Slashdot Mirror


Analyzing the New MacBook Pro

MrSeb writes "Late yesterday, Apple released a next-generation 15-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display. It has a 2880×1800 220 PPI display. The normal 13- and 15-inch MacBook Pros and MacBook Airs have also been updated, but the 17-inch MBP has been retired, in effect replaced by the new Retina display MBP. Without a doubt, this new laptop is an engineering marvel in the same league as the original iPhone or MacBook Air. ... The Retina display MBP really looks nothing we've ever seen before. Here, ExtremeTech dives into the engineering behind the laptop, paying close attention to that new and rather shiny display — and the fact that this thing has no user-replaceable parts at all." Fleshing things out a bit more, iFixit has a teardown of the internals. Their verdict: effectively unrepairable by the user.

659 of 914 comments (clear)

  1. has no user-replaceable parts at all by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And it's made by Apple?
    shocking.
    Next I suppose you're going to tell me the battery in my iPod can't be replaced like my other MP3 player could.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Informative

      It can be replaced it is just a huge pain to do so. I have done some ipod battery replacements and no the average non-slashdotter can't do it. The average slashdotter should be able to though, or should not be on slashdot.

    2. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can't build a machine like that using off-the-shelf parts. I'm sure OWC will come to the rescue with an SSD upgrade, just like they did for the Air.

    3. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So have I, but we're not normal users. I'm actually not a user at all, except for a third generation ipod in my truck -- I got the special tools and a line on several parts suppliers because the disposable mentality of the Apple product line just annoys the hell out of me. I offer repair/refurbish services to family, friends, friends-of-friends because I get satisfaction out of spoiling Apple's throw-away stand-in-line-for-new-model paradigm. And that it's more environmentally moral to keep the older devices in play.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    4. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can't replace the battery in the Galaxy Tab, either, but nobody around here sharpened their pitchforks over it.

      Oh, on an unrelated note: Battery life on the Tab is pretty good.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    5. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by DurendalMac · · Score: 2

      You mean iPod Touch or click-wheel iPod? The latter really isn't that tough.

    6. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by necro81 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I really enjoyed my 3rd-gen iPod. That 10 GB sucker kept me in good listening mode for about five years. Eventually, the hard drive crapped out. I still have it, though it is difficult to see how much use it would be unless I replaced the hard drive and battery - assuming I could even find replacement parts. It's particularly difficult to see how useful it would be, when my wife has a (still functioning) 120-GB iPod that is thinner, lighter, longer-playing, more capacious, and has a color screen and video-out capability.

    7. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

      By offering those repair services you add value to Apple's product, thereby encouraging Apple's business model. The right thing to do is guide those who ask to offerings that are owner friendly, and if they still choose to go with Apple let them be bitten by the consequences of that decision.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "disposable mentality of the Apple product line"

      How many normal people do you think ever upgrade any piece of electronics they own, by themselves? Cell phone batteries were about the only thing user replaceable until companies realized that people were just chucking their phones after two years anyway.

      I consider the slight hassle (have to find screwdriver!) of changing the "non-replaceable" battery in an iPhone once every couple of years, for example, much better than having an externally accessible battery fall out periodically.

      It IS too bad they're soldering the RAM, but again, I'd much rather have a lighter, more durable notebook and buy my RAM now, than save maybe $100 by buying it next year. If you disagree, there are lots of plastic monsters to choose from other manufacturers.

    9. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by gmack · · Score: 1

      It already exists. The SSD drive is just a mini PCIe card with enough of an interface to make it look like SATA to the OS and you can slot that card into almost any notebook built in the last 5 years if you don't mind losing your WiFi card. I saw something similar on Aliexpress months ago when I was looking to dual drive my notebook and there versions for the older mini PCI slot as well.

    10. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by noh8rz3 · · Score: 1

      the ipad battery can be replaced by apple for $129. you give them your ipad, they give you a refurbished ipad. Not sure how they're going to replace the batteries on the macbook pro with retina display. I will be paying close attention to this issue.

    11. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by gmack · · Score: 1

      At first glance it looked like a mini PCI slot but when I took a closer look at the picture with he motherboard connectors it's much wider than the mini PCIe so my post was incorrect.

    12. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Microlith · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I consider the slight hassle (have to find screwdriver!) of changing the "non-replaceable" battery in an iPhone once every couple of years, for example, much better than having an externally accessible battery fall out periodically.

      Funny, in the near 3 years I've owned my N900 the battery has not fallen out once. Perhaps your problem lies not with the existence of a readily replaceable battery but with poor manufacturing processes.

    13. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by synapse7 · · Score: 1

      Maybe, the intention is that it is a user replaceable part.

    14. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I had a Droid 1 for 20 months the battery did not fallout once. I have had a galaxy nexus for 2 months the battery has not fallen out once.

      What phones with removable batteries have this issue?

    15. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny

      if they still choose to go with Apple let them be bitten by the consequences of that decision.

      in capitalist america, apple bites you!

    16. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by s73v3r · · Score: 2

      My Phillips GoGear 30gig MP3 player didn't have a user replaceable battery either. And it used to have FM recording capabilities until they were dropped in an update. Apple is hardly the most egregious violator in this realm.

    17. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right. But people who are not geeks should have a better option than just throwing away a perfectly good device just because the culture says that this is acceptable. That offends me. I get some small solace in the fact that every device I repair is one less new device purchased.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    18. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Stewie241 · · Score: 2

      I think this used to happen with my Xperia X10 quite frequently when it was dropped. I have a rubber case on it now though and it no longer happens.

    19. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The connector is called mSATA, and its a real SATA port.

      --
      Good-bye
    20. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      > How many normal people do you think ever upgrade any piece of electronics they own, by themselves?

      Just about everyone I know have at some point replaced their battery or upgraded their SD card (or have multiple cards), even my mother-in-law, and she's in her seventies and has never been a geek. Except for the people I know who own Apple products, where it is not part of the culture to do so.

      An Apple user has a different perspective on this. If you have to be Apple certified to replace the battery in your macbook, not many regular users could do that. But a seven year old can replace a battery in a thinkpad. (I've seen one do so.)

      It's important, I think, to agree to a common definition of terms. Non-Apple users, for instance, don't consider replacing the battery to be an "upgrade".

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    21. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed. I've owned several Palm Pilots, Trios, dumb phones and android phones over the years, all with battery doors and externally accessible batteries, and can't think of a single instance of a battery falling out. My current DroidX has a battery so firmly in place that a little ejector tab exists to get it out.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    22. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I'm racking my brains for an example. The first Blackberry Bold had a door catch issue which would cause the back to fall off (fixed in subsequent designs) but even then, with the battery (gasp) exposed to the air, I don't remember it ever falling out.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    23. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      On the droid I replaced the battery very frequently as I had two batteries that I would swap out. This is because I was often using the device for work while out and about. So far on the GN I have not yet bought a backup battery.

    24. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by CaptainJeff · · Score: 4, Informative

      The right thing to do is...

      ...always a matter of perspective. The iPod (and a lot of Apple's devices) offers a far superior interface and experience for the vast majority of users. If my mom buys an iPod and it breaks and she's upset, I will argue that the "right thing" for me to since, since I have the capabilities to fix it would be to do so. By doing so, I increase my mom's happiness, I get to undertake a fun little technical challenge, and both me and my mom are happy. If instead, I "guide" her to buying a user-serviceable device that she hates to use due to an inferior interface from her perspective, then she's lost money, doesn't have a device she likes, and she's mad at me. I cannot see how that would be the right thing to do.

    25. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      I love my iPhone, but it would be extremely cool if I could pop out the battery, mostly because that means I could keep a 2nd charged one in my bag in the event that I used it heavily and drained it in the middle of the day.

      When (if?) the day comes where portable batteries can power a system (phone/laptop/whatever) for a solid 12-16 hour day, then I'll be totally behind sealed-in batteries -- I can always plug the thing in at night, and I don't mind deconstructing it or sending it in once every 3 years.

    26. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Batteries are cheap and 128GB Solid State IDE PATA drives are available in the 1.8" form factor now. You could build an amazingly fast and capacious retro iPod.

    27. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's actually not.

      While Apple uses the latest SATA protocol, the connector is physically incompatible with either Mini PCIe or mSATA.

    28. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I just checked my Asus Transformer. SHIT NO BATTERY BOX. Let me go get my pitchforks. We can storm these companies together.

    29. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Vegemeister · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd much rather have a lighter, more durable notebook and buy my RAM now, than save maybe $100 by buying it next year.

      Factory-installed ram is three times as expensive as what you can get on Newegg now, and this holds for pretty much every laptop vendor. Face it, the new MBP is a $2100 machine with only 8 GiB of memory, and if you want more you have to pay an extra $200.

    30. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by fa2k · · Score: 1

      Cell phone batteries were about the only thing user replaceable until companies realized that people were just chucking their phones after two years anyway.

      It's nice to be able to pop the battery if you spill some liquid on the phone/laptop or to reset a phone that's locked up. Sure, neither happens frequently, but I'd easily trade 5mm of extra thickness for a removable battery in a laptop.

    31. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by stewbacca · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My old iPod was more expensive to repair than a brand new iPod with 4x the storage capacity. I wasn't offended and just bought a new one instead. In fact, I was quite stoked.

    32. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Tobenisstinky · · Score: 1, Informative

      Exactly; this isn't an Apple thing, it's becoming an industry thing. My Le Pan tablet - non user replaceable battery, Motorola blue tooth hands-free unit, same, my Vtech cordless phone, user replaceable, but batteries are only available from Vtech. Sooner or later companies will figure out that they can do the same thing with batteries as they did with ink cartridges.

      --
      wha'? where am i?
    33. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Holy crap, check out your username. I bow down to all the years you waited to make that joke!

    34. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You could buy your RAM elsewhere today for a fraction of the money Apple screws out of you. Making the parts non-replaceable is not a matter of convenience for you, it's a matter of profit for Apple.

    35. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you're going to go to the expense & trouble of carrying around a spare battery, then go buy a mophie powerstation or similar, and voila: 2nd charged battery in your bag in the event you use it heavily and drained it in the middle of the day.

      If you're carrying around phone + spare battery, does it *REALLY* matter to you that the battery doesn't go INSIDE the phone, with the replaced (discharged) battery banging around loose in your bag instead? Get a Powerstation for $59.95, and at full charge, it provides 2500 mAh of power; The iPhone 4S has an internal 1430 mAh battery, so it's NEARLY the equivalent of 2x the internal capacity, meaning you'd have the equivalent of 2.75 full charges to run on.

      Bonus: The Mophie powerstation, (at least - I suspect other models will work similarly, but the powerstation is the only one I own), will also power any other device that charges over a USB cable. I've used it to dump a charge into a point-and-shoot camera, an iPod, and a Blackberry, as well as an iPhone. Better than carrying spare batteries for all those devices, no?

      It's like people don't realize these options exist, or that the options are functionally identical to "carrying around an extra battery." You can either carry around Phone + extra battery, and swap it in and out, or you can carry around Phone + extra batter, and simply plug the extra battery into your phone when it's getting low.

    36. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 2

      the slight hassle (have to find screwdriver!)

      Just wait until he finds out that it's a proprietary screwdriver that requires yet more money...

    37. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      This is actually a big departure from the model that I own. Ok, it's a 2009 MacBook Pro so it's a bit older but I can (and have) upgrade the memory, hard drive, add an SSD, take out the DVD. It's fairly easy to do as well. In fact, the HD is much more accessible on the MacBook than it is on many of the PC's that I've worked on. The new MacBook looks stunning with that retina display and all but I'm not sure that I want to buy something that I can't hack :-)

    38. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Kumiorava · · Score: 1

      When I bought my Nokia 1610 around 1997 I listened the salesmen and purchased an extra battery with the phone. I never used that battery. Only time I had extra battery after that was with my Thinkpad T40 to extend the battery life when CD/DVD drive was removed. Since then I have never needed to replace any of the batteries on my devices and there has been many devices. Of course faulty battery goes under warranty, but that has never happened to me.

      I just need to remember few things, Lithium batteries like to stay charged, Nickel based batteries like to run full cycle and charge full. With these rules I have managed to keep my devices in working condition for years. As a summary I can say that user replaceable batteries are a non-issue for me, never needed to replace one.

    39. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Don't take one thing and extrapolate it out and say everything is ok. Re-read the last line of the summary: effectively unrepairable by the user This isn't a cordless phone or a bluetooth unit. It's a $2000+ laptop. You cannot upgrade RAM, harddrive, or install a new screen. You need the warranty or care service sold by Apple. This is like the auto manufacturer welding your hood shut.

    40. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      > The iPod (and a lot of Apple's devices) offers a far superior

      It hasn't done that in quite a long time.

      The lead that Apple had on other vendors in this regard is ancient history.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    41. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I'm not stupid enough to think that wasting money is something to brag about.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    42. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by citylivin · · Score: 1

      I guess a tab is not like a nexus? Nexus the battery couldn't be easier to replace.

      Perhaps you didn't do the proper research before buying your phone.

      FYI, every phone i have ever had has had a user replaceable battery. Period. Anything less would be a horrible design flaw as the battery WILL fail or fail to hold a charge after several hundred charge cycles (could be much lower based on usage and care). Perhaps you purchased a device with planned obsolescence built in. But aside from apple, this is not normal "industry standard" practice.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    43. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > You can't replace the battery in the Galaxy Tab, either, but nobody around here sharpened their pitchforks over it.

      Nobody is forced to use the Galaxy Tab if they want to run Android on a tablet.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    44. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Buggy whips are perfectly repairable, as are steam engines. The problem? Running them is infinitely more expensive than upgrading to modern equivalents.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    45. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      Perhaps you both have good sticky fingers and never drop your phone? I've seen the battery pop out of a Druid X just 2 days ago.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    46. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you didn't do the proper research before buying your phone

      The Tab is a Tablet. :)

      Perhaps you purchased a device with planned obsolescence built in.

      Perhaps I have purchased a phone and never had a complaint about the battery life.

      Oh, speaking of design flaws: The last three phones with replaceable batteries I had both broke at the battery compartment. With two of them, the battery would get knocked out just enough to break the power, and I wouldn't know the brick in my pocket wasn't going to ring when somebody called.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    47. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by wed128 · · Score: 1

      Sooner or later companies will figure out that they can do the same thing with batteries as they did with ink cartridges.

      Do you mean "Incredibly cheap device, Super Expensive battery"? To me, that sounds way better then the status quo "Super Expensive Device, Unavailable Battery".

    48. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Perhaps you both have good sticky fingers and never drop your phone? I've seen the battery pop out of a Druid X just 2 days ago.

      My Droid X has been dropped lots of times. Last June it went down with me on east i84, at speed, motorcycle accident, ripped out of the holster, case scarred up from the impact and skittering across the asphalt, recovered by the EMT who got it back to me after I regained consciousness in ICU. The phone still worked and the battery had not popped out. So no, I don't know what you're talking about. "The battery popping out" sounds like a made-up thing from Apple fanbois.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    49. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      My old iPod was more expensive to repair than a brand new iPod with 4x the storage capacity. I wasn't offended and just bought a new one instead. In fact, I was quite stoked.

      (nod) That is by design. It's part of the Apple business model, even the "stoked" part.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    50. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Buggy whips are perfectly repairable, as are steam engines. The problem? Running them is infinitely more expensive than upgrading to modern equivalents.

      False premise. That the 4s has been released doesn't make the 4 a buggy whip. It's still a phone, and it still makes calls. (Unless you hold it wrong.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    51. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Basically, it comes down to what you are willing to give up for a replaceable battery. Battery life? Batteries that are wrapped around every bit of free space inside the case are not easily replaceable. Weight? Battery doors and batteries that are neatly encased in boxes add more weight. Size? A bigger case is needed to accommodate a replaceable battery.

      So you can lug around your thick, heavy laptop with its replaceable battery (and a spare battery so you won't run out of power on air flights). Or you can have a light, thin laptop with long battery life, and pay a few bucks extra when the battery finally wears out (assuming you haven't upgraded by then; I have a first generation MacBook Air and the battery still works fine).

    52. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by shilly · · Score: 1

      you should try having to use a blackberry (thanks, work). Fucking battery falls out all the fucking time. very fucking irritating.

    53. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      It's not just iPods. My father-in-law had a very reliable electric pencil sharpener from the 80s. The one gear that was plastic finally crapped out this year (while I was using it, of course). We found a replacement part on eBay for $10 plus shipping. But you can go to Office Depot and get one for $13, so what's the point? It was sad to have to chuck such a sturdy piece of kit.

    54. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      you should try having to use a blackberry (thanks, work). Fucking battery falls out all the fucking time. very fucking irritating.

      I had an original Bold as a work phone, and the back would fall off all the time. (Bad clasp design.) I don't recall the battery falling out, though. The clasp was redesigned in the Tour and the new Bold, and the problem did not resurface.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    55. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      A 4 will still be under warranty if you wanted it. Why you wouldn't put a $700 device you walk around with a lot and likely will drop at least once under AppleCare would surprise me. They even cover glass breakage, which is worth the price of the warranty itself. That said, mine's not. :)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    56. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I used the example of the 4 specifically because I know of two 4 owners who stood in the rain to get a 4s. I will never understand that. But more to the point: Buggy whips are only useful if you're into a little light S/M or actually still riding a buggy. (I shoot horse shows, and people really still ride horse buggies for sport, and consider buggy whips definitely worth repairing, but never mind.) Steam engines are only useful if you have some reason to own a steam engine. For instance, if you had water and firewood but no access to petrol, repairing a steam engine might be considered a good idea.

      But an original ipod touch still runs ipod touch apps and still plays music, and if it meets one's needs, it is still useful. I have one in the lab right now with a broken screen and bad headphone jack, and I have the parts to fix it when I get the time. (I first have to replace the battery in a friend's mini.)

      I have an ancient 3rd generation ipod in my truck (my only personal Apple device in use at this time). It connects directly to the radio (a feature of the radio) which allows me to control the ipod, so it only has to come out of the glove box when I add music to it. Works fine, no reason to change. I may replace the battery some day. Simply because a newer model exists, doesn't make the device I own any less useful. (One caveat; it is Firewire, so won't work with any of Apple's newer laptops, but that's ok because putting Firewire on a Windows box is trivial.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    57. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      [older ipod].... (One caveat; it is Firewire, so won't work with any of Apple's newer laptops, but that's ok because putting Firewire on a Windows box is trivial.)

      Interesting, last I checked, laptops still came with firewire check the connections - Firewire 800, which will connect to a FW400 with the proper inexpensive and commonly available cable. For your scenario, battery replacement seem unnecessary.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    58. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by janimal · · Score: 1

      Yea.. N900 battery not fall out. USB port fall out. Shitty quality. Not buying Nokia any more.

    59. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by countach · · Score: 1

      Every macbook I've ever owned has had battery problems. Admittedly they are usually after I passed them down to my teenage kids, but try making a teenage girl follow the rules of maximum battery health. Can't be done.

      I can live with most of the compromises of the new Macbook Retina, but the glued in battery seems a bit of a deal killer to me. Unless Apple has a trick up its sleeve to get it out in their service centres, it will cost an absolute fortune to replace them. Think like $1000 plus for a new top case and labour to completely disassemble.

    60. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm still using my Creative Zen Vision M from 2005. I've never replaced anything in it, not even the battery. It's been in my car for the last 3 years in direct sunlight and freezing temperatures.

      If it's built well, you shouldn't need to replace things. If you do need to replace things, you should be able to do so fairly easily. I don't know which category Apple really falls into. I don't own anything they sell.

    61. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Factory-installed ram is three times as expensive as what you can get on Newegg now,

      You can't get DDR3L SODIMMs on newegg right this instant, so you're statement is bullshit from the start.

      However, 16GB of DDR3 1600 SODIMMs are $125 on average. Its hard to say $200 is 3 times $125.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    62. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by russotto · · Score: 1

      This is like the auto manufacturer welding your hood shut.

      If they could make a very reliable car which got 200mpg @ 90mph with no regular maintenance needed at the cost of nothing being repairable by the user, I'd think that was great.

      There's a difference between welding the hood shut just to increase profits (e.g.locked bootloaders) and doing it as an engineering tradeoff.

    63. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I also saw someone drop an iPhone 4. The thing stopped short of shattering but it's completely broken.

      But hey at least the battery didn't fall out when it was horrendously abused by the ham fisted right?

      There mere fact that this is a topic of contention just shows how stupid we all are.

    64. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Microlith · · Score: 1

      And my USB port has been solid as a rock.

    65. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by bobbutts · · Score: 1

      This is how I do it on my Samsung Galaxy Nexus. I have a universal charger that handles phone and camera batteries.

      I specifically refused iphone and some motorola model of android phone last time around due to non-replaceable battery. I have a little mobile power station too, but it's way less convenient vs. just having an extra battery.

      Also the battery does pop out pretty much every single time I drop it and same on my wife's Samsung Fascinate, it may be a Samsung thing. I had no problem with my Moto Droid 2's battery.

    66. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by toddestan · · Score: 2

      Well, if you pay the $10 to replace the gear in the old one, you can probably count on another couple of decades of reliable service out of it. My guess is that the cheap $13 one that is almost certainly all plastic would be lucky to last more than 2-3 years.

    67. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Who cares about the batteries anyhow. I had to replace the battery on my PJBox after about 6 years, but by then I had almost stopped using it.
      The hard drive on my original mac mini is finally going bad after being on 24/7 for roughly 7 years.... big deal. The iPod I sold never needed a battery change and seemed to hold its charge decently.
      Upgradability is over-rated for almost everyone in the modern context.

      I have built more than 60 linux boxes over the last 15 years, but generally once I build one ... the hardware remains pretty much the same until I get rid of it.
      I guess I don't really understand the need to be constantly upgrading hardware and tinkering. Once a system is built... I cut it loose and build something a bit better the next time around. Constant upgrading of any system is just a nuisance really... except for the hobbiest I suppose. But these days products really aren't made with them in mind. Products these days are made for the consumer who doesn't want to think about upgrades other than buying a better gadget as technology advances.

      Other than upgrading the ram in my hackintosh and one of my mini's I haven't really found that I need to do anything to my macs.
      Use a mac for 6 or 8 years until it is getting long in the tooth and get a new one and sell the old one.

    68. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Yep.... the battery thing is mostly over-rated and will become even more so in the next 10 years. Eventually the battery will last more than long enough for the device to become obsolete as a technology so the point of a hinged battery door will be an odd concept.

    69. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by justforgetme · · Score: 1

      Yep.

      Still this makes apple the prime evangelist of the throwaway culture all electronics companies want to introduce, or debatably already have introduced. No arguing most of apple's products feature the least compromise amongst their fields but the ideology the company headlines makes me seriously skeptical.

      --
      -- no sig today
    70. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Dropped my Nexus S (owned 1.5 years now) ~4ft on to concrete sidewalk, the rear cover/battery cover came loose on one end. My Blackberry Curve 83xx had an easily removable battery cover, but I can't ever recall it coming off unless I was bored (Blackberries allow for completely tool-less disassembly, good way to kill time in the airport or whatever)

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    71. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      When i bought my last laptop, it came with 4gb and buying 8gb cost at least $400 anywhere you looked... A year down the line 8gb was under $100 and i bought it, soldered ram would have made this impossible and i would either have had to stick to 4gb, or pay a huge premium to get 8gb up front.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    72. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by shilly · · Score: 1

      Happens to me regularly. I wish it didn't.

    73. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      The battery bay must be out of tolerance. I will grant you that the original Bold, although it had some nice features (a big screen for a Blackberry, and one of the nicest keyboards they ever produced) had some inexcusably bad design decisions and build issues. After returning my second Bold to IT, I requested a Tour, which was not quite as nice feature-wise but a much better structural design. The problem at the time was that the Bold was AT&T and the Tour was Verizon only. I don't know what the situation is now, as I've moved on to Android. [1]

      [1] The story there is that the company outsourced all IT functions on a Friday, and on Saturday at 10:31 AM the BES server went down hard and remained down for a week and a half. By the time the offshore admins had it up again, my fellow employees had switched en-masse to other platforms. Sucks to be Blackberry.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    74. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by awyeah · · Score: 2

      If you disagree, there are lots of plastic monsters to choose from other manufacturers.

      There are also still (for the time being, at least) other models in the Macbook Pro line to choose from.

      --
      Why, no, I haven't meta-moderated lately. Thanks for asking!
    75. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      There was a time I'd take exception to your statements, now I agree fully. My hackintosh has had some drive upgrades, well, additions mostly, and a RAM upgrade. However, to build this one I removed almost all the hardware from the case and essentially built a new one with a few parts reused from the old one (1 HD and the HDDVD/BD/DVD burner) The reason why was I didn't need another box and I received a really nice CPU (980x) as a gift. The old parts are still sitting on a shelf - I should probably sell them off.

      My mini's been running 2 years straight, I only upgraded the RAM. For drive space I added an external green drive, works fine for what it's used for. My windows box won't boot Windows XP in anything but safe mode, so it's been sitting unplugged in a closet for 2 years now. My Linux box has been running for 5 years non-stop only rebooting during 3 power outages that exceeded the battery life of the UPS. It's time to retire it however because the mini can do the last remaining job with a second external HD, and the mini's being used for more tasks. My wife will be happy that various boxes and components are leaving the house. I've already gotten rid of over 10 boxes and a bunch of old accessories that were mainly collecting dust at this point. (What do you do with 2 Sun Ultra 2s today? They're power hogs and the mini handles more than both of them could together)

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    76. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Grudge2012 · · Score: 1

      I really enjoyed my 3rd-gen iPod. That 10 GB sucker kept me in good listening mode for about five years. Eventually, the hard drive crapped out. I still have it, though it is difficult to see how much use it would be unless I replaced the hard drive and battery - assuming I could even find replacement parts.

      http://pdasmart.com/ipodpartscenter3g.htm - just a little Googleing.

    77. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Right, because the strategy of newer products being better/faster/better value is SO TOTALLY unique to apple, as is the situation that stuff is expensive to fix. The replaceable-parts thing has been beat to death. Have those decrying Apple for this been living under a rock? If you want a bulky item that's held together with 2" deck screws, then by all means you should hunt up one of the old bag phones. Otherwise, get a clue and STFU.

    78. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Also, the GP's "stoked" part is because he/she felt that a purchase of a shiny new model was now justified that the old one is broken. Lots of people enjoy new/improved/shiny updates to stuff, but some of us feel that throwing away something older that still works is inappropriate. I have a new MBP on order because my 2007 MBP has been unreliable ever since being dropped -- a drop that would have completely splintered the plastic Dells that my company used to stick people with. I also have an 867MHz TiBook that sits in the kitchen for my wife to use for email. Sucker's old and slow, but it still works, despite having years ago fallen top-down onto an unexpected 2" bolt sticking out of a floor.

    79. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Thank you. I'm a he btw. To the point, I was "stoked" because either way, I'm going to spend the money. Why not get one that is new (thus less prone to breaking again for a while), has better performance, and doesn't cost any more money? Hell, my 2008 Mazdaspeed3 just blew up and the price to fix it ($3800) wasn't worth it, so instead of sinking ~$4k into something with 100k miles that might break again tomorrow, I put $6500 down on a new car (the value of my car after the cost of the repair, ...it was paid off). Sure I have a car payment for 24 months, but I also have a shiny new car that, even if it blows up in the next 3 years, won't cost me a dime to repair.

      So no, it's not an Apple fanboy thing, it's a convenience/value thing.

    80. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Maybe you've just got a really fancy motorcycle or great body protection gear, because I had a motorcycle accident recently with my DroidX where I splashed in a puddle and the battery ejected out with such force that it tore a hole in my denim jeans, before smashing the windscreen of the car behind me.

      My Apple battery is in so firmly I have to pay over $100 just to remove it! It's fantastic!

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    81. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by hackula · · Score: 1

      Until I caved and got an iphone 6 months ago, every phone I ever had prior would have its battery fall out at least once a week. OTH, I doubt my iphone would survive a single one of the falls that lead to those battery-pop-outs. I tend to be a lot more careful with my iphone. Just my 2 cents.

    82. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by hackula · · Score: 1

      You're right. Most people just throw away their TV remote, flash light, automobile, etc. when the batteries die. /sarcasm

    83. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by hackula · · Score: 1

      You hand in your MBP (along with $1500 + tax) and they hand you a new one.

    84. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "But people who are not geeks should have a better option than just throwing away a perfectly good device just because the culture says that this is acceptable."

      They do. They can give it to me or other geeks.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    85. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      That's funny, but this really happened. I have to wear a med alert bracelet now and I have a scar that would frighten children. The case of the droidx is scarred and the screen was not entirely protected by the screen protector, but the phone (somewhat surprisingly) still works. Which is disappointing in a way, as work is now issuing the X2.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    86. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > I think if they could make the battery user-replaceable, and exactly as large as it is now, without affecting the size of the device then they would do so.

      Um, no, they really wouldn't. The whole purpose (speaking as one who has spent years in marketing for a large company) is to promote a disposable mindset. It's genius, really -- how the next incremental increase is timed to be comfortably within the lifespan of consumable, but non-replaceable parts in the previous model, and how Apple consumers help the company promote this mindset by rationalizing design decisions.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    87. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by Wovel · · Score: 1

      Of course the think pad battery lasts half as long and only costs slightly less to replace on your own.

    88. Re:has no user-replaceable parts at all by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Mac fanboi hyperbole. Thanks for playing.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  2. Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Without a doubt, this new laptop is an engineering marvel..."

    Oh give me a fucking break. The LEM was an engineering marvel. The Roman aqueducts were an engineering marvel. Apple has done nothing of the sort, what bologna.

    1. Re:Christ... by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, they did. It's called a "Mac Plus" -- the greatest Apple Macintosh ever built.

    2. Re:Christ... by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Without a doubt, this new laptop is an engineering marvel..."

      Oh give me a fucking break. The LEM was an engineering marvel. The Roman aqueducts were an engineering marvel. Apple has done nothing of the sort, what bologna.

      They engineered the battery to be right at the very edge of the unit, in a perfect spot to be easily replaced should they decide to put a thin layer of plastic around it and install a tiny seam on the outside (as many past owners found to be perfectly acceptable) but instead they decided that selling $150 replacement batteries wasn't enough, now they need to sell $150 replacement batteries AND $150 replacement battery services. That's a marvel.

    3. Re:Christ... by Samalie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I like Apple.

      "Engineering Marvel" is a fucking joke. I agree with the parent 100%.

      Its just a fucking laptop.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which actually really serves to highlight the contrast between Apple Computers, the technology company, and Apple, Inc., the appliance and marketing company.

      The only thing they've done lately is make new, chrome-y buttons whose highlights respond in time with the gyroscope in iOS 6. Wow, what progress.

    5. Re:Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      ...they decided that selling $150 replacement batteries wasn't enough, now they need to sell $150 replacement batteries AND $150 replacement battery services...

      Hmm ... seems to me that it costs $129 for a new battery and that includes installation. Apple MacBook Battery Replacement

    6. Re:Christ... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Its just a fucking laptop.

      Well, in some circumstances, that would be considered a big plus, even if it doesn't quite rise (ahem) to the level of an engineering marvel.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Christ... by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Are they replacing your battery? Or giving you a refurb laptop? The last 5 people I know that had the battery replaced also needed to restore their data. Never knew that changing a battery required data to be restored in a laptop.

      I know the apple store people also re-imaged the laptop. No need to, but that is part of their procedure. That was on 3 of them. The other 2 actually got a different laptops back.

    8. Re:Christ... by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Informative

      >>>Mac plus -- the greatest Apple Macintosh ever built.

      Really? A 68000 @ 8 MHz computer that cost $2600 in 1986. The best? No wonder I never bought one (though I used them in school). The Commodore Amiga cost about 1/3rd that price, at approximately the same speed, but with full 4000-color display and TV compatible resolution, so it could show full-sized video. In fact it was used to produce special effects for several sci-fi shows. Plus it had preemptive tasking.

      The Mac+ was a boring black-and-white with teeny-tiny screen, that could only run one task at a time, and frequently crashed when I was using it.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    9. Re:Christ... by SJ · · Score: 1

      So why hasn't anyone else built something better already?

    10. Re:Christ... by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ah, the old "non-user replaceable battery" complaint. Didn't fly with the iPod 10 years ago. Still doesn't fly now.

    11. Re:Christ... by atisss · · Score: 2

      Probably because hardware serial number changed. Replacing battery would change serial and OS license numbers.

    12. Re:Christ... by atisss · · Score: 2

      It's a marketing marvel.

      Delaying parts manufacturers for some "a bit better tech" and then stuffing/selling their own product with that.

    13. Re:Christ... by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      I think it's an engineering marvel. Don't overlook the value of being able to build very small things in a very-confined space, versus making gargantuan devices. (Read Asimov's Foundation vs. Empire as example.) The Romans were great at making huge-ass projects like aquaducts and stadiums, but overlooked the value of the steam engine because it was tiny and considered unimportant. We could have had the industrial revolution in 100 A.D. instead of 1700 A.D.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    14. Re:Christ... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes it did, and it still does. It's a perfectly valid complaint.
      Something to be weighed when considering the whole.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    15. Re:Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Replacing battery would change serial and OS license numbers.

      Why? I'm not saying you're necessarily wrong, but why on earth would it? That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard. It's just a damned battery.

    16. Re:Christ... by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      and I see it as a Major PLUS!

      It means in 3 years a Macbook Pro will be sold on the used market for a LOT less than current models with a replaceable battery. Those of us that actually have a brain will be able to trade an hour or so of time for a $300-$400 lower price on a used mac laptop.

      Hell I now have two iPad 2's that I paid nothing for except for the price of a new digitizer front and 1 hour each to replace it. They were GIVEN to me, one is a 64gig 3G unit.

      I want apple to make everything hard for the general moron to fix. Because it turns into a boon for those of us that have ability and IQ.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:Christ... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      Probably because hardware serial number changed. Replacing battery would change serial and OS license numbers.

      probably not. they just get a quicker turn around when they give another laptop.

      and it's not like apple would need to care about the os license, all they care is that it's run only on their hw.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    18. Re:Christ... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      It means in 3 years a Macbook Pro will be sold on the used market for a LOT less than current models with a replaceable battery.

      Which current models with a replaceable battery did you have in mind, exactly?

    19. Re:Christ... by rwven · · Score: 1

      You can buy plenty of laptops that are technically "better" than this macbook pro. Maybe they don't have a shiny aluminum case, but all that matters for is show-off value anyway.

    20. Re:Christ... by gl4ss · · Score: 3, Informative

      So why hasn't anyone else built something better already?

      because the parts lines(in factories) came online just this spring? and apple doing what it does usually, buying the entire supply(the screen) for the line.

      I guess it depends a bit also on what you consider better too. on a machine like that, I wouldn't mind some extra thickness for better ventilation. asymmetrical fans or not it's going to scream with load.

      but the ive video regarding them "designing everything" just oozed with bullshit, especially when none of the chips come from apple, the display isn't manufactured by apple and cramming the motherboard into that space really isn't an engineering marvel in 2012...

      the real marvel is that they didn't pair it up with intel shitgraphics really. and another thumbs up marvel is that the included an actual hdmi port! maybe steve is really dead.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    21. Re:Christ... by _xeno_ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh, yes it does. My old MacBook had the battery die after two years. I had to replace it ($150 mail order from Apple) and the laptop still works fine otherwise, despite being nearly four years old by now. (Oh, and I upgraded the hard drive. Something else you can't do any more.)

      Having a non-replaceable battery, especially given that it's Apple, is absolutely a deal-killer.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    22. Re:Christ... by Cramer · · Score: 1, Informative

      To be fair, (w.r.t. Babylon 5) the AMIGA didn't make the show... the Video Toaster CARD in the Amiga did 99% of the work. (and the video toaster was *not* cheap) The Amiga hardware wasn't fast enough to do video production -- neither was the Mac Plus, for that matter. (most 486's of the era couldn't either.)

    23. Re:Christ... by 6ULDV8 · · Score: 1

      By my measure, syncing the clock on the stove, microwave, DVD, TV, alarm and car stereos would be an engineering marvel. It all depends on perspective. Yes, there have been greater accomplishments. That doesn't mean your newest widget isn't nifty.

      --
      Pull my finger for my public key.
    24. Re:Christ... by mortonda · · Score: 1, Informative

      I love my first gen MBP, it has served me well. But it has gone through 3 batteries, and I need to order another one now. (They bulge out and die)

      The nearest Apple store is an hour and a half away. If I can't order an inexpensive battery and replace it myself, then.... I'm not going to buy the laptop. So long Apple. Great product, until you you started screwing us.

    25. Re:Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Can you please toss the LHC into the list of engineering marvels? :)

    26. Re:Christ... by Dynedain · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yay, anecdotal evidence time!

      I have managed over 20 Macbooks over the last 7 years and have had to replace only 3 batteries, all of which were covered as warranty replacements and so wouldn't have mattered if they were user-replaceable or not.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    27. Re:Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      According to eBay, my 2-year-old MacBook Pro has retained between 60% and 75% of its value. Count me as ecstatic.

    28. Re:Christ... by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How long did you use them? Because the battery will die, eventually. Apple claims you've got, at best, three to four years before the battery is basically useless. If you only kept the 20 MacBooks running for like two years each, then congrats, you got managed to get lucky and dodging the "battery starts to bulge" problem that's been plaguing Apple.

      And if the selling point to a MacBook is that it'll last longer than a cheaper Windows laptop, the battery being unreplaceable is definitely an issue. (If the selling point is instead "shiny high-DPI display," on the other hand...)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    29. Re:Christ... by Cramer · · Score: 2

      Well, go give the Romans billet aluminium and CNC machines and see where they go with it. The Romans had plenty of slave labor; they didn't need steam engines.

    30. Re:Christ... by Selfbain · · Score: 5, Funny

      You ever played a video game on a Roman aqueduct? The frame rate is atrocious.

      --
      Well, it has never been successfully tested.
    31. Re:Christ... by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      All of those 20 machines (well, some of them are only a year old) have lived a full lifespan of active use for at least 4-5 years.

      One of the battery replacements was for the battery bulge after almost 3 years of use. I'm still using that particular machine as my primary computer and it hits the 5 year mark this month. I will be replacing it with the new MacBook Pro because it's difficult to run Eclipse, Chrome, and any 3rd application simultaneously on this aging machine. Although the swap-space improvements in OSX Mountain Lion might breath some new life into it, and it looks like this is the cuttoff as the oldest Apple laptop that will run 10.8.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    32. Re:Christ... by tlhIngan · · Score: 5, Informative

      So why hasn't anyone else built something better already?

      because the parts lines(in factories) came online just this spring? and apple doing what it does usually, buying the entire supply(the screen) for the line.

      Well, Apple made some rather significant investements in their supply chain - they've paid Sharp and others billions to improve LCD screens, paid millions to the factories in Japan that produced raw materials for the batteries affected by the earthquake, etc.

      So it's not just buying up entire supplies (when you think about it, if a Mac sells a million units, that's a million screens - a rather considerable amount of product to produce. Not counting ones that fail Apple QC and end up on the secondary market as cheap monitors).

      There are other companies able to do so as well - Samsung invested heavily in OLED display technology, hence why practically all their phones have it. Heck, perhaps Apple was willing to pay for significant investments in OLED screen technology so they can use it in the next iPhone, but Samsung rejected it. After all, Apple doesn't throw you a billion dollars without expecting something in return.

    33. Re:Christ... by LordLimecat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whats a marvel is that people try to defend a $2800 laptop with no user-replaceable parts, and that finally, as predicted for ages, even the RAM is nonupgradeable.

      But nah, theyre not trying to stick it to the customer by forcing you to pay $200 for that extra 8GB of ram (market value $80), no sir.

    34. Re:Christ... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Non-user upgradeable RAM and HDD seems like a far more important complaint to me, especially given how badly they gouge on the prices for those parts.

    35. Re:Christ... by Voyager529 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You ever played a video game on a Roman aqueduct? The frame rate is atrocious.

      It plays "Pipe Dream" pretty well.

    36. Re:Christ... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just to makea point: The 'base' ram is 8GB. Taking it up to 16GB costs £160. On EBuyer, 8GB 1600MHz DDR3 in laptop form (Corsair, not unbranded) are £45 each - so that means apple is charging people a little over three and a half times as much. If you do the math for the SSDs you'll find similar. So, while the Apple engineering is impressive, there can really be no doubt that they utterly screw their customers over on price. The only other sector I can think of that gets away with that sort of thing is brand-name clothing, and for exactly the same reason.

    37. Re:Christ... by Macman408 · · Score: 5, Informative

      For the Retina MacBook Pro, it's actually $199; $129 is for the MacBook, or the normal 13/15-inch MacBook Pro. (The 17" MacBook Pro battery replacement is $179.)

      That said, the price isn't far off other manufacturers' discrete battery prices; Dell's prices for similarly-sized batteries range from $146 for their cheapest 90 Wh 9-cell battery (for certain Inspiron models), to $300 for a 97 Wh 9-cell extended battery that covers the whole bottom of a Latitude, with most 90 Wh batteries at about the $170 price point. Compared to that Latitude one, $199 isn't such a bad deal for a 95 Wh battery...

    38. Re:Christ... by C_amiga_fan · · Score: 5, Informative

      No. The Video Toaster was a genlock with built-in special effects (wipe, fade, etc). We used to have one in our college TV station. That's all it did. BUT the Amiga's 68000 CPU did the number-crunching to generate the CGI, and the Amiga coprocessors displayed the 704x480 image that was captured to videotape (one frame at a time) for Babylon 5, seaQuest, Above & Beyond.

      If for some reason you STILL don't think Amiga can do CGI, just go watch the Star Wars Walker Demo. Or any other video/demo from that era. Or you could rewatch B5's axis transport/elevator and notice how pixelated everything looks..... a side effect of the Amiga's low resolution.

      >>>The Amiga hardware wasn't fast enough to do video production (most 486's of the era couldn't either.)

      It doesn't have to be "fast". They are only generating ONE frame every hour or so. According to one of the animators Mojo, it could take an entire week just to generate a few seconds of CGI.

      .

      --
      FREE magazine : http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/prior/
    39. Re:Christ... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      In my current laptop, my original battery started to bulge after two years. I walked into an Apple store, patiently waiting 30 minutes to see someone at the genius bar, and received my complimentary replacement battery. The replacement still works fine a year+ later.

      TFA is down/offline but if Apple can replace it for cost, they can certainly replace it for free when it has a defect.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    40. Re:Christ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Apart from the cost of replacement there are two other reasons why a non-removable battery are a bad idea.

      1. Heat ages batteries, so if you use your laptop on your desk a lot the best thing to do is remove the battery. By only putting the battery in my Panasonic Let's Note when I actually need it I have kept it in excellent condition for four years and counting. Friends and colleagues who keep theirs in all the time but hardly ever use the machine off the mains have theirs die in a couple of years.

      2. You are supposed to responsibly dispose of batteries. That can be rather difficult if they are non replaceable. I have a Philips electric toothbrush that is designed to commit suicide when you remove the battery, but at least it can be removed for disposal.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re:Christ... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't hold your breath, there will be people on eBay willing to fit compatible batteries for $50 so that is the maximum discount you are likely to see.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    42. Re:Christ... by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I love my first gen MBP, it has served me well. But it has gone through 3 batteries, and I need to order another one now. (They bulge out and die)

      There is a difference between 1st gen and current MacBooks. The user replaceable batteries only lasted for 300 charges, while the new non-replaceable ones should last 1000 charges. With larger capacity to start, so you will use fewer charges.

    43. Re:Christ... by QuantumRiff · · Score: 4, Funny

      Okay guys. Lets freeze, and back slowly away, off his lawn.....

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    44. Re:Christ... by C_amiga_fan · · Score: 1

      I've heard that before but it doesn't add up. The British also had plenty of slave labor (and tons of unemployed white labor), but that cheap labor didn't stop them from developing the engine & creating the industrial revolution. If Romans ignored the steam engine there must have been some other reason.

      --
      FREE magazine : http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/prior/
    45. Re:Christ... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I've had Macs since a 128K in 1985, and seen a lot of them. I even had a 4400, the worst Mac ever built, some of the 81xx series where you have to remove the motherboard to add RAM, and some of the pokey 61xx series, with that wonderful special (as in education) video adapter cable that usually developed at least one broken wire from flexing. The second best Mac I ever had was a IIci, and the third was a Power Tower Pro.

      But I'd have to say the G4 MDD (the dual-CPU USB 1.1 version) is probably the best Mac ever. Easy open flip down side door, four hard drive bays, two optical drive bays, four 64-bit PCI slots, runs 9.2 to (I think) 10.5. I've had one for at least eight years now, using it as a mostly-unattended file server and to run a Bit Torrent client on a non-NAT IP address. I've got a Firewire card in there so that external hard drives can have their own channel, and a SATA card. The FSB speed sucks because Motorola didn't care, but its DMA I/O kicks ass. And it was good enough that Apple kept selling the 1GHz model for another couple of years for people who were stuck on 9.2.

      Mine had been randomly freezing the past few months, then a couple of weeks ago it finally refused to run for more than a minute or two before hitting an obvious thermal shutdown. Turns out that the heat sink is held in place by 4 phillips screws, easily accessible with the computer still on the floor. I cleaned away the clay-like crap that pretended to be thermal compound, spread on new white thermal compound, closed it up, and it worked. I was surprised how easy that was.

      I even have a spare power supply because of the furor over the original power supply being noisy. When Apple finally shipped the replacements out, they decided it wasn't worth the cost to have everyone ship the old one back. And now these things under $200 used.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    46. Re:Christ... by s73v3r · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a fuckload more to making a battery "user replacable" than just wrapping the cells in plastic.

    47. Re:Christ... by noh8rz3 · · Score: 1

      2. You are supposed to responsibly dispose of batteries. That can be rather difficult if they are non replaceable.

      you can take any apple product into an apple store and they will dispose of it properly for you. they probably have a mail-in service as well. best buy has a similar program. you can sell old hardware in an amazon buy-back program and get a couple bucks. you can flip it on craigslist. So don't pretend that you need to throw the whole thing in the trash.

    48. Re:Christ... by s73v3r · · Score: 2, Informative

      What's a marvel is that you seem to think that the same things are important to everyone. Most of us don't care about "user replaceable". The other benefits of the machine outweigh any potential inconvenience.

    49. Re:Christ... by noh8rz3 · · Score: 1

      ok. direct me to the laptop that is that thin for 15" and 220ppi screen. I really want to buy something that it technically "better". oh yeah ideally it should cost less than the mbp as well. i await your answer.

    50. Re:Christ... by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Where's the laptop with the retina display? That is also as thick and light as this one?

    51. Re:Christ... by PIBM · · Score: 1

      I`ve heard that the roman aqueducs can support an almost infinite refresh rate; the problem lies with your shitty laptop that can't run the game at a high enough fps for you, but even if it did, you would still be limited by your projector.

      Anyway.. =)

    52. Re:Christ... by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      because the parts lines(in factories) came online just this spring?

      So the line about being able to find laptops that are better than this in every way was a complete lie?

    53. Re:Christ... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      And if you trust sending your MBP to a random person on ebay.... more power to you.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    54. Re:Christ... by tonywong · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It may not be rocket science, but Apple is quite aggressive in using commercial miniaturization and materials that the computer and consumer electronic space isn't used to pushing. That is innovation in itself, especially when you consider the volume of production they can achieve with it.

      Otherwise many other companies would be doing what they're doing right now, but it looks like Apple is consistently the one at the forefront of consumer electronic hardware right now.

    55. Re:Christ... by localman57 · · Score: 1

      How about a car analogy? In a modern car, cruise control is nothing more than a couple of switches that tie back to the engine control computer. In the old days, it was a full blown separate feedback control system. But when it's an option, it's still a couple of hundred dollars. Because people will pay it, and options are where the margins are, especially for dealers. If the extra ram isn't worth 160 pounds to you, don't buy it.

      Apple has a premium product, and they can charge a premium price, because people are willing to pay for the experience it brings. The people buying it don't feel like it's a screw job, or they wouldn't buy it.

    56. Re:Christ... by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      Yay, anecdotal evidence time!

      Well, I have a 2007 Macbook Pro, and I have upgraded my ram to max, changed the HD twice, and replaced the battery three times. For me, the gluing of the battery and the proprietary HD are deal breakers. I mean it. Proprietary HD's are the kind of money grubbing thing that Hewlett Packard at its worst has done. This settles it. The bean counters are now fully in charge at Apple. I have been a strong Apple supporter over the years, but I am becoming increasingly displeased with the company. I've already gone for Android for my phone, and I will look into the viability of getting a Linux laptop as my next machine.

      Apple had better be careful about pissing off tech savvy people. We are the market leaders. We set the trends.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    57. Re:Christ... by CMYKjunkie · · Score: 1

      I still play my 5th gen iPod, bought Xmas 2005, for 2 hours per day (minimum) 5 days per week. Still the original battery, still holds a charge for 6 hours of playback. This alone convinced me that user-replaceable was not a must.

    58. Re:Christ... by rolfwind · · Score: 2

      Because it turns into a boon for those of us that have ability and IQ.

      You mean those people who have the ability to read ifixit.

    59. Re:Christ... by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      I don't understand this whole 'non replaceable battery' complaint. How is it that hard to pop the back cover off to replace the battery? When I got my (now previous generation) MacBook Pro, the first thing I did when I received it was open the back and replace the hard drive. There was even a little booklet in the box with it telling you how to do that. The battery was right there next to it, and I could have easily replaced that too.

    60. Re:Christ... by uglyduckling · · Score: 1, Informative

      The HDD is upgradeable.

    61. Re:Christ... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Actually, that $150-$200 price for extended batteries is usually the manufacturer-recommended pricing. Retailers usually offer them for half that or less...

    62. Re:Christ... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I couldn't compare, because the low-power L variant isn't readily available yet. I'm guessing though that it costs rather less than 350%.

    63. Re:Christ... by ratbag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you taken a look at the form factor of the MBPR and taken the time to consider which off-the-shelf SSD would fit in there?

      Apple couldn't care less about the Slashdot crowd and our tiny but vocal group of whiners. "We" are not market leaders or trend-setters - that ship sailed many years ago, sometime around 1995 I would think, and I think the technology world's a better place as a result.

      Your "deal-breaker" is a feature for many "normal" users. Simple, good-looking stuff that works. And the knowledge that if it fails, the nice people will fix it for them. Normal people don't want to ever get their hands dirty with the insides of a computer, or a car, or with the plumbing of their house. A tiny number of us are interested in that sort of thing - but I scratch that itch with things like a Raspberry Pi (pre-ordered today, yay!) and other trinkets, rather than my main work machines. Others restore classic cars, or do up their houses. But again, the numbers involved are tiny, and it doesn't make Volkswagen produce cars with easily-changeable engines, or persuade builders to externalise all the wiring to make it easy for people to swap it in the future.

      We tech-savvy people shouldn't be "pissed off" at Microsoft, Apple, HP or whoever - we just choose a different product as you're proposing to here (have fun with your Linux laptop, I've been there and done that, but as far as I'm concerned Linux is for my servers and maybe a VM on my Mac for testing).

      But we shouldn't think for one minute that manufacturers are aiming this sort of product (MBPs, desktop PCs, iPods, etc.) at us - we're a tiny fraction of a percent of the buyers. They don't need to be careful. I just happen to think that Apple are making the right decisions at the moment and I'm happy with the price/performance/design balance. I've made use of their warranty and post-warranty facilities and I've been happy with that too.

    64. Re:Christ... by Dynedain · · Score: 3, Insightful

      On the other hand, I don't see many people lamenting anymore that TVs no longer have user-serviceable parts.

      People's expectations for technology changes over time. As it becomes more commonplace, the features change. Apple has made overall device size a driving factor for their product line. This means they compromise upgradeability... even with complaints like yours, that's been a winning decision for them. The other route they could have gone would be to sacrifice features to meet the space.... but then they would have ended up with the same under-powered netbook that was a fad in the market.

      You are not the target audience for this new product. That's fine. The other MacBook Pro models sound like a better fit for your wants. Or, since you're considering Linux, a different brand might be better.

      As for me however, I've gotten really tired of dealing with hardware over the years. Diagnosing, swapping, rebuilding, testing components has gotten tiresome for my own equipment, let alone the support I've been giving friends and family. I'm fine buying a maxed-out machine, forgetting about the hardware, and focusing on simply using it for the kind of work I enjoy.

      Today, most people do not make hardware upgrades to existing machines, as the costs compared to a new machine don't make sense. This is especially true for laptops which have far fewer user-serviceable components. It's much like rebuilding the transmission and steering on a 10 year old car. Sure, you can, but when that costs more than the car is worth, does it make sense?

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    65. Re:Christ... by Dynedain · · Score: 2

      Apple had better be careful about pissing off tech savvy people. We are the market leaders. We set the trends.

      I think the wild success of the iPod, iPhone, iPad, MacBook Air, etc, and how they've redefined their respective markets has proven that the /. demographic are no longer the trendsetters for consumer electronics.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    66. Re:Christ... by FitForTheSun · · Score: 1

      I've gotten two (free) replacement batteries for my 17" MPB (2008 model), so I totally agree with you. If I hadn't noticed the bulge because I could see the battery, then I would have had a chemical explosion right on top of my second favorite part of my body (first favorite is my brain).

    67. Re:Christ... by Sechr+Nibw · · Score: 1

      Vana, I'd like to buy an L...what do you mean, I can only buy vowels?

    68. Re:Christ... by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      I have managed over 20 Macbooks over the last 7 years and have had to replace only 3 batteries, all of which were covered as warranty replacements and so wouldn't have mattered if they were user-replaceable or not.

      It doesn't matter unless you put any value at all on your time. It takes less time for me to replace the battery in my ThinkPad than it does for me to go outside and get in my car, much less the additional half-hour drive to the nearest Apple Store, where I will then have to wait for the service to be completed. As far as battery disposal goes, I throw it in the box with my other old batteries, CFLs, and other similar stuff, and a couple of times a year I make a run to the local landfill where they have electronics/battery recycling services available.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    69. Re:Christ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      how the hell do you expect them to keep their margins and profits so damn high (apple has a higher gross and net revenue than microsoft) if they charged reasonable retail for the parts and upgrades? if they didn't, they'd just be another dell.

    70. Re:Christ... by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Exactly, it isn't available yet. Just like that retina display.

      You can't compare the pricing on unique components with unique features to readily available versions that lack those features.

      And don't compare a 2x4 =8 pricing with the MBPro's onboard... that's essentially a 2x8 = 16.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    71. Re:Christ... by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      The drive is more my concern. In my (last model before the current) 15" MBP I have replaced the stock drive with a 512G seagate hybrid and replaced the optical drive with a 1TB WD drive giving me twice what you can buy the new one with.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    72. Re:Christ... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Rome and Bologna are not the same city.

    73. Re:Christ... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      16GB of RAM for $200 doesn't seem like much of a gauging to me, at least not in the traditional sense of manufacturers overcharging for RAM upgrades at point-of-sales purchases. I'd gladly pay $200 with the general sense of security that I'll never have to buy RAM for that machine again. Unless there's a massive computer paradigm shift, the stock 8GB of RAM is pretty stout, and 16 seems a bit, well, over-the-top.

    74. Re:Christ... by thefixer(tm) · · Score: 1

      Not that this justifies the whole margin, but Apple runs a qualification suite on all products they sell on the stores or put into computers. This includes regular old compatibility testing - as in, the system works with xxx component, as well as a suite of EMI and reliability tests that make sure that these parts, in this particular configuration, pass local regulations. If you go out and buy ram and install it yourself, it doesn't have to pass FCC regs for interference with other devices, if Apple sells you a computer with it installed, it does. Because of this, Apple only sources parts from a few vendors. You would be shocked at the ways these components interact when put in a computer. The more variables (configurations x vendors per part), the more complex it is to complete qualifications. It sounds ridiculous when you only see it from the consumer side. Why is it that Apple charges 3-4 times more for the *same* memory? Well, for each memory configuration they need to test 20 computers for 2 weeks in a reliability lab. Assuming just 3 memory configurations (8, 16 and 32GB) you're talking 60 machines, now add the minimum of a single backup vendor, that's 120 machines. In reality, it's not that straight forward either, you get issues when you mix and match things like different hard drives, pci cards (on desktops), other chip vendors, processor speeds and die revisions.

      All that said, yes, it's a pisser that Apple is finding yet another way to force everything you do to be under their thumb. But we're having this hissy fit because we all know we'll keep buying their products, at the end of the day, what they are doing is creating products we want, which other companies can not compete with.

    75. Re:Christ... by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Informative

      Quick search on newegg.com has 16GB DDR3 RAM at $149, versus $200 from Apple, preconfigured. Your prices suck because you live in the UK, not because of Apple. And yes, I used to live in the UK...don't miss UK prices one bit.

    76. Re:Christ... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > On the other hand, I don't see many people lamenting anymore that TVs no longer have user-serviceable parts.

      Nice conflation there.

      TVs were NEVER upgradeable devices. While they were user serviceable, you never had to worry about a new version of TV-OS making your old TV slow to a crawl until you added some more RAM to it.

      A TV is actually an appliance that won't need to be tinkered with during it's effective life.

      A Mac is not.

      Needing more RAM and more storage during the life of the device is expected.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    77. Re:Christ... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      An engineer would not want one. The poor engineering tradeoffs are rather obvious. The benefits are largely cosmetic and pretty irrelevant.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    78. Re:Christ... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Who are you? Pauly Shore?

      It doesn't have to be metal to be recyclable.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    79. Re:Christ... by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      TVs may never have been upgradeable, but you don't upgrade your laptop battery either. It used to be expected that you would service the TV to replace parts (like vacuum tubes) several times over the lifespan of the product.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    80. Re:Christ... by retchdog · · Score: 1

      no, you must be mistaken. only the special snowflake supergeniuses on slashdot could even begin to understand how to replace commodity hardware components...

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    81. Re:Christ... by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Hate to break it to you... but today's laptops are consumer electronics. Even 99% of desktop computers will go un-upgraded over the course of their lifespan.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    82. Re:Christ... by citylivin · · Score: 1

      "But again, the numbers involved are tiny, and it doesn't make Volkswagen produce cars with easily-changeable engines, or persuade builders to externalise all the wiring to make it easy for people to swap it in the future."

      Just to nitpick, you clearly have never worked on a car. The designers for many cars (north american anyways, cant speak for other types) go out of their way to make things user serviceable (when they can, there are obvious limitations). A technician is no different than a backyard mechanic when it comes down to it. Try changing your serpentine belt, easy as pie once you know the "trick" for your particular car. Brake pads/ rotors and oil are trivially easy as well. So much so that 10$ an hour minimum wage person can do it with almost no training on many different cars.

      After working on cars for a number of years, the one thing I have noticed is there is almost always a "trick" of some sort for getting components unbolted or tested. Be it a channel, hole or access facade where you can fit a tool, or a specific procedure which becomes very easy with a haynes manual or similar. Heck they even ship ODBII since 1996 (ODB1 since the 80s) which allows you to connect computers of varying degrees of complication in order to interface with the computer and do diagnostics. These computers are all available at varying price points, simple ones costing only 30$.

      So i would say that compared to apple, cars are designed to be serviced by users or mechanics, and not just the dealership/manufacturer. They also do not go out of their way to make things difficult as apple seems to be doing (and always have done to some degree). Perhaps that does not apply with newer cars as much, but I doubt it. Nobody likes spending extra unnecessary effort with the only benefit being that the company can charge more. Well no one reputable anyways.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    83. Re:Christ... by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thats fine, and if youre buying the laptop because of the slim formfactor, the lower weight, the aesthetics, or the superior resolution, and its truly worth it to you, go for it.

      Just dont try to feed the rest of us some line about how its a superior machine; I could easily link a $1400 laptop that has superior specs in various areas that ARE important to some people (like upgradeability, video performance, etc).

      Im not against Apple as a market option, im just against the idea that we need to swallow some bull about how PCs are inferior. I have a $450 laptop that does 1366x768, and you know what? The fact that I have a built in ethernet port and can expand the crap out of it is far more important to me than any of that other stuff, and it doesnt mean my machine is inferior.

    84. Re:Christ... by ratbag · · Score: 1

      You're right, I've never worked on a car, although I did help my brother build a Caterham, and I defer to your analysis. The car metaphor fails once again!

      As the owner of a MacPro, I would disagree that Apple always makes things difficult. But again it's a target market issue - MacPro is an expandable machine, designed to take cards and drives and aimed at users who need that facility.

      The iMac and Mini, for example were originally aimed at less hard-core users - the fact that businesses have based themselves on racks of Minis was not in Apple's mind when they chose the form factor or decided to make access difficult - they wanted useful machines that would look good in the living room, take as little space as possible, and excite a non-technical audience.

    85. Re:Christ... by CrashNBrn · · Score: 1

      Really? Because a "quick-search" for DDR3 Laptop Ram on TigerDirect indicates 8GB modules (2x4GB) for $39.99, or $80 for 16GB (4x4GB).
      Alternately, 16GB (2x8GB) modules for $119.99.

    86. Re:Christ... by oxdas · · Score: 1

      So it's not just buying up entire supplies (when you think about it, if a Mac sells a million units, that's a million screens - a rather considerable amount of product to produce. Not counting ones that fail Apple QC and end up on the secondary market as cheap monitors).

      Apple is a big player and a million screens may sound like a lot, but they sold only 3.6 million laptops last quarter (compare that to HP which sold 8.9 million). This is out of the nearly 55 million laptops sold globally last quarter (not year, quarter). Which means, companies like Sharp, LG, and Samsung sold more than 50 million of their 55 million screens to someone other than Apple in the first three months of this year. It makes me wonder if you are overestimating Apple's importance to display manufacturers.

    87. Re:Christ... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      I'd be happy with a 4 or 5 years applecare policy. Although, I can envision using the Retina MBP as a 2-3 year box at most, since the tech will have advanced enough by then to make the next iteration attractive. My current laptop is nearing 3 years of age and works fine. My last laptop is almost 6 years old and still works fine - it had the battery replacement nearly 4 years ago due to a short in the cells - under warranty. The previous PowerPC laptop was sold several years ago was 5 years old and still netted almost $500 at that time with a 1 year old battery replaced for free outside of warranty due to the battery bulge problem.

      Contrast that with my Dells whose batteries had half the life new, and lasted less than a year each for $120 a piece.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    88. Re:Christ... by sgbett · · Score: 1

      Any mac user will tell you, the correct way to dispose of a macbook pro, is to sell it on ebay for anything up to 50% of your original purchase price. (depending on how serviceable and/or old it is...)

      TCO gets better and better... ;)

      --
      Invaders must die
    89. Re:Christ... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Yes, my "quick search on newegg.com" was, imagine this, a quick search on new egg.com, which is why I said, "Quick search on newegg.com has 16GB DDR# RAM at $149.

      So your price is effectively $30 cheaper, for RAM with a form factor not made for an ultra-thin notebook with low power requirements. Congrats, but I don't care about $30.

    90. Re:Christ... by schlachter · · Score: 1

      You're only getting 8GB from Apple for $200. There was already 8GB in the machine.
      Amazon has 16GB listed for $95.

      Anyways, the real problem is not the Apple pricing. It's that it's not user upgradable.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    91. Re:Christ... by schlachter · · Score: 1

      Bah, I've built Roman aqueducts in my video games.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    92. Re:Christ... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      I still have my Amiga. It was a cool gaming machine. But let's face it. The OS was kind of half-baked at introduction (although it got better), with nothing approaching the interface design of a Mac. There's a reason why I did all of my serious work on my Mac instead of my Amiga.

    93. Re:Christ... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I had a first generation MBP. The battery lasted only a couple of hours, that dropped off fast with use (just like every other laptop brand of the time). You had to lug an extra batter for a long plane trip, and you ended up spending considerably more than the cost of replacing a "nonreplaceable" battery on those replacement batteries. On the other hand, I have a first generation MBA. Battery life is still great.

    94. Re:Christ... by makomk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Have you taken a look at the form factor of the MBPR and taken the time to consider which off-the-shelf SSD would fit in there?

      There's actually a standard for small SSDs called mSATA that's roughly the same size as the one in the MBPR. Apple didn't use it. They even went to the trouble of using a different, incompatible connector for the SSD to the similarly-sized one used in the Macbook Air.

    95. Re:Christ... by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      I own a BMW "airhead" motorcycle (1993 r100rt). Many things on that bike are designed to be user serviceable. The manual for the bike came with instructions on how to adjust the valves, and the bike also came with a complete compact toolkit. The bike is designed to last for the long term, and many riders report getting 200k plus miles on them, which is a lot for a motorcycle. The new BMW's are a different story, and some jobs that should be "simple" can run you six hour mechanics bill.

      I have a drier in my basement that is 25 years old. I did have the motor replaced three years ago, but other than that it works perfectly. I talk to friends about their current driers, and many of them see modern driers lasting about five years.

      I also own a 2007 Macbook Pro. I intend to get 8 years out of it. I had the screen replaced in the last few weeks of my 3 year Applecare warranty. It has a new 750GB hard drive, and I will update to 1TB if I can. The machine is still decently responsive and the monitor is still bright. And I am quite sure that there is some functionary at Apple whose job description is to in effect foil the plans of users like me.

      Actually, I once went to a presentation by someone who actually did have a job description like I describe above. He worked for another company I won't name, but he actually admitted that one of his main duties was to make sure that his company didn't "overbuild" the products he sold (his words). I suspect you can even take a course on it in an MBA degree...it probably has a title like "Product Lifecycle Management" or similar. It seems likely to me that companies will actually put effort into making sure their products won't last too long. Hell, they will likely spend more money to make a product last less long, if that contributes to their bottom line.

      Meanwhile, our landfills swell, our emissions grow, and our middle class spends an increasing percentage of income on disposable trinkets that are in effect designed to self-destruct or lose usefulness in a predetermined amount of time. What is wrong with this picture?

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    96. Re:Christ... by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      It's a stupid design choice, especially since pretty much every other manufacturer has managed to solve it.

      I've got a MacBook Pro that's a couple of years old, and while it's technically got user servicable parts, absolutely none of them are accessible from outside the case. You have to tear the whole thing down to do something as simple as replacing the hard drive. I have a spare SSD that I'd have installed in the thing a long time ago if it were as simple a task as it is on every other laptop I've ever owned.

      But keep telling yourself: lack of a feature is a feature! All the other fanbois will agree with you.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    97. Re:Christ... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The price I quoted was for an eight-gig stick, not a 2x4.

    98. Re:Christ... by dotgain · · Score: 1
      The supplied disk utility supports wiping disks clean with your choice of one, seven or 35 passes. I'd be entirely confident disposing of my laptop after a single zero pass. Hopefully you would at least be satisfied with seven passes of random data.

      If you're the kind of person that won't be satisfied until the disk is removed and destroyed ... power to you.

    99. Re:Christ... by oreiasecaman · · Score: 1

      Its just a fucking laptop.

      ...or vagina

      --
      This is a UDP joke, I don't care if you get it or not...
    100. Re:Christ... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I don't see many people lamenting anymore that TVs no longer have user-serviceable parts.

      Get off my lawn. I remember as a kid when I looked at doing one of the Heathkit projection TVs, how soon after hobbyists started to feel like they were being attacked by companies making "throw-away" TVs that would fail after 15-20 years!

      My... how expectations have changed.

    101. Re:Christ... by Dahan · · Score: 1

      Apple had better be careful about pissing off tech savvy people. We are the market leaders. We set the trends.

      No wireless. Less space than a nomad. Lame.

      While I'm no trendsetter, I am tech-savvy, and would buy the Retina MacBook, except I want a 13" version. If Apple comes out with a 13" Retina MacBook in August, as is rumored, I'll get one.

    102. Re:Christ... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Except that there are a plethora of techies who will tell you that the "experience" is for the most part in the mind of the purchaser. Apple has convinced a large number of people that any error or virus or anything else on a Windows box is "just windows breaking"; whereas anything that happens on OSX (and believe me, things do happen) must clearly be their own fault for not using it right.

      I will get calls from people asking how to fix broken printing or safari malfunctions or whatever else on the Mac, but who would 5 minutes later explain how much they love having a Mac which never breaks.

      There are cool things about OSX, and if it were cheaper / dual-bootable on non Apple hardware I would probably pick it up. But I would very likely NOT use it as my primary OS because the last time I spent a significant amount of time on it there were way too many things that drove me up a wall, and it wasnt just "not used to it stuff", it was "OSX doesnt and cant work that way and why would you want it to" stuff. That is, Im expected to conform my expectations to OSX because, of course, its better than me.

    103. Re:Christ... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Youre not going to tell me a voltage drop from 1.5v to 1.35v on a laptop with discrete graphics is worth $1000. I doubt you would even notice the difference, TBQH.

      From http://download.micron.com/pdf/technotes/ddr3/TN41_01DDR3%20Power.pdf
      It looks like peak current is around 120mA, which means the reduction from 1.5v to 1.35v nets you a savings, at maximum, of a whopping 18mW. Thats not even considering that that is PEAK draw, and over time its proabbly closer to 10mW.

      This, in a box drawing a total of probably 40W, which means a savings of 0.25%. WOOOOOOO! THAT will extend the battery life a whole bunch!

    104. Re:Christ... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      that ship sailed many years ago, sometime around 1995 I would think, and I think the technology world's a better place as a result.

      No it's not. when the trend setting levels are set to the lowest common denominator, the products sold become predatory, and largely useless for anything but banal tasks. They typically trade rights/control for convenience under the guise of extremely limited empowerment. Up until about 1998 or so, computing really was about personal empowerment, now it's about usurping as much control from the user as possible.

      Basically, you are arguing from popularity, which is a horrible way to judge success. Unfortunately, our culture suffers this confirmation bias nearly everywhere, and it shows. In the case of replaceable batteries, some of us go off grid for extended periods, and having spare batteries is a necessity. Apple users love to claim how apple products last longer than their cheap windows counterparts, but since the battery is usually the first thing to go, that claim is obviously bogus. 4 years is about average for a laptop battery these days, less if you use it in a way that burns through charge cycles.

      We tech-savvy people shouldn't be "pissed off" at Microsoft, Apple, HP or whoever - we just choose a different product

      this works until there are no other choices. It's a reactionary, passive-aggressive attempt to silence criticism. We have a right to tell manufacturers what we think about their products, and being tech heads, we see things most consumers haven't thought about, which makes the products better when they finally hit the market. people like you don't seem to get that because you're too busy astroturfing for your favorite brands (or justifying your impulsive, emotional purchase). In the case of batteries, it's trivial to allow user-servicable replacements, but apple would rather monetize that (take control) under the guise of convenience (we'll do it for you for $130). It's not really convenience at all because the laptop must be shipped out leaving the customer without a machine for weeks.

    105. Re:Christ... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      My apologies; peak curent appears to be 350mA, which ups the reduction to ~30mW, and the percent to 0.75%, at absolute peak (burst write). Now we're cooking with gas.

    106. Re:Christ... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Except that that 149 is for a package of 16GB, not an upgrade from 8 to 16. 8GB price is typically $80; the fact that you can get the full 16 for cheaper than Apple's upgrade is just icing on the cake.

      Consider that they charge $900 for an UPGRADE from a HDD to SSD, whereas if you just bought the laptop and did it yourself you would not only save $500 (assuming a 512GB crucial M4), but you would also get a 500GB HDD to boot. Then consider why you would ever pay for upgrades through the apple store if they didnt force you to.

    107. Re:Christ... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Agreed that it's problematic that it's not user-upgradable (for certain customers), but the machines come with either 8GB or 16GB. They don't add 8GB when you order a 16GB model. And is that Amazon price the same type of custom shaped RAM that fits in an ultrathin portable and uses low energy requirements, like that in the Retina display Macbook Pros? Isn't mass produced similar form-factor ram chips like that on Amazon cheap because there's so much of it available (honestly don't understand RAM as a commodity, so I'm just asking, not saying)? It would follow that custom ram that works in the ultrathin form factor and with the lower power requirements for longer battery life would be more expensive.

      The target customer for this product thinks 8GB is already enough OR they'll go for the insane 16GB amount because $200 isn't a lot of money when spending $2100 (at least). In three or four years, something new and shiny will be out. To this market segment (and I admit, I'm in it), the RAM is not an issue.

    108. Re:Christ... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      ..which is to the detriment of us all, techs and the people who are these 'new' targets.

    109. Re:Christ... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      just because people don't 'feel' like they're being screwed doesn't mean they aren't being screwed. It just means they're making ignorant, emotional, impulsive purchases..

    110. Re:Christ... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen, you aren't "upgrading" 8GB of RAM to 16GB, you are buying a model with 8GB or a model with 16GB. It's not as simple as just adding 8GB more. I understand in user-replacable laptops you can just fill another slot, but there are no "slots". You don't recover the RAM you are upgrading to use in another computer or sell on eBay. Therefore, you have to price the cost of 16GB of RAM, not 8GB. Which, by the way, is an argument FOR user-replaceable RAM, but I don't think that's feasible given the engineering design of the thin form-factor.

      And for your HDD analogy, that's exactly how it works with the non retina Macbooks. If that is your requirement (to save money), then the engineering tradeoff of non-user replaceable hard drive because of ultra ridiculously thin form factor is not for you. But a non-retina Macbook Pro. It's not like Apple charges your for 8GB of RAM, takes it out and keeps it for themselves, then forces you to buy 16GB of RAM. They make two models. Pick one that suits your needs. If neither do, buy something else. Forcing decade-old paradigms on a product that is obviously trying to buck decade-old paradigms doesn't make much sense. If it ain't broke, don't fix it, makes sense to you, there are plenty of non retina display laptops from Apple and other manufacturers to chose from.

      $120 for preinstalled RAM upgrades isn't really a big deal for someone considering this model, especially in a computer that starts at $2100. Imagine if you will a high-end car brand buyer NOT buying a $75,000 car because he didn't want to spend $150 on floor mats he can get at Wal-mart for $15. Pretty stupid, in the grand scheme.

    111. Re:Christ... by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      Dell and everyone else also have to meet these specs.. It doesn't justify 3.5x overcharge for 8GB ram upgrade.

      All that said, yes, it's a pisser that Apple is finding yet another way to force everything you do to be under their thumb. But we're having this hissy fit because we all know we'll keep buying their products, at the end of the day, what they are doing is creating products we want, which other companies can not compete with.

      speak for yourself. the only thing that makes this laptop interesting is the display, and that wasn't developed by apple. apple just said to the panel OEM "we'll buy X number of panels if you'll only sell them to us for Y amount of time". I hardly see any innovation in that.

    112. Re:Christ... by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Where do you get $1000 from? The price difference for 8GB vs 16GB of soldered-on RAM is $200.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    113. Re:Christ... by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      4x4GB is not what Apple is installing. Apple is installing 2x8GB.

      So, for $80 difference in price, it comes pre-tested, pre-installed, and soldered in. Doesn't sound like that bad of a markup to me.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    114. Re:Christ... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The problem is the "USER" in the argument. At the above quoted $129 to get Apple to replace the battery they work out cheaper than getting Dell to send you a replacement battery for an older laptop. Though I suppose with Apple you actually need to take the laptop to them, damn they waste my time like this!!!

      As for the iPods the battery is definitely "user" replaceable. The "user" just takes it to the Chinese corner store (the ones that sell all those mobile phone covers) and asks them to replace the battery. They will often do it right in front of you. Incidentally they will also replace damaged screens for you too. Those "users" who don't know where the Chinese store is just talk to people, people know people, and those people know non-users (reads Geeks). I've happily replaced batteries on iPod nanos, I even have been paid for the 15min it took me to do it.

      Let me make something very clear. I hate Apple. Hate the company, hate the locked down products. But if the "non-user replaceable battery" for some reason weighs heavily on your decision to buy an Apple product, then you should bloody well buy it because you won't find a more perfect product for you elsewhere.

      We argue such trivialities on this board that it absolutely boggles the mind.

    115. Re:Christ... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      That model of Mac came out in early 1984 not 1986. Computers were improving rapidly back then.

    116. Re:Christ... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      As far as profits, Apple is a phone company that also makes other stuff. As far as computers Apple is incredibly dominant, approaching 90% of the over $1000 laptop market.

    117. Re:Christ... by mortonda · · Score: 1

      And don't forget that the initial "7 hour" battery life is also BS if you're doing anything more demanding than staring at a static web page with the screen at minimum brightness.

      And that's probably part of my problem - I am a web application developer and use the heck out of my systems. Server class stuff, development, editors, email, browsers... graphics programs.. virtual machines... That sucks a battery down fast.

    118. Re:Christ... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Apple is about 90% of the laptops over $1000. Apple is around 0% of the laptops under $1000. It depends whether you are talking low end or high end screens.

    119. Re:Christ... by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      The article says that the battery is permanently glued in place on top of the delicate touchpad cable. The hard drive is non-standard, no other drive will fit. Also, the memory is soldered onto the motherboard and special tools are needed to open up the machine in the first place. The computer is intentionally designed to be unfixable, non-upgradable and to become unusable shortly after the warranty runs out. It's sheer greedy dickery on Apple's part - they are setting out to screw their customers with this drastically overpriced and totally unserviceable laptop.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    120. Re:Christ... by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      Only if you get Apple to do it for you with their special part (and extra-special prices).

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    121. Re:Christ... by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

      No, it's 8GB extra for $200, triple the going rate, and no option to buy it from anybody else. And if it ever goes bad you need a new motherboard. And if the camera or the Wi-Fi goes out, that's a whole new, very expensive screen assembly.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
    122. Re:Christ... by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Yep.... me too. Tired of hardware switches.... the countless hours of tinkering to get the drivers to play nicely with my soundcard or video card. It is fun for the hobbiest tinkerer, but not so much for grandma or my dad or the millions of others like them.

      Even I myself just don't have time to muck around like I used to. Now I buy the machine I need... use it for 5-6 years and get the next one. The old one just goes to the back of the line for use by someone else I know or I just donate it to some charity. I just don't want to waste my time or waste my life on doing things which cost me life-force and in the end don't get me a good return.

      I can buy a nice MBP with retina display for a couple of grand.... maybe 800 or so more than what I would pay for some Acer, but it will last me longer in general, allow me to do my photo business better, I won't have to tinker so I won't be wasting my life. Over a 5 year period, it is basically a business expense that will pay for itself. A computer is merely a tool to earn a living. It can be expensed like anything else.... but having a nice machine will really enhance a person's day to day function and bottom line.

    123. Re:Christ... by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      I would love to see if you could find another machine for 1400 with superior specs. I think it would be hard to find one with superior video specs for one. Being able to upgrade the ram or the battery although a convenience is not really a machine spec and at least for me is not really that important since any laptop is merely a tool to run my business more efficiently.

      Lower weight, slim form factor, longer battery life are all specs that I would find crucial for as a photographer. The resolution is just a capper for me.

      The cost of the machine although it might seem like it costs more on its face actually isn't for what you get and how long the macs seem to last. I hear that macs are vastly overpriced all the time, but for the most part I just don't find this to be true. Slightly more expensive at the beginning ... yes, but over time.. not at all.

      As a production tool I think I find this current MBP to be one of the most exciting laptops to come along in a while. It is a game changer for me... especially since I am currently in need of a new one. Couldn't have come at a better time for me personally.

    124. Re:Christ... by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Could you point to this plethora of technically better laptops?

      Bigger, bulkier, with less battery life and lower resolution screen doesn't start these technically better machines off so well at least for what I want to do.

    125. Re:Christ... by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Yep... it seems so.
      So far it seems like the rest of the technological appliance companies are only beginning to catch on. That will be great for everyone, but for now Apple with its constant technological salad tossing seems to have hit on a combo that works better than what other companies in the same field are doing currently and seems like it will continue on this trend for at least the next 5-8 years. Beyond that it is tough to say... new paradigms will change how things are done and Apple may or may not be part of that, but for now, I will continue to buy up Apple stock as I see fit.

    126. Re:Christ... by ratbag · · Score: 1

      A thoughtful riposte, right up to the ad hominem in the last paragraph.

      It's 04:39 in the UK at the moment, so I may not be as cogent as usual. But I'll dive in any way.

      On the specific, tiresome, point of batteries: I have not disposed of any Apple equipment because of an expired battery. Two laptops that I have owned have needed replacement batteries. In one case the batteries were replaced by Apple. In the other case the machine is now used by a friend who's happy to use it tethered on his desk. For my uses it really is a non-issue. I don't worry about it on my iPod - I've got a second and a third gen and both run happily.

      On the issue of control, specifically the assertion that control is being wrested from us poor users. My Macs regularly run Mac OS versions back to Snow Leopard, Solaris 10, several Debian and Red Hat flavours, Windows, both in BootCamp and VM. I don't feel particularly disempowered there.

      My MacPro has several slots in it, into which I could put a new video card. I haven't taken advantage of that opportunity yet, being happy with the video performance. I have put an SSD in. So my chosen desktop hasn't blocked me from upgrading it. If I'd chosen an iMac it wouldn't be so easy, but then I would have made the wrong choice so I would hardly blame a faceless corporation, unless I was stupid.

      For my laptops, I occasionally plug in and external audio processor via USB. Ditto a Korg microUSB keyboard. When I need more storage, I connect either a firewire or USB external drive. For my purposes the internal hard drive of my laptops has always been big enough - the external storage is for archiving or backup. In general, by the time one parameter has been a limiting factor, all of the big three have been limiting - CPU, RAM and disk. I gave up the desire to upgrade a machine's individual components during the time I had my last PC.

      My passive-aggression: during my computing career, starting from 1992, I've used, enjoyed, seen weaknesses in, and moved away from: DOS3.x, 5.x, 6.x, Novell DOS, Windows 3.1, 3.11, 95, 98 (not ME), NT3.51, NT4.0, W2K, XP, (not Vista), Windows 7, OpenBSD, OS/2 Warp, desktop Linuxes from 95-onwards, Solaris (too many versions to recount) and Mac OS, from Tiger onwards, where I currently remain. Choice has not been a problem for me in the OS sphere.

      In computers, through both pre-work and career, I've used and owned everything from Sinclair ZX80, 81, Sinclair Spectrum (all flavours), BBC Model B, BBC Master 128, Acorn Archimedes, Amiga 500, sundry Palms and Psions, Sun pizza boxes and a wide array of servers, Compaq laptops, Dan, Elonex, and HP PCs, Dell, Supermicro and HP servers, all Apple equipment from Mini to XServe. If I wanted to, I could choose from a few thousand PC vendors, each offering subtly different interpretations of the PC theme. At the moment, I choose not to, except for servers at work (typically HP, with a few oddities for FPGA and GPU processes).

      The point of all this: choice really exists. And I really can exercise it. And I continue to exercise it. It may be galling to hear this, but I currently choose Apple products for many of my computing requirements for reasons I've gone into in this thread and others. But I also use a Kindle for reading, a PS3 for games and a 3DS for portable games (oooh, closed platforms as well).

      The common theme for "people like me" is that we want technology that works, does it's job for us and does it with a bit of style or panache. We've weighed up the state of things, and chosen to use Apple products.

      Astroturfing or justification: more charitably, one might call it "replying to comments that I regard are inaccurate or misrepresentative". There seems to be a unique disdain for Apple on Slashdot and other technical forums. And yet many of the IT professionals I've met and worked with over the years (in the education, science and now finance spheres) either use or would like to use Apple equipment.

      Like I say, it's early in the morning (05:19 now) and I've rambled enough. Take it easy, enjoy your choices and let me enjoy mine without considering it an affront to all that you hold dear. Life, for me, really is to short to worry about replacing a battery for $130 or $100 - sorry.

    127. Re:Christ... by ratbag · · Score: 1

      What is wrong with this picture? The fact that all my Macs (seriously, all of them) and some of my old PCs are still in use, since I've passed them to other people. Ditto my PSP, GBA and DS. Ha ha, I've defeated the evil built-in obsolescence, thwarting Apple's vice-president of premature-techno-rot. My iPhone 3GS is now my car's music player. I still have both my old iPods. My iPad 1 is now my four-year old nephew's favourite gadget. For all the alleged obsolescence, some of these middle-class trinkets sure are built to last. Still waiting for any of them to self-destruct.

      I'm pleased you enjoy your 2007 MBP - I owned an MBP15 and it was a fantastic machine for me - I'm looking at the machine right now, since it's now my wife's computer. But more megapixels on my camera and the rise of virtualisation meant I upgraded to a new machine, since I needed more CPU, more RAM and more storage. Progress? I don't know, but I wouldn't go back to my 3MP Canon D30 now I'm using 22MP and 16.1MP bodies and I wouldn't sacrifice the flexibility of virtual machines, so I needed the new machine.

    128. Re:Christ... by ratbag · · Score: 1

      Interesting stuff, although your statement "they even went to the trouble of" is perhaps casting unnecessary aspersions. What we can say is that the SSD performance on the new laptops is pretty good: http://www.anandtech.com/show/6005/apples-new-ssd-its-fast

      We don't know if Apple's proprietary solution is better than mSATA. The fact it's different is a negative for some customers, neutral to others (such as me).

    129. Re:Christ... by gullevek · · Score: 1

      Then don't sit in the Starbucks, go somewhere where they have a power outlet.

      --
      "Freiheit ist immer auch die Freiheit des Andersdenkenden" - Rosa Luxemburg, 1871 - 1919
    130. Re:Christ... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Also consider Babylon 5 came out in 1993, so assuming the cgi was done a year before release of the show, they would probably have been using Amigas considerably faster than the original 68000, and it was also possible to cluster lightwave rendering over a number of systems.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    131. Re:Christ... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      The other macbook pro models might be a better fit, however:

      Power users who want the ability to change ram/disks etc, are also likely to want the higher resolution display.
      I liked the larger screen of the 17" version, its never going to be hugely portable but is still a good machine to use around the house.

      As a user of the previous model of 17" macbook pro, what i wanted to see this time was the same 17", but with the high dpi display and a current model processor/gpu...
      However the way Apple are going, i will have to consider a different brand for my next laptop. Similarly, at work we currently use macbooks but having an easily replaceable drive is essential for us so it looks like a change is on the cards there too.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    132. Re:Christ... by adolf · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, I don't see many people lamenting anymore that TVs no longer have user-serviceable parts.

      Whatever.

      My TV has firmware which can be updated ("serviced") by an end-user, and I found the hardware itself to be remarkably easy to service when it decided to go "click-click-click-click-click-click-click" one day instead of turn on: Two capacitors, costing a total of exactly two dollars, and it's been right as rain since.

      Tools needed: Soldering iron, solder, and the ability to visually identify obviously-swollen capacitors.

      The hardest part was moving the thing around, but it's not the manufacturer's fault that I decided to buy a big LCD. Everything else was easy, including disassembly. The failed caps were mounted on a single-sided board, so even if I totally botched the job the first time it'd have been easy to try again.

      And nevermind DLP and LCD projectors with light bulbs that eventually get tired, which are often rather pain-free to replace.

      (And, yes: I expect normal people to be able to do this sort of stuff, just as I expect them to be able to jump start their own car without incidental electrical fires. Your expectations may vary.)

    133. Re:Christ... by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      Anyone who can't manage to wield the 'special tool' (a screwdriver with a different head, just like many mobile phones have had for years) really shouldn't be attempting to do anything at all to service their laptops. I agree that Apple have made it less user-servicable than previous models (though not the Air, which is hugely popular), but I disagree with your assessment of their motives. The vast majority of people simply aren't interested in taking their laptops to bits, and the vast majority go from the shop shelf to the scrapyard with the cover never having been opened. Having said that, the huge aftermarket in DIY and mom-and-pop-shop repairs and upgrades for iPads and iPhones calls into question your hyperbole.

    134. Re:Christ... by olau · · Score: 1

      Not that I care much, but there was a piece floating around a couple of years ago on Li-battery tech with some measurements. It's probably still on Google. The batteries degrade from heat. In other words, if you put cpuburn on the thing and let it sit for a year connected to AC, the battery may be pretty much dead.

      When it comes to batteries, you shouldn't trust manufacturers.

    135. Re:Christ... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      So there are no slots... but I imagine on the 8GB model mainboard, you'll find a conspicuous gap somewhere for soldering extra memory chips in.

    136. Re:Christ... by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      I'm sure his point still stands, as well as for anyone else outside the US. Three and a half times the cost of generic is still three and a half times the cost. If the prices on Apple products are phenomenally out of whack compared to generic parts, that sounds like an Apple pricing issue to me, not the price of all memory in the UK.

      But, much like the Slashdot crowd doesn't matter to Apple, I'm sure anyone outside the US doesn't, either. Well, except for all those Chinese people who actually put all the computers together, of course.

    137. Re:Christ... by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      So why hasn't anyone else built something better already?

      It is certainly not because they cannot do it. IC manufacturing technology handles much higher densities, so making a screen with this resolution should be a breeze.

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    138. Re:Christ... by monkeyhybrid · · Score: 1

      You're right that UK prices for this sort of thing suck, but you've missed the point about Apple's pricing and the Newegg price you quote for RAM is for 16GB, comparing to an 8GB upgrade from Apple.

      Considering Apple have fantastic buying power and it doesn't cost them any more for their pick and place machines to solder 16GB chips than 8GB, the Apple tax is obvious whatever side of the Atlantic you are on.

      8GB upgrade from UK retailer - £45
      8GB upgrade from Apple UK - £160

      8GB upgrade from USA retailer (Corsair from Newegg) - $58
      8GB upgrade from Apple US - $200

    139. Re:Christ... by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      I have used my Apple products for a long time as well. My concerns are largely based on speculation as to the consequences of Apple's gluing in batteries and soldering ram on what were previously fairly upgradable computers. In my area there are several mac specific computer stores that specialize in resurrecting old mac products. I worry that this will become more difficult. In other words, I worry that Apple is changing course on product durability.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    140. Re:Christ... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I've got a MacBook Pro that's a couple of years old, and while it's technically got user servicable parts, absolutely none of them are accessible from outside the case. You have to tear the whole thing down to do something as simple as replacing the hard drive.

      I'll put that down to you being ill-informed about a 2 year old MBP that you own, rather than assume you're trying to deceive.

    141. Re:Christ... by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      I could easily link a $1400 laptop that has superior specs in various areas

      Highly, highly doubtful.

    142. Re:Christ... by Grudge2012 · · Score: 1

      How long did you use them? Because the battery will die, eventually. Apple claims you've got, at best, three to four years before the battery is basically useless.

      Sure - but then you will actually still be able to buy a replacement battery, unlike for most PC notebooks that old.

    143. Re:Christ... by Grudge2012 · · Score: 1

      Maybe they don't have a shiny aluminum case, but all that matters for is show-off value anyway.

      And rigidity and weight and thickness and recyclability.

      But no the aluminum case is only there to be shiny.

      If only it weren't matte.

    144. Re:Christ... by Grudge2012 · · Score: 1

      No shit. Strip out theings like ethernet pors to make it less functional. ie ... cut manufacturing costs. And toss in a fancy display. Marvel my ass.

      Having seen one of these in person: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphic_display_resolutions#WQUXGA_.283840.C3.972400.29

      I am not impressed.

      Oddly enough, just about everyone who has actually seen Apple's screen was impressed. Maybe there is more to it than just the pixel count (even when not ignoring spatial resolution).

    145. Re:Christ... by oxdas · · Score: 1

      If that is true (I don't know what the numbers are), then high end screens account for 4 million out of 55 million screens sold or about 7%. While margins are undoubtedly higher on those screens, it doesn't really address the issue of which has more weight with manufacturers, the 7% at the top or the 93% at the bottom. Your argument depends on the profit margins of those 7% of screens. According to Digitimes, Apple pays over $150 each for the screens, which is about 3x the price of a run-of-the-mill laptop screen and $50 more per screen than Asus pays for its IPS panels. It doesn't give us any insight into profit margins, but it is possible that margins are high enough for those components to be worth more than the 93%.

      We also know that two of Apple's three main suppliers, LG and Sharp, both lost significant money last year (but screens are a small part of their businesses), while Apple's other supplier, Samsung, made lots of money, but 70% of their profit was came from their own phones, tablets, and laptops.

      Without more information, the only lesson I see here is that components in general are not a very profitable business, which means that Apple's suppliers have a strong incentive to favor their own products over Apple's. While Apple, no doubt, wields influence at these companies, I am not seeing the kinds of revenue and profits that would allow Apple to dictate terms or buy out supplies of components also desired by these companies own products ( as suggested above).

      http://forums.appleinsider.com/t/150674/apple-rumored-to-pay-at-least-150-for-macbook-pro-retina-display-panels

    146. Re:Christ... by thefixer(tm) · · Score: 1

      If I have an idea and I ask someone else to build it, it's not innovation? I'm confused. Seriously, Apple works very closely with OEMs to guide them in the direction of innovations and products that will help them improve key technologies. OEMs may come to Apple with ideas and directions they feel they will be able to take technology, but at the end of the day, they're just factories implementing what their customers want.

      There's an inherent cost in taking risks, like telling an OEM you want millions of dollars of product that no one else is buying to put in your next computer. It's even more costly because you are the ONLY one buying that product, so these OEMs are manufacturing solely for you. Any advantage you get for buying in bulk comes solely from your own sales. You don't get to leverage off the fact that there are 10 other companies using the same display and making them cheaper.

      I suspect that's why the ram is ridiculous, Apple is buying ram that no one else is using. They may have a good reason for it, it may just be frivolous expense for a marginal gain, but they will pay more for it than anyone else because they are the first ones doing it. I remember the first time I held 256MB RAM chips in my hands. At the time, I had 8 of the only 12 sticks of production RAM in existence. I was more than shocked when someone explained to me that I was holding 2 million dollars worth of ram in a little tiny box. I freely admit I'm talking out of my ass about the current ram pricing, but I know the culture well enough to feel I'm probably right. And if you don't like it, you can wait a few years and some other company will (poorly) copy what Apple is doing and make it available cheaper, once it's been proven to make a profit and their is no risk involved.

    147. Re:Christ... by BevanFindlay · · Score: 1

      Actually, I would complain if our TV didn't have user-serviceable parts... We have an LCD TV with built-in DVD drive, and I recently had to fix the DVD drive. On a student income, replacing the unit outright isn't an option.

      Also, they have sacrificed features for space - ethernet port, optical drive. The latter particularly is something Jo Average will likely miss (of course, it will also funnel traffic to the iTunes store instead as they won't be buying physical disks...)

      But yes, an engineering student with 10 years tech support experience (including laptop servicing, which even among techs is a bit more specialised) is not Apple's target market. :-)

    148. Re:Christ... by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      That's dumb logic. With that, you could just as easily say 16GB of RAM from Apple is only $200, but 8GB is free! Spin works both ways.

    149. Re:Christ... by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      In my current laptop, my original battery started to bulge after two years. I walked into an Apple store, patiently waiting 30 minutes to see someone at the genius bar, and received my complimentary replacement battery.

      Where the hell did you do that? They told me to fuck off, because I hadn't bought the Apple Care extended warranty. Or did you but the extended warranty?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    150. Re:Christ... by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      No, I simply dont like when supposedly technical folk on slashdot try to justify a massive markup and then claim its not a massive markup.

      If youve been following my post youve already seen the laptops ive linked that have the same or better specs-- with the sole exception of the resolution-- for $1400, and yet somehow that extra $1400 doesnt count as gouging. And of course the soldered on RAM is for the customer's own good.

      If you like Macs, fine, buy one. Just dont try to convince the rest of us that its anything other than either A) a very niche need, or B) an overpriced status purchase.

    151. Re:Christ... by graphius · · Score: 1

      Your "deal-breaker" is a feature for many "normal" users

      I would give you your argument for an imac, or a regular macbook, but the "PRO" version is, I would guess, aimed at pro's. These are people (ignoring the few who buy one for status reasons) who will use their laptop for work.
      As a photographer, I constantly upgrade my laptop and desktop ram and hard drive. I buy a machine that will work for me now, and is within my budget, then, as requirements change (new camera, more bloated software **cough**Photoshop**cough**) I incrementally upgrade.

      And your other analogies break down too. There are damn few cars that require more than basic tools to replace an engine, hell, find me a car that doesn't have a hood that opens up for access to said engine. It is actually part of the building code that all plumbing (read sinks, toilets, hot water tanks, etc) have easily accessed shutoff valves TO MAKE WORK ON THEM EASIER.

      No, Apple screwed up on this one. The sad thing is that their fans will probably buy macbooks anyway.

    152. Re:Christ... by rwven · · Score: 1

      That would matter if ANYONE recycled laptops...

    153. Re:Christ... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      The price turns out to be $199 battery and service.. Good try though.

    154. Re:Christ... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      1000 full cycles to 80% does not really mean 3 or 4 years to completely useless.

    155. Re:Christ... by Wovel · · Score: 1

      But you cant link a slimmer laptop with discrete graphics for any price. You can't even do that with the old MBP. People all have different ideas of superior.

    156. Re:Christ... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I would suggest to you thinking about this problem the wrong way. Generally the same equipment in a factor is not used to make low end or high parts. Often these are totally different factories. The manufacturers may own both but the high end factories serve the high end market and the low end factories serve the low end market.

      As far as the profit model... it comes down to how they choose to depreciate their assets. Lets say a factory costing $1b makes a computer widget that can make 1m units a month:

      for months 0-6 costs $150 to fabricate and sells for $500
      for months 7-12 costs $140 to fabricate and sells for $400
      for months 12-24 costs $130 to fabricate and sells for $300
      for months 24-36 costs $120 to fabricate and sells for $200
      for months 36-48 costs $100 to fabricate and sells for $150
      for months 48-60 costs $100 to fabricate and sells for $100

      And anytime after month 36 that factory could be converted in 3 months time for $A to make widget v2
      that sells for the same but only costs $75 to fabricate.

      How you choose to depreciate the factory during those 60 months has a lot to do with how you view your profits. For example you could depreciate the entire factory during the 36 months since it becomes obsolete...

    157. Re:Christ... by oxdas · · Score: 1

      I don't see how this addresses the argument. Both Samsung and LG have low and high end products. Since their own products have much higher profit margins, they will favor their own products over Apple. The primary advantage for these companies is that making products for Apple, among others, helps them reach a scale, build and retain expertise, etc. that reduces the cost for their own products.

      If, on the other hand, you have some evidence that making screens is a high margin business, I would love to see it. I just don't see how anything else makes sense for these companies, regardless of how they depreciate their assets.

    158. Re:Christ... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      For a product that has expensive fixed costs, how you depreciate effects how you compute profit margins. That's the point. There is no objective way to look at this for which statistics exist easily or possibly at all. The companies might not even know that data.

      The point I'm making is that you are trying to think of this across all their factories in a single quarter. A better way to think of this is in terms of the life cycle of a factory. A young factory (high end) needs high end products, they don't care what's happening to the older factories. While the older factories need low end products.

    159. Re:Christ... by oxdas · · Score: 1

      I guess I still don't understand how this addresses my argument. Just to remind you, the argument being addressed was that Apple can monopolize the entire production of high end screens (which is what I was arguing against). Are you suggesting that Samsung, with $3.8 billion in profit last quarter would not invest in a new factory for high end screens without Apple because that factory would lose significant (more) money? Samsung's display division lost $19 million last quarter. Certainly how they depreciated these factories played a role, but I still don't see any evidence that Samsung would not invest in high end displays without Apple. Nor do I see evidence that they would threaten their own products (to which they allocated 70% of their profits) by selling their entire high-end display capacity to Apple. If anything, I see a company that does not view display manufacturing as a profit center and is willing to lose money on it in order to build their own products.

      As for the perspective necessary to analyze this; Samsung, LG, and Sharp are not viewing each factory individually when making their business decisions. For the purposes of this argument, analyzing all their business (not just the factories), is, I believe, the proper perspective.

    160. Re:Christ... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Yes I would suggest that. And this isn't unique, for example with IBM's G5 processor they moved the bulk of the line downmarket when Microsoft offered to commit to 50m units for the XBox. A large committed customer can shift a producer's view of the market. We've had very high resolutions screens for a while, they sold mostly for medical uses at the $10k-20k range. No one, was building them in a way for mass distribution. Without the subsidies and commitments that Apple provided it wasn't safe.

      I agree that Samsung could easily do whatever they want on screens. But without Apple, why would they? What products do they have that need those screens?

    161. Re:Christ... by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Just saw numbers: http://www.digitimes.com/news/a20120612PD219.html

      Retina screens (in volume) are running them 4x the cost of the other screens. So about 8% by volume of screens but about 30% by volume of cost.

    162. Re:Christ... by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      No warranty, at the Apple store in north Austin. And I did expect to pay for it; not even being asked to pay was a pleasant surprise.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    163. Re:Christ... by Lord+Flipper · · Score: 1

      I think you're pretty lucky. My late 2008 MBP shows: Full Charge Capacity (mAh): 2741, Cycle count: 73, Condition: Service Battery.

    164. Re:Christ... by cgoodric · · Score: 1

      I replaced my 17" MBPR hard drive with a 480GB SSD made by Corsair (Force GT model.) Man, it just screams. It's the standard 2.5" form factor that most laptops use.

    165. Re:Christ... by Alex+Zepeda · · Score: 1

      Maybe it helps to be nicer? *shrug*

      Earlier this year I took my black MacBook in because of a bulging battery. The Apple employee tried a few times to get it to netboot (so they could run their diagnostics) with no luck. In the end the employee just grabbed a battery off of the shelf and swapped it out for me. No paperwork, no checking of serial numbers, etc. Yes, I bought the extended warranty. No, he didn't even ask (and it had expired a few months prior). And, yes, the *new* battery said "service battery" for a week or so.

      That kinda thing is exactly why I'm not interested in a difficult to replace battery. Instead of a ten second swap, you've got to do some serious work to get at the battery. More work equals less goodwill equals a lower chance of getting a free battery replacement. It's a shame really, as Apple had been trending towards more owner repairable hardware (iBook -> MacBook, Mini -> Unibody Mini).

      --
      The revolution will be mocked
  3. "effectively unrepairable by the user" by couchslug · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Appliance buyers don't tear down their toaster very often either.

    That said, it's cool from my perspective since it will result in "dead lappies for cheap" which will motivate people who like to tinker and build machines from organ donors.

    I won't be buying one. The ability to quickly repair Thinkpads is a key reason I buy them instead.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    1. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if your toaster was $3000, you'd have a point.

    2. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Appliance buyers don't tear down their toaster very often either.

      Your childhood sucked didn't it?

    3. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I won't be buying one of them either. A $200 price premium for 8GB ram is ridiculous. 16GB will feel cramped 2 or 3 years down the road. Last I checked, 16GB RAM costs $120 meaning that you're paying $200 for an memory upgrade that should cost $60.

      Bring back memory sockets.

    4. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by alen · · Score: 1

      So? for most people this will be powerful enough that they won't feel the need to upgrade it. Like most Acura/Lexus drivers they will buy this as a treat for themselves and not for any real need for all the computing power it has.

      its also a pretty good gaming machine and will probably steal a lot of alienware and other silly computer case company customers

    5. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by alen · · Score: 1

      ditto for repairing

      for most people they won't want to repair it. and the cost of paying someone plus the parts to repair it will be close enough to sell it for the parts and buy a new laptop

    6. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Tr3vin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If my toaster cost $3000, I think I'd have money to pay a toaster repairman.

    7. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by roc97007 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > Appliance buyers don't tear down their toaster very often either.

      Not very often. On the other hand, toasters last longer, (ours is over 17 years old, my mother-in-law's still functional toaster is from a time when Bakelite was considered a valid construction material) and don't cost nearly as much. And they *are* fixable by anyone with a screwdriver and some aptitude.

      > I won't be buying one. The ability to quickly repair Thinkpads is a key reason I buy them instead.

      Agreed. Exactly. I just recently "repaired" my daughter's T30 -- open one door, replace battery, open a different door, replace hard drive, install OS, done.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    8. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes FOOL, but this is iRam.

      Which is much shinier than regular RAM.

      One could say it's an ENGINEERING MARVEL TO BEHOLD!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    9. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by necro81 · · Score: 1

      children don't often buy toasters, at least not with their own money, solely so that they can tear them down. There's no need: they can inherit endless cast-off appliances for free.

    10. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>"dead lappies for cheap" which will motivate people who like to tinker and build

      I go to ebay for that. Laptops for $20 plus shipping. The only thing wrong with them is that they are running older OSes like XP, or newer OSes like Vista but with only 1/2 gig of RAM. Lubuntu linux runs just fine on small memory spaces. (I've also acquired cheap DVRs and CRTs.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    11. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Silly argument. Most expensive toaster is http://most-expensive.net/toaster at a little over $350.00 Although I can get a turbo Chef for around $3000, but it does more than toast.

      And if I could afford to have a turbo chef in my home kitchen, I'd not bother with an icky repair man in my home, buy a new one where the icky delivery guys are only here for a few minutes.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      Acura and Lexus drivers are just posers that cant afford Caddilac, Mercedes, or BMW.

      OS in comparison, IT's like wanting a macbook Air and buying an ACER.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    13. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2

      Appliance buyers don't tear down their refrigerators very often either.

      So how often do you "repair" your daughter's T30? Is half an hour off the "repair" time, once every couple of years, REALLY worth carrying around the extra fittings to give you easily accessible components?

    14. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by adisakp · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's DDR3L SDRAM - that L stands for low-power. If you can even find a high-speed DDR3L sodimm, you will pay more for it than for the Apple memory. What do you get with that L? Maybe about an hour more battery life with 16GB installed. Is 17% longer battery life worth the $100 premium? Probably to most people spending $3K or more on a laptop already.

    15. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by pev · · Score: 1

      Actually, I've bought a broken classic Dualit toaster from ebay and replaced the damaged elements. They're superb bits of kit but I'd never spend £150 on a new one.

    16. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by pev · · Score: 1

      I just recently "repaired" my daughter's T30 -- open one door, replace battery, open a different door, replace hard drive, install OS, done.

      I thought it was only the evil manufacturers that insisted on wiping the machine and putting a new OS on when all you wanted to replace was the battery... Daughter can't have been too happy! :-D

    17. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by fermion · · Score: 1
      There are two things that go wrong with the Macbooks since their introduction. The first, and foremost, has been the DVD drive, which fails in 1-2 years. My latest DVD drive is still working, which I find amazing, though I did not use it very much. The second is the hard disk, which fails after 2 years. The third is they keyboard gets messed up.

      All these have been removed from the current Macbook. The hard disk is gone, the dvd player is gone, the keyboard has been redesigned to be reliable, getting rid of the light up feature. If you consider the Applecare as part of the purchase price, which is pretty much what is needed, there is no repairs. The only other thing I have had to replace was the Airport board, which according to the teardown just pops out. All one needs is the special driver.

      I thought I would have a problem with the current MacBook Air. I find the reliability and battery life after a year to be very acceptable. It really is in better condition than the previous Macbook pros. One thing may be the simplicity and lightness of the product, and the solid hinges unlike the previous bad design. Which is not to say there is not annoying issues. The inability to upgrade ram is a problem. This is not as bad as it used to be, as Apple upgrades you from 8 gb to 16 gb at $25 a GB, well within market values.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    18. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      You can easily pay more than $2000 for a toaster. That's just first link I clicked on after searching commercial toasters on Google. I'm pretty sure people who own these types of toasters get them serviced quite regularly.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    19. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      So you carry around a Panasonic toughbook then?

      If we are comparing Anything and not just consumer, I am certain I can find a military laptop that costs well over $25,000.00!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    20. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Your childhood sucked didn't it?"

      Shit no! I had fun. Heavy Trash day back in "the day" meant all sorts of cool stuff including 1930s radios (mmm...Bakelite...) tools, books (yay for prosperous old neighborhoods in North Jersey), lawn mowers needing a carb cleaning, etc.

      I don't have to buy a thing new to tear it apart to see how it works, I let Other People buy it first.

      What I learned has paid off nicely. I don't need new cars and have never bought one new. I don't need collision coverage and can run liability insurance instead. I fix and renovate and mod most of what I own, and easily afford commercial-quality tools to do that with.

      As for notebooks, I ask people who maintain corporate fleets of notebooks what makes and models are good. I don't own trucks a mechanic wouldn't buy for themselves, and I don't buy notebooks which aren't PROVEN to be good machines.

      Let the Early Adopters fry their shit instead. There is no downside to doing it this way.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    21. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "One could say it's an ENGINEERING MARVEL TO BEHOLD!"

      'Cept I cain't BE HOLDING it outside de notebook it comes in, lessin' I de-solder it.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    22. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Appliance buyers don't tear down their toaster very often either.

      The ability to upgrade the hard drive and RAM without paying the exorbitant Apple tax certainly is something that will be missed, however.

    23. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by BigSes · · Score: 1

      Yes FOOL, but this is iRam.

      Which is much shinier than regular RAM.

      You forgot to mention that the iRam DIMMs have rounded edges!

    24. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      If i paid $3000 for a toaster I wouldn't be able to afford bread.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    25. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      So how many of them did you buy (new) before tearing apart?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    26. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I did that once. Ended up evacuating the family into the garden while I researched the toxicity of the the refrigerant mist rapidly enveloping the living room. I let them back in once I'd determined that it's actually quite harmless - the only risk it poses is displacing the air in confined spaces.

    27. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      > So how often do you "repair" your daughter's T30? Is half an hour off the "repair" time, once every couple of years, REALLY worth carrying around the extra fittings to give you easily accessible components?

      Well, lessee, it's 15 years old, and I've "repaired" it (replaced hard drive and battery) three times, and the screen one time. That's four times I did not have to buy a new laptop. Yes, it really is worth carrying around the extra fittings, and this is a selling point for me when buying a new device. Even were I a non-geek who always had someone else open the battery door, the ability of a reasonably handy person to repair the device would still be a factor.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    28. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The resolution is too high for gaming on a laptop GPU.

      --
      Good-bye
    29. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Good point about the "system restore" disc -- I hate it when online support suggests that to a hapless consumer as a solution for a driver problem. They should be ashamed.

      But in this case, the hard drive was dying, and she wanted a bigger one anyway. We did back up her data first.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    30. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Golden_Rider · · Score: 1

      its also a pretty good gaming machine and will probably steal a lot of alienware and other silly computer case company customers

      Yes, definitely. Especially since the built-in graphics card will be able to handle all that graphics glory at the native resolution of the display. Or maybe not, and you'll have to scale down the resolution and it will look like crap (as some screenshots in various reviews already have shown). Oh, and thank god that 256GB disk space of the cheaper 15" model (no upgrade available) is large enough to have your OSX *plus* Bootcamp installs plus game and data (since, for games, you will need Windows on the machine).

    31. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by PayPaI · · Score: 2

      10 seconds with google finds this:
      http://www.ramexperts.com/ddr3/laptop/pc3-12800-1600mhz/mushkin-992038-ddr3-sodimm-8gb-pc3l-12800-1600mhz-sodimm-204p-11-11-11-28-1-35v.html

      8GB PC3L-12800 1600MHZ SODIMM $65/ea.
      That's $130 for 16GB, vs $180 from Apple. Maybe the extra $50 is the cost of soldering it to the motherboard?

    32. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I think this really just reflects Apple's view of the products they're selling. They are selling an integrated product that is supposed to be viewed as an indivisible unit. They don't believe that there is actually a huge market for people who want to perform after-market upgrades of their own laptops. The market that exists probably doesn't have many people who would consider buying from Apple anyway.

      So instead of making everything modular and upgradable, they've focused on making the product itself as tightly integrated as possible. The hardware is all optimized to fit into a tiny little package while maintaining high performance, and then the OS and drivers and applications are built to run on that specific hardware. They believe they can provide a better overall product by integrating the whole stack and keeping things uniform instead of creating a platform that encourages casual tinkering.

      For better and worse.

    33. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      No, something like this toaster would be equivalent of your $25,000 military laptop. The $2000 toaster I pointed to before is just some run of the mill you'd find and any local diner. When you business is serving toast to people, having a $2000 toaster isn't all that extravagant. It's practically a necessity. Same thing. If you're a professional who works on a computer every day, then spending $2000 on a laptop is nothing.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    34. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      On a shitty, low end GPU at that.

      Over 2k and you don't get at least a 670m? The range goes from 650m to 680m right now.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    35. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      So http://www.grievecorp.com/catalog/Continuous-Ovens/Conveyor-Ovens/Conveyor-Ovens.html this toaster is closer then....

      Cince we are changing the world oven into " toaster". Wouldn't a B52 bomber loaded with Nuclear bombs also be considered a toaster at this point?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    36. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      At the age of five I found that a burning toaster makes a hell of a contrail sailing out the window to land in the yard below, subsequently and completely accidentally further incinerating the plastic slide there...

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    37. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Acura and Lexus drivers are just posers that cant afford Caddilac, Mercedes, or BMW.

      The quote I always remember--I think it was from Guy Kawasaki--is that driving a Mercedes shows how much you make, driving an Acura shows how much you know. And driving a Porsche shows how well you can lie on a car loan application.

    38. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

      *open a different door, replace hard drive, install OS, done.*

      Darn those evil manufacturers, forcing you to install an OS on a blank drive. What world are we living in?!?

      --
      I've got better things to do tonight than die.
    39. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      The ability to quickly repair Thinkpads is a key reason I buy them instead.

      Worst selling point ever. "Look, when this breaks down, it's easy to fix!"

    40. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Ditto on the toaster thing. For the "dead lappies for cheap" thing? Good luck on that one - Apple provides pretty good service if the thing broke down. Those type of customers will go there to fix it, maybe trade it, instead of listed on ebay/kijiji to sell it for cheap.

    41. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by PayPaI · · Score: 2

      And you should have spent an additional 10 seconds (maybe more, it was running slow) to look at the pictures linked in the main article.
      The MacBook Pro Retina has 16 DDR3L chips on each side of the motherboard, and the SO-DIMM I linked has 8 DDR3L chips on each side of each piece. That's 16 * 2 = 32 chips on the MBP, and 8 * 2 * 2 = 32 (two pieces, two sides each) chips in the linked memory.
      Which one is higher density? (The chips are the same size)
      The cost of soldering thing was a joke, btw, and it maks me sad to have to even mention that.

    42. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Logic+and+Reason · · Score: 1

      Is your one-hour estimate based on anything, or just a guess?

    43. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Couchslug.... wish I had mod point.... preach on brother.

    44. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Yep.... that is one of the things I like about the MBP... long battery life for work in the field. The display resolution and weight are 2 of the other things I really like.

    45. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      There is a downside, in that you will never have the cutting edge equipment... You will always be behind the curve. How much this matters of course is down to personal taste, and is less important for mature technology when even a couple of years old is still fully usable.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    46. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Kharny · · Score: 1

      your car comparison went wrong, who in their right mind would prefer a caddilac over a lexus?

      --
      Make a man a fire and he will be warm for a day, set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life
    47. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by adolf · · Score: 1

      Every time my 17-year-old car starts showing early signs of doom, I feed it some new OEM parts that will last another decade or more.

      I term the expense of the parts a "car payment". I term the time spent a "learning exercise." If it's beyond my ability to repair, I call it a "boat payment" (in homage to Car Talk).

      It is both the least expensive and most awesome car I've ever driven, even counting a transmission swap. The car even includes a factory toolkit which can accomplish a variety of maintenance tasks, which I've found very useful indeed (though mostly on other people's cars when I find someone stranded and in need of a quick fix, who I normally find to be cursing their cars very existence until they see how easy some things can be with an ounce of preparedness and a willingness to think).

      I'd be well into the payments on second brand-new car, by now, if I weren't interested in maintaining things when they wear out. But instead I'm currently thinking about minor bodywork and paint: Expensive, but still cheaper than throwing it away and buying something else that is comparable.

      And yes, I also tear down my refrigerator when it misbehaves: It just takes a few screws to get to the guts. I also fix my own vacuum cleaner instead of toss it and buy another. And I service my own HVAC gear. And my dishwasher. And when the head gasket blew up on my air compressor, I made a new one out of a Dr. Pepper can.

      FFS, when the faucet on the kitchen sink was acting wonky, I was annoyed. But I didn't call someone else to replace it -- I called the manufacturer, who sent out the parts to repair it for free...which is their policy. Service!

      My first PDA was a Handspring Visor, and the factory stylus included a screwdriver just in case the device needed disassembling for some reason.

      Things wear out. That doesn't mean they're used up, but just that they need a little bit of attention. But if maintenance is actively prohibited by the design of a product, I find myself actively repelled from buying it.

      Your mileage, I gather, varies. Best of luck!

    48. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Wovel · · Score: 1

      In most cases a similar Lexus will cost more than a caddilac..

    49. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by Wovel · · Score: 1

      I bet your daughter wishes it wasn't repairable.

    50. Re:"effectively unrepairable by the user" by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Well, firstly, the T30 is not junk, and going along with the general theme of the discussion here, you can still do useful things with it, so there's no real reason to swap it out. This is a concept that seems alien to Apple fans -- the concept of Good Enough. The processor, although single core, runs at the same speed as my workstation (which is admittedly four core). The T30 is still useful as a web client, and has acceptable response running M$ Office for homework.

      Secondly, this is not the only computer she owns. She also has a tablet (unfortunately running Windows 7 Pro, a necessary evil at least for now) and a desktop machine. When we got the tablet the T30 went into retirement, but she recently asked that I revive it because she was getting annoyed with trying to work Win7 on a tablet. (Windows doesn't handle the touch interface very well.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  4. No dvd drive is too soon for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I likes me optical media in a laptop still. The time to do without is coming very soon, but not quite yet.

    1. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by DurendalMac · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because Apple isn't selling a Thunderbolt -> Ethernet adapter for a whopping $29 or anything.

    2. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Another piece of clutter for my bag. How nice of them. I can't work out why they'd lose it - if they were that tight on space, why not lose the HDMI instead? My theory is that they want to make people buy more thunderbolt stuff, espicially their expensive thunderbolt monitor-slash-docking-station.

    3. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by CaptBubba · · Score: 1

      I thought we were rid of dongles years ago.

      I expected a more elegant solution from Apple. The thunderbolt adapters for Ethernet and FW800 aren't even daisy-chainable! That just seems silly on a flash-based high-end laptop where access to external drives and NAS is going to be critical for power users.

    4. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by CaptBubba · · Score: 1

      The port was too thick and constrained how thin they could make the device. As to why they didn't just do like they did with mini-DP and make a new standard... yeah you are probably right they want to push Thunderbolt.

    5. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the only "pros" are the ones doing what you're doing. Nope, no one ever needs to do other stuff.

    6. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by ShadyG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ethernet sockets are too high. HDMI is low. It's not about horizontal space for the ports, it's about making the laptop thinner.

    7. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      Optical drives occupy a huge amount of internal volume and are mechanically delicate. I backed up my 80 GB music collection on DVD once. Never. Again.

    8. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by toriver · · Score: 1

      Ethernet? A niche need in this day and age.

    9. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Ethernet? A niche need in this day and age.

      No more of a niche than USB. Everything's wireless these days and if you need USB or Ethernet or VGA or DVI or Displayport or digital audio it seems they just suggest you use a dongle, seemingly Thunderbolt.

    10. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      I don't want any optical media anymore.... they all break. I would rather have an external one than waste space in the laptop I cart around all the time.

      Make them smaller and powerful... but kick the optical media to the curb already.
      That ship has sailed already.

    11. Re:No dvd drive is too soon for me by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      I welcome them getting rid of the optical drive. They consume about 1/4 the space in the 15 inch and 1/3 in the 13 inch. I haven't used my optical drive for OS X in a couple of years. Installing Snow Leopard and burning CDs for my old car I think was the last time I used it.

      If you really need an optical drive. Apple do one for £65 http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MC684ZM/A or you can get a different branded one at half the price from elsewhere.

      I do burn CD/DVDs, we have a duplicator that burns 16 disks at a time and a DLT drive for sending masters for pressing. It used to churn out many hundreds of disks a week, now lucky to get an order each month for a handful, it is all Internet distributed.

  5. More than 1080p by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    At least Apple is recognising that there is a market for monitors with more than 1080p. Hopefully, the new display will be a success, and other manufactures will finally some out with truly high def monitors for less than a car payment again.

    1. Re:More than 1080p by bhcompy · · Score: 2

      Yet it's a measly 15 inches.. but it is 16:10, so I'll give them that. It's an improvement over this 16:9 shit standard nowadays

    2. Re:More than 1080p by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      A measly 15"? I want this display in a 13" laptop.

    3. Re:More than 1080p by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      That's what the Air is for. I expect a large display for a workhorse laptop like the MBP.

    4. Re:More than 1080p by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      15 inches is small. Give me 24 or 27

    5. Re:More than 1080p by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      > Yet it's a measly 15 inches.. but it is 16:10, so I'll give them that. It's an improvement over this 16:9 shit standard nowadays

      Yes yes yes! Not an Apple fan, but 16:9 is pants!

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:More than 1080p by Kjella · · Score: 2

      Well apparently big and high PPI is more expensive and complicated than small and high PPI, but first the iPhone (3.5"), then the iPad (9.7") and now the MPB (15.4") it's pretty obvious to connect the dots on where this is going. I'd be very surprised if we did not have a high PPI iMac/Display within a year or so. Particularly since 4K TVs are finally starting to pop up in the market place, although still at outrageous prices.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    7. Re:More than 1080p by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      a 21" laptop is a sweet spot that I think apple could pull off as a Super macbook pro. I know a lot of artists, photographers and video people that would buy on in a heart beat. Give it dual hard drive bays, 32 gig ram capability, and it sweetens the deal.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    8. Re:More than 1080p by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      YAY !! Over Full HD on a 15incher ! I've never heard of anything more useless and overkill...

        Yes some people use higher resolutions, I use a 2500x1600 monitor everyday for instance, only it is 30 inches which MAKES SENSE.

        2880*1400 or whatever Retina display is, on a 15 inches screen is just stupid. Plain and simple stupid. There isn't any sort of application where it makes sense.

        And please please Puuuhhhleeaase don't talk about medical imagery, Visualization of big 3D Datasets, or photo editing and whatnot. If you doing this on a 15 inches MBP screen : "you're doing it wrong" ©. Resolution isn't even the most important aspect in these kind of work, it's collor gammut and contrast.

        For these kind of application you need a dedicated monitor and a desktop. This new MBP is just yet another (even more) expensive Facebook machine.

        Ok that's a bit harsh I hear you can play diablo 3 on it, although at Retina resolution is runs very poorly (how ironic..)

    9. Re:More than 1080p by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      I was hoping Apple finally found a way towards resolution independence, but it seems they just doubled the resolution in both dimensions to avoid that issue.

    10. Re:More than 1080p by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Why would they want to carry that around?
      If you are not carrying it around, why pay for a laptop?

    11. Re:More than 1080p by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Take it from the kitchen to the dining room to the basement to the back porch. Take it home on holidays when visiting family.
      How many "laptops" are actually carried around in the sense that they move from location to location every day compared to how many sit on the same table for weeks/months at a time?

    12. Re:More than 1080p by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note that most stuff is running at a lowly 1440x900 though. From FTA:

      By default, because of a lack of apps that have been designed with 220 PPI in mind, it looks like the MBP with Retina display will initially boot up with a 1440Ã--900 desktop workspace, but upscaled to 2880Ã--1800. The picture will still be perfectly sharp (1 square pixel is scaled up to become a square of 4 square pixels), but you wonâ(TM)t see beautiful, high-resolution typography or UI unless youâ(TM)re in a âoeRetina-awareâ application.

      1440x900 is actually a bit low, and it seems that most of the current "retina-aware" apps just 2x scale their UIs anyway so it isn't like you even get more space on screen. When you browse a web page everything is zoomed to 200%, so fonts are sharper but obviously images are exactly the same DPI as before. I presume you can browse at 100% zoom if you want to, but then everything will be microscopic.

      Rather than simply doubling the resolution so that everything scales nicely and text looks a bit sharper they should have gone for something like 1920x1280. High enough to look excellent but not so high that you can't really make use of it because everything has to be zoomed just so you can see it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:More than 1080p by ratbag · · Score: 1

      You don't need the resolution, so no-one else does?

      One use case for my current 13" MacBookAir: looking at GoPro videos "in the field", maybe converting them into editable format to do a bit of light editing. Limiting factors: speed of cpu and ability to see the unzoomed video in FCPX.

      Ah, here's a laptop with more power, a screen that does allow full size HD alongside an interface to work on it and retains most of the portability. I'd say that was a win for me. But here in the uniquely-skewed world of Slashdot all you hear is "wah! overkill-this, fanbois-that, too expensive, not advanced enough, no user serviceable parts (seriously? does anyone outside of Slashdot-land _want_ to service their own computer?)"

      And yes, when I get back to base, the heavy-lifting is done on a 24" and a 27" monitor and a fully-loaded MacPro, but I sure as hell can't take that with me on the mountains, or even the cabin, can I?

    14. Re:More than 1080p by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      The current air has a 1366x768 display and on 13" that sucks. I can see the pixels quite easily at normal use distance. I want my maximally corrected vision to be the limiting factor not the panel.

    15. Re:More than 1080p by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      It's called a mobile workstation. It isn't for putting on your lap, it's for taking to client sites or using in hotels with a desk. Not so much portable as luggable.

    16. Re:More than 1080p by ifrag · · Score: 1

      It's an improvement over this 16:9 shit standard nowadays

      Eh? I've recently changed from a 16:10 (1920x1200) to 16:9 (1920x1080) and I really am starting to prefer the 16:9. Pretty much all media content is going to be 16:9 anyway, and a lot of games are designed around preferring that layout as well. The only thing I really notice with 16:10 is media players can get a better stretch while in windowed mode. And perhaps slightly less frequent scrolling on some websites, not that big a deal.

      What exactly are you getting out of those pixels that is so amazing?

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    17. Re:More than 1080p by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Same reason I am carrying around an 18.5 inch laptop. It's easy to carry because I'm not a hobbit that has a problem with anything about the weight of a paperback.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    18. Re:More than 1080p by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      There are people that like to be able to easily move things around, but don't need it to be "portable" in the same sense that someone who's constantly going through airports would.

    19. Re:More than 1080p by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Vertical desktop space, displays 16:9 content perfectly(black bars that would otherwise be monitor bezels), games support it and run well(because outside of a few exceptions, mostly shit console ports, games scale to different resolutions well without problems of stretching and such), etc.

      I guess a better question is why are you accepting a downgrade in resolution for what is essentially the same cost?

    20. Re:More than 1080p by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      There isn't any sort of application where it makes sense.

      Said the guy who doesn't think that anyone does anything other than what he needs, and just wants to hate on a company he doesn't like for no good reason.

    21. Re:More than 1080p by s73v3r · · Score: 1

      Only for UI widgets, like buttons. For content views, you get the full resolution to work with.

    22. Re:More than 1080p by Nixoloco · · Score: 1

      The current air has a 1366x768 display and on 13" that sucks. I can see the pixels quite easily at normal use distance. I want my maximally corrected vision to be the limiting factor not the panel.

      Actually, the 13.3 inch MacBook Air has a 1440x900 display. The 11.6 inch one has a 1366x768 display. Still a bit low compared to the competition, but the 13 inches isn't that bad. I expect they may upgrade it in the next refresh.

    23. Re:More than 1080p by ifrag · · Score: 2

      games support it and run well (because outside of a few exceptions, mostly shit console ports, games scale to different resolutions well without problems of stretching and such)

      One of these "few exceptions" happens to be Starcraft II, which of course is PC exclusive, not a port. In this case the "downgrade" of resolution lets you see more content. See the section on HOR+ on FOV in video games.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    24. Re:More than 1080p by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      That would be retarded.

    25. Re:More than 1080p by funnyguy · · Score: 1

      You do realize that switching resolutions doesn't change the screen aspect, but only the linear pixel count? You you've effectively stretched things vertically. You would need horizontal black bars to effectively create a 1920x1080 screen on a 1920x1200 native display, otherwise you're skewing the image. So unless you added black bars or changed to new display hardware, you're not watching things in 16:9 or 16:10.

    26. Re:More than 1080p by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      My mistake, I have the 11.6, not the 13". I somehow mixed them up. Both are too low. This display at 11.6 would be great though.

    27. Re:More than 1080p by stms · · Score: 1

      Don't forget lack of an optical drive I DO NOT WANT an optical drive in my next laptop Apple or otherwise. I've been wanting this for about 4 years now. Yes I've been using the same laptop for 4 years.

    28. Re:More than 1080p by ifrag · · Score: 1

      I failed to mention I bought a new monitor. That's native for each of the 2 screens.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    29. Re:More than 1080p by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Hopefully, the new display will be a success, and other manufactures will finally some out with truly high def monitors for less than a car payment again.

      You don't want to know what I'd pay for a 22" monitor with good color and 4K vertical resolution. Several "car payments" at least.

      Heck, let's at least get those available on the market and then we can bitch about price.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    30. Re:More than 1080p by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      You can set it to 1920 x 1080.

    31. Re:More than 1080p by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1
    32. Re:More than 1080p by makomk · · Score: 1

      Apple actually killed off the 17-inch Macbook Pro with the 1920x1280 screen when they released the new 15-inch Pro with Retina Display, so the highest resolution you can get now is effectively 1440x900 - it's the native resolution of the non-Retina Display 15 inch model and the resolution emulated by the Retina Display model.

    33. Re:More than 1080p by Volguus+Zildrohar · · Score: 1

      A man goes into a hardware store, looking for wood for a home project. He asks the counter guy what kinds of wood are available, and he replies "we have oak, cedar, and pine".

      His colleague leans over and says "Don't forget yew". The first guy taps on his computer for a second and says "Oh, I didn't realise..."

      "Yew must be new here."

      --
      When confronted with one problem, some think "I'll use recursion". Now they are confronted with one problem.
    34. Re:More than 1080p by exomondo · · Score: 1

      the highest resolution you can get now is effectively 1440x900 - it's the native resolution of the non-Retina Display 15 inch model and the resolution emulated by the Retina Display model.

      No, because you can select screen resolutions up to 1920x1200, the screen is rendered at the full 2880x1800 and the scaled down to the selected screen resolution. 1440x900 is just the default.

    35. Re:More than 1080p by exomondo · · Score: 1

      Why would they want to carry that around?

      Why would you want to carry any size laptop around?

    36. Re:More than 1080p by jensen404 · · Score: 1

      They also improved the screen technology to IPS. If it has a similar color gamut to the new iPad, which is almost exactly sRGB, then it is on par with Apple's Cinema Display. Even when not considering resolution (or size), the display should be better than 98% of desktop displays.

    37. Re:More than 1080p by jensen404 · · Score: 2

      You can set the desktop size to be equivalent to a non-pixel-doubled 1920x1200. It renders the image internally at 3840x2400, then scales it down to the native resolution. Not as good as physically being output at 3840x2400, but it may still look better than native 1920x1200.

    38. Re:More than 1080p by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      Photographers take their laptops with them a lot of places when they are on field shoots and trips. I wouldn't want to carry a 21" laptop though.
      I am debating between a MB Air 13" and a new 15" MBPro right now. I will have to test to see which will be more functional for my travel work, but I suspect the new Display will be what really will make the difference for me. personally.

      If I need a big display I can plug the MB into the 27" cinema display... that works well, plus I have a portable computer when I am not doing production work at home.

    39. Re:More than 1080p by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      My eyes are tired. I think the extra resolution makes them seem less so. That is reason enough to get this incremental change.
      Within 3 years 60% of laptops will have this sort of resolution so I am not sure why you are saying it is useless overkill.
      For me it is not useless and I don't think it will be for most of the rest of everybody either.

      I seem to remember when I had my old Atari, people would say things like 64K memory.... who needs that much memory. What would you do with more than that even?
      People said the same thing about the 1 mb hard drives.... it is overkill. You could never come close to filling it up with every game out for the Atari.

      And yet.... here we are......and even now people think things are useless and overkill. They are not useless nor overkill ever.

    40. Re:More than 1080p by babthooka · · Score: 1

      Can you imagine the graphics card on one such sucker? That's not happening any time soon, I am guessing.

  6. no user-replaceable parts by rvw · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is quite annoying. When I bought my macbook three years ago, it had a 160GB harddrive. If I wanted to upgrade to 250GB I had to pay €130. I went to the nearest computershop and bought a 320GB drive for less then €100. That means I had a spare 160GB drive as well. The same goes for memory. I buy it via ebay in the US, for half the price. I hope there will be shops who will replace these parts for normal prices.

  7. Did I miss something? by thogard · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is something made with the current generation of components considered "an engineering marvel "?

    1. Re:Did I miss something? by matt_gaia · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because it has a shiny fruit on the back of it.... duh.

    2. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe not "marvel", but this laptop certainly is a very well-built, well-designed machine. This laptop is clearly more than "current generation of components". Many of them are custom designed to be as small and thin as possible. I'm not saying if that is good or bad, depending on what you are looking for, but this obviously is not just another case of throw together off the shelf components and call it a laptop.

    3. Re:Did I miss something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What other laptop on the market has a 220 DPI panel? Please, tell me, I hate buying Apple but that is one hell of a screen.

    4. Re:Did I miss something? by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By that argument nothing is an engineering marvel.

      And yet "current generation components" have to appear for the first time in something. And here it is.

      The technology in this laptop is a fair jump from what was available yesterday. I'd say it qualifies.

    5. Re:Did I miss something? by Matheus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd just like to read this article written without the mumbling sound caused by Apple's dick being firmly lodged in their mouths. The entire article read like they were trying, really hard, to write an objective article but then phrases like "engineering marvel" and "the hardware spec itself is flawless (and peerless)" come out and credibility is lost especially when those exaggerated comments are in the neighborhood of descriptions telling about what isn't any better (and in many cases worse) than the competition.

      I think an objective article would have more of the following tone:

      "Apple's new Mac Book is the first laptop to integrate a retinal display and standard USB 3.0. They also include a massive battery to keep the battery life high, 7 hours, in the face of the higher power drain of the screen. The balance of the components are on par with competing laptops or in some cases slower presumably continuing in their aim to keep battery life high. Apple also continues their black-box philosophy having no user-serviceable parts within the shiny package."

      Fluff that out to make an article long enough for an editor and I'd be screaming less fanboi at this PR-grade article.

    6. Re:Did I miss something? by flyingsquid · · Score: 2
      I know it's all trendy to hate on Apple these days, but this is a pretty impressive piece of engineering. They've managed to increase the screen resolution, decrease the weight of the computer, and give the thing a 7-hour battery life, and keep it reasonably affordable. And some of the design decisions- getting rid of the DVD drive, moving to flash storage instead of a hard disk drive- say a lot about where Apple sees laptops heading. Although the MacBook Air already made that leap, this is the first time we've seen these things in a laptop that isn't designed as an ultraportable.

      It's true that this is more an evolutionary piece of technology than a revolutionary one. It's using existing technology (retina display) and design approaches (dropping the DVD and HDD) we've seen in other devices (iPad, iPhone, MacBook Air). But that doesn't mean it's not an impressive piece of engineering. You could make the same argument about the Boeing 777. At first glance, it's not all that different from the first jetliner that flew in 1949, but the details are different- subtle refinements to the wing sections, carbon fiber materials, different manufacturing processes, major upgrades to the electronics. The end result is a plane that carries a lot of people a very long distance, very efficiently. Ditto for a technology like the bicycle. A modern road bike looks fundamentally a lot like a 10-speed from 50 years ago, but major advances in manufacturing and materials (carbon fiber, plastic, and aluminum) mean that you're getting better performance with a far lighter bike.

      This kind of engineering- refining an existing technology to get better characteristics like weight while improving performance, all while keeping costs down- is really, really tough. If it was easy, everybody would be making something like the new Macbook or the 777. It doesn't have the same glamor as inventing something wholly new, like the lightbulb or the helicopter, for example, but it's really a vital part of engineering, and ultimately it's what enables radical new technologies. Years of pushing down the size of components while increasing their power made smartphones and tablet computers possible. Years of pushing down the size of engines while increasing their power made aircraft possible. And so on.

      Bottom line- maybe you don't like Apple machines, or the software, or the company. But the guys who put this thing together have to be some of the best engineers in the business.

    7. Re:Did I miss something? by nathan+s · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Slightly off-topic, but if you've ever tried to get a writing job for a tech blog/article site, they are running a business and will tell you straight up that what they want are articles that drive eyeballs to the site so that they can sell advertising and get paid. Your take is far too objective to be attention-grabbing.:)

      (I briefly looked into writing for some of these types of sites and decided that this type -- more copywriting than analysis -- is not for me. Some people don't mind using screaming hyperbole and writing endless "List of N things..." articles, but it makes my skin crawl as a reader, so I can't bring myself to write it.)

    8. Re:Did I miss something? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      For someone who has managed to be quite productive on 1440x768 or similar resolutions for the last several years, trying to convince me that somehow 2880xwhatever is somehow a necessity worth 6x what I paid for my current work laptop is a bit much to take.

      Its impressive, but its also wildly expensive, and it astounds me that people would try to justify pricetag and slightly worse specs (graphics, non-upgradeable RAM / SSD) simply because the display is impressive.

    9. Re:Did I miss something? by SydShamino · · Score: 2

      Isn't everything ever made built from current or prior generations of components? How would one build something today made by components not themselves built until next year?

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    10. Re:Did I miss something? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Because it has a shiny fruit (or vagina) on the back of it.... duh.

      FTFY.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Did I miss something? by thogard · · Score: 1

      The company who made the screen increased the screen resolution. Apple just bought the new display and dropped it in their box and filled it so it may not break. The rest is where the netbooks were headed if they had the price point.

      This thing is just the next step... It's not impressive engineering. Its what the engineering department is supposed to be doing every day.

    12. Re:Did I miss something? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      And check out the massive caveat about the screen on page 2. The desktop and most apps are actually upscaled.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    13. Re:Did I miss something? by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to the screen, or other components?

    14. Re:Did I miss something? by needsomemoola · · Score: 1

      I think the "engineering marvel" isn't about the generation of components, but the form factor, design, and quality of the hardware. Are there any other laptops out there with specs like this? The quality of the display alone (pixel density, contrast, thinness) is unique among what's available. I wouldn't call it a marvel by far, but I would have to say that this looks like the best spec laptop out there now. Far too expensive for some poor IT guy like me, but I'm sure a lot of rich people will buy it and under-appreciate it's capabilities just the right amount.

      --
      "That'll never compile."
    15. Re:Did I miss something? by wfolta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Perhaps if you also added, "No other competitor offers this combination of features in this small a package. Most compact competitors do not offer discrete graphics, nor quad-core CPUs. No laptop of any kind offers a retinal display for any price. Most competitors are only beginning to offer Intel's Thunderbolt connectivity. Apple continues to design systems, while their competitors throw components together."

    16. Re:Did I miss something? by busyqth · · Score: 2

      The company who made the screen increased the screen resolution. Apple just bought the new display and dropped it in their box and filled it so it may not break.

      So, if Apple weren't around this same screen would be available in some other computer this week?
      Or, did Apple maybe drive the production of this panel by, for example, investing in research, investing in production lines, signing contracts for the purchase of large numbers of panels, or actually paying for large numbers of panels up front, etc.

    17. Re:Did I miss something? by wfolta · · Score: 1

      We're talking about the latest MacBooks here. Please be specific as to which of the "most are previous generation" parts you are referring to. Some of them have appeared previously in other brands, but they're not "previous generation".

      (Perhaps you're making the point that MacBooks are not always on the latest generation, which has been true in the past. I don't see it this time, though.)

    18. Re:Did I miss something? by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      It should be considered that if "It remove 80 percent of human solid waste."

    19. Re:Did I miss something? by Grudge2012 · · Score: 1

      Sales engineering. They did what any other company could've done with a laptop at a 2300 dollar price point. The marvel is apple social engineering their way into people's wallets.

      Errm. Sony VAIO 13.1" Z Series Laptop - $2999.99 "Amazing Full HD 1080p display"

  8. They will come by Quick+Reply · · Score: 1

    The 17" model has always lagged behind.

    When they can procure 17" 3840x2400 displays, the 17" will return.

  9. Nonsense! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    These shady ifixit characters are peddling pure propaganda. You can repair a damaged or non-functional macbook pro with just a few clicks!

    1. Re:Nonsense! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean Gestures surely? What kind of Apple Jedi are you with no hand waving skills?

  10. You aren't supposed to repair your Apple computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Just throw it away and buy a shiny, shiny new one! Or are you opposed to planned obsolescence? We have a few decades of resources left to consume before they run out, so don't worry!

  11. Re:no user-replaceable parts by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Informative

    While a wholly proprietary pinout(and a different wholly proprietary pinout than the last model's wholly proprietary pinout) the storage card is at least socketed... Given that there are likely to be a reasonable number of these sold, and to deep pocketed buyers, 3rd-party options will likely exist sooner or later. RAM, though, may leave you with a case of buyer's remorse...

  12. I thought so too, but... by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    The fact the current 17" model is no longer sold at all seems an indicator they might be dropping the model for a while.

    The new display has enough pixels to fit a retina iPad display within... as much as I like the larger space of the 17" laptop I think with the new screen I could shrink fonts down a bit and be OK with it.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  13. Re:no user-replaceable parts by cryptizard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I agree, it sucks pretty hard from a consumer standpoint but I can also see why it might have been (emphasis might) necessary in this case. That thing is crazy thin and if you look at the teardown they don't really have any room to mess around in there. Looks like they made it possible by taking all the things that used to be self contained (RAM, hard drive, etc.), pulling out their guts and soldering/plugging them directly onto the main board. Think about the space you save over having to include hard drive enclosures and sockets for the RAM. Again, not saying I like this, but I would sooner attribute it to a desire to make this thing as streamlined as possible rather than assuming they were trying to screw people over. In fact, the new non-retina Macbook Pros are still totally user replaceable.

  14. Who did it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who engineered it? Americans, Chinese or Koreans?

    1. Re:Who did it? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Apple generally do the design work in the US, and the manufacturing in China - but the components will have come from all over the world, as is standard with anything electronic.

  15. No, really 2880x1800 by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Informative

    What you are confused by is the scaling for elements (like images) that are not built for a hi-res display. All system text, and all of the applications that come with the Macbook have everything at the full resolution.

    Anything built for a high-res display can be displayed in pixel perfect accuracy.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:No, really 2880x1800 by Hatta · · Score: 1

      What does "built for a high res display" even mean? Programs are built for displays, the resolution of the display shouldn't matter. I can display an application built to display at 640x480 on my 1600x1200 CRT with no problems whatsoever. It's just small. The same thing should go for Apple's high res disply, or they've fucked something up terribly.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:No, really 2880x1800 by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      What does "built for a high res display" even mean?

      It probably means vector graphics (icons, etc.) fonts specified in picas or points or em's, etc. Funny thing is I sat in on a session on this at WWDC '98. High-res displays were "due out soon" then.

      I'm glad to see it hit the streets 14 years later. Glad I didn't hold my breath, though.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  16. Re:no user-replaceable parts by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

    With the ram surface mount soldered to the motherboard, that is unlikely...

  17. Heat by NoZart · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I read a few articles on the new shiny, but there seems to be no information on how the thermal and related noise situation is. How does the smaller design and needed computing power to drive that screen impact the temperature (under stress)?
    My old MBP already gets annoyingly hot and loud when i am doing stuff on it.

    1. Re:Heat by Necroman · · Score: 2

      they were just announced, it'll take a bit for review sites to dig into those sorts of details.

      Apple mentioned they worked on making the fans quieter, but I'd be interested to know the heat and noise level of the machines.

      --
      Its not what it is, its something else.
    2. Re:Heat by wfolta · · Score: 2

      Several reviews I've read say that the new model tends to run cooler. Apple also made a big deal of redesigned fans that don't have a single peak frequency, making them less annoying. They also made a big deal of the redesigned air flow as well. I believe that the automatic graphics switching will also decrease overall heat (if you tended to keep the GPU enabled even though you don't use it a lot).

  18. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by LocalH · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's how Apple does high DPI - it's basically a 2x mode. The idea is that programs not designed for a Retina display will still act like they're running on a 1440x900 display (and thus will be of a decent size on the screen) but programs with 2x assets will display with the increased sharpness. Non-Retina-aware programs still get some of the benefit in terms of font and UI rendering (as standard system widgets are always displayed at Retina resolution regardless of whether the app is Retina-aware). This is the same way that it works on the iPhone/iPod touch 4 and the iPad 3.

    This is where the fact that Apple chose to use unhinted fonts is a big win. Windows can't easily do high DPI because many programs are not designed for it, font spacing will be way off in some programs because Microsoft chooses to hammer fonts to the pixel grid.

    --
    FC Closer
  19. This is the problem I have.... by BigDaveyL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I'm going to pay a premium for a laptop, I'd like to be able to upgrade the RAM and HDD. Or even replace the battery. Many users simply can't afford to buy the new model every year.

    If this was an engineering marvel, Apple would have allowed users to do upgrades.

    1. Re:This is the problem I have.... by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Many users simply can't afford to buy the new model every year.

      But many can, and those are Apple customers.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    2. Re:This is the problem I have.... by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 2

      If I'm going to pay a premium for a laptop, I'd like to be able to upgrade the RAM and HDD. Or even replace the battery. Many users simply can't afford to buy the new model every year.

      You want a T series Thinkpad (Maybe W and X is also similar)

    3. Re:This is the problem I have.... by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      Every year? No that's phones. Every 3-5 years perhaps for Apple laptops.

    4. Re:This is the problem I have.... by hawguy · · Score: 2

      If I'm going to pay a premium for a laptop, I'd like to be able to upgrade the RAM and HDD. Or even replace the battery. Many users simply can't afford to buy the new model every year.

      You want a T series Thinkpad (Maybe W and X is also similar)

      I second that - I wanted something solidly built and long lived, so my previous laptop was a T20, I kept that one for 5 years before replacing it with a T520. I picked up a cheap used X60 for travel - I've dropped it more times than I can count and it's still working fine.

    5. Re:This is the problem I have.... by je+ne+sais+quoi · · Score: 1

      You know, I figured something out several years ago now: instead of upgrading the computer with a bigger hard drive/RAM/video card whatever some years down the line, I just "upgrade" those things when I buy the computer in the first place. So, instead of buying 1 Gb of ram, I buy 4 Gb. Granted, you do have to pay more money up front this way, but it means I also get an up-to-date machine that degrades to a not so up-to-date machine over time, instead of having a not so up-to-date machine, which becomes out-of-date machine, followed by a not so up-to-date machine again later down the road. See the difference? In one case you're ahead of the pace, in another at the pace or behind it. I'm guessing you don't save much money doing the upgrade path either because you have to buy two sets of components. Is buying the extra RAM or whatever more than twice as expensive? Usually not. I will grant you that sometimes one fails to anticipate what the requirements of the machine are going to be for the next five years or so, but that's the buyer's fault for not buying a machine that will suit their needs. It does happen, but on the odd chance, you can still upgrade things on mac laptops, I know, I've replaced two logic boards, hard drives and batteries on various old mac pro laptops over the years, but that's mostly for fun rather than for need. By the time I need to replace the components, the laptop is so old it's not worth upgrading.

      --
      Gentlemen! You can't fight in here, this is the war room!
    6. Re:This is the problem I have.... by rsborg · · Score: 1

      Many users simply can't afford to buy the new model every year.

      But many can, and those are Apple customers.

      It can be made affordable by selling your existing previous-year machine to folks who really can't afford to trade-up every year...Those who may not be able to do that, they can get by quite well by buying a year or two old sturdy laptop (unibody macbooks are quite sturdy) at a significant discount and keeping it for a couple of years. A 2008 unibody Macbook will still run the latest (unreleased) OSX version well.

      In the windows world, this economics doesn't make as much sense due to the quick obsolescence of hardware, but in the Mac world, it's quite doable.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    7. Re:This is the problem I have.... by DogDude · · Score: 1

      In the windows world, this economics doesn't make as much sense due to the quick obsolescence of hardware, but in the Mac world, it's quite doable

      You have that backwards. I'm writing this on a 2002 laptop that works just fine and is 100% supported by MS's current OS's. You must've been buying Apple stuff for a while to think that 4 years is a long time to continue to use hardware.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    8. Re:This is the problem I have.... by adolf · · Score: 1

      What other phone has been/will be supported as long? I don't think there is one.

      The Motorola DPC-550 was supported from the early 90s, until the big carriers turned off AMPS sometime a few years ago.

      And this speaks nothing of the Western Electric Model 500, first released in 1949, distributed until 1984, and still supported today.

  20. Re:no user-replaceable parts by jeffmeden · · Score: 1, Interesting

    While a wholly proprietary pinout(and a different wholly proprietary pinout than the last model's wholly proprietary pinout) the storage card is at least socketed... Given that there are likely to be a reasonable number of these sold, and to deep pocketed buyers, 3rd-party options will likely exist sooner or later. RAM, though, may leave you with a case of buyer's remorse...

    Easy, just buy the largest option. Apple is doing one thing smart here, they are making a design that if produced by the tens of millions (which these will surely be) will prove to be VERY cheap. That means you can probably buy the upgraded ram for what the same version would have cost you with a modular ram socket but no upgrade in place. Comparing these notebooks to other similar competitors will probably put Apple on a footing closer than they were in the past. The question is, at what price does giving up choice come at? Clearly Apple is OK with removing choice (as seen in all other product lines) in favor of a cost-competitive set of options that "you want". Why should they not take their laptops to the same model?

  21. Re:no user-replaceable parts by alen · · Score: 1, Insightful

    unless you're a digital hoarder who feels the need to keep more music and TV/movies than any reasonable person can watch in a lifetime hard drives are large enough. worst case i can buy an external drive to archive photos/videos of my kids.

    most people don't have mental/OCD issues where they will have to see some photo from years ago right away

  22. Re:no user-replaceable parts by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most laptops require a screwdriver to replace the hard drive. This one is no different. Except that in this case, the "hard drive" is a chip, third party versions of which will undoubtedly be available soon, just like the were for the Air.

    RAM soldered to the motherboard is disappointing, although looking at how things are crammed in, I'm not really surprised. iFixit's point that it's "the first MacBook Pro that will be unable to adapt to future advances in memory and storage technology" is incorrect - Intel laptop motherboards have almost always been limited to memory that existed when they were sold, and you CAN upgrade the storage.

  23. Wrong, semi-matte by default by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Informative

    No matte option, only glossy

    The new screen has a much different front, they said in the marketing materials 60-70% less reflective than the older glossy models. It's why there's no matte option this time around (I have a matte screen currently and wouldn't go for a glossy option again either).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Wrong, semi-matte by default by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      His point was 'look before you judge'.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Wrong, semi-matte by default by hawguy · · Score: 2

      No matte option, only glossy

      The new screen has a much different front, they said in the marketing materials 60-70% less reflective than the older glossy models. It's why there's no matte option this time around (I have a matte screen currently and wouldn't go for a glossy option again either).

      Wouldn't the diffusion of a matte screen partially obscure the tiny higher resolution pixels?

    3. Re:Wrong, semi-matte by default by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't the diffusion of a matte screen partially obscure the tiny higher resolution pixels?

      It's generally a coating on the front that only diffuses reflected light from the outside, anything from the display is fine (does not affect sharpness).

      What it does do though is slightly lower brightness (since it is something between you and the display). Since the new retina screen is somewhat less bright than the current LCD's, that may also be why they do not want to put any other coatings in front... outdoors I have found brightness of a display helps more than a matte coating, the matte coating is more useful in combating interior lights and windows.

      But like I said, the new display seems "matte enough".

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. SSD storage? by Geeky · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think the big turnoff for me is that they only have flash storage

    The limited writes are likely to be a factor for some uses, surely? I certainly wouldn't want to be using one as a development machine, or for serious photography (my other main computer use).

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    1. Re:SSD storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't use a machine without an SSD. Who wants a slow-moving operating system, when they could have their computer instantly respond to commands?

      I'll take predictable failure from write limits over the instant complete failure of hard drives any day.

    2. Re:SSD storage? by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 2

      While limited writes are certainly a factor, they probably aren't going to be a major issue for basic consumer use.

      Most SSD storage drivers these days automatically spread the writes around the drive, so to hit the write limit you will need to write the equivalent of the capacity of the drive multiplied by the write limit of any particular register. Assuming 2 million write cycles per register, and the low-end 256 GB drive, that's 500,000 TB of writing before you burn out every register. Obviously the user would see some degradation before that, but there's still lots of room to play with.

      Some more sample calculations are available here: http://www.storagesearch.com/ssdmyths-endurance.html

    3. Re:SSD storage? by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Both is one thing - SSD for the OS and program files that won't change often, traditional drive for data - but not just SSD for some uses. Sure, if you're mainly browsing the web it's probably fine (although I'd hope that something sensible was done with the cache - maybe storing it in memory until you close the browser, to minimise writes).

      As I say, though, for dev work where you might be compiling software, you're going to be hitting the write limit well within the expected lifetime of the laptop.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    4. Re:SSD storage? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I tend to hit hard drive limits well within the expected lifetime of my laptop. As in, there's a half decent chance the drive will die completely. As the other poster said, write limits aren't so bad because the failure is predictable, and wear levelling is pretty good at evening things out. Compiling isn't bad at all, and neither is photography - the amount of data that is changed and needs to be rewritten is small.

    5. Re:SSD storage? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      What kind of a factor that's going to affect development or photography?

      The limited number of writes isn't going to cause corruption. It's just that after a long time - years - the capacity will start to decline, as some cells aren't writable any more.

      And in any case, regardless of drive technology you are making backups are you not? Any disk technology could suffer complete failure.

    6. Re:SSD storage? by hawguy · · Score: 2

      I wouldn't use a machine without an SSD. Who wants a slow-moving operating system, when they could have their computer instantly respond to commands?

      I'll take predictable failure from write limits over the instant complete failure of hard drives any day.

      I put an SSD in my laptop and didn't notice much difference aside from faster boot times. For normal office use it seemed about the same as before the SSD (but with less capacity so I had to move much of my media to a USB hard drive.

      I ended up putting the hard drive back into the laptop and moved the SSD to my desktop where I do more I/O intensive work like compiling software. I definitely notice the difference there and since I kept the 2TB drive, I have the best of both worlds - a small fast SSD for I/O intensive tasks, and a big hard drive for more storage.

    7. Re:SSD storage? by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Good points, Ian, Basil, hawguy. I guess I had a - perhaps outdated - view that any use that involved frequent writes was likely to be a problem (e.g. compiling, which may write a lot of intermediate files and constantly change output files, or anything that writes significant log files)

      Sounds like I might be wrong in that thinking, and need to do more research (you'll forgive me for not taking on face value anything I read on Slashdot, I hope!?)

      I guess, though, that the extra RAM - 8GB as standard - is to pretty much guarantee that it won't need to swap (something else I thought was a bit of a no-no for SSDs). Maybe there's also room there to mount /tmp in memory, if it isn't anyway.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    8. Re:SSD storage? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      The problem with your statement is that SSDs suffer from instant death too. My Intel 310 80 GB w/ 8MB bug bears witness.

      --
      Good-bye
    9. Re:SSD storage? by fa2k · · Score: 1

      Wearout isn't a concern for almost any normal use. If you copy big video files to it many times every day for editing, and run transformations on them, youd only run up about 100 GB every day, i.e. 1 write cycle on average (nicely distributed because of wear-levelling). An SSD can handle 100,000 write cycles, so you're good for 273 years or so.

      Space is a bigger concern, as many "pro" tasks require lots of storage (though many don't, but for professional writers etc, there's little point in even getting the higher-spec pro laptops). The fact that it's a laptop indicates that it's meant to be portable, so the data must also be portable. Apple make a super-thin laptop, but they require you to carry a hard-drive and an ethernet dongle.. That's not elegant design! At least they have a HDMI port now, so you can get by without a display dongle.

    10. Re:SSD storage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Common flash has nothing like a 2M write cycle limit. More like 50K for the older stuff, as little as 3K for the newer. This guy is talking about hand-selecting the chips, building a custom drive system from those raw chips, and writing his own drivers for a very undemanding and fault-tolerant application that he puffs up to seem like it's something fabulous.

      Actual writes before failure have been tested to be about 200-1000TB for a 64GB 25nm disk, which is about 3000-15000 complete writes, or a few weeks of maximum use. (and bigger disks are not necessarily better.) Yes, it's not a limitation for most people, but the drives sometimes fail early and become totally inaccessible and unrecoverable.

    11. Re:SSD storage? by fa2k · · Score: 1

      OMG there's a 750 GB version, that's crazy. Strike my comment about drive space. (I thought SSDs were still at 128 and 256)

    12. Re:SSD storage? by fa2k · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification, 100k was all I found on Google. With 3K I suppose it could get a bit tight when using it as a scratch disk for video editing (for example). "A few weeks of maximum use" really says it all.

  25. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

    I was reading about the display on AnandTech, but one thing I don't get is what the actual resolution of the retina display is. From what I can tell, the images are rendered at 2880x1800, but can't actually be displayed at that size with pixel-perfect accuracy. Text cannot be read on higher resolutions without increasing the font size, which I thought was the whole point of having a higher resolution.

    It seems to make sense, they will either have an option where you can get the display to act like it's 2880x1800 (and everything will be super fucking small like you are saying) or you can have the display scaled to a slighly more normal 1900x1200 aka 1080p-like but at the cost of having the GPU do some upscaling so that all the apps still pump out a lower number of pixels, but the screen gets all the pixels it needs thanks to what is probably a pretty well thought out smoothing algorithm. And as the screenshot suggests, this is probably what murders the performance and/or battery life on the unit since you basically need to have a high power GPU running all the time to keep up with that process.

  26. It's beautiful. by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

    I wonder why the fans are enclosed in plastic shrouds? http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/macbook-pro-retina-display-innards-labelled.jpg

    "The battery has a capacity of 95 watt-hours, some 20% larger than 77.5 watt-hour battery in the non-Retina MacBook Pro. As far as I know, this is the largest built-in laptop battery ever produced â" and yet the new MBP "only" has a battery life of seven hours."

    It's amazing how many hours laptop makers can squeeze out of batteries. This may be the largest battery ever produced, but would still only power my reading light (40 watt bulb) for 2 and 1/3 hours...... they ought to put some of that technology into a desktop to make it low-power (and green).

    "If you run out of flash storage (and 256GB isnâ(TM)t a whole lot), your only option is expensive external storage. "

    Only? Sounds like a lot to me. And external storage isn't expensive... $70 for a 500GB and $90 for a 1000GB drive.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:It's beautiful. by vlm · · Score: 2

      And external storage isn't expensive... $70 for a 500GB and $90 for a 1000GB drive.

      The only measure of a laptop is its thinness, and you're not going to find a 1/16th inch thick 1 TB drive anywhere soon. So you've gotta make a flash card RAID array out of about forty 32 gig SD cards and a zillion USB hubs and cables and adapters. The price is gonna add up.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:It's beautiful. by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      This may be the largest battery ever produced, but would still only power my reading light (40 watt bulb) for 2 and 1/3 hours...... they ought to put some of that technology into a desktop to make it low-power (and green).

      The largest "embedded" battery ever; plenty of other laptops with snap-in batteries offer larger options. And if your reading light were LED powered and not basically a heater that managed to throw off a little bit of light, it would last for days (a 40w equivalent LED would draw 4w or less).

    3. Re:It's beautiful. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I wonder why the fans are enclosed in plastic shrouds?

      Because the entire purpose of the fans is to cool off the CPU and GPU, and creating that sort of wind tunnel turned out to be an efficient way to do it. The RAM, flash memory, and other components don't need cooling, so if you had the fan blowing all over them it would be a waste of wind.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:It's beautiful. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And external storage isn't expensive... $70 for a 500GB and $90 for a 1000GB drive.

      The only measure of a laptop is its thinness, and you're not going to find a 1/16th inch thick 1 TB drive anywhere soon.

      I usually solve this problem by not putting my external storage in my laptop. It's a trick I learned somewhere...

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:It's beautiful. by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      I wonder why the fans are enclosed in plastic shrouds? http://www.extremetech.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/macbook-pro-retina-display-innards-labelled.jpg

      I think it's because, like most laptops Apple has made recently, they're blowers. A long time ago (like 2001 or 2002), they used a traditional fan, where air comes in one side and goes straight through out the other - to fit it, they angled it at 30 degrees or so inside the laptop. Since then, they've mostly been using blowers, where air comes in at the center of one side, but is then blown out at a 90-degree angle, off the ends of the blades. They make these much larger, which lets them run at lower RPMs while moving the same amount of air, meaning they're quieter and sound less like a mosquito. The plastic shroud keeps the air from blowing out in all directions, and directs it out the back of the computer.

      It looks like the airflow in there is designed to enter near the battery (you can see ducts on what I believe are the speakers), cruise over the logic board, enter at the exposed center part of the blowers, and exit out the back on the sides, through some heat sink fins connected to a heat pipe that goes over the CPU and GPU. Some air also enters through the middle back, to go over the top of the RAM.

    6. Re:It's beautiful. by vlm · · Score: 1

      Ah but it has to match the laptop for styling purposes. Otherwise its visually unstylish like 500 pound dude with 100 pound wife, or 7 foot tall wife with 5 foot tall husband, etc. Clashing styles are not going to appeal to the "deep as a rain puddle" demographic.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:It's beautiful. by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      I've tried CFLs but they rapidly burn-out (due to enclosed lamps killing the electronics). I suspect the same would happen with LEDs. So rather than blow ~$20 per bulb, I just keep using the cheap incandescents. (Besides 40 watt isn't that much power anyway..... not compared to my 10,000 watt A/C or heat pump.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    8. Re:It's beautiful. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That's what time capsule is for.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  27. thin? why does anyone care? by vlm · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why should the only measure of a laptop be its thinness?

    I want a laptop that's light, cool (thermally), powerful, reliable, cheap, good A/V and silent. Thinness is at least 8th on my priority list. Make it 4 inches thick as long as it maxes out the 7 higher priority goals first.

    Why is there is fixation on thin laptops? What do you "get" out of a laptop being 1/2 inch thinner than another laptop?

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:thin? why does anyone care? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      Because for 99% of use cases all notebooks are powerful reliable and cheap these days. The competition is in the thickness.

    2. Re:thin? why does anyone care? by boristdog · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that a thin, light laptop is amazingly easy to tote around.

      But you can get laptops pretty much as thin and light as this already from other vendors for a whole lot less money. My 13" Dell Vostro is 0.67" thin, weighs under 4 lbs and cost me all of $350, brand new.

    3. Re:thin? why does anyone care? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Thin laptops are sexy and hip.

      Ftter ones are for 'nerds'.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:thin? why does anyone care? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I want a laptop that's light, cool (thermally), powerful, reliable, cheap, good A/V and silent.

      You're asking for the moon.

    5. Re:thin? why does anyone care? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Is it worth doubling the pricetag for 1/2" thinner? Because thats basically what we're looking at here.

    6. Re:thin? why does anyone care? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      No, they're doubling the price for a thinner casing, better display, lower-powered-RAM, and a solid state hard drive.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:thin? why does anyone care? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      The amount of power that RAM consumes is so small that it is basically irrelevant when considering the battery life of a laptop. The solid state drive is nice, as are the other features, but lets not pretend they warrant that pricetag (unless resolution and width are truly the deciding factor for you).

    8. Re:thin? why does anyone care? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      The low power ram accounts for 17% of the battery life.

      Why wouldn't we pretend the SSD, thickness, and screen aren't valuable? They're all factors of the price! Or do you mean that you personally don't care?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  28. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you run with XP style scaling, yes (which is the default and what all sites I've seen actually demonstrate, they always forget to change the setting). But not with Vista style scaling, in which case non-DPI apps will also employ pixel doubling, if DPI is set to 200%.
    W8 has a preset option for this (W7 this must be done manually).

  29. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by vux984 · · Score: 2

    font spacing will be way off in some programs because Microsoft chooses to hammer fonts to the pixel grid.

    I'd thought cleartype and the font system in Vista and later had gotten a lot better. I'd thought the reason Windows can't do high DPI well was more related to things like toolbar icon assets etc.

  30. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's 2880x1800. Your confusion stems from Lion's text and OS UI element handling, which basically gives you choices about how big you want text and UI elements to appear. It looks like you can specify a kind of effective resolution, telling Lion to fool all the old software that doesn't know about high dpi screens into not rendering things too small to see.

    OpenGL and the Cocoa drawing APIs have full access to high resolution screen.

  31. What do you mean not replaceable? by shadowrat · · Score: 1

    It looks 100% user replaceable to me. Replace it with a whole new computer!

  32. No, really more like 1440x900 by _xeno_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, not really 2880x1800. Make no mistake, this is not a 2880x1800 display, at least in the sense that most people would think. It's effectively a 1440x900 display, where each pixel is actually four.

    By which I mean that if you currently can fit 40 lines of code in a single editor window on your existing 1440x900 display, on this new 2880x1800 "retina" display, you will be able to fit those same 40 lines of code, just with extra clarity.

    Now don't get me wrong, the increase in pixel density is a good thing, but calling it a "2880x1800" is incredibly misleading (albeit technically accurate). You won't fit any more actual data, the same data you can currently fit will just have a higher resolution.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    1. Re:No, really more like 1440x900 by DurendalMac · · Score: 1

      You can fit more actual data if the software is built for it. For example, FCPX is now built for it, so you'll probably be getting real 1080p resolution out of that video without filling the whole screen.

    2. Re:No, really more like 1440x900 by Qzukk · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Looking at the Anandtech article you linked, it looks like they restrict OSX from choosing 2880x1800 because system elements aren't designed to be seen at that resolution. Games run at 2880x1800 just fine, you just have to squint to see the text (in the portal 2 screenshot) because they didn't design the text to scale in a DPI-aware manner. Letters that are 10 pixels tall are still 10 pixels tall even when those 10 pixels are half of the height as on a normal ~100dpi screen.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:No, really more like 1440x900 by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are wrong. It's a 2880x1800 display. You can address each and every one of those pixels individually.

      If your code editor uses Lion's text rendering APIs but is not aware that the display is high DPI, Lion will lie to it and tell it that it's on a lower resolution screen so the text isn't ridiculously small. If your code editor IS aware that it's on a high DPI screen, it can display the text as small as your tired eyes wish.

    4. Re:No, really more like 1440x900 by illogic · · Score: 1

      Actually it can lie all the way up to 1920x1200, the resolution of the 17" MBP or my 24" iMac.

      If your code editor uses Lion's text rendering APIs but is not aware that the display is high DPI, Lion will lie to it and tell it that it's on a lower resolution screen so the text isn't ridiculously small.

  33. Didn't ViewSonic have a 22" 200ppi display... by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 2

    ... like 10 years ago? Well, hopefully since apple stuck their logo on it, high ppi displays will be the next big thing. It managed to convince people that tablets aren't the totally useless toys they are. Maybe it will do the same for something that's actually useful.

    1. Re:Didn't ViewSonic have a 22" 200ppi display... by jimicus · · Score: 2

      Probably; back before widescreen displays were all the rage there was a whole brace of screen sizes and resolutions available.

    2. Re:Didn't ViewSonic have a 22" 200ppi display... by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      People don't like paying a lot more for things when they can't really see or hear the difference. Audiophiles and mac fans may be exceptions.

    3. Re:Didn't ViewSonic have a 22" 200ppi display... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      IBM did. I used one, and it was great. It was also $10,000. Oddly enough, there turns out not to be a big market for displays that cost $10K, and once both people in that market had bought them they stopped producing them.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  34. Storage may be replaceable by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    In the comments someone noted that the built-in storage appeared to have the same connector as the Macbook Air, which would mean you could replace the storage.

    The RAM seems soldiered in though.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  35. Re:Repairability Manufacturability by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    needing a "magic screwdriver" to open X just means that in a couple months your local electronics Shoppe will have some thing new to sell you.

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  36. Re:no user-replaceable parts by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

    Ask customers of Acer about being seperated from their money.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  37. Gimme a break by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1, Funny

    I can remember a day when geeks would have been hopping-mad about a computer which comes with a feature to "forget about replacing or upgrading any component". Apple seems to exist for the sole purpose of seeing how much abuse it can inflict on it's user base - and the userbase seem to love them for it. Very odd.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:Gimme a break by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Typical masochist / sadist relationship.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    2. Re:Gimme a break by FitForTheSun · · Score: 1

      I can remember that day, too, because that day is today. For more on how geeks feel about this laptop, you need look no farther than the "hopping-mad" comments right here in this forum, the same one you posted in.

  38. Dont buy apple for the hardware... by firesyde424 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    FFS, buy Apple because you like OSX or you like using software made for OSX. I will even go so far as to say, buy it because you like the look and feel of a Mac. Don't buy a Mac because you think it has great hardware. If that is your reason for buying a Mac, go buy a PC and turn it into a Hackintosh, it's much cheaper.

    A 15inch MacBook Pro has Core i7-3720QM CPU(2.6 Ghz boost to 3.6Ghz, 8 GB DDR3 RAM(1600 Mhz), 750 GB 5400 RPM SATA Hard Drive, and a Geforce 650M with 1 GB of dedicated RAM for $2200. I can get an Alienware M14x with the exact same CPU, exact same size and speed of RAM, same size but FASTER hard drive(they don't offer a 5400 RPM option), and the exact same video card but with twice the video ram, for $650 less than the Mac.

    Let me put it another way. If I add $49 to the price of the Mac and spend it on the Alienware, I can get the next fastest CPU, max the RAM at 16GB, and add a 256 GB SSD!

    1. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ".. it's much cheaper."
      Style has value.
      Macs have a very high resale rate, BTW.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by firesyde424 · · Score: 1

      ".. it's much cheaper."
      Style has value.
      Macs have a very high resale rate, BTW.

      Which tells me that people who own Mac's either don't like their Mac well enough to hold on to it, or have enough money to buy a new one every year or so.

    3. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by mikael_j · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Alienware M14x has a 14" 1600x900 monitor (I assume TN). It's 1.71" thick, It weighs 6.45 lbs. I can only assume you're the stereotypical "all that matters is performance per dollar" type who will not be swayed by any argument...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    4. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by jittles · · Score: 1

      WEll, to be fair, the Mac w/ Retina display does come with an SSD. So the $50 would only be applied towards the cost of the RAM and the CPU.

    5. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by ratbag · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All right, I'll bite.

      M14x has a 14" display, not 15".
      Its battery lasts around 4 hours in standardised tests, not 7 hours.

      Yes it's cheaper, but you're not comparing like with like. Also, at the risk of facing derision from the tough (blinkered?) Slashdot crowd, just look at the thing http://www.notebookreview.com/shared/picture.asp?f=61197. When I'm choosing where to spend my disposable income, two of the factors are how the thing looks and feels, as you suggest. Not the most important factors, but definitely on the list.

      I've ordered a 2.6GHz Retina machine, with 16GB RAM, plus the Ethernet dongle and the MagSafe2 adapter. Other than one very old Compaq laptop at a previous employer, I have never felt the urge to upgrade RAM or storage in one of my machines so I couldn't care less about the lack of upgradeability. The battery can be replaced by Apple if that's an issue (I've taken advantage of that with one previous machine). It will be used, like all of my machines for: coding (Vim/Netbeans), system management (Solaris, Linux, MacOS, Windows servers, Cisco and HP network equipment), photography and film (LightRoom, Photoshop and Final Cut Pro X). It replaces a MacBook Air which has served me well, travelling around the world with me, tucked into a Tenba Roadie II Universal case. The MacBook Air shuffles over to my wife, to replace her 1st gen MBP15 which I'll donate to whichever friend or family member needs it most at the moment.

      Yep, I'm in a happy Apple bubble. I like the simplicity, style, look, feel and quality of Macs. I love the functionality of OSX. And I certainly don't fit into the moronic image that other replies have alluded to (Starbucks, hipster etc.). I'm a systems and networks guy for a hedge fund, working from home, and the Mac hardware has been the right hardware for me and my job for many years now. I may not get 730fps on Diablo III, but I do have reliable, sturdy, smart and well-designed computers that do the job for me.

      Your mileage obviously varies, your criteria for computer selection differs from mine and I can respect that. But I do buy a Mac because of the hardware - that Retina screen is a hell of piece of kit and for photos/film it was enough to get me to order on day one. Similarly, the MacBook Air had exactly the right mix of performance and portability.

    6. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      "Look and feel" is part of the hardware, especially in this case where they needed a ton of custom parts to fit it in that case.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, just keep drinking the apple flavored cool-aid.

    8. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by ratbag · · Score: 1

      On price grounds? On "I'll leave it behind grounds"? On "it's so big grounds"?

      Intrigued and confused that you'd choose to deny yourself access to a fantastic machine for what I see as non-issues.

      Price? 30 dollars or thereabouts. Not free then, but in the greater scheme of things not really all that much.

      Leave it behind? I've never forgotten my USB-Ethernet dongle for the MBA when I've gone anywhere. In the same way I always remember the power supply and my house keys. Now, it's simple for me, since I just leave the dongle in my tool box which I take with me on site visits. Maybe you have a more hectic schedule where you don't know whether you're going to need to plug in.

      Size? Pocketable or easily goes in the case with the computer.

      So what is it that particularly offends you about the dongle? When I saw that a FW800 dongle was going to be available it was actually a selling feature to me, since I had missed it on the MBA. But I was happy with the size and weight of the MBA, and that was only possible because the case didn't have the funny-sized sockets. Compromise, pragmatism etc. - makes the world a smoother, more enjoyable place. I've enjoyed owning the MacBook Air and my wife will get the benefit of it now when I pass it to her after the MBPR arrives.

    9. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by wfolta · · Score: 1

      The Alienware M14x only has Bluetooth 3, has 20% less battery life, is 50% thicker, weighs 20% more, and has a smaller screen (14" versus 15.4"). It has a few more built-in ports (plenty of room in the larger and heavier body). No mystery that it would be less expensive.

      Let me put it another way, for the same price as your $49-more Alienware, I can get a 29880x1800 resolution display, en enclosure that's half as thick as the Alienware, longer battery life, and the same SSD capacity (though probably faster transfer speed). Yes, I only get 8 GB of RAM for that, but for $29 of the $49 more I can get an Ethernet adapter. Oh, your Alienware also has a higher-rez webcam. Woot!

    10. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1

      just look at the thing http://www.notebookreview.com/shared/picture.asp?f=61197.

      Typically I'm not a form over function type of guy, but looking at that thing I just threw up a little bit in my mouth.

    11. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by MrSenile · · Score: 1

      Ok, I'll bite, too.

      Personally, I'd not have used an Alienware as a comparison as for laptops (intel), they tend to be overpriced as well.

      I'd have gone Sager.

      NP9170, base price $1499.
      1920x1080 17" screen
      Nvidia 670M GTX
      i7-3610QM quad core
      8G DDR3 1600MHz (upgrade to 16G for $80 more)
      500G 7200 RPM drive (upgradeable to SSD + RAID 0/1) [500G raid-1 would be an additional $100]

      Sure, battery life is 2 hours under max load, but if you put it in 'business mode' which means not sitting there playing call of duty or watching your favorite videos, you can get upwards to 4-5+ hours out of the battery.

      So with a system where I could replace any part (including the video card), add/remove memory or hard drives, or essentially tweak it to my pleasure, for better hardware than the Mac (minus the retina display ... arguably...) for $800 less? Including popping in a fresh charged battery whenever I want with minimal effort? [spare battery for $130] Yea, I think I'll steer away from Mac's, thanks though.

      Don't get me wrong, Mac's nice hardware, but it's overpriced nice hardware. If I watered down this laptop a bit, I could potentially get two of these for the same price as a Mac. I'd say that's overpriced.

    12. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by wfolta · · Score: 1

      People seem to go uniquely crazy when it comes to computers.

      Do they wear trashbags for clothing because it's cheap and water/stainproof, or do they buy attractive clothing for a lot more money? Do they shave their heads to save on haircuts or do they pay someone to cut it? Do they drive a crappy, rusted-out hulk of a car or do they buy something attractive that "feels good" to them? Do they use milk crates for furniture in a tent, or do they buy a nice house and nice furniture?

      Do they buy whatever movies and music they can get in the dollar bin, or do they get music and videos they actually enjoy? Do they... Well, you get the picture. In almost every area of their lives, style, appearance, "fit", "feel" all matter. But then they run into a computer that's more stylish (not gimmicky like Alienware's) and an OS that's more stylish (not gimmicky like Windows), and they rage against style, appearance, fit, feel, and anything except checkboxes on a spec sheet!

      It doesn't make any sense.

    13. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by ratbag · · Score: 1

      The bitten biter bites the bitten biter's biter.

      Your Sager machine has a very nice spec, but again we come down to criteria for choosing a machine. It ticks none of the boxes for me - I don't want a 17" machine since I have to regularly carry the machine on trains and planes and my MBP17 was too big for that; 4-5 hours in crippled mode is still not 7 hours; the thing is just as ugly as the Alienware, to my eyes; I have no interest in swapping out hardware or upgrading or what have you.

      The Mac hardware is nice and the price to me is right, otherwise I wouldn't buy it. I resisted the first-gen MBA since the balance of performance and price was wrong. 2nd-gen was spot-on. I've not gone for the 768GB SSD option or the 2.7Ghz processor on my MBPT since they're marginal upgrades and the price doesn't match their value. I've got multiple TB of RAID storage at my desk and my carry-around requirements have been met by the 250GB of my MBA. I will get a new device to act as the MBPR's TimeMachine volume, since I've now got the option of USB3.

      Horses for courses, as some people say. I wouldn't touch one of these gaming machines, but then I don't play games on my computers (PS3 and 3DS for that particular need) whereas maybe you and the ancestor poster do. First and foremost, in the current world, I'm a Mac user and the MBPR is the right tool for my purposes. Your "over-priced" is my "correct price for the blend of attributes it brings to me". Vive la difference, etc.

    14. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by tknd · · Score: 1

      Don't buy a Mac because you think it has great hardware. If that is your reason for buying a Mac, go buy a PC and turn it into a Hackintosh, it's much cheaper.

      I bought a Macbook Air because I liked the hardware. The OS was secondary. By now I've gotten used to OSX, it does the job. I'm not sure it makes me more efficient or anything. As a software person, I do find the unix base quite useful.

      With the Air and now this new Macbook Pro, Apple is hitting target markets that no one else has. My requirements were simple:

      • Must be extremely light (~2lbs or 1kg).
      • Must be thin enough (for me that is less than 1")
      • Must be powerful enough (i3 or i5 minimum, Intel Atom does not cut it)
      • Must be capable of SSD storage
      • Must be 11" screen size, no bigger, no smaller.
      • Must have a method of port expansion (usb2 hubs are not good enough).

      Given that, I did not buy the first or second iteration of Macbook Airs. I waited until last year's iteration which came with Thunderbolt and i5 CPUs. Prior to that, I can tried a few different PC alternatives. The first 10" Asus netbook, and later Acer 11" notebook with a slightly faster AMD processor. They were both extremely lacking though they were close in the form-factor department. The first computer to pretty much meet my requirements was the Macbook Air 11" with Thunderbolt.

      My use case is fairly simple. I needed a computer that is portable yet powerful enough to take with me. This makes it possible for me to bring my work with me and rid myself of all the extra computers that are totally unnecessary in my opinion. I shouldn't need a powerful desktop just to do software development. I don't play games anymore so I don't care about graphical performance. I do care about video acceleration so many netbooks fell flat in this area. The SSD is necessary for fast application startup and file access. You simply do not go back after using an SSD. Finally the 11" screen is both the minimum and maximum size I'm willing to deal with when traveling. It is both small enough to fit in a small backpack yet large enough to do work.

      The only things I desire for my Air right now are:

      • HiDPI screen
      • Thunderbolt dock

      If they could also manage to make the charger a little thinner, that would be a bonus.

      Other than that, when it comes to PCs there's always something amiss. Either they fumble with the key layout, the trackpad sucks in some way, or they have some kind of build-quality defect. My Air wasn't exactly perfect, but it did manage to get the key points correct. The keyboard is actually spot on (although OSX key bindings take some learning) and the trackpad is good. One thing that does suck about Macs is there's a limited selection of input devices or you need third party software to make it work right. My logitech G5 mouse is evidence of this where I had to use usb overdrive to make it work better.

      But it wasn't until Apple made the Airs until everyone else started to copy. I don't care about copies, I do care that other PC manufacturers couldn't figure this out fast enough. When netbooks came out they were happy to just keep making more colors and shinier netbooks. They never thought to put a serious effort into making something thin yet sturdy. They didn't bother to make the hardware fast enough. Most of them pretty much just competed on price. Now Apple's proven people wanted something like the Air, and only now will the other manufacturers follow. That's ridiculous.

      The Macbook Air is actually my second Mac. The first was the first generation of Intel Mac Minis. It was a good computer but I didn't see much of the point. It was still a time when things were underpowered and having a small desktop computer didn't have much general purpose. Your comment probably would have been applicable then. But these days the portability requirements are taking over. People are moving back to the city, they're on the go, they want a computer that can match that lifestyle. For that the Air is perfect.

    15. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by MrSenile · · Score: 1

      Granted, if you already have pretty much a Mac-house, then it would make sense for you to pay the extra to continue down that mainstream.

      While intel could be cheaper (and a FYI, Sager offers a 15" 2.6kg 1920x1280 offering for $820, with a GeForce 630M), even hacking Mac on it wouldn't make sense for you, as you probably already have various support contracts in place with Apple.

      I personally wouldn't do Mac for myself. While it actually does tick some boxes for me, the fact my house is entirely UNIX based (Solaris, HPUX, AIX, Linux and BSD), with a rare windows laptop floating around, it doesn't make money sense for me to go the route that works for you. And yes, I'm aware Mac is basically BSD under the hood, but again, the price doesn't makes sense for my own use and how my network is already configured.

      As you say, Vive la difference.

    16. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      I was with you all the way up to "for the hardware..."

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    17. Re:Dont buy apple for the hardware... by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      First you say that customer should by a Mac only because OS X or software available for OS X but not for hardware.
      Then you say that customer should just buy a hacintosh and install OS X on it if they want "better hardware".

      So actually you say no one should ever buy a Mac because OS X or Apple Hardware.

      You don't give any price for Apple hardware than what specs say. You don't actually think that the casing and design would have a worth to be paid more.

      Of course you can attach a spoon to fork but it does not mean you want to use it in daily purpose.

  39. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

    But is the RAM still in a socket? Or is is soldered onto the motherboard? If Apple really wants no user replaceable parts they can do that. Having the RAM soldered in is not new. Many of the netbooks did just that.

  40. It works fine for both things by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I certainly wouldn't want to be using one as a development machine, or for serious photography (my other main computer use).

    It works fine for both things, which are more often read constrained...

    If you really need something with fast write speeds you can attach an external spinning drive (which is what I do with photography since no SSD is large enough to be practical for serious photographic use). WIth Thunderbolt external storage can be every bit as fast as internal storage, and even the USB 3.0 is not bad.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:It works fine for both things by Geeky · · Score: 1

      It's not so much speed as number of writes, although I see a sibling post addresses that.

      Storage size is another good point, and a laptop with a built in 500GB drive is far more useful for me. I guess I wouldn't use it for serious photo editing anyway, as a physically larger screen is going to be better even if it's actually lower res (maybe? perhaps I should try)

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    2. Re:It works fine for both things by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Well, if Apple didn't go messing with things, they had a pretty good system with the 2011 - 2012 15 and 17 inchers:

      I have a 17" with a 256GB SSD and a 1 TB spinning disk in the DVD caddy (aftermarket holder, takes 30 minutes to install, piece of cake). A great combo. I keep the OS, programs and media that I'm actively playing with on the SSD, dump the pictures or video files I'm not currently working with, but not ready to archive on the HD.

      I also keep a hot backup of the OS partition on the HD so I can boot off that should the SSD go tits up during an inconvenient time.

      But looks like this will be the last time I can get away with that. Might have to get an early 2012 model and store it for a while....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  41. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BasilBrush · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How many user replaceable parts has your TV got?
    What's that you say? A little louder. None!
    So does that make you a fool too?

    The fool is the person that didn't realise that computers will go the same way as every other technology. More advanced, more integrated, more miniaturised, less user serviceable.

  42. Brilliant Move by Apple by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

    It was only a matter of time that the clued into the fact that they were losing precious profits to after-market RAM and Storage upgrades. Now Apple can be assured that their consumers will be paying FULL APPLE PRICE for RAM and Storage instead of pennies on the Apple Dollar by purchasing at cheap hardware vendors who can't offer the Apple® experience.

    1. Re:Brilliant Move by Apple by Macman408 · · Score: 1

      I agree, to a certain extent - I never buy RAM or storage from Apple either. But it is certainly true that soldering it on saves a fair amount of space (and a little weight) in a very tight design - and at least the SSD is socketed, so somebody can reverse-engineer it and make a custom replacement, as has been done for the MacBook Air.

      I also found it interesting that Apple seems to effectively be charging less for the same RAM/storage options on the Retina MacBook Pro; if you upgrade the non-Retina one to the same 8 GB RAM/256 GB SSD that the base Retina model has, you're already paying $200 more than the base Retina model - and you're not getting the fancy new screen. All other specs are substantially the same (gain a Thunderbolt port, lose a FireWire 800 port, gain an HDMI port, lose an audio in port). And of course, if you compare it to the non-retina high-res screen version of the 15", add an extra $100 for that upgrade too.

      The 2.6 GHz version is similar; upgrade the drive from a 750 GB HD to a 512 GB SSD, and you're already paying $300 more for the low-res 15" model than the retina one.

      So they seem to be gouging less for these models than they do elsewhere in the product lineup.

    2. Re:Brilliant Move by Apple by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Apple RAM has dropped in price. Go figure, next conspiracy theory please.

  43. Re:no user-replaceable parts by vlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    unless you're a digital hoarder who feels the need to keep more music and TV/movies than any reasonable person can watch in a lifetime hard drives are large enough.

    Never say that kind of stuff around a video editor like my wife. You take maybe 25 to 100 hours of uncompressed high def documentary video, per project, times a couple simultaneous projects, oh whoops that's why I have a full size tower full of hard drives in the basement along with what sounds like a jet fighter auxiliary turbine power unit to cool it. Just one of her projects is about the size of my complete lifetime mp3 collection, or about the same as a full set of low-def star trek ... and she still has more projects. My digital hoard is pretty big by /.er standards, at least a TB, but compared to her half dozen half finished projects I'm just a rounding error.

    Someday, someone will make a laptop that can hold everything a semi-pro video editor needs, but that day isn't here yet, isn't even on the horizon. Maybe by 2020 or 2030?

    Apple is popular with the artsy craftsy AV crowd. There are people that do that kind of stuff on PCs, but they're kind of far and few between.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  44. They addressed all those by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I want a laptop that's light, cool (thermally), powerful, reliable, cheap, good A/V and silent.

    The new macbook pro is built with all of those things in mind, not just thinness...

    For A/V you can't beat thunderbolt. In theory you could attach two huge monitors.

    The fans are specially designed to be much quieter than other laptop fans (though how silent they really are remains to be seen).

    Thinness to me is not inherently that useful either, except it is an indicator of reduced weight which is really important.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  45. Can't swap batteries by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    About the only thing stopping me from buying something like that is that I can't swap batteries.

    I tend to charge the batteries in the evening/night, and then use them both during the day, occasionally flattening them both. That's despite using a normal battery (~3+ hours) + a double battery (~6+ hours) and being careful with how much the Wi-Fi is switched on.

    I'm okay with parts not being replaceble on laptops (after all, when we do want to replace something, we usually want to replace the lot) but at least give me option of swapping battery!!!

    1. Re:Can't swap batteries by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Then don't buy a MBP.

      I used to carry three batteries for my old MBP, with replaceable batteries. Then I got a new one without - the built in battery lasts longer than two of the old batteries, and the thing charges so fast that it's rarely (actually never) a problem.

    2. Re:Can't swap batteries by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Why not use an external battery solution? I would expect a Hyperjuice pack to work. It's not like you're going to be freed from carrying an extra battery around, so unless you're in a place where you just can't be tethered to your backpack you'll be okay.

      I'd be more disappointed that the new MBP consumes 50% more power than the previous version (7h runtime with a 94Wh battery vs the old MBP at 7h with a 60 wh battery)

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    3. Re:Can't swap batteries by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is sort-of unfortunate. My MBP is three-four years old now. I have the disposable income to buy another one, and I could at any time, but I'm not happy at the inability to swap the battery. I'd sort-of like an optical drive, too, but I could live with external for that.

      I guess I'm in a minority they no longer care to sell to - I guess now that I have an iPod Touch, iPhone, iPad, and MBP they'd rather go make a new customer than keep one they already have.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    4. Re:Can't swap batteries by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is sort-of unfortunate. My MBP is three-four years old now. I have the disposable income to buy another one, and I could at any time, but I'm not happy at the inability to swap the battery. I'd sort-of like an optical drive, too, but I could live with external for that.

      If your MBP is three to four years old, then it has a battery that needs replacing every 300 or maybe 400 charges. Newer MacBooks have batteries that last 1000 charges. Yes, you have to pay for the battery replacement instead of just for the battery, but overall you will save money with the newer, non-user replaceable battery.

    5. Re:Can't swap batteries by wfolta · · Score: 1

      You do this with a MacBook Pro? I wasn't aware that they had "double battery" capabilities. Or are you talking about other brands? I've easily gotten 7+ hours of usage on a bus trip with my old 17" Macbook pro, non-replaceable battery, and I'm trying to think of a usage scenario where I'd use it more intensely or longer without any access to power.

  46. Re:no user-replaceable parts by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Wanting to have a large hard drive is not a mental defect. I cannot speak for him but the reason I have purchased MBP's in the past is I have *work* to do. I can easily chew up several gigs just working on one element of a project. I've had to go the external drive route before and besides risking somebody walking away with it and some sensitive data, it eats power and reduces mobility.

    Seriously, on this site in particular, I cannot believe some wanker would come along and mod up your post. "Pffftbtbt, large hard drives are for loseres.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  47. Yes, you can fit more data by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    if you currently can fit 40 lines of code in a single editor window on your existing 1440x900 display, on this new 2880x1800 "retina" display, you will be able to fit those same 40 lines of code, just with extra clarity.

    That's not true. With the extra clarity you can shrink font sizes down a bit more. I can read really small text on the iPad or iPhone retina displays.

    Your argument also would mean that you could have the resolution of a laptop and it would not be a loss of resolution either! Come on.

    And for photo work the pixels matter very much. You can get a much better sense of actual sharpness and details of an image with the new display.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  48. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BasilBrush · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Time moves on. It's the iPad of laptops. You decide on capacity at the time you buy it. People aren't complaining about the non-upgradability of iPads.

    In much the same way, you don't buy a car with a small engine and then upgrade it to a large engine. You trade it in if you need that bigger engine.

  49. Re:Repairability Manufacturability by mlts · · Score: 1

    I'm curious about something with the pentalobe screws. Other than being used for tamper-resistance, I wonder if they allow for additional torque to be applied without camming out (a la Robertson or Torx.) If this were the case, it would make sense for Apple to use it.

  50. Re:I have Realistic Consumer specifications by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Heh. In six months when Lenovo has a 220dpi screen suddenly it'll be a big deal around here.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  51. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

    Actually, it actually renders at 2880x1800. It just scales the UI elements, text and such, not the complete rendered screen. They're not just upscaled like some crappy DVD on a 1080p monitor. Basically, anything that can be rendered full-res is done so, for anything that can't (like say, custom UI widgets) will however be upscaled.

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  52. No, not glossy. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I have a matte screen currently (the 17").

    I also did not like the older Macbook glossy screens.

    From seeing the display in person the new Macbook Retina screen doesn't seem much more glossy than the matte display.

    The thing is that matte displays ALSO reflect light, just not as much (or more diffuse).

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  53. Re:no user-replaceable parts by jimicus · · Score: 2

    Nope, it's soldered in too. Which means you either buy all you're likely to need for the foreseeable future now or you prepare to upgrade much earlier than you otherwise would.

    On the bright side, Apple's laptops typically hold their value much better than their PC equivalents. Which makes the trade-in option much more viable.

  54. Re:Repairability Manufacturability by mikael_j · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure the manufacturers know that the smart users will figure out how to open whatever electronic gizmo they've used special screws for. Hell, the dumb ones will as well. The difference they make is that they do mean you have to actually put in a bit of effort to get into the case, stops idiots from opening up their hardware, breaking it and then claiming it was already broken...

    --
    Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  55. 0 interest. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1
    I'll admit, this laptop seems nice, and I'd be curious what this could do.
    Sure there's tons of reasons not to get this, such as, well, apple. And the horrid price point.
    But this kills any interest it has for me:

    and the fact that this thing has no user-replaceable parts at all.

    I'm not paying 2k+ for a disposable laptop.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:0 interest. by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      and the fact that this thing has no user-replaceable parts at all.

      I'm not paying 2k+ for a disposable laptop.

      I would not pay that for any laptop, never mind a disposable one.

      Apple is clearly aiming at the more-money-than-sense market segment here.

    2. Re:0 interest. by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

      It has served them well in the past. :/

      --
      What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  56. Divided opinions on the Internets by pointyhat · · Score: 1

    I've done a fair bit of looking around at this and I can only find two opinions:

    1. What ifixit said. Can't replace the battery, screen, RAM, disk or anything. It's an iPad with a keyboard.

    2. Fanboy drooling and the sound of Hipster's credit cards melting. Please can someone explain how these individuals even crawled out of the oceans!

    I own a 5 year old Thinkpad T61 (running Windows - there I admitted it) that's had more replacement parts than the queen's hips so I'm firmly in (1) or vagina.

    1. Re:Divided opinions on the Internets by FrkyD · · Score: 1

      Really? I have 5 year old Macbook Pro 13" and the only thing I have replaced is the harddrive. Not because I had to, but because I wanted to have some SSD fun. That means I payed about $500 less upfront, it has lasted just as long and I have payed less in replacement parts.

      Sounds like you might have qualified for number 2 as well...

  57. Re:no user-replaceable parts by An+Ominous+Coward · · Score: 2

    My TV hardware is not in an evolutionary arms race with the media that runs on it. It had a long useful life on its own, and an array of various input and output expansion ports to increase its viability. PCs, even those from Apple, are in a constant tug of war between software designed to push the cutting edge and better performing hardware, with faster release cycles than you see in other consumer electronics.

  58. Unexpected by who? by Bill+Hayden · · Score: 1

    "As with the iPhone and iPad, the MacBook Pro with Retina display was really rather unexpected." As far as I knew, EVERYONE was expecting this. All the key changes - no CD, no Ethernet, Retina display - had been leaked several months ago. What kind of lame journalism is that?

    --
    Protect your browser with the Force Safe Search add-on
  59. Let's focus on the product by AlfaMike · · Score: 1

    Why do most of the top comments have to be about bashing Apple? It's not news that they have questionable business practices. I, for one, am glad someone put out a laptop screen with this resolution in an industry that has just settled for 1900x1080 max years ago and doesn't seem to be very interested in changing it any time soon. Maybe now they'll be forced too.

    1. Re:Let's focus on the product by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Why do most of the top comments have to be about bashing Apple? It's not news that they have questionable business practices. I, for one, am glad someone put out a laptop screen with this resolution in an industry that has just settled for 1900x1080 max years ago and doesn't seem to be very interested in changing it any time soon. Maybe now they'll be forced too.

      Fine by me but I'll wait until someone puts one of those screen in a laptop that actually lets me replace broken parts and upgrade the ram and disk.

    2. Re:Let's focus on the product by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      Why do most of the top comments have to be about bashing Apple? It's not news that they have questionable business practices. I, for one, am glad someone put out a laptop screen with this resolution in an industry that has just settled for 1900x1080 max years ago and doesn't seem to be very interested in changing it any time soon. Maybe now they'll be forced too.

      Fine by me but I'll wait until someone puts one of those screen in a laptop that actually lets me replace broken parts and upgrade the ram and disk.

      My thoughts exactly. The hardware is fantastic, but being packed in an equivalent of a blister pack really doesn't fly for me. I don't know about failing batteries, but every laptop I've owned had dust/fan problems (may have something to do with the apartment building I'm in, I don't know) and not being able to open one up to clean/replace those is a concern for me.

      Sounds like a laptop equivalent of German vehicles, for people who just want them to drive, and take them in for service when the light tells them to, but couldn't care less for actually knowing why the wheels spin.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    3. Re:Let's focus on the product by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You do realize that your kind are just a small rowboat in the Sea of Potential Consumers? A small rowboat madly paddling against the tide, wind and current.

      Apple knows it's market one hell of a lot better than you do.

      Gotta love Slashdot though. Somebody could be making a lot of money on us taking the Slashdot Groupthink and shorting it hard.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Let's focus on the product by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      That's what AppleCare is for. My MBP has had a replacement HDD, battery and fan, all covered under the extended warranty. Frankly, for a $2k machine, spending an extra $150 to get *everything* covered for 3 years is a no brainer.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    5. Re:Let's focus on the product by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      If you've ever taken apart a Macbook, you should know they never go back quite the same way after... all them little tabs and clips you have to pry...

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
  60. The Mona Lisa wasn't built ... by crovira · · Score: 3

    with user serviceable paint either.

    The tinkerers don't like it for the same reason that they don't like modern cars with electronic fuel injection systems.

    You can't pop open the hood and get at the system's guts.

    If it was easy to do, we'd all have cheap, reliable, fast flying cars already.

    The component layout, the integrity and holistic design approach make this an assembled piece of industrial art.

    As for Apple's achievement... I'll let the lick-worthy-ness of all of their pieces of functional industrial design speak for Apple's real genius.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    1. Re:The Mona Lisa wasn't built ... by Moheeheeko · · Score: 5, Funny
      ....Did you seriously just compare the Mona Lisa to A FUCKING MACBOOK?

      People like you are the only reason Apple is making money. Period.

    2. Re:The Mona Lisa wasn't built ... by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Ok, so the Commodore 64 didn't have any user-replaceable parts either. It's obviously a marvel of engineering. Or what's your actual point?

      Had they managed to fit everything using standard parts, it would have been impressive. Now it's just standard procedure.

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    3. Re:The Mona Lisa wasn't built ... by spire3661 · · Score: 2

      You do realize that what makes most paintings special is their placement in history right? The development of the art of painting over centuries. The same could be said of the MacBook. Its a prime example of a laptop of this time.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:The Mona Lisa wasn't built ... by crovira · · Score: 1

      Just showing you that it doesn't contain any user serviceable parts. (It must have been effective. :-)

      I leave the aesthetic judgements to others.

      Apple is just a well designed piece of hardware, intentionally so.

      I own IOS, Linux, OS X and Windows devices. They all have their uses and their limitations.

      --
      MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
    5. Re:The Mona Lisa wasn't built ... by chill · · Score: 1

      Actually, there was a user-replaceable fuse in the C64. Most people didn't know about it. Remember those ads in the back of magazines for "fixing" your dead C64 for a flat rate of $99? The vast majority of the time it was a blown $0.10 fuse.

      I paid for a moped with a year's service of "I'll fix your C64 with same-day turn around, flat rate $50. If I can't fix it, no charge."

      Eventually Commodore moved that fuse into the power brick, ruining my scam ... uh, business.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    6. Re:The Mona Lisa wasn't built ... by narcc · · Score: 1

      "User-replaceable" had a different definition then, when a large number of computer hobbyists were perfectly comfortable servicing electronics themselves, iron in hand.

    7. Re:The Mona Lisa wasn't built ... by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

      I think the reason Apple is making money is because a bajillion people are buying i-devices and accompanying apps. Computers are nice.... products the plebes want to buy en masse is even nicer for apple.

    8. Re:The Mona Lisa wasn't built ... by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      Weren't most of the chips socketted on the C64? At least they were on the earlier models of Amiga... You could pull out and replace most of the chips, making the systems quite easily user serviceable.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    9. Re:The Mona Lisa wasn't built ... by _133MHz · · Score: 1

      There's a glass fuse on the Commodore 64 motherboard you can replace yourself without soldering. Same deal with the keyboard, a couple of screws and a plug. Even some of the main chips are socketed for easy replacement.

  61. Re:no user-replaceable parts by aaron552 · · Score: 1

    I'm believe that the upgrade to 16GB or RAM is $200. That's around $60-$70 more than buying 2x8GB RAM sticks for an ordinary user-upgradeable notebook.

    --
    I had a sig once. It was lost in the great storm of '09.
  62. Re:no user-replaceable parts by aaron552 · · Score: 1

    Not on this MacBook Pro. It is not user serviceable. It uses proprietary screws, the RAM is soldered to the motherboard, the battery is glued in place and the "hard disk" is also proprietary but also the only upgradeable part (apart from possibly the WiFi/Bluetooth module) In short, RTF iFixit Article.

    --
    I had a sig once. It was lost in the great storm of '09.
  63. my precious by fenix23 · · Score: 1

    I'll admit... it's expensive, it's not user upgradable, it's a close environment, but it works for me (and is not for everyone). Besides, it's shiny and we wants it. It's my precious.

  64. High PPI monitors by pev · · Score: 1

    And why is everyone excited and asking why it hasn't been done before?
          http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_T220/T221_LCD_monitors

    1. Re:High PPI monitors by Microlith · · Score: 1

      Because:

      * That's not in a laptop
      * Those cost several tens of thousands of dollars when they came out
      * They required two DVI connections to operate, and behaved weirdly because of it
      * Low (40Hz) refresh rate

    2. Re:High PPI monitors by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      That monitor is not in a laptop, that's why.

    3. Re:High PPI monitors by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Even so, IBM was also shipping 2048x1536 in a 15" laptop several years ago.

  65. No user replaceable parts? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    I like user replaceable parts. I don't want to buy a laptop that won't let me upgrade the ram, swap the hard disk, or change the screen if I crack it.

    This really is for people who just fall for Oh! Shiny!

  66. Re:Could Linux on there skip the "retina" part? by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I deeply wish to know this, and shall take an Ubuntu usb stick into the Apple store to find out.

    --
    "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
  67. Flaming by Danzigism · · Score: 1

    There are a million things I could say to flame the new MBP. Why am I not excited about it like so many others are? 5400 RPM hard drives on their non-retina base line models is a start. Did Apple buy millions of these things before the floods in Thailand and they're still trying to get rid of them? Yea, there are things like short-stroking, but it's still a piece of crap 5400 RPM drive that is slower and less reliable than a SSD. I simply question some of the choices Apple made in regards to the hardware for their other models. I suppose $2199 is a fair price for their actual retina model even though it's way out of my personal budget. But to me, it would have said a lot about their character to just include a stupid 128gb SSD drive with their non-retina base line model without having to spend an extra $200. It's just ridiculous to even give people an option to chose such outdated hardware for being such a cutting edge company.

    --
    *plays the Apogee theme song music*
  68. IT Nightmare by na1led · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If our firm had these laptops and they broke down, how am I suppose to remove/wipe the hard drive? I would have to take a Sludge Hammer to the laptop in the parking lot, just to be sure no sensitive data gets out.

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
    1. Re:IT Nightmare by RecoveredMarketroid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You use the full-disk encryption, so you don't have this problem.

    2. Re:IT Nightmare by nickscalise · · Score: 1

      No need to remove. Just boot in Target mode, connect a TB cable to it, mount the drive to another running system, and wipe away.

    3. Re:IT Nightmare by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      If our firm had these laptops and they broke down, how am I suppose to remove/wipe the hard drive? I would have to take a Sludge Hammer to the laptop in the parking lot, just to be sure no sensitive data gets out.

      Come on. You could make money by charging your Apple-hating employees (and you know you have a couple) to drive over the thing in an SUV. Back and forth.

      It would be good for the wallet, the soul and the economy. What's not to like?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:IT Nightmare by knarf · · Score: 1

      I would have to take a Sludge Hammer

      My brain vacillates between two different, equally disgusting concepts trying to imagine the device you just invented. In one of the images, someone is whacking a pool of, well, sludge, with a hammer. This seems rather pointless. The operator of said sludge hammer is thoroughly drenched in slimy goo, and smells accordingly.

      The other image seems straight out of Lovecraft, where by some form of unknown magic a mass of sludge stays firmly attached to the end of a pole. This pole is wielded with dire consequences by one of the old ones. Anyone who gets to meet the business end of his sludge hammer does not live to tell the tale, nor do they die. They simply are to busy screaming to be able to tell anything.

      Neither of these devices seem to be of use in getting rid of unwanted data on a fruitbook though. for those purposes may I suggest using a sledge hammer?

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    5. Re:IT Nightmare by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      It doesn't have a hard drive, it has SSDs.

      And because of wear leveling, drives marketed at X gigabytes actually have (X + Y%) GB, so secure erasures on SSDs apparently aren't very secure at all since writing random 1s and 0s won't necessarily overwrite the areas of memory where the original documents actually are, like they would traditional HDDs.

      So yes you need to remove (rip out) the SSD and sledgehammer it anyway to be sure.

    6. Re:IT Nightmare by acoustix · · Score: 1

      No need to remove. Just boot in Target mode, connect a TB cable to it, mount the drive to another running system, and wipe away.

      You must have missed this crucial part: "and they broke down". Meaning it was no longer working at all.

      --
      "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    7. Re:IT Nightmare by wfolta · · Score: 1

      Loosen some screws with the super-secret, special screwdriver and pull out the SSD. It's not glued in.

    8. Re:IT Nightmare by trashcanman · · Score: 1

      Three words: Target Disk Mode

      --
      The Dread Pirate Roberts is here for your soul!
    9. Re:IT Nightmare by drerwk · · Score: 1

      If our firm had these laptops and they broke down, how am I suppose to remove/wipe the hard drive? I would have to take a Sludge Hammer to the laptop in the parking lot, just to be sure no sensitive data gets out.

      Forget the whole disk encryption recovery key is how I would do it. How do you deal with stolen laptop data security?

    10. Re:IT Nightmare by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Even so, it doesn't have a FireWire port anyway so that's out. (and no Ethernet, and only 2 USB. WTF Apple?)

  69. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Score+Whore · · Score: 1

    I don't compress all of them right away because it's a pain...

    You know, we have these things called computers. They are well suited for doing batches of repetitive tasks. Why don't you just have a directory where you drop your uncompressed content and have a script that, say during whatever times you are typically asleep, starts transcoding your content? You just rip it and forget it and a day or two later it shows up in your compressed video directory.

  70. last MBP iBuy... by otaku244 · · Score: 1
    Don't get me wrong, I've love the MPB I have now. I've had it for 6 years. Before that, I had a PB G4 for 5 years. When the warranty expired, I made the fixes myself.
    Problems with the new MBP Retina:
    1. 1) I don't trust that they will work beyond 5 years without me tooling around the inside
    2. 2) I don't want to have to trust my backups if my MBP bricks. I should be able to pull out my HDD myself and conduct recovery
    3. 3) If I want a bigger HDD, I WANT TO INSTALL IT MYSELF!!!
    4. 4) Information security relies on being able to remove an HDD in some cases, how can you do that on the MBP-R?
    5. 5) Apple RAM is stupid expensive. I want to drop my OWN RAM in when I want to upgrade.
    6. 6) I-WANT-A-FREAKIN'-ETHERNET-JACK.... JACK! Yes, I need one for the work I do. Carrying around a dongle is a huge clash with the "it just works" philosophy Apple has cultivated on this product line.
    7. 7) No DVD drive is a problem... but I can get by without one.

    An MBP is not a foldable iPad. It is a high-end general purpose computer. I think the App Store is a cool idea, but I hate feeling like Apple is herding me into their system to control my purchases.
    I think it's safe to say you won't see me buy another MBP if they are serious about heading in this direction. I can go buy a cheaper boutique laptop that does most of what I want. I may just buy a mini for the wrest.

    --
    Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
    1. Re:last MBP iBuy... by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      Well, Apple sells two entirely different MacBook Pro 15" models. Which would be the same in those respects, except that you can't just buy a replacement battery and install it yourself (but then your six year old MBP needed three battery replacements when a new one needs one).

      I hope Retina display will be available for other models as well in a year or so.

    2. Re:last MBP iBuy... by otaku244 · · Score: 1

      My bad. I thought they were getting rid of the good ones entirely. Thanks for the response.

      --
      Mod me down, I shall become more off-topic than you could possibly imagine.
  71. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Cramer · · Score: 1

    "User replaceable" is open to debate -- depends on the user, really. The consumer isn't supposed to (or expected to) disassemble their TV. HOWEVER, there are numerous replacable parts inside them. (input processors (aka tuners), speakers, speaker drivers, back lights, display drivers, power supplies, ...)

    Laptops have never been "servicing friendly". They're cramming a whole lot of stuff in a very tiny space. It's more than a pain in the *** to even disassemble one; actually repairing the tiny, and often flimzy, boards is Real Work(tm).

  72. Re:I have Realistic Consumer specifications by netsavior · · Score: 1

    My laptop doesn't even have ten eighty peas. I cry myself to sleep every night, snuggled up against my turtleneck that isn't even black.

  73. But does it cure... by The_Star_Child · · Score: 1

    pancreatic cancer? ... Too soon?

  74. Re:Could Linux on there skip the "retina" part? by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    The hardware has a higher screen resolution. Any OS could use it.

    Screen resolution isn't software magic..

  75. Re:no user-replaceable parts by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    But theres generally nothing worth upgrading in a TV.
    With laptops, RAM and HDD / SSD come to mind.

  76. Re:Apple is truly amazing by Lord+Lode · · Score: 2

    I'm more amazed by the fact that I had to buy a 27" desktop screen just to get a tiny resolution of 1920x1200, even though technology is capable of making higher pixel density. And I didn't WANT a 27" monitor, I wanted a smaller one with higher resolution, but it just doesn't exist (except these super expensive medical or industrial ones).

    At least there seems to be ONE thing on which Apple and me agree.

  77. Re:no user-replaceable parts by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

    Apple is doing one thing smart here, they are making a design that if produced by the tens of millions (which these will surely be) will prove to be VERY cheap.

    For Apple you mean. They seem to have no compunctions about offering a $200 upgrade from 8GB to 16GB, a sum that would be questionable even if it were high end ECC server RAM.

  78. Apple traditionally screws users for RAM by alispguru · · Score: 1

    And I say this as a long-time Mac user. Bumping the Retina Mac Book Pro from 8GB to 16 GB RAM costs $200.

    I know the RAM in this machine is very new, but 8GB of standard laptop RAM is currently around $50 - $75.

    If adding 8GB cost $100, I would agree with your analysis. $200 is standard highway robbery for Apple RAM.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:Apple traditionally screws users for RAM by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Apple RAM upgrade prices are often not too bad at the time of a product launch. The problem is that they then stay the same even when the price of the RAM has halved (or more). When the Mac Mini was introduced, the price of an upgrade to 1GB was cheaper than doing it yourself. A year later, it cost the same.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Apple traditionally screws users for RAM by Gr8Apes · · Score: 2

      I too am a long time Mac user. And I agree Apple generally charges far too much for their RAM. However, doing some searching for 10 minutes quickly shows that DDR3L memory in 8GB modules runs anywhere from $60-160 each, for the extremely few that you can find. Note I mention modules, not SODIMMs. So $200 for 16GB total memory may not be a bad deal at all.

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  79. Re:no user-replaceable parts by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    I'm believe that the upgrade to 16GB or RAM is $200. That's around $60-$70 more than buying 2x8GB RAM sticks for an ordinary user-upgradeable notebook.

    Read carefully: I did NOT say "same price as an ordinary notebook that is upgradeable" and that is not even close to what I meant. The price savings from not putting a little door, and a socket, and all the other work that goes into making it upgradeable can be cost-cut and the difference can be felt when buying the upgraded version (the max ram version is cheaper than it would have been if it were socketed and you bought the upgrade). Since its pointless as of now to compare the specs on this machine (no other machine has even close to that screen resolution) only time will tell if Apple has passed the savings on to the consumer (like they did with the iPad 3) or if they have merely pocketed it and charged more anyway.

  80. iFixit need to fix it by 2phar · · Score: 1
    Whoops.

    I couldn't find any available servers to fill your request.

    Wait a few seconds and try again, or call us if the problem persists.

    sales@iFixit.com | 1-866-61-FIXIT

  81. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by LocalH · · Score: 1

    It is better than XP, but when you hammer the fonts to the pixel grid, you change the spacing in subtle ways that add up quick. Ever noticed how glyphs are weirdly spaced in Word on Windows? It's because they're positioning the glyphs according to the unhinted version (essentially) but still displaying it with full hinting.

    --
    FC Closer
  82. Re:no user-replaceable parts by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Same argument for laptops. Anything bought today will have a long useful life. Thunderbolt will provide an array of various input & output expansion ports.

    Yes, there will be new machines next month/year. But that doesn't make the current ones useless. Any more than the 60" 120Hz plasma displays made my old SD tv in the basement obsolete. The kids still play Wii on it just fine.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  83. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by LocalH · · Score: 1

    In this case, non-DPI aware programs don't gain the benefit of higher resolution text, UI widgets, etc. They're still rendered at the original resolution and upscaled by the DWM. This may also cause the whole thing to be less crisp because the GPU will likely apply interpolation to the image, softly blurring it. From what I've seen and experienced, Apple's 2x implementation uses simple pixel quadrupling, which I personally prefer.

    --
    FC Closer
  84. iFixit link is wrong by Crayola · · Score: 1

    The Slashdot article has a typo: .org should be .com

    I was hoping I could get the non-retina version and swap out the hard drive for a slightly more reasonably priced SSD, but it looks like that won't work.

  85. Unrepairable by user by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

    Unrepairable by user is a surprise? I thought Apple computers shipped with a screw driver detecting alarm that invalidated the warranty if an unlicensed screwdriver got within five feet of one.

    --
    by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
  86. Re:no user-replaceable parts by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Informative

    As someone above said:

    It's DDR3L SDRAM - that L stands for low-power. If you can even find a high-speed DDR3L sodimm, you will pay more for it than for the Apple memory. What do you get with that L? Maybe about an hour more battery life with 16GB installed. Is 17% longer battery life worth the $100 premium? Probably to most people spending $3K or more on a laptop already.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  87. iFixit slashdotted, Google cache link by xded · · Score: 1
  88. Re:no user-replaceable parts by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    WTF are "proprietary screws"?? You can't buy the screws or the driver bits? Or what?

  89. Re:no user-replaceable parts by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

    The SSD is socketed because it is one of the most common points of failure and Apple expect to replace a fair few of them. Not saying Apple quality is shit, that's just the nature of SSDs and HDDs before them.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  90. Memory upgrades are becoming a myth anyway. by Zaphod-AVA · · Score: 2

    I don't like it, but it's clear that consumers are not all that interested in upgrading their computers anymore. The local box stores (Staples, Best Buy) failed to carry laptop DDR3, and often don't have any for desktops in stock either. When you look at their selection of RAM, it didn't fit in *any* of the products they sell.

  91. Re:no user-replaceable parts by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    I run a video service for all my family members off of 3 TB. Almost 2000 movies. You are doing it wrong. Rip the DVD, compress, delete DVD files. Fuck Blu-ray, horribly bloated but then im not a videophile in that sense. I prefer high availability over absolute pixel perfection.

    --
    Good-bye
  92. Re:no user-replaceable parts by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

    This would work fine in a consumer-aimed laptop. But this isn't: It's a professional laptop, for people who have serious data to work with. People who edit raw video, or animate 3D movies with huge resource sets, or visualise scientific data. A 768GB SSD is a wonderful thing, but I'm guessing it'll be a lot less wonderful in two years... and you won't be able to upgrade without buying a new laptop.

  93. Re:no user-replaceable parts by spire3661 · · Score: 2

    I complain every time is see a Micro SD card laying on top of my ipad. They couldnt find a way to cram it in??? Annoying.

    --
    Good-bye
  94. Following pages by xded · · Score: 1

    Page 2.
    Page 3.

    (Sorry, Google didn't cache the one-page version.)

  95. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is where the fact that Apple chose to use unhinted fonts is a big win. Windows can't easily do high DPI because many programs are not designed for it, font spacing will be way off in some programs because Microsoft chooses to hammer fonts to the pixel grid.

    I guess you have never tried it. High DPI works flawlessly in Windows 7. Newer apps scale properly, older ones just get zoomed in the same as Apple have done. Fonts look excellent and scale as expected, no kerning issues or anything like that.

    Apple has to make its fonts thicker because they don't snap to the pixel grid and thus you can't expect a 1 pixel wide line to look good. That isn't a good thing, it means thin fonts look terrible.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  96. Re:no user-replaceable parts by s73v3r · · Score: 1

    Yes, but where the fuck are you going to buy memory that's thin enough to fit in that body, let alone a slot that's thin enough to fit in there.

  97. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Windows can't easily do high DPI because many programs are not designed for it, font spacing will be way off in some programs because Microsoft chooses to hammer fonts to the pixel grid.

    DirectWrite (and frameworks which use it, like WPF) use ideal rendering rather than pixel snapping by default.

  98. Re:no user-replaceable parts by njen · · Score: 1

    Not a fair comparison. The history of laptops has had replaceable parts, TV's never have.

    Laptops having replaceable parts has saved me thousands of dollars and is a cheap means of extending the life of hardware...it's definitely a selling point for me and a lot of other people.

  99. Re:no user-replaceable parts by chill · · Score: 1

    Correct. They are protected by patent.

    Didn't you ever wonder why there were so many different screw-head types? Standard, Phillips, Torx, Hex, Allen, etc

    Patents, baby.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  100. Re:no user-replaceable parts by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

    Tablets and laptops are totally different. I don't store tons of music, do sound sampling and video editing, and store my entire picture collection on my tablet. I have upgraded my storage on my desktop computer from 500gb to 2tb. If I hadn't, I would have run out of room. I am very glad I was able to easily upgrade my storage rather than have to buy a whole new system because I had one too many video editing projects.

    Comparing tablet upgradability to laptop upgradability is silly, IMO. :)

  101. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by Webz · · Score: 1

    Could you elaborate on how Microsoft is on the losing end of the high DPI displays? I've heard this argument before regarding the fonts but something isn't clicking.

    If pixels get smaller as the DPI goes up (true?) then doesn't pixel snapping mean less at higher densities?

    Pixel snapping and unhinted fonts should converge at infinite resolutions, no?

  102. Yeah but... by GReaToaK_2000 · · Score: 1

    Will it blend? (I hope he tries) http://www.willitblend.com/

  103. Re:no user-replaceable parts by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

    How many user replaceable parts has your TV got?
    What's that you say? A little louder. None!
    So does that make you a fool too?

    The fool is the person that didn't realise that computers will go the same way as every other technology. More advanced, more integrated, more miniaturised, less user serviceable.

    How many parts of my TV are things which I would conceivably want to upgrade? Zero. How many parts on my TV are things that have significant wear within the lifetime of the TV? 1. And yes, it is user-replaceable (the DLP backlight). It tells you right in the manual how to replace it, and it's a fairly easy procedure with an easily accessible compartment on the back of the TV. Everything else on the TV is expected to last pretty much indefinitely, so if it breaks, it's a repair job, not expected to be user-serviceable.

    How many parts on a laptop are things which I would want to upgrade? RAM, hard drive, battery (for a future model that is more energy dense, maybe). I expect these things to be user replaceable. How many parts on the laptop are expected to have wear out with time? The battery. To even consider buying a device with a battery that is not user replaceable is madness. Now, I'm not going to stop you from doing so, because it's your money, but you can't convince me to spend my money on such a product.

  104. Not only that by busyqth · · Score: 1

    Apple had better be careful about pissing off tech savvy people. We are the market leaders. We set the trends.

    And of course, you are also TEH K-R4D AW3$0M3 !!!

    1. Re:Not only that by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

      And of course, you are also TEH K-R4D AW3$0M3 !!!

      Yeah, yeah, yeah. Fine. But because of my either my job or being the default "tech guy" in my family, I have probably been largely responsible for about 20 mac purchases by other people. I suspect that is above the average. Thus my assertion that I am a market leader.

      --
      This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
  105. Re:no user-replaceable parts by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but a lot of people don't max out their ram at purchase. They buy the computer, wait 12-24 months for the memory to get cheap, then max it out to give the computer a few more years effective life.

  106. Re:Repairability Manufacturability by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    I'm curious about something with the pentalobe screws. Other than being used for tamper-resistance, I wonder if they allow for additional torque to be applied without camming out (a la Robertson or Torx.) If this were the case, it would make sense for Apple to use it.

    I doubt it. The Torx specification was specifically designed for machine insertion with controlled torque. The big advantage of a Torx drive is that the driver tip can have a relatively acute angle to the screw without damage to the head and with the ability to control the screw easily. This makes it easier to design automated construction equipment. The Pentalobe, even if it had some of those properties is really unlikely to be any better.

    Just different.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  107. Re:no user-replaceable parts by zoward · · Score: 1

    While I'm not a huge fan of Acer's laptops, I got a 7" Iconia from Best Buy's Black Friday sale, and I love it. It's held up extremely well to the beating my 8 and 4-year-olds have put it through.

    Also, they upgraded the OS version from Honeycomb to ICS six months after purchase. Not sure how common that is in the Android tablet world, but I'm getting the impression it's pretty rare for phones, especially here in the US.

    I'd buy another Iconia tomorrow. Giving credit where credit is due.

    --
    "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
  108. Predictions before reading thread: by stewbacca · · Score: 3, Funny

    My predictions about complaints before reading any comments include:

    No physical media (wah).
    No ethernet and/or have to spend money on cheap ethernet dongle (wah).
    No 17" version (super wah).
    Something about random slashdot guy's opinion about glossy/non-glossy screen and/or other insignificant personal preference
    I bet it will run too hotly.
    Not enough USB ports.
    And then a whole bunch of technically incorrect gripes about resolution, screen size, and dpi...

    Oh and let's not forgot the popular:
    OS X sucks (even though you can still run Windows on it if you like)
    no user-replaceable battery
    merely an expensive fashion item/social status

    And one last prediction is I'll have to correct some snarky fool who will say something stupid like "no right click" or something track-pad related where they miss the entire point of gestures because they've actually never used an Apple notebook and are trying to wedge their Dell-centric worldview onto Apple hardware.

    This should be fun.

    1. Re:Predictions before reading thread: by Cederic · · Score: 1

      one last prediction is I'll have to correct some snarky fool who will say something stupid like "no right click" or something track-pad related where they miss the entire point of gestures because they've actually never used an Apple notebook

      As someone who disables all touchpad capabilities other than moving the mouse around because of inadvertent clicks caused by my hands brushing over it as I type, a distaste for having to vary the pressure with which I use one and a general laziness of not wanting to learn a new fucking control scheme on every computer touchpad I use, please, enlighten me: What the fuck is the point of RSI inducing gestures when I've got a very serviceable pair of buttons just below the touchpad?

      I have no issue with people having access to and using gestures. I seriously fucking resent being forced into using a design that miserably fails to meet my needs. So by all means, add gestures, but make them configurable and provide sensible usable alternatives for those of us that want to do real work and not just wank over our laptops.

    2. Re:Predictions before reading thread: by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Well, for starters, if the entire trackpad surface is a physical click button (not talking about the tap to click, but you actually depress the track pad surface), then repetitive motion is reduced not having to go down to the bottom of the track pad. Right click register anywhere on the right half of the track pad surface. Even less RSI inducing is using two fingers to right click, however, that doesn't solve your problem of inadvertent clicking. Which, by the way, is why it is off by default.

      And for cryin' out cryin', show me a trackpad on the market that is more effective in conducting "real work". Maybe they don't work "for you", but at some point you have to concede you are an outlier.

    3. Re:Predictions before reading thread: by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go with "people must like them". Unless there are some interesting tin-foil hat theories out there I haven't heard yet.

    4. Re:Predictions before reading thread: by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I got more than what you give me credit for, but disappointingly low, considering this is slashdot where things like really great hardware suck if they costs more than the rent they have to pay for their moms' basements. $200 for RAM...oh the humanity. Instead, for $80, I'll buy this 4 inch thick 12 pound Dell and use the money I save to buy 8 more months of WoW subscription (that my 12 pound Dell can't run, so I have a $300 build-it-yerself rig for that).

  109. They managed to reduce it by crovira · · Score: 1

    to just the essential components.

    Elegance comes from the Latin E (meaning out) and LEGARE (meaning to choose).

    Elegant design has all unnecessary crap out-chosen from it.

    Jonathan Ives and the rest of the people at Apple, just happen to be brilliant at it.

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  110. Re:no user-replaceable parts by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

    unless you're a digital hoarder who feels the need to keep more music and TV/movies than any reasonable person can watch in a lifetime hard drives are large enough. worst case i can buy an external drive to archive photos/videos of my kids.

    most people don't have mental/OCD issues where they will have to see some photo from years ago right away

    Translation: "I don't have a need for more space, therefore nobody else does."

    I work writing software that is cross platform. My laptop has Mac OS X, Windows, and Linux installed. In addition, I have multiple VMs of those operating systems, for the cases where what I'm doing doesn't require testing outside the VM. I will take the largest hard drives I can reasonably afford, please.

  111. The Commodore C64 WAS the equivalent by crovira · · Score: 1

    in its day.

    Its sold in huge numbers because it was elegant (In some respects it was MORE elegant than the MacBook because it used another ubiquitous component, the TV, for its display.)

    Commodore's only fault was that they didn't know it, and couldn't follow it up, (otherwise you'd be up to your butt with nautically named products, instead of Lion this and Panther that...)

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  112. Re:no user-replaceable parts by busyqth · · Score: 1

    Then why does iFixit sell screwdrivers that can open this laptop?

  113. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    My TV hardware is not in an evolutionary arms race with the media that runs on it.

    Yes it is. Or have you missed the ongoing 3D wars and the emerging "smart tv" market with internet and on-demand content?

    Just because you don't care about these things doesn't mean the market isn't fundamentally changing while you aren't looking.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  114. I hope software vendors take note by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    I hope that software vendors start updating to work with high DPI displays. Key failures in this area are Firefox and (ironically) iTunes on Windows. Both don't handle high DPI settings properly.

  115. Re:Repairability Manufacturability by wavedeform · · Score: 1

    Pentalobe screwdrivers aren't really that proprietary.

  116. Re:no user-replaceable parts by acoustix · · Score: 1

    How many user replaceable parts has your TV got?
    What's that you say? A little louder. None!
    So does that make you a fool too?

    The fool is the person that didn't realise that computers will go the same way as every other technology. More advanced, more integrated, more miniaturised, less user serviceable.

    Actually my Samsung DLP TV has several user replaceable parts. Most notably is the lamp.

    I believe the point of the "no user-replaceable parts" jab is that desktop and notebook computers have generally had user replaceable parts in them which makes them easier to maintain. When parts are no longer replaceable you either end up with a very expensive paper weight or must ship the unit to be fixed. Whereas previously the part was purchased and inserted by the user.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  117. Re:no user-replaceable parts by acoustix · · Score: 1

    My TV hardware is not in an evolutionary arms race with the media that runs on it.

    Yes it is. Or have you missed the ongoing 3D wars and the emerging "smart tv" market with internet and on-demand content?

    Just because you don't care about these things doesn't mean the market isn't fundamentally changing while you aren't looking.

    Bad example. The vast majority of our society don't care about 3D TV. They don't want it and they don't want to pay for it. Just because there is something new available doesn't mean that it will become the new standard.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  118. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My TV hardware is not in an evolutionary arms race with the media that...

    Oh, the makers of 3d tv sets are not hearing you, lalalalalalalalala!

  119. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

    If your wife is willing to switch to the PC side and take up Premiere Pro CS6 or Vegas Pro 11, Origin PC makes a few 17" models with four hard disk bays, Blu-Ray burners, and 32GB of RAM. They're not cheap, and the battery is more of a UPS than anything useful for mobile slicing, but they might be worth a look.

  120. Re:"Engineering marvel ?" wtf ? by wfolta · · Score: 1

    "meeeeeeeh... Anyone can do it."

    I won't hold my breath waiting for Anyone Corp to actually do it.

  121. Re:Why does the review cover gaming specs? by wfolta · · Score: 1

    I've played WoW, Diablo III, etc, on my MacBook Pros. I've also booted it into Windows to play Skyrim. I bought it to do more than gaming, but it certainly does satisfy my gaming urges reasonably well. The new Macbook Pro Retina will actually perform better, even at the highest resolution (with Diablo III, anyhow), and at the same resolution as my old MacBook Pro it will fly.

    (People talk about gaming as a proxy for things like 3D work, video editing, and other tasks that a MacBook Pro might primarily be purchased for.)

  122. Very nice but... by Hamsterdan · · Score: 1

    Seriously, that resolution *and* IPS in a laptop?

    I'm glad they put a 16:10 screen in it, but 2880*1800 on a 15" doesn't really make sense IMO. Putting that kind of res on a 24-27 monitor (in 16:10 format) would make more sense.

    I can live with the glued battery and proprietary SSD, but the non-upgradeable RAM is a turn off.

    --
    I've got better things to do tonight than die.
  123. communist technology by mrybczyn · · Score: 2

    Now... If there was only an Apple product not made in communist countries... I'd be interested.

  124. Re:no user-replaceable parts by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    I can't agree more. Plenty of readers here should complain about why their washing machines uses Linux for the control but there's no public API nor a RS-232 port for tweaking purpose.

  125. Re:I have Realistic Consumer specifications by busyqth · · Score: 1

    My laptop doesn't even have ten eighty peas. I cry myself to sleep every night, snuggled up against my turtleneck that isn't even black.

    Because 100 Mhz is worth 1 million pixels.
    And 10 FPS is worth 2 million pixels.
    That's why good display panels are a waste of money.

  126. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Not a fair comparison. The history of laptops has had replaceable parts, TV's never have.

    I congratulate you on your youth. In the 70s and earlier, TVs used to go wrong about once a year. Most people of course called out an engineer to fix them. But geeks fixes their own. Usually it was a valve that was blown, and it was easy to diagnose - soot on the glass. All the valves were in sockets, so you could pull it out and replace it. Easy as replacing a lightbulb. But a LOT more dangerous. There were voltages in there that could kill you.

    Also resistors often blew. Again easy to diagnose by the missing component surrounded by soot. Fix for those was usually to replace the board - yes they were VERY serviceable by being modular. And then the blown component was often fixed back at the workshop and recycled.

  127. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    How many parts of my TV are things which I would conceivably want to upgrade?

    Who said anything about upgrade? We were just talking about user-replacable. And a big reason for that is that the part is faulty.

  128. So? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    Many users simply can't afford to buy the new model every year.

    And how many PC users buy a new PC laptop or change the memory/hdd "every year".

  129. Re:no user-replaceable parts by afidel · · Score: 1

    Last year Apple sold the new MBP at a rate of 3.6M/quarter at release, that's a far cry from tens of millions.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  130. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    It's not just fitting it in. It's the security and UI usability implications of having it there.

  131. Re:no user-replaceable parts by afidel · · Score: 1

    Huh, QAM HD recording are on the order of 4.8GB/hour coming out of my HDHomerun, how is 50 hours of recorded content unreasonable to you?

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  132. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Tablets and laptops are totally different. I don't store tons of music, do sound sampling and video editing, and store my entire picture collection on my tablet.

    Unlike tablets, this laptop has USB3 and Thunderbolt, both of which you can plug external drives to when you need the extra capacity.

    As your comparison is to a desktop computer, having external drives isn't a problem as far as portability goes.

  133. $1000/yr to Apple by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

    If you consider the Applecare as part of the purchase price, which is pretty much what is needed, there is no repairs.

    Yep - the Apple model is pretty well set in stone now: max out the specs when you buy it, buy AppleCare, and after 3 years get rid of it (possibly selling it for more than it should be worth) for a new one.

    If you're willing to give Apple $1K/yr they'll give you a pretty nice laptop and a nice experience. For many people that's a worthwhile bargain. Me, I'll wait until they repudiate their attacks against bloggers in court (as 'not real journalists'). Maybe without an ecomaniac in charge they could do that.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  134. Re:no user-replaceable parts by njen · · Score: 1

    Still not a fair comparison, you could not upgrade TV's, merely fix them. So you are calling late 30's youth, thanks very much, it's been a while since I have been called young :)

  135. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    So you are calling late 30's youth, thanks very much, it's been a while since I have been called young :)

    It is young for me. I wish I was still in my late 30s. ;-)

  136. Re:no user-replaceable parts by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

    If she used a Macbook she could be using this: http://www.elgato.com/elgato/na/mainmenu/products/ThunderboltSSD.html

    or

    This: http://www.promise.com/storage/raid_series.aspx?region=en-global&m=192&rsn1=40&rsn3=47&statistic=pegasus

    Either way you get amazing disk performance with a laptop. I edit hundreds of hours of video on mine.

  137. Re:no user-replaceable parts by makomk · · Score: 1

    Most laptops require a screwdriver to replace the hard drive. This one is no different. Except that in this case, the "hard drive" is a chip, third party versions of which will undoubtedly be available soon, just like the were for the Air

    So, aside from the fact that the screwdriver is proprietary, expensive, hard to obtain and incompatible with everything else, and the hard drive is proprietary, expensive, hard to obtain and incompatible with everything else, it's just like any other laptop.

  138. Re:no user-replaceable parts by makomk · · Score: 1

    Last I heard they were actually selling screwdrivers that were subtly the wrong shape and damaged the screw heads whilst removing them just because they couldn't actually source the right ones. Their recommendation was to replace the screws with more standard ones once you'd removed them.

  139. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    unless you're a digital hoarder who feels the need to keep more music and TV/movies than any reasonable person can watch in a lifetime hard drives are large enough.

    Never say that kind of stuff around a video editor like my wife. You take maybe 25 to 100 hours of uncompressed high def documentary video, per project, times a couple simultaneous projects, oh whoops that's why I have a full size tower full of hard drives in the basement along with what sounds like a jet fighter auxiliary turbine power unit to cool it. Just one of her projects is about the size of my complete lifetime mp3 collection, or about the same as a full set of low-def star trek ... and she still has more projects. My digital hoard is pretty big by /.er standards, at least a TB,

    I currently have about 400GB of music, losslessly compressed, and about 8 TB of movies/shows/videos (EyeTV rocks, and my entire HD DVD collection - <$3 / movie made it worthwhile). HD movies, even compressed to high quality (H264) will average between 4-5GB an hour before you start getting noticeable artifacts, with some animation being able to hit 1GB / hour. Digital video editing however, is another beast entirely. I've got 1 project that sucked up 1TB without breaking stride. Another at about 500GB. A third was light, at about 300GB. These are for 1-2 hours of video as a final project with 3 cameras or less. HD video editing makes the biggest drives look tiny, and you'll want a high speed connected RAID array. Don't try this on USB drives (any version).

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  140. no like, no buy by pbjones · · Score: 1

    If you don't like it, don't buy it. There is no gun pointed at your head, this isn't the only Laptop in the world. Apple wants you to buy the extended warranty, any people using any machine for business would do that anyway. The machine gets replaced when the Tax deductibility runs out, so long life is not an issue. Bah! just children looking for something to complain about.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  141. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    yes to both

  142. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

    DirectWrite (and frameworks which use it, like WPF) use ideal rendering rather than pixel snapping by default.

    And every time someone moves a major application to this framework, the users complain because it looks blurry as hell. We saw this with Visual Studio (I believe Microsoft eventually backed off and fixed the rendering) and with Firefox (fortunately, starting with FF7, you can tell it to use "GDI Classic" mode while keeping hardware acceleration on).

    DirectWrite was one of the first examples of one of the most destructive tendencies in Microsoft today: Apple envy. Windows 8 is the apogee of this trend. What they don't get is that they're not Apple, will never be Apple, and most of their users - especially the business users who pay the bills - don't want them to be Apple.

  143. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Zaelath · · Score: 1

    I think most iPad buyers admit that it's a toy, why would it need to be upgradable beyond it's purchase specs when people that buy them get a new one everytime they're released?

    People aren't ready to admit that their Mac laptop is a toy, and a small percentage of them use it for actual work so they're even justified.

    From my point of view, soldered in HDD == tears about data loss when the laptop breaks, since there's _no_ repair company on the planet that will warrant your data when you send the machine in for repair and I suspect apple would just be replacing the entire internals rather than soldering anything; so perhaps that will happen for battery replacement as well.

    The whole thing seems to be a massive fuck you to the types of people that allowed apple to survive between the ][c and the iPod.

  144. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    And every time someone moves a major application to this framework, the users complain because it looks blurry as hell. We saw this with Visual Studio (I believe Microsoft eventually backed off and fixed the rendering) and with Firefox (fortunately, starting with FF7, you can tell it to use "GDI Classic" mode while keeping hardware acceleration on).

    Yes, because ideal rendering is crappy on low-res (read: what's average today) screen. Pixel snapping was there for a reason.

    DirectWrite still lets you do pixel snapping - that's what "GDI classic" actually means; it's not that GDI is used for rendering, it's that it mimicks the original GDI algorithm. VS was fixed by fixing WPF, which basically exposed the ability to turn on "GDI classic" as a new property you could apply to any control.

  145. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by Dynedain · · Score: 1

    Funny, after years of dealing with cross-platform fonts as a web developer, I've found that thin fonts can look incredible on a Mac and be horrendously pixelated crap on a PC. Helvetica Neue Ultralight comes to mind as a perfect example.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
  146. Re:no user-replaceable parts by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    My statement is not incompatible with yours, you just assumed I limited the scope to the physical. Im well aware of the 'technical' reasons why. It doesnt change my annoyance at the state of affairs.

    --
    Good-bye
  147. Re:2880×1800? More like 1440x900. by jensen404 · · Score: 1

    OS X renders fonts more accurately with the trade-off of less sharpness. The sharpness trade-off doesn't matter as much when you double the PPI.

  148. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    From my point of view, soldered in HDD == tears about data loss when the laptop breaks

    It's an SSD. And if you look at the teardown linked to in TFS, you'll see it's not solder in, it's a daughterboard in a socket.

    The whole thing seems to be a massive fuck you to the types of people that allowed apple to survive between the ][c and the iPod.

    Give over. Those people were so pissed off they were ready to lynch someone at that first MacWorld Jobs went to shortly after he returned to the company. Those people are mostly happy with how Apple improved over the last 15 years. Or at least certainly happier than that period you're talking about. It's Linux, and Android fans on Slashdot that are doing nearly all the complaining. People who would never buy an Apple device regardless, and are mostly clueless as to what they are really like. People for example that are trying to claim the new MacBook Pro has a HDD and it's soldered in.

  149. Just one question by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Does the wireless in this model work?

    We've had so many visitors come by here who have either had their wireless connections randomly drop out (requiring Airport disable/enable) or just altogether not work at all, and they've all had one thing in common - MBP. All others were fine (PC, MacBook Air, netbook, etc).

    Those are recent models too. The 2008 MBPs had decent wireless (IIRC) but were much more likely to cook their GPUs, motherboards or screens. An utter nightmare.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  150. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Trogre · · Score: 1

    Most TV's don't depend on large lithium polymer batteries inside them, do they?

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  151. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Savantissimo · · Score: 1

    And that person was refuted. You can buy higher-density RAM of the same type for 1/3 what Apple is charging.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  152. Re:no user-replaceable parts by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Depends on what you mean by "service". On many brands of laptops adding more ram, replacing the hard drive, or changing the battery doesn't require tearing the laptop apart either.

  153. Re:Could Linux on there skip the "retina" part? by jampola · · Score: 1

    good luck with that since most macs won't boot from an USB stick unless the USB stick has an EFI partition that the macbook likes. I have a MBP 5,1 5,2 and 8,2 and they all refuse to boot from USB, even with rEFIt.

    If you want to see how Ubuntu looks at that res, omgubuntu.co.uk have some screenshots. Needless to say, it looks stupid!

  154. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Zaelath · · Score: 1

    I use HDD as a catch all synonym for "the local mass storage device", but I cede to your pedantry. The soldered in was an error misreading that it was all hardwired like the good old days when Apple used proprietary everything allowing crazy gouging on upgrades/spares (post things like Apple ][ where Woz was actually engineering their own kit)

    I bought an iBook G4, I liked it, until I needed to replace the HDD (omg, do I need to say what the form factor and connection type was or can we just let that go?) which was an incredibly tedious operation involving words I'd never seen before, like "spudge".

    It seems to be mostly the creatives that are complaining about the form of the new MacBook; the Linux/Android crowd are laughing up their sleeves at it like everything else that comes out of Apple, they could care less about the details. The ad hominem just makes you sound like the fanboi you're accusing "us" of being though.

  155. Re:no user-replaceable parts by Wild_dog! · · Score: 1

    Other World computing with have kits for these in no time. They always seem to. ???
    I was going to upgrade one of my machines a few years ago and it was going to cost 800 bucks to max it out. I waited a year and paid less than $130 for the same upgrade at OWC.....then again....

    We may be getting to the end of 3rd party upgrading.... seems like in 10 years there won't be much of that left.

  156. Re:Could Linux on there skip the "retina" part? by James_Duncan8181 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I know. None the less, I have a USB stick that I've previously used on a MB Air.

    --
    "To any truly impartial person, it would be obvious that I am right."
  157. It's not just the specs though. by DiscountBorg(TM) · · Score: 1

    Hardware indeed. It's not even just the specs, it's the quality control. After 15 years of attempting to record and produce music/sound design on PCs, I've had nothing but problems with piss poor hardware, chipsets (making the simple act of recording audio often fraught with difficulty), horrid firewire implementation, and stability. Things that gamers (of which I am one but not exclusively) would never notice. Since buying a Mac, I've never had a problem. Software side, OSX has lots of useful features built right into the OS, like the ability to send MIDI time sync over wifi. There's lots of reasons most of us who create media content end up switching to Mac in the end. My troubleshooting time has dropped to a fraction of what it was when I created content on PCs.

    Actually I take it back. PCs are good. I like PCs because their inferior quality control keepeth me gainfully employed:

    I administer about ~80 PCs (laptops and desktops, HPs, Lenovos and Dells) at my day job (and have been for about 7 years now) We also have about ~30 Macs that are used pretty much every day for media creation. I can unequivocally say that in my experience we've usually had to give away our mac hardware or recycle it once it gets to be about 7-8 years old. It refuses to die. I've lost count of the number of PCs that we've had bizarre hardware problems on right out of the box, and I can't remember the last time we had to send a Mac back for servicing. I'm pretty sure we did once, but it's pretty rare.

    --
    "The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." George Bernard Shaw
  158. Re:no user-replaceable parts by ShakingSpirit · · Score: 1

    Yes exactly, they're a weird 'pentalobe' screw. You *can* buy screwdrivers for them obviously, but they're rare and expensive.

  159. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    I use HDD as a catch all synonym for "the local mass storage device", but I cede to your pedantry....The ad hominem just makes you sound like the fanboi you're accusing "us" of being though.

    Your sole concrete criticism was wrong on both counts. The "ad-hominem" was a precise description of people criticising from a clueless perspective. And the twin references to "toy" made it more than clear.

  160. Re:no user-replaceable parts by the_B0fh · · Score: 1
  161. Re:no user-replaceable parts by the_B0fh · · Score: 1
  162. Laggy screen? by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    I played with the new MBP at the Apple store yesterday. Had the non-Retina Macbook right next to it. Both I put on full-screen mode with the same webpage loaded and quickly scrolled up and down at the same time.

    Non-Retina had no noticeable lag. Retina clearly lagged. Anecdotal for sure, but has anyone tested the pixel response time on the new display? Or perhaps the fill-rate on the new card can't quite keep up with the older one with 1/4 the pixels to push?

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
  163. Re:no user-replaceable parts by synapse7 · · Score: 1

    The TV is an appliance, laptops didn't use to be which is taking some acceptance.

  164. A different paradigm by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Folks, it's become clear from the discussions here that there is a basic misunderstanding between the Mac and non-Mac people. (The people who are straddling the issue have a more realistic perspective, I think.)

    In the Mac world, the battery is considered part of the device, and the rationalization is that you will want to buy the next new shiny device when it comes out anyway, which will surely be before the practical lifetime of the battery in your current device, so the fact that a consumable is not user replaceable is not an issue. Apple marketing tends to promote this mindset and Mac fans who have bought into it will sometimes go to amusing lengths (from the perspective of non-Mac users) to rationalize it.

    In the non-Mac world, batteries tend more to be considered a consumable resource not directly bound to the device itself. The battery is something you expect to replace at some future time when it no longer holds an acceptable charge. There are exceptions, but this is generally the case.

    Apple marketing operates on a "pull" mentality, where the company decides when fans will upgrade, by promoting a culture where the next incremental improvement is a "must have". This takes a special kind of mindshare and Apple has cultivated it brilliantly over the years. You don't see former Samsung customers lining up for the next model Galaxy... well, you do, a little. Perhaps that wasn't the best example. But in general, outside the Apple world, people tend to operate on a "push" mentality, where they replace a device when the current device no longer meets their needs. To people with this mindset, a battery powered device with a non-replaceable battery doesn't make any more sense than a car with the wheels welded on.

    And so, with one side calling a battery replacement an "upgrade" or "repair", it's no wonder that the other side, who considers this action part of regular maintenance, doesn't get it.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  165. Re:no user-replaceable parts by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Donald Norman wrote a book about how computers were moving towards an appliance model 15 years ago. "The Invisible Computer". More recently the term Post-PC seems to be the phrase for it.

    The old PC box with interchangeable components was a thing belonging to an early stage of the technology. It was never going to last.

    In exchange for the loss of tinkerability we get better technology, minaturisation, reliability, better design etc.

    Similar things happened with motorcars, radios, washing machines, power tools. etc.

  166. Re:no user-replaceable parts by the_B0fh · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't have pointed to the cheapest one then. The next one up seems OK:

    http://www.amazon.com/Silverhill-Tools-Pentalobe-Screwdriver-generation/product-reviews/B004IU9EDM/ref=cm_cr_dp_see_all_btm?ie=UTF8&showViewpoints=1&sortBy=bySubmissionDateDescending

    I guess I'm lucky in that i've only had to work with 15" and 17" macbook pros.