Slashdot Mirror

Here's a link for you.

This just in, Apple has handed over iCloud data over to law enforcement. Same Apple that said they never would, that refused to help the FBI get data from a mass shooter's phone in California. They now turned over data with a simple single request.

Story

Yep, it is officially worse to support Trump than to shoot and kill a bunch of people in a mass murder spree.

This just in, Apple has handed over iCloud data over to law enforcement. Same Apple that said they never would, that refused to help the FBI get data from a mass shooter's phone in California. They now turned over data with a simple single request.

Story

Yep, it is officially worse to support Trump than to shoot and kill a bunch of people in a mass murder spree.
Next up, DNC members in KKK hoods advocating post birth abortions (wish I was kidding on this)

Here's the deal with fake news. The corporate news agencies have a history of printing propaganda for the government. They started doing it for war strategy as a patriotic duty. Then they did it because their friends in the government asked them to. Then they did it for money, with the government's bribery disguised as ad buys from military contractors. Then the news agencies started selling the same service to foreign governments. The most successful news agencies were the ones that could sell the most fake news placement to the most foreign powers, while everyone else went out of business.

Then Obama and Clinton had the bright idea to put their campaign PR staff - Ben Rhodes, Zack Exley, Amanda Marcotte, etc - inside the very top national security agencies where they could tell the newspapers to print whatever they wanted, deliver the funding from your pocket, call it a national security priority, use the surveillance capabilities of the CIA, NSA, and GCHQ to identify anyone who resisted their PR, and use their authority to get those people fired from their jobs. They were caught selling access to this media/surveillance/punishment network to the Rothshilds, China, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Hamas, and al-Qaeda. That was Gamergate.

With all surviving mainstream media sources compromised and obviously fake as fuck, new news sources are cropping up to compete with them. Being new to the business, they have wildly varying quality and some of them like Zero Hedge and Russia Toady are run by Russian intelligence. However, any dissent threatens a very profitable business -- control of state funding through control of the human mind through control of information -- so the corrupted NATO governments are aggressively working hard at stamping out any and all competition by redefining everybody as a violent right-wing extremist and drawing state funding to harass and intimidate them.

The corrupted government agents are easy to identify. They use the words "transgender" and "social justice" and call anyone who disagrees with them "alt-right."

Your memory isn't the only thing that matters, and some of us remember the numerous birther lawsuits, the endless haranging that Obama was going to FEMA camp us into martial law, and all sorts of other nonsense which you were and are conspicuously silent about, but somehow expect the country to be "patriotic" and not badmouth the CURRENT occupant of the White House as he shoots his mouth off.

The fundamental inconsistencies are too great for this dynamic not to collapse on itself sooner than later. It's one thing to badger conservative straight white men into saying "ma'am" through clenched teeth when some bald potato of a man in a dress walks up to the counter, but it's different when you start badgering the very people who are used to doing the badgering. Feminists are now faced with a world where all the women's sports records are held by dudes and a lesbian who won't suck cock is called a bigot. The only thing holding it all together seems to be solidarity in their mutual hatred of white men.

That being said, the irony of feminism as an institution being usurped by men is kinda fucking hilarious.

Drive a car into peaceful protester's and kill some one

Peaceful protestor yeah
https://www.thegatewaypundit.c...

Shoot up a place of worship because the people there were black.

Dylan Roof was certifiably insane

Hold up against the federal government in a violent manner because they object to federal land policies.

The BLM acted illegally http://www.latimes.com/nation/...

Navarro rebuked federal prosecutors — using the words "flagrant" and "reckless" to describe how they withheld evidence from the defense — before saying "that the universal sense of justice has been violated" and dismissing the charges.

It wasn't the land use policies, it was the illegal railroading of a citizen.

I don't pretend my end of the political spectrum doesn't have assholes in it but clearly you do.

Sure you don't

Another update: The shooter was a member of Anti-Trump resistance. So, extremist Leftist.

Somehow, that wasn't what the shooter praised. The killer was a member of "Anti-Trump Resistance".

For a plethora of reasons that you apparently don't understand a digital snapshot is *way better than working on the machine.

There's a plethora of reasons why you shouldn't lecture people about not understanding something when you don't bother to read, as the false dichotomy of "use CrowdStrike image" or "FBI moves servers to their office" was addressed the first time. Of course the FBI would use images of the server for analysis - but images they they created, by using agents with functioning legs to go to the server while it's powered on.

Crowdstrike isn't some fly by night outfit.

Yeah.

The CrowdStrike report, released in December, asserted that Russians hacked into a Ukrainian artillery app, resulting in heavy losses of howitzers in Ukraine's war with Russian-backed separatists.

But the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) told VOA that CrowdStrike erroneously used IISS data as proof of the intrusion. IISS disavowed any connection to the CrowdStrike report. Ukraine's Ministry of Defense also has claimed combat losses and hacking never happened.

They are.

The FBI has never examined the DNC's computer servers - an omission that is beyond preposterous. It has instead relied on the reports produced by Crowdstrike, a firm that drips with conflicting interests well beyond the fact that it is in the DNC's employ. Dmitri Alperovitch, its co-founder and chief technology officer, is on the record as vigorously anti-Russian. He is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council, which suffers the same prejudice. Problems such as this are many.

So you're relying on a hack firm that is massively biased, both for being rabidly anti-Russian and for being hired by the DNC, which at the same time was one and the same Hillary's campaign. A campaign that knew the Uranium One deal was a liability for her, one that also ensnared John Podesta, Hillary's campaign manager. So it was time for some good old fashioned Swiftboating, and to project Hillary's Russian problems onto her opponent. As further proven by the Hillary campaign paying for the Steele Dossier - colluding with foreign intelligence agents. Something Mueller is equally uninterested in looking at as he is in analyzing the DNC servers.

Because your average Chinese citizen are brainwashed ignoramuses. Worse yet, it's not even a Chinese trait, rather a universal human one. Please see American and their consumption of MSM fake news. Oh Oh!!! But lookie what do we have here? Richard Pan, a California Senator, is introducing a bill to kill free speech as it requires state-sanctioned fact checkers to approve online content . Ministry of Truth!!!

The scumbag's explicit reference to guillotine shows, the French terror is what he wants for this country. He may be too stupid to do very much to advance this goal, but he is still a scumbag — just the kind to stand out there masked and shouting "Communism will win".

Adherents of the vilest and deadliest school of thought known to humanity, responsible for millions of deaths and economic devastation of entire countries, these people somehow remain acceptable for the polite society — and even find sympathetic moderators to upvote their murderous rhetoric. All the while, for example, the stupid schmucks of the (relatively) harmless KKK are hunted and persecuted as if they were Satan incarnates.

(sorry for posting as AC. I was moderating, and wanted a citation on the above. First I've seen it, and can't tell if it is fake news. But it is certainly interesting, and should be easy to prove/disprove.)

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

"The documents were copied on July 5th, five days before Seth Rich was murdered."

All this Trump-Russia stuff is just to distract us from the fact that on November 4th, Antifa super-saiyans are going to kill all the white people. I don't know about you all, but I'm going to stay home with my guns and defend my family and the President of the United States that day.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

http://www.wnd.com/2017/10/ant...

Trump didn't win. Clinton lost. And considering she was running against the least popular candidate in US electoral history, the vast majority of the focus should be on how much Clinton and the DNC failed.

You do know that Trump set a record both in vote tallies and more than doubled the number of votes received over his closest rival, Ted Cruz. http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

Sorry, but rather than the least popular candidate in US history, I claim that numbers like that illustrate that he is not only the most popular ever, but he also shares the values of the Republican party more than any other candidate in US history.

You don't get that sort of support by being unpopular and out of tune with your party.

I know that Republicans are the never wrong party, but you have to own this one. Trump is the soul of the party, and represents the total package of their ideals.

dfenstrate - That was a lucid, logical and cogent response. Thank you. Valuable for me to paste into my debate points for future reference. Needed a concision in my response to "White Supremacist terror is the greater threat." Okay, maybe 'concision' isn't a word. Yet. Until I repeat it enough. Muhahahaahahahah. P.S. The 'marine' who recently killed the two cops also happened to be Black (by casual observation), a Black Lives Supporter (by Facebook posts), and Muslim by, oh, his new name Muhammad Ali (Facebook again, which also contains his anti-white rants.) http://www.thegatewaypundit.co... Yeah, well, anyway, I just can't find myself to be worried that, in general, it would be former marines that are going to ram a building with aircraft full of passengers or shoot up a gay nightclub.

They ban trasgendered for no reason, but allow muslims to serve despite the many attacks by them: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

This is a factoid; there is no real reason to not think that the Democratic Party hack is 90% due to the internal grievances with the party misconduct toward Sanders: some intern dumped the data and then shared it to expose such petty behaviour.

His name was Seth Rich.

"At least we didn't cozy up to the religious right, spawn the TEA partiers, and elect a cheeto."

So instead of cozying up to the religious right (the group of people who founded, and fought and died to create the country that you live in and benefit from http://www.freerepublic.com/fo... ), spawned the Tea party (a grass roots set of peaceful organizations fed up with Washington politics and liberal overreach who left their protest and event grounds cleaner than when they arrive http://www.thegatewaypundit.co... ) and elected president Trump (the only non-politician citizen running for the office this last election cycle). Instead of doing all that, which you somehow think is horrendous, the left spawned:

-The sometimes violent/rapist Occupy movement that caused mass disruptions and cost large cities millions of dollars to clean up after http://www.nydailynews.com/new...
-The violent, rioting, police and law and order hating, racist Black Lives Matter group who were founded on a lie in Fergusun http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfro... went on to inspire a man to mass murder police officers in Dallas https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... and generally hate law enforcement http://dailycaller.com/2015/08...
-The left has spawned violent riots over conservative speakers http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/01/...
-The left has disrupted and shouted down conservatives and their events and violently attacked Trump supporters. http://www.theblaze.com/news/2...

There seems to be a large contingent of rabid fascists on the left and an even larger cross section of lefies who are so secure in their moral superiority that reality cannot intrude. The fascist left had better tone it down or they may end up facing the national guard and lead bullets the next time they try to violently assault someone else's freedom to assemble/speak. The rest of the left had better start paying more attention to reality and pull their heads out of their collective echo chamber (or their asses, I can never tell which is which with them).

Based on this comparison, I will take the conservative approach any day of the week and twice on Sunday. You should focus less on name calling and more on staying abreast of actual actions committed by these groups, both left and right.

They pretty much are already doing that. Media Matters of America,PoliticusUSA, and ThinkProgress are considered 'legitimate' news sources(check their 'Adjust Sources'). While they just removed sites like http://www.thegatewaypundit.co... in the last few months. All three of those sites are much worse than the thegatewaypundit at report accuracy. There is no way to add a personal source either.

Really, how many documented cases of speakers being prevented can you provide? How many injuries? How many hospitalizations?

Here are a few:

(1) Berkeley riots, which injured people, and caused the university to cancel a speech by Milo Yiannopoulos:

The university insists that it made elaborate preparations for protests. It canceled the speech only after what it called an “unprecedented” invasion of the campus by “more than 100 armed individuals clad all in black” who engaged in violent, destructive behavior. They hurled metal barricades, threw Molotov cocktails and smashed windows at the student union.

The event was cancelled after left-wing rioters, who the university claim were not students, smashed ATMs and bank windows, looted a Starbucks, beat Trump supporters, pepper sprayed innocent individuals, set fires in the street, and sprayed the words “Kill Trump” on storefronts.

Video was posted showing violent leftists chasing and beating a man with sticks.
The man appears unconscious in the street as they beat him.

(2) A speech at Middlebury College was severely disrupted by protesters. After the speech, when the speaker and Professor Allison Stanger left, they were attacked, and Prof. Stnager's neck was injured:

Then I went onstage, got halfway through my first sentence, and the uproar began.

First came a shouted recitation in unison of what I am told is a piece by James Baldwin. I couldn’t follow the words. That took a few minutes. Then came the chanting.
. . .
This went on for about twenty minutes.
. . .
Professor Stanger and I were led out of the hall to the improvised studio.
. . .
Then there was the sound of shouting outside, followed by loud banging on the wall of the building. . . . Then a fire alarm went off, which was harder to compete with.
. . .
We finished around 6:45 and prepared to leave the building . . . I didn’t see it happen, but someone grabbed Allison’s hair just as someone else shoved her from another direction, damaging muscles, tendons, and fascia in her neck.

There, several masked protesters, who were believed to be outside agitators, began pushing and shoving Mr. Murray and Ms. Stanger, Mr. Burger said. “Someone grabbed Allison’s hair and twisted her neck,” he said. . . . After the two got into a car, Mr. Burger said, protesters pounded on it, rocked it back and forth, and jumped onto the hood. Ms. Stanger later went to a hospital, where she was put in a neck brace.

(3) About 600 people protested the immigration ban at the Portland Airport. There was a 4-person counter-protest:

One of the counter-demonstrators was assaulted just after 5 p.m., Port of Portland spokesman Steve Johnson said.

Grant Chisholm, 39 of Portland told The Oregonian/Oregonlive that he was at the airport with three other members of the group Bible Believers for a counter-protest when a Trump opponent hit him in the head three times with something metallic. Chisholm dropped and drifted in and out of unconsciousness, he said, while vomiting a

Nope, not tired of winning

story about how the NYT changed their headline to remove the word Wiretap.

In the story is the ORIGINAL story as NYT printed it. You can't find it anymore because that story/headline proves Trump is correct, and the NYT can't have that.
Yea, NYT isn't biased. The are literally changing previously run stories that verify Trump's claims.

How you like them apples?

Having screamed for anti-immigrant violence and sexual assault becoming common place because of Trump, Illiberals could never offer any actual evidence. Maybe, this guy is what they need. Finally...

Yeah, that's why Robert Doggart was totally convicted, there was no evidence presented. And he didn't talk with anyone about his plans. Nor anyone else. The FBI is totally not reporting an increase in hate crimes either.

But hey, it's not like it's new in America. They even had the support of John Wilkes Booth. Remember him?

Meanwhile the number of victims of the "Black Lives Matter" assholes — the very foundation of their movement based on a lie — uncounted scores.

And then you read a few DOJ reports.

Gosh, I wonder why little old mi never mentions any of that. Is it because you support the authoritarian and oppressive police state that they represent?

Having screamed for anti-immigrant violence and sexual assault becoming common place because of Trump, Illiberals could never offer any actual evidence. Maybe, this guy is what they need. Finally...

Meanwhile the number of victims of the "Black Lives Matter" assholes — the very foundation of their movement based on a lie — uncounted scores.

When I saw the headline, my first thought was that slashdot had picked up the story about the major newspapers buying fake clicks from Chinese bots to increase their page rank and advertising revenue.

See here and here (or here).

it may also be used to track who is going to a political rally or protest, or who is visiting a dissident.

This would've been a valid concern, if being a "dissident" were in any way dangerous in our country. And it is not.

Certainly not lately — on the contrary, supporting the elected President or the majority-holding Party is what can get you beaten up or reported to your employer (and subsequently fired).

Dissidents in the US denounce the sitting President to the ovations from audiences, fearing not one bit neither for personal safety nor for job-prospects.

So, no, any concern over police identifying "dissidents" in a free country is invalid. But helping the officers separate known rioters from peaceful — even if excited — protesters is a useful thing.

But these days - in America at least - intellectuals trained in the same classical tradition as Winston Churchill are derided as beholden to the white male patriarchy. Hell, even figures previously associated with high minded ideals and liberty like Thomas Jefferson are now considered personas non grata. Meanwhile, the typical modern university does its best to train Alinskyite radicals.

Of course intellectuals are disdained. Thought is dead.

No shit.

Yale Students Demand English Department Stop Teaching White Male Poets

Petition to the Yale English Department Faculty

We, undergraduate students in the Yale English Department, write to urge the faculty to reevaluate the undergraduate curriculum. We ask the department to reconsider the current core requirements and the introductory courses for the major.

In particular, we oppose the continued existence of the Major English Poets sequence as the primary prerequisite for further study. It is unacceptable that a Yale student considering studying English literature might read only white male authors. A year spent around a seminar table where the literary contributions of women, people of color, and queer folk are absent actively harms all students, regardless of their identity. The Major English Poets sequences creates a culture that is especially hostile to students of color.

...

Sooo, English Literature without Shakespeare. WTF?!?!?! What's next? Physics without Einstein? Bohr? Fermi? Pauli? Faraday?

So much for "not be[ing] judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character."

Bunch of fucking racists, aren't they?

I'm asking for citations where the predictions were way off.

These are a dime-a-dozen. The Internet is full of such lists assembled. But they don't necessarily disprove anything — it is normal for a scientific discipline to fail sometimes. This article even analyzes different ways of detecting and dealing with such failures.

Trouble is, successful ones are so hard to find...

With the pace of global warming increasing, some climate change experts predict that the Scottish ski industry will cease to exist within 20 years.

It is now 2017, but snow is still plentiful in Scotland. Indeed, the 2014 was the snowiest since 1945. Do you think, the 2004 prediction will come true by 2024?

“you can argue that may be our projection of [an ice-free Arctic by 2013] is already too conservative.”

Whether or not Arctic sea ice is at "record low" or not, the Arctic Ocean is decidedly not "ice-free" today.

Yet you've provided zero. Odd.

I made no claims requiring citations. I merely pointed out, that folks claiming "science is settled" typically disappear, when asked for successful prediction of their favorite science.

Nope. If you actually believe in science, I have to provide you with successful ones that survived peer review and replication

That may be too onerous a requirement in the case of Climate Science — the experiments take many years, so any replication is difficult.

The amount of complaining on the internet hasn't changed.

I'll concede, that there was complaining and there still is — from another direction. But the quantitative estimate needs citations — what makes you think, the amount hasn't changed?

For example, over 8 years Obama racked up about a score of verified death-threats. It may be too early to tell for Trump, but if Bush is any indication, he'll have so many, Secret Service will stop investigating...

Indeed, I can not recall anyone beaten up, or anything set on fire or otherwise destroyed during an anti-Obama protest...

It's just moved venues.

It also stopped being racist — as I keep pointing out — without becoming sexist instead...

don't imagine that the Obama administration was free of public outrage.

It having existed does not mean, there was just as much of it.

intolerant? You mean intolerant like the recent riot and arson by students at UC Berkeley because someone with a different opinion was threatening to use WORDS at a public speech?

Or do you mean intolerant like when a trump supporter was knocked unconscious and beaten at an airport in Portland?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...

Or do you mean intolerant like when a gay guy in texas was minding his own business and beaten unconscious? his only crime, having a lighter with donald trumps picture on it
http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

Or do you mean intolerant when a hispanic trump supporter was beaten on inaugration day?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

Or do you mean intolerant like during the campaign thousands of Hillary supporters violently attacked and destroyed property belonging to trump supporters?
http://cbs12.com/news/local/wo...
http://www.nydailynews.com/new...
http://wtnh.com/2016/11/12/pd-...
http://www.dailywire.com/news/...

Do yourself a favor and read up on the history of the rise of the S.S. you seem to like to throw the word Nazi and fascist around. The SS or SchutzStaffel were 'bodyguards' who went around attacking other candidates and their supporters of opposing political parties. I only see violent protests showing up repeatedly in the news coming from the Hillary group, and this predated even the run-up to the election. To violently attack, condone violent attacks, or looking the other was of said violent attacks, merely because you disagree with the opinions or WORDS that another person says is the same thing the SS did. Perhaps you are calling people Nazis and Intolerant because you suffer the psychological condition called PROJECTION.

I read about things.

You READ about things? Well, stop the presses then! With literally millions of news sources, could you cite something at least a bit specific?

Voting machines being few and defective in Democratic areas.

States run the elections and voting places, so why would Democrats tamper with voting machines in their own areas?

Voter ID laws combined with closing offices that issue licenses in heavily Democratic areas.

Voter ID laws prevent illegals and dead people from voting, not to mention preventing people from voting multiple times. Again, why would Democratic states close offices earlier if it impacts Democrats from voting?

Illegals and dead people do not vote in significant amounts. This is the sort of fraud that would be easy to find lots of examples of it it were going on, and we haven't seen them.

Funny, but Google pulls up enough examples of voter fraud:

• Hidden Camera: NYC Democratic Election Commissioner: They Bus People Around to Vote
• North Carolina Hillary Supporter Brags on Facebook about Voting Multiple Times
• Double Voting - Even Triple Voting - Found in US Elections
• Democrat Confirms Rampant Voter Fraud
• CBS4 Investigation Finds People Voting Twice
• Detroit Recount Reveals Major Vot Fraud by Dems
• A JMU Student has allegedly registered 19 dead people to vote

Read some real news sometime.

May I suggest the same to you?

Cynic in me says they are looking for someone who can be implicated as a terrorist supporter to be used to justify the ban.

Funny thing about that...

Trumps actual order has an exception for immigrants who are already in transit, viz section (e): "[...] when the person is already in transit and denying admission would cause undue hardship -- and it would not pose a risk to the security or welfare of the United States."

So holding people up at US airports just some ICE pricks trying to make a false narrative to paint Trump in a bad light.

And other than Syria, which was specifically referenced in the order, Trump is using Obama's list of Muslim countries, viz: "Obama restricted visa waivers for those seven Muslim-majority countries — Iran, Iraq, Syria, Sudan, Somalia, Libya and Yemen — and now, Trump is looking to bar immigration and visitors from the same list of countries."

So this is just lefties not caring about the actual issue. When they do it it's OK, but thay have to paint Trump in a bad light when he does it.

(Speaking of which, has Hillary been seen in a black church or black community since November? Or was that just an election thing?)

Also, Obama banned Iraq refugees for 6 months and we didn't hear a peep out of the lefties. Once again, they don't care about the issue, only which side does it.

And no, he didn't ban Muslim immigration. Muslims from Turkey and Saudi Arabia (for example) are not affected by this.

There's a fuckton of people on social media who are actually in favor of this, and who see this as a temporary measure intended to create common-sense rules intended to keep us safe. People are also noting that this was one of his campaign promises, and it's both surprising and refreshing to see someone actually keeping those promises.

You guys have 6 1/2 years to groom a replacement, and you'd better get started real soon now. Your campaign strategy of being the "lesser of two evils" won't work the next time around.

If Jared Kushner or Donald Jr. decides to run for president, the current of actually kept promises will be almost impossible to swim against.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

There are links in there to the Buzzfeed and CNN articles about the "intel".

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

They have proven voter fraud in this last election. No, I am not talking about fictional "Russian" hacking, I am talking about complete and utter incompetence or malfeasance in several areas, exposed by the bullshit Recall orchestrated on behalf of the DNC and Clinton campaign by Jill Stein. We're talking huge problems in largely democrat voting precincts. Can't really blame any of that on Republicans or Russians, and the MSM didn't see it fit to report.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

While I don't know if your point was sarcasm or not, the fact is, election fraud does happen, does happen a lot, we just don't have enough checks in the system to catch it. Heaven forbid we actually do what Mexico does, or India and require people to show up at the polls, and have proper ID. That is way to inconvenient for our nonchalance.

It's a public statement by the guy who got the emails. It's much more than CNN has to back the Obama admins story.

Obama's statements were public. CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, C-Span all covered it. You can question the lack of presented evidence if you want.

But Assange? It's exactly nothing but a statement by a guy who could and would lie for his own gain without batting an eye.

Zero more. Zero anything.

If Julian Assange wanted credibility, he'd have to put up some verifiable information.

As it is, he can't even manage to appear non-biased. That's his own fault. Seriously.

Also, about Hitler.

when is brittain planning to copy this one?

Well, Twitter is already doing it, in America too — an early bird, so to speak. But, hey, they are a private company, so we have no need to worry, right?

Well, the new generation of citizens is being accustomed to censoring selves and others in colleges — including professors — so, in 10-20 years, you'll have it world-wide, US and other elements of the British empire included.

First point: In my original post above, I did not specify who the outsiders are. Unless the protests are being paid for by the actual protesters, then there must be an outside source of funds. That isn't conspiracy theory, that's economics 101, someone has to pay the bills. Whether is is George Soros or someone else, and whether the outsiders funded thousands of dollars or millions, the point stands that someone with money is funding the protests.

Second point: A Google search for "funding of black lives matter" shows numerous links to articles debating the truth and falsehood of particular persons and groups funding Black Lives Matter in particular, and other similar/related groups in general. Go read a few, and you'll find more than white supremacy to keep you occupied.

Here are a few interesting ones.
http://www.washingtontimes.com...
http://www.thenewamerican.com/...
http://www.snopes.com/ford-mot...
http://www.politico.com/story/...

Third point: I also did not limit my statement to any specific protest group that has happened lately. So how about a Google search for "funding of protests"?

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...
https://www.lewrockwell.com/20...

I'm sure you will use your cop-out line of "white supremacists" and "alt-right", and whatever hand-waving you have to do, to ignore reports that you don't like. There were certainly links to the sites you mentioned, and others you will also ignore. But it would take a strong will to ignore all of them.

Have a nice day.

First point: In my original post above, I did not specify who the outsiders are. Unless the protests are being paid for by the actual protesters, then there must be an outside source of funds. That isn't conspiracy theory, that's economics 101, someone has to pay the bills. Whether is is George Soros or someone else, and whether the outsiders funded thousands of dollars or millions, the point stands that someone with money is funding the protests.

Second point: A Google search for "funding of black lives matter" shows numerous links to articles debating the truth and falsehood of particular persons and groups funding Black Lives Matter in particular, and other similar/related groups in general. Go read a few, and you'll find more than white supremacy to keep you occupied.

Here are a few interesting ones.
http://www.washingtontimes.com...
http://www.thenewamerican.com/...
http://www.snopes.com/ford-mot...
http://www.politico.com/story/...

Third point: I also did not limit my statement to any specific protest group that has happened lately. So how about a Google search for "funding of protests"?

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...
http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...
https://www.lewrockwell.com/20...

I'm sure you will use your cop-out line of "white supremacists" and "alt-right", and whatever hand-waving you have to do, to ignore reports that you don't like. There were certainly links to the sites you mentioned, and others you will also ignore. But it would take a strong will to ignore all of them.

Have a nice day.

Are you actually saying that violent people on the right are smarter than those on the left because they seem to be able to commit violent acts and not get caught?

Because fake hate crimes are totally never a thing: http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

Bleh, if it's something that boring, we've got a dozen examples of using the Clinton Global Initiative / Clinton Foundation money in bogus ways. Here you go. That's only equivalent. Go to /r/wikileaks and start reading the real bad stuff for yourself, don't let CNN think for you (they're lying). Don't get me wrong, though, I don't support anyone doing that. But that's like the least bad stuff we've found in the Podesta & FBI dumps. I hope those deals all get stopped and the lawsuits are won. Oh, and you remember how Colin Powell supported Clinton? Turns out there's a document between him & her describing how to break the email rules. For anyone asking: feel free to throw the book at him for anything you can prove in a court of law. I'd happily rule against any of the shady business deals against any of them were I a juror.

But there's just so much even worse stuff going on. Remember that gunless "assassin"? It was a bird dogging attempt (agian). And an old lady who lives with him died back in 2002, but she's still voting.

Make sure you look into the sources on that. See, we have her address (same as his). We know when she died. We have voting records showing that she's been voting all this time. And we have him mentioned in the Stratfor dumps. Yet another bird dogging attempt and all the links are out there for anyone who wants to look them up. It's easy to see one news item you don't agree with and dump it, but be sure you look at the election records, look up the address, look up the death records.

As for the rate of going through these, we've found that they love to use irrelevant subjects like "congratulations" to send some of the crazy attachments. So while I can totally believe they'd filter out "irrelevant" emails, they'd be led around by the nose if they did so.

Or how about the literal assassination attempts on Trump?

Specifically, the one in Las Vegas where the guy tried to steal a gun from a guard.

Not to be confused with the more recent one that was just another attempt at bird dogging, wherein we've found the person behind it. Bonus points? He was in the Stratfor dumps too.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...

Yeah, they almost got away with another bird dogging attempt.

No wonder they were so quick to interview him on the media and get this story out, whereas you see little mention of that guy in Nevada who tried to steal guard's gun at a rally to shoot Trump.

This is just a blatant Hatch Act violation.

Senator Reid — a Slashdot veteran? Why are you calling yourself "sh00z"?

While on the subject of Hatch Act, perhaps, you should look into John Podesta's BFF — who tipped her campaign before, and whose son joined the campaign openly — "investigating" Hillary Clinton?

What? That Trump is a Russian operative?

Absolutely! The Russians also infiltrated Hillarys brain and convinced her to set up a private email server. Podesta's too - the Russians convinced him to set his password to 'p@ssw0rd'. Yep, it was the Russians and not the fact that Podesta is an @ssh0le and accessory to murder.

The Russians also duplicated state department emails from Huma Abedin onto Carlos Danger's laptop. Yep, the Russians...

There is no precedent for a guy that makes weird sounds and posts provocative tweets having a chance of becoming POTUS. The other side has to be so completely unelectable as to win it for them. With the help of the Russians no doubt?

Huma, stop posting as an AC.
1. Bill's history of abusing his position of power in order to exploit women is very well known and documented. There are plenty of interviews and books written about it by many of the women he's used and abused. And Hillary has a documented history of attacking these same women, in order to silence them or destroy their credibility. Finally, we have actual rape accusations against Bill that have been swept under the rug by a Democrat loving media. Why didn't NBC ever release the full interview they did of Juanita Broaddrick?
2. Did he say he was not going to accept the results at all? Or did he say he'll keep you in suspense?
3. The only people claiming O'Keefe is a liar and that he's engaging in misleading filming and editing are those that have been made to look bad by his revelations. The fact that the people in his videos "he put out weeks before the election" have RESIGNED tells you there doesn't need to be any vetting, they know they've been caught. And the fact that YOU don't want to believe any of it, and want to dismiss all of his revelations as fraudulent tells me you're a huge partisan Democrat hack.
4. http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...
5. http://downtrend.com/71superb/...

Meanwhile
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/ar...

11 years without a major hurricane strike. I was pretty sure the east coast and at least NYC were supposed to be under water by now

http://www.salon.com/2001/10/2...

Oops

Under the right conditions, a "major hurricane" isn't required. Have we already forgotten Hurricane Sandy, the disaster which led a respected Republican to embrace a Kenyan?
http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...
Hurricane strikes are largely luck or the lack of it.

Also, try not to be US-centric - it's called GLOBAL warming; there has been some impressive typhoons in the past few years, including one that was 1/2 the size of India - or 2.5 times the size of Texas. That was Haiyan aka Super Typhoon Yolanda which killed 10,000 Filipinos.

There's also some dispute as to whether or not we'll see more superstorms as wind shear may be exacerbated by a warming world and that should reduce the number of hurricanes.

"It's not slavery if the man allows the whipping to take place".

It is slavery, if the man can be punished (up to and including by death) for refusing to work for free.

Trump held no power over the women involved. He may have flaunted his wealth, but, unlike Clinton, he never used armed men under his command to compel his victims into sex acts. And yet, you consider Bill Clinton the best President ever (or second only to Obama), while Trump's "assaults" make him an abomination.

Your hypocrisy is not even thick — it is rock solid already...

"Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything." - Abraham Lincoln

No, what Lincoln actually said was “Bitch nigga buy your own damn fries.”

Clinton won the vote without the superdelegate vote so in fact we do know that Sanders would not have won. There was no rigging of the election.

I personally know of two Bernie suppporters who didn't vote because the press claimed from the beginning that the results were a foregone conclusion due to the superdelegate vote. The news from April and May were rife with interviews from people who were voting for Clinton simply because they felt that, although Bernie was the better candidate, they had been told repeatedly in DNC sponsored ads that Bernie couldn't win a general election (We heard that same crap about Trump from the other side, and he still might win in spite of himself). In short, It is my considered opinion that Sander would have won had the superdelegates withheld their votes until after the general election. This is Not just My opinion

Granted, no one can know what would have been, but when voters are staying home, or otherwise voting for a different candidate because the establishment has told them their pick cant win anyways; when voters are not even being given the chance to hear about a candidate because the DNC has picked their winner and wont even release the party roles so that the candidate can reach primary voters and likely donors; When DNC executives are actively contacting large party donors and telling them not to give money to a candidate: Its hard not to think about how much that candidate has been screwed. This is the real reason people hate Hilary. Not because she is a bad person, but because bad people and corrupt people made sure she would get the nomination. It was handed to her as though it were somehow her due.

The most telling aspect of this election: Nearly every single person Sanders spoke to in person voted for him. The same cannot be said of any other candidate.