Slashdot Mirror


Disney Replaces Longtime IT Staff With H-1B Workers

Lucas123 writes: Disney CEO Bob Iger is one of eight co-chairs of the Partnership for a New American Economy, a leading group advocating for an increase in the H-1B visa cap. Last Friday, the partnership was a sponsor of an H-1B briefing at the U.S. Capitol for congressional staffers. The briefing was closed to the press. One of the briefing documents obtained after the meeting stated, "H-1B workers complement — instead of displace — U.S. Workers." Last October, however, Disney laid off at least 135 IT staff (though employees say it was hundreds more), many of them longtime workers. Disney then replaced them with H-1B contractors that company said could better "focus on future innovation and new capabilities." The fired workers believe the primary motivation behind Disney's action was cost-cutting. "Some of these folks were literally flown in the day before to take over the exact same job I was doing," one former employee said. Disney officials promised new job opportunities as a result of the restructuring, but the former staff interviewed by Computerworld said they knew of few co-workers who had landed one of the new jobs. Use of visa workers in a layoff is a public policy issue, particularly for Disney. Ten U.S. senators are currently seeking a federal investigation into displacement of IT workers by H-1B-using contractors. Kim Berry, president of the Programmer's Guild, said Congress should protect American workers by mandating that positions can only be filled by H-1B workers when no qualified American — at any wage — can be found to fill the position."

636 comments

  1. Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    companies to run with minimal staff and still "produce" as much if not more than before. Yet we still run around with the fiction of the "work week" and a "career"... These concepts are obsolete. It's time for the leisure society with resources for all. To deny this is to say we don't have the technology to do so.

    Yet we have the technology to outsource everything. But this only benefits the few. If it benefits all, then it's wrong.

    1. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot to mention "basic income" anywhere in your leisure society pamphlet. Please try again.

    2. Re:Technology allows by bjwest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      companies to run with minimal staff and still "produce" as much if not more than before. Yet we still run around with the fiction of the "work week" and a "career"... These concepts are obsolete. It's time for the leisure society with resources for all. To deny this is to say we don't have the technology to do so.

      Yet we have the technology to outsource everything. But this only benefits the few. If it benefits all, then it's wrong.

      We may have the technology, but we don't have the resources. Unless something is done about the population growth, whether or not we fix the climate change, we are done for and we'll take 99.9% of the remaining species with us. I wonder what the next civilization on this planet, or the ETs that find it, will think when they start digging up our artefacts.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    3. Re:Technology allows by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Funny

      Holy shit they made porn out of EVERYTHING!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:Technology allows by Chibi+Merrow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually you seem to be missing the obvious: Improving the standard of living of everyone will solve the population growth problem for us. The only countries where the population is still growing like crazy are where the vast majority of citizens are poor and uneducated. Once people get a little bit of education and the ability to enjoy leisure time, they funnily enough stop having kids.

      --
      Maxim: People cannot follow directions.
      Increases in truth directly with the length of time spent explaining them
    5. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure,why not? Although what does "income" even mean when we have the means we do?

    6. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pretty sure that a few mansions (and their contents) could be appropriated from the corporate executives in order to provide a life of leisure for the displaced workers

    7. Re:Technology allows by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 3

      Yes, having large families is a strategy for providing elder care when the parents are uncertain if their progeny will survive to adulthood

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    8. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      companies to run with minimal staff and still "produce" as much if not more than before. Yet we still run around with the fiction of the "work week" and a "career"... These concepts are obsolete. It's time for the leisure society with resources for all. To deny this is to say we don't have the technology to do so.

      Yet we have the technology to outsource everything. But this only benefits the few. If it benefits all, then it's wrong.

      Do you ever wonder where your food comes from, how it is processed, and how it gets to your plate?
      Did you ever wonder how the building you live in got there? Was it always there, or did someone make it? How did they do that?

      The things we really need and care about are still largely made by hand, and there is no reasonable technological replacement on the horizon. And, yes I'm aware of the 3D printed houses. They look like someday they may serve as a replacement the homes found in trailer parks.

    9. Re:Technology allows by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...we don't have the resources.

      Absolute nonsense. We just manage them poorly.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    10. Re:Technology allows by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      You mean sort of like communism?
      Nobody needs a job, technology can do it all!

      Who builds the technology? Who keeps it running? Why would someone want to even learn how to do that, when they could just live a life of leisure instead? How do you stop people fucking all the time without regard because everyone gets a free ride and over populating the planet?

    11. Re:Technology allows by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      The only countries where the population is still growing like crazy are where the vast majority of citizens are poor and uneducated.

      And at the Duggar home.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    12. Re:Technology allows by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      Population growth in advanced countries is negative, as in seriously negative.

      Even countries like Mexico are seeing theirs drop off. Mexico had a birth rate around 6.7 per female in 1970, today it's something like 2.2 (lower than where the US was in 1970). Now, there are still undeveloped countries in the world that have high population growth, but introduce just a smidgen of modern family planning options and medicine, and you'll see the same results.

      We've got a lot of problems on planet Earth, but runaway population growth isn't going to be one of them. If anything, it's going to be the opposite, or more specifically, the economic consequences of shrinking workforces.

    13. Re: Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I talked to a woman from Kuwait who is going to school here in the US. She said the average family there has at 8 kids because the government pays for everything, so why not. She has 3 kids, and while she is in the US her government pays not only for her school but for her medical, the apartment and her kids private school. That is a wealthy country with large families. I was also surprised by her perfect English and complete lack of accent.

    14. Re:Technology allows by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      How do you stop people fucking all the time without regard because everyone gets a free ride and over populating the planet?

      Oh! Yay! I got one!

      You force people to get sterilized after they have 2 kids. Remember, it's Communism, so no individual rights.

      Communo-techno-utopia would be awesome, man. Just like any utopia.

      And I program stuff even when no one pays me to, so I imagine I would program stuff even when no one pays me to in a techno-utopia. I'm not the only one who loves programmers. It would be a bunch of part-timers doing it for love, probably.

      But we're probably 200 years away or more from being able to live in a techno-utopia :(

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    15. Re:Technology allows by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      I'm not the only one who loves programmers.

      lawl that should be "loves programming".

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    16. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL

    17. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like India were the degrees are fake?

    18. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously a DNC member. Always so funny how you fucking Democrats love to control everything in the world except whether 12-year olds need to report their rapists while they're getting a abortion.

    19. Re: Technology allows by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I was also surprised by her perfect English and complete lack of accent.

      Umm, that's like what happens when you like learn English in a formal setting, rather then umm, learning it, from you know, like on the street.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    20. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not? These mansions were possible thanks to new tools, inventions and discoveries by engineers and scientists that reduced costs and increased production. Why should these scientists and engineers and the rest of the world live by scraping barely while executives reap almost perpetual profits off the work of someone else?

    21. Re:Technology allows by hjf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Once people get a little bit of education and the ability to enjoy leisure time, they funnily enough stop having kids

      Are you joking? People in "educated" countries don't "stop having kids" because they're educated. They stop having kids because they're "focusing on their careers". If there is no "career" to focus on, what keeps you from having kids?
      People in rich countries don't have kids because they're TOO BUSY WORKING.
      People in poor countries have lots of kids because THEY'RE UNEMPLOYED (or underemployed) and guess what? the only fun thing they can afford is fucking their wife.

    22. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny bit that for the most part in the first world countries, the overall population is declining.
      In the US, the native US population is declining overall with the actual increase coming from people traveling here from other countries.

      As other nations were actually brought up to our levels of civilization where they have more to entertain themselves then sex and other cheap activities while also having the education and resources for birth control there is no reason to think their overall population wouldn't decline some as well.

      At which point the overpopulation problem would effectively fix itself and may even, in the long term, turn into a under population problem in the centuries to come.

      Trying to drag the US and other first world nations into 3rd world living conditions which we are trying to do now instead of actively maintaining them while trying to pull the rest of the world up to our levels is actually a good deal of what is causing the overpopulation when much of the world lacks access to proper education or birth control and too much of the world is too broke or broken to do much while sex is still cheap fun available to even the poorest of people.,

    23. Re: Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kind of funny how you jackass republicans always say you want government out of people's lives but you try to control everyone's private behavior on your road to try to establish a theocracy in the US.

      The only thing you get government out of the way of is corporations stealing from the citizens of this country. Then of course you use our military to help them steal from the rest of the world.

    24. Re:Technology allows by MrKaos · · Score: 2

      Holy shit they made porn out of EVERYTHING!

      Mirror Mirror on the Wall, who has the naughtiest porn of all!!

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    25. Re:Technology allows by Adriax · · Score: 4, Funny

      "With pouty lips and an amazing rack, Blow White is the naughtiest in the sack."

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    26. Re:Technology allows by MrKaos · · Score: 2

      "With pouty lips and an amazing rack, Blow White is the naughtiest in the sack."

      "Oh Mr Disney, can you explain what rule 34 is? Is it a happy ending?"

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    27. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. Also, good social programs to take care of elders make it possible not to have kids at all and still not be scared stiff of getting old. Good or bad, you decide, but it does work like that. Scandic countries are a proof of this. They are actually "fixing" the "problem" of population not growing by shipping loads of immigrants in. (and gaining different problems, because their cultures aren't suiten to take in so much foreigners at a time).

    28. Re:Technology allows by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      They will find a fresh McDonalds bun next to the fossilized remains of a human.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    29. Re:Technology allows by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Aaaand, they have no internets or other entertainment. Fucking IS the entertainment. Basically what you said.

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    30. Re: Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel the same. Are you going to accuse me of being a democrat? What makes you think I've ever stepped foot in the USA?

    31. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not? Because if the wealthy keep all the wealth to themselves, they will be even more wealthy.
      Let's not forget that the average corporate executive is a functioning psychopath; they would hurt people not merely for their own good, but for the sheer joy of doing so.

    32. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A source close to Disney indicated that the layoff\b\b\b\b\b\brestructuring was because of piratings and fairies..."

    33. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, as we say about the cultures of yore: "they had a very well developed, very extensively disseminated cult of fertility"

    34. Re: Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean all those fertility idols we've been digging up were really some bronze-age man's whack stack?

    35. Re: Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read an interesting story the other day about a Taiwan-American woman who was raised in both countries. She spoke English fluently without an accent but when she was in school in Taiwan her parents noticed she was mispronouncing words when talking with her classmates.

      It turns out she did that because that's the way their teacher (mis)pronounced certain English words and as such the class was expected to (mis)pronounce them the same way or lose points.

    36. Re:Technology allows by itzly · · Score: 1

      We've got a lot of problems on planet Earth, but runaway population growth isn't going to be one of them

      Give it some time. Evolution needs to catch up to our new lifestyles. Even if the average couple has 1.8 children, you can find families with 4 children, and families with 0. All the families with 0 children will not pass their genes, and families with 4 children will pass 4 copies. Any genetic influence on higher number of children grows exponentially.

    37. Re:Technology allows by Tyrannicsupremacy · · Score: 0

      Then why are there so many hispanic and black families in a developed country like America who keep having children beyond their means because our "first world society" will pick up the check for them? Maybe it's not just about the countries they come from, but the people themselves?

      --
      http://i.cubeupload.com/T6cyLu.png
    38. Re:Technology allows by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      We have the resources to support 9 to 10 billion people for a while (and there's good reasons why they think it will top out there) but the quality of life for many will be much lower.

      I don't think population will top out there. I think the part of the population which has a high breeding rate will come to dominate the population and population growth will resume.

      So yea-- I think we are pretty much doomed to a multi-billion die off event sometime in the next 100 years.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    39. Re:Technology allows by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      I aam firmly persuaded that the most effective birth-control device of all time is the large-screen television.

      "Honey, should we have another kid? No, we won't be able to afford the new 65-inch model."

    40. Re:Technology allows by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The fertility rate in Bangladesh has fallen to nearly 2, from a high of around 9 in the 1960s. There are still a lot of people in Bangladesh who don't have careers, they are just farmers or labourers with no real prospects. What has changed is that there was a sustained, long term effort to educate people about contraception and women's rights. Women are now more involved in family planning and both genders have a better understanding of it.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    41. Re:Technology allows by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you joking? People in "educated" countries don't "stop having kids" because they're educated. They stop having kids because they're "focusing on their careers". If there is no "career" to focus on, what keeps you from having kids? People in rich countries don't have kids because they're TOO BUSY WORKING. People in poor countries have lots of kids because THEY'RE UNEMPLOYED (or underemployed) and guess what? the only fun thing they can afford is fucking their wife.

      Poor countries tend to have a hjigher birthrate because they have higher infant and child mortality rates due to unsanitary conditions and a lack of access to adequate medical care. Also, employment in poor countries tends to be almost exclusively manual work such as farming, simple manufacturing (textiles, etc), or even scavenging. These types of jobs pay very little, so the more kids you have, the more income your family can bring in and the more likely you are to not starve to death.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    42. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No--look at population statistics from many European countries. Nordic countries in particular have a very high standard of living (including a legislated capped work week) and they still are having fewer children than average. I suspect you live in America, which is why you have an inaccurate perception that everyone with a high standard of living is too busy working.

      Being busy doesn't stop people from having kids. It keeps people from taking care of them properly, and that's not typically a deterrent for those on the lower end of the wage spectrum.

    43. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People in rich countries have kids when they want. People in poor countries worry weather they can afford them or how they can use them to make more money. Which country are you in?

    44. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has been shown, the more educated the WOMAN, the fewer the children. The Muslims understand this at a gut level, that is why they burn schools that teach girls. The solution to poverty is to teach STEM and especially MATH to poor girls.
      100 boys - 100 girls.
      You teach 99 boys to wait until marriage, you still can have 100 pregnant girls.
      You teach 99 girls that there is a better life if they wait, you have 1 pregnant girl.

    45. Re:Technology allows by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 2

      Unless something is done about the population growth

      Absent immigration, population growth in the US is negative.

      Ditto Europe.

      And China.

      India isn't quite there yet, but their population growth rate has been steadily declining for most of my life.

      In other words, the Third World is the only place where population growth is an issue today. So, yes, we do have the resources....

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    46. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "People in poor countries have lots of kids because THEY'RE UNEMPLOYED (or underemployed) and guess what? the only fun thing they can afford is fucking their wife."

      That's exceedingly ignorant. They have kids for two main reasons, lack of contraceptives (either due to religious beliefs or cost), and the need for extra income and old age support. Those kids are often earning income, or otherwise supplying extra labour, from a very young age.

    47. Re:Technology allows by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I remember hearing that 9 months after a major power outage in some city, the population increased.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    48. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Career is what you make of it. I know plenty of folks who are too busy having experiences like traveling or volunteering to have kids. Similarly, I know at least a few people who are extremely career focused (in the traditional sense), and who have kids anyways.

      I would also suggest that the 'too busy working' argument doesn't necessarily work in Europe, where large segments of the working population have much more reasonable working conditions, i.e. generous vacation time, 35-40 hour workweeks, significant amounts of parental leave.

      Birth rate isn't necessarily tied uniquely to educational level and opportunity - culture and economy play a part - but it seems fairly strongly linked.

    49. Re:Technology allows by Bongo · · Score: 1

      I gather it is due to child survival. If one in six survive, you need to have twelve. As mothers start to see two in two survive, they start having two. It takes a while but that's the effect.

    50. Re: Technology allows by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you not paid attention to the statistics over the past two decades, but the number of black women having more than two children has dropped dramatically. live births dropped in proportion to increase of education and wealth. Maybe your racist ideas are just that.

    51. Re:Technology allows by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

      Yet more support for "The Idiocracy theory".

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    52. Re:Technology allows by jythie · · Score: 1

      Thing is, if current resources were passed around more evenly, the vast majority of the population would get a large increase in quality of life. A tiny percentage get nearly all the wealth (on a world level, it is something like 2% get 98%), so removing those top leeches would free up a huge amount of resources for everyone else.

    53. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw that movie

    54. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Should be 3 people per family. There are too many people who die before procreation, are unable/unwilling to reproduce, and it would hedge against a single event wiping out society by having positive pressure on population.

    55. Re:Technology allows by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      The 1% will never let the 99% have more than they legally have to....

    56. Re:Technology allows by guruevi · · Score: 2

      It's mainly access to birth control methods. It's not about being too busy working, farmers historically did manual labor for 10-12 hour days 7 days a week. Yet they all produced 10-12 offspring.

      In a lot of places religious cults and superstition (until this day the Catholic Church forbids the use of condoms and birth control) make it so there is a taboo on birth control. Once the population starts being educated and females are able to afford their own birth control methods, the reproduction rate drops. Still within our western society you can see that religious folks produce a heck of a lot more offspring than educated folks.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    57. Re:Technology allows by guruevi · · Score: 2

      Urban myth. There is no appreciable difference in population growth when there are power outages or even during winter.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    58. Re:Technology allows by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      "Once people get a little bit of education and the ability to enjoy leisure time, they funnily enough stop having kids."

      A stunning example (to me) Mexico. Super Catholic. Yet their insane population growth has abruptly dropped to 2 kids a family, in one generation. Damn. All it took was a little more money than utter poverty wages, exposure to outside ideas, and people fixed their own problem (in Mexico, that problem is overpopulation, over and out).

    59. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just described the US federal government to a tee.. and many of the state governments as well.

    60. Re:Technology allows by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Population growth always outgrows resources, if unchecked. That is mathematics.

      I agree about resource management. Even Heinlein agreed that it was poor management that caused poverty, even during overpopulation emergencies. However, and this is important, the type of management necessary is 180 degrees opposed to the type of government and libertarian business philosophy we are committed to. The management would have to be absolute and need overwhelming power over private interests, so we can't. We can't even build trains overland because the people who own the land want too much cash to make it affordable. We can't make people stop taking long showers during a drought emergency. We're not capable of submitting to an authority that would require sacrifices from us.

    61. Re:Technology allows by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      If you are a big organization. You have a lot of projects to go on. So if your organization is smart, you will have small teams working on each project. If the organization is stupid, then it has a large team working on a single project to try to get it done quicker.

      The problem is when the organization is stupid, and it has a big team working on a single project, they find that it becomes too expensive to progress so they don't see the value of the individual. if they get small teams They will see far more output and the value of these skilled individuals.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    62. Re:Technology allows by pr0fessor · · Score: 1

      I keep thinking that soon there will be another world war much larger than the previous ones where we can shed a few 100 million people and that although the news will give other reasons controlling population and resources will be big factor.

    63. Re:Technology allows by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Except that the problem already happened, and is happening. The wars, the pollution, the animal die-off, the climate change, ther rising oceans, even the srrveillance (why that is is too long to go into) is caused by reaction to: too damned many people. The slack off in population growth did not happen. China has dropped the ball and is now shooting towards three billion. The brakes will go on, one way or another, by the Four Horseman method or the by the new fifth Horseman named Intelligence riding his pink unicorn, but the catastrophe is ON and will be ongoing for a very, very long time.

    64. Re:Technology allows by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      The combination of shrinking workforce and extreme automation is going to be a hard one to get past. I suspect that economics are going to have to be completely rethought. Right off the top, simple questions arise, like how does one continue to grow a business when the potential marketplace is stagnant or even shrinking? When there's relatively solid population growth, there exist opportunities for businesses to grow without taking too much business away from other companies. But when your potential market is shrinking at half a percent per year, the nature of competition changes. Businesses are likely to shut down or go bankrupt more quickly, which reduces the employment level.

      I imagine that interim measures like mandatory, strictly-enforced hours caps will happen to try to prop up the job market, since one person doing 60 hours of work in a week can be roughly done by two people at 30 hours each, but those measures will only work for so long. I don't know if we're headed for a dystopia with even greater gaps between the haves and have-nots, or if our future is a more leisurely one where we're able to engage in lifestyles rarely considered by people since the dawn of civilization. I'd like to think that technology will advance to the point that we'll be able to experience the sensations associated with being rich more easily and maybe the draw to collect money to spend on things will fade.

      More likely is that it will be something that I cannot currently conceive. But since my life expectancy takes me out to somewhere around 2060, I expect I'll have a chance to see where things will go.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    65. Re:Technology allows by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      The draw of trailer homes is that they're cheap. You can get a fairly nice one for a few tens of thousands. The downside, of course, is that they're not built to be permanent: any significant storm can do enough damage to make them unlivable. When homes are 3D-printed, that will change as the homes become stable locations that can handle decades of weather, likely with fewer construction defects.

      We've had those kinds of areas before when the tract homes went up after WW2. I grew up in an area where about 90% of the homes had exactly the same layout, albeit mirrored from one house to the next to give a semblance of appearance of individuality. The remaining ones differed in being corner homes or a rare two-story house, and I think the extra stories were added later. This would be no different, except that they can probably be built more cheaply, bringing down the cost of home ownership (or maybe just raising the profits of homebuilders).

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    66. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for once again reminding me to NOT read the comments section on slashdot anymore.

    67. Re:Technology allows by scamper_22 · · Score: 1

      It's a complex answer as to why people have kids. It's different for different people.

      But the idea that the only reason people don't have lots of kids in rich countries is because of career is a little far fetched.

      Why not look at the reasons people have kids.

      1. To take care of them when they're older
      This is severely reduced in rich countries and would be even less so if we had some kind of guaranteed income. At best, you're doing it for the company, in which case 1-3 kids is plenty.

      2. For religious reasons.
      This one is valid and even in rich countries, you might still end up with a few large families. But that kind of very orthodox spread your seed kind of religiousness is on the decline.

      3. For someone to love them.
      Most parents I know find this out after the first kid. You don't have kids to fill the void in your life, because they have a lot of needs. Again, that's most people. You'll probably find the odd person with severe issues who just keeps popping em out.

      4. Because you want kids.
      Again, the first child is new and exciting. Then another and another. The novelty wears off for people.

      This all has to be balanced with the reality that kids are a lot of work. And if you had free time, there's so much you could do from sports, to travelling, to writing, reading, hobbies, or heck just wasting time on netflix or drinking.
      To top it all off, we're still limited by age, and the age of good pregnancy for women is not infinite. Say they finish school and have their fun by 26. They basically have 10-15 years to have their kids at best. That doesn't leave a lot of time to pop out lots of kids assuming you want to give the ones you have proper attention.

    68. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, having large families is a strategy for providing elder care when the parents are uncertain if their progeny will survive to adulthood

      Which isn't nearly as secure as Social Security, right? The problem facing the USA, and many other nations, is negative population growth. Without immigration, the USA population is actually shrinking and that's a problem for programs like Social Security. Fewer workers are paying for more retirees.

      Personally I think basic income is a solution, but we need to tax the businesses that profit from using H1-b visa holders.

    69. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. It's almost like the attitude of society matters or something.

    70. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most have X children because they need to feed clothe and EDUCATE them. Educated people realize that it costs money. Uneducated people are seriously ... STUPID.

    71. Re: Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution is to gas all muzzies. End of a lot of problems.

    72. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because who doesn't have even *more* sex with all that extra leisure time?

    73. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh.

      The primal reason for children is a fear of old age, and the resources needed to keep living. Children are essentially the innate instinct to lengthen the span...for you to give birth to more children.

      Once you remove the primal fear of old age, people naturally don't see children as necessary to retirement/living, and they reproduce less.

      Non of this is all that conscious to most (duggars excluded) of civilization.

    74. Re:Technology allows by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      It's time for the leisure society with resources for all.

      I think that's where we're headed eventually but we're definitely not there yet. I'd support a basic income but it would need to be scaled appropriately to GDP.

    75. Re:Technology allows by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Over half of what we produce goes straight to the landfill (in one fashion or another). The 'sacrifice' angle is bullshit. There is no need to submit to any authority that demands it. If they demand that we cut the waste and contamination, then that is different. But to ration is intolerable and inhuman.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    76. Re:Technology allows by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Humans are status seeking animals, we have never managed to build a society that doesn't include some kind of status differentiation. Frankly, without genetic engineering of a fairly scary kind I don't think that's ever going away.

    77. Re: Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already tried it in a place called Soviet Union. It didn't work. It never works. Accept human nature and work with it instead of against it.

    78. Re:Technology allows by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Land however will remain expensive until we invent some newer, faster mode of transport, or somehow eliminate people's need to travel on a regular basis.

    79. Re:Technology allows by Khyber · · Score: 2

      " Now aren't you glad you voted for Obama?"

      I can tell you're a fucking child.

      This shit's been going on since the 1920s.

      Go back to school and learn history, idiot child.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    80. Re:Technology allows by Khyber · · Score: 1

      'We may have the technology, but we don't have the resources"

      Spoken like a true wasteful ignorant fool.

      The resource use is tied right the fuck in with the technology.

      Come back when you realize the truth - not likely until you reach my level of education as a research director.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    81. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is fascinating is that H1B visa holders now need to be looking over their shoulder wondering whom will be replacing them in order to keep the labor costs low of companies that use them...the traditional "Indian" foothold in the U.S. is giving away to Asian countries since they will work for an EVEN LOWER WAGE than H1B holders...so much for that talk of "only the most skilled are hired" when all the Americans were purged in favor of the initial waves of H1B's. I'd think that H1B holders would not be trying to support INCREASING H1B visas issued in the U.S. since that would allow their lower wage competition to establish a foothold in the U.S. and send them packing. Will be interesting to see how that plays out.

      Something that is somewhat newer is the L1 visa program that goes after trade jobs in the U.S - and being heavily pushed by Obama. With this endeavor, traditional "non-offshore" jobs like plumbers, welders, electricians, office workers and so on can now join in on the fun of having their own jobs handed to an L1 holder (after they train them as was the case with IT, of course).

      With the massive shift of labor from U.S. citizens to lowest wage labor found anywhere on the planet, whether in hi-tech or engineering, to those employed in other job types, indeed the unfortunate U.S. citizens (that by design of the economy itself have the highest cost of living) will have a lot of time on their hands to enjoy the leisure society. The question is, as U.S. government revenue dries up from so many unemployed or underemployed - who's going to (1) pay for all the social costs to support U.S. citizens and, perhaps more important, (2) how will the U.S. government survive as its tax revenue shrivels up into nothingness?

    82. Re: Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup

    83. Re: Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CIA World Factbook lists the fertility rate for Kuwait as 2.53 children born per woman, so it seems pretty unlikely that the average family there has 8 kids.

    84. Re: Technology allows by gordo3000 · · Score: 1

      this isn't uncommon in the arab oil countries even 30 years ago, but now it is getting very rare. it's more complicated than "the government pays". You have to remember just 1-2 generations ago, they were all dirt poor. Having lots of children usually slowly shrinks to having 2-4 then finally 0-2. And of course, you were listening to someone who really doesn't know what they are talking about, and going by (most likely) a couple of people they know. The fertility rate in Kuwait is 2.6. This is significantly higher than other countries with their income, but in the last 50 years it is down from over 7. The national shock of the Iraq invasion stopped the collapse in the fertility rate, but had it continued, it could easily have tracked with the emirates to 1.8.

    85. Re:Technology allows by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Urban myth. There is no appreciable difference in population growth when there are power outages or even during winter.

      Says who? Unfortunately I couldn't find a chart of births by month in the US, so I had to make my own.

      Here's a plot of the results: http://postimg.org/image/3qa37...
      Data source: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_a...

      Unfortunately the data doesn't provide day of birth, only month of birth, so I normalized by dividing by the number of days in the month in 2013 which gives me births/days per month. Assuming 2013 wasn't an atypical year, there's a definite peak in births from July to September, which suggests more babies are being conceived in winter than in summer.

      Here are the raw numbers:

      J: 10461
      F: 10441
      M: 10360
      A: 10409
      M: 10651
      J: 10682
      J: 11287
      A: 11428
      S: 11295
      O: 11011
      N: 10641
      D: 10849

    86. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've yet to see proof that humans are capable of such long-term planning.

    87. Re:Technology allows by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Most do. Some groups still have large families.

      Once we are all well educated and not poor, population growth will come to be dominated by those groups.

      You should consider human culture as a bacterial culture and "wealth and education" as penicillin. It's a good holding action but it isn't the solution everyone thinks it is.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    88. Re:Technology allows by camperdave · · Score: 1

      No. Having families is what happens when there's nothing better to do. That's why the population booms whenever there is a power outage. You want to reduce the population growth? Give everyone a TV, and internet access.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    89. Re:Technology allows by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I believe the conversation goes more like:

      "Honey, should we have another kid?"
      "No."
      "But..."
      "No! No! No"
      [dejected] "Alright".
      "Oh! Come on Ref! That was blatant interference. How could you not call that?... Um... Did you say something Sweetie?"

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    90. Re:Technology allows by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Combine a large war with disruption of the JIT we have now for food and medicine. Bad combo.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    91. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just one more data point on the SAME line of the uneducated.

    92. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Once people get a little bit of education and the ability to enjoy leisure time, they funnily enough stop having kids.

      Unfortunately, this doesn't seem to be completely true. They may get a bit less kids, but around here (Europe), families with 3 to 4 kids are not uncommon. Also, I have the impression that the ecological footprint of the few western kids may be higher than that of the many "developing country" kids. This is speculation from my side, though.

    93. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, make that just "uneducated."

    94. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, she'll have to do with my 12" model.

    95. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think post-scarcity economy, where the artificial scarcities of today (labour, energy, resources) are replaced by technological solutions.

      Need more unskilled labour? Automate with robots. Let the humans concentrate on 'labor' that only humans can do, like art, music, scientific research, teaching, medicine, etc etc. People shouldn't be working to make a pay cheque, they should be in a career for the love of what they do. Think of all the wasted human potential trapped in the millions of people who can't do what they WANT to do, because they instead have to eat.

      Need more energy? That one is easy, research out both the Thorium fuel cycle and 4th generation fission reactors to not only use Thorium (which is plentiful) but also use all that 'nuclear waste' in the form of 'used' fuel as REAL usable fuel in that very same fuel cycle. At the same time, research out nuclear fusion, and cover Australia with Solar/Wind (although I don't really think solar/wind can compare to Thorium)

      Need more resources? How about using the ones we have more efficiently. Perfect recyclying (think start trek) would fix the waste that is called a landfill. We shouldn't be filling holes in the ground with waste, there so be little to no waste. With advanced technology and unlimited energy, this is totally doable.

      See http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm as an example of a possible society

    96. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, have you notice the affliction that strikes most of the wives of male H-1b workers? It takes about 9 months to cure, but they get a nice anchor out of it.

    97. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flipping sociopaths wouldn't like the world they dream of.

    98. Re:Technology allows by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

      I am fairly certain we could feed most of us on algae and bio burgers grown from a test tube and wheat gentically modified to grows faster, etc. Our population will tap out at 12 billion according to the recent data and we can feed the majority of those. It may not be mcdondald and burger king burgers, but they will live. the question is what do we do with them all? they are not going to have the kinds of jobs we have, there is no reason to have that many people.

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    99. Re:Technology allows by bbelt16ag · · Score: 1

      you are too right.

      --
      NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER GIVE UP! "No limitations, no boundaries, there is no reason for them."
    100. Re: Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, with all the work i do in government funded housing complexes where i see (along with the disabled and elderly) black and hispanic families living, already too poor to pay their own rent in probably because the children they already couldnt afford to take care of, tons of them pregnant still... i'm just seeing all of these hallucinations through race colored glasses?

      You didnt weigh in on the hispanic women and their birth rate either. I must be hallucinating that too.

    101. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both sexes. Sex is not the same as gender. Both sexes have a better understanding of it, or all genders. But you really mean both sexes.

    102. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Now aren't you glad you voted for Obama?"

      I can tell you're a fucking child.

      This shit's been going on since the 1920s.

      Go back to school and learn history, idiot child.

      Wow, the caliber of your comment is exemplary. Use of profanity and all. When you get laid off there will be a position waiting for you at Fox.

    103. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Without immigration, the USA population is actually shrinking

      Not true. Birth rate is still nearly double the death rate.

    104. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The things we really need and care about are still largely made by hand, and there is no reasonable technological replacement on the horizon. And, yes I'm aware of the 3D printed houses. They look like someday they may serve as a replacement the homes found in trailer parks.

      3D printing is in its infancy, but it's evolving rapidly. It is truly revolutionary in its ability to replace skilled labor, where older technologies replaced unskilled labor.

      Don't be surprised if within the next 20 years, anything that can be made by hand can be 3D printed (or made with a combination of CNC technologies).

      Think "matter compilers" but not at the atomic level.

    105. Re:Technology allows by euroq · · Score: 1

      Actually a lot of it is because more kids in underdeveloped economies equates to more wealth, and in developed economies, more kids generally does not lead to more wealth.

      --
      Just because the U.S. is a republic does not mean it is not a democracy. Democracy/republic are not mutually exclusive.
    106. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they've officially fucked up another perfectly good word.

    107. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "'Gender' is a grammatical term; it is not a substitute for 'sex.' But then, what is?"
        - Edwin Newman

    108. Re:Technology allows by Kester1964 · · Score: 1

      Large families have declined along with the reduction in infant mortality, also people stop having kids in "educated" countries because they are no longer seen as a pension/health plan required to look after them in their old age.

    109. Re:Technology allows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what about the unborn child's rights? And before you reply, think about the brain functionality of an unborn child compared to that of a Terry Schiavo.

    110. Re:Technology allows by Methadras · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but we have a lot of resources left to use and reuse. Mind telling me which resources we are running out of after nearly 3 million years of hominid usage? We have 7 billion people and yet, we seem to be producing a lot for them using these resources. Even if population and resources meet equilibrium, then what? I think the whole 'we are running out of resources' screed is alarmist nonsense. True, we don't have infinite resources, but our technology is getting better and better to the point we use less, recycle more, and can reuse. I just want to understand your thinking on how we are running out resources.

    111. Re:Technology allows by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      Shit, and I wanted to mod you up so badly before the moronic Obama crack.

      Oh well.

    112. Re: Technology allows by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      You mean all those fertility idols we've been digging up were really some bronze-age man's whack stack?

      They didn't have much in the way of recreation back then.

    113. Re:Technology allows by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Now that is exactly why unions where created and why corporates hired thugs to murder union leaders and bought off politicians sent the national guard to physically abuse and even kill strikers. So it was before, so it will be again and those idiot screaming toddlers who want more, more, more, will instead find prison more accommodating to their corrupt life style. With four decades of continuous propaganda attacks by main stream media, unions were weakened but with the internet they are resurrecting as strong as ever. No IT unions, IT workers will be screwed over, IT Unions and abuse corporations and abusive corporate executives will be the ones facing real criminal penalties. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/... (Vive La Guillotine!).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    114. Re:Technology allows by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Self driving cars will make commutes much more tolerable, and make them faster by reducing traffic jams. Though ultimately the best thing would be to allow more telecommuting for those that have jobs that could allow it.

    115. Re:Technology allows by Pulzar · · Score: 1

      The question is, as U.S. government revenue dries up from so many unemployed or underemployed - who's going to (1) pay for all the social costs to support U.S. citizens and, perhaps more important, (2) how will the U.S. government survive as its tax revenue shrivels up into nothingness?

      The H1-Bs and L1s (and their spouses, L2s) all pay taxes. Why would tax revenue shrivel into nothingness?

      And, how does L1 visa go after trade jobs? L1 has been around for a long time, why is it bad now?

      --
      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a 747 filled with CD-ROMs.
    116. Re: Technology allows by MenThal · · Score: 1

      1 woman != 1 family... So, if the total statistical rate is with all women, then the family rate must be higher, since not all women are married or has kids?

      BTW, do they have polygamy there? That ought to really funk up the stats.

    117. Re:Technology allows by BalthCat · · Score: 1

      You're arguing something completely different. We don't have the resources to continue population growth, but that has nothing to do with how long we work during the week. People still fuck on the weekend. The solution to population growth isn't poverty, its education.

  2. Translation: by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "We were running low on our 'being an asshole' quota this month. Now be sure to continue to watch as your wives and kids demand and purchase our products, chumps."

    Mind you, that was just frustration talking... because seriously, what is anyone going to do about this?

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    1. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do we do?

      Very Simple.

      Unionize and grow a pair.

      1: If you are offered severance, don't sign it. If as few as 50 people do not do this, then the employer must file a WARN act to notify employee's of what is going on 60 days prior to the mass layoffs. That severance package waives certain rights and privileges you are entitled to, such as notification under WARN. They are basically paying you off so they don't have to file and wait, and they'll try to corral everyone together and get them out the door quick to keep you from having time to respond. Also politely inform them "My statement of work does not require me to train replacements"; they can't fire you for refusing to do what isn't on your statement of work.

      2: When the WARN act is filed and it becomes apparent what's going on, or when people start talking to each other, one fed-up person to goes to office depot, buys a $20 pack of business cards, prints up a few hundred business cards, and passes them out to co-workers and permatemp's. All the card has to say is "We're unionizing against this ridiculous outsourcing, e-mail xyz@email.net with e-mail and phone#"; this is mail merge in word, real simple. Get the Permatemp's and other similarly affected workers together for an afterhours meeting at a hotel conference center. Again, your laser printer is useful here.

      3: Get a law firm involved, and file a class-action lawsuit. Also, get the sheriffs office involved to perform a formal investigation with a signed petition and affidavits to back it up. Make it very clear to them the remedy you are looking for are not fines, but warrants and criminal charges against exec staff. And remember, you're IT staff, you can be served the warrant and go grab the data before any of the execs even catch onto what's going on.

      Jailtime is a really solid way to put an end to this; if the contractors they bring in to do these things are in jail, they can't go around doing it elsewhere. Also, if done right, the exec staff end up having their little power-trip and rosebud I'm-gonna-get-rich world interrupted one day when the police show up, put them in cuffs, and walk them out of the office. When they get convicted, the felony conviction will keep them from ever holding a upper management position at a company ever again; it's security guard or janitor duty.

      In America we put dangerous people behind bars so they can't do bad things to us; Jailtime will put an end to this sort of thing and the beautiful thing is it only has to happen a few times for upper management to "Get it"..

    2. Re:Translation: by Livius · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It really isn't about money.

      It's about control. H1B workers can be abused in ways other workers can't, regardless of pay.

    3. Re:Translation: by ohnocitizen · · Score: 2

      Why should we compete with people from countries with a drastically lower standard of living? We rant and rage when companies use their wealth and power to get away with shit - which can include gouging customers. Wanting to be paid market rate in your country for a job you do isn't some sin.

      In terms of what can we do - support politicians like Bernie Sanders when they support fighting back against H1B. If you are fortunate enough to choose between working for a company that supports H1B and one that doesn't - go to the one that doesn't. Form a startup if you are in a position to do so. Do anything you can to bring pressure to companies that abuse H1B.

      In the end though companies have so much power that to really make a dent, we must pass laws to protect workers in the US.

    4. Re:Translation: by evorster · · Score: 1

      Quite a few massive corporations have only the mightly dollar as master, and that does not make them very good corporations.

      More than just unionize on one single act, of a business, corporations should be put on a index to how well they are serving the community. Then informed people can vote with their wallets, and only support corporations that actively improve the lives of everyone, not just the select few.

      Now, what is the best way to index corporations on how well they are serving the community?

    5. Re:Translation: by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Now that needs to be modded up to 11, especially considering how close it is to the indentured worker situation of a bit over a hundred years ago.
      There's a certain type of manager that never got the memo that slavery is bad. I've met one that needed his own personal lawyer to stop him from doing things with employee rights that could have landed him in prison (eg. employee tracking out of office hours, wanting to put cameras in places where people are naked etc).

    6. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that to hire someone on a work visa, it had to be proven that Americans had a chance at the job and none qualified could be found. Replacing people they already had with people on work visas really smells of something foul. I would expect lawyers to be all over this.

    7. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bernie Sanders the man that brought on the housing crisis with his misguided anti redlining legislation ? Pro Tip here, if you can't afford a loan you can't afford a loan.

    8. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought that to hire someone on a work visa, it had to be proven that Americans had a chance at the job and none qualified could be found. Replacing people they already had with people on work visas really smells of something foul. I would expect lawyers to be all over this.

      ROFLMAO There are seminars put on by law firms telling employers how to game the system. Have you ever noticed the 100 skills and technologies listed in job advertisements yet amazingly no domestic IT worker can meet those requirements? Yet like magic pixies there is always an Indian available with exactly those skills with exactly the number of years of experience. The politicians are corrupt and should be arrested and executed. A trial is a waste of time due to the mountains of evidence of the politicians' corrupt acts against the country.

    9. Re:Translation: by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mind you, that was just frustration talking... because seriously, what is anyone going to do about this?

      Stop believing in imaginary entities such as Disney, thus leaving all their "property" free for taking. For that matter, stop believing in imaginary chains of ownership altogether; if someone's not personally using some resource, it doesn't belong to him, no matter any paper says.

      Capitalism is just a secularized religion. It's gods, and the divinely ordained order they live in, are no more immune to final sanction than any others that have guided civilizations in ages past. Invisible Hand either gets its shit together or smashes into the Ragnarock of reality, just like Historical Inevitability did in the USSR. Past accomplishments don't excuse continued lousy performance forever, for men or their gods.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    10. Re:Translation: by houghi · · Score: 1

      Nobody is doing anything about this, because Unions are evil and everybody thinks they are 1 on 1 with companies on an equal level.

      SO what happens is that everybody will be hoping that the moment it will be their turn, it will be as late as possible and at the same time trow their cow orkers under the train.

      Mind you; from what I understand of Unions in the USofA, they are more guilds then unions. In Belgium I have the choice between several unions and nobody cares if I join one or not.

      Also in Belgium when X people get fired (depends on both number and percentage) they will need to anounce it, that will take up 6 months and then they will need to have very good excuses to dump those people.

      Yes, it is very socialist to think of the people first before the companies and YMMV, but the countries where they do this the most tend to do much better than those who don't and where 'grab what you can' is more common.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    11. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retards like you are still blaming the people who took out bad loans, instead of the scumbags who leveraged the debt multiple times and sold them as good debt?

      Fuck's sake, you're a brainwashed little twerp.

    12. Re:Translation: by hidflect · · Score: 1

      Bingo! It's the innate sense of servitude stemming from the gratitude for the "opportunity" they've been given to escape their rat-race/hell-hole of an existence... and the ever present threat of being sent back there if they ever dare to lift their heads over the cubicle wall.

    13. Re:Translation: by paiute · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bernie Sanders the man that brought on the housing crisis with his misguided anti redlining legislation ? Pro Tip here, if you can't afford a loan you can't afford a loan.

      Yes, the elderly Senator from a small state with no party to back him up literally took control of our entire economy and wrecked it single-handed while Wall Street executives and billionaires stood helplessly by wringing their hands.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    14. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For that matter, stop believing in imaginary chains of ownership altogether; if someone's not personally using some resource, it doesn't belong to him, no matter any paper says.

      Exactly. If you're not sitting in "your" car, it should be free for me to use. Please leave the keys, it'll make things a lot less messy. Likewise the bed you usually sleep in, and that sandwich you left in the refrigerator.

    15. Re:Translation: by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      "Sir? Sir, no, no, you're not allowed to whip the office staff, sir."

      "Oh, right, right. Ugh, who can keep all these obscure rules straight?!"

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    16. Re:Translation: by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      You could compete against the H1B holders by matching their salary requirements.

      Why do you think it is ok to force people to pay higher prices for your talents, when the same talent is available at a lower price?

      Don't you rant and rage when companies do this to you with their products?

      Oh, have we given up the pretense that H1B workers are paid the same as domestic workers? Because that's the law, you know. But thanks for your refreshing candor in admitting that hiring H1B's is wage arbitrage.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    17. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Thus, my avoidance of Disney products as much as possible. I stopped buying Marvel comics because of Disney.

      captcha: malisms

    18. Re:Translation: by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      The banks created the housing crisis when they switched from holding loans to selling them as mortgage backed securities. Despite warnings from heroes like Brooksley E. Born at the CFTC powerful interests quashed any attempt to head off the disaster. Try reading "The handbook of fixed income securities", if you manage to make it through that extremely dry tome you'll wonder how anyone who knew what they were doing could have not seen it coming.

    19. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop believing in imaginary entities such as Disney, thus leaving all their "property" free for taking. For that matter, stop believing in imaginary chains of ownership altogether; if someone's not personally using some resource, it doesn't belong to him, no matter any paper says.

      So if I go on vacation and someone moves into my house while I was gone, it's just "too bad, you weren't using it, just wait for them to leave and you can take it back?"

    20. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever tried a "food" product with a DIzzy Lable on it? My cats would'nt eat the cat food that dizzy put there name on. Every time I try something (I have a kid) it's trash. So now the only things my kid gets from DIzzy is toys or movies. Yeah I know; I'm weak. But my kid is happy. And she can talk to her friends about the latest "Dizzy" thing so she's not left out of the "Click." That brings up her self esteam and image. We need something like "Dizzy" but they need to be better if they expect me to keep beaing lazy and not find other things for my kid to bond with her piers.

    21. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bernie Sanders the man that brought on the housing crisis with his misguided anti redlining legislation ? Pro Tip here, if you can't afford a loan you can't afford a loan.

      Yes, the elderly Senator from a small state with no party to back him up literally took control of our entire economy and wrecked it single-handed while Wall Street executives and billionaires stood helplessly by wringing their hands.

      Sounds like the kind of take charge guy who ought to be running for president.

    22. Re:Translation: by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Bernie Sanders the man that brought on the housing crisis with his misguided anti redlining legislation ? Pro Tip here, if you can't afford a loan you can't afford a loan.

      Tell that to Countrywide. You don't seem to understand that the housing crisis was brought on by fraud on the part of the mortgage originators, loan packagers and ratings agencies.

      Seriously, there is enough written on the topic by people like Barry Ritholtz and Matt Taibbi. I don't understand why people keep pushing the legislation angle, except for servicing an agenda or willful ignorance.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    23. Re:Translation: by ultranova · · Score: 1

      So if I go on vacation and someone moves into my house while I was gone, it's just "too bad, you weren't using it, just wait for them to leave and you can take it back?"

      What ever made you think it's different? Not nature; leave a nest unguarded and some other critter claims it. "Property" is a social construct. If it becomes a tool for tyranny - if a few hoard everything and claim "property" as an excuse to enslave the rest - then it's on its way to the wastebasket of history.

      Not that property is likely to last anyway. If 3D printers and other microproduction fulfils its promise, they'll finish what the industrial revolution started. Then what would be the point of hoarding, when you can instantiate any physical object you need, and let it be dissolved/recycled again when you no longer do?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    24. Re:Translation: by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It was pretty fucking close to that. I suspect copious consumption of cocaine had something to do with it but maybe he really was like that.

    25. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, it's not that hard to grasp.

      Banker: "You can afford a house!"
      Renter: "No, I can't."
      Banker: "Yes, you can! See, take a variable-rate loan!"
      Renter: "Oh, I can afford that!"
      [5 years later]
      Renter: "Hey, my mortgage payment just doubled. I can't afford it."
      Banker: "Shouldn't have taken that loan, dummy. FORECLOSED!"

    26. Re:Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop believing in imaginary entities such as Disney, thus leaving all their "property" free for taking. For that matter, stop believing in imaginary chains of ownership altogether; if someone's not personally using some resource, it doesn't belong to him, no matter any paper says.

      Interesting fantasy world you live in. Your understanding of these matters is quite limited, and you are not helping the problem in any way.

      Your homework assignment is to read at least five books on economic history. Pay attention to the point every one will make regarding moderately strong property rights as being fundamental to economic growth, and thus improvement to the quality of life for vast numbers of people.

      Don't confuse the need to have moderately strong property rights with having overly strong property rights (this is cause of most of the abuse associated with patent and copyright). The latter comes about when a society is dysfunctional. Typically this happens when rich sociopaths and unethical legal professionals act in collusion. The unethical legal professionals recognize that overly strong property rights create future business for them, and write property law and precedent to create such rights (and a whole host of other laws, precedents, and customs designed to protect the system). The rich sociopaths take advantage of the system (often by utilizing ethics problems in government), advancing themselves without attempting to bring others along with them (others aren't real to the sociopaths, by definition). The net effect of this one-two punch is to cause society all kinds of problems, something the USA is experiencing in full effect in this day and age, with all kinds of negative consequences both for the USA and the rest of the world.

      Don't feel to bad about missing this distinction, since most economists haven't figured it out either. The negative economic effects of ethics problems in law is something the economics profession is only dimly aware of. Fix the ethics problems in law, and the sociopaths become a lot more manageable, of course, since much of what they are doing violates fundamental rights (many of which arise as rights "retained by the people" under the 9th Amendment). The trick is how to go about fixing the ethics problems.

      Incidentally, there's little or no conspiracy here, since amoral and unethical individuals are perfectly capable of recognizing shared opportunity without having it spelled out.

      Also, note that the ethics problems in law shield ethics problems in government. Think about it.

      Capitalism is just a secularized religion. It's gods, and the divinely ordained order they live in, are no more immune to final sanction than any others that have guided civilizations in ages past. Invisible Hand either gets its shit together or smashes into the Ragnarock of reality, just like Historical Inevitability did in the USSR.

      Capitalism is not a religion, though it may sometimes seem like one to those that don't understand it. A lot of folks fall into that category thanks to more than a century of highly misleading and erroneous socialist propaganda, you are not alone. Your homework here is to read Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations, and at least one more modern economics books that discusses capitalism. Be prepared to discuss the large portion of the book in which Smith describes how regulation is necessary for the invisible hand to work, while inappropriate regulation actually causes problems. With your new understanding of economic history, discuss how the need for regulation has failed or succeeded in the past, and compare with today. Note particularly that regulation depends (at least to some extent) upon the law, which gets back to the previous point regarding ethics problems in law.

  3. Darn I'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What's all this blabber about STEM in American education and code.org and we need more tech workers? What I'm so confused. Companies like Google and Facebook would never be so evil as Disney, right?

    1. Re:Darn I'm confused by zarthrag · · Score: 1

      More tech workers means a larger, less costly labor pool. Part of the strategy. Also, it could spin-off a few innovative startups for those same mega-corps to gobble-up ...along with the best of that skill/talent pool to manage the legions of cheap workers - just a fringe benefit of the strategy.

      --
      Why can't all fpga/microcontroller manufacturers just release free optimizing compilers???
  4. Enough! by JimSadler · · Score: 1

    So good old uncle Walt would not hire himself these days. Greed can exist far beyond the graveyard.

    1. Re:Enough! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They weren't replaced with H1-B Disney employees. IT was outsourced to another company. The other company is the one using offshore & H1-Bs, NOT DISNEY.
      There is no reason to hire local US staff for 2nd & 3rd shift IT. Those can easily be filled by outsourced employees working at local normal hours.

    2. Re:Enough! by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      Well having a relative who's father worked for good old uncle Walt as an animator, I think Walt would have approved of this move.

      --
      Time to offend someone
  5. Disney lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To summarize: Disney feels comfortable lying. Response: Don't buy anything from them.

    1. Re:Disney lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't buy anything from them.

      Not even Tron? I'm so conflicted.

    2. Re:Disney lies. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Burn your Minnie Mouse underwear too. We know you wear them.

  6. Lets Replace Mickey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perhaps Mickey should be replaced with an H1-B worker

    1. Re: Lets Replace Mickey by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Why not?! At the end of the day, they're all muppets anyways; and America needs more muppets. No strings attached!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Lets Replace Mickey by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Mikimu Mousajan

    3. Re:Lets Replace Mickey by garyisabusyguy · · Score: 1

      Japanese version would cost you twice as much these days, keep moving west

      --
      Wherever You Go, There You Are
    4. Re:Lets Replace Mickey by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Mickey should be replaced with an H1-B worker

      If he had entered the public domain, like he should have years ago, we wouldn't have to.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  7. Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by SuperKendall · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Some of these folks were literally flown in the day before to take over the exact same job I was doing,

    A) What were you doing you could be replaced that easily?!

    B) Companies can drop you any time, out of nowhere. Keep some savings, and keep skills up so that if you need another job, you can find one... it's really easy at larger companies to drift into something that lasts years, if not endlessly. Don't let such things trap you.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skills to keep sharp:

      1) East Indian accent.
      2) Learn to say "yes Sir, yes Sir, I suck your cock, Sir"

    2. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) Nothing. Keeping things going RIGHT is really, really hard.

      B) Then eliminate social security, retirement and personal taxes because EVERYONE will end up working till they die. If companies had to power to do so, they would perpetually hire/fire people for minimum wage in the name of profit.

    3. Re: Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and then also buying legislation lowering minimum wage

    4. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like someone who is too fat, dumb and comfortable to realize that he is next.

    5. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This. Nobody wants to hear it but this is how capitalism works, and every other economic system we've seen is even worse in the long run (for example, Communism).

      "Everyone is a private contractor" sounds like the title of one of those cheap business paperbacks, and it probably is, but it has a lot of the truth. When I hear about a company where the CEO talks about treating everyone like family - that's a company that's destined to go through an extended period of recriminations, with fired employees talking about betrayal.

    6. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A) What were you doing you could be replaced that easily?!

      Graveyards are full of indispensable men.

    7. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The issue really isn't the fact that the H1Bs are taking over 'native' STEM positions, it is that Disney et. al. is flat out lying about it.

      Remember, the H1B program is an immigration loophole set up by the government for certain purposes (allowing non citizens to work in the US when there are no qualified citizens). It was not designed to be a welfare program for big companies. Even for 'easily replaced' employees.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Any IT professional who does his job correctly can be easily replaced because part of being a professional is documenting everything so that anyone can understand it.

      But that really doesn't matter because anyone can be replaced by a lower cost worker. The effects of that action, except for the immediate salary drop, aren't felt until later so they're not correlated to the employee change by the people who made that decision. Only improvements are seen. Losses are somebody else's fault and a large salary change can mask those losses.

    9. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      sure, blame the employees for this.

      to even suggest that the employees had ANY part in this other than having western style expenses like american healthcare, rent, food, gas - you know, luxuries - is dishonest or outright fraudulent.

      shill much for The Man?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    10. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      A) What were you doing you could be replaced that easily?!

      Everyone is expendable, from the CEO to the janitor. That's not evil that's just running a good business. Anyone who tries to make himself indispensable is the first person you try to replace, it's not a good behavior and it's not good for anyone.

      B) Companies can drop you any time, out of nowhere. Keep some savings, and keep skills up so that if you need another job, you can find one... it's really easy at larger companies to drift into something that lasts years, if not endlessly. Don't let such things trap you.

      Yes, that's always good advice. However in this case it should not have happened but for screwed up laws and indentured servitude. If these people were replaced with other citizens or residents who were believably competing on wages, then generally I agree.

    11. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      If the allegations are true, Disney (or their outsourcing firm) broke the law. It doesn't really matter how screwed up the law is if it's being ignored anyway.

    12. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      What were you doing you could be replaced that easily?

      What the hell are you doing that you can't? News flash for you: we replace our President every 4 to 8 years and the sun still rises the next day. If you can't be replaced tomorrow, then someone done fucked up.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    13. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Old timey IT solutions

      A) Document NOTHING, if anybody attempts to track what you do, make 95% of it confusing misdirection and then when you are being useful disguise it as using the restroom so that they are too embarrassed to watch

      B) Three Words, Dead Man's Switch, the day you do not show up for work, everything goes to hell. Just for fun set up the only access to it via some ancient wifi located in the ceiling of the men's room with its antenna removed

      And people wonder why the ones who survive are so cantankerous

    14. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

      A) What were you doing you could be replaced that easily?!

      In my experience, upper management's views on who is easily replaceable don't usually conform very well to reality.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    15. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's not that the employee is that "easily replaced" as in brain-dead simple job skills..... it's more like the replacements were recruited, hired, and 'imported' for jobs currently staffed by american workers.

      i hope disney at least did not make the displaced workers train their cheaper h1-b replacements.

    16. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      B) Three Words, Dead Man's Switch, the day you do not show up for work, everything goes to hell. Just for fun set up the only access to it via some ancient wifi located in the ceiling of the men's room with its antenna removed

      C) The day after you do not show up for work, police show up at your house and drag your ass to jail for sabotage.
      D) Felony conviction.
      E) No job for you ever again.
      F) Suicide is your only option.

      God bless America!

    17. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Livius · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was not designed to be a welfare program for big companies.

      You haven't been paying attention.

    18. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone mod this shit UP.

    19. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Boronx · · Score: 1

      H1B visas aren't an essential feature of capitalism.

    20. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The key is to document just enough to not get fired and have a backdoor so you can torch everything on the way out.

    21. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Better yet is a deadman switch with a several month time delay. That way, disaster doesn't strike until you've been gone long enough that people won't connect you to it, even though you were responsible for the programs that are now giving them trouble.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    22. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What were you doing you could be replaced that easily?!.

      Clearly you have never worked with the imported labor. They have trouble just operating a printer.

      Only clueless MBAs think they can actually do the work.

    23. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey wait a minute, if this is capitalism, where by Corporations can source labour from anywhere is the world

      Why does this same capitalism prevent me from sourcing my Music, Movies, TV programs, Books, etc etc etc etc from anywhere is the world too ?

    24. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      H1B visas are nothing more than subsidies for the tech industry. If the CEO just wants to hire foreign workers, he can re-locate or open new locations in foreign countries to do so.

    25. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Sarius64 · · Score: 2

      That's operating a printer with 16 years J2EE development experience.

    26. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by dbIII · · Score: 1

      What were you doing (that) you could be replaced that easily

      Anyone can be replaced easily. Whether the replacement is able to pick up the job and continue is not always considered carefully enough - consequences may be bad but the act of throwing someone out the door isn't so hard. History is full of the best in a field getting shown the door because someone's nephew needs a job.
      Also, while it can be hard to replace someone in a niche role it's not impossible. When I was a contractor I replaced a few "indispensable" people myself for a while. It took a bit of time to quantify what they were actually doing but I could eventually pick up the threads and do the job the "indispensable" person failed to do and document it well enough for someone with the a similar background to the "indispensable" person to take over for the long term. Sometimes they really were doing shitloads of complicated stuff for good reason, sometimes it was a needlessly complicated shambles held together by brown paper and string and only the "indispensable" person knew the standard operating procedures to keep it going.
      Unless your job is to do things that have not been done before it's not so hard to replace you with a list of stuff you do handed to a person with a similar background to yourself.

      I could replace you overnight. The replacement may never be able to do the job as well as you do, but often that's a problem for someone other than the person that has decided to replace you. Sucks on many levels but you are no more immune than the guy you've asked "What were you doing (that) you could be replaced that easily."

    27. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      While it is possible that someone might manage such a thing, I'd still find it insane. Two wrongs do not make a right. Just because a company screwed you over, does not give you the right to throw a tantrum and break as much stuff as possible. Such actions tend to lead to long jail sentences and impossible to pay damages. They would also make you non employable in pretty much any future job. Your best bet is to let go of your anger, and if you have time left continue to do your job. Now I wouldn't necessarily bend over backwards to make sure everything went well without you, but you still need to continue to do your job or if you can't bring yourself to do that then you need to politely ask for time off or simply explain why you feel you can no longer work there. Seriously though, I'd continue working until the end while looking for a new job. Sure it cuts into your time looking, but it is not as if you will lack time after your current job is done... Also, just because a company hires H1B's, doesn't mean they won't have to call back some of the workers they let go. Now, it would of course be poetic justice if those workers already had a different job and the H1B replacements make a complete mess of things, but, there is no point in closing a door needlessly.

    28. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Required+Snark · · Score: 5, Informative

      Everyone is expendable, from the CEO to the janitor.

      I suggest that you leave your parent's basement and visit the real world some time. in the real world everyone is expendable except for the CEO and their cronies.

      Look at all the big US companies after the 2008 crash. No CEOs, C-anything-O or boards of director were out and out fired. A very few CEOs (for example the head of Bank of America) were "retired", but given their fat golden parachutes they still ended up outrageously wealthy. There is no negative penalty, even for complete failure, for anyone at the top.

      Corporations only have one goal: making the upper management as rich as possible. They will throw anyone under the bus to achieve that end: employees, stockholders, customers. If it's ever a choice between stockholders and management, stockholders get screwed.

      For example: Deep Misalignment Between Corporate Economic Performance, Shareholder Return and Executive Compensation

      For the vast majority of S&P 1500 companies, there is a major disconnect between corporate operating performance, shareholder value and incentive plans for executives. New research details an over-reliance on accounting metrics that do not measure capital efficiency, and how total shareholder return obscures a line of sight to the underlying drivers of economic performance. Economic performance explains only 12% of variance in chief executive officer (CEO) compensation.

      What universe are you from? How can you make a statement that is so clearly false? Did someone pay to say that, or are you a free lance idiot?

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    29. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what? no. the h1b program says that you can't pay a worker less than the prevailing wage. if disney pays higher than average wages, and it replaces experienced people with less experienced immigrants, it is totally possible to save a lot of money and be within the rules to do what it did.

      the green card rules require that no US citizen be available for the job. but the qualifications can be very tightly written as long as it doesn't depend on experience the worker got at the same company.

    30. Re: Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by eclectro · · Score: 2

      So capitalism involves cheating and gaming the H1b system to the point of criminality so corporate profits can be maximized at the expense of everything and everyone else? Sign me up for a different system.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    31. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      While it is possible that someone might manage such a thing, I'd still find it insane.

      You didn't really think I was serious, did you? I was just pointing out that if you're going to be foolish enough to build in a deadman switch, having it go off right after you leave is going to tell everybody exactly who's responsible. I won't say that I can't imagine anybody who reads /. would be stupid enough to do something like that, but I'd hope that if they were, they'd at least have enough sense to include a reasonable time delay.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    32. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by CxDoo · · Score: 1

      Any sufficiently complex system contains a bunch of dead man switches by nature. No need to be malicious, just walk away.

      If that's not the case, you might need to acknowledge your job wasn't all that complicated.

      --
      "Blah blah blah." - [citation needed]
    33. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      This. It's not about whether you're replaceable. It's about whether some PHB who did Strategic Management at A&M Galveston thinks you are.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    34. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      My "must check in every 72 hour" deadman switch software cache that's spread through the network holding back a whole slew of self-rewriting virus and malware is what keeps me employed.

    35. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      In 15 years and 4 companies I have had 9 different CEOs, that's what makes me say that. None of them believably retired or voluntarily stepped down, and only one or two was an obvious crook. By comparison in 15 years and 4 companies I've had 6 supervisors, only one of whom left the company but in her case she really did retire.

      I am not defending what upper management does, they do what I'd do, only they have more power to do it. I personally consider Wall St. the big enemy, not upper management.

    36. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      Hey wait a minute, if this is capitalism, where by Corporations can source labour from anywhere is the world

      Why does this same capitalism prevent me from sourcing my Music, Movies, TV programs, Books, etc etc etc etc from anywhere is the world too ?

      Well, after all, if "Nobody owes you a job", why should you "owe them your business"?

    37. Re: Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two wrongs absolutely do make a right you fucking doormat.

    38. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      in the real world everyone is expendable except for the CEO

      And that's why when Steve Jobs died, he was entombed along with all of his employees to care for him in his next life.

      Or maybe he, too, was replaced.

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    39. Re: Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Sign me up for a different system.

      Figure out something else that actually works and isn't based on wishful fantasy and I'm there. Till then we're stuck with capitalism.

    40. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Nobody owes them a tax break, or subsidies either.

      Nobody owes them totally "free" trade either.

    41. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

      And most people still vote in favour of politicians who clearly are working for these CEOs and their cronies, not the average citizen. Before you can reasonably expect things to change, the public first needs to wake the f up and stop (re)electing these clowns. We're still a very long way from that, as most people still hold firm to the notion that "their party" deserves their vote.

    42. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by Loopy · · Score: 1

      It was not designed to be a welfare program for big companies.

      You haven't been paying attention.

      Don't be disingenuous. "Designed" in this context meaning "originally intended." You aren't perhaps an H1B candidate, are you? ;)

    43. Re:Lesson for workers : Keep skills sharp by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      Corporations only have one goal: making the upper management as rich as possible.

      Please, please, please go out and start your own business and get back me after a few years, will you?

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
  8. Re:What's the problem by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

    What is wrong if they can find someone who can do it for cheaper?

    Doesn't a CEO have a right to run his business the way he sees fit. If you can't compete with these low end folks with language barriers that says more about you than it does about cost cutting.

    The first part of your comment is worth expanding on a little:

    You are correct, but define "cheaper". Is the extra time required to complete a project due to language barrier cheaper? Is the $150/hr per head you're paying to hire H1-B contractors making $20/hr "cheaper"? Is the extra liability insurance... well, you get the idea.

    It only seems cheaper at first... until the invoices roll in, deadlines slip, and things start getting ugly once the contract agency does... because what are you going to do about it if the contracting firm decides to pull all their guys out at the end of the week? ;)

    But anyway... as you were.

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  9. Re:What's the problem by meerling · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just wanted to say Thank You, and no hard feelings. It seems we've found a couple of interns that will do your entire departments for a pepperoni pizza and 2 liter of coke per shift. You have 6 hours to train your replacements and will be expected to have vacated the premises or security will detain you until the police arrive and you will be prosecuted for trespassing.
    Don't forget your NDA, you can't say anything about what this company does.
    Thank you very much, and hit the road bud.

  10. Used to work at an immigration firm by speedlaw · · Score: 5, Informative

    IAAL. Learned in a stint at an immigration law firm, that H1B means you write a job description that only your candidate can fill. For example, if I wanted an airplane engineer who knew jumbo jets, I could get a thousand Americans for the job. If I needed a jumbo jet guy who also could work on Bleriot biplanes, that might be a lot less. If I also said he needed to be fluent in Mandarin and Farsi, I've just written an H1-B for my candidate. The key to success is making sure that only your guy can meet the job description that YOU create. Had a friend who was H1-B, even though he was raised in the states...he never bothered for the green card, took the easy way through school, etc. Had a falling out with his boss, and the H1-B went "poof". This essentially American had to relocate to Europe, and when he didn't self deport, was excluded for five years. H1-B means your employer owns your ass. Sadly, it is now a means to "on shore" a docile labor force.

    1. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      And, to advertise the job opening in a newspaper in a distant city that has few readers.

    2. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I also said he needed to be fluent in Mandarin and Farsi, I've just written an H1-B for my candidate.

      In my entire life I've never met anyone who filled that requirement.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    3. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And we thought they got rid of slavery and indentured servitude 150 years ago.

    4. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My Immigration Law professor taught me that's how you write an H1-B job description. That's why I can't buy the "we can't find any American workers" defense, because the law skirting is so common it's now standard curriculum for lawyers.

    5. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had the government dictate the text for my position back in 2007, something the government forced down precisely to prevent such custom writing of job descriptions for the specific candidate. Well, that went as expected. I am now (happily) in another part of the world, far far away from the now out-of-controll america. Back then it was the bottom falling out of my world and we lost tens upon tens of thousands of dollars having to up & out quickly as the H1-B ran out. But today I would not touch the US with a 9 million mile bargepole, and am grateful we moved.

    6. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 5, Informative

      The classic video of how employers can commit H1B fraud is at:

                          https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      What they describe is how to skirt the law, but still hire the less expensive H1B that an employer wants. to quote:

      "Our goal, clearly, is not to find a qualified and interested US worker."

    7. Re: Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not increase taxes for offshore labor based firms?

    8. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      so, you admit openly to brazenly breaking the law?

      please turn yourself in and the rest of your firm.

      (I do hate you, you are scum for selling out your own people. and like the cops that turn a blind eye on the thin blue line, you are just as guilty of helping to ruin the middle classs as those cops are of protecting their own even when laws are being broken by them).

      its scumbags like you that nod, smile and keep letting the system crush our country.

      and yes, I'm one of those who has been out of work WAY too long because I'm a white guy in the bay area and that means I'm 'too expensive'. people like you have helped keep me OUT of work.

      I hold you responsible for a part of it. how do you sleep at night? dammit!!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    9. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The best way to deal with this nonsense would be to sell the H1-B visas at auction, like taxi cab medallions, with the number adjusted each year so that the average price of each auctioned H1-B visa exceeds 400% of the federal poverty line for a family of 4 with that reserve price set as the starting bid for each H1-B visa. It's hard to say how much an H1-B is worth to a company that says that it needs them, so lets find out in a public auction. Force companies put their money where their mouths are.

    10. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by fightinfilipino · · Score: 3, Informative

      IAAL. Learned in a stint at an immigration law firm, that H1B means you write a job description that only your candidate can fill. For example, if I wanted an airplane engineer who knew jumbo jets, I could get a thousand Americans for the job. If I needed a jumbo jet guy who also could work on Bleriot biplanes, that might be a lot less. If I also said he needed to be fluent in Mandarin and Farsi, I've just written an H1-B for my candidate. The key to success is making sure that only your guy can meet the job description that YOU create. Had a friend who was H1-B, even though he was raised in the states...he never bothered for the green card, took the easy way through school, etc. Had a falling out with his boss, and the H1-B went "poof". This essentially American had to relocate to Europe, and when he didn't self deport, was excluded for five years. H1-B means your employer owns your ass. Sadly, it is now a means to "on shore" a docile labor force.

      this is laughably inaccurate, to the point where i question if you're actually a lawyer.

      to satisfy the requirements for an H-1B, you have to show that the position you're filling 1) requires at minimum a bachelor's degree in a particular specialty, and 2) your candidate has at least that bachelor's degree, or the equivalent. the process is based on the actual, real position the company is filling, NOT the other way around as you've just described. the burden is on the employer to prove that the bona fide position is an H-1B specialty occupation. read INA 214(i)(3) and 22 CFR 655.700 to 655.855, if you haven't already (hint: if you were even touching H-1Bs as a lawyer, this is MANDATORY READING, especially the LCA provisions!).

      what you've described is...not the H-1B process. it's what more unscrupulous companies try to do with the PERM Labor Certification process for a green card, where they inevitably run into, and get smacked down by, the U.S. Department of Labor.

      so there's three possibilities here: a) you're not actually a lawyer, because you have NO IDEA what you are talking about; b) you're a lawyer, but your practice was poor to the point of outright malpractice; or c) you're a lawyer, you're lying about what you are doing, and you should give me your name now so i can report you for an ethics violation under the model rules and your state's bar's ethics rules.

    11. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Problem is, it lists all the qualifications as identical. When one of them matters every single day, and the others are optional and probably are only necessary once a year, if at all.

      Often what happens is that the employer has one person they want, who is generally qualified for the job and who they want to hire. Then things get arranged to get the H1-B process done, basically after the interview or referral is done. Because you can't write a highly specific job app for one person until you know exactly who that one person is.

      Some confusion may be that people think unqualified people are taking these jobs but that is often not the case for jobs that actually require a reasonable amount of skill. This may be a person who worked at the company before and who everyone wants to rehire. But because of H1-B requirements they technically need to make sure there's no permanent resident or citizen who can do the job.

      Many people in HR don't even see this as unethical, it's the person that the team wants and so they're making that happen. But the problem is that technically it's a misrepresentation of the facts to the government (lying), which you can't get around even if the employee has a competitive salary and is not being pressured into long working hours.

    12. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by speedlaw · · Score: 3

      I was only the piano player. I did all the non immigration work there. I'm only reporting what I saw. Would it be better if I didn't report it ? I never appeared in any Imm proceedings, or drafted the paperwork, personally. Immigration is generally a very effed up area of law. All the illegals aren't wrong...they know there will be eventual amnesty, like in the past, and will show up with coffee cans full of cash to pay whatever penalty fee the INS comes up with.

    13. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      She's over there by the entrance, in the Goofy costume...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    14. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you witnessed crimes (you know that) and did nothing to stop it.

      do you REALLY want me to godwin you here? I'm sure you're not stupid. you knew better and yet stood by and allowed it.

      sorry to have to keep saying it, but you are scum. sleep well mr scumbag.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    15. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by viperidaenz · · Score: 2

      You physically can't touch the US with a 9 million mile bargepole even if you tried. You wouldn't be strong enough to life it and you would need to be out in space to hold the other end. Like way past the moon and part way to Mars out in space.

    16. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Fire_Wraith · · Score: 1

      I can think of one organization that would be very, very interested in someone who was - but they sure wouldn't be hiring anyone that wasn't an American citizen.

    17. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      c) you're a lawyer, you're lying about what you are doing, and you should give me your name now so i can report you for an ethics violation under the model rules and your state's bar's ethics rules.

      a) Violating the "model rules" is meaningless. Model laws and rules are an example and a suggestion, not actual laws or rules.

      b) What motivation do you think this individual could possibly have to tell you his name when you say this is what you are going to do if he does?

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    18. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by fightinfilipino · · Score: 1

      c) you're a lawyer, you're lying about what you are doing, and you should give me your name now so i can report you for an ethics violation under the model rules and your state's bar's ethics rules.

      a) Violating the "model rules" is meaningless. Model laws and rules are an example and a suggestion, not actual laws or rules.

      b) What motivation do you think this individual could possibly have to tell you his name when you say this is what you are going to do if he does?

      except in the realm of law, where the Model Rules of Professional Conduct hold quite a bit of sway with the individual state bars in the U.S.

      and the point was not to actually get whoever this is to "fess up." what speedlaw wrote is factually and legally wrong. incorrect. it's a rhetorical point.

    19. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many people in HR don't even see this as unethical,

      Yes, this and upper management also not knowing what is ethical is a HUGE part of the problem.

    20. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "this is laughably inaccurate..." UH? WHY?. Maybe it wasn't described well enough, but is very accurate instead, in many cases, at least for jobs over a certain level.

      At that level, "The key to success is making sure that only your guy can meet the job description that YOU create" simply means that (again, at a certain level, that of H1-B):

      A company needs somebody to fill a new, specific, real position, for a time long enough to require a visa (e.g. participate to develop some new product, completely restructure the IT infrastructure)

      the company finds the person that in its view really IS the best for the job, with criteria that often have nothing to do with raw salary, like internal company politics/strategies

        (e.g. companies may want to bring people who already work for them in overseas offices, who already proved themselves loyal, fit company culture etc, maybe know well some company proprietary tool needed for development... so they will do the job faster AND support the new product they have co-developed in their home countries when they go back home)

      only at that point, the company asks that person "tell us what you did in the last 5 years, which degree you have etc" and starts writing an H1-B request that DOES correspond to a position it really needs, but will only have that one matching candidate.

    21. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by amiga3D · · Score: 0

      Quit whining and get a job.

    22. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, the ignorance of youth.

      Wait until you grow up and have to move out...rent+job is all it takes.

    23. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a matter of being ignorant about ethics. It's a matter of not caring. There is very little incentive for the moneyed class to follow rules because a) they are rarely held accountable, b) when they are, it's usually a slap on the wrist, so c) it's nearly always a net gain to flaunt the rules even if you are caught.

    24. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ass.

    25. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Mr.+Shotgun · · Score: 2

      And what would you have him do my friend? With all those would would have the power to act upon all neatly bought and paid for? It has been an open secret for a long time that H1-B not about importing talent but a means to depress the market wages for a long time now. Yet suddenly his coming forward would break the tide? Please, the powers that be have been and will continue to sell the US public down the river just to get another coin in their pocket.

      You want change? Don't berate someone working a low level slot when shit started happening way above his pay grade and he had no one to turn to. Start looking at real solutions, like better representation from our elected officials. Course most of those are bought and paid for too so we are all supremely fucked.

      --
      Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the (supposed) good of its victims may be the most oppressive
    26. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      generally when you witness a crime the right thing to do is report it to the authorities, if he was scared of retribution then do it anonymously.

    27. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      name names. this anon shit is bullshit, fall on your sword for the good of the all.

    28. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Many people in HR don't even see this as unethical

      That's only because they have a unique definition of the word that most everyone else doesn't.

      Either it's an open job posting, in which case you advertise it in some way, or it's intended for a specific person, in which case you offer it directly to said person.

      It takes mental gymnastics and delusion to claim otherwise, something that corporate culture has in spades, and actively cultivates.

    29. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe. I worked in a place with a one-off H1-B hire for a position that "very likely" had other qualified candidates. It questionably requires a college degree ( two employees previous, the person in the position didn't have any degree, the advertisement only said it was 'desirable'). Ironically, they were also being payed *more* than the previous US citizen employees. It is totally weird that the position was filled with an H1-B, I have no idea why.

      In my one anecdotal experience, it may be lightly enforced for small places. Speculating, I wouldn't be shocked to learn that through the present, it also hasn't been heavily scrutinized for large places either.

      IANAL myself.
      I just read those things. I think you mean CFR 20, not CFR 22:
      [ http://www.uscis.gov/iframe/ilink/docView/SLB/HTML/SLB/0-0-0-1/0-0-0-29/0-0-0-3422.html ]
      [ http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/text-idx?SID=1f1838cd5c2c568a8e14468f62b61f4d&mc=true&node=pt20.3.655&rgn=div5#se20.3.655_1700 ]
        - Specifically, read 730 and 739.

      Nothing in these sections supports the claim you're making about the parent. The parent is saying that you can fudge the professional requirements, as obviously can be done. That becomes the 'real' position the company is hiring for. The proof that the position requires the skills is "they need to speak to our foreign constituents", easy enough. ESPECIALLY if these provisions regarding H1-B are lightly enforced.
      You may have more experience with this, but at a layman's reading, I don't see how anything you've pointed out refutes the parent's claims.

      Tangentially:
      I don't care about questioning this specific case. Of course it's a grey area and may have taken a job from a US citizen. But, the person is a good enough person both professionally and personally that in a 'world where good things happen' sort of sense, the US is better off having the person working here. I'm not gonna be the one that F-s them over.

    30. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Look at what happened to Snowden. Half of the fucking nation are convinced that he's a traitor.

    31. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahahahaha pathetic troll.

    32. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > you witnessed crimes (you know that) and did nothing to stop it.

      You are right in practice, if nobody acts... but wrong on not realizing that the rest of us does the same by merely having money in the bank or paying for insurances, or buying unrepairable items.
      How it is a crime is left as exercise for the reader.

    33. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is laughably inaccurate, to the point where i question if you're actually a lawyer.

      to satisfy the requirements for an H-1B, you have to show that the position you're filling 1) requires at minimum a bachelor's degree in a particular specialty, and 2) your candidate has at least that bachelor's degree, or the equivalent. the process is based on the actual, real position the company is filling, NOT the other way around as you've just described. the burden is on the employer to prove that the bona fide position is an H-1B specialty occupation. read INA 214(i)(3) and 22 CFR 655.700 to 655.855, if you haven't already (hint: if you were even touching H-1Bs as a lawyer, this is MANDATORY READING, especially the LCA provisions!).

      what you've described is...not the H-1B process. it's what more unscrupulous companies try to do with the PERM Labor Certification process for a green card, where they inevitably run into, and get smacked down by, the U.S. Department of Labor.

      so there's three possibilities here: a) you're not actually a lawyer, because you have NO IDEA what you are talking about; b) you're a lawyer, but your practice was poor to the point of outright malpractice; or c) you're a lawyer, you're lying about what you are doing, and you should give me your name now so i can report you for an ethics violation under the model rules and your state's bar's ethics rules.

      Either you're lying to protect your ass, or you've never worked in an H1-B shop.
      The laws are utterly game-able and very easy to do so.
      It's done on a regular basis.

      So if you're pretending that it doesn't happen, I have to ask - why are you lying?
      And when are you going to put your name out there so we can shop you to your bar association?

    34. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my entire life I've never met anyone who filled that requirement.

      That's the point.

    35. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by sjames · · Score: 1

      Or, many employers are more than happy to lie, cheat, and steal. One way is to wag the dog when creating job requirements. In fact, it's been documented time and again.

    36. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Would it matter? No one is going to verify the qualifications, as long as a 'candidate' comes through and the spot is filled. They'll see 'another H1B hired' for those concerned with the numbers. Simply put, this is state created, corporate sponsorship of contractual slavery to foreigners. The word disgusting doesn't cover it!

    37. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      If I also said he needed to be fluent in Mandarin and Farsi, I've just written an H1-B for my candidate.

      In my entire life I've never met anyone who filled that requirement.

      Yeah, and that's the point. You know there are people who fill that requirement, just not a lot of them in the US.

    38. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      and yes, I'm one of those who has been out of work WAY too long because I'm a white guy in the bay area and that means I'm 'too expensive'.

      If you're a programmer, that's not why you're out of work. You're out of work because you don't know how to look for a job. Stop with the hair-brained theories and try to figure out why your interviews are going so badly (it has nothing to do with visas).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    39. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's a lawyer (supposedly). All lawyers sleep well, thanks to a cocktail of bourbon, downers, and the lamentation of their clients upon receiving the bill. That, a lack of conscience and ethics will get you far in the business world.

    40. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's gotta eat too. You think he'd have any chance of doing something about that being a grunt at a *law* firm? They'd have his ass so clammed up in NDAs he wouldn't be able to take a shit for three years.

      This war is only going to be won by the media getting a goddamned clue, followed by the public getting a goddamned clue. The entire problem is due to the deceitful assholes voted into office. They need to be relieved of duty with a strong warning to anyone trying that same shit again.

    41. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you are wrong. It isn't a crime. No matter how much I agree or disagree what the law SHOULD be, it is what it is.

      I got the vibe that the guy USED to work there, i.e. doesn't anymore. Maybe this was one of the reasons for going elsewhere?

      Speedlaw: Immigration is generally a very effed up area of law.

      I married a foreigner 8 years ago, and she is now a citizen. My father-in-law, elderly and nearly deaf and blind, was taken to PRISON upon arrival for a visit because the person helping him fill out the visa form (which was APPROVED) had some mistakes. Now tell me, would a non-effed up system put an elderly retired professor in prison rather than just DENY the stupid form and send it back with a note to fix the mistakes?

      I have friends that are on H1Bs. I have friends that are refugees from governments that were trying to exterminate their tribe. I have friends you would probably call wetbacks. They are ALL people. Good people. I feel sorry for their situations, but not for them. They are all happier than the whiny entitled class that thinks they deserve better for no reason. My ancestors showed up on a boat, no lengthy application process or paperwork. Ever heard of the statue of liberty? Yup, no shit, it used to be true. Starving, poor, persecuted, no problem - welcome to the land of opportunity. Not so easy anymore.

      TheGratefulNet: and yes, I'm one of those who has been out of work WAY too long because I'm a white guy...

      No, I think I can spot the real reason after reading your 2 comments. You've got a victim mentality, seem to overreact, and come off like a flaming asshole. Look, I've been laid off from IT jobs. It sucks, but a bad attitude never helps. I've never been "out of work" for longer than I wanted to be, never collected any government benefits. When you are laid off, "getting a job" becomes your job, and like everything I do - I choose to do the best I can - and guess what happens pretty soon? I've also been the guy holding interviews to fill jobs on my team. I've sat across a table from guys like you, and when I detect that victim attitude guess what happens? Yeah, white or not doesn't matter. The magical H1B fairly has nothing to do with a bad attitude getting your resume round filed in a hurry.

      It's really too bad because, until this morning, I had some respect for you TheGratefulNet and have enjoyed some of your comments in the past.

    42. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by kaiser423 · · Score: 1

      If this is all true, how did Disney just pull what they did? How did lots of companies that displace their workers with H-1B's work around this? Genuinely curious.

    43. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You clearly aren't hanging out in the right bars.

    44. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >you witnessed crimes (you know that) and did nothing to stop it.

      Have you every physically restrained someone from jaywalking? Called the cops on them?

      Put that pedestal too high and you will fall off it as well.

    45. Re: Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He skipped math and physics classes to do the needful and revert the mails.

    46. Re: Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, he should spend the next couple of weeks getting 20 years of experience with Windows 10...

    47. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that they are abusing the system and purposefully making it so that a US worker couldn't apply. Sounds like the problem is that there *are* people who could replace this worker but more likely at higher wages. Congratulations, you're admitting to what everyone on ./ has been complaining about is really a problem, you're abusing the system to displace US workers and forcing that costs of the displaced worker onto the US taxpayers.

    48. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry you've copped a bit of flak over your past role. I can only guess at how many people are hurting because of this practice and I feel for them. Personally I'm grateful for you having shared your experience.

      I'm not in the US but like many western nations, NZ is only a decade or so behind North America on a lot of matters social, commercial and otherwise. It seems wise to keep an eye on the US mood, naturally for myself but also because of my general nerdly concern for geeks in need. Nobody who appreciates skills can easily witness good knowledge workers lose much or all of what they've achieved financially for no good reason. I feel quite sad when I think of those forced to sit on their hands while third parties do a poor job of the work they used to take pride in performing themselves.

      The first way to combat this 'corporate capture' of the H1B programme is a general understanding of its premise and mechanisms amongst the IT community. We're more than capable of understanding the legislation, although it is admittedly rather tedious reading. Anecdotes such as yours help us appreciate a little of the legal process, the administrative dodge and the half-truths that keep this race-to-the-bottom operation running.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    49. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Farsi is the official language in Iran, Afghanistan and Tajikistan. And just because you never met any, it doesn't mean they don't exist. If you're in the US, you probably don't meet many Iranians... After all, you only need one person out of ~120 million to be very interested in China, to make that statement true.

    50. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2

      You're in the Bay Area and out of work? Fuck, they're hiring here like it's 1999. If you don't have a job right now, it's your own problem.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    51. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      Okay, if that's true, then some states have taken the ABA's suggestion. What is relevant is still the individual state bars' ethics rules. Even if they adopt most of the model rules, anything they don't adopt or adopt in a modified form will not be the same as in the model rules.

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
    52. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my entire life I've never met anyone who filled that requirement.

      I'm sure out of the 1.3 billion Mandarin speakers, at least 1 speaks Farsi too. You just might need to move from wherever you live to China, where you are likely to find such a person. ;)

    53. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming that being fluent in english is also required.

    54. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      so, you admit openly to brazenly breaking the law?

      He didn't break the law, he complied with the letter but not the intent, which is how our system works. Of course a more sensible system would require lawmakers to write a statement of intent to accompany the letter of the law and for juries and judges to consider the intent of the laws, but that's the not the system we have.

    55. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems to me like he admits it's a stupid law... Maybe we should stop voting for candidates who supports H1B programs? I don't think scolding everyone who defects on prisoner's dilemmas will solve anything.

    56. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I needed a jumbo jet guy who also could work on Bleriot biplanes...

      Bleriot was primarily involved in monoplanes. Poking about on Wikipedia, I see the unsuccessful III and IV and the never completed X, perhaps the VI if you're willing to count tandem wings as a biplane, but the remainder of his designs are monoplanes.

    57. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was only the piano player.

      Oblig. joke: Don't tell speedlaw's mom he's a lawyer. She thinks he's a piano player in a whorehouse.

    58. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That video has nothing to do with H-1Bs... it's about the PERM process when applying for permanent residency. Unfortunately, if you would actually be honest in this process without pulling these sort of tricks, it would take you forever to get your case approved. This is why law firms pull these stunts...

    59. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      generally when you witness a crime the right thing to do is report it to the authorities, if he was scared of retribution then do it anonymously.

      I agree in principle. But practically speaking, we both know how far that would have gone.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    60. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, you mean promising mediocre pay and stock options that you can wipe your ass with after the company tanks, just so you can have the "privilege" of commuting 5 days a week through Bay-Area traffic from some Garden Spot like (un)Pleasanton?

      Thanks, buddy. Thanks a lot.

    61. Re: Used to work at an immigration firm by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      No idjit, it's called: Get that chip off your shoulder and focus your resume and your interviews into all about what you can do for that company. It took me 13 fucking years to learn that one myself, and I got absolutely nowhere until a brain injury completely broke the part that had the "victim chip". It also broke the part of my brain that processes fear. The upside, I don't play what-if scenarios to death in my head anymore. I'd say that I realized that it was an exercise in futility... but it's more a switch got flipped where I don't care one way or another anymore. The downside... it's really hard for me to empathize with other people. I can do it, but it takes a lot of effort, now. Another downside is now I have trouble pronouncing larger words and sometimes finding the right words for what I want to convey.

      The point here is people are just as able to sense fear as dogs are. If you go into the interview and have a meek attitude or appear too desperate, you're gonna be circle filed in anything but the smaller Mom & Pops (and if you're too bad, even then). If you go in and make a showing like you'd be able to own the position, and it wouldn't be too much skin off your back if you didn't get it, your prospect just shot up considerably. A humble showing isn't going to get you anywhere, and neither is a "shit don't stink" showing. You've gotta show that you've got the cajones to handle anything that comes at you, but the personality that's gonna help those around you to not be completely put off.

    62. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Come on, admit it. You had to have snickered just a little.

    63. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put the hippy books away and get out into the real world.

    64. Re: Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It only takes one.

    65. Re:Used to work at an immigration firm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm one of those who has been out of work WAY too long because I'm a white guy in the bay area and that means I'm 'too expensive'.
      Then you are probably not that good. Me and most people I know in the start-up scene in San Francisco get recruiter calls *daily* at least. The competition for qualified talent is insane. I get paid 6$K for referrals at my company, and I don't care about age, gender, race, nationality, whatever. I need the people with the right skills, and I cannot hire fast enough. Oh, and we pay well too. What we don't do is H1-Bs.

  11. Re:What's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These contractors are indentured servants of the contracting company. They are forbidden from looking for another job and must do as they are told for the 2 years they are here. Then poof, they are gone and a new set of indentured servants are sent in.

    I hope Disney gets hacked like Sony did and all the dirty email can be hung out for all to see.

  12. Even 'merica hates 'merica by MeNeXT · · Score: 2

    That's how it seems to me. God bless America but not Americans.

    --
    DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    1. Re:Even 'merica hates 'merica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or God bless corporate shareholders but not country or its citizens. Whats good for most Americans is not Wall Street's prosperity. Wall Street is the Trojan Horse and simplest vector of attack from foreign interests, competitors, and enemies. The only criteria for influence is anonymous cash. All dollars are created equal in our democracy while all individuals are condemned to inequality and unfair policy.

    2. Re:Even 'merica hates 'merica by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      this is disney; and so, americans are put back into 'the vault' for future release at a date yet to be determined...

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:Even 'merica hates 'merica by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Preferring cheap foreign labor to the American worker in't even that complicated. It just comes down to power; any show of patriotism is just that -- show. When you think about all of the flag waving you see in Marvel, ESPN, ABC News, and the other affiliates of D, the juxtaposition between this story and their narrative makes their whole company look pretty darn disingenuous, to anyone who is paying attention.

  13. The Winter of Discontent by LifesABeach · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why does America still wallow in a recession? It is by those that beat the drum for the H1B harvest.

    1. Re:The Winter of Discontent by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Informative

      Bro, calm the rhetoric, America exited the recession by the end of 2009. (If 'recession is not what you meant, the use a word that means what you meant).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:The Winter of Discontent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're technically correct but only because we're all forced to use a stupid definition for "recession".

      The only age group that hasn't seen its labor participation rate fall are those that are 55 and older. For everyone else, the jobs are scarce.

    3. Re:The Winter of Discontent by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You're technically correct but only because we're all forced to use a stupid definition for "recession".

      If you don't know how to use a word, then why are you using it? Words have definitions. Use the word that means what you want, not the one that doesn't.

      This is not complicated.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:The Winter of Discontent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brah, the stock market exited the recession six years ago, as for the rest of us? Some are still waiting.

    5. Re:The Winter of Discontent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bro, calm the rhetoric, America exited the recession by the end of 2009.

      Dude! Obama fixed everything as soon as you elected Obama! Dude!

    6. Re:The Winter of Discontent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh bullshit. They cooked the books. It's still a recession.

    7. Re:The Winter of Discontent by Ignacio · · Score: 2

      This is not a recession, it's the new status quo. Unless the greed stops. Which it won't.

    8. Re:The Winter of Discontent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Languages change. See dumbing down.

      Dumbing down is a deliberate diminution of the intellectual level of education, literature, cinema, news, and culture. The term "dumbing down" originated in 1933 as movie-business slang, used by motion picture screenplay writers, meaning: "[to] revise so as to appeal to those of little education or intelligence".[1] The nature of dumbing-down varies according to the subject matter and the reason for diminishing the intellectual level of the subject or topic, but it usually involves the over-simplification of critical thought to the degree of undermining the intellectual standards of language and of learning; thus tending to trivialise cultural, artistic, and academic standards, as in the case of popular culture.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dumbing_down

    9. Re:The Winter of Discontent by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      By what skewed metric? The economy and unemployment continued to suck for years past 2009.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    10. Re:The Winter of Discontent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He meant "fuck barrel".

    11. Re:The Winter of Discontent by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      The standard metric.....when the economy shrinks, it's a recession. When the economy grows, it's not a recession.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:The Winter of Discontent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about YOU calm it. We didn't exit it. Haven't yet.

    13. Re:The Winter of Discontent by FirstOne · · Score: 1

      If one under-reports the real inflation rate, the net difference appears to be economic growth.

      Try looking at some numbers that haven't been mangled by the feds.. FYI Ground beef is now 3.00$/lb, Rib-eye is 8.00$/lb, and still going up just like everything else. Here is a link explaining how our government mangled inflation stats.

      If you need more proof, just look at the near zero interest rates for savings or short term CD's. That should be a red flag that all is not well.

    14. Re:The Winter of Discontent by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If one under-reports the real inflation rate [shadowstats.com], the net difference appears to be economic growth

      Using a crappier measurement of inflation doesn't improve your argument.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    15. Re:The Winter of Discontent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about healthy employment? This is colloquially accepted as a metric for the common man to mean "recession." The unemployment rate is still at 5.5%, it hasn't been below 5% in the US since 2007. That's pretty severe in modern terms.

    16. Re:The Winter of Discontent by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      usually "the definition" is 2 or more quarters of negative growth.

      on the other hand rigid language definitions can often disguise what is really going on.

      technical truth is often a pretext for putting lipstick on a pig.

    17. Re:The Winter of Discontent by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      That seems like a better metric, but anything under 6% is 'full employment.' You don't want 100% employment because there will always be people who quit to look for new jobs, etc.

      Instead of merely looking at the unemployment number, also look at the number of people who have been searching for over six months, and how many have dropped out of the workforce completely (although to get a clear picture, you should also try to determine why they dropped out).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    18. Re:The Winter of Discontent by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Then say what is going while also being technically accurate. To do otherwise makes you look ignorant.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  14. enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Kim Berry, president of the Programmer's Guild, said Congress should protect American workers by mandating that positions can only be filled by H-1B workers when no qualified American — at any wage — can be found to fill the position."

    uhhh...enforcement of any such "protection" is up to the executive, not the legislative branch. Where's Obama (and the Justice dept.) on this?

    1. Re:enforcement by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

      at any wage = min wage so we can't find a US worker at min wage willing to work a min of 40 hours a week with NO OT pay for hours that likely are needed on top of that.

    2. Re:enforcement by damnbunni · · Score: 1

      They can't enforce it until Congress mandates it.

    3. Re:enforcement by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      the last 2 contract jobs I had, the employer insisted that I bring 'my' work laptop home with me each nite. when I explained that I'm not paid beyond 8 hours a day (hey, it was YOU, mr employer, who forced contract on me; I would have gone f/t if offered the chance but nooooo! you didn't want that, did you?) - they simply said that everyone takes their laptop home. its expected.

      they want it both ways. no benes for you, ability to can your ass on a moment's notice and yet they expect you to work for them before the workday begins and after it ends; all for fixed income and, again, NO benes. when the US monday holidays come around, guess who can only bill 32 hours that week while everyone else gets their 40?

      I'm seriously sick of this shit!!

      all I can say is: its a good goddamned thing that I am not a violent person and don't have any tendancy to want to buy a gun. but I am just waiting for the first 'nothing left to lose' IT guy to go truly postal and make the news. maybe that's what's needed, afterall (?)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if they had insurance for it, if it were stolen. Since they pressured you into taking it home it isn't your responsibility.

    5. Re:enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you bring it home, right? But do you have to turn it on?

    6. Re:enforcement by sound+vision · · Score: 1

      Whenever there's a shooting people start talking about gun control more than the underlying problem. It's just one more manifestation of intellectual laziness. It's a lot easier to say "Well, let's just take all the weapons away" (as if that genie can be put back in the bottle), than it is to look at the economic/societal/personal problems that caused the attack and come up with a way to fix that.

    7. Re: enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we can't just hold corporations and management accountable, can we? I mean, afterall, those special snowfwakes might cwy :*(

    8. Re:enforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All it would take is 1 disgruntled IT person at a crucial point to destroy the US economy overnight costing billions.

    9. Re:enforcement by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      the last 2 contract jobs I had, the employer insisted that I bring 'my' work laptop home with me each nite. when I explained that I'm not paid beyond 8 hours a day (hey, it was YOU, mr employer, who forced contract on me; I would have gone f/t if offered the chance but nooooo! you didn't want that, did you?) - they simply said that everyone takes their laptop home. its expected.

      they want it both ways. no benes for you, ability to can your ass on a moment's notice and yet they expect you to work for them before the workday begins and after it ends; all for fixed income and, again, NO benes. when the US monday holidays come around, guess who can only bill 32 hours that week while everyone else gets their 40?

      All the contract bullshit pisses me off too. I am looking for a new job (my boss sucks and I don't get projects to keep my skills current) and I see so many job descriptions that read like a full-time position but are actually 6 month contracts. Seriously? They want a Systems Admin with 3 years of VMWare and SAN experience, Active Directory, backup, Exchange, firewall and LAN/WAN but they only need it for 6 months? That's a permanent, full-time position. But they say it's contract.

      Well, guess what? I'm not applying for that position. Why would I give up a full-time job with benefits for a 6 month or 1 year contract? I see many jobs I think I'm qualified for, but so many of them are posted as contract when the description is clearly for a full-time permanent position.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    10. Re:enforcement by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Just because you take your laptop home at night doesn't mean you have to actually use it at home.

      If you do work at home, you bill for those hours, right? If not, you have nobody but yourself to blame for being exploited.

  15. Re:What's the problem by BradMajors · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because it is illegal to replace employees with H-1B contractors,

  16. The Problem is Wage Discrimination by Chalnoth · · Score: 2

    The complaint is that companies are hiring people from outside the US because they can pay them less. The answer to that is simple: crack down on wage discrimination.

    1. Re:The Problem is Wage Discrimination by tommeke100 · · Score: 1

      I know in Belgium if you have skilled foreign employees you actually need to pay them at least a certain amount according to their degree.
      Which is sometimes annoying for these employees because it makes them harder to get hired (because of the lower-bound) if they lose their job as well.
      We had a PhD (this is at least 10 yrs ago, so laws may have changed) who got fired because of restructuring in the company (not his fault), and he was complaining about this.

  17. No H1-Bs for contractors by whoever57 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The H1-B program should be changed such that only the company that is the end recipient of the work product of the H1-B worker can apply for a visa.

    Those companies that provide on-site engineers to other companies should not qualify for H1-B visa sponsorship. In this way many abuses would be stopped.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:No H1-Bs for contractors by clovis · · Score: 1

      The H1-B program should be changed such that only the company that is the end recipient of the work product of the H1-B worker can apply for a visa.

      Those companies that provide on-site engineers to other companies should not qualify for H1-B visa sponsorship. In this way many abuses would be stopped.

      Indeed, that would help a lot.
      Also, in my dream world, the hiring companies that claims they have a need for H1-B workers must apply to some agency (federal or NGO) for their H1-B employees.
      That agency would have on file resumes of any US citizen workers that are interested in having their resumes on file as well as the H1-B applicants.
      The agency would be mandated to to send US citizens from the pool as applicants for interviews, and not until all qualified or semi-qualified citizens (that wanted the job) had received an on-site interview would that company be allowed to interview an H1-B worker. No email interviews, no phone interviews, no skype interviews unless the worker asked for such through the agency.
      After that pool is exhausted, then H1-B can be interviewed.

      Furthermore, any company that hires H1-B employees must pay 10x the usual rate pay into the fed and state unemployment insurance agencies.

    2. Re:No H1-Bs for contractors by hibiki_r · · Score: 2

      It'd help in many ways, but it also makes the H1-Bs situation far more precarious. Modern abuse and quotas means almost all H1-Bs come from those nasty companies, but even before that, many people chose contracting firms to handle their immigration because you are far safer from layoffs and such. I remember when I was an H1-B, a long time ago, going direct, and my then employer had round after round of layoffs. The moment I saw the pattern, I had to look for another job IMMEDIATELY, because getting hit by one of those layoffs meant a tiny window to find another employer or leave the country, and that new employer had to file for a visa. Through a contracting firm, a layoff might mean a job change, and maybe not getting paid for a few weeks, but it's far less onerous. This gets even harder when also applying for a green card. It's not uncommon for companies to ask immigrants that they want to sponsor to sign that they have to pay the immigration fees incurred in the green card process if they leave willingly before the green card is done plus one year. When going with direct employment, it also means you cannot run without taking a major financial penalty. And if you are laid off in process, then you better get a job extremely quickly, or your green card process might have to start all over again, and it can take many years.Getting my green card got a big weight off my shoulders.

      So your proposed change to the H1-B program sounds like a wonderful idea as long as it comes together with something to minimize the precarious conditions of H1-B workers that easily qualify for green cards, and work in the US for 5, 10 years while they wait for a visa number. This should help American workers too, as the minute one of those workers gets a green card, their job mobility increases, and with it, their negotiation power. I got a 30% raise with my first job change after a green card. In 5 years after the green card, my salary more than doubled.

      Having people as temporary workers for a decade? You've got to be kidding me.

    3. Re:No H1-Bs for contractors by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      I write from experience. I had 2 spells on H1-B visas, both times, I was directly employed (not through a contracting firm). The first time, I went back to my home country at the end of my expat assignment. The second time, I stayed long enough to get a green card -- I had already changed jobs after starting the H1-B.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    4. Re:No H1-Bs for contractors by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      The US should be making it far easier for H1B's to get green cards and then get citizenship. Obviously, most H1B's have valuable skills and giving them a "fast track" to citizenship is very much inline with the idea of "the best and brightest" being US citizens. It shows that the H1B is highly skilled, understands US culture (eventually, after a few months of working here), and probably wants to be a US citizen. We SHOULD be welcoming people like yourself with open arms...instead of the current corporate indentured servant system. Highly skilled, intelligent, hard-working immigrants made the USA what it is today...our strength is through our diversity. But I'm not a CEO fixated on next quarter's results...I'm a citizen who wants the country to do better over-all over the long term.

    5. Re:No H1-Bs for contractors by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      They also need to evaluate the qualifications stated, have a competent technical person who can determine if the stated qualifications are reasonable, and review the qualifications of the person who eventually gets the job.

      Otherwise they do they old "Requires 8 years experience in SQL Server 2014" shuffle. It's an impossible requirement, so no American can claim to "meet the requirements." If you say on your resume you do have 8 years experience in SQL Server 2014 (because it's not that different from previous versions) they reject you for "lying" and say "ugh, see, we really can't find any Americans to fill this position! They're not even honest, lying about their qualifications!" Then they hire the H1-B and ignore the stated requirement.

      None of this will ever happen, of course.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  18. Cost cutting? by phantomfive · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The fired workers believe the primary motivation behind Disney's action was cost-cutting.

    Is there anyone who believes that wasn't the primary motivation? Even the corporate spin: "focus on future innovation" is standard corporate-speak for "spending money elsewhere."

    It's not even 'spin,' that is the most straightforward way to interpret Disney's corporate statement.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Cost cutting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      while I don't actually disagree with you...I do know that "long time employees" can often be collecting dust. I've worked with some EXCELLENT long-timers, but also a great many who are basically gliding along in neutral, no longer caring to stay up on latest technologies or techniques, doing just enough to get by. But really this is about cost cutting #1.

  19. The boss is here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  20. We need UNIONS in IT by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    With out them we can be replaced by contractors and it's the contract firm that is the one useing the H1B's

    1. Re:We need UNIONS in IT by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      With out them we can be replaced by contractors and it's the contract firm that is the one useing the H1B's

      Problem with that is you that you would create the Walmart effect. Go Google Walmart closes dozens of stores? Why? Local unions won in 4 states. All of the sudden they mysteriously had to close due to plumbing issues for 4 months at a time in the same areas. Uh how did that happen?

      There are so many IT positions available and not enough jobs that unions are not needed. Ask any recruiter and he or she will tell you how hard it is to find someone that can even hold onto a job for more than1 year as everyone is employed. I found the argument BS.

      Let's say theoretically you are right? There are not enough jobs. Wages pay about $10 - $15 an hour (since they do not we know IT still has jobs lefts unfilled because of high wages) and we unionize. All of the sudden no IT jobs at all would be here. With telecommunications equipment we would become 100% Indian and would just suffer the productivity losses and business process changes to not pay.

      At the end of the day the customer always decides the demand. Not the other way around. In this case the customer is the employer and if he can find a way to find someone just as qualified for cheaper he should be rewarded for this. Are you really saying you do not have the skillsets as someone with no plumbing and language barrier issues who is fresh out of school?? If so the problem is you.

      Companies hire Americans because we know more and are right there with better business processes and the employer is willing to pay extra for this. It is capitalism.

    2. Re:We need UNIONS in IT by tlambert · · Score: 1

      With out them we can be replaced by contractors and it's the contract firm that is the one useing the H1B's

      People say this, but if you work in the context of a union, you might as work for a contracting agency, and skip a step. For most U.S. states, being in a union is a pretty useless activity, for everyone but the union itself, since most IT jobs are in "at will" states. Do not think that this is not *why* most of those jobs are in those states.

      I have *never* sen a successful unionization of a programming shop; they fall apart, and are reformed almost immediately with non-union employees.

    3. Re:We need UNIONS in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      UNION!

    4. Re:We need UNIONS in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Big business is passing laws to effect the supply. If they want to hire non-american workers while they avoid paying US taxes. MOVE!

    5. Re:We need UNIONS in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      H1Bs and outsourcing keeps wages artificially low by making me compete in my own country with companies in my own country with people living in places where they pay less for food, transportation, rent, entertainment, clothing, and medicine than I pay just for rent.

      Unions keep wages artificially low by making it difficult or impossible for me to negotiate my own compensation based on my own negotiation skills, talent, experience, and work ethic.

    6. Re:We need UNIONS in IT by Jahta · · Score: 1

      With out them we can be replaced by contractors and it's the contract firm that is the one useing the H1B's

      At the end of the day the customer always decides the demand. Not the other way around. In this case the customer is the employer and if he can find a way to find someone just as qualified for cheaper he should be rewarded for this. Are you really saying you do not have the skillsets as someone with no plumbing and language barrier issues who is fresh out of school?? If so the problem is you.

      Companies hire Americans because we know more and are right there with better business processes and the employer is willing to pay extra for this. It is capitalism.

      No, it is neo-liberalism.

      The notion of "the market" as an impartial arbiter of price rests on the concept of "perfect competition"; that is where all players are essentially equal and none can unduly influence price. What neo-liberalism has given us is situation where a minority of wealthy players can distort the market to their own advantage. This is particularly true in the labour market, where outsourcing/off-shoring is being used (in countries like the UK, as well as the US) to create a cheap (and compliant) workforce. Quality is an afterthought, if it's considered at all.

    7. Re:We need UNIONS in IT by guruevi · · Score: 1

      So we can pay dues to a large corporation and still get nothing out of it?

      Unions are not what they used to be, they used to be ran for workers that did menial jobs that anyone could do so everyone that did the same job would get equal treatment and wages. Nowadays they're just the middle man to the "you're getting fucked" train. IT isn't a menial job anyone could do, a good IT person (programmer, sysadmin etc) is more like a lawyer or a doctor, highly specialized, well trained individuals that are very hard to replace.

      Programmers and sysadmins need to make sure they can't be easily replaced. Stop saying that 'anyone can program with language x' because not anyone can program. Most people can't even program a box if you gave them LOGO. Most of the college grads or H1B'ers shouldn't be able to do your job, if they can, then you're not as special or good as you think you are (unless you're a college grad or H1B'er yourself). If you have 5 years or more experience and you're able to be replaced by an H1B'er, then you haven't learned anything. If some PHB decides to replace you anyway, they should be begging you to come back in a few months. Happened to me quite a few times.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    8. Re:We need UNIONS in IT by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      You lost me there. I don't understand why Billy Gates is the "neo liberal". You come across more critical of the free market, which suggests you are more "neo liberal".

  21. Re:What's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In that way H1B workers are perfect for American businesses. The workers can't find new work, can't be hired away from your company, don't have any leverage for increased pay or benefits. It's everything Steve Jobs wanted when he colluded with other Silicon Valley CEOs to suppress worker pay.

  22. How can this be leagle? by bjwest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, this H-1B shit needs to stop now. Until we're at 99% employment rate for whatever field we're importing workers for, they need to be shipped back to whatever country they came from. This is worse than the illegal imigrant, because these guys are diaplacing current American workers and taking jobs we have people dyeing to fill.

    Every single one of those fired need to get together and file a class action against Disney, and this needs to be posted all over the social sites. Disney is no more a family company than Jack the Ripper was an exceptional lover. This needs to backlash on them, and hard.

    --

    --- Keep the choice with the user..
    1. Re:How can this be leagle? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      Perhaps if you could spell dying correctly your skills would be more valued to your employer over an Indian?

      Who do you think you are to tell someone else how to run their company?

      Let me ask you this? Did you drink Coffee today? Who mows your lawn? Do you eat out at expensive restaurants every lunch? No? Then how are you any different?

      You paid someone little wages picking your coffee beans. A Mexican probably mows your lawn. You go to fast food for lunch to save money and pay an immigrant a could portion of the time to spend $7 and not $19 at Chillis etc. Why is this any different? It is tyranny for the government to get involved and if these workers can not compete with a college kid who barely speaks English with no plumbing after years of experience it sounds to me they were overpaid anyway.

    2. Re:How can this be leagle? by bjwest · · Score: 1

      You seem to think you know an awful lot about me just because I misused a word (dyeing is spelled correctly, and if I were speaking and used dyeing instead of dying, you'd be none to wiser).

      1. I drink fair trade coffee.
      2. Last year had someone down on his luck mow my lawn, this year, as soon as this damn rain stops, I'll most likely mow it myself.
      3. I don't eat out at all. I cook my own food and don't eat pre-processed crap.
      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    3. Re:How can this be leagle? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Legal. Displacing. Dying.

      Anyway. What does this story have to do with immigration specifically? Would the situation be considered acceptable if the IT department were laid off, and lower paid Americans were contracted in to continue the work? And if so, why?

    4. Re:How can this be leagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know much as I would love personally to come to the US on a visa of some kind, this type of shit makes me sick. Fuck Disney and fuck the Indian H1B abusers.

    5. Re:How can this be leagle? by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      Yes, we should give up sovereignty in the country and have our own government sell us out because I might eat at Chili's once in a while. It's different because the government is bypassing federal laws (immigrations to say the least) to employ these people for lower wages. It is the most classic display of globalization used against the American worker to make the 0.0001% wealthier.

    6. Re:How can this be leagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not legal. The laid-off workers are completely in their right to sue as class action. That is, if the story is true and is not intentionally misleading.

    7. Re:How can this be leagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no and no. I don't drink coffee. I mow my own lawn. I never eat out - EVER.

      Next?

      How did the USA manage before massive non-white immigration?

    8. Re:How can this be leagle? by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      just because I misused a word (dyeing is spelled correctly, and if I were speaking and used dyeing instead of dying, you'd be none to wiser).

      Judging from the context of your post I'd gently advise you to be careful with those linguistic gymnastics, you might injure yourself. :-p

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    9. Re:How can this be leagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL at the user name and "Chillis" being the expensive restaurant. Aim a little higher my friend!

    10. Re:How can this be leagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Leagle"
      "Dyeing"

      No wonder you're unemployed.

    11. Re:How can this be leagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You misspelled a lot of words. "Leagle" => legal, "Diaplacing" => displacing, "Imigrant" => immigrant.

      It's like you're *trying* to troll.

    12. Re:How can this be leagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you drink Coffee today?

      No. It smells nasty. I never want to know what it tastes like.

      Who mows your lawn?

      Usually me, sometimes my kid.

      Do you eat out at expensive restaurants every lunch?

      No, I bring lunch from home.

      A Mexican probably mows your lawn.

      Really? Is that a California thing, or what? Most people in my neighborhood (including the Mexicans) mow their own, although the guy on the corner once paid my kid to do it.
      I suppose it's possible that my lifestyle is in the minority. I think you never considered that yours might be.

    13. Re:How can this be leagle? by RavenLrD20k · · Score: 1

      Did you drink Coffee today? Who mows your lawn? Do you eat out at expensive restaurants every lunch?

      Yes. But it's ok because it wasn't harvested by a mexican, it was harvested by a civet.

      Nobody... I have a car parked out there somewhere, just can't see it.

      I eat out almost every night... My wife loves it too. No expensive restaurant required.

    14. Re:How can this be leagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should refrain from Grammar Nazi-ing...YOUR skills would be more valued at that point...

  23. Sing it! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    I can't go on the "small small world" ride now without thinking of it as their sourcing plan.

  24. This move is rational for a public company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Posting AC because, you know... This is going to be unpopular, but It's the trajectory that I see in Tech management in large enterprises.

    This isn't shocking. I built my career during the IT and dot-com boom, moved into management, and then into executive positions. I fear this path is no longer available.

    Why? Young companies need competent tech workers who can perform, and they need them fast. Once the company scales and competition eats into margins and profitability, they cut cost, that means firing expensive domestic workers and using overseas/contract headcount. Disney is doing the mechanically rational thing for a mature public company.

    "Fucking evil management", you say? Well, grow up kiddies. This is what the board, shareholders, and investors demand - increased YoY profitability, which can be achieved, partly, by cutting costs.

    This will continue. It will get worse. It's a race to the bottom, so get used to it. The barriers to becoming an IT worker have vanished, and people can work globally. You don't like it? Unionize or advocate trade barriers (which IT will not do), but business will seek the lowest cost option to achieve their business objectives.

    Oh, and just wait until AI/automation scales up... My prediction: IT as a profession won't be around in 5 years.

    1. Re:This move is rational for a public company by Billly+Gates · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Posting AC because, you know... This is going to be unpopular, but It's the trajectory that I see in Tech management in large enterprises.

      This isn't shocking. I built my career during the IT and dot-com boom, moved into management, and then into executive positions. I fear this path is no longer available.

      Why? Young companies need competent tech workers who can perform, and they need them fast. Once the company scales and competition eats into margins and profitability, they cut cost, that means firing expensive domestic workers and using overseas/contract headcount. Disney is doing the mechanically rational thing for a mature public company.

      "Fucking evil management", you say? Well, grow up kiddies. This is what the board, shareholders, and investors demand - increased YoY profitability, which can be achieved, partly, by cutting costs.

      This will continue. It will get worse. It's a race to the bottom, so get used to it. The barriers to becoming an IT worker have vanished, and people can work globally. You don't like it? Unionize or advocate trade barriers (which IT will not do), but business will seek the lowest cost option to achieve their business objectives.

      Oh, and just wait until AI/automation scales up... My prediction: IT as a profession won't be around in 5 years.

      Load of gabage,

      A decade ago I believe the scary posts like yours and wife demanded I quit programming as Indians would have these jobs by now. Worse mistake EVER! I would have been rich if I did not major in business. Going back into IT now but man 10 years of experience gone and starting over the past few years sucked.

      It is 2015 and we were told by 2010 no IT would exist. Well much of it is coming back as demand is rising due to failed outsourcing attemps and management realizing with IE 6 and XP last year they fucked up by being shoe strung budgets that hampered their basic infrastructures for too long. Programmers today are pulling in $65,000 a year WITH 0 EXPERIENCE!

    2. Re:This move is rational for a public company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Load of gabage,

      A decade ago I believe the scary posts like yours and wife demanded I quit programming as Indians would have these jobs by now. Worse mistake EVER! I would have been rich if I did not major in business. Going back into IT now but man 10 years of experience gone and starting over the past few years sucked.

      It is 2015 and we were told by 2010 no IT would exist. Well much of it is coming back as demand is rising due to failed outsourcing attemps and management realizing with IE 6 and XP last year they fucked up by being shoe strung budgets that hampered their basic infrastructures for too long. Programmers today are pulling in $65,000 a year WITH 0 EXPERIENCE!

      Nice anecdote, but I suggest you crack open those business textbooks and refresh on the difference between micro and macroeconomics. These trends are structural and will continue as frictionless supplies of IT skills undercut costly domestic workers - only so long as automation rises to the task.

    3. Re:This move is rational for a public company by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      $65k? you can't even live in the bay area on that unless you live 'dorm style' with 2 people per bedroom and 3 or more BR's per house or apartment.

      but he's right that IT is a race to the bottom. we need unions. we won't get them because young kids think they are invinceable and its ONLY young kids who are being hired. you think this is a coincidence? young kids also tend not to use insurance and their insurance costs are much lower, hence the cost to the company is much lower.

      finally, companies are using more and more 'contractors' and so they can avoid paying ANY benefits to them while keeping them just as many hours and only paying 40/week (yes, personally been there, had that done to me).

      "mammas, don't let your babies grow up to be programmers"

      sad but there's no future in this. none. fucking sucks!!

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:This move is rational for a public company by ADRA · · Score: 1

      "Had it done to me"

      Pardon? You signed a contract, and if they didn't honor your agreement by paying for your proscribed hours, take them to court for breach of contract. The only retarded thing that you could've done was have a fixed maximum hours worked, in which case they can't demand your time in excess. As a contractor, you sure as hell aren't bound by the same "work till you drop" technique salaried employees are legally subjected to.

      --
      Bye!
    5. Re:This move is rational for a public company by rwa2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yep, that, and Disney is... special. I left Disney IT just before last October; it had already become a pretty stressful place to work. Morale was already super-low, because they had just launched the new version of their website that they'd been working on for 5 years and everyone was burned out from working *crunch* shifts through nights and weekends trying to finish developing the thing and then helping it limp along during its initial years. Coming out of development mode and going into sustainment mode, and then they burned through lots of operations budget dealing with all of the tech debt from the rush job, and then made up for it by laying off a bunch of good managers (like mine) and trying to put the squeeze on the remaining staff.

      Since Disney is one of the top brands in the US, they actually take pride in how little they can pay their employees (er, "cast members") below market rates, in exchange for being associated with The Mouse. Burnout and turnover was pretty high, few people lasted more than three years (incidentally the amount of time until their pension vests). I got tired of the squeeze and took a job elsewhere for much higher pay. Also managed to snag a guy interviewing for my old job at Disney because his recruiter told him to ask me about his concerns over work/life balance.

      To be fair, I did get a lot of experience working at Disney... since they don't believe in "reduce variation" they had one of almost everything in production somewhere since old sites never died but were always maintained for use by some niche customer (er, "guest" / "partner"). I'm sure my Disney friends and co-workers will turn out all right or better than they were at that puppy mill, I actually kinda feel more concerned for the H1Bs that will be tending to their fires and burning through their lives at both ends.

    6. Re:This move is rational for a public company by rossz · · Score: 1

      It is illegal to hire an H1-B worker if the position can be filled by a legal resident/citizen. You've just admitted that you break the law. So fuck you. Yes, you are evil management. I hope you lose your job, your pension, and your wife fucks the poolboy.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    7. Re:This move is rational for a public company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >A decade ago I believe the scary posts like yours and wife demanded I quit programming as Indians would have these jobs by now. Worse mistake EVER! I would have been rich if I did not major in business.

      No, you would not be rich. At best you would have earned $120k/year, probably $80k after taxes. That is comfortable, but not rich.

      Those predictions were early, but not wrong. IT will shrink considerably as a profession, but not for the reasons everyone thinks. The real reason is that IT is no long a highly skilled labor. As technology grows, it becomes easier to use; the same is true for developer tools and libraries. The level of skill needed to achieve results is getting lower and lower.

      Sure, there will be need for highly skilled developers to solve big problems, but as today those jobs are few and far between. Most IT work will either be automated completely, or simplified enough to where a person with limited skill can do the job.

      It's somewhat ironic that IT may be one of the first victims of automation, instead of the last like everyone expects.

    8. Re:This move is rational for a public company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $65K is above average, especially with 0 experience, and makes you rich in much of the country. The bay area is a crappy place to live. You can move anywhere else, except maybe New York City, and be better off.

    9. Re:This move is rational for a public company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Unions

      Oh yeah. Unions will work SWELL for IT. Like it did for the automobile industry.

    10. Re:This move is rational for a public company by GbrDead · · Score: 1

      Load of cabbage

      FTFY

    11. Re:This move is rational for a public company by AntronArgaiv · · Score: 1

      It is illegal to hire an H1-B worker if the position can be filled by a legal resident/citizen. You've just admitted that you break the law. So fuck you. Yes, you are evil management. I hope you lose your job, your pension, and your wife fucks the poolboy.

      It is illegal to hire an H1-B worker if the position can be filled by a legal resident/citizen. You've just admitted that you break the law. So fuck you. Yes, you are evil management. I hope you lose your job, your pension, and your wife fucks the poolboy.

      To quote a famous person: "When the President does it, that means it's not illegal"

      Yes, I know what happened to him.

      But that's the attitude in the top echelons of Disney, I suspect. Sure, it's illegal to fire a bunch of US workers and replace them with H1Bs. So what? What's the penalty for a billion-dollar megacorp like Disney? Is the Justice Dept going to take them to court over a bunch of IT workers? A few backhanders to the right congresscritters, and the investigation disappears.

      These megacorps have bought the US government. And if you don't believe it, ask the (former) IT staff at Disney.

    12. Re:This move is rational for a public company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, you've managed to post one of the dumbest things I've read in my life. Congrats.

    13. Re:This move is rational for a public company by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      The little problem with this plan is that in the long run you will create a big mass of people unable to buy the products you manufacture, and without buyers what happens to your company? Consumers are not created from the void, they are the exact same people who work to raise money and so they can afford buying products. With no employees earning well you do not have customers.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    14. Re:This move is rational for a public company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $65k? you can't even live in the bay area on that unless you live 'dorm style' with 2 people per bedroom and 3 or more BR's per house or apartment.

      Well he didn't say where this was. $65k can be rather comfortable for most people in most of the rest of the USA.

    15. Re:This move is rational for a public company by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      [snip] ..if they didn't honor your agreement by paying for your proscribed hours, take them to court for breach of contract.

      That response is pretty combative and runs the risk of earning a black mark against oneself, easily done in the small-ish community that is IT. Not necessarily the best strategy when starting out. May not necessarily be the best strategy even when established.

      When contracting, both the end user and the placement company are one's customers. I know nothing of matters legal in the States but my general sense of caution suggests taking a deep breath and maybe a short walk before giving serious thought to taking one's customers into litigation.

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    16. Re:This move is rational for a public company by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      Corporate raiding in the 80s finished off the last companies that thought about "the long run", now it's all about next quarter.

    17. Re:This move is rational for a public company by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to find a new wife while you're at it ;-)

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    18. Re:This move is rational for a public company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Load of gabage,

      A decade ago I believe the scary posts like yours and wife demanded I quit programming as Indians would have these jobs by now. Worse mistake EVER! I would have been rich if I did not major in business. Going back into IT now but man 10 years of experience gone and starting over the past few years sucked.

      It is 2015 and we were told by 2010 no IT would exist. Well much of it is coming back as demand is rising due to failed outsourcing attemps and management realizing with IE 6 and XP last year they fucked up by being shoe strung budgets that hampered their basic infrastructures for too long. Programmers today are pulling in $65,000 a year WITH 0 EXPERIENCE!

      Stripped straight from the ads Everest or Heald or whatever gives about the exciting jobs awaiting graduates with certificates in computer programming. Sigh.

      The reality of IT hiring is that even without the experience gap and a recent CS degree from a top-tier school, you're at least 10 years too old to get a programming job any place you'd actually want to work. If you're lucky, you'll end up being the "computer guy" at a small business for $15 an hour, cleaning viruses off of 5-year-old PCs and maintaining 20-year-old Excel and Access crap (because in most places, the shoestring budgets for IT are still the norm) until the receptionist's 18-year-old kid spends a weekend moving everything to whatever "the cloud" is in 5 years.

    19. Re:This move is rational for a public company by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I actually kinda feel more concerned for the H1Bs that will be tending to their fires and burning through their lives at both ends.

      Don't. It will simply crash and burn and a new site/platform will be rebuilt from the ground up. They'll justify it via overall cost savings they now have with outsourced IT.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  25. Any wage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "For any wage"? That means if there is a single person in the US who is capable, and you're willing to do 10x there salary it is likely you can get them... I mean imagine if you could find a job had 100 qualified people, but the US needed ~200 of them. You could easily state they were breaking the law, because there was likely a wage that would get the 100 to move. I mean for $100M per year, I'd do nearly any job I'm capable of, because at the end of 2-3 weeks, I could retire and life my current lifestyle. If I could do it for a year or two, I'd have the happiest nephews on earth (no kids, they'd eventually inherit it).

    This logical conclusion implicitly means there should be a price cap, and the question is if the cap is lower than what qualified Americans will accept.

    It seems fairly icky that Disney is doing this (based upon the story as presented), but I'm also a realist and know that nobody is entitled to the specific job they have now.

    1. Re:Any wage? by purnima · · Score: 1

      Yes that's odd. It should be at prevailing wage rates

    2. Re:Any wage? by i+work+on+computers · · Score: 1

      My company hires a lot of H1-B's (typically PhD's from various European countries), and while we pay a good salary, we can't find enough american workers to fill our open positions. If we were willing to pay double or triple the market rate, we could probably entice happily employed candidates to come work for us, but our salary costs are already high, and paying several times market rate would probably drive the company into the ground.

      Your post is anecdotal evidence that H1B visas are depressing market rate. Maybe you should figure out why people won't come work for you at what you consider to be "market" rate.

    3. Re:Any wage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My experience is that most HR departments are dismal at recruiting (I've mostly been involved with those at large universities and research institutions, where there is a fair amount of H1B hiring). Their primary role is to process paperwork (job descriptions, performance reviews, etc) and keep the organization from being sued. When it comes to actually helping managers find talent, they remain paper pushers with little to none of the domain expertise that would make them qualified recruiters. The number of candidates I see that are simply processed through some sort of resume screening AI app is astonishing. This sort of practice is just one example of the pathetic state of recruiting. IMO, there are good candidates out there, but because the recruiting process is so fundamentally flawed, there appears to be a dearth of qualified talent. I'm not saying that H1B's don't serve a purpose, but I have serious reservations that it's primarily because there is a lack of qualified workers. Maybe we need to replace HR departments with H1B holders who can help find workers who don't need H1B's.

    4. Re:Any wage? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      If we were willing to pay double or triple the market rate, we could probably entice happily employed candidates to come work for us,

      I don't think you understand the concept of "market rate". If you have to pay more to get qualified candidates, then that higher rate is the market rate.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:Any wage? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      My company hires a lot of H1-B's (typically PhD's from various European countries), and while we pay a good salary, we can't find enough american workers to fill our open positions. If we were willing to pay double or triple the market rate, we could probably entice happily employed candidates to come work for us, but our salary costs are already high, and paying several times market rate would probably drive the company into the ground.

      Your post is anecdotal evidence that H1B visas are depressing market rate. Maybe you should figure out why people won't come work for you at what you consider to be "market" rate.

      A large part of it is because we're a startup, and though we can match the salary of Google, Facebook, Apple, etc, we don't have the big name, nor the stability that comes from working for one of the big guys. We've got several Executives that are well connected in the industry (and came from Google and Apple), and they have a pretty good idea of what the big companies are paying and we know we're competitive with the salaries.

      We're pretty strong at college recruiting, and have all the interns we can handle as well as recruiting new graduates that are doing research in our field, but we still need more senior people for some roles, and these are hard to find,a lot of them are already locked up at the big companies (Google, Apple, investment banks, etc) and aren't interested in switching jobs.

      H1B fees and legal expenses are not cheap, nor is paying international relocation expenses for a candidate and his/her family, so we're certainly not saving money by hiring H1B's.

    6. Re:Any wage? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      If we were willing to pay double or triple the market rate, we could probably entice happily employed candidates to come work for us,

      I don't think you understand the concept of "market rate". If you have to pay more to get qualified candidates, then that higher rate is the market rate.

      Well that's *a* market rate, but not a fair market rate. If the intention is to use scarcity to drive up wages without bound, then at least my company is large enough that we have a better option -- open up an offshore research center, move half (or even all) of the development team there and do our offshore hiring from there.

    7. Re:Any wage? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      not a fair market rate

      The market has nothing to do with fair! It's supply and demand! Applying moral considerations to pricing would be communism!

      More seriously, what makes 60 hours a week of labour from a nurse less valuable than 40 hours from a CEO? Nothing. To the people they care for, their labour is far more valuable. They'd rather have the nurse, than the CEO, who probably won't change a bedpan and has no sympathy for someone who can't get out of bed on their own. The only thing that differs is the CEO has the ability to control what he is paid.

      We're all part of a vast enterprise that uses the resources of the Earth to sustain the human race. A fair rate would be for us all to get enough to live on comfortably.

    8. Re:Any wage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      . If we were willing to pay double or triple the market rate, we could probably entice happily employed candidates to come work for us, but our salary costs are already high, and paying several times market rate would probably drive the company into the ground.

      So you admit qualified Americans are available, but you don't want to pay them.
      Which is exactly the problem..

    9. Re:Any wage? by Copid · · Score: 1

      H1B fees and legal expenses are not cheap, nor is paying international relocation expenses for a candidate and his/her family, so we're certainly not saving money by hiring H1B's.

      You just described the alternative of paying enough to make your total package competitive as being too expensive. It sounds like you're saving money by that any reasonable definition, even after the government and lawyers take their share. If it wasn't cheaper than raising your pay rates, you wouldn't be doing it.

      That being said, I'm willing to grant that a company that hires PhD level people is much more likely to run into a real hard limit when it comes to finding subject matter experts, and they're the types of operations that the H1B system is supposed to work for on paper. If we did the sensible thing and auctioned off H1B slots and allowed them to be resold on an open market, those are probably the types of companies that would buy them.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  26. The axe comes down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Corporate IT workers are mowed down. CIO and CFO make a bundle of cash by saving short term labor costs.

    It is simple greed at the C level. They do not care about the quality of the final product nor do they care about the hundreds of families impacted.

    This article also fails to mention the rate of depression and suicide in this newly renovated organization. Nor the recent gender crimes or outstanding employee relation issues that ensue from a massive cultural replacement.

    I assume this is the norm, since I have seen it replay at many other locations.

  27. Any wage? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    How can any company have a position which "can only be filled by H-1B workers when no qualified American — at any wage — can be found to fill the position"?

    With a high enough salary, any position can be filled, so unless companies are expected to get into bidding wars and offer multi million dollar salaries to compete for one of the american workers that could fill the position, how can such a policy be enforced? My company hires a lot of H1-B's (typically PhD's from various European countries), and while we pay a good salary, we can't find enough american workers to fill our open positions. If we were willing to pay double or triple the market rate, we could probably entice happily employed candidates to come work for us, but our salary costs are already high, and paying several times market rate would probably drive the company into the ground.

  28. Re:How can this be legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this H-1B shit needs to stop now. Until we're at 99% employment rate for whatever field we're importing workers for, they need to be shipped back to whatever country they came from. This is worse than the illegal imigrant, because these guys are diaplacing current American workers and taking jobs we have people dyeing to fill.

    Every single one of those fired need to get together and file a class action against Disney, and this needs to be posted all over the social sites. Disney is no more a family company than Jack the Ripper was an exceptional lover. This needs to backlash on them, and hard.

    Yep, and I have $1000 for a Congress-critter that says it's perfectly legal and you that should be declared an enemy combatant for resisting the will of our corporate masters. Let's see whose opinion prevails...

  29. Rules for all modern work environments by purnima · · Score: 1

    1. Don't volunteer (make them pay for every bit of effort)
    2. Don't apologise (never admit mistakes in writing)
    3. Don't resign (they have to fire you)
    4. Always maximise outside options and minimise local effort

    1. Re:Rules for all modern work environments by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      "Never explain, never apologize"

    2. Re: Rules for all modern work environments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sad but true. It's really difficult for me to do the bare minimum but that's what I've been learning to do the last couple of years.

  30. I like Ken... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

    Kim Berry, president of the Programmer's Guild, said Congress should protect American workers by mandating that positions can only be filled by H-1B workers when no qualified American â" at any wage â" can be found to fill the position."

    You know.....I really like what Ken has to say. I wish our congress critters would listen to him. After all, they are supposed to be there to help US citizens' needs above all others. *sigh*

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:I like Ken... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      I wish our congress critters would listen to him. After all, they are supposed to be there to help US citizens' needs above all others. *sigh*

      The only US citizens that congress helps are the ones whose last names are "Inc."

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:I like Ken... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you bring up a good point.

      what IS the role of a government? isn't it to promote the well-being or safety of its people?

      are h1b's citizens where they get the same level of protection as those who were born here or got citizenship the long/slow/hard way?

      why do we owe anyone else a job? its often asked 'why do US companies owe US workers jobs?' but I turn it around, why should US companies NOT support their own people, FIRST ??

      find me another country that offers anything close to this h1b bullshit to foreigners coming to their shores to work. name one country - just one - that thinks its own citizens should be 2nd to 'guest workers'. ONLY the US fits that description.

      we start wars with the presumption of keeping americans safe. we collect taxes to pay for infrastructure to benefit those who live here. there are many examples of what countries do for their own people. that's kind of the whole point of 'membership'; by being an american, I should have priority in employment over those who have paid NO dues here and have no vested interest - whatsoever - in the long-term success and stability of our country.

      but my country sold me out. I can go months (or much longer) without getting a job offer and I have decades of useful IT experience. is that right? does that sound like my country is taking care of me? sure doesn't sound like that to me, from where I sit.

      republicans - democrats - none of them lift a finger to help the struggling middle class. as far as I'm concerned, we have nothing but traitors in congress, these days.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:I like Ken... by currently_awake · · Score: 0

      Saudi Arabia and Kuwait both have a huge guest worker system. Simple solution: make a minimum wage for H1B workers of 100,000 dollars per year and automatic citizenship after 4 years employment.

    4. Re:I like Ken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what IS the role of a government? isn't it to promote the well-being or safety of its people?

      Nope.

      The role of a democratic government is to promote the well-being of 51% of the people.

      There's nothing to be gained by doing more. One win elections whether 51% or 75% or 100% are helped and helping 51% is easier than helping 75% or 100% so why bother doing anything else?

      Besides, one needs to exploit the remaining 49% to give the 51% what they want. The more people the government serves, the fewer there are to exploit.

      The game theoretic solution proscribes that a politician serve the interests of as few as possible without falling below 50% and to serve those 50+% exploiting the hell out of the remaining 50%.

    5. Re:I like Ken... by Sarius64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've never met a native in Saudi Arabia or Kuwait that actually worked. They're generally so wealthy they just purchase workers and treat them like chattel. I find it funny that you use countries that generally treat their guest workers like slaves to recommend we give the world citizenship. What does citizenship mean if you continue to be forced out of work by imported workers being treated like slaves?

    6. Re:I like Ken... by dbIII · · Score: 2

      name one country - just one - that thinks its own citizens should be 2nd to 'guest workers'. ONLY the US fits that description.

      Australia has decided to copy the stupid idea.
      That doesn't make it any less stupid though, it just means making influential people happy is seen by those in power as more important than local jobs. For example, we've got a large number of skilled unemployed meat workers that were replaced by unskilled workers from China almost overnight (there was a bait and switch where the meatworks "closed down", everyone was sacked, and then it started with imported staff a couple of weeks later). There's proposals to import the entire workforce for some large mining projects from overseas at the same time that a lot of layoffs have resulted in a lot of unemployed miners. There's plenty of IT examples as well.

    7. Re:I like Ken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better system: no immigration (see Japan, South Korea, some others).

    8. Re: I like Ken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada. What do I win?

    9. Re:I like Ken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "what IS the role of a government? isn't it to promote the well-being or safety of its people?"

      It is to protect the actual individual rights of its citizens. Your well-being is your responsibility. A proper government is only here to ensure that, as you pursue your own best interests, that others do not use force or fraud against you.

      If you look at the rest of your statements even you clearly don't believe that a government should promote the well-being of all its people. Outside of that statement about protecting citizen interests, everything else you say pits the well-being, and even safety, of one group of the nation's people against another. So you really just believe that your group is deserving of protection at the expense of others; and since you expect the government to give you advantage in this way you do mean by force.

      Don't forget: while a number of shareholders of any given business that reap the rewards of expense reduction are wealthy, there are many more that aren't. These are shareholders with 401ks or interests in other retirement plans, people saving and investing for education, or any of a thousand reasons. The property interests of those people (wealthy or not) should be protected as well.

    10. Re:I like Ken... by mridoni · · Score: 2

      I agree, your country should be left to real (i.e. Native) Americans

    11. Re:I like Ken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Singapore, total population of about 5.3 mil, with 3.3 mil citizen AND 1.5 mil of foreigners.

      Of the 3.3 mil citizen, a large number were formally migrants.

      A country where an entire business park is staff by India national.

    12. Re:I like Ken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you use capital letters at the start of sentences? How irritating...

    13. Re:I like Ken... by B-a-Z.nl · · Score: 1

      Eh, the Netherlands gives highly qualified foreign workers a tax break.. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... Do I win a cookie?

    14. Re:I like Ken... by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      find me another country that offers anything close to this h1b bullshit to foreigners coming to their shores to work. name one country - just one - that thinks its own citizens should be 2nd to 'guest workers'.

      Brazil. Here whe have a thing called "terceirização" (outsourcing, more or less). The primary employer pays to a third party who has a group of employees working on demand, where these employees receive as little as possible to maximize profits for the third party employing them. And like the H1B, if the employee complains he is fired with any pratical protections

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    15. Re:I like Ken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either you are an idiot or you have met very few saudis. Even ~20 years ago there were saudis who worked for a living. It was disgraceful and they didn't like to admit it or talk about it, but they existed. And, even back then, the Saudi government had come to realize that using expats for every job was not sustainable. So the practice of dual hiring (hire a native to pair with an expat) was fought. They did this by instituting quotas: you couldn't get a government contract if you didn't have a high enough saudi employee rate. I forget the numbers, but there were (are?) three levels. At the green you could have government contracts, at the other end you were not and in the middle (yellow, IIRC) there was some limitation.

      To this day I still meet with saudis, even though I'm back in the US. Yes, the quota system is gamed. But a system doesn't have to be perfect to provide improvement. Yes, working for a living is still seen as embarrassing. But it is more and more common. Part of the problem there is simply cultural: Americans have (compared to the rest of the world) a disproportionate amount of so-called protestant work ethic. And our corporations abuse this deep seated cultural value. In Saudi Arabia it is rather the opposite and there is a deep seated cultural value in relaxing while someone else does the work. Most Americans call Saudi's lazy as a result. The fact that many would like the same thing doesn't confront them, and the disconnect between cultural and personal values continues to be an issue.

      Now, the Saudi treatment of TCN (third country nationals) as opposed to expats (typically British or American engineers) is nothing less than disgraceful. Nevertheless, you have people from Turkey, Pakistan, India and the Phillippines diligently seeking work there. And illegal immigrants (I met one before he was deported). Because, relative to their own country's economy, the promised wages are very attractive. It reminds me of how the mercenary companies prey on American soldiers who ETS, but I digress. But TCNs are effectively slave labor and as such are confined to work that we moderns expect for slaves (as opposed to historical usage). That is, they do not compete with skilled workers.

      So while your point about being forced out of work by imported slave labor may have some merit, your understanding of Saudi Arabia is seriously flawed and uninformed. TCNs is about as close as you get, and they are not comparable to H1B visa workers as they are for unskilled labor. Where the Saudization program really left its mark is on expats which group is equivalent to H1B.

    16. Re:I like Ken... by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      The seed was planted decades ago when we decided not to publically fund political campaigns and instead left it to private donations. Soooooo, corporations are people, money is speech, speech is unlimited, money is unlimited, congress and Presidents can't be elected without enormous private wealth donating to their elections, so inevitably rich corporations bought the country. Rather cheaply.

      Fix? Eliminate private financing of elections. No PACs. No backdoor corporate campaigns. No money whatsoever necessary to run for office. Free access to the internet for speeches and such, but no cute games with fake personas and perception management. And oh, yes, set the computerized election counting machines on fire, because you ^&%(##s, there is NO WAY they will let the vote go so overwhelmingly against them if they can simply tweak the elections results. Canada manually counts paper ballots in less than four hours. An elections system you cannot understand, own, or deconstruct is a system that is designed to hide cheating.

    17. Re:I like Ken... by macson_g · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but taxes in NL are so high, no-one would come to work there otherwise. And the "30% ruling" only brings the income tax to the level you experience in most other European countries. And it's not only for foreigners. You can be Dutch national, just living abroad for certain number of years.

    18. Re:I like Ken... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Stop being so ignorant.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_nationality_law#Naturalization
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_Korean_nationality_law#Naturalization

      Not saying there aren't any, but I lived in Korea for six years and never met one. The rules you linked to generally require a Korean parent or foster parent, unless you've resided in Korea for a minimum of five years. That would typically eliminate everyone else who wasn't a US service member or guest worker (extremely few).

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    19. Re:I like Ken... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Sure, because 51% of the people will never change their opinion and vote across the aisle because everything is black and white, for me or against me, no middle ground, and not fifty shades of gray.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    20. Re:I like Ken... by blue9steel · · Score: 1

      4 Years is way too long, that would easily be exploited. I say if H1B workers are so awesome that we can't find Americans of equivalent skill then heck, we want them to be citizens. Fast track citizenship for all H1B workers!

    21. Re:I like Ken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada went through an H1B-esque abuse scandal in 2013 where Royal Bank of Canada tossed their IT department out on its ass:

      http://www.thestar.com/business/2013/04/11/rbc_chief_issues_open_letter_apology_to_canadians_over_outsourcing.html

      More recently (2014/2015) there was a huge story over abuses by several big chains:

      http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/news/tim-hortons-foreign-workers/

    22. Re:I like Ken... by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

      I certainly didn't call anyone lazy, I called them wealthy and ready to use their wealth. I've 30 years experience working with them and obviously it's a stereotype, but based in experience. Grow up.

    23. Re:I like Ken... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one native Kuwaiti friend and one native Saudi friend. Both have regular jobs in their countries and both are right in the middle class. In any case, being a native Kuwaiti doesn't even gaurantee you citizenship there. I guess my friend was born lucky but there's about a hundred thousand "bedoons" in Kuwait who are officially stateless because they have Iraqi ancestry. The other two guys I know who were born in and live in Kuwait are not bedoons and also don't have Kuwaiti citizenship but they're also in the middle class.

      I just felt the need to add some more contextual facts to the facts you brought in.

    24. Re:I like Ken... by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      Not disagreeing with you ... just trying to learn what I can from others.

      What IT skills do you have? Are they more like sys admin or development? What stacks? OSS / Microsoft?

      If you had it all to do over again how would you have done it?

      At what point did it go south? Was it all at once or gradually?

  31. Auction off the H1B slots to highest bidder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If foreign workers are really in demand, then employers must be willing to pay for their expertise right? So why not auction off the 80,000 H1B slots to the highest bidder instead of giving them away? Surely each slot is worth $20-50k or more for these expert workers.

    1. Re:Auction off the H1B slots to highest bidder by Ignacio · · Score: 1

      Surely each slot is worth $20-50k or more for these expert workers.

      Per annum. After all, the "maintenance costs" don't just go away...

    2. Re:Auction off the H1B slots to highest bidder by Copid · · Score: 1

      Just make the H1B slot an expiring license (say 5 years). Auction it off at the beginning and allow it to be resold on the open market until it expires. Then you can stop bothering with questions about pay gaps and other nonsense. If there's a $10K per year arbitrage opportunity, the market will quickly sort it out.

      We could use the spot price of visas at different maturities as a "yield curve" to see what the predictions are for future technical labor demand and as an indicator for how tight labor demand is right now. Best of all, the visas will be used on rock stars who are actually worth importing rather than being doled out more or less at random.

      --
      An interesting anagram of "BANACH TARSKI" is "BANACH TARSKI BANACH TARSKI"
  32. Re:What's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    But refusing to backfill their positions and bringing in contractors is A-OK, plus it eliminates long term retirement benefit costs

    All the cool executives are doing it

  33. Re:You reap what you sow. by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    In a way, I hope you're right. Because the companies that buck the trend will be around in 10 years, and every other one will be on its way to bankruptcy. I take great satisfaction in seeing heartless, stupid, mindless dipshits fail and take large companies with them.

  34. CFO and CIO greed and failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The c level team will take home a fat bonus. Hundreds of local Orlando families are affected. The software products will fall over due to lack of care more so than anything else.

    The real magic of Disney it was that the cast members loved their work. They were proud of the product. iger hired a new cfo who found someone recently ousted from American Express who could do it better. The oops moment will not be as bad as when Eisner fired all the imagineers. Who by the way went on to build islands of adventure.

    However it will be very difficult to find and build a new culture of it people who care at all. The new leadership has caused massive depression and at least one suicide in the team Disney parking lot. This is layered on top of the employee relation issues with the rampant sexism and cultural favoritism.

    What's next for cfo and Cio? A great new job and a pay raise doing the same thing at the next place. Never mind that they were ousted from Amex and Disney.

    1. Re:CFO and CIO greed and failure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet they are homophobes and don't care about global warming either.

  35. Re:be a basketball by davester666 · · Score: 0

    Wow. You must really like Mike Tyson. He does have a great tattoo on his face.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  36. Re:You reap what you sow. by trparky · · Score: 2

    I eventually see this entire system collapsing within the next ten years and not just IT (Information Technology) but the whole economy. How can the economy continue if you have nobody working and earning anything? That's right, it can't. And when that happens the entire system is going to simply collapse. Like I said before, I give the system another ten years (if we're lucky) or five years (if we're not lucky) and then... poof, gone. Total and complete world wide economic collapse that will make the Great Depression of the 1920s and 1930s look like a historical footnote in comparison. Anyone with half a brain can see the writing on the wall.

  37. no english heard? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    quoting this wonderful gem:

    Several of these workers, in interviews, said they didn't want to appear as xenophobic, but couldn't help but to observe, as one did, that "there were times when I didn't hear English spoken" in the hallways. As the layoff date neared, "I really felt like a foreigner in that building," the worker said.

    I'll go ahead and name names: I used to work at cisco. I have said many times that I could walk down the hallway at any random cisco san jose building and for most of the day, not hear a single word spoken in english (in hallways or breakrooms).

    is this what we want to see IN AN AMERICAN COMPANY??

    I don't dislike indians. I like the culture, love the food, think people from india are fine and decent, overall. but why should it be 'normal' to walk down the hallway of a san jose, california company and not hear english for hours and hours at a time?

    I should have had a gopro cam or something on me and taped what a typical day was like, there (when I still worked there; they canned my ass not too long ago). I would then send a copy to the congresscritters who think that there are not ENOUGH foreign workers in the US. maybe they want me to go a full week between hearing english in an american company?

    if I go thru an interview and hear 'not a cultural match' one more time, I swear to zeus I'm going to go postal. I'm nearly at the end of my rope, here....

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:no english heard? by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 1
      "Not a match for culture" is a generic bullshit excuse they give because they don't want to give a reason. They have no business reason to give you a reason not to hire you and plenty of legal reasons to not give you a reason (you might sue them claiming that they denied you employment for an illegal reason).

      I once gave a five-hour interview to a small American company where the entire team was English-speaking Americans and received a one sentence rejection from them telling me that I didn't fit their culture. Never again! If a company wants more than a few hours of my time for an interview, they have to pay for it!

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    2. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Awww. Murrican doesn't like the much vaunted Murrican competition. I bet you're wishing you went leftarded earlier. And yes, recurring to the government to protect you from someone who is just competing with a lower salary is leftarded.

      Try to realize that while it's bad for you, it's good for the immigrant. Your boat sinks a little, theirs floats up a lot. Be more humane, for crying out loud.

    3. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Times change. Cultures Change. People don't always integrate. If it wasn't so, you would be speaking Navajo or Cherokee...

    4. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you feel that you have to stress the fact that you are not xenophonic then perhaps you are in denial about your true feelings towards immigrants. I for one quite enjoy hearing (and speaking) different languages around the office and I would much rather have more international colleagues because they provide for a richer working environment in my opinion.

    5. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in a UK-owned company in central London (UK). I'm actually quite proud when I hear two people talking Spanish, Russian, Polish or whatever to each other in the kitchen or in the halls. It reminds me that we live in a very inclusive society where you're valued for who you are, not where an accident of birth happened to put you.

      We have a perception of an immigration problem here in the UK. Hell, there's a party running for government that opposes it. However, as someone said of some new-media company here in London... you can have branch offices all over the world to run your customer care, but London's the only place in the world you can have all of them under one roof.

      I have sympathy for your position, but it seems to me that American society is deeply self-absorbed and actually quite arrogant. In some parts of the UK (like London) we seem to have got past that sort of thinking (which we definitely used to have, and still have in some other areas of the UK), and have realised that diversity is actually a strength not a weakness. Once that happens, you'll possibly be the diversity that a company needs, rather than different from the mono-culture they have.

    6. Re:no english heard? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Love the food. The culture, not so much. A culture which promotes obedience and subservience, particularly of women, is not one for me.

    7. Re:no english heard? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 2

      "Not a match for culture" from a group that has a similar cultural background to yourself is code for "We think you're an asshole."

    8. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      if I go thru an interview and hear 'not a cultural match' one more time, I swear to zeus I'm going to go postal. I'm nearly at the end of my rope, here....

      You sure that's not code for, "you're too old," or, "you've got too much experience and would want a decent wage?" I've gotten that plenty (being over the dreaded 40). One interviewer told me they only hire recent grads because they have lower expectations. Another asked when I graduated high school. I have a fucking Master's degree, seriously?!

    9. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why should it be 'normal' to walk down the hallway of a san jose, california company and not hear english for hours and hours at a time?

      Hmmm. Really? Why shouldn't it be normal to hear Spanish? How about Ukranian? Maybe

      they canned my ass

      because you seem kinda like a self-centered elitist that nobody wants to work with?

    10. Re:no english heard? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Both of those remarks are utterly illegal and you could have had their job or their money if you sued them.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    11. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Would you question why you can go through so many cheeses in your market and not see any ameican cheese? Or goods in general in regular store in India and see so many American iPads and Xboxes?

      Your country fights very hard for open markets and capitalistic freedom. The migration of employees is just one part of it.
      I bet you buy the Chinese products anyway since they're cheaper than the American made ones.

      It's so funny to see you guys up in arms about this when Indians have been fighting to survive and sell their goods in a market with foreign goods.

      Globalization, Deal with it.

    12. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The public won't do anything to fix it until they all lose their privilege too.

    13. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how do you prove it? How do you prosecute it with a dwindling savings account, no witnesses, and no incriminating paper trail? I could record every single interview (single party state) and file suit, but that would likely to get me blackballed by every employer that reads the newspaper or hears about it.

    14. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh... Just consider yourself blessed for being shitcanned from the place. While it might be difficult to find work, you're probably better off out of that benighted, caustic place. I know I see myself that way. There's a mindset problem that comes with that culture you claim to love. I don't mind it- it has...issues...especially in an engineering context.

    15. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case, they don't have a similar cultural background. That's where the problem begins. (By the way, you're not a match for this culture... >;-D)

    16. Re:no english heard? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Asking when you graduated from high school is almost certainly not to establish that you have a high school diploma, but to establish your age. Most people graduate at the age of seventeen or eighteen, while the date you finished your Master's program doesn't give them anywhere near the same accuracy.

      In other words, they're practicing age discrimination, without giving you enough evidence to file a complaint that has any chance of going anywhere.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    17. Re:no english heard? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      You only get something if you win. It's hard to win, as most companies won't outright admit to illegal hiring behavior.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    18. Re:no english heard? by Loopy · · Score: 1

      I'll go ahead and name names: I used to work at cisco. I have said many times that I could walk down the hallway at any random cisco san jose building and for most of the day, not hear a single word spoken in english (in hallways or breakrooms). ...
      if I go thru an interview and hear 'not a cultural match' one more time, I swear to zeus I'm going to go postal. I'm nearly at the end of my rope, here....

      "Not a match for culture" from a group that has a similar cultural background to yourself is code for "We think you're an asshole."

      Reading comprehension not your strong suit? Just sayin'...

    19. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Not a match for culture" from a group that has a similar cultural background to yourself is code for "We think you're an asshole."

      No it's code for everybody here speaks hindi and they work for a quarter of what you would work for because they don't have a big house with four cars in the driveway and a swimming pool in the back (Aka. the American dream).

    20. Re:no english heard? by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      And yet we are all told we must "embrace diversity"...

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    21. Re:no english heard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Xenophobia is a DUTY. It is the logical outworking of the desire to preserve one's society.

  38. Re:be a basketball by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I pity the fool who doesn't drink his Gatorade.

  39. Awful summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Disney decided to outsource their IT. This has been going on in industry for what, a couple decades? That the IT company didn't take on the Disney employees and used a lot of H1-Bs from India is bad enough w/o the sensational Disney's-directly-hiring-H1-B-replacements-for-their-staff implication of the crappy cut and paste summary.

  40. How many months ? by randalware · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many months until they have a massive data loss ?

    Can anyone say stock option meltdown ?

    Sony Sony Sony !

    --
    This is my opinion based on what little I know and understand of the rumors and lies Thanks, Randal
  41. Under the sea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The seaweed is always greener
    in somebody else's lake
    You dream about going up there
    But that is a big mistake
    Just look at the world around you
    Right here on the IT floor
    Such wonderful things surround you
    What more is you lookin' for?

    An H1B!
    An H1B!

    Darling it's better
    Job under the weather
    Taken by an H1B!

    Up on the shore they work all day
    Out in the sun they slave away
    While we devotin'
    Full time to floatin'
    Your job to an H1B!

  42. Um... by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    Companies have been working for years to eliminate essential personnel. You find complex tasks and break them down into simpler and simpler tasks. If they were paying middle class wages this wouldn't be feasible. But at slave wages it works perfectly. If you're not doing incredible complex math that requires near genius level intellect that only a few genetic freaks have then your job can be broken down into processes and then your livelihood replaced.

    And after 30 years of declining wages who the hell can save anything? 60% of Americans are paycheck to paycheck. And before you trot out that nonsense about buying iPhones every 2 years my generation doesn't smoke. That more than makes up for the cost of a phone every few years. So shove off.

    Maybe companies _shouldn't_ be able to drop me anytime. You know, there's a downside to my desperation for you too. That's what unemployment is for. It's not to protect me if I'm unemployed. It's to protect _you_ from competing with me when I'm desperate and I'll take _anything_. See, when that happens they'll fire you with your benefits and your high salary and hire me for minimum wage. The unemployed are coming for you. Welcome to the race to the bottom. It's a long way down.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  43. Somebody can do it cheaper? Fire that costly CEO! by fredc97 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    H1B visas rules should first apply to CEOs then downward to that organization. No company really needs an expensive CEO, they cost a lot and no large company has ever closed when their CEO died in a car crash, so they are expendable. Get a new CEO at a fraction of the cost and benefits, that's even better shareholder value.

  44. What me worry? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    What's good for Disney is good for America. Or at any rate, good for the Americans who matter.

    I recently read that Southern California Edison replaced its whole 500-strong IT staff with H1Bs. However, details are scarce. Several US senators have called for an investigation, but the feds are refusing on the grounds that no one hurt by it filed a complaint.

    The US economy is screwed anyway. The H1B saga is just one more issue in the decades-long trend of converting the economy into shareholders and people who flip burgers for shareholders. Once the rich have skimmed all the cream, they'll go find another country to screw - or at least one that actually makes stuff they can buy with their winnings.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  45. I'd love to see the program killed by rsilvergun · · Score: 1, Interesting

    There's already several programs for the genius of the world to immigrate if they want to so H1-B was never necessary. But how will you get popular support? There's just too many issues that divide the American Workforce. No one votes with their wallets. Whether it's Guns, Gay Marriage, Abortion, Drug Legalization, whatever. There's always something to split the electorate. And with our winner take all 2 party system that means all anyone has to do is get a majority of the vote. Add in Gerrymandering and it's basically a done deal.

    To get rid of this crap Americans would have to give up on every other issue they think matters and vote on money and only money. I just don't see that happening. If we could switch to a parliamentary system, but that pretty much means scraping our Constitution; and to hear Americans talk about that damnable piece of scrap paper you'd think it was their bible. To be fair I remember as a kid having it droned into me that it was a sacred document. Every teacher I've ever had sung it's praise. When I was older I found out why we have a Senate (hint: it our version of the House of Lords) and why we had so much States rights. It wasn't for Freedom's sake, that's for sure...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I'd love to see the program killed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Support Senator Jeff Sessions who believes the same.

    2. Re:I'd love to see the program killed by GLMDesigns · · Score: 1

      So what is states rights for except as a check and balance on the federal government. Take a look at the constitution and see what powers were given to congress and see if, perhaps, just perhaps, they've overstepped their reach.

      --
      If you're scared of your govt then you need to further restrict its powers
      Vote 3rd Party in 2016 and beyond
  46. Re:What's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to staple the non-compete agreement to the NDA during the exit interroga-I mean interview.

  47. Good for them! by the_Bionic_lemming · · Score: 1

    Every American job they fire - is one less American's family income for Disney.

    (that includes DVD's and theater and toys and well pretty much anything, but I'm sure the lower payed H1B's will pick up the slack and make more profit!!!)

    --
    _ _ _ Go for the eyes Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
  48. Racists On Parade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://readwrite.com/2015/04/29/apple-watch-tattoos-ink-skin-color

    Ha ha Timmy Cook is such a snook.

    Ha ha

    1. Re:Racists On Parade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Timmy Cook is GAY !

      And Rasist ! HaHaHaHaHaHaHaHa

      That will be a good Tomb Stone Epitaph !

      Snicker Snicker

    2. Re:Racists On Parade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're wearing it wrong.

  49. An alternate solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right now it's next to impossible for an immigrant to obtain citizenship in a reasonable time frame. If we start giving citizenship to immigrants (at least high-skilled immigrants) after a few years on the job instead of after an eternity, employers' leverage disappears entirely. Poof, problem gone.

  50. Re:You reap what you sow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole system won't collapse unless it's replaced politically (unlikely, so buckle up). Capital will dominate, as people will continue buying cheaper and cheaper shit from Walmart at lower and lower prices (thanks to zero marginal costs). And the markets will reward these companies with higher valuations. Fact is, labor is diminishing in power as it becomes globally fluid and increasingly displaced by automation - US workers are not immune.

    As for those evil executives - they're doing their jobs, and collecting performance bonuses (often >10x+ the average IT income) as a reward. If that CxO decides to become a martyr, there are 100 others waiting for that fat payday - this will not impact the macroeconomic trend.

    Public companies, investors, and capital are doing what they do in the most efficient way. Expect more of these stories. One day it will be yours.

  51. Disneyland by tquasar · · Score: 1

    Disneyland was a great place years ago, my family visited there many times. Now it seems more like Wally World. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  52. Kill the entire H1B program by currently_awake · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The H1B program is making the problem worse. The corporations have the choice of training an American or hiring a fully trained foreigner. Once they hire the H1B worker they won't also do the training, and no American is going to spend lots of money in self training for a job that's filled: so no American will ever arrise to take that job. Hiring an H1B worker makes that temporary skill shortage permanent.

    1. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose Disney could just offshore its tech requirements. Then they wouldn't have to hire expensive Americans or play the H1B game.

    2. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Shakrai · · Score: 0

      The H1B program is making the problem worse.

      Really? This site seems to have a liberal/progressive bent on most social issues, does that not carry over to immigration? Oh, I forgot, THEY TOOK UR JUBS!!!!

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree the H1B program should be terminated with prejudice. It is one thing if someone legitimately wants to make America his or her home and moves here with the intention of contributing. That I can understand and accept, even if I don't like the jobs being taken, but this H1B crap must end. It is a festering pile of evil from what I can tell and a company that deliberately replaces American workers with H1B's should face the corporate death sentence. They broken the law, and not just in a minor way, but in a way that is exactly the opposite of serving the public good. At minimum all of the people from the top and down who voted on that decision should be forced to leave the company, with perhaps some help to either restructure whats left or sell it off, while those principally involved should see a jail cell for breaking the law.

      This nonsense where corporate crimes result in what are only minor fines needs to end. If a corporation is a person made up of people, then the portion of that person that composes the adult decision making center needs to face the same jail time as any other smuck for crimes, particularly since the scale of the crimes can be so vast.

    4. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being anti-H-1B is progressive. Progressives generally believe that corporate abuse of workers is bad, and H-1Bs represent the ultimate pathway to worker abuse, by creating a class of people who cannot afford to demand equal pay (because if their employer terminates them, they have to leave the U.S.), who have a harder time moving from company to company (or at least who perceive themselves to have a harder time, which in practice is basically the same thing), and who therefore will end up working for substandard wages by local standards.

      And then those H-1B workers end up depending on government subsidies, low-income housing, etc. because the cost of living in high-tech areas is based on typical salaries, not H-1B salaries. In effect, everyone else in the area pays to support these people, solely because their employers were too cheap to pay them properly.

      Progressives tend to take a dim view of turning our country into a caste system. Just saying.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re: Kill the entire H1B program by eclectro · · Score: 1

      I don't have a problem with offshoring. They just need to pay taxes like others do. Instead of thinking that congress will give them a tax free holiday someday so they can scoot their hoard back over here for free.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    6. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H1B program is making the problem worse.

      Really? This site seems to have a liberal/progressive bent on most social issues, does that not carry over to immigration? Oh, I forgot, THEY TOOK UR JUBS!!!!

      Its funny when I joined for the first time the site was centrist technocratic . But over the years the left has colonized it using their usual technique of being so batshit insane and intolerant that nobody with a functioning brain would want to be near them.

    7. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H1B program is making the problem worse. The corporations have the choice of training an American or hiring a fully trained foreigner..

      No Indian with whom I have worked has ever been fully trained prior to arrival. They are like cockroaches; cockroaches serve a useful role in nature but when they invade your home they become pests.

    8. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by mjwx · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The H1B program is making the problem worse. The corporations have the choice of training an American or hiring a fully trained foreigner.

      The problem with that statement is that the foreigner is not going to be fully trained.

      The kinds of places that you get H-1B workers (457 visas in Australia) from are the kind of places that have trouble with the word no. So it's an exercise for the listener to determine if "yes" means "yes I do" or "yes I don't".

      However once they have the contract, that doesn't matter (to the off-shore provider).

      Any Indian who is fully qualified is making plans to get a proper job in the US, Europe, Canada or Australia (well maybe not Australia any more) and not trying to work for an off-shoring consultancy. These people know that they can get the same as an American or European worker and have no desire to be abused by cheapskates.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    9. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by LordWabbit2 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, they are just waiting for the green card or indefinite leave to remain etc. Then they are out the door. What I love is management who think that a warm ass in a seat is all that is required to do the job. Same as the management who think throwing more people at a project that is behind schedule will fix things. Software development is not the same as digging a friggin ditch!

      --
      There are three kinds of falsehood: the first is a 'fib,' the second is a downright lie, and the third is statistics.
    10. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by zeddgara · · Score: 0

      C'mon it's mean to deny those poor Mexicans scaling fences and traipsing across rape ambush deserts so they have the honor of doing your drywall and picking your onions but when another group actually comes here legally and given a job it's all hey no that's corporate abuse! Do you guys even listen to your own words?

    11. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by hidflect · · Score: 1

      Is that you Apoo? Get back to your coding, dammit!

    12. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by RabidReindeer · · Score: 1

      The H1B program is making the problem worse. The corporations have the choice of training an American or hiring a fully trained foreigner. Once they hire the H1B worker they won't also do the training, and no American is going to spend lots of money in self training for a job that's filled: so no American will ever arrise to take that job. Hiring an H1B worker makes that temporary skill shortage permanent.

      "fully trained" foreigner.

      ROTFL

    13. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...turning our country into a caste system....

      Turning? From what, may I ask?

    14. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Progressives tend to take a dim view of turning our country into a caste system. Just saying.

      While simultaneously supporting policies that turn our country into a caste system. Something like 80% of the "Obama recovery" has went to the top 10%.

      It's mind-boggling to me that anybody would use the word "Progressive" in any manner other than derogatory, anyway, given what the Progressives stood for 100 years ago.

    15. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA - they are taking fully trained, experienced US workers and replacing them with H1-B that needs to be trained by the American.
      It is money and control. The short term stock price goes up because the wage cost goes down without showing a head count cut.
      Profit$.

    16. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by robbyb20 · · Score: 1

      Honestly, ive always felt this site leaned more to the right when it comes to politics. That could be because I lean to the left...so maybe its dead center?

    17. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      We had to train the Indians who took our jobs managing TSA and IRS security systems before we were moved to new contracts.

      I paid money out of my own pocket to get training on Veritas vxvm in order to be placed on a specific contract (one I wanted). Granted, it wasn't training for a job that was already filled.

      I do self study for other things such as learning about Red Hat 7 although I suspect the company would pay for me to go to the class if I asked.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    18. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Sounds like we have a consentus. Too bad it's about 15 years too late, but let's clean up the fragments of what we had and try to move on without the semi-slave labor.

    19. Re: Kill the entire H1B program by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Since when are leftists openly xenophobic and nativist? America for Americans? WTF? Have we always been at war with Eurasia?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    20. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      As a self proclaimed moderate conservative, I'm generally anti-H1B, and for the record, Fuck Disney for doing this. I haven't lost my job to anyone. I'm also not anti-immigration, just in favor of everyone following the legal process. So, maybe we could stop throwing all of the left and all of the right in just two buckets. There are multiple issues, and multiple points of view.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    21. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      +1 Racist

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    22. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The H1B program is making the problem worse.

      Really? This site seems to have a liberal/progressive bent on most social issues, does that not carry over to immigration? Oh, I forgot, THEY TOOK UR JUBS!!!!

      Its funny when I joined for the first time the site was centrist technocratic . But over the years the left has colonized it using their usual technique of being so batshit insane and intolerant that nobody with a functioning brain would want to be near them.

      And yet here you are, still posting.

    23. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's mind-boggling to me that anybody would use the word "Progressive" in any manner other than derogatory, anyway, given what the Progressives stood for 100 years ago.

      It's part of conservative's culture war. I think I've heard it called "The War on Language". They redefine terms to that it is hard to even debate what they are saying. According to this article conservative think tanks are behind it. It's sad, because false debate only makes things worse.

    24. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typical of Progressives, they talk out both sides of their mouths...just look at Apple relative to Indiana and many of the rich Islamic countries.

    25. Re: Kill the entire H1B program by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      There's nothing xenophobic about wanting to stop the H-1B program from being a way to cut costs. If you truly need to bring in talent from overseas because you can't get it in the U.S., that's one thing, but if you are firing American workers and bringing in foreign workers to do the same job at a lower cost, that's quite another. It is abusing the system, and unfortunately, the H-1B system was practically designed to make such abuse easy.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    26. Re: Kill the entire H1B program by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I guess the point that I was trying to make is why is the H-1B program any different than agriculture, taxi driving, or any other position that's stereotypically filled by immigrants? You can tout out the, "They're just doing the jobs that Americans don't want to do." line if you wish but it rings hollow with me.

      The hostility here towards H-1B feels hypocritical to me. You're either in favor of the free movement of people, goods, and labor, or you're not. You can't cheer on immigration so long as they're limited to grunt work.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    27. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Actually, anti-H1B is progressive. The problem here is that the progressive moment in government has turned fascist. The Republican party is no better in this regard, they just have a different set of economic interests.

      My prediction, the first candidate that's publicly Anti-H1B will get a huge amount of attention by the public; more so if there's a more libertarian bent. Effectively, both the Tea Party and Coffee Party are conservative and progressive offshoots, but both lean libertarian. This is where the grassroots of America is heading; libertarian with American interests first.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    28. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by doconnor · · Score: 1

      Obama is really only moderately progressive.

      If there had been a Republican president it would have been 100-110% of a smaller recovery.

    29. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Livius · · Score: 1

      It's left-wing by US standards, which is lunatic-fringe right-wing for the rest of the planet.

    30. Re: Kill the entire H1B program by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      The H-1B program is different because H-1B workers who leave their jobs are also legally required to leave the country. This makes them captive labor, almost to the same extent that illegal immigrants are. IMO, we should make green cards easier to obtain and kill the H-1B program outright. By ensuring that foreign workers have similar employment mobility to native workers, it would reduce the ability of unscrupulous companies to bring in workers from overseas and pay them wages that are below the regional going rate. (They would still be able to do it, but they wouldn't be able to retain those employees, so they would eventually be forced to pay wages that are competitive within their geographical area.)

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    31. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by MooseMiester · · Score: 1

      While simultaneously supporting policies that...

      Saying on thing - loudly, and with great flourish of righteous indignation - and doing the exact opposite - is the definition of the modern progressive. The real illness in society is how many people are so easily duped into believing the nonsense, as history tells us these are people who end up being enslaved.

      I fully support the ideals of the progressives, 100%. But the current crop of so called "progressives" are anything but.

      --
      Murphy was an optimist
    32. Re:Kill the entire H1B program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Violence works. If it looks like a Desi, point and shoot.

  53. Re:What's the problem by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    The CEO in question is using a government program, so he isn't the only player here.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  54. Lesson 1 by dbIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lesson 1 - try not to work in a place where they use fucking stupid euphemisms for employees such as "cast members".
    It's a bit of a clue that either employees are not valued as long term staff or that somewhere there is a total idiot drafting policies insisting on what employees with be called.
    "But it's showbusiness!" someone may exclaim - but no that does not fit because camera operators etc are not "cast members" - which means this is some weird shit for appearance sake and other arbitrary shit is bound to happen.

    1. Re:Lesson 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right; I wouldn't work for them, and I don't buy their products, watch their stupid movies, or go to their lame ass amusement parks. No one here should if all of us are serious about this issue.

  55. Nothing guaranteed you weak saps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You think you'd be able to keep your job long enough to retire? Wow what entitlement you have my dear. Now go re-train or get another degree in something else and get a new job and never stop trying.. your brass ring is out there somewhere. Now just remember to not draw a picture of Mickey Mouse while you are job-hunting because some things do last forever, when you have enough money to buy laws. WE are entitled to make money forever. YOU are not.

  56. Re:What's the problem by Sarius64 · · Score: 1

    Who happen to be H1B visas working for temp agencies.

  57. Re:VOTE BARAK 2016 by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    at least with the ACA you can get a non group Health Care plan with pre existing conditions.

  58. Re:You reap what you sow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I eventually see this entire system collapsing within the next ten years and not just IT (Information Technology) but the whole economy.

    Entire economic collapse is always ten years away. See you next decade when you'll be repeating the same bullshit again.

  59. But by jfern · · Score: 1

    Aren't they supposed to pretend that they couldn't find a qualified American? Or has the program been changed, so that no pretending that you searched long and hard for someone with 75 years of C++14 experience?

    1. Re:But by KingOfGondor · · Score: 1

      It's a myth that an H1B visa requires proof of the absence of an equivalent US citizen who can do the job. The visa has no such constraint; it never had such a constraint. Green cards (permanent residency) do require such proof; only a subset of H1B workers are sponsored for green cards by their employers. The H1B visa was always targeted at foreigners who had no particular urge to immigrate to the US, but rather wanted US work experience on their resume, which would help them get cushy gigs back in the home country after they returned. In practice, it's evolved into being one of the channels for immigration, but companies only sponsor their most valuable employees for green cards; "Valuable" does not have to mean "best and brightest".

  60. H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dear friends

    I'm posting as an anonymous for obvious reasons, but wanted to share some inside view on this subject. To qualify my comments, I lived in South America working for North American and European based companies as a consultant, being paid USD 90.00/hour (so 14.4K/month == 172K/year). I credit my involvement with Opensource as the main reason to be well paid even though not leaving in USA at time.

    I always admired USA and still believe this is a good country, even though is no longer the best country to live when compared to some countries in Europe (e.g. Germany, France, Finland).

    About 2 years ago I decided to migrate to USA, mostly to provide my child the opportunity to learn how to speak good and proper English (with American accent). My starting pay was 200K/year, so, not within the stereotype of cheap labor and local job stealer that is so common here in Slashdot.

    The H1B visa was the only way to move to USA. Calling to kill the program will just push away talented people that might otherwise being working and paying taxes in USA. That being said, I feel disgusted to know that several companies exploit the program to get cheap labor and I believe this must be stopped.

    One common misconception is to believe that you can always find local people to do the job. Well, boys... that might be true for trivial jobs (like IT support), but is exactly the opposite for elite jobs (e.g. linux kernel, WebKit/Blink, Gstreamer, etc).

    For those elite jobs, most of the people is already taken (e.g. Apple, Google). And the remaining people is scattered around the world, being just a few who are willing to move to USA.

    Another common misconception is to think you can 'just train' the locals to do it. Nopes... it takes several years to make an elite programmer that is a maintainer in one of those aforementioned Opensource projects.

    Maybe you are considering that instead of going through the H1B, I should have applied for a GreenCard (GC)? Well, I have a close friend, PhD and one of the top 20 experts in his domain area that was living in Australia and applied for a GC... that was 3 years ago and only now he will be able to move to USA.

    To close my message, I would like to tell that it may be the minority, but there are indeed some really good engineers/programmers that depend on the H1B program to move to USA and later apply for a GC if planning to stay longer, which, to be quite honest, I'm a bit unsure if it is worthwhile considering that:

    a) Your wife won't be able to work;
    b) You pay taxes and social security in a European level and get South American level services in return;
    c) Life in USA is quite expensive;
    d) This country is becoming less and less democratic by the day.

    Cheers

    AnonymousCoward

    1. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely those "talented" people are desperately needed in their OWN countries? Or is it fair to strip mine all of the most intelligent people from other countries, and have them all live in the USA? Then what?

    2. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you describe is the proper use of the H-1B program, and you're completely right that it would be misguided to shut it down altogether. However, a huge chunk of the available H-1B visas go to "IT consultancies" that specialize in outsourcing and offshoring and abuse the program to bring in workers who don't have that kind of specialized knowledge.

    3. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      sorry, but I have to call BS on the 'its mostly about the elite programmers'. it SHOULD be about the specialty fields or where exceptional experience is needed and some researcher from a foreign country is the only expert who can do this job, that's fine.

      what I have seen (been living in the bay area 25 years; born in the US and lived here all my life; and, yes, I have travelled outside the US) is that the jobs that are being filled by h1b's (at cisco, for example, where I -used- to work) are ordinary common jobs. I have met some very sharp folks who where h1b but also lots of very inexperienced, shabby programmers who created more work as clean-up after them than they added during their stay.

      I mostly apply for 'regular old' programming jobs, these days. I consider myself average or a bit above, but certainly not genius level. I'm capable and I can usually get the job done or at least escalate if I'm stuck. but even for the common jobs, I'm being pushed aside in preference for the h1b. I see it at interviews. I see it when I am working, the ability level and experience level of those around me. we can all see it, its not hard. and we all know that its not the high-end programmer that we mostly import. its the common guy, and I have to tell you, lots of us 'common guys' are out of work and companies simply won't hire us because we are not as abusable as foreigners. plain and simple, cut and dried for you.

      I understand you have needs and your family is important to you. but why should my country spend more time and energy supporting YOU instead of ME? I don't expect YOUR country to support me or take care of me. I don't expect country A or B or C to support me. I DO expect my own damned country to prefer its own people be working here, getting the rewards of their life-long investment in the place and helping to make the next generation of americans even better off than their parents.

      that brings up another sore point. am I better off than my parents generation? I'm mid 50's and I still don't own my own house. I make (or made, when I was still working) a nice figure in the $100-$200k range. but in the bay area, its really hard to afford to buy a house if you didn't have help, and with employers throwing you under the bus every other year, no bank wants to loan money to a 'contractor' who has 'uncertain employment'. therefore, I'm a renter and may never have the chance to buy my own home. my parents grew up in the WW2 era and they made a fraction (translated) of what I make/made. but they owned their own home, could afford to have kids and treat them well, they didn't worry about 'will I be working again next year' like I do, pretty much all the time, now. they had a retirement and pension and overall they had many things I will never have.

      I'm worse off than my parents' generation, overall. and its not looking like its going to improve any time soon.

      so WHY should I - and people like me - just hand over my country to visitors? again, would your home country willingly accept me? my country is accepting you. where do *I* go?

      you have to understand the feelings of those who invested their whole lives here, only to be told 'sorry, social contract is now off.'

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    4. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes for every one of you there are 9999 cheap IT replacements. If you think it is worth it to keep H1B around at cost of 10k american jobs in addition to one that is actually being used in the spirit of the program then that is your opinion. I feel the damage being done swings the scales much in the opposite direction, and that long-term negative effects are not even yet fully realized. But even if the abuse was at a ratio on 100 to 1 or 10 to 1 that would still be a price too high to pay.

    5. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      c) Life in USA is quite expensive;

      Where? The US is a massive country. Are you talking only about California?

      d) This country is becoming less and less democratic by the day.

      Please provide evidence.

    6. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sensible people aren't calling for an end to the H1-B program. They want it to return to it's original stated intent - allowing access to people like you (so you say), at a maximum. There are no studies on the subject, obviously, but due to known information about which companies apply for the H1-B's, that would mean cutting the number available by at least 75%. It's set up to be easily abused. You might say hey, you're throwing the baby out with bathwater. I'm sorry, but that's what we're doing *right fucking now*.

      Get these Americans back to work.

    7. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by rch7 · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are E1 and E2 immigrant visas for your case. I.e.:
      E1 1: Persons with extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics. Applicants in this category must have extensive documentation showing sustained national or international acclaim and recognition in their fields of expertise.
      E1 2: Outstanding professors and researchers with at least three years experience in teaching or research, who are recognized internationally.
      E2 1: Professionals holding an advanced degree (beyond a baccalaureate degree), or a baccalaureate degree and at least five years progressive experience in the profession.
      E2 2: Persons with exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business. Exceptional ability means having a degree of expertise significantly above that ordinarily encountered in the sciences, arts, or business.

      If you or your employer can't meet E1/E2 requirements, sorry, maybe there is nothing so special about your skills.
      H1B or L temporary worker visas are fraud and abuse most of the time, that can't be controlled and should end completely. They destroy any incentive for US persons to pursue career in IT or in STEM in general.

    8. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Local people get local wages. If you weren't tied down to a geographic location and you get an offer 10x what you are currently making overseas, wouldn't you take it?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    9. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey thanks for your work on Ubuntu. You have to understand something here. No one is mad at the workers. We love bringing talented people to the country and people like you are who we want to come under the H1-B program, that's what the intent of the program is for. The problem is that the vast majority of companies using this are using it *only* as a way to lower costs. You don't replace entire departments/IT orgs that already have employees performing the required tasks with lower paid H1-B employees because there isn't someone available. It's specifically a bottom line decision meant to displace costs for the company onto the American taxpayer. It's corporate welfare, which vastly dwarfs individual welfare, and acts as class warfare against anyone not in the top 10% of the US wealth. It does nothing but funnel money from the poor to the wealthy and it will end in bloodshed of the rich if it's not stopped. Poor people only take being poor for so long.

    10. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you're someone who could qualify directly for distinguished engineer status at, say, Google, then you can forget about E1. You have to be internationally widely recognized as a world expert and have independent important people in your field write letters praising you, i.e. you would need to be a household name in the engineering community. If you think that this should be the standard, then you're delusional, because there's a shortage of people already on the market way below that standard. For the E2 we start getting into realistic territory for talent that's already very difficult to hire, but processing will typically take at least a year (if you're lucky and your application doesn't get selected for auditing by the computer, otherwise it takes a minimum of 6 months more). If you happen to be from China or India, an E2 takes 5+ years.

      How many exceptionally talented people do you know that are willing to apply for a job and wait at least a year before they can begin? How do you think they can handle their current job during that waiting period? It's often unethical not to tell your current employer that you've already decided to leave. Many top tech companies even force you to sign documents where you promise to tell your current employer the second you've accepted their offer (which is a requirement before they start doing any paperwork for immigration), since they don't want to get sued by your previous company who could claim that you've stolen their trade secrets.

      The solution would be to either significantly raise the standards required for the H-1B close to E2 standards while making it very quick to process. Alternatively, make the E2 much faster to process, so that it's a realistic way of being able to get key people in from abroad without having wait forever.

      The reality is that many companies need people that you just can't hire in the US. For example, assume that a startup bases their product on some open source library and they would like to hire the person who wrote the library. What if this person is, say, German? If it's a small library, then neither E1 or E2 will apply, but it might be critically important for the company. In this case it will be impossible for this US based company to hire someone with a similar level of expertise within the US. The reality is that the guy who wrote it is the expert on it.

      The problem is of course that current immigration laws allows you to import people that lack any important specific skill that you can't find within the US, even though this specific skill might not make you famous. For those that do have some critical skills, especially in IT, it's too damn slow to hire anyone from abroad.

    11. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Major+Blud · · Score: 1

      "(e.g. Germany, France, Finland)."

      So how is this situation handled in the countries you mentioned? Do they have an H1-B/Green Card equivalent for non-Europeans?

      --
      If you post as Anonymous Coward, don't expect a reply.
    12. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      FWIW, I, an American, was just hired by an American staffingcompany that as far as I can tell, seems to be run and populated by Indians. Nicest people you'd ever want to meet, if you can understand what they're saying. Personally I've never had a problem with the Indian people. The only thing is the accent barrier.

    13. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so WHY should I - and people like me - just hand over my country to visitors? again, would your home country willingly accept me? my country is accepting you. where do *I* go?

      The same thing is happening all around the western world. You may not like the answer, but it is very simple: it is a redistribution of wealth. Life in the US/Europe is better (used to be better) because we were living off the sweat of other people. Buying cheap stuff from slaves in poor countries. These slaves are now educating themselves, and "threatening" your well-paid job in the US. Why not? You were just randomly born where you were. Why would you be more entitled to "the good life" in the US than some Indian, if, apparently, this Indian is prepared to work harder for it? Even if this pushes the wages down, for him it is still an upgrade, apparently.

    14. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by KingOfGondor · · Score: 1

      Immigrant visas have a per-origin country quota that cannot exceed a threshold (I believe no one country can get more than 7% immigrant visas in one year). For most countries, this is all right; a qualified person applying for an immigrant visa can get it in 2-3 years. Though from an employment perspective, this is not ideal; will an employer really be willing to wait 2-3 years for a new hire to join, however skilled that person is? And will this prospective hire be willing to trust the vagaries of the INS/USCIS and assume that they will get an immigrant visa? But this is not really the main problem. The vast number of prospective hires happen to be from India and China; high populations, their countries have been focusing on STEM education, etc. I believe these two countries combined produce well more than 50% of the STEM graduates (and that includes those who obtained Masters and PhDs from US universities) who interview with, and are hired by, US companies (on the basis of merit.) Yet, the immigrant visa (green card) quotas, which are handled independent of the non-immigrant visas by the USCIS, are very few for people from these countries. Add to that the family reunification program that gives priority for immigrant visas to the family members of immigrants, and the result is that an Indian or Chinese PhD from MIT will have to wait for a decade to get a green card, even though that person may be outstanding and reputed. At least this is true for the E2 category; even E1 visas take a few years, is my understanding, for people from these countries. Also Mexico and Philippines, but for different, non-STEM, reasons.

    15. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a Finn currently seeing if I got my H-1B in the lottery, since I'm getting my Ph.D. in a few weeks from a top US school. Finland has no quotas for immigration, but for anyone outside the EU, you need to prove that you can't find a qualified Finn. This is fairly annoying and since Finland currently has lots of gaming companies that need people with very specific talents there has been a lot of complaints from industry. However, it takes less than 6 months to process this. The only problem is that it's pretty random. There's not really any law that dictates what the requirements are, you just need to convince the particular person reading the application. There's also an appeals process.

      It seems like the next Finnish government might get rid of the requirement to prove that you can't find a qualified Finn. The parties that are likely to form it seems to want to abolish it. I'm not sure how this will be implemented in practice. I guess what they're assuming is that it's far easier for Finnish companies to interview locally, so they won't go fishing abroad until there's a real need. They will probably have to stipulate some wage limits, so that it won't turn into a way to export cheap Indians. On the other hand, if you get a degree from a Finnish university, you can stay to work. Finnish universities don't actually demand any tuition, so your degree gets funded by the Finnish taxpayer no matter where you come from.

      The main reason why I'm applying for a job in the US instead of Europe is that I got an offer from Google and it's a lot more practical to not go to Zurich, since my wife would have to learn German to have reasonable chances of getting a job. It's purely a language/convenience issue, although I'm expecting to go back once we have kids that need to be put into school. I would really hope that the EU could work out some reciprocity agreement with work visas, since the differences in the standards of living aren't that big that people would flock like crazy.

    16. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make 200k a year and are complaining about things being expensive? What a little bitch you are. Go back to the mudhole you crawled out of.

    17. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by rch7 · · Score: 1

      If you look at Visa Bulletin for May 2015, all countries are "current" for First Preference Employment immigrant visas. There is no extra extra waiting time for them, other than usual processing, that takes many months. China and India do have few years waiting time for Second Preference, but that is how it is supposed to be, it is second preference. There are maybe 4 times as much people in India alone than in the US. You can't move them all to the US or US would become another India. The visa limits serve purpose.

      "will an employer really be willing to wait 2-3 years for a new hire to join, however skilled that person is" - there are "O-1 Workers of Extraordinary Ability" temporary work visas. Processing time may be few months, the same or less than H1B. Status can be adjusted to immigrant later in the US. And no, employers are not supposed to bring any workers from around the world to new country, take profit, and than dump them to the society to take care of them. It is reasonable to make exceptions for people with extraordinary ability but it would be destructive to the country to do more than that.

      Yes, immigrant visa processing is very slow and embarrassing. If you think it is easier in most other countries, you are mistaken.

    18. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      Complete fabrication

      Is another reason people post anon....

    19. Re:H1B-er here: my opinion on the subject. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't get me wrong, I do not approve of the H1-B program, but not because I think we shouldn't have immigrant workers.

      I just feel that those immigrant workers should not be indentured to their employer, it gives the employer far too much power over those workers. As an employer, why wouldn't you hire the person that you can have deported just by laying them off; the odds of them doing anything to stick up for themselves is basically nil.

      That is the problem of the H1-B, not the workers it brings, but the power it gives the employers over many of their employees, and thus over the rest, because they could be replaced with people that can't argue.

  61. Reddit is one step ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reddit is even one step further down the path, with their new "no negotiation" policy for hires. All their offers are take-it-or-leave-it, supposedly because allowing negotiation is sexist. However, what this also means is that they are going to get a lot more "leave it" responses, if the initial offer is not good enough - because it really means the new way to negotiate is to say "no, that's too low, but I might reapply if I thought there was a better offer available". Then they can turn around and say "look, we tried to hire domestic workers, but they turned us down - we need more H1Bs"

  62. Opportunity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Evil Mad Scientist, "That Sony hack was kinda exciting, but how am I ever going to get my minions into a position of trust at the Disney offices?"
    Minion: "Hey boss, there's a job opening in IT"
    EMS: "PROFIT!"

  63. Hay Igor, Eat Goofy Scat by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

    Aren't you supposed to build a pyramid?

  64. Force companies to pay a fee to hire H1B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Companies should be forced to pay a hefty fee, like $50,000 per H1B employee hired, or perhaps 50% of the annual salary. If it is really about these companies not being able to find qualified candidates, then they should be willing to pay this fee.

  65. Re:What's the problem by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    Doesnt the public have the right to demand the business owner hire only countrymen? That door swings both ways.

    --
    Good-bye
  66. loyalty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should this nation ask our loyalty when it shows our citizens none?

  67. At any wage by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    American workers by mandating that positions can only be filled by H-1B workers when no qualified American — at any wage — can be found to fill the position.

    I don't think that a job exists that some American would not be willing to take for $1 billion dollars.

    The following jobs where it would be easy to find *some* American willing to do for $1 billion:

    1. Be raped to death (with he proceeds going to their family).

    2. Kill their whole family (with the proceeds going to themselves).

    3. Being the 2nd or 3rd person in a human centipede.

    4. Being eaten to death by Hannibal Lecter.

    5. Being fed to themselves to death by Hannibal Lecter.

  68. Har-lo de! Meeki mai naime... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dear human race, please stop wasting your money on Disney and their parks, movies, etc, etc, etc. Poor Walt, must be turning in his grave over what his namesake company has become...

  69. Not blaming the employee by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    For point (A), they story made it sound like they were replaced overnight. I'm just wondering how that happens for any IT job... there's always some knowledge transfer that needs to be done.

    For point (B), I'm saying that you cannot trust the company period. Some are saying what Disney did may well be illegal - doesn't matter to the people who were fired, because they need something to live on now. Never assume a company will follow the law, or cares about you whatsoever. In some cases they might, mind you, it's just that you should never assume that.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  70. Re: You reap what you sow. by trparky · · Score: 1

    How will you be able to buy anything at Walmart if you don't have any cash to buy said products? That's the situation that we are very much looking at coming within the next 5 to 10 years.

  71. H-1B system is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It really annoys me that you can get an H-1B for a job that requires you to be able to write a "Hello World" program or to be a junior sysadmin. However, the US needs some "quick" visa for highly skilled people instead of just offering green cards. The green card application process takes more than a year and no one with actual skills will sit on their ass waiting for a year, especially when you can't apply for a green card from a US student visa without first leaving the country and doing the waiting abroad. They will go somewhere else instead. My proposal would be the following:

    1. Reduce the quota to maybe 10000 visas instead of 85000

    2. Instead of a lottery for visas in early April rank applicants based on their salaries and pick the top 10k. Maybe do it at the beginning of each month with a montly quota of 1000 visas with any leftovers transferred to the next month.

    3. Drop the lottery system completely for funded PhDs (restricted to universities belonging to some of the university groups with very strict standards)

    (1) would make it impossible to use the visa for pulling down salaries and none of the consultancies could get cheap workers. (2) would guarantee, together with a fast processing time, that the visa would be very fast to get. Highly skilled people don't want to wait and the salary requirements to fit the quota is already a very good filter, so the USCIS don't need to do filtering themselves. The market is much better at evaluating who has skills through what they're willing to pay.

    I'm a PhD graduate from one of the top 5 schools in the world in my field. I know there are less than 10 people in the world that know anything about my area, since my team essentially started it. Top tech companies where interested in it and wanted to hire me. I would like to stay in the US, but I will just return to Europe if I need to fight this visa mess.

  72. It's time to fight back by rossz · · Score: 1

    I'm starting to think the only way to stop these companies from wholesale firing so they can replace everyone with cheap H1-B workers is to make them targets for massive cyber attacks. Not that I can do that. It's not my skillset. But if it ever does happen, I'm going to sit back with a big bag of popcorn and laugh my ass off.

    --
    -- Will program for bandwidth
    1. Re:It's time to fight back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't laugh too much, cause NSA is gonna drag your ass off while you are still eating that popcorn..

    2. Re:It's time to fight back by djsmiley · · Score: 1

      Because the current IT guru's are making sure that doesn't happen, right?

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  73. You were sleeping when Bluecolor got Bejinged.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The IT folks were sleeeeeeeping when .. when Blue-color got Bejinged - to enrich YOUR share-values . Now the IT-color is going to the world .. to enrich your CEOs pay....

    Moral: If you remain silent or uncaring when genocide happens to your neighbor blue-species, the next is you white-color species.

    Make amends, end WTO :). US should stop demanding world to openup-its-market, and choose to shut importing H1B, and cheap Chinese goods that break often and creates lot of garbage/pollution both in China , the world over, the oceans and deep-sea.

  74. US dosn't love China/India .. LOVES Captialists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > >why do we owe anyone else a job? its often asked 'why do US companies owe US workers jobs?' but I turn it around, why should US companies NOT support their own people, FIRST ??

    Oh puleeez, US does not bestow others job because US loves them. US as it calls itself proudly "Captalistic economy" .. where the rich ought to become richer. For that YOUR US govt worked tirelssly for the past 3-4 decades ...

    1. US created WTO so it can export with less restrictions
      - The US people were happy .. more forex, more local jobs.
    - The developing world lost lot of its small industry, farmers lost, farmer suicides, subsistance lost, pollution, more disease
    - IT nerd (You) kept quiet because either you chose not to educate yourself, also your greed stopped you from seeing others pain.

    2. US capitalists (heros) CEO's Beijinged production to China
    - The US middle class only saw "wow cheap Plasma TV at my home", the middle class ignored the innovation/jobloss.
    - The blucolor guys lost jobs, many small towns vanished, more pollution in China. The blue color did not know how to rant in /.
    - The IT nerd(you) did not rant about "blue loosing job" in ./ because you were not affected.

    3. US capitalists (heros) CEO's Bangalored IT jobs to India and elsewhere.
    - Oh ouch ... my fingure is burnt. waaaaaa ....

    Do some justice for other countries (by not twisting other countries through WTO and other tricks - make trade "equitable" rather than MY COUNTRY should gain all wealth)... and the karma will turn around for you too.

  75. No customers left by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do companys like Disney think that their customers all work at McDonalds? Keep laying off highly-paid employees and you can kiss your customer base goodbye.

  76. I agree. by tlambert · · Score: 4, Informative

    I agree.

    If you follow the second order links down to what Disney actually did, they outsourced their IT to a contracting agency.

    When they did this, they laid off 125 full time employees in the process, and between three of the contracting agencies providing the services to replace them, there were apparent;y 65 H1-B applications in the last 3 years. Presumably, not all 65 went to Disney, because the contracting agencies contract services out to companies other than Disney. In fact, a vast number of dark data center porn and shopping sites are located in that area of the country, down by Los Angeles, where the majority of that kind of content is produced.

    What this story is actually about, is complaining that the full time workers were replaced with contractors, some of whom were probably in the U.S. working for the contracting agencies on either H1 or L1 visas.

    The summary is a gross misrepresentation of the facts here, and going with a contracting agency is a valid mechanism for ensuring "Just In Time" capability, without over-employing in order to handle upsurges in workloads. It's how janitorial and security services are handled (when you have a large company event, you have the contracted agencies put on more security people for the event itself, and added janitorial people post-event to clean up afterward.

    That said, the usual route a decent company will follow when out-sourcing to a local agency, as opposed to off-shoring the work entirely, is to require that the contracting agency hire a certain percentage of the workers that are being laid off to replace them with contractors. This has the effect of ensuring continuity of service, providing a built-in mentoring capability to the contracting agency for the processes and procedures being contracted out, and in general providing continuity of employment for at least some of their existing staff.

    It falls under the category of "Not Being Dickish About Switching Over To Contractors".

    But the idea that they should not be switching over to contractors at all, for something like IT services, which are generally modular, replicable, and have uniformly applicable skill sets, if what you are spending your time doing is pulling wires, spinning up VMs, installing system software on replacement desktop/laptop machines, and so on, is patently absurd. These are "cog jobs", where any sufficiently skilled cog can replace any other sufficiently skilled cog in the machine, and you probably won't lose a marching step over the replacement.

    That, and surge scalability, make them rather ideal for out-sourcing.

    Frankly, I'm surprised companies like RackSpace are renting out their IT people, rather than forcing everyone to live on RackSpace racks; it's a pretty ideal scenario for them, in terms of profit per employee, and gives them buffer for their own internal surge scalability issues. They get borrowable capacity, and other people pay to maintain that capacity at a certain level.

    Add the fact that a lot of deployment is on OpenStack with standard deployment tools, no matter if you're working on your cloud or working on someone else's cloud: all the tools are the same, so all the skills are pretty much transferrable.

    This is kind of what happens when you sufficiently commoditize an industry through standardization.

    1. Re:I agree. by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The real problem here is that IT is regarded as something like a janitorial service, rather than an integral business function. That's a recipe for a slow burn into the ground. There is plenty of cog work to be done, sure. But if you don't use IT to actually change how you do business, you're not doing IT.

      I'm not surprised then that Disney is only making money by buying IP, and riding old IP. They're organizationally prohibited of producing something new.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    2. Re:I agree. by phorm · · Score: 1

      With that, there comes statements like this
      "He trained his replacement"

      IF you're hiring contractors from a respectable/knowledgeable company, why the F*** would you need to train them. This is what happens when they bring in a company that is *cheap* to clean out existing staff.

      I didn't see any note in the article as to what company was supplying the H1-B workers. I wouldn't be surprised if it's a shell created specifically for/by Disney.

    3. Re:I agree. by tlambert · · Score: 1

      The real problem here is that IT is regarded as something like a janitorial service, rather than an integral business function.

      You presume that Disney had only 125 total IT staff in the first place, and laid all of them off. From my reading of things, they laid off only the janitorial service type IT people, and kept the rest of them in house.

    4. Re:I agree. by KingOfGondor · · Score: 1

      I've been reading about these kinds of incidents for years, and always come off wondering what "training" refers to? Surely, it does not refer to the teaching of programming concepts, architectural design concepts, or even teaching the new guy the ins-and-outs of a new (or proprietary) programming language. I would think "training" is the equivalent of pointing out: "here are the light switches", "there's the toilet", "here's our control room", and more relevant to IT "this is the access control system we use". You know, simple stuff that get the new people familiar with the environment they are stepping into, and without which knowledge they will be poking in the dark for weeks, wasting their (and everybody else's) time. Anything beyond basic familiarization ought to be the responsibility of the new hires; if the hires can't manage it on their own even after that, someone made a mistake in hiring, and the new people won't last long. Much of this discussion about H1Bs is very emotional, and quickly takes a nationalistic turn. No one bothers to understand the issues, or try to empathize with all parties involved.

    5. Re:I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the idea that they should not be switching over to contractors at all, for something like IT services, which are generally modular, replicable, and have uniformly applicable skill sets, if what you are spending your time doing is pulling wires, spinning up VMs, installing system software on replacement desktop/laptop machines, and so on, is patently absurd. These are "cog jobs", where any sufficiently skilled cog can replace any other sufficiently skilled cog in the machine, and you probably won't lose a marching step over the replacement.

      You are living in an interesting fantasy world. There's a lot of that going around, particularly among executive types that don't understand the real world. Too many people in executive ranks are sociopaths who get ahead by selling the illusion that they can save the company money, without actually caring that their solutions in reality end up wasting lots of money. This causes a lot of executive level decisions to be really bad (something that is well documented in the industrial psychology literature - it won't be hard for you to find material to read on this topic by firing up your search engine skills). The contract IT decision is simply yet another example of the same kind of seemingly endless screw ups that executives have been making for as long as psychologists have been studying management.

      Good IT requires long term knowledge of the systems one is maintaining. While individual tools and processes may occasionally be simple, the interactions are -- in general -- not simple. Don't mistake the one for the other, the illusion for the reality. Most of the cookie-cutter tasks can be scripted, so there's no real benefit in hiring a legion of idiots from a contract company to handle these tasks.

      Good IT also requires being proactive about preventing problems, which in turn requires deep knowledge and good intelligence and observational skills, and strong problem solving skills. It also requires strong research skills, good interpersonal skills, a high level of discipline, and a long term commitment to the employer.

      Contract workers will not in general provide the skill and ability needed to handle these tasks, let alone have the long term commitment to do things well. Hiring a battalion of idiots does not make up for the lack of a much smaller number of intelligent, motivated, and skilled people (of course, an employer that isn't smart enough to treat their people well isn't going to have anybody like this, which seems to be the primary reason certain sociopathic billionaires are pushing H1Bs, a particularly obtuse bit of stupidity on their part).

      Even the contract workers that can do complex IT jobs quickly and well seldom perform at this level. They learn from their bosses (more sociopaths) not to exercise initiative, since this costs the contracting company potential future revenue in additional contracts that go beyond the base service contract. As the saying goes among con men, never give a sucker an even break.

      Those of us that are long term employees NOT in IT find that we end up having to do a lot of the IT jobs, because the contract IT people don't have the ability to do their jobs, or evade doing them in an attempt to get a more expensive contract. Having to spend time doing somebody else's job means that the products that depend on us doing our "official" job end up either being late or costing more money or having fewer features, or any combination of the three! It should be clear that this is a huge loss for the business, and the policies that lead to IT outsourcing have a huge negative effect on the communities and markets in which the business operates.

      Unfortunately, having the ability to take responsibility for one's actions doesn't seem to be a requirement for holding an executive position in many businesses. Decision making at the executive level often is more a matter of salesmanship, and manipulating the appearance of reality, than in actually understanding reality enough t

    6. Re:I agree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good IT also requires being proactive about preventing problems, which in turn requires deep knowledge and good intelligence and observational skills, and strong problem solving skills. It also requires strong research skills, good interpersonal skills, a high level of discipline, and a long term commitment to the employer.

      Contract workers will not in general provide the skill and ability needed to handle these tasks, let alone have the long term commitment to do things well. Hiring a battalion of idiots does not make up for the lack of a much smaller number of intelligent, motivated, and skilled people (of course, an employer that isn't smart enough to treat their people well isn't going to have anybody like this, which seems to be the primary reason certain sociopathic billionaires are pushing H1Bs, a particularly obtuse bit of stupidity on their part).

      Even the contract workers that can do complex IT jobs quickly and well seldom perform at this level. They learn from their bosses (more sociopaths) not to exercise initiative, since this costs the contracting company potential future revenue in additional contracts that go beyond the base service contract.

      It should be clear to all involved that, from a tort perspective, the replacement of competent, motivated long term employees by contractors is certainly negligence, and creates liability for any impact this decision has on customers, including failures due to employees being distracted by IT problems or failures directly involving IT equipment.

  77. Re:VOTE BARAK 2016 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Naw man, fuck your ACA. The Obamacare Tax is great, bro! You pay $95 in tax and you don't get shit for it! It's fucking awesome!!!

  78. The other half of the coin by Valiant+Codemonkey · · Score: 1

    A lot of folks are advocating for the gov't to step in and save the American IT force. Don't hold your breath. If US companies were unable to import cheap labor, they would have to save that money some other way. It's not like they're just going to reach into their pockets and give out more money. They will appeal to the government to lower their tax or regulation burdens. The gov't won't budge here. The gov't burdens are forcing companies to cut costs in ways which the gov't allows, and H1-B is that vector. It's a deliberate loophole to keep private companies content with the existing burdens, and will not be closed, because it would rock the boat in these other regards.

  79. pure tax play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The H1B visa can lead to the individual being stateless from an income tax perspective and therefore no tax needs to be paid.

  80. Berkeley Breathed's commentary on sleazy companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Berkeley Breathed had a quite few comic-stips commenting on profit-centric company managers, I quite like this one about how the "wildly overpaid, criminally incompetent, board-coddled, company-wrecking American CEO" will be "punished by the system", "disciplined without mercy" and "spanked"...

    And since the topic is Disney..

  81. my solution to the H1B visa problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    disclaimer: I'm European so I might be missing the ball completely

    But for every H1B visa a company has it has to make a yearly donation of X (let's say X >= 10.000$ as a minimum) to a state funded school/university.

    Companies complain about finding skilled labor: well they can get cheap labor from abroad but at the same time also fund an education program to solve this.
    So a decade or less later they should be able to find skilled workers.

    This is how my college IT department was partly funded.
    A bank chain with a nearby operational office needed a regular fresh supply of COBOL programmers, so they sponsored my college in exchange for COBOL being in the curriculum. Every year about 150 students graduated so they always had a fresh pool to hire from.

  82. Hillary by hidflect · · Score: 1

    Madame Clinton proactively sought donations from Tata and Infosys eventually garnering $3Million from them. If you want your last 2 weeks to be spent training your replacement then be sure to vote for the Pantsuit Puppet.

  83. contraception by tommeke100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That and the access to affordable contraception.

  84. Replaced in 1 day, are you so important? by djsmiley · · Score: 1

    If you can be replaced overnight, I wonder how much work you were doing...

    --
    - http://www.milkme.co.uk
  85. Solution by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    Companies that replace American workers with H1-B Visa workers should be taxed at a MUCH higher rate and have any and all tax abatements eliminated.

  86. If this is true it is time to boycott Disney! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've had it. My employer is outsourcing too. It no longer pays to be the best at what you do ! If you want to get even more angry search for the stock of whatever company to see what the top shareholders earn. If your take 3% of the earnings across the board it's more than enough to cover the salaries of the IT staff getting displaced. These are not desktop support jobs either. These are senior system engineer and infrastructure engineer jobs... not desktop support. Jobs that pay 75k/year - 150k /year. What these companies are doing are polarizing the United States even further. It's not only about Black vs. White.. I believe if this action continues there will be a revolution. I am tired of the response I get from politicians. Our government is either misinformed or they are in on destroying the middle class too. What can you do to stop it ? Stop outsourcing. Payroll is the cost of doing business. Employ the best and brightest you can find and your company will do well. Outsource just to stretch the truth to your investors by outsourcing and now your payroll is an expenditure that you can amortize over seven years ? Just to make investors think your payroll is less ? That's not right. If you have been affected by outsourcing doing your career it's time to speak up. It's time for us to get organized. It's time for us to do something about it. First we need to educate America so citizens can boycott companies like Hasbro and Disney. There's many more and when my days are over at my place of employment I will release my company name. Outsourcing is about green so we need to hit them in the pocketbooks. I am all for making a buck but if it comes to selling your fellow citizen out to make a buck it is wrong. My parents didn't raise me like that. It's a shame that people have to be so greedy. Sure make a profit but there's a cost to earning that profit. Employ the best people and share the wealth with your staff. The wealth will trickle down through the economy and the economy will do well. No wonder the economy hasn't fully bounced back. P.S. The outsourced staff.. they usually earn a small percentage of what an American Technologist earns. The difference goes to the outsource firm and the cost is actually more than to hire a direct hire employee. The savings is the payroll now becoming an expenditure. We need to make this a felony. So don't take your kid to a Disney Movie.. wait until it's on Netflix or Amazon so you can watch it for almost free. If your tired of earning an extremely low interest rate on your savings account, invest in a safe at your home and store your money there. At least you won't owe taxes on it anymore. While you are at it get your license to carry because it think it's really going to hit the fan pretty soon.

  87. Rare by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    The company I work for has only ever hired one H-1B worker, because he was literally the only qualified candidate. That's one worker over a ten year period.

    The H-1B program is useful, but I don't see why it needs to be expanded.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  88. Re:You reap what you sow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same here. Corporate greed is going to bring the entire system down. Where I work outsourcing is rearing it's ugly head. When I look up the stock and see the top shareholder earnings it makes me angry. What the earning tell me is the executives have no clue at the cost of doing business. By outsourcing they are actually lying to shareholders. When a company outsources, payroll becomes an expenditure. An expenditure can be written off over seven years. Payroll appears to be 1/7th of what it truly is. This should not be legal. When outsourcing where I work is complete I plan on making a lot of noise about this. I've contacted the SEC and voiced my opinion. Right now we need to use the internet to organize. Start a campaign against outsourcing. Maybe we need to form a political party because Democrats suck, Republicans suck, The tea party has ruined their reputation and are viewed as zealot quacks, the green party just appears they want to get high and have same sex with each other. I was looking at the Constitution party but they are wacked too. With everything that is going on in the World we need a strong military. You need to be strong to keep the peace. It's Human nature. If you let your gaurd down you are in trouble. I think we need to look at risk. Strong military and if you have a business and outsource your staff, you are taking a risk and putting the country at risk.. pure and simple. Maybe we need a military figure as President that's not going to take any more shit. No more bailing out other countries period. Worldwide we are not liked because we stick our nose in everyone's business. It's time for us to fortify our borders, kick the illegals out, kick the h1b visas out. make it a crime if an executive earns more than 4x the top salary in the comapany. Greed will break Capitalism. It will ultimately end up with a Civil War. I don't like it when I wish the executives driving the outsource move where I work to just drop dead of a incurable disease. Then all the money in the world couldn't help them. I don't like it. I worry about my kids' future.

  89. So I emailed the CEO.. by Stu101 · · Score: 1

    I just suggest everyone does the same and tells them what theyI am writing to you as a potential visitor to your resorts and occasional consumer of your media to complain in the most intense terms possible about your companies attitude towards its IT staff in general, and specifically those employed within these resorts.

    If recent reports are to be believed (http://www.computerworld.com/article/2915904/it-outsourcing/fury-rises-at-disney-over-use-of-foreign-workers.html) , you have just replaced one hundred and fifty hardworking staff with offshore labour that is cheaper.

    The reasons given, unfortunartly don't jel with any reasonable person who believes in a healthy economy. Workers should be paid their proper worth and be allowed to bring up their families without the threat of an offshore person taking that job.

    It is not even as though Disney is doing badly in terms of income and needs to cut costs. The only people that benefit from this action is mostly corporate share holders and the one percent of the population, including board members such as yourself. If you truly believe in a strong proud America, you should be looking to keep those good workers and give them something to be proud of.

    I fully expect that such a plea falls on deaf ears, but I will be doing what I can to ensure that Disney recieves no income from me. My wife and I were planning to go to Disneyland this year. However in light of your shortsighted attitude to US workers I will take my dollars elsewhere. I will also try my hardest to make sure people know how Disney treats their employees.

    Yours sincerely think of Disney.

    --
    http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.
    1. Re:So I emailed the CEO.. by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      I don't get it ... I get to select the cheapest food (which in terms pays certain employees lower than they might expect at another restaurant) when I go out to eat.

      Why should the 1% have different rules applied to them. Wasn't that the reason the French Revolution happened? The aristocrats got different rules applied to them?

  90. Time to launch a Boycott! by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 1

    I was going to take my three sons to see the new Marvel Comics Move "Avengers: Age of Ultron".. forget about it now. I urge you all to do the same. use the internet , get the word out. There is only one way to deal with greedy bastards.. make them go broke. After they go broke they will take care of the rest.

  91. Boycott by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is the most effective way to deal with this. To heck with Disney; I will spend my money elsewhere

  92. Why do they do this? by jjhues7676 · · Score: 1

    My thought as to why they are changing from outsourcing to bringing them here is that now the wealthy assholes don't have to go to third world countries!

  93. Re:Somebody can do it cheaper? Fire that costly CE by trout007 · · Score: 1

    I can't wait until Disney has a Sony like insider breach and Star Wars is leaked before it is released.

    --
    I love Jesus, except for his foreign policy.
  94. When we hired an H1-B from a neighboring country.. by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    Our lawyer told us we needed to show that there were no qualified US Citizens available to do the job.
    We were doing our hiring via usenet (this was a while ago ;). To provide formal documentation, we took out a 30-day ad in a trade journal cited that, and stated that there were no responses (there weren't; I think trade journal job ads are pro forma for this purpose anyhow). Also the lawyer told us we had to state the wages were consistent with what we were paying similarly qualified US Citizens doing the same job.

    In our case it didn't matter; these requirements were just facts. But I'm curious why Disney doesn't seem bound by those same rules.
    Have the rules changed?
    Was our lawyer incorrect--Is H1-B meant to displace qualified US workers with cheaper foreign workers?

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  95. Most companies I know that do this... by Bonzoli · · Score: 1

    Most companies I know that have done this, do not understand they are taking a 5 year road trip to mediocrity and fail. It takes about 5 years of breaking the cycle to fully understand what they just did to themselves. I'm sure some "MBA know it all", just got a huge bonus check and doesn't care because he is either retiring or moving on. Or possibly he is retiring and moving on in 5 years and just doesn't know it yet. Most companies bring in a consulting firm to help explain how best to accomplish this who also make a huge amount of money.

  96. Re:What's the problem by turp182 · · Score: 1

    No. That would be "vote with your wallet".

    But, in the case of public companies, the shareholders could do this. But it would hurt the share prices.

    And for private companies "vote with your wallet" is the only viable approach (and by viable I mean there is no approach actually).

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  97. FU Disney by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    As if I needed one more reason not to go to their hell-hole parks.

    I got dragged to their parks a few years back to make the wife and kids happy. It was a miserable time, but my kids loved it.

    No more. I won't give Disney another dime of my money. I'm going to vote with my wallet on this one. No more Disney toys, lunchboxes, clothing, movies...etc.

    F these guys. Let them build parks in India for all I care.

  98. Time to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Time to replace Disney movies with Bollywood counterparts.

  99. Re:What's the problem by tburkhol · · Score: 1

    The problem is that H1-B's aren't really hired. They are temporary workers to whom the company need feel no long-term obligation. They are temporary residents to whom the government need feel no long-term obligation. Bring a few of them in, let them work for a bit, then send them off when the project is done: perfect workforce flexibility.

    The H1b program, like unemployment insurance, is a good idea but is subject to abuse. Fraud in unemployment benefits individuals, and we have all manner of documentation, regulation, and verification to minimize that abuse. Fraud in H1b benefits corporations, and we basically trust them to do the right thing.

  100. Anyone surprised? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone surprised by this? It isn't like this is the first, or last, time this has happened. I will never understand how anyone can claim that H1B is good for US workers. I certainly don't understand how our government can claim there is a need for more foreign tech workers. I am one of many many thousands of unemployed tech workers. I have a nice little programming degree that is worthless. My degree and $7.50 will get me a cup of coffee at Starbucks.

  101. Re:What's the problem by Atrox666 · · Score: 1

    ..and the Libertarian position is that the problem is that the company just can't pay you pennies on the dollar and are forced to import labour because of it.

  102. Re:be a basketball by freak0fnature · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure he meant Micheal Jordan

  103. One more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disney is just one more idiot company that thinks that experience is worthless. I'm pretty sure that these new IT dudes are in over their heads in shit at this time since they need to understand the infrastructure, the cost of this must be astronomical and i doubt that they are doing any real economy.

  104. OK. That's it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm boycotting Star Wars VII ... well, no. But, I'm very upset!

  105. IT workers could fix situation, but won't by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Management: "train your replacement, or you do not get any severance."
    IT worker: "guess I have no choice"

    vs:

    Management: "train your replacement, or you do not get any severance."
    Entire IT staff: "you try to pull that bullshit, and we all walk out"
    Management: "okay IT workers, you win"

    1. Re:IT workers could fix situation, but won't by neminem · · Score: 1

      I feel like most companies that would pull that to begin with, would go more like this:
      Management: "train your replacement, or you do not get any severance."
      Entire IT staff: "you try to pull that bullshit, and we all walk out"
      Management: "fine then, you're all fired, we'll just hire your replacements and not train them, we don't give a crap."

  106. Senseless to single out Disney by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Microsoft hires far more H1Bs. As does IBM, Apple, etc.

    The entire situation needs to be fixed. Singling out one company is pointless.

    Start by donating to NumbersUSA. I do.

    1. Re:Senseless to single out Disney by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Microsoft didn't fire its entire IT department. Disney did. They are a stark example of fuck-you-ism and the lie behind the H1B expansion, the fabrication that they can't find qualified workers so they need indentured labor from abroad. Here they are saying, we just don't want to pay local rates, so fuck you, America!.

    2. Re:Senseless to single out Disney by Moof123 · · Score: 1

      Singling out a single company provides a rallying cry.

      I will violate Godwin's law for a second, and point to Anne Frank. Did she matter if the grand scheme of things? Not really, she was just one person. But by putting one little girl's face on Nazi horrors you can send a more powerful message than listing big round numbers of dead victims.

      Disney does a good job maintaining their all American family friendly facade, and showing a little of their behind the scenes rapacious capitalism may be sufficiently jarring to cause action. I see them as a very good poster child to beat up on given their high profits, high prices, and desire for a family friendly public persona.

  107. American indeed by null+etc. · · Score: 1

    Thank god the group is called "Partnership for a New American Economy". I'd hate to think they were sponsoring anything un-American, which obviously they could only do if they were being duplicitous about the name of the group. Politically-minded folk wouldn't do that, would they?

  108. Shoot I'm already boycotting Avengers/SW7-9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shoot, I'm already boycotting Avengers and the new Star War movies. Not much left to boycott.

    Back on topic, there will no longer be any long time IT workers at Disney to speak of. Good IT management will leave, incompetent IT management is what will be left.

    And they will get hacked in and their movies, intellectual property stolen, computer system destroyed. Maybe cruise ship computers hijacked.

    Just give it time, it will be spectacular. Definitely worth the wait.

  109. Re:You reap what you sow. by trparky · · Score: 2

    But here's the problem. Unlike in the past we really do have the technology to put everyone out of work. Everyone including...

    * The factory worker. Once thought as a safe job, now being replaced by robots.
    * The warehouse worker. Again, once thought as a safe job, now being replaced by robots. We had an article about this on this very site. http://hardware.slashdot.org/s...
    * Retail employee working the cash register, replaced by self-scan registers.
    * Fast food worker, replaced by self-order kiosks and machines that can even make a burger.
    * Customer and technical support agents on the phone, replaced by the likes of IBM Watson.
    * Janitor, replaced by a robot that can clean toilets, mop floors, etc.

    And that's just the start of the jobs that everyday people rely on for their very survival that simply won't exist anymore. Not everyone can have a college degree. Hell, we have too many of them as it is in the USA. Tons of people with college degrees, even technical degrees, and they can't find work. Why? Because either the job has been completely automated by a computer or a robot.

    So when all of that happens, what do you think is going to happen? The very people who were once the life-blood of the economy will quite simply have no way to earn money. The system will collapse.

  110. Cannot be a contractor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article is misiinforming.
    H1 visas are temporary work permits that bind a person to a company. There cannot be contrcators with H1 visas. The owner of a H1 visa is an employee of a given company and that person cannot leave the company that issued the visa or the visa will become null and the person will have to leave the contry in two weeks.

  111. Capital is no longer bothering to even pretend by Catbeller · · Score: 1

    Capital is so overwhelmingly victorious that they aren't bothering to pretend it's about worker shortages anymore. They don't give a flying fuck about their country; they believe their only responsibility is to make money. They are wrong; corporations are government creatures, not private entities. They've no existence other than governmental laws that grant them their superpowers. That existence comes with requirements, and one of those requirements is that they exist for the good of the country that was gracious enough to let them enjoy their legal immunity and ability to print money. The idea they have no other god but money is their own notion, brought into law by their own lobbying efforts, and it is wrong. They have obligations to their community to provide jobs, to obey laws about the effects of their pollution, and in other respects act like the human beings they bought laws to say that they are. You want power? You also get responsibility. Right now they get the former and dismiss the latter.

  112. Re:What's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiotic statement. Read up before posting. This means reviewing ALL of RON PAULS videos. But that takes work. Can't interrupt your XBOX and CNN time now.

  113. Absolutely. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Birth control and more options for recreation.

    Poor people can't afford jet skis, game systems, ski trips, etc., so when they have kids to raise they aren't giving much up.
    People who can afford these things, want them, and recognize that raising kids means giving a lot of that up for a very long time.

    Kids cost a rich person a lot more than they cost a poor person....and contraception is very cheap for a rich person.

    I don't buy the argument that being too busy working is the primary factor that stops rich people from having kids.

  114. H1B's are here to stay and grow by Tennessee+Bear · · Score: 1

    This is nothing new. Having worked in IT for over 50 years I have seen this many times. Bottom line, its a cost issue. Contractors can be let go faster then employees, there are no legacy or current benefits to pay. You can "ramp up" and down your staff. The contractor usually cost a little more per hour, but easily replaced or removed. The "lie" that there are no qualified US based candidates, at any price is false and always has been. What companies get with H1B staff is "cheap" labor that is well educated and motivated. I can tell you that I have always seen adds for 5 years experience in new tech at lousy salaries for "young" staff. Their is feeling in the industry that your stale if you are over 40, you want too much money and you will not work for a younger boss. The truth, and I have seen this, is that you can contract young H1Bs, pay less, dispose of them when done and keep the cream till later. Life's bitch, but that's reality. I lived with it and so must the current generation. It's not going to change. Costs must be low to complete. At least the H1B's pay us tax's, that better the offshoring the job.

  115. No More Disney For me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny. My interest in going to Disney just suddenly disappeared.

  116. Boohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sucks that you lost your job, but the problem isn't the Indians or the H-1B visas - the problem is that you have priced yourself higher than you're worth in the global economy. Evil Megacorp X could of course keep employing overpriced employees, but eventually they would lose market share or even go under because someone else produces the same service more efficiently.

    1. Re:Boohoo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > the problem is that you have priced yourself higher than you're worth in the global economy.

      Evidently you missed out on NAFTA, IMF, WTO protests in Seattle, all that crap. The news is that the "global economy" favors big corporations, so they can make their trinkets for less money overseas and try to sell them to the few of us left in the USA who have any disposable income.

      I can't change the cost of living where I live; I have to make a living wage based on what bread costs in my neighborhood, not what it costs in New Delhi. Boneheads like you who support this bullshit would probably suggest that I just "move to India." :-P

  117. Re:You reap what you sow. by blue9steel · · Score: 1

    I eventually see this entire system collapsing within the next ten years and not just IT (Information Technology) but the whole economy.

    It'll likely be a slow hollowing out rather than an overnight crash. It'll be a like a giant game of musical chairs with everyone scrambling for fewer and fewer seats. I could easily see us reaching 50% unemployment even without the development of strong AI, just the extension of current trends in robotics and expert systems.

  118. See if I take my granddaughter to a Disney pic by whitroth · · Score: 1

    Or maybe I'll pirate views of them. Give Disney money for screwing the US?

                    mark

  119. Boycott Avengers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Disney only understands economic messages, then pass on their dopey entertainment...

  120. At any wage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > when no qualified American — at any wage — can be found to fill the position.

    Sounds like this would just completely kill the H-1B visa. "At any wage" is impossible to satisfy because obviously you could find someone to do peon work for a wage that is double the CEO's pay. "At a competitive wage" or "At a reasonable wage" would be more appropriate but would require some definition.

  121. ok ok.. here is the deal.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I see comments about singleing out, everyone's doing it, and or it may be a fact of life as things evolve and progress..
    lets break it down.
    1. the single out is to surface how deep the issues/situation has or have become.. Disney is Akin to "apple Pie" "americana at its best" and now look @ what it's reduced to. I have no issues with foreigners, if its the right fit for the position it should not matter!. But when people are used as tools to offset others in the community, there is a problem.. Does the saying hold true then, you get what you pay for? Example, if employe "j" is making 85k a yr doing a task, then they pull in employee "k" to do the same task at 65k yr. Can the employer have a resonable expectation that things will will getdone along with more responsibilities dumped, in a timely manner with the same quality at the reduced rate??
    2. everyones doing it "Apple, HP, IBM, MS, ......." But does that make it right?
    As your parents said, "if every one was jumping off a bridge, would you do it?"
    I feel that argument further perpetuates the false justification of these horrible acts. Its like de-forrestation, cut down/remove the major sources and replace them with less experienced individuals willing to grow and learn "like a Sapling thats planted in place of a cut down tree." I can hear the conversation now "What, we can mold them to what every want (as our wills desire) and pay them 25% less. Wow where do i sign up?"
    3. Lets examine the quality of work rendered,
    a. communication is lack lustre, to many gaps in getting things across and whats worse there is little incentive to change that. Which results in poor returns..
    b. some of the Individuals in these roles are also taking advantage of the situation knowing "my employer has heged a huge bet on my performance and being here to displace my predecessor inorder to get their project done under cost "up front" what happens after the project/applicaiton/ or object is complete and flaws then surface, all of which are beyond the scope of the individuals skillsets to resolve at that "pay grade." so what happens is another senior guy is brought in to finish up the project, at which poiint that individual is paid out of a different budget, so the "black eye" wont surface any time soon, and the project is still complete..

    So to this I ask, whom are the winners and the loosers in this situation?
    "the people at the top whom are in a position to cover it up will allways be ahead, since they have the money/power to displace their eventuality to a later time frame"

  122. Re:You reap what you sow. by Moof123 · · Score: 1

    Yet I had to struggle to get 4 weeks of vacation time.

    The obvious medium term band-aid to is start restricting working hours to 45 absolute max a week, and restrict the number of work days per year to make people take time off and regain some mental health. Get rid of the salary sham for all those working for under $100k (indexed to inflation). If your company relies on 60 hour work weeks, then hire more people.

    We could soak up huge swaths of idle labor if we prioritized quality of life more.

  123. Re:What's the problem by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    What is wrong if they can find someone who can do it for cheaper?

    Doesn't a CEO have a right to run his business the way he sees fit. If you can't compete with these low end folks with language barriers that says more about you than it does about cost cutting.

    I can tell you have thought long and hard on this topic.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  124. Re:What's the problem by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

    What is wrong if they can find someone who can do it for cheaper?

    Doesn't a CEO have a right to run his business the way he sees fit. If you can't compete with these low end folks with language barriers that says more about you than it does about cost cutting.

    The CEO is probably one of the highest paid people in the company. Surely, they could find someone to do that job for less. And yet, that calculation never seems to come up. Funny, eh?

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  125. Re:How can this be leagal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Did you drink Coffee today?

    No.

    > Who mows your lawn?

    I do.

    > Do you eat out at expensive restaurants every lunch? No?

    Most of the time it comes from the grocery store.

  126. Re:What's the problem by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    Right, because I'm not supposed to be allowed to petition my government to change abusive practices. Im supposed to stand aside as I see wrong and say nothing about it to my governing body. Is that what you are REALLY saying?

    --
    Good-bye
  127. Re:be a basketball by davester666 · · Score: 1

    whoosh.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  128. Re:What's the problem by turp182 · · Score: 1

    I thought you were referring to the companies themselves, and not public action persuading the government to create/enforce certain labor laws.

    Sorry for any confusion.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  129. Workarounds by phorm · · Score: 1

    Yeah, so these probably did some quasi-legal manoeuvring to get around this
    a) Created a new position with a different skillset for the H1-B, whose duties happen to overlap (oh, but the old guy/gal wasn't qualified to do X,Y,Z he/she only knew X)
    b) Created/hired a third-party/shell company, filled with H1B, and subcontracted the work to it

    The latter seems to be popular, these days, then they can say "well, we didn't hire foreign workers, we're just contracting the work to EvilCorp which happens to have mostly H1-B's as employees"

  130. We should boycott by solid_liq · · Score: 1

    Seriously, we should all start boycotting companies which do this. There are enough of us now to make an impact. If we can convince our friends and families to boycott, too, it will make it more expensive to hire H1Bs than it is to hire Americans. We need to stop idly watching from the sidelines and do something about this. If we don't, they're free to use, abuse, and discard us with impunity.

  131. IT must unionize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Although I'm not a fan of unions, it seems IT folks must unionize in order to protect their jobs. In particular, they need to get affiliated with the Teamsters. Then, if the employers try to fire their American workers and hire foreigners, the fired IT workers can picket the workplace. And good luck to the company in getting any union truckers to deliver anything to the company, because they won't cross a Teamsters picket line.

    It's stuff like this why unions were originally organized, it's just too bad the modern day unions have gotten too involved in other non-relevant political issues.

    Rusty

  132. But we'll all still go see Star Wars VII right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like the move by Disney to replace local IT staff with H1B workers, but are still going to go see Star Wars VII, then there is a word for you.

    Hypocrit.

  133. Petition to veto more H1B's by pseudorand · · Score: 1

    Don't for get to sign the MoveOn.org petition instruction the prez to veto S.169, the senate bill proposing an expansion of the H1B program.
    http://www.petitions.moveon.or...

  134. History might not repeat itself... by mrflash818 · · Score: 1

    ...but it sure does rhyme

    Historically there was the Aristocracy, and everyone else barely scraped by. Any concept of a middle class was quite small (maybe the town blacksmith?)

    Sadly, it seems things are headed back to the historical norm: The One Percent doing just fine, with everyone else just surviving day-to-day, (or even more sadly, perhaps not even surviving the day).

    --
    Uh, Linux geek since 1999.
  135. *I WORK IN DISNEY I.T* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *I WORK IN DISNEY I.T*

    Well, I don't even know where to begin, besides I can tell you, Disney is a disgusting company to work for that DO NOT care about their employees, Disney only cares about squeezing every last cent out of America. Disney takes hard earned American money and ships it overseas. Disney employs several companies, Xerox, HCL..etc to be "staffing agencies." For now most people who support Disney's users are contractors. (US contractors because Disney fired most of their in house people already) Whenever we need get with a programmer, database administrator, someone with a long title, the actual high paying I.T jobs that need advanced education and training, we have to message someone else in India!!! It's only the low paying I.T jobs Disney has kept here in the US. You know the jobs they keep talking about for our future?... Only corporate propaganda and lies made up by Disney! They already outsourced those jobs! People here are talking about how they trained someone who got off a plane to replace them, you better believe its true!! There goes our economy, the money these people make goes back overseas. Disney for years has had this nasty habit of hiring workers as contractors for 6 months at a time, then letting them go for no reason. After another 6 months they will hire the same contractors back because they were sued in the past for denying workers benefits for long time employees, some how this method is a loophole for Disney. All this from a company that is one of the richest companies in the world! This is not about dislike for foreigners, this about American companies abusing American people!

    Is this the country we want to leave to our children? Why do we want to keep hurting ourselves? Or letting companies like these do it!

  136. Fuck Disney by Virtucon · · Score: 1

    Fuck Disney and their Fucking retarded media, overpriced theme parks and targeted marketing to kids. It's time that this company be dismantled and sent to the bottom of the submarine ride.

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
  137. Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what Disney? Fuck Star Wars: Episode VII.
    I'll vote with my wallet, assholes.

  138. Re:Somebody can do it cheaper? Fire that costly CE by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

    Yyou don't get it. The brotherhood of multinational corporate executives are the ones running this show. They aren't going to outsource themselves - they're at the top of this ponzi scheme.

  139. quid pro quo by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    You have to understand one thing.
    In order for Disney to sell products in India, they have to provide India with business.
    Disney is NOT going to give up that business to protect your job.

  140. HR have feelings too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let them go, let them go
    Can't hold them back anymore
    Let them go, let them go
    Turn away and slam the door!

  141. I'm down with TPP you know what I mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ain't no job like an outsourced job under the TPP trade and IT job export deal!

  142. So! Tell me, Bob..... by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

    Tell me why you want American's dollars but no American employees?

    Horseshit! Bob!

  143. Disney is a for profit company without a soul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disney is a for profit company. Employees are dispensible, as are everything else. I read many years ago, that for a Western movie,
    Disney had a horse jump off a cliff into water, with the next scene, the horse swimming. What the public did not know was that horses were killed until a successful shot was obained. The horses were just collateral damage. The end justified the deaths.

    That mentality pervades the entire thinking or corporate America, and in particular Disney. They don't give a s??t what happens to long term employees, employees who put out for them, and f??k their families too. Disney is unique, in that competition does not really exist. Is what exists "cold hard malice"? Should not directors and senior management also be replaced by H1Bs?

    1. Re:Disney is a for profit company without a soul by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read many years ago, that for a Western movie, Disney had a horse jump off a cliff into water, with the next scene, the horse swimming. What the public did not know was that horses were killed until a successful shot was obained. The horses were just collateral damage. The end justified the deaths.

      Not "horses," just one horse. And it wasn't a Disney movie, it was a 20th Century Fox movie, Jesse James.

      http://www.lakehistory.info/jessejamesmovie.html

      They weren't trying to kill the horse, either - they were just stupid enough to think the horse would take the fall and be okay with it.

      I'm not aware of any film where they just threw away horses' lives to get a good take, but I did hear about lots of horses dying in tripwire accidents while filming The Charge of the Light Brigade.

  144. GREED by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all day erry'day

  145. States rights by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    were given to keep a strong central gov't from redistributing wealth. The wealthy landowners wanted a weak central gov't that couldn't challenge their power and authority. Say what you will about strong central gov'ts, but there isn't really an alternative that can stand up to an aristocracy. The trick is keeping it from becoming crony style fascism. But it's worth the risk. The only difference between corporate fueled aristocracy and fascism is the color of the jack boot at your neck. Might as well roll the dice with a strong central gov't and try to hang on to it. The only thing you really have to do is not let the bastards divide and conquer. All you need is worker solidarity.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  146. Why USA is issuing H1B visas? by NewYork · · Score: 1

    Why USA is issuing H1B visas to most racist people on earth?
    https://petitions.whitehouse.g...
    https://www.change.org/p/presi...

  147. A giant Ponzi/Pyramid scam in Globalization; by NewYork · · Score: 1
  148. It's kinda evil...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They destroy your job at home and then call you a loser for not having a job.

    They won't get away with that for long.......

  149. If I had known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would have NEVER scheduled my trip to DW. I'm outraged because of all the dislaced U.S. employees. Are the H1-B workers going to run the park too? This will definitely be my last trip to the parks. DW was created in the U.S. Why ruin it by pulling this stunt. Only because they are the lowest bidders. If they had done their research, they'll notice that their quality of work sucks. Projects given to the lowest bidders. Well, we all know what's going to happen now--all going downhill. Sorry, Disney, but you totally f-ed up this time.

  150. Re:What's the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is wrong if they can find someone who can do it for cheaper?

    Doesn't a CEO have a right to run his business the way he sees fit.

    Absolutely not. Even as far back as Adam Smith (several centuries ago), it was clear that business leaders can not be allowed to run their business the way they see fit, because some large percentage of these people will inevitably do things harmful to society. Go read Smith's Wealth of Nations: the book discusses these issues in an 18th century context. You can find a more modern discussion of the issues in many current books, but the historical background will be helpful to show the long term trends.

    Often the misbehavior of business leaders takes the form of avoiding having to deal with prices set by a market, by manipulating either supply or demand, much like is happening with the H1B issue. This is not a new problem, but rather a very old problem taking on a new face.

    Some regulation of business is necessary for capitalist systems to function to the long term benefit of society. Free markets can only exist within the context of appropriate regulation: this is one of the most difficult concepts of basic economics to grasp for those that haven't studied economics with a good instructor, you should get some further education in this area. The trick for a society is to decide what to regulate and how.

    If you can't compete with these low end folks with language barriers that says more about you than it does about cost cutting.

    There are large numbers of people who can compete with the majority of folks with H1Bs. In practice, few if any H1Bs are issued to folks with unique skills, since there are other types of visa available in such cases.

    The sociopaths that run many businesses do not want to treat their employees well, since the employees aren't real people to them (that's essentially the definition of what a sociopath is). The H1B system allows these executives to import people that are essentially indentured servants. These people can be treated badly by the employer and have little or no recourse. The sociopaths are incapable of understanding that they can get better work from people by treating them well.

    Go read about the history of indentured servitude, and you'll find many parallels to what is happening today. What is amazing is that people think they can still get away with this stuff, and it is somewhat embarrassing to be a citizen of a nation that is still permitting this to occur. Indentured servitude, like slavery, has been illegal in civilized nations for over a century, but in practice it still happens because the sociopaths don't think they are subject to the laws and values of civilized society. They find ways to get around the law, or to buy the law.

    There's an interesting parallel to the current situation in the history of the Soviet Union. Stalin was able to get work from his scientists and engineers by threatening to send their families to the gold mines. Since almost nobody returned from the mines, this was an effective threat, and the scientists and engineers produced some remarkable stuff. This shows that coerced labor can still be effective, even if un-coerced labor is vastly more effective over the long term.

    The H1B system is an attempt by sociopaths to achieve something along the same lines as what Stalin did -- using the threat of deportation to a bad place (of an individual and their family) to coerce people to work to the advantage of the masters -- hidden within the legal system of a supposedly modern and civilized nation like a scorpion under a rock.

    Over the long term, of course, the sociopath will fail, since coerced labor is never as good as free labor over the long term, but these people are incapable of understanding that. They do not think in the long term, but rather look to short term temporary advantage (or, in this case, the illusion of advantage).

    Fixing the H1B issue only fixes the symptoms of a mo

  151. Training by phorm · · Score: 1

    Well, for coding jobs, it often does involve stepping through how the code/systems work. Unless in a "nice" scenario where you're teaching a new guy the ropes (while not facing the sword of damacles yourself), it's basically "here's all the shit you need to do to keep the lights on."