Slashdot Mirror

What was said:
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07... (July 27, 2016)
""Perhaps one day the source or sources will step forward and that might be an interesting moment some people may have egg on their faces."
That sounds like the classic US insider going to the press. The Pentagon Papers, Watergate, a person with information going to the media who can give a lot of information due to their access.

Now the media is pushing ever more about some nation who can access data, look over the data, stay in a distant network, get the data in plain text, move the data out and not get caught.
Once US security experts look over the vast amounts of litter left on the network its some "Bear" code they all know about and tell the press about.
The code and method of access is so well understood that easy to find logs, code, ip details go to the waiting press.
The same very early private sector security experts talking points to the media then get picked up by gov and other media and reported as some long term gov investigation...
The origins of what was found and how it was traced become forgotten only that an existing well understood method was left to be found.

You are VERY mistaken WRT to foreign policy

And here is what Daesh thinks.
This is interesting in that a daesh expert believes that they will attack us like they attacked Paris to influence their election. And Daesh hopes that Trump wins according to them

Finally, This one sums it all up best.

But hey, look around. You can actually find articles written that will support your position, but, they are very far and few in-between and none by experts on China, Daesh, AQ, Russia, etc.

Here's a quote from an article about Samsung's washing machines exploding.

The lawsuit, filed in federal court in New Jersey, references similar reports collected by local news and filed online with regulators. It also claims Samsung "has moved aggressively to collect and destroy all evidence of the defective machines" after they exploded.

Given that this is a company that's trying to silence news of this sort, it isn't fishy in the least to hang onto the only evidence you have so that you can either hand it over to the police or use it in a lawsuit against them. That's called common sense.

Nothing is a hate symbol. People can be hateful with anything.

Name a single christian country that executes gays as a matter of law.

https://www.washingtonpost.com...

It doesn't have to statutorily punishable by death for it to be unofficially punishable by death. http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/... http://www.thedailybeast.com/a... . Uganda is 85% christian.

If I claimed that I always followed every law then I would be a liar.

If you don't like Joe, we'll take him.

Good, please do. Write to him and let him know where he should move his campaign to. And take his legal fees also.

All he does is enforce the laws that the Federal government won't.

Turns out that's not actually *all* he does. He also uses his power to intimidate his political opponents, hires private investigators (on the public's dime, of course) to dig up dirt on his political opponents, hires family members for big prison contracts, and yeah, openly violates court rulings that specifically block him from certain actions, like target Mexicans because they're Mexican. He's a wanna-be celebrity sheriff more concerned with a photo opportunity than doing his job. Go ahead and figure out how large the backlog for processing rape cases is right now. Instead of processing rape cases he would rather investigate Obama's birth certificate. If you want him, take him.

Obey the instructions of the police officer and let your lawyer / attorney / barrister handle any disputes. The solution does not even require technology. Priceless.

And when the cop shoots you for following his "lawful orders"? How about when they shoot you before saying anything, like Tamir Rice or John Crawford?

No amount of authoritarian bootlicking will save your ass from a cop bent on shooting you.

I am no authoritarian bootlicking servant. In 99% of police interactions if you comply with their instructions, you will not be injured or worse. Are there overjealous, brutish police officers? Yes, undoubtedly. Are the majority of police officers reasonable human beings? Yes. What happened this past week with the shooting death of Keith (man in vehicle reportedly with a traumatic brain injury and on medication) remains unanswered at the moment. The video footage quality is poor in terms of angles and the shakiness of the recording devices (smartphone and body cameras and even the dash-mounted camera) offers little insight. Are there murderous police officers at large? Only a fool would claim no such possibility given history. Personally, I would prefer if police officers used a taser before a firearm whenever practical. In the recent case maybe a baton would have been sufficient but we were not at the scene so armchair quarterbacking is not helpful.

Obey the instructions of the police officer and let your lawyer / attorney / barrister handle any disputes. The solution does not even require technology. Priceless.

And when the cop shoots you for following his "lawful orders"? How about when they shoot you before saying anything, like Tamir Rice or John Crawford?

No amount of authoritarian bootlicking will save your ass from a cop bent on shooting you.

Ah, so if the grant total of other administrative expenses for a drug company (of which your article freely admits that marketing is only a part, and tellingly doesn't even attempt to quantify how much) are more than R&D, and if you cherry-pick a single year such that it obfuscates the cyclic nature of R&D (where R&D for a given drug will be separated from marketing expenses and profits for that drug by many years), then R&D doesn't cost much of anything and thus need not really impact the sales price of a drug. Got it. I really want to think you would be a bit more attuned to this kind of shoddy analysis and faulty logic if its conclusion wasn't what you already obviously want to believe.

And it's also interesting that after you painted yourself into a corner on the original topic -- that the U.S. can't arbitrarily slash its pricing structure for drugs without adversely affecting the overall drug landscape, both for itself and others -- you've jumped to another lilypad and are now embracing a fundamental change to that landscape, arguing to put the entire pharmaceutical industry under state control (employing, dare I say, banal socialist propaganda?). I guess that's fine as long as you don't mind new, useful drugs -- and maybe even sufficient quantities of existing drugs -- becoming roughly as available as health care for veterans or eggs in Venezuela. Party on, comrade.

As we all saw, Russia interfered with the free and open elections in Eastern Ukraine after the Putin lapdog Yanukovych fled into the arms of Putin when the people of Ukraine wanted closer, more open ties with the West.

Russia sent in its troops and armed its terrorist proxies who burned polling places, burned ballots, threatened anyone who tried to vote, tried to rig votes, and even bragged about doing all of the above by recording their goings on.

Considering the amount of groveling Trump is doing at Putin's feet for his own personal gain and has openly asked for the same foreign government to commit espionage on a U.S. citizen, it would be surprising if Russia wasn't trying to game the system. So long as Putin has been in power that has been the name of game in Russia: only those Putin approves are allowed to run for office.

That Russia is now trying to electronically influence U.S. elections only shows how desperate Putin is to have the sanctions lifted which are dragging his country down each day they are in place. As reported a week ago, Russia will literally run out of money by the middle of next year if sanctions aren't lifted. Supporting the terrorists in Eastern Ukraine and the Syrian regime is costing Russia money it can ill-afford to lose yet from all appearances, Putin is vowed and determined to drag Russia down with him. That is why they are attempting to interfere in U.S. elections.

I'm not an American, so I won't be voting for either, but it does seem that (a) most of the stories about Hillary, if not all of them, are just shitposts by whiners who can't speak intelligently to problems with her policy direction, and (b) Trump has no clue how to lead a country, and no idea about what to do in complex policy issue like Syria, to the extent that he says whatever comes to mind at the time and he has no regard for whether the things he says are true and accurate, or not.

Just my impression.

Citation needed. He has ONLY expressed that he doesn't want ILLEGAL immigrants here. You know, people who break the law?

He has expressed that he wants to limit immigration of Muslims or anyone from "any nation that has been compromised by terrorism":
link

You really believe the following direct quote isn't racist?

“When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you. They’re not sending you. They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems with us. They’re bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”

First I will note that you completely skipped (for a second time) the question I put to you in response to your assertion: "You made an assertion about non-functionion male genitals. I'm asking how only those transsexuals with non-functioning male genitals will be allowed to use the women's bathroom."

You call me chicken shit (for not fully quoting you, though when pressed you give nothing that would have invalidated my reply), but here you are dodging a question based on your assertion.

I also did not see you admit that the North Carolina anti-trans state law was in response to a pro-trans city law, despite your earlier implication that it was conservatives against gay marriage going after a new target that started all this bathroom nonsense.

You originally said "It never happens."

That's twice now you fabricated a quote that I did not say. I gave a single case, "When men dress up as women in Hollywood movies, it's for a gag." I admitted there were other cases I missed, namely the "progressive" cause du jour of transsexuals.

It doesn't invalidate the context of the argument, which started with you talking about male actors in Shakespeare being accepted as women (turns out the law forbid women from acting at the time). The overwhelmingly vast majority of women's roles in Hollywood are taken by actual women. In fact, the only cases that you gave me were roles where the "women" were transsexual as specified by the role.

you'd get your ass sued

That's what passing trans laws has done, opening up new lawsuit threats. This happens every time the government creates a new "equality" law.

As for the "upset customers", first off, transsexuals and their allies (which are a significant portion of the consumer public) also have the right to be upset by not letting transsexuals pee in the safest place for them.

Everybody has a "right" to be pissed off or not.

They have all discovered that supporting the rights of transsexuals is just good business. It makes economic sense.

No, they all jumped in to the current climate of political correctness and the "progressive" cause du jour. Whether it makes economic sense or not is debatable, as they're really just afraid of the mainstream press targeting them and doing virtue signaling of their own to get positive press.

In response to all this drama, started by "progressives", Target is spending $20 million to install a single-use bathroom for any sex in all its stores.

so again, what are you really afraid of?

How many times do I have to answer this? I'm not afraid of anything, and I have very little interest in the bathroom drama, but you insist on dragging me into this argument, and I feel obliged to correct some of your bullshit and play devil's advocate.

It doesn't cost anything to use the new name and gender, so why do you have a stick up your ass on this issue?

Because I refuse to go along with the herd and participate in other people's delusions. We've already covered this.

And if you think you can tell, you're wrong. Twice last year I rented out my spare bedroom to men for 4 months each.

Congratulations. But there are plenty of cases where I could tell. And I'm guessing you didn't have sex with any of your roommates without them knowing.

Clinton released her medical records

No she didn't. Even the Clinton News Network denies that claim:

"This is certainly not a release of medical records by any means. This is very similar, in some ways, to what we got in July of last year," Gupta said.

No, not made up. http://edition.cnn.com/2014/10...

Wow.. you got to be one of THE BIGGEST trump apologist I've ever seen.

First:

Trump's complete ignorance of the fact that Obama's mother was a US Citizen when he was born, and the push that he's not an American on the fabrication that he was born in Kenya, only for the sole fact that his father was Kenyan, was purely motivated by his mixed race.

Second:

What Trump actually said, was that the judge — a Mexican racist himself ("La Raza" member) — may have a conflict of interest. If it is Ok to suspect [washingtonpost.com], that an All-white jury [wikipedia.org] may be unfair to a Black defendant, why is it "racist" to suspect, a Mexican may be unfair to a White one?

You will need to provide substantial proof that the judge is racist before you can make a statement like that.

That Judge is apart of a group called "San Diego La Raza Lawyers Association", not the "La Raza" association you're thinking of.
http://www.snopes.com/judge-cu...

Third:

Has proposed banning members of a religion from the US (very similar to racism).

Not racism. Stick to the topic.

That's pretty much racist. It impacts a wide swath of individuals classified as Muslim, which is directly attributed to anybody from the Middle East, who's appearances are starkly contrasted to caucasians.

There have been numerous attacks on Sikhs who were believed to be muslim because they "looked like a muslim." The only similarity is the skin color.

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/14/...

Fourth:

Trump's Real Estate business that he ran with his father were biased against black renters

https://www.documentcloud.org/...

That happened in 1973. He took over his father's business in 1971.

Fifth:
Trump stated that he wouldn't disavow David Duke because he didn't know who he was or what he was about.

Except that was a lie:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

He clearly knows who David Duke is, unless it helps his agenda to feign ignorance.

Just a quick list of scandals from which she has recovered (source: http://www.redstate.com/califo...):

• Watergate - Hillary was fired from the staff of the House Judiciary committee investigating the Nixon Watergate scandal in 1974 by her supervisor, Democrat Jerry Zeifman, because she was a liar. Hillary "conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality.”
• Hillary’s ‘missing’ law firm billing records during the Watergate scandal. When the records mysteriously turned up in the White House in 1996, they showed Hillary met repeatedly with key figures in the scandal.”
• Whitewater.
• Travelgate - Hillary allegedly fired seven employees and gave the positions to her Arkansas friends in a scheme to award a White House airline contract to a Clinton friend.
• Filegate - The Clintons illegally obtained FBI files on political adversaries.
• Selling access to the Lincoln Bedroom -- a fundraising scandal, which NBC's Jim Miklaszewski described as the most expensive bed and breakfast in North America. Some of the 958 visitors who slept at the White House during Clinton's first term. Steve Jobs paid $150,000, and Steven Spielberg paid $200,000.
• Cattle Futures Scandal.
• The Clintons' speaking fees.
• Benghazi
• Emailgate
• Selling Access to the Secretary of State -- the Clinton Foundation's pay for scandal.
• Faintgate

> The good old days were not good. In the US, you could be lynched just
> because of your skin color, and the perps, which often included the
> local sheriff, would get away scot free. This is just one example out of scores.

In 2015 or 2016...

s/lynched/killed during a traffic stop/

http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/21/...
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/po...

That suspect was holding his rifle and actively searching all around him for any threats. The robot positioned the explosives out of sight, behind a brick wall. Technically the robot wasn't needed - a person could've done it. But the Dallas Police decided to sacrifice the robot rather than risk sending a person in there to plant the explosives.

If you read TFA, in this case the suspect was lying prone on his stomach, with the rifle at his feet. The police distracted him by yelling at him over megaphones and buzzing him with a helicopter, while the robot took the rifle.

The Russians are laughing all right, but this is way down the list.

True, but that's because Russia has a serious cash flow problem. At the current burn rate, which includes supporting the Syrian regime both militarily and financially, as well as the terrorists in East Ukraine, again both militarily and financially, Russia will run out of cash roughly by the middle of next year.

This presumes oil stays below $50/barrel and Putin doesn't decide to tell the terrorists he's pulling out his Russian troops and will only send in ammunition and equipment, not troops, the reason being the cost of paying out death benefits to family members and even worse, the monthly costs of paying for those troops and auxiliaries who have been wounded.

With the recent capture of another Russian who provided information that Russian troops are now in complete control of some of the terrorist battle groups, the costs to Russia for the invasion are rapidly become unsustainable.

And the fault of the Republicans apparently: http://money.cnn.com/2016/09/1...

They didn't copy everything. If this were the US, after the four engineers were fired, their manager would have been given a $124 million retirement package.

Samsung to limit battery charging on Galaxy Note 7 phones to prevent fires

Basically, they're updating software in their home market to only charge up to 60% until everyone stops using them.

The software update is due to be introduced early the following day [next Tuesday] for phones that haven't been exchanged, according to the newspaper ad.

The ad didn't say whether the update would be automatic or require users' agreement. Samsung didn't respond to a request for more information on the software patch.

In the U.S., the company is working with the Consumer Product Safety Commission to figure out how a formal recall of the phones will work.

Asked about the software update, a Samsung spokesperson in the U.S. said that "no action will be taken without the approval of the CPSC."
 

CNN Poll showing Trump leads Clinton by 20 points amongst independents. (Took 5 seconds to look up your "facts").

I think you are just in denial that Trump is likely to win and that Clinton is not only going to lose, she is a deplorable person who has commited a long list of felonies showing that the FBI and DOJ have two levels of justice depending on who you are. Trump may be good, he may be bad, but he has shown EVERYONE how incompetent the news media is and how completely corrupt the DNC and most of DC is. Even if Clinton wins the election, she and the DNC still lose because of all the uncomfortable questions they are refusing to answer.

In the immortal words of Sarah Palin: Suck it up, cupcake ...

We have fewer Americans in the workforce that we did a decade ago and that continues to decline.

This one is due in huge part to the baby boom and all of them retiring. Between that and a decline in birth rates, you're going to have a smaller workforce.

Not true according to Bloomberg : http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...

The decrease in the labor force last month also probably didn’t reflect the retirement of more baby boomers. The participation rate among those 65 years old and older rose to 18.9 percent in April from 18.5 percent the prior month.

Not entirely true, according to US News : http://www.usnews.com/news/the...

In a nutshell, the baby boomers have aged and are now finally retiring en masse. After bulging into the workplace in the 1970s, women are no longer the force in the labor market they once were. Younger people are opting to educate themselves rather than work. And a less-than-friendly tone toward immigrants is shrinking the supply for some high-skilled jobs.

Not according to MSNBC : http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/fe...

In other words, a remarkable number of Americans are not only unemployed, but are also declining to seek new employment. That includes a striking number of 18-24 year olds, according to a new report from Demos called “Stuck: Young America’s Persistent Jobs Crisis.” According to the report, Americans in that age group had lower participation rates than 25-34 year olds or 35-64 year olds across the educational spectrum.

Thats just the first few articles on a google search of "fewer americans in the workforce", and no one would claim that those sources are slanted Republican or Conservative. They are from 2012, 2013 and 2015, and the trend continues thru today. But just to make sure, here's that same search limited to the last year.

According to the Chicago Tribune : http://www.chicagotribune.com/...

The problem is particularly pronounced among men between the ages of 25 and 54, traditionally considered the prime working years. Their participation rate has been declining for decades, but the drop-off accelerated during the recession. The high mark was 98 percent in 1954, and it now stands at 88 percent. A new analysis from the White House's Council of Economic Advisers, slated for release Monday, found that the United States now has the third-lowest participation rate for "prime-age men" among the world's developed countries.

And from CNN Money : http://money.cnn.com/2016/02/0...

1. Fewer adults are working
Only 62.7% of adult Americans are working. The so-called Labor Force Participation rate hasn't been this low since the late 1970s. The rate measures how many people over age 16 are working or actively seeking work. Back in the '70s, it was low because fewer women worked outside the home. That's not the story today. Now, three factors are driving the decrease in workers. The first is that a huge part of the adult population, Baby Boomers, are retiring. That's expected and healthy. It explains about half of the decline in the workforce.

The second is more young people are going to college and graduate school. They are studying more, which should be a positive for the nation. But the third one is alarming: some people have just given up on finding work. It's hard to qu

perhaps this is why iPhone 7 orders are FOUR TIMES the previous model (and THAT without a 3.5mm Jack!).

First, you're a known asshole, liar, troll, and disgusting Apple zealot.

And you're an ANONYMOUS COWARD. So, I win.

So, your citation free claim needs to be taken with a huge boulder of salt.

I provided a citation in another comment in this thread. But, here's a Citation. Here's another. And another. Convinced yet., COWARD?

Second, a large portion of people who buy iPhones are idiots who either don't know the jack is missing or haven't yet realized what a pain in the ass it will be.

Now where's YOUR citation, COWARD?

This is one of Apple's dick-moves that will need a great deal of time to fully materialize. After all, the phone hasn't actually landed in public hands yet. Recall the first iPhone with it's bastardized, recessed headphone jack. Typical for Apple to fuck with a known standard in order to grab more cash, but that backlash was enough for them to save face by switching back to a normal headphone jack with the iPhone 3G.

Really? All that vitriol because someone at Apple (Jony Ive?) fucked up and didn't test EVERY headphone on the market, to see that SOME headphones/earbuds had a BUNCH of plastic around the tip of the plug. It isn't like they violated some "standard" about how much room had to be left around the jack. Plus, It wasn't that they used an "abnormal" headphone jack; they just made the MISTAKE (which they corrected the next go-round) of RECESSING the jack, FFS. I've owned other equipment that has had that same problem, precisely BECAUSE there isn't a "standard" on the maximum outer diameter of the PLASTIC on a 4.5mm male.

Hyperbole much?

"Samsung is in talks with telcos from nine other countries where the phablet is available to deploy a similar software upgrade." This is a great example of just how broken Android really is. If it was Apple (and MS?), everyone would get this right away, but instead it has to be dealt with carrier by carrier, and if your carrier decides not to allow for the patch ("bandwidth!"), Samsung decides not to work with your carrier, or someone misses an email you won't be getting it at all.

Telcos should have zero say in when or how you update your device, or have any say in what you do with it in the first place.

Actually, I was thinking how this proves that Android actually CAN push an update in short order... When it suits THEIR purposes.

Samsung deserves every single lost sale because of this.

Meanwhile, iPhone 7 orders are FOUR TIMES of the previous model. Wonder if it has anything to do with the fact that, for a LOT of people, this is the last straw with Android and their shitbox... Well, EVERYTHING?

It would be nice to actually listen to the people in news rather than place all blame on the cyber fantasy of Fancy Bear:
"Julian Assange: 'A lot more material' coming on US elections" (July 27, 2016)
http://edition.cnn.com/2016/07...
""Perhaps one day the source or sources will step forward and that might be an interesting moment some people may have egg on their faces. But to exclude certain actors is to make it easier to find out who our sources are,""
Its amazing how that well understood but really powerful "Fancy Bear" tools set gets into so many well protected networks unnoticed... Only to be found by investigators so quickly as it is so just easy to find once it is in a network...
So rather than some all powerful, hard to track, no logs, no tools left behind method is a rather common "spear phishing" event...

Her name is Kim Phuc and she now lives in Canada. She was fleeing a napalm strike by the South Vietnamese Air Force.

How the Vietnam War's 'Napalm Girl' Is Finally Getting Her Scars Treated – 43 Years Later
The girl in the picture: Kim Phuc's journey from war to forgiveness
'Napalm Girl': An Iconic Image Of War Turns 40

The Kim Foundation International

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/05/...

http://www.koamtv.com/story/25...

http://www.lex18.com/story/330...

and NBC, CNN, FOX, NY Times. This has been all over the news.

Yes, I'm sure she murdered all those people. Also that Whitewater thing must have been real, it's just, if only Ken Starr had had thirty nine point THREE million to spend on the investigation, rather than $39.2M, he'd have managed to get some evidence.

I say vote for Alice Cooper:

http://www.cnn.com/2016/08/19/...

None of that explains why CNN reported on Building 7 20 mins before it fell.

@@ .... Right, nobody reports major buildings on fire. (especially when part of the complex under a major terrorist attack)

September 11: Chronology...

4:10 p.m.: Building 7 of the World Trade Center complex is reported on fire.

--------

Plus investigations using computer models only contrive one possible scenario, none of which are likely scenarios.

You're kidding. Computer aided design, modeling, and analysis are basic, key tools in engineering these days.
Apparently it is news to you that unlikely events do happen. NIST verified what seems to be a design problem.

Add alien invasion into the computer model because at this point is far more likely.

The problem here isn't "aliens" but trolls.

Seoul may get nuked, it may not - for any chance of a nuke hitting Seoul, it would need to be either mounted on a rocket, or fired as an artillery shell, and both of those options require some serious technical ability which the NK's lack.

Currently.

That's why all the practice runs firing missiles into the sea of Japan are troubling. They are getting better at it.

Your statement is true - today - but it won't be here in a decade or so. And it's not likely NK will be less nuts ten years from now.

Seems to be the case. I saw the other day Trump suggested that the military should have its own courts. The guy's a fucking genius.

He has also hinted at a desire to purge the top brass of the American military (4th paragraph from the bottom).

This story is from the same CNNMoney that declared that Math is Racist

The story declared no such thing, but don't let that stop you. It describes how statistics and computer algorithms and models are used to perpetuate inequality and racist dynamics. It says math is being used to perpetuate racism, not that math is racist.

Facebook should be safe, they won't even allow people to post (or discuss the removal of) Pulitzer Prize winning photographs. Tumblr on the other hand...

The UC system is currently run by Hillary's friend and former Anita Hill lawyer Janet_Napolitano, hardly a right winger. Also, Hillary called TPP (which she helped negotiate and which will remove all limits on outsourcing, offshoring, and importing of cheap labor) "the gold standard in trade agreements" before switching during the campaign and opposing it while her buddy Democrat governor Terry McAuliffe was telling people she will flip back into support of it after she gets elected.

Yes, in the post-Bill-Clinton-world of free trade with commie China, Trump makes things like ties and shirts in China like nearly all the vendors he competes with, however he builds all his big American products (golf courses, resorts, skyscrapers) in the USA (though obviously he builds his foreign buildings in the countries where they arelocated). Yes,sadly he makes his small [relatively] cheap products in China under current rules, but he has said he will return that work to the US after the rules are changed for everybody including his competitors.

Hillary has no experience making ANYTHING and there's zero evidence she is in any way concerned with making things in America.

Want more of the economy of the past 7 years? Vote Hillary.

Want change? The you have to do something different to get different results: vote for the guy the establishments of BOTH parties despise: Trump.

Want all the big money out of politics? Hillary has spent over a hundred million dollars on ads trashing Trump, and most of that money comes from super-wealthy supporters and Wall St bankers (she has never made any product to earn that money). Trump has spent next to nothing. This is a once-in-a-lifetime chance to put somebody in office who owes nothing to Wall St bankers. If Hillary wins, you will likely NEVER see a reduction in campaign cash in your lifetime, but if Trump wins, every politician, ad meister, pollster, campaign consultant, lobbyist, pundit and columnist will have to seriously re-consider the role of money in elections.

The UC system is currently run by Hillary's friend and former Anita Hill lawyer Janet_Napolitano, hardly a right winger. Also, Hillary called TPP (which she helped negotiate and which will remove all limits on outsourcing, offshoring, and importing of cheap labor) "the gold standard in trade agreements" before switching during the campaign and opposing it while her buddy Democrat governor Terry McAuliffe was telling people she will flip back into support of it after she gets elected.

Yes, in the post-Bill-Clinton-world of free trade with commie China, Trump makes things like ties and shirts in China like nearly all the vendors he competes with, however he builds all his big American products (golf courses, resorts, skyscrapers) in the USA (though obviously he builds his foreign buildings in the countries where they arelocated). Yes,sadly he makes his small [relatively] cheap products in China under current rules, but he has said he will return that work to the US after the rules are changed for everybody including his competitors.

Hillary has no experience making ANYTHING and there's zero evidence she is in any way concerned with making things in America.

Want more of the economy of the past 7 years? Vote Hillary.

Want change? The you have to do something different to get different results: vote for the guy the establishments of BOTH parties despise: Trump.

Want all the big money out of politics? Hillary has spent over a hundred million dollars on ads trashing Trump, and most of that money comes from super-wealthy supporters and Wall St bankers (she has never made any product to earn that money). Trump has spent next to nothing. This is a once-in-a-lifetime chance to put somebody in office who owes nothing to Wall St bankers. If Hillary wins, you will likely NEVER see a reduction in campaign cash in your lifetime, but if Trump wins, every politician, ad meister, pollster, campaign consultant, lobbyist, pundit and columnist will have to seriously re-consider the role of money in elections.

This story is from the same CNNMoney that declared that Math is Racist

Why do you feel its competitors copying Apple by making unibody phones? The newest Samsungs are virtually indistinguishable from iPhone 6.

You mean, just like the original Samsung smartphones were virtually indistiguishable from the original iPhone.

We noticed that foreign tax havens aren't so reliable, so we'll try some domestic tax havens for a change. We'll bite the bullet and probably have to pay twice the tax we had to pay in Ireland (which would probably be a whooping 0.01% instead of the 0.005% so far).

"The truth is, she was using (the private email server) for a year before I sent her a memo telling her what I did," Powell said.

Source: CNN

Then again, who are you going to believe, Powell or Clinton?

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/02/...

Really? Read that, she is either lying or completely incompetent...

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/...

Took 2 seconds to Google, you lazy faggot.

http://www.cnn.com/videos/cnnm...

Decent video of the explosion there.

Doesn't appear to be anywhere near the rocket motor but almost directly below the payload.

You mean the phone that belonged to San Bernardino county that they forgot to install MDM software on it and then when the government tried to get the data from the automated backup (or was that reset the password) screwed that up too. As far as I know nothing has come of the data that the government got out of the phone using some undisclosed exploit. Turns out all that effort would have been better used if instead the FBI had tried pissing up a rope.

Several incidents are describe in this story:

1) workers receiving 6 to 8 months in prison for protesting unpaid wages.

2) Arbitrary detention of several labor leaders in Guangdong province.

3) Wu Guijun, labor activist detained for more than a year for "gathering a crowd to disrupt traffic", the same activity that you cited in your original post which lead to a short term detention and fine.

I can partly agree, but their rapid expansion has also left notable gaps that are still third-world-ish. For example, their horrible pollution, and poor working conditions in e-waste. U.S. faced similar problems around 1900. It took a few decades to adjust.

(P.S. sorry for missing the "a" before "double standard". Modnays.)