the real world people would mostly use it to send their first fart of the morning with the 'contrast' setting cranked up to 11.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Scary... by dougmc · · Score: 1

      The article didn't say the end user could customize the sound.

      Sure, I imagine that many people will want to customize it, and a few will actually do so, but most are likely to leave it at the default because they can't figure out how to change it. (And I imagine Nissan won't make it easy -- like you'd have to rewrite the internal computer's ROM, or disconnect the speaker it uses and connect it to your own sound generator circuitry, etc.)

    2. Re:Scary... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      If the device fits typical automotive design strategies, it will be a fairly simple replaceable module, and replacement units which support user-customizable audio will be a simple plug-in swap. It makes most sense to make a totally separate module for this purpose because the only thing in the car currently designed to make noise is the navigation system. (Stereos are purchased as units by OEMs and every time someone puts a 'special' one into a car, like the oval units in a Ford, people who work on cars buy another gun and polish it in the evenings.)

      Given the module's purpose, it doesn't really even need any digital circuitry... but they'll probably do it digitally anyway, just so there's less chance of degradation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  70. ASCAP by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'll just have it emit whatever's playing on my stereo.

    ASCAP or another major performance rights organization would bust a CAP in your AS for that. The music on your stereo probably isn't licensed for an intentional public performance.

    1. Re:ASCAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they can just go fist themselves then.

  71. Oh, the possibilities by WoRLoKKeD · · Score: 1

    We could have electric hearses playing Always Look On The Bright Side Of Life. Please. Make it so!

    --
    Immolation is the sincerest form of flattery.
  72. Sell it to ricers by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    They may not be able to figure out how to put a fartcan muffler on it, but they'll darn sure figure out how to put a 2000 watt stereo in it. No problem hearing that coming down the road. Another benefit, is that with the neon and the stereo and the DVD and all the other crap in there, the batteries won't last long enough for it to run into you.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  73. No Sound is a BLESSING by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years back I was in bar in Amsterdam and the topic of soundlessness in electric cars came up. I, for one, was happy about it having lived in cities with the sound of street noise my whole life and not liking it much. Then I quickly realized that it only would be a matter of time before people came up with the idea to create custom sounds for their cars. My happiness soon faded. Hopefully the legal system in this instance will act to stop this kind of pollution.

    Except in the case of the blind a soundless car shouldn't be an issue; one of the first things I remember being taught as a child was to look both ways before crossing the street...

  74. scifi by dominious · · Score: 1

    wow, watching scifi movies i always wondered why would future cars make such noises...now it makes sense!

  75. You mean nobody... by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    ...thought of the startup sound for the Ghostbuster's Proton Pack?

    --
    [End Of Line]
  76. Oh yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We can do this now. Just reverse all your car speakers so they play outwords, and beat the trend. It would be cool to buy high quality tube driven synths and beatboxes for your car so your friends could actually produce the music while you drove. By all the wooshing and humming lameness.

  77. People don't realise how much they rely on sound. by quenda · · Score: 1

    I would have thought I always look before stepping on the road, but the truth is that on a quiet road people often look over their shoulder _after_ stepping on the road.
        I notice this when cycling. Especially of the footpath is narrow or crowded, and traffic is thin and slow. You learn not to ride too close to the kerb, and use your bell because people frequently step onto the road before looking properly.
        Sure they look before crossing the middle, but there seems to be an unconscious assumption that if they hear nothing, then nothing is close.

    And if you have ever been to a city where heavy electric scooters are common (Asia), you'll know what a menace they can be on the footpaths!
    I don't think any of this applies at highway speed though. Nobody steps onto a 60m/100kph road without a damned good look.

  78. Re:But... KEEP THE SOUND ON! by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    Bicyclists depend on audible cues from traffic. Please keep the sound on. Sometimes you can hear a stupid driver and take defensive action immediately.
    Silent death is a bad thing.

  79. And then the Highway sounded like a Casino by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    So you're sitting in traffic... and all you can hear is a thousand cars making a thousand "personalized" sounds (only $29.99 each, available on iTunes!) all around you.

    Fantastic.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
  80. Downloadable by PPH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like ringtones.

    I mean, if Nissan dosn't catch a clue about this, it'll be hacked anyway.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Downloadable by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1

      You know if you can download your own, like a ringtone, I'll just download the "silent" one.

  81. Better be blaster fire... by Antarctic+Pirates · · Score: 2, Funny

    If the car itself makes an annoying noise, can anyone image how awful the car alarm is gonna be?

    1. Re:Better be blaster fire... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      At last - a use for "achy breaky heart".

  82. Make mine sound like ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... one of those "Idaho Stop" bicycles being dragged under the frame of an SUV.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  83. WRONG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That depends where you live. In Egypt, we drive at night with the lights out.

    1. Re:WRONG. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's very sensible. At least the Egyptians are conserving energy.

  84. boots're made for by Triv · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your eyes aren't everything - I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm much faster to react to something I hear over something I see.

    I live in a fairly large city in the northeast US. I walk a lot, but not like true urban walking - it's a mile and a half to the train station, and I walk it twice a day outside of light groceries and the like. I grew up walking in NYC and its suburbs, and I've been lucky enough to never actually need a driver's license. My feet do me just fine for most things.

    So believe me when I say that the idea of a truly silent car terrifies me. I look both ways when I cross the street, I don't habitually jaywalk, I follow street signs and stay on the curb until the light changes, but if all that fails or if a driver isn't paying the same kind of attention I am to the road (he has a steel cage around him; I don't) I rely on my ears. I've had my ass saved on more than one occasion by hearing a car swinging around a corner towards me that I couldn't see yet.

    There are a lot of stupid drivers on the road. There are also a lot of careless or over-confident pedestrians. But I can't see this as a bad thing - my eyes might keep me from walking out into the middle of traffic, but my ears are what get me to step back quickly onto the curb because somebody in a car isn't being careful.

    1. Re:boots're made for by pevgeniy · · Score: 1

      I think these silent cars to appear only years through 10. For now especially at us in Russia it is difficult not to notice coming nearer truck

      --
      My Blog http://www.freedomplanet.ru
    2. Re:boots're made for by rpillala · · Score: 1

      I agree, this is no different from the beeping added to large trucks when they are in reverse. An earlier poster quoted from the article that the sound will shut off after a certain speed since the car will then be making enough sound on its own.

      --
      When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
    3. Re:boots're made for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your eyes aren't everything - I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm much faster to react to something I hear over something I see.

      How true this is. I live in Australia where the pedestrian crossings have an associated sound to let you know when its safe to walk. My wife and I recently visited New York and for the first day we often missed the pedestrian crossing lights as we were not watching the lights but instead waiting for the sound.

      I never realised how much I rely on the sound rather than just the changing of the lights.

  85. Why not a playing card in the spokes or a bell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Its amazing people wait till a corporation patents something that is obvious to make oneself and say this is the best thing since sliced bread.

    As a citizen of Boulder, CO USA which has a high number of bicycles and silent hybrids including electrics - given the larger demographic area we have enough problems with bicycle/pedestrian accidents to spawn a cottage industry for lawyers.

    Its a sign of autumn to see the leaves turn and have the newbie students move in. Its a time to remember to slam the breaks on bicyclists who whiz by "silently" on the left/right/behind/infront often at dusk without reflectors, wearing dark clothing and without reflectors.

    My point is If we can't get noise makers on bicycles I don't see it to happen on electric vehicles. Basic safety systems are needed on Bicycles but are missing despite their higher rate of probability have a serious accident with pedestrians. Ever seen someone whose cheek got "hooked" on a handbrake when they were runover? It was like the seen in the Dark Night - Why so Serious Son?

    Why not a $4 squirrel cage fan thats LOUD and is attached to main or the aux systems?
    Why not a playing card in the spokes or a bell?
    Why the needless reinvention?

    LOL

  86. Re:But...What about Hit, Backups, and Runs? by herojig · · Score: 4, Funny

    As someone who lives in Nepal, and drives a motorbike in India, the things drivers shed to pedestrians is not wanted. Like the habit of backing up and running you over again if hit, to avoid paying the family of the squashed pedestrian any compensation. Please tell drivers in the Bihar that this is not acceptable, and the practice should be stopped immediately.

    As far as ringtones for my next electric vehicle (my first was a Chinese motorbike), I will install the Tata Truck ringtone , which sounds like any other on the road. It's the one noise that instills fear in all creatures near the highway. Sounding like a cylon raider will do nothing to keep peds safe here.

    --
    I think therefore I can't be ~TTNH
  87. Who was that man in the nissan?! by kuzb · · Score: 1

    He brade wrunner!

    --
    BeauHD. Worst editor since kdawson.
  88. if it was a ringtone, they'd have to license it by vaporland · · Score: 1

    so, will Ridley Scott get a cut from every car sold that uses his "cruise" tone?

    --
    Ask Me About... The 80's!
  89. I want my car to sound like a car by jonwil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Electric cars should have the noise of cars.

    1. Re:I want my car to sound like a car by Inda · · Score: 1

      Yeah! My little electric Nissan should sound like a Ferrari V8!

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:I want my car to sound like a car by Loomismeister · · Score: 1

      GET OFF MY LAWN!

  90. Cosby by Perf · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want Bill Cosby's gocart sounds.

  91. Do Environmentalists Dream of Electric Cars? by 1337W422102 · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I've... driven things you people wouldn't believe. Set Priuses on fire off the corner of Orion Street. I watched Smart cars sputter in the dark near the Tenhauser Tunnel. All those... models will be lost in time, like... tears in the rain."

  92. vroom! by tweekie · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't using sound effects from 'The Jetsons' better simulate "a 'beautiful and futuristic' noise similar to the sound of flying cars"?

  93. what's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then how are we supposed to sneak up on pedestrians in the future?

  94. i, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i say it's time for mandatory in car techno and drum'n'bass output levels

  95. Elephants by imakemusic · · Score: 1

    I'd rather have the sound of a screaming elephant.

    --
    Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
  96. Real car sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BSEEXBhsQds#t=0m19s

  97. When car drivers stop being selfish idiots by fantomas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Pedestrians must have a sense of responsibility. All road users should do. As a cyclist, I can tell you I am very passionate in my belief that car drivers also should have a sense of responsibility and alas a small minority do not, and drive like idiots (this is also true of cyclists).

    If a person weighing 150lbs* bumps into me, I am happy enough to accept a spoken apology. Drivers of a ton of steel must take much more responsibility for their action as their mistakes KILL. I can tell you that a minority do not. When I lived in London I'd expect one near miss a week (as in possible hospitalisation) cycling to work and back in the city centre. Drivers turning without indicating and forcing me to hit the brakes/jump onto the pavement and possibly endanger pedestrians, drivers opening their car doors into the traffic a couple of metres ahead of me without checking for traffic, parked cars pulling out without checking their mirrors. Nearly been hit by them all.

    You are very right, people should behave responsibly on the road, and those people driving larger vehicles definitely must be extra careful.

    * As an aside my friend, lighten up and love yourself a bit more. "150 fleshbag" - what a terrible expression! Human bodies are fine engineering and beautiful things. Love yourself a little more. Get out and do some walking, cycle, rock climb, enjoy that body! It's what you've got to live in so love it, enjoy it, use it to the limit, don't despite it :-)

    1. Re:When car drivers stop being selfish idiots by jellybear · · Score: 1

      "150lb fleshbag" is probably rantingkitten being kind to him/herself. I am guessing rantingkitten has hardly ever walked much, less rock climbed, and is more like a 300lb lardsack.

    2. Re:When car drivers stop being selfish idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sound is only active under 12mph. at such low speeds the driver is probably in a parkinglot or neigborhood. I dunno about you but I do recall neighborhoods filled with kids running around.

      Some sound from the car would be a big safty +.

      I remeber a news story here about a couple months ago about this exact issue. Kids on the street couldnt hear that a car was coming their way and wouldnt know about it until it was right on top of em.

  98. The "bladerunner" sound is cool but a bad idea by XNormal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The sound should be as un-musical and as noiselike as possible. White noise and impulses are much easier to localize. It is almost impossible to identify the direction from which a narrowband signal is coming.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MdmPouNLTlU

    --
    Stop worrying about the risks of nuclear power and start worrying about the risks of not using nuclear power.
  99. Here in California... by BancBoy · · Score: 1

    What about the side of the road when there is no footpath?

    The vehicle code says you walk on the shoulder facing traffic if there is no foot path/sidewalk. Vehicles don't sneak up on you quite so much when they are not coming from behind you...

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
    1. Re:Here in California... by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      And if you are on a one-lane road?

  100. Ok, but... the economics are backwards by name_already_taken · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Try being blind and then guessing when it's safe to cross the road...

    I've read the articles where the blind people are freaked out by hybrid cars that they can't hear (when the car pulls away from a stop, for example). We can all understand why we want blind people to know there is a moving vehicle near them.

    The thing is, simple economics dictates that it would make far more sense to equip the blind people with car proximity sensors of some kind, rather than make every car noisy.

    There are far fewer blind people than cars. We can reasonably assume that in the future there will be many more hybrid or electric cars which produce little to no sound at low speeds.

    Imagine the benefit of having areas free from engine noise - why artificially make every car noisy just for the safety of a very small portion of the population who can't see them?

    It'd be easy enough to equip every car with something that produces ultrasonic sound or low power radio waves, and give blind people a device they can wear that will detect the car proximity signal and indicate to the blind person (perhaps by vibration) where nearby cars are.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
    1. Re:Ok, but... the economics are backwards by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The thing is, simple economics dictates that it would make far more sense to equip the blind people with car proximity sensors of some kind, rather than make every car noisy.

      Which just goes to show you that "simple" economics doesn't apply to the real world.

      We have a cheap robust solution for putting noisemakers on cars. We don't have any effective solution for equipping the blind with movement detectors, and solution for giving them some sort of gizmos would be less robust -- those would be subject to being lost, whereas it would be amazingly rare for a noisemaker to fall off a car.

      Adding a noisemaker to cars would also benefit distracted pedestrians and young children, as well as preventing accidents with animals. If it helps prevent Distracted Dave or Little Bobby or Fido from getting run over, or keeps you from plowing into a deer, that's a benefit that woudn't accrue to giving motion detectors to the blind. (Many people already add "deer whistles" to their vehicles, though evidence for their effectiveness is spotty: see here and here. The study at the second link is interesting, but the test group using the whistles was self-selected and probably represented more cautious drivers.)

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  101. Sidewalks? by __aazsst3756 · · Score: 0
    As a driver, cyclist, and pedestrian when possible, the "stay off the road" remarks are really short sighted.

    Why do you assume there is someplace to walk besides the road? In today's "car" world many small towns (i.e. population 10k) do not even bother building sidewalks, or the ones they have are 80 years old and unsafe (nothing wheeled like bicycles or wagons can traverse the offset cracks).

    In one nearby community seeing wheelchairs, baby strollers, and kids walking on a five lane 45mph road is not unusual, as the local politicians didn't bother spending the money for sidewalks when they expanded. Our town just ripped out some aging sidewalks and put grass back, leaving only the road to walk on, stating they did not have the funds to replace them. Most of the local kids (including mine) still walk to school here, so they have no choice except to walk on the streets. Not everyone lives in a walkable community like New York.

  102. Turns off at 12mph by Jim+Hall · · Score: 1

    According to the article:

    Nissan says its system would turn off after the car reaches 12 mph, when, it says, tire noise is deemed loud enough to warn a pedestrian or cyclist that a car is approaching.

    This is a good thing, IMO. I probably wouldn't want to hear that constant noise on a 4 hour road trip to anywhere.

    I just hope they found a good way for the noise to turn on/off at the 12 mph mark. I expect it slowly fades in/out, rather than just being "on" or "off". I'd hate to keep having that noise start and stop on me as my speed hovered around 12 mph.

  103. C'mon.. by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

    no one's suggested K.I.T.T.'s sound effect?

    --
    this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
  104. rejected sounds by rpillala · · Score: 1
    • TIE fighter
    • Cylon raider (new BSG)
    • A cowbell
    • that sound from the Jetsons
    • the sound of the alien probe from star trek IV
    • Dirk The Daring's fanfare
    • the flubber car
    --
    When the axe came to the forest, the trees said, "Look out - the handle was once one of us."
  105. Sounds of the future? by Froeschle · · Score: 1

    At what point will the futuristic noise become retro-futuristic?

  106. Too much noise by idr · · Score: 1

    The silence is one of the best features of electric and hybrid cars. Why is New York the city that never sleeps? Because it's so damn loud from all the cars.

  107. Darwin drives a Peterbuilt by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    This is just natural selection at work...People who are blind aren't well adapted for an environment filled with quite electric motor equipped trucks.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  108. Oooh, I have one... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Would it be in poor taste to use a recording of someone being hit by a car?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  109. Excercising personal rights by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    You seem to be missing the point of the basic social contract in a free society. You are allowed to do anything you want, provided it does not infringe upon anther's rights to life, liberty, and a pursuit of hot chicks. Operating a motor vehicle is a privilege you are granted, but the implicit understanding is that you will operate it in such a manner that you don't put other people at risk. Your statement

    It's not my job as a driver to keep idiots safe.

    is incorrect. It is exactly your responsability to keep other people safe when you exercise your right to operate a motor vehicle. If I were to take a gun into a public place and start shooting at random, it wouldn't even begin to fly with a judge if I tried to claim that I had the right to fire wildly about, and it was other people's responsibility to not get shot.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Excercising personal rights by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      It is exactly your responsability to keep other people safe when you exercise your right to operate a motor vehicle.

      Fine, it's my job not to go looking for trouble, and to avoid collisions when possible. I get that.

      But the dumb ped who just wanders out into traffic, hoping the laws of physics will be held in abeyence because the statutes say everyone should stop, is the problem -- not the drivers.

      As I said before, if, as a driver, I hit someone, then yes, I'll be in trouble, go through legal hassle, and maybe even wind up in jail. But that isn't going to help the person who is now a smear on the pavement, is it?

      Instead of wandering into traffic like an idiot because "it'll be their fault if they hit me," maybe -- and I'm just throwing this idea out here -- maybe the better course of action is to be responsible for your own safety. That means not playing in traffic. Just like your mother always said.

      Why's it viewed as such a burden to "look both ways and if cars are coming, don't walk"?

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  110. Why do I have the sick feeling by Eightbitgnosis · · Score: 1

    I'm going to see a car blaring a 10 second clip of Soulja Boy on repeat as it's sound

  111. speed of sound by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those aren't your memories, they're somebody else's"...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2TofIv30p8 ...I would love to have "The Jetsons Car" sound