Slashdot Mirror


Bitcoin's Value Plummeted Overnight and No One Knows Why (slate.com)

Jacob Brogan, writing for Slate: While the Western Hemisphere slept, Bitcoin plummeted. Just after midnight Eastern Time on Friday, the cryptocurrency was valued at a little over $15,000, on the digital currency exchange Coinbase. At that point, it was already well below the $19,783 all-time high it had hit the week before. Over the course of the night, Bitcoin began to decline erratically, occasionally spiking but following a general downward trend. Around 9:22 a.m. Eastern, it hit a temporary floor, valued at a mere $10,400. By that point, it had declined more than $6,000 from its short-term peak the morning before, having lost more than one-third of its value. Bitcoin wasn't the only currency hit by a sharp drop. Tech Crunch's Jon Russell reports that most other prominent cryptocurrencies also fell, including Ethereum, Litecoin, and Bitcoin Cash (which is, confusingly, separate from Bitcoin proper). As Russell notes, it's hard to say why this is happening, "in the same way that nobody knows exactly why bitcoin's price has [shot] up from a touch under $1,000 at the start of the year."

267 of 461 comments (clear)

  1. it is known why by iggymanz · · Score: 5, Informative

    It was overvalued and a bubble. Next question?

    1. Re:it is known why by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The way I see it, this looks like the smart money pulling out and doing so in the middle of the night as to avoid people seeing the drop, panic selling their bitcoin in response and thus triggering and even bigger drop in the average sell price.

      --
      "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
    2. Re:it is known why by Hylandr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Using bitcoin as currency is about the same as using traditional stocks as currency.

      I really think bitcoin has no real value outside of providing temporary peaks and valleys to trade between. Using an unstable commodity as a measure of trade-worth is far more complex for businesses to adopt at scale, which pretty much relegates it to the small guy looking to move small amounts of currency discreetly.

      I can't imagine this will ever go mainstream at scale unless the value can be made consistent.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    3. Re:it is known why by MangoCats · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to work for a (thinly) publicly traded penny-stock company, every year near Christmas its value would tank, usually to around 30-50% of where it was in the October-November time frame. What it was mostly attributed to was people reviewing their portfolio at the end of the year and selling their holdings for "whatever the market will pay," which is what drives the price down initially - then a little bit of panic selling follows that. I think some people do it to book their loss (or gain) before the tax year ends.

    4. Re:it is known why by MangoCats · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This will never go mainstream at scale as long as the underlying transactions are so fabulously expensive. I read a recent analysis that actual blockchain verified trades can cost as much as $20 to execute (when accounting for the capital and power costs of all the people involved in competing for the initial hash solution).

      Even if a trade only costs $0.20, that's still too high to compete with the likes of Visa and MasterCard - at scale, and the 2.75%+ that CC companies charge is going to have to creep into mainstream cybercurrency transaction schemes as well to cover practical costs of fraud, customer service and investor dividends in the real world.

    5. Re:it is known why by Hognoxious · · Score: 5, Funny

      Up and up the bitcoin goes,
      beats dollar and the rouble.
      All at once it drops like shit -
      Pop goes the bouble!

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    6. Re: it is known why by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Especially if you've been doing any type of day trading (which I suspect is a lot of Bitcoin).

      You can be taxed on gains that you need actual cash to pay (if I buy at 1, sell at 2, buy at 1.50 and hold, I the on the 1 dollar in gains (I think)).

      When the end of the year comes, one needs to sell some to cover that tax.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    7. Re:it is known why by religionofpeas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The solution is to bundle large amounts of transactions together using the Lightning Network, and then intermittently settle them on the main chain. This is being worked on. First test runs have been successful.

    8. Re:it is known why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not night everywhere.

    9. Re:it is known why by Artem+S.+Tashkinov · · Score: 1

      If this comment had been modded "funny" I'd have understood the fellow /.'ers. Too bad Bitcoin's bubble has been busted at least a dozen times already and it's still ... alive and kicking.

      The sentiment for the bubble here at slashdot has never ceased to amaze me. I wonder what you'd have said in the early days of the Internet and dot com's. Both surely seemed to be a bubble. Both have prevailed though a lot of companies didn't make it. But before you compare dot com's to Bitcoin, remember that it started almost 10 years ago -- too long of a time to remain alive, no? Why the hell is this pyramid scheme still going on? Maybe there are forces and things we fail to understand and appreciate at the moment and your kneejerk reaction to everything made by the people without governments, their oversight and total control might not be pertinent any longer?

    10. Re:it is known why by Train0987 · · Score: 1

      That is common with penny-stocks as people sell at the end of the year to lock in their tax losses.

    11. Re:it is known why by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Wait a second, are you saying a thinly traded penny stock was a going concern? I call bullshit.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    12. Re: it is known why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Here's what happened.

      Some large speculators dumped a bunch of coin, or a bunch of small transactions got rolled into a few large ones (i.e. Lightning network).

      This resulted in automated trading programs to start dumping coin, and it snowballed.

      Then the $10k threshold hit and the bots started buying.

      Currently it's back up to $13k but it's anybody's guess what will happen as the news spreads.

    13. Re:it is known why by ladislavb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Middle of the night??? You do understand that bitcoin trades 24/7 across 24 different time zones and that the world stretches beyond your backyard, right?

    14. Re:it is known why by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      Still way more than it was a month ago. Hardly a bubble.

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    15. Re:it is known why by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      yes those are bubbles, just as tech market has had them. do you have a point? my point stands, bubble and overvalued. It is also has become a pyramid scam because of its inadequate architecture

      the internet is a collection of technologies not a market. I was on the internet when it was called "ARPANET" decades ago and there were no markets based on it

    16. Re:it is known why by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2

      Traditional stocks are coupled to actual assets (and debts) as well as speculation on the total value of the company. In some cases dismantling a company for its assets produces value.

      Some companies have been rolled up because their owned real estate was worth more than the value of operating the company.

    17. Re:it is known why by dougTheRug · · Score: 1, Offtopic
    18. Re:it is known why by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

      I'll bet you 1 BTC at any value that the holdings of BTC are nowhere near uniformly geographically distributed. As long as it's night in the places you're most worried about selling off and tanking before you recover your money, it counts as the middle of the night.

    19. Re:it is known why by Crashmarik · · Score: 2

      Oh you mean like Theranos ?
      Homejoy ?
      Quirky ?
      MySpace ?

    20. Re:it is known why by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      day ain't over yet

    21. Re:it is known why by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, Bitcoin's only real utility is as way to transfer value with minimum accountability. Handy if you perhaps have a pallet or two of currency that you can't explain to the taxman and you want to convert it into tangibles like a Ferrari, a trophy wife, and a yacht. You buy Bitcoin in your country of residence (how?), cash it out in some handy excuse for a country where taxes are nonexistent and the mordida is light and go on your way. But there are probably lots of ways to do that that do not involve stuff that loses half its value overnight.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    22. Re:it is known why by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 2

      No, but most of the people with the money to invest in it are sort of located in North America and Western Europe so the best time to dump your holdings, which isn't going to be instant if you're dumping a lot, is when people in those places are catching z's.

      --
      "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
    23. Re:it is known why by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 2

      I'm fully aware of that, it's just that most of the people trying to make money on investing in it are located in North America and Europe. Hell, I wouldn't be that surprised if North America currently makes up over 50% of the market for the monopoly money. Thus the best time to dump a significant amount of Bitcoin, which isn't going to be exactly instant, is when people in the biggest market/markets are most likely to be catching z's.

      --
      "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
    24. Re:it is known why by magarity · · Score: 1

      verified trades can cost as much as $20 to execute ... that's still too high to compete with the likes of Visa and MasterCard

      The Mastercard fee on a transaction of last week's BC price of $19K would be a LOT more than $20.

    25. Re:it is known why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If it popped how did it rebound half of that back in a day? It just momentarily deflated.

    26. Re:it is known why by jrumney · · Score: 1

      My next question will be: now that the roughly $20 per transaction mining cost is not being subsidised by inflation, can bitcoin survive? Or is it now doomed to a downward spiral to its true worth from here?

    27. Re:it is known why by jbmartin6 · · Score: 2

      To whom are they selling if the "dumb money" is all asleep?

      --
      This posting is provided 'AS IS' without warranty of any kind, implied or otherwise.
    28. Re:it is known why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From what I've seen the higher the amount of the transaction, the higher the amount of the fee, and the FASTER it confirms against the blockchain network.

    29. Re:it is known why by mikael · · Score: 1

      The "whales" started moving currency around. People convert their savings into Bitcoins when their local currency is unstable. Then they convert it back again once things settle down.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    30. Re:it is known why by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Who are you selling to if everyone in the market is catching z's?

    31. Re:it is known why by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      Has any solution been found to the problem that the amount of processing power needed for transactions is exploding, leading to entire nuclear power plants needed to conduct them (a little overexaggeration here).

    32. Re:it is known why by jon3k · · Score: 1

      So you think it was a coordinated effort by "them" to sell all of "their" bitcoin. Your tinfoil hat might be on a little too tight.

      In other news bought back in around 12,400 and I've already seen a very nice increase (already back over 14,500).

    33. Re:it is known why by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      You can trade BTC In China? That isn't what Beijing says... Unless, of course, you want to go spend some time in a small cell with that other fellow who ran a VPN service in China.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    34. Re:it is known why by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      Haven't you been paying attention. All the stories were about people in Korea and elsewhere in Asia putting their lifesavings in bitcoin.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    35. Re:it is known why by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, this looks like the smart money pulling out and doing so in the middle of the night as to avoid people seeing the drop, panic selling their bitcoin in response and thus triggering and even bigger drop in the average sell price.

      Assuming you can find someone willing to buy your coins while they're also seeing the value drop.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    36. Re:it is known why by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      People convert their savings into Bitcoins when their local currency is unstable. Then they convert it back again once things settle down.

      Right.... because Bitcoin is far more stable.

      --
      No sig today...
    37. Re:it is known why by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      Wow, it sounds like you could have easily become a billionaire with this knowledge.

    38. Re:it is known why by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Overvalued relative to what? Bitcoin has already recovered from the drop. Just some simple profit taking. Bitcoin bubbles regularly, it never fully pops back to a lower value and it always "bubbles" to new heights later. Eventually there won't be enough completely new investment to fuel those big swings and they'll settle into mini-swings, either way it is deflationary and over the course of time the progression is an upward trend.

    39. Re:it is known why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Who are you kidding? Fucking China owns Bitcoin.
      Stop being so western-egotist.
      China have more billionaires than the rest of the planet, at that.

    40. Re:it is known why by dmt0 · · Score: 1

      No, but most of the people with the money to invest in it are sort of located in North America and Western Europe so the best time to dump your holdings, which isn't going to be instant if you're dumping a lot, is when people in those places are catching z's.

      False, most of the buyers of bitcoin are in Japan and South Korea

    41. Re: it is known why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If you have a flux capacitor and get up to 88 mph, all you need is some lightning and you can jump to the future and your bitcoin transactions will be complete.

    42. Re:it is known why by drew_kime · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a (thinly) publicly traded penny-stock company, every year near Christmas its value would tank, usually to around 30-50% of where it was in the October-November time frame.

      Just in time to fuck over employees waiting for their bonus.

      --
      Nope, no sig
    43. Re:it is known why by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Ask the guy who tried to do VPNs in China just how well that worked out for him... Sure, you can get away with it for a little while, but when you're caught - well, 5 years in a Chinese prison is just about a death sentence.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    44. Re:it is known why by arth1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If it popped how did it rebound half of that back in a day? It just momentarily deflated.

      Gaining half back of a major drop is not rebounding. Net, it's still a huge drop.
      I'd be hopeful that it's reached the time when enough plebs had been swayed, and it would be time for the bubble to burst, but I don't think we're there yet. There are still enough idiots who haven't jumped on this fad. I give it another two months. And then the unwashed masses will cry for the entrails of someone. (Except themselves, for being criminally gullible, of course.)

    45. Re:it is known why by Holi · · Score: 1

      What? most people invested in bitcoin are in Asia not America.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    46. Re:it is known why by Holi · · Score: 1

      Fast is relative, maybe if you compare to a bank transfer, but Bitcoin is in no way fast regardless of your fees.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    47. Re:it is known why by Holi · · Score: 1

      Wow, I love the misinformation all the anti bitcoin people have. South Korea is HUGE in crypto currency as is China. they hold far more then America does.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    48. Re:it is known why by Holi · · Score: 1

      Dude, Look at where Bitfinex and Binance are located, you are talking out of your ass.

      --
      Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
    49. Re:it is known why by LordKronos · · Score: 2

      Except the author in the story got his timeframe entirely wrong.I went to bed shortly after midnight US eastern time, and by then, I had been watching the crash happen for the last 4 or 5 hours. On the west coast, it would have begun about 4 or 5 PM. It started around $16k, and by the time I went to bed, it had already fallen into $13k range, and then bounced back up into the $14s. Sometime later it continued falling again. Looking at the charts, as far as I can tell it only fell to a bit below $12k, not $10k as the author suggests, though I suppose it's possible there were some sales in the $10k range (bitcoin is a very inefficient market...there are routinely $3-4k gaps between the various exchanges, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if there were some people moving big money back and forth between the exchanges capitalizing on these discrepancies).

      So I'm not sure where the author gets the $10k figure from, but as for his timeframe and claim that it all happened overnight while we slept, I suspect he just woke up and heard the news, went back and checked the charts to see what he missed, and didn't understand what UTC meant when he did so.

    50. Re:it is known why by plopez · · Score: 1

      That's good old dead cat bounce.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    51. Re:it is known why by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      Funny, Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao is based in Hong Kong as is Binance and he's talking in this interview about post-Beijing ban of cryptocurrencies. Hong Kong is NOT China. Now, I know to most ignorant Westerners like you, China/Hong Kong/Taiwan/South Korea/Thailand is all "Asia" and all "China", but the reality is that Hong Kong is NOT China. Hong Kong has its own laws, legal system, passports, visas, currency, language (Cantonese - not officially supported in China), and they even drive on the wrong side of the road.

      Likewise, Bitfinex is a brand of iFinex. And who is iFinex? Well, iFinexis a British Virgin Islands company and operates out of Hong Kong. And what did we just cover above? HONG KONG IS NOT CHINA. Different laws, different currencies, different passports (for example, no Visa needed for an HK citizen to come to the US; one required for a Chinese national, and a Chinese national needs a special visa to go to Hong Kong), etc. Neither Bitfinex nor Ninance are based in China. Period. Full Stop.

      Who's talking out of their ass? I welcome your apology.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    52. Re:it is known why by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You buy BTC in your country of residence by arranging a deal. Let's say that I want to evade capital controls on exporting money, but there are no controls on exporting, say, scrap iron. You want to move $10M of assets out of your home country. I'm your BTC man; I take your local currency and give you BTC, when I've already arranged a deal with Mr. X to sell me $12M worth of scrap iron for the price. You sell your BTC for whatever currency you want. I take my $12M of scrap iron and sell it for a profit after chartering a cargo ship.

    53. Re: it is known why by reanjr · · Score: 1

      That's actually baked in to the original protocol. Right now mining gets you transaction fees plus a reward of something like 6.5 Bitcoins (worth about $90k). As the network ages, the Bitcoin reward disappears, so the cost to mine a block will drop by about $90k in the long run.

    54. Re:it is known why by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Most of the traditional stocks are companies with significant capital wealth that would limit any drop. Individually, they won't drop more than a certain percent, they won't drop to zero.

      Failed fiat currencies can easily drop to zero.

    55. Re:it is known why by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Hong Kong has its own laws, legal system

      In theory, yes. In practice, no: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    56. Re:it is known why by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That seems to be a temporary state. Governments didn't anticipate that their citizens would go trading money for a mention on the internet, so they didn't check for it. Now that they realize that's a thing, their interest is increasing. For example, the US IRS demanding transaction records from the bitcoin exchanges.

      You could use bitcoin with minimal accountability only because it was obscure. Now that it's caught on, it actually has maximum accountability.

    57. Re:it is known why by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Wow, you managed to pick some unfortunate examples. There was indeed an Internet bubble (more than one), and it actually chugged along in relative obscurity until the first .com bubble when the web was about ten years old. Once that one popped there was some more responsible growth until the web 2.0 bubble... roughly ten years later. About ten years further on, with multibillion dollar valuations for "social media" companies that seem to be mostly vapour... Internet bubble 3.0?

    58. Re:it is known why by lkcl · · Score: 1

      The way I see it, this looks like the smart money pulling out and doing so in the middle of the night as to avoid people seeing the drop,

      ... middle of the night... for which timezone? remember, this is a *world-wide* phenomenon not one that is controlled by the USA or even one stock exchange with 9-5 (day) trading.

      anyway, don't worry about it: all the people doing futures trading are screaming "BTFD! BTFD!" right now [buy the f*****g dip...]

    59. Re:it is known why by lkcl · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine this will ever go mainstream at scale unless the value can be made consistent.

      that happens when people *stop thinking in the exchanged currency*. when you buy something at the grocery in USD, do you think, "oh darn i've been ripped off by this seller, i'm really worried... because the RMB is strong, right now"??

      there already exist communities and individuals *in the united states* who pay their rent, utility bills, car insurance *and* their garbage collection... *in bitcoin*. they're mostly in New Hampshire (motto, "Live Free Or Die"), and they're mostly people who have been following the Free State Project for a long time. stores in Keene, NH, has one of the highest acceptance rates for bitcoin payment in the county, with onl one other city nearby exceeding them.

      i went to porcfest 2016 and it was great fun, i loved the fact that you could buy a tornado potato *with bitcoin*. absolutely *everybody* had a little QR code on the side of their stand. they just put up with the variance, and you know what? sometimes you make 10%, sometimes you lose 10%: they don't care, as it averages out in the end.

    60. Re:it is known why by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      If you are selling life jackets: it pays to rock the boat.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    61. Re:it is known why by michelcolman · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure anyone's opened the box yet.

    62. Re:it is known why by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Well, it's better than Venezuelan Bolivar...

    63. Re:it is known why by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't even think you're exaggerating. Haven't they passed the electricity usage of Denmark a while ago?

    64. Re:it is known why by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
      I see your Wikipedia link and raise you one. In particular, this portion:

      Under the principle of ‘one country, two systems’, Hong Kong has its own legal system, distinct from the Law of the People's Republic of China, and based on the combination of English common law (developed in local cases) and local legislation codified in the Laws of Hong Kong. Hong Kong has a common law system, whereas the PRC has a civil law system with socialist roots. Only a small number of PRC laws apply in Hong Kong by virtue of stipulations in Article 18 and Annex III of the Basic Law. The separation of the Hong Kong legal system from the PRC is guaranteed constitutionally until at least 2047.

      That's not to say that China doesn't way overstep its bounds - but HK pushes back. And in HK, trial by jury is still the standard; China has no jury (just a panel of 3 judges). Those are pretty big differences...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    65. Re:it is known why by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      So then why can you run a BTC trading company in HK, but not in China?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    66. Re:it is known why by callahan2211 · · Score: 1

      Why does bitcoin have any value? Is it because there are only a certain number of them? Why is this CC better than any other CC?

      --
      "There are no gods, no devils, no angels, no heaven or hell. There is only our natural world. Religion is but myth and
    67. Re: it is known why by Veretax · · Score: 1

      Maybe people wanted money for football bowl game tickets and lodging and airfare or possibly they just wanted money for Christmas to travel?

    68. Re: it is known why by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Among the very most searched for items on Google. Says enough.

    69. Re: it is known why by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Assuming you can find someone willing to buy your coins while they're also seeing the value drop.

      Right, because buying after it's gone up makes more sense...

    70. Re: it is known why by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      always

      Your inability to comprehend the meaning of this word greatly explains the entire stock market.

    71. Re:it is known why by doccus · · Score: 1

      It was overvalued and a bubble. Next question?

      Sorry, not a bubble popping. It's clearly the same kind of market manipulation gold went through before the top investors spent billions on it. by manipulating the price. This way they ensure that tons of nervous investors will dump their holdings, making them available (remember therre's a limited supply) but as well, the price drop ensures they can buy twice as much before it surges back upwards. If you have any cryptos, HANG ON to them (Not to be taken as professional investment advice, just an honest opinion)

    72. Re:it is known why by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      No! I've been told they are the same country! Next you're going to say the judicial system, immigration systems, and currencies are different, too! Why, it's almost like THEY ARE DIFFERENT COUNTRIES from a functional standpoint!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    73. Re:it is known why by wallsg · · Score: 1

      They probably had record sales.

      Of their own stock.

    74. Re:it is known why by goukaradi · · Score: 1

      You are correct. Rebalancing tax sales sir.

      Some years they go up in January, some they fall further.

      There are also patterns vis a vis leap years and elections that correlate. :-)

    75. Re:it is known why by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's what I meant by theory. Go tell it to the abducted people - if you can find them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    76. Re:it is known why by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      it will plunge down again soon, it is overvalued as an investment because of its bottlenecked architecture and where the major holders are

    77. Re: it is known why by Wdomburg · · Score: 1

      If you believe coinmarketcap.com it's at $16,441.40, while Yahoo Finance has it at $15,994.11. Both are pretty far off "fully rebounded" consider it peaked over twenty grand.

  2. Profit taking by XXongo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Profit taking, I'm sure. That's what often happens when a stock rises quickly; the people who got in earlier sell out to cement their profit.

    1. Re:Profit taking by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe peeps liquidated some coins today to so some last Christmas shopping this weekend.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Profit taking by phalse+phace · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I agree, it's profit taking.

      It's like how investors pulled $14.5 billion out of the market this week.

  3. Valuating bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You're trying to understand why a valuation based on bullshit...plummeted?

    Please tell me common fucking sense still has value today...

    1. Re:Valuating bullshit by leonbev · · Score: 1

      I'm really hoping that the OP was being sarcastic. Anyone with half a brain or some investing experience knows what a pump and dump scam is when they see it.

  4. Scheme by hunter44102 · · Score: 1

    This is a typical scheme where millionaires sell a bunch of their coins(or stock) to get everyone to jump out and then they buy the coins back much cheaper. Looks like it has recovered some already

    1. Re:Scheme by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      With something as volatile and devoid of underlying value as cryptocurrency, I doubt this is a smart strategy. With a bit of bad luck you'll trigger a 'bank run' i.e. massive panic selling. After that it is unlikely that there will be sa strong recovery, and your remaining coins will be worth bugger all.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  5. Re:Maybe it has something to do with the 4 day wai by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I still have two transactions in limbo, from EIGHT DAYS ago.

  6. Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Everyone knows why Bitcoin's value plummeted. It's because Bitcoin doesn't have any value other than the belief of people in Bitcoin. What I said about Bitcoin is generally true for the Dollar too, but in the case of the Dollar at least the U.S. Government will take it for your tax payments. Nobody has to take Bitcoin for anything.

    People confuse creation of money with creation of value. Value is food, materials, information, useful work. Dollars/bitcoins are unreliable media for exchange of value, not the value itself. Creation of $300B in bitcoin won't help the world to feed one more mouth.

    Speculators jumped on it as a get-rich-quick scheme to make money from other speculators who would - they hoped - not time the market as well as they did. But inherent in this strategy is that all speculators will cash in on their speculation, driving Bitcoin back to low values as they abscond.

    1. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 1

      Value is food, materials, information, useful work.

      Wait... Finding all of those low-valued hashes wasn't useful work?

      I'm crestfallen.

    2. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      At least you can do something with newly-found prime numbers. Perhaps there would be public benefit to a cryptocurrency where the computation results in the publication of some more useful datum, rather than just being a complete waste of power. While this might be useful work, it would not assign any particular value to the coin.

    3. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      You can say the same about gold though. People have valued that for millennia. You can't eat it. You can't make anything useful with the amount that a typical person might have. Most people who own it keep it in vaults.

      So why is gold valuable, but bitcoin isn't? Personally, I think gold's value is based on a bizarre delusion as well, but it's a delusion that's been going on for some time.

    4. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by epine · · Score: 1

      Creation of $300B in bitcoin won't help the world to feed one more mouth.

      Do you know what is really weird? A Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist writes a book with no endorsements.

      One such book is Pay Any Price by James Risen (2014).

      His thesis—which he introduces through the least straight-line narrative he could reasonably concoct—is that after the Iraqi treasury was looted of a billion dollars (valueless paper, further despoiled with Saddam's portrait) by his son, Qusay, the American government became terrified about their ability to feed the liberated Iraqi population, and so came up with a scheme to ship some $12 billion in $100 U.S. bills from East Rutherford to Baghdad (filling five expensive transports with this worthless paper in the process).

      Wouldn't you know it, this whole enterprise involved shockingly lax controls, and there were 35 convictions back in America after the fact for excessively tasting largess (accounting for but a pittance of funds which disappeared into the liquidity void).

      People act on their expectations of the future, and the behaviour is sometimes strikingly different if the expectation is one where "worthless" paper (or a similarly serviceable proxy) is in short supply. The value of trade that hasn't happened yet is not so easy to dissect from the system of trade as you would pretend to make it.

      So, no, your currency won't make a fish out of water, but it might serve to distribute an actual fish into the mouth that most benefits.

      If the U.S. government had shunted $12 billion in abstract currency to Baghdad, fewer people would have found themselves thumbing through big wads of $100 bills, and more of it would have disappeared to an even blacker final destination.

      Apparently, operation currency lift also involved twenty-seven 747 cargo planes of freshly printed dinars.

      I have formed no fixed idea about this book from the one chapter that I've read so far. Most of the sources are unnamed, there is no scholarly end-matter, just an afterword about how the author has become a persona non grata of the U.S. intelligence establishment, and the odd tidbit of redemption:

      Risen Cleared on Labeling CIA Contractor a 'Con Artist' — 2016

      "The only evidence in the record that Montgomery points to which might create a genuine issue of fact are his own, vague representations that the technology worked," the 74-page opinion states.

      In 2011, the Department of Justice invoked the state-secrets doctrine to keep details of the government's deal with Montgomery under wraps in a separate lawsuit in Nevada.

      Montgomery cites the purported classification of the information as a reason to withhold production.

      Judge Contreras said that he has "serious reason to doubt that the software is, in fact, classified," but that its purported sensitivity is irrelevant Montgomery's case.

      "Whether because the information is classified or because Montgomery gave it away to the government without retaining a copy, the simple fact is that the software, and therefore any ability to confirm whether or not it works, is absent from the record," he wrote.

      Vapour all the way down. Hard to assess. Very much like the topic at hand.

    5. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      In a post-apocalypse society gold would probably revert to being the preferred metal for tooth fillings. It's soft and inert. In an industrial society there are lots of things done with gold every day. One is wiring integrated circuit dies to the package leads, another is plating connections (because it's conductive and does not corrode).

    6. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'll tell people now, so I can point at that when it's at the bottom and say I told them then.

    7. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Gold had perceived value long before dentistry, let alone electronics.

      If it's so useful in industry, why are we keeping it locked in vaults rather than using it? I cant imagine people are holding it there because they know if there's an apocalypse they'll be able to sort out dental cavities.

    8. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      I thought they quit using gold for IC connections in the 1980s when even thin coatings started to cost too much. I'm pretty sure the gold colored wiring one sees every now and then on electrical circuit boards is some weird beryllium alloy. But yes, there are, or were at least until very recently, said to be places where gold jewelry was (is?) popular because folks don't trust the local currency to maintain purchasing power. .

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    9. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by Orgasmatron · · Score: 2

      Generally, on a mass-produced board, it is real gold. But only on permanently exposed connectors, like the fingers for the PCI-e socket, and in an extremely thin layer. Literally nanograms of gold per board. If the board is going immediately to population and soldering, they won't bother doing that to the device pads.

      Some small-run boards are done with ENIG too. OSH Park, for example, does Electroless Nickel Immersion Gold with purple solder masks. Looks fantastic and has a long shelf life.

      Gold is still very important in places where people need a visible display of wealth. India's upper middle class, I'm told is one example. Lower middle class who aspire to move up tend to buy, but don't display it as much. Again, so I hear.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    10. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      The bitcointalk forums are littered with the corpses of accounts of people who had gained some credibility in some other realm and couldn't resist the urge to display the ignorance they wallow in outside of that narrow domain.

      One of my favorites was Nagle, who made an ass of himself repeatedly in the 2011 timeframe, prompting this quote from an actual economist:

      Nagle made some interesting points (e.g. about SEC, GLBSE) and I think these have merit. But he still does not understand what Bitcoin actually is, he's comparing it to stocks, which can lead to misleading conclusions. But I don't blame him, understanding the consequences of Bitcoin is very complicated, I have been researching it for about half a year and find out something new almost every day.

      On the other hand, Bitcoin may still yet fail, however it wouldn't be for the reasons typically presented by Bitcoin detractors.

      Replace "stocks" with "dollars" and remove the bits about making interesting points and he could have said it about Perens.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    11. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by belthize · · Score: 1

      Exactly.
      Neither the US Dollar nor bitcoin are actually based on anything of worth.

      The dollar's valuation is based on the fairly simple premise that the US economy in the near future will look an awful lot like today's. It has a lot of mass and doesn't move fast so it tends to be stable.

      Bitcoin's valuation appears to be based on the premise that it went up yesterday so it will probably go up tomorrow. Folks buy, the price goes up in response and folks slap each other on the back congratulating themselves on their powers of prediction. At some point it's valuation will be based on: it went down today it must go down tomorrow at which point folks will panic.

    12. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2

      That doesn't mean the dollar can't crash. I don't think the fact that the US government accepts USD for tax purposes has any effect on the dollar in the short term. If the dollar crashed to 1% of what it was tomorrow, it would mean that I could pay 1% of the taxes I would otherwise have had to in terms of value. I wouldn't necessarily be happy about this if I had a bunch of money in a bank account, but most of my money goes towards child care home improvements, and a mortgage.

      In the long term, it would mean that employers would have to pay their employees 100x as much to get them to do the same work, as well as goods and services costing 100x more, and within a year this would lead to people paying roughly 100x higher taxes.

      Paying 40% (or whatever %) of your income to the government in taxes is independent of the value of 1 unit of local currency.

      The fact that I am forced to pay my taxes in USD does not even require me to hold USD. I simply need to convert some assets to USD just prior to paying my taxes (either in april or every 2 weeks). It would be theoretically no different than if the US government only accepted bitcoin as payment for taxes.

      There certainly is speculation, in bitcoin. But I think bitcoin is actually more similar to gold than USD. The supply of USD is controlled by an authority. If the price of USD is too high for you to "buy" you don't have an option to make your own USD as a check on the price. If the price of gold gets high enough, at some point it becomes cost effective to start panning for gold, and if the price drops it stops being cost effective depending on how efficient your method is.

      It's possible for the price of bitcoin or gold to drop to 0, but for the time being there is quasi a cap to the price of bitcoin which is the cost of mining. It makes no sense to buy a bitcoin for $20K if it can be mined for $10K of electricity. So $10K becomes the new cap (sortof)

      There is the issue of mining difficulty increasing as more blocks are found which can (And I think clearly did) drive this cap higher (so I guess it's not a real cap in that it's not static), but it is a cap in that the market couldn't really bear a $1M bitcoin, unless there was a lot more mining happening.

    13. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Gold is pretty. It's rare, shiny, doesn't corrode, and is easily worked with primitive tools. Gold was valued for decoration. That value made it a good candidate for money because you had to use *something*, but not the only one: also copper, silver, platinum, palladium, all shiny, reasonably easily worked and useful as decoration.

    14. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by swillden · · Score: 1

      in the case of the Dollar at least the U.S. Government will take it for your tax payments.

      And anyone else you owe will (must, by law) take it as repayment as well.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    15. Re:Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      There are alternatives to gold that look indistinguishable. People are attracted to it because it's expensive, not the other way round. If it's so valuable as a decoration why is it kept in vaults rather than on display?

      I mean I don't disagree with crypto-currency being worthless. I'm just surprised people don't feel the same way about other worthless stuff.

    16. Re: Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      A creditor is required to take dollars for debts, but nobody is required to take dollars for goods and services.

    17. Re: Everyone Knows Why, Silly! by swillden · · Score: 1

      A creditor is required to take dollars for debts, but nobody is required to take dollars for goods and services.

      That's what I said :-)

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  7. This isn't a crash by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1, Interesting

    When Bitcoin crashes properly it'll lose 90 to 100%+ of it's value.

    --
    Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    1. Re:This isn't a crash by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      yes, gaining 50% in 30 days is a 'crash'.

  8. Bagholders, start selling! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's no "reason" because there's no rational valuation mechanism. Cryptocurrency without a mechanism for value stabilization is a scam. Blockchains are clearly useful for certain kinds of distributed trust problems, but Bitcoin is merely one instance that was always marketed as a cryptocurrency but has zero use as a transaction mechanism. Nobody wants to use a currency that may be worth 20% more, or 20% less the next day.

    The only valid use case for Bitcoin I've heard described is as an improved version of the offshore banking system. In other words, a mechanism for rich people to launder and hide money. Of course, a cryptocurrency with value stability would sure as hell be a lot more useful and trusted for even this grey market purpose.

    Ultimately, Bitcoin's value is driven by grey and black market activity. Money laundering, cybercrime, etc. Investing in Bitcoin is essentially investing in a residual claim on this underbelly of the economy, in the same way that regular fiat currencies are residual claims on national economies, with a healthy dose of mindless speculation and bubblemania thrown into the mix.

    1. Re:Bagholders, start selling! by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      Nobody wants to use a currency that may be worth 20% more, or 20% less the next day.

      If nobody wants it, the price will settle down.

    2. Re:Bagholders, start selling! by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What I said was nobody wants to use it as currency. There are plenty of people who want to buy it and sell it as speculators. They are just betting that there is a greater fool down the road.

      Equities actually represent a claim to a potential future income stream. Some may be very boring and predictable, some may be super speculative and risky - but there is some meaning to them.

      Gold and oil have value as commodities because there are alternative uses of these commodities. So yeah, there is plenty of speculation, but you can take gold or oil and "do stuff" with it.

      Bitcoin is an investment asset without any meaning sincere there is still no alternate use. Currency use has vanished to near zero while speculation, hoarding, and cybercrime make up essentially all of the transactions.

    3. Re:Bagholders, start selling! by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      How an alt-coin called VeChain - It's a bonified Ponzi scheme.

      VeChain Economic Masternodes and Nodes:

      A VeChain Economic Masternode/Node offers stability to the ecosystem and acts as a distribution of power and privilege within the blockchain’s economy. VeChain Economic Masternodes/Nodes also have representation within the ecosystems voting periods. For an address with at least 10,000 VET/VEN held, a node represents one vote within the majority consensus. Unlike Authority Masternodes, Economic Masternodes/nodes do not produce blocks and ledger records.
      Mjolnir Masternodes Second highest-incentive Nodes)

      Token possession: 150,000 VET and above

      Incentive received: receive the highest reward among VeChain Economic Nodes.

      Cannot be upgraded More information on Mjolnir Masternodes soon
      Thunder Nodes (Higher-incentive Nodes)

      Token possession: 50,000 - 149,999 VET/VEN;

      Incentive received: receive the higher Thor incentive;

      Can be upgraded; More information on Thunder Nodes to come.
      Strength Nodes (Medium-incentive Nodes)

      Token possession: 10,000-49,999 VET/VEN;

      Incentive received: receive the medium Thor incentive, however, still more than none-node holders;

      Can be upgraded;

      More information on Strength Nodes to come.
      Holders with less than 10,000 VET tokens receive default incentive.

      https://www.reddit.com/r/Crypt...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  9. It will be interesting to see.... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

    Bubble + North Korea hacking and theft + loss of confidence probably all play a roll

    North Korea Hacking War on Bitcoin Exchanges Is Part of “Biggest Global Sting”

    The bankruptcy of a bitcoin exchange has been blamed on North Korean hackers, prompting concerns for the cryptocurrency’s future. Around $72 million worth of bitcoins were stolen from the South Korean exchange Youbit in April, before a second more recent cyber heist forced the exchange to shut down on Tuesday. Cryptocurrency exchanges from neighboring South Korea—which account for 15 to 25 percent of world bitcoin trading—appear to be the main target of the hackers, with the country’s largest exchange platform, Bithumb, hacked in July. Other Seoul-based bitcoin exchanges, including Yapizon and Coinis, have also been the target of cyber thieves suspected of being from North Korea this year.

    Bitcoin exchange collapses after second cyber attack in a year

    Bitcoin fails its test as a haven in times of global turmoil

    North Korea bitcoin WARNING: Kim regime hacking cryptocurrency to fund nuclear weapons

    --
    much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    1. Re:It will be interesting to see.... by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You've never really bothered to look into this, or even ready much of the Slashdot stories on it, have you? Your ignorance is almost complete if that is what you believe.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  10. Its not that hard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    There was excitement that 2 major mainstream exchanges were going to start trading Bitcoin futures. That suddenly was going to give Bitcoin legitimacy and credibility. Its the best thing since sliced bread. Everyone jumped on board and it rocketed. Now that the futures have started trading, people are looking around and seeing that the world is still the same.

    Sell the news.. back down it goes...

    There was a little drop after the CBOE started trading futures because of "sell the news" but it was tempered by hope that the CME opening would shoot it back up. Now that both events are past there's nothing to look forward to except organic growth (hopefully).

    What did it for me was when that Tea company pivoted to blockchain and went up 2x. If that's not a sign then I don't know what is...

    All a company has to do to 2x their value is to >>say they're going blockchain? come on....

    1. Re:Its not that hard... by PPH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Futures. And options. Particularly the ability to sell short without a position in the underlying asset (naked shorts).

      Options allow an investor to effectively buy an insurance policy on the movement of an asset's price. A short position is a bet that your asset will go down. You cover yourself against the losses. Like buying insurance on your house. But if you don't own the underlying asset (or didn't borrow it), it's like your neighbor buying insurance on your house. If enough of your neighbors do this, I'll guarantee that your house will burn down sooner or later. It's what happened to mortgage backed securities in 2008.

      The SEC tried to put a stop to that. But given a brand new asset class that they really don't understand or can't track, expect antics to ensue. Once the shit stops hitting the fan, expect the SEC to move to register and regulate Bitcoin and it's trading. And then it's allure will be gone.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Its not that hard... by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      I rightly claimed on Dec 7 that BTC went parabolic. There was far more irrational exuberance than more traditional markets with morons taking out mortgages on their house to push the price up even further but it was plain as day what was going on, and what would happen soon thereafter. Odds are BTC will now bounce a few points higher as people jump in on what they perceive to be a sale. From there it will run in wild but increasingly tightening oscillations sideways for a time as ownership consolidates before the money figures out which way to take the price next. If it keeps smacking a resistance (high price) with higher lows each bounce, there's reasonable odds it'll run higher. If it's the opposite, hitting a support (low price) with lower highs, odds are good it'll start running down. If lower highs and higher lows, it's anybody's guess. Regardless, I wouldn't expect a quick resolution on future direction. Might wish to stock up on shares of antacid manufacturers and drug stores though.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    3. Re:Its not that hard... by vtcodger · · Score: 1

      "It's what happened to mortgage backed securities in 2008."

      The rest of your post seems right, but what happened to MBSes was a bit different. It's had to describe, but basically, MBSes were pools of mortgages that were carved up into "Tranches" with varying risk. The highest risk tranches could be bought cheaply because it was assumed that the underlying mortgages would default sooner or later. Purchasers were betting on when the defaults would cut off their revenue stream, not if. The low risk tranches had high prices because they were assumed to be safe. The problem was that the assumed risk profile turned out to be seriously wrong and many of the "safe" tranches failed.

      Here's a link that explains it. http://analytics-magazine.org/...

      Or type 'planet money' and 'toxie' into your favorite search engine. First hit from Google is https://www.npr.org/2010/05/21... It's a fun read and it makes it pretty clear why pretty much nobody understood those monstrosities. (Kind of like cryptocurrencies in that respect)

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    4. Re:Its not that hard... by PPH · · Score: 1

      MBSes were pools of mortgages that were carved up into "Tranches" with varying risk.

      CDOs (collateralized debt obligations). Packages of these tranches bundled into securities.

      the assumed risk profile turned out to be seriously wrong and many of the "safe" tranches failed.

      The bottom tier CDOs wouldn't sell. And the banks didn't want them. So they bought CDSs (credit default swaps), which are a kind of insurance on the default of securities, bundled those together with the stinker CDOs and sold them as synthetic CDOs. The idea being that the combination of 'bad' mortgage tranches with the insurance would magically make a low risk security. But some smart people started buying CDSs against securities they didn't own as a way of shorting the market. In the end, each dollar of CDO had something like six dollars of insurance written against it. And the insurers, like AIG couldn't make good on the policies.

      If you want a good run-down on the collapse, read The Big Short. Or watch the movie and pay particular attention to what Anthony Bourdain explains happens to fish that doesn't sell.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  11. For a right wing nut job... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    that's a pretty sane thought. What gives? ;)

  12. Noise by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    The same thing can be said for day trading in individual shares, options, et cetera. What determines the price of a share, if there isn't any news? Noise. They're trading on noise. And now there's suddenly a trend, and most follow it.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:Noise by plopez · · Score: 1

      Troll? Why? Time and time again this has been proven true.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  13. The reason is pretty clear to me by Snard · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course, it is time travelers from the future, cashing out before the inevitable collapse in 2 weeks. Of course this needs to be done in a careful and coordinated fashion, to avoid the inevitable positive feedback. Now the trick is whether they will be able to return to the future, since the early decline in the price might affect the funding that created their time machines.

    --
    - Mike
  14. Re:I don't care by plopez · · Score: 2

    At the height of the tulip craze people were purchasing tulip *futures*. The were purchasing the grandchildren or great-grandchildren of a current high value tulip. Also options as well.

    Same as it ever was.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  15. I Am Going To Blockchain by cstacy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Holy Crap! I am going to blockchain my 3D printed autonomous crypto drones with AI in the agile cloud! It will be bigger than web scale!

    1. Re:I Am Going To Blockchain by plopez · · Score: 4, Funny

      Be sure to dockerize it :)

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:I Am Going To Blockchain by Aaden42 · · Score: 2

      But do they have machine learning????

    3. Re:I Am Going To Blockchain by Miser · · Score: 1

      ... with synergy!

    4. Re:I Am Going To Blockchain by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      You forgot the bio-informatic nanotubes.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  16. Re:It's called faith. by rogoshen1 · · Score: 1

    then it might actually be useful as a medium of exchange.

  17. Transaction speed by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    Bitcoins take like a week to transfer, right? What price do you get when you sell one, the price at the time the transaction starts, or the time it completes?

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    1. Re:Transaction speed by lucaiaco · · Score: 1

      Bitcoins take like a week to transfer, right? What price do you get when you sell one, the price at the time the transaction starts, or the time it completes?

      The time it completes.

    2. Re:Transaction speed by plopez · · Score: 1

      When the transaction is closed. I hope you didn't buy in, that is a very basic business question. Please educate yourself before diving into anything.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    3. Re:Transaction speed by religionofpeas · · Score: 2

      You trade on an exchange, and those trades are done off-chain, i.e. instantaneously.

      And if you trade person-to-person, then you just negotiate a price and time, like for any other product you want to trade.

    4. Re: Transaction speed by reanjr · · Score: 1

      That's completely false.

    5. Re:Transaction speed by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Who the hell exchanges a bitcoin in person? That sounds like an excellent way to get stabbed.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    6. Re:Transaction speed by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      Obviously I am asking because I have no intentions of jumping into that pit of madness.

      But your comment and the price insanity makes me think a whole lot of people did.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  18. Before anyone asks... by omnichad · · Score: 2

    The only reason it didn't plummet further is because of how long these transactions will take to process. Everyone's waiting to see where it all settles.

  19. Re:Maybe it has something to do with the 4 day wai by plopez · · Score: 1

    except for the trades booed by some Big Daddy. "Of course sir, to the front of the line"

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  20. Very few control most of the system by foxalopex · · Score: 1

    Actually there's been articles that suggest something like 40% of all bitcoins are held by a small rich crowd of about 1000 users who have more money than common sense and they tend to move simultaneously. So maybe that small rich group is attempting to cash in by selling all at once at the cost of everyone else.

    1. Re:Very few control most of the system by religionofpeas · · Score: 1

      40% of all bitcoins are held by a small rich crowd of about 1000 users

      The reason is that they've held on to those coins since the beginning. These people aren't trading, and they are not panicking.

      maybe that small rich group is attempting to cash in by selling all at once

      Why would anyone cash in while prices are falling, let alone all at the same time ?

    2. Re:Very few control most of the system by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

      Why would anyone cash in while prices are falling, let alone all at the same time ?

      Out of fear that the price will fall below the basis they bought in at and won't rise again, IE crash.

  21. CoinBase? by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

    Where is coinbase HQ? And will the bank-run scene from "It's a Wonderful Life" be enacted there?

  22. Pork Bellies by sycodon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Bitcoin is no different than Pork Bellies.

    Except it makes lousy bacon.

    --
    When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    1. Re:Pork Bellies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bitcoin is no different than Pork Bellies.

      Except it makes lousy bacon.

      It is very different than pork bellies.

      Pork bellies have an intrinsic value. It's food. You can eat it. That gives it a value. Bitcoins, not so much.

      I heard an economist during the housing bubble point out that you could rent a house for substantially less than it would cost to buy it. He said we were in real trouble, and he was dead on. The rent value was the real value - the value that reflected its actual value.

      Most of us will always pay five bucks for a pack of bacon. So that's its floor as a commodity value. Bitcoin has none.

      Some could argue the dollar also has none, but that's another discussion.

    2. Re:Pork Bellies by iggymanz · · Score: 3, Funny

      BITCOIN sandwich . Bacon, Italian dressing, Tomato, Cheese, OniON

      Tangible asset has intrinsic value and you feel good after it's gone

    3. Re:Pork Bellies by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

      The floor on US Dollar value is that they don't serve very good bacon in tax prison. As long as it can keep me out of prison & buy good bacon, I'll be long on USD...

    4. Re:Pork Bellies by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Oblig. Futurama: The wise investor has a sandwich-heavy portfolio. [Zoidberg eats sandwich] Oh, no! - I'm ruined!!

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    5. Re:Pork Bellies by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      You sir, win the Internets for the day! BRAVO!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    6. Re:Pork Bellies by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      People can eat pork bellies. The only intrinsic use for bitcoin is...

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re:Pork Bellies by Revek · · Score: 1

      I had to post here to remove a mistaken moderation.

    8. Re: Pork Bellies by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Your economist argument sounds strange. Paying for the house supposed to be more, because you are eventually going to get a house.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    9. Re:Pork Bellies by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Pork bellies are a commoodity and can be use as food. There is no equivalence to cash, and especially none to experimental crypto currencies.

    10. Re:Pork Bellies by gnasher719 · · Score: 2

      Bitcoin has some intrinsic value, though, so long as the blockchain is maintained. What follows isn't an example I came up with; it's an example that I once read, and found intriguing at its very least.

      Bitcoin has no intrinsic value whatsoever. All that a bitcoin is is evidence that someone wasted a large amount of electric power to mine it. If any western country should get a green government, they might change their laws to put anyone owning bitcoins into jail.

    11. Re:Pork Bellies by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Dammit, by the time I get my restaurant open, it'll be too late to steal your idea.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    12. Re:Pork Bellies by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > Pork bellies have an intrinsic value. It's food. You can eat it. That gives it a value. Bitcoins, not so much.

      Why do we all have to sound like hungry orcs here? Does the internet have intrinsic value? You cant eat it, can you ?

      And why do you think intrinsic value a good thing for money to have ? It turns out bacon does not make a great currency system.

    13. Re:Pork Bellies by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > I'll be long on USD...

      Going long on something designed to lose value is slightly dumber than just burning your possessions in a great big bonfire. The USD is designed to prevent people from going long on it by punishing that behavior. Keynesian economics values spending so much that it discourages savings.

    14. Re:Pork Bellies by arth1 · · Score: 1

      And why do you think intrinsic value a good thing for money to have ? It turns out bacon does not make a great currency system.

      Stocks for companies that are part of the bacon production chain is indeed used as trade instruments. Individual pieces of meat are not valuable (for long), but the system for producing the meat is.
      "Money", as in universal currency, no. Bacon futures are not that.

      What's important for a monetary system is that it has to be backed by something that makes the users trust it. Whether it's gold, or a relatively stable government with the power and willingness to protect the currency.
      Hope and greed can fuel investments short term, but are bad backers for currency compared to trust.
      The only trust Bitcoin provides is in the already completed transactions (as long as 51% is avoided). But nothing provides trust in future value, nor in the ability to make future transactions.

    15. Re:Pork Bellies by doccus · · Score: 1

      People can eat pork bellies. The only intrinsic use for bitcoin is...

      ...to buy or sell pork bellies since it's unlikely that jeweller with your potential engagement ring will accept a pickup truck full of pork. Doesn't fit in the till so well (!)

    16. Re:Pork Bellies by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin has some intrinsic value, though, so long as the blockchain is maintained.

      That word does not mean what you think it does.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re: Pork Bellies by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Or[1] if you're out of grapeshot fire them at the enemy. I read a short story where some bandits did that, forget where.

      [1] Pun accidental, I swear.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re: Pork Bellies by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      I'm not racist at all, an african in the jungle can use Bushmeat instead of Bacon and make a fine BITCOIN sandwich

    19. Re:Pork Bellies by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin may well have immanent value, but it has no intrinsic value. Theres no *substance* to the thing. Its just an idea.

      I mean, apologies if i sound like a philosophy grad, but I am one, and the idea of "intrinsic value" in a currency annoys the hell out of me. We long ago abandoned the labor theory of value (and possibly are poorer for it, but thats another discussion), but even the current definition of 'value' as utility is a bit nonsensical, if you really think about it. Where does the usefulness come from? What reaction within its molecules sprung for the this usefulness. Nothing, its just an idea. Its a thing we've made up. Money is pretend. And since nobody seems to have come up with with a better thing to pretend about so we can organize resources and labor (Hell even the two bitterly opposing methods of economic organization modernity sprung forth, capitalism and socialism both agree you probably need money) were stuck with this pretend.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
  23. Why? by phantomfive · · Score: 2

    "in the same way that nobody knows exactly why bitcoin's price has [shot] up from a touch under $1,000 at the start of the year."

    He doesn't know, he's ignorant. The reason it's shot up is because wall street banks started marketing bitcoin to their customers, and now every two-bit 'investor' wants a piece of the action. It's entirely because of marketing, that's why the price went up.

    It will go up more because there is still so much hype around it, and the hype is growing. If the price drops, people will say, "This is an ideal time to get in."

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Why? by Luthair · · Score: 1

      I'd say tis more the constant shilling of people holding bitcoins who've been performing a pump and dump for several years. Unfortunately news agencies haven't done due diligence and often interview these bozos for bitcoin stories without proper disclosure of conflicts of interest as they would with traders. Minimally if most articles had noted that currency creators allocated themselves huge amounts of currencies the average person would have immediately had alarm bells ringing.

  24. Re:No One Knows Why by bitpyr8 · · Score: 1

    I'm glad my Treasury Notes don't bounce up and down like that, although the ways things are going that may be coming.

  25. In the investing nomenclature .... by dasgoober · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'ts known as a Pump-n-Dump.

    a lot like what I did to your mom....

  26. Should be pretty easy to find out why by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    So, it went down and no one knows why, and also they're saying no one knows why it went up. I think that if anyone really wants to know why, it's very easy to solve this.

    Find someone who bought Bitcoin, and ask them.

    For example, if you want to find out why it went down, find someone who was paying $15,000 per BTC, and ask "why were you longer willing to pay $15k? What new information came to light that made you realize it was worth only $10k (but still a fuck-ton more than $1k)?" and then just see what they say. Listen.

    Similarly, if you want to find out why it went up, find someone who was paying $10,000 and ask "Why was 1 BTC worth that much? Would you pay more for a bitcoin? $12.5k? 15k?" and just see what they say.

    The people doing this, are the ones who are thinking about how many dollars it's worth and making decisions. Just ask how they make the decision, and you'll have your answers.

    (WTF, why is everyone staring at me like I said something utterly naive? I don't get it. ;-)

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  27. It was because of Slashdot by jader3rd · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't recall Slashdot having a bit coin story yesterday. Bitcoin felt ignored and wanted to do something to get attention again.

  28. Bitcoin up over 50% over the last month. by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

    *Yawn* this is just Bitcoin being Bitcoin.

    Buy what you can afford to lose (Slot Machine/Cigarette/Beer money); then don't look at it for at least a month.

  29. Alternate Theory by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Smart money manipulating Bitcoin so it can buy in.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Alternate Theory by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buy on the dip people! A top economist forecasts one Bitcoin will be worth one hundred million trillion dollars in three months time!

      /s

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    2. Re:Alternate Theory by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      You laugh but you could have bought on the dip, it's already back up to $14.5k again.

      It actually seems like a regular enough pattern with BitCoin you should just buy whenever you see a dip like that, because it usually precedes some large gains.

      Of course, it may go down forever. But there seems to have been a tipping point in support that the low it sunk to today is a kind of base... unlike a currency, that support comes from around the globe, not a single country.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    3. Re:Alternate Theory by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The "whales" (rich folks who bought large numbers of coins) who caused the bubble are pulling out, the blood bath is only going to get worse as the fall causes more people to sell ad infinatum. It will likely crash below $1000 unless they can convince enough suckers to buy into the market to arrest the drop.

    4. Re:Alternate Theory by rwa2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Smart money manipulating Bitcoin so it can buy in.

      Yep. Google "How to short b..." and several explanations will just pop right up!

    5. Re:Alternate Theory by david_thornley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spend only what you can afford to lose. Up until now, the trend has been increasing value, and it will likely continue for a while. At some point, it will crash, and it will be difficult to cash out then.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    6. Re:Alternate Theory by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      Because nobody knows when the crash will come, and shorting stuff is dangerous. Unless you can hedge your bet, you can lose an unlimited amount of money shorting.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    7. Re:Alternate Theory by arth1 · · Score: 1

      You laugh but you could have bought on the dip, it's already back up to $14.5k again.

      Except that you have to find buyers. Right now, those are the gullible johnny-come-latey's, and there are fewer of them every minute. Give it time, and there can't be any more buyers.
      Except for deflation, there is a limited liquidity to invest in this. The influx must dry up, like with every bubble. It doesn't take magic to see that it's inevitable.

      What do you do when you can't find a buyer?
      What does that do to the value?
      Sell before then, is the obvious answer. That won't help the ones who buy what you sell, and they will be screaming for blood. Yours. And I'll look the other way.

    8. Re:Alternate Theory by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Instead of blabbing like a moron about how people should put their money where their mouth is and short it, why don't you educate yourself on how shorting works first? Shorting is extremely risky. Even if you are absolutely correct that it's going to zero, even a very brief spike in value could cause you to get margin called and lose everything you've invested before you get the opportunity to realize a gain on when it crashes to zero. Shorting is almost always a foolish gamble, even when the "investment" itself is a foolish gamble.

    9. Re:Alternate Theory by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Because nobody knows when the crash will come

      If they don't know anything, then perhaps they shouldn't be spouting off nonsense. Just saying it will "eventually" crash, is meaningless, since anything is likely to happen eventually.

      and shorting stuff is dangerous.

      You can "short" bitcoin with limited downside risk, using options and/or prediction markets.

    10. Re:Alternate Theory by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      why don't you educate yourself on how shorting works first?

      Why don't you read the citation I provided above ... which explains why everything you wrote is wrong.

    11. Re:Alternate Theory by LordKronos · · Score: 2

      Your article should be called 5 ways to "short" bitcoin, as only the last one is actually shorting. The other 4 are not actual shorting. The first one isn't even remotely close to shorting. Margin trading is just trading where your funds are backed by a loan. I'm not even remotely sure why it's in that list, as you profit when the stock goes up. The ones that do resemble shorting (from the aspect that you can profit when the price drops) are also very risky because you have to know the precise timeframe in which the fall will happen.

      In short, your linked article invalidates nothing I said

    12. Re:Alternate Theory by Cederic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You seem very angry that people are identifying this bubble as a bubble, without being able to predict when it will burst.

      I put my money where my mouth is - not by shorting bitcoin, but by refusing to risk my principle by investing in the first place.

      If I didn't think it was a bubble I'd buy.

    13. Re: Alternate Theory by reanjr · · Score: 1

      So, your argument is buyers are dumb because they think the price will go up. You're smart, but you won't short it because you think the price will go up. Hmmm...

    14. Re: Alternate Theory by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      So... a new definition of "smart" that we're previously unfamiliar with.

    15. Re:Alternate Theory by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      That wasn't covered in my "American Popular Culture 101" at Lubyanka Training College.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    16. Re: Alternate Theory by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      No, my argument is that shorting is a foolish game to play, because even if you are 100% correct about where it winds up in the end, you could still lose everything you invested because it took a slightly different path to get there. Regular investing doesn't have that risk. Even if it crashes to zero and then eventually recovers,. you will still get your expected return as long as you didnt sell during the crash. But with shorting, if it spikes to 10 times the price, you get margin called and cant cover it, and then it crashes down to zero, you still lose out because you were forced to liquidate during the brief spike.

      That's my point. I keep seeing this over and over and over again on slashdot. "put your money where your mouth is and short it". It's always said in a manner that implies shorting carries no risk if you are right about the impending crash so you might as well short it. That's not true, and it's a moronic challenge to make.

  30. Welcome to my country... by gwolf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Nobody wants to use a currency that may be worth 20% more, or 20% less the next day.

    Inhabitants of many Latin American countries have clear memories of the country's currency plummetting overnight to ~60% of its previous value. In my lifetime, it has happened at least three times (and losing 10% overnight? Oh, too many to count).

    Of course, nobody wants to save in national currencies then... But it's not like we have much of a choice!

    1. Re:Welcome to my country... by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Indeed! When a country's currency crashes you often see people informally using other more stable currencies to do business. A popular one is the US Dollar, specifically because it doesn't undergo wild fluctuations in value.

    2. Re: Welcome to my country... by reanjr · · Score: 1

      They move it into dollars because dollars are fungible and liquid. The price stability is a bonus, to those with a crashing national currency, the price is rising. Bitcoin just rises quicker.

  31. Re:Maybe it has something to do with the 4 day wai by Lobachevsky · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Coins are not lost if the transaction isn't processed. The sender still owns the coins until the public distributed ledger says otherwise, which it won't until the transaction is confirmed and included in the block chain. The protocol has a "replace-by-fee" (RBF) where you can just re-create a new transaction with a higher fee than the old unconfirmed transaction and the new transaction, once confirmed, becomes the fate of the sender's coin, and the old transaction, if it ever gets processed, will be rejected as that coin has already been spent.

  32. Re:The machine is bipolar by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

    But the line between (feigned) ignorance and shill is still pretty clear if you know what you're looking for. Clearly no one can know *why* until OP sells off their holdings, then it'll be crystal clear why.

  33. Re:The high frequency traders of stock market fame by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

    The one benefit I can see to the slowness of transaction resolution on Bitcoin is that it makes it useless for HF trading. If you have to wait days for your trades to clear OR pay a huge transaction fee to jump the line, it's a lot harder to cash in on sub-penny swings to rook investors who are more hops away from the exchange than you are.

  34. Rather than buying bitcoins... by LordHighExecutioner · · Score: 1

    ...please invest $ 22.95 for this book.
    It is well worth the cost, and - if you understand the logic behind financial bubbles - you will spare plenty of your money in the future.

  35. Re:Bitcoin worth by Aaden42 · · Score: 1

    Government fiat currency will always have one fixed intrinsic value: People with guns will come and lock you up if you don't pay them the correct amount of it every year. As long as fiat pays taxes, it's guaranteed to be worth something. BTC, not so much...

  36. Because it has NO value? by mhkohne · · Score: 1

    Bitcoin, like everything else, is worth whatever someone will pay for it. Since the recent nuttiness surrounding it means that it's effectively ONLY useful for speculation, what did people EXPECT was going to happen?

    The Greater Fool theory only goes so far - eventually you run out of Greater Fools and the price goes back down.

    It's REALLY not complicated, folks. Trying to ascribe meaning to this kind of shit is no more sensible than planning your year based on goat entrails.

    --
    A thousand pounds of wood moving at 300 feet per minute. Don't get in the way.
  37. Re:And no one knows why.. by stooo · · Score: 1

    demand and supply

    --
    aaaaaaa
  38. BTC Futures will turn BTC into Fiat Money's slave by SigIO · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is something you guys should understand about Wall Street (particularly Goldman Sachs a.k.a. The Vampire Squid) getting into the cryptocurrency futures market. You would think on the surface, if you write (or go short) a Gold, or Oil, or even Cattle contract, that you have to come up with the goods when the futures contract matures. However, there is the little discussed option of "Cash Settlement". If you can't meet the obligations of the futures contract, you can simply pay the owner of the contract what those goods are worth in US Dollars. The markets tout this as good thing for all market participants, but in reality, it is a gross perversion of the market in general. It effectively turns your Cattle, or Oil, or Gold market into a US Dollar market.

    And now they're doing the very same thing to the BTC market. When people are short BTC futures and have to come up with the goods, they don't have to worry about spiking the spot market looking for BTC. They just have to shell out USD. And the Powers That Be have LOTS of USD to spend on either side of that trade.

  39. Bullshit by stooo · · Score: 2

    Bingo !

    --
    aaaaaaa
  40. Re:Maybe it has something to do with the 4 day wai by AuMatar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Great. So I'm a local electronics store. I sell someone a laptop for .1 BTC. Fair deal. That transaction is queued for a few days. He wants to walk out of the store with the laptop today. Either the store takes a huge risk of fraud (or even mistake), or the user can't get what he buys for days. Which is why anyone who thinks this is a workable currency is a fucking idiot.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  41. Re:I don't care by Lanthanide · · Score: 1

    Actually the tulip mania is way over hyped. It didn't destroy the dutch economy and it didn't affect all layers of society. The bullshit you're spouting about tulip futures and options is bullshit.

    https://www.smithsonianmag.com...

  42. Maybe Short Selling? by ytene · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those not familiar with either the term or the practice, here's a primer:-

    Imagine you think that Bitcoin is in a bubble and hugely over-priced. All it would take would be a sharp pin to burst the bubble and the price will plummet... Well, good for you if you don't have any in your portfolio, but how can you use that to make a shed-load of money?

    You sell short in the hope of starting a run. Here's how it works. You go to the market and you sell say, $100,000,000 of Bitcoin that you don't actually possess... Markets will allow you to do this, as long as you settle all your accounts by the end of the current trading period [i.e. by market close on the day]. So what happens is this:

    You have no cash to buy, and no Bitcoins, but you "sell", $100,000,000 of coins in to the market at say 20% below the currently trading price. Let's keep the numbers simple - imagine the prevailing price was $20,000/coin and you sell for, ooh... $16,000, which is the 20% drop point. The sheer size of your transaction - perhaps done because you've seen a couple of other big sales do the same thing - spooks the market. Suddenly all the traders who have been buying in to the currency are worried and they want out as quickly as possible. They start to offer their holdings for sale at steep discounts, each sale taking place way below the buying price.

    In no time the price of Bitcoins falls through the floor... Everyone wants to sell, nobody wants to buy. Except, perhaps, the suckers who had "buy orders" programmed into their trading platforms if ever the price was "foolish" enough to dip below their target price. Suddenly all those folk with automated buy positions get their trades executed, even while the price continues to tank.

    You watch the price plummet. $19,000, $18,000, $17,000, $16,000, $15,000. Eventually it hits $14,000 and the "dead cat bounce" starts - the price starts to look soooo stupidly attractive that more nuanced traders begin to buy back in. The price rallies. You buy enough coins to cover the "sale" you made at the beginning of the day. Except that you "sold" for $16,000, but you bought back in at $14,500...

    Now let's do the math and figure out how much you made [before transaction fees]. You "sold" $10,000,000 at $16,000 each, which means that you sold 625 coins. Then the price dropped to $14,500 and you bought 625 coins to cover your earlier sale. But because you only had to pay $14,500 for them, you actually pay out $90,625,000. So you've made $9,375,000 with "Other People's Money" - all in a single day.

    Congratulations, you've just passed "Banking 101"....

    Oh, and for those who read this and think, "That's all well and good in theory, but it would never happen in practice..." I'd remind you that roughly 20 years ago, "Black Wednesday" happened, which absolutely devastated the value of UK Sterling on international exchange rates - and in the process made George Soros, who bet "against" the Pound in *exactly* the way I've just described here, a billionaire.

    Until the practice of "short selling" - what I've just described in this post - is made illegal, there is *nothing* to stop this happening with Bitcoin, or with any other traded commodity. Bitcoin is no longer operating like a currency [if it ever truly did], but is now operating exactly like a "bubble" commodity, just like the dot-com boom, like antique cars, like works of art, like vintage wine.

    It's difficult to know for sure, but this event has all the hall-marks of someone attempting to burst the bubble and make a killing. I reckon if there was some short selling in this window that someone might have made a noteworthy profit, but unlikely what we saw George Soros make. Whoever it was, they'll get it right next time...

    1. Re:Maybe Short Selling? by magzteel · · Score: 1

      For those not familiar with either the term or the practice, here's a primer:-
      You sell short in the hope of starting a run. Here's how it works. You go to the market and you sell say, $100,000,000 of Bitcoin that you don't actually possess... Markets will allow you to do this, as long as you settle all your accounts by the end of the current trading period [i.e. by market close on the day]. .

      Short sellers borrow the stock they sell. Borrowing costs money, but they factor that into the risk.

      Nobody is lending you $100,000,000 in bitcoin unless they think you have the assets to repay it.

    2. Re:Maybe Short Selling? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Oh, and for those who read this and think, "That's all well and good in theory, but it would never happen in practice..."

      Do people really think this? I mean Black Wednesday was unusually large, but I was under the impression that this sort of thing happened on a smaller scale much more often.

    3. Re:Maybe Short Selling? by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      Just some nuance. There isn't anything inherently wrong with short selling. The problem is with naked shorts, which is where you sell first without having to actually borrow the thing you are selling.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    4. Re:Maybe Short Selling? by fatwilbur · · Score: 1

      You've accurately described short selling except for one point, when you say the trader would sell them for 20% below market value. No one would ever leave that much money on the table. The action of price drops comes from the fact such a large amount of the asset is being sold, and the volume available for sale exceeds the amount willing to be purchased. The price then starts slipping to find more buyers.

  43. A whole bunch of people ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 2

    ... sold high and parked their shit in cash.

    When BTC went to $12,000 the cash-holders started buying back.

    That's how it's done.

    --
    It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    1. Re:A whole bunch of people ... by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

      Probably so. And the huge fees related to gigantic network congestion, imo, pushed people to sell even faster, for fear of seeing fees rising even more. Unfortunately, I don't see how those cryptocurrencies can ever be sustainable in the long run. They are much too expensive and resource-hungry to just maintain. This is crazy.

    2. Re:A whole bunch of people ... by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      I've got a BIL who's a day trader and he's playing these swings in BTC and losing his savings.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
  44. Rapid trading needs a miner insider by nicolaiplum · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Selling a lot of BTC, quickly, and more importantly reliably, needs the cooperation of bitcoin miners to process your transaction quickly, ahead of others, instead of waiting until... whenever.

    So, look who processed all those BTC sale transactions and how they are connected with the sellers.

    Clearly, BTC trading benefits from insiders because it is so illiquid.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled"
    1. Re:Rapid trading needs a miner insider by naughtynaughty · · Score: 1

      Hmm, if only Bitcoin had a transparent way of getting your transactions priority increased without needing to collude with miners.

      Those Bitcoin miners are connected to the sellers by virtue of taking a fee to process transactions and those offering the highest fee get [preference for inclusion in a block.

    2. Re:Rapid trading needs a miner insider by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Selling happens off-chain. You may need to transfer bitcoin from your wallet to an exchange, but if they are already on the exchange, there's no waiting period at all. The exchange just changes the balances on your account and the buyer's while the actual bitcoins never leave cold storage.

  45. Bitcoin Cash testnet show 2000 tps by JcMorin · · Score: 1
  46. Bitcoin Cash is not a new idea, it's the original by JcMorin · · Score: 1

    Have you ever consider that maybe Full Block, Replace by fee, Segwit and LN are new things that got added and create the problem? Bitcoin Cash is not a new idea, it's not a new concept, it's the same old thing as described in the original white paper. That's why the name is the same. Bitcoin Cash IS Bitcoin. Bitcoin core is trying new stuff that don't work. We see it right now! More reading: https://www.bitcoin.com/info/w...

  47. Bitcoin volatile, news at 11 by marcle · · Score: 2

    So now it's back up to 14,777 as I type this comment. Does that mean this story should be updated?

  48. coinbase added BCH, margins and interest, exits by FeelGood314 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Four things happened starting on Tuesday. Coinbase added BCH, margin accounts and interest became unsustainable, margin calls, exit strategies.

    Coinbase added support for Bitcoin Cash on Tuesday. They also gave everyone 1 BCH for each BTC you had at the time of the split. This should have flooded the market with BCH and driven the price of BCH down. Also the sellers of BCH should have invested in other currencies and pushed those prices up. The opposite happened. News that coinbase was accepting BCH actually pushed BCH's price up and the shift to BCH caused other currencies to fall.

    Most of the trading is now automated trading. You can also buy on margin. However the margin has a 1.5% interest per day. Then funny things happen. If someone borrows 1 BTC and shorts it, and then buys an equivalent amount of 10 other more volatile coins using that money they could cover the interest. For the past 2 months this worked really well. Most smaller cap currencies have gone up more than BTC by more than 1.5%. It seemed like low risk investing. People treat crypto like the stock markets treat stocks assuming that having 100 different stocks has less variability than 1. Unfortunately like the stock market, there is a high level of correlation in price change.

    Now after Tuesday, people who had margin accounts had to top up their margins. This caused a slow sell but the interest rates made borrowing for more than 3 days difficult so starting late last night a lot of people had no choice but to sell.

    Exit strategies - eventually everyone has to actually use their money. I know a lot of people who have made 10x their investment. Their exit has been if it falls 30%, I sell 50%. So if they put in 100K, they had 1M yesterday, 700K this morning and then sold to have 350K in fiat and 350K still in crypto. You can automate that sell.

    The weird part. There are no natural sellers in crypto currencies. They aren't backed in any meaningful way anymore. After this crash all the remaining people who own crypto are non-sellers. They are greedy and will hold indefinitely. The margin people who had to sell are gone, my friends with exit strategies are out. The only sellers left are people who are moving money between crypto currencies. The prices of most currencies not in the top 10 market cap are going to jump 15% before the day is done. In a week the money will be poring back in and zero money will be being pulled out.

  49. For those paying attention by Khyber · · Score: 1

    Coinbase effectively stopped trading Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin, Ethereum, and a couple others. They suspect insider trading has happened. This is the most likely reason for the drop, trust in exchanges has been damaged.

    If it turns out to be insider trading, ouch for Coinbase, and the market. Maybe good for future investors as they can get a lower price now than what they've seen recently. If it doesn't turn out to be insider trading, then faith in the market will resume and the irrational bubble will inflate again.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  50. Re:Maybe it has something to do with the 4 day wai by Kaenneth · · Score: 2

    "No one goes there, it's too crowded"

    There are enough transactions to fill the blockchain, obviously someone is using it.

  51. I was wrong about the 15% gain - already 20% by FeelGood314 · · Score: 2

    My last post predicted most coins would jump 15% from this morning (EST morning). With all the sellers gone I have no idea what the gains will be but looking at the charts most are already up over 20%

  52. Sanctions? by Demena · · Score: 1

    Kim needs cash?

  53. No one knows why it skyrocketed either by magzteel · · Score: 1

    Currency cross rates don't move like that

    1. Re:No one knows why it skyrocketed either by stinerman · · Score: 1

      Bitcoin isn't, or rather has completely failed as a currency.

      It's an interesting investment, but it simply fails at being a medium of exchange.

  54. Re:Coinbase and Bcash by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    That still seems slow. When I made a large transaction for a deposit on a house, it went through in 2 hours. Cost me less than a bitcoin transaction fee as well.

  55. No one knows why? by r1348 · · Score: 1

    The whales are cashing in.
    Whoever bought them in the past months is screwed.
    We told you so.

  56. Re:Maybe Short Selling? - redo the math by FeelGood314 · · Score: 1

    It wasn't shorting. You would be a fool to short bitcoin. It has no real valuation, it's price is between zero and infinity. Shorting it and not buying something with a strong correlation in value is opening yourself up to unlimited liability. No one will currently let you borrow without a very large margin and your borrowing costs are over 1% per day.

    Let's do the math.

    You have 50M in BitCoin, you borrow another 50M. You sell all of it for 80M, and later spend 30M to buy back enough to return the 50M you borrowed. You now have 50M in cash. So for unlimited risk you came out even.

    Oh and 100M would be the very least you could use to start a short. The trading volume in the last 24h was 22 billion.

  57. Bulls and Bears... by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    make money. Pigs go to slaughter.

    Anyone with any brains has pulled half their money and will let the rest run.

    1. Re:Bulls and Bears... by tempest69 · · Score: 1

      Naaahh you buy, there are plenty of nervous traders, that will return back to the table, afraid that they will be left off the massive gains that can happen for apparently no reason. Patience it the key

  58. Tulips by jtara · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The reason has been known for hundreds of years.

    But we will never learn that a bubble is a bubble is a bubble.

    Bitcoin is a bit of technology/algorithms that would be useful if it weren't so cumbersome. There are better, more recent, solutions for the same problem, and Bitcoin will fall by the wayside.

    In the meantime, none of these things are actual currencies. It's just people playing chicken pretending there's something to back the "currency" and passing the hot-potato along until somebody gets stuck with it.

    Some day, governments or others that can act as a store of wealth may use similar technology.

  59. We know why by mysidia · · Score: 1

    Its price is notoriously volatile.... why are you surprised that it's Down a small amount after being Up a large amount?

    The market is cooling down a bit, especially at the close of the year, and when its price was up there on the precipice it takes only a small push to result into some regression towards the mean.

    In this case, the Litecoin founder being bullied into selling his coins -- the media playing Roger Ver's statements, the BCASH appearing on Coinbase, and some other recent events add up to a fairly significant Push, THEN the push gets even stronger with some initial price motion as some people react to a small dip by selling even more until it reaches a critical selling-off mass, and we have a minor price correction on our hands.

  60. Why? I'll tell you why. by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

    A bunch of fools showed up with money, and somebody took it away from them.

  61. Re: I don't care by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 1

    I don't gamble.

  62. The value of currency... by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
    The value of currency is a lot like stocks or event gambling. They have no intrinsic value, only that which people assign to it. You are basically gambling on the other peoples perception of its worth come tomorrow. If its more valuable tomorrow then people will feel more comfortable holding it. As long as people think the currency has value, then it remains valuable.

    .
    In a computer driven fast moving market like we have today, and with completely unpredictable governments turning on a dime, its hard to feel at ease with whatever things of value they are currently holding. The more uncertain the market is, then the more certain some people are going to be of its eventual devaluation, and will then be fearing that the market may soon tank, and that starts a downward trend. When others see the value declining, they too begin to think it is worth less. Once you cash out, others will follow. Its a self reinforcing feedback loop. The bad thing is that computers can algorithmically panic trade much faster, and even more completely, than their human counterparts, if not specifically coded to stop trading.

    The bottom line is you are gambling against what other people will think tomorrow. You can't control what other people think, unless you own the media, or can do so by adjusting a commoditys scarcity.

  63. Sorry, I told everyone it was a bubble by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Next time don't buy tulips, k?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  64. Re:Maybe it has something to do with the 4 day wai by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    "I still have two transactions in limbo, from EIGHT DAYS ago."

    Now there's an incentive to use blockchain for real currencies. "The check's in the mail" will be replaced by "The payment's in the queue" (Which is currently 14 weeks, 3 days and 33 minutes long)

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  65. Re:typical unregulated market by vtcodger · · Score: 1

    "coins concentrated in a few hats"

    Who may be much less numerous than folks think. If I were going to set up a scam involving trading in a cryptocurrency, one of the steps might well be to create a number of sock-puppet identities to give the impression of a broader market than actually exists.

    Not saying that's happened. Just that it's one of the contingencies anyone involved in this stiff would need to consider.

    --
    You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
  66. Re:Maybe it has something to do with the 4 day wai by AuMatar · · Score: 1

    Yes, speculators and criminal organizations looking to funnel money without having official bank transactions that can be traced. Nobody is using it to buy anything other than illegal drugs.

    --
    I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  67. Show of hands by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

    Show of hands, who here is not surprised?

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  68. Re:Maybe it has something to do with the 4 day wai by Dagger2 · · Score: 2

    Why the heck did you not just use the national currency of whatever country your store is in?

    Bitcoin is not a currency. It's a payment network, and its properties make it best for transactions between two distant people, i.e. online shopping. If you can meet in person then just use cash.

  69. Due to watershed event then dawning realization by Beeftopia · · Score: 1

    I remember exactly when the tech bubble was popped back in March 2000.

    1) Back on March 6, 2000, Nasdaq reached it's high, 5048.

    2) Watershed event: MafiaBoy had taken down major sites like Yahoo, Amazon, ETrade, Ebay back on February 6, 2000, a month earlier.

    3) Dawning realization: If these magic sites could be taken down like that, and then later discovered by a teenager, could they really be worth the 10s of billions at which they were valued?

    With crypto's:
    1) Watershed event: Litecoin founder cashes out.

    2) Dawning realization: If one of you gentle readers buys something, it's got to be recorded on the crypto database/ledger on my computer. And every other crypto holder's computer. Not so efficient. Plus a host of other shortcomings vis a vis other physical or financial assets.

  70. Re:Bitcoin Cash is not a new idea, it's the origin by Holi · · Score: 1

    All asic mined coins will consolidate to centralized control.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  71. Re:I don't care by plopez · · Score: 1

    Scroll down to where they talk about cash settled futures https://www.cnbc.com/2017/11/0...

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  72. Re: I don't care by plopez · · Score: 1

    I do trade but I'm not fucking stupid. I don't do bit coin because of all the nasty dealing involved like I don't by bond funds whose trading symbol is JNK

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  73. Re:Coinbase and Bcash by plopez · · Score: 1

    I can trade on line with a market order and fill it within a few minutes after the bell. Price locked in, just a little bookkeeping to do.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  74. Re:It's called faith. by plopez · · Score: 1

    Not liquid enough.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  75. Why has no one else mentioned.... by dbreeze · · Score: 1

    ...the passing of Trump's tax plan? This is not so much about BC value falling as it is about the value of the Federal Reserve notes in your pocket rising, amirite?

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  76. Re:Maybe it has something to do with the 4 day wai by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

    Great. So I'm a local electronics store. I sell someone a laptop for .1 BTC. Fair deal. That transaction is queued for a few days. He wants to walk out of the store with the laptop today. Either the store takes a huge risk of fraud (or even mistake), or the user can't get what he buys for days. Which is why anyone who thinks this is a workable currency is a fucking idiot.

    Which is why bitcoin isn't a real currency - it's like Gold, with the added liability that it is intrinsically worthless. But the same problem would occur if you tried to buy say, a million dollar house with a million dollars worth of gold. On what day.

    This is just the money freaks finding the latest way to screw things up.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  77. I sold by planckscale · · Score: 1

    For me, it was primarily 3 things. 1. LiteCoin was already declining throughout the past couple days. It started to lose a lot more value yesterday around noon PST. We all know they are overvalued and everyone is looking for the spark to sell. I was on edge and didn't want to lose the last 3 outstanding month's profits. 2. The adoption of BitcoinCash by Coinbase - this is like just another alt coin being placed on coinbase, so why not add ripple and doge to coinbase? When will it end? What happens with the next bitcoin fork? The money from the 3 coins on coinbase from the last year that had been doing so well because of their exclusivityu (etherium/litecoin/bitcoin) were essentially washed out and diluted by the mad rush of everyone to dump ether/LiteCoin/bitcoin for the FOMO of bccash. 3. The investigation of insider trading by coinbase. This left a lot of distrust with people about coinbase's motives.

    --
    Namaste
  78. Re: Coinbase and Bcash by reanjr · · Score: 1

    Which exactly describes how Bitcoin exchanges work. Congratulations.

  79. Re: Sorry by reanjr · · Score: 1

    I appreciate that. I sold them to you, then took your money to buy at $11k.

  80. Re: "No one knows why" by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

    I don't think most Bitcoin speculators are computer nerds. Quite the opposite if the small sample I've met is representative.

  81. Uh, nobody knows why? by chaboud · · Score: 1

    The order books were thin, several coins had risen with a feverish influx of cash, and the CME launch didn't signal wildly optimistic expectations.

    After a couple of days of mild ups and downs, things looked poised to slide down hard enough to run into everyone's stop-loss orders. The buyer side if the LTC book looked especially thin.

    I converted everything back to USD about two hours before the shit hit the fan. I did not, sadly, play much in the run back up, but I'm doing family stuff around Christmas.

    Plenty of people knew. It was overheated and ready for a correction. The bounce back has been impressive, though. I'd pegged $260 as LTC's pull out, and it's been dancing around $275. I'll live with not maxing out.

  82. casino market by Tom · · Score: 1

    What happened is that BC is now traded by the financial industry (or parts of it), and thus has turned into the same casino as the financial markets.

    I predict that fluctuations will continue as regular folks, who read all those magazine and newspaper articles, are fleeced by the professional traders who already know this game from all their other markets.

    I used to work at a broker house for a short time. Here is one life lesson I learnt: Traders make the fastest money on the down. Whenever you see a stock price crashing, someone just made a killing. The media makes it sound like a disaster and a loss - notice how literally every word that journalists use to describe a market going down fast has negative connotations? But for pros, that is a goldmine. They go home rich that day. Going up is boring, going down is where you can earn your new car, or house.

    Someone wanted a new car. That's why BC is crashing. It needed to crash to get all that sweet money that normal folks invested in the past days out of the market and into trader pockets. That's how the casino works.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  83. Re: "No one knows why" by Cederic · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I think most computer nerds got in years ago or chose to stay out completely.

    Some of us wish we'd got in years ago so that we could get out now :)

  84. Mystery solved by RenHoek · · Score: 1

    People cashed out to buy Christmas presents.. mystery solved.

    I predicted this over 2 months ago.

    Bitcoin and other cryptocurrency will keep increasing in value in the coming year.

  85. Re:Are you retarded? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    Here you go. China passport? You need a visa to come to the US. Hong Kong passport? No visa required to enter the US. Oh, and Hong Kongdoes the same thing. US passport? No problem, enter across the border! Chinese passport? Oops - you need a special visa permit.

    My wife was a Chinese national (she just naturalized as an American on the 21st), and now she will no longer have to get her annual Hong Kong visa - because she is now a US citizen.

    Now, if words are too hard for you:

    Chinese passport - says the People's Republic of China only and is RED on the outside

    Hong Kong passport - says Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. It is also BLUE on the outside.

    Lastly, look up the exchange rates between the HKD, RMB, and USD, If HK and China are the same, then why are their currency exchange rates always varying? Why can I do legal business in Hong Kong in English only, or Cantonese but in China it must be in Mandarin? Why can I have freedom to move as much currency internationally as I want - yet to do so in China, above $50,000 USD cumulatively annually, I have to register and get a permit from the Government? Why is being a member of Falun Gong legal in Hong Kong but illegal in China?

    You've probably never been to China OR Hong Kong, your ignorance shows as much...

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  86. Re: Coinbase and Bcash by plopez · · Score: 1

    except it seems to take days to do a transaction. BitCoin et. al. is not a liquid market.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
  87. Re:Are you retarded? by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

    Wow, different parts of the same country have different rules. That never happens. No, wait, it does and you're just an ignorant American.

    If words are too difficult for you try this pretty picture Hong Kong passport

    I wonder why you didn't link to this picture like you did the Chinese one...
    Is it because it clearly says Peoples Republic of China on the cover? Oh damn, we've already established you can't read...

    I guess you will just have to keep being ignorant.

  88. Re:you are still retarded? by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

    So - get the red one and no visa and go to the US! Then get the blue one and no visa and go to the US! Notice anything different in how you are treated at the US border? If so - they MUST be different passports!

    Go to China, and try to start a Falun Gong chapter. Go to Hong Kong, and do the same. Notice the difference? Must have different laws!

    Go to China, break the law, and demand a trial by jury. Go to Hong Kong, break the law, and demand a trial by jury. Notice the difference? Must have different legal systems!

    Currency, visa requirements, languages (Mandarin only in China; Mandarin, English, Cantonese - anyone or any mix of, is legal and binding in Hong Kong), judicial systems, laws, etc. At this point Hong Kong is a Special Administrative Region of China - and is totally different from China. Functionally they are radically different.

    But hey, I get that you are hung up on a word "China".I guess to you that The Demcratic People's Republic of Korea and that the Republic of Korea are the same, since they both are "Republic of Korea". Right?

    You probably still believe - like the GP that started this thread - that you can run BTC trading in China, since you can in Hong Kong! What's that? BTC trading is allowed in one and not the other? You mean the GP was WRONG when he took me to task for stating that you cannot trade BTC in China?

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  89. What has happened to journalism? by bobbutts · · Score: 1

    "Nobody knows why" is inaccurate and poor journalism. Also, in crypto-currency, there is no overnight, it's traded around the world 24/7.

  90. Try reading slowly by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1
    You are truly an idiot.

    What part of different rules did you not understand? I tried typing it really slowly for you. Maybe go back and read it again, very, very slowly this time. Get your wife to help you if you need, she sounds smart.

    Everything you just mentioned is different rules. I already told you that they have different rules. It's literally the first thing I said to you. Everyone knows this. Even you!!

    Hong Kong is a part of China. If you are born in Hong Kong you are a Chinese citizen, your passport will say as much.

    Are you really going to claim 'Republic of Korea' prints 'The Democratic People's Republic of Korea' on the front of their passports and lists the owners nationality as that as well? Or is it the other way around? Because that is absurd and easily checked.

    Why doesn't HK just put HK on their passport and HK as the nationality? Hint HK isn't a country, there are no HK citizens...

    1. Re:Try reading slowly by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Haha! Crimson Tsunami loves to post AC to stir up shit! Hurray! As far as being a citizen of China - try being a HK citizen and buying property in China. HINT: you cannot directly, you are considered a FOREIGNER by Chinese law. China LOVES to claim HK, and many (like yourself) willfully acquiesce - but the reality is they are still separate countries, recognized internationally with different laws, passports, visa requirements, currencies, and languages. Sorry, that's the fact!

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    2. Re:Try reading slowly by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1
      Surprise surprise! What do we have here:

      What procedures must foreigners, including Hong Kong residents, follow when buying a residential property in mainland China?

      Huh, Hong Kong residents and foreigners lumped together? It's almost like HK residents aren't really Chinese citizens! Different rules, different laws, different currencies, different passports and visa requirements, different languages... Hey, I guess if we broaden the definition of a US citizen, Canadians are "US citizens too!" Other than the fact they have different laws, different passports, different visa requirements, different languages (French being mandatory in Canada), and different currencies...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  91. Small market + profit taking = CRASH by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

    It will rise again.

    --
    Only boring people are ever bored.
  92. Nobody knows why? This topic is a bubble! by psb777 · · Score: 1

    Price is a function of supply & demand. Simples. There is always some pundit prepared to tell you why, like many here. But even in more regular markets, usually nobody knows why. Currencies fluctuate against one another in some seemingly random walk, and usually nobody really knows why. And it all depends on one's perspective. When gold crashes against the reference USD does not instead USD rise against gold? Given the puffed up amount of fiat currency is not the rise in the bitcoin price this last year merely a reflection of an inevitable price inflation the fear of which drives the wise into bitcoin? Well, I'm not sure I believe that myself, but my once modest holding of bitcoin was made because of despair of anywhere safe to park a little surplus wealth. And that collapse in bitcoin price of which we write here? Already recovered, almost. Bitcoin might be a bubble but the hot air bubble here, this topic, is something you cannot sell before it collapses.

    --
    Paul Beardsell
  93. Re: Sorry by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

    I appreciate that. I sold them to you, then took your money to buy at $11k.

    Of course you did. We all believe you.

  94. A you the flat Earther troll too? by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

    Facts and evidence just wash over you and you continue to believe whatever nonsense you want.

    Keep mentioning irrelevant things, it wont change the facts. Hong Kong is part of China. You haven't show anywhere that it's even a country, just that different rules apply. Everyone already knew that. I told you that at the start.

    If you do ever go to China or Hong Kong, with whatever visa you choose, make sure you don't go the wrong way and fall off your flat Earth.

  95. Cashed out and how the F*ck do you buy any? by RIC_Splinter · · Score: 1

    Price dropped because people needed money for Christmas shopping.
    Second reason is purchasing bitcoin is very difficult, go ahead see if you can purchase it in 30 minutes or less...not easy unless you have a seasoned coinbase account.
    Third reason, 11 Transactions per second worldwide ... really? As people now warming up to "hey I can send you money by scanning your QR code from your screen to pay you" realize bitcoin ain't gonna cut it ... yet they are confused which "cryptocurrency" will become mainstream and see the futile use of bitcoin at the moment.

  96. 1 country 2 systems, now where did I hear that? by crimson+tsunami · · Score: 1

    That is interesting, you keep mentioning Hong Kong residents. Why don't you mention Hong Kong citizens?

    Could it possibly be because they don't exist?
    Is that because Hong Kong isn't a country?

    If they are not Chinese what country do you think they are from? And why do they put Chinese citizen on their passports?

  97. mainstream by sad_ · · Score: 1

    losing value because it is becoming mainstream, and i don't mean you can use it to pay everywhere.
    not only everybody knows about bitcoin now (xmas dinner was fun answering all those bitcoin questions, right?), but also governments and 'real' banks are joining the discussion. just last week it was announced that the government is now taking a 33% (!) tax on earnings made with bitcoin ( https://tweakers.net/nieuws/13... - article in dutch), chinese government is also starting to meddle on bitcoins and let us not forget about the banks who now want to cash in on it.
    too much regulation, too much involvement of higher powers, means bitcoin is losing its advantage and appeal.

    --
    On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero.