Slashdot Mirror


Anti-Piracy Bureau of Sweden Planted Evidence

American Sweden writes "Concerning the bust at the Swedish ISP Bahnhof on March 10, IDG Sweden is reporting that Bahnhof has posted their findings of an internal inspection. It seems as if the Anti-Piracy Buereau of Sweden and their infiltrator "Rouge" had a good deal of involvement in supporting the busted FTP server not only with hardware but with so called "warez" as well. The blog of Lars Backlund has a translated version of the interview conducted in the report of Bahnhof." P2PNet.net has a breakdown of the relevant details as well. From the article: "As it turns out, APB (or, rather, their hired informer) supplied the servers and uploaded copyrighted materials. So that's why they were so sure to find stuff, they put it there!"

346 comments

  1. On this occasion... by brouski · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think an "OH SNAP!" is appropriate.

    --
    Proud member of the American Non Sequitur Society. We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!
    1. Re:On this occasion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh no you di'in't!

    2. Re:On this occasion... by jpmoney · · Score: 1

      No, that phrase is [i]never[/i] appropriate.

      Lame =).

      --
      unf.
    3. Re:On this occasion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean Non sequitur?

    4. Re:On this occasion... by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      We might not make much sense, but boy do we love pizza!

      That doesn't follow...

    5. Re:On this occasion... by Iblis · · Score: 5, Funny

      People should have realized this when they found the file called "All yör båse are belöng tö us" among the warez...

      --
      "Free" as in "free 'undred quid".
    6. Re:On this occasion... by op00to · · Score: 1

      No, you're wrong. That's never appropriate.

    7. Re:On this occasion... by WoBIX · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot the "bork bork bork" at the end.

  2. Only in America.... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh, wait...

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Only in America.... by Elkboy · · Score: 1

      I think you can trace the hardline anti-pirate policy of the media industry back to the US, so there's room for a little US-bashing even here.

    2. Re:Only in America.... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Back in my day, you had to dress up like an Arab and hire a yacht if you wanted to entrap somebody, and we liked it that way!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    3. Re: Only in America.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember you! Say, what was the outcome of that little incident with those Stingers, the wife of the Salvadoran ambassador and that trawler full of Laotian opium? Gosh, those were the days...

    4. Re:Only in America.... by crotherm · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, you had to have silver hair, build Stainless Steal cars, and a penchant for nose candy if you were going to be entrapped, and we hated it that way.

      --
      "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible, make violent revolution inevitable" - JFK
    5. Re:Only in America.... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      JD, 1925 - 2005, RIP

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    6. Re: Only in America.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not aware of any such operation, and if I was, I wouldn't be at liberty to say.

      Now I'm going to have to kill you. Not because you know too much, but just cause I like to stay in practice.

      =)

    7. Re:Only in America.... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      But then you would be saying that the government of Sweden where the obedient toadies of the US media companies.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Only in America.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I for one welcome our new US Media Company Overlords....

      Sorry, had to say it.

    9. Re:Only in America.... by Elkboy · · Score: 1

      A lot of people, nations and organizations bow to the almighty dolla, whether the want it or not. While US media companies might not export their influence per se, they do export the idea of how to protect their interests through aggressive legal action.

  3. ah-HA !! by jpiggot · · Score: 5, Funny
    So THAT explains why all those bootleg "ABBA" records were on that server !!

    Man, it's always the innocent and blond that suffer.

    1. Re:ah-HA !! by forceflow2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, I think the people who downloaded the ABBA suffered

    2. Re:ah-HA !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No self-respecting swede would pirate ABBA!

      They'd already have bought the album.

    3. Re:ah-HA !! by mbrewthx · · Score: 1

      In North Korea only old people download ABBA...

      --
      __________ Leave me alone I'm compiling a RPG II program on my S/36...Thanks to metamucil I'm a Regular Meta Moderator
    4. Re:ah-HA !! by Hansu · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia ABBA downloads YOU!

      I guess this covers just about all...
      Oh, and I for one welcome our new evidence planting ABBA overlords.

      --
      .signature: Command not found
    5. Re:ah-HA !! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 4, Funny

      I believe it will be the Waterloo of the Anti-Piracy Comission's battles. For the rest of their existance they will be asking the courts to "Take a chance on me."

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    6. Re:ah-HA !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot: People download Abba via P2P... in Japan!

      And:

      1. Download Abba.
      2. ???
      3. Profit!

    7. Re:ah-HA !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they had to do the same again,
      they would.
      - your friend,
      Fernando.

    8. Re:ah-HA !! by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      All of you suck (hot grits off of a petrified Natalie Portman), but you made me laugh.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    9. Re:ah-HA !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually ah-HA is a Norwegian band.

    10. Re:ah-HA !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you change your mind
      I'm the first in line
      Honey i'll be free...
      cause you planted evidence on me!

      You can't leave town that's a big big no
      Your passport is flagged, and you'll be boned!
      You should have known, what the logs have shown.
      That you planeted vvarezz and you'll be stoned!

      Bo bo bo bo bork, bo bo bo bo bork
      Honey i'll be free!
      you planted evidence on me!
      Was that your very best, did you even try?
      You couldn't deleted the logs, now your ass is mine!

      Bo bo bo bo bork, bo bo bo bo boo bork
      Your cell has no loo... ...gotta poo in your shoe!

    11. Re:ah-HA !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      It's OOG, shithead! Where's my bourbon!?

      Now it's dark...
      </frank-booth-mode>

    12. Re:ah-HA !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it's "a-ha". (Yes, we're proud of them.)

    13. Re:ah-HA !! by tomjen · · Score: 1

      Well the winner takes it all

      --
      Freedom or George Bush
    14. Re:ah-HA !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a Natalie Portman, you insensitive clod!!

      *sigh*

  4. Just a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Keep this in mind the next time anyone suggests any kind of plan by which a government may keep escrow keys for other people's cryptographic systems...

    Or the next time a government defends about imprisoning someone without a trial, or holding tribunal-style trials where the evidence presented judicial decisions are not subject to public scrutiny...

    1. Re:Just a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, I don't disagree with you. But I feel that it would be appropriate to point out that APB is not a government organization. It's just some people that are paid by various companies, and thus APB hasn't got any more rights than anyone else here.

    2. Re:Just a thought by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful
      So here's an interesting legal issue. If an organization duly authorized by the copyright owner to help manage their copyrights places a copy of the copyrighted material on a public warez server, it seems to me that this legally qualifies as free public distribution by the copyright owner.

      So the question then becomes whether such a distribution is sufficient to have the movies in question declared to be in the public domain.... Thoughts?

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:Just a thought by say · · Score: 1

      Uhm? APB is not a government institution. It's a private group sponsored by different companies.

      --
      Roses are #FF0000, violets are #0000FF, all my base are belong to you
    4. Re:Just a thought by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Informative

      So the question then becomes whether such a distribution is sufficient to have the movies in question declared to be in the public domain.... Thoughts?

      Why the hell would it do that? Do you live in the pre-1978 era or something?

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    5. Re:Just a thought by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You mean you're not shocked, shocked, by this abuse of power? I wonder how "COINTELPRO" is pronounced in Swedish...

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    6. Re:Just a thought by paltemalte · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually APB (antipiratbyrån) is not an authority, just a lobby group. So the government was not in on this (although they happily provided the thugs/policemen to carry out the operation). Everyone including swedish mainstream media are making APB out to be crooks and dumbasses now. For once the media does something good!

      --
      Sam has one liberty, which he sacrifices for one security. Can you tell me what Sam has now?
    7. Re:Just a thought by frinkster · · Score: 0

      Why the hell would it do that? Do you live in the pre-1978 era or something?

      Copyrights must be defended. Failing to do so means you lose your copyright. By intentionally placing a copyrighted work into an area in which it can be used freely and not placing such use under the protections of a license, a very good argument can be made that the copyright owner is not practicing due diligence in the defense of their copyright and the copyright is then no longer valid.

    8. Re:Just a thought by Em+Ellel · · Score: 1

      Keep this in mind the next time anyone suggests any kind of plan by which a government may keep escrow keys for other people's cryptographic systems...

      Well, not sure what it has to do with anything as my understanding of most escrow systems is that only the decrypt keys are stored in escrow, meaning while you can READ data with escrow key, you cannot write it, and thus you cannot tamper with data. This is directly oposite of what happened in this case and reeks of FUD.

      -Em

      --
      RelevantElephants: A Somatic WebComic...
    9. Re:Just a thought by Darren+Winsper · · Score: 1

      Err....no. You're thinking of trademarks.

    10. Re:Just a thought by roystgnr · · Score: 3, Informative

      Copyrights must be defended. Failing to do so means you lose your copyright.

      No, you're thinking of trademarks.

      By intentionally placing a copyrighted work into an area in which it can be used freely and not placing such use under the protections of a license, a very good argument can be made that the copyright owner is not practicing due diligence in the defense of their copyright and the copyright is then no longer valid.

      Not anymore. There were indeed laws to the effect of "keeping your copyright requires attaching a copyright notice every time you distribute", and in fact IIRC this was one of AT&T's big problems in their anti-BSD lawsuit, but today (since the Berne Convention?) everything copyrightable you create is automatically copyrighted, and nothing other than an explicit license from the creator can waive those rights.

    11. Re:Just a thought by flossie · · Score: 1
      Copyrights must be defended. Failing to do so means you lose your copyright. By intentionally placing a copyrighted work into an area in which it can be used freely and not placing such use under the protections of a license, a very good argument can be made that the copyright owner is not practicing due diligence in the defense of their copyright and the copyright is then no longer valid.

      Congratulations! You win the award for the most wrong post ever on /.

      Trademarks need to be defended. Copyright is automatic and you cannot lose it by making work available. You can assign copyright to someone else, but the only way that work comes out of copyright is if you explicitly grant it to the public domain or die several decades beforehand.

    12. Re:Just a thought by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're slightly confused. It's Trademarks that must be vigorously defended. Copyright may be defended at leisure (within the statute of limitations, however).

      Further, this is far from cut-and-dried. Did the informer have authority to upload the material? What powers of agency (if any) did he have? (This is why it's good to use a "cut out". Plausible deniability.)

      This should be enough to get the case thrown out, one would hope, but it certainly doesn't automatically mean that the works in question automatically go into the Public Domain. Not by a long shot.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    13. Re:Just a thought by flink · · Score: 1

      Copyrights must be defended. Failing to do so means you lose your copyright.

      That applies only to trademarks. You can be as capricious as you want about enforcing your copyrights and never loose any claim to them.

    14. Re:Just a thought by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1
      If an organization duly authorized by the copyright owner to help manage their copyrights places a copy of the copyrighted material on a public warez server, it seems to me that this legally qualifies as free public distribution by the copyright owner.

      Don't be daft. Being hired to investigate violations of copyright doesn't give someone the free reign to hand out copyrighted material. "While on their payroll" doesn't mean the same thing as "with their permission".

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    15. Re:Just a thought by sicking · · Score: 2, Insightful

      APB does (most likly) not own the copyright to these files, or have permission to distribute them. So therefor they couldn't possibly turn the files into public domain.

      It does however make them copyright violators which would be an interesting twist if they got sued. However since only the copyright owners of these files can sue them I'd say that they're pretty safe.

      Whoever said that everyone is equal in the eyes of the law clearly didn't know very much law...

      --
      Failing to learn from history dooms you to repeat it.
    16. Re:Just a thought by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That'd be a bit like driving your car to the bad end of town, and leaving it there with the engine running and door open. Technically the car isn't free for the taking, (it's still your car) though it'd be easy to argue for entrapment.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    17. Re:Just a thought by naylor83 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Me tinks teh-same.

    18. Re:Just a thought by naylor83 · · Score: 1

      Hey guys: I think he is thinking of trademarks. Maybe. Anyone?

    19. Re:Just a thought by aaronl · · Score: 1

      No, but it may be enough to throw out this particular case. Just because copyrighted material is available does not give you the right to then redistribute the material.

      However, since the APB placed that material on a known distribution center, they should be responsible for the distribution. Perhaps this in effect means that they will be found to have authorized it for those particular items in this one incident. Perhaps only that they participated in an unauthorized distribution as the responsible party and are the party that would need to be prosecuted for those items.

      It would not be found in the public domain unless they released it in such a way that they would seem to have disclaimed their rights under copyright law. Or if the highest court decided differently after it gets appealed that far.

    20. Re:Just a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Everyone including swedish mainstream media are making APB out to be crooks and dumbasses now. For once the media does something good!

      Then again, they happily spew out bullshit about piracy "costing" the music industry 2 billion dollars a year (did they ask all pirates if they otherwise would have bought the music?), and refer to P2P activities as "illegal downloading" (downloading is not illegal - YET! Only unauthorised DISTRIBUTION is illegal. But we're about to get a retarded change of laws there.).

    21. Re:Just a thought by 10101001+10101001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think a more apt analogy would be parking it in the middle of a charity organization's donation tent. No amount of "bad end of town" has any direct implication that there's authorization to redistribute. A warez server, on the other hand, is specification for the intention of redistribution. The "bad end of town" would be closer to having file sharing enabled without a password and without actively advertising the file share to others. Ie, people would have to go out of their way to enable access to your things.

      --
      Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
    22. Re:Just a thought by swv3752 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It can be argued that a duly authorized agent places your copyrighted works on a server menat for wide distribution is explicitly waiving your rights.

      --
      Just a Tuna in the Sea of Life
    23. Re:Just a thought by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Although the work does not enter the public domain, as the duly appointed agents of the copyright holders put it up to be distributed on a P2P network, essentially a permanent distribution system from where it cannot be effectively removed and they were fully aware of the nature of the network at the time of uploading the works they have implicitly given permission for that copy of the works to be distributed over P2P networks for the life of the copyright of the works (after that has expired then the works enter the public domain). In any event it is the agents of the copyrights holders who now bare full legal responsibility for any perceived copyright infringement of the works in question as a result of those works having been legally distributed to a P2P network.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    24. Re:Just a thought by LuYu · · Score: 1

      That sounds like "authorized distribution" to me. In that case, can somebody please post a list of the files on that server as they have deliberately been authorized for royalty free public use by the respective organizations that funded the APB.

      Further, if their mole distributed files under copyrights owned by organizations that did not fund the APB, is the APB (or its funding organizations) liable for infingement? For instance, would the MPAA have to pay damages to the RIAA for not paying for the files the APB actively and admittedly [1] uploaded to the Internet for public distribution?

      In short: Is this a case of the MPAA violating the RIAA's (or some similar organization's) copyrights?

      MPAA Responsible for RIAA Woes... News at 11.

      [1]:

      From: peter@anti-piracy.se
      Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 9:29
      To: Tilbury, Chad; Seymour, Dan; Winter, Craig
      Subject: Swedish pirates busted!



      Hi guys!

      After 2 years of infiltrations our work finally paid of today with a successful raid on Sweden's oldest and largest ISP named Bahnhof. Bahnhof has been a source for top level piracy for several years and hosting some of the biggest and fastest servers in Europe.
      (Emphasis mine, of course)
      --
      All data is speech. All speech is Free.
    25. Re:Just a thought by Pofy · · Score: 1

      On the scale they appaearnly did, it turns into a criminal case, I would say.

    26. Re:Just a thought by dissy · · Score: 1

      > So here's an interesting legal issue. If an organization duly authorized by
      > the copyright owner to help manage their copyrights places a copy of the
      > copyrighted material on a public warez server, it seems to me that this
      > legally qualifies as free public distribution by the copyright owner.
      >
      > So the question then becomes whether such a distribution is sufficient to have
      > the movies in question declared to be in the public domain.... Thoughts?

      No.. No more than when the copyright owner allows a studio to make copys of their media and sell them in a store.

      When you buy it (or download it in this case) that never implied you bought/downloaded the same permission to distribute it as these guys may have.

      All this would -possibly- mean is the copy of the 'warez' you downloaded is legal for you to have gotten, and this is even assuming the person placing the warez there both a) DID have the permission to distribute, and b) had the permission to distribute it 'in any way' or atleast in this way specifically.

      Generally if a studio is given the right to make copies to sell in stores, that limits them to just that (and in the contract no doubt very specifically says so)
      That permission is not the same as 'oh and feel free to make free copies for yourself.' That has to be given seperatly.

      Chances are the copyright owner did not say they could distribute the materials in this way at all, making them as much of a copyright violator as those doing the downloading from the server.

      However, as I said above, even if that permission is given or arguable, that permission does not transfer to anyone else. It only means the copy you got that way was legally given to you, just as when you buy the thing in the store.

    27. Re:Just a thought by dr_d_19 · · Score: 1

      No, this is worse. This is (as Bahnhof's VP said) "like giving matches and gasoline to a known pyromaniac and then calling the police".

    28. Re:Just a thought by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You don't understand the idea of a "cut out". Instead of doing something, you hire someone to do something. Then they hire someone to do something. You don't explicitly tell them how to do it. Then, if it comes back to bite you in the ass, you have plausible deniability: your contractor or subcontractor exceeded their authority.

      Unless someone can prove that you gave explicit authority to the subcontractor, you're insulated. (Cf., Iran-Contra.)

      You do make a good point, however. If you (not the copyright holder this time) were caught distributing these works, and sued or prosecuted, you could certainly point to the release by Rouge and say that you had reasonable belief that you had implicit permission and were acting in good faith. Then the court could foreseeably uphold the copyright owners right to stop distribution while at the same time letting you off the hook.

      That doesn't mean that people in subsequent cases would be off the hook, though. It doesn't set the precedent you might think it does. A good deal would hinge on timelines after that. When did the alleged unlawful act take place, how much the alleged infringer knew and when, etc. It's not cut-and-dried.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    29. Re:Just a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is not correct at least in the US. In the US there is something known as apparent authority which would possibly apply here. If an employee sells you a car for less than a quarter of the normal price then that is actually a valid sale even if they exceeded their authority. The reason this is done is to prevent tactics like a car dealership selling you a car or a company (*cough*SCO*caugh*) contributing code to the Linux kernel under the GPL and then a few months or years later trying to take it back by claiming the employee exceeded their authority. The only problem is to use this defense you would have to show reasonable cause to believe that the person you downloaded the files from had the authority to do so. While that is a fairly low standard normally, given the nature of p2p it would be hard to argue that defense unless there was a news story that said those were legal downloads.

    30. Re:Just a thought by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that Rouge had an authorized copy given to him/her by the top tier organization with permission, explicit or implicit, to distribute it. I doubt this. So it's closer to a case of an employee stealing a car from his employer and selling it. Or better, a truck driver working for a trucking company offering to sell you a brand new, in the box, TV.

      I'm only saying that the copies were not released into the Public Domain, nor are they now authorized copies that anyone may freely distribute. I'm not condoning this, nor am I saying that anyone is going to escape the fallout from this discovery.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    31. Re:Just a thought by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      I was thinking it was more like driving a car into someone else's garage and the calling the police and saying they stole it.

    32. Re:Just a thought by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Actually, those things are very different. When a record company authorizes someone to manufacture CDs or places them into retail channels, they do so with the expectation of profit. They sell them into retail channels. They authorize radio stations to distribute them via the radio in exchange for fees.

      By contrast, putting a file on a P2P system is like putting something on a table and saying explicitly 'make as many copies as you like' and placing no restrictions on its use. Last I checked, that's the definition of 'public domain'. It isn't possible to place distribution restrictions on a file via P2P. In many designs, anyone who downloads is automatically an uploader. Even if that isn't mandated by the software design, it is implicit in the definition of the user base, and anyone placing files on P2P would have a hard time proving he/she didn't know this. If you do this as an authorized agent of the copyright holder....

      Now, techncially, you're right. Legally, you can't put something into the public domain without explicitly saying 'this is in the public domain'. However, you can license it in ways that make it effectively public domain, non-performance-derived derivative works (e.g. new versions of a song or a remake of a movie) notwithstanding (and only excluded because the studio probably doesn't own those rights).

      That said, I'm basing my comments on my interpretation of U.S. copyright law, and the details likely differ in Sweden. I don't know how much. Even in the U.S., this isn't clear-cut. I have no idea how a court would rule in such a case....

      The really interesting question, IMHO, is whether the movie company becomes liable to various content owners for publishing royalties on every copy distributed via P2P from now on....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  5. warez... by leonmergen · · Score: 1

    "so called warez" ?

    C'mon, this is slashdot, we know our piracy stuff... :)

    --
    - Leon Mergen
    http://www.solatis.com
  6. Rouge? by AAeyers · · Score: 3, Funny

    It seems as if the Anti-Piracy Buereau of Sweden and their infiltrator "Rouge" had a good deal of involvement in supporting the busted FTP server not only with hardware but with so called "warez" as well.

    "Rouge"?
    "warez"?

    CowboyNeal?!

    --
    "For Great Justice."
    1. Re:Rouge? by mottie · · Score: 3, Informative

      it also means red in french. not everyone uses english when they pick their alias. i've seen a lot worse

    2. Re:Rouge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe it was intentional? Languages other than English do exist, you know. Not to mention that rouge is also a valid word in English.

    3. Re:Rouge? by terraformer · · Score: 1

      Sadly, 64 posts in and still none of the moderators have gotten it. Sigh...
      Sorry, I can't help today.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    4. Re:Rouge? by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      Kinda like those people who get random Chinese characters tattooed on them.

      Hmmm, anyone happen to know the Chinese character for "fuckface?" I've just thought of a funny practical joke to play on a certain drunken friend.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    5. Re:Rouge? by LokieLizzy · · Score: 1

      You must be mistaken. English is clearly the universal language.

      --
      My digital rights don't need management.
    6. Re:Rouge? by triffidsting · · Score: 1

      With a friend like you...

      --
      Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
    7. Re:Rouge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      With a friend like you...

      who needs tatoos?

    8. Re:Rouge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      anyone happen to know the Chinese character for "fuckface?"

      No, but I can give you the Chinese for "oral sex" if that's close enough. It's a two-character word:

      U+53E3
      U+4EA4

    9. Re:Rouge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A new tv show premiered in the US called "Committed" [show sucks], but the premier episode had this huge macho black man showing off his tatu of Chinese characters tattooed on him. He had been told by the tatu artist it meant something like "Lion Who Roars!" or some other manly expression.

      When the chinese delivery boy came to deliver dinner, the black man [attempting to impress the white honkey protagonist] asked the boy to translate the tat. The boy was very reluctant to do so. Finally the boy said something like, "He who likes to lie as a woman with a man."

      Screaming in outrage, the black dude chased the kid out, and for the rest of the show, went from one Chinese person to the next asking them to translate the tat.

      "He who likes to lie as a woman with a man." believe it or not was the absolute nicest translation.

      Moral...never piss off the tatu artist!

      P/owned

    10. Re:Rouge? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      The best I could come up with using the Sherlock translation channel was for "sex face", as the word "fuck" wouldn't translate.

      I wonder if slashdot will even display it. I doubt it but here it is:

      ????

      OK, just previewed it, and it doesn't work. My browser can handle me pasting it, but slashcode fails it.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    11. Re:Rouge? by compm375 · · Score: 1

      No, I think you're thinking of Java. It runs on every platform.

    12. Re:Rouge? by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 1

      My Turing machine is more Universal than your Turing machine!

      Now was it move left and read, or move 2 left, then read....

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    13. Re:Rouge? by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 1

      Juarez?

      Bueller?

    14. Re:Rouge? by BigBadDude · · Score: 1


      this is slashdot, the land of truely geeks

      ok wait...

    15. Re:Rouge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kinda like those people who get random Chinese characters tattooed on them?

      I've seeen

      Cheap but good! Damn, no unicode support on slashdot.

    16. Re:Rouge? by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      Hrm, rouge... jolie rouge... jolly roger... He's a pirate!

    17. Re:Rouge? by Hinhule · · Score: 0

      Actually, the really funny part of this is that the infiltrator really is named Rouge.

    18. Re:Rouge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You looked at the preview, saw it doesn't work, and posted it anyway? What kind of moderation were you going for there?

    19. Re:Rouge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try "spotted turtle's egg", that's one of the better insults.

    20. Re:Rouge? by identity0 · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of one time when someone vandalized our high school - they tried to spraypaint the words "Rogue Ale" with the 'A' done anarchy logo style all over a courtyard, like dozens of places. Rogue Ale is an actual brand of beer, btw. Unfortunately, they misspelled it as "Rouge Ale" (perhaps because they had been enjoying said beverage before going on their spree), and made themselves look like complete idiots in the process.

      One teacher held up a dictionary and said, "If you know who did this, tell me who so I can get them a dictionary."

      No one fessed up to that one, AFAIK. : )

  7. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So, we're supposed to get angry at all anti-piracy groups now because this one planted evidence?

    I mean, that's really the point of posting this. If GPL authors can go after GPL violaters, copyright owners can go after infringers.

    1. Re:Sigh by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Interesting
      So, we're supposed to get angry at all anti-piracy groups now because this one planted evidence?

      I mean, that's really the point of posting this. If GPL authors can go after GPL violaters, copyright owners can go after infringers.
      So what you're implying is that it would be okay to secretly insert GPL code into a non-GPL project, then sue to have the project opened up. After all, that's the same as planting evidence.

      That's NOT what the GPL is for. Submarining shi[tt] is wrong, whichever side does it.

      Mind you, I can see the NEXT PROFIT MODEL:

      1. Stick your mp3 collection on company server
      2. If you're laid off, threaten to rat them out at $150,000 a song
      3. P-R-O-F-I-T (sung to the tune "I want Money!")
    2. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I'm pointing out the real motives behind the posting of this article--to get the P2P piracy defenders up in arms. "See, THEY'RE the evil ones!"

      I brought up the GPL violations because Slashdot also loves to post articles about those, and everyone starts talking about "stolen code" while professing that piracy isn't theft. Copyright infringement is copyright infringement. It's hypocrisy to complain about GPL violations but then try to paint anti-piracy groups as the bad guys.

    3. Re:Sigh by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      Mind you, I can see the NEXT PROFIT MODEL:

      1. Stick your mp3 collection on company server
      2. If you're laid off, threaten to rat them out at $150,000 a song
      3. P-R-O-F-I-T (sung to the tune "I want Money!")


      Best part is, you don't need underpants to do it!
    4. Re:Sigh by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      yes, because if you cant trust the govt then we wont obey ANY RULES or LAWS and say F.U.

      The govt and law enforcement can easily ruin any ones life, totally!!, but one case of infringement isnt going to ruin a company or cause life long problems for the company, it just moves on and keeps making sales.

      Id rather be a salesman/marketer any day than an enforcement agent.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    5. Re:Sigh by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "So, we're supposed to get angry at all anti-piracy groups now because this one planted evidence?"

      As opposed to not letting them know this behaviour won't be tolerated?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If GPL authors can go after GPL violaters, copyright owners can go after infringers.

      No matter how many times this is explained the ACs never seem to catch on. (is that a troll i smell?)

      Using without paying is COMPLETELY DIFFERENT than claiming authorship. Lumping them both under the umbrella term "piracy" is orwellian meme bundling.

      Need proof? Using without paying is legal in my country, but violating the GPL is not. See? Different.

    7. Re:Sigh by hkmwbz · · Score: 5, Insightful
      "I'm pointing out the real motives behind the posting of this article--to get the P2P piracy defenders up in arms. "See, THEY'RE the evil ones!""
      The real motives? They are the evil ones. This industry is actively lobbying for stricter laws that remove consumer rights, and move us towards fascism rather than democracy.

      These industry backed organizations pretend to be on a moral high ground, but the fact is that they engage in illegal and immoral activities.

      To me, entrapment, cartels, lobbying to remove individual rights, choking the market, terrorizing people with frivolous lawsuits, etc. are all far more serious than a bunch of kids swapping files.

      So yes, they are the evil ones, and the methods they are using to deal with kids swapping files are outrageous.

      "It's hypocrisy to complain about GPL violations but then try to paint anti-piracy groups as the bad guys."
      This is a load of crap, and you know it.
      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    8. Re:Sigh by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Informative
      This is no different than a vice squad planting heroin to make a bust, or detectives planting a bloody knife to frame a suspect. I don't know what the rules are like in Sweden, but I know here in Canada (and I'm pretty sure in the US as well), a judge would toss the case out.

      Looks like a 21st century version of Sergeant Norman Pilcher's campaign against rock star druggies.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    9. Re:Sigh by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      Best part is, you don't need underpants to do it!

      If you want to particularly emphasize the facts at hand, you can weave yourself underwear out of money. "Do you like my hat? It's made out of money! Do you want to stay for lunch? I think we're having MONEY!!!"

    10. Re:Sigh by X.25 · · Score: 1

      I mean, that's really the point of posting this. If GPL authors can go after GPL violaters, copyright owners can go after infringers.

      If true, this is kind of an 'entrapment'. Obviuosly, people trading warez are still 'pirates', but APB can't be called with nice names either. They were breaking the law.

      As a sidenote... If APB is not a government agency, I guess this 'infiltrator' could also be sued, since he can't get 'immunity' from non-official sources (corporations/companies). Well, he shouldn't be able to, but when I look at how corporations control the world...

    11. Re:Sigh by TorKlingberg · · Score: 5, Informative
      So, we're supposed to get angry at all anti-piracy groups now because this one planted evidence?

      These are some of the members companies of the Swedish Anti-Piracy Bureau. My guess is that most anti-piracy groups are run by them.

      Buena Vista Home Entertainment
      CAPITOL FILM DISTRIBUTION
      Columbia TriStar Films
      Microsoft
      PAN Vision
      Paramount Home Entertainment
      Sandrew Metronome
      Scanbox Entertainment
      Universal Pictures
      Vivendi Universal Games
      Warner Home Video
      Universal Music
      EMI Music
      Sony Music Entertainment

    12. Re:Sigh by Peaceful_Patriot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "I brought up the GPL violations because Slashdot also loves to post articles about those, and everyone starts talking about "stolen code" while professing that piracy isn't theft"

      I agree that piracy is theft..but I believe we disagree on what 'piracy' is. Selling thousands of bootleg copies of WinXP or Brittney is piracy. Someone sitting at home, listening to music for his/her own pleasure and use is NOT piracy, although the RIAA and MPAA have tried to make them seem like the same thing.

      --
      There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
    13. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If GPL authors can go after GPL violaters, copyright owners can go after infringers.

      Sure, but don't expect support from people who like the GPL but not the RIAA.

      It would take too long to explain to some people, but, basically you don't have to like the RIAA to like the GPL (or vice-versa). So you're not a "hypocrite" even if somebody who points that out gets some easy mod pointz.

    14. Re:Sigh by TheWizardOfCheese · · Score: 1

      So, we're supposed to get angry at all anti-piracy groups now because this one planted evidence?

      What's your point? By "we", I suppose you mean that segment of Slashdot users, possibly a minority, that are opposed to the legal enforcement of copyright. Well, those people are already angry at anti-piracy groups. One reason is that they believe that anti-piracy groups are big evil corporations, devoid of ethics, who screw everyone they can while wrapping themselves in a banner of rightous indignation. So now that they've found an actual, real-life example of heinous anti-piracy behaviour, they're supposed to say "Oh well, I guess we were wrong"? Why, exactly?

      If GPL authors can go after GPL violaters, copyright owners can go after infringers.

      Again, what's your point? If GPL authors can't illegally entrap GPL violators, copyright owners can do whatever the hell they want?

      --

      "The good reader is a rarer swan than the good writer."
    15. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's hypocrisy to complain about GPL violations but then try to paint anti-piracy groups as the bad guys.


      There's no contradiction here. A stated goal of the FSF, creators of the GPL, is the abolishment of copyrights. The GPL is just a stopgap measure (turning copyright law against itself), until it is one day repealed. Both views are consistant: they both stem from the belief that freedom of expression is important, and shouldn't be sold to corporate interests.


      The "Anti-piracy guys" are the bad guys in this case: they planted false evidence on someone else's computers. Framing someone is wrong, no matter what the underlying laws are.
      --
      AC

    16. Re:Sigh by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, Piracy is violence and murder atop the high seas. Selling thousands of bootleg copies of Windows XP or Britney Spears is both a violation of good taste and large scale copyright infringement.

      Nothing annoys me more than people referring to copyright infringement as 'piracy'. It does a dishonour to those I know who have actually had to fend off real pirates in their time (e.g. my best mate's dad, who's Chief Engineer on a very large Shell product carrier.)

    17. Re:Sigh by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      Piracy has meant copyright infringement (and illegal radio transmitter use) now for many decades, if not, in the former case, centuries. Complaining that it dishonours victims of "real" pirates (sea mobsters) to use it in this way is a little like complaining that using the word "rape" to describe the yellow crop farmed to create canola oil dishonours victims of the violent offense also associated with that word.

      Like it or not, piracy - in the English language - has more than one meaning.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    18. Re:Sigh by thaum1el · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, by Swedish law you might find yourself persecuted if you provoce a crime.

      But this is more like planting evidence, and I am pretty sure it is illegal in most western countries. It sure is here in Sweden.

      --
      War doesn't determine who is right, only who is left.
    19. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > everyone starts talking about "stolen code" while professing that piracy isn't theft.

      Everyone? I don't think so. Stop exaggerationing.

    20. Re:Sigh by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Guess what, english terms can have multiple valid meanings and definitions that do not detract from each other.

      Piracy as a term for copyright infringement is often taken to be a construct created by the modern music companies, when infact it dates way back to the 18th century, first appearing in print in 1771, and the Oxford English Dictionary has held this definition as its second definition of piracy pretty much since it was first in print.

    21. Re:Sigh by traabil · · Score: 1

      So, we're supposed to get angry at all anti-piracy groups now because this one planted evidence?

      This is /. We're not "supposed to get angry at anti-piracy groups". We already are angry. All of us.

    22. Re:Sigh by LarsWestergren · · Score: 1

      They are the evil ones. This industry is actively lobbying for stricter laws that remove consumer rights, and move us towards fascism rather than democracy.

      What? It's hyperbole day on Slashdot and no one informed me? This is the greatest injustice in the history of mankind!!

      --

      Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die

    23. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buena Vista Home Entertainment
      CAPITOL FILM DISTRIBUTION
      Columbia TriStar Films
      Microsoft
      PAN Vision
      Paramount Home Entertainment
      Sandrew Metronome
      Scanbox Entertainment
      Universal Pictures
      Vivendi Universal Games
      Warner Home Video
      Universal Music
      EMI Music
      Sony Music Entertainment


      Ha ha ha, we got your names now and we're gonna pirate you SO hard! Arr!

    24. Re:Sigh by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
      This is not the first time it has happened. Maybe the first time in that country but us SlashDoters know all too well the many people that the MPAA has accused and were clearly wrong about. An 80 year old dead woman comes to mind recently. The granny pirate didn't stick, the MPAA had egg all over their face again.

      Some of us may remember a flap of the MPAA in 1998 where the MPAA was going after girl scout troops that were singing the Macarena, a popular song at the time with a dance that went along with it. They didn't want the Girl Scouts to use any copyrighted music on their boom boxes... Nope, nosirreee, stop that dancing and listening to music that is not on the radio girls!

      The artists stepped in to stop the madness. Here, read it for yourself - http://csmonitor.com/cgi-bin/durableRedirect.pl?/d urable/1998/06/11/fp51s1-csm.htm (Thanks uncle google).

      If someone is violating the law that is one thing. Planting evidence is something entirely different. Anyone doing that should face a stiff penalty for that. Perhaps they should be convicted of the original crime and have to serve the punishment.

    25. Re:Sigh by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Nice troll, but the FSF's goal has never been to abolish copyright, but to promote freedom of use for computer code: http://www.mirror5.com/home.html
      FSF's mission to preserve, protect and promote the freedom to use, study, copy, modify, and redistribute computer software, and to defend the rights of Free Software users
    26. Re:Sigh by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 1

      English is a living language. As speakers of English, it falls to us to accept as either valid or invalid new meanings for existing words.

      I choose to reject 'piracy' as even back in 1771 (or whenever 'twas) it was an attempt to add an emotional charge to a far lesser transgression.

      Your mileage may vary, and I don't expect a free iPod spammer to understand the subtleties.

    27. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      god damm.. you gpl people are really getting annoying

    28. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO! It cheapens my treasured word! I refuse to call a Ford Ranger a truck! It offends my trucker friend who drives a semi! Poor him!

    29. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should at least link to the web comic you are plagerizing from.

  8. "warez" by pablonhd · · Score: 5, Funny

    So called "warez" ? "warez" did all this software come from? From Anti-Piracy Buereau of Sweden of course! What you pun?

  9. Found _something_ by eddy · · Score: 5, Informative

    >So that's why they were so sure to find stuff, they put it there!

    Well, the fun part is that they actually did not find the stuff they were looking for (specified to the court), and IIRC, they didn't even find the servers they were looking for.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
    1. Re:Found _something_ by jonfelder · · Score: 5, Funny

      In other news they didn't find the droids they were looking for either.

    2. Re:Found _something_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here are the logs of Rouge trading warez while working for APB:

      Wed Sep 1 19:11:02 2004 16 disabled 50000000 /site/console/uploads/ps2/Dynasty_Warriors_4_Empir es-USA-PS2DVD-DAGGER/dgr-dw4e.021 b _ o r rouge IND 1 disabled

      etc, etc.

    3. Re:Found _something_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they didn't even find the servers they were looking for.

      then obviously the jedi mind trick *does* work on swedes

    4. Re:Found _something_ by Ailure · · Score: 1

      Most of the stuff they found was American stuff that the American anti-piracy orginsations probably would look for ironically. I'm so glad there is no international anti-piracy orginsations that works... yet.

    5. Re:Found _something_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except you have to wave your hand twice. The cold makes 'em a little thick up there.

    6. Re:Found _something_ by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      In other news they didn't find the droids they were looking for either.

      You have to wave your arm when you say that.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    7. Re:Found _something_ by torpor · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I find your lack of faith disturbing.

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    8. Re:Found _something_ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *petrified and covered in hot grits*

  10. Not only planting evidence... by spaeschke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It also sounds like entrapment. "Hey, can we be in your scene?!? Here's some 133t zero day games!" sounds a lot like "Hey honey, you working? $50 if you show me a good time."

    1. Re:Not only planting evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your example btw is NOT entrapment in the USA. :)

    2. Re:Not only planting evidence... by monkeyserver.com · · Score: 1

      not only entrapment, but it soundslike he could be charged with all those crimes that they would have charged the ISP with. He was sharing out warez wasn't he?

      --
      http://monkeyserver.com --- weeeeee
    3. Re:Not only planting evidence... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Yes but is the entrapment defense valid in Sweden?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Not only planting evidence... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the point is that it's illegal to do such things in sweden.

      in usa the feds have couple of times(?) supplied fast connections and servers to get into the scene to bust people.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Not only planting evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the US, "Entrapment" means enticing someone to do something they wouldn't normally have done. Paying for a server and letting people use it for warez would probably not be entrapment... if you didn't provide the football field, the teams would have played somewhere else. Likewise, if the woman was "working" offering her $50 wouldn't be entrapment either, she'd have taken anyone else's $50 just the same.

      Of course, being the highest volume games trader for a year is a slightly different matter, but I think its likely that once the companies whose games were up there get involved, this "Rouge" fellow is going to wish entrapment was the worst of their worries. They're going to want an explanation, and blood.

    6. Re:Not only planting evidence... by cheekyboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That sure is entrapment, sure you can say "she could have sold her services elsewhere" but its still an IF, and you cannot predict the future. You cannot say with 100% sure chance that person would have sold to someone else. This aint precrime tomcruise world.

      And if the cops are so sure person X would have done it, then they could have easily just waited till they did, or are they that lazy and fat?

      OT, if she only reads you poems thats not illegal, so why should something else that cant be taxed not be legal. Is it because its selling something that makes a neat profit and cant be taxed that is annoying the govt/police? or their church going ways of the 18th century?

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    7. Re:Not only planting evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the first thing I thought when I read the title/summary. Whatever happened to entrapment being a bad thing? It's the public attitude about treatment of suspects that matters here.

      Isn't it like proving someone is a criminal by being able to pursuade them to do criminal things and/or even helping them commit a crime?

      I understand there's a fine line between engaging in entrapment and merely being an informant...but com'mon! We've gone from innocent until proven guilty to presumed guilty until proven innocent all the way to helping commit the crime they're trying to prevent.

    8. Re:Not only planting evidence... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not only entrapment, but it soundslike he could be charged with all those crimes that they would have charged the ISP with. He was sharing out warez wasn't he?

      Just because the justice system is providing the heavies doesn't make it a criminal act. In my country (it may be different there) copyright violations fall under CIVIL law. It is unlikely that EMI et al want to sue their snitch.

      The $64K question is "do they have to sue?" IANAL but it seems that if the snitch did not have the permission of the dons and they choose not to lean on him, the next mug they try to roll might have a good defence. If documents are found indicating that they authorized the release of those files to the street then it could be a very good defense. For this reason, they will probably be sending their consiglieries over to give the weasels a cuff upside the head and "reach a settlement" for form's sake.

  11. A New Excuse. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "As it turns out, APB (or, rather, their hired informer) supplied the servers and uploaded copyrighted materials. So that's why they were so sure to find stuff, they put it there!""

    In other words, the pro-piracy groups has just found a new excuse. "I wasn't pirating. I WAS FRAMED!"

    1. Re:A New Excuse. by hkmwbz · · Score: 2, Interesting
      No. In other words, the entertainment industry's representatives are pretending to be on a moral high ground, always having their rights violated, and the evil file sharers are giving them a hard time.

      The fact is that these people are not on a moral high ground. They do data mining, illegal monitoring of online activity, entrapment, illegal entry, and so on, and still they keep complaining about a bunch of kids swapping files.

      Trying to lobby for fascism and using illegal methods to terrorize individuals and trying to scare people into submission is far more serious than file swapping in my book.

      The way to deal with file swapping is not to lobby for laws that take away rights from the consumers. The way to deal with it is to adapt to the market, not set up cartels and do massive lobbying to choke the market until it behaves the way the megacorporations want it to.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  12. It's ROGUE by slashrogue · · Score: 1

    Damn people can't spell. Or he is purposely going by "rouge" but why would a guy do that? Maybe after so many years of going by the typo of "rogue" he just couldn't give it up... ha.

    1. Re:It's ROGUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rouge means red in French

    2. Re:It's ROGUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't heard the reasononing behind it, but it is not a typo.

    3. Re:It's ROGUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Or he is purposely going by "rouge" but why would a guy do that?

      Maybe he'd like to be on women's cheeks?

      I can't keep them straight, but I am smart enough to look it up. Still, you got me interested if there was any logic to those stupid words. Nope.

      rogue: Origin unknown.

      What a stupid language. You can feel proud that you can memorize pointless facts so easily, but I've found English spelling to be the hardest thing I've ever tried to learn.

    4. Re:It's ROGUE by recursiv · · Score: 1

      yes, a very effeminate red. read the parent again.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    5. Re:It's ROGUE by KillerDeathRobot · · Score: 1

      The fact that a dictionary doesn't tell you the origin of the word "rogue" doesn't mean there isn't a perfectly valid reason for it to be spelled like that.

      For one thing, it probably has to do with e's in English making g's soft. Thus a more standard spelling of "roge" would evoke the wrong sound.

      --
      Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
    6. Re:It's ROGUE by triffidsting · · Score: 1

      You are joking, right? I mean, you know "rouge" is French for "red," yes?

      --
      Non, je ne veux pas coucher avec toi ce soir.
    7. Re:It's ROGUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's quite possible he meant it to be Rogue, but Rouge means Red in French. Also, a popular Swedish book by Jan Guillou goes by the name of "Coq Rouge".

      It might also be a pun aimed towards the overly anal crowd that still argues whether its ninja or pirate.
      http://archive.gamespy.com/comics/nodwick /gamespya rchive/gspynod151.html

    8. Re:It's ROGUE by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a "she". Rouge; the vampish investigator.

      An attractive woman could pretty much load whatever she wanted to those servers and no male geek was gonna say anything contrary. If it'd been a guy, well, everybody'd be comparing the lengths of the encryption keys on their "warez".

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    9. Re:It's ROGUE by Mettra · · Score: 1

      In French, rouge is red.

    10. Re:It's ROGUE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's very much a 'he', his name and address was posted when APB's site was hacked about a week ago.

      Considering his spelling in the information Banhof posted it's probably a misspelled 'rogue'.

    11. Re:It's ROGUE by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I agree. Anyone who mistakes "rouge" and "rogue" is a real looser.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  13. Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This might all be a misstatement. If you follow the link and download the logs, you see he had access for 2yrs and was uploading and downloading a lot of stuff. Now the question we should be asking is... how LONG was he an informant?

    Meaning, maybe he was a kid busted for warez, and the police offered him a deal (no jail time in return for access to the server). So the end result may be that he was working for the police, but he wasn't in fact the police.

    If that's the case, then I don't think the argument of planting evidence is going to work.

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Meaning, maybe he was a kid busted for warez, and the police offered him a deal (no jail time in return for access to the server). So the end result may be that he was working for the police, but he wasn't in fact the police.

      1) Police don't make deals. Procecutors do.

      2) Swedish procecutor's do not. It's an american practice.

      3) The guy wasn't working for law enforcement. He recived payment from the 'anti piracy bureau' which is not a law-enforcement or government agency, but rather the Swedish equivalent of the MPAA/RIAA.

      If that's the case, then I don't think the argument of planting evidence is going to work.

      Entrapment isn't legal even if the police do it. It certainly isn't legal when a private citizen does it.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those kind of "deals" are illegal in Sweden. It is seen as an invitation to commit crime, which is completely illegal in every aspect.

    3. Re:Hmm... by KarmaMB84 · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that if a private citizen buries a suitcase full of crack cocaine in my back yard and goes and tells the cops, I should be tried and convicted for it even if I show that I never put the case there and that someone else did?

    4. Re:Hmm... by DavidTC · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Entrapment for the police means they have no case. They can't arrest people for stuff the police encouraged them to do.

      'Entrapment' for private citizens is just simply 'breaking the law'. It's no more entrapment than driving a getaway car is entrapment...it's just a crime, period. Doesn't matter if you were going to turn them in or not.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Meaning, maybe he was a kid busted for warez, and the police offered him a deal (no jail time in return for access to the server). So the end result may be that he was working for the police, but he wasn't in fact the police."

      I can only speak for my own country - Belgium - but here the police is not allowed, certainly no private organisation, to entrap someone. I can only guess that this is te same for other European countries.

    6. Re:Hmm... by aaronl · · Score: 1

      For 1 - the police could conceivably make a deal, it would just carry little legal weight. They could agree that they would not arrest and force charges if he cooperated.

      Entrapment is generally only something that an agent of the state (ie: police) can do. I can encourage you to steal, but if you do it, it's your fault. If anything, I would be an accomplice even if I was the person to report you. If the police impersonated a store employee and said to go ahead and grab something and run out, that they weren't looking and they hate the place - then they encouraged you to break a law, and hence, entrapped you. Generally, it is when they urge someone to commit a crime they wouldn't have necessarily done without the intervention.

    7. Re:Hmm... by pixas · · Score: 1

      According to the email logs recoverd and posted by AUH at APB's hacked website, that's precisely how long ABP had (have) been working with infiltrators.

      From: peter@anti-piracy.se
      Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 9:29
      To: Tilbury, Chad; Seymour, Dan; Winter, Craig
      Subject: Swedish pirates busted!

      Hi guys!

      After 2 years of infiltrations our work finally paid of today with a
      successful raid on Sweden's oldest and largest ISP named Bahnhof.
      Bahnhof has been a source for top level piracy for several years and
      hosting some of the biggest and fastest servers in Europe.

    8. Re:Hmm... by thaum1el · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Swedish law does not permit you to make such deals.

      --
      War doesn't determine who is right, only who is left.
    9. Re:Hmm... by mbaciarello · · Score: 1
      1) Police don't make deals. Procecutors do.

      They can very well. They're called "informants," "snitches" or "a guy I know." It may not carry a legal weight, but there are (usually petty) criminals cops let be just because they give them the skinny on what's going on on the scene. A prosecutor would not be bound to protect/ignore such persons, but the actual enforcers will close an eye on them.

      2) Swedish procecutor's do not. It's an american practice.

      This doesn't mean 'underground' deals don't happen. Most are, especially in smaller crimes.

      3) The guy wasn't working for law enforcement.

      It makes it all the easier to make a deal: You snitch, I won't sue you (or give your name to the appropriate law enforcement agency.) That doesn't make him or her any less of a snitch. After all, it's a private organization which has been given power analogous to that of public prosecutors: I mean, they have the right to search and seize private property - how does this make them very different from official police?

    10. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Australian P2P bust also went horribly wrong. Now the RIAA or whatever, are now singing the tune that illegally obtained evidence will be used irrespective that it was not on the original search warrant. Does the law of evidence over there, terminate 'fishing expeditions' with predjustice?

  14. Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I used to work with a guy who had the worst command of English ever. What made this more perplexing was that it was his native tongue. Anyway, we developed a lexicon of terms that he couldn't pronounce.

    Alias? "Uh lie us".
    Executable? "Egg ZEK you table"
    Egregious? "Eee gruh gare eee us" (like e-gregarious")

    Anyway, his most..er.. egregious offense was when he came across the term "0day warez." We were at lunch talking about software or something else nerdy and he mentioned "Oday Juarez" (oh-day war ezz). I thought he was talking about an Iraqi-Mexican immigrant that had just started at work or something.

    No. He read 0day warez as "Oday Juarez."

    If I ever sign up for a Slashdot account, Oday Juarez is going to be my nick.

    1. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Janek+Kozicki · · Score: 1

      If I ever sign up for a Slashdot account, Oday Juarez is going to be my nick.

      time to sign up now, tommorow you'll get higher ID. imagine - in "few" months people will start to respect your low ID!

      --
      #
      #\ @ ? Colonize Mars
      #
    2. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. I knew a guy who called it "war-ezz." He knows better now.

    3. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by fwice · · Score: 1

      If I ever sign up for a Slashdot account, Oday Juarez is going to be my nick.

      no, it's not.

      The nickname 'Oday Juarez', or another similar to it, is already in use. Please choose another.

    4. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by theVP · · Score: 1

      You fuck, that was me!!!

      ...

      Okay, so it wasn't....but it STILL hurts my feelings that you said that!!!

      --
      "No one is more miserable than the person who wills everything and can do nothing." -Emperor Claudius 10 BC - AD 54
    5. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hm, I've never pronounced warez as anything other than one syllable, but I've always pronounced 0day as oh-day. It's not like anyone cares, and zero takes more syllables to pronounce.

    6. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Hyperspac · · Score: 1

      No. He read 0day warez as "Oday Juarez."

      If I ever sign up for a Slashdot account, Oday Juarez is going to be my nick.


      I have a feeling the New York times may find it a common name in the near furture as well...

    7. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd scoff at you, but I don't want one of the 593550 people with a lower number than mine scoffing at me.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    8. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by boarder · · Score: 1

      Like me.

      Scoff.

      --
      IANAL, but I play one on /.
    9. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by claussenvenable · · Score: 1

      IANASPBMMI,
      I Am Not A Speech Pathologist But My Mom Is, and
      for what it's worth, he may simply have been dyslexic and derived the pronunciations from the written forms of the words.

      In most of those examples, take note of the way he pulled things apart into component syllables, and essentially just crammed the pronunciation for each syllable together, as each was familiar to him.

      One common characteristic of dyslexia is an inability to recognize "whole words" as such -- where you or I see the word "perfunctory", my dyslexic friends see a string of letters with no inherent meaning. Sounding it out is the only way for some people to cope. With hilarious pronunciational (is that a word?) results, admittedly.

    10. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by dillon_rinker · · Score: 1

      Pfft. I was scoffing at people back when EnsgnTaco was running the place.

    11. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Zemran · · Score: 1

      Why would we scoff at you for arriving late as long as you bring the beer and pizza...

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    12. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by SuperQ · · Score: 2, Funny

      EnsignTaco? Back in my day, we just called him TacoBoy ;)

    13. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's as bad as the lady I work with who can't understand why anyone would want to own a "cheh who-ah who-ah" dog. I'll leave that up to the reader's imaginations (though I wouldn't want to own one either).

    14. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No. He read 0day warez as "Oday Juarez."

      Was his name Les Nessman?

    15. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      I like to call it Juarez just because it adds another layer of obfuscation for the law enforcement types to unravel.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    16. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wtf is 0day?

    17. Re:Off Topic : How to pronoune "warez" by himself · · Score: 2, Funny

      >
      > No. He read 0day warez as "Oday Juarez."
      >
      I am helpess in the grip of the obligatory WKRP In Cincinnati quote:

      Johnny: Les, correct me if I'm wrong, but have you developed a recent fondness for alliteration?

      Les: Well, I'm trying to find a style, Johnny. All good newsmen nowadays have to have a style in order to stand out from the crowd.

      Johnny: But Les, you've always had a real style of your own. How many newsmen called Chi Chi Rodrigues "Chiy-Chiy Rodwagwayz"? And what is it you call those little Mexican dogs?

      Les: "Cheehooahooas"?

      Johnny: That's style, Les!

  15. Rouge? by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Funny

    Really? The informer went by the name rouge ? That's pretty funny, and points out the hazards of trying to use a language in which you aren't native just because it sounds/looks cool. Kinda like those people who get random Chinese characters tattooed on them.

  16. Right idea by gitana · · Score: 1

    This seems to be a slightly different take on what we have been seeing in the US with the MPAA et al releasing fake materials onto p2p networks to frustrate pirates.

    Here, they seem to be going after the providers of warez rather than the downloaders. This is the right idea - except for the sticky bit of planting the materials.

    It seems to me that it would be worth the effort for copyright enforcers to work their way to the source of illegal goods without dirtying their own hands.

    1. Re:Right idea by Spearhawk · · Score: 1

      They don't go after the downloaders because they can't, since it's not ilegal yet. It will be come summer, so I guess they'll start by then.

  17. Testing for Fake Pirates by AtariAmarok · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    There are some good tests for fake pirates. Go ahead, ask if you can pound a foot-long spike through that "peg leg". And if there is really no eye behind that eyepatch, he won't mind a bit if you jab a pencil in the hole. Arrrr!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Testing for Fake Pirates by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I just listen to what the parrot says.

      A pirate parrot's mouth should be as filthy as his infected piercings.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  18. people want to jump to the wrong conclusion by Auckerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So some guy sets up a warez server in a computer lab. At least one of his friends that he has known for four years gets involved. For some reason, guy decides to busy his own warez server. Suspicious, yes. Worth investigating, certainly. Entrapment, probably not, unless it can be shown that he set up and maintained the server under the auspices of the legal authorities.

    --

    Burn Hollywood Burn
    1. Re:people want to jump to the wrong conclusion by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      There's a legal principle called "fruit of the poisoned tree" that I think covers this. If any evidence is illegally obtained, even if that evidence is not used, any evidence derived from it is tainted and not permissible in court.

      There is some leeway with this. I did some PI work way back when (yeah, I was an operative), and did some work on a case involving a ski lift accident. I went to the ski lift with my video camera, and began videotaping "the scenery" without identifying myself as an investigator. The guy working the lift gave me permission and we chatted while the video camera ran. I began asking him questions about the safety of the lift equipment, accidents, etc.

      Anyway, to make an already long story short, the attorney didn't want to use the video tape (with it's very interesting audio track) as evidence because, although I had permission to tape (and had that on tape) I didn't have explicit permission from the guy to tape the conversation. OTOH, the guy knew my camera was running, or should have known it was capturing our conversation.

      The attorney was still pretty thrilled with what I got because it helped him press some good questions during deposition time. I'm not sure if they took the lift operator's deposition, but I'd say they probably did.

      (Total aside: I got out of that line of work after about a year, because most of what I did for this detective was process serving, which isn't the most pleasant work. A coworker broke both a leg and an arm getting thrown down some stairs. Good money, though.)

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    2. Re:people want to jump to the wrong conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least in the US that would be acceptable as you had implied permission to tape the conversation. The operator knew you were taping and knew that camcorders record both audio and video therefore he wouldn't have any reason to complain. That is one reason why if you want to tape a meeting all you have to do is put the tape recorder on the table in plain view of everyone present and push the record button.

  19. wheres the outrage? by Rs_Conqueror · · Score: 0, Troll

    To be honest, I don't see why anyone is so worked up over this. Law enforcement has been "hiring" hitmen in order to find and arrest them for decades. (and no, I do not support antiP2P groups in any way at all).

    1. Re:wheres the outrage? by _GNU_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is illegal in Sweden, FYI.

    2. Re:wheres the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      APB isn't law-enforcement, they're an umbrella organization made up of media companies like Sony and the rest of the usual suspects. HELLO, ANYONE HOME?

      The issue is what are these people allowed to do in order to go onto a premises in search of warez. "Sorry, didn't find the stuff we put here ourselves, but let's tip the police off about some other unrelated stuff...

    3. Re:wheres the outrage? by Rs_Conqueror · · Score: 1

      aah ok, forgive my misinformation in that case.

    4. Re:wheres the outrage? by js3 · · Score: 1

      So the next time I get busted for warez I'll claim to be a secret government hitman who can't reveal his sources

      --
      did you forget to take your meds?
    5. Re:wheres the outrage? by gr8_phk · · Score: 4, Insightful
      "Law enforcement has been "hiring" hitmen in order to find and arrest them for decades."

      Law enforcement hires a hitman and then arrests him before he does the job - like right after he accepts some money. They do not commit murders themselves to become part of a group that does such (that we know of). They can pretend to be drug buyers in order to catch dealers, but it's not OK to become a low level dealer (selling to the public anyway) in order to move up the food chain to reach the source - or does this happen?

    6. Re:wheres the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Maybe a clarification is in place:
      Legal:
      bevisprovokation="evidence provocation", which means to eg. purchase narcotics if someone is already actively selling it
      Illegal:
      brottsprovokation="crime provocation", i.e. police actions that lead someone to commit a crime, which wouldn't otherwise have been committed - e.g. asking someone "can you supply me with...?", obviously it's likely that an individual that is capable of dealing does it anyway but wouldn't commit that specific crime unless he/she was asked to do so

    7. Re:wheres the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Despite it's name, the Anti-Piracy Bureau is not a government agency, it has nothing to do with law enforcement.
      They represent the recording, software, and movie industries, they are the swedish MPAA/RIAA/BSA combined into one group.
      Basically they sue and harass people.

    8. Re:wheres the outrage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      In Puerto Rico, where you have many different agencies (local cops, FBI, DEA, HIDTA taskforces, etc) all working in the same areas, it's surprising how often you have one group of undercover good guys arresting another group of undercover good guys.

      It's so common they even have a name for the category of software "deconfliction system" that trys to avoid this problem: http://www.mfiles.org/hidta/Newsletters/vol2issue2 /22body4.html http://www.dea.gov/pubs/ndpix/ndpix40103a.htm

    9. Re:wheres the outrage? by DavidTC · · Score: 1
      Uh, no. The police cannot, and do not, hit hitmen to kill people. That's entrapment.

      And how you phrased it seems to imply that police hire them and then find them, which is idiotic. The police wouldn't ask someone to kill someone else and then let them leave...if they killed that person the police would have commited murder. I'm not saying the police haven't ever hired someone, but they can't arrest you for agreeing to a crime they suggested. (OTOH, if they were seen near a professional hit, the police might do that to get evidence you were a hitman, and thus get a search warrant to connect you to the other crime. I dunno if that would work, though.)

      What they do, however, is the opposite. They learn someone wants to kill someone, so they show up as a hitman, and get hired to kill someone, at which point they arrest the person. You'd be amazed how many people ask hookers to find hitman for them, and how many hookers are happy to hook that person up with the police...they don't like murderers either, and having the police owe them one is nice.

      You can't go around asking people to commit crimes and arrest them when they agree, that's always been entrapment and doesn't work pretty much everywhere, legally.

      But like I said, the police can make it known they are a certain kind of criminal, and wait for someone to approach them with a job. As long as they say 'I'm a getaway driver, are you looking for one?' and not 'I can drive the getaway car next week from the bank if you guys are in.', it's not entrapment.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    10. Re:wheres the outrage? by Zemran · · Score: 1

      It would still be agent provocatuer to hire a hit man. He would simply say that he only became a hit man because you talked him into becoming one. Therefore it is you (the prosecution) that created the crime and are therefore the criminal. It may happen in the US but it is illegal in Europe.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    11. Re:wheres the outrage? by gr8_phk · · Score: 1
      " It would still be agent provocatuer to hire a hit man.

      You're right, they wait for some non-cop to do the hiring and then arrest them both. They also wait for the hookers to solicit the cops, not the other way around. I think.... Anyway, the scenario in the original story wouldn't fly here.

  20. The news from piratbyran.org... by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Informative

    They're saying that the hired infiltrator had retrieved and shared the most part of all games and movies released during 2004. To gain more space for all copies, the infiltrator had even bought and sent hardware for a total of SEK 20,000 ($2,800). In the beginning of March, he was supposed to send hard drives totalling at 800 GB, however the raid came in between.

    Even worse, this raid was part supported by STIM, an organization partially funded by the swedish government.

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    1. Re:The news from piratbyran.org... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I must say I'm not too surprised by this. Some parts of the warez scene is stuffed with money and where does it come from?
      I lived in an apartment with a 100mbit internet connection recently, and was approached several times by strangers on the net wanting to send me expencive hardware if I put up a server of some kind.
      You gotta have some spare cash if you trust comlete strangers in a different country with expencive hardware.

      My guess is that some of that money comes from organizations like these. It could come from theft or other illegal activities, but why would you give away your hard earned cash? Not much profit in sending me hardware *and* supplying the warez to fill it.

    2. Re:The news from piratbyran.org... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do it because you love the scene and because as a hardware supplier you can get good deals on the site such as leech or not having to worry about quota.

      It's a hobby like any else, many people don't mind spending some money on it.

  21. In the US, the ISP could sue for damages by mveloso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In the US, the ISP could sue for damages, and there's a good chance the APB would settle for a large sum.

    Can they do that in Sweden? Or are they just going to get a "so sorry, we'll be sure it doesn't happen again (until next time)?"

    1. Re:In the US, the ISP could sue for damages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I doubt it. Sweden is not a litigous society. And even if they do win, the damages wouldn't be substantial.

      All in all, I like it that way actually. Even though in this case it woudl be nice. :-)

    2. Re:In the US, the ISP could sue for damages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they where preperd to get sued, they left 1000 000sek about 140 000us with the court before the razzia in case they would sue for damage.

  22. What do Swedish Pirates themselves have to say? by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    I veell seenk yuoor sheep und ploonder yuoor buuty und peellege-a yuoor vumee. Avast, yuoor feelleges und buets veell feer. Hurty flurty schnipp schnipp! Arrrghh. I vurk vurk vurk und em keelhaul zee scuoorge-a ooff zee ooceuns. Um gesh dee vork vork vork!

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:What do Swedish Pirates themselves have to say? by Soulfarmer · · Score: 3, Funny

      That sounded A LOT more like dutch than swedish... :)

      --
      -Is the meaning of life vanity, or is vanity the meaning of life?
    2. Re:What do Swedish Pirates themselves have to say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. It should be quite easy to tell the difference between (jokingly faked or real) Dutch and Swedish/Danish/Norwegian since the last three very rarely have two identical vowels in a row whilst that is quite common in Dutch.

    3. Re:What do Swedish Pirates themselves have to say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bork, bork, bork

    4. Re:What do Swedish Pirates themselves have to say? by sessamoid · · Score: 1

      Well, he did use the Encheferizer.

      --
      "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    5. Re:What do Swedish Pirates themselves have to say? by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I didn't know they even had pirates in Sweden. I thought they had vikings.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    6. Re:What do Swedish Pirates themselves have to say? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats new for slashdot moderators:
      Among german and russian language also swedish is now being bashed. Wonderfull americans, what a pitty we can not all be like you.

    7. Re:What do Swedish Pirates themselves have to say? by fgb · · Score: 1

      that should be bork bork bork!

    8. Re:What do Swedish Pirates themselves have to say? by swiftstream · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's more like I will build an uberlarge ship to blow you to smithereens, but it will be too top-heavy and sink.

      Then I will raise it up, put it in a museum, and call it the pride of the Swedish fleet.

      It's true!

      --
      Be a PATRIOT--because the only thing we have to fear is the lack thereof.
  23. Those warez of by Benm78 · · Score: 1

    Those warez of mass destruction have got to be somewhere!

    1. Re:Those warez of by BoomerSooner · · Score: 2, Funny

      I always wondered if there were republicans/conservatives in Sweden. Guess I know for certain now.

    2. Re:Those warez of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That the answer is no? Repubs/conservatives would have searched based on faulty evidence and not found anything. It takes the genius of a dem/neoliberal to plant the evidence and insure vindication.

  24. Fine. by ta+bu+shi+da+yu · · Score: 1

    If that's the case, charge the fucker.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  25. One way this can be proven by phaetonic · · Score: 1

    If the server was running *nix, and had remote syslog configure to pipe all FTP logs to another server in another country. The IP address and files uploaded would be recorded. At that point, they will have to deal with hunting down the internet connection and who used it, which is easier said than done. Just a thought.

    1. Re:One way this can be proven by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      or setup 20 gmail accounts called "ftplog_001" etc..

      and email the bziped logs to the email account.

      or use a large long hex string to confuse the 'normal' people in plush govt offices ;)

      Out of 50 characters, someones bound to get 1 character wrong.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    2. Re:One way this can be proven by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pretty stupid to keep the logs on a server you're using for illegal purposes. You're much more likely to incriminate yourself than for them to be of help to you.

  26. For real. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    I remember when a friend came up to me and said. "Have you seen all those Juarez web sites?". I had no idea what he was talking about, except maybe that he was fascinated by going to a part of Mexico not known for tourism. Eventually I found out he meant warez, and sincerely was reading it wrong.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  27. FTP logs by MrZilla · · Score: 1

    The company (Bahnhof) also posted the FTP logs on their site... Quite a lot of uploading going on there.

    --
    mov ax, 4c00h
    int 21h
  28. Re: "Oh Snap?" by Superfreaker · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Oh Snap!"

    That phrase really dates you. I think you were looking for something more like:
    "Homey don't play dat!"

  29. Oh dear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    No, that phrase is [i]never[/i] appropriate.

    Lame =).

    I don't know what's more lame, the phrase you were referring to, our your attempted use of BBCode on Slashdot.

    1. Re:Oh dear by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      It's a shame, since phpBB is a superior implementation from an ease of use standpoint. slashcode style bbs are more for geek elitists who bother to memorize html than they are for your average human.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    2. Re:Oh dear by shadowmas · · Score: 1

      slashcode style bbs are more for geek elitists who bother to memorize html than they are for your average human.

      errr.. i always though that geek elistists were the intended audiance of slashdot ;)

    3. Re:Oh dear by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > geek elitists who bother to memorize html than they are for your average human.

      Wow, what logic.... So you are saying [tag] & [/tag] are sane and simple, whereas <tag> & </tag> are for elitist bastards... Greeaaaat.

    4. Re:Oh dear by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      No, Im saying that most phpBB's dont make you memorize it, because they have toggle buttons for the tags, you elitist bastard.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
  30. This is NOT Planting Evidence by CustomFort · · Score: 0

    If they were busting the sites for the warez which they uploaded, then that would be planting evidence. If they were busting them for the other warez, then that would NOT be evidence planting. Get your terminology correct.

    I don't know about Swedish law, but under American law providing servers and warez would probably be considered entrapment. (Entrapment is not as simple as many people think.)

    Here is an example:
    If a police officer sells someone 1 kg of marijuana, and then turn around and arrest them, and they have 2kgs of marijuana, then that is not planting evidence. It might be entrapment, but it depends.

    If on the other hand, a police officer plants 1 kg of marijuana, and then busts them for having 2 kgs of marijuana, it is evidence planting. (Likely the arrest would be thrown out, because the police likely couldn't prove they didn't plant all of the marijuana)

    If a police officer sells someone marijuana, and then busts them for posession, then it is probably entrapment (but there are exceptions).

    If a police officer sells someone marijuana after being propositioned, then it is NOT entrapment.

    IANAL, so YMMV.

    1. Re:This is NOT Planting Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Under swedish law, cops can't commit crimes period.

    2. Re:This is NOT Planting Evidence by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

      Isnt the common case that the police find 2kg of gods wonderfull plant, but then record in the official records that they only found 1kg, and take the rest of the stash to their cop friends to sell on the side to lower ranked cops ;)

      btw someone splice the THC gene into roses or something or bamboo, then no one would know.

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    3. Re:This is NOT Planting Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or bamboo

      Vision: One way bamboo pipes.

    4. Re:This is NOT Planting Evidence by CustomFort · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see where it says that. I find that highly unlikely, at least as you said it.

    5. Re:This is NOT Planting Evidence by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

      That's funny -- under American law, cops can't commit crimes either.

      Yet, tell me what the Rodney King beating was if not criminal. Or the Kent State shootings by the National Guard (not police, but reserve military). Or the infinite examples of cops flipping on their lights to blow through red-light intersections, then flip the lights off immediately afterwards (abuse of police power).

      Not to mention the cases of torture that have occurred involving anal rape via nightsticks, torture with Taser stun guns, and so forth.

      Yeah dude, cops NEVER commit crimes... Bullshit.

    6. Re:This is NOT Planting Evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      omg you just blew my mind

  31. RE: Snap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no evidence a Snap Server was involved...
    www.Snapappliance.com

  32. Well... by Ailure · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Certain politicans and famous people in Sweden didn't like the actions of piratbyrån. They deem them too harsh, and they use contrersional teqniques that is deemed imorally in Sweden (but probably would be ok by US standards, go figure). Antipiratbyrån had bad press lately, and this is not making it better. Not at all. I'm not saying that stuff should be free on the net as some zealots may say, but they're using teqniques that is just... wrong. Heh, I used to have Bahnof as ISP. It was my first "broadband" ISP. At first I was quite relived at how much faster than dial-up it was. Then I was plagured with alot of down-times... I switched back to Tele2 eight months later, thought using their ADSL service instead.

    1. Re:Well... by lordsilence · · Score: 1

      Deem them too hard? If you didn't know (even if you now seem to be a swedish citizen as you use Å in Antipiratbyrån), Sweden is not a state of the USA. It's a country in the north of Europe and we dont follow American laws (yet). We dont value the freedom of paying high bills to multibillion companies.

      Oh.. and I did rip off Piratebays reply to a cease and desist letter ;)

    2. Re:Well... by Ailure · · Score: 1

      ...I realise, I wrote piratbyrån. Not antipiratbyrån. xD

      Why you should not post slashdot comments late at night... yeah I was critizing antipiratbyrån (Anti-Piracy Bureau) not the awesome torrent site with the similar name. Which I use quite often for... nice stuff.

      Thoose letters are just so awesome... xD

    3. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come on moderators. The guy is just rambling...

  33. wrong term by Rydia · · Score: 1, Redundant

    That's not really planting evidence, it's a form of entrapment.

    1. Re:wrong term by _GNU_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      And of course as you should know, in Sweden, entrapment is illegal.

  34. Who polices the police? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Who audits the auditors?

  35. What about giving them illegal stuff? by Otto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What do you call it when the cop gives you a kilo of grass, tells you it's free, then busts you for having it?

    Or closer to this case: If somebody comes up and hands me a bunch of weed for free, then goes and gets a cop and tells them I have weed, and the cop comes and busts me?

    Basically, somebody gave the guy servers and loaded warez onto them, then told the cops to bust the man. You can't tell me that's right. I may not know the legal terminology here, but it still ain't right nevertheless.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    1. Re:What about giving them illegal stuff? by CustomFort · · Score: 1

      The first case is clearly entrapment. Read my post carefully. If the police officer approaches you, it is probably entrapment. If you approach him, it proably isn't.

      The second case is not entrapment because the police officer didn't give you the marijuana. If the guy who gave it to you was acting on behalf of the police, and wasn't prosecuted himself, then it would be entrapment. (Don't accept drugs from strangers...)

      I'm not saying it's right. It's just not the police's fault. There is nothing to keep you from turning the other guy in.

    2. Re:What about giving them illegal stuff? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In order to be fair, the state (by which I mean, the establishment) should also prosecute the uploader. They have admitted to comitting a crime, basically...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  36. There's more... Possession vs. distribution? by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
    Another thing I haven't seen anyone bring up yet is this:

    If the charge is distributing copyrighted material, how are they going to prove that this was going on?

    Possession is not illegal. Sharing between friends is fully legal in Sweded, AFAIK.

    So they can't bust you for having things on your computer, and how are they going to prove that you are distributing it? They would have to monitor your connection in real-time, wouldn't they?

    If not, then what prevents me from doctoring logs "showing" my annoying neighbor distributing copyrighted material and getting his door kicked in by the industry's henchmen?

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  37. In what legal theory? by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

    a) A license (or broader: "authorization") to distribute freely, does not imply a change in its copyright status. See BSD, GPL or any other license.

    b) By default distribution and reproduction are exclusive rights of the copyright holder. Even if you legally download it (signing no license at all), none of those rights have been given to you.

    Perhaps you should read 5 of the GPL (it applies equally well to any other software without a license):

    "You are not required to accept this License, since you have not signed it. However, nothing else grants you permission to modify or distribute the Program or its derivative works. These actions are prohibited by law if you do not accept this License."

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:In what legal theory? by Pofy · · Score: 1

      >b) By default distribution and reproduction are
      >exclusive rights of the copyright holder. Even if
      >you legally download it (signing no license at
      >all), none of those rights have been given to
      >you.

      Not entierly correct. The distribution is a one time (or first time) excluive right only. After the first initial sale, or give away or whatever distribution the copyright holder decides to use, that right is lost and further redistribution is allowed. That is why we have second hand shops selling books, CDs and so on.

      You still can't make additional copies though, but then, you can download more than once should you want.

    2. Re:In what legal theory? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The theory that says anyone uploading material onto a p2p server must have a reasonable expectation of large numbers of people seeing that material. Since an agent of the legitimate copyright holder made an action that intentionally distributed that material to the public we can say that an implicit license was included with the distribution.

      Copyright ownership can only be transfered by explicit written statement but a license can be implicit.

      Think of it this way, if the legitimate copyright owner put their material next to a photocopier in a public place with a note attached saying "go for it guys" then anyone making a copy could reasonably claim that they had permission to do so... even without a real license. Uploading onto a p2p network is pretty much the same.

  38. Been there, done that by mekkab · · Score: 1

    I college I had a job as an assistant Sys Admin.

    One day while talking about sending an e-mail to the users to delete files and make space, he asks me "Do you know who this user Warez is?" (*It was for a very small department of mostly post docs)

    Feeling that hunch I say "I'm not sure, how do you spell it?"

    "W-A-R-E-Z"

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  39. What constitutes "hard time" in a Swedish prison? by swb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm pretty sure that Sweden has Bad People(TM) like every other place, but for some reason socialist propaganda (generally not Swedish) and common stereotypes suggest that just about everything except the weather is a little kinder, gentler and more socially aware than everywhere else.

    For some reason I envision a maximum security prison in Sweden being more like a college dorm than a prison.

  40. This means little coming from someone... by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1

    ...with "unf." for a sig.

  41. Rather different system... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

    Our liability figures are low here in Scandinavia, so it probably wouldn't be worth the effort by itself. Right now, this is mostly a PR disaster. It does have some very interesting criminal prosecution possibilities though, all Bahnhof needs to do is to press charges. From there the public justice system would drag APB through court, and Bahnhof would have a walk-over in civil court afterwards. That is much more common here.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  42. Another interesting misshap made by APB. by hpj · · Score: 5, Informative
    On another note a on misshaps that the totally out of control Swedish APB has made is that they managed to put an interview with their chief legal officer with the Swedish public radio on the front page of their webpage without aquiring the rights to do so from the copyright holder (The radio station).

    For you guys who know swedish hereis an interview where the public radio calls Henrik Pontén (The APB lawyer in question previously) and ask him how they could do that. My favourite quote (Liberally translated to English): "We are currently very busy hunting pirates. I don't have time to check our webpage every day".

    /Mauritz

    1. Re:Another interesting misshap made by APB. by BigBadDude · · Score: 1



      didnt you just made the same mistake by posting the mp3 file to slashdot? :)

    2. Re:Another interesting misshap made by APB. by mikehunt · · Score: 1

      Many thanks for that, I nearly fell of my chair from laughing!

      Just make sure you don't get SR after you!

    3. Re:Another interesting misshap made by APB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the last part reminded me of:
      "all be vewy,vewy quiet. I'm hunting piwates"

    4. Re:Another interesting misshap made by APB. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa, did YOU get permission from SR to reproduce that on the web ?

  43. So they have the privilege ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to be outlaws ?

  44. Illegal Activity? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Uh... According to their own admission, the "opposition" hijacked a domain belonging to the Antipiratbyrån. That's about the only illegal activity going on here that I see. This doesn't help the cause.

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
  45. Re:What constitutes "hard time" in a Swedish priso by hyfe · · Score: 1
    For some reason I envision a maximum security prison in Sweden being more like a college dorm than a prison.

    I have never heard of anybody getting raped in a norwegian prison, nor have I ever heard about anybody being beaten up without anybody caring. Nor have, in fact, ever heard any bad prison stories being told.

    Clean prisons are what seperates us from the savages.

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
  46. Did you read... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Informative

    ..the sig of the person you're correcting? "(...) I am a lawyer. (...)"

    Copyrights must be defended. Failing to do so means you lose your copyright.

    Copyright does not have to be defended. Patents and trademarks must be. If you are careless with your copyright *notices*, it may exempt violators from liability. However, most any software/movie etc is full of copyright notices. As long as it is clearly marked as copyrighted, nothing can undo it nor the liabilities.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    1. Re:Did you read... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually patents don't have to be either. And while trademarks actually don't _need_ to be strictly policed, the minimum amount of policing that is needed is not well defined, so people err on the side of caution.

      Also failure to provide notice won't exempt violators from liability, but will have a potential effect on the amount of damages recoverable.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    2. Re:Did you read... by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      not a lawyer but,

      Copyrighted material no longer needs to be marked with notices to protect it. Copyright now exists as soon as set into fixed form.

      Collecting damages in excess of actual damages typically requires registration with the copyright office though (some special cases can qualify without registration iirc).

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
    3. Re:Did you read... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Also failure to provide notice won't exempt violators from liability, but will have a potential effect on the amount of damages recoverable.

      I could swear I had read something like that, so I digged a little deeper. This is a quote from a class at cornell.edu: "Generally, a claim of innocent infringement is not a defense against a finding of infringement. An innocent infringer is liable for the infringement, but a court may reduce -- or, in some instances, remit altogether -- the amount of damages.[264]"

      What I was actually thinking of was the IBM vs SCO case, where one of IBMs counterclaims is that SCO has "unclean hands", meaning SCO has done something unethical in regards to the infringement. Not providing a copyright notice could be considered unethical in many situations, not by accidental release though.

      Kjella

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    4. Re:Did you read... by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

      Well, zero statutory damages are only available in rare cases. Check out 17 USC 504(c)(2). Plus, that doesn't absolve those infringers of liability, only statutory damages. 502 injunctive relief is still possible; 503 impounding and destruction are still available; 505 costs and fees are still available; and 504 actual damages and profits are available in place of statutory damages at the plaintiff's option.

      So there's still liability, and there's still plenty of remedies. Only one remedy -- in extremely rare cases -- might not be available.

      As for failure to provide notice, I kind of doubt that that's going to be seen as unclean hands sufficient to deny a plaintiff equity. Could be it's happened before, but that's not quite what's normally meant.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    5. Re:Did you read... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some cases not defending your copyrights can be grounds for your suit to be thrown out but that is usually handled as an abuse of copyright. One big example is a SCO like situation where you refuse to provide the information necessary to remedy the infringement because you do not want to stop the infringement. Another case would be where you know about it but you decide to let it continue to increase your damages rather than telling the infringing person/company to stop. If you pull those kinds of dirty tricks and it can be proven not only can you lose all damages but your copyrights can actually be revoked.

  47. Re:What constitutes "hard time" in a Swedish priso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Well, its generally agreed that swedish prisons are probably amongst the most humane in the world. You get a tv in your cell, get good food, permissions, etc.

    I heard, however, an interview with a swedish drug smuggler that got sentenced to prison in thailand. He said that hed rather be in a thai prison than a swedish, because the fellow prisoners that get inprisoned there are much more likely to be "normal" people (criminality because of poverty, etc), whereas the relatively few people that get to swedish long term prisons generally arent the people that youd want to hang around with.

  48. This story has been spun into nonsense by geekee · · Score: 1

    They're not going to plant someone in a ISP for years to set up a server to bust the ISP. For likely, the infiltrator is actually an informant who cut a deal.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
    1. Re:This story has been spun into nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cutting deals is not done here. The prosecution would never do that. If you get busted you will get prosecuted to the full extent of the law no matter how much you rat out others.

  49. Vikings Arrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Aren't Swedish Pirates called Vikings and don't they wear Horny hats instead of Eye patches?

  50. Re:What constitutes "hard time" in a Swedish priso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep. You get paid as an inmate in a Swedish prison. You get better food in the prison than the student at the public schools. You get to watch television and do other nice stuff all day long.

    We have people who, on a yearly basis, assaults someone just to be able to spend the cold winter months in jail.

    Ah, and we don't have any "three strokes and your out" rule either.

  51. Re:What constitutes "hard time" in a Swedish priso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, a "life sentence" is in general less than twenty years. Many here (and in Europe in general) consider the U.S. system quite cruel - not only due to the longer sentences but also the lack of compensation when mistakes are made - I remember reading about one case where someone was set free after 40 years but didn't receive any compensation (it was on CNN but I don't remember the names of those involved). Obviously, we've had some innocent people sentenced as well but they do get quite good compensation - and there's no need to sue anybody to receive it, last year one man that had been falsely convicted of murder and served 10 years received ~1.2 million (in USD). I consider our "softer" system better than the U.S. system since our crime rate is so much lower but do think that we should have the option to sentence the worst of the worst to life in prison so that it really means life.

  52. Re:What constitutes "hard time" in a Swedish priso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Btw, a "maximum security prison" is viewed as an oxymoron by most people here in sweden because of a whole load of high profile escapes during the last few years.

    Yesterdays front side news, for example, was that a sex murderer considered one of swedens most dangerous men escaped. He was on a walk with two (unarmed) wardens, when he ran away. One of them followed him, but was confonted by him waving a gun (a soft air gun as it turned out) standing next to a car with a nursery student (that also happened to be an olympic athlete) that he had seduced when she had her practice in his "closed" psychiatric unit. She helped him escape, but they were captured with no troubles a few hours ago. Freaky stuff! =/

  53. Not how escrow system works. by Kjella · · Score: 1

    my understanding of most escrow systems is that only the decrypt keys are stored in escrow, meaning while you can READ data with escrow key, you cannot write it, and thus you cannot tamper with data.

    The way almost every public cryptosystem work is that the data is encrypted with a symmetric key, and this key is encrypted using public/private cryptography. Escrow systems have an additional private key to let you recover the symmetric key. At this point, you may modify any data you want.

    The only way to avoid this is if you sign your data (assuming your private key is not also held in escrow, in which case they obviously can forge your identity). However, many times you use encryption without signing (I send a message to Bob, only Bobs private key can decrypt it, that's what I want) and in the case of encrypted storage systems you never do this.

    So no, having an escrow key is in most cases as good as having the real one.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  54. P2P legal? by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    So this means that there are no warez on P2P servers unless planted by agent provocateurs?

    Now I can sleep undisturbed again, knowing all is well ..

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  55. this sounds familiar ... by SimonInOz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on, hand them over - we know you have weapons of mass destruction, we have the receipts!

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  56. Re:What constitutes "hard time" in a Swedish priso by Hannes+Eriksson · · Score: 3, Funny

    For some reason I envision a maximum security prison in Sweden being more like a college dorm than a prison.
    I suspect that might be more correct insight than intended. There are people going to Sweden who would regard emprisonment a paid vacation. Maybe not maximum security prison, but prision isn't a punishment in .se, it's a way of keeping society safe. Now I'm getting carried away again. I'd better stop typing. Argv, I cannot! but.. well, uhm. aaaaah[connection reset by peer]

    --
    Geek rants since like... 2000 or something.
  57. What I *really* don't get by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do we (in this country, sweden, [I as a citizen of it, can only ask this of my country! You, you ought to ask it of your's..] ) live in a democratic society or a communistic one? ... I mean, we take away people's right to what is theirs .. and still insist to force it upon them, even though they do not want to comply. [this is the 'Unauthorized FileShareing [1]'-business, isn't it!!! deprive people of their right to what they've created...]

    And !NO, don't give me any of 'those' excuse! If you don't like what they what as compensation for their works ... then move along, ignore them, and seek out people who'd like to share their works with you ... but for the 'Luve of my QuadDamage' don't force them to give it to you. That's like holding someone at gunpoint, and asking them to comply .... *jisses* where did 'free will' go all of a suddon?

    I brougth in 'Communism' into the disscussion because that's the closes thing that [I found] describes 'Unauthorized FileShareing[1]'. I ask you, doesn't the description fit?

    • A scheme of equalizing the social conditions of life;
      specifically, a scheme which contemplates the abolition of
      inequalities in the possession of property, as by
      distributing all wealth equally to all, or by holding all
      wealth in common for the equal use and advantage of all.
      [1913 Webster]

    How would you feel if 'we' came into your house and started sharing your stuff with whom ever we choose? Would you like that?

    Didin't you mother teach you to, "Don't treat someone, the way you wouldn't like to be treated."? ...
    ----

    1 - Aquireing 'goods' (film, music, games, apps, books... etc etc) from a party that isn't amongs your peers.

    NOTE: *just* 'FileShareing', amongst you and your peers (friends, and close friends of friends [to an extent/limit... as philosophically everyone on this planet can be seen as a friend of a friends :-)]) ought never be ilegall ... and not of the 'Unauthorzied FileSharing' I'm talking about...

  58. Re: "Oh Snap?" by espressojim · · Score: 1

    Homey D. Clown (Damon Wayans) from In living color (circa 1990) called, they want their tag line back.

    Talk about freakin' dated.

    If you want to be a bit more modern (think: this millenium), please say "That's BULLCRAP!!!!"

    Yes, all in caps, or you don't have RealUltimatePower!

  59. STIM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    STIM is the Swedish equivalent of RIAA, but more for the artist than the record labels themselves.

    1. Re:STIM by lightcycle · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, this is not correct. STIM is an organization dedicated to protect composers, mostly collecting royalties from radiostations etc. for broadcasting music. The American equivalent of this would be ASCAP.

      --

      The stars that shine and the stars that shrink
      in the face of stagnation the water runs before your eyes
  60. Re:What constitutes "hard time" in a Swedish priso by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    That's really beautiful, however in the US we spend a lot of effort keeping people in poverty and a kinder gentler prison system doesn't work on those people. It is absolutely ridiculous what we're doing, and also WRT the people unjustly imprisoned especially. Our prison is just a breeding ground for more dangerous criminals and a destroyer of lives. It is definitely more punitive than helpful...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  61. FYI by gagge · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Again, APB (Anti-Piracy Bureau) is not a law-enforcement bureau, it's not connected to the government in any way. It's a lobby organisation for the film and music industry. Strangely, they get the police to do whatever they tell them, they even appear on site at the same time as the police during busts. The police even recommended on their website that piracy crimes should be reported to APB, not the police.

    1. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not connected to the government in any way (except financially).

  62. Proof? Proof? Ve don neeed no steenkin proof.... by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    Hmmm creative, but I don't think making sure that they have a bullet proof logging system is the first priority of most warez ftp servers...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  63. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by n3k5 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Though they think of themselves as prosperous, Swedes as a group are actually worse off than black Americans, according to this Swedish study.
    What the linked study says is true, the numbers are sound. But numbers like the GDP per capita are only a part of the picture. If you condense the statistics down to one average American and one average Swede, you ignore that there are lots of poor Americans who are made up for by the top 1% Americans who have 1/3 of the wealth. In Sweden that curve is a lot more even. If you have a look at reports plotting the quality of life in countries of the world, Sweden usually makes the top 5 while the US aren't even in the top 20. Another issue with the GDP/capita is that, while it is a nicely internationally standardised and generally useful figure, it measures how much people produce. Americans produce more, thus earn higher wages, and use those to consume more. In the process they harm their environment much more, which isn't represented by the GDP. The US also have a huge national debt. In comparison, your average Swedes do have problems with unemployment, but those that have work also choose to work less and have more leisure time. They also don't want to have 3 TV sets and 2 cars per household.

    As far as the economic statistics go, I don't intend to contradict the parent poster at all, I just want to say you have to take them with the customary grain of salt. It's a different story with the crime rates: The parent is plain wrong. Crime rates in Sweden, and most of the EU in general, are lower than in the US. The provided link didn't work for me; maybe it was related to that Interpol report that inflated Sweden's murder rate to some 500% because of a statistical error? Again you must take care not to oversimplify things; maybe there are more pickpockets per capita in Sweden than in the US, or maybe they catch more pickpockets in Sweden (because the police aren't so occupied with homicides?), but when you visit Sweden you definitely don't have to be afraid that something really bad will happen to you. The crime rate is low.

    Speaking of crimes, the actual topic would have been something about piracy or so? Oh well. Maybe next time.
    --
    but what do i know, i'm just a model.
  64. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they make comparison in absolute numbers instead of against metrics like GDP - by this measure every European country is poor. And forget that with all that poor-dom, Sweden provides universal medical care, which American working poor can only dream of.

  65. Re: "Oh Snap?" by djdavetrouble · · Score: 1

    You may not realize this hanging out on "slashdot" all day, but Oh Snap! is currently under revival status by way of the decade old meme act of 1984. It is currently being used heavily on vh1, mtv, and other such oracles of pop culture, and its hil-fucking-arious. A quick search of your "World Wide Web" shows over 60,000 results, thereby cementing its relevance. Fa Sheezy.

    --
    music lover since 1969
  66. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

    If you condense the statistics down to one average American and one average Swede, you ignore that there are lots of poor Americans who are made up for by the top 1% Americans who have 1/3 of the wealth.

    True enough. Maybe that's why the post used median values instead? As from the blog:

    Black people, who have the lowest income in the United States, now have a higher standard of living than an ordinary Swedish household," the HUI economists said.

    If Sweden were a U.S. state, it would be the poorest measured by household gross income before taxes, Bergstrom and Gidehag said. . . .

    The median income of African American households was about 70 percent of the median for all U.S. households while Swedish households earned 68 percent of the overall U.S. median level.

    This meant that Swedes stood "below groups which in the Swedish debate are usually regarded as poor and losers in the American economy," Bergstrom and Gidehag said.

    Between 1980 and 1999, the gross income of Sweden's poorest households increased by just over six percent while the poorest in the United States enjoyed a three times higher increase, HUI said.

    (emphasis mine)
  67. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by jtogel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Very true. As a Swede living in the UK for the moment I have a hard time convincing lightheaded idealists and ordinary people alike that Sweden is very far from the paradise on earth they all too often envision it to be.

    Even the almighty Swedish labour unions nowadays admit that the true unemployment figure is around 20%, far from the 5% the official statistics would have it at. Very few of my highly qualified friends back home have been able to find any sort of job at all upon leaving university.

    Crime statistics do not make for uplifting reading either, and ethnic tensions are on the rise (partly because of the astronomic unemployment figures among immigrant - there is a part of Malmö where 90% do not have a (legal) job). Looking at those who do work, the disposable income per capita compares unfavorably to almost any other western nation.

    This is not because of the current macroeconomic plunge. In fact, Swedish export industries are currently doing well. Yet, unemployment and related problems are, if anything, on the rise.

    These facts and figures are currently hotly debated in domestic media, though opinions on what to do about the mess obviously differ sharply. In my view the probable root cause is a combination of the worlds highest taxes, the worlds most powerful labour unions and the worlds probably most generous sick leave benefits.

  68. Um. No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Didin't you mother teach you to, "Don't treat someone, the way you wouldn't like to be treated."? ... "

    No.

  69. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Sweden provides universal medical care, which American working poor can only dream of."

    So what you're saying is that by US standards, everybody lives in poverty, but if they get sick, they get free doctor visits?

    Is this about right?

  70. Re:Hmm... here i fixed your content. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > 1) Police don't make deals. Procecutors do.
    The police (at least in the US) can and do make deals with suspects, prior to arrest.

    > 2) Swedish procecutor's do not. It's an american practice.
    No idea about that, but smells like bullshit to me...

    [snip]

    > If that's the case, then I don't think the argument of planting evidence is going to work.
    There is a concept in jurisprudence called the Chain of Custody. This is how the integrity of evidence of criminality is maintained. The fact that the evidence in this case may be attributed to investigators hired by the plantiff (complainant) pretty much nixes the usefulness of it in any criminal prosecution.

    >Entrapment isn't legal even if the police do it...
    Beautiful. Tie it all together with the most misunderstood concept in pop criminal justice. To be brief, entrapment is not a crime. Entrapment has nothing whatsoever to do with planting evidence. It is defined in criminal procedure law as an affirmative defense, meaning that AT TRIAL a defendant would use this defense in order to say, "Yeah I did the actions alleged, but I cannot be convicted because any reasonable person would be compelled to do the same in those (entrapping) circumstances." (For instance, Officer Joe, out of the blue, says he'll give you ten million dollars if you (an IT professional who has never committed a crime) find him a bag of heroin. You track one down and he arrests you for criminal sale of a controlled substance. Basically entrapmemnt is if the act is something a reasonable person would do only because of the extenuating offer.)

    >...It certainly isn't legal when a private citizen does it.
    And, yeah. Wrong-o. Entrapment is only relevant if the offer comes from law enforcement in an effort to catch you committing a crime. (If I offer you ten million dollars to get me a bag of heroin and you do, thats a crime.)

    Yes I work in law enforcement.

  71. However, "entrapment" isn't what most people think by Antaeus+Feldspar · · Score: 1
    Most people think that any time a law enforcement agency participates in any way in the performance of a crime, it's "entrapment". This is not the case. Entrapment only occurs when the argument can be made that the parties at trial would not have committed this crime except for the actions of law enforcement.

    Which means that if you are driving along in a car in an area where prostitutes are known to congregate and you slow down next to a woman dressed like a prostitute and she says "50 bucks for a date; you buying?" and you say "Yeah" and she says "Too bad; I'm Vice Squad" then good luck telling a jury that it's entrapment. You clearly went there looking for some prostitute; the police did not create that crime by putting out an undercover officer pretending to be a prostitute.

    --
    If people are to respect the law, perhaps the law should begin by respecting the people.
  72. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by jakethecake · · Score: 0

    http://hdr.undp.org/reports/global/2004/pdf/hdr04_ HDI.pdf Read up on that, We are not top 2 in the Human development index for nothing....

  73. Re:What constitutes "hard time" in a Swedish priso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most complaints from norwegian prisons seem to center around how the food system works. (they get an alloted amount of points to spend each week, if I recall correctly, and buying health food and vegetables and fruit and such is difficult due to those items being more costly than meat and other "unhealthy" foodstuffs.)

  74. Re:However, "entrapment" isn't what most people th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    So the correct way of getting a prostitute would be along the lines of...

    Drive up to a woman dressed as a prostitute and start asking for directions.

    If it is a prostitute, it's likely they'll try to convince you to buy sex. If it is a cop, they may try the same thing.

    You reply along the lines of... "well, I just wanted to get to ...., but I guess we can do that...

    If it is a prostitute, your mission was successful. If it was a cop, she can't arrest you because you've clearly state it wasn't your intent to pay for sex, and are doing it because she suggested it and if you just get directions, you can just move on and try again.

  75. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by n3k5 · · Score: 1

    You are right: I had accidentially ignored the fact that median values are used, which deal with the issue of 1/3 of the US's wealth belonging to just 1% of the population. But still the flatter distribution of Swedish incomes means that poor Swedes are generally (ie on average) closer up to the Swedish median value than poor Americans are to the American median value, and household gross income still isn't the only factor as far as the standard of living is concerned. That aside, the Swedes are even poorer than I thought already, thanks for the correction.

    --
    but what do i know, i'm just a model.
  76. Stupid... very stupid... by Eternal+Annoyance · · Score: 2, Informative

    If the swedish court gets air of this, they can say bye-bye to their case. And after that they'll get sued... or even get charged with criminal offenses. Courts don't like people/organisations who plant evidence, most nations even have laws forbidding that kind of action.

  77. Name 'Rouge' probably not a mistake by larske · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The name is probably taken from the popular swedish agent novel Coq Rouge (meaning red rooster, code name for the agent in the novel). It is a perfect name for an infiltrator.

    1. Re:Name 'Rouge' probably not a mistake by Demonspunk · · Score: 0

      Would be the perfect name except that its an already popular term calling yourself "Mole", "Infiltraitor" or some popular equivalent doesn't encourage trust...

  78. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by Kirth · · Score: 1

    Speaking of crimes, the actual topic would have been something about piracy or so?

    No, the original topic was something with illegal copying, nothing with naval robbery.

    --
    "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
  79. why "piracy" is not theft by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The IFPI/RIAA is fighting a lost cause. And I think they know it.

    First off all, I have difficulties with their acclaimed 'stealing' of music. As far as I know, stealing implies that the one that has been stolen has been derived of something. When you take a copy, you do not take the original away, thus they have not 'lost' anything. They might claim that they loose money when ppl d/l music, but even that is far from certain. Not only is it not shown statistically to have had that effect (they didn't even show a correlation thusfar - see aussie music-news - let alone a causality). Furthermore, in an individual case, they would have to show they actually lost revenue. Which is far from said, because I sure know some guys who d/l music, but would NEVER have bought that music if they were unable to d/l it. So, how did the RIAA/IFPI loose revenue, exactly? And if they didn't lose anything, how can the term 'stealing' apply?

    It would still be copyright-infringement, ofcourse, but that's another matter. I think maybe it's time we went beyond our current system of copyrights and walk into the era of cyberspace. With the industrial revolution, patents and copyrights knew a high flight, maybe it's time to let it leave and try something new? Maybe something in the lines of this: fairshare (http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/*checkout*/ freenet/website/pages/fairshare.php?rev=1.1).

    And don't worry, contrary to what the RIAA claims, musicians will not starve to death, and music-making will not stop. We had music long before we had copyrights, and we will have music long after copyrights have vanished from the scene.

    And lastly, it's something that *can not* be stopped. P2P progs and their development act as organisms that follow the darwinian rules of survival. When Napster was 'killed' by the RIAA, immediately others (like kazaa) took over, being more resistent to attacks from the RIAA&co. Whenever kazaa will be shut down, others again will take over. When endusers are targeted, systems that protect the user will become dominant (like FreeNet).

    It really is a lost cause. But then again, they are not truelly battling for the survival of musicians (as I said; they will survive, just as they used to do), it's for their OWN survival they are fighting. There is no way in hell they are going to keep the giant profits that they have been gathering for the last decades.

    But ultimately, they will have to do what P2P systems are already doing: adapt to the new circumstances (and forget about the former levels of profit), or whither and die.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  80. Re: "Oh Snap?" by iainl · · Score: 1

    As my brother-poster pointed out, your phrase is about 15 years old.

    "Oh Snap!" may date back a lot longer, but the mighty Bree Van Den Camp said it a lot more recently. And you do NOT want to fuck with the Bree.

    --
    "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  81. Living Language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes "pirate" has more than one meaning... a real meaning and a rubbish propaganda meaning. Avoiding the propaganda meaning is a way of showing your self respect and decency.

    We have seen time and again that wordsmiths with an axe to grind are all too ready to butcher the language and hijack words in an attempt to confuse the gullible: freedom fighter / terrorist, gay / homosexual, disabled / challenged, bribe / expense payment... the list is as long as you like.

    Sure we have a living language and that's why each person gets to decide what they are willing to accept and thus make their mark on the future (be it positive or negative).

  82. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    This meant that Swedes stood "below groups which in the Swedish debate are usually regarded as poor and losers in the American economy," Bergstrom and Gidehag said.

    They are. You're not comparing apples to apples here. For example, we Swedes have according to this reasoning become substantially richer during the past two-three years, as the dollar have lost about a third of its value against the krona.

    Made us all a lot richer, didn't it? No, of course not. If anything it made us poorer because too much of our export is priced in dollars. Our standard of living as such hasn't changed because of this (yet, companies insure themselves against market fluctuations), while we're now ostensibly earning about what the average american does.

    Truth of the matter is that the GDP per capita (average/median whatever) is a pretty poor indicator of wealth as it doesn't take the cost of living for the average family into account. Comparing with the time I worked in the US, yes, I made a lot more money, but it was almost all of it eaten up by a much higher cost of living. What little was left can be attributed to the difference between rich/poor here, i.e. I would be allowed to soar higher above the median/average, but also allowed to slide lower below it than here.

    When you take many more factors into account then the picture is a lot different. Crime rate is one such. The "murder rate" (i.e. death due to violence, the courts don't factor into it) in the US is sky high compared to ours, some 8-9 times higher in fact. It's of course an interesting statistic in that it is fairly consistent from country to contry. And even within the same country over time. (Compared to say number of complaints filed, which is not.)

  83. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    If Sweden were a U.S. state, it would be the poorest measured by household gross income before taxes, Bergstrom and Gidehag said. . . .

    They would, if the cited work wasn't complete bunk to begin with.

    Benchmarks don't lie. Liars (in this case a right wing so called "think tank") do benchmarks.

  84. Clarifacition by Ailure · · Score: 1

    Anti-piratbyrån not piratbyrån. I use that torrent site myself, I actually quite like it. And heh, althought I still had bad experinces with the bahnof ISP...

  85. Slashdot hits the bottom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember SDFM? Yeah, that FTP site had superb US link and amazing hardware donated by the generous US law enforcement. I bet former Fastlane members and a few others still remember. That is what I call entrapment or a honeypot or whatever.

    Rouge, OTOH, is a citizen who had ran his own site in the past before joining the big boys' ECD club. In the beginning everything goes fine: rouge enjoys being at the top of the game by

    1) being a siteop on ECD, the couriering scene's "best kept secret"
    2) winning a few weektops on it (and getting caught of cheating)

    I suppose the horde of siteops on ECD started to fight about some nonsense after these golden months, because in the original (swedish) version of Bahnhof's report it says that rouge wasn't able to join ECD's staff channel any more. While the common practise in the warez scene is that trading monkeys and hardware-for-leech -donators shut up and sink in despair after losing their hold and money on a site, rouge chose to give the big boys a lesson.

    It's just pathetic how APB couldn't handle the biggest "amateur piracy" case they will ever have in their hands. Shame on them.

    Sidenote: I feel disgusted by the young swedish warez kids who think that internet piracy is a constitutional right to them. Wake up kids: there's no fun in doing it when it's legal and riskless.

  86. Re:Hmm... here i fixed your content. by jschrod · · Score: 1

    You might work in US law enforcement, but you have no idea at all about European laws, in particular about Swedish ones. This is a case in Sweden, you ignorant fool -- and Sweden is in Europe, in case you didn't know that.

    --

    Joachim

    People don't write Manifestos any more -- what's going on in this world? [Frank Zappa]

  87. This happened to us. by vonFinkelstien · · Score: 1
    I teach English at a private school in Sweden. The former IT guy (I never met him) installed a bunch of unlicensed software (MS-SQL server, Windows 2003 Server, etc.) while saying that they were licensed. Then after he was laid off (or maybe quit -- I don't know the details), he called the Anti-pirat byrå and ratted on the school.

    Even with a good lawyer's help, we still ended up paying a large some of money.

    1. Re:This happened to us. by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Sorry to hear that. One more reason for schools and businesses to switch to linux or bsd.

      Maybe you can submit it as a story.

  88. Link to story on The local-Swedish news in English by jools33 · · Score: 1

    http://www.thelocal.se/article.php?ID=1157&date=20 050323&PHPSESSID=d224d8dd687aba3d6d5e5bff06fd9c03

  89. Re:Hmm... here i fixed your content. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing that I didnt restrict to the US or preface with "I have no idea about this" refers to US specific laws.

    The concept of entrapment is clearly defined in law, irrespective of jurisdiction, and it is not equal to planting evidence.

    Except in Sweden.

    I'm sorry that you were upset. I will try to find out today what this "Europe" is.

  90. Re:Link to story on The local-Swedish news in Engl by jools33 · · Score: 2, Informative
  91. ROUGE is RED by carabela · · Score: 1

    Wat yuo meen he cant spel? Havnt yuo read on teh /. recently? Don't you speak l33t?

    Seriously:
    Rouge is also french for red. Coq rouge is a red rooster (which also could be the origin of the word for cockroach, how suitable!). Try thinking a little bit outside the frame of english next time.

    --

    The more you know, the less you need. [Admin added: from me.]
  92. Re:Hmm... here i fixed your content. by Hinhule · · Score: 0

    In Sweden, entrapment is illegal.
    So is planting evidence.
    Doesn't look like anyone was entraped here though.

  93. Re:What constitutes "hard time" in a Swedish priso by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Perhaphs you've been to a norwegian prison. Perhaps you don't even live in Norway, and so you wouldn't hear anything about this.

    Don't be so bloody stupid, of course there is violence in norwegian prisons. Whenever you lock up violent people in a prison facility, you're bound to deal with violence, even in little, far away Norway.

  94. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by carabela · · Score: 1

    "there is a part of Malmö where 90% do not have a (legal) job"

    I take it you refer to the Rosengård area (where btw Juventus soccerstar Zlatan Ibrahimovic originates from).
    Malmö is a town of ~250.000 inhabitants, the third largest city in Sweden. The Rosengård area constitutes ~21.000 inhabitants from as many as 50 ethnical groups. The official unenployment rate is 7% although I do agree that it would be much more in reality, but not the phenomenal 90% you claim, including illegal jobs! Where did you get such a figure from?
    Just to give a perspective, that would be ~19.000 people you are talking about, including senior citizens and babies. Your 90% claim could be intepreted as hordes of vikings and immigrants doing nothing but piracy and illegalities (at least by some /.:ers with no clue about Sweden, bork bork!)

    Blaiming the union, taxes and sick leave benefits for swedish crime rates and poverty? Sheesh, you gotta be kidding me. Yes, I live in Malmö and I do not recognise the picture you are trying to post in /. of Sweden in a decay.
    IANA politician or patriot.

    --

    The more you know, the less you need. [Admin added: from me.]
  95. They won't listen by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    They've actually heard of "Swedish Chef" of the Muppets.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  96. Re:Sweden: More Crime and Poverty Than Mississippi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  97. Re: "Oh Snap?" by sp3tt · · Score: 1

    Hey, the Dune novels called. They want their word back.

  98. Oh my god! by doppleganger871 · · Score: 0

    It's all George Bush's and the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy! They were behind it!

  99. Link to full story on The Local by praps · · Score: 1
  100. Dammit. Here's the proper link. by praps · · Score: 1
  101. What gave them away... by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    What gave them away was their username, "BorkBorkBork".

    As anyone knows, if that had been a real account, it would have been "|30r||30r||30r|".

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
  102. Sigh-Ignorance is golden. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And pirates wonder why no one takes them seriously.

    Poster 1: Well piracy hurts the artist.

    Pirate 1: Well prove it then.

    Poster 1: Well here's my proof.

    Pirate 1: Oh phooy, that doesn't say what I want to say, so it must be rubbish.

    1. Re:Sigh-Ignorance is golden. by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      Well, do you HAVE said proof, or are you trolling?

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.