Domain: reference.com
Stories and comments across the archive that link to reference.com.
Comments · 9,372
-
Re:I'd suggest a dictionary
I'd suggest you get a dictionary yourself.
Try this link for example: Dictionary.com says gifted can mean 'to present something as a gift to' or 'to endow with' and cites the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. -
Re:I'd suggest a dictionary
I'd suggest you get a dictionary yourself.
Try this link for example: Dictionary.com says gifted can mean 'to present something as a gift to' or 'to endow with' and cites the American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. -
Re:Why pay? It's ad-supported!
Dubious:
1. Fraught with uncertainty or doubt; undecided. -
Deinstall?
Is deinstalling anything like uninstalling? Or did you mean one of the following?:
Reinstall
reinstall
install
Dean's stall -
Deinstall?
Is deinstalling anything like uninstalling? Or did you mean one of the following?:
Reinstall
reinstall
install
Dean's stall -
Deinstall?
Is deinstalling anything like uninstalling? Or did you mean one of the following?:
Reinstall
reinstall
install
Dean's stall -
Deinstall?
Is deinstalling anything like uninstalling? Or did you mean one of the following?:
Reinstall
reinstall
install
Dean's stall -
Deinstall?
Is deinstalling anything like uninstalling? Or did you mean one of the following?:
Reinstall
reinstall
install
Dean's stall -
Deinstall?
Is deinstalling anything like uninstalling? Or did you mean one of the following?:
Reinstall
reinstall
install
Dean's stall -
Re:Watch out CmdrTaco!
We just recognize the infallibly of men
If men were infalliable we wouldn't have a problem. Might you have meant fallibly? -
Re:Is this the best you can do?
proscribe, 1: To denounce or condemn.
Here's a quick hint for you, don't use words you can't spell. Maybe you meant to say prescribe, to set down as a rule or guide; enjoin, to order the use of (a medicine or other treatment).
Now that I've gotten that over with: Mac minis are expensive and proprietary. The memory is not even a user-serviceable part, in terms of your warranty. (Look it up!) The ONLY good thing about it is the cool form factor. It has very limited expansion (even down to having only 1 1394 port) and is only $499 with the most limited hardware and no peripherals. If you want a machine for the looks, buy a mini. However, most of the software that most people want to run out there runs either on Linux, in which case there is no benefit to the Mini beyond the aesthetic, or on Windows, in which case the Mini can't help you.
-
Re:I was unclear about YARV. Let me clarifyKnow your latin: i.e.: "id est" or "that is" e.g.: "exempli gratia" or "for example"
To which I'd like to add, "et cetera: et = and, cetera = the rest" . There is no work "eck" in the Latin language, and the phrase "Eck cetera" is nonsense. And you sound stupid if you say it. And, while I'm on the subject, there are two "s"s in the word asterisk. It's not an asterick, even if you verb it.
The fact that bringing ignorance to the attention of the general populace is considered worse than being ignorant itself is a sure sign that we've reached a period of pure intellectual unenlightenment - the second dark ages hath begun. Well, Paradox, let me be the first to stand behind you in solidarity in the battle against stupidity and deliberate ignorance.
-
Re:Say what?Doesn't read like a Gartner-style MS schill to me
Just because they're not a Microsoft shill, doesn't mean they're not a shill. Who would care about open source databases? Maybe Oracle, IBM (DB2), etc?
-
Re:Great!Hmm, looks like you got me
... sort of. From Dictionary.com:Usage Note: The verb loan is well established in American usage and cannot be considered incorrect. The frequent objections to the form by American grammarians may have originated from a provincial deference to British critics, who long ago labeled the usage a typical Americanism. Loan is, however, used to describe only physical transactions, as of money or goods; for figurative transactions, lend is correct: Distance lends enchantment. The allusions lend the work a classical tone.
I was taught in school that "loan" is a noun while "lend" is the only verb you can use in any case. Mind you, I'm Canadian, and apparently you guys reject the use of "eh" as well (go figger)... :) -
Re:Sloppy editing strikes again
Well, a quick Google search led me to these:
http://owl.english.purdue.edu/handouts/esl/esliart .html
http://www.englishrules.com/writing/2005/a-versus- an-the.php
http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~jlynch/Writing/a.htm l
http://www.rhlschool.com/eng2n26.htm
http://dictionary.reference.com/help/faq/language/ a/a-or-an.html
http://www.english-zone.com/grammar/a-anlessn.html
None of those say a thing about paying attention to the initial sound of the following noun. All of them, however, mention paying attention to the initial sound of the following word. -
Re:Conservative?
I think your defintions are a bit off.
Conservates want to make things like they used to be (or keep them as they are). Liberals want change.
-
Re:Conservative?
I think your defintions are a bit off.
Conservates want to make things like they used to be (or keep them as they are). Liberals want change.
-
Solution: Thinkgeek has fop tools
fop: A man who is preoccupied with and often vain about his clothes and manners; a dandy.
-
Napoleon Complex
Seriously... I'm 6'5", which means that I'm taller than a good 95% of the people that I meet.
Being 5'6" myself, and ectomorphic in physique as well, I know all to well what you're talking about. I'm invisible. In any group setting, the "Alpha Male" is never me by default. If I am required to take a leadership role, I have to earn it, every time - it's never given to me. Having been small my entire life, I've observed the phenomena you're talking about keenly - from the other side. Fortunately, being an introverted geek I prefer invisibility anyway. I'd like to think I'm well-adjusted, however I've known other Lilliputian fellows with severe Napoleon complexes; you know the type, small and diminuative they demand attention and are generally the worst pricks you'll ever meet. -
Re:Blame the terrorists.Yes, it's cheap. It's an attention-getting ploy designed to instill fear and make you pay attention to their cause.
Why's that sound so familiar? http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=terroris
m /That being said, it's still a valid concern.
-
Re:Professor mistakes
Funny, I would think you would have noticed someone being conspicuous about it...
-
Re:/dev/null
"Are you allowed to have weapons? Yes? Then why would regulating the types of arms Joe Trigger-Happy can aquire be a breach of the second amendment?"
I didn't say the Amendment was violated, just that the right it grants is abridged more often, i.e. the exceptions happen more frequently.
I specifically said I didn't want to argue whether the exceptions were a good thing or not. I guess guns are one of those touchy subjects.
My point was that there are a lot more weapons you can't own than things you can't say. That's all.
-
Re:Since when...
-
not malfunction?
I love it. How are "not functioning pixels" "not a sign of malfunction"?
I've bought well over a dozen LCD montitors from Apple, Dell, and Philips in recent months and I have not seen a single dead pixel on any of them.
This is just a case of Sony reducing cost by widening manufacturing tolerances. It's fine as long as you manage expectations properly. -
Re:This is just what open sauce needs.thesaurii and dictionaries can help.
Let's try one and see.
Hey! You're right! Whaddaya know about that? -
Re:This is pretty exciting.
In addition to being the penultimate search engine, Google is becoming quite feature-rich as well. It's pretty interesting to realize the subtle way in which they've risen to the top by simply providing what people want -- no more, no less -- in this age when we are saturated with online advertising on every other Internet site.
Penultimate mean next to last ...
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=penultima te -
Re:No clue
Point noted, jackanapes.
-
Re:This is pretty exciting.In addition to being the penultimate search engine
Google is the next to last search engine?
-
Re:Duplicate!
for what it's worth i think they have left the Finder behind from the rest of the OS and needs some genius inspiration to make it noteworthy
I don't think I understand what you're saying. Do you mean that the finder is a holdover from OS 9 (and earlier Mac OSes)? That it's development hasn't kept up with the rest of the OS?
Your other point:
Have you ever engaged in an argument with a creationist? They tend to copy and paste arguments from various creationist apologia sites, and rarely offer any substantive arguments, instead shifting from one point to the next without answering objections. (I know, it's like the special olympics, and I'm still retarded.)
I think most Mac trolls are similar, repeating the same tired arguments almost ceaselessly, although I don't know of any central Mac troll bullshit repository (other than the Kottke thing, which is actually my favorite). Maybe slashdot is that repository? -
Re:Ironic...Them: "Irony is the statement of one thing when another thing (typically the opposite) was intended."
You: "That's not irony, it's sarcasm. Slashdotters are freaking brilliant. (Pop quiz: Is that irony or sarcasm?)"
Slashdotters also apparently can't be bothered to look up words in the dictionary.
The post you were replying to was right. However, sarcasm has a similar meaning. Irony tends to be more subtle, while sarcasm tends to be cutting and in your face. You can find a decent if imperfect discussion of the difference between the words here.
-
Re:robots or R/C?
The dictionary says:
robot
n.- A mechanical device that sometimes resembles a human and is capable of performing a variety of often complex human tasks on command or by being programmed in advance.
- A machine or device that operates automatically or by remote control.
- A person who works mechanically without original thought, especially one who responds automatically to the commands of others.
I belive both options can be categorized as robots.
----------
+1 Research for the lazy -
Re:Legal Avenues
It's not. See Speech
-
Re:However...they ARE claiming copyright.
Thats called plagiarism.
-
"Scapegoat" is not a verb
I usually don't bother with grammar errors, but "going to scapegoat"? Come on.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language: scapegoat (skap'got) n.
WordNet ® 2.0: scapegoat n
The Collaborative International Dictionary of English: Scapegoat Scape"goat`, n.
-
Re:Not enough - write Mass. Govt.!"...using proper English grammer and spelling."
-
Re:Fossils and Creation
The Bible is right.
" not fossilisation, that's just burial."
You're right - it's burial in sandstone. My point is rapid rock formation can occur in a few decades, not just millions of years. So a dinosaur that died (shock, horror) 6000 years ago could have a bone embedded in sandstone.
"when you find a bone with the calcium lattice filled with, or replaced by, minerals ..."
The the dictionary meaning of fossil just defines it as traces of organic life embedded in the earth's crust. As the article says: " The finding certainly shows fossilization does not proceed as science had assumed, Schweitzer said. "
"In other words, all ancient fossils will give a more or less random date between 30 and 40 thousand years old."...""time signiture" given by the background radiation absorbed by the fossil"
Can you provide a link: I thought Carbon 14 is no longer absorbed once a living entity dies.? -
Re:Yes.
Oh my, that is pretty terrible
It appears that "slough" pronounced "sloo" and "slough" pronounced "sluf" are the true originals. They also have very different meanings. I'll admit that personally, I have never seen the "sloo" meaning used in text.
I'll make a note that if I ever have to use the "sloo" version of "slough", to make sure not to use "slew" or "slue" instead.
Bleh. That's terrible. You can bet it all came from people who were too lazy to learn to spell correctly. *ducks* -
Re:I disagreeFrom Dictionary.com
ab-bre-vi-a-tion
is 'U' shorter than what it represents? Check.
n.
1. The act or product of shortening.
2. A shortened form of a word or phrase used chiefly in writing to represent the complete form, such as Mass. for Massachusetts or USMC for United States Marine Corps.
Is 'l8r' shorter than what it represents? Yup.
In other words "U" and "l8r" are not abbreviations BECAUSE YOU SAY SO. Bull. They are ways of shortening often used phrases in nonstandard ways (well, at least nonstandard compared to how most abbreviations happen nowadays).
People (not just children) are finding themselves in a new environment . Some people do not type fast, and these help. Others are "creative" and find ways to make the medium of communication into something it was not initially designed for.
Didn't people complain (I still can't stand it till this day) when they started calling Kentucky Fried Chicken 'KFC'? They even have JBXs now in some places (upscale Jack in the Boxes). So why is it ok to abbreviate things in "the standard way" now?
"Proper use of abbreviaitons" my ass. Personally I don't think abbreviations are "proper" at all. But they have their place, and so does netspeak. -
bad diction: Nip it in the bud
Not sure you concord with anyone.
If you're using Firefox, you might try using the following smart bookmark: dict
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=concord -
Re:There is no such thing as X Windows. its ..SYST
%nbsp;" Your post will not impact on the way people use language. Irregardless, they will still say "X-Windows"."
Nor apparently on the way they use the word "Irregardless" -
Re:There is no such thing as X Windows. its ..SYST
Your post will not impact on the way people use language. Irregardless, they will still say "X-Windows".
Will my post impact the way people use language, especially as it pertains to the word irregardless?
-
Re:Using knoppix in a bank........ which surely beats having gash
one more reason why Qt is superior to Gtk
-
Re:Not badI do not think that word "compile" means what you think it means.
Maybe. Maybe not. I think it means option 3 on this link. The Poster was complaining about the amount of time it took to "compile". I was pointing out that there are multiple reasons why it takes apps a long time to compile, not just chip speed.
-
Re:SighPiracy has meant copyright infringement (and illegal radio transmitter use) now for many decades, if not, in the former case, centuries. Complaining that it dishonours victims of "real" pirates (sea mobsters) to use it in this way is a little like complaining that using the word "rape" to describe the yellow crop farmed to create canola oil dishonours victims of the violent offense also associated with that word.
Like it or not, piracy - in the English language - has more than one meaning.
-
Re:Which Tetris patent are you talking about?Using a slashdot user's rule of thumb to identify appropriate grammar is like using Michael Jackson to watch your kids after school. In short, don't be absurd. As the Chicago Manual of Style, Strunk and White and Fowler's Modern English all clearly agree, the past tense of the verb "to copyright" is "copywritten."
On the other hand, Merriam-Webster , American Heritage Dictionary, and, heck, even Dictionary.com , which aggregates entries from entirely too many useless sources, say that "copywritten" isn't a word.
This makes sense, since right and write have different meanings. Even though copyrights were originally put into place for written materials, it is still a right, not a write.
-
Re:Stops the RIAA...
Windows are holes!
From Windows
# An opening constructed in a wall or roof that functions to admit light or air to an enclosure and is often framed and spanned with glass mounted to permit opening and closing. -
Re:This is soon to fall.
Dictionary.com the standard firefox install shows a popup (sometimes?)...some extensions probably manage to block it and it doesn't work if you turn off the Flash player I believe.
-
Re:Uhhh
I think I'll create a game called Polygamy. It'll be like Monopoly, but instead of buying houses you buy women.
-
Re:I thought....A lot of people think that their ideas, procedures, processes, etc... are (or can be) protected by copyright. The answer here is - no
Wrong. It comes down to the definition of "idea". Prehaps you don't know what "idea" means- prehaps you don't know how all-ecompassingly generic it is:- 1. Something, such as a thought or conception, that potentially or actually exists in the mind as a product of mental activity.
Absolutely anything you could read off one page, repeat in your brain, and then write on another page fits that description. Depending on your memorization skills, any kind of intellectual property is covered by that, and much else besides.
A lot of people think that their ideas, procedures, processes, etc... are (or can be) protected by copyright. The answer here is - no
For a similar level of truth, I might say that "Killing animals is not murder". That isn't true in general, and might be right or wrong in any particular instance, depending on whether or not the animal is of the species homo sapiens, and if there are other extenuating circumstances (war, self-defense, state-sponsored execution, etc).
Not all ideas can necessarily be copyrighted, but SOME ideas can be (others can be patented or trademarked). Superman and Luke Skywalker are both copyrighted and trademarked, even though they are inarguably the products of mental action, or "ideas".
Tangibles => copyrights
Intanigbles => patents
Oversimplified so much that it's necessarily wrong. Many totally intangible things are copyrighted. I wonder if this is another case of you lacking a definition, this time of "intangible". (Hint: by definition, all software is intangible. If it were tangible, it would be hardware). Furthermore, pork futures are intangible too, and they're not patentable! (although they are ownable as simple property) -
Re:I thought....A lot of people think that their ideas, procedures, processes, etc... are (or can be) protected by copyright. The answer here is - no
Wrong. It comes down to the definition of "idea". Prehaps you don't know what "idea" means- prehaps you don't know how all-ecompassingly generic it is:- 1. Something, such as a thought or conception, that potentially or actually exists in the mind as a product of mental activity.
Absolutely anything you could read off one page, repeat in your brain, and then write on another page fits that description. Depending on your memorization skills, any kind of intellectual property is covered by that, and much else besides.
A lot of people think that their ideas, procedures, processes, etc... are (or can be) protected by copyright. The answer here is - no
For a similar level of truth, I might say that "Killing animals is not murder". That isn't true in general, and might be right or wrong in any particular instance, depending on whether or not the animal is of the species homo sapiens, and if there are other extenuating circumstances (war, self-defense, state-sponsored execution, etc).
Not all ideas can necessarily be copyrighted, but SOME ideas can be (others can be patented or trademarked). Superman and Luke Skywalker are both copyrighted and trademarked, even though they are inarguably the products of mental action, or "ideas".
Tangibles => copyrights
Intanigbles => patents
Oversimplified so much that it's necessarily wrong. Many totally intangible things are copyrighted. I wonder if this is another case of you lacking a definition, this time of "intangible". (Hint: by definition, all software is intangible. If it were tangible, it would be hardware). Furthermore, pork futures are intangible too, and they're not patentable! (although they are ownable as simple property)