Slashdot Mirror
PETA To Launch Pornography Website
The People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals are planning on launching an adult oriented website to help protect animals through a mix of animal suffering footage and porn. I'm not sure how mixing the two will win hearts, minds, or naughty bits, but Lindsay Rajt, PETA's associate director of campaigns, seems to think it's a good idea. She says, "We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."
Fuck it, we're going full-on batshit.
SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
So PETA is creating /b in other words.
...you know that it isn't. What an absurdly idiotic joke. Then again, as an above poster said, they're probably going to get an influx of /b/tards that will just fap even harder at this stuff. I hope they leave comments open. They're going to get the opposite response they were hoping for.
Animal cruelty AND naked birds? Sign me up.
I don't even...
Nothing kills a boner like a video of a raccoon dog being skinned alive for its fur.
So they're implementing Encyclopedia Dramatica?
"I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
"WTF, I thought the site meant having animals AS porn..."
So they're training people to beat off to pictures of animal suffering?
Animal porn is illegal here in the UK
I didn't think it was possible for PETA to lower my opinion of them but now they have.
What a bunch of nuts.
Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
PETAPORN.COM: Where it's OK to beat your meat.
But either we're going to be seeing something similar to snuff videos, or we're going to see a LOT more food porn involving processed meat products. Either way, I'm sure a lot of people will find themselves strangely aroused by this.
Nothing like humiliating women for the ethical treatment of animals.
two choads up!
I think it's time nature should thin the herd. By that, I mean the human herd.
And get that Kitty porn off my screen, damnit.
--Joe
I'm pretty sure that embracing the root zone poisoning .xxx domain wankers is not ever going to earn them enough cash to help a single animal in need. This is a total waste of time and money IMNSHO.
The kind of story you'd expect to see in very-late March or very-early April, but that doesn't fit the calendar in that particular universe I inhabit.
-- That grumpy BSD guy - http://bsdly.blogspot.com/
In the 80s, when we were teens sneaking copies of Hustler away from older brothers or swapping with neighbors I remember seeing several issues with both porn and horrible war footage.
Flynt was not afraid to publish articles showing exactly what kind of destruction the US was, or had been, wreaking overseas. And he showed the cost it had on the soldiers as well.
The nudity and sex were not the obscenity. The murder of civilians and the treatment of those who had signed up to serve the country was the real obscenity.
....is this new website supposed to appeal to people who get excited with both naked women and abused animals? Not sure if there is such a thing, but I know there is a "genre" of porn catering to people who like images of abused women, so it's possible.
Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
Thats cleveland-steamer-from-a-diarrheic-fruitbat crazy.
So halfway through the sex scene, right when you're about to cum, it will switch to cows being slaughtered?
"KILL THE PRIME MINISTER OF MALAYSIA!"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wleJmrlbsMc
"We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."
Yeah, 'cuz nobody would expect that from PETA.
Make me aerodynamic in the evening air
I'm sure they'll have lots of customers and raise a lot of needed cash to help with their other projects.
This will create psychotics, rather than doing *any* (perceived) good. I guarantee that.
If it gets big in the pervo circles that is. Hopefully it'll die in obscurity.
Of course this is ridiculously idiotic. That's just what they're going for. Say something batshit insane that'll provoke media coverage and public reaction to show people that PETA still exists and believes in ending the suffering of animals or whatever. They have no intention of actually doing this, it's just another cynical attention-grabbing statement to remind people about PETA.
Nothing to see here, just Slashdot getting trolled.
Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
4chan has already evolved this ( randomly, ergo /b/ ) and the evolutionary outcome was people who can only fap to shocking images of puppies having their heads cutoff juxtaposed with teen webcams or pornographic images of my little ponies.....
I don't think Rule 34 should ever be a marketing campaign.
Why PETA thinks this is a good outcome, I don't know.
-Malakai
A Dragon Lives in my Garage
Wonder if this has anything to do with PETA's previous endeavor to create genetically engineered "meat" for veggies... To hell with them.
What they're planning, from the article:
Visitors to the X-rated site will initially be presented with pornographic content as well as images from PETA's salacious ads and campaigns, Rajt said. Those images will be followed by pictures and video shot undercover of the mistreatment of animals. The site will also include links to vegetarian and vegan – using no animal products – starter kits as well as recipes.
Either way, I don't see how this works out well for their message. How about online streaming of tv shows that hulu wont stream for free - supplemented with peta ads? Or, a paypal service - watch 15 minutes of peta ads, take a quiz on their policies, pass, and get $5? The porn angle is just too strange.
PS: I don't reply to ACs.
A Goatse for the 21st century.
I'm 99% sure there's a decent goatse joke in here somewhere.
I'm also 100% sure this is old news. Consumerist and the Daily Mail reported on it a month ago.
Supersadomasochistinecrobestiality.
Its when you get a hard-on making Lassie a fatality!
...
"give the dog a bone"...
... but it is perfectly ok to use people as objects. The previous sentence was supposed to be sarcastic, but I'm not sure anymore. Not only do they use the very animals they want to protect to get the attention and money (They show the films of dying animals to fill their coffers) but then they have animal actors in their commercials and the like. They attempt to show that animals are higher beings then we think they are by anthropomorphizing them. But at the same time, they attempt to show that we are worse than the animals with crap like this (and the holocaust). Oh well, that is what you get with extremists (and don't even get me started with my neighbors who put their animals on a vegetable diet and then sued the vet for all the illnesses and deaths this malnutrition caused).
...some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site.
Aaaand you just ruined it. So yeah, probably not going to surprise anyone now. And what in fuckery are they even trying to do?
Trying to wrap my head around what they hope to accomplish has annoyed me so much, I'm going to go out right now and buy a huge freakin steak for dinner, so I can chew on chunks of nearly-raw beef while I think of other ways to piss PETA off.
Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
After all, PETA is one of the most prolific killers of animals in the country.
I came here for Rule 34, and I got it. So now, we're deliberately trying to see if we can get people to like violence and porn... but with animals.(the violence) And, to get everyone behind it under the guise of something else and quite opposite as well... evil lords over stupidity everyday.
Like a city whose walls are broken down is a man who lacks self-control.
But will they carry "Big Sausage Pizza"?
I guess it brings a whole new meaning to "clubbing your seal".
Could a revival of alt.sex.bestiality.hamster.duct-tape be far behind?
I wanted to make sure it wasn't April 1st.
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. blah blah blah
Hey, is this enough comment to pass the filter that says I have to say something more than what I can squeeze into the subject line?
First off, when it comes to art at Burning Man, pretty much anything goes. However, PETA's "art" consisted of a film loop of pigs being beaten to death, shown on a 15-foot screen, complete with sound. They placed this on the Esplanade, Burning Man's "main street." My camp was next door, and while we didn't actually do any of the following pranks, thinking them up was great fun.
Our first prank was to go over with a plate of veal chops:
Us: "Hi, guys. We're from BBQ camp, next door, and ... we're full. Would you like some veal chops? We're just going to throw them out."
Our next prank:
Us: "Hi, guys. We're so glad that you've taken the first step toward a sustainable planet by becoming vegan. But we hope that you'll take the next ethical step like we have. We're from Fruitarian camp, next door, and we would like to invite you to join us in embracing a fruitarian lifestyle, and avoid all but fruit that falls naturally from the tree."
PETA: "If you guys are all fruitarians, how come you're all so fat?"
Me: "Well, I can only speak for myself, but I've been a fruitarian now for a month, and already I've lost over 50 pounds. I feel great, and expect to be at my goal weight in just 10 more days."
For our final prank, we planned to go masturbate in front of their pig-killing video:
Us: "uhhh. Uhhhh. UUHHHH, Oh Yes!"
PETA: "WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU PEOPLE DOING?"
Us: "Oh, hey, sorry. We're from Bestiality Camp, next door. We were just enjoying the snuff films you guys are showing."
I think it will just encourage sexual abuse of animals among some small subset of the porn-loving crowd. Of course, the rest of that set won't be able to get it up anymore without some serious Viagra, so it could be an overall win for the anti-porn crowd.
This will backfire like bra-burning, and be lulzworthy into the bargain.
"This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
I've no doubt there are some sick, twisted people out there who are gonna get off on the animal cruelty pics. :(
I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
You know what, I'm not even gonna bother touching this. I'm going to go forget that I ever read this for the sake of remaining sane.
"...the number of UNIX installations has grown to 10, with more expected..." - Dennis Ritchie/Ken Thompson, 1972
Who are the ad wizards that came up with this idea?
I'm just "this guy", you know?
I know what you mean. When I had ferrets I saw so many posts from vegetarians and vegans wanting to know what kind of veggie diet to feed their ferrets.
Veggie? They're CARNIVORES! Not just that, they're obligate carnivores, they have to eat meat to survive, no other option.
Want a veggie diet for your pet? Get a rabbit.
I suspect that this is not really about raising awareness, but funding for PETA, or else PETA is even crazier than I think they are.
I had to look into it, because it seemed to be a bit of a stretch, even for PETA. But damned if you weren't correct about that. Here's one of the links for folks interested. http://www.abolitionistapproach.com/eight-animals/
Not only that but they actively fund domestic terrorists. So no big deal in their books. After all, they believe animals have more intrinsic value than you, or me, or that baby of yours, mine, or anyone elses that could be saved using a vaccine. Or stem cell treatment, or heart valve replacement or hell even insulin.
Om, nomnomnom...
I wonder if they'll shift from wholesale slaughtering puppies to trampling them with high heels?
www.petakillsanimals.com
Ok,
So this actually makes a whole lot of sense logically if they really were/are doing it. I didn't read anything other than the headline on Slashdot so keep this in mind. First I'll start off by saying I eat meat am not into animals sexually and despite all that I'm not against improving the conditions of animals or even necessarily reducing the number of animals killed for food.
It doesn't really matter of if you accept or not PETA actions or philosophy here.
The thing to think about is the main idea of reducing harm or suffering. They potentially are able to do that through the production of pornographic material with animals. There will always be nut cases which will do the real thing even with plenty of pornographic material available and that shouldn't impact to do or not to do. The majority who like animal porn go out and produce it if they can't get it any other way. If anything the production of material will reduce the *need* for those who are into it from producing it themselves. Given the state of law and societal conditions chances are those people are not able to do it in a safe or humane way so producing it for them is quite rational.
This is a problem of society/law and not really one of those with this sexual orientation. Your personal disgust should be taken out of the equation. Something the majority of people can't do. If you can't do that you shouldn't be making judgements. Just stay away from reading about or viewing this material.
When you aren't a puritan sex can be healthy, safe, and enjoyable for all. It doesn't have to be a disgusting or dirty act (ok, some might enjoy that, but this is besides the point). It doesn't have to be with a man or woman.
And once again. I repeat. I am not into animal sex. Well. I should probably take that back. I do like people and people are animals.... so... maybe I do like animal sex after all.
Well, PETA has always been more about getting laid then actually helping animals.. so this fits their pattern quite nicely.
They don't love animals, they just hate people.
"We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."
Come here my little puppy, now lick mommy, lick it, lick it good for mommy.
ewwwwwww yech.
This will have the opposite effect. Next thing you know, people are going to begin associating dead animals with sexual arousal. This will become yet another fetish.
This sounds like aversion therapy. People will begin to associate pr0n with suffering animals and not want to view it any more.
Leave it to PETA to drain the fun out of our lives!
Live nude animals! Dirty bitches who only do it doggie style! Pussies doing things that have to be seen to be believed! Only on the PETA (People for the Erotic Treatment of Animals) website!
No, really. This can only work out great for everyone involved.
gimee gimee
Bukowski said it. I believe it. That settles it.
If we are talking about PETA Porn, we might be in for disappointment. Are they producing it themselves? Anybody got pictures?
This PETA porn site will attract sadistic sociopaths who like to combine sex, abuse, and torture. Who knows, maybe they will kick off a few new serial killers.
There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
Beavers, pussies and goatses will be just some of the things on offer.
"We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
Meet the Feebles By Peter Jackson
I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
...unless you beat your meat.
... this will be an udder failure.
Can't you see those poor girls are desperate for sex and attention? But they can't just say it, na-ah, because they will be called sluts. So... It's all for the poor fluffies! It's OK for a girl to care about bunnies and kittens, isn't it? And that's exactly why they've been posing naked and now move on to full sex in front of a camera. Yeah, that'll be why.
I guess they need more money to fund their mobile euthanasia machines. If you give an animal to PETA, its probably dead before they leave the driveway.
http://www.petakillsanimals.com/
If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
this is a common misconception. PETA kills more animals than any other organization because they are a home of last resort - most animals they find are too sick and/or abused to be kept alive, and facilitating their deaths peacefully rather than making them suffer is their goal. Also, they take in animals that other shelters can't keep - animals too aggressive, or old, or sick, etc.
Also, the terrorist bullshit has been debunked.
http://www.consumerfreedom.com/news_detail.cfm/h/2339-peta-and-terrorism-the-real-deal
That article is decidedly anti-PETA but it still somehow manages to support my argument. While I don't agree with their methods I fail to see how even blowing up a facility in order to free animals being tested on counts as Terrorism(tm) if you're not targeting people. Prior to the patriot act it would have been considered a simple criminal act, destruction of property or something more severe but not *terrorism.*
TL;DR: PETA is dumb as shit for this rule 34 nonsense but not half as evil as you make them out to be.
Ugh. Just grossed myself out.
Totally agree.
Advocacy Group Decries PETA's Inhumane Treatment Of Women
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q2z2lTUR5Ao
What really scares me is the accuracy that The Onion can predict future trend. First it was the Gilette 5 bladed razor (skipping 4) and now it is PETA. Sort of. http://www.theonion.com/video/advocacy-group-decries-petas-inhumane-treatment-of,14359/
Advocacy Group Decries PETA's Inhumane Treatment Of Women
Watch it, it's spot on.
The ironic thing is that the men are more like objects than women in porn (not that I think either actually are). Just think about it. How many pornstars can you name that are women and how many that are men (or that many of you will think of women when the neutral term "pornstar" is used)? How about that women are the ones that control the entire industry with what they are comfortable with. The fact that most porn films are sold by the women in them and not the men. The fact that most (if not all) of what you see of the man in the film is just the penis. And don't say that women could be replaced with no change because the same can be said for the men, as well as any other type of movie made. Yeah, the women are mere objects.
I am going to meander off the topic at hand for a moment. Many laws are written and enforced against humanity simply because the aristocracy thinks of the common man as an animal. You will see many legal documents with phrases such as "man, and other animals" or "humans, and other animals" etc... This allows the NWO to skirt many government's Common Law because they are now applying laws against humans as if they were animals, and so they are someone's property instead. So many laws and regulations, particularly in the green movement are meant to decline man's status down to that of the common animal or anything else which may be regulated as someone's property without it's own intrinsic rights. On the flipside of that, groups like PETA are used to further causes that ultimately result in animals or groups of certain animals to be treated as people. The eventual goal is for the vote of animals to be considered when passing legislation. Now since animals are generally not very intelligent or capable of RELIABLY communicating with humans (think of the drug-sniffing dog that eventually starts "hitting" on every search because it's learned to get a biscuit each time), someone (i.e. government agency or associated lobby) will speak on behalf of said animal or animal group, usurping their votes.
Imagine the majority of 7 billion people trying to to vote for choice A while the government selects and enforces choice B because they claim that 40 quadrillion cockroaches overruled you. This sounds far-fetched but it has been proposed before. Even in ancient history you had strangenesses like Caligula marrying his horse. As soon as you give something like a cow a "vote", you leave it up to the interpretation of whoever has the control of the army to determine what is in the cow's best interest. It's sort of a way to dupe only the most brain-dead of hippies and conformists that it was a fair election and that that's what the majority of "the people" (i.e. cockroaches, ants, and amoeba) wanted.
Coming back to the topic a bit, the lower hierarchy of PETA and other groups such as the "green movement" are useful idiots: they really believe in their plight and are sincere, though ignorant. It's the upper echelons that use these seemingly simple ideas to further their hegemony.
PETA's more about getting attention than they are about the ethical treatment of animals. This move just further proves that.
Once upon a time monkey spanking used to mean just that.
Now, PETA will show you pictures of spanked monkeys while you monkey spank.
There is a market for this out there, I'm sure.
Alongside farmyard fun etc....
how even blowing up a facility in order to free animals being tested on counts as Terrorism(tm) if you're not targeting people.
Terrorism doesn't have to target people by direct violence. So long as the intent is to force others into accepting some political or ideological point through fear (whether of violence against them, or destruction against their property), and it is practiced systematically, it is terrorism.
How many more chickens need to be choked before America listens?
They want to shock people.
On the internet.
With graphic images.
On a porn site.
Weeeeeelll... its good to have goals I guess. Good luck with that one.
'Hey Bob. Why did you become a vegan?'
'Glad you asked. This is a really funny story. The other day I was browsing for porn as usual when...'
Those PETA genius! This will keep the comedians occupied for ages...
There was a local band called Pleasuretech that played videos during their concerts that included a medley of explosions, politician's speeches and hardcore porn. It was always fun when the cops would roll in and shut down the show (not that they had many before disbanding).
Fun times.
Here I was thinking this was from the Peta who graces the pages of Page 3
Porn AND animal abuse at the same place?! Michael Vick is gonna love this!
> They're going to get the opposite response they were hoping for.
And PETA apparently never learned about "classical conditioning". When you pair one stimulus (the smell of food) with another (ringing a bell), soon the presentation of just the second stimulus (ringing the bell) will result in the effects of the first stimulus (salivating).
(I remember my textbook in college explained how the author was turned on by the smell of onions because he used to date a girl who ate a lot of onions.)
So...
When you pair one stimulus (pornography) with another (animal suffering), soon the presentation of just the second stimulus (animal suffering) will result in the effects of the first stimulus (sexual arousal).
Somehow I don't think that's what they're going for. Unless they've been trolling us all these years and this is their real plan...
I'm a psychologist (amongst other things).
Will it be self-made? Will there be hot PETA chicks doing porn?
Everyone seems to be going around the obvious issue - Porn stagnation.
PETA has effectively created a new opening for more interesting (as far as the internet is concerned) porn. One which mixes shock and pleasure.
Kind of like gambling, you don't know what you will see and when.
Expect this to go mainstream by 2012.
Oh way to go peta, now we've got to come up with a name for this new fetish, that you just created !
So PETA thinks it's smart to mix snuff and porn. Nice going guys, promoting the combination of sex and animal torture.
I really, REALLY hope they run afoul of snuff-porn/"crush" video laws and have some folks getting 25-to-life.
Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
PETAbytes of Pr0n!
Maybe Pamela Anderson will be their first star!
(Watch as she rapes the Colonel before he can say 'KFC'!)
soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
My first thought - a bestiality site with a tag line of "Animals need love too". ;-)
So long as the intent is to force others into accepting some political or ideological point through fear (whether of violence against them, or destruction against their property), and it is practiced systematically, it is terrorism.
So long as it's not the law enforcement arm of the government doing the coercion, of course...
I welcome our new 99% overlords.
OK, so everyone on the planet decides to stop eating meat. What do we do with all the animals (cows, pigs, goats, ect.).
Only so long as it does that according to the law (I don't have a problem with someone refraining from murder because they're afraid of being caught).
Stileproject did it first.
"We're hoping to reach a whole new audience of people, some of whom will be shocked by graphic images that maybe they didn't anticipate seeing when they went to the PETA triple-X site."
In other words, "We know we're wingnut extremists, and we can only get people to listen to our insane screed if we lie to them about what we're going to say."
Nothing new about that, from PETA.
I plan on recording a video of myself beating off to said snuff, and sending it back to PETA with a big "Thank You" note for ending 30 years of blue balls.
-Billco, Fnarg.com
already done. http://motherless.com/videos/recent
The really important question...will it have a beastiality section/category?
To getting their brainwashed acolytes to become full fledged whores!
Bravo PETA -- you've listened to the online community of 18 - 100 year old males applauding the nude PETA girlie protestors and listened. What a way to fulfill market demand!
Personally, I too am not a supporter of women wearing fur.
Have gnu, will travel.
They're doing to humans what farmers do to cows when they brand them. They're feeding them poisonous plants and then branding them to produce a pain response and associating it with the poison. In our case they're associating sex with animal abuse. Sex produces very strong feelings in humans, if you combine that with a extremely opposite feeling (such as sadness and/or disgust) you will be quite a bit more likely to remember it.
They're training humans to have a extreme disgust for animal abuse by conditioning the with the stimulus of sex.
This is remarkably cruel and may result in a lot of people becoming sexually impotent due to the fact that they can't get aroused, because whenever they do, they think about animal brutality... funny how that works.
There is Porn about it!
I guess a kill/save ratio of 99:1 is an option for last resort because in newkirk's own words "it's the best option to save them from people" She's a nutbar, she's believes groups like ALF are wonderful great people. Including the support of individual who go into highschools to teach kids how to build bombs as acts of 'civil disobedience' right. I dunno I guess back in my day, civil disobedience was something else. Rather than trying to kill or maim someone.
No PETA is evil. The reality is we've only scratched the depths of their depravity and material connections to the 'earth first' type movements.
Om, nomnomnom...
So it's kinda like 4chan then?
I JUst dont get it
Challenge accepted.
Nothing will ever be more horrific than the blue waffle. Nothing.
People Exposing Tits and Ass
I wonder though...are we still allowed to spank the monkey? Or choke the chicken? They have a rough time I tell ya. Or are we just limited to carefully stroking the one-eyed snakes?
Today PETA announced they have acquired the web site 4chan and will be using it, unmodified, as a promotional and educational tool to help protect animals through a mix of animal suffering footage and porn.
- For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat
kitty porn sorry not really
Republican leadership = Idiocracy
So...to make me be more sensitive to animals, they put up a bunch of videos of porn and animal cruelty next to each other? Riiiiight.
Next up: The American Heart Association makes a porn website devoted to people having sex while eating fast food followed by heart attacks.
So what you're saying is that Robert Poole needs to register 4chan.xxx ? I don't think there'd be any noticable difference.
Porn and Animals? Hasn't this been done before??
I've always thought those freaks were sickos. I hope they post the pics of Bridget Bardot when she lost her left nipple to exposure doing a "Fur is Rude, I'd Rather Go Nude" website on an iceflow full of harp seals.
Modern pornography fits perfectly with PETA's objective to get women to stop wearing fur...
Some noobs think that protecting the Panda just because it is cute and cuddly leaves many other species in the lurch. What about the non-cuddly animals?
Well, they are living in the same area. Panda does well, they do well.
QI had a nice example of this. There is a lice that is in danger since it lives on only one animal. But who cares about lice?
But the animal they live on is a cute pig. Protect the cute pig, protect the lice. No need for sea kittins, protect the otters, the seals and the whales (all photogenic as hell) and the fish follow right along.... oh okay, so not the fish that get eaten but the fish in general.
Most of PETA is just angsty kids who rage against their parents for only caring about money and not giving them enough pocket money. The worsed thing they do is they give the right wingers a weapon to ridicule anyone who thinks killing of the entire world might not be a good idea.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
So will they be posting videos of their celebrity supporters? I mean they actually did convince some to pose nude, maybe they'll talk them into doing PETA porn.
PETA has been photographing naked women for years. So this isn't that big of a surprise
"So PETA's gonna launch a porn site to raise awareness of veganism?
I think I'm gonna broil a steak to raise awareness of sexual exploitation."
I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
FBI to PETA: Put up a site that will allow us to capture embryonic serial killers or we'll put you out of business.
PETA: Hmmmm????
Most people who are in peta must have sex with animals so they figure if they show us sex and animals will get the same idea and join there cause makes perfect since WERE ALL GANNA BE SHEEP FUCKERS :D
So, a year after the site opens will I get to here someone who frequents it say, "You know, it's gotten to the point that I can't even get a boner unless a kick dog."
...I'm done.
Whoever came up with this is severely f***** in the head!
I think my irony meter exploded at this post being made by SmallFurryCreature.
"Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
There's a plain logic in PETA's plan: where do we get the most exposure (woops)? What's the bulk of internet traffic about? Does sex sell?
The thing about radicals is, while they're associated with madness, delusions and confused thinking, they just rely more on logic. You take a train of thought and follow it to the logical conclusion. Of course the critics won't see it, since all silly conclusions can only be caused by bad logic.
Maybe it could work too. Depends on how they infuse their message in the entertainment part. Do it wrong and you attract very weird people.
"animal suffering footage"
I'd jerk off to that. Thanks, PETA!
ah, People Eating Tasty Animals :P
bought a package of chicken nuggets, a frozen pepperoni pizza and 2 pounds of cheese yesterday, just for you.
I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
Hail the return of alt.binaries.hamster.duct.tape - It was only a matter of time ! LOL
"Computers are a lot like Air Conditioners" "They both work great until you start opening Windows"
I guess they want to draw the "animal torture fetish" crowd.
People who Eat Tasty Animals.
Take the case of a mother cat and her perfectly adoptable young kittens at a vet's office in North Carolina. The PETA criminals showed up promising to find them homes, immediately killed them in the back of the van and dropped them in a dumpster behind a Piggly Wiggly. This was not an isolated incident.
They also just by default kill pit bulls. For the record, I met a very nice one this weekend, very gentle and playful with my kids, and perfectly obedient to his owner. The PETA would kill it if they got their hands on it. PETA encourages all shelters to enact this policy.
The peeps at /b/ would probably find this a turn on. Normal people are not going to find seeing tortured chickens as anything other than a libido killer, even with Sasha Grey on the same page.
...you constructed. The ability to post porn and graphic gore porn images is insignificant next to the power of 4Chan!
Do we really need to see Pamela Anderson naked again?
PETA's real position (actually quite reasonable):
Approximately 6 to 8 million animals are handled by animal shelters in the United States each year. Even though some are reclaimed or adopted, nearly 4 million unwanted dogs and cats are left with nowhere to go.(1) Shelters cannot humanely house and support all these animals until their natural deaths—they would be forced to live in cramped cages or kennels for years, lonely and stressed, and other animals would have to be turned away because there would not be room for them.
Turning unwanted animals loose to roam the streets is not a humane option. If they don’t starve, freeze, get hit by a car, or die of disease, they may be tormented and possibly killed by cruel juveniles or picked up by dealers who obtain animals to sell to laboratories.
Good and Bad Solutions
Because of the high number of unwanted companion animals and the lack of good homes, sometimes the most humane thing that a shelter worker can do is give an animal a peaceful release from a world in which dogs and cats are often considered “surplus” and unwanted. PETA, The American Veterinary Medical Association, and The Humane Society of the United States concur that an intravenous injection of sodium pentobarbital administered by a trained professional is the kindest, most compassionate method of euthanizing animals. The American Humane Association considers this to be the only acceptable method of euthanasia for cats and dogs in animal shelters.
Injections into the hearts of conscious animals are not acceptable. Inhalants, decompression, drowning, electrocution, shooting, and other methods are also unacceptable because they rarely provide an instant death and cause suffering before death occurs.
Some drugs can cause discomfort if injected too quickly or at too high a dose, and some, such as strychnine, can cause animals to experience violent convulsions, muscle contractions, or cardiac arrest.
Nitrous oxide, halothane, and carbon monoxide gases can be expensive and unreliable and can cause irritation or excitability in animals. Carbon monoxide poisoning causes animals to suffer horribly while they are slowly suffocated. They often scream and go into convulsions while struggling for air. Carbon monoxide poisoning has been outlawed in California, Tennessee, Maryland, and Rhode Island but is still used in many animal shelters throughout the U.S.(2,3)
The physical methods used to kill animals in shelters include shooting, electrocution, and decompression. The obvious problem with shooting is the potential for extreme pain if the person handling the gun is not competent, if the animal is struggling, or if the bullet is deflected and the animal survives. Electrocution can be extremely painful and traumatic and doesn’t always work.
Decompression chambers simulate an ascent to thousands of feet above sea level in a matter of minutes. At many shelters that use this method, decompression occurs at speeds up to 15 times faster than the recommended rate. At this speed, the gases in animals’ sinuses, middle ears, and intestines expand quickly, causing considerable discomfort or severe pain.(4) Accidental recompression can occur when equipment malfunctions, when there is a personnel error, or when small animals become trapped in air pockets. They must then be put through the procedure all over again.
Until dog and cat overpopulation is brought under control through spaying and neutering, we must prevent the suffering of unwanted animals in the most responsible and humane way possible. Euthanasia, performed properly, is often the most compassionate option.
A Compassionate Goodbye
When animal companions become very sick and are suffering with no hope of recovery, and they seem incapable of truly enjoying life, it may be time to provide them with a peaceful death through euthanasia. Ask your veterinarian to talk frankly with you, and consider getting a second opinion if you are in doubt. Be sure that you are not prol
Then I realised that the original link was to the Torygraph. Which explains it. Rampant lunacy, plus total absence of fact-checking ; QED. The spoof is on them.
Taking my holidays next year in San Serriffe, assuming I can find it again.
Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"