Slashdot Mirror

Yup. He Tomahawked an airbase in Syria after a chemical attack, something Obama didn't do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

And he shot down a Syrian jet.

https://edition.cnn.com/2017/0...

Both of those are significant because Russian personnel were at the airbase. Russian pilots also fly Syrian aircraft.

If you look at the CNN coverage of the jet shootdown they were warning rather excitedly of the risk of a US/Russia war over that, which of course never happened. And at the same time they're obsessed with the idea that Trump is or was colluding with the Russians, with collusion being an ill defined term. See for example the Wikileaks collusion story. Which had one major flaw - the email with the Wikileaks codes came from a supporter after Wikileaks had gone public. CNN ran with the story because they were too lazy to check the dates.

https://www.theguardian.com/us...

Then again they were accusing him of being a Neo Nazi at the same time as saying moving the US Embassy to Israel - something Bush and Obama said they'd do when campaigning but didn't do in office - would provoke violence from the Palestinians. I.e. Trump was being too pro Israel.

I.e. CNN don't make no sense. Either Trump is a Putin stooge, or he's trying to provoke a war with Russia. Either he's a Neo Nazi or he's too pro Israel.

Funny thing is Trump's media management isn't all that good. He hasn't got much done legislatively. It should be easy to attack him. CNN lack the attention to detail to attack him without making themselves look like idiots to the point where now if they did find some sort of smoking gun who'd even pay attention? They've cried wolf too many times to be credible.

People often point out that Fox viewers are old, but CNN's aren't that much younger. 68 vs 60

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Given people tend to become more conservative as they get older, it's not that surprising Fox has a higher average age.

Neither Fox nor CNN have any programs I'd personally watch. Both of them are straight up propaganda for the RNC and DNC respectively.

I have to ask this. What planet are you living on?

This one, and I'll respond to that in response to your next sentence

Here you go my misandryst compadre: https://www.youtube.com/watch?... A North Carolina man's daughter lied when she accused him of raping her.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new... A man's wife falsely accused him of molesting his daughter.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/trav... A woman accused a man of sexually molesting his daughter, while they were on an airplane flight, because she thought his skin was too dark ? I guess she just knew that he was pimping her out or something.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new... A social worker accuses a man of molesting his daughter - again, falsely, Apparently mens fault she did that

http://www.latimes.com/local/l... Man falsely accused of molesting a child. http://www.smh.com.au/nsw/man-... Man falsely accused of sexual assault by teenage girl. NOw on the the never occuring false accusations of sexual harassment in the workplace.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new... Yup, woman accuses a man of sexual harassment, ruins him.

Here's one that should make you happy a man falsely accused of rape. He hung himself, ismn't that what men deserve? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men...''

https://www.dailywire.com/news... et us not forget The Rolling Stone's shining moment, when what you probably were partying about, when the Rolling stone and "Jacie" a victim of gang rape by the patriarcial members of a Fraternity this was the real dirt on all men ar pigs, and rapid justice was needed. THere was just one little teeny weenie problem.

It was completely false, as in a lie. Don't worry though, after all of the trouble for th eUniversity and th eFraternity, Jackie was never charge - and that is the important thing. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

Perhaps you agree that the problem is so awful that innocent men must be destroyed to get rid of this probelm - after all you wrote in another pose that all men are assholse. Here is a link to re-affirm your cognitive dissonance.https://www.dailywire.com/news/23892/teen-vogue-columnist-claims-shes-not-concerned-if-emily-zanotti

So anyhow - no, it is not likely that men will be falsely accused of sexual harassment. That much is true. Most women just want to get along in life and find love and friends, and happiness, and to avoid being abused. I suspect you disagree based on some of your remarks, but the same is true of most men.

But there is a fair non zero chance of being falsely accused of something that will end your career without any chance of response, and that might get you sent to jail, and have to register as a sex offender.

And society and the legal system is on her side, not yours. Even if you are eventually exonerated, you

>properly prepare a meal or even clean up after it.

Cleaning up afterwards is actually much more complicated. Preparing food, it's possible to use image recognition, predictable locations for everything, measuring cups, etc. We're not there yet, but we're certainly well on the way. Cleaning up, however, requires recognizing arbitrarily shaped, colored, and placed dirt in around all sorts of nooks and crannies. That or a totally redesigned kitchen that can be sealed and cleaned like a giant dishwasher.

Except then you would expect that to come out as a win in the company reports since there's no (M/F) marker in the profit ledger. In fact, the second you take a step back from the office space you would notice a big boost as the stock would do better (less pay means more profit per employee) and the company earnings would be greater (same reason). Yet, that doesn't seem to be the case...

And just for fun
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/fem...

There has been some studies showing some people basically can't gain much fat, but if their body still takes in too many calories it causes problems. The result is way too much LDL cholesterol or something similar in their blood... it also either lead to heart problems or diabetes or both, I can't recall.

These links might be close, but not the exact thing I remember:

http://time.com/14407/the-hidd...

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/2614...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

No. They're all white men.

Yep, diversity applies to pretty much everyone....except old white guys....

Actually it doesn't apply to white guys at all, regardless of age. Even suggesting diversity could ever positively involve a white male will get you fired.

Citations:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new... http://dailycaller.com/2017/11...

This will end up in cat/mouse, and the mouse will always get away.

Actually, no. The cat vs mouse analogy implies that while a cat is extremely adept at catching prey, mice are such prolific breeders that even a skilled predator can't exterminate them completely. While mice are oblivious to the fact their compatriots are being picked off, we humans aren't the same.

We can be bribed or threatened not to fuck with the cat. It generally works.

That doesn't give me confidence in the currency, if my money could be frozen at someone else's whim.

I know what you mean. Imagine if some (relatively) stable country were to pull it's 500 and 1000 rupee denomination notes suddenly. Chaos would ensue. But that would never happen, would it?

Oh wait: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wir...

> Lena Dunham though, I can't find any case there except for her defence of a Girls' Writer who was accused.

Dunham wrote about doing something to her little sister's vagina in one of her books.

The Daily Mail of all things actually covers it pretty well with excerpt's from Dunham's book as well as Dunham's tweets on the topic, such as:

"And by the way, if you were a little kid and never looked at another little kid's vagina, well, congrats to you."

I should note that they revised the book to say that Dunham's age at the time of this was 7, not 17, as originally printed.

You've got it backwards there. The left and far left have pushed on regular people to the point where left-wing politicians and academia have told, implied, and shamed people in general not to take pride in their country, culture, and so on.

No, you have it backwards. The Right, and the Far Right, have pushed on regular people to the point where right-wing politicians demagoguery have told, implied, and shamed people in general not to criticize their country, culture, and so on, as anything less than fervent pride is wretched base calumny.

Patriotism has been corrupted by the most vilest act of all.

Of course, there are problems with the nature of pride, not to mention your own support for the suppression of Cornish, Jersey, Manx, Welsh, Scottish, Irish, and other identities.

Then went on blaming them that all the ills in the world are their fault and so on. The backlash is growing because the left created their own enemy.

Again, backwards, the right then went on stoking up the fires of outrage and hysteria, to get the mob of people chanting their denunciations en masse. It's easy to provoke, people are easily misled by the forces of anger and hatred. That way somebody ELSE is to blame.

Common psychology really, responsibility is hard to apply for yourself, easy to apply to others.

That ranges in everything from those 'minorities' getting preferential treatment in the judicial system, to those minorities given a free pass to rape young girls for decades(see rotherham in the UK and other cities there). And the police being 'afraid of being labeled racist' as the reason that they did nothing. Or turning around and charging the rape victim with a hate crime, while letting her attacker go free.

Yes, we know the British police aren't a hotbed of racism and bigotry, they don't cover up crimes, they don't blame the innocent, nope.

And I didn't even bring up their misconduct in Northern Ireland.

If you don't think this is the way that it happened, you only need to look at media.

If you don't realize how the right-wing is making things up, you need to look at them with a more critical eye.

With the various "cultural appropriation" garbage, or buildings being scrubbed of historical names because 'reasons' of whatever they might be.

Are you still upset that people keep telling you that your cuisine isn't genuinely authentic British, but a hodgepodge of varying intersecting influences?

Or are you upset that people no longer want to be associated with tobacconists? You never protested when things were being renamed as tributes to Thatcher. Curious that. Very curious.

Political correctness was the start of this, people put up with it for a long time. But even people who are browbeaten, because they can't do something for "fear of being labeled a racist" will eventually have enough.

LOL, the "politically correct" attitude among the right is why they're smashing Keurigs and threatening anybody who cancels commercial time on their preferred media outlets. Meanwhile, the actual people who are browbeaten, the exploited and abused, you don't care about, and won't even spend one word of thought for them.

It's always funny when the right-wing stalwarts complain about "PC" though, when they're the most demanding tha

Don't forget to upgrade your friend rental to include a dog on the side.

I'd rather not add to the local landfill if I don't have to

I didn't know you lived in Africa.

Others report it being worse, so I think you've been lucky so far.

Alternatively ...
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvs...

The empirical data show the Transient Climate Response is 1/3rd the modeled value, down by nearly a factor of 10 from the modeled value a decade ago. The ECS is about half the modeled value. See Figure 7 of the following peer-reviewed paper:
http://www.iieta.org/sites/def...

Stop listening to people and look at the empirical evidence of the satellite and balloon datasets for yourself. The UN IPCC AGW Hypothesis is now falsified at the 95% level and the observed rate of warming matches the rate for the last 150 years where changes in solar magnetic activity cause the well-attested Little Ice Age and we've been warming out of it ever since. If you deny the 3 satellite and 7 balloon datasets in favor of the Lysenkoist Government position then you are an anti-scientific Flat Earther.

Buzz Aldrin (Second Man to walk on the Moon) and a lot of other astronauts are skeptical about the UN IPCC AGW Hypothesis:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...

You would think the doomsayers would be happy that the Earth was not being destroyed by modern technology. but no, they appear to want to cling to their apocalyptic delusion in defiance of the observed data.

ps. the surface data sets are completely worthless. Most people who cling to them don't know that nearly 50% of the data is now 'estimated' based on assuming the IPCC model is true. The surface data sets are no longer 'observations' according to the Scientific Method, they are in fact 'hypothesis'. The data are the satellite and balloon data sets.

First, see what kind of social and economic mischief you can carry out in the West by way of "anonymous" activity on the Internet - do it cheap, like get kids to help out, and take note how hard it is to trace back to the culprit.
(in parallel, see how much actual damage can be carried out, using Ukraine as a guinea-pig).
Next, notice well it all worked, beyond all reasonable expectations, even to the extent of swaying elections of public officials in the U.S. (they're holding Congressional hearings about us!), and encouraging open revolt against the state and inflaming street unrest.
Third, in view of the fact that Russian officials do not tolerate street unrest and open revolt against the state, conclude that this "research experiment" has proven without question that the Internet is a danger to the Motherland and its beloved leader, Valdimir Putin.
Fourth and finally, take pre-emptive action based on this valuable research to crush this threat and make sure it don't never happen here (Russian military take note... could be useful someday; continue research).
P.S.: President Xi says to Putin in his heavy Chinese accent, "way ahead of you."
P.P.S.: Kim Jong-un says it was all my idea.

You've not got your reasoning right at all.

There are 38k James Smiths in the US, out of 120m white men.
There are 32k Maria Garcias in the US, out of 21m Hispanic women.

James Smiths account for 0.04% of white men and appears 4.5 times less often among that population than Maria Garcia appears among Hispanic women (0.18%). So the Hispanic population sees a higher proportion of collisions than the white population.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

In the vase of the new British carriers, that's cart-before-the-horse. Now they have the embarrassment of an expensive shiny new carrier with no planes. Even Max Hastings is calling it a blunder.

Guys do we remember this News story. I remember how much flack I got from people when I told them I don't have a FaceBook profile. Now it's as if I'm hailed as some sort of hero by my peers because most of them are trying to detox from social media services themselves.

However, there is also this stupid wave of people new telling me that I "must" have an Instragram account, as if Instragram is this newer and better thing. But for the life of me, I never used FB to begin with so their sales pitch of more of Mark Z's garbage never really worked on me.

Anyway back to Instagram. Isn't IG the same shitty thing where you take a photo, upload it and a bunch of users (hailed friends) which aren't really friends because you haven't spoken in 15 years get a chance to "like" and comment about your photo and then everyone moves the fuck on? I know IG is supposed to have this filter feature which makes the photo look a bit different but I'm pretty sure isn't anything that ground breaking. But is there something we're missing here? Or is it just another way for FB to sell ads?

As for the wife's profile I was able to get her to clamp down on its use. After convincing her that her friend's cousin who she met five years ago at some some party who she friended doesn't need to see photos of her from 10 years ago when she went to France and stood in front of the the Louvre for six hours trying to get the fuck in. So what she did was restricted all the friends and unfollowed all of their boring shit because frankly, when my wifes friends cousin posted a pic of her standing out the front of the the Louvre for six hours and we found it really hard to give a shit so decided that Facebook was a total waste of everyones time to begin with and we needed to reduce the painstaking push notifications that came into to her phone 40 times a day.

Now as for a useful social media platform Whatsapp does seem practical because in the country we live where Whatsapp serves as a replacement to SMS. But we can really call that "social media" or is just anything that people use to talk on that isn't considered a phone called social media now?

Jeff Wise has long claimed that MH370 was hijacked by Putin and flown North, in an elaborate "spoof".

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Nevermind your opinion of the Daily Mail - in this case, it nailed the story.

Story for you. Its about the DNC servers (which may have been wiped?)

Summary...
The DNC said their servers were hacked. They REFUSED to let FBI/CIA look at their servers, but paid a company Crowd Strike to look at them. Crowd Strike is run by someone with a personal vendetta against Putin. Crowd Strike said their was 100% proof on servers Russia hacked them. Crowd Strike ALWAYS says Russia hacked servers they look at and they have been caught lying before.

TODAY... Crowd Strike REFUSES to say Russia hacked the DNC servers. That means... There is not a SINGLE PERSON who looked at the DNC servers that is willing to say Russia hacked them. Not a SINGLE person in the world is willing to say this under oath. The FBI doesn't have a shred of evidence, a single witness, nothing.

Recent FBI heads...
Robert Muller - Investigated Russia in the Uranium One deai, said nothing once he learned Clinton was making millions on the deal.
Rosenstein - Worked specifically on the Uranium One deal investigation, said nothing.
Comey - Used FBI resources to help do opposition research on Trump during the election for Clinton's behalf

Is this a FUCKING JOKE? I have seen James Bond villains that would say this is too corrupt.

The DNC is nothing but corruption and fucking over the middle class. If it doesn't involve one of those two, the DNC isn't involved.

The same principles that covered PRISM https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... ?
When the next funding call for self healing, self configuring, self directed drones goes out?
Just say no thanks to that UAV, UAS, UGS, UMS, USV, UUV request?
Lethal autonomous weapon and "Directive 3000.09, Autonomy in weapon systems"
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
"Military drones set to get stronger chemical weapons and could soon make their OWN decisions during missions (3 January 2014)"
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...
The "Unmanned Systems Integrated Roadmap"

Usually it's those casinos on the reservations that seem to have the reputation for having a slot machine that was faulty when it made a payout on those networked machines. But it happens in other places:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

http://www.chicagotribune.com/...

https://www.onlinecasinoselite...

The UK was proposing that anyone flying should be able to deposit their carry on luggage ie laptops and smartphones for security checks while the passengers go through duty free and do a bit of shopping. then pick the items afterwards.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

I bet those suckers are rather lightweight and will shatter when almost anything solid impacts them

4 small props spinning fast enough to move a human and itself in that manner will certainly be enough to cut through human material. A 6 lb RC helicopter went clean through a guy's skull.

Many on the left would love to decriminalize sex work. I think if you look at opinion-pieces on this, you'll find virtually everyone for legalization to be either a libertarian or a liberal.

It's a real mixed bag. There are a lot of mid-30's early 40's and even later educated women who are having a hellava time finding men to marry and start a family with. They have pretty high standards for a male, and the situation with men avoiding college has meant a lot of women for not all that many men. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/fem....

It's sort of a unintentionally humorous piece, with the women in the article wondering why they can't get a man, but resorting to the old tactic of degrading men. Ant the lead-in to the article notes that these women are sassy. Sassy is rude and argumentative. I'm not certain where today's women go tthe idea that being rude and argumentative was attractive.

While I'm not into hookers, there is no question that they are financially less taxing than a wife and children.

And that is why a lot of women on the left and center of the spectrum are against it. It is a competitive disadvantage, and it gets worse for them as they age. Many are freezing eggs because they can't find a man that is acceptable to them to breed with. I don't know if that's going to actually work.

People like to wax poetic about free speech and freedom of speech, but most people don't understand it nor have ever researched what it is, and how it differs from anarchy and chaos.

First of all, there is no free speech in private spaces. Whenever you are using a social media service, blog commenting system, internet forum, webpage hosted by a provider, among several other spaces on the Internet your speech is limited to what has been stipulated on terms of services, policies and other contracts that you agreed to when you opened an account.
It's always been this way, and this won't change. If you think you have some right to free speech in some service you are using on the Internet, you are wrong.

The concept of Freedom of Speech was created for, and applies strictly to public spaces. It was created to preserve the rights of people and journalists to criticize the government, period. It is in good standards for democratic societies in general, and private companies in these societies tries to follow the idea as close as possible, but it is not guaranteed.
On the other hand, a whole metric ton of laws were made involving speech to bar everything from human rights violations to general prejudice, hatred, targeting, unjust enrichment, among others. In fact, most democratic countries in the world today have specific laws against racism, prejudice against minorities, symbols related to parties and ideologies with historial ties to hatred and prejudice, incitation to hatred, among others. US is kind of an outlier in this because there are grey areas in law, but a white supremacist in most countries would end up in jail depending on their public attitude.

Particularly for ads and offers of products and services the law is already there. False advertising applies to miracle cures and diets. The problem is on monitoring and application of the law, as well as exploitation of loopholes in law.
It is impossible to monitor and punish everyone that comes up with bullshit on the Internet, the solution for that is critical reasoning and a society that is better educated and better apt to detect bullshit and better select their sources. The problem here is not what is permissible in society as a whole, the problem is people who keeps promoting, reading content, and using sources that has blatantly lied in the past, continues spewing crap without any basis, build their discourse on bullshit, and keeps being supported by ignorant masses who cannot take minutes of their time to properly research what they are swallowing whole.

We cannot expect every social network to monitor and classify everything their users put up on a daily basis. It's not humanly possible. I don't think people realize how many posts, videos and photos are uploaded every minute on these social networks... here's an approximation from 4 years ago:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...

We're talking about hundreds of thousands of posts every minute on Facebook. Close to 100 hours of video on YouTube. 300 blog posts on Wordpress alone. 500 new websites. Every minute of every single day.
There are not enough people in the world to curate all this, so these companies need to use algorithms, which will never be perfect for the job. In fact, for them to be even close to good they'd need to be running on a computational level close to a human brain, which we are still far far faaaaar away from achieving.

The rush against fake news, spam, neo nazis, hate speech, and all the stuff that has been sensationalized just recently has always been there on some level. It's the whole problem of having few news sources that can be heavily scrutinized and monitored versus everyone being a potential source of information.

And all the stuff social network companies have been doing recently is all welcome, but it's also at most a stop gap solution. No matter how much

Let me please answer your troll. First, interbreeding would be between humans and animals ; and regarding mixed-race relations, please have a read at this interesting article ; an excerpt, for starters:

Mixed-race relationships are making us taller and smarter: Children born to genetically diverse parents are more intelligent than their ancestors

Sure, that explains all the mulatto Nobel Prize winners...

Oh, wait....

Mixed-race relationships are making us taller and smarter: Children born to genetically diverse parents are more intelligent than their ancestors

According to this article:

Nikki Leynor, Senior Vice President of Remarkable Media, the imagineering company who constructed the unique ship, told IGN the machine was made out of 'a truss skeleton and a custom built network of LEDs for this event,' and would be disassembled following the flight.

The colorful LED lights were attached to spaceship, which was said to be roughly 50 feet in length and assisted by a Black Hawk helicopter.

I wonder if this drone strike occurred during a practice run?

So the sales figures you posted *yesterday*, are already significantly different *today*?

Fist bump, bro!

Good old creimer, fertilizer salesman extraordinaire!

commercial neighborhood in a big city

Well run power utilities don't use poles in urban areas any more. Concrete or otherwise. Figuring out how this is lost on hurricane prone Puerto Rico or whatever mismanaged part of Florida you hail from is an exercise I'll leave you to work on.

Here is one of your concrete poles splayed out on the road like the ghetto crap that it is. The wood one is probably in the Gulf somewhere. These knuckleheads will be in the dark until December and it will be the US proper that has to foot the bill. That power company was $9 BILLION in debt before the hurricane wiped it out.

At least maybe this will provide an opportunity to involve some grownups in the matter.

Hacking banks could allow them to move money to circumvent those sanctions. That is when banks aren't outright collaborating with them to do so. Lets say you are right though, and they don't have any willing trade partners who would trade with them despite sanctions. Why then, do we keep hearing about them making continued efforts to dodge sanctions to avoid trade restrictions? It isn't like there isn't a precedent for countries ignoring sanctions against them.

if a child does not learn to see by a certain age, they will never be able to perceive even if they regain their sight later in life

You are grossly ignorant about such things.

Hey, did you hear the one about the Marine who died in a bar fight ?

Sure, you may shoot a couple three, but do you think you can reload before the rest beat you into a grease stain?

(It's okay, I know the military brainwashed you to believe you're invincible. It's not your fault.)

have rejected the death penalty for all crimes except the very most serious.

And yet murderers, mass murderers, rapists, child rapists, and many others are not executed but instead coddled for decades at the taxpayer expense.

Obviously society doesn't consider any of the above as serious crimes or these criminals would be executed. And before you bring up the tired, "Capital punishment doesn't deter crime", it's not about deterring crime. It's about getting rid of people who have chosen not to live within the bounds of a civilized society and not murder or rape others.

"Mozilla is exceptionally bad."

Is Microsoft intentionally destroying Firefox? Mozilla Foundation is practically owned by Microsoft, through Yahoo:

When Google stopped paying Mozilla Foundation $300,000,000 each year (Dec. 22, 2011), Mozilla Foundation took money from Yahoo to sneakily "update" Firefox so that it uses "Yahoo search". Yahoo search is actually Microsoft's Bing search. A quote from Marissa:

"I'm thrilled to announce that we've entered into a five-year partnership with Mozilla to make Yahoo the default search experience on Firefox across mobile and desktop," Yahoo Chief Executive Marissa Mayer said in a blog post Wednesday. "This is the most significant partnership for Yahoo in five years."

Now, somehow, the Firefox and Thunderbird user interfaces have been degraded. Firefox no longer allows making a duplicate tab from a tab; it is necessary to right-click on a web page to make a duplicate; that doesn't work well because it is necessary to find a place on the web page that is not a link.

Thunderbird and SeaMonkey composer now have the Save-As bug.

Microsoft paid Yahoo. Yahoo paid Mozilla Foundation to trick users into using Microsoft's Bing search engine. And now Mozilla Foundation is apparently allowing the degradation of its products. Apparently Microsoft wants Firefox and Thunderbird to be degraded that so there will be more users of Microsoft's browser and email software.

The sneaky tactic is not working: American Firefox users dump Yahoo and go back to Google. (January 13, 2015)

Then: Yahoo's Incredible Shrinking Profitability In Its Core Business (Forbes, March 1, 2015).

Yahoo has been EXTREMELY badly managed:

After Terry Semel, and before Marissa Meyer, there were 5 Yahoo CEOs who stayed less than 2 years each.

Nothing has changed, apparently. Marissa Mayer's second-in-command 'leaves with $109m' on being fired from Yahoo after just 15 months. (January 16, 2014) The rapid changes in management continue, that time with a $109,000,000 loss for Yahoo. (What management arrangement allowed a poor manager, someone who was so bad he was fired, to make $7,266,666 per month?)

Maybe that explains the bad management of Mozilla Foundation. It is possible the story needs updating.

If only bacteria could be engineered to eat this shit...

Hell yeah... evolution!

Newly-evolved microbes may be breaking down the plastics polluting our oceans

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...

My guess is that most of them would accept monopoly money if it was in combination with a first-edition of the monopoly game.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

scarcity of a popular item equals value.

Fire burning all day in building 7 ultimately weakened it enough that the floors began collapsing: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

You cite the Daily Fail as evidence? Really?

Fire burning all day in building 7 ultimately weakened it enough that the floors began collapsing: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Hmm. I'm aware of the potential for action around the emoluments clause, the rest I haven't encountered yet.

You've seen it on TV, and what you haven't seen, the FBI is investigating.

Create this slide.

Apparently Jordan and India would be their best bets for a like-minded domain... well, if a daily mail article can be accurate on occasion: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

That was a start. I see I have to supply the supplemental material. Fair enough.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sci...
https://www.newscientist.com/a...

Physics behind it - http://www.earth-climate.com/

A site that has put together a whole lot of research - https://realclimatescience.com...

How did we get here? A D science student from Harvard -

https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Once you look at this stuff, it's hard to not see he fraud that has been put upon us at great expense. So the question is - will you allow yourself to be fooled again by guys like Al Gore?

There is already an app for that. You've been beat to the market, so your valuation wil be lucky to break $1 billion, let alone $100 billion...

Oh yes, every Mr Olympia bodybuilder will tell you that afternoon naps are critical for gaining muscle mass.... eyeroll

creimer

Here is the story explaining the evidence of Russian hackers.

In short... The DNC refused to let FBI see their servers. They paid a private company, Crowdstrike, to "investigate" who said it was the Russians. Crowdstrike got into trouble making that claim in Ukraine in similar circumstances. Since then they went back and are unwilling to say Russians did it anymore or under oath.

So, in summary, there isn't a SINGLE person who has seen the DNC servers willing to say Russia hacked them. There is not a single witness, shred of evidence, or even hint that they have that will hold up in court. It looks like a lie, and from the history of Crowdstrike, it is likely a lie.

That is why you havn't seen any evidence.

Fun fact, not only is it not proven that Russia hacked the DNC. There isn't a SINGLE witness who has analysed the DNC hacked servers that is willing to say Russia did it while under oath.

Thats right kiddies. Not only have they not shown proof, but they don't have a single expert willing to say it happened. I know you think the FBI and NSA are on it, but under oath Comey said the FBI did not look at DNC servers and only Crowdstrike did, and Crowdstrike is now unwilling to say Russia did it. When asked why he thought Russia did it, I shit you not, Comey replied "It just makes sense". Yep, even Comey knows its a lie.

It's not just street signs. I've seen double decker buses decorated with advertising in the style of street signs and other vehicles:
http://l450v.alamy.com/450v/cb...

http://www.atmediaoutdoor.com/...
http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/42e4...
http://www.edinphoto.org.uk/0_...
Some countries actually hire artists to decorate roads and buildings with optical illusion style art:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tra...

As for the often stated claim that no one wants a late term abortion, and no doctor performs one unless medically necessary, remember Dr Gosnell.

When your counter-example is someone engaging in felonious behavior, you might as well be citing Orville Lynn Majors as an argument against Euthanasia.

The most your argument supports is the desirability of a modifier such as "competent" or "reasonable" instead.

That's really relying too much on pedantry.

The problem with your opinion here is that you are still forcing some subset of women to carry a child to term, and insisting you have a right over the woman's body. To the hardcore feminists and their apologists, you are just as wrong as any pro-lifer.

There's no problem with it. In fact, these "hardcore feminists and their apologists" are hardly an issue, they tend to exist only in the form of straw-persons, and are responsible for far less harm than even the folks who bombarded the Great Ormond Street Hospital with their hate.

This is why the pro-life groups ask if a woman should be allowed to have an abortion one day before her due date. Two days? One week? etc. The usual response is deflection rather than a yes or no answer.

Trump. Of course, when their hysteria is exposed, they usually increase it by screaming even more loudly about murdering babies.

By the way, I have to point out that I am not pro-choice or pro-life. I am agnostic on this topic. I just get tired of the bad arguments and lack of logic I see on both sides.

And yours are equally tiresome.