Slashdot Mirror


The Next Java Update Could Make Yahoo Your Default Search Provider

itwbennett writes: At the company's shareholder meeting on Wednesday, Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer announced a partnership with Oracle that could result in Yahoo becoming your default search provider in your browser. Starting this month, when users are prompted to update to the next version of Java, they'll be asked to make Yahoo their default search engine on Chrome (and Internet Explorer, for what it's worth). And, according to a Wall Street Journal report, the button will be checked by default, so if you aren't looking out for it, you might unwittingly find yourself a Yahoo user.

226 of 328 comments (clear)

  1. This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by kelarius · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems to me like this will lump them in with Ask.com and other bullshit sites that drive traffic through mostly shady means. Giving up Marissa?

    --
    Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    1. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by pla · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This. People just looove it when their homepage or search provider changes. Why, just the other day, a coworker told me how much he loved Bing coming back after every round of Windows updates.

      Oh, no, wait, he switched to Chrome because he hated it so much. Take the hint, Marissa.

      As an aside, though - Does anyone actually allow Java to update itself? Of all the common self-updating software out there, Java easily wins as the single most obnoxious. Aside from hijacking the top result when I type "update" in the start menu's search bar... Aside from running all the fucking time rather than just when Java starts... Aside from nagging the user more relentlessly than even the far more legitimate Windows update (Bing aside) - It actively breaks shit every time it updates. You had one job, Larry...

    2. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Microsoft started flagging the Ask toolbar as malware recently in Windows Defender, and automatically removing it. They did so because the Ask toolbar changes your default search provider without asking. Seems like if they made the Java installer do that too, the entire installer would be flagged as malware by Microsoft.

      Could be interesting.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Only on a very short lease, and only because the alternatives are even worse.

      The fact that you have to slog through the Java Platform, Standard Edition: MSI Enterprise JRE Installer Guide for Windows to neuter the worst of its behavior is pretty damned annoying, however. Just a few last legacy uses and I can finally pull the plug...

      And, for the few bastard applications that break on remotely modern JREs, it's fun with 'static installations' and breaking out the Deployment Rule Set.

      Recitation of the thricefold forbidden execrations while bathing the system being updated in the blood of a freshly slaughtered goat is optional; but recommended.

    4. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by kelarius · · Score: 2

      the Java installer has been pushing the ask toolbar for years now, so no.

      --
      Personally I'd rather have my idiots at home glued to the TV than out doing idiotic things
    5. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Adobe just did this for mcafee so yeah, it seems to me that all the companies seem to think this is just an awesome idea. I know, we'll change shit for people then laugh when this backfires or something! Though I'm pretty sure that this stuff is illegal here in Canada now.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      Changing the user search is bad, but not nearly as bad as installing a crappy browser addon that hijacks your search.
      I think the former is a bothersome, but tolerable advertising practice (all advertising is bothersome in a way). The latter should be a criminal offence.

    7. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 5, Funny

      I find it ironic that Ask would do that without, er, asking. Clearly, it's questionable behavior.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Funny

      Since when is "questionable" a synonym for "evil"?

    9. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why, just the other day, a coworker told me how much he loved Bing coming back after every round of Windows updates.

      Windows Update doesn't do that. Microsoft's anti-malware tools sometimes do, if they detect that your default search provider or homepage have been changed to malware sites. Both Windows Defender and the Malicious Software Removal Tool get updated with Windows Update every month, so maybe that's why his settings kept being reset.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    10. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by kenh · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whoosh!

      Ask, questionable... Come on, you didn't see that coming?

      --
      Ken
    11. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by kenh · · Score: 1

      Have you not seen this behavior before? The user is asked, but the box is prefilled, you have to opt out, rather than opt in.

      --
      Ken
    12. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      How exactly is this an OS issue? This is an apps issue.

    13. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by pla · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Yeah, fantastic suggestion! Say, could you just convince my boss, his boss, and three more layers up, that we need to:
      • Scrap $300k in MS licensing and established server deployments,
      • Spend a year or two rewriting everything we have in production that depends on Windows or IIS,
      • Replace or retrain our entire netops, infosec, and helpdesk with people who know Linux,
      • Retrain 15k users and watch their productivity drop to a crawl for at least six months...

      ...Just so we can switch to an OS that "cares"? ;)

      I like Linux. I run Linux at home. But I make my living putting up with Windows.

    14. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by grahamtriggs · · Score: 4, Informative

      Both should be a criminal offence - If I install an application (e.g. Java), then it should do what it needs to do to make that application work, not mess around with *my* environment unnecessarily.

    15. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Z00L00K · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If all anti-virus softwares started to list any installer with an "Opt-Out" procedure as "Potentially Unwanted Program Installer" it would put an end to the habit of pushing shit down the throat of users.

      The problem is not so much people competent with tech as people that don't know left from right on computers and just clicks "Ok". They suffer from all that crap like a new browser installed as well as changed homepages and search providers and then they scream that they don't understand their computer.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    16. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Xest · · Score: 5, Interesting

      As a professional developer who has led a number of fairly large scale Java projects I've always just accepted the existence of Java on my computer, it's a thing I've worked with so it's a thing I need. Or so my default thinking always went.

      But the last time Java asked for permission to update on my computer at home there appeared to no longer be an obvious way of avoiding the Ask toolbar install. I had a choice of next, or cancel which cancelled the whole installation. I was getting fed up of it anyway, given that it seemed to be persistently asking to update every time I went to my computer anyway.

      Java, therefore is gone from my home computer and I will no longer consider it for any spare time projects. This has the knock on effect that it's reduced in desirability for me as an option when determining what technology to use for new commercial projects at work too. If I have a choice between Java + Ask, or no Java, it's not really a difficult choice for me.

      So for me, Yahoo can stick whatever they want on it, but under Oracle's stewardship it's going to end up a dying product. For some reason, Yahoo seems incredibly intent on consistently tying itself up with losers. Instead of continuously wasting money backing losers, they should probably just spend what needs to be spent on backing a winner for once.

      I like Java as a technology, and a language - hell, I've posted enough times here defending it, but when the client distribution forces the installation of malware like Ask, it's pretty much a dead end for anything desktop based. You can't as a professional insist your clients install something that tries to bundle malware to use your product with a serious face, it's just not tenable. It'd be one thing if it was just a one off question you could say no to on initial installation, but the frequent updates often mean it can be an attempt to force it on you multiple times a week in some cases. It hopes that in just one of those cases, you'll forget to untick the checkbox and accidentally install, well, obviously that hoping was fruitless, because now there just is no checkbox to untick.

      I understand that with command line switches you can tell Java to skip that crap, and that there are options to automate installation without it in corporate environments but frankly in the end it's just easier to not install Java in the first place unless you simply have no choice.

      I can't say I've missed it one bit, I can't remember the last time I needed it for anything at home. So my "I need that because I work with it" attitude has changed to "Why did I ever put up with all those incessant update nag screens for years". I've got better things to do than play the "try and remember to avoid installing malware because Java wants to update" game every time I sit down at my computer.

    17. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by SQLGuru · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I've never actually had it successfully UPDATE. I've always had to uninstall whatever version I have and download the full installer myself. I'm at the point where I pretty much don't install it except when I need it....and uninstall it a week or so later when I'm done running it.

      Also, Bing has gotten so much better. I use it about as much as I use Google. It's not like it once was. That being said, I've never had Windows Update change my search settings.....probably something else did it.

    18. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by slack_justyb · · Score: 1

      Just curious, why not just use OpenJDK? We ditched Oracle flavored Java a bit ago because it was very annoying how updates with it worked. Is there a reason you couldn't go with OpenJDK?

    19. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by m.alessandrini · · Score: 2

      It's true, but Windows Vista used to ask "Are you sure" 3 times when changing a system settings, they could have put the same effort in warning you of similar activities done by installers, or restricting a little bit more what an installer can do, especially when the OS business model is relying 99% on 3rd party software.

    20. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by sinrakin · · Score: 2

      This is sad. Yahoo has been in a gradual decline for years, but this just seems like throwing in the towel. They're now officially malware.

    21. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Agreed... though funny enough, it probably still won't show me that window. But then, this is probably why:

      # yum update jre jdk

      In all seriousness though, I am curious as to whether or not they'll screw around with the more automated/*nix-like updates, or if it's just the typical 'doze and OSX users who will have to keep an eye out.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    22. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by bondsbw · · Score: 2

      Windows has never required the use of a common installer platform. It was always possible for a developer to custom-build an installer to do whatever they wanted (within the constraints of security mechanisms like UAC). The installer could be a bunny hopping across your screen, opening Explorer, and pooing files into the install folders.

      FWIW, Windows 10 is looking to improve that situation. Universal Windows Platform apps will only have one installer mechanism, AppX, which will highly restrict what the installer can do on the system. I believe it will also enforce a common application update strategy. This same installer mechanism will be available for all UWP apps, both on the Windows Store and sideloaded, and it will also be used for desktop apps on the Windows Store (Project Centennial).

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    23. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      How exactly is this an OS issue? This is an apps issue.

      Depends - sometimes the nature of the OS ecosystem doesn't have room for such BS. If you install/update your freebie applications through apt-get, YUM, the OSX .dmg 'Drop-it-in-the-Applications-Directory' format, or Apple's App Store***, you don't get any wizards or 'options' at all, and for some very obvious reasons. No package (at least so far) delivered that way will screw around with your browser settings or plugins, or add stupid search bars (unless what you're downloading *is* a search bar), etc.

      *** Apple's App Store I think explicitly forbids such crap, but not 100% certain of that. Also note that any downloaded OSX application that contains a .pkg file or similar thing (Java does this) will send you to wizard hell, just like an .msi and/or .exe will.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    24. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      I believe GP was talking about home users, and it seems pretty obvious that he was.

      After all, if you don't already have that privacy/security shit squared away in your enterprise, then, well...

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    25. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by drewsup · · Score: 2

      Try getting anything from download (aka cnet) its all bundled crapware now

    26. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by pla · · Score: 1

      I believe GP was talking about home users, and it seems pretty obvious that he was.

      I am the GGP, and specifically mentioned "coworkers". The GP said nothing to change that context.

    27. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by codemachine · · Score: 1

      If that is true, it is ironic that by trying to fix a malware issue for their customer, Microsoft has angered the person and driven them away from their product.

    28. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Rasperin · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's because I use the JDK or something but I have _never, ever_ had an issue with updating java. Just download, install to a new directory, go through and update all the old reference paths (if not using JAVA_HOME/JDK_HOME individually), reboot the computer, hop on one foot and pray to, previously Ra, now The Oracle, offer a virgin sacrifice, reinstall tomcat, and feed a mountain lion. I mean how hard is that?!

      On the real note though, if I'm just updating for a new update version (which I very rarely do as what's released in say JDK 1.6u18 and JDK 1.6u19 is so rarely needed to be done, then again 1.6u17->1.6u18 was a bit of a doozy so it just depends) I can usually just run the installer without issue. If I do a major revision like hell if you think I'm even going to try to update the old folder unless I uninstall it first.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    29. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by ADRA · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a professional java developer who's 'led a number or fairly large scale Java projects', you never realized the JDK includes a fully functional JRE without ad-crap installed? Color me suspicious.

      --
      Bye!
    30. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Recitation of the thricefold forbidden execrations while bathing the system being updated in the blood of a freshly slaughtered goat is optional; but recommended.

      That's fine if they at least provide the goat.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    31. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by sconeu · · Score: 2

      The installer could be a bunny hopping across your screen, opening Explorer, and pooing files into the install folders.

      I am SO tempted to try to write this now...

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    32. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by ZeroWaiteState · · Score: 1

      Why not change the user's desktop background and color scheme while they're at it. Its all value add, right?

    33. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by dissy · · Score: 2

      One thing I did that helped was push out a program called UnChecky (Google it, or just add dot com for their site) to our domain.

      They maintain a list of installers that do the default-on bullshit options, and when one of those installers is run it uses UI automation calls to turn off all the bundled offers.

      I think it is/was more targeted at end-users that hammer the OK/next buttons until things go away, but with the event of updater software silently installing bundled crap it is easy for even a seasoned vet to fall into this trap since there is little to no indication of what the installer is doing.

      May be an option to look into adding to ye ole toolbox.

    34. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by chilenexus · · Score: 1

      > it's questionable behavior.

      it's question-free behavior.

    35. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      I make my living happily working with Linux. Why would you "put up" with something that you don't enjoy?

    36. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is an option to disable this in Java's control panel last I checked.

    37. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by armanox · · Score: 1

      Is that so? YUM makes perfect sense - YellowDog Update Manager - as in the Update Manager from YellowDog Linux. Seems like a logical naming choice to me.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    38. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by tehlinux · · Score: 1

      Yeah, let me know when they release Visual Studio for linux.

      --
      Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
    39. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by PincushionMan · · Score: 3, Informative

      I do. But I went to the Java control panel applet, advanced, and checked that very last option "Suppress Sponsor Offers when Installing or Updating Java". I'd love to know how to do this in the registry.

    40. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      How exactly is this an OS issue? This is an apps issue.

      Agree, unfortunately it's getting worse. And this isn't a new thing for Java. Ask Toolbar, and other shovelware has been included before. At least a browser search engine change is fairly benign. Flash keeps trying to install a junk McAfee security scan (that can conflict with AV software)when doing updates. uTorrent (the once mighty Torrent Client), tries to install Conduit browser hijacker. Even ImgBurn, the once great CD/DVD burning tool now has OpenCandy Adware junk bundled.

      Download.com used to be a safe place I could direct people to download software. Now it tries to install junkware. SourceForge tried to bundle adware with people's open source projects.

      For now at least Ninite is a safe place to get a lot of essential software without opting out of installers. Another trick that works is a lot of Adware won't try to install if there isn't an active internet connection.

    41. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      At least it wasn't an update manager from CentOS or BlackArch

    42. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      If all anti-virus softwares started to list any installer with an "Opt-Out" procedure as "Potentially Unwanted Program Installer" it would put an end to the habit of pushing shit down the throat of users.

      The problem is not so much people competent with tech as people that don't know left from right on computers and just clicks "Ok". They suffer from all that crap like a new browser installed as well as changed homepages and search providers and then they scream that they don't understand their computer.

      ImgBurn started including OpenCandy Adware in their installer. I didn't notice until Symantec at work flagged the Installer. I didn't notice it at home because I install it using Ninite (which means I don't have to opt out), and I didn't notice at install time at work because it couldn't get an internet connection through the proxy during install-time, so the OpenCandy Opt-out page never showed up in the installer.

    43. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      Both should be a criminal offence - If I install an application (e.g. Java), then it should do what it needs to do to make that application work, not mess around with *my* environment unnecessarily.

      Especially if it's an update. If it's an update it should respect the user's preferences, not try to trick them again.

    44. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by golgotha007 · · Score: 1

      You choose your own destiny. I make my living happily working with Linux..

    45. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Open Control Panel
      Click on the Java applet
      Click on Advanced tab
      Scroll all the way to the bottom
      Select to suppress sponsor offers when installing or updating Java
      Click apply/ok
      *tada.wav*

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    46. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Bookmarks updated - thanks. I do not have use for it so I did not install it, I assume it works as advertised. I am well trained to uncheck the boxes and to do an advanced install where possible. I do, on the other hand, have some not-so-diligent friends. They will, hopefully, utilize something like this as it is almost a ritual for me to have to fix their computers when I visit. Worse, sometimes they bring them to me. I even keep a spare desk with two monitors, keyboards, and mice and only one computer hooked up - the other is for when "friends" drop by with a broken box that needs some TLC.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    47. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by KGIII · · Score: 1

      I was sent to their site to download a driver application (no mirrors aside from them) and it had no added crap with it. I have seen added crap from them before. Maybe there is some sort of agreement going on with them and authors?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    48. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Xest · · Score: 2

      Of course I do, but I don't have any control over client deployments, and I never really saw any point going out of my way to explicitly install it on my home computer when it's already long had the consumer auto-updating version of the JRE on it.

      Just because it's there, hidden out the way, doesn't mean it's guaranteed to be the one everyone will use.

    49. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by Xest · · Score: 1

      Not going forward, but a lot of our existing contracts, for example for some of the large banks mandate that we continue to build with what we've always worked with, and the official Java packages weren't always that obnoxious.

      The fact they've now reached a point where trying to force Ask on you without even offering an obvious opt-out is really the straw that broke the camels back.

      As I say, it's not that I absolutely wont use Java any more, I suspect I will, and certain then I'd always tend towards OpenJDK going forward. But the very existence of such fragmentation coupled with this sort of obnoxiousness really hurts it as an option.

      Technologies have to be easy to adopt to grow market share, and once they get lazy, and stop doing that, and start doing the opposite, decline is inevitable. Oracle needs a wake up call, because the very fact that you have to choose between different flavours in the first place is problematic enough.

      We always joke here on Slashdot about "Oh no, not another language" but the fact we do is symptomatic of the fact that the world of technology is insanely competitive, and then why continue to use Java if something better comes along that doesn't require that you make choices between flavours, and have to go out your way to warn clients not to use _that_ version because it contains malware and to use this version that says to use that version but ignore that it says to use that version and use this version which you can download from this third party? It's all rather unnecessary.

      We're seeing both Apple and Microsoft tred into what was classically Java's territory now, and these are both big names, so it's not like we're even talking about simply having to make a choice between a tried and tested technology supported by a big company and some fly by night pet language project run by a 13 year old kid in his bedroom. Java has real competition now.

    50. Re: This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by nerdonamotorcycle · · Score: 1

      Seconded on Unchecky. Another thing crapware installers commonly do is obfuscate below multiple layers of double-negatives: "Are you sure you don't want to not install Crapware Toolbar now?" So even the reasonably savvy and aware can be misled into making the wrong choice. Unchecky helps greatly with that. Another option is to use Ninite for installing all sorts of useful stuff, including Java. Ninite automatically unchecks all the crapware checkboxes as well.

    51. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by beastofburdon · · Score: 1
    52. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No package (at least so far) delivered that way will screw around with your browser settings or plugins, or add stupid search bars (unless what you're downloading *is* a search bar), etc.

      It's not because there's no technical way for them to do so (if I remember correctly, apt-get at least allows packages to run arbitrary shell code as root). It's because no-one has bothered, which I suspect is largely because the target audience for such things (which in this case is desktop users - there's no point installing Ask toolbar or changing the search engine on the server) is so small, but also, and probably more importantly, because any package that'd do it would be nuked out of the repo right away.

      So basically this is an argument in favor of curated software repos.

    53. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by tehlinux · · Score: 1

      That is a glorified text editor.

      --
      Most linux users don't know this, but the man pages were named after Chuck Norris. Chuck Norris fsck'ing hates noobs!
    54. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Well, isn't it still true that, at least for java, you don't even have to 'install it' on windows. You can just set the jre/jdk binaries in place manually. Make a JAVA_HOME env variable if you want, add it to PATH, etc..

    55. Re:This will do WONDERS for Yahoo's image! by klossner · · Score: 1

      Windows Update installed patch 3038314 which caused IE to stop allowing Google as a "search provider" and reverted the default to Bing. I had to uninstall that patch to bring Google back.

  2. Assholes ... by gstoddart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gee, I'm awful glad I don't have Java on my personal machine any more.

    Because the sleazy bastards running it are mostly interested in their ad revenue.

    Here's a thought, guys ... how about you stop trying to change our browsers for your own benefit?

    Java is dying under the stewardship of Oracle. The sooner the better.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    1. Re:Assholes ... by Nadir · · Score: 2

      Oracle is actually doing very well with Java on the server. Java on the client, otoh, is a different matter.

      --
      --
      The world is divided in two categories:
      those with a loaded gun and those who dig. You dig.
    2. Re:Assholes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Java was dying under the stewardship of Sun. Sun were the ones who installed the ask.com toolbar. Oracle got Java 7 out in 18 months after it having been stalled for six years. Stop FUDing. They also got out Java 8, which is the most vibrant and advanced Java release ever.

    3. Re:Assholes ... by buckfeta2014 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Java 8, which is the most vibrant and advanced Java release ever.

      Yeah, if your view of "vibrant" is puking on a pile of shit...

      --
      Buck Feta. You know what to do.
    4. Re:Assholes ... by jbo5112 · · Score: 2

      Congratulations on getting a product out in only 18 months that includes so many security holes that people were finding 13 per day. While not a good accomplishment, it's still quite a lot of work to create quite the impression. Unfortunately, it's not a good impression. It gets worse when you watch your programs break with security updates. Java was at least becoming more secure under Sun.

      Java 8 may be the most vibrant and advanced release ever, but the language is still horribly limited and any benchmarks I've been able to put it under run slowly while being a memory hog. The number of top severity CVE's (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) still showing up in Java 8 also is staggering.

    5. Re:Assholes ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Lemme guess - Ruby/Haskell/JavaScript/Go rocks, right? Java 8 might not be as sexy or as neck-beard friendly as some of the newer languages, but calling it a pile of shit says more about you than the language.

    6. Re:Assholes ... by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

      > Gee, I'm awful glad I don't have Java on my personal machine any more.

      Same here. Hasn't been on any PC of mine for years and years, and it never will be. Just installing Java slowed my last PC to a crawl, which is unacceptable.

      --
      Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
    7. Re:Assholes ... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Okay Larry, you can stop with the anonymous Slashdot postings - we know it's you.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    8. Re:Assholes ... by goombah99 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of assholes, I'm just grateful that the did not default opt-in the anal probe checkbox.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    9. Re:Assholes ... by bearinboots · · Score: 1

      Java is really good as a server-side language; but who's still using it in the browser? That's stone knives and bear-skins.

    10. Re:Assholes ... by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if your view of "vibrant" is puking on a pile of shit...

      Come now. It's got streams! It's got lambdas! You can pass around references to code and map over lists with 25% of the ease and grace you could have done in Perl, ten years ago!

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    11. Re:Assholes ... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Vibrant?

      What the fuck does that even mean?

      Just because Sun put in the first round of crapware doesn't make Oracle completely absolved - they could have changed it to opt-in rather than opt-out, or removed it entirely. And they're definitely not helping by making my browser more "vibrant and advanced" by jerking with my search settings to use an engine I DON'T FUCKING WANT TO USE.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    12. Re:Assholes ... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      They did cut the scope down quite a bit
      They still haven't delivered Project Jigsaw, originally supposed to be in Java 7
      It might make it in to Java 9

    13. Re:Assholes ... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      If only there were some way to change that default behavior...

      Okay, so you should not have to and checked by default does not mean you can not opt to not make those changes. Anyhow, this is an easily (unless they change something) fixable so that you never have to worry about it again.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    14. Re:Assholes ... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Then change the default behavior if you are too much of a simpleton to observe what you are doing when you are installing an application.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  3. of course it will be a default by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1

    since that insures greater penetration. Th next step is for other software companies that cut deals with search engines to then push an update of their product with their provider as the default choice. I could see some releasing an update that does little more than update the search engine default.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    1. Re:of course it will be a default by BlackPignouf · · Score: 5, Funny

      that insures greater penetration

      That's the right word.

  4. This is not news... by msauve · · Score: 1

    This is not significantly different than the current behavior of asking to install Chrome. It could be much worse, and want to install some adware toolbar. Is it really so hard, if you don't uncheck the box, to reset the search provider to the one you want?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:This is not news... by ihtoit · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's not the point, there's a legal issue here. Actually, it's settled case law: opt outs are illegal. End of argument. The checkbox should default to clear (ie the default search engine should NOT be changed because someone forgot to uncheck the box).

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    2. Re:This is not news... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's settled case law: opt outs are illegal. End of argument.

      What if your source for this claim? Searching for "opt out illegal" doesn't seem to turn up anything relavent.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re: This is not news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're probably searching on Yahoo.

    4. Re:This is not news... by msauve · · Score: 1

      He's got a whole piece of cloth he cut it from.

      Oracle can package Java any way they want, including with "opt-outs." Downloading/installing Java is a voluntary choice the user makes.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    5. Re:This is not news... by jbmartin6 · · Score: 1

      How about I come by your home and leave a brick on the floor, is it really so hard to just put it in the trash if you don't want it? The point is, it is a theft of your time and effort.

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    6. Re:This is not news... by msauve · · Score: 1

      Whoosh. Oracle isn't leaving anything on your floor, unless you invite them to.

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    7. Re:This is not news... by thaylin · · Score: 2

      It is significantly different. The difference between op-in and op-out is massive.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    8. Re:This is not news... by thaylin · · Score: 1

      It depends on where you are from and the content. In the US op-outs are generally legal, but not so much for other countries.

      --
      When you cant win, ad hominem.
    9. Re:This is not news... by fnj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oracle can package Java any way they want, including with "opt-outs." Downloading/installing Java is a voluntary choice the user makes.

      Apologist alert. So if you "voluntarily" choose to engage me to mount new tires on your car, does that mean you don't mind if I install a tracking device in cooperation with the NSA, if you fail to spot the tiny pre-checked box on page 678 of the paperwork? Because everyone should EXPECT tracker installation when they "voluntarily" choose to install new tires, right?

    10. Re:This is not news... by fnj · · Score: 1

      Oracle isn't leaving anything on your floor, unless you invite them to.

      Then obviously, since you are so intellectually honest, if you call me to come and repair your water pipe, you won't mind if I leave a heap of steaming shit on your nice tile floor.

    11. Re: This is not news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But it's still evil. Okay, so there's a way to avoid it - nice. It's still a dick move to reconfigure the user machine like this.

      My machine has a default for a reason. I've set that default based on my preference. That you're changing my preference based on a totally unrelated action is a dick move. That you're changing it based on a required action is a double dick move. Java updates are *not optional* if you want to stay secure.

      Once software reaches this stage it's clearly a failed business venture. What next? We could always ship Java with malware to tap into some of those botnet dollars? How about we ship it with backdoors? How about shipping it with a keylogger? Is there anything else you'd like to ship it with?

      Fuck Java. I'll use C++, thanks.

    12. Re:This is not news... by Gavagai80 · · Score: 2

      Let's say you've moved into an apartment because it was close to your work. Every time they come over for quarterly inspections or to fix an issue you've reported, they mess up your toilet so it'll overflow next time you use it - unless you remember to specifically opt-out by asking them not to do that.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    13. Re:This is not news... by ihtoit · · Score: 4, Informative

      EU Directive 2002/58 on Privacy and Electronic Communications deals with this, as does the maxim "Silence or lack of objection does not imply informed consent", to paraphrase Munby LJ in G (R on the application of) v Nottingham City Council [2008] EWHC 400 (Admin), para. 56.

      --
      Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
    14. Re:This is not news... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent they *can* do these things, and nobody ought should stop them. I hope the reaction from users is "Fuck you I am going to avoid using your products and those of the people you are advertising for like Yahoo whenever possible in the future."

      Bad business practices should be rewarded with less business. People need to stop being sheep and just accepting it.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    15. Re:This is not news... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

      No, they're having the box checked by default - you have to absolutely ask them to not shit on your floor.

      --
      That is all.
    16. Re:This is not news... by SQLGuru · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, changing the tires isn't voluntary --- at least not in my state. You'll fail the state safety inspection if you don't change them when they get to the wear bars.

    17. Re:This is not news... by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

      They already invited themselves, requiring you to revoke their invitation.

    18. Re:This is not news... by masterofthumbs · · Score: 1

      It's more like your mechanic doing an oil change and changing your radio station presets, asking you if you'd like to opt out of actions. Very annoying but not the end of the world.

    19. Re:This is not news... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      No, they're having the box checked by default - you have to absolutely ask them to not shit on your floor.

      And they're a lot like my dog - you might ask them not to, but they'll probably do it anyway.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    20. Re:This is not news... by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      How about I come by your home and leave a brick on the floor, is it really so hard to just put it in the trash if you don't want it? The point is, it is a theft of your time and effort.

      And if you aren't allowed into their home, you can just toss it through a window.

    21. Re:This is not news... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      It is, in no way, okay or acceptable.

      Best case:
      "We're releasing a new version that fixes MANY NASTY EXPLOITED SECURITY HOLES and by the way fucks around with your browser settings. If you don't install it, you get constant nagging to update, and if you do install it, you'd better pay attention or we will install a bunch of shit you don't want."

      More likely case:
      "We're releasing a new version that fixes MANY NASTY EXPLOITED SECURITY HOLES and by the way fucks around with your browser settings. If you don't install it, you get constant nagging to update, and if you do install it, we install a bunch of horseshit shovelware that there is no chance to prevent."

      Fuck that bullshit. Java is quickly becoming the next flash - a framework of yesteryear that has outlived it's usefulness.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    22. Re: This is not news... by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Fuck Java. I'll use C++, thanks.

      It's fun watching the Triceratops duke it out with the T. Rex. That is, if either of you were relevant...

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    23. Re:This is not news... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      You mention having to pay attention. Shouldn't you be paying attention when inputting commands to your computer as your default mode of operation? We belittle the average user for not doing so but somehow we are exempt? That is illogical.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    24. Re:This is not news... by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I forgot that the standard operational context for Windows is to have it do 85 things you don't want it to for every 10 you do.

      Guess I've been using OS X and Linux too long where the default is to get what you ask for, and very little else.

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
    25. Re:This is not news... by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. When I boot to Windows I tend to pay a lot of attention to it. Mostly because the OS has screwed me and software for that OS have screwed me. Fortunately I learned a long time ago and I have not been screwed in a long time.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  5. Opt out sneakware crap and Oracle suck. by ITRambo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Oracle, and other company's, opt out crapware installs is one reason that we install Unchecky on all customer's PC's that we service since almost everyone had Ask toolbars, but had no idea how it got installed. This will help the less aware customers avoid crud buildup in their systems, no thanks to a-hole companies like Oracle.

    1. Re:Opt out sneakware crap and Oracle suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      www.ninite.com, even better than Unchecky.

    2. Re:Opt out sneakware crap and Oracle suck. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I hope English is your second language. Meet Bob.

      The plural of company is companies.

    3. Re:Opt out sneakware crap and Oracle suck. by ITRambo · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your correction. English is both my first and second languages, depending on how much sleep I obtain. Cheers.

    4. Re:Opt out sneakware crap and Oracle suck. by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      So you've been up, what, three, four days now?

  6. Re:Hardly anything new by fph+il+quozientatore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real news here is that Java is now officially crapware.

    --
    My first program:

    Hell Segmentation fault

  7. Degenerate vs Innovate by turp182 · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see innovation rather than degeneration.

    It sucks that Oracle owns Java and is really in one market (not Java).

    Yahoo is just trying to stay relevant. I do still use them for email, have been since around 1997.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
    1. Re:Degenerate vs Innovate by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      Learn that the industry moves on. People & popular languages die; just learn to move on. No point in getting sucked into the theology of the previous era.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  8. This is FU by AndyKron · · Score: 1

    And if you don't uncheck the button on the goddamn Adobe update you get to be a goddamn McAfee user. And...

  9. Next Ask Toolbar by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Next they will try to install the Ask toolbar. Sun did this bullshit back in the early 2000's. I am surprised it has taken this long for Oracle to take this step to try to ruin Java.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Next Ask Toolbar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You obviously have not had to install Java recently. They have been bundling the Ask Toolbar (checked by default, and also making Ask your default search provider) for the last few years.

      Honestly, bundling Yahoo is a step up - or at worst sideways. But, it is still criminal that this kind of crapware is enabled by default, preying on the novice users who are not savvy enough to un-check it.

    2. Re:Next Ask Toolbar by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 1

      You obviously have not had to install Java recently. They have been bundling the Ask Toolbar (checked by default, and also making Ask your default search provider) for the last few years.

      Honestly, bundling Yahoo is a step up - or at worst sideways. But, it is still criminal that this kind of crapware is enabled by default, preying on the novice users who are not savvy enough to un-check it.

      AC is right - if this is a change from Ask.com to Yahoo, it is an improvement. If the Ask-bar still gets installed - fuck you Oracle.

      --
      Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
    3. Re:Next Ask Toolbar by in10se · · Score: 1

      They've been bundling the Ask toolbar with the Java installer for years now. It sounds like they are just switching to Yahoo instead - or maybe both. The article doesn't say.

      --
      Popisms.com - Connecting pop culture
    4. Re:Next Ask Toolbar by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Jeez. I actually do Java every day as my job, but I have only been installing it on Linux for the past number of years, so I did not realize this was the case.

      But I said nearly 5 years ago, that Oracle will do it's best to ruin Java. It seems to be relegated to server-side only more and more. (this is the only place we use it as well) The only thing propping up Java is the fact that people do not trust Microsoft, otherwise C# would have taken over the business world by now.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  10. People still use Java? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I uninstalled Java from all of my PCs months ago and I haven't even noticed any difference.

    1. Re:People still use Java? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      You could have done this five years ago. When users realized that java was a defunct trend on the consumer PC.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  11. Re:Google is too wild . . . by ihtoit · · Score: 3, Funny

    maybe try turning safe search back on and not searching with such ambiguous keyword combinations as "giant cock"?

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  12. THIS by MitchDev · · Score: 1

    is a practice that needs to be outright BANNED.

  13. Re:Hardly anything new by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Has been for as long as that Ask.com piece of shit has been snuck in with a pre-selected check box.

    Pretty much as soon as Oracle took over as far as I can tell.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  14. Yeah, for exactly one search by lurker412 · · Score: 1

    Then, I change it back to whatever. It's obnoxious behavior, but hardly the end of civilization as we know it. Move along, there are bigger fish to fry.

    1. Re:Yeah, for exactly one search by Daniel+Hoffmann · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is an evil practice born of corporate interests, just because it could be evilier does not mean we should turn a blind eye to it.

    2. Re:Yeah, for exactly one search by AquaDuck · · Score: 1

      It is an evil practice born of corporate interests, just because it could be evilier does not mean we should turn a blind eye to it.

      Evil? Really? I can see sneaky, sleazy, underhanded, or even manipulative, but evil? Evil is murdering people because you don't like the color of their skin. Evil is shooting young girls in the face just because they want an education. Evil cutting people's heads off. Evil is putting corporate profits before the health and safety of customers or workers. No one is going to die or become ill because they don't notice the check box. I agree that opt-out instead of opt-in benefits Yahoo at the expense of the user, but if we keep using 'evil' to describe any behavior we find disgusting, the word loses its power and becomes meaningless when real evil comes along.

  15. Re:Hardly anything new by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

    They inherited that from Sun.

  16. Re:No Java by Nadir · · Score: 2

    Mac does have Java if you need it.
    Windows doesn't come with Java by default.

    --
    --
    The world is divided in two categories:
    those with a loaded gun and those who dig. You dig.
  17. Blur, Song 2 by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    Woo hoo!

  18. I'm not worried. by Comboman · · Score: 5, Funny

    If Java tries to change by default search engine to Yahoo, one of my 27 toolbars will quickly change it back to Ask.com

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:I'm not worried. by neilo_1701D · · Score: 2

      OMG!!! You're that guy!!!

  19. Re:No Java by ArcadeMan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Default installations of OS X don't have Java anymore, which is why your link exists in the first place.

  20. Re:Google is too wild . . . by Plumpaquatsch · · Score: 2

    maybe try turning safe search back on and not searching with such ambiguous keyword combinations as "giant cock"?

    Have you used Google lately? A couple of years ago they began to also search for "similar" words, including abbreviations and acronyms. Which, depending on the subject, can lead to totally off-topic results. E.g. https://www.google.de/search?q=Wisconsin+Tourism+Federation - WTF indeed. Their search-by-data is also often useless (esp. when looking for older stuff), because most sites now include links to current articles even on ancient pages, which of course drown out the actual content.

    --
    Of course news about a fake are Fake News.
  21. Re:Hardly anything new by petermgreen · · Score: 2

    No, java is something that people want/need which is supplied with bundled crapware that you have to remember to opt out of.

    What TFA doesn't make clear is whether this new yahoo thing will be instead of the ask toolbar bundling or in addition to it.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  22. Re:So long, Chrome. by in10se · · Score: 1

    This isn't a Chrome issue. This is a Java issue.

    --
    Popisms.com - Connecting pop culture
  23. What's the point? by skovnymfe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Chrome won't run Java anymore. Soon IE won't either.

    What exactly are they trying to accomplish here?

    1. Re:What's the point? by gtall · · Score: 1

      Marissa to become another VP in Uncle Larry's Stable of Executives from Other Companies?

    2. Re:What's the point? by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      I have met many Oracle salespeople and she fits the mould perfectly. Young republican hair and clothing style. Uptight. Sleazy. Looks like she either uses you or ignores you if you aren't getting her a sale. And has that I arrived at 6am for work and thus am superior to you regardless of your actual contribution.

      She recently had a kid and I am willing to bet that the kid is being raised by nannies.

      Thus what kind of crap would she give about customers? Customers exist to be exploited for a better year end bonus. Great products are for the weak.

    3. Re:What's the point? by goeken · · Score: 1

      Way to bring politics into this I looked up up and she is listed as a Democrat. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

    4. Re:What's the point? by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      It worked for Mark Hurd.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
    5. Re:What's the point? by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      I didn't say that she was a republican, more that she is dresses like a little miss perfect young republican. I don't really see much difference between the two parties as I judge them by their actions not their words.

      I find that democrats don't actually dress much differently but that republicans are a bit more consistent.

  24. Better than Ask by WoodburyMan · · Score: 1

    Better than Ask. That's All i'm sayin'...

    1. Re:Better than Ask by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      I might argue with you had I visited Yahoo in the last decade.

  25. Re:Google is too wild . . . by thaylin · · Score: 1

    Did you really have to use a .de domain to try and change the output so much? If you use the normal .com domain you get normal results. It is almost as though the German root level does not care much about a state in the US's tourism federation, or the EUs rules on how these search companies must censor results may be in play.

    Even still all the WTF messages are relevant because the acronym was a cause for it to change the name of the federation.

    --
    When you cant win, ad hominem.
  26. I wonder why Oracle are doing this by DrXym · · Score: 2
    The first contact many have with a new product is the installer. So what are companies doing to make a good first impression? Conning them into installing adware / crapware or changing their browser settings. It's insulting, it undermines trust and it cheapens the product by association.

    I got so fed up of Adobe loading their updates will crapware like McAfee that I stopped installing it altogether. Likewise I've avoided other products which have started bundling stuff in their installers. I'm sure Oracle are compensated for promoting Yahoo from their installer but the reputational damage will suffer could be immense.

    1. Re:I wonder why Oracle are doing this by Luthair · · Score: 2

      Because you aren't actually a customer of Oracle. You aren't paying them money and most likely you're using Java to run 3rd party software.

      Just download the JDK it isn't bundled with crapware, or at least hasn't been.

    2. Re:I wonder why Oracle are doing this by DrXym · · Score: 1
      I might not be paying them money directly but I'm certainly making them money. Developers and companies pay Oracle for tools, support, certification, training for Java and they do it because there is a demand for the language. If the brand is cheapened then ultimately it will hurt them in the wallet.

      Same principle applies to Adobe and Flash. They make nothing from the Flash player but its all those eyeballs are what make professionals want to buy the dev tools that they do make money from. Cheapen the brand and it goes into decline.

    3. Re:I wonder why Oracle are doing this by ic3m4n1 · · Score: 1

      Well there are may be like 90% people who just click next, next.
      And if they dont bother to check at that point, they pretty much wont notice/or have clue where that crap came from.

      For rest 10% Oracle says but we give you checkbox to opt out.
      So its like making money from peoples ignorance. But as long as its money Oracle doesnt care.

  27. Disable offers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Surely any self respecting Slashdotter knows about this:
    https://java.com/en/download/faq/disable_offers.xml

    1. Re:Disable offers by Tokolosh · · Score: 1

      The option to suppress sponsor offers is not available in my Java (7.45) control panel. So the option 1 on the site you provided seems to be discontinued. This only increases the dickish factor, or have I missed something?

      --
      Prove anything by multiplying Huge Number times Tiny Number
  28. Yahoo is today's RealPlayer by BringMyShuttle · · Score: 2

    Firefox cut a deal with Yahoo too, not because Yahoo is a better search engine for their users, either because Yahoo gave Firefox money or, well, why else would they do it? http://www.dispatch.com/conten...

    What sucks is Yahoo sucks. I didn't even notice the browser change by the logo, but I did notice it when it gave bad search results. Changed back to Google, and results were accurate again.

    Yahoo, you are the RealPlayer of the search world. File Chapter 5.

    1. Re:Yahoo is today's RealPlayer by BringMyShuttle · · Score: 1

      Google was paying Firefox $300M a year. http://www.reddit.com/r/techno... http://www.computerworld.com/a... Wonder what Yahoo is paying?

  29. Re:No Java by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    Why did you word it differently? Both operating systems have Java available but neither comes with it by default.

  30. Re: Google is too wild . . . by master_kaos · · Score: 1

    Maybe if you spelled it correctly, that would help, instead of an entirely different word

  31. Sign of desperation by funkymonkjay · · Score: 1

    Desperate companies do desperate things. Sad really.
    When was the last time you visited yahoo.com?
    Used their email?
    Used their games or chat?

  32. Stuff that matters? by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

    How is this worthy of a /. post?

    1. Re:Stuff that matters? by owski · · Score: 1

      Because some of us work in IT and need to be aware of this crap to keep it off our networks.

    2. Re:Stuff that matters? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

      Because Dice owns Slashdot, and approves the front page posting of click-bait all the time now.

      You haven't noticed?

      --
      Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  33. Why is this news? by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    1. Ask.com has always been included in Java installations. 2. Yahoo isn't the first to sneak themselves as a replacement search engine. 3. Proper browsers will stop this unless user approves. 4. I can always switch back.

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    1. Re:Why is this news? by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2
      Umm, because it is news.

      How long have you known about Yahoo's deal with Oracle. Forever? Or is this recent? If it's recent, it is news by definition.

      But more likely, you just consider that you are above accidentally installing a toolbar. That's good, but not everyone is. I've had computers to "fix" when people couldn't access their "Facebook" (their name for the entire internet and their browser). Fire up IE, and the screen is toolbars from top to bottom.

      In an effort to help them, it's really nice to know where they got the problem from. So you can help them avoid calling you back in 6 months with a similar problem. Tell them what to look out for.

      See how that works? Recent happening, and helps some of us do our work. News.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  34. Re:No Java by dimeglio · · Score: 1

    Why is this flamebait at the moment?

    --
    Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
  35. Re:Google is too wild . . . by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    Which, depending on the subject, can lead to totally off-topic results

    What is off-topic about those results?

    The organisation in question's website - which is no longer called the Wisconsin Tourism Federation - comes second in the list, and only because you've used google.de. Use its new name, or use google.com, and it comes top.

    Seems like it's working perfectly to me.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  36. Ah, Adobe, How Could I Hate Thee More? by Toad-san · · Score: 1

    Oh .. yeah .. here we go!

    Yep, me too, _this_ close to jerking Java from my system entirely.

  37. Sleazy as fuck by flopsquad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course I want to use a search provider that has to hijack my browser to gain any significant marketshare. Why would I want to use the search engine that works best for me, when Oracle can choose a shittier one for me?

    --
    Nothing posted to /. has ever been legal advice, including this.
    1. Re:Sleazy as fuck by narcc · · Score: 1

      It could be worse, thanks to google, several installers now hijack your default browser!

  38. Re:So long, Chrome. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    One could argue that Chrome shouldn't let other programmes change the search provider.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  39. package manager by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

    It's 2015 and Windows still doesn't have a package manager? Oh wait, it does...

    C:\> choco install jre8

  40. And by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 4, Informative

    Adobe tries to slip in MacAfee on you when you download their pdf reader.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:And by Spinlock_1977 · · Score: 1

      Can't wait to remove the Adobe crapware from my computer too!

      --
      - The Kessel run is for nerf herders. I can circumnavigate the entire Central Finite Curve in a lot less than 12 parse
  41. Re:Google is too wild . . . by BlackPignouf · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you try to access google.com from Germany, it automatically redirects you to google.de.
    If you want the "original" Google from abroad, you need to type google.com/ncr.
    This link should work the same all over the world :
    https://www.google.com/?gws_rd...

  42. Not just Java installers... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I always check the "custom install" option whenever I install any software, and I adjust all the options to do what I want the installer to do.

    .
    imo, anyone who blindly accepts the default installer options gets the malware they deserve.

    1. Re:Not just Java installers... by freeze128 · · Score: 2

      Agreed! If you have used a windows PC to install more than 5 programs, you have learned to *ALWAYS* choose custom install. I don't know if I would say that anyone *DESERVES* malware, but choosing to custom install your program will make you better at managing your own computer, and the world needs more of those people.

    2. Re:Not just Java installers... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

      ... I don't know if I would say that anyone *DESERVES* malware...

      Point taken. It was a poor choice of words on my part. Thanks for the correction.

  43. To the poster by fulldecent · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you're going to include an obscure technology like Java in the article. Could you please explain what it is?

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

    1. Re:To the poster by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 1

      I hope that within the decade that your statement goes from funny to insightful.

  44. Re:Last Gasp of a dying company by narcc · · Score: 1

    Oracle or Yahoo?

    Google Chrome is bundled with other software, like CCleaner and Avast. I don't think Google is dying anytime soon.

  45. More proof... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    That this CEO has no clue at all.

    Nothing like ramming your company down people's throats to get them to like you.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  46. Unchecky helps with this by Coopjust · · Score: 1

    I know that many would ridicule that such a program is necessary/useful on windows, and some others might rather avoid software with bundled crapware checked by default in the installers, but Unchecky is a great, lightweight (less than 1MB RAM) freeware that watches installers and automatically unchecks the boxes for things like offers in the Java installer, Bing toolbar/bing default in the Skype installer, and other unwanted bundled installs.

    I run it as a convenience to not uncheck the boxes manually, but for relatives (e.g. grandma) it's fantastic because it saves me from removing five toolbars every month.

  47. Re:Google is too wild . . . by dave420 · · Score: 1

    It's an example of something completely different to what you were talking about. Bizarre. I think the only point you made is "I don't know how to use Google".

  48. Hopefully, the old pre-opt-out will work by idontgno · · Score: 5, Informative

    In Windows, use the Java Control Panel and select the "Advanced" tab.

    At the very bottom of the list, completely out-of-sight unless you scroll aaaaaaal the way down, in a category called "Beware of the Leopard"... no, sorry, I meant "Miscellaneous"... there's a checkbox labeled "Suppress sponsor offers when installing or updating Java".

    Of course, by default it's not checked. Because money.

    But check it and apply or "OK" the settings change. In the current implementation, this prevents bundling the Ask.com malware with Java upgrades -- it's a pre-opt-out, and you never have to think of it again. (At least, until Oracle decides the option should auto-magically unset itself when the user's not looking. Because money.)

    Assuming this option continues to exist in future Oracle Java versions and is honored for the Yahoo tie-in, this would alleviate the pre-opt-in crapware issue. Big assumptions, of course, because Oracle.

    (Or alternately, don't install Java if you don't actually need it. Or install OpenJava rather than Oracle's.)

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  49. Another Yahoo goodie! by no-body · · Score: 3, Interesting

    On Yahoo Email, there are mandatory ad emails showing on top and one cannot delete those.
    If you click on one under Firefox, a link opens but is blocked.
    Looks the more BS they produce the more desperate they get and produce even more crap.
    Digging their own grave it seems.
    Maybe it has to do with the "upper crust people" beeing control freaks and out of touch with reality when things don't go like they should in their minds.

  50. Mothers don't let their kids run Java ... by userw014 · · Score: 1

    Why install Java on desktop systems anymore - unless you're forced to by some hideous commercial application you're stuck with?

    (For that matter, why install Adobe Flash - unless you just have to watch every cat-video and fail-video there ever way.)

    1. Re:Mothers don't let their kids run Java ... by NJRoadfan · · Score: 2

      Some useful open source projects are written in Java, like DavMail and ADTPro.

    2. Re:Mothers don't let their kids run Java ... by Monkey · · Score: 1

      And Minecraft

  51. Java non-NPAPI plugin??? by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

    Does this mean that Oracle will be producing a Java plugin thats compatible with Chrome???

    Aside from the issues of self-signed certificates and strict requirements on whitelisting this might actually make it possible for me to use Chrome to do my job (which involves connecting to remote KVM/iDRAC/ILO systems which require a Java client).

    Otherwise, yeah no way Oracle, no one is going to install Java any more if they are using Chrome and don't really REALLY need Java (in which case they'll use a different browser).

    In other words, if Oracle doesn't produce a non-NPAPI plugin, then client side Java will be in the wastebasket of history soon; its only a matter of time before its no longer supported in other browsers than Chrome.

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  52. why not just use OpenJDK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Because OpenJDK says to do this

    If you came here looking for Oracle JDK 8 product binaries for Solaris, Linux, Mac OS X, or Windows, which are based largely on the same code, you can download them from java.oracle.com.

    1. Re:why not just use OpenJDK? by Endloser · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that sucks. This looks like a promising alternative for the time being. http://www.azulsystems.com/pro...

  53. Idiots. by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, because tricking people and manipulating their settings without their full acknowledgement is a sure fire way to gain brand loyalty. Idiots.

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  54. Friendly OpenJDK Upstream? by allquixotic · · Score: 2

    Does anyone know if there exists, or can we start, a project like this:

    (1) They distribute binaries for Windows (32-bit and 64-bit). Other platforms would be awesome, too, but Linux already has great OpenJDK support in package managers, so that may not even be necessary. Windows is the platform where it really sucks.

    (2) They have a custom-designed updater that schedules itself to run every so often (say, every 2 weeks); launches; checks for an update; and then *EXITS* if it doesn't find one. If it does find one, it gives the user a simple "Yes/No/Ask Later" prompt: if they pick Yes, it'll silently remove the old OpenJDK version and install the new one; if they pick "No" it'll skip that version and only remind them when the next update comes out; and it'll bug them next week if they click "Ask Later". Once it finishes whatever it has to do, it EXITS, rather than remaining in virtual memory forever like the Oracle Java updater.

    (3) No adware. All components free and open source software. Installer should only depend on FOSS (no InstallShield, etc.).

    (4) Gives user the option to enable/disable Java plugins for each browser detected to be installed on the system, at install-time, and can be configured after install via a config GUI. Default should be to NOT install the Java plugins, since they have had a history of severe vulnerabilities, but users are free to request their installation anyway.

    (5) Installer should come in two forms: a "net installer" that has a tiny size (1 MB or less) and only downloads the requested components at runtime (allowing user to select whether they want the source code, the JDK or just the JRE, etc.), and an "offline installer" that contains the entire kitchen sink and does not need Internet connectivity (for environments behind a restrictive proxy, or no network connection).

    (6) User should have the option to install OpenJDK without admin rights! If they don't have admin rights, stick it in AppData\Local and put the plugins in a similarly user-scoped folder (not possible with IE as far as I know, but should work with Chrome and Firefox). Auto-detect whether the user can be an admin, and only give the UAC prompt if the user's account can actually accept the prompt; otherwise, fall back to "non-admin" install.

    Gee, sounds like if nothing like this exists, I have the requirements / design doc in my head...

    If I disappear in my room for a week and don't emerge until this thing is on github, tell my family and my cat that I love them.

  55. Re:So long, Chrome. by OhPlz · · Score: 1

    One could argue that if users can do it, other programs can too.

  56. When people ask me to help them get java working by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 2

    When people ask me to help them get java working I say no bloody way. My simple theory is that Java in the enterprise might be a good thing but java on the home machine is just asking for trouble. To me Java has a perfect storm of people not wanting it. First is that Java must be regularly updated to keep it safe. But I don't trust these updates to not screw me over in some fashion, either through malware such as this or simply popping up at an inconvenient time. For instance I am often recording video tutorials. There is nothing worse than some software update popup showing up in the middle. Especially if it is one of these focus grabbing popups. But the java update is a total bastard as it keeps turning itself back on after I keep turning it off.

    So I basically danced around my office when I read that chrome and firefox were pretty much killing Java as an extension/addon.

    But adding malware to their install just makes me laugh at how stupid these MBAs are. Yes in the next few quarters they will make lots of money. But how many quarters before people will have significantly reduced their downloads?

    Also for Yahoo, I hate Ask.com for their trashy approach to getting users. Make a great product and then people might come. Fooling them into coming is just scummy. So now people will lump Yahoo in with the various sites that over the years have tried to use deception as their marketing tool.

    For those of you out there all touchy about Java, my comments are not about the Java language, but the java product.

  57. This is really big news by Minwee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think we're missing the real story here.

    The article is suggesting that Java update _actually works_ and is capable of _updating Java_.

    I can't remember the last time that was true.

  58. Re: Google is too wild . . . by Raistlin77 · · Score: 1

    Whoosh...

  59. Not a problem here by JustAnotherOldGuy · · Score: 1

    Thank goodness I don't use Java or have it installed. It's a dog and will never be installed on any PC I use.

    --
    Just cruising through this digital world at 33 1/3 rpm...
  60. It will work, to an extent by Kartu · · Score: 1

    Ok, we know it won't reach out to entire internet.

    Those, who will switch back to google/bing, are anyway not yahoo's customers, so why would they care about annoying them?
    On the other hand, some people might discover yahoo this way and, well, stick with it.

  61. Re:No Java by pubwvj · · Score: 1, Troll

    Because a PC user feels inferior so they used their mod points to make themselves feel big. It happens.

  62. They're already doing this... by mswope · · Score: 1

    I downloaded Java yesterday and saw that it had the Yahoo option already in there and pre-checked for my convenience....

  63. The Will to Live... by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

    The will to live is very strong, stronger than rationalism. A panicked drowning person will try to climb on the shoulders of a would-be rescuer, not caring that this will kill both of them. RIP Java AND Yahoo!

  64. Host on SourceForge! by wardrich86 · · Score: 2

    Since they love offering ads with their installers, why not just save time and effort and have SF wrap the installers for them?

  65. Re:Forced Opt-in by default is ILLEGAL in the EU. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    Microsoft got the snot beat out of them by the EU, they're still accruing fines for forcing opt (with both IE and Media Player, which is probably why (annoyingly!) they're dropping WMC in 10).

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  66. Turning off Java's add-on crapware by taustin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\JavaSoft]
    "SPONSORS"="DISABLE"

    [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\JavaSoft]
    "SPONSORS"="DISABLE"

    The screen with the checkboxes does not even appear.

  67. And every slashdotter's relative called... by Rasperin · · Score: 1

    Why does my computer keep searching using Yahoo! I must have a virus!
    That's just Java... I'll be over shortly to reset it for you and uninstall Java. -_-

    --
    WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
  68. Use Wikipedia Re:To the poster by davidwr · · Score: 1

    It's a given that sophisticated users like those who read Slashdot know that if they don't know something, all they have to do is go to a reliable source, like Wikipedia's entry on the subject.

    I admit, the article was a bit confusing and I didn't see anything about compatibility with modern operating systems, but one thing that was clear is that installing Java is going to bloat your system big-time. I have a big drive, but I'm not sure if I can fit another 143 million users on my system.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  69. Re:Forced Opt-in by default is ILLEGAL in the EU. by kthreadd · · Score: 1

    Forced Opt-in by default is ILLEGAL in the EU.

    Opt-in in the EU is by LAW/Directives to be OPTIONAL by default.

    Another example of American companies not understanding nor giving a fuck about our rights in Europe.

    I hope somebody takes them to the EU courts over these practices. Same with the annoying defaults of installing Chrome on installers.

    Google is already in the courts, time to bring Yahoo in and many others (Valve with steam etc). Apple has been through it with iTunes.

    Another example of Europeans not understanding that their laws don't apply in America.

  70. Re:No Java by PoopMonkey · · Score: 1

    And default installations of Windows have never had java.

  71. Get Even by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Since this could hurt Google's direct line of business, Google should buy PostgreSql, and pump scaling money and promotion into it to eat into Oracle's sales.

    1. Re:Get Even by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      People don't seem to get that Google is not the solution for every ailment in the computer industry. Because Google is a conglomeration of startups, offering services for free, without a single clue about customer satisfaction. Google has no follow through. Its like Apple, with its inability to provide reliable services outside of the box it sells. Google will never buy postgres, then try to stick it to Oracle. Oracle needs to be a "threat" to Google's market plan before Google will react, and Oracle will never succeed in a manner where it can pose such threat to Google. If a competitor came out with a marginally better search engine, Google would be dead as a profitable company. They'd have to count on their self-driving car or "internet of things" to bail them out.

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  72. Re:No Java by ArcadeMan · · Score: 1

    So the real question is, why are we still talking about Java at all?

  73. Some relief by chilenexus · · Score: 1

    Settings > Control Panel > Java > Advanced tab
    Scroll down to the Miscellaneous section (bottom of the list)
    Populate the checkbox labeled "Suppress sponsor offers when installing or updating Java"

  74. Re:No Java by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Because it is.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  75. Re:Hardly anything new by MachineShedFred · · Score: 1

    I guarantee it will be in addition.

    Why screw the user over once for money, when you can screw the user twice in the same sitting for more money?

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  76. Checked by default by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

    so if you aren't looking out for it, you might unwittingly find yourself a Yahoo user.

    Isn't that how all Yahoo users become Yahoo users?

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  77. Last gasps by turp182 · · Score: 1

    These sort of deals, especially for companies like Yahoo and Oracle, do reek of a end of sorts in the near to mid-term future (2-5 years for Yahoo, quite a bit more for Oracle due to entrenchment).

    What sort of end? I don't know.

    --
    BlameBillCosby.com
  78. Re:Last Gasp of a dying company by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

    Yahoo. Oracle is the dinosaur that's going to need a decade to die, like IBM.

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  79. Re:I guess it's time for fuck you Marissa Mayer /r by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

    Lord knows, no one bothers to read Slashdot...

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  80. Re:It's a VIRUS, my son has destroyed my computer. by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

    Blame minecraft, they require you to use that java shit.

    --
    There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  81. Re:Google is too wild . . . by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    I get a bunch of results about wisconsin tourism federation changing their name because they've finally figured out WTF and WTF are the same.

  82. Firefox by markdavis · · Score: 1

    >" they'll be asked to make Yahoo their default search engine on Chrome (and Internet Explorer, for what it's worth)"

    I guess that means Firefox is the best choice... yet again!

  83. Re:So long, Chrome. by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    Oh look, somebody else who apparently doesn't understand how computers work. How do you expect to stop a program[me] from changing a setting in another program[me] when they both run under the same privileges? Chrome has to store its default search provider configuration somewhere. The Java installer can edit that "somewhere" and change the stored configuration. Even if Chrome stores its search configuration in "the cloud", the installer could just use Chrome's cached credentials to change the configuration there.

    The only way to change this is if apps don't have the ability to interact with each other's data (something like the isolation/sandboxing used for mobile apps). Anything else, any setting that you (the user) can change, any software running on your behalf can change (whether you want it to or not). I'd expect readers of this site to be able to grasp that, but it keeps coming up so maybe not...

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  84. Fire dishonest CEOs. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    It's amazing to me how much Slashdot readers hate discussing business management. Discussing business management is often painful, but I think we should accept the pain and get the job done. For example:

    Marissa Meyer is not competent, in my opinion. A dishonest or sneaky CEO should be fired. This is the 2nd recent nasty manipulation Meyer has arranged. This is the first:

    Has Firefox been Embraced and Extended with the intention of Extinguishing it by Microsoft? Mozilla Foundation now gets most of its money from Microsoft. Microsoft pays Yahoo. Yahoo pays Mozilla Foundation to make "Yahoo search" (actually Microsoft Bing search) the default search engine in Firefox. Most people don't have the technical knowledge to know how they've been manipulated, or how to restore the default search engine to Google search. Marissa Meyer's sneakiness is damaging Firefox's reputation.

    The Thunderbird and SeaMonkey Composer GUIs have been damaged, apparently deliberately. Every time you do a file save, the newer versions of both ask for a new file name, and don't suggest the last file name chosen. The damage was reported several months ago, but has not been fixed. Is that another example of Embrace, Extend, Extinguish? People who feel forced away from Thunderbird may choose Microsoft software to replace it. Is that what Microsoft is trying to accomplish?

    Change in subject: It's amazing how fast computer programming languages die. Pascal died in 2 years. Java is almost dead because the U.S. government issued a very negative warning.

  85. Re:Google is too wild . . . by KGIII · · Score: 1

    toke == puff

    Example: Puff on that joint a little harder, there is no reason to worry about the rest of us.
    Example: Take a toke off this joint, it is some killer weed.

    Yes I have smoked weed before - and I inhaled. I do not smoke it now, it just makes me tired, stupid, and hungry.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  86. Re:So long, Chrome. by KGIII · · Score: 1

    You mean the Chrome that uses this same exact method to get installs? I am not sure that I understand your logic. The company you are changing to is guilty of BEING the installed malware that was bundled with other application installers. This is not a well-reasoned statement if you ask me, but you didn't. Also, you can easily prevent this from happening to you by telling the program to not do it as its default action or by paying attention when you are installing things which is something you should be doing anyways.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  87. Re:So long, Chrome. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Oh look, somebody else who apparently doesn't understand how computers work.

    Oh look, someone else who loves to belittle people on the internet who aren't quite as knowledgeable as them. Not very original...

    Fine, then: Chrome could at least make it less easy for other programmes to alter its configuration. Can't it monitor its files for externally-applied changes and revert/inform? What about encrypting the configuration on disk (at the cost of inconveniencing the user, or at the very least inconveniencing other programs who want to alter it)?

    I'd expect readers of this site to be able to grasp that, but it keeps coming up so maybe not...

    Forgive me, oh wise one, for not meeting your lofty expectations. I shall go back and resit the Slashdot entrance exam immediately.

    There's really no need to be such a douche to someone for a fairly off-hand comment just because they don't know everything.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  88. Re:What I post's nonsense dave420? by Anonymous+Cow+Ward · · Score: 1

    Do you just sit in front of a computer all day refreshing his /. profile to check when he posts new comments?

    --
    Examine even your most deeply held beliefs. Nobody is always right.
  89. One good thing about Windows 10... by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

    A friend is currently playing around with the latest alpha^H^H^H^H^H insider preview of Windows 10 (wow is that thing unstable...), and when he installed Chrome and tried to set it to default, a pop up appeared saying that you can only change the default application by going into the control panel and changing it explicitly.

    I have to admit that this is a good thing. With so many applications hijacking file and URL associations, it's inevitable that the option needs to be removed from them.

  90. I could have played it better by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I regret not making the link read

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/ind...

    Hint: When "&oldid=" is used, "title=" is ignored. In fact, it doesn't even have to be present.

    These all refer to the same thing:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/ind...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/ind...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/ind...

    https://en.wikipedia.org/w/ind...

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  91. Re:So long, Chrome. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    the fuck did I just read??

    Opera Mini is a portable, non-persistent browser (as in it doesn't cache anything - it's designed for embedded systems). Ergo, there's little room (or excuse) for sideways installing.

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  92. Re:So long, Chrome. by KGIII · · Score: 1

    I believe my comment ended up threaded under the wrong person. I, myself, am to blame. I stand by my pointlessness. After all, it is what I must do. Sorry about that - it was meant to be threaded elsewhere.

    I am a big fan of Opera, I am using it now, and think the beta has come a long ways. The dev beta is also nice. Also, Opera is not guilty of either being installed maliciously nor of bundling malicious software into its installers. I have been an Opera user for a long time and really like their software. It would be nice to get them into the various distro repositories though but that is another point for another day. Then again, it is not like I am not off-topic already.

    Finally, again, my sincere apologies for not threading my reply properly. I am not sure what I was thinking. I can not even blame beer or drugs. I can only blame either stupidity or lack of sleep. I think I will prefer the blame goes to the latter.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
  93. Re:So long, Chrome. by ihtoit · · Score: 1

    ok, we've all been there. :)

    --
    Political debates have me rolling my eyes so much I think I got optical whiplash. I should sue. - Foamy The Squirrel
  94. Re:Hardly anything new by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    How would it work?
    Yahoo is just a default search setting (if it's like yahoo when you sometimes see it as default in firefox), Ask.com I believe that's malware that hijacks the search setting no matter if you try to change it back. In layperson's words we might as well call it a virus or in old fashioned computer speak, a trojan.

    The Ask.com trojan would run and set "Ask" as the search provider, thus pushing Yahoo search out of the way. It would be a rather lousy deal for Yahoo.

  95. How to fight it? by clicker666 · · Score: 1

    I've repeatedly sent complaints to Adobe and Oracle over the years telling them that they are being underhanded in the "pre-checking" of the tick boxes - ie - requiring users to opt out. I actually have had to go around and instruct users to read their screens and not blindly click next. If anyone has solid strategies to ensure that only clean versions of Flash, Acrobat Reader, and Java make it to the desktop I'd love to see them. We're a not-for-profit of less than 200 users, so cost is an issue.