Slashdot Mirror


Software Uses Almost 1/2 the Storage On 32GB Surface Tablet

First time accepted submitter jigamo writes "Microsoft's newly released Surface tablets are available in 32 and 64 GB capacities. The company has disclosed how much of that space is available to the user. After taking into account Windows RT, Microsoft Office, built-in apps, and Windows recovery tools, nearly 13 GB of the available space is eliminated from user accessible storage. Microsoft's recommendations for adding additional capacity are to use cloud storage, a memory card, or a USB storage device."

471 comments

  1. Full of microsoft by BluPhenix316 · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Tablet full of Microsoft, whats not to love?

    1. Re:Full of microsoft by Straif · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And how much is it to add an additional 32gb or 64gb to your iPad if you hit your storage limit? $20 or $49 like the Surface or more? Oh wait...

      Not that I have a Surface or any plans to buy one but my guess is that when you build a device that's meant to be essentially a laptop replacement and you also include expansion slots so people who need more memory can buy it off the shelf at any corner store for relatively cheap, preloading it with everything including the kitchen sink doesn't seem like a bad idea.

      Yeah I'm sure a lot of it will go unused but it's not like storage space is going to be an issue for someone with a Surface, unlike an iPad where what you buy is what you have and if you ever want to store that one extra video on your tablet without deleting something it will cost you another $800 investment to get the next model up.

      --
      Of course that's just my opinion...... you could be wrong!
    2. Re:Full of microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cloud!? its the answer to all questions muhahaha

    3. Re:Full of microsoft by Luckyo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Frankly, ipad comparison is hilarious. Surface has the industry standard microSD port. Just put in another 32 gigs. Costs something around 30€ at the moment.

      With ipad, you're SOL.

    4. Re:Full of microsoft by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 0

      I remember an early Mac that came with A/UX (Apple Unix) in the late 80s. It had an 80Mbyte HD, 40 of that was used by the OS. It sounds bad, but if what remains can do useful work then so what?

    5. Re:Full of microsoft by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2

      Frankly, ipad comparison is hilarious. Surface has the industry standard microSD port. Just put in another 32 gigs. Costs something around 30€ at the moment.

      With ipad, you're SOL.

      You can only use that space on the SD card for data. You cannot use it to store apps.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    6. Re:Full of microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Less, actually. You can buy a 32GB Class 10 microSDXC for about $20 USD these days.

    7. Re:Full of microsoft by craigminah · · Score: 2

      "All your data are belong to us."

      XOXO, US Government

    8. Re:Full of microsoft by magarity · · Score: 1

      you also include expansion slots so people who need more memory can buy it off the shelf

      Yes but can you fake out Windows 8 into installing programs on removeable media? It's meant to be a laptop replacement not a media playing widget so don't say to just use the expansion card for music and movies. Can Oracle XE or Java SDK install to the SDXC? Prior versions of Windows do not play well with that kind of thing.

    9. Re:Full of microsoft by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      The iPad can read Word docs out of the box. Were you trying to make a point?

    10. Re:Full of microsoft by sycodon · · Score: 1

      M.S. Software is bloated...who knew?

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    11. Re:Full of microsoft by guttentag · · Score: 1

      ...expansion slots so people who need more memory can buy it off the shelf at any corner store for relatively cheap, preloading it with everything including the kitchen sink doesn't seem like a bad idea.

      Interesting contrast between the Surface and the iPad. With the Surface, the memory can be bought at any corner store, but software is a little hard to come by, so they loaded it up. A kitchen sink full of ugly dishes is always a bad idea.

    12. Re:Full of microsoft by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      that's fine for data files, but having to leave apps at home because they don't fit on the drive is not something that folks that are used to iOS and android are going to expect.

      i agree, having a way to plug in a USB mass storage device is an awesome feature, but i'm not sure it can make up for being low on space in the first place.

    13. Re:Full of microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft shills are earning their money today.

    14. Re:Full of microsoft by elashish14 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You mean to say that it's half-full of Microsoft.

      But as an optimist, I would rather say it's half free of it!

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    15. Re:Full of microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Laptop replacement? The Surface RT being discussed here may come with "Office RT", but it cannot run off-the-shelf Wintel applications.

    16. Re:Full of microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damm right it is full of Microsoft ...

      about ~3-4MB essentials such as kernel, drivers, gui and userland and another 13G of
      spyware, ad networks, crapware such as whatever Microsoft's "iTunes" is, their (already failed)
      appstore, partner-bullshit etc I'm pretty sure you can't delete or even remove from the gui
      for that matter. Fuck this shit, who wants it?

    17. Re:Full of microsoft by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 2

      You'd likely have more than 20GB of apps on a tablet? What the heck are you installing (1000 Angry birds)? Things like Skype, Facebook, Twitter etc are all ~20MB or so sized apps. You already have office with this thing so the big productivity suite install is already included in the space you lost. As well supposedly iOS only takes 1GB on the iPad, so you're comparing 31 to 20GB of useable space. The surface for an extra $20 you can have 52GB of space: though you are a bit limited on the app/data breakdown of how you use it still $1 a GB vs the ~$3 a GB for internal storage for the 64GB model from Apple or MS seems a good deal.

    18. Re:Full of microsoft by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      It had an 80Mbyte HD, 40 of that was used by the OS. It sounds bad, but if what remains can do useful work then so what?

      16GB is 4,000 times as large as 40MB. Both Apple and Android tablets use much much less than 16GB for the OS and essentials. It's an indication that Microsoft had to throw up its hands and simply cram Windows onto it. It's likely that they simply too many interwoven dependencies to permit trimming away the fat.

    19. Re:Full of microsoft by Darby · · Score: 1

      A kitchen sink full of ugly dishes is always a bad idea.

      That's why I have a dishwasher.

    20. Re:Full of microsoft by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1
      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    21. Re:Full of microsoft by Darby · · Score: 1

      For a list of all the reasons why you are wrong fanboi let me send you this Word file to view on your freshly unpacked iPad.

      I'll pass on the viruses, thanks though.

    22. Re:Full of microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Windows RT even have Solitaire and Mahjongg? Because Windows 8 doesn't (by default--you have to get them as Metro "apps" from the app store). If Windows takes up almost half of the Surface computer's total memory, and it doesn't even include Solitaire... as shitty, but classic, of a game that it is... then well, that's just fucking pathetic. It's really no surprise to me though. Microsoft is known for bloat... little functionality, HUGE disk and memory requirements.

      That said, again, I think Solitaire sucks and I don't give a damn about it--but it's practically reached classic status by now as a Windows program, and it would be ironic as hell if Windows takes up that much space and offers even *less* functionality.

    23. Re:Full of microsoft by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      Many games are a gig (or two) a pop. We're talking FPS games, RTS... stuff with lots of hi-res textures and cut-scene video. With regular apps, you're probably right, but gamers are going to want more space.

    24. Re:Full of microsoft by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      preloading it with everything including the kitchen sink doesn't seem like a bad idea.

      What I don't get is I download a 700MB Ubuntu CD and I'd get a full Office suite, photo editing software, e-mail and Web browsing, instant messaging clients, a media player that plays everything, CD burning software, an advanced desktop (okay, Gnome Shell is better, but would also fit so the point is moot--even KDE fits), solitaire, all in about 2-3 gigs installed. How's it Windows takes 20 gigs to install?

    25. Re:Full of microsoft by ifrag · · Score: 2

      Have you seen how big the Metro Solitaire app is? When I checked app disk use it was something over 100MB! Yeah granted it does have a few different game types including freecell, but that disk consumption for just a simple app is absurd. Minesweeper was similarly huge, over 100MB again there.

      Maybe everything is statically linked or something, I just don't see where they managed to burn all that space. Raw bitmap cards maybe? You'd almost have to work to make it that bloated either way.

      --
      Fear is the mind killer.
    26. Re:Full of microsoft by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Games are getting into the multi-gigabyte region now. GTA3 was IIRC 1GB of data, Bard's Tale was about 3GB IIRC. Both for Android, and presumably now high resolution displays are available that will only go up as developers add matching high resolution graphics.

      On Android you can export the app to the SD card though. Even if Surface doesn't support that perhaps you can at least have the app save its data to the card. On an iPad/iPhone you are boned.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    27. Re:Full of microsoft by mlk · · Score: 1

      On Android most big games I've played install the data on the SD card and the only the core game on the device. So you only really need 100-200MB per game.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    28. Re:Full of microsoft by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      That's only because most android devices have a very limited app partition. The data is still going on the internal SD "card".

    29. Re:Full of microsoft by phil_aychio · · Score: 0

      It's likely full of every Window$ feature known to man, which is accessible through an 'Anytime Upgrade'

      --
      obvious redundancy is obvious
    30. Re:Full of microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is trivial to change the sdcard and emmc mount locations. My phone is set to use an external 64GB card as sdcard so everything gets installed there.

    31. Re:Full of microsoft by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

      I saw a talk about WP8 and it could not sure about W8 though. Essentially the external media for the phone version of the OS can have the app data live in a isolated container on the SD or as a common pool of data that you could then use to have apps share amongst themselves. I guess maybe I'm just not much of a gamer but on a tablet I can't see me installing more than 2-3 hi-res games and then a half dozen of the small little ones + a bit of productivity apps. When I really want to game I'd rather use a console or a desktop. I'd be too paranoid with battery life to waste it playing games for any amount of time while travelling to get to where I'm going and have a brick to carry around and/or being that guy looking for an outlet to plug his gadgets into. 10GB would probably be fine given that I'd already have an office suite to start with. The extra 10 would be for a bit of media.

    32. Re:Full of microsoft by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Frankly, ipad comparison is hilarious. Surface has the industry standard microSD port. Just put in another 32 gigs. Costs something around 30€ at the moment.

      With ipad, you're SOL.

      You can only use that space on the SD card for data. You cannot use it to store apps.

      Can you use it to store app data, though? Stuff like static resources, save games, etc.? Seems to me that would be the bulk of an app's size, wouldn't it(?) And if you can, is there a performance lag?

      Haven't had a chance to play with one yet, I've been curious about this...

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    33. Re:Full of microsoft by ReeceTarbert · · Score: 1

      ms fail. for ipad, 32 GB advertised storage = ~29.7 GB available storage (just checked on my ipad)

      Wow! I had no idea the iPad came with a copy of Microsoft Office preinstalled! Also, the available space could be expanded via SD card or external USB storage. What are your options again? ;-)

      RT.

    34. Re:Full of microsoft by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      You'd likely have more than 20GB of apps on a tablet?

      games.

    35. Re:Full of microsoft by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      does it require root? does it require use of the "mount" command? then it's not "trivial" by the definition of any average user.

  2. Considering this is Windows... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    13GB is not bad. I made the mistake of getting a 40gb SSD for my Windows 7 partition. I recently upgraded it to a 120GB one, much better.

    1. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      13GB is not bad.

      Well, it kind of is when you take into account that it's almost half of all the space on the whole device on a 32GB Surface. In practice you're being sold a 16GB tablet when you think you're buying a 32GB one. In comparison my 32GB Android-tablet leaves 28GB free for use and my 16GB phone leaves 13GB free after the OS.

    2. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a 64 gig one. Holds windows and a game of modern size. Windows boots in 6 seconds, the game loads in less than one.

      There's not much else I can ask for. If I want more space I can just get a cheap hd. Its not like I need to store things on the ssd. Its entire purpose is to minimize load times on the programs that need it most, and there aren't many that need more than 64 gigs of space, unless you're, like, a cloud storage facility or something.

    3. Re:Considering this is Windows... by tuppe666 · · Score: 2

      13GB is not bad. I made the mistake of getting a 40gb SSD for my Windows 7 partition. I recently upgraded it to a 120GB one, much better.

      Except its a *Tablet* running a tablet OS, and you can't upgrade the hard drive. Equivelant OS's have a smaller footprint.

    4. Re:Considering this is Windows... by the_y_the · · Score: 0

      Yes, but you are also not getting MS Office, and other in-built apps. I don't know what those other apps are (haven't RTFA), but depending on those, 13GB free space could be very reasonable.

    5. Re:Considering this is Windows... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah but you can just pop in an SDXC mini-SD card for $50 have have another 64GB for music/movies which is what fills a device.

      The 32GB is essentially a system and application drive. And since it's Windows RT I doubt most applications will be larger than 100MB. So from a functional standpoint that leaves space for 20GB * (1000/100) = 200 applications at least. More likely most applications are around 10MB.

    6. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeah but you can just pop in an SDXC mini-SD card for $50 have have another 64GB for music/movies which is what fills a device.

      That's the thing I do not agree with. It's like saying "Hey, we know you bought a 32GB tablet, but we decided to use half of all the space on the tablet so you should go out and buy MORE stuff to make up for the space we use!"

    7. Re:Considering this is Windows... by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In practice you're being sold a 16GB tablet when you think you're buying a 32GB one.

      Maybe you think that's a big deal because a 16 GB iPad costs $100 more than a 32GB one, versus $9.99 to add 16GB to the Surface. And in fact, the add-in card is better, because you easily swap out different cards with different contents. I have a MicroSD with my entire music collection for my Sansa Clip+, and might want to pop it into a tablet without waiting for a 20GB file copy.

    8. Re:Considering this is Windows... by ludomancer · · Score: 1

      No. Even considering that this is windows, it is still *extremely* bad.
      This is indicative of the same bloat and indiscretion for efficiency that has caused every MS GUI OS to plummet into user-hindrance after NT.

      It's trite-ware; full of shit that no majority needs, but the MS handicap has convinced itself it must employ in order to reach every conceivable userbase desire conceivable, no matter how miniscule. If competition has it, so must they, only a fraction as good and double the footprint.

      Including all the pitfalls, bloat and bugs that come from such a development philosophy, It is THE trademark reason Microsoft has been failing the user for >10 years.

      And no, I don't have an alternative solution aside from "stick with older MS platforms for as long as humanly possible, and don't pay them for anything for as long as you can avoid it".

    9. Re:Considering this is Windows... by frosty_tsm · · Score: 1

      13GB is not bad. I made the mistake of getting a 40gb SSD for my Windows 7 partition. I recently upgraded it to a 120GB one, much better.

      I know what you're getting at, but that's only a win if the user accepts the fact that MS clumsily ported their desktop OS. To compare with Apple, both take roughly the same amount of hard drive space (give or take 5 or 10 GB, but same order of magnitude). When Apple developed the iOS, they stripped out a ton of the bulk to make it around a gig or so. I can't imagine that Windows needs that much code; it's just being half-assed.

    10. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call it an equivalent. If the surface has a fully loaded MSOffice then there is not a tablet out there that can compare to what it will do for businesses. I've used apple, android, rim, but not MS. They all suck for documents.

    11. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Except its a *Tablet* running a tablet OS, and you can't upgrade the hard drive.

      Actually, not really - it's basically running Windows 8 for ARM. Also, unlike the iPad you can add an SD card.

      Still pretty absurd, though. And I guess it explains why they didn't release a 16GB version!

    12. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Grandma does not accept your answer. Grandma does not understand what the hell you're talking about on any level, and she loses those nasty little cards you're recommending her, which means she loses everything she had on there. Grandma will happily stay with her laptop/iPad that at least she has gotten used to now and doesn't have to deal with some technical mumbo-jumbo that doesn't make any sense to her...

    13. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Synerg1y · · Score: 2

      It's a bit more for one that doesn't lag while presenting here said movies and music.

    14. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That was actually the way smartphones of old worked, and it's a FAR more customer-friendly approach. "We give you a smallish system drive and a functional expansion slot so you can buy as much as you need".

      Considering microSD prices and the product, this is going to be a deal breaker for no one.

    15. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You're badly misinformed. This isn't a "form over function" tablet, where you can't. This is a function and form, where you in fact can upgrade the hard drive. Though in mobile devices, we called these "microSD cards" since... well nokia n95 or so?

    16. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      13GB is not bad.

      Well, it kind of is when you take into account that it's almost half of all the space on the whole device on a 32GB Surface. In practice you're being sold a 16GB tablet when you think you're buying a 32GB one. In comparison my 32GB Android-tablet leaves 28GB free for use and my 16GB phone leaves 13GB free after the OS.

      Which Android tablet comes with and can run Microsoft Office?

    17. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they are not forcing customers to buy douchey docking connectors.

    18. Re:Considering this is Windows... by ranpel · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, are you attempting to justify 16 fucking gigabytes swoofed off of your purchased 32GB for microsoft fucking office? How about: Which android tablet can't run an office application whose installation takes 500MB? None? That's better. Microsoft office. Please, like it's 1995.

      --
      \r
    19. Re:Considering this is Windows... by gtall · · Score: 1

      errr..think content, such as music, movies, etc.

    20. Re:Considering this is Windows... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      And WTF do I need Office on a tablet for? That's why my notebook and PC are for, and in a pinch my netbook. As long as I can view Office documents and write out the odd note, I can't imagine any reason at all that I would want to use my tablet for that purpose.

      You're killer feature is a killer feature in great want of a purpose. Typical Microsoft. If they built a car, they'd put wings and a propeller on it. "But it won't fly a tenth as good as a real airplane." "It doesn't matter. It's got fucking wings. It's sooooo much better than the competitors car. Buy Microsoft, buy wings!!!!!"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    21. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And WTF do I need Office on a tablet for? That's why my notebook and PC are for, and in a pinch my netbook. As long as I can view Office documents and write out the odd note, I can't imagine any reason at all that I would want to use my tablet for that purpose.

      So let's see...you can't uninstall it then, if you don't want it? I would be much surprised if it wasn't removable.

      You're killer feature is a killer feature in great want of a purpose. Typical Microsoft. If they built a car, they'd put wings and a propeller on it. "But it won't fly a tenth as good as a real airplane." "It doesn't matter. It's got fucking wings. It's sooooo much better than the competitors car. Buy Microsoft, buy wings!!!!!"

      You're a typical navel-gazer, because you don't want something, you never understand that OTHER people do. I bet you went and told the first person to build a car with an automatic transmission or a radio or even child seat braces that they were just RUINING the car.

    22. Re:Considering this is Windows... by MightyMartian · · Score: 2

      I'm thinking the problem will soon become apparent. Microsoft doesn't know what tablets are for, and thus is trying to turn tablets into notebooks.

      I can buy a notebook that will kick Surface's ass from here to next Tuesday, with storage like ten times as great, far better horsepower and a much more usable Office for less than Surface.

      Again, Microsoft is trying to up an iPad in the same that adding wings to car would be trying to get one up on a Chevy.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    23. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1, Funny

      Maybe you think that's a big deal because a 16 GB iPad costs $100 more than a 32GB one, versus $9.99 to add 16GB to the Surface

      No, I don't. I don't give a flying f*ck about how much an iPad costs. I'd say the same thing about them if iOS used half of all the storage space on the device.

    24. Re:Considering this is Windows... by tepples · · Score: 2

      errr..think content, such as music, movies, etc.

      You appear to mean only noninteractive content. As I understand it, anything interactive, such as a game, will have to be installed to the application partition.

    25. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Dracos · · Score: 1

      If they built a car, they'd put wings and a propeller on it.

      No, because that would be innovation. If MS built a car, it would have the steering wheel on the roof, pentagonal tires, the hood welded shut, and would operate best on MicroSoft Roads(TM) fueled by MicroSoft Gas(TM).

      And as of a couple weeks ago, it would start up as a Little Tykes vehicle and you'd have to switch it to real car mode to go anywhere.

    26. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Like Windows Phone 7. You could plug in an SD card for more space. Oh, except then you can no longer remove it because files are split across the internal drive and the SD.

    27. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting wings on a car? It worked for Richard Petty in his Dodge.

      You keep pushing that metaphor, but the fact is, people LOVE the idea of flying cars.

      In any case, I remember when people poo-pahed the very idea of Tablets. They were saying that notebooks could kick their asses.

      Yet Tablets are wildy popular despite their lack of punch to a notebook.
       

    28. Re:Considering this is Windows... by terjeber · · Score: 1

      And WTF do I need Office on a tablet for? That's why my notebook and PC

      So, why would you be lugging all those things around with you? The surface does everything the typical office worker needs to do. It has Word, Excel, PP, Mail, browser. Unless you are a developer, the Surface can probably service all your PC needs. So why lug an extra laptop around?

    29. Re:Considering this is Windows... by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Apps range in size drastically, from a handful of KB up to many hundreds of megs (I haven't seen any over a gig yet, but I expect they exist already or will soon). Remember that this OS supports full DirectX for gaming, and unless the game developers choose to downsample all their high-res textures or something, the RT version will be close to the same size as the x86 and x64 versions (the only difference being the size of the compiled binaries).

      On the other hand, the Surface also supports doing stuff like mounting removable storage into the root filesystem, or creating symlinks to removable or network drives. If you want to expand the available storage, even for apps (which is not officially supported), that's possible with a bit of effort.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    30. Re:Considering this is Windows... by terjeber · · Score: 2

      I can buy a notebook that will kick Surface's ass from here to next Tuesday, with storage like ten times as great, far better horsepower

      The average person works in email, browser and office. So, why does he need something that will kick Surface's ass? He doesn't do video editing in Premiere Pro, so what would he need the extra power for? The Surface does everything he needs to do and it does it fast and with no delays.

      much more usable Office

      So you have a much more usable Office than Office? Where?

    31. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is the winsxs folder still there? If so, could that not be an issue?

    32. Re:Considering this is Windows... by vakuona · · Score: 1

      No, it's a FAR more geek-friendly approach.

      Regular users just want something with reasonable storage space, and don't buy additional storage space. Even when they have micro-SD car slots on their devices, buyers of Android phones do not buy additional storage space.

    33. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 2

      The only way Microsoft could enter the tablet market this late and possibly succeed is to offer something nobody else can offer and that some people (think they) need. Namely MSOffice. They probably did a quick and dirty port to WIN32 on ARM (y'know, the API that dare not speak its name, but remains the basis for Microsoft's monopolies). So the huge multi-gigabyte app designed for desktops and laptops with hundreds of gigabytes gets shoved onto the Surface.

      As many have said, it's not that bad, since you can buy an SD card, etc. But they're kind of bastardizing what a tablet is and is for by doing this. A tablet (post Kindle fire, at least) is a cheap data consumption device. A notebook is a small desktop computer. They used to be quite different, but Microsoft's approach to hybridizing them is removing the biggest plus of tablets (cheap and simple) without really offering the biggest plus of notebooks (full featured and keyboard-bassed). It's not a bad device, and lots of people will shell out for it, but it's no stocking-stuffer either.

      There are some parallels with netbooks here. Nimble, cheap competition crops up, and Microsoft kills it with a loss leader that 'can run all your Windows apps'. It's not quite the same, because this thing can't run all your windows apps. But it apparently can run MSOffice. I don't know whether it's a loss leader or not. It could be intended to limit the ARM tablet threat to the more profitable Intel tablet and desktop market. Who knows. But Microsoft had to do something to stay relevant. Personally,. I'd prefer a cheap, light Nexus 7 on my coffee table or backpack and my desktop system on the desk where it belongs...

      --
      Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    34. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Lokitoth · · Score: 1

      Given the chipsets announced RT devices run on, I would guess that all of the textures *are* going to be downsampled, especially compared to the x86/x64 versions. Same as for console ports.

    35. Re:Considering this is Windows... by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      iOS has no system management tools, no scripting support, no filesystem browser, no developer tools in the browser, no Flash player, no... lots of other things (which Surface has). I think Apple stripped out too much for a real tablet OS, personally. It also basically only has one on-screen keyboard configuration, and no handwriting recognition. It only includes the runtime for one compiled language, plus JavaScript; Surface supports multiple languages including a JS engine that offers far more system APIs than a simple WebView in an app. Most importantly though, both in terms of differences in what you can do with them and in terms of what takes up so much space, the iPad doesn't support USB peripherals. The Surface not only does, it ships with gigabytes of drivers for them (over 100k devices supported at launch, according to MS, although many can probably just use common "class" drivers such as USB Mass Storage).

      All those drivers, plus the 3600 MB devoted to the recovery volume that allows Surface to reset or repair itself, even in the face of catastrophes like loss of the decryption key for the entire OS volume or running out of battery during an OS update, plus Office (which is hardly a lightweight program suite, but is far more powerful than any equivalent for the iPad), explains the size usage.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    36. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My though exactly. Because that means in one year it will at least 20 GB, not just 13 GB for the system, and another year after probably another 5 GB.

    37. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone remembe the Commodore 64?

      Bam! 38,911 bytes free... That's from memory, pun intended.

    38. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Lokitoth · · Score: 1

      Luckily Grandma has grandson who gets the nasty little card, puts it into the surface, mounts it into C: and sets up Grandma's surface so that she does not need to worry about it and has 32 GB or 64 GB for her documents, music, pictures and videos. - using the Libraries functionality. And the best part is, when she upgrades to a new surface or other Windows tablet, just move the card over, remount and update the Libraries location and like magic all her content is already there. Grandma never need worry about removing it.

      Obviously will not work for applications, but with most data being stored on a different volume, this setup should work out fairly well. Actually, what I would like to see is a wizard for doing this. Obviously the idea here is to avoid having to remove the card.

      With all that said, I am fairly curious what takes up 13GB in the RT install, that seems excessive.

    39. Re:Considering this is Windows... by antek9 · · Score: 1

      13GB is bad enough because that is the OS footprint even *before* the /winsxs/ folder starts going berserk, assuming there is such a thing within the RT version as well. It should be avoidable, though. Apps don't hook so deeply into the system that you would need to cache all drivers and file versions all the time. But considering Microsoft's track record, I'd wager 64GB to be the absolute minimum.

      --
      A World in a Grain of Sand / Heaven in a Wild Flower,
      Infinity in the Palm of your Hand / And Eternity in an Hour.
    40. Re:Considering this is Windows... by timeOday · · Score: 2

      We are talking about AT MOST an issue of $10 on a $699 product here. (I say "at most" because there's no way the Surface could use 0 MB of built-in storage for its OS and applications.) So how does caring about this make any sense? It's like complaining that a new digital camera can only hold 3 pictures in its built-in storage.

    41. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people probably already have several microSD cards laying around.

      You don't understand the simple convenience of being able to pull the card out of my camera, mp3 player or Dingoo (which contains my game ROMs) and popping it into my phone, tablet or PC to instantly have access to that data.

    42. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Lokitoth · · Score: 1

      That particular myth has been debunked a bunch of times, but here goes again.

      WinSxS is the least understood component in Windows. For the most part it contains hard links (not symbolic links, which Windows Explorer understands do not occupy space) to other places on the system. See here (http://www.davidlenihan.com/2008/11/winsxs_disk_space_usage_its_no.html)

    43. Re:Considering this is Windows... by babyrat · · Score: 1

      All my non-geeky friends have micros sd cards in their android phones - when they buy a phone, the sales persons says they need it and they get it. And the sales person is mostly truthful for a change.

    44. Re:Considering this is Windows... by zieroh · · Score: 1

      mounts it into C:

      Didn't you just commit the equivalent of Godwining the thread?

      Yeah, I think you did.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    45. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows used to come on 17 x 1.4MB floppies. What the fuck needs 13GB?

    46. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      iOS apps can be a mix of C, C++, and Objective-C. I don't think it has only one runtime. And what exactly does Windows RT come with? C, C++, .Net and what?

    47. Re:Considering this is Windows... by chinakow · · Score: 1

      Neither does that cure woman at the gym or your family. YOU understand it but it is all magic and confusion to normal people.

    48. Re:Considering this is Windows... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Kingsoft Office for Android is a 12Mb download...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    49. Re:Considering this is Windows... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Why use Microsoft Office on a tablet?

      Kingsoft, Polaris and many other Office suites are available for Android. Being tablet optimised, they work well on the tablet form-factor.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    50. Re:Considering this is Windows... by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      And Grandma won't fill up what's left of the original 32GB anyway so she won't give a shit. The idea that things "fill up" and that you might need to have an extra container to put stuff in isn't exactly difficult to grasp or something that's unique to technology; if Grandma can't figure that out she's probably a moron.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    51. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Camera microSD = pictures
      MP3 player microSD = music
      Dingoo/handheld microSD = games
      eBook microSD = books

      Anyone who isn't a complete retard can understand that, which I guess that leaves out Apple customers.

    52. Re:Considering this is Windows... by farble1670 · · Score: 2

      And WTF do I need Office on a tablet for? That's why my notebook and PC are for, and in a pinch my netbook. As long as I can view Office documents and write out the odd note, I can't imagine any reason at all that I would want to use my tablet for that purpose.

      if you look at the windows 8 offerings, many are convertible tablets that doc into keyboards. MSFT is trying to blur the lines between a tablet and a laptop ... and get people to replace their laptops with convertible tablets.

      it's a good idea and you have to give some credit to them for trying something different, but i don't think the tech is there yet. folks aren't going to pay $800 for a tablet that's slower than the laptop they bought 3 years ago and has a tenth of the storage.

    53. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep. and this is just the bait..

    54. Re:Considering this is Windows... by slomike1 · · Score: 1

      You are also getting MS Offce as part of the OS pre-install

    55. Re:Considering this is Windows... by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      I tend to side with Google on most things, but even they are not above charging an extra $100 when it only costs them about $10 to double the storage (see the Nexus 10). I don't really store that much data on me Nexus, so it doesn't bother me that much, but it's still one of those things that pisses me off on principle.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    56. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Idbar · · Score: 1

      Not that it's great, but on my surface I can plug any usb flash drive, and works like a charm. I can also use that usb port to charge my phone if I want to, no adapters needed.

    57. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Because no third party app that translates Office formats or opens them does so with complete accuracy. If you depend on the more advanced features of MS Office (things other than text processing), then anything less than the real MS Office is a frustrating compromise.

    58. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Microsoft is marketing the Surface as something more than a tablet. It is a hybrid of tablet and ultra book, hence it is made for people like myself who really need more than what a tablet can do (I have an iPad) but don't really want to se a laptop unless I just happen to want to. This is why the keyboard cover is so much a part of the Surface "experience".

    59. Re:Considering this is Windows... by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      And if you don't want Office? You're forced to sacrifice space for it, and presumably you probably were forced to pay for it as well...

    60. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah that was something I faced recently.

      Look at turning off things like system restore, the page file and reduce recycle bin size to get most of your SSD back.

    61. Re:Considering this is Windows... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Then to put it bluntly, buy a damn Android device and stop bitching. If you don't want Windows apps then you won't be buying a Windows tablet and you won't be bitching about the space those apps consume.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    62. Re:Considering this is Windows... by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      Wrong. SD card storage can not be accessed the same way as internal storage. You don't run apps from a removable drive, so its not $10 for the same thing. Try again.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    63. Re:Considering this is Windows... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      So format lockin is the main reason for using MS Office? And if that's not a problem for me, I'm fine?

      Good to know, thanks.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    64. Re:Considering this is Windows... by timeOday · · Score: 2
      The low-ed Surface has 32 GB whereas the low-end iPad has only 16. So write off the entire 16 GB used by preinstalled apps, and it's still ahead.

      That said, I just read Farhad Manjoo's review of the Surface, and I don't think the amount of memory matters for other reasons... namely that the Surface is a sluggish, buggy faux-pc that also isn't any better for "real work" than the iPad. In particular, MS Office on the Surface sux. Pity.

    65. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you think that's a big deal because a 16 GB iPad costs $100 more than a 32GB one, versus $9.99 to add 16GB to the Surface

      No, I don't. I don't give a flying f*ck about how much an iPad costs. I'd say the same thing about them if iOS used half of all the storage space on the device.

      People have been advertising the total storage capacity, as opposed to the available storage space, since the first hard drives hit the market back in the early 90's. So your complaint seems to be about how much space is used out of the total available, and when you can double your capacity for a few measly bucks it really makes you come across as nothing but a bit of a whiner.

    66. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Robert+Zenz · · Score: 0

      Yeah but you can just pop in an SDXC mini-SD card for $50 have have another 64GB for music/movies which is what fills a device.

      See, that's exactly what's wrong with the Microsoft-Ecosystem. "Well your PC is slow, just pop in another 4GiB of RAM, it's cheap! ... Sound stutters? Just pop in a real soundcard, it's under $ 100! Something is wrong and you don't know what? Just reinstall the thing, will take you some days but better then weeks of searching! You want this bug fixed? WHY would you want that if you can work around it!"

    67. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and that's why I can't buy a Google Nexus device. No external storage. WTF, Google?

    68. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Builder · · Score: 1

      And that's great and all - but it still claims reported space in explorer, stopping me from using that space.

    69. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Windows phones 7's handling of it was idiotic, in fact probably almost as bad as ios and definitely much worse then android. Don't think anyone is going to deny that. They used microSD as some sort of weird system drive with its own formatting and all and on most phones it wasn't really removable, it was just a way for them to save costs on making phones by inserting cheap non-customized memory card as system drive.

    70. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Lokitoth · · Score: 1

      You are missing the point. If you have a harddrive sized 20Gb, make a folder A/ in it, make a folder B/ in it, and add a hard link inside B to A, then fill A up with 20GB, then look at the sized of both A and B, explorer will show they are each 20GB, for a "total" of 40GB on your 20GB disk. It is not preventing you from using anything because the disk is full warning comes from NTFS's block allocator, which works on a lower level than hark links.

    71. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Lokitoth · · Score: 1

      How did I Godwin the thread? Add a reparse point and stick the new volume into C:\TheSDCard or similar. Am I expecting grandma to do it? No. Am I the one who sets everything up for Grandma anyways, whether it is an iPad or a Windows box? Yes.

    72. Re:Considering this is Windows... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have 80GB on my Ubuntu system for (most of) home and for the root and usr, and an old 320GB with other stuff (opt, some stuff linked into my home...) It's a little cramped, I have to think ahead to how big a file is going to be sometimes. But I could afford it...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    73. Re:Considering this is Windows... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Loading advanced MSOffice files into LibreOffice is terrifying in some cases, in others it somehow just works and I'm not exactly sure why it works. On the other hand, creating documents ... I keep finding MSOffice severely lacking, difficult to use, etc, and I actually took OFAD classes in college where they taught us specifically how to use MSOffice (this is why I make all my documents with styles and use spacing and page breaks to accomplish everything instead of just hitting enter a bunch of times and bluntly applying fonts).

      It's strange because LibreOffice is a piece of shit. MSOffice is WORSE.

    74. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it isn't. A class 6 card is all you need and a class 10 is, at most, ten bucks more than that.

    75. Re:Considering this is Windows... by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      http://www.kingsoftstore.com/windows/paragraph-adjustment.html

      Manually adjusting individual paragraphs is a nightmare. A style-based approach is a hell of a lot faster and more visually consistent (you should see the documents that get passed around most offices; often they don't have the same formatting throughout, and when people try to change stuff they scroll through 40 or 50 pages looking at individual elements and applying/removing bold and changing font sizes--sometimes 14-16 instead of all 14 or all 16, sometimes wrong font). Valuable time indeed.

    76. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Farhad Manjoo is a fucking Apple shill. I doubt he even used the Surface for more than five minutes.

      A fair and unbiased Surface review: www.youtube.com/watch?v=yal8m1vgT8U

      I see none of the "problems" that Man-Goo fabricated.

    77. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, bitching about bitching. you go girl!

    78. Re:Considering this is Windows... by Duggeek · · Score: 1

      [...]

      That said, I just wholeheartedly believed Farhad Manjoo's highly opinionated review of the Surface, and I don't think[sic] ... here's the stuff that the guy said... namely that the Surface is a sluggish, buggy faux-pc that also isn't any better for "real work" than the iPad. In particular, MS Office on the Surface sux because apparently it's cool to both hate on MSFT and misspell things here. Pity.

      FTFY

      Yes, indeed. It is a pity.

      --
      This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
    79. Re:Considering this is Windows... by zieroh · · Score: 1

      Am I expecting grandma to do it? No. Am I the one who sets everything up for Grandma anyways, whether it is an iPad or a Windows box? Yes.

      That kind of thinking is what keeps otherwise good products from being considered mass market. It's the kind of thinking that makes linux a nonstarter on the desktop, too. If you had any sense at all, you would realize what a completely stupid attitude that is.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
  3. 32 gig sd card is cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least they give you that option.

    USB thumb drives I personally find handy, I tend to keep a 64 gig thumbdrive filled with movies, swap it between my android tablet, media center pc, laptop, or what have you, rather than having to replicate the file out endless times.

    Cloud storage is no good in Canada, where uncapped internet doesn't really exist, and mobile plans are absolute garbage.

    1. Re:32 gig sd card is cheap by ArcadeMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And don't forget to say that cloud storage is no good in Canada, where uncapped internet doesn't really exist, and mobile plans are absolute garbage.

      Yes, it's so bad that it's worth mentioning twice.

    2. Re:32 gig sd card is cheap by Stewie241 · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are options if you want unlimited Internet in Canada. Fewer or greater depending on where you live. They do tend not to be the mainstream carriers though. Fortunately, I happen to live in a small area serviced by a cable provider that offers unlimited.

    3. Re:32 gig sd card is cheap by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Canada doesn't have wifi? Surface RT doesn't have a sim slot so mobile plans shouldn't come into play.

    4. Re:32 gig sd card is cheap by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

      Around here 99.9% of people lock their Wi-Fi, because of the monthly caps.

      Yes, cable/DSL has monthly caps too, sometimes not even 50GB monthly. Netflix Canada even had to add another quality setting so that people wouldn't go through their caps too quickly.

    5. Re:32 gig sd card is cheap by Phil+Urich · · Score: 1

      Wait, what? My Telus DSL line has no cap whatsoever; my cell service with Wind has a soft-cap at 5GB (ie. no extra charges, but traffic is de-prioritized). I guess I'm just living in a bubble with exceptional no-longer-offered plans . . . or maybe most people don't try hard enough to find a decent plan. Okay, fair enough.

      P.S. I think most people lock their wifi because they think that 'damn thiefs' are why their youtubes are so slow. Ironically though it's only recently that I've seen WEP starting to disappear . . . only to be replaced by WiFi Protected Setup networks, which in many respects are even *less* secure. Now, I doubt you're going to have injection-capable drivers on a Microsoft tablet, but you'd better believe I'd take advantage of that if I didn't just have a $35 unlimited data plan for my cell anyways. Hell, I've used it a few times since Google annoyingly locked non-Infrastructure-mode networking out of Android, so my Nexus 7 could never connect to my cellphone, but I'm starting to ramble now.

      Point is, things aren't *so* bad. Hell, having broken my N7 by tripping over my roommate's cat, I'm tempted to get one of the new HSPA+ Nexus 7s, and just pay the $35 for a mobile data plan with a 10GB-down soft-cap. That'd put me at 5GB soft on my phone, 10GB soft on my tablet, and unlimited on my (admittedly only 700KBps in practice) DSL line. In principle the telecommunications industry here in Canada is atrocious, but in practice I don't have anything directly to complain about.

      --
      I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
    6. Re:32 gig sd card is cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... I happen to live in a small area serviced by a cable provider that offers unlimited.

      Wow! you get cable 4G!!! Give me some of that!

  4. 13GB? by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It seems ridiculous to me that 13GB is taken by the OS and built-in software.

    How does that compare to iOS? And to be fair, how does that compare to iOS+Pages+Keynote+Numbers?

    1. Re:13GB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, iOS 6 currently clocks in around 760-800 megs. My iWork '08 folder comes in at just under 720 megs. So in that respect Windows RT is beyond bloated.

    2. Re:13GB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How does that compare to iOS? And to be fair, how does that compare to iOS+Pages+Keynote+Numbers?

      On my iPad2, 32gb: about 3.4gb is allocated to OS, leaving me 28.6gb. The three apps together total 772MB.

      So 4.2gb or so, give or take. YMMV.

    3. Re:13GB? by godawful · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just checked my 16GB iPhone 5 running iOS 6.0.1, 13.47 gigs of available space.

      --
      Live EVERY week... Like it's Shark Week
    4. Re:13GB? by guttentag · · Score: 4, Informative

      iOS reserves 1.5GB for the system partition, and OS uses 800 MB of that. (see paragraph four)

      When the retina iPad was introduced, Pages went from 95MB to 269MB, and Numbers went from 109MB to 283MB.

      Keynote currently clocks in at 286MB.

      Realistically, that means the OS and productivity suite (if you need the whole thing... most people will have no use for Keynote unless they're actually giving presentations) are taking 2.3GB away from your usable space. That's 14% on a 16GB iPad, 7% on a 32GB, or roughly 4% of a 64GB model.

      With Windows NT, the NT stood for New Technology. Perhaps the RT in Windows RT stands for Retaining-water Technology.

    5. Re:13GB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure it stands for Raging Twat.

    6. Re:13GB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now add in your linkedin app, facebook app, scientific calculator app, picture crap, an extra (real) browser, flash, a remote desktop client, a SMB client, a FTP client, a scripting engine (similar to powershell), paint, notepad, etc. How much space is ios taking then?

      It's not like it's all files filled with zeros, almost the entirety of the Win8 app base is there in WinRT, including powershell, group policy editors, drivers, mmc snap ins, etc. Comparing iOS to WinRT is like comparing a paring knife to a box of swiss army knives.

      And before you start bitching about 'My tablet doesn't need all that crap', everyone knows you'd just claim 'WinRT was gimped and didn't have anything installed and it's terribad' if it was stripped of all the programs to make it smaller. Sure as hell can't make you damn slashdot kids happy with anything...

    7. Re:13GB? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      That is less than I would expect from a computer install of these products.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    8. Re:13GB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now add in your linkedin app, facebook app, scientific calculator app, picture crap, an extra (real) browser, flash, a remote desktop client, a SMB client, a FTP client, a scripting engine (similar to powershell), paint, notepad, etc. How much space is ios taking then?

      Facebook, 53.4MB. LinkedIn, 28.9MB. m48 app (HP48 scientific calculator emulator), 4.8MB. Picture viewer, 0MB (included). VNC client, 1.3MB. FTP, 2.2MB (cloud reader). Paint, 744KB (Scribble Lite). Notepad, 4.8MB (iNote). That adds up to a grand total of 96MB, about half of which is the bloated Facebook app. I do not happen to have an alternate browser or an SMB client on my iPhone, but I doubt they would require more than 50MB each.

      So, ignoring your attempt to troll with PowerShell and Flash, the "add ins" you demand will add less than 200MB to iOS if installed by default. So why are we putting up with this 13GB crap again?

    9. Re:13GB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS is a single function mobile operating system. Windows 8/RT is a full, multi-purpose operating system.

    10. Re:13GB? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      My system partition on FC17 w/KDE4.x is 7GB. Dafuqniggawha' are they doing?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  5. Almost half by tbird81 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    "Nearly 13"/32 = nearly 40%.
    "Nearly 13"/64= nearly 20%.

    Almost half. Sure, no exaggeration detected at all. And then you can add a memory card if over 19GB isn't enough for everybody.

    1. Re:Almost half by kinadian · · Score: 2

      It does say almost half on a 32GB tablet. I don't know about your world but 40% is almost half in mine.

    2. Re:Almost half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you can add a memory card if over 19GB isn't enough for everybody.

      Do you prefer to keep your installed application on removable media, or on your hard drive?

    3. Re:Almost half by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      As opposed to a 64gig Android tablet where approx 3.1% is OS.

      20% vs 3%? Thats bloody bloat.

    4. Re:Almost half by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You can't install Windows Store applications on a removable drive.

  6. Microsoft Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, so you're accounting for what is likely to be the largest single software install (as in storage) available for the unit outside of the OS. What is it without the Office package?

    1. Re:Microsoft Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A paperweight.

    2. Re:Microsoft Office by The1stImmortal · · Score: 2

      Actually you're probably on the money here. It's all Offices' fault.

      Why?

      Because the only reason the desktop stack exists on Windows RT is to support Office, because the Office team couldn't get their sh.. together fast enough to natively metro-ize Office (alternatively, because they couldn't think of a sane way to natively metro-ize Office. Take your pick)

      So that means along with all the Metro UI stuff, they now have to lug along a full explorer & shell32 desktop environment and supporting apps, just to make one app work. If you dropped office and everything needed to support only Office from RT, I suspect you'd easily cut that 13GB figure in half, if not more.

      (Yes, technically office is several apps, but given it's a bundle and a "feature" in its own right, it might as well be considered one app from a product point of view)

    3. Re:Microsoft Office by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Sure sounds like a Windows product.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Microsoft Office by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod. parent. UP!

    5. Re:Microsoft Office by bazorg · · Score: 1

      What is it without the Office package?

      I don't know... is it possible to delete it for those who really want to maximise the free storage on their Surface tablet?

  7. Registry Editor by Rosyna · · Score: 0

    Why does a tablet need a file system browser, a registry editor, DirectX diagnostic tools, notepad, or a command prompt?

    All those really exist in Windows RT on the Surface. They don't need to be there. It's supposed to be a freakin tablet. They could have made a lot more space available by removing a lot of these types of things.

    1. Re:Registry Editor by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's supposed to be a freakin tablet.

      Which is a freakin' computer running a freakin' operating system.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Registry Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because One Size fits Most ...at least in Microsoft land.

    3. Re:Registry Editor by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      My android phone has 3 of those.
      A file system browser is always handy, and so it notepad. If you actually want to do useful work a command prompt can be damn handy.

      These types of things take up very little space, Office is likely what is taking up all the space.

    4. Re:Registry Editor by doti · · Score: 2

      because you might need them when things break.

      it's windows.

      also, my android phone have a file system browser, a notepad, and a command prompt, and they take waaaaay less space

      --
      factor 966971: 966971
    5. Re:Registry Editor by p0p0 · · Score: 1

      None of those things would have made any free space at all and would simply detract from functionality. They want your Tablet/PC experiences to be relatively similar and streamlined.

      Registry is part of Windows and an editor would be a good idea. Why wouldn't you need a file system browser? I have one on Android for managing files, Android (and I believe jailbroken iPhones) have a terminal, Notepad is another popular app that many tablet users download. The only thing I can see as unnecessary is the DirectX Diagnostics, but they do intend for you to develop on the tablet also, so that may be why it stayed.

      None of these things are really necessary, but many tablet users download similar apps to them anyway. They really don't take up precious space either so that point is rather moot.

    6. Re:Registry Editor by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      None of those tools take up a significant amount of space. You can remove them if you WANT to, but their usefulness far outweighs that.

      Plus, the command prompt is needed if you want to run batch files. Some installers, even modern ones, do. And for workplaces, IT will likely have a bunch of logon scripts written that may rely on it.

      Registry Editor, as well as most of the tools you named, would probably be more likely used by IT to try to diagnose problems with a device. Without it you can still use reg.exe to apply tweaks you find on the internet or whatever but it is not suitable for general registry browsing.

      DirectX Diagnostic Tools is used by many game company support teams in order to get a profile of your system from you. It definitely should stay.

      Notepad is a basic notepad, and is the default association of .txt and .log files. I shouldn't have to go into why this app should be included.

      But let's see how much space you could save. Notepad is 200kb on Windows 7, and there are two copies. So 400kb. Regedit is ~450kb. Dxdiag is 350kb, as is cmd.exe. Congrats, you saved less than 2mb. Most of the support files are shared by other applications so you couldn't really increase this figure by much. I will be generous and say 10mb, which is still not significant enough to cut away the usefulness and compatibility (in the case of Command Prompt).

      You can certainly cut out big chunks of the OS on the desktop (see: nLite, vLite) but it is likely MS has already done a LOT of this just to get it down to 13gb while still including all features the consumer would expect to see.

    7. Re:Registry Editor by Xeleema · · Score: 0

      You take that back this instant, Mister! My tablet needs a command-prompt so bad I can TASTE it.

      --
      "When I am king, you will be first against the wall..."
    8. Re:Registry Editor by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Why does a tablet need a file system browser, a registry editor, DirectX diagnostic tools, notepad, or a command prompt?

      My guess is that no matter how much they polish it up to make it all tablet-ey -- underneath, it's still Windows, which has all the same crap as any other Windows, and you'll need this stuff to make work.

      It sounds like they haven't made anything which lives in a smaller footprint.

      Of course, Microsoft will say they needed that much space to cram in the awesomeness. Me, I'm just going to call it bloat they couldn't pare down.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Registry Editor by ericloewe · · Score: 2

      Notepad: 189KB
      dxdiag: 336KB
      regedit: 10KB
      cmd: 337KB

      total: 872KB

    10. Re:Registry Editor by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Why doesn't a tablet need a file system browser? Are you not going to put any files on it?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    11. Re:Registry Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because you might need them when things break.

      it's windows.

      also, my android phone have a file system browser, a notepad, and a command prompt, and they take waaaaay less space

      ....which is saying a lot--because they're written in Java.

    12. Re:Registry Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's supposed to be a freakin tablet.

      Why does tablet have to mean a crippled computer where you can only do a subset of what you can do on a real computer?

      It should be a form-factor and a user interface to suit - not a dumbed down system that limits what you can do that makes it essentially only useful for reading web pages, email and playing games.

      Sure that's what 99% of people will be content with, but other people will want to actually do work, development etc on it.

    13. Re:Registry Editor by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You misspelled "apple land" there. Microsoft handily includes a microSD port with its tablets.
      You seem too used to the fact that in apple tablets and phones, whatever memory you buy the device with, you're stuck with. This is not the case here.

    14. Re:Registry Editor by cheater512 · · Score: 0

      Have you seen Explorer.exe? Microsoft can make a very very big file browser.

    15. Re:Registry Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'm officially terrified of how the hell MS thinks they're going to get MS Office anywhere reasonable around Android (thinking particularly devices like the Nexus 4, but even others, where the expandable storage is key if you want games and music and whatever else on there)... unless they make it so stripped down it's no better than the options already available, which are a pretty small footprint...

    16. Re:Registry Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder what would break if they just went ahead and emptied the recycle bin on these things. They've been there forever. Knowing Microsoft it's possible you end up breaking Word if you don't have notepad.

    17. Re:Registry Editor by sdavid · · Score: 2

      I'm an iOS guy, and let me say that the lack of a file manager is the most irritating thing about using iOS. I understand why Apple designed it to keep application data in independent silos, but that's often something you've got to work around. What makes RT interesting by comparison to iOS is that you do have a full file manager, you can access network drives, and you can shuffle stuff around just as if you were on a desktop machine.

    18. Re:Registry Editor by XiaoMing · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's supposed to be a freakin tablet.

      Which is a freakin' computer running a freakin' operating system.

      With freakin' lasers attached to their heads!

    19. Re:Registry Editor by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      You can use iPhone Explorer ( a third party app) to browse and delete/add files on an iOS device.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    20. Re:Registry Editor by sdavid · · Score: 1

      Good to know. I use GoodReader, which supports windows shares, ftp servers, dropbox, etc. A bit awkward, but it works.

    21. Re:Registry Editor by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Yeah! Functionality be damned! Even though all of those combined takes less than a meg of space! We want less options, Microsoft! Less!

    22. Re:Registry Editor by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      You misspelled "apple land" there. Microsoft handily includes a microSD port with its tablets. You seem too used to the fact that in apple tablets and phones, whatever memory you buy the device with, you're stuck with. This is not the case here.

      *WHOOSH* Reading comprehension is fundamental. The GP was talking about how Microsoft likes to cram the same OS onto multiple form factors. In the case of Windows 8 and Windows RT, they decided that desktop users should use an OS that is a cross between a tablet OS and windows instead of having a separate tablet OS which just uses some of the core functionality of windows and a separate desktop/laptop OS.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    23. Re:Registry Editor by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that explorer.exe is also the full graphical shell (taskbar, etc.). Also don't forget that, unlike most tablets, the Surface also includes a full window manager.

      As for the command prompt, cmd.exe is pretty tiny, but Powershell is (relatively) huge. You can basically use its script language to access the entire .NET framework. plus a bunch of additional commands and built-in help data.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    24. Re:Registry Editor by Rosyna · · Score: 1

      It has nothing to do with the size of the apps themselves but instead all the bits of the architecture needed to support those apps.

      You're only supposed to be able to use Metro apps and Office, according to Microsoft, on the Surface RT and these tools aren't needed to do that.

    25. Re:Registry Editor by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Explorer.exe is the entire desktop shell, not just the file browser.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    26. Re:Registry Editor by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      You assume they wouldn't do something equally stupid with this tablet?

    27. Re:Registry Editor by Darby · · Score: 0

      You seem too used to the fact that in apple tablets and phones, whatever memory you buy the device with, you're stuck with. This is not the case here.

      You can upgrade the RAM? Or did you mean storage. fracking marketroids.

    28. Re:Registry Editor by Darby · · Score: 1

      We want less options, Microsoft! Less!

      *Fewer*

      Less *bloat* could be had even without fewer options.

    29. Re:Registry Editor by ericloewe · · Score: 1

      Windows RT supports Win32. In fact, RT is built on top of the Win32 APIs, which means that Metro apps are just using APIs that (partially, at least) are wrappers for the Win32 APIs.

      Win32 and all associated architectural elements aren't going anywhere soon.

    30. Re:Registry Editor by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, microSD is RAM.

      Fracking idiots who can't read?

    31. Re:Registry Editor by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      Your grammar Nazism aside; sure. However the examples given by the person I was replying to are downright silly. Why wouldn't you have a notepad application on a tablet, or a file system browser, seriously?

    32. Re:Registry Editor by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      The registry system already exists, so the bulk associated with it can't be trimmed. The Registry editor only takes 10K on Windows 7; I can't see it taking much more on Windows. Once again, the DirectX framework already exists and I doubt the diagnostic tools take much more space than the framework itself. Just looking at my space analyzer on Windows 7*, the things taking up the most space are the winsxs folders (which hold a million different library versions and probably is not that large on Windows RT as it doesn't have legacy support), the Installer cache, assembly (probably .NET), System32 (drivers, registry, etc), SysWOW64 (probably doesn't exist on WinRT, so [citation needed]), the Microsoft.NET folder, Fonts, and Help. I'd imagine IE also takes a huge chunk, but that lives elsewhere. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if .NET (after things are compiled and optimized, not the installer packages) took most of the space on WinRT outside of Microsoft Office. Since that's a foundation of the "Not Metro" application stack, there's no reducing space there.

  8. 32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    Yes, really. There's no nice way to say it.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  9. OMFG software uses storage space?!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought all that was stored in the tiddly-winks chips.

    (16GB for Windows, Office and media apps.... my Desktop uses FAAAAAAR more. Get it through your head people - Surface is a touch screen ultrabook, not a tablet.)

    1. Re:OMFG software uses storage space?!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought all that was stored in the tiddly-winks chips.

      (16GB for Windows, Office and media apps.... my Desktop uses FAAAAAAR more. Get it through your head people - Surface is a touch screen ultrabook, not a tablet.)

      Get this through your head. Surface RT is a TABLET! The unreleased surface pro is an ultrabook style machine.

    2. Re:OMFG software uses storage space?!?!?!? by Spad · · Score: 1

      And? Does the definition of a TABLET contain "has less than 10% of the available space occupied by the operating system and base applications"? Perhaps it differs somehow from tablets, which are ultimately just portable touch-screen devices. Just because the iPad & Nexus 7 use a small percentage of their storage for the OS doesn't mean that it's somehow The Law.

    3. Re:OMFG software uses storage space?!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tablet with desktop mode ...

    4. Re:OMFG software uses storage space?!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RT is disabledwin8+walled garden of MSAppStore that runs on tablet hardware
      Pro is win8 that runs on tablet hardware

  10. Re:32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    And that there is part of the problem. "acceptance". Nope, no nice way to put it.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  11. Worse news for Surface sufferers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading this post has used the rest of the *out of memory error*

  12. Buy a Macintosh!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
  13. Please by Sparticus789 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you can spend $700 on a tablet computer, you can spend $50 on a 64 GB thumb drive.

    --
    sudo make me a sandwich
    1. Re:Please by dave562 · · Score: 1

      This.

      And the fact that you CAN access external media, unlike that other popular, non-android table.... pad thing.

    2. Re:Please by fa2k · · Score: 1

      If you can spend $700 on a tablet computer, you can spend $50 on a 64 GB thumb drive.

      Not the same. You'll always have a dongle sticking out of the tablet, it may not fit in the case, it gets caught on things when you put it in a bag, etc. Now an SD card is not so bad. Still some inconvenience in that you can't import pictures off other SD cards, but it's *much* better than those tablets that don't even have an SD slot.

    3. Re:Please by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      And the fact that you CAN access external media, unlike ...

      the Motorola XOOM "Google Experience", where the external SD card has been made READ ONLY, except when the device is mounted as a USB disk. So, you cannot store anything you create locally, or download via WiFi, on the external media. You can't even delete things you are finished with from the external media except by connecting baby to momma and doing it from a real computer.

      And this behaviour was part of an "upgrade" to the OS.

    4. Re:Please by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Or about the same on microSD card.

    5. Re:Please by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Still some inconvenience in that you can't import pictures off other SD cards

      There are these things that plug in to USB ports that let you stick in other memory cards.

    6. Re:Please by couchslug · · Score: 1

      64GB is pathetic for anything costing seven hundred bucks. It's like booting off a floppy.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  14. Boo fucking hoo by Sulik · · Score: 0

    does anyone really care ?

    --
    Help! I am a self-aware entity trapped in an abstract function!
  15. Microsoft's recommendations by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft's recommendations for adding additional capacity are to use cloud storage, a memory card, or a USB storage device."

    Here is my recommendation: "Buy something else."
    I for one, bought a Google Nexus 7, and quite like it.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    1. Re:Microsoft's recommendations by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

      Or just get the 64GB model.

    2. Re:Microsoft's recommendations by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      So you can't really do that whole memory card thing then?

    3. Re:Microsoft's recommendations by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Which doesn't have an SD slot. I only have two complaints about the Nexus 7, and that's one of them. (The other is that there's no HDMI port).

      That said ... I love my Nexus. If I ever need more storage, I'll find a way to use an external flash memory reader.

  16. Re:Its windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A fully loaded linux install takes up no more than 4 GB.
    13GB means bloat.

  17. Guys! Guys! THE CLOUD!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just use the CLOUD ! The cloud fixes everything!!!

    That should have been THIS FIRST thing you guys thought of, before even writing the article!

    I bet you guys feel really embarrassed now, huh?

  18. Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any estimate how much of that 13Gb does anything useful?

    Or how much is viral code?

    Remember, this is the company that would have you believe an office suite requires circa 140Gb of storage...

  19. Re:32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays by p0p0 · · Score: 1

    That's quite high for Android tablets. Most top out at 8-16GB, and they usually leave little room for user data also. So in comparison, they are really quite above most tablets available..

  20. Re:32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays by X0563511 · · Score: 2

    Indeed. I remember when a 40gb disk was huge.
    To... much... bloat...

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  21. Re:Its windows by tuppe666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    What did you expect? Of course to be fair, if you install a *full* version of the average desktop linux ( or bsd ) distribution you get tons of stuff by default too. Most of it you dont want.

    But still, for a tablet product they should have gone out of their way not to just toss crap onto it. Space is not cheap, like it is on a desktop.

    Idiots.

    Calling other people idiots doesn't make them so. As for your comparison with a Linux Desktop with a healthy selection of Apps I am running at 7GB after many months. I suspect a fresh install would require much less. Ubuntu for example https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Installation/SystemRequirements suggests 5GB.

  22. It DOES accept a MicroSD by timeOday · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It accepts a MicroSD, so who cares? Contrary to the market-segmentation-via-soldered-in-SSD strategy of certain other companies, the fact is, the stuff is very cheap - $1 per gigabyte.

  23. How about a car analogy, then. by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    Would you drive your car around with the hood welded shut and no lug wrench?

    If you insist on keeping important configuration in a ludicrously unreadable binary registry, instead of simple and efficient text files, you aren't going to be able to maintain the box with a general purpose tool like a word processor or text editor. Windows systems pretty much require a registry editor.

    1. Re:How about a car analogy, then. by zieroh · · Score: 1

      How about not having a registry to begin with? That seems like maybe a better idea.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    2. Re:How about a car analogy, then. by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I think more and more, apps are starting to use configuration files under the user's profile... though installers and windows itself seems to love the registry.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    3. Re:How about a car analogy, then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you drive your car around with the hood welded shut and no lug wrench?

      Many people, including myself, might as well. I lack the knowledge to understand what's in there. It's not that I lack the intelligence, it's that I have no interest in l learning a damn thing about it given the time investment it would take.

      I just want my car to work.

      If you insist on keeping important configuration in a ludicrously unreadable binary registry, instead of simple and efficient text files, you aren't going to be able to maintain the box with a general purpose tool like a word processor or text editor. Windows systems pretty much require a registry editor.

      The text editor is just as arcane a tool as the registry editor, if go look down at the details rather than just rely on your superficial impression.

      And configuration files range from the comprehensible to the inscrutable as well.

    4. Re:How about a car analogy, then. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you drive your car around with the hood welded shut and no lug wrench?

      Many people, including myself, might as well. I lack the knowledge to understand what's in there. It's not that I lack the intelligence, it's that I have no interest in l learning a damn thing about it given the time investment it would take.

      No, sadly, you probably do lack the intelligence. If you were smart enough to think this through, you'd almost certainly realize that I can't help you fix your car when it's broken down on the road with the hood welded shut, and I can't help you fix your broken registry on the commuter train if you don't have a registry editor. You'll have to haul the damnable thing in to the dealer and pay top dollar, even though I'd cheerfully help you for free.

      I just want my car to work.

      Again, if you think it's possible to have a car or computer that never ever breaks down, you are not very intelligent. Entropy exists and accidents happen. Purposefully buying into a locked-down product is for ignorant people (who can be enlightened, because they aren't stupid, they just haven't thought it out) and stupid people (who no amount of evidence can change).

      Which group are you in?

  24. Well, it's actually kind of cool... by joebok · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, it's actually kind of cool that the user can pop in a memory card. I guess I have gotten a little to used to iProducts that don't allow such niceties.

    1. Re:Well, it's actually kind of cool... by PRMan · · Score: 1

      All Android devices take micro SD cards that I've seen. In the last 2 years or so, they can go as high as 32GB.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Well, it's actually kind of cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not to mention how overpriced their nand is. $100 more for 16 more gigs? Its probably $15 at most using cheap low endurance TLC NAND.

    3. Re:Well, it's actually kind of cool... by gabebear · · Score: 1
      One thing to know is even the fastest microSD cards are much slower than the internal flash on an iPhone... Sadly, most Androids just use regular microSD tech for their internal storage.

      Read Speeds
      • microSD: 4-23MB/s
      • Samsung Galaxy SIII: 11.8MB/s
      • HTC One X+: 21.5MB/s
      • iPhone4s: 38MB/s
      • iPhone5: 100MB/s

      iPhone benchmarks
      microSD benchmarks
      Android Benchmarks

    4. Re:Well, it's actually kind of cool... by mcl630 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately more and more Android devices don't have micro SD slots, particularly all the recent Nexus devices.

    5. Re:Well, it's actually kind of cool... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's changing... The Nexus 10 doesn't have a uSD, to various people's consternation.

    6. Re:Well, it's actually kind of cool... by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      they sell the low-memory models at a proportionately lower profit margin than the high-memory models. that way the profits average out, and they get more buzz for having a really affordable entry level model.

    7. Re:Well, it's actually kind of cool... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Plenty do, plenty don't. I'd avoid any that don't have one like the plague myself. But then that's the great thing about Android- choice. There are devices of all shapes, sizes and feature sets out there to play with.

  25. Aha! by sootman · · Score: 5, Funny

    So there is a 16GB Surface! :-)

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Aha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And it's SUPER LIGHT when you discount the hardware and battery capacity that is dedicated to the OS.
      And it has TENS OF APPS when you only count, uh, all of them.

  26. Memory card. by csumpi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd rather take a device with 13gb free space and a memory card slot, rather than one with 28gb free and no way to expand.

    1. Re:Memory card. by mapsjanhere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By pure coincidence, 13 Gb with no expansion slot is all you get on a Nexus 7 16 Gb.

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    2. Re:Memory card. by tuppe666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      By pure coincidence, 13 Gb with no expansion slot is all you get on a Nexus 7 16 Gb.

      ...and you can buy three for the price of a surface giving you about 39gb of space :)

    3. Re:Memory card. by mapsjanhere · · Score: 1

      I started to look into wireless storage instead. Not as cheap as a SD card, but easier to carry than a couple of spare Nexus ;)

      --
      I'm aging rapidly, I bought a new game and had no idea if my machine was good for it.
    4. Re:Memory card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, how about 28gb free and a memory card slot as well? Bloat is bloat, and shouldn't be excused because you can add a memory card. It's much better if you can leave the card slot empty so you can add content from other devices like a camera. It's not MS v Apple, it's good hardware and software design versus bad.

    5. Re:Memory card. by elashish14 · · Score: 1

      And then use them to build a Beowulf cluster?

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    6. Re:Memory card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is fucking genius!!!! So rather than spend 30bucks on microSD, you need to carry 3 nexus 7 devices

    7. Re:Memory card. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And for next to nothing I can buy another 32 GB for the surface. Total now: 32 + 32 -13 = 51GB. Time to buy one more Nexus and we are over $1k.

      Good news: Nexus x4 has a 14" virtual screen and 16 cores. Great multi-tasking!!! ;)
      Bad news: It always shuts down 3/4 of the cores and I lose the image on 3/4 of my screen when using a single app or viewing a single movie :P

  27. Microsoft Recommends by Herkum01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Other misc recommendations

    • Leaving 10GB for patching
    • Nightly scheduled updates
    • A Virus Scanner
    • Regular de-fragmentation of the disk
    • Turn off unnecessary services like the "Print Spooler
    • Periodically clear on the systems logs to reduce the amount of used diskspace
    • Link your tablet to MS Live account

    REMEMBER, TABLETS ARE LOW MAINTENANCE! (compared to PC's)

    With Love,

    Microsoft

    PS: You really did not think things would change THAT much!

    1. Re:Microsoft Recommends by Spad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apart from "Link your tablet to MS Live account" that's mostly bollocks.

    2. Re:Microsoft Recommends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These devices with Win8 require no virus scanner?

    3. Re:Microsoft Recommends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you're probably right, nobody will try to infect 'that', so we can scratch virus scanner off the list, MS will release trivial stuff to update, every once in a while, not worth bothering, since no one will try to infect it, so, that goes too, what else ... oh yeah, at 13gb, OS+stuff, there won't be any serious defragmentation, maybe only those 10gb, but that's too little to worry about, nobody will print anything from it, because I doubt people will take their printers with them when they travel, and logs, well, as someone who had serious nose bleed inducing headaches trying to figure out cryptic messages, it would actually make my eys bleed from extreme pain, if I'd have to delete those logs.

    4. Re:Microsoft Recommends by gravyface · · Score: 1

      At least there's a log file. B-b-but iStuff just works! Umm, no, sometimes it doesn't... I guess I'll just swipe the on/off button for the 15th time, see if that makes a difference.

      --
      body massage!
    5. Re:Microsoft Recommends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh! it was a joke, chill nerdlinger.

    6. Re:Microsoft Recommends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this insightful?

      Recommending de-fragging an SSD?

      I knew /. hated MS, but this is low.

    7. Re:Microsoft Recommends by dontbemad · · Score: 1

      I laughed at "Regular de-fragmentation of the disk"

    8. Re:Microsoft Recommends by Qwerpafw · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Surface (RT) does apparently ship with Windows Defender.]

      So yes, Virus Scanner included/required.

      (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gQhhtvuZwVg)

    9. Re:Microsoft Recommends by Duggeek · · Score: 1

      Other misc recommendations

      • Leaving 10GB for patching -- Updates are not as cumulative with Win RT, so that figure is pure hyperbole
      • Nightly scheduled updates -- Handled via Windows Update over Wi-Fi and automatically when you 'sleep' your device.
      • A Virus Scanner -- irrelevant; Win RT comes with Security Essentials installed and activated (firewall+antivirus+monitoring) eliminating any need for 3rd-party packages.
      • Regular de-fragmentation of the disk -- yes, automatically (see Updates above)
      • Turn off unnecessary services like the "Print Spooler" -- I invite you to please point those out in Windows RT and provide the quantified advantage of doing so
      • Periodically clear on the systems logs to reduce the amount of used diskspace -- again, please point those out in RT and state those numbers
      • Link your tablet to MS Live account -- it's now referred to as a Microsoft Account, but can be inclusive of former services under MS Live. These services ensure consistent appearance, user-preferences and cloud storage access, which are all the more important with a mobile device.

      REMEMBER, TABLETS ARE LOW MAINTENANCE! (compared to PC's)

      Indeed!

      With Love,

      Microsoft

      PS: You really did not think things would change THAT much!

      Obviously, you didn't, but they really have. (FTFY)

      --
      This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
    10. Re:Microsoft Recommends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think this one was going for "funny" not "insightful". Maybe "incite full"???

  28. Flamebait submission by autocannon · · Score: 0

    This entire submission is total bullshit. It's intended to stoke the flames of the Microsoft haters and drive clicks here. So it takes up 13 GB? How does that compare to iPad, and the newest factory Android tablets? Is it really bloated, or is the additional stuff actually useful even if in limited circumstances. But no, instead all we get is a worthless and exaggerated metric when taken by itself. Any number taken out of context can be made to look bad.

    1. Re:Flamebait submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This entire submission is total bullshit. It's intended to stoke the flames of the Microsoft haters and drive clicks here. So it takes up 13 GB? How does that compare to iPad, and the newest factory Android tablets? Is it really bloated, or is the additional stuff actually useful even if in limited circumstances. But no, instead all we get is a worthless and exaggerated metric when taken by itself. Any number taken out of context can be made to look bad.

      iPad: ~4.5GB used for iOS6 and productivity apps (Pages, Numbers, and Keynote). Including the productivity apps to get a more fair comparison. So, a 32GB iPad with a similar software loadout has ~27.5GB free for user storage.

    2. Re:Flamebait submission by EXrider · · Score: 1

      iOS 6 is ~700MB - 800MB depending on what device you install it on. From what limited info I can gather online, Android "Jelly Bean" is anywhere from ~770MB - 900MB depending on what crap the vendors load on the device along with it. Point being, both of these OS's have been heavily optimized to be mobile. WinRT being many times larger than the average mobile OS, appears to be Windows 8 shoehorned into a mobile device.

      --
      grep -iw skynet /etc/services
    3. Re:Flamebait submission by terjeber · · Score: 1

      The equivalent for the Surface is 8G, and that includes what amounts to the .NET framework, which takes quite a bit of space, but enables developers to develop for a single platform rather than multiple platforms as with iOS and OSX. Good or bad one could argue either way, but the virtual machine and libraries take about 4G, so that would account for much of the difference.

      Office is also something quite different than the iOS productivity apps.

    4. Re:Flamebait submission by autocannon · · Score: 1

      See, that's incredibly pertinent information that should be part of the submission. I didn't know that, I'm not big into mobile. That is a rather large difference.

      So long as it works very, very well the size of the install will be a minor detail. That's a big if though.

    5. Re:Flamebait submission by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      but enables developers to develop for a single platform rather than multiple platforms as with iOS and OSX

      Bullshit.

      The language or libraries aren't why iOS and OSX apps are different, the target environment is different, and its different on a surface tablet as well. The same APIs are there for the most part in both, but you have to behave and do things differently in a touch based UI rather than a keyboard/mouse based UI. The iOS and Android solution? Target a tablet or a desktop, not both. Microsoft solution? EVERYONE DOES BOTH, like it or not, poorly!

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:Flamebait submission by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Target a tablet or a desktop, not both

      Sigh. So all the hoopla surrounding the fact that the Windows desktop OS is now designed around a touch metaphor is just bullshit? With Win 8 you can target the same application to both environments. X86 desktop and ARM tablet. No code change. No recompile. Same app.

  29. SemiAccurate story from 6 days ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    1. Re:SemiAccurate story from 6 days ago by Duggeek · · Score: 1

      http://semiaccurate.com/2012/10/31/microsoft-surface-can-not-compete-against-real-tablet/

      I find it interesting that any comments on that "pre-release" article (that didn't even test an actual Surface device) are hidden and have been closed. "Semi-accurate" indeed.

      The pure anti-MSFT sentiment is palpable and equally as misleading as the article claims MSFT to be; I'd call it a fountain of non-information.

      --
      This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
  30. Re:32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

    Child!
    I remember my first floppy disk drive with 68K per 5.25" disk.
    That was my third computer.
    Also, get off my lawn.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  31. .NET by Hentes · · Score: 3, Informative

    is like 4GB alone. They need to get rid of the bloat if they are serious about mobile/tablet.

    1. Re:.NET by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      is like 4GB alone. They need to get rid of the bloat if they are serious about mobile/tablet.

      .Net doesn't exist on the Surface RT.

    2. Re:.NET by Stickiler · · Score: 1

      .Net doesn't exist on the Surface RT.

      [citation needed] One of the big publicised features was that you could code for the Surface RT in .Net. So I bloody well hope it has the .Net framework on it.

    3. Re:.NET by terjeber · · Score: 1

      Sure it does.

    4. Re:.NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where did u get that number from, have you ever actually checked any facts before you post

    5. Re:.NET by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Windows 8, including RT, do not include the older versions on .NET by default. Granted, 4.5 alone is still quite large, but MS *has* removed most of the install footprint of .NET.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    6. Re:.NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are so wrong it's not even funny. Here's an article comparing performance of C# on a desktop vs a Surface RT: http://jeffputz.com/blog/review-microsoft-surface-rt

    7. Re:.NET by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      One of the big publicised features was that you could code for the Surface RT in .Net. So I bloody well hope it has the .Net framework on it.

      Could you point me to a publication from Microsoft saying that the .Net runtime will exist in Windows RT?
      Given that .Net programs wouldn't be Metro programs why would Microsoft include it for Windows RT? There's no way to get a program running on Windows RT without permission from Microsoft, and they sure don't want desktop apps running on Windows RT outside of Office.
      You can still program with C# and VB.Net as languages, but those apps will run on top of WinRT, not the .Net runtime. It's possible to create Portable Assemblies which can be loaded inside the .Net runtime as well as WinRT (and Phone 8 and Xbox), but I doubt there are too many existing .Net programs which have used them.

    8. Re:.NET by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Sure it does.

      Then why doesn't Visual Studio 2012 list ARM as one of the target types?

    9. Re:.NET by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I was pretty sure it did... for that matter, was pretty sure it was the core of cross platform compatibility for applications between RT and x86 at this point.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    10. Re:.NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .Net does exist on Surface RT - although as far as I know it is just the .Net 4.5 core edition needed to power .Net WinRT apps.

      Also .Net isn't like 4GB - even in an install of both .Net 3.5 SP1 and .Net 4.5 with both 32bit and 64bit versions, it is more like 1GB (although I was surprised that it was even that high...).

    11. Re:.NET by Stickiler · · Score: 1

      You can still program with C# and VB.Net as languages, but those apps will run on top of WinRT, not the .Net runtime.

      If you can program in C#.Net, or VB.Net, then you are using the .Net framework. They are literally one and the same. Not once did I say ".Net runtime" I said .Net framework. And the person I was replying to said ".Net doesn't exist on the Surface RT". For C# or Vb.Net to exist on the platform, it NEEDS .Net, or a .Net compatible framework, of which there is really only one other major one, which is Mono, and it is a Linux/Mac solution.

    12. Re:.NET by terjeber · · Score: 2

      It does. Next question.

    13. Re:.NET by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would break their incompatibility!

  32. Re:32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    40GB? Heck, I remember when 40MB was huge. I remember when 5MB was amazing.
    Now get off my lawn.

  33. Not surprising by fermion · · Score: 2
    A few ago I was buying a few PC laptops. I want one to be like an ultrabook, and actually found one that was a good price, and had what I thought was a 64 GB. My first Macbook Air had a 64 GB SSD, and though it was tight, the system, library, and applications are about 25 GB, it was workable even with iPhoto, though I never ran iMovie or Aperture on it. However, the sales person told me that since we were going to install full version of MS Office and do photo editing it would not work well.

    So this was always my assumption of putting a full OS on a tablet. It simply would not have enough power or memory to really make it work, even using something like the simplified interface that was so-recently-called-Metro. Even the 64 GB iPad is getting insufficient. I am not going to buy another until there is 128GB.

    So, big surprise, building a table to meet a price point is not going to result in a high end experience, no more than buying the cheapest laptop allows one to create a feature film. In this case, however, we may find that bloated software may not even allow one to write a memo in MS Word. I suspect we will find the low end solution is still going to be Android and Google Drive.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  34. well LA TE DA! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Get a load of little lord Fauntleroy here, with his floppy disk !

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:well LA TE DA! by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      That was my third computer. The first two saved to cassette tapes.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  35. The solution is obvious by phonewebcam · · Score: 1

    Just do what this guy did and use two: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-pMZd1fupw

  36. The Office Suite? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Excuse me, are we talking the freakin' OFFICE SUITE of programs when you say Microsoft Office? Are you INSANE? Why the fuck should this figure in any calculation at all? As much as I loathe the direction Microsoft is taking this sounds more like a shill padding his calculations than actual valid criticism of the device. A full office suite can easily eat up more than half of the space alleged to be unavailable to the user. Add to this that 40.6% != 50% and you got the typical sensational bullshit of shill propaganda. Pulling numbers out of my ass and making a guestimate removing the Office Suite will at least reduce this to more than 25GB leftover, with space to expand using both internet storage and external devices. If you really need space, you can just buy a 32GB memory card or better at a rather cheap price and leave it in the slot. If you really, really need space you can go ahead and buy the 64GB + a 32GB memory card with probably ~90GB leftover after the OS footprint.

    If you really need more than that locally either stop buying tablets and buy a proper laptop or accept the "inconvenience" of card-swapping. Jeez.

    This is coming from a Linux user. /endrant

  37. Hmmm by folderol · · Score: 1

    ~$ df Ooo look 7312160k - full office suite - browser *2 - graphics package *2 - video/music player *2 - music creation package * 7 - wine + PCB package *2 - cd/dvd package - etc.

    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ~$ df
      Ooo look 7312160k - full office suite - browser *2 - graphics package *2 - video/music player *2 - music creation package * 7 - wine + PCB package *2 - cd/dvd package - etc.

      Yeah. When you get close to a coherent point, call us back. df sure as hell doesn't work that way, so it'd be interesting (from a clinical perspective) to know what you were thinking.

  38. Binary vs Decimal gigabytes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the linked page, the storage capacities are advertised in decimal. How is that? Don't they use solid state storage, like every other tablet out there? Isn't that whole binary vs decimal discrepancy a characteristics of spinning storage? If not, how do the solid state storage manufacturers manage to only fit 32,000,000,000 bytes (reported as 29.8GB) where you would expect to see 34,359,738,368 bytes (reported as 32GB)? Do they somehow disallow access to the difference to keep the marketers happy?

  39. cannot install apps on micro-sd card by Nalez · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is great that the surface has a micro-sd card, but it suffers the same issues that the android platform has, which is that you can NOT install apps on the micro-sd card. For comparison, both IOS 6 and Jelly Bean are around 2gb in size.

    1. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but it suffers the same issues that the android platform has, which is that you can NOT install apps on the micro-sd card. For comparison, both IOS 6 and Jelly Bean are around 2gb in size.

      What? Of course you can install apps onto the MicroSD in Android devices :s You've been able to do that since 2.2.

    2. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by master811 · · Score: 1

      Erm yes, yes you CAN install apps on Android on an external SD card. I have one in my Galaxy S2 and it works perfectly. Originally yes it was the case that you were stuck with that, but that was about 2 years ago...... There are still a few apps which can't be moved to it, but overall most of them can.

    3. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by mcl630 · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to install apps on a molasses-slow sd card? Install your apps on the internal drive and use the sd card for videos, music, documents, etc.

    4. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by dido · · Score: 2

      Simply not true for Android. You can install apps on the SD card of an Android device: I've been doing it for more than a year because I have had no choice. I have been using an original HTC Desire as my primary phone for more than a year now, and it has a pathetically small amount of internal storage (only 512 megabytes, and only 150 of those are user-accessible!). It would be almost completely worthless if I was unable to install apps to the much larger 16 GB SD card I bought for it. Granted, there are certain apps which you cannot install on the SD card (e.g. widgets or apps for which there is some kind of copy protection), but those are few and far between and tend to be small. If you use custom ROMs it's even possible to partition SD cards so that portions of it look like part of the internal storage, so even those apps get to use the external SD.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    5. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You better take my Android phone. It must be defective because most of my apps are installed on the micro sd card.

    6. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      You actually can, it's just unsupported.

      Insert a microSD card.
      Format it to NTFS.
      Boot to command prompt as admin (officially supported).
      Copy the contents of the C:\Program Files\WindowsApps folder to the microSD card.
      Rename the WindowsApps folder (or delete it, if you feel brave).
      Unmount the microSD card (can be done with the mountvol utility).
      mkdir "C:\Program Files\WindowsApps"
      Mount the microSD card to the empty WindowsApps folder (diskpart or mountvol can both do this).
      Reboot to the normal mode.

      Just don't ever pull the microSD card...

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    7. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You comment on android and yet your link says nothing about android. And FYI, apps can be installed on the sdcard under android.

    8. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      Hmm... my android phone seems to have a number of apps installed on the SD card... weird. Not all apps have this option though.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    9. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      What? Of course you can install apps onto the MicroSD in Android devices :s You've been able to do that since 2.2.

      no, you can't. you can allow some of the app's resources to be moved to the SD card, but the code and some or all of the data still lives off of the SD card.

    10. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      Simply not true for Android. You can install apps on the SD card of an Android device: I've been doing it for more than a year because I have had no choice.

      no, you can't. you can allow some of the app's resources to be moved to the SD card, but the code and some or all of the data still lives off of the SD card.

    11. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually on Android there's a way to force all allowing of all apps to install to the SD card without rooting the phone. I did this with my Nexus One. See link: http://droid-den.com/android-guides/android-guide-force-apps-to-the-sd-card-without-rooting-a2sd/

    12. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by damaki · · Score: 1

      On Android, most devices do not have app2sd. But some, like the HTC ChaCha/Status have it. It's a vendor issue.
      You can install it if you root your device. Same goes for Windows RT, without the rooting part, you can use junctions to work around this stupid limitation.

      --
      Stupidity is the root of all evil.
    13. Re:cannot install apps on micro-sd card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm reading your post from an app installed on sdcard. That feature has been available for literally years!

  40. Paraphrasing Mr. Gates by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 2

    Nearly 13GB should be enough for everyone.

    1. Re:Paraphrasing Mr. Gates by gtall · · Score: 1

      Is there anyway we can convince you to be shot in the butt for such a lame excuse for comedy?

    2. Re:Paraphrasing Mr. Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ever deflating value of "gigabyte".

      A GB use to 1,073,741,824 bytes.
      Drive manufactures downsized it to 1,000,000,000 bytes.
      And now Microsoft redefines a GB to be 593,750,000 bytes.

    3. Re:Paraphrasing Mr. Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding me??

  41. Re:Its windows by cheater512 · · Score: 1

    A full version of Ubuntu including OpenOffice tips the scales around 2gig. You were saying?

  42. My new surface says: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    16.7GB Free of 24.9GB on a 32GB Model; 2GB Ram with Nvidia Tegra 3 Quad Core Arm

    It takes a micro SD card, so its easily upgraded and USB memory sticks simply plug in and work. Other USB devices I've tried like wired mouse, laser bar code scanner also just work without any error messages or power complaints.

    I have bought nearly every iPad on the day it came out, so some may call me an Apple Fan boy...

    But being objective and fair minded, we have to look past the specs, hype, press and people passing judgement without actually using the product.

    The detachable keyboard has a trackpad and operates with a mouse metaphor. You can also use it in tablet mode with the touch screen. The free remote desktop program works really well so I can remotely operate my regular desktops and servers. This is a big deal because it add another dimension to what I can use my tablet. Everybody kept saying that the keyboard was what made the Surface different and they are wrong. I have a good Kensington keyboard for my iPad - I never use it. Its the option of retaining the mouse metaphor that differentiates this product and its importance is hard to overstate.

    I had a little weirdness getting my account and password to work to access the Microsoft store, but these are growing pains that will quickly go away. Brace yourselves for much criticism, but in the end its noise.

    I have to say that I really like this device and can see really using it all the time. This is by far the best version 1 product I have ever seen out of Microsoft. I know some may say that this is Windows 8, but its also Surface Tablet version 1. This device will ease desktop and laptop users' transition to a more mobile paradigm. If Microsoft adds a low cost virtualization into Azure option for transferring old desktops into the cloud they will have a big winner.

  43. I RTFA by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Informative
    Windows RT+Office+Apps is 8GB, not 13GB.
    5GB is a recovery partition.
    3GB is lost* due to 32GB drive = ~32,000,000,000 bytes. System reports that as 29GiB.

    * The advertised local disk size is shown using the decimal system, while Windows displays the disk size using the binary system. As a result, 1 GB (in decimal) appears as about 0.93 GB (in binary). The storage capacity is the same, it's just shown differently depending on the how you measure a GB (decimal or binary).

    1. Re:I RTFA by Jerslan · · Score: 2

      Why not do what Apple and Android do with recovery with back-up and restore being "in the cloud" or via a PC? Would shave 5GB off that 13 and make a lot of people happier.

    2. Re:I RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or ship an install disk. There was a time not that long ago that when you buy software (including an OS), you get some form of installation media. Maybe someday a brilliant person will think of inventing installation media again and be done with these artificial problems.

    3. Re:I RTFA by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      I miss the days when I got real installation media and driver disks that contained drivers for other operating systems I didn't even have, and I hated the 90's era of recovery discs that factory restored all that bloatware I deleted immediately, but Apple's way of handling media-free installation has made me a convert. I ruined my partition on my Macintosh. I booted, and when the computer couldn't find any usable partitions, it connected online and downloaded enough to make the machine bootable, and from there, downloaded the rest of the OS and installed. Of course, I saved the installation files to a new recovery partition as well as a USB and FireWire portable drive. I even have an emergency file system on a FireWire drive in case my internal drive ever dies. This is a smarter way of doing things. My worst case scenario is having no connection and no access to my backup drives. The fact is, people lose their installation discs all the time and the only option has been paying for replacement discs or hunting down files online on some horrible support site.

      If installation media were ever to return, I hope it will be exclusively in the form of rewritable flash memory. I'll be blunt, read-only optical media is shit and has always been shit. If I buy boxed software, put it on flash media so I can transfer the contents to my larger mass storage and then reuse the flash drive like I did floppy diskettes.

    4. Re:I RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that since it was flash memory, that wasn't the case? Isn't the 3GB loss due to filesystem meta data?

    5. Re:I RTFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since it is a Microsoft product[Surface] specifying 32GB being read by another Microsoft product[Windows], they should be consistent on what counting system they are using.

    6. Re:I RTFA by Duggeek · · Score: 1

      How about 7GB of cloud storage; free? That comes with a Microsoft Account.

      I think I'd rather have that space for having photos, music, movies and documents available at all times rather than simply hope that it will work for disaster recovery. Should anyone really be dependent on cloud storage to initiate disaster recovery? Is that really such a good idea?

      --
      This post © Copyrite Duggeek, all rights reversed.
    7. Re:I RTFA by Jerslan · · Score: 1

      Apple seems to think so (I don't know about Android).

      One of the shiny new features with the launch of iOS 5 (over a year ago) was the ability to backup to iCloud if you wanted to. You also have the option of doing the backup via iTunes. The big question is whether having on-device restore functionality makes sense on a mobile device. Shouldn't your goal be that this should only be something you need to do sparingly? Why would you devote such a huge chunk of available disk space to something that the average consumer should (ideally) never have to use? It makes no sense.

      Apple has iCloud for free which does give you so many GB of storage for photos, documents and some other stuff. Media purchased via iTunes is available via iCloud and for $25/year all your other music (regardless of where/how you got it) can be too.
      Android has Google Drive and other Google cloud services that let you do the same things and probably a few more.

      The big point here is that Microsoft is still stuck in the past, doing a lot of the things they used to, because in the PC world it worked... That doesn't mean it'll work well (or be a good idea) in the Mobile world.

  44. Not as bad as DEC by cvtan · · Score: 1

    I bought a DEC Microvax for work many years ago and after many meetings with the DEC people about the specs of the thing, it was delivered with a 30Meg hard drive. After a few days the tech came to update the OS and found the disk was full as delivered so the update could not be done and we could not run any programs. Their solution was for us to delete all the help files and other "unnecessary" stuff. Sigh. We upgraded to a whopping 150Meg.

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  45. A Comparison: Free Storage IPad, Android, Surface by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IoSs 28/32G
    Android 28/32G
    Surface 15/32G

    http://semiaccurate.com/2012/10/31/microsoft-surface-can-not-compete-against-real-tablet/

  46. Re:Its windows by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Just as well Windows RT only uses 8GB then. There's a 5GB recovery partition.

  47. Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Informative

    And how much is it to add an additional 32gb or 64gb to your iPad if you hit your storage limit?

    You swap some data out to external storage, just as Microsoft recommends.

    $20 or $49 like the Surface or more?

    You can't put apps onto external media on the Surface either.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by tepples · · Score: 3, Interesting

      And how much is it to add an additional 32gb or 64gb to your iPad if you hit your storage limit?

      You swap some data out to external storage, just as Microsoft recommends

      I'm unfamiliar with recent changes to iOS. How exactly should an iPad user "swap some data out to external storage" without the help of a PC running iTunes?

    2. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

      I'm unfamiliar with recent changes to iOS. How exactly should an iPad user "swap some data out to external storage" without the help of a PC running iTunes?

      Well since music and movies can all be obtained through the cloud you can just purge all local storage of same. But also for apps that have data stored in iCloud you can delete the local storage.

      Or of course just keep some media on external network devices or SD cards and access it from there instead of putting it on the iPad.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by scot4875 · · Score: 1

      You didn't respond to the point, which is that you *can* attach external media. And you can't do that with the iPad.

      Personally, I'm no interested in either one, but Surface wins on this functionality checkbox.

      --Jeremy

      --
      Jesus was a liberal
    4. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iCloud.. or with the help of a Mac running iTunes, no PC needed. Cheers.

    5. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by tepples · · Score: 2
      (Context: comparing the support for external storage on Surface to that of the iPad)

      iCloud

      Which means you need to find a restaurant with open Wi-Fi if you want to move anything off or back on.

      or with the help of a Mac running iTunes, no PC needed

      Apple stopped making Macs that aren't Intel PCs six years ago. Does Apple still even make iTunes for PowerPC Macs?

    6. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Funny

      Which means you need to find a restaurant with open Wi-Fi

      It has to be a restaurant now? Damn Apple and its walled Olive Garden.

    7. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In theory you are correct but it is arguable as you can with windows 8. It is more to do with if you can trick RT with tools like junction which can fool the OS by making the join on the FS level.

      Same as mounting external disks to folders not drives (ie Unix style mounting)....it makes libraries and search work with them....

    8. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by JakeBurn · · Score: 1

      Just curious since I've never used it, but does RT not have cmd.exe or mklink.exe like all other recent versions of windows? If it does, why couldn't you put apps on removable storage? I've done this with windows 7 to an SD card before so was curious why they would have removed this functionality from the newest version of windows.

    9. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Surface essentially runs Windows 8, it should be possible to span drives using the disk management utility.

    10. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I laugh.

    11. Re:Impossible for apps, just like the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Configurator. And it's free.

  48. Not anymore by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Nexus 7 tablet - no SD card. Nexus 4 phone - no SD card.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Not anymore by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      To be fair, both of those devices are priced well inline with the lower end of the market segment. How many $600 Android phones can you find without an SD card.

    2. Re:Not anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HTC One X, for one. 16GB on the unit, no SD card slot. Wasn't a deal-breaker for me, but was close.

    3. Re:Not anymore by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      It's actually kind of irksome... my phone wouldn't really be as usable without the card.. but with 10gb open on my N7 don't miss it too much... I wish that they didn't charge such a premium on devices with 32gb out of the box...

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    4. Re:Not anymore by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      thank apple for this. huge success without SD card slots, which of course make the device more expensive.

  49. Its about the same by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Troll

    I'd rather take a device with 13gb free space and a memory card slot, rather than one with 28gb free and no way to expand.

    It's not like you can use that card to install applications on, so what does it really matter?

    You can use network storage from an iPad just as easily.

    It's better to have a larger amount of flash that performs really well than to stick some of the things you use on a poorly performing cheap SD card.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Its about the same by chispito · · Score: 2

      It's not like you can use that card to install applications on, so what does it really matter?

      Media collection?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
  50. Re:Its windows by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    It does if *I* say so.

    And you can be added to the idiot group if you like.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  51. Where did I put that file? by Princeofcups · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This may not sound convincing to the nerds who know their way around a computer, but the Surface is a Windows machine, and an iPad is an iPad. The concept of storage device, drive letter, file location is not really required on an iPad. I suppose you can say you need to know whether it is on the iPad or on the Cloud, but that's different from which drive to access to find your movie file, or which memory stick to use (did you label it?). Sure, I'd prefer a device with cheap expandability, but the iPad has sacrificed in a lot of areas to be as simple as possible, and for a vast many people that is a good thing.

    --
    The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    1. Re:Where did I put that file? by chispito · · Score: 3

      Sure, I'd prefer a device with cheap expandability, but the iPad has sacrificed in a lot of areas to be as simple as possible, and for a vast many people that is a good thing.

      The reason there is no expandable storage is so that you will buy the next model up. Do you really think it costs Apple anything close to another $100 to go from 16GB to 32GB?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    2. Re:Where did I put that file? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That or subscribe to iCloud. Yet another lock in and more costlier than a cheap SDcard, not forgetting the bandwidth you'd have to pay.

      _However_, all this bull about iPads having no recourse to expand storage other than upgrading is bollocks. Shows how much fandroids or anti-Apple shills there are here on /. Either that or the geeks here don't know what they are talking about, which is probably worse.

      Not defending Apple here, I'll be the first to say if you buy into their products you're a fool offering your wallet up. But still all these inaccurate crap about iPads having no way to expand storage is just bull. There's a difference between no way vs. a more expensive way of doing it.

  52. Re:Its windows by nurb432 · · Score: 0

    You were saying?

    I guess you cant read. What i said was clear, moron.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  53. An iPad can access external media by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    On an iPad using the camera connection kit, I can access an SD card and load images and movies from it.

    Or of course I could also load things from network storage.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:An iPad can access external media by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      ooh! the ipad has 'the camera connection kit'!! you can use it to 'access an SD card and load images and movies from it'!!
      they call it the usb port on surface, and its included in the sale price.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  54. Re:32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays by fatphil · · Score: 4, Funny

    This was from my 4th computer:
    http://fatphil.org/images/im_floppier.jpg

    Next!

    --
    Also FatPhil on SoylentNews, id 863
  55. Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is what it is...what's the big deal?

  56. But it's not a magnetic disk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All those NAND Flash memory devices I have seen so far had their capacity shown in KiB, MiB, GiB or equivalent units with base 1024. I think that's more natural because that's how you organize them, and because count of logic elements will not affect to the cost directly(the size of a die will, though). Does the Surface actually have Flash with base 1000? That'd be interesting.

  57. Re:32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays by mcl630 · · Score: 1

    40GB??? My first PC had a 20MB hard drive. My 2nd had a whopping 40 MB...

  58. What apps are that big? by tepples · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You can only use that space on the SD card for data. You cannot use it to store apps.

    Say the Surface's memory is evenly divided into 16 GB for the operating system and included applications and 16 GB for third-party applications, with all music and movies on a microSD card. What kind of application collection takes up 16 GB, other than a bunch of hardcore games? I thought hardcore games weren't ported to Windows RT, and most apps and casual games were far smaller than that.

    1. Re:What apps are that big? by MrEdofCourse · · Score: 1

      I realize that Surface RT may never get a library of 16GB worth of apps, but it's not uncommon on iOS for someone to have that many. All it takes is for a few hard core games and reference apps.

    2. Re:What apps are that big? by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 1

      Say the Surface's memory is evenly divided into 16 GB for the operating system and included applications and 16 GB for third-party applications, with all music and movies on a microSD card. What kind of application collection takes up 16 GB, other than a bunch of hardcore games?

      Apparently "the operating system and included applications". Really, though, that statement basically begs the question of "is Windows RT really that bloated?" or "didn't you just answer your own question?". And that doesn't even get into the point of people wanting to, oh, dual boot Linux on the thing... This is /., after all. :)

      I thought hardcore games weren't ported to Windows RT, and most apps and casual games were far smaller than that.

      Well, if MS Office and whatever else is in the MS offering is allowed to be bloated like that, surely the OSS equivalents which will be side installed--can you remove those "included applications"?--by the die hard OSS people--go figure why they'd buy an MS Surface Tablet...--are allowed to take up gobs of space too. Seriously, though, this is one reason I'm still not sold on tablets in general--beyond all the ways they're generally inferior to a laptop for lacking a keyboard; the storage capacity isn't reasonably there for one's music/movie collection. But, then, I'm the sort of person who wants to buy a NewsRadio collection, rip it to disk, and then be able to play it anywhere on my shiny new tablet without (a) reencoding it down just for the tablet or (b) considering buying a separate SD card just for it (or it and one other thing). HDs are still king for storage and just not a good idea for tablets. So, I think the world is reasonably at an impasse for at least a few years until internal storage capacity doubles a few more times. Ie, the year of the tablet may actually be at hand and not just a fun fad. :/

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    3. Re:What apps are that big? by guttentag · · Score: 1, Informative

      What kind of application collection takes up 16 GB, other than a bunch of hardcore games?

      Navigation apps. Navigon's app is several gigabytes once you download the maps, the 3D terrain data, the POI data, etc.

      Topographical apps. Several gigabytes.

      Why would someone put both nav and topo maps on their tablet? Every couple months I attach my iPad to my dash (large-screen turn-by-turn GPS), drive to a different destination in another state, throw the iPad in my backpack and go hiking in a place where there are no cell-towers (hence the topographical apps).

    4. Re:What apps are that big? by tepples · · Score: 1

      What kind of application collection takes up 16 GB

      didn't you just answer your own question?

      OK, other than Office and hardcore games, what kind of application takes up more than half a gigabyte? You can also exclude developer tools like Visual Studio and Eclipse because the Windows Store lockdown means you probably won't be able to develop for Windows RT on Windows RT.

      And that doesn't even get into the point of people wanting to, oh, dual boot Linux on the thing

      I thought the hardware was cryptographically locked against doing exactly this. Die-hard free software users should be buying Android tablets with unlocked bootloaders instead.

      without (a) reencoding it down just for the tablet

      What's so bad about reencoding, especially for an NBC sitcom like NewsRadio that's not action-packed? Can't you just reencode a season at a time overnight on your multicore desktop PC? I must be missing something.

    5. Re:What apps are that big? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Navigon's app is several gigabytes once you download the maps, the 3D terrain data, the POI data, etc.

      And why can't nav and topo apps store maps and the like on the SD card?

    6. Re:What apps are that big? by countach · · Score: 1

      It's not hard to fill an iPad's memory with apps if you want to.... even without games.

    7. Re:What apps are that big? by hairyfish · · Score: 2

      but it's not uncommon on iOS for someone to have that many.

      Really? I just did a quick survey of the people in my office and not one was using more than 16GB (including music and movies) on any of their devices (both Apple and Android) . For most people, tablets are toys for facebooking, photos, email, web browsing, and a maybe some music. From my own group of acquaintances, not one uses them for regular movie or TV watching (although mnay admit to loading a movie or two if they intend taking a long haul flight), and not one has even 1GB of apps let alone 16+.

    8. Re:What apps are that big? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      OK, other than Office and hardcore games, what kind of application takes up more than half a gigabyte? You can also exclude developer tools like Visual Studio and Eclipse because the Windows Store lockdown means you probably won't be able to develop for Windows RT on Windows RT.

      Now that your argument has been totally destroyed, it isn't the issue anyhow. People who need more storage, be it surface, android flavor, or iPad, will probably just buy a new one with more storage. The only people who are thinking in terms of "I'll just attach" or I'll just buy" are in here. Everyone else sees these things as semi-disposable.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    9. Re:What apps are that big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For most people, tablets are toys for facebooking, photos, email, web browsing, and a maybe some music.

      If this were true, the sales on the 32GB and 64GB iPads should be abysmal compared to 16GB. In reality, they sell very well (behind the 16GB version, but still way ahead of anything else).

      Conclusion: your office offers only a skewed sample of Apple's user base .

      And don't tell me "Apple users buy more than what they need." As the anti-Apple crowd loves to point out, the storage upgrade is expensive, which can and does make most people think twice; and a significant part of Apple's sales these days are to people who already own iPads (or at least iPhones), and thus know up front exactly how much storage they need.

    10. Re:What apps are that big? by guttentag · · Score: 1

      And why can't nav and topo apps store maps and the like on the SD card?

      MS Security?
      It's possible that if MS is requiring apps to be on the internal memory, they'll require the developer's data to be there too.

      Developer Lack of Foresight?
      Who's to say the developers will think of that? The most-common complaint on the iTunes store about Navigon's otherwise-excellent app is that every time they release an update to the software, you have to download all your maps again. Even if it's just a bug fix that has nothing to do with the map data. They used to make you download all the maps, even if you just needed your state. After they were acquired by Garmin, their response to the complaints was to include a map manager that lets you choose which states you need... but you still have to download them every time you update the software. If you keep the maps for the whole U.S. on your device (I like to know that I've got the maps ahead of time, without having to sit down and download them before I go someplace), we're talking about a few gigabytes of data that you already had. They don't seem very interested in letting you store your maps outside the app.

    11. Re:What apps are that big? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the point is that they use storage space for things that aren't application but data.

      Things you can use expansion slot for on w8.

    12. Re:What apps are that big? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You'll be using nokia maps with windows 8. It's one of the best if not the best on the market (navteq's data) and lifetime worldwide free online and offline.

      It can store its data where you tell it to, or at least the symbian version I'm using can, be it system drive or memory card. I'd be surprised if they gimped it to not be able to store data on memory card.

    13. Re:What apps are that big? by bmcage · · Score: 1

      TomTom for android downloads 3 Gb for the Europe map. Hopefully there's an option to put it on the SD....

    14. Re:What apps are that big? by Fr33z0r · · Score: 1

      I just looked on mine out of idle curiosity, after owning it from late September I'm sitting at about 30GB used, with almost no videos or music on it, and only a couple of hundred photos.

      I most likely don't live in the "most people" category, though.

    15. Re:What apps are that big? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use almost all of my storage on my nexus 7. But I also have (almost) the entire libraries of every 8-64 bit video game system stored on it. No I do not get bored. :)

    16. Re:What apps are that big? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Since this is windows, it will be using bing maps, formerly known as nokia maps. At least on symbian, these allow you to choose where the navigation and mapping data is stored.

    17. Re:What apps are that big? by bmcage · · Score: 1
      TomTom took 3 years to provide an Android app, and it does not have all the iOS features, so a Win 8 app could be a way off. As TomTom sells dedicated GPS units, the smartphone part is in competition with their GPS units.

      However, their app is really good...

    18. Re:What apps are that big? by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      There are currently two major map providers, and one that was late for the party. Big ones are Navteq, which has been owned by nokia for about five years and TeleAtlas, which has been more recently purchased by TomTom.

      Then there's google, that is quite a bit behind the other two.

      Navteq's native application had been rebranded ovi maps, and subsequently nokia maps and now provides mapping data (but not interface) for bing maps. It's still the same thing, and it's arguably the best on the market right now. TomTom still suffers from some adaptation problems and mapping issues, such as those spotted in ios6 (TomTom is the map data provider for apple). The main difference is that navteq/nokia offer full, global and lifetime mapping data and updates with the purchase of your device. TomTom's model is to charge microtransactions for these things (or at least it was when I tried using their standalone navigator a couple of years ago). The quality of application differs with the application provider, but in my experience nokia maps are about as good as tomtom's standalone devices.

    19. Re:What apps are that big? by MrEdofCourse · · Score: 1

      What's odd to me about that is that I have over 36GB in apps alone... worse, I don't have all that many of the big games or text books. Text books can be HUGE. For example Pearson’s Biology: 2.77GB.

  59. Plenty of Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Until we hit SP1. And, don't forget the patches for the vulnerability in the built in browser that 90% of the tablet functions will require the use of.

    I'm sure that Microsoft will do a much better job of policing their App Store than those other guys. So, no worries there right?

  60. Once you can't buy a netbook anymore by tepples · · Score: 1

    And WTF do I need Office on a tablet for? That's why my notebook and PC are for, and in a pinch my netbook.

    It's for carrying around with you instead of a netbook. And it's for using once your netbook breaks. With no mention of Microsoft making available a special cheap OEM version of Windows 8 for netbooks the way it did for Windows XP (ULCPC licensing) and Windows 7 (Starter Edition), I've read that netbooks won't be sold in stores anymore. Even the maker of the Eee PC, which launched the netbook category, has discontinued its line of netbooks.

  61. Recovery partition? by cbhacking · · Score: 4, Informative

    The Surface comes partitioned with a 3.5GB recovery partition, which can fully reset the device including drivers, OS updates, full volume encryption + losing the recovery key, and people running amok with Admin permissions (assuming they don't mess with the recovery volume itself). The iPad, last I checked, still required the use of a real PC if something goes drastically wrong and it needs resetting. It can handle typical reset scenarios just fine, but can't be used to downgrade (or so I'm told; that may be wrong). I don't know if the iPad even supports installable drivers, either (although on the Surface RT, they must be signed by MS so hopefully not *too* much harm would occur from them).

    The Surface also comes with the standard suite of Windows admin tools, including the Management Console and the Disk Management snap-in for it. You can modify the partitions if you want to. You could even back up the recovery volume to a USB storage device or NAS (the device supports booting from USB, not sure about NAS) and then remove the recovery partition and extend the main volume to fill its space. You can also mount a removable storage device, such as a microSD card or USB Mass Storage volume, into the root filesystem. Can an iPad do anything like that?

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    1. Re:Recovery partition? by Karlt1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      "The iPad, last I checked, still required the use of a real PC if something goes drastically wrong and it needs resetting."

      You can completely erase your iPad and restore apps, data, and the OS from iCloud -- no PC required. Even if you lose your iPad, you can just log in with your iTunes account from a brand new iPad and all of your apps, settings, even icon positions are restored from iCloud -- no PC required.

      "The Surface also comes with the standard suite of Windows admin tools, including the Management Console and the Disk Management snap-in for it. You can modify the partitions if you want to. You could even back up the recovery volume to a USB storage device or NAS (the device supports booting from USB, not sure about NAS) and then remove the recovery partition and extend the main volume to fill its space. You can also mount a removable storage device, such as a microSD card or USB Mass Storage volume, into the root filesystem. Can an iPad do anything like that?"

      Are you referring to the ARM version (the one referenced in the article or the x86 version?

    2. Re:Recovery partition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Installable drivers to do what? It's not like you open up a tablet and install a new component.

      Of course the iPad doesn't allow installable drivers, have you ever seen a tablet?

    3. Re:Recovery partition? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      The Surface comes partitioned with a 3.5GB recovery partition, which can fully reset the device including drivers,

      So basically a copy of Android's CWM partition, except an order of magnitude larger?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    4. Re:Recovery partition? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      Android tablets have USB ports.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    5. Re:Recovery partition? by um...+Lucas · · Score: 2

      iPad doesn't need drivers, it's a different creature. It can print to any AirPrint printer, and that's about it. Also, you can backup your iPad to iCloud, and if something goes drastically wrong, restore from there too (i believe- i haven't had anything go that drastically wrong ever).

      I'm curious about your claims in the second paragraph? Is this all from first hand knowledge, developer notes or speculation? From what I'm reading, Windows RT is QUITE locked down, hindering all sorts of things. With Surface Pro on x86, it should be possible to do all that stuff, though. And if MSFT locks it down so much that you can't, well, you can always buy a tablet from any other PC maker once they start ramping up.

      Surface Pro seems mildly interesting, the Regular Hobbled Surface, i wouldn't touch that with a ten foot pole. I'd accept one free, but only to sell it on eBay. Nothing about that version seems of any interest to me, and i can't think that any one on slashdot would find the least bit of use for it. The walled garden is alive and well on it for software developers. Microsoft is the gatekeeper deciding which Flash sites one should be allowed to visit. No capability of running x86 apps (read, every program installed on my computer at work). Seriously, what is there to like about the thing?

    6. Re:Recovery partition? by um...+Lucas · · Score: 1

      Forgot, only IE (sans many plug-ins). No Firefox, Chrome or any other browser.

    7. Re:Recovery partition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, no they aren't. Icon positions are fucked-up during iOS upgrades as well.

      Er, what? I have never needed to mess with iCloud restores, fortunately, but my icons stayed where they were when I did the OTA upgrade from 5.1 to 6.0.1 on my iPad 3 last week.

    8. Re:Recovery partition? by sensationull · · Score: 1

      Surface with MMC: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=dkTWh-5QEeQ there are a whole set of other videos of an actual Surface in use.

    9. Re:Recovery partition? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      You can completely erase your iPad and restore apps, data, and the OS from iCloud -- no PC required. Even if you lose your iPad, you can just log in with your iTunes account from a brand new iPad and all of your apps, settings, even icon positions are restored from iCloud -- no PC required.

      Even if the iPad isn't bootable (say, ran out of power while installing a kernel update)? That's possible - it implies the presence of a small recovery system tucked in there somewhere, with enough smarts to connect to the Internet and fix the main system - but given that you thoroughly misinterpreted what I said, I doubt it. I wasn't talking about "normal reset scenarios" like you describe (in fact, I explicitly pointed that out in my post) but rather things where the situation requires actual recovery. You also didn't address downgrading.

      Are you referring to the ARM version (the one referenced in the article or the x86 version?

      The x86 version isn't even out yet. I was referring to the ARM version. The management tools are, unsurprisingly, hidden by default (i.e. not on the Start screen). However, they are definitely present, if you choose to show them in Start and/or you know how to use the command line. I take it, from your response, that the iPad can't do any of those things.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    10. Re:Recovery partition? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Peripherals, not internals. The Surface RT has a standard USB host port. It's also thinner than all but the most recent iPads, incidentally, so "it's a tablet!" isn't really an excuse for *not* having one.

      That USB port is probably going to mostly be used for USB Mass Storage devices, of course, but it also supports printers, game controllers, other types of storage (optical drives, UMS + various encryption schemes), media devices (can you manage songs on your iPod using your iPad?), scanners, cameras, cellular modems, GPS or other sensors, mice (including pretty advanced ones), non-basic keyboards, and... well, pretty much anything else that has a driver for Win8. MS claims over 100,000 devices supported.

      Sure, you aren't going to leave those things connected on a regular basis, but the difference is that with a Surface (or other Windows RT device), you *can* connect peripherals if you want to. The situation on iPads regarding printing was essentially nonexistent for some time, and still isn't very good... and they don't even come with full copies of Word!

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    11. Re:Recovery partition? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Restoring a backup requires that the device be bootable though, right? Not very useful in the case of a FUBARed update or somebody messing up the system files after jailbreaking, or while attempting to do so. Also, still nobody has mentioned support for rolling back an update that you don't want.

      As for the second paragraph, it's first-hand experience. My company bought me one for research and training (we're a digital security firm; they've also bought myself and other employees various Android and iOS devices) and so far the only thing that I hoped/expected to be able to do that hasn't worked has been to boot into testsigning mode (bcdedit is there, and you can add or modify boot options, but testsigning is explicitly blocked). Since that enables running third-party desktop apps, I wasn't terribly surprised that they blocked it, but I'm still looking into bypassing that restriction. In the meantime, scripting (using powershell, in particular) works fine and is an easy way to add third-party programs (as does sideloading of "apps"). In terms of "QUITE locked down", what gave you that impression? It runs as a standard user with UAC by default, so "rooting" it is a click away. It does not support replacing the bootloader with a non-Microsoft one, but you can boot it from external storage if you want to (though the bootloader will still need a MS signature). I'm looking into chainloading the built-in bootloader to GRUB or similar; no idea if that will work yet, but it's worth a shot.

      I'm amused by the implication that Flash is locked down, while ignoring the fact that there's no other device running this CPU and form factor that comes with Flash at all anymore. Incidentally, bypassing the Flash restriction is easy; there are two different known ways to make it work (either modify the compatibility list, or add the domain to a test value in the registry; there are scripts on the XDA-Developers site to do this easily). As for the walled garden, there's no limits on scripting and sideloading is officially supported (you're only *supposed* to use it for development or LOB apps, but you *can* use it for whatever the hell you please). It's at least as flexible as Android in that regard.

      As for what's to like, its got good specs (for an ARM device, screen resolution aside) and battery life, has the interface and software that most of the computing world is used to (yes, it also has the "Metro" stuff, but the desktop and admin tools are very similar to Win7), it's got microSD and full USB and HDMI out (unlike typical tablets), it's got a full-size spill-proof keyboard and trackpad built into the cover and a kickstand built into the back, it includes Office, it can run the same Windows Store apps as normal Win8 (without requiring that you re-purchase them), and it's highly portable?

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    12. Re:Recovery partition? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      But with Tracking Protection (which makes a decent ad-blocker in addition to its basic purpose, and is able to use automatically-updating third-party lists from folks like EasyList, better known for the AdBlock Plus list), developer tools, process isolation, tab separation, and so on. You can set it so that links from any app, desktop or "Metro", open in the desktop IE, which is probably what you want to do.

      As for third-party browsers, there's nothing stopping them from being ported. They'd have to be store apps ("Metro", not desktop) but the APIs and language support are there, apps are allowed to register as default filetype and URI scheme handlers, and they'd be sandboxed so they would need to use the WinRT file picker APIs to do things like save or upload files (no big deal; just use them instead of the Windows Common Controls library).

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  62. Re:Its windows by robot256 · · Score: 1

    I get it! You made an irrelevant comment that could be easily misunderstood to be relevant, then you get to make fun of people for misunderstanding what you said! I have not seen such artful trolling for many months. Well done, sir!

    (Since this discussion is about how ridiculous the size of the Windows tablet installation is, stating that Linux desktops include unwanted apps without making any sort of size comparison is completely irrelevant to the discussion.)

  63. Monthly data cap by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well since music and movies can all be obtained through the cloud

    The cloud is useless if it can't be reached because A. you have the Wi-Fi-only version and are away from home and open hotspots, B. you have no cellular data subscription, or C. you've already burned through your data plan this month.

    Or of course just keep some media on external network devices

    Which portable external network devices are you talking about?

    or SD cards

    I guess the Surface can, but I wasn't aware the iPad could play movies and the like from an SD card.

    1. Re:Monthly data cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The cloud is useless if it can't be reached because A. you have the Wi-Fi-only version and are away from home and open hotspots, B. you have no cellular data subscription, or C. you've already burned through your data plan this month.

      D. You're overseas, and data access is expensive.
      E. You're at a site where wireless transmissions are not permitted. (I'm at a radio telescope right now; I imagine there are other examples.)

    2. Re:Monthly data cap by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Well since music and movies can all be obtained through the cloud

      The cloud is useless if it can't be reached because A. you have the Wi-Fi-only version and are away from home and open hotspots, B. you have no cellular data subscription, or C. you've already burned through your data plan this month.

      Or how about D) your 4G network has only poor 3G coverage where you are which is not nearly fast enough for streaming movies.

    3. Re:Monthly data cap by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      Or I'd just rather not have to push and pull everything over a radio at all, eating up disk space with a local cache anyway?

      I like being able to add storage to my phone and tablet (both android devices). I pick the size, speed, and price. I also like being able to plug in a thumbdrive if I want to. I think it's a valid preference, full stop. And it sounds like microsoft did this part right (I don't own a surface).

      I've only had one device where the preload size really pissed me off, and that's the Xbox. And only because I had to get their ridiculously overpriced drives, and go through the aggravation of swapping them out. I guess now they allow some things to be pushed off the console to a usb drive.

    4. Re:Monthly data cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you cannot play them directly from the SD card but you can import them for play then delete them....not ideal.

      External WIfi HDDs are the best option especially if you can get them on a SMB share and use filebrowser etc

      Jailbroken Ipads can use usb hdd via the photo kit but you can't do it with IOS which is annoying.

    5. Re:Monthly data cap by Psyborgue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      iCloud is also useless if you switch countries. I bought hundreds of apps, movies, and TV content in country A, moved to country b, cancelled my credit card, and changed my account information on my iTunes account. Suddenly there were no more downloads listed. I contacted apple, having had great experience with them in the past, and their response was that if I did not have a physical backup, i would have to repurchase all the content. The next day I sold my iPad, am in the process of selling my 17" MBP, and am about to buy a Nexus tablet. Moral of the story: never, ever, trust the cloud. That being said, all my android apps still work after the move and my phone doesn't seem to mind the new credit card. I get a new store but I can still download my old apps.

    6. Re:Monthly data cap by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Moral of the story: never, ever, trust the cloud.

      Also, never ever trust Apple. If you had used an open cloud provider, they would be data-agnostic and just push you files.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:Monthly data cap by Psyborgue · · Score: 2

      That too. I had bought apple for years. I spend probably well over ten grand on apple products and from my first Powerbook 17" to my G5 tower, and the list goes on and on. Never in a thousand years did I think such a customer focused company would screw me like they did... but they did. And as a result they lost a loyal customer and Apple "evangelist" who will never, ever, again buy an Apple product.

    8. Re:Monthly data cap by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      cancelled my credit card, and changed my account information on my iTunes account. .

      Nothing compelled you to do that, and if you expected licensing issues to not result, you haven't been paying attention. Neither the cloud nor Apple makes the decisions here, it's how the content providers license stuff. The real question is as to why you actually purchased content on the ITMS.

    9. Re:Monthly data cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you blame Apple because you didn't read and understand the TOS they publish that states content from different accounts and countries are not transferable?

    10. Re:Monthly data cap by YodasEvilTwin · · Score: 1

      And this, even more than the price and the too-extreme simplicity of their products, or the sycophants, is why I'll never buy an Apple product (assuming things don't change). The lengths they go to to harm their own customers is amazing. Relevant: http://www.seattlerex.com/seattle-rex-vs-apple-the-verdict-is-in/

    11. Re:Monthly data cap by tepples · · Score: 1

      The real question is as to why you actually purchased content on the ITMS.

      How else should one lawfully obtain a copy of a Hollywood feature film playable on a tablet computer without going through the iTunes Store or a store with a similar digital restrictions management policy?

    12. Re:Monthly data cap by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      It's called a DVD.

    13. Re:Monthly data cap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually thought this had happened to me, as my purchase list was empty after moving, then i when i was going to rebuy an app on my ipod, it was suddenly free, and i realised all my previous purchases were still there, i just had to remember the names of them!

      Sad to hear you were uninformed about this possibility, i am tech supporter of both win and mac and often surprise store clerks about their own products:)

    14. Re:Monthly data cap by Psyborgue · · Score: 2

      Do tablets have DVD drives? Do newer Macbooks? And to rip one you need to download something to circumvent css encryption which is illegal in the United States, so if you want to quibble about the details of 50 pages of legalese that changes ever release, I can quibble about that. Yes, I knew stuff I purchased (Apple's word) was licensed to me. Yes, I knew purchased content was not transferable between accounts. Yes, I knew not all items were available in all stores, but not in a million years did I expect they to revoke *access* to content I had already purchased in Country A simply because I switched accounts to Country B. I expected a different store. I did not expect to lose access to all my downloads, especially since the vast majority of those were also available in Country B's store. I contacted Apple and they said they "tried" to make an exception, and I should re-check my downloads queue. When nothing changed, they told me I was out of luck and I would have to re-purchase everything. That is absurd. I don't care whether the data was "licensed" or not. It's horrible customer service and totally unusual compared to the fantastic experiences I was used to.

    15. Re:Monthly data cap by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      To be fair to Apple, I had that exact same 8600m problem with my MBP out of warranty and they fixed it for free. Also, the Apple lawyers were probably uninformed in that article. According to the "Genius" I talked to, the second revision "logic board" I got does not have the same problem. Actually it's partially this pleasant experience that prompted me to switch countries in my iTunes account. I wanted to buy Mountain Lion to show my appreciation. LOL. No good deed, as they say... And now I'm finding a real difficult time selling the thing considering the late 07 series with the 8600M NVIDIA chip-set are considered lemons.

    16. Re:Monthly data cap by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      That's what I read on the web too, but all the apps prompt me to repurchase. Perhaps you moved to a country speaking the same language. Tech support (and her surpervisor) told me I had to repurchase. Also even if I did have the apps back, that would only be a small portion of my purchases. We're talking seasons of TV, movies, etc.

    17. Re:Monthly data cap by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Didn't it turn out that using Handbrake or whatever for personal backup is Fair Use? A USB DVD drive is like $35 these days. I feel for your loss, but I personally have never trusted paying for content that I perpetually rely on someone else for access to. You didn't already have those downloads cached?

    18. Re:Monthly data cap by tepples · · Score: 1

      Didn't it turn out that using Handbrake or whatever for personal backup is Fair Use?

      No. Universal v. Reimerdes. If this has changed in Slashdot's home country, I'd appreciate a correction.

    19. Re:Monthly data cap by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Dumbass. Take a trip back to Country A and download all your stuff. Whhaaa, I didn't think to check if I can transfer my stuff between countries!
      This site used to be full on intelligent people. Now it's just a bunch of whiners who probably piss on the closed toilet seat and complain that it wasn't pre-lifted for them.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    20. Re:Monthly data cap by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      It's not IP an restriction that i'm talking about you fucking mouth breather or I would use a VPN (iTunes is not restricted geographically by IP, unless you make a repeated *purchases* from outside your area). The problem is I need to actually have a CREDIT CARD back in country A. That's considerably harder than simply taking a trip back to country A. Even if that's all it would take, I shouldn't need to do that. It's the principle of the thing. Anyway I had well over a terabyte of purchases. It would have to be a long vacation at your average hotel's connection speed.

      What will I end up doing about this? I belong to a very good private tracker. I'll get the data back in a week or so, if not less. I'm not whining. I'm merely pointing out that iCloud has significant drawbacks for international users.

  64. Lack of drivers by tepples · · Score: 1

    There are these things that plug in to USB ports that let you stick in other memory cards.

    Just because you can physically plug devices into the machine doesn't mean that the operating system will recognize the devices. I seem to remember several tablets not having drivers for USB mass storage.

    1. Re:Lack of drivers by AbhiTheOne · · Score: 1

      This is 'Windows' we are talking about, which has the highest number of inbox drivers any OS ever had.
      Plus for most of the USB devices (like thumb driver, external HDD, Digi Camera, keyboard, mouse, etc.) Windows doesn't need particular driver, there are class drivers, which works just fine with respective class of devices.

    2. Re:Lack of drivers by viperidaenz · · Score: 1
      If you RTFA it specifically states USB drives are supported.

      USB flash drive or hard drive

  65. the article says 13GB and almost half by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 2

    8GiB for RT+Office+apps
    5GiB for recovery

    That's 13GiB gone. From 29GiB, that's almost half.

    'After taking into account Windows RT, Microsoft Office, built-in apps, and Windows recovery tools, nearly 13 GB of the available space is eliminated from user accessible storage.'

    I don't really get what your complaint is here. The summary seems pretty accurate, especially for slashdot.

    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
    1. Re:the article says 13GB and almost half by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      A quick scan through the other comments shows at least 17 references to "13GB = windows bloat!" or some variant comparing it to a few gigs of the latest Android or iPad. I didn't feel like replying to all of them.

    2. Re:the article says 13GB and almost half by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the OS is so likely to crap on itself that the designers deem it necessary to add an extra copy of it on a recovery partition, then it means that the recovery partition is necessary for operation and should be counted as part of the operating system.

  66. VFAT is still patented by tepples · · Score: 1

    I wonder to what extent the limitation of FAT support to read-only use was Microsoft's fault, as Microsoft owns the patent on how file names are stored in the FAT file system used on most SD cards. The "VFAT" patent probably won't expire for at least another three more years.

    1. Re:VFAT is still patented by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      I wonder to what extent the limitation of FAT support to read-only use was Microsoft's fault,

      Not a bit. You can write to the card when the XOOM is a USB disk, which means all the code necessary to do writes is on the hardware. It's just mounted read-only under Android. A conscious decision from Google to limit the usefulness of the device.

  67. Re:A Comparison: Free Storage IPad, Android, Surfa by terjeber · · Score: 1

    I don't think I have read an article full of so much lies and bullshit since Mitt Romney's last speech. Sorry, but what the fuck has that article writer been drinking? Bleach? The pathetic attempt at comparison is absurd, and just full of outright lies. Sad. "Surface without any apps. - 15G free." Are you joking? No apps? Please stop lying.

    "The surface is ... much slower at everything". Yeah, great comparison. Please forgive me for ignoring morons with unsubstantiated claims. Someone poisoned this dudes Cool Aid with some serious hallucinogenics.

  68. What else do you use storage for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what's wrong with software using almost half the storage? What else would it be used for?

    Oh wait, was it a really badly written headline meaning the OS uses half the storage?

  69. 13 gigs of what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i made a minimal jellybean build for droid, and the system part is 140megs
    with tablet resolution imgs and all the bells and whistles it would probably take 512megs
    largest lib is libwebcore at 13megs, dsp codecs take up 13, apps average around 2mb each.

    Seriously 13gb for a tablet class OS and a few progs is just really inefficient.

  70. Well gosh by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    I guess they don't ignore me like they say they do. Either that or the revalation was entirely promted by Microsoft's high corporate ethics standards. That said, it is still wrong, the one I tested had 15.0GB free, not 16. I guess MS didn't want to admit they have LESS than half of their storage free.

    And I didn't even mention the impending service packs, patches, and related bloat. WART is going to be a disaster...... No, it is out, WART _IS_ a disaster.

                        -Charlie

  71. Built-in apps usage by dgharmon · · Score: 1

    "After taking into account Windows RT, Microsoft Office, built-in apps, and Windows recovery tools, nearly 13 GB of the available space is eliminated from user accessible storage"

    I have a 4GB usb device with the full system taking up 712kb storage ... Ubuntu usb-creator

    --
    AccountKiller
  72. Lack of class drivers by tepples · · Score: 1

    This is 'Windows' we are talking about

    No, it's Windows RT. Microsoft reserves the right to leave out drivers for strategic reasons.

    Plus for most of the USB devices (like thumb driver, external HDD, Digi Camera, keyboard, mouse, etc.) Windows doesn't need particular driver, there are class drivers

    Some operating systems leave out even class drivers for particular classes. For example, a thumb drive, an SD card reader, an external hard drive, and a digital camera are examples of devices that conform to the USB mass storage device class. But to mount a USB mass storage device on a Nexus 7 tablet running Android OS, you need to root it and install StickMount, and I seem to remember reading that a rooted tablet can't run certain applications such as Netflix.

  73. Why so Surprised? by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    I guess nobody here has ever worked with Windows CE and all of the variants? Windows-RT will be bloated for quite awhile and it will eventually die, like CE or be reborn as something else like Windows Mobile or WP7/8 or something else. The nice thing about Android or iOS for that matter is a clean sheet approach and you can get away from all those old nasty Windows XP or Windows 95 things that you still have to support because people expect you to. Right now I'm laughing at folks who spurn Windows 8 in general and give the "I'll wait to SP1" crap. If you're technical, jump on in, the water's fine and like Windows-RT it works. My biggest annoyance has been placing the tiles where I say to place them and stop moving them you annoying.. anyway..

    Yeah, it's a bit bloated but that's what MSFT needs too, is people pointing to it like Nelson and saying "Ha Ha!" That way, like the fat kid in school he'll either get straight, become obsessed with getting back at those who laughed, eventually climbing a tower with a high power rifle and shooting indiscriminately, or he'll go back and have another twinkie and start writing code and working on things like math and science and stuff. In MSFT's case I can't see Ballmer climbing a tower so they'll just eat another twinkie and push for the next generation of NAND storage just in Ballmer's case skip the math and science stuff.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  74. Microsoft again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is a disaster. I really prefer an Android tablet.

  75. Some size values (unscientific) by Lokitoth · · Score: 2

    So I have been trying to figure out what on earth is taking up the 13GB, and here is what I have so far:

    Recovery and EFI partitions - 4.0 GB There are two recovery and one system partitions. The system partition appears to be there for EFI. Pagefile.sys and Swapfile.sys - 2.6 GB Virtual Memory! Program Files - 1.0 GB This is mostly Office, with a few other things thrown in: IE, Windows Contacts, Photo Viewer, etc. Office occupies about 630MB Windows/System32 - 1.75 GB This is the core of the OS Windows/Fonts - 400 MB Some really large font-files here, but Windows does ship to a huge international audience with complex script support. Windows/Speech - 400 MB Speech Recognition and Text-to-Speech. Windows/IME - 200 MB This is the support for inputting complex scripts among other things. Dominated by Japanese, Simplified and Traditional Chinese. Windows/Microsoft.NET - 200 MB .NET framework

    I also have about 800 MB in a SoftwareDistribution folder, but that may be tainted by Windows Update (there were patches available on the first day, literally, weighing in at 600+ MB - for the Office update to RTM among others). Another curiosity is that there is a 10 MB SysWOW64 folder for some reason. Aside, I have not checked how big the system registry hives are.

    My user folder is about 2.0 GB, most of which is in Windows Store apps. Still trying to find a way to visualize how much each application takes.

    So far that adds up to 10.55 GB (11.35 if including SoftwareDistribution). I have purposely left out the WinSxS folder, because I have no way to telling what its real on-disk footprint is until I figure out how to scan a folder for hard links, which may not be possible on WindowsRT.

  76. nice article by ukashtrkart · · Score: 1

    ipad is the Wonderful work! This is the type of information that should be shared around the internet. Shame on the search engines for not positioning this post higher! Come on over and visit my website . Thanks =) wax ester ukash

    --
    ukash
  77. Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You didn't respond to the point, which is that you *can* attach external media. And you can't do that with the iPad.

    Apologies! The point was simply wrong, I guess why I skipped over it.

    You can read media off an SD card (or other devices that mount via USB) on an iPad using the camera connection kit.

    Surface wins on this functionality checkbox.

    The functionality is the same, the surface makes it slightly more convenient.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by Kielistic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having to buy and carry around an add-on is functionally the same to you? And only "slightly" less convenient?

      The more misleading drivel I read from you the more convinced I become that you are Slashdot's best troll ever; Poe's law in action. It is solid platform for a Slashdot troll.

    2. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Having to buy and carry around an add-on is functionally the same to you? And only "slightly" less convenient? Does the Surface get more storage without having to buy anything?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    3. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by Kielistic · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Hardly larger than an SD card? Who cares? The microSD card fits inside my phone and any other device that takes an SD card.
      I'm not sure why pointing out that having to purchase a $30 add-on that hangs out of a device (in other words cannot be left in all the time) makes me an "android folk". Android is not even in the discussion so you can relax- the boogeyman isn't out to get you here.

      I am terribly sorry if the truth offends you; a hard life is in store for you I fear.

      Not quite sure what that really means. You seeming like a troll doesn't hurt my feelings at all.

      It's a little hard to understanding[sic*] how pointing out a fact is misleading.

      I'm fairly certain you know exactly why it is misleading but I will spell it out anyway. The Surface has an SD slot. I could plug an extra N gigabytes of additional space into it and forget about it. The iPad does not. The iPad apparently has an add-on called a "camera connection kit" made to load pictures which appears to also allow loading other media as well. This is not plug in and forget. This is: "hope you remembered to bring it when you feel the urge to use it". Most people do not even know this exists; fewer would use it.
      I know somebody poked fun at an iPad's lack of expandable storage but it was not a personal attack against you. You are not an iPad. You know what people mean when they talk about expandable storage. You know the iPad does not have it in the same sense. Nonchalantly claiming the iPad has expandable storage is a lie of omission.

    4. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by SuperKendall · · Score: 0

      The Surface has an SD slot. I could plug an extra N gigabytes of additional space into it and forget about it

      No you cannot just forget about it. You can't put applications on it. You have to remember to save media to it separately. The only misleading going on is people like yourself pretending it is equivalent to buying a device with more space to start with, when it is in fact inferior in a number of ways and requires more user management. The fact that on an iPad you must also plug it in is just one more step of additional management, but you have already gone down that road with an SD card in any device.

      This is: "hope you remembered to bring it when you feel the urge to use it"

      The only time such expansion really matters is for something like a long trip with spotty access to data connections, so in the end that difference does not really matter much. Otherwise an iOS device basically caches from a much larger pool of data so the actual storage space on your device does not matter a great deal, as long as it's beyond a comfortable base level to hold the applications you need - a fact equally true of the Surface.

      I know somebody poked fun at an iPad's lack of expandable storage but it was not a personal attack against you.

      Of course not. But neither is it a good idea to let people spout inaccuracies lest a person for whom an iPad would truly be a better choice, be misled.

      You might be OK misleading people even in jest; I am not. I want people to know how things work so they can intelligently decide between devices.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    5. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by Kielistic · · Score: 4, Informative

      You might be OK misleading people even in jest; I am not. I want people to know how things work so they can intelligently decide between devices.

      You say that but your post history shows the opposite. You clearly aim to mislead people when you say the iPad supports expandable storage. You are always sure to fully articulate any shortcoming in another product:

      No you cannot just forget about it. You can't put applications on it. You have to remember to save media to it separately.

      You cannot do that on an iPad so this is not a pro/con list between the two devices. Neither do this. Nor does it change the fact that once my SD card is in the device I can forget about it.
      You always overlook the shortcomings of any Apple implementation:

      You swap some data out to external storage, just as Microsoft recommends.

      You already know for a fact Microsoft does not recommend you buy a dongle so you can temporarily plug in an SD card. If it was the other way around and Microsoft's tablet required a dongle we both know you would be proclaiming how terrible of an experience that is.

      The only time such expansion really matters is for something like a long trip with spotty access to data connections, so in the end that difference does not really matter much.

      Just plain false. Cell data is expensive (and only available on a small percentage of tablets) and wifi is in no way ubiquitous enough in most of the world to make "the cloud" a viable alternative to local storage.

    6. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by Kielistic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I post facts; you post facts but omit the whole story. ... It's hardly misleading when it does in fact do exactly that.

      When I buy an iPad can I plug in my SD card? No? You mean you omitted the part about needing to buy an additional dongle?

      You keep insisting you cannot do something that you can; why would you state something so plainly false? It would reduce trust of your views in the anyone reading your posts.

      Can you or can you not install apps to an SD card on an iPad? Without Jailbreaking (we'll assume for a second the user knows they need a "camera connection kit" and does not think it is a ridiculous requirement).

      You are wrong. Cell data is not that expensive; but more importantly in everyday life WiFi is pervasive.

      Cell data is expensive. Denying that is asinine. Wifi is not pervasive in any useful measure. It may almost always be present but it is not very helpful to have an encrypted AP. Yes I have wifi at home and at work but both of those places my tablet is really only going to be used as a remote control. Where are the number one spots media on a tablet is useful? Probably trains, buses, bus stops, malls. Some of those will have wifi, some of them will have poor quality wifi and most of them will have no wifi. No matter what remote storage has degraded availability over local.

      I am not quite sure exactly what you are going on about "well off enough to buy a tablet" and their "networking environment". They really have nothing to do with each other. Large metropolitan areas occasionally have good wifi availability. More often than not, though, a few key points have wifi access here and there. I imagine you will find a small percentage of the united states has open wifi availability. You may only travel between work and your home but many people "well off enough to buy a tablet" probably leave their little city bubble and would like to listen to music while doing it.

      In any case I am more reassured now that you are a troll. Definitely one of the best (possibly the very best) I've seen on Slashdot so congrats on that. What concerns me is how often people agree with your most likely (hopefully) trolls. Troll on.

    7. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by oztiks · · Score: 1

      The same camera connection kit that has voltage issues that only reads specific files, the same camera connection kit that needs voltage hacks implemented to do anything useful with.

      Yeah dumb ass why aren't you using the camera connection kit!

    8. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The more misleading drivel I read from you the more convinced I become that you are Slashdot's best troll ever; Poe's law in action. It is solid platform for a Slashdot troll.

      You're giving him way too much credit. I have never laughed out loud at a SuperKendall post. I have shaken my head sadly a few times, but that hardly qualifies.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by Kartu · · Score: 1

      SD card is no different than a "different folder".
      Some OS-es allow some don't allow you to save data to it.

      Such expansion matters as long as "having more memory" matters.

      "Convenience" of Apple's way of charging 100$ per 16Gb of flash memory is "proved" by the raise of popularity of "wi-fi HDD"-s.

    10. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Ok, I've been reading this discussion, and it's simple: having the option of an SD slot on the device that is NOT a dongle is preferable to having to add a dongle to get SD access.
      Jeez, it's not that hard.

    11. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Duude... Just. Stop. Digging.

      Nor does it change the fact that once my SD card is in the device I can forget about it.

      Please explain how you can "forget about" a separate storage that you must manage. This I think is the most terrible of your deceptions, misleading people to think having an SD card is equivalent to more base storage. It is not true for any user, as it adds complexity to how you deal with media. I don't know if you are technically ignorant of this fundamental problem but it seems unlikely with this being Slashdot, so I can only assume you are being willfully deceptive as to this point.

      Okay, yer right wrong on that one, mate.

      I can only speak about what I know, so I will reference the (apparently evil IYO) Android platform, since I've never used a Surface device. For all the Android devices I own (phone, several tablets) as well as the devices I help others with (mostly Android phones), the 'external' storage is indeed plug-and-forget. It auto-mounts when the device is turned on, I can shift the bulk of most of my app storage to the SD card with no drop in usability for the apps in question, and as for media? I simply had to open my camera app settings and tell it to save to the external storage instead of local storage. My Gallery app has no problem parsing the external and internal storage together and showing me everything.

      As an added bonus, if I drop my phone under a truck or in a toilet, well my precious dog photos are stored on a nice, non-volatile, easily-removeable microSD card. I have a high probability of being able to get them back even if I don't happen to have immediate access to teh internets, and I can copy them back over to my netbook in about 2 minutes.

      Or, I can just retrieve them from ONLINE_CLOUD_STORAGE_PROVIDER of my choice (Dropbox, Google Drive, SkyDrive, etc, etc, etc, etc, etc...) if it happens when I am near my home WiFi. Yes, I do have to explicitly enable these backup services myself, but I actually prefer that to trusting 'the man' to do it for me. I back up what (and only what) I want to back up.

      Just plain false. Cell data is expensive

      You are wrong. Cell data is not that expensive; but more importantly in everyday life WiFi is pervasive. I have only a 2GB data plan but consume around 100-200 GB a month between two iOS devices.

      I come nowhere near the limits of my data plan each month.

      Again, you are trying to mislead by ignoring how real people use real devices.

      Wow, privileged much? So, where do you live, Seoul? Tokyo? I'm sorry to burst your bubble, but unless you live in a metropolis, WiFi availability is most certainly *not* 'pervasive'. Where I live, I cannot travel from my home to my work without losing the (supposedly city-wide) crappy 'free' WiFi signal almost as soon as I leave either place. And since the speed of it is a joke, it's not even worth it to try, usually.

      I like to use my devices on the go, and since I'm in Canada (and not Vancouver or Toronto), that means anything that's delivered over the air comes directly off my cell data plan. And in case you haven't heard, us Canucks pay through the nose for mobile data, especially roaming data.

      Wifi is in no way ubiquitous enough in most of the world to make "the cloud" a viable alternative to local storage.

      You go broad when you should go narrow. Sure if I am traveling across Africa WiFi might be harder to come by (having travelled there though you might be surprised). But In that case pre-loading an SD card before leaving home and is the same degree of trouble for iOS and Surface, and the dongle is hardly an issue to bring in an area where power will be more precious than anything.

      But the people that actually can afford to buy a surface or iPad? You are in

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    12. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      I can only speak about what I know, so I will reference the (apparently evil IYO) Android platform

      I never said Android was evil, nor have I an issue with that platform.

      In fact I also own an Android phone I use for testing things...

      Where I live, I cannot travel from my home to my work without losing the (supposedly city-wide) crappy 'free' WiFi signal almost as soon as I leave either place.

      But mostly people are loading media where they work or live. Point, me.

      I have travelled all over the world and not had an issue getting WiFi if I needed it.

      Perhaps you should get out more and think about how people really use devices.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    13. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by CCarrot · · Score: 2

      Where I live, I cannot travel from my home to my work without losing the (supposedly city-wide) crappy 'free' WiFi signal almost as soon as I leave either place.

      But mostly people are loading media where they work or live. Point, me.

      I have travelled all over the world and not had an issue getting WiFi if I needed it.

      Perhaps you should get out more and think about how people really use devices.

      How well does that work for you on road trips? There's only so long that I can linger over a mochachino at Starbucks before going completely mental...and I am absolutely not anal (or, admittedly, organized) enough to pre-plan my entire road trip playlist beforehand! Me, I just pack along extra SD cards with more songs/videos from my library instead...a quick swap and I'm chilling to classic rock instead of alternative, or watching sci-fi instead of comedy.

      I can only cite how I use my devices, and AFAIK that's for pretty much the typical things people use devices for: playing music and video, taking and looking at pics and (of course!) playing absorbing little games. Oh, and reading ebooks, although those don't really add to the storage crunch at all, being so relatively tiny.

      My phone is used mostly to surf the interweb, youtube, email, twitter (but not FB, eww), etc., and with that, I still typically use well over 2 GB a month of my 5GB plan. I couldn't even imagine what I would be pulling if my music and video came from the cloud instead...yikes.

      Oh yes, you definitely don't live in Australia or New Zealand, do you? Friends and I took a trip down that-a-way a couple of years ago, and let me tell you, unless you really like McDonalds and StarryBucks, there's no such thing as free wifi anywhere. Heck, all of the hotels and campsites we stayed at had a charge-by-time or (usually) charge-by-MB access fee to use their WiFi. The airports charged for the wifi, fer chrissake. It really sucked, since I brought some shiny toys along and planned on Skype'ing back home fairly regularly, but we hardly ever could (you know how much data Skype uses? it's goofy) I'm just glad for those SD cards, or we would have gone batty listening to the same 30 albums or so...I know, I know, FWP :)

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    14. Re:Yes you CAN attach external media with an iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      News flash - most non-nerds never need anywhere near as much storage as even the cheapest iPad 1 offers. If you need an sd card device, go buy one. Most people don't and Apple isn't losing any sleep worrying about random slahdot geek's desire to use sd cards.

  78. In comparison by devent · · Score: 1

    In comparison my full blown Fedora Linux 64 bit installation is using 7.8GB. That is the system + a bunch of applications like Office, Firefox, Gimp, development tools, Wine, tools, some games.

    I LOLed quite hard when I saw how much hard disk a blank (i.e. only the system) Windows Vista installation was using. Something like 8GB only for an empty system. I run a check and saw that most of the space is used by DLLs in 10 times duplicates.

    My guess is Microsoft is extra blowing the system up so a) they can say more is better and b) to slow down illegal downloads of Windows.

    --
    http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    1. Re:In comparison by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      It's probably of consequence of first getting into the DLL hell, and then facilitating a "culture" of solving it in a way that defeated the purpose, with each application bringing copies of ostensibly common DLLs into its own installation. Later, Microsoft created a more intelligent solution with SxS. It's a bit of how Unix shared libraries are installed side by side and differentiated by sonames, except there was no pressure of trying to assert a stable ABI between two library builds (in SxS the full version number is used as a search key). The result is that there are still way too many DLL copies installed, which are not really all different in ABI and behavior. And still a lot of third-party developers do the dumb bring-you-own-DLLs thing because it works best for them, the tragedy of commons notwithstanding, and there is no way to enforce less wasteful software distribution policies because there is no control over what an application installer can do.

      To think of it, this is where a curated marketplace with strict acceptance guidelines might actually help.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
    2. Re:In comparison by devent · · Score: 1

      That is all good and well, except it does not explain why a blank installation of Windows Vista/7 is using so much space. All software is coming from one software developer: Microsoft. It should be a matter of good policy that the DLLs in use are fixed company-wide (for save space, compatibility issues, security, etc).

      To think of it, this is where a curated marketplace with strict acceptance guidelines might actually help.

      No, just an software repository with open source libraries and applications. In Linux this is a none-issue and Linux do not have any guidelines or any other restrictions. Everyone is using the libraries of the system because it's a) easier then to maintain your own copy of the library and b) you get more users if your software is in the repository.

      I do not understand why Microsoft is not levering the big software repository of, for example, Debian. It would be a big win/win, if you have a repository with Apache, MySQL, SSH, the tools, editors, IDEs, etc. as easy in Windows as you have with f.e. Debian.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    3. Re:In comparison by 21mhz · · Score: 1

      No, just an software repository with open source libraries and applications. In Linux this is a none-issue and Linux do not have any guidelines or any other restrictions.

      Well, Fedora apparently does.

      Everyone is using the libraries of the system because it's a) easier then to maintain your own copy of the library and b) you get more users if your software is in the repository.

      Also, you get pilloried if you ever break the ABI of a library in the repository without changing the soname. So everybody learns to play nice and keep backward compatibility, package older versions for legacy applications, and so on.
      But it used to be much worse: I remember when a zlib vulnerability was discovered, a symbol name search through a repository shown it to be replicated in 20 or so statically linked copies in various packages, all of which needed to be patched ASAP. No wonder why Fedora is adamant on reducing the number of library clones.

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  79. Re:32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays by occasional_dabbler · · Score: 1

    My ZX80 didn't have a hard drive. It had 1KB of RAM and a crappy cable to connect to an even crappier cassette deck!

    Now ALL of you get the heck off MY lawn

    --
    "Our opponent is an alien starship packed with atomic bombs," I said. "we have a protractor"
  80. Re:Its windows by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

    Office is probably half or more of that.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  81. Re:32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

    Hell, most people around here probably don't even know that the 5.25" drive slot we have today are actually half height... my first computer was an XT with an MFM hard drive so slow it actually ran faster double-spaced.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  82. Exactly by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    but with 10gb open on my N7 don't miss it too much

    If you simply buy the device ahead of time with a bit of extra space, it really does not get in the way - it's so easy to swap in and out media that really you mostly have to factor the size of the applications you like to use plus a decent buffer for games/media.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  83. Glad to see they've included recovery tools. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    You're going to need them.

  84. They just need to make sure the SD card is... by elabs · · Score: 1

    ...a first class citizen. Apps, music, pictures, videos, etc. all need to be able to reside on the memory card and work the same.

  85. Why not add the extra ram by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft would have been different if they had 32gb of useable space & put their os on a 20-32gb partition. It would have cost what a extra $30-50 tops, and for the $499 that it starts off at, should have enough in there to be different.

    But they are not.

  86. Re:Its windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why the hell would I need a recovery partition on there all the time...

    oh...

    That will probably be the Surface tablet's most-used feature.

    It's too bad it doesn't have a microSD slot. It could come with a recovery partition on a card that you could pay extra for.

  87. Why? by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    A portable computer with a screen and a keyboard for > $600 is called a laptop. I don't think you can even buy a laptop anymore with a 64 GB hard drive even if you were drunk enough to want one.

    U get less cpu, less software choice (no windows apps run on it), less ram, less storage...and why???

    By the time MS awakens from their batshit insanity it will be too late.

  88. What's new? by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Ever tried to remove google maps, you tube, more shit and yahoo finance from your android thing?

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  89. When you're here, you're family by tepples · · Score: 1

    It has to be a restaurant now?

    Or any other well-known place with open Wi-Fi that's not your home.

    Damn Apple and its walled Olive Garden.

    Cute :-)

  90. 13GB??? Wait until... by bigwavedave33 · · Score: 1

    13GB used just by the initial install??? Wait until service pack 3!

  91. Two sides to that coin. by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    they call it the usb port on surface, and its included in the sale price.

    In other words, the Surface is more expensive than it has to be for millions of people who do not need a USB port built in.

    I never said it was not extra on the iPad. Just that the iPad can in fact do what you and others claim it cannot.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Two sides to that coin. by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      everybody needs a usb port. if you dont need a usb port, you dont need a tablet. you need a tv.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  92. It's not a storage device by PensivePeter · · Score: 1

    Why would you store anything except the last couple of movies, recent photographs, videos and documents? It is designed for efficiently managing and working with current but transitory content. If you want storage, connect it to a homegroup (2 clicks), acquire a storage device or home server.

  93. wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Holy cow, that's huge... By comparison, Apple iDevices use about 2.5GB for iOS. I know Windows is a hog, but damn.

  94. All patented processes happen on the host PC by tepples · · Score: 1

    You can write to the card when the XOOM is a USB disk, which means all the code necessary to do writes is on the hardware.

    When an Android device is acting as a USB mass storage device, it processes requests from the host computer to read and write 512-byte blocks on the SD card. All file system processes, such as the patented method of writing to VFAT, are happening on the host computer. Thus, the Android device performs no patented processes in this mode.

  95. Re:32GB? That's like booting off a floppy nowadays by bfandreas · · Score: 1

    I remember my first HD. It had the handy form factor of a shoe box. It needed an external power supply. It made a most frightful racket. It weighed a ton. And it did hold a whopping 10MB.

    Not many of us can claim their first computer was a 640k, 16 color, 2 floppy, 10MB HD Decision Mate V. That's NCR. In the early 80ies a computer deal with Iran fell through(for some reason or another...it's got something to do with changing the name of the country from Persia to Iran and them snubbing Jimmy Carter) leaving NCR stranded with storehouses full of those amazing machines. My dad having worked for 15 years for those bozos nabbed one of them. Well, he payed 600 deutschmarks for it and got one for his son. My fate was sealed ever since.

    Thanks, dad. I could have been a literature scholar if it hadn't been for you. Hrumph.

    --
    20 minutes into the future
  96. Very few people need USB by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    everybody needs a usb port.

    For what?

    Keyboard: Bluetooth.
    Printing: WIFi
    Data Transfer:WiFi/Cell data

    Even for loading images with an EyeFi card I don't need to plug in a card, or I get images over the network from my iPhone.

    I have a USB adaptor but I only use it for loading images from a DSLR, a specialized need that I would not claim more than a tiny fraction of users need.

    Here's a thought: Not every person on earth needs to plug in a 300 baud serial coupling modem you still have via a serial port to USB adaptor. Not that such a thing would work on Surface either...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Very few people need USB by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      flash drives. cameras. phones. kindles. mouse. keyboard. printer. external hdd. hi quality speakers. charging various thingies. arduino. every single thing i just wrote needs usb. every single peripheral is supported by the surface. bluetooth keyboards suck and are needlessly expensive. my super awesome mouse needs usb. i have never in my life come across a printer that does not work with usb. cellular/wifi are not comparable with the kind of data transfer you get with a simple usb flash drive. what the fuck is an eyefi?? never seen/heard of it. my cameras have sd cards, for which i have a usb reader. my phone has a microusb interface, and a microsd card, both of which are supported by the surface.
      in conclusion, there is absolutely no reasonable alternative to usb. everything else is a compromise.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
  97. Every 8-64 bit system? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I also have (almost) the entire libraries of every 8-64 bit video game system stored on it.

    Including Final Fantasy VII, Final Fantasy VIII, and Final Fantasy IX for the 32-bit PlayStation? Those alone are more than a gig each.

  98. the apps are available, just download again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Each country allow redownload of all items available in the individual store, here i denmark there are no american tv-series, yet other programs are possible to download, and i have redownloaded apps i purchased in finland:

    YOUR OLD PURCHASES ARE INVISIBLE IN THE PURCHASED LIST, YET YOU CAN STILL DOWNLOAD THEM FOR FREE BY SELECTING EACH APP IN THE STORE!!

    From the iOS rules:
    5) After you change countries, you will no longer receive application update notifications in iTunes for the apps you purchased in your original country. However, you'll still receive update notifications on your iOS device for any applications installed on it. In addition, you'll be able to download previously purchased applications again for free if they are available on your new country's store. You will not be charged and the download will not appear on your Purchased page. If a previously purchased application is not available in your new country, you will not be able to download it again for free.

    1. Re:the apps are available, just download again by Psyborgue · · Score: 1

      Yet that's not true. Not in my case. It might have been true before but it's not true any longer. I tried searching for "App A" in the app store and it prompted me to purchase it. Tech support who I contacted also indicated I would have to re-purchase all the content. Also, even if the apps worked, that would only be a small fraction of my total content. To be fair the tech (and her supervisor) I talked to claimed they did try and make an exception (that the apps and data would be in my download queue if they were available in Country B and I could make a local backup), but when that failed, they told me I was SOL and would have to repurchase as they originally told me.

  99. age of slashdot readers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol, just read all these comments and realised that slashdot must be where all the geriatrics hangout :p

    But seriously, its Microbloat. Did people really expect anything different from baulmerware ? seriously ? :p

  100. Captain fail your friendly neighbourhood law guy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft says on its website that the 32GB Surface has 16GB of free space while the 64GB version has 45GB free.

    You Sir are a moron. Every single device on earth has the same issue. Next he will sue because no one told him 1gig is 1024mb not 1000mb.